U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

Mark One

X . QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2012

. TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _______

Commission File No.: 333- 176752

ONLINE-REDEFINED, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

8471

26-3897720

(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number

IRS Employer

Identification Number

1347 North .Stanley Avenue - #4

Los Angeles, CA 90046

(Address of principal executive offices)

(203) 668-5029

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Indicate by checkmark whether the issuer: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filed, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer . Accelerated filer .

Non-accelerated filer . Smaller reporting company X .

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes . No X .

Applicable Only to Issuer Involved in Bankruptcy Proceedings During the Preceding Five Years.

N/A

Indicate by checkmark whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes X . No .

Applicable Only to Corporate Registrants

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the most practicable date:


Class	Outstanding as of August 17, 2012
Common Stock, $0.0001	4,204,000

Online - Redefined, Inc.

June 30, 2012 and 2011

Index to the Financial Statements

Contents

Page(s)

Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011

Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Interim Period Ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)

Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)

Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)


Online Redefined Inc.
Balance Sheets

					June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
					(Unaudited)

Assets
Current Assets
	Cash			$	90,867	$	72,802
	Accounts receivable				1,030		-
	Prepaid expenses				5,050		-

		Total Current Assets			96,947		72,802

			Total Assets	$	96,947	$	72,802


Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
	Accounts Payable			$	16,400	$	-
	Accrued expenses				3,710		1,760
	Advances from stockholder				47,300		58,179

		Total Current Liabilities			67,410		59,939

Stockholders' Equity

	Preferred stock: $0.0001 par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding				-		-
	Common stock: $0.0001 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized; 4,204,000 shares issued and outstanding				420		420
	Additional paid-in capital				60,980		56,980
	Accumulated deficit				(31,863)		(44,537)

		Total Stockholders' Equity			29,537		12,863

			Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	96,947	$	72,802

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

Online Redefined Inc.

Statements of Operations


				For the Three Months				For the Six Months
				Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
				2012		2011		2012		2011
				(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

REVENUES			$	46,330	$	7,494	$	55,350	$	8,327

COST OF REVENUES				7,264		2,940		14,998		5,354

GROSS MARGIN				39,066		4,554		40,352		2,973

OPERATING EXPENSES
	Professional fees			17,300		-		17,300		-
	General and administrative expenses			5,042		9,461		10,405		10,259

		Total Operating Expenses		22,342		9,461		27,705		10,259

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS				16,724		(4,907)		12,647		(7,286)

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES
	Interest income			(14)		(9)		(27)		(13)

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES				16,738		(4,898)		12,674		(7,273)

INCOME TAX PROVISION				-		-		-		-

NET INCOME (LOSS)			$	16,738	$	(4,898)	$	12,674	$	(7,273)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:			$	0.00	$	(0.00)	$	0.00	$	(0.00)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - basic and diluted				4,204,000		4,204,000		4,204,000		4,204,000

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.


Online Redefined Inc.
Statement of Stockholders' Equity
For the Interim Period Ended June 30, 2012
(Unaudited)

	Common Stock,
	$0.0001 Par Value			Additional				Total
	Number of			Paid-in		Accumulated		Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Equity

Balance, December 31, 2010	4,204,000	$	420	$	50,980	$	(44,310)	$	7,090

Capital Contributions	-		-		6,000		-		6,000

Net loss	-		-		-		(227)		(227)

Balance, December 31, 2011	4,204,000		420		56,980		(44,537)		12,863

Capital Contributions	-		-		4,000		-		4,000

Net income	-		-		-		12,674		12,674

Balance, June 30, 2012	4,204,000	$	420	$	60,980	$	(31,863)	$	29,537

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.


Online - Redefined, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows



				For the Six Months
				Ended June 30,
				2012		2011
				(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)			$	12,674	$	(7,273)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Accounts receivable		(1,030)
		Prepaid expenses		(5,050)		-
		Accounts payable		16,400		-
		Accrued expenses		1,950		-

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES				24,944		(7,273)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Amount received (paid to) from stockholder			(10,879)		39,953
	Capital contributions			4,000		-

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES				(6,879)		39,953

NET CHANGE IN CASH				18,065		32,680

Cash, Beginning of Period				72,802		19,392

Cash, End of Period			$	90,867	$	52,072

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
	Cash paid for interest		$	-	$	-
	Cash paid for income taxes		$	-	$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

Online - Redefined, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

June 30, 2012 and 2011

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 -Organization and Operations

Online - Redefined, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 17, 2008. The Company engages in website design and implementation.

Note 2 -Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 3, 2012.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments, allowance for doubtful accounts, income tax rate, income tax provision, deferred tax assets and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:


Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of the instrument.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

It is not however, practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders, if any, due to their related party nature.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. mounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Income Tax Provision

The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes. Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in years and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially outstanding common shares assumes that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented.

There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the interim period ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05

In June 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which was the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now gives entities the option to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.

The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively and are effective for public entity for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08

In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.

The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10 “Property, Plant and Equipment: Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification” (“ASU 2011-09”). This Update is to resolve the diversity in practice as to how financial statements have been reflecting circumstances when parent company reporting entities cease to have controlling financial interests in subsidiaries that are in substance real estate, where the situation arises as a result of default on nonrecourse debt of the subsidiaries.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2012 for public entities. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”). This Update is a deferral of the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05. FASB is to going to reassess the costs and benefits of those provisions in ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Due to the time required to properly make such a reassessment and to evaluate alternative presentation formats, the FASB decided that it is necessary to reinstate the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02

In July 2012, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” (“ASU 2012-02”).

This Update is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of testing indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill for impairment. This guidance builds upon the guidance in ASU 2011-08, entitled Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 was issued on September 15, 2011, and feedback from stakeholders during the exposure period related to the goodwill impairment testing guidance was that the guidance also would be helpful in impairment testing for intangible assets other than goodwill.

The revised standard allows an entity the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, thus necessitating that it perform the quantitative impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired.

This Update is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Earlier implementation is permitted.

All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

Other Recently Issued, but not yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3 –Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at June 30, 2012. This factor raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

While the Company is attempting to commence full operations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management may raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Related Party Transactions

Advances from Stockholder

From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Advances from majority stockholder and Chief Executive Officer at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, consisted of the following:



	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011

Advances from major stockholder and Chief Executive Officer	$	47,300	$	58,179

	$	47,300	$	58,179

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the majority stockholder and chief executive officer advanced $45,877 to the Company for working capital purposes.

For the interim period ended June 30, 2012, the majority stockholder and chief executive officer was repaid $10,879.

Free Office Space

The Company has been provided office space by its majority stockholder and Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.

Note 5 – Stockholders’ Equity

Shares Authorized

The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Twenty One Million (21,000,000) shares of which One Million (1,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and Twenty Million (20,000,000) shall be Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share.

Common Stock

The Company was incorporated on December 17, 2008 at which time 3,920,000 shares of common stock were issued to the Company’s founder or $392 for repayment of expenses associated with the incorporation of the Company.

On December 17, 2008, the Company sold 80,000 shares of common stock at par value $0.0001 per share to an individual for $8.

For the Period from September 30, 2009 through October 19, 2009, the Company sold 124,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to sixteen (16) individuals, or $31,000 in aggregate for cash.

For the period from February 22, 2010 through March 22, 2010, the Company sold 80,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to thirteen (13) individuals, or $20,000 in aggregate for cash.

Additional Paid-in Capital

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the majority stockholder of the Company contributed $6,000 as capital.

For the interim period ended June 30, 2012, the majority stockholder of the Company contributed $4,000 as capital.

Note 6 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

We caution you that reliance on any forward-looking statement involves risks and uncertainties, and that although we believe the assumptions on which our forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions could be incorrect. In light of these and other uncertainties, you should not conclude that we will necessarily achieve any plans and objectives or projected financial results referred to in any of the forward-looking statements. We do not undertake to release the results of any revisions of these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances. Some of the factors that may cause actual results, developments and business decisions to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include the following:

our ability to raise additional capital and secure additional financing;

anticipated trends in our financial condition and results of operations;

our ability to hire and retain key employees;

Risks related to diverting management’s attention from ongoing business operations.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in the “Risk Factor” section.

OVERVIEW

We are a computer consulting company that presently specializes in programming, networking, and customization of hardware for small to mid size businesses. Clients are provided with creative website design, search engine optimization, graphics, and retail applications for their online catalogs. The Company intends to expand its current operations by offering broader and more advanced applications and services aimed at the rapidly evolving mobile technology market. We believe that with enhancements to our staff and product offering it will be able to compete for projects for mid-large size companies. We are becoming a public company with a plan to raise funds to hire specialized in-house programming staff, graphic designers, and developers with expertise in languages such as Java, Perl, PHP, Grails and Ruby on Rails. Online-Redefined also intends to move clients to downloadable applications or widgets for access to information on servers through smart phones and tablets without requiring an internet browser. There is no assurance that we will be successful in these endeavors or that if accomplishes all of these steps it will be able to operate profitably. Based on informal preliminary studies and experience in the industry, the Company believes that its plans represent a legitimate growth opportunity for the Company and its shareholders.

DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Implementing our planned business operation is dependent on our ability to raise between $500,000 and $2,500,000 of additional capital after all offering expenses paid to a placement agent, attorneys, accountants and the like.

Our plan is to utilize such capital we raise as follows:


		If a Net of $500,000 is Raised		If a Net of $2,500,000 is Raised

Renting and Furnishing Offices	$	25,000	$	100,000

Equipment	$	50,000	$	125,000

Officer Salaries	$	260,000	$	900,000

Marketing Expense	$	100,000	$	500,000

Working Capital	$	65,000	$	875,000

The foregoing are estimates only and any funds may be reallocated based upon management’s evaluation of then existing conditions. Until we raise additional funds we will continue operations at approximately our current levels. In addition, being a public company will cost us approximately $20,000 a year in professional and other fees. We will continue to rely on advances from Mr. Faiman, as required, to meet these obligations. However, Mr. Faiman has not entered into a written agreement with us to provide any financial support. Our plan is to complete a private capital raise in the next 12 months, but we do not have any present commitments for raising any capital.

Results of Operations

Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

Our revenue increased to $55,350 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared with $8,327 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. We attribute changes in our revenue to normal variations and gradual growth as we move forward in our current model. We anticipate that our revenues will steadily grow from their 2012 base.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

Cost of Revenues increased to $14,998 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $5,354 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increased costs of revenues reflects increases associated with increased business activity. Since our Cost of Revenues grew faster than our Revenues, we realized a gross margin of $40,352 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to a gross margin of $2,973 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our gross margin was significantly increased because of certain projects were mainly done by the our Chief Executive Officer and there were no programming cost incurred.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses, consisting of General and administrative expense and professional fees, increased to $27,705 for the six months ended 2012 compared to $10,259 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in operating expenses reflects increased professional fees associated with our becoming a public company..

Net Income (Loss)

Our net income increased to $12,674 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $(7,273) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 reflecting increased activities in connection with the restart of our business in 2011.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

Our revenue increased to $46,330 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $7,494 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. We attribute changes in our revenue to normal variations and gradual growth as we move forward in our current model. We anticipate that our revenues will steadily grow from their 2012 base.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

Cost of Revenues increased to $7,264 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $2,940 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increased costs of revenues reflects increases associated with increased business activity. Since our Cost of Revenues grew faster than our revenues, we realized a gross margin of $39,066 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a gross margin of $4,554 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our gross margin was significantly increased because of certain projects were mainly done by the our Chief Executive Officer and there were no programming cost incurred.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses, consisting of General and administrative expense and professional fees, increased to $22,342 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $9,461 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in operating expenses reflects increased professional fees associated with our becoming a public company.

Net (Loss)

Our net income increased for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $16,738 from $(4,898) for the three months ended June 30, 2011, reflecting increased activities in connection with the restart of our business in 2012.

Seasonality and Inflation

We do not believe that our business will be seasonal to any material extent. We do not believe that our results will be materially impacted by inflation in the current fiscal year.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Since our inception, we have financed our operations through sale of our common stock and fees generated by operations. There are no cash flows generated from our businesses as we are still a development stage company and has not yet commenced the operations. However, no assurance can be given that the future funding to be available through the sale of equity. As of June 30, 2012 we had $90,867 in cash. We believe that cash on hand may not be adequate to satisfy our ongoing working capital needs. During Fiscal Year 2012, our primary objectives in managing liquidity and cash flows will be to keep expand our business. Our cash on hand results from advances from our principal shareholder who is under no legal obligation to continue to make such advances. Even if Mr. Faiman were to fail to make any further advances and we were to fail to raise any additional funds, we believe we could continue operations for at least the 2012 calendar year

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

GOING CONCERN

The independent auditors' report accompanying our December 31, 2011 financial statements contained an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that we will continue as a going concern," which contemplates that we will realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

No report required.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 4T. - Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of June 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management has identified the following two material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that, as of June 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the quarter ending June 30, 2010. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on

our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:


	1.	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

	2.	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

	3.	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of the end of our most recent quarter, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, as of June 30, 2012, such internal control over financial reporting was not effective. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal control over financial reporting that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives of having segregation of the initiation of transactions, the recording of transactions and the custody of assets. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of June 30, 2012.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (1) and (2) above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only the management's report in this report.

Management's Remediation Initiatives

In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:

We will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us. First, we will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives of having separate individuals perform (i) the initiation of transactions, (ii) the recording of transactions and (iii) the custody of assets. Second, we will create a senior position to focus on financial reporting and standardizing and documenting our accounting procedures with the goal of increasing the effectiveness of the internal controls in preventing and detecting misstatements of accounting information. Third, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds are available to us. We anticipate the costs of implementing these remediation initiatives will be approximately $50,000 to $100,000 a year in increased salaries, legal and accounting expenses.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.

We anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not fully, implemented by December 31, 2012. However, due to our small size and limited resources we could experience additional delays in implementation.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Management is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by any governmental authority or any other party involving us or our properties. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, no director, officer or affiliate is (i) a party adverse to us in any legal proceeding, or (ii) has an adverse interest to us in any legal proceedings. Management is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against us or our properties.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

No report required.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

No report required.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits:

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a).

32.1 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	ONLINE – REDEFINED, INC.
Dated: August 20, 2012	By: /s/ Dan Faiman
	Dan Faiman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Online-Redefined, Inc. 10-Q