UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number 0-18113

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer in its charter)

Utah		87-0405405
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)


3380 North El Paso Street, Suite G, Colorado Springs, Colorado		80907
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number (719) 630-3800

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock

(Title of class)

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No []

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [] No [X]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $660,151

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. September 10, 2008: $1,144,817

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date. September 10, 2008: 9,247,885

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

Certain statements made herein are forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They include statements based on management's current expectations and estimates; actual results may differ materially due to certain risks and uncertainties. For example, the ability of Let's Go Aero, Inc. to achieve expected results may be affected by external factors such as competitive price pressures, conditions in the economy and industry growth, and internal factors, such as future financing and the ability to control expenses.

- 2 -

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business.

LGA Holdings, Inc., ("LGA" or the "Company") is the sole owner of its operating subsidiary, Let's Go Aero, Inc. ("Aero"). LGA acquired Aero effective June 30, 2004 through a stock for stock exchange under which the former shareholders of Aero were issued new LGA shares of common stock in exchange for all of Aero's outstanding shares and $1,518,440 of debt. The former Aero shareholders and debt holders ended up with 85% of the outstanding common stock of LGA. Prior to the acquisition, LGA had no business or operations after having sold what business it did have October 22, 2003, several months before the acquisition of Aero. Therefore, at the time of the acquisition of Aero, LGA was what is known as a publicly held shell company. LGA changed its name to LGA, Inc. from Tenet Information Services, Inc. by a vote of shareholders on May 27, 2005, but the name was not available according to the Utah Secretary of State. By consent of shareholders owning in excess of a majority of shares, the name was changed to LGA Holdings, Inc. in October, 2005. LGA was formed on February 24, 1984.

Upon the acquisition of Aero, two of LGA's three Directors resigned and two Directors of Aero were appointed to fill those positions. The third LGA director was and is a director of both companies. In addition, all of the officers of LGA resigned and members of Aero's management team were appointed to those positions. See Item 9, below. For accounting purposes, however, the transaction was deemed to have been an acquisition of LGA by Aero. Further information on the details of the transaction can be had by reviewing LGA's Form 8-K filed July 21, 2004 and Form 8-K/A filed October 20, 2004 available at the EDGAR website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (www.sec.gov) or from LGA upon request. Copies may also be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room, Headquarters Office, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Call (800) SEC-0330 for further information.

Let's Go Aero, Inc.

Aero, LGA's wholly owned subsidiary, is LGA's only operating business. Aero is in the business of designing and selling gear management solutions for automotive, recreation and commercial uses. Aero's family of products uses patented designs, and includes the GearWagon(R) line of Sport Performance Trailers(R), the GearSpace(TM) line of hitch-mount cargo carriers, the Silent Hitch Pin line, the LittleGiant Trailer line and the GullWing line of RV technology. Aero was formed in 1998.

Aero was founded as a product design, development and engineering company. It specializes in providing novel solutions for vehicular cargo carrying enhancements. Aero has patents issued and pending that protect its intellectual property. These patents and claims relate to how cargo can be attached and carried on a vehicle's hitch receiver, frame, or body surface. Some examples are:

o	Silent Hitch Pin(TM) rigidly couples the connection between the trailer hitch receiver and any inserted ball mount or accessory;

o	TwinTube(TM) provides a universal mounting structure for carrying gear and equipment with a receiver style hitch;

o	The fully-enclosed, encapsulated, and easy-opening designs of Aero's product enclosures for cargo safety, security, and accessibility; and

Aero also has numerous product extensions and accessories that complement and expand these core technologies.

- 3 -

Aero's intellectual property has broad application in the automotive industry, and several automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers are in various stages of integrating aspects of Aero's technology into their product lines. Aero has developed and will continue to develop intellectual property for the Automotive, RV and commercial industries. It is Aero's intent to license its technology to the industry leaders that can most effectively bring the licensed technology to market. Aero plans to license the production and sales of its products for up-front fees and ongoing royalties based on unit sales.

Products

Aero currently has several product lines that it has been selling for several years and other product lines that are emergent. These product lines are described as follows:

o	GearWagon 125 Sport Performance Trailers(R). Aero's GearWagon(R) line of Sport Performance Trailers(R) are designed for carrying all types of personal, recreational, and commercial gear in an aerodynamic, weather-resistant, secure and attractive transport.

o	GearSpace(TM) Carriers. The GearSpace(TM) hitch based carrier line consists of two fully enclosed cargo carrier models, GearSpace 34(TM) and GearSpace 20(TM), with three structural options to choose from for varying function while on the vehicle's hitch receiver. These designs offer versatility, security and safety.

o	SILENT HITCH PIN(TM). This anti-vibration device takes all movement out of the connection between the vehicle towing system and what's being towed or carried. In short, it freezes the attachment securely in place. It works with most consumer vehicle towing systems.

o	TwinTube(TM) System. The TwinTube(TM) ("TT(TM)") System is a patented design that was included in the technology licensed to Sport Rack International/Valley Industries, Inc. as discussed above. TwinTube(TM) is a universal mounting structure for carrying gear and equipment with a hitch receiver. TwinTube(TM) is also available as a UBI(TM) system (U-Build-It).

o	GearDeck(TM) System. Incorporating Aero's novel TwinTube(TM) technology, GearDeck(TM) is a modular carrier that functions as an open platform carrier or a fully-enclosed carrier through the use of a modular hardtop lid enclosure that is easily attached and removed. The open platform can carry bicycles, among many other large items; the full enclosure system carries all kinds of general cargo as well as items such as power generators.

o	GearCrate(TM)/LittleGiant Trailer System(TM). New design for both a stand alone recyclable shipping crate, a stand alone utility trailer and the novel function of a shipping crate that can be easily converted into a trailer at destination for the device being shipped; for example, ATV's, motorcycles, generators, welders, etc. The design debuted at the April, 2005, Canton Fair in Guangzhou, China.

o	GullWing(TM) camper. Derivative of Little Giant Trailer(TM). New design for personal motor sport and RV applications. The GullWing(TM) design allows a cargo trailer to convert into a new category of camping trailer. GullWing(TM) intellectual property also has application for pickup toppers and pickup campers. On October 7, 2006 the U.S. Patent and Trade Office notified LGA of its acceptance of LGA's GullWing claims, and the patent was issued on February 20, 2007. LGA is in discussions with several RV Original Equipment Manufacturers regarding the GullWing/Foldout intellectual property.

o	TENTRIS(TM) tent and portable structure. New design for tent and portable enclosure applications.

o	GearDeck APU(TM). New derivative of Aero's GearDeck 17 system. APU is an all-in-one electrical generator storage, transportation and organization solution designed initially for recreational vehicles. The APU system may also have application with the broader portable generator market.

o	ONAN JUICEBOX. During 2006, Aero completed a product development effort with the Onan division of Cummins, Inc. resulting in Onan's JuiceBox product. The licensed design is based on LGA's Silent Hitch Pin, TwinTube, GearDeck and LandingGear Intellectual Property. LGA began receiving product royalties in July, 2006. During fiscal 2007, a formal licensing agreement with Onan was signed that specifies per-unit royalty payments and the precise extent of licensing rights for Onan for the life of LGA’s patents. Since the signing of this agreement, revenues resulting from it have been immaterial.

PIXIE ™ BICYCLE CARRIER. During 2007, Aero developed and patented a new technology for bicycle carriers. Aero licensed this technology to Cequent Towing Products, a division of Trimas Corp., at the prototype stage of development, in January 2008. Aero expects to receive royalties from this license as Cequent brings products based upon this technology to market.

- 4 -

Business History

The impetus for Aero was a 1990 concept by its principal founder for a lightweight aerodynamic trailer to carry recreational gear. This concept led to the creation of a prototype product that was tested in 1997. In the fall of 1997, work began on what came to be the GearWagon(R) line of Sport Performance Trailers(R) (SPT). Aero was incorporated in April 1998, the first GearWagon(R) SPT hit the road in July, 1998, and Aero debuted two GearWagon(R) SPT's at the Interbike Trade Show in October, 1998.

After the Interbike Show in the Fall of 1998, Aero began receiving orders for GearWagon(R) trailers. Medallion Plastics in Elkhart, IN, became Aero's manufacturer of GearWagon(R) trailers in January, 1999.

In early 1999, Aero joined the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA). SEMA is the largest trade organization for the automotive after-market industry. Basically, SEMA is the entire automotive industry worldwide, less new vehicle sales. Aero displayed its products at SEMA's industry convention in November, 1999, as a debut to the automotive industry.

During the development of the GearWagon(R) line, the Company developed a concept for a hitch based cargo carrier line that resulted in Aero's GearSpace(TM) product line. The GearSpace(TM) 34 capsule also debuted at the 1999 SEMA convention.

Aero went on to design the Silent Hitch Pin(TM). Aero's patent application for the Silent Hitch Pin(TM), which was filed in mid-2000, was granted in May, 2003.

After the SEMA 2001 convention, Aero entered into a relationship with J.S. Chamberlain and Associates. Chamberlain and Associates has been an automotive supplier developer since the early 1960's. Through a series of meetings arranged by Chamberlain, Aero and Sport Rack International/Valley Industries, Inc. agreed to a product license for Aero's Silent Hitch Pin(TM) and Twin-Tube(TM) Technology in May, 2002.

At the SEMA 2002 convention Aero won the Best New SUV Accessory Idea from General Motors Corporation for its TwinTube(TM) carrier system. At the SEMA 2003 convention Aero won the Best New Idea award from General Motors Corporation for its GearBed surface attachment system. See “Patent Protection,” below.

With the Tenet combination, Aero began redesigning and retooling its GearDeck, TwinTube, GearSpace and GearWagon products in order to meet market pricing, durability, assembly and shipping expectations. Retooled GearDeck production began in early 2005, TwinTube production began in May, 2006, GearSpace production began in June, 2006, and the company began production and shipping of the retooled GearWagon 125 product in May, 2007. Also in May, 2007, LGA began shipping its new GearCage™ hitch mounted cargo carrier. In July, 2007, LGA began shipments of its new LGT-7 utility trailer. Also during 2007, LGA developed and patented the Pixie™ hitch-mounted bicycle carrier.

In January 2008, the Company signed a license agreement with Cequent Towing Products, a division of Trimas Corporation (Cequent). This license gives Cequent exclusive manufacturing and sales rights to the Company’s entire line of hitch-mounted cargo carriers, Silent Hitch Pin, and “Pixie” bicycle carrier, for a two-year period. Following the two-year exclusive period, Cequent retains non-exclusive rights for the life of the patents contained in these products. The agreement also contains a right of first refusal for Cequent on any license agreement that the Company may consider with other parties for the Company’s GearWagon 125 and Little Giant trailer products. The agreement provides for a $400,000 upfront fee and continuing royalties paid by Cequent to the Company for the life of the patents. Royalties are to be paid at the rate of 7% on Cequent’s net revenues from sales of products containing the licensed technology. The Company anticipates that these payments will substantially alter the Company’s business model going forward throughout Fiscal 2009 and beyond. The Company’s revenue mix will shift proportionally away from direct sales to distributors, dealers, and end users, toward proportionally increasing royalty and fee income into the foreseeable future. The Company plans to recognize revenue from the upfront fee on a straight-line basis

- 5 -

over the two year exclusive license period. At June 30, 2008, $100,000 of the up-front fee has been recognized, leaving $300,000 (carried on the Balance Sheet as “Unearned Revenue”) to be recognized over the next eighteen months. Royalties generated under this agreement have reached material rates of accrual as of June 30, 2008. The company anticipates that royalties from this agreement will continue to expand for the foreseeable future.

The Future

Aero's future focus is on market, partner and product development. There is a large consumer market for Aero's products, and Aero’s approach to this market is to enter it through partnership arrangements with large existing participants. The license with Cequent discussed above typifies that approach. We are offering licenses to all of our existing products under terms similar to the Cequent license. Royalties and other payments stemming from such licenses are currently allocated to fund continuing development of our newer ideas.

Objectives and Sales

Objectives

o	To establish manufacturing, sales and marketing for Aero's products domestically and internationally

o	To continue product development and invention work where a clear payoff is predictable

o	To establish positive operating cash flow and earnings

Customer Direct Sales

Historically, close to 80% of Aero's revenue has come from direct-to-end-user sales that resulted from the customer finding Aero's web site. This proportion has declined and is expected to continue declining as a result of the Cequent license and other similar licenses the company may issue in the future. We make our products available directly to consumers primarily to prove our products’ market viability to potential licensing partners, such as Cequent.

Aero has promoted its products primarily through a "Public Relations" approach. As a result of these efforts, Aero has spent little on direct advertising, yet has been featured in many national magazines, newspapers, and TV and radio shows. Because Aero's product designs are novel, publishers of magazines frequently feature them in the magazines’ "New Product Review" sections along with Aero's address and web site. This approach has been important to Aero's products getting discovered, while keeping its promotional expenses low.

Aero's customers also provide great leads for product sales. In addition to current owners giving Aero positive reviews to prospective new owners, Aero's products all feature its web site address on its product logo. Aero regularly gets inquiries from individuals who have seen Aero products in the field.

Market for Products

For many years, people have been increasing their recreation time and recreation interests. This trend has spurred a dramatic increase in the purchase of sport utility vehicles (SUV's), mini-vans, and pick-up trucks. The purchase of these style vehicles reflects, in part, the consumers' perceived need for increased cargo capacity.

The installed base of receiver style hitches presents a large latent market for Aero's products. Further, Aero believes that the automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers would like to migrate the accessories currently being carried on the roofs of SUVs to the receiver hitch in order to reduce the roll-over risk of SUVs and provide consumers with more convenient cargo carrying solutions.

Competition

The sport equipment carrier market is a competitive environment with more than ten participants that are larger than Aero and have the following advantages relative to Aero:

Name recognition

- 6 -

Several competitors, like Yakima Products and Thule have established names with the public. Aero is still relatively unknown. It can take years to establish a Brand name, and Aero is at the beginning of exposing its products and brand to the public. Aero’s success against these competitors can not be assured.

Product Lines

Several competitors have broad product lines compared to Aero. Aero participates in the roof top cargo carrier market in a limited way with a roof top version of its GearCage line and with GearBag, a full enclosure cargo bag that works well both on roof tops and as a full-enclosure accessory to GearCage.

In terms of product strength, Aero believes it has several distinct advantages over the competition:

o	Large cargo capacities and lightweight designs easily surpass the cargo transport capabilities of roof-top products and other receiver based products currently on the market.

o	The opening systems enable Aero products to enclose space more efficiently.

o	Aero enclosed carrier products offer increased security over open carriers.

o	Aero products are safer than rooftop carriers.

o	Patent filings protect Aero products' ergonomics and efficiencies.

o	Aero products' aerodynamic efficiencies reduce impact on fuel economy.

o	Multiple product offerings provide consumers with various options and price consideration.

Opening Systems

Aero's GearWagon(R) and GearSpace(TM) capsules represent a new category of container. These containers have shells that are concave so that the lids open by dropping and "nesting" under the base. This allows easy content access for customers. When closed, the shells are "self-reinforcing" and very tough.

Content Security

Aero's GearWagon® trailers, GearSpace™, and GearDeck™ carriers are lockable and fully enclosed so the owner's gear is in a water and dust free environment. When traveling, having gear out of sight is one of the best theft-prevention steps to take. This means high-value, lightweight objects like cameras and computers can be stowed out of sight in Aero's carriers.

Safety Factor

Safety comes in many forms for Aero customers. When compared to roof-based systems, Aero carriers do not raise a vehicle's center of gravity and therefore, when compared to a similar weight on the roof of a vehicle, make the vehicle less prone to rollover.

Aero's carriers are also loaded by standing on the ground. Roof carriers are commonly loaded by standing on a running board, a doorsill or a stepladder--all precarious positions from which to be lifting and moving gear. Most roof systems are limited to 100 pounds of gear weight. Most SUV hitch receivers are rated for 500 pounds of load carrying.

Patent Protection

Starting in 1998, Aero has been diligent at protecting its technology with "utility" patent protection, which is the highest form of invention protection. Utility patents are issued for truly novel technological achievements. The method by which Aero's product capsules open, the way Aero's GearSpace(TM) carrier platforms telescope and pivot, and the features of the Silent Hitch Pin(TM) are all patented aspects of Aero's products. All Aero's patents have at least 11 years remaining in their respective terms. Aero has eight issued patents and nine pending patents.

Aero has patents issued and patents pending protecting its GearBed intellectual property. Nissan Motor Company has challenged certain GearBed claims with the US Patent and Trademark Office. While Aero intends to pursue its claims vigorously, it cannot forecast the outcome of the GearBed patent review at this time.

- 7 -

Aerodynamic Efficiencies and Fuel Economy

It appears from informal evidence that Aero's GearWagon(R) line of Sport Performance Trailers(R) is fuel efficient. It also appears from informal evidence that Aero's GearSpace(TM) carriers have no noticeable effect on fuel economy. When used on an SUV, these carriers sit in the vehicle's draft.

Volume and Weight Advantages

Because of Aero's capsular designs, its products offer high "space-to-weight" ratios relative to other cargo carrying products currently on the market. The GearWagon(R) 125 weighs 480 pounds empty, encloses approximately 125 cubic feet and has a carrying capacity of 1,000 pounds. A standard "box" trailer with similar storage capability typically weighs close to 1,000 pounds empty, meaning that a fully loaded GearWagon(R) 125 weighs only 480 pounds more than a comparable empty box trailer. Aero's GearSpace(TM) line attaches to one of the strongest points on a vehicle, the hitch receiver. Aero rates its GearSpace(TM) carriers for 300 pounds of cargo carrying, which gives the owner of a standard SUV more than twice the weight carrying ability of a typical roof top box.

Manufacturing and Development

Manufacturing

Aero's focus is on product and technology development. As a result of the Cequent license, all significant product assembly operations formerly performed in-house have been taken over by Cequent. In the future, Aero may assemble new products, some trailer accessories, and possibly the GearWagon 125 trailer, in-house.

Aero purchased its initial inventory of LGT-7 trailers from AutoTek China, and anticipates a continuing and growing supplier relationship with Autotek China for the LGT-7 and other products utilizing that core technology.

Aero is actively engaged in specifying sources for all its assembly services, raw materials and parts in order to ensure that its products meet its quality and performance standards. All specified raw materials and parts or acceptable substitutions are available from many suppliers, and Aero does not rely on any one supplier the loss of which would cause any long term adverse consequences to Aero.

Shipping

The shipping cost of Aero's products is reasonable considering some of the products' sizes. Aero has shipped over 1,000 units from Elkhart, Indiana, to destinations throughout the United States. Aero has had few freight claims for damaged goods and believes it has the packaging adequate to properly protect the product.

Aero utilizes the shipping services of Yellow, DATS, FedEx, National, LTL, and Old Dominion among others.

Research and Development

Aero's expenditures for research and development have been $94,095 and $42,654. for the fiscal years ended June 30 2007 and 2008, respectively. See Management's Discussion and Analysis, below. Aero will continue product development and invention work where a clear payoff is anticipated. Aero is considering numerous ways to branch and grow its current products depending on market opportunity and demand. Aero continues to work on new product designs and improvements to protect and expand Aero's existing intellectual property.

Regulation

Aero has adopted all applicable standards from United States National Highway Transportation Safety Administration regulations and maintains adherence to Society of Automotive Engineers guidelines and specifications. In addition, both federal and state authorities regulate the manufacturers and sellers of recreational and family cargo transports. Aero is a licensed vehicle manufacturer in the State of Colorado and has obtained the state permits, licenses, and bonds required to operate.

- 8 -

Aero's products have been independently tested for impact and temperature extremes. Aero's Silent Hitch Pin(TM) and GearSpace(TM) Spine and Frame structural systems have been independently tested for load carrying strength.

Aero has had Corporate and Product Liability insurance for the last six years and has not had a product liability claim. Further, as Aero successfully licenses its designs, generally the licensee will be responsible for carrying manufacturer and product liability insurance.

Aero has registered with or obtained memberships, licenses, permits, or certificates from the following organizations and agencies:

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE); National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA); Dealer Section of the Department of Motor Vehicles, State of Colorado; and Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA).

Aero anticipates no material effects on its business from federal, state or local environmental regulation.

Employees

Aero currently has seven full-time employees including its officers, Marty Williams, Sara Williams, and Eric Nickerson. Aero's Vice President of Engineering and Board member, Matthew Drabczyk, who is also a major LGA shareholder, works on a project basis for Aero. Aero anticipates adding sales, administrative, and production employees as needed.

Reports Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

LGA is registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a registrant, LGA files annual (Form 10-KSB that contains audited financial information) and quarterly reports (Form 10-QSB that contain unaudited financial information). LGA also files proxy statements for its meetings of shareholders and reports of material current events (Form 8-K). This information may be requested or read through sources described above in this Item 1 or from the Company free of charge. The Company does not maintain copies of its Securities and Exchange Commission reports on its website, www.letsgoaero.com, because the reports are easily available at www.sec.gov. Although the Company is required to send annual reports to security holders that contain audited financial information when it solicits proxies for annual meetings of security holders, LGA has not held an annual meeting since 2004. LGA has no policy of voluntarily sending such reports to security holders.

Item 2. Description of Property.

Aero currently leases 7,500 square feet of combined office and warehouse space at its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, that it uses for storage of some inventory and light product assembly. Aero entered into this lease in June, 2008, and expects its facilities will be sufficient for the one-year term of the lease. We expect the lease to be renewable on nearly unchanged terms should we choose to do so upon its expiration. The lease rent is $6,100 per month. The space is currently fully built out in good condition and Aero has no plans to renovate it. Should Aero decide or be forced to move at expiration of the current lease, comparable properties both smaller and larger are available at competitive rates in the same general area as the current facilities. The current space is adequately covered by insurance.

Aero has a month-to-month lease on approximately 15,000 square feet of combined office and warehouse space, plus equipment and improvements, in Elkhart, Indiana. This facility houses the bulk of Aero’s trailer inventory, plus other raw material inventories. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, the lessor employs two people at the facility who perform sales fulfillment and inventory management functions for Aero.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

- 9 -

PART II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

LGA's common stock is currently thinly traded "over-the-counter" and is listed in the Pink Sheets(R) published by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. as well as on the OTC Bulletin Board operated by the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for LGA's common stock for each of the quarters ending on the indicated date.

	Quarter Ended	Low Price	High Price

2006	September 30	1.30	2.95
	December 31	.70	1.90
2007	March 31	1.01	1.65
	June 30	1.31	1.61
	September 30	1.45	1.65
	December 31	.51	1.50
2008	March 31	.51	.81
	June 30	.51	.51

The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without markup, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The sources of prices were Yahoo.com and BigCharts.com.

The number of shareholders of record for LGA's common stock as of June 30, 2008 was 351, which include depositories and broker/dealers who hold shares of common stock in "nominee" or "street" names.

The following table provides information as of the most recently completed fiscal year with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation agreements) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.

- 10 -

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	1,635,000	$1.01	189,635
Equity plans not approved by security holders *	1,870,308	$.93	0
Total	3,505,308	$..97	189,653

Sales of Unregistered Securities

The following table sets forth information regarding recent sales of unregistered securities.

	Shares of Common
Date	Stock Sold		Aggregate Price
August 2005		43,148	$	29,987.86
January 2006		215,738		149,937.91
June 2006		215,000		150,500.00
December 2006		215,000		150,500.00
January 2007		100,000		70,000.00
March 2007		25,000		31,250.00
April 2007		40,000		50,000.00
July 2007		40,000		50,000.00
July 2007		60,000		75,000.00
September 2007		35,350		25,100.00
January 2008		43,148		30,203.60
April 2008		30,204		21,142.80

All sales were either negotiated and approved by the Company's Board of Directors, or accomplished pursuant to an option exercise at the contracted exercise price. Each of the purchases, except those occurring in July, 2007, was made by an individual investor who was an existing shareholder. All purchasers represented that they were accredited investors as defined in the United States securities laws. The sales were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) and/or 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/or Rule 506 or Regulation D. The company is not aware of any open market purchases by affiliates.

- 11 -

Item 6 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Selected Operating Data	Fiscal Year Ended
	June 30,

	2008			2007

Revenue		660,151			408,707

Cost of revenue		417,597			261,996

S G & A (excluding Share-based compensation)		474,009			414,713

Share-based compensation		453,900			295,800

Research & Development		42,654			94,095

Embezzlement (expense), net of recoveries		(1,700	)		(44,764	)

Net (loss)		(741,686	)		(708,180	)

Year Ended June 30, 2008, compared to Year Ended June 30, 2007.

During Fiscal 2008, the Company’s revenue rose to $660,151 compared to $408,707 in revenue for Fiscal 2007. The increase stemmed primarily from increased inquiries generated by our website and customer referrals, from expanded royalty and fee income, and from sales of new products in 2008 that were not available in 2007. Due to the transition of our hitch-mounted product line to Cequent and to the newness of our trailer products, seasonality of our sales is difficult to detect and predict. At least through the period during which the Cequent upfront license fee will be amortized (through December 31, 2009), and perhaps beyond, we anticipate that royalty and fee income will increase as a proportion of our total revenues.

Cost of revenue for Fiscal 2008 was $417,597 compared to $261,996 for Fiscal 2007. Gross margin held steady at approximately 36% in both years primarily due to a slight narrowing of margins on product sales, offset by the rising proportion of royalty revenues, carrying 100% gross margins, to total revenue. The company anticipates continuing increases in the royalty proportion of total revenue for the foreseeable future.

Selling, General & Administrative expenses (excluding Share-based compensation) increased to $474,009 for Fiscal 2008, compared to $414,713 for Fiscal 2007. The increase is primarily attributable to increases in a broad range of overhead expenses associated with the increase in sales.

Share-based compensation (included as a component of S G & A in the accompanying Statement of Operations) is the cost to the Company of qualified and non-qualified stock options awarded during the Fiscal Year, valued in accordance with the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. The computed value of these awards totaled $453,900 in Fiscal 2008 versus $295,800 in Fiscal 2007. The options awarded during both years went to management personnel and non-management associates of the Company as incentive for services anticipated to be rendered beyond these periods indefinitely into the future. The value of the awards should not be considered indicative of future option award values.

- 12 -

Research and Development expense for Fiscal 2008 was $42,654 compared to $94,095 for the prior year. The decrease is attributable to reorientation of the Company’s product development efforts towards improvements and accessories to our primary products, given that the relatively costly development of our primary products was substantially completed in 2007.

The Company suffered substantial embezzlement losses due to activities of a former employee during fiscal 2006 and 2007. Embezzlement expenses, net of recoveries, declined to $1,700 during Fiscal 2008, from $44,764 in Fiscal 2007, and we anticipate no further losses or recoveries. We have implemented internal control procedures which we believe will prevent any future losses from embezzlement.

Net loss for Fiscal 2008 increased to ($741,686) or ($0.08) per share compared to ($708,180) or ($0.08) in the prior year primarily due to the reasons discussed above.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s cash position was $19,914 at June 30, 2008, versus $-0- at June 30, 2007. Occasional reductions of our cash balance to $-0-, called an “overdraft” condition, have all been for brief periods in immaterial amounts and have generated no interest expenses. The company has met all of its financial obligations in a timely manner. During Fiscal 2008, the Company used $143,937 to fund operating activities. This negative operating cash flow was substantially less than the $741,686 net loss in Fiscal 2008 primarily due to $453,900 of stock-based compensation (a non-cash expense), and classification as unearned revenue of $300,000 of the $400,000 upfront license fee paid by Cequent.

LGA Capital Requirements

During Fiscal 2007 and 2008, the Company raised operating capital from investors through the following transactions: In October, 2006, an affiliated investor (the Company President) loaned the Company $60,000 on an unsecured promissory note carrying 8% annual interest, maturing June 30, 2010. Without this immediate capital infusion, the company would not have been able to continue operations in the wake of the embezzlement discussed in Note 8 to the Financial Statements. In December, 2006, an affiliated investor purchased 215,000 units, for $150,000. Each unit was comprised of one share of restricted common stock and one 5-year warrant exercisable at $1.00. This purchase completed the Company’s existing private placement offering. In January, 2007, an unaffiliated existing shareholder exercised 100,000 options for 100,000 restricted common shares for $70,000 or $0.70 per share. In March, 2007, an unaffiliated investor purchased 25,000 shares of restricted common stock for $31,250 or $1.25 per share in a private placement. In April, 2007, an unaffiliated investor purchased 40,000 shares on the same terms, for $50,000. In July, 2007, another unaffiliated investor purchased 60,000 shares on the same terms, for $75,000, the April purchaser bought another 40,000 shares, again from the same offering, for $50,000, and a director loaned the Company $36,000 in the form of an unsecured demand note carrying 8% annual interest. In September, 2007, the January purchaser exercised options for 35,350 restricted common shares for $24,745, and an affiliate loaned the Company $88,056 on an unsecured note carrying 8% interest maturing December 15, 2007. No commissions were paid on these transactions. At June 30, 2008, all of the borrowings discussed above, with their accrued interest, have been paid off, excepting only the accrued interest and $55,000 remaining principal balance on the promissory note to the Company President. These debt reductions were made possible primarily by the $400,000 upfront license fee from Cequent, received in January, 2008. The company regards this fee as non-recurring in the ordinary course of business.

The Company reported shareholder equity of $65,969 as of June 30, 2008, as compared with $152,307 as of June 30, 2007.

The Company does not anticipate any need for additional equity capital infusions. We anticipate that licensing and product sales revenues, and borrowings will be sufficient to fund all of our operating activities and present growth plans. In the event that revenues fall short of our anticipation, or the Company decides to respond to expanding growth opportunities in the future, additional capital may be required. The Company cannot give any assurance that such additional capital would be available on terms acceptable to shareholders.

The Company is working on several product licensing opportunities that, if completed, have the potential to generate significant revenues beyond those figuring into our current plans. However, no assurance can be given as to whether these discussions will result in a completed transaction, nor can the Company give any assurances as to the timing or financial magnitude of these transactions.

- 13 -

The Company anticipates improvement in operating margins due to the proportional shift of our revenue mix toward royalties and fees described above, and a possible reduction in SG&A as we eliminate inventory and manufacturing of products that have been licensed to Cequent. In the event that these anticipations prove mistaken, the Company can provide shareholders with no assurance that any required additional capital will be available on terms acceptable to shareholders.

Our auditor expresses substantial doubt as to the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. He bases this doubt on our history of operating losses as of June 30, 2008. We have experienced negative cash flow from operations since our inception and we have expended, and expect to continue to expend, substantial funds to continue our research and development and marketing efforts. As a result, we have suffered recurring losses through June 30, 2008. Based on our current operating plans, management believes that proceeds from future revenues and future borrowings will be sufficient to meet operating needs for the foreseeable future. The actual funds that we will need to operate during this period will be determined by many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Lower than anticipated sales of our products or higher than anticipated expenses could require us to need additional financing sooner than expected. There is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining borrowed funds or selling additional shares of common stock to the public if necessary.

While a portion of total liabilities, approximately $55,000, is owed to present officers and/or directors, there can be no assurance that these officers/directors will not seek payment in the near term.

Inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company’s operations.

Item 7. Financial Statements.

- 14 -

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Financial Statements

June 30, 2008

(with Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Thereon)

- 15 -

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Index to Financial Statements

		Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008 and 2007		F-3

Statements of Operations, for the years ended
	June 30, 2008 and 2007	F-4

Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the period from
	July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2008	F-5

Statements of Cash Flows, for the years ended
	June 30, 2008 and 2007	F-6

Notes to financial statements		F-7

F - 1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

LGA Holdings, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of LGA Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LGA Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring operating losses since inception, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding this matter are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Cordovano and Honeck LLP

Cordovano and Honeck LLP

Englewood, Colorado

September 10, 2008

F - 2

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Balance Sheets

	For the Years Ended
	June 30,
	2008			2007
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	19,914		$	—
Accounts receivable (Note 1)		85,914			9,683
Inventory, at lower cost or market (Note 3)		303,048			165,851
Prepaid expenses		4,456			20,084
Total current assets		413,332			195,618

Property and equipment, at cost,
net of accumulated depreciation of $177,320 and $140,860 (Note 3)		119,728			135,709
Intangible assets, at cost,
net of accumulated amortization of $23,856 and $20,501 (Note 3)		96,790			97,777
Other assets		2,686			2,606

Total assets	$	632,536		$	431,709

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:
Bank overdraft	$	—		$	238
Accounts payable		57,679			93,199
Accrued payroll		39,825			123,160
Accrued interest, related party (Note 2)		7,833			2,804
Deferred revenue-current portion (Note 4)		100,000			—
Total current liabilities		205,337			219,401

Long-term liabilities:
Loan payable (Note 3)		106,391			—
Notes payable, related party (Note 2)		55,000			60,000
Deferred revenue-noncurrent portion (Note 4)		199,839			—
Total long-term liabilities		361,230			60,000

Total liabilities		566,567			279,401


Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)		—			—

Shareholders’ equity (Notes 2 and 5):
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding, 9,247,885 shares		9,182			8,973
Additional paid-in capital		2,409,204			1,754,066
Retained deficit		(2,352,417	)		(1,610,732	)

Total shareholders' equity		65,969			152,307

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	632,536		$	431,709

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F - 3

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Statements of Operations

	For the Years Ended
	June 30,
	2008			2007
Sales and Revenue:
Product sales	$	547,879		$	345,411
Royalty revenue (Note 4)		112,272			63,296

Total sales and revenues		660,151			408,707

Costs and expenses:
Costs of sales and revenue		417,597			261,996
Research and development		42,654			94,095
General and administrative		927,909			710,513

Total costs and expenses		1,388,161			1,066,604

Operating loss		(728,010	)		(657,897	)

Other income (expense):
Other income		90			229
Interest expense		(12,067	)		(5,748	)
Embezzlement expense, net of recoveries (Note 8)		(1,700	)		(44,764	)

Loss before income taxes		(741,686	)		(708,180	)

Income tax provision (Notes 1 and 6)		—			—

Net loss	$	(741,686	)	$	(708,180	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		9,011,826			8,703,345

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F - 4

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

					Additional
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Retained
	Shares		Par Value		Capital		Deficit			Total

Balance at July 1, 2006		8,592,960	$	8,593	$	1,150,918	$	(914,612	)	$	244,899
Adjustment for uncorrected immaterial
financial statement differences (Note 9)		—		—		—		12,061			12,061
Contributed interest (Note 2)		—		—		6,478		—			6,478
Common stock options
exercised at $.70 per share (Note 5)		100,000		100		69,900		—			70,000
Sale of units at $.70 per unit (Note 2)		215,000		215		149,785		—			150,000
Sale of common stock at $1.25 per share (Note 5)		65,000		65		81,185		—			81,250
Stock options granted (Notes 2 and 5)		—		—		295,800		—			295,800
Net loss		—		—		—		(708,180	)		(708,180	)

Balance at June 30, 2007		8,972,960		8,973		1,754,066		(1,610,731	)		152,308

Common stock options
exercised at $.71 per share (Note 5)		35,350		35		25,065		—			25,100
Common stock options
exercised at $.70 per share (Note 5)		73,352		73		51,274		—			51,347
Sale of common stock at $1.25 per share (Note 5)		100,000		100		124,900		—			125,000
Stock options granted (Notes 2 and 5)		—		—		453,900		—			453,900
Adjustment (Note 5)		66,223		—		—		—			—
Net loss		—		—		—		(741,686	)		(741,686	)

Balance at June 30, 2008		9,247,885	$	9,182	$	2,409,204	$	(2,352,417	)	$	65,969

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F - 5

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Statements of Cash flows

	For the Years Ended
	June 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(741,686	)	$	(708,180	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		39,815			31,638
Share-based payment (Notes 2 and 5)		453,900			295,800
Contributed interest (Note 2)		—			6,478
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables, inventory and other assets		(81,740	)		12,243
Payables, deferred income and other liabilities		185,775			(74,235	)
Net cash used in
operating activities		(143,936	)		(436,256	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of equipment and other assets		(22,848	)		(75,494	)

Net cash used in
investing activities		(22,848	)		(75,494	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from short-term borrowing, related party (Note 2)		124,056			—
Proceeds from debt, related party (Note 2)		—			60,000
Repayment of short-term borrowing, related party (Note 2)		(124,056	)		—
Repayment of short-term borrowing, other		(9,749	)		—
Repayment of debt, related party (Note 2)		(5,000	)		—
Proceeds from collection of stock
subscription receivable (Note 5)		—			150,500
Proceeds from sale of common stock (Notes 2 and 5)		201,447			301,250
Net cash provided by
financing activities		186,698			511,750

Net change in cash and
cash equivalents		19,914			—

Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of year		—			—

End of year	$	19,914		$	—

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes	$	—		$	—
Interest	$	—		$	—

Noncash investing and financing transactions:
Debt converted to accrued payroll (Note 2)	$	—		$	106,408
Purchase of inventory with loan payable	$	106,391		$	—

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F - 6

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

(1) Organization and summary of significant accounting policies

Organization, basis of presentation and Liquidity

LGA Holdings, Inc. (“LGA”, “We”, “Us” or “Our”) was incorporated in Colorado on April 14, 1998 as Let’s Go Aero, Inc. We develop intellectual property for the automotive, recreation vehicle and recreation industries. We also manufacture and distribute various types of specialty trailers and cargo carrying enhancements as well as related parts, accessories and services for the automobile, recreational vehicle and recreational equipment industries. Our specialty trailers are manufactured by third party vendors and assembled in our facilities in Colorado Springs. We sell our products directly to distributors, dealers, and end-user customers.

Going Concern

Inherent in our business are various risks and uncertainties, including historical operating losses and dependence upon strategic alliances. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

We have experienced negative cash flow from operations since our inception and we have expended, and expect to continue to expend, substantial funds to continue our research and development and marketing efforts. As a result, we have suffered recurring losses through June 30, 2008. Based on our current operating plans, management believes that proceeds from future revenues, future debt financing, and future sales of common stock will be sufficient to meet operating needs for the foreseeable future. The actual funds that we will need to operate during this period will be determined by many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Lower than anticipated sales of our products or higher than anticipated expenses could require us to need additional financing sooner than expected. There is no assurance that we will be successful in selling additional shares of common stock to the public. Our business plan projects profits during fiscal 2009.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 (“SFAS 107”), Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. SFAS 107 defines the fair value of financial instruments as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. The carrying value of financial instruments including cash, receivables, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable approximates their fair value at the reporting balance sheet date due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. The fair market value of long-term debt cannot be determined due to a lack of comparability of similar market instruments.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. The more significant estimates are used for such items as: recoverability of inventory and property and equipment, valuation allowance for doubtful accounts, reserves for warranty, and fair valuation of stock options. As better information becomes available or as actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates are revised. Ultimate results could differ from these estimates.

F - 7

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2008, there were no cash equivalents.

Concentrations

We purchase our plastic shells from two suppliers. The purchases represented approximately 5% and 20% of cost of sales for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Although there are a limited number of manufacturers of plastic shells, management believes that other suppliers could provide similar shells on comparable terms.

Accounts Receivable

Trade receivable consists of amounts due from customers, which are mainly end-users and dealers. We generally consider accounts more than 30 days old to be past due. We allow for estimated losses on accounts receivable based on prior bad debt experience and a review of existing receivables. Bad debt recoveries are charged against the allowance account as realized. At June 30, 2008, we considered accounts receivable to be fully collectible; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined on average cost basis, or market. Raw materials consist of the cost of materials required to produce trailers and accessories and to support parts sales and service.

Prepaid expenses

Prepaid expenses primarily include the unamortized portion of annual casualty and third party liability insurance premiums. These premiums are amortized to expense over the insurance year.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures that extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized. Repairs, maintenance and renewals that do not extend the useful lives of the assets are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is provided for financial reporting purposes using straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 7 years for machinery, tooling, furniture and equipment.

Certain tooling used to make our plastic shells is held for use at our subcontractors’ facilities in Denver, Colorado and Middlebury, Indiana.

Intangible Assets

We have patents issued and pending to protect our intellectual property. These patents relate to how cargo can be attached and carried on a vehicle’s hitch receiver, frame, or body surface. Patent costs are amortized on a straight-line basis and charged to amortization expense over the expected useful life of the patent. Costs of patent applications are deferred until the patent is granted. We will begin amortization when the patent is granted.

F - 8

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate our long-lived assets, including related intangibles, of identifiable business activities for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate, in management's judgment, that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether impairment has occurred is based on management's estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets as compared to the carrying value of the assets. If impairment has occurred, estimating the fair value for the assets and recording a provision for loss if the carrying value is greater than fair value determine the amount of the impairment recognized. For assets identified to be disposed of in the future, the carrying value of these assets is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to sell to determine if impairment is required. Until the assets are disposed of, an estimate of the fair value is re-determined when related events or circumstances change.

When determining whether impairment of one of our long-lived assets has occurred, we must estimate the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset or asset group. Our estimate of cash flows is based on assumptions that could change in the future.

Any significant variance in any of the above assumptions or factors could materially affect our cash flows, which could require us to record an impairment of an asset. No impairment charges were recognized during each of the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from the sale of trailers and accessories when there is persuasive evidence that title and risks of ownership are transferred to the customer, which generally is upon shipment or customer pick-up. Accordingly, no provision for sales allowances or returns is normally required except in unusual circumstances.

Revenue from sales of parts is recognized when the part has been shipped. Revenues related to shipping and deliveries are included as a component of net sales and the related shipping costs are included as a component of cost of sales.

Royalty income is recognized based on the terms specified in contractual agreements.

Product Warranty

Our products are covered by product warranties for one year after the date of sale. At the time of sale, the Company recognizes estimated warranty costs, based on prior history and expected future claims, by a charge to cost of sales and records an accrued liability. The accrued liability is reduced as actual warranty costs are paid and is evaluated periodically to validate previous estimates and known requirements and adjusted as necessary. At June 30, 2008, we have not accrued a reserve for warranty expense as management determined the amount to be immaterial with respect to overall operations and financial position.

F - 9

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

Advertising Costs

All advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were $65,068 and $60,896 for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses were incurred in fiscal 2008 and 2007 and totaled $42,654 and $94,095, respectively. R&D costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

Stock-based Compensation

Effective July 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that compensation related to all stock-based awards, including stock options, be recognized in the financial statements based on their estimated grant-date fair value. We have previously recorded stock compensation pursuant to the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25, whereby compensation was recorded related to performance share and unrestricted share awards and no compensation was recognized for most stock option awards. We are using the modified prospective application method of adopting SFAS No. 123R, whereby the estimated fair value of unvested stock awards granted prior to July 1, 2005 will be recognized as compensation expense in periods subsequent to June 30, 2005, based on the same valuation method used in our prior pro forma disclosures. We have estimated expected forfeitures, as required by SFAS No. 123R, and we are recognizing compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. Compensation expense is amortized over the estimated service period, which is the shorter of the award’s time vesting period or the derived service period as implied by any accelerated vesting provisions when the common stock price reaches specified levels. All compensation must be recognized by the time the award vests. The cumulative effect of initially adopting SFAS No. 123R was immaterial.

Loss Per Share

SFAS 128, Earnings Per Share, requires presentation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share on the face of the statements of operations for all entities with complex capital structures. Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted during the period. Dilutive securities having an anti-dilutive effect on diluted earnings per share are excluded from the calculation. At June 30, 2008, the company has options outstanding that could be exercised representing a total of 3,505,310 additional shares. All have been excluded from the weighted average share calculation because they would be anti-dilutive.

F - 10

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

The weighted average number of common shares outstanding was calculated based upon post-split shares for all periods presented.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48, which is an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” provides guidance on the manner in which tax positions taken or to be taken on tax returns should be reflected in an entity’s financial statements prior to their resolution with taxing authorities. The Company is required to adopt FIN 48 during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FIN 48 and has not yet determined the impact, if any; this interpretation may have on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 apply under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. We are required to adopt SFAS 157 effective for our fiscal year 2009. The impact on our financial statements has not been determined.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No.159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This statement permits companies to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. We are required to adopt SFAS 159 effective for our fiscal year 2009. The impact on our financial statements has not been determined.

(2) Related Party Transactions

In September 2007, an affiliate loaned the Company $88,056 in the form of an unsecured note carrying 8% annual interest, which matured on December 15, 2007. It was agreed that if the note is not paid on the due date, the entire principal and accrued interest shall continue to draw interest at the rate of 8%. In January 2008, the principal of $88,056 and accrued interests of $2,238 were paid in full.

In July 2007, a director loaned the Company $36,000 in the form of an unsecured demand note carrying 8% annual interest. In January 2008, the principal of $36,000 and accrued interests of $1,433 were paid in full.

During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company signed promissory notes totaling $60,000 payable to its President, for working capital purposes. The promissory notes bear interest rates of 8% per annum and are due on June 30, 2010. During the year ended June 30, 2008, the principal of $5,000 was paid. We incurred interest expense of $4,700 on the notes for the year ended June 30, 2008. At June 30, 2008, accrued interest related to the promissory notes totaled $7,833 and is reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

In March 2007, we granted to one of our directors an option to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The option carries an exercise price of $1.75 per share and vested at the date of grant. We determined the fair value of the options at $1.65 per share and recorded share-based payment $165,000 in accordance with SFAS 123R. See footnote 5.

In December 2006, we conducted a private placement offering whereby we sold 215,000 units to an affiliate at $.70 per unit or $150,000. Each unit is comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and one option to purchase the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share.

F - 11

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

In September 2006, our Board of Directors approved the reclassification of $106,408 from notes payable to officers to accrued payroll. Accrued interest related to the notes payable in the amount of $6,478 as of June 30, 3006 was forgiven by the officers and recorded as contributed capital and is shown in the accompanying financial statements.

(3) Balance Sheet Components

Inventory

At June 30, 2008, inventory consisted of:

Raw materials	$	77,710
Finished goods		225,339
	$	303,049

In February, 2008, we purchased 60 completed GearWagon 125 Sport Utility Trailers costing $116,140 from our outsource manufacturer, Elkhart Sales and Service (“ESS”) of Elkhart, Indiana. We financed the purchase through ESS under terms calling for monthly interest payments at 6 percent and principal payments are due upon the sale of trailers. The balance of loan payable, including accrued interest, as of June 30, 2008 is $106,391. All interest under the loan has been charged to expense in the accompanying financial statements.

Property and Equipment

At June 30, 2008, major classes of property and equipment were:

Leasehold improvements	$	4,212
Furniture and fixtures		25,377
Equipment		94,200
Tooling, held offsite		173,259
		297,048
Less: accumulated depreciation		(177,320	)
	$	119,728

Depreciation expense during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $36,460 and $30,050, respectively.

F - 12

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

Intangible Assets

At June 30, 2008, intangible assets consisted of:

			Weighted
			Average
			Amortization
	Total		Period
Patents, net of $23,856 in accumulated
amortization	$	43,201	13 years
Deferred patent application costs		53,589		n/a
	$	96,790

Estimated annual amortization expenses for the next 5 years are as follows for years ending June 30:

2009	$	3,172
2010	$	3,172
2011	$	3,172
2012	$	3,172
2013	$	3,172

Amortization expense during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $3,355 and $1,588, respectively.

(4) Unearned Revenue

In January 2008, we executed a license agreement (the “Agreement”) with Cequent Towing Products (“Cequent”), a division of Trimas Corporation. Under the terms of the Agreement, we granted Cequent exclusive manufacturing and sales rights to our entire line of hitch-mounted cargo carriers, the Silent Hitch Pin, and the “Pixie” bicycle carrier, for a two-year period in exchange for an $400,000 upfront fee and royalty rights for the life of the related patents. Following the two-year exclusive period, Cequent will have non-exclusive rights for the life of the related patents. The Agreement also gives Cequent a right of first refusal on any license agreement that the Company may consider with other parties for the Company’s GearWagon 125 and Little Giant trailer products. We recognize revenue from the upfront fee on a straight-line basis over the two-year exclusive license period. We recognized $100,000 in royalty revenue related to this license in fiscal year 2008. The balance of unearned revenue was $299,839 and $-0- at June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

We expect our revenue mix to shift from direct sales to distributors, dealers, and end users, to royalty and fee income for the foreseeable future.

(5) Shareholders’ Deficit

Features of Preferred Stock

Our preferred stock may be issued from time-to-time in one or more series. Our Board of Directors is authorized to (1) divide the preferred stock into series; (2) establish the number of preferred shares in a series; and (3) fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of any series of our preferred stock.

F - 13

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

Sale of Common Stock

The adjustment of 66,223 shares shown in the Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity is to correct the number of shares issued and outstanding in connection with the reverse split effected on 2004. We determined that no restatement of prior year financial statements is required since there is no impact on earnings per share calculation.

In April 2008, an unaffiliated existing investor exercised options at $.70 to acquire 30,204 common shares of the Company. Cash proceeds to the Company were $21,143.

In January 2008, an unaffiliated existing investor exercised options at $.70 to acquire 43,148 common shares of the Company. Cash proceeds to the Company were $30,204.

In September 2007, a former employee exercised options at $0.71 to acquire 35,350 common shares of the Company. Cash proceeds to the Company were $25,100.

In July 2007, two unaffiliated investors purchased a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement offering for total cash proceeds of $125,000 or $1.25 per share. No commissions were paid in connection with this transaction.

Stock Options

On November 26, 2007, the Company granted to certain officers and certain employees options to purchase an aggregate of 730,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The options vested on the date of grant and expire on November 26, 2012. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.51 per share on the date of grant. The Company valued the options at $0.51 per share, or $372,300, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation of $372,300 was recorded in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	3.23%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor.	287.00%
Weighted average expected life	5 years

On November 26, 2007, the Company granted an officer and two vendors options to purchase an aggregate of 160,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. The options vested on the date of grant and expire on November 26, 2017. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.51 per share on the date of grant. The Company valued the options at $0.51 per share, or $81,600 in accordance with SFAS 123(R). Stock-based compensation of $81,600 was recorded in the accompanying financial statements.

F - 14

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	3.83%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor	287.00%
Weighted average expected life	10 years

Total compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements at June 30, 2008 and 2007:

	2008		2007
Stock options, related party	$	423,300	$	165,000
Stock options, other		30,600		130,800
Total compensation cost		453,900		295,800
Income tax		—		—
Net compensation cost	$	453,900	$	295,800

At June 30, 2008, all compensation costs have been recognized, as all options granted were fully vested on the grant date.

A summary of changes in the number of stock options outstanding for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

		Weighted	Weighted
		Average	Average
		Exercise	Remaining	Aggregate
		Price	Contractual	Intrinsic
	Shares	Per Share	Life	Value
Outstanding at June 30, 2006	2,552,547	$0.70	6.28 yeaers

Granted	395,000	$1.34	6.6 years
Exercised	(100,000)	$0.70	N/A
Cancelled/Expired	(104,952)	$0.70	N/A
Outstanding at June 30, 2007	2,742,595	$0.79	5.8 years	$ 333,250
Granted.	890,000	$1.50	5.32 years
Exercised.	(35,350)	$0.71	N/A
Exercised	(73,352)	$0.70	N/A
Cancelled/Expired	(18,585)	$0.70	N/A

Outstanding at June 30, 2008	3,505,308	$0.97	5.25 years	$ 333,250

Exercisable at June 30, 2008	3,505,308	$0.97	5.25 years	$ 333,250

F - 15

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

(6) Income Taxes

A reconciliation of U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to the effective rate follows for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

	June 30,
	2008			2007

U.S. statutory federal rat		34.00	%		34.00	%
State income tax rate		3.06	%		3.06	%
Deferred income		0.00	%		0.00	%
Net operating loss for which no tax
benefit is currently available		-37.06	%		-37.06	%
		0.00	%		0.00	%

At June 30, 2008, deferred tax assets consisted of net tax asset of $2,371,429 due to net operating loss carryforward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $6,488,009, which was fully allowed for in the valuation allowance of $2,371,429. The valuation allowance offsets the net deferred tax asset for which there is no assurance of recovery. The change in the valuation allowance for the year ended June 30, 2008 was $274,838. The net operating loss carryforward will expire through 2028.

The valuation allowance is evaluated at the end of each year, considering positive and negative evidence about whether the deferred tax asset will be realized. At that time, the allowance will either be increased or reduced; reduction could result in the complete elimination of the allowance if positive evidence indicates that the value of the deferred tax assets is no longer impaired and the allowance is no longer required.

(7) Commitments

We lease some of our office space under a non-cancelable operating lease through May 2011. Future minimum lease payments are as follow:

Date	Amount
6/30/2009	$	36,773
6/30/2010	$	18,630
6/30/2011	$	17,854

We recorded rent expense in the amount of $76,686 and $36,892 for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(8) Embezzlement

The Company suffered an embezzlement of $72,801 for the year ended June 30, 2006, $44,764 for the year ended June 30, 2007, and $1,700 for the year ended June 30, 2008. We have implemented internal control procedures, which we believe will prevent any future losses.

F - 16

LGA HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

(9) Adjustment for Immaterial Uncorrected Financial Statement Differences

During the year ended June 30, 2007, we evaluated and quantified accumulated immaterial uncorrected financial statement differences through June 30, 2006, in accordance with SAB 108, as follows:

	Financial Statements Effect
	Amount of Over (Under) Statement of:
	Total Assets			Total Liabilities		Loss Before Taxes			Net Loss			Net Loss Per Share

Inventory	$	(7,658	)	$	-	$	7,658		$	7,658		$	0.00
Accrued interest		-			12,062		(12,062	)		(12,062	)	$	(0.00	)

		(7,658	)		12,062		(4,404	)		(4,404	)	$	(0.00	)

Net Unadjusted
Audit Differences—June 30, 2006		(7,658	)		12,062		(4,404	)		(4,404	)	$	(0.00	)
Net Audit Differences	$	(7,658	)	$	12,062	$	(4,404	)	$	(4,404	)	$	(0.00	)

During the year ended June 30, 2006, basic accounting errors were made and were left uncorrected as they were considered immaterial to our overall financial statements. The overstatement of interest expense is corrected in 2007 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the accompanying condensed financial statement. The difference in inventory was subsequently adjusted through our physical inventory count during the year ended June 30, 2007.

(10) Subsequent Events- Financing

In August 2008, we borrowed $24,000 for working capital.

F - 17

Item 8. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not Applicable

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures.

Prior to September, 2006, LGA’s internal disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) were not effective. During the audit of the June 30, 2006 financial statements, the auditors discovered indications of embezzlement by the Company’s bookkeeper. The embezzled amount was approximately $134,000 and occurred between June, 2005, and October, 2006.

Internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) should be adequate and effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and include those policies and procedures that:

(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

(2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and

(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

LGA did not have formal internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2006, and through September, 2006, when the embezzlement was discovered. The weaknesses in internal controls and procedures that were exploited by the Company’s bookkeeper were (1) a lack of segregation of duties over cash management (including credit cards) and (2) insufficient supervision by management over accounting functions.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal controls over financial reporting were implemented in late 2006 and the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that they are now effective.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that disclosure controls and procedures are minimal, but also effective due to the Company’s small size and the regular communications among its seven full-time employees.

- 16 -

Item 8A(T) Controls and Procedures.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on advice from our auditor following our Fiscal 2008 audit. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2008. During Fiscal 2008, substantial changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management's report.

Item 8B. Other Information.

None

Part III

Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Directors serve terms of 1 year or until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.

Name	Age	Position	Director Since

Marty Williams*	48	Chief Executive Officer,	June 2004
		President Director

Sara Williams*	39	Secretary, Treasurer,	June 2004
		Director

Eric Nickerson	57	Director, Controller	June 1990

Matthew Drabczyk	49	Vice President Engineering,	May 2006
		Director

__________

* Marty Williams and Sara Williams are husband and wife.

- 17 -

MARTY WILLIAMS, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director. Mr. Williams was appointed to his positions upon the acquisition of Aero by LGA effective June 30, 2004. Mr. Williams has been Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director of Aero since its inception in 1998. At Aero he is responsible for establishing and maintaining the corporate mission and culture. He is responsible for product creation, strategic planning, and the entrepreneurial spirit. He also directs and coordinates Aero's financing to provide funding for new and continuing operations. Mr. Williams' professional experience includes many different areas in the securities industry where he applied his knowledge of small business operations, finance, strategic development and business modeling. As an independent broker at Schneider Securities, Inc., Denver, Colorado, from 1988 to 1991 and again from 1993 to 1999, Marty was principally involved in development of private placement offerings for early stage companies and the subsequent sales of those offerings. From 1991 to 1993 he was a stock broker with RAF Financial, Denver, Colorado. He has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, University of South Dakota.

SARA WILLIAMS, Secretary, Treasurer, Director. Ms. Williams was appointed to her positions upon the acquisition of Aero by LGA effective June 30, 2004. Ms. Williams has been Treasurer and a Director of Aero since its inception in 1998. She has been Secretary of Aero since June 30, 2004. At Aero Ms. Williams manages daily business flow, business development, product inquiries, marketing, promotions, account management, dealer relations, sales and customer service, order fulfillment, and shipping. Mrs. Williams' professional experience includes many areas in sales, advertising, software development, operations, and product development. She has been involved in direct sales, account management and start-up business management in the areas of print advertising, new business development, customer relations, and marketing. At Sunset Publishing Corporation, Menlo Park, California, as a Direct Sales Representative from 1993 to 1995 and 1996 to 1998, Mrs. Williams was responsible for generating sales of new advertising programs and account management. While working for Saligent, Inc., Colorado Spring, Colorado for a short period in 1995, Mrs. Williams was occupied with inside sales management, program development, supervision and training. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, The Colorado College.

ERIC J. NICKERSON has served as a Director of LGA since June of 1990 and as a Director of Aero since April 2001. Mr. Nickerson joined the Company in the position of Controller in November, 2006. Mr. Nickerson was a member of the faculty of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York from 1989 to 1993. In June 1993, Mr. Nickerson retired as a United States Air Force officer. Currently, Mr. Nickerson is a private investor and directs personal accounts and an investing partnership, Third Century II. Third Century II is a major shareholder in LGA.

MATTHEW DRABCZYK has served as Vice President and Director of LGA since May, 2006. Mr. Drabczyk has been President of Restaurant Interiors, Inc. for more than five years where he is responsible for sales, engineering and accounting. Restaurant Interiors constructs and installs commercial dining facilities.

Legal Proceedings

None.

Audit Committee

LGA does not have an audit committee and neither LGA nor Aero has a financial expert on their respective Boards of Directors or as an employee. LGA's Board of Directors acts as its audit committee. LGA is a company with annual revenue of less than $700,000 and its accounting is relatively simple. Therefore, the Company's management did not believe having a financial expert offered shareholders much benefit considering the costs that would have been involved. See Item 8A, above. None of the Board of Directors is independent as defined in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.

- 18 -

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The following table sets forth information determined by LGA with respect to the indicated person's requirements to file Forms 3, 4 and 5 for LGA's most recent fiscal year.

Name	Number of Late Reports	Number of Transactions That Were Not Reported	Known Failures to File

Eric Nickerson	0	1	1

Third Century II	0	0	0

Marty Williams	0	1	1

Sara Williams	0	1	1

Floyd Murray	0	1	1

Code of Ethics

LGA has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Company has only 7 full time employees and limited revenues. Its three principal officers are all substantial shareholders who together own 60% of the company’s common shares, and constitute 75% of the Board of directors. Mr. & Mrs. Williams and Mr. Nickerson do not believe that the Company presently needs written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

(1) Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

(2) Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a small business issuer files with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by the small business issuer;

(3) Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

(4) The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

(5) Accountability for adherence to the code.

Mr. & Mrs. Williams and Mr. Nickerson believe that they act ethically with respect to the above categories despite the lack of a written code of ethics. They further believe that current internal controls adequately preclude any other employee from perpetrating material wrongdoing against the Company.

- 19 -

Item 10. Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth information with respect to all officers of LGA and Aero who received $100,000 or more of annual compensation for all services rendered in all capacities in the three most recent fiscal years and for the CEO regardless of compensation.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Bonus	Stock Awards	Option Awards	Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings	All Other Compensation	Total
Marty Williams CEO, President, Director	2008	$48,000	0	0	$255,000	0	0	0	$303,000
	2007	$48,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	$48,000

Eric Nickerson Controller, Director	2008	$30,000	0	0	$102,000	0	0	0	$132,000
	2007	$18,750	0	0	0	0	0	0	$18,750

Matthew Drabczyk, Vice President Engineering, Director	2008	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	2007	0	0	0	$165,000	0	0	0	$165,000

- 20 -

The following table contains information regarding equity awards outstanding at the end of the last completed fiscal year held by the named executive officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards at fiscal Year End

Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Marty Williams	500,000	0	0	0.70	2010	0	0	0	0
Marty Williams	400,000	0	0	1.50	2012	0	0	0	0
Sara Williams	500,000	0	0	0.70	2010	0	0	0	0
Sara Williams	100,000	0	0	1.50	2012	0	0	0	0
Matthew Drabczyk	250,000	0	0	0.70	2015	0	0	0	0
Matthew Drabczyk	100,000	0	0	1.75	2017	0	0	0	0
Eric Nickerson	200,000	0	0	1.50	2012	0	0	0	0
Third Century II	215,000	0	0	1.00	2012	0	0	0	0

Marty Williams

100,000

1.50

2017

Director Compensation

Directors as a group are currently not compensated as such for their services.

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table provides information as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of the small business issuer are authorized for issuance.

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	1,635,000	$1.01	189,635
Equity plans not approved by security holders *	1,870,308	$.93	0
Total	3,505,308	$..97	189,653

- 21 -

The following table contains information as of September 23, 2008, summarizing the beneficial ownership of LGA common stock by (1) each person known to LGA to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its issued and outstanding common stock, (2) LGA's executive officers and directors individually, and (3) all LGA's executive officers and directors as a group. Except as stated in the footnotes to the table, each of these persons exercises sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock listed for that person.

Name and Address	Position	Number of LGA Common Shares Held	Percentage of Outstanding Share Held


Marty Williams (1), (2)	President, Chief	3,454,999	31.8%
5565 Teakwood Terrace	Executive Officer,
Colorado Springs, CO 80918	Director

Sara Williams (1), (3)	Secretary,
5565 Teakwood Terrace	Treasurer,	3,454,999	31.8%
Colorado Springs, CO 80918	Director

Eric J. Nickerson (4)
1711 Chateau Ct.	Director	4,064,365	42.1%
Fallston, MD 21047

Matthew Drabczyk (5)	Vice President
Restaurant Interiors	Engineering,
5530 Joliet St.	Director	608,886	6.3%
Denver, CO 80239

All Officers and Directors as a Group (3 persons) (6)	NA	8,128,250	70.0%

Floyd Murray
13020 Caraway Dr.	NA	2,025,921	21.4%
Sun City West, AZ 85375

Third Century II
1711 Chateau Ct. (7)	NA	3,692,953	39.0%
Falston, MD 21047

________________

(1) Sara Williams and Marty Williams are husband and wife.

(2) Includes 1,854,999 shares owned as joint tenant with Sara Williams, options to acquire 1,000,000 shares and options to acquire 600,000 shares owned by Sara Williams.

(3) Includes 1,854,999 shares owned as joint tenant with Marty Williams, options to acquire 600,000 shares and options to acquire 1,000,000 shares owned by Marty Williams.

(4) Includes 3,692,953 shares deemed owned by Third Century II. Mr. Nickerson is Senior Partner of the investment company Third Century II. Mr. Nickerson disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the shares and options owned by Third Century II.

(5) Includes options to acquire 350,000 shares.

(6) The Directors are Marty Williams, Sara Williams, Eric J. Nickerson and Matthew Drabczyk and includes the shares deemed directly or indirectly beneficially owned by each of them.

(7) Includes options to acquire 215,000 shares.

- 22 -

Note: Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares subject to options, warrants and convertible notes currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person or entity holding such securities, but are not outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person or entity. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Please refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In July 2007, a director loaned the Company $36,000 in the form of an unsecured demand note carrying 8% annual interest. In January 2008, the principal and accrued interests were paid in full.

We incurred interest expense of $11,172 on the notes for the year ended June 30, 2008. At June 30, 2008, accrued interest related to the promissory notes totaled $7,833 and is reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

In March 2007, we granted to Matt Drabczyk, a Director of the Company, an option to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The option carries an exercise price of $1.75 per share and vested at the date of grant. We determined the fair value of the options at $1.65 per share and recorded share-based payment $165,000 in accordance with SFAS 123R. See footnote 5.

- 23 -

In December 2006, we conducted a private placement offering whereby we sold 215,000 units to Third Century II at $.70 per unit or $150,000. Each unit comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and one option to purchase the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share. This transaction was part of a private placement that was available to other investors on the same terms. Mr. Nickerson, Controller and a Director of the Company, is Senior Partner of Third Century II. The sale of the call option described in note 2 to the financial statements was to Third Century II.

During the year ended June 30, 2007, Mr. Williams, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and an Officer, loaned the Company $60,000 at 8% interest with principal and interest due June 30, 2010.

In September 2006, the Company reclassified $106,408 from a note payable to Marty and Sara Williams to accrued payroll. This was a reversal of an earlier transaction in order to avoid having to restate earlier financial statements that incorrectly described the transaction. The accrued interest of $6,478 was forgiven by the Williams and deemed a contribution to the Company’s capital.

Item 13. Exhibits.

10.1 - License Agreement with Cequent Towing Products, Inc.

31.1 - A Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.2 - A Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

32.1 - A Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350

32.2 - A Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of LGA's and Aero's annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the registrant's Form 10-QSB or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were $37,900 for 2007 and $22,210 for 2008.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrant's financial statements and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A were $-0- for 2007 and $-0- for 2008.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $-0- for 2007 and $-0- for 2008.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A were $-0-for 2007 and $-0- for 2008.

Audit Committee Policies

Neither LGA nor Aero has an audit committee. Such authority is exercised by the full Boards of Directors of each company. The board has delegated hiring authority to the Company President. All directors are intimately involved with the day-to-day operations of the Company, which include its financial operations. Therefore, all Directors are aware of and involved with the engagement of the auditor. Neither Board currently has any pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7)(i) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X; or (ii) approved any services described in each of Items 9(e)(2) through 9(e)(4) of Schedule 14A that were subject to approval by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

Supplemental information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act By Non-reporting Issuers.

No annual report or proxy material has been sent to security holders.

- 24 -

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LGA Holdings, Inc.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Marty Williams

Marty Williams, Chief Executive Officer, President

Date September 29, 2008

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Marty Williams

Marty Williams, Chief Executive Office, Director

Date September 29, 2008

By: /s/ Sara Williams

Sara Williams, Treasurer (principal financial officer), Director

Date September 29, 2008

By: /s/ Eric Nickerson

Eric Nickerson, Controller (principal financial officer), Director

Date September 29, 2008

By: /s/ Matthew Drabczyk

Matthew Drabczyk, Director

Date September 29, 2008

- 25 -

LGA Holdings, INC 10-K