~~UNITED~~U.S. ~~STATES~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______

For the ~~transition~~quarterly period ~~from~~ended June ~~_______~~30, ~~to _______~~ 2013

Commission file number 000-54548

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		45-5553453
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200, Foster City, California 94404

(Address of principal executive offices)

(650) 283-2653

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Large Accelerated Filer o		Accelerated Filer o		Non-Accelerated Filer o		Smaller Reporting Company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of the common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $0.0001 par value: 3141,000,000 shares outstanding as of ~~.February~~August 1314, 2013.

INDEX

		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited):		3

	Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and March 31, 2013 (audited)		3

	Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and period from inception (February 6, 2012) through June 30, 2013 (unaudited)		4

	Statements of Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)		5

	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and period from inception (February 6, 2012) through June 30, 2013 (unaudited)		6

	Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)		7

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		22

Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures		22

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION:

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		24

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		24

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		24

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		24

Item 4.	(Reserved and Removed)		24

Item 5.	Other Information		24

Item 6.	Exhibits		24

	Signatures		25

		Page(s)
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited):		3
	Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 (unaudited) and March 31, 2012 (audited)		3
	Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2012 and period from inception (February 6, 2012) through December 31, 2012(unaudited)		4
	Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and period from inception (February 6, 2012) through December 31, 2012 (unaudited)		5
	Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)		6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		19
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures		20
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION:
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		20
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		20
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		20
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		20
Item 4.	(Reserved and Removed)		20
Item 5.	Other Information		20
Item 6.	Exhibits		20
	Signatures		21

- 2 -

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			March 31,
	June 30,			March 31,
	2012			2012
	2013			2013
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	~~778~~49		$	~~200~~53
Total current assets		~~778~~49			~~200~~53
Other asset – exploration rights		3,000,000			-
Total assets	$	49		$	53
Total assets	$	3,000,778		$	200
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Due to shareholder	$	~~104~~103,~~798~~923			-104,798
Due to Greentech Mining Utah		3,000,000			-
Total liabilities	$	103,923			104,798
Total liabilities	$	3,104,798			-
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		-			-
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 5,000,000 and 41,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively		4,100			3,100
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 5,000,000 and 31,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively		3,100			500
Additional paid-in capital		1,375			1,500
Additional paid-in capital		1,500			1,500
Accumulated deficit		(109,349	)		(109,345	)
Accumulated deficit		(108,620	)		(1,800	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(103,874	)		(104,745	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(104,020	)		200
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit	$	49		$	53
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	3,000,778		$	200

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

- 3 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~STATEMENTS~~CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

	Three months ended December 31, 2012			Nine months ended December 31, 2012			Inception (February 6, 2012) through December 31 (Cumulative)
							February 6, 2012
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—
							(inception)
Operating expenses
	For The Periods Ended						through
General and administrative		33,293			106,820			(108,620	)
	June 30,						June 30,
Net loss		(33,293	)	$	(106,820	)	$	(108,620	)
	2013			2012			2013
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	-		$	-
Revenues	$	-		$	-		$	-
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted	$	31,000,000		$	22,835,766
Expenses
Operating Expenses		-			-
Professional fees		-			-			-
Public expense								-
General and administrative		4			1,800			109,349
Total operating expenses		4			1,800			109,349
Net Loss	$	(4	)	$	(1,800	)	$	(109,349	)
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
WEIGHTEDAVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED		41,000,000			5,000,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

- 4 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(AAn ~~Development~~Exploration Stage Company)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ~~STOCKHOLDER~~STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock
	Shares		Amount			APIC		Deficit		Total
Balance Prior to Inception		-	$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-

Issuance of Common Stock -Founders for cash		5,000,000		500			1,500		-		2,000
Net loss									(1,800)		(1,800)
Balance at March 31, 2012		5,000,000		500			1,500		(1,800)		200

Tender of shares by founder, June 26, 2012 at $.0001 per share		(1,500,000)		(150	)		-		-		150
Issuance of Common Stock under consulting agreement June 27, 2012, at $.0001 per share		1,000,000		100			(100)				-
Issuance of Common Stock under subscription agreement with Novus Aurum Trust, June 26, 2012, at $.0001 per share		26,500,000		2,650			-		-		2,650
Net loss									(107,545)		(107,545)
Balance at March 31, 2013		31,000,000		3,100			1,500		(109,345)		(104,745)
Issuance of Common Stock –Debt Settlement		10,000,000		1,000			(125)				875
Net loss									(4)		(4)
Balance at June 30, 2013		41,000,000		4,100			1,375		(109,349)		(103,874)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

- 5 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(AAn ~~Development~~Exploration Stage Company)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

							Inception (February 6, 2012) through June 30,
	Three months ended June 30, 2013			Three months end June 30, 2012			2013 (Cumulative)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net loss	$	(4	)	$	(1,800	)	$	(109,349	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(4	)		(1,800	)		(109,349	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Due to shareholder								103,923
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		-			2,000			5,475
Net cash provided by financing activities					2,000			109,398
Net increase in cash		(4	)		200			49

Cash at beginning of period		53			-			-

Cash at end of period		49			200			49

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing transactions:					-			-

Shares issuance for debt settlement		875			-			-

Share issuance for interest expense		125			-			-

	Nine months ended December 31, 2012			Inception (February 6, 2012) through December 31, 2012 (Cumulative)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(106,820	)		(108,620	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Due to shareholder		104,798			104,798
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,022	)		(3,822	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		2,600			4,600
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,600			4,600
Net increase in cash		578			778
Cash at beginning of period		200
Cash at end of period	$	778			778
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:
Exploration rights purchased on short term debt	$	3,000,000		$	3,000,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5- 6 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~Notes~~NOTES toTO ~~Financial~~CONDENSED ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. ~~Background~~- ~~Information~~ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY:

Greentech Mining International, Inc. (“the Company” “GMI” and “Greentech”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 6, 2012 under the name Accelerated Acquisitions XVIII, Inc. The Company was formed as a “shell company” with no operations while it sought new business opportunities. The Company changed its name to Greentech Mining International, Inc. on June 25, 2012. On September 17, 2012, we entered into an Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”), both entities are under common control, pursuant to which the Company received exclusive rights that consists of all 671 acres of Section 36, Township 29 South, Range 11 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, in Wayne County, Utah upon which an operating gravimetric circuit (system to separate minerals by weight) has been built on the private property. In addition, the agreement includes four Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) mining claim groups totaling 3,940 acres to:

Exploring and prospecting for, developing, mining, excavating, leaching, milling, processing and smelting, whether by open pit, underground, strip mining, solution mining, heap leaching, or any other methods deemed desirable by the Company in its sole discretion, all minerals, ores, valuable rocks, rare earths and materials of all kinds, including mine dumps and tailings (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Contracted Substances”);

Processing, concentrating, beneficiating, treating, milling, smelting, shipping, selling and otherwise disposing of the Contracted Substances and receiving the proceeds of any such sale;

Erecting, constructing, maintaining, using and operating any such buildings, structures, machinery, facilities and equipment the Company deems necessary, except that modifications to existing structures machinery, facilities and equipment require the prior approval of the Owner; and

Engaging in any other activity that Contractor deems reasonable and necessary to achieve the foregoing purposes.

As a result of entering into these agreements and undertaking efforts to begin exploration, mining and mineral distribution operations, we have ceased to be a shell company. The Company operates in one reportable business segment, the mining exploration and processing of precious metals.

The Company is currently in the ~~development~~exploration stage. All activities of the Company to date relate to its organization and acquiring rights to explore and produce precious metals. The Company does not have any known ore reserves according to the definition of ore reserves under Industry Guide 7 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

~~Greentech~~The ~~Mining~~Company did not recognize any assets or liabilities related to the Option Agreement signed on September 17, 2012. The Owner did not pass the ownership of the related assets until the first payment of one million dollar has been paid in the future and ~~Milling~~this ~~Assets~~has not occurred. Also, the carrying value of the Option Agreement is not an arm’s length transaction due to the fact both the Company and Owners are commonly controlled by Mr. Matthew Neher. Therefore, the carrying value of the Option Agreement cannot be determined until actual consideration has been paid.

WeMineral ~~have~~Properties ~~recorded the estimated fair value of the Greentech mining~~ and ~~milling~~Milling ~~assets as an aggregate amount on our condensed balance sheet. The assets include the land, water rights and the milling facility (the buildings and equipment).~~Assets

Mineral ~~Properties~~property and milling asset acquisition costs are recorded at cost as an aggregate amount on our condensed balance sheet and the mineral properties are deferred until the viability of the property is determined. Exploration, mineral property evaluation, option payments, related acquisition costs for mineral properties acquired under an option agreement, general overhead, administrative and holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. When reserves are determined for a property and a bankable feasibility study is completed, subsequent exploration and development costs on the property would be capitalized. If a project were to be put into production, capitalized costs would be depleted on the unit of production basis.

~~Mineral~~Management ~~property~~reviews ~~acquisition~~the ~~costs~~net ~~are~~carrying ~~recorded~~value atof ~~cost~~each mineral property and ~~are~~milling ~~deferred~~assets ~~until~~as ~~the~~changes ~~viability~~may ofmaterialize ~~the~~with ~~property~~an isasset or ~~determined.~~at ~~Exploration~~a minimum, ~~mineral~~on ~~property~~a ~~evaluation~~quarterly basis. Where information and conditions suggest impairment under ASC 360-10-35-17, ~~option~~estimated ~~payments~~future net cash flows from each asset are calculated using estimated future prices, ~~related~~proven ~~acquisition~~and ~~costs~~probable ~~for~~reserves ~~mineral~~and ~~properties~~value ~~acquired~~beyond ~~under~~proven anand ~~option~~probable ~~agreement~~reserves, ~~general~~and ~~overhead~~operating, ~~administrative~~capital and ~~holding~~reclamation costs toon ~~maintain~~an aundiscounted ~~property~~basis. onIf ait ~~care~~is ~~and~~determined ~~maintenance~~that ~~basis~~the future cash flows are ~~expensed~~less inthan the ~~period~~carrying ~~they~~value, ~~are~~a ~~incurred.~~write-down ~~When~~to ~~reserves~~the ~~are~~estimated ~~determined~~fair ~~for~~value ais ~~property~~made ~~and~~with a ~~bankable~~charge ~~feasibility~~to ~~study~~loss isfor ~~completed,~~the ~~subsequent~~period. ~~exploration~~Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and ~~development~~where ~~costs~~other onconditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the ~~property~~carrying ~~would~~value can be ~~capitalized~~recovered. IfFurthermore, aif ~~project~~the ~~were~~Company todetermines bethat ~~put~~an ~~into~~impairment ~~production~~analysis should be done, ~~capitalized~~the ~~costs~~analysis ~~would~~will be ~~depleted~~performed onusing ~~the~~rules ~~unit~~of ASC 930-360-35, Asset Impairment, and 360-10-15-3 through 15-5, Impairment or Disposal of ~~production~~Long-Lived ~~basis~~Assets.

Management reviews the net carrying value of each mineral property as changes may materialize with a property or at a minimum, on an annual basis. Where information and conditions suggest impairment, estimated future net cash flows from each property are calculated using estimated future prices, proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, and operating, capital and reclamation costs on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future cash flows are less than the carrying value, a write-~~down~~ to7 the estimated fair value is made with a charge to loss for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered.-

Management's estimates of gold prices, recoverable reserves, probable outcomes, operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risks and uncertainties that may affect the recoverability of mineral property costs.

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~Notes~~NOTES toTO ~~Financial~~CONDENSED ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

2. (b) Emerging ~~Stock-Based~~Growth ~~Compensation~~Company

~~The~~We ~~Company~~are ~~recognizes~~an ~~stock-based~~“emerging ~~compensation~~growth ~~expense~~company,” inas ~~its~~defined ~~statement~~in ofthe ~~operations~~Jumpstart ~~based~~our onBusiness ~~estimates~~Startups Act of ~~the~~2012, ~~fair~~and ~~value~~we ofmay ~~employee~~take ~~stock~~advantage ~~option~~of ~~and~~certain ~~stock~~exemptions ~~grant~~from ~~awards~~various asreporting ~~measured~~requirements onthat ~~the~~are ~~grant~~applicable ~~date.~~to ~~For~~other ~~stock~~public ~~options~~companies, ~~the~~including, ~~Company~~but ~~uses~~not ~~the~~limited ~~Black-Scholes~~to, ~~option~~not ~~pricing~~being ~~model~~required to ~~determine~~comply with the ~~value~~auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the ~~awards~~Sarbanes-Oxley ~~granted.~~Act, ~~The~~reduced ~~Company~~disclosure ~~amortizes~~obligations ~~the~~regarding ~~estimated~~executive ~~value~~compensation ofin ~~the~~our ~~options~~periodic asreports ofand ~~the~~proxy ~~grant~~statements, ~~date~~and ~~over~~exemptions from the ~~stock~~requirements ~~options’~~of ~~vesting~~holding ~~period,~~a ~~which~~nonbinding isadvisory ~~generally~~vote ~~four~~on ~~years.~~executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden

~~During~~parachute ~~the~~payments nine months ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement under which it agreed to grant options to purchase 1,750,000 shares of common stock to its officer. Pursuant to the terms of each of the employment agreements, the options will vest over approximately four years from the date of the officer’s commenced employment and will have an exercise price of $0.0001 per share. The Company granted options to these officers at the $0.0001 per share exercise price, in part, because the employment agreements do not ~~provide~~previously ~~for the officers to receive any cash compensation until the Company secures at least $2 million in financing~~approved.

~~The~~Under ~~Company has estimated~~ the ~~value~~Jumpstart ofOur ~~common~~Business ~~stock~~Startups ~~into~~Act, ~~which~~“emerging ~~the~~growth ~~options~~companies” ~~are~~can ~~exercisable~~delay atadopting ~~$.0001~~new ~~per~~or ~~share~~revised ~~for~~accounting ~~financial~~standards ~~reporting~~until ~~purposes~~such attime ~~par~~as ~~value.~~those ~~Greentech~~standards ~~Mining~~apply ~~International~~to ~~common stock has never traded publicly, and no stock has traded in~~ private ~~markets~~companies. ~~either,~~We ~~except~~have ~~for~~elected ~~privately~~not ~~negotiated sales~~ to ~~the~~avail ~~founders~~ourselves ofto ~~the~~this ~~company~~exemption ~~and~~from ~~the~~new ~~stock-based~~or ~~compensation~~revised ~~was~~accounting standards ~~granted when the Company had no assets~~ and, ~~was~~therefore, awe ~~shell~~will ~~company.~~be Nosubject ~~common~~to ~~stock~~the ~~has~~same ~~been~~new ~~sold~~or inrevised ~~any~~accounting ~~transactions~~standards ~~since~~as ~~the~~other ~~Company~~public ~~emerged~~companies ~~from~~that ~~its~~are ~~shell-company status. The Company does~~ not ~~have~~“emerging ~~any~~growth ~~offers for purchase of its common stock in any stage, and no stock is registered for resale with the Securities and Exchange Commission~~companies.”

~~The~~ NOTE ~~Company~~2 believes the only material estimate used in estimating the value stock options was the estimated fair value of the common stock, and that assumed volatility, term, interest rate and dividend yield changes would be not result in material differences in stock option valuations. Based on the assumed value of common stock, the grant-~~date~~ ~~fair~~GOING ~~value of options granted during the nine months ended December 31, 2012 was $0.~~CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company ~~has~~will ~~reserved~~realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements the Company has a ~~total~~deficit accumulated during the development stage of 7$109,~~500~~349,~~000~~ ~~shares~~due to shareholder of ~~common~~$103,923 ~~stock~~and ~~for~~had ~~issuance~~$49 ~~under~~cash ~~its~~as ~~stock~~of ~~award~~June ~~plan~~30, ~~and~~2013. ~~issued~~The ~~1,750,000~~Company’s ability to continue as ofa ~~December~~going 31concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing necessary for it to meet its obligations, ~~2012~~develop the products that it has licensed, and ~~per~~ultimately ~~our~~generate revenues from the sale of these products. The Company’s ~~Stock~~founder ~~Plan~~has ~~the~~agreed ~~plan~~to ~~re-triggers~~fund tocertain ~~25%~~administrative operating expenses of the ~~total~~Company ~~outstanding~~until ~~shares~~the onCompany ~~January~~succeeds 1,in ~~2013~~raising additional funds. Management’s plans include raising additional funds through an equity financing or licensing transaction in order to meet the Company’s obligations and develop its product candidates, ~~therefore~~but asfunding may not be available and the Company may be unsuccessful in raising additional capital of ~~December~~any ~~31,~~type. ~~2012~~These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ~~has~~ability to continue as a ~~reserve~~going ofconcern. ~~5,750,000~~The ~~shares~~accompanying offinancial ~~common~~statements ~~stock~~do ~~for~~not ~~issuance~~include ~~under~~any ~~its~~adjustments ~~stock~~that ~~award~~might ~~plan~~arise as a result of this uncertainty.

~~Going~~NOTE ~~Concern~~- 3 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $108,620, due to shareholder of $104,798 and cash of $778 as of December 31, 2012. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing necessary for it to meet its obligations, explore and produce precious metals, and ultimately generate revenues from the sale of these products. The Company’s founder has agreed to fund certain administrative operating expenses of the Company until the Company succeeds in raising additional funds. Management’s plans include raising additional funds through an equity financing or licensing transaction in order to meet the Company’s obligations and develop its product candidates, but funding may not be available and the Company may be unsuccessful in raising additional capital of any type. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

3. Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies followed are:

BASIS OF PRESENTATION - The accompanying unaudited financial statements primarily reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Company (as discussed above). The accompanying unauditedconsolidated financial statements of Company have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, these interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2013, or for any other period. Amounts related to disclosures of March 31, 2012, balances within those interim financial statements were derived from the audited 2011 financial statements and notes thereto filed on Form 10-K on June 26, 2012.

USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - All cash, other than held in escrow, is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The company does not have cash equivalents as of June 30, 2013 and 2012.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES - Expenditures for research, development, and engineering of products are expensed as incurred.

COMMON STOCK - The Company records common stock issuances when all of the legal requirements for the issuance of such common stock have been satisfied.

REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION - The Company has no current source of revenue; therefore the Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding the ~~recognition of revenue or cost.~~

recognition of revenue or cost.

ADVERTISING COSTS - The Company's policy regarding advertising is to expense advertising when incurred.

INCOME TAXES - Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences. Such temporary differences result from differences in the carrying value of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

~~The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740~~-10 ~~"Uncertainty~~8 ~~in Income Taxes" (ASC 740~~-10), on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

LOSS PER SHARE - Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. At September 30, 2012, the Company did not have any potentially dilutive common shares.

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~Notes~~NOTES toTO ~~Financial~~CONDENSED ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

3.The ~~Significant~~Company ~~Accounting~~adopted ~~Policies~~the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10 "Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (~~continued~~ASC 740-10), on January 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

LOSS PER SHARE - Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. At December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any potentially dilutive common shares.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

· Level 1 - ~~Observable~~Unadjusted ~~inputs such as~~ quoted prices in active markets; that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

· Level 2 - Inputs, other than quoted prices inincluded ~~active~~within ~~markets,~~Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

· Level 3 - ~~Unobservable~~Inputs ~~inputs~~that inare ~~which~~both ~~there~~significant isto ~~little or no market data, which require~~ the ~~reporting~~fair ~~entity~~value tomeasurement ~~develop~~and ~~its own assumptions~~unobservable.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company's notes payable is estimated based on current rates that would be available for debt of similar terms which is not significantly different from its stated value.

On January 1, 2011, the Company applied ASC 820 for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~Except~~In ~~for~~February ~~rules~~2013, ~~and~~the ~~interpretive~~FASB ~~releases~~issued ofASU ~~the~~No. ~~SEC~~2013-02, ~~under~~Reporting ~~authority~~of Amounts Reclassified Out of ~~federal~~Accumulated ~~securities~~Other ~~laws~~Comprehensive ~~and~~(ASU a2013-02). ~~limited~~This ~~number~~guidance ofis ~~grandfathered~~the ~~standards,~~culmination of the FASB’s ~~Accounting~~deliberation ~~Standards~~on ~~Codification™~~reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (~~“ASC”~~AOCI). isThe amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the ~~sole~~current ~~source~~requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of ~~authoritative~~amounts ~~GAAP~~reclassified ~~literature~~out ~~recognized~~of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the ~~FASB~~face ~~and~~of ~~applicable~~the tostatement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of ASU 2013-02 will have on its financial statements. ~~Management~~ Other ~~has~~recent ~~reviewed~~accounting pronouncements issued by the ~~aforementioned~~FASB ~~rules~~(including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and ~~releases~~the United States Securities and ~~believes~~Exchange ~~any~~Commission ~~effect~~did ~~will~~not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company'’s present or future financial statements.

NOTE 4. ~~Equity~~- ~~Transactions~~STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense in its statement of operations based on estimates of the fair value of employee stock option and stock grant awards as measured on the grant date. For stock options, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the value of the awards granted. The Company amortizes the estimated value of the options as of the grant date over the stock options’ vesting period, which is generally four years.

- 9 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

During the three months ended June 30, 2013 the Company issues Accelerated Venture Partner, LLC. 1,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share and the Company relinquished its rights to repurchase 1,000,000 share of common stock that was issued to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC on June 28, 2012 and issues Matthew Neher 8,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share for additional services rendered to the Company from June 2012 to June 2013.

During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement under which it agreed to grant options to purchase 1,750,000 shares of common stock to its officer. Pursuant to the terms of each of the employment agreements, the options will vest over approximately four years from the date of the officer’s commenced employment and will have an exercise price of $0.0001 per share. The Company granted options to these officers at the $0.0001 per share exercise price, in part, because the employment agreements do not provide for the officers to receive any cash compensation until the Company secures at least $2 million in financing.

The Company has estimated the value of common stock into which the options are exercisable at $.0001 per share for financial reporting purposes at par value. Greentech Mining International common stock has never traded publicly, and no stock has traded in private markets either, except for privately negotiated sales to the founders of the company and the stock-based compensation was granted when the Company had no assets and was a shell company. No common stock has been sold in any transactions since the Company emerged from its shell-company status. The Company does not have any offers for purchase of its common stock in any stage, and no stock is registered for resale with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company believes the only material estimate used in estimating the value stock options was the estimated fair value of the common stock, and that assumed volatility, term, interest rate and dividend yield changes would be not result in material differences in stock option valuations. Based on the assumed value of common stock, the grant-date fair value of options granted from February 6, 2012 (inception) through June 30, 2013 was $0.

The Company has reserved a total of 7,500,000 shares of common stock for issuance under its stock award plan, and issued 1,750,000 as of June 30, 2013 and per our Company’s Stock Plan the plan re-triggers to 25% of the total outstanding shares on January 1, 2013, therefore as of June 30, 2013he Company has a reserve of 7,750,000 shares of common stock for issuance under its stock award plan.

NOTE 5 - STOCK AND STOCK TRANSACTIONS

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share. The Company’s Board of Directors has the ability to determine the rights and preferences of any series of preferred stock issued. There are no shares of preferred stock currently issued or outstanding.

Common Stock

The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

At inception (February 6, 2010), the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC (“AVP”) for $2,000.

On June 26, 2012, the Company issued 26,500,000, shares of common stock to Novus Aurum Trust at par value.

On June 26, 2012, AVP tendered 1,500,000 shares to the Company for cancellation.

On June 27, 2012, the Company granted AVP an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at par value in exchange for certain consulting services, and AVP immediately exercised this option. The Company has the option to repurchase the shares exercised under the option at par value if the below milestones are not met within a specified time:.

9On June 3, 2013, the Company issues Accelerated Venture Partner, LLC. 1,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share and the Company relinquished its rights to repurchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock that were issued to Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC on June 28, 2012 due to additional services rendered to the Company from June 2012 to June 2013.

On June 3, 2013, The Company issues Matthew Neher 8,500,000 shares of common stock at par value of .0001 per share for additional services rendered to the Company from June 2012 to June 2013.

As of June 30, 2013, there were 41,000,000 shares issued and outstanding and 7,500,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Company’s Stock Option Plan and 5,500,000 of these shares remained available for future issuance as of June 30, 2013 There were 59,000,000 shares of common stock available for future issuance.

- 10 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~Notes~~NOTES toTO ~~Financial~~CONDENSED ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

4.NOTE ~~Equity~~6 ~~Transactions~~- ~~(continued)~~ INCOME TAXES

·	Milestone 1 – Company’s right of repurchase will lapse with respect to 60% of the shares upon securing $10 million in available cash from funding;
·	Milestone 2 – Company’s right of repurchase will lapse with respect to 40% of the Shares upon securing $15 million in available cash (inclusive of any amounts attributable to Milestone 1).

The Company has incurred net operating losses since inception. The Company has not reflected any benefit of such net operating loss carry forward in the financial statements.

AsIn ofassessing ~~December~~the ~~31,~~realization ~~2012,~~of ~~there~~deferred ~~were~~tax 31assets,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~management ~~issued~~considers ~~and~~whether ~~outstanding~~it ~~and~~is ~~7,500,000~~more ~~shares~~likely ofthan ~~common~~not ~~stock~~that ~~were~~some ~~reserved~~portion ~~for~~or ~~issuance~~all ~~under~~of the ~~Company’s~~deferred ~~Stock~~tax ~~Option~~assets ~~Plan~~will ~~and~~not ~~5,500,000~~be ofrealized. ~~these~~The ~~shares~~ultimate ~~remained~~realization ~~available for future issuance as~~ of ~~December~~deferred ~~31,~~tax ~~2012.~~assets ~~There~~is ~~were~~dependent ~~69,000,000~~upon ~~shares~~the generation of ~~common stock available for~~ future ~~issuance~~taxable income.

5Based on the level of historical taxable losses and projections of future taxable income (losses) over the periods in which the deferred tax assets can be realized, management currently believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of these deductible differences. ~~Income~~Accordingly, ~~Taxes~~the Company has provided a valuation allowance against the gross deferred tax assets as follows:

The Company has not recognized an income tax benefit for its operating losses generated based on uncertainties concerning its ability to generate taxable income in future periods. The tax benefit for the periods presented is offset by a valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets arising from the net operating losses and other temporary differences, the realization of which could not be considered more likely than not. In future periods, tax benefits and related deferred tax assets will be recognized when management considers realization of such amounts to be more likely than not. As of December 31, 2012 the Company had a loss and for the period February 6, 2012 (date of inception) through December 31, 2012. The net operating losses resulting from operating activities result in deferred tax assets of approximately $108,620 at the effective statutory rates which will expire by the year 2031. The deferred tax asset has been off-set by an equal valuation allowance.

	June 30, 2013
Gross deferred tax assets	$	109,349
Valuation allowance		(109,349)
Net deferred tax asset		—

~~There~~As ~~are~~of noJune ~~current~~30, or2013, ~~deferred~~the ~~income~~Company ~~tax~~had ~~expense~~a ornet ~~benefit~~operating ~~recognized~~loss ~~for~~carry ~~the~~forward ~~period~~of ~~ended~~approximately ~~December 31~~$109,349, ~~2012~~which will begin to in the tax year 2028.

6Federal tax laws impose significant restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards and research and development credits in the event of a change in ownership of the Company, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code Section 382. ~~Option~~The ~~Agreements~~Company’s net operating loss carry forwards and research and development credits may be subject to the above limitations.

OnThe ~~September~~relevant ~~17,~~FASB ~~2012,~~standard weresulted ~~entered~~in ~~into~~no anadjustments ~~Operating,~~to ~~Exploration~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~Option~~liability tofor ~~Purchase~~unrecognized ~~Agreement~~tax ~~(Option~~benefits. ~~Agreement),~~As ~~pursuant~~of tothe ~~which~~date ~~the~~of ~~Company~~adoption ~~received~~and ~~exclusive~~as ~~rights~~of ~~that~~June ~~consists~~30, of2013here ~~all~~were ~~671~~no ~~acres~~unrecognizable oftax ~~Section~~benefits. 36Accordingly, ~~Township~~a 29tabular ~~South,~~reconciliation ~~Range~~from 11beginning ~~East,~~to ~~Salt~~ending ~~Lake~~periods ~~Base~~is ~~and~~not ~~Meridian,~~provided. inThe ~~Wayne~~Company ~~County,~~will ~~Utah~~classify ~~upon~~any ~~which~~future aninterest ~~operating~~and ~~gravimetric~~penalties ~~circuit~~as ~~(system~~a tocomponent ~~separate minerals~~of byincome ~~weight)~~tax ~~has~~expense if incurred. To date, there have been ~~built~~no oninterest ~~the~~or ~~private~~penalties ~~property~~charged or accrued in relation to unrecognized tax benefits. The InCompany ~~addition,~~is ~~the~~subject ~~agreement~~to ~~includes~~federal ~~four~~and ~~Bureau~~state ofexaminations ~~Land~~for ~~Management~~the ~~(“BLM”)~~year ~~mining~~2008 ~~claim~~forward. ~~groups~~There ~~totaling~~are ~~3,940~~no ~~acres~~tax ~~to:~~examinations currently in progress.

NOTE 7 - OPTION AGREEMENTS

On September 17, 2012, we entered into an Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement (Option Agreement) with Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”), both entities are under common control, pursuant to which the Company received exclusive rights that consists of all 671 acres of Section 36, Township 29 South, Range 11 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, in Wayne County, Utah upon which an operating gravimetric circuit (system to separate minerals by weight) has been built on the private property. In addition, the agreement includes four Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) mining claim groups totaling 3,940 acres to:

Processing, concentrating, beneficiating, treating, milling, smelting, shipping, selling and otherwise disposing of the Contracted Substances and receiving the proceeds of any such sale;

d. Engaging in any other activity that Contractor deems reasonable and necessary to achieve the foregoing purposes.

The term of the Option Agreement is for three (3) years from the effective date set forth above, and may be renewed by the Company for successive three (3) year periods upon substantially the same terms and provisions as set forth herein based upon the then-~~capital~~ ~~structure~~11 of the Company, until declared forfeited and canceled by Owner or relinquished by the Company, as described in Note 8. The Company shall give Owner written notice of each renewal at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the respective three-year term. The Option Agreement shall automatically renew and continue so long as ores, minerals, or metals are produced or sold from the Henry Mountain Project on a continuous basis. The Company shall have the continuing right to terminate the Option Agreement at any time and to surrender the Henry Mountain Project to Owner by giving Owner written notice thereof at least 30 days prior to the stated date of termination. Termination of the Option Agreement shall not relieve the Company of its obligation to pay all royalties due to Owner as well as its pro-rata share of taxes and fees. The Company has received a verbal agreement from the Owner to extend the payment dates in the agreement from December 1, 2012 to May 1, 2013.

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~Notes~~NOTES toTO ~~Financial~~CONDENSED ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

6.The term of the Option ~~Agreements~~Agreement is for three (~~continued~~3) years from the effective date set forth above, and may be renewed by the Company for successive three (3) year periods upon substantially the same terms and provisions as set forth herein based upon the then-capital structure of the Company, until declared forfeited and canceled by Owner or relinquished by the Company, as described in Note 8. The Company shall give Owner written notice of each renewal at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the respective three-year term. The Option Agreement shall automatically renew and continue so long as ores, minerals, or metals are produced or sold from the Henry Mountain Project on a continuous basis. The Company shall have the continuing right to terminate the Option Agreement at any time and to surrender the Henry Mountain Project to Owner by giving Owner written notice thereof at least 30 days prior to the stated date of termination. Termination of the Option Agreement shall not relieve the Company of its obligation to pay all royalties due to Owner as well as its pro-rata share of taxes and fees. The Company has received a verbal agreement from the Owner to extend the payment dates in the agreement from December 1, 2012 to August 1, 2013.

On September 22, 2012, the Company entered into a Mineral Claim Option Agreement (MCOA). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has an option to purchase a 100% interest in certain mining claims located in the state of Arizona over twelve months, as described in Note 8. The Company was granted the exclusive and irrevocable right during the agreement and the first right of refusal on any offer received by Optionor during the first sixty days of the agreement on the property The right of first refusal or first option to purchase may only be exercised by the Company within fourteen days (14) days from notification by Optionor that Optionor’s desires to sell the subject property and Optionor is obligated to provide such notice to the company prior to offering the subject property to a third party. The Company has not exercised the option and is still evaluating the property and material.

The Company, at its sole discretion, may abandon all interests and cease mineral exploration and extraction work on the Property at any time by providing at least 30 days written notice, the “Termination Notice”, to the Optionor. The Company shall have not further obligations to the Optionor in regards to option payments, exploration and extraction work payments as of the effective date of the “Termination Notice”

7On May 10, 2013, Greentech Mining International, Inc. ~~Related~~enter ~~Party~~into ~~Transactions~~an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to amend payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 that was previously extended to May 1, 2013 has now been extended to October 1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to June 1, 2013 has now been extended to November 1, 2013.

~~The~~On ~~President~~May ~~and~~10, ~~majority~~2013, ~~stockholder of~~ Greentech Mining International, Inc. ~~and~~enter ~~Greentech~~into ~~Mining~~a ~~Utah~~verbal ~~LLC~~agreement iswith ~~Matthew~~Union ~~Neher,~~Gulf aResources ~~director~~Ltd. ~~and~~to ~~CEO~~amend payment terms of the ~~Company~~Mineral ~~since~~Claim ~~June~~Option 26Agreement ~~2012.~~entered ~~Mr.~~into ~~Neher~~on ~~was~~September ~~the~~22, ~~principal~~2012. ~~developer~~Pursuant ofto the ~~processing~~agreement ~~plant and acquired~~ the ~~mining~~parties ~~claims~~agreed ~~optioned~~that the byconsideration ~~the~~of ~~Company~~three onmillion ~~September~~five ~~17,~~hundred ~~2012.~~dollars ~~Matthew~~($3,500,000) ~~also~~with ~~controls~~the ~~Novus~~first ~~Aurum~~payment ~~Trust~~of ~~the~~seven ~~majority~~hundred ~~shareholder~~fifty ofthousand ~~the~~dollars ~~Company.~~($750,000) ~~From~~being ~~inception~~made ~~through~~on December 311, 2012, ~~the~~that ~~Company~~was ~~paid~~previously $0extended ~~cash~~ to ~~Matthew~~April ~~Neher and accrued $24~~31,~~700~~ ~~for~~2013 ~~expenses~~has ~~due~~been extended to ~~Matthew~~August ~~Neher~~1, 2013 and ~~Novus~~the ~~Aurum~~remaining ~~Trust.~~seven ~~See~~payments ~~Note~~of 4$350,000 ~~for~~every athree ~~description~~months ofstarting ~~the~~March ~~stock~~1, ~~transaction~~2013 ~~involving~~previously ~~Novus~~extended ~~Aurum~~to ~~Trust.~~start ~~See~~August ~~Note~~1, 62013 ~~for~~has abeen ~~description~~extended ofto ~~the~~November ~~Option~~1, ~~Agreement~~2013 ~~with~~and ~~Greentech~~a ~~Mining~~final ~~Inc~~payment ~~Greentech~~of ~~Mining~~$300,000 ~~Utah~~that ~~LLC.~~was ~~Also~~due ~~see~~December ~~Note~~1, 82014 ~~for~~previously aextended ~~description of commitments~~ to ~~Greentech~~April ~~Mining~~30, ~~Inc.~~2015 ~~and~~has ~~Greentech~~been ~~Mining~~extended ~~Utah~~to ~~LLC~~August ~~under~~1, ~~the Option Agreement~~2015.

~~The~~NOTE Managing Partner of AVP is Timothy Neher, a director of the Company and the only officer of the Company prior to June 26, 2012. From inception through December 31, 2012, the Company paid $302 cash to AVP and accrued $80,098 for expenses due to AVP. See Note 4 for a description of the stock transactions involving AVP. See Note 8 ~~for~~- aRELATED ~~description~~PARTY ~~of commitments to AVP.~~TRANSACTIONS

~~For~~The ~~the~~President ~~nine~~and ~~months~~majority ~~ended~~stockholder ~~December~~of 31Greentech Mining Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah LLC is Matthew Neher, a director and CEO of the Company since June 26 2012,. weMr. ~~had~~Neher nowas ~~revenue~~the ~~and~~principal ~~incurred~~developer ~~general~~of the processing plant and ~~administrative~~acquired ~~expenses~~the ofmining ~~$106~~claims optioned the by the Company on September 17,~~820~~ 2012. ~~Our~~Matthew ~~net~~also ~~loss~~controls ~~was~~Novus ~~$106,820,~~Aurum ~~due~~Trust tothe ~~general~~majority ~~and~~shareholder ~~administrative~~of ~~expenses~~the Company. ~~General~~From ~~and~~inception ~~administrative~~through ~~expenses~~December ~~for~~31, 2012, the ~~first~~Company ~~nine~~paid ~~months~~$0 ofcash ~~fiscal~~to ~~2012~~Matthew ~~consisted~~Neher ofand accrued $24,700 for ~~the~~expenses ~~mining~~due ~~equipment~~to Matthew Neher and ~~$82,120~~Novus ~~for~~Aurum ~~administrative~~Trust. ~~support,~~See ~~which~~Note ~~mostly~~4 ~~consisted~~for a description of ~~document~~the ~~preparation~~stock ~~for~~transaction ~~formation~~involving Novus Aurum Trust and ~~EDGAR~~Matthew ~~filings~~Neher. ~~with~~See Note 6 for a description of the ~~SEC.~~Option ~~The~~Agreement ~~$24,700~~with ~~mining~~Greentech ~~equipment~~Mining isInc ~~paid~~Greentech byMining ~~Matthew~~Utah ~~Neher,~~LLC. ~~the~~Also ~~CEO~~see Note 8 for a description of commitments to Greentech Mining Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah LLC under the ~~Company~~Option Agreement.

8The Managing Partner of AVP is Timothy Neher, a director of the Company and the only officer of the Company prior to June 26, 2012. ~~Commitments~~From February 6, 2012 (inception) through June 30, 2013, the Company paid $302 cash to AVP and ~~Contingencies~~accrued $80,098 for expenses due to AVP. See Note 4 for a description of the stock transactions involving AVP. See Note 8 for a description of commitments to AVP.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 we had no revenue and incurred general and administrative expenses of $4. Our net loss was $109,349, due to general and administrative expenses. From February 6, 2012 (inception through June 30, 2013, general and administrative expenses consisted of $24,700 for the mining equipment and $79,223for administrative support, which mostly consisted of document preparation for formation and EDGAR filings with the SEC. Matthew Neher, the CEO of the Company, paid the $24,700 for mining equipment..

- 12 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

Other.

Matthew Neher is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Greentech Mining, Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah since 2010 and 2011, respectively. Although Mr. Neher does not have employment agreements with these companies, he has received approximately $150,000 in loans (with no formal written agreement) and expense reimbursements over the last 24 months. Mr. Neher will receive compensation of an estimated combine total of $10,000 per months from Greentech Mining, Inc. and Greentech Mining Utah until a new CEO is indemnified and hired by these companies.The officers and directors for the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interest. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On June 28, 2012, the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with AVP. The agreement requires AVP to provide the Company with certain advisory services that include reviewing the Company’s business plan, identifying and introducing prospective financial and business partners, and providing general business advice regarding the Company’s operations and business strategy. Cash compensation of $600,000 is due upon the Company securing $10 million in available cash from funding, and an additional $300,000 is due upon the Company securing $10 million in available cash from funding (inclusive of the first $5 million). The cash compensation is to be paid to AVP at the rate of $37,500 per month. The total cash compensation to be received by AVP is not to exceed $900,000 unless the Company receives an amount of funding in excess of $15 million. If the Company receives equity or debt financing that is an amount less than $10 million, in between $10 million and $15 million, or greater than $15 million, the cash compensation earned by the AVP under its consulting services agreement will be prorated. The Company has the option to make a lump sum payment to AVP in lieu of the monthly cash payments. The Company will allow the Consultant to invest up to an additional $5 million in any future debt or equity offering of the Company on the same terms and conditions offered to other participants in such offerings. The Consultant will not be obligated to participate in any such offerings. Accelerated Venture Partners has executed ten consulting agreements with public shell companies it formally controlled. Of the ten consulting services agreements, one was terminated by Accelerated Venture Partners, one is expired and the company has not elected to terminate the agreement and repurchase the consulting share. Furthermore, the remaining eight companies have either renewed consulting agreements with Accelerated Venture Partners or are under the original consulting agreement.

11On September 17, 2012, Greentech Mining International, Inc. entered into an Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement (“Option Agreement”) with Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”), both entities are under common control. Under the terms of the Option Agreement the Company shall make payment to Owner for the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars being made on or before November 1, 2012 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 (note that all payments due have been verbally extended until May 1, 2013). In addition to the consideration set forth herein, Contractor shall pay Owner a Five Percent (5%) Net Smelter Royalty on all mineral bearing ores once Commercial Production has commenced. “Commercial Production” means the commercial-scale operation of any part of the Henry Mountain Project as a Mine by, or on behalf of, the Company. The Company shall perform exploration, mining, development, production, processing or any other activity (“Work” herein) which benefits the Henry Mountain Project at a minimum cost of $3,000,000 for the first year, $3,000,000 for the second year, and $3,000,000 for the third year of the Option

Agreement. Additionally, the Owners granted to Company the sole and exclusive option to purchase all of the Owner’s rights, title and interest in the Henry Mountain Project for a total purchase price of two million dollars ($2,000,000), plus a perpetual two percent (2%) Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”). The Company has entered into a verbal agreement with the Owner to extend the payment terms that were to begin on December 1, 2012 to beginning on May 1, 2013 and the monthly payments will begin on June 1, 2013. On March 21, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to revise payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 be extended to May1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 be extended to June 1, 2013.

The Company did not recognize any assets or liabilities related to the Option Agreement signed on September 17, 2012. The Owner did not pass the ownership of the related assets until the first payment of one million dollar has been paid in the future and this has not occurred. Also, the carrying value of the Option Agreement is not an arm’s length transaction due to the fact both the Company and Owners are commonly controlled by Mr. Matthew Neher. Therefore, the carrying value of the Option Agreement cannot be determined until actual consideration has been paid.

- 13 -

GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

~~Notes~~NOTES toTO ~~Financial~~CONDENSED ~~Statements~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

8.On ~~Commitments~~September ~~and~~22, ~~Contingencies~~2012, the registrant entered into a Mineral Claim Option Agreement with Union Gulf Resources Ltd. (~~continued~~“Optionor”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Optionor gave an option to purchase a 100% interest in certain mining claims located in the state of Arizona. In consideration of the option to purchase, Greentech Mining International, Inc. agreed to, provided that the Company has not abandoned the property, the Company will pay to the Optionor $3,500,000 US Dollars with the first payment of $750,000 on December 1, 2012, seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting March 1, 2013 and a final

Onpayment ~~September~~of 17$300,000 ~~2012,~~on ~~Greentech~~December ~~Mining International~~1, ~~Inc~~2014. ~~entered~~The ~~into~~Company anhas ~~Operating,~~entered ~~Exploration~~into ~~and~~a ~~Option~~verbal toagreement ~~Purchase Agreement (“Option Agreement”)~~ with ~~Greentech Mining, Inc. a Delaware Corporation and Greentech Mining Utah, LLC a Utah limited liability company, (“Owners”). Under~~ the ~~terms~~Optionor ~~of the Option Agreement the Company shall make payment~~ to ~~Owner~~extend ~~for~~ the ~~initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first~~ payment ofterms ~~one~~that ~~million~~were ~~dollars~~to ~~being~~begin ~~made~~ on orDecember ~~before November~~ 1, 2012 ~~and~~to ~~the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000~~ beginning on ~~December 1, 2012 (note that all payments due have been verbally extended until~~ May 1, 2013~~). In addition to the consideration set forth herein~~, ~~Contractor~~seven ~~shall~~payments ~~pay Owner a Five Percent (5%) Net Smelter Royalty on all mineral bearing ores once Commercial Production has commenced. “Commercial Production” means the commercial-scale operation~~ of any part of the Henry Mountain Project as a Mine by, or on behalf of, the Company. The Company shall perform exploration, mining, development, production, processing or any other activity (“Work” herein) which benefits the Henry Mountain Project at a minimum cost of $3350,000~~,000~~ ~~for~~every ~~the~~three ~~first~~months ~~year,~~starting ~~$3,000,000~~August ~~for the second year~~1, ~~and~~2013 ~~$3,000,000 for the third year of the Option Agreement. Additionally, the Owners granted to Company the sole~~ and ~~exclusive option to purchase all of the Owner’s rights, title and interest in the Henry Mountain Project for~~ a ~~total~~final ~~purchase~~payment ~~price~~ of ~~two million dollars (~~$2300,000~~,000),~~ ~~plus a perpetual two percent (2%) Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”). The Company has entered into a verbal agreement with the Owner to extend the payment terms that were to begin~~ on ~~December 1, 2012 to beginning on~~ May 1, ~~2013 and the monthly payments will begin on June 1, 2013~~2015.

OnOptionor ~~September~~granted ~~22,~~the ~~2012,~~Company the ~~registrant~~exclusive ~~entered~~and ~~into~~irrevocable aright ~~Mineral~~during ~~Claim~~the ~~Option~~agreement ~~Agreement~~and ~~with~~the ~~Union~~first ~~Gulf~~right ~~Resources~~of ~~Ltd.~~refusal ~~(“Optionor”).~~on ~~Pursuant~~any tooffer ~~the~~received ~~agreement,~~by ~~the~~ Optionor ~~gave~~during anthe ~~option~~first tosixty ~~purchase~~days aof ~~100%~~the ~~interest~~agreement inon ~~certain~~the ~~mining~~property ~~claims~~situated ~~located~~ in ~~the~~Mohave ~~state~~County, of Arizona. InThe ~~consideration~~right of ~~the~~first refusal or first option to purchase, ~~Greentech~~may ~~Mining~~only ~~International,~~be ~~Inc.~~exercised ~~agreed~~by ~~to, provided that~~ the Company ~~has~~within ~~not~~fourteen ~~abandoned~~days ~~the~~(14) ~~property,~~days ~~the~~from ~~Company~~notification ~~will~~by ~~pay~~Optionor tothat ~~the~~ Optionor’s ~~$3,500,000~~desires USto ~~Dollars~~sell ~~with~~ the ~~first~~subject ~~payment~~property. ofOptionor ~~$750,000~~is onobligated ~~December~~to 1,provide ~~2012,~~such ~~seven~~notice ~~payments~~to ofCompany ~~$350,000~~prior ~~every~~to ~~three~~offering ~~months~~the ~~starting~~subject ~~March~~property 1,to ~~2013 and~~ a ~~final~~third ~~payment of $300,000 on December 1, 2014~~party.

~~Optionor~~As ~~granted~~permitted ~~the~~under ~~Company~~Delaware ~~the~~law ~~exclusive~~ and ~~irrevocable~~in ~~right~~accordance ~~during~~with ~~the~~its ~~agreement~~Bylaws, ~~and~~Greentech ~~the~~Mining ~~first~~International ~~right~~indemnifies ofits ~~refusal~~officers onand ~~any~~directors ~~offer~~for ~~received~~certain byexpenses ~~Optionor~~incurred ~~during~~from ~~the~~legal ~~first~~or ~~sixty~~other ~~days~~proceedings ofthat ~~the~~arise ~~agreement~~as ona ~~the~~result ~~property situated in Mohave County, Arizona. The right~~ of ~~first~~the ~~refusal~~director or ~~first option to purchase may only be exercised by the Company within fourteen days (14) days from notification by Optionor that Optionor~~officer’s ~~desires~~service to ~~sell~~ the ~~subject property~~Company. ~~Optionor~~There is ~~obligated~~no tolimitation ~~provide~~on ~~such~~the ~~notice~~term toof ~~Company~~the ~~prior~~indemnification toand ~~offering~~ the ~~subject~~maximum ~~property~~amount toof apotential ~~third~~future ~~party~~indemnification is unlimited. The Company ~~shall~~currently bedoes ~~responsible~~not ~~for~~have ~~any~~a directors and ~~all~~officers ~~property~~insurance ~~payments~~policy ~~due~~that tocould ~~any~~limit ~~governmental~~its ~~authority~~exposure ~~on the Property during the terms of this Option Agreement~~ and ~~will~~enable ~~also~~it beto ~~responsible~~recover ~~for~~a ~~reclamation~~portion ~~for~~of any ~~areas~~future ~~disturbed~~amounts ~~by Company~~paid. ~~The Company has not exercised the option and is still evaluating the property and material.~~

As permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its Bylaws, Greentech Mining International indemnifies its officers and directors for certain expenses incurred from legal or other proceedings that arise as a result of the director or officer’s service to the Company. There is no limitation on the term of the indemnification and the maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. The Company currently does not have a directors and officers insurance policy that could limit its exposure and enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company believes the fair value of these officer and director indemnification agreements is minimal, and, accordingly, has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of September 30, 2012.

From time to time, the Company may be involved in claims and other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is not currently aware of any matters that it believes are likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

12On May 10, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to amend payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 that was previously extended to May 1, 2013 has now been extended to October 1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to June 1, 2013 has now been extended to November 1, 2013.

On May 10, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into a verbal agreement with Union Gulf Resources Ltd. to amend payment terms of the Mineral Claim Option Agreement entered into on September 22, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the consideration of three million five hundred dollars ($3,500,000) with the first payment of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) being made on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to April 31, 2013 has been extended to August 1, 2013 and the remaining seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting March 1, 2013 previously extended to start August 1, 2013 has been extended to November 1, 2013 and a final payment of $300,000 that was due December 1, 2014 previously extended to April 30, 2015 has been extended to August 1, 2015.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 4, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with a commodities company incorporated under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Mexico and a project management company incorporated under the laws of Germany, collectively called “Parties”. The Parties agreed to form a joint venture company “JV Company” located in the United States to operate various mining projects as agreed upon by the Parties. Pursuant to the agreement, the commodities company will provide a Bank Guarantee issued for a one year and one month period with annual renewals for a total of three years in the amount of Five Hundred Million Euros (€500,000,000) that will be immediately assigned to the JV Company after the initial formation and utilized to collateralize a loan to fund the JV Company.

The Parties agreed that the JV Company will be named Greentech Mining Ventures, Inc. and shall be registered in the State of Delaware, USA as a “C” corporation and that Matthew J. Neher shall be Chief Executive Officer and Kevin Senn shall be the Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the JV Company. The Bylaws of the JV Company shall specify that there shall be five members of the Board of Directors of which three shall be selected by the Greentech Mining International, Inc. one shall be selected by the commodity company and one Independent Member to be selected by the other four members. Greentech Mining International, Inc, has been elected to operate the Mining Projects for the JV Company and conduct all business affairs controlling 63% of the JV Company.

The Parties agreed to typical representations and warranties for mining joint ventures and attests that all documents, declarations, funds and bank instruments that will be engaged are clean, clear and of non-criminal origin. Furthermore, Greentech Mining International, Inc. shall have continuing responsibility for environmental compliance of the Mining Projects and shall be solely responsible for ensuring the JV Company property and mining assets are and will remain in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws.

- 14 -

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on ~~June~~July 2615, ~~2012~~2013, and Form 8-K filed on September 19, ~~2019~~2012 provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those implied or projected in this Current Report on Form 10-Q. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this report.

Overview

We are aan ~~development~~exploration-stage ~~exploration~~ mining company that recently acquired options to explore and operate mining activities which include a processing plant, 3,940 acres of mining claims in Utah and 60 acres of patented mining claims in Arizona ~~containing 1~~.5 ~~million tons of stockpiled ore for processing.~~ Before we entered into the mining option agreements we were a “blank check” company and had no operations. Shares of our common stock are not registered for resale, and accordingly there is no public trading market for our common stock. We have a very limited amount of cash and will have to raise significant funds in order to further develop our product candidates.

Plan of Operation

Greentech Mining International, Inc. is a precious metals mining exploration and processing company that has identified potential mining projects both domestically and internationally that it intends to develop into producing mines. The Company’s initial project is the Henry Mountain Project that consists of all 671 acres of Section 36, Township 29 South, Range 11 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, in Wayne County, Utah upon which an operating gravimetric circuit (system to separate minerals by weight) has been built on the private property. In addition, the Henry Mountain Project includes the following Federal Government owned mining claims managed by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”):

GOLDEN EAGLE CLAIM GROUP, 105 Placer Claims (loose material such as sand or gravel) totaling 2100 acres – Garfield County, Utah

Claim Numbers UMC 413213 - UMC413309

Claim Numbers UMC414263 – UMC 414270

SILVER EAGLE CLAIM GROUP, 25 Lode Claims (hard rock deposit) totaling 500 acres – Garfield County, Utah

Claim Numbers UMC414271 – UMC414295

BALD EAGLE CLAIM GROUP, 43 Lode Claims (hard rock deposit) totaling 860 acres – Garfield County, Utah

Claim Numbers UMC414196 – UMC414238

COPPER EAGLE CLAIM GROUP, 24 Lode Claims (hard rock deposit) totaling 480 acres – Garfield County, Utah

Claim Numbers UMC414239 – UMC414262

Out of those claim groups there is a BLM permit to commence small mining operations on 8.264 acres claim #103 in the Golden Eagle claim group and is a twenty acre placer claim. GMI intends to conduct operation and exploration activities thereon upon the posting of a $51,000 dollar reclamation bond. GMI has contracted with Greentech Mining, Inc. (“Owner”) to develop and operate the Henry Mountain claims and to run the existing processing plant. The Company has executed an Operating and Exploration Contract with an Option to Purchase all of the assets and machinery at the Henry Mountain Project. Pursuant to the Option Agreement, Greentech Mining, Inc. is responsible for BLM property fees and permit fees of an estimated $50,000 dollars per year that will be reimbursed by GMI until the Option to Purchase has been exercised, as set forth in the Option Agreement.

~~GMI~~- ~~has~~15 contracted with Greentech Mining, Inc. (“Owner”) to develop and operate the Henry Mountain claims and to run the existing processing plant. The Company has executed an Operating and Exploration Contract with an Option to Purchase all of the assets and machinery at the Henry Mountain Project. Pursuant to the Option Agreement, Greentech Mining, Inc. is responsible for BLM property fees and permit fees of an estimated $50,000 dollars per year that will be reimbursed by GMI until the Option to Purchase has been exercised, as set forth in the Option Agreement.-

The Company intends to take a two -phase approach to expanding operations and ~~conducting~~conduct exploration efforts on the Henry Mountain claim groups. In Phase 1I, the ~~company~~Company will amend the existing processing facility’s ~~permits~~Conditional toUse ~~increase~~Permit that on September 6, 2012 began a new term and automatically renews as long as there is no adverse effect on the ~~scope~~community. ofThe ~~operations~~permit ~~from~~allows ~~R&D~~us to engage in mineral processing activities and ~~pilot~~conduct ~~scale~~business ~~operations~~under conditions designed to ~~commercial~~protect ~~scale~~the ~~operations,~~neighborhood ~~meaning~~and the ~~commercial-scale~~community. ~~operation~~The ofamended ~~any~~permits ~~part~~will ofallow the ~~property~~Company asto aincrease ~~mine~~the ~~by,~~scope orof onoperations ~~behalf~~from ~~of,~~R&D ~~GMI,~~and ~~but~~pilot ~~does~~scale ~~not~~operations ~~include~~(10 ~~processing~~tons of material ~~carried~~per ~~out~~hour) into acommercial ~~pilot~~scale ~~plant~~operations or(100 ~~processing~~tons ~~material~~per ~~for~~hour) and ~~other~~will ~~testing~~include ~~purposes.~~the ~~Commercial~~utilization ~~production~~of ~~shall~~a beleaching ~~deemed~~system, toflotation ~~have~~system ~~commenced~~and onelectro-wining ~~the~~system. ~~day~~The ~~immediately~~Company estimates ~~following~~that the ~~first~~amended ~~five~~permitting ~~(5)~~process ~~consecutive~~will ~~days~~take ~~during~~approximately ~~which~~one ~~minerals~~hundred ~~have~~eighty ~~been~~days ~~produced~~for ~~by,~~the orWayne onCounty ~~behalf~~Planning ~~of,~~Commission to review and approve the ~~Company~~amendment. In parallel, GMI will fabricate install and test additional equipment for processing material imported from ~~third~~other ~~parties~~mines in preparation of achieving commercial level production. During this phase the Company will also test gravel samples from several ~~other~~ mines to determine the feasibility of importing and processing mined material from third parties. ~~The~~Once we have defined a proven or probable reserve at the mine sites and a bankable feasibility study the Company ~~will~~intends ~~use~~to screen the ~~current~~material ~~pilot~~removing all oversize rock and debris which carry very little value. Then the material would be transported by truck to the GMI facility that is currently fully equipped with a ten ton per hour gravity separation system, which is 12 miles from the Henry Mountain mine site. At the GMI facility the material would be stored in the material bins and sent to ~~incubate~~the ~~mining~~crushing ~~projects~~grinding facility where metals is intended to ~~evaluate~~be ~~potential~~further ~~commercial~~released ~~scale~~from ~~production~~the ~~levels~~rock ~~under~~by crushing techniques. Once crushed, the material is screened, classified by particle size and the heaver particles are sent to the triple deck and Deister table for final gravity separation designed to produce a black sand metal concentrate that can be smelted. Upon receiving the amended permit (as described above) the Company plans to upgrade the current system (10 tons per hour) to 100 tons per hour and incorporate a leach, flotation and electrowinning systems into the processing ~~contracts~~circuit. ~~with~~The ~~third~~enhancements ~~party~~of ~~mine~~our ~~owners~~extraction capabilities are intended increase the probability of producing a gold purity of 99.99 percent as part of our Phase II implementation.

13Additional, Phase I includes the Company financing the approved BLM Plan of Operation reclamation bond for the Golden Eagle claim #103 and starting exploration under the current Small Mine permit. This phase will consist of validation of previous exploration programs completed by previous mine owners expanding our prospecting, mapping, sampling and ultimately diamond drilling (Exploration Expenses), our option agreement, equipment purchases for the mine site and the processing plant, effective mine planning (Option and Processing Plant) and other general administrative expenses (Other Expenditures). The implementation will be facilitated at a cost of $3,000,000 to the Company as outlined in the table on page 18 below.

Additional, Phase I includes the Company financing the approved BLM Plan of Operation reclamation bond for the Golden Eagle claim #103 and starting exploration under the current Small Mine permit. This phase will consist of validation of previous exploration programs completed by previous mine owners expanding our prospecting, mapping, sampling and ultimately diamond drilling (Exploration Expenses), our option agreement, equipment purchases for the mine site and the processing plant, effective mine planning (Option, Mine Site and Processing Plant) and other general administrative expenses (Other Expenditures). The implementation will be facilitated at a cost of $3,000,000 to the Company as outlined in the table on page 18 below.

In Phase II, the Company will analyze the exploration data completed by certified and licensed professionals to determine the feasibility of executing the current Plan of Operations approved by the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, (“DOGM”), and the BLM. After the Company accesses the data, any modifications, if any, will be identified and the proper amendments will be submitted to DOGM and BLM for approvals. The Company will identify and implement the mining method(s) best adapted to maximize production, including: (i) effective extraction of material delineated by the exploration, mine geology and grade control department., (ii) proper handling of material and blending method to attain an economical grade without sacrificing the quality of the material (Exploration Expense), (iii) proper, effective and economical milling plant operation that can recover the gold at the highest percentage possible, and (iv) proper disposal of plant tails (Option, Mine Site and Processing Plant) and other general administrative expenses (Other Expenditures) as outlined in the table on page 18 below.

Our current plans, predicated on raising $15,000,000 from the sale of common stock to begin with Phase I. If Phase I is favorable, we would then start Phase II that transitions the Company into a precious metals production company at an estimated cost of $12,000,000, which is a reflection of local costs for the type of work program planned. We will proceed to Phase II only if we are successful in being able to secure the capital funding required to complete Phase II. Therefore, we expect to expend $3,000,000 on Phase I.

Phase I may require up to sixteen weeks for the base work and an additional two ~~to three~~ months for analysis, evaluation of the work completed and the preparation of a report. The cost for Phase I is inclusive the aforementioned expenses and includes wages, fees, geological and geochemical supplies, assaying, equipment, trucking and operation costs. It was our intention to carry the work out in 2012 and early 2013, predicated on completion of the off the financing described in this document and as of the date of this filing the Company has not received the financing to proceed with this plan of operation. Once the Company is financed and has completed Phase I we will assess the results of this program upon receipt of an appropriate engineering or geological report. It is our intention to retain a US-educated geoscientist to evaluate and conform to American standards the phase I work program and to author a report to American standards for future capital raising. Phase II is not planned to be carried out until 2013 and will be contingent upon favorable results from phase I and specific recommendations of a professional geoscientist based on those results. Favorable results means that a geoscientist, engineer or other recognized professional states that there is a strong likelihood of value being added by transitioning into a precious metals production company, makes a written recommendation that we proceed to the next phase of production, a resolution is approved by the Board of Directors of the Company indicating such work should proceed and that it is feasible to finance the next phase of production. We are presently in the exploration stage of our business and under Industry Guide 7 companies cannot enter the development stage or production stage until we have completed comprehensive exploration work which includes metallurgical testing and defined a proven or probable reserve with a bankable feasibility study.

~~Under~~- ~~the~~16 terms of the Option Agreement the Company shall make payment to Owner for the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars (1,000,000) being paid on or before May 1, 2013 (verbally amended by the Owner from November 1, 2012) and the remaining balance made in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on June 1, 2013 (verbally amended by the Owner from December 1, 2012). Owner warrants and covenants that it will utilize the funds to remove encumbrances and hold full title and exclusive possession of the Mines and Processing Plant free and clear from all grants, sales, liens, defects, adverse claims and encumbrances of any kind by November 15, 2013.-

Under the terms of the Option Agreement the Company shall make payment to Owner for the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars (1,000,000) being paid on or before May 1, 2013 (verbally amended by the Owner from November 1, 2012) and the remaining balance made in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on June 1, 2013 (verbally amended by the Owner from December 1, 2012). Owner warrants and covenants that it will utilize the funds to remove encumbrances and hold full title and exclusive possession of the Mines and Processing Plant free and clear from all grants, sales, liens, defects, adverse claims and encumbrances of any kind by November 15, 2013.

The Company shall perform exploration, mining, development, production, processing or any other activity (“Work” herein) which benefits the Henry Mountain Project at a minimum cost of $3,000,000 for the first year, $3,000,000 for the second year, and $3,000,000 for the third year of the Option Agreement commencing on September 20, 2012. All work on other lands within 500 feet of the boundary of any portion of the Henry Mountain Project shall be deemed to benefit the Henry Mountain Project for the work commitment if such work is part of an overall plan or project that includes the Henry Mountain Project. All costs expended for work in excess of $3,000,000 for any one (1) year term shall accrue and be applied to the Option Agreement price as described below. In the event that the Company does not perform work in the amount of the entire minimum expenditure required for the applicable year (which amount will include any excess amount accrued from the prior three year term), the Company shall pay Owner the amount of any such shortage in cash or cash equivalents within 30 days after the end of each three (3) year term. In addition, the Company shall establish a contingency reclamation reserve fund for the purpose of assuring payment of reclamation costs caused by the Company. The reclamation cost shall be deducted from Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) returns on all materials produced and sold from the Henry Mountain Project, after the Owner’s royalties are computed, five percent (5%) of the value thereof, for the purpose of a contingency reclamation reserve fund for paying potential reclamation costs, up to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).

Owner also granted the Company the sole and exclusive option to purchase all of Owner’s right, title and interest in the property (the Contracted Mines and Processing Plant) for a total purchase price of TWO MILLION dollars ($2,000,000), plus a perpetual two percent (2%) Net Smelter Royalty (hereinafter referred to as the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price may be paid in cash or other cash equivalent as mutually agreed by the Owner and Company. Exercise of the option shall be no sooner than November 15, 2013 unless Owner removes the estimated $1.4 million in encumbrances and holds full title and exclusive possession of the Contracted Mines and Processing Plant free and clear from all grants, sales, liens, defects, adverse claims and encumbrances of any kind prior to November 15, 2013 or if Owner utilizes all or a portion of the purchase price to remove all encumbrances and holds full title and exclusive possession of the Contracted Mines and Processing Plant free and clear from all grants, sales, liens, defects, adverse claims and encumbrances of any kind to be so transferred. Exercise of the option shall be effective upon delivery of written notice thereof to Owner at Owner’s business address or the address of Owner’s registered agent. The Company shall deliver to Owner a negotiable instrument in the full amount of the Purchase Price in exchange for properly executed and acknowledged Deeds and/or other indicia of ownership in recordable form. Closing shall occur within sixty (60) days after exercise of the option.

The term of the Agreement is for three (3) years from the effective date set forth above, and may be renewed by the Company for successive three (3) year periods upon substantially the same terms and provisions as set forth herein based upon the then-capital structure of the Company, until declared forfeited and canceled by Owner or relinquished by GMI as provided herein. The Company shall give Owner written notice of each renewal at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the respective three-year term. The Option Agreement shall automatically renew and continue so long as minerals, or metals are produced or sold from the Henry Mountain Project on a continuous basis. The Company shall have the continuing right to terminate the Agreement at any time and to surrender the Henry Mountain Project to Owner by giving Owner written notice thereof at least 30 days prior to the stated date of termination. Termination of the Option Agreement shall not relieve GMI of its obligation to pay all royalties due to Owner hereunder as well as its pro-rata share of taxes and fees.

The Company’s funding plans include selling additional capital stock and/or borrowing to fund the aforementioned expenses. The Company intends to approach Hedge Funds, Venture Capital Groups, Private Investment Groups and other Institutional Investment Groups in its efforts to achieve future funding.

The Company will require significant additional financing in order to advance the Company’s business plan, achieve the milestones and generate revenue to avoid the discontinuation of the Option Agreement. We intend on seeking financing for Phase I that includes $~~554~~454,750 for management and exploration, $12,~~896~~196,750 for our option payments, ~~equipment at the mine site and~~ processing plant and ~~548~~348,500 for other general operating expenses for a total of $3 million. The Company will also seek financing for Phase II that includes $2,164,250 for management and exploration, $8,174,250 for our option, equipment at the mining site and processing plant and $1,661,500 for other general operating expenses for a total of $12 million The Company therefore intends to raise an aggregate of $15 million in 2013, the proceeds of which would be utilized as follows:

15- 17 -

On May 10, 2013 Greentech Mining International, Inc. enter into an agreement with Greentech Mining, Inc. and Grenntech Mining Utah to amend payment terms of the Operating, Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement entered into on September 17, 2012. Pursuant to the agreement the parties agreed that the initial consideration of three million dollars ($3,000,000) with the first payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) being made on or before November 1, 2012 that was previously extended to May 1, 2013 has now been extended to October 1, 2013 and the remaining balance paid in ten (10) consecutive payments of $200,000 beginning on December 1, 2012 that was previously extended to June 1, 2013 has now been extended to November 1, 2013.

Management and Exploration related expenses:
	Phase I		Phase II		Total
Management 1	$	172,250	$	616,750	$	789,000
Exploration 2	$	~~382~~282,500		1,547,500		1,~~930~~830,000
Processing expenditures:
Option, Mine Site and Processing Plant	$	12,~~682~~082,750		7,532,250		9,~~215~~615,000
Plant employees	$	~~214~~114,000		642,000		~~856~~756,000
Other expenditures:
Advertising and Public Relations	$	20,000		130,000		150,000
Rent and other payables	$	103,700		303,000		406,700
Finance, legal, accounting and closing costs	$	154,500		403,800		558,300
Increase in Working Capital	$	~~270~~70,300		824,700		1895,~~095,~~000
Total Use of Proceeds	$	3,000,000	$	12,000,000	$	15,000,000

~~______________~~___________________

(1) Includes base compensation, benefits and expenses for director-level, and above, domestic and international employees over a two year time frame with the number of management team members (4) ramping up commensurate with the staff build-up. Of the total, 65% is for base compensation, 13% for benefits and taxes, and 22% for expenses.

(2) Compensation for an estimated domestic and international staff ramping up to 16 full-time-equivalent (FTE) exploration and processing plant employees over a one year time frame. Of the total, 80% is for base compensation (average salary, $60,000); with 20% for benefits and taxes are included with general ~~exploration~~exploxzration costs.

Additionally, The Company enter into an option agreement on September 2122, 2012 with Union Gulf Resources Ltd.(Optionor) for the Portland, Sunshine and Sunshine No. 2 Patented mining claims, situated in Sections 14 and 15, Township 23 North, Range 21 West of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Mohave County, Arizona, in the Minnesota Mining District, being shown on Mineral Survey No. 3757 on file in the Bureau of Land Management, as granted by Patent No. 909600 recorded September 1, 1923, in Book 32 of Deeds, Page 306; also known as Mohave County Parcel Numbers 35009001 (Sunshine & Sunshine #2) and 35009002 (Portland).

- 18 -

Portland Mine, Lost Cabin Wash, Pilgrim District,

Black Mts, Mohave Co., Arizona, USA

Latitude: 35°22'50"N

Longitude: 114°30'44"W

·	Ref.: Conrad, J.E., et al (1990), Mineral Resources of the Black Mountains North and Burns Spring Wilderness Study Areas, Mohave County, Arizona

·	USGS Bull. 1737-C: C2; AZ Dept. Min. Resources - Portland Mine files; US Bur. Mines file data cluster NO 1439 - Portland Mine;

·	USGS Info. Circ. 6901 (1936): 48; Gardner, E.D. (1936), Gold mining and milling in the Black Mountains, western Mohave County, Arizona,

·	US Bur. Mines Info. Circ. 6901: 48; Niemuth, N.J. (1987), Arizona Mineral Development 1984-1986, AZ Dept. Mines & Min. Resources Directory 29;AZ Dept. Min. Resources (ADMR) Portland Mine file;

·	Bur. Land Mgmt. Arizona Mining claim file No. 28157;

·	MRDS files #10088844 & 10283253.

16An open pit gold mine located between the Black Mountains North and Burns Spring Wilderness Study areas on the west side of the Black Mountains. Probably discovered in the early 1930's as an underground and surface mine. Mining operations began in 1935 or early 1936. Estimated to have been closed in the early 1940's and reopened by the Western States Minerals Corp. in March, 1985 and produced gold between 1985 and 1989. Mineralization is a 5 to 20 foot thick, north-trending, brecciated quartz and calcite vein, striking approximately north and dipping 20є to 30є east and in 10 to150 feet of stockwork in the footwall. Undated quartz diorite and basalt dikes are exposed in the footwall, and Tertiary andesite and latite make up the hanging wall. Altered rhyolite, which crops out in both wilderness study areas, NE of the mine, has anomalous surface and sub-surface gold concentrations. Workings are an open pit mine and approximately 1,000,000 tons of ore was removed in the most recent mining period (Charles Williams, geologist, Western States Minerals Corp., oral commun., 1988; Pete Drobeck, consultant, oral commun., 1988).

AnA ~~open~~2.5-ft-wide ~~pit~~fault ~~gold~~zone ~~mine~~striking ~~located~~N. ~~between~~80° ~~the~~E. ~~Black Mountains North~~ and ~~Burns~~dipping ~~Spring~~45° ~~Wilderness Study areas on the west side of the Black Mountains~~N. ~~Probably~~is ~~discovered~~exposed in ~~the~~a ~~early~~shaft ~~1930's~~a asfew anhundred ~~underground~~feet ~~and~~southeast ~~surface~~of ~~mine.~~leach ~~Mining~~pads ~~operations~~at ~~began~~the inPortland ~~1935 or early 1936~~mine. ~~Estimated~~The tozone ~~have~~cuts ~~been~~andesite ~~closed in the early 1940's~~ and ~~reopened~~consists byof ~~the~~red-brown ~~Western~~gouge ~~States Minerals Corp. in March, 1985~~ and ~~produced~~brecciated ~~gold between 1985 and 1989~~andesite. ~~Mineralization~~A ~~is a~~ 2.5-ft-long tochip 20sample ~~foot~~collected ~~thick,~~across ~~north-trending,~~the ~~brecciated~~fault ~~quartz~~zone ~~and~~contains ~~calcite vein~~7,830 ~~striking~~parts ~~approximately~~per ~~north~~billion ~~and~~(ppb) ~~dipping~~or ~~20º~~0.23 totroy ~~30º~~oz ~~east~~gold and in41 10parts ~~to150~~per ~~feet~~million of(ppm) ~~stockwork~~or ~~in the footwall~~1.2 ~~Undated~~troy ~~quartz~~oz ~~diorite~~silver. ~~and~~The ~~basalt~~fault ~~dikes~~zone ~~are~~is ~~exposed~~not intraceable at the ~~footwall,~~surface ~~and~~due ~~Tertiary~~to ~~andesite~~alluvial ~~and~~cover ~~latite~~(Neubert, ~~make up the hanging wall~~J. ~~Altered rhyolite~~T., ~~which crops out in both wilderness study areas~~1989, NEMineral resources of the ~~mine,~~Black ~~has~~Mountains ~~anomalous~~North ~~surface~~(AZ-020-009) and ~~sub-surface~~Burns ~~gold~~Spring ~~concentrations.~~(AZ-020-010) ~~Workings~~Wilderness ~~are~~Study anAreas, ~~open~~Mohave ~~pit~~County, ~~mine~~Arizona: ~~and~~U.S. ~~approximately~~Bureau ~~1,000,000 tons~~ of ~~ore~~Mines ~~was~~Open-File ~~removed~~Report in1-89, ~~the~~78 ~~most recent mining period~~p.)

~~Optionor~~In ~~granted~~October, ~~unto~~2012 the Company ~~exclusive~~conducted ~~and~~limited ~~irrevocable~~testing ~~right,~~to ~~during~~verify the ~~due~~previous ~~diligence~~reports ~~review~~on ~~term~~the property that included an estimated ton of ~~this~~material ~~agreement,~~that was taken from three main areas of ~~first~~the ~~refusal~~Portland mine property to the processing facility in Hanksville, Utah. These samples were fire assayed by Copper State Analytical Lab before and after entering the gravity separation system. The first ~~option~~samples toof ~~purchase,~~approximately ~~upon~~one third of a ton (666 pounds) was taken from the ~~terms~~prior heap leach crushed material pile (AZWS) and ~~conditions~~before ~~within~~entering the ~~agreement,~~gravity ~~Optionor’s~~separation ~~property~~system isfire ~~situated~~assay results indicated that there was gold value in ~~Mohave~~the ~~County,~~material ~~Arizona,~~of ~~including~~.030 ~~without~~ounces ~~limitation~~per ton. When the ~~above~~AZWS ~~described~~material ~~property~~was ~~together~~fire ~~with~~assayed ~~all~~on ~~improvements~~completion ~~located~~of ~~thereon~~gravity separation it indicated that the gold value in the black sand concentrated material (AZWS Cons) was 2.99 ~~The~~ounces ~~right~~per ofton. ~~first~~The ~~refusal~~second orsamples ~~first~~of ~~option~~approximately toone ~~purchase~~third ~~may~~of ~~only~~a beton ~~exercised~~were byred ~~the~~rocks ~~Company~~ranging ~~within~~from ~~fourteen~~3-6 ~~days~~inches in diameter (14AZR) ~~days~~taken from ~~notification~~various byareas ~~Optionor~~on ~~that~~the ~~Optionor’s~~property. ~~desires~~These tosamples ~~sell~~were crushed and fire assayed indicating gold values of .015 ounces per ton. The samples were then put through the ~~subject~~gravity ~~property~~separation system and on completion were split into two groups AZR # 1 Cons and AZR #2 Cons. ~~Optionor~~Testing isresults ~~obligated~~of toAZR ~~provide~~# ~~such~~1 ~~notice~~Cons toindicated that the ~~Company~~gold ~~prior~~values towere ~~offering~~3.55 ounces per ton in the ~~subject~~fire ~~property~~assay. toTesting aresults ~~third~~for ~~party~~AZR # 2 Cons indicated that the gold values were 9.69 ounces per ton in the fire assay. The ~~Compn~~third ~~shall~~samples beof ~~responsible~~approximately ~~for~~one ~~any~~third ~~and~~of ~~all~~a ~~property~~ton ~~payments~~was ~~due~~white toquartz’s ~~any~~looking ~~governmental~~rocks ~~authority~~ranging from 3-6 inches in diameter (AZR) taken from various areas on the ~~Property~~property. ~~during~~These ~~the~~samples ~~terms~~were crushed and fire assayed indicating gold values of ~~this~~.259 ~~Option~~ounces ~~Agreement~~per ton. The ~~Company~~samples ~~will~~were ~~also~~then beput ~~responsible~~through ~~for~~the ~~reclamation~~gravity separation system and on completion were split into two groups AZW # 1 Cons and AZW #2 Cons. Testing results of AZW # 1 Cons indicated that the gold values were 9.91 ounces per ton. Testing results for ~~any~~AZW ~~areas~~# ~~disturbed~~2 byCons indicated that the ~~Company~~gold values were 29.81 ounces per ton in the fire assay.

~~The~~- ~~Company~~19 has the right to remove and conduct evaluation of five hundred tons (500) of material that is stockpiled on the Property in the due diligence review with respect to the Property and title thereto and shall be satisfied with same, in its sole discretion. The cost of the evaluation is estimated to be $100,000 and will come out of the working capital budget.-

Pursuant to the agreement, the Optionor gave an option to purchase a 100% interest in certain mining claims located in the state of Arizona. In consideration of the option to purchase, Greentech Mining International, Inc. agreed to, provided that the Company has not abandoned the property, the Company will pay to the Optionor $3,500,000 US Dollars with the first payment of $750,000 on December 1, 2012, seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting March 1, 2013 and a final payment of $300,000 on December 1, 2014. The Company has entered into a verbal agreement with the Optionor to extend the payment terms that were to begin on December 1, 2012 to beginning on May 1, 2013, seven payments of $350,000 every three months starting August 1, 2013 and a final payment of $300,000 on May 1, 2015.

The ~~Agreement~~Optionor ~~provides~~granted ~~for~~unto the ~~deeding~~Company ofexclusive ~~the~~and ~~claims~~irrevocable ~~from~~right, ~~Optionor~~during to the ~~Company~~due atdiligence ~~Closing,~~review ~~and~~term aof ~~recordation~~this agreement, of ~~said~~first ~~deed~~refusal ~~allowing~~and ~~the~~first ~~Company~~option to ~~explore~~purchase, ~~extract~~upon ~~and process material on~~ the ~~property~~terms ~~throughout~~and ~~the~~conditions ~~term~~within of the agreement., InOptionor’s ~~consideration~~property ofis ~~such~~situated ~~transfer~~ in ~~advance~~Mohave ofCounty, ~~full payment~~Arizona, ~~the~~including ~~Company~~without ~~will~~limitation ~~grant~~the toabove ~~Optionor~~described aproperty ~~first~~together ~~position~~with ~~security~~all ~~interest~~improvements inlocated ~~the~~thereon. ~~two~~The ~~patented~~right ~~mining~~of ~~claims~~first ~~until~~refusal ~~such~~or ~~time~~first asoption ~~the~~to purchase ~~price~~may ~~has~~only ~~been~~be ~~paid~~exercised inby ~~full;~~the atCompany ~~which~~within ~~time~~fourteen ~~the~~days ~~security~~(14) ~~interest~~days ~~shall~~from ~~terminate,~~notification by ~~providing~~Optionor tothat Optionor,’s ~~the~~desires ~~owner of said claims, an original, notarized and signed quit claim deed back~~ to ~~the~~sell ~~said property in~~ the ~~event~~subject ~~of default or termination~~property. Optionor ~~shall~~is ~~hold~~obligated ~~said~~to ~~deed~~provide ~~and~~such ~~agrees~~notice ~~not~~ to ~~file~~the ~~said~~Company ~~deed~~prior ~~unless~~to ~~Buyer~~offering ~~is in default of this Agreement, or~~ the ~~Company~~subject ~~voluntarily~~property ~~terminates~~to ~~this~~a ~~Agreement~~third party. IfThe ~~the~~ Company ~~sells~~shall ~~said~~be ~~Property,~~responsible ~~Optionor~~for ~~agrees~~any toand ~~destroy~~all ~~said~~property ~~deed,~~payments ordue ~~deliver~~ to ~~the~~any ~~Company~~governmental ~~for~~authority ~~destruction,~~on ~~once~~ the ~~Company~~Property ~~has~~during ~~paid Optionor in full for~~ the ~~purchase~~terms of ~~said~~this ~~Property~~Option Agreement. The Company ~~has~~will ~~not~~also ~~exercised~~be ~~the~~responsible ~~option~~for ~~and~~reclamation ~~continues~~for toany ~~evaluate~~areas ~~the~~disturbed ~~property~~by ~~and~~the ~~material~~Company.

The Company has the right to remove and conduct evaluation of five hundred tons (500) of material that is stockpiled on the Property in the due diligence review with respect to the Property and title thereto and shall be satisfied with same, in its sole discretion. The cost of the evaluation is estimated to be $60,000 and will come out of the working capital budget.

The Agreement provides for the deeding of the claims from Optionor to the Company at Closing, and a recordation of said deed allowing the Company to explore, extract and process material on the property throughout the term of the agreement. In consideration of such transfer in advance of full payment, the Company will grant to Optionor a first position security interest in the two patented mining claims until such time as the purchase price has been paid in full at which time the security interest shall terminate, by Optionor.

There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise this or any amount of additional capital and a failure to do so would have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s ability, or would cause significant delays in its ability to address the market for exploration, developing, mining and processing minerals and achieve its Business Plan, it estimated the minimum amount of capital the company needs to raise over the next twelve months is $1 million to continue operations. Neither the Company nor any of its advisors or consultants has significant experience in raising funds similar to the $15,000,000 estimated to be required,

Going Concern

Because we only had $~~200~~49 in cash at March 31, ~~2012~~2013, our most recent fiscal year-end, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements for the period ended March 31, ~~2012~~2013 contained an explanatory paragraph regarding their substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors’ opinion is based upon our operating losses and our need to obtain additional financing to sustain operations. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing necessary for it to meet its obligations, explore and produce precious metals, and ultimately generate revenues from the sale of these products. Although there are no formal dates or agreements with Company’s directors, they have agreed to fund certain administrative operating expenses of the Company until the Company succeeds in raising additional funds. Management’s plans include raising additional funds through an equity financing or licensing transaction in order to meet the Company’s obligations and develop its product candidates, but funding may not be available and the Company may be unsuccessful in raising additional capital of any type. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise as a result of this uncertainty.

17- 20 -

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

~~Critical~~Our ~~Accounting~~significant ~~Policies~~accounting policies are more fully disclosed in Note 1 to the financial statements we included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on July 15, 2013. However, some of our accounting policies may be more particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and ~~Use~~results of ~~Estimates~~operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. To date, due to our limited operations, we believe the only accounting policy which has required significant judgment or use of estimates, other than our assumption that we will continue as a going concern, is our estimated charge for stock-based compensation. Our accounting for stock-based compensation does not impact our current financial position, but does have a major impact on our statement of operations.

Our significant accounting policies are more fully disclosed in Note 1 to the financial statements we included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on June 26, 2012. However, some of our accounting policies may be more particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. To date, due to our limited operations, we believe the only accounting policy which has required significant judgment or use of estimates, other than our assumption that we will continue as a going concern, is our estimated charge for stock-based compensation. Our accounting for stock-based compensation does not impact our current financial position, but does have a major impact on our statement of operations.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock awards granted to recipients using an estimate of the fair value of the stock award on the date that the award is granted. This estimated fair value of the stock award is recognized as an expense in the statement of operations on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the underlying stock award, which is generally four years for stock options granted to employees. There is a high degree of subjectivity involved in estimating the input values needed to estimate the fair value of stock options and other awards. For Greentech Mining international in particular, our stock has never traded and therefore it is difficult to determine the underlying fair value of our common stock on each date a stock award is made. Changes in the estimated value of the underlying stock will materially affect the resulting estimates of the fair values of the awards that are granted. Also, the expenses recorded for stock-based compensation in our financial statements may differ significantly from the actual value realized by the recipients, and these expenses are not adjusted to the actual amounts, if any, realized. Users of the financial statements should also understand that the expenses we recognize for stock-based compensation do not result in payments of cash by us.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We do not believe that there are any recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not adopted which are likely to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or other disclosures.

Results of Operations

During the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013, which was the ~~third~~first quarter of our fiscal year ending March 31, ~~2013~~2014, we had no revenue and incurred general and administrative expenses of $~~33,293~~4. ~~Our~~For ~~net~~the ~~loss~~period ~~was~~from ~~$33~~inception (February 6,~~293,~~ ~~due~~2012) tothrough ~~general~~June ~~and~~30, ~~administrative~~2013, ~~expenses.~~the ~~General~~Company ~~and~~had ~~administrative~~no ~~expenses~~activities ~~for~~that ~~the~~produced ~~third~~revenues ~~quarter~~from ofoperations ~~fiscal~~and ~~2013~~had ~~consisted~~a net loss of $24109,~~700~~349, ~~for~~due ~~the~~to ~~mining~~legal, ~~equipment~~accounting, audit and ~~$8,593~~other ~~for~~professional ~~administrative~~service ~~support,~~fees ~~which~~incurred ~~mostly~~in ~~consisted~~relation ofto ~~document~~the ~~preparation~~formation ~~for~~of ~~formation~~the Company and ~~EDGAR~~the ~~filings~~filing ~~with~~of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed in February 2012 and other SEC-related compliance matters.

For the nine months ended December 31, 2012, we had no revenue and incurred general and administrative expenses of $106,820. Our net loss was $106,820, due to general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the first nine months of fiscal 2012 consisted of $24,700 for the mining equipment and $82,120 for administrative support, which mostly consisted of document preparation for formation and EDGAR filings with the SEC.

For the period from inception (February 6, 2012) through December 31, 2012, the Company had no activities that produced revenues from operations and had a net loss of $108,620, due to legal, accounting, audit and other professional service fees incurred in relation to the formation of the Company and the filing of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed in February 2012 and other SEC-related compliance matters.

To date, our general and administrative expenses have been funded by Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC, or AVP. Expenses include legal fees, accounting fees, costs associated with SEC filings and preparation of documents. The mining equipment has been funded by Matthew Neher and Novus Aurum Trust and there is no formal agreement in place with AVP or Novus Aurum Trust for the repayment of the expenditures.

We expect that, if we are successful in securing additional capital, future general and administrative expenses will increase significantly as compared to the period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013. In addition, we expect to incur exploration and processing expenses as we seek to advance our operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resource

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013, we had a cash balance of only $~~778~~49 in cash and $~~3,000,000~~0 in other assets ~~that include the land~~, ~~water~~are ~~rights and the milling facility (the buildings and equipment). We~~ accrued expenses were approximately $~~108~~109,~~620,~~349 of which $8079,~~098~~223 is due to AVP and $24,700 due to Matthew Neher and Novus Aurum Trust related parties. We had a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $~~104~~103,~~020~~874 and no means to pay the liabilities in excess of our assets. AVP has agreed to fund certain administrative operating expenses of the Company until the financing is completed.

We have recorded the estimated fair value of the Greentech mining and milling assets as an aggregate amount on our condensed balance sheet. The assets include the land, water rights and the milling facility (the buildings and equipment).

The following is a summary of the Company's cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities:

~~For~~- ~~the~~21 ~~Cumulative Period from Inception (February 6, 2012) through December 31, 2012~~-

Operating activities	$	(108,620)
Investing activities		-
Financing activities	$	109,398
Net effect on cash	$	778

For the Cumulative Period from Inception (February 6, 2012) through June 30, 2013

Operating activities	$	(5,426)
Investing activities		-
Financing activities	$	5,475

Net effect on cash	$	49

If the Company succeeds in raising additional funds, at which point the administrative operating expenses will be due. However, AVP may seek to force earlier payment of the amounts which we owe, or AVP may decide in the future not to continue funding costs on behalf of Greentech, although we are not aware of any plans for them to do so. If we are not successful in raising additional capital, we may not be able to pay our liabilities and may have to cease operations.

The Company will require significant additional financing in order to advance the Company’s business plan, achieve the milestones and generate revenue to avoid the discontinuation of the Option Agreement, including the following estimated amounts for research, development and commercialization expenses related to the operations. The Company therefore intends to raise an aggregate of $15 million in 2013, and the funding plans include selling additional capital stock and/or borrowing to fund the aforementioned expenses. The Company intends to approach Hedge Funds, Venture Capital Groups, Private Investment Groups and other Institutional Investment Groups in its efforts to achieve future funding.

We have a consulting agreement with AVP under which AVP has agreed to provide us with certain advisory services that include reviewing our business plan, identifying and introducing prospective financial and business partners, and providing general business advice regarding our operations and business strategy. Under the consulting agreement, cash compensation of $600,000 is due to AVP upon our securing $10 million in available cash from funding, and an additional $300,000 is due upon our securing $15 million in available cash from funding (inclusive of the first $10 million). The cash compensation is to be paid to AVP at the rate of $37,500 per month. The total cash compensation to be received by AVP under the consulting agreement is not to exceed $900,000 unless we receive an amount of funding in excess of $15 million. If we receive equity or debt financing that is an amount less than $10 million, in between $10 million and $15 million, or greater than $15 million, the cash compensation earned by the AVP under its consulting services agreement will be prorated. We have the option to make a lump sum payment to AVP in lieu of the monthly cash payments.

If we do not raise additional funds of at least $6.5 million for the advancement of our option agreements by ~~December~~March 115, ~~2014~~2015, we will lose our rights to the options; at least $1 million of these additional funds must be raised before ~~May~~November 1, 2013 for our Greentech Mining Inc. Option Agreement (amended ~~form~~from December 1, 2012), ~~and~~ at least $~~4.75~~750,000 ~~million~~ must be raised before ~~July~~November1, 122013 if we intend to exercise our Mineral Claim Option Agreement with Union Gulf Resources Ltd.(amended from December 1, ~~2014~~2012).

We plan to measure our future liquidity primarily by the cash and working capital available to fund our operations, if we are ever able to raise capital. To date we have not raised any capital and, accordingly; do not have any capital available to fund our operations, as stated above. We will not be able to commercialize operating. We are evaluating various means of raising our initial capital, including through the sale of equity securities, joint venture agreements or other means. We expect to incur losses until as we have a metal product for sale, and we are unable to estimate when, if ever, we will receive revenue or have a positive cash flow.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We do not currently believe we are currently subject to any material interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, or commodity price risk. Our ability to fund operations in the future will be subject to our ability to raise capital, which may be through the sale of equity securities. While we believe the sale of equity securities is unlikely to expose us to any material loss, we may not be able to continue operations if we are unable to agree with a buyer on a future price for our equity securities.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~Our~~We ~~Chief~~conducted ~~Executive~~an ~~Officer~~evaluation, isunder ~~responsible~~the ~~for~~supervision ~~establishing~~ and ~~maintaining~~with ~~“disclosure~~the ~~controls~~participation ~~and~~of ~~procedures”~~management, ~~(as~~including ~~defined~~our inchief ~~the~~executive ~~rules~~officer ~~promulgated~~(our ~~under~~principal ~~the~~executive ~~Securities~~officer ~~Exchange~~principal ~~Act~~financial ofofficer ~~1934,~~and asprinciple ~~amended~~accounting officer), ~~for~~of ~~our~~the ~~company.~~effectiveness ~~Based~~of onthe ~~their~~design ~~evaluation~~and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ~~the~~Rules ~~rules~~13a-15(e) ~~promulgated~~and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), ~~our~~as ~~Chief~~amended) ~~Executive concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective~~ as of ~~September 30, 2012,~~ the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

- 22 -

Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer (our principal executive officer principal financial officer and principle accounting officer) concluded that as of June 30, 2013 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. Our procedures were designed to ensure that the information relating to our company required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management is currently evaluating the current disclosure controls and procedures in place to see where improvements can be made.

The determination that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2013 are a result of:

1. Insufficient segregation of duties due to the limited size of our staff and budget.

2. No independent audit committee oversight of the company's external financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting.

Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our Board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:

1.Our Board of Directors will nominate an audit committee or a financial expert on our Board of Directors in the next fiscal year.

2.We will appoint additional personnel to assist with the preparation of the Company’s financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~PART~~- II23 ~~— OTHER INFORMATION~~-

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not currently party to any material legal proceedings, although from time to time we may be named as a party to lawsuits in the normal course of business.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There are no material changes to our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2012~~2013, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~June~~August 2614, ~~2012~~2013.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013.
31.2		Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013.
32.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

20- 24 -

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 13, 2013
Dated: August 14, 2013
	GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	By:	/s/ Matthew J. Neher
		Matthew J. Neher
		President/ CEO
		President and Chief Executive Officer

21- 25 -

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013.
31.2		Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2012~~2013.
32.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

22- 26 -

Filing Compare · GREENTECH MINING INTERNATIONAL, INC.