UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ~~FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010~~
OR
	FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010
	OR
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission ~~File~~file ~~Number:~~ number 000-53435

~~RENAISSANCE~~ ASPA ~~BIOENERGY~~GOLD ~~INC~~CORP.

(Formerly, ~~ESE~~Renaissance ~~Corp~~BioEnergy Inc.)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

36101 Bob Hope Dr., Suite E5-238

Rancho Mirage, California 92270

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code.)

~~888~~ 760-~~717~~660-~~2221~~4804

(telephone number, including area code)

~~Indicate~~Check ~~by check mark~~ whether the issuer (1) ~~has~~ filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the ~~preceding~~past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ~~has~~is ~~submitted~~a ~~electronically~~large ~~and~~accelerated ~~posted~~filer, onan ~~its~~accelerated ~~corporate Web site~~filer, ifa ~~any~~non-accelerated filer, ~~every~~or ~~Interactive~~a ~~Data~~smaller ~~File~~reporting ~~required~~company. toSee bethe ~~submitted~~definitions ~~and~~of ~~posted~~“large ~~pursuant~~accelerated tofiler, ~~Rule~~“accelerated ~~405~~filer,” ~~of Regulation S~~“non-Taccelerated ~~(SS~~filer,” ~~232.405~~and of“smaller ~~this~~reporting ~~chapter)~~company” ~~during~~in ~~the~~Rule ~~preceding~~12b-2 12of ~~months (or for such shorter period that~~ the ~~registrant~~Exchange ~~was required to submit and post such files)~~Act. ~~YES [X] NO [ ]~~

~~Indicate~~Large ~~by check mark whether the registrant is a large~~ accelerated filer, anAccelerated ~~accelerated~~ filer, ~~a non~~Non-accelerated filer, orSmaller ~~a smaller~~ reporting company~~. See~~ ~~the definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):~~X

~~Large~~Indicate ~~Accelerated~~by ~~Filer~~check [mark ]whether ~~Accelerated~~the ~~Filer~~registrant [is ]a ~~Non-accelerated~~shell ~~Filer~~company [(as ]defined ~~Smaller~~in ~~Reporting~~Rule ~~Company~~12b-2 ~~[X]~~of ~~(Do~~the ~~not~~Exchange ~~check if smaller reporting company~~Act).

~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).~~ YES [ X ] NO [ ]

~~APPLICABLE~~State ~~ONLY~~the TOnumber ~~CORPORATE~~of ~~ISSUERS~~shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 199,138,370 shares of common stock as of January 20, 2011.

~~Indicated the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 254,948,988 as of October 13, 2010.~~1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I.
		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements.		3
ITEM 1	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3
	Financial Statements:
	Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2010 (unaudited) and May 31, 2010	3
		Balance Sheets as of August 31,2010 (unaudited) and May 31, 2010	F-1
	Unaudited Statements of Operations for the three and six month periods ended November 30, 2010 and November 30, 2009 and the period from November 18, 2010 (inception) to November 30, 2010	4
		Unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months periods ended August 31, 2010 and August 310, 2009 and the period from inception	F-2
	Unaudited Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended November 30, 2010 and November 30, 2009 and the period from November 18, 2010 (inception) to November 30, 2010	5
		Unaudited Statements of Cash Flows for the three months periods ended August 31, 2010 and August 310, 2009 and the period from inception	F-3
	Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements	6
		Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements	F-4
ITEM 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		11
ITEM 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		13
ITEM 4	Controls and Procedures	16
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.		13
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	16
PART II.
ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	16
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.		15
ITEM 6	Exhibits	17
Item 6.	Exhibits.		15
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		17
Signatures			16
SIGNATURES		18
Exhibit Index			17

-2-

~~PART~~ITEM I1. – FINANCIAL ~~INFORMATION~~STATEMENTS

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ASPA Gold Corp. fka Renaissance BioEnergy Inc. An Exploration Stage Enterprise) BALANCE SHEETS
		November 30, 2010 (unaudited)	May 31, 2010
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash		$ 1,227	$ 19,408
Deferred expenses, principally deferred compensation		60,132	33,466
Total Current Assets		61,359	52,874

OTHER ASSETS
Deferred compensation		50,000	-
Total Other Assets		50,000	-

TOTAL ASSETS		$ 111,359	$ 52,874
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable		$ 21,772	$ 29,352
Accrued interest payable		5,189	3,142
Accrued officers and directors compensation		-	120,871
Advance from officer/director		11,500	-
Line of credit, related party		2,000	-
Note payable, including $92,945 to officers, net		131,146	95,240
Total Current Liabilities		171,607	248,605

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-	-

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding		-	-
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 3,000,000,000 shares authorized,
283,948,988 and 258,948,888 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		2,840	2,590
Common stock to be issued		1,035,878	-
Additional paid in capital		532,781	283,032
Deficit accumulated prior to exploration stage		(723,240)	(481,353)
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(908,507)	-
	Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	(60,248)	(195,731)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)		$ 111,359	$ 52,874

See accompanying condensed notes to the interim financial statements.

RENAISSANCE BIOENERGY INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
BALANCE SHEETS
					August 31,
					2010		May 31,
					(unaudited)		2010
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash				$	3,373	$	19,408
	Deferred Expenses				21,798		33,466
	Total Current Assets				25,171		52,874
OTHER ASSET - Deposit					-		-
TOTAL ASSETS				$	25,171	$	52,874
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts Payable			$	20,040	$	29,352
	Accrued Interest Payable				6,687		3,142
	Accrued Officers and Directors Compensation				194,871		120,871
	Advance from Officer/Director				6,000		-
	Convertible Notes Payable, including $89,352 to officers, net				125,693		95,240
Total Current Liabilities					353,291		248,605
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES					-		-
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
	Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
		no shares issued and outstanding			-		-
	Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 3,000,000,000 shares
	authorized, 254,948,988 shares issued and outstanding at
	August 31, 2010 and May 31, 2010				2,590		2,590
	Additional Paid in Capital				283,032		283,032
	Deficit accumulated during the development stage				(613,742)		(481,353)
			Total Stockholders’ Equity		(328,120)		(195,731)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY				$	25,171	$	52,874

See the accompanying condensed notes to the interim financial statements.

ASPA Gold Corp. fka Renaissance BioEnergy Inc. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
					November 18, 2010
	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended		(Inception) to
	November 30,		November 30,		November 30,
	2010	2009	2010	2009	2010

REVENUES	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -

OPERATING EXPENSES
Impairment of mineral property costs	1,181,000	-	1,181,000	-	1,181,000
Compensation expense	2,000	-	2,000		2,000
Total Operating Expenses	1,183,000	-	1,183,000	-	1,183,000

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest expense	(2,878)	-	(2,878)		(2,878)
Cancellation of accrued officers' salaries	277,371	-	277,371		277,371
Total Other Income (Expense)	274,493	-	274,493		274,493

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE TAXES	(908,507)	-	(908,507)	-	(908,507)

INCOME TAXES	-	-	-	-	-

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS	(908,507)	-	(908,507)	-	(908,507)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
Loss from operation of discontinued activities
from the period from April 27, 2005 (inception)
to November 18, 2010	(113,042)	(4,791)	(241,887)	(24,008)	-

NET LOSS	$ (1,021,549)	$ (4,791)	$ (1,150,394)	$ (24,008)	$ (908,507)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE,
BASIC AND DILUTED	$ nil	$ nil	$ nil	$ nil

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON STOCK SHARES
OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED	268,379,052	389,948,988	264,041,223	389,948,988
.
See accompanying condensed notes to the interim financial statements

~~F-1~~4

-3-

ASPA Gold Corp.
fka Renaissance BioEnergy Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
	Six Months	Six Months	November 18, 2010
	Ended	Ended	(Inception) to
	November 30,	November 30,	November 30,
	2010	2009	2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net Loss	$ (908,507)	$ (24,008)	$ (908,507)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash			-
provided (used) by operating activities:
Impairment of mining claims and leases	1,181,000	-	1,181,000
Interest paid through issuance of common stock	2,878	-	2,878
Common stock issued for compensation	2,000	-	2,000
Decrease in accounts payable	(773)	-	(773)
Decrease in accrued compensation	(277,371)	-	(277,371)
Net cash used by continuing operating activities	(773)	(24,008)	(773)
Net cash provided (used) by discontinued operating activities	(57,908)	4,126	-
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	(58,681)	(19,882)	(773)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:	-	-	-
Net borrowings on line of credit	2,000	-	2,000
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities	2,000	-	2,000
Net cash provided by discontinued financing	38,500	20,004	-
activities
Net cash provided by financing activities	40,500	20,004	2,000

Change in cash	(18,181)	122	1,227

Cash, beginning of period	19,408	13	-

Cash, end of period	$ 1,227	$ 135	$ 1,227

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$ -	$ -	$ -
Income taxes paid	$ -	$ -	$ -

NON-CASH ACTIVITIES
Common stock issued for future compensation	$ 100,000	$ -	$100,000

RENAISSANCE BIOENERGY INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Statements of Operations
								Period from
				Three Months		Three Months		April 27, 2005
				Ended		Ended		(Inception) to
				August 31,		August 31,		August 31,
				2010		2009		2010
REVENUES			$	-	$	-	$	-
OPERATING EXPENSES
	Legal & accounting			12,630		18,648		142,282
	Financing fees			-		-		35,000
	General & administrative			116,214		569		436,079
		Total Operating Expenses		128,844		19,217		613,361
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
	Forgiveness of debt			-		-		7,000
	Interest expense			(3,545)		-		(7,381)
		Total Other Income (Expense)		(3,545)		-		(381)
NET LOSS FROM OPERATIONS				(132,389)		(19,217)		(613,742)
LOSS BEFORE TAXES				(132,389)		(19,217)		(613,742)
INCOME TAXES				-		-		-
NET LOSS			$	(132,389)	$	(19,217)	$	(613,742)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE,
BASIC AND DILUTED			$	nil	$	nil
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON STOCK SHARES OUTSTANDING,
OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED				258,948,988		389,948,988

See accompanying condensed notes to the interim financial statements.

~~See the accompanying condensed notes to the interim financial statements.~~5

~~F-2~~ASPA Gold Corp

~~-4-~~fka Renaissance BioEnergy Inc.

RENAISSANCE BIOENERGY INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
								Period from
								April 27, 2005
				Period Ended		Period Ended		(Inception) to
				August 31,		August 31,		August 31,
				2010		2009		2010
				(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss			$	(132,389)	$	(19,217)	$	(613,742)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation				-		-		9,546
Non cash compensation and services related to
stock issuances				-		-		23,146
Non cash debt issuance expenses				17,121				17,121
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable				(9,311)		3,680		20,042
Increase in accrued compensation and interest				77,544		-		201,557
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities				(47,035)		(15,537)		(342,330)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of fixed assets				-		-		(9,547)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities				-		-		(9,547
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Proceeds from convertible debt and officer loans			31,000		-		126,000
	Proceeds from sales of common stock			-		-		105,258
	Contribution of capital			-		15,698		123,993
Net cash provided by financing activities				31,000		15,698		355,251
Change in cash				(16,035)		161		3,373
Cash, beginning of period				19,408		13		-
Cash, end of period			$	3,373	$	174	$	3,373
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
		Interest paid	$	-	$	-	$	3,836
		Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-	$	-

(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)

~~See~~Condensed ~~accompanying~~Notes ~~condensed notes~~ to ~~the~~Unaudited ~~interim~~Interim ~~financial~~Financial ~~statements.~~Statements

~~F-3~~NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

~~-5-~~ASPA Gold Corp. (the "Company") was incorporated as ESE Corp. on April 27, 2005 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company was originally organized to lease, purchase or construct retail locations for the purpose of selling coffee and related products. In December 2009, the Company adopted a different business plan that involved the acquisition of facilities for the purpose of processing selected liquid waste products into ethanol. Effective January 6, 2010, the Company changed its name from ESE Corp. to Renaissance BioEnergy Inc. In November 2010, Renaissance BioEnergy Inc changed its name to ASPA Gold Corp. and its business plan to gold exploration and development.

~~RENAISSANCE~~The ~~BIOENERGY~~Company ~~INC~~is an exploration stage company and is concentrating substantially all of its efforts in acquiring interests in mining claims and leases for the Oatman Gold Project, located in Mohave County in the state of Arizona, and implementing its business plan to explore and develop its mining claims.

(AThe ~~Development~~foregoing ~~Stage~~unaudited ~~Enterprise~~interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10K for the year ended May 31, 2010, which was filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented. Operating results for the six-month period ended November 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending May 31, 2011.

~~CONDENSED~~The ~~NOTES~~preparation TOof ~~INTERIM~~financial ~~FINANCIAL~~statements ~~STATEMENTS~~in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

~~AUGUST~~NOTE ~~31,~~2 ~~2010~~- ~~AND~~SUMMARY ~~2009~~OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~NOTE~~This 1summary –of ~~ORGANIZATION~~significant ~~AND~~accounting ~~BASIS~~policies OFof ~~PRESENTATION~~ASPA Gold Corp. is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

~~Renaissance~~Accounting Bioenergy, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated as ESE Corp. on April 27, 2005 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company was originally organized to lease, purchase or construct retail locations for the purpose of selling coffee and related products. In December 2009, the principal shareholders sold their shares to an unrelated entity and the Company, under its new management, has adopted a new business plan that involves the acquisition of facilities for the purpose of processing selected liquid waste products into ethanol.Method

~~Effective~~The ~~January~~Company’s 6,financial ~~2010,~~statements are prepared using the ~~Company~~accrual ~~changed~~basis ~~its~~of ~~name~~accounting ~~from~~in ~~ESE~~accordance ~~Corp.~~with toaccounting ~~Renaissance~~principles ~~BioEnergy~~generally ~~Inc~~accepted in the United States of America.

~~The Company is a development stage company and is concentrating substantially all of its efforts in raising capital and implementing its business plan.~~6

~~The~~Cash ~~foregoing unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information~~ and ~~with~~Cash the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10K for the year ended May 31, 2010, which was filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period presented. Operating results for the three month period ended August 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending May 31, 2011.Equivalents

~~The~~For ~~preparation~~purposes of ~~financial~~its ~~statements~~statement ~~in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States~~ of ~~America~~cash ~~requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities~~flows, ~~disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of~~ the ~~date~~Company ~~the~~considers ~~financial~~all ~~statements~~short-term ~~are~~debt ~~published,~~securities ~~and~~purchased ~~the~~with ~~reported~~maturity ~~amounts~~ of ~~revenues~~three ~~and~~months ~~expenses~~or ~~during~~less ~~the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect~~ to ~~such~~be ~~estimates~~cash and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s financial position and results of operationsequivalents.

~~NOTE~~Derivative ~~2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES~~Instruments

~~This~~ASC ~~summary~~815-24 of(formerly ~~significant~~SFAS ~~accounting policies of Renaissance BioEnergy Inc~~No. ~~is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management~~133), ~~which~~“Accounting ~~is responsible~~ for ~~their~~Derivative ~~integrity~~Instruments and ~~objectivity. These~~Hedging ~~accounting~~Activities”, requires ~~policies~~all ~~conform~~derivatives to ~~accounting~~be ~~principles~~recorded ~~generally~~as ~~accepted~~either inassets ~~the~~or ~~United~~liabilities ~~States of America,~~ and ~~have~~measured ~~been~~at ~~consistently~~fair ~~applied in the preparation of the financial statements~~value.

~~F-4~~If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change.

~~-6-~~At November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company has not engaged in any transactions that would be considered derivative instruments or hedging activities.

~~RENAISSANCE~~Development ~~BIOENERGY~~and ~~INC.~~Exploration Stage Activities

(AThe ~~Development~~Company ~~Stage~~has ~~Enterprise)~~been in various development stages from its formation through November 18, 2010. It was formerly engaged in establishing retail locations for the purpose of selling coffee and related products at drive-through establishments in North Carolina. No locations were ever completed and no revenue from retail locations was realized. Subsequently, the Company sought to raise capital for the purpose of acquiring or constructing a facility to process liquid waste into ethanol. The plant was not acquired and the required funds to construct a plant could not be raised.

~~CONDENSED~~Beginning ~~NOTES~~November TO18, ~~INTERIM~~2010, ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~Company entered an exploration stage when the Company decided to change its focus of operations and acquired interests in certain mining claims, as well as a mining and mineral lease of certain patented mining claims, which are referred to as “the Oatman Gold Project” located in Mohave County, Arizona. The Company intends to develop the claims and will seek to extract precious metals, should they exist, based upon future exploration activities.

~~AUGUST~~Fair ~~31,~~Value ~~2010~~of ~~AND~~Financial ~~2009~~Instruments

The Company's financial instruments as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting ~~Method~~Standards Board ("FASB") ASC 825-10-50, include cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses. All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at November 30, 2010.

~~The~~FASB ~~Company’s~~ASC ~~financial~~820, ~~statements~~defines ~~are~~fair ~~prepared~~value, ~~using~~establishes ~~the~~a ~~accrual~~framework ~~basis~~for ofmeasuring ~~accounting~~fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ~~generally~~and ~~accepted~~expands indisclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the ~~United~~inputs ~~States~~used ofin ~~America.~~measuring fair value as follows:

~~Cash~~Level ~~and~~1. Observable ~~Cash~~inputs ~~Equivalents~~such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. The Company has no Level 1 assets or liabilities; and

~~For~~Level ~~purposes~~2. ofInputs ~~its~~from ~~statement~~other ofthan ~~cash~~quoted ~~flows,~~prices ~~the~~in ~~Company~~active ~~considers~~markets, ~~all~~that ~~short-term~~are ~~debt~~observable ~~securities~~either ~~purchased~~directly ~~with~~or aindirectly. ~~maturity~~The ofCompany ~~three~~has ~~months~~no orLevel ~~less~~2 toassets beor ~~cash~~liabilities; ~~equivalents.~~and

~~Derivative Instruments~~7

~~ASC~~Level ~~815-24~~3. Unobservable ~~(formerly~~inputs ~~SFAS~~in ~~No.~~which ~~133),~~there ~~“Accounting~~is ~~for~~little ~~Derivative~~of ~~Instruments~~no ~~and~~market ~~Hedging Activities”~~data, ~~requires~~which ~~all~~require ~~derivatives~~the reporting entity to bedevelop ~~recorded~~its asown ~~either~~assumptions. The Company’s Level 3 assets orconsist ~~liabilities~~of ~~and~~securities ~~measured~~in atprivately ~~fair~~held ~~value~~companies. The Company has no Level 3 liabilities.

IfThe ~~certain~~Company ~~conditions~~does ~~are~~not ~~met,~~have aany ~~derivative~~assets ~~may~~or beliabilities ~~specifically~~measured ~~designated~~at asfair avalue ~~hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition~~ on ~~the~~a ~~hedging~~recurring ~~derivative~~basis ~~with~~at ~~the~~November ~~recognition~~30, of2010. The ~~(i)~~Company ~~the~~did ~~changes~~not inhave ~~the~~any fair value ofadjustments ~~the~~for ~~hedged~~assets ~~asset~~and orliabilities ~~liability~~measured ~~that~~at ~~are~~fair ~~attributable~~value toon ~~the~~a ~~hedged~~nonrecurring ~~risk~~basis orduring ~~(ii)~~ the ~~earnings~~period ~~effect~~ended ofNovember ~~the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument~~30, ~~the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change~~2010.

AtIncome ~~August 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company has not engaged in any transactions that would be considered derivative instruments or hedging activities.~~Taxes

~~Development~~Income ~~Stage~~taxes ~~Activities~~are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC 740-10-25 Income Taxes-Recognition. Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by ASC 740-10-25-5 to allow recognition of such an asset.

~~The~~At ~~Company~~November ~~has~~30, ~~been~~2010 inand ~~the~~May ~~development~~31, ~~stage~~2010, ~~since~~the ~~its~~Company ~~formation. It~~had ~~was~~net ~~formerly~~deferred ~~engaged~~tax inassets ~~establishing~~calculated ~~retail~~at ~~locations~~an ~~for~~expected ~~the~~rate ~~purpose~~of 34% of ~~selling~~approximately ~~coffee~~$554,000 and ~~related~~$163,600, ~~products~~respectively, atprincipally ~~drive-through~~arising ~~establishments~~from innet ~~North~~operating ~~Carolina~~loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. NoAs ~~locations~~management ~~were~~of ~~ever~~the ~~completed~~Company ~~and~~cannot nodetermine ~~revenue~~that ~~from~~it ~~retail~~is ~~locations~~more ~~was~~likely ~~realized. Currently,~~than not that the Company iswill ~~seeking~~realize tothe ~~raise~~benefit ~~capital~~of ~~for~~ the ~~purpose~~net ofdeferred ~~acquiring~~tax orasset, ~~constructing~~ a ~~plant~~valuation allowance equal to ~~process~~the ~~liquid~~net ~~waste~~deferred ~~into~~tax ~~ethanol~~asset has been established at November 30, 2010 and May 31, 2010. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at November 30, 2010 and May 31, 2010 were as follows:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

	November 30, 2010	May 31, 2010

Net operating loss carry forward	$__1,631,000	$ 481,353_

Deferred tax asset	$_554,000	$ 163,600_
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance	$(554,000)	$ (163,600)

~~The~~At ~~Company’s~~November ~~financial~~30, ~~instruments~~2010 asand ~~defined~~May by31, ~~Statement~~2010, ofthe ~~Financial~~Company ~~Accounting~~has ~~Standards~~estimated ~~Board~~net ~~(“FASB”)~~operating ~~ASC~~loss ~~825~~carry-~~10-50~~ forwards of approximately $1,631,000 ~~include~~and ~~cash~~$481,300, ~~receivables~~respectively, ~~accounts~~which ~~payable~~expire ~~and~~in ~~accrued~~the ~~expenses~~years 2026-2030. ~~All~~The ~~instruments~~approximate ~~are~~net ~~accounted~~change ~~for~~in onvaluation aallowance ~~historical~~between ~~cost~~May ~~basis~~31, ~~which,~~2010 ~~due~~and toNovember ~~the short maturity of these financial instruments~~30, ~~approximates~~2010 ~~fair~~is ~~value at August 31~~$390, ~~2010~~400.

~~FASB~~The ~~ASC~~Company ~~820,~~has ~~defines~~not ~~fair~~yet ~~value~~determined what portion, ~~establishes~~if aany, ~~framework~~of the net operating losses available for ~~measuring~~carryforward, ~~fair~~amounting ~~value~~to inapproximately ~~accordance~~$158,000 ~~with~~at ~~generally~~November ~~accepted~~30, ~~accounting~~2009 ~~principles~~that could be lost due to the December 2009 change in control and ~~expands~~the ~~disclosures~~operating ~~about~~losses ~~fair~~available ~~value~~for carryforward, amounting to approximately $290,000 at November 30, 2010 that could be lost due to the November 2010 change in control.

~~measurements. FASB~~Net ~~ASC~~Loss ~~820~~Per ~~establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:~~Share

~~Level~~The 1Company has adopted ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which provides for calculation of "basic" and "diluted" earnings per share. ~~Observable~~Basic ~~inputs~~earnings ~~such~~per asshare ~~quoted~~includes ~~prices~~no indilution ~~active~~and ~~markets~~is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for ~~identical~~the ~~assets~~period. Diluted orearnings ~~liabilities~~per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that ~~are~~could ~~accessible~~share atin the ~~measurement~~earnings ~~date.~~of ~~The~~an ~~Company~~entity ~~has~~similar noto ~~Level~~fully 1diluted ~~assets~~earnings orper ~~liabilities;~~share. Basic and diluted losses per share were the same, at the reporting dates, as there were no common stock equivalents outstanding.

~~Level 2. Inputs from other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly. The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities; and~~8

~~F-5~~Reclassifications

~~-7-~~Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. This reclassification has resulted in no changes to the Company's accumulated deficit or net losses presented.

~~RENAISSANCE~~Use ~~BIOENERGY~~of ~~INC.~~Estimates

(AThe ~~Development~~process ~~Stage~~of ~~Enterprise)~~preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

~~CONDENSED~~Going ~~NOTES TO INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~Concern

~~AUGUST~~As 31shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss for the period ending November 30, 2010, ~~AND~~has ~~2009~~no revenues, and has an accumulated deficit of approximately $1,631,000 since the inception of the Company. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence. The Company has obtained a $1,000,000 unsecured working capital credit line from a related company, North American Gold & Minerals Fund, and will seek additional capital from new equity securities offerings that, if successful, will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan. However, there are inherent uncertainties and management cannot provide assurances that it will be successful in its endeavors, as the timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors. Furthermore, there are no assurances that funds will be available to the Company from the aforementioned credit line inasmuch as the published financial statements of North American Gold & Minerals Fund do not reflect assets of sufficient quantity to meet the working capital needs of the Company.

~~Level~~Mineral 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little of no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company’s Level 3 assets consist of securities in privately held companies; the Company has no Level 3 liabilities.Properties

~~The~~Under ~~Company~~US ~~does~~GAAP ~~not~~mineral ~~have~~property ~~any~~acquisition ~~assets~~costs orare ~~liabilities~~ordinarily ~~measured~~capitalized atwhen ~~fair~~incurred ~~value~~using onFASB aASC ~~recurring~~Topic ~~basis~~805-20-55-37, atWhether ~~August~~Mineral ~~31,~~Rights ~~2010~~are Tangible or Intangible Assets. The ~~Company~~carrying ~~did~~costs ~~not~~are ~~have~~assessed ~~any~~for ~~fair~~impairment ~~value~~under ~~adjustments~~ASC Topic 360-36-10-35-20, Accounting for ~~assets~~Impairment ~~and~~or ~~liabilities~~Disposal ~~measured~~of atLong-Lived ~~fair~~Assets ~~value~~whenever onevents aor ~~nonrecurring~~changes ~~basis~~in ~~during~~circumstances indicate that the ~~period~~carrying ~~ended~~costs ~~August~~may ~~31,~~not ~~2010~~be recoverable.

~~Income~~The ~~Taxes~~Company also evaluates the carrying value of acquired mineral property rights in accordance with ASC Topic 930-360-35-1, Mining Assets: Impairment and Business Combinations, using the Value Beyond Proven and Probable (VBPP) method. The fair value of a mining asset generally includes both VBPP and an estimate of the future market price of the minerals.

~~Income~~When ~~taxes~~the ~~are~~Company ~~provided~~has ~~based~~capitalized ~~upon~~mineral ~~the~~property ~~liability~~costs, ~~method~~these ofproperties ~~accounting~~will ~~pursuant~~be toperiodically ~~ASC~~assessed ~~740-10-25~~for ~~Income~~impairment ~~Taxes-Recognition~~of value. ~~Under~~ ~~this~~Once ~~approach,~~a ~~deferred~~property ~~income~~reaches ~~taxes~~the ~~are~~production ~~recorded~~stage, ~~to reflect~~ the ~~tax~~related ~~consequences~~capitalized incosts ~~future~~will ~~years~~be ofamortized, ~~differences~~using ~~between~~ the ~~tax~~units ~~basis~~ of ~~assets~~production ~~and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end~~method. A Additionally ~~valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe~~ the Company ~~has~~expenses ~~met~~as ~~the~~incurred ~~“more~~all ~~likely~~maintenance ~~than~~and ~~not”~~exploration ~~standard~~property ~~imposed by ASC 740-10-25-5 to allow recognition of such an asset~~costs.

AtSince ~~August 31, 2010 and May 31, 2010,~~ the Company ~~had~~is ~~net~~unable ~~deferred~~to ~~tax~~support ~~assets~~continued ~~calculated~~capitalization ~~at an expected rate~~ of ~~34%~~acquisition ~~of approximately $208~~costs,~~700~~ ~~and $163,600, respectively, principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management of~~ the Company ~~cannot~~has ~~determine~~recognized ~~that~~impairment itcharges ~~is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit~~ of ~~the net deferred tax asset~~$1, ~~a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset has been established at August 31~~181,000 ~~2010~~for ~~and May 31, 2010. The significant components of~~ the ~~deferred~~period ~~tax~~ended ~~asset~~November ~~at August 31~~30, 2010 ~~and May 31, 2010 were as follows:~~.

		August 31, 2010		May 31, 2010
Net operating loss carryforward	$	613,742	$	481,353
Deferred tax asset	$	208,700	$	163,600
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance	$	(208,700)	$	(163,600)

NOTE 3-CHANGE OF CONTROL AND BUSINESS

AtOn ~~August~~December 316, ~~2010~~2009, ~~and~~the ~~May~~two ~~31,~~individuals ~~2010,~~who ~~the~~controlled ~~Company~~30,000,000 ~~has~~pre-split ~~estimated~~(360,000,000 ~~net~~post-split) ~~operating~~shares, ~~loss~~representing ~~carryforwards~~approximately 92% of ~~approximately~~the ~~$613,700~~then issued and ~~$481,300,~~outstanding ~~respectively,~~shares ~~which~~of ~~expire~~the inCompany's ~~the~~common ~~years~~stock, ~~2025~~sold such shares to ~~2030~~an unrelated entity. ~~The~~On ~~approximate~~January ~~net~~5, ~~change~~2010, inthe ~~valuation~~new ~~allowance~~principal ~~between~~shareholder ~~May~~retired 3125,000,000 ~~2010~~pre-split ~~and August 31~~(300,000,000 ~~2010~~post-split) ~~is $45,100~~shares.

The Company has not yet determined what portion, if any, of the net operating losses available for carryforward, amounting to approximately $158,200 at November 30, 2009, that could be lost due to the December 2009 change in control.9

~~Net~~During ~~Loss~~November ~~Per~~2010, ~~Share~~the Company entered into four separate transactions, wherein it acquired undivided interests in mining claims and leases included in the Oatman Gold Project from a number of different sellers. As a result of these four transactions, a total of 118,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to the sellers who, subsequent to November 30, 2010, transferred these shares to North American Gold & Minerals Fund. In connection with these acquisitions, North American Gold & Minerals Fund has entered into restricted stock agreements wherein it has agreed that, until November 30, 2012, it would not sell, alienate, pledge, assign, transfer, convey or in any way encumber its shares of the Company’s common stock. From December 1, 2012 until November 30, 2014, North American Gold & Minerals Fund has agreed to limit sales of the Company’s common stock to no more than 2,000,000 shares during any consecutive period of 90 days. Our new business plan involves gold exploration, development and mining.

~~The~~Following ~~Company~~the ~~has~~change ~~adopted~~in ~~ASC~~business ~~260~~focus, Earnings Per Share, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the ~~weighted~~Company’s ~~average~~financial ~~common~~statements ~~shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share~~ reflect ~~the~~discontinued ~~potential~~operations ~~dilution~~for ~~of securities that could share in~~ the ~~earnings~~business ofexpenses anincurred ~~entity~~prior ~~similar~~ to ~~fully~~November ~~diluted earnings per share. Basic and diluted losses per share were the same~~18, ~~at the reporting dates, as there were no common stock equivalents outstanding~~2010.

~~F-6~~NOTE 4 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

~~-8-~~On February 1, 2010, we borrowed $50,000 from our principal officer/director, which was due and payable January 1, 2012, together with accrued interest of 12% per year. On February 25, 2010, we borrowed an additional $15,000 from our principal officer/director, which was due April 25, 2010, together with accrued interest of 30% per year. At the option of the Company, both notes were convertible into common stock at $0.02 per share, in whole or in part. During April and May, 2010, the officer/director advanced an additional $10,000 to the Company for working capital for a total indebtedness amounting to $75,000. On May 25, 2010, we exchanged the aforementioned indebtedness for a note payable to the officer/director in the amount of $88,635. The principal balance of the new note is comprised of the sum of the aforementioned notes and cash advances ($75,000), original issue discount ($7,500) and, unspecified loan fees and costs incurred by the lender ($6,135).

~~RENAISSANCE~~On ~~BIOENERGY~~May ~~INC~~25, 2010, we issued a note to another officer in exchange for cash of $10,000. On May 26, 2010, we issued a note to an unrelated individual in exchange for additional cash of $10,000, and on June 1, 2010, we issued a note to another unrelated individual in exchange for cash of $25,000. The principal balances of each of the $10,000 notes are $11,818, which includes, in addition to the aforementioned cash advances, original issue discount of $1,000 and unspecified loan fees and costs incurred by the lender of $818. The principal balance of the $25,000 note is $29,545, which includes original issue discount ($2,500) and, unspecified loan fees and costs incurred by the lender ($2,045).

(Under their original terms, the above notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due, together with accrued interest, on May 30, 2011, unless paid earlier at the option of the Company, but not without giving prior notice to the lender. At the option of the lender, the notes were convertible into common stock of the Company, at the rate of $0.02 per share, in whole or in part, at any time prior to their repayment. A ~~Development~~summary ~~Stage~~of ~~Enterprise)~~these notes, less related discounts are shown below:

CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Less: Unamortized OID and Fees
Lender	Face Amount of Note	Less: Unamortized OID and Fees	Net
Officer/director	$ 88,635	$ 6,623	$ 82,012
Officer	11,818	885	10,933
Investor	11,818	890	10,928
Investor	29,545	2,272	27,273
Total	$ 141,816	$ 10,670	$ 131,146

~~AUGUST 31, 2010 AND 2009~~10

~~Reclassifications~~Effective November 30, 2010, the note holders entered into amendments with the Company under which the notes are no longer convertible into common stock at a price of $0.02 per share. Rather, the conversion price will be the same price as the Company may sell common stock in its first capital raise of at least $5,000,000 before the maturity of the notes. In addition, the interest rate of these notes was reduced to 3% effective from the inception of the notes. The two investor note holders holding $41,363 in face amount of the notes, who are not affiliates of the Company, were compensated for amending their notes through the issuance of a total of 689,382 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $2,878, which is the value of the interest forgone in the reducing the interest rates of the notes.

~~Certain~~On ~~amounts~~November ~~from~~30, ~~prior~~2010, ~~periods~~four ~~have~~of ~~been~~the ~~reclassified~~Company’s toofficers ~~conform~~and todirectors ~~the~~cancelled ~~current~~a ~~period~~total ~~presentation. This~~of ~~reclassification~~$277,371 ~~has~~of ~~resulted~~accrued incompensation noowed ~~changes~~ to them. As a result, the ~~Company’s~~accrued ~~accumulated~~compensation ~~deficit~~obligations orof ~~net~~the ~~losses~~Company ~~presented~~were eliminated.

~~Use~~On November 29, 2010, the Company entered into a 2-year employment and service agreement with Ronald Yadin Lowenthal, its new President and CEO. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Lowenthal received, in lieu of ~~Estimates~~his base compensation of $50,000 per year ($100,000 in total), 300,000 shares of our restricted common stock. In addition, Mr. Lowenthal received 200,000 shares of restricted common stock as a "signing bonus", valued by the board of directors at $2,000. The total amount, $102,000, for the 500,000 shares issued will be amortized over the 2-year period of his employment agreement, commencing December 1, 2010.

~~The~~NOTE ~~process~~5 of– ~~preparing~~CANCELLATION ~~financial~~OF ~~statements~~ACCRUED inCOMPENSATION ~~conformity~~AND with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

~~Going~~ EMPLOYMENT ~~Concern~~AGREEMENT

AsNOTE shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss for the period ending August 31, 2010, has no revenues, and has an accumulated deficit of $613,742 since the inception of the Company. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence. The Company anticipates it will require an estimated $6~~,000,000~~– toCAPITAL acquire or build a processing facility, continue operations and increase development through the next fiscal year. Management is seeking additional capital from new equity securities offerings that, if successful, will provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business plan. However, there are inherent uncertainties and management cannot provide assurances that it will be successful in its endeavors, as the timing and amount of capital requirements will depend on a number of factors.STOCK

~~NOTE~~Preferred ~~3 - DEFERRED EXPENSES~~Stock

~~Deferred~~We ~~expenses~~are ~~consists~~authorized ofto ~~the~~issue ~~unamortized~~100,000,000 ~~value~~shares of ~~common~~preferred stock ~~issued~~with toa ~~consultants~~par ~~for~~value ~~future~~of ~~services,~~$0.00001. As ~~amortized~~of ~~over~~November ~~one~~30, ~~year~~2010, ~~from~~we ~~February~~have ~~2010. An~~not ~~analysis~~issued ofany ~~deferred~~preferred ~~expenses follows:~~stock.

	Amount				Unamortized
	Deferred		Amortized		Balance
Consultants	$	46,666	$	24,868	$	21,798

Common Stock

~~NOTE~~On 4December –14, ~~CONVERTIBLE~~2009, ~~NOTES~~we ~~PAYABLE~~amended our Articles of Incorporation and increased our authorized shares from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value per share.

On ~~February~~January 119, 2010, we ~~borrowed~~authorized ~~$50,000~~a ~~from~~12 ~~our~~for ~~principal~~1 ~~officer/director~~forward ~~which~~split ~~was~~of ~~due~~our ~~and~~common ~~payable January 1~~stock, ~~2012,~~which ~~together~~became ~~with~~effective ~~accrued~~March ~~interest~~9, ~~of 12% per year~~2010. The Onstock ~~February~~split ~~25,~~was ~~2010,~~accomplished weby ~~borrowed~~issuing an additional ~~$15,000~~shares ~~from~~to ~~our~~existing ~~principal~~shareholders ~~officer/director~~and ~~which~~adjusting ~~was~~the ~~due~~common ~~April~~stock ~~25,~~accounts ~~2010~~for ~~together~~the ~~with~~par ~~accrued~~value ~~interest~~ of ~~30%~~the ~~per~~additional ~~year~~shares issued. AtAuthorized ~~the~~shares ~~option~~ of ~~the Company, both notes were convertible into common stock at~~ $0.0200001 ~~per~~par ~~share,~~value incommon ~~whole~~stock orincreased infrom ~~part. During April and May~~250, ~~2010~~000,000 ~~the~~to ~~officer/director advanced an additional $10~~3,000,000,000 toshares; ~~the~~issued ~~Company~~and ~~for~~outstanding ~~working~~shares ~~capital~~on ~~for~~the aeffective ~~total~~date ~~indebtedness~~increased ~~amounting~~from 21,245,753 to ~~$75~~254,~~000~~948,988 shares.

OnCommon ~~May~~stock ~~25,~~to ~~2010,~~be weissued ~~exchanged~~consists ~~the~~of ~~two aforementioned notes and~~94,289,382 ~~combined~~shares ~~with~~of ~~the~~common ~~May~~stock ~~2010~~under ~~cash~~agreements ~~advances,~~executed ~~replaced~~and ~~them~~approved ~~with~~prior ~~a note payable~~ to ~~the~~November ~~officer/director for $88~~30,~~635. The~~ ~~principal~~2010 ~~balance~~by of the ~~new~~Company's ~~note~~board ~~is comprised~~ of ~~the sum of the aforementioned cash advances ($75~~directors,~~000),~~ ~~original~~but ~~issue~~not ~~discount ($7,500) and, unspecified loan fees and costs incurred by the lender ($6,135).~~

Fyet issued to: (1) Acquire additional mining claims within the Oatman Gold Project, 93,100,000 shares, (2) modify convertible notes payable to non-7affiliated investors, 689,382 shares and (3) our new Chief Executive Officer, Ronald Y. Lowenthal, 500,000 shares.

All shares have equal voting rights, are non-9-assessable and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.

~~RENAISSANCE~~The ~~BIOENERGY~~accompanying ~~INC~~financial statements give retroactive effect to the aforementioned name change and stock split for all periods presented.

~~(A Development Stage Enterprise)~~11

~~CONDENSED~~NOTE ~~NOTES~~7 TO– ~~INTERIM~~MINING ~~FINANCIAL~~CLAIM ~~STATEMENTS~~ACQUISITION AGREEMENTS; MINING AND MINERAL LEASE

~~AUGUST~~On 31November 18, 2010, ~~AND~~November ~~2009~~22, 2010, and November 26, 2010, the Company entered into three separate agreements with different sellers, under which the company acquired a 100% interest in 15 unpatented lode mining claims, and a 62.5% interest in 22 unpatented placer mining claims, located in Oatman, Mohave County, Arizona. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company issued a total of 84,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to various sellers. The agreements require that the Company make minimum work expenditures of $100,000 per contract year. The mining claims have been valued at the fair market value, $840,000 ($0.01 per share).

On ~~May~~November 2530, 2010, wethe ~~issued~~Company aentered ~~note~~into toa ~~another~~mining ~~officer~~and inmineral ~~exchange~~lease ~~for cash~~ of ~~$10,000,~~7 ~~and~~patented onlode ~~May~~claims ~~26,~~known ~~2010~~as wethe ~~issued~~Lexington aclaim ~~note~~group toin anOatman, ~~individual~~Arizona. The inlease ~~exchange~~has ~~for~~an ~~additional~~initial ~~cash~~term of ~~$10,000,~~3 years and onthe ~~June~~Company 1,may ~~2010~~renew wethe ~~issued~~lease afor ~~note~~up to an3 ~~individual~~additional interms ~~exchange~~of ~~for~~3 ~~cash~~years ~~of $25~~each,~~000. The~~ ~~principal~~for ~~balances~~a oftotal ~~each~~lease term of ~~the~~up ~~$10,000~~to ~~notes~~12 ~~are~~years. The ~~$11,818,~~Company ~~which~~issued ~~includes~~34,100,000 inshares ~~addition~~of tocommon ~~the aforementioned cash advances~~stock, ~~original~~the ~~issue~~expense ~~discount~~for ofwhich ~~$1,000~~is ~~and~~being ~~unspecified~~amortized ~~loan~~over ~~fees~~the ~~and~~initial ~~costs~~3-year ~~incurred~~term byof the ~~lender~~lease, ofand ~~$818. The~~agreed ~~principal~~to ~~balance~~pay ofminimum ~~the~~royalties of $25200,000 ~~note~~per isyear ~~$29,545~~during ~~which~~the ~~includes~~term ~~original~~of ~~issue~~the ~~discount~~lease. The ~~($2,500)~~leasehold ~~and,~~interests ~~unspecified~~have ~~loan~~been ~~fees~~valued ~~and~~the ~~costs~~fair ~~incurred~~market byvalue, ~~the~~$341,000 ~~lender~~ ($~~2,045~~0.01 per share).

~~The~~Costs ~~above~~of ~~notes~~acquiring ~~bear~~mineral ~~interest~~properties atare ~~10%~~capitalized ~~per~~by ~~annum~~project ~~and~~area ~~are~~upon ~~due,~~purchases ~~together~~of ~~with~~the ~~accrued~~associated ~~interest,~~claims. onWhen ~~May~~costs ~~30,~~are ~~2011~~capitalized, ~~unless~~mineral ~~paid~~properties ~~earlier~~are atperiodically ~~the~~assessed ~~option~~for ofimpairment. Cost ~~the~~to ~~Company,~~maintain ~~but~~the ~~not~~mineral ~~without~~rights ~~giving~~and ~~prior~~leases ~~notice~~are toexpensed ~~the~~as ~~lender~~incurred. At ~~the~~When ~~option~~a ofproperty ~~the~~reaches ~~lender,~~ the ~~notes~~production ~~are~~station ~~convertible~~stage, ~~into~~any ~~common~~related ~~stock~~capitalized ofcost ~~the~~will ~~Company~~be amortized, atusing the ~~rate~~units of ~~$0.02~~production ~~per~~method ~~share,~~on inthe ~~whole~~basis orof inperiodic ~~part,~~estimates atof ~~any~~ore ~~time prior to their repayment~~reserves. A ~~summary of these notes, less related discounts are shown below:~~

			Less: Unamortized OID
Lender	Face Amount of Note		and Fees		Net
Officer/director	$	88,635	$	10,032	$	78,603
Officer		11,818		1,339		10,479
Investor		11,818		1,344		10,474
Investor		29,545		3,409		26,136
Total	$	141,816	$	16,124	$	125,692

Since the Company is unable to support continued capitalization of acquisition costs, the Company has recognized impairment charges of $1,181,000.

NOTE 58 – ~~CAPITAL~~UNSECURED ~~STOCK~~LINE OF CREDIT

~~Preferred~~On ~~Stock~~November 29, 2010, the Company entered into a 1 year unsecured line of credit with a related party, North American Gold & Minerals Fund, pursuant to which the Company can borrow up to $1,000,000 on a revolving basis. The line of credit is non-interest bearing for the first-year, thereafter interest accrues at 3% per annum. At November 30, 2010, a total of $2,000 was outstanding under this line of credit. Based on published financial statements, there are no assurances that additional funds will be available to the Company from the aforementioned line of credit when required by the Company.

WeMr. ~~are~~Ronald ~~authorized~~Y. toLowenthal ~~issue~~became ~~100~~our Chief Executive Officer and President and a member of our Board of Directors effective November 29,~~000~~ 2010. Mr. Lowenthal is also the Chief Executive Officer and director of North American Gold & Minerals Fund,~~000~~ ~~shares~~a company that is process of ~~preferred~~acquiring a majority interest in our common stock ~~with~~and ato ~~par~~whom ~~value~~we are obligated under a line of $0credit agreement.~~00001. As~~ In ofconnection ~~May~~with 31these acquisitions, ~~2010~~North American Gold & Minerals Fund has entered into restricted stock agreements wherein it has agreed that, weuntil ~~have~~November 30, 2012, it would not ~~issued~~sell, alienate, pledge, assign, transfer, convey or in any ~~preferred~~way encumber its shares of the Company’s common stock. From December 1, 2012 until November 30, 2014, North American Gold & Minerals Fund has agreed to limit sales of the Company’s common stock to no more than 2,000,000 shares during any consecutive period of 90 days.

~~Common~~NOTE ~~Stock~~9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On December 148, ~~2009~~2010, wethe ~~amended~~Company ~~our~~entered ~~Articles~~into ofan ~~Incorporation~~agreement ~~and~~to ~~increased~~acquire ~~our~~the ~~authorized~~remaining ~~shares~~interest ~~from~~that ~~100~~it did not already own in the Oatman Gold Project,~~000,000~~ tospecifically ~~250~~a 37.5% undivided interest in 22 unpatented placer mining claims. The Company issued a total of 24,~~000~~400,000 shares ofto ~~common~~the ~~stock~~sellers in this transaction, valued at $244,000 ($0.~~00001~~01 ~~par value~~ per share).

~~On January 19, 2010, we authorized a~~ 12 for 1 forward split of our common stock, which became effective March 9, 2010. The stock split was accomplished by issuing additional shares to existing shareholders and adjusting the common stock accounts for the par value of the additional shares issued. Authorized shares of $0.00001 par value common stock increased from 250,000,000 to 3,000,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding shares on the effective date increased from 21,245,753 to 254,948,988 shares.

~~All~~On ~~shares~~December ~~have~~8, ~~equal~~2010, ~~voting~~certain ~~rights,~~present ~~are~~and ~~non-assessable~~former officers and ~~have~~directors ~~one~~of ~~vote~~the ~~per~~Company ~~share~~agreed to cancel a total of 183,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company. ~~Voting~~ In ~~rights~~addition, ~~are~~these individuals entered into restricted stock agreements wherein they agreed that, until November 30, 2012, they would not ~~cumulative~~sell, ~~and~~alienate, ~~therefore~~pledge, ~~the~~assign, ~~holders~~transfer, convey or in any way encumber any of ~~more~~their ~~than~~remaining ~~50%~~shares (a total of 14,000,000 shares upon execution of the aforementioned agreement) of the Company’s common stock. From ~~could~~December 1, if2012 ~~they~~until ~~choose~~November 30, 2014, these four individuals have each agreed to dolimit sohis sales of the Company’s common stock to no more than 200,000 ~~elect~~shares ~~all~~during any consecutive period of ~~the~~90 ~~directors~~days. The actual cancellation of the ~~Company~~shares occurred in January 2011.

~~The~~On ~~accompanying~~December ~~financial~~8, ~~statements~~2010, ~~give~~two ~~retroactive~~consultants ~~effect~~who tohad ~~the~~been ~~aforementioned~~issued ~~name~~an ~~change~~aggregate ~~and~~of ~~stock~~20,000,000 ~~split~~shares of common stock for their future consulting services valued at $33,335 agreed to surrender all ~~periods~~of ~~presented~~their stock for cancellation for no consideration. The unamortized balance of their deferred consulting agreements, amounting to $7,236 was also cancelled. The actual cancellation of the shares occurred in January 2011.

~~F-8~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

This section of this report includes a number of forward-10 looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.

~~ITEM~~Plan ~~2. MANAGEMENT’S~~of ~~DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.~~Operation

~~This~~We ~~section~~are ofa ~~this~~start-up ~~report~~corporation ~~includes~~and have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business operations. Our original business plan involved the operating a ~~number~~chain of ~~forward-~~retail ~~looking~~locations ~~statements~~and ~~that~~we ~~reflect~~leased our ~~current~~first ~~views~~store. We ~~with~~did ~~respect~~not tocommence ~~future~~retail ~~events~~operations and, ~~financial~~instead, ~~performance.~~changed ~~Forward-looking~~our ~~statements~~plan ~~are~~of ~~often~~operation ~~identified~~to byacquire ~~words~~a ~~like:~~facility ~~believe~~to recycle liquids, ~~expect~~such as soda, ~~estimate~~juices, ~~anticipate~~beer, ~~intend~~wine, ~~project~~spirits, syrups, and ~~similar~~waste ~~expressions,~~alcohol orfrom ~~words~~pharmaceutical ~~which~~and industrial sources, bywhich ~~their~~are ~~nature,~~destined ~~refer~~for todisposal, ~~future~~into ~~events~~ethanol. This ~~You~~business ~~should~~plan ~~not~~was ~~place~~later ~~undue~~abandoned ~~certainty~~and, onin ~~these~~November, ~~forward-looking statements~~2010, ~~which~~the ~~apply~~Company ~~only~~determined asto ofenter the ~~date~~gold ofexploration ~~this~~and ~~report.~~development ~~These~~business, ~~forward-looking~~by ~~statements~~acquiring ~~are~~interests ~~subject~~in toseveral ~~certain~~mining ~~risks~~claims and ~~uncertainties~~mineral ~~that~~leases ~~could~~in ~~cause~~the ~~actual~~state ~~results~~of toArizona, ~~differ~~commonly ~~materially~~known ~~from~~as ~~historical~~the ~~results~~Oatman orGold ~~our predictions~~Project.

~~Plan~~Oatman ofGold ~~Operation~~Project Property Description

WeThe ~~are~~Oatman aGold ~~start-up~~Project ~~corporation~~(the "Project") ~~and~~is ~~have~~comprised ~~not~~of ~~yet~~approximately ~~generated~~3,600 oracres ~~realized~~of ~~any~~mining ~~revenues~~claims ~~from~~in ~~our~~one ~~business operations. Our original business plan involved operating a chain~~ of ~~retail~~Arizona's ~~locations~~gold ~~which~~producing ~~we are no longer pursuing~~districts. The ~~lease~~Oatman ofGold ~~our~~District ~~first~~is ~~store~~located ~~was~~in ~~terminated and~~ the ~~related~~southern ~~property~~portion ~~and equipment has been abandoned. In December 2009, control~~ of ~~our~~the ~~Company~~Black ~~was acquired by another entity and~~Mountains, ~~together~~about ~~with~~30 amiles ~~new~~southwest ~~team~~ of ~~executive and management personnel who are in process of implementing a new business plan. It is now our intent to acquire a facility to recycle liquids~~Kingman, ~~such~~Mohave ~~as soda~~County, ~~juices~~ Arizona, ~~beer, wine, spirits, syrups,~~ and ~~waste~~approximately ~~alcohol~~100 ~~from~~miles ~~pharmaceutical~~southeast ~~and~~of ~~industrial~~Las ~~sources~~Vegas, ~~which are destined for disposal, into ethanol~~Nevada. We Access ~~also intend to recycle the packaging materials originally containing the liquid waste. The implementation of our new business plan~~ is ~~dependent~~via ~~upon~~US ~~our~~Highway ~~raising approximately $6 million to purchase or construct a processing facility~~66, ~~institute~~ awhich ~~marketing~~passes ~~program~~through ~~to attract customers and provide working capital for operating personnel and related expenses until such time as profitable operations are achieved, if ever. Since acquiring control of~~ the ~~Company~~central part ~~through October 9, 2010, we have raised $80,000 from investors in a private placement~~ of ~~common stock and we have borrowed $126,000 from our officers and several investors~~the district.

~~Should~~Since wethe ~~achieve~~original ~~revenue~~discovery ~~producing~~of ~~operations,~~gold ifwas wemade ~~are~~in ~~unable~~1863, tothe ~~generate~~Oatman ~~sufficient~~Gold ~~revenues~~Mining District, Mohave weCounty, ~~may~~Arizona, ~~have~~has toproduced ~~suspend~~approximately or2.2 ~~cease~~million ~~operations. If~~ounces weof ~~cease~~gold ~~operations,~~and approximately .08 wemillion doounces ~~not~~of ~~have~~silver ~~any~~from approximately ~~plans~~3.8 tomillion dotons ~~anything~~of ~~else~~ore.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin operations. There is no assurance we will ever reach this point. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than operations. Our only other source for cash at this time is from advances by our officers and investors.13

~~Limited~~The ~~Operating~~Oatman ~~History;~~Gold ~~Need~~Project ~~for~~includes ~~Additional~~the ~~Capital~~"Argo", "King Midas" and "Lexington" Gold Mines.

~~There~~ (1) The "Argo Gold Mine" is nolocated ~~historical~~on ~~financial~~the ~~information~~Tom ~~about~~Reed usgold ~~upon~~vein. The ~~which~~first towork ~~base~~done anon ~~evaluation~~the Tom Reed vein was in 1901 when the Gold Road Company sank the Tom Reed and Ben Harrison shafts to a depth of ~~our~~100 ~~performance~~feet. The Weproperty ~~have~~was ~~not~~bonded ~~generated~~in ~~any~~1904 ~~revenues~~and ~~from~~a ~~operations~~20-stamp mill was constructed and some developing and stoping was performed. The WeTom ~~cannot~~Reed ~~guarantee~~Gold weMines ~~will~~Company bepurchased ~~successful~~the company in ~~our~~1906 ~~business~~and ~~operations~~started producing in 1908. Total ~~Our~~yield ~~business~~from isthe ~~subject~~Tom toReed ~~risks~~property ~~inherent~~from in1908 through 1931 ~~the~~was ~~establishment~~reported at approximately 632,000 ounces of agold ~~new~~and ~~business~~gold ~~enterprise~~equivalent. Also, ~~including~~located ~~limited~~on ~~capital~~the ~~resources~~Tom ~~and~~Reed ~~possible~~gold ~~cost~~vein ~~overruns~~was ~~due~~the Black Eagle ore body, which was developed to ~~price~~the ~~and~~1,100 ~~cost~~foot ~~increases~~level. On inthe ~~goods~~900-foot level, the Black Eagle ore body was over 400 feet long and ~~services~~an average of 7 feet wide. We The ~~need~~United ~~additional~~Eastern ~~capital~~Mine toexploited ~~operate~~a ~~during~~northwestern portion of the ~~next~~Tom ~~twelve~~Reed ~~months~~vein. On the 465-foot level a crosscut went through 25 feet of ore with a grade of over one ounce gold per ton. The total yield of the United Eastern Mine from 1917 to 1926 was reported at approximately at 719,000 ounces of gold and gold equivalent.

To (2) The ~~become~~"King ~~profitable~~Midas Gold Mine" is located on the next parallel vein south of the Tom Reed vein. The workings consist of a 310-foot shaft and ~~competitive~~several surface cuts on the footwall of an outcrop of a weathered, wenorthwest ~~have~~southeast striking torhyolitic ~~attract~~dike. Laterals ~~customers~~are reported at the 100-foot, 200-foot and ~~generate~~200 ~~revenues~~foot levels, with several hundred feet of lateral drifting from the shaft. There is a second 300-foot shaft northwest of the first shaft, with levels at 60 feet,100 feet, 200 feet and 300 feet. During the 1980's, Fischer-Watt Gold conducted a drilling campaign in the Oatman area and a portion of the Company’s central claim block is located within the drilled ground. A gold resource was reportedly defined and brought into limited production at the "King Midas Gold Mine" by Fischer-Watt Gold, but the mine was closed before it was brought into full production.

(3) The "Lexington Gold Mine" is a gold deposit, located on private property south of the "King Midas Gold Mine", and includes approximately 90 acres of patented mineral rights with almost a mile of a gold vein system comprised of three known ore bearing veins. Several of the Company’s unpatented mining claims maybe located to the probable southeast extensions of the mineralized vein structures exploited at the "Lexington Gold Mine" Group. Numerous productive northwest-11southeast veins, namely the Guilt Edge, Mitchell Golconda, Leland-Boundary Cone, Gold Key, Boer, Arizona Tom Reed-Gold Dust, Orion and possibly the Bell and Oatman Queen-Tom Reed Jr. veins may converge at or near the Lexington Group of claims. This area of convergence, combined with its location between the large producing Gold Road and Tom Reed Mines and central to the district as a whole, may have a potential for the discovery of ore.

~~Equity~~The ~~financing~~Company’s claims ~~could~~also ~~result~~cover inseveral ~~additional~~other ~~dilution~~gold tomines ~~existing~~including ~~shareholders~~the "Big Johnnie Gold Mine", "Lucky Boy Gold Mine", "Pictured Rock Gold Mine" and the "Tom Reed Junior Gold Mine".

AsThe ofCompany’s ~~the~~claims ~~date~~also ofinclude ~~this~~the "Oatman ~~report~~Southern Gold Mine", wewhich may have potential as a possible low-grade ~~yet~~detachment fault gold deposit. The southern claim block also includes 12 additional gold mines which, upon sampling, may prove to be exploration ~~begin~~targets: ~~operations~~"Adams", ~~and~~"Cone", ~~therefore~~"Esperanza", "Green ~~have~~Quartz", ~~not~~"Lazy ~~generated~~Boy", ~~any~~"Oatman ~~revenues~~Syndicate", "Paragon", "Peerless", "S. Arataba", "United Oatman", "United Range", and "Wrigley" Gold Mines.

~~Liquidity~~The Oatman Mining District has historically been one of Arizona's best-known gold mining districts, and ~~Capital~~was ~~Resources~~in continuous production from the early 1900's up until 1942, when President Roosevelt closed the gold mines during World War II as nonessential to the war effort. In addition to the Oatman Gold Project, there are other properties in the Oatman Mining District that have seen gold exploration and development activity.

~~As of August 31, 2010, our total assets were $25,171 consisting of cash ($3,373) and deferred consulting expenses ($21,798). Our total liabilities were $353,291.~~14

~~Subsequent~~Business toPlan ~~the~~Risks December 2009 change of control we have raised $80,000 in cash from investors who received 4,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.02 per share and have borrowed by the issue of convertible notes payable, $120,000 from officers and investors. In addition, during August 2010, an officer has advanced $6,000 to us under unspecified terms.

IfThe weCompany’s ~~are~~business ~~unable~~plan is prone to ~~raise~~significant ~~additional~~risks ~~cash~~and weuncertainties ~~will~~which ~~either~~could have an immediate impact on its efforts to ~~suspend~~generate a positive net cash flow and could deter the anticipated exploration and development of its mining interests. Historically, the Company has not generated sufficient cash flow to sustain operations ~~until~~and has had to rely on debt or equity financing to remain in business. Therefore, we docannot ~~raise~~offer future expectations that any interests owned by the Company will be commercially developed or that its operations will be sufficient to generate the revenue required. Should we be unable to generate cash flow, the Company may be forced to seek additional debt or ~~cease~~equity ~~operations~~financing ~~entirely~~as alternatives to the cessation of operations. As The success of such measures can in no way be assured. Inherently, in the ~~date~~exploration of ~~this~~mineral ~~report~~properties, wethere ~~have~~are substantial risks which the Company may not ~~initiated~~be ~~revenue~~able ~~producing~~to mitigate and could result in a cessation of operations.

~~Results~~Going ~~of Operations~~Concern

~~Period~~Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin operations. There is no assurance we will ever reach this point. Accordingly, we must raise cash from ~~April~~sources 27other than operations. Our only other source for cash at this time is from the North American Gold & Minerals Fund Line of Credit. However, ~~2005~~based ~~(inception)~~on published financial statements, North American Gold & Minerals Fund does not have sufficient cash to ~~August~~provide 31us with any funding. Accordingly, ~~2010:~~we have no assurances that North American Gold & Minerals Fund will have the funds available to lend us at the time requested.

~~Since~~Limited ~~inception~~Operating onHistory; ~~April~~Need ~~27, 2005, we have not generated any revenues. Our expenses from inception through August 31, 2010 were $613,361, comprised of $142,282~~ for ~~legal~~Additional ~~and accounting fees, $35,000 for financing fees, $436,079 for general and administrative expenses and $7,381 for interest expense. Offsetting these expenses was $7,000 for debt forgiveness.~~Capital

~~Three~~There ~~Month~~is ~~Period~~no ~~Ending~~historical ~~August~~financial 31information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We have not generated any revenues from operations. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, ~~2010~~including ~~compared~~limited ~~with~~capital ~~2009:~~resources and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in goods and services. We need additional capital to operate during the next twelve months.

InTo ~~the~~become ~~three~~profitable ~~month~~and ~~period from June 1~~competitive, ~~2010~~we have to ~~August~~explore ~~31, 2010~~ our ~~net~~mining ~~loss~~claims ~~from operations was $132~~and,~~389~~ ~~versus~~if ~~$19,217~~economically ~~for the three month period ended August 31~~feasible, ~~2009,~~develop ~~for~~and anopen ~~increase~~a ~~of $113,172~~mine. ~~These~~ In ~~increases~~the ~~were~~event ~~the~~that ~~result~~we ofare ~~higher~~unable ~~general~~to ~~and~~sell ~~administrative~~ore ~~expense,~~or ~~$115,645~~arrange ~~and~~for ~~interest~~toll ~~expense~~milling, ~~$3,545. The~~we ~~increase~~will inalso ~~general~~need ~~and administrative expenses was principally due~~ to ~~officer~~design and ~~director~~build ~~compensation,~~a ~~$82,500,~~gold ~~fees~~recovery ~~paid to consultants, $17,667, travel $5,746 and amortization, $5,454~~facility.

~~Recent~~Equity ~~Accounting~~financing ~~Pronouncements~~could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.

InAs ~~October 2009,~~of ~~FASB~~the ~~issued~~date ASU 2009-13 Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). ASU 2009-05 provides accounting and financial reporting disclosure amendments for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this ~~ASU~~report, iswe ~~not~~have ~~anticipated~~yet to ~~have~~begin aoperations ~~material~~and ~~impact~~therefore onhave ~~the~~not ~~Company’s~~generated ~~financial~~any ~~position or results of operations~~revenues.

~~-12-~~Liquidity and Capital Resources

InAs ~~September~~of ~~2009~~November 30, ~~the FASB issued ASU 2009-12~~2010, ~~Fair~~our ~~Value~~total ~~Measurements~~assets ~~and~~were ~~Disclosures~~$111,359, ~~(Topic~~including ~~820):~~cash ~~Investments~~of in$1,227. Our ~~Certain~~total ~~Entities~~liabilities ~~That~~were ~~Calculate~~$171,607. If ~~Net~~we ~~Asset~~are ~~Value~~unable ~~per~~to ~~Share~~raise ~~(or~~additional ~~Its~~cash ~~Equivalent).~~we ~~ASU~~will ~~2009-12~~either ~~provides~~have ~~amendments~~ to ~~Subtopic~~suspend ~~820-10,~~operations ~~Fair~~until ~~Value~~we ~~Measurements~~do ~~and~~raise ~~Disclosures~~the ~~– Overall~~cash, ~~for~~or ~~the~~cease ~~fair~~operations ~~value~~entirely. As ~~measurement~~ of ~~investments~~the indate ~~certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The adoption~~ of this ~~ASU~~report, inwe ~~not anticipated to~~ have anot ~~material~~initiated ~~impact~~revenue-producing ~~on the Company’s financial position or results of operation~~operations.

In August 2009, FASB issued ASU 2009-05 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (Topic 820). ASU 2009-05 provides amendments for the fair value measurement of liabilities and clarification on fair value measuring techniques. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after the issuance. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations15

~~ITEM~~Results ~~3. QUANTITATIVE~~of ~~AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.~~Operations

WePeriod ~~are~~from aApril ~~smaller~~27, ~~reporting~~2005 ~~company~~(original inception) ~~as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required~~ to ~~provide~~November ~~the~~18, ~~information under this item.~~2010:

~~ITEM~~Since 4the Company’s original inception on April 27, 2005, we have not generated any revenues. ~~CONTROLS~~ Our ~~AND~~expenses ~~PROCEDURES~~from that inception through November 18, 2010 were $723,240 which are now deemed to be attributed to discontinued operations. As of November 18, 2010, the Company began a new exploration stage with the acquisition of mineral property interests. The Company recognized a loss of $908,507 from its initial operations under the exploration stage as of November 30, 2010.

~~Evaluation~~Three ofand ~~Disclosure~~Six ~~Controls~~Month ~~and~~Periods ~~Procedures~~Ending November 30, 2010 compared with 2009:

In ~~connection with~~ the ~~preparation~~three ofand ~~this~~six ~~annual~~month ~~report~~periods onending ~~Form~~November ~~10-K~~30, an2010, ~~evaluation~~the ~~was~~loss ~~carried~~from ~~out~~continuing byoperations ~~the~~was $908,507. The Company’s ~~management,~~most ~~with~~significant ~~the~~expense ~~participation~~for ofits ~~the~~newly ~~Principal~~acquired ~~Executive~~mineral ~~Officer~~property ~~and~~rights ~~the~~was ~~Principal Financial Officer~~$1,181,000 ofduring ~~the~~its ~~effectiveness~~initial month of ~~the~~operations. This ~~Company’s~~expense ~~disclosure~~was ~~controls~~offset ~~and~~by ~~procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under~~ the ~~Securities~~cancellation ~~Exchange Act~~ of ~~1934~~accrued ~~(“Exchange~~compensation ~~Act”)~~expense as of ~~August 31~~$277, ~~2010~~371. ~~Disclosure~~ ~~controls~~Since ~~and~~the ~~procedures~~Company’s ~~are~~exploration ~~designed~~stage toof ~~ensure~~operations ~~that~~began ~~information required to be disclosed~~ in ~~reports~~November ~~filed~~2010, orthe ~~submitted~~six ~~under~~month ~~the~~financial ~~Exchange~~information ~~Act~~ is ~~recorded,~~substantially ~~processed, summarized, and reported within~~ the ~~time~~same ~~periods~~as ~~specified in~~ the ~~SEC~~three ~~rules~~month ~~and~~financial ~~forms~~information. ~~and~~All ~~that~~other ~~such~~prior ~~information~~activities isfor ~~accumulated~~2010 and ~~communicated~~2009 toare ~~management,~~accounted ~~including~~for ~~the~~as ~~Principal~~part ~~Executive~~of ~~Officer and~~ the ~~Principal~~Company’s ~~Financial~~discontinued ~~Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.~~operations

~~Based~~Recent onAccounting that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.Pronouncements

~~Management’s~~The ~~Report~~Company has analyzed the Accounting Standards Updates that were issued after May 31, 2010 and have determined that none are anticipated to have a material impact on ~~Internal~~the ~~Control~~Company’s ~~over~~financial ~~Financial~~position ~~Reporting~~or results of operations.

~~Management~~ITEM ~~of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting~~3. ~~The~~ ~~Company’s~~QUANTITATIVE ~~internal~~AND ~~control~~QUALITATIVE ~~over~~DISCLOSURES ~~financial~~ABOUT reporting is a process, under the supervision of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)MARKETRISK. ~~Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:~~

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-~~13-~~2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

*ITEM ~~Pertain~~4. toCONTROLS ~~the~~AND maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; * Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Board of Directors; and * Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statementsPROCEDURES.

~~Because~~Under ofthe ~~its~~supervision ~~inherent~~and ~~limitations,~~with ~~internal~~the ~~control~~participation ~~over~~of ~~financial~~our ~~reporting~~management, ~~may~~including ~~not~~the ~~prevent~~Chief orExecutive ~~detect~~Officer ~~misstatements. Also~~and Chief Financial Officer, ~~projections~~we ofhave ~~any~~evaluated ~~evaluation~~the effectiveness of ~~effectiveness~~our todisclosure ~~future~~controls ~~periods~~and ~~are~~procedures ~~subject~~as torequired ~~the~~by ~~risk~~Exchange ~~that~~Act ~~controls~~Rule ~~may~~13a-15(b) ~~become~~as ~~inadequate~~of ~~because~~the end of ~~changes~~the inperiod ~~conditions~~covered orby this report. Based on that evaluation, the ~~degree~~Chief ofExecutive ~~compliance~~Officer ~~with~~and ~~the~~Chief ~~policies~~Financial orOfficer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures ~~may~~were ~~deteriorate~~not effective during the quarter ended November 30, 2010.

~~The~~There ~~Company’s~~were ~~management~~no ~~conducted~~changes anin ~~assessment~~our ~~of the effectiveness of the Company’s~~ internal control over financial reporting asduring ofthe ~~August~~quarter 31ended November 30, 2010, that ~~based~~have onmaterially ~~criteria~~affected, ~~established~~or inare ~~Internal~~reasonably ~~Control~~likely –to ~~Integrated~~materially ~~Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment~~affect, ~~management~~our ~~identified a material weakness in~~ internal control over financial reporting.

APART ~~material~~II. ~~weakness~~OTHER is a control deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.INFORMATION

~~The~~ITEM ~~material~~1A. ~~weakness~~RISK ~~identified is described below.~~FACTORS

~~Lack~~We ofare ~~Appropriate~~a ~~Independent~~smaller ~~Oversight. Fundamental~~reporting ~~elements~~company ~~of an effective control environment were missing~~ as ofdefined ~~August~~by ~~31,~~Rule ~~2010,~~12b-2 ~~including independent oversight and monitoring~~ of ~~financial reporting, financial reporting processes and procedures, and internal control procedures. At present,~~ the ~~Board~~Securities ofExchange ~~Directors~~Act ~~is comprised entirely~~ of ~~individuals~~1934 ~~performing~~and ~~management functions. Because no Directors~~ are ~~independent,~~not norequired ~~Audit Committee has been established~~ to ~~which~~provide the ~~Board~~information ~~could~~under ~~delegate its oversight responsibilities. Accordingly, our management has determined that~~ this ~~control deficiency constitutes a material weakness~~item.

Segregation of duties. Due to the size of the Company, it was not possible to ensure adequate segregation of duties between incompatible functions, and management has not established or implemented monitoring procedures to mitigate this risk. Due to a lack of personnel, it was not possible to ensure that both routine and non-routine financial information was adequately analyzed and reviewed on a timely basis to detect misstatements.16

AsITEM a6. result of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described above, the Company’s management has concluded that, as of August 31, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSOEXHIBITS.

~~-14-~~The following documents are included herein:

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Exhibit No.	Document Description

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the period ended August 31, 2010, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.17

~~PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION~~SIGNATURES

~~ITEM~~Pursuant ~~1A. RISK~~to ~~FACTORS~~the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on this 24th day of January, 2011.

WeRENAISSANCE ~~are~~BIOENERGY aINC. ~~smaller~~BY: ~~reporting~~/s/ ~~company~~RONALD asYADIN ~~defined~~LOWENTHAL byRONALD ~~Rule~~YADIN ~~12b-2~~LOWENTHAL ofPresident ~~the~~and ~~Securities~~Principal ~~Exchange~~Executive ~~Act~~Officer ofand ~~1934~~BY: ~~and~~/s/ ~~are~~RONALD ~~not~~YADIN ~~required~~LOWENTHAL toRONALD ~~provide~~YADIN ~~the~~LOWENTHAL ~~information~~Chief ~~under~~Financial ~~this~~Officer ~~item.~~and Principal Financial Officer

~~ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.~~18

The following documents are included herein:

Exhibit No.	Document Description
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-15-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on this 14th day of October, 2010.

RENAISSANCE BIOENERGY INC. (the “Registrant”) BY: SCOTT PUMMILL Scott Pummill President and Principal Executive Officer BY: SAMUEL GULKO Samuel Gulko Principal Financial Officer

-16-

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Document Description
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

-17-

Filing Compare · ASPA Gold Corp