SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED] For the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2007

For the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2006

o[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] For the transition period from ______ to ______.

For the transition period from ______ to ______.

0-17793

(Commission File Number)

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its governing instruments)

Delaware		13-3481443
(State or other jurisdiction of organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Wilder Richman Historic Corporation
340 Pemberwick Road
Greenwich, Connecticut		06831
(Address of principal executive offices)
		(Zip code)

Wilder Richman Historic Corporation
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:	(203) 869-0900
340 Pemberwick Road
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	None
Greenwich, Connecticut		06831
	(Title of each Class)
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:		(203) 869-0900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:		None
		(Title of each Class)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No X

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes No X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No X

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in a definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer Non-Accelerated Filer X

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X

As of ~~May 31~~September 13, ~~2006~~2011, Registrant has ~~800~~0 outstanding units of limited partnership interest.

The aggregate sales price of the units of limited partnership interest held by non-affiliates of the Registrant is $19,280,000. There is currently no public market for the units of limited partnership interest and, accordingly, such figure does not represent the market value for the units. In December 2007, the general partner formed a liquidating trust, and all of the Registrant’s remaining assets have been transferred to such liquidating trust. Registrant has also filed a Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State. The Registrant filed a final Federal tax return in 2007.

Documents incorporated by reference:

The Prospectus of the Registrant, dated May 13, 1988 and filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(iii) under the Securities Act of 1933, is incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General Development of Business and Narrative Description of Business

Registrant is a limited partnership which was formed under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act on October 15, 1987. The general partner of Registrant is Wilder Richman Historic Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "General Partner" or "WRHC").

Registrant was organized to acquire all of the limited partnership interests in Dixon Mill Associates I (Phase One), Limited Partnership, Dixon Mill Associates II (Phase Two), Limited Partnership, and Dixon Mill Associates III (Phase Three), Limited Partnership, each of which is a New Jersey limited partnership (individually "Dixon Mill I," "Dixon Mill II" and "Dixon Mill III," respectively, and collectively the "Operating Partnerships"). each ~~Each~~ Operating Partnership ~~owns~~ owned one phase ("Phase") of an aggregate 433-unit residential apartment complex (the "Complex") located in Jersey City, New Jersey, that consists of buildings designated as certified historic structures by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The Operating Partnerships ~~have~~ constructed, ~~substantially rehabilitated~~ and ~~are~~substantially ~~operating~~rehabilitated the Complex., ~~The~~which ~~rehabilitation of the Complex~~ qualified for a rehabilitation tax credit in 1988, 1989 and 1990. The Operating Partnerships operated the Complex until it was sold on November 14, 2006. The general partner of the Operating Partnerships is Dixon Venture Corp. (the "Operating General Partner"), which is not an affiliate of Registrant or WRHC.

Pursuant to Registrant's prospectus dated May 13, 1988, (the "Prospectus"), Registrant offered $19,280,000 of units of limited partnership interest in Registrant (the "Units") at an offering price of $24,100 per Unit. The Units were registered under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 33-19646). The Prospectus is incorporated herein by reference.

The closing of the offering of Units (the "Offering") occurred on July 15, 1988. At such closing, 800 Units were sold, representing $19,280,000 in gross proceeds. After payment of $674,800 of organization and offering expenses, $674,800 in an origination fee and $1,349,600 of selling commissions, the net proceeds available for investment were $16,580,800. Of such net proceeds, $16,388,000 was allocated to the investment in the Operating Partnerships, which included investments in guaranteed investment contracts. The remainder of $192,800 was designated as working capital to be used for operating expenses of Registrant.

The Operating Partnerships received a written offer effective May 24, 2006 from a non-affiliate third party to purchase the real estate assets for $69,960,000. The purchaser however canceled the Agreement of Purchase and Sale in October, 2006 after the Operating General Partner was unable to obtain the approval of the sale from the tax exempt bond issuer. After such approval was obtained, the Agreement of Purchase and Sale was reinstated with a purchase price of $69,460,000. The sale of the assets took place on November 14, 2006.

At the Sale, the Operating Partnerships repaid in full all outstanding mortgages totaling $26,435,000 and deposited an Agency-required escrow of $2,000,000. In addition, the Operating Partnerships incurred closing costs of $2,792,442 and made a distribution to Registrant in the amount of $32,378,126, with an additional amount owing of $5,602,706, which was set aside for estimated NJ non-resident withholding tax. The $2,000,000 escrow was set aside from Sale proceeds otherwise payable to the Operating General Partner pursuant to the terms of the limited partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships. Accordingly, if such amount or any portion thereof is released pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement between the Operating Partnerships and the Agency, any such amount will be distributed to the Operating General Partner.

During the year ended February 28, 2008, Registrant received the remaining proceeds from Sale of $2,869,088 (net of State of New Jersey withholding taxes on non–resident partners in the amount of $2,715,098 and State of New Jersey filing fees of $18,520) and made additional distributions of $2,888,032 to the limited partners and $320,825 in aggregate to the General Partner and Special Limited Partner. Subsequent to February 28, 2008, distributions have been made to investor limited partners and the General Partner totaling $141,565 and $171, respectively, with approximately $585,000 held back for potential unforeseen costs, pursuant to the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement.

Registrant filed a final Federal tax return effective December 31, 2007. All remaining cash was deposited into a nominee account held by the General Partner on behalf of Registrant. As of July 31, 2011 the Registrant’s nominee cash account had a balance of $539,095. It is the Registrant’s current intention to pay its remaining expenses (primarily professional fees associated with this filing) and distribute the balance, if any, to its partners by December 31, 2011.

Financial Information About Industry Segments

Registrant is was engaged solely in the business of owning a limited partnership interest in each of the Operating Partnerships. A presentation of information regarding industry segments is not applicable and would not be material to an understanding of Registrant’s business taken as a whole. See Item 8 below for a summary of Registrant's operations.

Working Capital Reserves

As of February 28, ~~2006~~2007, Registrant had working capital reserves of approximately $~~165~~735,000, which were offset by accrued liabilities totaling $183,145.In ~~See~~December, ~~Item~~2007, 7the -General ~~"Management's Discussion~~Partner ~~and~~established ~~Analysis~~a nominee account from the remaining funds held by Registrant in the approximate amount of ~~Financial~~$735,000 ~~Condition~~to ~~and~~pay ~~Results~~any future expenses incurred by the Registrant in the process of ~~Operations~~terminating its affairs." As of July 31, 2011 the Partnership’s nominee cash account had a balance of $539,095. It is the Partnership’s intention to pay its remaining expenses (primarily professional fees associated with this filing), and distribute the balance, if any, to its partners by December 31, 2011.

See Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Competition

~~Information regarding~~The ~~competition,~~Registrant ~~general~~has ~~risks,~~sold ~~tax~~its ~~risks~~real ~~and~~estate ~~partnership~~assets ~~risks~~and ishas ~~set forth~~no ~~under~~other ~~the~~assets ~~heading~~other ~~"RISK~~than ~~FACTORS"~~cash. atRegistrant ~~pages~~is 37in -the 57process of ~~the~~terminating ~~Prospectus. See discussion~~its ~~below~~affairs; intherefore, ~~Item~~it 1Ais currently not impacted by competition.

Employees of Registrant

Registrant employs no personnel and incurs no payroll costs. An affiliate of the General Partner employs individuals who perform accounting, secretarial, transfer and other services on behalf of Registrant as are necessary in the ordinary course of business. Such individuals also ~~per-form~~perform similar services for other affiliates of the General Partner.

Tax Reform Act of 1986, Revenue Act of 1987, Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, Tax Extension Act of 1991, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Tax and Trade Relief Extension Act of 1998, Tax and Trade Relief Extension Act of 1999, Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000, Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 and American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (collectively the "Tax Acts")

Registrant is organized as a limited partnership and is a pass through tax entity which does not, itself, pay Federal income tax. However, the partners of Registrant who are subject to Federal income tax may be affected by the Tax Acts. Registrant will consider the effect of certain aspects of the Tax Acts on the partners when making decisions regarding its investment. Registrant does not anticipate that the Tax Acts will currently have a material adverse impact on Registrant's business operations, capital resources and plans or liquidity.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

~~Risks of~~The ~~Real~~Registrant ~~Estate~~has ~~Investments~~sold its real estate assets and ~~High~~has ~~Leverage~~no other assets other than cash. Registrant is in the process of terminating its affairs therefore only limited risk remains, such as the chance of an IRS or state tax audit.

Registrant’s investment in the Operating Partnerships is subject to the risks associated with multi-family rental property and real estate in general. Factors which may affect Registrant are subject to change and not in the control of Registrant. Those factors include adverse use of adjacent or neighborhood real estate, changes in the demand for or supply of competing properties, changes in state or local tax rates and assessments, increases in utility charges, unexpected expenditures for repairs and maintenance, changes in local economic conditions, changes in interest rates and the availability of financing which may render the sale or refinancing of the Complex difficult or unattractive. To the extent that commercial space is leased to tenants at rents related to a percentage of the gross receipts of the tenant, the performance of the Complex is subject to the risks inherent in the tenant’s business.

Registrant’s investments in the Operating Partnerships are highly leveraged and with variable rate debt. With the use of variable rate debt, an increase in interest rates could have an adverse impact on the cash flow of the Complex if such costs are not offset by an increase in rents charged to tenants. To the extent that revenues are not sufficient to meet operating expenses and service the mortgages of the Complex, the Operating Partnerships would be required to use reserves and any other funds available to avoid foreclosure of the property. There can be no assurance that additional funds would be available to the Operating Partnerships or Registrant, if needed. In addition, there can be no assurance that, when the Complex is sold, that the proceeds from a sale will be sufficient to pay the balance due on the mortgage loan or any other outstanding indebtedness to which the Complex is subject.

Lack of Geographic Diversity and Acts of Terrorism

As a result of potential economic changes in the Northeast region, the financial condition of the Operating Partnerships and their ability to satisfy operating costs and debt service and make cash flow distributions could be materially affected.

The events of September 11, 2001 have increased the risk that the operations of the Complex may be adversely impacted as a result of the effect of these events on the economy in general and because the Complex is located near New York City.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

The ~~Complex~~ ~~consists~~registrant of historic mill buildings built between 1847 and 1932, all of which are certified historic structures that have been converted and substantially rehabilitated into a 433 unit luxury apartment complex that has received financing exempt from Federal income taxation under Internal Revenue Code Section 103(b)(4)(A). As a consequence of this tax exempt financing, the Operating Partnerships are required to rent at least 15% of the dwelling units ("D.U.'s") in the Complex to individuals or families of low or moderate income as determined under such Code Section, currently ~~based~~owns on their income not exceeding 80% of the median income for the area as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). These income limits are subject to increases pursuant to HUD guidelines. In the Complex, 68 studio and efficiency D.U.'s and 17 one-bedroom D.U.'s are set aside for rental to low or moderate income persons. There are no ~~rent ceilings on those D~~properties.U.'s set aside for low or moderate income persons. Because such tax exempt financing consists of bonds sold in 1985, the 80% of median income limit is not required to be adjusted based on family size as would be required under the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

The Complex is located on a 4-acre site in Jersey City, New Jersey. In addition, one new five-story building, approximately 20 feet by 50 feet, was built on the site. The Complex is located in the Dixon Crucible Redevelopment Area, an area so designated pursuant to a redevelopment plan adopted in September 1983 by ordinance of the City of Jersey City. The actual development entails three Phases with each Phase owned by a separate New Jersey limited partnership, respectively Dixon Mill I, Dixon Mill II and Dixon Mill III. Phase I consists of seven industrial buildings which have been rehabilitated to provide 134 D.U.'s, 55 underground and 77 surface parking spaces and approximately 1,550 square feet of commercial space. Phase II consists of 11 industrial buildings which have been rehabilitated to provide 191 D.U.'s and 62 underground and 124 surface parking spaces. Phase III consists of four industrial buildings which have been rehabilitated to provide 108 D.U.'s, 35 underground and 73 surface parking spaces and approximately 2,230 square feet of commercial space.

The Complex features gardens, elevated walkways and brick paved walkways. The Complex also has its own electronic security system and a free shuttle service to the Grove Street PATH station is being provided. In addition, the residents of the Complex have access to a private fitness facility. The Complex's commercial space is designated for retail stores and/or professional offices.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the occupancy and rental rates were as follows:

	December 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Occupancy rate	99%		98%
Monthly Rental Rates:
Studio	$	885 - $ 1,095	$	885 - $ 1,095
One-Bedroom	$	836 - $ 1,750	$	835 - $ 1,750
Two-Bedroom	$	1,385 - $ 2,395	$	1,385 - $ 2,195
Three-Bedroom	$	1,695 - $ 2,073	$	1,695 - $ 2,073

The rental rates reflect significant ranges because the apartments vary as to size and floor plans (i.e., square footage, duplex, triplex, penthouse). The monthly rental rates for the D.U.’s in connection with the low-moderate tenant income restrictions resulting from the tax-exempt financing described above range from $609 to $1,000 as of December 31, 2005.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On December 21, 2005, a proposed class action suit was filed against the Operating Partnerships regarding the underpayment of security deposits to former tenants of the Property. It is uncertain as to the plaintiffs’ ability to obtain certification of the class and any judgments against the Operating Partnerships are inestimable.4

On December 21, 2005, a proposed class action suit was filed against the Operating Partnerships regarding the underpayment of security deposits to former tenants of the Property. The matter was settled in 2006 for a nominal amount, which was expensed during the year.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of the limited partners of Registrant during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market

There is no developed public market for the purchase and sale of Units and Registrant does not anticipate that such a market will develop before the registrant liquidates.

Holders

As of ~~May 31~~February 28, ~~2006~~2007, there were approximately ~~330~~340 record holders of Units holding an aggregate of 800 Units in Registrant.

Distributions

The Agreement of Limited Partnership of Registrant provides that cash available for distribution, ~~if any,~~ be distributed annually to the partners in specified proportions, subject to the discretion of the Operating General Partner. ~~The~~Distributions received from the Operating Partnerships are pursuant to the terms of the limited partnership agreements of the Operating Partnership. For the year ended February 28, 2007 the investor limited partners received distributions of $~~680~~31,444,000 ~~and~~from ~~$600~~the sale of the Operating Partnerships’ real estate assets on November 14,~~012~~ ~~for~~2006, inclusive of the ~~years~~cumulative ~~ended~~preferred distribution in the amount of $18,888,730. The General Partner’s share of the distributions in the amount of $317,649 was paid subsequent to February 28, ~~2006~~2007. Additional ~~and~~distributions ~~2005~~were made to limited partners subsequent to February 28, ~~respectively~~2007 in the amount of $5,602,706; such amount is inclusive of required New Jersey withholding payments made on behalf of nonresident limited partners. The limited partners received distributions of $680,000 for the year ended February 28, 2006.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

	Year Ended
	February 28, 2006 (a)			February 28, 2005 (a)			February 29, 2004			February 28, 2003			February 28, 2002
	February 28, 2007 (a)				February 28, 2006 (a)				February 28, 2005 (a)				February 29, 2004			February 28, 2003
Total revenues	$	76,~~194~~544,~~193~~647		$	~~6,868,356~~$	7,194,193	$	~~918~~	$	$6,868,356	~~2,115~~		$	~~4,674~~918		$	2,115
Equity in income of investment in operating partnerships	$	--		$	--$	--	$	~~413,727~~	$	$--	~~851,780~~		$	~~386~~413,~~617~~727		$	851,780
Net income	$	~~375~~37,~~916~~164,087	(b)	$	~~138,125~~$	375,916	$	~~110,448~~	$	$138,125	~~695,620~~		$	~~342~~110,~~738~~448		$	695,620
Net income per unit of limited partnership interest	$	~~465~~45,990		$	~~171~~$	465	$	~~137~~	$	$171	~~861~~		$	~~424~~137		$	861
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	32289,~~737~~859		$	~~(221,663~~$	)32,737	$	~~(303,279~~	)$	$(221,663	~~(156,160~~)	)	$	(43303,~~879~~279	)	$	(156,160	)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations per unit of limited partnership interest	$	41359		$	~~(274~~$	)41	$	~~(375~~	)$	$(274	~~(193~~)	)	$	(54375	)	$	(193	)
Distributions to limited partners	$	~~680~~31,444,000		$	~~600,012~~$	680,000	$	~~1,060,172~~	$	$600,012	--		$	--1,060,172		$	--
Distributions per unit of limited partnership interest	$	~~850~~39,305		$	~~750~~$	850	$	~~1,325~~	$	$750	--		$	--1,325		$	--
At year end: Total assets	$	44,794,461		$	47,172,799		$	1,675,809		$	2,571,508		$	1,753,515
At year end:
Mortgages payable	$	26,435,000		$	28,600,000
Total assets	$	8,072,299			$	44,794,461			$	47,172,799			$	1,675,809		$	2,571,508
Mortgages payable	$	--			$	26,435,000			$	28,600,000

(a) Includes operations and total assets of the Operating Partnerships due to the change in accounting to consolidate the Operating Partnerships effective March 1, 2004.

(b)Includes gains on sale of real estate assets of $28,002,756 and the Operating Partnerships’ net income allocation between partners to adjust capital accounts for current and future distributions in connection with the liquidation of the partnership.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Operating General Partner commenced a process to receive proposals for the sale of the Complex during October 2005. An agreement to sell the Complex was negotiated and executed effective April 3, 2006, subject to a due diligence period for the purchaser as well as other various terms and conditions including the Operating Partnership obtaining the approval of the sale by the issuer of the tax exempt bonds, which where to be paid off at the time of sale (the “Agreement of Purchase and Sale”). The Agreement of Purchase and Sale was extended ~~four~~several times, with the ~~most~~latest ~~recent~~ being on May 24, 2006, resulting in ~~an offer~~a renegotiated purchase price of $69,960,000 and a nonrefundable deposit of $4,390,000. The ~~due diligence period has expired and a closing has been scheduled for July 14~~purchaser, ~~2006, subject~~ ~~to the approval of the transaction by the Partnership~~however, ~~among~~canceled ~~other conditions. The disposition of~~ the ~~Complex~~Agreement ~~is consistent with a plan~~ of ~~liquidation~~ Purchase and ~~winding~~Sale upin ~~of the business of Registrant~~October, ~~which plan is being enacted in~~ 2006 ~~considering~~after the ~~activities~~Operating ~~discussed~~General ~~above.~~Partner ~~Following~~was ~~the~~unable ~~sale of the Complex, if consummated, Registrant intends~~ to ~~distribute~~obtain the ~~net proceeds~~approval ~~to which it is entitled under the partnership agreements~~ of the ~~Operating~~ ~~Partnerships~~sale tofrom ~~its limited and general partners, in accordance with~~ the ~~terms~~tax ~~and~~exempt ~~conditions~~bond ofissuer. ~~the~~After ~~Agreement~~such ofapproval ~~Limited~~was ~~Partnership~~obtained of, ~~Registrant. After making~~ the ~~distribution,~~purchase ~~Registrant~~price ~~intends~~was renegotiated to ~~dissolve~~$69,460,000. The ~~offer indicates~~sale ~~that the carrying amount~~ of the ~~long-lived~~Complex ~~assets~~took isplace ~~recoverable based~~ on ~~applying~~November ~~the~~14, ~~standard accounting tests for impairment~~2006. The ~~Due~~adjusted topurchase ~~the~~price ~~likelihood of~~resulted ~~the~~in ~~sale~~a ofreduced ~~the~~distribution ~~Complex and Registrant’s plans~~ to ~~dissolve upon such sales and~~ the ~~winding~~Operating upGeneral ~~the~~Partner ~~business~~pursuant ofto ~~Registrant,~~ the ~~assets~~limited ~~and~~partnership ~~liabilities~~agreement of ~~the Complex~~ ~~are classified as held for sale in~~ the ~~accompanying~~Operating ~~consolidated~~Partnerships ~~balance sheet~~but asdid ~~of February 28, 2006. However, as the dissolution of Registrant was~~ not ~~imminent~~ asimpact ofdistributions ~~February~~to ~~28, 2006, the consolidated financial statements are presented assuming that~~ Registrant ~~will continue as a going concern~~. The ensuing discussion under liquidity and capital resources includes certain matters that are prospective in nature, taking into consideration that the sale of the Complex may not be consummated.

~~The Partnership's~~As ~~primary~~of ~~sources~~February 28, 2007, Registrant had working capital reserves of ~~funds~~approximately ~~are~~$735,000, ~~rents~~which ~~generated~~were offset by accrued liabilities totaling $183,145.In December, 2007, the ~~Operating Partnerships~~General ~~and~~Partner ~~interest~~established ~~derived~~a nominee account from ~~investments~~the ~~and~~remaining ~~deposits,~~funds ~~certain~~held by Registrant in the approximate amount of ~~which~~ ~~are~~$735,000 ~~restricted~~to inpay ~~accordance~~any ~~with~~future expenses incurred by the ~~terms~~Registrant ofin the ~~mortgages~~process of ~~the Operating~~terminating ~~Partnerships~~its affairs. ~~The~~As of July 31, 2011 the Partnership'’s ~~investments~~nominee ~~would~~cash ~~normally~~account ~~be considered~~had ~~highly~~a ~~illiquid;~~balance ~~see~~of ~~discussion~~$539,095. ~~above~~It ~~regarding~~is the ~~potential~~Partnership’s ~~sale~~intention to pay its remaining expenses (primarily professional fees associated with this filing), and of distribute the ~~Complex~~balance, if any, to its partners by December 31, 2011.

~~In the event~~The ~~the~~disposition ~~anticipated sale~~ of the Complex ~~noted above does not take place, the Partnership~~ is ~~not~~consistent ~~expected~~with toa ~~have~~plan ~~access to additional sources~~ of ~~financing. Accordingly,~~liquidation ~~if unforeseen contingencies arise that cause the Operating Partnerships to require capital in addi-tion to that contributed by the Partnership~~ and ~~any~~winding ~~equity~~up of the ~~Operating~~business ~~General Partners, potential sources from which such cap-ital needs will be able to be satisfied (other than reserves) would be additional equity contributions~~ of the Operating General Partner or other equity reserves, if any, which could adversely affect the distribution from the Operating Partnerships to the Partner-ship of operating cash flow and any sale or refinancing proceedsRegistrant.

Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. has very limited operating activity; accordingly, the results of operations reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations are highly representative of the Operating Partnerships. The ~~operating results of the~~ Complex for 2005 were similar to 2004; cash declined as a result of distributions to partners and capital expenditures undertaken in 2005. As a result of the refinancing of the Operating Partnerships’ mortgages in 2002, the Operating Partnerships have generated cash ~~flow.~~ ~~However, the Operating Partnerships’ ability to continue to generate cash~~ flow isfor ~~highly uncertain and will depend upon~~ the ~~level~~year ofended ~~interest~~December ~~rates of their variable rate mortgage loans and the future operating results of the Complex~~31, ~~which~~2006 ~~will be extremely dependent on competition, market conditions and needed capital improvements and repairs. Accordingly, there can be no assurance~~ as toa ~~whether~~result ~~or not Registrant may be able to make distributions, nor the timing or amount~~ of ~~any~~net ~~potential~~rental ~~distributions~~income tofor ~~Limited~~approximately ~~Partners~~10.5 ~~The Operating~~months ~~General Partner~~ and ~~the~~from ~~General Partner periodically assess~~ the ~~feasibility~~ ofsale ~~making cash flow distributions, based on the results~~ of ~~operations,~~ the ~~physical condition of the~~ Complex ~~(see discussion below), the current and anticipated interest rates, and local market conditions, among other things~~. The ToOperating ~~the~~Partnerships' ~~extent~~ cash ~~flow~~and ~~is generated by the Operating Partnerships, such~~ cash ~~flow~~equivalents ~~may~~as ~~be retained by the Operating Partnerships or may be distributed at the discretion~~ of management, pursuant to the terms of the limited partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships. To the extent there are net proceeds from a future sale or refinancing of the Complex, Registrant will receive 100% of any such proceeds available for distribution until Registrant has received a 7% cumulative preferred distribution pursuant to the terms of the limited partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships. As of December 31, ~~2005, the~~2006 ~~cumulative~~were ~~preferred~~distributed ~~distribution~~during ~~is approximately $17,443,873~~2007.

As disclosed in Registrant’s financial statements, Registrant adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46 (revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46(R)”), effective March 1, 2004. Accordingly, the balance sheets as of February 28, 2006 and 2005 and the statements of operations, partners’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended are consolidated with those of the Operating Partnerships. Prior to the adoption of FIN 46(R), the financial statements included the assets, liabilities and results of operations that relate to Registrant only and accounted for its investment in Operating Partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting.

The Complex generated cash flow from operations for the year ended December 31, 2005; however, the Operating Partnerships' cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2005 decreased by approximately $1,719,000 as compared to December 31, 2004(primarily as a result of the distributions made to Registrant and capital expenditures incurred, while accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased by approximately $70,000. The Replacement Reserve account, which is controlled by the lender, is approximately $40,000 as of December 31, 2005; the Operating Partnerships utilized replacement reserves of approximately $221,000 during 2005. The principal reserve, which is controlled by the lender for purposes of amortizing the debt, is approximately $90,000 as of December 31, 2005; the Operating Partnership utilized $2,165,000 of the Principal Reserve to fully pay down the second mortgage during 2005. In addition, the Operating Partnerships fund a non-lender required replacement reserve account, which balance is approximately $1,181,000 as of December 31, 2005. Each of the foregoing reserves and escrows are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet under the caption mortgage escrows and other deposits. Because the Partnership does not have sufficient cash to meet its operating costs, the Operating Partnerships made distributions in the amount of $850,000 to cover the costs incurred by the Partnership in connection with responses to tender offers and other professional fees and filing fees associated with filing Registrant’s tax return in the State of New Jersey; in addition, Registrant made a distribution to Unit holders during the year in the amount of $680,000.

Because the rehabilitation of the Complex was completed more than ten years ago, management has been addressing the need for extensive capital improvements in order to remain competitive in the rental market. Over recent years significant capital improvements have been undertaken for the Complex, including roof replacement, replacement of the fire/smoke alarm system, elevator repairs, new entry doors and other repairs throughout the Complex. In addition, the Operating General Partner has identified other potential significant capital improvements and repairs throughout the Complex, which it intends to address over the next few years. Such capital improvements and repairs would significantly reduce the Operating Partnerships’ cash flow available for distribution. The Operating Partnerships incurred capital expenditures of approximately $1.9 million in 2005. The Operating General Partner has identified other improvements, the timing of which may be discretionary but which may be important to remain competitive in the rental market, should be made over time. Such capital improvements and repairs would significantly reduce the Operating Partnerships’ cash available for distribution.

The Operating General Partner’s objective has been to build up reserves to a level sufficient to reasonably offset the potential adverse impact of future increases in the low floater rates (which are expected to increase) in addition to other contingencies, including capital improvements and potential significant increases in real estate taxes. The Operating General Partner intends to take these factors, among others, into account when considering making future distributions.

Results of Operations

The consolidated statements of operations in the accompanying financial statements are presented based on the determination that the Complex owned by the Operating Partnerships iswas held for sale ~~as of February 28, 2006~~ (and therefore reflect the operating activity of the Operating Partnerships as discontinued operations). ~~If the~~ However, ~~Complex~~as isthe ~~sold,~~dissolution of the ~~Partnership~~Registrant ~~intends~~was tonot ~~dissolve~~imminent ~~upon~~as ~~making~~of ~~final distributions~~February to28, ~~its~~2007, ~~partners.~~the ~~However,~~consolidated ~~there~~financial isstatements noare ~~assurance~~presented assuming that the ~~Complex~~ Partnership will ~~ultimately~~continue beas ~~sold~~a ~~pursuant~~going toconcern. The disposition of the ~~plan.~~Complex ~~Accordingly~~on November 14, ~~the~~2006 ~~Results~~is consistent with a plan of ~~Operations~~ ~~are~~liquidation ~~presented~~and ~~without~~winding ~~affect~~up toof the ~~presentation~~business of ~~discontinued operations~~Registrant.

Prior to the sale of the Complex, Registrant's operating results ~~are~~were highly dependent upon the operating results of the Operating Partnerships and ~~are~~were significantly impacted by the policies of the ~~Operating~~ Partnerships. As discussed above, Registrant adopted FIN 46(R) as of March 1, 2004. Accordingly, the balance sheets as of February 28, 2006 and 2005 and the statements of operations, partners’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended are consolidated with those of the Operating Partnerships. Prior to the adoption of FIN 46(R), the financial statements included the assets, liabilities and results of operations that relate to Registrant only and accounted for its investment in Operating Partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting, under which the investment is carried at cost and is adjusted for Registrant's share of the Operating Partnerships' results of operations and by any cash distributions received. Equity in loss of each investment in Operating Partnership allocated to Registrant was recognized to the extent of Registrant's investment balance in each Operating Partnership.

Year Ended February 28, 2007

The results of operations reported for the year ended February 28, 2007, were predominantly that of the Operating Partnerships. The Operating General Partner sold the Complex owned by the Operating Partnerships on November 14, 2006 for $69,460,000. The Operating Partnerships reported net income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 in the amount of approximately $29,654,740, which includes gain on the sale of real estate assets of $28,002,756. Since the Operating Partnerships’ assets were held for sale, depreciation of the assets was not recorded in the current period. Although interest expense increased by approximately $164,000 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, the Operating Partnerships’ results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 still benefited from the low floater mortgages. The interest rates on the low floater mortgage began January 2006 at 3.2%; prior to the sale of the Complex, the low floater rate on the mortgages was 3.54%. The average interest rate for the period was approximately 3.5%. The mortgage was paid off at the time of sale on November 14, 2006. The occupancy rate was approximately 91% on the sale date. Occupancy had decreased as the Operating General Partner ceased to lease units after the sales contract was executed consistent with the terms of the sales contract. Net income was allocated among the partners to adjust capital accounts for current and future distributions in connection with the liquidation of the Registrant.

Year Ended February 28, 2006

Although the results of operations were reported on the consolidated method during the year ended February 28, 2005, the revenues and expenses reflected were predominantly that of the Operating Partnerships. The Operating Partnerships reported net income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the amount of approximately $536,000, inclusive of depreciation and amortization of approximately $1,280,000. Although interest expense increased by approximately $307,000 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2004, the Operating Partnerships’ results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 ~~continued~~ tostill ~~benefit~~benefited from the low floater mortgages. The interest rates on the low floater mortgages began January 2005 at 1.78% and 2.36%, respectively, and ended the year at 3.54% as to the first mortgage, while the second mortgage was fully paid off in November 2005. The average interest rates for the year were approximately 2.39% and 3.11%, respectively. The Operating Partnerships incurred a deficit after required debt service payments and required replacement reserve deposits of approximately $716,000 during 2005, which ~~considers~~includes payments to the principal reserve fund under the mortgages (approximately $530,000), deposits to the restricted replacement reserve held by the lender (approximately $76,000), capital expenditures (approximately $1,946,000) and withdrawals of approximately $221,000 from the replacement reserve during 2005. In addition, the Operating Partnerships deposited approximately $366,000 into a non-restrictive replacement reserve which is held by the Operating Partnerships. As of December 31, 2005, the occupancy rate was approximately 99%.

Although the results of operations have continued to generate cash flow (primarily due to favorable interest rates), management continues to examine methods to maintain occupancy rates by adjusting rental rates and to closely manage operating costs. As of December 31, 2005, the occupancy rate was approximately 99%. The future operating results of the Complex will be extremely dependent on market, the regional economy and the low floater interest rates (which were higher than 2004 but still favorable in 2005), and therefore may be subject to significant volatility. There can be no assurance that the Operating Partnerships will continue to generate cash flow at the level reported in 2005.

Year Ended February 28, 2005

Although the results of operations were reported on the consolidated method during the year ended February 28, 2005, the revenues and expenses reflected were predominantly that of the Operating Partnerships. The Operating Partnerships reported net income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 in the amount of approximately $419,000, inclusive of depreciation and amortization of approximately $1,663,000. The Operating Partnerships generated cash flow after required debt service payments and required replacement reserve deposits of approximately $393,000 during 2004, which ~~considers~~includes payments to the principal reserve fund under the mortgages (approximately $439,000), deposits to the restricted replacement reserve held by the lender (approximately $76,000), capital expenditures (approximately $1,341,000) and withdrawals of approximately $207,000 from the replacement reserve during 2004. In addition, the Operating Partnerships deposited approximately $355,000 into a non-restrictive replacement reserve which is held by the Operating Partnerships. Although interest expense increased by approximately $60,000 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, the Operating Partnerships’ results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 benefited significantly from the low floater mortgages. The interest rates on the low floater mortgages began January 2004 at 1.06% and 1.11%, respectively, and ended the year at 1.58% and 2.09%, respectively. The average interest rates for the year were approximately 1.18% and 1.40%, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the occupancy rate was approximately 98%.

Year Ended February 29, 2004

During the year ended February 29, 2004, Registrant earned interest of approximately $900. Registrant's operating expenses were higher compared to the year ended February 28, 2003 primarily as a result of legal costs (discussed above).

The Operating Partnerships reported net income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 in the amount of approximately $418,000, inclusive of depreciation and amortization of approximately $1,583,000. The Operating Partnerships generated cash flow after required debt service payments and required replacement reserve deposits of approximately $1,046,000 during 2003, which considers payments to the principal reserve fund under the mortgages (approximately $402,000), net deposits to the replacement reserve (approximately $76,000) and capital expenditures (approximately $472,000), but does not include costs incurred in connection with the planned capital improvements to be covered by the Capital Improvements Escrow (discussed above) and interest earned on the Capital Improvements Escrow (approximately $39,000). In addition, the Operating Partnerships deposited approximately $355,000 into a separate replacement reserve which is held by the Operating Partnerships. The Operating Partnerships’ results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 were significantly enhanced by the low floater mortgages, as interest expense declined by approximately $88,000 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. The interest rates on the low floater mortgages began January 2003 at 1.10% and 1.39%, respectively, and ended the year at 1.06% and 1.11%, respectively. The average interest rates for the year were approximately 1.03% and 1.24%, respectively. The Operating Partnerships utilized approximately $72,000 from the replacement reserve during 2003. As of December 31, 2003, the occupancy rate was approximately 98%.

Inflation

Other than as discussed in Item 7A below, inflation is not expected to have a material adverse impact on Registrant’s results of operations.

Contractual Obligations

~~In connection~~As ~~with~~of ~~the~~February ~~tax~~28, ~~exempt~~2007 ~~financing~~Registrant ofand the Operating Partnerships, ~~the Complex~~have ~~is required to rent at least 15% of~~ the ~~D.U.'s~~following incontractual the Complex to individuals or families of low or moderate income as determined under such Code Section, currently based on their income not exceeding 80% of the median income for the area as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). commitments:

~~As of February~~Investor ~~28,~~service ~~2006~~fees ~~and~~are ~~December~~payable ~~31,~~to ~~2005,~~an ~~Registrant~~affiliate ~~and~~of the ~~Operating Partnerships~~General ~~have~~Partner in the ~~following~~amount ~~contractual~~of ~~commitments:~~$22,633.

8Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Payments due by period:

	Total		< 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		> 5 Years
Long-term debt: First mortgage (1)	$	26,435,000	$	429,334	$	952,906	$	1,093,967	$	23,958,793
Other Long-term Liabilities:
Advances payable to general partner (2)		1,538,378		1,538,378		--		--		--
Investor service fees (3)		536,929		536,929		--		--		--
Total	$	28,510,307	$	2,504,641	$	952,906	$	1,093,967	$	23,958,793

(1) Under the terms of the first mortgage, payments are made to a principal reserve; however, such payments are not credited against the unpaid principal balance of the first mortgage until the date on which bonds in the like amount are redeemed or defeased pursuant to the terms of the indenture. The amounts reflected above do not consider the payments to the principal reserve of $34,458.

(2) Advances payable to the Operating General Partner are payable from sale or refinancing proceeds of the Complex. Since the sale of the Complex is currently scheduled to occur during July 2006 pursuant to the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, such amount is presented herein as payable within one year.

(3) Investor service fees are payable to an affiliate of the General Partner and are considered due within one year.

Off - Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no recent accounting pronouncements that would have a significant impact on Registrant.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires Registrant to make certain estimates and assumptions. A summary of significant accounting policies is provided in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The following section is a summary of certain aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of Registrant’s financial condition and results of operations. Registrant believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the consolidated financial statements.

Registrant records its real estate assets at cost less accumulated depreciation and, if there are indications that impairment exists, adjusts the carrying value of those assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." See discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources above regarding the ~~possible~~ disposition of the Complex owned by the Operating Partnerships. Under SFAS No. 144, the long-lived assets of the Operating Partnerships are classified as held for sale as of October 5, 2005 and are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Once classified as held for sale, depreciation of the assets ceases. ~~The accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended February 28, 2006 includes approximately nine months of depreciation (through October 5, 2006).~~

Effective March 15, 2005, the Registrant adopted ~~FIN~~Statement 46of Financial Accounting Standard (R“SFAS”) ~~effective~~No. ~~March~~133, 1“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” ~~2004~~as amended. The ~~Accordingly,~~Operating Partnerships use derivatives to manage risks related to interest rate fluctuations. The interest rate cap purchased in connection with the ~~accounting~~mortgage ~~has changed~~payable ~~significantly~~is recorded at fair market value and is included in assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2006, with any change in fair market value reflected in the ~~financial~~consolidated ~~statements~~statement ~~are~~of ~~now~~operations ~~presented~~in asthe period of change. At the time of sale of the Complex, ~~consolidated~~the balance of the cap was written off and is included in the Gain on the Sale of Real Estate Assets.

Effective March 15, 2005, the Partnership adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended. The Operating Partnerships use derivatives to manage risks related to interest rate fluctuations. The interest rate cap purchased in connection with the mortgage payable is recorded at fair market value and is included in assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, , with any change in fair market value reflected in the consolidated statement of operations in the period of change.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Registrant currently has no market risk ~~sensitivity~~due ~~with regard~~ to ~~financial instruments concerning potential~~ interest rate ~~fluctuations~~exposure inas ~~connection~~the ~~with~~variable ~~the~~rate ~~low~~bonds ~~floater~~were ~~rates associated~~retired ~~with~~at the ~~Operating~~time ~~Partnerships' first mortgage as refinanced as~~ of ~~April~~ ~~28, 2000. Although an interest rate cap has been purchased, a change in~~ the ~~low-floater~~sale ~~interest rates~~ of ~~.25%~~the ~~would~~real ~~have~~estate anassets ~~annualized~~on ~~impact~~November ~~of approximately $66~~14,~~000~~ ~~on the Operating Partnerships’ results of operations~~2006.

The Operating Partnerships purchased an interest rate cap to limit risks associated with their variable rate debt only for hedging purposes and not for speculation or trading purposes. Interest rate protection agreements such as interest rate caps may be used to convert or limit the risks associated with variable rate debt such that there is a limit on the interest rate that the Operating Partnerships would incur (as disclosed in the financial statements). However, such arrangement may expose the Operating Partnerships to additional risks. Although the management of the Operating Partnerships selected a reputable provider for such interest rate cap, this does not eliminate the risk that such provider may fail to honor its obligations if so required. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate the Operating Partnerships from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. In addition, hedging agreements may involve costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if the Operating Partnerships terminate them. Any failure by the Operating Partnerships to effectively manage their exposure to interest rate risk through hedging agreements or otherwise, and any costs associated with such hedging arrangements could adversely affect the Operating Partnerships’ results of operations or financial condition. This could cause the market value of the Partnership’s Units to decline.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial information required in response to the Item 8 is submitted as part of Item 15.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On December 3, 2004, Registrant was informed that Rosenberg Neuwirth and Kuchner, Certified Public Accounts, P.C. (“RNK”) resigned as the Registrant’s principal independent accountants. RNK resigned because it became economically infeasible for RNK to service one public company. During Registrant’s fiscal years ended February 29 2004 and February 28, 2003, and the subsequent interim period through December 1, 2004, there were no disagreements with RNK on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RNK, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report on the financial statements for that period, nor have there been any reportable events as defined under Item 304 (a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K during such period. Effective as of April 13, 2005, Registrant engaged the firm of Reznick Group, P.C. as its independent accountants.

There were no disagreements with Reznick Group, P.C.

Item 9a. Controls and Procedures

As of February 28, ~~2006~~2007, under the direction and participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, Registrant evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner concluded that ~~(i)~~as of February 28, 2007, the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective asto ofensure that ~~February~~material ~~28,~~information ~~2006, and (ii)~~required ~~there~~to ~~has~~be ~~been no change~~ disclosed in the Registrant’s ~~internal~~periodic ~~control~~report ~~over~~filings ~~financial reporting~~with ~~during~~the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as of and for the ~~quarter~~year ended February 28, ~~2006~~2007, ~~that~~consistent ~~has~~with ~~materially affected,~~the ordefinition isof ~~reasonably~~“disclosure ~~likely~~controls toand ~~materially~~procedures” ~~affect,~~under ~~such~~the ~~internal~~Security ~~controls over~~Exchange ~~financial~~Act ~~reporting~~of 1934.

The accounting for the sale of the Operating Partnerships and the wind down, dissolution and final accounting of Registrant’s operations took longer than anticipated. In addition, there was significant turnover within the accounting department of the General Partner of Registrant which also contributed to the delay.

Once the accounting noted above was completed, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Registrant believe that the material information required to be disclosed in Registrant’s periodic report filings with SEC is effectively recorded, processed, summarized and reported, albeit not in a timely manner. Registrant is in its final stage of closing out its affairs and has filed a Form 15 with SEC.

Item 9b. Other Information

Pursuant to oral communications with the SEC, it has been requested that Registrant amend its Form 10-Q as of and for the period ended November 30, 2004 to reflect Registrant’s adoption of FIN 46(R) and thereby consolidate the accounts and activities of the Operating Partnerships with those of Registrant. In addition, the Forms 10-Q as of and for the periods ended May 31, 2005 and August 31, 2005 will include a restatement of the 2004 amounts to reflect the adoption of FIN 46(R) effective March 1, 2004.None

108

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Registrant has no directors or executive officers.

The General Partner was incorporated in Delaware on November 24, 1986. As described below, its principals have had significant experience in various facets of the real estate business including the development of multi-family rental housing. The directors and officers of the General Partner, who have served as such since inception and who shall hold office until a successor is elected and qualified, are as follows:

~~Name~~	~~Age~~Name	~~Office~~Age	Office
~~Richard Paul Richman~~	58Richard Paul Richman	~~President and Director~~64	President and Director
~~Robert H. Wilder, Jr.~~	60Robert H. Wilder, Jr.	~~Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Director~~66	Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Director
Neal Ludeke	47	Treasurer
	James Hussey	50	Treasurer

Richard Paul Richman is President and a Director of WRHC. Mr. Richman graduated from the Columbia University Law School with a Juris Doctor degree, the Columbia University Graduate School of Business Administration with a Master of Business Administration degree and Syracuse University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science. Mr. Richman has over ten years of extensive experience in both the development and management of residential properties. From 1973 until 1979, Mr. Richman practiced corporate law in New York City with the law firm of Greenbaum, Wolff & Ernst and then as a partner of Shipley, Richman & Nierenberg. For over six years, Mr. Richman acted as a lawyer in connection with the development, syndication and tax issues relating to real estate. Since 1988, Mr. Richman has been the President and/or Chairman and a stockholder of The Richman Group, Inc. (“Richman Group”). In recent years, Mr. Richman has devoted full time to the syndication and development of real estate. Mr. Richman was a vice president and shareholder of Related Housing Companies Incorporated, New York, New York from 1978 until mid-1979 with responsibility for that company's project acquisition and syndication activities. Mr. Richman has been a member of the National Advisory Board of the Housing and Development Reporter, a bi-weekly publication of the Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., a frequent speaker on real estate syndication, and a member of the New York State Historic Credit Task Force, the National Leased Housing Association, the Coalition to Preserve the Low-Income Tax Credit and the Minority Developer Assistance Corporation (which was established by the New York State Battery Park Commission).

Robert H. Wilder, Jr. is Vice President, Assistant Secretary and a Director of WRHC. Mr. Wilder graduated from the University of Michigan with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business with a Master of Business Administration degree. After graduation in 1968, Mr. Wilder joined James D. Landauer Associates, Inc., a national real estate consulting firm, where his account responsibilities included feasibility studies, market analyses, land use studies, portfolio valuations and appraisals of industrial, office, commercial and multi-family properties. From 1973 until mid-1979, Mr. Wilder was executive vice president and shareholder of Related Housing Companies Incorporated, New York, New York, and was responsible for mortgage financing and construction loan placement and the supervision of the development of the company's projects. Since 1988, Mr. Wilder has been the President and sole shareholder of Wilder Property Companies Inc. Mr. Wilder is also a licensed real estate broker in New York and Connecticut.

~~Neal Ludeke~~James isHussey ~~the~~has ~~Treasurer~~served ofas ~~WRHC.~~the ~~Mr.~~Chief ~~Ludeke,~~Financial ~~employed~~Officer by(Treasurer) ~~Richman~~of ~~Group~~WRRC since ~~November~~ ~~1986,~~January is2009. Mr. Hussey, the Treasurer of Richman Group, ~~and~~ is engaged primarily in the syndication, ~~asset management~~ and finance operations of Richman Group. In addition, Mr. ~~Ludeke~~Hussey is a Vice President and the Treasurer of Richman Asset Management, Inc. (“RAM”), an affiliate of the ~~WRHC.~~WRRC General Partner. Mr. ~~Ludeke'~~Hussey’s ~~responsibilities~~ is engaged primarily in ~~connection~~the ~~with~~partnership management and finance operations of RAM. Prior ~~include~~to ~~various~~joining ~~partnership~~RAM, ~~management~~Mr. Hussey, a Certified Public Accountant, was the Chief Financial Officer of WCI Communities Inc. NE Region and Spectrum Communities, LLC. From ~~functions~~1989 to 1998, Mr. Hussey held various positions with Center Development Corp, a developer of affordable housing in the New York metropolitan area. Mr. Hussey received a Bachelor of Science degree from SUNY at Albany in 1983 and an MBA from Columbia Business School in 1994.

Registrant is not aware of any family relationship between any directors and executive officers noted herein Item 10.

Registrant is not aware of the involvement in certain legal proceedings with respect to the directors and executive officers noted herein

Item 10.

The audit committee of the Registrant consists of Mr. Richman, Mr. ~~Ludeke~~Hussey and Charles Krafnick, Assistant Treasurer of WRHC. Mr. Richman is deemed to be an audit committee financial expert and is not independent of the Registrant.The Board of Directors of WRHC has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers of the Registrant, applicable to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and comptroller or principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions. Registrant will provide to any person without charge a copy of such code of ethics upon written request to the General Partner at 340 Pemberwick Road, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831, Attention: Secretary.

The Board of Directors of WRHC has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers of the Registrant, applicable to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and comptroller or principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions. Registrant will provide to any person without charge a copy of such code of ethics upon written request to the General Partner at 340 Pemberwick Road, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831, Attention: Secretary.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Registrant is not required to pay the officers, directors or partners of the General Partner any direct compensation, and no such compensation was paid during the year ended February 28, 2006 or during the two prior fiscal years.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

As of February 28, 2007, Dixon Mill Investor, LLC ("DMI"), an affiliate of the Operating General Partner, having the address of 350 Veterans Boulevard, Rutherford, New Jersey 07070, ~~owns~~owned ~~143~~ 144 Units, representing approximately ~~17.9~~18% of the outstanding Units of limited partnership interest.

As of February 28,2007, Affiliates of Everest Properties, Inc., having the address of 199 S. Robles Avenue, Suite 200, Pasadena, California 91101, are the owners of approximately ~~248~~246.75 Units, representing approximately 3130.8% of the outstanding units of limited partnership interest.

As of ~~May 31~~February 28, ~~2006~~2007, no person or entity other than those identified herein Item 12 was known by Registrant to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Units.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The financial interests in Registrant of the General Partner and Special Limited Partner are set forth under the heading "PROFITS, LOSSES and DISTRIBUTIONS" at pages 117 - 124 of the Prospectus.

Transactions with Affiliates of Management

The General Partner and certain of its affiliates are entitled to receive certain compensation, fees and reimbursement of expenses during the offering, operational and termination or refinancing stages of Registrant.

WRMC, Inc. ("WRMC"), an affiliate of the General Partner, iswas a co-management agent of the Complex. In connection with these services, WRMC earned ~~$111,822~~ and received management fees of $~~113~~104,~~034~~941 in calendar ~~2005~~2006.

Richman Asset Management, Inc. an affiliate of the General Partner, earned compensation in the amount of $9862,~~314~~481 in fiscal ~~2006~~2007 for its performance in connection with investor services for Registrant and the Operating Partnerships and received payment of $60580,~~000.~~695 of accrued and unpaid fees.

Indebtedness of Management

No officer or director of the General Partner or any affiliate of the foregoing was indebted to Registrant at any time during the years ended February 28, ~~2006~~ 2007 and ~~2005~~ 2006.

1210

Corporate Governance

As discussed elsewhere in this annual report, Registrant does not have any directors, although as noted above Mr. Richman, Mr. Wilder and Mr. Hussey serve on a committee that performs the functions of an audit committee on behalf of Registrant. Under Nasdaq Stock Market independence standards, Mr. Richman, Mr. Wilder and Mr. Hussey would not be considered independent as they serve as officers of the General Partner. Although Mr. Richman, Mr. Wilder and Mr. Hussey are not independent under Nasdaq rules, Registrant believes that each exercises his judgment in the best interest of Registrant with respect to matters that would ordinarily be passed upon by an audit committee. Registrant is not a listed issuer whose securities are listed on a national securities exchange, or an inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be independent, and Registrant is not required to have an audit committee which consists of independent directors and meets the other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm billed Registrant the following fees for professional services rendered in the years ended February 28, ~~2006~~ 2007 and ~~2005~~ 2006:

	2006		2005
	2007			2006
Audit Fees	$	34,500	$	~~25,000~~$	34,500
Audit-Related Fees		--		--	--
Tax Fees		--		--	--
All Other Fees		--		--	--

Audit fees consist of fees for the annual audit and review of Registrant’s financial statements and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. Tax fees generally represent fees for annual tax return preparation. and are included in the Audit Fees listed above.. There were no other accounting fees incurred by Registrant in fiscal ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~ 2006.

The audit committee has adopted a set of pre-approval policies and procedures under which, pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm require pre-approval by the audit committee.

The audit committee approved all fiscal ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 audit fees.

1311

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(1) Financial Statements

(1)	Financial Statements

	(i)	The list of Financial Statements of Registrant appears on page F-1.

	(ii)	The list of Financial Statements of the Operating Partnerships appears on page F-15.

(2)	Financial Statement Schedules

	All schedules are omitted because the required information is inapplicable or it is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

(3)	Exhibits

(i) The list of Financial Statements of Registrant appears on page F-1.

	(3A)	Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on October 15, 1987;*

	(3B)	Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. (attached to Prospectus as Exhibit A);

	(4)	Form of Subscription Agreement (attached to Prospectus as Exhibit B);

	(10A)	Previously executed and filed Certificate of Limited Partnership and Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of (x) Dixon Mill Associates I (Phase One), Limited Partnership, (y) Dixon Mill Associates II (Phase Two), Limited Partnership and (z) Dixon Mill Associates III (Phase Three), Limited Partnership;*

	(10B)	Form of Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Dixon Mill Partnerships:

		(1) Dixon Mill Associates I (Phase One), Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership;**

		(2) Dixon Mill Associates II (Phase Two), Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership;** and

		(3) Dixon Mill Associates III (Phase Three), Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership;**

	(10C)	Dixon Mill Complex Financing Documents;*

	(10D)	Administrative Consent Order with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP") and NJDEP Non-Applicability Letter as to Dixon Mill Partnerships;*

	(10E)	Master Services Agreement, dated June 18, 1986, between Varick Construction Corp. and IT Corporation;*

	(10F)	Documents related to Dixon Mill Complex historic certification;*

	(10G)	Form of Operating Deficit Guarantee Agreement;*

	(10H)	Form of Repurchase Agreement;**

	(10I)	Form of Investor Services Agreement;**

	(10J)	Form of Escrow Agreement among Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., Wilder Richman Historic Corporation, Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc. and FirsTier Bank, N.A., as escrow agent;**

~~(ii) The list of Financial Statements of the Operating Partnerships appears on page F-15.~~12

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

	(10K)	Form of Financial Development Consulting Agreement between Wilder Richman Corporation and the Operating Partnerships;**

	(10L)	Form of Annuity Issuance Agreement between Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. and the Issuer;**

	(10M)	Form of Guaranteed Investment Contract Escrow Agreement among Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., the Dixon Mill Partnerships and the escrow agent;**

	(10N)	Form of Assignment between the Dixon Mill Partnership, as Assignor, and Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., as Assignee;**

	(10O)	Form of Letter from The Dixon Venture to Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. and the Dixon Mill Partnerships, as to The Dixon Venture's agreement to bear all costs of compliance with the New Jersey Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act;**

	(10P)	Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership; ***

	(10Q)	Reinstatement and Modification Agreement; ***

	(10R)	Operating Deficit Escrow Agreement; ***

	(10S)	Priority Operating Deficit Escrow Agreement; ***

	(10T)	Amended and Restated Achievement Escrow Agreement; ***

	(10U)	Default Avoiding Loan Agreement; ***

	(10V)	Management Agreement; ***

	(10W)	Chase Note; ***

	(10X)	Letter of Intent to Reinstate and Modify the Mortgages; ****

	(10Y)	Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as of April 3, 2006 between the Operating Partnerships and RMPC Dixon LLC*****

	(31.1)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer;

	(31.2)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer;

	(32.1)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer;

	(32.2)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

All schedules are omitted because the required information is inapplicable or it is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

	*	Incorporated by Reference to Registrant's Form S-11 Registration Statement as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 1988.
	**	Incorporated by Reference to Amendment No.1 to Registrant's Form S-11 Registration Statement as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 1988.
	***	Submitted as exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 1992.
	****	Incorporated by Reference to Proxy dated March 23, 1992.
	*****	Incorporated by Reference to Form 8-K dated June 23, 2006 and Form 8-K dated November 8, 2006.

~~(3) Exhibits~~13

(3A) Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on October 15, 1987;*

(3B) Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. (attached to Prospectus as Exhibit A);

(4) Form of Subscription Agreement (attached to Prospectus as Exhibit B);

(10A) Previously executed and filed Certificate of Limited Partnership and Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of (x) Dixon Mill Associates I (Phase One), Limited Partnership, (y) Dixon Mill Associates II (Phase Two), Limited Partnership and (z) Dixon Mill Associates III (Phase Three), Limited Partnership;*

(10B) Form of Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Dixon Mill Partnerships:

(1) Dixon Mill Associates I (Phase One), Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership;**

(2) Dixon Mill Associates II (Phase Two), Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership;** and

(3) Dixon Mill Associates III (Phase Three), Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership;**

(10C) Dixon Mill Complex Financing Documents;*

(10D) Administrative Consent Order with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP") and NJDEP Non-Applicability Letter as to Dixon Mill Partnerships;*

(10E) Master Services Agreement, dated June 18, 1986, between Varick Construction Corp. and IT Corporation;*

(10F) Documents related to Dixon Mill Complex historic certification;*

(10G) Form of Operating Deficit Guarantee Agreement;*

(10H) Form of Repurchase Agreement;**

(10I) Form of Investor Services Agreement;**

(10J) Form of Escrow Agreement among Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., Wilder Richman Historic Corporation, Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc. and FirsTier Bank, N.A., as escrow agent;**

(10K) Form of Financial Development Consulting Agreement between Wilder Richman Corporation and the Operating Partnerships;**

(10L) Form of Annuity Issuance Agreement between Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. and the Issuer;**

(10M) Form of Guaranteed Investment Contract Escrow Agreement among Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., the Dixon Mill Partnerships and the escrow agent;**

(10N) Form of Assignment between the Dixon Mill Partnership, as Assignor, and Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P., as Assignee;**

(10O) Form of Letter from The Dixon Venture to Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. and the Dixon Mill Partnerships, as to The Dixon Venture's agreement to bear all costs of compliance with the New Jersey Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act;**

(10P) Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership; ***

(10Q) Reinstatement and Modification Agreement; ***

(10R) Operating Deficit Escrow Agreement; ***

(10S) Priority Operating Deficit Escrow Agreement; ***

(10T) Amended and Restated Achievement Escrow Agreement; ***

(10U) Default Avoiding Loan Agreement; ***

(10V) Management Agreement; ***

(10W) Chase Note; ***

(10X) Letter of Intent to Reinstate and Modify the Mortgages; ****

(21) Dixon Mills Associates Combined Audited Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and Independent Auditors’ Report;

(31.1) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer;

(31.2) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer;

(32.1) Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer;

(32.2) Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

* Incorporated by Reference to Registrant's Form S-11 Registration Statement as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 1988.

** Incorporated by Reference to Amendment No.1 to Registrant's Form S-11 Registration Statement as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 1988.

*** Submitted as exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 1992.

**** Incorporated by Reference to Proxy dated March 23, 1992.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the ~~require-ments~~requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized on the ~~22nd~~13th day of ~~June~~September, ~~2006~~2011.

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. By: Wilder Richman Historic Corporation, General Partner By: /s/Richard Paul Richman Richard Paul Richman - Chief Executive Officer and Director By: /s/James Hussey James Hussey - Chief Financial Officer and Director

~~By: Wilder Richman Historic Corporation, General Partner~~14

By: /s/Richard Paul Richman

Richard Paul Richman - Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/Neal Ludeke

Neal Ludeke - Chief Financial Officer

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSISIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table of Contents	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-3
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-43
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-54
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity (Deficit)	F-76
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-87
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-109

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners

Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of February 28, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006, and the related consolidated ~~statement~~statements of operations, partners’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ~~then~~ ended. February 28, 2007, 2006 and 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audits~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the General Partner, as well as evaluating overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Wilder Richman Historic II, L.P. and Subsidiaries as of February 28, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ~~then~~ ended February 28, 2007, 2006 and 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership changed its method of accounting for its investment in Operating Partnerships effective March 1, 2004 with the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46 (revised).

/s/ Reznick Group, P.C.

Bethesda, Maryland

~~June 20~~September 13, ~~2006~~ 2011

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Partners

Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P.

Greenwich, Connecticut

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. as of February 29, 2004 and February 28, 2003, and the related statements of operations, partners' equity and cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2004, February 28, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. as of February 29, 2004 and February 28, 2003 and the results of its operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years ended February 29, 2004, February 28, 2003 and 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Rosenberg, Neuwirth & Kuchner

Certified Public Accountants, P.C.

April 28, 2004

New York, New York

F-3

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	February 28,		~~February 28,~~	February 28,
	2006		2005
	2007			2006
ASSETS
Land	$		$	$ 1,150,473
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,072,299		$	4,184,690
Building and improvements, net of accumulated
Mortgage escrows and other deposits					1,184,280
depreciation of $21,427,397				35,349,870
JCRA escrow		2,000,000
Cash and cash equivalents		4,184,690		5,909,227
Assets held for sale					39,371,221
Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $133,650				757,339
Other assets					57,270
Mortgage escrows and other deposits		1,181,280		3,285,704
	$	8,072,299		$	44,794,461
Tenant security deposits				687,480
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ EQUITY
Assets held for sale		39,371,221
LIABILITIES
Other assets		57,270		32,706
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	160,512		$	385,789
	$	44,794,461	$	47,172,799
Accrued interest payable					40,775
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ EQUITY
State of New Jersey filing fee payable					25,600
LIABILITIES
Liabilities held for sale					27,178,813
Mortgages payable			$	$ 28,600,000
Due to affiliates		22,633			2,075,307
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		385,789		440,761
		183,145			29,706,284
Accrued interest payable		40,775		22,073
MINORITY INTEREST		1,682,318			14,601,428
Tenant security deposits payable				687,480
PARTNERS’ EQUITY		6,206,836			486,749
State of New Jersey filing fee payable		25,600		56,100
	$	8,072,299		$	44,794,461
Liabilities held for sale		27,178,813
Due to affiliates		2,075,307		1,979,482
		29,706,284		31,785,896
MINORITY INTEREST		14,601,428		14,596,070
PARTNERS’ EQUITY		486,749		790,833
	$	44,794,461	$	47,172,799

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-43

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P.AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Year Ended
	February 28,			~~February 28,~~	February 28,		~~February 29,~~		February 28,
	2006			2005			2004
	2007				2006				2005
OPERATIONS
Revenue
Interest	$	~~194~~503,~~320~~628		$	~~56,265~~$	194,320	$	~~918~~	$	56,265
Expenses
Administrative		68165,~~318~~061			~~141,628~~	68,318		~~167,913~~		141,628
Investor service fees - affiliate		2422,~~765~~633			~~24,100~~	24,765		~~24,084~~		24,100
State of New Jersey Filing Fee		6826,~~500~~075			~~112,200~~	68,500		~~112,200~~		112,200
TOTAL EXPENSES		~~161~~213,~~583~~769			~~277,928~~	161,583		~~304,197~~		277,928
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		32289,~~737~~859			~~(221,663~~	)32,737		~~(303,279~~	)	(221,663	)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Revenue
Rent		6,~~999~~041,~~873~~019			~~6,812,091~~	6,999,873				6,812,091
Equity in income of operating partnerships		- --			--			413,727
Expenses
Total revenue from discontinued operations		6,999,873			6,812,091			413,727
Administrative		1,132,113				1,330,096				1,186,879
Expenses
Operating		2,519,776				2,985,059				2,873,378
Administrative		1,330,096			1,186,879
Management fees - affiliate		262,353				279,554				257,334
Operating		2,985,059			2,873,378
Investor services fees - affiliate		39,848				73,549				71,614
Management fees - affiliate		279,554			257,334
Financial		867,213				702,740				395,654
Investor services fees - affiliate		73,549			71,614
Depreciation and amortization		29,700				1,280,338				1,663,256
Financial		702,740			395,654
Total expenses from discontinued operations		4,851,003				6,651,336				6,448,115
Depreciation and amortization		1,280,338			1,663,256
OTHER INCOME
Total expenses from discontinued operations		6,651,336			6,448,115
Gain on sale of real estate assets		28,002,756
Income from discontinued operations
before minority interest		~~348~~29,~~537~~192,772			~~363,976~~	348,537		~~413,727~~		363,976
Minority interest income of operating partnerships		(5,358	)		(4,188	)		--
Minority interest (income) loss of operating partnerships		7,681,456				(5,358	)			(4,188	)
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS		~~343~~36,~~179~~874,228			~~359,788~~	343,179		~~413,727~~		359,788
NET INCOME	$	~~375~~37,~~916~~164,087		$	~~138,125~~$	375,916	$	~~110,448~~	$	138,125
NET INCOME ALLOCATED TO
Limited partners	$	~~372~~36,~~157~~792,446		$	~~136,744~~$	372,157	$	~~109,344~~	$	136,744
General partner		3371,~~759~~641			~~1,381~~	3,759		~~1,104~~		1,381
	$	~~375~~37,~~916~~164,087		$	~~138,125~~$	375,916	$	~~110,448~~	$	138,125

-- continued -–

F-54

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P.AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - CONTINUED

	Year Ended
	February 28,		~~February 28,~~	February 28,		~~February 29,~~		February 28,
	2006		2005			2004
	2007			2006				2005
NET INCOME ALLOCATED PER UNIT OF
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST	$	465.20	$	170.93		$	136.68
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST (800
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST)	$	45,990.58		$	465.20			$	170.93
OPERATIONS ALLOCATED PER UNIT
NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST	$	40.51	$	(274.31	)	$	(375.31	)
OPERATIONS ALLOCATED PER UNIT
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED
OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST	$	358.70		$	40.51			$	(274.31	)
OPERATIONS ALLOCATED PER UNIT
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED
OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST	$	424.68	$	445.24		$	511.99
OPERATIONS ALLOCATED PER UNIT
OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST	$	45,631.86		$	424.68			$	445.24

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-65

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ EQUITY (~~DEFICIT~~DEFICT)

YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

	General			~~Limited~~	Limited
	Partner			~~Partners~~	Partners		~~Total~~		Total
Partners’ equity (deficit), February 28, 2003	$	(134,538	)	$	2,347,691		$	2,213,153
Partner’s equity (deficit), February 29, 2004		(144,143	)			1,396,863				1,252,720
Distributions to partners		~~(10,709~~	)		~~(1,060,172~~	)(600,012	)	~~(1,070,881~~	)	(600,012	)
Net income, year ended February 29, 2004		1,104			109,344			110,448
Net income, year ended February 28, 2005		1,381				136,744				138,125
Partner’s equity (deficit), February 29, 2004		(144,143	)		1,396,863			1,252,720
Partner’s equity (deficit), February 28, 2005		(142,762	)			933,595				790,833
Distributions to partners					~~(600,012~~	)(680,000	)	~~(600,012~~	)	(680,000	)
Net income, year ended February 28, 2005		1,381			136,744			138,125
Net income, year ended February 28, 2006		3,759				372,157				375,916
Partner’s equity (deficit), February 28, 2005		(142,762	)		933,595			790,833
Partners’ equity (deficit), February 28, 2006		(139,003	)			625,752				486,749
Distributions to partners					~~(680,000~~	)(31,444,000	)	~~(680,000~~	)	(31,444,000	)
Net income, year ended February 28, 2006		3,759			372,157			375,916
Net income year ended February 28, 2007		371,641				36,792,446				37,164,087
Partners’ equity (deficit), February 28, 2006	$	(139,003	)	$	625,752		$	486,749
Partners’ equity February 28, 2007	$	232,638			$	5,974,198			$	6,206,836
Limited partnership units outstanding		~~800~~			~~800~~	800		~~800~~

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-76

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Year Ended
	February 28,			~~February 28,~~	February 28,		~~February 29,~~		February 28,
	2006			2005			2004
	2007				2006				2005
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	~~375~~37,~~916~~164,087		$	~~138,125~~$	375,916	$	~~110,148~~	$	138,125
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
provided by (used in) operating activities
Gain on sale of real estate assets		(28,002,756	)
Depreciation and amortization		129,~~280,338~~700			~~1,663,256~~	1,280,338				1,663,256
Minority interest in income of operating partnerships		5,358			4,188
Minority interest income (loss) in income of operating partnerships		(7,681,456	)			5,358				4,188
Unrealized gain on interest rate cap		~~(65,846~~	)			(65,846	)
Write off of unamortized interest rate cap		113,891
Write off of interest rate cap						113,891
Equity in income of operating partnerships								(413,727	)
Adjustment of current assets and liabilities at time of sale of real estate assets		(156,221	)
Decrease (increase) in tenant security deposits		~~(56~~743,~~333~~813	)		~~24,013~~	(56,333	)			24,013
Decrease (increase) in other assets		(24,564	)		13,220			59
Increase in JCRA escrow		(2,000,000	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(54,972	)		829			111,750
Decrease (increase) in other assets		57,270				(24,564	)			13,220
Increase in accrued interest payable		18,702			8,319
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(225,277	)			(54,972	)			829
Increase (decrease) in tenant security deposits payable		56,333			(24,013	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		(40,775	)			18,702				8,319
Decrease in State of New Jersey filing fee payable		(30,500	)					(56,100	)
Increase (decrease) in tenant security deposits payable		(743,813	)			56,333				(24,013	)
Increase in due to affiliates		95,825			48,389			9,084
Decrease in State of New Jersey filing fee payable		(25,600	)			(30,500	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		1,714,148			1,876,326			(238,486	)
Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates		(1,143,574	)			95,825				48,389
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(2,024,602	)			1,714,148				1,876,326
Investment in fixed assets		(1,946,032	)		(1,341,243	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Withdrawals from (payments to) principal reserve fund		1,635,478			(439,174	)
Sale of real estate assets		69,460,000	)
Increase in mortgage escrows and other deposits		(143,131	)		(389,923	)
Cost of sales of real estate assets		(2,792,442	)
Net cash of consolidating subsidiaries as of beginning of year					6,788,271
Investment in fixed assets		(522,950	)			(1,946,032	)			(1,341,243	)
Distribution received								1,239,180
Withdrawals from (payments to) principal reserve fund		(19,036	)			1,635,478				(439,174	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(453,685	)		4,617,931			1,239,180
Increase (decrease) in mortgage escrows and other deposits		1,812,393				(143,131	)			(389,923	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Distributions paid to minority interest		(5,237,654	)
Principal payments on mortgages		(2,165,000	)
Net cash of consolidating subsidiaries as of beginning of year										6,788,271
Purchase of interest rate cap		(140,000	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		62,700,311				(453,685	)			4,617,931
Distributions paid		(680,000	)		(600,012	)		(1,070,881	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,985,000	)		(600,012	)		(1,070,881	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(1,724,537	)		5,894,245			(70,187	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year		5,909,227			14,982			85,169
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year	$	4,184,690		$	5,909,227		$	14,982
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Financial expenses paid	$	691,162		$	387,335		$	--

-- continued --

F-87

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED

	Year Ended
	February 28,			~~February 28,~~	February 28,		~~February 29,~~	February 28,
	2006			2005			2004
	2007				2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,746,951		$	1,830,212
Principal payments on mortgages		(26,435,000	)			(2,165,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(310,554	)	$	(1,780,417	)
Payment of loans from operating general partner and affiliates		(909,100	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(2,305,000	)
Purchase of interest rate cap						(140,000	)
Distributions paid		(31,444,000	)			(680,000	)			(600,012	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(58,788,100	)			(2,985,000	)			(600,012	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,887,609				(1,724,537	)			5,894,245
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year		4,184,690				5,909,227				14,982
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year	$	6,072,299			$	4,184,690			$	5,909,227
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Financial expenses paid	$	907,988			$	691,162			$	387,335

The amounts reflected above are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as presented on page F-8. Amounts are not included for the year ended February 29, 2004 because the Partnership accounted for its investments in subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting for such year (see Note 1).


CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(1,660,012	)	$	1,746,951		$	1,830,212

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	67,937,965		$	(310,554	)	$	(1,780,417	)

Net cash used in financing activities	$	(64,959,880	)	$	(2,305,000	)

The amounts reflected above are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as presented on page F-7 and above.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-98

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P. (the "Partnership") was formed under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act on October 15, 1987 to acquire all of the limited partnership interest in Dixon Mill Associates I (Phase One), Limited Partnership ("Dixon Mill I"), Dixon Mill Associates II (Phase Two), Limited Partnership ("Dixon Mill II") and Dixon Mill Associates III (Phase Three), Limited Partnership ("Dixon Mill III") (together herein referred to as the "Operating Partnerships") which, collectively, constructed, rehabilitated and ~~own~~owned and ~~operate~~operated a 433-unit apartment complex (the "Complex") located in Jersey City, New Jersey. In accordance with the tax exempt financing of the Complex, the Operating Partnerships are required to rent 15% to 20% of the apartment units to individuals of low or moderate income. Wilder Richman Historic Corporation (the "General Partner") is the General Partner of the Partnership. The general partner of the Operating Partnerships is Dixon Venture Corp. (“DVC”) (the "Operating General Partner"), which owns 1% of each of the Operating Partnerships.

The Partnership filed a Form S-11 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which became effective May 9, 1988, covering an offering (the "Offering") of 800 limited partnership units at $24,100 per unit. On July 15, 1988, the Partnership admitted 754 limited partners representing 800 units of limited partnership interest (the "Closing") for $19,280,000 in cash and notes. Immediately following the Closing, the Partnership acquired a 99% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnerships. The Partnership acquired its limited partnership interest for $16,388,000, which was paid in installments.

~~Through February~~The ~~29, 2004, the Investments in~~ Operating Partnerships ~~were~~sold ~~accounted for under~~ the ~~equity~~Complex ~~method~~on ofNovember ~~accounting.~~14, ~~Upon the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board~~ 2006. (~~“FASB”)~~See ~~Interpretation~~Note No9. ~~46 (revised~~), ~~Consolidation of Variable Interest Rate Entities (“FIN46 (R)”)~~However, as ofthe ~~March~~dissolution ~~1, 2004 (see Principles~~ of ~~Consolidation in Note 2 below),~~ the ~~Partnership~~Registrant iswas ~~required to consolidate~~not ~~its~~imminent ~~financial~~as ~~information with that~~ of ~~the~~February ~~Operating~~28, ~~Partnerships. Accordingly~~2007, the ~~accompanying~~consolidated financial statements asare ofpresented ~~and~~assuming ~~for~~that the ~~years ended February~~Partnership ~~28,~~will ~~2006~~continue ~~and~~as ~~2005~~a ~~are~~going ~~presented as consolidated~~concern.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

All significant inter-partnership balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Investments in Operating Partnerships

Prior to the adoption of FIN 46(R), the financial statements included the assets, liabilities and results of operations that related to the Partnership only. The Partnership accounted for its investment in the Operating Partnerships using the equity method of accounting, under which the investment was carried at cost and was adjusted by the Partnership's share of the Operating Partnerships' results of operations and by cash distributions received or accrued, which was limited to the respective investment balances. For such periods, the statements of operations included the Partnership's equity in the earnings of the Operating Partnerships on a calendar year basis.

Fiscal Year

The Partnership’s fiscal year for financial reporting purposes ends on the last day of February, while that of the Operating Partnerships ends on December 31. Both the Partnership and the Operating Partnerships have a December 31 year end for tax purposes.

F-10

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, 2006, FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

Accounts Receivable and Bad Debts

Tenant receivables are charged to bad debt expense when they are determined to be uncollectible based upon a periodic review of the accounts by management. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the allowance method be used to recognize bad debts; however, the effect of using the direct write-off method is not materially different from the results that would have been obtained under the allowance method. At the time of sale of the Complex, the tenant receivables balances were written off and are included in the Gain on the Sale of Real Estate Assets.

F-9

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, 2007, FEBRUARY 28, 2006 AND FEBRUARY 28, 2005

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Deferred Costs

Deferred costs represent costs incurred in connection with the mortgages (see Note 6) and are being amortized over the term of the respective mortgages using the straight line method. At ~~Annual~~the ~~amortization~~time ~~for~~of ~~each~~sale of the ~~next~~Complex, ~~five~~the ~~years~~balances ~~ending December 31,~~were ~~2006~~written ~~through~~off ~~December~~and ~~31,~~are ~~2010~~included isin ~~$24,853~~the Gain on the Sale of Real Estate Assets.

Derivative Instruments

Effective March 15, 2005, the Partnership adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended. The Operating Partnerships use derivatives to manage risks related to interest rate fluctuations. The interest rate cap purchased in connection with the mortgage payable (see Note 6) is recorded at fair market value and is included in assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, ~~2006~~2005 (see below under Land and Buildings and Improvements), with any change in fair market value reflected in the consolidated statement of operations in the period of change. At the time of sale of the Complex, the balance was written off and is included in the Gain on the Sale of Real Estate Assets.

Land and Buildings and Improvements

The long-lived assets of the Operating Partnerships ~~are~~have been classified as held for sale as of October 5, 2005 and ~~are~~have been measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Once classified as held for sale, depreciation of the assets ceases. Land and buildings and improvements had been carried at cost. Depreciation of buildings was computed on the straight-line method over a 40-year life. Building improvements and furniture and equipment were depreciated over an estimated service life of 5 to 40 years. As of October 5, 2005, the property was listed for sale. Therefore, deprecation has only been recorded though October 5, 2005. At the time of sale of the Complex, the balances were written off and included in the Gain on the Sale of Real Estate Assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. The Partnership does not perform a periodic assessment of assets for impairment in the absence of such information or indicators. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Partnership recognizes an impairment loss only if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its undiscounted cash flows and measures the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying ~~amount~~amounts and estimated fair value. See discussion above under Land and Buildings and Improvements regarding the long-lived assets of the Operating Partnerships being classified as held for sale as of October 5, 2005 as a result of the potential ~~disposition~~ and ultimate sale of the ~~Operating Properties~~Complex.

~~F-11~~Rental Income

Rental income is recognized for apartment rentals as they accrue. Rental payments received in advance are deferred until earned. All leases between the Operating Partnerships and tenants of the property are operating leases.

F-10

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Rental Income

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Partnership and the Operating Partnerships to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash investments in high credit quality financial institutions.

Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes has been made because all income and losses are allocated to the partners for inclusion in their respective tax returns. In accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," the Partnership has included in Note 86 disclosures related to differences in the book and tax bases of accounting. The partners of the Operating Partnerships were entitled to a 25% historic rehabilitation tax credit on eligible costs as a reduction of their tax liabilities. The tax basis of the property was reduced by one-half of the historic rehabilitation tax credit.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Reclassifications~~Other Comprehensive Income

~~Certain prior~~The ~~year~~Partnership ~~amounts~~has ~~have~~no ~~been~~items ~~reclassified~~of toother ~~conform~~comprehensive toincome for any of the ~~current~~periods ~~year presentation~~presented.

3.Allocation ~~DISCONTINUED~~of ~~OPERATIONS~~Partnership Income/(Loss)

~~The Operating~~Partnership ~~Partnerships~~net ~~received~~income/(loss) ~~a written offer effective May 24, 2006 from a non-affiliated third party to purchase the property for $69,960,000. The offer~~ is ~~subject~~allocated to ~~various terms and conditions and is subject to termination; accordingly, there is no assurance that such sale will ultimately take place. However,~~ the ~~purchase~~Partners ~~price~~in ~~includes~~accordance awith ~~nonrefundable deposit of $4,390,000 and~~ the ~~sale~~Partnership’s isAgreement ~~expected to close by July 14, 2006. The following represents the detail~~ of ~~the~~Limited assets and liabilities that are classified as discontinued operations as a result of certain assets and liabilities of the Operating Partnerships being classified as held for sale as of October 5, 2005 (see Note 2):Partnership.

~~F-12~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no recent accounting pronouncements that would have a significant impact on the Registrant.

3. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

DVC has complete authority, management and control of the Operating Partnerships. The Partnership and the Operating Partnerships, in the normal course of business, have transactions with affiliates. Due to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets is comprised of the following items as of February 28, 2007 and 2006:


	2007		2006

Due to (from)

Morris Realty	$	-	$	(5,259	)
DVC		-		1,543,637
Richman Asset Management, Inc.		22,633		536,929
	$	22,633	$	2,075,307

The Operating Partnerships incurred property management fees to WRMC, Inc., an affiliate of the Partnership, in the amount of $104,941 and $111,822 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, property management fees of $157,412 and $167,732 were incurred in 2006 and 2005, respectively, to Morris Property Management, an affiliate of the Operating General Partner.

F-11

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

3. TRANSACTIONS ~~DISCONTINUED~~WITH ~~OPERATIONS~~AFFILIATES (- CONTINUED)

Assets
Land	$	1,150,473
Buildings and improvements, net of
accumulated depreciation of $22,668,343		36,054,956
Deferred costs, net of accumulated
accumulated amortization of $141,541		809,902
Mortgage escrow deposits		612,077
Tenant security deposits		743,813
	$	39,371,221
Liabilities
Mortgage payable	$	26,435,000
Tenant security deposits payable		743,813
	$	27,178,813

Richman Asset Management, Inc. (“RAM”), an affiliate of the Partnership, provides investor services at a fee which is based upon a base amount of $60,000 in 1992 and is subject to adjustment annually thereafter based on changes in the Operating Partnerships’ rental revenue (the “Investor Services Fees”). Total Investor Services Fees incurred for 2007, 2006 and 2005 as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were of $62,481, $98,314 and $95,714, respectively. As of February 28, 2007 and 2006, due to affiliates includes $22,633 and $536,929, respectively, of Investor Services Fees due to RAM.

4Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships, DVC is entitled to interest on Operating Deficit Loans and voluntary loans made subsequent to the issuance of the Fannie Mae pass-through certificates (which occurred in February 1991). Interest ~~INVESTMENTS~~on INsuch ~~OPERATING~~advances ~~PARTNERSHIPS~~accrues at 1% above the JP Morgan Chase prime rate (9.25% and 7.25% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively). The Operating Partnerships incurred interest of $78,885and $58,722 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. DVC was repaid the loans after the sale of the Complex by the Operating Partnerships in the amount of $1,622,522 (including accrued interest of $708,164.) The amount payable to DVC was $1,543,637 (including accrued interest of $629,279) as of December 31, 2005.

The Partnership determined that the Operating Partnerships are variable interest entities as defined by FIN 46(R) (see Note 1) and concluded that, as the limited partner in such entities, it is the primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46(R) because it absorbs the majority of the expected income and loss variability (as it is entitled to a preferred return)4. MORTGAGES Accordingly, the Partnership began consolidating the accounts of the Operating Partnerships effective March 1, 2004 and the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended February 28, 2006 and 2005 reflect the adoption of FIN 46(R). The debt of the Operating Partnerships is nonrecourse and the Partnership has no obligation in connection with such debt. Upon adoption of FIN 46(R), the Partnership recorded the assets and liabilities of the Operating Partnerships at their historical bases since the Operating Partnerships are under control of the Partnership.PAYABLE

~~Prior to March~~On May 1, ~~2004~~2000, the ~~Partnership~~Jersey ~~accounted~~City ~~for~~Redevelopment ~~its~~Agency ~~investment~~(the in“Agency”) provided mortgage financing for the Operating Partnerships ~~under~~in the ~~equity~~amount ~~method~~of ~~(see~~$28,600,000 ~~Note~~for 2a term of 30 years through the issuance of (a) variable rate tax-exempt bonds in the amount of $26,435,000 maturing on May 15, 2030 (with an interest rate of 3.54% ~~Information~~at ~~related to~~the time of sale of the ~~Partnership’s~~ ~~investment~~real estate assets) and (b) variable rate taxable bonds in ~~Operating~~the ~~Partnerships~~amount ~~for~~of $2,165,000 (which matured and were paid in full on November 15, 2005 from the ~~year~~principal ~~ended~~reserve ~~February 29~~fund – see below). The tax exempt bonds were paid off at the time of sale of the Complex on November 14, ~~2004~~2006 is(see asNote ~~follows:~~9). The mortgages were secured by the Complex.

Balance, February 28, 2003	$	2,475,099
Equity in income of Operating Partnerships		413,727
Distributions		(1,239,180	)
Balance, February 29, 2004	$	1,649,646

To manage risk associated with the variable interest rates associated with the bonds, the Operating Partnerships executed an interest rate cap agreement (the “Rate Cap”) on May 15, 2005 for a cost of $140,000. Pursuant to the terms of the Rate Cap, the maximum interest rate on the mortgages is 5%. The Rate Cap was scheduled to expire on May 15, 2010. The Operating Partnerships are required to fund an escrow (in the amount of $2,333 per month, the “Pledged Cap Account”) in connection with the purchase of another interest rate cap upon the expiration of the Rate Cap in 2010. The Rate Cap, part of other deferred costs, was written off at the time of sale of the Complex.

~~In accordance~~Prior ~~with~~to the ~~limited~~sale ~~partnership agreements~~ of the ~~Operating Partnerships~~Complex, ~~income~~monthly ~~and~~payments ~~losses~~were ~~are~~made tointo bea ~~allocated~~principal 1%reserve ~~and~~fund ~~99%~~for tothe purpose of providing funds for retirement of the ~~Operating General~~tax-exempt ~~Partner~~bonds ~~and~~issued by the ~~Partnership~~Agency. As of December 31, ~~respectively.~~2005 ~~Under~~and 2004, the ~~equity~~balance ~~method~~ of ~~accounting~~ the principal reserve fund were $90,995 ~~losses~~and ~~are~~$1,726,473 ~~not~~respectively. The ~~allocable~~bonds were intended to be retired from funds in the ~~Partnership~~reserve iffund at which time the ~~losses~~mortgage ~~reduce its equity~~balance ~~basis~~would ~~below~~be ~~zero~~reduced accordingly. Monthly ~~Losses~~payments into the replacement reserve account were required in ~~excess~~the amount of $6,363. At the ~~Partnership’s~~time ~~investment~~of ~~are allocated~~sale of the Complex, the principal reserve and replacement reserve were returned to the Operating ~~General Partner~~Partnerships.

F-1312

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

45. PARTNERS' ~~INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (CONTINUED)~~EQUITY

The limited partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships provide that cash flow from operations be distributed 99% to the Limited Partner and 1% to the Operating General Partner until the Limited Partner has received a 7% preferred return (the "Preference Amount") on its initial capital contribution. The balance, if any, would be distributed 75% to the Limited Partner and 25% to the Operating General Partner. Any cumulative shortfall not recovered out of subsequent cash flow distributions will be payable from sale or refinancing proceeds, to the extent available. The cumulative preferred amount due to the Limited Partner at December 31, 2005 is $17,443,873. There is no assurance that all or any portion of such amount due as of December 31, 2005 will be paid, and no amount has been accrued.

Net cash proceeds resulting from a sale or refinancing, to the extent available (after the discharge of debts and obligations of the Partnership, including outstanding loans from partners or affiliates), will be distributed generally as follows:

- 99% to the Partnership and 1% to the Operating General Partner, until the Partnership has received an amount equal to its adjusted contributions;

- 99% to the Partnership and 1% to the Operating General Partner, until the Partnership has received an amount equal to the unpaid cumulative Preference Amount;

- the balance of adjusted capital contributions of the General Partner; and

- the balance, if any, 75% to the Partnership and 25% to the Operating General Partner.

The Operating Partnerships’ combined results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 are presented herein Note 4 for informational purposes because the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended February 29, 2004 reflects such operating results under the equity method of accounting.

Revenue
Rent	$	6,876,152
Expenses
Administrative		1,325,315
Operating		2,985,769
Management fees		275,046
Financial		335,062
Depreciation and amortization		1,583,341
		6,504,533
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		371,619
Interest revenue		46,287
NET INCOME	$	417,906
Net income allocated to Wilder Richman Historic Properties II, L.P.	$	413,727
Net income allocated to Dixon Venture Corp.	$	4,179

F-14

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, 2006, FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004

5. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

	2006			2005
Due to (from)
Morris Realty	$	(5,259	)	$	(5,259	)
DVC		1,543,637			1,484,914
Richman Asset Management, Inc.		536,929			499,827
	$	2,075,307		$	1,979,482

The Operating Partnerships incurred property management fees to WRMC, Inc., an affiliate of the Partnership, in the amount of $111,822 and $103,222 in 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, property management fees of $167,732 and $154,112 were incurred in 2005 and 2004, respectively, to Morris Property Management, an affiliate of the Operating General Partner..

Richman Asset Management, Inc. (“RAM”), an affiliate of the Partnership, provides investor services at a fee which is based upon a base amount of $60,000 in 1992 and is subject to adjustment annually thereafter based on changes in the Operating Partnerships’ rental revenue (the “Investor Services Fees”). Total Investor Services Fees incurred for 2006, 2005 and 2004 as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were of $98,314, $95,714 and $24,084, respectively. As of February 28, 2006 and 2005, due to affiliates includes $536,929 and $499,827, respectively, of Investor Services Fees due to RAM.

Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships, DVC is entitled to interest on Operating Deficit Loans and voluntary loans made subsequent to the issuance of the Fannie Mae pass-through certificates (which occurred in February 1991). Interest on such advances accrues at 1% above the JP Morgan Chase prime rate (7.25% and 6% at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively). The Operating Partnerships incurred interest of $58,722 and $45,664 for 2005 and 2004, respectively. The amount payable to DVC is $1,543,637 (including accrued interest of $629,279) as of December 31, 2005 and $1,484,914 (including accrued interest of $570,557) as of December 31, 2004.

6. MORTGAGES PAYABLE

On May 1, 2000, the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency (the “Agency”) provided mortgage financing for the Operating Partnerships in the amount of $28,600,000 for a term of 30 years through the issuance of (a) variable rate tax-exempt bonds in the amount of $26,435,000 maturing on May 15, 2030 (with an interest rate of 3.54% at December 31, 2005 ) which is secured by the property and (b) variable rate taxable bonds in the amount of $2,165,000 (which matured and were paid in full on November 15, 2005 from the principal reserve fund - see below).

To manage risk associated with the variable interest rates associated with the bonds, the Operating Partnerships executed an interest rate cap agreement (the “Rate Cap”) on May 15, 2005 for a cost of $140,000. Pursuant to the terms of the Rate Cap, the maximum interest rate on the bonds is 5%. The Rate Cap expires on May 15, 2010. The Operating Partnerships are required to fund an escrow (in the amount of $2,333 per month, the “Pledged Cap Account”) in connection with the purchase of another interest rate cap upon the expiration of the Rate Cap in 2010. The fair market value of the Rate Cap as of December 31, 2005 is $205,846 which is included in deferred costs on the accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2005.

F-15

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, 2006, FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004

6. MORTGAGES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

Monthly payments are made into a principal reserve fund for the purpose of providing funds for retirement of the tax-exempt bonds issued by the Agency. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the balance of the principal reserve fund is $90,995 and $1,726,473, respectively. The bonds will be retired from funds in the reserve fund at which time the mortgage balance will be reduced accordingly. Monthly payments into the replacement reserve account are required in the amount of $6,363.

At December 31, 2005 the scheduled principal reserve fund payments are as follows:

2006	$	429,334
2007		460,016
2008		492,890
2009		528,113
2010		565,854
Thereafter		23,958,793
	$	26,435,000	*

*Included in liabilities held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2006 (see Note 3).

The carrying amount of the mortgage approximates fair value.

Restricted funds held in deposit as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

	2005		2004
Mortgage escrows
Principal reserve fund	$	90,995	$	1,726,473
Replacement reserve		39,676		183,384
Tax and insurance escrow		462,370		412,165
Pledged cap account		19,036		148,256
Subtotal		612,077*		2,470,278
Additional replacement reserve
not held by lender		1,181,280		815,426
	$	1,793,357	$	3,285,704

*Included in assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2006 (see Note 3).

F-16

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, 2006, FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004

7. PARTNERS' EQUITY

In accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, the General Partner, the special limited partner and the investor limited partners are allocated 1%, .01% and 98.99%, respectively, of income and losses.

Distributions

Cash flow of the Partnership available annually for distribution after payment of Partnership expenses ~~will~~are to be distributed 98.99% to the investor limited partners, .01% to the special limited partner and 1% to the General Partner. For the year ended February 28, 2007 the investor limited partners received distributions of $31,444,000 from the sale of the Complex (see Note 9). For the year ended February 28,2008, distributions were made to investor limited partners totaling $5,602,706, which include required New Jersey income tax withholding payments made on behalf of nonresident limited partners. In addition, the General Partner and the Special Limited Partner received their share of the distribution in the amounts of $317,649 and $3,176, respectively. Subsequent to February 28, 2008, distributions have been made to investor limited partners and the General Partner totaling $16,960 and $3 respectively.

~~Net~~ As of July 31, 2011 the Partnership’s nominee cash ~~proceeds~~ ~~resulting~~account ~~from~~had a ~~sale~~balance orof ~~refinancing~~$539,095. byIt is the ~~Operating~~Partnership’s ~~Partnerships,~~ intention to ~~the~~ ~~extent~~pay ~~available~~its ~~(after~~remaining ~~the~~expenses ~~discharge~~(primarily ofprofessional ~~debts~~fees ~~and~~associated ~~obligations~~with ofthis ~~the Operating~~filing) ~~Partnerships~~ and distribute the ~~Partnership~~balance, ~~including~~if ~~outstanding~~any, ~~loans from partners~~to orits ~~affiliates),~~partners ~~will~~prior beto ~~distributed~~the ~~generally~~end asof ~~follows:~~2011.

~~- 98.99% to~~ Net cash proceeds available resulting from the ~~investor~~sale ~~limited~~of ~~partners,~~the ~~.01%~~Complex toby the ~~special~~Operating ~~limited~~Partnerships, ~~partner~~(after the discharge of debts and 1% toobligations of the ~~General~~ ~~Partner,~~Operating ~~until~~Partnerships and the ~~investor~~Partnership, ~~limited~~including ~~partners~~outstanding ~~have~~loans ~~received~~from anpartners ~~amount equal~~or toaffiliates), ~~their~~have ~~adjusted~~been ~~contributions;~~distributed as follows:

- ~~98.99% to the~~ ~~investor limited partners~~First, ~~.01~~99% to the ~~special~~Partnership as limited partner in the Operating Partnerships and 1% to the Operating General Partner, until the ~~investor~~Partnership ~~limited partners have~~ received an amount equal to its adjusted contributions. The adjusted capital contributions of $19,280,000 and $194,747 were paid to the ~~accrued~~Partnership ~~cumulative~~and the Operating General Partner, ~~non-compounded~~respectively, ~~rate~~in of2006 7%after ~~per~~the ~~annum~~sale ~~(see preferred~~of ~~return~~the ~~below)~~Complex.

- ~~The balance~~ Next, 99% to the Partnership and 1% to the Operating General Partner, until the Partnership received an amount equal to the accrued cumulative, non-compounded return of ~~adjusted~~7% ~~capital~~per ~~contributions~~annum The cumulative return of $18,700,833 and $188,897 was paid to the Partnership and the Operating General Partner, ~~and~~respectively, ~~special limited~~in ~~partner~~2006, ~~and~~The Partnership distribution includes New Jersey income tax withholding payments made on behalf of non resident limited partners of the Partnership.

- ~~The balance~~ Next, ifto ~~any~~the extent available, ~~97.99%~~proceeds equal to the ~~investor~~adjusted ~~limited~~capital ~~partners,~~contributions of the Operating General Partner of $17,057,857.~~01%~~ toAdjusted ~~the~~proceeds ~~special limited~~of ~~partner~~$4,854,009 ~~and~~were 2%paid to the Operating General Partner in 2006. The Operating General Partner may receive an additional distribution to the extent amounts are available from the Agency required escrow (see Note 9).

F-1713

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

86. TAXABLE LOSS

A reconciliation of the financial statement net income of the Partnership for the years ended February 28, ~~2006~~2007, 2006 ~~February~~and ~~28,~~ 2005 ~~and February 29, 2004~~ to the net loss as shown on the tax returns for the years ended December 31, ~~2005~~2006, ~~2004~~ 2005 and ~~2003~~2004 is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003
	2006				2005				2004
Financial statement income for the years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005 and February 28, 2004	$	375,916		$	138,125		$	110,448
Financial statement income for the years ended February 28, 2007, February 28, 2006 and February 28, 2005	$	37,164,087			$	375,916			$	138,125
Interest income and other transactions due to timing differences resulting from different fiscal year ends for tax purposes v. financial reporting purposes		20(8,~~827~~961	)		~~24,275~~	20,827		~~1,980~~		24,275
		396,743			162,400			112,428
		37,155,126				396,743				162,400
Financial statement to tax return difference arising from investments in Operating Partnerships		(212,586	)		(139,473	)
Gain on sale of real estate assets for tax purposes in excess of gain for Financial statements		28,057,325				(65,846	)			--
Minority interest allocation		5,358			4,188
Financial statement to tax return difference arising from investments in Operating Partnerships		(319,908	)			(212,586	)			(139,473	)
Adjustment to fair market value of Rate Cap recorded for financial statement purposes		(65,846	)		--			--
Minority interest allocation		(7,681,456	)			5,358				4,188
Write off of unamortized Rate Cap		113,891
Adjustment to fair market value of Rate Cap recorded for financial statement purposes		--				(65,846	)			--
Amounts paid/payable to related parties not deductible under Internal Revenue Code Section 267 and other adjustments		97,036			81,378			196,187
Write off of unamortized Rate Cap		--				113,891
Excess of depreciation expense of the Operating Partnerships for income tax purpose over financial reporting purposes		(1,721,324	)		(1,596,884	)		(1,128,022	)
Amounts paid/payable to related parties not deductible under Internal Revenue Code Section 267 and other adjustments		(606,556	)			97,036				81,378
Tax return net loss for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively	$	(1,386,728	)	$	(1,488,391	)	$	(819,407	)
Excess of depreciation expense of the Operating Partnerships for income tax purpose over financial reporting purposes		(2,403,759	)			(1,721,324	)			(1,596,884	)
Tax return net loss for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively	$	54,200,772			$	(1,386,728	)		$	(1,488,391	)

F-1814

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

86. TAXABLE LOSS (CONTINUED)

The differences in the assets of the Partnership for financial reporting purposes and tax reporting purposes as of February 28, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 are as follows:

	2006		2005
	2007			2006
Assets - financial reporting	$	44,794,461	$	47,172,799
Assets – financial reporting	$	8,072,299		$	44,794,461
Assets - tax reporting		27,207,731		31,718,225
Assets – tax reporting		3,364,706			27,207,731
Difference	$	174,~~586~~707,~~730~~593	$	~~15,454,574~~$	17,586,730

98. FAIR ~~CONTINGENCY~~VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” The estimated fair value of amounts has been determined using available market information, assumptions, estimates and valuation methodologies.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Escrow Agreement Deposit, Mortgage Escrows and Other Deposits and Tenant Security Deposits

The carrying amount approximates fair value.

The estimated fair values of the Partnership’s financial instruments as of February 28, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~2005~~2006 are disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements.

~~F-19~~9. SALE OF COMPLEX AND TERMINATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP

The Operating Partnerships received a written offer effective May 24, 2006 from a non-affiliate third party to purchase the Complex for $69,960,000. In order to obtain the approval of the Jersey City Redevelopment Authority (the issuer of the bonds underlying the mortgage of the Complex – see Note 4), the Agency required the Operating Partnerships to deposit $2,000,000 with an escrow agent in connection with any potential claims arising in connection with the status of the variable rate tax exempt bonds. The Operating General Partner agreed to such terms. Subsequent to the approval by the Agency, the sale price was modified to $69,460,000 and the sale of the Complex (the “Sale”) was consummated on November 14, 2006.

At the Sale, the Operating Partnerships repaid in full all outstanding mortgages totaling $26,435,000 and deposited an Agency-required escrow of $2,000,000, which was set aside for estimated NJ non-resident withholding tax. In addition, the Operating Partnerships incurred closing costs of $2,792,442 and made a distribution to the Partnership in the amount of $32,378,126, with an additional amount owing of $5,602,706. The $2,000,000 escrow was set aside from Sale proceeds otherwise payable to the Operating General Partner pursuant to the terms of the limited partnership agreements of the Operating Partnerships. Accordingly, if such amount or any portion thereof is released pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement between the Operating Partnerships and the Agency, any such amount will be distributed to the Operating General Partner.

F-15

WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED

FEBRUARY 28, ~~2006~~2007, FEBRUARY 28, ~~2005~~2006 AND FEBRUARY 2928, ~~2004~~2005

~~11.~~During ~~QUARTERLY~~the ~~FINANCIAL~~year ~~INFORMATION~~ended February 28, 2008, the Partnership received the remaining proceeds from Sale of $2,869,088 (~~UNAUDITED~~net of State of New Jersey withholding taxes on non–resident partners in the amount of $2,715,098 and State of New Jersey filing fees of $18,520) and made additional distributions of $2,888,032 to the limited partners and $320,825 in aggregate to the General Partner and Special Limited Partner. Subsequent to February 28, 2008, distributions have been made to investor limited partners and the General Partner totaling $141,565 and $171 respectively, with approximately $585,000 held back for potential unforeseen costs, pursuant to the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement.

The Partnership filed a final Federal tax return effective December 31, 2007. All remaining cash was deposited into a nominee account held by the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership. As of July 31, 2011 the Partnership’s nominee cash account had a balance of $539,095. It is the Partnership’s intention to pay its remaining expenses (primarily professional fees associated with this filing) and distribute the balance, if any, to its partners by December 31, 2011.

10. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of results of operations for each of the four quarters for the fiscal years indicated.

	First			~~Second~~	Second		~~Third~~		Third	~~Fourth~~			Fourth
	Quarter			~~Quarter~~	Quarter		~~Quarter~~		Quarter	~~Quarter~~			Quarter
2006
2007
Total revenue	$	1,~~789~~811,~~847~~764		$	~~1,792,871~~$	1,843,422	$	~~1,748,262~~	$	$2,734,385	~~1,863,213~~		$	155,076
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(273,~~496~~787	)		~~18,881~~	(10,483	)	~~8,588~~		239,798	~~32,764~~			64,331
Net income (loss)		118,513			97,831			(26,132	)		185,704
Net income		438,554				420,233				36,242,136				63,164
Net income (loss) per unit of limited partnership interest		146.66			121.07			(32.34	)		229.81
Net income per unit of limited partnership interest		542.71				520.04				44,849.64				78.19
2005
2006
Total revenue		1,~~685~~789,~~220~~847			~~1,696,637~~	1,792,871		~~1,714,797~~		1,748,262	~~1,771,702~~			1,863,213
Loss from continuing operations		(4127,~~683~~496	)		~~(40,399~~	)18,881		~~(53,616~~	)	8,588	~~(85,965~~	)		32,764
Net income (loss)		(5118,~~074~~513	)		~~68,099~~	97,831		~~179,235~~		(26,132	~~(104,135~~)	)		185,704
Net income (loss) per unit of limited partnership interest		(6146.2866	)		~~84.27~~	121.07		~~221.81~~		(32.34	~~(128.87~~)	)		229.81

The amounts reported above for revenues in each of the first two quarters for fiscal 2005 do not agree to the amounts reported in the Partnership’s reports on Form 10F-Q. The amounts above reflect the consolidated revenues of the Partnership and the Operating Partnerships. The amounts previously reported in the Partnership’s reports on Form 10-Q reflected revenues of the Partnership only and accounted for the operations of the Operating Partnerships using the equity method. The financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2005 reflect consolidation for the entire year. The Partnership, with the consent of the SEC, has elected not to amend the 2005 first and second quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the effects of consolidation. 16

F-20

Filing Compare · WILDER RICHMAN HISTORIC PROPERTIES II LP