UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014

or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___ to ___

Commission File Number 0-17466

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VIA
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware		16-1309987
(State of Formation)		(I.R.S. Employer
		Identification No.)

2350 North Forest Road, Getzville, New York 14068
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (716) 636-9090

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Units of Limited Partnership Interest

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
[ ] Yes	[X] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
[ ] Yes	[X] No

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___ to ___

Commission File Number 0-17466

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VIA

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware		16-1309987
(State of Formation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2350 North Forest Road, Getzville, New York 14068

(Address of Principal Executive Office)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code: (716) 636-9090

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Units of Limited Partnership Interest

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[ ] Yes [X] No

Note: Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 45 of Regulation S-T (par. 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [X ] Yes [ X] No

Indicate by a check mark ~~whether~~if ~~the~~disclosure ~~registrant~~of ~~has~~delinquent ~~submitted~~filers ~~electronically~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~posted~~Item on405 ~~its~~of ~~corporate~~Regulation ~~Web~~S-K ~~site,~~is ifnot ~~any~~contained herein, ~~every~~and ~~Interactive~~will ~~Data~~not ~~File required to~~ be ~~submitted~~contained, ~~and posted pursuant~~ to ~~Rule~~the 45best of ~~Regulation~~the ~~S-T~~registrant's ~~(par.~~knowledge, ~~232.405~~in ofdefinitive ~~this~~proxy ~~chapter)~~or ~~during~~information ~~the~~statements ~~preceding~~incorporated 12by ~~months~~reference ~~(or~~in ~~for~~part ~~such~~III ~~shorter~~of ~~period~~this ~~that~~Form ~~the~~10-K ~~registrant~~or ~~was~~any ~~required~~amendment to ~~submit~~this ~~and~~Form ~~post such files)~~10-K. [X]

~~[ ]~~Indicate ~~Yes [X]~~by Nocheck mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Large accelerated filer	[ ]	Accelerated filer	[ ]
Non-accelerated filer	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) [ ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

[ ] Yes [X] No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12,13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a ~~count~~court. [ ] Yes [ ] No

[ ] Yes [X] No

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’'s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed document should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

2REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

PART I

ITEM 1: BUSINESS

The Registrant, Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership-VI A (the “"Partnership”"), is a Delaware Limited Partnership organized in September 1987 pursuant to an Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “"Partnership Agreement”"), under the Revised Delaware Uniform Limited Partnership Act. ~~The~~ At December 31, 2013, Partnership’'s general ~~partners~~partner ~~are~~is Realmark Properties, Inc. (the “"Corporate General Partner”"), a Delaware corporation~~, and Joseph M~~. ~~Jayson (the “Individual General Partner”).~~

Joseph M. Jayson served as individual general partner of the Partnership (the "Individual General Partner") along with the Corporate General Partner until he passed away on June 27, 2014. A successor Individual General Partner was not appointed following Mr. Jayson's death.

The Registrant commenced the public offering of its limited partnership units, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on November 10, 1987, and concluded the offering on November 10, 1988, having raised a total of $15,737,790 before deducting sales commissions and expenses of the offering.

The Partnership’'s primary business and its only industry segment iswas to own and operate income-producing real property for the benefit of its partners. At December 31, ~~2012~~2014, the Partnership has a 50% joint partner interest in Research Triangle Industrial Park Joint Venture.

The Partnership has a 50% interest in the unconsolidated joint venture in Realmark Research, LLC (known as Research Triangle Industrial Park Joint Venture). Realmark Research, LLC (Research) advanced a portion of its sales proceeds in the amount of $1,066,719 to an affiliate under a Memorandum of Understanding Agreement dated December 8, 2006. Under the terms of this agreement, the affiliate agrees to repay this loan plus interest at a rate of 8% per annum, upon the sale of a remaining property, which is currently being marketed for sale.

The business of the Partnership is not seasonal and it competes on the basis of rental rates and property operations with similar types of properties in vicinities in which the Partnership’s properties are located. The Partnership has no real property investments located outside the United States. The Partnership does not segregate revenue or assets by geographic region, since, in management’s view, such a presentation would not be significant to an understanding of the Partnership’s business or financial results taken as a whole. As of December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and 2013, the Partnership did not directly employ any persons in a full-time position. All persons who regularly rendered services on behalf of the Partnership ~~through December 31, 2012~~ were employees of the Corporate General Partner or its affiliates.

This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements concerning the Partnership’'s current expectations as to future results. Words such as “"believes”", “"forecasts”", “"intends”", “"possible”", “"expects”", “"estimates”", “"anticipates”" or “"plans”" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements may not ultimately turn out to be accurate due to, among other things, economic or market conditions or the failure of the Partnership to sell an investment which is under contract.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

Investors or potential investors in Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - VIA should carefully consider the risks described below. These risks are not the only ones we face. Additional risks of which we are presently unaware or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations and hinder our financial performance, including our ability to make distributions to our investors.

We have organized our summary of these risks into five subsections:

● real estate related risks; ● financing risks; ● tax risks; ● environmental and other legal risks; and ● risks for investors.

● tax risks; ● environmental and other legal risks; and

● risks for investors.

This section includes forward-looking statements.

Real Estate Related Risks

We face substantial competition

The property of our joint venture is located in a developed area where we face substantial competition from other properties and from other real estate companies that own or may develop or renovate competing properties. The number of competitive properties and real estate companies could have a material adverse effect on our ability to rent our property and the rents we charge. In addition, the activities of these competitors and these factors could:

●	decrease the rental rates that we would be able to charge in the absence of such direct competition; and
●	reduce the occupancy rates that we would otherwise be able to achieve.

The factors could materially and adversely affect the value of our portfolio, our results of operations and our ability to pay amounts due on our debt and distributions to our investors.

Changes in market or economic conditions may affect our business negatively

General economic conditions and other factors beyond our control may adversely affect real property income and capital appreciation. We are unable to determine the precise effect that the performance of the worldwide or United States economies will have on us or on the value of our property.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS (continued)

Terrorism could impair our business

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Attacks that directly affect our commercial property could significantly affect our ability to operate that property and impair our ability to achieve the results we expect. Our insurance coverage may not cover any losses caused by a terrorist attack. In addition, the adverse effects that such violent acts and threats of future attacks could have on the United States economy could similarly have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

~~Our~~Commercial ~~commercial~~ and office tenants may go bankrupt or be unable to make lease payments in a commercial property of an affiliate and adversely affect the potential sale price of that property upon which repayment of a loan made to that affiliate is dependent.

Our operating revenues from ~~our~~the commercial property ~~depend~~owned by an affiliate (to which our joint venture loaned money) depends on entering into leases with and collecting rents from tenants. Economic conditions may adversely affect tenants and potential tenants in our market and, accordingly, could affect their ability to pay rents and possibly to occupy their space. Tenants may experience bankruptcies and various bankruptcy laws may reject those leases or terminate them. If leases expire or end, replacement tenants may not be available upon acceptable terms and conditions. In addition, if the market rental rates are lower than the previous contractual rates, ~~our~~the ~~cash~~market ~~flows~~value and ~~net~~potential ~~income~~sale price of that property could suffer a negative impact. As aIf ~~result, if~~ a significant number of ~~our~~these commercial or office tenants fail to pay their rent due to bankruptcy, weakened financial condition or otherwise, it would negatively affect the market value and potential sale price of that property as well as the re-payment of a loan made by our joint venture to that affiliate, the collection of our receivable and our financial performance.

Real estate properties are illiquid and may be difficult to sell, particularly in a poor market environment

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, which tends to limit our ability to react promptly to changes in economic or other market conditions. Our ability to ~~dispose~~collect ofupon disposed assets in the future will depend on prevailing economic and market conditions.

Losses from natural catastrophes may exceed our insurance coverage

The joint venture carries comprehensive liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on the property, which we believe is customary in amount and type for real property assets. Some losses, however, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as losses from floods, may be subject to limitations. We may not be able to maintain our insurance at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against potential losses. Further, our insurance costs could increase in future periods. If we suffer a substantial loss, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement value of the lost investment. ~~Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors also might make it impractical to use insurance proceeds to replace a damaged or destroyed property.~~

~~Financing Risks~~4

WeREALMARK ~~may~~PROPERTY beINVESTORS ~~unable~~LIMITED toPARTNERSHIP ~~refinance~~- ~~our~~VI ~~existing debt or we may only be able to do so on unfavorable terms~~A

WeITEM ~~are~~1A: ~~subject~~RISK toFACTORS ~~the normal risks associated with debt financing, including:~~(continued)

●Inflation, ~~the~~changes ~~risk~~in ~~that~~building ~~our~~codes ~~cash~~and ~~flow~~ordinances, ~~will~~environmental beconsiderations ~~insufficient~~and other factors also might make it impractical to ~~meet~~use ~~required~~insurance ~~payments~~proceeds ofto ~~principal~~replace ~~and~~a ~~interest;~~damaged ~~and~~or destroyed property.

● the risk that we will not be able to renew, repay or refinance our debt when it matures or that the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the existing terms of that debt.

Tax Risks

Our operating partnership may fail to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes

Management believes that our operating partnership qualifies, and has qualified since its formation as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and not as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. We can provide no assurance, however, that the IRS will not challenge the treatment of the operating partnership as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in treating the operating partnership as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, then the taxable income of the operating partnership would be taxable at regular corporate income tax rates.

You may be allocated more taxable income than the distributions, if any, you receive from us

So long as the Partnership remains eligible to be taxed as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we generally are not subject to U.S. federal income tax. Rather, each holder of our units of limited partnership interest is required to take into account its allocable share of items of our income, gain, loss, deduction and credit for our taxable year ending within or with the taxable year of such holder in computing such holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, and, in some cases, state and local income tax liability, and to pay taxes thereon, regardless of whether the holder has received any distributions from us. Given that we do not currently intend to distribute cash to holders of our units of limited partnership interest (other than cash available for distribution obtained from outstanding receivables following payments due under the settlement of prior legal proceedings and other liabilities in the course of winding up the Partnership), it is possible that the U.S. federal income tax liability, and in some cases, state and local income tax liability, of a holder of our units of limited partnership interest with respect to its allocable share of our earnings in a particular taxable year will exceed the cash distributions, if any, we make to the holder for the year, thus requiring an out-of-pocket tax payment by the holder. For a description of prior legal proceedings, see Item 3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Environmental and Other Legal Risks

We may have liability under environmental laws

Under federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, we may be required to investigate and clean up the effects of releases of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products at our properties, regardless of our knowledge or responsibility, simply because of our current or past ownership or operation of the real estate. Therefore, we may have liability with respect to properties we have already sold. If environmental problems arise, we may have to take extensive measures to remedy the problems, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay distributions to our investors because:

●REALMARK wePROPERTY ~~may~~INVESTORS ~~have~~LIMITED toPARTNERSHIP ~~pay for property damage and for investigation and clean~~-up ~~costs~~VI ~~incurred in connection with the contamination;~~A

●ITEM ~~the~~1A: ~~law~~RISK ~~typically~~FACTORS ~~imposes clean-up responsibility and liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination;~~(continued)

●because ~~even~~of ifour ~~more~~current ~~than~~or ~~one~~past ~~person~~ownership ~~may~~or beoperation ~~responsible~~of ~~for~~ the ~~contamination,~~real ~~each~~estate. ~~person~~Therefore, ~~who~~we ~~shares~~may ~~legal~~have liability ~~under~~with ~~the~~respect to properties we have already sold. If environmental ~~laws~~problems arise, we may behave ~~held~~to ~~responsible~~take ~~for~~extensive ~~all~~measures ofto remedy the ~~clean-up~~problems, ~~costs;~~which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay distributions to our investors because:

● we may have to pay for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination; ● the law typically imposes clean-up responsibility and liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination; ● even if more than one person may be responsible for the contamination, each person who shares legal liability under the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs; and ● governmental entities or other third parties may sue the owner or operator of a contaminated site for damages and costs.

These costs could be substantial and in extreme cases could exceed the value of the contaminated property. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products and the failure to remediate that contamination properly may materially and adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent an affected property. In addition, applicable environmental laws create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with a contamination.

We may face risks related to mold and asbestos

Recently, there has been an increasing number of lawsuits against owners and managers of properties alleging personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in real estate.

Some of these lawsuits have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. Although our insurance policy currently does not exclude mold-related claims, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to obtain coverage in the future for those claims at a commercially reasonable price or at all. The presence of significant mold could expose us to liability to tenants and others if allegations regarding property damage, health concerns or similar claims arise.

Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance and removal of asbestos. Those laws require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos:

● properly manage and maintain the asbestos; ● notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestos; and ● undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building.

~~● notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestos; and~~6

●REALMARK ~~undertake~~PROPERTY ~~special~~INVESTORS ~~precautions,~~LIMITED ~~including~~PARTNERSHIP ~~removal~~- orVI ~~other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building.~~A

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS (continued)

Those laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow others to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers.

Failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other similar laws could result in substantial costs

A number of federal, state and local laws and regulations (including the Americans with Disabilities Act) may require modifications to existing buildings or restrict certain renovations by requiring improved access to such buildings by disabled persons and may require other structural features that add to the cost of buildings under construction. Legislation or regulations adopted in the future may impose further burdens or restrictions on us with respect to improved access by disabled persons. The costs of compliance with these laws and regulations may be substantial, and restrictions on construction or completion of renovations may limit implementation of our investment strategy in certain instances or reduce overall returns on our investments, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to pay distributions to investors and to pay amounts due on our debt.

Risks for Investors

We may never make any distributions to holders of our units of limited partnership interest.

We do not anticipate making any distributions to holders of our units of limited partnership interest at any time in the near future other than cash available for distribution obtained from outstanding receivables following payments due under the settlement of prior legal proceedings and other liabilities in the course of winding up the Partnership. Whether we make distributions in the future will be at the discretion of our corporate general partner and will be reduced by the amount of fees payable to plaintiffs' legal counsel in connection with the settlement of prior legal proceedings and dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and any other factors that our corporate general partner decides are relevant. As such, investors seeking cash distributions should not purchase our units of limited partnership interest. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our units of limited partnership interest unless you are able to sell our units of limited partnership interest for a price greater than that which you paid for it. For a description of prior legal proceedings, see Item 3 to this Annual Report Form 10-K.

ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2: PROPERTIES

The Research Triangle Industrial Park Joint Venture owned a 117,000 square foot office/warehouse distribution building in Raleigh, North Carolina. In December 2006, the building was sold for a purchase price of $5,700,000. The first mortgage loan on the property was paid off in the amount of $4,117,763.

ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously reported, the Partnership, as a nominal defendant, the General Partners of the Partnership and of affiliated public partnerships, (the “Realmark Partnerships”) and the officers and directors of the Corporate General Partner, as defendants, had been involved in a class action litigation at the state court level regarding the payment of fees and other management issues.

On August 29, 2001, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Settlement”). On October 4, 2001, the Court issued an “Order Preliminary Approving Settlement” (the “Hearing Order”) and on November 29, 2001, the court issued an “Order and Final Judgment Approving Settlement and Awarding Fees and Expenses” and dismissing the complaints with prejudice. The Settlement provided, among other things, that:

● The payable to the general partners and/or their affiliates by the Realmark Property Investors LimitedPartnership VI-A at March 31, 2001, in the amount of $481,598, cease to accrue interest.

● All of the Realmark Partnerships’ properties be disposed of. The general partners will continue to have primary authority to dispose of the Partnerships’ properties. If either (i) the general partners have not sold or contracted to sell 50% of the Partnerships’ properties (by value) by April 2, 2002 or (ii) the general partners have not sold or contracted to sell 100% of the Partnerships’ properties by September 29, 2002, then the primary authority to dispose of the Partnerships’ properties will pass to a sales agent designated by plaintiffs’ counsel and approved by the Court. On October 4, 2002, the Court appointed a sales agent to work with the general partners to continue to sell the Partnership’s remaining properties.

The settlement also provided for the payment by the Partnerships of fees to the plaintiffs’ attorneys. These payments, which are not calculable at this time but may be significant, are payable out of the proceeds from the sale of all of the properties owned by all of the Realmark Partnerships, following the sale of the last of these properties in each partnership. Plaintiffs’ counsel will receive 15% of the amount by which the sales proceeds distributable to limited partners in each partnership exceeds the value of the limited partnership units in each partnership (based on the weighted average of the units’ trading prices on the secondary market as reported by Partnership Spectrum for the period May through June 2001). In no event may the increase on which the fees are calculated exceed 100% of the market value of the units as calculated above.

ITEM 4: SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously reported, the Partnership, as a nominal defendant, the General Partners of the Partnership and of affiliated public partnerships, (the "Realmark Partnerships") and the officers and directors of the Corporate General Partner, as defendants, had been involved in a class action litigation at the state court level regarding the payment of fees and other management issues.

On August 29, 2001, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Settlement"). On October 4, 2001, the Court issued an "Order Preliminary Approving Settlement" (the "Hearing Order") and on November 29, 2001, the court issued an "Order and Final Judgment Approving Settlement and Awarding Fees and Expenses" and dismissing the complaints with prejudice. The Settlement provided, among other things, that:

●

The payable to the general partners and/or their affiliates by the Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership VI-A at March 31, 2001, in the amount of $481,598, cease to accrue interest.

●

All of the Realmark Partnerships' properties be disposed of. The general partners will continue to have primary authority to dispose of the Partnerships' properties. If either (i) the general partners have not sold or contracted to sell 50% of the Partnerships' properties (by value) by April 2, 2002 or (ii) the general partners have not sold or contracted to sell 100% of the Partnerships' properties by September 29, 2002, then the primary authority to dispose of the Partnerships' properties will pass to a sales agent designated by plaintiffs' counsel and approved by the Court. On October 4, 2002, the Court appointed a sales agent to work with the general partners to continue to sell the Partnership's remaining properties.

The settlement also provided for the payment by the Partnerships of fees to the plaintiffs' attorneys. These payments, which have been estimated and accrued for on our financial statements, are payable out of the proceeds from the sale of all of the properties owned by all of the Realmark Partnerships, following the sale of the last of these properties in each partnership. Plaintiffs' counsel will receive 15% of the amount by which the sales proceeds distributable to limited partners in each partnership exceeds the value of the limited partnership units in each partnership (based on the weighted average of the units' trading prices on the secondary market as reported by Partnership Spectrum for the period May through June 2001). In no event may the increase on which the fees are calculated exceed 100% of the market value of the units as calculated above.

PART II

ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’'S UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

There is currently no active trading market for the units of limited partnership interest of the Partnership and it is not anticipated that any will develop in the future. Accordingly, information as to the market value of a unit at any given date is not available. As of December 31, ~~2012~~2014, there were 1,~~585~~544 record holders of units of limited partnership interest.

The Partnership is a limited partnership and, accordingly, does not pay dividends. It does, however, make distributions of cash to its partners. The partnership agreement provides for the distribution to the partners of net cash flow from operations. All future distributions of net cash from sales proceeds will be distributed, to the extent available, 100% to the limited partners until there has been a return of the limited partner’s capital contribution plus an amount sufficient to provide a 7%, not compounded, return on their adjusted capital contributions for all years following the termination of the offering of the units. It is anticipated that there will not be sufficient cash flow from the sale of the Partnership’s remaining properties to provide this return to the limited partners. There was a $300,000 distribution, made to partners in 2011. There were no distributions made to the partners in 2012.

The gain on the sale of the properties will be allocated in the same proportions as distributions of distributable cash from sale proceeds (anticipated to be 100% to the limited partners). In the event there is no distributable cash from sale proceeds, taxable income will be allocated 87% to the limited partners and 13% to the general partners. Any tax loss arising from a sale will be allocated 97% to the limited partners and 3% to the general partners. The above is subject to tax laws that were applicable at the time of the formation of the Partnership and may be adjusted due to subsequent changes in the Internal Revenue Code.

~~ITEM~~REALMARK ~~6:SELECTED~~PROPERTY ~~FINANICAL~~INVESTORS ~~DATA~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

AsITEM ~~the~~5: ~~registrant~~MARKET ~~qualifies~~FOR asREGISTRANT'S aUNITS ~~small~~OF ~~reporting~~LIMITED ~~company~~PARTNERSHIP asINTEREST ~~defined by ss.229-10~~(fcont'd)~~(1) of regulations S-K, the registrant is not required to provide the information required by this item.~~

The Partnership is a limited partnership and, accordingly, does not pay dividends but rather may return cash in the form of distributions to its partners. It does, however, make distributions of cash to its partners. The partnership agreement provides for the distribution to the partners of net cash flow from operations. All future distributions of net cash from sales proceeds will be distributed, to the extent available, 100% to the limited partners until there has been a return of the limited partner's capital contribution plus an amount sufficient to provide a 7%, not compounded, return on their adjusted capital contributions for all years following the termination of the offering of the units. It is anticipated that there will be sufficient cash flow following re-payment of a loan made by our joint venture upon sale of a property by an affiliate and our collection of a corresponding receivable to provide some or all of this return to the limited partners in calendar year 2016. There were no distributions made to the partners in 2014 or 2013.

~~ITEM~~REALMARK 7:PROPERTY ~~MANAGEMENT’S~~INVESTORS ~~DISCUSSION~~LIMITED ~~AND~~PARTNERSHIP ~~ANALYSIS~~- OFVI ~~FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~A

ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Effective January 1, 2001, the Partnership began formally marketing all of its properties for sale. All properties were sold in 2003. ~~There~~ ~~was a $300,000 distribution made to partners in 2011.~~ There were no distributions to partners made in ~~2012~~2014 or 2013. In accordance with the settlement of the lawsuit (Item 3) it is anticipated that with the sale of the remaining joint venture, the Partnership may be in a position to make distributions to the limited partners. ~~These~~ If there are any distributions they will be reduced by the amount of fees payable to the plaintiffs’' legal counsel in connection with the settlement agreement (Item 3), and any outstanding liabilities ~~and~~(including ~~any~~those ~~mortgage~~liabilities) ~~prepayment penalties~~ incurred with regard to the sale of the Partnership’'s joint venture.

Limited partners should be aware that it is possible that they will receive an allocation of income from gain on sale of properties on which they will be required to pay income taxes and there is no assurance that cash distributions from the sale of the properties will be sufficient to satisfy these obligations.

Except as described above and in the consolidated financial statements, the general partner is not aware of any trends or events, commitments or uncertainties that may impact liquidity in a material way.

Results of Operations

As a result of the sale of its remaining wholly-owned properties, the Partnership’'s rental operations ceased in 2003. Operations for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 primarily consisted of ownership of the joint venture investment, administrative costs, and professional fees.

~~2012~~2014 as compared to ~~2011~~2013

As discussed above, the decrease in most components of the consolidated statements of operations was a result of the remaining wholly-owned properties being sold in 2003 and rental operations ceasing at the time of the sales. Administrative expenses primarily represent payments for legal fees and other professional fees amounting to $3784,~~524~~023 and $5631,~~070~~930 in ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013, respectively, and administrative fees paid to an affiliate amounting to $1310,~~500~~882 and $1116,~~847~~626 in ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013, respectively. The fees in 2014 are greater than 2013 primarily due to changes in personnel, additional filings and professional services to prepare them as well as the addition of an accrual for expenses related to a previous litigation settlement (see Item 3).

Joint Venture

The Partnership owns 50% of a Joint Venture, which owned the Research Triangle Industrial Park West, an office/warehouse facility located in Durham County, North Carolina, which was sold in December 2006. In ~~2012,~~The ~~the~~investment ~~Joint~~is ~~Venture~~accounted ~~recorded~~for ~~interest~~under ~~income~~the ofequity ~~approximately~~method ~~$42,000~~and ~~due~~the toresulting anincome ~~advance~~decreased ~~of funds to an affiliated party in December 2006. Total expenses increased from~~ approximately $122,~~900~~000 in ~~2011~~2014 tofrom ~~$3,700 in 2012~~2013.

~~ITEM~~REALMARK ~~7A: QUANTITATIVE~~PROPERTY ~~AND~~INVESTORS ~~QUALITATIVE~~LIMITED ~~DISCLOSURES~~PARTNERSHIP ~~ABOUT~~- ~~MARKET~~VI ~~RISK~~A

The Partnership invests only in short term money market instruments, in amounts in excess of daily working cash requirements. The rates of earnings on those investments increase or decrease in line with the general movement of interest rates. The mortgage loans on the Partnership’s properties are fixed rate and therefore, are not subject to market risk.

ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Listed under Item 15 of this report.

ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Partnership’'s management, including the Partnership’'s ~~Individual~~Principal ~~General~~Executive ~~Partner~~Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Partnership’'s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, the Partnership’'s ~~Individual~~Principal ~~General~~Executive ~~Partner~~Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership’'s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such period end. Management will endeavor to enhance the Partnership’'s disclosure controls and procedures to cause them to become effective.

Management’'s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management ~~of the Partnership~~ is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting infor ~~accordance~~the ~~with~~company. ~~Exchange~~Internal ~~Act~~control ~~Rules~~over ~~13a-15(f)~~financial ~~and~~reporting ~~15d-15(f). Management~~is ~~conducted~~a anprocess ~~evaluation~~to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~Partnership’s~~United ~~internal~~States of America. Internal control over financial reporting ~~based~~includes onmaintaining ~~the~~records ~~framework~~that in reasonable detail accurately and ~~criteria~~fairly ~~established~~reflect inour ~~Internal~~transactions; ~~Control~~providing -reasonable ~~Integrated~~assurance ~~Framework,~~that ~~issued~~transactions byare ~~the~~recorded ~~Committee~~as necessary for preparation of ~~Sponsoring~~our ~~Organizations~~financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of ~~the~~company ~~Treadway~~assets ~~Commission.~~are ~~Based~~made onin accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that ~~evaluation~~unauthorized acquisition, ~~management~~use ~~concluded~~or disposition of company assets that ~~the~~could ~~Partnership’s~~have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting ~~was~~is not ~~effective~~intended asto provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of ~~December~~our ~~31,~~financial ~~2012~~statements would be prevented or detected.

~~Because~~Management conducted an evaluation of the Partnership’'s ~~small~~internal ~~size~~control ~~and~~over ~~limited~~ financial ~~resources,~~reporting ~~there~~based ison ~~a limited number of persons, including~~ the ~~Individual~~framework ~~General Partner~~ and ~~Principal~~criteria ~~Financial~~established ~~Officer,~~in ~~dealing~~Internal ~~with~~Control ~~all~~- ~~general~~Integrated ~~administrative~~Framework ~~and financial matters. While management utilizes outside resources when necessary~~(1992), ~~this~~issued ~~lack~~by ~~of segregation of duties constitutes a material weakness in financial reporting. At this time, management has decided that given~~ the ~~risks~~Committee ~~associated with this lack~~ of ~~segregation~~Sponsoring ofOrganizations ~~duties, the potential benefit~~ of ~~adding additional personnel to clearly segregate duties does not justify~~ the ~~expenses~~Treadway ~~associated with such benefit. Management will periodically review this matter and may make modifications, including adding additional personnel, it determines appropriate.~~

~~Our~~REALMARK ~~management,~~PROPERTY ~~including~~INVESTORS ~~the~~LIMITED ~~Individual~~PARTNERSHIP General Partner and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all controls systems, no evaluation of controls, can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-~~making~~ ~~can~~VI be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.A

~~This~~ITEM ~~annual~~9A: ~~report~~CONTROLS ~~does~~AND ~~not~~PROCEDURES include an attestation report of the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Partnership to provide only management’s report in this annual report.(cont'd)

~~Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting~~Commission. ~~Subsequent~~Based toon ~~the~~that ~~date of their most recent~~ evaluation, ~~there~~management ~~have~~concluded ~~been~~that ~~no changes in~~ the Partnership’'s internal control over financial reporting ~~that~~was ~~has~~not ~~materially~~effective ~~affected,~~as orof isDecember ~~reasonably likely to materially affect~~31, ~~the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting~~2014.

Because of the Partnership's small size and limited financial resources, there is a limited number of persons, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, dealing with all general administrative and financial matters. While management utilizes outside resources when necessary, this lack of segregation of duties, as well as lack of expertise with certain complex GAAP and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") reporting matters, constitute material weaknesses in financial reporting. These material weaknesses have also resulted in the correction of errors and amended 10-K discussed elsewhere in the document. At this time, management has decided that given the risks associated with this lack of segregation of duties and expertise, the potential benefit of adding additional personnel to clearly segregate duties does not justify the expenses associated with such benefit. Management will periodically review this matter and may make modifications, including adding additional personnel, it determines appropriate. In response to these material weaknesses management made staffing changes, such as replacing the Controller, and hiring consultants to assist in preparation of the financials. However, these changes have still not completely remediated the material weaknesses identified and reported.

Our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all controls systems, no evaluation of controls, can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the partnership have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership's registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that do not apply to the Partnership as a smaller reporting company.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation, there have been no changes in the Partnership's internal control over

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (cont'd)

financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The Partnership, as an entity, does not have any directors or officers. ~~The~~ ~~Individual General Partner of the Partnership is Joseph M. Jayson.~~ The directors and executive officers of Realmark Properties, Inc., the Partnership’'s Corporate General Partner, as of December 31, ~~2012~~2014, are listed below. Each director is subject to election on an annual basis.

Name		Title of All Positions Held with the Corporate General Partner	Year First Elected to Position
	Title of All Positions Held with	Year First Elected
Joseph M. Jayson		Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer	1979
Name	the Corporate General Partner	to Position
Judith P. Jayson		Vice President and Director	1979
Matthew P. Iak	President and Director	2014
Jordan M. Jayson	Director	2014
Alan J. Laurita	Director	2014

~~Joseph~~Matthew ~~M. Jayson and Judith~~ P. ~~Jayson are married to each other.~~Iak

~~The~~Mr. ~~Directors~~Iak, ~~and~~age ~~Executive~~38, ~~Officers~~was appointed President of the Corporate General Partner ~~and~~on ~~their~~November ~~principal~~6, ~~occupations~~2014 and ~~affiliations~~has ~~during~~been a member of the ~~last~~Board ~~five~~since ~~years~~August or2014. He ~~more~~is ~~are~~currently the President of Westmoreland Capital Corporation and an Executive Vice President at U.S. Energy Development Corporation, positions he has held since 2010 and 2013, respectively. Mr. Iak joined U.S. Energy Development Corporation in 2005, following a successful early career as ~~follows:~~a Vice President of an international money management firm, and bringing with him brokerage experience of managed business in excess of one billion dollars. He is a graduate of Canisius College.

~~Joseph~~Jordan M. Jayson, age 74, is Chairman, Director and sole stockholder of J. M. Jayson and Company, Inc. and certain of its affiliated companies: U.S. Apartments LLC, Westmoreland Capital Corporation, Oilmark Corporation and U.S. Energy Development Corporation. In addition, Mr. Jayson is Chairman of Realmark Corporation, Chairman, President and Treasurer of Realmark Properties, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of J. M. Jayson and Company, Inc. and co-general partner of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership, Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership-II, Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership-III, Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership-V, and Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership-VI A. Mr. Jayson has been in the real estate business for the last 49 years and is a Certified Property Manager as designated by the Institute of Real Estate Management (“I.R.E.M.”). Mr. Jayson received a B.S. Degree in Education in 1961 from Indiana University, a Masters Degree from the University of Buffalo in 1963, and has served on the educational faculty of the Institute of Real Estate Management. Mr. Jayson has for the last 49 years been engaged in various aspects of real estate brokerage and investment. He brokered residential properties from 1962 to 1964, commercial investment properties from 1964 to 1967, and in 1967 left commercial real estate to form his own investment firm. Since that time, Mr. Jayson and J. M. Jayson & Company, Inc. have formed or participated in various ways with forming over 30 real estate related limited partnerships. For the past 30 years, Mr. Jayson and an affiliate have also engaged in developmental drilling for gas and oil.

~~Judith P~~Mr. Jayson, age 7239, is ~~currently~~the ~~Vice~~Chief ~~President~~Executive ~~and~~Officer ~~a Director~~ of ~~Realmark Properties, Inc~~U. ~~She~~S. isEnergy ~~also~~Development Corporation, a ~~Director~~position ofhe ~~the~~has ~~property~~held ~~management~~since ~~affiliate,~~February ~~Realmark~~of ~~Corporation. Mrs.~~2014 ~~Jayson~~and has been ~~involved~~a inmember ~~property~~of ~~management for~~ the ~~last~~Board 40since ~~years~~August ~~and~~2014. ~~has~~Prior ~~extensive~~to ~~experience~~that indate, ~~the~~he ~~hiring~~held ~~and~~a ~~training~~number of ~~property~~other management ~~personnel~~positions ~~and~~since inhe ~~directing,~~joined ~~developing and implementing property management systems and programs~~U. ~~Mrs~~S. ~~Jayson,~~Energy ~~prior~~Development toCorporation ~~joining the firm~~ in ~~1973,~~2009. ~~taught~~Following ~~business~~his ingraduation ~~the~~from ~~Buffalo,~~Johns ~~New~~Hopkins ~~York~~University ~~High~~with ~~School~~a ~~System~~B. ~~Mrs~~A., Mr. Jayson ~~graduated~~worked ~~from~~in ~~St.~~the ~~Mary~~financial ofindustry ~~the~~in ~~Woods~~New ~~College~~York inand ~~Terre~~London ~~Haute,~~and ~~Indiana,~~has ~~with~~an aextensive ~~degree~~background in ~~Business~~portfolio ~~Administration~~management and trading.

Alan J. Laurita

Mr. Laurita, age 68, a partner at the law firm of Hodgson Russ LLP since 2011, has more than 40 years of experience as an attorney and former business executive in the oil and gas industry. He has been a member of the Board since August 2014. Mr. Laurita's practice includes assisting oil

~~Audit~~REALMARK ~~Committee~~PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

~~The~~ITEM ~~Partnership~~10: ~~has~~DIRECTORS aAND ~~separately-designated~~EXECUTIVE ~~standing~~OFFICERS ~~audit~~OF ~~committee~~THE ~~established~~REGISTRANT ~~in accordance with Section 3~~(acont'd)~~(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the audit committee are Joseph M. Jayson and Peter Minotti.~~

~~Audit~~and ~~Committee~~gas ~~Financial~~companies ~~Expert~~in the full range of their legal needs, representing larger landowners in connection with leasing property for oil and gas development, handling the sale and purchase of real property and representing lending institutions and borrowers in secured loan transactions. Mr. Laurita received both his B.S. in Business Administration and J.D. from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

~~The~~There ~~Directors~~was ~~and~~no ~~Executive~~prior ~~Officers~~arrangement ofor ~~the~~understanding ~~Corporate~~with ~~General~~any ~~Partner~~of ~~have~~these ~~determined~~directors ~~that~~pursuant ~~Peter~~to ~~Minotti~~which issuch andirector ~~audit~~was ~~committee~~selected ~~financial expert~~ as ~~defined~~a bydirector. ~~Item~~Mr. ~~401(h)~~Iak ofand ~~Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).~~ Mr. ~~Minotti~~Jayson isare ~~not~~brothers-in-law. ~~independent~~Messrs. ~~within~~Iak, ~~the~~Jayson ~~meaning~~and ofLaurita ~~Item~~all ~~7(d)(3)(iv)~~serve ofas ~~Schedule~~directors ~~14A~~ of ~~the~~Realmark ~~Exchange~~Property ~~Act~~Investors ~~due~~Limited ~~to limited circumstances, namely that the~~ Partnership is– ~~small~~II ~~in size~~ and ~~there~~Realmark isProperty ~~limited~~Investors ~~personnel. Mr.~~Limited ~~Minotti~~Partnership is– ~~not independent as a result of being a employee of an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner~~V.

Audit, Nominating and Compensation Committee Disclosures

Following Mr. Jayson's death on June 27, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner no longer maintained a separately-designated audit committee. The Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner also does not maintain nominating or compensation committees, or other similar committees. Consequently, the Board of Director of the Corporate General Partner does not have audit, nominating, or compensation committee charters. Functions customarily performed by such committees are performed by the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner as a whole as our operations are limited and we have a small number of officers and directors. We are not required to maintain such committees under the applicable rules of the OTC Bulletin Board, and the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner has no current plans to establish such committees. None of the directors of the Corporate General Partner qualify as an "audit committee financial expert."

Code of Ethics

The Partnership has adopted a code of ethics for the partners, principal financial officer, and employees of the Corporate General Partner or its affiliates who render services on behalf of the Partnership. The Partnership will provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics which is available from:

Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - VIA

Attention: Investor Relations

2350 North Forest Road

Getzville, New York 14068

ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

No direct remuneration was paid or payable by the Partnership to directors and officers (since it has no directors or officers), nor was any direct remuneration paid or payable by the Partnership to directors or officers of Realmark Properties, Inc., the Corporate General Partner and sponsor, for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 or 2013. The Corporate General Partner and its affiliate, Realmark Corporation, are entitled to fees and to certain expense reimbursements with respect to Partnership operations, as set forth in Item 13 hereof and in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

No person is known to the Partnership to own of record or beneficially, more than 5% of the units of limited partnership interests of the Partnership, except for affiliates of the general partners that own 10,288.6 units of limited partnership interest amounting to approximately 6.5% of the Partnership interest at December 31, ~~2012~~2014. The general partners and the executive officers of the Corporate General Partners, as of December 31, ~~2012~~2014, owned 90 units of limited partnership interest. The general partners and affiliates will receive their proportionate share, as limited partners, of any distributable proceeds from the sale of the properties.

ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The properties of the Partnership and its subsidiaries are managed by Realmark Corporation, an affiliate of the Partnership’'s corporate general partner, for a fee of generally 5% of annual net rental income of the properties. Realmark Corporation and the Corporate General Partner are also reimbursed for disbursements made on behalf of the Partnership. Those transactions are further described, and quantified, in the note to the consolidated financial statements entitled “"Related Party Transactions.”"

ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Engagement: FreedMaxick CPAs, P.C was engaged as the Partnership's independent auditor for 2014 and 2013 and Malin, Bergquist & Co., LLP was engaged as the Partnership’'s independent ~~auditors~~auditor for the ~~year~~first ~~2012~~three ~~and~~quarters ~~2011~~of 2013. All fees incurred for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013 were, to the Partnership's knowledge, approved by the ~~Audit~~Board ~~Committee~~of Directors of the Corporate General Partner on behalf of the Partnership in December of 2014.

Audit Fees: Audit fees for the audit of the Partnership’'s annual financial statement included in the Partnership’'s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q by Malin, Bergquist & Co., LLP for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 amounted to $6,000. Audit fees for ~~the~~ audit of the Partnership’'s annual financial ~~statement~~statements included in the Partnership’'s annual report on Form ~~10K~~10-K by ~~Malin,~~Freed ~~Bergquist~~Maxick &CPAs, CoP.,C. ~~LLP~~ for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and 2013 amounted to $38,500 and $18,333, respectively. EFP Rotenberg LLP was also paid $11,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and did not issue an audit report.

Audit-Related Fees: None.

Tax Fees: The Partnership engaged ~~Toski~~EFP ~~& Co.~~Rotenberg, ~~P.C.~~LLP to provide tax filing and compliance services during the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013. The fees for these services amounted to $4,~~435~~240 and $5,335 for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013, respectively.

All Other Fees: None.

The Audit Committee has set a policy that all fees incurred by the Partnership for services performed by its independent auditors must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. All fees related to 2012 and 2011 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee oversees the Partnership’s financial reporting process. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate the Partnership’s independent auditors and approves all fees paid to the independent auditors. During 2012 and 2011, the Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Partnership’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and the Partnership, including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board, and considered the scope and type of non-audit services provided by the auditor when reviewing the compatibility of those non-audit services with the auditors’ independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Partnership’s independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee meets with the independent auditors to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluations of the Partnership’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Partnership’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the General Partners (and the General Partners have approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES (cont'd)

All Other Fees: None.

For fiscal year 2014, the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner on behalf of the Partnership, to the Partnership's knowledge, set a policy that all other fees incurred by the Partnership for services performed by its independent auditors must be pre-approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner. No other fees related to the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013 were paid by the Partnership to its independent auditors.

The Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner oversees the Partnership's financial reporting process. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner reviewed the audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner has the sole authority to retain and terminate the Partnership's independent auditors and approves all fees paid to the independent auditors. The Board of Directors, with respect to 2014 and 2013, reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Partnership's accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner, under generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors' independence from management and the Partnership, including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board, and considered the scope and type of non-audit services provided by the auditor when reviewing the compatibility of those non-audit services with the auditors' independence.

The Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner discussed with the Partnership's independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Board of Directors of the Corporate General Partner meets with the independent auditors to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluations of the Partnership's internal controls, and the overall quality of the Partnership's financial reporting.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

PART IV

ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND SCHEDULES

ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND SCHEDULES

(a) Consolidated Financial Statements	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	F-1
Consolidated Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation as of December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-4 - F-9

(a) Consolidated Financial Statements		Page
Independent Auditors’ Report		F-1
Consolidated Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011		F-2
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011		F-3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-4

(b) Exhibits

2. Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation, or succession:

(a) Stipulation of Settlement Agreement dated August 29, 2001 filed as Exhibit 2a to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2002 is incorporated herein by reference. (File No. 000-17466)

(b) Order and Final Judgment Approving Settlement and Awarding Fees and Expenses dated November 29, 2001 isfiled as Exhibit 2b to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with SEC on April 15, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference. (File No. 000-17466)

4. Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures:

(a) Amended and Restated Agreement Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership filed with the Registration Statement of the Registrant on Form S-11, filed September 30, 1987, and subsequently amended, is incorporated herein by reference.

10. Material contracts:

(a) Property Management Agreement with Realmark Corporation ~~included~~filed with the Registration Statement, of the Registrant on Form S-11, offiled ~~the~~with ~~Registrant~~SEC ason ~~filed~~September 30, 1982 and amended to date, is incorporated herein by reference.

14. Code of Ethics filed December 31, 2003, isare incorporated herein by reference.

21.* ~~Subsidiaries~~Subsidiary of the Partnership is filed herewith.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND SCHEDULES (cont'd)

31.* Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is filed herewith.

32.* Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is ~~filed herewith.~~

101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

filed herewith.

101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

101.INS** XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

*	Filed herewith

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

1618

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VIA By: REALMARK PROPERTIES, INC. its Corporate General Partner

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

/s/ Matthew P. Iak		February 19, 2016
Matthew P. Iak,		Date
President

By: /s/Joseph M. Jayson		April 1, 2013
JOSEPH M. JAYSON,		Date
Individual General Partner

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: REALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.

/s/ Matthew P. Iak		February 19, 2016
Matthew P. Iak		Date
President and Director, (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Corporate General Partner

/s/ Jordan M. Jayson		February 19, 2016
Jordan M. Jayson,		Date
Director

/s/Joseph M. Jayson		April 1, 2013
/s/ Alan J. Laurita		February 19, 2016
JOSEPH M. JAYSON,		Date
Alan J. Laurita,		Date
President, Treasurer and Director
Director

/s/Judith P. Jayson		April 1, 2013
JUDITH P. JAYSON,		Date
Vice President and Director

17REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ~~PUBIC~~PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the ~~Board~~Partners of ~~Directors~~Realmark ~~and~~Property ~~Partners~~Investors ofLimited Partnership – VIA

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of net assets in liquidation of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership ~~– VI~~-A VIA (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of changes in net assets in liquidation for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

~~Getzville~~We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, ~~New~~nor ~~York~~were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

WeIn ~~have~~our ~~audited~~opinion, the ~~accompanying~~ consolidated financial statements ofreferred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership – ~~VI-A~~VIA ~~(the Company)~~ as of December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~December 31, 2013, and the ~~related consolidated statements of~~ changes in net assets in liquidation for the years then ended~~. The~~ ~~Company’s~~in ~~management~~conformity iswith ~~responsible for these consolidated financial statements~~U. ~~Our~~S. ~~responsibility~~generally isaccepted toaccounting ~~express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits~~principles.

WeAs ~~conducted~~discussed ~~our audits~~ in ~~accordance~~Note ~~with~~5 ~~the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit~~ to ~~obtain reasonable assurance about whether~~ the consolidated financial statements ~~are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have~~, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the ~~circumstances,~~Partnership ~~but~~has ~~not~~had ~~for~~numerous ~~the~~significant ~~purpose~~transactions ofwith ~~expressing~~businesses ancontrolled ~~opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly~~by, weand ~~express~~with nopeople ~~such~~who ~~opinion. An~~are ~~audit~~related ~~also includes examining~~to, ~~on a test basis, evidence supporting~~ the ~~amounts~~general ~~and disclosures in the financial statements~~partner, ~~assessing~~officers ~~the accounting principles used~~ and ~~significant~~directors ~~estimates~~of ~~made by management, as well as evaluating~~ the ~~overall financial statement presentation~~Partnership. ~~We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.~~

InFreed ~~our opinion~~Maxick, ~~the~~CPAs consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership – VI-A as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the changes in net assets in liquidation for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaP.C.

~~As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements~~Buffalo, ~~the~~New ~~entity has had numerous significant transactions with businesses controlled by, and with people who are related to, the general partner, officers and directors of the entity.~~York

~~Pittsburgh~~February 19, ~~Pennsylvania~~2016

April 1, 2013

F-1

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A
Consolidated Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation
(Liquidation Basis)
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Assets	2012	2011
Cash	$ 1,847	1,931
Receivable from affiliates	1,405,408	1,298,380
Equity interest in unconsolidated joint
venture	1,127,894	1,108,610
Total assets	2,535,149	2,408,921
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	358,120	354,347
Payable to affiliates	1,731,056	1,603,636
Total liabilities	2,089,176	1,957,983
Net assets in liquidation	$ 445,973	450,938
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation

(Liquidation Basis)

December 31, 2014 and 2013

		2014		2013
Assets
Cash	$	271	$	92
Receivable from affiliates		1,577,531		1,505,049
Equity interest in unconsolidated joint venture		1,231,695		1,190,589
Total assets	$	2,809,497	$	2,695,730

Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	374,006	$	359,058
Payable to affiliates		1,965,116		1,855,913
Total liabilities		2,339,122		2,214,971
Net assets in liquidation	$	470,375	$	480,759

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
for the Years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
Net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2010			771,062
Decrease during the period of liquidation			(320,124)
Net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2011			450,938
Decrease during the period of liquidation			(4,965)
Net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2012			$ 445,973
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation

For the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013

Net assets in liquidation at Beginning of period	$	480,759	$	445,973
Plus: Net Accrued Interest Receivable on Affiliated Balances		43,414		20,647
Less: Portfolio Management Fees		(10,882)		(16,626)
Less: Audit and Filing Fees		(44,790)		(29,905)
Less: Other expenses		(39,232)		(2,025)
Plus: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture		41,106		62,695

Net assets in liquidation at End of period	$	470,375	$	480,759

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

~~Notes~~Note to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013

(1) Liquidation of Partnership

In December of 2006 the Partnership sold ~~it’s~~its remaining property investment, and adopted a plan of termination under which obligations to non-affiliates will be paid and net proceeds will be distributed to the limited partners. This termination is expected upon liquidation of the unconsolidated joint venture, which is expected upon the collection of the note receivable from the affiliate.

As a result of the plan of termination and liquidation, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting to the liquidation basis effective January 1, 2007. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their estimated net realizable values, which is the non-discounted amount of cash, or its equivalent, into which an asset is expected to be converted in the due course of business, including direct costs, and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts. There was no specific accrual made for costs expected to be incurred during liquidation as their net impact on results is considered immaterial to the amount of net interest and joint venture income accrued each year.

(2) Formation and Operation of Partnership

Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership-VI A (the Partnership) is a Delaware limited partnership formed on September 21, 1987, to invest in a diversified portfolio of income-producing real estate investments.

In 1987 and 1988, the Partnership sold, through a public offering, 157,378 units of limited partnership interest, including 30 units held by an affiliate of the general partners, for $15,737,790. ~~The~~At December 31, 2013, the general partners ~~are~~were Realmark Properties, Inc. (the Corporate General Partner) and Joseph M. Jayson (the Individual General Partner) who iswas the sole stockholder of J.M. Jayson & Company, Inc. Realmark Properties, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of J.M. Jayson & Company, Inc. Joseph M. Jayson passed away on June 27, 2014. A successor Individual General Partner was not appointed following Mr. Jayson's death.

Under the partnership agreement, the general partners and their affiliates can receive compensation for services rendered and reimbursement for expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership (note 5).

(3)	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Basis of Accounting and Consolidation As a result of the plan of termination and liquidation, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting from the going concern basis to the liquidation basis effective January 1, 2007. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts.

~~The~~As ~~accompanying~~a ~~consolidated~~result ~~financial~~of ~~statements include~~ the ~~accounts~~plan of termination and liquidation, the Partnership ~~and~~changed its ~~four~~basis ~~dormant~~of ~~subsidiaries~~accounting from the going concern basis to the liquidation basis effective January 1, ~~that~~2007. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are ~~wholly-owned:~~stated at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts.

F-4

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A ~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued~~

~~(3)~~Note ~~Summary~~to ofConsolidated ~~Significant~~Financial ~~Accounting Policies, Continued~~Statements

~~(a)~~December ~~Basis~~31, of2014 ~~Accounting~~ and ~~Consolidation, Continued~~2013

(1)	Realmark - Columbia, LLC
(2)	Realmark - Beaver, LLC

(3)	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd)

(3)	Realmark - Countrybrook, LLC
(4)	Realmark - Stonegate, LLC

(a)	Basis of Accounting and Consolidation (cont'd)

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and its four dormant subsidiaries that are wholly-owned:

(1)	Realmark - Columbia, LLC
(2)	Realmark - Beaver, LLC
(3)	Realmark - Countrybrook, LLC
(4)	Realmark - Stonegate, LLC

In consolidation, all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

(b) Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~(c)~~The ~~Cash~~preparation ~~and~~of ~~Equivalents~~financial ~~Cash~~statements ~~and~~in ~~equivalents~~conformity ~~include~~with ~~money~~generally ~~market~~accepted ~~accounts~~accounting principles requires management to make estimates and ~~any~~assumptions ~~highly~~that ~~liquid~~affect ~~debt~~certain ~~instruments~~reported ~~purchased~~amounts ~~with~~and adisclosures. ~~maturity~~Accordingly, ofactual ~~three~~results ~~months~~could ordiffer ~~less~~from those estimates.

(dc) Receivables and Bad Debt The Partnership uses the allowance method for uncollectible accounts. Charges to this account are made on a case-by-case basis. Increases or decreases to the allowance are charged to bad debt expense. There was no bad debt expense or allowance for doubtful accounts in 2012 and 2011.

~~(e)~~The ~~Unconsolidated~~Partnership ~~Joint~~uses ~~Venture~~the ~~The~~allowance ~~Partnership’s~~method ~~investment~~for inuncollectible ~~Research~~accounts. ~~Triangle~~Charges ~~Joint~~to ~~Venture~~this isaccount anare ~~unconsolidated~~made ~~joint~~on ~~venture~~a ~~which~~case-by-case isbasis. ~~accounted~~Increases ~~for~~or ondecreases to the ~~equity~~allowance ~~method.~~are ~~This~~charged ~~Joint~~to ~~Venture~~bad isdebt ~~not~~expense. ~~consolidated~~There inwas ~~the~~no ~~Partnership’s~~bad ~~financial~~debt ~~statements~~expense ~~because~~or ~~the~~allowance ~~Partnership~~for isdoubtful ~~not~~accounts ~~the~~in ~~majority~~2014 ~~owner~~and 2013.

(fd) ~~Long-Lived~~Unconsolidated ~~Assets~~Joint The Partnership reviews its long-lived assets for impairments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. For assets held and used, if the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their carrying amount, an impairment loss has occurred. This amount of the impairment loss is equal to the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. No impairment loss has been recognized by the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.Venture

~~(g)~~The ~~Per~~Partnership's ~~Unit~~investment ~~Data~~in ~~Per~~Research ~~limited~~Triangle ~~partnership~~Joint ~~unit~~Venture ~~data~~is an unconsolidated joint venture which is ~~based~~accounted for on the ~~weighted~~equity ~~average~~method. ~~number~~This ofJoint ~~limited~~Venture ~~partnership~~is ~~units~~not ~~outstanding~~consolidated ~~for~~in the ~~year~~Partnership's financial statements because the Partnership is not the controlling owner.

(he) Fair Value of Financial Instruments ~~The fair value of the Partnership’s financial instruments approximated their carrying values.~~

Due to their short-term nature and interest rates that approximate market rates, the fair value of the Partnership's financial instruments approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

(f)	Income Allocation and Distributable Cash Flow

The partnership agreement provides that income not arising from sale and refinancing activities and all partnership losses are to be allocated 97% to the limited partners and 3% to the general partners. Partnership income arising from sale or refinancing activities is allocated in the same proportion as distributions or distributable cash from sale proceeds. In the event there is no distributable cash from sale proceeds, taxable income will be allocated 87% to the limited partners and 13% to the general partners. The above is subject to tax laws that were applicable at the time of the formation of the Partnership and may be adjusted due to subsequent changes in the Internal Revenue Code.

F-5

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

~~Notes~~Note to Consolidated Financial Statements~~, Continued~~

~~(3)~~December ~~Summary~~31, of2014 ~~Significant~~and ~~Accounting Policies, Continued~~2013

(if) Income Allocation and Distributable Cash Flow The partnership agreement provides that income not arising from sale and refinancing activities and all partnership losses are to be allocated 97% to the limited partners and 3% to the general partners. Partnership income arising from sale or refinancing activities is allocated in the same proportion as distributions or distributable cash from sale proceeds. In the event there is no distributable cash from sale proceeds, taxable income will be allocated 87% to the limited partners and 13% to the general partners. The above is subject to tax laws that were applicable at the time of the formation of the Partnership and may be adjusted due to subsequent changes in the Internal Revenue Code.(cont'd)

The partnership agreement also provides for the distribution to the partners of net cash flow from operations. In connection with the pending sale of the Partnership’'s properties (note 6), it is anticipated that there will be no future distributions of net cash flow from operations. Sale or refinancing proceeds are distributed to the extent available, 100% to the limited partners until there has been a return of the limited partner’'s capital contribution plus an amount sufficient to provide a 7%, not compounded, return on their adjusted capital contributions for all years following the termination of the offering of the units. It is anticipated that there will ~~not~~ be sufficient cash flow ~~from~~following ~~the~~re-payment of a loan made by our joint venture upon sale of ~~the~~a ~~Partnership’s~~property ~~remaining~~by ~~properties~~an toaffiliate ~~provide~~and ~~this~~our ~~return~~collection toof ~~the~~a ~~limited~~corresponding ~~partners.~~receivable ~~There~~to ~~was~~provide asome ~~$300,000~~or ~~distribution~~all ~~made~~of this return to the limited partners in ~~2011~~calendar year 2016. There were no distributions to partners made in ~~2012~~2014 or 2013.

(jg) Income Taxes In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASC 740-10-50 (FASB Interpretation No. 48 “FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which prescribed a comprehensive model for how a company should measure, recognize, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. The effective date for ASC 740-10-50 for entities other than public entities was revised to years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted ASC 740-10-50 as of January 1, 2009 and, thereafter, recognizes the tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. There was no impact to the Company’s financial statements as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10-50. Interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters, if incurred, are recognized as a component of income tax expense. The Company’s income tax filings are subject to audit by various taxing authorities. The Company’s open audit periods are 2009-2011.

As a limited partnership, the Company's taxable income or loss is allocated to members in accordance with their respective percentage ownership. Therefore, no provision or liability for income taxes has been included in the financial statements.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Company and recognize a tax liability if the Company has taken an uncertain position that more likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. Management evaluated the Company's tax positions and concluded that the Company had taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the financial statements to comply with the provisions of this guidance. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by the U.S. federal, state, or local tax authorities for years before 2011.

(4) Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

The Partnership has a 50% interest in a Joint Venture in Realmark Research, LLC. (also known as Research Triangle Industrial Park Joint Venture) with Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - II (RPILP - II), an entity affiliated through common general partners. The Joint Venture owned and operated the Research Triangle Industrial Park West, an office/warehouse facility complex in Durham, North Carolina, which was sold in 2008. Upon sale, the proceeds were loaned to another entity affiliated through common general partners. The Joint Venture agreement provides that any income, loss, gain, cash flow, or sale proceeds be allocated 50% to the Partnership and 50% to RPILP - II.

F-6

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

~~Notes~~Note to Consolidated Financial Statements~~, Continued~~

~~(3)~~December ~~Summary~~31, of2014 ~~Significant~~and ~~Accounting Policies, Continued~~2013

(k4) ~~Reclassifications~~Investment ~~Certain amounts on the statement of net assets~~ in ~~liquidation~~Unconsolidated ~~that~~Joint ~~were~~Venture netted in the prior year, have been reclassified to reflect a gross presentation. This change had no effect on previously reported net assets in liquidation, or decrease during the period of net asset in liquidation.(cont'd)

(4) Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

Summary financial information of the Joint Venture follows:

Balance Sheet Information

	December 31,
Assets	2014		2013
Cash	$	722	$	1,181
Receivables from affiliates		1,956,635		1,958,468
Accrued interest receivable from affiliate		676,033		591,529
Total Assets	$	2,633,390	$	2,551,178
Liabilities and Partners' Equity
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Payable to affiliates	$	170,000	$	170,000
Total Liabilities		170,000		170,000
Partners' Equity
The Partnership		1,231,695		1,190,589
RPILP - II		1,231,695		1,190,589
Total Partners' Equity		2,463,390		2,381,178
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity	$	2,633,390	$	2,551,178

~~The~~Operating Partnership has a 50% interest in a Joint Venture with Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - II (RPILP - II), an entity affiliated through common general partners. The Joint Venture owned and operated the Research Triangle Industrial Park West, an office/warehouse facility complex in Durham, North Carolina, which was sold in 2006. The Joint Venture agreement provides that any income, loss, gain, cash flow, or sale proceeds be allocated 50% to the Partnership and 50% to RPILP - II.Information

Summary financial information of the Joint Venture follows:

	Years ended December 31,
	2014		2013
Income - interest	$	84,504	$	126,756
Expenses
Administrative		2,292		1,366
Net Income		82,212		125,390
Allocation of Net income
The partnership		41,106		62,695
RPILP - II		41,106		62,695
Total	$	82,212	$	125,390

Balance Sheet Information
	December 31,
Assets	2012	2011
Cash and Equivalents	$ 1,147	$ 488,152
Receivables from affiliates	1,789,868	1,524,869
Accrued interest receivable from affiliate	464,773	422,521
Total Assets	2,255,788	2,435,542
Liabilities and Partners' Equity
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Payable to afilliiates	-	218,322
Total Liabilities	-	218,322
Partners Equity
The Partnership	1,127,894	1,108,610
RPILP - II	1,127,894	1,108,610
Total Partners Equity	$ 2,255,788	$ 2,217,220
Total liabilities and Partners Equity	$ 2,255,788	$ 2,435,542

A reconciliation of the Partnership's investment in Research Triangle Industrial Park Joint Venture is as follows:

	2014		2013
Investment in Joint Venture at beginning of year	$	1,190,589	$	1,127,894
Allocated net income		41,106		62,695
Investment in Joint Venture at end of year	$	1,231,695	$	1,190,589

F-7

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

~~Notes~~Note to Consolidated Financial Statements~~, Continued~~

~~(4)~~December ~~Investment~~31, in2014 ~~Unconsolidated~~and ~~Joint Venture, Continued~~2013

Operating Information
	Years ended December 31,
	2012	2011
Income - interest	$ 42,301	$ 84,526
Expenses
Property operations
Interest	538	19
Administrative	3,195	1,877
Total Expenses	3,733	1,896
Net Income	38,568	82,630
Allocation of Net income
The partnership	19,284	41,315
RPILP - II	19,284	41,315
Total	$ 38,568	$ 82,630

(4) Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture (cont'd)

A reconciliation of the Partnership’s investment in Research Triangle Industrial Park Joint Venture is as follows:
	2012	2011
Investment in Joint Venture at beginning of year	$ 1,108,610	$ 1,067,295
Allocated net income	19,284	41,315
Equity interest in excess of investment
at end of year	$ 1,127,894	$ 1,108,610

Memorandum of Understanding

The Partnership has a 50% interest in the unconsolidated joint venture in Realmark Research, LLC (known as Research Triangle Industrial Park West). Realmark Research, LLC (Research) advanced a portion of its sales proceeds in the amount of $1,066,719 to an affiliate under a Memorandum of Understanding Agreement dated December 8, 2006. Accrued interest on the amount advanced as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $676,034 and 591,529; respectively. Under the terms of this agreement, the affiliate agrees to repay this loan plus interest at a rate of 8% per annum, upon the sale of a remaining property, which is currently being marketed for sale.

(5)	Related Party Transactions

The Corporate General Partner and its affiliates earn fees, principally for partnership management and are reimbursed for services rendered to the Partnership, as provided for in the partnership agreement. Reimbursement for cost of services to the Partnership include investor relations, professional fees, communications, supplies, accounting, printing, postage and other items amounted to $10,882 and $16,626 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership has receivables from affiliates amounting to $1,577,531 and $1,505,049, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership has payables to affiliates amounting to $1,965,116 and $1,855,913, respectively. Of these amounts payable to affiliates, $900,333 was payable to the Partnership's unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership has equity interest in the unconsolidated joint venture of $1,231,695 and $1,190,589, respectively. The Partnership recorded net interest income on amounts due to and from affiliated parties for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 in the amounts of approximately $43,000 and $20,000, respectively.

Certain receivables from and payables to affiliated parties are due on demand and bear interest at 8% in 2014 and 2013.

Distributions

U.S. Apartments, LLC, is an affiliated company in which the estate of the Individual General Partner of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - VI A is the sole member. U.S. Apartments, LLC owns 9,811.1 units of limited partnership interest.

F-8

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

~~Notes~~Note to Consolidated Financial Statements~~, Continued~~

~~(5)~~December ~~Related~~31, ~~Party~~2014 ~~Transactions~~and 2013

The Corporate General Partner and its affiliates earn fees, principally for property and partnership management and are reimbursed for services rendered to the Partnership, as provided for in the partnership agreement. Reimbursement for cost of services to the Partnership for cost of services to the Partnership that include investor relations, marketing of properties, professional fees, communications, supplies, accounting, printing, postage and other items amounted to $13,500 and $11,847 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.

In addition to the above, other properties specific expenses such as payroll, benefits, etc. are charged to property operations on the Partnership’s consolidated statements of operations. Certain receivables from and payables to affiliated parties are due on demand and bear interest at 8% in 2012 and 2011.

Property Disposition Fees According to the terms of the partnership agreement, the general partners are also allowed to collect a property disposition fee upon sale of acquired properties. This fee is not to exceed the lesser of 50% of amounts customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services for comparable properties or 3% of the sales price. The property disposition fee is subordinate to payments to the limited partners of a cumulative annual return (not compounded) equal to 7% of their average adjusted capital balances and to repayment to the limited partners of an amount equal to their original capital contributions. Since these conditions described above have not been met, no disposition fees have been paid or accrued on properties sold in prior years.

Distributions U.S. Apartments, LLC, is an affiliated company in which the Individual General Partner of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - VI A is the sole member. U.S. Apartments, LLC owns 9,811.1 units of limited partnership interest.

Memorandum of Understanding The Partnership has a 50% interest in the unconsolidated joint venture in Realmark Research, LLC (know as Research Triangle Industrial Park West). Realmark Research, LLC (Research) advanced a portion of its sales proceeds in the amount of $1,066,719 to an affiliate under a Memorandum of Understanding Agreement dated December 8, 2006. Under the terms of this agreement, the affiliate agrees to repay this loan plus interest at a rate of 8% per annum, upon the sale of a remaining property, which is currently being marketed for sale.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership has receivables from affiliates amounting to $1,405,409 and $1,298,380, respectively. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership has payables to affiliates amounting to $1,731,056 and $1,603,635, respectively. Of these amounts payable to affiliates, $731,733 and $467,584 were payable to the Partnership's unconsolidated joint venture as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Partnership has equity interest in unconsolidated joint venture of $1,127,894 and $1,108,610, respectively.

F-9

REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - VI A

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Continued

(6) Settlement of Lawsuit

As previously reported, the Partnership, as a nominal defendant, the general partners of the Partnership and of affiliated public partnerships (the “"Realmark Partnerships”") and the officers and directors of the Corporate General Partner, as defendants, had been involved in a class action litigation at the state court level regarding the payment of fees and other management issues. On August 29, 2001, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Settlement"). On October 4, 2001, the Court issued an "Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement" (the "Hearing Order") and on November 29, 2001, the court issued an "Order and Final Judgment Approving Settlement and Awarding Fees and Expenses" and dismissing the complaints with prejudice. The Settlement provided, among other things, that:

On August 29, 2001, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Settlement”). On October 4, 2001, the Court issued an “Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement” (the “Hearing Order”) and on November 29, 2001, the court issued an “Order and Final Judgment Approving Settlement and Awarding Fees and Expenses” and dismissing the complaints with predjudice. The Settlement provided, among other things, that:

●

The payable to the general partners and/or their affiliates by Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - VI A at March 31, 2001, in the amount of $481,598, cease to accrue interest.

●

● The ~~payable~~settlement also provided for the payment by the Partnerships of fees to the ~~general~~plaintiffs' ~~partners~~attorneys. These payments, which have been estimated and~~/or~~ ~~their~~accrued ~~affiliates~~for on our financial statements, are payable out of the proceeds from the sale of all of the properties owned by all of the Realmark ~~Property~~Partnerships, ~~Investors~~following ~~Limited~~the sale of the last of these properties in each partnership. Plaintiffs' counsel will receive 15% of the amount by which the sales proceeds distributable to limited partners in each partnership exceeds the value of the limited partnership units in each partnership (based on the weighted average of the units' trading prices on the secondary market as reported by Partnership -Spectrum VIfor Athe atperiod ~~March~~May ~~31,~~through June 2001,). inIn no event may the ~~amount~~increase on which the fees are calculated exceed 100% of ~~$481,598,~~the ~~cease~~market tovalue ~~accrue~~of ~~interest~~the units as calculated above.

The settlement also provided for the payment by the Partnerships of fees to the plaintiffs’attorneys. These payments, which are not calculable at this time but may be significant, arepayable out of the proceeds from the sale of all of the properties owned by all of theRealmark Partnerships, following the sale of the last of these properties in each partnership. Plaintiffs’ counsel will receive 15% of the amount by which the sales proceeds distributable to limited partners in each partnership exceeds the value of the limited partnership units in each partnership (based on the weighted average of the units’ trading prices on the secondary market as reported by Partnership Spectrum for the period May through June 2001). In no event may the increase on which the fees are calculated exceed 100% of the market value of the units as calculated above.

F-10

Filing Compare · REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VI-A