UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-24976

(Mark One)

CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware		93-1161833
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
805 SW Broadway, Suite 1500, Portland, Oregon		97205-3339
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 503-274-2300

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-24976

CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		93-1161833
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

805 SW Broadway Street, Suite 1500, Portland, Oregon		97205
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 503-274-2300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Units		30,527,030
(Class)		(Outstanding at ~~November~~May 724, ~~2003~~2004)

CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (~~Unaudited~~unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
	Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
	Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Signatures
Item 5.	Other Information
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures

PART I. 1- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item . 1. Financial Statements

Crown Pacific Partners, L.P.

(Debtor-in-~~Posession~~Possession)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except unit and per unit data)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Revenues	$	8982,~~253~~547		$	8666,~~261~~113
Operating costs:
Cost of products sold	8169,~~595~~511			7860,~~475~~507
Loss on timber purchase commitments	5,651			3,757
Gain on disposal of assets	(18		)	(485		)
Loss on disposal of assets	19			1,174
Selling, general and administrative expenses	5,404			5,347
Selling, general and administrative expenses	6,012			6,962
Operating income	7,650			744
Operating loss	(4,024		)	(4,107		)
Interest expense (excluding contractual interest expense of $12,736 and $0)	268			11,952
Interest expense (excluding contractual interest expense of $11,710 and $0)	254			12,482
Amortization of debt issuance costs	468			423
Amortization of debt issuance costs	468			499
Other income, net	(54		)	(129		)
Other (income) expense, net	(111		)	22
Income (loss) from operations before reoganization items	6,968			(11,502		)
Loss from continuing operations before reorganization items	(4,635		)	(17,110		)
Reorganization items:
Professional fees	(12,~~720~~015		)	—
Other	(~~264~~108		)	—
	(1,984		)	—
	(2,123		)	—
Loss before discontinued operations	(6,619		)	(17,110		)
Income (loss) before discontinued operations	4,845			(11,502		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	~~(33~~480		)	~~366~~(5,013		)
Net loss	$	(6,652	)	$	(16,744	)
Net income (loss).	$	5,325		$	(16,515	)
Basic and diluted loss per limited partner unit before discontinued operations	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.55	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per limited partner unit before discontinued operations	$	—		$	(0.37	)
Basic and diluted income per limited partner unit from discontinued operations	$	—		$	0.01
Basic and diluted income (loss) per limited partner unit from discontinued operations	—			(0.17		)
Basic and diluted net loss per limited partner unit	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.54	)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per limited partner unit	$	—		$	(0.54	)
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding	30,527,030			30,527,030
Weighted average units outstanding.	30,527,030			30,527,030

~~See~~The accompanying ~~Notes~~ tonotes ~~Consolidated~~are ~~Financial~~an ~~Statements~~integral part of these financial statements.

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002
Revenues	$	241,864		$	245,319
Operating costs:
Cost of products sold	221,600			220,169
Loss on timber purchase commitments	6,064			3,757
Gain on sale of assets held for sale	—			(7,449		)
Loss on disposition of assets	803			1,174
Selling, general and administrative expenses	18,957			20,082
Debt restructuring negotiation costs	4,860			—
Operating income (loss)	(10,420		)	7,586
Interest expense (excluding contractual interest expense of $11,710 and $0)	24,274			39,703
Debt restructuring and redemption premium	—			14,133
Amortization of debt issuance costs	1,531			2,189
Other income, net	(216		)	(433		)
Loss from continuing operations before reorganization items	(36,009		)	(48,006		)
Reorganization items:
Professional fees	(1,720		)	—
Valuation adjustment on debt issuance costs	(218		)	—
Other	(264		)	—
	(2,202		)	—
Loss before discontinued operations	(38,211		)	(48,006		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	(5,859		)	1,151
Net loss	$	(44,070	)	$	(46,855	)
Basic and diluted loss per limited partner unit before discontinued operations	$	(1.09	)	$	(1.56	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per limited partner unit from discontinued operations	$	(0.19	)	$	0.04
Basic and diluted net loss per limited partner unit	$	(1.28	)	$	(1.52	)
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding	30,527,030			30,527,030

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Crown Pacific Partners, L.P.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except unit data)

(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
	March 31, 2004			December 31, 2003
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	87,~~808~~897		$	1211,~~993~~028
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,903 and $1,655	41,255			39,833
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $927 and $862	41,315			43,993
Notes receivable	~~2,339~~528			~~2,540~~558
Inventories	2423,~~082~~093			3327,~~385~~943
Deposits on timber cutting contracts	1,~~293~~206			~~1,135~~516
Prepaid and other current assets	11,660			4,053
Assets held for sale	14,286			—
Total current assets	89,437			93,939
Prepaid and other current assets	13,252			12,305
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $46,201 and $42,609	45,731			53,484
Total current assets	101,577			96,343
Timber, timberlands and roads, net	403,000			413,987
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $43,896 and $44,390	40,007			41,476
Goodwill	28,770			34,272
Timber, timberlands and roads, net	300,763			302,737
Other assets	145,~~227~~462			175,~~283~~930
Total assets	$	~~581~~447,~~165~~809		$	~~612~~446,~~965~~486
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Liabilities and Partners’ Deficit
Liabilities not subject to compromise:
Current liabilities:
Revolving credit facility	$	2018,~~456~~346		$	2623,~~000~~370
Accounts payable	75,~~695~~899			104,~~766~~291
Accrued expenses	9,~~940~~395			79,~~886~~194
Accrued interest	—			7,798
Liabilities held for sale	838			—
Current portion of long-term debt	994			~~10,009~~123
Total current liabilities	3834,~~100~~572			6236,~~459~~978
Long-term debt	9053			~~503,181~~86
Other non-current liabilities	270			~~9,170~~270
Liabilities subject to compromise	547,551			—
	34,895			37,334
Total liabilities	586,011			574,810
Liabilities subject to compromise	545,640			547,203
Partners’ capital:
Total liabilities	580,535			584,537
General partners	(4,846		)	(906		)
Partners’ deficit:
Limited partners (30,527,030 units outstanding at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002)	—			39,061
General partners	(132,726		)	(138,051		)
Total partners’ capital	(4,846		)	38,155
Limited partners (30,527,030 units outstanding at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003)	—			—
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	581,165		$	612,965
Total partners’ deficit	(132,726		)	(138,051		)
Total liabilities and partners’ deficit	$	447,809		$	446,486

~~See~~The accompanying ~~Notes~~ tonotes ~~Consolidated~~are ~~Financial~~an ~~Statements~~integral part of these financial statements.

Crown Pacific Partners, L.P.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(44,070	)	$	(46,855	)
Net income (loss)	$	5,325		$	(16,515	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depletion, depreciation and amortization	175,~~021~~020			246,~~214~~110
Reorganization related valuation adjustment on debt issuance costs	218			—
Deferred interest	—			1,168
Redemption premium and write off of deferred charges	—			9,967
Impairment of goodwill	—			5,502
Deferred interest	2,402			2,030
Loss on purchase commitments	—			149
Loss on timber purchase commitments	6,064			3,757
Gain on disposal of assets	(18		)	(479		)
Impairment of goodwill	5,502			—
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets	799			(6,385		)
Net change in current assets and current liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable	~~199~~(6,945		)	~~16,123~~(570		)
Inventories	~~4,838~~917			(15,~~091~~299		)
Deposits on timber cutting contracts	(~~158~~690		)	~~(467~~105		)
Prepaid and other current assets	(71,~~910~~646		)	(~~2,604~~386		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	152,~~472~~560			~~(15~~3,~~021~~321		)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities	377			(16,332		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	4,523			(6,894		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to timberlands	(41,~~178~~001		)	(51,~~254~~389		)
Additions to timber cutting rights	(~~650~~10		)	(~~476~~529		)
Additions to equipment	(~~1,176~~97		)	(~~2,812~~637		)
Proceeds from sales of assets	7,157			186,180
Proceeds from sale of assets	18			641
Principal payments received on notes	67			3,237
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,090		)	(1,914		)
Other investing activities	—			(15		)
Net cash provided by investing activities	1,220			180,860
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings	(5,544		)	3,000
Net increase (decrease) in revolving credit facility	(5,024		)	1,000
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	—			156
Repayments of long-term debt	(1,540		)	(22		)
Repayments of long-term debt	(60		)	(154,477		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(6,564		)	978
Change in restricted cash	—			(15,337		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(3,131		)	(7,830		)
Other financing activities	(178		)	(4,765		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	11,028			12,993
Net cash used by financing activities	(5,782		)	(171,423		)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	7,897		$	5,163
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(4,185		)	(6,895		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	12,993			9,219
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,808		$	2,324
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for reorganization items	$	~~644~~1,393		$	—
Cash paid for interest	$	~~8,627~~268		$	367,~~817~~891

~~See~~The accompanying ~~Notes~~ tonotes ~~Consolidated~~are ~~Financial~~an ~~Statements~~integral part of these financial statements.

CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P.

(Debtor-in-Possession)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1: Organization and Basis of Presentation

Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. (~~“Crown Pacific” or~~ the “Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership, through its 99% owned subsidiary, Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), was formed in 1994 to acquire, own and operate timberlands and wood product manufacturing facilities located in the Northwest United States. The Partnership’s business consists primarily of growing and harvesting timber for sale as logs in domestic and export markets and the manufacturing, selling and distribution of lumber and other wood products.

During the second quarter of 2003, the Partnership was unable to meet the financial covenants and scheduled interest payments pursuant to its bank loan and senior note agreements. In addition, the Partnership was unable to successfully negotiate a recapitalization with its bank lenders and senior note holders. ~~Accordingly~~ Therefore, on June 29, 2003, the Partnership and all but one of its subsidiaries, Klamath Northern Railway, Co., each filed voluntary petitions for relief under ~~chapter~~Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix, Arizona (the “Bankruptcy Court”), case numbers 03-11258-PHX-RJH through 03-11263-PHX-RJH. These cases are jointly administered under case number 03-11258-PHX-RJH. The Partnership and its subsidiaries currently manage their properties and operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. See Note 2 below.

The ~~accompanying~~ ~~consolidated~~Partnership ~~financial~~has ~~statements~~experienced ~~have~~net ~~been~~losses ~~prepared~~in thirteen ~~assuming~~of ~~that~~ the ~~Partnership~~last ~~will~~fourteen ~~continue~~fiscal asquarters, and would have reported a ~~going~~net loss ~~concern,~~in ~~which~~the ~~assumes~~current ~~continuity~~quarter if $12.7 million of contractual interest expense ~~operations~~had ~~and~~been ~~realization~~recognized. ofThe ~~assets~~accompanying ~~and~~consolidated ~~satisfaction~~financial ofstatements ~~liabilities~~have been inprepared assuming that the ~~ordinary~~ ~~course~~Partnership ofwill ~~business~~continue ~~and~~as a going concern, and in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7 (“SOP 90-7”), “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code.” As a result of the ~~chapter~~Chapter 11 filing, there is no assurance that the carrying amounts of assets will be realized or that the liabilities will be settled for the amounts recorded. Until a plan of ~~The~~reorganization is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the Partnership ~~has~~is ~~experienced~~not able ~~net~~to ~~losses~~determine inthe ~~each~~ultimate disposition of ~~the~~its ~~last~~assets ~~twelve fiscal~~and ~~quarters~~liabilities. ~~The~~All ~~consolidated~~significant intercompany transactions ~~financial~~and ~~statements~~balances dohave ~~not~~been ~~reflect~~eliminated ~~any~~in ~~adjustments~~consolidation. Certain ~~that~~prior ~~might~~period ~~result~~reclassifications ~~should the~~have ~~Partnership~~been bemade ~~unable~~to conform to ~~continue~~the ascurrent aperiod ~~going concern~~presentation.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets to be held and used are accounted for at their historical cost, unless they are determined to be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized “only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows…” The Partnership’s property, plant and equipment and timber, timberlands and roads are all considered to be long-lived assets to be held and used within the meaning of SFAS No. 144. Accordingly, such assets are carried at their historical cost, because the carrying amount of such assets does not exceed the estimated undiscounted cash flows from such assets. Given the uncertainties of the chapter 11 process, there can be no assurances that the Partnership, despite its best efforts, will continue to operate these long-lived assets and classify them as held and used and that the carrying amounts of these assets will be fully realized.

As part of the Partnership’s bankruptcy proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court approved a debtor-in-possession financing agreement (“DIP Revolver”) in the amount of $40 million that the Partnership has arranged with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. During the reorganization process, vendors who deliver goods and provide services to the Partnership receive priority payment protection under the bankruptcy law for such obligations. Obligations that arose prior to June 29, 2003 are included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise. See also Notes 2, 4 and 5.

The financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are unaudited and reflect the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Partnership. These financial statements include all the accounts of the Partnership but do not contain all of the information required by generally accepted accounting

principles to be included in a full set of financial statements. The financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements in the Partnership’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes a summary of significant accounting policies of the Partnership. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 have been included. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year. Separate condensed combined financial statements for the entities under chapter 11 protection are not presented because they are not significantly different from the consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization

During the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2003~~2004, the following occurred under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court:

• ~~The~~Negotiations ~~Bankruptcy~~on a ~~Court~~consensual ~~approved~~plan of re-organization with representatives of the ~~DIP~~senior ~~Revolver~~note holders ~~(see~~and ~~Note~~acquisition 4)facility banks continued.

• AnA ~~unsecured~~marketing process ~~creditors~~was ~~committee~~initiated ~~was~~regarding the Partnership’s Manufacturing Segment and ~~formed~~Alliance Lumber Segment assets.

• ~~Certain~~On March 24, of2004, the ~~acquisition~~Bankruptcy ~~facility creditors~~Court ~~filed~~approved a motion ~~for~~to ~~lift~~dispose of the Partnership’s ~~automatic~~Alliance ~~stay~~Lumber ~~and~~Segment tooperations ~~proceed~~in ~~with~~Las ~~the foreclosure~~Vegas, ~~process on collateral~~Nevada. ~~A hearing~~See ~~date~~Note ~~is set for December 2, 2003 on this issue~~10.

Although the Partnership has filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, it continues to actively pursue a recapitalization plan. Any recapitalization plan will be subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court and may involve the disposition of certain Partnership assets. The creditors on the acquisition facility and senior notes assert that their debt is ~~secured~~collateralized by the Partnership’s timberlands and certain real property and equipment associated with its ~~manufacturing~~ ~~segment~~Manufacturing Segment. The remaining liabilities subject to compromise are generally unsecured. ~~While~~The Chapter 11 filing constitutes a default or event of default under a number of the company’s debt, lease and other contractual relationships. While the Partnership is under bankruptcy protection, any scheduled interest or principal payments ~~are~~on debt are deferred and creditors are generally prohibited from pursuing collection of their pre-petition claims by the automatic stay provisions of the ~~Bankruptcy~~ Bankruptcy Code. In accordance with SOP 90-7, the Partnership discontinued accruing interest on its term debt ~~effective~~ effective June 30, 2003, because it is not probable it will be paid during the bankruptcy proceedings or be an allowed claim. An additional $1112.7 million of interest expense would have been recognized toin ~~date~~the first quarter of 2004 if not for the ~~chapter~~Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. ~~See also Note 5.~~

~~Note 3: Inventories~~5

~~All~~On ~~inventories~~November 10, ~~are~~2003, a hearing was held in the Bankruptcy Court ~~stated~~on ata motion from the ~~lower~~Partnership, which was opposed by the creditors, to extend the period of ~~average~~exclusivity ~~cost~~in orwhich ~~market~~only the Partnership may present a plan of reorganization to the Bankruptcy Court. ~~Inventories~~At ~~consisted~~the hearing, the Bankruptcy Court denied the Partnership’s motion, thereby ending the period within which the Partnership had the exclusive right to propose a reorganization plan. The Partnership is negotiating with the major creditor constituents in its Chapter 11 proceedings, and has begun to pursue a process by which the Partnership’s assets and operations will be sold or otherwise divested in order to satisfy creditor claims. Management anticipates that the Partnership will file a consensual Chapter 11 plan, jointly with these creditor constituents, that will further this divestiture process. It appears highly unlikely that the claims of the holders of the ~~following~~acquisition (facility bank debt and senior notes will be satisfied in ~~thousands):~~full. Accordingly, the Chapter 11 plan that is currently under negotiation contemplates the extinguishment of the Partnership units with no recovery to holders of units, and any plan that is ultimately confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court will likely extinguish the equity units. Further, it is likely that any plan that is ultimately confirmed will, in conjunction with any pre-confirmation asset dispositions, result in the disposition of all of the Partnership’s operations and associated assets.

	September 30, 2003		December 31, 2002
Lumber	$	3,914	$	5,079
Logs	1,966		2,355
Supplies	3,297		3,455
Total manufacturing inventory	9,177		10,889
Alliance lumber products	14,905		17,388
Trading and distribution products	—		5,108
Total	$	24,082	$	33,385

Note 3: Debtor-in-Possession Credit Facility

~~Note~~On 4:July 1, ~~Debtor~~2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered an interim financing order and on July 17, 2003 the Bankruptcy Court entered a final financing order approving a $40 million debtor-in-~~Possession~~possession credit facility (“DIP Revolver”) with CIT Group/Business Credit ~~Facility~~(“CIT”). The $40 million limit is subject to a borrowing base and is reduced to $20 million should the Partnership dispose of all of its Alliance Lumber Segment. The DIP Revolver is collateralized by accounts receivable, inventory and substantially all personal property. The DIP Revolver bears interest at either (a) the Chase Bank Prime Rate plus 0.5% or (b) LIBOR plus 3%, at the option of the Partnership. Any LIBOR loans are made for fixed one, two or three month terms. The DIP Revolver terminates on January 1, 2005 or upon the effective date of a Bankruptcy Court approved plan of reorganization and contains certain covenants and restrictions. As of March 31, 2004, there was $18.3 million outstanding at an interest rate of 4.5% and approximately $16.5 million remained available on the DIP Revolver (see Note 10). As of March 31, 2004, the Partnership was not in compliance with all of the financial reporting covenants of the DIP Revolver, but CIT did not declare an event of default and the Partnership has subsequently complied with all financial reporting covenants. As of March 31, 2004, the Partnership was in compliance with all of the other covenants of the DIP Revolver.

~~On July~~Note 1,4: Liabilities ~~2003,~~Subject the Bankruptcy Court entered an interim financing order and on July 17, 2003 the Bankruptcy Court entered a final financing order approving the $40 million DIP Revolver (see also Notes 1 and 2). On July 3, 2003, the Partnership borrowed $19.8 million on the DIP Revolver in order to ~~pay in full the balance outstanding on its pre-existing revolving credit facility and all related accrued interest and fees. The pre-existing revolving credit facility was then terminated.~~Compromise

~~The~~Pursuant ~~$40~~to ~~million~~the ~~limit~~bankruptcy isproceedings, the Partnership has ~~subject~~classified certain liabilities which existed prior to athe ~~borrowing~~June 29, ~~base~~2003 bankruptcy ~~and~~petition isfiling ~~reduced~~as toliabilities ~~$20~~subject ~~million~~to ~~should~~compromise ~~the~~in accordance ~~Partnership~~with ~~dispose~~SOP 90-7. Disposition and settlement of ~~its~~such ~~Alliance~~liabilities ~~Lumber~~is ~~segment~~under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. The ~~DIP~~following ~~Revolver~~table issummarizes the ~~collateralized~~pre-petition byliabilities ~~accounts~~that ~~receivable,~~are included as liabilities subject to ~~inventory~~compromise on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

	March 31, 2004			December 31, 2003
Acquisition facility principal	$	112,372		$	112,372
Senior notes principal	400,658			400,658
Adequate protection payments(1)	(4,500		)	(3,000		)
Accrued interest	21,039			21,039
Deferred enhanced interest	4,927			4,927
Make whole fees and interest	6,360			6,360
Accounts payable	1,294			1,419
Other accrued expenses	3,490			3,428
Total	$	545,640		$	547,203

(1) In October 2003, the Partnership agreed to pay $0.5 million per month, retroactive to July 2003, to the acquisition facility banks and senior note holders as adequate protection payments related to their asserted collateral. Such payments are to be applied to reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the aggregate allowed secured claims of the senior note holders and the acquisition facility banks. The method for allocating the adequate protection payments will be determined by the Bankruptcy Court and, therefore, the Partnership is not able to apply these payments to specific debt components at this time.

Note 5: Inventories

All inventories, consisting primarily of logs, lumber and building materials, are stated at the lower of average cost or market and consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31, 2004		December 31, 2003
Lumber	$	4,505	$	3,554
Logs	2,434		1,887
Supplies	3,342		3,326
Manufacturing inventory	10,281		8,767
Wholesale products	12,812		19,176
Total	$	23,093	$	27,943

Note 6: Timber, Timberlands and Roads, Net

The Partnership updates its timber inventory system annually for changes in estimated volume due to timber verification cruises, timber growth factors and actual harvest levels by species. The changes to estimated timber volume, along with changes in book value from capitalized expenditures, impairment adjustments and any timber purchase or sale transactions, result in a change in estimated depletion rates. The revised estimate made at the beginning of 2004 decreased depletion expense for the first quarter of 2004 by $0.2 million, compared to the depletion rates that were in effect at the start of 2003 applied to the actual volume harvested in the first quarter of 2004.

Note 7: Allocation of Partnership Losses

The Partnership Agreement provides that profit and losses are generally allocated 1.01% to the General Partner interest and 98.99% to the Limited Partner interest. In addition, the Partnership Agreement specifies that net losses are not allocated to limited partners to the extent doing so would result in (or increase) a deficit balance in their capital accounts. At that point, net losses are allocated 100% to the General Partners. In the third quarter of 2003, the Limited Partners’ capital accounts were reduced to zero, and subsequent income and losses have been allocated 100% to the General Partners. Accordingly, the General Partner interest was allocated the entire net income that was reported in the first quarter of 2004. 100% of income and losses will continue to be allocated to the General Partners unless and until the cumulative additional losses they have been allocated are fully recovered.

Note 8: Unit-Based Compensation

The Partnership accounts for unit options using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure,” the Partnership has computed, for pro forma disclosure purposes, the impact on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per unit as if it had accounted for its unit-based compensation plans in accordance with the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as follows (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

Three Months Ended March 31,	2004			2003
Net income (loss), as reported	$	5,325		$	(16,515	)
Fair value of unit-based employee compensation	(1		)	(8		)
Net income (loss), pro forma	$	5,324		$	(16,523	)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per limited partner unit:
As reported	$	—		$	(0.54	)
Pro forma	$	—		$	(0.54	)

There were no unit options granted in the first quarter of 2004 or 2003.

~~and~~Note ~~any~~9: ~~personal property~~Segment that was not subject to a pre-existing lien. The DIP Revolver bears interest at either (a) the Chase Bank Prime Rate plus 0.5% or (b) LIBOR plus 3%, at the option of the Partnership. Any LIBOR loans are made for fixed one, two or three month terms. The DIP Revolver terminates on January 1, 2005 or upon the effective date of a Bankruptcy Court approved plan of reorganization and contains certain covenants and restrictions. As of September 30, 2003, the Partnership was in compliance with the covenants, there was $20.5 million outstanding at an interest rate of 4.5% and approximately $18.1 million remained available on the DIP Revolver.Reporting

~~Note~~The 5Partnership classifies its business into three fundamental areas for purposes of providing segment information: ~~Liabilities~~1) ~~Subject~~Timberlands, consisting of the operation of tree farms and the harvest and sale of logs to ~~Compromise~~the Partnership’s manufacturing facilities and to third parties, and the sale of timber and timberlands to third parties; 2) Manufacturing, consisting of the manufacture of logs into dimension lumber and the sale of such lumber as well as residual chips and other by-products; and 3) Alliance Lumber, consisting of the distribution and supply of building materials through the Partnership’s professional contractor service yards. Corporate and Other includes general corporate overhead and expenses not allocated to the segments, miscellaneous operations not significant enough to be classified as a separate segment and other items not specifically allocated to the operating segments.

AsThe ~~discussed~~Partnership discontinued ~~above,~~its onTrading ~~June 29, 2003, the Partnership~~ and ~~its~~Distribution ~~subsidiaries~~Segment ~~filed~~during ~~for~~the ~~chapter~~second 11quarter ~~bankruptcy~~of ~~protection. Pursuant~~2003, toand the ~~bankruptcy proceedings,~~results ~~the~~from ~~Partnership~~this ~~has~~segment ~~classified~~are ~~certain~~shown ~~liabilities~~as ~~which~~discontinued ~~existed~~operations ~~prior~~for toall ~~the~~periods ~~June~~presented. ~~29,~~The ~~2003~~Trading ~~bankruptcy~~and ~~petition~~Distribution ~~filing~~Segment asconsisted ~~liabilities subject to~~of ~~compromise~~the inwholesale ~~accordance~~trading, ~~with~~marketing ~~SOP~~and ~~90-7. Disposition~~distribution of ~~such~~lumber ~~liabilities~~and ispanel ~~under the jurisdiction of the~~products. ~~Bankruptcy~~See ~~Court~~Note 10.

~~The~~On ~~following~~March 24, ~~table~~2004 the ~~summarizes~~Bankruptcy Court approved a motion to sell the net assets of the Las Vegas ~~pre-petition~~operations ~~liabilities~~of ~~that~~the ~~are~~Partnership’s ~~included~~Alliance asLumber ~~liabilities~~Segment, ~~subject~~and, toaccordingly, ~~compromise~~the onresults from the ~~accompanying~~Las ~~consolidated~~Vegas ~~balance~~business ~~sheet~~unit ~~(in~~are ~~thousands):~~shown as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 10.

	September 30, 2003
Acquisition facility principal	$	112,372
Senior notes principal	400,658
Accounts payable	1,377
Accrued interest	21,039
Deferred enhanced interest	4,927
Make whole fees and interest	6,360
Other accrued expenses	818
Total	$	547,551

The Partnership does not show assets by segment, as historic costs are not used by management to allocate resources or assess performance.

~~See~~The ~~Note~~following summarizes 2the ~~also.~~Partnership’s segment information (in thousands):

Note 6: Partners’ Capital and Income (Loss) Per Unit

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Revenues	2004			2003
Timberlands:
Trade	$	5,529		$	6,917
Intersegment	8,890			9,544
	14,419			16,461
Manufacturing:
Trade	26,121			21,976
Intersegment	852			1,173
	26,973			23,149
Alliance Lumber:
Trade	48,620			34,781
Intersegment	—			—
	48,620			34,781
Corporate and Other:
Trade	2,277			2,439
Intersegment	—			60
	2,277			2,499
Total:
Total Revenue	92,289			76,890
Less Intersegment	(9,742		)	(10,777		)
Net Revenue	$	82,547		$	66,113

The partnership agreement for the Partnership provides that profit and losses are generally allocated 1% to the General Partner interest and 99% to the Limited Partner interest. In addition, the partnership agreement specifies that net losses are not allocated to limited partners to the extent doing so would result in (or increase) a deficit balance in their capital accounts. At that point, net losses are allocated 100% to the General Partners. In the third quarter of 2003, the Limited Partners’ capital accounts were reduced to zero, and subsequent losses have been allocated 100% to the General Partners. Accordingly, the General Partner interest was allocated an additional $3.5 million of losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.

Net loss per unit was calculated using the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding divided into net loss, after adjusting for the General Partner allocation. There is no difference between basic and diluted earnings per unit.

Note 7: Loss on Timber Purchase Commitments

During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003, the Partnership recognized non-cash losses on purchase commitments with the U.S. Forest Service and private timber deeds of $5.7 million and $6.1 million, respectively, which represent the estimated probable losses to be recognized on these contracts through the completion date, or the estimated harvest dates, for these contracts. The Partnership entered into these contracts several years ago to ensure an adequate log supply for its Gilchrist and Prineville sawmills. Market pricing for the lumber output from these commitments has declined significantly since the commitments were made. Non-cash losses recognized on timber purchase commitments totaled $3.8 million for both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002.

Note 8: Property Sales

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Operating income (loss)	2004			2003
Timberlands	$	408		$	779
Manufacturing	6,962			(576		)
Alliance Lumber	2,369			2,368
Corporate and Other	(2,089		)	(1,827		)
Operating Income	7,650			744
Interest Expense (excluding contractual interest expense of $12,736 and $0)	(268		)	(11,952		)
Other	(414		)	(294		)
Reorganization Items	(2,123		)	—
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$	4,845		$	(11,502	)

On March 29, 2002, the Partnership closed the sale of its Inland South tree farm to Patriot Investments, LLC for $132.4 million. The Partnership recognized a gain on this sale of $6.0 million. On April 30, 2002, the Partnership closed the sale of its Inland North tree farm to Patriot Investments, LLC for $53.9 million. The Partnership recognized a gain on this sale of $1.4 million. Net proceeds from these two property sales were used to reduce outstanding debt.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	2004		2003
Timberlands	$	3,172	$	4,146
Manufacturing	1,212		1,218
Alliance Lumber	75		144
Corporate and Other	561		583
Total	$	5,020	$	6,091

Note 910: Discontinued ~~Debt Restructuring Negotiation Costs and Reorganization Items~~Operations

~~In conjunction~~Las ~~with~~Vegas ~~unsuccessful~~Operations negotiations to restructure the Partnership’s debt and activities conducted prior to the Partnership’s bankruptcy petition filed on June 29, 2003, the Partnership expensed $4.9 million in professional fees during the second quarter of ~~2003. In~~Alliance ~~addition,~~Lumber on June 30, 2003, the Partnership wrote-off $218,000 of deferred debt issuance costs related to its revolving credit facility, which was terminated as a result of the chapter 11 filing (see Note 4). This write-off has been classified separately on the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with SOP 90-7. In the third quarter of 2003, the Partnership continued to incur professional and other fees related to its reorganization activities, totaling approximately $2.0 million.Segment

~~Note~~On ~~10:~~March 24, ~~Debt~~2004, the ~~Restructuring~~Bankruptcy ~~and~~Court approved a motion to dispose of the Partnership’s Alliance ~~Redemption~~Lumber ~~Premium~~Segment operations in Las Vegas, Nevada. In April 2004, the Partnership closed the sale of this operation, resulting in a recognized loss of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2004. Results of operations for the Las Vegas operations are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS No. 144”) “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Summarized financial information for these operations is as follows (in thousands):

In April 2002, the Partnership reached a global debt restructuring agreement with its banks and note holders and incurred a charge of $14.1 million of which $10.0 million was non-cash in nature. The Partnership incurred a total of $8.7 million in fees and costs in connection with the April 2002 debt restructuring, $4.2 million of which was included in the $14.1 million loss recognized in the second quarter of 2002 in accordance with the provisions outlined in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-19 “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments” (“EITF 96-19”). In addition, the Partnership expensed $5.5 million of previously deferred fees and expenses and a $4.5 million redemption premium. The redemption premium was incurred when the Partnership prepaid a portion of its senior notes in advance of their scheduled maturity. Payment of the redemption premium, according to the terms of the senior note restructuring, is deferred until December 31, 2005. The redemption premium is included in liabilities subject to compromise on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2003.

Three Months Ended March 31,	2004		2003
Revenues	$	18,756	$	13,040
Operating income	480		338

~~Note~~As ~~11:~~of ~~Discontinued~~March 31, ~~Operations~~2004, -the assets and liabilities of the Las ~~Disposition~~Vegas operations were classified as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet. Components of ~~Trading~~these assets and liabilities ~~Distribution~~were ~~Segment~~as follows (in thousands):

In April and May 2003, in two separate transactions, the Partnership sold the inventory and fixed assets related to its Trading and Distribution segment and discontinued the segment’s operations. The purchasers of these assets assumed the operating leases, accounts payable and accrued expenses related to these businesses. The Partnership received a total of $4.5 million from these asset sales, all of which was immediately applied to outstanding principal on the pre-existing revolving credit facility. These assets were sold at approximately their book value, resulting in a $4,000 gain in the second quarter of 2003. The Partnership retained its accounts receivable related to these operations, which totaled $5.8 million as of the disposition dates. All these accounts receivable were either collected or fully reserved as of September 30, 2003. The results of operations of the Trading and Distribution segment are reflected as discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 144. Revenues from this segment were zero and $34.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Revenues from this segment were $34.1 million and $132.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

	March 31, 2004
Accounts receivable, net	$	9,653
Inventory	3,933
Other assets	700
Assets held for sale	$	14,286

Liabilities held for sale	$	(838	)

~~During March~~Sale ~~2003, deterioration~~ of the ~~Partnership’s~~net ~~trade~~assets ~~credit~~of ~~availability~~the ~~began to~~Las ~~adversely~~Vegas ~~affect~~operations ~~operating~~produced ~~margins in the Trading and Distribution~~cash ~~segment. Pursuant~~proceeds ~~to the provisions~~ of ~~SFAS~~ No$12.3 ~~142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets~~million,” ~~the~~all ~~Partnership evaluated the goodwill balance~~ of ~~this~~which ~~segment~~was ~~for~~immediately ~~impairment~~paid ~~following~~to ~~the~~CIT ~~change~~to inreduce ~~circumstances~~outstanding ~~during~~borrowings under the ~~first~~DIP ~~quarter~~Revolver. This ofdisposition ~~2003,~~is ~~utilizing~~expected ato ~~fair~~reduce ~~value~~availability ~~analysis of~~under the ~~business~~DIP Revolver inby ~~the~~$4.0 ~~current~~to ~~market environment~~$5. ~~Based~~0 ~~on the results of this evaluation, the Partnership~~million.

~~determined that~~Trading ~~its goodwill was impaired~~ and ~~recorded~~Distribution ~~a non-cash impairment charge of $5.5 million in the first quarter of 2003. This $5.5 million charge is included in discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.~~Segment

~~Note~~In ~~12:~~April and ~~Unit-Based~~May 2003, ~~Compensation~~in two separate transactions, the Partnership sold the inventory and fixed assets related to its Trading and Distribution Segment and discontinued the segment’s operations. The purchasers of these assets assumed the operating leases, accounts payable and accrued expenses related to these businesses. The Partnership received a total of $4.5 million from these asset sales, all of which was immediately applied to outstanding principal on the revolving credit facility. The results of operations of the Trading and Distribution Segment are reflected as discontinued operations on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 144.

~~The~~During ~~Partnership~~March 2003, ~~accounts for~~deterioration ~~unit~~of ~~options using~~ the Partnership’s ~~intrinsic~~trade ~~value~~credit ~~method~~availability asbegan ~~prescribed~~to byadversely ~~Accounting~~affect operating ~~Principles~~margins ~~Board~~in ~~(APB)~~the ~~Opinion~~Trading ~~No.~~and ~~25,~~Distribution ~~“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees~~Segment.” Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. ~~148~~ 142 “~~Accounting~~Goodwill ~~for~~and ~~Stock-Based~~Other Intangible ~~Compensation~~Assets,” -the ~~Transition~~Partnership ~~and~~evaluated ~~Disclosure,”~~the ~~which~~goodwill balance of this ~~the~~segment ~~Partnership~~for ~~adopted~~impairment following the change in ~~December~~circumstances ~~2002,~~during the ~~Partnership~~first quarter ~~has~~of ~~computed~~2003, ~~for~~utilizing ~~pro forma~~a ~~disclosure~~fair ~~purposes,~~value analysis of the ~~impact~~business onin ~~net~~the ~~loss~~current market ~~and~~environment. Based ~~net~~on ~~loss~~the results ~~per~~of ~~unit~~this asevaluation, ~~if it~~the ~~had~~Partnership ~~accounted~~determined ~~for~~that its goodwill ~~unit-based~~was ~~compensation~~impaired ~~plans~~and inrecorded ~~accordance~~a ~~with~~non-cash ~~the fair~~impairment ~~value~~charge ~~method~~of ~~prescribed~~$5.5 bymillion in ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~three ~~123~~months ~~“Accounting~~ended ~~for~~March 31, ~~Stock-Based~~2003. ~~Compensation”~~This as$5.5 ~~follows~~million ~~(in~~charge ~~thousands,~~is ~~except~~included ~~per~~in ~~unit~~discontinued ~~amounts):~~operations.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Net loss, as reported	$	(6,652	)	$	(16,744	)	$	(44,070	)	$	(46,855	)
Deduct - unit-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards	(8		)	(22		)	(24		)	(66		)
Net loss, pro forma	$	(6,660	)	$	(16,766	)	$	(44,094	)	$	(46,921	)
Basic and diluted net loss per unit:
As reported	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(1.28	)	$	(1.52	)
Pro forma	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.54	)	$	(1.28	)	$	(1.52	)

Summarized financial information for these operations is as follows (in thousands):

There were no unit options granted in the first nine months of 2003 or 2002.

Three Months Ended March 31,	2003
External revenues	$	27,807
Operating loss	(5,351		)

~~Note~~Reno, ~~13:~~Nevada ~~Segment~~Operations ~~Reporting~~of Alliance Lumber Segment

~~Prior~~The ~~to January 1, 2003, the~~ Partnership ~~reported~~is ~~the activities of the Trading and Distribution~~in ~~segment~~negotiations ~~and~~to ~~the~~sell its Alliance Lumber ~~segment~~Segment onoperations ain ~~combined~~Reno, ~~basis~~Nevada ~~as a single~~and ~~Wholesale~~anticipates ~~Marketing~~signing ~~segment. These businesses~~an ~~were~~asset ~~separated~~purchase ~~into~~agreement ~~two reporting segments at the beginning of 2003 to reflect that the Partnership began managing these segments as separate businesses. The 2002 periods have been conformed~~ in the ~~following~~second ~~tables~~quarter ~~to the~~of ~~current year presentation for segments~~2004. ~~The~~ If ~~Partnership~~an ~~classifies~~asset ~~its~~purchase ~~business~~agreement ~~into three fundamental areas for~~is ~~purposes~~signed ofand ~~providing~~approved ~~segment~~by ~~information:~~the 1)Bankruptcy ~~Timberlands~~Court, ~~consisting of~~ the ~~operation~~ ofdisposition ~~tree farms and the harvest and sale~~ of ~~logs to~~ the ~~Partnership’s~~Reno, ~~manufacturing~~Nevada ~~facilities~~operations ~~and~~is expected to ~~third~~generate ~~parties,~~approximately ~~and~~$11.0 ~~the sale of timber and timberlands~~ to ~~third~~$12.5 ~~parties; 2) Manufacturing, consisting of the manufacture~~million of ~~logs into dimension lumber and the sale of residual chips and other by-products to pulp and paper mills; and 3) Alliance Lumber~~cash, ~~consisting~~all of ~~the distribution~~which ~~and~~will ~~supply~~be ofimmediately ~~building~~paid ~~products~~to ~~through~~CIT ~~the~~to ~~Partnership’s professional~~reduce ~~contractor service yards.~~ outstanding Asborrowings ~~discussed~~under ~~in Note 11 above,~~ the ~~Partnership~~DIP ~~disposed of its Trading and Distribution segment during the second quarter of 2003~~Revolver. ~~The Trading and Distribution segment~~In ~~consisted of the wholesale trading~~addition, ~~marketing and distribution of lumber and panel products. Corporate and Other includes general corporate overhead and expenses not allocated to~~ the ~~segments,~~disposition ~~miscellaneous~~is ~~operations~~expected ~~not significant enough~~ to bereduce ~~classified as a separate segment and~~ the ~~gain~~borrowing ~~related to~~base ~~the~~on ~~sale of~~ the ~~Inland Tree Farm in 2002. The~~ Partnership’s ~~does~~DIP ~~not~~Revolver ~~show assets~~ by ~~segment,~~approximately as$8.5 ~~historic costs are not used by management~~ to ~~allocate resources~~$9.5 ~~or assess performance~~million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization

During the second quarter of 2003, we were unable to meet the financial covenants and scheduled interest payments pursuant to our bank loan and senior note agreements. In addition, we were unable to successfully negotiate a recapitalization with our bank lenders and senior note holders. Accordingly, on June 29, 2003, we filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix, Arizona (the “Bankruptcy Court”) for the Partnership and all but one of our subsidiaries, Klamath Northern Railway, Co. We currently manage our properties and operate our businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

We have experienced net losses in thirteen of the last fourteen fiscal quarters, and would have reported a net loss in the current quarter if $12.7 million of contractual interest expense had been recognized. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern, and in accordance with SOP 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code.” As a result of our Chapter 11 filing, there is no assurance that the carrying amounts of our assets will be realized or that the liabilities will be settled for the amounts recorded. Until a plan of reorganization is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, we are not able to determine the ultimate disposition of our assets and liabilities.

The following ~~summarizes~~occurred under the ~~Partnership’s~~jurisdiction of ~~segment~~the ~~information~~Bankruptcy (Court in ~~thousands)~~the first quarter of 2004:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Revenues	2003			2002			2003			2002
Timberlands:
Trade	$	5,725		$	8,226		$	16,942		$	28,055
Intersegment	7,850			10,934			23,651			31,114
	13,575			19,160			40,593			59,169
Manufacturing:
Trade	23,462			26,332			62,049			77,392
Intersegment	755			1,026			2,827			3,224
	24,217			27,358			64,876			80,616
Alliance Lumber:
Trade	57,811			49,237			156,344			132,503
Intersegment	—			—			—			—
	57,811			49,237			156,344			132,503
Corporate and Other:
Trade	2,255			2,466			6,529			7,369
Intersegment	—			114			76			309
	2,255			2,580			6,605			7,678
Total:
Total Revenue	97,858			98,335			268,418			279,966
Less Intersegment	(8,605		)	(12,074		)	(26,554		)	(34,647		)
Net Revenue	$	89,253		$	86,261		$	241,864		$	245,319

• Negotiations on a consensual plan of re-organization with representatives of the senior note holders and acquisition facility banks continued.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Operating income (loss)	2003			2002			2003			2002
Timberlands	$	392		$	1,188		$	1,445		$	4,071
Manufacturing	(2,599		)	(4,870		)	(3,781		)	(2,194		)
Alliance Lumber	149			2,641			4,898			6,677
Corporate and Other	(1,966		)	(3,066		)	(12,982		)	(968		)
Operating Income (Loss)	(4,024		)	(4,107		)	(10,420		)	7,586
Interest Expense	(254		)	(12,482		)	(24,274		)	(39,703		)
Debt restructuring and redemption premium	—			—			—			(14,133		)
Other	(357		)	(521		)	(1,315		)	(1,756		)
Reorganization expenses	(1,984		)	—			(2,202		)	—
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(6,619	)	$	(17,110	)	$	(38,211	)	$	(48,006	)

• A marketing process was initiated regarding the Partnership’s Manufacturing Segment and Alliance Lumber Segment assets.

~~Note~~• On March 24, ~~14:~~2004, ~~New~~the ~~Accounting~~Bankruptcy ~~Pronouncements~~Court approved a motion to dispose of our Alliance Lumber Segment operations in Las Vegas, Nevada. See Discontinued Operations below.

InThe ~~August~~creditors ~~2001,~~on the ~~FASB~~acquisition ~~issued~~facility ~~SFAS~~and ~~No.~~senior notes assert ~~143,~~that ~~“Accounting~~their ~~for~~debt ~~Obligations~~is ~~Associated~~collateralized ~~with~~by ~~the~~our ~~Retirement~~timberlands ofand ~~Long-Lived~~certain real property ~~Assets~~and equipment associated with our Manufacturing Segment.~~” SFAS~~ NoThe remaining liabilities subject to compromise are generally unsecured. ~~143~~The ~~establishes~~Chapter 11 filing ~~accounting~~constitutes ~~standards~~a ~~for~~default ~~the~~or ~~recognition~~event ~~and~~of ~~measurement~~default under a number of ~~asset~~our ~~retirement~~debt, lease and ~~obligations~~other contractual relationships. While we are under bankruptcy protection, any scheduled interest or principal payments are deferred and ~~the~~creditors ~~associated~~are generally ~~asset~~prohibited ~~retirement~~from ~~costs. The~~pursuing ~~Partnership~~collection ~~adopted~~of their pre-petition claims by the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In accordance with SOP ~~SFAS~~90-7, Nowe stopped accruing interest on our term debt effective June 30, 2003, because it is not probable it will be paid during the bankruptcy proceedings or be an allowed claim. ~~143~~An additional $12.7 million and $25.3 million, respectively, of interest expense would have been recognized in the first quarter of ~~2003~~2004 ~~with~~and noin ~~material~~the ~~effect~~second onhalf ~~its financial~~of ~~position,~~2003 ~~results~~if ofnot ~~operations~~for orthe ~~cash~~Chapter ~~flows~~11 bankruptcy petition.

InOn November 10, ~~July 2002~~2003, ~~the~~a ~~FASB~~hearing ~~issued~~was ~~SFAS~~held ~~No. 146,~~in ~~“Accounting~~the ~~for~~Bankruptcy ~~Costs~~Court ~~Associated~~on ~~with~~a ~~Exit~~motion from orus, ~~Disposal~~which ~~Activities.” SFAS~~was ~~No.~~opposed ~~146~~by ~~addresses~~the creditors, to extend the ~~financial~~period of ~~accounting~~exclusivity ~~and~~in ~~reporting~~which ~~for~~only ~~obligations~~we ~~associated~~could ~~with~~present ana ~~exit~~plan ~~activity,~~of ~~including~~reorganization to the ~~restructuring~~Bankruptcy Court. ~~Exit~~At ~~activities~~the ~~include~~hearing, the ~~but~~Bankruptcy ~~are~~Court ~~not~~denied ~~limited~~our tomotion, ~~eliminating~~thereby orending ~~reducing~~the ~~product~~period ~~lines,~~within ~~terminating~~which we ~~employees~~had ~~and~~the ~~contracts~~exclusive ~~and~~right ~~relocating~~to ~~plant~~propose ~~facilities~~a orreorganization ~~personnel~~plan. ~~SFAS~~We ~~No.~~are ~~146~~negotiating ~~specifies~~with ~~that~~the amajor ~~company~~creditor ~~will~~constituents in ~~record~~our aChapter ~~liability~~11 ~~for~~proceedings, and have begun to pursue a ~~cost~~process ~~associated~~by ~~with~~which anour assets ~~exit~~and operations will be sold or ~~disposal~~otherwise ~~activity~~divested ~~only~~in order to satisfy ~~when~~creditor ~~that~~claims. ~~liability~~We isanticipate ~~incurred~~that ~~and~~we ~~can~~will befile ~~measured~~a atconsensual ~~fair~~Chapter ~~value. Therefore~~11 plan, jointly ~~commitment~~with tothese ancreditor ~~exit~~constituents, ~~plan~~that orwill afurther this divestiture ~~plan~~process. It appears highly unlikely that the claims of ~~disposal~~the ~~expresses~~holders ~~only~~of ~~management’s~~our acquisition ~~intended~~facility ~~future~~bank ~~actions~~debt and, senior notes will be satisfied in full. ~~therefore~~Accordingly, ~~does~~the ~~not~~Chapter ~~meet~~11 plan that is currently under negotiation contemplates the ~~requirement~~extinguishment ~~for~~of ~~recognizing~~our apartnership ~~liability~~units with no recovery to holders of units, and any plan that is ultimately confirmed by the Bankruptcy ~~related~~Court ~~expense. SFAS~~will Nolikely extinguish the equity units. ~~146~~Further, it is likely that any ~~effective~~plan ~~prospectively~~that ~~for~~is ~~exit~~ultimately orconfirmed ~~disposal~~will, ~~activities~~in ~~initiated~~conjunction ~~after~~with any ~~December~~pre-confirmation ~~31,~~asset ~~2002~~dispositions, ~~with~~result ~~earlier~~in ~~adoption~~the ~~encouraged. The~~disposition ~~adoption~~of substantially all of ~~SFAS~~our ~~No.~~operations ~~146~~and associated assets.

Industry Overview

The forest products and building materials industries are characterized by highly volatile commodity pricing. Product pricing for logs, dimension lumber and other building materials is a function of species, grade, size and availability. Prices are heavily influenced by supply and demand for products. Prices tend to follow broad seasonal and cyclical patterns. Demand is influenced by activity levels in the housing and construction industries, as well as general economic conditions and foreign currency exchange rates. In recent years, over capacity of lumber manufacturing facilities has led to an abundance of supply. Supply has been further increased by imported products from Canada and other countries. In addition, competition from non-wood based products and composite materials has also influenced prices for dimension lumber. Although demand has been strong over the last three years, excess supply has contributed to low prices for lumber, which, in turn, has depressed prices for logs and timberlands. Beginning in the second half of 2003, prices for lumber and paneling increased sharply, and have remained relatively strong through the first quarter of 2004. Prices for logs have remained relatively low, but have increased modestly in late 2003 and early 2004. A major trade dispute with Canada over the importation of lumber and paneling has continued to cast uncertainty over the markets for these products. Weather and forest fire activity, as well as environmental issues concerning the harvesting of timber, are also contributing factors to supply and the volatility of prices in our industry.

in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 did not have any effect on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (FIN 45), which elaborates on required disclosures by a guarantor in its financial statements about obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued and clarifies the need for a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of certain guarantees, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Partnership has reviewed the provisions of FIN 45 relating to initial recognition and measurement of guarantor liabilities, which are effective for qualifying guarantees entered into or modified after December 31, 2002. FIN 45 did not have an effect on the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities (VIE’s) created after January 31, 2003, and to VIE’s in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003, to VIE’s in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. The Partnership has not yet determined the effect that adoption of FIN 46 may have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows, given the recent chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 is effective for the Partnership prospectively for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The Partnership does not have any derivative instruments, nor is it involved in any hedging activities and, therefore, the adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have any impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for the Partnership for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for paragraphs 9, 10 and 22 of the standard, which have been deferred indefinitely. The Partnership has not yet determined the effect that adoption of SFAS No. 150 may have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 15: Subsequent Events

In October 2003, the Partnership agreed to pay $0.5 million per month, beginning with the month of July 2003, to the acquisition facility banks and senior note holders as adequate protection payments related to their asserted collateral. Such payments are to be applied to reduce on a dollar-for-dollar basis the aggregate allowed secured claims of the senior note holders and the acquisition facility banks. On November 7, 2003, the Partnership made a lump sum adequate protection payment of $2.5 million covering the period of July through November 2003.

On November 10, 2003, a hearing was held in the Bankruptcy Court on a motion from the Partnership, which was opposed by the creditors, to extend the period of exclusivity in which only the Partnership may present a plan of reorganization to the Bankruptcy Court. At the hearing, the Bankruptcy Court denied the Partnership’s

motion, thereby ending the period within which the Partnership had the exclusive right to propose a reorganization plan.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition Filing

During the second quarter of 2003, we were unable to meet the financial covenants and scheduled interest payments pursuant to our bank loan and senior note agreements. In addition, we were unable to successfully negotiate a recapitalization with our bank lenders and senior note holders. Accordingly, on June 29, 2003, we filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix, Arizona (the “Bankruptcy Court”) for the Partnership and all but one of our subsidiaries. We currently manage our properties and operate our businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. We have experienced net losses in each of the last twelve fiscal quarters, and, as mentioned above, we are under chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” long-lived assets to be held and used are accounted for at their historical cost, unless they are determined to be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized “only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows…” Our property, plant and equipment and timber, timberlands and roads are all considered to be long-lived assets to be held and used within the meaning of SFAS No. 144. Accordingly, such assets are carried at their historical cost, because the carrying amount of such assets does not exceed the estimated undiscounted cash flows from such assets. Given the uncertainties of the chapter 11 process, there can be no assurances that we, despite our best efforts, will continue to operate these long-lived assets and classify them as held and used and that the carrying amounts of these assets will be fully realized.

As part of our bankruptcy proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court approved a debtor-in-possession financing agreement (“DIP Revolver”) in the amount of $40 million that we arranged with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. During the reorganization process, vendors who deliver goods and provide services to us receive priority payment protection under the bankruptcy law for such obligations. Obligations that arose prior to June 29, 2003 are included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise.

See also “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

In addition to the approval of the DIP Revolver discussed above, during the third quarter of 2003, the following occurred under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court:

• An unsecured creditors committee was formed.

• Certain of the acquisition facility creditors filed a motion for lift of the automatic stay and to proceed with the foreclosure process on collateral. A hearing date is set for December 2, 2003 on this issue.

On November 10, 2003, a hearing was held in the Bankruptcy Court on a motion from us, which was opposed by the creditors, to extend the period of exclusivity in which only we may present a plan of reorganization to the Bankruptcy Court. At the hearing, the Bankruptcy Court denied our motion, thereby ending the period within which we had the exclusive right to propose a reorganization plan.

Although we have filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, we continue to actively pursue a recapitalization plan. Any recapitalization plan will be subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court and may involve the disposition of certain Partnership assets. The creditors on the acquisition facility and senior notes assert that their debt is secured by our timberlands and certain real property and equipment associated with our manufacturing segment. The remaining liabilities subject to compromise are generally unsecured. While we are under bankruptcy protection, any scheduled interest or principal payments are deferred and creditors are generally prohibited from pursuing collection of their pre-petition claims by the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In accordance with SOP 90-7, we discontinued accruing interest on our term debt effective June 30, 2003, because it is not probable it will be paid during the bankruptcy proceedings or be an allowed claim. An additional $11.7 million of interest expense would have been recognized to date if not for the chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.

Forward-Looking Statements

Information contained in Item 2 and other sections of this report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding our expectations, forecasts, hopes, beliefs, predictions, intentions or strategies regarding the future that are not purely historical, but are based on assumptions that in the future may prove not to be accurate. These assumptions include harvest volumes, species mix, prices for logs and lumber, demand for housing and levels and amounts received for stumpage and property sales. Our business and prospects are subject to a number of risks, including the volatility of timber and lumber prices, factors limiting harvesting of timber including contractual obligations, governmental restrictions, weather and access limitations – as well as the substantial capital resources required to fund our operations and the uncertainty regarding procurement of additional equity capital. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from the expectations expressed in this report.

Additional factors that could affect future performance include our ability to successfully reorganize under bankruptcy protection, environmental risks, operating risks normally associated with the timber industry, competition, government regulations and policies, and economic changes in the regions where our products or substitute products are sold, including Southeast Asia and Japan. Other risk factors include fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, and our ability to implement our business strategy. These and other risks are described in our registration statements and reports filed from time to time on forms 10-K, 8-K, and 10-Q and reports to unitholders, which are available from us or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As discussed above, on June 29, 2003, we filed for ~~chapter~~Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Pursuant to the bankruptcy proceedings, we have listed certain pre-petition liabilities which existed prior to the June 29, 2003 bankruptcy filing as liabilities subject to compromise. Disposition and settlement of such liabilities is under the jurisdiction of the ~~Bankruptcy~~ Bankruptcy Court.

The following table summarizes the pre-petition liabilities that are included as liabilities subject to compromise (in thousands):

	September 30, 2003
	March 31, 2004			December 31, 2003
Acquisition facility principal	$	112,372		$	112,372
Senior notes principal	400,658			400,658
Accounts payable	1,377
Adequate protection payments(1)	(4,500		)	(3,000		)
Accrued interest	21,039			21,039
Deferred enhanced interest	4,927			4,927
Make whole fees and interest	6,360			6,360
Other accrued expenses	818
Accounts payable	1,294			1,419
Total	$	547,551
Other accrued expenses	3,490			3,428
Total	$	545,640		$	547,203

On July 1, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered an interim financing order and on July 17, 2003 the Bankruptcy Court entered a final financing order approving a $40 million debtor-in-possession credit facility (“DIP Revolver”) with CIT Group/Business Credit (“CIT”). The $40 million limit is subject to a borrowing base and is reduced to $20 million should we dispose of all of our Alliance Lumber Segment. The DIP Revolver is collateralized by accounts receivable, inventory and substantially all personal property. The DIP Revolver bears interest at either (a) the Chase Bank Prime Rate plus 0.5% or (b) LIBOR plus 3%, at our option. Any LIBOR loans are made for fixed one, two or

three month terms. The DIP Revolver terminates on January 1, 2005 or upon the effective date of a Bankruptcy Court approved plan of reorganization and contains certain covenants and restrictions. As of March 31, 2004, there was $18.3 million outstanding at an interest rate of 4.5% and approximately $16.5 million remained available on the DIP Revolver. As of March 31, 2004, we were not in compliance with all of the financial reporting covenants of the DIP Revolver, but CIT did not declare an event of default and we have subsequently complied with all financial reporting covenants. As of March 31, 2004, we were in compliance with all of the other covenants of the DIP Revolver.

Working capital increased to $67.0 million at March 31, 2004 compared to $59.4 million at December 31, 2003, primarily due to $4.5 million of cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities resulted from net income of $5.3 million and depletion, depreciation and amortization of $5.0 million, partially off-set by changes in working capital components.

Accounts receivable decreased to $41.3 million at March 31, 2004 compared to $44.0 million at December 31, 2003, primarily due to the reclassification of receivables associated with our Las Vegas, Nevada operations to assets held for sale, net. Excluding this reclassification, accounts receivable would have increased by $7.0 million reflecting increased revenues from higher prices for lumber and paneling.

The $4.9 million decrease in inventories is primarily due to the reclassification of inventory associated with our Las Vegas, Nevada operations to assets held for sale, net. Excluding this reclassification, inventories would have decreased by $0.9 million, reflecting normal timing fluctuations in inventory levels, offset by a $1.8 million increase in prepaid inventories included in prepaid and other current assets.

Assets and liabilities held for sale at March 31, 2004 relate to the net assets sold with our Las Vegas operations in April 2004, and consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31, 2004
Accounts receivable, net	$	9,653
Inventory	3,933
Other assets	700
Assets held for sale	$	14,286

Liabilities held for sale	$	(838	)

Sale of the net assets of our Las Vegas operations produced cash proceeds of $12.3 million, all of which was immediately paid to CIT to reduce outstanding borrowings under the DIP Revolver. This disposition is expected to reduce the borrowing base under the DIP Revolver by $4.0 to $5.0 million. If an asset purchase agreement is signed and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, the disposition of the Reno, Nevada operations is expected to generate approximately $11.0 to $12.5 million of cash, all of which will be immediately paid to CIT to reduce outstanding borrowings under the DIP Revolver. In addition, the disposition is expected to reduce the borrowing base on the Partnership’s DIP Revolver by approximately $8.5 to $9.5 million.

Additions to timberlands of $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2004 resulted from normal costs for road building and maintenance, pre-commercial thinning and reforestation activities.

We indefinitely suspended our cash distributions beginning in the fourth quarter of 2000. Furthermore, we are prohibited from making cash distributions to unitholders during our Chapter 11 reorganization process. Since it is unlikely that our unitholders will receive anything as a result of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, it is unlikely that we will make any future cash distributions on our units.

Results of Operations

During the second quarter of 2003, we sold our Trading and Distribution Segment, which is reflected as discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of operations for the first quarter of 2003. In addition, in March 2004, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of, and in April 2004, we sold, the assets related to our Las Vegas, Nevada Alliance Lumber Segment operations. The results of the Las Vegas operations are reflected as discontinued operations in all periods presented. Please see additional discussion below.

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2004					2003
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Dollars			% of revenue(1)		Dollars			% of revenue(1)
Revenue	$	82,547		100.0	%	$	66,113		100.0	%
Operating costs:
Cost of products sold	69,511			84.2		60,507			91.5
Gain on disposal of assets	(18		)	—		(485		)	(0.7	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	5,404			6.6		5,347			8.1
Operating income	7,650			9.3		744			1.1
Interest expense	268			0.3		11,952			18.1
Amortization of debt issuance costs	468			0.6		423			0.6
Other income, net	(54		)	(0.1	)	(129		)	(0.2	)
Income (loss) from operations before reorganization items	6,968			8.4		(11,502		)	(17.4	)
Reorganization items	(2,123		)	(2.6	)	—			—
Income (loss) before discontinued operations	4,845			5.9		(11,502		)	(17.4	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	480			0.6		(5,013		)	(7.6	)
Net income (loss)	$	5,325		6.5	%	$	(16,515	)	(25.0	)%

(1) Percentages may not add due to rounding.

Revenue

Revenue increased $16.4 million, or 24.9%, to $82.5 million in the first quarter of 2004 compared to $66.1 million in the first quarter of 2003 due primarily to increased revenues from our Manufacturing Segment and our Alliance Lumber Segment, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from our Timberlands Segment, as discussed more fully below.

Cost of Products Sold

Cost of products sold increased $9.0 million, or 14.9%, to 69.5 million in the first quarter of 2004 compared to $60.5 million in the first quarter of 2003 due to increased sales volume. The decrease in cost of products sold as a percentage of revenue in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2003 is primarily due to improved gross margins in our Manufacturing Segment, partially off-set by lower gross margins in our Alliance Lumber Segment, as discussed more fully below.

Gain on Disposal of Assets

Gain on disposal of assets of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2003 represents the gain on sale of aviation equipment.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were relatively flat at $5.4 million in the first quarter of 2004 compared to $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2003. Reductions in personnel costs from reduced headcount were off-set by increased costs for insurance and bad debts expense.

InInterest October 2003, we agreed to pay $0.5 million per month, beginning with the month of July 2003, to the acquisition facility banks and senior note holders as adequate protection payments related to their asserted collateral. Such payments are to be applied to reduce on a dollar-for-dollar basis the aggregate allowed secured claims of the senior note holders and the acquisition facility banks. On November 7, 2003, we made a lump sum adequate protection payment of $2.5 million covering the period of July through November 2003.Expense

~~On July~~In ~~17,~~accordance ~~2003~~with ~~the~~SOP 90-7, ~~Partnership~~interest ~~received~~expense ain ~~final order from~~ the ~~Bankruptcy Court~~first ~~approving~~quarter ~~the implementation~~ of a2004 ~~$40~~does ~~million~~not ~~debtor-in-possession loan~~include ~~facility~~contractual ~~(“DIP~~interest ~~Revolver”)~~totaling ~~with~~$12.7 ~~The~~million ~~CIT~~on ~~Group/Business Credit, Inc. With~~ the ~~DIP~~Senior ~~Revolver~~Notes inand ~~place, we should~~Acquisition ~~have~~Facility ~~adequate~~since ~~liquidity~~it tois ~~pay~~not ~~our~~probable ~~vendors~~it ~~for~~will ~~goods~~be ~~delivered~~paid tosubsequent ~~and services provided~~ to ~~us on a post-petition basis after~~ our June 29, 2003~~. On~~ ~~July~~Chapter 3,11 ~~2003,~~bankruptcy ~~the Partnership borrowed $19~~filing.8 Please ~~million~~read on“Chapter ~~the~~11 ~~DIP~~Bankruptcy ~~Revolver~~Reorganization” inabove ~~order to pay in full the balance outstanding on its pre-existing revolving credit facility and all related accrued interest and fees~~also. ~~The pre-existing revolving credit facility was then terminated.~~

~~The~~Reorganization $40 million DIP Revolver limit is subject to a borrowing base and is reduced to $20 million should we dispose of our Alliance Lumber segment. The DIP Revolver is collateralized by our accounts receivable, inventory and any personal property that was not subject to a pre-existing lien. The DIP Revolver bears interest at either (a) the Chase Bank Prime Rate plus 0.5% or (b) LIBOR plus 3%, at our option. Any LIBOR loans are made for fixed one, two or three month terms. The DIP Revolver terminates on January 1, 2005 or upon the effective date of a Bankruptcy Court approved plan of reorganization and contains certain covenants and restrictions. As of September 30, 2003, we were in compliance with the covenants, there was $20.5 million outstanding at an interest rate of 4.5% and approximately $18.1 million remained available on the DIP Revolver.Items

~~Cash provided by~~Reorganization ~~operating~~items ~~activities~~consist ~~was $377,000 in the first nine months of 2003 and resulted~~ primarily ~~from a net loss~~ of ~~$44.1~~professional ~~million~~fees and ~~an increase in prepaid and~~ other ~~current~~ ~~assets of $7.9 million, being more than offset by non-cash expenses and~~ charges ~~totaling~~incurred ~~$32.0 million, cash provided by the change in accounts and~~related ~~notes~~to ~~receivable~~our ofChapter ~~$0.2~~11 ~~million,~~reorganization ~~cash provided by the change in inventories of $4.8 million~~ and ~~cash~~recapitalization ~~provided~~efforts bysubsequent ~~the change in accounts payable and accrued expenses (including those classified as liabilities subject~~ to ~~compromise) of~~ ~~$15.5 million. Working capital increased to $51.3 million at September 30~~June 29, 2003 ~~compared to $31~~.5 ~~million~~We ~~at December~~anticipate ~~31,~~continuing ~~2002, primarily due~~ to ~~the~~incur ~~chapter~~significant ~~11 bankruptcy petition filing~~professional fees and ~~the~~court ~~classification~~costs ofin ~~liabilities~~future asquarters ~~liabilities~~related ~~subject~~ to ~~compromise, which~~our ~~would~~reorganization ~~otherwise~~efforts under beChapter ~~classified as current liabilities~~11.

~~Accounts~~Income receivable increased to $41.3 million at September 30, 2003 compared to $39.8 million at December 31, 2003. This increase is primarily due to higher revenues from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the fourth quarter of 2002, partially off-set by the disposition of our Trading and Distribution segment earlier in 2003. The $9.3 million decrease in inventories is primarily due to the sale of our Trading and Distribution segment early in the second quarter of 2003. Prepaid and other current assets increased to $11.7 million at September 30, 2003 compared to $4.1 million at December 31, 2002. This increase is primarily due to our trade credit difficulties which have necessitated the pre-payment of inventory purchases from certain vendors.Taxes

~~The~~In ~~increase~~the inpast, ~~accounts~~we ~~payable~~have ~~and~~not ~~accrued~~paid ~~expenses,~~significant ~~including~~income ~~those~~taxes ~~amounts~~and ~~classified~~have asnot ~~liabilities~~included a provision for ~~subject~~income totaxes ~~compromise~~in our financial statements. As a partnership, taxation on our results of operations is ~~primarily~~generally ~~due~~the responsibility of the unitholders. However, we own, directly and indirectly, four corporations that constitute a consolidated group of corporations for federal income tax purposes. This consolidated group of corporations is expected to ~~accrued~~incur ~~interest~~an onincome ~~long-term~~tax ~~debt~~liability in 2004, following the ~~which~~April 2004 ~~was~~disposition ~~due~~of our Las Vegas operations, but we are not ~~paid~~able ~~during~~to estimate the ~~second~~final ~~quarter~~2004 oftax ~~2003,~~liability ~~offset~~for inthe ~~part~~consolidated bygroup of ~~decreases~~corporations ~~due~~at tothis ~~accelerated~~time. ~~credit~~We ~~terms~~may ~~imposed~~incur bymaterial ~~vendors~~income ~~and~~tax ~~the~~liability ~~disposal~~in the future from any further disposition of ~~the~~additional ~~Trading~~assets. Any ~~and~~such ~~Distribution~~income ~~segment~~tax incurred by these taxable entities would generally not be allocated to unitholders.

~~Net~~Allocation ~~cash provided by investing activities~~ of ~~$1.2~~Income million resulted primarily from $7.2 million received from the sale of equipment and the Trading and Distribution segment inventories, partially offset by the use of $4.8 million for additions to timberlands and timber cutting rights (~~primarily for road construction and reforestation~~Losses) ~~and $1.2 million used for additions to equipment.~~

Our partnership agreement provides that profit and losses are generally allocated 1.01% to the General Partner interest and 98.99% to the Limited Partner interest. In addition, the partnership agreement specifies that net losses are not allocated to limited partners to the extent doing so would result in (or increase) a deficit balance in their capital accounts. At that point, net losses are allocated 100% to the General Partners. In the third quarter of 2003, the Limited Partners’ capital accounts were reduced to zero, and subsequent income and losses have been allocated 100% to the General Partners. Accordingly, the General Partner interest was allocated our entire $5.0 million of income in the first quarter of 2004. 100% of income and losses will continue to be allocated to the General Partners unless and until the cumulative additional losses they have been allocated are fully recovered.

Discontinued Operations

Trading and Distribution Segment

Our Trading and Distribution Segment, which was comprised of operations based in Eugene, Oregon and Albuquerque, New Mexico, was sold during the second quarter of 2003. The Trading and Distribution Segment involved the wholesale trading of lumber, panels and other wood products, most of which were not manufactured by us. The results of operations for this segment are reflected as discontinued operations on our consolidated statement of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. This segment produced revenues of $27.8 million and an operating loss of $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2003. The operating loss from this segment in the first quarter of 2003 included a $5.5 million charge for the impairment of goodwill.

Las Vegas, Nevada Alliance Lumber Operations

In March 2004, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of, and in April 2004, we sold, the assets related to our Las Vegas, Nevada Alliance Lumber Segment operations. The results of the Las Vegas operations are reflected as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

The sale of these operations in April 2004, resulted in an additional loss of $1.2 million. Summarized financial information for the Las Vegas operations is as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,	2004		2003
Revenues	$	18,756	$	13,040
Operating income	480		338

~~Net~~Results ~~cash used by financing activities~~ of ~~$5.8~~Operations ~~million resulted from a net $5.5 million decrease in short-term borrowings, which resulted from payments on our pre-existing revolving credit facility, partially offset~~ by ~~borrowings on our DIP revolver.~~Segment

WeExternal ~~do not expect to make~~revenue ~~cash distributions from our current funds or from cash generated~~ by ~~operating activities~~segment ~~until our overall debt levels are substantially reduced~~ and ~~significantly~~ ~~improved~~as ~~market conditions could support~~ a ~~sustained~~percentage ~~quarterly distribution. In~~of ~~addition,~~total ~~cash distributions~~revenue ~~are~~was ~~not~~as ~~allowed~~follows ~~while~~(dollars ~~we are involved~~ in ~~bankruptcy proceedings.~~ thousands):

Results of Operations

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2004				2003
Timberlands	$	5,529	6.7	%	$	6,917	10.5	%
Manufacturing	26,121		31.6	%	21,976		33.2	%
Alliance Lumber	48,620		58.9	%	34,781		52.6	%
Corporate and Other	2,277		2.8	%	2,439		3.7	%
	$	82,547			$	66,113

~~Three~~Operating ~~Months~~income (loss) ~~Ended~~by ~~September~~segment ~~30,~~was ~~2003~~as ~~compared~~follows to(in ~~Three Months Ended September 30, 2002~~thousands):

General

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2004			2003
Timberlands	$	408		$	779
Manufacturing	6,962			(576		)
Alliance Lumber	2,369			2,368
Corporate and Other	(2,089		)	(1,827		)
	$	7,650		$	744

During the second quarter of 2003, we sold our Trading and Distribution segment, which is reflected as discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. Please see additional discussion below.

Revenues from continuing operations during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 increased $3.0 million, or 3.5%, to $89.3 million, from $86.3 million in the same quarter of 2002. The increase reflects strong demand and increasing prices in our Alliance Lumber segment as well as increased average sales realizations from our Manufacturing segment. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales volume in our manufacturing segment and decreased external sales volume and average sales realizations in our Timberlands segment.

Cost of products sold (including charges for losses on timber purchase commitments discussed below) as a percentage of sales increased to 97.8% in the third quarter of 2003, compared to 95.3% in the same quarter of 2002. The increase was primarily due to increased costs at our Alliance Lumber segment as a result of covering pre-existing contracts in an environment of rising market prices and trade credit problems and the relative absence of pricing discounts, as well as the larger loss on timber purchase commitments recognized in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the third quarter of 2002. Increased fuel and other energy costs, and lower production volumes in our Timberlands segments due to fire related harvesting restrictions and problems with retaining loggers following our chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, also contributed to the increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2003, we recognized non-cash losses on timber purchase commitments with the U.S. Forest Service and private timber deeds of $5.7 million, which represents the estimated probable losses to be recognized on these contracts through the completion date, or the estimated harvest dates, for these contracts. We entered into these contracts several years ago to ensure an adequate log supply for our Gilchrist and Prineville sawmills. Market pricing for the lumber output from these commitments has declined significantly since the commitments were made. Non-cash losses recognized on timber purchase commitments totaled $3.8 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2002.

Loss on disposal of assets in the third quarter of 2002 of $1.2 million reflects the write-off of obsolete or retired assets.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $950,000, or 13.6%, to $6.0 million (6.7% of revenue) in the third quarter of 2003, compared to $7.0 million (8.1% of revenue) in the third quarter of 2002. This decrease is primarily a result of decreases in salaries and related personnel costs due to lower headcount and cost reduction initiatives, offset in part by higher insurance premiums.

Interest expense decreased to $254,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to $12.5 million for the comparable period of 2002. In accordance with SOP 90-7, interest expense in the 2003 period only includes interest expense on debt incurred since the date of our chapter 11 bankruptcy filing and, therefore,

does not include $11.7 million of contractual interest on the Senior Notes and Acquisition Facility that would have accrued since that date.

Amortization of debt issuance costs totaled $0.5 million in the third quarters of both 2003 and 2002. At September 30, 2003, we had $3.9 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, which are being amortized through December 31, 2005.

Reorganization items totaling $2.0 million in the third quarter of 2003 consisted primarily of professional fees and other charges incurred related to our reorganization and recapitalization efforts subsequent to June 29, 2003. We anticipate continuing to incur significant professional fees and court costs in future quarters related to our reorganization efforts under chapter 11.

In the past, the Partnership has not paid significant income taxes and has not included a provision for income taxes in its financial statements. The Partnership owns, directly and indirectly, four corporations that constitute a consolidated group of corporations for federal income tax purposes. This consolidated group of corporations may be subject to significant income taxes in the future under certain circumstances, including dispositions of certain assets by the Partnership. Any such income tax incurred by these taxable entities would generally not be allocated to unit holders. We do not anticipate any significant income tax liability from our disposition of the Trading and Distribution segment assets.

Our partnership agreement provides that profit and losses are generally allocated 1% to the General Partner interest and 99% to the Limited Partner interest. In addition, the partnership agreement specifies that net losses are not allocated to limited partners to the extent doing so would result in (or increase) a deficit balance in their capital accounts. At that point, net losses are allocated 100% to the General Partners. In the third quarter of 2003, the Limited Partners’ capital accounts were reduced to zero, and subsequent losses have been allocated 100% to the General Partners.

Timberlands

~~Total~~The ~~external~~$1.4 ~~segment sales~~million, or ~~including stumpage sales, decreased 30~~20.41%, todecrease ~~$5.7~~in ~~million,~~external orTimberlands ~~6.4%~~Segment ~~of revenue~~sales in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2003,~~2004 compared to ~~$8.2 million, or 9.5% of revenue in~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2002. The~~2003 ~~decrease in external segment sales~~ reflects ana 1113.3% decrease in domestic log shipments, a 4767.80% decrease in export log shipments, and a 1027.48% decrease in ~~the~~export weighted average ~~domestic~~ sales realizations. These ~~and~~factors awere 2partially offset by an 8.13% ~~decrease~~ increase in ~~the~~domestic weighted average ~~export~~ sales realizations. These factors are discussed more fully below.

Internal sales of ~~logs~~ logs to our ~~manufacturing~~Manufacturing ~~segment~~Segment decreased ~~28.2%~~ to $78.9 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2003~~2004 ~~from~~compared to $~~10.~~9.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2002~~2003. ~~The~~ The decrease primarily reflects ~~the~~an ~~effects of a 17~~8.63% ~~decrease~~reduction in volume, due in large part to lower production ~~volume~~levels atin our Oregon manufacturing operations, following the shut-down of the dry-end operations at our ~~sawmills~~Prineville ~~and~~sawmill in April 2003. These decreases were partially offset by a 121.87% ~~decrease~~increase in average internal sales realizations reflecting ~~due~~higher tomarket ~~weak~~ log ~~market~~ ~~pricing. Our~~prices ~~internal~~in ~~transfer pricing~~the isfirst ~~based~~quarter onof ~~current~~2004 ~~market~~compared ~~prices at~~ to the ~~time~~first quarter of ~~sale~~2003.

~~Operating~~The ~~income from the timberlands segment decreased~~ $0.84 million, decrease orin ~~67.0%,~~Timberlands tooperating ~~$0.4~~income ~~million~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2003~~2004 ~~from~~compared to ~~$1.2 million in~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2002, primarily~~2003 aswas primarily a result of the decreased volume discussed ~~and~~above, ~~sales~~partially ~~realizations~~off-set ~~discussed~~by a $0.2 million reduction in overhead ~~above~~expenses.

Domestic Log Sales

Average external domestic prices received for logs sold from the various tree farms, excluding pulpwood, were as follows (dollars per thousand board feet or (“MBF”)):

	Quarter Ended September 30,
	Quarter Ended March 31,
Tree Farm	~~2003~~2004		~~2002~~2003		% Change
Oregon	$	624	—		—
Hamilton	$	490	$	421	16.4	%
Inland	—		$	404	—
Olympic	$	373	$	377	(1.1	)%
Hamilton	$	417	$	455	(8.4	)%
Weighted average	$	433	$	400	8.3	%
Olympic	$	369	$	400	(7.8	)%
Weighted average	$	388	$	433	(10.4	)%

17The increase at the Hamilton Tree Farm is due to higher market prices for logs and changes in species and grade mix, while the slight decrease at the Olympic Tree Farm reflects changes in species and grade mix.

~~During the third quarter of 2003, certain large diameter salvaged ponderosa pine from our Oregon Tree Farm was sold to an external customer.~~ All ~~other~~volume ~~production~~ from the Oregon Tree Farm was utilized by our Gilchrist mill~~. The~~ ~~decreases~~and attherefore, ~~the~~there ~~Hamilton~~were ~~and~~no ~~Olympic~~external ~~Tree~~sales ~~Farms~~from ~~are~~this ~~primarily~~tree ~~due to lower log market pricing and changes in species mix~~farm.

The domestic external volume from each of our tree farms was as follows (in MBF):

	Quarter Ended September 30,
	Quarter Ended March 31,
Tree Farm	~~2003~~2004	~~2002~~2003	% Change
Oregon	21	—	—
Hamilton	5,584	6,460	(13.6	)%
Inland	—	490	—
Olympic	5,307	6,107	(13.1	)%
Hamilton	4,255	7,425	(42.7	)%
Total	10,891	12,567	(13.3	)%
Olympic	6,758	4,521	49.5	%
Total	11,034	12,436	(11.3	)%

The ~~decrease~~decreases in ~~log shipments~~volume atfrom ~~our~~both ~~Hamilton~~tree ~~Tree Farm is due to fire related logging restrictions~~farms asare ~~well as temporary difficulties in finding logging contractors immediately following our chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The increase at our Olympic Tree Farm is~~ due to ~~increased~~reduced ~~production~~fee ~~levels in an effort to offset the impact of our May logging curtailment~~harvests. The fire related restrictions had less effect on the Olympic Tree Farm, as we were able to shift our mix of production to logging areas that were not as restricted. The fire related restrictions were lifted in mid-September for all of our tree farms.

We sold our Inland Tree Farm the first half of 2002. The volume shown above for the third quarter of 2002 represents the completion of a timber purchase commitment in the Inland region. There was no volume from our Inland Tree Farm during the third quarter of 2003.

Export Log Sales

~~Sales~~Information regarding sales of logs to customers involved in exporting activities were approximately $0.6 million, or 0.6% of revenues, in the third quarter of 2003, compared to $1.1 million, or 1.3% of revenues, for the same quarter of 2002. The average realization for export logs decreased 2.1% to $525/MBF in the third quarter of 2003 compared to $537/MBF in the third quarter of 2002. Sales volumes of export logs decreased 47.8% to 1,084 MBF in the third quarter of 2003 compared to 2,078 MBF in the third quarter of 2002. The decrease in sales volume and average realization is ~~primarily~~as ~~due to decreased demand for export logs.~~follows:

Property Sales

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2004			2003
Export sales revenue (in thousands)	$	134		$	563
As a percentage of total revenue	0.2		%	0.9		%
Sales volume (in MBF)	316			959
Average realizations ($/MBF)	$	424		$	587

~~There~~The ~~were~~decrease noin ~~significant~~export ~~property~~ sales volume is due to reduced availability of export grade logs in the areas ~~third~~of ~~quarter~~our Washington tree farms which are currently being harvested. In addition, higher domestic prices for such logs have currently mitigated much of ~~2003~~the oradvantage ~~2002~~from exporting them. The decrease in the average realizations is due to changes in product mix.

Manufacturing

~~External~~The ~~revenues from our sawmills were~~ $234.51 million, or 2618.39%, ofincrease ~~revenues~~ in ~~the~~external ~~third~~revenue ~~quarter~~from ~~of 2003,~~our ~~compared~~sawmills toin ~~$26.3~~the ~~million,~~first ~~or 30.5%~~ quarter of ~~sales~~2004 incompared to the ~~same~~first quarter of ~~2002. The~~ ~~decreased~~2003 ~~revenue~~ reflects a 9 30.82% ~~decrease~~increase in average external lumber sales ~~volumes and a 10.5% decline in chip revenue~~realizations, partially offset by a 27.40% ~~increase~~ decrease in ~~average~~ external lumber sales ~~realizations.~~ ~~The decreased sales volume primarily reflects lower production levels at our sawmills designed to lower per unit manufacturing costs to their optimum levels~~volumes. ~~The improved sales~~These ~~realizations~~factors ~~reflect~~are ~~the~~discussed ~~impact~~more offully ~~strengthening lumber market prices and product mix changes~~below.

Internal shipments decreased 1648.38% to 2.64 MMBF in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2003~~2004 compared to 34.16 MMBF in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2002~~2003, ~~partly~~primarily due to the disposition of our Trading ~~and~~ and Distribution ~~segment~~Segment in the second quarter of 2003.

The ~~operating~~improvement ~~loss from~~in ~~the~~operating ~~Manufacturing~~results ~~segment was $2.6 million~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2003~~ 2004 compared to ~~$4.9 million in~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2002. The loss in the third quarter of 2003~~ ~~includes~~2003 ais ~~$5.7~~primarily ~~million charge for estimated operating losses on timber purchase commitments through 2006. The loss in the third quarter of 2002 includes~~ a ~~$3.8~~result ~~million charge for estimated operating losses on timber purchase commitments and a $1.2 million charge for the write-off~~ of ~~retired assets. The improvement in operating results (excluding~~ the ~~effects~~improved ofrealizations ~~the~~and ~~charges~~improved ~~discussed above) is primarily a~~production ~~result~~efficiencies ofat ~~improved~~our ~~lumber~~saw ~~market prices~~mills, apartially ~~15.0%~~off-set ~~decrease~~by inlower ~~log~~sales volume.

costs, a 17.3% decrease in unit manufacturing costs and a 3.1% decrease in segment overhead expenses.

Average external prices received for lumber sales by region were as follows (dollars per MBF):

	Quarter Ended September 30,
	Quarter Ended March 31,
Region	~~2003~~2004		~~2002~~2003		% Change
Oregon	$	~~308~~345	$	~~298~~270	327.48	%
Washington	$	~~279~~344	$	~~275~~259	132.58	%
Weighted average	$	~~294~~345	$	~~287~~265	230.42	%

The ~~increases~~improvements in ~~reflect~~the average realizations are due to improved market prices resulting from strong demand from the ~~strengthening~~domestic ~~lumber~~housing market, ~~and~~as ~~shifts~~well as changes in product mix.

External lumber sales volumes decreased 9.8% in the third quarter of 2003 to 71.3 MMBF compared to 79.0 MMBF in the same period of 2002. External lumber sales volumes by region were as follows (in MBF):17

	Quarter Ended September 30,
Region	2003	2002	% Change
Oregon	37,423	42,381	(11.7	)%
Washington	33,836	36,593	(7.5	)%
Total	71,259	78,974	(9.8	)%

The decreased volume from both regions reflects production reductions at all of our sawmills.

Chip sales accounted for 2.0% of revenue in the third quarter of 2003, compared to 2.4% of revenue in the third quarter of 2002. Residual wood chip prices increased to $64 per bone dry unit (BDU) in the third quarter of 2003 compared to $59/BDU in the third quarter of 2002, reflecting slightly improved market conditions. Woodchip sales volume decreased 18.0% in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the third quarter of 2002 due to our lower lumber production in the third quarter of 2003 as discussed above.

Alliance Lumber

Our Alliance Lumber segment includes professional contractor service yards in Arizona and Nevada and involves the sale of lumber and building products. Total revenue from our Alliance Lumber segment increased 17.4% to $57.8 million, or 64.8% of total revenue, in the third quarter of 2003 compared to $49.2 million, or 57.1% of total revenue, in the third quarter of 2002. This increase primarily reflects increased sales volumes in Arizona and Reno, Nevada driven by strong demand in their respective regional housing markets as well as higher lumber prices. Unit volume, measured in total board feet, increased 11.6% during the third quarter of 2003 compared to the third quarter of 2002.

Operating income from our Alliance Lumber segment decreased 94.4% to $149,000 in the third quarter of 2003 compared to $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2002. The decrease in operating income reflects an increase in operating expenses and a decrease in gross margin. During the third quarter of 2003, we had to cover short lumber and panel positions during a period of rapidly rising prices and bankruptcy related supply shortages. Fire restrictions, panel industry curtailments, the rebuilding effort in Iraq and adverse weather conditions drove panel prices to record all time highs during the third quarter of 2003. In addition, many vendors continue to require COD or advance payment terms, leading to higher inventory costs and long lead times for receipt of inventories. We also incurred increased wages, which resulted from overtime expense in order to service back orders during a period of sporadic supply and high demand.

Discontinued Operations - Trading and Distribution

Our Trading and Distribution segment, which was comprised of operations based in Eugene, Oregon and Albuquerque, New Mexico, was sold during the second quarter of 2003. Accordingly, we had no sales from this segment during the third quarter of 2003. Sales from this segment totaled $34.7 million in the third quarter of 2002. The Trading and Distribution segment involved the wholesale trading of lumber, panels and other wood products, most of which were not manufactured by us.

Results of Operations

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

General

Revenues from continuing operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 decreased $3.5 million, or 1.4%, to $241.9 million, from $245.3 million in the same period of 2002. The decrease reflects lower revenues from our Timberlands and Manufacturing segments partially offset by increased revenues in our Alliance Lumber segment. The decreased revenues from our Timberlands and Manufacturing segments are due to temporary market related curtailments in these segments as well as weak market pricing for logs and lumber. The increase in the Alliance Lumber segment revenues reflects strong demand and increased sales volume.

Cost of products sold (including charges for losses on timber purchase commitments discussed below) as a percentage of sales increased to 94.1% in the first nine months of 2003, compared to 91.3% in the same period of 2002. The increase was primarily due to increased costs at our Alliance Lumber segment as a result of covering pre-existing contracts in an environment of rising market prices and trade credit problems and the relative absence of pricing discounts, as well as the larger loss on timber purchase commitments recognized in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the first nine months of 2002. Increased fuel and other energy costs, and lower production volumes in our Timberlands segments due to market-related curtailments in the second quarter of 2003, fire related harvesting restrictions and problems with retaining loggers following our chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in the third quarter of 2003, also contributed to the increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales.

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2003, we recognized non-cash losses on timber purchase commitments with the U.S. Forest Service and private timber deeds of $6.1 million, which represent the estimated probable losses to be recognized on these contracts through the completion date, or the estimated harvest dates, for these contracts. We entered into these contracts several years ago to ensure an adequate log supply for our Gilchrist and Prineville sawmills. Market pricing for the lumber output from these commitments has declined significantly since the commitments were made. Non-cash losses recognized on timber purchase commitments totaled $3.8 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002.

Gain on sale of assets held for sale of $7.4 million in the first nine months of 2002 represents the recognized gains on the sale of our Inland South and Inland North tree farms in March and April 2002, respectively.

The $0.8 million loss on disposal of assets in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 represents a $1.3 million loss on the sale of an aircraft in the second quarter of 2003, offset by a gain on sale of equipment of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2003. Loss on disposal of assets in the first nine months of 2002 of $1.2 million reflects the write-off of obsolete or retired assets.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $19.0 million (7.8% of revenues) in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $20.1 million (8.2% of revenues) in the first nine months of 2002. Decreases in salaries and related personnel costs due to lower headcount and cost reduction initiatives were partially offset by increases in insurance premiums.

Interest expense decreased to $24.3 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to $39.7 million in the first nine months of 2002. In accordance with SOP 90-7, interest expense in the 2003 period does not include contractual interest totaling $11.7 million on the Senior Notes and Acquisition Facility since the date of our chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on June 29, 2003. Please read “Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition Filing” above also.

Debt restructuring and redemption premium of $14.1 million in the first nine months of 2002 relates to our global debt restructuring in April 2002. Of the $14.1 million charge, $10.0 million was non-cash in nature. We

incurred a total of $8.7 million in fees and costs in connection with the April 2002 debt restructuring, $4.2 million of which was included in the $14.1 million loss recognized in the second quarter of 2002 in accordance with the provisions outlined in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-19 “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments,” (EITF 96-19). In addition, we expensed $5.5 million of previously deferred fees and expenses and a $4.5 million redemption premium. The redemption premium was incurred when we prepaid a portion of our senior notes in advance of their scheduled maturity. Payment of the redemption premium, according to the terms of the senior note restructuring, is deferred until December 31, 2005.

Amortization of debt issuance costs decreased $658,000 to $1.5 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease is due to the second quarter 2002 write-off of $5.5 million of previously deferred fees related to our senior notes as a result of our debt restructuring in April 2002. In addition, the amortization period for remaining deferred debt issuance costs was prospectively extended until December 2005, thereby lowering the amount amortized in each quarter. These decreases were partially offset by the recognition of $0.2 million of additional amortization of deferred debt issuance costs in 2003 on the pre-existing revolving credit facility which was terminated in July 2003. At September 30, 2003, we had $3.9 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, which are being amortized through December 31, 2005.

Debt restructuring negotiation costs of $4.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, consisting primarily of professional fees, represent charges incurred related to our reorganization and recapitalization efforts prior to our chapter 11 bankruptcy protection filing.

Reorganization items totaling $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2003 consisted primarily of professional fees and other charges incurred related to our reorganization and recapitalization efforts subsequent to June 29, 2003. We anticipate continuing to incur significant professional fees and court costs in future quarters related to our reorganization efforts under chapter 11.

Timberlands

Total external segment sales, including stumpage sales, decreased 39.6% to $16.9 million, or 7.0% of revenue in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $28.1 million, or 11.4% of revenue in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease in external segment sales reflects a 35.9% decrease in domestic log shipments, a 60.9% decrease in export log shipments and a 4.1% decrease in the weighted average domestic sales realizations.

Internal sales of logs to our manufacturing segment decreased 24.0% to $23.7 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $31.1 million in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease primarily reflects a 15.3% reduction in volume, due in large part to lower production volume at our sawmills, and an 8.9% decrease in average internal sales realizations due to weak log market pricing. Our internal transfer pricing is based on current market prices at the time of sale.

Operating income from the timberlands segment decreased $2.6 million, or 64.5%, to $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $4.1 million in the first nine months of 2002, primarily as a result of the decreased volume and sales realizations discussed above.

Domestic Log Sales

Average external domestic prices received for logs sold from the various tree farms, excluding pulpwood, were as follows (dollars per MBF):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
Tree Farm	2003		2002		% Change
Oregon	$	627	—		—
Inland	—		$	457	—
Hamilton	$	422	$	443	(4.7	)%
Olympic	$	374	$	381	(1.8	)%
Weighted average	$	397	$	414	(4.1	)%

During the first nine months of 2003, certain large diameter salvaged ponderosa pine from our Oregon Tree Farm was sold to an external customer. All other production from the Oregon Tree Farm was utilized by our Gilchrist mill. The decreases at the Hamilton and Olympic Tree Farms are primarily due to lower log market pricing and changes in species mix.

The domestic external volume from each of our tree farms was as follows (in MBF):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
Tree Farm	2003	2002	% Change
Oregon	248	—	—
Inland	—	7,863	—
Hamilton	13,470	16,189	(16.8	)%
Olympic	17,648	24,853	(29.0	)%
Total	31,366	48,905	(35.9	)%

The decreases at the Hamilton and Olympic Tree Farms are primarily a result of temporary difficulties retaining loggers following our chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in the third quarter of 2003 and temporary market-related harvest curtailments during the second quarter of 2003.

We sold a portion of our Inland Tree Farm in the first quarter of 2002 and sold the final portion on April 30, 2002. Therefore, there was low volume from our Inland Tree Farm during the first nine months of 2002 and none in the 2003 period, as the sale transaction had been completed.

Export Log Sales

Sales of logs to customers involved in exporting activities were approximately $1.3 million, or 0.5% of revenue, in the first nine months of 2003, compared to $3.0 million, or 1.2% of revenue, for the first nine months of 2002. The average realization for export logs increased 6.3% to $541/MBF in the first nine months of 2003 compared to $509/MBF in the first nine months of 2002. Sales volume of export logs decreased 60.9% to 2.3 MMBF in the first nine months of 2003 compared to 6.0 MMBF in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease in sales volume is primarily due to decreased demand for export logs. The increase in the average realization is primarily due to a greater proportion of higher grade logs during the first nine months of 2003 compared to the first nine months of 2002. We did not export any logs from our Inland Tree Farm and, therefore, our export sales were not affected by their disposition.

Property Sales

The disposition of the Inland South and Inland North tree farms in the first and second quarters of 2002 were reported as asset sales in the Corporate and Other segment. There were no other significant property sales in the first nine months of 2003 or 2002.

Manufacturing

External revenues from our sawmills decreased $15.3 million, or 19.8% to $62.0 million, or 25.7% of revenue, in the first nine months of 2003 from $77.4 million, or 31.5% of revenue, in the first nine months of 2002. The decreased revenues reflect a 6.8% decrease in average external lumber sales realizations, an 11.4% decrease in external lumber sales volumes and a 23.0% decline in chip revenue. The lower sales realizations reflect the impact of weak lumber market pricing and product mix changes. The lower sales volume reflects decreased production levels at all of our sawmills.

Internal shipments decreased 0.5% to 10.7 MMBF in the first nine months of 2003 compared to 10.8 MMBF in the first nine months of 2002, partly due to the disposition of our Trading and Distribution segment.

The operating loss from manufacturing was $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to an operating loss of $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2002. The $3.8 million loss in the first nine months of 2003 includes a $6.1 million charge for estimated losses on timber purchase commitments through 2006. The $2.2 million loss in the first nine months of 2002 includes a $3.8 million charge for estimated losses on timber purchase commitments through 2003 and a $1.2 million loss related to the write-off of retired equipment. The decline in operating results, exclusive of the charges discussed above, is primarily a result of decreased revenues as discussed above, as well as a 2.6% increase in segment overhead expense, partially off-set by a 17.3% decrease in per unit manufacturing expense and a 15.0% decrease in log costs. The increase in segment overhead expense is primarily a result of increased depreciation and costs related to the shut-down of our Prineville mill. The Prineville mill was not operated during the first four months of 2002, but was operating in the last eight months of 2002 and the first quarter of 2003 for drying and finishing of increased rough lumber production from the Gilchrist mill.

Average external prices received for lumber sales by region were as follows (dollars per MBF):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
Region	2003		2002		% Change
Oregon	$	282	$	298	(5.4	)%
Washington	$	266	$	290	(8.3	)%
Weighted average	$	275	$	295	(6.8	)%

The decreases reflect weak lumber market pricing and shifts in product mix.

External lumber sales volumes by region were as follows (in MBF):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Quarter Ended March 31,
Region	~~2003~~2004	~~2002~~2003	% Change
Oregon	~~109~~38,~~775~~576	~~130~~42,~~548~~172	(158.95	)%
Washington	9431,~~710~~699	~~100~~33,~~303~~380	(5.60	)%
Total	~~204~~70,~~485~~275	~~230~~75,~~851~~552	(117.40	)%

The decrease in ~~shipments~~volume from ~~both~~the ~~regions~~Oregon ~~reflects~~region ~~decreased~~is ~~production~~primarily atdue ~~all~~to the curtailment of dry-end operations at our Prineville sawmill subsequent to the first quarter of 2003, ~~sawmills~~and lower production levels in the 2004 period. The decrease in volume from the Washington region is due to lower production levels at our Washington saw mills.

~~Chip~~Following ~~sales accounted for~~is ~~2.0%~~information ofregarding ~~revenue~~our ~~in the first nine months of 2003, compared to 2.6% of revenue in the first nine months of 2002. Residual wood~~ chip ~~prices were up slightly to $62 per bone dry unit (BDU) in the first nine months of 2003 compared to $60 per BDU in the first nine months of 2002. Woodchip~~ sales ~~volume decreased 25.8% in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the first nine months of 2002 due to lower lumber production in the 2003 period compared to the 2002 period.~~:

Alliance Lumber

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2004			2003
Chip sales revenue (in thousands of dollars)	$	1,874		$	1,750
Chip sales as a percentage of revenue	2.3		%	2.6		%
Chip prices (per bone-dry unit (“BDU”))	$	65		$	59
Chip volume (in BDUs)	28,661			29,805

~~Our~~The ~~Alliance~~increase ~~Lumber segment includes professional contractor service yards~~ in ~~Arizona and Nevada~~ ~~and involves~~ the ~~sale~~price ofper ~~lumber~~BDU ~~and~~is ~~building~~due ~~products. Total~~to ~~revenue~~improved ~~from~~market ~~our~~prices ~~Alliance~~for ~~Lumber segment increased 18~~chips.0% The todecrease ~~$156.3 million, or 64.7% of total revenue,~~ in ~~the first~~volume ~~nine~~is ~~months~~due ~~of 2003 compared~~ to ~~$132.5 million, or 54.0% of total revenue, in~~ the ~~first nine months of 2002. This~~ ~~increase~~decrease ~~reflects increased sales volumes~~ in ~~all~~production ~~regions driven by strong demand in their respective regional housing markets, offset in part by lower sales realizations. Unit~~ volume~~, measured~~ inat ~~total~~our ~~board~~saw ~~feet~~mills, ~~increased~~as ~~17.5%~~chips ~~during~~are ~~the~~a ~~first~~by-product ~~nine months~~ of ~~2003~~saw ~~compared~~mill ~~to the first nine months of 2002~~operations.

~~Operating income from our~~ Alliance Lumber segment decreased 26.6% to $4.9 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to $6.7 million in the first nine months of 2002. The decrease in operating income reflects an increase in operating expenses and a decrease in gross margins. During the third quarter of 2003, we had to cover short lumber and panel positions during a period of rapidly rising prices and bankruptcy related supply shortages. Fire restrictions, panel industry curtailments, the rebuilding effort in Iraq and adverse weather conditions drove panel prices to record all time highs during the third quarter of 2003. In addition, manySegment

23Our Alliance Lumber Segment includes professional contractor service yards in Arizona and Nevada and involves the sale of lumber and building materials. Our Las Vegas, Nevada operations were sold in April 2004 and are reflected as discontinued operations for both periods presented. In addition, if an asset purchase agreement is signed and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, we anticipate selling our Reno, Nevada operations in the second quarter of 2004.

~~vendors~~The ~~continue~~$13.8 ~~to require~~million, ~~COD~~ or ~~advance payment terms~~39.8%, ~~leading~~increase toin ~~higher~~revenue ~~inventory~~from ~~costs~~our ~~and~~Alliance ~~long~~Lumber ~~lead~~Segment ~~times~~in ~~for~~the ~~receipt~~first quarter of ~~inventories.~~2004 Wecompared ~~also~~to ~~incurred~~the ~~increased~~first ~~wages,~~quarter of ~~which~~2003 ~~resulted~~reflects ~~from~~a ~~overtime~~7.2% ~~expense~~increase in ~~order~~unit tovolume, ~~service~~measured ~~back~~in ~~orders~~total ~~during~~board afeet, as ~~period~~well ofas ~~sporadic~~higher ~~supply~~market prices for lumber and ~~high~~paneling, ~~demand~~reflecting the strong housing market in the southwestern region of the United States.

~~Discontinued~~Operating ~~Operations~~income was flat in the comparable periods for our Alliance Lumber Segment. Increased revenues in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2003 were off-set ~~Trading~~by lower gross margins and ~~Distribution~~increased operating expenses. Gross margins were negatively impacted in the first quarter of 2004 by forward pricing commitments made to customers during a period of rising market prices for materials. Operating expenses were negatively impacted in the first quarter of 2004 by higher fuel costs and overtime labor costs incurred to meet higher sales volumes.

~~Our~~Corporate ~~Trading~~ and ~~Distribution~~ segment, which was comprised of operations based in Eugene, Oregon and Albuquerque, New Mexico, was sold during the second quarter of 2003. The Trading and Distribution segment involved the wholesale trading of lumber, panels and other wood products, most of which were not manufactured by us. Primarily due to the sale of this segment, sales from the Trading and Distribution segment decreased $98.5 million, or 74.3%, to $34.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 from $132.6 million in the first nine months of 2002.Other

The operating loss from ~~our~~ ~~Trading~~our Corporate and ~~Distribution~~Other ~~segment~~Segment ~~totaled~~increased from $51.98 million in the first ~~nine months~~ quarter of 2003 ~~compared~~ to ~~income of~~ $1.2.1 million in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of ~~2002, primarily~~2004. The ~~due~~larger toloss ~~the~~reflects ~~decreased~~increased ~~revenues~~costs asfor insurance ~~discussed above~~ and abad ~~$5.5~~debt ~~million charge for the impairment of goodwill, which occurred in the first quarter of 2003~~expense.

Critical Accounting Policies

We reaffirm the ~~critical~~ critical accounting policies and estimates described in our ~~2002~~2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~March 31,~~ ~~2003. Please~~April 22, ~~also read Note 1 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements regarding the application of SOP 90-7 in the second quarter of 2003~~2004.

~~New Accounting Pronouncements~~18

Please read Note 14 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements and their anticipated effects on the Partnership.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our pre-existing revolving credit facility was paid off and terminated in July 2003 and our acquisition credit facility was transferred to liabilities subject to compromise on June 29, 2003 upon our filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In July 2003 a $40 million debtor-in-possession financing agreement (“DIP Revolver”) ~~was approved by the court. The DIP Revolver~~ has a variable ~~rate~~ rate of interest. At ~~September~~March 31, 302004, ~~2003,~~ we had $2018.53 million outstanding under the DIP Revolver at an interest rate of 4.5%. A hypothetical 10 percent increase in interest rates to 4.95% would not have a material effect on our cash flows or results of operations.

The fair market value of long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Our acquisition facility has a variable rate of interest. Our senior notes and acquisition facility, included in liabilities subject to compromise at March 31, 2004, are not publicly traded and similar instruments are not available for comparison. We are therefore unable to estimate the fair value of the senior notes or acquisition facility.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Notes 1 and 2 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for a description of our bankruptcy proceedings.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

During the second quarter of 2003, we defaulted on our senior notes and on our acquisition credit facility as a result of not making scheduled interest payments and being out of compliance with the related covenants. All amounts due under these facilities were transferred to liabilities subject to compromise on June 29, 2003 upon our filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. We also defaulted on our revolving credit facility under cross-default provisions with the senior notes and acquisition facility agreements. The revolver was paid in full and terminated on July 3, 2003 (please see Note 4). Amounts included in liabilities subject to compromise at September 30, 2003 related to the senior notes and the acquisition credit facility were as follows (in thousands):

	Principal		Accrued Interest*		Other Fees		Total
Acquisition facility	$	112,372	$	1,848	—		$	114,220
Senior notes	400,658		24,717		$	5,761	431,136
Total	$	513,030	$	26,565	$	5,761	$	545,356

*Does not include contractual interest of $11.7 million subsequent to June 29, 2003.

Item 5. Other Information

The Partnership recently implemented several reorganization and management changes. True Carr, formerly Vice President of Alliance Lumber Segment, resigned from the Partnership on October 31, 2003. Effective immediately, long time operations and sales managers, respectively, Norb Edwardsen and Brian McMannis were promoted to co-general managers to oversee the Arizona operations of the Alliance Lumber segment. Jim Weeks, Vice President of Marketing and Sales, departed the Partnership on November 1, 2003 following the winding down of the former Trading and Distribution segment. Mr. Weeks’ position has been eliminated. Gary Cremer, Vice President of Resources, has become a Special Assistant to the President to assist senior management in various aspects of the restructuring process. Upon completion of these tasks, Mr. Cremer will leave the Partnership. His former responsibilities have been combined with the responsibilities of the Vice President of Manufacturing and will be assumed by John Ernst.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) The exhibits filed as part of this report are listed below and this list is intended to serve as the exhibit index:
3.1		Form of Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. (filed as Exhibit A to Part I of Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 83-85066).
3.2		Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Statement on Form S-1 No. 83-85066).
3.3		First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997).
3.4		Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).
3.5		Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(a) Exhibits

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
The following reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2003:
	•	Dated July 2, 2003 and furnished to the SEC on July 8, 2003 pursuant to Item 9. “Regulation FD Disclosure,” regarding the receipt by the Partnership of an interim order from the Bankruptcy Court approving the implementation of a $40 million debtor-in-possession loan facility; and
	•	Dated July 18, 2003 and furnished to the SEC on July 22, 2003 pursuant to Item 9. “Regulation FD Disclosure regarding the receipt by the Partnership of a final order from the Bankruptcy Court approving the implementation of a $40 million debtor-in-possession loan facility.

The exhibits filed as part of this report are listed below and this list is intended to serve as the exhibit index:

3.1		Form of Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. (filed as Exhibit A to Part I of Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 No. 83-85066).
3.2		Form of Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Statement on Form S-1 No. 83-85066).
3.3		First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997).
3.4		Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).
3.5		Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crown Pacific Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

We did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:	November 13, 2003		CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P.
Date: May 26, 2004	CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS, L.P.
	By: Crown Pacific Management Limited Partnership, as General Partner		~~By: Crown Pacific Management Limited Partnership, as General Partner~~
	By:	/s/ Steven E. Dietrich	~~By:~~	~~/s/ Steven E. Dietrich~~
	Steven E. Dietrich		~~Steven E. Dietrich~~
			Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)		~~(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)~~

2720

Filing Compare · CROWN PACIFIC PARTNERS L P