UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ~~WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549~~

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2004
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2005

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 000-27863

NORTEM N.V. ~~(formerly Metron Technology N.V.) (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)~~

~~The Netherlands~~ (~~State~~Exact orname ~~other jurisdiction~~ of ~~incorporation~~registrant oras ~~organization)~~specified ~~98-0180010~~in ~~(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number~~its charter)

Ind. Terrein Bijsterhuizen (Noord) 21-01 POB 250 NL-6600 AG Wijchen The Netherlands (Address of principal executive offices)

The Netherlands		98-0180010
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

Ind. Terrein Bijsterhuizen (Noord) 21-01
POB 250
NL-6600 AG Wijchen
The Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +31 (0)6 2742 0248


(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

~~Registrant's~~Indicate ~~telephone~~by ~~number,~~check ~~including~~mark ~~area~~whether ~~code:~~the ~~+31~~registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(0d)6 ~~2742~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) ~~0248~~has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

~~Metron~~Yes ~~Technology~~ý ~~N.V.,~~No ~~4425 Fortran Drive, San Jose, California 95134-2300 (Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)~~ o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ~~(1) has~~is ~~filed~~an ~~all~~accelerated ~~reports~~filer ~~required~~(as todefined bein ~~filed by Section~~Rule ~~13 or 15(d)~~ 12b-2 of the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports~~)~~, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days~~. ~~Yes ý No o~~

~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).~~ Yes o No ý ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer'’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Title of Each Class		Outstanding at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2004~~2005
Common shares, par value EURO 0.44 per share		12,883,979

NORTEM N.V. ~~(formerly Metron Technology N.V.)~~ in Liquidation

INDEX

			Page No.
Part I.		Financial Information
Part I.		Financial Information
Item 1.		Financial Statements
Item 1.		Financial Statements	3
	Statement of Net Assets in Liquidation (Unaudited) as of February 28, 2005
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended November 30, 2004 and 2003	3
	Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation (Unaudited) for the period from December 15, 2004 (start of liquidation) through February 28, 2005
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of November 30, 2004 and May 31, 2004	4
	Statement of Receipts and Disbursements (Unaudited) for the period from December 15, 2004 (start of liquidation) through February 28, 2005
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Six-Month Periods Ended November 30, 2004 and 2003	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the period from December 1 - 14, 2004, the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004 and the three and nine-month periods ended February 29, 2004
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of December 14, 2004 and May 31, 2004
Item 2.		Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004 and the nine-month period ended February 29, 2004
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	29
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Part II.		Other Information
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	31
Item 4		Controls and Procedures
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	31
Part II. Other Information
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 5.		Other Information	33
Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 6.		Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	35
Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Signature			37
Item 5.		Other Information
Item 6.		Exhibits
Signature

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NORTEM N.V. ~~(formerly Metron Technology N.V.) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (Dollars~~ in ~~thousands except per share data)~~ Liquidation

	Three months ended November 30,						Six months ended November 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Net revenue	$	51,068		$	44,022		$	113,794		$	90,960
Cost of revenue		39,806			34,900			88,878			72,256
Gross profit		11,262			9,122			24,916			18,704
Selling, general and administrative expenses		12,966			13,221			25,078			26,105
Research, development and engineering expenses		543			796			1,075			1,103
Closing costs for sale of subsidiaries and substantially all assets to Applied Materials, Inc.		2,414			—			2,414			—
Restructuring costs		860			1,410			1,303			2,532
Operating loss		(5,521	)		(6,305	)		(4,954	)		(11,036	)
Other expense, net		(475	)		(785	)		(1,153	)		(1,143	)
Loss before income taxes		(5,996	)		(7,090	)		(6,107	)		(12,179	)
Income tax provision		155			378			619			471
Net loss	$	(6,151	)	$	(7,468	)	$	(6,726	)	$	(12,650	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.59	)	$	(0.52	)	$	(1.00	)
Weighted average number of shares for basic and diluted		12,843			12,645			12,838			12,627

STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	February 28,
	2005
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	87,893
Due from Applied Materials, Inc. for reimbursement of liquidation costs	1,810
Loan to shareholder	110
Interest receivable	153
Total assets	$	89,966

LIABILITIES
Payable to convertible debentures and warrant holders	$	18,017
Advances due to warrant holders	5,556
Liquidation liabilities	970
Due to Applied Materials, Inc	159
Accrued interest payable to convertible debentures holders	83
Total liabilities	24,785

Net assets in liquidation	$	65,181

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NORTEM N.V. ~~(formerly Metron Technology N.V.) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (Dollars~~ in ~~thousands except share and per share data)~~ Liquidation

			November 30, 2004			May 31, 2004
ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	11,487		$	12,107
	Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,173 and $1,251, respectively			36,554			43,937
	Amounts due from affiliates			238			2,050
	Loan to officer/shareholder			110			110
	Inventories			39,414			46,719
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			9,914			12,384
		Total current assets		97,717			117,307
	Property, plant and equipment, net			18,889			20,035
	Intangibles and other assets, net			7,657			8,171
		Total assets	$	124,263		$	145,513
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Accounts payable		$	21,453		$	34,847
	Amounts due to affiliates			599			3,044
	Accrued wages and employee-related expenses			5,120			4,716
	Deferred revenue			5,484			11,187
	Short term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt			16,069			13,882
	Accrued closing costs for sale of assets to Applied Materials, Inc.			2,414			—
	Amounts payable to shareholders			54			149
	Other current liabilities			10,452			13,423
		Total current liabilities		61,645			81,248
Long-term debt, excluding current portion				6,125			7,745
Convertible debentures				6,787			1,531
Other long-term liabilities				6,173			7,321
		Total liabilities		80,730			97,845
Commitments				—			—
Shareholders' equity:
	Preferred shares, par value EUR 0.44; Authorized: 10,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding: none			—			—
	Common shares and additional paid-in capital, par value EUR 0.44; Authorized: 40,000,000 shares Issued: 14,238,642 and 14,179,036 shares, respectively Outstanding: 12,843,741 and 12,784,135 shares, respectively			48,564			47,459
	Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)			(6,027	)		699
	Cumulative other comprehensive income			1,609			123
	Treasury shares: 1,394,901 shares			(613	)		(613	)
		Total shareholders' equity		43,533			47,668
		Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	124,263		$	145,513

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	For the period December 15, 2004 (start of liquidation) to February 28, 2005

Gain on sale of subsidiaries and substantially all assets to Applied Materials, Inc.	$	36,568
Acceleration of interest accretion, and amortization of discount and placement agent fees for convertible debentures	(6,664		)
Incremental cost of cash settlement to convertible debenture and warrant holders	(5,017		)
Liquidation expenses net of expected recoveries	(1,203		)
Interest income	399
Interest expense	(125		)
Changes in net assets	23,958
Net assets in liquidation at December 14, 2004	41,223
Net assets in liquidation at February 28, 2005	$	65,181

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NORTEM N.V. ~~(formerly Metron Technology N.V.) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (Dollars~~ in ~~thousands)~~ Liquidation

				Six months ended November 30,
				2004			2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss			$	(6,726	)	$	(12,650	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization				3,282			2,842
	Non-cash interest for accretion of convertible debenture discount and amortization of debt issuance costs				504			—
	Restructuring costs, non-cash portion				24			469
	Other				37			56
	Changes in assets and liabilities:
		Accounts receivable			7,421			1,829
		Amounts due from affiliates			1,812			(259	)
		Inventories			7,402			3,035
		Prepaid expenses and other current assets			2,468			604
		Accounts payable			(13,394	)		1,527
		Amounts due to affiliates			(2,445	)		(374	)
		Accrued wages and employee-related expenses			404			303
		Deferred revenue			(5,703	)		1,628
		Accrued closing costs for sale of assets to Applied Materials, Inc.			2,414			—
		Other current liabilities			(2,970	)		(487	)
		Other non-current assets and liabilities			14			(587	)
		Net cash flows used in operating activities			(5,456	)		(2,064	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Additions to property, plant and equipment				(963	)		(1,200	)
	Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment				129			—
			Net cash flows used in investing activities		(834	)		(1,200	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings				1,984			(4,299	)
	Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt				—			103
	Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures				6,000			7,000
	Issuance costs of convertible debentures				(364	)		(287	)
	Principal payments on long-term debt				(2,682	)		(491	)
	Principal payments on indebtedness to officer and shareholder				(95	)		(85	)
	Proceeds from issuance of common shares				150			106
			Net cash flows provided by financing activities		4,993			2,047
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					677			(158	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents					(620	)		(1,375	)
Beginning cash and cash equivalents					12,107			12,179
Ending cash and cash equivalents				$	11,487		$	10,804

STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	For the period December 15, 2004 (start of liquidation) to February 28, 2005

Cash and cash equivalents as of December 14, 2004	$	2,027

RECEIPTS
Proceeds on sale of subsidiaries and substantially all assets to Applied Materials, Inc	84,567
Advances from warrant holders	5,556
Refunded value added tax	373
Interest income	246
Total receipts	90,742

DISBURSEMENTS
Legal services	2,787
Directors & officers insurance premium	833
Financial advisory services	425
Accounting and tax services	412
Directors & officers salary, fees & expenses	118
Other	301
Total disbursements	4,876

Cash and cash equivalents as of February 28, 2005	$	87,893

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NORTEM N.V. ~~(formerly Metron Technology N.V.) NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)~~

~~1. BASIS~~CONDSENSED CONSOLIDATED OFSTATEMENTS ~~PRESENTATION AND ACQUISITION~~ OF ~~CERTAIN~~OPERATIONS ~~ASSETS OF NORTEM N.V.~~ (~~FORMERLY METRON TECHNOLOGY N.V.~~Unaudited) ~~BY APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.~~

~~Unaudited~~(Dollars ~~Interim~~in ~~Financial~~thousands ~~Information~~ except per share data)

The financial statements in this Form 10-Q are presented on a going concern basis since the required shareholder approval of the sale of the Company's subsidiaries and substantially all of its assets to Applied Materials, Inc ("Applied"—See below) occurred on December 10, 2004, which was subsequent to the date of these financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements (including notes to condensed consolidated financial statements) of Nortem N.V. ("Nortem" or the "Company," formerly Metron Technology, N.V.) included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for their fair presentation. This report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, as filed with the SEC.

	For the fourteen days ended December 14, 2004			For the three months ended February 29, 2004			For the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004			For the nine months ended February 29, 2004

Net revenue	$	5,680		$	52,739		$	119,474		$	143,699
Cost of revenue	4,594			41,202			93,472			113,458
Gross profit	1,086			11,537			26,002			30,241
Selling, general and administrative expenses	2,356			13,260			27,434			39,365
Research, development and engineering expenses	119			705			1,194			1,808
Transaction costs for sale of subsidiaries and substantially all assets to Applied Materials, Inc.	221			—			2,635			—
Stock based compensation resulting from acceleration of options	2,523			—			2,523			—
Restructuring costs	82			724			1,385			3,256
Operating loss	(4,215		)	(3,152		)	(9,169		)	(14,188		)
Other expense, net	(619		)	(776		)	(1,772		)	(1,919		)
Loss before income taxes	(4,834		)	(3,928		)	(10,941		)	(16,107		)
Income tax provision	213			211			832			682
Net loss	$	(5,047	)	$	(4,139	)	$	(11,773	)	$	(16,789	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.39	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.92	)	$	(1.33	)

Weighted average number of shares for basic and diluted	12,881			12,662			12,841			12,639

~~Acquisition~~The ofaccompanying ~~Nortem~~Notes are ~~N.V.~~an ~~(Formerly~~integral ~~Metron~~part ~~Technology~~of ~~N.V.)~~the byCondensed ~~Applied~~ Consolidated Financial Statements.

On December 10, 2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement"), dated August 16, 2004, with Applied. Concurrently with the close of the transaction on December 14, 2004, the Company changed its name to Nortem N.V., filed for liquidation in the Netherlands, the Managing Board of Directors resigned, and the liquidators approved by the Company's shareholders, assumed the management responsibilities of the Company.

Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold to Applied the outstanding shares of its worldwide operating subsidiaries and substantially all of the other assets of the Company, including, but not limited to, the Company's intellectual property and technology and all cash and cash equivalents other than an amount equal to $2.0 million plus cash received prior to closing upon exercise of warrants and options. Under the Purchase Agreement, Applied (a) paid the Company the sum of $84.6 million; (b) assumed certain of the Company's liabilities; (c) will pay the Company amounts related to certain Netherlands surtax liabilities and withholding obligations; and (d) will reimburse the Company for up to $2.75 million of certain costs after the close of the transaction. The Company's shareholders will not receive any payments directly from Applied. The Company expects to record a gain of approximately $20 million to $25 million from the sale of the subsidiaries and substantially all of its assets to Applied.

Following the closing of the transaction and the satisfaction of the Company's liabilities, the Company will distribute cash in two or more distributions to its shareholders. The Company expects to make an initial liquidating distribution by the end of February 2005. At the conclusion of the liquidation process, which the Company expects will be completed approximately six months following the closing of the transaction with Applied, any cash of the Company remaining after the satisfaction of its liabilities will be distributed to its shareholders. The Company estimates that the total amount of distributions to shareholders in connection with the transaction with Applied and the subsequent liquidation and dissolution of the Company will be in the range of approximately $4.70 to approximately $4.79 per share, excluding the effect of tax withholding requirements that apply differently to each shareholder. This range considers both settlement options for the convertible debenture (either cash payment or the conversion to shares) as described in Note 4, and also assumes the exercise of the warrants.

~~The Company's~~NORTEM ~~Supervisory Board and liquidators have not established a timetable for any distributions to its shareholders~~N. ~~The Company is unable at this time to predict the precise amount or timing of any distributions~~V. The amount and timing of the above-described distributions are dependent upon a variety of factors, including the timing and costs of winding up the Company's business and dissolving, the ultimate method under which the convertible debentures are settled and other factors. In the event that the Company's liabilities exceed current estimates or unanticipated issues arise in connection with the satisfaction of the Company's liabilities, the liquidating distribution to the Company's shareholders will be less than currently estimated and may be made later than currently anticipated.

~~Pro~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~forma~~BALANCE ~~net~~SHEETS ~~assets of the Company after the closing of the transaction with Applied consisted of the following estimates:~~ (Unaudited)

				December 14, 2004 Pro Forma
(Dollars in millions)
Assets
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	86.6
	Loan to shareholder				0.1
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets				2.1
		Total assets			88.8
Liabilities
	Current liabilities				2.5
	Convertible debentures principal (See Note 4)				13.0
	Deferred tax liability				0.4
		Total liabilities			15.9
			Net assets	$	72.9

(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

As of November 30, 2004, the Company had accounts receivable from Applied of approximately $0.3 million. The Company sold approximately $0.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of products to Applied for the three and six-month periods ended November 30, 2004.

	December 14,			May 31,
	2004			2004
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,027		$	12,107
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $0 and $1,251, respectively	—			43,937
Amounts due from affiliates	—			2,050
Loan to officer/shareholder	110			110
Inventories	—			46,719
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—			12,384
Assets held for sale to Applied Materials, Inc.	116,318			—
Total current assets	118,455			117,307
Property, plant and equipment, net	—			20,035
Intangibles and other assets, net	496			8,171
Total assets	$	118,951		$	145,513

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	—		$	34,847
Amounts due to affiliates	—			3,044
Accrued wages and employee-related expenses	—			4,716
Deferred revenue	—			11,187
Short term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	—			13,882
Accrued transaction costs for sale of assets to Applied Materials, Inc.	2,414			—
Amounts payable to shareholders	—			149
Other current liabilities	163			13,423
Liabilities held for sale to Applied Materials, Inc.	68,319			—
Total current liabilities	70,896			81,248

Long-term debt, excluding current portion	—			7,745
Convertible debentures	6,832			1,531
Other long-term liabilities	—			7,321
Total liabilities	77,728			97,845
Commitments	—			—

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred shares, par value EUR 0.44; Authorized: 10,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding: none	—			—
Common shares and additional paid-in capital, par value EUR 0.44; Authorized: 40,000,000 shares Issued: 14,278,880 and 14,179,036 shares, respectively Outstanding: 12,883,979 and 12,784,135 shares, respectively	51,191			47,459
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(11,074		)	699
Cumulative other comprehensive income	1,719			123
Treasury shares: 1,394,901 shares	(613		)	(613		)
Total shareholders’ equity	41,223			47,668
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	118,951		$	145,513

~~2. SUMMARY~~The OFaccompanying ~~SIGNIFICANT~~Notes are ~~ACCOUNTING~~an ~~POLICIES~~ integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company's revenue consists primarily of product revenues generated from the sale of equipment and materials and revenues associated with the provision of services. Revenue is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB104), which superceded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB101). SAB 104 incorporates Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which was implemented by the company during its second quarter of fiscal 2004. EITF 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF 00-21 on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant.

The Company buys equipment made by original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") for resale where it acts as principal, including taking title to the equipment and assuming all responsibility for installation and warranty. These equipment sales are recorded as "multiple element" transactions in which the portion of the sale represented by future installation is deferred, and only the residual amount of the sale representing the equipment itself is recognized upon shipment to the customer. In

~~certain circumstances,~~NORTEM depending on the specific terms of the transaction, such as when the customer's retainage exceeds the amount of deferred installation revenue, all or a portion of the residual equipment revenue is deferredN. ~~Installation revenue and deferred equipment revenue, if any, are recognized upon completion of the installation and the customer's acknowledgement that the equipment is available for production use~~V. Occasionally, the Company sells equipment as agent for OEMs and recognizes commission income, rather than revenue from an equipment sale, upon shipment. The Company continues to expand its capability to manufacture and rebuild certain legacy equipment ("Legends Product Line") as it acquires rights to do so from OEMs. Revenues from the sale of legacy equipment where the Company does not have a manufacturing history are recognized upon customer acceptance.

~~Revenues from~~CONDENSED ~~the sale of materials and other products other than equipment are generally recognized on the shipment of goods to customers. Revenue from service agreements is recognized~~CONSOLIDATED ~~ratably~~STATEMENTS ~~over~~OF ~~the~~CASH ~~agreement~~FLOWS period, while revenue from service without a service agreement is recognized in the periods in which the services are rendered to customers when all of the other criteria for revenue recognition are met. (Unaudited)

~~Loss~~(Dollars ~~Per~~in ~~Share~~ thousands)

Basic and diluted loss per common share are based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding in each period were as follows:

	For the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004			For the nine months ended February 29, 2004

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(11,773	)	$	(16,789	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	3,499			4,845
Stock based compensation resulting from acceleration of options	2,523
Non-cash interest for accretion of convertible debenture discount and amortization of debt issuance costs	555			172
Restructuring costs, non-cash portion	24			469
Other	14			25
Changes in assets and liabilities, exclusive of sale to Applied:
Accounts receivable	10,091			2,031
Amounts due from affiliates	1,852			(59		)
Inventories	6,864			3,193
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	3,068			461
Accounts payable	(16,876		)	805
Amounts due to affiliates	(2,565		)	(3,545		)
Accrued wages and employee-related expenses	1,492			(344		)
Deferred revenue	(5,429		)	936
Other current liabilities	(2,875		)	(228		)
Other non-current assets and liabilities	114			(515		)
Net cash flows used in operating activities	(9,422		)	(8,543		)
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(1,000		)	(1,794		)
Purchase of Eclipse product line inventories and license agreement	—			(13,677		)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment	126			68
Accrued transaction costs for sale of assets to Applied Materials, Inc.	2,414			—
Cash transferred to Applied Materials, Inc upon sale	(7,161		)	—
Net cash flows used in investing activities	(5,621		)	(15,403		)
Cash flows provided by financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings	1,130			(1,537		)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and license obligation for the Eclipse product line	—			13,677
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	—			156
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures	6,000			7,000
Issuance costs of convertible debentures	(364		)	(287		)
Principal payments on long-term debt	(2,775		)	(155		)
Principal payments on indebtedness to officer and shareholder	(95		)	(128		)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares	253			357
Net cash flows provided by financing activities	4,149			19,083
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	814			(269		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(10,080		)	(5,132		)
Beginning cash and cash equivalents	12,107			12,179
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	2,027		$	7,047

		Three months ended November 30,				Six months ended November 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003
Weighted average shares		12,843,000		12,645,000		12,838,000		12,627,000

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following share equivalents excluded from diluted earnings per share for the quarters and year-to date periods of fiscal 2005 and 2004 because their effect was anti-dilutive:

	Three months ended November 30,		Six months ended November 30,
	2004	2003	2004	2003
Share equivalents for stock options	3,673,000	3,797,000	3,673,000	4,532,000
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debentures (excluding shares that may be issued in payment of interest)	3,611,000	1,847,000	3,611,000	1,847,000
Shares issuable upon exercise of warrants (issued in conjunction with convertible debentures)	1,634,000	867,000	1,634,000	867,000

~~Inventories~~ NORTEM N.V. in Liquidation

~~Inventories~~NOTES ~~consist~~TO ~~primarily~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ofFINANCIAL ~~purchased~~STATEMENTS ~~products and are stated at the lower of cost~~ (~~first-in, first-out or weighted average basis~~Unaudited) ~~or net realizable value. Provisions are made for slow-moving and obsolete items. Components of inventory were as follows:~~

	November 30, 2004		May 31, 2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
Raw materials	$	1,146	$	1,714
Work in process		3,427		4,687
Equipment, spare parts and material inventory		31,283		32,908
Equipment delivered to customers pending acceptance		3,558		7,410
Inventories	$	39,414	$	46,719

1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

~~Accounting~~On ~~for~~December 10, 2004, the shareholders of Nortem N.V. (“Nortem” or the “Company,” formerly Metron Technology N.V.) approved both the Stock ~~Options~~ and Asset Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”), dated August 16, 2004, with Applied Materials Inc (“Applied”) and the proposal for the dissolution and liquidation of Nortem immediately following the closing of the above mentioned sale to Applied. Concurrently with the close of the transaction on December 14, 2004, the Company changed its name from Metron Technology N.V. to Nortem N.V., the Managing Board of Directors of the Company resigned, the liquidators approved by the shareholders assumed control of the Company and the process of liquidation began. On December 16, 2004, the Company filed for liquidation in the Netherlands. The financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of February 28, 2005 and for the period from December 15, 2004 (date of liquidation) to February 28, 2005 are presented on the liquidation basis of accounting. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their anticipated settlement amount, if reasonably estimable. The liquidation financial statements and the condensed consolidated financial statements (including notes to condensed consolidated financial statements) of Nortem included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

~~The~~In ~~Company~~the ~~uses~~opinion of management, the ~~intrinsic~~accompanying condensed ~~value-based~~consolidated ~~method~~financial ~~under~~statements ~~the~~reflect ~~provisions~~all ofadjustments, ~~Accounting~~consisting only ~~Principles~~of ~~Board~~normal ~~No. 25~~recurring toadjustments, ~~account~~necessary for ~~employee~~their ~~stock-based compensation~~fair ~~plans~~statement. ~~The~~This report ~~Company~~should ~~has~~be ~~adopted~~read ~~the~~in ~~disclosure~~conjunction ~~requirements~~with ofthe ~~SFAS 148,~~consolidated ~~Accounting~~financial ~~for~~statements and ~~Stock~~notes ~~Based~~thereto ~~Compensation~~for ~~Transition~~the ~~and Disclosure~~fiscal ~~(an~~year ~~amendment~~ended ~~of SFAS~~May ~~123).~~31, As2004 ~~the~~included ~~result~~in of the Company’s ~~transaction~~Annual ~~with~~Report ~~Applied~~on Form 10-K, ~~the~~as ~~Company's~~amended, ~~stock~~as ~~option~~filed ~~plans~~with ~~terminated~~the ~~in December 2004~~SEC.

The ~~following~~ ~~pro-forma~~financial ~~information~~statements ~~has been prepared~~ as ifof ~~the~~and ~~Company had accounted~~ for ~~its~~periods ~~stock options and ESPP using the fair value accounting method established by~~prior ~~SFAS~~to December ~~123.~~14, ~~Additional~~2004 ~~compensation~~are ~~expense~~presented ~~arising~~on ~~from~~a ~~the~~going ~~application~~concern ofbasis ~~SFAS 123~~and ~~has~~are ~~been~~not comparable ~~estimated~~with ~~using~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~financial ~~option~~statements ~~valuation~~subsequent ~~method~~to ~~from~~December 14, ~~the date of grant. For purposes~~2004 ofwhich ~~the~~are ~~pro~~prepared ~~forma~~on ~~disclosures~~a ~~below,~~liquidation ~~additional compensation cost is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period~~basis.

	Three months ended November 30,						Six months ended November 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net loss:
Net loss as reported	$	(6,151	)	$	(7,468	)	$	(6,726	)	$	(12,650	)
Fair value of stock based employee compensation expense (a) (b)		411			744			1,405			1,415
Stock based employee compensation expense in the financial Statements as reported		—			—			—			—
Pro forma net loss	$	(6,562	)	$	(8,212	)	$	(8,131	)	$	(14,065	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share
As reported	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.59	)	$	(0.52	)	$	(1.00	)
Pro forma	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.65	)	$	(0.63	)	$	(1.11	)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~(a) Based on~~Revenue the following assumptions for stock option grants in the second fiscal quarter of 2004: risk-free weighted average interest rates of 3.2%. There were no grants of options during the second quarter of fiscal 2005. Risk-free weighted average interest rates for the six-month periods ended November 30, 2004 and 2003 were 3.9% and 2.6%, respectively. The weighted average expected option lives is 5.0 years for all periods; with no dividend yield in any period. A volatility of 80% and 83% has been used for the three and six-month periods ended November 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Recognition

Prior to the sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets to Applied, the Company’s revenue consisted primarily of product revenues generated from the sale of equipment and materials and revenues associated with the provision of services. Revenue was recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB104), which superceded Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB101). SAB 104 incorporates Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which was implemented by the company during its second quarter of fiscal 2004. EITF 00-21 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing EITF 00-21 on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations was not significant.

The Company bought equipment made by original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) for resale where it acted as principal, which included the taking title to the equipment and assumption of all responsibility for installation and warranty. These equipment sales were recorded as “multiple element” transactions in which the portion of the sale represented by future installation was deferred, and only the residual amount of the sale that represented the equipment itself was recognized upon shipment to the customer. When the specific terms of the transaction, such as when the customer’s retainage exceeded the amount of deferred installation revenue, all or a portion of the residual equipment revenue was deferred. Installation revenue and deferred equipment revenue, if any, were recognized upon completion of the installation and the customer’s acknowledgement that the equipment is available for production use. Occasionally, the Company sold equipment as agent for OEMs and recognized commission income, rather than revenue from an equipment sale, upon shipment. Additionally, the Company manufactured and rebuilt certain legacy equipment as it acquired the rights to do so from OEMs. Revenues from the sale of legacy equipment where the Company does not have a manufacturing history were recognized upon customer acceptance.

~~(b) Based on~~Revenues ~~the~~from ~~following assumptions for~~ the ~~ESPP~~sale ~~for~~of ~~both~~materials ~~the three~~ and ~~six-month~~other ~~periods~~products other ~~ended~~than ~~November 30,~~equipment ~~2004:~~were ~~risk-free~~generally ~~weighted~~recognized ~~average~~on ~~interest rates~~the shipment of 1goods to customers.~~29%,~~ ~~weighted~~Revenue ~~average~~from ~~expected~~service ~~option~~agreements ~~lives~~ was ~~6 months;~~recognized ~~there~~ratably ~~was~~over nothe agreement ~~dividend~~period, ~~yield~~while inrevenue ~~each~~from ~~period~~service ~~and~~without a ~~volatility~~service ofagreement ~~80%~~was recognized ~~has~~in ~~been~~the ~~used.~~periods ~~During~~in which the ~~three~~services ~~and~~were ~~six-month~~rendered to customers when ~~periods~~all ~~ended~~of ~~November 30,~~the ~~2003~~other ~~there~~criteria ~~was~~for norevenue ~~ESPP~~recognition ~~activity.~~were met.

~~3. PURCHASES~~Loss OFPer ~~PRODUCT LINE~~ Share

InBasic September 2003, the Company acquired certain assets related to the Eclipse physical vapor deposition equipment product line from Tokyo Electron Ltd. ("TEL"). These assets consisted of $7.6 million of inventories, $6.0 million of intellectual properties pursuant to a license agreement and ~~$0.1 million~~ ofdiluted ~~other~~loss assets. As consideration, Metron Technology Distribution Corporation (MTDC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued to TEL a five-year promissory note in the principal amount of approximately $7.7 million, which bears interest at approximately 1.6% per ~~annum,~~common ~~primarily~~share ~~for the purchase of Eclipse inventory at fair value. Principal and interest~~ are ~~payable~~based ~~quarterly beginning September 2004 over a five-year period. As part of~~ on the ~~agreement, MTDC paid approximately $33,000 at closing for the excess over $100,000 of TEL's net book value of fixed assets acquired. Additionally, MTDC entered into a royalty~~weighted-~~free,~~average ~~irrevocable,~~number worldwide, perpetual, and nontransferable license agreement providing for payments by MTDC over a 5-year period totaling $6.0 million and an agreement to sublease the facility used by TEL in connection with manufacturing of ~~the~~common ~~Eclipse products.~~shares ~~The~~outstanding ~~fair value of the license agreement ($6.0 million) has been recorded~~ in ~~intangibles and other long-term assets and is being amortized to cost of revenue ($0.3 million for~~ each ofperiod ~~our first two quarters of fiscal 2005) on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of 5 years. The current~~ and ~~future payment~~ obligations for the license ($6.0 million) agreement has been recorded in other current liabilities of $1.2 million and other long-term liabilities of $3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of November 30, 2004. As a result of the transaction with Applied, the license agreement and note payable to TEL were ~~assigned to Applied, however, the Company will remain~~ as ~~guarantor.~~ follows:

At November 30, 2004, the future amortization of the acquired intangible assets was as follows:

	For the fourteen days ended December 14, 2004	For the three months ended February 29, 2004	For the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004	For the nine months ended February 29, 2004

Weighted average shares	12,881,000	12,662,000	12,841,000	12,639,000

Fiscal Year	(Dollars in thousands)
2005	$	600
2006		1,200
2007		1,200
2008		1,200
2009		400
Total	$	4,600

The following share equivalents excluded from diluted loss per share for the quarterly and year-to date periods of fiscal 2005 and 2004 because their effect was anti-dilutive:

	For the fourteen days ended December 14, 2004	For the three months ended February 29, 2004	For the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004	For the nine months ended February 29, 2004

Share equivalents for stock options	3,673,000	4,251,000	3,673,000	4,251,000
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debentures (excluding shares that may be issued in payment of interest)	3,611,000	1,847,000	3,611,000	1,847,000
Shares issuable upon exercise of warrants (issued in conjunction with convertible debentures)	1,634,000	867,000	1,634,000	867,000

Accounting for Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25”. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is based on the difference, if any, between the estimated fair value of our common stock on the date of grant and the exercise price.

The Purchase Agreement signed on August 16, 2004 provided that options and other awards under the Company Stock Plans would accelerate and become fully vested on or before the completion of the transaction with Applied, which took place on December 14, 2004. On November 22, 2004, the Company offered all vested and unvested option holders under the Company Stock Option Plans an opportunity to have their options “cashed out” at a price that reflects the amount that would be distributed to the holders of common shares, less the exercise price of the options. The majority of the option holders elected the “cash-out” offer. Simultaneous with the close of the transaction with Applied on December 14, 2004, unvested options exercisable into approximately 1,332,000 shares were vested. As this is considered a stock option modification under FIN No. 44, the Company recorded an expense of approximately $2,523,000 based on the difference between the minimum expected liquidation distribution per share and the option exercise price. Payments are being made either directly to the entitled option holders or to Applied for distribution to the entitled option holders through Applied’s

4payroll system. ~~CONVERTIBLE~~ When ~~DEBENTURES~~ the Company makes the Final Distribution to its shareholders, it will, at the same time, make the final cash-out payments to the option holders.

~~Convertible~~3. ACQUISITION OF ~~debentures~~NORTEM atN.V. ~~November 30,~~BY ~~2004 were as follows:~~ APPLIED

		8% Debentures		6.5% Debentures		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Debentures principal		$	7,000	$	6,000	$	13,000
Less: Interest discount included in shareholders' equity:
	Fair value of warrants		2,348		1,162		3,510
	Deemed dividend		3,364		—		3,364
			1,288		4,838		6,126
	Interest accretion		586		75		661
	Balances, November 30, 2004	$	1,874	$	4,913	$	6,787
	Balances, May 31, 2004	$	1,531	$	—	$	1,531

On December 10, 2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the Purchase Agreement with Applied and completed the transaction on December 14, 2004. Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold to Applied the outstanding shares of its worldwide operating subsidiaries and substantially all of the other assets of the Company, including, but not limited to, the Company’s intellectual property and technology and all cash and cash equivalents other than an amount equal to approximately $2.0 million plus cash received prior to closing upon exercise of warrants and options. Under the Purchase Agreement, Applied (a) paid the Company the sum of $84.6 million; (b) assumed certain of the Company’s liabilities; (c) will pay the Company amounts related to certain Netherlands surtax liabilities and withholding obligations; and (d) will reimburse the Company for up to $2.75 million of certain costs after the close of the transaction. The Company’s shareholders will not receive any payments directly from Applied.

InWith ~~December 2004,~~ the ~~Company~~close ~~sold substantially all~~ of ~~its~~the ~~subsidiaries~~transaction, ~~and~~the ~~assets to Applied and commenced liquidation (See note 1). The~~ Company’s ~~expects~~recorded toa ~~record additional~~gain ~~interest~~on ~~expense for $6.2 million that represents~~ the ~~write-off~~sale of substantially ~~the~~all ~~remaining~~of ~~unamortized~~its ~~debt~~assets ~~discount~~ to ~~record~~Applied, accelerated the ~~principal~~interest ~~amount~~on of its convertible debentures ~~of $13.0 million~~and ~~with~~wrote ~~the~~off ~~closing of~~ the ~~Applied~~related ~~transaction~~unamortized inplacement ~~the~~agent fees ~~third~~– ~~quarter~~See ofNote ~~fiscal 2005~~5. The ~~Additionally,~~gain on the ~~Company~~sale of ~~expects~~its assets to ~~write-off~~Applied ~~$0.5 million~~consisted asof ~~interest expense for~~ the ~~unamortized placement agent fees that remained at November 30, 2004.~~ following:

The convertible debentures and warrants remain as obligations of the Company. As a result of the transaction with Applied, the holders of the convertible debentures will have the right either to convert the debentures into common shares and participate in the liquidating distribution or to receive a cash payment equal to 120% of the principal of $13.0 million or $15.6 million if all holders choose this option. The holders of warrants may exercise the warrants and receive the same liquidating distribution.

	(Dollars in thousands)

Cash received from Applied	$	84,567
Net assets of Nortem N.V. acquired by Applied at December 14, 2004	47,999
Gain on sale of subsidiaries and certain assets to Applied (exclusive of impact of required redemption of convertible debentures)	$	36,568

InThe ~~June 2004,~~sale ~~the Company issued $6.0 million principal amount~~ of ~~convertible~~subsidiaries ~~debentures~~and ~~for~~certain ~~$5.6 million~~assets ofto ~~proceeds,~~Applied constituted ~~net~~a ofChange ~~$0.4 million~~ of ~~issuance~~Control ~~costs,~~Transaction as ~~with~~defined anin ~~annual~~the ~~interest~~two ~~rate~~convertible ofdebenture 6agreements.~~5%,~~ As ~~payable~~described ~~quarterly~~in ~~beginning~~the ~~September 1~~debenture agreements, ~~2004.~~a Change ~~The~~of ~~6.5%~~Control ~~convertible~~Transaction ~~debentures~~triggers ~~are~~both ~~convertible~~an ~~into approximately~~acceleration ~~1,667,000 common shares~~ of the ~~Company~~principal amounts atunder ~~any time after~~ the ~~closing~~convertible ~~date~~debenture ~~based~~agreements onand athe ~~per-share~~redemption ~~price equal to $3.60. The closing per share price~~ of the ~~transaction was equal~~ toconvertible ~~the~~debentures ~~volume-weighted average of the closing price~~ for the ~~common~~full ~~shares~~principal amount of the ~~Company~~convertible asdebentures, ~~listed~~together onwith interest ~~NASDAQ for ten days prior to~~ and ~~including~~other ~~May 21,~~amounts ~~2004~~due. The ~~quarterly~~impact ~~interest~~of ~~is payable~~this atacceleration ~~the~~and ~~Company's~~redemption ~~option~~are ~~with~~reflected ~~either~~in ~~cash~~the ~~or,~~Statement ~~subject~~of toChanges ~~certain~~in ~~conditions,~~Net Assets ~~registered~~in ~~common~~Liquidation ~~shares~~for of the ~~Company.~~period ~~The Company~~December 15, at2004 ~~its~~to ~~option~~February 28, 2005. Refer ~~can require the holders~~ to ~~convert~~Note ~~the 6.~~5% ~~convertible debentures into common shares of the Company in the event the volume-weighted average of the closing price~~ for ~~the common shares of the Company for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeds $11.00,~~further ~~subject to certain conditions~~information.

The Company issued the purchasers of the 6.5% convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 767,000 common shares of the Company. One-half of the warrants are exercisable at $3.79 per share, with the remaining warrants being exercisable at $3.92 per share. All warrants are exercisable for a five-year period after June 2004. Additionally, the Company paid a fee of $0.4 million to the placement agent.

The 6.5% convertible debentures and warrants were recorded at their relative fair values in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 21 Interest on Receivables and Payables. The relative fair value allocated to the debt was determined to be approximately $4.8 million. The relative fair value assigned to the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model, and

~~approximately $1.2 million~~The ~~was~~pro ~~recorded~~forma asnet aassets ~~discount~~ of the ~~debt~~Company ~~and~~at asDecember 14, 2004 anafter ~~increase~~the inclosing ~~shareholders'~~of ~~equity.~~the ~~The~~transaction ~~debt~~with ~~discount~~Applied, ~~attributable~~but prior to the ~~warrants is being accreted as additional~~start ~~non-cash~~of ~~interest~~liquidation, ~~expense~~consisted ~~over the life~~ of the ~~debt~~following ~~using the effective interest method.~~ estimates:

In August 2003, the Company issued convertible debentures with a $7.0 million face value (resulting in $6.7 million of proceeds, net of issuance costs) with an annual interest rate of 8% ("8% convertible debentures"), payable quarterly beginning December 1, 2003. The issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures required certain anti-dilution adjustments for both the conversion price per share and warrants price per share for the 8% convertible debentures. As a result of the issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures, the 8% convertible debentures are convertible into approximately 1,944,000 common shares of the Company based on a per share price equal to $3.60 (previously $3.79). The quarterly interest is payable at the Company's option with either cash or, subject to certain conditions, registered common shares of the Company. The Company, at its option, can require the holders to convert the 8% convertible debentures into common shares of the Company in the event the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeds $10.34, subject to certain conditions. After February 25, 2007, the remaining balance of the 8% convertible debentures not converted into common shares must be repaid to the holders in cash, including any accrued interest.

	Condensed Consolidated Net Assets Prior to Sale to Applied		Reclassifications (e)			Reclassified Balance Sheet at December 14, 2004		Net Assets Acquired by Applied			Adjustment			Pro Forma Net Assets Prior to Liquidation

Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,188	$	(7,161	)	$	2,027	$	—		$	84,567	(a)	$	86,594
Loan to officer/shareholder	110		—			110		—			—			110
All other current assets	83,351		(83,351		)	—		—			—			—
Assets held for sale to Applied	—		116,318			116,318		(116,318		)	—			—
Total current assets	92,649		25,806			118,455		(116,318		)	84,567			86,704
Property, plant and equipment, net	18,722		(18,722		)	—		—			—			—
Intangibles and other assets, net	7,580		(7,084		)	496		—			(496		)(b)	—
Total assets	$	118,951	$	—		$	118,951	$	(116,318	)	$	84,071		$	86,704

Accrued transaction costs for sale of assets to Applied	2,414		—			2,414		—			—			2,414
All other Current liabilities	56,388		(56,225		)	163		—			—			163
Liabilities held for sale to Applied	—		68,319			68,319		(68,319		)	—			—
Convertible debentures	—		—			—		—			13,000		(c), (d)	13,000
Total current liabilities	58,802		12,094			70,896		(68,319		)	13,000			15,577

Long-term debt, excluding current portion	5,916		(5,916		)	—		—			—			—
Convertible debentures	6,832		—			6,832		—			(6,832		)(d)	—

Other long-term liabilities	6,178		(6,178		)	—		—			—			—
Total liabilities	77,728		—			77,728		(68,319		)	6,168			15,577
Net Assets	$	41,223	$	—		$	41,223	$	(47,999	)	$	77,903		$	71,127

The Company issued the purchasers and the placement agent of the 8% convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 867,000 common shares of the Company. One-half of the warrants are exercisable at $3.79 per share (~~previously $3.97 per share~~a)~~, with the remaining warrants being exercisable at $4.09 per share (previously $4.31 per share). All~~ Cash ~~warrants~~received ~~are~~from exercisable for a four-year period after August 2003. The debt issuance cost associated with the 8% convertible debentures was approximately $0.4 million. Approximately $0.2 million of this cost pertains to the allocation of the fair value of the warrants issued to the placement agent, and was an offset in shareholders' equity. Additionally, a fee of approximately $0.3 million was paid to the placement agent. Applied

The 8% convertible debentures and warrants were recorded at their relative fair values. The fair value of the debt was determined to be $4.7 million. The fair value assigned to the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model and approximately $2.3 million was recorded as a discount of the debt and as an increase in shareholders' equity. In addition, in accordance with EITF 00(b) Write-~~27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, and EITF 98-5 Accounting for Convertible~~off ~~Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios, the Company recorded a deemed dividend because the conversion price~~ of ~~the~~unamortized 8%placement ~~convertible~~agent ~~debentures,~~fees ~~after taking~~– ~~into~~See ~~account~~Note the fair value of the warrants, was less than the closing price of the Company's common shares, which was $4.34 per share on the closing date. The deemed dividend of approximately $3.4 million was recorded as a further discount to the 8% convertible debentures and an increase to shareholders' equity. The deemed dividend and debt discount attributable to the warrants is being accreted as additional non-cash interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. 5

(c) Acceleration of interest on convertible debentures to record the debentures at the principal amount due to debenture holders and reclassification of all amounts as a current liability

(d) Reclassification of the principal amount of the convertible debentures to a current liability.

(e) Reclassifications from the balance sheet historical line items to Assets and Liabilities held for sale, respectively.

Following the closing of the transaction with Applied and the satisfaction of the Company’s liabilities, including the settlement of convertible debentures and the related warrants, the Company made an initial liquidating distribution of $3.75 per share on March 11, 2005 to shareholders of record as of March 4, 2005. On March 11, 2005, the Company paid approximately $48.3 million to Computershare Trust Company, Inc., as payment agent, for the initial distribution to the Company’s shareholders of record. After the initial liquidating distribution, Nortem retained a reserve of approximately $17.5 million for liquidation expenses, Dutch corporate taxes and for any unforeseen liabilities. At the conclusion of the liquidation process, which the Company expects will be completed by June 2005, any cash of the Company remaining after the satisfaction of its liabilities will be distributed to its shareholders. The Company estimates that the final liquidating distribution will be in the range of approximately $1.01 to $1.09 per share, prior to the effect of Dutch tax withholding requirements that apply differently to each shareholder. This range considers stock options and the settlement of convertible debentures and the related warrants with the debenture holders as described in Note 5.

The amount and timing of the final distribution is dependent upon a variety of factors, including the timing and costs of winding up the Company’s business and dissolving and other factors. In the event that the Company’s liabilities

~~5. RESTRUCTURING~~exceed ~~COSTS~~ current estimates or unanticipated issues arise in connection with the satisfaction of the Company’s liabilities, the liquidating distribution to the Company’s shareholders will be less than currently estimated and may be made later than currently anticipated.

~~The following table summarizes the restructuring costs and remaining accrued liability for restructuring costs~~4. LIQUIDATION LIABILITIES

			Personnel Costs (Cash)			Abandoned Lease Facilities (Cash)			Fixed Assets (non-cash)			Total
			(Dollars in thousands)
Restructuring costs
	Balances, August 31, 2004		$	249		$	842		$	—		$	1,091
	Amounts accrued			873			(25	)		12			860
	Non-cash reductions			—			—			(12	)		(12	)
	Amounts paid			(825	)		(328	)		—			(1,153	)
		Balances, November 30, 2004	$	297		$	489		$	—		$	786
	Balances, August 31, 2003		$	805		$	1,866		$	26		$	2,697
	Amounts accrued			802			589			19			1,410
	Non-cash reductions			—			—			(45	)		(45	)
	Amounts paid			(715	)		(381	)		—			(1,096	)
		Balances, November 30, 2003	$	892		$	2,074		$	—		$	2,966
	Balances, May 31, 2004		$	545		$	1,278		$	—		$	1,823
	Amounts accrued			1,354			(75	)		24			1,303
	Non-cash reductions			—			—			(24	)		(24	)
	Amounts paid			(1,602	)		(714	)		—			(2,316	)
		Balances, November 30, 2004	$	297(1	)	$	489 (2	)	$	—		$	786
	Balances, May 31, 2003		$	607		$	2,098		$	—		$	2,705
	Amounts accrued			1,310			753			469			2,532
	Non-cash reductions			—			—			(469	)		(469	)
	Amounts paid			(1,025	)		(777	)		—			(1,802	)
		Balances, November 30, 2003	$	892		$	2,074		$	—		$	2,966

Liquidation liabilities include estimates of all liabilities expected to be paid during the liquidation and dissolving period, subsequent to the close of the sale to Applied. Applied will reimburse the Company for up to $2.75 million of certain liquidation costs. Expected but unpaid liquidation liabilities have been accrued. Liquidation liabilities at February 28, 2005 were as follows:

During the initial six-month period of fiscal 2005, the Company terminated 13 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 5 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 2 employees, and 6 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. Of the $1.3 million of personnel costs accrued during the initial six-month period of fiscal 2005, approximately $0.8 million pertained to personnel terminated during fiscal year 2004. Remaining accrued personnel costs as of November 30, 2004 will be paid during fiscal 2005. The Company incurred approximately $0.6 million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment primarily for personnel terminations. The fab solutions group incurred approximately $0.3 million of restructuring costs for personnel terminations, while finance and administration incurred approximately $0.4 million. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities, the Company made assumptions regarding the future sublease income of these facilities. These assumptions will be updated periodically and additional adjustments may be required.

	Total Estimated Liquidation Liabilities		Amounts Paid by Nortem N.V.		Liquidation Liabilities
	(Dollars in thousands)
Insurance including director and officer insurance	$	891	$	833	$	58
Legal fees	693		222		471
Completion fee	425		425		—
Accounting fees	200		23		177
Liquidators fee	220		90		130
Supervisory director fees	46		10		36
Other	135		37		98
	$	2,610	$	1,640	$	970

At February 28, 2005, due from Applied for reimbursement of liquidation costs were approximately $1.8 million of which $0.2 million of expenses had been incurred but not yet paid by the Company.

During the initial six-month period of fiscal 2004, the Company terminated 46 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 21 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 21 employees and 4 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. The Company incurred approximately $1.5 ~~million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment, of which $0~~.~~7 million was for personnel terminations and $0.8 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities, leasehold improvements and fixed~~ CONVERTIBLE assets. The fab solutions group incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring costs, of which $0.3 million was for personnel terminations and $0.4 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities, leasehold improvements and fixed assets. Other groups incurred approximately $0.3 million of restructuring costs, which primarily pertained to personnel terminations. DEBENTURES

~~6. SEGMENT~~Convertible ~~AND~~debentures ~~GEOGRAPHIC~~at ~~DATA~~ February 28, 2005 are stated at fair value, and were as follows:

The Company operates in the semiconductor industry. The Company provides marketing, sales, service and support solutions to semiconductor materials and equipment suppliers and semiconductor manufacturers. Reportable segments are based on the way the Company is organized, reporting responsibilities to the chief executive officer and on the nature of the products offered to customers. Reportable segments are the equipment solutions group, which includes certain specialized process chemicals, spare part sales, and equipment; the fab solutions group, which includes components used in construction and maintenance, parts cleaning service and other, which includes finance, administration and corporate functions.

	8% Debentures		6.5% Debentures		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Debentures principal	$	7,000	$	6,000	$	13,000
Less: Discount included in shareholders’ equity:
Fair value of warrants	2,348		1,162		3,510
Deemed dividend	3,364		—		3,364
	1,288		4,838		6,126
Interest accretion	624		82		706
Acceleration of discount amortization	5,088		1,080		6,168
Total convertible debentures	7,000		6,000		13,000
Cash-out settlement to record liability at fair value
Convertible debentures	2,042		1,750		3,792
Warrants, net	615		610		1,225
	2,657		2,360		5,017
Balances, February 28, 2005	$	9,657	$	8,360	$	18,017

Balances, May 31, 2004	$	1,531	$	—	$	1,531

~~Segment~~In December 2004, the Company sold substantially ~~operating~~all ~~results~~of ~~are~~its ~~measured~~subsidiaries ~~based~~and onassets ~~income~~to Applied and commenced liquidation (~~loss~~See Note 1). ~~before~~The ~~tax~~convertible debentures and warrants remained obligations of the Company. Section 3 of both convertible debenture agreements require that upon a Change of Control Transaction, ~~adjusted~~such ifas ~~necessary~~the transaction with Applied, ~~for~~both ~~certain~~an ~~segment~~acceleration ~~specific~~of ~~items.~~the principal ~~There~~amounts ~~are~~under nothe ~~inter-segment~~convertible ~~sales.~~debenture ~~Identifiable~~agreements ~~assets are~~and the ~~Company's~~redemption of ~~assets~~the ~~that~~convertible ~~are~~debentures ~~identified~~for ~~with~~the full ~~classes~~principal amount of ~~similar~~the ~~products~~convertible ordebentures, ~~operations~~together inwith ~~each~~interest ~~geographic~~and other ~~region~~amounts accrued must occur. As ~~Corporate~~a ~~assets~~result, ~~include~~immediately ~~primarily~~subsequent ~~cash~~to the closing of the transaction with Applied, ~~short~~the ~~and~~Company ~~long~~recorded ~~term~~additional ~~investments~~interest ~~and~~expense for $6.2 million ~~assets~~that ~~related~~represents the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt discount to record the ~~administrative~~convertible ~~headquarters~~debentures at their principal amount of $13.0 million. Additionally, the Company wrote-off $0.5 million as interest expense for the unamortized placement agent fees that remained at December 14, 2004.

During the Company’s third quarter of fiscal 2005, certain debenture holders advanced approximately $5.6 million in cash to the Company in anticipation of exercising their warrants to purchase common stock. On February 11, 2005, the Company offered all convertible debenture holders, including those debenture holders who remitted funds in anticipation of exercising their warrants, a cash payment upon surrender of their debentures and/or warrants equal to $4.65 per common share equivalent that would have been issuable under the debenture and warrant agreement absent the transaction with Applied, reduced by the amount of the aggregate price payable with respect to the warrants. On March 7, 2005, all convertible debenture holders accepted the Company’s offer, and surrendered their debentures and/or warrants, which were then cancelled. In March 2005, the Company returned to convertible debenture holders their advance of $5.6 million, and paid approximately $18.0 million to settle the cash-out offer. The amounts noted as “cash out settlement to record liability at fair value” in the above table represent the true-up amount required to record the debentures at the $18.0 million settlement amount.

In June 2004, the Company issued $6.0 million principal amount of convertible debentures for $5.6 million of proceeds, net of $0.4 million of issuance costs, with an annual interest rate of 6.5%, payable quarterly beginning September 1, 2004. Before the convertible debentures were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), the 6.5% convertible debentures were convertible into approximately 1,667,000 common shares of the Company at any time after the closing date based on a per-share price equal to $3.60. The closing per share price of the transaction was equal to the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company as listed on NASDAQ for ten days

~~Segment~~prior ~~information~~ to and including May 21, 2004. Before the convertible debentures were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), the quarterly interest was payable at the Company’s option with either cash or, subject to certain conditions, registered common shares of the Company, and the Company, at its option, could have required the holders to convert the 6.5% convertible debentures into common shares of the Company in the event the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeded $11.00, subject to certain conditions.

		Equipment Solutions Group			Fab Solutions Group			Other			Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Quarter ended November 30, 2003
	Net revenues	$	12,679		$	31,343		$	—		$	44,022
	Depreciation and amortization expense		433			426			775			1,634
	Interest income		—			—			16			16
	Interest expense		—			—			(520	)		(520	)
	Restructuring costs		(682	)		(692	)		(36	)		(1,410	)
	Income (loss) before income taxes		(2,402	)		764			(5,452	)		(7,090	)
	Capital expenditures		352			251			229			832
Quarter ended November 30, 2004
	Net revenues	$	14,906		$	36,162		$	—		$	51,068
	Depreciation and amortization expense		754			271			646			1,671
	Interest income		—			—			35			35
	Interest expense		—			—			(907	)		(907	)
	Restructuring costs		(402	)		(71	)		(387	)		(860	)
	Income (loss) before income taxes		170			(382	)		(5,784	)		(5,996	)
	Capital expenditures		261			79			41			381
Six months ended November 30, 2003
	Net revenues	$	28,035		$	62,925		$	—		$	90,960
	Depreciation and amortization expense		689			510			1,643			2,842
	Interest income		—			—			23			23
	Interest expense		—			—			(753	)		(753	)
	Restructuring costs		(1,540	)		(716	)		(276	)		(2,532	)
	Income (loss) before income taxes		(3,455	)		1,894			(10,618	)		(12,179	)
	Capital expenditures		554			282			364			1,200
Six months ended November 30, 2004
	Net revenue	$	37,170		$	76,624		$	—		$	113,794
	Depreciation and amortization expense		1,422			516			1,344			3,282
	Interest income		—			—			63			63
	Interest expense		—			—			(1,737	)		(1,737	)
	Restructuring costs		(568	)		(328	)		(407	)		(1,303	)
	Income (loss) before income taxes		1,385			1,276			(8,768	)		(6,107	)
	Capital expenditures		512			328			123			963
	Total assets at November 30,2004		51,490			48,507			24,266			124,263
	Total assets at May 31, 2004		61,818			58,548		$	25,147			145,513

The Company issued the purchasers of the 6.5% convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 767,000 common shares of the Company. Before the warrants were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), one-half of the warrants are exercisable at $3.79 per share, with the remaining warrants exercisable at $3.92 per share and all warrants were exercisable for a five-year period after June 2004. Additionally, the Company paid a fee of $0.4 million to the placement agent.

The 6.5% convertible debentures and warrants were recorded at their relative fair values in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 21 Interest on Receivables and Payables. The relative fair value allocated to the debt was determined to be approximately $4.8 million. The relative fair value assigned to the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model, and approximately $1.2 million was recorded as a discount of the debt and as an increase in shareholders’ equity. Before the warrants were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), the debt discount attributable to the warrants was being accreted as additional non-cash interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

In August 2003, the Company issued convertible debentures with a $7.0 million face value (resulting in $6.7 million of proceeds, net of issuance costs) with an annual interest rate of 8% (“8% convertible debentures”), payable quarterly beginning December 1, 2003. The issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures required certain anti-dilution adjustments for both the conversion price per share and warrants price per share for the 8% convertible debentures. Before the convertible debentures were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), the as a result of the issuance of the 6.5% convertible debentures, the 8% convertible debentures were convertible into approximately 1,944,000 common shares of the Company based on a per share price equal to $3.60 (previously $3.79), and the quarterly interest was payable at the Company’s option with either cash or, subject to certain conditions, registered common shares of the Company. Prior to the cancellation of the convertible debentures in March 2005 (as described above), the Company, at its option, could have required the holders to convert the 8% convertible debentures into common shares of the Company in the event the volume-weighted average of the closing price for the common shares of the Company for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeded $10.34, subject to certain conditions, and after February 25, 2007, the remaining balance of the 8% convertible debentures not converted into common shares would have had to have been repaid to the holders in cash, including any accrued interest.

The Company issued the purchasers and the placement agent of the 8% convertible debentures warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 867,000 common shares of the Company. Before the warrants were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), one-half of the warrants were exercisable at $3.79 per share (previously $3.97 per share), with the remaining warrants exercisable at $4.09 per share (previously $4.31 per share), and all warrants are exercisable for a four-year period after August 2003. The debt issuance cost associated with the 8% convertible debentures was approximately $0.4 million. Approximately $0.2 million of this cost pertains to the allocation of the fair value of the warrants issued to the placement agent, and was an offset in shareholders’ equity. Additionally, a fee of approximately $0.3 million was paid to the placement agent

The 8% convertible debentures and warrants were recorded at their relative fair values. The fair value of the debt was determined to be $4.7 million. The fair value assigned to the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes option pricing model and approximately $2.3 million was recorded as a discount of the debt and as an increase in shareholders’ equity. In addition, in accordance with EITF 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, and EITF 98-5 Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios, the Company recorded a deemed dividend because the conversion price of the 8% convertible debentures, after taking into account the fair value of the warrants, was less than the closing price of the Company’s common shares, which was $4.34 per share on the closing date. The deemed dividend of approximately $3.4 million was recorded as a further discount to the 8% convertible debentures and an increase to shareholders’ equity. Before the warrants were surrendered and cancelled in March 2005 (as described above), the deemed dividend and debt discount

attributable ~~Geographic~~to ~~information~~ the warrants was accreted as additional non-cash interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

		Three months ended November 30,				Six months ended November 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003
		(Dollars in thousands)
Net revenue:
	United States	$	15,716	$	14,931	$	37,620	$	29,837
	Singapore		7,881		4,606		18,650		9,559
	Israel		4,894		3,889		12,235		7,629
	Germany		4,208		4,455		10,346		11,412
	Korea		3,136		1,194		6,071		2,269
	Taiwan		2,369		2,538		4,955		3,869
	Japan		2,269		1,434		3,363		1,434
	The Netherlands		2,260		2,435		4,147		4,504
	United Kingdom		2,128		3,617		4,543		6,697
	France		1,927		2,054		3,359		6,575
	Other nations		4,280		2,869		8,505		7,175
	Geographic totals	$	51,068	$	44,022	$	113,794	$	90,960

6. RESTRUCTURING COSTS

		November 30, 2004		May 31, 2004
		(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed assets:
	The Netherlands	$	3,486	$	9,809
	United Kingdom		5,195		3,959
	United States		2,101		2,370
	Singapore		2,987		1,911
	Germany		1,723		634
	Other nations		3,397		1,352
Geographic totals		$	18,889	$	20,035
Intangible assets, net; United States		$	4,600	$	5,200

During the six-month and 14 day period ending December 14, 2004, the Company terminated 15 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 7 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 2 employees, and 6 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. Of the $1.4 million of personnel costs accrued during the initial six-month and 14 day period of fiscal 2005, approximately $0.8 million pertained to personnel terminated during fiscal year 2004. Remaining accrued personnel costs as of December 14, 2004 were assumed by Applied. The Company incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment primarily for personnel terminations. The fab solutions group incurred approximately $0.3 million of restructuring costs for personnel terminations, while finance and administration incurred approximately $0.4 million. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities, the Company made assumptions regarding the future sublease income of these facilities.

7For the nine-month period ended February 29, 2004, the Company terminated 73 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 35 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 28 employees and 10 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. ~~RECENT~~ ~~ACCOUNTING~~Remaining ~~PRONOUNCEMENTS~~ accrued personnel costs as of February 29, 2004 were paid by May 2004. The Company incurred approximately $1.9 million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment, of which $1.1 million was for personnel terminations and $0.8 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities, leasehold improvements and fixed assets. The fab solutions group incurred approximately $0.8 million of restructuring costs, of which $0.3 million was for personnel terminations and $0.5 million pertained to the abandonment of leased facilities. Other groups incurred approximately $0.6 million of restructuring costs, of which $0.5 million was for personnel terminations and $0.1 million pertained to the abandonment of leased facilities. In estimating the accrual for abandoned leased facilities, the Company made assumptions regarding the future sublease income of these facilities. .

~~During January 2003, the Financial Accountings Standards Board issued Interpretation No~~7. ~~46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Equities" ("FIN~~ COMMITMENTS ~~46").~~AND FIN 46 requires that if an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46(R) was issued in December 2003. The Company adopted FIN 46(R) in January 2004. The Company has evaluated its investments in variable interest entities, and has determined that the adoption of FIN 46(R) did not have a material impact on its operating results of financial condition. CONTINGENCIES

~~On December 17,~~No ~~2003,~~claims ~~the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC~~ or ~~the~~actions ~~Staff) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition" ("SAB 104"),~~have ~~which~~been ~~supercedes~~filed ~~Staff~~against ~~Accounting~~the ~~Bulletin~~Company ~~No. 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" ("SAB 101"). SAB 104 rescinds accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, superceded~~ as ~~a result~~ of the ~~issuance~~filing of ~~Emerging~~this ~~Issues Task Force Issue No. 00~~10-~~21 ("EITF 00-21"), "Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables~~Q.~~" Additionally, SAB 104 rescinds~~

16ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~the~~The information in this ~~SEC'~~Management’s ~~Revenue~~Discussion ~~Recognition~~and inAnalysis of Financial ~~Statements~~Condition ~~Frequently~~and ~~Asked~~Results ~~Questions~~of Operations, ~~and~~except ~~Answers~~for (the ~~FAQ)~~historical ~~issued~~information, ~~with~~contains ~~SAB~~forward-looking statements. ~~101~~These ~~that~~statements ~~had~~involve ~~been~~known ~~codified~~and inunknown ~~SEC~~risks, ~~topic~~uncertainties 13and other factors that may cause our, ~~"Revenue~~or ~~Recognition."~~our ~~While~~industry’s, ~~the wording~~actual ofresults, ~~SAB~~levels ~~104~~of activity, ~~has~~performance ~~changed~~or achievements to ~~reflect~~be ~~the~~materially ~~issuance~~different from any future results, levels of ~~EITF~~activity, 00performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-21looking statements, including the ~~revenue~~factors ~~recognition~~described under ~~principles~~Part II, ofItem ~~SAB~~5—Other ~~101~~Information—Risk ~~remain~~Factors ~~largely~~and ~~unchanged~~elsewhere byin this Report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as actual results could differ materially. We do not assume any obligation to publicly release the ~~issuance~~results of ~~SAB~~any ~~104~~revision or updates to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or unanticipated occurrences. ~~The~~This ~~adoption~~discussion ofand ~~SAB~~analysis should be read in conjunction with ~~104~~our ~~did~~Consolidated ~~not~~Financial ~~have~~Statements aand ~~material~~the ~~effect~~related Notes, which are included on ~~its~~our ~~financial~~Annual ~~condition~~Report oron ~~results~~Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004, filed with the SEC. This discussion of ~~operations~~the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004 refers to the ~~Company.~~fiscal quarters that ended on February 28, 2005 and 2004.

In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF Issue No. 03-6, "Participating Securities and the Two-class Method Under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share." EITF Issue No. 03-6 addresses a number of questions regarding the computation of earnings per share ("EPS") by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company when, and if, it declares dividends on its common stock. The issue also provides further guidance in applying the two-class method of calculating EPS. It clarifies what constitutes a participating security and how to apply the two-class method of computing EPS once it is determined that a security is participating, including how to allocate undistributed earnings to such a security. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after March 31, 2004. The adoption of EITF 03-6 did not have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

During September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue No. 04-8 "Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of Contingently Convertible Debt and the Effect on Diluted Earnings per Share". The pronouncement pertains to all issued securities that have embedded market price contingent conversion features and therefore, applies to contingently convertible debt, contingently convertible preferred stock, and Instrument C in EITF 90-19, Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash upon Conversion. The EITF addresses when the dilutive effect of these securities with a market price trigger should be included in diluted earnings per share ("EPS"). The pronouncement is effective for all periods ending after December 15, 2004 and would be applied by retroactively restating previously reported EPS. The Company is evaluating the provisions of EITF 04-8 to determine the impact, if any, on its computation of EPS.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The information in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, except for the historical information, contains forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our, or our industry's, actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including the factors described under Part II, Item 5—Other Information—Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as actual results could differ materially. We do not assume any obligation to publicly release the results of any revision or updates to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or unanticipated occurrences. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes, which are included on our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004, filed with the SEC. This discussion of the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004 refers to the fiscal quarters that ended on November 30, 2004 and 2003.

Overview

On December 10, 2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement ("“Purchase Agreement"”), dated August 16, 2004, with Applied. Concurrently with the close of the transaction on December 14, 2004, the Company changed its name tofrom ~~Nortem~~Metron Technology N.V., ~~filed~~to ~~for~~Nortem ~~liquidation in the Netherlands~~N.V., the Managing Board of ~~Directors~~ ~~resigned, and the liquidators approved by the Company's shareholders, assumed the management responsibilities of the Company.~~ Directors

~~Due to~~resigned and the liquidators ~~consummation~~approved ofby the ~~transaction~~shareholders ~~with~~assumed ~~Applied,~~control weof nothe ~~longer~~Company ~~have~~to begin ~~continuing~~the ~~operations~~liquidation process. On December 16, 2004, ~~and~~we ~~have~~filed noour ~~sources~~liquidation ~~for~~in ~~revenue~~The Netherlands. On WeMarch 11, ~~believe~~2005, ~~that~~ we ~~have~~made ~~sufficient~~our ~~liquidity~~initial distribution to ~~handle current~~our ~~commitments~~shareholders, ~~and~~in wethe doamount ~~not~~of ~~expect~~$3.75 toper ~~need~~share. On ~~further~~March 24, ~~financing~~2005, orwe ~~borrowing~~filed ~~facilities.~~our liquidation Weaccounts ~~are~~and inplan ~~the~~of ~~process~~distribution offor ~~winding~~public ~~down~~inspection with the Dutch ~~business~~Commercial ~~and~~Registry ~~liquidating~~in ~~our~~Arnhem, ~~assets.~~The Netherlands.

~~Nortem N.V.~~Under ~~was~~the aPurchase ~~holding~~Agreement, ~~company~~the ~~organized~~Company ~~under~~sold to Applied the ~~laws~~outstanding shares of ~~The~~its ~~Netherlands.~~worldwide ~~Through our various~~ operating subsidiaries, weand substantially ~~were~~all aof ~~global~~the ~~provider~~other assets of ~~marketing~~the Company, ~~sales~~including, ~~service~~but not limited to, our intellectual property and technology and all cash and cash ~~support~~equivalents ~~solutions~~other than an amount equal to ~~semiconductor~~$2.0 ~~materials~~million plus cash received prior to closing upon exercise of warrants and ~~equipment~~options. ~~suppliers~~Under the Purchase Agreement, Applied (a) paid the Company the sum of $84.6 million; (b) assumed certain of the Company’s liabilities; (c) agreed to pay the Company amounts related to certain Netherlands surtax liabilities and ~~semiconductor~~withholding obligations; ~~manufacturers~~and (d) agreed to reimburse the Company for up to $2.75 million Weof ~~operated~~certain incosts ~~all~~incurred ~~areas~~after the close of the ~~world~~transaction. The ~~where~~Company’s ~~there~~shareholders ~~was~~will anot ~~significant~~receive any ~~semiconductor~~payments ~~industry~~directly from Applied. The Company recorded a gain of ~~following~~approximately $36.6 million from the sale of the subsidiaries and substantially all of its assets to Applied.

18With the consummation of the transaction with Applied, we no longer have continuing operations, and have no sources of revenue. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to wind down the affairs and dissolve the Company according the Company’s liquidation plan. We do not expect to incur financing or borrowing facilities. The Company entered liquidation on December 15, 2004 and is in the process of winding down the business and liquidating assets. Consequently, the following discussion for the results of operations is for the six months and fourteen day period ended December 14, 2004.

~~tables show~~Nortem ~~our~~N.V., ~~sales~~prior into ~~Europe~~the transaction with Applied, ~~Asia~~was ~~and~~a holding company organized under the ~~United~~laws ~~States~~of inThe Netherlands. ~~dollars~~Through ~~and~~our asvarious operating subsidiaries, we were a ~~percentage~~global provider of ~~net~~marketing, ~~revenue~~sales, ~~for~~service ~~each~~and support solutions to semiconductor materials and equipment suppliers and semiconductor manufacturers. We operated in all areas of the ~~fiscal~~world ~~periods~~where ~~ended~~there ~~November 30,~~was ~~2004~~a ~~and~~significant ~~2003:~~semiconductor industry.

		Three months ended November 30,				Six months ended November 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003
		(in thousands)
Net revenue
Europe		$	18,127	$	18,719	$	39,809	$	42,500
Asia			17,225		10,372		36,365		18,623
United States			15,716		14,931		37,620		29,837
	Total net revenue	$	51,068	$	44,022	$	113,794	$	90,960

		Three months ended November 30,				Six months ended November 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003
		(percentage of net revenue)
Net revenue
Europe		35.5	%	42.5	%	35.0	%	46.7	%
Asia		33.7		23.6		32.0		20.5
United States		30.8		33.9		33.0		32.8
	Total net revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

We derived our revenue from sales of materials, equipment, service and spare parts to the semiconductor industry, as well as from commissions on sales of equipment and materials. For products from our suppliers, we generally recognized revenue upon the shipment of goods to customers. We deferred the portion of our equipment revenue associated with our installation. In certain circumstances, depending on the specific terms of the transaction, such as when the amount the customer retainage exceeded the deferred installation revenue, all or a portion of the residual equipment revenue was deferred. We recognized installation revenue, and any deferred equipment revenue, upon technical acceptance of the equipment by the customer. Revenue was deferred until we received technical acceptance for the sales of legacy equipment where we had no manufacturing history. We recognized service revenue in the periods the services were rendered to customers.

We were organized in two worldwide operating groups: equipment solutions and fab solutions. Equipment solutions were focused on two distinct areas of the semiconductor capital equipment market: advanced technology equipment and previous generation equipment. Over the last several years, under license from OEMs, we had begun to market, sell, manufacture and support previous generation semiconductor equipment. We referred to the previous generation equipment as the Legends Product Line. We provided the continued availability of service, spares and manufacturing capability for mature capital equipment.

To facilitate the transition to the Legends Product Line, we acquired previous generation product lines from OEMs. In March 2002, we purchased the AG Associates RTP product line from Mattson Technology. In September 2003, we acquired inventory and certain assets related to the Eclipse PVD equipment product line from TEL. The Company also operated as an authorized re-manufacturer of PVD equipment for a well-known supplier of automated systems for chemical vapor deposition (CVD).

Our fab solutions focused on the needs of the semiconductor fab and offered our customers a comprehensive portfolio to address the critical, non-core functions of the fab. Our fab solutions group derived the majority of its revenue from sales of materials and components. The remainder of the group'’s revenue came from parts cleaning services, other outsourcing services and commissions. The materials and components we sold were used both in the production of semiconductors and in the building and maintenance of semiconductor equipment and manufacturing facilities. Materials included products such as wafer surface preparation materials, fluid-handling components such as fittings, valves and

1917

materials and components we sold were used both in the production of semiconductors and in the building and maintenance of semiconductor equipment and manufacturing facilities. Materials included products such as wafer surface preparation materials, fluid-handling components such as fittings, valves and tubing and disposable cleanroom clothing. Sales of these products tended to be less cyclical than sales of semiconductor equipment and generally offer higher gross margins than externally sourced equipment.

During our first fiscal quarter of 2005, Pall Corporation notified the Company it would terminate its distribution agreement with the Company as of August 31, 2004. Revenue ~~from~~ from the sale of products manufactured by Pall Corporation for ~~our~~the ~~second~~six ~~quarters of fiscal 2005~~ month and ~~2004~~fourteen ~~was~~day ~~approximately~~period ~~$1.3 million~~ended ~~and $3.2~~December ~~million~~14, ~~respectively,~~2004 ~~while~~and ~~revenue for~~ the ~~six~~ nine-month ~~periods~~ period ended ~~November~~February 3029, 2004 ~~and 2003~~ was approximately $4.7 million and $610.7 3 million, respectively. Additionally, on August 30, 2004, Entegris notified the Company of its intent to terminate its existing distribution agreement with the Company effective August 31, 2005. Prior to the closing of the transaction with Applied, Entegris and the Company were in discussion regarding a new distribution agreement. Revenue from the sale of products manufactured by Entegris for ~~our~~the ~~second~~six ~~quarters~~month ~~of fiscal 2005~~ and ~~2004~~fourteen ~~was~~day ~~approximately $12.3 million~~period ~~and~~ended ~~$8.0~~December ~~million~~14, ~~respectively,~~2004 and ~~while revenue for~~ the ~~six~~nine-month ~~periods~~period ended ~~November~~February 3029, 2004 ~~and 2003~~ was approximately $2628.7 2 million and $1524.1 5 million, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those that require significant judgment and/or estimates by management at the time that the financial statements are prepared such that materially different results might have been reported if other assumptions had been made. We considered certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, valuation of accounts receivable and inventory, evaluation of long-lived assets and income taxes to be critical policies. The basis of our current estimates or assumptions has not changed since we filed our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC on August 12, 2004 and, in the past, there have not been significant adjustments to the actual results of our estimates.

~~Results~~Activities ofWhile ~~Operations~~ in Liquidation

The ~~following~~changes ~~table~~in ~~summarizes~~net ~~our~~assets ~~historical~~in ~~results~~liquidation for the period from December 15, 2004 to February 28, 2005 of approximately ~~operations~~$24.0 asmillion awas ~~percentage~~primarily due to the $36.6 million gain resulting from the sale of ~~net~~subsidiaries ~~revenue~~and ~~for~~certain assets ~~our~~to ~~second~~Applied ~~fiscal~~and ~~quarters~~interest income. This gain was offset by the acceleration of interest and ~~fiscal~~amortization of ~~year-~~the debt discount and placement agent fees for convertible debentures of $6.7 million, the adjustment to~~-date~~ ~~periods~~record the debt at its fair value based on the incremental cash settlement with the convertible debenture and warrant holders of ~~2005~~$5.0 million, and ~~2004~~the liquidation expenses, net of recoveries, of $1.2 million and interest income, net of interest expense of $0.3 million. Liquidation expenses consist primarily of costs incurred on the sale to Applied described in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

	Three months ended November 30,				Six months ended November 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
Net revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenue	77.9		79.3		78.1		79.4
Gross margin	22.1	%	20.7	%	21.9	%	20.6	%
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	25.4		30.0		22.0		28.7
Research, development and engineering	1.1		1.8		1.0		1.2
Closing cost of Applied transaction	4.7		—		2.1		—
Restructuring costs	1.7		3.2		1.2		2.8
Operating loss	(10.8	)%	(14.3	)%	(4.4	)%	(12.1	)%

The Company made an initial liquidating distribution of $3.75 per share on March 11, 2005 to shareholders of record as of March 4, 2005. On March 11, 2005 the Company paid approximately $48.3 million to Computershare Trust Company, Inc., as payment agent, for the initial distribution to the Company’s shareholders of record. After the initial liquidating distribution, Nortem retained a reserve of approximately $17.5 million for liquidation expenses, Dutch corporate taxes and for any unforeseen liabilities. At the conclusion of the liquidation process, which the Company expects will be completed by June 2005, any cash of the Company remaining after the satisfaction of its liabilities will be distributed to its shareholders. The Company estimates that the final liquidating distribution will be in the range of approximately $1.01 to $1.09 per share, prior to the effect of Dutch tax withholding requirements that apply differently to each shareholder.

~~Our quarterly~~We ~~operating~~expect ~~results~~to incur certain administrative, legal and other costs associated with winding up our affairs. These costs have ~~fluctuated~~been ~~significantly~~accrued ~~due~~(See Note 4, to athe ~~number~~condensed ofconsolidated ~~factors~~financial ~~including:~~statements included elsewhere in this report).

20Results of Operations - Six-months and Fourteen Days ended December 14, 2004

~~Three-months~~Net ~~ended November 30, 2004~~ Revenue

~~Net~~Equipment solutions ~~Revenue~~group. The equipment ~~following~~group ~~table~~net ~~shows~~revenue in our ~~net~~six-month ~~revenue~~ and ~~percent~~fourteen-day period of ~~net~~fiscal 2005 ~~revenue~~was ~~for~~$38.0 ~~our~~million, ~~equipment~~down ~~and~~$8.3 ~~fab~~million ~~solutions~~or ~~groups:~~17.9% from the first nine-month period of fiscal 2004. The decrease between the comparable nine-month periods reflects that there were only fourteen days of operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.

	Three Months Ended November 30,
	2004			2003
Net revenue (dollars in millions)
Equipment solutions group	$	14.9		$	12.7
Fab solutions group		36.2			31.3
Net revenue
Equipment solutions group		29.2	%		29.1	%
Fab solutions group		70.8			70.9

~~Equipment~~Fab solutions group. ~~The~~ In ~~equipment~~our ~~group~~six-month ~~net~~and ~~revenue~~fourteen-day inperiod ~~our~~of fiscal ~~second~~2005, ~~quarter~~the offab ~~fiscal~~solutions ~~2005~~group revenue was $1481.9 5 million, up down $215.2 9 million or 1716.3% from the ~~second~~group’s ~~quarter~~revenue the nine-month period of fiscal 2004. The ~~increase~~decrease between the comparable ~~quarters~~periods ~~primarily~~ reflects ~~the~~that ~~contribution~~there ofwere ~~our legacy product revenues for equipment.~~only ~~Spare~~fourteen ~~parts~~days ~~revenues~~of ~~were~~operations ~~flat for the comparable periods. Service and commission revenues decreased for the comparable quarters. Geographically, equipment revenues~~ in ~~Asia almost doubled while both Europe and~~ the ~~United~~third ~~States~~quarter ~~revenue~~of ~~declined.~~fiscal 2005.

~~Fab~~Gross solutions group. In our second quarter of fiscal 2005, the fab solutions group revenue was $36.2 million, up $4.9 million or 15.7% from the group's revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Increased revenues from parts cleaning units, material sales and our repair centers were offset by a slight decline in commission revenue. Geographically, revenue for all regions increased with Asia recording 46% increase for the comparable quarters. Margins

21Equipment solutions group. The group’s gross margin of 24.2% for six month and fourteen day period of fiscal 2005 increased 180 basis points from 22.4% when compared to the nine-month period of fiscal 2004. Of the improvement in gross margins, approximately 30 and 70 basis points pertained to the sale of products where inventory had been previously written down during the same periods of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. Increased margins are primarily due to a change in mix where legacy product for six-month and fourteen period of fiscal 2005 represented 22.4% of Equipment solutions group sales compared to 7.7% for the nine months of fiscal 2004. Legacy product sales achieved 39% gross margin for the first six-month and fourteen-day period of fiscal 2005 compared to 18.6% for the nine-month period in fiscal 2004. The Eclipse line was acquired in September 2003, accordingly the nine-month period ending on February 29, 2004 had only six months of the of the Eclipse operations. The gross margin of all other product lines fell, except Specialty equipment – spare parts.

~~Gross~~Fab ~~Margins~~solutions group. The ~~following~~gross ~~table~~margin ~~shows~~of ~~our~~19.6% ~~gross~~for ~~margins~~the fab solutions group decreased 80 basis points for ~~our~~the ~~equipment~~six-month and ~~fab~~fourteen-day period ~~solutions~~of ~~groups:~~fiscal 2005 when compared to the nine-month period in fiscal 2004. Margins for both parts cleaning improved while margins for the repair center component declined dramatically.

	Three Months Ended November 30,
	2004		2003
Gross margins
Equipment solutions group	26.4	%	21.2	%
Fab solutions group	20.3	%	20.5	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A). SG&A expenses for the six-month and fourteen-day period of fiscal 2005 were $27.4 million, down $12.0 million from the $39.4 million incurred for the nine-month period of 2004. SG&A expenses consist principally of salaries and other employment-related costs, occupancy costs, travel and entertainment, communications and computer-related expense, trade show and professional services and depreciation. Our SG&A expenses are a function principally of our total headcount. The decline in expense is primarily due to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 having only fourteen days of operations.

~~Equipment solutions group. The group's gross margin of 26.4% for our second quarter of fiscal 2005 increased 520 basis points~~Restructuring ~~from 21~~costs.2% ~~when~~During ~~compared to our second quarter of fiscal 2004. Of~~ the ~~improvement~~six-month ~~in gross margins, approximately 60~~ and 20fourteen-day ~~basis~~period ~~points pertained to the sale~~ of ~~products where inventory had been previously written down during our second quarters of~~ fiscal 2005 ~~and 2004~~, ~~respectively.~~the ~~Margins~~Company ~~from~~terminated ~~the~~15 ~~sale~~employees ofas ~~our~~follows: ~~legacy~~the equipment ~~and spare parts contributed to the~~solutions ~~increase~~group ~~primarily~~terminated ~~because~~7 ofemployees, the ~~higher~~fab ~~margins~~solutions ongroup ~~the~~terminated ~~sales~~2 ~~of spare parts from the Eclipse product line acquired during our second quarter of fiscal 2004. Margins for specialty equipment~~ employees and ~~spare parts~~6 ~~increased~~terminated ~~only~~employees ~~slightly~~were inpart ~~our second quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~finance ~~2005. Additionally, service margins declined between comparable quarters. Geographically, margins improved in the United States, but declined in Europe~~ and ~~Asia~~administration.

~~Fab~~During the nine-month period of fiscal 2004, the Company terminated 73 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 35 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 28 employees and 10 terminated employees were part of finance and administration. The ~~gross~~Company ~~margin~~incurred ofapproximately 20$1.3%9 ~~for~~million of restructuring costs in the ~~fab~~equipment solutions ~~group~~segment, ~~decreased~~of 20which ~~basis~~$1.1 ~~points~~million was for ~~our~~personnel ~~second~~terminations ~~quarter of~~and ~~fiscal~~$0.8 ~~2005~~million ~~when~~pertained ~~compared~~ to the ~~same~~cost ~~quarter~~of inthe abandonment ~~fiscal~~of ~~2004.~~leased ~~Margins~~facilities, ~~for~~leasehold ~~parts~~improvements ~~cleaning~~and ~~units~~fixed assets. The ~~increased~~fab ~~while~~solutions ~~materials~~group ~~components~~incurred ~~declined~~approximately $0.8 ~~Geographically~~million of restructuring costs, ~~margins~~of ~~improvement~~which in$0.3 ~~Asia~~million was ~~offset by~~for apersonnel ~~decline~~terminations inand $0.5 ~~both~~million ~~Europe~~pertained ~~and~~to the ~~United~~abandonment ~~States~~of leased facilities. ~~Additionally,~~Other ~~for~~groups incurred ~~our~~approximately ~~second~~$0.6 ~~quarter~~million of ~~fiscal~~restructuring ~~2005~~costs, ~~the~~of ~~overall~~which ~~decline~~$0.5 million was for personnel terminations and $0.1 million pertained to the abandonment of leased facilities. In estimating the ~~group's~~accrual ~~margins~~for asabandoned leased facilities, the ~~result~~Company ofmade ~~higher~~assumptions ~~warehousing~~regarding ~~costs,~~the ~~and~~future ~~lower~~sublease ~~material~~income ~~commission~~of ~~revenue.~~these facilities

~~Selling,~~Transaction costs ~~general~~for ~~and~~sale ~~administrative~~of ~~expenses~~subsidiaries ~~(SG&A). SG&A~~and ~~expenses~~substantially ~~for~~all ~~second~~assets ~~quarter~~to ~~of fiscal 2005 were~~Applied ~~$13.0 million~~Materials, ~~down $0.2~~ ~~million or 1~~Inc.5% ~~from~~During ~~the~~our ~~$13.2 million~~six-month ~~incurred for the same quarter in fiscal 2004. SG&A expenses consist principally of salaries~~ and ~~other employment~~fourteen-~~related~~day ~~costs,~~period of ~~occupancy~~fiscal ~~costs~~2005, ~~travel~~we ~~and~~incurred ~~entertainment~~legal, ~~communications~~accounting and ~~computer-related~~other ~~expense, trade show and~~ professional ~~services~~fees ~~and depreciation. Our SG&A expenses are a function principally~~ of ~~our total headcount~~ $2.6 ~~Over~~million ~~60%~~that ofpertained ~~our~~to ~~operating~~the ~~expenses~~Applied ~~consist of salaries and other employment-related costs~~transaction.

~~Restructuring~~Research, development ~~costs~~and engineering. ~~During~~ ~~the~~The ~~second~~expenses ~~quarter~~for ~~of fiscal 2005~~research, development ~~the~~and ~~Company~~engineering ~~terminated~~for 8the ~~employees~~six-month asand ~~the~~fourteen-day ~~result~~period of ~~cost~~fiscal ~~cutting~~2005 ~~initiatives. The equipment solutions group terminated 3 employees and 5 terminated employees~~ were ~~part~~$1.2 ofmillion ~~finance~~compared ~~and~~to ~~administration~~$1.8 ~~The~~million ~~Company~~for ~~incurred~~the ~~approximately~~nine-month ~~$0.4 million~~period of ~~restructuring~~2004. ~~costs~~The decrease in ~~the~~expense ~~equipment~~is ~~solutions segment~~ primarily ~~for~~due ~~personnel~~to ~~terminations.~~the ~~The~~third ~~finance~~quarter ~~and~~of ~~administration~~fiscal 2005 ~~group~~having ~~incurred~~only ~~approximately~~fourteen ~~$0.4 million~~days of ~~restructuring costs primarily for personnel terminations~~operations.

~~During~~Other ~~the second quarter of fiscal 2004~~expense, the Company terminated 19 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 2 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 16 employees and 1 terminated employee was part of finance and administrationnet. The following ~~Company~~table ~~incurred~~summarizes ~~approximately~~the ~~$0.7 million~~components of ~~restructuring~~other ~~costs~~income ~~in the equipment solutions segment while the fab solutions group incurred approximately $0~~(expense).~~7 million.~~

Closing costs for sale of subsidiaries and substantially all assets to Applied Materials, Inc. During our second quarter of fiscal 2005, we incurred legal, accounting and other professional fees of $2.4 million that pertained to the Applied transaction. 19

	For the period from June 1, 2004 to December 14, 2004			For the nine months ended February 29, 2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	$	107		$	(460	)
Interest income	65			45
Interest expense	(1,782		)	(1,546		)
Other income (expense)	(162		)	42
Other expense, net	$	(1,772	)	$	(1,919	)

~~Research~~We engaged in limited hedging activities to reduce our exposure to exchange risks arising from fluctuations in foreign currency, ~~development~~but ~~and~~because ~~engineering~~hedging activities can be costly, we did not attempt to cover all potential foreign currency exposures. During each ~~the~~of ~~second~~our ~~quarter~~six-month ofand fourteen-day period for fiscal 2005 and nine-month period for 2004, ~~research~~we entered into contracts to hedge firm purchase commitments, to ~~development~~hedge ~~and~~the ~~engineering~~maturities of foreign currency denominated liabilities with ~~amounted~~foreign currency denominated assets and to ~~$0.5 million~~hedge ordifferences aexisting ~~decline~~between foreign ofcurrency $0assets and liabilities.~~3 million~~ ~~from~~The ~~the~~currencies ~~$0.8 million~~in ~~for~~which ~~the~~we ~~same~~purchased forward ~~quarter~~exchange ofcontracts ~~fiscal~~had ~~2004~~numerous ~~due~~market makers to ~~the~~provide ~~termination~~ample ofdepth and ~~personnel.~~liquidity for our hedging activities.

~~Six-months~~Interest income ~~ended~~represented ~~November 30,~~primarily ~~2004~~ earnings on our available cash balances. The decrease in our interest income for each of the fiscal quarters was a result of lower average cash balances and of lower interest rates.

~~Net~~Interest expense ~~Revenue~~reflects interest on our borrowings as well as the accretion of non-cash interest discount related to our convertible debentures, which resulted from the $3. ~~The~~5 ~~following~~million ~~table~~for ~~shows~~the fair value of the warrants, and $3.4 million from the deemed dividend relating to the issuing of our ~~net~~$13.0 ~~revenue~~million of convertible debentures. Interest accretion from the non-cash deemed dividend for the beneficial conversion feature and ~~percent~~the amortization of ~~net~~the ~~revenue~~placement agent fees for ~~our~~the ~~equipment~~six-month and fourteen ~~fab~~day ~~solutions~~period ~~groups:~~of fiscal 2005 was approximately $0.5 million. We recorded an additional interest expense of $6.2 million that represents the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt discount to record the principal amount of its convertible debentures of $13.0 million with the closing of the transaction with Applied, and wrote-off $0.5 million as interest expense for the unamortized placement agent fees that remained at December 14, 2004. See - Note 5.

	Six Months Ended November 30,
	2004			2003
Net revenue (dollars in millions)
Equipment solutions group	$	37.2		$	28.0
Fab solutions group		76.6			62.9
Net revenue
Equipment solutions group		32.7	%		30.8	%
Fab solutions group		67.3			69.2

Other income for our year-to-date periods of fiscal 2005 and 2004 consisted of various miscellaneous non-operating income and expense.

~~Equipment~~Provision for ~~solutions~~Income ~~group~~Taxes. ~~The~~ ~~equipment~~For ~~group net revenue in~~ our ~~six~~year-~~month~~to-date ~~period~~periods of fiscal 2005 ~~was~~ ~~$37.2 million~~and 2004, upour ~~$9.2 million~~tax orprovision ~~32.9%~~represented ~~from~~income ~~the~~tax ~~same~~on ~~period~~taxable ofincome ~~fiscal~~in ~~2004.~~foreign jurisdictions ~~The~~primarily ~~increase~~in ~~between~~Asia. ~~the~~We ~~comparable~~established ~~six-month~~a ~~periods~~valuation ~~primarily~~allowance ~~reflects~~for ~~the contribution~~ all of our ~~legacy~~ ~~product~~net ~~revenues~~deferred ~~for~~tax ~~equipment~~assets ~~and~~during ~~spare~~fiscal ~~parts.~~2003, ~~Service~~due ~~revenues~~to ~~and~~the ~~commissions~~uncertainty ~~decreased~~of our ~~for~~ability ~~the~~to ~~comparable~~generate ~~periods.~~sufficient ~~Geographically,~~taxable ~~equipment~~income ~~revenues~~to inrealize ~~Asia~~these ~~more~~net ~~than doubled, together~~deferred ~~with~~tax ~~increased~~assets. ~~revenue~~This inallowance ~~the~~has ~~United~~been ~~States,~~maintained ~~offset~~due ~~the~~to ~~23%~~recurring ~~revenue decline for Europe~~losses.

~~Fab~~Liquidity solutions group. In our six-month period of fiscal 2005, the fab solutions group revenue was $76.6 million, up $13.7 million or 21.8% from the group's revenue in the same period of fiscal 2004. Increased revenues from parts cleaning units, material sales and ~~our~~Capital ~~repair centers were offset by a slight decline in commission revenue. Geographically, all regions showed improvement with revenue for Asia almost doubling against the comparable six-month periods.~~ Resources

~~Gross~~We ~~Margins. The~~defined ~~following~~liquidity ~~table~~as our ~~shows~~ability to generate resources to pay our ~~gross~~current ~~margins~~obligations ~~for~~and to finance our ~~equipment~~growth during periods of business expansion. Our principal requirement for capital was for working capital to finance receivables and ~~fab~~inventories. ~~solutions~~Our principal ~~groups:~~sources of liquidity were positive cash flows from operations, bank borrowings and the private placement of debt. We issued convertible debentures in August 2003 and June 2004 and obtained a total of $12.3 million of proceeds, net of the aggregate $0.7 million of cash issuance costs for both issues. Our working capital, current assets less current liabilities, was $47.6 million and $36.1 million at December 14, 2004 and May 31, 2004, respectively. Our current ratio, current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.7 and 1.4 at December 14, 2004 and May 31, 2004, respectively.

	Six Months Ended November 30,
	2004		2003
Gross margins
Equipment solutions group	24.7	%	21.1	%
Fab solutions group	20.5	%	20.3	%

Operating Activities.

~~Equipment~~During ~~solutions group. The group's gross margin of 24.7% for~~ the six-month and fourteen-day period offor fiscal 2005, ~~increased 360~~we ~~basis~~used ~~points~~cash ~~from~~totaling 21$9.1%4 ~~when~~million ~~compared to the same period of fiscal 2004. Of the improvement~~ in ~~gross margins, approximately 30 and 60 basis points pertained to the sale of products where inventory~~our ~~had~~operating ~~been~~activities. Nortem ~~previously written down during six~~reduced non-~~month~~cash ~~periods~~current ~~of fiscal 2005 and 2004~~assets, ~~respectively~~generating $21.9 ~~Margins~~million ~~from the sale~~ of ~~our~~operating ~~legacy~~cash ~~equipment~~flow, ~~and spare parts contributed to the increase~~which ~~primarily~~was ~~because~~more ofthan ~~the~~offset ~~higher~~by ~~margins~~reducing oncurrent ~~the~~liabilities ~~sales~~by of$26.3 ~~spare parts from the Eclipse product line acquired during our second quarter of fiscal 2004~~million. ~~However,~~The ~~margins for specialty equipment and spare~~cash ~~parts~~usage ~~declined~~primarily ~~due~~pertained to ~~the~~cash ~~mix~~payments offor ~~low~~accounts ~~margin sales during the six-month period of fiscal 2005. Additionally~~payable, ~~service~~amounts ~~margins~~due ~~declined between comparable quarters. Geographically, margins~~to ~~improved~~affiliates inand ~~both~~ the ~~United~~decrease ~~States and Europe, but declined~~ in ~~Asia.~~deferred revenue.

2320

~~Fab~~Subsequent ~~solutions~~to ~~group. The~~December 16, 2004 ~~gross~~we ~~margin~~have ofbeen 20in liquidation and have substantially reduced our working capital requirements.5% ~~for~~As ~~the~~of ~~fab~~February 28, ~~solutions~~2005, ~~group~~Nortem ~~increased~~had 20approximately $88.0 ~~basis~~million ~~points~~in ~~for~~cash ~~our~~and cash equivalents. ~~six-month~~Our ~~period~~working ofcapital ~~fiscal~~requirements ~~2005~~are ~~when~~now ~~compared~~minimal. toWe ~~the~~believe ~~same~~that existing ~~period~~cash inand ~~fiscal~~cash ~~2004.~~equivalents ~~Margins~~will ~~for~~be ~~both~~sufficient ~~parts~~to ~~cleaning~~meet ~~units~~our ~~improved~~remaining operating ~~while~~and ~~margins~~capital requirements for ~~materials~~at ~~components~~least ~~declined.~~the next twelve months or until ~~Geographically,~~a ~~margins~~final ~~improvement~~liquidation inoccurs. We ~~Asia~~believe we ~~was~~have ~~offset~~sufficient byassets ato ~~decline~~satisfy incurrently ~~both~~identified ~~Europe~~creditors and ~~the~~make ~~United~~a final ~~States.~~distribution ~~Additionally,~~to ~~for~~shareholders. ~~our~~As ~~first~~soon ~~six-months~~as ofpracticable ~~fiscal~~under ~~2005,~~The Netherlands ~~the~~law ~~overall~~and ~~increase~~dissolution ofprocedures ~~the group's~~we ~~margins~~intend ~~were~~to ~~offset~~make bya ~~higher~~final distribution ~~warehousing~~to ~~costs,~~our shareholders and ~~lower~~dissolve ~~material~~the ~~commission revenue~~Company.

~~Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A). SG&A expenses for the six-month period of fiscal 2005 were~~Investing $25.1 million, down $1.0 million or 3.8% from the $26.1 million incurred for the same period in fiscal 2004. SG&A expenses consist principally of salaries and other employment- related costs, occupancy costs, travel and entertainment, communications and computer-related expense, trade show and professional services and depreciation. Our SG&A expenses are a function principally of our total headcount. Over 60% of our operating expenses consist of salaries and other employment-related costs. Activities

~~Restructuring~~Our ~~costs. During~~capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment for the six-month and fourteen-day period of fiscal 2005, and the ~~Company~~nine-month ~~terminated~~period 13of ~~employees~~2004 astotaled ~~follows: the~~$1.0 ~~equipment~~million ~~solutions~~and ~~group terminated 5 employees~~$1.8 million, respectively. During the ~~fab~~same periods ~~solutions~~of ~~group~~fiscal ~~terminated~~2005 2and ~~employees~~2004, we invested $0.1 million and $0.6 ~~terminated~~million, respectively, ~~employees~~in ~~were~~our ~~part~~management ofinformation ~~finance~~system. ~~and~~To date, ~~administration.~~we Ofhave ~~the~~invested $18.3 9 million ofin the ~~personnel~~new ~~costs~~system. During ~~accrued~~our ~~during the~~ six-month and fourteen-day period of fiscal 2005, ~~approximately~~we ~~$0.8 million~~incurred ~~pertained~~legal, toaccounting ~~personnel~~and ~~terminated~~other professional ~~during~~fees ~~fiscal~~of ~~year 2004~~$2.6 ~~The~~million ~~Company~~that ~~incurred~~pertained to the Applied transaction, of which approximately $0.6 2 million ofhas ~~restructuring~~been ~~costs~~paid inas ~~the~~of ~~equipment~~December 14, ~~solutions~~2004. Upon ~~segment~~sale ~~primarily~~of ~~for~~substantially ~~personnel~~all ~~terminations.~~of ~~The~~our subsidiaries ~~fab~~and ~~solutions~~assets ~~group~~to ~~incurred~~Applied, we transferred approximately $07.~~3 million~~2 ofmillion ~~restructuring~~of ~~costs~~cash ~~for~~to ~~personnel~~Applied. Subsequent ~~terminations~~to entering liquidation, ~~while~~there ~~finance~~have ~~and~~been ~~administration~~no ~~incurred approximately $0~~investments.~~4 million.~~

~~During~~Financing the six-month period of fiscal 2004, the Company terminated 46 employees as follows: the equipment solutions group terminated 21 employees, the fab solutions group terminated 21 employees and 4 terminated employees were part of finance and administrationActivities. The Company incurred approximately $1.5 million of restructuring costs in the equipment solutions segment, of which $0.7 million was for personnel terminations and $0.8 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities, leasehold improvements and fixed assets. The fab solutions group incurred approximately $0.7 million of restructuring costs, of which $0.3 million was for personnel terminations and $0.4 million pertained to the cost of the abandonment of leased facilities, leasehold improvements and fixed assets. Other groups incurred approximately $0.3 million of restructuring costs, which primarily pertained to personnel terminations.

~~Closing~~Debt. In ~~costs~~June 2004, the ~~for~~Company ~~sale~~issued convertible debentures and warrants due in June 2008, in the principal amount of ~~subsidiaries~~$6.0 million with an annual interest rate of 6.5%, payable quarterly beginning September 2004. In August 2003, the Company issued convertible debentures and ~~substantially~~warrants due in February 2007, in the principal amount of $7.0 million with an annual interest rate of 8%, payable quarterly beginning December 1, 2003. On February 11, 2005, the Company offered all ~~assets~~convertible debenture holders, including those debenture holders who remitted funds to ~~Applied~~exercise ~~Materials~~their warrants, ~~Inc~~ a cash payment upon surrender of their debentures and/or warrants equal to $4. ~~During~~65 ~~our~~per ~~second~~common ~~quarter~~share equivalent that would have been issuable under the debenture and warrant agreement absent the transaction with Applied, reduced by the amount of ~~fiscal~~the aggregate price payable with respect to the warrants. On March 7, 2005, all weconvertible ~~incurred~~debenture ~~legal~~holders accepted the Company’s offer, ~~accounting~~and surrendered their debentures and/or ~~other~~warrants, ~~professional~~which ~~fees~~were then cancelled. In March 2005, the Company returned to convertible debenture holders their deposit of $25.4 6 million, ~~that~~and ~~pertained~~paid approximately $18.0 million to settle the ~~Applied~~cash-out ~~transaction~~offer.

~~Research,~~Equity. During ~~development~~the six-month and ~~engineering. The~~fourteen ~~expenses~~day period ~~for~~of ~~research~~fiscal 2005, ~~development~~we ~~and~~received ~~engineering~~$0.3 ~~remained~~million ~~flat~~from our employees for the ~~six-month~~exercise ~~period~~ of ~~fiscal~~15,000 ~~2005~~common atshares ~~$1.1 million~~from ~~when~~stock ~~compared~~option toplans and the ~~same~~purchase ~~period~~ of 85,000 ~~2004.~~common shares through our employee stock purchase plan.

24Current and future liquidity position.

~~Other~~On ~~expense~~December 10, ~~net~~2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the Purchase Agreement with Applied. With the close of the transaction on December 14, 2004, the Company received $84.6 million from Applied, and commenced liquidation of the Company. Due to the consummation of the transaction with Applied we no longer have continuing operations, and have no sources for revenue. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to handle current commitments, and we do not expect to need further financing or borrowing facilities. We are in the process of winding down the business and liquidating our assets. We expect to complete the liquidation process by June 2005, at which time we will distribute the remainder of the cash held by the Company after the settling of the Company’s liabilities, to the shareholders of the Company. The ~~following~~forecast ~~table~~of ~~summarizes~~our financial resources from the ~~components~~closing of the Applied transaction through the liquidation of the Company are expected to be adequate to support our liquidation is a forward-looking statement. This statement involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other ~~income~~factors ~~(expense)~~that may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risk factors are discussed under Risk Factors—Risks Related to Nortem and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

	Three months ended November 30,						Six months ended November 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in thousands)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	$	184		$	(256	)	$	192		$	(326	)
Interest income		35			16			63			23
Interest expense		(907	)		(520	)		(1,737	)		(753	)
Other income (expense)		213			(25	)		329			(87	)
Other expense, net	$	(475	)	$	(785	)	$	(1,153	)	$	(1,143	)

The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations as of February 28, 2005. Settlement with the debenture holders was reached by March 7, 2005.

We engaged in limited hedging activities to reduce our exposure to exchange risks arising from fluctuations in foreign currency, but because hedging activities can be costly, we did not attempt to cover all potential foreign currency exposures. During each of our six-month periods for fiscal 2005 and 2004, we entered into contracts to hedge firm purchase commitments, to hedge the maturities of foreign currency denominated liabilities with foreign currency denominated assets and to hedge differences existing between foreign currency assets and liabilities. The currencies in which we purchased forward exchange contracts had numerous market makers to provide ample depth and liquidity for our hedging activities. During our six-month period of fiscal 2004, approximately $0.3 million of the foreign exchange loss pertained to the cost of hedging the Israel Shekel, which was primarily due to the difference in the interest rates between the United States dollar and Israel Shekel. 21

~~Interest income~~Payments ~~represented~~Due ~~primarily~~By ~~earnings on our available cash balances. The decrease in our interest income for each of the fiscal quarters was a result of lower average cash balances and of lower interest rates.~~ Period

~~Interest expense~~Contractual ~~reflects~~Obligations ~~interest on our borrowings as well as the accretion of non-cash interest discount related to our convertible debentures, which resulted from the $3.5 million for the fair value of the warrants,~~ and ~~$3.4 million~~Commercial from the deemed dividend relating to the issuing of our $13.0 million of convertible debentures. Interest accretion from the non-cash deemed dividend for the beneficial conversion feature and the amortization of the placement agent fees for our second quarter and six-month period of fiscal 2005 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. We expect to record additional interest expense of $6.2 million that represents the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt discount to record the principal amount of its convertible debentures of $13.0 million with the closing of the Applied transaction in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Additionally, we expect to write-off $0.5 million as interest expense for the unamortized placement agent fees that remained at November 30, 2004. Commitments

Other income for our six-month periods of fiscal 2005 and 2004 consisted of various miscellaneous non-operating income and expense.

	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years	3 – 5 Years	After 5 Years
	(Dollars in thousands)
Convertible debentures	$	18,017	$	18,017	—	—	—
Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments for cash	$	18,017	$	18,017	—	—	—

~~Provision~~Transactions ~~for~~with ~~Income Taxes. For our first quarters of fiscal 2005 and 2004, our tax provision represented income tax on~~related taxable income in foreign jurisdictions primarily in Asia. We established a valuation allowance for all of our net deferred tax assets during fiscal 2003, due to the uncertainty of our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize these net deferred tax assets. This allowance has been maintained due to recurring losses. parties:

25FSI, an affiliate, owned approximately 11.6% of the outstanding shares of the Company as of December 14, 2004. The Company purchased goods from FSI for resale in the normal course of business under terms and conditions similar to those with unrelated vendors. Such purchases totaled approximately less than $0.1 million and $1.0 million for the period from June 1, 2004 through December 14, 2004 and for the nine-month period ended February 29, 2004, respectively. Sales to FSI for the same comparable periods were approximately $1.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively. At December 14, 2004 and May 31, 2004, amounts receivable from FSI were $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively while payables FSI were $0.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

~~Liquidity~~As of December 14, 2004, the Company had accounts receivable from Applied of approximately $0.3 million. We sold approximately $1.9 million of products to Applied for the six-month and ~~Capital~~fourteen-day ~~Resources~~ period ended December 14, 2004. Additionally, we accrued approximately $2.4 million for Applied transaction closing costs we incurred at December 14, 2004.

WeIn ~~defined~~July 1995, ~~liquidity~~an asofficer/Managing ~~our~~Director ~~ability~~of tothe Company ~~generate~~entered ~~resources~~into toa ~~pay~~Tax ~~our~~Indemnification ~~current~~Agreement ~~obligations~~(“TIA”) ~~and~~with tothe ~~finance~~Company as ~~our~~part ~~growth~~of ~~during~~its ~~periods~~acquisition of ~~business~~Transpacific ~~expansion~~Technology Corporation. At ~~Our~~the time of the acquisition and until it ~~principal~~completed ~~requirement~~its ~~for~~initial ~~capital~~public ~~was~~offering ~~for~~in ~~working~~November 1999, ~~capital~~The toCompany ~~finance~~was ~~receivables~~a ~~and~~“controlled foreign ~~inventories.~~corporation” ~~Our~~under ~~principal~~Subpart ~~sources~~F of ~~liquidity~~the ~~were~~US ~~positive~~Internal ~~cash~~Revenue ~~flows~~Code ~~from operations~~(“Subpart F”), ~~bank~~and ~~borrowings~~as ~~and~~a “US person” the officer/director was liable for personal income ~~private~~tax ~~placement~~on ofincome ~~debt~~imputed to him under Subpart F. Under Wethe ~~issued~~agreement, ~~convertible~~the ~~debentures~~Company inhas ~~August 2003~~provided ~~and~~cash ~~June 2004~~advances ~~and~~for ~~obtained~~taxes due afor ~~total~~Subpart ofF income that totaled $~~12.3 million~~270,000 as of ~~proceeds~~February 28, ~~net~~2004. Under ofthe TIA, the ~~aggregate~~now former officer/Managing Director is required to repay ~~$0.7 million~~these advances only to the extent that he benefits from the increase in the tax basis of ~~cash~~his ~~issuance~~holding ~~costs~~of ~~for~~stock ~~both~~of ~~issues~~the Company. ~~Our~~Accordingly, ~~working~~in ~~capital~~fiscal 2001, ~~current~~the Company ~~assets~~recorded ~~less~~an ~~current~~allowance ~~liabilities~~of $160,000 ~~was~~against ~~$36~~these advances.~~1 million~~ Repayment atof ~~both~~a ~~November 30,~~portion ~~2004~~of ~~and~~the ~~May 31,~~advances is ~~2004.~~required ~~Our~~beginning ~~current~~with ~~ratio,~~the ~~current~~first ~~assets~~sale ~~divided~~of byshares ~~current~~owned ~~liabilities,~~by ~~was~~the 1former officer/director.6 The ~~and~~advances ~~1.4~~were atto be ~~November 30,~~repaid ~~2004~~when ~~and~~the ~~May 31,~~former ~~2004,~~officer/shareholder ~~respectively~~received the initial distribution from the liquidation of Nortem. To date, the former officer/shareholder has not repaid the advance.

Effect Operatingof Activities. Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Exchange Rate Risk Management

~~During~~A ~~the~~significant ~~six-month~~portion ~~period~~of our ~~for~~business ~~fiscal~~was ~~2005,~~conducted weoutside ~~used~~of ~~cash~~the ~~totaling~~United ~~$5.5 million~~States inthrough our ~~operating activities~~foreign subsidiaries. ~~Our~~While ~~net~~most ~~loss~~of ~~adjusted for non-cash operating expenses reduced~~ our ~~operating~~international ~~cash~~sales ~~flow~~were bydenominated ~~$2.9 million, while reduction~~ in ~~assets~~United States ~~contributed operating cash flows of $19.1 million~~dollars, ~~which~~some ~~was~~were ~~offset~~denominated ~~by the usage of operating cash flow of $21.7 million from net decreases~~ in ~~liabilities,~~various ~~and~~foreign ~~other non-current assets and liabilities~~currencies. ~~The~~To ~~cash usage primarily pertained to cash~~the ~~payments~~extent ~~for~~that ~~accounts~~our ~~payable~~sales and ~~amounts~~operating ~~due~~expenses towere ~~affiliates.~~denominated Inin ~~the six-month period ended November 30~~foreign currencies, ~~2003, we used cash totaling $2.1 million in~~ our operating ~~activities. Our~~results ~~net~~may ~~loss~~have ~~plus~~been ~~non-cash~~adversely ~~income~~affected ~~statement~~by ~~items~~changes in ~~totaled~~exchange ~~$(9~~rates.3) ~~million,~~Although ~~which~~we ~~was~~engaged ~~partially~~in ~~offset~~foreign bycurrency ~~the~~hedging ~~positive~~transactions from ~~cash~~time ~~flow~~to oftime, ~~$7.2 million~~these ~~from~~hedging ~~changes~~transactions incan ~~assets~~be ~~and liabilities~~costly, ~~primarily~~and ~~from~~therefore, awe did ~~reduction~~not ofattempt ~~accounts~~to ~~receivable~~cover ~~and~~all ~~inventories~~potential ~~from~~foreign ~~lower~~currency ~~sales~~exposures. ~~and~~These hedging ~~increased~~techniques ~~cash~~did ~~collections,~~not ~~and~~eliminate ~~partially~~all ~~for~~of the ~~increase~~effects inof ~~accounts~~foreign ~~payable~~currency fluctuations ~~timing~~on ofanticipated ~~payments to vendors~~revenue.

We ~~Investing~~entered ~~Activities~~liquidation with no outstanding foreign exchange contracts and have done no foreign currency hedging while in liquidation.

OurITEM capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment for the first six-month period of fiscal 2005 and 2004 totaled $13.0 million and $1.2 million,QUANTITATIVE respectively.AND InQUALITATIVE eachDISCLOSURES six-monthABOUT periodsMARKET of fiscal 2005 and 2004, we invested $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in our management information system. To date, we have invested $8.9 million in the new system. RISK

See ~~Financing~~“Effect ~~Activities~~of Currency Exchange Rate and Exchange Rate Risk Management” and “Market Risk” under Part I, Item 2 of this report.

Debt. In June 2004, the Company issued convertible debentures and warrants due in June 2008, in the principal amount of $6.0 million with an annual interest rate of 6.5%, payable quarterly beginning September 2004. In August 2003, the Company issued convertible debentures and warrants due in February 2007, in the principal amount of $7.0 million with an annual interest rate of 8%, payable quarterly beginning December 1, 2003. 22

~~Equity. During~~ITEM ~~the six-month period of fiscal 2005, we received $0~~4.~~2 million~~ CONTROLS ~~from~~AND ~~our employees for the exercise of 15,000 common shares from stock option plans and the purchase of 45,000 common shares through our employee stock purchase plan.~~ PROCEDURES

Evaluation of ~~Current~~Disclosure Controls and ~~future liquidity position.~~ Procedures

AsBased on their evaluation of ~~November 30,~~our ~~2004,~~disclosure wecontrols ~~had~~and ~~$11.5 million~~procedures of(as defined ~~cash~~in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) ~~cash~~as ~~equivalents~~of ~~and~~the ~~$16.1 million~~end of ~~short-term~~the ~~borrowings~~period ~~and~~covered ~~current portion~~by ofthis ~~long-term~~quarterly ~~debt~~report, ofthe Company’s ~~which~~Principal ~~$14.1 million~~Executive ~~was~~Officer ~~outstanding~~and ~~under~~Principal ~~our~~Financial ~~various~~Officer, ~~borrowing~~Charles Roffey, ~~facilities~~concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and $procedures (1.2) ~~million~~were adequate ~~was~~and ~~due~~effective to ~~TEL.~~ensure ~~Borrowing~~that ~~facilities,~~material ~~other~~information ~~than~~relating to the ~~CIT~~Company, ~~facility~~including ~~which~~its ~~was~~consolidated ~~renewable in November 2005~~subsidiaries, ~~were~~was ~~payable~~made onknown ~~demand~~to orhim ~~subject~~by others towithin ~~periodic~~those ~~review~~entities, byparticularly during the ~~lenders.~~period ~~Certain~~in ofwhich ~~our~~this quarterly ~~credit~~report ~~facilities~~was ~~contained~~being ~~financial~~prepared ~~covenants~~and (2) provide that information required us to ~~meet~~be ~~and~~disclosed ~~maintain~~by ~~certain~~the ~~financial~~Company ~~conditions.~~in Asthe ofreports ~~November 30~~that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, ~~2004~~including information regarding its consolidated subsidiaries, is werecorded, ~~were~~processed, insummarized ~~compliance~~and ~~with~~reported ~~all~~within ofthe ~~our~~time ~~covenants~~periods specified in ~~our~~the ~~credit~~SEC’s ~~facilities.~~rules and forms.

26Changes in Internal Controls

OnAs previously disclosed ~~December~~in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 12, 2004, our independent registered public accounting firm, in connection with the completion ~~shareholders~~of their audit of, and the issuance of their report on the Company’s consolidated ~~approved~~financial statements for the ~~Purchase~~year ~~Agreement~~ended ~~with~~May 31, ~~Applied.~~2004, identified ~~With~~deficiencies that existed in the ~~close~~design or operation of the ~~transaction~~Company’s internal oncontrols ~~December 14~~that they considered to be a material weakness in the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls pursuant to standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A significant deficiency is defined as a control deficiency, ~~2004~~or combination of deficiencies, that adversely affects the ~~Company~~company’s ability to initiate, ~~received~~authorize, ~~$84~~record, process or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the company’s financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.~~6 million~~ A ~~from~~material ~~Applied~~weakness is a significant deficiency, ~~and~~or ~~commenced~~combination ~~liquidation~~of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial ~~Company~~statements will not be prevented or detected. Our independent registered public accounting firm advised the Audit Committee of the Company’s Supervisory Board of the following matter, in July 2004, which they considered to be a material weakness: the Company’s internal controls over revenue recognition were not sufficient to ensure transactions were properly recorded in accordance with management’s criteria and generally accepted accounting principles.

~~Due~~Our independent toregistered ~~the~~public ~~consummation~~accounting offirm discussed the ~~transaction~~areas ~~with~~of ~~Applied,~~weakness wedescribed above nowith ~~longer~~the ~~have~~Audit ~~continuing operations, and have no sources for revenue~~Committee. WeThe ~~believe~~Audit ~~that~~Committee wetook ~~have~~an ~~sufficient~~active ~~liquidity~~role ~~to handle~~in ~~current~~responding ~~commitments, and we do not expect~~ to ~~need further financing or borrowing facilities. We are in~~ the ~~process~~deficiencies ofidentified ~~winding~~by ~~down the business and liquidating~~ our ~~assets.~~independent ~~The~~registered ~~forecast of our~~public ~~financial~~accountants, ~~resources~~including ~~from~~overseeing ~~the~~management’s ~~closing~~implementation of the ~~Applied~~remedial measures ~~transaction~~described ~~through~~below. ~~the~~To ~~liquidation~~this end, management of the Company ~~are~~worked ~~expected~~with the toAudit beCommittee ~~adequate~~ to ~~support~~identify ~~our liquidation is a forward-looking statement. This statement involves known~~ and ~~unknown~~implement ~~risks,~~any ~~uncertainties~~ and ~~other~~all ~~factors~~corrective actions that ~~may~~were ~~cause~~required ~~our,~~to orimprove ~~our~~the ~~industry's,~~effectiveness ~~actual results, levels~~ of ~~activity,~~the ~~performance~~Company’s ~~or achievements to be materially~~internal ~~different~~controls, ~~from~~including ~~any~~the ~~future~~enhancement ~~results, levels~~ of ~~activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by~~ the ~~forward-looking~~Company’s ~~statements.~~systems ~~These~~and ~~factors are discussed under Risk~~procedures. ~~Factors—Risks~~The ~~Related~~Company toimplemented ~~Nortem~~the ~~and~~following ~~elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.~~ measures:

~~The~~• reviewed ~~following~~financial ~~table~~controls ~~summarizes~~and ~~our~~procedures ~~contractual~~for ~~cash~~revenue ~~obligations as of November 30, 2004.~~ recognition;

Payments Due By Period Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years
	(Dollars in thousands)
Long-term debt payable to TEL including current portion	$	6,633	$	1,233	$	3,600	$	1,800	$	—
Other long-term debt including current portion		1,418		693		444		281		—
Convertible debentures		13,000		13,000		—		—		—
Short-term borrowing obligations		14,143		14,143		—		—		—
Operating lease obligations		15,094		4,976		4,725		2,621		2,772
Purchase commitments		18,794		18,794		—		—		—
License arrangement with TEL		4,800		1,200		2,400		1,200		—
Other long-term liabilities		2,573		54		827		—		1,692
Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments for cash	$	76,455	$	54,093	$	11,996	$	5,902	$	4,464

• assigned an individual in the Company’s equipment solutions group to be the revenue recognition manager;

On• conducted ~~December 14,~~revenue ~~2004~~recognition ~~with~~training ~~the sale~~ of ~~substantially~~personnel ~~all~~responsible offor ~~the~~authorizing ~~assets~~ and ~~the assumption of liabilities by Applied, only the $13.0 million of convertible debentures and~~ ~~approximately~~recording ~~$0.4 million~~revenue oftransactions ~~other~~throughout ~~long-term liabilities remained as contractual obligations and commitments of~~ the Company. As a result of the transaction with Applied, the holders of the convertible debentures will have the right either to convert the debentures into common shares and participate in the liquidating distribution or to receive a cash payment equal to 120% of the principal of $13.0 million or $15.6 million if all holders choose this option. The holders of warrants may exercise the warrants and receive the same liquidating distribution. ;

~~Transactions~~• required the ~~with~~review ~~related~~and ~~parties:~~ approval by certain officers of the Company for revenue transactions above a specified level;

~~FSI,~~ • engaged an ~~affiliate,~~independent ~~owned~~internal ~~approximately~~controls ~~11.7%~~consultant ofwho ~~the~~assisted ~~outstanding shares of~~ the Company ~~as of November 30, 2004. The Company purchased goods from FSI for resale~~ in ~~the normal course of business under terms and conditions similar to those with unrelated vendors. Such purchases totaled approximately less than $0.1 million and $0.8 million,~~ ~~respectively,~~documenting ~~for the six-month periods ended November 30, 2004~~ and ~~2003.~~developing ~~Sales~~current ~~to FSI for our second quarter of fiscal 2005~~ and ~~2004~~expanded ~~were~~internal ~~$0.6 million~~controls and ~~less than~~ ~~$0.1 million,~~procedures; ~~respectively, while sales for the six-month periods ended November 30, 2004~~ and 2003 were $1.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively. At November 30, 2004 and May 31, 2004, amounts receivable from FSI were $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively while payables FSI were $0.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

27• assigned Company employees to directly assist the independent internal controls consultant.

As of November 30, 2004, the Company had accounts receivable from Applied of approximately $0.3 million. We sold approximately $0.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of products to Applied for the three and six-month periods ended November 30, 2004. Additionally, we accrued approximately $2.4 million for the Applied transaction closing costs incurred at November 30, 2004. 23

~~In July 1995,~~Management anbelieves ~~officer/Managing Director of~~ the above ~~Company~~measures ~~entered~~have ~~into~~addressed ~~a Tax Indemnification Agreement ("TIA") with~~ the ~~Company~~matter asidentified ~~part~~by ofour ~~its acquisition of Transpacific~~independent ~~Technology~~registered ~~Corporation. At the time of the acquisition and until it completed its initial~~ public ~~offering~~accounting infirm ~~November 1999,~~as ~~The Company was~~ a ~~"controlled~~material ~~foreign~~weakness. ~~corporation"~~The ~~under~~Audit ~~Subpart F of~~Committee ~~the US Internal Revenue Code ("Subpart F"),~~ and ~~as a "US person"~~ the ~~officer/director~~liquidators ~~was~~will ~~liable~~continue ~~for personal income tax on income imputed~~ to ~~him~~monitor ~~under~~the ~~Subpart~~effectiveness F.of ~~Under~~ the ~~agreement, the~~ Company ~~has~~’s ~~provided~~internal ~~cash~~controls ~~advances~~and ~~for~~procedures ~~taxes~~including ~~due~~those ~~for~~pertaining ~~Subpart F income that totaled $270,000 as of November 30, 2004. Under the TIA, the officer/Managing Director is required~~ to ~~repay these advances only to~~revenue ~~the~~recognition ~~extent~~on ~~that~~an heongoing ~~benefits from the increase in the tax~~ basis ofand ~~his~~will ~~holding~~take offurther ~~stock of the Company. Accordingly~~action, inas ~~fiscal 2001, the Company recorded an allowance of $160,000 against these advances~~appropriate. Repayment of a portion of the advances is required beginning with the first sale of shares owned by the officer/director. The advances will be repaid when the officer/shareholder receives the initial distribution from the liquidation of Nortem.

~~Bank~~Limitations on ~~Borrowing~~the ~~Facilities~~ Effectiveness of Controls.

The ~~following~~Company’s ~~table~~liquidators ~~summarizes~~do ~~our~~not ~~material~~expect ~~borrowing~~that ~~facilities~~the Company’s disclosure controls and ~~most~~procedures ~~recent~~or ~~interest~~the ~~rates~~Company’s asinternal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of ~~November 30~~the control system are met. Further, ~~2004:~~the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. The inherent limitations in all control systems include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

	U.S. $ Equivalent Facility Amount		Amount Currently Outstanding		Maximum Amount Available(1)		Recent Interest Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
CIT	$	10,000	$	3,460	$	6,540	5.5%
HSBC		3,500		3,000		240	4.3%
Deutsche Bank		531		28		317	8.5%
Royal Bank of Scotland		6,249		3,848		2,225	5.9%
Bank Leumi		2,077		1,488		248	5.5%
All Others		3,593		2,319		1,232	3.3% to 9.8%
Total	$	25,950	$	14,143	$	10,802

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

~~Effect~~ITEM of1. LEGAL ~~Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Exchange Rate Risk Management~~ PROCEEDINGS

~~A significant portion of our business was conducted outside of the United States through our foreign subsidiaries. While most of our international sales were~~Not ~~denominated in United States dollars, some were denominated in various foreign currencies~~applicable. To the extent that our sales and operating expenses were denominated in foreign currencies, our operating results may have been adversely affected by changes in exchange rates.. Although we engaged in foreign currency hedging transactions from time to time, these hedging transactions can be costly, and therefore, we did not attempt to cover all potential foreign currency exposures. These hedging techniques did not eliminate all of the effects of foreign currency fluctuations on anticipated revenue.

28ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

~~Market Risk~~ (a) Not applicable.

~~At November 30, 2004, we had aggregate forward exchange contracts in various currencies as follows:~~ (b) Not applicable.

Currency	Amount Bought	Amount Sold	Weighted Average Contract Rate	Fair Value			Expiration Date
	(Dollars In thousands)
Euro	650	—	1.33	$	—		December 2004
Israeli Shekel	—	2,075	4.38		(2	)	December 2004
				$	(2	)

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS ~~QUANTITATIVE~~UPON ~~AND~~SENIOR ~~QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~ SECURITIES

~~See "Effect of Currency Exchange Rate and Exchange Rate Risk Management" and "Market Risk" under Part I, Item 2 of this report~~Not applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION ~~CONTROLS~~OF ~~AND~~MATTERS ~~PROCEDURES~~ TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

~~Evaluation~~The Company held its annual general meeting of ~~Disclosure~~shareholders ~~Controls~~on ~~and~~December 10, 2004. The ~~Procedures~~ following actions were voted upon at such meeting:

Due to the transaction with Applied, on December 14, 2004, Ed Segal, the Company's former Chief Executive officer and Douglas McCutcheon, the Company's former Chief Financial Officer, both resigned from their positions with the Company. Mr. Charles Roffey, was appointed by the shareholders as the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, upon the close of the transaction. Mr. Roffey was not an employee of the Company as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, however he has made an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, to the best of his ability. Based on his evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (1) were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to him by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report was being prepared and (2) provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, including information regarding its consolidated subsidiaries, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC. 24

Changes in Internal Controls

	Affirmative Votes	Negative Votes	Withheld Votes	Abstentions	Broker Non-Votes
1. Approval of the sale and transfer of substantially all of the Company’s stock and assets to Applied Materials, Inc.	9,650,290	7,148	—	7,700	2,349,939
2. Approval to dissolve and liquidate the Company following the closing of the asset sale and the appointment of Peter Verloop and Charles Roffey as liquidators, their authorization to select a custodial of the books and record and their - and the supervisory board’s remuneration	9,643,910	13,528	—	7,700	2,349,939
3. Approval to amend the Company’s articles of association and to designate each of the Company’s managing directors and each junior civil law notary working with NautaDutilh N.V. to apply for the declaration referred to in Article 2:125 of the Netherlands Civil Code, and to have the deed of amendment executed	9,589,059	39,324	—	36,755	2,349,939
4. Election of five supervisory directors to hold office until 2005:
Robert R. Anderson	11,985,125	—	29,952	—	—
Dana C. Ditmore	11,971,125	—	43,952	—	—
Joel A. Elftmann	11,971,125	—	38,952	—	—
William L. George	11,971,125	—	43,952	—	—
Bruce M. Jaffe	11,968,075	—	47,002	—	—
5. To approve the Company’s ability to issue common shares in an aggregate amount exceeding 19.999% of the Company’s outstanding shares pursuant to convertible debentures and warrants issued in June 2004	9,496,729	141,513	—	26,896	2,349,939
6. Adoption of the Company’s Annual Accounts for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004	11,986,618	5,324	—	23,135	—
7. Ratification of the selection of:a) PricewaterhouseCoopers N.V. as statutory auditors of the annual accounts, and b) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005	11,978,143	12,882	—	24,052	—
8. Authorization of the preparation of the Company’s Annual Reports for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 in the English language	11,971,661	7,324	—	36,092	—
9. To extend the authority of the Supervisory Board to issue shares and exclude pre-emptive rights	6,230,226	3,401,306	—	33,606	2,349,939
10. Approval of the compensation of the Supervisory Board for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005	9,515,773	68,108	—	81,257	2,349,939
11. To adopt the compensation policy for the Company’s Managing Board	10,062,802	1,874,984	—	77,291	—
12. To grant a discharge from liability to the Company’s Managing and Supervisory Board members relating to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2004	11,274,883	679,183	—	61,011	—

As previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on August 12, 2004, our independent registered public accounting firm, in connection with the completion of their audit of, and the issuance of their report on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2004, identified deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of the Company's internal controls that they considered to be a material weakness in the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls pursuant to standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A significant deficiency is defined as a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, that adversely affects the company's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the company's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than 25

29ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

a remoteRISK likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Our independent registered public accounting firm advised the Audit Committee of the Company's Supervisory Board of the following matter, in July 2004, which they considered to be a material weakness: the Company's internal controls over revenue recognition were not sufficient to ensure transactions were properly recorded in accordance with management's criteria and generally accepted accounting principles. FACTORS

Our ~~independent~~ ~~registered~~business ~~public~~faces ~~accounting~~significant risks. ~~firm~~These ~~discussed~~risks ~~the~~include ~~areas~~those ~~of weakness~~ described ~~above~~below ~~with~~and ~~the~~may ~~Audit~~include ~~Committee.~~additional risks ~~The~~and ~~Audit~~uncertainties ~~Committee~~not ~~took~~presently anknown ~~active role in responding~~ to ~~the deficiencies~~us ~~identified~~or bythat ~~our~~we ~~independent~~currently ~~registered~~believe are ~~public~~immaterial. ~~accountants,~~If ~~including~~any ~~overseeing management's implementation~~ of the ~~remedial~~events ~~measures~~or circumstances described ~~below.~~in ~~To this end, management of~~ the ~~Company~~following ~~worked~~risks ~~with~~occurs, ~~the~~our ~~Audit~~business, ~~Committee~~operating toresults ~~identify~~or ~~and~~financial ~~implement~~condition could ~~any~~be ~~and~~materially ~~all~~adversely ~~corrective~~affected. ~~actions~~These ~~that~~risks ~~were~~should ~~required~~be toread ~~improve the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls, including the~~in ~~enhancement~~conjunction ofwith the ~~Company's~~other ~~systems~~information ~~and~~set ~~procedures.~~forth ~~The~~in ~~Company~~this ~~implemented~~Quarterly ~~the~~Report ~~following~~on ~~measures:~~ Form 10-Q.

~~Management believes~~Risks ~~the~~related ~~above measures have addressed the matter identified by our independent registered public accounting firm as a material weakness. The Audit Committee and the liquidators will continue~~ to ~~monitor~~ the ~~effectiveness~~transaction ofwith ~~the Company's internal controls and procedures including those pertaining to revenue recognition on an ongoing basis and will take further action, as appropriate~~Applied.

~~Limitations~~The ontiming ~~the~~and ~~Effectiveness~~amounts of distributions ~~Controls~~to shareholders cannot be assured.

~~The~~On ~~Company's liquidators~~December 10, do2004 ~~not expect that~~ the ~~Company's~~shareholders ~~disclosure~~of ~~controls and procedures or~~ the Company's ~~internal~~approved ~~controls will prevent all error and all~~the ~~fraud.~~Purchase AAgreement ~~control~~with ~~system~~Applied, nowhereby ~~matter~~we ~~how~~would ~~well~~sell ~~conceived~~to ~~and~~Applied ~~operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that~~ the outstanding ~~objectives~~shares of ~~the~~our ~~control~~worldwide ~~system~~operating ~~are~~subsidiaries ~~met.~~and ~~Further,~~substantially all ~~the design~~ of ~~a control system must reflect~~ the ~~fact~~other ~~that~~assets ~~there~~held ~~are~~at ~~resource constraints, and~~ the ~~benefits~~Nortem ~~of controls must be considered relative to their costs~~N.V. ~~The~~(formerly ~~inherent~~Metron ~~limitations in all control systems~~Technology ~~include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake~~N.V.) ~~Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control~~level. ~~Because~~The oftransaction ~~the~~with ~~inherent~~Applied ~~limitations~~closed inon ~~a cost-effective control system~~December 14, ~~misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected~~2004.

30On March 11, 2005 we made our initial distribution to our shareholders, in the amount of $3.75 per share. We cannot guarantee the amount or timing of any distributions to our shareholders because those determinations depend on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the possibility that the costs, expenses and time involved in satisfying our liabilities and obligations and incurred following the closing of the proposed transaction, including costs and expenses of winding up our business and dissolving, may exceed current expectations. For the foregoing reasons, there can be no assurance as to the amount of any additional distributions to our shareholders.

Risks related ~~PART~~to ~~II.~~our ~~OTHER~~internal ~~INFORMATION~~ controls.

Our ~~ITEM~~internal 1.controls ~~LEGAL~~may ~~PROCEEDINGS~~ not be sufficient to ensure timely and reliable financial information.

~~Not~~In ~~applicable~~response to a letter the Audit Committee of our Supervisory Board received from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls, we believe we took the necessary measures to correct the deficiencies in our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The deficiency identified related to insufficient internal controls over revenue recognition to ensure transactions were properly recorded in accordance with management’s criteria and generally accepted accounted principles.

Working with our Audit Committee, we are continuing the process of identifying and implementing corrective actions where required to improve the ~~ITEM~~design 2and effectiveness of our internal controls, including the enhancement of systems and procedures. ~~UNREGISTERED~~Significant ~~SALES~~additional OFresources ~~EQUITY~~will ~~SECURITIES~~be ~~AND~~required ~~USE~~to OFestablish and ~~PROCEEDS~~ maintain appropriate controls and procedures and to prepare the required financial and other information during this process.

Even after corrective actions had been implemented, the effectiveness ~~ITEM~~of 3.our ~~DEFAULTS~~controls ~~UPON~~and ~~SENIOR~~procedures ~~SECURITIES~~ may be limited by a variety of risks including:

~~Not~~• faulty human judgment and simple errors, ~~applicable.~~omissions or mistakes;

31• collusion of two or more people;

• inappropriate management override of ~~ITEM~~procedures; ~~4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~ and

~~The~~• risk ~~Company~~that ~~held~~enhanced ~~its~~controls and ~~annual~~procedures ~~general~~may ~~meeting~~still ofnot ~~shareholders~~be onadequate ~~December 10,~~to ~~2004.~~assure ~~The~~timely ~~following~~and ~~actions~~reliable financial ~~were voted upon at such meeting:~~ information.

		Affirmative Votes	Negative Votes	Withheld Votes	Abstentions	Broker Non-Votes
1.	Approval of the sale and transfer of substantially all of the Company's stock and assets to Applied Materials, Inc.	9,650,290	7,148	—	7,700	2,349,939
2.	Approval to dissolve and liquidate the Company following the closing of the asset sale and the appointment of Peter Verloop and Charles Roffey as liquidators, their authorization to select a custodial of the books and record and their—and the supervisory board's remuneration	9,643,910	13,528	—	7,700	2,349,939
3.	Approval to amend the Company's articles of association and to designate each of the Company's managing directors and each junior civil law notary working with NautaDutilh N.V. to apply for the declaration referred to in Article 125 of the Netherlands Civil Code, and to have the deed of amendment executed	9,589,059	39,324	—	36,755	2,349,939
4.	Election of five supervisory directors to hold office until 2005:
	Robert R. Anderson	11,985,125	—	29,952	—	—
	Dana C. Ditmore	11,971,125	—	43,952	—	—
	Joel A. Elftmann	11,971,125	—	38,952	—	—
	William L. George	11,971,125	—	43,952	—	—
	Bruce M. Jaffe	11,968,075	—	47,002	—	—
5.	To approve the Company's ability to issue common shares in an aggregate amount exceeding 19.999% of the Company's outstanding shares pursuant to convertible debentures and warrants issued in June 2004	9,496,729	141,513	—	26,896	2,349,939
6.	Adoption of the Company's Annual Accounts for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004	11,986,618	5,324	—	23,135	—
7.	Ratification of the selection of: a) PricewaterhouseCoopers N.V. as statutory auditors of the annual accounts, and b) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent accountants for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005	11,978,143	12,882	—	24,052	—
8.	Authorization of the preparation of the Company's Annual Reports for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 in the English language	11,971,661	7,324	—	36,092	—
9.	To extend the authority of the Supervisory Board to issue shares and exclude pre-emptive rights	6,230,226	3,401,306	—	33,606	2,349,939
10.	Approval of the compensation of the Supervisory Board for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2005	9,515,773	68,108	—	81,257	2,349,939
11.	To adopt the compensation policy for the Company's Managing Board	10,062,802	1,874,984	—	77,291	—
12.	To grant a discharge from liability to the Company's Managing and Supervisory Board members relating to the fiscal year ending May 31, 2004	11,274,883	679,183	—	61,011	—

If we fail to have effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in place, we could be unable to provide timely and reliable financial information.

3226

Risks related ~~ITEM~~to 5.our ~~OTHER INFORMATION~~ business.

~~RISK~~We currently ~~FACTORS~~ do not have any on-going operations, and no sources of revenue.

~~Our~~Upon ~~business~~the ~~faces~~completion ~~significant~~of ~~risks.~~the ~~These~~transaction ~~risks~~with ~~include~~Applied, ~~those~~we ~~described~~no ~~below~~longer ~~and~~have on-going ~~may~~operations ~~include~~and ~~additional~~no ~~risks~~source ~~and~~of ~~uncertainties not~~revenue. ~~presently~~We ~~known~~are toin usthe orprocess ~~that~~of wewinding ~~currently~~down ~~believe~~the ~~are~~business ~~immaterial~~and liquidating the assets. The Ifonly ~~any~~assets ofwe have are the cash ~~events~~and orcash ~~circumstances~~equivalents ~~described~~we inare ~~the~~holding. These ~~following~~assets ~~risks~~will ~~occurs,~~be distributed to our ~~business~~shareholders, ~~operating~~and ~~results~~upon orsuch distribution ~~financial~~we ~~condition could~~will becease ~~materially~~to ~~adversely~~be ~~affected~~in existence. We ~~These~~cannot ~~risks~~guarantee ~~should~~the beamount ~~read~~of inthe ~~conjunction~~assets ~~with~~that ~~the~~will ~~other~~be ~~information~~distributed, nor ~~set~~can ~~forth~~we inspecify ~~this~~when ~~Quarterly~~such ~~Report~~distribution onwill ~~Form 10-Q~~occur.

Risks related to ~~the~~investing ~~transaction~~in ~~with~~our ~~Applied~~common shares.

~~The~~Our shares ~~timing~~have ~~and~~been ~~amounts~~delisted offrom ~~distributions~~The toNasdaq ~~shareholders~~Stock ~~cannot be assured~~Market.

On ~~December~~April 105, ~~2004~~2005 ~~the~~our ~~shareholders~~common ofstock ~~the~~was ~~Company~~delisted ~~approved~~from ~~the~~The ~~Purchase~~Nasdaq Stock ~~Agreement~~Market ~~with Applied~~(“Nasdaq”). Accordingly, there ~~whereby~~is weno ~~would~~public ~~sell~~market tofor ~~Applied~~ the ~~outstanding~~trading ~~shares~~ of our ~~worldwide operating subsidiaries and substantially all of the other assets held at the Nortem N~~shares.~~V. (formerly Metron Technology N.V.) level. The transaction with Applied closed on December 14, 2004.~~

~~We cannot~~Risks ~~guarantee~~related ~~the amount or timing of any distributions~~ to ~~our~~being ~~shareholders because those determinations depend on~~ a ~~variety~~Dutch of factors, including, but not limited to, the possibility that the costs, expenses and time involved in satisfying our liabilities and obligations and incurred following the closing of the proposed transaction, including costs and expenses of winding up our business and dissolving, may exceed current expectations and whether the Company is successful in negotiating a cash prepayment or redemption of the convertible debentures for an amount less than the holders of the convertible debentures would be entitled to receive if such holders converted their debentures into the Company's common sharescompany. ~~For the foregoing reasons, there can be no assurance as to the amount of any distributions to our shareholders.~~

~~Nortem~~ It may ~~agree~~not tobe ~~prepay~~possible ~~or redeem for cash its convertible debentures and~~ to ~~cancel~~enforce ~~outstanding~~United ~~warrants~~States injudgments ~~exchange~~against ~~for a cash payment prior to making any liquidating~~Netherlands ~~distributions~~corporations, todirectors ~~Nortem~~and ~~shareholders~~others.

~~The~~Our ~~holders~~articles ofprovide ~~our~~that ~~convertible debentures will have~~ the ~~right~~Company ~~either~~has totwo ~~convert~~separate ~~their~~boards ~~debentures into our common shares and participate in the liquidating~~of ~~distribution~~directors, ~~or to receive~~ a ~~cash~~Managing ~~payment~~Board ~~calculated~~and ~~under~~a ~~the~~Supervisory ~~debentures~~Board. InA ~~addition,~~significant ~~the holders~~ percentage of our ~~warrants~~assets ~~may~~are ~~exercise~~located ~~their~~outside ~~warrants and receive~~ the ~~same~~United ~~liquidating~~States. ~~distribution~~Furthermore, ~~they would~~judgments ~~have received if they had exercised their warrants as~~ of United ~~the~~States ~~closing~~courts, ofincluding ~~the~~judgments ~~asset~~against ~~sale.~~us, Weour ~~may~~directors ~~offer to prepay~~ or ~~redeem the debentures for a negotiated amount and to cancel the warrants in~~our ~~exchange~~officers ~~for~~predicated aon ~~cash payment. If we prepay or redeem~~ the ~~debentures~~civil orliability ~~cancel~~provisions ~~the warrants in exchange for a cash payment, or if the holders~~ of the ~~debentures~~federal ~~elect to receive a cash payment, the~~securities ~~debentures~~laws ~~may be paid before any liquidating distribution is made to our shareholders. In such an event, the debentures would not be subject to the risk that any~~ of ~~our retained or post-closing liabilities could reduce~~ the ~~amount~~United ~~of funds available for distribution to our shareholders~~States, ~~and~~are ~~this~~not ~~risk~~directly ~~will~~enforceable bein ~~borne~~The ~~entirely by our shareholders~~Netherlands.

~~Risks~~There may ~~related~~me toclaims ~~our~~against ~~internal~~the ~~controls~~Company which are not currently known.

~~Our~~On ~~internal~~March 24, ~~controls~~2005, the Company filed its liquidation accounts and plan of distribution for public inspection with the Dutch Commercial Registry in Arnhem, The Netherlands. Within two months after the date of the filing of the liquidation accounts and plan of distribution, Nortem’s creditors or other entitled parties may file with the court an opposition to Nortem’s liquidation. Nortem may not bemake ~~sufficient~~the final liquidating distribution until such two months have passed and there is no opposition to ~~ensure~~Nortem’s ~~timely~~liquidation. The amount of the final liquidating distribution will depend on a number of factors, including the final amount of its liabilities, costs of operations during the liquidation period, other related costs involved in the wind down and ~~reliable~~liquidation ~~financial~~of ~~information~~Nortem. The timing and amount of the final liquidating distribution will be determined by Nortem’s liquidators in accordance with the plan of distribution.

InITEM response to a letter the Audit Committee of our Supervisory Board received from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal controls, we believe we took the necessary measures to correct the deficiencies in our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting6. The deficiency identified related to insufficient internal controls over revenue recognition to ensure transactions were properly recorded in accordance with management's criteria and generally accepted accounted principles. EXHIBITS

33Exhibits

Working with our Audit Committee, we are continuing the process of identifying and implementing corrective actions where required to improve the design and effectiveness of our internal controls, including the enhancement of systems and procedures. Significant additional resources will be required to establish and maintain appropriate controls and procedures and to prepare the required financial and other information during this process.

2.1(i)		Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Acquisition Sub, Inc. and T.A. Kyser Co., dated June 12, 1998

2.2(ii)		Agreement for the acquisition of the whole of the issued share capital of Shieldcare Limited

2.3(i)		Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization among Metron Technology B.V., Metron Acquisition Sub, Inc. and T.A. Kyser Co., dated July 13, 1998

2.4(i)		Joinder Agreement among certain stockholders of T.A. Kyser Co, Metron Technology B.V. and Metron Acquisition Sub, Inc. dated July 13, 1998

2.5(v)		Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Applied Materials, Inc. and Metron Technology N.V., dated August 16, 2004.

3.1(vi)		Articles of Association of the Registrant and translation thereof.

4.1(i)		Specimen Common Share Certificate

~~Even after corrective actions had been implemented, the effectiveness of our controls and procedures may be limited by a variety of risks including:~~ 27

If we fail to have effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting in place, we could be unable to provide timely and reliable financial information.

4.2(iii)		Form of 8% Convertible Debenture

4.3(iii)		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2003, by and between Metron Technology N.V. and the Purchasers

4.4(iii)		Form of Common Share Warrant issued to the Purchasers

4.5(iv)		Form of 6.5% Convertible Debenture issued to the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated May 26, 2004.

4.6(iv)		Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 16, 2004, by and between Metron Technology N.V. and the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated May 26, 2004.

4.7(iv)		Form of Common Share Warrant issued to the purchasers identified in the Subscription Agreement dated May 26, 2004.

31.1		Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).

32.1•		Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350).

Risks related to our business.

(i)		Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-87665), filed with the Commission on September 23, 1999, as amended through the date hereof.

(ii)		Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 17, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.

(iii)		Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 27, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.

(iv)		Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on August 11, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.

(v)		Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on August 17, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.

(vi)		Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on January 14, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.

•		This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Nortem N.V. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.”

~~We currently do not have any on-going operations, and no sources of revenue.~~ 28

Upon the completion of the transaction with Applied, we no longer have on-going operations and no source of revenue. We are in the process of winding down the business and liquidating the assets. The only assets we have are the cash and cash equivalents we are holding. These assets will be distributed to our shareholders, and upon such distribution we will cease to be in existence. We cannot guarantee the amount of the assets that will be distributed, nor can we specify when such distribution will occur. SIGNATURE

~~Risks~~Pursuant to ~~related~~the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to ~~investing~~be insigned ~~our~~on ~~common~~its ~~shares~~behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Our share price is volatile.

NORTEM N.V.


Date: May 25, 2005	/s/ CHARLES ROFFEY
		Charles Roffey
		Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
		Signing on behalf of the registrant and as principal accounting officer

The trading price of our common shares is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including factors discussed elsewhere in this report and the following: 29

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation may result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business.

Risks related to being a Dutch company.

Our Supervisory Board has the authority to issue shares without shareholder approval, which may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

As a Netherlands "Naamloze Vennootschap," or N.V., we are subject to requirements not generally applicable to corporations organized in United States jurisdictions. Among other things, under Netherlands law, the issuance of shares of an N.V. must be approved by the shareholders unless the shareholders have delegated the authority to issue shares to another corporate body. Our articles of association provide that the shareholders have the authority to resolve to issue shares, common or preferred. The shareholders may designate the Company's Supervisory Board as the corporate body with the authority to adopt any resolution to issue shares, but this designation may not exceed a period of five years. Our articles also provide that as long as the Supervisory Board has the authority to adopt a resolution to issue shares, the shareholders will not have this authority. Pursuant to the Company's articles, the Supervisory Board has the authority to adopt resolutions to issue shares until five years from the November 19, 1999, deed of conversion from a B.V. to an N.V. and the related amendment of our articles of association. This authorization of the Supervisory Board may be renewed by the shareholders from time to time. As a result, our Supervisory Board currently has the authority to issue common and preferred shares without shareholder approval unless such approval is required under the terms of our Nasdaq listing agreement.

It may not be possible to enforce United States judgments against Netherlands corporations, directors and others.

Our articles provide that the Company has two separate boards of directors, a Managing Board and a Supervisory Board. A significant percentage of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, judgments of United States courts, including judgments against us, our directors or our officers predicated on the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States, are not directly enforceable in The Netherlands.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The Company's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 14, 2004, describing and furnishing the press release announcing the Company's earnings for the fiscal first quarter ended August 31, 2004, which press release included the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods.

The Company's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2004, describing that Entegris had notified the Company of Entegris' intent to terminate the Worldwide Stocking Distributor Agreement, between Entegris and the Company, at the end of the current term of the agreement, which term ends on August 31, 2005.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

NORTEM N.V. Date: January 14, 2005 /s/ CHARLES ROFFEY Charles Roffey Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Signing on behalf of the registrant and as principal accounting officer

QuickLinks

Filing Compare · NORTEM, N.V.