UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 000-24207

ABGENIX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		94-3248826
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification number)

6701 Kaiser Drive, Fremont, CA		94555
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

(510) 608-6500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding in 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ý No o

As of July 29, 2005, there were 89,834,537 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.

PART I. Financial Information

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		51

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures		51

PART II. Other Information

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings		52

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		52

ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities		52

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		52

ITEM 5. Other Information		53

ITEM 6. Exhibits		53

SIGNATURES		54

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

ABGENIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

	June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,869		$	148,929
Marketable securities	332,134			267,400
Interest receivable	3,094			2,370
Accounts receivable, net	357			5,729
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	8,725			11,088
Total current assets	390,179			435,516
Property and equipment, net	204,535			223,004
Long-term investments	16,287			23,300
Goodwill	34,780			34,780
Identified intangible assets, net	32,128			60,010
Deposits and other assets	35,073			36,108
	$	712,982		$	812,718

LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	5,461		$	6,635
Deferred revenue	8,900			11,692
Accrued liabilities	14,240			16,622
Accrued restructuring charges	3,637			—
Total current liabilities	32,238			34,949
Deferred rent	7,354			7,519
Convertible notes	463,636			463,630
Non-current portion of accrued restructuring charges	5,576			—
Other long-term liabilities	52,813			25,626
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; Series A-1 50,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference $50,000	49,869			49,869
Commitments
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 220,000,000 shares authorized; 89,782,695 and 89,146,380 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively	9			9
Additional paid-in capital	978,637			973,979
Accumulated other comprehensive income	1,854			9,391
Accumulated deficit	(879,004		)	(752,254		)
Total stockholders’ equity	101,496			231,125
	$	712,982		$	812,718

See accompanying notes

ABGENIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Revenues:
Contract revenue	$	3,403		$	4,189		$	6,061		$	7,079
Contract manufacturing revenue	—			1,325			—			1,325
Total revenues	3,403			5,514			6,061			8,404

Operating expenses:
Cost of goods manufactured	—			1,857			—			1,857
Research and development	35,545			36,148			71,329			64,605
Manufacturing start-up costs	4,807			2,790			6,784			10,136
Amortization of identified intangible assets, related to research and development	1,441			1,791			2,882			3,583
General and administrative	5,264			6,477			10,967			13,365
Impairment of identified intangible assets	25,000			17,241			25,000			17,241
Restructuring and other	14,740			—			14,740			—
Total operating expenses	86,797			66,304			131,702			110,787

Loss from operations	(83,394		)	(60,790		)	(125,641		)	(102,383		)

Other income (expenses):
Interest and other income, net	3,002			1,814			5,958			3,484
Interest expense	(3,725		)	(1,647		)	(7,067		)	(3,290		)
Total other income (expenses)	(723		)	167			(1,109		)	194
Net loss	$	(84,117	)	$	(60,623	)	$	(126,750	)	$	(102,189	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.94	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(1.42	)	$	(1.15	)

Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share	89,658			88,673			89,456			88,490

See accompanying notes

ABGENIX, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004
Operating activities
Net loss	$	(126,750	)	$	(102,189	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Non-cash portion of restructuring and other	5,527			—
Depreciation	14,600			15,422
Amortization of identified intangible assets	2,882			3,583
Impairment of identified intangible assets	25,000			17,241
Amortization of debt issuance costs	1,004			624
Other	117			(2		)
Changes for certain assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable	(724		)	795
Accounts receivable	5,372			398
Inventories	—			(370		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	2,311			3,772
Deposits and other assets	43			(50		)
Accounts payable	(1,174		)	(803		)
Deferred revenue	(2,792		)	(2,777		)
Accrued liabilities	(1,778		)	82
Accrued restructuring charges	9,213			—
Contract cancellation obligation	—			(15,045		)
Deferred rent	504			725
Other long-term liabilities	27,187			3,051
Net cash used in operating activities	(39,458		)	(75,543		)

Investing activities
Purchases of marketable securities	(102,720		)	(110,878		)
Maturities of marketable securities	22,292			37,210
Sales of marketable securities	15,164			140,911
Purchases of property and equipment	(2,264		)	(4,573		)
Sale of equipment	—			3
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(67,528		)	62,673

Financing activities
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock	3,926			3,238
Net cash provided by financing activities	3,926			3,238
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(103,060		)	(9,632		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	148,929			19,141
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	45,869		$	9,509

See accompanying notes

ABGENIX, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2005

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation - The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Abgenix, Inc. (the “Company” or “Abgenix”) included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information or footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles has been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information included therein. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 and accompanying notes included in the Company’s annual report as filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or for any other future period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 will no longer be an alternative. SFAS No. 123(R) does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS No. 123 as originally issued and EITF Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.”

SFAS No. 123(R), which is effective for the Company on January 1, 2006, permits public companies to adopt its requirements using either the modified prospective or modified retrospective transition method. The Company expects to use the modified prospective transition method, which requires that compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted, modified or settled after the effective date as well as for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that remain unvested as of the effective date.

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company currently accounts for its share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method and does not recognize compensation costs for its employee stock options. Accordingly, the Company expects that the adoption of the SFAS No. 123(R) fair value method will have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, although it will have no impact on the Company’s overall financial position. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the impact would approximate the impact of SFAS No. 123 as shown in the table below under the heading of “Stock-Based Compensation.”

Revenue Recognition – The Company receives payments from customers for license, option, service and milestone fees, as well as for contract manufacturing the Company performs. These payments, which are generally non-refundable, are recognized as revenue or reported as deferred revenue until they meet the criteria for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when (1) persuasive evidence of the arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable and (4) the collectibility is reasonably assured, in accordance with

Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. In addition, the Company has followed the following principles in recognizing revenue:

• Abgenix enters into revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables in order to meet its customer’s needs. For example, the arrangements may include a combination of up-front fees, license payments, research services, milestone payments, future royalties and manufacturing arrangements. Multiple element revenue agreements entered into on or after July 1, 2003 are evaluated under Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” to determine whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and whether objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item exists. Deliverables in an arrangement that do not meet the separation criteria in Issue 00-21 must be treated as one unit of accounting for purposes of revenue recognition. Generally, the revenue recognition guidance applicable to the last deliverable is followed for the combined unit of accounting.

• Research and product license fees are recognized only after both the license period has commenced and the technology has been delivered.

• Option fees for granting options to obtain product licenses to develop a product are recognized when the option is exercised or when the option period expires, whichever occurs first. Option fees are paid in cash, are non-refundable, and require the Company to reserve rights to the therapeutic target during the option period for the customer.

• Fees the Company receives for research services the Company performs under its technology out-licensing agreements are generally recognized ratably over the entire period the Company performs these services. Research services include process sciences services the Company performs under its production services agreements, such as cell line development.

• Incentive milestone payments are recognized as revenue when the specified milestone is achieved. Incentive milestone payments are triggered either by the results of the Company’s research efforts or by events external to Abgenix, such as regulatory approval to market a product. Incentive milestone payments are substantially at risk at the inception of the contract, and the values assigned thereto are commensurate with the type of milestone achieved. The Company has no future performance obligations related to an incentive milestone that has been achieved.

• Contract manufacturing fees the Company receives under its production services agreements are recognized when the manufacture of an antibody product candidate is complete, and the antibody product candidate is released and delivered, as defined in the relevant agreement.

Stock-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, the Company does not recognize compensation expense for employee stock options granted at or above fair market value. For purposes of disclosures pursuant to SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the estimated fair value of options is amortized to expense straight-line over the options’ vesting period. The following table illustrates what net loss would have been had the Company accounted for its stock-based awards under the provisions of SFAS No. 123. Pro forma amounts may not be representative of future periods.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net loss	$	(84,117	)	$	(60,623	)	$	(126,750	)	$	(102,189	)
Stock-based employee compensation costs included in the determination of net loss	615			—			615			—
Stock-based employee compensation costs that would have been included in the determination of net loss if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards	(4,469		)	(12,055		)	(8,933		)	(24,410		)
Pro forma net loss as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards	$	(87,971	)	$	(72,678	)	$	(135,068	)	$	(126,599	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share as reported	$	(0.94	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(1.42	)	$	(1.15	)

Pro forma basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.98	)	$	(0.82	)	$	(1.51	)	$	(1.43	)

The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Risk-free interest rate	3.72	%	4.03	%	4.11	%	3.26	%
Dividend yield	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%
Volatility factors of the expected market price of our Common Stock	0.55		0.90		0.55		0.90
Weighted-average expected life of option (years)	4.75		5.67		5.12		5.57

These same assumptions above were also applied in the determination of the option values related to stock options granted to non-employees, except that the term of the consulting contracts (ranging from six months to five years) was used for the expected life of the option. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded an expense of $102,000 related to non-employee stock options, of which $96,000 was included in manufacturing start-up costs and $6,000 in general and administrative expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded an expense of $108,000 related to non-employee stock options, of which $96,000 was included in manufacturing start-up costs and $12,000 in general and administrative expenses. The Company did not incur such expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company also recorded a stock-based compensation expense of $615,000 related to employees that were affected by the restructuring plan described in Note 4 below, and this stock-based compensation expense was included in restructuring and other expenses.

Restructuring Charges – The Company records costs and liabilities associated with exit and disposal activities, as defined in SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” at fair value in the period the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 requires that the estimated future cash flows to be used in the fair value calculation be discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate and that such interest rate shall have a maturity date that approximates the expected timing of future cash flows. Future cash flows related to lease obligations shall include

the effect of sublease rental income and other lease operating expenses. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, changes to a liability are measured using the same credit-adjusted risk-free rate that was applied in the initial period. In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded costs and liabilities in accordance with SFAS No.146 for exit activities related to a restructuring plan described in Note 4 below. The Company will evaluate and adjust the liability on a quarterly basis as appropriate for changes in sublease assumptions due to changes in market conditions.

Net Loss Per Share - Basic net loss per share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. The impact of common stock options, warrants and shares issuable upon the conversion of the convertible notes and the redeemable convertible preferred stock was excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect is antidilutive for the periods presented.

Reclassification – Certain prior year’s balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

2. Comprehensive Loss

The components of comprehensive loss, net of tax, were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Net loss	$	(84,117	)	$	(60,623	)	$	(126,750	)	$	(102,189	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period	3,405			(2,880		)	(7,537		)	(3,985		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(80,712	)	$	(63,503	)	$	(134,287	)	$	(106,174	)

3. Impairment of Identified Intangible Assets

In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, management determined that an impairment of the Company’s acquired Selected Lymphocyte Antibody Method (SLAM) technology had occurred and that the estimated fair value had declined to $2.0 million. This technology, which includes intellectual property, was acquired in 2000 through the acquisition of Abgenix Biopharma Inc., formerly known as ImmGenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company completed a strategic planning process, which included an assessment of its technologies. After assessing the SLAM technology, the Company determined that its use of the SLAM technology had declined and would continue to decline substantially because of significant improvements in the use of other technologies and processes. Because of this impairment indicator, the Company tested the SLAM technology for recoverability and found that the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated from the use of the SLAM technology were less than the carrying value of the SLAM technology. As a result, the Company determined that an impairment of the SLAM technology had occurred and recorded an impairment charge of $23.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 to adjust the carrying value of the SLAM technology to its estimated fair value, which is based on the estimated discounted future cash flows to be generated from the SLAM technology.

In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, management also determined that an impairment of the Company’s acquired technology in the field of intrabodies (antibodies that can access intracellular targets) had occurred and that the estimated value had declined to zero. This technology, which includes intellectual property, was acquired in 2000 through the acquisition of IntraImmune, Inc. The Company decided to discontinue the development of the intrabody program and performed an assessment of the associated patent position and the likelihood of sale or license of the technology to a third party. The

Company determined that the possibility of generating positive future cash flows from the technology was remote. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2005.

In the quarter ended June 30, 2004, management had determined that an impairment of the Company’s acquired technology in the field of catalytic antibodies had occurred and that the estimated value had declined to zero. This technology, which includes intellectual property, was acquired in 2001 through the acquisition of Hesed Biomed, Inc. The Company decided to focus its resources on other research and development projects and wind down its catalytic antibody program. Additionally, after assessing the associated patent position and the likelihood of sale or license of the technology to a third party, management further determined in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 that the possibility of generating positive future cash flows from the technology was remote. As a result of this determination, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $17.2 million in the second quarter of 2004. Intangible assets held and used must be tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. As of December 31, 2004, the Company determined that no changes in circumstances had occurred that would indicate that a further impairment of an intangible asset had occurred.

Identified intangible assets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Gross Assets		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value
As of June 30, 2005:
Acquisition-related developed technology	$	48,590	$	(17,083	)	$	31,507
Other intangible assets	824		(203		)	621
	$	49,414	$	(17,286	)	$	32,128

As of December 31, 2004:
Acquisition-related developed technology	$	85,142	$	(26,264	)	$	58,878
Other intangible assets	1,442		(310		)	1,132
	$	86,584	$	(26,574	)	$	60,010

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets was approximately $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, and $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.

Amortization of other intangible assets was $22,000 and $45,000, respectively, for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

Estimated amortization expense related to identified intangible assets for the six-month period from July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and for each of the fiscal years thereafter is as follows (in thousands):

	Periods Ending December 31,
	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		Thereafter		Total
Acquisition-related	$	1,666	$	3,332	$	3,332	$	3,332	$	3,332	$	16,513	$	31,507
Other	$	25	$	51	$	51	$	51	$	51	$	392	$	621

4. Restructuring and Other

In June 2005, the Company implemented a restructuring plan in which the Company decided to consolidate its research and pre-clinical activities into the Company’s facility located in Burnaby, British Columbia, and reduce its workforce by approximately 15%. As a result of the reduction in workforce and an evaluation of its future needs, the Company determined that it would not occupy and would sublease, to the

extent possible, certain of its research facilities. The restructuring plan was designed to focus resources on the Company’s development pipeline and particularly the potential commercial opportunity of its lead product candidate, panitumumab.

In connection with the restructuring plan, the Company recorded in the second quarter of 2005 total restructuring charges of $14.7 million, including $2.7 million of one-time termination benefits, $6.5 million of lease obligations and $5.6 million for the impairment of leasehold improvements, equipment and other assets. The one-time termination benefits primarily consisted of severance pay and non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. The substantial majority of the severance pay is expected to be paid in full by the end of 2005.

Restructuring charges included lease obligations of $6.5 million, which represented the fair value of future lease commitment costs, net of projected sublease rental income, for the research facilities that the Company decided not to occupy as a result of the restructuring plan. The estimated future cash flows used in the fair value calculation are based on certain estimates and assumptions by management, including the projected sublease rental income, the amount of time the space will be unoccupied prior to sublease and the length of any subleases. The Company has lease obligations related to the facilities subject to its restructuring activities which extend to the year 2014. Management will review the sublease assumptions on a quarterly basis, until the outcome is finalized. Accordingly, management may modify these estimates to reflect any changes in circumstances in future periods.

The Company’s decision to consolidate its research facilities was deemed to be an impairment indicator for its equipment and leasehold improvements under SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” As a result of performing an impairment evaluation, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.6 million to adjust the carrying value of the related long-lived assets to their estimated fair values. The majority of the impairment charge was related to leasehold improvements and the fair value of these leasehold improvements was estimated based upon anticipated future cash flows associated with the related facilities, discounted at an interest rate commensurate with the risks involved. A portion of the impairment charge was also related to certain lab and computer equipment and furniture and fixtures that currently do not have any anticipated future use due to the restructuring plan.

Activities related to the consolidation of the Company’s research facilities under the restructuring plan are expected to continue for the remainder of 2005. The Company may incur additional costs for the transfer or disposal of equipment, facility remediation and employee relocation expenses. These costs will be recorded in the period in which they are incurred in accordance with SFAS No. 146.

The following table is a summary of restructuring activities in the second quarter of 2005 and the liability balance as of June 30, 2005 (in thousands):

	Charges to			Non-Cash			Balance at
	Operations			Charges			June 30, 2005

Termination benefits, including stock-based compensation	$	2,694		$	(615	)	$	2,079
Lease obligations, net	6,464			670			7,134
Impairment of property and equipment	5,582			(5,582		)	—
	$	14,740		$	(5,527	)	$	9,213

			Classified as:
			Short-term liability				$	3,637
			Long-term liability				5,576
							$	9,213

5. Other Long-Term Liabilities

In 2000, the Company entered into a joint development and commercialization agreement with Immunex Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amgen, Inc., for the co-development of ABX-EGF, now known as panitumumab, a fully human antibody created by the Company and directed against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr). The parties amended this agreement in October 2003. Under the amended agreement, Amgen has decision-making authority for development and commercialization activities. As under the original agreement, the Company is obligated to pay 50% of the development and commercialization costs and is entitled to receive 50% of any profits from sales of panitumumab. Under the amended agreement, Amgen is required to make available in 2004 and 2005 up to $60.0 million in advances that the Company may use to fund a portion of its share of development and commercialization costs for panitumumab after the Company has contributed $20.0 million toward development costs in 2004. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had a carrying balance of $52.8 million under this facility consisting of $50.3 million in advances and $2.5 million of interest accrued at the contract rate of 12% per annum. The Company has notified Amgen of its intent to draw a cash advance of an additional $2.7 million subsequent to June 30, 2005. The amount of any such advances, plus interest, may be repaid out of profits resulting from future product sales; however, the Company is generally not obligated to repay any portion of the outstanding balance if panitumumab does not reach commercialization.

6. Segment Information

The operations of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries constitute one business segment.

Information about customers who provided 10% or more of contract revenues for the period is as follows:

Period		Number of Customers and Percentage of Contract Revenues for each of the Customers
Three months ended June 30, 2005		3 customers, 51%, 21% and 16%, respectively
Six months ended June 30, 2005		4 customers, 42%, 25%, 13% and 10%, respectively
Three months ended June 30, 2004		3 customers, 42%, 26% and 24%, respectively
Six months ended June 30, 2004		3 customers, 33%, 30% and 20%, respectively

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the words “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan” and “expect” and similar expressions as they relate to Abgenix are included to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below and under the heading “Risk Factors that Might Affect Future Results”. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, references to “Abgenix,” we,” “us,” and “our” are to Abgenix, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Overview

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to help the reader understand our company.

Our Business

We are a biopharmaceutical company that is focused on the discovery, development and manufacture of human therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of a variety of diseases. We intend to use our proprietary technologies to build a diversified product portfolio that we expect to develop and commercialize internally or through joint development and commercialization arrangements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies.

We are co-developing our most advanced proprietary product candidate, panitumumab, with Immunex Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc. References in this quarterly report to Amgen are both to Amgen and Immunex. Panitumumab is in pivotal trials, and we have another product candidate, ABX-10241, in early stage clinical trials. In addition, we have entered into a variety of contractual arrangements with multiple pharmaceutical, biotechnology and genomics companies to jointly develop and commercialize products or to enable these companies to use our XenoMouse® technology in the development of their products. We may also use our XenoMax® technology on our customer’s behalf. Six of our licensing partners, Pfizer, Inc., Amgen, Chiron Corporation, CuraGen Corporation, Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and Agensys, Inc., have initiated clinical trials or submitted regulatory applications for such trials for antibodies generated from XenoMouse animals. We also use our closely integrated process sciences and manufacturing capabilities for the manufacture of our own proprietary product candidates and also offer these services to our collaborators and others.

We have entered into joint development arrangements with companies such as Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., U3 Pharma AG and Dendreon Corporation, and may enter into additional joint development agreements. We generally expect to self-fund preclinical and certain clinical activities to determine preliminary safety and efficacy before deciding whether to conduct further product development internally or enter into joint development and commercialization agreements. Our strategy is designed to diversify the risks associated with our research and development spending and to continue to focus our activities on product development and commercialization.

We also have a broad collaboration in oncology with AstraZeneca UK Limited. Pursuant to this collaboration we are providing preclinical and clinical research support and process development for therapeutic antibodies against up to 36 targets to be developed by AstraZeneca, and have the opportunity to co-develop therapeutic antibodies against up to 18 additional targets with AstraZeneca. We also may conduct clinical manufacturing, as well as commercial manufacturing during the first five years of commercial sales for products arising out of our collaboration.

Our Financial Position and Liquidity

We derive our revenues from our technology out-licensing contracts and our production services contracts. We expect that unless and until commercialization of panitumumab occurs, substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future will result from payments under these and similar arrangements, our joint development arrangements and our collaboration with AstraZeneca, and payments we receive under these arrangements will continue to be subject to significant fluctuation in both timing and amount.

We have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial expenses in connection with our product development activities, both under contractual arrangements with third parties and related to our independent research and development efforts. Regulatory and business factors will require us to expend substantial funds in the course of completing required additional research, preclinical testing and clinical trials of, and attaining regulatory approvals for, product candidates. The amounts of the expenditures that will be necessary to execute our business plan are subject to numerous uncertainties that may adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources.

We have incurred net losses since we were organized as an independent company, including a net loss of $126.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. We expect to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future as a result of our research and development costs, including costs associated with conducting preclinical development and clinical trials, manufacturing start-up costs and costs associated with preparations for the potential commercialization of panitumumab, including costs associated with co-promotion and other commercial activities, and charges related to purchases of technology or other assets. We expect that the amount of our operating losses will fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

As of June 30, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $378.0 million. We will continue to assess our cash position, and may repurchase a portion of our outstanding convertible subordinated notes due 2007, of which $113.7 million were outstanding at June 30, 2005.

Summary of Product Development

Proprietary Product Development

Two of our antibody therapeutic product candidates are in clinical trials. The following is an overview of these programs.

• Panitumumab (ABX-EGF). Our leading proprietary antibody therapeutic product candidate is panitumumab. Generated using our technology, panitumumab is a fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate directed against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) and a candidate for the potential treatment of a variety of solid tumors. We are co-developing panitumumab with Amgen under a joint development and commercialization agreement described under Summary of Contractual Arrangements below. The status of clinical trials of panitumumab is as follows:

• Colorectal cancer, single agent therapy with panitumumab: Pivotal studies – In January 2004, Amgen initiated two pivotal studies of panitumumab as monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard irinotecan (Camptosar®)- and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®)-containing chemotherapy treatment, one in the United States and one outside the United States. The initiation of the U.S. trial followed the receipt of a Special Protocol Assessment letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, endorsing the design of the trial to support a regulatory submission for potential accelerated approval. Enrollment in this trial, which began in the first quarter of 2004, is proceeding more slowly than originally anticipated. The second pivotal study, a randomized controlled study comparing best supportive care with best supportive care and panitumumab, is being conducted in Europe, Canada and Australia in support of the global registration program. Enrollment in this study is complete and the cut-off point for data

collection has been reached. We do not expect to receive the results of the analysis of this data before the end of the third quarter of 2005. In December 2004, the FDA indicated that data from one pivotal trial, once completed, could be acceptable with additional data from other pending studies to support a submission for marketing approval in the United States. The FDA has granted fast track designation for panitumumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed standard irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy treatment. Fast track designation allows the FDA to accept, on a rolling basis, portions of a marketing application for review prior to the completion of the final registrational package.

• Colorectal cancer, single agent therapy with panitumumab: Phase 2 studies — Amgen is conducting Phase 2 studies evaluating panitumumab as a single agent therapy in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. One Phase 2 clinical trial, which was initiated in December 2001, is closed and treatment is ongoing. Data from this study, which demonstrated single agent antitumor activity and general tolerability of panitumumab in this setting, was reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, or ASCO, in May 2005. Amgen is also conducting a study to evaluate panitumumab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with tumors having low or undetectable levels of EGFr. This trial was initiated in 2004 and enrollment is ongoing.

• Colorectal cancer, combination of panitumumab with chemotherapy — Amgen is conducting a separate Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the effect of panitumumab administered with irinotecan containing regimens as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Enrollment in this trial, which was initiated in January 2002, is closed and treatment is ongoing.

• Colorectal cancer, combination of panitumumab with chemotherapy and other targeted therapy – In April 2005, we and Amgen announced the initiation of a randomized Phase 3 study in the first line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, the “Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation,” or PACCE study. This study evaluates the effect of chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing regimens and bevacizumab (Avastin®), with or without panitumumab. Enrollment in this study is ongoing.

• Non-small cell lung cancer— Amgen is conducting a Phase 2 clinical trial for panitumumab in the first line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer administered with standard chemotherapy, compared to standard chemotherapy alone. Enrollment in this trial, which was initiated in July 2001, is closed and treatment is ongoing. A recently completed primary analysis of this study revealed that when compared with chemotherapy alone, the panitumumab combination did not improve time to disease progression, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints of the study, tumor response rate and overall survival, were not met. The combination of panitumumab and standard chemotherapy was generally well tolerated. Further analysis of the data is ongoing.

• Renal cell cancer—We are conducting a Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the effect of panitumumab as monotherapy in patients with renal cell cancer. Enrollment in this trial, which was initiated in April 2001, is closed and treatment is ongoing.

• Various cancers — We initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for panitumumab in various solid tumors in 1999. In 2003, we expanded enrollment to investigate additional panitumumab dose levels and schedules of administration. Enrollment is closed and treatment is complete. Data from this dose and schedule study were presented at ASCO in May 2005 and showed that panitumumab was generally well tolerated at weekly, every other week and every third week dosing regimens.

• Further development – Additional Phase 1 and 2 clinical studies evaluating panitumumab in different tumor types either as a single agent or in combination with different chemotherapeutic

agents and targeting agents, have been initiated or are expected to be initiated from time to time. For example, an evaluation of panitumumab in combination with chemotherapy and AMG 706, an Amgen proprietary multi-kinase inhibitor, is currently ongoing.

• ABX-10241 (ABX-PTH). Generated using our technology, ABX-10241, or ABX-PTH, is a fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate directed against parathyroid hormone (PTH) for the potential treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. We filed an investigational new drug application, or IND, in December 2003 and initiated a single dose Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of ABX-10241 in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism in February 2004. Preliminary results from an interim analysis of this study were presented at a scientific meeting in 2004. Enrollment in this trial is ongoing. In addition, patient screening has begun for a multiple dose Phase 1 trial of ABX-10241 in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Customer Product Development

We license our XenoMouse technology to pharmaceutical, biotechnology and genomics companies interested in developing antibody-based products. Typically, our agreements with our customers provide for up-front and, upon the occurrence of certain events, milestone payments to us, along with royalty payments to us if the product reaches the market. We do not participate in the development or marketing of these product candidates. Our customers have advanced nine antibodies generated with XenoMouse technology into the clinical phase as follows:

• Pfizer—We generated three XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidates that Pfizer has advanced into clinical trials, including one that targets cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and one that targets the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R). The target for the third product candidate has not been disclosed. Two of the product candidates are currently in Phase 1 evaluation and one has advanced to Phase 2 evaluation.

• Amgen—We generated a XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate that Amgen has advanced into a pivotal trial as AMG 162 as a potential treatment for bone loss. Amgen has advanced an additional XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate to an undisclosed target to Phase 1 clinical trials.

• Chiron–We generated a XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate that binds to and neutralizes CD40, a receptor expressed on immune cells. Chiron has advanced this candidate, CHIR-12.12, into a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with B cell malignancies.

• CuraGen–We generated a XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate that binds to platelet derived growth factor D (PDGF-D) that CuraGen has advanced to Phase 1 clinical trials as CR002 as a potential treatment for inflammatory kidney disease.

• Human Genome Sciences—CCR5 mAb is a XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate that binds to the chemokine receptor CCR5 that allows entry of the HIV-1 virus into immune cells. Human Genome Sciences has initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial of CCR5 mAb in patients infected with HIV-1.

• Agensys– AGS-PSCA is a XenoMouse-derived fully human antibody therapeutic product candidate that selectively binds to prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA). Agensys has filed an IND to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of this candidate in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Summary of Contractual Arrangements

Overview

We have entered into a variety of contractual arrangements to use our XenoMouse and XenoMax technologies to generate and/or develop fully human antibodies against numerous antigens or to manufacture fully human antibodies. The following is a summary of these relationships.

Amgen Collaboration

In 2000, we entered into a joint development and commercialization agreement with Immunex, now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amgen, for the co-development of ABX-EGF, now known as panitumumab. We amended this agreement in October 2003. Under the amended agreement, Amgen has decision-making authority for development and commercialization activities and we have the right to co-promote panitumumab in the United States. We have decided to pursue the co-promotion of panitumumab with Amgen in the United States. We are obligated to pay 50% of the development and commercialization costs and we are entitled to receive 50% of any profits from sales of panitumumab. In addition, Amgen is required to make available in 2004 and 2005 up to $60.0 million in advances that we may use to fund a portion of our share of development and commercialization costs for panitumumab. The amount of any such advances, plus interest, may be repaid out of profits resulting from future product sales; however, we are generally not obligated to repay any portion of the outstanding balance if panitumumab does not reach commercialization. Under a separate agreement with Amgen, we are manufacturing clinical supplies of panitumumab for the collaboration and will manufacture commercial supplies for the first five years after commercial launch, with Amgen’s support and assistance. The costs of manufacturing clinical and commercial supplies are also shared equally.

AstraZeneca Collaboration

We entered into a collaboration and license agreement with AstraZeneca in October 2003 for the discovery, development and commercialization of fully human monoclonal antibodies to treat cancer. This alliance involves the joint discovery and development of therapeutic antibodies for up to 36 cancer targets to be commercialized worldwide by AstraZeneca exclusively. We will conduct early stage preclinical research on behalf of AstraZeneca with respect to some or all of these targets, and have initiated research programs for numerous targets. To date, we and AstraZeneca have selected 22 targets for inclusion in the collaboration, including several for which we had pre-existing preclinical programs. For any resulting products, we may receive milestone payments at various stages of development and royalties on future product sales. AstraZeneca may make milestone payments to us of up to $51 million per candidate that is developed under the agreement, and for any antibody we choose to develop to a target that is discontinued from the collaboration, we may pay AstraZeneca up to $15 million. In addition, we may conduct early clinical trials, process development and clinical manufacturing, as well as commercial manufacturing during the first five years of commercial sales, and would be compensated for those activities at competitive market rates. The collaboration also gives us the right to select and develop an additional pool of antibodies against up to 18 targets, which the companies may elect to further codevelop on an equal cost and profit sharing basis. Subject to a number of exceptions, we will work exclusively with AstraZeneca to generate and develop antibodies for therapeutic use in the field of oncology during a three-year target selection period. These exceptions include, among others, work on antibodies directed at antigens that are or become subject to existing collaborations and antigens that we and AstraZeneca decide not to pursue in the collaboration, and certain process development and manufacturing services. In connection with this collaboration, AstraZeneca made a $100.0 million investment in Abgenix securities. Upon the achievement of certain milestones, we may also require AstraZeneca to invest up to an additional $60.0 million in our convertible preferred stock.

Joint Development Collaborations

We have entered into joint development and commercialization arrangements for the development of fully human antibody therapeutic products with a number of collaborators, including U3 Pharma, Microscience, Sosei, Dendreon and Chugai. Development activities under these agreements are in various early stages. Pursuant to these arrangements we and our collaborators typically share equally the costs of development and commercialization as well as any profits from the collaboration. We intend to enter into additional joint development agreements for other product candidates.

Technology Out-Licensing

We have licensed our XenoMouse technology to third parties for the purpose of generating antibody product candidates to one or more specific antigens provided by the customer. We may also use our XenoMax technology on the customer’s behalf. Pursuant to these contracts, we and our customers intend to generate antibodies for development as product candidates for the treatment of cancer, inflammation, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular disease, neurological diseases, metabolic diseases and infectious diseases, and other diseases. The customer generally has an option for a period of time to acquire a product license for any antibody identified using XenoMouse technology that the customer wishes to develop and commercialize. The financial terms of these agreements may include license fees, option fees and milestone payments paid to us by the customers. Based on our agreements, these payments and fees would average from approximately $7.0 million to $10.0 million per antigen if our customer takes the antibody into development and ultimately to commercialization. Generally, under these agreements, our collaborators are responsible for the costs of product development, manufacturing and commercialization. Additionally, these license agreements entitle us to receive royalties on any future product sales by the customer.

Production Services

We have entered into a limited number of contracts for process sciences and manufacturing services. We may offer a variety of process development, cell banking and clinical and commercial scale manufacturing services for antibody product candidates to existing and new customers to absorb production services capacity we are not using for our proprietary product candidates. Pursuant to such arrangements we may receive fees and, in some circumstances, royalties from future product sales. We continue to assess opportunities and may enter into additional production service contracts.

Results of Operations

Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

Contract Revenues.

Contract revenues totaled $3.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $4.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, in the comparable 2004 periods. Because contract revenues depend to a large extent on the success or failure of research and development efforts undertaken by our collaborators and licensees, our period-to-period contract revenues can fluctuate significantly and are inherently difficult to predict.

The primary components of contract revenues for both periods were as follows:

• Technology Licensing

We recognized a total of $3.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $3.6 million and $6.0 million, respectively, in the comparable 2004 periods, from licensing our proprietary technologies. Revenues in these

periods consisted primarily of various fees, such as research license and service fees, product license fees, product development and research milestone payments and option fees, under agreements related to the licensing of our XenoMouse technology. These revenues were generated from several collaborators, but primarily from Pfizer, Amgen and Genentech in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and from Abbott, Pfizer, and CuraGen in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.

• Production Services

We recognized no revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and approximately $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 for production services. These revenues consisted primarily of process sciences services and were generated from a customer under a production services agreement.

Contract Manufacturing Revenues.

In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we did not recognize any revenues from manufacturing services. Contract manufacturing revenues totaled $1.3 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and were related to the manufacture of an antibody product for a customer under a production services agreement.

Cost of Goods Manufactured.

Costs incurred by the Company for contract manufacturing pursuant to production service contracts are reported as cost of goods manufactured. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we did not manufacture any products under a production services agreement and, therefore, did not incur any cost of goods manufactured. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we incurred $1.9 million in cost of goods manufactured associated with manufacturing an antibody product for a customer under a production services agreement. Cost of goods manufactured included material, direct labor, outside testing and overhead costs associated with manufacturing an antibody product for a customer under a production services agreement.

Research and Development Expenses.

Research and development expenses were $35.5 million and $71.3 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $36.1 million and $64.6 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. The major components of research and development expenses were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Product development	$	27,946	$	26,087	$	55,448	$	45,365
Research	7,599		10,061		15,881		19,240
Total	$	35,545	$	36,148	$	71,329	$	64,605

Product development costs include costs of preclinical development, cell line development and conducting clinical trials for our proprietary product candidates. Product development costs relate both to programs we are developing jointly with collaborators pursuant to joint development arrangements and to

programs that we are developing independently. The costs of our joint development programs represented the majority of our product development costs in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. Product development costs also include costs related to cell line development in connection with production services arrangements. Typically, our joint development arrangements provide that we and our collaborator share the costs of development and commercialization. We bear the entire cost of programs we are developing independently. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, our product development costs increased in comparison to the same periods in 2004, primarily due to a significant increase in costs associated with our joint development programs, the substantial majority of which was related to the panitumumab program. To a lesser extent, the increase was due to an increase in product development costs related to one of our independent programs, ABX-10241. The increases were partially offset by a decrease in product development costs in 2005 related to cell line development activities we performed under a production services contract.

The increase in product development costs for the panitumumab program in 2005 from 2004 was primarily attributed to an increase in the amount we reimbursed our joint development partner, Amgen. Under the joint development and commercialization agreement with Amgen, we are obligated to pay 50% of the total development and commercialization costs of panitumumab. We reimburse Amgen when we incur less than 50% of the total development costs incurred by both parties in the given period. In a period where we incur more than 50% of the total development costs, we would record such excess amount, which would be reimbursed to us by Amgen, as a reduction of our product development costs. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the amount of our reimbursement to Amgen was $6.7 million and $12.4 million, respectively, compared to $3.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. The increase in our reimbursements to Amgen in 2005 from 2004 reflected an increase in development activities performed by Amgen for panitumumab. Partially offsetting the increase in product development costs for panitumumab was a decrease in clinical research fees in 2005 from 2004 due to the completion of patient enrollment for all panitumumab clinical trials that we manage. Clinical research fees consist of clinical investigator site fees, monitoring costs and data management costs.

Product development costs for ABX-10241 increased by $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to the same periods in 2004. The increase in 2005 from 2004 was primarily due to increased spending in clinical research fees for the single dose Phase 1 clinical trial, of which patient enrollment is ongoing, and in preparation for a multiple dose Phase 1 study, of which patient screening has been initiated.

Product development costs can vary significantly from period to period depending on the progress of the development activities in the period. Overall, we expect costs associated with product development in 2005 to be higher than 2004 as we and Amgen continue to expand our development efforts on the panitumumab program. In addition, we expect product development costs related to ABX-10241 to increase in 2005 compared to 2004.

Research costs include costs associated with research and testing of antibodies we generate, whether for ourselves or for our customers, prior to the development stage which begins with the commencement of preclinical activities. Research costs also include the costs of research relating to proprietary technologies, including enhancements to those technologies. The decrease in research costs in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily due to a reduction in costs associated with licensing charges from arrangements with research institutions and others, as well as decreased spending in lab supplies and reduced depreciation expense.

Manufacturing Start-Up Costs.

Manufacturing start-up costs were $4.8 million and $6.8 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $2.8 million and $10.1 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. Manufacturing start-up costs include certain costs associated with our new manufacturing facility, including depreciation, outside contractor costs and personnel costs for activities

such as quality assurance and quality control. The increase in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily due to an increase in personnel in production services in preparing for the possible submission of Biologic License Application, or BLA, for panitumumab. The decrease in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily due to the increased use of our manufacturing facility for the manufacture of panitumumab and other development activities, including process validation and the manufacture of our conformance lots. Manufacturing start-up costs will fluctuate from period to period depending on the level of these manufacturing and development activities.

Amortization of Identified Intangible Assets.

Our identified intangible assets consist primarily of existing technology (including patents and certain royalty rights) we acquired through the acquisitions of Hesed Biomed in 2001, Abgenix Biopharma Inc., formerly known as ImmGenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and IntraImmune in 2000, and JT America’s interest in Xenotech in 1999. Amortization of intangible assets totaled $1.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. The decrease in 2005 from 2004 was due to a reduction in intangible assets due to the write-off in the second quarter of 2004 of the remaining value of the catalytic antibody technology that we acquired through the acquisition of Hesed Biomed. We expect the amortization of intangible assets to further decrease in future periods as we recorded impairment charges for certain intangible assets in the second quarter of 2005.

General and Administrative Expenses.

General and administrative expenses include compensation, professional services, consulting and other expenses related to information systems, legal, finance and an allocation of facility costs. General and administrative expenses totaled $5.3 million and $11.0 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $6.5 million and $13.4 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. The decrease in 2005 from 2004 was primarily due to a reduction in legal, consulting and temporary personnel expenses.

Impairment of Intangible Assets.

Impairment of intangible assets totaled $25.0 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $17.2 million in the same periods in 2004.

In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we determined that an impairment of our Selected Lymphocyte Antibody Method (SLAM) technology had occurred and that the estimated fair value had declined to $2.0 million. This technology, which includes intellectual property, was acquired in 2000 through the acquisition of Abgenix Biopharma, Inc., formerly known as ImmGenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In the second quarter of 2005, we completed a strategic review process, which included an assessment of our technologies. After assessing the SLAM technology, we determined that our use of the SLAM technology had declined and would continue to decline substantially because of significant improvements in the use of other technologies and processes. Because of this impairment indicator, we tested the SLAM technology for recoverability and found that the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated from the use of the SLAM technology were less than the carrying value of the SLAM technology. As a result, we determined that an impairment of the SLAM technology had occurred and recorded an impairment charge of $23.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 to adjust the carrying value of SLAM technology to its estimated fair value, which is based on the estimated discounted future cash flows to be generated from the SLAM technology.

Also in the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we determined that an impairment of the acquired technology in the field of intrabodies (antibodies that can access intracellular targets) had occurred and that the estimated value had declined to zero. This technology, which includes intellectual property, was

acquired in 2000 through the acquisition of IntraImmune, Inc. We decided to discontinue the development of the intrabody program and performed an assessment of the associated patent position and the likelihood of sale or license of the technology to a third party. We determined that the possibility of generating positive future cash flows from the technology was remote. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2005.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we had determined that an impairment of the Company’s acquired technology in the field of catalytic antibodies had occurred and that the estimated value had declined to zero. This technology, which includes intellectual property, was acquired in 2001 through the acquisition of Hesed Biomed, Inc. We decided to focus our resources on other research and development projects and wind down our catalytic antibody program. Additionally, after assessing the associated patent position and the likelihood of sale or license of the technology to a third party, we further determined in the three months ended June 30, 2004 that the possibility of generating positive future cash flows from the technology was remote. As a result of this determination, we recorded an impairment charge of $17.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

Restructuring and Other.

In June 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan in which we decided to consolidate our research and pre-clinical activities into the facility located in Burnaby, British Columbia, and reduce our workforce by approximately 15%. As a result of the reduction in workforce and an evaluation of our future needs, we determined that we would not occupy and would sublease, to the extent possible, certain of our research facilities. The restructuring plan was designed to focus resources on our development pipeline and particularly the potential commercial opportunity of our lead product candidate, panitumumab.

In connection with the restructuring plan, we recorded in the second quarter of 2005 total restructuring charges of $14.7 million, including $2.7 million of one-time termination benefits, $6.5 million of lease obligations and $5.6 million for the impairment of leasehold improvements, equipment and other assets. The one-time termination benefits primarily consisted of severance pay and non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. The substantial majority of the severance pay is expected to be paid in full by the end of 2005.

The $6.5 million of lease obligations represented the fair value of future lease commitment costs, net of projected sublease rental income, for the research facilities that we decided not to occupy as a result of the restructuring plan. Additionally, we recorded an impairment charge of $5.6 million to adjust the carrying value of the related long-lived assets to their estimated fair values based on our impairment evaluation in connection with the restructuring. The majority of the impairment charge was related to leasehold improvements, and the fair value of these leasehold improvements was estimated based upon anticipated future cash flows associated with the related facilities, discounted at an interest rate commensurate with the risks involved. A portion of the impairment charge was also related to certain lab and computer equipment and furniture and fixtures that currently do not have any anticipated future use due to the restructuring plan.

Activities related to the consolidation of our research facilities under the restructuring plan are expected to continue for the remainder of 2005. We may incur additional costs for the transfer or disposal of equipment, facility remediation and employee relocation expenses. These costs will be recorded in the period in which they are incurred in accordance with SFAS No. 146.

As a result of the restructuring, we expect that certain research and development expenses, including compensation, facilities and depreciation of property and equipment, will be lower than the current rate of spending starting in the third quarter of 2005. Compared to the amounts incurred in the first half of 2005, we expect these expenses to decrease by approximately $5 million in total in the second half of 2005. However, we also expect that the decrease in these expenses will be offset by an anticipated increase in product development expenses for the remainder of 2005, in particular joint development expenses as discussed above.

Interest and Other Income, Net.

Interest and other income, net, consist primarily of interest from cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Interest and other income, net, increased to $3.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $1.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. The increase was primarily the result of higher interest rates and higher average balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

Interest Expense.

Interest expense was primarily related to interest and amortization of issuance costs on our convertible notes and interest on the Amgen credit facility. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, interest expense increased to $3.7 million and $7.1 million, respectively, as compared to $1.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. The increase in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004 was primarily due to the interest related to the convertible senior notes due 2011 and the interest related to the credit facility with Amgen which was not available for advances in the first six months of 2004. A portion of the increase was offset by the reduction of interest related to the convertible subordinated notes due 2007, as $86.3 million principal amount of these notes was repurchased in December 2004. Interest expense of $0.3 and $0.5 million, respectively, was capitalized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004. In December 2004, we issued $300.0 million of convertible senior notes due 2011, which accrue interest at an annual rate of 1.75% payable semi-annually. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded an interest expense of $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to the convertible senior notes due 2011 and an interest expense of $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, related to the convertible subordinated notes due 2007. For each future quarterly period through March 2007, we expect to record approximately $2.3 million in interest expense related to our convertible notes, assuming that the outstanding principal amount remains unchanged at $113.8 million. We record interest at 12% on the amounts we draw on our credit facility with Amgen until we repay the balance in full. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the amount of interest recorded under the Amgen arrangement was $1.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The amount of any such advances, plus interest, may be repaid out of profits from future product sales; however, we are generally not obligated to repay any portion of the outstanding balance if panitumumab does not reach commercialization.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $378.0 million. We invest our cash equivalents and marketable securities primarily in highly liquid, interest bearing, investment grade and government securities in order to preserve principal. We have also invested in certain marketable equity securities of ImmunoGen and CuraGen for strategic reasons. These securities had an aggregate fair value of $16.3 million at June 30, 2005. We will continue to assess our cash position, and may repurchase a portion of our outstanding convertible subordinated notes due 2007.

Cash Used in Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities was $39.5 million and $75.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The major components of the changes in cash used in operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to the same period in 2004, were primarily the following:

• An increase of $24.1 million in our liability to Amgen under our joint development collaboration for panitumumab.

• Payments of approximately $14.0 million on the Lonza contract cancellation obligation in the first six months of 2004. This obligation was settled in the third quarter of 2004.

• An increase of $3.9 million in research and development and manufacturing start-up costs, not including the Lonza contract cancellation charge, amortization of identified intangible assets and depreciation related to the development of new products.

• An increase of $2.6 million in customer payments due primarily to the timing of payments received under our contracts.

• A decrease of $2.2 million in the change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, net.

Cash Used in and Provided by Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $67.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $62.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net cash used in and provided by investing activities primarily consisted of the following:

• Capital expenditures of $2.3 million and $4.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Capital expenditures in both 2005 and 2004 primarily consisted of investments in construction in progress and equipment for our manufacturing facility and investments in lab equipment and software.

• Purchases, net of maturities and sales, of marketable securities of $65.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to maturities and sales, net of purchases, of marketable securities of $67.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, net cash provided by financing activities was $3.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, consisting of the following:

• $1.7 million from the issuance of common stock in connection with an extension of a technology licensing agreement by Genentech in the first quarter of 2005.

• $2.2 million and $3.2 million from the issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options and under our employee stock purchase plan in the first six months of 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Financing Uncertainties Related to Our Business Plan. We plan to continue to make significant expenditures to staff and operate our own manufacturing facility and support our research and development activities, including preclinical product development and clinical trials. We also intend to look for opportunities to acquire new technology through in-licensing, collaborations or acquisitions. We may spend additional amounts to support new production services contracts.

We currently intend to use our available cash on hand to finance these projects and business developments, but we might also pursue other financing alternatives, such as equity, equity-linked debt or debt financing, a bank line of credit, sale-lease back financing, asset sales, funding by one or more collaborators or a mortgage financing, that may become available to us. We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a currently effective shelf registration through which we may offer for sale from time to time up to $250 million in equity or debt securities. Whether we use cash on hand or choose to obtain financing will depend on, among other things, the future success of our business, the prevailing interest rate environment and the condition of financial markets generally.

In October 2003, we entered into an amendment of our joint development and commercialization agreement with Amgen for the co-development of panitumumab. Under the agreement, Amgen is obligated to make available in 2004 and 2005 up to $60.0 million in advances that we may use to fund a portion of our share of development and commercialization costs after we have contributed $20.0 million toward development costs in 2004. As of June 30, 2005, we had a carrying balance of $52.8 million, which consisted of $50.3 million in advances and $2.5 million of accrued interest, and expect to draw an additional $2.7 million under this facility in August 2005. We expect to continue to make use of this credit facility in 2005 up to the $60.0 million limit.

The amounts of the expenditures that will be necessary to execute our business plan are subject to numerous uncertainties that may adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources to a significant extent. As of June 30, 2005, two of our proprietary product candidates, panitumumab and ABX-10241 were in various stages of clinical trials. The clinical trials of panitumumab and ABX-10241 are expected to require significant expenditures in the foreseeable future. Completion of clinical trials may take several years or more, but the length of time generally varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a product candidate. We estimate that clinical trials of the type we generally conduct are typically completed over the following timelines:

Clinical Phase		Estimated Completion Period

Phase 1		1-2 Years
Phase 2		1-2 Years
Phase 3		2-4 Years

Completion of clinical trials may take several years or more. The length of time generally varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of the product candidate. The duration and the cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project.

We test our potential product candidates in numerous preclinical studies to identify disease indications for possible therapeutic application. We may conduct multiple clinical trials on our own or with our collaborators to cover a variety of indications for each product candidate. As we obtain results from trials, we may elect to discontinue clinical trials for certain product candidates or for one or more indications for a given product candidate in order to focus our resources on more promising product candidates or indications.

An important element of our business strategy is to pursue the research and development of a diverse range of product candidates for a variety of disease indications. We may enter joint development agreements, similar to our agreement with Amgen for panitumumab, and may enter into additional joint development agreements earlier in the development life cycle of product candidates. We have begun to implement our collaboration strategy through co-development arrangements with companies such as Chugai, U3, Microscience, Sosei and Dendreon. Our strategy is designed to diversify the risks associated with our research and development spending.

Our proprietary product candidates also have not yet achieved FDA regulatory approval, which is required before we can market them as therapeutic products. In order to proceed to subsequent clinical trial stages and to ultimately achieve regulatory approval, the FDA must conclude that our clinical data establish safety and efficacy. The number, size and type of clinical trials we conduct for a particular product candidate are also affected by the policies of the FDA and European regulatory agencies regarding the availability of possible expedited approval procedures, which we may seek to utilize. These policies may change from time to time.

Furthermore, our business strategy includes the option of entering into arrangements with third parties to collaborate in the development and commercialization of our products. In the event that third

parties take over the clinical trial process for one of our product candidates, the estimated completion date would largely be under the control of that third party rather than us. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which proprietary products or indications, if any, will be subject to future collaborative arrangements, in whole or in part, or the extent to which third parties may control clinical trials pursuant to such arrangements, and how such arrangements would affect our capital requirements.

As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, among others, the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects are difficult to estimate and are subject to considerable variation. Our inability to complete our research and development projects in a timely manner or our failure to enter into collaborative agreements when appropriate, could significantly increase our capital requirements and could adversely impact our liquidity. These uncertainties could force us to seek additional sources of financing from time to time in order to continue with our business strategy. Our inability to raise additional capital, or to do so on terms reasonably acceptable to us, would jeopardize the future success of our business.

We also may be required to make further substantial expenditures if unforeseen difficulties arise in other parts of our business.

We believe that our current cash balances, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and the cash generated from our licensing and other agreements will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital requirements for at least one year. However, because of the uncertainties in our business discussed above, among others, we cannot assure you that this will be the case. In addition, we may choose to, or prevailing business conditions may require us to, obtain additional financing from time to time. We may choose to raise additional funds through public or private financing, licensing and other agreements or other arrangements. We cannot be sure that any additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Furthermore, any additional equity or equity-related financing may be dilutive to our stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may subject us to restrictive covenants. We may also choose to obtain funding through collaborations, licensing and other contractual arrangements. Such agreements may require us to relinquish our rights to certain of our technologies, products or marketing territories. Our failure to raise capital when needed would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

History of Net Losses. We have incurred net losses since our organization as an independent company, including in the last five years net losses of $8.8 million in 2000, $60.9 million in 2001, $208.9 million in 2002, $196.4 million in 2003 and $187.5 million in 2004, and $126.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, our accumulated deficit was $879.0 million. Our losses to date have resulted principally from:

• research and development costs relating to the development of our XenoMouse and XenoMax technologies and antibody therapeutic product candidates;

• manufacturing start-up costs relating to our new manufacturing facility including depreciation, costs of outside contractors and personnel for quality assurance and quality control activities;

• general and administrative costs relating to our operations;

• impairment charges relating to our strategic investments in CuraGen, ImmunoGen and MDS Proteomics; and

• impairment charges relating to acquired technologies, including our SLAM technology and technologies in the fields of intrabodies and catalytic antibodies.

We expect to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future as a result of our research and development costs, including costs associated with conducting preclinical development and clinical trials, which will continue to be substantial, charges related to purchases of technology or other assets, and costs associated with establishing and operating our manufacturing facilities. We intend to invest significantly in our products prior to entering into licensing agreements. This will increase our need for capital and will result in losses for at least the next several years. We expect that the amount of operating losses will fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of increases or decreases in our research and development efforts, the execution or termination of licensing and other agreements, and the initiation, and success or failure, of clinical trials.

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards. As of December 31, 2004, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $670.0 million and $194.0 million, respectively. Our net operating loss carryforwards exclude losses incurred prior to our formation in July 1996. Further, we have capitalized the amounts associated with the 1997 patent cross-license and settlement agreement with GenPharm, which we have expensed for financial statement accounting purposes and we are amortizing those amounts over a period of approximately 15 years for tax purposes. The federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards will expire in the years 2006 through 2024, if not utilized. Utilization of the net operating losses and credits may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits before utilization.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Several estimates and judgments involved in the application of accounting principles impact the financial results that we report. We are required to estimate the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Changes in our estimates or judgments could materially impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in future years. We believe our most critical accounting estimates include revenue recognition, accounting for equity investments, goodwill and identified intangible assets, restructuring charges, income taxes and stock option valuation.

Revenue Recognition

We derive our contract revenue from license, option, service and milestone fees received from customers. Services include those performed under our technology out-licensing and production services agreements. As described below, within the framework of generally accepted accounting principles, significant management judgments and estimates must be made and applied in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. If our management made different judgments or utilized different estimates, material differences could result in the amount and timing of our revenue in any period.

We enter into revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables in order to meet our customer’s needs. For example, the arrangements may include a combination of up-front fees, license payments, research and development services, milestone payments, future royalties, and manufacturing arrangements. Multiple element revenue agreements entered into on or after July 1, 2003 are evaluated under Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” or EITF 00-21, to determine whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and whether objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item exists. Deliverables in an arrangement that do not meet the separation criteria in EITF 00-21 must be treated as one unit of accounting for purposes of revenue recognition. Generally, the revenue recognition guidance applicable to the final deliverable is followed for the combined unit of accounting. For certain arrangements, the period of time over which certain deliverables will be provided is not contractually defined. Accordingly, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. For example, during the three and six months ended

June 30, 2005, we recognized revenue of approximately $83,000 and $198,000, respectively, related to arrangements for which the period of time over which the research will be performed was not contractually defined. For these arrangements, we are amortizing up-front fees over the 15- to 20-month period of time defined in the research plan established by us and our customer. As of June 30, 2005, approximately $47,000 remained in deferred revenue related to these arrangements. In addition, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we recognized revenue of approximately $174,000 and $349,000, respectively, related to an arrangement for which the period of time of continuing obligation is dependent upon the timing of product commercialization. The length of time necessary to complete preclinical and clinical testing, and to obtain marketing approval to commercialize a product, varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of the product candidate, and many factors may delay commercialization. If the date of the product commercialization is delayed by one year, the amount of revenue recognized in 2005 would be approximately $0.6 million, as opposed to $0.7 million under our current estimate. As of June 30, 2005, approximately $3.8 million remained in deferred revenue related to this arrangement. To date, there has not been a change in an estimate or assumption in the past that had a material impact on revenue recognition.

Accounting for Equity Investments

Unrealized holding gains and losses related to our marketable equity investments are reported as a component of stockholders’ equity. We recognize an impairment charge when the declines in the fair values of these investments below their cost basis are deemed to be other-than-temporary. We consider various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis, the current financial condition of the investee and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Accounting for Goodwill and Identified Intangible Assets

As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” in 2002, we no longer amortize goodwill but instead review goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or sooner if indications of impairment exist. Under our accounting policy, we have adopted the beginning of the fourth quarter as an annual goodwill impairment test date. Following this approach, we compare the carrying values available as of September 30 with the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to assess if there has been a potential impairment, and, if impairment is indicated, complete the measurement of impairment under the procedures established by SFAS 142. Because we have determined that we have one reporting unit under SFAS No. 142, our market capitalization is considered to be a reasonable proxy for the fair value of the reporting unit. We also consider whether current business and general market conditions suggest that the fair value of the reporting unit has likely declined below its carrying value. As of June 30, 2005, no impairment has occurred.

If we were to determine in a future period that an impairment of goodwill existed, the impairment measurement procedures could result in a charge for the impairment of goodwill. Furthermore, a change in our determination of reporting units could result in a charge for the impairment of goodwill in future periods. A change in the determination of reporting units could occur should we reorganize into reporting units such that each unit constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available that is regularly reviewed by management to evaluate the performance of that unit. As of June 30, 2005, the carrying value of our goodwill was $34.8 million.

Under SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” identified intangible assets held and used must be tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount is determined to be not recoverable when the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset is less than the carrying amount. Factors that are considered important in determining whether impairment might exist include a significant change in the

manner in which an asset is being used, a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or a current expectation that, more likely that not, an asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. If it is determined that an impairment indicator exists and the asset is not recoverable, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset.

In the second quarter of 2005, we determined that impairment indicators existed with respect to our SLAM and intrabody technologies. We then estimated the undiscounted future cash flows from the use of the SLAM technology and found that the carrying value was not recoverable. Because neither quoted market prices or comparables were available, we estimated the fair value of the SLAM technology based on the net present value of its future cash flows, or $2.0 million. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $23.1 million. Future cash flows associated with the SLAM technology are estimated based on future cost savings from using the SLAM technology. Significant assumptions used in this estimate include the number of programs that would use the SLAM technology, cost savings per each program, the life of the SLAM technology, the discount rate and the income tax effect. If one or more of these assumptions changes significantly in a future period and it is determined at that time that the carrying value of the SLAM technology is not recoverable, further impairment charge may be recognized. Because future cash flows estimated to be generated from the intrabody technology were determined to be remote, the fair value was determined to be zero and the remaining carrying value of $1.9 million was written off.

In the second quarter of 2004, we determined that an impairment of our catalytic antibody technology had occurred. Because future cash flows estimated to be generated from the catalytic antibody technology were determined to be remote, the fair value was determined to be zero, and the remaining carrying value of $17.2 million was written off.

If we were to determine in a future period that an impairment of intangible assets has occurred, the impairment measurement procedures could result in a charge for the impairment of long-lived assets. As of June 30, 2005, the carrying value of our identified intangible assets was $32.1 million, consisting primarily of the XenoMouse technology.

Restructuring Charges

In June 2005, we implemented a restructuring plan in which we decided to consolidate our research and pre-clinical activities into our facility located in Burnaby, British Columbia, and reduce our workforce by approximately 15%. As a result of the reduction in workforce and an evaluation of our future needs, we determined that we would not occupy and would sublease, to the extent possible, certain of our research facilities. The restructuring plan was designed to focus resources on our development pipeline and particularly the potential commercial opportunity of our lead product candidate, panitumumab.

In accordance with SFAS No. 146, we recorded in the second quarter of 2005 restructuring charges of $14.7 million in total, including $2.7 million of one-time termination benefits, $6.5 million of lease obligations and $5.6 million for impairment of leasehold improvements and other assets. Lease obligations of $6.5 million represented the fair value of future lease commitment costs, net of projected sublease rental income, for the research facilities that we decided not to occupy as a result of the restructuring. The estimated future cash flows used in the fair value calculation are based on certain estimates and assumptions by management, including the projected sublease rental income, the amount of time the space will be unoccupied prior to sublease and the length of any subleases.

It is possible that our estimates and assumptions may change in the future, resulting in adjustments to the estimated sublease income, and the effect of any adjustments could be significant. If the sublease rental rates would differ from our assumptions by approximately 10% in either direction, the liability related to lease obligations as of June 30, 2005 would be increased and decreased by

approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. If our estimated sublease timetable were delayed by six months, it would result in an additional liability of approximately $0.7 million, or more, if there were a further delay. We will review our estimates and assumptions on a quarterly basis, until the outcome is finalized, and modify these estimates as necessary to reflect any changes in circumstances.

Income Taxes

Significant management judgment is required in developing our provision for income taxes, including the calculation of tax liabilities, the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be required against the deferred tax assets. Results of operations in each jurisdiction involve intercompany agreements between us and our Canadian subsidiary. Such agreements could be unfavorably interpreted by the applicable taxing authorities, causing an increase in the income tax provision and a negative impact on our results of operations. The assessment of the income tax implications of this intercompany relationship requires significant management judgment.

Stock Option Valuation

The preparation of the notes to our consolidated financial statements requires us to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees. While fair value may be readily determinable for awards of stock, market quotes are not available for long-term, nontransferable stock options because these instruments are not traded. We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of employee stock options. However, the Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes to the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. We are currently evaluating our option valuation methodologies and assumptions in light of SFAS No. 123(R), which we are required to adopt on January 1, 2006.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

As of June 30, 2005, future minimum payments for certain contractual obligations for years subsequent to December 31, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):

	Total		Less than 1 year(1)		1 – 3 years		4 – 5 years		After 5 years(2)
Operating leases(3)	$	123,890	$	6,981	$	29,151	$	31,213	$	56,545
Convertible notes due 2007 & interest	121,713		1,991		119,722		—		—
Convertible notes due 2011 & interest	334,067		2,625		10,500		10,500		310,442
Convertible note due 2013	50,000		—		—		—		50,000
Redeemable convertible preferred stock	50,000		—		—		—		50,000
Amgen(4)	52,813		—		—		—		—
Purchase orders	1,452		1,452		—		—		—
Total	$	733,935	$	13,049	$	159,373	$	41,713	$	466,987

(1)	This represents the period of July 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005.

(2)	Amounts represent total minimum payments for the entire period.

(3)	Amounts include approximately $23.2 million of operating lease payments related to facilities in connection with the restructuring plan implemented in the second quarter of 2005. The discounted operating lease payments, net of estimated sublease rental income, related to these facilities were included as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005.

(4)	The $52.8 million long-term obligation to Amgen consists of $50.3 million in advances under the credit facility and $2.5 million of accrued interest. The timing of future minimum payments is uncertain as this obligation may be repaid out of profits resulting from future product sales.

We have a commitment to share equally all development and commercialization costs for panitumumab pursuant to our development and commercialization agreement with Amgen. As amended in October 2003, that agreement provides that Amgen will have decision-making authority for development and commercialization activities and will make available to us in 2004 and 2005 up to $60.0 million in advances that we may use to fund a portion of our share of development and commercialization costs for panitumumab after we contributed $20.0 million toward development costs in 2004. We began accessing this facility in 2004 and, as of June 30, 2005, we had a carrying balance of $52.8 million under this facility consisting of $50.3 million in advances and $2.5 million of interest accrued at the contract rate of 12% per annum. We have notified Amgen of the intent to draw a cash advance of an additional $2.7 million. The amount of any such advances, plus interest, may be repaid out of profits resulting from future product sales and we are generally not obligated to repay any portion of the loan if panitumumab does not reach commercialization.

Risk Factors That Might Affect Future Results

Risks Related to our Finances

We are an early stage company without commercial therapeutic products, and we cannot assure you that we will develop sufficient revenues in the future to sustain our business.

You must evaluate us in light of the uncertainties and complexities present in an early stage biopharmaceutical company. With the exception of panitumumab, all of our product candidates are in early stages of development. We will need to make significant additional investments in research and development, preclinical testing and clinical trials, and in regulatory and sales and marketing activities, to commercialize current and future product candidates. Our product candidates, if successfully developed and approved for marketing, may not generate sufficient or sustainable revenues to enable us to be profitable.

We have a history of losses and we expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

We have incurred net losses since we were organized as an independent company, including in the last five years net losses of $8.8 million in 2000, $60.9 million in 2001, $208.9 million in 2002, $196.4 million in 2003 and $187.5 million in 2004, and $126.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, our accumulated deficit was $879.0 million. Our losses to date have resulted principally from:

• research and development costs relating to the development of our XenoMouse and XenoMax technologies and antibody product candidates;

• manufacturing start-up costs related to our manufacturing facility including depreciation, costs of outside contractors and personnel for quality assurance and quality control activities;

• general and administrative costs relating to our operations;

• impairment charges related to our strategic investments in CuraGen, ImmunoGen, Inc., and MDS Proteomics Inc.; and

• impairment charges relating to acquired technologies, including our SLAM technology and technologies in the fields of intrabodies and catalytic antibodies.

We expect to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future as a result of our research and development costs and manufacturing start-up costs, including costs associated with conducting preclinical development and clinical trials, which will continue to be substantial, and charges related to purchases of technology or other assets. We intend to invest significantly in our products prior to entering into licensing agreements. This will increase our need for capital and will result in losses for at least the next several years. We expect that the amount of operating losses will fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter as a result of increases or decreases in our research and development efforts, the execution or termination of licensing, manufacturing and other contractual arrangements, the progress or lack of progress of product development candidates in our collaboration with AstraZeneca, the initiation, success or failure of clinical trials and whether any of our product candidates, including panitumumab, achieve commercial success.

We are currently unprofitable and may never be profitable, and our future revenues could fluctuate significantly.

Since our founding, we have funded our research and development activities primarily from private placements and public offerings of our securities and from revenues generated by our licensing and other contractual arrangements.

Prior to any marketing approval of panitumumab, we expect that substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future will result from payments under licensing and other contractual arrangements. To date, payments under licensing and other agreements have been in the form of license fees, milestone payments, reimbursement for research and development expenses, option fees, and payments for manufacturing services. Payments under our existing and any future customer agreements will be subject to significant fluctuation in both timing and amount. Our revenues may not be indicative of our future performance or of our ability to continue to achieve contractual milestones. Our revenues and results of operations for any period may also not be comparable to the revenues or results of operations for any other period. Our revenues for any period may not be sufficient to cover our operating costs, including the costs of operating our manufacturing plant. We may not be able to:

• enter into further co-development, licensing, manufacturing or other agreements;

• successfully complete preclinical development or clinical trials;

• obtain required regulatory approvals;

• successfully manufacture or market product candidates; or

• generate additional revenues or profitability.

Our failure to achieve any of the above goals would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may require additional financing, and an inability to raise the necessary capital or to do so on acceptable terms would threaten the continued success of our business.

We will continue to expend substantial resources to support research and development and operate our manufacturing facility, including costs associated with preclinical development and clinical trials. In the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we incurred expenses of $124.8 million, $98.2 million and $128.5 million, respectively, on research and development. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we spent $71.3 million on research and development. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, our manufacturing start-up costs were $6.8 million. Regulatory and business factors will require us

to expend substantial funds in the course of completing required additional development, preclinical testing and clinical trials of, and attaining regulatory approvals for, product candidates. The amounts of expenditures that will be necessary to execute our business plan are subject to numerous uncertainties that may adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

• the scope and results of preclinical development and clinical trials;

• the retention of existing and establishment of further co-development, licensing, manufacturing and other agreements, if any;

• the decisions of our collaborator, Amgen, under our co-development agreement for panitumumab, which provides Amgen decision-making authority for development and commercialization activities and obligates us to share 50% of the development and commercialization costs;

• continued scientific progress in our research and development programs;

• the size and complexity of these programs;

• the cost of operating our manufacturing facility, validating our processes and complying with good manufacturing practice regulations;

• the cost of conducting commercialization activities and arrangements;

• the time and expense involved in seeking regulatory approvals;

• competing technological and market developments;

• the time and expense of filing and prosecuting patent applications, and enforcing and defending against patent claims;

• our investment in, or acquisition of, other companies;

• the amount of product or technology in-licensing in which we engage;

• the extent and duration of market exclusivity we can command for our products, through patent and regulatory laws; and

• other factors not within our control.

We believe that our current cash balances, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and the cash generated from our licensing and other contractual arrangements, will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital requirements for at least one year. However, because of the uncertainties in our business, including the uncertainties listed above, we cannot assure you that this will be the case. In addition, we may choose to obtain additional financing from time to time. We may choose to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing, licensing and other agreements, a bank line of credit, sale-lease back financing, mortgage financing, asset sales or other arrangements. We cannot be sure that any additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Furthermore, any additional equity or equity-related financing may be dilutive to our stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may subject us to restrictive covenants and significant interest costs. We may also choose to obtain funding through licensing and other contractual arrangements. Such agreements may require us to relinquish our rights to certain of our technologies, products or marketing territories. Our failure to raise

capital when needed would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our indebtedness may harm our financial condition and results of operations.

At June 30, 2005, we had approximately $463.6 million of outstanding notes, including $113.7 million of convertible subordinated notes due March 15, 2007, $300.0 million of outstanding convertible senior notes due December 15, 2011 and a $50.0 million note held by AstraZeneca. In addition, at June 30, 2005, we had accrued approximately $52.8 million in long-term liabilities to Amgen pursuant to our co-development agreement. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future operations, including, without limitation:

• we will have additional cash requirements in order to support the payment of interest on our outstanding indebtedness;

• increases in our outstanding indebtedness and leverage will increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressure; and

• depending on the levels of our outstanding debt, our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate and other purposes may be limited.

Our ability to make payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt, we may be required, among other things:

• to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;

• to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the notes;

• to sell selected assets;

• to reduce or delay planned capital expenditures; or

• to reduce or delay planned operating expenditures, such as clinical trials.

Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.

Our strategic investments expose us to equity price risk and our investments in those companies may be deemed impaired, which would affect our results of operations.

We are exposed to equity price risk on our strategic investments in CuraGen and ImmunoGen and we may elect to make additional similar investments in the future. In 1999 and 2000, we purchased an aggregate amount of $80.0 million of the common stock of CuraGen and ImmunoGen as strategic investments. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities generally are excluded from earnings and reported as a component of stockholders’ equity. However, if a decline in the fair value of available-for-sale securities is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis and the amount of the write-down is included in earnings as an impairment charge. In 2002, declines in the fair value of the CuraGen and ImmunoGen common stock were deemed to be other-than-temporary and we recorded impairment charges totaling $67.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The public trading prices of the shares of both companies have fluctuated significantly since we purchased them and could continue to do so. If the public trading prices

of these shares trade below our adjusted cost basis in future periods, we may incur additional impairment charges relating to these investments, which could adversely affect our results of operations. The amount of these charges, if any, will equal our unrealized loss on these securities as of the end of the relevant periods. As of June 30, 2005, these investments were recorded at fair value in long-term investments on the balance sheet, and any net unrealized holding gains and losses are reported as a component of stockholders’ equity.

Risks Related to the Development and Commercialization of our Products

Our XenoMouse and XenoMax technologies may not produce safe, efficacious or commercially viable products, which will be critical to our ability to generate revenues from our products.

Our XenoMouse and XenoMax technologies are new approaches to developing antibodies as products for the treatment of diseases and medical disorders. To date, neither we nor our customers have commercialized any antibody therapeutic products based on our technologies. Moreover, we are not aware of any commercialized, fully human antibody therapeutic products that have been generated from any technologies similar to ours. Our antibody therapeutic product candidates are still in various stages of development and many are in an early development stage. We have initiated clinical trials with respect to four proprietary fully human antibody therapeutic product candidates, and our collaborators have initiated clinical trials with respect to nine other fully human antibody therapeutic product candidates generated by XenoMouse technology. We cannot be certain that our technologies will generate antibodies against every antigen to which they are exposed in an efficient and timely manner, if at all. Furthermore, our technologies may not result in any meaningful benefits to our current or potential customers or in product candidates that are safe and efficacious for patients. Our failure to generate antibody therapeutic product candidates that lead to the successful commercialization of products would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not successfully develop our products, or if they do not achieve commercial success, our business will be materially harmed.

Our development of current and future product candidates, either alone or in conjunction with collaborators, is subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of new pharmaceutical products and products based on new technologies. These risks include:

• delays in product development, clinical testing or manufacturing;

• unplanned expenditures in product development, clinical testing or manufacturing;

• failure in clinical trials or failure to receive regulatory approvals;

• emergence of superior or equivalent product development technologies or products;

• inability to manufacture on our own, or through others, product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale;

• inability to market products due to third-party proprietary rights;

• election by our customers not to pursue product development;

• failure by our customers to develop products successfully; and

• failure to achieve market acceptance.

In certain instances, we have terminated the clinical development of product candidates when the results of clinical trials did not warrant continued development. We hope to be able to make up for the loss of diversity in our product pipeline through the number and variety of potential new product candidates we have in preclinical development. However, to the extent that we are unable to maintain a broad and diverse range of product candidates, our success would depend more heavily on one or a few product candidates.

Because of these risks, our research and development efforts and those of our customers and collaborators may not result in any commercially viable products. Our failure to successfully complete a significant portion of these development efforts, to obtain required regulatory approvals or to achieve commercial success with any approved products would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Before we commercialize and sell any of our product candidates, we must conduct clinical trials, which are expensive and have uncertain outcomes.

Conducting clinical trials is a lengthy, time-consuming and expensive process. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any products, we must demonstrate through preclinical testing and clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective for use in humans. We have incurred and will continue to incur substantial expense for, and we have devoted and expect to continue to devote a significant amount of time to, preclinical testing and clinical trials.

Completion of clinical trials may take several years or more. The length of time generally varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of the product candidate.

Many factors may delay our commencement and rate of completion of clinical trials, including:

• the number of patients that ultimately participate in the trial, which may be affected by the availability of competing therapeutic alternatives;

• the length of time required to enroll suitable patient subjects;

• the duration of patient follow-up that seems appropriate in view of the results;

• the number of clinical sites included in the trials;

• changes in regulatory requirements for clinical trials or any governmental or regulatory delays or clinical holds requiring suspension or termination of the trials;

• delays, suspensions or termination of the clinical trials due to the institutional review board responsible for overseeing the study at a particular study site;

• unforeseen safety issues; and

• inability to manufacture on our own, or through others, adequate supplies of the product candidate being tested.

We have limited experience in conducting and managing clinical trials. We rely on third parties, including our collaborators, to assist us in managing and monitoring clinical trials. Our reliance on these third parties may result in delays in completing, or in failure to complete, these trials if the third parties fail to perform under our agreements with them.

In addition, we have ongoing research projects that may lead to product candidates, but we have not submitted INDs, nor begun clinical trials for these projects. Our ability to file additional INDs, and to build

diversity and scale in our product portfolio, depends to a significant extent on our ability to identify additional potential product candidates through our preclinical research and to conduct preclinical research efficiently. Our preclinical or clinical development efforts may not be successfully completed, we may not file further INDs and clinical trials may not commence as planned.

Two of our proprietary product candidates, panitumumab and ABX-10241, are in various stages of clinical trials. We have discontinued development of three proprietary product candidates, ABX-CBL, ABX-IL8 and ABX-MA1. To date, data obtained from these clinical trials have been insufficient to demonstrate safety and efficacy under applicable FDA guidelines. As a result, these data will not support an application for regulatory approval without further clinical trials or further results from ongoing trials. Clinical trials that we conduct or that third parties conduct on our behalf may not demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy to obtain the requisite regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates. We expect to commence new clinical trials from time to time in the course of our business as our product development work continues. However, regulatory authorities may not permit us to undertake any additional clinical trials for our product candidates. In addition, the FDA, other regulatory authorities, our partners, the institutional review boards for clinical trial sites or we may suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time.

Our product candidates may fail to demonstrate safety or efficacy in clinical trials. For example, in 2002 we completed analysis of a Phase 2b clinical trial of ABX-IL8 in psoriasis, concluded that the results did not warrant continued development in psoriasis and decided not to proceed with studies in other disease indications. Similarly, in February 2003, we completed a preliminary analysis of the results from the Phase 2/3 clinical trial of ABX-CBL and concluded that the study did not meet its primary endpoint. Therefore, we and our co-developer, SangStat (now a subsidiary of Genzyme Corporation) do not plan any further development of ABX-CBL. Failures of clinical trials of any product candidate could delay the development of other product candidates or hinder our ability to obtain additional financing. In addition, failures in our clinical trials can lead to additional research and development expenses. Any delays in, or termination of, our clinical trials could impede our ability to commercialize our product candidates and materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Success in early clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained in subsequent trials.

Results from our early stage clinical trials and those of our collaborators are based on a limited number of patients and may, upon review, be revised or negated by authorities or by later stage clinical trials. Historically, the results from preclinical testing and early clinical trials have often not been predictive of results obtained in later clinical trials. A number of new drugs and biologics have shown promising results in clinical trials, but subsequently failed to establish sufficient safety and efficacy data to obtain necessary regulatory approvals. Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are susceptible to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, we may encounter regulatory delays or rejections as a result of many factors, including: changes in regulatory policy during the period of product development; delays in obtaining regulatory approvals to commence a study; lack of efficacy during clinical trials; or unforeseen safety issues.

Our own ability to manufacture is uncertain, which may make it more difficult for us to develop and sell our products.

We have limited experience manufacturing antibody therapeutic product candidates in our manufacturing facility. We intend to use our manufacturing facility for the manufacture of product candidates for clinical trials and to support the potential early commercial launch of a limited number of products, in each case, in compliance with FDA and European good manufacturing practices. We have yet to manufacture a commercial product in our facility. In May 2000, we signed a long-term lease for the building that contains this manufacturing facility. Construction has been completed and the facility is operational, although portions of the facility are still to be validated. In October 2003, following an inspection by the California State Department of Health Services, we received a State Drug Manufacturing License. The license permits us to manufacture and ship clinical material from our manufacturing facility.

The total cost of the facility was approximately $150 million. The costs of completing validation of this facility and qualifying the facility for regulatory compliance may be higher than expected. We currently have excess production services capacity and this condition may persist for an extended period. However, if the commercial launch of one or more of our product candidates proves successful, we will likely experience capacity shortages and may need to use one or more third-party facilities to produce these products in sufficient quantities.

The process of manufacturing antibody therapeutic products is complex. While the managers of the facility have gained extensive manufacturing experience in prior positions with other companies, we have limited experience in the clinical or commercial scale manufacturing of our existing product candidates, or any other antibody therapeutic products, in our facility. We will need to hire, train and retain additional qualified manufacturing, quality control and quality assurance personnel. Also, we will need to manufacture such antibody therapeutic products in a facility and by an appropriately validated process that comply with FDA, European and other regulations. Our manufacturing operations will be subject to ongoing, periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA, European and other foreign regulatory agencies and state regulatory agencies to ensure compliance with good manufacturing practices and applicable health and safety regulations. If we are unable to manufacture product or product candidates in accordance with FDA and European good manufacturing practices we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for our products . Any significant manufacturing changes for the production of our product candidates could result in delays in development or regulatory approval or in the reduction or interruption of commercial sales of our product candidates. Our inability to manufacture clinical or commercial supplies or to maintain our manufacturing operations in compliance with applicable regulations within our planned time and cost parameters could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also may encounter problems with the following:

• production yields;

• quality control and assurance;

• availability of qualified personnel;

• availability of raw materials;

• adequate training of new and existing personnel;

• on-going compliance with our standard operating procedures;

• on-going compliance with FDA and other health authority regulations;

• production costs; and

• development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls.

In addition, the FDA and other regulatory authorities will require us to register any manufacturing facilities in which our antibody therapeutic products are manufactured. These facilities will be subject to periodic and unannounced inspections to confirm compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices or other equivalent regulations. The FDA or foreign regulatory bodies will not grant pre-market approval of our product candidates, including panitumumab, if our facilities cannot pass a pre-license inspection. Therefore, both the filing and approval of a Biologic License Application, or BLA, for panitumumab could be delayed if we are unable to meet the relevant pre-license requirements and or if our facilities and operating systems do not pass a pre-license inspection. In complying with FDA regulations and foreign regulatory requirements, we will be obligated to expend time, money and effort in production, record keeping and quality control in an effort to ensure that our product candidates meet applicable specifications

and other requirements. Our failure to maintain regulatory compliance would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may rely on third-party manufacturers, and we may have difficulty conducting clinical trials or commercializing product candidates if a manufacturer does not perform in accordance with our expectations.

Previously, we relied on contract manufacturers to produce candidates under good manufacturing practice regulations for use in our clinical trials. While we have established our own manufacturing facility, we cannot assure you that we will be able to qualify this facility for compliance with FDA and European good manufacturing practices or manufacture sufficient quantities of our product candidates for clinical trials or a potential early commercial launch. We continually evaluate our options for commercial production of our product candidates, including third-party manufacturers.

Third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in scaling up production, including problems involving production yields, quality control and assurance, shortage of qualified personnel, shortage of capacity, compliance with FDA and other applicable regulations, production costs, and development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. They may not perform as agreed or may not remain in the contract manufacturing business for the time required by us to successfully produce and market our product candidates. Also, third-party manufacturers may have difficulty maintaining compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices or equivalent regulations, or having their facilities pass a pre-license or routine inspection. Any failure of third-party manufacturers to deliver the required quantities of our product candidates for clinical use on a timely basis and at commercially reasonable prices, and our failure to find replacement manufacturers or successfully implement our own manufacturing capabilities, would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The successful growth of revenues from our manufacturing services depends to a large extent on our ability to find third parties who agree to use our services and our ability to provide those services successfully.

We intend to enhance our contract revenues by entering into agreements to provide antibody production services to third parties. Potential third parties include our existing collaborators, as well as other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, technology companies, academic institutions and other entities. We must enter into these agreements to successfully develop this aspect of our business. To date, we have entered into only a few production services agreements and we cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into additional agreements.

We may not be able to secure manufacturing agreements on favorable terms. If we do obtain such agreements, we may encounter difficulties in performing as agreed. We may encounter difficulties in scaling up production, including problems involving production yields, quality control and assurance, shortage of qualified personnel, training of personnel, compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices and other applicable regulations, production costs, and development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. The failure to deliver required quantities of product on a timely basis and at commercially reasonable prices could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The successful growth of our business depends to a large extent on our ability to find third-party collaborators to develop and commercialize many of our product candidates.

Our strategy for the development and commercialization of antibody therapeutic products depends, in large part, upon the formation of collaboration agreements with third parties. Potential third parties include pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, technology companies, academic institutions and other entities. We must enter into these agreements to successfully develop and commercialize product candidates. These agreements are necessary in order for us to:

• access proprietary antigens for which we can generate fully human antibody products;

• fund research, preclinical development, clinical trials and manufacturing;

• seek and obtain regulatory approvals; and

• successfully commercialize existing and future product candidates.

Our ability to continue our current collaborations and to enter into additional third party collaborations is dependent in large part on our ability to successfully demonstrate that our XenoMouse technology is an attractive method of developing antibody therapeutic products. We have generated only a limited number of fully human antibody therapeutic product candidates pursuant to our collaboration agreements that have advanced to the clinical stage. Our failure to maintain our existing collaboration agreements or to enter into additional agreements could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our dependence on licensing, collaboration, manufacturing and other agreements with third parties subjects us to a number of risks. These agreements may not be on terms that prove favorable to us, and we typically afford our collaborators significant discretion in electing whether to pursue any of the planned activities. Licensing and other contractual arrangements may require us to relinquish our rights to certain of our technologies, products or marketing territories. To the extent we agree to work exclusively with one collaborator in a given therapeutic area, our opportunities to collaborate with other entities could be curtailed. For example, our collaboration with AstraZeneca for the identification and development of therapeutic antibodies in oncology contains exclusivity provisions that significantly restrict our ability, during a three-year target selection period, to enter into arrangements with third parties in the field of oncology as well as our ability to conduct research and development activities in that field. To the extent that our collaboration with AstraZeneca is not successful, our ability to develop antibodies for use in oncology applications through other collaborations will be severely curtailed. Our collaboration with AstraZeneca also limits our ability to develop such antibodies through our own independent development.

We cannot control the amount or timing of resources our collaborators may devote to a collaboration, and collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected. Additionally, business combinations or significant changes in a collaborator’s business strategy may adversely affect a collaborator’s willingness or ability to complete its obligations under the arrangement. Even if we fulfill our obligations under an agreement, typically our collaborators can terminate the agreement at any time following proper written notice. The termination or breach of agreements by our collaborators, or the failure of our collaborators to complete their obligations in a timely manner, could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are not able to establish further collaboration agreements or any or all of our existing agreements are terminated, we may be required to seek new collaborators or to undertake product development and commercialization at our own expense. Such an undertaking may:

• limit the number of product candidates that we will be able to develop and reduce the likelihood of successful product introduction;

• significantly increase our capital requirements; and

• place additional strain on our management’s time.

Existing or potential collaborators may pursue alternative technologies, including those of our competitors, or enter into other transactions that could make a collaboration with us less attractive to them. For example, if an existing collaborator purchases a company that is one of our competitors, that company could be less willing to continue its collaboration with us. Moreover, disputes may arise with respect to the ownership of rights to any technology or products developed with any current or future collaborator. Lengthy negotiations with potential new collaborators or disagreements between us and our collaborators may lead to delays in or termination of the research, development or commercialization of product

candidates or result in time-consuming and expensive litigation or arbitration. The decision by our collaborators to pursue alternative technologies or the failure of our collaborators to develop or commercialize successfully any product candidate to which they have obtained rights from us could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to extensive government regulation, which will require us to spend significant amounts of money, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approvals, which are required for us to conduct clinical testing and commercialize our products.

Our product candidates under development are subject to extensive and rigorous domestic government regulation. The FDA regulates, among other things, the development, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, record-keeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution of biopharmaceutical products. If we market our products abroad, they will also be subject to extensive regulation by foreign governments. Neither the FDA nor any other regulatory agency has approved any of our product candidates for sale in the United States or any foreign market. The regulatory review and approval process, which includes preclinical studies and clinical trials of each product candidate, is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. The recent withdrawal of certain approved products from the market may lead to longer review periods by the FDA, particularly for product candidates being reviewed under an accelerated approval process, or may result in requests for more extensive trials or data.

Securing FDA approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data, manufacturing data and supporting information to the FDA for each indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy. The generation of data supporting the approval process takes many years, requires the expenditure of substantial resources, and may involve post-marketing surveillance and requirements for post-marketing studies. As we conduct clinical trials for a given product candidate, we may decide or the FDA may require us to make changes in our plans and protocols. Such changes may relate to, for example, changes in the standard of care for a particular disease indication, comparability of efficacy and toxicity of materials where a change in materials is proposed, or competitive developments foreclosing the availability of expedited approval procedures. We may be required to support proposed changes with additional preclinical or clinical testing, which could delay the expected time line for concluding clinical trials. The approval of a product candidate may depend on the acceptability to the FDA of data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States. Regulatory requirements are subject to frequent change. Delays in obtaining regulatory approvals may:

• adversely affect the successful commercialization of any drugs that we or our customers develop;

• impose costly procedures on us or our customers;

• diminish any competitive advantages that we or our customers may attain; and

• adversely affect our receipt of revenues or royalties.

Our product candidates may not be approved or may be approved with limitations or for indications that differ from those we initially target. Even if marketing approval from the FDA is received, the FDA may impose post-marketing requirements, such as:

• labeling and advertising requirements, restrictions or limitations, such as the inclusion of warnings, precautions, contra-indications or use limitations that could have a material impact on the future profitability of our product candidates;

• testing and surveillance to monitor our future products and their continued compliance with regulatory requirements; and

• inspection of products and manufacturing operations and, if any inspection reveals that the product or operation is not in compliance, prohibiting the sale of all products, suspending manufacturing or withdrawing market clearance.

The discovery of previously unknown problems with our future products may result in restrictions of the products, including withdrawal from manufacture. Additionally, certain material changes affecting an approved product such as manufacturing changes or additional labeling claims are subject to further FDA review and approval. The FDA may revisit and change its prior determination with regard to the safety or efficacy of our products and withdraw any required approvals after we obtain them. Even prior to any formal regulatory action requiring labeling changes or affecting manufacturing, we could voluntarily decide to cease the distribution and sale or recall any of our future products if concerns about their safety and efficacy develop.

In their regulation of advertising, the FDA and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) may issue correspondence alleging that particular advertising or promotional practices are false, misleading or deceptive. The FDA or FTC may impose a wide array of sanctions on companies for such advertising practices. Additionally, physicians may prescribe pharmaceutical or biologic products for uses that are not described in a product’s labeling or differ from those tested by us and approved by the FDA. While such “off-label” uses are common and the FDA does not regulate physicians’ choice of treatments, the FDA does restrict a manufacturer’s communications on the subject of “off-label” use. Companies cannot promote FDA-approved pharmaceutical or biologic products for off-label uses. If our advertising or promotional activities fail to comply with the FDA’s or FTC’s regulations or guidelines, we may be subject to warnings from, or enforcement action by, the FDA or FTC.

If we fail to comply with applicable FDA and other regulatory requirements at any stage during the regulatory process, we or our third-party manufacturers may be subject to sanctions, including:

• delays;

• warning letters;

• fines;

• clinical holds;

• consent decrees;

• product recalls or seizures;

• changes to advertising;

• injunctions;

• refusal of the FDA to review pending market approval applications or supplements to approval applications;

• total or partial suspension of product manufacturing, distribution, marketing and sales;

• civil penalties;

• withdrawals of previously approved marketing applications; and

• criminal prosecutions.

In many instances we expect to rely on our customers and co-developers to file INDs and generally direct the regulatory approval process for products derived from our technologies. These customers and co-developers may not be able to or may choose not to conduct clinical testing or obtain necessary approvals from the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any product candidates. If they fail to obtain required governmental approvals, we will experience delays in or be precluded from marketing or realizing the commercial benefits from the marketing of products derived from our technologies. In addition, our failure to obtain the required approvals would preclude the commercial use of our products. Any such delays and limitations may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to manufacture our product candidates in compliance with current good manufacturing practices requirements, we will not be able to commercialize our product candidates.

We are required to comply with the applicable FDA current good manufacturing practice, or “cGMP” regulations and the requirements of other regulatory authorities. Good manufacturing practice regulations include requirements relating to quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturing facilities, including our facility, must pass a pre-license inspection by the FDA before initiating commercial manufacturing of any product. The FDA enforces post-marketing regulatory requirements such as cGMP requirements, through periodic unannounced inspections. We do not know whether we will pass any future FDA inspections. Failure to pass an inspection could disrupt, delay or shut down our manufacturing operations. In addition, cGMP requirements are constantly evolving and new or different requirements may apply in the future. Manufacturing facilities in California, including our facility, are also subject to the licensing requirements of and inspection by the State of California Department of Health Services. In October 2003, following an inspection, we received a Drug Manufacturing License from the State of California. The license, which must be renewed annually, permits us to manufacture and ship clinical material. We are responsible for manufacturing clinical and, for the first five years after launch, commercial supplies for panitumumab with Amgen’s support and assistance. We may not be able to comply with applicable cGMP requirements and other regulatory requirements. Our failure to comply with these requirements could delay or prevent the approval of our product candidates and would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our products do not gain market acceptance among the medical community, our revenues would greatly decline and might not be sufficient to support our operations.

Our product candidates may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, third-party payors and the medical community. We may not achieve market acceptance even if clinical trials demonstrate safety and efficacy, and the necessary regulatory and reimbursement approvals are obtained. The degree of market acceptance of any product candidates that we develop will depend on a number of factors, including:

• establishment and demonstration of clinical efficacy and safety;

• cost-effectiveness of our product candidates;

• their potential advantage over alternative treatment methods;

• reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors; and

• marketing and distribution support for our product candidates, including the efforts of our collaborators where they have marketing and distribution responsibilities.

Physicians will not recommend therapies using our products until such time as clinical data or other factors demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such procedures as compared to conventional drug and other treatments. Even if we establish the clinical safety and efficacy of therapies using our antibody product

candidates, physicians may elect not to recommend the therapies for any number of other reasons, including whether the mode of administration of our antibody products is effective for certain indications. Antibody products, including our product candidates as they would be used for certain disease indications, are typically administered by infusion or injection, which requires substantial cost and inconvenience to patients. Our product candidates, if successfully developed, will compete with a number of drugs and therapies manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical and other biotechnology companies. Our products may also compete with new products currently under development by others. Physicians, patients, third-party payers and the medical community may not accept or utilize any product candidates that we or our customers develop. The failure of our products to achieve significant market acceptance would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not have marketing and sales experience, which may require us to rely on others to market and sell our products and may make it more challenging for us to commercialize our product candidates.

Although we have been marketing our XenoMouse technology to potential customers and collaborators for several years, we do not have marketing, sales or distribution experience or capability with respect to our therapeutic product candidates. We intend to enter into arrangements with third parties to market and sell most of our therapeutic product candidates when we commercialize them. For example, pursuant to our amended joint development agreement for panitumumab, Amgen has decision-making authority for development and commercialization activities relating to any products developed under the collaboration, and we have the right to co-promote any products. Should this product candidate proceed to commercialization, it will take significant resources to develop the appropriate sales capabilities and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do this successfully. We may not be able to enter into additional marketing and sales arrangements with others on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that we enter into marketing and sales arrangements with other companies, our revenues, if any, will depend on the efforts of others. These efforts may not be successful. If we are unable to enter into third-party arrangements, we will need to develop a marketing and sales force, which may need to be substantial in size, in order to achieve commercial success for any product candidate approved by the FDA. We may not successfully develop marketing and sales capabilities or have sufficient resources to do so. If we do develop such capabilities, we will compete with other companies that have experienced and well-funded marketing and sales operations. Our failure to enter into successful marketing arrangements with third parties and our inability to conduct such activities ourselves would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Our ability to protect our intellectual property rights will be critically important to the success of our business, and we may not be able to protect these rights in the United States or abroad.

Our success depends in part on our ability to:

• obtain patents;

• protect trade secrets;

• operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others and defend ourselves from any allegation that we have done so; and

• prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights.

We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We attempt to protect our proprietary position by filing U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business. However, the patent position of biopharmaceutical companies involves complex legal and

factual questions, and, therefore, we cannot predict with certainty whether our patent applications will be approved or any resulting patents will be enforced. In addition, third parties may challenge, seek to invalidate or circumvent any of our patents, once they are issued. Thus, any patents that we own or license from third parties may not provide any protection against competitors. Our pending patent applications, those we may file in the future, or those we may license from third parties, may not result in patents being issued. Also, patent rights may not provide us with adequate proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technologies. The laws of certain foreign countries do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

In addition to patents, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how. We seek protection, in part, through confidentiality and proprietary information agreements. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our technology or adequate remedies in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential and proprietary information, and, in addition, the parties may breach such agreements. Also, our trade secrets may otherwise become known to, or be independently developed by, our competitors. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology that we have developed.

We may face challenges from third parties regarding the validity of our patents and proprietary rights, or from third parties asserting that we are infringing their patents or proprietary rights, which could result in litigation that would be costly to defend and could deprive us of valuable rights.

Parties have conducted research for many years in the antibody and transgenic animal fields. The term “transgenic”, when applied to an animal, such as a mouse, refers to an animal that has chromosomes into which human genes have been incorporated. This research has resulted in a substantial number of issued patents and an even larger number of pending patent applications. The publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature frequently occurs substantially later than the date on which the underlying discoveries were made. Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the patents and other proprietary rights of third parties. Our technologies may unintentionally infringe the patents or violate other proprietary rights of third parties. Such infringement or violation may prevent us and our customers from pursuing product development or commercialization. Such a result could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights has been common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits, United States Patent and Trademark Office interference proceedings, and related legal and administrative proceedings in the United States and internationally involve complex legal and factual questions. As a result, such proceedings are costly and time-consuming to pursue and their outcome is uncertain. Litigation may be necessary to:

• enforce patents that we own or license;

• protect trade secrets or know-how that we own or license; or

• determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others.

Our involvement in any litigation, interference or other administrative proceedings could cause us to incur substantial expense and could significantly divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel. An adverse determination may subject us to loss of our proprietary position or to significant liabilities, or require us to seek licenses that may not be available from third parties. An adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding, or a failure to obtain necessary licenses, may restrict or prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products, if any. Costs associated with these arrangements may be substantial and may include ongoing royalties. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all. These outcomes could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face intense competition and rapid technological change, and if we fail to develop products that keep pace with new technologies and that gain market acceptance, our product candidates or technologies could become obsolete.

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change. We face competition in several different forms. Our antibody generation activities currently face competition from several companies and technologies. In addition, the product candidates that we or our customers are developing also face competition. Finally, we compete with companies that currently offer antibody production services, and may compete with companies that currently only manufacture their own antibodies but could offer antibody production services to third parties.

We are aware of several pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are actively engaged in research and development in areas related to antibody therapy. Many of these companies have commenced clinical trials of antibody therapeutic product candidates or have successfully commercialized antibody therapeutic products for use on their own or in combination therapies. Many of these companies are addressing the same diseases and disease indications as we or our customers are.

We compete with companies that offer the services of generating monoclonal antibodies for antibody-based therapeutics. These competitors have specific expertise or technology related to antibody development and introduce new or modified technologies from time to time.

Many of these companies and institutions, either alone or together with their customers or collaborators, have substantially greater financial resources and larger research and development staffs than we do. In addition, many of these competitors, either alone or together with their customers or collaborators, have significantly greater experience than we do in:

• developing products;

• undertaking preclinical testing and human clinical trials;

• obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of products; and

• manufacturing and marketing products.

Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection, receiving FDA approval or commercializing products before we do. If we commence commercial product sales, we will be competing against companies with greater marketing and manufacturing capabilities, areas in which we have limited or no experience.

We also face, and will continue to face, competition from academic institutions, government agencies and research institutions. There are numerous competitors working on products to treat each of the diseases for which we are seeking to develop therapeutic products. In addition, any product candidate that we successfully develop may compete with existing therapies that have long histories of safe and effective use. Competition may also arise from:

• other drug development technologies and methods of preventing or reducing the incidence of disease;

• new small molecules; or

• other classes of therapeutic agents.

Developments by competitors may render our product candidates or technologies obsolete or non-competitive. We face and will continue to face intense competition from other companies for agreements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, for establishing relationships with academic and research institutions, and for licenses to proprietary technology. These competitors, either alone or with their customers, may succeed in developing technologies or products that are more effective than ours.

We also face competition from companies that provide production services. These include contract manufacturers, such as Lonza, Avid Bioservices, Inc., Diosynth Biotechnology, DSM N.V., Cangene Corporation and Goodwin Biotechnology Inc., and other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that manufacture their own product candidates but can make extra capacity available to collaborators and customers, such as Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Biogen Idec Inc., ICOS Corporation, Abbott and Novartis AG.

We face uncertainty over reimbursement and healthcare reform, which, if determined adversely to us, could seriously hinder the market acceptance of our products.

In both domestic and foreign markets, sales of our product candidates will depend in part upon the availability of reimbursement from third-party payors, such as government health administration authorities, managed care providers and private health insurers. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price and examining the cost effectiveness of medical products and services. In addition, significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved healthcare products. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. In addition, domestic and foreign governments continue to propose and pass legislation designed to reduce the cost of healthcare, which could further limit reimbursement for pharmaceuticals. The failure of government and third-party payors to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement rates for our product candidates could adversely affect the market acceptance of our products. The failure of our products to receive market acceptance would materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience pressure to lower the prices of any prescription pharmaceutical products we are able to obtain approval for because of new and/or proposed federal legislation.

New federal legislation, enacted in December 2003, has added an outpatient prescription drug benefit to Medicare, effective January 2006. In the interim, Congress has established a discount drug card program for Medicare beneficiaries. Both benefits will be provided primarily through private entities, which will attempt to negotiate price concessions from pharmaceutical manufacturers. These negotiations may increase pressures to lower prices. While the new law specifically prohibits the United States government from interfering in price negotiations between manufacturers and Medicare drug plan sponsors, some members of Congress are pursuing legislation that would permit the United States government to use its enormous purchasing power to demand discounts from pharmaceutical companies, thereby creating de facto price controls on prescription drugs. In addition, the new law contains triggers for Congressional consideration of cost containment measures for Medicare in the event Medicare cost increases exceed a certain level. These cost containment measures could include some sorts of limitations on prescription drug prices. The new legislation also modified the methodology used for reimbursement of physician administered and certain other drugs already covered under Medicare Part B. This new methodology would likely apply to certain of our products if and when commercialized. Experience with new reimbursement methodology is limited, and could be subject to change in the future. Our results of operations could be materially harmed by the different features of the Medicare prescription drug coverage legislation, by the potential effect of such legislation on amounts that private insurers will pay for our products and by other healthcare reforms that may be enacted or adopted in the future.

Other Risks Related to Our Company

Our restructuring plan may not achieve the results we intend and may harm our business.

In June 2005, we announced a restructuring plan, which includes a reduction in headcount. The planning and implementation of our restructuring has placed, and may continue to place a strain on our managerial, operational and other resources. The restructuring may negatively affect our employee turnover, recruiting and retention, and may not enable us to reduce our costs to the extent expected.

The future growth and success of our business will depend on our ability to continue to attract and retain our employees and consultants.

For us to pursue our product development, manufacturing, marketing and commercialization plans, we will need to hire additional qualified scientific, manufacturing, quality control, quality assurance, sales, marketing and key management personnel. We may also need to hire personnel with expertise in clinical testing, government regulation, law and finance. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel will be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, universities and non-profit research institutions. The inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We grant stock options as a method of attracting and retaining employees, to motivate performance and to align the interests of management with those of our stockholders. Due to fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock in recent years, a substantial portion of the stock options held by our employees have an exercise price that is higher than the current trading price of our common stock. We may elect to grant additional stock options at the current lower market price, pay higher cash compensation, or provide some combination of these alternatives to retain and attract qualified employees, but we cannot be sure that any of these actions would be successful. In addition, the issuance of additional stock options may be dilutive to existing stockholders. While we will continue to utilize our existing equity compensation plans to compensate employees, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified personnel if we are unable to obtain stockholder approval for any new plan as may be required to keep equity compensation available. In addition, the expensing of stock options and other stock-based awards, which will be required commencing on January 1, 2006, will increase any net losses or decrease any net income recorded in any given period and could affect the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

As a result of these factors, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified personnel, which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience difficulty in the integration of any future acquisition with the operations of our business.

We may from time to time seek to expand our business through corporate acquisitions. Our acquisition of companies and businesses and expansion of operations, involve risks such as the following:

• the potential inability to identify target companies best suited to our business plan;

• the potential inability to successfully integrate acquired operations and businesses and to realize anticipated synergies, economies of scale or other expected value;

• incurrence of expenses attendant to transactions that may or may not be consummated; and

• difficulties in managing and coordinating operations at multiple venues, which, among other things, could divert our management’s attention from other important business matters.

In addition, our past and future acquisitions of companies and businesses and expansion of operations may result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, U.S. or foreign tax liabilities, large one-time write-offs and the creation of goodwill or other intangible assets that could result in amortization expense or other charges to expense. For example, we have recorded impairment charges of $23.1 million and $1.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and $17.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2004, related to technologies acquired through our acquisitions, respectively, of Abgenix Biopharma and IntraImmune in 2000 and Hesed Biomed in 2001.

We have implemented a stockholder rights plan and are subject to other anti-takeover provisions, which could deter a party from effecting a takeover of us at a premium to our then-current stock price.

In June 1999, our board of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan, which we amended and restated in November 1999 and May 2002, and amended in October 2003. The stockholder rights plan and certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of us. This could affect the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock. Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws allow us to:

• issue preferred stock without any vote or further action by the stockholders;

• eliminate the right of stockholders to act by written consent without a meeting;

• specify procedures for director nominations by stockholders and submission of other proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings; and

• eliminate cumulative voting in the election of directors.

In October 2003, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with AstraZeneca for the purpose of identifying and developing antibody products for use in oncology therapeutics. The collaboration agreement includes provisions that would allow AstraZeneca to accelerate its selection of target antigens and, in certain situations, terminate the collaboration agreement, or specific programs or activities conducted under it, in the event of a change in control in us, particularly if we were acquired by a competitor of AstraZeneca. In the event of a change in control of us, AstraZeneca could also acquire control over the development programs and various intellectual property rights in respect of antigens that are the subject of the collaboration agreement. This would result in a reduction in the royalties and milestones to be paid by AstraZeneca to us under the collaboration agreement and the release of AstraZeneca from certain exclusivity provisions. In addition, certain exclusivity provisions contained in the collaboration agreement would apply to an acquirer of our company and would restrict the acquirer’s ability to operate its business in the oncology field after the acquisition, except with respect to pre-existing development programs. These and other provisions of the collaboration agreement could make our company less attractive to a potential acquirer, particularly an acquirer that conducts or expects to conduct significant operations in the field of oncology therapeutics.

We are also subject to certain provisions of Delaware law which could also delay or make more difficult a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us. In particular, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years unless the transaction meets certain conditions. The stockholder rights plan, the possible issuance of preferred stock, the procedures required for director nominations and stockholder proposals, our collaboration agreement with AstraZeneca and Delaware law could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including, without limitation, discouraging a proxy contest or making more difficult the acquisition of a substantial block of our common stock. The provisions also could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

We face product liability risks and may not be able to obtain adequate insurance, and if we are held liable for an uninsured claim or a claim in excess of our insurance limits, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed.

The use of any of our product candidates, or of any products manufactured in our facility, in clinical trials, and the sale of any approved products, may expose us to liability claims resulting from such use or sale. Consumers, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling such products might make claims of this kind. We may experience financial losses in the future due to product liability claims. We have obtained limited product liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials and production services activities, under which the coverage limits are $15.0 million per occurrence and $15.0 million in the aggregate. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses. If third parties bring a successful product liability claim or series of claims against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially harmed.

Our operations involve hazardous materials, and we could be held responsible for any damages caused by such materials.

Our research and manufacturing activities involve the controlled use of hazardous materials. In addition, although we maintain insurance for harm to employees and to our facilities caused by hazardous materials, we do not insure against any other harm (including harm to the environment) caused by the use of hazardous materials on our premises. We cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of an accident or environmental discharge, we may be held liable for any resulting damages, which may exceed our financial resources and may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and we do not plan to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Our stock price is highly volatile, and you may not be able to sell your shares of our common stock at a price greater than or equal to the price you paid for them.

The market price and trading volume of our common stock are volatile, and we expect such volatility to continue for the foreseeable future. For example, during the period between June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2005, our common stock closed as high as $11.36 per share and as low as $6.54 per share. This may impact your decision to buy or sell our common stock. Factors affecting our stock price include:

• our financial results;

• fluctuations in our operating results;

• announcements of technological innovations or new commercial therapeutic products by us or our competitors;

• published reports by securities analysts;

• developments in our clinical trials and in clinical trials for potentially competitive product candidates;

• government regulation;

• changes in reimbursement policies;

• developments in patent or other proprietary rights;

• announcements that we have entered into new collaboration, licensing or similar arrangements with new collaborators, or amendments of the terms of our existing collaborations;

• developments in our relationship with customers;

• public concern as to the safety and efficacy of our products; and

• general market conditions.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk. We are exposed to interest rate sensitivity on our investments in debt securities and our outstanding fixed rate debt. The objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal, while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we invest in highly liquid, investment grade and government debt securities. Our investments in debt securities are subject to interest rate risk. To minimize the exposure due to an adverse shift in interest rates, we invest in short-term securities and our goal is to maintain an average maturity of approximately one year. In addition, as of June 30, 2005, we had $113.7 million of outstanding 3.5% convertible subordinated notes due in 2007, and $300.0 million of outstanding 1.75% convertible senior notes due in 2011. The fair value of these convertible notes may fluctuate with changes in market interest rates, as well as changes in the market price of our common stock. A hypothetical 1.0% per annum decrease in interest rates would result in an adverse net change in the fair value of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities of approximately $18.2 million and $16.6 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

Equity Price Risk. We are exposed to equity price risk on strategic investments, such as those we have made in CuraGen and ImmunoGen. We typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on these securities. With respect to CuraGen and ImmunoGen, each of whose common stock is publicly traded, the aggregate market value of our investments in these securities was approximately $16.3 million and $23.3 million as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Due to decreases in the market prices of the shares of CuraGen and ImmunoGen, we recorded impairment charges of $67.3 million in 2002 related to these investments. The trading prices of shares of CuraGen and ImmunoGen have fluctuated significantly since we purchased these securities. Each additional 10% decrease in market value of these securities would result in a decrease in value of approximately $1.6 million and $2.3 million from the fair value of those investments at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Additional price declines could cause us to record additional impairment charges in future periods.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined by Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been made known to them in a timely fashion.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 13, 2005 at our principal executive offices at 6701 Kaiser Drive, Fremont, California 94555. A total of 65,508,818 shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, representing 72% of the voting power of the Company, was present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Matters submitted to stockholders at the Annual Meeting and the voting results thereof were as follows.

Election of Directors

Each of R. Scott Greer, M. Kathleen Behrens, Ph.D., Raju S. Kucherlapati, Ph.D., Kenneth B. Lee, Jr., Mark B. Logan, William R. Ringo and Thomas G. Wiggans, was re-elected to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors, having each received not less than 90% of the votes cast. The following is a breakdown of the voting results:

Director	Votes For	Votes Withheld
R. Scott Greer	64,024,220	1,484,598
M. Kathleen Behrens, Ph.D.	64,341,732	1,167,086
Raju S. Kucherlapati, Ph.D.	59,246,623	6,262,195
Kenneth B. Lee, Jr.	64,289,816	1,219,002
Mark B. Logan	59,391,891	6,116,927
William R. Ringo	64,340,607	1,168,211
Thomas G. Wiggans	59,364,503	6,144,315

Ratification of the Selection the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the 2005 Fiscal Year

Our stockholders ratified the selection of Ernst & Young, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2005. The following is a breakdown of the voting results:

Votes For		Votes Against		Abstentions		Broker Non-Votes
64,636,489		846,836		25,493		0

Approval of the 2005 Incentive Stock Plan

Because less than a majority of the voting power present at the meeting voted in favor of the proposal, our stockholders did not approve the adoption of the Abgenix, Inc. 2005 Incentive Stock Plan. The number of votes required to adopt this plan was 32,754,410. The following is a breakdown of the voting results:

Votes For		Votes Against		Abstentions		Broker Non-Votes
31,338,491		9,985,211		890,872		23,294,244

ITEM 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

Number		Description

3.1(1)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Abgenix, as currently in effect.
3.2(2)		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Abgenix, as currently in effect.
10.70(3)		Letter Agreement dated May 9, 2005, between Abgenix, Inc. and C. Geoffrey Davis.
31.1		Certification of William R. Ringo Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of H. Ward Wolff Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of William R. Ringo Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of H. Ward Wolff Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with Abgenix’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(2) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with Abgenix’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

(3) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with Abgenix’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 9, 2005

	ABGENIX, INC.
	(Registrant)


	/s/ WILLIAM R. RINGO
	William R. Ringo
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


	/s/ H. WARD WOLFF
	H. Ward Wolff
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number		Description

3.1(1)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Abgenix, as currently in effect.
3.2(2)		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Abgenix, as currently in effect.
10.70(3)		Letter Agreement dated May 9, 2005, between Abgenix, Inc. and C. Geoffrey Davis.
31.1		Certification of William R. Ringo Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of H. Ward Wolff Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of William R. Ringo Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of H. Ward Wolff Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with Abgenix’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(2) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with Abgenix’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

(3) Incorporated by reference to the same exhibit filed with Abgenix’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

Overview

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Risks Related to Our Industry

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

ITEM 5. Other Information

ITEM 6. Exhibits

ABGENIX INC 10-Q