UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(Mark One)
ý		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005

-OR-

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

-OR-

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 0333-~~26988~~69172

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		04-3565746
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
790 Turnpike Street North Andover, Massachusetts		01845
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)
790 Turnpike Street
North Andover, Massachusetts		01845
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 688-8833

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 688-8833

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)

Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes o No ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

At ~~August~~November 81, 2005 there were 5,813,856 shares of common stock (net of 1,335,722 shares of treasury stock), par value $.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding.

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.		FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.		Financial Statements	~~Financial Statements~~
				Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2005 and the Nexus Media (Predecessor) Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004
			Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2005 and the Nexus Media (Predecessor) Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004
				Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and the Nexus Media (Predecessor) Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2004
			Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2005 and the Nexus Media (Predecessor) Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004
				Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and the Nexus Media (Predecessor) Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the six months ended June 30, 2004
			Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September 30, 2005 and the Nexus Media (Predecessor) Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the nine months ended September 30, 2004
			Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	~~Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~
	ITEM 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~
	ITEM 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~
	ITEM 4.		Controls and Procedures	~~Controls and Procedures~~
PART II.		OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.		Legal Proceedings
	ITEM 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	ITEM 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities
	ITEM 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	ITEM 5.		Other Information
	ITEM 6.		Exhibits
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED ~~CONSOLIDATED~~ CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

				Predecessor
	Ergo			Nexus Media
	September 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,827,811		$	1,710,235
Trade receivables (net of allowance of doubtful accounts at September 30, 2005: $420,000 and December 31, 2004: $276,000)	4,059,631			6,851,599
Inventory	448,675			554,818
Deferred taxes	—			422,836
Prepaid and other current assets	2,629,796			1,766,037
Total current assets	14,965,913			11,305,525
Property & equipment, net	3,933,201			4,217,589
Intangible assets, net	6,602,884			7,146,680
Goodwill	10,642,707			16,368,388
Receivable from Highbury House plc	—			50,903,501
Total assets	$	36,144,705		$	89,941,683

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2,552,423		$	4,114,947
Accrued expenses and deferred revenue	8,865,976			6,462,697
Other creditors	405,373			426,793
Payable to Highbury House plc	—			3,413,116
Income taxes payable	94,000			—
Total current liabilities	11,917,772			14,417,553

Other long-term liabilities (Highbury House plc)	—			32,035,520

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)	—			—

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 6,903 shares of Series D preferred stock issued and outstanding at September 30, 2005 (liquidation preference of $12,779,266 at September 30, 2005)	4,306,520			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 7,149,578 shares issued at September 30, 2005	71,496			—
Additional paid-in capital	111,880,321			—
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock	(2,296,953		)	—
Accumulated deficit	(86,129,248		)	—
Treasury stock (at cost), 1,335,722 shares at September 30, 2005	(2,417,657		)	—
Cumulative translation adjustment	(1,187,546		)	—
Owners’ net investment	—			43,488,610
Total stockholders’ equity	24,226,933			43,488,610
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	36,144,705		$	89,941,683

	Ergo			Predecessor Nexus Media
	June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,313,986		$	1,710,235
Trade receivables (net of allowance of doubtful accounts at June 30, 2005: $55,411 and December 31, 2004: $276,000)	5,249,052			6,851,599
Inventory	382,820			554,818
Deferred taxes	—			422,836
Prepaid and other current assets	4,423,127			1,766,037
Total current assets	16,368,985			11,305,525
Property & equipment, net	3,920,961			4,217,589
Intangible assets, net	6,748,592			7,146,680
Goodwill	10,783,438			16,368,388
Receivable from Highbury House plc	—			50,903,501
Total assets	$	37,821,976		$	89,941,683
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,851,543		$	4,114,947
Accrued expenses and deferred revenue	11,424,097			6,462,697
Other creditors	681,932			426,793
Payable to Highbury House plc	—			3,413,116
Income taxes payable	94,000			—
Total current liabilities	14,051,572			14,417,553
Other long-term liabilities (Highbury House plc)	—			32,035,520
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
6,903 shares of Series D preferred stock issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 (liquidation preference of $12,592,252 at June 30, 2005)	4,306,520			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;
7,149,578 shares issued at June 30, 2005	71,496			—
Additional paid-in capital	111,880,321			—
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock	(2,296,953		)	—
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings	(86,718,988		)	—
Treasury stock (at cost), 1,335,722 shares at June 30, 2005	(2,417,657		)	—
Cumulative translation adjustment	(1,054,335		)	—
Owners’ net investment	—			43,488,610
Total stockholders’ equity	23,770,404			43,488,610
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	37,821,976		$	89,941,683

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

					~~Predecessor~~			Predecessor
	Ergo			Ergo	~~Nexus Media~~			Nexus Media			Nexus Media		Nexus Media
	Three months ended June 30, 2005				Three months ended March 31, 2005			Three months ended June 30, 2004			Six months ended June 30, 2004
	Three months ended September 30, 2005			Six months ended September 30, 2005				Three months ended March 31, 2005			Three months ended September 30, 2004		Nine months ended September 30, 2004
Net revenues	$	8,403,095			$	6,584,877		$	9,196,130		$	16,868,601
								As Restated
Cost of revenues	5,892,227				6,048,974			6,081,615			12,275,584
Net revenues	$	10,907,195		$	19,366,713			$	6,584,877		$	10,219,151	$	27,102,971
Gross profit	2,510,868				535,903			3,114,515			4,593,017
Cost of revenues	7,657,179			13,703,360				5,922,761			8,164,424		20,614,000
Operating expenses:
Gross profit	3,250,016			5,663,353				662,116			2,054,727		6,488,971
General and administrative	3,124,413				1,648,391			2,113,186			4,059,461
Operating expenses:
Amortization of intangibles	51,967				52,951			50,598			102,077
General and administrative	2,556,571			5,656,840				1,648,391			1,566,547		5,626,842
Impairment of intangibles	—				—			49,694			100,253
Amortization of intangibles	51,203			103,195				52,951			50,939		153,007
Total operating expenses	3,176,380				1,701,342			2,213,478			4,261,791
Impairment of intangibles	—			—				—			50,030		150,275
Net operating (loss) income	(665,512		)		(1,165,439		)	901,037			331,226
Total operating expenses	2,607,774			5,760,035				1,701,342			1,667,516		5,930,124
Other Income:
Net operating income (loss)	642,242			(96,682		)		(1,039,226		)	387,211		558,847
Interest income	28,328				69,971			56,380			113,742
Other Income:
Net (loss) income before taxes	(637,184		)		(1,095,468		)	957,417			444,968
Interest and other income	56,975			85,882				69,971			62,570		176,310
Income tax expense (benefit)	456,102				(80,639		)	324,843			169,377
Net income (loss) before taxes	699,217			(10,800		)		(969,255		)	449,781		735,157
Net (loss) income	$	(1,093,286	)		$	(1,014,829	)	$	632,574		$	275,591
Income tax expense (benefit)	—			449,614				(42,775		)	133,222		255,037
Loss per common share:
Net income (loss)	$	699,217		$	(460,414	)		$	(926,480	)	$	316,559	$	480,120
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.19	)
Net income (loss) per common share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	$	0.12		$	(0.08	)
Basic and Diluted	5,813,856
Diluted	$	0.12		$	(0.08	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	5,813,856			5,813,856
Diluted	5,819,328			5,813,856

The accompanying ~~notes~~ notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				Predecessor
	Ergo Science Consolidated Six months ended September 30, 2005			Nexus Media Three months ended March 31, 2005			Nexus Media Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	Ergo Science Consolidated Three months ended June 30, 2005			Nexus Media Three months ended March 31, 2005			Nexus Media Six months ended June 30, 2004
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	3,153,526		(1,575,574		)	$	(481,203	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	2,296,849			(1,575,574		)	(22,690		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(4139,~~697~~368		)	(112,438		)	(~~238~~155,~~702~~564		)
Proceeds on disposal of property and equipment	—			—			7273,~~448~~210
Acquisition of Nexus Media	(2221,~~032~~201,~~581~~216		)	—			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(2221,~~037~~340,~~278~~584		)	(112,438		)	(~~166~~82,~~254~~354		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(1918,~~740~~187,~~429~~058		)	(1,688,012		)	(~~188~~563,~~944~~557		)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents	(81121,~~631~~177		)	(22,223		)	1314,~~263~~072
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	$	26,136,046		$	1,710,235		$	733,879
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	67,~~313~~827,~~986~~811		$	—		$	~~558~~184,~~198~~394

The accompanying ~~notes~~ notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Nature of of Operations

Ergo Science Corporation (the “Company” or “Ergo”) acquired the business to business publishing division (“Bcom” or “Nexus Media Communications” or “Nexus Media”) of Highbury House Communications plc (“Highbury House”), a company organized under the laws of the United Kingdom on April 1, 2005. The purchase price of GBP 12.5 million (approximately $23.395 million) was subject to a ~~post-closing~~£1.041 ~~adjustment~~million ~~based on~~(approximately ~~the~~$1.958 ~~actual~~million) working capital ~~of Nexus Media on the date of the closing~~adjustment. At closing therefore, the Company paid Highbury House ~~GBP~~ GBP 11.459 million (approximately $21.555 million),. After ~~which~~completion ~~represented~~ the ~~estimated~~ ~~amount of the~~ final working ~~purchase~~capital ~~price~~amount ~~for~~was ~~Nexus~~confirmed ~~Media~~and ~~after~~an ~~such adjustment.~~additional ~~The~~ working capital adjustment was ~~determined~~made to bethe Company in the amount of GBP 464,000 (approximately $873,000), ~~favorable~~which towe ~~the Company with this additional amount to be~~ received ~~sometime~~ in the third quarter. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2005, the Company had paid a total of $2221,~~032~~201,~~581 related to the Nexus Media acquisition~~216, which includes $~~477~~519,000 in capitalized acquisition costs. The acquisition was funded by the Company with its own cash and cash equivalents. Nexus Media, comprising eight wholly-owned subsidiaries provides information across a diverse range of sectors including printed and web-based magazines, data services and directories, staging exhibitions, conferences and award ceremonies.

Nexus Media’s business includes: 13 trade names (including: Checkout; Electrical Times; Independent Grocer; The Motor Ship; World Travel Guide; and Motor Trader); 150 domain names (including: columbusguides.com; groweroftheyear.com; harpers-wine.com; motorship.com; motortrader.com; travel-guide.com; and worldfish.com); approximately 45 magazine titles (including: Motor Trader; World Fishing Magazine; Export Times; Checkout; World Travel Guide; Television World; and Electronics World); and approximately 35 exhibitions (including: ~~European~~ ~~Hotel Design Awards;~~ The International Wine & Spirit Competition; The Retail Industry Awards; Quality Food and Drinks Awards; and Europe Power Conference and Exhibition).

Nexus Media operates its magazines, events and other publications under the following legal entities:

• Nexus ~~Business~~ Business Communications Limited

• Nexus ~~Business~~ Business Media Limited

• Nexus Media Communications Limited

• Columbus ~~Travel~~ Travel Publishing Limited

• Harpers Wines & Spirits Limited

• The International Wine and Spirit Competition Limited

• Nexus Commercial Media Limited

• Nexus Business Limited

2. Basis of of Presentation

The acquisition of ~~Nexus~~ Nexus Media by Ergo is being treated as a purchase business combination for accounting purposes. In accordance with Rule 405 of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Regulation C, the historical statements of Nexus Media have become the historical ~~financials~~financial statements of Ergo, the registrant. As such, for comparative and presentation purposes, this Form 10-Q includes a condensed consolidated balance sheet (Ergo and Nexus Media) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2005 and a a Nexus Media stand alone condensed combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2004. The statement of operations includes a condensed consolidated statement for the three ~~months~~ and six month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 (Ergo and Nexus Media) and for comparative purposes includes the Nexus Media stand alone combined statement of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month periods ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2004 and the three ~~months~~month period ended March 31, 2005. The statement of cash flows includes a condensed consolidated statement (Ergo and Nexus Media) for the ~~three~~six ~~months~~month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 and for comparative ~~purposes~~ purposes includes the Nexus Media stand alone condensed combined statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the Nexus Media stand alone condensed combined statement of cash flows for the ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month period ended September ~~June~~ 30, 2004.

Prior to the acquisition by Ergo, Nexus Media was not a stand alone legal entity. Therefore the condensed combined financial statements of Nexus Media have been derived from the aggregation of the financial information of the individual businesses that comprise Nexus Media and the accounting records of Highbury House. Accordingly, stockholders’ equity represents Highbury House’s net investment in Nexus Media and is described as “Owners’ net investment”.

6individual businesses that comprise Nexus Media and the accounting records of Highbury House. Accordingly, stockholders’ equity represents Highbury House’s net investment in Nexus Media and is described as “Owners’ net investment”.

The accompanying financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and SEC regulations for interim financial information. Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The interim financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 and 2004.

In the opinion of ~~the~~ the Company, results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the fiscal year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of Nexus Media (Bcom) for the year ended December 31, 2004, which are contained in Form 8-K/A filed with the ~~Securities~~SEC ~~and Exchange Commission~~ on June 17, 2005.

Revenue recognition

The Company considers amounts to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Business publication revenue and pre-publication costs are recognized on the mailing date of the publication. Similarly, Competition or Event revenue is recognized on the date the actual event takes place. Any income received or costs incurred are deferred until such dates. Subscription revenue is recognized over the period of the subscription.

Cost recognition

Direct and ~~incremental~~ incremental magazine costs are deferred until the magazines are mailed to the customer, at which point they are expensed in the income statement. Direct and incremental event costs, ~~such as event prepayments~~ and salary costs, are deferred until the date on which the event commences and are then expensed in the income statement. Where it is anticipated that an event will be loss making, the total anticipated loss on the event is recognized in the period when management consider a loss likely.

3. Stock Based Compensation

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) requires that companies either recognize compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments based on fair value, or provide pro forma disclosure of net income or loss and earnings or loss per share in the notes to the financial statements. The Company follows the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and applies APB Opinion 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its employee plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock option plans since all options issued were for a fixed number of shares and had fixed exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. The effects of applying SFAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not likely to be representative of the effects on reported income or loss for future years. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates as calculated in accordance with SFAS 123, the Company’s net loss and loss per share for the three ~~months~~and six month periods ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005. would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

	Three months ended June 30, 2005
Net loss:
As reported	$	1,093,286
Stock-based compensation included in reported net loss, net of related tax	—
Pro forma employee stock compensation expense	4,286
Pro forma net loss	$	1,097,572
Net loss per share—basic and diluted
As reported	$	0.19
Pro forma	0.19

	Three months ended September 30, 2005		Six months ended September 30, 2005
Net income (loss):
As reported	$	699,217	$	(460,414	)
Stock-based compensation included in reported net income (loss), net of related tax	—		—
Pro forma employee stock compensation expense	2,426		6,712
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	696,791	$	(467,126	)
Net income (loss) per share—basic diluted
As reported	$	0.12	$	(0.08	)
Pro forma	$	0.12	$	(0.08	)
Net income (loss) per share—diluted
As reported	$	0.12	$	(0.08	)
Pro forma	$	0.12	$	(0.08	)

The fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2005
Expected Life	5 years
Expected Volatility	50	%
Dividend Yield	0	%
Weighted Average Risk-free Interest Rate	6.0	%

~~During~~No stock options were granted during the three month period ended September 30, 2005. During the three month period ~~ending~~ended June 30, 2005, the Company granted 22,500 stock options to a director of the Company at the current fair market value on the date of the grant. Those options vest annually over a five year period.

4. Acquisition of Nexus Media Communications

As discussed in Note 1, on April 1, 2005, the Company acquired Nexus Media Communications from Highbury House. The purchase price allocation is as follows, however, this remains provisional since certain matters relating to Highbury House continue to be finalized:

The preliminary purchase price allocation is approximately as follows:

Description	April 1, 2005
Assets:
Trade receivables	$	5,028,628
Inventory	691,129
Other current assets	3,158,837
Property and equipment	4,196,130
Goodwill	11,354,786
Trademarks and intangible assets	7,149,215
Total assets acquired	$	31,578,725
Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,723,615
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses	8,532,239
Total liabilities	10,255,854
Net assets acquired	$	21,322,871

Represented by:
Cash paid at closing	$	21,555,267
Acquisition costs	640,604
Working capital adjustment refund	(873,000		)
	$	21,322,871

Description	April 1, 2005
Assets:
Trade receivables	$	5,028,628
Inventory	691,129
Other current assets	3,158,837
Property and equipment	4,196,130
Goodwill	11,354,786
Trademarks and intangible assets	7,149,215
Total assets acquired	$	31,578,725
Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,723,615
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses	8,532,239
Total liabilities	10,255,854
Net assets acquired	$	21,322,871
Represented by:
Cash paid at closing	$	21,555,267
Acquisition costs	640,604
Working capital adjustment to be refunded	(873,000		)
	$	21,322,871

The unaudited pro ~~forma~~ forma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of of Nexus Media and Ergo for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 and the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2004 as though the companies had been combined as of ~~the beginning of~~ January 1, 2004. The pro forma financial information is presented for information purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of each period, or that may result in the future.

	Six months ended June 30, 2005			Three months ended June 30, 2004		Six months ended June 30, 2004
	Nine months ended September 30, 2005			Three months ended September 30, 2004		Nine months ended September 30, 2004
Revenue	$	1426,~~987~~031,~~972~~258		$	910,~~196~~219,~~130~~151	$	1627,~~868~~102,~~601~~971
Net (loss) income	(21,~~151~~403,~~534~~388		)	~~456~~191,~~236~~362		(~~192~~113,~~778~~446		)
(Loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.37	)	$	0.08	$	(0.03	)
(Loss) income per common share	$	(0.16	)	$	0.03	$	0.02

85. Cash and Cash Equivalents

5The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were comprised of amounts held in cash and money market accounts.

~~The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents~~6. Non Cash ~~and cash equivalents at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were comprised of amounts held in cash and money market accounts.~~Transactions

6During the three months ended March 31, 2005, Nexus Media entities declared two dividends totaling £14,920,567 (approx. ~~Non~~ ~~cash~~$28,216,000). The ~~transactions~~balance with Highbury House group companies at March 31, 2005, included this amount, which was settled as part of the acquisition by Ergo.

~~During~~In the three months ended March 31, 2005, Nexus Media recorded ~~entities~~a ~~declared~~profit ~~two~~of ~~dividends totaling~~ £144,~~920~~564,~~567~~475 ~~(approx.~~on ~~$28,216,000). The~~the ~~balance~~sale ~~with~~by a Nexus Media entity of Highbury Nexus ~~House~~Special ~~group~~Interests Limited. This ~~companies~~has asbeen ataccounted ~~March 31,~~for ~~2005,~~as ~~including~~a ~~this~~capital ~~amount,~~contribution ~~was~~through ~~settled~~Owners’ asnet ~~part~~investment ofand the ~~acquisition~~resulting bybalance ~~Ergo~~with Highbury House was also settled on the acquisition.

~~In the three months ended March 31, 2005, Nexus Media made a profit of £4,564,475 on the sale by a Nexus Media entity of Highbury Nexus Special Interests Limited~~7. Net ~~This~~Loss ~~has~~Per ~~been accounted~~Common ~~for as a capital contribution through Additional Paid In Capital and the resulting balance with Highbury House was also settled on the acquisition.~~Share

7Basic earnings/loss per common share is computed by dividing net income/loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. ~~Net~~ Diluted earnings per common share is computed ~~Loss~~by ~~Per~~dividing ~~Common~~net ~~Share~~income by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus all potentially dilutive securities, such as stock options.

~~Basic~~For ~~earnings/loss~~the ~~per~~three months ~~common~~ended ~~share~~September is30, ~~computed~~2005, bya ~~dividing~~total ~~net~~of ~~income/loss~~5,472 bystock option shares were included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding ~~for~~calculation ~~the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed~~because bythese ~~dividing~~shares ~~net~~had ~~income~~exercise byprices ~~the~~less ~~sum~~than of the ~~weighted~~ average ~~number~~market value of ~~common~~the ~~shares~~Company’s ~~outstanding~~common stock for the ~~period~~three ~~plus~~month ~~all~~period ~~potentially~~ended ~~dilutive~~September ~~securities~~30, ~~such~~ ~~as stock options~~2005.

During the ~~three~~six ~~months~~month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005, options to purchase 50,875 shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share since their inclusion would be antidilutive as a result of the net loss incurred. The exercise price range for the excluded 50,875 shares was $1.56 - $13.42.

Earnings/loss per share is is not calculated for the predecessor periods since the predecessor did not comprise a stand alone legal group but was part of a larger entity, Highbury House, with no outstanding shares of its own on which EPS could be calculated. Furthermore, the ~~acquisition~~ acquisition was financed by cash rather than the issuance of common shares.

~~8. Comprehensive (loss) income:~~9

~~The following table shows~~8. Comprehensive ~~the computation of comprehensive~~ (~~loss~~Loss) ~~income~~Income:

				Predecessor
	Ergo			Nexus Media			Nexus Media			Nexus Media
	Three months ended June 30, 2005			Three months ended March 31, 2005			Three months ended June 30, 2004			Six months ended June 30, 2004
Net (loss) income	$	(1,093,286	)	$	(1,014,829	)	$	632,574		$	275,591
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(1,054,335		)	(358,920		)	(605,759		)	(586,883		)
Total comprehensive (loss) income	$	(2,147,621	)	$	(1,373,749	)	$	26,815		$	311,292

The following table shows the computation of comprehensive (loss) income:

9. Income taxes

							Predecessor
	Ergo			Ergo			Nexus Media			Nexus Media			Nexus Media
	Three months ended September 30, 2005			Six months ended September 30, 2005			Three months ended March 31, 2005			Three months ended September 30, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
							As restated
Net income (loss)	$	699,217		$	(460,414	)	$	(926,480	)	$	316,559		$	480,120
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(124,524		)	(1,187,546		)	(345,980		)	(82,650		)	(670,812		)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	574,693		$	(1,647,960	)	$	(1,227,460	)	$	233,909		$	(192,692	)

The provision for taxes based on income for the three months ended June 30, 2005, the three months ended March, 31, 2005 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was computed in accordance with Interpretation No9. Income 18 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28 on reporting taxes for interim periods and was based on management’s expectation of an effective tax rate of approximately 25% for the period ending December 31, 2005.Taxes

~~Income~~The ~~tax~~provision ~~expense~~for ~~was~~taxes ~~$456,102~~based inon income for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 aswas ~~the~~computed ~~deferred tax asset~~ in ~~Nexus~~accordance ~~Media~~with ~~that~~Interpretation ~~was~~No. ~~recorded~~18 as of ~~March~~Accounting ~~31,~~Principles ~~2005~~Board ~~was~~Opinion ~~provided against~~No. ~~This~~28 ~~resulted~~on ~~from~~reporting ~~the~~taxes ~~issuance~~for ofinterim ~~unsecured~~periods ~~10%~~and ~~fixed~~was ~~rate~~based ~~loan~~on ~~notes~~management’s expectation of ~~Nexus~~an ~~Holdings~~effective ~~Limited~~tax torate ~~Ergo~~ of ~~£10~~ ~~million~~approximately ~~post~~25% ~~acquisition.~~for ~~As a result of~~ the ~~interest~~period onending ~~the~~December ~~notes~~31, ~~the recovery of the asset is no longer estimated to be more likely than not~~2005.

Income tax expense was $0 for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 and $449,614 for the six month period ended September 30, 2005. The six month expense of $449,614 was principally the result of a valuation allowance being recorded against the deferred tax asset in Nexus Media that was recorded as of March 31, 2005 and was provided against. This resulted from the issuance of unsecured 10% fixed rate loan notes of Nexus Holdings Limited to Ergo of £10 million post acquisition. ~~Recently~~ As a ~~Issued~~result ~~But~~of ~~Not~~the ~~Yet~~interest ~~Adopted~~on ~~Accounting~~the ~~Pronouncements~~notes, the recovery of the asset is no longer estimated to be more likely than not.

~~In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No~~10. ~~123 (“SFAS~~ Commitments No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company is still evaluating the transition provisions allowed by SFAS No. 123 (R) and will adopt it in the first quarter of 2006. The financial statement impact is not expected to be materially different from that shown in the existing pro forma disclosure required under the original SFAS No. 123. The issuance of additional stock options in the future will cause SFAS 123(R) to have a greater impact on our financial statements.Contingencies

9The Company’s subsidiary, Nexus Media, has subleased two properties in the United Kingdom. In the event of a default on the lease, the Company would have a contingent liability of £247,000 (approximately $437,000).

~~ITEM 2~~11. ~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION~~ Recently ~~AND~~Issued ~~ANALYSIS~~But OFNot ~~FINANCIAL~~Yet ~~CONDITION~~Adopted Accounting ~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~Pronouncements

~~Management’s~~In December 2004, ~~discussion~~the FASB revised SFAS No. 123 (“SFAS ~~and~~No. 123(R)”). ~~analysis~~SFAS ofNo. 123(R), ~~financial~~Share-Based Payment, ~~condition~~requires ~~and~~all ~~results~~share-based payments to employees, including grants of ~~operations~~employee ~~should~~stock options, to be ~~read~~recognized in ~~conjunction~~ ~~with~~ the ~~historical~~ financial statements based ~~and~~on ~~footnotes~~their offair ~~the Company,~~values. ~~included~~Pro informa ~~its~~disclosure ~~Annual~~is ~~Report~~no onlonger ~~Form~~an ~~10-K~~alternative ~~for~~to financial ~~the~~statement ~~year~~recognition. ~~ended~~SFAS ~~December 31,~~No. 123(R) ~~2004,~~is ~~and~~effective offor ~~Nexus~~periods beginning ~~Media,~~after ~~included~~December in15, ~~the~~2005. The Company’s ~~Current~~is ~~Report~~still onevaluating ~~Form~~the ~~8-K/A~~transition ~~filed~~provisions onallowed ~~June~~by ~~17,~~SFAS ~~2005~~No. ~~The~~ 123 (R) and will adopt it in the ~~results~~first quarter of ~~operations~~2006. ~~may~~The ~~change~~financial statement impact is not expected to be materially different from that shown in the ~~historical~~existing ~~results~~pro offorma disclosure ~~operations~~required ~~reflected~~under the original SFAS No. 123. The issuance of additional stock options in the ~~historical~~future ~~financial~~will ~~statements~~cause ofSFAS ~~Ergo~~123(R) orto ~~Nexus~~have a greater impact on our ~~Media~~financial statements.

~~Overview~~10

Ergo Science Corporation (the “Company” or “Ergo”) acquired (the “Acquisition”) the business to business publishing division (“Bcom” or “Nexus Media Communications” or “Nexus Media”) of Highbury House Communications plc (“Highbury House”), a company organized under the laws of the United Kingdom on April 1, 2005. The purchase price of GBP 12.~~5 million (approximately $23.395 million) was subject to a post-closing~~ Restatement ~~adjustment based on the actual working capital~~ of ~~Nexus~~Financial Media on the date of the closing. At closing, the Company paid Highbury House GBP 11.459 million (approximately $21.555 million), which represented the estimated amount of the final purchase price for Nexus Media after such adjustment. The working capital adjustment was determined to be GBP 464,000 (approximately $873,000) favorable to the Company with this additional amount to be received sometime in the third quarter. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had paid a total $22,032,581 related to the Acquisition, which includes $477,000 in capitalized acquisition costs. The Acquisition was funded by the Company with its own cash and cash equivalents. Nexus Media, comprising eight wholly-owned subsidiaries, provides information across a diverse range of sectors including printed and web-based magazines, data services and directories, staging exhibitions, conferences and award ceremonies.Statements

~~Nexus Media’s~~On ~~business~~November 14, ~~includes:~~2005, 13the ~~trade~~Company ~~names~~concluded ~~(including:~~that ~~Checkout; Electrical~~the ~~Times;~~Company’s ~~Independent~~previously ~~Grocer;~~issued ~~The~~financial ~~Motor~~statements ~~Ship;~~as ~~World~~filed ~~Travel~~in ~~Guide;~~its ~~and Motor~~Form 10-Q ~~Trader);~~for ~~150~~the ~~domain~~quarterly ~~names~~period ~~(including:~~ended ~~columbusguides.com;~~June 30, ~~groweroftheyear.com; harpers-wine.com;~~2005 ~~motorship.com;~~including ~~motortrader.com;~~information ~~travel-guide.com; and~~referenced ~~worldfish.com);~~below ~~approximately~~should 45no ~~magazine~~longer ~~titles~~be ~~(including:~~relied ~~Motor~~upon ~~Trader; World~~because ~~Fishing~~of ~~Magazine;~~errors ~~Export~~in ~~Times;~~those ~~Checkout; World Travel Guide; Television~~financial ~~World;~~statements and ~~Electronics~~should ~~World);~~be ~~and~~restated ~~approximately~~to 35reflect ~~exhibitions~~necessary ~~(including:~~accounting ~~European Hotel Design Awards;~~ adjustments. The ~~International~~adjustments ~~Wine~~do ~~& Spirit Competition;~~not ~~The~~affect ~~Retail~~the ~~Industry~~Company’s ~~Awards;~~reported ~~Quality~~revenues, ~~Food~~its ~~and~~cash ~~Drinks~~flows ~~Awards;~~or ~~and~~its ~~Europe Power~~cash/liquidity ~~Conference and Exhibition)~~position.

AtIn ~~Ergo’s~~accordance ~~Annual~~with ~~Meeting~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of ~~Stockholders~~America, ~~held~~certain onsales and marketing costs pertaining ~~October~~to ~~15,~~future ~~2001~~events and publications are required to be expensed. However, ~~stockholders~~during fiscal ~~approved~~year ~~the~~2004 ~~imposition~~and fiscal year 2005 only some of ~~transfer~~these ~~restrictions~~costs were expensed in onthe ~~its~~proper ~~common~~reporting ~~stock~~periods (by the business-to-business publishing division (referred to herein as “~~Transfer~~Nexus ~~Restrictions~~Media”), ~~which~~recently ~~are~~acquired ~~contained~~by inthe Company from ~~Article~~Highbury ~~XII~~House ofCommunications ~~the~~plc, ~~Company’s~~a ~~Certificate~~company oforganized ~~Incorporation~~under (the laws of the United Kingdom (“~~Certificate~~Highbury House”). ~~The Transfer~~Nexus ~~Restrictions~~Media ~~were~~consisted ~~implemented~~of oneight ~~October~~wholly-owned 19subsidiaries of Highbury House, ~~2001~~which before tothe ~~preserve~~acquisition had not prepared quarterly separate or consolidated financial statements. The errors arose primarily because of certain ~~valuable~~sales and ~~tax~~marketing ~~benefits~~costs ~~(the~~relating ~~“Tax~~to ~~Benefits”)~~future events or publications during fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2005 by Nexus Media were deferred to ~~which~~and expensed in subsequent periods when they should have been expensed during the ~~Company~~period isin which ~~entitled~~they were incurred.

~~Effective~~The ~~May 18, 2005, the board of directors (the “Board”) of the~~ Company, acting by unanimous consent (the “Unanimous Consent”), and taking into consideration that the Tax Benefits will not begin to expire until 2008, that the Company’s ability to retain the Tax Benefits is subject to limitations resulting from, among other things, an ownership change (an “Ownership Change”) as defined in Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute (collectively, the “Code”), that the value of the Tax Benefits could be reduced if an Ownership Change occurs, and that the Transfer Restrictions likely decrease the possibility of an Ownership Change, determined ~~(the~~ ~~“Determination”)~~ that ~~modifying~~ the ~~definition~~errors ofresulted ~~“Expiration Date” set forth~~ in ~~Article XII.(1) of~~ the ~~Certificate and extending that date through~~following ~~2007 was in the best interests of the Company and both reasonably necessary and desirable to preserve the Tax Benefits.~~adjustments:

As• the understatement aof ~~result~~cost of revenues and the overstatement of net income before ~~Determination,~~tax ~~the~~of ~~Board~~Nexus ~~modified~~Media of $169,875; and the ~~text~~overstatement of ~~Article~~net ~~XII.~~income ~~(1)~~and total assets of Nexus Media of $118,913, for the ~~Certificate~~ tosix ~~read~~month asperiod ~~follows:~~ended June 30, 2004;

• the ~~following~~ ~~restrictions~~overstatement ~~shall~~of ~~apply~~cost ~~until the earlier~~ of ~~(x)~~revenues ~~the~~and ~~day after~~ the ~~sixth~~understatement ~~(6th) anniversary~~ of ~~the~~net ~~effective~~income ~~time of the~~before ~~merger~~tax of ~~the Corporation’s parent corporation~~$126,213; ~~a Delaware corporation, with~~ and ~~into~~ the ~~Corporation~~overstatement ~~pursuant to Section 253~~ of the ~~Delaware~~net ~~General Corporation~~loss ~~Law~~and (the ~~“Merger”) (y) the~~understatement ~~repeal~~ of ~~Section 382 of~~ the ~~Code~~total ifassets ~~the board~~ of ~~directors~~Nexus ~~determines~~Media ~~that~~of ~~the restrictions~~$88,348, ~~in this Article XII are no longer necessary~~ for the ~~preservation of~~three ~~the~~month ~~Tax~~period ~~Benefits~~ended March 31, ~~and~~2005; ~~(z)~~and

10• the understatement of cost of revenues and the overstatement of net income before tax of the Company of $116,445; and the understatement of net loss and the overstatement of total assets of the Company of $109,477, for the three month period ended June 30, 2005.

~~the beginning of a~~The ~~taxable~~following ~~year~~tables ofsets ~~the~~forth ~~Corporation to which~~ the ~~board~~effects of ~~directors~~the ~~determines~~restatement ~~that~~adjustments nodiscussed ~~Tax~~above ~~Benefits~~on ~~may~~the beCondensed ~~carried~~Consolidated ~~forward,~~Statement ~~unless the board~~ of ~~directors~~Operations ~~shall~~for ~~fix~~Nexus anMedia ~~earlier or later date in accordance with Section 5 of this Article XII~~ (~~the date~~Predecessor) onfor ~~which~~ the ~~restrictions~~three ofmonths ~~this~~ended ~~Article~~March 31, ~~XII expire hereunder is sometimes referred to herein as the “Expiration Date.”)~~2005:

The day after the sixth anniversary of the effective date of the merger is October 20, 2007. Additionally, the Board extended the Expiration Date until October 20, 2007.

	Nexus Media			Nexus Media
	Three months ended March 31, 2005			Three months ended March 31, 2005
	As Previously Reported			As Restated

Net revenues	$	6,584,877		$	6,584,877
Cost of revenues	6,048,974			5,922,761
Gross profit	535,903			662,116
Operating expenses:
General and administrative	1,648,391			1,648,391
Amortization of intangibles	52,951			52,951
Total operating expenses	1,701,342			1,701,342
Net operating loss	(1,165,439		)	(1,039,226		)
Other Income:
Interest income	69,971			69,971
Net loss before taxes	(1,095,468		)	(969,255		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	(80,639		)	(42,775		)
Net loss	$	(1,014,829	)	$	(926,480	)

~~Risk~~In addition, ~~Factors~~the Company expects to file and amendment to its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Second Quarter 10-Q”) to more fully amend and restate the financial statements previously filed in the Second Quarter.

~~The market for Nexus Media’s products and services is competitive.~~11

~~The competition~~ITEM ~~for~~2. ~~Nexus Media~~MANAGEMENT’sS ~~products~~DISCUSSION ~~and~~AND ~~services~~ANALYSIS isOF ~~highly~~FINANCIAL ~~fragmented~~CONDITION ~~by product~~AND ~~offering~~RESULTS ~~and~~OF by geography. On a global level, larger international firms operate in many geographic markets and have broad product offerings in trade shows, conferences, publications and direct marketing products and other.OPERATIONS

~~Within each~~Management’s ~~particular~~discussion ~~industry~~and ~~sector,~~analysis ~~Nexus~~of ~~Media~~financial ~~also~~condition ~~competes~~and ~~with~~results aof ~~large~~operations ~~number of~~should ~~small~~be toread ~~medium-sized~~in ~~firms.~~conjunction ~~While~~with ~~most~~the ~~small~~historical tofinancial ~~medium-sized~~statements ~~firms~~of ~~operate~~the inCompany, aincluded ~~single geographic market or industry sector,~~ in ~~some cases,~~ its ~~competitors operate~~Annual inReport ~~several~~on ~~geographic~~Form ~~markets~~10-K ~~and/or~~for ~~industry~~the ~~sectors.~~year ~~Its~~ended ~~trade~~December ~~shows~~31, ~~and~~2004, ~~conferences compete with trade associations~~ and, inof ~~several~~Nexus ~~markets~~Media, ~~with exposition~~included ~~hall~~in ~~owners~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~operators.~~Current ~~Its~~Report ~~publications~~on ~~typically have between~~Form ~~two~~8-K/A ~~and~~filed ~~five~~on ~~direct~~June ~~competitors that target the same industry sector~~17, ~~and it~~2005. The ~~also~~results ~~has~~of ~~many~~operations ~~indirect~~may ~~competitors~~change ~~that~~materially ~~define~~from ~~niche~~the ~~markets~~historical ~~differently~~results ~~than~~of itoperations ~~does~~reflected ~~and~~in ~~thus~~the ~~may~~historical ~~provide~~financial ~~alternatives~~statements ~~for~~of ~~readers~~Ergo ~~and/~~or ~~advertisers~~Nexus Media.

~~Nexus Media has not previously acted as a stand-alone company.~~Overview

Ergo Science Corporation (the “Company” or “Ergo”) acquired the business to business publishing division (“Bcom” or “Nexus Media Communications” ~~has~~or no“Nexus ~~history~~Media”) of ~~operating~~Highbury asHouse aCommunications ~~stand-alone~~plc ~~company~~(“Highbury House”), ~~and~~a itcompany ~~may~~organized beunder ~~unable~~the tolaws ~~make~~of the ~~changes~~United ~~necessary~~Kingdom ~~to operate as a~~on ~~stand-alone~~April ~~company~~1, or2005. itThe ~~may~~purchase ~~incur~~price ~~greater~~of ~~costs~~GBP as12.5 amillion ~~stand-alone~~(approximately ~~company~~$23.395 ~~that~~million) ~~may~~was ~~cause~~subject ~~its~~to ~~profitability~~a to£1.041 ~~decline~~million (approximately $1. 958 million) working ~~Nexus~~capital ~~Media~~adjustment. ~~has~~At ~~been~~closing ~~operated~~therefore, bythe Company paid Highbury House asGBP 11.459 amillion ~~division~~(approximately of$21.555 ~~its~~million). After completion the ~~broader~~final ~~publishing~~working ~~organization~~capital ~~rather~~amount ~~than~~was asconfirmed aand ~~separate~~an ~~stand-alone company. Highbury~~additional ~~House~~working ~~assisted~~capital ~~Nexus~~adjustment ~~Media~~was bymade ~~performing~~to ~~various~~the ~~corporate~~Company ~~functions,~~in ~~including~~the ~~public~~amount ~~relations~~of GBP 464, ~~employee~~000 ~~relations~~(approximately $873,000), which ~~financing~~we ~~and~~received ~~legal~~in ~~and~~the ~~tax~~third ~~functions~~quarter. ~~Following~~ ~~the~~As ~~Acquisition~~of September 30, ~~Highbury~~2005, ~~House~~the ~~has~~Company nohad ~~obligation~~paid toa ~~provide~~total ~~these~~$21,201,216 ~~functions~~related to ~~Nexus~~the ~~Media~~acquisition, which includes $519,000 in capitalized acquisition costs. If ~~Nexus~~The ~~Media~~Acquisition ~~does~~was ~~not~~funded ~~have~~by inthe Company ~~place~~with its own ~~systems~~ cash and ~~business~~cash ~~functions~~equivalents. orNexus ifMedia, itcomprising ~~does~~eight wholly-owned ~~not~~subsidiaries, ~~have~~provides ~~agreements~~information ~~with~~across ~~other providers~~a ofdiverse ~~these~~range ~~services,~~of sectors ~~Nexus~~including ~~Media~~printed ~~may~~and ~~not~~web-based bemagazines, ~~able~~data toservices ~~effectively operate~~and ~~its~~directories, ~~business~~staging ~~and~~exhibitions, ~~its~~conferences ~~profitability~~and ~~may~~award ~~decline~~ceremonies.

~~Trade~~Nexus Media’s ~~Show~~business ~~exhibit~~includes: ~~space~~13 trade names (including: Checkout; Electrical Times; Independent Grocer; The Motor Ship; World Travel Guide; and adMotor ~~pages~~Trader); ~~could~~150 ~~decline~~domain asnames a(including: ~~result~~columbusguides.com; ofgroweroftheyear.com; harpers-wine.com; anmotorship.com; ~~economic~~motortrader.com; ~~slowdown~~travel-guide.com; inand worldfish.com); ~~the~~approximately ~~United~~45 ~~Kingdom,~~magazine titles (including: Motor Trader; ~~future~~World ~~terrorist~~Fishing ~~attacks,~~Magazine; orExport ~~geopolitical~~Times; ~~concern~~Checkout; World Travel Guide; Television World; and Electronics World); and approximately 35 exhibitions (including: The International Wine & Spirit Competition; The Retail Industry Awards; Quality Food and Drinks Awards; and Europe Power Conference and Exhibition).

~~Nexus~~At ~~Media~~Ergo’s ~~customers~~Annual ~~typically reduce their~~Meeting ~~marketing~~of ~~and~~Stockholders ~~advertising~~held ~~budgets~~on ~~during~~October a15, ~~general~~2001, ~~economic~~stockholders ~~downturn~~approved ~~or a recession in~~ the ~~United Kingdom or in any other market where Nexus Media~~imposition ~~conducts a significant amount~~ of ~~business. The~~transfer ~~longer~~restrictions aon ~~recession~~its orcommon ~~economic~~stock ~~downturn continues~~ (the ~~more~~“Transfer ~~likely~~Restrictions”), ~~it becomes~~which ~~that~~are ~~Nexus~~contained ~~Media’s~~in ~~customers~~Article ~~may significantly reduce their marketing~~XII ~~and~~of ~~advertising budgets. Any material decrease in marketing budgets could reduce~~ the ~~demand for exhibition space and also reduce attendance at Nexus Media~~Company’s ~~trade~~Certificate ~~shows~~of ~~and~~Incorporation ~~conferences. In addition, any material decrease in advertising budgets could reduce~~ (the ~~demand for advertising space in Nexus Media’s publications~~“Certificate”). AsThe aTransfer ~~result,~~Restrictions ~~Nexus~~were ~~Media’s~~implemented ~~revenue~~on ~~and~~October ~~its cash flow from operations could decrease significantly. In addition~~19, ~~Nexus~~2001 ~~Media’s~~to ~~integrated marketing~~preserve ~~strategy~~certain ~~could~~valuable betax ~~materially~~benefits ~~adversely~~(the ~~affected~~“Tax ifBenefits”) ~~advertising revenue cannot support one or more of its important publications or if declines in its customers’ marketing and advertising budgets require it~~ to ~~discontinue~~ ~~one~~which orthe ~~more~~Company ofis ~~its important trade shows or conferences~~entitled.

~~Further~~Effective May ~~terrorist~~18, ~~attacks~~2005, ~~and~~the ~~continued~~Board ~~geopolitical concern~~of Directors (~~including~~the ~~conflict~~“Board”) inof the ~~Middle~~Company, ~~East~~acting by unanimous consent (the “Unanimous Consent”), ~~may~~and ~~significantly~~taking ~~affect~~into ~~Nexus~~consideration that ~~Media~~the Tax Benefits will not begin to expire until 2008, that the Company’s ability ~~future~~to ~~results~~retain ofthe ~~operations~~Tax orBenefits ~~financial~~is ~~condition,~~subject ~~whether~~to aslimitations aresulting from, among ~~result~~other ofthings, an ownership change (1an “Ownership Change”) ~~reduced~~as ~~attendance~~defined ~~at,~~in Sections or382 ~~curtailment~~and or383 ~~cancellation~~of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, ~~trade shows~~as ~~due~~amended from time to ~~travel fears~~time, or any successor statute (2collectively, the “Code”), ~~further~~that ~~reduction~~the invalue ~~economic~~of the ~~activity~~Tax Benefits could be reduced if an Ownership Change occurs, and athat the ~~related~~Transfer ~~reduction~~Restrictions inlikely ~~marketing~~decrease ~~expenditures~~the onpossibility ~~publications~~of oran ~~trade~~Ownership ~~shows~~Change, determined or(the “Determination”) that modifying the definition of “Expiration Date” set forth in Article XII.(31) ~~other~~of ~~circumstances~~the Certificate and extending that ~~could~~date through ~~result~~2007 ~~from~~was ~~these~~in orthe ~~subsequent~~best ~~attacks~~interests of the Company and both reasonably necessary and desirable to preserve the Tax Benefits.

11As a result of the Determination, the Board modified the text of Article XII. (1) of the Certificate to read as follows:

~~Nexus~~the ~~Media~~following ~~depends~~restrictions onshall ~~securing~~apply ~~desirable~~until ~~dates~~the earlier of (x) the day after the sixth (6th) anniversary of the effective time of the merger of the Corporation’s parent corporation, a Delaware corporation, with and ~~locations~~into the Corporation pursuant to Section 253 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “Merger”) (y) the repeal of Section 382 of the Code if the Board of Directors determines that the restrictions in this Article XII are no longer necessary for ~~its~~the ~~trade~~preservation of ~~shows~~the ~~and~~Tax ~~conferences~~Benefits, ~~which~~and it(z) ~~may~~the ~~not~~beginning beof ~~able~~a totaxable year of the Corporation ~~secure.~~to which the board of directors determines that no

The date and location of a trade show or a conference can impact Nexus Media profitability and prospects. The market for desirable dates and locations is highly competitive. If Nexus Media cannot secure desirable dates and locations for its trade shows and conferences, profitability and future prospects would suffer, and its financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In general, Nexus Media maintains multi-year reservations for its trade shows and conferences. Consistent with industry practice, it does not pay for these reservations, and these reservations are not binding on the facility owners until Nexus Media executes a contract with the owner. Nexus Media typically signs contracts that guarantee the right to venues or dates for only one year. Therefore, multi-year reservations may not lead to binding contracts with facility owners. In addition, because trade shows and conferences are held on pre-scheduled dates at specific locations, the success of a particular trade show or conference depends upon events outside Nexus Media’s control, such as natural catastrophes, labor strikes and transportation shutdowns.12

~~Nexus~~Tax ~~Media’s~~Benefits ~~trade~~may ~~shows~~be carried forward, unless the Board ~~conferences~~of ~~and~~Directors ~~publishing~~shall ~~revenues~~fix ~~vary~~an ~~due~~earlier toor ~~the~~later ~~movement~~date ofin ~~annual~~accordance ~~events~~with Section 5 of orthis ~~publication~~Article ~~mailing~~XII ~~dates~~(the ~~and~~date on which the ~~timing~~restrictions of ~~its~~this ~~customers’~~Article ~~product~~XII ~~launches~~expire hereunder is sometimes referred to herein as the “Expiration Date”).

~~Nexus~~The ~~Media’s~~day ~~trade~~after ~~shows,~~the ~~conferences~~sixth ~~and~~anniversary ~~publishing revenues~~of ~~are seasonal, due primarily to~~ the ~~timing~~effective date of ~~its large trade shows and conferences and~~ the ~~mailing~~merger ~~dates~~is ofOctober ~~its~~20, ~~magazines and industry directories~~2007. ~~Because~~ ~~event~~Additionally, ~~revenues are recognized when a particular event is held and publication revenues are recognized in~~ the ~~month~~Board ~~publications~~extended ~~are mailed, Nexus Media may also experience fluctuations in quarterly revenues based on~~ the ~~movement~~Expiration ofDate ~~annual~~until ~~events~~October or20, ~~mailing dates from one quarter to another~~2007.

InOn ~~addition~~October 24, ~~Nexus~~2005, ~~Media’s~~J. ~~trade show and conference~~Warren ~~revenues~~Huff ~~may~~resigned ~~fluctuate~~ from ~~period~~the toBoard ~~period~~of ~~based~~Directors onof the ~~spending~~Company, ~~patterns~~and ~~of its~~from ~~customers.~~the ~~Many~~Audit Committee ofand ~~its~~the ~~large~~Compensation ~~customers~~Committee ~~concentrate~~of ~~their~~the ~~trade~~Board ~~show participation~~of ~~around~~Directors ~~major~~of ~~product launches~~the Company. Mr. ~~Because~~Huff ithad ~~cannot~~no ~~always~~disagreements with ~~know~~the Company or ~~predict~~ ~~when~~ its ~~large~~management ~~customers~~relating ~~intend~~ to ~~launch~~the ~~new~~Company’s ~~products~~operations, ~~it is difficult~~ topolicies ~~anticipate~~or ~~any related fluctuations in trade show and conference revenues~~practices.

~~Nexus~~On ~~Media~~October ~~depends~~25, in2005, ~~part on~~the ~~new~~Board ~~product~~of ~~introductions,~~Directors ~~and~~of the ~~process~~Company ofelected ~~researching,~~Ling ~~developing,~~Kwok to the Board of Directors ~~launching~~of ~~and~~the ~~establishing~~Company ~~profitability~~to ~~for~~fill athe ~~new~~vacancy ~~event~~left orby ~~publication~~Mr. isHuff’s resignation. Mr. Kwok has served as Vice President, ~~inherently~~Corporate ~~risky~~Development ~~and~~of ~~costly~~the Company since December 1, 2003.

~~Nexus~~Risk Media’s success depends in part upon ability to monitor rapidly changing market trends and to adapt events and publications to meet the evolving needs of existing and emerging target audiences. Future success will depend in part on Nexus Media’s ability to continue to adapt existing events and publications and to offer new events and publications by addressing the needs of specific audience groups within its target markets. The process of researching, developing, launching and establishing profitability for a new event or publication is inherently risky and costly. Nexus Media generally incurs initial operating losses when it introduces new events and publications. Efforts to introduce new events or publications may not ultimately be successful or profitable. In addition, costs related to the development of new events and publications are accounted for as expenses, so year-to-year results may be materially adversely affected by the number and timing of new product launches.Factors

The market for Nexus Media’s ~~overall~~products ~~operations~~and ~~may~~services beis ~~adversely affected by risks associated with international operations~~competitive.

The competition for Nexus Media’s ~~primary~~products ~~operations~~and ~~are~~services inis ~~the~~highly ~~United~~fragmented by product offering ~~Kingdom~~and by geography. ~~The~~On ~~following~~a ~~risks~~global inlevel, larger international ~~markets~~firms ~~could~~operate ~~have~~in ~~a material~~many ~~adverse~~geographic ~~effect~~markets onand ~~Nexus~~have ~~Media’s~~broad ~~future~~product ~~international~~offerings ~~operations~~in ~~and~~trade shows, ~~consequently~~conferences, onpublications ~~its~~and ~~business,~~direct ~~results~~marketing ofproducts ~~operations~~ and ~~financial condition:~~other.

~~• general~~Within each ~~economic~~particular industry sector, Nexus Media also competes with a large number of small to medium-sized firms. While most small to medium-sized firms operate in a single geographic market or industry sector, in some cases, its competitors operate in several geographic markets and/or ~~political~~industry ~~uncertainties~~sectors. Its trade shows and ~~potential~~conferences compete with trade associations and, in several markets, with exposition hall owners and operators. Its publications typically have between two and five direct competitors that target the same industry sector, and it also has many indirect competitors that define niche markets differently than it does and thus may provide alternatives for ~~social~~readers ~~unrest;~~and/or advertisers.

~~• limitations on~~Nexus ~~our~~Media ~~ability~~has tonot ~~enforce~~previously ~~legal~~acted ~~rights~~as ~~and~~a stand-alone ~~remedies;~~company.

~~• state~~Prior to April 1, 2005, Nexus Media had no history of operating as a stand-~~imposed~~alone company, and it may be unable to make the changes ~~restrictions~~necessary onto operate as a stand-alone company, or it may incur greater costs as a stand-alone company that may cause its profitability to decline. Nexus Media had been operated by Highbury House as a division of its broader publishing organization rather than as a separate stand-alone company. Highbury House assisted Nexus Media by performing various corporate functions, including public relations, employee relations, financing and legal and tax functions. Following the ~~repatriation~~Acquisition, Highbury House had no obligation to provide these functions to Nexus Media. If Nexus Media is unable to implement own systems and business functions or if it does not have agreements with other providers of ~~funds;~~these services, Nexus Media may not be able to effectively operate its business and its profitability may decline.

~~• potentially~~Trade Show exhibit space and ad pages could ~~adverse~~decline ~~tax~~as ~~consequences~~a result of an economic slowdown in the United Kingdom, future terrorist attacks, or geopolitical concern.

12Nexus Media’s customers typically reduce their marketing and advertising budgets during a general economic downturn or a recession in the United Kingdom or in any other market where Nexus Media conducts a significant amount of business. The longer a recession or economic downturn continues the more likely it becomes that Nexus Media’s customers may significantly reduce their marketing and advertising budgets. Any material decrease in marketing budgets could reduce the demand for exhibition space and also reduce attendance at Nexus Media’s trade shows and conferences. In addition, any material decrease in advertising budgets could reduce the demand for advertising space in Nexus Media’s publications. As a result, Nexus Media’s revenue and its cash flow from operations could decrease significantly. In addition, Nexus Media’s integrated marketing strategy could be materially adversely affected if advertising revenue cannot support one or more of its important publications or if declines in its customers’ marketing and advertising budgets require it to discontinue one or more of its important trade shows or conferences.

~~Reliance on principal vendors could adversely affect business.~~13

~~Nexus~~Further ~~Media~~terrorist ~~relies~~attacks onand continued ~~principal~~geopolitical ~~vendors~~concern (~~principally paper~~including ~~and~~conflict ~~print~~in ~~vendors~~the ~~and~~Middle ~~distributors~~East) ~~and their ability or willingness to~~may ~~sell~~significantly ~~products~~affect toNexus itMedia’s onfuture ~~favorable~~results ~~price~~of ~~and~~operations ~~other~~or ~~terms.~~financial condition, ~~Many~~whether ~~factors~~as ~~outside~~a result of ~~Nexus~~ ~~Media’s~~(1) ~~control~~reduced ~~may~~attendance ~~harm~~at, ~~these~~or ~~relationships~~curtailment ~~and the ability~~ or ~~willingness~~cancellation of, ~~these~~trade ~~vendors~~shows todue ~~sell these products~~ to ittravel onfears, ~~such~~(2) ~~terms. If~~further ~~any~~reduction ~~of its principal vendors discontinues~~in oreconomic ~~temporarily~~activity ~~terminates~~and ~~its~~a ~~services~~related ~~and~~reduction itin ismarketing ~~unable~~expenditures toon ~~find adequate~~publications ~~alternatives,~~or ~~Nexus~~trade ~~Media may experience increased prices~~shows, ~~interruptions~~or ~~and delays~~(3) inother ~~services.~~circumstances ~~These~~that ~~factors~~ could ~~adversely~~result ~~affect~~from ~~business~~these or subsequent attacks.

~~Increases~~Nexus inMedia ~~paper~~depends oron ~~postage costs~~securing ~~could~~desirable ~~cause~~dates and ~~Nexus~~locations ~~Media’s~~for ~~expenses~~its totrade ~~increase~~shows and conferences, which it may ~~adversely~~not ~~affect~~be able to ~~business~~secure.

~~Paper~~The date and ~~postage~~location ~~are~~of ~~necessary~~a ~~expenses~~trade show ~~relating~~or ~~to print~~a ~~products~~conference can impact Nexus Media profitability and ~~magazine~~prospects. The ~~distribution~~market for desirable dates and locations is highly competitive. If ~~Significant~~Nexus ~~increases~~Media cannot insecure ~~paper~~desirable ~~prices~~dates and locations for its trade shows and orconferences, inprofitability ~~postage~~and ~~prices~~future ~~may~~prospects ~~have~~would ansuffer, ~~adverse~~and ~~effect~~its onfinancial condition ~~business~~and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In general, Nexus Media maintains multi-year reservations for its trade shows and conferences. Consistent with industry practice, it does not ~~use~~pay ~~forward~~for ~~contracts~~these reservations, and ~~all~~these ofreservations ~~its~~are ~~paper~~not ~~supply~~binding ~~vendor~~on ~~arrangements~~the ~~provide~~facility ~~for~~owners ~~price~~until ~~adjustments~~Nexus toMedia ~~reflect~~executes ~~prevailing~~a ~~market~~contract ~~prices.~~with Ifthe owner. Nexus Media ~~cannot~~typically ~~pass~~signs ~~significant~~contracts ~~increases~~that inguarantee the ~~paper~~right ~~and~~to ~~postage~~venues ~~costs~~or ~~through~~dates for only one year. Therefore, multi-year reservations may not lead to binding contracts ~~its~~with ~~customers,~~facility ~~its~~owners. In ~~financial~~addition, because ~~condition~~trade shows and ~~results~~conferences are held on pre-scheduled dates at specific locations, the success of ~~operations~~a ~~could~~particular betrade show or conference depends upon ~~materially~~events ~~adversely~~outside ~~affected~~Nexus Media’s control, such as natural catastrophes, labor strikes and transportation shutdowns.

Nexus Media’s ~~may~~trade ~~not~~shows, beconferences ~~able~~and publishing revenues vary due to the movement of annual events or publication ~~protect~~mailing dates and the timing of its ~~intellectual~~customers’ ~~property~~product launches.

Nexus Media’s ~~relies~~trade onshows, conferences ~~copyright~~ and ~~trademark rights to protect its~~ publishing ~~products.~~revenues ~~Effective~~are ~~trademark and copyright protection may be unavailable or limited~~seasonal, ordue ~~Nexus~~primarily ~~Media~~to ~~may~~the ~~not have applied~~timing ~~for~~of ~~such~~its ~~protection~~large intrade ~~the~~shows ~~United~~and ~~States~~conferences orand ~~abroad.~~the Inmailing ~~addition,~~dates ~~Nexus~~of ~~Media has~~its ~~been,~~ magazines and ~~may~~industry indirectories. ~~the~~Because ~~future~~event ~~be,~~revenues ~~notified~~are ofrecognized ~~claims~~when ~~that its publishing~~a ~~products~~particular ~~may~~event ~~infringe~~is ~~trademarks,~~held ~~copyrights,~~and ~~patents~~publication ~~and/or~~revenues ~~other~~are ~~intellectual property~~recognized ~~rights~~in ofthe ~~others.~~month publications ~~Such~~are ~~claims~~mailed, ~~including~~Nexus ~~any~~Media ~~related~~may ~~litigation,~~also ~~could result~~experience fluctuations in quarterly ~~significant~~revenues ~~expense~~based toon ~~Nexus~~the ~~Media~~movement ~~and~~of ~~adversely~~annual ~~affect~~events ~~its cash flow, whether~~ or ~~not~~mailing ~~such~~dates ~~litigation~~from one isquarter ~~resolved~~to ~~in its favor~~another.

~~Results~~In addition, Nexus Media’s trade show and conference revenues may fluctuate from period to period based on the spending patterns of ~~Operations~~its customers. Many of its large customers concentrate their trade show participation around major product launches. Because it cannot always know or predict when its large customers intend to launch new products, it is difficult to anticipate any related fluctuations in trade show and conference revenues.

~~Prior to the acquisition of~~ Nexus Media ondepends ~~April 1, 2005, the Company had no trading operations, having sold its previous operations~~ in ~~November~~part ~~2003. As~~on anew ~~result, Nexus Media is considered to be~~product ~~the predecessor. To assist in the understanding of the results of operations of the Company~~introductions, ~~management~~and ~~have presented supplemental historical results of Nexus Media. For~~ the ~~purpose~~process of ~~management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations~~researching, ~~management have combined the Company’s results for the three months ended June 30~~developing, ~~2005~~launching ~~with that of Nexus Media for the three months ended March 31, 2005~~ and ~~compared that to the~~ ~~results~~establishing ofprofitability ~~Nexus Media~~ for ~~the~~a ~~six~~new ~~months~~event ~~ended~~or ~~June~~publication ~~30, 2005. The table~~ is ~~found~~inherently ~~preceding the discussion~~risky ofand ~~the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005~~costly. ~~Management believes that this provides the most meaningful analysis of the Company’s results for the six months ended June 30, 2005.~~

~~For~~Nexus Media’s success depends in part upon its ability to monitor rapidly changing market trends and to adapt events and publications to meet the ~~Three~~evolving ~~Months~~needs ~~Ended~~of ~~June~~existing 30and emerging target audiences. Future success will depend in part on Nexus Media’s ability to continue to adapt existing events and publications and to offer new events and publications by addressing the needs of specific audience groups within its target markets. The process of researching, ~~2005~~developing, launching and establishing ~~2004~~profitability for a new event or publication is inherently risky and costly. Nexus Media generally incurs initial operating losses when it introduces new events and publications. Efforts to introduce new events or publications may not ultimately be successful or profitable. In addition, costs related to the development of new events and publications are accounted for as expenses, so year-to-year results may be materially adversely affected by the number and timing of new product launches.

Revenue. Revenue decreased to $8,403,095 from $9,196,130 for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The decrease of approximately $800,000, which is substantially all volume-related rather than price-related, was primarily the result of declines in both advertising revenue of $1,000,000 and subscription revenue of $300,000, offset by increases principally in event revenue of $500,000. The Nexus Media’s ~~Communications revenue~~overall isoperations ~~approximately~~may ~~52%~~be ~~from advertising in 2004. Management has been~~adversely ~~transitioning~~affected ~~the~~by ~~core~~risks ~~business~~associated ~~revenue~~with ~~towards~~international ~~revenue from events, sponsorships and on-line advertising~~operations. Management has not yet increased revenues enough from its non-traditional areas to cover the decreases it has sustained from its traditional advertising and circulation revenue bases. This trend is part of the current general market conditions in the business to business media sector.

~~Gross profit~~Nexus ~~decreased~~Media’s toprimary ~~30% from 34% for the three months period ended June 30,~~operations ~~2005~~are ~~compared~~in ~~with~~ the ~~same~~United ~~period in 2004~~Kingdom. The ~~decrease~~following isrisks ~~due~~in tointernational ~~new~~markets ~~events which traditionally~~ could have ~~resulted~~a ~~in smaller~~material ~~margins~~adverse ~~during~~effect ~~their~~on ~~first~~Nexus ~~year.~~Media’s ~~Gross~~future ~~profit~~international ~~typically increases~~operations ~~during~~and, ~~succeeding~~consequently, ~~years.~~on ~~Gross~~its ~~profit~~business, ~~can~~results ~~be volatile during the year as the timing and frequency~~ of ~~events~~operations ~~can change~~ and ~~vary quarter by quarter.~~financial condition:

~~General~~• general economic and ~~Administrative~~political ~~Expenses. General~~uncertainties and ~~administrative expenses~~potential ~~consist primarily of compensation~~ for ~~personnel,~~social ~~professional services, which include consultants, legal fees, accounting, audit and tax fees, and administrative expenses associated with operating as a public company.~~unrest;

~~General and~~• limitations ~~administrative~~on ~~expenses~~our ~~increased~~ability to ~~$3,124,413~~enforce ~~from~~legal ~~$2,113,186~~rights for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The increase of approximately $1,000,000 represents increased costs as a result of the separation of Nexus Media from its former parent company, Highbury House and increased costs due to fulfilling requirements necessary as a result of being acquired by a US public company of approximately $930,000 and expenses from Ergo Science totaling $176,000 offset by $170,000 of costs savings, primarily recharges from Highbury House in 2004.remedies;

~~Net (loss) income~~• state-imposed ~~decreased~~restrictions toon ~~($1,093,286) from $632,574 for~~ the ~~three~~repatriation ~~month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in net loss~~ of ~~approximately~~funds; ~~1,725,860 is attributable to decreases in revenue as well as increases in general~~ and administrative expenses. Income tax expense was $456,102 in the quarter as the deferred tax asset in Nexus Media was provided against since, following the issuing of unsecured 10% Fixed Rate loan notes of Nexus Holdings Limited to Ergo of £10,100,000, the recovery of this asset is no longer more likely than not.

1314

~~For~~• potentially ~~the~~adverse ~~Six~~tax ~~Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004~~consequences.

~~Statement~~Reliance ofon ~~Operations~~principal ~~(Summary):~~vendors could adversely affect business.

	Ergo Consolidated			Predecessor Nexus Media
	Three months ended June 30, 2005			Three months ended March 31, 2005			Combined Total
Net revenues	$	8,403,095		$	6,584,877		$	14,987,972
Cost of revenues	5,892,227			6,048,974			11,941,201
Gross profit	2,510,868			535,903			3,046,771
Operating expenses	3,176,380			1,701,342			4,877,722
Interest income	28,328			69,971			98,299
Net income (loss) before taxes	(637,184		)	(1,095,468		)	(1,732,652		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	456,102			(80,639		)	375,463
Net income (loss)	$	(1,093,286	)	$	(1,014,829	)	$	(2,108,115	)

Nexus Media relies on principal vendors (principally paper and print vendors and distributors) and their ability or willingness to sell products to it on favorable price and other terms. Many factors outside of Nexus Media’s control may harm these relationships and the ability or willingness of these vendors to sell these products to it on such terms. If any of its principal vendors discontinues or temporarily terminates its services and it is unable to find adequate alternatives, Nexus Media may experience increased prices, interruptions and delays in services. These factors could adversely affect business.

~~Revenue.~~Increases ~~Revenue decreased to $14,987,972 from $16,868,601 for the six month period ended June 30, 2005 compared with the same period~~ in ~~2004. The~~paper ~~decrease~~or ofpostage ~~approximately $1,880,000,~~costs ~~which~~could ~~is substantially all volume-related rather than~~cause ~~price-related, was primarily the result of declines in both advertising revenue of $2,100,000 and subscription revenue of $500,000, offset by increases in event revenue of $720,000. The~~ Nexus Media’s ~~Communications~~expenses revenue is approximately 52% from advertising in 2004. Management has been transitioning the core business revenue towards revenue from events, sponsorships and on-line advertising. Management has not yet increased revenues enough from its non-traditional areas to ~~cover~~increase ~~the decreases it has sustained from its traditional advertising~~ and ~~subscription~~may ~~revenue~~adversely ~~bases. This~~affect ~~trend is part of the current general market conditions in the~~ business ~~to business media sector~~.

~~Gross~~Paper and postage are necessary ~~profit~~expenses ~~decreased~~relating to ~~20%~~print ~~from~~products ~~27%~~and ~~for~~magazine ~~the~~distribution. ~~six~~Significant increases ~~months~~in ~~period~~paper ~~ended~~prices ~~June 30, 2005~~or ~~compared~~in ~~with~~postage ~~the~~prices ~~same~~may ~~period~~have inan ~~2004.~~ adverse effect on ~~The~~business. ~~decrease~~Nexus isMedia ~~due~~does tonot ~~new~~use ~~events~~forward ~~which~~contracts, ~~traditionally~~and ~~have~~all ~~resulted~~of inits paper ~~smaller~~supply ~~margins~~vendor ~~during~~arrangements ~~their~~provide ~~first~~for ~~year~~price adjustments to reflect prevailing market prices. ~~Gross~~If ~~profit~~Nexus ~~typically~~Media cannot pass significant increases in paper and ~~during~~postage ~~subsequent~~costs ~~years~~through to its customers, its financial condition and results of operations ancould ~~event~~be materially adversely affected.

~~General and~~Nexus ~~Administrative~~Media ~~Expenses. General~~may ~~and~~not ~~administrative expenses~~be ~~consist~~able ~~primarily~~to ofprotect ~~compensation for personnel, professional~~its ~~services,~~intellectual ~~which include consultants, legal fees, accounting, audit and tax fees, and administrative expenses associated with operating as a public company~~property.

~~General~~Nexus ~~and~~Media relies on copyright ~~administrative~~and ~~expenses~~trademark ~~increased~~rights to ~~$4,877,722~~protect ~~from~~its ~~$4,059,461~~publishing ~~for~~products. ~~the~~Effective ~~six~~trademark ~~month~~and ~~period~~copyright ~~ended~~protection ~~June 30~~may be unavailable or limited, ~~2005~~or ~~compared~~Nexus Media may not ~~with~~have ~~the~~applied ~~same~~for ~~period~~such protection in ~~2004~~the United States or abroad. ~~The~~ In addition, ~~increase~~Nexus ofMedia ~~approximately~~has ~~$820~~been,~~000~~ ~~represents~~and ~~increased~~may ~~costs~~in asthe afuture ~~result~~be, notified of claims that its ~~the~~publishing ~~separation~~products ofmay ~~Nexus~~infringe ~~Media~~trademarks, ~~from~~copyrights, ~~its~~patents ~~former~~and/or ~~parent~~other intellectual ~~company~~property rights of others. Such claims, ~~Highbury~~including ~~House~~any related ~~and~~litigation, ~~increased~~could ~~costs~~result ~~due~~in tosignificant ~~increased~~expense ~~compliance~~to ~~requirements~~Nexus ~~necessary~~Media asand aadversely ~~result~~affect ofits ~~being~~cash ~~acquired~~flow, bywhether aor USnot ~~public~~such ~~company~~litigation is resolved in its favor.

~~Net~~A ~~(loss)~~material ~~income decreased~~weakness ~~to $(2,108,115) from $275,591 for the six month period ended June 30, 2005 compared with the same period~~ in ~~2004. The~~ increase in net loss of approximately $2,383,706 is attributable to decreases in revenue, decreases in gross profit and increases in general and administrative expenses. Income tax expense was $456,102 in the ~~quarter~~Company’s asinternal ~~the~~controls ~~deferred tax asset in Nexus Media~~could ~~was~~have ~~provided~~a ~~against~~material ~~since,~~adverse ~~following the~~effect ~~issuing~~on ~~of unsecured 10% Fixed Rate loan notes of Nexus Holdings Limited to Ergo of £10,100,000 (approximately $18,109,000),~~ the ~~recovery of this asset is no longer more likely than not~~Company.

14In connection with the quarterly review of the financial statements of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005, the Company and Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, identified certain material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls. The Company recently discovered that the lack of controls in fact resulted in errors under U.S. GAAP in the timing of recognition principally of certain sales and marketing costs relating to future events or publications during fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2005 by Nexus Media. Although the Company believes such errors have been corrected and will be identified in an amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we may identify one or more errors due to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting from time to time in the future. In addition, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, and any projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and results of operations could be harmed, we could fail to be able to provide reasonable assurance as to our financial results or meet our reporting obligations, and there could be a material adverse effect on the price of our securities.

~~Liquidity~~Results ~~and~~of ~~Capital Resources~~Operations

~~For~~Prior to the acquisition of Nexus Media on April 1, ~~reasons~~2005, ~~outlined~~Ergo ~~above~~had no operations, ~~for~~having ceased its previous operations in November 2003. As a result, Nexus Media is considered to be the predecessor. To assist in the understanding of the results of operations of the Company, management has presented supplemental historical results of Nexus Media. For the purpose of management’s discussion and analysis of ~~liquidity~~financial condition and ~~capital~~results ~~resources~~of operations, ~~in the table below~~ management have ~~combined~~ combined the Company’s ~~cash~~results ~~flows~~ for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005 with that of Nexus Media for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and compared ~~that~~ that to the ~~cash~~results ~~flows~~ of Nexus Media for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2004~~2005. The table is found preceding the discussion of the results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Management believes that this provides the most meaningful analysis of the Company’s ~~cash~~results ~~flows~~ for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005.

~~Statement~~For ofthe ~~Cash~~Three ~~Flows (Summary):~~Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004

	Ergo Consolidated Three months ended June 30, 2005			Predecessor
				Nexus Media Three months ended March 31, 2005			Combined Total
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	2,296,849		$	(1,575,574	)	$	721,275
Net cash (used in) investing activities	(22,037,278		)	(112,438		)	(22,149,716		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(19,740,429		)	(1,688,012		)	(21,428,441		)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents	(81,631		)	(22,223		)	(103,854		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	26,136,046			1,710,235			27,846,281
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	$	6,313,986		—			$	6,313,986

Revenue. Revenue increased to $10,907,195 from $10,219,151 for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The increase of approximately $700,000 was driven by an increase in events revenue of approximately $2,000,000, which consisted of revenue from the Commercial Fishing Exhibition of approximately $2,200,000, offset by a decline in European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communications (“ECOC”) revenue of approximately $300,000, and market driven declines in advertising revenues of approximately $1,200,000.

~~Resources~~The Commercial Fishing Exhibition is one of Nexus Media’s most significant events – second only to the World Fishing Exhibition held every six years in Vigo, Spain which Nexus Media also ran on a contract basis on the last two occasion’s l997 and 2003. Commercial Fishing is still the most important industry in Iceland and the fishing exhibition – run on a three year cycle – is the most important event in the national calendar.

On April 1, 2005, the Company used $21,555,267 of its own cash to complete the transaction of acquiring Nexus Media. The Company also incurred approximately $640,000 of transaction costs related to the acquisition, of which $477,000 was paid as of June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had $6,313,986 of cash and cash equivalents.15

The ~~Company’s~~2005 UKCommercial ~~subsidiary,~~Fishing ~~Nexus~~Exhibition ~~Media~~was ~~Communications~~our ~~Limited~~most ~~has~~successful ato ~~net~~date. ~~overdraft~~The ~~facility~~revenue ofis £2predominantly ~~million~~derived ~~(approximately~~from ~~$3.8~~stand ~~million)~~space ~~bearing~~sales ~~interest~~of ~~at 2% above base rate,~~ the ~~term of which is 364 days from March 29~~6,000 ~~2005~~square ~~although~~meter ~~the facility~~venue ~~will~~with ~~remain~~approximately on60% ~~demand. The~~of ~~amount drawn-down on~~ the ~~facility~~exhibitors isfrom ~~required~~Iceland towith bethe ~~covered~~rest bycoming ~~good trade debtors of~~from ~~less~~35 ~~than~~different ~~90 days at all times~~countries. ~~There is no outstanding balance drawn down on this facility as of June 30, 2005.~~

~~Cash~~ECOC ~~provided~~is bythe ~~(used~~European ~~in) operating~~optical ~~activities~~communication ~~was~~event serving ~~$2,296,849 for~~ the ~~three~~fiber ~~month~~optic ~~period~~communications ~~ended~~technology ~~June 30, 2005~~industry ~~compared~~and toit ~~$(135,280)~~presents ~~for~~ the ~~three-month period ended June 30,~~ ~~2004. Working~~latest ~~capital~~and ~~usage~~future ~~improved~~optical incommunications ~~both~~components, ~~2004~~products, ~~and~~systems ~~2005 as would be~~and ~~expected~~services. The ~~for~~event ~~the~~consists ~~cyclical nature~~ of ~~this~~a ~~business. Cash~~large exhibition ~~inflows~~and ~~increased in~~technical ~~the~~conference ~~quarter~~which asrotates aaround ~~result~~Europe ofand ~~cash~~has ~~received~~been inan annual ~~advance~~event for the ~~major~~past ~~events that~~32 ~~are~~years. ~~scheduled~~This toevent ~~occur~~generated in$1,600,000 ~~the second half~~ of ~~this~~revenue in ~~fiscal~~2005, ~~year.~~a Inreduction ~~2004 this~~of ~~favorable~~$286,000, ~~movement~~primarily ~~was~~due ~~masked~~to ~~since~~the ~~working~~market ~~capital~~driven ~~was~~decline ~~managed by~~in ~~Highbury~~the ~~House~~telecommunication industry.

~~Cash~~Advertising ~~provided~~revenues declined by ~~(used~~$1,200,000 in~~) operating~~ ~~activities~~the ~~was~~quarter ~~$721,275~~substantially ~~for~~due ~~the~~to ~~six-month~~volume ~~period~~rather ~~ended June 30,~~than ~~2005~~price ~~compared~~decreases. toThe ~~$(22,690)~~Nexus ~~for~~Media ~~the~~Communications ~~six-month~~revenue ~~period~~is ~~ended~~approximately ~~June 30, 2004.~~52% ~~Working~~from ~~capital~~advertising ~~usage improved~~ in ~~both~~ 2004. ~~and~~Management ~~2005~~has asbeen ~~would~~transitioning ~~be expected for~~ the ~~cyclical~~core ~~nature of this~~ business~~. Cash inflows increased in the~~ ~~six~~revenue ~~month~~towards ~~period~~revenue asfrom aevents, ~~result~~sponsorships ofand ~~cash~~on-line ~~received~~advertising. Management inhas ~~advance~~not ~~for~~yet ~~the~~increased ~~major events~~revenues ~~that~~enough ~~are~~from ~~scheduled~~its tonon-traditional ~~occur~~areas into cover the ~~second~~decreases ~~half~~it ofhas ~~this~~sustained from ~~fiscal~~its ~~year.~~traditional Inadvertising ~~2004~~base. ~~this~~This ~~favorable~~trend ~~movement~~is ~~was~~part ~~masked~~of ~~since~~the ~~working~~current ~~capital~~general ~~was~~market ~~managed~~conditions byin the ~~Highbury~~business ~~House~~to business media sector.

~~Net~~Gross ~~cash~~profit ~~used~~increased ~~in investing~~to ~~activities~~30% ~~was~~for ~~$22~~the three month period ended September 30,~~149,716~~ ~~constituting~~2005 from 20% for the ~~$22~~three month period ended September 30,~~032,581~~ ~~acquisition~~2004. ofThis increase is primarily driven by the ~~Nexus~~Commercial ~~Media~~Fishing ~~business~~Expedition ~~and~~which ~~$117,135~~generated ofa ~~capital~~gross ~~spend~~profit of $1,481,000.

~~The~~General and ~~Group’s~~Administrative ~~use~~Expenses. General ofand ~~cash~~administrative ~~has~~expenses ~~fluctuated~~consist ~~significantly~~primarily ~~principally~~of ~~due~~compensation tofor ~~the~~personnel, ~~timings of events with~~professional ~~revenue~~services, ~~being~~which ~~received~~include inconsultants, ~~cash~~legal ~~prior~~fees, toaccounting, ~~related~~audit ~~creditors~~and ~~being incurred or~~tax ~~settled. It~~fees, isand ~~anticipated~~administrative ~~that~~expenses ~~this pattern~~associated ~~may~~with ~~continue~~operating inas ~~the~~a ~~foreseeable future~~public company.

15General and administrative expenses increased to $2,556,571 from $1,566,547 for the three month period ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The increase of approximately $1,000,000 represents increased costs as a result of the separation of Nexus Media from its former parent company, Highbury House and increased costs due to fulfilling requirements necessary as a result of being acquired by a US public company of approximately $450,000 and expenses of Ergo Science of approximately $550,000.

~~Requirements~~Net income increased to $699,217 from $316,559 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in net income of approximately $382,000 is primarily attributable to increases in gross profit of $1,195,000 offset by increases in operating expenses of approximately $935,000 and an decrease in income tax expense of $133,000.

~~The~~For ~~Company expects that cash generated from our newly acquired operating business will fund our current operations for at least~~ the ~~next~~Nine 12Months ~~months.~~Ended InSeptember ~~the event that the Company purchases an additional business~~30, ~~the~~2005 ~~Company~~and ~~may require additional capital to complete the acquisition.~~2004

~~The~~Statement ~~Company cannot pay dividends on our common stock without first obtaining the written consent~~ of ~~the~~ ~~holders~~Operations ~~of a majority of our outstanding series D exchangeable preferred stock.~~(Summary):

Recently Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

				Predecessor
	Ergo			Nexus Media
	Consolidated Six months ended September 30, 2005			Three months ended March 31, 2005			Combined Total
				As restated
Net revenues	$	19,366,713		$	6,584,877		$	25,951,590
Cost of revenues	13,703,360			5,922,761			19,626,121
Gross profit	5,663,353			662,116			6,325,469

Operating expenses	5,760,035			1,701,342			7,461,377

Interest and other income	85,882			69,971			155,853

Net loss before taxes	(10,800		)	(969,255		)	(980,055		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	449,614			(42,775		)	406,839
Net loss	$	(460,414	)	$	(926,480	)	$	(1,386,894	)

In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We are still evaluating the transition provisions allowed by SFAS No. 123 (R) and will adopt it in the first quarter of 2006. The financial statement impact is not expected to be materially different from that shown in the existing pro forma disclosure required under the original SFAS No. 123. The issuance of additional stock options in the future will cause SFAS 123(R) to have a greater impact on our financial statements.16

16Revenue Revenue decreased to $25,951,590 from $27,102,971 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The decrease of approximately $1,200,000 was primarily the result of declines in both advertising revenue of $2,800,000 and subscription revenue of $500,000 offset by increases in event revenue of $2,100,000.

~~ITEM~~Event 3revenues increases were primarily driven by the Commercial Fishing Exhibition with revenues of $2,200,000 offset by a decline in ECOC revenues of $300,000. ~~QUANTITATIVE~~ New events ~~AND~~generated ~~QUALITATIVE~~the ~~DISCLOSURES~~remaining ~~ABOUT~~$200,000 ~~MARKET~~of ~~RISK~~revenues.

~~Foreign~~Advertising ~~Currency~~revenues declined ~~Exchange~~by ~~Risks~~approximately $2,800,000, which was primarily the result of a decrease in volume rather than a result of pricing. The Nexus Media Communications revenue was approximately 52% from advertising in 2004. Management has been transitioning the core business revenue towards revenue from events, sponsorships and on-line advertising. Management has not yet increased revenues enough from its non-traditional areas to cover the decreases it has sustained from its traditional advertising and circulation revenue bases. This trend is part of the current general market conditions in publishing.

~~The Company’s~~Gross ~~operations~~profit ~~are~~remained ~~conducted principally in the United Kingdom and most~~at of24% ~~the~~for ~~entities in~~ the ~~group~~nine ~~have~~month aperiods ~~functional~~ended ~~currency~~September of30, ~~British~~2005 ~~Pounds~~and 2004.

~~There~~General ~~are~~and ~~principally~~Administrative ~~two~~Expenses. General ~~types~~and ofadministrative expenses ~~foreign~~consist ~~exchange~~primarily ~~risk:~~of ~~transaction~~compensation ~~risks~~for ~~and~~personnel, professional ~~translation~~services, ~~risks.~~which ~~Transaction~~include ~~risks~~consultants, ~~may~~legal ~~impact~~fees, ~~the~~accounting, ~~results~~audit ofand ~~operations~~tax ~~and~~fees, ~~translation~~and ~~risks~~administrative ~~may~~expenses ~~impact~~associated ~~comprehensive~~with ~~income.~~operating ~~These~~as ~~are~~a ~~discussed~~public ~~more fully below~~company.

~~Transaction~~General and ~~risks~~administrative expenses increased to $7,461,377 from $5,626,842 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The increase of approximately $1,830,000 represents increased costs as a result of the separation of Nexus Media from its former parent company, Highbury House and increased costs due to compliance requirements necessary as a result of being acquired by a U.S. public company, partially offset by reductions as a result of general cost controls by Nexus Media.

~~Transactions~~Net income (loss) indecreased ~~currencies~~to ~~other~~$(1,386,894) ~~than~~from $480,120 for the ~~functional~~nine ~~currency~~month ~~are~~periods ~~translated~~ended September at30, ~~either~~2005 ~~the exchange~~and ~~rate~~2004, inrespectively. ~~effect~~The atincrease ~~the~~in ~~end~~net loss of approximately ~~the~~$1,867,000 ~~month~~is inattributable ~~which~~to ~~the~~decreases ~~transaction~~in ~~occurs~~revenue and gross orprofit as well as increases in ~~some~~general ~~cases~~and ~~the~~administrative ~~rate~~expenses. Income intax ~~effect~~expense atin the ~~date~~quarter ofending June 30, 2005 was $449,614 as the ~~transaction. Differences~~deferred tax asset in ~~exchange~~Nexus ~~rates~~Media ~~during~~was ~~the~~provided ~~period~~against ~~between~~due ~~the~~to ~~date~~uncertainty aover ~~transaction~~recoverability ~~denominated~~due into athe ~~foreign~~issuing ~~currency~~of isunsecured ~~consummated~~10% ~~and~~Fixed ~~the~~Rate ~~date~~loan onnotes ~~which~~of itNexus isHoldings ~~settled~~Limited orto ~~translated,~~Ergo ~~are~~of ~~recognized~~£10,100,000 in(approximately ~~the~~$18,109,000), ~~consolidated~~which ~~statements~~means the recovery of ~~operations~~this asasset ~~Nexus~~is ~~Media~~no longer ~~Communications~~more likely than not.

~~Nexus~~Liquidity ~~Media’s cash balances consist of Euros, Icelandic krona, British Pounds~~ and ~~U.S.~~ ~~dollars.~~Capital This exposes the Company to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the Statement of Operations. The change in exposure from period to period is related to the change in the balance of the bank accounts based on timing of event receipts and payments. The Company attempts to use natural hedging in respect of overseas events by holding advance revenues in the relevant foreign currency to the extent that local currency costs are anticipated. At June 30, 2005, the Company held approximately 75 million Icelandic Krona (approx $1.2 million), and 0.3 million U.S dollars in the cash accounts and remains exposed to changes in the foreign currency rate. As of June 30, 2005, a 10% increase or decrease in the level of the Icelandic Krona exchange rate against the British Pound with all other variables held constant would result in a realized gain or loss of approximately $110,000. Such exchange rate fluctuations should have a smaller impact in future as the cash balances will reduce as the majority of the events revenue for the second half has been collected in the first half and costs will be incurred in the second half. Even including the Icelandic Fishing event, which takes place in September and then not for another four years, in excess of 85% of our 2005 revenue is expected to be in sterling.Resources

~~Translation~~For the reasons outlined above, ~~risks~~for the purpose of management’s discussion and analysis of liquidity and capital resources, in the table below management have combined the Company’s cash flows for the six months ended September 30, 2005 with that of Nexus Media for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and compared that to the cash flows of Nexus Media for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Management believes that this provides the most meaningful analysis of the Company’s cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

~~The financial~~Statement ~~statements~~ of ~~Nexus~~Cash ~~Media~~Flows with a functional currency of British Pounds are translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are translated at period-end exchange rates while revenue and expenses are translated at the period’s average exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from these translations are accumulated and reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity.(Summary):

The fluctuation in the exchange rates resulted in foreign currency translation losses reflected as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity of $1,054,335 at June 30 2005. Future changes in the value of the US dollar to British Pound could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

	Ergo			Predecessor
	Consolidated			Nexus Media
	Six months ended September 30, 2005			Three months ended March 31, 2005			Combined Total
				As restated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	3,153,526		$	(1,575,574	)	$	1,577,952
Net cash used in investing activities	(21,340,584		)	(112,438		)	(21,453,022		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(18,187,058		)	(1,688,012		)	(19,875,070		)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents	(121,177		)	(22,223		)	(143,400		)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	26,136,046			1,710,235			27,846,281

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	7,827,811		—			$	7,827,811

~~ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~Resources

~~Disclosure~~On ~~Controls~~April 1, 2005, the Company used $21,555,267 of its own cash to complete the transaction of acquiring Nexus Media. The Company also incurred approximately $640,000 of transaction costs related to the acquisition, of which $519,000 was paid as of September 30, 2005. This was offset by the working capital adjustment of GBP 464,000 (approximately $873,000) favorable to the Company and was received in ~~Procedures~~the third quarter. As of September 30, 2005, the Company had $7,827,811 of cash and cash equivalents.

AsThe ofCompany’s ~~the~~UK ~~end~~subsidiary, ofNexus ~~the~~Media ~~quarterly~~Communications ~~period~~Limited ~~ended~~has ~~June~~a ~~30,~~net ~~2005,~~overdraft ~~our~~facility ~~management,~~of ~~with~~£2 ~~the participation of~~million ~~Charles~~(approximately E$3.6 ~~Finelli,~~million) ~~our~~bearing ~~Chief~~interest ~~Executive~~at ~~Officer~~2% ~~and~~above ~~acting~~base ~~Chief Financial Officer~~rate, ~~evaluated~~ the ~~effectiveness~~ term of ~~our~~which ~~disclosure~~is ~~controls~~364 ~~and procedures. Based~~days onfrom ~~this~~March ~~evaluation~~29, ~~Mr.~~ ~~Finelli~~2005 ~~concluded~~although ~~that~~ the ~~disclosure~~facility ~~controls~~will ~~and~~remain ~~procedures were not~~on ~~effective~~demand. The toamount ~~ensure~~drawn-down ~~that~~on ~~information~~the facility is required to be ~~disclosed~~covered by usgood intrade ~~the reports~~debtors ~~that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act~~ of ~~1934~~less ~~is recorded,~~than ~~processed,~~90 ~~summarized and reported, within the time periods specified~~days inat ~~the~~all ~~Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms~~times. ~~Mr.~~There ~~Finelli’s~~has ~~conclusion~~been ~~was~~no ~~based~~draw ~~principally~~down on ~~the~~this ~~material~~facility ~~weaknesses~~during in the ~~internal~~third ~~controls~~quarter ~~of the Company as identified by the Company~~ and ~~Deloitte~~there &is ~~Touche~~no ~~LLP, our independent~~outstanding ~~registered~~balance ~~public~~as ~~accounting~~of ~~firm~~September 30, ~~and discussed below~~2005.

~~Changes~~Cash provided by (used in) ~~Internal~~operating activities was $1,577,952 for the nine month period ended ~~Control~~September ~~Over~~30, ~~Financial~~2005 ~~Reporting~~compared to $(481,203) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004. The increase in cash provided by operating activities of approximately $2,000,000 was primarily the result of non cash charges for depreciation of approximately $214,000, amortization of approximately $161,000, provision for doubtful accounts of approximately $103,000 and deferred income taxes of approximately $392,000 and changes in working capital accounts of approximately $1,130,000. The positive working capital was primarily the result of a reduction of accounts receivable and accrued expenses due to the cyclical nature of our business.

InNet ~~connection~~cash ~~with~~used ~~the~~in ~~quarterly~~investing ~~review~~activities ofwas ~~the~~$21,453,022 ~~financial~~for ~~statements of~~ the ~~Company~~nine ~~for~~month ~~the~~ period ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2005, ~~the~~compared ~~Company~~to ~~and Deloitte & Touche LLP~~$82,354 ~~our~~for ~~independent registered~~the ~~public~~nine ~~accounting~~month ~~firm,~~period ~~have~~ended ~~identified~~September ~~certain material weaknesses~~30, ~~in the Company’s internal controls~~2004. ~~A material~~ ~~weakness~~The islarge aincrease ~~significant~~in ~~deficiency,~~cash orused ~~combination of significant deficiencies, that results~~ in ~~more~~investing ~~than~~activities awas ~~remote likelihood that a material misstatement of~~ the ~~annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The material weaknesses identified at the Company~~ result ~~from the acquisition~~ of ~~Nexus~~ ~~Media, which before~~ the acquisition ~~had no history~~ of ~~operating~~the asNexus ~~a stand-alone~~Media ~~company~~business ~~and was not required to prepare accounting statements~~ in ~~accordance~~ ~~with accounting principals generally accepted in~~ the ~~United~~second ~~States (“U~~quarter.~~S. GAAP”) or the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).~~

~~Before~~The ~~the~~ Company’s ~~acquisition~~ ofuse ~~Nexus Media on April 1, 2005, Nexus Media consisted~~ of ~~eight entities~~cash ~~that~~has ~~were~~fluctuated ~~privately owned by Highbury House Communications plc, a~~significantly ~~company~~principally ~~organized~~due ~~under~~to the ~~laws~~timings of ~~the~~events ~~United~~with ~~Kingdom,~~revenue ~~and~~being ~~that~~received ~~were operated as part of that group of companies. As a result, a significant number of the controls required~~ in ~~a stand-alone entity,~~cash ~~including~~prior ~~having~~to ~~its~~related ~~own~~creditors ~~chief~~being ~~financial~~incurred ~~officer,~~or ~~were not present at Nexus Media~~settled. ~~Since~~It ~~acquiring~~is ~~Nexus~~anticipated ~~Media,~~that ~~the Company~~this ~~has~~pattern ~~been working to address the material weaknesses identified. Actions taken during the quarterly period~~may ~~ended~~continue ~~June 30, 2005 include actively recruiting an interim chief financial officer of Nexus Media (which resulted~~ in the ~~hiring~~foreseeable ~~of such officer by Nexus after June 30, 2005), engaging third party accountants with U~~future.~~S. GAAP skills to assist with the preparation of SEC reports, and commencing the implementation of the controls expected of a stand-alone entity.~~

18Requirements

~~PART~~The IICompany expects that cash generated from our newly acquired operating business will fund our current operations for at least the next 12 months. In the event that the Company purchases an additional business, the Company may require additional capital to complete the acquisition.

~~OTHER~~The Company cannot pay dividends on our common stock ~~INFORMATION~~without first obtaining the written consent of the holders of a majority of our outstanding series D exchangeable preferred stock.

~~ITEM 1. LEGAL~~Recently ~~PROCEEDINGS~~Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

~~None~~In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We are still evaluating the transition provisions allowed by SFAS No. 123 (R) and will adopt it in the first quarter of 2006. The financial statement impact is not expected to be materially different from that shown in the existing pro forma disclosure required under the original SFAS No. 123. The issuance of additional stock options in the future will cause SFAS 123(R) to have a greater impact on our financial statements.

~~ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS~~18

~~None~~ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

~~ITEM~~Foreign ~~3. DEFAULTS UPON~~Currency ~~SENIOR~~Exchange ~~SECURITIES~~Risks

~~None~~The Company’s operations are conducted principally in the United Kingdom and most of the entities in the group have a functional currency of British Pounds.

~~ITEM~~There 4are principally two types of foreign exchange risk: transaction risks and translation risks. ~~SUBMISSION~~ OFTransaction ~~MATTERS~~risks TOmay Aimpact ~~VOTE~~the OFresults ~~SECURITY~~of ~~HOLDERS~~operations and translation risks may impact comprehensive income. These are discussed more fully below.

~~None.~~Transaction risks

~~ITEM~~Transactions 5in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at either the exchange rate in effect at the end of the month in which the transaction occurs or in some cases the rate in effect at the date of the transaction. ~~OTHER~~ Differences in exchange rates during the ~~INFORMATION~~period between the date a transaction denominated in a foreign currency is consummated and the date on which it is settled or translated, are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as Nexus Media Communications.

~~None~~Nexus Media’s cash balances consist of Euros, Icelandic krona, British Pounds and U.S. dollars. This exposes the Company to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the Statement of Operations. The change in exposure from period to period is related to the change in the balance of the bank accounts based on timing of event receipts and payments. The Company attempts to use natural hedging in respect of overseas events by holding advance revenues in the relevant foreign currency to the extent that local currency costs are anticipated. At September 30, 2005, the Company held approximately 26 million Icelandic Krona (approx $0.4 million), and 0.6 million U.S dollars in the cash accounts and remains exposed to changes in the foreign currency rate. As of September 30, 2005, a 10% increase or decrease in the level of the Icelandic Krona exchange rate against the British Pound with all other variables held constant would result in a realized gain or loss of approximately $42,000. Such exchange rate fluctuations should have a smaller impact in future as the cash balances will reduce as the majority of the events revenue for the second half has been collected in the first half and costs will be incurred in the second half. Even including the Icelandic Fishing event, which took place in September and will take place again in 2008, in excess of 85% of our 2005 revenue is expected to be in sterling.

~~ITEM 6. EXHIBITS~~Translation risks

~~31.1 Certification~~The financial statements of ~~Principal~~Nexus ~~Executive~~Media ~~Officer~~with a functional currency of British Pounds are translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. Accordingly, assets and ~~acting~~liabilities are ~~Principal~~translated ~~Financial~~at ~~Officer~~period-end ~~pursuant~~exchange rates while revenue and expenses are totranslated ~~Exchange~~at ~~Act~~the ~~Rule~~period’s 13average exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from these translations are accumulated and reported as a~~-14(a)~~ component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity.

~~32.1 Certification~~The fluctuation in the ~~Pursuant~~exchange torates 18resulted ~~U.S.C.~~in ~~Section~~foreign ~~1350,~~currency translation losses reflected as ~~adopted~~a component ~~Pursuant~~of toaccumulated ~~Section~~other ~~906~~comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity of $1,187,546 at September 30, 2005. Future changes in the value of the US dollar ~~Sarbanes~~to ~~Oxley~~British ~~Act~~Pound could have a material impact on our financial position and results of ~~2002~~operations.

~~SIGNATURES~~ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~Pursuant to the~~Disclosure ~~requirements~~Controls ofand ~~Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~Procedures

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION
By:		/s/ Charles E. Finelli
		Charles E. Finelli
		President, Chief Executive Officer, and acting Chief Financial Officer,
		Principal Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Date:	August 19, 2005

As of the end of the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, our management, with the participation of Charles E. Finelli, our Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, Mr. Finelli concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Mr. Finelli’s conclusion was based principally on the material weaknesses in the internal controls of the Company as identified by the Company and Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and discussed below.

20Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~INDEX~~In TOconnection with ~~EXHIBITS~~the quarterly review of the financial statements of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005, the Company and Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, identified certain material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The material weaknesses identified at the Company result from the acquisition of Nexus Media, which before the acquisition had no history of operating as a stand-alone company and was not required to prepare accounting statements in accordance with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) or the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

~~ERGO~~Before ~~SCIENCE~~the ~~CORPORATION~~Company’s acquisition of Nexus Media on April 1, 2005, Nexus Media consisted of eight entities that were privately owned by Highbury House Communications plc, a company organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, and that were operated as part of that group of companies. As a result, a significant number of the controls required in a stand-alone entity, including having its own chief financial officer, were not present at Nexus Media. The Company recently discovered that the lack of controls in fact resulted in errors under U.S. GAAP in the timing of recognition principally of certain sales and marketing costs relating to future events or publications during fiscal year 2004 and fiscal year 2005 by Nexus Media.

Exhibit No.		Exhibit
3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
3.2		By-Laws of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-98162) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
4.1		Form of Stock Certificate of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.1		Novated License and Royalty Agreement dated May 1, 1995, between the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, the Registrant, E. Science Incorporated, a Delaware corporation formerly known as Ergo Science Incorporated that is a subsidiary of the Registrant (“Ergo Science Incorporated”), and Ergo Research Corporation, a Delaware corporation that is a subsidiary of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-98162) filed with the Commission on November 27, 1995, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.2		Indemnification Agreement dated October 6, 1995, between the Registrant and Manuel Cincotta, Jr., together with a schedule identifying substantially identical documents and setting forth the material details in which those documents differ from the foregoing document. Filed as exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-98162) filed with the Commission on November 27, 1995, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.3		Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of the Registrant’s officers and directors. Filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.4		Ergo Science Corporation 2001 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5		Ergo Science Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6		Ergo Science Corporation Amended and Restated 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7		Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated October 12, 1993, between Ergo Science Incorporated and Albert H. Meier, Ph.D.; First Amendment to Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated April 27, 1995, among the Registrant, Ergo Science Incorporated and Albert H. Meier, Ph.D.; and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated November 6, 1995, between the Registrant and Albert H. Meier, Ph.D. Filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.8		Option Agreement, dated March 1, 1993, between Ergo Science Incorporated and David R. Burt; First Amendment to Option Agreement, dated April 27, 1995, among the Registrant, Ergo Science Incorporated and David R. Burt; Second Amendment to Option Agreement, dated October 6, 1995, between the Registrant and David R. Burt; and Third Amendment to Option Agreement, dated November 6, 1995, between the Registrant and David R. Burt. Filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.

Since acquiring Nexus Media, the Company has been working to remediate the material weaknesses identified. Actions taken include the hiring of an interim chief financial officer of Nexus Media, engaging third party accountants with U.S. GAAP skills to assist with the preparation of SEC reports, and reorganizing the finance department of Nexus Media. The Company continues to work to implement the internal controls necessary for a stand-alone entity.

2120

10.9		License Agreement effective as of February 1, 1997, between The General Hospital Corporation and Ergo Science Corporation and Ergo Research Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s quarterly filing on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 15, 1997 and incorporated by reference herein. [Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission in accordance with Rule 406 of the Securities Act and the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment.]
10.10		Settlement Agreement dated as of October 6, 2000 between the Registrant and Louisiana State University. Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on April 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2003, by and between the Company and Court Square Capital Limited. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12		Assignment Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2003, by and between the Company and Ergo Verisherungsgruppe AG regarding the sale of the ergo.com domain name. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.13		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2003, by and between the Company and PLIVA d.d regarding the sale of the Company’s intellectual property. Filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 26, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.14		Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, by and between the Company and Highbury House Communications plc regarding the purchase of the business publishing division of Highbury House Communications plc,. Filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
14		Ergo Science Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Filed as Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on March 30, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13 a-14(a).
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

PART II.

22OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13 a-14(a).

32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION


By:	/s/ Charles E. Finelli
	Charles E. Finelli
	President, Chief Executive Officer, and acting Chief Financial Officer,
	Principal Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


Date:		November 21, 2005

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

ERGO SCIENCE CORPORATION

Exhibit No.		Exhibit

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
3.2		By-Laws of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-98162) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
4.1		Form of Stock Certificate of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.1		Novated License and Royalty Agreement dated May 1, 1995, between the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, the Registrant, E. Science Incorporated, a Delaware corporation formerly known as Ergo Science Incorporated that is a subsidiary of the Registrant (“Ergo Science Incorporated”), and Ergo Research Corporation, a Delaware corporation that is a subsidiary of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-98162) filed with the Commission on November 27, 1995, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.2		Indemnification Agreement dated October 6, 1995, between the Registrant and Manuel Cincotta, Jr., together with a schedule identifying substantially identical documents and setting forth the material details in which those documents differ from the foregoing document. Filed as exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-98162) filed with the Commission on November 27, 1995, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.3		Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of the Registrant’s officers and directors. Filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.
10.4		Ergo Science Corporation 2001 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-69172) filed with the Commission on September 7, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5		Ergo Science Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6		Ergo Science Corporation Amended and Restated 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7		Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated October 12, 1993, between Ergo Science Incorporated and Albert H. Meier, Ph.D.; First Amendment to Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated April 27, 1995, among the Registrant, Ergo Science Incorporated and Albert H. Meier, Ph.D.; and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Option Agreement, dated November 6, 1995, between the Registrant and Albert H. Meier, Ph.D. Filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.8		Option Agreement, dated March 1, 1993, between Ergo Science Incorporated and David R. Burt; First Amendment to Option Agreement, dated April 27, 1995, among the Registrant, Ergo Science Incorporated and David R. Burt; Second Amendment to Option Agreement, dated October 6, 1995, between the Registrant and David R. Burt; and Third Amendment to Option Agreement, dated November 6, 1995, between the Registrant and David R. Burt. Filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73222) filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.

10.9		License Agreement effective as of February 1, 1997, between The General Hospital Corporation and Ergo Science Corporation and Ergo Research Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s quarterly filing on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 15, 1997 and incorporated by reference herein. [Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission in accordance with Rule 406 of the Securities Act and the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment.]
10.10		Settlement Agreement dated as of October 6, 2000 between the Registrant and Louisiana State University. Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on April 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2003, by and between the Company and Court Square Capital Limited. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12		Assignment Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2003, by and between the Company and Ergo Verisherungsgruppe AG regarding the sale of the ergo.com domain name. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.13		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2003, by and between the Company and PLIVA d.d regarding the sale of the Company’s intellectual property. Filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 26, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.14		Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, by and between the Company and Highbury House Communications plc regarding the purchase of the business publishing division of Highbury House Communications plc,. Filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
14		Ergo Science Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Filed as Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26988) filed with the Commission on March 30, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13 a-14(a).
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

Filing Compare · ERGO SCIENCE CORP /DE/