UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 2229, 2011

LAWSON SOFTWARE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Commission File Number: 000-51942

Delaware		20-3469219
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

380 St. Peter Street, St. Paul, Minnesota		55102-1302
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (651) 767-7000

Former name or former address, if changed since last report: Not applicable

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2b under the Exchange Act (17CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

~~Item~~Section 5 ~~8.01~~— ~~Other~~Corporate ~~Events~~Governance and Management

~~These~~Item ~~supplemental disclosures to the definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, which we refer to as the definitive proxy statement, filed by Lawson Software, Inc~~5.,07. ~~which~~Submission we refer to as the Company or Lawson, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the SEC, on May 31, 2011, as amended and supplemented by the disclosures contained in the proxy statement supplement, which we refer to as the proxy statement supplement, filed by the Company with the SEC on June 15, 2011, are being made to update certain information and to respond to certain allegations made by plaintiffs in the stockholder litigation relating to the Agreement and Plan of ~~Merger,~~Matters ~~which we refer~~ to ~~as the merger agreement, dated as of April 26, 2011, by and among Lawson, GGC Software Holdings, Inc., which we refer to as Parent, and Atlantis Merger Sub, Inc.,~~ a ~~wholly~~Vote ~~owned subsidiary~~ of ~~Parent,~~Security ~~which we refer to as Merger Sub, providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, which we refer to as the merger~~Holders. ~~Defined terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the definitive proxy statement and the proxy statement supplement.~~

~~SETTLEMENT~~At OFa ~~LITIGATION~~special meeting of stockholders of Lawson Software, Inc. (the “Company”) held on June 29, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 26, 2010 (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, GGC Software Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Atlantis Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company. The stockholders of the Company also voted to approve the non-binding proposal regarding certain merger-related executive compensation arrangements.

~~This~~Set ~~supplemental~~forth ~~disclosure~~below, ~~is being filed in connection~~ with anrespect ~~agreement in principle with the plantiffs~~ to ~~enter~~each ~~into~~such ~~a memorandum of understanding~~proposal, ~~which~~are ~~we refer to as~~ the ~~Minnesota~~number ~~Memorandum~~ of ~~Understanding,~~votes ~~regarding~~cast ~~the~~for ~~settlement~~or of certain litigation relating to the merger agreement. As previously disclosed beginning on pages 6 and 64 of the definitive proxy statement and on page 1 of the proxy statement supplement, eight purported class action lawsuits were brought against ~~Lawson, the members of the Board, Parent, Merger Sub, Infor,~~ and ~~Golden Gate Capital, on behalf of~~ the ~~public~~number ~~stockholders~~ of ~~Lawson~~abstentions. Two of these purported class action lawsuits, which were both filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, were consolidated and certified as a class action, which we refer to as the Delaware action. On June 14, 2011, we entered into a memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the Delaware Memorandum of Understanding, with the plaintiffs in the Delaware action. Five purported class action lawsuits were filed in connection with the merger in the Second Judicial District Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota, and one purported class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Collectively, we refer to these actions as the Minnesota actions.

WeAdopt ~~expect to enter into~~ the ~~Minnesota~~Merger ~~Memorandum of Understanding with the plaintiffs regarding the settlement of the Minnesota actions on or about June 22, 2011.~~Agreement

The Company believes that no further disclosure is required to supplement the definitive proxy statement or the proxy statement supplement under applicable laws; however, to avoid the risk that the Minnesota actions may delay or otherwise adversely affect the consummation of the merger and to minimize the expense of defending such actions, the Company has agreed, pursuant to the terms of the proposed settlement, to make certain supplemental disclosures related to the proposed merger, all of which are set forth below. All terms, conditions and releases of the Delaware Memorandum of Understanding are expressly incorporated by reference and made part of the Minnesota Memorandum of Understanding. Plaintiffs in the Minnesota actions have agreed to dismiss the Minnesota actions with prejudice within two business days of final approval of the settlement of the Delaware action.

For		Against		Abstain
113,373,078		342,106		1,492,324

~~SUPPLEMENTAL~~Non-Binding ~~DISCLOSURES~~Approval of Certain Merger-Related Executive Compensation Arrangements

In connection with the settlement of the Minnesota actions as described in this supplemental disclosure, the Company has agreed to make these supplemental disclosures to the definitive proxy statement and the proxy statement supplement. These supplemental disclosures should be read in conjunction with the definitive proxy statement and the proxy statement supplement, which should be read in their entirety.

For		Against		Abstain
107,871,570		4,793,440		2,542,498

~~The~~A ~~Merger—Opinion~~copy of ~~Barclays~~the ~~Capital~~press ~~Inc~~release issued by the Company regarding the results of the stockholder vote at the special meeting of stockholders of the Company is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.

~~The~~Section 9 ~~following~~— ~~disclosure~~Financial ~~supplements~~Statements and ~~restates the sixth sentence of the second paragraph on page 42 of the definitive proxy statement under the heading “Selected Comparable Company Analysis”.~~Exhibits

2Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

Barclays Capital then applied these multiple ranges to the Company’s calendar year 2011 estimated revenue, estimated calendar year 2011 EBITDAS and estimated calendar year 2011 non-GAAP EPS, respectively, in each case based upon the Street Estimates, to calculate ranges of implied prices per share of the Company.(d) Exhibits

The following disclosure supplements and restates the first paragraph on page 45 of the definitive proxy statement under the heading “Selected Precedent Transaction Analysis”.

Exhibit		Description
99.1		Press Release of Lawson Software, Inc., dated June 29, 2011.

The reasons for and the circumstances surrounding each of the selected precedent transactions analyzed were diverse, and there are inherent differences in the business, operations, financial conditions and prospects of the Company and the companies included in the selected precedent transaction analysis. Accordingly, Barclays Capital believed that a purely quantitative selected precedent transaction analysis would not be particularly meaningful in the context of considering the merger. Barclays Capital therefore made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the characteristics of the selected precedent transactions and the merger which would affect the acquisition values of the selected target companies and the Company. Based upon these judgments, Barclays Capital selected a range of 1.80x to 2.70x EV/forward 12 month revenue multiples and applied this range to the Company’s estimated forward 12 month revenue and selected a range of 9.0x to 11.5x EV/forward 12 month EBITDAS multiples and applied this range to the Company’s estimated forward 12 month EBITDAS. For purposes of these analyses, the Company’s estimated forward 12 month revenue and forward 12 month EBITDAS were based upon the Street Estimates. These analyses resulted in a range of implied prices per share of common stock of $8.90 to $13.00 based on forward 12 month revenue and a range of implied prices per share of common stock of $9.80 to $12.30 based on forward 12 month EBITDAS.

The following disclosure supplements and restates the first paragraph under the heading “Leveraged Acquisition Analysis” on page 43 of the definitive proxy statement, as supplemented and restated by the information set forth in the last paragraph on page 4 of the proxy statement supplement.SIGNATURE

~~Barclays~~Pursuant ~~Capital~~to ~~performed a leveraged acquisition analysis based on~~ the ~~Street~~requirements ~~Estimates~~of ~~in order to ascertain a price for~~ the ~~common~~Securities ~~stock~~Exchange ~~which~~Act ~~might~~of be achieved in a stand-alone leveraged buyout transaction with a financial buyer given current financing market conditions. Based upon its experience and judgment and taking into account current market conditions1934, ~~Barclays Capital assumed~~ the ~~following~~Registrant inhas ~~its~~duly ~~analysis:~~caused ~~(1) total~~this ~~debt/FY2011E~~report ~~EBITDAS multiple of 6.5x (consisting of bank debt in an amount equal~~ to ~~4.5x FY2011E EBITDAS and senior notes in an amount equal to 2.0x FY2011E EBITDAS); (2) an equity investment that would~~ be ~~needed~~signed toon ~~achieve an internal rate of return of 20-25%; and (3) a forward exit multiple of 10.0x EBITDAS (exit at the end of fiscal year 2016). Based upon current market conditions at the time of~~ its ~~analysis,~~behalf ~~Barclays~~by ~~Capital assumed that~~ the ~~bank~~undersigned ~~debt~~hereunto ~~and~~duly ~~senior notes raised in connection with a hypothetical leveraged acquisition would bear interest at annual rates of 6% and 9%, respectively~~authorized.

Based upon these assumptions, Barclays Capital calculated a range of implied prices per share of the common stock of $9.40 to $10.20.

	Lawson Software, Inc.

Date: June 29, 2011	By:	/s/ Stefan Schulz
		Name:	Stefan Schulz
		Title:	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

~~SIGNATURE~~INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit		Description
99.1		Press Release of Lawson Software, Inc., dated June 29, 2011

	Lawson Software, Inc.
Date: June 22, 2011	By:	/s/ Stefan B. Schulz
		Name:	Stefan B. Schulz
		Title:	Senior Vice President and
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · Lawson Software, Inc.