UNITED STATES ~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 333-73012-04

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		52-2272489
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
601 Carlson Parkway
Minnetonka, Minnesota		55305
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

601 Carlson Parkway
Minnetonka, Minnesota		55305
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (952) 852-2431

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of ~~May~~July 1129, 2011, there were 505 outstanding shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share, of the ~~Registrant~~registrant.

The ~~Registrant~~registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H) (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with reduced disclosure format.

Table of Contents

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets: March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets: As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss): Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income: Three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	3
	Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder’s Equity: Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	4
	Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder’s Equity: Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2829
	Results of Operations — For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	29
	Results of Operations — For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	30
	Summary of Investment Results	35
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	44
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	39
	Critical Accounting Estimates	48
	Critical Accounting Estimates	43
	Forward-Looking Statements	49
	Forward-Looking Statements	44
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	50
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	45
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	50
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	45
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	4550
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	4550
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	4651
SIGNATURES		4752

Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31,		December 31,
	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	(Unaudited)
	(in millions, except share and per share amounts)
Assets
Investment securities:
Fixed maturity investments, at fair value (amortized cost $2,103.1 and $2,184.2)	$	2,155.6	$	2,240.4
Fixed maturity investments, at fair value (amortized cost $1,988.5 and $2,184.2)	$	2,042.9	$	2,240.4
Short-term investments, at amortized cost (which approximates fair value)	~~213~~97.72		166.8
Common equity securities, at fair value (cost $242.8 and $237.2)	296.5		285.3
Common equity securities, at fair value (cost $243.0 and $237.2)	291.6		285.3
Convertible bonds, at fair value (amortized cost $77.8 and $82.2)	87.0		93.8
Convertible bonds, at fair value (amortized cost $69.9 and $82.2)	75.2		93.8
Other investments	~~163~~158.03		171.4
Total investments	2,~~915~~665.82		2,957.7
Cash	3230.28		33.2
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses	1,~~864~~825.09		1,893.2
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses	1816.32		44.5
Premiums receivable	~~260~~276.59		275.0
Deferred acquisition costs	~~112~~119.02		114.5
Ceded unearned premiums	5826.42		113.9
Net deferred tax asset	~~137~~143.82		151.5
Investment income accrued	1614.35		18.0
Accounts receivable on unsettled investment sales	157.12		5.4
Other assets	~~274~~268.62		289.3
Total assets	$	5,~~705~~393.05	$	5,896.2
Liabilities
Loss and LAE reserves	$	3,~~224~~131.75	$	3,295.5
Unearned premiums	~~586~~570.50		627.5
Debt	~~419~~269.67		419.6
Ceded reinsurance payable	9051.40		149.3
Accounts payable on unsettled investment purchases	5122.30		14.1
Other liabilities	~~349~~355.75		409.8
Total liabilities	4,~~722~~399.27		4,915.8
OB Holdings’ common shareholder’s equity and noncontrolling interests
OB Holdings’ common shareholder’s equity:
Common shares and paid-in surplus (par value $1, issued and outstanding, 505 shares)	950.9		961.5
Retained earnings (deficit)	1123.86		(1.3		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, after tax:
Other comprehensive income and loss items	0.4		0.3
Total OB Holdings’ common shareholder’s equity	~~963~~974.19		960.5
Total noncontrolling interests	1918.79		19.9
Total OB Holdings’ common shareholder’s equity and noncontrolling interests	~~982~~993.8		980.4
Total liabilities, OB Holdings’ common shareholder’s equity and noncontrolling interests	$	5,~~705~~393.05	$	5,896.2

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ~~(LOSS)~~

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended						Six months ended
	2011			2010
	June 30,						June 30,
	($ in millions)
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Revenues
	($ in millions)
Earned premiums	$	263.5		$	453.2
Revenues
Net investment income	19.7			28.3
Earned premiums	$	265.0		$	428.3		$	528.5		$	881.5
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	21.9			42.4
Net investment income	17.8			25.0			37.5			53.3
Net other revenues (expenses)	0.8			(0.8		)
Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses)	9.9			(14.4		)	31.8			28.0
Total revenues	305.9			523.1
Net other expenses	(11.4		)	(10.0		)	(10.6		)	(10.8		)
Expenses
Total revenues	281.3			428.9			587.2			952.0
Loss and LAE	144.6			333.7
Expenses
Policy acquisition expenses	51.0			97.5
Loss and LAE	151.8			261.9			296.4			595.6
Other underwriting expenses	52.4			74.2
Policy acquisition expenses	55.4			91.3			106.4			188.8
General and administrative expenses	1.2			2.0
Other underwriting expenses	47.5			58.5			99.9			132.7
Interest expense on debt	6.3			9.1
General and administrative expenses	0.8			1.8			2.0			3.8
Total expenses	255.5			516.5
Interest expense on debt	6.2			7.9			12.5			17.0
Pre-tax income	50.4			6.6
Total expenses	261.7			421.4			517.2			937.9
Income tax expense	(17.5		)	(9.0		)
Pre-tax income	19.6			7.5			70.0			14.1
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	32.9			(2.4		)
Income tax expense	(7.3		)	(0.1		)	(24.8		)	(9.1		)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.4		)	(0.3		)
Net income including noncontrolling interests	12.3			7.4			45.2			5.0
Net income (loss) attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	32.5			(2.7		)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.5		)	(0.5		)	(0.9		)	(0.8		)
Change in other comprehensive income and loss items	0.1			0.2
Net income attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	11.8			6.9			44.3			4.2
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	$	32.6		$	(2.5	)
Change in other comprehensive income and loss items	—			—			0.1			0.2
Comprehensive income attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	$	11.8		$	6.9		$	44.4		$	4.4

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

(Unaudited)

	OB Holdings’ Common Shareholder’s Equity
	Common shareholder’s equity			Common shares and paid-in surplus			Retained (deficit) earnings			Accum. other comprehensive income, after tax		Noncontrolling interests, after tax
	($ in millions)
Balances at January 1, 2011	$	960.5		$	961.5		$	(1.3	)	$	0.3	$	19.9
Net income	3244.53			—			3244.53			—		0.49
Repurchases and retirements of common shares	—			—			—			—		0.3
Issuance of common shares	—			—			—			—		0.3
Repurchases and retirements of common shares	—			—			—			—		(1.3		)
Dividends to OneBeacon U.S. Enterprises Holdings, Inc.	(19.4		)	—			(19.4		)	—		—
Return of capital to OneBeacon U.S. Enterprises Holdings, Inc.	(10.6		)	(10.6		)	—			—		—
Dividends	—			—			—			—		(0.9		)
Other comprehensive income, after tax	0.1			—			—			0.1		—
Balances at March 31, 2011	$	963.1		$	950.9		$	11.8		$	0.4	$	19.7
Balances at June 30, 2011	$	974.9		$	950.9		$	23.6		$	0.4	$	18.9

	OB Holdings’ Common Shareholder’s Equity
	Common shareholder’s equity			Common shares and paid-in surplus		Retained earnings			Accum. other comprehensive (loss) income, after tax			Noncontrolling interests, after tax
	($ in millions)
Balances at January 1, 2010	$	1,391.5		$	970.5	$	427.2		$	(6.2	)	$	19.1
Net (loss) income	(2.7		)	—		(2.7		)	—			0.3
Net income	4.2			—		4.2			—			0.8
Repurchases and retirements of common shares	—			—		—			—			0.3
Issuance of common shares	—			—		—			—			0.3
Dividends to OneBeacon U.S. Enterprises Holdings, Inc.	(15.0		)	—		(15.0		)	—			—
Dividends	—			—		—			—			(0.7		)
Contributions	—			—		—			—			0.5
Distributions	—			—		—			—			(0.9		)
Other comprehensive income, after tax	0.2			—		—			0.2			—
Balances at March 31, 2010	$	1,374.0		$	970.5	$	409.5		$	(6.0	)	$	19.0
Balances at June 30, 2010	$	1,380.9		$	970.5	$	416.4		$	(6.0	)	$	19.1

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	$	32.9		$	(2.4	)
Net income including noncontrolling interests	$	45.2		$	5.0
Charges (credits) to reconcile net income (loss) to cash flows used for operations:
Charges (credits) to reconcile net income to cash flows used for operations:
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	(2131.98		)	(4228.40		)
Net other realized losses	—11.7			010.58
Deferred income tax expense	138.72			191.23
Other operating items:
Net change in loss and LAE reserves	(70164.80		)	56(76.59		)
Net change in unearned premiums	(4157.05		)	(1844.94		)
Net change in ceded reinsurance payable	(5898.93		)	64135.69
Net change in ceded unearned premiums	5587.57			(62121.6		)
Net change in premiums receivable	14(1.59		)	95.92
Net change in reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses	5595.46			~~(11~~65.86		)
Net change in other assets and liabilities	(3628.9		)	(6340.01		)
Net cash used for operations	(57134.50		)	(5087.42		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net maturities, purchases and sales of short-term investments	~~(46~~69.7		)	(~~509~~517.2		)
Maturities of fixed maturity investments	~~126~~243.36			~~683~~809.10
Sales of fixed maturity investments	~~356~~707.27			~~286~~512.31
Sales of common equity securities	1726.65			1137.31
Sales of convertible bonds	1628.61			2967.54
Distributions of other investments	18.2			2.1
Distributions and redemptions of other investments	26.6			0.6
Purchases of fixed maturity investments	(~~397~~739.28		)	(~~297~~481.72		)
Purchases of common equity securities	(1728.85		)	(6187.8		)
Purchases of convertible bonds	(810.68		)	(2327.7		)
Contributions for other investments	(3.51		)	(1232.56		)
Net change in unsettled investment purchases and sales	276.51			~~(14~~44.64		)
Net acquisitions of property and equipment	(2.19		)	(01.82		)
Net cash provided from investing activities	86323.52			92322.09
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of debt	—			(14.0		)
Repurchases of debt	—(161.6		)	(13197.13		)
Cash dividends paid to OneBeacon U.S. Enterprises Holdings, Inc.	(19.4		)	(15.0		)
Return of capital to OneBeacon U.S. Enterprises Holdings, Inc.	(10.6		)	—
Net cash used for financing activities	(30191.06		)	(42226.13		)
Net decrease in cash during period	(1.0		)	(0.5		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash during period	(2.4		)	9.4
Cash reclassified to assets held for sale	—			(9.1		)
Net (decrease) increase after reclassification of cash to assets held for sale	(2.4		)	0.3
Cash balance at beginning of period	33.2			43.6
Cash balance at end of period	$	3230.28		$	43.19
Supplemental cash flows information:
Interest paid	$	—10.8		$	018.41
Tax (refunds) payments, including payments made under tax sharing agreements	(4.2		)	27.9
Tax payments, including payments made under tax sharing agreements	10.9			36.3

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

These interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OneBeacon U.S. Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “OBH”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “OB Holdings”) and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The OB Holdings operating companies are U.S.-based property and casualty insurance writers, most of which operate in a multi-company pool. OB Holdings offers a wide range of specialty insurance products and services sold through independent agencies, regional and national brokers, wholesalers and managing general agencies.

OBH was created in 2000 by White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (“White Mountains”) to acquire and subsequently be the holding company for OneBeacon Insurance Group LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “OneBeacon”). On June 1, 2001, OBH acquired OneBeacon from Aviva plc (“Aviva”, formerly CGNU), (the “OneBeacon Acquisition”). During 2006, White Mountains undertook an internal reorganization and formed OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd. (“OBIG”) for the purpose of holding certain of its property and casualty insurance businesses. As part of this reorganization, certain of White Mountains’ businesses that were historically indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of White Mountains, including OBH, became indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of OBIG. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, White Mountains owned 7675.05% of OBIG’s common shares. Within this report, the term “OB Holdings” is used to refer to one or more entities within the consolidated organization, as the context requires. The Company is a U.S.-based company with its corporate headquarters located at 601 Carlson Parkway, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305.

OB Holdings’ reportable segments are Specialty Insurance Operations, Other Insurance Operations and Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations. The Specialty Insurance Operations segment is comprised of twelve underwriting units that are aggregated into three major underwriting units for financial reporting: Managing General Agency (“MGA”) Business, Specialty Industries and Specialty Products. OB Holdings’ Other Insurance Operations segment includes AutoOne Insurance (“AutoOne”), a division that offers products and services to assigned risk markets. Other Insurance Operations also includes the results of the non-specialty commercial lines business and the traditional personal lines business, other run-off business and certain purchase accounting adjustments relating to the OneBeacon Acquisition. Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations includes the investing and financing activities for OB Holdings on a consolidated basis, and certain other activities conducted by the Company.

Historically, OB Holdings has offered a range of specialty, commercial and personal products and services, however, in the wake of recent transactions OB Holdings is now focused exclusively on specialty business. On December 3, 2009, OB Holdings sold the renewal rights to its non-specialty commercial lines business and on July 1, 2010, OB Holdings completed the sale of its traditional personal lines business (Note 2). To better align OB Holdings’ operating and reporting structure with its business profile as a result of the transactions, OB Holdings revised its segment structure into Specialty Insurance Operations, Other Insurance Operations and Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations, as described above. As part of the resegmentation, agency results for business written on OB Holdings paper for which OB Holdings has an ownership interest have been reclassified within the underwriting results. The prior ~~period~~periods ~~has~~have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. See Note 7.

All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary by management to fairly ~~present~~state the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of OB Holdings. These interim financial statements may not be indicative of financial results for the full year and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Refer to the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion regarding OB Holdings’ significant accounting policies. Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Policy Acquisition Costs

On October 13, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts, codified within Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 944. The new standard changes the types of policy acquisition costs that are eligible for deferral. Specifically, the new guidance limits deferrable costs to those that are incremental direct costs of contract acquisition and certain costs related to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection costs and sales force

Table of Contents

~~contract~~Recently ~~selling.~~Issued ~~ASU~~Accounting 2010-26 defines incremental direct costs as those costs that result directly from and were essential to the contract acquisition and would not have been incurred absent the acquisition. Accordingly, under the new guidance, deferrable acquisition costs are limited to costs related to successful contract acquisitions. Acquisition costs that are not eligible for deferral are to be charged to expense in the period incurred.Pronouncements

~~ASU~~Policy ~~2010-26~~Acquisition is effective for interim periods and annual fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. OB Holdings is in the process of determining the expected effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows upon adoption.Costs

On October 13, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts, codified within Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 944. The new standard changes the types of policy acquisition costs that are eligible for deferral. Specifically, the new guidance limits deferrable costs to those that are incremental direct costs of contract acquisition and certain costs related to acquisition activities performed by the insurer, such as underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection costs and sales force contract selling. ASU 2010-26 defines incremental direct costs as those costs that result directly from and were essential to the contract acquisition and would not have been incurred absent the acquisition. Accordingly, under the new guidance, deferrable acquisition costs are limited to costs related to successful contract acquisitions. Acquisition costs that are not eligible for deferral are to be charged to expense in the period incurred.

ASU 2010-26 is effective for interim periods and annual fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. OB Holdings is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2010-26 will have on its financial position and results of operations.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

On May 12, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 clarifies existing guidance with respect to the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise and measuring instruments classified within a reporting entity’s shareholders’ equity. ASU 2011-04 also clarifies disclosure requirements, requiring disclosure of quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 also amends existing guidance. In circumstances where a reporting entity manages a portfolio of financial assets and liabilities based on the net market and counterparty credit risk exposures, ASU 2011-04 permits determination of the fair value of those instruments to be based on the net risk exposure. In addition, ASU 2011-04 permits the application of premiums or discounts to be applied in a fair value measurement to the extent that market participants would consider them in valuing the financial instruments. ASU 2011-04 also expands the required disclosures for Level 3 measurements, requiring that reporting entities provide a narrative description of the sensitivity of Level 3 fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those inputs, if any. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. OB Holdings is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have on its financial position and results of operations.

NOTE 2. Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2011, ~~and~~there were no acquisitions or dispositions. Except as described below with respect to the Personal Lines Transaction, during the first six months of 2010, there were no acquisitions or dispositions.

On July 1, 2010, OBIG and certain of its subsidiaries completed the sale of its traditional personal lines business (the “Personal Lines Transaction”) to Tower Group, Inc. (“Tower”) ~~for consideration of $166~~.6 ~~million.~~ The Personal Lines Transaction included two insurance companies, York Insurance Company of Maine (“York”) and Massachusetts Homeland Insurance Company (“MHIC”), through which the majority of the traditional personal lines business was written on a direct basis, two attorneys-in-fact managing the reciprocal insurance exchanges (“reciprocals”) that wrote the traditional personal lines business in New York and New Jersey, the surplus notes issued by the New York and New Jersey reciprocals and the remaining renewal rights to certain other traditional personal lines insurance policies. In addition, the Personal Lines Transaction included the execution of reinsurance agreements with certain subsidiaries of the Company pursuant to which OneBeacon cedes, on a 100% quota share basis, traditional personal lines business not directly written by York and MHIC and assumes, on a 100% quota share basis, non-traditional personal lines business written directly by York. During the second quarter of 2011, OneBeacon and Tower reached agreement on post-closing adjustments resulting in no material change to the $24.6 million after tax net gain on sale that OB Holdings had recorded during 2010. OB Holdings’ financial statements for the second quarter of 2010 included a $5.6 million tax benefit, a component of the net gain recorded upon completion of the sale, related to the difference between the tax basis of the companies sold as part of the Personal Lines Transaction and the net asset value of those entities under GAAP.

OneBeacon and Tower also entered into a Transition Services Agreement (“TSA”), pursuant to which OneBeacon is providing certain services to Tower during the three-year term of the TSA. Tower reimburses OneBeacon for all expenses incurred to provide these services. Reimbursement for these services is netted against the expense incurred. The Personal Lines Transaction did not meet the criteria for discontinued operations accounting because of significant continuing cash flows between OneBeacon and the business sold relating to TSA services and reinsurance activities.

Table of Contents

NOTE 3. Reserves for Unpaid Loss and LAE

The following table summarizes the loss and LAE reserve activities of OB Holdings’ insurance subsidiaries for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010:

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Gross beginning balance	$	3,~~295~~224.57		$	3,~~934~~991.83		$	3,295.5		$	3,934.8
Less beginning reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses	(1,~~893~~864.20		)	(2,~~192~~200.98		)	(1,893.2		)	(2,192.9		)
Net loss and LAE reserves	1,~~402~~360.37			1,~~741~~790.95			1,402.3			1,741.9
Loss and LAE incurred relating to:
Current year losses	~~149~~161.79			~~339~~280.72			311.6			619.9
Prior year losses	(510.1		)	(618.03		)	(15.2		)	(24.3		)
Total incurred loss and LAE	~~144~~151.68			~~333~~261.79			296.4			595.6
Loss and LAE paid relating to:
Current year losses	(2861.12		)	(73132.09		)	(89.3		)	(205.9		)
Prior year losses	(~~158~~145.17		)	(~~212~~180.10		)	(303.8		)	(392.1		)
Total loss and LAE payments	(~~186~~206.29		)	(~~285~~312.19		)	(393.1		)	(598.0		)
Net ending balance	1,360.7			1,790.5
Net loss and LAE reserves	1,305.6			1,739.5			1,305.6			1,739.5
Plus ending reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses	1,864.0			2,200.8
Net loss and LAE reserves reclassified to held for sale	—			(231.0		)	—			(231.0		)
Gross ending balance	$	3,224.7		$	3,991.3
Net ending balance	1,305.6			1,508.5			1,305.6			1,508.5
Plus ending reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses	1,825.9			2,100.7			1,825.9			2,100.7
Gross ending balance	$	3,131.5		$	3,609.2		$	3,131.5		$	3,609.2

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, OB Holdings experienced $510.1 million of favorable loss and LAE reserve development on prior accident year loss reserves, with $17.21 million in Specialty Insurance Operations and $3.90 million in Other Insurance Operations. The favorable loss reserve development was primarily due to lower than expected severity on non-catastrophe losses related to professional liability lines, multiple peril liability lines and other general liability lines. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, OB Holdings experienced $618.03 million of favorable loss and LAE reserve development on prior accident year loss reserves, with $28.73 million in Specialty Insurance Operations and $310.30 million in Other Insurance Operations. The favorable loss reserve development was primarily due to lower than expected severity on non-catastrophe losses related to professional liability lines, multiple peril liability lines and other general liability lines. The favorable development also included a one-time $6.5 million release of commercial and personal auto reserves associated with participation in an involuntary auto pool.

InDuring ~~connection~~the ~~with~~six ~~purchase~~months ~~accounting~~ended ~~for~~June 30, ~~the OneBeacon Acquisition~~2011, OB Holdings experienced $15.2 million of favorable loss and LAE reserve development on prior accident year loss reserves, with $8.3 million in Specialty Insurance Operations and $6.9 million in Other Insurance Operations. The favorable loss reserve development was ~~required~~primarily due to ~~adjust~~lower than expected severity on non-catastrophe losses related to ~~fair~~professional ~~value~~liability lines, multiple peril liability lines and other general liability lines. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, OB Holdings experienced $24.3 million of favorable loss and LAE reserve development on prior accident year loss reserves, ~~and~~with ~~the~~$11.0 ~~related~~million ~~reinsurance~~in ~~recoverables~~Specialty onInsurance ~~the~~Operations ~~balance~~and ~~sheet~~$13.3 million Other Insurance Operations. The ~~net~~favorable ~~reduction~~loss reserve development was primarily due to ~~loss~~lower ~~and~~than ~~LAE~~expected ~~reserves~~severity ~~was~~on ~~accreted~~non-catastrophe ~~through~~losses anrelated ~~income~~to ~~statement~~professional ~~charge~~liability ~~ratably~~lines, ~~with~~multiple peril liability lines and ~~over~~other ~~the~~general ~~period~~liability ~~the~~lines. ~~claims~~The ~~were~~favorable ~~settled~~development also included a one-time $6.5 Asmillion release of ~~both~~commercial ~~March 31,~~and ~~2011~~personal ~~and~~auto ~~December 31,~~reserves ~~2010,~~associated ~~the~~with ~~outstanding~~participation ~~pre-tax~~in ~~unaccreted~~an ~~adjustment~~involuntary ~~was~~auto $0pool.

~~NOTE~~In 4connection with purchase accounting for the OneBeacon Acquisition, OB Holdings was required to adjust to fair value the loss and LAE reserves and the related reinsurance recoverables on the balance sheet. ~~Reinsurance~~The net reduction to loss and LAE reserves was accreted through an income statement charge ratably with and over the period the claims were settled. As of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding pre-tax unaccreted adjustment was $0.

In the normal course of business, OB Holdings’ insurance subsidiaries seek to limit losses that may arise from catastrophes or other events by reinsuring with third party reinsurers. OB Holdings remains liable for risks reinsured even if the reinsurer does not honor its obligations under reinsurance contracts.

Effective July 1, 2010, OB Holdings renewed its property catastrophe reinsurance program through June 30, 2011. The program provides coverage for OB Holdings’ property business as well as certain acts of terrorism. Under the program, the first $80.0 million of losses resulting from any single catastrophe are retained and the next $195.0 million of losses resulting from the catastrophe are reinsured, although OB Holdings retains a co-participation (20% of losses in excess of $80.0 million up to $100.0 million and 8% of losses in excess of $100.0 million up to $140.0 million). Any loss above $275.0 million would be retained in full. In the event of a catastrophe, OB Holdings’ property catastrophe reinsurance program is reinstated for the remainder of the original contract term by paying a reinstatement premium that is based on the percentage of coverage reinstated and the original property catastrophe coverage premium.

The contract term has subsequently been reduced to conclude on April 30, 2011. New coverage is in place effective May 1, 2011, the same effective date as the property per risk reinsurance treaty. Under the program, the first $50.0 million of losses resulting from any single catastrophe are retained and the next $175.0 million of losses resulting from the catastrophe are reinsured in three layers, although OB Holdings retains a co-participation (26% of losses in excess of $50.0 million up to $100.0 million and 10% of losses in excess of $100.0 million up to $175.0 million). Any loss above $225.0 million would be retained in full. In the event of a catastrophe, OB Holdings’ property catastrophe reinsurance program is reinstated for the remainder of the original contract term by

Table of Contents

~~paying~~NOTE ~~a reinstatement premium that is based on the percentage of coverage reinstated and the original property catastrophe coverage premium~~4. Reinsurance

OBIn ~~Holdings~~the ~~had~~normal ~~entered~~course ~~into a 30% quota share agreement with a group~~ of ~~reinsurers that ran from January 1~~business, ~~2009 through December 31, 2009, and had renewed the agreement effective January 1, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010,~~ OB Holdings’ ~~ceded~~insurance ~~$11.6~~subsidiaries ~~million~~seek ofto ~~written~~limit ~~premiums~~losses ~~from~~that ~~its~~may ~~Northeast~~arise ~~homeowners~~from ~~business~~catastrophes ~~written~~or ~~through~~other ~~OneBeacon~~events ~~Insurance~~by ~~Company~~reinsuring ~~(“OBIC”) and its subsidiary companies, along~~ with ~~Adirondack~~third ~~Insurance~~party ~~Exchange (“Adirondack Insurance”) and New Jersey Skylands Insurance Agency (“NJSIA”) in New York and New Jersey, respectively~~reinsurers. ~~Effective~~OB ~~July 1,~~Holdings ~~2010,~~remains ~~the~~liable ~~closing~~for ~~date~~risks ofreinsured ~~the~~even ~~Personal~~if ~~Lines Transaction,~~ the ~~agreement~~reinsurer ~~was~~does ~~amended~~not tohonor ~~remove~~its ~~OneBeacon~~obligations asunder areinsurance ~~signatory~~contracts.

AtEffective ~~March~~May 311, 2011, OB Holdings ~~had~~renewed ~~$18.3 million~~its ofproperty catastrophe reinsurance ~~recoverables~~program onthrough ~~paid~~April 30, ~~losses~~2012. ~~and~~The ~~$2,037.2 million~~program ~~(gross~~provides coverage for OB Holdings’ property business as well as certain acts of terrorism. Under the program, the first $~~173~~50.2 0 million inof ~~purchase~~losses ~~accounting~~resulting ~~adjustments,~~from asany ~~described~~single incatastrophe ~~Note 3)~~are ~~that~~retained ~~will~~and ~~become~~the ~~recoverable~~next if$175.0 ~~claims~~million of losses resulting from the catastrophe are ~~paid~~reinsured in ~~accordance~~three ~~with~~layers, ~~current~~although ~~reserve~~OB ~~estimates.~~Holdings ~~Reinsurance~~retains ~~contracts~~a doco-participation ~~not~~(26% ~~relieve~~of OBlosses ~~Holdings~~in excess of ~~its~~$50.0 ~~obligations~~million up to $100.0 ~~Therefore,~~million ~~collectibility~~and 10% of ~~balances~~losses ~~due~~in ~~from~~excess ~~its~~of ~~reinsurers~~$100.0 ismillion ~~critical~~up to OB$175.0 ~~Holdings’~~million). ~~financial~~Any ~~strength~~loss above $225.0 OBmillion ~~Holdings~~would isbe ~~selective~~retained in ~~regard~~full. toIn ~~its~~the ~~reinsurers,~~event ~~principally~~of ~~placing~~a ~~reinsurance~~catastrophe, ~~with~~OB ~~those~~Holdings’ ~~reinsurers~~property ~~with~~catastrophe ~~strong~~reinsurance ~~financial~~program ~~condition,~~is ~~industry~~reinstated ~~ratings~~for ~~and~~the ~~underwriting~~remainder ~~ability.~~of ~~Management~~the ~~monitors~~original ~~the~~contract ~~financial~~term ~~condition~~by ~~and~~paying ~~ratings~~a ofreinstatement ~~its~~premium ~~reinsurers~~that onis anbased ~~ongoing~~on ~~basis.~~the Aspercentage aof ~~result,~~coverage ~~uncollectible~~reinstated ~~amounts~~and ~~have~~the ~~historically~~original ~~not~~property ~~been~~catastrophe ~~significant~~coverage premium.

OB Holdings had entered into a 30% quota share agreement with a group of reinsurers that ran from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, and had renewed the agreement effective January 1, 2010. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, OB Holdings ceded $14.0 million and $25.6 million, respectively, of written premiums from its Northeast homeowners business written through OneBeacon Insurance Company (“OBIC”) and its subsidiary companies, along with Adirondack Insurance Exchange (“Adirondack Insurance”) and New Jersey Skylands Insurance Agency (“NJSIA”) in New York and New Jersey, respectively. Effective July 1, 2010, the closing date of the Personal Lines Transaction, the agreement was amended to remove OB Holdings as a signatory.

At June 30, 2011, OB Holdings had $16.2 million of reinsurance recoverables on paid losses and $1,995.8 million (gross of $169.9 million in purchase accounting adjustments, as described in Note 3) that will become recoverable if claims are paid in accordance with current reserve estimates. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve OB Holdings of its obligations. Therefore, collectibility of balances due from its reinsurers is critical to OB Holdings’ financial strength. OB Holdings is selective in regard to its reinsurers, principally placing reinsurance with those reinsurers with strong financial condition, industry ratings and underwriting ability. Management monitors the financial condition and ratings of its reinsurers on an ongoing basis. As a result, uncollectible amounts have historically not been significant.

The following table provides a listing of OB Holdings’ top reinsurers for its insurance operations, excluding industry pools and associations and affiliates of OB Holdings, based upon recoverable amounts, the percentage of total reinsurance recoverables and the reinsurers’ A.M. Best Company, Inc. (“A.M. Best”) ratings.

($ in millions)	Balance at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011		% of total		A.M. Best Rating(1)
National Indemnity Company and General Reinsurance Corporation(2)	$	1,~~524~~491.74	74	%	A++	++
Hanover Insurance Company	~~108~~113.96		56	%	A
Tower Insurance Company	74.0		4	%	A-
Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire(3)	64.2		3	%	A	++
Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire(3)	67.5		3	%	A++
Tower Insurance Company	62.3		3	%	A	-
Munich Reinsurance America	3332.45		2	%	A+	+

(1) A.M. Best ratings as detailed above are: “A++” (Superior, which is the highest of fifteen financial strength ratings), “A+” (Superior, which is the second highest of fifteen financial strength ratings), “A” (Excellent, which is the third highest of fifteen financial strength ratings) and “A-” (Excellent, which is the fourth highest of fifteen financial strength ratings).

(2) Includes $~~320~~193.25 million of Third-Party Recoverables (as defined below), which NICO (as defined below) would pay under the terms of the NICO Cover (as defined below) if they are unable to collect from third-party reinsurers.

(3) Includes $4037.31 million of reinsurance recoverables from various reinsurers that are guaranteed by Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire under the terms of a 100% quota share reinsurance agreement between Houston General Insurance Company and Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire.

In connection with the OneBeacon Acquisition, Aviva caused OneBeacon to purchase two reinsurance contracts: a reinsurance contract with National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), for up to $2.5 billion in old asbestos and environmental (“A&E”) claims and certain other exposures (the “NICO Cover”) and an adverse loss reserve development cover from General Reinsurance Corporation (“GRC”) for up to $570.0 million, comprised of $400.0 million of adverse loss reserve development occurring in years 2000 and prior (the “GRC Cover”) in addition to $170.0 million of reserves ceded as of the date of the OneBeacon Acquisition. The NICO Cover and GRC Cover, which were contingent on and occurred contemporaneously with the OneBeacon Acquisition, were put in place in lieu of a seller guarantee of loss and LAE reserves and are therefore accounted for under GAAP as a seller guarantee.

Under the terms of the NICO Cover, NICO receives the economic benefit of reinsurance recoverables from certain of OB Holdings’ third party reinsurers (“Third Party Reinsurers”) in existence at the time the NICO Cover was executed (“Third Party Recoverables”). As a result, the Third Party Recoverables serve to protect the $2.5 billion limit of NICO coverage for the benefit of OB Holdings. OB Holdings estimates that on an incurred basis it has used approximately $2.2 billion of the coverage provided by NICO at March 31, 2011. Since entering into the NICO Cover, approximately 8% of the $2.2 billion of utilized coverage relates to uncollectible Third Party Recoverables and settlements on Third Party Recoverables through March 31, 2011. Net losses paid totaled approximately $1.3 billion as of March 31, 2011. To the extent that actual experience differs from OB Holdings’ estimate of ultimate A&E losses and Third Party Recoverables, future losses could exceed the $320.2 million of protection remaining under the NICO Cover at March 31, 2011.

Table of Contents

~~Pursuant~~NICO toCover ~~the~~and GRC Cover, OBwhich ~~Holdings~~were iscontingent ~~not~~on ~~entitled~~and tooccurred ~~recover~~contemporaneously ~~losses~~with to the ~~full~~OneBeacon ~~contract~~Acquisition, ~~limit~~were ifput ~~such~~in ~~losses~~place ~~are reimbursed by GRC more quickly than anticipated at the time the contract was signed. OB Holdings intends to seek reimbursement from GRC only for claims which result~~ in ~~payment~~lieu ~~patterns~~of ~~similar~~a toseller ~~those~~guarantee ~~supporting its recoverables recorded pursuant to the GRC Cover. The economic cost~~ of ~~not~~loss ~~submitting~~and ~~certain~~LAE ~~other~~reserves ~~eligible claims to GRC is primarily the investment spread between the rate credited by GRC~~ and ~~the~~are ~~rate~~therefore ~~achieved~~accounted byfor OBunder ~~Holdings~~GAAP onas ~~its~~a ~~own~~seller ~~investments~~guarantee. ~~This cost, if any, is expected to be nominal. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, $33.8 million was collected under the GRC Cover.~~

Under the terms of the NICO Cover, NICO receives the economic benefit of reinsurance recoverables from certain of OB Holdings’ third party reinsurers (“Third Party Reinsurers”) in existence at the time the NICO Cover was executed (“Third Party Recoverables”). As a result, the Third Party Recoverables serve to protect the $2.5 billion limit of NICO coverage for the benefit of OB Holdings. OB Holdings estimates that on an incurred basis it has used approximately $2.2 billion of the coverage provided by NICO at June 30, 2010. Since entering into the NICO Cover, approximately 8% of the $2.2 billion of utilized coverage relates to uncollectible Third Party Recoverables and settlements on Third Party Recoverables through June 30, 2011. Net losses paid totaled approximately $1.3 billion as of June 30, 2011. To the extent that actual experience differs from OB Holdings’ estimate of ultimate A&E losses and Third Party Recoverables, future losses could exceed the $320.2 million of protection remaining under the NICO Cover.

Pursuant to the GRC Cover, OB Holdings is not entitled to recover losses to the full contract limit if such losses are reimbursed by GRC more quickly than anticipated at the time the contract was signed. OB Holdings intends to seek reimbursement from GRC only for claims which result in payment patterns similar to those supporting its recoverables recorded pursuant to the GRC Cover. The economic cost of not submitting certain other eligible claims to GRC is primarily the investment spread between the rate credited by GRC and the rate achieved by OB Holdings on its own investments. This cost, if any, is expected to be nominal. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, $13.3 million and $47.1 million, respectively, was collected under the GRC Cover.

NOTE 5. Investment Securities

OB Holdings’ invested assets are comprised of securities and other investments held for general investment purposes. Refer to the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion.

In accordance with ASC 825, OB Holdings classifies its portfolio of fixed maturity investments and common equity securities, including convertible bonds, held for general investment purposes as trading securities. Trading securities are reported at fair value as of the balance sheet date as determined by quoted market prices when available. Realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on trading securities are reported in net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses in revenues on a pre-tax basis.

Short-term investments consist of money market funds, certificates of deposit and other securities which, at the time of purchase, mature or become available for use within one year. Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximated fair value as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Other investments primarily include hedge funds and private equity funds. OB Holdings measures its investments in hedge funds and private equity funds at fair value with changes therein reported in net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses in revenues on a pre-tax basis. Other investments also includes an investment in a community reinvestment vehicle which is accounted for at fair value and a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund which OB Holdings accounts for under the equity method.

OB Holdings’ net investment income is comprised primarily of interest income associated with OB Holdings’ fixed maturity investments, dividend income from its equity investments and interest income from its short-term investments. Net investment income for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Investment income:
Fixed maturity investments	$	1918.1		$	2724.73		$	37.2		$	52.0
Short-term investments	—0.1			0.14			0.1			0.5
Common equity securities	1.30			01.81			2.3			1.9
Convertible bonds	1.0.7			1.64			1.7			3.0
Other investments	—(0.4		)	0.42			(0.4		)	0.6
Gross investment income	2119.45			3027.64			40.9			58.0
Less investment expenses	(1.7		)	(2.34		)	(3.4		)	(4.7		)
Net investment income, pre-tax	$	1917.78		$	2825.30		$	37.5		$	53.3

The composition of net realized investment gains (losses), a component of net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses), consisted of the following:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2011		2010
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments	$	10.6	$	24.4
Short-term investments	—		—
Common equity securities	2.5		0.3
Convertible bonds	3.3		4.1
Other investments	4.8		(2.4		)
Net realized investment gains, pre-tax	$	21.2	$	26.4

Table of Contents

The ~~net~~composition ~~changes~~of innet ~~fair~~realized ~~value~~investment ~~for~~gains ~~the~~(losses), ~~three~~a ~~months~~component ~~ended~~of ~~March 31,~~net ~~2011~~realized and ~~2010~~unrealized ~~are~~investment asgains ~~follows~~(losses), consisted of the following:

	Three months ended March 31, 2011
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	Changes in net unrealized gains and losses (1)			Changes in net foreign currency translation gains and losses (1)			Total net changes in fair value reflected in revenues (1)
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments	$	(311.93	)	$	05.16		$	(321.89	)	$	30.0
Short-term investments	—			—			—			—
Common equity securities	51.73			—1.3			53.78			1.6
Convertible bonds	(21.81		)	—6.4			(24.84		)	10.5
Other investments	1.6			—			1.6
Other investments (1)	2.8			(0.5		)	7.6			(2.9		)
Total	$	0.6		$	0.1		$	0.7
Net realized investment gains (losses), pre-tax	$	16.5		$	12.8		$	37.7		$	39.2

	Three months ended March 31, 2010
	Changes in net unrealized gains and losses (1)			Changes in net foreign currency translation gains and losses (1)			Total net changes in fair value reflected in revenues (1)(2)
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments	$	(1.8	)	$	2.6		$	0.8
Short-term investments	—			(0.3		)	(0.3		)
Common equity securities	7.2			—			7.2
Convertible bonds	2.1			—			2.1
Other investments	6.2			—			6.2
Total	$	13.7		$	2.3		$	16.0

(1) The three and six months ended June 30, 2010 include $1.3 million of realized losses related to the impairment of a receivable related to an outstanding hedge fund redemption.

~~(1) Includes~~The net changes in ~~net~~fair ~~deferred~~value ~~gains and losses on sales of investments between OB Holdings and entities under White Mountains’ common control of $(0.4) million and $(0.9) million, pre-tax,~~ for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~and~~are ~~2010,~~as ~~respectively.~~follows:

The components of OB Holdings’ ending net unrealized investment gains and losses, excluding the impact of net unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses, on its investment portfolio as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Three months ended June 30, 2011									Six months ended June 30, 2011
	Changes in net unrealized gains and losses(1)			Changes in net foreign currency translation gains and losses(1)			Total net changes in fair value reflected in revenues(1)			Changes in net unrealized gains and losses(1)			Changes in net foreign currency translation gains and losses(1)			Total net changes in fair value reflected in revenues(1)
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments	$	1.0		$	—		$	1.0		$	(2.9	)	$	0.1		$	(2.8	)
Short-term investments	—			0.1			0.1			—			0.1			0.1
Common equity securities	(5.1		)	(0.1		)	(5.2		)	0.6			(0.1		)	0.5
Convertible bonds	(3.8		)	—			(3.8		)	(6.6		)	—			(6.6		)
Other investments	1.3			—			1.3			2.9			—			2.9
Total	$	(6.6	)	$	—		$	(6.6	)	$	(6.0	)	$	0.1		$	(5.9	)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Investment securities:
Gross unrealized investment gains	$	160.7		$	161.0
Gross unrealized investment losses	(16.5		)	(17.8		)
Net unrealized gains from investment securities	144.2			143.2
Income taxes	(50.5		)	(50.1		)
Total net unrealized investment gains, after tax	$	93.7		$	93.1

(1) Includes changes in net deferred gains and losses on sales of investments between OB Holdings and entities under White Mountains’ common control of $(0.9) million and $(1.3) million, pre-tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

The ~~cost~~net orchanges ~~amortized~~in ~~cost,~~fair ~~gross~~value ~~unrealized~~for ~~investment~~the ~~gains~~three and ~~losses,~~six ~~net~~months ~~foreign~~ended ~~currency gains and carrying values of OB Holdings’ fixed maturity investments as of March~~June 3130, ~~2011 and December 31,~~ 2010 ~~were~~are as follows:

	March 31, 2011
	Three months ended June 30, 2010									Six months ended June 30, 2010
	Cost or amortized cost			Gross unrealized gains			Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains			Carrying value
	Changes in net unrealized gains and losses(1)			Changes in net foreign currency translation gains and losses(1)			Total net changes in fair value reflected in revenues(1)			Changes in net unrealized gains and losses(1)			Changes in net foreign currency translation gains and losses(1)			Total net changes in fair value reflected in revenues(1)
	($ in millions)
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	250.2		$	5.3		$	(0.3	)	$	—		$	255.2
Fixed maturity investments	$	0.9		$	(2.7	)	$	(1.8	)	$	(0.9	)	$	(0.1	)	$	(1.0	)
Debt securities issued by industrial corporations	802.2			40.5			(5.2		)	—			837.5
Short-term investments	—			(0.6		)	(0.6		)	—			(0.9		)	(0.9		)
Municipal obligations	2.1			—			(0.1		)	—			2.0
Common equity securities	(11.8		)	—			(11.8		)	(4.6		)	—			(4.6		)
Asset-backed securities	964.0			7.7			(4.9		)	—			966.8
Convertible bonds	(10.5		)	—			(10.5		)	(8.4		)	—			(8.4		)
Foreign government obligations	7.7			0.5			—			0.1			8.3
Other investments	(2.5		)	—			(2.5		)	3.7			—			3.7
Preferred stocks	76.9			8.9			—			—			85.8
Total	$	(23.9	)	$	(3.3	)	$	(27.2	)	$	(10.2	)	$	(1.0	)	$	(11.2	)
Total fixed maturity investments	$	2,103.1		$	62.9		$	(10.5	)	$	0.1		$	2,155.6

(1) Includes changes in net deferred gains and losses on sales of investments between OB Holdings and entities under White Mountains’ common control of $(0.4) million and $(1.3) million, pre-tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.

Table of Contents

	December 31, 2010
	Cost or amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains		Carrying value
	($ in millions)
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	241.7	$	9.0	$	—		$	—	$	250.7
Debt securities issued by industrial corporations	825.6		44.7		(5.4		)	—		864.9
Municipal obligations	2.1		—		—			—		2.1
Asset-backed securities	1,027.6		9.1		(7.7		)	—		1,029.0
Foreign government obligations	9.7		0.6		—			—		10.3
Preferred stocks	77.5		5.9		—			—		83.4
Total fixed maturity investments	$	2,184.2	$	69.3	$	(13.1	)	$	—	$	2,240.4

The components of OB Holdings’ ending net unrealized investment gains and losses, excluding the impact of net unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses, on its investment portfolio as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized investment gains and losses, net foreign currency gains and carrying values of OB Holdings’ common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Investment securities:
Gross unrealized investment gains	$	148.1		$	161.0
Gross unrealized investment losses	(9.6		)	(17.8		)
Net unrealized gains from investment securities	138.5			143.2
Income taxes	(48.5		)	(50.1		)
Total net unrealized investment gains, after tax	$	90.0		$	93.1

	March 31, 2011
	Cost or amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains		Carrying value
	($ in millions)
Common equity securities	$	242.8	$	56.2	$	(2.6	)	$	0.1	$	296.5
Convertible bonds	77.8		9.3		(0.1		)	—		87.0
Other investments	134.0		32.3		(3.3		)	—		163.0

The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized investment gains and losses, net foreign currency gains and carrying values of OB Holdings’ fixed maturity investments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	June 30, 2011
	Cost or amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains		Carrying value
	($ in millions)
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	219.9	$	2.2	$	—		$	—	$	222.1
Debt securities issued by corporations	713.3		38.1		(1.8		)	—		749.6
Municipal obligations	2.0		—		—			—		2.0
Asset-backed securities	968.7		10.6		(1.5		)	—		977.8
Foreign government obligations	7.7		0.6		—			0.1		8.4
Preferred stocks	76.9		6.1		—			—		83.0
Total fixed maturity investments	$	1,988.5	$	57.6	$	(3.3	)	$	0.1	$	2,042.9

	December 31, 2010
	Cost or amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains		Carrying value
	($ in millions)
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	241.7	$	9.0	$	—		$	—	$	250.7
Debt securities issued by corporations	825.6		44.7		(5.4		)	—		864.9
Municipal obligations	2.1		—		—			—		2.1
Asset-backed securities	1,027.6		9.1		(7.7		)	—		1,029.0
Foreign government obligations	9.7		0.6		—			—		10.3
Preferred stocks	77.5		5.9		—			—		83.4
Total fixed maturity investments	$	2,184.2	$	69.3	$	(13.1	)	$	—	$	2,240.4

The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized investment gains and losses, net foreign currency gains and carrying values of OB Holdings’ common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	June 30, 2011
	Cost or amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains		Carrying value
	($ in millions)
Common equity securities	$	243.0	$	50.8	$	(2.2	)	$	—	$	291.6
Convertible bonds	69.9		6.3		(1.0		)	—		75.2
Other investments	128.0		33.4		(3.1		)	—		158.3

Table of Contents

	December 31, 2010
	Cost or amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Net foreign currency gains		Carrying value
	($ in millions)
Common equity securities	$	237.2	$	48.4	$	(0.4	)	$	0.1	$	285.3
Convertible bonds	82.2		11.6		—			—		93.8
Other investments	144.0		31.7		(4.3		)	—		171.4

Fair value measurements

OB Holdings records its investments in accordance with ASC 820 which provides a revised definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands financial statement disclosure requirements for fair value information. Under ASC 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an “exit price”). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between inputs based on market data from independent sources (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s internal assumptions based upon the best information available when external market data is limited or unavailable (“unobservable inputs”). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities have the highest priority (“Level 1”), followed by observable inputs other than quoted prices, including quoted prices for similar, but not identical assets or liabilities (“Level 2”) and unobservable inputs, including the reporting entity’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use, having the lowest priority (“Level 3”).

As of ~~March~~both June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately ~~91% and~~ 90%, ~~respectively,~~ of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value was priced based upon observable inputs.

OB Holdings uses brokers and outside pricing services to assist in determining fair values. For investments in active markets, OB Holdings uses the quoted market prices provided by the outside pricing services to determine fair value. The outside pricing services OB Holdings uses have indicated that they will only provide prices where observable inputs are available. In circumstances where quoted market prices are unavailable, OB Holdings utilizes fair value estimates based upon reference to other observable inputs other than quoted prices, including matrix pricing, benchmark interest rates, market comparables, broker quotes and other relevant observable inputs. In circumstances where observable inputs are adjusted to reflect management’s best estimate of fair value, such fair value measurements are considered a lower level measurement in the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

Other investments, which are primarily comprised of hedge funds and private equity funds for which the fair value option has been elected, are carried at fair value based upon OB Holdings’ proportionate interest in the underlying fund’s net asset value, which is deemed to approximate fair value. The fair value of OB Holdings’ investments in hedge funds and private equity funds has been estimated using net asset value because it reflects the fair value of the funds’ underlying investments in accordance with ASC 820. OB Holdings employs a number of procedures to assess the reasonableness of the fair value measurements, including obtaining and reviewing each fund’s audited financial statements and discussing each fund’s pricing with the fund’s manager. However, since the fund managers do not provide sufficient information to independently evaluate the pricing inputs and methods for each underlying investment, the inputs are considered to be unobservable. Accordingly, the fair values of OB Holdings’ investment in hedge funds and private equity funds have been classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy.

In circumstances where the underlying investments are publicly traded, such as the investments made by hedge funds, the fair value of the underlying investments is determined using current market prices. In circumstances where the underlying investments are not publicly traded, such as the investments made by private equity funds, the private equity fund managers have considered the need for a liquidity discount on each of the underlying investments when determining the fund’s net asset value in accordance with ASC 820. In circumstances where OB Holdings’ portion of a fund’s net asset value is deemed to differ from fair value due to illiquidity or other factors associated with OB Holdings’ investment in the fund, including counterparty credit risk, the net asset value is adjusted accordingly. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, OB Holdings did not record a liquidity adjustment to the net asset value related to its investments in hedge funds or private equity funds.

As of both ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other investments represented approximately 5% of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value. Other investments accounted for at fair value as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were comprised of $5453.06 million and $63.4 million, respectively, in hedge funds, $7368.39 million and $72.7 million, respectively, in private equity funds and $14.1 million for both periods of an investment in a community reinvestment vehicle. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, OB Holdings held investments in 9 and 10 hedge funds, respectively, and 14 and 15 private equity funds, respectively. The largest investment in a single fund was $2317.12 million and $24.6 million, respectively, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other investments also included $21.6 million and $21.2 million, respectively, of an investment in a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund which is accounted for using the equity method.

Table of Contents

~~The~~As ~~fair~~of ~~value measurements at March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other investments also included $21.7 million and ~~their~~$21.2 ~~related~~million, ~~inputs~~respectively, ~~are~~of asan ~~follows:~~investment in a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund which is accounted for using the equity method.

	Fair value at March 31, 2011		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	255.2	$	255.2	$	—	$	—
Debt securities issued by corporations:
Consumer	274.7		—		274.7		—
Industrial	201.7		—		201.7		—
Financial	77.0		—		76.7		0.3
Communications	70.6		—		70.6		—
Energy	58.4		—		58.4		—
Basic materials	80.1		—		80.1		—
Utilities	60.3		—		60.3		—
Technology	14.7		—		14.7		—
Debt securities issued by corporations	837.5		—		837.2		0.3
Municipal obligations	2.0		—		2.0		—
Asset-backed securities	966.8		—		966.8		—
Foreign government obligations	8.3		7.6		0.7		—
Preferred stocks	85.8		—		12.6		73.2
Fixed maturity investments	2,155.6		262.8		1,819.3		73.5
Short-term investments	213.7		213.7		—		—
Common equity securities:
Financials	103.6		64.7		—		38.9
Basic Materials	55.7		55.7		—		—
Consumer	60.6		59.9		0.1		0.6
Energy	37.8		37.8		—		—
Utilities	22.8		20.3		—		2.5
Other	16.0		15.9		0.1		—
Common equity securities	296.5		254.3		0.2		42.0
Convertible bonds	87.0		—		87.0		—
Other investments(1)	141.4		—		—		141.4
Total(1)	$	2,894.2	$	730.8	$	1,906.5	$	256.9

The fair value measurements at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and their related inputs are as follows:

	Fair value at June 30, 2011		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	222.1	$	222.1	$	—	$	—
Debt securities issued by corporations:
Consumer	265.2		—		265.2		—
Industrial	168.8		—		168.8		—
Financial	68.0		—		68.0		––
Communications	66.4		—		66.4		—
Energy	44.8		—		44.8		—
Basic materials	58.5		—		58.5		—
Utilities	63.0		—		63.0		—
Technology	14.9		—		14.9		—
Debt securities issued by corporations	749.6		—		749.6		—
Municipal obligations	2.0		—		2.0		—
Asset-backed securities	977.8		—		955.8		22.0
Foreign government obligations	8.4		7.6		0.8		—
Preferred stocks	83.0		—		12.7		70.3
Fixed maturity investments	2,042.9		229.7		1,720.9		92.3
Short-term investments	97.2		97.2		—		—
Common equity securities:
Financials	124.2		85.2		—		39.0
Basic Materials	49.6		49.6		—		—
Consumer	35.7		35.2		0.1		0.4
Energy	34.3		34.3		—		—
Utilities	23.0		20.1		—		2.9
Other	24.8		24.8		—		—
Common equity securities	291.6		249.2		0.1		42.3
Convertible bonds	75.2		—		75.2		—
Other investments(1)	136.6		—		—		136.6
Total(1)	$	2,643.5	$	576.1	$	1,796.2	$	271.2

Table of Contents

	Fair value at December 31, 2010		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	250.7	$	250.7	$	—	$	—
Debt securities issued by corporations:
Consumer	282.6		—		282.6		—
Industrial	212.7		—		212.7		—
Financial	85.7		—		85.7		—
Communications	70.9		—		70.9		—
Energy	60.7		—		60.7		—
Basic materials	76.8		—		76.8		—
Utilities	61.0		—		61.0		—
Technology	14.5		—		14.5		—
Debt securities issued by corporations	864.9		—		864.9		—
Municipal obligations	2.1		—		2.1		—
Asset-backed securities	1,029.0		—		1,001.3		27.7
Foreign government obligations	10.3		9.6		0.7		—
Preferred stocks	83.4		—		12.0		71.4
Fixed maturity investments	2,240.4		260.3		1,881.0		99.1
Short-term investments	166.8		166.8		—		—
Common equity securities:
Financials	104.1		66.7		—		37.4
Basic Materials	57.0		57.0		—		—
Consumer	50.0		49.9		0.1		—
Energy	36.0		33.7		—		2.3
Utilities	22.4		22.4		—		—
Other	15.8		15.7		0.1		—
Common equity securities	285.3		245.4		0.2		39.7
Convertible bonds	93.8		—		93.8		—
Other investments(1)	150.2		—		—		150.2
Total(1)	$	2,936.5	$	672.5	$	1,975.0	$	289.0

(1) Excludes the carrying value of $21.67 million and $21.2 million, respectively, associated with a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund accounted for using the equity method as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, OB Holdings held one private preferred stock that represented approximately 85% and 86%, respectively, of its preferred stock portfolio. OB Holdings used quoted market prices for similar securities that were adjusted to reflect management’s best estimate of fair value; this security is classified as a Level 3 measurement.

In addition to the investment portfolio described above, OB Holdings had $4544.56 million and $41.3 million, respectively, of liabilities recorded at fair value and included in other liabilities as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These liabilities relate to securities that have been sold short by a limited partnership that OB Holdings invests in and is required to consolidate in accordance with GAAP. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, $4544.35 million of these liabilities have been ~~deemed~~classified toas ~~have a~~ Level 1 ~~designation~~measurements and $0.21 million of these liabilities have been ~~deemed~~classified toas ~~have a~~ Level 2 ~~designation~~measurements. As of December 31, 2010, all of the liabilities included in the $41.3 million have been ~~deemed~~classified toas ~~have a~~ Level 1 ~~designation~~measurements.

The following table summarizes the ratings of OB Holdings’ corporate debt securities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	($ in millions)
AA	$	49.7	$	81.0
A	297.6		350.5
BBB	397.1		424.2
BB	0.7		8.8
Other	4.5		0.4
Debt securities issued by corporations	$	749.6	$	864.9

Table of Contents

~~The~~Rollforwards ~~following table summarizes the ratings~~ of OBFair ~~Holdings’~~Value ~~corporate~~Measurements ~~debt~~by ~~securities as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:~~Level

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	($ in millions)
AA	$	64.7	$	81.0
A	338.4		350.5
BBB	433.1		424.2
BB	1.0		8.8
Other	0.3		0.4
Debt securities issued by corporations	$	837.5	$	864.9

The changes in Level 1 fair value measurements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are as follows:

Asset-backed Securities

	Fixed maturity investments			Common equity securities			Convertible bonds		Other investments		Total (1)
	($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	260.3		$	245.4		$	—	$	—	$	505.7
Amortization/accretion	0.8			—			—		—		0.8
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	1.9			9.6			—		—		11.5
Purchases	130.7			24.0			—		—		154.7
Sales	(130.9		)	(24.7		)	—		—		(155.6		)
Transfers in	—			—			—		—		—
Transfers out	—			—			—		—		—
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	262.8		$	254.3		$	—	$	—	$	517.1
Amortization/accretion	0.6			—			—		—		0.6
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	0.5			(4.4		)	—		—		(3.9		)
Purchases	39.5			11.9			—		—		51.4
Sales	(73.7		)	(12.6		)	—		—		(86.3		)
Transfers in	—			—			—		—		—
Transfers out	—			—			—		—		—
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	229.7		$	249.2		$	—	$	—	$	478.9

OB Holdings purchases commercial and residential mortgage backed securities to maximize its fixed income portfolio’s risk adjusted returns in the context of a diversified portfolio. OB Holdings’ non-agency commercial mortgage-backed portfolio (~~“CMBS”~~1) Excludes ~~is generally~~ short tenor, fixed rate and structurally senior, with more than 25 points of subordination on average for fixed rate CMBS and more than 65 points of subordination on average for floating rate CMBS as of March 31, 2011. In general, subordination represents the percentage of principal loss on the underlying collateral that would have to occur before the security incurs a loss. These collateral losses, instead, are first absorbed by other securities lower in the capital structure. OB Holdings believes this structural protection mitigates the risk of loss tied to refinancing challenges facing the commercial real estate market. As of March 31, 2011, on average approximately 4% of the underlying loans were reported as non-~~performing~~term for all CMBS held by OB Holdings. OB Holdings is not an originator of residential mortgage loans and did not hold any residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) categorized as sub-prime as of March 31, 2011. In addition, OB Holdings’ investments inwhich ~~hedge~~are ~~funds~~deemed ~~and private equity funds contain negligible amounts of sub-prime mortgage backed securities as of March 31, 2011. OB Holdings considers sub-prime mortgage backed securities~~ to ~~be those that are issued from dedicated sub-prime shelves or~~ have ~~underlying loan pools that exhibit weak credit characteristics or dedicated second-lien shelf registrations (i.e., OB Holdings considers investments backed primarily by second-liens to be~~ a ~~sub-prime~~Level ~~risk~~1 ~~regardless of credit scores or other metrics)~~designation.

~~There~~The ~~are~~changes ~~also~~in ~~mortgage~~Level ~~backed~~2 ~~securities~~fair ~~that~~value OBmeasurements ~~Holdings~~for categorizes as “non-prime” (also called “Alt A” or “A-”) that are backed by collateral that has overall credit quality between prime and sub-prime, as determined based on OB Holdings’ review of the ~~characteristics~~three ~~of their underlying mortgage loan pools, such as credit scores~~ and ~~financial~~six ~~ratios.~~months Asended ~~of March~~June 3130, 2011, OBare ~~Holdings did not hold any mortgage backed securities that were classified~~ as non-prime. OB Holdings’ non-agency residential mortgage-backed portfolio is generally of moderate average life, fixed rate and structurally senior. OB Holdings does not own any collateralized debt obligations, including residential mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligations.follows:

	Fixed maturity investments			Common equity securities			Convertible bonds			Other investments		Total
	($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	1,881.0		$	0.2		$	93.8		$	—	$	1,975.0
Amortization/accretion	(4.2		)	—			0.3			—		(3.9		)
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	—			—			0.5			—		0.5
Purchases	444.8			—			12.1			—		456.9
Sales	(528.6		)	—			(21.1		)	—		(549.7		)
Transfers in	27.7			—			1.4			—		29.1
Transfers out	(1.4		)	—			—			—		(1.4		)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	1,819.3		$	0.2		$	87.0		$	—	$	1,906.5
Amortization/accretion	(3.4		)	—			0.3			—		(3.1		)
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	15.5			(0.1		)	(2.8		)	—		12.6
Purchases	318.9			—			5.9			—		324.8
Sales	(429.4		)	—			(15.2		)	—		(444.6		)
Transfers in	—			—			—			—		—
Transfers out	—			—			—			—		—
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	1,720.9		$	0.1		$	75.2		$	—	$	1,796.2

Table of Contents

The ~~following~~changes ~~table~~in ~~summarizes~~Level ~~the~~3 ~~carrying~~fair value ofmeasurements OBfor ~~Holdings’~~the ~~asset-backed~~three ~~securities~~and assix ofmonths ~~March~~ended June 3130, 2011 ~~and~~are ~~December 31,~~as ~~2010~~follows:

	March 31, 2011								December 31, 2010
	Fixed maturity investments			Common equity securities			Convertible bonds		Other investments(1)			Total(1)
	Fair Value			Level 2			Level 3		Fair Value			Level 2			Level 3
	($ in millions)
	($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	99.1		$	39.7		$	—	$	150.2		$	289.0
Mortgage-backed securities:
Amortization/accretion	—			—			—		—			—
Agency:
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	1.8			(1.3		)	—		6.2			6.7
GNMA	$	597.2		$	597.2		$	—	$	657.6		$	636.3		$	21.3
Purchases	0.3			3.7			—		1.8			5.8
FNMA	126.8			126.8			—		134.3			134.3			—
Sales	—			(0.1		)	—		(16.8		)	(16.9		)
FHLMC	14.6			14.6			—		19.0			19.0			—
Transfers in	—			—			—		—			—
Total agency(1)	738.6			738.6			—		810.9			789.6			21.3
Transfers out	(27.7		)	—			—		—			(27.7		)
Non-agency:
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	73.5		$	42.0		$	—	$	141.4		$	256.9
Residential	6.5			6.5			—		6.4			—			6.4
Amortization/accretion	—			—			—		—			—
Commercial	34.2			34.2			—		36.3			36.3			—
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	(3.4		)	0.3			—		4.2			1.1
Total Non-agency	40.7			40.7			—		42.7			36.3			6.4
Purchases	22.2			—			—		0.8			23.0
Total mortgage-backed securities	779.3			779.3			—		853.6			825.9			27.7
Sales	—			—			—		(9.8		)	(9.8		)
Other asset-backed securities:
Transfers in	—			—			—		—			—
Credit card receivables	115.2			115.2			—		67.8			67.8			—
Transfers out	—			—			—		—			—
Vehicle receivables	72.3			72.3			—		107.6			107.6			—
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	92.3		$	42.3		$	—	$	136.6		$	271.2
Total other asset-backed securities	187.5			187.5			—		175.4			175.4			—
Total asset-backed securities	$	966.8		$	966.8		$	—	$	1,029.0		$	1,001.3		$	27.7

(1) Excludes the carrying value of $21.7 million associated with a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund accounted for using the equity method.

“Transfers out” of Level 3 fixed maturity investments of $27.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were comprised of securities which had been previously classified as a Level 3 measurement and were recategorized as a Level 2 measurement when quoted market prices for similar securities that were considered reliable and could be validated against an alternative source became available.

The following table summarizes the change in net unrealized gains or losses for assets designated as Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments	$	(3.1	)	$	(3.5	)	$	(1.3	)	$	(2.8	)
Short-term investments	—			—			—			—
Common equity securities	3.1			1.5			1.8			3.9
Convertible bonds	—			—			—			—
Other investments	(1.3		)	(2.5		)	2.9			3.7
Total	$	(1.3	)	$	(4.5	)	$	3.4		$	4.8

Asset-backed Securities

OB Holdings purchases commercial and residential mortgage backed securities with the goal of maximizing its risk adjusted returns in the context of a diversified portfolio. OB Holdings’ non-agency commercial mortgage-backed portfolio (“CMBS”) is generally short tenor, fixed rate and structurally senior, with more than 20 points of subordination on average for fixed rate CMBS and more than 70 points of subordination on average for floating rate CMBS as of June 30, 2011. In general, subordination represents the percentage of principal loss on the underlying collateral that would have to occur before the security incurs a loss. These collateral losses, instead, are first absorbed by other securities lower in the capital structure. OB Holdings believes this structural protection mitigates the risk of loss tied to refinancing challenges facing the commercial real estate market. As of June 30, 2011, on average approximately 1% of the underlying loans were reported as non-performing for all CMBS held by OB Holdings. OB Holdings is not an originator of residential mortgage loans and did not hold any residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) categorized as sub-prime as of June 30, 2011. OB Holdings’ investments in hedge funds and private equity funds contain negligible amounts of sub-prime mortgage backed securities as of June 30, 2011. OB Holdings considers sub-prime mortgage backed securities to be those that have underlying loan pools that exhibit weak credit characteristics or are issued from dedicated sub-prime shelves or

Table of Contents

dedicated second-lien shelf registrations (i.e., OB Holdings considers investments backed primarily by second-liens to be a sub-prime risk regardless of credit scores or other metrics).

There are also mortgage backed securities that OB Holdings categorizes as “non-prime” (also called “Alt A” or “A-”) that are backed by collateral that has overall credit quality between prime and sub-prime, as determined based on OB Holdings’ review of the characteristics of their underlying mortgage loan pools, such as credit scores and financial ratios. As of June 30, 2011, OB Holdings did not hold any mortgage backed securities that were classified as non-prime. OB Holdings’ non-agency residential mortgage-backed portfolio is generally of moderate average life, fixed rate and structurally senior. OB Holdings does not own any collateralized debt obligations, including residential mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligations.

The following table summarizes the carrying value of OB Holdings’ asset-backed securities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Fair Value		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		Level 2		Level 3
	($ in millions)
Mortgage-backed securities:
Agency:
GNMA	$	656.5	$	634.5	$	22.0	$	657.6	$	636.3	$	21.3
FNMA	129.9		129.9		—		134.3		134.3		—
FHLMC	17.9		17.9		—		19.0		19.0		—
Total agency(1)	804.3		782.3		22.0		810.9		789.6		21.3
Non-agency:
Residential	8.1		8.1		—		6.4		—		6.4
Commercial	34.1		34.1		—		36.3		36.3		—
Total Non-agency	42.2		42.2		—		42.7		36.3		6.4
Total mortgage-backed securities	846.5		824.5		22.0		853.6		825.9		27.7
Other asset-backed securities:
Credit card receivables	54.9		54.9		—		67.8		67.8		—
Vehicle receivables	76.4		76.4		—		107.6		107.6		—
Total other asset-backed securities	131.3		131.3		—		175.4		175.4		—
Total asset-backed securities	$	977.8	$	955.8	$	22.0	$	1,029.0	$	1,001.3	$	27.7

(1) Represents publicly traded mortgage-backed securities which carry the full faith and credit guaranty of the U.S. government (i.e., GNMA) or are guaranteed by a government sponsored entity (i.e., FNMA, FHLMC).

Non-agency Mortgage-backed Securities

The security issuance years of OB Holdings’ investments in non-agency RMBS and non-agency CMBS securities as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 are as follows:

	Security Issuance Year
	Fair Value		2003		2005		2007		2010		2011
	($ in millions)
Non-agency RMBS	$	68.51	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	68.51	$	—
Non-agency CMBS	34.21		1.41		1213.90		103.82		—		$16.8	~~9.1~~
Total	$	4042.72	$	1.41	$	1213.90	$	103.82	$	68.51	$	916.18

Table of Contents

Non-agency Residential Mortgage-backed Securities

The classification of the underlying collateral quality and the tranche levels of OB Holdings’ non-agency RMBS securities are as follows as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011:

	Fair Value		Super Senior(1)		Senior(2)		Subordinate(3)
	($ in millions)
Prime	$	68.51	$	—	$	68.51	$	—
Sub-prime	—		—		—		—
Total	$	68.51	$	—	$	68.51	$	—

(1) At issuance, Super Senior were rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“Standard & Poor’s”) or Aaa by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and were senior to other AAA or Aaa bonds.

(2) At issuance, Senior were rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s and were senior to non-AAA bonds.

(3) At issuance, Subordinate were not rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s and were junior to other bonds.

Table of Contents

Non-agency Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities

The amount of fixed and floating rate securities and their tranche levels are as follows as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011:

	Fair Value		Super Senior(1)		Senior(2)		Subordinate(3)
	($ in millions)
Fixed rate CMBS	$	20.01	$	92.51	$	1018.50	$	—
Floating rate CMBS	14.20		14.20		—		—
Total	$	34.21	$	2316.71	$	1018.50	$	—

(1) At issuance, Super Senior were rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s and were senior to other AAA bonds.

(2) At issuance, Senior were rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s or Aaa by Moody’s and were senior to non-AAA or non-Aaa bonds.

(3) At issuance, Subordinate were not rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s and were senior to other bonds.

Rollforwards of Fair Value Measurements by Level

The changes in Level 1 fair value measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are as follows:

	Fixed maturity investments			Common equity securities			Convertible bonds		Other investments		Total (1)
	($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	260.3		$	245.4		$	—	$	—	$	505.7
Amortization/accretion	0.8			—			—		—		0.8
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	1.9			9.6			—		—		11.5
Purchases	130.7			24.0			—		—		154.7
Sales	(130.9		)	(24.7		)	—		—		(155.6		)
Transfers in	—			—			—		—		—
Transfers out	—			—			—		—		—
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	262.8		$	254.3		$	—	$	—	$	517.1

(1) Excludes short-term investments which are deemed to have a Level 1 designation as of March 31, 2011.

The changes in Level 2 fair value measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are as follows:

	Fixed maturity investments			Common equity securities		Convertible bonds			Other investments		Total
	($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	1,881.0		$	0.2	$	93.8		$	—	$	1,975.0
Amortization/accretion	(4.2		)	—		0.3			—		(3.9		)
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	—			—		0.5			—		0.5
Purchases	444.8			—		12.1			—		456.9
Sales	(528.6		)	—		(21.1		)	—		(549.7		)
Transfers in	27.7			—		1.4			—		29.1
Transfers out	(1.4		)	—		—			—		(1.4		)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	1,819.3		$	0.2	$	87.0		$	—	$	1,906.5

Table of Contents

The changes in Level 3 fair value measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are as follows:

	Fixed maturity investments			Common equity securities			Convertible bonds		Other investments(1)			Total(1)
	($ in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	99.1		$	39.7		$	—	$	150.2		$	289.0
Amortization/accretion	—			—			—		—			—
Total net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	1.8			(1.3		)	—		6.2			6.7
Purchases	0.3			3.7			—		1.8			5.8
Sales	—			(0.1		)	—		(16.8		)	(16.9		)
Transfers in	—			—			—		—			—
Transfers out	(27.7		)	—			—		—			(27.7		)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	73.5		$	42.0		$	—	$	141.4		$	256.9

(1) Excludes the carrying value of $21.6 million associated with a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund accounted for using the equity method.

The following table summarizes the change in net unrealized gains or losses for assets designated as Level 3 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments	$	1.8		$	2.3
Short-term investments	—			—
Common equity securities	(1.3		)	2.3
Convertible bonds	—			—
Other investments	1.5			—
Total	$	2.0		$	4.6

Table of Contents

Other Investments

OB Holdings holds investments in hedge funds and private equity funds which are included in other investments. The fair value of these investments has been estimated using the net asset value of the funds. The decrease in the fair value of hedge funds and private equity funds is due to net redemptions during the period. The following table summarizes investments in hedge funds and private equity funds at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Fair Value		Unfunded Commitments		Fair Value		Unfunded Commitments
	($ in millions)
Hedge funds
Long/short credit and distressed	$	15.54	—$	—	$	15.1	—$	—
Long bank loan	10.34		—		2.0		—
Long/short equity	35.04		—		39.8		—
Long/short equity activist	2.24		—		6.5		—
Total hedge funds	$	5453.06	—$	—	$	63.4	—$	—
Private equity funds
Insurance	$	43.24	$	0.1	$	3.5	$	0.1
Distressed residential real estate	2317.1		—		24.6		—
Energy infrastructure and services	1415.37		54.26		13.6		5.2
Healthcare	1.2		3.5		0.8		4.0
Multi-sector	19.34		5.7		19.1		6.3
Private equity secondaries	67.65		2.7		6.9		2.9
Real estate	4.6		0.5		4.2		0.7
Total private equity funds	$	7368.39	$	17.71	$	72.7	$	19.2
Total hedge funds and private equity funds(1)	$	~~127~~122.35	$	17.71	$	136.1	$	19.2

(1) Other investments also includes $14.1 million of an investment in a community reinvestment vehicle as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and $21.67 million and $21.2 million, respectively, of an investment in a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Redemptions of investments in certain funds are subject to restrictions including lock-up periods where no redemptions or withdrawals are allowed, restrictions on redemption frequency and advance notice periods for redemptions. Amounts requested for redemptions remain subject to market fluctuations until the redemption effective date, which generally falls at the end of the defined redemption period. The following summarizes the ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 fair value of hedge funds subject to restrictions on redemption frequency and advance notice period requirements for investments in active hedge funds:

	Hedge Funds—Active Funds
	30 - 59 days notice		60 - 89 days notice		90 - 119 days notice		120+ days notice		Total
	($ in millions)
Redemption frequency
Monthly	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5.97	$	5.97
Quarterly	2425.83		8.32		11.56		—		4445.61
Annual	—		—		2.24		10.34		32.58
Total	$	2425.83	$	8.32	$	1314.70	$	76.21	$	5453.06

Certain of the hedge fund investments are no longer active and are in the process of disposing of their underlying investments. Distributions from such funds are remitted to investors as the fund’s underlying investments are liquidated. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, $21.7 million of hedge funds were in liquidation. The actual amount of the final distribution is subject to market fluctuations. The date at which such distributions will be received is not determinable at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

OB Holdings has also submitted redemption requests for certain of its investments in active hedge funds. At ~~March 31~~June 30, 2011, redemptions of $2.2 million were outstanding. The date at which such redemptions will be received is not determinable at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. Redemptions are recorded as receivables when approved by the hedge funds and when no longer subject to market fluctuations.

Investments in private equity funds are generally subject to “lock-up” periods during which investors may not request a redemption. Distributions prior to the expected termination date of the fund may be limited to dividends or proceeds arising from the liquidation of the fund’s underlying investment. In addition, certain private equity funds provide an option to extend the lock-up

Table of Contents

period at either the sole discretion of the fund manager or upon agreement between the fund and the investors. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, investments in private equity funds were subject to lock-up periods as follows:

	1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		5 - 10 years		>10 years		Total
	($ in millions)
Private Equity Funds—expected lock-up period remaining	$	2720.35	$	—	$	4648.04	$	—	$	7368.39

NOTE 6. Debt

OB Holdings’ debt outstanding as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	($ in millions)
Senior unsecured notes, at face value	$	~~419~~269.9		$	419.9
Unamortized original issue discount	(0.32		)	(0.3		)
Senior unsecured notes, carrying value	$	~~419~~269.67		$	419.6

Senior Notes

In May 2003, the Company issued $700.0 million face value of senior unsecured debt through a public offering, at an issue price of 99.7% (the “Senior Notes”) and received $693.4 million of proceeds. The Senior Notes bear an annual interest rate of 5.875%, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15, until maturity on May 15, 2013, and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest by White Mountains pursuant to a separation agreement. Refer to “Note 16. Related Party Disclosures” of the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company incurred $7.3 million in expenses related to the issuance of the Senior Notes (including the $4.5 million underwriting discount), which have been deferred and are being recognized into interest expense over the life of the Senior Notes. Taking into effect the amortization of the original issue discount and all underwriting and issuance expenses, the Senior Notes have an effective yield to maturity of approximately 6.0% per annum. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under the Senior Notes.

On March 24, 2011, ~~OBH~~the Company commenced a cash tender offer for up to $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a price of $1,045 per $1,000 principal amount. The cash tender offer, which was not subject to the tender of any minimum principal amount of Senior Notes, expired on April 20, 2011. Holders of Senior Notes who tendered on or before April 6, 2011 received an early tender payment of $30 for every $1,000 principal amount of Senior Notes validly tendered. Payment for the Senior Notes included accrued and unpaid interest up to the settlement date. ~~See~~The ~~Note~~Company 13accepted and retired $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes for $161.6 million, which resulted in a $12.0 million pre-tax loss, including transaction fees.

~~During~~On ~~the~~May 3, ~~first quarter of~~ 2010, the Company ~~repurchased~~commenced ~~and~~a ~~retired~~cash tender offer for up to $11200.50 million in aggregate principal amount of ~~outstanding~~the Senior Notes ~~for~~at a price of $111,027.950 ~~million~~per $1,000 ~~which~~principal ~~resulted~~amount. inThe acash ~~$0.5~~tender ~~million~~offer, ~~loss.~~which ~~During~~was not subject to the ~~first~~tender ~~quarter~~of any minimum principal amount of Senior Notes, expired on May 28, 2010. Holders of Senior Notes who tendered on or before May 14, ~~OBIC~~2010 ~~purchased~~received an early tender payment of $30 for every $1,000 principal amount of Senior Notes validly tendered.1 Payment for the Senior Notes included accrued and unpaid interest up to the settlement date. The Company accepted and retired $156.4 million aggregate principal amount of ~~outstanding~~the Senior Notes, of which $155.2 million was tendered by the early tender deadline, for purchase for $1165.14 million, which resulted in a $9.6 million pre-tax loss, including transaction fees.

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company repurchased and retired $18.2 million of outstanding Senior Notes for $18.9 million, which resulted in a $0.7 million loss. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company repurchased and retired $11.5 million of outstanding Senior Notes for $11.9 million, which resulted in a $0.5 million loss. During the first quarter of 2010, OBIC purchased $1.1 million of outstanding Senior Notes for $1.1 million.

Other Debt of Operating Subsidiaries

In ~~connection~~April ~~with~~2011, ~~the~~OBH ~~acquisition~~entered ofinto ~~Atlantic~~a ~~Specialty~~$200.0 ~~Insurance~~million ~~Company~~revolving oncredit ~~March 31,~~facility ~~2004,~~with OBMill Shares Holdings., ~~issued~~Ltd., a ~~$20.0 million~~subsidiary ~~ten-year~~of ~~note~~OBIG, tothat ~~the~~matures ~~seller~~in ~~(the~~December ~~“Atlantic Specialty Note”)~~2013. OBIn ~~Holdings~~May ~~was~~2011, ~~required~~OBH tohad ~~repay~~drawn $240.0 million ~~of principal~~ on the ~~Atlantic Specialty Note each year, commencing in January 2007~~facility. ~~During~~In ~~the~~June ~~three months ended March 31~~2011, ~~2010,~~OBH ~~OB Holdings~~ repaid the $1440.0 million onthat ~~the~~had ~~Atlantic~~been ~~Specialty~~drawn ~~Note, representing the outstanding principal~~ on the ~~note~~facility.

In connection with the acquisition of Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company on March 31, 2004, OB Holdings issued a $20.0 million ten-year note to the seller (the “Atlantic Specialty Note”). OB Holdings was required to repay $2.0 million of principal

Table of Contents

on the Atlantic Specialty Note each year, commencing in January 2007. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, OB Holdings repaid $14.0 million on the Atlantic Specialty Note, representing the outstanding principal on the note.

NOTE 7. Segment Information

To better align its operating and reporting structure with OB Holdings’ go-forward business profile that resulted from the sale of the non-specialty commercial lines business (the “Commercial Lines Transaction”) to The Hanover Insurance Group (“The Hanover”) and the Personal Lines Transaction, which have transformed OB Holdings into a specialty lines company, management re-evaluated its segments during the fourth quarter of 2010 to determine the most effective management reporting structure. As a result, OB Holdings’ reportable segments are: (1) Specialty Insurance Operations, (2) Other Insurance Operations and (3) Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations. OB Holdings made its segment determination based on consideration of the following criteria: (i) the nature of the business activities of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates; (ii) the manner in which the Company’s subsidiaries and affiliates are organized; (iii) the existence of primary managers responsible for specific subsidiaries and affiliates; and (iv) the organization of information provided to the chief operating decision makers and OBIG’s Board of Directors ~~(the “Board”)~~.

The Specialty Insurance Operations segment is comprised of twelve underwriting units that are aggregated into three major underwriting units for financial reporting: MGA Business, Specialty Industries and Specialty Products, representing an aggregation of OB Holdings’ specialty businesses based on those that are distributed through MGAs, those that are targeted to specific industries and those that offer targeted products. Currently, OB Holdings’ specialty lines products cover or include: professional liability, marine, collector cars and boats, property and inland marine, excess property, accident and health, technology, public entities, energy, entertainment, sports and leisure, tuition reimbursement and excess and surplus lines. In determining how to aggregate OB Holdings’ specialty businesses, management considered many factors, including the nature of its insurance products and services and the production processes, the types or classes of customers, methods of distribution and the regulatory environment.

The Other Insurance Operations segment includes AutoOne and the results of the non-specialty commercial lines business which was transferred to ~~the~~The Hanover and the traditional personal lines business which was sold in the Personal Lines Transaction, other run-off business which consists of national accounts, certain specialty programs and regional agency business transferred to Liberty Mutual Insurance Group effective November 1, 2001, and certain purchase accounting adjustments relating to the OneBeacon Acquisition.

Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations includes the investing and financing activities for OB Holdings on a consolidated basis, and certain other activities conducted by the Company. Invested assets are not allocated to Specialty Insurance Operations or Other Insurance Operations since OB Holdings does not manage its assets by segment. Invested assets, net investment income and net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) related to OB Holdings’ Specialty Insurance Operations and Other Insurance Operations segments are included in the Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations segment since these assets are available for payment of losses and expenses for all segments. Debt and the related interest expense on debt also are not allocated to or managed by segment and are included in the Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations segment.

Previously, OB Holdings reported and managed its business through an Insurance Operations segment and an Other Operations segment. Within the Insurance Operations segment, OB Holdings reported and managed its specialty lines businesses within a specialty lines underwriting unit and its traditional personal lines businesses and AutoOne within a personal lines underwriting unit, nearly all of which was subject to the Personal Lines Transaction. The Insurance Operations segment also included run-off business, which consisted primarily of non-specialty commercial lines business and other run-off business. Certain other activities conducted by the Company were included in the Other Operations segment. Investing and Financing activities were included within the Insurance Operations segment if they were owned or owed by insurance company legal entities or within the Other Operations segment if they were owned or owed by the Company.

Table of Contents

Financial information for OB Holdings’ segments follows:

	Specialty Insurance Operations			Other Insurance Operations			Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations			Total
	($ in millions)
Three months ended March 31, 2011
Three months ended June 30, 2011
Earned premiums	$	~~241~~246.9		$	2118.61		$	—		$	~~263~~265.50
Loss and LAE	(~~132~~139.60		)	(12.08		)	—			(~~144~~151.68		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(4953.25		)	(1.89		)	—			(5155.04		)
Other underwriting expenses	(4642.40		)	(65.05		)	—			(5247.45		)
Total underwriting income	13.7			1.8			—			15.5
Total underwriting income (loss)	12.4			(2.1		)	—			10.3
Net investment income	—			—			1917.78			1917.78
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	—			—			219.9			219.9
Net other revenues (expenses)	0.1			0.96			(012.21		)	0(11.84		)
General and administrative expenses	(0.54		)	—			(0.74		)	(10.28		)
Interest expense on debt	—			—			(6.32		)	(6.32		)
Pre-tax income	$	13.3		$	2.7		$	34.4		$	50.4
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	12.1		$	(1.5	)	$	9.0		$	19.6
Three months ended March 31, 2010
Three months ended June 30, 2010
Earned premiums	$	~~235~~241.92		$	~~217~~187.31		$	—		$	~~453~~428.23
Loss and LAE	(~~136~~143.51		)	(~~197~~118.28		)	—			(~~333~~261.79		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(4850.39		)	(4940.24		)	—			(9791.53		)
Other underwriting expenses	(4134.18		)	(3323.17		)	—			(7458.25		)
Total underwriting income (loss)	10.0			(62.2		)	—			(52.2		)
Total underwriting income	12.4			4.2			—			16.6
Net investment income	—			—			2825.30			2825.30
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	—			—			42.4			42.4
Net realized and unrealized investment losses	—			—			(14.4		)	(14.4		)
Net other revenues (expenses)	0.26			—			(110.06		)	(010.80		)
General and administrative expenses	(0.35		)	(0.52		)	(1.21		)	(21.08		)
Interest expense on debt	—			—			(97.19		)	(97.19		)
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	912.95		$	~~(62~~4.70	)	$	59(9.40	)	$	67.65
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Earned premiums	$	488.8		$	39.7		$	—		$	528.5
Loss and LAE	(271.6		)	(24.8		)	—			(296.4		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(102.7		)	(3.7		)	—			(106.4		)
Other underwriting expenses	(88.4		)	(11.5		)	—			(99.9		)
Total underwriting income (loss)	26.1			(0.3		)	—			25.8
Net investment income	—			—			37.5			37.5
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	—			—			31.8			31.8
Net other revenues (expenses)	0.2			1.5			(12.3		)	(10.6		)
General and administrative expenses	(0.9		)	—			(1.1		)	(2.0		)
Interest expense on debt	—			—			(12.5		)	(12.5		)
Pre-tax income	$	25.4		$	1.2		$	43.4		$	70.0
Six months ended June 30, 2010
Earned premiums	$	477.1		$	404.4		$	—		$	881.5
Loss and LAE	(279.6		)	(316.0		)	—			(595.6		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(99.2		)	(89.6		)	—			(188.8		)
Other underwriting expenses	(75.9		)	(56.8		)	—			(132.7		)
Total underwriting income (loss)	22.4			(58.0		)	—			(35.6		)
Net investment income	—			—			53.3			53.3
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	—			—			28.0			28.0
Net other revenues (expenses)	0.8			—			(11.6		)	(10.8		)
General and administrative expenses	(0.8		)	(0.7		)	(2.3		)	(3.8		)
Interest expense on debt	—			—			(17.0		)	(17.0		)
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	22.4		$	(58.7	)	$	50.4		$	14.1

	Specialty Insurance Operations		Other Insurance Operations		Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations		Total
	($ in millions)
March 31, 2011
Total investments	$	—	$	—	$	2,915.8	$	2,915.8
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses	55.1		1,827.2		—		1,882.3
Deferred acquisition costs	108.8		3.2		—		112.0
Ceded unearned premiums	9.3		49.1		—		58.4
Loss and LAE reserves	846.1		2,378.6		—		3,224.7
Unearned premiums	490.2		96.3		—		586.5
Debt	—		—		419.6		419.6
December 31, 2010
Total investments	$	—	$	—	$	2,957.7	$	2,957.7
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses	60.1		1,877.6		—		1,937.7
Deferred acquisition costs	111.3		3.2		—		114.5
Ceded unearned premiums	10.8		103.1		—		113.9
Loss and LAE reserves	841.5		2,454.0		—		3,295.5
Unearned premiums	475.3		152.2		—		627.5
Debt	—		—		419.6		419.6

Table of Contents

The following tables provide net written premiums, earned premiums and ratios for OB Holdings’ insurance operations by segment and in total, as well as for the three major underwriting units within Specialty Insurance Operations, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	Specialty Insurance Operations		Other Insurance Operations		Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations		Total
	($ in millions)
June 30, 2011
Total investments	$	—	$	—	$	2,665.2	$	2,665.2
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses	60.9		1,781.2		—		1,842.1
Deferred acquisition costs	116.2		3.0		—		119.2
Ceded unearned premiums	10.3		15.9		—		26.2
Loss and LAE reserves	861.3		2,270.2		—		3,131.5
Unearned premiums	510.2		59.8		—		570.0
Debt	—		—		269.7		269.7
December 31, 2010
Total investments	$	—	$	—	$	2,957.7	$	2,957.7
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses	60.1		1,877.6		—		1,937.7
Deferred acquisition costs	111.3		3.2		—		114.5
Ceded unearned premiums	10.8		103.1		—		113.9
Loss and LAE reserves	841.5		2,454.0		—		3,295.5
Unearned premiums	475.3		152.2		—		627.5
Debt	—		—		419.6		419.6

($ in millions)	MGA Business			Specialty Industries			Specialty Products			Specialty Insurance Operations			Other Insurance Operations			Total
Three months ended March 31, 2011
Net written premiums	$	48.5		$	85.6		$	124.2		$	258.3		$	19.8		$	278.1
Earned premiums	66.0			80.9			95.0			241.9			21.6			263.5
Ratios:
Loss and LAE	45.3		%	57.0		%	59.6		%	54.8		%	55.6		%	54.9		%
Expense	42.1			42.4			35.3			39.5			36.1			39.2
Total GAAP combined	87.4		%	99.4		%	94.9		%	94.3		%	91.7		%	94.1		%
Three months ended March 31, 2010
Net written premiums	$	46.7		$	77.6		$	136.0		$	260.3		$	111.2		$	371.5
Earned premiums	63.2			72.5			100.2			235.9			217.3			453.2
Ratios:
Loss and LAE	47.8		%	59.0		%	63.3		%	57.9		%	90.7		%	73.6		%
Expense	39.7			41.2			34.4			38.1			37.9			37.9
Total GAAP combined	87.5		%	100.2		%	97.7		%	96.0		%	128.6		%	111.5		%

($ in millions)	MGA Business			Specialty Industries			Specialty Products			Specialty Insurance Operations			Other Insurance Operations(1)			Total
Three months ended June 30, 2011
Net written premiums	$	71.7		$	102.9		$	91.4		$	266.0		$	14.6		$	280.6
Earned premiums	68.3			83.7			94.9			246.9			18.1			265.0
Ratios:
Loss and LAE	53.3		%	50.9		%	63.2		%	56.3		%	n/m			57.3		%
Expense	41.6			40.4			35.1			38.7			n/m			38.8
Total GAAP combined	94.9		%	91.3		%	98.3		%	95.0		%	n/m			96.1		%
Three months ended June 30, 2010
Net written premiums	$	68.5		$	86.5		$	82.8		$	237.8		$	106.1		$	343.9
Earned premiums	67.2			73.8			100.2			241.2			187.1			428.3
Ratios:
Loss and LAE	54.5		%	52.7		%	67.4		%	59.3		%	63.5		%	61.1		%
Expense	35.7			40.4			31.9			35.4			34.2			35.0
Total GAAP combined	90.2		%	93.1		%	99.3		%	94.7		%	97.7		%	96.1		%
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Net written premiums	$	120.2		$	188.5		$	215.6		$	524.3		$	34.4		$	558.7
Earned premiums	134.3			164.6			189.9			488.8			39.7			528.5
Ratios:
Loss and LAE	49.4		%	53.9		%	61.4		%	55.6		%	n/m			56.1		%
Expense	41.8			41.4			35.2			39.1			n/m			39.0
Total GAAP combined	91.2		%	95.3		%	96.6		%	94.7		%	n/m			95.1		%
Six months ended June 30, 2010
Net written premiums	$	115.2		$	164.1		$	218.8		$	498.1		$	217.3		$	715.4
Earned premiums	130.4			146.3			200.4			477.1			404.4			881.5
Ratios:
Loss and LAE	51.3		%	55.8		%	65.4		%	58.6		%	78.1		%	67.6		%
Expense	37.6			40.8			33.2			36.7			36.2			36.5
Total GAAP combined	88.9		%	96.6		%	98.6		%	95.3		%	114.3		%	104.1		%

(1) As Other Insurance Operations consists primarily of business in run-off, GAAP ratios are not meaningful for the 2011 periods.

Table of Contents

NOTE 8. Variable Interest Entities

Reciprocals

Reciprocals are policyholder-owned insurance carriers organized as unincorporated associations. Each policyholder insured by the reciprocal shares risk with the other policyholders. Policyholders share profits and losses in the same proportion as the amount of insurance purchased but are not subject to assessment for net losses of the reciprocal.

OB Holdings had capitalized three reciprocals by loaning funds to them in exchange for surplus notes. In 2002, OB Holdings formed New Jersey Skylands Management LLC (“NJSM”) to provide management services for a fee to NJSIA, a reciprocal, and its wholly-owned subsidiary New Jersey Skylands Insurance Company (together, “New Jersey Skylands Insurance”). New Jersey Skylands Insurance was capitalized with a $31.3 million surplus note issued to OB Holdings in 2002. OB Holdings also loaned $0.2 million to New Jersey Skylands Insurance in the form of a security deposit. In 2004, OB Holdings formed Houston General Management Company to provide management services for a fee to another reciprocal, Houston General Insurance Exchange. During 2004, OB Holdings contributed $2.0 million of capital to Houston General Insurance Exchange. In 2005, OB Holdings contributed one of its subsidiaries, Houston General Insurance Company with assets of $149.4 million and liabilities of $127.6 million, to Houston General Insurance Exchange (together “Houston General Insurance”). Subsequent to the contribution of Houston General Insurance Company, Houston General Insurance Exchange issued a surplus note of $23.7 million to OB Holdings. In 2006, Adirondack AIF, LLC (“AAIF”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OB Holdings, entered into an agreement to provide management services for a fee to Adirondack Insurance, a reciprocal. Adirondack Insurance was capitalized with a $70.7 million surplus note issued to OB Holdings in May 2006. Principal and interest on the surplus notes are repayable to OB Holdings only with regulatory approval. The obligation to repay principal on the notes is subordinated to all other liabilities including obligations to policyholders and claimants for benefits under insurance policies. OB Holdings has no ownership interest in the reciprocals.

Under the provisions of ASC 810, OB Holdings had determined that each of the reciprocals qualifies as a VIE. Further, OB Holdings had determined that it is the primary beneficiary as it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE as a result of the management services provided to the reciprocal and the funds loaned to it. Accordingly, OB Holdings consolidates Houston General Insurance and, until the completion of the Personal Lines Transaction in July 2010, consolidated New Jersey Skylands Insurance and Adirondack Insurance. As described in Note 2, the Personal Lines Transaction, which was completed in July 2010, included the sale of NJSM and AAIF and the transfer of the surplus notes issued by New Jersey Skylands Insurance and Adirondack Insurance. Completion of the Personal Lines Transaction triggered deconsolidation of New Jersey Skylands Insurance and Adirondack Insurance.

24Subsequent to the Personal Lines Transaction, Houston General Insurance remains as OB Holdings’ only reciprocal. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, consolidated amounts related to Houston General Insurance included total assets of $113.1 million and $118.0 million, respectively, and total liabilities of $132.4 million and $136.2 million, respectively. At June 30, 2011, the net amount of capital at risk is equal to the surplus note of $23.7 million less the accumulated losses of $19.3 million which includes accrued interest on the surplus note of $15.7 million which eliminates in consolidation.

Table of Contents

Subsequent to the Personal Lines Transaction, Houston General Insurance remains as OB Holdings’ only reciprocal. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, consolidated amounts related to Houston General Insurance included total assets of $117.3 million and $118.0 million, respectively, and total liabilities of $136.1 million and $136.2 million, respectively. At March 31, 2011, the net amount of capital at risk is equal to the surplus note of $23.7 million less the accumulated losses of $18.8 million which includes accrued interest on the surplus note of $15.1 million which eliminates in consolidation.

NOTE 9. Retirement Plans

OneBeacon sponsors qualified and non-qualified, non-contributory, defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all employees who were employed as of December 31, 2001 and remain actively employed with OneBeacon. Current plans include a OneBeacon qualified pension plan (the “Qualified Plan”) and a OneBeacon non-qualified pension plan (the “Non-qualified Plan”) (collectively the “Plans”). OneBeacon’s Plans were frozen and curtailed in the fourth quarter of 2002.

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Service cost	$	0.2		$	0.2		$	0.4		$	0.4
Interest cost	1.3			1.5			2.6			3.0
Expected return on plan assets	(1.9		)	(1.9		)	(3.8		)	(3.8		)
Amortization of unrecognized loss	0.1			0.2			0.2			0.4
Net periodic pension cost before special termination benefits expense	(0.3		)	—
Net periodic pension income before special termination benefits expense	(0.3		)	—			(0.6		)	—
Special termination benefits expense(1)	0.2			0.2			0.4			0.4
Net periodic benefit cost	$	(0.1	)	$	0.2
Net periodic benefit (income) cost	$	(0.1	)	$	0.2		$	(0.2	)	$	0.4

(1) Special termination benefits represent additional payments made from the Qualified Plan to certain vested participants when their employment was terminated due to a reduction in force.

OneBeacon does not expect to make a contribution to its Qualified Plan in 2011. OneBeacon anticipates contributing $2.4 million to the Non-qualified Plan, for which OneBeacon has assets held in a rabbi trust. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, $01.62 million in contributions have been made to the Non-qualified Plan.

NOTE 10. Employee Share-Based Incentive Compensation Plans

OB Holdings’ share-based compensation plans consist of performance shares. OB Holdings’ share-based compensation plans are designed to maximize shareholder value over long periods of time by aligning the financial interests of its management with those of its owners. Performance shares are payable only upon achievement of pre-defined business goals and are valued based on the market value of OBIG’s common shares at the time awards are earned. See “Performance Shares” below. Performance shares are typically paid in cash, though, in some instances, they may be paid in common shares or may be deferred in accordance with the terms of one of the deferred compensation plans of the Company’s subsidiaries. OB Holdings expenses the full cost of all its share-based compensation.

OB Holdings records its share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718. ASC 718 applies to new grants of share-based awards, award modifications and the remaining portion of the fair value of unvested awards. The unvested portion of OB Holdings’ performance share awards ~~are~~is subject to the fair value measurement and recognition requirements of ASC 718.

2526

Table of Contents

Performance Shares

The following summarizes performance share activity for performance shares whose value is based upon the market price of an underlying OBIG common share (“OB Performance Shares”) for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,
	2011					2010
	Target OB Performance Shares outstanding		Accrued expense			Target OB Performance Shares outstanding		Accrued expense
	($ in millions)
Beginning of period	1718,~~464,295~~172		$	188.54		21,~~224~~812,~~215~~337		$	1516.12
Payments and deferrals (1)(2)	(936,150	)	(10.5		)	(682,344	)	(2.3		)
Payments and deferrals	—		—			—		—
New awards	~~194,900~~—		—			~~272~~6,~~411~~449		—
Forfeitures and net change in assumed forfeitures	(446,~~873~~445	)	—(0.3		)	(148,~~945~~363	)	—(0.4		)
Expense recognized	—		0.4			—		3.4
Expense (income) recognized	—		1.9			—		(0.6		)
End of period	~~718~~671,~~172~~727		$	810.40		1,~~812~~770,~~337~~423		$	1615.2

	Six months ended June 30,
	2011					2010
	Target OB Performance Shares outstanding		Accrued expense			Target OB Performance Shares outstanding		Accrued expense
	($ in millions)
Beginning of period	1,464,295		$	18.5		2,224,215		$	15.1
Payments and deferrals (1)(2)	(936,150	)	(10.5		)	(682,344	)	(2.3		)
New awards	194,900		—			278,860		—
Forfeitures and net change in assumed forfeitures	(51,318	)	(0.3		)	(50,308	)	(0.4		)
Expense recognized	—		2.3			—		2.8
End of period	671,727		$	10.0		1,770,423		$	15.2

(1) Performance share payments in 2011 for the 2008-2010 performance cycle were based upon a performance factor of 68.5%. In addition, as a result of the Commercial Lines Transaction and the Personal Lines Transaction, payments were made to certain former employees of OneBeacon prior to the end of the performance cycle (2009-2011 and 2010-2012 performance cycles) on a pro rata basis based upon a performance factor of 100%.

(2) Performance share payments in 2010 for the 2007-2009 performance cycle were based upon a performance factor of 14.2%.

The following summarizes performance shares outstanding and accrued performance share expense at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 for each performance cycle:

	Target OB Performance Shares outstanding		Accrued expense
	($ in millions)
Performance cycle:
2009—2011	~~274~~268,~~006~~035		$	67.5
2010—2012	~~267~~261,~~681~~016		12.94
2011—2013	~~194~~159,900		0.24
Sub-total	~~736~~688,~~587~~951		810.63
Assumed forfeitures	(1817,~~415~~224	)	(0.23		)
Total at March 31, 2011	718,172		$	8.4
Total at June 30, 2011	671,727		$	10.0

If 100% of the outstanding performance shares had been vested on March 31, 2011, the total additional compensation cost to be recognized would have been $7.1 million, based on current accrual factors (common share price and payout assumptions).27

All performance shares earned and paid for the 2010-2012, 2009-2011, 2008-2010 and 2007-2009 performance cycles were settled in cash or by deferral into certain non-qualified deferred compensation plans of the Company’s subsidiaries.

Table of Contents

If 100% of the outstanding performance shares had been vested at June 30, 2011, the total additional compensation cost to be recognized would have been $5.7 million, based on accrual factors at June 30, 2011 (common share price and payout assumptions).

NOTE 11. Income Taxes

OBH and its subsidiaries are domiciled in the United States. Substantially all of OB Holdings’ operations are taxed in the United States.

OB Holdings’ income tax expense related to pre-tax income for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 represented net effective tax rates of 3437.72% and ~~136~~1.3%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 represented net effective rates of 35.4% and 64.5%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 was higher than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes and an increase in the valuation allowance for the insurance reciprocal. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to recognition of a deferred tax asset for a higher tax basis in the companies sold as part of the Personal Lines Transaction, partially offset by an increase in the valuation allowance for insurance reciprocals. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was higher than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to an increase in the valuation allowance for insurance reciprocals, partially offset by recognition of a deferred tax asset for a higher tax basis in the companies sold as part of the Personal Lines Transaction.

In arriving at the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, OneBeacon forecasted the change in net realized and unrealized investment gains or losses for the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and included these gains or losses in the effective tax rate calculation pursuant to ASC 740-270.

OB Holdings classifies all interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as part of income tax expense. With few exceptions, OB Holdings is no longer subject to U.S. federal ~~and~~or state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005. OBH and its subsidiaries join in the filing of a federal consolidated tax return. The consolidated parent, which is not included in these financial statements, is OneBeacon U.S. Financial Services, Inc. (“OBFS”). In October 2008, the IRS commenced examination of OBFS’ U.S. income tax returns for 2005 and 2006. On January 5, 2011, OBFS received a revised Form 4549-A (Income Tax Discrepancy Adjustments) from the IRS relating to the examination of tax years 2005 and 2006. The estimated total assessment, including interest and utilization of alternative minimum and foreign tax credit carryovers, is $18.7 million. The total assessment relating to OB Holdings, including interest, is $19.4 million. OBFS disagrees with the adjustments proposed by the IRS and intends to defend its position. The timing of the resolution of these issues is uncertain, however, it is reasonably possible that the resolution could occur within the next twelve months. An estimate of the range of potential outcomes cannot be made at this time. When ultimately settled, OB Holdings does not expect the resolution of this examination to result in a material change to its financial position.

NOTE 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 825 requires disclosure of fair value information of financial instruments. For certain financial instruments where quoted market prices are not available, other independent valuation techniques and assumptions are used. Because considerable judgment is used, these estimates are not necessarily indicative of amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. Certain financial instruments are excluded from disclosure, including insurance contracts, other than financial guarantees and investment contracts. OB Holdings carries its financial instruments on its balance sheet at fair value with the exception of its fixed-rate, long-term indebtedness.

The fair values of the fixed-rate, long-term indebtedness were estimated by discounting future cash flows using current market rates for similar obligations or using quoted market prices. Considerable judgment is required to develop such estimates of fair value. Therefore, the estimate provided herein is not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of OBH’s Senior Notes (its fixed-rate, long-term indebtedness) was $~~439~~282.2 million and $435.1 million, respectively, which compared to a carrying value of $~~419~~269.67 million asand of$419.6 ~~both March 31~~million, ~~2011 and December 31, 2010~~respectively.

~~NOTE 13. Subsequent Events~~28

On April 20, 2011, OBH entered into a $200.0 million revolving credit facility with Mill Shares Holdings, Ltd., a subsidiary of OBIG, that matures in December 2013. As of May 10, 2011, OBH has drawn $40.0 million on the facility.

On April 21, 2011, OBH accepted and retired $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its Senior Notes for $161.6 million, which resulted in a $12.0 million pre-tax loss, including transaction fees, that will be recognized in the second quarter of 2011. As of May 10, 2011, approximately $270 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes is outstanding.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion contains “forward-looking statements.” Statements that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements. OB Holdings cannot promise that ~~its~~our expectations in such forward-looking statements will turn out to be correct. OB Holdings’ actual results could be materially different from and worse than its expectations. See “Forward-Looking Statements” on page 4449 for specific important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements.

Significant Transactions

Historically, we have offered a range of specialty, commercial and personal products and services, however, in the wake of recent transactions we are now focused exclusively on specialty business. In addition, the transactions freed up significant capital, increased our financial flexibility and substantially reduced our catastrophe exposure.

Commercial lines. On December 3, 2009, we sold the renewal rights to our non-specialty commercial lines business (the Commercial Lines Transaction) to The Hanover Insurance Group (The Hanover). The transaction included small commercial accounts and the non-specialty portion of the middle-market business, beginning with January 1, 2010 effective dates. We continue to manage claims from business written prior to the Commercial Lines Transaction. Through June 30, 2010, we also managed claims from business fronted by OneBeacon and reinsured to The Hanover. We continue to provide claims system access and first notice of loss service to The Hanover. The Hanover reimburses us for our expenses incurred to provide the claims administration services.

Personal lines. On July 1, 2010, we completed the sale of our traditional personal lines business (the Personal Lines Transaction) to Tower Group, Inc. (Tower). The Personal Lines Transaction included two insurance companies through which the majority of the traditional personal lines business was written on a direct basis, two attorneys-in-fact managing the reciprocals that wrote the traditional personal lines business in New York and New Jersey, the surplus notes issued by the New York and New Jersey reciprocals and the remaining renewal rights to certain other traditional personal lines insurance policies. In addition, the Personal Lines Transaction included the execution of reinsurance agreements with certain subsidiaries of the Company pursuant to which we cede, on a 100% quota share basis, traditional personal lines business not directly written by companies included in the sale and assume, on a 100% quota share basis, non-traditional personal lines business written directly by York Insurance Company of Maine. OneBeacon and Tower also entered into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA), pursuant to which we provide certain services to Tower during the three-year term of the TSA. Tower reimburses us for all of our expenses incurred to provide these services. Reimbursement for these services is netted against the expense incurred.

Recent Developments

To better align our operating and reporting structure with our business profile as a result of the transactions, we revised our segment structure into Specialty Insurance Operations, Other Insurance Operations and Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations. As part of the resegmentation, agency results for business written on our paper and in which we have an ownership interest have been reclassified within underwriting results. Previously, we reported and managed our business through an Insurance Operations segment and an Other Operations segment. Within the Insurance Operations segment, we reported and managed our specialty lines businesses within a specialty lines underwriting unit and our traditional personal lines businesses and AutoOne Insurance (AutoOne) within a personal lines underwriting unit, nearly all of which was subject to the Personal Lines Transaction. The Insurance Operations segment also included run-off business, which consisted primarily of non-specialty commercial lines business and other run-off business. Certain other activities conducted by the Company were included in our Other Operations segment. Investing and Financing activities were included within the Insurance Operations segment if they were owned or owed by insurance company legal entities or within the Other Operations segment if they were owned or owed by the Company. The prior ~~period~~periods ~~has~~have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

2829

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Review of Consolidated Results

A summary of our consolidated financial results for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net written premiums	$	~~278~~280.16		$	~~371~~343.59		$	558.7		$	715.4
Revenues
Earned premiums	$	~~263~~265.50		$	~~453~~428.23		$	528.5		$	881.5
Net investment income	1917.78			2825.30			37.5			53.3
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	21.9			42.4
Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses)	9.9			(14.4		)	31.8			28.0
Net other revenues (expenses)	0.8			(0.8		)
Net other expenses	(11.4		)	(10.0		)	(10.6		)	(10.8		)
Total revenues	~~305~~281.93			~~523~~428.19			587.2			952.0
Expenses
Loss and LAE	~~144~~151.68			~~333~~261.79			296.4			595.6
Policy acquisition expenses	5155.04			9791.53			106.4			188.8
Other underwriting expenses	5247.45			7458.25			99.9			132.7
General and administrative expenses	10.28			21.08			2.0			3.8
Interest expense on debt	6.32			97.19			12.5			17.0
Total expenses	~~255~~261.57			~~516~~421.54			517.2			937.9
Pre-tax income	5019.46			67.65			70.0			14.1
Income tax expense	(177.53		)	(9.0.1		)	(24.8		)	(9.1		)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interests	32.9			(2.4		)
Net income including noncontrolling interests	12.3			7.4			45.2			5.0
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.45		)	(0.35		)	(0.9		)	(0.8		)
Net income (loss) attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	32.5			(2.7		)
Net income attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	11.8			6.9			44.3			4.2
Change in other comprehensive income and loss items	~~0.1~~—			~~0.2~~—			0.1			0.2
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	$	32.6		$	(2.5	)
Comprehensive income attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder	$	11.8		$	6.9		$	44.4		$	4.4

The following table provides ratios of our consolidated underwriting results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)(4)
Loss and LAE	54.9	%	73.6	%
Expense	39.2		37.9
Total GAAP combined	94.1	%	111.5	%

(1) As part of the resegmentation, agency results for business written on our paper and in which we have an ownership interest have been reclassified within the underwriting results. Financial information for the prior period has been reclassified to conform to this presentation.

(2) Includes our long-term incentive compensation expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our total combined ratio by 2.0 points and 2.6 points, respectively.

(3) Includes loss and LAE relating to catastrophes. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, total calendar year incurred loss and LAE relating to catastrophes increased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 3.9 points and 9.7 points, respectively, including development on prior accident year catastrophes which increased (decreased) our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 1.1 points and (0.1) point, respectively.

(4) Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 decreased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 1.9 points and 1.3 points, respectively.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results— Three months ended March 31, 2011 versus three months ended March 31, 2010

Our comprehensive income attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder was $32.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to a comprehensive loss attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder of $2.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. Net income attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder was $32.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to net loss attributable to OB Holdings’ common shareholder of $2.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Our total revenues decreased 41.5% to $305.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $523.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease included a 41.9% reduction in earned premiums primarily due to the Personal Lines Transaction. Net realized and unrealized investment gains decreased by 48.3% to $21.9 million, compared to $42.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. Net investment income decreased 30.4% to $19.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to a 26.5% decline in average invested assets. The decline in average invested assets since March 31, 2010 was driven by the Personal Lines Transaction, repurchases of debt and the Commercial Lines Transaction, including the impact of claim payments related to non-specialty commercial lines reserves. Net other revenues (expenses) increased to $0.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $(0.8) million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The three months ended March 31, 2011 includes $0.9 million in additional consideration for aggregate premium renewals exceeding $200 million related to the Commercial Lines Transaction. The three months ended March 31, 2010 included a $0.5 million loss related to the purchase of a portion of our senior notes.

Our total expenses decreased 50.5% in the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $255.5 million, compared to $516.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. Loss and LAE decreased 56.7% to $144.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, reflective of the decrease in our book of business resulting from the Commercial Lines Transaction and Personal Lines Transaction, as well as lower current accident year catastrophe losses. Current accident year catastrophe losses were $7.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $44.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The three months ended March 31, 2010 also included a number of large losses, particularly in businesses we have exited as well as our property and inland marine business. Policy acquisition expenses decreased by 47.7% to $51.0 million and other underwriting expenses decreased 29.4% to $52.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, reflective of the shrink in our book of business resulting from the Commercial Lines Transaction and Personal Lines Transaction. General and administrative expenses decreased 40.0% to $1.2 million. Interest expense decreased 30.8% in line with the reduction in outstanding debt.

Our income tax expense related to pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 represented net effective tax rates of 34.7% and 136.4%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was higher than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to an increase in the valuation allowance for the insurance reciprocals. In arriving at the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we forecasted the change in net realized and unrealized investment gains or losses for the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and included these gains or losses in the effective tax rate calculation pursuant to ASC 740-270.

Our GAAP combined ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased to 94.1% from 111.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 18.7 points to 54.9% while the expense ratio increased by 1.3 points to 39.2%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to a decrease in current accident year catastrophe and non-catastrophe losses. The three months ended March 31, 2011 included $7.3 million or 2.8 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, as compared to $44.3 million or 9.8 points of current accident year catastrophe losses in the three months ended March 31, 2010. We also experienced a number of large losses in our property and inland marine business within Specialty Insurance Operations and in our non-specialty commercial lines business within Other Insurance Operations during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The three months ended March 31, 2011 included $5.1 million or 1.9 points of favorable loss reserve development, as compared to $6.0 million or 1.3 points of favorable loss reserve development in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The favorable loss reserve development was primarily related to lower than expected severity on non-catastrophe losses on professional liability lines, multiple peril liability lines and other general liability lines. The expense ratio increased primarily due to other underwriting expenses that have not decreased proportionately with the reduction in earned premium associated with the exited businesses, partially offset by a decrease in policy acquisition expenses.

Summary of Operations By Segment

Specialty Insurance Operations is comprised of twelve underwriting units that are aggregated into three major underwriting units: MGA Business, Specialty Industries and Specialty Products. Other Insurance Operations includes AutoOne, the non-specialty commercial lines business and traditional personal lines business, other run-off business and certain purchase accounting adjustments relating to the OneBeacon Acquisition. Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations includes the investing and financing activities for OB Holdings on a consolidated basis, and certain other activities conducted by our top holding company, OneBeacon U.S.

Table of Contents

~~Holdings, Inc.~~The ~~(OBH).~~following ~~The~~table ~~prior~~provides ~~period~~ratios ~~has~~of ~~been~~our ~~reclassified~~consolidated tounderwriting ~~conform~~results tofor the ~~current~~three ~~presentation.~~and ~~Our~~six ~~segment~~months ~~information~~ended ~~is presented in Note~~June ~~7—“Segment~~30, ~~Information”~~2011 ofand ~~the accompanying consolidated financial statements.~~2010:

Specialty Insurance Operations

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)(4)
Loss and LAE	57.3	%	61.1	%	56.1	%	67.6	%
Expense	38.8		35.0		39.0		36.5
Total GAAP combined	96.1	%	96.1	%	95.1	%	104.1	%

~~Financial~~(1) As part of the resegmentation, agency results for ~~our~~business ~~Specialty~~written ~~Insurance~~on ~~Operations~~OB ~~segment~~Holdings paper and in which OB Holdings has an ownership interest have been reclassified within the underwriting results. Financial information for the ~~three~~prior ~~months~~periods ~~ended~~has ~~March 31,~~been ~~2011~~reclassified ~~and~~to ~~2010~~conform ~~were~~to asthis ~~follows:~~presentation.

	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net written premiums	$	258.3		$	260.3
Earned premiums	$	241.9		$	235.9
Loss and LAE	(132.6		)	(136.5		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(49.2		)	(48.3		)
Other underwriting expenses	(46.4		)	(41.1		)
Total underwriting income	13.7			10.0
Net other revenues	0.1			0.2
General and administrative expenses	(0.5		)	(0.3		)
Pre-tax income	$	13.3		$	9.9

(2) Includes our long-term incentive compensation expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our total combined ratio by 1.9 points and 0.9 points, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our total combined ratio by 1.9 points and 1.8 points, respectively.

~~The~~(3) Includes ~~following~~loss ~~table~~and ~~provides~~LAE ~~net~~relating ~~written~~to ~~premiums~~catastrophes. For the three months ended June 30, ~~earned~~2011 ~~premiums~~and 2010, total calendar year incurred loss and ~~underwriting~~LAE relating to catastrophes increased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by ~~major~~5.2 ~~underwriting~~points ~~unit~~ and ~~Specialty~~2.3 ~~Insurance~~points, ~~Operations~~respectively, inincluding development on prior accident year catastrophes which had no impact on our loss and LAE and total ~~for~~combined ratios. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010:, total calendar year incurred loss and LAE relating to catastrophes increased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 4.5 points and 6.1 points, respectively, including development on prior accident year catastrophes which increased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0.5 points and 0, respectively.

	MGA Business			Specialty Industries			Specialty Products			Specialty Insurance Operations
	($ in millions)
Three months ended March 31, 2011
Net written premiums	$	48.5		$	85.6		$	124.2		$	258.3
Earned premiums	66.0			80.9			95.0			241.9
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Loss and LAE	45.3		%	57.0		%	59.6		%	54.8		%
Expense	42.1			42.4			35.3			39.5
Total GAAP combined	87.4		%	99.4		%	94.9		%	94.3		%
Three months ended March 31, 2010
Net written premiums	$	46.7		$	77.6		$	136.0		$	260.3
Earned premiums	63.2			72.5			100.2			235.9
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Loss and LAE	47.8		%	59.0		%	63.3		%	57.9		%
Expense	39.7			41.2			34.4			38.1
Total GAAP combined	87.5		%	100.2		%	97.7		%	96.0		%

(4) Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 decreased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 3.8 points and 4.3 points, respectively. Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 decreased our loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 2.9 points and 2.7 points, respectively.

~~(1) Includes~~Consolidated ~~our~~Results—Three ~~long-term incentive compensation expense. For the three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~and~~versus ~~2010,~~three ~~long-term~~months ~~incentive~~ended ~~compensation expense increased our Specialty Insurance Operations combined ratio by 1.9 points and 2.6 points~~June 30, ~~respectively.~~2010

~~(2) Includes~~Our ~~loss~~comprehensive ~~and~~income ~~LAE~~attributable ~~relating~~ to ~~catastrophes~~OB Holdings’ common shareholder was $11.8 ~~For~~million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~and 2010~~, ~~total~~compared ~~calendar~~to ~~year~~$6.9 ~~incurred~~million ~~loss~~in ~~and~~the ~~LAE~~three ~~relating~~months toended ~~catastrophes~~June 30, ~~increased~~2010. ~~our~~Net ~~Specialty~~income ~~Insurance~~attributable ~~Operations~~to ~~loss~~OB ~~and~~Holdings’ ~~LAE~~common ~~and~~shareholder ~~total~~was ~~combined~~$11.8 ~~ratios~~million byin ~~3.7~~the ~~points~~three ~~and~~months ~~4.6~~ended ~~points~~June 30, ~~respectively~~2011, ~~including~~compared ~~development~~to on$6.9 ~~prior~~million ~~accident~~in ~~year~~the ~~catastrophes~~three ~~which~~months ~~increased~~ended ~~our Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0.7 points and 0.2 points~~June 30, ~~respectively~~2010.

(Our total revenues decreased 34.4% to $281.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $428.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease included a 38.1% reduction in earned premiums primarily due to the Personal Lines Transaction and the Commercial Lines Transaction. Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) ~~Prior~~ ~~accident~~increased ~~year~~168.8% ~~development~~to $9.9 million, ~~including~~compared ~~development~~to on$(14.4) ~~catastrophes~~million in the three months ended June 30, ~~for~~2010. Net investment income decreased 28.8% to $17.8 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 due to a 27.9% decline in average invested assets. The decline in average invested assets since June 30, 2010 was driven by the Personal Lines Transaction, repurchases of debt and the Commercial Lines Transaction, including the impact of claim payments related to non-specialty commercial lines reserves. Net other expenses increased to $11.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $10.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. ~~decreased~~The slight increase reflects a $12.0 million loss related to the purchase of a portion of our ~~Specialty~~senior ~~Insurance~~notes ~~Operations~~in the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to a $10.3 million loss ~~and~~related ~~LAE~~to ~~and~~the ~~total~~purchase ~~combined~~of ~~ratios~~a byportion of our senior notes in the three months ended June 30, 2010. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we repurchased and retired $150.0 million aggregate principal of senior notes as a result of a cash tender offer.5 ~~points~~During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we repurchased and 1retired $174.16 ~~points~~million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, ~~respectively~~including $156.4 million as a result of a cash tender offer.

Our total expenses decreased 37.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $261.7 million, compared to $421.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Loss and LAE decreased 42.0% to $151.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, reflective of the decrease in our book of business resulting from the Commercial Lines Transaction and Personal Lines Transaction, partially offset by higher current accident year catastrophe losses. Current accident year catastrophe losses were $13.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $9.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Policy acquisition expenses

Table of Contents

~~Specialty~~decreased ~~Insurance~~39.3% ~~Operations—Three~~to ~~months~~$55.4 ~~ended~~million ~~March 31,~~and ~~2011~~other ~~versus~~underwriting expenses decreased 18.8% to $47.5 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011, reflective of the shrink in our book of business resulting from the Commercial Lines Transaction and Personal Lines Transaction. General and administrative expenses decreased 55.6% to $0.8 million. Interest expense decreased 21.5% to $6.2 million in line with the reduction in outstanding debt.

~~Overview. We~~Our ~~reported~~income atax ~~GAAP~~expense ~~combined~~related ~~ratio~~to pre-tax income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 represented net effective tax rates of 9437.2% and 1.3%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~compared~~was tohigher 96than the U.0S. statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes and an increase in the valuation allowance for the insurance reciprocal. The effective tax rate for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. ~~The~~was ~~decrease~~lower inthan ~~our~~the ~~combined~~U.S. ~~ratio~~statutory ~~was~~rate ~~primarily~~of 35% due to ~~lower~~recognition ~~current~~of ~~accident~~a ~~year~~deferred ~~catastrophe~~tax ~~and~~asset ~~non-catastrophe~~for ~~losses~~a higher tax basis in the companies sold as part of the Personal Lines Transaction, partially offset by ~~lower~~an ~~favorable~~increase ~~loss~~in ~~reserve~~the ~~development~~valuation allowance for insurance reciprocals. In arriving at the effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and ~~higher~~2010, ~~other~~we ~~underwriting~~forecasted ~~expenses~~the change in net realized and unrealized investment gains or losses for the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and included these gains or losses in the effective tax rate calculation pursuant to ASC 740-270.

~~MGA~~Our ~~Business. Net~~GAAP ~~written~~combined ~~premiums~~ratio for ~~MGA~~the ~~Business~~three months ended June 30, 2011 was unchanged at 96.1% from the three months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 3.8 points to 57.3% while the expense ratio increased by 3.98 points to 38.8%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to ~~$48~~a decrease in current accident year non-catastrophe losses.~~5 million~~ We experienced a number of large losses in our property and inland marine business within Specialty Insurance Operations during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The decrease was partially offset by current accident year catastrophe losses and less favorable loss reserve development. The three months ended June 30, 2011 ~~from~~included $4613.7 million or 5.2 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, as compared to $9.8 million or 2.3 points of current accident year catastrophe losses in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The ~~increase~~three months ended June 30, 2011 included $10.1 million or 3.8 points of favorable loss reserve development, as compared to $18.3 million or 4.3 points of favorable loss reserve development in the ~~prior~~three ~~year~~months ~~period~~ended June 30, 2010. The favorable loss reserve development was primarily ~~due~~related to alower ~~$2.1~~than ~~million~~expected ~~increase~~severity inon ~~net~~non-catastrophe ~~written~~losses ~~premiums~~on ~~from~~professional ~~our~~liability ~~collector~~lines, ~~cars~~multiple ~~and~~peril ~~boats~~liability ~~business~~lines asand ~~well~~other asgeneral aliability $0lines.~~7 million~~ ~~increase~~The infavorable ~~net~~development ~~written~~in ~~premiums~~the ~~from~~three ~~A.W.G.~~months ~~Dewar~~ended June 30, ~~partially~~2010 ~~offset~~also byincluded a one-time $16.05 million ~~decrease~~release of commercial and personal auto reserves associated with participation in ~~net~~an ~~written~~involuntary ~~premiums~~auto ~~from~~pool. ~~OneBeacon~~The ~~Entertainment~~expense ~~(OBE)~~ratio increased primarily due to other underwriting expenses that have not decreased proportionately with the reduction in earned premium associated with the exited businesses, partially offset by a decrease in policy acquisition expenses.

~~The~~Consolidated ~~MGA~~Results—Six ~~Business combined ratio for the three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~decreased~~versus ~~slightly~~six ~~to 87.4% from 87.5% for the three~~ months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 2.5 points to 45.3%, while the expense ratio increased by 2.4 points to 42.1%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio reflects a decrease in current accident year catastrophe and non-catastrophe losses as compared with the prior year period. The three months ended March 31, 2011 includes 0.5 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to storms in the eastern and central United States, as compared to 3.0 points, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern and southeastern United States which impacted our collector cars and boats business, in the three months ended March 31, 2010. Additionally, current accident year non-catastrophe losses were 1.9 points lower than the prior year period as the three months ended March 31, 2010 included the impact of several large losses at OBE. The decrease was partially offset by a 1.9 point increase in adverse loss reserve development. The three months ended March 31, 2011 included 6.7 points of adverse loss reserve development, compared to 4.8 points of adverse loss reserve development primarily related to OBE. The increase in the expense ratio was driven by higher other underwriting expenses related to compensation, partially offset by lower policy acquisition expenses.

~~Specialty~~Our ~~Industries. Net~~comprehensive ~~written~~income ~~premiums~~attributable ~~for~~to ~~Specialty~~OB ~~Industries~~Holdings’ ~~increased~~common byshareholder ~~10.3%~~was to $8544.6 4 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~from~~compared to $774.6 4 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. ~~The~~Net ~~increase~~income ~~was~~attributable ~~due~~ to ~~solid~~OB ~~retention~~Holdings’ ~~levels~~common ~~for~~shareholder ~~many of the businesses despite competition in the marketplace. The increase compared to the prior year period~~ was ~~due to a~~ $544.0 3 million ~~increase~~ in ~~net~~the ~~written~~six ~~premiums~~months ~~from~~ended ~~OneBeacon Government Risks~~June 30, ~~a $2.8 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Technology Insurance (OBTI)~~2011, acompared ~~$1.6 million~~to ~~increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Energy Group and a~~ $14.12 million ~~increase~~ in ~~net~~the ~~written~~six ~~premiums~~months ~~from~~ended ~~OneBeacon Accident Group~~June 30, ~~partially offset by a $2~~2010.~~5 million decrease in net written premiums from International Marine Underwriters (IMU).~~

~~The~~Our ~~Specialty~~total ~~Industries~~revenues ~~combined~~decreased ~~ratio~~38.3% ~~for~~to $587.2 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~decreased~~compared to 99$952.4%0 ~~from~~million ~~100.2%~~in ~~for~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The ~~loss~~decrease ~~and~~included ~~LAE~~a ~~ratio~~40.0% ~~decreased~~reduction byin ~~2.0~~earned ~~points~~premiums toprimarily ~~57.0%~~due ~~while~~to the ~~expense~~Personal ~~ratio~~Lines ~~increased~~Transaction byand 1the Commercial Lines Transaction.2 ~~points~~Net torealized 42and unrealized investment gains increased 13.46% to $31.8 ~~The~~million, ~~decrease~~compared to $28.0 million in the ~~loss~~six ~~and~~months ~~LAE~~ended ~~ratio~~June 30, ~~was~~2010. ~~primarily~~Net ~~due~~investment toincome ~~loss~~decreased ~~reserve~~29.6% ~~development~~to $37.5 ~~The~~million ~~three~~in the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~included~~due 3to a 27.95% ~~points~~decline ofin ~~favorable~~average ~~loss~~invested ~~reserve~~assets. ~~development~~The ~~primarily~~decline ~~related~~in toaverage ~~OBTI~~invested ~~and~~assets ~~IMU~~since June 30, ~~compared~~2010 towas ~~1.2~~driven ~~points~~by ofthe ~~adverse~~Personal ~~loss~~Lines ~~reserve~~Transaction, ~~development~~repurchases ~~primarily~~of ~~related~~debt toand ~~OBTI~~the inCommercial Lines Transaction, including the ~~prior~~impact ~~year~~of ~~period.~~claim ~~This~~payments ~~was~~related ~~partially~~to ~~offset~~non-specialty bycommercial alines 3reserves. Net other expenses decreased 1.9% ~~point~~to ~~increase~~$10.6 million in ~~current~~the ~~accident~~six ~~year~~months ~~losses~~ended June 30, 2011, compared ~~with~~to $10.8 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~included~~includes 5a $12.70 ~~points~~million ofloss ~~current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily~~ related to ~~storms in~~ the ~~eastern,~~purchase ~~central~~of ~~and~~a ~~western~~portion ~~United~~of ~~States~~our ~~impacting~~senior ~~IMU~~notes, aspartially ~~compared~~offset toby 2$0.8 ~~points~~million ofin ~~current~~additional ~~accident~~consideration ~~year~~for ~~catastrophe~~aggregate ~~losses,~~premium ~~primarily~~renewals ~~related~~exceeding to$200 ~~severe~~million ~~wind~~related ~~and~~to ~~rainstorms in~~ the ~~northeastern~~Commercial ~~United~~Lines ~~States~~Transaction, ~~impacting~~as ~~IMU.~~compared ~~The~~to ~~increase~~a in$10.8 ~~the~~million ~~expense~~loss ~~ratio~~related ~~was due~~ to ~~increases~~the inpurchase ~~both~~of ~~policy~~a ~~acquisition~~portion ~~expenses,~~of ~~primarily~~our ~~related~~senior tonotes ~~changes~~ in ~~mix~~the ofsix ~~business,~~months ~~and~~ended ~~other underwriting expenses~~June 30, ~~primarily related to compensation~~2010.

~~Specialty~~Our ~~Products~~total expenses decreased 44. ~~Net~~9% ~~written~~in ~~premiums~~the ~~for~~six ~~Specialty~~months ~~Products~~ended ~~decreased~~June 30, by2011 8to $517.7%2 million, compared to $~~124~~937.29 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Loss and LAE decreased 50.2% to $296.4 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, reflective of the decrease in our book of business resulting from the Commercial Lines Transaction and Personal Lines Transaction, as well as lower current accident year catastrophe losses. Current accident year catastrophe losses were $~~136~~21.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $54.1 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The ~~decrease~~six ~~was~~months ~~primarily~~ended ~~due~~June 30, to2010, also included a ~~$7.7 million~~number ~~decrease~~of large losses, particularly in ~~net~~businesses ~~written~~we ~~premiums~~have ~~from~~exited ~~OneBeacon~~as ~~Professional~~well ~~Insurance~~as ~~primarily~~our ~~related~~property toand ~~the~~inland ~~medical~~marine ~~excess~~business. ~~line~~Policy acquisition expenses decreased 43.6% to $106.4 million and aother underwriting expenses decreased 24.7% to $599.09 million ~~decrease~~in the six months ended June 30, 2011, reflective of the shrink in ~~net~~our ~~written~~book ~~premiums~~of business resulting from ~~OneBeacon~~the ~~Property~~Commercial Lines Transaction and ~~Inland~~Personal ~~Marine~~Lines ~~(PIM),~~Transaction. ~~reflecting~~The asix ~~revised~~months ~~underwriting~~ended ~~strategy~~June 30, ~~offset~~2010 byincluded aamortization ~~$0.7 million~~of ~~increase~~previously indeferred ~~net~~acquisition ~~written~~costs ~~premiums~~within ~~from~~the ~~OneBeacon~~non-specialty ~~Specialty~~commercial ~~Property~~lines ~~and~~business $0as a result of the Commercial Lines Transaction.2 ~~million~~Additionally, inthere ~~net~~were ~~written~~also ~~premiums~~changes ~~from~~in ~~OneBeacon~~the ~~Excess~~overall mix of business and ~~Surplus~~the ~~which~~mix weof ~~began~~products ~~writing~~offered within the businesses, partially offset by changes in ~~2011.~~the deferral rate of

The Specialty Products combined ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased to 94.9% from 97.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 3.7 points to 59.6% while the expense ratio increased by 0.9 points to 35.3%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to a 7.6 point decrease in current accident year losses, compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010. The three months ended March 31, 2011 included 2.5 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to storms in the eastern, central and western United States impacting PIM, compared to 6.4 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern

Table of Contents

~~United~~policy ~~States.~~acquisition ~~Current~~expenses ~~accident~~to ~~year~~better ~~non-catastrophe~~align ~~losses~~with ~~decreased~~the ~~3.7~~individual ~~points.~~products ~~The~~within ~~three months ended March 31, 2010 included~~ the ~~impact~~respective ~~of a number of large losses experienced at PIM~~businesses. ~~The~~General ~~decrease~~and inadministrative ~~current~~expenses ~~accident~~decreased ~~year losses was partially offset by less favorable loss reserve development~~47.4% ~~The~~to ~~three months ended March 31, 2011 included~~ $2.60 ~~points~~million. ofInterest ~~favorable~~expense ~~loss~~decreased ~~reserve development primarily related to professional liability, compared to 6~~26.5% ~~points of favorable loss reserve development related to professional liability~~ in ~~the~~line ~~prior~~with ~~year period. The increase in~~ the ~~expense~~reduction ~~ratio was primarily due to an increase~~ in ~~other~~outstanding ~~underwriting expenses, partially offset by a decrease in policy acquisition expenses related to changes in mix of business~~debt.

~~Reinsurance~~Our ~~protection. We~~income ~~purchase~~tax ~~reinsurance~~expense inrelated ~~order~~ to ~~minimize~~pre-tax ~~loss~~income ~~from~~for ~~large~~the ~~risks~~six ormonths ~~catastrophic~~ended ~~events~~June 30, 2011 and 2010 represented net effective tax rates of 35.4% Weand ~~also~~64.5%, ~~purchase~~respectively. ~~individual~~The ~~property~~effective ~~reinsurance~~tax ~~coverage~~rate for ~~certain~~the ~~risks~~six tomonths ~~reduce~~ended ~~large~~June 30, ~~loss~~2011 ~~volatility~~was ~~through~~higher ~~property-per-risk~~than ~~excess~~the U.S. statutory rate of ~~loss~~35% ~~reinsurance~~due ~~programs~~to state income taxes and ~~individual~~an ~~risk~~increase ~~facultative~~in ~~reinsurance~~the valuation allowance for the insurance reciprocal. WeThe ~~also~~effective ~~maintain~~tax ~~excess~~rate offor ~~loss~~the ~~casualty~~six ~~reinsurance~~months ~~programs~~ended ~~that~~June 30, ~~provide~~2010 ~~protection~~was ~~for~~higher ~~individual~~than ~~risk~~the orU.S. ~~catastrophe~~statutory ~~losses~~rate ~~involving~~of ~~workers~~35% ~~compensation,~~due ~~general~~to ~~liability,~~an ~~automobile~~increase ~~liability,~~in ~~professional~~the ~~liability~~valuation orallowance ~~umbrella~~for ~~liability.~~insurance ~~The~~reciprocals, ~~availability~~partially ~~and~~offset ~~cost~~by recognition of ~~reinsurance~~a ~~protection~~deferred istax ~~subject~~asset tofor ~~market~~a ~~conditions,~~higher ~~which~~tax ~~are~~basis ~~outside~~in the companies sold as part of ~~our~~the ~~control~~Personal Lines Transaction. ~~Limiting~~In ~~our~~arriving ~~risk~~at ofthe ~~loss~~effective ~~through~~tax ~~reinsurance~~rate ~~arrangements~~for ~~serves~~the tosix ~~mitigate~~months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we forecasted the ~~impact~~change ofin ~~large~~net realized and unrealized investment gains or losses; ~~however,~~for the ~~cost~~years ofending ~~this~~December 31, ~~protection~~2011 inand an2010, ~~individual~~respectively, ~~period~~and ~~may~~included ~~exceed~~these gains or losses in the ~~benefit~~effective tax rate calculation pursuant to ASC 740-270.

~~For~~Our GAAP combined ratio for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 decreased to 95.1% from 104.1% for the six months ended June 30, ~~our~~2010. ~~net~~The ~~combined~~loss and LAE ratio ~~was~~decreased ~~higher~~by ~~than~~11.5 ~~our~~points ~~gross~~to ~~combined~~56.1% while the expense ratio increased by 42.85 points to 39.0%. As described above, the decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to ~~the~~a ~~impact~~decrease in current accident year non-catastrophe losses, as well as catastrophe losses. The six months ended June 30, 2011 include $21.0 million or 4.0 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, as compared to $54.1 million or 6.1 points of current accident year catastrophe losses in the ~~cost~~six months ended June 30, 2010. We also experienced a number of large losses in our property ~~reinsurance~~and inland marine business within Specialty Insurance Operations and ~~facultative~~in ~~reinsurance.~~our ~~For~~non-specialty commercial lines business within Other Insurance Operations during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The six months ended June 30, ~~our~~2011 ~~net~~included ~~combined~~$15.2 ~~ratio~~million ~~was~~or ~~higher~~2.9 ~~than~~points ~~our~~of ~~gross~~favorable ~~combined~~loss ~~ratio~~reserve bydevelopment, 2as compared to $24.3 million or 2.7 points of favorable loss reserve development in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The favorable loss reserve development was primarily ~~due~~related to ~~the~~lower ~~cost~~than ofexpected ~~facultative~~severity ~~reinsurance~~on ~~and~~ non-catastrophe ~~reinsurance~~losses related to professional liability lines, ~~the~~multiple ~~impact~~peril liability lines and other general liability lines. The favorable development also included a one-time $6.5 million release of ~~which~~commercial ~~was~~and personal auto reserves associated with participation in an involuntary auto pool. The expense ratio increased primarily due to other underwriting expenses that have not decreased proportionately with the reduction in earned premium associated with the exited businesses, partially offset by ~~ceded~~a ~~large~~decrease ~~property~~in ~~losses~~policy acquisition expenses.

~~Other~~Summary ~~Insurance~~of Operations By Segment

~~Financial~~Specialty ~~results~~Insurance ~~for~~Operations ~~our~~is comprised of twelve underwriting units that are aggregated into three major underwriting units: MGA Business, Specialty Industries and Specialty Products. Other Insurance Operations ~~segment~~includes ~~for~~AutoOne, the ~~three~~non-specialty ~~months~~commercial ~~ended~~lines ~~March 31~~business and traditional personal lines business, ~~2011~~other run-off business and ~~2010~~certain ~~were~~purchase asaccounting ~~follows:~~adjustments relating to the OneBeacon Acquisition. Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations includes the investing and financing activities for OB Holdings on a consolidated basis, and certain other activities conducted by our top holding company, OneBeacon U.S. Holdings, Inc. (OBH). The prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Our segment information is presented in Note 7—“Segment Information” of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net written premiums	$	19.8		$	111.2
Earned premiums	$	21.6		$	217.3
Loss and LAE	(12.0		)	(197.2		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(1.8		)	(49.2		)
Other underwriting expenses	(6.0		)	(33.1		)
Total underwriting income (loss)	1.8			(62.2		)
Net other revenues	0.9			—
General and administrative expenses	—			(0.5		)
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	2.7		$	(62.7	)

Specialty Insurance Operations

Financial results for our Specialty Insurance Operations segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net written premiums	$	266.0		$	237.8		$	524.3		$	498.1
Earned premiums	$	246.9		$	241.2		$	488.8		$	477.1
Loss and LAE	(139.0		)	(143.1		)	(271.6		)	(279.6		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(53.5		)	(50.9		)	(102.7		)	(99.2		)
Other underwriting expenses	(42.0		)	(34.8		)	(88.4		)	(75.9		)
Total underwriting income	12.4			12.4			26.1			22.4
Net other revenues	0.1			0.6			0.2			0.8
General and administrative expenses	(0.4		)	(0.5		)	(0.9		)	(0.8		)
Pre-tax income	$	12.1		$	12.5		$	25.4		$	22.4

Table of Contents

The following table provides net written premiums, earned premiums and underwriting ratios ~~for~~by ~~Other~~major underwriting unit and Specialty Insurance Operations in total for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010:

	Three months ended March 31,
($ in millions)	MGA Business			Specialty Industries			Specialty Products			Specialty Insurance Operations
	2011		2010
Three months ended June 30, 2011
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Net written premiums	$	71.7		$	102.9		$	91.4		$	266.0
Loss and LAE	55.6	%	90.7	%
Earned premiums	68.3			83.7			94.9			246.9
Expense	36.1		37.9
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Total GAAP combined	91.7	%	128.6	%
Loss and LAE	53.3		%	50.9		%	63.2		%	56.3		%
Expense	41.6			40.4			35.1			38.7
Total GAAP combined	94.9		%	91.3		%	98.3		%	95.0		%
Three months ended June 30, 2010
Net written premiums	$	68.5		$	86.5		$	82.8		$	237.8
Earned premiums	67.2			73.8			100.2			241.2
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Loss and LAE	54.5		%	52.7		%	67.4		%	59.3		%
Expense	35.7			40.4			31.9			35.4
Total GAAP combined	90.2		%	93.1		%	99.3		%	94.7		%
Six months ended June 30, 2011
Net written premiums	$	120.2		$	188.5		$	215.6		$	524.3
Earned premiums	134.3			164.6			189.9			488.8
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Loss and LAE	49.4		%	53.9		%	61.4		%	55.6		%
Expense	41.8			41.4			35.2			39.1
Total GAAP combined	91.2		%	95.3		%	96.6		%	94.7		%
Six months ended June 30, 2010
Net written premiums	$	115.2		$	164.1		$	218.8		$	498.1
Earned premiums	130.4			146.3			200.4			477.1
Ratios:(1)(2)(3)
Loss and LAE	51.3		%	55.8		%	65.4		%	58.6		%
Expense	37.6			40.8			33.2			36.7
Total GAAP combined	88.9		%	96.6		%	98.6		%	95.3		%

(1) Includes our long-term incentive compensation expense. For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our ~~Other~~Specialty Insurance Operations combined ratio by 21.8 points and 21.62 points, respectively. For each of the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our Specialty Insurance Operations combined ratio by 1.9 points.

(2) Includes loss and LAE relating to catastrophes. For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, total calendar year incurred loss and LAE relating to catastrophes increased our ~~Other~~Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 45.65 points and 154.31 points, respectively, including development on prior accident year catastrophes which ~~increased (~~decreased) our ~~Other~~Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0 and 0.1 points, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, total calendar year incurred loss and LAE relating to catastrophes increased our Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 4.6 points and (4.3 points, respectively, including development on prior accident year catastrophes which increased our Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0.3) points and 0, respectively.

(3) Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 decreased our ~~Other~~Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 182.8 points and 3.5 points, respectively. Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 decreased our Specialty Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 1.57 points and 2.3 points, respectively.

Other Insurance Operations—Three months ended March 31, 2011 versus three months ended March 31, 2010

Net written premiums for Other Insurance Operations decreased by 82.2% to $19.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $111.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to the Personal Lines Transaction which closed in July 2010. The three months ended March 31, 2010 included $88.4 million of net written premiums related to the exited businesses. Further, net written premiums at AutoOne decreased by 19.7% to $18.3 million primarily due to actions taken to reduce our exposure in the voluntary private passenger automobile market.

The Other Insurance Operations combined ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased to 91.7% from 128.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased 35.1 points to 55.6%, while the expense ratio decreased by 1.8 points to 36.1%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was due to an 18.1 point decrease in current accident year losses as well as favorable loss reserve development. The three months ended March 31, 2011 included no current accident year catastrophe losses, compared to 15.6 points of current accident year catastrophe losses primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern United States in the three months ended March 31, 2010. In addition, current accident year non-catastrophe losses were 2.5 points lower than the prior year period which included higher-than-average levels of large losses in the non-specialty commercial businesses and in the automobile line. Also, the three months ended March 31, 2011 included 18.5 points of favorable loss reserve development, compared with 1.5 points of favorable loss reserve development in the three months ended March 31, 2010, related to the exited businesses. The decrease in the expense ratio is primarily due to a decrease in policy acquisition expenses, reflective of the decrease in our book of business resulting from the transactions, partially offset by an increase in other underwriting expenses that have not decreased proportionately with the reduction in earned premiums.

Reinsurance protection. We purchase reinsurance in order to minimize loss from large risks or catastrophic events. We also purchase individual property reinsurance coverage for certain risks to reduce large loss volatility through property-per-risk excess of loss reinsurance programs and individual risk facultative reinsurance. We also maintain excess of loss casualty reinsurance programs that provide protection for individual risk or catastrophe losses involving workers compensation, general liability, automobile liability, professional liability or umbrella liability losses. The availability and cost of reinsurance protection is subject to market conditions, which are outside of our control. Limiting our risk of loss through reinsurance arrangements serves to mitigate the impact of large losses; however, the cost of this protection in an individual period may exceed the benefit.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, our net combined ratio was higher than our gross combined ratio by 2.6 points, primarily due to the impact of the business fronted under the Commercial Lines Transaction, and to a lesser extent the cost of casualty reinsurance and catastrophe reinsurance, partially offset by losses ceded under facultative reinsurance. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our net combined ratio was higher than our gross combined ratio by 12.8 points, primarily due to the cost of catastrophe reinsurance and property reinsurance.

Table of Contents

Specialty Insurance Operations—Three months ended June 30, 2011 versus three months ended June 30, 2010

Overview. We reported a GAAP combined ratio of 95.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, essentially unchanged as compared to 94.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, with increases in the expense ratio almost entirely offset by decreases in the loss and LAE ratio. The slight increase in our combined ratio reflects higher other underwriting expenses and current accident year catastrophe losses primarily related to tornado activity in the southeastern United States in April, as well as lower favorable loss reserve development, essentially offset by lower current accident year non-catastrophe losses as the prior year period included significant large loss activity mainly related to OneBeacon Property and Inland Marine (PIM).

MGA Business. Net written premiums for MGA Business increased by 4.7% to $71.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $68.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase compared to the prior year period was primarily due to a $4.4 million increase in net written premiums from our collector cars and boats business driven by growth in new business as well as retention, partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in net written premiums from OneBeacon Entertainment (OBE) and a $0.4 million decrease in net written premiums from A.W.G. Dewar (Dewar).

The MGA Business combined ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to 94.9% from 90.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 1.2 points to 53.3%, while the expense ratio increased by 5.9 points to 41.6%. The increase in the loss and LAE ratio reflects a 3.1 point decrease in current accident year losses, partially offset by a 1.9 point change in loss reserve development as compared to the prior year period. Current accident year non-catastrophe losses were 3.2 points lower than the prior year period as the three months ended June 30, 2010 included the impact of several large losses at OBE. The three months ended June 30, 2011 includes 2.0 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to tornados in the southeastern and midwestern United States which impacted our collector cars and boats business, as compared to 1.9 points, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern and southeastern United States which impacted our collector cars and boats business, in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included 1.0 point of adverse loss reserve development, compared to 0.9 points of favorable loss reserve development primarily related to OBE. The increase in the expense ratio was driven by higher other underwriting expenses and higher policy acquisition expenses related to compensation.

Specialty Industries. Net written premiums for Specialty Industries increased by 19.0% to $102.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $86.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase compared to the prior year period was due to a $12.2 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Accident Group (OBA), a $2.3 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Energy Group (OBEG), a $1.8 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Technology Insurance (OBTI) and a $0.9 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Government Risks (OBGR), partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in net written premiums from International Marine Underwriters (IMU). The increase was primarily due to new business at OBA as well as solid retention levels despite competition in the marketplace.

The Specialty Industries combined ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to 91.3% from 93.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 1.8 points to 50.9% while the expense ratio remained flat at 40.4%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was due to the impact of favorable loss reserve development. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included 4.1 points of favorable loss reserve development primarily related to OBTI and IMU, compared to no loss reserve development in the prior year period. The impact of the favorable loss reserve development was partially offset by a 2.3 point increase in current accident year losses, compared with the three months ended June 30, 2010. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included 2.7 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to tornados in the southeastern and midwestern United States which impacted OBTI and OBGR, as compared to 2.6 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in a number of states. Within the expense ratio, a slight increase in other underwriting expenses was offset by a decrease in policy acquisition expenses.

Specialty Products. Net written premiums for Specialty Products increased by 10.4% to $91.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $82.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Professional Insurance (OBPI) primarily related to new business within the professional liability line and solid retention levels, a $1.2 million increase in net written premiums from OneBeacon Specialty Property (OBSP) and $0.8 million in net written premiums from OneBeacon Excess and Surplus (OBES) which we began writing in 2011. Net written premiums at PIM were essentially flat as compared to the prior year period, reflecting a revised underwriting strategy.

The Specialty Products combined ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to 98.3% from 99.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 4.2 points to 63.2% while the expense ratio increased by 3.2 points to 35.1%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to a 7.4 point decrease in current accident year losses, compared with the three months ended June 30, 2010. Current accident year non-catastrophe losses decreased 10.9 points. The three months ended June 30, 2010 included the impact of a number of large losses experienced at PIM. The decrease in current accident

Table of Contents

year losses was partially offset by current accident year catastrophe losses and less favorable loss reserve development. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included 10.3 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to tornados in the southeastern and midwestern United States impacting PIM and OBPI, compared to 6.8 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in a number of states at PIM. Further, the three months ended June 30, 2011 included 4.5 points of favorable loss reserve development primarily related to professional liability, compared to 7.7 points of favorable loss reserve development related to professional liability in the prior year period. The increase in the expense ratio was primarily due to an increase in other underwriting expenses, as well as a slight increase in policy acquisition expenses.

Reinsurance protection. We purchase reinsurance in order to minimize loss from large risks or catastrophic events. We also purchase individual property reinsurance coverage for certain risks to reduce large loss volatility through property-per-risk excess of loss reinsurance programs and individual risk facultative reinsurance. We also maintain excess of loss casualty reinsurance programs that provide protection for individual risk or catastrophe losses involving workers compensation, general liability, automobile liability, professional liability or umbrella liability. The availability and cost of reinsurance protection is subject to market conditions, which are outside of our control. Limiting our risk of loss through reinsurance arrangements serves to mitigate the impact of large losses; however, the cost of this protection in an individual period may exceed the benefit.

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our net combined ratio was higher than our gross combined ratio by 4.1 points, primarily due to the impact of the cost of property reinsurance and catastrophe reinsurance, and to a lesser extent the cost of facultative reinsurance and marine reinsurance. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, our net combined ratio was higher than our gross combined ratio by 3.4 points, primarily due to the cost of property reinsurance and catastrophe reinsurance, and to a lesser extent the cost of facultative reinsurance.

Specialty Insurance Operations—Six months ended June 30, 2011 versus six months ended June 30, 2010

Overview. We reported a GAAP combined ratio of 94.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 95.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, with decreases in the loss and LAE ratio partially offset by increases in the expense ratio. The decrease in our combined ratio was primarily due to lower current accident year non-catastrophe losses, as the prior year period included significant large loss activity mainly related to PIM. Current accident year catastrophe losses were unchanged from the prior year period. The decrease was partially offset by lower favorable loss reserve development and higher other underwriting expenses.

MGA Business. Net written premiums for MGA Business increased by 4.3% to $120.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $115.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase compared to the prior year period was primarily due to a $6.5 million increase in net written premiums from our collector cars and boats business driven by growth in new business as well as retention, and a $0.3 million increase in net written premiums from Dewar, partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in net written premiums from OBE.

The MGA Business combined ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to 91.2% from 88.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 1.9 points to 49.4%, while the expense ratio increased by 4.2 points to 41.8%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio reflects a decrease in current accident year catastrophe and non-catastrophe losses as compared with the prior year period. The six months ended June 30, 2011 includes 1.3 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to tornados in the southeastern and midwestern United States which impacted our collector cars and boats business, as compared to 2.5 points, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern and southeastern United States which impacted our collector cars and boats business, in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Additionally, current accident year non-catastrophe losses were 2.6 points lower than the prior year period as the six months ended June 30, 2010 included the impact of several large losses at OBE. The decrease was partially offset by a 1.9 point increase in adverse loss reserve development. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included 3.7 points of adverse loss reserve development, compared to 1.8 points of adverse loss reserve development primarily related to OBE for both periods. The increase in the expense ratio was driven by higher other underwriting expenses, as well as higher policy acquisition expenses related to compensation.

Specialty Industries. Net written premiums for Specialty Industries increased by 14.9% to $188.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $164.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase compared to the prior year period was due to a $13.3 million increase in net written premiums from OBA, a $5.9 million increase in net written premiums from OBGR, a $4.6 million increase in net written premiums from OBTI and a $3.9 million increase in net written premiums from OBEG. The increase was primarily due to new business at OBA as well as solid retention levels despite competition in the marketplace. These increases were partially offset by a $3.3 million decrease in net written premiums from IMU which reflects the competitive marketplace.

The Specialty Industries combined ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to 95.3% from 96.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 1.9 points to 53.9% while the expense ratio increased by 0.6 points

Table of Contents

to 41.4%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to the impact of favorable loss reserve development. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included 4.1 points of favorable loss reserve development primarily related to OBTI, as well as IMU and OBGR, compared to 0.6 points of adverse loss reserve development primarily related to OBTI in the prior year period. This was partially offset by a 2.8 point increase in current accident year losses, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2010. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included 4.2 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to storms and freezing weather in the northeastern and southwestern United States impacting IMU and tornados in the southeastern and midwestern United States impacting OBTI as well as OBGR and IMU, as compared to 2.7 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern United States impacting IMU. The increase in the expense ratio was due to an increase in other underwriting expenses, partially offset by a small decrease in policy acquisition expenses.

Specialty Products. Net written premiums for Specialty Products decreased by 1.5% to $215.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $218.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a $5.1 million decrease in net written premiums from PIM, reflecting a revised underwriting strategy, and a $1.0 million decrease in net written premiums from OBPI primarily related to the medical excess line, partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in net written premiums from OBSP and $1.0 million in net written premiums from OBES which we began writing in 2011.

The Specialty Products combined ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to 96.6% from 98.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The loss and LAE ratio decreased by 4.0 points to 61.4% while the expense ratio increased by 2.0 points to 35.2%. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio was primarily due to a 7.6 point decrease in current accident year losses, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2010. Current accident year non-catastrophe losses decreased 7.4 points. The six months ended June 30, 2010 included the impact of a number of large losses experienced at PIM. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included 6.4 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to tornados in the southeastern and midwestern United States as well as storms and freezing weather in the northeastern and southwestern United States impacting PIM and to a lesser extent within the financial services business of OBPI, compared to 6.6 points of current accident year catastrophe losses, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern United States experienced in the first quarter and elsewhere in the United States in the second quarter. The decrease in current accident year losses was partially offset by less favorable loss reserve development. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included 3.6 points of favorable loss reserve development primarily related to professional liability, compared to 7.2 points of favorable loss reserve development related to professional liability in the prior year period. The increase in the expense ratio was primarily due to an increase in other underwriting expenses, partially offset by a slight decrease in policy acquisition expenses.

Reinsurance protection. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our net combined ratio was higher than our gross combined ratio by 4.5 points, primarily due to the impact of the cost of property reinsurance and facultative reinsurance, and also the cost of catastrophe reinsurance and marine reinsurance. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net combined ratio was higher than our gross combined ratio by 2.9 points, primarily due to the cost of facultative reinsurance and catastrophe reinsurance.

Other Insurance Operations

Financial results for our Other Insurance Operations segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net written premiums	$	14.6		$	106.1		$	34.4		$	217.3
Earned premiums	$	18.1		$	187.1		$	39.7		$	404.4
Loss and LAE	(12.8		)	(118.8		)	(24.8		)	(316.0		)
Policy acquisition expenses	(1.9		)	(40.4		)	(3.7		)	(89.6		)
Other underwriting expenses	(5.5		)	(23.7		)	(11.5		)	(56.8		)
Total underwriting (loss) income	(2.1		)	4.2			(0.3		)	(58.0		)
Net other revenues	0.6			—			1.5			—
General and administrative expenses	—			(0.2		)	—			(0.7		)
Pre-tax (loss) income	$	(1.5	)	$	4.0		$	1.2		$	(58.7	)

Table of Contents

As Other Insurance Operations consists primarily of business in run-off, GAAP ratios are not meaningful for the 2011 periods. The following table provides underwriting ratios for Other Insurance Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

	Three months ended		Six months ended
	June 30, 2010
Ratios: (1)(2)(3)
Loss and LAE	63.5	%	78.1	%
Expense	34.2		36.2
Total GAAP combined	97.7	%	114.3	%

(1) Includes our long-term incentive compensation expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our Other Insurance Operations combined ratio by 0.5 points. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, long-term incentive compensation expense increased our Other Insurance Operations combined ratio by 1.7 points.

(2) Includes loss and LAE relating to catastrophes. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, total calendar year incurred loss and LAE relating to catastrophes increased our Other Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0.2 points, including development on prior accident year catastrophes which increased our Other Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0.3 points. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, total calendar year incurred loss and LAE relating to catastrophes increased our Other Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 8.2 points, including development on prior accident year catastrophes which decreased our Other Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 0.1 points.

(3) Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased our Other Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 5.2 points. Prior accident year development, including development on catastrophes, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased our Other Insurance Operations loss and LAE and total combined ratios by 3.3 points

Other Insurance Operations—Three months ended June 30, 2011 versus three months ended June 30, 2010

Net written premiums for Other Insurance Operations decreased by 86.2% to $14.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $106.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to the Personal Lines Transaction which closed in July 2010. The three months ended June 30, 2010 included $87.6 million of net written premiums related to the exited businesses. Further, net written premiums at AutoOne decreased by 18.9% to $15.0 million primarily due to actions taken to reduce our exposure in the voluntary private passenger automobile market.

Other Insurance Operations generated an underwriting loss of $2.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to underwriting income of $4.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Underwriting results from AutoOne were essentially unchanged from that for the prior year period. Underwriting results for the three months ended June 30, 2010 benefited from favorable loss reserve development, mainly due to lower than expected severity in commercial package business, the impact of which was partially offset by higher-than-average levels of large losses in the non-specialty commercial businesses and in the automobile line.

Other Insurance Operations—Six months ended June 30, 2011 versus six months ended June 30, 2010

Net written premiums for Other Insurance Operations decreased by 84.2% to $34.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $217.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to the Personal Lines Transaction which closed in July 2010. The six months ended June 30, 2010 included $176.0 million of net written premiums related to the exited businesses. Further, net written premiums at AutoOne decreased by 19.4% to $33.3 million primarily due to actions taken to reduce our exposure in the voluntary private passenger automobile market.

Other Insurance Operations generated an underwriting loss of $0.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $58.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in underwriting loss as compared to the prior year period reflects the impact of exiting businesses as a result of completing the Personal Lines Transaction and the Commercial Lines Transaction. The six months ended June 30, 2010 included significant catastrophe activity, primarily related to severe wind and rainstorms in the northeastern United States, and higher-than-average levels of large losses in the non-specialty commercial businesses and in the automobile line. Underwriting results from AutoOne were essentially unchanged from that for the prior year period.

Table of Contents

Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations

A summary of results from our Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations segment for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:.

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net investment income	$	1917.78		$	2825.30		$	37.5		$	53.3
Net realized and unrealized investment gains	21.9			42.4
Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses)	9.9			(14.4		)	31.8			28.0
Net other expenses	(012.21		)	(110.06		)	(12.3		)	(11.6		)
General and administrative expenses	(0.74		)	(1.21		)	(1.1		)	(2.3		)
Interest expense on debt	(6.3		)	(9.1		)
Interest expense	(6.2		)	(7.9		)	(12.5		)	(17.0		)
Pre-tax income	$	34.4		$	59.4
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	9.0		$	(9.0	)	$	43.4		$	50.4

Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations— Three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 versus three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations reported pre-tax income of $349.40 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to a pre-tax ~~income~~loss of $599.4 0 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily ~~related~~due to ~~decreases~~an increase in net ~~investment income and net~~ realized and unrealized investment gains. As(losses), ~~further~~partially ~~described~~offset ~~below,~~by a decrease in net investment income. Net realized and unrealized investment gains ~~decreased~~(losses) increased to $219.9 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to $42(14.4) million in the prior year period, ~~and~~while net investment income decreased to $1917.7 8 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to $2825.30 million in the prior year period. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Summary of Investment Results”. The decrease in interest expense reflects actions taken to reduce outstanding debt. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financing”. ~~Further,~~Net ~~net~~ other expenses ~~decreased~~increased ~~mainly~~ due to a $12.0 million loss related to the purchase of a portion of our senior notes in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to a $10.53 million loss related to the purchase of a portion of our senior notes in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations— Six months ended June 30, 2011 versus six months ended June 30, 2010

Investing, Financing and Corporate Operations reported pre-tax income of $43.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to pre-tax income of $50.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily related to a decrease in net investment income and an increase in net other expenses. Net investment income decreased to $37.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $53.3 million in the prior year period. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Summary of Investment Results”. Net other expenses increased due to a $12.0 million loss related to the purchase of a portion of our senior notes in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to a $10.8 million loss related to the purchase of a portion of our senior notes in the six months ended June 30, 2010. These were partially offset by an increase in net realized and unrealized investment gains and a decrease in interest expense. Net realized and unrealized investment gains increased to $31.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $28.0 million in the prior year period. The decrease in interest expense reflects actions taken to reduce outstanding debt. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financing”.

Summary of Investment Results

Investment Philosophy

Our long-term investment philosophy has historically been to maximize our after tax total risk-adjusted return while taking prudent levels of risk and maintaining a diversified portfolio. Under this approach, each dollar of after tax investment income and realized and unrealized gains and losses is valued equally.

Our investment portfolio mix as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 consisted in large part of high quality, fixed maturity investments and short-term investments, as well as a smaller allocation to equity investments which are comprised of common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments such as hedge funds and private equity funds. Our management believes that prudent levels of investments in common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments within our investment portfolio are likely to enhance long-term after tax total returns without significantly increasing the risk profile of the portfolio.

Table of Contents

Our overall fixed maturity investment strategy is to purchase securities that are attractively priced in relation to their investment risks. We also generally manage the interest rate risk associated with holding fixed maturity investments by actively maintaining the average duration of the portfolio to achieve an adequate after tax total return without subjecting the portfolio to an unreasonable level of interest rate risk.

Our equity investment strategy is to maximize absolute risk-adjusted return through investments in a variety of common equity, equity-related and convertible bond instruments, as well as other investments, primarily hedge funds and private equity funds. We invest in relatively concentrated positions in the United States and other developed markets. Our philosophy is to invest for total risk-adjusted return using a bottom-up, value investing approach. Preservation of capital is of the utmost importance.

Table of Contents

Investment Returns

A summary of our consolidated pre-tax investment results for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	($ in millions)
Net investment income	$	1917.78		$	2825.30		$	37.5		$	53.3
Net realized investment gains	21.2			26.4
Net realized investment gains (losses)	16.5			12.8			37.7			39.2
Change in net unrealized investment gains and losses	0(6.76		)	16(27.02		)	(5.9		)	(11.2		)
Total GAAP pre-tax investment results	$	4127.67		$	7010.76		$	69.3		$	81.3

Gross investment returns versus typical benchmarks for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

	As of March 31, (1)
	Three months ended June 30, (1)				Six months ended June 30, (1)
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Fixed maturity investments	1.24	%	21.02	%	2.6	%	3.2	%
Short-term investments	—0.1		—0.0		0.1		(0.1	)
Total fixed income	1.14		10.59		2.5		2.4
Barclays U.S. Intermediate Aggregate Index	02.52		12.89		2.7		4.8
Common equity securities	3.3		3.8
Common stock	(1.0	)	(3.9	)	2.3		(0.5	)
Convertible bonds	1(2.75	)	4(1.48	)	(0.6	)	3.2
Total common equity securities and convertible bonds	2.9		4.1
Total common stock and convertible bonds	(1.3	)	(3.1	)	1.6		1.0
Other investments	32.83		2(1.76	)	6.2		0.9
Total common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments	3.2		3.7
Total common stock, convertible bonds and other investments	(0.2	)	(2.6	)	3.0		1.0
S&P 500 Index (total return)	50.91		5(11.4	)	6.0		(6.7	)
Total consolidated portfolio	1.51	%	10.83	%	2.6	%	2.2	%

(1) Gross investment income returns exclude investment expenses of $1.7 million and $2.34 million, respectively, for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, and $3.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Investment Returns—Three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 versus three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

Overview

Our total pre-tax investment results were $4127.6 7 million, a return of 1.51% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to $7010.76 million, a return of 10.83% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Net investment income in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 was $1917.78 million, a decrease of $87.62 million, compared to $2825.3 0 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to ~~fixed~~a ~~maturity~~reduction ~~investment~~in ~~yields~~invested ~~which~~assets ~~decreased to 0.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2011~~ as ~~compared~~a toresult ~~1.1%~~of ~~for~~ the ~~three~~Personal ~~months~~Lines ~~ended~~Transaction ~~March 31, 2010~~ and arepurchases ~~reduction~~of indebt ~~invested assets~~ to $2,~~915~~665.82 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 from $3,~~920~~733.03 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~primarily~~prior asto athe ~~result~~reclassification of assets being sold as part of the Personal Lines Transaction. Net realized investment gains (losses) were $2116.25 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, aan ~~decrease~~increase of $53.27 million compared to $2612.48 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The ~~three months ended March 31, 2010 included $24.4 million of realized gains on the sales of fixed maturity securities in preparation of the close of the Personal Lines Transaction. The~~ change in net unrealized investment gains and losses was ana ~~increase~~decrease of $06.76 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to ana ~~increase~~decrease of $1627.02 million in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

~~Fixed income~~40

Our fixed income portfolio, which includes fixed maturity and short-term investments, returned 1.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to 1.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. We recorded $10.6 million in net realized gains in the three months ended March 31, 2011. We maintained a high quality fixed maturity portfolio with a relatively short duration of approximately 2.8 years excluding short term investments and approximately 2.6 years including short-term investments at March 31, 2011. Our fixed maturity portfolio performed consistently with its characteristics and above the Barclays U.S. Intermediate Aggregate Index benchmark for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and slightly below for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

Fixed income

Our fixed income portfolio, which includes fixed maturity and short-term investments, returned 1.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 0.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. We maintained a high quality fixed maturity portfolio with a relatively short duration of approximately 2.7 years excluding short-term investments and approximately 2.5 years including short-term investments at June 30, 2011. Our fixed income portfolio performed consistently with its characteristics and below the Barclays U.S. Intermediate Aggregate Index benchmark for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments

Our total common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments portfolio returned 3(0.2)% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to 3(2.76)% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Our total common equity securities and convertible bonds portfolio returned 2(1.93)% and 4(3.1)% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010, respectively, or ~~300~~140 basis points worse and ~~130~~ 830 basis points ~~worse~~better, respectively, than the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500) benchmark. ~~We recorded $5.8 million in net realized gains in the three months ended March 31, 2011.~~ Our other investments portfolio returned 32.83% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, compared to 2(1.76)% for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

Investment Returns—Six months ended June 30, 2011 versus six months ended June 30, 2010

Overview

Our total pre-tax investment results were $69.3 million, a return of 2.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $81.3 million, a return of 2.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Net investment income in the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $37.5 million, a decrease of $15.8 million, compared to $53.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in invested assets as a result of the Personal Lines Transaction and repurchases of debt to $2,665.2 million as of June 30, 2011 from $3,733.3 million as of June 30, 2010, prior to the reclassification of assets being sold as part of the Personal Lines Transaction. Net realized investment gains (losses) were $37.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $1.5 million compared to $39.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The change in net unrealized investment gains and losses was a decrease of $5.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to a decrease of $11.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Fixed income

Our fixed income portfolio, which includes fixed maturity and short-term investments, returned 2.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 2.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. We maintained a high quality fixed maturity portfolio with a relatively short duration of approximately 2.7 years excluding short-term investments and approximately 2.5 years including short-term investments at June 30, 2011. Our fixed income portfolio performed consistently with its characteristics and slightly below the Barclays U.S. Intermediate Aggregate Index benchmark for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments

Our total common equity securities, convertible bonds and other investments portfolio returned 3.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 1.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our total common equity securities and convertible bonds portfolio returned 1.6% and 1.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, or 440 basis points worse and 770 basis points better, respectively, than the S&P 500 benchmark. Our other investments portfolio returned 6.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 0.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Fair Value Considerations

We record our investments in accordance with ASC 820 which provides a revised definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands financial statement disclosure requirements for fair value information. Under ASC 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between inputs based on market data from independent sources (observable inputs) and a reporting entity’s internal assumptions based upon the best information available when external market data is limited or unavailable (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy in ASC 820 prioritizes fair value measurements into three levels based on the nature of the inputs. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities have the highest priority (Level 1), followed by observable inputs other than quoted prices, including prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities (Level 2), and unobservable inputs, including the reporting entity’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use, having the lowest priority (Level 3).

Table of Contents

We use brokers and outside pricing services to assist in determining fair values. For investments in active markets, we use the quoted market prices provided by the outside pricing services to determine fair value. The outside pricing services we use have indicated that they will only provide prices where observable inputs are available. In circumstances where quoted market prices are unavailable, we utilize fair value estimates based upon other observable inputs including matrix pricing, benchmark interest rates, market comparables and other relevant inputs. In circumstances where observable inputs are adjusted to reflect management’s best estimate of fair value, such fair value measurements are considered a lower level measurement in the fair value hierarchy.

Our process to validate the market prices obtained from the outside pricing sources includes, but is not limited to, periodic evaluation of model pricing methodologies and analytical reviews of certain prices. We also periodically perform back-testing of selected purchases and sales activity to determine whether there are any significant differences between the market price used to value the security prior to the purchase or sale and the actual purchase or sale price.

Other investments, which are comprised primarily of hedge funds and private equity funds for which the fair value option has been elected, are carried at fair value based upon our proportionate interest in the underlying fund’s net asset value, which is deemed to approximate fair value. The fair value of our investments in hedge funds and private equity funds has been estimated using net asset value because it reflects the fair value of the funds’ underlying investments in accordance with ASC 820. We employ a number of procedures to assess the reasonableness of the fair value measurements, including obtaining and reviewing each fund’s audited financial statements and discussing each fund’s pricing with the fund’s manager. However, since the fund managers do not provide sufficient information to independently evaluate the pricing inputs and methods for each underlying investment, the inputs are considered to be unobservable. Accordingly, the fair values of our investment in hedge funds and private equity funds have been classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy.

In circumstances where the underlying investments are publicly traded, such as the investments made by hedge funds, the fair value of the underlying investments is determined using current market prices. In circumstances where the underlying investments are not publicly traded, such as the investments made by private equity funds, the private equity fund managers have considered the need for a liquidity discount on each of the underlying investments when determining the fund’s net asset value in accordance with ASC 820. In circumstances where our portion of a fund’s net asset value is deemed to differ from fair value due to illiquidity or other factors associated with our investment in the fund, including counterparty credit risk, the net asset value is adjusted accordingly. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not record an adjustment to the net asset value related to our investments in hedge funds or private equity funds.

As of both ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other investments represented approximately 5% of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value. Other investments accounted for at fair value as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were comprised of $5453.06 million and $63.4 million, respectively, in hedge funds, $7368.39 million and $72.7 million, respectively, in private equity funds and $14.1 million for both periods of an investment in a community reinvestment vehicle. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we held investments in 9 and 10 hedge funds, respectively, and 14 and 15 private equity funds, respectively. The largest investment in a single fund was $2317.12 million and $24.6 million, respectively, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

37As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, other investments also included $21.7 million and $21.2 million, respectively, of an investment in a tax advantaged federal affordable housing development fund which is accounted for using the equity method.

As of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 90% of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value was priced based upon observable inputs. Investments valued using Level 1 inputs include fixed maturities, primarily investments in U.S. Treasuries, common equities and short-term investments, which include U.S. Treasury Bills. Investments valued using Level 2 inputs comprise fixed maturities including corporate debt, state and other governmental debt, convertible fixed maturity securities and mortgage and asset-backed securities. Fair value estimates for investments that trade infrequently and have few or no observable market prices are classified as Level 3 measurements. Level 3 fair value estimates based upon unobservable inputs include our investments in hedge funds and private equity funds, as well as investments in debt and equity securities, including certain asset-backed securities, where quoted market prices are unavailable.

Table of Contents

AsThe offair ~~March~~value measurements at June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~other~~for ~~investments~~assets ~~also~~recorded ~~included $21.6 million and $21.2 million, respectively, of an investment~~ in aaccordance ~~tax~~with ~~advantaged~~ASC ~~federal~~825 ~~affordable~~and ~~housing~~any ~~development~~related ~~fund~~Level 3 ~~which~~inputs isare ~~accounted~~as ~~for using the equity method.~~follows:

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 91% and 90%, respectively, of the investment portfolio recorded at fair value was priced based upon observable inputs. Investments valued using Level 1 inputs include fixed maturities, primarily investments in U.S. Treasuries, common equities and short-term investments, which include U.S. Treasury Bills. Investments valued using Level 2 inputs comprise fixed maturities including corporate debt, state and other governmental debt, convertible fixed maturity securities and mortgage and asset-backed securities. Fair value estimates for investments that trade infrequently and have few or no observable market prices are classified as Level 3 measurements. Level 3 fair value estimates based upon unobservable inputs include our investments in hedge funds and private equity funds, as well as investments in debt and equity securities, including certain asset-backed securities, where quoted market prices are unavailable.

	Fair value at June 30, 2011		Level 3 Inputs		Level 3 Percentage
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	222.1	$	—	—	%
Debt securities issued by industrial corporations	749.6		—		—
Municipal obligations	2.0		—		—
Asset-backed securities	977.8		22.0		2.2
Foreign government obligations	8.4		—		—
Preferred stocks	83.0		70.3		84.7
Fixed maturity investments	2,042.9		92.3		4.5
Short-term investments	97.2		—		—
Common equity securities	291.6		42.3		14.5
Convertible bonds	75.2		—		—
Other investments(1)	136.6		136.6		100.0
Total(1)	$	2,643.5	$	271.2	10.3	%

The fair value measurements at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 for assets recorded in accordance with ASC 825 and any related Level 3 inputs are as follows:

	Fair value at March 31, 2011		Level 3 Inputs		Level 3 Percentage
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	255.2	$	—	—	%
Debt securities issued by industrial corporations	837.5		0.3		—
Municipal obligations	2.0		—		—
Asset-backed securities	966.8		—		—
Foreign government obligations	8.3		—		—
Preferred stocks	85.8		73.2		85.3
Fixed maturity investments	2,155.6		73.5		3.4
Short-term investments	213.7		—		—
Common equity securities	296.5		42.0		14.2
Convertible bonds	87.0		—		—
Other investments(1)	141.4		141.4		100.0
Total	$	2,894.2	$	256.9	8.9	%

	Fair value at December 31, 2010	Level 3 Inputs	Level 3 Percentage
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturity investments:

Filing Compare · OneBeacon U.S. Holdings, Inc.