UNITED STATES ~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 33-167793-02

SL GREEN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

13-3960938

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10170

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 594-2700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x ~~Smaller Reporting Company o~~ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

As of ~~April~~July 3031, ~~2012~~2013, ~~910~~879,~~546~~183 common units of limited partnership interest of the Registrant were held by non-affiliates of the Registrant. There is no established trading market for such units.

Table of Contents

SL GREEN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

INDEX

		PAGE
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statement of Capital for the three months ended March 31, 2013 (unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statement of Capital for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	7
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	8
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	38
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	5356
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	5356
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	5457
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	5457
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	5457
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	5457
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	5457
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	5457
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	5457
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	5558
SIGNATURES		5659

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(~~Amounts~~ in thousands, except per unit data)

	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Commercial real estate properties, at cost:
Land and land interests	$	2,~~886~~866,~~099~~048		$	2,886,099
Building and improvements	7,~~452~~393,~~347~~930			7,389,766
Building leasehold and improvements	1,~~346~~352,~~481~~953			1,346,748
Properties under capital lease	4750,~~179~~332			40,340
	11,732,106			11,662,953
	11,663,263			11,662,953
Less: accumulated depreciation	(1,~~461~~502,~~775~~694		)	(1,393,323		)
	10,270,331			10,269,630
	10,160,569			10,269,630
Assets held for sale	—207,665			4,901
Cash and cash equivalents	~~220~~198,~~104~~969			189,984
Restricted cash	130,~~233~~483			136,071
Investment in marketable securities	2226,~~994~~266			21,429
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance of $20,947 and $21,652 in 2013 and 2012, respectively	41,950			48,544
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance of $20,466 and $21,652 in 2013 and 2012, respectively	51,646			48,544
Related party receivables	116,~~169~~845			7,531
Deferred rents receivable, net of allowance of $28,475 and $29,580 in 2013 and 2012, respectively	355,250			340,747
Deferred rents receivable, net of allowance of $29,821 and $29,580 in 2013 and 2012, respectively	360,954			340,747
Debt and preferred equity investments, net of discount of $11,251 and $13,572 and allowance of $7,000 both in 2013 and 2012, respectively	1,443,834			1,357,203
Debt and preferred equity investments, net of discounts and deferred origination fees of $27,107 and $22,341 and allowance of $7,000 both in 2013 and 2012, respectively	1,227,421			1,348,434
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures	1,~~073~~085,~~130~~793			1,032,243
Deferred costs, net	~~252~~246,~~018~~058			261,145
Other assets	~~722~~699,~~952~~256			718,326
Total assets	$	14,~~543~~401,~~965~~925		$	14,~~387~~378,~~754~~985
Liabilities
Mortgages and other loans payable	$	4,~~815~~835,~~485~~231		$	4,615,464
Revolving credit facility	3040,000			70,000
Term loan and senior unsecured notes	1,~~732~~735,~~588~~205			1,734,956
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities	7372,~~666~~415			73,769
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~143~~138,~~812~~029			159,598
Deferred revenue	~~322~~296,~~317~~930			~~321~~312,~~764~~995
Capitalized lease obligations	4347,~~404~~240			37,518
Deferred land leases payable	19,~~750~~948			20,897
Dividend and distributions payable	3734,~~737~~740			37,839
Security deposits	4953,~~803~~604			46,253
Liabilities related to assets held for sale	—11,894			136
Junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures held by trusts that issued trust preferred securities	100,000			100,000
Total liabilities	7,~~368~~385,~~562~~236			7,~~218~~209,~~194~~425
Commitments and contingencies	—			—
Series G preferred units, $25.00 liquidation preference, 1,902 issued and outstanding at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	47,550			47,550
Series G Preferred Units, $25.00 liquidation preference, 1,902 issued and outstanding at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	47,550			47,550
Series H preferred units, $25.00 liquidation preference, 80 issued and outstanding at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	2,000			2,000
Series H Preferred Units, $25.00 liquidation preference, 80 issued and outstanding at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	2,000			2,000
Capital
SLGOP partners’ capital:
Series C preferred units, 7,700 outstanding at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	180,340			180,340
Series C Preferred Units, 7,700 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012	—			180,340
Series I preferred units, 9,200 outstanding at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	221,932			221,965
Series I Preferred Units, 9,200 issued and outstanding at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012,	221,932			221,965
SL Green partners’ capital (941 and 940 general partner common units and 90,614 and 90,310 limited partner common units outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)	6,207,552			6,189,529
SL Green partners’ capital (946 and 940 general partner common units and 90,867 and 90,310 limited partner common units outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)	6,210,022			6,189,529
Limited partner interests in SLGOP (2,586 and 2,760 limited partner common units outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	54,716			71,524
Limited partner interests in SLGOP (2,794 and 2,760 limited partner common units outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	65,936			71,524
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2719,~~120~~169		)	(30,649		)
Total SLGOP partners’ capital	6,~~637~~478,~~420~~721			6,632,709
Noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	488,~~433~~418			487,301
Total capital	76,~~125~~967,~~853~~139			7,120,010
Total liabilities and capital	$	14,~~543~~401,~~965~~925		$	14,~~387~~378,~~754~~985

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(~~Unaudited~~unaudited, ~~and amounts~~ in thousands, except per unit data)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	2013			2012
	June 30,						June 30,
Revenues
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Rental revenue, net	$	270,489		$	260,762
Revenues
Escalation and reimbursement	41,000			41,656
Rental revenue, net	$	273,307		$	263,838		$	539,755		$	520,595
Investment and preferred equity income	52,708			26,338
Escalation and reimbursement	39,381			40,967			79,926			82,080
Other income	5,774			10,377
Investment and preferred equity income	46,731			33,448			99,439			59,786
Total revenues	369,971			339,133
Other income	5,726			6,282			11,493			16,659
Expenses
Total revenues	365,145			344,535			730,613			679,120
Operating expenses, including approximately $4,150 (2013) and $3,471 (2012) paid to related parties	73,633			73,254
Expenses
Real estate taxes	53,688			51,480
Operating expenses, including approximately $4,319 and $8,469 (2013) and $4,773 and $8,244 (2012) paid to related parties	69,432			67,434			141,630			139,319
Ground rent	10,990			8,806
Real estate taxes	52,710			52,256			106,114			103,453
Interest expense, net of interest income	81,336			80,137
Ground rent	8,649			8,890			19,640			17,696
Amortization of deferred financing costs	4,463			3,580
Interest expense, net of interest income	83,276			82,159			164,447			162,130
Depreciation and amortization	80,683			77,069
Amortization of deferred financing costs	4,240			3,553			8,703			7,133
Loan loss and other investment reserves, net of recoveries	—			564
Depreciation and amortization	82,020			76,207			161,114			151,739
Transaction related costs	1,358			1,056
Loan loss and other investment reserves, net of recoveries	—			—			—			564
Marketing, general and administrative	21,067			20,196
Transaction related costs	1,711			1,970			3,068			3,026
Total expenses	327,218			316,142
Marketing, general and administrative	21,514			20,721			42,582			40,917
Income from continuing operations before equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate, noncontrolling interests and discontinued operations	42,753			22,991
Total expenses	323,552			313,190			647,298			625,977
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures	5,073			(1,560		)
Income from continuing operations before equity in net (loss) income from unconsolidated joint ventures, equity in net (loss) gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate, loss on sale of investment in marketable securities, purchase price fair value adjustment, depreciable real estate reserves, net of recoveries, and loss on early extinguishment of debt	41,593			31,345			83,315			53,143
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	—			7,260
Equity in net (loss) income from unconsolidated joint ventures	(3,761		)	70,890			1,313			69,330
Loss on sale of investment in marketable securities	(57		)	—
Equity in net (loss) gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	(3,583		)	9,534			(3,583		)	16,794
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(18,513		)	—
Loss on sale of investment in marketable securities	(8		)	—			(65		)	—
Income from continuing operations	29,256			28,691
Purchase price fair value adjustment	(2,305		)	—			(2,305		)	—
Net loss from discontinued operations	(32		)	(161		)
Depreciable real estate reserves, net of recoveries	—			5,789			—			5,789
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	1,113			6,627
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(10		)	—			(18,523		)	—
Net income	30,337			35,157
Income from continuing operations	31,926			117,558			60,152			145,056
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(2,901		)	(1,071		)
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	(678		)	899			320			1,931
Preferred unit distributions	(565		)	(397		)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			—			1,113			6,627
Net income attributable to SLGOP	26,871			33,689
Net income	31,248			118,457			61,585			153,614
Perpetual preferred unit distributions	(7,407		)	(7,545		)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(3,004		)	(3,887		)	(5,905		)	(4,958		)
Net income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	19,464		$	26,144
Preferred unit distributions	(565		)	(565		)	(1,130		)	(962		)
Amounts attributable to SLGOP common unitholders:
Net income attributable to SLGOP	27,679			114,005			54,550			147,694
Income from continuing operations	$	18,383		$	12,418
Preferred unit redemption costs	(12,160		)	—			(12,160		)	—
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	—			7,260
Perpetual preferred unit distributions	(6,999		)	(7,544		)	(14,406		)	(15,089		)
Net loss from discontinued operations	(32		)	(161		)
Net income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	8,520		$	106,461		$	27,984		$	132,605
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	1,113			6,627
Amounts attributable to SLGOP common unitholders:
Net income	$	19,464		$	26,144
Income from continuing operations	$	15,086		$	96,028		$	32,439		$	107,253
Basic earnings per unit:
Purchase price fair value adjustment	(2,305		)	—			(2,305		)	—
Net income from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.20		$	0.14
Equity in net (loss) gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	(3,583		)	9,534			(3,583		)	16,794
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	—			0.08
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	(678		)	899			320			1,931
Net loss from discontinued operations	—			—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			—			1,113			6,627
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	0.01			0.07
Net income	$	8,520		$	106,461		$	27,984		$	132,605
Net income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	0.21		$	0.29
Basic earnings per unit:
Diluted earnings per unit:
Net income from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.14		$	1.04		$	0.32		$	1.18
Net income from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.20		$	0.14
Equity in net (loss) gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	(0.04		)	0.10			(0.03		)	0.18
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	—			0.08
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	(0.01		)	0.01			—			0.02
Net loss from discontinued operations	—			—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			—			0.01			0.07
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	0.01			0.07
Net income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	0.09		$	1.15		$	0.30		$	1.45
Net income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	0.21		$	0.29
Diluted earnings per unit:
Dividends per unit	$	0.33		$	0.25
Net income from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.14		$	1.03		$	0.32		$	1.18
Basic weighted average common unit outstanding	94,086			89,793
Equity in net (loss) gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	(0.04		)	0.10			(0.03		)	0.18
Diluted weighted average common units and common units equivalents outstanding	94,302			90,173
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	(0.01		)	0.01			—			0.02
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			—			0.01			0.07
Net income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	0.09		$	1.14		$	0.30		$	1.45
Dividends per unit	$	0.33		$	0.25		$	0.66		$	0.50
Basic weighted average common units outstanding	94,312			92,982			94,224			91,386
Diluted weighted average common units and common unit equivalents outstanding	94,536			93,351			94,452			91,766

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(~~Unaudited~~unaudited, ~~and amounts~~ in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	2013			2012
	June 30,						June 30,
Net income	$	30,337		$	35,157
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Other comprehensive income:
Net income	$	31,248		$	118,457		$	61,585		$	153,614
Net unrealized loss on derivative instruments	(41		)	(146		)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cashflow hedges into interest expense	468			460
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments	181			(477		)	140			(623		)
SLGOP’s share of joint venture net unrealized gain on derivative instruments	221			58
Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cashflow hedges into interest expense	470			466			938			926
Reclassification of SLGOP’s share of joint venture net realized loss on derivatives designated as cashflow hedges into equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	1,240			2,743
SLGOP’s share of joint venture net unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments	7,888			(6,388		)	8,109			(6,330		)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities	1,641			770
Reclassification of SLGOP’s share of joint venture net realized loss on derivatives designated as cashflow hedges into equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	1,260			2,751			2,500			5,494
Other comprehensive income	3,529			3,885
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities	(1,848		)	(542		)	(207		)	228
Comprehensive income	33,866			39,042
Other comprehensive income (loss)	7,951			(4,190		)	11,480			(305		)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(2,901		)	(1,071		)
Comprehensive income	39,199			114,267			73,065			153,309
Comprehensive income attributable to SLGOP	$	30,965		$	37,971
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(3,004		)	(3,887		)	(5,905		)	(4,958		)
Comprehensive income attributable to SLGOP	$	36,195		$	110,380		$	67,160		$	148,351

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statement of Capital

(~~Unaudited~~unaudited, ~~and amounts~~ in thousands, except per unit data)

	SL Green Operating Partnership Unitholders
																Accumulated
	Series C			Series I			General Partner				Limited Partners					Accumulated Other
	Series C			Series I			General Partner				Limited Partners					Other
	Preferred Units			Preferred Units			Common Units	Common Unitholders			Common Units		Common Unitholders			Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	180,340		$	221,965		91,250	$	6,189,529		2,760		$	71,524		$	(30,649	)	$	487,301		$	7,120,010
Net income	36,~~670~~932			37,~~737~~474				1839,~~909~~345					~~555~~799						25,~~901~~905			2960,~~772~~455
Other comprehensive income																311,~~529~~480						311,~~529~~480
Preferred distributions	(36,~~670~~932		)	(37,~~737~~474		)																(714,~~407~~406		)
DRIP proceeds							—	1326														1326
Redemption of units							224	17,287			(224	)	(17,287		)							—
Conversion of units							224	17,287			(224	)	(17,287		)							—
Issuance of units											50258		~~777~~12,675									~~777~~12,675
Amortization of deferred compensation plan							24	713,~~822~~324														713,~~822~~324
Redemption of preferred units	(180,340		)					(12,160		)												(192,500		)
Preferred units issuance costs				(33		)																(33		)
Common units issuance costs							—	(24		)												(24		)
Contributions - net proceeds from common stock offering							95	8,511														8,511
Contributions - proceeds from stock options exercised							79	4,533														4,533
Contributions - treasury shares							83	6,090														6,090
Contributions to consolidated joint venture																			3,110			3,110
Contributions - proceeds from stock options exercised							157	8,969														8,969
Distributions to noncontrolling interests																			(4,879		)	(4,879		)
Contributions to consolidated joint venture																			3,364			3,364
Cash distribution declared ($0.33 per common unit, none of which represented a return of capital for federal income tax purposes)								(30,517		)			(853		)							(31,370		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests																			(8,152		)	(8,152		)
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	180,340		$	221,932		91,555	$	6,207,552		2,586		$	54,716		$	(27,120	)	$	488,433		$	7,125,853
Cash distribution declared ($0.66 per common unit, none of which represented a return of capital for federal income tax purposes)								(60,899		)			(1,775		)							(62,674		)
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	—		$	221,932		91,813	$	6,210,022		2,794		$	65,936		$	(19,169	)	$	488,418		$	6,967,139

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(~~Unaudited~~unaudited, ~~and amounts~~ in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31
	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Operating Activities
Net income	$	3061,~~337~~585		$	35153,~~157~~614
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	85173,~~146~~028			80162,~~663~~028
Equity in net (income) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures	(5,073		)	1,560
Depreciable real estate reserves, net of recoveries	2,150			(5,789		)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	6,901			4,408
Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	(1,313		)	(69,330		)
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture interest/real estate	—			(7,260		)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	13,467			77,981
Purchase price fair value adjustment	2,305			—
Equity in net loss (gain) on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	3,583			(16,794		)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	(1,113		)	(6,627		)
Loan loss and other investment reserves, net of recoveries	—			564
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	1810,~~513~~968			—
Deferred rents receivable	(1329,~~923~~452		)	(2137,~~123~~318		)
Other non-cash adjustments	(2228,~~115~~375		)	53,~~554~~759
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash — operations	56,~~447~~127			(127,~~771~~104		)
Tenant and other receivables	74,~~409~~896			14(5,006		)
Related party receivables	~~(3,638~~768		)	(3,~~664~~792		)
Deferred lease costs	(419,~~646~~106		)	(728,~~152~~549		)
Other assets	~~(21~~4,~~185~~075		)	(2427,~~230~~176		)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	~~869~~1,793			49,~~118~~609
Deferred revenue and land leases payable	198,~~596~~102			7(2,~~620~~135		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	~~102~~213,~~525~~488			56197,~~831~~935
Investing Activities
Acquisitions of real estate property	(4852,~~500~~534		)	(~~145~~248,~~558~~468		)
Additions to land, buildings and improvements	(1161,~~617~~531		)	(3276,~~561~~585		)
Escrowed cash — capital improvements/acquisition deposits	~~191~~(394		)	(165,~~533~~030		)
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures	(4981,~~996~~913		)	(~~105~~131,~~633~~820		)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	511,~~333~~117			1644,~~652~~172
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate/joint venture interest	5,852			2326,~~088~~099
Other investments	(1018,~~146~~038		)	(4031,~~016~~206		)
Debt and preferred equity and other investments, net of repayments/participations	~~(65~~150,~~607~~919		)	(875,~~631~~209		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(~~174~~46,~~490~~522		)	(~~294~~558,~~192~~047		)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from mortgages and other loans payable	980,333			~~108~~1,113,500
Repayments of mortgages and other loans payable	(~~787~~833,~~887~~728		)	(13472,~~526~~288		)
Proceeds from credit facility and senior unsecured notes	~~155~~370,000			~~300~~468,~~000~~339
Repayments of credit facility and senior unsecured notes	(~~199~~404,~~960~~970		)	(~~352~~840,~~454~~793		)
Contributions of proceeds from stock options exercised and DRIP issuance	48,~~546~~995			~~102~~105,~~089~~195
Contributions of net proceeds from sale of common stock/preferred stock	~~(57~~8,478		)	~~122~~201,~~953~~307
Redemption of preferred units	(192,500		)	—
Purchases of treasury stock	—			(11,158		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(48,~~879~~152		)	(711,~~117~~999		)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	3,~~110~~364			18,~~331~~799
Distributions paid on common and preferred units	(3981,~~444~~309		)	(2960,~~215~~716		)
Deferred loan costs and capitalized lease obligations	(8,~~677~~492		)	(531,~~569~~467		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	102,085			232,834
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(157,981		)	478,719
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	30,120			(4,527		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	8,985			118,607
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	189,984			138,192
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~220~~198,~~104~~969		$	~~133~~256,~~665~~799

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(Unaudited)~~June 30, 2013

~~March 31, 2013~~(unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

SL Green Realty Corp., which is referred to as the Company or SL Green, a Maryland corporation, and SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P., which is referred to as SLGOP or the Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, were formed in June 1997 for the purpose of combining the commercial real estate business of S.L. Green Properties, Inc. and its affiliated partnerships and entities. The Operating Partnership received a contribution of interest in the real estate properties, as well as 95% of the economic interest in the management, leasing and construction companies, which are referred to as the Service Corporation, a consolidated variable interest entity. All of the management, leasing and construction services with respect to the properties which are wholly-owned by us are conducted through SL Green Management LLC which is 100% owned by us. The Company has qualified, and expects to qualify in the current fiscal year, as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and operates as a self-administered, self-managed REIT. A REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate interests and, through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to minimize the payment of Federal income taxes at the corporate level. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to “we,” “our” and “us” means SLGOP and all entities owned or controlled by SLGOP.

Substantially all of SL Green’s assets are held by, and its operations are conducted through, the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole managing general partner of the Operating Partnership. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, noncontrolling investors held, in the aggregate, a 2.7595% common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. We refer to these interests as the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership. See Note 12, “Capital.”

Reckson Associates Realty Corp., or Reckson, and Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., or ROP, are our wholly-owned subsidiaries.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, we owned the following interests in commercial office properties in the New York Metropolitan area, primarily in midtown Manhattan, a borough of New York City. Our investments in the New York Metropolitan area also include investments in Brooklyn, Long Island, Westchester County, Connecticut and Northern New Jersey, which are collectively known as the Suburban assets:

Location	Ownership	Number of Properties	Square Feet	Weighted Average Occupancy(1)
Manhattan	Consolidated properties	27	18,347,945	93.89	%
	Unconsolidated properties	9	5,934,434	95.31	%
Suburban	Consolidated properties	2627	34,~~899~~217,~~800~~400	7879.4	%
	Unconsolidated properties	54	1,~~539~~222,~~700~~100	84.73	%
		67	29,721,879	91.67	%

(1) The weighted average occupancy represents the total leased square feet divided by total available rentable square feet.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, we also owned investments in 14 stand-alone retail properties encompassing approximately 465,~~207~~200 square feet, 15 development properties encompassing approximately 2,580,~~691~~700 square feet, three residential properties encompassing 468 units (approximately 497,~~093~~100 square feet), two land interests encompassing approximately 961,400 square feet and 3130 west coast office properties encompassing approximately 4,~~473~~066,~~603~~900 square feet. In addition, we manage two office properties owned by third parties and affiliated companies encompassing approximately 626,~~415~~400 rentable square feet. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, we also held debt and preferred equity investments with a book value of $1.42 billion.

Partnership Agreement

In accordance with our partnership agreement, or the Operating Partnership agreement, we allocate all distributions and profits and losses in proportion to the percentage ownership interests of the respective partners. As our managing general partner, SL Green is required to take such reasonable efforts, as determined by it in its sole discretion, to cause us to distribute sufficient amounts to enable the payment of sufficient dividends by the Company to minimize any Federal income or excise tax at the Company level. Under the Operating Partnership agreement, each limited partner has the right to cause us to redeem units of limited partnership interests for cash, or if the Company so elects, shares of SL Green’s common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Basis of Quarterly Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(Unaudited)~~June 30, 2013

~~March 31, 2013~~(unaudited)

~~Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United~~ States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position of SLGOP at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, and the results of operations for the periods presented have been included. The 2013 operating results for the period presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our subsidiaries, which are wholly-owned or controlled by us. Entities which we do not control through our voting interest and entities which are variable interest entities, but where we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method or as debt and preferred equity investments. See Note 5, “Debt and Preferred Equity Investments” and Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.” All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

We consolidate variable interest entities, or VIEs, in which we are considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Included in commercial real estate properties on our consolidated balance sheets as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are approximately $~~596~~599.13 million and $607.4 million, respectively, related to our consolidated VIEs. Included in mortgages and other loans payable on our consolidated balance sheets as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are approximately $~~377~~375.43 million and $379.6 million, respectively, related to our consolidated VIEs.

A noncontrolling interest in a consolidated subsidiary is defined as the portion of the equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Noncontrolling interests are required to be presented as a separate component of capital in the consolidated balance sheet and the presentation of net income was modified to ~~require~~present earnings and other comprehensive income ~~to be~~ attributed to controlling and noncontrolling interests.

We assess the accounting treatment for each joint venture and debt and preferred equity investment. This assessment includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine which party has what rights and whether those rights are protective or participating. For all VIE’s, we review such agreements in order to determine which party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. In situations where we and our partner approves, among other things, the annual budget, receives a detailed monthly reporting package from us, meets on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture, reviews and approves the joint venture’s tax return before filing, and approves all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property, we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power of the activities that most significantly impact the performance of our joint venture. Our joint venture agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan.

Investment in Commercial Real Estate Properties

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indications that the value of our real estate properties may be impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. A property’s value is considered impaired if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges for consolidated properties) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the calculated fair value of the property. In ~~addition~~June 2013, we ~~assess~~recorded ~~our~~a ~~investments~~$2.2 inmillion ~~unconsolidated~~impairment ~~joint~~charge ~~ventures~~in ~~for~~connection ~~recoverability,~~with ~~and~~the ifexpected itsale isof ~~determined~~300 ~~that~~Main aStreet ~~loss~~ in ~~value~~Stamford, ofConnecticut, ~~the~~which ~~investment~~ is ~~other~~accounted ~~than~~for ~~temporary,~~as weheld ~~write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity investments~~ for ~~impairment~~sale ~~based~~as ~~on the joint venture’s projected discounted cash flows. We do not believe that the values~~ of ~~any of our consolidated properties or equity investments were impaired at either March~~June 3130, 2013 ~~or December 31, 2012~~.

9We assess our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the investment is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity investments for impairment based on the joint venture’s projected discounted cash flows. We do not believe that the values of any of our consolidated properties or equity investments were impaired at either June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

~~Table of Contents~~9

SLTable ~~Green~~of ~~Operating Partnership, L.P.~~Contents

~~Notes~~SL toGreen ~~Consolidated~~Operating ~~Financial~~Partnership, ~~Statements~~L.P.

~~(Unaudited)~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~March~~June 3130, 2013

~~We allocate the purchase price of real estate to land and building~~ (~~inclusive of tenant improvements~~unaudited) and, if determined to be material, intangibles, such as the value of above-, below- and at-market leases and origination costs associated with the in-place leases. We depreciate the amount allocated to building (inclusive of tenant improvements) and other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to 40 years and from one to 14 years, respectively. The values of the above- and below-market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease, which generally range from one to 14 years. The value associated with in-place leases is amortized over the expected term of the associated lease, which generally ranges from one to 14 years. If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date). We assess fair value of the leases based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. To the extent acquired leases contain fixed rate renewal options that are below market and determined to be material, we amortize such below market lease value into rental income over the renewal period.

WeWhen ~~recognized~~we anacquire ~~increase~~equity ofinterests ~~approximately~~in ~~$3.9~~an ~~million~~existing ~~and~~unconsolidated ~~$2.1~~joint ~~million~~venture inand ~~rental~~gain ~~revenue~~control ~~for~~over the ~~three months ended March 31~~investment, ~~2013~~we ~~and~~record ~~2012,~~the ~~respectively,~~consolidated ~~for~~investment ~~the~~at ~~amortization~~fair ofvalue. ~~aggregate~~The ~~below-market~~difference ~~leases~~between inthe ~~excess~~book value of ~~above-market~~our ~~leases~~equity ~~and~~investment aon ~~reduction~~the inpurchase ~~lease~~date ~~origination~~and ~~costs,~~our ~~resulting~~share ~~from~~of the ~~allocation~~fair value of the investment’s purchase price ofis ~~the~~recorded ~~applicable~~as ~~properties.~~a Wepurchase ~~recognized~~price afair ~~reduction~~value adjustment in ~~interest~~our ~~expense~~consolidated ~~for~~statements ~~the~~of ~~amortization~~income. ofIn ~~the~~April 2013, ~~above-market~~we ~~rate~~recognized ~~mortgages~~a ~~assumed~~purchase ofprice ~~approximately~~fair ~~$1.3~~value ~~million~~adjustment ~~and~~of $1(2.03) million ~~for~~in connection with the ~~three~~consolidation ~~months~~of ~~ended~~16 ~~March 31~~Court Street, ~~2013~~which ~~and~~was ~~2012,~~previously ~~respectively~~accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint venture.

~~The~~We ~~following~~allocate ~~summarizes~~the ~~our~~purchase ~~identified~~price ~~intangible~~of ~~assets~~real estate to land and building (~~acquired~~inclusive of tenant improvements) and, if determined to be material, intangibles, such as the value of above- and below-market leases and origination costs associated with the in-place leases. We depreciate the amount allocated to building (inclusive of tenant improvements) and other intangible ~~liabilities~~assets over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to 40 years and from one to 14 years, respectively. The values of the above- and below-market leases are amortized and recorded as either an increase (~~acquired~~in the case of below-market leases) asor a decrease (in the case of ~~March 31~~above-market leases) to rental income over the remaining term of the associated lease, ~~2013~~which generally range from one to 14 years. The value associated with in-place leases is amortized over the expected term of the associated lease, which generally ranges from one to 14 years. If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and ~~December 31~~no rental payments are being made on the lease, ~~2012~~any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (~~amounts~~or incharged ~~thousands~~against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date):. We assess fair value of the leases based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. To the extent acquired leases contain fixed rate renewal options that are below market and determined to be material, we amortize such below market lease value into rental income over the renewal period.

	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
Identified intangible assets (included in other assets):
Gross amount	$	725,708		$	725,861
Accumulated amortization	(279,714		)	(263,107		)
Net	$	445,994		$	462,754
Identified intangible liabilities (included in deferred revenue):
Gross amount	$	652,117		$	651,921
Accumulated amortization	(374,239		)	(357,225		)
Net	$	277,878		$	294,696

We recognized an increase of approximately $6.2 million, $10.1 million, $2.8 million and $4.8 million in rental revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for the amortization of aggregate below-market leases in excess of above-market leases and a reduction in lease origination costs, resulting from the allocation of the purchase price of the applicable properties. We recognized an increase/(reduction) in interest expense for the amortization of the above-market rate mortgages assumed of approximately $(1.3) million, $(2.6) million, $1.6 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

~~Fair~~The ~~Value~~following ~~Measurements~~summarizes our identified intangible assets (acquired above-market leases and in-place leases) and intangible liabilities (acquired below-market leases) as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, FASB guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Identified intangible assets (included in other assets):
Gross amount	$	732,160		$	725,861
Accumulated amortization	(296,573		)	(263,107		)
Net	$	435,587		$	462,754

Identified intangible liabilities (included in deferred revenue):
Gross amount	$	667,495		$	651,921
Accumulated amortization	(391,631		)	(357,225		)
Net	$	275,864		$	294,696

WeFair ~~determined~~Value the fair value of our current investments in marketable securities using Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. Additionally, we determined the valuation allowance for loan losses based on Level 3 inputs. See Note 5, “Debt and Preferred Equity Investments.”Measurements

~~The~~Fair ~~estimated~~value ~~fair~~is ~~values~~a ofmarket-based ~~tangible~~measurement, ~~and~~not ~~intangible~~an ~~assets~~entity-specific measurement, and ~~liabilities~~should ~~recorded~~be indetermined ~~connection~~based ~~with~~on ~~business~~the ~~combinations~~assumptions ~~are~~that ~~based~~market onparticipants ~~Level~~would 3use ~~inputs~~in pricing the asset or liability. WeAs ~~estimate~~a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair ~~values~~value measurements, FASB guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on ~~cash~~market ~~flow~~data ~~projections~~obtained ~~utilizing~~from ~~appropriate~~sources ~~discount~~independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and~~/or~~ ~~capitalization~~2 ~~rates~~of the hierarchy) and ~~available~~the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market ~~information~~participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

We ~~determine~~determined ~~impairment~~the infair ~~real~~value ~~estate~~of ~~investments~~our ~~and~~current ~~debt and preferred equity~~ investments, ~~including~~in ~~intangibles,~~marketable ~~utilizing~~securities ~~cash~~using ~~flow~~Level ~~projections that apply estimated revenue and expense growth rates~~1, ~~discount~~Level ~~rates~~2 and ~~capitalization rates, which are classified as~~ Level 3 inputs.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(Unaudited)~~June 30, 2013

~~March 31, 2013~~(unaudited)

WeThe ~~use~~estimated ~~the~~fair ~~following~~values ~~methods~~of tangible and ~~assumptions~~intangible assets and liabilities recorded in ~~estimating~~connection with business combinations are based on Level 3 inputs. We estimate fair ~~value~~values ~~disclosures~~based ~~for~~on ~~financial~~cash ~~instruments~~flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information.

~~· Cash~~We ~~and~~determine ~~cash~~impairment ~~equivalents,~~in ~~restricted~~real ~~cash,~~estate ~~accounts~~investments ~~receivable, accounts payable~~ and ~~accrued~~debt ~~expenses,~~ and ~~other~~preferred ~~assets~~equity ~~and~~investments, ~~liabilities: The~~including ~~carrying~~intangibles, ~~amount~~utilizing of cash ~~and~~flow ~~cash~~projections ~~equivalents,~~that ~~restricted~~apply ~~cash,~~estimated ~~accounts~~revenue ~~receivable, accounts payable~~ and ~~accrued~~expense ~~expenses~~growth rates, ~~and~~discount ~~other~~rates ~~assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~capitalization ~~reported~~rates, inwhich ~~our~~are ~~consolidated~~classified ~~balance~~as ~~sheets~~Level ~~approximates~~3 ~~fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments~~inputs.

~~· Debt~~We ~~and~~use ~~preferred~~the ~~equity~~following ~~investments: The~~methods ~~fair value of debt~~ and ~~preferred~~assumptions ~~equity~~in ~~investments~~estimating isfair ~~estimated~~value bydisclosures ~~discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same maturities would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. See “Reserve~~ for ~~Possible~~financial ~~Credit Losses” below regarding valuation allowances for loan losses~~instruments.

· ~~Derivative~~Cash ~~instruments:~~and ~~The~~cash ~~fair~~equivalents, ~~value~~restricted ofcash, ~~derivative~~accounts ~~instruments~~receivable, isand ~~based~~accounts onpayable ~~current~~and ~~market~~accrued ~~data~~expenses: The ~~received~~carrying ~~from~~amount ~~financial~~of ~~sources~~cash ~~that~~and ~~trade~~cash ~~such~~equivalents, ~~instruments~~restricted ~~and~~cash, ~~are~~accounts ~~based~~receivable, onand ~~prevailing~~accounts ~~market~~payable ~~data~~ and ~~derived~~accrued ~~from~~expenses ~~third~~reported ~~party~~in ~~proprietary~~our ~~models~~consolidated ~~based~~balance ~~on-well~~sheets ~~recognized~~approximates ~~financial~~fair ~~principles~~value ~~and~~due ~~reasonable~~to ~~estimates~~the ~~about~~short ~~relevant~~term ~~future~~nature ~~market~~of ~~conditions~~these instruments.

· ~~Mortgage~~Debt and ~~other~~preferred ~~loans~~equity ~~payable and other debt~~investments: The fair value of ~~borrowings~~debt and preferred equity investments is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar ~~borrowings~~loans ~~could~~with the same maturities would be made byto usborrowers with similar credit ratings. See “Reserve for Possible Credit Losses” below regarding valuation allowances for loan losses.

· Derivative instruments: The ~~methodologies~~fair ~~used~~value ~~for~~of ~~measuring~~derivative ~~fair~~instruments ~~value~~is ~~have~~based ~~been~~on ~~categorized~~current ~~into~~market ~~three~~data ~~broad~~received ~~levels~~from asfinancial ~~follows:~~sources that trade such instruments and are based on prevailing market data and derived from third party proprietary models based on well-recognized financial principles and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions.

~~Level~~· Mortgage 1and —other ~~Quoted~~loans ~~prices~~payable inand ~~active~~other ~~markets~~debt: The ~~for~~fair ~~identical~~value ~~instruments~~of borrowings is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar borrowings could be made by us.

~~Level~~The 2methodologies —used ~~Valuations~~for ~~based~~measuring ~~principally~~fair onvalue ~~other~~have ~~observable~~been ~~market~~categorized ~~parameters,~~into ~~including~~three broad levels as follows:

· Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for ~~similar~~identical instruments,.

~~· Quoted~~Level ~~prices~~2 in— ~~less~~Valuations ~~active~~based orprincipally ~~inactive~~on ~~markets~~other ~~for~~observable ~~identical~~market ~~or similar instruments~~parameters, including

· ~~Other~~Quoted ~~observable~~prices ~~inputs~~in ~~(such~~active asmarkets ~~interest~~for ~~rates,~~similar ~~yield curves~~instruments, ~~volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates), and~~

· ~~Market~~Quoted ~~corroborated~~prices ~~inputs~~in ~~(derived~~less ~~principally~~active ~~from~~ or ~~corroborated~~inactive bymarkets ~~observable~~for ~~market~~identical ~~data).~~or similar instruments,

~~Level~~· Other 3observable —inputs ~~Valuations~~(such ~~based~~as ~~significantly~~interest onrates, ~~unobservable~~yield ~~inputs.~~curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates), and

· ~~Valuations~~Market ~~based~~corroborated oninputs ~~third-party indications~~ (~~broker~~derived ~~quotes~~principally orfrom ~~counterparty quotes) which were, in turn, based significantly on unobservable inputs~~ or ~~were~~corroborated ~~otherwise~~by ~~not~~observable ~~supportable~~market ~~as Level 2 valuations~~data).

~~· Valuations~~Level ~~based~~3 on— ~~internal~~Valuations ~~models~~based ~~with~~significantly ~~significant~~on unobservable inputs.

~~These~~· Valuations ~~levels~~based ~~form~~on athird-party ~~hierarchy.~~indications We(broker ~~follow~~quotes ~~this~~or ~~hierarchy~~counterparty ~~for~~quotes) ~~our~~which ~~assets~~were, ~~and~~in ~~liabilities~~turn, ~~measured~~based atsignificantly ~~fair value~~ on aunobservable ~~recurring~~inputs ~~and~~or ~~nonrecurring~~were ~~basis.~~otherwise ~~The~~not ~~classifications~~supportable ~~are~~as ~~based~~Level on2 ~~the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement~~valuations.

~~Investment~~· Valuations inbased ~~Marketable~~on ~~Securities~~internal models with significant unobservable inputs.

WeThese ~~invest~~levels inform ~~marketable~~a ~~securities~~hierarchy. AtWe ~~the~~follow ~~time~~this ofhierarchy ~~purchase, we are required to designate a security as held-to-maturity, available-~~for~~-sale,~~ orour ~~trading~~assets ~~depending on ability~~ and ~~intent.~~liabilities Wemeasured ~~do not have any securities designated as held-to-maturity or trading~~ at ~~this time. Securities available-for-sale are reported at~~ fair value ~~pursuant~~on ~~to ASC 820-10, with the net unrealized gains or losses reported as~~ a ~~component~~recurring ofand ~~accumulated~~nonrecurring ~~other comprehensive loss~~basis. ~~Unrealized~~ ~~losses~~The ~~that~~classifications are ~~determined~~based toon bethe ~~other-than-temporary~~lowest ~~are~~level ~~recognized~~of ininput ~~earnings~~that ~~up to their credit component. Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012~~ is ~~approximately~~significant ~~$5.1~~to ~~million~~the ~~and~~fair ~~$3.4~~value ~~million, respectively, in net unrealized gains related to marketable securities~~measurement.

~~The~~Investment ~~cost~~in ofMarketable ~~bonds and marketable securities sold was determined using the specific identification method.~~Securities

We invest in marketable securities. At ~~March~~the time of purchase, we are required to designate a security as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading depending on ability and intent. We do not have any securities designated as held-to-maturity or trading at this time. Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value pursuant to ASC 820-10, with the net unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Unrealized losses that are determined to be other-than-temporary are recognized in earnings up to their credit component. Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, weis ~~held~~approximately ~~the~~$3.2 ~~following~~million ~~marketable~~and ~~securities~~$3.4 (million, respectively, in ~~thousands):~~net unrealized gains related to marketable securities.

	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Level 1 — Equity marketable securities	$	3,903	$	2,202
Level 2 — Commercial mortgage-backed securities	15,521		15,575
Level 3 — Rake bonds	3,570		3,652
Total marketable securities available-for-sale	$	22,994	$	21,429

The cost of bonds and marketable securities sold was determined using the specific identification method.

The cost basis of the Level 3 securities was $3.7 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. There were no sales of Level 3 securities during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The Level 3 securities mature at various times through 2030.11

11Table of Contents

~~Table~~SL ofGreen ~~Contents~~Operating Partnership, L.P.

SLNotes ~~Green~~to ~~Operating~~Consolidated ~~Partnership,~~Financial ~~L.P.~~Statements

~~Notes~~June 30, ~~to Consolidated Financial Statements~~2013

(~~Unaudited~~unaudited)

~~March~~At June 3130, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we held the following marketable securities (in thousands):

Revenue Recognition

	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Level 1 — Equity marketable securities	$	3,371	$	2,202
Level 2 — Commercial mortgage-backed securities	19,406		15,575
Level 3 — Rake bonds	3,489		3,652
Total marketable securities available-for-sale	$	26,266	$	21,429

~~Rental~~The ~~revenue~~cost ~~is recognized on a straight-line~~ basis ~~over the term~~ of the ~~lease.~~Level ~~Rental~~3 ~~revenue~~securities ~~recognition~~was ~~commences when the tenant takes possession or controls the physical use of the leased space~~$3.7 Inmillion ~~order~~at ~~for~~both ~~the tenant to take possession~~June 30, ~~the~~2013 ~~leased~~and ~~space must be substantially ready for its intended use. To determine whether the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use~~December 31, ~~management evaluates whether we are or the tenant is the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes. When management concludes that we are the owner of tenant improvements~~2012, ~~rental revenue recognition begins when the tenant takes possession of the finished space, which is when such tenant improvements are substantially complete~~respectively. InThere ~~certain~~were ~~instances,~~no ~~when~~sales ~~management concludes that we are not the owner (the tenant is the owner)~~ of ~~tenant~~Level ~~improvements,~~3 ~~rental~~securities ~~revenue~~during ~~recognition begins when~~ the ~~tenant~~three ~~takes~~and ~~possession~~six ofmonths orended ~~controls the space. When management concludes that we are the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes~~June 30, ~~management records amounts funded to construct the tenant improvements as a capital asset~~2013. For these tenant improvements, management records amounts reimbursed by tenants as a reduction of the capital asset. When management concludes that the tenant is the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes, management records our contribution towards those improvements as a lease incentive, which is included in deferred leasing costs on our consolidated balance sheets and amortized as a reduction to rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The ~~excess~~Level of3 ~~rents~~securities ~~recognized~~mature ~~over~~at ~~amounts~~various ~~contractually~~times ~~due~~through ~~pursuant to the underlying leases are included in deferred rents receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets~~2030. We establish, on a current basis, an allowance for future potential tenant credit losses, which may occur against this account. The balance reflected on the consolidated balance sheet is net of such allowance.

InRevenue addition to base rent, our tenants also generally will pay their pro rata share of increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses for the building over a base year. In some leases, in lieu of paying additional rent based upon increases in building operating expenses, the tenant will pay additional rent based upon increases in the wage rate paid to porters over the porters’ wage rate in effect during a base year or increases in the consumer price index over the index value in effect during a base year. In addition, many of our leases contain fixed percentage increases over the base rent to cover escalations. Electricity is most often supplied by the landlord either on a sub-metered basis, or rent inclusion basis (i.e., a fixed fee is included in the rent for electricity, which amount may increase based upon increases in electricity rates or increases in electrical usage by the tenant). Base building services other than electricity (such as heat, air conditioning and freight elevator service during business hours, and base building cleaning) are typically provided at no additional cost, with the tenant paying additional rent only for services which exceed base building services or for services which are provided outside normal business hours. These escalations are based on actual expenses incurred in the prior calendar year. If the expenses in the current year are different from those in the prior year, then during the current year, the escalations will be adjusted to reflect the actual expenses for the current year.Recognition

WeRental ~~record~~revenue ais ~~gain~~recognized on ~~sale~~a straight-line basis over the term of ~~real~~the ~~estate~~lease. Rental revenue recognition commences when ~~title~~the istenant ~~conveyed~~takes possession or controls the physical use of the leased space. In order for the tenant to take possession, the ~~buyer~~leased space must be substantially ready for its intended use. To determine whether the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use, ~~subject~~management evaluates whether we are or the tenant is the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes. When management concludes that we are the owner of tenant improvements, rental revenue recognition begins when the tenant takes possession of the finished space, which is when such tenant improvements are substantially complete. In certain instances, when management concludes that we are not the owner (the tenant is the owner) of tenant improvements, rental revenue recognition begins when the tenant takes possession of or controls the space. When management concludes that we are the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes, management records amounts funded to construct the ~~buyer’s~~tenant ~~financial~~improvements ~~commitment~~as ~~being~~a ~~sufficient~~capital asset. For these tenant improvements, management records amounts reimbursed by tenants as a reduction of the capital asset. When management concludes that the tenant is the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes, management records our contribution towards those improvements as a lease incentive, which is included in deferred leasing costs on our consolidated balance sheets and amortized as a reduction to ~~provide~~rental ~~economic~~revenue ~~substance~~on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the ~~sale~~underlying ~~and~~leases weare ~~have~~included noin ~~substantial~~deferred ~~economic~~rents ~~involvement~~receivable ~~with~~on the ~~buyer~~accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We establish, on a current basis, an allowance for future potential tenant credit losses, which may occur against this account. The balance reflected on the consolidated balance sheet is net of such allowance.

~~Interest~~In ~~income~~addition onto ~~debt~~base rent, our tenants also generally will pay their pro rata share of increases in real estate taxes and ~~preferred~~operating ~~equity~~expenses ~~investments~~for isthe ~~recognized~~building over ~~the~~a ~~life~~base year. In some leases, in lieu of ~~the~~paying ~~investment~~additional ~~using~~rent ~~the~~based ~~effective~~upon ~~interest~~increases ~~method~~in ~~and~~building ~~recognized~~operating onexpenses, the ~~accrual~~tenant ~~basis. Fees~~will ~~received~~pay additional rent based upon increases in ~~connection~~the ~~with~~wage ~~loan~~rate ~~commitments~~paid ~~are~~to ~~deferred~~porters ~~until~~over the ~~loan~~porters’ iswage ~~funded~~rate ~~and~~in ~~are~~effect ~~then~~during ~~recognized~~a base year or increases in the consumer price index over the ~~term~~index value in effect during a base year. In addition, many of ~~the~~our ~~loan~~leases ascontain anfixed ~~adjustment~~percentage increases over the base rent to ~~yield~~cover escalations. ~~Anticipated~~ ~~exit~~Electricity ~~fees~~is most often supplied by the landlord either on a sub-metered basis, ~~whose~~or ~~collection~~rent isinclusion ~~expected~~basis (i.e., ~~are~~a ~~also~~fixed ~~recognized~~fee ~~over~~is included in the ~~term~~rent offor electricity, which amount may increase based upon increases in electricity rates or increases in electrical usage by the ~~loan~~tenant). Base building services other than electricity (such as anheat, ~~adjustment~~air toconditioning ~~yield~~and freight elevator service during business hours, and base building cleaning) are typically provided at no additional cost, with the tenant paying additional rent only for services which exceed base building services or for services which are provided outside normal business hours. ~~Fees~~ These escalations are based on ~~commitments~~actual ~~that~~expenses ~~expire~~incurred ~~unused~~in the prior calendar year. If the expenses in the current year are ~~recognized~~different atfrom ~~expiration~~those in the prior year, then during the current year, the escalations will be adjusted to reflect the actual expenses for the current year.

~~Income~~We ~~recognition~~record isa ~~generally~~gain ~~suspended~~on ~~for~~sale ~~debt and preferred equity investments at the earlier~~ of ~~the~~real ~~date~~estate ~~at which payments become 90 days past due or~~ when, intitle ~~the opinion of management, a full recovery of interest income and principal becomes doubtful. Interest income recognition~~ is ~~resumed~~conveyed ~~when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated~~ to ~~be resumed. Interest is recorded as income on impaired loans only to~~ the ~~extent cash is received. Several of the debt and preferred equity investments provide for accrual of interest at specified rates~~buyer, ~~which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate~~ subject to ~~management~~the buyer’s ~~determination~~financial ~~that~~commitment ~~accrued~~being ~~interest~~sufficient ~~and~~to ~~outstanding~~provide ~~principal~~economic ~~are~~substance ~~ultimately~~to ~~collectible, based on~~ the ~~underlying~~sale ~~collateral~~ and ~~operations~~we ofhave ~~the~~no ~~borrower.~~substantial Ifeconomic ~~management~~involvement ~~cannot~~with ~~make this determination, interest income above~~ the ~~current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt~~buyer.

IfInterest weincome ~~purchase~~on a debt orand preferred equity ~~investment~~investments atis arecognized ~~discount,~~over ~~intend~~the tolife ~~hold~~of itthe ~~until~~investment ~~maturity~~using ~~and~~the ~~expect~~effective tointerest ~~recover~~method and recognized on the ~~full~~accrual ~~value~~basis. Fees ofreceived ~~the~~in ~~investment,~~connection wewith ~~accrete~~loan ~~the~~commitments ~~discount~~are ~~into~~deferred ~~income~~until asthe anloan ~~adjustment~~is tofunded ~~yield~~and are then recognized over the term of the ~~investment.~~loan Ifas wean ~~purchase~~adjustment ato ~~debt~~yield. Anticipated orexit ~~preferred~~fees, ~~equity~~whose ~~investment~~collection atis aexpected, ~~discount~~are ~~with~~also recognized over the ~~intention~~term of ~~foreclosing~~the loan as an adjustment to yield. Fees on ~~the~~commitments ~~collateral,~~that weexpire dounused ~~not~~are ~~accrete~~recognized ~~the~~at ~~discount~~expiration.

~~Reserve~~Income recognition is generally suspended for ~~Possible~~debt ~~Credit~~and ~~Losses~~preferred equity investments at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90 days past due or when, in the opinion of management, a full recovery of interest income and principal becomes doubtful. Interest income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed.

The expense for possible credit losses in connection with debt and preferred equity investments is the charge to earnings to increase the allowance for possible credit losses to the level that we estimate to be adequate, based on Level 3 data, considering delinquencies, 12

12Table of Contents

~~Table~~SL ofGreen ~~Contents~~Operating Partnership, L.P.

SLNotes ~~Green~~to ~~Operating~~Consolidated ~~Partnership,~~Financial ~~L.P.~~Statements

~~Notes~~June 30, ~~to Consolidated Financial Statements~~2013

(~~Unaudited~~unaudited)

~~March 31~~Interest is recorded as income on impaired loans only to the extent cash is received. Several of the debt and preferred equity investments provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, ~~2013~~which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management’s determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If management cannot make this determination, interest income above the current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt.

~~loss~~If ~~experience~~we ~~and~~purchase ~~collateral~~a ~~quality. Other~~debt ~~factors~~or ~~considered~~preferred ~~relate~~equity investment at a discount, intend to ~~geographic~~hold ~~trends~~it until maturity and ~~product~~expect ~~diversification,~~to recover the ~~size~~full value of the ~~portfolio~~investment, ~~and~~we ~~current~~accrete ~~economic~~the ~~conditions. Based~~discount ~~upon~~into ~~these~~income ~~factors,~~as wean ~~establish~~adjustment to yield over the ~~provision~~term ~~for~~of ~~possible~~the ~~credit~~investment. ~~loss~~If onwe ~~each~~purchase ~~individual~~a ~~investment. When~~debt itor ispreferred ~~probable~~equity ~~that~~investment weat ~~will~~a bediscount ~~unable~~with tothe ~~collect~~intention ~~all~~of ~~amounts~~foreclosing ~~contractually~~on ~~due~~the collateral, ~~the~~we ~~investment~~do isnot ~~considered~~accrete ~~impaired~~the discount.

~~Where~~Reserve ~~impairment~~for isPossible ~~indicated~~Credit on an investment that is held to maturity, a valuation allowance is measured based upon the excess of the recorded investment amount over the net fair value of the collateral. Any deficiency between the carrying amount of an asset and the calculated value of the collateral is charged to expense. The write-off of the reserve balance is called a charge off. We recorded no loan loss reserves during the three months ended March 31, 2013. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recorded loan loss reserves of $3.0 million on investments being held to maturity and approximately $2.4 million in recoveries in connection with the sale of our investments. This is included in loan loss and other investment reserves, net of recoveries in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.Losses

~~Debt~~The ~~and~~expense ~~preferred equity investments held~~ for ~~sale~~possible ~~are~~credit ~~carried~~losses atin ~~the~~connection ~~lower~~with ofdebt ~~cost~~and orpreferred ~~fair~~equity ~~market~~investments ~~value~~is ~~using~~the ~~available~~charge ~~market~~to ~~information~~earnings ~~obtained~~to ~~through~~increase ~~consultation~~the ~~with~~allowance ~~dealers~~for orpossible ~~other~~credit ~~originators~~losses ofto ~~such~~the ~~investments~~level asthat ~~well~~we asestimate ~~discounted~~to ~~cash~~be ~~flow~~adequate, ~~models~~ based on Level 3 data, ~~pursuant~~considering todelinquencies, ~~ASC~~loss ~~820-10.~~experience Asand ~~circumstances~~collateral ~~change,~~quality. Other ~~management~~factors ~~may~~considered ~~conclude~~relate ~~not~~ to ~~sell~~geographic antrends ~~investment~~and ~~designated~~product ~~as held for sale. In such situations~~diversification, the ~~investment~~size ~~will~~of bethe ~~reclassified~~portfolio ~~at its net carrying value to debt~~ and ~~preferred~~current ~~equity~~economic ~~investments held to maturity~~conditions. ~~For~~Based upon these ~~reclassified investments~~factors, ~~the~~we ~~difference~~establish ~~between~~ the ~~current~~provision ~~carrying~~for ~~value~~possible ~~and~~credit ~~the~~losses ~~expected~~on ~~cash~~each toindividual beinvestment. When ~~collected~~it atis ~~maturity~~probable that we will be ~~accreted~~unable ~~into~~to ~~income~~collect ~~over~~all ~~the~~amounts ~~remaining~~contractually ~~term~~due, of the investment is considered impaired.

~~Income~~Where ~~Taxes~~impairment is indicated on an investment that is held to maturity, a valuation allowance is measured based upon the excess of the recorded investment amount over the net fair value of the collateral. Any deficiency between the carrying amount of an asset and the calculated value of the collateral is charged to expense. The write-off of the reserve balance is called a charge off. We recorded no loan loss reserves during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded loan loss reserves of zero and $3.0 million, respectively, on investments being held to maturity and approximately zero and $2.4 million, respectively, in recoveries in connection with the sale of our investments. This is included in loan loss and other investment reserves, net of recoveries in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

~~The~~Debt ~~Operating~~and ~~Partnership~~preferred isequity ainvestments ~~partnership~~held ~~and,~~for assale aare ~~result,~~carried ~~all~~at ~~income~~the ~~and~~lower ~~losses~~of cost or fair market value using available market information obtained through consultation with dealers or other originators of ~~the~~such ~~partnership~~investments ~~are~~as ~~allocated~~well toas ~~the~~discounted ~~partners~~cash ~~for~~flow ~~inclusion~~models inbased ~~their~~on ~~respective~~Level ~~income~~3 ~~tax~~data ~~returns~~pursuant to ASC 820-10. ~~The~~As ~~only~~circumstances ~~provision~~change, management may conclude not to sell an investment designated as held for ~~income~~sale. In ~~taxes~~such insituations, the ~~accompanying~~investment ~~consolidated~~will ~~financial~~be ~~statements~~reclassified ~~relates~~at its net carrying value to ~~the~~debt ~~Operating~~and ~~Partnership’s~~preferred ~~consolidated~~equity ~~taxable~~investments ~~REIT~~held ~~subsidiaries~~to maturity. For Wethese ~~may~~reclassified ~~also~~investments, bethe ~~subject~~difference tobetween ~~certain~~the ~~state,~~current ~~local~~carrying value and ~~franchise~~the ~~taxes~~expected cash to be collected at maturity will be accreted into income over the remaining term of the investment.

~~Pursuant~~Income to amendments to the Code that became effective January 1, 2001, SL Green has elected, and may in the future, elect to treat certain of its existing or newly created corporate subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or a TRS. In general, a TRS of SL Green may perform non-customary services for its tenants, hold assets that SL Green cannot hold directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business. SL Green’s TRSs, which are consolidated into SLGOP, generate income, resulting in Federal and state income tax liability for these entities. SL Green’s TRSs recorded Federal, state and local tax provisions of $1.6 million and zero during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and made estimated tax payments of $0.1 million and zero during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.Taxes

WeThe ~~follow~~Operating aPartnership ~~two-step~~is ~~approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that~~ a ~~tax~~partnership ~~position~~and, ~~based~~as ~~solely~~a ~~on its technical merits~~result, isall ~~more-likely-than-not~~income toand belosses ~~sustained~~of ~~upon~~the ~~examination.~~partnership ~~Measurement~~are ~~(step~~allocated ~~two)~~to ~~determines~~ the ~~amount~~partners offor ~~benefit~~inclusion ~~that~~in istheir ~~more-likely-than-not~~respective toincome betax ~~realized upon settlement~~returns. ~~Derecognition~~The ofonly aprovision ~~tax~~for ~~position~~income ~~that~~taxes ~~was~~in ~~previously~~the ~~recognized~~accompanying ~~would~~consolidated ~~occur~~financial ~~when~~statements arelates ~~company~~to ~~subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets~~ the ~~more-likely-than-not~~Operating ~~threshold~~Partnership’s ofconsolidated ~~being~~taxable ~~sustained~~REIT subsidiaries. ~~The~~We ~~use~~may ofalso abe ~~valuation~~subject ~~allowance~~to ascertain astate, ~~substitute~~local ~~for~~and ~~derecognition~~franchise ~~of tax positions is prohibited~~taxes.

~~Stock~~Pursuant to amendments to the Code that became effective January 1, 2001, SL Green has elected, and may in the future, elect to treat certain of its existing or newly created corporate subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or a TRS. In general, a TRS of SL Green may perform non-~~Based~~customary ~~Employee~~services ~~Compensation~~for ~~Plans~~its tenants, hold assets that SL Green cannot hold directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business. SL Green’s TRSs, which are consolidated into SLGOP, generate income, resulting in Federal and state income tax liability for these entities.

SLDuring ~~Green~~the ~~has~~three aand ~~stock-based~~six ~~employee~~months ~~compensation~~ended ~~plan~~June 30, ~~described~~2013, ~~more~~we ~~fully~~recorded inFederal, ~~Note~~state ~~12,~~and ~~“Capital.”~~local ~~All~~tax ~~employees~~provisions of SL$2.3 ~~Green~~million ~~are~~and ~~compensated~~$3.9 ~~through~~million, arespectively, ~~subsidiary~~and made estimated tax payments of ~~SLGOP~~zero and $0.1 SLmillion, ~~Green’s~~respectively. ~~employee~~During ~~and~~the ~~director~~three ~~compensation~~and ~~plans~~six ~~are~~months ~~described~~ended ~~below.~~June 30, ~~Under~~2012, ~~each~~we ~~plan~~recorded Federal, ~~whenever~~state SLand ~~Green~~local ~~issues~~tax ~~common~~provisions orof ~~preferred~~$0.1 ~~stock,~~million weand ~~issue~~less anthan ~~equivalent~~$0.1 ~~number~~million, ofrespectively. ~~operating~~We ~~partnership~~made ~~units~~no ofestimated apayments ~~corresponding~~during ~~class~~the tothree SLand ~~Green~~six months ended June 30, 2012.

SLWe ~~Green’s~~follow ~~stock~~a ~~options~~two-step ~~are~~approach ~~recorded~~for atevaluating ~~fair~~uncertain ~~value~~tax ~~at the time of issuance~~positions. ~~Fair~~Recognition ~~value~~(step ofone) ~~the~~occurs ~~stock~~when ~~options~~an isenterprise ~~determined~~concludes ~~using~~that ~~the~~a ~~Black-Scholes~~tax ~~option-pricing~~position, ~~model.~~based ~~The~~solely ~~Black-Scholes~~on ~~model~~its ~~was~~technical ~~developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options~~merits, ~~which~~is ~~have~~more-likely-than-not noto ~~vesting~~be ~~restrictions~~sustained ~~and~~upon ~~are fully transferable~~examination. In ~~addition,~~Measurement ~~option~~(step ~~valuation~~two) ~~models~~determines ~~require~~ the ~~input~~amount of ~~highly~~benefit ~~subjective~~that ~~assumptions~~is ~~including~~more-likely-than-not ~~the~~to ~~expected~~be ~~stock~~realized ~~price~~upon ~~volatility~~settlement. ~~Because~~ SLDerecognition ~~Green’s~~of ~~plan~~a ~~has~~tax ~~characteristics~~position ~~significantly~~that ~~different~~was ~~from~~previously ~~those~~recognized ofwould ~~traded~~occur ~~options~~when ~~and~~a ~~because~~company ~~changes~~subsequently indetermines ~~the~~that ~~subjective~~a ~~input~~tax ~~assumptions~~position ~~can~~no ~~materially~~longer ~~affect~~meets the ~~fair~~more-likely-than-not ~~value~~threshold ~~estimate,~~of inbeing SLsustained. ~~Green’s~~The ~~opinion,~~use ~~the~~of ~~existing~~a ~~models~~valuation doallowance ~~not~~as ~~necessarily provide~~ a ~~reliable~~substitute ~~single~~for ~~measure~~derecognition of ~~the~~tax ~~fair~~positions ~~value~~is ~~of SL Green’s employee stock options~~prohibited.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(Unaudited)~~June 30, 2013

~~March 31, 2013~~(unaudited)

~~Compensation~~Stock-Based ~~cost~~Employee ~~for~~Compensation stock options, if any, is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the award. SL Green’s policy is to grant options with an exercise price equal to the quoted closing market price of SL Green’s common stock on the grant date. Awards of stock or restricted stock are expensed as compensation over the benefit period based on the fair value of the stock on the grant date.Plans

~~For~~SL ~~share-based~~Green ~~awards~~has ~~with~~ a ~~performance~~stock-based oremployee ~~market~~compensation ~~measure~~plan, wedescribed ~~recognize~~more ~~compensation~~fully ~~cost~~in ~~over~~Note ~~the requisite service period~~12, ~~using the accelerated attribution expense method~~“Capital.” ~~The~~All ~~requisite~~employees ~~service~~of ~~period~~SL ~~begins~~Green onare ~~the~~compensated ~~date~~through ~~the~~a ~~compensation~~subsidiary ~~committee~~ of SLGOP. SL Green’s ~~board~~employee ~~of directors authorizes the award, adopts any relevant performance measures~~ and ~~communicates~~director ~~the award to the employees. For programs with performance measures, the total estimated~~ compensation ~~cost~~plans isare ~~based~~described ~~on the fair value of the award at the applicable reporting date estimated using a binomial model~~below. ~~For~~Under ~~share-based~~each ~~awards for which there is no pre-established performance measure~~plan, wewhenever ~~recognize compensation cost over the service vesting period, which represents the requisite service period, on a straight-line basis. In accordance with the provisions of~~ SL Green’s ~~share-based~~issues ~~incentive~~common ~~compensation~~or ~~plans,~~preferred ~~SL Green accepts the return of shares of its common~~ stock, atwe ~~the~~issue ~~current~~an ~~quoted~~equivalent ~~market~~number ~~price,~~of ~~from~~operating ~~certain~~partnership ~~key~~units ~~employee~~of toa ~~satisfy~~corresponding ~~minimum~~class ~~statutory tax-withholding requirements related~~ to ~~shares~~SL ~~that vested during the period~~Green.

~~Awards~~SL ~~can~~Green’s ~~also~~stock beoptions ~~made~~are inrecorded at fair value at the ~~form~~time of aissuance. ~~separate~~Fair ~~series~~value of ~~our~~the ~~units~~stock ofoptions ~~limited~~is ~~partnership~~determined ~~interest~~using ~~called~~the ~~long~~Black-~~term~~Scholes ~~incentive~~option-pricing ~~plan~~model. ~~units,~~The orBlack-Scholes ~~LTIP~~model ~~Units.~~was ~~LTIP~~developed ~~Units,~~for ~~which~~use ~~can~~in beestimating ~~granted~~the ~~either~~fair asvalue ~~free-standing~~of ~~awards~~traded oroptions, inwhich ~~tandem~~have ~~with~~no ~~other~~vesting ~~awards~~restrictions ~~under~~and SLare ~~Green’s~~fully ~~stock~~transferable. In ~~incentive plan~~addition, ~~are~~option ~~valued~~valuation bymodels ~~reference~~require to the ~~value~~input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because SL Green’s ~~common~~plan ~~stock~~has atcharacteristics ~~the~~significantly ~~time~~different from those of ~~grant,~~traded options and ~~are~~because ~~subject~~changes toin ~~such~~the ~~conditions~~subjective ~~and~~input ~~restrictions~~assumptions ascan materially affect the ~~compensation~~fair ~~committee~~value ofestimate, in SL Green’s ~~board~~opinion, ofthe ~~directors~~existing ~~may~~models ~~determine,~~do ~~including~~not ~~continued~~necessarily ~~employment~~provide ora ~~service,~~reliable ~~computation~~single measure of ~~financial~~the ~~metrics~~fair ~~and/or~~value ~~achievement~~ of ~~pre-established~~SL ~~performance~~Green’s ~~goals~~employee ~~and~~stock ~~objectives~~options.

~~Earnings~~Compensation ~~per~~cost ~~Unit~~for stock options, if any, is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the award. SL Green’s policy is to grant options with an exercise price equal to the quoted closing market price of SL Green’s common stock on the grant date. Awards of stock or restricted stock are expensed as compensation over the benefit period based on the fair value of the stock on the grant date.

WeFor ~~present~~share-based ~~both~~awards ~~basic~~with ~~and~~a ~~diluted~~performance ~~earnings~~or ~~per~~market ~~unit~~measure, orwe ~~EPU.~~recognize ~~Basic~~compensation ~~EPU~~cost ~~excludes~~over ~~dilution~~the ~~and~~requisite isservice ~~computed~~period, byusing ~~dividing~~the ~~net~~accelerated ~~income~~attribution ~~attributable~~expense tomethod. ~~common~~The ~~unitholders~~requisite byservice ~~the~~period ~~weighted~~begins ~~average~~on ~~number~~the ofdate ~~common units outstanding during~~ the ~~period.~~compensation ~~Basic~~committee ~~EPU~~of ~~includes~~SL ~~participating~~Green’s ~~securities,~~board ~~consisting~~ of ~~unvested~~directors ~~restricted~~authorizes ~~stock~~the ~~that~~award, ~~receive~~adopts ~~nonforfeitable~~any ~~dividends~~relevant ~~similar~~performance tomeasures ~~shares~~and ofcommunicates ~~common~~the ~~stock.~~award ~~Diluted~~to ~~EPU reflects~~ the ~~potential~~employees. ~~dilution~~For ~~that~~programs ~~could~~with ~~occur~~performance ifmeasures, ~~securities~~the ortotal ~~other~~estimated ~~contracts~~compensation tocost ~~issue~~is ~~common~~based ~~units~~on ~~were~~the ~~exercised~~fair orvalue ~~converted~~of ~~into~~the ~~common~~award ~~units,~~at ~~where~~the ~~such~~applicable ~~exercise~~reporting ordate ~~conversion~~estimated ~~would~~using ~~result in~~ a ~~lower~~binomial ~~EPU amount~~model. ~~The~~ ~~dilutive~~For ~~effect~~share-based ofawards ~~the~~for ~~outstanding~~which ~~nonvested~~there ~~shares~~is ofno SLpre-established ~~Green~~performance ~~common stock~~measure, orwe ~~nonvested~~recognize ~~shares,~~compensation ~~and~~cost ~~restricted~~over ~~stock~~the ~~units,~~service orvesting ~~RSUs~~period, ~~that~~which ~~have~~represents ~~not~~the ~~yet~~requisite ~~been~~service ~~granted~~period, ~~but~~on ~~are~~a ~~contingently~~straight-line ~~issuable~~basis. ~~under~~In accordance with the provisions of SL Green’s share-based incentive compensation ~~programs~~plans, isSL ~~reflected~~Green inaccepts the ~~weighted~~return ~~average~~of ~~diluted~~ shares ~~calculation by application~~ of ~~the~~its ~~treasury~~common stock, ~~method~~ at the ~~beginning~~current ofquoted ~~the~~market ~~quarterly~~price, ~~period~~from incertain ~~which~~key ~~all~~employee ~~necessary~~to ~~conditions~~satisfy ~~have~~minimum ~~been~~statutory ~~satisfied.~~tax-withholding ~~The~~requirements ~~dilutive~~related ~~effect~~to ofshares ~~stock~~that ~~options~~vested isduring ~~reflected in~~ the ~~weighted average diluted outstanding units calculation by application of the treasury stock method~~period. ~~There is no dilutive effect for the exchangeable senior debentures as the conversion premium will be paid in cash.~~

~~Use~~Awards can also be made in the form of ~~Estimates~~a separate series of our units of limited partnership interest called long-term incentive plan units, or LTIP Units. LTIP Units, which can be granted either as free-standing awards or in tandem with other awards under SL Green’s stock incentive plan, are valued by reference to the value of SL Green’s common stock at the time of grant, and are subject to such conditions and restrictions as the compensation committee of SL Green’s board of directors may determine, including continued employment or service, computation of financial metrics and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives.

~~The~~Earnings ~~preparation~~per of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.Unit

~~Concentrations~~We present both basic and diluted earnings per unit, or EPU. Basic EPU excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to common unitholders by the weighted average number of ~~Credit~~common ~~Risk~~units outstanding during the period. Basic EPU includes participating securities, consisting of unvested restricted stock that receive nonforfeitable dividends similar to shares of common stock. Diluted EPU reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common units were exercised or converted into common units, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower EPU amount. The dilutive effect of stock options is reflected in the weighted average diluted outstanding units calculation by application of the treasury stock method. There is no dilutive effect for the exchangeable senior debentures as the conversion premium will be paid in cash.

~~Financial~~Use ~~instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations~~ of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments, debt and preferred equity investments and accounts receivable. We place our cash investments in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. The collateral securing our debt and preferred equity investments is located in the New York Metropolitan area. See Note 5, “Debt and Preferred Equity Investments.” We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our tenants and require most tenants to provide security deposits or letters of credit. Though these security deposits and letters of credit are insufficient to meet the total value of a tenant’s lease obligation, they are a measure of good faith and a source of funds to offset the economic costs associated with lost rent and the costs associated with re-tenanting the space. Although the properties in our real estate portfolio are primarily located in Manhattan, we also have Suburban properties located in Brooklyn, Long Island, Westchester County, Connecticut, Northern New Jersey and the west coast. The tenants located in our buildings operate in various industries. Other than three tenants who account for approximately 6.0%, 6.5% and 7.0% of our share of annualized cash rent, no other tenant in our portfolio accounted for more than 1.9% of our annualized cash rent, including our share of joint venture annualized cash rent at March 31, 2013. Approximately 9%, 7%, 6% and 6% of our annualized cash rent for consolidated properties for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was attributable to 1515 Broadway, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 420 Lexington Avenue and One Madison Avenue, respectively. In addition, two debt and preferred equity investments accounted for more than 10% of the income earned on debt and preferred equity investments during the three months ended March 31, 2013.Estimates

14The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Table~~Concentrations of ~~Contents~~Credit Risk

SLFinancial ~~Green~~instruments ~~Operating~~that ~~Partnership~~potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments, Ldebt and preferred equity investments and accounts receivable.P We place our cash investments in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. The collateral securing our debt and preferred equity investments is located in the New York Metropolitan area. See Note 5, “Debt and Preferred Equity Investments.” We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our tenants and require most tenants to provide security deposits or letters of credit. Though these security deposits and letters of credit are insufficient to meet the total value of a tenant’s lease obligation, they are a measure of good faith and a source of funds to offset the economic costs associated with

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~14

~~(Unaudited)~~Table of Contents

~~March 31~~SL Green Operating Partnership, ~~2013~~L.P.

~~Reclassification~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Certain~~June 30, ~~prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to our current year presentation primarily in order to eliminate discontinued operations from income from continuing operations.~~2013

~~Accounting Standards Updates~~(unaudited)

Inlost ~~February 2013,~~rent and the ~~FASB~~costs ~~issued~~associated ~~guidance~~with onre-tenanting the ~~presentation~~space. Although ~~and~~the ~~disclosure~~properties ofin ~~reclassification~~our ~~adjustments~~real ~~out~~estate ofportfolio ~~accumulated~~are ~~other~~primarily ~~comprehensive~~located ~~income~~in Manhattan, orwe ~~AOCI.~~also have Suburban properties located in Brooklyn, Long Island, Westchester County, Connecticut, Northern New Jersey and the west coast. The ~~standard~~tenants ~~requires~~located anin ~~entity~~our tobuildings ~~present~~operate ~~information~~in ~~about~~various ~~significant~~industries. Other ~~items~~than ~~reclassified~~three ~~out~~tenants who account for approximately 6.0%, 6.4% and 7.1% of ~~AOCI~~our byshare ~~component~~of ~~either~~annualized oncash ~~the~~rent, ~~face~~no other tenant in our portfolio accounted for more than 1.9% of ~~the~~our ~~statement~~annualized ~~where~~cash ~~net~~rent, ~~income~~including isour ~~presented~~share orof asjoint aventure ~~separate~~annualized ~~disclosure~~cash inrent for the ~~notes~~three tomonths ~~financial~~ended ~~statements~~June 30, 2013. ~~The~~Approximately ~~guidance~~9%, ~~became~~6% ~~effective~~and ~~for~~6% ~~calendar~~of ~~year-end~~our ~~public~~annualized ~~companies~~cash ~~beginning~~rent infor consolidated properties for the ~~first~~three ~~quarter~~months ofended June 30, 2013 was attributable to 1515 Broadway, 1185 Avenue of the Americas and ~~its~~One ~~adoption~~Madison ~~did~~Avenue, ~~not~~respectively. In ~~have~~addition, atwo ~~material~~debt ~~impact~~and preferred equity investments accounted for more than 10% of the income earned on ~~our~~debt ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~preferred ~~statements~~equity investments during the three months ended June 30, 2013.

~~3. Property Acquisitions~~Reclassification

~~2013~~Certain ~~Acquisitions~~prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to our current year presentation primarily in order to eliminate discontinued operations from income from continuing operations and to reclassify deferred origination fees from deferred income to debt and preferred equity investments.

InAccounting ~~March 2013,~~Standards we, along with Magnum Real Estate Group, acquired 84 residential apartment units, consisting of 72 apartment units and 12 townhouses, located at 248-252 Bedford Avenue, Williamsburg, Brooklyn for $54.9 million. Simultaneous with the closing, the joint venture closed on a five-year $22.0 million mortgage loan which carries a floating rate of interest of 225 basis points over LIBOR. The property sits on top of a commercial property already owned by us. We hold a 90% controlling interest in this joint venture. We are currently in the process of analyzing the fair value of the investment. Therefore, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to change.Updates

~~2012~~In ~~Acquisitions~~February 2013, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation and disclosure of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI. The standard requires an entity to present information about significant items reclassified out of AOCI by component either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notes to financial statements. The guidance became effective for calendar year-end public companies beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In December 2012, we acquired a 68,000 square foot (unaudited) mixed use retail, office and residential building located at 131-137 Spring Street for $122.~~3 ~~million~~. Property We are currently in the process of analyzing the fair value of the in-place leases; and consequently, no value has yet been assigned to the leases. Therefore, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to change.Acquisitions

In2013 ~~December 2012, we acquired the aggregate 42,000 square foot (unaudited) vacant retail buildings located at 985-987 Third Avenue for $18.0 million.~~Acquisitions

In ~~October~~April ~~2012~~2013, we acquired interests from our joint venture partner, ~~along~~City ~~with~~Investment ~~Stonehenge~~Fund, ~~Partners~~or CIF, ~~acquired~~in a16 ~~99-year~~Court ~~leasehold~~Street ~~position~~for ~~covering~~$4.0 anmillion. 82We have consolidated the ownership of the 318,~~250~~000 square foot building. The transaction valued the consolidated interest at $96.2 million, inclusive of the $84.7 mortgage encumbering the property. We recognized a purchase price fair value adjustment of $(~~unaudited~~2.3), 96million ~~unit~~upon ~~residential~~the ~~building~~closing ~~located~~of atthis ~~1080~~transaction. ~~Amsterdam~~This ~~Avenue~~property, which we ~~plan~~initially toacquired ~~redevelop~~in ~~into~~July 2007, ~~luxury~~was ~~residential~~previously ~~units~~accounted for as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. We are currently in the process of analyzing the fair value of the investment. Therefore, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to change.

In ~~September~~March ~~2012~~2013, we, along with Magnum Real Estate Group, acquired ~~the~~84 ~~aggregate~~residential ~~267~~apartment units,~~000~~ ~~square~~consisting ~~foot~~of ~~(unaudited)~~72 ~~office~~apartment ~~buildings~~units and 12 townhouses, located at ~~635~~248-252 ~~and~~Bedford ~~641~~Avenue, ~~Sixth~~Williamsburg, ~~Avenue~~Brooklyn for $~~173~~54.9 million. Simultaneous with the closing, the joint venture closed on a five-year $22.0 million mortgage loan which carries a floating rate of interest of 225 basis points over LIBOR. The property sits on top of a commercial property already owned by us. We hold a 90% controlling interest in this joint venture.

~~In June~~ 2012, we acquired a 215,000 square foot (unaudited) office building located at 304 Park Avenue South for $135.0 million. The property was acquired with approximately $102.0 million in cash and $33.0 million in our units of limited partnership interest.Acquisitions

In ~~October~~December ~~2011~~2012, we ~~formed~~acquired a ~~joint venture with Stonehenge Partners and~~68,000 insquare ~~January 2012,~~foot wemixed ~~acquired~~use ~~five~~ retail ~~and two multifamily properties in Manhattan for $193.1 million~~, ~~inclusive~~office of our issuance of $47.6 million aggregate liquidation preference of 4.5% Series G preferred units of limited partnership interest. Simultaneous with the closing, we financed the multifamily component, which encompasses 385 units and ~~488,000~~residential ~~square~~building ~~feet~~located ~~(unaudited),~~at ~~with an aggregate 12~~131-~~year~~137 ~~$100.0~~Spring ~~million~~Street ~~fixed~~for ~~rate mortgage which bears interest at 4.125% and one of the retail properties financed with a five-year~~ $8122.53 million ~~fixed rate mortgage which bears interest at 3~~.~~75%. We hold an 80% interest in this joint venture which we consolidate as a VIE since we have been designated as the primary beneficiary.~~

15In December 2012, we acquired the aggregate 42,000 square foot vacant retail buildings located at 985-987 Third Avenue for $18.0 million.

~~Table~~In ofOctober 2012, ~~Contents~~we, along with Stonehenge Partners, acquired a 99-year leasehold position covering an 82,250 square foot, 96 unit residential building located at 1080 Amsterdam Avenue which we plan to redevelop into luxury residential units.

SLIn ~~Green~~September 2012, ~~Operating~~we ~~Partnership~~acquired the aggregate 267,000 Lsquare foot office buildings located at 635 and 641 Sixth Avenue for $173.P0 million.

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~15

~~(Unaudited)~~Table of Contents

~~March 31~~SL Green Operating Partnership, ~~2013~~L.P.

~~The~~Notes ~~following~~to ~~summarizes~~Consolidated ~~our~~Financial ~~allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these 2012 acquisitions (amounts in thousands):~~Statements

	635-641 Sixth Avenue		304 Park Avenue South		Stonehenge Properties
Land	$	69,848	$	54,189	$	65,533
Building and building leasehold	104,474		75,619		128,457
Above market lease value	—		2,824		594
Acquired in-place leases	7,727		8,265		9,573
Other assets, net of other liabilities	—		—		2,190
Assets acquired	182,049		140,897		206,347
Fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable	—		—		—
Below market lease value	9,049		5,897		13,239
Liabilities assumed	9,049		5,897		13,239
Purchase price allocation	$	173,000	$	135,000	$	193,108
Net consideration funded by us at closing	$	173,000	$	135,000	$	78,121
Equity and/or debt investment held	$	—	$	—	$	—
Debt assumed	$	—	$	—	$	—

June 30, 2013

~~4. Property Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale~~(unaudited)

In ~~February 2013~~June 2012, we, ~~along~~acquired ~~with~~a ~~our joint venture partner~~215,000 ~~sold~~square ~~our~~foot ~~property~~office building located at 44304 ~~West~~Park ~~55th Street~~Avenue South for $6135.30 million. WeThe ~~recognized~~property awas ~~gain~~acquired ofwith approximately $1102.10 million onin ~~the~~cash ~~sale~~and $33.0 million in our units of limited partnership interest.

In ~~February~~ October 2011, we formed a joint venture with Stonehenge Partners and, in January 2012, we ~~sold~~acquired five retail and two multifamily properties in Manhattan for $193.1 million, inclusive of our ~~leased~~issuance ~~fee~~of $47.6 million aggregate liquidation preference of 4.5% Series G preferred units of limited partnership interest. atSimultaneous ~~292~~with ~~Madison~~the ~~Avenue~~closing, ~~for~~we financed the multifamily component, which encompasses 385 units and 488,000 square feet, with an aggregate 12-year $85100.0 million. Wefixed ~~recognized~~rate amortgage ~~gain~~which bears interest at 4.125% and one of the retail properties financed with a five-year $68.65 million onfixed rate mortgage which bears interest at 3.75%. We hold an 80% interest in this joint venture, which we consolidate as a VIE since we have been designated as the ~~sale~~primary beneficiary.

~~Discontinued~~The ~~operations~~following ~~included~~summarizes ~~the~~our ~~results~~allocation of ~~operations~~the ofpurchase ~~real~~price ~~estate~~of the assets ~~sold~~acquired ~~prior~~and toliabilities ~~March 31,~~assumed ~~2013.~~upon ~~This~~the ~~included~~closing 44of ~~West~~these ~~55th Street,~~acquisitions ~~which was sold~~ (in ~~February 2013 and 292 Madison Avenue, which was sold in February 2012.~~thousands):

The following table summarizes income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (in thousands).

	248-252 Bedford Avenue		131-137 Spring Street		635-641 Sixth Avenue		304 Park Avenue South		Stonehenge Properties

Land	$	10,865	$	27,021	$	69,848	$	54,189	$	65,533
Building and building leasehold	44,035		105,342		104,474		75,619		128,457
Above market lease value	—		179		—		2,824		594
Acquired in-place leases	—		7,046		7,727		8,265		9,573
Other assets, net of other liabilities	—		—		—		—		2,190
Assets acquired	54,900		139,588		182,049		140,897		206,347

Fair value adjustment to mortgage note payable	—		—		—		—		—
Below market lease value	—		17,288		9,049		5,897		13,239
Liabilities assumed	—		17,288		9,049		5,897		13,239

Purchase price allocation	$	54,900	$	122,300	$	173,000	$	135,000	$	193,108

Net consideration funded by us at closing excluding consideration financed by debt	$	21,782	$	122,300	$	173,000	$	135,000	$	78,121
Equity and/or debt investment held	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Debt assumed	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Revenues
Rental revenue	$	(10	)	$	568
Escalation and reimbursement revenues	—			7
Other income	—			—
Total revenues	(10		)	575
Operating expenses	5			11
Real estate taxes	10			18
Interest expense, net of interest income	—			598
Transaction related costs	—			95
Depreciation and amortization	7			14
Total expenses	22			736
Net loss from discontinued operations	$	(32	)	$	(161	)

4. Property Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale

16In June 2013, we entered into an agreement to sell the property located at 333 West 34th, New York, New York for $220.3 million. This transaction closed on August 9, 2013.

~~Table~~In March 2013, we entered into an agreement to sell the property located at 300 Main Street, Stamford, Connecticut for $13.5 million. We recorded a $2.2 million impairment charge, in the second quarter of ~~Contents~~2013, in connection with the expected sale of this property. This transaction is expected to close during the third quarter of 2013.

SLIn ~~Green~~February ~~Operating~~2013, ~~Partnership~~we, Lalong with our joint venture partner, sold our property located at 44 West 55th Street for $6.P3 million. We recognized a gain of $1.1 million on the sale.

~~Notes~~In toFebruary ~~Consolidated~~2012, ~~Financial~~we ~~Statements~~sold our leased fee interest at 292 Madison Avenue for $85.0 million. We recognized a gain of $6.6 million on the sale.

~~(Unaudited)~~Discontinued operations included the results of operations of real estate assets under contract or sold prior to June 30, 2013. This included 300 Main Street and 333 West 34th Street, which were held for sale at June 30, 2013, 44 West 55th Street, which was sold in February 2013 and 292 Madison Avenue, which was sold in February 2012.

~~March 31, 2013~~16

~~5. Debt~~Table ~~and~~of ~~Preferred Equity Investments~~Contents

~~During~~SL ~~the~~Green ~~three~~Operating ~~months ended March 31~~Partnership, ~~2013 and 2012, our debt and preferred equity investments (net of discounts) increased approximately $208~~L.~~6 million and $76~~P.3 million, respectively, due to originations, purchases, accretion of discounts and paid-in-kind interest. We recorded repayments, participations and sales of approximately $121.9 million and $59.7 million, respectively, and loan loss reserves of zero and $3.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which offset the increases in debt and preferred equity investments.

AsNotes ofto ~~March 31,~~Consolidated ~~2013~~Financial ~~and December 31, 2012, we held the following debt investments with an aggregate weighted average current yield of approximately 11.1% at March 31, 2013 (in thousands):~~Statements

Loan Type	March 31, 2013 Senior Financing		March 31, 2013 Carrying Value, Net of Discounts			December 31, 2012 Carrying Value, Net of Discounts			Initial Maturity Date
Other Loan	$	399,500	$	15,000		$	—		March 2015
Mezzanine Loan	205,000		66,936			66,544			February 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	168,567		46,511			46,496			May 2016
Mezzanine Loan	177,000		15,644			15,906			May 2016
Junior Participation	133,000		49,000			49,000			June 2016
Mezzanine Loan	165,000		71,119			71,067			November 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(1)	1,109,000		73,292			115,804			March 2017
Other Loan	15,000		3,500			3,500			September 2021
Mortgage(2)	—		218,270			218,068			—
Total fixed rate	$	2,372,067	$	559,272		$	586,385
Junior Participation(3)	$	60,250	$	10,875		$	10,875		June 2013
Mezzanine Loan(4)	75,000		7,650			7,650			July 2013
Mezzanine Loan(5)	—		30,000			—			December 2013
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(6)	330,000		132,000			132,000			July 2014
Mezzanine Loan(7)	62,500		37,500			37,500			July 2014
Mezzanine Loan	170,000		60,000			60,000			August 2014
Mortgage	—		15,000			15,000			September 2014
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(8)	—		50,439			47,679			February 2015
Mezzanine Loan(9)	92,711		56,289			56,289			December 2015
Mezzanine Loan(10)	775,000		75,000			—			March 2016
Mezzanine Loan	55,000		35,000			35,000			July 2016
Mezzanine Loan(11)	81,000		35,202			34,940			October 2016
Total floating rate	$	1,701,461	$	544,955		$	436,933
Total	4,073,528		1,104,227			1,023,318
Loan loss reserve(3)	—		(7,000		)	(7,000		)
	$	4,073,528	$	1,097,227		$	1,016,318

June 30, 2013

(1)	Interest is added to the principal balance for this accrual only loan. In January 2013, we sold 50% of the mezzanine loan for $57.8 million and recognized additional income of $12.9 million, which is included in investment and preferred equity income on the consolidated statements of income. The unaccrued interest during the period in which the loan was on non-accrual status is being accrued as of January 2013.
(2)	In November 2012, we acquired this non-performing loan with an original balance of $219.0 million, which accrues interest at its default rate. This loan matured in June 2012.
(3)	Loan loss reserves are specifically allocated to investments. Our reserves reflect management’s judgment of the probability and severity of losses based on Level 3 data. We cannot be certain that our judgment will prove to be correct or that reserves will be adequate over time to protect against potential future losses.
(4)	In November 2011, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $7.4 million on a $15.0 million mortgage. Due to our continued involvement with the loan, the portion that was participated out has been recorded in other assets and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
(5)	In February 2013, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $30.0 million on a $100.0 million mortgage. The note has two one-year extension options.

(unaudited)

17The following table summarizes income from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively (in thousands).

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012		2013		2012
Revenues
Rental revenue	$	4,930		$	3,853	$	8,960	$	8,425
Escalation and reimbursement revenues	155			618		609		1,167
Other income	—			—		7		—
Total revenues	5,085			4,471		9,576		9,592
Operating expenses	1,542			1,488		2,983		2,866
Real estate taxes	284			313		578		614
Interest expense, net of interest income	167			166		331		930
Depreciable real estate reserves	2,150			—		2,150		—
Transaction related costs	3			—		3		95
Depreciation and amortization	1,617			1,605		3,211		3,156
Total expenses	5,763			3,572		9,256		7,661
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	$	(678	)	$	899	$	320	$	1,931

SL5. Debt ~~Green~~and ~~Operating~~Preferred ~~Partnership,~~Equity ~~L.P.~~Investments

~~Notes~~During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our debt and preferred equity investments (net of discounts and deferred origination fees) increased approximately $298.8 million and $159.1 million, respectively, due to ~~Consolidated~~originations, ~~Financial~~purchases, ~~Statements~~accretion of discounts and paid-in-kind interest. We recorded repayments, participations and sales of approximately $419.8 million and $159.8 million, respectively, and loan loss reserves of zero and $3.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which offset the increases in debt and preferred equity investments.

~~(Unaudited)~~Debt Investments

~~March~~ As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we held the following debt investments with an aggregate weighted average current yield of approximately 11.2% at June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

(6)	As part of the restructuring and refinancing of the related senior mortgage in July 2012, our outstanding investment in the amount of $49.9 million was repaid in full at maturity and we also entered into a loan participation in the amount of $182.0 million on the $462.0 million outstanding senior mortgage which maturity was extended to July 2014. In September 2012, we sold $50.0 million of our interest in the senior mortgage to a third party.
Loan Type		June 30, 2013 Senior Financing		June 30, 2013 Carrying Value, Net of Discounts and Deferred Origination Fees			December 31, 2012 Carrying Value, Net of Discounts and Deferred Origination Fees			Initial Maturity Date
(7)	In November 2012, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $5.0 million on a $37.5 million mortgage. As a result of the transfer not meeting the conditions for sale accounting, the portion that was participated out has been recorded in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Other Loan		$	398,500	$	14,820		$	—		March 2015
(8)	As of March 31, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $8.3 million in connection with this loan.
Mezzanine Loan		205,000		67,170			66,307			February 2016
(9)	As of March 31, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $28.7 million in connection with this loan.
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan		167,966		44,358			44,013			May 2016
(10)	In March 2013, we originated a $150.0 million junior mezzanine loan and simultaneously sold one-half of our interest at par.
Mezzanine Loan		177,000		15,436			15,906			May 2016
(11)	As of March 31, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $14.8 million in connection with this loan.
Junior Participation		133,000		49,000			49,000			June 2016
Mezzanine Loan		165,000		71,073			70,967			November 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(1)		1,109,000		75,602			115,804			March 2017
Other Loan		15,000		3,500			3,500			September 2021
Mortgage(2)		—		—			218,068			—
Total fixed rate		$	2,370,466	$	340,959		$	583,565
Mezzanine Loan(3)		—		29,826			—			December 2013
Junior Participation(4)(13)		57,750		10,863			10,869			February 2014
Junior Participation(5)		78,200		23,057			—			February 2014
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(6)		330,000		131,470			131,231			July 2014
Mezzanine Loan(7)		62,500		37,359			37,288			July 2014
Mezzanine Loan		180,000		59,812			59,739			August 2014
Mortgage		—		14,817			14,745			September 2014
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(8)		—		51,227			47,253			February 2015
Mezzanine Loan(9)		92,711		27,734			55,336			December 2015
Mezzanine Loan(10)		775,000		72,358			—			March 2016
Mezzanine Loan(11)		160,000		22,503			7,624			June 2016
Mezzanine Loan		87,300		25,572			34,761			July 2016
Mezzanine Loan(12)		83,933		35,563			34,444			October 2016
Total floating rate		$	1,907,394	$	542,161		$	433,290
Total		4,277,860		883,120			1,016,855
Loan loss reserve(13)		—		(7,000		)	(7,000		)
		$	4,277,860	$	876,120		$	1,009,855

~~Preferred Equity Investments~~17

AsTable of ~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we held the following preferred equity investments, with an aggregate weighted average current yield of approximately 11.4% at March 31, 2013 (in thousands):~~Contents

Type	March 31, 2013 Senior Financing		March 31, 2013 Carrying Value, Net of Discounts		December 31, 2012 Carrying Value, Net of Discounts		Initial Mandatory Redemption
Preferred equity(1)(2)	$	480,000	$	103,437	$	100,831	July 2014
Preferred equity	70,000		10,000		10,000		October 2014
Preferred equity(1)(3)	57,087		20,238		19,136		April 2016
Preferred equity(1)	926,260		212,932		210,918		July 2016
	$	1,533,347	$	346,607	$	340,885

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

(1)	The difference between the pay and accrual rates is included as an addition to the principal balance outstanding.
(2)	This investment was classified as held for sale at June 30, 2009, but as held-to-maturity for all periods subsequent to June 30, 2009. The reserve previously taken against this loan is being accreted up to the face amount through the maturity date. In connection with a recapitalization of the investment, our mezzanine loan was converted to preferred equity in 2011. We also made an additional $50.0 million junior preferred equity loan. This junior preferred equity loan was repaid at par in February 2012.
(3)	As of March 31, 2013, we are committed to fund an additional $5.7 million on this loan.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~The~~June ~~following table is a rollforward of our total loan loss reserves at March 31~~30, 2013 ~~and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):~~

	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Balance at beginning of year	$	7,000	$	50,175
Expensed	—		3,000
Recoveries	—		(2,436		)
Charge-offs and reclassifications	—		(43,739		)
Balance at end of period	$	7,000	$	7,000

(unaudited)

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all debt and preferred equity investments, other than as noted above, were performing in accordance with the terms of the loan agreements.

(1)		Interest is added to the principal balance for this accrual only loan. In January 2013, we sold 50% of the mezzanine loan for $57.8 million and recognized additional income of $12.9 million, which is included in investment and preferred equity income on the consolidated statements of income. The unaccrued interest during the period in which the loan was on non-accrual status is being accreted as of January 2013.
(2)		In November 2012, we acquired this non-performing loan with an original balance of $219.0 million, which accrued interest at its default rate. In connection with the repayment of the loan in May 2013, we recognized additional income of $6.4 million, which is included in investment and preferred equity income on our consolidated statements of income.
(3)		In February 2013, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $30.0 million on a $100.0 million mortgage. The note has two one-year extension options.
(4)		This loan matured in June 2013 and was extended to February 2014. The loan has an additional four-month extension option.
(5)		As of June 30, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $1.7 million in connection with this loan.
(6)		As part of the restructuring and refinancing of the related senior mortgage in July 2012, our outstanding investment in the amount of $49.9 million was repaid in full at maturity and we also entered into a loan participation in the amount of $182.0 million on the $462.0 million outstanding senior mortgage which maturity was extended to July 2014. In September 2012, we sold $50.0 million of our interest in the senior mortgage to a third party.
(7)		In November 2012, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $5.0 million on a $37.5 million mortgage. As a result of the transfer not meeting the conditions for sale accounting, the portion that was participated out has been recorded in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(8)		As of June 30, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $7.1 million in connection with this loan.
(9)		We funded $56.3 million at origination. In June 2013, we sold 50% of our interest in the $85 million mezzanine loan. As of June 30, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $13.6 million in connection with our share of this loan.
(10)		In March 2013, we originated a $150.0 million junior mezzanine loan and simultaneously sold one-half of our interest at par.
(11)		In November 2011, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $7.4 million on a $15.0 million mortgage. As part of the refinancing of the related senior mortgage in June 2013, we originated a $30.0 million mezzanine loan and our outstanding investment in the amount of $15.0 million, including the participated interest, was repaid in full. Following the refinancing, we entered into a loan participation agreement in the amount of $7.4 million on this $30.0 million mezzanine loan. Due to our continued involvement with the loan, the portion that was participated out has been recorded in other assets and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
(12)		As of June 30, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $14.1 million in connection with this loan.
(13)		Loan loss reserves are specifically allocated to investments. Our reserves reflect management’s judgment of the probability and severity of losses based on Level 3 data. We cannot be certain that our judgment will prove to be correct or that reserves will be adequate over time to protect against potential future losses.

WePreferred ~~have~~Equity determined that we have one portfolio segment of financing receivables at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 comprising commercial real estate, which is primarily recorded in debt and preferred equity investments. Included in other assets is an additional amount of financing receivables totaling approximately $129.0 million at March 31, 2013 and $121.3 million at December 31, 2012. No financing receivables were 90 days past due or on non-accrual status at March 31, 2013.Investments

18As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we held the following preferred equity investments, with an aggregate weighted average current yield of approximately 10.2% at June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

Table of Contents

Type

June 30,
2013
Senior
Financing

June 30,
2013
Carrying
Value, Net of
Discounts
and Deferred
Origination
Fees

December 31,
2012
Carrying
Value, Net of
Discounts
and Deferred
Origination
Fees

Initial
Mandatory
Redemption

Preferred equity

70,000

9,934

9,927

October 2014

Preferred equity(1)(2)

525,000

105,360

99,768

July 2015

Preferred equity(1)(3)

55,986

22,213

18,925

April 2016

Preferred equity(1)

926,260

213,794

209,959

July 2016

1,577,246

351,301

338,579

~~SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.~~18

~~Notes~~Table toof ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~Contents

~~(Unaudited)~~SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

~~March 31,~~Notes ~~2013~~to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~The~~June ~~following table presents impaired loans~~30, ~~which may include non-accrual loans, as of March 31,~~ 2013 ~~and December 31, 2012, respectively (in thousands):~~

	March 31, 2013						December 31, 2012
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	10,750		10,750		7,000		10,750		10,750		7,000
Total	$	10,750	$	10,750	$	7,000	$	10,750	$	10,750	$	7,000

(unaudited)

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans, which may include non-accrual loans and the related investment and preferred equity income recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (in thousands):

(1)		The difference between the pay and accrual rates is included as an addition to the principal balance outstanding.
(2)		The reserve previously taken against this loan is being accreted up to the face amount through the maturity date. In June 2013, the redemption date was extended from July 2014 to July 2015.
(3)		As of June 30, 2013, we were committed to fund an additional $3.6 million on this loan.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013		2012
Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	10,864	$	79,937
Investment and preferred equity income recognized	227		1,562

The following table is a rollforward of our total loan loss reserves at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

On an ongoing basis, we monitor the credit quality of our financing receivables based on payment activity. We assess credit quality indicators based on the underlying collateral.

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Balance at beginning of year	$	7,000	$	50,175
Expensed	—		3,000
Recoveries	—		(2,436		)
Charge-offs and reclassifications	—		(43,739		)
Balance at end of period	$	7,000	$	7,000

~~6. Investments~~At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all debt and preferred equity investments, other than as noted above, were performing in ~~Unconsolidated~~accordance ~~Joint~~with ~~Ventures~~the terms of the loan agreements.

We have ~~investments~~determined inthat ~~several~~we ~~real~~have ~~estate~~one ~~joint~~portfolio ~~ventures~~segment ~~with various partners, including The City Investment Fund, or CIF, SITQ Immobilier, a subsidiary~~ of ~~Caisse~~financing dereceivables ~~depot~~at etJune ~~placement du Quebec~~30, or2013 ~~SITQ,~~and ~~Canada~~December ~~Pension Plan Investment Board~~31, or2012 ~~CPPIB,~~comprising ~~Prudential~~commercial ~~Real~~real ~~Estate Investors~~estate, orwhich ~~Prudential,~~is ~~Onyx~~primarily ~~Equities,~~recorded orin ~~Onyx,~~debt ~~The Witkoff Group, or Witkoff, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, or Credit Suisse, Jeff Sutton, or Sutton, Harel Insurance~~ and ~~Finance,~~preferred orequity Harel, Louis Cappelli, or Cappelli, The Moinian Group, or Moinian, Vornado Realty Trust (NYSE: VNO), or Vornado, Blackstone Real Estate Partners VII, or Blackstone, Square Mile Capital Management LLC, or Square Mile, Plaza Global Real Estate Partners LP or Plaza, Angelo Gordon Real Estate Incinvestments., orIncluded ~~AG, as well as private investors. All the investments below are voting interest entities, except for 33 Beekman, 3 Columbus Circle and 180/182 Broadway which are VIEs~~ in ~~which~~other weassets ~~are~~is ~~not~~an ~~the~~additional ~~primary~~amount ~~beneficiary.~~of ~~Our~~financing ~~net~~receivables ~~equity~~totaling ~~investment~~approximately ~~in these three VIEs was~~ $~~124~~141.~~5 million and $117.~~7 million at ~~March 31~~June 30, 2013 and ~~December 31, 2012, respectively~~$121.3 Asmillion weat doDecember ~~not control the joint ventures listed below~~31, ~~we account for them under the equity method of accounting~~2012. WeNo ~~assess~~financing ~~the~~receivables ~~accounting~~were ~~treatment~~90 ~~for~~days ~~each~~past ~~joint~~due ~~venture~~or on ~~a stand~~non-~~alone~~accrual ~~basis.~~status This includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine which party has what rights and whether those rights are protective or participating. In situations where we and our partner are involved in some or all of the following: approving the annual budget, receiving a detailed monthly reporting package from us, meeting with us on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture, reviewing and approving the joint venture’s tax return before filing, and approving all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at ~~each~~June ~~property~~30, ~~we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights~~2013. Our joint venture agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan.

19The following table presents impaired loans, which may include non-accrual loans, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (in thousands):

Table of Contents

	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	10,750		10,750		7,000		10,750		10,750		7,000
Total	$	10,750	$	10,750	$	7,000	$	10,750	$	10,750	$	7,000

SLThe ~~Green~~following ~~Operating~~table ~~Partnership~~presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans, ~~L.P.~~which may include non-accrual loans and the related investment and preferred equity income recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively (in thousands):

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012

Average recorded investment in impaired loans	$	10,876	$	69,932	$	10,870	$	74,935

Investment and preferred equity income recognized	261		2,333		487		3,895

~~(Unaudited)~~On an ongoing basis, we monitor the credit quality of our financing receivables based on payment activity. We assess credit quality indicators based on the underlying collateral.

~~March 31,~~6. Investments ~~2013~~in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

~~The~~We ~~table~~have ~~below~~investments ~~provides~~in ~~general~~several ~~information~~real onestate ~~each~~joint ofventures ~~our~~with ~~joint~~various ~~ventures~~partners, asincluding SITQ Immobilier, a subsidiary of ~~March 31~~Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, ~~2013~~or ~~(amounts~~SITQ, inCanada ~~thousands~~Pension Plan Investment Board, or CPPIB, Prudential Real Estate Investors, or Prudential, Onyx Equities, or Onyx, The Witkoff Group, or Witkoff, Credit Suisse Securities (USA): LLC, or Credit Suisse, Jeff Sutton, or Sutton, Harel Insurance and Finance, or Harel, Louis Cappelli, or Cappelli, The Moinian Group, or Moinian, Vornado

Property	Partner	Ownership Interest		Economic Interest		Square Feet	Acquired	Acquisition Price($)(1)
100 Park Avenue	Prudential	49.90	%	49.90	%	834	02/00	95,800
21 West 34th Street	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	30	07/05	22,400
1604-1610 Broadway(14)	Onyx	90.00	%	90.00	%	30	11/05	4,400
27-29 West 34th Street	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	41	01/06	30,000
717 Fifth Avenue(2)	Sutton/Private Investor	10.92	%	10.92	%	120	09/06	251,900
800 Third Avenue	Private Investors	42.95	%	42.95	%	526	12/06	285,000
1745 Broadway	Witkoff/SITQ/Lehman Bros.	32.26	%	32.26	%	674	04/07	520,000
1 and 2 Jericho Plaza	Onyx/Credit Suisse	20.26	%	20.26	%	640	04/07	210,000
16 Court Street	CIF	35.00	%	35.00	%	318	07/07	107,500
The Meadows(3)	Onyx	50.00	%	50.00	%	582	09/07	111,500
388 and 390 Greenwich Street(4)	SITQ	50.60	%	50.60	%	2,600	12/07	1,575,000
180/182 Broadway(5)	Harel/Sutton	25.50	%	25.50	%	71	02/08	43,600
600 Lexington Avenue	CPPIB	55.00	%	55.00	%	304	05/10	193,000
11 West 34th Street	Private Investor/Sutton	30.00	%	30.00	%	17	12/10	10,800
7 Renaissance	Cappelli	50.00	%	50.00	%	37	12/10	4,000
3 Columbus Circle(7)	Moinian	48.90	%	48.90	%	769	01/11	500,000
280 Park Avenue(8)	Vornado	50.00	%	50.00	%	1,237	03/11	400,000
1552-1560 Broadway(9)	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	49	08/11	136,550
747 Madison Avenue	Harel/Sutton	33.33	%	33.33	%	10	09/11	66,250
724 Fifth Avenue	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	65	01/12	223,000
10 East 53rd Street	CPPIB	55.00	%	55.00	%	390	02/12	252,500
33 Beekman(10)	Harel/Private Investor	45.90	%	45.90	%	145	08/12	31,000
West Coast office portfolio(11)	Blackstone/SquareMile	36.01	%	36.01	%	4,474	09/12	880,103
521 Fifth Avenue(12)	Plaza	50.50	%	50.50	%	460	11/12	315,000
21 East 66th Street(13)	Private Investors	32.28	%	32.28	%	17	12/12	75,000
315 West 36th Street	Private Investors	35.50	%	35.50	%	148	12/12	45,000
Herald Center (6)	AG	40.00	%	40.00	%	365	01/13	50,000

~~(1) Acquisition~~Table ~~price~~of ~~represents the actual or implied gross purchase price for the joint venture.~~Contents

~~(2) In~~SL ~~June 2012,~~Green ~~this~~Operating ~~retail condominium was recapitalized. The recapitalization triggered a promote which resulted in a reduction of our economic interest. In addition~~Partnership, ~~we sold 50% of our remaining interest at a property valuation of $617~~L.~~6 million~~P. We recognized $67.9 million of additional cash income, equivalent to profit, due to the distribution of refinancing proceeds and a gain on sale of $3.0 million. The refinancing replaced the $245.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which bore interest at 275 basis points over LIBOR and was due to mature in September 2012, with a $300.0 million mortgage loan and $290.0 million mezzanine loan.

~~(3) In~~Notes ~~August 2012, Onyx made a capital contribution~~ to ~~the~~Consolidated ~~joint~~Financial ~~venture, which was distributed to us in full redemption of our preferred equity interest.~~Statements

~~(4) The~~June ~~property~~30, ~~is subject to a 13-year triple-net lease arrangement with a single tenant. The lease commenced in 2007.~~2013

(5unaudited) ~~In August 2011, the joint venture sold the property located at 63 Nassau Street for $2.8 million.~~

Realty Trust (6NYSE: VNO) ~~The~~, ~~joint~~or ~~venture~~Vornado, ~~acquired~~Blackstone aReal ~~preferred~~Estate ~~equity~~Partners ~~interest~~VII, inor anBlackstone, ~~entity~~Square ~~that~~Mile ~~holds~~Capital Management LLC, or Square Mile, Plaza Global Real Estate Partners LP or Plaza, Angelo Gordon Real Estate Inc., or AG, as well as private investors. All the investments below are voting interest inentities, aexcept ~~retail~~for ~~property~~33 ~~located~~Beekman, 3 Columbus Circle and 180/182 Broadway which are VIEs in ~~Manhattan~~which we are not the primary beneficiary. ~~The~~Our ~~preferred~~net equity ~~bears~~investment ~~interest~~in atthese athree ~~rate~~VIEs ofwas 8$133.~~75%~~4 ~~per~~million ~~annum~~ and ~~matures~~$117.7 inmillion at June ~~2016~~ 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. As we do not control the joint ventures listed below, we account for them under the equity method of accounting.

~~(7) We~~The ~~had~~table anbelow ~~obligation~~provides togeneral ~~fund~~information anon ~~additional~~each ~~$47.5~~of ~~million~~our ~~to the~~ joint ~~venture,~~ventures ~~of which $46.8 million has been funded~~ as of ~~March 31~~June 30, 2013. ~~This~~(amounts ~~liability is recorded~~ in accrued interest payable and other liabilities. In addition, we made a $125.0 million bridge loan to this joint venture which bore interest at a rate of 7.5%. This loan was repaid when the joint venture refinanced its debt in April 2011. In September 2012, the joint venture sold to Young & Rubicam, Inc. a portion of the property, generally floors three through eight, through a condominium form of ownership, or Y&R units, for $143.6 million. As the joint venture has an option to repurchase the Y&R unit, no gain was recognized as a result of this transaction. thousands):

(8) In March 2011, we contributed our debt investment with a carrying value of $286.6 million to a newly formed joint venture in which we hold a 50% interest. We realized $38.7 million of additional income upon the contribution. This income is included in preferred equity and investment income. The joint venture paid us approximately $111.3 million and also assumed $30.0 million of related floating rate financing which matures in June 2016. In May 2011, this joint venture took control of the underlying property as part of a recapitalization transaction which valued the investment at approximately $1.1 billion. We hold an effective 49.5% ownership interest in the joint venture.

Property	Partner	Ownership Interest		Economic Interest		Square Feet	Acquired	Acquisition Price($)(1)

100 Park Avenue	Prudential	49.90	%	49.90	%	834	02/00	95,800
21 West 34th Street	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	30	07/05	22,400
1604-1610 Broadway(14)	Onyx	70.00	%	70.00	%	30	11/05	4,400
27-29 West 34th Street	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	41	01/06	30,000
717 Fifth Avenue(2)	Sutton/Private Investor	10.92	%	10.92	%	120	09/06	251,900
800 Third Avenue	Private Investors	42.95	%	42.95	%	526	12/06	285,000
1745 Broadway	Witkoff/SITQ/Lehman Bros.	32.26	%	32.26	%	674	04/07	520,000
1 and 2 Jericho Plaza	Onyx/Credit Suisse	20.26	%	20.26	%	640	04/07	210,000
The Meadows(3)	Onyx	50.00	%	50.00	%	582	09/07	111,500
388 and 390 Greenwich Street(4)	SITQ	50.60	%	50.60	%	2,600	12/07	1,575,000
180/182 Broadway(5)	Harel/Sutton	25.50	%	25.50	%	71	02/08	43,600
600 Lexington Avenue	CPPIB	55.00	%	55.00	%	304	05/10	193,000
11 West 34th Street	Private Investor/Sutton	30.00	%	30.00	%	17	12/10	10,800
7 Renaissance	Cappelli	50.00	%	50.00	%	37	12/10	4,000
3 Columbus Circle(7)	Moinian	48.90	%	48.90	%	769	01/11	500,000
280 Park Avenue(8)	Vornado	50.00	%	50.00	%	1,237	03/11	400,000
1552-1560 Broadway(9)	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	49	08/11	136,550
747 Madison Avenue	Harel/Sutton	33.33	%	33.33	%	10	09/11	66,250
724 Fifth Avenue	Sutton	50.00	%	50.00	%	65	01/12	223,000
10 East 53rd Street	CPPIB	55.00	%	55.00	%	390	02/12	252,500
33 Beekman(10)	Harel/Private Investor	45.90	%	45.90	%	145	08/12	31,000
West Coast office portfolio(11)	Blackstone/SquareMile	36.01	%	36.01	%	4,067	09/12	880,103
521 Fifth Avenue(12)	Plaza	50.50	%	50.50	%	460	11/12	315,000
21 East 66th Street(13)	Private Investors	32.28	%	32.28	%	17	12/12	75,000
315 West 36th Street	Private Investors	35.50	%	35.50	%	148	12/12	45,000
Herald Center(6)	AG	40.00	%	40.00	%	365	01/13	50,000

(9) In connection with this acquisition, the joint venture also acquired a long-term leasehold interest in the retail space and certain other spaces at 1560 Broadway, which is adjacent to 1552 Broadway. The purchase price relates only to the purchase of the 1552 Broadway interest which comprises 13,045 square feet. In May 2012, we, along with Sutton, acquired the property at 155 West 46th Street for $8.4 million. In January 2013, we conveyed this property, which is adjacent to 1552 and 1560 Broadway, to the fee owner of 1560 Broadway.

(1)		Acquisition price represents the actual or implied gross purchase price for the joint venture.
(2)		In June 2012, the retail condominium at the property was recapitalized. The recapitalization triggered a promote which resulted in a reduction of our economic interest. In addition, we sold 50% of our remaining interest at a property valuation of $617.6 million. We recognized $67.9 million of additional cash income, equivalent to profit, due to the distribution of refinancing proceeds and a gain on sale of $3.0 million. The refinancing replaced the $245.0 million floating rate mortgage loan, which bore interest at 275 basis points over LIBOR and was due to mature in September 2012, with a $300.0 million mortgage loan and $290.0 million mezzanine loan.
(3)		In August 2012, Onyx made a capital contribution to the joint venture, which was distributed to us in full redemption of our preferred equity interest.
(4)		The property is subject to a 13-year triple-net lease arrangement with a single tenant. The lease commenced in 2007.
(5)		As of June 30, 2013, the redevelopment project is substantially complete.
(6)		The joint venture acquired a preferred equity interest in an entity that holds the interest in a mixed commercial use property located in Manhattan. The preferred equity bears interest at a rate of 8.75% per annum and matures in June 2016.
(7)		We had an obligation to fund an additional $47.5 million to the joint venture which has been fully funded as of June 30, 2013. In September 2012, the joint venture sold to Young & Rubicam, Inc. a portion of the property, generally floors three through eight, through a condominium form of ownership, or Y&R units, for $143.6 million. As the joint venture has an option to repurchase the Y&R unit, no gain was recognized as a result of this transaction.
(8)		We hold an effective 49.5% ownership interest in the joint venture.
(9)		In connection with this acquisition, the joint venture also acquired a long-term leasehold interest in the retail space and certain other spaces at 1560 Broadway, which is adjacent to 1552 Broadway. The purchase price relates only to the purchase of the 1552 Broadway interest which comprises 13,045 square feet. In May 2012, we, along with Sutton, acquired the property at 155 West 46th Street for $8.4 million. In January 2013, we conveyed this property, which is adjacent to 1552 and 1560 Broadway, to the fee owner of 1560 Broadway.

Table of Contents

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(Unaudited)~~June 30, 2013

~~March 31, 2013~~(unaudited)

(10) The joint venture acquired the fee interest in the property and will develop an approximately 30 story building for student housing. Upon completion of the development, the joint venture will convey a long-term ground lease condominium interest in the building to Pace University.

(10)		The joint venture acquired the fee interest in the property and will develop an approximately 30 story building for student housing. Upon completion of the development, the joint venture will convey a long-term ground lease condominium interest in the building to Pace University.
(11)		In September 2012, we, together with an affiliate of Blackstone, Gramercy Capital Corp., which in April 2013, changed its name to Gramercy Property Trust Inc. (NYSE: GPT), or Gramercy, and Square Mile, formed a joint venture to recapitalize a 31-property, 4.5-million-square-foot West Coast office portfolio. Following the recapitalization, Blackstone became the majority owner of the joint venture, with Equity Office Properties, a Blackstone affiliate, being responsible for the portfolio’s management and leasing. Prior to the recapitalization, the Company held $26.7 million in mezzanine and preferred equity positions in the entity that owned the portfolio. The new joint venture extended the $678.8 million mortgage secured by the portfolio for a term of two years with a one-year extension option. In addition, the joint venture entered into a new $68.0 million mezzanine loan for a term of two years. See Note 5, “Debt and Preferred Equity Investments.” In February 2013, we acquired Gramercy’s 10.73% interest in the joint venture and simultaneously sold 20.78% of the newly acquired interest to Square Mile. In June 2013, one of the properties was sold for $111.9 million, on which we recognized a gain of approximately $1.6 million. The proceeds of the sale were used primarily to repay $99.0 million of the mortgage and $7.3 million of the mezzanine loan.
(12)		In November 2012, we sold a 49.5% partnership interest in 521 Fifth Avenue to Plaza Global Real Estate Partners at a gross valuation price of $315.0 million for this property. We recognized a gain of $19.4 million on the sale. We also refinanced the existing $150.0 million loan with a $170.0 million seven-year mortgage loan, which bears interest at 220 basis points over LIBOR. Following the sale, we deconsolidated the entity effective November 30, 2012 and accounted for our investment under the equity method due to a lack of control.
(13)		We hold a 32.28% interest in three retail and two residential units at the property and a 16.14% in four residential units at the property.
(14)		In March 2013, Sutton conveyed his interest in this property to us.

~~(11)~~ In ~~September~~ July 2012, we, ~~together~~along with anour ~~affiliate of Blackstone, Gramercy Capital Corp., who in April 2013, changed its name to Gramercy Property Trust Inc. (NYSE: GPT), or Gramercy, and Square Mile, formed a~~ joint venture ~~to recapitalize a 31-property~~partner, ~~4.5-million-square-foot~~sold ~~West~~One ~~Coast~~Court ~~office~~Square ~~portfolio. Following the recapitalization, Blackstone became the majority owner of the joint venture, with Equity Office Properties, a Blackstone affiliate, being responsible~~ for ~~the portfolio’s management and leasing. Prior to the recapitalization, the Company held~~ $26481.71 million, inwhich ~~mezzanine~~included ~~and preferred equity positions in~~ the ~~entity~~assumption ~~that~~by ~~owned~~ the ~~portfolio.~~purchaser ~~The~~of ~~new joint venture extended the~~ $~~678~~315.80 million ~~mortgage secured by the portfolio for a term~~ of ~~two~~existing ~~years with a one-year extension option~~debt. InWe ~~addition,~~recognized ~~the joint venture entered into~~ a ~~new~~gain of $681.0 million ~~mezzanine~~on ~~loan for a term of two years. See Note 5, “Debt and Preferred Equity Investments.” In February 2013, we acquired Gramercy’s 10.73% interest in~~ the ~~joint~~sale ~~venture and simultaneously sold 20.78%~~ of ~~the~~this ~~newly acquired interest to Square Mile~~property.

~~(12)~~ In ~~November~~ April 2012, we, ~~sold~~along with our ~~49.5%~~joint ~~partnership~~venture ~~interest~~partner, inJeff ~~521~~Sutton, ~~Fifth~~sold ~~Avenue~~the toproperty ~~Plaza~~located ~~Global~~at ~~Real~~379 ~~Estate~~West ~~Partners~~Broadway for ~~a gross valuation price of~~ $~~315~~48.05 million, ~~for~~inclusive ~~this property. We recognized a gain~~ of ~~$19.4 million on~~ the ~~sale.~~fee Weposition ~~also~~which ~~refinanced~~was ~~the~~acquired ~~existing~~for $~~150~~13.05 million. ~~loan~~We ~~with~~recognized a ~~$170.0~~gain ~~million~~on ~~seven-year mortgage loan, which bears interest at 220 basis points over LIBOR. Following the~~ sale, weof ~~deconsolidated~~this ~~the entity effective November 30, 2012 and accounted our~~ investment ~~under the equity method because~~ of ~~lack~~$6.5 ~~of control~~million.

~~(13) We~~In ~~hold~~March a2012, ~~32.28%~~we, ~~interest~~along inwith our joint venture partner, Jeff Sutton, sold the ~~three~~property ~~retail~~located ~~and~~at ~~two~~141 ~~residential~~Fifth ~~units~~Avenue ~~and~~for a$46.0 16million.~~14%~~ inWe ~~four~~recognized ~~residential~~a ~~units~~gain on sale of this investment of $7.3 million.

~~(14) In March 2013, Sutton conveyed its interest to us.~~21

InTable ~~July 2012, we, along with our joint venture partner, sold One Court Square for $481.1 million, which included the assumption by the purchaser~~ of ~~$315.0 million of existing debt. We recognized a gain of $1.0 million on the sale of this property.~~Contents

InSL ~~April 2012,~~Green ~~we,~~Operating ~~along with our joint venture partner~~Partnership, ~~Jeff Sutton, sold the property located at 379 Broadway for $48~~L.~~5 million, inclusive of the fee position which was acquired for $13~~P.~~5 million. We recognized a gain on sale of this investment of $6.5 million.~~

InNotes ~~March 2012,~~to ~~we,~~Consolidated ~~along~~Financial ~~with our joint venture partner, Jeff Sutton, sold the property located at 141 Fifth Avenue for $46.0 million. We recognized a gain on sale of this investment of $7.3 million.~~Statements

21June 30, 2013

~~Table of Contents~~(unaudited)

SLWe ~~Green~~generally ~~Operating~~finance ~~Partnership~~our joint ventures with non-recourse debt. However, Lin certain cases we have provided guarantees or master leases for tenant space.P These guarantees and master leases terminate upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying loans. The first mortgage notes and other loans payable collateralized by the respective joint venture properties and assignment of leases at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were as follows (amounts in thousands):

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Property	Maturity Date	Interest Rate(1)		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
100 Park Avenue	09/2014	6.64	%	$	211,056	$	212,287
7 Renaissance	02/2015	10.00	%	950		856
11 West 34th Street	01/2016	4.82	%	17,349		17,491
280 Park Avenue	06/2016	6.57	%	710,000		710,000
21 West 34th Street	12/2016	5.76	%	100,000		100,000
1745 Broadway	01/2017	5.68	%	340,000		340,000
1 and 2 Jericho Plaza	05/2017	5.65	%	163,750		163,750
800 Third Avenue	08/2017	6.00	%	20,910		20,910
388 and 390 Greenwich Street(2)	12/2017	3.20	%	996,082		996,082
315 West 36th Street	12/2017	3.04	%	25,000		25,000
717 Fifth Avenue	07/2022	4.45	%	300,000		300,000
21 East 66th Street(3)	04/2023	3.60	%	12,000		12,000
717 Fifth Avenue	06/2024	9.00	%	299,122		294,509
1604-1610 Broadway(4)	—	5.66	%	27,000		27,000
Total fixed rate debt				$	3,223,219	$	3,219,885
180/182 Broadway(5)	12/2013	2.95	%	88,321		71,524
West Coast office portfolio(6)	09/2014	3.93	%	635,012		745,025
747 Madison Avenue	10/2014	3.00	%	33,125		33,125
The Meadows(7)	09/2015	7.75	%	57,000		57,000
3 Columbus Circle(8)	04/2016	2.38	%	243,277		247,253
1552 Broadway(9)	04/2016	3.23	%	131,848		113,869
Other loan payable	06/2016	1.10	%	30,000		30,000
724 Fifth Avenue	01/2017	2.55	%	120,000		120,000
10 East 53rd Street	02/2017	2.70	%	125,000		125,000
33 Beekman(10)	08/2017	2.95	%	18,362		18,362
600 Lexington Avenue	10/2017	2.28	%	122,514		124,384
388 and 390 Greenwich Street(2)	12/2017	1.19	%	142,297		142,297
27-29 West 34th Street(11)	05/2018	2.10	%	53,238		53,375
521 Fifth Avenue(12)	11/2019	2.40	%	170,000		170,000
21 East 66th Street	06/2033	1.90	%	1,996		2,033
16 Court Street(13)				—		84,916
Total floating rate debt				$	1,971,990	$	2,138,163
Total joint venture mortgages and other loans payable				$	5,195,209	$	5,358,048

(Unaudited)

(1)		Effective weighted average interest rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013, taking into account interest rate hedges in effect during the period.
(2)		These loans comprised of a $576.0 million mortgage and a $562.4 million mezzanine loan, both of which are fixed rate loans, except for $72.0 million of the mortgage and $70.3 million of the mezzanine loan which are floating. Up to $200.0 million of the mezzanine loan, secured indirectly by these properties, is recourse to us. We believe it is unlikely that we will be required to perform under this guarantee.
(3)		In April 2013, this loan was refinanced at par and its maturity was extended to April 2023.
(4)		This loan went into default in November 2009 due to the non-payment of debt service.
(5)		This loan has a committed amount of $90.0 million.
(6)		As a result of the sale of one of its properties, the joint venture paid down $99.0 million of its mortgage and $7.3 million of its mezzanine loan.
(7)		As a result of the refinancing and restructuring in August 2012, we replaced the $83.0 million mortgage with a $60.0 million, three-year mortgage and recognized additional income of $10.8 million due to the repayment of the previous mortgage at a discount. As of June 30, 2013, $3.0 million of the existing loan remained unfunded.
(8)		In April 2011, our joint venture with The Moinian Group which owns the property located at 3 Columbus Circle, New York, obtained a $260.0 million five-year mortgage with the Bank of China, which carries a floating rate of interest of 210 basis points over the 30-day LIBOR. The joint venture has the ability to increase the mortgage by $40.0 million based on meeting certain performance hurdles. In connection with this obligation, we executed a master lease agreement. Our partner has executed a contribution agreement to reflect its pro rata obligation under the master lease. In February 2012, the terms of the mortgage were modified to remove the Y&R condominium from the mortgage lien and from the existing master lease. See Note 7 of prior table.
(9)		In April 2013, we refinanced the previous $119.6 million mortgage with a $200.0 million three-year loan construction financing facility comprised of a $170.0 million mortgage loan, which carries a floating rate of interest of 270 basis points over LIBOR, and a $30.0 mezzanine loan, which carries a floating rate of interest of 935 basis points over LIBOR. The facility has two one-year extension options. As of June 30, 2013, $47.3 million of the mortgage loan and $20.9 million of the mezzanine loan remained unfunded.
(10)		This loan has a committed amount of $75.0 million, which is recourse to us. Our partner has indemnified us for its pro rata share of the recourse guarantee. A portion of the guarantee terminates upon the joint venture reaching certain milestones. We believe it is unlikely that we will be required to perform under this guarantee.
(11)		In May 2013, this loan was refinanced and its maturity was extended to May 2018.
(12)		In connection with the sale of a 49.5% membership interest in the entity, the existing loan was refinanced with a $170.0 million seven-year mortgage. As we no longer control the entity, we deconsolidated the entity effective November 30, 2012. See Note 12 of prior table.
(13)		In April 2013, we acquired interests from our joint venture partner, CIF, and have consolidated the entity due to our controlling interest.

~~March 31~~We act as the operating partner and day-to-day manager for all our joint ventures, except for 800 Third Avenue, 1 and 2 Jericho Plaza, 3 Columbus Circle and The Meadows. We are entitled to receive fees for providing management, leasing, construction supervision and asset management services to our joint ventures. We earned approximately $1.4 million, $4.0 million, $1.8 million and $3.7 million from these services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In addition, we have the ability to earn incentive fees based on the ultimate financial performance of certain of the joint venture properties.

We generally finance our joint ventures with non-recourse debt. However, in certain cases we have provided guarantees or master leases for tenant space. These guarantees and master leases terminate upon the satisfaction of specified circumstances or repayment of the underlying loans. The first mortgage notes and other loans payable collateralized by the respective joint venture properties and assignment of leases at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, are as follows (amounts in thousands):22

Property	Maturity Date	Interest Rate(1)		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
21 East 66th Street(11)	04/2013	5.63	%	$	12,000	$	12,000
100 Park Avenue	09/2014	6.64	%	211,673		212,287
7 Renaissance	02/2015	10.00	%	856		856
11 West 34th Street	01/2016	4.82	%	17,418		17,491
280 Park Avenue	06/2016	6.57	%	710,000		710,000
21 West 34th Street	12/2016	5.76	%	100,000		100,000
1745 Broadway	01/2017	5.68	%	340,000		340,000
1 and 2 Jericho Plaza	05/2017	5.65	%	163,750		163,750
800 Third Avenue	08/2017	6.00	%	20,910		20,910
388 and 390 Greenwich Street(2)	12/2017	3.20	%	996,082		996,082
315 West 36th Street	12/2017	3.04	%	25,000		25,000
717 Fifth Avenue	07/2022	4.45	%	300,000		300,000
717 Fifth Avenue	06/2024	9.00	%	296,803		294,509
1604-1610 Broadway(3)	—	5.66	%	27,000		27,000
Total fixed rate debt				$	3,221,492	$	3,219,885
27-29 West 34th Street(4)	05/2013	2.20	%	$	53,238	$	53,375
1552 Broadway(5)	08/2013	3.18	%	119,322		113,869
16 Court Street	10/2013	2.70	%	84,731		84,916
180/182 Broadway(6)	12/2013	2.96	%	76,862		71,524
West Coast office portfolio	09/2014	3.94	%	742,112		745,025
747 Madison Avenue	10/2014	3.00	%	33,125		33,125
The Meadows(7)	09/2015	7.75	%	57,000		57,000
3 Columbus Circle(8)	04/2016	2.41	%	245,275		247,253
Other loan payable	06/2016	1.10	%	30,000		30,000
724 Fifth Avenue	01/2017	2.56	%	120,000		120,000
10 East 53rd Street	02/2017	2.71	%	125,000		125,000
33 Beekman(9)	08/2017	2.96	%	18,362		18,362
600 Lexington Avenue	10/2017	2.31	%	123,454		124,384
388 and 390 Greenwich Street(2)	12/2017	1.36	%	142,297		142,297
521 Fifth Avenue(10)	11/2019	2.41	%	170,000		170,000
21 East 66th Street	06/2033	2.88	%	2,033		2,033
Total floating rate debt				$	2,142,811	$	2,138,163
Total mortgages and other loan payable				$	5,364,303	$	5,358,048

Table of Contents

~~(1) Effective~~SL ~~weighted~~Green ~~average~~Operating ~~interest rate for the three months ended March 31~~Partnership, ~~2013, taking into account interest rate hedges in effect during the period~~L.P.

~~(2) These~~Notes loans comprised of a $576.0 million mortgage and a $562.4 million mezzanine loan, both of which are fixed rate loans, except for $72.0 million of the mortgage and $70.3 million of the mezzanine loan which are floating. Up to ~~$200.0~~Consolidated ~~million~~Financial ~~of the mezzanine loan, secured indirectly by these properties, is recourse to us. We believe it is unlikely that we will be required to perform under this guarantee.~~Statements

~~(3) This~~June ~~loan~~30, ~~went into default in November 2009 due to the non-payment of debt service.~~ 2013

(4unaudited) ~~This loan was refinanced at maturity.~~

~~(5) This~~The ~~loan~~combined ~~has~~balance asheets ~~committed~~for ~~amount~~the ofunconsolidated ~~$125.0~~joint ~~million. In April 2013~~ventures, weat ~~refinanced~~June ~~the existing loan with a $200.0 million three-year loan comprised of a $170.0 million mortgage loan~~30, ~~which~~2013 ~~carries~~and aDecember ~~floating rate of interest of 270 basis points over LIBOR~~31, ~~and a $30.0 mezzanine loan~~2012, ~~which~~are ~~carries~~as afollows ~~floating~~(in ~~rate of interest of 9.35% over LIBOR. The loan has two one-year extension options.~~thousands):

(6) This loan has a committed amount of $90.0 million.

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Assets
Commercial real estate property, net	$	6,727,061	$	6,910,991
Other assets	853,956		728,113
Total assets	$	7,581,017	$	7,639,104

Liabilities and members’ equity
Mortgages and other loans payable	$	5,195,209	$	5,358,048
Other liabilities	377,491		406,929
Members’ equity	2,008,317		1,874,127
Total liabilities and members’ equity	$	7,581,017	$	7,639,104
Company’s net investment in unconsolidated joint ventures	$	1,085,793	$	1,032,243

~~(7) As~~The acombined ~~result~~statements of ~~the~~income ~~refinancing~~for ~~and~~the ~~restructuring~~unconsolidated injoint ~~August 2012,~~ventures wefor ~~replaced~~ the ~~existing loan with a $60.0 million,~~ three~~-year~~ ~~mortgage~~ and ~~recognized~~six ~~additional~~months ~~income~~ended ofJune ~~$10.8~~30, ~~million~~2013 ~~due~~and ~~to the repayment of the previous mortgage at a discount. As of March 31~~2012, ~~2013~~respectively, ~~$3.0~~are ~~million~~as offollows ~~the~~(in ~~existing loan remained unfunded.~~thousands):

(8) In April 2011, our joint venture with The Moinian Group which owns the property located at 3 Columbus Circle, New York, obtained a $260.0 million five-year mortgage with the Bank of China, which carries a floating rate of interest of 210 basis points over the 30-day LIBOR. The joint venture has the ability to increase the mortgage by $40.0 million based on meeting certain performance hurdles. In connection with this obligation, we executed a master lease agreement. Our partner has

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2013			2012		2013			2012
Total revenues	$	154,974		$	124,418	$	306,205		$	244,466
Operating expenses	28,205			16,207		56,816			32,973
Ground rent	658			742		1,315			1,660
Real estate taxes	16,958			12,483		34,263			25,857
Interest expense, net of interest income	56,561			50,602		112,968			105,470
Amortization of deferred financing costs	5,302			2,904		9,585			4,671
Depreciation and amortization	52,539			35,724		95,150			72,507
Transaction related costs	—			90		—			358
Total expenses	160,223			118,752		310,097			243,496
Net (loss) income	$	(5,249	)	$	5,666	$	(3,892	)	$	970
Company’s equity in net (loss) income of unconsolidated joint ventures	$	(3,761	)	$	70,890	$	1,313		$	69,330

22The 2012 equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures includes $67.9 million of additional income due to the distribution of refinancing proceeds from the recapitalization of 717 Fifth Avenue.

~~Table~~Gramercy ofProperty ~~Contents~~Trust Inc.

SLIn ~~Green~~April ~~Operating~~2004, ~~Partnership~~we formed Gramercy Capital Corp., Lwhich was renamed Gramercy Property Trust Inc.P in April 2013, or Gramercy, as a commercial real estate finance business. Gramercy qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and expects to qualify for its current fiscal year.

~~Notes~~At toJune ~~Consolidated~~30, ~~Financial~~2013, ~~Statements~~we held 0.7 million shares, or approximately 1.35% of Gramercy’s common stock. Our total investment of approximately $3.4 million is based on the market value of our common stock investment in Gramercy at June 30, 2013. As we no longer have any significant influence over Gramercy, we account for our investment as available-for-sale securities.

~~(Unaudited)~~Effective May 2005, June 2009 and October 2009, Gramercy entered into lease agreements with an affiliate of ours, for their corporate offices at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York. The first lease is for approximately 7,300 square feet and carries a term of ten years with rents of approximately $249,000 per annum for year one increasing to $315,000 per annum in year ten. The second lease is for approximately 900 square feet pursuant to a lease which ends in April 2015, with annual rent under this lease of approximately $35,300 per annum for year one increasing to $42,800 per annum in year six. The third lease is for approximately 1,400 square feet pursuant to a lease which ends in April 2015, with annual rent under this lease of approximately $67,300 per annum for year one increasing to $80,500 per annum in year six.

~~March 31, 2013~~23

~~executed~~Table ~~a contribution agreement to reflect its pro rata obligation under the master lease. In February 2012, the terms~~ of ~~the mortgage were modified to remove the Y&R condominium from the mortgage lien and from the existing master lease. See Note 7 of prior table.~~Contents

~~(9) This~~SL ~~loan~~Green ~~has~~Operating ~~a committed amount of $75.0 million~~Partnership, ~~which is recourse to us~~L. ~~Our partner has indemnified us for its pro rata share of the recourse guarantee~~P. ~~A portion of the guarantee terminates upon the joint venture reaching certain milestones. We believe it is unlikely that we will be required to perform under this guarantee.~~

~~(10) In~~Notes ~~connection~~to ~~with~~Consolidated ~~the~~Financial sale of our 49.5% membership interest in the entity, the existing loan was refinanced with a $170.0 million seven-year mortgage. As we no longer control the entity, we deconsolidated the entity effective November 30, 2012. See Note 12 of prior table.Statements

~~(11) In April~~June ~~2013~~30, ~~this loan was refinanced and its maturity was extended to April 2023. The new loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.6% per annum.~~2013

We act as the operating partner and day-to-day manager for all our joint ventures, except for 800 Third Avenue, 1 and 2 Jericho Plaza, 3 Columbus Circle and The Meadows. We are entitled to receive fees for providing management, leasing, construction supervision and asset management services to our joint ventures. We earned approximately $2.6 million and $1.9 million from these services for the three months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively. In addition, we have the ability to earn incentive fees based on the ultimate financial performance of certain of the joint venture properties.(unaudited)

~~The~~Effective ~~combined~~June 2012, ~~balance~~the ~~sheets~~first ~~for~~and ~~the~~third ~~unconsolidated~~leases ~~joint~~were ~~ventures,~~amended atand ~~March 31~~replaced with a new lease for approximately 8,100 ~~2013~~square ~~and~~feet ~~December~~pursuant to a lease which ends in April 312015, ~~2012~~with annual rent under this lease of approximately $345,000 ~~are~~for asyear ~~follows~~one (increasing to $357,000 in ~~thousands):~~year three.

	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Assets
Commercial real estate property, net	$	6,965,366	$	6,910,991
Other assets	789,684		728,113
Total assets	$	7,755,050	$	7,639,104
Liabilities and members’ equity
Mortgages and other loans payable	$	5,364,303	$	5,358,048
Other liabilities	405,820		406,929
Members’ equity	1,984,927		1,874,127
Total liabilities and members’ equity	$	7,755,050	$	7,639,104
Company’s net investment in unconsolidated joint ventures	$	1,073,130	$	1,032,243

Marc Holliday, SL Green’s chief executive officer, remains a board member of Gramercy.

~~The~~7. Deferred ~~combined statements of income for the unconsolidated joint ventures, from acquisition date through the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):~~Costs

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013		2012
Total revenues	$	151,231	$	120,048
Operating expenses	28,611		16,766
Ground rent	657		918
Real estate taxes	17,305		13,374
Interest, net of interest income	56,407		54,868
Depreciation and amortization	46,894		38,550
Transaction related costs	—		268
Total expenses	149,874		124,744
Net income (loss)	$	1,357	$	(4,696	)
Company’s equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures	$	5,073	$	(1,560	)

Deferred costs at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Gramercy Capital Corp.

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Deferred financing	$	149,212		$	152,596
Deferred leasing	292,346			285,931
	441,558			438,527
Less accumulated amortization	(195,500		)	(177,382		)
Deferred costs, net	$	246,058		$	261,145

~~In April 2004, SL Green formed Gramercy, as a commercial real estate finance business~~8. ~~Gramercy~~Mortgages ~~qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes~~ and ~~expects~~Other toLoans ~~qualify for its current fiscal year.~~Payable

AtThe ~~March 31,~~first ~~2013,~~mortgages weand ~~held~~other ~~0.7~~loans ~~million~~payable ~~shares,~~collateralized orby ~~approximately~~the ~~1.3%~~respective ofproperties ~~Gramercy’s~~and ~~common~~assignment ~~stock. Our total investment~~ of ~~approximately~~leases ~~$3.9 million is based on the market value of our common stock investment in Gramercy~~ at ~~March~~June 3130, 2013~~. As~~ weand noDecember 31, ~~longer~~2012, ~~have any significant influence over Gramercy~~respectively, wewere ~~account~~as ~~for~~follows ~~our~~(amounts ~~investment~~in ~~as available-for-sale securities.~~thousands):

Property	Maturity Date	Interest Rate(1)		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
220 East 42nd Street	11/2013	5.25	%	$	183,527	$	185,906
609 Partners, LLC(2)	07/2014	5.00	%	23		23
125 Park Avenue	10/2014	5.75	%	146,250		146,250
711 Third Avenue	06/2015	4.99	%	120,000		120,000
625 Madison Avenue	11/2015	7.22	%	123,340		125,603
500 West Putnam	01/2016	5.52	%	23,799		24,060
420 Lexington Avenue	09/2016	7.50	%	184,033		184,992
Landmark Square	12/2016	4.00	%	83,705		84,486
485 Lexington Avenue	02/2017	5.61	%	450,000		450,000
120 West 45th Street	02/2017	6.12	%	170,000		170,000
300 Main Street(8)	02/2017	5.75	%	11,500		11,500
762 Madison Avenue	02/2017	3.75	%	8,291		8,371
2 Herald Square	04/2017	5.36	%	191,250		191,250
885 Third Avenue	07/2017	6.26	%	267,650		267,650
Other loan payable(3)	09/2019	8.00	%	50,000		50,000
One Madison Avenue	05/2020	5.91	%	597,610		607,678
100 Church	07/2022	4.68	%	230,000		230,000
919 Third Avenue(4)	06/2023	5.12	%	500,000		500,000
400 East 57th Street	02/2024	4.13	%	70,000		70,000
400 East 58th Street	02/2024	4.13	%	30,000		30,000
1515 Broadway(5)	03/2025	3.93	%	900,000		—
Total fixed rate debt				$	4,340,978	$	3,457,769
Master repurchase(6)	09/2013	3.20	%	132,179		116,667
16 Court Street(9)	10/2013	3.44	%	84,580		—
180 Maiden Lane(7)	11/2016	2.40	%	266,994		271,215
248-252 Bedford Avenue	03/2018	2.45	%	22,000		—
1515 Broadway(5)	—	—		—		769,813
Total floating rate debt				$	505,753	$	1,157,695
Total mortgages and other loans payable				$	4,846,731	$	4,615,464

~~Table of Contents~~24

SLTable ~~Green~~of ~~Operating Partnership, L.P.~~Contents

~~Notes~~SL toGreen ~~Consolidated~~Operating ~~Financial~~Partnership, ~~Statements~~L.P.

~~(Unaudited)~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~March~~June 3130, 2013

Effective May 2005, June 2009 and October 2009, Gramercy entered into lease agreements with an affiliate of ours, for their corporate offices at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York. The first lease is for approximately 7,300 square feet and carries a term of ten years with rents of approximately $249,000 per annum for year one increasing to $315,000 per annum in year ten. The second lease is for approximately 900 square feet pursuant to a lease which ends in April 2015, with annual rent under this lease of approximately $35,300 per annum for year one increasing to $42,800 per annum in year six. The third lease is for approximately 1,400 square feet pursuant to a lease which ends in April 2015, with annual rent under this lease of approximately $67,300 per annum for year one increasing to $80,500 per annum in year six.(unaudited)

Effective June 2012, the first and third leases were amended and replaced with a new lease for approximately 8,100 square feet pursuant to a lease which ends in April 2015, with annual rent under this lease of approximately $345,000 for year one increasing to $357,000 in year three.

(1)		Effective weighted average interest rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013, taking into account interest rate hedges in effect during the period.
(2)		As part of an acquisition, we issued 63.9 million units of our 5.0% Series E preferred units of limited partnership interest, or the Series E units, with a liquidation preference of $1.00 per unit. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 63.8 million Series E units had been redeemed.
(3)		This loan is secured by a portion of a preferred equity investment.
(4)		We own a 51% controlling interest in the joint venture that is the borrower on this loan. This loan is non-recourse to us.
(5)		We have consolidated this investment since we acquired the remaining interest in this joint venture in April 2011. In April 2012, we refinanced the $447.2 million mortgage that was due in December 2014 with a $775.0 million seven-year mortgage, which carried interest at the rate equal to the greater of (a) 285 basis points over 90-day LIBOR or (b) 3.6% per annum. In February 2013, we refinanced the $775.0 million mortgage with a new $900.0 million 12-year mortgage, which carries a rate of interest of 3.93% per annum and realized a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $18.5 million, including a prepayment penalty of $7.6 million.
(6)		In September 2012, we entered into a Master Repurchase Agreement, or MRA, with a financial institution, with a maximum facility capacity of $175.0 million, under which we agreed to sell certain debt investments in exchange for cash with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the same debt investments at a certain date or on demand. The MRA’s interest rate is based on 1-month LIBOR plus 300 basis points. The MRA matures in September 2013, and has a one-year extension option.
(7)		In connection with this consolidated joint venture obligation, we executed a master lease agreement. Our partner has executed a contribution agreement to reflect its pro rata share of the obligation under the master lease.
(8)		This property is held for sale at June 30, 2013 and the related mortgage is included in the liabilities related to assets held for sale.
(9)		In April 2013, we acquired interests from our joint venture partner, CIF, and have consolidated the entity due to our controlling interest.

~~Marc~~At ~~Holliday~~June 30, SL2013 ~~Green’s~~and ~~chief~~December 31, ~~executive officer~~2012, ~~remains~~the agross ~~board~~book ~~member~~value of ~~Gramercy~~the properties and debt and preferred equity investments collateralizing the mortgages and other loans payable was approximately $8.0 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively.

79. ~~Deferred~~Corporate ~~Costs~~Indebtedness

~~Deferred costs at March 31, 2013 and December 31,~~ 2012 ~~consisted~~Credit ~~of the following (in thousands):~~Facility

	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
Deferred financing	$	148,662		$	152,596
Deferred leasing	289,678			285,931
	438,340			438,527
Less accumulated amortization	(186,322		)	(177,382		)
Deferred costs, net	$	252,018		$	261,145

In November 2012, we entered into a $1.6 billion credit facility, or the 2012 credit facility, which refinanced, extended and upsized the previous 2011 revolving credit facility. The 2012 credit facility consists of a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility, or the revolving credit facility, and a $400.0 million term loan, or the term loan facility. The revolving credit facility matures in March 2017 and includes two six-month extension options, subject to certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee of 10 basis points for each such extension. We also have an option, subject to customary conditions, without the consent of existing lenders, to increase the capacity under the revolving credit facility to $1.5 billion at any time prior to the maturity date for the revolving credit facility, by obtaining additional commitments from our current lenders and other financial institutions. The term loan facility matures on March 30, 2018.

8The 2012 credit facility bears interest at a spread over LIBOR ranging from (i) 100 basis points to 175 basis points for loans under the revolving credit facility and (ii) 115 basis points to 200 basis points for loans under the term loan facility, in each case based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. ~~Mortgages~~ At June 30, 2013, the applicable spread was 145 basis points for revolving credit facility and ~~Other~~165 ~~Loans~~basis ~~Payable~~points for the term loan facility. We are required to pay quarterly in arrears a 15 to 35 basis point fee on the unused balance of the commitments under the revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2013, the facility fee was 30 basis points. At June 30, 2013, we had approximately $91.6 million of outstanding letters of credit, $40.0 million borrowings under the revolving credit facility and $400.0 million outstanding under the term loan facility, with undrawn capacity of $1.2 billion under the 2012 credit facility.

~~The~~We, ~~first~~the ~~mortgages~~Company and ~~other~~ROP ~~loans~~are ~~payable~~all ~~collateralized~~borrowers byjointly ~~the~~and ~~respective~~severally ~~properties~~obligated ~~and~~under ~~assignment~~the of2012 ~~leases~~credit atfacility. ~~March 31,~~No ~~2013~~other ~~and~~subsidiary ~~December 31,~~of ~~2012,~~ours ~~respectively,~~is ~~were~~an asobligor ~~follows~~under ~~(amounts~~the in2012 ~~thousands):~~credit facility.

Property	Maturity Date	Interest Rate(1)		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
220 East 42nd Street	11/2013	5.25	%	$	184,698	$	185,906
609 Partners, LLC(2)	07/2014	5.00	%	23		23
125 Park Avenue	10/2014	5.75	%	146,250		146,250
711 Third Avenue	06/2015	4.99	%	120,000		120,000
625 Madison Avenue	11/2015	7.22	%	124,481		125,603
500 West Putnam	01/2016	5.52	%	23,930		24,060
420 Lexington Avenue	09/2016	7.50	%	184,612		184,992
Landmark Square	12/2016	4.00	%	84,097		84,486
485 Lexington Avenue	02/2017	5.61	%	450,000		450,000
120 West 45th Street	02/2017	6.12	%	170,000		170,000
300 Main Street	02/2017	5.75	%	11,500		11,500
762 Madison Avenue	02/2017	3.75	%	8,331		8,371
2 Herald Square	04/2017	5.36	%	191,250		191,250
885 Third Avenue	07/2017	6.26	%	267,650		267,650
Other loan payable(3)	09/2019	8.00	%	50,000		50,000
One Madison Avenue	05/2020	5.91	%	602,584		607,678
100 Church	07/2022	4.68	%	230,000		230,000
919 Third Avenue(4)	06/2023	5.12	%	500,000		500,000
400 East 57th Street	02/2024	4.13	%	70,000		70,000
400 East 58th Street	02/2024	4.13	%	30,000		30,000
1515 Broadway(5)	03/2025	3.93	%	900,000		—
Total fixed rate debt				$	4,349,406	$	3,457,769
Master repurchase(6)	09/2013	3.21	%	$	174,966	$	116,667
180 Maiden Lane(7)	11/2016	2.41	%	269,113		271,215
248-252 Bedford Avenue	03/2018	2.46	%	22,000		—
1515 Broadway(5)	—	—		—		769,813
Total floating rate debt				$	466,079	$	1,157,695
Total mortgages and other loans payable				$	4,815,485	$	4,615,464

The 2012 credit facility includes certain restrictions and covenants (see Restrictive Covenants below).

242011 Revolving Credit Facility

~~Table~~The 2012 credit facility replaced our $1.5 billion revolving credit facility, or the 2011 revolving credit facility, which was terminated concurrently with the entering into the 2012 credit facility. The 2011 revolving credit facility bore interest at a spread over LIBOR ranging from 100 basis points to 185 basis points, based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long-term indebtedness of ~~Contents~~ROP, and required us to pay quarterly in arrears a 17.5 to 45 basis point facility fee on the total commitments under the 2011 revolving credit facility. The 2011 revolving credit facility included certain restrictions and covenants and, as of the time of the termination of the 2011 revolving credit facility and as of November 2012, we were in compliance with all such restrictions and covenants.

~~SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.~~25

~~Notes~~Table toof ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~Contents

~~(Unaudited)~~SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

~~March 31,~~Notes ~~2013~~to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~(1) Effective weighted average interest rate for the three months ended March~~June 3130, 2013~~, taking into account interest rate hedges in effect during the period.~~

(2unaudited) As part of an acquisition, we issued 63.9 million units of our 5.0% Series E preferred units of limited partnership interest, or the Series E units, with a liquidation preference of $1.00 per unit. As of March 31, 2013, 63.8 million Series E units had been redeemed.

~~(3) This~~Senior ~~loan~~Unsecured ~~is secured by a portion of a preferred equity investment.~~Notes

~~(4) We~~The ~~own~~following atable ~~51%~~sets ~~controlling~~forth ~~interest~~our insenior ~~the~~unsecured ~~joint~~notes ~~venture~~and ~~that~~other isrelated ~~the~~disclosures ~~borrower~~as onof ~~this~~June 30, ~~loan.~~2013 ~~This~~and ~~loan~~December 31, is2012, ~~non-recourse~~respectively toby ~~us.~~scheduled maturity date (amounts in thousands):

(5) We have consolidated this investment since we acquired the remaining interest in this joint venture in April 2011. In April 2012, we refinanced the $447.2 million mortgage that was due in December 2014 with a $775.0 million seven-year mortgage, which carried interest at the rate equal to the greater of (a) 285 basis points over 90-day LIBOR or (b) 3.6% per annum. In February 2013, we refinanced the $775.0 million mortgage with a new $900.0 million 12-year mortgage, which carries a rate of interest of 3.93% per annum and realized a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $18.5 million, including a prepayment penalty of $7.6 million.

Issuance	June 30, 2013 Unpaid Principal Balance		June 30, 2013 Accreted Balance		December 31, 2012 Accreted Balance		Coupon Rate(1)		Effective Rate		Term (in Years)	Maturity
August 13, 2004(2)(3)	$	75,898	$	75,898	$	75,898	5.88	%	5.88	%	10	August 15, 2014
March 31, 2006(2)(3)	255,308		255,185		255,165		6.00	%	6.00	%	10	March 31, 2016
October 12, 2010(4)	345,000		292,511		287,373		3.00	%	3.00	%	7	October 15, 2017
August 5, 2011(5)	250,000		249,651		249,620		5.00	%	5.00	%	7	August 15, 2018
March 16, 2010(5)	250,000		250,000		250,000		7.75	%	7.75	%	10	March 15, 2020
November 15, 2012(5)	200,000		200,000		200,000		4.50	%	4.50	%	10	December 1, 2022
June 27, 2005(2)(6)	7		7		7		4.00	%	4.00	%	20	June 15, 2025
March 26, 2007(7)	11,953		11,953		16,893		3.00	%	3.00	%	20	March 30, 2027
	$	1,388,166	$	1,335,205	$	1,334,956

(6) In September 2012, we entered into a Master Repurchase Agreement, or MRA, with a financial institution, with a maximum facility capacity of $175.0 million, under which we agreed to sell certain debt investments in exchange for cash with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the same debt investments at a certain date or on demand. The MRA’s interest rate is based on 1-month LIBOR plus 300 basis points. The MRA matures in September 2013, and has a one-year extension option.

(1)		Interest on the senior unsecured notes is payable semi-annually with principal and unpaid interest due on the scheduled maturity dates.
(2)		Issued by ROP.
(3)		On December 27, 2012, we repurchased $42.4 million of aggregate principal amount of these notes, consisting of $22.7 million of the 5.875% Notes and $19.7 million of the 6.0% Notes, for a total consideration of $46.4 million and realized a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $3.8 million.
(4)		In October 2010, we issued $345.0 million of these exchangeable notes. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The notes had an initial exchange rate representing an exchange price that was set at a 30.0% premium to the last reported sale price of SL Green’s common stock on October 6, 2010, or $85.81. The initial exchange rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The current exchange rate is 11.6800 shares of SL Green’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of these notes. The notes are our senior unsecured obligations and are exchangeable upon the occurrence of specified events and during the period beginning on the twenty-second scheduled trading day prior to the maturity date and ending on the second business day prior to the maturity date, into cash or a combination of cash and shares of SL Green’s common stock, if any, at our option. The notes are guaranteed by ROP. On the issuance date, $78.3 million of the debt balance was recorded in equity. As of June 30, 2013, approximately $52.5 million remained to be amortized into the debt balance.
(5)		Issued by us, the Company and ROP, as co-obligors.
(6)		Exchangeable senior debentures which are currently callable at par. In addition, the debentures can be put to ROP, at the option of the holder at par plus accrued and unpaid interest, on June 15, 2015 and 2020 and upon the occurrence of certain change of control transactions. As a result of the acquisition of all outstanding shares of common stock of Reckson, or the Reckson Merger, the adjusted exchange rate for the debentures is 7.7461 shares of SL Green’s common stock per $1,000 of principal amount of debentures and the adjusted reference dividend for the debentures is $1.3491. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we repurchased $650,000 of these bonds at par.
(7)		In March 2007, we issued $750.0 million of these exchangeable notes. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually on March 30 and September 30. The notes have an initial exchange rate representing an exchange price that was set at a 25.0% premium to the last reported sale price of SL Green’s common stock on March 20, 2007, or $173.30. The initial exchange rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Operating Partnership and are exchangeable upon the occurrence of specified events and during the period beginning on the twenty-second scheduled trading day prior to the maturity date and ending on the second business day prior to the maturity date, into cash or a combination of cash and shares of SL Green’s common stock, if any, at our option. The notes are currently redeemable at our option. We may be required to repurchase the notes on March 30, 2017 and 2022, and upon the occurrence of certain designated events. On March 30, 2012, we repurchased $102.2 million of aggregate principal amount of the exchangeable notes pursuant to a mandatory offer to repurchase the notes. On the issuance date, $66.6 million was recorded in equity and was fully amortized into the debt balance as of March 31, 2012. On January 2, 2013, we repurchased $4.9 million of aggregate principal amount of exchangeable notes at 99.6% of the principal amount.

~~(7) In~~Restrictive connection with this consolidated joint venture obligation, we executed a master lease agreement. Our partner has executed a contribution agreement to reflect its pro rata share of the obligation under the master lease.Covenants

AtThe ~~March 31,~~terms ~~2013~~of the 2012 credit facility and ~~December 31~~certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, ~~2012~~among other things, ~~the~~SL ~~gross~~Green’s ~~book~~ability ~~value~~to pay dividends, make certain types of ~~the~~investments, ~~properties~~incur additional indebtedness, incur liens and ~~debt~~enter into negative pledge agreements and ~~preferred~~dispose ~~equity~~of ~~investments~~assets, ~~collateralizing~~and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the ~~mortgages~~minimum ~~and~~amount ~~other~~of ~~loans~~tangible ~~payable~~net ~~was~~worth, ~~approximately~~a ~~$7.8~~maximum ~~billion~~ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and $7a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value.6 ~~billion~~The dividend restriction referred to above provides that SL Green will not during any time when a default is continuing, ~~respectively.~~make distributions with respect to its common stock or other equity interests, except to enable SL Green to continue to

~~9. Corporate Indebtedness~~26

~~2012~~Table ~~Credit~~of ~~Facility~~Contents

InSL ~~November 2012,~~Green weOperating ~~entered into a $1.6 billion credit facility~~Partnership, ~~or the 2012 credit facility, which refinanced, extended and upsized the previous 2011 revolving credit facility~~L. ~~The 2012 credit facility consists of a $1~~P.2 billion revolving credit facility, or the revolving credit facility, and a $400.0 million term loan, or the term loan facility. The revolving credit facility matures in March 2017 and includes two six-month extension options, subject to certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee of 10 basis points for each such extension. We also have an option, subject to customary conditions, without the consent of existing lenders, to increase the capacity under the revolving credit facility to $1.5 billion at any time prior to the maturity date for the revolving credit facility, by obtaining additional commitments from our current lenders and other financial institutions. The term loan facility matures on March 30, 2018.

~~The~~Notes ~~2012 credit facility bears interest at a spread over LIBOR ranging from (i) 100 basis points~~ to ~~175~~Consolidated ~~basis~~Financial points for loans under the revolving credit facility and (ii) 115 basis points to 200 basis points for loans under the term loan facility, in each case based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. At March 31, 2013, the applicable spread was 145 basis points for revolving credit facility and 165 basis points for the term loan facility. We are required to pay quarterly in arrears a 15 to 35 basis point fee on the unused balance of the commitments under the revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2013, the facility fee was 30 basis points. At March 31, 2013, we had approximately $91.9 million of outstanding letters of credit, $30.0 million borrowings under the revolving credit facility and $400.0 million outstanding under the term loan facility, with undrawn capacity of $1.2 billion under the 2012 credit facility.Statements

WeJune 30, ~~the Company and ROP are all borrowers jointly and severally obligated under the 2012 credit facility. No other subsidiary of ours is an obligor under the 2012 credit facility.~~2013

~~The 2012 credit facility includes certain restrictions and covenants~~ (~~see Restrictive Covenants below~~unaudited).

~~2011~~qualify ~~Revolving~~as ~~Credit~~a ~~Facility~~REIT for Federal income tax purposes. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

~~The~~Junior ~~2012~~Subordinate ~~credit~~Deferrable ~~facility~~Interest replaced our $1.5 billion revolving credit facility, or the 2011 revolving credit facility, which was terminated concurrently with the entering into the 2012 credit facility. The 2011 revolving credit facility bore interest at a spread over LIBOR Debentures

25In June 2005, we and SL Green issued $100.0 million in unsecured floating rate trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust, SL Green Capital Trust I, or the Trust, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary. The proceeds from the security offering were transferred to us as a loan. The securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% for the first ten years ending July 2015. Interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if we exercise our right to defer such payments. The trust preferred securities are redeemable, at our option, in whole or in part, with no prepayment premium. We do not consolidate the Trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary. Because the Trust is not consolidated, we have recorded the debt on our balance sheet and the related payments are classified as interest expense.

~~Table~~Principal ~~of Contents~~Maturities

SLCombined ~~Green~~aggregate ~~Operating~~principal ~~Partnership~~maturities of mortgages and other loans payable, ~~L.P.~~revolving credit facility, trust preferred securities, term loan and senior unsecured notes and our share of joint venture debt as of June 30, 2013, including as-of-right extension options, were as follows (in thousands):

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	Scheduled Amortization		Principal Repayments		Revolving Credit Facility		Trust Preferred Securities		Term Loan and Senior Unsecured Notes		Total		Joint Venture Debt
2013	$	20,431	$	399,101	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	419,532	$	73,574
2014	43,665		146,273		—		—		75,898		265,836		326,019
2015	46,322		229,537		—		—		7		275,866		37,328
2016	56,836		516,576		—		—		255,185		828,597		593,802
2017	60,897		1,098,064		—		—		304,464		1,463,425		934,011
Thereafter	367,307		1,861,722		40,000		100,000		1,099,651		3,468,680		180,587
	$	595,458	$	4,251,273	$	40,000	$	100,000	$	1,735,205	$	6,721,936	$	2,145,321

Consolidated interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, was comprised of the following (~~Unaudited~~in thousands):

March 31, 2013

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Interest expense	$	83,746		$	82,560		$	165,369		$	162,941
Interest income	(470		)	(401		)	(922		)	(811		)
Interest expense, net	$	83,276		$	82,159		$	164,447		$	162,130
Interest capitalized	$	3,301		$	2,996		$	6,363		$	5,532

~~ranging from 100 basis points to 185 basis points, based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP, and required us to pay quarterly in arrears a 17~~10.5 Fair toValue ~~45 basis point facility fee on the total commitments under the 2011 revolving credit facility. The 2011 revolving credit facility included certain restrictions and covenants and, as~~ of ~~the~~Financial ~~time of the termination of the 2011 revolving credit facility and as of November 2012, we were in compliance with all such restrictions and covenants.~~Instruments

~~Senior~~The ~~Unsecured~~following ~~Notes~~disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies as discussed in Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies.” Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

~~The~~Cash ~~following~~and ~~table~~cash ~~sets~~equivalents, ~~forth~~restricted ~~our~~cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable balances reasonably approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items. Mortgages and other loans payable, junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures and the senior unsecured notes ~~and~~had ~~other~~an estimated fair value based on discounted cash flow models, based on Level 3 inputs, of approximately $6.2 billion, compared to the book value of the related ~~disclosures~~fixed asrate debt of ~~March~~approximately $5.8 billion at June 3130, 2013. Our ~~and~~floating ~~December 31~~rate debt, inclusive of our 2012 credit facility, ~~respectively~~other bythan ~~scheduled~~the ~~maturity~~$30.0 ~~date~~million ~~(amounts~~that inwas ~~thousands):~~swapped, had an estimated fair value based on discounted cash flow models, based on Level 3 inputs, of approximately $0.9 billion, compared to the book value of the related floating rate debt of approximately $0.9 billion at June 30, 2013. Our debt and preferred equity investments had an estimated fair value ranging between $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, compared to the book value of the related debt and preferred equity investments of approximately $1.2 billion at June 30, 2013, based on Level 3 inputs.

Issuance	March 31, 2013 Unpaid Principal Balance		March 31, 2013 Accreted Balance		December 31, 2012 Accreted Balance		Coupon Rate(1)		Effective Rate		Term (in Years)	Maturity
August 13, 2004(2)(3)	$	75,898	$	75,898	$	75,898	5.88	%	5.88	%	10	August 15, 2014
March 31, 2006(2)(3)	255,308		255,175		255,165		6.00	%	6.02	%	10	March 31, 2016
October 12, 2010(4)	345,000		289,919		287,373		3.00	%	7.13	%	7	October 15, 2017
August 5, 2011(5)	250,000		249,636		249,620		5.00	%	5.03	%	7	August 15, 2018
March 16, 2010(5)	250,000		250,000		250,000		7.75	%	7.75	%	10	March 15, 2020
November 15, 2012(5)	200,000		200,000		200,000		4.50	%	4.50	%	10	December 1, 2022
June 27, 2005(2)(6)	7		7		7		4.00	%	4.00	%	20	June 15, 2025
March 26, 2007(7)	11,953		11,953		16,893		3.00	%	3.00	%	20	March 30, 2027
	$	1,388,166	$	1,332,588	$	1,334,956

~~(1) Interest~~Table onof ~~the senior unsecured notes is payable semi-annually with principal and unpaid interest due on the scheduled maturity dates.~~Contents

~~(2) Issued~~SL byGreen ~~ROP~~Operating Partnership, L.P.

(3) On December 27, 2012, we repurchased $42.4 million of aggregate principal amount of these notes, consisting of $22.7 million of the 5.875% Notes ~~and~~to ~~$19.7~~Consolidated ~~million~~Financial ~~of the 6.0% Notes, for a total consideration of $46.4 million and realized a net loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $3.8 million.~~Statements

(4) In October 2010, we issued $345.0 million of these exchangeable notes. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The notes had an initial exchange rate representing an exchange price that was set at a June 30~~.0% premium to the last reported sale price of SL Green’s common stock on October 6~~, 2010, or $85.81. The initial exchange rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The current exchange rate is 11.6800 shares of SL Green’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of these notes. The notes are our senior unsecured obligations and are exchangeable upon the occurrence of specified events and during the period beginning on the twenty-second scheduled trading day prior to the maturity date and ending on the second business day prior to the maturity date, into cash or a combination of cash and shares of SL Green’s common stock, if any, at our option. The notes are guaranteed by ROP. On the issuance date, $78.3 million of the debt balance was recorded in equity. As of March 31, 2013~~, approximately $55.1 million remained to be amortized into the debt balance.~~

(5unaudited) ~~Issued by us, the Company and ROP, as co-obligors.~~

~~(6) Exchangeable~~Disclosure ~~senior~~about ~~debentures~~fair ~~which~~value ~~are~~of ~~currently~~financial ~~callable~~instruments atis ~~par.~~based Inon ~~addition,~~pertinent ~~the~~information ~~debentures~~available ~~can be put~~ to ~~ROP,~~us atas ~~the option~~ of ~~the holder at par plus accrued and unpaid interest, on~~ June 1530, ~~2015~~2013. Although ~~and~~we ~~2020~~are ~~and~~not ~~upon~~aware ~~the occurrence~~ of ~~certain~~any ~~change~~factors ofthat ~~control~~would ~~transactions.~~significantly Asaffect ~~a result of~~ the ~~acquisition~~reasonable offair ~~all~~value ~~outstanding shares of common stock of Reckson~~amounts, orsuch ~~the~~amounts ~~Reckson~~have ~~Merger,~~not ~~the~~been ~~adjusted~~comprehensively ~~exchange~~revalued ~~rate~~ for ~~the~~purposes ~~debentures is 7.7461 shares~~ of SLthese ~~Green’s~~financial ~~common~~statements ~~stock~~since ~~per~~that ~~$1,000~~date ofand ~~principal~~current ~~amount~~estimates of ~~debentures~~fair ~~and~~value ~~the~~may ~~adjusted~~differ ~~reference~~significantly ~~dividend~~from ~~for~~ the ~~debentures~~amounts ispresented $1herein.~~3491. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we repurchased $650,000 of these bonds at par.~~

~~(7) In March 2007, we issued $750~~11.~~0 million of these exchangeable notes.~~ ~~Interest~~Related onParty these notes is payable semi-annually on March 30 and September 30. The notes have an initial exchange rate representing an exchange price that was set at a 25.0% premium to the last reported sale price of SL Green’s common stock on March 20, 2007, or $173.30. The initial exchange rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Operating Partnership and are exchangeable upon the occurrence of specified events and during the period beginning on the twenty-second scheduled trading day prior to the maturity date and ending on the second business day prior to the maturity date, into cash or a combination of cash and shares of SL Green’s common stock, if any, at our option. The notes are currently redeemable at our option. We may be required to repurchase the notes on March 30, 2017 and 2022, and upon the occurrence of certain designated events. On March 30, 2012, we repurchased $102.2 million of aggregate principal amount of the exchangeable notes pursuant to a mandatory offer to repurchase the notes. On the issuance date, $66.6 million was recorded in equity and was fully amortized into the debt balance as of March 31, 2012. On January 2, 2013, we repurchased $4.9 million of aggregate principal amount of exchangeable notes at 99.6% of the principal amount.Transactions

~~Restrictive~~Cleaning/ ~~Covenants~~Security/ Messenger and Restoration Services

~~The~~Through ~~terms~~Alliance ofBuilding ~~the~~Services, ~~2012~~or ~~credit~~Alliance, ~~facility~~First Quality Maintenance, L.P., or First Quality, provides cleaning, extermination and related services, Classic Security LLC provides security services, Bright Star Couriers LLC provides messenger services and Onyx Restoration Works provides restoration services with respect to certain properties owned by us. Alliance is partially owned by Gary Green, a son of Stephen L. Green, the chairman of SL Green’s board of directors. In addition, First Quality has the non-exclusive opportunity to provide cleaning and related services to individual tenants at our ~~senior~~properties ~~unsecured~~on ~~notes~~a ~~include~~basis separately negotiated with any tenant seeking such additional services. The Service Corporation has entered into an arrangement with Alliance whereby it will receive a profit participation above a certain ~~restrictions~~threshold for services provided by Alliance to certain tenants at certain buildings above the base services specified in their lease agreements. Alliance paid the Service Corporation approximately $0.9 million, $1.9 million, $0.8 million and ~~covenants~~$1.6 ~~which~~million ~~may~~for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We paid Alliance approximately $4.2 million, $8.4 million, $4.7 million and $8.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for these services (excluding services provided directly to tenants).

26Marketing Services

~~Table~~A-List Marketing, LLC, or A-List, provides marketing services to us. Ms. Deena Wolff, a sister of ~~Contents~~Mr. Marc Holliday, is the owner of A-List. The aggregate amount of fees we paid to A-List for these marketing services was approximately $105,000, $107,000, $44,200 and $55,900 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

~~SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.~~Leases

~~Notes~~Nancy Peck and Company leases 1,003 square feet of space at 420 Lexington Avenue under a lease that ends in August 2015. Nancy Peck and Company is owned by Nancy Peck, the wife of Stephen L. Green. The rent due pursuant to ~~Consolidated~~the ~~Financial~~lease ~~Statements~~was $35,516 per annum for year one increasing to $40,000 in year seven.

~~(Unaudited)~~Management Fees

~~March~~S.L. Green Management Corp., a consolidated entity, receives property management fees from an entity in which Stephen L. Green owns an interest. The aggregate amount of fees paid to S.L. Green Management Corp. from such entity was approximately $96,000, $214,000, $110,000 and $199,000 for the three and six months ended June 3130, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

limit, among other things, SL Green’s ability to pay dividends, make certain types of investments, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the minimum amount of tangible net worth, a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value. The dividend restriction referred to above provides that SL Green will not during any time when a default is continuing, make distributions with respect to its common stock or other equity interests, except to enable SL Green to continue to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants.Other

~~Junior~~Amounts ~~Subordinate~~due ~~Deferrable~~to/ ~~Interest~~from ~~Debentures~~related parties at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following (in thousands):

In June 2005, we and SL Green issued $100.0 million in unsecured floating rate trust preferred securities through a newly formed trust, SL Green Capital Trust I, or the Trust, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary. The proceeds from the security offering were transferred to us as a loan. The securities mature in 2035 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% for the first ten years ending July 2015. Interest payments may be deferred for a period of up to eight consecutive quarters if we exercise our right to defer such payments. The trust preferred securities are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, with no prepayment premium. We do not consolidate the Trust even though it is a variable interest entity as we are not the primary beneficiary. Because the Trust is not consolidated, we have recorded the debt on our balance sheet and the related payments are classified as interest expense.

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Due from joint ventures	$	1,777	$	511
Other	5,068		7,020
Related party receivables	$	6,845	$	7,531
Due to a joint venture (included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses)	$	—	$	(8,401	)

~~Principal~~Gramercy ~~Maturities~~Property Trust Inc.

~~Combined~~See ~~aggregate~~Note ~~principal~~6, ~~maturities~~“Investments ofin ~~mortgages~~Unconsolidated ~~and~~Joint ~~other~~Ventures—Gramercy ~~loans~~Property ~~payable, revolving~~Trust ~~credit facility~~Inc.,” ~~trust~~for ~~preferred~~disclosure ~~securities,~~on ~~term~~related ~~loan~~party ~~and~~transactions ~~senior~~between ~~unsecured~~Gramercy ~~notes~~ and ~~our share of joint venture debt as of March 31, 2013, including as-of-right extension options, were as follows (in thousands):~~us.

	Scheduled Amortization		Principal Repayments		Revolving Credit Facility		Trust Preferred Securities		Term Loan and Senior Unsecured Notes		Total		Joint Venture Debt
2013	$	30,878	$	357,308	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	388,186	$	185,130
2014	43,668		146,273		—		—		75,898		265,839		364,191
2015	46,325		229,537		—		—		7		275,869		36,886
2016	56,839		516,667		—		—		255,175		828,681		527,682
2017	60,897		1,098,064		—		—		301,872		1,460,833		933,612
Thereafter	367,307		1,861,722		30,000		100,000		1,099,636		3,458,665		151,642
	$	605,914	$	4,209,571	$	30,000	$	100,000	$	1,732,588	$	6,678,073	$	2,199,143

12. Capital

~~Consolidated~~The ~~interest~~Company ~~expense~~is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and at June 30, ~~excluding~~2013 ~~capitalized~~owned ~~interest~~91,812,771 ~~was~~general ~~comprised~~and oflimited partnership interests in the ~~following~~Operating (Partnership. Partnership interests in ~~thousands~~the Operating Partnership are denominated as “common units of limited partnership interest” (also referred to as “OP Units”): or “preferred units of partnership interest” (also referred to as “Preferred Units”). All references to OP Units and Preferred Units outstanding exclude such units held by the Company. A holder of an OP Unit may present such OP Unit to the Operating Partnership for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Interest expense	$	81,789		$	80,547
Interest income	(453		)	(410		)
Interest expense, net	$	81,336		$	80,137
Interest capitalized	$	3,062		$	2,536

~~10. Fair~~Table ~~Value~~ of ~~Financial Instruments~~Contents

~~The~~SL ~~following~~Green ~~disclosures~~Operating ~~of estimated fair value were determined by management~~Partnership, ~~using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies as discussed in Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies~~L.~~” Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value~~P. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

~~Cash~~Notes ~~and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable balances reasonably approximate their fair values due~~ to ~~the~~Consolidated ~~short~~Financial maturities of these items. Mortgages and other loans payable, junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures and the senior unsecured notes had an estimated fair value based on discounted cash flow models, based on Level 3 inputs, ofStatements

27June 30, 2013

~~Table of Contents~~(unaudited)

SLthe ~~Green~~issuance of OP Units to particular holders that may restrict such right for a period of time, generally one year from issuance). Upon presentation of an OP Unit for redemption, the Operating Partnership must redeem such OP Unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of common stock of the Company, Lexcept that the Company may, at its election, in lieu of a cash redemption, acquire such OP Unit for one share of common stock.P Because the number of shares of common stock outstanding at all times equals the number of OP Units that the Company owns, one share of common stock is generally the economic equivalent of one OP Unit, and the quarterly distribution that may be paid to the holder of an OP Unit equals the quarterly dividend that may be paid to the holder of a share of common stock. Each series of Preferred Units makes a distribution that is set in accordance with an amendment to the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership. Preferred Units may also be convertible into OP Units at the election of the holder thereof or the Company, subject to the terms of such Preferred Units.

~~Notes~~In July 2011, we, along with SL Green, entered into an “at-the-market” equity offering program, or ATM Program, to ~~Consolidated~~sell ~~Financial~~an ~~Statements~~aggregate of $250.0 million of SL Green’s common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, SL Green sold approximately 95,000 shares of its common stock through the ATM Program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $8.7 million ($8.5 million of net proceeds after related expenses). The net proceeds were used to repay debt, fund new investments and for other corporate purposes. The net proceeds from these offerings were contributed to us in exchange for 95,000 common partnership units. As of June 30, 2013, $36.7 million of common stock remained available for issuance under the ATM Program.

Net income (~~Unaudited~~loss) allocated to the preferred unitholders and limited unitholders reflects their pro-rata share of net income (loss) and distributions.

~~March 31,~~Limited ~~2013~~Partner Units

~~approximately~~As ~~$6.3 billion, compared to the book value~~ of ~~the related fixed rate debt of approximately $5.8 billion at March~~June 3130, 2013~~. Our floating rate debt~~, ~~inclusive~~limited ofpartners ~~our~~other ~~2012~~than ~~credit~~SL ~~facility,~~Green ~~but~~owned ~~excluding~~approximately ~~$30~~2.095%% ~~million of which was swapped~~(2, ~~had an estimated fair value based on discounted cash flow models~~794,239 ~~based~~units) ~~on Level 3 inputs,~~ of ~~approximately $0.9 billion, compared to~~ the ~~book~~Operating ~~value of the related floating rate debt of approximately $0~~Partnership.9 ~~billion~~At ~~at March~~June 3130, 2013., ~~Our~~2,851,906 ~~debt~~shares ~~and~~of ~~preferred~~the ~~equity~~Company’s ~~investments~~common ~~had~~stock anwere ~~estimated~~reserved ~~fair~~for ~~value ranging between $1.4 billion and $1.5 billion, compared to~~ the ~~book~~conversion ~~value~~ of ~~the~~units ~~related debt and preferred equity investments~~ of ~~approximately~~limited ~~$1.4~~partnership ~~billion~~interest atin ~~March 31,~~the ~~2013,~~Operating ~~based on Level 3 inputs~~Partnership.

~~Disclosure~~Preferred about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to us as of March 31, 2013. Although we are not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the reasonable fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.Units

11We have 9,200,000 units of our 6.50% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units of limited partnership interest, or the Series I Preferred Units, outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. The Series I Preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.625 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. ~~Related~~SL ~~Party~~Green ~~Transactions~~is entitled to redeem its corresponding 6.50% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at par for cash at its option on or after August 10, 2017, at which time an equal number of Series I Preferred Units would simultaneously be redeemed. In August 2012, SL Green received $221.9 million in net proceeds from the issuance of the Series I Preferred Units which were recorded net of underwriters’ discount and issuance costs. Net proceeds from SL Green’s offering of Series I Preferred Stock were contributed to us by SL Green in exchange for 9.2 million Series I Preferred Units.

~~Cleaning/~~In ~~Security/~~June 2013, ~~Messenger~~SL Green redeemed the remaining 7,700,000 outstanding shares of its 7.625% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, or the Series C Preferred Stock, at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus $0.3495 in accumulated and ~~Restoration~~unpaid ~~Services~~dividends on such Preferred Stock through June 21, 2013. We recognized $12.2 million of costs to redeem the remaining Series C Preferred Stock. In September 2012, SL Green had redeemed 4,000,000 shares of its 11,700,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus $0.3707 in accumulated and unpaid dividends on such preferred stock through September 24, 2012. We recognized $6.3 million of costs to redeem partially the Series C Preferred Stock. Simultaneously with each redemption, an equal number of our Series C Preferred Units were redeemed at the redemption price paid by SL Green to the Series C Preferred stockholders. The Series C Preferred unitholders received annual dividends of $1.90625 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions were cumulative, subject to certain provisions.

~~Through~~In ~~Alliance Building Services~~July 2012, orSL ~~Alliance,~~Green ~~First~~redeemed ~~Quality~~all ~~Maintenance~~4, ~~L.P.~~000,000 orshares ~~First~~of ~~Quality,~~its ~~provides~~7.875% ~~cleaning,~~Series D ~~extermination~~Cumulative ~~and~~Redeemable ~~related~~Preferred ~~services~~Stock, ~~Classic~~or ~~Security~~Series D ~~LLC~~Preferred ~~provides security services~~Stock, ~~Bright~~at ~~Star~~a ~~Couriers~~redemption ~~LLC~~price ~~provides~~of ~~messenger~~$25.00 ~~services,~~per ~~and~~share ~~Onyx~~plus ~~Restoration~~$0.4922 ~~Works~~in ~~provides~~accumulated ~~restoration~~and ~~services~~unpaid ~~with~~dividends ~~respect~~on tosuch ~~certain~~Preferred ~~properties~~Stock ~~owned~~through ~~by us. Alliance is partially owned by Gary Green~~July 14, a2012 ~~son~~and ofrecognized ~~Stephen L~~$3.7 ~~Green,~~million ~~the chairman~~ of SLcosts ~~Green’s~~to ~~board~~redeem ~~of directors. In addition, First Quality has~~ the ~~non-exclusive~~Series D ~~opportunity~~Preferred toStock. ~~provide~~Simultaneously ~~cleaning~~with ~~and~~that ~~related~~redemption, ~~services~~an toequal ~~individual~~number ~~tenants~~of at our ~~properties on a basis separately negotiated with any tenant seeking such additional services~~7. ~~The~~875% ~~Service~~Series D ~~Corporation~~Cumulative ~~has~~Redeemable ~~entered~~Preferred ~~into~~Units anwere ~~arrangement~~redeemed ~~with Alliance whereby it will receive a profit participation above a certain threshold for services provided by Alliance to certain tenants~~ at ~~certain buildings above~~ the ~~base~~redemption ~~services~~price ~~specified~~paid inby ~~their~~SL ~~lease~~Green ~~agreements. Alliance~~to ~~paid~~ the ~~Service~~Series D ~~Corporation~~Preferred ~~approximately $1~~stockholders.0 ~~million~~The ~~and $0.8 million for the three months ended March~~Series ~~31,~~D ~~2013~~Preferred ~~and~~unitholders ~~2012,~~received ~~respectively. We~~annual ~~paid~~dividends ~~Alliance~~of ~~approximately~~ $4.1 ~~million and $3~~.596875 ~~million~~per ~~for~~unit ~~the~~paid ~~three~~on ~~months~~a ~~ended~~quarterly ~~March 31,~~basis ~~2013~~ and ~~2012,~~distributions ~~respectively~~were cumulative, ~~for~~subject ~~these services (excluding services provided directly~~ to ~~tenants)~~certain provisions.

~~Marketing~~We ~~Services~~also have 22,658 units of our 5.00% Series E Preferred Units of limited partnership interest outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference of $1.00 per unit which are included and further described in Note 8, “Mortgages and other loans payable.”

A-List Marketing, LLC, or A-List, provides marketing services to us. Ms. Deena Wolff, a sister of Mr. Marc Holliday, is the owner of A-List. The aggregate amount of fees we paid to A-List for these marketing services was approximately $2,400 and $11,700 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.29

~~Leases~~Table of Contents

~~Nancy~~SL ~~Peck~~Green ~~and~~Operating ~~Company leases 1~~Partnership,~~003~~ ~~square feet of space at 420 Lexington Avenue under a lease that ends in August 2015. Nancy Peck and Company is owned by Nancy Peck, the wife of Stephen~~ L. ~~Green~~P. ~~The rent due pursuant to the lease was $35,516 per annum for year one increasing to $40,000 in year seven.~~

~~Management~~Notes ~~Fees~~to Consolidated Financial Statements

S.L. Green Management Corp., a consolidated entity, receives property management fees from an entity in which Stephen L. Green owns an interest. The aggregate amount of fees paid to S.L. Green Management Corp. from such entity was approximately $118,200 and $89,000 for the three months ended MarchJune 3130, 2013 ~~and 2012, respectively.~~

~~Other~~(unaudited)

~~Amounts~~In ~~due~~November 2011, ~~from/to~~as ~~related~~part ~~parties~~of atan ~~March 31~~acquisition, ~~2013~~we ~~and~~issued ~~December~~80,000 6.00% Series 31H Preferred Units of limited partnership interest, ~~2012~~or ~~consisted~~the Series H Preferred Units with a mandatory liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. The Series H Preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.50 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. The Series H Preferred Units may be redeemed at any time at par for cash at our option or the ~~following~~option ~~(in~~of ~~thousands):~~the unitholder.

	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Due from joint ventures	$	4,032	$	511
Other	7,137		7,020
Related party receivables	$	11,169	$	7,531
Due to a joint venture (included in Accounts payable and accrued expenses)	$	—	$	(8,401	)

In January 2012, as part of an acquisition, we issued 1,902,000 4.5% Series G Preferred Units of limited partnership interest, or the Series G Preferred Units, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. The Series G Preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.125 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. The Series G Preferred Units are convertible into a number of our common units of limited partnership interest equal to (i) the liquidation preference plus accumulated and unpaid distributions on the conversion date divided by (ii) $88.50. The Series G Preferred Units also provide the holder with the right to require us to repurchase the Series G Preferred Units for cash before January 31, 2022.

28We also have 60 units of our Series F Preferred Units outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference of $1,000.00 per unit.

~~Table~~Dividend ofReinvestment ~~Contents~~and Stock Purchase Plan

In March 2012, SL Green ~~Operating~~filed ~~Partnership~~a registration statement with the SEC for its dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan, Lor DRIP, which automatically became effective upon filing.P SL Green registered 3,500,000 shares of its common stock under the DRIP. The DRIP commenced on September 24, 2001.

~~Notes~~During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, SL Green issued approximately 312 shares and 1.3 million shares of its common stock and received approximately $26,000 and $99.5 million of proceeds, respectively, from dividend reinvestments and/or stock purchases under the DRIP. The $26,000 in proceeds received during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was contributed to ~~Consolidated~~us ~~Financial~~by ~~Statements~~SL Green in exchange for an equivalent number of common units of limited partnership interest. DRIP shares may be issued at a discount to the market price.

~~(Unaudited)~~Third Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

~~March~~SL Green has a stock option and incentive plan. The Third Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or the 2005 Plan, was approved by SL Green’s board of directors in April 312013 and SL Green’s stockholders in June 2013 at SL Green’s annual meeting of stockholders. The 2005 Plan authorizes the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, unrestricted and restricted stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards. Subject to adjustments upon certain corporate transactions or events, awards with respect to up to a maximum of 17,130,000 fungible units may be granted under the 2005 Plan. Currently, different types of awards count against the limit on the number of fungible units differently, with (1) full-value awards (i.e., those that deliver the full value of the award upon vesting, such as restricted stock) counting as 2.76 fungible units per share subject to such award (2) stock options, stock appreciation rights and other awards that do not deliver full value and expire five year from the date of grant counting as 0.77 fungible units per share subject to such awards, and (3) all other awards (e.g., ten-year stock options) counting as 1.0 fungible units per share subject to such award. Awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to the approval of the second amendment and restatement in June 2010 and third amendment and restatement in June 2013 continue to count against the fungible unit limit based on the ratios that were in effect at the time such awards were granted, which may be different than the current ratios. As a result, depending on the types of awards issued, the 2005 Plan may result in the issuance of more or less than 17,130,000 shares. If a stock option or other award granted under the 2005 Plan expires or terminates, the common stock subject to any portion of the award that expires or terminates without having been exercised or paid, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance of additional awards. Shares of SL Green’s common stock distributed under the 2005 Plan may be treasury shares or authorized but unissued shares. Currently, unless the 2005 Plan has been previously terminated by SL Green’s board of directors, new awards may be granted under the 2005 Plan until June 13, 2023, which is the tenth anniversary of the date that the 2005 Plan was most recently approved by SL Green’s stockholders. As of June 30, 2013, 5.8 million fungible units were available for issuance under the 2005 Plan after reserving for shares underlying outstanding restricted stock units, phantom stock units granted pursuant to SL Green’s Non-Employee Directors’ Deferral Program and LTIP Units, including, among others, outstanding LTIP Units issued under SL Green’s 2011 Long-Term Outperformance Plan, which remain subject to performance-based vesting.

~~Gramercy~~Options ~~Capital~~are ~~Corp~~granted under the plan at the fair market value on the date of grant and, subject to termination of employment, generally expire ten years from the date of grant, are not transferable other than on death, and generally vest in one to five years commencing one year from the date of grant.

~~See Note 6, “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures — Gramercy Capital Corp.,” for disclosure on related party transactions between Gramercy and us.~~30

~~12.~~Table ~~Capital~~of Contents

~~The~~SL ~~Company~~Green ~~is the sole general partner of the~~ Operating Partnership ~~and at March 31~~, ~~2013 owned 91,555,082 general and limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership~~L. Partnership interests in the Operating Partnership are denominated as “common units of limited partnership interest” (also referred to as “OP Units”) or “preferred units of partnership interest” (also referred to as “Preferred Units”)P. All references to OP Units and Preferred Units outstanding exclude such units held by the Company. A holder of an OP Unit may present such OP Unit to the Operating Partnership for redemption at any time (subject to restrictions agreed upon at the issuance of OP Units to particular holders that may restrict such right for a period of time, generally one year from issuance). Upon presentation of an OP Unit for redemption, the Operating Partnership must redeem such OP Unit for cash equal to the then value of a share of common stock of the Company, except that the Company may, at its election, in lieu of a cash redemption, acquire such OP Unit for one share of common stock. Because the number of shares of common stock outstanding at all times equals the number of OP Units that the Company owns, one share of common stock is generally the economic equivalent of one OP Unit, and the quarterly distribution that may be paid to the holder of an OP Unit equals the quarterly dividend that may be paid to the holder of a share of common stock. Each series of Preferred Units makes a distribution that is set in accordance with an amendment to the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership. Preferred Units may also be convertible into OP Units at the election of the holder thereof or the Company, subject to the terms of such Preferred Units.

InNotes ~~July 2011, we, along with SL Green, entered into an “at-the-market” equity offering program, or ATM Program,~~ to ~~sell~~Consolidated anFinancial ~~aggregate of $250.0 million of SL Green’s common stock. As of March 31, 2013, $45.4 million of common stock remained available for issuance under the ATM Program.~~Statements

~~Net~~June 30, ~~income (loss) allocated to the preferred unitholders and limited unitholders reflects their pro-rata share of net income (loss) and distributions.~~2013

~~Limited Partner Units~~(unaudited)

AsThe offair ~~March 31,~~value ~~2013,~~of ~~limited~~each ~~partners~~stock ~~other~~option ~~than~~granted SLis ~~Green~~estimated ~~owned~~on ~~approximately~~the ~~2.75%~~date ~~(2,585,675~~of ~~units)~~grant ofusing the ~~Operating~~Black-Scholes ~~Partnership.~~option Atpricing ~~March 31,~~model ~~2013,~~based ~~2,602,342~~on ~~shares~~historical ofinformation with the ~~Company’s~~following ~~common~~weighted ~~stock~~average ~~were~~assumptions ~~reserved~~ for ~~the~~grants ~~conversion~~during ofthe ~~units~~six ofmonths ~~limited~~ended ~~partnership~~June 30, ~~interest~~2013 inand the ~~Operating~~year ~~Partnership~~ended December 31, 2012.

Preferred Units

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Dividend yield	2.00	%	2.00	%
Expected life of option	4.7 years		3.7 years
Risk-free interest rate	0.68	%	0.46	%
Expected stock price volatility	35.50	%	37.40	%

WeA ~~have~~summary ~~9,200,000 units~~ of ~~our 6.50% Series I cumulative redeemable preferred units of limited partnership interest, or~~ the ~~Series I~~status ~~preferred units, outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference~~ of ~~$25.00 per unit. The Series I preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.625 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to certain provisions.~~ SL Green’s ~~is entitled to redeem its corresponding 6.50% Series I cumulative redeemable preferred~~ stock atoptions ~~par~~as ~~for~~of ~~cash at its option on or after August~~June 1030, ~~2017,~~2013 atand ~~which time an equal number of Series~~December I31, ~~preferred units would simultaneously be redeemed. In August~~ 2012, SLand ~~Green~~changes ~~received~~during ~~$221.9 million in net proceeds from~~ the ~~issuance~~six ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~Series~~June I30, ~~preferred~~2013 ~~units which were recorded net of underwriters’ discount~~ and ~~issuance~~the ~~costs.~~year ~~Net~~ended ~~proceeds from SL Green’s offering of Series~~December I31, ~~preferred~~2012 ~~stock~~are ~~(approximately~~presented ~~$221.9 million) were contributed to us by SL Green in exchange for 9.2 million Series I preferred partnership units.~~below:

We have 7,700,000 units of our 7.625% Series C cumulative redeemable preferred units of limited partnership interest, or the Series C preferred units, outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. The Series C preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.90625 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. SL Green is entitled to redeem its 7.625% Series C cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or the Series C preferred stock, at par for cash at its option. The Series C preferred units were recorded net of underwriters’ discount and issuance costs. In September 2012, SL Green redeemed 4,000,000 shares of its 11,700,000 shares of Series C preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share plus $0.3707 in accumulated and unpaid dividends on such preferred stock through September 24, 2012 and recognized $6.3 million of costs to redeem partially the Series C preferred stock. Simultaneously with that redemption, an equal number of our Series C preferred units were redeemed at the redemption price paid by SL Green to the Series C preferred stockholders.

	June 30, 2013					December 31, 2012
	Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance at beginning of year	1,201,000			$	75.05	1,277,200			$	63.37
Granted	201,000			76.67		361,331			75.36
Exercised	(156,730		)	51.89		(382,612		)	36.65
Lapsed or cancelled	(24,035		)	84.71		(54,919		)	72.99
Balance at end of period	1,221,235			$	78.10	1,201,000			$	75.05

Options exercisable at end of period	504,092			$	85.05	479,913			$	86.85
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period	$	3,867,342				$	6,602,967

InAll ~~July 2012,~~options SLwere ~~Green~~granted ~~redeemed~~within ~~all~~a ~~4,000,000~~price ~~shares~~range of ~~its~~$20.67 7to $137.~~875%~~18. The ~~Series D~~remaining ~~cumulative~~weighted ~~redeemable~~average ~~preferred~~contractual ~~stock,~~life orof the ~~Series D~~options ~~preferred~~outstanding ~~stock,~~was ~~at a redemption price of $25~~4.0032 ~~per~~years ~~share~~and ~~plus~~the ~~$0.4922~~remaining inweighted ~~accumulated~~average ~~and~~contractual ~~unpaid~~life ~~dividends~~of onthe ~~such~~options ~~preferred~~exercisable ~~stock~~was 3.64 years.

29During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we recognized approximately $1.3 million, $2.6 million, $1.1 million and $2.8 million of compensation expense, respectively, for these options. As of June 30, 2013, there was approximately $10.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years.

~~Table~~Stock-based ~~of Contents~~Compensation

Effective January 1, 1999, SL Green ~~Operating~~implemented ~~Partnership~~a deferred compensation plan, Lor the Deferred Plan, covering certain of our employees, including SL Green’s executives.P The shares issued under the Deferred Plan were granted to certain employees, including SL Green’s executives, and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or SL Green meeting established financial performance criteria. Annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% to 35% once performance criteria are reached.

~~Notes~~A tosummary ~~Consolidated~~of ~~Financial~~SL ~~Statements~~Green’s restricted stock as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and charges during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 is presented below:

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Balance at beginning of year	2,804,901			2,912,456
Granted	3,450			92,729
Cancelled	(600		)	(200,284		)
Balance at end of period	2,807,751			2,804,901
Vested during the period	500			408,800
Compensation expense recorded	$	2,971,339		$	6,930,381
Weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the period	$	309,362		$	7,023,942

~~March~~ 31~~, 2013~~

~~through~~Table ~~July 14, 2012 and recognized $3.7 million~~ of costs to redeem the Series D preferred stock. Simultaneously with that redemption, an equal number of our 7.875% Series D cumulative redeemable preferred units were redeemed at the redemption price paid by SL Green to the Series D preferred stockholders. The Series D preferred unitholders received annual distributions of $1.96875 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions were cumulative, subject to certain provisions.Contents

WeSL ~~also~~Green ~~have~~Operating 22Partnership,~~658~~ ~~units of our 5~~L.~~00% Series E preferred units of limited partnership interest outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference of $1~~P.~~00 per unit which are included in and further described in Note 8, “Mortgages and other loans payable.”~~

InNotes November 2011, as part of an acquisition, we issued 80,000 6.00% Series H preferred units of limited partnership interest, or the Series H preferred units with a mandatory liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. The Series H preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.50 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to ~~certain~~Consolidated ~~provisions.~~Financial ~~The Series H preferred units may be redeemed at any time at par for cash at our option or the option of the unitholder.~~Statements

~~In January~~June ~~2012~~30, as part of an acquisition, we issued 1,902,000 4.5% Series G preferred units of limited partnership interest, or the Series G preferred units, with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. The Series G preferred unitholders receive annual distributions of $1.125 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and distributions are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. The Series G preferred units are convertible into a number of our common units of limited partnership interest equal to (i) the liquidation preference plus accumulated and unpaid distributions on the conversion date divided by (ii) $88.50. The Series G preferred units also provide the holder with the right to require us to repurchase the Series G preferred units for cash before January 31, 2022.2013

~~We also have 60 units of our Series F preferred units outstanding with a mandatory liquidation preference of $1,000.00 per unit.~~(unaudited)

~~Dividend~~The ~~Reinvestment~~fair value of restricted stock that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and ~~Stock~~year ~~Purchase~~ended ~~Plan~~December 31, 2012 was $0.02 million and $22.4 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, there was $9.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.1 years.

InFor ~~March 2012,~~the SLthree ~~Green~~and ~~filed~~six amonths ~~registration~~ended ~~statement~~June 30, ~~with~~2013 ~~the~~and ~~SEC~~2012, ~~for~~approximately ~~its~~$1.0 ~~dividend~~million, ~~reinvestment~~$2.0 ~~and~~million, ~~stock~~$1.0 ~~purchase~~million ~~plan,~~and or$2.0 ~~DRIP~~million, ~~which~~respectively, ~~automatically~~was ~~became~~capitalized ~~effective~~to ~~upon~~assets ~~filing.~~associated SLwith ~~Green~~compensation ~~registered~~expense ~~3,500,000~~related ~~shares~~to ofSL ~~its~~Green’s ~~common~~long-term ~~stock~~compensation ~~under~~plans, ~~the~~restricted ~~DRIP.~~stock ~~The~~and ~~DRIP~~stock ~~commenced on September 24, 2001~~options.

~~During~~2010 ~~the~~Notional ~~three~~Unit ~~months~~Long-Term ~~ended~~Compensation March 31, 2013 and 2012, SL Green issued approximately 170 shares and 1.3 million shares of its common stock and received approximately $13,000 and $99.5 million of proceeds, respectively, from dividend reinvestments and/or stock purchases under the DRIP. DRIP shares may be issued at a discount to the market price.Plan

~~Second~~In ~~Amended~~December 2009, the compensation committee of SL Green’s board of directors approved the general terms of the SL Green Realty Corp. 2010 Notional Unit Long-Term Compensation Program, or the 2010 Long-Term Compensation Plan. The 2010 Long-Term Compensation Plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn, in the aggregate, from approximately $15.0 million up to approximately $75.0 million of LTIP Units in the Operating Partnership based on SL Green’s stock price appreciation over three years beginning on December 1, 2009; provided that, if maximum performance had been achieved, approximately $25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and ~~Restated~~an ~~2005~~additional ~~Stock~~approximately ~~Option~~$25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year. In order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 Long-Term Compensation Plan, SL Green’s aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50%. SL Green’s compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and ~~Incentive~~third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and, accordingly, 366,815 LTIP Units, 385,583 LTIP Units and 327,416 LTIP Units were earned under the 2010 Long-Term Compensation Plan in December 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program, 50% of these LTIP Units vested on December 17, 2012 (accelerated from the original January 1, 2013 vesting date) and the remainder is scheduled to vest ratably on January 1, 2014 and 2015 based on continued employment. In accordance with the terms of the 2010 Long-Term Compensation Plan, distributions were not paid on any LTIP Units until they were earned, at which time we paid all distributions that would have been paid on the earned LTIP Units since the beginning of the performance period.

~~SL Green has a stock option and incentive plan.~~ The ~~Second~~cost ~~Amended~~of ~~and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or~~ the ~~2005 Plan, was approved by SL Green’s board of directors in April~~ 2010 ~~and~~Long-Term SLCompensation ~~Green’s stockholders in June 2010 at SL Green’s annual meeting of stockholders. The 2005~~ Plan ~~authorizes~~(approximately ~~the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, unrestricted and restricted stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other equity—based awards~~$31.7 ~~Subject to adjustments upon certain corporate transactions or events~~million, ~~awards~~subject ~~with respect~~ to upforfeitures) towill ~~a maximum of 10,730,000 fungible units may~~ be ~~granted~~amortized ~~under~~into ~~the~~earnings ~~2005~~through ~~Plan. Currently, different types of awards count against~~ the ~~limit~~final onvesting ~~the number of fungible units differently, with (1) full-value awards (i~~period.~~e., those~~ ~~that~~We ~~deliver~~recorded ~~the~~compensation ~~full~~expense ~~value~~ of ~~the~~approximately ~~award~~$0.8 ~~upon vesting~~million, ~~such as restricted stock) counting as 1~~$2.658 ~~fungible units per share subject to such award (2) stock options~~million, ~~stock appreciation rights and other awards that do not deliver full value and expire five year from the date of grant counting as 0~~$1.799 ~~fungible~~million ~~units per share subject to such award~~ and ($3~~) all other awards (e~~.~~g., ten-year~~7 ~~stock~~million ~~options)~~during ~~counting as 1.0 fungible units per share subject to such award. Awards granted under~~ the ~~2005~~three ~~Plan prior to the approval of the second amendment~~ and ~~restatement~~six inmonths ~~June 2010~~ended continue to count against the fungible unit limit based on the ratios that were in effect at the time such awards were granted, which may be different than the current ratios. As a result, depending on the types of awards issued, the 2005 Plan may result in the issuance of more or less than 10,730,000 shares. If a stock option or other award granted under the 2005 Plan expires or terminates, the common stock subject to any portion of the award that expires or terminates without having been exercised or paid, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance of additional awards. Shares of SL Green’s common stock distributed under the 2005 Plan may be treasury shares or authorized but unissued shares. Currently, unless the 2005 Plan has been previously terminated by SL Green’s board of directors, new awards may be granted under the 2005 Plan until June 1530, ~~2020, which is the tenth anniversary of the date that the 2005 Plan was most recently approved by SL Green’s stockholders. As of March 31,~~ 2013, no fungible units were available for issuance under the 2005 Plan after reserving for shares underlying outstanding restricted stock units, phantom stock units granted pursuant to SL Green’s Non-Employee Directors’ Deferral Program and ~~LTIP Units~~2012, ~~including~~respectively, ~~among~~related ~~others,~~to ~~outstanding~~the ~~LTIP~~2010 ~~Units issued under SL Green’s 2011~~ Long-Term ~~Outperformance~~Compensation Plan~~, which remain subject to performance-based vesting~~.

302011 Outperformance Plan

~~Table~~In August 2011, the compensation committee of ~~Contents~~SL Green’s board of directors approved the general terms of the SL Green Realty Corp. 2011 Outperformance Plan, or the 2011 Outperformance Plan. Participants in the 2011 Outperformance Plan may earn, in the aggregate, up to $85 million of LTIP Units in the Operating Partnership based on SL Green’s total return to stockholders for the three-year period beginning September 1, 2011. Under the 2011 Outperformance Plan, participants will be entitled to share in a “performance pool” comprised of LTIP Units with a value equal to 10% of the amount, if any, by which SL Green’s total return to stockholders during the three-year period exceeds a cumulative total return to stockholders of 25%, subject to the maximum of $85 million of LTIP Units; provided that if maximum performance has been achieved, approximately one-third of each award may be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately one-third of each award may be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year. LTIP Units earned under the 2011 Outperformance Plan will be subject to continued vesting requirements, with 50% of any awards earned vesting on August 31, 2014 and the remaining 50% vesting on August 31, 2015, subject to continued employment with us through such dates. Participants will not be entitled to distributions with respect to LTIP Units granted under the 2011 Outperformance Plan unless and until they are earned. If LTIP Units are earned, each participant will also be entitled to the distributions that would have been paid had the number of earned LTIP Units been issued at the beginning of the performance period, with such distributions being paid in the form of additional LTIP Units. Thereafter, distributions will be paid currently with respect to all earned LTIP Units, whether vested or unvested.

SLThe ~~Green~~cost ~~Operating~~of ~~Partnership~~the 2011 Outperformance Plan (approximately $26.3 million, Lsubject to forfeitures) will be amortized into earnings through the final vesting period.P We recorded compensation expense of approximately $1.7 million, $4.5 million, $1.4 million and $2.6 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the 2011 Outperformance Plan.

~~Notes~~Deferred toStock ~~Consolidated~~Compensation ~~Financial~~Plan ~~Statements~~for Directors

~~(Unaudited)~~Under SL Green’s Independent Director’s Deferral Program, which commenced July 2004, SL Green’s non-employee directors may elect to defer up to 100% of their annual retainer fee, chairman fees and meeting fees. Unless otherwise elected by a participant, fees deferred under the program shall be credited in the form of phantom stock units. The phantom stock units are convertible into an

~~March 31, 2013~~32

~~Options~~Table ~~are granted under the plan at the fair market value on the date~~ of grant and, subject to termination of employment, generally expire ten years from the date of grant, are not transferable other than on death, and generally vest in one to five years commencing one year from the date of grant.Contents

~~The~~SL ~~fair~~Green ~~value~~Operating of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on historical information with the following weighted average assumptions for grants during the three months ended March 31Partnership, ~~2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012~~L.P.

	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Dividend yield	2.00	%	2.00	%
Expected life of option	4.7 years		3.7 years
Risk-free interest rate	0.68	%	0.46	%
Expected stock price volatility	35.50	%	37.40	%

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~A summary of the status of SL Green’s stock options as of March~~June 3130, 2013 ~~and December 31, 2012 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 are presented below:~~

	March 31, 2013					December 31, 2012
	Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance at beginning of year	1,201,000			$	75.05	1,277,200			$	63.37
Granted	201,000			76.67		361,331			75.36
Exercised	(79,036		)	50.22		(382,612		)	36.65
Lapsed or cancelled	(4,000		)	67.64		(54,919		)	72.99
Balance at end of period	1,318,964			$	76.81	1,201,000			$	75.05
Options exercisable at end of period	585,786			$	81.38	479,913			$	86.85
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period	$	3,867,342				$	6,602,967

(unaudited)

~~All~~equal ~~options~~number ~~were~~of ~~granted~~shares ~~within~~of aSL ~~price~~Green’s ~~range~~common stock upon such directors’ termination of ~~$20~~service from SL Green’s board of directors or a change in control by SL Green, as defined by the program.67 Phantom stock units are credited to ~~$137.18.~~each ~~The~~non-employee ~~remaining~~director ~~weighted~~quarterly ~~average~~using ~~contractual~~the ~~life~~closing price of SL Green’s common stock on the ~~options~~applicable ~~outstanding~~dividend ~~was~~record 4date for the respective quarter.45 Each ~~years~~participating ~~and~~non-employee ~~the~~director’s ~~remaining~~account ~~average~~is ~~contractual~~also ~~life~~credited for an equivalent amount of phantom stock units based on the ~~options~~dividend ~~exercisable~~rate ~~was~~for ~~3.75~~each ~~years~~quarter.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2013 ~~and 2012~~, weno ~~recognized~~phantom ~~approximately~~stock ~~$1.3~~units ~~million~~were ~~and $1~~earned.~~7 million of compensation expense, respectively, for these options.~~ As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2013, there ~~was~~were approximately ~~$11.6~~70,407 ~~million~~phantom ~~of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested~~ stock ~~options,~~units ~~which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years~~outstanding.

Employee Stock~~-based~~ ~~Compensation~~Purchase Plan

~~Effective~~On ~~January~~September 118, ~~1999~~2007, SL Green’s ~~implemented~~board aof ~~deferred~~directors ~~compensation~~adopted ~~plan,~~the or2008 ~~the~~Employee ~~Deferred~~Stock Purchase Plan, ~~covering~~or ~~certain~~ESPP, to encourage its employees to increase their efforts to make its business more successful by providing equity-based incentives to eligible employees. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code, and has been adopted by the board to enable our eligible employees, ~~including~~to purchase the shares of SL Green’s ~~executives~~common stock through payroll deductions. The ~~shares~~ESPP ~~issued~~became ~~under~~effective on January 1, 2008 with a maximum of 500,000 shares of the ~~Deferred~~common ~~Plan~~stock ~~were~~available ~~granted~~for issuance, subject to ~~certain~~adjustment ~~employees~~upon a merger, ~~including~~reorganization, stock split or other similar corporate change. SL Green’s ~~executives,~~filed ~~and~~a ~~vesting~~registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC with respect to the ESPP. The common stock is offered for purchase through a series of successive offering periods. Each offering period will ~~occur~~be ~~annually~~three ~~upon~~months in duration and will begin on the ~~completion~~first day of each calendar quarter, with the first offering period having commenced on January 1, 2008. The ESPP provides for eligible employees to purchase the common stock at a ~~service~~purchase price equal to 85% of the lesser of (1) the market value of the common stock on the first day of the offering period or (2) the market value of the common stock on the last day of the offering period. The ESPP was approved by SL Green’s stockholders at its 2008 annual meeting ~~established~~of ~~financial~~stockholders. ~~performance~~As ~~criteria~~of June 30, 2013, approximately 68,483 shares of SL Green’s common stock had been issued under the ESPP. ~~Annual~~ ~~vesting~~SL ~~occurs~~Green atcontributed ~~rates~~the ~~ranging~~proceeds from ~~15%~~the sale of those shares to ~~35%~~us ~~once~~in ~~performance~~exchange ~~criteria~~for ~~are~~an ~~reached~~equivalent number of our common units of limited partnership interest.

31Earnings per Unit

~~Table~~Earnings ofper ~~Contents~~unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is computed as follows (amounts in thousands):

SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Numerator (Income)
Basic Earnings:
Income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	8,520	$	106,461	$	27,984	$	132,605
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
Stock options	—		—				—
Diluted Earnings:
Income attributable to SLGOP common unitholders	$	8,520	$	106,461	$	27,984	$	132,605

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013	2012	2013	2012
Denominator (Weighted Average Units)
Basic Earnings:
Units attributable to common unitholders	94,312	92,982	94,224	91,386
Effect of Dilutive Securities:

Filing Compare · SL GREEN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.