8-KFiled Jun 10, 8:00 PM ET

Fortive Corp Reports Annual Meeting Vote Results

$FTV · Fortive Corp

Research Summary

AI-generated summary of this SEC filing

Updated

Fortive Corp Reports Annual Meeting Vote Results

What Happened Fortive Corporation (FTV) held its annual meeting of shareholders on June 9, 2026 and filed an 8-K reporting the voting results. Shareholders elected all eight director nominees, approved the advisory “say-on-pay” vote for named executive officer compensation, and ratified Ernst & Young LLP as Fortive’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2026.

Key Details

  • Director elections (For / Against / Abstain; Broker Non-Votes: 8,872,467 for each nominee):
    • Daniel L. Comas: 278,928,126 For; 2,820,139 Against; 59,356 Abstain
    • Sharmistha Dubey: 275,112,249 For; 6,634,401 Against; 60,971 Abstain
    • Rejji P. Hayes: 279,148,160 For; 2,599,621 Against; 59,840 Abstain
    • Wright L. Lassiter III: 278,900,251 For; 2,847,808 Against; 59,562 Abstain
    • Kate D. Mitchell: 271,853,197 For; 9,895,494 Against; 58,930 Abstain
    • Gregory J. Moore: 276,246,284 For; 5,501,447 Against; 59,890 Abstain
    • Jeannine Sargent: 268,819,357 For; 12,929,179 Against; 59,085 Abstain
    • Olumide Soroye: 281,242,738 For; 504,101 Against; 60,782 Abstain
  • Advisory vote on executive compensation (say-on-pay): For 265,946,471; Against 15,686,260; Abstain 174,890; Broker Non-Votes 8,872,467.
  • Ratification of auditor: Ernst & Young LLP approved as independent registered public accounting firm for year ending Dec 31, 2026 — For 274,297,484; Against 16,324,999; Abstain 57,605.

Why It Matters These results confirm board continuity and shareholder approval of Fortive’s governance direction. Election of all nominees keeps the current board in place; the approved advisory vote on executive compensation signals majority shareholder support for pay practices; and ratifying Ernst & Young maintains audit-provider continuity for the 2026 financial year. Investors tracking governance, board composition, or audit oversight can treat these outcomes as routine but material corporate governance developments.