UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-~~QSB~~Q

[X]

Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2009

[ ]

Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 000-30258

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of Small Business Issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada	98-0202944
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

Nevada

~~789 West Pender Street, Suite 1205~~98-0202944

~~Vancouver,~~(State ~~BC V6C~~or ~~1H2 Canada~~other jurisdiction of

(IRS Employer

incorporation)

Identification No.)

#121 – 8 Bond Street

Great Neck, NY, 11021

(Address of principal executive offices)

~~604~~315-~~646~~307-~~6903~~8136

(Issuer'’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~(X)~~ Yes ~~( )~~ þ No o.

~~There~~Indicate ~~were~~by 76check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,~~366~~ if any,~~166~~ ~~common~~every ~~shares~~Interactive ~~outstanding~~Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of asRegulation S-T (§232.405 of ~~August~~this ~~18,~~chapter) ~~2004~~during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o.

~~Transitional~~Indicate ~~Small~~by ~~Business~~check ~~Disclosure~~mark ~~Format~~whether ~~(check~~the ~~one): Yes~~registrant [is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. ~~] No~~See ~~[X]~~the definitions of “large accelerate filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No þ.

There were 475,586,748 common shares outstanding of as of May 12, 2009.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEETS
		June 30, 2004		December 31,
		(unaudited)		2003
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	1,553	$	7,747
Prepaid expense		1,770		-
Revenue receivable - oil and gas		2,040		3,819
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		5,363		11,566
OTHER ASSETS
Working interest in oil and gas property		72,179		72,179
Property, net of depreciation		11,523		3,677
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS		83,702		75,856
TOTAL ASSETS	$	89,065	$	87,422
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	169,168	$	61,236
Loans from shareholders and affiliated entities		14,881		18,635
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		184,049		79,871
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-		-
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common stock, 200,000,000 shares authorized,
$.001 par value; 72,116,166 and 60,716,166 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively		72,116		60,716
Additional paid-in capital		4,469,701		3,997,616
Stock options		81,090		86,000
Subscriptions receivable		(34,950)		(82,250)
Pre-exploration stage accumulated deficit		(874,762)		(874,762)
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage		(3,808,179)		(3,179,769)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)		(94,984)		7,551
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
	$	89,065	$	87,422

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
										Period from
										May 29, 2001
										(Inception of
		Three Months		Three Months		Six Months		Six Months		Exploration Stage)
		Ended		Ended		Ended		Ended		to
		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003		2004
		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
REVENUES - Oil and gas	$	3,553	$	2,534	$	7,261	$	2,741	$	10,534
COST OF REVENUE		2,398		2,298		3,494		2,298		5,792
GROSS PROFIT		1,155		236		3,767		443		4,742
EXPENSES
Exploration expense		-		-		21,718		-		590,765
Directors' fees		17,000		-		25,175		-		175,175
Consulting		254,150		205,343		491,400		352,031		1,998,182
Legal and accounting		12,131		21,512		16,422		27,702		118,902
General and administrative		27,230		10,063		58,102		11,243		93,187
Other professional services		21,825		11,348		21,825		29,370		91,011
TOTAL EXPENSES		332,336		248,266		634,642		420,346		3,067,222
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(331,181)		(248,030)		(630,875)		(419,903)		(3,062,480)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income		-		187		-		187		187
Gain on sale of securities		-		2,104		2,465		2,104		4,569
Financing expense		-		-		-		-		(50,000)
Agreement liquidation cost		-		-		-		-		(17,500)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		-		2,291		2,465		2,291		(62,744)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(331,181)		(245,739)		(628,410)		(417,612)		(3,125,224)
INCOME TAX		-		-		-		-		-
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(331,181)		(245,739)		(628,410)		(417,612)		(3,125,224)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Loss from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		(144,324)
NET LOSS	$	(331,181)	$	(245,739)	$	(628,410)	$	(417,612)	$	(3,269,548)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED
Continuing operations	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)
Discontinued operations	$	nil	$	nil	$	nil	$	nil
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.01)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING,
BASIC AND DILUTED		70,566,166		33,368,666		69,191,166		29,547,972

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
						Period from
						May 29, 2001
						(Inception of
		Six Months		Six Months		Exploration Stage)
		Ended		Ended		to
		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
		2004		2003		2004
		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(628,410)	$	(417,612)	$	(3,808,179)
Loss from discontinued operations		-		-		(57,006)
Loss from continuing operations		(628,410)		(417,612)		(3,865,185)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
by operating activities:
Allowance for bad debt		-		-		6,922
Internal gain on sale of securities		(2,465)		-		(2,465)
Depreciaton and amortization		2,002		-		2,519
Stock issued for exploration expense		-		-		12,500
Stock issued for debt and personal guarantees		34,950		-		216,588
Stock issued for working interest in oil and gas property		-		-		500,000
Stock options exercised for consulting fees		138,880		150,925		1,674,696
Stock options issued for directors' fees		25,175		-		175,175
Stock options issued for consulting fees		40,000		180,250		350,000
(Increase) in prepaid expense		(1,770)		-		(1,770)
Decrease in notes receivable, net		-		(187)		2,846
(Decrease) increase in revenue receivable		1,779		215		(2,040)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable		107,932		5,985		164,954
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(281,927)		(80,424)		(765,260)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of assets		(9,878)		-		(14,072)
Purchase of working interest in oil and gas property		-		(40,734)		(62,179)
Net cash used by investing activities		(9,878)		(40,734)		(76,251)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of stock for cash		204,650		136,626		755,607
Payment of subscriptions receivable		82,250		-		82,250
Gain on related party sale of stock		2,465		-		13,008
Loans from shareholders and affiliated entities		(3,754)		34,577		12,035
Increase (decrease) in other loans payable		-		(48,903)		(20,047)
Net cash provided by financing activities		285,611		122,300		842,853
Change in cash		(6,194)		1,142		1,342
Cash, beginning of period		7,747		115		211
Cash, end of period	$	1,553	$	1,257	$	1,553
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid	$	-	$	-	$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-	$	-
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS:
Stock issued for exploration expense	$	-	$	-	$	12,500
Stock issued for debt and personal guarantees	$	34,950	$	-	$	216,588
Stock issued for working interest in oil and gas property	$	-	$	-	$	500,000
Stock options exercised for consulting fees	$	138,880	$	150,925	$	1,674,696
Stock options issued for directors' fees	$	25,175	$	-	$	175,175
Stock options issued for consulting fees	$	40,000	$	180,250	$	350,000

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

~~(An Exploration~~ Balance ~~Stage Company)~~Sheets

~~Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements~~ (Unaudited)

June 30, 2004


		March 31,	December 31,
ASSETS		2009	2008

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$ 2,282	$ 13,639
Accounts receivable		-	166
Other current asset		-	10,423
Prepaid expenses		2,052	2,205

Total Current Assets		4,334	26,433

PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT, NET		17	77

OTHER ASSETS
Coal permits		25,017	25,017
Unproved oil & gas properties		191,066	191,066

Total Other Assets		216,083	216,083

TOTAL ASSETS		$ 220,434	$ 242,593

	LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$ 122,210	$ 131,922
Related party payables		55,000	40,000

Total Current Liabilities		177,210	171,922

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock, 600,000,000 shares authorized, at $0.001 par value, 453,586,748 issued and outstanding		453,586	453,586
Additional paid-in capital		9,389,699	9,389,699
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(400)	(1,732)
Accumulated deficit		(9,799,661)	(9,770,882)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		43,224	70,671

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$ 220,434	$ 242,593

~~NOTE 1~~The -accompanying ~~SUMMARY~~notes OFare ~~SIGNIFICANT~~an ~~ACCOUNTING~~integral ~~POLICIES~~part of these financial statements.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310 of Regulation S-B pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Company's December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. In the opinion of the Company's management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

For further information refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has suffered material recurring losses from operations since inception. At June 30, 2004, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $3,808,179 from the exploration stage and has negative cash flows from operations. The Company has limited revenues, limited cash, and negative working capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's management is currently exploring new business opportunities, which will, if successful, mitigate these factors that raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Management is currently exploring various oil and gas properties. The Company's management believes that it will be able to generate sufficient cash from public or private debt or equity financing for the Company to continue to operate based on current expense projections.

Exploration Stage Activities

The Company entered an exploration stage on May 29, 2001 and is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of oil and gas properties. Should the Company locate a commercially viable reserve, the Company would expect to actively prepare the site for extraction. The Company's accumulated deficit prior to entering the exploration stage was $874,762.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

~~(An Exploration~~Statements ~~Stage~~of ~~Company)~~Operations

~~Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements~~ (Unaudited)

June 30, 2004






	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2009	2008

EXPENSES

Consulting	$ -	$ 60,000
Management consulting to related party	15,000	15,000
Legal and professional	9,535	21,066
Lease rentals	844	-
General and administrative	695	5,772

Total Expenses	26,074	101,838

OPERATING LOSS	(26,074)	(101,838)

OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)

Interest income	-	1,824
Other expense	(2,705)	-
	(2,705)	1,824

NET LOSS	(28,779)	(100,014)

Comprehensive loss, net of tax	(400)	-

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$ (29,179)	$ (100,014)

BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANING	453,586,748	412,845,498

~~Basic and~~The ~~Diluted~~accompanying ~~Loss~~notes ~~Per~~are ~~Share~~an integral part of these financial statements.

Net loss per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. For purposes of computation of loss per share, basic and diluted shares outstanding are the same, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had stock options outstanding, equivalent to 6,950,000 common stock shares.

Use of Estimates

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

Revenue Recognition

Since entering the exploration stage, the Company recognized its first revenues during the year ended December 31, 2002. Oil and gas revenues are recognized once realization of cash payments to be received from oil and gas working interests has been determined. Oil and gas revenues are recorded using the sales method. Under this method, the Company recognizes revenues based on actual volumes of oil and gas sold to purchasers.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 150"). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of financial position. Previously, many of those instruments were classified as equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company has not yet determined that there was no impact from the adoption of this statement.

In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 149"). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

~~(An Exploration~~Statements ~~Stage~~of ~~Company)~~Cash Flows

~~Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements~~ (Unaudited)

June 30, 2004


	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2009	2008

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVIES
Net loss	$ (28,779)	$ (100,014)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	60	60
Net Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable	166	717
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10,576	142
Accounts payable	(9,712)	86,875
Related party accounts payable	15,000	14,860

Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities	(12,689)	2,640

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVIES

Purchase of working interest in oil and gas property	-	(11,120)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVIES

Proceeds from short term note payable	-	1,000

FOREIGN EXCHANGE EFFECT ON CASH	1,332	-

NET DECREASE IN CASH	(11,357)	(7,480)

CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	13,639	7,876

CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$ 2,282	$ 396

SUPPLEIMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

CASH PAID FOR:
Interest	$ -	$ -
Income taxes	$ -	$ -

~~NOTE 2~~The -accompanying ~~WORKING~~notes ~~INTERESTS~~are INan ~~OIL~~integral ~~AND~~part ~~GAS~~of ~~PROPERTIES~~these financial statements.

Stephens County, Texas

In February of 2002, the Company bought a 5% working interest and a 2.5% net revenue interest in a proposed 15-well oil and gas project in Stephens County, Texas. In November 2002, the Company signed an agreement with Krause Chemical, Ltd. to increase the Company's net revenue interest in the Z2 well located on the aforementioned property to 3.9% for consideration of $10,000 cash, which was paid in full in the fourth quarter of 2003.

Drayton Valley, Alberta

In September 2003, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Pemberton Energy Ltd. whereby the Company may purchase an option to acquire a 45% working interest in Tomahawk Prospect in Drayton Valley, Alberta, for 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock. In October 2003, the Company's board of directors issued the shares per the agreement.

Jack and Palo Pinto County, Texas

In September 2003, the Company entered into a participation agreement with The Cumming Company, Inc., whereby the Company paid $425 for a 1% working interest and a 0.8% net revenue interest in the Marble Falls Rework Project. The agreement also includes the re-entry and re-completion of Martex Ima Cridges well and the Kinder well. Furthermore, in 2003, the Company paid $6,945 for 1% of all turnkey and recompletion costs attributed to the project.

In February 2004, the Company entered into an additional participation agreement with The Cumming Company, Inc., whereby the Company paid $750 for a 1% working interest and a 0.8% net revenue interest in five wells on the Marble Falls Rework Project. The Company paid $15,968 for 1% of all turnkey and re-completion costs attributed to the project.

Kern County, California

In October of 2002, the Company purchased a 5% working interest and a 3.875% net revenue interest in an oil well and gas project in Kern County, California from a related party for $2,500. In the year ended December 31, 2003, the well was plugged and abandoned and the Company's interest was written off.

Saskatchewan, Canada

In March 2003, the Company entered into a participation agreement with Patch Energy Inc., a related party, whereby the Company may incur up to 5% of the costs associated with a drill program and earn up to a 3.5% net revenue interest in an oil and gas property located in Saskatchewan, Canada. In May 2003, the Company assigned 30% of its interest in the aforementioned property to a related party. Thus, the Company currently has a 3.5% working interest and a 2.45% net revenue interest.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

~~(An Exploration~~Notes ~~Stage~~to ~~Company)~~Interim Financial Statements

~~Condensed Notes~~March to31, ~~Interim Financial Statements~~2009

~~June 30,~~NOTE ~~2004~~1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

~~Muskogee County,~~Basis ~~Oklahoma~~of Presentation

~~In October~~The ~~2003,~~accompanying ~~the~~unaudited ~~Company~~financial ~~entered~~statements ~~into~~have anbeen ~~agreement~~prepared in accordance with ~~Warpath~~generally ~~Energy,~~accepted ~~Inc., whereby~~accounting principles for interim financial information with the ~~Company~~instructions ~~may~~to ~~incur~~Form 5%10-Q and Item 310 of Regulation S-X pursuant to the ~~costs~~rules and regulations of ~~acquisition~~the Securities and ~~work-over~~Exchange Commission. Accordingly, ~~estimated~~ tothey bedo ~~$17,500,~~not ~~for~~include aall 5%of ~~working~~the ~~interest~~information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the ~~Cloud~~United ~~Creek~~States ~~Project~~for ~~in Muskogee~~complete ~~County,~~financial ~~Oklahoma~~statements. InThe accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the ~~year~~audited ~~ended~~financial statements of the Company included in the Company's December 31, ~~2003,~~2008 ~~the~~Annual ~~operator, Warpath~~Report ~~Energy,~~on ~~Inc~~Form 10-K. In the opinion of the Company’s management, ~~was~~all ~~unable~~adjustments toconsidered ~~secure~~necessary ~~financing~~for ~~under~~a ~~the~~fair ~~contract~~presentation ~~and~~have been included. The results of the ~~lease~~ ~~owner~~three ~~sold~~months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the ~~property.~~results ~~This~~of ~~transaction~~operations ~~terminated~~expected at the ~~agreement~~year ~~with Micron~~ending December 31, 2009.

~~Goliad County~~For further information refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~Texas~~2008.

~~In February~~NOTE ~~2004,~~2 ~~the~~– ~~Company~~GOING entered into a participation agreement with Fairchild International Corporation, whereby the Company may earn a 0.375% net revenue interest in an oil and gas property, the Manahuilla Creek Prospect located in Goliad County, Texas, for consideration of $1,500, incurring 0.5% and 0.375% of the costs associated with the test well operations and of the development of program lands, respectively. CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has suffered material recurring losses from operations since inception. At March 31, 2009, the Company has an accumulated deficit, limited cash, negative working capital, and has negative cash flows from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s management is currently exploring new business opportunities, which will, if successful, mitigate these factors that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

The Company’s management believes that it will be able to generate sufficient cash from public or private debt or equity financing for the Company to continue to operate based on current expense projections but cannot be certain.

NOTE 3 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~The Company~~For ~~occupies~~the ~~office~~quarter ~~space~~ended ~~provided by an officer of the Company. In~~ March ~~2003~~31, 2009 the Company ~~reached~~had an$15,000 ~~oral~~of ~~agreement~~related toparty ~~pay~~expense ~~$300~~incurred ~~per month~~ for ~~this space.~~services Inrendered ~~September~~by ~~2003~~Giddy Up, ~~the~~whose ~~agreement~~managing ~~was~~partner ~~amended~~is ~~to increase~~ the ~~office~~Company’s ~~space~~ director and ~~pay~~president, ~~$579~~for ~~per~~management ~~month~~fees.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, a director realized gains from the sale of personal holdings of the Company's common stock. The holding period relating to these sales was less than six months. In accordance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act of 1934, the involved director remitted to the Company the realized gains, which have been recorded as other income in the amount of $2,465 in the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 4 - SHORT-TERM DEBT

The following comprises short-term debt at the dates shown:

		June 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
Loans from Graeme Sewell	$	13,548	$	17,302
Loans from Jason Gigliotti		1,333		1,333
Total loans from shareholders	$	14,881	$	18,635

These amounts are uncollateralized, bear no interest and have no specific maturity.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

~~(An Exploration~~Notes ~~Stage~~to ~~Company)~~Interim Financial Statements

~~Condensed Notes~~March to31, ~~Interim Financial Statements~~2009

~~June 30,~~NOTE ~~2004~~4- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

~~NOTE 5~~Subsequent -to ~~COMMON~~March ~~STOCK~~31, 2009, we repriced 64,500,000 stock options to $0.006 from $0.016, and we repriced 1,500,000 stock options to $0.006 from $0.0151. Also, 22,000,000 stock options were exercised into common stock at $0.006 per share for cash proceeds of $24,000 and subscriptions receivable of $108,000.

In the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company issued 10,900,000 shares from the exercise of stock options for $204,650 cash, $34,950 for subscriptions receivable, and $75,000 for consulting services. The Company also issued 500,000 shares to a consultant for consulting services for $17,000.

In 2003, the Company issued 36,500,000 shares from the exercise of stock options for $550,957 cash, $82,250 subscriptions receivable, and $652,316 for consulting services. The Company also issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock for the exercise of options for directors' fees of $45,000 and 250,000 shares for exploration expense for $12,500.

NOTE 6 - STOCK OPTIONS

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, the fair values of stock options granted are estimated using the Black-Scholes Option Price Calculation. The following assumptions were made to value the stock options: for 2004, risk-free interest rate of 4%, volatility of 79% and a life ranging from 3 months to 1 year; for 2003, risk-free interest rate of 4%, volatility of 85% and a life ranging from 3 months to 5 years.

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, 17,450,000 stock options were issued to consultants and directors for services rendered, and 10,900,000 stock options were exercised.

For the year ended December 31, 2003, 24,900,000 stock options were issued to consultants for services rendered, and 26,150,000 stock options were exercised.

In January 2003, the exercise prices on two blocks of stock options totaling 2,500,000 and 2,600,000 were adjusted from $0.08 to $0.04 and $0.02, respectively. In April 2003, the exercise price on stock options totaling 1,500,000 was adjusted from $0.04 to $0.025. In September 2003, the exercise price on stock options totaling 1,300,000 was adjusted from $0.08 to $0.0375. In December 2003, the exercise prices on stock options totaling 1,000,000 and 500,000 were adjusted from $0.036 to $0.027 and $0.04 to $0.027, respectively. No additional expense resulted from the repricing of the exercise prices of the aforementioned options.

In April 2003, the 2003 Stock Option Plan A was implemented. Under the plan, up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock may be issued. In August 2003, the 2003 Stock Option Plan B was implemented. Under the plan, up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock may be issued. In October 2003, the 2003 Stock Option Plan C was implemented. Under the plan, up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock may be issued. In February 2004, the 2004 Stock Option Plan was implemented. Under the plan, up to 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock may be issued.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements

June 30, 2004

The following is a summary of stock options:

Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Outstanding at January 1, 2003 6,400,000 $ 0.08 Granted 26,050,000 0.02 Exercised (26,650,000) 0.02 Expired (1,500,000) 0.02 Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2003 4,300,000 $ 0.03 Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period ended December 31, 2003 $ 0.02 Outstanding at January 1, 2004 4,300,000 0.03 Granted 17,450,000 0.03 Exercised (10,900,000) 0.03 Expired (3,900,000) 0.03 Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2004 6,950,000 $ 0.02 Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period ended June 30, 2004 $ 0.03

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders Shares Issuable Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options Weighted Average Exercise Price Options Available for Issuance Under Plans 2002 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan 1,150,000 $0.03 200,000 2003 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan C 100,000 $0.03 0 2004 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan 5,700,000 $0.03 0 Total 6,950,000 200,000

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Condensed Notes to Interim Financial Statements

June 30, 2004

NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Liabilities of Discontinued Pinnacle Plastics, Inc. ("PPI")

The Company's previously owned dormant subsidiary, PPI, owed its creditors approximately $200,000, the majority of which was a loan from the Bank of Nova Scotia in the amount of $145,000 (including accrued interest). Although two of the Company's former directors personally guaranteed 25% of this bank loan, these individuals were instrumental in the passage of a corporate resolution whereby the Company assumed their guarantees prior to their departure as board members. The Company's management and its legal counsel believed that the aforementioned resolution was inappropriate and did not legally bind the Company.

The balance of PPI's liabilities appeared to be debts in the name of PPI rather than in the Company's name. At March 31, 2003, the Company reclassified the $201,330 of net liabilities of discontinued operations to commitments and contingencies. In December 2003, the Company sold the stock of Pinnacle Plastics, Inc. and received confirmation from the Bank of Nova Scotia, that the bank loan could not be asserted as an obligation of Micron. Assurances were given by the bank and the Company's outside counsel that the matter was settled with the sale, with no further recourse to the Company. As a result of these assurances, the Company removed the aforementioned $201,330 from its balance sheet at December 31, 2003 and recorded this gain as originating from discontinued operations.

Consulting Agreements

As of December 31, 2003, all prior consulting agreements entered into by the Company have been cancelled and any prepaid amounts having been retained by the affected consultants and any amount owed to the consultants have been subsequently paid per the contracts.

In February 2004, the Company entered into a six-month consulting agreement with a consultant for 1,000,000 shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had issued 500,000 shares of common stock valued at $17,000 to the consultant. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, the agreement was cancelled. No additional shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the agreement.

NOTE 8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Stock Transactions

Subsequent to June 30, 2004, 4,250,000 shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options to an officer and consultant for services rendered.

Jones County, Texas

On July 14, 2004, the Company entered into a participation agreement with Habanero Resources Inc., a related party, whereby the Company agreed to purchase a 1.5625% working interest in a re-entry oil and gas project in Jones County, Texas for turnkey costs of $2,967.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~For~~As ~~the~~of ~~period~~March ~~ending June 30~~31, ~~2004~~2009, we had acurrent ~~working~~assets ~~capital~~of ~~deficit~~$4,334 and current liabilities of $78177,~~339~~210 as compared to acurrent ~~working~~assets ~~capital deficit~~ of $6426,~~290~~433 ~~for~~and ~~the~~current ~~period~~liabilities ~~ending~~of $171,922 as of December 31, ~~2003~~2008. As such, as of ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2009, ~~our~~we ~~cash~~had ~~and~~working ~~cash~~capital ~~equivalents~~deficit ~~decreased~~of to $1172,~~553~~876 ~~from~~as compared to a working capital deficit of $7145,~~747~~489 atas of December 31, ~~2003~~2008. Current ~~Cash~~liabilities ~~used~~at byMarch ~~operating~~31, ~~activities~~2009 ~~amounted~~and toDecember ~~$281~~31,~~927~~ 2008, ~~primarily~~consisted ~~attributable~~of toaccounts ~~the~~payable ~~net~~and ~~loss~~accrued ~~of $628~~liabilities,~~410~~ ~~offset~~as bywell ~~stock~~as ~~and~~related ~~stock~~party ~~option transactions~~payables. Our ~~Cash~~total ~~used~~assets indecreased ~~investing~~from ~~activities~~$242,593 ~~amounted~~at December 31, 2008 to $9220,~~878~~434 at March 31, ~~reflecting~~2009, ~~the~~mainly ~~purchase~~due ofto a decrease in cash and cash equivalents, as well as a decrease in other current assets. Our ~~Financing~~current ~~activities~~liabilities ~~provided~~increased by $~~285~~5,~~611~~288 from ~~the~~December ~~issuance~~31, of2008 ~~stock~~to ~~and~~March ~~payment~~31, of2009, ~~subscription~~due ~~fees.~~to an increase in related party payables.

WeDuring ~~have~~the ~~been~~three ~~financing~~months ~~our~~ended ~~operations~~March ~~primarily~~31, ~~from~~2009, ~~loans~~our ~~from~~operating ~~consultants,~~activities ~~and~~used ~~proceeds~~cash ~~from~~of $12,689, the ~~exercise~~majority of ~~stock~~which ~~options~~consisted ~~and issuance~~ of ~~stock~~our ~~for~~net ~~cash. We~~loss ~~intend~~of to$28,779 ~~raise~~and ~~additional~~a ~~funds~~decrease ~~through~~in ~~private~~accounts ~~offerings~~payable of ~~our~~$9,712, ~~common~~partially ~~stock~~offset by an increase in ~~order~~related toparty ~~drill~~payables orof ~~participate~~$15,000 inand other items. During the ~~drilling~~three ofmonths ~~oil~~ended ~~and~~March ~~gas~~31, ~~wells~~2008, ~~make~~our ~~option~~operating ~~payments~~activities provided us cash of $2,640, ~~and~~the tomajority ~~generally~~of ~~meet~~which ~~our~~consisted ~~future~~of ~~corporate~~an ~~obligations. There~~increase isin noaccounts ~~guarantee~~payable ~~that~~of we$86,875 ~~will~~and bean ~~successful~~increase in ~~arranging~~related ~~the~~party ~~required~~accounts ~~financing~~payable of $14,860, partially offset by our net loss of $100,014.

~~Our~~During ~~total~~the ~~assets~~three ~~increased~~months byended March 31, 2009, our investing activities provided us $1Nil,~~643~~ ~~from~~as opposed to using cash of $8711,~~422~~120 atduring ~~December~~the three months ended March 31, ~~2003~~2008. The touse ~~$89,065~~of atcash ~~June~~in 30the three months ended March 31, ~~2004~~2008, ~~mainly~~was ~~due~~attributable to the ~~increase~~purchase inof ~~our~~working ~~properties~~interests ~~net~~in ofoil ~~depreciation~~and gas properties.

WeDuring ~~have a 2.5% net revenue interest in~~ the Z1three ~~well~~months ~~and~~ended aMarch ~~3.9%~~31, ~~net~~2009, ~~revenue~~our ~~interest~~financing inactivities Z2provided ~~well~~us ~~located~~$Nil, onas ~~the~~opposed ~~Green~~to ~~Ranch~~providing ~~Prospect. Both~~us ~~wells~~cash ~~are~~of ~~currently~~$1,000 ~~producing~~during ~~oil~~the ~~and~~three ~~gas~~months ~~revenue. We~~ended ~~have~~March ~~elected to go non-consent on the third well~~31, ~~the C-1 Well~~2008. ~~Therefore~~ Cash weprovided ~~will~~to ~~incur~~us noduring ~~costs of drilling this well and we will only start receiving revenue from this well after 500% of our portion of~~ the ~~drilling~~three ~~costs~~months ~~are~~ended ~~recovered~~March ~~before~~31, we2008, ~~can~~was ~~collect~~due ~~out interest in the C-1 Well. We do not expect~~ to ~~have~~proceeds ~~any~~from ~~cash~~a ~~commitments~~short onterm ~~this~~note ~~project during the year ending December 31, 2004~~payable.

We ~~have~~expect atotal ~~3.5%~~cash ~~working~~commitments ~~interest~~for ~~and~~the aremainder ~~2.45%~~of ~~net revenue interest~~ the ~~Kerrobert~~fiscal ~~Project. We~~year ~~have~~to ~~drilled~~be ~~and~~approximately ~~cased nine wells on this property~~$100, ~~and all nine wells are currently producing oil and generating revenue for us~~000. ~~Our~~The ~~ability~~majority toof ~~drill~~the ~~further~~$100,000 ~~wells~~cash oncommitments ~~this~~for ~~project is completely contingent on our partners' and~~ the ~~operator's~~year ~~decision~~are towhat ~~drill~~we ~~further~~estimate ~~wells,~~ our ~~partners'~~general ~~ability to meet future cash calls~~ and ~~our~~administrative ~~ability~~expenses to ~~meet~~be, ~~future~~which ~~cash~~would ~~calls. We~~include doapproximately ~~not~~$10,000 ~~expect~~for tolegal ~~have~~fees, ~~any~~$35,000 ~~cash~~for ~~commitments~~accounting ~~on this project during the year ending December 31~~fees, ~~2004~~$45,000 ~~however~~for ifmanagement wefees, ~~decide~~and tothe ~~participate~~remainder in ~~further~~general ~~drilling~~working ~~on this property, there will be additional cash commitments~~capital.

We ~~have~~do annot ~~option~~have tosufficient ~~acquire~~resources aat ~~45% working interest in~~ the ~~Tomahawk~~present ~~Prospect. Our~~time ~~ability~~ to ~~start~~fund ~~drilling~~such ~~on this project is contingent on our majority partners' decision of when to begin drilling, our partners' ability to meet their future~~ cash ~~calls~~commitments and ~~our~~we ~~ability~~will torequire ~~meet~~further ~~our~~funding ~~future~~in ~~cash~~order ~~calls. We may not be able~~ to ~~ever~~pay ~~drill~~these ~~this property based upon our partners' inability to raise the necessary funds. We do not expect to have any~~ cash commitments ~~on this project~~ for ~~the year ending December 31, 2004, unless a decision is made by either working interest partner to begin drilling on this prospect~~2009.

We ~~have~~also aown 1%interests ~~working~~in ~~interest~~four ~~and~~leases ain ~~0.8%~~the ~~net~~Alberta ~~revenue~~Oil ~~interest~~Sands in Alberta, Canada. For the ~~Marble~~remainder ~~Falls~~of ~~Rework~~fiscal ~~Project~~2009, inwe ~~Jack~~have ~~County~~approximately ~~and~~$1,000 ~~Palo~~in ~~Pinto~~annual ~~County,~~rental ~~Texas. We~~payments ~~have~~due ~~drilled~~to ~~six~~the ~~wells~~Alberta onCrown ~~this~~for ~~property,~~our ~~the~~Alberta ~~Kinder~~Oil #1Sands ~~Well,~~leases. As of the ~~Martex~~date ~~Ima~~of ~~Bridges~~this #2Quarterly ~~Well~~Report, ~~the~~we ~~Wimberley~~had #3incurred ~~Well,~~$721 ~~the~~in ~~Wimberley~~annual #5rental ~~Well,~~payments to the ~~Wimberley~~Alberta Crown for one Alberta Oil Sands lease.

#7We ~~Well~~may ~~and~~have ~~the~~further ~~Henderson~~cash #3commitments ~~Well. The~~on ~~Ima~~our #2Alberta ~~Well~~Oil ~~was~~Sands ~~successfully~~lease ~~completed~~interests ~~and is producing oil and gas. Gas was discovered~~ in ~~the~~addition ~~Henderson #3 Well and after acidization gas started~~ to ~~flow~~those atdescribed ~~a rate of 300 thousand cubic feet per day~~above. This rate was achieved without having to frac the well, as the operator previously thought was required. Completion work on the Wimberley #3 Well has been completed and it is now flowing gas. The Wimberley #5 Well was drilled, bond logs were run, it was fraced and has been successfully put on line for sales. The Wimberley #7 Well has also been successfully put on line for sales. The Kinder #1 Well is awaiting crews to be fraced and tested. We plan ~~on drilling one more well on this prospect. We received a buy-out offer on Ima Bridges #2 well from Lexus Gas Corporation but decided~~ to ~~reject~~pay ~~it. Our~~our ~~ability~~expenses ~~to continue~~ with ~~this project is contingent on being able to meet future cash calls. Payment for drilling~~ the ~~first two wells were made in the year ending December 31, 2003. Our~~ cash ~~commitments~~reserves onthat ~~this~~we ~~project~~currently ~~during~~have ~~the~~and ~~first~~from ~~quarter~~private ~~ended~~placements ~~March~~of ~~31,~~our ~~2004~~common ~~were $16~~stock,~~718~~ tohowever ~~drill~~such ~~five~~funds ~~wells~~may, ~~which~~and ~~was~~likely ~~paid on February 6~~will, ~~2004. During~~be ~~the~~insufficient ~~second~~to ~~quarter~~pay ~~ended~~all ~~June~~of ~~30,~~our ~~2004, we received a cash call on the Ima Bridges #2 well for $495, which was paid on May 13, 2004~~expenses.

WeDuring ~~have a 0.375% net revenue interest in~~ the ~~Manahuilla~~remainder Creek Prospect. In May 2004, drilling commenced on the first well, the BB Gayle #1 Well. By June 2004, the first well was drilled, logged and casing had been set on it. According to the operaor, there were many gas shows while drilling. Completion operations commenced in July 2004 and are currently ongoing. The BB Gayle #1 is located on 1,265 acres of ~~oil and gas leases covering~~ the ~~expanded~~fiscal ~~Yegua trend. We expect to have in cash commitments of approximately $5,000 per well on each to be drilled on this project during the~~ year ending December 31, ~~2004~~2009, ifwe ~~additional~~do ~~wells~~not ~~are~~have toany becash ~~drilled~~commitments onin ~~this~~connection ~~prospect.~~with other projects.

~~Results~~We plan to raise additional funds in order to drill or participate in the drilling of ~~Operations~~our oil sands leases, make annual payments to the Alberta Crown for our various leases, and to generally meet our future corporate obligations. We plan to raise funds through the sale of our common stock or through loans. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in arranging the required financing. Unless we raise funds through the sale of our common stock or through loans, we cannot drill further wells that have not yet been paid for, or acquire new properties. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise adequate capital.

~~First~~Our ~~Quarter~~future ~~2004~~success ~~Compared~~will be materially dependent upon our ability to satisfy additional financing requirements. We are reviewing our options to raise equity capital. In order to satisfy our requisite budget, we have held and will continue to conduct negotiations with ~~First~~various ~~Quarter~~investors. ~~2003~~We cannot predict whether these negotiations will result in additional investment income for us.

~~Revenues. We~~Funding ~~have~~for ~~realized~~our ~~$3,553 and 7,261 in revenue from~~ operations ~~for~~may ~~the~~not ~~three~~be ~~and~~available ~~six~~under ~~months~~favorable ~~ended~~terms, ~~June~~if ~~30,~~at ~~2004~~all. ~~(2004)~~If ~~compared~~adequate tofunds ~~$2,534~~are ~~and~~not $2available,~~741~~ ~~for~~we ~~the~~may ~~three~~be ~~and~~required ~~six~~to ~~months~~further ~~ended~~curtail ~~June~~operations ~~30,~~significantly ~~2003~~or ~~(2003). The~~to ~~increase~~obtain offunds ~~$1,019~~by ~~and~~entering ~~$4,520,~~into ~~respectively~~arrangements iswith ~~primarily~~collaborative ~~due~~partners toor ~~our~~others ~~having~~that ~~fourteen~~may ~~producing~~require ~~oil~~us ~~and gas wells during 2004, compared~~ to ~~receiving~~relinquish ~~revenue~~rights ~~from~~that ~~two~~we ~~oil~~would ~~and~~not ~~gas~~otherwise ~~wells during 2003~~relinquish.

~~Cost~~Results of ~~Revenues~~Operations. Cost of revenue was $2,398 and $3,494 in 2004 compared to $2,298 in both periods in 2003. There was an increase of $1,196 (48%, as a percentage of revenue) from the six months ending June 30, 2004 to the comparative period in 2003. This increase of $1,196 is primarily attributable to an increase in related revenues and a larger number of producing oil and gas wells.

~~Exploration~~Our ~~Expense. Exploration~~Statement ~~expenses~~of ~~increased~~Operations tofor ~~$21,718 in~~ the ~~six~~three months ~~ending~~ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004~~2009 ~~compared~~indicated toa $0net inloss ~~the~~of ~~2003 comparative period. This~~ $2128,~~718~~779 ~~increase~~(nil ~~was~~per ~~primarily~~common ~~due~~share), ~~payments~~compared to ~~Martex~~a ~~Holdings~~net loss of $16100,~~718~~014 ~~and~~(nil toper ~~Patch~~common ~~Energy of $5~~share),~~000~~ infor ~~connection with~~ the ~~exploration~~three ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~Marble~~March ~~Falls~~31, ~~Rework Project and the Kerrobert Prospect~~2008.

~~General~~For ~~and~~the ~~Administrative~~three ~~Expenses.~~months ~~General~~ended ~~and~~March ~~administrative~~31, ~~expenses~~2009, ~~increased~~we tohad ~~$27,230~~loss ~~and~~from operations of $5826,~~102~~074, ~~in 2004~~ compared to $10101,~~063~~838 ~~and~~for ~~$11,243~~the inthree ~~2003~~months ended March 31, 2008. The ~~This~~decrease of total expenses of $1775,~~167~~764 ~~and~~from ~~$46~~the three months ended March 31,~~859~~ ~~increase~~2008 ~~for~~to the three ~~and~~months ~~six~~ended ~~month~~March ~~2004~~31, ~~periods~~2009, ~~was~~resulted primarily ~~due~~from ana ~~increase~~decrease in ~~promotion~~stock options granted for consulting and ~~sponsorship~~consulting ~~costs~~fees incurred of $60,000, as well as to a decrease in legal and professional fees of $11,531.

~~Consulting~~Our ~~Expenses. Consulting~~comprehensive ~~expenses~~loss at for the three ~~and~~months ~~six~~ended ~~month~~March ~~2004~~31, ~~periods~~2009 ~~were~~was $~~254~~29,~~150~~179 ~~and $491,400~~ compared to $~~205~~100,~~343~~014 ~~and $352,031~~ for the ~~comparative~~three ~~2003~~months ~~periods,~~ended ~~and~~Match ~~the~~31, ~~majority of~~ 2008.

these expenses were paid in shares of our common stock and stock options. The increase of $48,807 and $139,369 resulted primarily from stock-based compensation expense to consultants of $196,380.

Risks Associated with Operations and Expansion

There are certain risks associated with the oil and gas business, including, but not limited to, severe fluctuations in oil and gas prices, strict regulatory requirements, uncertainty of oil and gas reserves and severe market fluctuations. There can be no assurance that such risks will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We do not anticipate any significant research and development within the next 12 months, nor do we anticipate that we will lease or purchase any significant equipment within the next 12 months. We do not anticipate a significant change in the number of our employees within the next 12 months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital resources or capital reserves.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain matters discussed or referenced in this report specifies forward-looking statements of our management. Forward-looking statements are statements that estimate the happening of future events and are not based on historical fact. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "could", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate", "probable", "possible", "should", "continue", or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements.

The assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements specified in the following information represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that any of the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements specified in the following information are accurate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 3

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. ~~Management~~In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, ~~including~~an evaluation was carried by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, ~~have conducted an evaluation~~ of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ~~pursuant~~ to(as ~~Exchange~~defined ~~Act~~in ~~Rule~~Rules 13a-1415(ce) and 15d-1415(ce)~~. This~~ ~~evaluation~~under ~~was~~the ~~conducted~~Securities asExchange Act of ~~June~~1934 ~~30,~~(Exchange ~~2004~~Act)). ~~Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief~~ Disclosure ~~Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure~~ controls and procedures are ~~effective~~designed into ~~ensuring~~ensure that ~~all material~~ information required to be ~~filed~~disclosed in ~~this~~reports ~~quarterly~~filed ~~report~~or ~~has~~submitted ~~been~~under ~~made~~the ~~known~~Exchange toAct ~~them~~is inrecorded, aprocessed, ~~timely fashion. There~~summarized, ~~have~~and ~~been~~reported nowithin ~~significant changes~~the ~~in internal controls~~time orperiods specified in ~~other factors that~~SEC ~~could~~rules ~~significantly affect internal controls subsequent~~ and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to ~~the~~management, ~~date~~including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, ~~completed~~to ~~their~~allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on our evaluation, the our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, because of a material weakness.

~~(b)~~A ~~Changes~~material inweakness ~~Internal~~is ~~Control~~a ~~Over~~deficiency, ~~Financial~~or ~~Reporting. Our~~a ~~Chief~~combination ~~Executive~~of ~~Officer~~deficiencies, ~~and~~in ~~Chief~~internal ~~Financial~~control ~~Officer~~over ~~have~~financial ~~indicated~~reporting such that there ~~were~~is noa ~~significant~~reasonable ~~changes~~possibility inthat ~~our~~a ~~internal~~material ~~controls~~misstatement of our annual or ~~other~~interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

~~factors~~The ~~that~~material ~~could~~weakness ~~significantly~~relates ~~affect~~to ~~such~~the ~~controls~~lack ~~subsequent~~of tosegregation ~~the~~of ~~date~~duties ofin ~~their~~financial ~~evaluation~~reporting, as our financial reporting and ~~there~~all ~~were~~accounting functions are performed by an external consultant with no ~~such~~oversight ~~control~~by ~~actions~~a professional with ~~regard~~accounting toexpertise. Our ~~significant~~Chief ~~deficiencies~~Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer do not possess accounting expertise, and we do not have an audit committee. This weakness is due to our lack of working capital to hire additional staff. To remedy this material ~~weaknesses~~weakness, we intend to engage additional resources to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.

~~PART~~(b) II Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there were no significant changes in our internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect such controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, and there were no such control actions with regard to our significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) ~~OTHER~~of ~~INFORMATION~~the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the fiscal quarter for which this report is furnished that have materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over our financial reporting as required by Item 308(c) of Regulation S-X for the fiscal quarter for which this report is furnished.

ITEM 4T

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a. Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Our internal control over our financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Internal control over our financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of our assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorization of our management and our Board of Directors; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over our financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over our financial reporting as of March 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In the

course of that evaluation, our management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

The material weakness identified is described below:

The material weakness relates to the lack of segregation of duties in financial reporting, as our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by an external consultant with no oversight by a professional with accounting expertise. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer do not possess accounting expertise, and we do not have an audit committee. This weakness is due to our lack of working capital to hire additional staff. To remedy this material weakness, we intend to engage additional resources to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.

Based on the material weakness described above, our management has concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, our internal control over our financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over our financial reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we, engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of internal control over our financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only our management’s report in this quarterly report.

We intend to remedy the material weakness identified above.

b. Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there were no significant changes in our internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect such controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, and there were no such control actions with regard to our significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the fiscal quarter for which this report is furnished that have materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over our financial reporting as required by Item 308(c) of Regulation S-X for the fiscal quarter for which this report is furnished.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not aware of any pending litigation nor do we have any reason to believe that any such litigation exists.

ITEM 2

~~CHANGES~~UNREGISTERED INSALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES & THE USE OF PROCEEDS

~~The~~There ~~only~~were no unregistered sales ~~during the period April 1, 2004 to June 30, 2004, were the issuance~~ of ~~6,700,000~~equity ~~stock~~securities ~~options~~during ~~to consultants, directors and officers. Under~~ the ~~2004~~period ~~Stock~~January Option Plan, we granted 500,000 stock options to two directors, Bernard McDougall and Conrad Clemiss, each, at an exercise price of $0.03 on April 12, 2004, with an expiry date of July 11, 2004. On June 18, 2004, the exercise price of these 1,~~000,000~~ ~~stock~~2009 ~~options were amended~~ to ~~$0.02~~March ~~and the exercise date was amended to September 16~~31, ~~2004~~2009. On June 18, 2004, under the 2004 Stock Option Plan we granted 2,500,000 stock options to two consultants, Jason Gigliotti and Nolan Moss, each, at an exercise price of $0.02 expiring on September 16, 2004. Also, on June 18, 2004 we granted 700,000 stock options to an officer, Negar Towfigh, at an exercise price of $0.02 expiring September 16, 2004.

ITEM 3

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

~~Non-applicable~~None.

ITEM 4

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

~~Non-applicable~~None.

ITEM 5

OTHER INFORMATION

OnDuring ~~July~~the 14year ended December 31, ~~2004~~2008, we ~~entered~~applied ~~into~~to athe ~~participation~~Saskatchewan ~~agreement~~Ministry ~~with~~of ~~Habanero~~Energy and Resources ~~Inc.~~for ~~("Habanero")~~29,952 ~~whereby~~hectares weor ~~agreed~~approximately to74,011 ~~purchase~~acres aof 1coal leases in Saskatchewan, Canada.~~5625%~~ As ~~working~~of ~~interest~~the indate aof ~~re-entry~~this ~~oil~~Quarterly ~~and~~Report ~~gas~~we ~~project~~have inreceived ~~Jones~~final ~~County,~~approval ~~Texas~~on ~~for~~coal ~~turnkey~~permits ~~costs~~covering of17,981 $2hectares or approximately 44,~~967~~433 acres. A We ~~copy~~have ofnot ~~the~~yet ~~Participation~~had ~~Agreement~~a isresponse ~~attached~~back toon ~~this~~all ~~quarterly~~the ~~report~~permits aswe ~~Exhibit~~have 10applied for.1. ~~This~~The ispermits aare ~~related~~subject ~~party~~to ~~transaction~~government inapproval ~~that~~and ~~our~~are ~~chief~~refundable ~~financial~~if ~~officer~~the ~~and~~applications ~~secretary,~~are ~~Negar~~unsuccessful. During ~~Towfigh~~the three months ended March 31, is2009, we had some permits rejected and received a ~~director~~refund of ~~Habanero~~CAD $1,736 on the associated permits. We ~~have~~are anstill ~~oral~~waiting ~~agreement~~to ~~with~~find ~~Habanero,~~out ~~whereby~~if we ~~are~~will ~~not~~receive ~~required~~further permit approvals. Management currently intends to ~~pay~~formulate a drill program and/or intends to look for a joint venture the ~~turnkey~~acreage ~~costs~~with other companies whose lands border our property. However a definite plan will not be implemented until 14we ~~calendar~~have ~~days~~been ~~before~~notified ~~drilling~~in ~~commences~~regards onto all the ~~property~~outstanding permit applications.

OnDuring ~~February~~the 23year ended December 31, ~~2004~~2007, we ~~entered~~acquired ~~into~~interests ain ~~six~~eleven ~~month~~leases ~~consulting~~in ~~agreement~~the ~~with~~Alberta ~~David~~Oil ~~Stadnyk~~Sands in ~~consideration for 1~~Alberta,~~000,000~~ ~~shares of our common stock~~Canada. WeDuring ~~issued Mr. Stadnyk 500,000 commons shares during~~ the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June~~March 3031, ~~2004. A~~2009, ~~copy~~we ofdropped ~~the~~our ~~Consulting~~50% ~~Agreement~~interest isin ~~attached~~six toleases and ~~this~~we ~~quarterly~~dropped ~~report~~our as100% ~~Exhibit~~interest ~~10.2. On~~in ~~July~~one 21lease, ~~2004,~~however ~~we cancelled~~ the ~~Consulting~~related ~~Agreement,~~costs ~~therefore no additional shares~~ of ~~common~~$67,152 ~~stock~~were ~~will~~written beoff ~~issued~~during tothe ~~Mr.~~year ~~Stadnyk~~ended ~~pursuant~~December to31, ~~this agreement~~2008.

Subsequent to the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repriced 64,500,000 stock options to $0.006 from $0.016, and we repriced 1,500,000 stock options to $0.006 from $0.0151. Also, 22,000,000 stock options were exercised into common stock at $0.006 per share for cash proceeds of $24,000 and subscriptions receivable of $108,000.

ITEM 6

EXHIBITS ~~AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K~~

Exhibit No.

1031.1

Participation Agreement with Habanero Resources dated July 14, 2004

10.2

Consulting Agreement with David Stadnyk dated February 23, 2004 (1)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 10A, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

3231.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 10A, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

3332

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(1) Incorporated by reference from our annual report on Form 10-KSB on April 7, 2004

Reports on Form 8-K

Thirteen Form 8-K's were filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission ("SEC") during the second quarter of 2004.

On April 13, 2004, we reported that we had been notified by the operator that the Henderson #3 Well on the Martex Prospect in Jack County, Texas had commenced operations.

On April 14, 2004, we reported that we had been notified by the operator that gas was discovered in the Henderson #3 Well.

On April 22, 2004, we reported that we had been presented an offer by Lexus Gas Corporation of Texas to purchase our interest in the Ima Bridges #2 Well in Palo Pinto County, Texas.

On April 22, 2004, we reported that we had entered into negotiations to participate in a possible partnership on several of the approximate 100 prime oil and gas pools within the Ukraine.

On April 26, 2004, we reported that we had been notified by the operator that barring any unforeseen issues the Manahuilla Creek Prospect in Goliad County, Texas was scheduled to commence operations on April 26, 2004.

On May 11, 2004, we reported that we had been notified by the operator that drill crews were scheduled to move onto the Manahuilla Creek Prospect on May 6, 2004.

On May 11, 2004, we reported drilling had commenced on the first well of the Manahuilla Creek Prospect and the well was at a depth of 2,470 feet.

On May 14, 2004, we reported that our board of directors had rejected the buy-out offer on the Ima Bridges #2 Well that we had received from Lexus Gas Corporation.

On May 19, 2004, we reported that drilling operations at the Manahuilla Creek Prospect were progressing smoothly.

On May 25, 2004, we reported that logging operations had been completed on the Manahuilla Creek Prospect.

On June 1, 2004, we reported that the completion work had been finished on the Wimberley #3 Well in Jack County, Texas and it was flowing gas.

On June 3, 2004, we reported the update provided by the Petroleum Engineer for the Manahuilla Prospect on the status of the BB Gayle #1 test well.

On June 9, 2004, we reported we had entered into negotiations on a potential multi-well oil prospect in Jones County, Texas.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada Company

/s/ ~~Bernard~~Bradley ~~McDougall~~Rudman

By: ~~Bernard~~Bradley ~~McDougall~~Rudman

Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Director

Duly Authorized Officer

Date: ~~August~~May 1912, ~~2004~~2009

/s/ Negar Towfigh

By: Negar Towfigh

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 19, 2004

Filing Compare · MICRON ENVIRO SYSTEMS INC