UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

Tx QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

~~For~~¨ ~~the quarterly~~TRANSITION ~~period~~REPORT ~~ended September~~UNDER ~~30,~~SECTION ~~2009~~ 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

£ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ___________ to _____________

Commission file number 000-29415

~~INTER-CON/PC, INC~~HYPERVIEW LTD.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

	Minnesota		41-1853972
Nevada		41-1853972
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	~~(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)~~	(IRS Employer Identification No.)	~~(IRS Employer Identification No.)~~

1350 Broadway, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018 ~~(Address of principal executive offices)~~

(Address of principal executive offices)

(212) 216-8000

(Issuer's telephone number)

~~1848~~Inter-Con/PC-Inc. ~~Harris Bridge Road, Anderson, South Carolina 29621~~ (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes T ¨ No £ x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a larger accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer £¨ Accelerated filer £¨ Non-accelerated filer £¨ Smaller reporting company T¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) (check one): Yes T x No £ ¨

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of ~~December~~October 121, ~~2009~~2010: 1192,~~930,726~~634 shares of common stock, no par value $0.001 per share.

~~Inter-Con/PC,~~Hyperview ~~Inc~~Ltd.

FORM 10-Q

~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010

PART I-- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	~~Financial Statements~~	Financial Statements
Item 2.	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition~~	1Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition	10
Item 3.	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~	3Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	11
Item 4.	~~Control and Procedures~~	3Control and Procedures	11
PART II-- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	~~Legal Proceedings~~	4Legal Proceedings	13
Item 2.	~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~	4Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	13
Item 3.	~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~	4Defaults Upon Senior Securities	13
Item 4.	~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~	4(Removed and Reserved)	13
Item 5.	~~Other Information~~	4Other Information	13
Item 6.	~~Exhibits~~	4Exhibits	13

Table of Contents

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~INTER-CON/PC, INC~~HYPERVIEW LTD.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008	F-1
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008		F-1
Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	F-2
Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended March 31, 2010 And 2009 (Unaudited)		F-2
Statements of Operations for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	F-3
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)		F-3
Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	F-4
Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)		F-4
Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)	F-5

Table of Contents

~~INTER-CON/PC, INC~~HYPERVIEW LTD.

Balance Sheets

	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	-		$	-
TOTAL ASSETS	$	-		$	-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accrued expenses		1529,~~000~~504			1324,~~500~~475
Total current liabilities		15,000			13,500
Due to shareholder		7,500			7,500
Total current liabilities		37,004			31,975
Stockholders' deficit
Common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 19,307,602 shares issued and outstanding		7,178,980			7,178,980
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding		-			-
Accumulated deficit		(7,193,980	)		(7,192,480	)
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 193,077 shares issued and outstanding		193			193
Total stockholders’ deficit		(15,000	)		(13,500	)
Additional paid-in capital		7,178,787			7,178,787
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		-			-
Accumulated deficit		(7,215,984	)		(7,210,955	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(37,004	)		(31,975	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-1

Table of Contents

~~INTER-CON/PC, INC~~HYPERVIEW LTD.

Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009			For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Revenue		-		$	-
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		500			500
Professional fees		5,029			-
Total operating expenses		500			500
General and administrative		-			500
Loss from operations		(500	)		(500	)
Total operating expenses		5,029			500
Income tax provision		(-	)		(-	)
Loss before taxes		(5,029	)		(500	)
Net loss		(500	)		(500	)
Income tax provision		-			-
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted		(0.00	)		(0.00	)
Net loss	$	(5,029	)	$	(500	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted		193,072,600			193,072,600
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted		193,077			193,077

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-2

Table of Contents

~~INTER-CON/PC, INC~~HYPERVIEW LTD.

Statements of ~~Operations~~Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009			For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Revenue		-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Operating expenses:
Net loss	$	(5,029	)	$	(500	)
General and administrative		1,500			1,500
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Total operating expenses		1,500			1,500
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Loss from operations		(1,500	)		(1,500	)
Accrued expenses		5,029			500
Income tax provision		(-	)		(-	)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		-			-
Net loss		(1,500	)		(1,500	)
NET CHANGE IN CASH		-			-
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted		(0.00	)		(0.00	)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		-			-
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted		193,072,600			193,072,600
CASH AT END OF YEAR	$	-		$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

~~INTER-CON/PC, INC~~HYPERVIEW LTD.

~~Statements of~~March ~~Cash~~31, ~~flows~~2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

	For the NineMonths Ended September 30, 2009			For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss		(1,500	)		(1,500	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accrued expenses		1,500			1,500
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		-			-
NET CHANGE IN CASH		-			-
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		-			-
CASH AT END OF YEAR		-			-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid		-			-
Taxes paid		-			-

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-4

Table of Contents

INTER-CON/PC, INC.

September 30, 2009 and 2008

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION

Infopac Systems, Inc was incorporated in the State of Minnesota in 1983. On June 8, 1999, Infopac Systems, Inc. acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of Inter-Con/PC, Inc. through a statutory merger of Inter-Con/PC, Inc. into Infopac Systems, Inc. Immediately after the merger, Infopac Systems, Inc., changed its name to Inter-Con/PC, Inc. ~~(the “Company”).~~ For financial statement reporting purposes, the acquisition has been treated as a reverse acquisition of Infopac Systems, Inc. by Inter-Con/PC, Inc. and as a recapitalization of Inter-Con/PC, Inc.

Hyperview Ltd. (“Hyperview” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 29, 2010 for the sole purpose of redomiciling Inter-Con/PC, Inc., a Minnesota corporation into the State of Nevada.

Hyperview is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred at a par value of $0.001 and 300,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001.

Effective February 8, 2010, Inter-Con/PC, Inc. merged into Hyperview. The merger was effectuated by the issuance of one share of common stock of Hyperview for every 100 shares of Inter-Con/PC, Inc. Following the merger, Hyperview shall continue as the surviving corporation and the separate corporate existence of Inter-Con/PC, Inc. shall cease.

The merger has been accounted for as a recapitalization of Hyperview for financial accounting purposes. Since Hyperview had no operations prior to the recapitalization, the financial statements of Hyperview and Inter-Con-PC/Inc. are being combined for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009 with retroactive effect being given to the issuance of the common stock.

The Company was formed as a technology-development corporation to develop, manufacture, and market a set-top-box computer that would facilitate the convergence of voice, video, data and other technologies all through the TV screen. The Company is currently inactive seeking merger and business opportunities.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Basis of presentation

The ~~Company’s~~ accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on October 21, 2010.

b. Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-4

Table of Contents

Due to the limited level of operations, the Company has not had to make material assumptions or estimates other than the assumption that the Company is a going concern.

c. Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

d. Fair value of financial instruments

F-5

Table of Contents

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1	Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2	Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3	Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as accrued expenses, approximate its fair value because of the short maturity of the instrument.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at ~~September~~ 30March 31, ~~2009~~2010 or ~~2008~~2009, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the interim period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010 or ~~2008~~2009.

e. Revenue recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

f. Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

F-5

Table of Contents

Net loss per common share

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of March 31, 2010 or 2009.

Commitment and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Cash flows reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

F-6

Table of Contents

~~The Company~~In ~~adopted~~January ~~section~~2010, ~~740-10-25~~the ofFASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards ~~Codification (“Section~~Update ~~740-10-25”)~~No. ~~Section~~ ~~740~~2010-~~10-25~~02 ~~addresses~~“Consolidation ~~the~~Topic ~~determination of~~810 ~~whether~~– ~~tax~~Accounting ~~benefits~~and ~~claimed~~Reporting orfor ~~expected~~Decreases toin beOwnership ~~claimed~~of on a ~~tax~~Subsidiary ~~return~~– ~~should be~~a ~~recorded~~Scope inClarification”, ~~the~~which ~~financial~~provides ~~statements. Under~~amendments ~~Section~~to ~~740~~Subtopic 810-10~~-25,~~ ~~the Company~~and ~~may~~related ~~recognize~~guidance ~~the~~within ~~tax~~U.S. ~~benefit~~GAAP ~~from~~to anclarify ~~uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not~~ that the ~~tax~~scope ~~position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits~~ of the ~~position. The~~ ~~tax~~decrease ~~benefits recognized~~ in ~~the~~ownership ~~financial~~provisions ~~statements from~~of ~~such a position should be measured based on~~ the ~~largest~~Subtopic ~~benefit~~and ~~that~~related ~~has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides~~ guidance ~~on de-recognition,~~applies ~~classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments~~ to ~~its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to~~ the ~~provisions of Section 740-10-25.~~following:

g1. ~~Net loss~~ ~~per~~A ~~common~~subsidiary ~~share~~or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

~~Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification~~2. ~~Basic~~ ~~net~~A ~~loss~~subsidiary ~~per~~that ~~share~~ is ~~computed~~ bya ~~dividing~~business ~~net~~or ~~loss~~nonprofit byactivity ~~the~~that ~~weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share~~ is ~~computed~~ bytransferred ~~dividing~~to ~~net~~an ~~loss~~equity bymethod ~~the~~investee weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of September 30, 2009 or ~~2008.~~joint venture

h3. ~~Recently issued~~ ~~accounting~~An ~~pronouncements~~exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a non-controlling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).

InThe ~~June 2003,~~amendments ~~the~~in ~~Securities~~this ~~and~~Update ~~Exchange~~also ~~Commission~~clarify ~~(“SEC”)~~that ~~adopted final rules under Section 404 of~~ the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~decrease ~~Act~~in ofownership ~~2002~~guidance ~~(“Section~~in ~~404”),~~Subtopic ~~as amended by SEC Release No. 33~~810-~~9072~~10 ondoes ~~October~~not ~~19,~~apply ~~2009. Commencing~~to ~~with its annual report for~~ the ~~year~~following ~~ending~~transactions ~~December~~even ~~31,~~if ~~2010,~~they ~~the~~involve ~~Company will be required to include a report of management on its internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement~~businesses:

1. Sales of ~~management’s~~ ~~responsibility~~in ~~for~~substance ~~establishing~~real estate. Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and ~~maintaining~~Equipment) ~~adequate~~and ~~internal control~~976-605 ~~over~~(Retail/Land) ~~its~~to ~~financial~~such ~~reporting;~~transactions.

~~of management’s~~2. ~~assessment~~Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights. Entities should apply the ~~effectiveness~~mineral ofproperty ~~its~~conveyance ~~internal~~and ~~control~~related ~~over financial~~transactions ~~reporting~~guidance asin ofSubtopic ~~year~~932-360 ~~end;~~(Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.

ofIf ~~the framework~~a ~~used~~decrease byin ~~management~~ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to ~~evaluate~~consider whether the ~~effectiveness~~substance of the ~~Company’s internal~~transaction ~~control~~causing ~~over~~the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial ~~reporting~~assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that require new disclosures as follows:

1.	Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.

Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number).

This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows:

Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities.

Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.

This Update also includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers' disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets (Subtopic 715-20). The conforming amendments to Subtopic 715-20 change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and provide a cross reference to the guidance in Subtopic 820-10 on how to determine appropriate classes to present fair value disclosures. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

F-7

Table of Contents

~~Furthermore, it~~In isFebruary ~~required~~2010, ~~to file~~ the ~~auditor’s~~FASB ~~attestation~~issued ~~report~~the ~~separately~~FASB onAccounting ~~the Company’s~~Standards ~~internal~~Update ~~control~~No. ~~over~~2010-09 ~~financial~~“Subsequent ~~reporting~~Events on(Topic ~~whether~~855) itAmendments ~~believes~~to ~~that the~~Certain ~~Company~~Recognition ~~has~~and ~~maintained~~Disclosure Requirements”, inwhich ~~all~~provides ~~material~~amendments ~~respects,~~to ~~effective~~Subtopic ~~internal~~855-10 ~~control over~~as ~~financial reporting.~~follows:

In1. ~~June 2009,~~An ~~the~~entity ~~FASB~~that ~~approved~~either ~~the~~(a) ~~“FASB~~is ~~Accounting~~an ~~Standards~~SEC ~~Codification”~~filer or(~~the “Codification”~~b) asis ~~the~~a ~~single~~conduit ~~source~~bond ofobligor ~~authoritative~~for ~~nongovernmental~~conduit ~~U.S.~~debt ~~GAAP to~~securities bethat ~~launched~~are ontraded ~~July~~in 1,a ~~2009. The~~public ~~Codification~~market ~~does~~(a ~~not~~domestic ~~change current~~or ~~U.S.~~foreign ~~GAAP,~~stock ~~but~~exchange isor ~~intended~~an toover-the-counter ~~simplify~~market, ~~user~~including ~~access~~local toor ~~all~~regional ~~authoritative U.S.~~markets) ~~GAAP~~is byrequired ~~providing all the authoritative literature related~~ to aevaluate ~~particular topic~~subsequent inevents ~~one~~through ~~place. All~~the ~~existing~~date ~~accounting~~that ~~standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in~~ the ~~Codification~~ ~~will~~financial bestatements ~~considered~~are ~~non-authoritative~~issued. ~~The~~If ~~Codification~~an isentity ~~effective for~~meets ~~interim~~neither ~~and~~of ~~annual~~those ~~periods ending after September 15~~criteria, ~~2009. The adoption~~then ~~did~~it ~~not~~should ~~have~~evaluate asubsequent ~~material~~events ~~impact~~through onthe ~~its~~date ~~consolidated~~the financial ~~position, results~~statements ofare ~~operations~~available orto ~~cash~~be ~~flows~~issued.

~~In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No~~2. ~~2009-04~~An ~~“Accounting~~entity ~~for~~that ~~Redeemable~~is ~~Equity Instruments~~an -SEC ~~Amendment~~filer tois ~~Section~~not ~~480-10-S99”~~required ~~which represents an update~~ to ~~section~~disclose ~~480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not expect~~ the ~~adoption~~date ofthrough ~~this~~which ~~update~~subsequent toevents have abeen ~~material~~evaluated. ~~impact~~This onchange ~~its~~alleviates ~~consolidated financial~~potential ~~position,~~conflicts ~~results~~between ofSubtopic ~~operations~~855-10 orand ~~cash~~the ~~flows~~SEC's requirements.

~~In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No~~3. ~~2009-05~~The ~~“Fair~~scope Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of ~~liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for~~ the ~~identical~~reissuance ~~liability~~disclosure isrequirements ~~not available, a reporting entity~~ is ~~required~~refined to ~~measure~~include ~~fair~~revised ~~value~~financial ~~using~~statements ~~one or more of the following techniques: 1~~only. ~~A valuation technique that uses: a.~~ The ~~quoted~~term ~~price~~revised offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that~~ is ~~consistent~~added ~~with~~to the ~~principles~~glossary of ~~topic~~Topic ~~820;~~855. ~~two~~Revised ~~examples~~financial ~~would~~statements beinclude anfinancial ~~income approach,~~statements ~~such~~revised aseither ~~a present value technique, or a market approach, such~~ as a ~~technique~~ ~~that~~result is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of acorrection ~~liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence~~ of ~~a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in~~ an ~~active market~~error ~~for~~or ~~the~~retrospective ~~identical~~application ~~liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price~~ of ~~the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements~~U. ~~The~~S. ~~Company~~generally ~~does~~accepted ~~not~~accounting ~~expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows~~principles.

~~In September~~All ~~2009,~~of the ~~FASB~~amendments ~~issued~~in ~~the~~this ~~FASB Accounting Standards~~ Update ~~No.~~are ~~2009-08 “Earnings~~effective ~~Per~~upon ~~Share~~issuance ~~– Amendments~~of tothe ~~Section~~final ~~260-10-S99”~~Update,~~which~~ ~~represents~~except ~~technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share~~ for athe ~~Period~~use ~~that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion~~ of ~~a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of~~ the ~~Calculation~~issued ~~of Earnings~~date ~~per Share~~ for ~~the~~conduit ~~Redemption~~debt ~~or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock~~obligors. ~~The~~That ~~Company~~amendment ~~does~~is ~~not~~effective ~~expect~~for ~~the~~interim ~~adoption~~or ofannual ~~this~~periods ~~update~~ending toafter ~~have~~June ~~a material impact on its consolidated financial position~~15, ~~results of operations or cash flows~~2010.

In April 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-17 “Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (Topic 605) Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition”, which provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive.

Determining whether a milestone is substantive is a matter of judgment made at the inception of the arrangement. The following criteria must be met for a milestone to be considered substantive. The consideration earned by achieving the milestone should:

Be commensurate with either of the following:

The vendor's performance to achieve the milestone

The enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the vendor's performance to achieve the milestone

Relate solely to past performance

Be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.

A milestone should be considered substantive in its entirety. An individual milestone may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may include more than one milestone, and each milestone should be evaluated separately to determine whether the milestone is substantive. Accordingly, an arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones.

A vendor's decision to use the milestone method of revenue recognition for transactions within the scope of the amendments in this Update is a policy election. Other proportional revenue recognition methods also may be applied as long as the application of those other methods does not result in the recognition of consideration in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved.

F-8

Table of Contents

~~In September~~A ~~2009,~~vendor ~~the~~that ~~FASB~~is ~~issued~~affected by the ~~FASB~~amendments ~~Accounting~~in ~~Standards~~this Update ~~No.~~is ~~2009-09 “Accounting~~required ~~for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments~~ to ~~Non-Employees”. This~~provide ~~Update~~all ~~represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees~~ of ~~an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to~~ the ~~Codification.~~following ~~The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.~~disclosures:

~~In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No~~1. ~~2009-12 “Fair~~A ~~Value~~description Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of ~~investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure~~ the ~~fair~~overall value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.arrangement

2.	A description of each milestone and related contingent consideration

3.	A determination of whether each milestone is considered substantive

4.	The factors that the entity considered in determining whether the milestone or milestones are substantive

5.	The amount of consideration recognized during the period for the milestone or milestones.

The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity's fiscal year, the entity should apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. Additionally, a vendor electing early adoption should disclose the following information at a minimum for all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of adoption:

Revenue

2.	Income before income taxes

3.	Net income

4.	Earnings per share

5.	The effect of the change for the captions presented.

A vendor may elect, but is not required, to adopt the amendments in this Update retrospectively for all prior periods.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2010, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $7,215,984 and had a net loss of $5,029 for the interim period ended March 31, 2010, respectively with no revenue earned since inception. At March 31, 2010, the Company is currently inactive and is now seeking merger opportunities. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to find a merger candidate. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

NOTE 4 – DUE TO STOCKHOLDER

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the majority stockholder paid accrued expenses of the Company of $7,500. This amount is being shown as due to stockholder. The amount is due on demand and bears no interest.

NOTE 5 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued. The Management of the Company determined that there were no subsequent events to be disclosed.

F-9

Table of Contents

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At September 30, 2009, the Company is currently inactive and is now seeking merger opportunities. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to find a merger candidate. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

NOTE 4 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management performed an evaluation of the Company’s activity through October 20, 2009, the date these financials were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there are no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

F-10

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Information set forth herein contains "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may,” “should" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. No assurance can be given that the future results covered by the forward-looking statements will be achieved. The Company cautions readers that important factors may affect the Company’s actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These factors include the Company’s lack of historically profitable operations, dependence on key personnel, the success of the Company’s business, ability to manage anticipated growth and other factors identified in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases and/or other public communications.

Plan of Operation.

We have not realized any revenues from operations for the ~~six~~three month period ended ~~September~~ 30March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and we are inactive. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition, or merger with an operating company. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2009~~2010, we had no cash and through ~~September~~ 30March 31, ~~2009~~2010, all our operating expenses have been paid by our majority stockholder.

Our plan for the next twelve months shall be to continue efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates. The Company can provide no assurance that a suitable candidate may be located or that a transaction may be consummated on terms that are favorable to the Company or that it can continue to satisfy its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The Company has incurred operating losses and negative operating cash flow since inception and future losses are anticipated. The Company’s plan of operations, even if successful, may not result in cash flow sufficient to finance and expand its business. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Realization of assets is dependent upon management’s plans to meet its financing requirements and the success of its future operations. These financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

Table of Contents

Operations and Liquidity

As of April 1, 2001, the Company has ceased operations and currently has no assets. The Company does not have any credit facilities or other commitments for debt or equity financing. No assurances can be given that advances when needed will be available.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”), which changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Pursuant to SFAS No. 161, Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161 encourages but does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In years after initial adoption, this Statement requires comparative disclosures only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on the financial results of the Company.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 amends the factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and adds certain disclosures for an entity’s accounting policy of the treatment of the costs, period of extension, and total costs incurred. FSP 143-3 must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP 142-3 to have a material impact on the financial results of the Company.

Table of Contents

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). SFAS 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board auditing amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The Company does not expect SFAS 162 to have a material effect on its financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Table of Contents

The preparation of financial statements and related notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to restructuring and impairments and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.

ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is not exposed to market risk related to interest rates or foreign currencies.

ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management and our board of directors, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2009. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were of limited effectiveness at the reasonable assurance level at such date.11

Table of Contents

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 2009. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were of limited effectiveness at the reasonable assurance level at such date.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There was no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

312

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

To the best knowledge of the officers and directors, the Company is not a party to any legal proceeding or litigation.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. ~~SUBMISSION~~(REMOVED OFAND ~~MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.~~RESERVED)

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

(a) Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Section 302 of the Sarblanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes Oxley Act Of 2002

413

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York, State of New York on ~~December~~October 121, ~~2009~~2010.

~~INTER-CON/PC,~~HYPERVIEW ~~INC~~LTD. (Registrant) /s/ Ronald S. McIntyre Name: Ronald S. McIntyre Title: Chairman, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

514

Filing Compare · HYPERVIEW LTD.