UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _____________ to ______________

Commission file number __________________________________

FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		43-1647559
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3058 East Elm Street, Springfield, Missouri 65802

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(417) 886-6600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of ~~August~~November 79, 2009 20,462,543 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 1.	Financial Statements	3
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1618
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3035
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	3135
PART II. – OTHER INFORMATION		31
ITEM 4T.	Controls and Procedures	35
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	32
PART II. – OTHER INFORMATION		36
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		32
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	36
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		36

PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

Freedom Financial Group, Inc.

Springfield, Missouri

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Freedom Financial Group, Inc. as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statement of ~~operations~~ operations for the three-month and ~~six~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the ~~six~~nine-month period ended September ~~June~~ 30, 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 10, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ Weaver & Martin, LLC

Kansas City, Missouri

~~August 7,~~November 9, 2009

FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	2009			2008
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,~~209~~192,~~161~~134		$	2,145,436
Finance receivables, net		17,~~927~~894,~~188~~729			15,938,361
Accrued interest receivable		~~192~~196,~~893~~564			184,807
Property and equipment, net		4435,~~470~~244			52,064
Deferred financing fees		~~197~~211,~~323~~998			296,337
Deferred origination costs		~~175~~169,~~702~~338			138,013
Other assets		2189,~~100~~905			351,647
Total assets	$	20,~~767~~789,~~837~~912		$	19,106,665
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Bank line of credit	$	12,~~033~~037,~~466~~332		$	9,975,734
Accounts payable		98,~~924~~969			34,914
Accrued expenses		~~116~~137,~~491~~376			147,756
Accrued compensation costs		62155,~~128~~478			61,262
Other liabilities		31,~~918~~831			22,126
Total liabilities		12,~~253~~370,~~927~~986			10,241,792
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 36,000,000 shares authorized; 20,467,001 shares issued; and 20,462,543 shares outstanding		2,047			2,047
Additional paid-in capital		13,882,347			13,882,347
Retained earnings (deficit)		(5,~~122~~271,~~545~~033	)		(4,738,477	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(~~247~~194,~~546~~042	)		(280,651	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 4,458 shares		(393	)		(393	)
Total stockholders’ equity		8,~~513~~418,~~910~~926			8,864,873
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	20,~~767~~789,~~837~~912		$	19,106,665

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Unaudited

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

June 30,

September 30, 2009

September 30, 2008

September 30, 2009

September 30, 2008

2009

2008

2009

2008

Revenues

Interest income

1,~~053~~074,~~766~~703

~~649~~789,~~990~~875

23,~~027~~102,~~557~~260

12,~~272~~062,~~912~~787

Other income

4045,~~079~~095

43,~~367~~425

80125,~~085~~180

83126,~~495~~920

Total revenues

1,~~093~~119,~~845~~798

~~693~~833,~~357~~300

23,~~107~~227,~~642~~440

12,~~356~~189,~~407~~707

Interest Expense

~~311~~331,~~745~~068

~~173~~213,~~834~~585

~~596~~927,~~808~~876

~~277~~490,~~039~~624

Revenues after Interest Expense

~~782~~788,~~100~~730

~~519~~619,~~523~~715

12,~~510~~299,~~834~~564

1,~~079~~699,~~368~~083

Provision for Credit Losses

~~322~~323,~~749~~214

~~108~~196,~~794~~704

~~679~~1,~~605~~002,819

~~140~~337,~~414~~118

Net Revenues After Provision for Credit Losses

~~459~~465,~~351~~516

~~410~~423,~~729~~011

~~831~~1,~~229~~296,745

~~938~~1,~~954~~361,965

Operating Expenses

~~550~~614,~~811~~004

~~721~~644,~~915~~060

1,~~215~~829,~~297~~301

12,~~424~~068,~~469~~528

Operating Loss

(91148,~~460~~488

)

(~~311~~221,~~186~~049

)

(~~384~~532,~~068~~556

)

(~~485~~706,~~515~~563

)

Gain on Liquidation of Subsidiary

~~1,380,250~~-

1,380,250

Net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes

(91148,~~460~~488

)

1(221,~~069,064~~049

)

(~~384~~532,~~068~~556

)

~~894~~673,~~735~~687

Provision for Income Taxes

Net Income (Loss)

(91148,~~460~~488

)

1(221,~~069,064~~049

)

(~~384~~532,~~068~~556

)

~~894~~673,~~735~~687

Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

(0.0001

)

(0.0501

)

(0.0203

)

0.0403

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Unaudited

										Accumulated
	Common Stock Shares		Common Stock Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Treasury Stock			Total
			Common		Additional					Other
	Common		Stock		Paid in		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Stock Shares		Amount		Capital		Earnings			Income			Stock			Total
Balance, December 31, 2007		19,922,543	$	1,993	$	13,802,873	$	(5,041,509	)	$	1,599,791		$	(393	)	$	10,362,755
Net income		—		—		—		303,032			—			—			303,032
Foreign currency translation
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			(280,651	)		—			(280,651	)
adjustment		—		—		—		—			(280,651	)		—			(280,651	)
Comprehensive income		—		—		—		—			—			—			22,381
Liquidation of subsidiary											(1,599,791	)					(1,599,791	)
Stock warrants issued		—		—		30,928		—			—			—			30,928
Stock Grant		540,000		54		48,546		—			—			—			48,600
Balance, December 31, 2008		20,462,543	$	2,047	$	13,882,347	$	(4,738,477	)	$	(280,651	)	$	(393	)	$	8,864,873
Net loss		—		—		—		(~~384~~532,~~068~~556	)		—			—			(~~384~~532,~~068~~556	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			3386,~~105~~609			—			3386,~~105~~609
Comprehensive loss		—		—		—		—			—			—			(~~350~~445,~~963~~947	)
Balance, June 30, 2009		20,462,543	$	2,047	$	13,882,347	$	(5,122,545	)	$	(247,546	)	$	(393	)	$	8,513,910
Balance, September 30, 2009		20,462,543	$	2,047	$	13,882,347	$	(5,271,033	)	$	(194,042	)	$	(393	)	$	8,418,926

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Unaudited

	For the Six Months Ended
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	June 30,
	2009			2008
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(~~384~~532,~~068~~556	)	$	~~894~~673,~~735~~687
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation		1726,~~516~~741			2434,~~040~~345
Provision for credit losses		~~679~~1,~~605~~002,819			~~140~~337,~~414~~118
Accretion of deferred contract purchase discounts		(~~205~~320,~~597~~304	)		(~~155~~244,~~384~~889	)
Recovery of charged-off finance receivables		~~506~~724,~~422~~235			~~530~~696,~~871~~966
Liquidation of subsidiary		-			(1,457,047	)
Stock grant expense		-			48,600
Deferral of origination costs		(~~121~~163,~~151~~462	)		(64146,~~216~~655	)
Amortization of deferred financing fees		~~144~~216,~~504~~756			~~122~~194,~~048~~300
Amortization of deferred origination costs		83132,~~462~~136			1545,~~889~~260
Changes in
Other assets		(43118,~~402~~772	)		~~(45~~157,~~541~~628	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(56,~~953~~326	)		~~107~~9,~~837~~359
Net cash provided by operating activities		~~620~~1,~~338~~023,919			~~162~~348,~~246~~672
Investing Activities
Purchase of finance receivables		(57,~~887~~722,~~966~~480	)		(49,~~848~~515,~~786~~932	)
Principal collected on finance receivables		24,~~973~~456,~~594~~536			24,~~887~~267,~~185~~962
Purchase of property and equipment		(9,922	)		(5866,~~335~~136	)
Sale of Relocation Asset		360,728			-
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,~~563~~915,~~566~~138	)		(25,~~019~~314,~~936~~106	)
Financing Activities
Deferred financing costs		(37120,~~757~~817	)		(472,347	)
Line of credit advances, net		2,050,000			25,422,760
Net cash provided by financing activities		21,~~012~~929,~~243~~183			14,950,413
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		(58,~~290~~734	)		(~~130~~142,~~625~~942	)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		6346,~~725~~698			(37157,~~902~~963	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period		2,145,436			1,857,694
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	2,~~209~~192,~~161~~134		$	1,~~819~~699,~~792~~731

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Unaudited

Note 1:

General

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Freedom Financial Group, Inc. (“FFG” or the “Company”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements have been omitted. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2009.

The information contained herein reflects all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to make the financial statements not misleading. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Note 2:

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FFG, FFG’s wholly owned subsidiary, Freedom Financial Auto Receivables, LLC (FFAR), and FFG’s wholly owned Canadian subsidiary, T.C.G. – The Credit Group Inc. (TCG), which collectively comprised a single reporting segment, the “Company.” The Company’s investment in TCG was liquidated in May 2008. See Note 10, Discontinued Foreign Operations, for further discussion of the liquidation of TCG. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Note 3:

Finance Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Finance receivables consist of the following at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:

	2009		2008
Automobiles	$	19,~~322~~336,~~353~~362	$	16,841,865
Other		~~268~~231,~~780~~731		466,626
Total finance receivables		19,~~591~~568,~~133~~093		17,308,491
Less
Unearned discount		~~901~~909,~~574~~823		730,331
Allowance for credit losses		~~762~~763,~~371~~541		639,799
		1,663,945		1,370,130
		1,673,364		1,370,130
Net finance receivables	$	17,~~927~~894,~~188~~729	$	15,938,361

Approximately 3% and 6% of the above finance receivables as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are Canadian in origin.

Amounts contractually receivable (including principal and interest) under our finance receivables at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, were as shown in the following table. The Company expects our actual collections to differ significantly from the amounts presented below as a result of prepayments, delinquent payments, partial payments and nonpayments.

2009		42,~~407~~365,~~550~~984
2010		8,~~227~~855,~~299~~563
2011		7,~~106~~596,~~679~~653
2012		5,~~167~~652,~~355~~577
2013		12,~~781~~190,~~843~~864
2014		1645,~~777~~510
Total	$	26,707,~~503~~151

Activity in the allowance for credit losses related to finance receivables for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2009

2008

2009

2008

Balance, beginning of period

~~685~~762,~~217~~371

~~650~~675,~~213~~940

639,799

811,376

Provision charged to expense

~~322~~323,~~749~~214

~~108~~196,~~794~~704

~~679~~1,~~605~~002,819

~~140~~337,~~414~~118

Losses charged off

(~~514~~546,~~848~~626

)

(~~259~~384,~~455~~599

)

(1,~~066~~613,~~449~~075

)

(~~801~~1,~~038~~185,637

)

Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts

~~263~~217,~~664~~812

~~175~~166,~~488~~095

~~506~~724,~~422~~234

~~530~~696,~~871~~966

Effect of foreign currency translation

56,~~589~~770

~~900~~(4,281

)

29,~~994~~764

(59,~~683~~964

)

Balance, end of period

~~762~~763,~~371~~541

~~675~~649,~~940~~859

~~762~~763,~~371~~541

~~675~~649,~~940~~859

The Company’s nonearning finance receivables totaled $~~161~~185,~~458~~367 at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The Company provided an allowance for credit losses related to these receivables of $~~145~~166,~~312~~830.

Note 4:

Bank Line of Credit

On January 31, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Loan and Security Agreement (“the Loan Agreement”) with ReMark Lending Co. a division of ReMark Capital Group, LLC. for a line of credit of up to $15,000,000. At the closing, which occurred on the same date, the Company executed and delivered to the Lender a promissory note in the principal amount of $15,000,000, bearing interest at the greater of 6.00% or prime rate, plus 2.00%, adjusted daily. The maximum loan amount is limited to the Maximum Average Advance Rate scale as specified in the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement also contains a Minimum Utilization Percentage which mandates a minimum outstanding balance required under the facility. The initial Minimum Utilization Percentage of 20% increased incrementally through August 2008 when the minimum required utilization became 50% of the facility for the remaining term of the loan. Under the terms of the Note, the Company is required to make monthly payments of interest, fees, and principal (if a borrowing base deficiency with respect to principal exists), with the entire principal balance and accrued interest due January 2010. The amount due under the Note may be accelerated upon a default by the Company, which includes failure to make a payment when it is due. As security for the Note, the Company granted the Lender a security interest in all assets of the Company. The Company’s previously outstanding line of credit balance with Heartland Bank was paid in full with the initial proceeds of the line.

In accordance with the terms of the Loan Agreement, FFAR is the borrower of amounts advanced under the credit facility and FFG is the originator and servicer of receivables pledged to the credit facility. All receivables originated by FFG are conveyed without recourse to FFAR together with all other related security related to the pledged receivables, including, without limitation, the security interest of the borrower in all related financed vehicles, all collections and other monies due and to become due in respect of any pledged receivable and any security received.

The loan agreement contains covenants, among others, that 1) require the Company to maintain a minimum net worth of $7,500,000 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, 2) restrict the Company’s ability to declare or pay dividends, and 3) limit the amount of capital expenditures the Company can incur in any fiscal year. The Company was not in violation of any of the loan agreement covenants as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

The Company incurred fees payable to its investment banking firm, its attorneys, and ReMark totaling $546,704 in connection with consummating the line of credit loan agreement. These fees were recorded as deferred financing fees when paid and are being amortized to interest expense over the 24 month term of the loan agreement on a straight-line basis.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company entered into an agreement to issue to the Lender at the time of or before the second borrowing on the line occurred, warrants to purchase 700,000 shares of common stock for five years at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. Pursuant to this agreement the warrants were issued on February 22, 2008. The warrants were valued at $30,929 using the Black-Scholes method adjusted by a liquidity valuation allowance applied due to the limited trading of the Company’s common stock.

The Company received notice in June, 2009, from the Lender that the Lender is no longer extending credit to finance companies and thus our line of credit will not be renewed or extended when it matures in January, 2010.

Note 5:

Income Taxes

We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $29,000,000 of net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future federal income taxes. The carryforwards expire in 2021 through 2028. The ability to utilize an NOL carryforward is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate future net income, which cannot be assured. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is likely that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we have received an assessment for interest or penalties, it has been classified in the financial statements as provision for income taxes.

Note 6:

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company had outstanding commitments to purchase finance receivables totaling approximately $1328,~~011,386~~400 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009. These commitments generally expire 20 days after they are issued if unused. Typically, the Company funds between 20% and 30% of its outstanding commitments.

The Company is obligated under a noncancelable lease for its principal office with a term of five years. Future minimum payments under this operating lease as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 are as follows:

2009		2512,~~215~~686
2010		50,740
2011		50,740
2012		50,740
2013		29,599
Total	$	~~207~~194,~~034~~505

Certain officers of the Company hold a total of 1,529,583 shares of the Company’s common stock, all or a portion of which, the Company may be required to repurchase, at the option of an officer whose employment is terminated due to a permanent disability, or after death, at the option of the officer’s estate, at a price per share ranging from 90% to 100% of the common stock’s fair market value. The specific terms concerning these options and the repurchase of the common stock are set forth in the Management Shareholders Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 17, 2007 and the Management Shareholder Agreement filed as Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 20, 2007.

The Company’s current agreement with its investment banking firm requires the Company to pay total aggregate transaction fees of not less than $550,000 to the investment banking firm should the Company consummate a loan transaction with a lender or other party that the investment banking firm introduces to the Company. If the transaction were to be consummated as a sale of all or a portion of the Company’s receivables, the fee would be 2.5% multiplied by the amount of consideration received by the Company for the sale. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company had paid fees amounting to $3565,000 to the investment banking firm.

~~The~~As of September 30, 2009, the Company had noentered ~~other~~into ~~commitments~~an asagreement to sell substantially all of ~~June~~its 30consumer loan portfolio to an unrelated third party. The purchase agreement for the transaction provides for a $150,000 breakage fee if the Company elected to terminate or failed to consummate the sale. On October 19, 2009, the Company entered into a new purchase agreement with a different unrelated third party at a substantially higher sale price and terminated the first purchase agreement and on October 20, 2009, paid the $150,000 breakage fee. The second purchase agreement provides for a $300,000 breakup fee if the Company elects to terminate the agreement.

The Company had no other commitments as of September 30, 2009.

Note 7:

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Since the effect of converting the common stock warrants would be anti-dilutive for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and ~~June~~September 30, 2008, basic and diluted loss per share amounts are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

Earnings per share for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, was computed as follows:

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Net income (loss)	$	(91,460	)	$	1,069,064	$	(384,068	) $		894,735
Weighted average shares		20,462,543			20,337,928		20,462,543			20,130,235
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	0.00		$	0.05	$	(0.02	) $		0.04

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008

Net income (loss)	$	(148,487	)	$	(221,049	)	$	(532,556	)	$	673,687

Weighted average shares		20,462,543			20,462,543			20,462,543			20,241,813

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.03

Note 8:

Operating Expenses

The components of operating expenses for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

June 30,

September 30,

2009

2008

2009

2008

Salaries and benefits

~~353~~433,~~102~~051

~~431~~394,~~524~~005

~~726~~1,~~848~~159,899

~~848~~1,~~944~~242,949

Professional fees

4736,~~139~~967

4845,~~791~~730

~~138~~175,~~940~~907

~~161~~207,~~959~~689

Information services

5142,~~914~~568

51109,~~416~~065

~~126~~168,~~175~~743

69178,~~702~~767

Insurance

4140,~~161~~071

42,~~808~~073

83123,~~075~~146

87129,~~029~~102

Supplies and postage

2919,~~379~~401

2227,~~847~~846

5675,~~271~~672

5078,~~902~~748

Stockholder relations

47,~~031~~735

585,~~984~~305

2331,~~937~~672

6369,~~732~~037

Other

8276,~~019~~522

~~110~~103,~~014~~200

~~181~~257,~~202~~724

~~206~~309,~~417~~617

Deferral of origination costs

(5742,~~934~~311

)

(4483,~~469~~164

)

(~~121~~163,~~151~~462

)

(64147,~~216~~380

)

~~550~~614,~~811~~004

~~721~~644,~~915~~060

1,~~215~~829,~~297~~301

12,~~424~~068,~~469~~529

Note 9:

Stock Based Compensation

In connection with the Company appointing J. Kevin Maxwell as its Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer on April 21, 2008, the Company granted Mr. Maxwell 100,000 shares of its common stock. This grant was not made subject to any contractual conditions or restrictions.

Additionally, on April 21, 2008, the Company entered into a Management Compensation Plan with its executive officers, Jerald L. Fenstermaker, Thomas Holgate and J. Kevin Maxwell, pursuant to which these executive officers were granted 200,000, 100,000 and 100,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock. These shares of stock were considered fully vested when granted, but 50% of the shares granted are subject to forfeiture if the Company does not achieve the full year’s operating income for 2008 according to the Company’s board-approved 2008 operating budget, and an additional 50% of the shares granted are subject to forfeiture if the Company does not achieve the full year’s operating income for 2009 according to the board-approved 2009 operating budget. The performance goal for 2008 was achieved. The plan also provides for performance-based cash compensation incentives.

Also, on April 21, 2008, in connection with a new compensation arrangement for the Company’s independent directors (i.e. all directors other than Jerald L. Fenstermaker), the Company also granted 10,000 shares to each of its four independent directors. Each director’s shares became fully vested on March 31, 2009.

The Company determined in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123(R) that the value of all the shares granted to executive officers and directors on April 21, 2008, was $48,600 at the time they were granted, and therefore the Company recognized this amount as compensation expense for these events.

Note 10:

Discontinued Foreign Operations

Prior to May 2008, the Company’s foreign operations, all of which are in Canada, had been conducted through its wholly owned subsidiary, T.C.G. – The Credit Group Inc. (“TCG”), based in Winnipeg, Manitoba. In May 2008, TCG ceased originating new loan purchases and the Company purchased the outstanding receivables of TCG. The Company began servicing the Canadian receivables from its location in the United States, and intends to service them until they are fully collected. The remaining assets of TCG were sold and the Company’s investment in the subsidiary and accumulated foreign exchange gains were liquidated. As a result of the liquidation the Company recognized a $1,380,250 gain in the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Total revenues, loss before taxes, and net loss from foreign operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were as shown below.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008

Total revenues	$	37,417	$	118,400	$	139,425	$	447,188

Income before income taxes	$	34,907	$	81,140	$	92,257	$	84,440

Net income	$	34,907	$	81,140	$	92,257	$	84,440

Per share amount	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Total revenues	$	45,242	$	153,426	$	102,008	$	328,788
Income before income taxes	$	34,346	$	72,677	$	57,350	$	3,300
Net income	$	34,346	$	72,677	$	57,350	$	3,300

Note 11:

Additional Cash Flow Information

The Company made cash interest payments totaling $~~240~~247,~~698~~432 and $~~451~~699,~~898~~331 during the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and made cash interest ~~payments~~ payments totaling $90143,~~551~~895 and $~~134~~278,~~129~~024 during the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2008.

The Company made no cash payments for income taxes during the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008.

Note 12:

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued a ~~Statement~~new ofpronouncement ~~Financial~~regarding ~~Accounting~~fair ~~Standards~~value Nomeasurements. ~~157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements.~~ ~~SFAS~~The pronouncement ~~157~~ clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under ~~SFAS~~the ~~157~~pronouncement, fair ~~value~~ value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. ~~SFAS~~This ~~157~~pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of SFAS No. 115”. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASB’s long-term objectives for accounting for financial instruments. SFAS No. 159 is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. We did not elect to report additional assets and liabilities at fair value other than those required to be accounted for at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, therefore there was no material effect of the adoption of this standard on our financial statements.

InWe ~~December~~adopted ~~2007,~~ the ~~FASB~~provisions ~~issued~~of ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~FASB’s ~~160,~~interpretation ~~Noncontrolling~~regarding ~~Interests~~accounting infor ~~Consolidated~~uncertainty ~~Financial~~in ~~Statements—an~~income ~~amendment~~taxes ofon ~~ARB~~January ~~No.~~1, ~~51 (“SFAS 160”)~~2007. ~~SFAS~~The ~~160~~interpretation ~~(a)~~clarifies ~~amends ARB 51 to establish~~ the accounting ~~and reporting standards~~ for ~~the~~uncertainty ~~noncontrolling interest~~ in ~~a subsidiary and the deconsolidation of a subsidiary; (b) changes the way the consolidated~~ income ~~statement~~ istaxes ~~presented;~~recognized ~~(c) establishes a single method of accounting for changes~~ in a ~~parent~~company’s ~~ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in~~financial ~~deconsolidation;~~statements, ~~(d)~~and ~~requires~~prescribes ~~that~~ a ~~parent~~recognition ~~recognize~~threshold ~~a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated;~~ and ~~(e)~~measurement ~~requires~~process ~~expanded~~for ~~disclosures in the consolidated~~ financial ~~statements~~statement ~~that~~recognition ~~clearly identify~~ and ~~distinguish~~ ~~between~~measurement ~~the interests~~ of ~~the~~a ~~parent’s~~tax ~~owners~~position ~~and~~taken ~~the interests of~~or ~~the~~expected ~~noncontrolling~~to ~~owners~~be oftaken in a ~~subsidiary~~tax return. The ~~accounting~~interpretation ~~provisions~~also ofprovides ~~SFAS~~guidance ~~160~~on ~~must~~derecognition, ~~be applied prospectively~~classification, ~~but~~interest ~~the presentation~~ and ~~disclosure~~penalties, ~~requirements~~accounting ~~must be applied retrospectively to provide comparability~~ in ~~the financial statements. Early adoption is prohibited. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and~~ interim periods ~~within those fiscal years~~, ~~beginning~~disclosure onand ~~or after December 15, 2008~~transition. ~~The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.~~

In ~~December~~February 2007, the FASB issued ~~SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations—~~a ~~replacement of~~pronouncement ~~FASB~~regarding ~~No.~~entities ~~141~~choices ~~(“SFAS~~in ~~141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) requires (a) a~~to ~~company~~measuring tomany ~~recognize~~financial ~~the~~instruments ~~assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,~~ and ~~any noncontrolling~~certain ~~interest~~other initems ~~the acquiree~~ at fair value. The asobjective ofis ~~the~~to ~~acquisition date;~~improve ~~and~~financial ~~(b)~~reporting anby ~~acquirer in preacquisition periods to expense all~~providing ~~acquisition-related~~entities ~~costs,~~with ~~among~~the ~~various~~opportunity ~~other modifications~~ to ~~SFAS~~mitigate ~~No. 141. SFAS~~volatility ~~141(R)~~in ~~requires~~reported ~~that~~earnings ~~any adjustments to an acquired~~caused ~~entity’s~~by ~~deferred~~measuring ~~tax~~related ~~asset~~assets and ~~liability~~liabilities ~~balance~~differently ~~that~~without ~~occur~~having ~~after~~to ~~the~~apply ~~measurement~~complex ~~period~~hedge beaccounting ~~recorded as a component of income tax expense~~provisions. This ~~accounting~~statement ~~treatment~~ is ~~required~~expected ~~for business~~to ~~combinations~~expand ~~consummated before~~ the ~~effective~~use ~~date~~ of ~~SFAS~~fair ~~No.~~value ~~141(R) (non-prospective)~~measurement, ~~otherwise~~which ~~SFAS~~is ~~141(R)~~consistent ~~must~~with bethe ~~applied prospectively. The~~FASB’s ~~presentation~~long-term ~~and~~objectives ~~disclosure~~for ~~requirements~~accounting ~~must~~for ~~be applied retrospectively to provide comparability in the~~ financial ~~statements~~instruments. ~~Early adoption is~~The ~~prohibited. SFAS~~statement ~~141(R)~~ is effective for our fiscal ~~years,~~year ~~and interim~~beginning ~~periods~~January ~~within~~1, 2008. We ~~those~~did ~~fiscal~~not ~~years,~~elect ~~beginning~~to onreport oradditional ~~after~~assets ~~December~~and ~~15,~~liabilities at ~~2008. The~~fair ~~Company~~value ~~has~~other ~~not~~than ~~entered~~those ~~into~~required ~~any~~to ~~transactions~~be ~~requiring disclosure~~accounted ~~under~~for ~~SFAS~~at ~~141(R).~~fair ~~The~~value ~~impact~~prior ofto the adoption this ~~standard~~statement, istherefore ~~dependent~~there ~~upon~~was no material effect of the ~~level~~adoption of ~~future~~this ~~acquisitions,~~standard ifon ~~any~~our financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires companies to provide qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative data about the fair value of gains and losses on derivative contracts, and details of credit-risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions. The statement also requires companies to disclose more information about the location and amounts of derivative instruments in financial statements; how derivatives and related hedges are accounted for under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and how the hedges affect the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has not entered into any transactions requiring disclosure under SFAS 161.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FAS 142-3”). FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). The objective of the FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R). FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

On November 14, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued its long-anticipated proposed International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) roadmap outlining milestones that, if achieved, could lead to mandatory transition to IFRS for U.S. domestic registrants starting in 2014. IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Under the proposed roadmap, the Company could be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and the SEC will make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS for U.S. domestic registrants. Management is currently assessing the impact that this potential change would have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of IFRS.

14In April 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on fair value measurements. The new guidance impacts certain aspects of fair value measurement and related disclosures. The new guidance was effective beginning in the second quarter of 2009. The impact of adopting this new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~new ~~No.~~accounting ~~165~~guidance ~~Subsequent~~on ~~Events.~~subsequent ~~SFAS No~~events. The ~~165~~objective ~~establishes~~of this guidance is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued ~~or available to be issued~~. ~~The~~This ~~statement~~new ~~sets~~accounting ~~forth~~guidance ~~the~~was period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. The statement also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements. Furthermore, this statement identifies the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. It is effective for interim orand annual ~~financial~~ periods ending after June 15, 2009. The ~~adoption~~impact of adopting this ~~statement~~new ~~did~~guidance ~~not~~had ~~have~~no ~~a material~~ effect on ~~our~~the ~~financial~~accompanying ~~position~~condensed orconsolidated ~~results~~financial ~~of operations~~statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance entitled, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“ASC”), which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance has changed how we reference various elements of GAAP when preparing our financial statement disclosures, but did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

Note 13:

Subsequent Events

We have diligently sought a credit facility refinancing or other capital infusion, which would allow us to pay off the ReMark Loan when it matures January 31, 2010, but the only solution that is currently available in the prevailing market conditions is a sale of our loan portfolio.

On September 29, 2009, we entered into an Auto Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “FIFS Purchase Agreement”) with First Investors Financial Services, Inc. (“FIFS”), an unrelated financial services company.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we agreed to sell all or substantially all of our portfolio of subprime used automobile installment sales contracts and other consumer receivables to FIFS for a cash purchase price calculated as the sum of a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of Receivables falling in different classes based upon their aging on the closing date.

The Purchase Agreement provided for a $150,000 breakup fee to FIFS if we terminated the agreement or failed to consummate the Asset Sale.

On October 19, 2009, we entered into an Auto Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “ACA Purchase Agreement”) with American Credit Acceptance, LLC, an unrelated South Carolina limited liability company (“ACA”). As a result of entering into the ACA Purchase Agreement, we terminated the Auto Receivables Purchase Agreement FIFS, Inc.

Pursuant to the ACA Purchase Agreement, we have agreed to sell our portfolio of subprime used automobile installment sales contracts to ACA for a cash purchase price calculated as the sum of a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of Receivables falling in different classes based upon their aging and collectability on the closing date (the “ACA Asset Sale”). The aggregate purchase price payable by ACA for the Receivables is substantially higher than the price FIFS had agreed to pay under the FIFS Purchase Agreement, even after considering the breakup fee required by the FIFS Purchase Agreement.

We intend to use the proceeds from the ACA Asset Sale primarily to pay off our $15 million secured revolving warehouse line of credit (the “Remark Loan”) with ReMark Lending Co. (“Lender”), which had a principal balance of approximately $12 million as of September 30, 2009.

The projected closing date for the ACA Asset Sale is on or before December 15, 2009. Consummation of the ACA Asset Sale is subject to fulfillment of a number of conditions, including approval by our stockholders. There can be no assurance the ACA Asset Sale will close.

The ACA Purchase Agreement provides for a breakup fee of $300,000 to ACA if we elect to terminate or fail to consummate the ACA Asset Sale, unless we terminate the ACA Purchase Agreement because we are able to obtain financing that will allow us to refinance the ReMark Loan.

On October 20, 2009, we provided written notice to FIFS that we have terminated the FIFS Purchase Agreement. We paid a $150,000 breakup fee to FIFS on termination, as required by the FIFS Purchase Agreement.

On October 9, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to our Revolving Loan and Security Agreement with our Lender. Since the Purchase Agreement with FIFS provided for the sale of our receivables at less than the price at which we can purchase new receivables from our independent dealer network, we announced on September 23, 2009 that we were suspending the purchase of new auto loan receivables from our network of independent used automobile dealerships.

The Lender has characterized the Asset Sale and our suspension of receivables purchases as a material adverse change in our business that constitutes an Event of Default and a Funding Termination Event under the Loan Agreement and that, as a consequence, the Lender asserts it is entitled to cease making further advances to us, declare the entire balance of the Remark Loan immediately due and payable, and enforce the Lender’s security interest in all of our assets. We are not in default in the payment of any amount due under the Loan Agreement. The Asset Sale and our suspension of purchasing new auto loan receivables were intended to enable us to pay off the ReMark Loan by the maturity date. We were disappointed that the Lender elected to treat these events as an Event of Default and a Funding Termination Event under the Loan Agreement. Nevertheless, we have agreed to the Amendment in order to avoid an acceleration of the ReMark Loan and the Lender’s sale of all of our assets that secure the ReMark Loan at this time. Pursuant to the Amendment:

We agree that an uncured Event of Default exists and is continuing under the Loan Agreement

The Lender has agreed to forbear from exercising certain default remedies under the Loan Agreement until November 9, 2009

The Lender has the right to appoint a Supervisory Servicer to monitor or take over our receivables servicing function at our expense

All funds coming into the lockbox account, after payment of interest and the fees provided under the Loan Agreement (including those of a Supervisory Servicer if one is appointed), will be applied by the Lender to reduce the principal balance of the ReMark Loan and will not be remitted to us as was the practice under the Loan Agreement before the Amendment. This should result in a more rapid paydown of the ReMark Loan

The Lender will not provide further advances under the ReMark Loan in excess of the $12,042,000 current balance. We had not planned to request additional advances under the ReMark Loan

The Lender will accrue Default Rate Interest equal to the existing rate plus 4.5% commencing September 23, 2009. The existing Note Rate of interest will be payable prior to the expiration of the forbearance period, and the difference between the Note Rate and the Default Rate Interest will be payable after expiration of the forbearance period

The forbearance period will automatically expire on the earlier of (i) November 9, 2009, (ii) any termination of the Asset Sale, (iii) any other Event of Default under the Loan Agreement, or (iv) any default in performance of the Amendment

On November 4, 2009, we entered into an Amendment No. 3 to our Revolving Loan and Security Agreement and Forbearance ("Amendment 3"). The Lender had determined that our pending Asset Sale and our decision on September 23, 2009 to suspend the purchase of new receivables represented a change in our business that constitutes an Event of Default under the Loan and Security Agreement. Pursuant to Amendment 3 and an accompanying letter agreement, the Lender has agreed (a) to consent to the Asset Sale to ACA, and (b) to forbear from exercising its default rights under the Loan Agreement until the earliest of (i) December 15, 2009, (ii) the date on which the ACA Purchase Agreement is terminated, and (iii) a breach of any of the conditions expressed in Amendment 3. Assuming the Asset Sale is approved by our stockholders at the special meeting to be held November 30, 2009, we intend to consummate the Asset Sale and pay off the ReMark Loan by December 15, 2009. Amendment 3 thus gives us the ability to close the Asset Sale and pay off the ReMark Loan before the forbearance period expires, thus avoiding an acceleration of the ReMark Loan and the foreclosure of our assets.

On October 6, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a Plan of Dissolution and Complete Liquidation of the Company (“Plan of Dissolution”).

Pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution we plan to sell and reduce to cash all or substantially all of our non-cash assets (including the receivables being sold in the Asset Sale) and (i) pay or provide for all claims and obligations known to us (including the ReMark Loan), (ii) provide for any claim which is the subject of a pending action, suit or proceeding to which we are a party, (iii) provide for claims that have not been known to us but are likely to arise within 5 years after the Effective Date of our dissolution, (iv) create a contingency reserve to satisfy claims, obligations and expenses incurred in connection with the liquidation, and (vi) distribute any remaining funds to our stockholders.

Our management, Board and financial adviser have tried without success to obtain alternative financing to refinance the ReMark Loan to support our continued operations. To date, however, no such financing has been obtained. Following the payoff of the ReMark Loan, without a substitute credit facility, the Board and management do not believe we will have sufficient capital and assets to operate profitably.

ITEM 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information included or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report, including statements regarding our future financial position or performance, business strategy, budgets, capital commitments and resources, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are considered to be forward-looking statements. Freedom Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “FFG”) cautions that, by their nature, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and contingencies, both known and unknown, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed, contemplated or implied by the forward looking statements, or such risks, uncertainties or contingencies could affect the extent to which a certain plan, objective, projection, estimate or prediction is realized. We express our expectations, beliefs or projections in good faith and believe our expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions; however, we cannot assure you that these expectations, beliefs or projections will prove to have been correct. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following:

(i)

the risks associated with business expansion;

(ii)

our ability to achieve profitable operations;

(iii)

economic and market conditions, including unemployment and underemployment, recession and the risk of adverse economic conditions reducing demand for our products or adversely affecting the credit quality or collectability of our loan portfolio;

(iv)

volatility of market prices and rates that could affect the value of investments or collateral held by the Company as security for the obligations of its customers;

(v)

our ability to obtain debt or equity capital to sustain operations and finance growth;

(vi)

our continued compliance with the financial covenants under our $15 million credit facility, and our ability to renew or refinance the credit facility when it matures in January, 2010;

(vii)

political events, including legislative, regulatory, judicial or other developments that affect the Company;

(viii)

the adequacy of our loss reserves;

(ix)

our ability to compete successfully against competitors with significantly greater financial, marketing and advertising resources than the Company;

(x)

our ability to attract and retain skilled individuals;

(xi)

the pace of technological change and the ability to develop and support technology and information systems, including Internet based systems, sufficient to manage the risks and operations of the Company’s business effectively;

(xii)

risk of litigation filed against the Company; and

(xiii)

inflation/deflation.

Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

1618

For additional information regarding these and other risks, see Item 1A - Risk Factors in our annual report on form 10-K, filed on March 10, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference. Any forward-looking statements made or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q or that we may make from time to time are representative only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You may read and copy such material at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-732-0330 for more information on the public reference room. You can also find our SEC filings at the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. We provide a link on our Web site to the SEC’s Web site to access our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

Overview

We are a consumer finance company specializing in the acquisition, collection and servicing of sub-prime automobile loans purchased primarily from independent used car dealers. We invest significant amounts of cash to acquire motor vehicle installment contracts. We generate cash over the terms of those installment contracts in the form of interest and principal payments we collect.

Our primary source of revenue is interest income generated from our portfolio of installment contracts.

The Company’s former Canadian subsidiary, T.C.G. – The Credit Group, Inc. (TCG”), acquired a variety of consumer installment contracts in previous years, including small ticket leases, loans secured by home appliances and other consumer goods, and loans for bulk food purchases. During 2008, the subsidiary was liquidated and the Company purchased TCG’s outstanding portfolio of installment contracts. The Company intends to service the Canadian portfolio until the remaining balances are fully collected or liquidated in some other manner. The Company’s portfolio of outstanding installment contracts has been increasingly comprised of sub-prime automobile loans. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2009, the Company’s loan portfolio consisted of over 98% sub-prime ~~automobile~~ automobile loans.

The Company plans to continue to devote the majority of its marketing resources and efforts to acquiring sub-prime automobile loans. The Company’s management intends to focus on the following:

(1) Consistently acquiring sub-prime automobile-secured installment contracts, through our point-of-sale programs, that meet the Company’s underwriting guidelines;

(2) Obtaining additional outside debt and/or equity financing to meet the Company’s future cash requirements;

(3) Minimizing the credit losses in the installment contracts portfolio; and

(4) Monitoring key performance measures, including cost per loan acquired, book to look ratio (computed as the number of contracts acquired compared to the number of credit applications received/reviewed), turnaround time for responding to credit applications submitted by dealers, and turnaround time for funding a loan package submitted by a dealer.

The Company’s management continues to monitor the impact of current economic conditions on the Company. We continuously scrutinize delinquency rates, vehicle repossessions, bankruptcies, and other data for trends that may require us to update our underwriting standards, increase our reserve for bad debts, or take some other action. We regularly observe unemployment statistics and information regarding worker layoffs for major employers in areas we offer our financing programs that would necessitate an appropriate action, such as offering extensions or loan modifications, on a case by case basis, to borrowers who have suffered temporary income disruptions. Currently, less than 6% of the Company’s installment contracts have been modified or extended. We do not expect loan modifications or extensions to increase significantly as a percent of the total loan portfolio during 2009. A prolonged economic recession could adversely affect our ability to acquire suitable installment contracts. Continued weakness in the economy could adversely affect our business and that of the dealers from which we purchase contracts and result in reductions in our revenues.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company considers the determination of the allowance for credit losses to involve a higher degree of subjective judgment and complexity than its other significant accounting policies. The allowance for credit losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining an allowance for credit losses that management believes is adequate to absorb reasonably estimable probable losses in the Company’s portfolio of installment contracts. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is based on periodic evaluations of the Company’s portfolio of finance receivables, credit loss history, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including, among others, expected default probabilities, value of collateral, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on delinquent loans, estimated losses and general amounts for historical loss experience. The process also considers prevailing and expected future economic conditions, uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the installment contracts portfolio. All of these factors may be subject to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for credit losses may be required that would adversely impact our earnings in future periods. See Item 2, MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, under the headings Results of Operations – Provision for Credit Losses and Financial Condition – Asset Quality.

This evaluation is based on a review of various quantitative and qualitative analyses. Quantitative analyses include the review of all loans charged-off by asset class, static pool analysis by month of acquisition and by dealer, review of delinquency trends, and analysis of the historical cumulative losses in the portfolio. Other quantitative analyses include a review of the current delinquency ratios and an analysis of the relative size of each asset class in relation to historical amounts. Qualitative analyses include an assessment of prevailing and anticipated economic conditions, trends in deficiency balance collections, trends in the number of loan modifications and extensions, trends in average borrower credit scores and trends in the percentage of balances recovered through sale of collateral.

1820

Selected Portfolio Statistics

The following table presents selected unaudited portfolio statistics for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008. This table should be be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and ~~the~~ the notes thereto, included herein.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended June
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	June 30,						30,
	2009				2008*		2009				2008*
	2009				2008 *		2009				2008 *
Installment contracts acquired (total principal amount)	$	1,979,701		$	4,938,542		$	8,284,656		$	9,568,555
Installment contracts acquired (total principal
Purchase price of Installment contracts Acquired	$	1,834,514		$	4,675,904		$	7,722,658		$	9,066,504
amount)	$	2,839,948		$	3,077,478		$	6,304,956		$	5,115,911
Percentage of dollar amount paid to principal balance acquired		92.67	%		94.68	%		93.22	%		94.75	%
Purchase price of Installment contracts
Number of installment contracts acquired during the quarter		193			450			766			870
Acquired	$	2,644,357		$	2,922,811		$	5,888,144		$	4,852,299
Average principal balance acquired	$	10,258		$	10,975		$	10,815		$	10,998
Percentage of dollar amount paid to principal
Acquisition cost per acquired installment contract (US only)	$	914		$	679		$	839		$	677
balance acquired		93.11	%		94.97	%		93.39	%		94.85	%
Monthly servicing cost per installment contract (US only)	$	9.12		$	15.74		$	11.31		$	21.94
Number of installment contracts acquired
during the quarter		260			281			573			504
Average principal balance acquired	$	10,923		$	10,952		$	11,003		$	10,151
Acquisition cost per acquired installment
contract (including overhead, US only)	$	834		$	756		$	814		$	774
Monthly servicing cost per installment contract (including overhead, US only)	$	11.74		$	23.39		$	12.42		$	26.29

* Purchases of Canadian finance receivables were discontinued in May 2008.

Results of Operations

Interest Income

Our interest income totaled $1,~~053~~074,~~766~~703 and $23,~~027~~102,~~557~~260 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $~~649~~789,~~990~~875 and $12,~~272~~062,~~912~~ 787 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008. The increase in interest income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 as compared to 2008 is attributed primarily to the increase in the installment contract portfolio in the United States, offset by a decline in the outstanding balance of the Canadian installment loan portfolio and lower yields on installment contracts experienced in 2009.

1921

The following tables present information relative to the average balances and interest rates of our interest earning assets for the three and ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ ~~June~~ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

2009

2008

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

Balance

Income

Yield

Balance

Income

Yield

Installment Contracts

18,~~382~~745,~~803~~592

1,~~052~~074,~~943~~353

22.~~91%~~92

1013,~~948~~138,~~199~~352

~~641~~781,~~091~~443

23.~~42%~~79

Cash and cash equivalents

12,~~997~~167,~~572~~234

~~823~~350

0.~~16%~~06

21,~~159~~764,~~137~~458

8,~~899~~432

1.~~65%~~91

Total

20,~~380~~912,~~374~~826

1,~~053~~074,~~766~~703

20.~~68%~~56

1314,~~107~~902,~~336~~810

~~649~~789,~~990~~875

1921.~~84%~~20

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

2009

2008

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

Balance

Income

Yield

Balance

Income

Yield

Installment Contracts

1718,~~816~~100,~~350~~726

23,~~025~~099,~~123~~476

22.~~73%~~83

1011,~~707~~576,~~955~~767

12,~~251~~032,~~270~~713

23.~~37%~~41

Cash and cash equivalents

2,~~021~~060,~~074~~729

2,~~434~~784

0.~~24%~~18

2,~~147~~026,~~192~~838

2130,~~642~~074

21.~~02%~~98

Total

1920,~~837~~161,~~424~~455

23,~~027~~102,~~557~~260

20.~~44%~~52

1213,~~855~~603,~~147~~605

12,~~272~~062,~~912~~787

1920.~~80%~~22

The decrease in yield on our installment contracts isfor ~~primarily~~ the ~~result~~three ofand annine months ~~increase~~ended inSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~amortization of deferred origination costs during~~ 2009, ~~and changes~~compared into the ~~mix~~three ofand ~~our~~nine ~~portfolio. Beginning~~months ~~January~~ended 1September 30, 2008, ~~the Company~~is ~~adopted~~primarily ~~Financial~~the ~~Accounting~~result ~~Standard~~of ~~No.~~an ~~91,~~increase ~~Accounting~~in ~~for Nonrefundable~~the ~~Fees~~amortization ~~and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs~~ of ~~Leases (“SFAS91”). Loan costs~~ deferred ~~under~~ ~~SFAS~~origination 91costs ~~are~~during ~~amortized~~2009, asand anchanges ~~offset~~in ~~to interest income over~~ the ~~expected outstanding~~mix ~~terms~~ of ~~the loans~~our portfolio. Amortization of ~~SFAS~~deferred 91origination costs amounted to $4548,~~508~~674 and $83132,~~462~~136 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively, and $1229,~~357~~371 and $1545,~~889~~330 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2008, respectively. In addition, throughout 2008 and 2009 our portfolio of installment contracts has been increasingly comprised of contracts ~~acquired~~ acquired through our United States point-of-sale automobile financing programs. These contracts typically have lower yields than the other types of contracts in our portfolio, among them, automobile contracts acquired in bulk purchase transactions, and contracts purchased by our former Canadian subsidiary which include small ticket leases, loans secured by home appliances and other consumer goods, and loans for bulk food purchases.

The following table sets forth the changes in interest income attributable to changes in volume (change in average balance multiplied by the prior period yield) and changes in rate (change in yield multiplied by the prior period average balance). Changes due to the rate/volume variance (the combined effect of change in yield and change in average balance) have been allocated proportionately based on the absolute value of the rate and volume variances.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to
	the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Volume			Rate			Total
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Installment Contracts	$	425,588		$	(12,319	)	$	413,269
Cash and cash equivalents		(719	)		(8,774	)		(9,493	)
Total Interest Income	$	424,869		$	(21,093	)	$	403,776

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to the

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

Volume

Rate

Total

Increase (decrease) in interest income:

Installment Contracts

~~808~~320,~~877~~231

(3527,~~026~~321

)

~~773~~292,~~851~~910

Cash and cash equivalents

(12,~~201~~500

)

(1810,~~005~~582

)

(198,~~206~~082

)

Total Interest Income

~~807~~322,~~676~~731

(5337,~~031~~903

)

~~754~~284,~~645~~828

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008

	Volume		Rate			Total
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Installment Contracts	$	1,086,160	$	(19,397	)	$	1,066,763
Cash and cash equivalents		165		(27,455	)		(27,290	)

Total Interest Income	$	1,086,325	$	(46,852	)	$	1,039,473

Interest Expense

We incurred interest expense of $~~311~~331,~~745~~068, including $72,252 amortization of deferred financing fees, and $~~173~~213,~~834~~585, including $72,252 amortization of deferred financing fees, during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We incurred interest expense of $~~596~~927,~~808~~876, ~~including~~ including $~~144~~216,~~504~~755 amortization of deferred financing fees, and $~~277~~490,~~039~~624, ~~including~~ including $~~122~~194,~~048~~300 amortization of deferred financing fees, during the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our interest expense increased primarily because of the increase in the outstanding balance of our line of credit from ~~June~~September 30, 2008 to ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

Provision for Credit Losses

Our provision for credit losses totaled $~~322~~323,~~749~~214 and $~~679~~1,~~605~~002,819 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $~~108~~196,~~794~~704 and $~~140~~337,~~414~~118 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, respectively. The increase in the provision for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared to the three months and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2008 is a result of a reduction of our reserve for credit losses in the first quarter of 2008, and an increase in net charge-offs in 2009 as compared to 2008. The Company assigned senior management to its account servicing and collection department in the fourth quarter of 2007, and, as a result of the improved reporting and controls over the loan losses implemented by senior management, the Company experienced an improvement in delinquencies during the first quarter of 2008. Because of this improvement in delinquencies, the Company reduced its reserve for credit losses through a lower charge to the provision during the first quarter of 2008. Net charge-offs increased in 2009 due to 1) an increase in charge-offs experienced in the first quarter of 2009, which was a result of a significant number of vehicles repossessed in late 2008, 2) approximately $124,000 in recoveries received in the first quarter 2008 on receivables that had been charged off in 2007, and 3) because of the overall growth in size of the Company’s loan portfolio from 2008 to 2009. Net charge-offs increased to $~~251~~328,~~184~~814 and $~~560~~888,~~027~~841 for the three months and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 ~~and June 30~~, ~~2008, respectively,~~ from $83218,~~967~~504 and $~~270~~488,~~167~~671 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, respectively. As a percent of net contracts net charge-offs were 57.4702% and 6.2939% for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to 36.0765% and 5.0563% for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2008, respectively. See Item 2, MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION ~~AND~~ AND ANALYSIS, under the heading Financial Condition – Asset Quality for a discussion of the Company’s delinquencies and actual credit loss experience and its allowance for credit losses. As the Company continues to acquire installment contracts, and our average contracts receivable outstanding increases, we expect the charge to our earnings for credit losses will continue to increase.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses totaled $~~550~~614,~~811~~004 and $1,~~215~~829,~~297~~301 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $~~721~~644,~~915~~060 and $12,~~424~~068,~~469~~ 528 for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, respectively. A summary of these expenses follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
							Percent									Percent
	2009			2008			Percent Change			2009			2008			Percent Change
	2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
Salaries and benefits	$	433,051		$	394,005			9.91	%	$	1,159,899		$	1,242,949			-6.68	%
Salaries and benefits	$	353,102		$	431,524			-18.17%		$	726,848		$	848,944			-14.38%
Professional fees		36,967			45,730			-19.16	%		175,907			207,689			-15.30	%
Professional fees		47,139			48,791			-3.39%			138,940			161,959			-14.21%
Information services		42,568			109,065			-60.97	%		168,743			178,767			-5.61	%
Information services		51,914			51,416			0.97%			126,175			69,702			81.02%
Insurance		40,071			42,073			-4.76	%		123,146			129,102			-4.61	%
Insurance		41,161			42,808			-3.85%			83,075			87,029			-4.54%
Supplies and postage		19,401			27,846			-30.33	%		75,672			78,748			-3.91	%
Supplies and postage		29,379			22,847			28.59%			56,271			50,902			10.55%
Stockholder relations		7,735			5,305			45.81	%		31,672			69,037			-54.12	%
Stockholder relations		4,031			58,984			-93.17%			23,937			63,732			-62.44%
Other		76,522			103,200			-25.85	%		257,724			309,617			-16.76	%
Other		82,019			110,014			-25.45%			181,202			206,417			-12.22%
Deferral of origination costs		(42,311	)		(83,164	)		-49.12	%		(163,462	)		(147,380	)		10.91	%
Deferral of origination costs		(57,934	)		(44,469	)		30.28%			(121,151	)		(64,216	)		88.66%
Total	$	614,004		$	644,060			-4.67	%	$	1,829,301		$	2,068,529			-11.57	%
Total	$	550,811		$	721,915			-23.70%		$	1,215,297		$	1,424,469			-14.68%

22Salaries and benefits increased for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 2008 because of severance costs associated with the dismissal of our loan marketing and underwriting staff in September, 2009, offset by a decrease in employee costs resulting from fewer individuals being employed by the Company in 2009 as compared to the prior year. Salaries and benefits decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to 2008 because of fewer individuals employed by the Company in 2009 as compared to 2008, employee relocation expenses that occurred in 2008 that did not recur in 2009, and stock grants to the Company’s management that occurred in 2008 that did not recur in 2009. Professional fees decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the December 31, 2008 accrual of fiscal 2008 audit fees, offset by examination fees billed by our lender during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. Information services decreased for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 2008, as a result of lower loan origination and underwriting system usage fees incurred because of the decrease in origination volume experienced during these periods. Stockholder relations decreased for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily because of the elimination of stockholder solicitation costs as a result of the reduced quorum requirement approved by the Company’s stockholders in 2008, and the systematic accrual of annual meeting expenses beginning in the 4th quarter of 2008. Supplies and postage decreased during the three month period ended September 30, 2009 as compared to 2008, because of the decrease in volume of installment contracts purchased during the period. Deferred Origination Costs decreased as a result of a decrease in the number of loans acquired during the three month period ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the three month period ended September 30, 2008. Deferred Origination Costs increased however, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 as a result of additional origination costs identified for deferral. Other operating costs include, among other items, occupancy costs, licenses and taxes, depreciation, communications, and travel. Other costs have decreased primarily as a result of the liquidation of our Canadian subsidiary in May 2008 and the elimination of costs related to the subsidiary.

Salaries and benefits decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 2008 because of a decrease in employee costs resulting from 21% fewer individuals being employed by the Company in 2009 as compared to the prior year, employee relocation expenses that occurred in 2008 that did not recur in 2009, and stock grants to the Company’s management that occurred in 2008 that did not recur in 2009. These decreases were offset by an increase in sales commissions paid in 2009 to individuals employed by the Company to market our financing programs. As the Company continues to grow, however, we expect our salaries and benefits costs to increase, but anticipate that as a percentage of total revenues these costs will continue to decrease. Professional fees decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 as a result of the December 31, 2008 accrual of fiscal 2008 audit fees, offset by examination fees billed by our lender during the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Information services increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 2008, as a result of the Company’s implementation of installment loan origination and underwriting systems during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and ongoing costs incurred as a result of the use of these systems. Insurance expense decreased because of a decrease in premiums for Directors and Officers insurance, and because of the elimination of insurance premiums for coverage on our former Canadian office building, which was sold in June 2008. Stockholder relations decreased for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily because of the elimination of stockholder solicitation costs as a result of the reduced quorum requirement approved by the Company’s stockholders in 2008, and the systematic accrual of annual meeting expenses beginning in the 4th quarter of 2008. Supplies and postage costs increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, as compared to 2008 as a result of the increase in size of our loan portfolio. Deferred Origination Costs increased as a result of an increase in the number of loans acquired during the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2008, and as a result of additional origination costs identified for deferral. Other operating costs include, among other items, occupancy costs, licenses and taxes, depreciation, communications, and travel. Other costs have decreased primarily as a result of the liquidation of our Canadian subsidiary in May 2008 and the elimination of costs related to the subsidiary.24

~~Our~~The ~~growth~~Company’s ~~plan~~average cost to acquire an installment contract (which includes all direct marketing, ifbusiness ~~achieved~~development and underwriting expenses and an allocation of certain overhead costs) during the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, ~~will~~2009 ~~cause~~was ~~our~~approximately ~~operating~~$914 and $839, respectively, per contract as compared to $679 and $677 for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively. This increase in average acquisition cost is a result of usage costs related to loan origination and underwriting systems utilized during 2009 which were not utilized by the Company until beginning in June 2008 and lower loan acquisition volume experienced in 2009 compared to 2008. These increases have been offset by an improvement in the Company’s book to look ratio during the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2009. For the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, the Company’s book to look ratio was 5.24% and 4.87%, respectively, compared to 4.43% and 4.19% for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008. Management is attempting to further increase ~~over~~this ~~time~~ratio, and thereby reduce our average acquisition cost, by ~~but~~training asour customers to send the Company only those credit applications that have a ~~percent~~high probability of ~~revenues~~being weapproved ~~expect~~and ~~these~~purchased ~~costs~~by tous, ~~continue~~and by following up on approved applications to encourage the placement of the financing applied ~~decrease~~for with us instead of with a competitor.

The Company’s average monthly cost to ~~acquire~~service an ~~installment~~Installment ~~contract~~Contract (which includes all direct ~~marketing,~~collections ~~business development~~ and ~~underwriting~~servicing expenses and an allocation of certain overhead costs) during the three month and ~~six~~nine month periods ended September ~~June~~ 30, 2009 was ~~approximately~~ $~~834~~9.12 and $~~814~~11.31, respectively, per serviced contract, as compared to $~~756~~15.74 and $~~774~~21.94 ~~for~~during the three month and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, respectively. ~~This~~The ~~increase~~decrease infor ~~average acquisition cost is a result of usage costs related to loan origination and underwriting systems utilized during 2009 which were not utilized by~~ the ~~Company~~quarter ~~until~~ended ~~beginning~~September in30, ~~June 2008 and higher payroll costs in our loan acquisition department during~~ 2009. ~~These~~reflects ~~increases~~a ~~have~~restructure ~~been~~of ~~offset by an improvement in~~ the Company’s ~~book~~account servicing todepartment ~~look~~which ~~ratio~~resulted ~~during~~in ~~the~~gains ~~three~~in ~~and six month period ended June 30~~efficiency, ~~2009. For the three month~~ and ~~six~~investments ~~month periods ended June 30, 2009,~~that ~~the~~have ~~Company’s~~resulted ~~book~~in tolower ~~look ratio was 5.47% and 4.75%~~delinquencies, ~~respectively,~~fewer ~~compared~~charge-offs ~~to 4.10%~~ and ~~3.96%~~added ~~for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2008~~capacity. Management isanticipates ~~attempting~~that ~~to further increase~~ this ~~ratio, and thereby reduce our~~ average ~~acquisition~~servicing cost, byper ~~training~~contract ~~our~~will continue ~~customers~~ to ~~send the~~decrease ~~Company~~as ~~only~~the ~~those~~size ~~credit~~of ~~applications~~the ~~that~~portfolio ~~have a high probability~~ of ~~being~~installment contracts ~~approved~~increases ~~and~~due ~~purchased by us, and by following up on approved applications~~ to ~~encourage~~ ~~the~~continued ~~placement~~efficiency ofgains ~~the~~and ~~financing~~economies ~~applied for with us instead~~ of ~~with a competitor~~scale.

The Company’s average monthly cost to service an Installment Contract (which includes all direct collections and servicing expenses and an allocation of certain overhead costs) during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 was $11.74 and $12.42, respectively, per serviced contract, as compared to $23.39 and $26.29 during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The decrease for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 reflects a restructure of the Company’s account servicing department which resulted in gains in efficiency, and investments that have resulted in lower delinquencies, fewer charge-offs and added capacity. Management anticipates that this average servicing cost per contract will continue to decrease as the size of the portfolio of installment contracts increases due to continued efficiency gains and economies of scale.

The Company formally tracks our response time for responding to credit applications received and our response time for funding loan packages submitted by dealers, and we monitor these statistics on a daily basis. Our goal is to reduce these response times to better serve the needs of our customers. We believe that reducing these response times will also reduce our overall costs of underwriting and funding.

Financial Condition

Installment Contracts Portfolio

The Company acquired Installment Contracts with outstanding principal balances totaling $21,~~839~~979,~~948~~701 and $68,~~304~~284,~~956~~656, respectively, during the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. We invested cash of approximately $21,~~644~~834,~~357~~514 and $57,~~888~~722,~~144~~658, respectively, to acquire these contracts. As a result of these acquisitions, our portfolio of Installment Contracts increased from $15,938,361, net of an allowance for credit losses of $639,799, at December 31, 2008 to $17,~~927~~894,~~188~~729, net of an allowance for credit losses of $~~762~~763,~~371~~541, at ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

All of the Company’s installment contracts are held for investment and are recorded at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for unamortized purchase discounts and an allowance for credit losses. Discounts on purchased installment contracts are recognized as income over the respective contractual terms using methods that approximate the interest method. A summary of our installment contracts portfolio as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows:25

	June 30, 2009						December 31, 2008
	United States		Canada		Total		United States		Canada		Total
Automobiles	$	18,998,787	$	323,565	$	19,322,352	$	16,327,262	$	514,603	$	16,841,865
Other		-		268,780		268,780		-		466,626		466,626
Total		18,998,787		592,345		19,591,132		16,327,262		981,229		17,308,491
Less
Unearned discount		895,893		5,680		901,573		718,717		11,614		730,331
Allowance for credit losses		682,051		80,320		762,371		569,794		70,005		639,799
Net	$	17,420,843	$	506,345	$	17,927,188	$	15,038,751	$	899,610	$	15,938,361

	September 30, 2009						December 31, 2008
	United States		Canada		Total		United States		Canada		Total
Automobiles	$	19,061,077	$	275,285	$	19,336,362	$	16,327,262	$	514,603	$	16,841,865
Other		-		231,731		231,731		-		466,626		466,626
Total		19,061,077		507,016		19,568,093		16,327,262		981,229		17,308,491

Less

Unearned discount		905,174		4,649		909,823		718,717		11,614		730,331
Allowance for
credit losses		686,826		76,715		763,541		569,794		70,005		639,799
Net	$	17,469,077	$	425,652	$	17,894,729	$	15,038,751	$	899,610	$	15,938,361

Asset Quality

Substantially all of the installment contracts we ~~acquire~~have acquired are considered sub-prime and ~~are~~ are subject to a high degree of risk of default by the obligors. We define sub-prime installment contracts as those entered into with borrowers that have credit scores below 620, or due to other circumstances, such borrowers have limited or no access to traditional sources of consumer credit.

Charge-offs directly impact our earnings and cash flows. To minimize the amount of credit losses we incur, we monitor delinquent accounts, promptly repossess and remarket collateral, attempt to collect deficiency balances, and employ other servicing and collection techniques as we deem appropriate.

We calculate delinquency based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. The following table sets forth information with respect to the delinquency of our portfolio of installment contracts as of ~~June~~September 30, ~~2009~~ 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:

	June 30, 2009
	United States				Canada				Total
	Amount		Pct.		Amount		Pct.		Amount		Pct.
Installment Contracts		18,998,787		100%		592,346		100%		19,591,133		100%
Period of delinquency:
31 - 60 days		304,607		1.60%		9,530		1.61%		314,137		1.60%
61 - 90 days		119,576		0.63%		8,454		1.43%		128,030		0.65%
91 – 120 days		62,995		0.33%		12,663		2.14%		75,658		0.39%
121+ days		85,637		0.45%		163		0.03%		85,800		0.44%
Total		572,815		3.01%		30,810		5.21%		603,625		3.08%

	December 31, 2008
	United States				Canada				Total
	Amount		Pct.		Amount		Pct.		Amount		Pct.
Installment Contracts		16,327,262		100%		981,228		100%		17,308,490		100%
Period of delinquency:
31 - 60 days		392,693		2.41%		70,388		7.17%		463,081		2.68%
61 - 90 days		228,915		1.40%		33,887		3.45%		262,802		1.52%
91 – 120 days		38,276		0.23%		34,230		3.49%		72,506		0.42%
121+ days		51,720		0.32%		7,317		0.75%		59,037		0.34%
Total		711,604		4.36%		145,822		14.86%		857,426		4.96%

At December 31, 2008, delinquent accounts, defined as accounts more than 30 days contractually past due, totaled 4.96% of our outstanding installment contracts. Delinquencies declined as of June 30, 2009 to 3.08% of our outstanding installment contracts. The decrease is attributable to the Company’s devotion of senior management personnel to its account servicing and collection efforts. New controls and systems were implemented by management beginning in 2008 to better monitor delinquent accounts, resulting in fewer delinquencies and credit losses. We expect delinquencies as a percent of the total portfolio in the United States to remain constant throughout 2009, unless continued adverse economic conditions cause higher unemployment or underemployment, or an increase in consumer prices (such as fuel), or some other significant event occurs that affects our borrowers’ ability to make their payments.

The following tables set forth information with respect to actual credit loss experience in our portfolio of installment contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009									2008
	United States			Canada			Total			United States			Canada			Total
Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, end of period	$	18,102,893		$	586,666		$	18,689,559		$	9,879,209		$	1,862,213		$	11,741,422
Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, average during the period (1)		17,703,333			679,470			18,382,803			8,901,432			2,046,767			10,948,199
Gross charge-offs		495,679			19,169			514,848			231,978			27,477			259,455
Recoveries		250,420			13,244			263,664			164,182			11,306			175,488
Net charge-offs		245,259			5,925			251,184			67,796			16,171			83,967
Net charge-offs as a % of avg. contracts during the period (annualized)		5.54	%		3.49	%		5.47	%		3.05	%		3.16	%		3.07	%

(1) - Average is based on month-end balances

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009									2008
	United States			Canada			Total			United States			Canada			Total
Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, end of period	$	18,102,893		$	586,666		$	18,689,559		$	9,879,209		$	1,862,214		$	11,741,423
Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, average during the period (1)		17,051,715			764,634			17,816,349			8,504,084			2,203,870			10,707,954
Gross charge-offs		1,017,035			49,414			1,066,449			722,840			78,198			801,038
Recoveries		488,013			18,409			506,422			500,554			30,317			530,871
Net charge-offs		529,022			31,005			560,027			222,286			47,881			270,167
Net charge-offs as a % of avg. contracts during the period (annualized)		6.20	%		8.11	%		6.29	%		5.23	%		4.35	%		5.05	%

(1) - Average is based on month-end balances

The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses at an amount it believes is adequate to absorb reasonably estimable probable losses in its portfolio of installment contracts. The Company’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses on a regular basis. In performing these periodic evaluations, management follows an appropriately-documented methodology. This methodology requires management to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses based on a review of various quantitative and qualitative analyses as described in Item 2, MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, under the heading Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates. The Company incurs a charge against its earnings, as a provision for credit losses, based on this analysis as described in Item 2, MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, under the heading Results of Operations – Provision for Credit Losses.

	September 30, 2009
	United States					Canada					Total
	Amount		Pct.			Amount		Pct.			Amount		Pct.

Installment Contracts		19,061,077		100	%		507,016		100	%		19,568,093		100	%

Period of delinquency:
31 - 60 days		386,723		2.03	%		44,068		8.69	%		430,791		2.20	%
61 - 90 days		239,490		1.26	%		11,046		2.18	%		250,536		1.28	%
91 – 120 days		116,511		0.61	%		678		0.13	%		117,189		0.60	%
121+ days		68,179		0.36	%		-		0.00	%		68,179		0.35	%

Total		810,903		4.24	%		55,792		11.01	%		866,695		4.43	%

Our allowance for credit losses was $762,371 at June 30, 2009 compared to $639,799 at December 31, 2008. As a percentage of our outstanding net Installment Contracts, our allowance for credit losses was 4.08% at June 30, 2009 and 3.86% at December 31, 2008. The allowance for credit losses was 15.86% and 24.35% of past due accounts and 126.30% and 134.25% of accounts considered delinquent as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively.

	December 31, 2008
	United States					Canada					Total
	Amount		Pct.			Amount		Pct.			Amount		Pct.

Installment Contracts		16,327,262		100	%		981,228		100	%		17,308,490		100	%

Period of delinquency:
31 - 60 days		392,693		2.41	%		70,388		7.17	%		463,081		2.68	%
61 - 90 days		228,915		1.40	%		33,887		3.45	%		262,802		1.52	%
91 – 120 days		38,276		0.23	%		34,230		3.49	%		72,506		0.42	%
121+ days		51,720		0.32	%		7,317		0.75	%		59,037		0.34	%

Total		711,604		4.36	%		145,822		14.86	%		857,426		4.96	%

~~During~~At ~~the~~December ~~six~~31, ~~months~~2008, ~~ended~~delinquent ~~June 30~~accounts, ~~2009,~~defined ~~our~~as ~~net~~accounts ~~Installment~~more ~~Contracts~~than ~~increased~~30 days $2contractually past due,~~111,399~~ totaled 4. ~~This~~96% ~~increase~~of ~~was~~our ~~the~~outstanding ~~result~~installment contracts. Delinquencies declined as of aSeptember $230,~~305,190~~ ~~increase~~2009 into 4.43% ~~automobile-secured~~of our outstanding installment contracts. The ~~offset~~decrease byis attributable ato ~~$193,791~~the ~~decrease~~Company’s indevotion ~~all~~of ~~other~~senior management personnel to its ~~Installment~~account ~~Contracts~~servicing and collection efforts. ~~The~~ ~~$2,305,190~~New ~~increase~~controls inand ~~automobile-secured~~systems were ~~Installment~~implemented ~~Contracts~~by ~~was~~management ~~comprised~~beginning ofin a2008 $2to better monitor delinquent accounts,~~503,874~~ ~~increase~~resulting in ~~Installment Contracts~~fewer ~~acquired~~delinquencies ~~through~~and ~~our~~credit Ulosses.S. ~~point-~~We expect delinquencies as a percent of~~-sale~~ ~~program~~the ~~offset~~total byportfolio ain ~~$189,157~~the United States to remain ~~decrease~~constant inthroughout ~~Installment~~2009, ~~Contracts~~unless ~~acquired~~continued ~~through~~adverse ~~our~~economic ~~Canadian~~conditions ~~point-of-sale~~cause ~~program,~~higher ~~and~~unemployment aor $9underemployment,~~527~~ ~~decrease~~or an increase in ~~Installment~~consumer ~~Contracts~~prices ~~acquired~~(such as ~~through~~fuel), ~~bulk~~or some other significant event occurs that affects our borrowers’ ~~purchases~~ability to make their payments.

The Company’s loss history in its U.S. portfolio of installment contracts and in its Canadian portfolio of automobile-secured installment contracts is limited. Due to this limited operating history, using historical loss ratios to predict future probable losses is of limited usefulness. Additionally, uncertainty exists with respect to the accuracy of our estimates of amounts we will recover through the sale of repossessed collateral and with respect to anticipated future economic conditions, both in the U.S. and Canada, and their effect on the performance of our portfolio of installment contracts. For these reasons, our historical loss ratios may not be relied upon as predictions of the future performance of our portfolio or our future loss experience.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we experienced net charge-offs of $560,027, which represented 6.29% of our average outstanding installment contracts during the period. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we experienced net charge-offs of $751,578, which represented 5.96% of our average outstanding installment contracts during the year.

The allowance for credit losses as of June 30, 2009 of $762,371 is 4.08% of our outstanding net installment contracts. Based on the analyses we performed related to our allowance for credit losses as described above and as described in Item 2, MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, under the heading Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments, we believe that our allowance for credit losses is adequate to cover probable losses that can be reasonably estimated as of June 30, 2009.

The following tables set forth the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009									2008
										United
	United States			Canada			Total			States			Canada			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	613,086		$	72,131		$	685,217		$	527,753		$	122,460		$	650,213
Charge-offs		(495,679	)		(19,169	)		(514,848	)		(231,978	)		(27,477	)		(259,455	)
Recoveries		250,420			13,244			263,664			164,182			11,306			175,488
Net charge-offs		(245,259	)		(5,925	)		(251,184	)		(67,796	)		(16,171	)		(83,967	)
Provision for credit losses		314,224			8,525			322,749			109,837			(1,043	)		108,794
Effect of foreign currency translation		-			5,589			5,589						900			900
Balance at end of period	$	682,051		$	80,320		$	762,371		$	569,794		$	106,146		$	675,940

The following tables set forth information with respect to actual credit loss experience in our portfolio of installment contracts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2009									2008
										United
	United States			Canada			Total			United States			Canada			Total
	United States			Canada			Total			States			Canada			Total
Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, end of period	$	18,155,903		$	502,367		$	18,658,270		$	13,281,120		$	1,404,854		$	14,685,974
Balance at beginning of period	$	569,794		$	70,005		$	639,799		$	670,222		$	141,154		$	811,376
Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, average during the period (1)		18,202,108			543,484			18,745,592			11,510,460			1,627,893			13,138,353
Charge-offs		(1,017,035	)		(49,414	)		(1,066,449	)		(722,840	)		(78,198	)		(801,038	)
Gross charge-offs		532,243			14,383			546,626			330,190			54,409			384,599
Recoveries		~~488~~213,~~013~~804			184,~~409~~008			~~506~~217,~~422~~812			~~500~~162,~~554~~787			303,~~317~~308			~~530~~166,~~871~~095
Net charge-offs		~~(529~~318,~~022~~439	)		~~(31~~10,~~005~~375	)		~~(560~~328,~~027~~814	)		~~(222~~167,~~286~~403	)		~~(47~~51,~~881~~101	)		~~(270~~218,~~167~~504	)
Provision for credit losses		641,279			38,326			679,605			121,858			18,556			140,414
Net charge-offs as a % of avg. contracts during the period (annualized)		7.00	%		7.64	%		7.02	%		5.82	%		12.56	%		6.65	%
Effect of foreign currency translation		-			2,994			2,994			-			(5,683	)		(5,683	)
(1) - Average is based on month-end balances
Balance at end of period	$	682,051		$	80,320		$	762,371		$	569,794		$	106,146		$	675,940

Liquidity and Capital Resources

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009									2008
	United States			Canada			Total			United States			Canada			Total

Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, end of period	$	18,155,903		$	502,367		$	18,658,270		$	13,281,120		$	1,404,854		$	14,685,974

Installment Contracts, net of unearned discounts, average during the period (1)		17,931,267			615,022			18,546,289			9,569,122			2,007,645			11,576,767

Gross charge-offs		1,549,278			63,797			1,613,075			1,053,030			132,607			1,185,637
Recoveries		701,817			22,417			724,234			663,341			33,625			696,966

Net charge-offs		847,461			41,380			888,841			389,689			98,982			488,671

Net charge-offs as a % of avg. contracts during the period (annualized)		6.30	%		8.97	%		6.39	%		5.43	%		6.57	%		5.63	%

(1) - Average is based on month-end balances

We require substantial capital resources and cash to support our business strategy. We use cash to make sub-prime used automobile loans and meet our cash needs for operations.

The Company’s growth strategy requires the Company to increase its acquisitions of installment contracts. We anticipate, however, to acquire installment contracts for the remainder of 2009 at a slower pace than we are capable of due to limited access to credit resulting from the current economic situation. We expect to pay between 92% and 94% of the outstanding principal balance for installment contracts that are purchased. We expect to fund these acquisitions from a combination of internally generated cash flow and our line of credit. Our $15 million line of credit had an outstanding balance of over $12 million as of June 30, 2009.

The Company ~~has~~maintains ~~received~~an ~~notice~~allowance ~~from~~for ~~its~~credit ~~lender~~losses ~~that~~at ~~the~~an ~~lender~~amount isit nobelieves ~~longer~~is ~~extending~~adequate ~~credit~~ to ~~finance~~absorb ~~companies~~reasonably ~~and~~estimable ~~thus~~probable ~~our~~losses ~~line~~in ofits ~~credit~~portfolio ~~will not be~~of ~~renewed~~installment orcontracts. The ~~extended~~Company’s ~~when~~management itevaluates ~~matures in January, 2010. If~~ the ~~current~~ ~~economic~~adequacy ~~conditions~~of ~~and~~the ~~tight~~allowance for credit ~~markets~~losses ~~continue,~~on wea ~~may~~regular ~~be unable to~~basis. In ~~refinance~~performing ~~our~~these ~~bank~~periodic ~~line of credit when it matures~~evaluations, ~~and~~management iffollows wean appropriately-documented ~~are~~methodology. This ~~unable~~methodology torequires ~~refinance~~management ~~our~~to ~~line~~evaluate ~~of credit we will be considered in default and~~ the ~~entire outstanding~~adequacy ~~balance~~ of the ~~credit~~allowance ~~facility~~for ~~will~~credit ~~become~~losses ~~immediately~~based ~~due and~~on ~~payable. To~~a ~~cure~~review ~~the default the lender could assume ownership~~ of ~~all of~~various ~~our~~quantitative ~~assets~~ and ~~liquidate~~qualitative ~~the~~analyses ~~assets~~as described in aItem ~~manner~~2, ~~the~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~lender~~DISCUSSION ~~deems satisfactory~~AND inANALYSIS, ~~order~~under tothe ~~satisfy~~heading ~~the~~Critical Accounting ~~line~~Policies, ofJudgments ~~credit~~and ~~balance~~Estimates. WeThe ~~can~~Company ~~give~~incurs noa ~~assurance that we~~charge ~~will~~against beits ~~able~~earnings, toas ~~secure~~a ~~additional~~provision ~~financing~~for ~~with~~credit ~~terms~~losses, ~~acceptable~~based toon ~~us.~~this ~~If we~~analysis ~~are~~as ~~unable~~described toin ~~secure~~Item ~~additional financing~~2, weMANAGEMENT’S ~~may~~DISCUSSION beAND ~~forced to~~ANALYSIS, ~~liquidate. Management~~under ~~and~~ the ~~Company’s~~heading ~~investment banking firm are~~Results ~~currently seeking alternative sources~~ of ~~debt~~Operations ~~and~~– ~~equity~~Provision ~~financing~~for Credit Losses.

~~The~~Our ~~Company~~allowance ~~began~~for ~~2009~~credit ~~with~~losses was $2763,~~145~~541 at September 30,~~436~~ ~~cash~~2009 oncompared ~~hand~~to $639,799 ~~and~~at ~~had~~December ~~cash~~31, on2008. As ~~hand~~a percentage of our outstanding net $2Installment Contracts,~~209,161~~ atour ~~June~~allowance for credit losses was 4.09% at September 30, 2009 and 3. ~~Operating~~86% ~~activities~~at ~~provided~~December ~~cash~~31, of2008. The allowance for credit losses was ~~$620,338~~13.82% ~~during~~and ~~the~~18.42% ~~six~~of ~~month~~past ~~period~~due ~~ended~~accounts ~~June~~and 88.10% and 107.92% of accounts considered delinquent as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively.

WeDuring ~~invested~~the ~~cash~~nine ofmonths ~~approximately~~ended $5September 30,~~888~~ 2009,~~000~~ toour ~~acquire~~net ~~installment~~Installment ~~contracts~~Contracts ~~during~~increased $2,080,110. This increase was the ~~six~~result ~~month~~of ~~period~~a ~~ended~~$2,310,393 increase ~~June~~in 30automobile-secured contracts offset by a $230,283 ~~2009~~decrease in all other Installment Contracts. WeThe ~~collected principal~~$2,310,393 ~~payments~~increase onin automobile-secured ~~our~~Installment ~~installment~~Contracts ~~contracts~~was comprised of ~~approximately~~a $2,~~974~~556,~~000~~884 increase ~~during~~in ~~the~~Installment ~~six~~Contracts ~~month~~acquired ~~period~~through ~~ended~~our ~~June~~U.S. 30point-of-sale program offset by a $236,964 ~~2009~~decrease in Installment Contracts acquired through our Canadian point-of-sale program, and a $9,527 decrease in Installment Contracts acquired through bulk purchases.

~~During~~The ~~the~~Company’s ~~three~~loss ~~months~~history ~~and~~in ~~six~~its ~~months~~U.S. ~~ended~~portfolio ~~June~~of ~~30,~~installment ~~2009~~contracts ~~the~~and ~~Company~~in ~~received net~~its ~~advances~~Canadian onportfolio ~~its~~of ~~bank~~automobile-secured ~~line~~installment ofcontracts ~~credit~~is limited. Due ~~totaling~~to ~~$1,250,000~~this ~~and~~limited $2operating history,~~050,000,~~ using historical loss ~~respectively,~~ratios to ~~partially~~predict ~~fund~~future ~~the~~probable ~~acquisition~~losses is of ~~Installment~~limited ~~Contracts~~usefulness. ~~Total~~Additionally, ~~advances~~uncertainty ~~outstanding~~exists ~~under~~with ~~the~~respect ~~line~~to the accuracy of ~~credit agreement~~our asestimates of ~~June~~amounts ~~30,~~we ~~2009~~will ~~totaled~~recover ~~approximately~~through ~~$12,042,000. Our~~the sale of ~~ability~~repossessed tocollateral ~~continue~~and with respect to ~~draw~~anticipated ~~funds~~future ~~under~~economic conditions, both in the ~~line~~U.S. ofand ~~credit~~Canada, ~~depends~~and ontheir ~~our ability~~effect toon ~~maintain~~the aperformance ~~sufficient~~of our ~~borrowing~~portfolio ~~base~~of byinstallment ~~submitting loan documents~~contracts. ~~purchased~~For tothese reasons, our ~~lender~~historical ~~that~~loss ratios ~~are~~may ~~considered~~not ~~eligible~~be ~~assets~~relied byupon ~~our lender,~~as ~~and~~predictions ~~our~~of ~~continued~~the ~~compliance~~future ~~with~~performance ~~the~~of ~~covenants~~our portfolio inor our ~~line~~future ofloss ~~credit agreement~~experience.

~~We paid~~During ~~financing~~the ~~fees~~nine ~~totaling~~months ~~$472,347~~ended ~~during~~September ~~2008~~30, in2009, ~~connection~~we ~~with~~experienced ~~fund~~net ~~raising~~charge-offs of ~~activities~~$888,841, ~~performed~~which byrepresented ~~our~~6.39% ~~investment~~of ~~banking~~our ~~firms~~average ~~and~~outstanding ~~fees~~installment contracts ~~paid~~during tothe ~~our lender~~period. During ~~These~~the ~~financing~~year ~~fees~~ended ~~have~~December ~~been~~31, ~~deferred~~2008, we ~~and~~experienced ~~are~~net ~~being~~charge-offs ~~amortized~~of ~~to interest~~$751,578, ~~expense~~which ~~over~~represented ~~the~~5.96% ~~term~~ of ~~the~~our average ~~line~~outstanding ofinstallment ~~credit. The~~contracts ~~fees amortized~~ during the ~~six month period ended June 30, 2009 amounted to $144,504~~year.

The ~~Company’s~~allowance ~~current~~for ~~agreement~~credit ~~with~~losses ~~its~~as ~~investment~~of ~~banking~~September ~~firm~~30, ~~requires~~2009 ~~the Company~~of to$763,541 ~~pay~~is ~~total~~4.09% ~~aggregate~~of ~~transaction~~our outstanding ~~fees~~net ofinstallment ~~not~~contracts. ~~less~~Based ~~than~~on ~~$550,000~~the toanalyses ~~the~~we performed ~~investment~~related ~~banking~~to ~~firm~~our ~~should~~allowance ~~the~~for ~~Company~~credit ~~consummate~~losses aas ~~transaction~~described ~~with~~above ~~a lender~~and oras ~~other~~described in ~~party~~Item ~~that~~2, ~~the~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION ~~investment~~AND ~~banking~~ANALYSIS, ~~firm~~under ~~introduces~~the toheading ~~the~~Critical ~~Company. As~~Accounting ofPolicies ~~June~~and 30Judgments, ~~2009,~~we ~~the~~believe ~~Company~~that ~~had~~our ~~paid~~allowance ~~fees~~for credit ~~amounting~~losses is adequate to cover probable losses that can be reasonably ~~$35,000~~estimated toas ~~the~~of ~~investment~~September ~~banking~~30, ~~firm~~2009.

~~Our line~~The offollowing ~~credit~~tables ~~agreement~~set ~~contains~~forth ~~covenants, among others, that 1) require~~ the ~~Company~~ toactivity ~~maintain~~in ~~a minimum net worth of $7,500,000 as of~~ the ~~end~~allowance offor ~~each fiscal~~credit ~~quarter,~~losses ~~2) restrict~~ for the ~~Company’s~~three ~~ability~~months ~~to declare or pay dividends,~~ and 3)nine ~~limit~~months ~~the~~ended ~~amount~~September ~~of capital expenditures the Company can incur in any fiscal year. The Company was not in violation of any financial covenants as of June~~ 30, 2009~~. If~~ ~~the~~and ~~Company experiences additional net losses totaling $1 million~~2008, ~~it would be at risk of defaulting under the~~ ~~minimum net worth covenant.~~respectively:

The Company spent approximately $35,000 upgrading its underwriting and loan servicing systems during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The Company had no additional material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2009. We believe these investments will serve to strengthen our internal controls, allow us to quicken our response time to our customers, provide management with improved reporting tools and fulfill our software needs for the foreseeable future.

As the Company continues to grow, we may need to recruit and hire additional sales, operating and administrative personnel. We expect to be able to fund the costs of these activities from operating cash flows.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2009									2008
	United States			Canada			Total			United States			Canada			Total

Balance at beginning of period	$	682,051		$	80,320		$	762,371		$	569,794		$	106,146		$	675,940

Charge-offs		(532,243	)		(14,383	)		(546,626	)		(330,190	)		(54,409	)		(384,599	)
Recoveries		213,804			4,008			217,812			162,787			3,308			166,095

Net charge-offs		(318,439	)		(10,375	)		(328,814	)		(167,403	)		(51,101	)		(218,504	)

Provision for credit losses		323,214			-			323,214			167,403			29,301			196,704

Effect of foreign currency translation		-			6,770			6,770			-			(4,281	)		(4,281	)

Balance at end of period	$	686,826		$	76,715		$	763,541		$	569,794		$	80,065		$	649,859

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009									2008
	United States			Canada			Total			United States			Canada			Total

Balance at beginning of period	$	569,794		$	70,005		$	639,799		$	670,222		$	141,154		$	811,376

Charge-offs		(1,549,278	)		(63,797	)		(1,613,075	)		(1,053,030	)		(132,607	)		(1,185,637	)
Recoveries		701,817			22,417			724,234			663,341			33,625			696,966

Net charge-offs		(847,461	)		(41,380	)		(888,841	)		(389,689	)		(98,982	)		(488,671	)

Provision for credit losses		964,493			38,326			1,002,819			289,261			47,857			337,118

Effect of foreign currency translation		-			9,764			9,764			-			(9,964	)		(9,964	)

Balance at end of period	$	686,826		$	76,715		$	763,541		$	569,794		$	80,065		$	649,859

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company received notice in June 2009 from its lender that the lender is no longer extending credit to finance companies and thus our line of credit will not be renewed or extended when it matures in January, 2010. As a result of the current economic conditions and tight credit markets, we have been unable to refinance our bank line of credit. If an outstanding balance remains on the credit facility on the maturity date, we will be considered in default and the entire outstanding balance of the credit facility will become immediately due and payable. To cure the default the lender could assume ownership of all of our assets and liquidate the assets in a manner the lender deems satisfactory in order to satisfy the line of credit balance. To date, we have not been able to secure additional financing with terms acceptable to us.

On October 19, 2009, we entered into an Auto Receivables Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which we will, subject to certain terms and conditions, including approval by the stockholders at a Special Meeting of stockholders to be held November 30, 2009, sell substantially all of our retail installment contracts to the third party. As consideration for this sale, we will receive an amount for such retail installment contracts calculated by a formula applying certain percentages to the outstanding principal amount of receivables of differing credit categories. Based on the balance of the various categories estimated as of the projected sale date, the estimated purchase price would be approximately $15.0 million. The amount will vary due to principal payments and the credit quality of the portfolio at the time of the sale.

In anticipation of the Company entering into an agreement to sell its portfolio of retail installment contracts, on September 23, 2009, the Company suspended purchasing retail installment contracts and dismissed its entire marketing and underwriting staff.

On October 9, 2009, we entered into an amendment to our loan agreement with our Lender. Under this amendment, all funds coming into the lockbox account, after payment of interest and the fees provided under the loan agreement will be applied by the Lender to reduce the principal balance of the ReMark loan and will not be remitted to us as was the practice under the loan agreement before the amendment. In addition, the Lender will not provide further advances under loan in excess of the $12,042,000 current balance. We believe that we have sufficient cash available for operations until the asset sale takes place.

The Company began 2009 with $2,145,436 cash on hand and had cash on hand of $2,192,134 at September 30, 2009. Operating activities provided cash of $1,023,917 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009.

We invested cash of approximately $7,722,000 to acquire installment contracts during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. We collected principal payments on our installment contracts of approximately $4,457,000 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 the Company received net advances on its bank line of credit totaling $2,050,000, to partially fund the acquisition of Installment Contracts. Total advances outstanding under the line of credit agreement as of September 30, 2009 totaled approximately $12,042,000.

We paid financing fees totaling $472,347 during 2008 in connection with fund raising activities performed by our investment banking firms and fees paid to our lender. These financing fees have been deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the line of credit. The fees amortized during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $216,756.

The Company’s current agreement with its investment banking firm requires the Company to pay total aggregate transaction fees of not less than $550,000 to the investment banking firm should the Company consummate a loan transaction with a lender or other party that the investment banking firm introduces to the Company. If the transaction were to be consummated as a sale of all or a portion of the Company’s receivables, the fee would be 2.5% multiplied by the amount of consideration received by the Company for the sale. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had paid fees amounting to $65,000 to the investment banking firm.

Our line of credit agreement contains covenants, among others, that 1) require the Company to maintain a minimum net worth of $7,500,000 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, 2) restrict the Company’s ability to declare or pay dividends, and 3) limit the amount of capital expenditures the Company can incur in any fiscal year. The Company was not in violation of any financial covenants as of September 30, 2009.

The Company spent approximately $35,000 upgrading its underwriting and loan servicing systems during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The Company had no additional material commitments for capital expenditures as of September 30, 2009. We believe these investments will serve to strengthen our internal controls, allow us to quicken our response time to our customers, provide management with improved reporting tools and fulfill our software needs for the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company, in its ordinary course of business, commits to purchase certain installment contracts from its customers. Each commitment is essentially an “offer” by the Company to purchase a specific installment contract that the Company has pre-approved, and customers generally have up to 20 days to “accept” the offer by selling to the Company the pre-approved installment contract. The Company had outstanding commitments to acquire installment contracts totaling approximately $1328,~~011,386~~400 as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2009. Typically, the Company funds between 20% and 30% of its outstanding commitments.

The Company is also obligated under a noncancelable lease for its principal office with a term of five years. Future minimum payments under this lease as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 are as follows:

2009		2512,~~215~~686
2010		50,740
2011		50,740
2012		50,740
2013		29,599
Total	$	~~207~~194,~~034~~505

~~The~~As of September 30, 2009, the Company had noentered ~~other~~into ~~off-balance~~an ~~sheet~~agreement ~~arrangements~~to assell substantially all of ~~June~~its 30consumer loan portfolio to an unrelated third party. The purchase agreement for the transaction provided for a $150,000 breakage fee if the Company elected to terminate or failed to consummate the sale. On October 19, 2009, the Company entered into a new purchase agreement with a different unrelated third party at a substantially higher sale price and terminated the first purchase agreement and on October 20, 2009, paid the $150,000 breakage fee. The second purchase agreement provides for a $300,000 breakup fee if the Company elects to terminate the agreement.

The Company had no other off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2009.

Recent Developments

The Purchase Agreement provided for a $150,000 breakup fee to FIFS if we terminated the agreement or failed to consummate the Asset Sale.

On October 9, 2009, we entered into an Amendment to our Revolving Loan and Security Agreement our Lender. Since the Purchase Agreement with FIFS provided for the sale of our receivables at less than the price at which we can purchase new receivables from our independent dealer network, we announced on September 23, 2009 that we were suspending the purchase of new auto loan receivables from our network of independent used automobile dealerships.

· We agree that an uncured Event of Default exists and is continuing under the Loan Agreement

· The Lender has agreed to forbear from exercising certain default remedies under the Loan Agreement until November 9, 2009

· The Lender has the right to appoint a Supervisory Servicer to monitor or take over our receivables servicing function at our expense

· All funds coming into the lockbox account, after payment of interest and the fees provided under the Loan Agreement (including those of a Supervisory Servicer if one is appointed), will be applied by the Lender to reduce the principal balance of the ReMark Loan and will not be remitted to us as was the practice under the Loan Agreement before the Amendment. This should result in a more rapid paydown of the ReMark Loan

· The Lender will not provide further advances under the ReMark Loan in excess of the $12,042,000 current balance. We had not planned to request additional advances under the ReMark Loan

· The Lender will accrue Default Rate Interest equal to the existing rate plus 4.5% commencing September 23, 2009. The existing Note Rate of interest will be payable prior to the expiration of the forbearance period, and the difference between the Note Rate and the Default Rate Interest will be payable after expiration of the forbearance period

· The forbearance period will automatically expire on the earlier of (i) November 9, 2009, (ii) any termination of the Asset Sale, (iii) any other Event of Default under the Loan Agreement, or (iv) any default in performance of the Amendment

On October 6, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a Plan of Dissolution and Complete Liquidation of the Company (“Plan of Dissolution”).

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this item.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or ~~are~~ are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 4T. Controls and Procedures

Not applicable.

3135

PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. Exhibits

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number		Description

2.1		Corrected Trustee’s Amended Plan of Reorganization (1)
2.2		Disclosure Statement for Trustee’s Amended Plan of Reorganization (1)
3.1		First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.1.1		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.1.2		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation (2)
3.2		Bylaws (1)
3.2.1		Amendment to Bylaws (1)
3.2.2		Amendment to Bylaws (2)
4.1		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Freedom Financial Group I Statutory Trust (1)

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s registration statement filed on Form 10-SB on May 2, 2005 (File Number 000-51286), and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q on November 6, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

3236

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.	~~FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.~~
Date:	~~August~~November 79, 2009		By:	/s/ Jerald L. Fenstermaker
			Jerald L. Fenstermaker	~~Jerald L. Fenstermaker~~
			President and Chief Executive Officer	~~President and Chief Executive Officer~~
			(Principal Executive Officer)	~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~
Date:	~~August~~November 79, 2009		By:	/s/ J. Kevin Maxwell
			J. Kevin Maxwell	~~J. Kevin Maxwell~~
			Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer	~~Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer~~
			(Principal Financial Officer)	~~(Principal Financial Officer)~~

3337

Filing Compare · FREEDOM FINANCIAL GROUP INC