UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

R Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009

£ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to .

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-12164

WOLVERINE TUBE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	63-0970812
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

200 Clinton Avenue West, Suite 1000
Huntsville, Alabama	35801
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(256) 353-1310

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES £ NO R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer £	Accelerated filer £
Non-accelerated filer £	Smaller reporting company R
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No R

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each class of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Class		Outstanding as of ~~August~~November 1415, 2009
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value		40,623,736 Shares

WOLVERINE TUBE, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~July~~OCTOBER 54, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page No.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

Item 1. Financial Statements	3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures	41

PART II OTHER INFORMATION	41

Item 1A. Risk Factors	41

Item 6. Exhibits	41

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~Item1.~~ Item 1. Financial Statements

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended						~~Six~~Nine months ended
(In thousands except per share amounts)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Net sales	$	~~113~~117,~~580~~962		$	~~245~~231,~~511~~048		$	~~223~~341,~~182~~144		$	~~446~~678,~~970~~018
Cost of goods sold		~~108~~114,~~998~~855			~~237~~222,~~569~~249			~~215~~329,~~025~~880			~~428~~650,~~025~~274
Gross profit		43,~~582~~107			78,~~942~~799			811,~~157~~264			1827,~~945~~744
Selling, general and administrative expenses		65,~~873~~531			65,~~246~~684			1218,~~523~~054			1318,~~181~~865
Net (gain) loss on divestitures		—			~~378~~(21,711	)		—			(526,~~004~~715	)
Advisory fees and expenses		~~(32~~2	)		27239			~~266~~268			~~552~~791
Restructuring and impairment charges		717			1,123			1,509			5,060
Goodwill impairment		—			44,000			—			44,000
Operating income (loss)		(2,976	)		168			(6,141	)		5,156
Restructuring and impairment charges		1,731			345			3,240			5,405
Operating income (loss)		(4,157	)		(19,758	)		(10,298	)		(14,602	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest expense, net		4,~~509~~394			43,~~859~~975			812,~~040~~434			913,~~800~~775
Amortization expense		62			~~574~~866			~~803~~865			12,~~271~~137
Loss on sale of receivables		—			~~103~~167			—			~~207~~374
Embedded derivatives mark to fair value		—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Loss from extinguishment of debt		—			—			3,647			—
Loss from extinguishment of debt		3,647			—			3,647			—
Other, net		(226	)		262			(483	)		22
Other, net		(36	)		(256	)		(257	)		(237	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and income taxes		(8,387	)		(25,028	)		(26,761	)		(30,910	)
Loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and income taxes		(11,158	)		(5,109	)		(18,374	)		(5,882	)
Non-controlling interest		—			(266	)		—			(541	)
Non-controlling interest		—			194			—			275
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		658			138			1,337			138
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		(338	)		—			(679	)		—
Income tax benefit (expense)		527			845			(96	)		(1,043	)
Income tax expense		263			787			623			1,888
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(7,202	)		(24,311	)		(25,520	)		(32,356	)
(Loss) from continuing operations		(11,083	)		(6,090	)		(18,318	)		(8,045	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			403			—			781
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			(5,769	)		—			378
Net income (loss)		(7,202	)		(23,908	)		(25,520	)		(31,575	)
Net (loss)		(11,083	)		(11,859	)		(18,318	)		(7,667	)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,255			1,255			3,766			3,766
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,256			1,255			2,511			2,511
Preferred stock dividends		2,242			1,951			6,526			4,767
Preferred stock dividends		2,176			1,625			4,284			2,816
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(10,699	)	$	(27,114	)	$	(35,812	)	$	(40,108	)
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(14,515	)	$	(14,739	)	$	(25,113	)	$	(12,994	)
Net income(loss) per common share—Basic and Diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.3626	)	$	(0.2268	)	$	(0.6288	)	$	(01.3301	)
Discontinued operations		—			~~(0.14~~—	)		—			—0.01
Net (loss) per common share	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.33	)
Net income (loss) per common share	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.88	)	$	(1.00	)
Shares used in computing income (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted		40,624			40,624			40,624			40,624

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(In thousands except share and per share amounts)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			December 31, 2008
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2423,~~462~~434		$	33,537
Restricted cash		98,~~239~~046			37,738
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $216 in 2009
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $428 in 2009 and $392 in 2008		44,667			38,626
and $392 in 2008		45,647			38,626
Inventories		46,049			53,284
Inventories		49,383			53,284
Assets held for sale		—			3,680
Derivative assets		~~858~~1,006			291
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,~~910~~909			5,380
Total current assets		~~132~~126,~~499~~111			172,536
Property, plant and equipment, net		55,~~386~~383			52,004
Intangible assets and deferred charges, net		2,~~591~~634			2,634
Notes receivable		~~576~~595			585
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary		107,~~053~~909			9,373
Total assets	$	~~201~~192,~~105~~632		$	237,132
Liabilities and Accumulated Deficit
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	31,~~262~~467		$	34,713
Accrued liabilities		106,~~276~~379			13,250
Derivative liabilities		2,~~291~~670			5,415
Deferred income taxes		~~858~~325			1,601
Short-term borrowings		~~1,411~~8			16,112
Total current liabilities		4640,~~098~~849			71,091
Long-term debt		~~122~~124,~~723~~210			121,558
Pension liabilities		4546,~~853~~456			45,552
Postretirement benefits obligation		4,~~444~~385			4,662
Accrued environmental remediation		9,~~477~~393			9,628
Accrued dividends		912,~~760~~003			5,476
Other liabilities		32,~~128~~981			3,290
Total liabilities		~~241~~240,~~483~~277			261,257
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $1,000 per share, 90,000 shares
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, stated value $1,000 per share, 90,000 shares authorized; 54,494 shares issued and outstanding as of October 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008		17,674			13,908
authorized; 54,494 shares issued and outstanding as of July 5, 2009 and
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, stated value $1,000 per share, 25,000 shares authorized; 10,000 shares issued and outstanding as of October 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008		9,700			9,700
December 31, 2008		16,419			13,908
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $1,000 per share, 25,000 shares
authorized; 10,000 shares issued and outstanding as of July 5, 2009 and
December 31, 2008		9,700			9,700
Accumulated deficit
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 180,000,000 shares authorized;
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 180,000,000 shares authorized; 40,623,736 shares issued and outstanding as of October 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008		406			406
40,623,736 shares issued and outstanding as of July 5, 2009 and December 31,
Additional paid-in capital		139,015			142,588
2008		406			406
Accumulated deficit		(183,328	)		(151,281	)
Additional paid-in capital		140,224			142,588
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		(31,112	)		(39,446	)
Accumulated deficit		(173,883	)		(151,281	)
Total accumulated deficit		(75,019	)		(47,733	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		(33,244	)		(39,446	)
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and accumulated deficit	$	192,632		$	237,132
Total accumulated deficit		(66,497	)		(47,733	)
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and accumulated deficit	$	201,105		$	237,132

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six months ended
	Nine months ended
(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Operating Activities
Loss from continuing operations	$	(1825,~~318~~520	)	$	(832,~~045~~356	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			~~378~~781
Net (loss)		(1825,~~318~~520	)		(731,~~667~~575	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation		34,~~189~~784			34,~~239~~809
Amortization		~~879~~992			12,~~468~~255
Deferred income taxes		(~~736~~1,273	)		(~~164~~1,452	)
Gain on sale of fixed assets		(~~273~~316	)		—
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		3,647			(858	)
Non-cash paid-in-kind interest		12,~~165~~652			—
Non-controlling interest in Chinese subsidiary		—			~~275~~541
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		(~~679~~1,337	)		—(138	)
Impairment of assets held for sale		—			391
Impairment of assets and goodwill		250			44,390
Non-cash environmental, restructuring and other charges		~~139~~248			(75,~~275~~129	)
Embedded derivative mark to fair value		—			~~1,282~~(3	)
Stock compensation expense		~~144~~187			1,~~124~~542
Net gain on divestitures		—			(26,715	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(75,~~043~~705	)		(2017,~~663~~755	)
Inventories		3,717			(3,027	)
Sale of accounts receivable		—			3,000
Income taxes		281			277
Inventories		7,312			342
Prepaid expenses and other		1,252			5,020
Income taxes		(441	)		132
Accounts payable		(3,435	)		5,431
Prepaid expenses and other		1,038			3,082
Accrued liabilities, including pension, postretirement benefit, and environmental		(645	)		(8,908	)
Accounts payable		(3,363	)		10,258
Net cash from continuing operating activities		(16,716	)		(30,433	)
Accrued liabilities, including pension, postretirement benefit, and environmental		(1,889	)		(14,102	)
Net cash from discontinued operating activities		(31	)		(10,491	)
Net cash from continuing operating activities		(18,734	)		(28,157	)
Net cash from operating activities		(16,747	)		(40,924	)
Net cash from discontinued operating activities		(32	)		(10,090	)
Net cash from operating activities		(18,766	)		(38,247	)
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(24,~~854~~355	)		(23,~~737~~124	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		~~273~~316			56,~~416~~440
Purchase of patents		(~~103~~159	)		—
Proceeds from sale of interest in Chinese subsidiary		—			919,~~500~~419
Change in restricted cash		2829,~~499~~692			(48,~~831~~075	)
Net cash from continuing investing activities		25,~~815~~494			714,~~348~~660
Net cash from discontinued investing activities		1,200			2262,~~201~~163
Net cash from investing activities		2726,~~015~~694			2976,~~549~~823
Financing Activities
Financing fees and expenses paid		(4,~~391~~384	)		(12,~~713~~071	)
Payments under revolving credit facilities and other debt		(791,490	)		(~~676~~366	)
Borrowings from revolving credit facilities and other debt		1,399			~~158~~127
Issuance of preferred stock		—			14,194
Purchase or repayment of senior notes		(16,142	)		(3697,~~347~~661	)
Dividend received from unconsolidated subsidiary		2,802			—
Payment of dividends		—			(2,042	)
Net cash from financing activities		(1917,~~213~~815	)		(2687,~~426~~819	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents		(~~130~~216	)		~~861~~(1,249	)
Net increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(910,~~075~~103	)		(3650,~~940~~492	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		33,537			63,303
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2423,~~462~~434		$	2612,~~363~~811
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow:
Interest paid	$	813,~~326~~518		$	1113,~~149~~418
Income taxes paid, net	$	~~644~~1,749		$	~~931~~1,571

See accompanying notes to the ~~condened~~condensed consolidated financial statements.

. Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Basis of Reporting for Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wolverine Tube, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to as “Wolverine”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”, unless the context otherwise requires. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have prepared the audited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements presented herewith reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and cash flows for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008. The results for ~~these~~ these periods reflect certain operations as discontinued as a result of certain facilities divestitures (see Note 5, Discontinued Operations). Our internal operational reporting cycle (i.e. Sunday closest to quarter end) is used for quarterly financial reporting. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for an entire year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

The Company’s financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which assumes that the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the ordinary course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company believes that its available cash and cash anticipated to be generated through operations is expected to be adequate to fund the Company’s liquidity requirements, although there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to generate such cash. Additionally, the Company does not currently have in effect a revolving credit agreement or other capital commitments to supplement its existing cash and anticipated cash resources, if necessary, to meet its liquidity requirements materially in excess of the Company’s current expectations. The uncertainty about the Company’s ability to achieve its projected results, the absence of such credit or capital commitments and the uncertainty about the future price of copper, which has a substantial impact on working capital, raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company expects to continue to actively manage and optimize its cash balances and liquidity, working capital, operating expenses and product profitability, although there can be no assurances the Company will be able to do so.

The December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet includes reclassifications from amounts previously presented on ~~forms~~Forms 10-K and 10-K(/A). The reclassifications relate to classifications of accrued dividends from current to long-term and of certain amounts from short-term to long-term debt. Such reclassifications contained herein had no impact, for any period, on previously reported, as amended, net income (loss) or accumulated deficit.

Adoption of New Accounting Policies

As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, the Company’s significant accounting policies, which are ~~described~~ described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, have not materially changed from December 31, 2008, except for the following:

On ~~January~~ July 1, 2009, the ~~Company~~Financial ~~adopted~~Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the ~~provisions~~source of ~~SFAS~~authoritative, ~~No.~~nongovernmental ~~161~~generally accepted accounting principles (~~SFAS 161~~“GAAP”), ~~Disclosures~~except ~~about Derivative~~for ~~Instruments~~rules and ~~Hedging~~interpretive releases ~~Activities~~of -the anSecurities ~~amendment~~and ofExchange ~~FASB~~Commission ~~Statement No.~~(“SEC”), ~~133~~which ~~issued~~are bysources ~~the~~of authoritative ~~FASB~~GAAP infor ~~March~~SEC ~~2008~~registrants. ~~This~~All ~~statement~~other ~~requires~~non-grandfathered, non-SEC ~~enhanced~~accounting ~~disclosures~~literature ~~about~~not anincluded ~~entity's~~in ~~derivative~~the ~~and~~ASC ~~hedging~~will ~~activities~~become ~~and~~non-authoritative. The ~~thereby~~new ~~improves~~ASC ~~the~~is ~~transparency~~effective offor financial ~~reporting.~~statements ~~Entities~~for ~~are~~interim ~~required to~~or ~~provide~~annual ~~enhanced~~reporting periods ~~disclosures~~ending ~~about~~after ~~(a)~~September ~~how~~15, ~~and~~2009. The ~~why~~Company anhas ~~entity~~begun ~~uses~~to ~~derivative~~use ~~instruments,~~the ~~(b)~~new ~~how~~guidelines ~~derivative instruments~~ and ~~related~~numbering ~~hedged~~system ~~items~~prescribed ~~are accounted~~by ~~for~~the ~~under~~ASC ~~SFAS~~when ~~133~~referring ~~and~~to GAAP ~~its~~in ~~related~~this ~~interpretations,~~3rd ~~and (c) how~~quarter ~~derivative~~2009 ~~instruments~~interim report and ~~related~~it ~~hedged~~will ~~items~~do ~~affect~~so anin ~~entity's~~its ~~financial~~fiscal 2009 annual ~~position,~~report. As ~~financial~~the ~~performance,~~ASC ~~and~~was ~~cash~~not ~~flows.~~intended ~~The~~to ~~adoption~~change ofor ~~SFAS~~alter ~~161~~existing ~~did~~GAAP, it will not have aany ~~material~~ impact on the Company’s ~~Condensed~~consolidated ~~Consolidated~~financial ~~Financial~~results or ~~Statements~~financial position.

In ~~April~~March 2008, the FASB ~~issued~~announced ~~FASB~~it ~~Staff~~would ~~Position~~require ~~(FSP)~~enhanced ~~FAS~~disclosures ~~142-3~~about ~~(FSP~~an ~~FAS~~entity's derivative ~~142-3)~~and hedging activities, ~~Determination~~thereby ofimproving the ~~Useful~~transparency ~~Life~~ of ~~Intangible~~financial ~~Assets~~reporting. ~~FSP~~Entities ~~FAS~~are ~~142-3~~required ~~amends~~to ~~the~~provide ~~factors~~enhanced ~~that~~disclosures ~~should be~~about ~~considered~~(a) inhow ~~developing~~and ~~renewal~~why oran ~~extension~~entity ~~assumptions~~uses ~~used~~derivative toinstruments, ~~determine~~(b) ~~the~~how derivative ~~useful~~instruments ~~life~~and ofrelated ahedged ~~recognized~~items ~~intangible~~are ~~asset~~accounted for under ~~SFAS 142.~~ASC ~~FSP~~815, ~~FAS~~Derivatives ~~142-3~~and Hedging, and is(c) ~~effective~~how ~~for~~derivative ~~fiscal~~instruments ~~years~~and ~~beginning~~related ~~after~~hedged ~~December 15,~~items ~~2008.~~affect ~~The~~an entity's ~~Company~~financial ~~has~~position, ~~evaluated~~financial ~~the~~performance, ~~impact~~and ofcash ~~adopting~~flows ~~FSP~~per the guidance ~~FAS~~found ~~142-3~~in ~~and~~ASC ~~has~~815. ~~found~~On itJanuary ~~does~~1, 2009, the Company adopted these new provisions which did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In ~~June~~April 2008, the FASB’s ~~Emerging~~amended ~~Issues~~the ~~Task~~factors ~~Force~~that ~~(EITF)~~should ~~reached~~be aconsidered ~~consensus~~in ~~on EITF~~developing ~~Issue~~renewal ~~No. 07-5 (EITF 07-5), Determining Whether an Instrument (~~or ~~Embedded~~extension ~~Feature)~~assumptions Isused ~~Indexed~~ to andetermine ~~Entity’s~~the ~~Own~~useful ~~Stock.~~life ~~This~~of ~~EITF~~a ~~Issue~~recognized ~~provides~~intangible ~~guidance~~asset onunder ~~the~~ASC ~~determination~~350, of“Intangibles ~~whether~~– ~~such~~Goodwill ~~instruments are~~and ~~classified~~Other”. inThe ~~equity~~Company orhas asevaluated athe ~~derivative~~impact ~~instrument~~of ~~and~~adopting this guidance, which is effective for ~~the~~ fiscal ~~year~~years beginning onafter ~~January~~December 15, 12008, ~~2009. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting EITF 07-5~~ and has found it does not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In ~~November~~ June 2008, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force ~~reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 08-6~~ (“EITF ~~08-6~~”), ~~Equity~~reached ~~Method~~a ~~Investment~~consensus Accounting Considerations. EITF 08-6 continues to follow the accounting for the initial carrying value of equity method investments in APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, which is based on ~~a cost~~ ~~accumulation~~determining ~~model~~whether ~~and~~an ~~generally~~instrument ~~excludes~~(or ~~contingent~~embedded ~~consideration.~~feature) ~~EITF 08-6 also specifies that other-than-temporary impairment testing by the investor should be performed at the investment level and that a separate impairment assessment of the underlying assets~~ is ~~not~~indexed ~~required. An~~to ~~impairment charge by the investee should result in~~ an ~~adjustment of the investor’s basis of~~ ~~the impaired asset for the investor~~entity’s ~~pro-rata~~own ~~share~~stock ofand ~~such~~provided ~~impairment.~~guidance ~~In addition, EITF 08-6 reached a consensus~~ on ~~how to account for an issuance of shares by an investee that reduces~~ the ~~investor’s~~determination ~~ownership share~~ of ~~the~~whether such ~~investee.~~instruments Anare ~~investor~~classified ~~should~~in ~~account~~equity ~~for~~or ~~such transactions~~ as ifa itderivative ~~had~~instrument ~~sold~~under aASC ~~proportionate~~815, ~~share~~“Derivatives ~~of its investment with any gains or losses recorded through~~and ~~earnings~~Hedging”. The ~~EITF~~Company ~~08-6~~has ~~also~~evaluated ~~addresses~~ the ~~accounting~~impact ~~for a change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method after adoption~~ of ~~SFAS No. 160. EITF~~adopting ~~08-6~~this ~~affirms the existing~~ guidance ~~in APB 18~~, which ~~requires~~is ~~cessation~~effective ~~of the equity method of accounting and application of FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting~~ for ~~Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, or~~ the ~~cost~~fiscal ~~method~~year ~~under~~beginning ~~APB 18, as appropriate. EITF 08-6 is effective for transactions occurring~~ on ~~or after~~January ~~December 15~~1, ~~2008. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting EITF~~ ~~08-6~~2009, and has found it does not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In ~~December~~ November 2008, the FASB’s ~~issued~~EITF clarified ~~FASB~~the ~~Staff~~accounting ~~Position~~for ~~(FSP)~~certain ~~FAS~~transactions ~~132(R)-1~~and ~~(FSP~~impairment ~~FAS~~considerations ~~132(R)-1),~~involving ~~Employers’ Disclosures~~equity ~~about~~method ~~Postretirement~~investments. ~~Benefit~~The ~~Plan~~guidance ~~Assets.~~as ~~FSP~~noted ~~FAS~~in ~~132(R)-1 provides~~ASC ~~guidance~~323, on“Investments”, anstates ~~employer’s~~that ~~disclosures~~the accounting ~~about~~for ~~plan~~the ~~assets~~initial carrying value of aequity ~~defined~~method investments is to be ~~benefit~~based ~~pension~~on ora ~~other~~cost ~~postretirement~~accumulation ~~plan.~~model ~~FSP~~and ~~FAS~~generally ~~132(R)~~excludes contingent consideration. Also, other-1than-temporary ~~also~~impairment ~~includes~~testing by the investor should be performed at the investment level and a separate impairment assessment ~~technical~~of ~~amendment~~the tounderlying ~~FASB~~assets ~~Statement~~is Nonot required. ~~132(R),~~An ~~effective~~impairment ~~immediately,~~charge ~~which~~by the investee ~~requires~~should ~~nonpublic~~result ~~entities~~in toan ~~disclose~~adjustment ~~net~~of ~~periodic~~the ~~benefit~~investor’s ~~cost~~basis ~~for~~of ~~each annual~~the ~~period~~impaired asset for the ~~which~~investor’s apro-rata ~~statement~~share of ~~income~~such ~~is presented~~impairment. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~addition, ~~has~~the EITF reached ~~disclosed~~a ~~net~~consensus ~~periodic~~on ~~benefit~~how ~~cost~~to inaccount ~~Note~~for ~~10.~~an ~~The~~issuance ~~disclosures~~of ~~about~~shares ~~plan~~by an investee that ~~assets~~reduces ~~required~~the byinvestor’s ~~FSP~~ownership ~~FAS~~share ~~132(R)-1~~of ~~must~~the beinvestee. ~~provided~~An investor should account for ~~fiscal~~such ~~years~~transactions ~~ending~~as if it had sold a proportionate share of its ~~after~~investment ~~December 15,~~with ~~2009~~any gains or losses recorded through earnings. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting these considerations, which are effective for ~~FSP~~transactions ~~FAS~~occurring ~~132(R)-1~~on or after December 15, 2008, and has found it does not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In ~~April~~ ~~2009~~December 2008, the FASB ~~issued~~provided ~~FASB~~guidance, ~~Staff~~as ~~Position~~noted ~~(FSP)~~in ~~FAS~~ASC ~~107-1~~715, ~~and~~“Expenses”, ~~APB~~on ~~28-1~~an ~~(FSP FAS~~employer’s ~~107-1),~~disclosures ~~Interim Disclosures~~ about ~~Fair~~plan ~~Value~~assets of ~~Financial~~a ~~Instruments. FSP~~defined ~~FAS~~benefit ~~107-1 amended~~pension ~~Statement~~or ~~of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of~~other ~~Financial~~postretirement ~~Instruments, and APB Opinion No~~plan. ~~28,~~The ~~Interim Financial Reporting, to require~~ disclosures about ~~the~~plan ~~fair~~assets ~~value~~must ofbe ~~financial~~provided ~~instruments in~~for ~~interim~~fiscal asyears ~~well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 is effective for periods~~ ending after ~~June~~ December 15, 2009. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting ~~FASP~~this ~~FAS~~guidance ~~107-1~~ and has found it does not have a ~~material~~ material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

OnIn ~~July~~April 5, 2009, the ~~Company adopted~~ FASB ~~Statement~~began ~~No.~~requiring ~~165,~~disclosures ~~Subsequent~~about ~~Events~~the ~~(SFAS~~fair ~~165). The~~value ~~statement establishes general standards~~ of ~~accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before~~ financial ~~statements~~ ~~are~~instruments ~~issued~~per orASC ~~are~~825, ~~available~~“Financial ~~to be issued. Specifically~~Instrument”, ~~the Statement~~in ~~defines:~~interim ~~(1)~~as ~~the~~well ~~period~~as ~~after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure~~ in ~~the~~annual financial statements,. This ~~(2) the~~requirement ~~circumstances~~is ~~under~~effective ~~which~~for anperiods ~~entity~~ending ~~should~~after ~~recognize~~June ~~events~~15, or2009. The ~~transactions~~Company has ~~occurring~~evaluated ~~after~~ the ~~balance~~impact ~~sheet~~of ~~date~~adopting inthis ~~its~~requirement ~~financial statements,~~ and ~~(3)~~has ~~the disclosures~~found ~~that~~it andoes ~~entity~~not ~~should make about events or transactions that~~have ~~occurred~~a ~~after~~material ~~the~~impact ~~balance~~on ~~sheet~~our ~~date. Management~~results ~~has~~of ~~reviewed events occurring through August 18~~operations, ~~2009, the date the~~ financial ~~statements~~position ~~were issued and no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual~~ or ~~disclosure~~cash flows.

InOn ~~June~~July 5, 2009, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ~~SFAS No. 168, The “~~FASB’s ~~Accounting~~new ~~Standards Codification”~~general ~~and~~standards ~~the Hierarchy~~ of ~~Generally~~accounting ~~Accepted~~for ~~Accounting Principles~~and ~~(“GAAP”). This~~disclosing ~~standard~~events ~~replaces~~that ~~SFAS~~occur ~~No.~~after ~~162,~~the ~~The~~balance ~~Hierarchy~~sheet ofdate ~~Generally~~but ~~Accepted~~before financial ~~Accounting~~statements ~~Principles,~~are ~~and~~issued ~~will~~or ~~become~~are ~~the~~available ~~source~~to ofbe ~~authoritative~~issued. Specifically, ~~nongovernmental~~ASC ~~GAAP~~855, ~~except~~“Subsequent Events”, ~~for~~defines: ~~rules~~(1) ~~and~~the ~~interpretive~~period ~~releases~~after of the ~~Securities~~ ~~and~~balance ~~Exchange~~sheet ~~Commission~~date ~~(“SEC”),~~ during which ~~are~~management ~~sources~~ of ~~authoritative GAAP~~a ~~for~~reporting ~~SEC~~entity ~~registrants.~~should ~~All~~evaluate ~~other~~events ~~nongrandfathered,~~or ~~non-SEC accounting~~transactions ~~literature~~that ~~not~~may ~~included~~occur infor ~~the~~potential ~~Codification~~recognition ~~will~~or ~~become~~disclosure ~~nonauthoritative.~~in ~~This~~the financial ~~standard~~statements, is(2) ~~effective~~the ~~for~~circumstances ~~financial~~under ~~statements~~which ~~for~~an ~~interim~~entity orshould ~~annual~~recognize ~~reporting~~events ~~periods~~or ~~ending~~transactions occurring after ~~September~~the ~~15,~~balance ~~2009. The~~sheet ~~Company~~date ~~will~~in ~~begin~~its tofinancial ~~use~~statements, and (3) the ~~new~~disclosures ~~guidelines~~that ~~and~~an ~~numbering~~entity ~~system~~should ~~prescribed~~make byabout events or transactions that occurred after the ~~Codification~~balance ~~when~~sheet date. Management ~~referring~~has toreviewed ~~GAAP~~events inoccurring ~~its~~through ~~fiscal~~November 17, 2009, ~~annual~~the ~~report. As~~date the financial ~~Codification~~statements ~~was~~were ~~not~~issued ~~intended~~and tono ~~change~~subsequent orevents ~~alter~~occurred ~~existing~~requiring ~~GAAP,~~accrual ~~it will not have~~or ~~any~~disclosure ~~impact~~other onthan the ~~Company’s~~anti-dumping ~~consolidated~~duty ~~financial~~investigation ~~results~~discussed orin ~~financial~~Note 11, ~~position~~Commitments and Contingencies.

(2) Recapitalization Plan

On February 1, 2007, we announced a recapitalization plan which provided significant equity proceeds to Wolverine. We completed the first phase of this recapitalization plan, a private placement of 50,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, for $50.0 million, purchased by The Alpine Group, Inc. (“Alpine”) and a fund managed by Plainfield Asset Management LLC (“Plainfield”) on February 16, 2007, pursuant to a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to our recapitalization plan, in August 2007, we commenced a common stock rights offering which closed on October 29, 2007. Our stockholders purchased 25,444,592 shares of common stock in the rights offering, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $28.0 million. Additionally, under the terms of the call option described in the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, Alpine purchased an additional 4,494 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on January 25, 2008 for $4.5 million in order to maintain the fully diluted ownership by Alpine and Plainfield in Wolverine at 55.0%.

~~We also pursued a financial restructuring plan with respect to our 10.5% and~~ 7.375% Senior Notes, our secured revolving credit facility and our receivables sale facility. In light of market conditions which negatively affected our ability to execute such a comprehensive refinancing strategy, during 2008, we took certain actions to be in a position to retire the 7.375% Senior Notes on their maturity date of August 1, 2008. We extended the maturity of our secured revolving credit facility and our receivables sale facility to February 19, 2009. In February 2008, we sold substantially all of the assets of our STP business for net proceeds of $22.1 million plus a working capital payment to us of approximately $2.8 million. In March 2008 we sold 30.0% of our Wolverine Tube Shanghai Co., Ltd (“WTS”) subsidiary for $9.5 million. On March 20, 2008, Plainfield refinanced $38.3 million of the 7.375% Senior Notes held by it by exchanging them for 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes due March 28, 2009 and Alpine purchased 10,000 shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for $10.0 million, under terms substantially similar to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. On April 21, 2008 we sold our Booneville, Mississippi facility which was closed in January 2008, for $1.4 million. In July 2008, we sold our London, Ontario wholesale and commercial tube business for net proceeds of approximately $41.2 million. These actions provided the liquidity required to repurchase or repay the outstanding 7.375% Senior Notes on or before their maturity in August 2008. On February 29, 2008, we repurchased $12.0 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes at a discount below the face value of the notes, and on April 8, 2008 we repurchased an additional $25.0 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes, also at a discount below the face value of the notes, leaving $61.4 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes, which we paid at maturity on August 1, 2008. On September 15, 2008 we sold an additional 20% of our WTS subsidiary, raising $10.1 million.

OnWe also ~~February~~pursued ~~26, 2009,~~a wefinancial ~~announced~~restructuring ~~the~~plan ~~commencement~~with ofrespect anto ~~offer~~our ~~(the~~10.5% and 7.375% ~~“Exchange~~Senior ~~Offer”)~~Notes, toour ~~each~~secured ofrevolving ~~the~~credit ~~holders~~facility ofand our 10receivables sale facility.5% ~~Senior~~In ~~Exchange~~light ~~Notes~~of ~~and~~ market conditions which negatively affected our 10ability to execute such a comprehensive refinancing strategy, during 2008, we took certain actions to be in a position to retire the 7.5375% Senior Notes ~~due~~on ~~March~~their 28maturity date of August 1, ~~2009~~2008. We extended the maturity of our secured revolving credit facility and ~~April~~our 1receivables sale facility to February 19, 2009,. In February ~~respectively~~2008, towe sold substantially all of the assets of our Small Tube ~~exchange~~Products ~~these~~(“STP”) ~~notes~~business for ~~new~~net ~~notes~~proceeds inof ~~order~~$22.1 million plus a working capital payment to ~~refinance~~us ~~those~~of ~~maturities~~approximately $2.8 ~~The Exchange~~million. ~~Offer~~In ~~was~~March ~~successfully~~2008 ~~consummated~~we onsold ~~April~~30.0% of 28our Wolverine Tube Shanghai Co., ~~2009~~Ltd (“WTS”) subsidiary for $9. 5 million. On March 20, 2008, Plainfield refinanced $8338.3 million of the 107.5375% Senior Notes held ~~and~~by ~~$38.3~~it ~~million~~by ofexchanging ~~the~~them for 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes ~~were~~due ~~exchanged~~March 28, 2009 and Alpine purchased 10,000 shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for ~~new~~$10.0 ~~15%~~million, ~~Senior~~under ~~Secured~~terms ~~Notes~~substantially (similar to the ~~”Senior~~Series ~~Secured~~A Convertible ~~Notes”)~~Preferred Stock. ~~The~~On ~~Senior~~April ~~Secured~~21, ~~Notes~~2008 ~~mature~~we insold aour ~~lump~~Booneville, ~~sum~~Mississippi onfacility which ~~March~~was 31closed in January 2008, ~~2012~~for $1.4 ~~The~~million. In July 2008, we ~~remaining~~sold our London, Ontario wholesale and commercial tube business for net proceeds of approximately $1641.12 million. These ofactions 10provided the liquidity required to repurchase or repay the outstanding 7.5375% Senior Notes ~~were repaid~~ on ~~April~~or ~~28,~~before ~~2009~~their maturity in August 2008. ~~See~~ ~~Note~~On 8February 29, ~~Financing~~2008, ~~Arrangements~~we ~~and~~repurchased $12.0 ~~Debt,~~million ~~for~~in aface ~~description~~amount of ~~the~~our ~~Exchange~~7.375% ~~Offer~~Senior ~~and~~Notes at a ~~description~~discount ofbelow the face ~~new~~value ~~Senior~~of ~~Secured~~the ~~Notes.~~notes, ~~After~~and ~~completing~~on ~~this~~April ~~refinancing~~8, ~~the~~2008 ~~Company~~we ~~had~~repurchased an additional $25.0 ~~unrestricted~~million ~~domestic~~in ~~cash~~face ~~balances~~amount of ~~approximately~~our 7.375% Senior Notes, also at a discount below the face value of the notes, leaving $1561.04 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes, which we paid at maturity on ~~April~~August 281, 2008. On ~~2009~~September 15, 2008 we sold an additional 20% of our WTS subsidiary, raising $10.1 million.

On February 26, 2009, we announced the commencement of an offer (the “Exchange Offer”) to each of the holders of our 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes and our 10.5% Senior Notes due March 28, 2009 and April 1, 2009, respectively, to exchange these notes for new notes in order to refinance those maturities. The Exchange Offer was successfully consummated on April 28, 2009. $83.3 million of the 10.5% Senior Notes and $38.3 million of the 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes were exchanged for $121.6 million of new 15% Senior Secured Notes due March 2012 (the “Senior Secured Notes”). The Senior Secured Notes mature in a lump sum on March 31, 2012. The remaining $16.1 million of 10.5% Senior Notes were repaid on April 28, 2009. See Note 8, Financing Arrangements and Debt, for a description of the Exchange Offer and a description of the new Senior Secured Notes.

(3) Restricted Cash

Our liquidity is affected by restricted cash balances, which are included in current assets and are not available for general corporate use. Restricted cash as of ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $98.20 million and $37.7 million, respectively. Restricted cash at ~~July~~October 54, 2009 included $32.5 6 million related to deposits for margin calls on our metal hedge programs, $54.5 9 million of deposits to cover our insurance reserves and $0.25 million of ~~other~~ other restricted cash deposits. Restricted cash at December 31, 2008 included $16.9 million related to deposits for margin calls on our metal hedge programs, $5.9 million on deposit to cover our insurance reserves, $14.0 million of deposits to cover our silver consignment facility and $0.9 million of other restricted cash deposits. The silver consignment facility was terminated on February 19, 2009 (see Note 8, Financing Arrangements and Debt).

(4) Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary

On March 14, 2008, the Company sold a 30.0% indirect equity interest in ~~Wolverine Tube Shanghai Co., Ltd. (“~~WTS”) to The Wieland Group (“Wieland”) for $9.5 million. The agreement provided to Wieland an option to purchase between April 2011 and April 2013 an additional 20.0% equity interest in WTS. On September 15, 2008, the Company and Wieland entered into an agreement, which granted to Wieland the right to immediately exercise the option to purchase the additional 20.0% equity interest in WTS for a purchase price of $10.1 million. Following the completion of the exercise of the 20.0% purchase option, Wieland has a 50.0% indirect ownership in the equity of WTS. From September 15, 2008, the results of WTS are accounted for using the equity method because neither party controls WTS. The payment of the $10.1 million is subject to a post-closing adjustment at the end of the first fiscal quarter of WTS in 2011 based upon the financial performance of WTS during the period beginning March 31, 2008 through the end of the first fiscal quarter of 2011. In no event will the Company be required to make a post-closing adjustment payment in excess of $2.5 million to Wieland nor will Wieland be required to make a post-closing adjustment payment in excess of $7.5 million to the Company. The $2.5 million floor has been recorded in accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total gain on the sale of the 50.0% interest was $12.3 million.

At September 15, 2008, the option to purchase the additional 20.0% equity interest in WTS had a non-cash embedded derivative value of $1.3 million. With the exercise of the purchase option, the embedded derivative has been eliminated. Pursuant to the agreements to purchase the stock, WTS applied for approval under Chinese law to add directors to the Board of WTS and change certain voting and other corporate governance matters of WTS. The parties obtained these approvals on June 29, 2009.

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we recorded $0.36 million and $01.73 million, respectively, in equity earnings from our investment in this unconsolidated subsidiary.

(5) Discontinued Operations

On February 29, 2008, we sold substantially all of the assets and liabilities of our ~~Small Tube Products (“~~STP”) business located in Altoona, Pennsylvania. ~~On November 6, 2008, the Company received a working capital settlement in the Company’s favor of approximately $2.8 million.~~ Operating results associated ~~with~~ with the STP business for the period ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008 are presented as a discontinued operation.

On July 8, 2008, we closed on the sale of our Wolverine Tube Canada, Inc. (“WTCI”) subsidiary located in London, Ontario, Canada. The subsidiary produced wholesale and commercial products for sale in the North American markets. In the transaction, we sold 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of our wholly owned subsidiary for $41.2 million. In addition, certain currency translation adjustments aggregating approximately $3.6 million included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were reclassified to earnings. Additionally, we sold certain accounts receivable of Wolverine in the amount of $2.4 million, and we received $1.8 million owed by the Canadian subsidiary to Wolverine for inventory purchased prior to the sale. Exiting the WTCI business constitutes an exit of the wholesale business for Wolverine. Operating results associated with the WTCI business for the period ~~are~~ended September 28, 2008 are presented as a discontinued operation.

See the table below for the net income results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ 29September 28, 2008 of the discontinued operations:

	Three months ended			~~Six~~Nine months ended
(In thousands)	~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Net Sales	$	~~67,171~~—		$	138,692
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	~~(5,679~~403	)		~~468~~871
Income taxes		90—			90
Net income (loss)	$	~~(5,769~~403	)	$	~~378~~781
Net income (loss) per common share - Basic	$	~~(0.14~~—	)	$	—0.01
Net income (loss) per common share - Diluted	$	~~(0.14~~—	)	$	—0.01

(6) Inventories

Inventories are as follows:

(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009		December 31, 2008
Finished products	$	2422,~~413~~472	$	27,990
Work-in-process		1211,~~887~~909		10,646
Raw materials		6,~~672~~539		9,262
Supplies		5,~~411~~129		5,386
Total	$	4946,~~383~~049	$	53,284

Included in finished products are consignment inventories of $119.17 million at ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and $12.3 million at December 31, 2008. These consignments are at various locations throughout the United States.

(7) Assets Held for Sale

As of December 31, 2008, we had recorded, based on the estimated appraisal fair value, approximately $3.7 million in assets held for sale related to the property in Decatur, Alabama. The Decatur, Alabama property is in an industrial area in north central Alabama. Issues with the Decatur facility include its size, age, and potential environmental issues depending on the use of the property. Its location on the Tennessee River in water deep enough for mooring or docking commercial or large private vessels has appeal to both commercial and industrial users. We have estimated the fair value of the land net of the cost of demolition and removal of the buildings and building material on the site. We continue to utilize a portion of the Decatur facility for product development and various sales and administrative functions.

During the first quarter of 2009 the land was reclassified from assets held for sale to property, plant and equipment due to the fact the Company has been unable to sell the property. The land is currently on the market and the Company is actively soliciting buyers.

(8) Financing Arrangements and Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			December 31, 2008
Senior Exchange Notes, 10.5%, due March 2009	$	—		$	38,300
Senior Notes, 10.5%, due April 2009		—			99,400
Discount on 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior
Exchange Notes		—			(44	)
Senior Secured Notes, 15%, due March 2012		~~122~~124,~~723~~210			—
Other foreign subsidiaries		~~1,401~~—			—
Capitalized leases		108			14
Total debt		124,~~134~~218			137,670
Less short-term borrowings		(~~1,411~~8	)		(16,112	)
Total long-term debt	$	~~122~~124,~~723~~210		$	121,558

15% Senior Secured Notes

On April 28, 2009, the Company issued $121.6 million aggregate principal amount of ~~15%~~ Senior Secured Notes ~~(the “Senior Secured Notes”) due March 2012~~ pursuant to an indenture, dated April 28, 2009, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named herein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and collateral agent (~~The~~the “Indenture”) in exchange for $38.3 million in principal amount of the 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes and $83.3 million in principal amount of the 10.5% Senior Notes (~~The~~the “Exchange Offer”). The Company redeemed $16.1 million of the 10.5% Senior Notes and paid a 3% exchange fee to holders that exchanged their notes for the Senior Secured Notes.

The terms of the Exchange Offer and new Senior Secured Notes are as follows:

The Senior Secured Notes will mature on March 31, 2012. We will pay interest on the Senior Secured Notes at 15% per annum until maturity, of which 10% is payable in cash and 5% is payable by issuing additional Senior Secured Notes (“PIK Notes”); provided however, that (a) if the outstanding principal amount of Senior Secured Notes at the close of business on March 31, 2010 exceeds $90 million, the interest rate will increase to 16%, of which 10% will be payable in cash and 6% will be payable in PIK Notes, and (b) if the outstanding principal amount of Senior Secured Notes at the close of business on March 31, 2011 exceeds $60 million, the interest rate will increase to 17%, of which 10% will be payable in cash and 7% will be payable in PIK Notes. We will pay interest semiannually on March 31 and September 30 of each year, commencing September 30, 2009. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. AsOn September 30, 2009 we paid interest of ~~July~~ $5.1 million and issued new PIK Notes in the amount of $2.6 million. As of October 4, 2009, we have accrued $20.32 million of interest on the Senior Secured Notes for the 10% which is payable in cash and have increased the principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes by $10.1 million, which represents the 5% PIK Notes.

The Senior Secured Notes are secured on a first-priority basis by substantially all of our assets and those of the subsidiary guarantors and will rank pari passu in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of our future subordinated indebtedness, if any. The Guarantee and Collateral Agreement dated April 28, 2009 provides for the unconditional guarantee by the subsidiary guarantors of the payment of the principal and interest on the Senior Secured Notes and the performance by us of all other obligations under the Indenture.

At any time and from time to time, we may redeem all or a part of the Senior Secured Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Senior Secured Notes redeemed to the applicable redemption date, subject to the rights of holders on the relevant record date to receive interest on the relevant interest payment date. Unless we default in the payment of the redemption price, interest will cease to accrue on the Senior Secured Notes or portions thereof called for redemption on the applicable redemption date. Under the Indenture, we are not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Senior Secured Notes; provided however, that if the Company grants any liens to lenders under a credit agreement, we will issue a notice of redemption to redeem an amount of Senior Secured Notes equal to 55% of “eligible NAFTA inventory” and “eligible NAFTA accounts receivable” (in each case as such terms are defined in such credit agreement). A notice of redemption will be delivered immediately prior to or concurrently with the closing of such credit agreement.

The Indenture contains covenants that limit the ability of the Company and our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends or distributions on, or redeem or repurchase capital stock; make investments; issue or sell capital stock of subsidiaries; engage in transactions with affiliates; create liens on assets; transfer or sell assets; guarantee indebtedness; restrict dividends or other payments of subsidiaries; consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries; and engage in sale/leaseback transactions.

Liquidity Facilities

At ~~July~~ 5October 4, 2009, we had no domestic credit facilities in place as all such ~~facilities~~ facilities expired or were terminated in February 2009. We believe cash on hand and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company’s ~~financial~~ financial obligations in the short term; however, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. The terms and conditions of the Company’s Senior Secured Notes have a provision that would allow the Company to secure credit facilities under certain conditions prescribed in the Indentures thereto.

As of December 31, 2008, our domestic liquidity facilities consisted of a receivables sale facility of up to $35.0 million and a secured revolving credit facility of up to $19.9 million. In addition, we maintained a silver consignment facility under which we were able to request consignments of silver with an aggregate value up to the lesser of $16.0 million or 85.0% of the aggregate undrawn face amount of letters of credit required to be provided to the facility provider.

Secured Revolving Credit Facility

On April 28, 2005, we entered into an amended and restated secured revolving credit facility with Wachovia Bank. On December 9, 2008 we reduced the maximum aggregate borrowing availability to $19.9 million. The $19.9 million was fully utilized by various Letters of Credit supporting our silver consignment facility and our insurance programs. The $19.9 million of Letters of Credit were fully cash collateralized. This amount is included in our restricted cash balance in our December 31, 2008 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. This facility matured on February 19, 2009.

Receivables Sale Facility

On April 28, 2005, we established a Receivables Sale Facility. The limit on the facility was adjusted from time to time and at December 31, 2008 was $35.0 million. In accordance with the provisions of ~~SFAS~~ASC ~~140~~860, ~~Accounting for~~ Transfers and Servicing ~~of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities~~, we included in accounts receivable in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets the portion of receivables sold to our special purpose entity receivables finance subsidiary, which ~~have~~were not ~~been~~ resold to the participating banks in the Receivables Sale Facility. Since there were no outstanding advances under the Receivables Sale Facility at December 31, 2008, the accounts receivable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was not impacted. Availability under our Receivables Sale Facility as of December 31, 2008 was $12.4 million. The Receivables Sale Facility was terminated on February 19, 2009.

Silver Consignment Facility

On February 16, 2007 we entered into a silver consignment facility with HSBC Bank USA N.A. (“HSBC”). Under the consignment facility as of December 31, 2008, we we were able to from time to time request from HSBC, and HSBC could in its sole discretion provide, consignments of silver with an aggregate value of up to the lesser of (a) $16 million or (b) 85% of the aggregate undrawn face amount of letters of credit required to be provided to HSBC pursuant to the consignment facility. The consignment of silver to us by HSBC under the consignment facility was conditioned on HSBC’s prior receipt and the continued effectiveness of letters of credit in an aggregate amount such that the value of all outstanding consigned silver under the consignment facility was not more than 85% of the aggregate undrawn face amount of the letters of credit. The facility terminated on February 19, 2009 and HSBC drew on the letters of credit to cover the cost of the consigned silver that we simultaneously purchased. The balance of the letters of credit was refunded to us by Wachovia.

Under our silver consignment and forward contracts facility in place at December 31, 2008, we had $10.3 million of silver in our inventory under the silver consignment facility, with a corresponding amount included in accounts payable and $2.1 million committed to under the forward contracts facility.

Other Credit Facilities

We have a credit facility with a Netherlands bank, payable on demand and providing for available credit of up to 2.9 million Euros or approximately $34.72 million. At ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. This credit facility is secured by certain accounts receivable and inventory. In addition, Wolverine Tube Europe B.V. has granted the bank a guarantee regarding a property lease agreement in the amount of 29.8 thousand Euros.

We previously ~~have~~had a line of credit with a Portuguese bank which ~~provides~~provided available credit of up to 1.0 million Euros ~~or approximately $1~~.~~4 million.~~ ~~Borrowings under this facility were $1.4 million and $0.0 million at July 5, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.~~ This line of credit expired on August 1, 2009 and we are in ~~the~~currently ~~process~~in ofnegotiations ~~renewing~~to renew the line of credit. ~~The interest rate is calculated as the EURIBOR (European Interbank Offer Rate) at the end of the month plus a spread of 1.5%. The interest rate as of July 5, 2009 was 2.384%.~~

10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes

As a result of the successful completion of the Exchange Offer on April 28, 2009, $83.3 million of the 10.5% Senior Notes and $38.3 million of the 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes were exchanged for Senior Secured Notes due 2012. The remaining $16.1 million of 10.5% Senior Notes were paid to the note holders on April 28, 2009.

(9) Interest Expense

The following table summarizes interest expense, net:

	Three months ended						~~Six~~Nine months ended
(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Interest expense - bonds and other	$	4,~~588~~453		$	54,~~047~~266		$	812,~~302~~755		$	1014,~~650~~916
Interest income		(4820	)		(~~162~~270	)		(~~219~~239	)		(~~812~~1,082	)
Capitalized interest		(3139	)		(2621	)		(4382	)		(3859	)
Interest expense, net	$	4,~~509~~394		$	43,~~859~~975		$	812,~~040~~434		$	913,~~800~~775

(10)	Pension Plans

Defined Contribution Plans

We have 401(k) plans covering substantially all of our U.S. employees. We recorded expense with respect to these plans of $0.4 million and $01.82 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009, respectively, and $0.~~3 million~~5 million and $1.17 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008, respectively. Contributions made under our defined contribution plans may include the following components: (i) a match, at our discretion, of employee salaries contributed to the plans; (ii) a contribution amount equal to 3% of an employee’s annual salary; (iii) a “gain share” component dependent upon us attaining certain financial performance targets; and (iv) a transition provision, providing for contributions for five years, based upon an employee’s age and years of service.

U.S. Qualified Retirement Plan

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost (benefit) for the U.S. Qualified Retirement Plan, which was frozen on February 28, 2006, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008:

	Three months ended						~~Six~~Nine months ended
(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Interest Cost	$	2,412		$	2,438		$	4,824		$	4,876
Interest cost	$	2,412		$	2,438		$	7,236		$	7,314
Expected return on plan assets		(1,806	)		(2,734	)		(35,~~612~~418	)		(58,~~468~~202	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		1,002			—			23,~~004~~006			—
Net periodic pension cost (benefit)	$	1,608		$	(296	)	$	34,~~216~~824		$	(~~592~~888	)

12U.S. Non-Qualified Retirement Plan

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the U.S. Non-~~qualified~~Qualified Retirement Plan for the three and nine months ended October 4, 2009 and September 28, 2008:

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the U.S. Non-Qualified Retirement Plan for the three and six months ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
(In thousands)	October 4, 2009		September 28, 2008		October 4, 2009		September 28, 2008
Interest cost	$	17	$	17	$	51	$	51
Net periodic pension cost	$	17	$	17	$	51	$	51

	Three months ended				Six months ended
(In thousands)	July 5, 2009		June 29, 2008		July 5, 2009		June 29, 2008
Interest Cost	$	17	$	17	$	34	$	34
Net periodic pension cost	$	17	$	17	$	34	$	34

Postretirement Benefit Obligation

During the fiscal year 2009, we expect the total U.S. and Canadian combined postretirement benefit ~~costs~~ to be $0.6 million. The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic ~~costs~~cost (benefit) for the three and nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
(In thousands)	July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008			July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008
Service Cost	$	17		$	77		$	34		$	154
Interest Cost		68			256			136			513
Amortization of prior service cost		(7	)		(8	)		(14	)		(16	)
Amortization of net actuarial gain		(220	)		(160	)		(440	)		(319	)
Curtailment gain (1)		—			—			—			(410	)
Net periodic cost (benefit)	$	(142	)	$	165		$	(284	)	$	(78	)

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
(In thousands)	October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008			October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008
Service cost	$	18		$	24		$	52		$	178
Interest cost		69			73			205			586
Amortization of prior service cost		(7	)		(8	)		(21	)		(24	)
Amortization of net actuarial gain		(221	)		(142	)		(661	)		(461	)
Curtailment gain (1)		—			—			—			(410	)
Net periodic cost (benefit)	$	(141	)	$	(53	)	$	(425	)	$	(131	)

(1)

On February 29, 2008 we sold substantially all assets and certain liabilities of our STP business. On that date, employees of the STP business accepted offers of employment with the acquiring company. Accordingly, those employees were no longer entitled to receive these benefits and a curtailment gain was recorded as noted above.

(11)	Commitments and Contingencies

We are subject to extensive environmental regulations imposed by federal, state, provincial and local authorities in the U.S., Canada, China, Portugal and Mexico with respect to emissions to air, discharges to waterways, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste materials. We have received various communications from regulatory authorities concerning certain environmental responsibilities. There were no significant changes to report from prior periods.

We have accrued undiscounted estimated environmental remediation costs of $9.54 million at ~~July~~October 54, 2009, consisting of $8.6 million for the Decatur facility and $0.98 million for the Ardmore facility. ~~Based on information currently available, we believe that the costs of these matters are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.~~ However, actual costs related to environmental matters could differ materially from the amounts we estimated and accrued at ~~July~~October 54, 2009 if these environmental matters are not resolved as anticipated.

In February 2009, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) advised the Company that it may be required to accelerate funding of certain pension related obligations as a result of the closure and/or sale of certain operations of the Company. The PBGC has not made a final determination of the amount or timing of any payments. Since February 2009, the Company and the PBGC have been engaged in discussions regarding this matter. Based upon these discussions and in consultation with special counsel, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the matter will ultimately be resolved through an agreement with the PBGC to fund an amount to be determined and paid in the future. The Company believes any such agreement would result in accelerated funding of the already accrued pension obligations. Accordingly, no additional pension accrual is required at ~~July 5,~~October 4, 2009 or December 31, 2008 since the amount and timing of additional contributions, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated.

On September 30, 2009, the Department of Commerce (“DOC”) received petitions concerning imports of seamless refined copper pipe and tube (as defined in the petition) from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) and Mexico. On October 21, 2009, based on the examinations of the petitions, the DOC initiated anti-dumping duty investigations to determine whether imports of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from the PRC and Mexico are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) made its preliminary inquiry determination on November 13, 2009. The ITC determined that there is a reasonable indication that the U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of refined copper pipe and tube from China and Mexico and, as a result, the investigations will continue. The DOC will be scheduled to make its preliminary determinations in March, 2010. Based on information currently available, there is no impact on our third quarter financial statements and we do not believe that subsequent DOC rulings on this matter will have a material impact on our business or operating results.

(12)	Litigation

Our facilities and operations are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations, and we are currently involved in various proceedings relating to environmental matters. We are not involved in any legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.

(13)	Income Taxes

As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, Wolverine was subject to examination in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction and various states for the 2004-2008 tax years. Wolverine was also subject to examination in various foreign jurisdictions for the 2002-2008 tax years. We believe appropriate provisions for all outstanding issues have been made for all jurisdictions and all open years.

For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we had a tax ~~expense~~benefit ~~was~~of $0.35 million and ~~$0.6~~for ~~million,~~the ~~respectively~~nine months ended October 4, 2009 we had a tax expense of $0.1 million attributable to taxable income at our foreign locations, an increase in accruals in Canada, and a reduction in U. S. deferred taxes associated with withholding taxes on foreign dividends. The U.S. tax benefit was totally offset by an increase in the valuation allowance attributable to the Net Operating Losses (“NOLs”). For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008, we had a tax ~~expense~~benefit ~~was~~of $0.8 million and for the nine months ended September 28, 2008 we had tax expense of $1.90 million, ~~respectively, also~~ attributable to taxable income at our foreign locations. Tax benefit in the U.S. operations and tax expense in our Canadian locations were offset by adjustments in the valuation allowance in those tax jurisdictions. For all periods, the effective tax rate was not meaningful given tax expense divided by a pretax loss caused by adjustments to the valuation allowance.

(14)	Industry Segments

For internal purposes, we prepare business unit operating statements (operating segment level), which include net sales, metal costs, production costs, operating income, and Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation Amortization (“EBITDA”) for one operating segment (or business unit): Wolverine ~~Tube Consolidated~~consolidated. Historically, we have reviewed the financial operations of our business from a wholesale and commercial standpoint. In the second quarter of 2008, we closed our facility in Decatur, Alabama, which included substantially all of our wholesale business. In July 2008 we sold the London, Canada facility, ~~which~~ which produced the remaining amount of our wholesale products and dissolved the wholesale business unit at that time. The wholesale business segment results were previously reported within our wholesale segment reporting group. The related revenue and expenses of the wholesale segment were at one time material to our consolidated results, and this business unit was dissolved rather than being merged into another business unit. Accordingly, we have removed the historical results for the wholesale segment and its results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008 are classified as discontinued operations. In addition, no goodwill was allocated to this business unit and no intangible assets were on the books prior to the dissolution of the business unit. Accordingly, there was no related write-off of goodwill or write-down of intangible assets as a result of the dissolution of this business unit. With the elimination of our wholesale ~~products~~ segment, the Company now has only one business segment, commercial products.

(15)	Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table summarizes comprehensive income (loss):

	Three months ended						~~Six~~Nine months ended
(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Net income (loss)	$	(117,~~083~~202	)	$	(1123,~~859~~908	)	$	(1825,~~318~~520	)	$	(731,~~667~~575	)
Translation adjustment for financial statements denominated in a foreign currency		827			639			(360	)		2,982
Translation adjustment for financial statements denominated in a
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges		1,431			489			4,975			389
foreign currency		711			(3,780	)		351			(798	)
Recognized gain (loss) related to pension and post-retirement benefit plans		811			(205	)		1,593			(274	)
Translation adjustment recognized in sale of Montreal		—			(3,561	)		—			(3,561	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(8,014	)	$	(10,936	)	$	(12,110	)	$	(4,570	)
Translation adjustment recognized in sale of London		—			(9,440	)		—			(9,440	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges		597			(453	)		5,572			(64	)
Recognized gain (loss) related to pension and post-retirement benefit plans		817			2,937			2,410			2,663
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(5,077	)	$	(38,205	)	$	(17,187	)	$	(42,775	)

(16)	Earnings (Loss) Per Share

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008, we accounted ~~for~~ for earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ~~EITF~~ASC ~~Issue No. 03-6~~260, ~~Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement 128 (~~“~~EITF~~Earnings ~~03-6~~Per Share”), which established standards regarding the computation of earnings (loss) per share by companies that have securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company. ~~EITF~~Earnings ~~03-6 requires earnings~~ available to common stockholders for the period, after deduction of preferred stock dividends, are required to be allocated between the common and preferred stockholders based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Basic earnings (loss) per share is then calculated by dividing the net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. ~~EITF~~Presentations ~~03-6 does not require the presentation~~ of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for securities other than common stock are not required. Therefore, the following earnings (loss) per share amounts only pertain to common stock.

~~Under the~~Diluted ~~guidance of EITF 03-6, diluted~~ earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing income (loss) allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive common stock such as stock options, unvested restricted stock and preferred stock. To the extent that stock options, unvested restricted stock, and preferred stock are anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share ~~in accordance with SFAS No~~. ~~128, Earnings Per Share (“SFAS 128”),.~~ For the three and ~~six~~ nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008 all such potential common stock is anti-dilutive and as such there is no difference between basic and diluted EPS.

The calculation of net income (loss) per share for the three and nine month periods ended October 4, 2009 and September 28, 2008 is presented below:

The calculation of net income (loss) per share for the three and six month periods ended July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008 is presented below:

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
(In thousands except per share amounts)	October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008			October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss)	$	(7,202	)	$	(23,908	)	$	(25,520	)	$	(31,575	)
Less: accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,255			1,255			3,766			3,766
Less: preferred stock dividends		2,242			1,951			6,526			4,767
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders	$	(10,699	)	$	(27,114	)	$	(35,812	)	$	(40,108	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			403			—			781
Net (loss) from continuing operations	$	(10,699	)	$	(27,517	)	$	(35,812	)	$	(40,889	)

Amount allocable to common stockholders from continuing operations (1)		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Amount allocable to common stockholders from discontinued operations (1)		0	%		41	%		0	%		41	%
Net loss from continuing operations allocated to common stockholders	$	(10,699	)	$	(27,517	)	$	(35,812	)	$	(40,889	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations allocable to common stockholders	$	—		$	165		$	—		$	320

Basic weighted average number of common shares (2)		40,624			40,624			40,624			40,624

Basic income (loss) per share – Two-class Method
Continuing operations	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.88	)	$	(1.01	)
Discontinued operations (1)		—			—			—			0.01
Net loss per common share	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.88	)	$	(1.00	)

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	(10,699	)	$	(27,114	)	$	(35,812	)	$	(40,108	)
Plus: accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,255			1,255			3,766			3,766
Plus: preferred stock dividends		2,242			1,951			6,526			4,767
Income (loss) available to common stockholders in addition to assumed conversions	$	(7,202	)	$	(23,908	)	$	(25,520	)	$	(31,575	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			403			—			781
Net loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders in addition to assumed conversions	$	(7,202	)	$	(24,311	)	$	(25,520	)	$	(32,356	)

Amount allocable to common stockholders (1)		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Amount allocable to common stockholders from discontinued operations (1)		0	%		41	%		0	%		41	%
Net loss from continuing operations allocable to common stockholders	$	(10,699	)	$	(27,517	)	$	(35,812	)	$	(40,889	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations allocable to common stockholders	$	—		$	165		$	—		$	320

Diluted weighted average number of common shares (2)		40,624			40,624			40,624			40,624

Diluted income (loss) per share – Two-class Method
Continuing operations	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.88	)	$	(1.01	)
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			0.01
Net loss per common share	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.88	)	$	(1.00	)

	Three months ended						Six months ended
(In thousands except per share amounts)	July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008			July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss)	$	(11,083	)	$	(11,859	)	$	(18,318	)	$	(7,667	)
Less: accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,256			1,255			2,511			2,510
Less: preferred stock dividends		2,176			1,625			4,284			2,816
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders	$	(14,515	)	$	(14,739	)	$	(25,113	)	$	(12,993	)
Income from discontinued operations		—			(5,769	)		—			377
Net (loss) from continuing operations	$	(14,515	)	$	(8,970	)	$	(25,113	)	$	(13,370	)
Amount allocable to common stockholders from continuing operations (1)		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Amount allocable to common stockholders from discontinued operations (1)		0	%		100	%		0	%		41	%
Net loss from continuing operations allocated to common stockholders	$	(14,515	)	$	(8,970	)	$	(25,113	)	$	(13,370	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations allocable to common stockholders	$	—		$	(5,769	)	$	—		$	155
Basic weighted average number of common shares (2)		40,624			40,624			40,624			40,624
Basic income (loss) per share – Two-class Method
Continuing operations	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.33	)
Discontinued operations (1)		—			(0.14	)		—			—
Net loss per common share	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.33	)
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	(14,515	)	$	(14,739	)	$	(25,113	)	$	(12,993	)
Plus: accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,256			1,255			2,511			2,510
Plus: preferred stock dividends		2,176			1,625			4,284			2,816
Income (loss) available to common stockholders in addition to assumed conversions	$	(11,083	)	$	(11,859	)	$	(18,318	)	$	(7,667	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			(5,769	)		—			377
Net loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders in addition to assumed conversions	$	(11,083	)	$	(6,090	)	$	(18,318	)	$	(8,044	)
Amount allocable to common stockholders (1)		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Amount allocable to common stockholders from discontinued operations (1)		0	%		100	%		0	%		41	%
Net loss from continuing operations allocable to common stockholders	$	(14,515	)	$	(8,970	)	$	(25,113	)	$	(13,370	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations allocable to common stockholders	$	—		$	(5,769	)	$	—		$	155
Diluted weighted average number of common shares (2)		40,624			40,624			40,624			40,624
Diluted income (loss) per share – Two-class Method
Continuing operations	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.33	)
Discontinued operations		—			(0.14	)		—			—
Net loss per common share	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.33	)

(1) Amount allocable to common stockholders is calculated as the weighted average number of common shares outstanding divided by the sum of common and preferred shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended October 4, 2009 and September 28, 2008. In computing basic EPS using the two-class method, we have not allocated the loss available to common stockholders for the three and nine months ended October 4, 2009 and September 28, 2008 between common and preferred stockholders since the preferred stockholders do not have a contractual obligation to share in the net losses.

(12) ~~Amount~~ ~~allocable~~ Due to ~~common~~their ~~stockholders~~antidilutive iseffect, ~~calculated as~~ the ~~weighted~~following ~~average number~~potential of common shares ~~outstanding~~have ~~divided~~been excluded byfrom the ~~sum~~computation of ~~common~~diluted ~~and~~loss ~~preferred shares~~per ~~outstanding~~share ~~for~~as ~~the~~of ~~three~~October 4, 2009 and ~~six~~September ~~months~~28, ~~ended~~2008: ~~July~~13.3 5,million ~~2009~~ and ~~June~~14.4 29million, respectively of stock ~~2008~~options; 49. In5 ~~computing~~million ~~basic~~shares ~~EPS~~from ~~using~~ the ~~two-class~~conversion ~~method,~~of weSeries ~~have~~A ~~not~~Convertible ~~allocated~~Preferred ~~the~~Stock ~~loss~~for ~~available~~each toperiod; ~~common~~and ~~stockholders~~9.1 ~~for~~million ~~the~~shares ~~three~~from ~~and~~the ~~six~~conversion ~~months~~of ~~ended~~Series ~~July~~B 5,Convertible ~~2009~~Preferred ~~and~~Stock ~~June~~for ~~29,~~each ~~2008~~period. ~~between~~Also ~~common~~excluded ~~and~~from ~~preferred stockholders~~the ~~since~~computation ~~the~~of ~~preferred~~diluted ~~stockholders~~loss doper ~~not~~share ~~have~~as aof ~~contractual~~October ~~obligation~~4, to2009 are restricted share inawards ~~the~~of ~~net losses~~40,000.

(2) Due to their antidilutive effect, the following potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as of July 5, 2009 and June 29, 2008: 13.9 million and 14.1 million, respectively of stock options; 49.5 million shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for each period; and 9.1 million of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for each period. Also excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as of July 5, 2009 are restricted share awards of 40,000.

(17)	Stock-Based Compensation Plans

At ~~July~~ 5October 4, 2009, we had stock-based outside director, employee and non-employee ~~awards~~ awards associated with our 2007 Non-Qualified Stock-Based compensation plan. Valuation of the stock based awards is calculated in accordance with ~~Statement~~ASC of718, ~~Financial Accounting Standards 123(R) Share-Based Payment (~~“~~SFAS123(R)~~Stock Compensation”). The amount of compensation expense recorded for the three ~~and~~ ~~six~~and nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 is $6243 thousand and $0.12 million, respectively. The amount of compensation expense recorded for the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ 29September 28, 2008 is $0.43 million and $1.24 million, respectively. The amount remaining to be expensed through the end of the third quarter of 2013 is $0.12 million. There have been no grants, employee or non-employee, issued during 2009.

(18)	Restructuring and Other Charges

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 we continued to recognize ~~expense~~ expense associated with the closure of our Booneville, Mississippi facility and ~~the~~ the significant downsizing of our Decatur, Alabama facility, as well as ~~severance~~ severance charges in connection with our continued SG&A restructuring effort. We also recognized severance charges ~~having~~related to ~~do with~~ headcount reductions and ~~the~~ the realigned operations at our Monterrey, Mexico facility.

We recognized an expense during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 associated with restructuring activities before tax totaling $01.7 million and $13.52 million, respectively.

The following sets forth the major types of costs associated with our active restructuring activities:

~~Booneville, Mississippi Closing~~15

	Booneville, Mississippi Closing
					Cumulative
	Three months ended		~~Six~~Nine months ended		incurred through
(In thousands)	~~July~~October 54, 2009		~~July~~October 54, 2009		~~July~~October 54, 2009
Major Type Costs
Impair and liquidate current assets	$	—	$	—	$	915
Employee related costs		—		—		156
Post closing cost		37—		67		1,662
Fixed asset impairment		—		—		3,049
Total	$	37—	$	67	$	5,782
	Decatur, Alabama Reduction
(In thousands)	Three months ended October 4, 2009		Nine months ended October 4, 2009		Cumulative incurred through October 4, 2009
Major Type Costs
Impair and liquidate current assets	$	—	$	—	$	6,517
Employee related costs		2		109		3,140
Environmental remediation		—		—		8,608
Post closing cost		210		550		4,773
Other costs / currency		—		—		759
Fixed asset impairment		—		—		40,134
Total	$	212	$	659	$	63,931
	Monterrey, Mexico Reduction
(In thousands)	Three months ended October 4, 2009		Nine months ended October 4, 2009		Cumulative incurred through October 4, 2009
Major Type Costs
Post closing cost	$	136	$	136	$	136
Impair and liquidate current assets		250		380		380
Employee related costs		249		472		472
Total	$	635	$	988	$	988
	Corporate SG&A Reduction
(In thousands)	Three months ended October 4, 2009		Nine months ended October 4, 2009		Cumulative incurred through October 4, 2009
Major Type Costs
Employee related costs	$	884	$	1,516	$	2,047
Post retirement benefit gain		—		—		(208	)
Other costs / currency		—		10		159
Total	$	884	$	1,526	$	1,998
(In thousands)	Three months ended October 4, 2009		Nine months ended October 4, 2009		Cumulative incurred through October 4, 2009
Grand Total	$	1,731	$	3,240	$	72,699

At the end of the third quarter of 2009, we had accrued $8.6 million related to the restructuring of our North American operations for potential environmental charges at our Decatur, Alabama ~~Reduction~~ facility.

					Cumulative
	Three months ended		Six months ended		incurred through
(In thousands)	July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009
Major Type Costs
Impair and liquidate current assets	$	—	$	—	$	6,517
Employee related costs		11		107		3,138
Environmental remediation		—		—		8,608
Post closing cost		189		340		4,563
Other costs / currency		—		—		759
Fixed asset impairment		—		—		40,134
Total	$	200	$	447	$	63,719

Monterrey, Mexico Reduction

					Cumulative
	Three months ended		Six months ended		incurred through
(In thousands)	July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009
Major Type Costs
Impair and liquidate current assets	$	130	$	130	$	130
Employee related costs		140		223		223
Total	$	270	$	353	$	353

Corporate SG&A Reduction

					Cumulative
	Three months ended		Six months ended		incurred through
(In thousands)	July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009
Major Type Costs
Employee related costs	$	200	$	632	$	1,163
Post retirement benefit gain		—		—		(208	)
Other costs / currency		10		10		159
Total	$	210	$	642	$	1,114

					Cumulative
	Three months ended		Six months ended		incurred through
(In thousands)	July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009		July 5, 2009
Grand Total	$	717	$	1,509	$	70,968

At the end of the second quarter of 2009, we had accrued $8.6 million related to the restructuring of our North American operations for potential environmental charges at our Decatur, Alabama facility.

(19)	Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information for: (a) Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the “Parent”) on a stand-alone basis; (b) on a combined basis, the guarantors of the 15% Senior Secured Notes (~~Subsidiary~~the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), which include TF Investor, Inc.; Tube Forming, L.P.; Wolverine Finance, LLC; Wolverine PA, LLC; Wolverine Joining Technologies, LLC; and Tube ~~Forming~~ Forming Holdings, Inc.; and (c) on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, which include 3072452 Nova Scotia Company; 3072453 Nova Scotia Company; Wolverine Tube Canada Limited Partnership; Wolverine Shanghai Metals; ~~Wolverine~~ Wolverine European Holdings BV; Wolverine Tube Europe BV; Wolverine Tube, BV; ~~Wolverine~~ Wolverine Tubagem (Portugal), Lda; Wolverine Joining Technologies Canada, Inc.; ~~Wolverine~~ Wolverine Asia, Limited; WLVN de Latinoamerica, S. de R.L. de C.V.; and WLV Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. Each of the Subsidiary Guarantors is 100% owned by the Parent. The guarantees issued by each of the Subsidiary Guarantors are full, unconditional, joint and several. Accordingly, separate financial statements of the 100% owned Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the Subsidiary Guarantors are jointly, severally and unconditionally liable under the guarantees, and we believe separate financial statements and other disclosures regarding the Subsidiary Guarantors are not material to investors. Furthermore, there are no significant legal restrictions on the Parent’s ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.

The Parent is comprised of Oklahoma and Tennessee manufacturing operations and certain corporate management, sales and marketing, information services, product development, the Precision Tool Center and finance functions located in Alabama.

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands)	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	7990,~~494~~420		$	2421,~~684~~816		$	109,~~954~~444		$	(13,~~552~~718	)	$	~~113~~117,~~580~~962
Cost of goods sold		7889,~~290~~729			2220,651			98,~~609~~193			(13,~~552~~718	)		~~108~~114,~~998~~855
Gross profit		~~1,204~~691			21,~~033~~165			1,~~345~~251			—			43,~~582~~107
Selling, general and administrative expenses		54,~~920~~447			~~482~~555			~~471~~529			—			65,~~873~~531
Advisory fees and expenses		~~(44~~2	)		—			12—			—			~~(32~~2	)
Restructuring and impairment charges		~~483~~1,346			~~234~~385			—			—			~~717~~1,731
Operating income (loss)		(5,~~155~~104	)		~~1,317~~225			~~862~~722			—			(24,~~976~~157	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest (income) expense, net		4,~~516~~418			(76	)		—(18	)		—			4,~~509~~394
Amortization expense		62			—			—			—			62
Loss on extinguishment of debt		3,647			—			—			—			3,647
Other, net		12			14			(252	)		—			(226	)
Other, net		2,151			(85	)		(2,102	)		—			(36	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		724			—			—			(724	)		—
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		3,483			—			—			(3,483	)		—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and income taxes		(8,872	)		217			992			(724	)		(8,387	)
Net income (loss)		(12,048	)		1,409			2,964			(3,483	)		(11,158	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		658			—			—			—			658
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		(338	)		—			—			—			(338	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		1,012			(126	)		(359	)		—			527
Income tax expense (benefit)		(627	)		606			284			—			263
Net income (loss)		(7,202	)		91			633			(724	)		(7,202	)
Net income (loss)		(11,083	)		803			2,680			(3,483	)		(11,083	)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,255			—			—			—			1,255
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,256			—			—			—			1,256
Preferred stock dividends		2,242			—			—			—			2,242
Preferred stock dividends		2,176			—			—			—			2,176
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(10,699	)	$	91		$	633		$	(724	)	$	(10,699	)
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(14,515	)	$	803		$	2,680		$	(3,483	)	$	(14,515	)

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands)	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	~~174~~160,~~606~~997		$	4038,~~726~~120		$	3533,~~923~~830		$	(51,~~744~~899	)	$	~~245~~231,~~511~~048
Cost of goods sold		~~169~~157,~~812~~395			3736,~~592~~487			3530,~~909~~266			(51,~~744~~899	)		~~237~~222,~~569~~249
Gross profit		43,~~794~~602			31,~~134~~633			143,564			—			78,~~942~~799
Selling, general and administrative expenses		54,~~001~~651			~~592~~601			~~653~~432			—			65,~~246~~684
Net loss on divestitures		—(10,945	)		—			~~378~~(10,766	)		—			~~378~~(21,711	)
Advisory fees and expenses		27239			—			—			—			27239
Restructuring and impairment charges		282			—			841			—			1,123
Goodwill impairment		—			44,000			—			—			44,000
Operating income (loss)		(516	)		2,542			(1,858	)		—			168
Restructuring and impairment charges		280			—			65			—			345
Operating income (loss)		9,377			(42,968	)		13,833			—			(19,758	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest (income) expense, net		45,~~406~~176			(~~105~~33	)		~~558~~(1,168	)		—			43,~~859~~975
Amortization expense		~~659~~688			—			~~(85~~178	)		—			~~574~~866
Loss on sale of receivables		—			—			~~103~~167			—			~~103~~167
Embedded derivatives mark to fair value		—			—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Other, net		(1,498	)		251			1,509			—			262
Other, net		4,627			155			(5,038	)		—			(256	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(29,953	)		—			—			29,953			—
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		4,449			—			—			(4,449	)		—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and income taxes		(24,942	)		(43,186	)		13,147			29,953			(25,028	)
Loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes		(5,759	)		2,492			2,607			(4,449	)		(5,109	)
Non-controlling interest		(266	)		—			—			—			(266	)
Non-controlling interest		194			—			—			—			194
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		138			—			—			—			138
Income tax expense (benefit)		137			(90	)		740			—			787
Income tax benefit (expense)		759			290			(204	)		—			845
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(624,~~090~~311	)		2(42,~~582~~896	)		112,~~867~~943			(429,~~449~~953	)		(624,~~090~~311	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(5,769	)		—			—			—			(5,769	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		403			—			—			—			403
Net income (loss)		(1123,~~859~~908	)		2(42,~~582~~896	)		112,~~867~~943			(429,~~449~~953	)		(1123,~~859~~908	)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		1,255			—			—			—			1,255
Preferred stock dividends		1,~~625~~951			—			—			—			1,~~625~~951
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(1427,~~739~~114	)	$	2(42,~~582~~896	)	$	112,~~867~~943		$	(429,~~449~~953	)	$	(1427,~~739~~114	)

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands)	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	~~154~~244,~~026~~446		$	4567,~~349~~165		$	2635,~~402~~846		$	(26,~~595~~313	)	$	~~223~~341,~~182~~144
Cost of goods sold		~~151~~241,~~599~~328			4162,~~941~~592			2432,~~080~~273			(26,~~595~~313	)		~~215~~329,~~025~~880
Gross profit		23,~~427~~118			34,~~408~~573			23,~~322~~573			—			811,~~157~~264
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1014,~~536~~983			~~992~~1,547			~~995~~1,524			—			1218,~~523~~054
Advisory fees and expenses		~~254~~256			—			12			—			~~266~~268
Restructuring and impairment charges		12,~~253~~599			~~256~~641			—			—			13,~~509~~240
Operating income (loss)		(914,~~616~~720	)		2,~~160~~385			12,~~315~~037			—			(610,~~141~~298	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest (income) expense, net		812,~~062~~480			(6571	)		4325			—			812,~~040~~434
Amortization expense		~~770~~832			—			33			—			~~803~~865
Loss on extinguishment of debt		3,647			—			—			—			3,647
Loss from extinguishment of debt		3,647			—			—			—			3,647
Other, net		4,~~231~~243			(6147	)		(4,~~427~~679	)		—			(~~257~~483	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		67,~~421~~145			—			—			(67,~~421~~145	)		—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and income taxes		(1928,~~905~~777	)		2,~~286~~503			56,~~666~~658			(67,~~421~~145	)		(1826,~~374~~761	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		~~(679~~1,337	)		—			—			—			~~(679~~1,337	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(908	)		899			632			—			623
Income tax benefit (expense)		1,920			(1,025	)		(991	)		—			(96	)
Net income (loss)		(1825,~~318~~520	)		1,~~387~~478			5,~~034~~667			(67,~~421~~145	)		(1825,~~318~~520	)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		23,~~511~~766			—			—			—			23,~~511~~766
Preferred stock dividends		46,~~284~~526			—			—			—			46,~~284~~526
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(2535,~~113~~812	)	$	1,~~387~~478		$	5,~~034~~667		$	(67,~~421~~145	)	$	(2535,~~113~~812	)

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands)	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	~~311~~472,~~702~~699		$	75113,~~505~~625		$	70104,~~866~~696		$	(1113,~~103~~002	)	$	~~446~~678,~~970~~018
Cost of goods sold		~~302~~459,~~397~~792			72108,~~130~~617			6494,~~601~~867			(1113,~~103~~002	)		~~428~~650,~~025~~274
Gross profit		912,~~305~~907			35,~~375~~008			69,~~265~~829			—			1827,~~945~~744
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1015,~~762~~413			1,~~204~~805			1,~~215~~647			—			1318,~~181~~865
Net (gain) on divestitures		—(10,945	)		—			(515,~~004~~770	)		—			(526,~~004~~715	)
Advisory fees and expenses		~~552~~791			—			—			—			~~552~~791
Restructuring and impairment charges		3,812			—			1,248			—			5,060
Goodwill impairment		—			44,000			—			—			44,000
Operating income (loss)		(5,821	)		2,171			8,806			—			5,156
Restructuring and impairment charges		4,092			—			1,313			—			5,405
Operating income (loss)		3,556			(40,797	)		22,639			—			(14,602	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest (income) expense, net		813,~~809~~985			(~~294~~327	)		~~1,285~~117			—			913,~~800~~775
Amortization expense		1,~~140~~828			—			~~131~~309			—			12,~~271~~137
Loss on sale of receivables		—			—			~~207~~374			—			~~207~~374
Embedded derivatives mark to fair value		—			—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Other, net		3,407			607			(3,992	)		—			22
Other, net		4,905			356			(5,498	)		—			(237	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(17,750	)		—			—			17,750			—
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		12,203			—			—			(12,203	)		—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and income taxes		(33,414	)		(41,077	)		25,831			17,750			(30,910	)
Loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes		(8,472	)		2,109			12,684			(12,203	)		(5,882	)
Non-controlling interest		(541	)		—			—			—			(541	)
Non-controlling interest		275			—			—			—			275
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		138			—			—			—			138
Income tax expense (benefit)		(702	)		749			1,841			—			1,888
Income tax benefit (expense)		1,461			(459	)		(2,045	)		—			(1,043	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(832,~~045~~356	)		1(41,~~360~~536	)		1023,~~843~~786			~~(12~~17,~~203~~750	)		(832,~~045~~356	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		378			—			—			—			378
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		781			—			—			—			781
Net income (loss)		(731,~~667~~575	)		1(41,~~360~~536	)		1023,~~843~~786			~~(12~~17,~~203~~750	)		(731,~~667~~575	)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock		23,~~511~~766			—			—			—			23,~~511~~766
Preferred stock dividends		24,~~816~~767			—			—			—			24,~~816~~767
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(1240,~~994~~108	)	$	1(41,~~360~~536	)	$	1023,~~843~~786		$	~~(12~~17,~~203~~750	)	$	(1240,~~994~~108	)

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

~~July~~October 54, 2009

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands)	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1817,~~534~~292		$	—		$	56,~~928~~142		$	—		$	2423,~~462~~434
Restricted cash		97,~~016~~807			—			~~223~~239			—			98,~~239~~046
Accounts receivable, net		3031,~~110~~717			98,~~139~~779			64,~~398~~171			—			4544,~~647~~667
Inventories		2019,~~408~~662			2019,~~597~~162			87,~~378~~225			—			4946,~~383~~049
Derivative assets		~~858~~1,006			—			—			—			~~858~~1,006
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,~~265~~623			~~1,246~~872			~~399~~414			—			2,~~910~~909
Total current assets		8079,~~191~~107			3028,~~982~~813			2118,~~326~~191			—			~~132~~126,~~499~~111
Property, plant and equipment, net		2728,~~670~~292			13,~~921~~511			13,~~795~~580			—			55,~~386~~383
Intangible assets and deferred charges, net		2,~~576~~593			—			1541			—			2,~~591~~634
Notes receivable		—			—			~~576~~595			—			~~576~~595
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary		107,~~053~~909			—			—			—			107,~~053~~909
Investment in subsidiaries		~~333~~335,~~628~~305			325			—			(~~333~~335,~~953~~630	)		—
Total assets	$	~~454~~453,~~118~~206		$	4542,~~228~~649		$	3532,~~712~~407		$	(~~333~~335,~~953~~630	)	$	~~201~~192,~~105~~632
Liabilities and Accumulated Deficit
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	2125,~~371~~116		$	42,~~373~~166		$	54,~~518~~185		$	—		$	31,~~262~~467
Accrued liabilities		(1215,~~962~~941	)		2021,~~876~~092			21,~~362~~228			—			106,~~276~~379
Derivative liabilities		2,~~291~~670			—			—			—			2,~~291~~670
Deferred income taxes		~~932~~(408	)		~~(211~~651	)		~~137~~82			—			~~858~~325
Short-term borrowings		—			—			~~1,411~~8			—			~~1,411~~8
Intercompany balances, net		~~285~~287,~~124~~933			(~~262~~264,~~279~~119	)		(2223,~~845~~814	)		—			—
Total current liabilities		~~296~~299,~~756~~370			(~~237~~240,~~241~~210	)		(1318,~~417~~311	)		—			4640,~~098~~849
Long-term debt		~~122~~124,~~723~~210			—			—			—			~~122~~124,~~723~~210
Pension liabilities		4546,~~853~~456			—			—			—			4546,~~853~~456
Postretirement benefits obligation		3,~~250~~188			—			1,~~194~~197			—			4,~~444~~385
Accrued environmental remediation		9,~~477~~393			—			—			—			9,~~477~~393
Deferred income taxes, non-current		3,~~549~~250			(3,~~549~~250	)		—			—			—
Accrued dividends		912,~~760~~003			—			—			—			912,~~760~~003
Other liabilities		32,~~128~~981			—			—			—			32,~~128~~981
Total liabilities		~~494~~500,~~496~~851			(~~240~~243,~~790~~460	)		(1217,~~223~~114	)		—			~~241~~240,~~483~~277
Preferred Stock		2627,~~119~~374			—			—			—			2627,~~119~~374
Accumulated deficit		(6675,~~497~~019	)		286,~~018~~109			4749,~~935~~521			(~~333~~335,~~953~~630	)		(6675,~~497~~019	)
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and accumulated deficit	$	~~454~~453,~~118~~206		$	4542,~~228~~649		$	3532,~~712~~407		$	(~~333~~335,~~953~~630	)	$	~~201~~192,~~105~~632

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

December 31, 2008

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands)	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	18,778		$	—		$	14,759		$	—		$	33,537
Restricted cash		37,173			1			564			—			37,738
Accounts receivable, net		4,362			8,338			25,926			—			38,626
Inventories		18,605			23,366			11,313			—			53,284
Assets held for sale		3,680			—			—			—			3,680
Derivative assets		291			—			—			—			291
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,514			3,575			291			—			5,380
Total current assets		84,403			35,280			52,853			—			172,536
Property, plant and equipment, net		23,033			14,644			14,327			—			52,004
Intangible assets and deferred charges, net		2,588			5			41			—			2,634
Notes receivable		—			—			585			—			585
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary		9,373			—			—			—			9,373
Investment in subsidiaries		357,759			325			—			(358,084	)		—
Total assets	$	477,156		$	50,254		$	67,806		$	(358,084	)	$	237,132
Liabilities and Accumulated Deficit
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	16,190		$	12,315		$	6,208		$	—		$	34,713
Accrued liabilities		8,567			2,684			1,999			—			13,250
Derivative liabilities		5,415			—			—			—			5,415
Deferred income taxes		1,561			(211	)		251			—			1,601
Short-term borrowings		16,098			—			14			—			16,112
Intercompany balances, net		261,022			(239,316	)		(21,706	)		—			—
Total current liabilities		308,853			(224,528	)		(13,234	)		—			71,091
Long-term debt		121,558			—			—			—			121,558
Pension liabilities		45,552			—			—			—			45,552
Postretirement benefits obligation		3,375			—			1,287			—			4,662
Accrued environmental remediation		9,628			—			—			—			9,628
Deferred income taxes, non-current		3,549			(3,549	)		—			—			—
Accrued dividends		5,476			—			—			—			5,476
Other liabilities		3,290			—			—			—			3,290
Total liabilities		501,281			(228,077	)		(11,947	)		—			261,257
Preferred Stock		23,608			—			—			—			23,608
Accumulated deficit		(47,733	)		278,331			79,753			(358,084	)		(47,733	)
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and accumulated deficit	$	477,156		$	50,254		$	67,806		$	(358,084	)	$	237,132
accumulated deficit	$	477,156		$	50,254		$	67,806		$	(358,084	)	$	237,132

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands )	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(1825,~~318~~520	)	$	1,~~387~~478		$	5,~~034~~667		$	(67,~~421~~145	)	$	(1825,~~318~~520	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities:
operating activities:
Depreciation		2,583			1,498			703			—			4,784
Depreciation		1,729			1,005			455			—			3,189
Amortization		882			—			110			—			992
Amortization		794			—			85			—			879
Deferred income taxes		(2,270	)		1,161			(164	)		—			(1,273	)
Deferred income taxes		(630	)		—			(106	)		—			(736	)
(Gain) on sale of fixed assets		(316	)		—			—			—			(316	)
(Gain) on sale of fixed assets		(273	)		—			—			—			(273	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		3,647			—			—			—			3,647
Non-cash paid-in-kind interest		12,~~165~~652			—			—			—			12,~~165~~652
Non-cash environmental, restructuring and other charges		(88164	)		—			~~227~~412			—			~~139~~248
Stock compensation expense		~~144~~187			—			—			—			~~144~~187
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		(679	)		—			—			—			(679	)
Impairment of assets		—			—			250			—			250
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(6,421	)		—			—			6,421			—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		(1,337	)		—			—			—			(1,337	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		(22,784	)		(4,831	)		21,742			—			(5,873	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(7,145	)		—			—			7,145			—
Net cash from continuing operating activities		(41,714	)		(2,439	)		27,437			—			(16,716	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		(21,518	)		(4,654	)		23,124			—			(3,048	)
Net cash from discontinued operating activities		(31	)		—			—			—			(31	)
Net cash from continuing operating activities		(48,319	)		(517	)		30,102			—			(18,734	)
Net cash from operating activities		(41,745	)		(2,439	)		27,437			—			(16,747	)
Net cash from discontinued operating activities		(32	)		—			—			—			(32	)
Net cash from operating activities		(48,351	)		(517	)		30,102			—			(18,766	)
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(24,~~774~~291	)		(~~280~~364	)		~~200~~300			—			(24,~~854~~355	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		~~273~~316			—			—			—			~~273~~316
Purchase of patents		(~~103~~159	)		—			—			—			(~~103~~159	)
Change in restricted cash		2829,~~157~~366			1			~~341~~325			—			2829,~~499~~692
Net cash from continuing investing activities		25,~~553~~232			(~~279~~363	)		~~541~~625			—			25,~~815~~494
Net cash from discontinued investing activities		1,200			—			—			—			1,200
Net cash from investing activities		26,~~753~~432			(~~279~~363	)		~~541~~625			—			2726,~~015~~694
Financing Activities
Financing fees and expenses paid		(4,~~391~~384	)		—			—			—			(4,~~391~~384	)
Payments under revolving credit facilities and other debt		—			—			(791,490	)		—			(791,490	)
Borrowings from revolving credit facilities and other debt		—			—			1,399			—			1,399
Dividend from unconsolidated subsidiary		2,802			—			—			—			2,802
Purchase or repayment of senior notes		(16,142	)		—			—			—			(16,142	)
Intercompany borrowings (payments)		3538,~~293~~150			~~2,718~~880			(3839,~~011~~030	)		—			—
Net cash from financing activities		1420,~~760~~426			~~2,718~~880			(3639,~~691~~121	)		—			(1917,~~213~~815	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		~~(12~~7	)		—			(~~118~~223	)		—			(~~130~~216	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(~~244~~1,486	)		—			(8,~~831~~617	)		—			(910,~~075~~103	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,778			—			14,759			—			33,537
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1817,~~534~~292		$	—		$	56,~~928~~142		$	—		$	2423,~~462~~434

Wolverine Tube, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008

(Unaudited)

							Non-
				Subsidiary			Guarantor
(In thousands )	Parent			Guarantors			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating Activities
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(832,~~045~~356	)	$	1(41,~~360~~536	)	$	1023,~~843~~786		$	~~(12~~17,~~203~~750	)	$	(832,~~045~~356	)
Income from discontinued operations		~~378~~781			—			—			—			~~378~~781
Net income (loss)		(731,~~667~~575	)		1(41,~~360~~536	)		1023,~~843~~786			~~(12~~17,~~203~~750	)		(731,~~667~~575	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities:
operating activities:
Depreciation		2,181			1,438			1,190			—			4,809
Depreciation		1,454			959			826			—			3,239
Amortization		1,860			—			395			—			2,255
Amortization		1,161			—			307			—			1,468
Deferred income taxes		8,419			(9,927	)		56			—			(1,452	)
Deferred income taxes		(174	)		93			(83	)		—			(164	)
Gain on early extinguishment of debt		(858	)		—			—			—			(858	)
Non-controlling interest in Chinese subsidiary		~~275~~541			—			—			—			~~275~~541
Change in embedded derivative mark to fair value		—			—			1,282			—			1,282
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary		(138	)		—			—			—			(138	)
Impairment of assets held for sale		391			—			—			—			391
Change in embedded derivative mark to fair value		—			—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Non-cash environmental, restructuring and other charges		(5,107	)		(68	)		(2,100	)		—			(7,275	)
Impairment of goodwill / assets held for sale		390			44,000			—			—			44,390
Stock compensation expense		1,124			—			—			—			1,124
Non-cash environmental, restructuring and other charges		(34,698	)		(62	)		2,916			—			(31,844	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(12,203	)		—			—			12,203			—
Stock compensation expense		1,542			—			—			—			1,542
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		18,093			550			(40,513	)		—			(21,870	)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries		17,750			—			—			(17,750	)		—
Net cash from continuing operating activities		(3,889	)		2,894			(29,438	)		—			(30,433	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		75,789			(1,475	)		(89,357	)		—			(15,043	)
Net cash from discontinued operating activities		(10,491	)		—			—			—			(10,491	)
Net cash from continuing operating activities		40,422			(7,562	)		(61,017	)		—			(28,157	)
Net cash from operating activities		(14,380	)		2,894			(29,438	)		—			(40,924	)
Net cash from discontinued operating activities		(10,090	)		—			—			—			(10,090	)
Net cash from operating activities		30,332			(7,562	)		(61,017	)		—			(38,247	)
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment		~~(955~~5,142	)		(~~409~~1,072	)		(17,~~373~~194	)		—			(23,~~737~~124	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		57,~~416~~006			—			—(566	)		—			56,~~416~~440
Proceeds from sale of interest in Chinese subsidiary		—19,419			—			~~9,500~~—			—			919,~~500~~419
Change in restricted cash		(48,~~788~~095	)		—			~~(43~~20	)		—			(48,~~831~~075	)
Net cash from continuing investing activities		~~(327~~23,472	)		(~~409~~1,072	)		8(7,~~084~~740	)		—			714,~~348~~660
Net cash from discontinued investing activities		2262,~~201~~163			—			—			—			2262,~~201~~163
Net cash from investing activities		2185,~~874~~635			(~~409~~1,072	)		8(7,~~084~~740	)		—			2976,~~549~~823
Financing Activities
Financing fees and expenses paid		(1,~~560~~918	)		—			(153	)		—			(12,~~713~~071	)
Payments under revolving credit facilities and other debt		—			—			(~~676~~366	)		—			(~~676~~366	)
Borrowings from revolving credit facilities and other debt		—			—			~~158~~127			—			~~158~~127
Issuance of preferred stock		14,194			—			—			—			14,194
Purchase or repayment of senior notes		(3697,~~347~~661	)		—			—			—			(3697,~~347~~661	)
Payment of dividends		(2,042	)		—			—			—			(2,042	)
Intercompany dividends		1952,~~644~~249			—			(1952,~~644~~249	)		—			—
Intercompany borrowings (payments)		(4174,~~047~~446	)		(28,~~485~~634	)		4365,~~532~~812			—			—
Net cash from continuing financing activities		(47109,~~158~~624	)		(28,~~485~~634	)		2313,~~217~~171			—			(2687,~~426~~819	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		15(38,~~646~~566	)		—			~~(14~~37,~~785~~317	)		—			~~861~~(1,249	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(2432,~~018~~223	)		—			(1218,~~922~~269	)		—			(3650,~~940~~492	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		37,981			—			25,322			—			63,303
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	135,~~963~~758		$	—		$	127,~~400~~053		$	—		$	2612,~~363~~811

(20) Related Party Transactions

On February 16, 2007, the Company closed the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with The Alpine Group (“Alpine”) and Plainfield Asset Management LLC (“Plainfield”) providing for the issuance and sale of 50,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, at a price of $1,000 per share, for a total purchase price of $50.0 million. Following the completion of our common stock rights offering, Alpine purchased an additional 4,494 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on January 25, 2008 for $4.5 million in order to maintain the fully diluted ownership by Alpine and Plainfield in Wolverine at 55.0%. The 54,494 shares are convertible into 49.5 million shares of common stock. On March 20, 2008 Alpine purchased 10,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which have substantially the same terms and conditions as the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock except that the initial dividend rate ~~of interest~~ on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is 8.5%, ~~and~~subject ~~could increase~~ to ~~10.5% if the~~ ~~underlying~~adjustment ~~shares~~as ofdescribed ~~common~~in ~~stock~~Part ~~into~~I, ~~which~~Item ~~the~~2, ~~Series~~Management’s BDiscussion ~~Convertible~~and ~~Preferred~~Analysis ~~Stock~~of ~~can~~Financial beCondition ~~converted~~and ~~are~~Results ~~not~~of ~~successfully~~Operations, ~~registered for resale~~below. The 10,000 shares ~~were~~are convertible ~~issued~~into at9.1 ~~the~~million $1shares of common stock.10 ~~conversion~~Both ~~price~~the Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are ~~convertible~~mandatorily ~~into~~redeemable 9.at $1,000 per ~~million~~share ~~shares~~upon the earlier of ~~stock~~an involuntary change of control or January 31, 2017.

The Company and ~~The~~ Alpine ~~Group, Inc. (“Alpine”)~~ entered into a management agreement at the initial closing of the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement in February 2007, pursuant to which Alpine agreed to provide the Company with certain services for a two-year period in exchange for an annual fee of $1.25 million and reimbursement of reasonable and customary expenses incurred by Alpine. Since the conclusion of the two-year period, Wolverine has continued to utilize the Alpine management services on a month-to-month basis at the same monthly fee rate. For the three and nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 ~~and June 29, 2008~~ we paid $0.34 million and $01.60 million, respectively, to Alpine for these services.

On April 30, 2007, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Keith Weil, the Company’s former Senior Vice President, International and Strategic Development, which was effective as of February 19, 2007, whereby Mr. Weil agreed to provide consulting and advisory services to the Company. The consulting agreement terminated in January 2009. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, we paid Mr. Weil $22.0 thousand in January 2009 in consulting fees. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008, we paid Mr. Weil $66.1 thousand and $~~147~~213.78 thousand, respectively, in consulting fees.

Effective as of January 1, 2008, we entered into a sole source purchasing agreement with Exeon, Inc. (“Exeon”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Alpine, whereby under the agreement we purchase all of our scrap and cathode copper requirements for our Shawnee, Oklahoma and London, Ontario facilities. Under the agreement, we will purchase copper scrap and cathode at substantially the same prices paid prior to entering into the agreement, but with enhanced terms thus improving our working capital usage. Moreover, we believe consolidating our purchases in this manner is more efficient and provides more opportunities to purchase materials from secondary markets since Exeon has been in the scrap reclamation business for a number of years. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we we purchased 10.89 million and 2435.54 million pounds, respectively, of copper ~~cathode~~ cathode and scrap from Exeon at the COMEX current month average price, ~~representing~~ 75representing 77.87% and 8079.35%, respectively, of our North American copper purchases for the periods. Fees charged for the services provided for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 were $0.1 million and $0.2 3 million, respectively. These fees approximate our cost to perform the same ~~services~~ services in-house. As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we had $26.87 million payable to Exeon for these purchases. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008, we purchased 21 15.63 million and 4864.70 million pounds, respectively, of copper cathode and scrap from Exeon at the COMEX current month average price, representing 6675.23% and 71 72.65%, respectively, of our North American copper purchases for the periods. Fees charged for the services provided for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008 were $0.1 million and $0.34 million, respectively. These fees approximate our cost to perform the same services in-house. We had no outstanding payable to Exeon for these purchases for the period ended ~~June~~September 2928, ~~2009~~2008.

(21) Fair Value Measurements

~~On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157,~~ Fair ~~Value Measurements~~ ~~(“SFAS 157”), for fair~~ value measurements of financial assets and financial liabilities and ~~for~~ fair value measurements of nonfinancial items ~~that are~~ recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements are reported based on ~~a recurring~~ASC ~~basis.~~820, ~~SFAS~~“Fair ~~157~~Value Measurements and Disclosures”. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly ~~transaction~~ transaction between market participants at the measurement date., ~~SFAS~~and ~~157~~ also provides ~~establishes~~ a framework for measuring fair value and ~~expands~~expanded disclosures about ~~fair value~~ measurements. FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, delays the effective date of SFAS 157 until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value ~~in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis~~measurements.

~~Currently~~The ~~the~~ Company ismeasures ~~only measuring~~ its derivative assets and liabilities at fair value. Asand ~~required by SFAS 157, the Company~~ has categorized its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair-value hierarchy ~~established in SFAS 157~~ prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels as follows:

• Level 1 – Observable inputs – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the Company, level ~~1 financial assets and liabilities consist of commodity derivative contracts;~~

~~• Level 2~~ 1 –financial ~~Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical~~ assets and liabilities –consist ~~includes quoted prices~~of ~~for~~commodity ~~similar instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar~~derivative ~~instruments in inactive markets, and amounts derived from valuation models where all significant inputs are observable in active markets~~contracts; ~~and~~

• Level 3 2 – ~~Unobservable~~Observable inputs –other ~~includes~~than ~~amounts~~the ~~derived~~quoted ~~from~~prices ~~valuation~~in ~~models~~active ~~where one~~markets orfor ~~more significant inputs are~~identical ~~unobservable~~assets and ~~require~~liabilities us– ~~to develop relevant assumptions.~~includes

~~The~~ quoted ~~following~~prices ~~table~~for ~~presents~~similar ~~the~~instruments, ~~Company’s~~quoted ~~fair~~prices ~~value hierarchy~~ for ~~those~~identical ~~assets~~or ~~and~~similar ~~liabilities~~instruments ~~measured~~in atinactive ~~fair value on a recurring basis as of July 5~~markets, ~~2009~~ and ~~December~~ ~~31, 2009:~~amounts

derived from valuation models where all significant inputs are observable in active markets; and

• Level 3 – Unobservable inputs – includes amounts derived from valuation models where one or more significant inputs

are unobservable and require us to develop relevant assumptions.

The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 4, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	July 5, 2009										December 31, 2008
	October 4, 2009										December 31, 2008
($s in millions)	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total			Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Derivative assets	$	01.90		$	—	$	—	$	01.90		$	0.3		$	—	$	—	$	0.3
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	(2.37	)	$	—	$	—	$	(2.37	)	$	(5.4	)	$	—	$	—	$	(5.4	)

On July 5, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (FSP FAS 107-1), Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 amended Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim as well as in annual financial statements.

We use the following methods in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable: The carrying amount reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these assets approximates their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Secured revolving credit facility and long-term debt: The carrying amount of our borrowings under our ~~15%~~secured ~~Senior~~revolving ~~Secured~~credit ~~Notes~~facilities ~~and other debt~~ approximates fair value. The fair ~~value~~ value of our ~~10.5%~~ Senior Notes, isother long term debt, and any derivative financial instruments are based upon ~~quoted~~ market prices.

Derivatives: The fair value of our foreign currency and commodity derivative financial instruments are determined by reference to market prices.

The following table summarizes fair value information for our financial instruments:

	July 5, 2009				December 31, 2008
	October 4, 2009				December 31, 2008
(In thousands)	Carrying value		Fair Value		Carrying value		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2423,~~462~~434	$	2423,~~462~~434	$	33,537	$	33,537
Restricted cash	$	98,~~239~~046	$	98,~~239~~046	$	37,738	$	37,738
Accounts receivable	$	4544,~~647~~667	$	4544,~~647~~667	$	38,626	$	38,626
Accounts payable	$	31,~~262~~467	$	31,~~262~~467	$	34,713	$	34,713
Senior Notes	$	~~122~~124,~~723~~210	$	~~122~~101,~~723~~820	$	137,656	$	115,629
Other debt	$	~~1,411~~8	$	~~1,411~~8	$	14	$	14

(22) Derivatives

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into various types of transactions involving financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. These transactions are entered into in accordance with our Wolverine Tube, Inc. Derivative Management Policy, which outlines our policy regarding the types of derivatives permitted, the purpose of entering such derivatives, operating and trading limitations and approvals necessary for entering into them. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company has determined its hedge programs to be highly effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows generated by the items hedged.

Commodity Price Risk

For the majority of our customers, the price they pay for a product includes a metal charge that represents the previous monthly average COMEX price for metal. For certain other customers, the metal charge represents the market value of the copper used in that product as of the date we ship the product to the customer. Our prior month average COMEX pricing model is expected to serve as a natural hedge against changes in the commodity price of copper, and allows us to better match the cost of copper with the selling price to our customers. However, as an accommodation to our customers, we often enter into fixed price commitments to purchase copper on their behalf in order to fix the price of copper in advance of shipment. We account for these transactions as cash flow hedges under ~~Statement~~ ~~of Financial Accounting Standard, Accounting for Derivative~~ASC ~~Instruments and Hedging Activities~~815, ~~as amended by SFAS 138, Accounting for Certain~~ “Derivative ~~Instruments~~ and ~~Certain~~ Hedging ~~Activities~~”, and ~~by SFAS 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “SFAS 133”). In addition,~~ beginning the first quarter of 2009, we have ~~adopted~~ ~~SFAS~~provided ~~161, Disclosures~~the ~~about~~additional ~~Derivative~~disclosures ~~Instruments~~required ~~and~~by ~~Hedging~~the ~~Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No~~standard. ~~133.~~ The Company assesses the effectiveness of the hedges on a monthly basis.

The fair values of these derivatives are recognized in derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net change in the derivative asset and liability and the underlying amounts are recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) and reclassified to cost of goods sold when the related inventory is sold. Amounts held in OCI are reclassified to earnings at the point the customer commitments are realized. As of October 4, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives:

The fair values of these derivatives are recognized in derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net change in the derivative asset and liability and the underlying amounts are recognized in OCI and reclassified to cost of goods sold when the related inventory is sold. Amounts held in OCI are reclassified to earnings at the point the customer commitments are realized. As of July 5, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives:

		Volume
Commodity		(net purchase and (sale) contracts)
Copper		1.5 million pounds

		Volume
Commodity		(net purchase and (sale) contracts)
Copper		4.1 million pounds

We have firm-price purchase commitments with some of our copper suppliers under which we agree to buy copper at a price set in advance of the actual delivery of that copper to us. Under these arrangements, we assume the risk of a price decrease in the market price of copper between the time the price is fixed and the time the copper is delivered. In order to reduce our market exposure to price changes, at the time we enter into a firm-price purchase commitment, we also often enter into commodity forward contracts to sell a like amount of copper at the then-current price for delivery to the counterparty at a later date. We account for these transactions as cash flow hedges under ASC 815, “Derivative and Hedging”. The fair values of these derivatives are recognized in derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net change in the derivative asset and liability and the underlying amounts are recognized in OCI and reclassified to cost of goods sold when the related inventory is sold. Amounts held in OCI are reclassified to earnings at the point the customer commitments are realized. As of October 4, 2009, the Company had no outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives.

We have ~~firm-price~~entered ~~purchase~~into ~~commitments~~commodity ~~with~~forward ~~some~~contracts ~~of our copper suppliers under which we agree~~ to ~~buy~~sell copper ~~at a price set~~ in ~~advance~~order ~~of the actual delivery of that copper~~ to ~~us.~~hedge ~~Under these arrangements, we assume the risk of a price decrease~~or inprotect the ~~market~~value ~~price~~ of ~~copper between~~ the ~~time the price is fixed and the time the~~ copper iscarried ~~delivered.~~in ~~In order to reduce~~ our ~~market~~inventory ~~exposure~~from to price ~~changes,~~ at the time we enter into a firm-price purchase commitment, we also often enter into commodity forward contracts to sell a like amount of copper at the then-current price for delivery to the counterparty at a later datedecreases. We We account for these ~~transactions~~forward contracts as ~~cash~~fair ~~flow~~value hedges under ~~SFAS~~ASC 815, ~~133~~“Derivative and Hedging”. The fair ~~values~~value of these derivatives ~~are~~is recognized in ~~derivative~~ derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net change in the derivative asset and ~~liability~~liabilities and the underlying hedged amounts are recognized in ~~OCI~~the ~~and~~Condensed ~~reclassified~~Consolidated toStatements ~~cost~~ of ~~goods sold~~Operations ~~when~~under ~~the~~cost ~~related~~of ~~inventory~~goods is sold. ~~Amounts~~ ~~held in OCI are reclassified to earnings at the point the customer commitments are realized.~~ As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, the Company had nothe ~~outstanding~~following outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives.:

We have entered into commodity forward contracts to sell copper in order to hedge or protect the value of the copper carried in our inventory from price decreases. We account for these forward contracts as fair value hedges under SFAS 133. The fair value of these derivatives is recognized in derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net change in the derivative asset and liabilities and the underlying hedged amounts are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations under cost of goods sold. As of July 5, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives:

		Volume
Commodity		(net purchase and (sale) contracts)
Copper		(1.2) million pounds

In February 2009 we terminated our silver consignment arrangement and purchased our silver on the open market. Consequently, we must purchase and hold our silver in inventory. We have entered into commodity forward contracts to sell silver in order to hedge or protect the value of the silver carried in our inventory from future price decreases. We account for these forward contracts as fair value hedges under ~~SFAS~~ASC ~~133~~815, “Derivative and Hedging”. The fair value of these derivatives is recognized in derivative assets and derivative liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net change in the derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the underlying hedged amounts are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations under cost of goods sold. As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives:

		Volume
Commodity		(net purchase and (sale) contracts)
Silver		(~~766~~611,159) troy ounces

The Company utilizes futures contract positions for tin, nickel, zinc and copper to protect the risk of an overall change in the fair value of theses inventories. Since these derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments under ~~SFAS~~ASC ~~No.~~815, ~~133~~“Derivative and Hedgin”g, the changes in the fair value of these hedges are recognized immediately in cost of goods sold. As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding commodity contracts related to these derivatives:

		Volume
Commodity		(net purchase and (sale) contracts)
Tin		(4477,~~093~~162) pounds
Nickel		(6652,~~139~~911) pounds

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We are subject to market risk exposure from fluctuations in foreign currencies. Foreign currency exchange forward contracts may be used from time to time to hedge the variability in cash flows from the forecasted payment or receipt of currencies other than the functional currency. These forward currency exchange contracts and the underlying hedged receivables and payables are carried at their fair values, with any associated gains and losses recognized in current period earnings. These contracts cover periods commensurate with known or expected exposures, generally within three months. As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we had forward exchange contracts outstanding to sell Euros and British Pounds with a notional amount of $1.60 million. The estimated fair value of these forward exchange contracts to sell foreign currency was a ~~loss~~gain of $734.0 thousand. The effect of a 10% adverse change in exchange rates would ~~reduce~~increase the fair value by approximately $1257.97 thousand.

The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments as of ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~December~~ December 31, 2008 were as follows:

	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
($s in millions)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~July~~Ocotber 54, 2009
Derivatives designated as hedging	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
instruments	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	Derivative Asset	$	0.5	Derivative Liability	$	(0.62	)
Copper - Base Inventory	Derivative Asset		0.45	Derivative Liability		(1.0.3	)
Silver - Base Inventory	Derivative Asset		—	Derivative Liability		(02.51	)
Total derivatives designated as
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	1.0		$	(2.6	)
hedging instruments		$	0.9		$	(2.1	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
instruments	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Commodity Contracts
Commodity Contracts:
Nickel	Derivative Asset	$	—	Derivative Liability	$	(0.1	)
Copper	Derivative Asset		—	Derivative Liability		(0.1	)
Total derivatives not designated as
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	—		$	(0.1	)
hedging instruments		$	—		$	(0.2	)
Total Derivatives		$	1.0		$	(2.7	)
Total Derivatives		$	0.9		$	(2.3	)

	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
($s in millions)	December 31, 2008			December 31, 2008
Derivatives designated as hedging	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
instruments	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	Derivative Asset	$	—	Derivative Liability	$	(4.9	)
Copper - Base Inventory	Derivative Asset		0.2	Derivative Liability		(0.1	)
Total derivatives designated as
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	0.2		$	(5.0	)
hedging instruments		$	0.2		$	(5.0	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
instruments	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Commodity Contracts
Commodity Contracts:
Nickel	Derivative Asset	$	—	Derivative Liability	$	(0.1	)
Tin	Derivative Asset		0.1	Derivative Liability		—
Copper	Derivative Asset		—	Derivative Liability		(0.3	)
Total derivatives not designated as
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	0.1		$	(0.4	)
hedging instruments		$	0.1		$	(0.4	)
Total Derivatives		$	0.3		$	(5.4	)

The effect of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008 were as follows:

Cash Flow Hedges

($s in millions)	Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion)							Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from Accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion)
								Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from
	Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on							Accumulated OCI into earnings (effective
($s in millions)	derivative (effective portion)							portion)
							Location of gain or (loss)
							reclassified from
Derivatives in cash-flow							Accumulated OCI into	Three months ended			Three months ended
Derivatives in cash-flow hedging							Accumulated OCI into	Three months ended			Three months ended
hedging relationships	July 5, 2009 *			June 29, 2008			earnings (effective portion)	July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008
relationships	October 4, 2009 *			September 28, 2008			earnings (effective portion)	October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	$	(0.24	)	$	—(0.5	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(0.53	)	$	—
Copper - Future Receipts		—			0.1		Cost of goods sold		—			(0.73	)
Total	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.14	)		$	(0.53	)	$	(0.73	)

*The company expects to recognize these amounts into earnings over the next 12 months.

		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
		on derivative (ineffective portion and amount
($s in millions)		excluded from effectiveness testing)
	Location of gain or (loss) recognized
	in earnings on derivative (ineffective
Derivatives in cash-flow	portion and amount excluded from	Three months ended			Three months ended
hedging relationships	effectiveness testing)	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(0.21	)	$	0.21
Total		$	(0.21	)	$	0.21

								Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from
	Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on							Accumulated OCI into earnings (effective
($s in millions)	derivative (effective portion)							portion)
							Location of gain or (loss)
							reclassified from
Derivatives in cash-flow							Accumulated OCI into	Six months ended			Six months ended
Derivatives in cash-flow hedging							Accumulated OCI into	Nine months ended			Nine months ended
hedging relationships	July 5, 2009 *			June 29, 2008			earnings (effective portion)	July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008
relationships	October 4, 2009 *			September 28, 2008			earnings (effective portion)	October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	$	(0.24	)	$	—(0.5	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(1.74	)	$	0.4
Copper - Future Receipts		—			0.1		Cost of goods sold		—			(1.30	)
Total	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.14	)		$	(1.74	)	$	(0.96	)

		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
		on derivative (ineffective portion and amount
($s in millions)		excluded from effectiveness testing)
	Location of gain or (loss) recognized
	in earnings on derivative (ineffective
Derivatives in cash-flow	portion and amount excluded from	Six months ended			Six months ended
hedging relationships	effectiveness testing)	July 5, 2009			June 29, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(0.5	)	$	—
Total		$	(0.5	)	$	—

*The company expects to recognize these amounts into earnings over the next 12 months.

		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
		on derivative (ineffective portion and amount
($s in millions)		excluded from effectiveness testing)

	Location of gain or (loss) recognized
	in earnings on derivative (ineffective
Derivatives in cash-flow	portion and amount excluded from	Nine months ended			Nine months ended
hedging relationships	effectiveness testing)	October 4, 2009			September 28, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Customer Contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(0.6	)	$	0.1
Total		$	(0.6	)	$	0.1

Fair Value Hedges

								Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings						on derivative (ineffective portion and amount
($s in millions)		on derivative						excluded from effectiveness testing)
	Location of gain or (loss)
Derivatives in fair value	recognized in earnings on	Three months ended			Three months ended			Three months ended			Three months ended
hedging relationships	derivative	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Base Inventory	Cost of goods sold	$	(01.73	)	$	(10.53	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.21	)
Silver - Base Inventory	Cost of goods sold		1.0			0.1			(0.1	)		0.2
Silver – Base Inventory	Cost of goods sold		(0.7	)		1.0			0.2			0.1
Total		$	0(2.30	)	$	(10.47	)	$	—		$	—0.2

								Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings						on derivative (ineffective portion and amount
($s in millions)		on derivative						excluded from effectiveness testing)
	Location of gain or (loss)
Derivatives in fair value	recognized in earnings on	~~Six~~Nine months ended			~~Six~~Nine months ended			~~Six~~Nine months ended			~~Six~~Nine months ended
hedging relationships	derivative	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008			~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Copper - Base Inventory	Cost of goods sold	$	(01.69	)	$	(1.69	)	$	(0.1	)	$	0.23
Silver - Base Inventory	Cost of goods sold		1.0			0.2			—			0.2
Silver – Base Inventory	Cost of goods sold		0.3			1.2			0.2			0.3
Total		$	0(1.46	)	$	(10.47	)	$	0.1		$	0.46

Non Designated Hedges

		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
($'s in millions)		on derivative
($s in millions)		on derivative
	Location of gain or (loss)
Derivatives not designated as	recognized in earnings on	Three months ended			Three months ended
hedging instruments	derivative	~~July~~October 54, 2009			~~June~~September 2928, 2008
Commodity Contracts:
Nickel	Cost of goods sold	$	(0.1	)	$	0.21
Tin	Cost of goods sold		~~(0.1~~—	)		(0.31	)
Copper	Cost of goods sold		(0.21	)		—
Total		$	(0.42	)	$	(0.12	)

		Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in earnings
($'s in millions)		on derivative</fon t>
($s in millions)		on derivative
	Location of gain or (loss)
Derivatives not designated as	recognized in earnings on	~~Six~~Nine months ended			~~Six~~Nine months ended ~~June~~
hedging instruments	derivative	~~July~~October 54, 2009			September 28, 2008	~~29, 2008~~
Commodity Contracts:
Nickel	Cost of goods sold	$	(0.12	)	$	0.23
Tin	Cost of goods sold		—			(0.32	)
Copper	Cost of goods sold		(0.34	)		—
Total		$	(0.46	)	$	(0.1	)

Material Limitations

The disclosures with respect to the above noted risks do not take into account the underlying commitments or anticipated transactions. If the underlying items were included in the analysis, the gains or losses on the futures contracts may be offset. Actual results will be determined by a number of factors that are not generally under our control and could vary significantly from those factors disclosed.

We are exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties on the above instruments, as well as credit or performance risk with respect to our hedged customers’ commitments. Although nonperformance is possible, we do not anticipate nonperformance by any of these parties.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to current or historical fact, but address events or developments that we anticipate will occur in the future. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our goals, beliefs, plans or current expectations, taking into account the information currently available to our management. When we use words such as “anticipate”, “intend”, “expect,”, “believe”, “plan”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcome, we are making forward-looking statements. Statements relating to future sales, earnings, operating performance, restructuring strategies, capital expenditures and sources and uses of cash, for example, are forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revision of any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events and circumstances occurring after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Information concerning risk factors is contained under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this report. You should carefully consider all of the risks and all other information contained in or incorporated by reference in this report and in our filings with the SEC. These risks are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or which we currently consider immaterial, also may adversely affect us. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Company Overview

Wolverine Tube, Inc. is a global manufacturer and distributor of copper and copper alloy tube, fabricated products, and metal joining products. We currently operate our seven facilities in the United States, Mexico, China, and Portugal. We also have distribution operations in the Netherlands and the United States. Our focus is on custom-engineered, higher value-added tubular products, including fabricated copper components and metal joining products, which enhance performance and energy efficiency in many applications, including: commercial and residential heating, ventilation and air conditioning, refrigeration, home appliances, industrial equipment, power generation, petrochemicals, and chemical processing. We believe that we have the broadest product offering of packaged solutions and cross selling opportunities.

Prior to the decision to sell Wolverine Tube Canada Inc. (“WTCI”), the Company operated in two business segments: Commercial Products and Wholesale Products. Commercial Products consist primarily of high value added products sold directly to original equipment manufacturers and include technical, industrial, and copper alloy tubes, fabricated products, and metal joining products. The Commercial Products segment includes manufacturing plants in the United States, Mexico, and Portugal and distribution centers in the Netherlands and the United States. Wholesale Products were commodity-type plumbing and refrigeration tube products, which were primarily sold to plumbing wholesalers and distributors. With the sale of our London, Ontario business in July 2008, which primarily produced wholesale products, and the discontinuance of the production of wholesale operations at our Decatur, Alabama facility in December of 2007, the wholesale products segment has been eliminated.

Recapitalization Plan

On February 1, 2007, we announced a recapitalization plan which provided significant equity proceeds to Wolverine. We completed the first phase of this recapitalization plan, a private placement of 50,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, for $50.0 million, purchased by The Alpine Group, Inc. (“Alpine”) and a fund managed by Plainfield Asset Management LLC (“Plainfield”) on February 16, 2007, pursuant to a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to our recapitalization plan, in August 2007, we commenced a common stock rights offering which closed on October 29, 2007. Our stockholders purchased 25,444,592 shares of common stock in the rights offering, resulting in gross proceeds of $28.0 million. Additionally, under the terms of the call option described in the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, Alpine purchased an additional 4,494 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on January 25, 2008 for $4.5 million in order to maintain the fully diluted ownership by Alpine and Plainfield in Wolverine at 55.0%.

We also pursued a financial restructuring plan with respect to our 10.5% and 7.375% Senior Notes, our secured revolving credit facility and our receivables sale facility. In light of market conditions which negatively affected our ability to execute such a comprehensive refinancing strategy, during 2008, we took certain actions to be in a position to retire the 7.375% Senior Notes on their maturity date of August 1, 2008. We extended the maturity of our secured revolving credit facility and our receivables sale facility to February 19, 2009. In February 2008, we sold substantially all of the assets of our STP business for net proceeds of $22.1 million plus a working capital payment to us of approximately $2.8 million. In March 2008 we sold 30.0% of our WTS subsidiary for $9.5 million. On March 20, 2008, Plainfield refinanced $38.3 million of the 7.375% Senior Notes held by it by exchanging them for 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes due March 28, 2009 and Alpine purchased 10,000 shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for $10.0 million, under terms substantially similar to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. On April 21, 2008 we sold our Booneville, Mississippi facility which was closed in January 2008, for $1.4 million. In July 2008, we sold our London, Ontario wholesale and commercial tube business for net proceeds of approximately $41.2 million. These actions provided the liquidity required to repurchase or repay the outstanding 7.375% Senior Notes on or before their maturity in August 2008. On February 29, 2008, we repurchased $12.0 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes at a discount below the face value of the notes, and on April 8, 2008 we repurchased an additional $25.0 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes, also at a discount below the face value of the notes, leaving $61.4 million in face amount of our 7.375% Senior Notes, which we paid at maturity on August 1, 2008. On September 15, 2008 we sold an additional 20% of our WTS subsidiary, raising $10.1 million.

On February 26, 2009, we announced the commencement of an offer (the “Exchange Offer”) to each of the holders of our 10.5% Senior Notes and our 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes due April 1, 2009 and March 28, 2009, respectively, to exchange these notes for new notes in order to refinance those maturities. The Exchange Offer was successfully consummated on April 28, 2009, when we issued $121.6 million aggregate principal amount of our 15% Senior Secured Notes due March 2012 (the “Senior Secured Notes”) pursuant to an indenture, dated as of April 28, 2009, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and collateral agent (the “Indenture”). As security for the performance of our obligations under the Indenture, we entered into a Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2009, with the subsidiary guarantors and the collateral agent. As part of the Exchange Offer, holders of approximately $83.3 million in principal amount of our 10.5% Senior Notes due 2009 and the $38.3 million in principal amount of our 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes due 2009 exchanged such notes for our Senior Secured Notes. As a result of the successful completion of the Exchange Offer, we have approximately $121.6 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes outstanding and all of the 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes due 2009 have been exchanged or retired.

The Senior Secured Notes are secured on a first-priority basis by substantially all of our assets and those of the subsidiary guarantors and will rank pari passu in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of our future subordinated indebtedness, if any. The Guarantee and Collateral Agreement provides for the unconditional guarantee by the subsidiary guarantors of the payment of the principal and interest on the Senior Secured Notes and the performance by us of all other obligations under the Indenture.

The Indenture contains covenants that limit the ability of the Company and our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends or distributions on, or redeem or repurchase capital stock; make investments; issue or sell capital stock of subsidiaries; engage in transactions with affiliates; create liens on assets; transfer or sell assets; guarantee indebtedness; restrict dividends or other payments of subsidiaries; consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets and the assets of its subsidiaries; and engage in sale/leaseback transactions.

Results of Operations

The following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the consolidated operating results of the Company for the three and ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ ~~July~~ended 5October 4, 2009 and ~~June~~September 2928, 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1 above, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Executive Summary

· Net sales for the quarter ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 were $~~113~~118.60 million compared to $~~245~~231.50 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008. The 5348.79% decrease in sales year over year was the result of a 4322.65% decrease in the average COMEX price for copper in 2009 compared to 2008 and the impact of decreasing demand in the appliance markets and in the air conditioning markets, both domestically and internationally.

· The number of pounds shipped decreased to 3230.92 million pounds during the third quarter, a 2931.20% decrease in 2009 from the same period in the previous year reflecting the declining markets due to overall economic uncertainties.

· Gross profit for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 was $43.61 million compared to $78.98 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008;. ~~however,~~Gross ~~gross~~ profit as a percentage of sales ~~increased~~decreased to 42.06% compared to 3.28% for the same quarter of 2008. Gross profit was adversely affected by lower overall volumes, including significantly lower volumes for certain higher value-added products ~~such as technical tube and tube forming products,~~ which historically have higher gross margins. ~~Continued improvements in efficiency and productivity contributed to the overall increase in gross profit percentage of sales.~~

· The net loss applicable to common stockholders for quarter ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 was $1410.57 million compared to a net loss of $1427.71 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008. The 5348.79% decrease in sales, and resulting lower gross margins, ~~and~~were athe ~~$3.6~~major ~~million~~drivers ~~loss~~for onthe ~~extinguishment~~loss ofin ~~debt~~2009. ~~more~~The ~~than~~loss ~~offset improvements~~ in ~~selling,~~2008 ~~general~~included ~~and~~a ~~administrative~~$44.0 ~~(“SG&A”)~~million ~~expenses,~~goodwill ~~restructuring and~~ impairment ~~charges~~adjustment ~~and~~partially ~~interest~~offset ~~expense,~~by ~~net.~~gains ~~The~~from ~~loss~~the insale ~~2008~~of ~~included~~our aMontreal, ~~$5.8~~Quebec ~~million~~facility ~~loss~~and ~~from~~the ~~discontinued~~sale ~~operations~~of ~~resulting~~an ~~from~~equity ~~the~~interest ~~sale~~in ofWolverine ~~our~~Tube ~~Canadian~~Shanghai ~~operations~~(“WTS”).

On February 26, 2009, the Company announced the commencement of an Exchange Offer to each of the holders of its 10.5% Senior Notes and its 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes due 2009 for new notes due 2012. On April 28, 2009, the Company successfully completed the Exchange Offer with respect to $83.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 10.5% Senior Notes, representing 84% of the outstanding 10.5% Senior Notes of $99.4 million. Including the $38.3 million in principal amount of the 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes, holders of $121.6 million, or 88%, of the Company’s $137.7 million 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes agreed to exchange their notes for the 15% Senior Secured Notes due 2012. The Company redeemed $16.1 million of the 10.5% Senior Notes and paid a 3% exchange fee to holders of the 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes that exchanged their notes for the 15% Senior Secured Notes.

For the Three Months Ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009, Compared with the Three Months Ended ~~June~~ 29September 28, 2008:

For the three months ended

Increase

% Increase

(In thousands, except for percentages)

~~July~~October 54, 2009

~~June~~September 2928, 2008

(Decrease)

Total Pounds Shipped

3230,~~877~~155

4643,~~468~~728

(13,~~591~~573

)

(2931.20

Total pounds shipped ~~decrease~~decreased by 2931.20% in 2009 compared to the same quarter of 2008 due to overall economic uncertainties, lower demand in domestic and international air conditioning markets and decreased demand in domestic appliance markets.

For the three months ended

Increase

% Increase

(In thousands, except for percentages)

~~July~~October 54, 2009

~~June~~September 2928, 2008

(Decrease)

Net Sales

~~113~~117,~~580~~962

~~245~~231,~~511~~048

(~~131~~113,~~931~~086

)

(5348.79

The 5348.79% decrease in net sales for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 as compared to the same quarter of 2008 resulted from the 2931.20% decrease in pounds shipped, changes in mix reflecting lower volumes of certain higher value-added products ~~such as technical tube and tube forming products~~, and a 4322.65% decrease in the price of copper year over year. As a result of the decrease in copper prices and changes in product mix, our per unit selling price for the quarter ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 was $3.4691 compared to $5.28 for ~~the~~ the quarter ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008.

For the three months ended

Increase

% Increase

(In thousands, except for percentages)

~~July~~October 54, 2009

~~June~~September 2928, 2008

(Decrease)

Gross Profit

43,~~582~~107

78,~~942~~799

(35,~~360~~692

)

(4264.37

Gross profit was adversely affected by overall lower volumes due to decreased demands for air conditioning and appliance products which lowered our volume at several locations and the negative impact on gross profit from lower volumes on higher value-added products.

~~Gross~~Selling, ~~profit~~general ~~was~~and ~~adversely~~administrative ~~affected~~expenses byof ~~overall~~$5.5 ~~lower~~million ~~volumes~~for ~~due~~the toquarter ~~decreased demands~~ended ~~for~~October ~~air~~4, ~~conditioning~~2009 ~~and~~were ~~appliance~~$0.2 ~~products~~million ~~which~~less ~~lowered~~than ~~our volume at several locations and~~ the ~~negative~~quarter ~~impact~~ended onSeptember ~~gross profit from lower volumes on higher~~28, ~~value-added products~~2008. Continued ~~improvements~~reductions in ~~manufacturing~~the ~~efficiency~~corporate general and ~~productivity~~ administration burden contributed to the ~~overall~~decrease ~~increase~~ in ~~gross~~expenses ~~profit~~for asthe athird ~~percentage of~~quarter ~~sales~~of 2009.

~~Selling,~~Net gain ~~general~~on ~~and~~divestitures ~~administrative~~recorded ~~expenses~~in ofthe ~~$6.9~~third ~~million~~quarter ~~for~~of ~~the~~2008 ~~quarter~~of ~~ended~~$21.7 ~~July~~million reflects 5,gains ~~2009~~of ~~were~~ $07.6 million ~~more~~related ~~than~~to the ~~quarter~~sale ~~ended June~~of ~~29, 2008~~a 30. ~~Increased~~0% ~~legal~~equity ~~fees~~interest ofin WTS to The Wieland Group (“Wieland”) and a $114.61 million ~~associated~~gain ~~primarily~~from ~~with our~~the ~~recent~~sale ~~refinancing~~of ~~efforts~~our Montreal, ~~were~~Quebec ~~offset~~facility. No bydivestitures ~~continued~~were ~~reductions~~recorded in the third ~~corporate~~quarter ~~general~~of ~~and administration burden~~2009.

~~Net loss~~Restructuring onand ~~divestitures~~impairment ~~recorded~~charges infor the ~~second~~ quarter ofended ~~2008~~October 4, 2009 of $01.7 million were $1.4 million ~~reflects~~more than the $0.3 million expense for the same quarter of ~~additional~~2008. The ~~expenses~~$1.7 ~~related~~million toexpenses for the ~~sale~~2009 quarter included severance charges of $0.9 million in connection with our continued SG&A restructuring effort, a ~~30.~~$0%.2 ~~indirect~~million ~~equity~~impairment ~~interest~~of ~~in Wolverine~~assets ~~Tube~~at ~~Shanghai~~our ~~(“WTS”)~~Monterrey, Mexico tofacility, ~~The~~$0.4 ~~Wieland~~million ~~Group~~related ~~(“Wieland”)~~to onrealigning ~~March~~operations 14at our Monterrey, ~~2008~~Mexico facility, and $0. No2 ~~divestitures~~million ~~were~~related ~~recorded~~to previously closed facilities. The restructuring expenses of $0.3 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 related ~~2009~~primarily to the actions at our Decatur, Alabama and Booneville, Mississippi facilities.

~~Restructuring~~Net ~~and~~interest ~~impairment~~expense ~~charges~~ for the quarter ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 ofwas $04.74 million ~~were~~compared ~~$0.4~~to ~~million~~interest ~~less~~expense ~~than~~of ~~the~~ $14.10 million ~~expense~~ for the ~~same~~third quarter of 2008. ~~The~~Interest ~~$0.7~~expense ~~million~~on ~~expenses~~our ~~for~~Senior ~~the~~Notes ~~2009~~increased ~~quarter~~by ~~included~~ $0.2 million due ~~associated~~to ~~with~~ the ~~closure~~10.5% ofSenior ~~our~~Notes ~~Booneville, Mississippi facility~~ and ~~the~~ ~~significant downsizing of our Decatur, Alabama facility, severance charges of $0~~10.25% ~~million~~Senior inExchange ~~connection~~Notes ~~with~~being ~~our continued SG&A restructuring effort~~exchanged ~~and~~for ~~$0.3~~15% ~~million~~Senior ~~related~~Secured toNotes ~~realigning~~on ~~operations~~April at28, ~~our Monterrey~~2009. Additionally, ~~Mexico~~there ~~facility.~~was Ofa ~~the~~ $10.12 million ~~restructuring~~reduction ~~expenses~~ in ~~the~~interest ~~second~~income ~~quarter~~in of2009 versus 2008~~, $0~~.~~3 million~~ ~~related~~During to the ~~actions~~third atquarter ~~our~~of ~~Decatur~~2008, ~~Alabama~~interest ~~and Booneville,~~income ~~Mississippi~~was ~~facilities and the reduction of corporate general and~~generated ~~administration~~from ~~burden,~~funds ~~and $0.8~~invested ~~million~~as ~~related~~a toresult of the ~~closure~~influx of cash from our recapitalization ~~Montreal,~~plan ~~Quebec~~in ~~facility~~2008.

~~Net~~Non-controlling interest ~~expense~~ for the quarter ended ~~July~~September 528, ~~2009~~2008 ~~was $4.5 million compared to interest expense~~ of $40.83 million ~~for~~reflects the earnings ~~second quarter~~ of ~~2008. Interest~~ ~~expense due to~~ the ~~notes increased by $0~~30.~~4 million due to the 10.5~~0% ~~Senior~~equity ~~Notes~~interest ~~and~~in ~~10.5% Senior Exchange Notes being exchanged for 15% Senior Secured Notes on April 28~~WTS, ~~2009. This~~which was ~~offset~~purchased by ~~a $0.1~~Wieland ~~million~~effective ~~reduction~~March ~~in interest income in 2009. During the second quarter of 2008~~14, ~~interest income was generated from funds invested as a result of the influx of cash from our recapitalization plan in~~ 2008.

~~During~~Equity in ~~the~~earnings ~~second quarter~~ of ~~2009,~~unconsolidated wesubsidiary ~~recognized~~for athe ~~$3.6~~quarter ~~million~~ended ~~loss~~October on4, ~~the extinguishment~~2009 of $0.7 ~~debt~~million ~~related~~represents toour ~~the~~50.0% ~~Exchange~~equity ~~Offer~~investment ~~that~~in ~~was~~WTS. ~~successfully completed~~Wieland onpurchased ~~April~~an additional ~~28, 2009~~20. ~~This~~0% ~~loss~~equity ~~represents~~interest ~~the~~in 3%WTS ~~exchange~~on ~~fee that~~September ~~was~~15, ~~paid~~2008, tobringing ~~holders~~their ownership ofinterest ~~the~~to 1050.50%, ~~Senior~~at ~~Notes~~which ~~and~~time ~~10.5%~~we ~~Senior~~began ~~Exchange~~recording our investment in ~~Notes~~WTS ~~that~~using ~~exchanged~~the ~~their~~equity ~~notes~~method. Earnings for the ~~15%~~third ~~Senior~~quarter ~~Secured~~of ~~Notes~~2008 were $0.1 million.

~~Non-controlling~~We ~~interest~~recorded a net tax benefit of $0.5 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~October 294, ~~2008~~2009 as compared with a net tax benefit of $0.28 million for the same period in 2008. The tax benefit in 2009 reflects a reduction in U.S. deferred taxes associated with withholding taxes on foreign dividends offset by taxes accrued in foreign entities where we had taxable income for the quarter and an ~~earnings~~increase ofin accruals in Canada. Tax expense in 2008 reflects taxes accrued in foreign entities where we had taxable income for the 30quarter.0% ~~equity~~The ~~interest~~net tax benefit from the pretax loss in ~~WTS,~~the ~~which~~U.S. was ~~purchased~~offset by ~~Wieland~~an increase in our ~~effective~~valuation ~~March~~allowance 14and therefore no other tax expense was recorded during the nine months ended September 28, 2008.

~~Equity in~~Dividends ~~earnings~~accrued ofon ~~unconsolidated~~our ~~subsidiary~~Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were $2.2 million for the quarter ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 ofversus $02.3 0 million ~~represents~~during ~~our~~the quarter 50ended September 28, 2008.0% The ~~equity~~increase ~~investment~~in the dividends was due in ~~WTS.~~part ~~Wieland~~to ~~purchased~~the an additional ~~indirect~~shares ~~20.0%~~of ~~equity~~preferred ~~interest~~stock purchased by Alpine in 2008. ~~WTS~~Dividends on ~~September~~the ~~15,~~preferred ~~2008,~~stock ~~bringing their~~are ~~ownership~~cumulative ~~interest~~at toan 50initial annual rate of 8.0%, atas ~~which~~to ~~time~~the weSeries ~~began~~A ~~recording~~Convertible ~~our investment~~Preferred inStock ~~WTS~~and ~~using~~8.5% as to the ~~equity~~Series B ~~method~~Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to dividend rate adjustments as described below.

We are entitled to defer dividends on the preferred stock to the extent that we do not have cash or financing available to us to cover the full quarterly dividend amount in compliance with our contractual obligations. With respect to the Series A ~~net~~Convertible ~~tax~~Preferred Stock, any deferred dividend will accrue at an ~~expense~~annual rate of $10.0% if the dividend payment date is before January 31, 2012 and at an annual rate of 12.30% ~~million~~per ~~was~~annum ~~recorded~~if inthe ~~2009~~dividend aspayment ~~compared~~date is on or after January 31, 2012. Any deferred dividend with arespect ~~net~~to ~~tax~~the ~~expense~~Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will accrue at an annual rate of $010.85% ~~million~~if inthe ~~2008. Tax~~dividend ~~expense~~payment date inis ~~2009~~before January 31, 2012 and ~~2008~~at ~~reflects~~an ~~taxes~~annual rate of 12.5% per annum if the ~~accrued~~dividend inpayment ~~foreign~~date ~~entities~~is ~~where~~on weor ~~had~~after ~~taxable~~January ~~income~~31, ~~for~~2012. Furthermore, the ~~quarter~~dividend rate on both the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to additional adjustment, as provided below, as long as certain conditions are not satisfied. ~~The~~Due ~~net~~to restrictions on cash available ~~tax~~to ~~expense~~pay ~~from~~preferred ~~pre-tax~~stock ~~income~~dividends inimposed by the Indentures governing our U10.S.5% Senior ~~operations~~Notes ~~required~~and anrecently ~~offsetting~~issued Senior Secured Notes, we have deferred $12.0 ~~decrease~~million in ~~our~~preferred ~~tax~~stock ~~valuation~~dividends ~~reserve~~that ~~and~~accrued ~~therefore~~through nothe ~~tax~~period ~~expense~~ended October ~~was~~4, ~~recorded for~~2009, ~~these~~as ~~operations~~reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in accrued dividends.

~~Dividends~~In onaddition, ~~our~~if at any time after June 16, 2007, with respect to the Series A Convertible ~~and~~Preferred Stock, or June 30, 2008 with respect to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, ~~were~~the ~~$2.2~~shares ~~million~~of common stock into which the applicable series of preferred stock is convertible are not registered for resale under the ~~quarter~~Securities ~~ended~~Act ~~July~~of 51933, ~~2009~~then ~~versus~~the ~~$1.6~~dividend ~~million~~rate ~~during~~on the applicable ~~quarter~~series ~~ended~~of ~~June~~preferred stock will increase by 0.5% for each quarter in 29which this condition remains unsatisfied, ~~2008. The~~up to a maximum increase inof 2.0%. Due to certain restrictions imposed under the ~~dividends~~federal ~~was~~securities ~~due~~laws inupon ~~part~~the amount toof our securities that may be registered for resale by the preferred ~~additional~~stockholders, ~~shares~~as affiliates of ~~preferred~~Wolverine, ~~stock~~we ~~purchased~~continue byto ~~Alpine~~be ~~during~~unable to satisfy the ~~second~~resale ~~six~~condition applicable to both the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ~~months~~and ofSeries ~~2008~~B Convertible Preferred Stock. ~~Dividends~~We do not currently have a registration statement on ~~the~~file ~~preferred~~for ~~stock~~such ~~are~~resale. ~~cumulative~~As ata anresult, ~~initial~~if such resale ~~annual~~condition continues to be unsatisfied, the maximum dividend rate ofon 8the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will rise to 12.0% asprior to January 31, 2012 or 14.0% on or after January 31, 2012 and on the Series AB Convertible Preferred Stock will rise to 12.5% prior to January 31, 2012 and 814.5% ason or after January 31, 2012. As of October 4, 2009, we are accruing dividends at the maximum rate permitted prior to January 31, 2012 on the Series BA Convertible Preferred Stock, at ~~subject~~12.0% toand ~~dividend~~the ~~rate adjustments~~Series asB ~~described~~Convertible ~~below~~Preferred Stock at 12.5%.

We are entitled to defer dividends on the preferred stock to the extent that we do not have cash or financing available to us to cover the full quarterly dividend amount in compliance with our contractual obligations. With respect to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, any deferred dividend will accrue at an annual rate of 10.0% if the dividend payment date is before January 31, 2012 and at an annual rate of 12.0% per annum if the dividend payment date is on or after January 31, 2012. Any deferred dividend with respect to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will accrue at an annual rate of 10.5% if the dividend payment date is before January 31, 2012 and at an annual rate of 12.5% per annum if the dividend payment date is on or after January 31, 2012. Furthermore, the dividend rate on both the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to additional adjustment, as provided below, as long as certain conditions are not satisfied. Due to restrictions on cash available to pay preferred stock dividends imposed by the Indentures governing our 10.5% Senior Notes and recently issued Senior Secured Notes, we have deferred $9.9 million in preferred stock dividends that accrued through the period ended July 5, 2009, as reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in accrued dividends.

~~In addition,~~The ~~if at any time after June 16, 2007, with respect to the Series A~~net ~~Convertible~~loss ~~Preferred~~applicable ~~Stock, or June 30, 2008 with respect~~ to ~~the~~common ~~Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the~~ shares ofin ~~common stock into which~~ the ~~applicable~~ ~~series~~third quarter of ~~preferred~~2009 ~~stock~~was is$10.7 ~~convertible are not registered for~~million, ~~resale~~or ~~under~~a ~~the~~loss ~~Securities Act~~ of ~~1933, then the dividend rate on the applicable series of preferred stock will increase by~~ $0.5%26 ~~for~~per ~~each~~common ~~quarter in which this condition remains unsatisfied~~share, upcompared towith a ~~maximum~~net ~~increase~~loss of 2$27.~~0%.~~1 ~~Due to certain restrictions imposed under the federal securities laws upon the amount of our securities that may be registered for resale by the preferred stockholders~~million, ~~as affiliates of Wolverine, we continue to be unable to~~ ~~satisfy~~or ~~the resale condition applicable to both the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. As~~ a ~~result,~~loss ~~the maximum~~of ~~dividend rate on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock could rise to 12.~~$0~~% prior to January 31, 2012 or 14~~.0%68 onper orcommon ~~after~~share ~~January~~for ~~31, 2012 and on~~ the ~~Series~~ Bthird ~~Convertible~~quarter ~~Preferred Stock could rise to 12.5% prior to January 31, 2012 and 14.5% on or after January 31, 2012. As~~ of ~~July 5, 2009, we are accruing dividends at the maximum rate permitted prior to January 31, 2012 on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at 12~~2008.~~0% and the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at 12.5%.~~

~~The net~~For ~~loss applicable to common shares in~~ the ~~second~~Nine ~~quarter~~Months ofEnded ~~2009~~October ~~was $14.5 million~~4, ~~or a loss of $0.36 per common share~~2009, ~~compared~~Compared with athe ~~net~~Nine ~~loss~~Months ~~of $14.7~~Ended ~~million~~September 28, ~~or a loss of $0.36 per common share for the second quarter of~~ 2008.:

For the Six Months Ended July 5, 2009, Compared with the Six Months Ended June 29, 2008:

	For the nine months ended				Increase			% Increase
(In thousands, except for percentages)	October 4, 2009		September 28, 2008		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Total Pounds Shipped		93,716		130,870		(37,154	)		(28.4	)%

	For the six months ended				Increase			% Increase
(In thousands, except for percentages)	July 5, 2009		June 29, 2008		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Total Pounds Shipped		63,561		87,142		(23,581	)		(27.1	)%

Total pounds shipped decreased by 28.4% in the nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 due to lower demand in domestic and international air conditioning markets and decreased demand in domestic appliance markets.

Total pounds shipped decrease by 27.1% in the first six months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 due to lower demand in domestic and international air conditioning markets and decreased demand in domestic appliance markets.

	For the nine months ended				Increase			% Increase
(In thousands, except for percentages)	October 4, 2009		September 28, 2008		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	341,144	$	678,018	$	(336,874	)		(49.7	)%

	For the six months ended				Increase			% Increase
(In thousands, except for percentages)	July 5, 2009		June 29, 2008		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Net Sales	$	223,182	$	446,970	$	(223,789	)		(50.1	)%

The 49.7% decrease in net sales for the nine months ended October 4, 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008 resulted from the 28.4% decrease in pounds shipped and a 40.8% decrease in the price of copper year over year. As a result of the decrease in copper prices, our per unit selling price for the nine months ended October 4, 2009 was $3.64 compared to $5.18 for the nine months ended September 28, 2008.

The 50.1% decrease in net sales for the six months ended July 5, 2009 as compared to the same period of 2008 resulted from the 27.1% decrease in pounds shipped and a 49.4% decrease in the price of copper year over year. As a result of the decrease in copper prices, our per unit selling price for the six months ended July 5, 2009 was $3.51 compared to $5.13 for the six months ended June 29, 2008.

	For the nine months ended				Increase			% Increase
(In thousands, except for percentages)	October 4, 2009		September 28, 2008		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Gross Profit	$	11,264	$	27,744	$	(16,480	)		(59.4	)%

	For the six months ended				Increase			% Increase
(In thousands, except for percentages)	July 5, 2009		June 29, 2008		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Gross Profit	$	8,157	$	18,945	$	(10,788	)		(56.9	)%

Selling, general and administration expenses of $1218.50 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 were $0.78 million less than the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008, reflecting the continued reductions in the corporate general and ~~administration~~ administration burden offset by increased legal fees associated primarily with our recent refinancing efforts.

Net gain on divestitures recorded in the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months of 2008 of $526.07 million ~~reflects~~ reflects the $12.6 million gain on the sale of a 3050.0% ~~indirect~~ equity interest in ~~Wolverine~~WTS to Weiland ~~Tube~~and ~~Shanghai~~a ~~(“WTS”)~~$14.1 tomillion ~~The~~gain ~~Weiland~~from ~~Group~~the ~~(“Weiland”)~~sale onof ~~March~~our 14Montreal, Quebec ~~2008~~facility. No divestitures were recorded in the same period of 2009.

Restructuring and impairment charges for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 of $13.52 million were $32.62 million less than the same period of 2008. The $13.52 million expense for the ~~six~~nine month period of 2009 included ~~$0.5 million associated with the closure of our Booneville, Mississippi facility and the significant downsizing of our Decatur, Alabama facility,~~ severance charges of $01.~~7 million~~6 million in connection with our continued SG&A restructuring effort, ~~and~~a $0.32 million impairment of assets at our Monterrey, Mexico facility, $0.7 million related to realigning operations at our Monterrey, Mexico facility and $0.7 million associated with previously closed facilities. Restructuring expenses of $5.14 million ~~for~~during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008 included a $0.4 million non-cash write down of the fair value to the sale price of the Booneville, Mississippi assets held for sale, $3.4 7 million related to the Decatur, Alabama and Booneville, Mississippi facilities and the reduction of corporate general and administration burden, and $1.3 million related to the closure of our Jackson, Tennessee and Montreal Quebec manufacturing facilities and the relocation our U.S wholesale warehouse into the Decatur, Alabama facility.

Net interest expense of $812.04 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 ~~decreased~~ decreased by $1.84 million from the $913.8 million for the ~~six~~nine month period of 2008. ~~Bond~~Interest ~~interest~~on our Senior Notes was reduced by $2.32 million due primarily to the 7.375% Senior Notes being paid in August of 2008. This was offset by a $0.58 million reduction in interest income in 2009. During the first ~~six~~ nine months of 2008, interest income was generated from funds invested as a result of the influx of cash from our recapitalization plan in 2008.

~~Non-controlling~~During ~~interest for~~ the ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ending ~~June~~October 294, ~~2008~~2009, ofwe recognized a $0.3.6 million ~~reflects~~loss on the ~~earnings~~extinguishment of debt related to the ~~30.0%~~Exchange ~~equity~~Offer ~~interest~~that inwas ~~WTS~~successfully completed on April 28, ~~which~~2009. This loss represents the 3% exchange fee that was ~~purchased~~paid byto ~~Wieland~~holders of the 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange ~~effective~~Notes ~~March~~that ~~14,~~exchanged ~~2008~~their notes for the 15% Senior Secured Notes.

~~During~~Non-controlling interest for the ~~second~~nine ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~2009~~September 28, we2008 ~~recognized~~of a $30.65 million ~~loss on the~~reflects ~~extinguishment of debt related to~~ the ~~Exchange~~earnings ~~Offer that was successfully completed on April 28, 2009. This loss represents the 3% exchange fee that was paid to holders~~ of the 1030.50% ~~Senior~~equity ~~Notes~~interest ~~and~~in ~~10.5%~~WTS, ~~Senior~~which ~~Exchange Notes~~was ~~that~~purchased ~~exchanged~~by ~~their~~Wieland effective ~~notes~~March ~~for~~14, ~~the 15% Senior Secured Notes~~2008.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 of of $1.3 million compared to $0.71 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2008. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary represents our 50.0% equity investment in WTS. Wieland purchased an additional ~~indirect~~ 20.0% equity interest in WTS on September 15, 2008, bringing their ownership interest to 50.0%, at which time we began recording our investment in WTS using the equity method.

A net tax expense of $0.61 million was recorded in for the ~~first~~nine ~~six~~ months ofended ~~2009~~October as4, 2009 compared ~~with~~to a net tax expense of $1.90 million infor ~~2008. Tax~~the ~~expense in~~nine ~~2009~~months ~~reflects taxes accrued in foreign entities where we had taxable income~~ended ~~for~~September ~~the~~28, ~~period~~2008. Tax expense in ~~2008~~2009 reflects taxes accrued in foreign entities where we had taxable income for the period, ~~and~~an ~~alternative~~increase ~~minimum taxes accrued~~in ~~associated~~accruals ~~with~~in ~~our~~Canada, ~~U.S.~~and ~~consolidated~~a ~~operations. The~~reduction ~~net tax benefit from the pretax loss~~ in ~~the~~ U.S. ~~was~~deferred ~~offset~~taxes byassociated ~~an increase in our valuation~~with ~~allowance~~withholding ~~and~~taxes ~~therefore~~on noforeign ~~other~~dividends. ~~tax~~Tax expense ~~beyond~~in ~~the~~2008 ~~alternative~~reflects ~~minimum tax~~taxes ~~expense~~accrued ~~was~~in ~~recorded~~foreign ~~during~~entities ~~the~~where ~~first~~we ~~six~~had ~~months~~taxable ofincome ~~2008~~for the period.

Dividends accrued on our Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were $46.3 5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009 versus $24.8 million during the nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 2928, 2008. The increase in the dividends was due in part to the additional shares of preferred stock purchased by Alpine during the ~~first six~~nine months ofended September 28, 2008. Dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative at an initial annual rate of 8.0% as to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 8.5% as to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to dividend rate adjustments as described below.

We are entitled to defer dividends on the preferred stock to the extent that we do not have cash or financing available to us to cover the full quarterly dividend amount in compliance with our contractual obligations. With respect to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, any deferred dividend will accrue at an annual rate of 10.0% if the dividend payment date is before January 31, 2012 and at an annual rate of 12.0% per annum if the dividend payment date is on or after January 31, 2012. Any deferred dividend with respect to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will accrue at an annual rate of 10.5% if the dividend payment date is before January 31, 2012 and at an annual rate of 12.5% per annum if the dividend payment date is on or after January 31, 2012. Furthermore, the dividend rate on both the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to additional adjustment, as provided below, as long as certain conditions are not satisfied. Due to restrictions on cash available to pay preferred stock dividends imposed by the Indentures governing our 10.5% Senior Notes and recently issued Senior Secured Notes, we have deferred $912.90 million in preferred stock dividends that accrued through the period ended ~~July~~ 5October 4, 2009, as reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in ~~accrued~~ accrued dividends.

In addition, if at any time after June 16, 2007, with respect to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, or June 30, 2008 with respect to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the shares of common stock into which the applicable series of preferred stock is convertible are not registered for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, then the dividend rate on the applicable series of preferred stock will increase by 0.5% for each quarter in which this condition remains unsatisfied, up to a maximum increase of 2.0%. Due to certain restrictions imposed under the federal securities laws upon the amount of our securities that may be registered for resale by the preferred stockholders, as affiliates of Wolverine, we continue to be unable to ~~satisfy~~ satisfy the resale condition applicable to both the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. We do not currently have a registration statement on file for such resale. As a result, ~~the~~if such resale condition continues to be unsatisfied, the maximum dividend rate on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ~~could~~will rise to 12.0% prior to January 31, 2012 or 14.0% on or after January 31, 2012 and on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock ~~could~~will rise to 12.5% prior to January 31, 2012 and 14.5% on or after January 31, 2012. As of ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we are accruing dividends at the maximum rate permitted prior to January 31, 2012 on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at 12.0% and the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at 12.5%.

The net loss applicable to common shares in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 was $2535.18 million, or a loss of $0.6288 per common share, compared with a net loss of $1340.01 million, or a loss of $01.3300 per common share in for the same period of 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents selected information concerning our financial condition:

(In thousands)	July 5, 2009		December 31, 2008
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	24,462	$	33,537
Working Capital*	$	54,111	$	46,282
Total Debt	$	124,134	$	137,670
Current Ratio*		2.21		1.84

(In thousands)	October 4, 2009		December 31, 2008
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	23,434	$	33,537
Working Capital*	$	53,790	$	46,282
Total Debt	$	124,218	$	137,670
Current Ratio*		2.32		1.84

* Excludes cash, restricted cash and debt

Overview and Outlook

Strategically, our objective is to strengthen and reposition the Company by concentrating on improving its competitiveness, operating performance and customer service, and by becoming a leading ~~global~~ supplier of value added solutions and products in ~~systems~~ systems that require high performance and energy efficient heat transfer and cooling. We paid our 7.375% Senior Notes when they matured on August 1, 2008 and refinanced our 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes on April 28, 2009 through an Exchange Offer as described in Note 8, Financing Arrangements and Debt, in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements inclueded in this Form 10-Q.

We paid our 7.375% Senior Notes when they matured on August 1, 2008 and refinanced our 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes on April 28, 2009 through an Exchange Offer as described in Note 8, Financing Arrangements and Debt, in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q.

See the discussion of risks related to our liquidity under Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and in our Form 10-Q for the period ended April 5, 2009.

Sources of Liquidity

~~During~~Subsequent to the ~~balance~~Exchange ~~of 2009~~Offer, our sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents (approximately $15.0 million of unrestricted domestic cash as of the closing of the Exchange Offer), cash provided by operations and amounts available from our foreign subsidiaries. We do not currently have domestic liquidity facilities in place as they were terminated on the maturity date of February 19, 2009. Future funding requirements with respect to our liquidity requirements could vary from the Company’s current estimates and could affect our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations and sustain our operations which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also discussed in Note 1, Basis of Reporting for Interim Financial Statements, to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash and cash equivalents. For the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~July~~October 54, 2009, we had a net decrease in cash ~~and~~ and cash equivalents of $910.01 million from December 31, 2008. Cash ~~was~~ was provided primarily from the decrease in restricted cash of $2829.57 million, $1.2 million refund of escrow associated with the sale of STP and ana ~~increase~~$2.8 inmillion ~~foreign~~dividend ~~subsidiaries~~from ~~cash~~our ofunconsolidated $1subsidiary.~~3 million.~~ Increases in cash were more than offset by cash used to purchase $16.1 million of 10.5% Senior Notes, $8.3 million used to pay interest on the 10.5% Senior Notes and 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes, $3.6 million used to pay financing fees related to the Exchange Offer, $5.1 million used to pay interest on the 15.0% Senior Secured Notes, and cash used in ~~investing~~operating activities of $25.74 million, cash used ~~for~~in ~~other~~investing ~~financing~~ activities of $04.82 million, ~~the~~cash ~~effect~~used offor ~~exchange~~other ~~rates~~financing onactivities ~~cash~~of ~~and~~$0.9 ~~cash~~million ~~equivalents~~and ofa $0.12 million, ~~and~~effect ~~cash~~of ~~used~~exchanges inrates ~~operating~~on ~~activities~~cash ofand ~~$8.4~~cash ~~million~~equivalents.

Restricted cash. Our liquidity is affected by restricted cash balances, which are included in current assets and are not available for general corporate use. Restricted cash as of ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $98.20 million and $37.7 million, respectively. Restricted cash at October ~~July 5~~4, 2009 included $32.5 6 million related to deposits for margin calls on our metal hedge programs, $54.5 9 million of deposits to cover our insurance reserves and $0.25 million of other restricted cash deposits. Restricted cash at December 31, 2008 included $16.9 million related to deposits for margin calls on our metal hedge programs, $5.9 million on deposit to cover our insurance reserves, $14.0 million of deposits to cover our silver consignment facility and $0.9 million of other restricted cash deposits. The ~~reduction in restricted cash supporting letters of credit was used primarily to purchase~~ silver ~~that was previously leased through our silver~~ consignment facility ~~which~~ was terminated on February 19, 2009 (see Note 8).

Amounts available from our foreign subsidiaries’ cash and liquidity facilities. Our credit ~~facilities~~facility in ~~Portugal~~ ~~and~~ the Netherlands ~~are~~is available for working capital needs. Our ability to access these liquidity facilities depends on the amount of available borrowing base and is subject to our compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility agreements.

Uses of Liquidity

OnPrior to ~~February~~the 19Exchange Offer, ~~2009~~our wesignificant ~~purchased~~uses ~~our~~of cash were the purchase of our previously leased silver inventory ~~and~~ on April 28, 2009, wethe ~~redeemed~~redemption of our $16.1 million of 10.5% Senior Notes and ~~paid~~the payment of interest ~~and~~ and fees associated with the Exchange Offer. Our primary uses of ~~liquidity~~ liquidity for the balance of 2009 is expected to consist of normal operating activities, capital and restructuring expenditures of approximately $30.9 million ~~and~~ and interest on our Senior Secured Notes.

Redemption of notes . On February 26, 2009, we announced the commencement of the Exchange Offer to each of the holders of our 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes and our 10.5% Senior Notes due March 28, 2009 and April 1, 2009, respectively, to exchange these notes for new Senior Secured Notes in order to refinance those maturities. The Exchange Offer was successfully consummated on April 28, 2009. $83.3 million of the 10.5% Senior Notes and $38.3 million of the 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes were exchanged for new Senior Secured Notes. The remaining $16.1 million of 10.5% Senior Notes were repaid on April 28, 2009.

Purchase of silver from funds securing our consignment facility. On February 16, 2007 we entered into a silver consignment facility with HSBC Bank USA N.A. (“HSBC”). The consignment of silver to us by HSBC under the consignment facility was conditioned on HSBC’s prior receipt and the continued effectiveness of letters of credit in an aggregate amount such that the value of all outstanding consigned silver under the consignment facility is not more than 85% of the aggregate undrawn face amount of the letters of credit. The facility terminated on February 19, 2009 and HSBC drew $13.5 million on the letters of credit to cover the cost of the consigned silver that we simultaneously purchased. The $1.2 million balance of the letters of credit was refunded to us by Wachovia.

Exchange Offer interest and fees paid. On April 28, 2009 we paid $8.3 million in accrued interest and $3.6 million in exchange fees related to the successfully consummated Exchange Offer.

Cash used by operations. Cash used for operations in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 was $1618.78 million compared to $4038.92 million in the same period of 2008.

Capital expenditures. In the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~July~~October 54, 2009, capital expenditures totaled $24.94 million compared to $23.71 million for the same period of 2008. Capital expenditures include asset replacement, environmental and safety compliance, cost reduction and productivity improvement items. Projected capital expenditures for the remainder of 2009 are $30.9 million.

Interest on our notes. ~~As of~~On ~~July~~April 528, 2009, we paid interest of $2.3 million on our 10.5% Senior Exchange Notes and $6.0 million on our 10.5% Senior Notes. In addition, $5.31 million iswas ~~scheduled to be~~ paid on September 30, 2009, which represents the 10% cash interest portion of the 15% Senior Secured Notes.

Funding of pension obligations. In February 2009, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) advised the Company that it may be required to accelerate funding of certain pension related obligations as a result of the closure and/or sale of certain operations of the Company. The PBGC has not made a final determination of the amount or timing of any payments. Since February 2009, the Company and the PBGC have been engaged in discussions regarding this matter. Based upon these discussions and in consultation with special counsel, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the matter will ultimately be resolved through an agreement with the PBGC to fund an amount to be determined and paid in the future. The Company believes any such agreement would result in accelerated funding of the already accrued pension obligations. Accordingly, no additional pension accrual is required at ~~April~~October 54, 2009 or December 31, 2008 since the amount and timing of additional contributions, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~July~~October 54, 2009 that either have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Liquidity Facilities

On February 19, 2009, we terminated our domestic liquidity facilities (receivables sale facility, revolving credit facility and silver consignment facility) in accordance with the terms and on the maturity date of those facilities. Currently we do not have any other liquidity facilities in place in North America. We do have a liquidity ~~facilities~~facility available to use as needed in ~~Portugal and~~ the Netherlands. The terms and conditions of the Company’s Senior Secured Notes have a provision that allows the Company to secure credit facilities under certain conditions prescribed in the Indenture thereto.

Environmental Matters

We have accrued undiscounted estimated environmental remediation costs of $9.54 million at ~~July~~October 54, 2009, consisting of $8.6 million for the Decatur facility and $0.98 million for the Ardmore facility. Based on information currently available, we believe that the costs of these matters are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, actual costs related to environmental matters could differ materially from the amounts we estimated and accrued at ~~July~~October 54, 2009 and could result in additional exposure if these environmental matters are not resolved as anticipated.

Critical Accounting Policies

In ~~April~~March 2008, the ~~FASB~~Financial ~~issued~~Accounting ~~FASB~~Standards ~~Staff~~Board ~~Position~~ (~~FSP~~“FASB”) ~~FAS~~announced ~~142-3~~it ~~(FSP~~would require ~~FAS~~enhanced ~~142-3)~~disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities, ~~Determination~~thereby ofimproving the ~~Useful~~transparency ~~Life~~ of ~~Intangible~~ ~~Assets~~financial reporting. ~~FSP~~Entities are ~~FAS~~required ~~142-3~~to ~~amends~~provide ~~the~~enhanced ~~factors~~disclosures ~~that~~about ~~should~~(a) ~~be considered~~how inand ~~developing~~why ~~renewal~~an orentity uses ~~extension~~derivative ~~assumptions~~instruments, ~~used~~(b) tohow ~~determine~~derivative ~~the useful~~instruments ~~life~~and ofrelated ahedged items ~~recognized~~are ~~intangible~~accounted ~~asset~~for under ~~SFAS 142.~~FASB ~~FSP~~Accounting ~~FAS~~Standards ~~142-3~~Codification (“ASC”) is815, ~~effective~~Derivatives ~~for~~and Hedging, ~~fiscal~~and ~~years~~(c) ~~beginning~~how ~~after~~derivative ~~December 15,~~instruments ~~2008.~~and ~~The~~related hedged items ~~Company~~affect ~~has~~an ~~evaluated~~entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows per the guidance ~~impact~~found ofin ~~adopting~~FASB ~~FSP~~ASC ~~FAS~~815. ~~142-3~~On ~~and~~January ~~has~~1, ~~found~~2009, itthe ~~does~~Company adopted these new provisions which did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB began requiring disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments per ASC 825, “Financial Instrument”, in interim as well as in annual financial statements. This requirement is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has evaluated the impact of adopting this requirement and has found it does not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

On July 5, 2009, the Company adopted FASB’s new general standards of accounting for and disclosing events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, defines: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. Management has reviewed events occurring through November 17, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued and no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or disclosure other than the anti-dumping duty investigation discussed in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies.

On July 5, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). The statement establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, the Statement defines: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. Management has reviewed events occurring through August 18, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued and no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or disclosure.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company will begin to use the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in its fiscal 2009 annual report. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial results or financial position.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our PEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Based upon the evaluation performed by our management, which was conducted with the participation of our PEO and CFO, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The Company has included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and in ~~Form10Q~~its Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the first quarter of 2009 a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s business, future performance or financial condition (“Risk Factors”). The Risk Factors are hereby incorporated in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. The information presented below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the Risk Factors.

Our liquidity is affected by the price of raw materials, particularly copper and silver.

Prices of copper and silver have increased substantially during 2009. Continued increases in the price of these raw materials could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows.

Item 6. Exhibits

Item 6.		Exhibits
		Exhibits
10.1		~~Indenture,~~Letter ~~dated~~Agreement asbetween ~~of April 28, 2009 among~~ Wolverine Tube, Inc., ~~the subsidiary guarantors named therein~~ and UHarold M.S. ~~Bank National Association~~Karp, asdated ~~trustee~~August ~~and~~20, ~~collateral~~2009 ~~agent~~ (incorporated by reference to ~~Exhibit~~exhibit 10.151 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on ~~May~~Augut 426, 2009).
10.2		Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2009 among Wolverine Tube, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2009).
16.1		Letter re: Change in registrants certifying accountant letter from KPMG, LLP to Securities and Exchange Commission dated July 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 16.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 27,
16.1		Letter re: Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant Letter from KPMG, LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated July 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 16.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 27, 2009).
31.1+		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2+		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1+		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2+		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

+ Filed herewith

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.

	Wolverine Tube, Inc.
Dated: August 18, 2009	By: /s/ David A. Owen
Dated: November 17, 2009	By:	/s/ David A. Owen
	Name: David A. Owen
	Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Filing Compare · WOLVERINE TUBE INC