UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

~~xANNUAL~~x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

¨o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________________ to________________________

Commission file number 0-16730

MSGI Security Solutions, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada		88-0085608
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

575 Madison Avenue
New York, New York		10022
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(~~917~~212) ~~339~~605-~~7150~~0245
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:		None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes ¨o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨o

Indicate by check mark if whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will be not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this ~~Form~~ Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ o Accelerated filer ¨ o Non- accelerated filer ¨ o Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨o No x

As of December 30, ~~2008~~2009, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $31,~~218~~916,~~514~~000.

As of ~~September~~October 3031, ~~2009~~2010, there were 3982,~~005~~424,~~805~~371 shares of the Registrant's common ~~stock~~ stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I
Item 1.	Description of Business	3
Item 1. Description of Business			Page 3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	13
Item 1A. Risk Factors			Page 8
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	17
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			Page 13
Item 2.	Properties	18
Item 2. Properties			Page 13
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	18
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			Page 13
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	18
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			Page 13
Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	19
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			Page 14
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	19
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			Page 14
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			Page 14
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			Page 25
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	32
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			Page 26
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures	61
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures			Page 57
Item 9A(T).	Controls and Procedures	61
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures			Page 57
Item 9B.	Other Information	64
Item 9B. Other Information			Page 59
Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	64
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			Page 60
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	67
Item 11. Executive Compensation			Page 64
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	71
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			Page 69
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	73
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			Page 70
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	75
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services			Page 71
Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits	76
Item 15. Exhibits			Page 72
Signatures	~~Signatures~~	77	Page 73

PART I

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K discuss our plans and strategies for our business or state other forward-looking statements, as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions, industry capacity, homeland security and other industry trends, demographic changes, competition, the loss of any significant customers, changes in business strategy or development plans, availability and successful integration of acquisition candidates, availability, terms and deployment of capital, advances in technology, retention of clients not under long-term contract, quality of management, business abilities and judgment of personnel, availability of qualified personnel, changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations, and technology and telecommunication costs.

Item 1. Description of Business

General

MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (MSGI or the Company) is adeveloping ~~provider of~~ proprietary solutions tofor commercial and governmental organizations. The Company is developing a global combination of innovative emerging businesses that leverage information and technology. The Company is headquartered in New York City where it serves the needs of counter-terrorism, public safety, and law enforcement and is developing new technologies in nanotechnology and alternative energy as a result of its recently formed relationship with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

The Company’s Strategy

The Company seeks business and growth opportunities through strategic relationships and sub-contract relationships where its experience and expertise in coordinating and implementing security and other technologies may be employed.

At the current time, the MSGI strategy is focused on the collaboration between the Company and NASA in an effort to commercialize various revolutionary technologies developed by NASA in the fields of nanotechnology and alternative energy. The Company’s initial areas of focus are in the use of chemical sensors or nano-sensing technology and in the use of nanotechnologies geared towards scalable alternative energy solutions which may help provide more efficient operations in yielding lower electricity costs than conventional energy sources.

Under the partnership efforts with NASA, the Company plans to form a number of majority owned subsidiaries, each of which will hold the rights to a specific technology and each will also serve as a vehicle for investment capital. The Company will also function as a co-developer capacity with NASA and will collaborate with several academic institutions including Carnegie Mellon University, Stanford University and the University of California, Berkley in these efforts.

Background

The Company was originally incorporated in Nevada in 1919.

The Company had acquired or formed several direct marketing and related companies. Due in part to decreased market demands and limited capital resources, the Company disposed or ceased operations of all such companies. The following acquisitions and dispositions occurred during the past four years:

Date	Name of Company Acquired / Ownership Interest	Service Performed
July 2005	Acquired additional equity in Future Developments America, Inc. bringing total ownership from 51% stake to 100% and restructured the business with the founders of such business such that Future Developments America, Inc. became a non-exclusive sales organization and the founders (through “FDL” an entity in which the founders own 100% interest) of such business re-acquired the underlying technology and operating assets.	Provider of technology-based products and services specializing in application-specific and custom-tailored restricted-access intelligence products, systems and proprietary solutions

August 2005	Acquired additional equity in Innalogic, LLC bringing total ownership stake to 84%	Designs and deploys content-rich software products for a wide range of wireless mobile devices.

January 2007	Excelsa S.p.A. filed for bankruptcy. The investment, originally acquired in December 2004, was fully impaired.

April 2007	Entered into a license agreement with CODA Octopus, Inc. (CODA) where by MSGI will receive a royalty on sales of products by CODA using the Innalogic proprietary technology.

January 2008 – April 2008	Investments in Current Technology Corp. for a total original interest of 12.6%.	Provider of GPS systems and services for security both for the civilian and military markets.
May 2009	Surrender of a portion of the Investments in Current Technology Corp. bringing total interest to approximately 10.6%

August 2009	Incorporated wholly-owned subsidiary Nanobeak, Inc.	A nanotechnology company focused on carbon based chemical sensing for gas and organic vapor detection

September 2009	Incorporated wholly-owned subsidiary Andromeda Energy Inc.	A company focused on scalable alternative energy solutions employing NASA developed nanotechnology

Date	Name of Company Acquired / Ownership Interest	Service Performed
July 2005	Acquired additional equity in Future Developments America, Inc. bringing total ownership from 51% stake to 100% and restructured the business with the founders of such business such that Future Developments America, Inc. became a non-exclusive sales organization and the founders (through “FDL” an entity in which the founders own 100% interest) of such business re-acquired the underlying technology and operating assets.	Provider of technology-based products and services specializing in application-specific and custom-tailored restricted-access intelligence products, systems and proprietary solutions
August 2005	Acquired additional equity in Innalogic, LLC bringing total ownership stake to 84%	Designs and deploys content-rich software products for a wide range of wireless mobile devices.
January 2007	Excelsa S.p.A. filed for bankruptcy. The investment, originally acquired in December 2004, was fully impaired.
April 2007	Entered into a license agreement with CODA Octopus, Inc. (CODA) where by MSGI will receive a royalty on sales of products by CODA using the Innalogic proprietary technology.
January 2008 – April 2008	Investments in Current Technology Corp. for a total original interest of 12.6%.	Provider of GPS systems and services for security both for the civilian and military markets.
May 2009	Surrender of a portion of the Investments in Current Technology Corp. bringing total interest to approximately 9.5%

Liquidity

The Company has limited capital resources, has incurred significant historical losses and negative cash flows from operations and has limited current revenues. The Company believes that funds on hand combined with funds that will be available from its various operations will not be adequate to finance its operations and capital expenditure requirements and enable the Company to meet its financial obligations and payments under its convertible notes and promissory notes for the next twelve months. Significant portions of our notes payable are past due or due within the next twelve months, and we do not have adequate capital to pay such debts. Further, there is uncertainty as to timing, volume and profitability of transactions that may arise from our relationship with NASA and others, and whether we can adequately fund and commercialize any such technologies. There can be no assurance as to the timing of when or if we will receive amounts due to us for products shipped to customers prior to June 30, 2009 under the sub-contract relationship with Apro Media Corp and such relationship has ceased. There are no assurances that any further or currently anticipated capital raising transactions will be consummated. Although certain transactions have been successfully closed in the past, failure of our operations to generate sufficient future cash flow and failure to consummate our strategic transactions or raise additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and to achieve its business objectives. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of the carrying amount of recorded assets or the amount of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

We have historically financed (and refinanced) our operations with several debt issuances. Notes payable at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Coupon Interest Rate	Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2008, net of discount
6% Notes	Dec. 13, 2009		1,000,000	6%	$	45,940	$ 100
6% April Notes	April 4, 2010		1,000,000	6%		11,630	55
8% Debentures	May 21, 2010		4,000,000	8%		19,891	62
8% Notes	May 21, 2010		4,000,000	8%		4,000,000	-
Term notes short-term	December 31, 2009		400,000	18%		400,000	400,000
Term note short-term	February 28, 2009*		960,000	18%		960,000	960,000
Term note short-term	March 31, 2009*		1,500,000	18%		1,500,000	1,500,000
Term notes short-term	June 17, 2009*		250,000	18%		250,000	—
Short term borrowings from Apro Media Corp	N/A		200,000	N/A		206,950	200,000
Short term borrowings from Current Technologies Corp.	N/A		70,000	N/A		70,000	—
Short term borrowings from officer of the Company	N/A		167,062	N/A		167,062	—
Short term borrowings from others	N/A		60,000	N/A		60,000	—
		$	13,607,062		$	7,691,473	$3,060,217

*These notes are past due, and are now due on demand.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company closed one financing transaction. During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company closed on two financing transactions. Modifications to existing debt instruments and new instruments entered into during 2009 are described below. See description of the accounting implication of certain features of these notes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Term Notes

On December 13, 2007, the Company entered into four short-term notes with private institutional lenders. These promissory notes provided proceeds totaling $2.86 million to the Company. The proceeds of these notes were used to purchase inventory. The notes carry a variable rate of interest based on the prime rate plus two percent. These notes had an original maturity date of April 15, 2008. These notes were not repaid on this date and the terms were amended at several different dates to extend them to their current maturity dates of February 28, 2009 for one note, March 31, 2009 for one note and December 31, 2009 for the remaining two notes. While two notes payable are technically in default at this time, neither of the lenders have claimed default on the notes and the Company is presently in discussions with these lenders regarding extended terms for these notes payable. There are no guarantees that the Company will successfully execute the proposed addendum extensions with the various lenders. As a result of the technical defaults, the interest rates are now 18%

Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company were issued to the lenders in conjunction with these notes. The warrants have a term of 5 years and carry an exercise price of $1.38 per share. The Company allocated the aggregate proceeds of the term notes payable between the warrants and the Notes based on their fair values, which resulted in a discount of $80,208, which was fully amortized in fiscal 2008.

Between April 30, 2008 and April 1, 2009, the Company executed a series of Amendments to the Term Notes, which extended the payment terms for the term notes through February 28, 2009 for one lender, March 31, 2009 for a second lender and December 31, 2009 for the remaining two lenders. Due to the default event, commencing on April 15, 2008, the interest rate is now at the default interest rate of 18% on all four notes. Also, two of the holders now have the right to convert their notes at a rate of $0.51 per share while the remaining two have a right to convert their notes at a rate of $0.25.

In addition, the terms of certain of the Amendments to the Loan Agreements called for the Company to issue five-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company to certain group lenders each week beginning May 1, 2008 and continuing for each week that the principal balance of the term notes remains outstanding. These warrants are to be issued with an exercise price set at the greater of market value on the date of issuance or $0.50 per share. As of June 30, 2008, a total of 284,717 warrants were issued to the note holders, 33,218 warrants with an exercise price at $0.60 per share and the remaining at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. These warrants were subsequently cancelled with the October 2008 addendum and replaced with other warrants and stock issued. In addition, there were 520,000 shares of common stock issued in fiscal 2008 in connection with these addendums.

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, a total of 715,283 additional warrants were issued to the note holders, all with an exercise price of $0.50. These warrants were subsequently cancelled with the October 2008 addendum, as noted below. In addition, other group lenders received shares of common stock of the Company instead of warrants under the Amendments.

Effective October 1, 2008, the Company entered into additional addendum agreements with three out of four lenders with regard to their respectively held Notes, which terminated all warrants to purchase common stock issued under previous addendum agreements, which aggregated 1,000,000 warrants issued under those previous addendum agreements, and, in their place, issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock. At execution of the addendums, the Company issued 378,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 378,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50. The Company issued an additional 252,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 252,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.50, between the date of the agreement and December 31, 2008.

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company entered into additional addendum agreements with two out of four lenders with regard to their respectively held Notes, which issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock and extended the maturity date to December 31, 2009. The Company issued an additional 221,195 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 221,195 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.25 or market value on the date of the grant.

The net effect of all of the addendums to these term notes during the year ended June 30, 2009, was the issuance of 1,055,615 warrants at an exercise price ranging from $0.25 to $0.50 and 1,984,186 shares of common stock. The stock was determined to have a fair value of $420,749 for the year ended June 30, 2009, based upon the fair market value of the common stock on each date issued. The warrants were determined to have a value of $44,987, which includes an offset of the value of the cancelled warrants previously recorded. The warrants were fair valued, at each warrant issuance, using the Black-Scholes model. The warrant and stock values were recorded as additional interest expense on the note during the year ended June 30, 2009.

Exchange of Series H Preferred Stock and Put Options

On January 10, 2008, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Agreement Transaction with certain institutional investors (the Buyers), which consisted of a Series H Preferred Stock, warrants and a put option agreement. The Company received proceeds of $5 million, of which a portion was used to make a significant investment in Current Technology Corporation (see Note 5).

The Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Series H Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The preferred stock shall rank on a pari passu basis with the holders of the common stock in event of liquidation, therefore there is no liquidation preference to the preferred stockholders. The preferred stock is not entitled to any dividends. The preferred stock is convertible at the holder’s election into common stock at a conversion rate of $1.00 per share.

The Company also issued warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. The Warrants are immediately exercisable and provide for a cashless exercise option for the period while each share of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants is not registered for resale with the SEC or such registration statement is not available for resale. The Warrants expire five years following the date of issuance.

The conversion price of the preferred stock and the warrant exercise price are both subject to an anti-dilution adjustment in the event that the Company issues or is deemed to have issued certain securities at a price lower than the applicable conversion or exercise price. Conversion of the preferred stock and exercise of the warrant is limited if the holder would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the shares of common stock outstanding.

Concurrently, the Company entered into the five-year Put Option Agreement with the Buyers pursuant to which the Buyers may compel the Company to purchase up to 5 million common shares (or equivalent preferred shares) at an initial put price per share of $1.20 which is in effect beginning July 10, 2008 through January 10, 2009. At each January anniversary date of the agreement, the put price increases $0.20 over the prior year put price until the put price is $2.00 in the last year of the put option agreement. The Buyers cannot exercise the options under the Put Option agreement until July 10, 2008. The Buyers are initially limited to a Maximum Eligible Amount, as defined in the agreement, of shares that can be put which is initially 1/6 of the total 5 million shares, which increases by 1/6 on each monthly anniversary. The put option agreement also contains a put termination price, which is initially set at $2.00 for the period of July 10, 2008 through January 10, 2009 and then increases by approximately $0.33 for each anniversary year of the contract until it reaches $3.33 at the end of the contract. There are also certain other limitations, as defined within the agreement.

The Put Price may be paid by the Company in shares of Common Stock or at the Company’s election in cash or in a combination of cash and Common Stock. However, there are certain limitations and restrictions within the agreement that may limit the Company’s option to pay the shares in Common Stock and may at that point require cash payment. Payments made in common stock are based upon 75% of the weighted average stock price as defined in the agreement.

As part of the $5 million in proceeds received for this Securities Purchase Agreement, $1,800,000 was designated as restricted cash to be held in a secured Blocked Control Account in order to collateralize the put option agreement and this account was available to be drawn upon by a Buyer exercising its rights under the put option agreement.

The put option agreement was accounted for as a liability under guidance from SFAS 150, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” The Company had to allocate the proceeds between the put option and the preferred stock, and determined that the entire proceeds should be first allocated to the liability instrument. The initial fair value calculated at January 10, 2008 for the put option agreement was $5,800,000. The liability is adjusted to fair value for each reporting period and the fair value at August 22, 2008 was $6,700,000, such that an aggregate loss of $1.7 million has been recognized since inception.

On August 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, LP (Enable), an existing institutional investor of MSGI and as of that date, holder of 100% of MSGI’s Series H Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant to which MSGI retired all outstanding shares of the Series H Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 warrants issued in connection with the preferred stock, exercisable for shares of common stock of MSGI and put options exercisable for 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock, which had a fair value of $6,700,000 on August 22, 2008 (see Note 12). In exchange for the retirement and/or redemption of the above securities, MSGI issued Enable an 8% Secured Convertible Debenture (the 8% Debentures) due May 21, 2010 in the principal amount of $4,000,000 (see Note 6), a $1,000,000 cash redemption payment and transferred to Enable warrants to purchase up to, in the aggregate, 20,000,000 shares of the common stock of Current Technology Corporation. The redemption payment was paid by MSGI from the proceeds of the restricted cash accounts maintained in connection with the original issuance of the Series H Preferred Stock. The balance of the funds held in the restricted cash accounts of $800,000 was released to MSGI for working capital purposes. In connection with the Securities Exchange Agreement and the Debenture, MSGI and its subsidiaries entered into a Security Agreement and a Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, whereby MSGI and the subsidiaries granted Enable a first priority security interest in certain property of MSGI and each of the Subsidiaries. The net effect of this transaction resulted in a gain of $1,700,000, recognized during the year ended June 30, 2009.

Advances

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company received funding in the amount of $200,000 from Apro Media. These funds were advanced to the Company against expected collections of accounts receivable generated under the Apro sub-contract agreement. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received an additional $6,950 from Apro Media, bringing the aggregate to $206,950. There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid to Apro upon collection of the related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received funding in the amount of approximately $70,000 from Current Technology Corp. There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid upon collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received net funding in the amount of approximately $167,000 from a certain corporate officer. There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid upon collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received funding in the amount of approximately $60,000 from certain third parties. There is no interest expense associated with these advanced fundings and they are to be repaid upon collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred.

The advances have no stated maturity dates, and are considered payable on demand. The Company has not imputed interest on the above advances since it would not be material.

Industry

The primary industries in which our companies have historically operated are homeland security and international public safety. In the United States and abroad, homeland security and public safety are not purely separate areas, but rather law enforcement, fire departments, civil defense organizations and medical response teams are a crucial segment of any crisis situation, and work together with multiple government agencies to manage and resolve emergency situations. ~~The~~Principal ~~Company~~domestic ~~believes~~client ~~its~~relationships ~~products~~included ~~and~~the ~~services~~US ~~work throughout the~~Secret ~~chain~~Service, ofUS ~~threat~~Marshals ~~prevention~~Service, ~~detection~~FBI, ~~dissuasion,~~CIA ~~management~~ and ~~resolution~~other ~~to expedite~~commercial ~~the collection and dissemination of data in a secure fashion to field~~organizations ~~agents~~including ~~and~~convention ~~decision-makers.~~centers ~~The Company believes that its new relationship with NASA will serve to broaden its capacities in these areas as well as diversify the range of products~~ and ~~services~~major ~~available and, thus, open the Company to new markets and industries~~hotels.

The Company abruptly put the homeland security business on hold as a result of the breach of contracts between Hyundai, Apro and other enities and the Company. MSGI has since executed several Space Act Agreements with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) forming a partnership between MSGI and the NASA Ames Research Center for the purpose of technology transfer and near-term commercialization of NASA inventions.

The Company believes that its new relationship with NASA will serve to broaden its capacities in the areas of homeland security and public safety as well as diversify the range of products and services available and, thus, open the Company to new markets and industries.

Services Offered by MSGI and its Subsidiaries

Further, MSGI has also historically acquired controlling interests in early-stage, early growth technology and software development businesses. These identified emerging firms are led by entrepreneurs and management teams that have “bleeding edge” products, but lack the infrastructure, business relationships and financing that MSGI can offer. The Company will typically seek to acquire a 51% controlling interest in the target company for a combination of cash and securities. The target company generally must agree to a ratchet provision by which the Company’s stake increases up to another 25% for failure to reach first years expectations. MSGI generally retains a right of first refusal in the event that any of the minority parties in the various companies receives an unsolicited offer for their interests in the business. To the extent these target companies do not meet MSGI’s continuing expectations; the Company will generally dispose of its interests in such operations.

Relationship with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration:

The Company’s collaborative relationship with NASA was begun in August 2009 with the execution of a Space Act Agreement (SAA) forming a partnership between MSGI and the Ames Research Center (ARC) located at Moffet Field in California. The purpose of this collaboration between MSGI and NASA is to develop new prototype chemical sensors using NASA’s nano-sensor technology to meet MSGI’s need in sensor commercialization in security, biomedical and other areas. This sensor technology platform could potentially be used in efforts such as chemical leak detection and hazardous material detection. MSGI intends to develop this technology for commercial applications, homeland security applications, and medical diagnostic applications for type I diabetes (acetone detection) at first and possibly other applications in future years. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in commercializing such applications.

In August 2009, the Company announced the formation of its first subsidiary for NASA based technology. The subsidiary, named Nanobeak Inc. (Nanobeak) is a nanotechnology company focused on carbon based chemical sensing for gas and organic vapor detection. Some potential space and terrestrial applications for this technology include cabin air monitoring onboard the Space Shuttle and future spacecraft, surveillance of global weather, forest fire detection and monitoring, ~~radiation~~ radiation detection and various other critical capabilities. The commercial ~~applications~~ applications of these nanotech chemical sensors relate specifically to efforts in Homeland Security and defense, medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring and controls. Nanobeak seeks to offer products in ~~each of~~ these market sectors beginning in the current fiscal year ending June 30, ~~2010~~2011, but the timing of such offers may be ~~effected~~affected by unforeseen difficulties in development and commercialization efforts. In September 2009, the Company announced that it is ~~launching~~developing its first product derived from the NASA nanotechnology, a handheld ~~testing~~diagnostic device designed for medical and ~~detection~~environmental ~~device~~testing ~~for~~and ~~diabetes~~detection ~~that~~using ~~uses~~breakthroughs ~~breath~~in ~~instead~~nanotechnology ofand ~~blood~~chemical sensing. Nanobeak intends to take the handheld sensor from prototype to commercial production and international distribution. The ~~Company, through~~US ~~Nanobeak,~~Department ~~plans~~of toHomeland ~~engage~~Security inand ~~product~~the ~~testing~~US inDepartment ~~conjunction~~of ~~with~~Defense ~~a major~~have ~~hospital~~already ~~network~~provided inmore ~~the~~than ~~United~~$5 ~~States,~~million ~~followed~~in bygrant ~~licensing~~money ~~discussions~~to ~~with~~ advance the ~~top~~efforts ~~multinational~~of NASA ~~pharmaceutical~~in ~~companies~~developing working prototypes.

In September 2009, the Company announced the formation of its second subsidiary for NASA based technology. Andromeda Energy Inc. (Andromeda) will be focused on scalable alternative energy solutions employing NASA developed nanotechnology. These technologies operate more efficiently than current technologies and therefore yield significantly lower electricity costs per watt than conventional energy systems and sources. The Company has already been approached with potential partnerships in the planned deployment of this new technology, primarily from various major corporations located in the People’s Republic of China. ~~The Company will be required to reimburse certain estimated costs to be incurred by NASA in further development of these technologies.~~

Former Relationships with Hyundai Syscomm Corp. and Apro Media Corp.:

Hyundai

~~The~~In September and October of 2006, the Company’s ~~relationship~~entered ~~with~~into various agreements with Hyundai Syscomm Corp., a California Corporation, (“Hyundai”). Under the ~~began~~License inAgreement ~~September 2006~~and ~~when~~the Subscription agreement, the Company ~~entered~~provided ~~into~~for the asale ~~License~~of ~~Agreement~~900,000 ~~with~~shares ~~Hyundai~~of ~~in consideration~~the ofCompany’s acommon ~~one-time~~stock upon receipt of a $500,000 fee. ~~Under~~under the ~~agreement,~~License Agreement. The three-year Sub-Contracting Agreement with Hyundai allows for MSGI ~~granted~~and its affiliates to participate in contracts that Hyundai aand/or ~~non-exclusive~~its ~~worldwide~~affiliates ~~perpetual~~now ~~unlimited~~have ~~source~~or may obtain hereafter, where ~~development~~the Company’s products and ~~support~~/or ~~license,~~services for encrypted wired or wireless surveillance systems or perimeter security would enhance the ~~use~~value of the contract(s) ~~technology~~to ~~developed~~Hyundai ~~and~~or ~~owned~~its byaffiliates. ~~MSGI’s~~There have been no business ~~majority~~transactions under the Sub-~~owned~~Contract ~~subsidiary,~~or ~~Innalogic,~~License ~~LLC~~agreements to date. The Company has subsequently named Hyundai as a defendant in a legal action taken in the State of California and currently views any and all contracts and agreements with Hyundai in breach.

InThere ~~October~~have ~~2006,~~been ~~the~~no ~~Company~~business ~~entered~~transactions ~~into~~under ~~a Subscription Agreement with Hyundai for~~ the ~~issuance~~Sub-Contract ofor ~~900,000~~License ~~shares of the Company's common stock, in connection with~~agreement ~~the~~as ~~receipt~~ of ~~the~~June ~~$500~~30,~~000~~ ~~received~~2010 ~~for~~or ~~the License Agreement above, subject~~ to ~~certain~~ ~~terms~~date and ~~conditions set forth in~~ the ~~Subscription Agreement. The~~ Company ~~issued~~currently ~~865,000~~is ~~shares~~not ofanticipating ~~common stock at~~any ~~the~~in ~~initial closing of~~ the ~~transaction,~~near ~~and~~future. ~~the~~This ~~remaining~~business ~~35,000~~relationship ~~shares~~has ~~of common~~now ~~stock remain to be issued~~ceased.

In ~~October~~ ~~2006~~May 2009, the Company ~~also~~engaged ~~entered~~legal ~~into~~counsel ato ~~Sub-Contracting~~represent ~~Agreement~~the ~~with Hyundai.~~Company ~~The~~in ~~Sub-Contracting Agreement allows for MSGI and its affiliates to~~potential ~~participate~~legal inaction ~~contracts~~against ~~that~~ Hyundai and~~/or~~ ~~its~~others. ~~affiliates now have or may obtain hereafter~~Subsequently, ~~where~~ the Company's ~~products~~filed ~~and/or~~suit ~~services for encrypted~~in ~~wired~~United orStates ~~wireless~~District ~~surveillance~~Court, ~~systems~~Northern orDistrict ~~perimeter security would enhance the value~~ of ~~the~~California ~~contract(s)~~naming to Hyundai ~~or its affiliates. The initial term of~~, ~~the~~among ~~Sub-Contracting Agreement is three years~~others, ~~with~~as ~~subsequent~~a ~~automatic~~defendant. ~~one-year renewals~~The ~~unless~~Company ~~the~~seeks ~~Sub-Contracting~~restitution ~~Agreement~~for isbreach ~~terminated by either party~~of ~~under~~contract, ~~the~~among ~~terms~~other ~~allowed by the Agreement~~allegations.

On February 7, 2007, the Company issued to Hyundai a warrant to purchase up to a maximum of 24,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for a maximum of $80,000,000 in revenue, which was expected to be realized by the Company over a maximum period of four years. The vesting of the Warrant will take place quarterly over the four-year period based on 300,000 vesting shares for every $1,000,000 in revenue realized by the Company. The revenue is subject to the sub-contracting agreement between Hyundai and the Company noted above.5

There have been no business transactions under the Sub-Contract or License agreement as of June 30, 2009 or to date and the Company currently is not anticipating any in the near future. This business relationship has now ceased.

In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP (GCA), of Mountain View, California, to represent the Company in potential legal action against Hyundai and others. Subsequently, the Company, through GCA, filed suit in United States District Court, Northern District of California naming Hyundai, among others, as a defendant. The Company seeks restitution for breach of contract, among other allegations.

Apro

On May 10, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive sub-contract and distribution agreement with Apro Media Corp. ~~(Apro or Apro Media)~~ for at least $105 million of expected sub-contracting business over seven years to provide commercial ~~security~~ security services to a Fortune 100 defense contractor. ~~Under~~and/or other customers. Under the terms of the contract, MSGI ~~acquires~~will acquire components from Korea and ~~delivers~~ deliver fully integrated security solutions at an average expected level of $15 million per year for the length of the seven-year engagement. The contract calls for gross profit margins estimated to be between 26% and 35% including a profit ~~sharing~~ sharing arrangement with Apro Media, which will initially take the form of ~~unregistered~~ unregistered MSGI common stock, followed by a combination of stock and cash and ~~eventually~~ eventually just cash. In ~~the~~The ~~aggregate,~~Company ~~assuming~~has ~~all~~subsequently ~~the~~named ~~revenue targets are met over the next seven years,~~ Apro ~~Media~~as ~~would~~a ~~eventually~~defendant ~~acquire~~in ~~approximately~~a ~~15.75~~legal ~~million~~action ~~shares~~taken ofin ~~MSGI~~the ~~common~~State ~~stock. MSGI was referred to Apro Media by Hyundai as part~~ of aCalifornia ~~general~~and ~~expansion~~currently ~~into~~views ~~the~~any ~~Asian~~and ~~security~~all ~~market,~~contracts ~~however~~and ~~revenue~~agreements ~~under~~with ~~the~~ Apro ~~contract~~in ~~does not constitute revenue under the existing Hyundai agreements to acquire common stock of MSGI~~breach.

Per the terms of the sub-contract agreement with Apro, the Company iswas to compensate ~~Apro~~ Apro with 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock when the sub-contract transactions ~~result~~resulted in $10.0 million of GAAP recognized revenue for the Company. During the year ended June 30, 2008 the Company recognized approximately $3.8 million in revenues resulting from activities under the sub-contract agreement which such revenues were subsequently reversed. In December 2007, the Company elected to issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Apro pursuant to this agreement. The Company computed a fair value for a pro rata share of the remaining shares to be issued under that agreement, which was $62,336 at June 30, 2008, and was reflected as a liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2008. A credit of $62,336 was realized to the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended June 30, 2009, as reversal for this accrual, relative to the fact that the Company has initiated legal action against Apro and, as such, considers the transactions to be null and void ~~and has no further obligation~~. As such, the remaining shares will not be issued. The total expense for the year ended June 30, 2008 related to shares both issued and issuable to Apro was approximately $1.1 million.

In addition, the Company had additional shipments and corresponding billings to clients of approximately $4.9 million during the year ended June 30, 2008, that was not directly attributable to the Apro sub-contract, but was as a result of direct and indirect referrals from Apro and entities related to Apro. These shipments have not been reported as revenue during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 due to issues surrounding collectibility of payment and other factors and therefore, these transactions did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition as of June 30, 2008 or to date. These shipments will also be recognized as revenue, as well as billings reflected as an asset, if the payments are received. Inventory costs related to these transactions were reported on the balance sheet in “Costs of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not been recognized” and these costs have been fully reserved and written off as of June 30, 2009.

~~The~~Subsequent ~~Company~~to ~~had~~the ~~additional~~year ~~shipments~~ended ~~and~~June ~~corresponding~~30, ~~billings~~2008, tothe ~~clients~~Company innegotiated an acceleration to the ~~aggregate~~sub-contract ofagreements ~~approximately~~with $1Hirsch Capital Corp.6, ~~million~~the ~~resulting~~private ~~from~~equity ~~activities~~firm operated ~~under~~both ~~the~~Hyundai and Apro. Under the accelerated terms, the Company ~~sub-contract~~expected ~~agreement~~to ~~during~~increase its business with Apro by supporting several of the ~~fiscal~~largest commercial ~~year~~businesses ~~ended~~in ~~June~~Korea ~~30,~~with ~~2008~~products and services. ~~These~~The Company also ~~shipments~~expects ~~have~~that ~~not~~this ~~been~~renewed ~~reported~~relationship will bring additional sales to a certain Fortune 100 defense contractor as ~~revenue~~well. ~~during~~As part of this business expansion, the Company ~~fiscal~~expected ~~year~~to ~~ended~~become ~~June~~the beneficiary of various technology transfers 30including, ~~2008~~but ~~due~~not limited to, ~~issues~~Hi-Definition ~~surrounding~~video ~~collectibility~~surveillance ofsystems, Hi-Definition ~~payment~~digital video recording devices and ~~other~~emerging ~~factors~~RFID ~~and~~technology. The ~~therefore~~Company had $400,000 ~~these~~of ~~transactions~~product ~~did~~shipments ~~not~~to ~~meet~~Hirsch Group, ~~the~~LLLP, ~~criteria~~an ~~for~~affiliate ~~revenue recognition~~of this private equity firm, as well as has shipped an additional $4,000,000 of ~~June~~product 30under agreements and referrals from Hirsch Group, LLLP during fiscal 2008. However, none of these shipments have been reported as revenue, as discussed above. These transactions have not resulted in the realization of revenues or toprofits, ~~date~~and the relationships have effectively ceased.

In May ~~addition~~2009, the Company ~~had~~engaged ~~additional~~legal ~~shipments~~counsel ~~and corresponding billings~~ to ~~clients~~ ofrepresent ~~approximately $4.9 million during~~ the ~~year~~Company ~~ended~~in ~~June 30, 2008, that~~potential ~~was~~legal ~~not~~action ~~directly~~against ~~attributable~~Hyundai ~~to the Apro sub-contract, but was as a result of direct~~ and ~~indirect referrals from Apro and entities related to Apro~~others. ~~These shipments~~Subsequently, ~~have not been reported as revenue during~~ the ~~fiscal~~Company ~~year~~filed ~~ended~~suit ~~June~~in ~~30,~~United ~~2008~~States ~~due~~District toCourt, ~~issues~~Northern ~~surrounding~~District ~~collectibility~~ of ~~payment~~California ~~and~~naming ~~other factors and therefore~~Hyundai, ~~these transactions did not meet the criteria for revenue~~ ~~recognition~~among ~~as of June 30~~others, ~~2008 or to date. These shipments will also be recognized~~ as ~~revenue,~~a ~~as well as billings reflected as an asset, if the payments are received~~defendant. ~~Inventory~~ ~~costs~~The ~~related~~Company toseeks ~~these~~restitution ~~transactions were reported on the balance sheet in “Costs of product shipped to customers~~ for ~~which~~ ~~revenue~~breach ~~has not been recognized” and these costs have been fully reserved and written off as~~ of ~~June 30~~ contract, ~~2009~~among ~~(see~~other ~~Note 2)~~allegations.

Subsequent to the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company negotiated an acceleration to the sub-contract agreements with Hirsch Capital Corp., the private equity firm operating both Hyundai and Apro. Under the accelerated terms, the Company expected to increase its business with Apro by supporting several of the largest commercial businesses in Korea with products and services. The Company also expects that this renewed relationship will bring additional sales to a certain Fortune 100 defense contractor as well. As part of this business expansion, the Company expects to become the beneficiary of various technology transfers including, but not limited to, Hi-Definition video surveillance systems, Hi-Definition digital video recording devices and emerging RFID technology. The Company has $400,000 of product shipments to Hirsch Group, LLLP, an affiliate of this private equity firm, as well as has shipped an additional $4,000,000 of product under agreements and referrals from Hirsch Group, LLLP during fiscal 2008. However, none of these shipments have been reported as revenue, as discussed above. These transactions have not resulted in the realization of revenues or profits, and the relationships have effectively ceased.

In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP (GCA), of Mountain View, California, to represent the Company in potential legal action against Apro and others. Subsequently, the Company, through GCA, filed suit in United States District Court, Northern District of California, naming Hyundai, among others, as a defendant. The Company seeks restitution for breach of contract, among other allegations.

Innalogic, LLC:

Innalogic LLC (Innalogic) is a wireless software product development firm that works with clients to custom-design ~~such~~technology asproducts ~~the~~that Umeet specific user, functional and situational requirements.S. ~~Department~~Innalogic ofis ~~Homeland~~an ~~Security~~operating -subsidiary toof ~~custom-design~~MSGI, ~~technology~~which ~~products~~was ~~that~~established ~~meet~~in ~~specific~~2004. ~~user,~~They ~~functional~~are principally focused on the homeland security and ~~situational~~surveillance industry in the United States and ~~requirements~~internationally.

Innalogic has a recognized core competency in an area of increasingly vital importance to security, delivering rich-media content (video, audio, biometric, sensor data, etc.) to wirelessly enabled mobile devices for public safety and security applications over wireless or wired networks.

On April 1, 2007 the Company and Innalogic entered into a non-exclusive License Agreement with the CODA Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA), through its majority owned subsidiary, Innalogic, LLC. This agreement allows for CODA to market the Innalogic “SafetyWatch” technology (the Technology) to its client base, sub-license the Technology to its customers and distributors, use the Technology for the purposes of demonstration to potential customers, sub-licensors and/or distributors and to further develop the source code of the Technology as it sees fit. In return, CODA will pay a 20% royalty to MSGI from the sale of the Technology to its customers. CODA has assumed certain development and operational activities of Innalogic.6

Importantly, Innalogic’s wireless video applications help clients make the critical upgrade of CCTV video security systems from analog to digital technology. Innalogic software applications easily integrate with existing systems - camera or rich-media networks - and are specially designed to incorporate or integrate with new or replacement technologies as they come online.

10Innalogic developed the Wireless Video deployment Package known as SAFETY WATCH - a rapidly deployable, self-contained video surveillance product. It combines secure short-range broadband wireless networking, complete with state-of-the-art video cameras, including world- class command center and mobile surveillance software built upon the foundation of Network-Centric Warfare (NCW) concepts and adaptive architecture.

~~Innalogic~~During ~~SafePassage(tm) is an embedded application software that installs within firmware at~~ the ~~SOC~~year ~~level~~ended ~~and~~June ~~is used to secure the transmission of IP or packet data in a wireless network environment. Innalogic’s “Embedded Modular Cryptography Platform” (EMCP) integrates on the application~~30, ~~transport~~2010, ~~and~~there ~~link layers.~~were ~~Devices,~~no ~~such~~product assales ~~PDAs,~~by ~~handheld~~the ~~computers, and video cameras, using EMCP~~Innalogic ~~- EA, can operate with strong encryption in a wireless network~~subsidiary. EMCP - EA secures wireless data transfer on small devices to support real-time wireless network applications like audio and video feeds, financial transaction processing, and other types of confidential data transmissions.

~~The~~On April 1, 2007 the Company and ~~underlying~~Innalogic, LLC entered into a non-exclusive License Agreement with the CODA Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA). This agreement allowed for CODA to market the Innalogic technology to its client base, sub-license the technology to its customers and distributors, use the technology for ~~ECS~~the purposes of demonstration to potential customers, sub-licensors ~~SafePassage~~and/or ~~applies~~distributors and to further develop the source code of the technology as it sees fit. In return, CODA would pay a 20% ~~wide~~royalty ~~range~~to MSGI from the sale of the Technology to its customers. CODA ~~functional~~assumed ~~scenarios~~certain development and operational activities of Innalogic through this relationship.

~~Scenarios~~Currently, ~~include:~~the Company is focusing on new business development and agreements under the Corporate office of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. While the Innalogic products are still current products of the Company, the Company does not expect any sales of these products in the immediate future, but there may be long-term opportunities.

· Wired or Wireless Video Camera Network

· Sensor Network

· Intelligent Appliances

· Building Automation and Control

SafePassage design modularizes functionality in object oriented software components. These components integrate with other Innalogic Embedded products, or may be used to design an embedded product for a unique customer requirement.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, there were no product sales by the Innalogic subsidiary. During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized $100,000 of referral fee revenue from CODA, in connection with the above License Agreement with CODA. As of June 30, 2009, $60,000 of the fiscal 2008 referral fee remains uncollected and the Company has a full reserve for this balance in allowance for doubtful accounts.

Currently, the Company is focusing on new business development and agreements under the Corporate office of MSGI Security Systems, Inc. While the Innalogic products are still current products of the Company, the Company does not expect any sales of these products in the near future, but there may be long term opportunities.

Future Developments America, Inc. (FDA):

AsFDA is a currently inactive, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. FDA was founded by the same individuals who founded and owned Future Developments Limited (FDL), a Canadian company. As a result of ~~our~~a July 1, 2005 amendment to our agreements with the ~~founder’s~~founders of FDA, the technology and intellectual property being developed at the time was transferred to a ~~company (~~FDL) ~~controlled by the founders of FDA~~ and we, through our subsidiary FDA, ~~are~~became a non-exclusive licensee in the United States of certain products developed by FDL and of other products developed by outside organizations. We also ~~are~~ became entitled to receive royalties on U.S domestic sales of certain products by FDL. No such sales, earning any royalties, have occurred since inception of the amendment.

~~FDL~~Currently, ~~markets a broad variety of off-~~the~~-shelf~~ ~~and~~Company ~~custom~~is ~~surveillance~~focusing ~~equipment, including~~on ~~antennas,~~new ~~audio~~business ~~“bugs”,~~development ~~body cameras, covert~~ and ~~overt~~agreements ~~color~~ and ~~black-and-white cameras~~, ~~night vision fixed surveillance cameras, power~~while ~~supplies, recording devices and related supplies. The firm sells off-~~the~~-shelf closed~~ ~~circuit~~FDL ~~television~~products ~~component~~are ~~(CCTV)~~still ~~equipment~~current ~~from~~products ~~a broad range~~ of ~~high quality~~the ~~manufacturers~~Company, ~~and~~the ~~has~~Company ~~chosen~~does not expect ~~to commit to "exclusivity" with~~ any ~~specific~~ ~~product~~sales ~~manufacturer.~~of Inthese ~~this~~products ~~way,~~in ~~although~~the ~~FDA~~near isfuture. ~~still~~There ~~able~~may tobe ~~offer competitive~~some ~~pricing, they are also free to make suggestions to clients who~~future ~~request~~long-term ~~such~~opportunities ~~information on equipment best suited~~ for ~~their~~this ~~specific~~currently ~~application without~~dormant ~~being limited by exclusivity parameters~~subsidiary.

FDL also markets a one-of-a-kind Digital Video & Audio Transmitter. The product is a two-component, digital, encrypted, spread spectrum video and audio transmitter receiver set that represents the latest advancement in deploying digital wireless technology for intelligence collection, surveillance and security. The transmitter/receiver has a multitude of applications to many areas of Federal, State and local law enforcement, and to numerous agencies within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.MSGI:

Currently, the Company is focusing on new business development and agreements under the Corporate office of MSGI Security Systems, Inc. While the FDL products are still current products of the Company, the Company does not expect any sales of these products in the near future, but there may be long term opportunities.

Client Base

The Company’s potential clients include private and public-sector organizations focused on homeland security, law enforcement, and military and intelligence operations that support anti-terrorism and national security interests, medical service providers, and energy service producers and providers. The firm’s clients will come from a broad range of sectors and industries, and include law enforcement agencies, federal/state/regional agencies and institutions, judicial organizations, oil/gas businesses, commercial properties, banking and financial institutions, hotels, casinos, retail, warehousing and transportation entities, recreational facilities and parks, environmental agencies, industrial firms, loss prevention/investigation agencies, disaster site surveillance firms, bodyguard services, property management, building contractors, construction companies, hospitals and clinics, health care service providers and energy producers and providers. To date we have provided our technology to various private and public sector organizations, both domestically and abroad. We have generated revenues from such deployments, while some deployments were trial-basis demonstrations. Our ability to deliver our technology to customers may isbe hindered by our current liquidity and resource issues.

Competition

Our most recent business development efforts involve the new relationship with NASA. Because the nanotechnologies to be developed and marketed in conjunction with NASA are cutting-edge and newly emerging, it is difficult to determine exactly which other organizations will be our direct competitors in the various industries and markets in which we shall enter and perform.

In our historical business operations, there have been several companies deploying wireless video technologies and covert surveillance tools. Only a handful, however, are doing so with wireless product offerings aimed exclusively at the homeland security and public safety markets. It has been difficult to identify direct competitors of the Company in terms of the Company’s core competencies and basic market positioning. The competitors that come closest to mirroring the Company’s business model are Gans & Pugh Associates, Inc., a developer of wireless systems that employ traditional radio frequency technologies; Verint Systems, Inc., a provider of analytic software-based solutions for video security which competes against the Company in one of its service areas - assessing network-based security relative to Internet and data transmissions from multiple communications networks; and Vistascape, a provider of a security data management solution that integrates the monitoring and management of security hardware and software products.

Facilities

The Company leases all of its real property. Facilities for its headquarters are in New York City. The Company also leases space in San Francisco, California for use in its developing relationship with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Company believes that its ~~remaining~~existing facilities are in good condition and are adequate for its current needs, however, to the extent that the burgeoning relationship with NASA, we may need to seek additional facilities and resources. The Company currently leases the facilities for both its headquarters in New York City and its California office on a month-to-month basis, but expects to execute a long-term lease agreement in the near future. ~~The Company plans to relocate its headquarters to the San Francisco Bay area during the third quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.~~

Intellectual Property Rights

The Company relies upon its trade secret protection program and non-disclosure safeguards to protect its proprietary computer technologies, software applications and systems know-how. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into license agreements and contracts which specify terms and conditions prohibiting unauthorized reproduction or usage of the Company’s proprietary technologies and software applications. In addition, the Company generally enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees, clients, potential clients and suppliers with access to sensitive information and limits the access to and distribution of its software documentation and other proprietary information. No assurance can be given that steps taken by the Company will be adequate to deter misuse or misappropriation of its proprietary rights or trade secret know-how. The Company believes that there is rapid technological change in its business and, as a result, legal protections generally afforded through patent protection for its products are less significant than the knowledge, experience and know-how of its employees, the frequency of product enhancements and the timeliness and quality of customer support in the usage of such products.

Research and Development

The Company recognizes research and development costs associated with certain product development activities undertaken at the NASA Ames Research Facility. ~~The~~ Under ~~Company~~the ~~realized~~terms noof ~~such~~the ~~expenses~~two executed Space Act Agreements, MSGI subsidizes the ~~during~~research and development efforts undertaken by NASA at the Ames Research Facility. During the year ended June 30, ~~2009.~~2010, ~~The~~the Company realized expenses of approximately $88760,~~200~~000 for research and development, through its ~~during~~Nanobeak ~~the~~and ~~fiscal~~Andromeda ~~year~~Energy ~~ended~~subsidiaries. ~~June~~An ~~30,~~additional ~~2008~~amount ~~for~~of approximately ~~costs~~$1.0 ~~associated~~million ~~with~~of research and development is required based on the ofCompany’s ~~RFID~~agreements ~~technologies~~with ~~related~~NASA. toThe Company incurred no such expenses during the year ~~Apro~~ended ~~Media~~June ~~relationship~~30, 2009.

Employees

At June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries employed ~~approximately~~ three persons on a full-time basis. Additionally, ~~two~~the ~~individuals~~Company ~~were~~employed ~~engaged~~various organizations to perform certain investor relations, business development, financing and other general business practices on a consulting basis. We intend to hire additional personnel as the development of our business makes such action appropriate. Our employees are not represented by a labor union or other collectively bargained agreement.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following important factors, among others, could cause our actual operating results to differ materially from those indicated or suggested by forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K or presented elsewhere by management from time to time.

We cannot be certain of the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company currently has severely limited capital resources and has incurred significant historical losses and negative cash flows from operations. ~~The~~In the ~~Company~~fiscal ~~has~~year ~~historically~~ended ~~engaged~~June in30, ~~the~~2010 ~~execution~~we ofincurred ~~various~~a ~~convertible~~net ~~debt instruments,~~loss ~~which~~of ~~have~~approximately ~~raised~~$13.4 million, ~~significant~~had ~~working~~cash ~~capital.~~outflows Afrom ~~significant portion~~operations of ~~such~~approximately ~~instruments~~$1.6 ~~are~~million ~~due~~and onwe expect ~~demand~~to orcontinue ~~with~~to ingenerate ~~the~~significant ~~next~~losses ~~12 months,~~ and ~~the~~ ~~Company~~cash ~~does~~outflows ~~not~~from operations ~~currently~~in ~~have~~ the ~~resources~~future. In toaddition, ~~pay~~as ~~such instruments. The~~of ~~Company~~June ~~has~~30, ~~expended~~2010 orwe ~~committed~~have a ~~considerable~~ ~~portion~~working ~~of the~~ capital ~~raised~~deficit ~~through~~of ~~the~~approximately ~~various~~$26.6 ~~debt~~million. All ~~instruments~~of ~~in the~~our ~~relationship~~approximately ~~and~~$15 ~~business~~million ~~operations~~of ~~with~~outstanding ~~Hyundai~~debt ~~and~~instruments ~~Apro~~are ~~and~~either ~~such relationships~~past ~~have now ceased. In addition~~due, due ~~the~~on ~~Company~~demand ~~has~~or ~~instituted~~due ~~cost reduction~~with ~~measures,~~in ~~including~~ the ~~reduction~~next of12 ~~workforce~~months, and ~~corporate~~the ~~overhead. The~~ Company ~~believes~~does ~~that~~not currently ~~its~~have ~~recently~~the ~~acquired~~resources ~~collaborative~~to ~~relationship~~pay ~~with NASA~~such ~~should~~instruments. ~~yield~~We ~~future~~currently ~~commercial~~have ~~opportunities,~~no active ~~however,~~trade ~~there~~or ~~can~~business bethat ~~no assurances~~will ~~that~~generate ~~this~~revenues ~~will~~and ~~occur.~~therefore ~~The~~the Company will need to raise additional capital to finance its ~~new~~obligations ~~operations~~under the NASA SAA agreements and repay its existing debts,. ~~and~~There ~~there~~ can be no assurances that the Company can raise additional funds or such funds will be available on terms acceptable to the Company. Failure ~~of the new businesses~~ to ~~generate~~ ~~such~~raise ~~sufficient~~additional ~~future~~funds ~~cash~~in ~~flow~~the near term could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and to achieve its business objectives.

We currently have no operating trade or business and may never reach profitability

In 2009 we ended our relationships with our only customers, Hyundai and Apro, and exited the security surveillance business. At that time and through June 30, 2010, we had no business with which to replace the business we ceased. Currently our operations consist of an R&D partnership with NASA in which we are attempting to develop new technologies in which to commercialize. To date, we have yet to commercialize any of the products or technologies that are the subject of our partnership with NASA, nor are we certain of when or if we will be able to successfully produce a technology which we could commercialize. We therefore cannot guarantee that we will ever develop a functional operating business and even should we be able to develop and commercialize a product in partnership with NASA, we cannot guarantee that that product will be profitable. We therefore may never reach profitability.

We may be unable to continue our partnership with NASA

Our agreements with NASA require that we make substantial payments on a defined schedule to enable NASA to adequately budget and provide for the research and development work necessary under our SAA agreements. As of June 30, 2010, we currently are past due in making scheduled payments under both SAA agreements, in the amount of approximately $1 million. To date NASA has accommodated our inability to make payments on schedule, however, NASA is under no contractual obligation to continue to do so and in the event that we continue to be late making scheduled payments, NASA at any point could terminate our SAA contracts, which would include a termination of our license to any technology under the SAA agreements and also could entail NASA no longer pursuing any further business with us.

We are running out of authorized shares our common stock

We have authorized capital of 100,000,000 shares of our common stock. At June 30, 2010 we had 73,674,371 shares issued or issuable. In addition at June 30, 2010 we had consulting agreements outstanding in which we committed to issuing a further 9,800,000 shares shortly after June 30, 2010. Because the Company does not currently have an operating business, we are dependent upon our common stock and instruments convertible into our common stock to act as our currency. We use our common stock and instruments convertible into it to compensate our consultants, to incentivize our debt holders to act in our best interest and sometimes to pay our employees. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 we issued 37.26 million shares and warrants for a further 1.2 million shares to consultants, issued 9.5 million shares under the Enable Exchange Agreement and issued approximately 1.6 million shares to entice lenders to lend to us or to forebear enforcement of default provisions against us.

Should we be unable to convince our stockholders to increase our authorized share capital, we could face significant problems in the upcoming fiscal year retaining and compensating our consultants, maintaining good working relationships with our current lenders and obtaining access to financing. We also have instruments outstanding, in the form of convertible debt, warrants and options, which if converted would require us to issue approximately 99 million more shares which exceeds our current number of authorized shares. Should a significant holder(s) of these instruments decide to exercise their instruments, we may be unable to accommodate them and face significant monetary penalties for failure to deliver the underlying common shares.

We compete against entities that have significantly greater name recognition and resources than we do, that may be able to respond to changes in customer requirements more quickly than we can and that are able to allocate greater resources to the marketing of their products.

The security industry is highly competitive and has become more so over the last several years as security issues and concerns have become a primary consideration at both government and private facilities worldwide. Competition is intense among a wide ranging and fragmented group of product and service providers, including security equipment manufacturers, providers of integrated security systems, systems integrators, consulting firms and engineering and design firms and others that provide individual elements of a system, some of which are larger than us and possess significantly greater name recognition, assets, personnel, sales and financial resources. These entities may be able to respond more quickly to changing market conditions by developing new products that meet customer requirements or are otherwise superior to our products and may be able to more effectively market their products than we can because of the financial and personnel resources they possess. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to distinguish ourselves in a competitive market. To the extent that we are unable to successfully compete against existing and future competitors, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

We are dependent on third party suppliers for principal components used in our products, and disruptions in supply or significant increases in component costs could materially harm our business.

We rely on third parties to supply several key components utilized in the manufacture and implementation of our products and services. Our reliance on suppliers involves certain risks, including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components, price increases, timely delivery and component quality. Although to date, we have not experienced any disruption in supplies of components, we cannot assure you that there will not be a disruption of our supplies in the future. Disruption or termination of the supply of these components could delay shipments of products and could have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and continuous improvements in products and required customer specifications. Due to the constant changes in our markets, our future success depends on our ability to improve our manufacturing processes, improve existing products and develop new products.

The commercialization of new products involves substantial expenditures in research and development, production and marketing. We may be unable to successfully design or manufacture these new products and may have difficulty penetrating new markets. Because it is generally not possible to predict the amount of time required and the costs involved in achieving certain research, development and engineering objectives, actual development costs may exceed budgeted amounts and estimated product development schedules may be extended. Our business may be materially and adversely affected if:

we are unable to improve our existing products on a timely basis;

our new products are not introduced on a timely basis;

we incur budget overruns or delays in our research and development efforts; or

our new products experience reliability or quality problems.

The focus of our key management staff may be diverted by efforts in the legal actions against Apro, Huyndai and others.

The Company has recently engaged legal representation and has filed suit against Apro, Hyundai and certain other entities and individuals in an effort to recover damages to MSGI resulting from the alleged actions by these companies and individuals. In this effort, the management staff may be placed in a situation where its attention is diverted from development and commercialization efforts with NASA to the requirements of these legal proceedings.

Our services and reputation may be adversely affected by product defects or inadequate performance.

Management believes that we will offer state-of-the art products that are reliable and competitively priced. In the event that our products do not perform to specifications or are defective in any way, our reputation may be materially adversely affected and we may suffer a loss of business and a corresponding loss in revenues.

If we are unable to retain key executives or hire new qualified personnel, our business will be adversely affected.

We rely on our officers and key employees and their expertise. The loss of the services of any of these individuals may materially and adversely affect our ability to pursue our current business strategy.

Our relationship with NASA may not develop as we have expected, which may cause the Company to lose all or a portion of our investment.

Our collaboration with NASA may be jeopardized if we have difficulty in assimilating the personnel, operations, technology and software with our newly formed subsidiaries. In addition, the key personnel of NASA or other potential partners may decide to leave their respective companies and positions. If we make other types of acquisitions, we could have difficulty in integrating the acquired products, services or technologies into our operations. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses.

We may face risks associated with potential acquisitions, investments, strategic partnerships or other ventures, including whether such transactions can be located, completed and the other party integrated with our business on favorable terms.

Although the Company continues to devote significant efforts to improving its current operations and profitability, the success of the Company's business strategy may depend upon the acquisition of complimentary businesses. No assurances can be made that the Company will be successful in identifying and acquiring such businesses or that any such acquisitions, if consummated, will result in operating profits. In addition, any additional equity financing required in connection with such acquisitions may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financing may impose substantial additional restrictions on the Company's ability to operate and raise capital. In addition, the negotiation of potential acquisitions may require management to divert its time and resources away from the Company's operations.

The Company periodically evaluates potential acquisition opportunities, particularly those that could be material in size and scope. Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including:

the focus of management's attention on the assimilation of the acquired companies and their employees and on the management of expanding operations;

the incorporation of acquired businesses into the Company's service line and methodologies;

the increasing demands on the Company's operational systems;

adverse effects on the Company's reported operating results;

the amortization of acquired intangible assets; and

the loss of key employees and the difficulty of presenting a unified corporate image.

The largest asset on our books at June 30, 2009 is our investment in Current Technologies, Inc. (“Current”). During 2008, the Company owned approximately 18% of the common stock of Current, and warrants to acquire an additional 20% of the ownership in Current. The company also entered into a subcontract agreement with Current designed to provide sales opportunities for both entities. However, to date, we have not received any sales opportunities from such relationship. We have had to reduce our investment in Current to meet other obligations, such that at June 30, 2009 we own 13% of the common stock of Current, on a fully diluted basis. We may not be able to influence the business relationships as a result of the decline in ownership. Further, the value of the investment in Current may decline, or we may not be able to realize its carrying value, if we are required to dispose of the common stock at unfavorable terms.

We may have problems raising money we need in the future.

We will require additional capital, especially in light of our recent business developments. We may, from time to time, seek additional funding through public or private financing, including debt or equity financing. We cannot assure you that adequate funding will be available as needed or, if it is available, that it will be on acceptable terms. If additional financing is required, the terms of the financing may be adverse to the interests of existing stockholders, including the possibility of substantially diluting their ownership position.

Our business is difficult to evaluate because our financial statements do not reflect the operations of our recently developed business relationships.

Most recently, we have entered into the collaboration with NASA and have subsequently formed new operating subsidiaries. Therefore, our historical operating results may not be indicative of our future operating results. Our financial statements do not reflect such activities, are not comparable to our historical financial statements, nor do they give a clear indication of our future performance.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract management.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These requirements may place a strain on our systems and resources. The Securities Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls for financial reporting. These requirements necessitate that the Company have adequate accounting and internal audit staffing in order to ensure that compliance is achieved and maintained. ~~The Company is required to be in compliance by the period~~ ~~ended June 30, 2010.~~ The Company does not currently have any dedicated internal audit staff and current internal audit capabilities are limited. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight will be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, as we will need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge, or engage appropriate consulting services in order to reach and maintain compliance, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in a timely fashion.

We may ~~experience~~have ~~variations~~errors ~~from quarter to quarter~~ in ~~operating results and net income, which could adversely affect the price of~~ our ~~common~~Form ~~stock.~~10-K

~~We expect~~ The toCompany’s ~~experience~~review ~~significant~~of ~~fluctuations~~its ininternal ~~future~~control ~~quarterly~~over ~~operating~~financial ~~results.~~reporting identified ~~Quarterly~~material ~~fluctuations~~weaknesses. ~~could~~A ~~adversely~~material ~~affect~~weakness ~~the~~is ~~market~~a ~~price~~deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, ~~our~~in ~~common~~internal control over financial reporting such that there is a ~~stock.~~reasonable ~~Many~~possibility ~~factors,~~that ~~some~~a material misstatement of ~~which~~our ~~are~~annual ~~beyond~~or ~~our~~interim consolidated ~~control,~~financial ~~may~~statements ~~cause~~will ~~future quarterly~~not ~~fluctuations,~~be ~~including:~~prevented or detected on a timely basis.

1511

new customer contracts which may require us to incur costs in periods prior to recognizing revenue under those contracts;

the effect of the change of business mix on profit margins;

the timing of additional selling, general and administrative expenses to support new business;

the costs and timing of the completion and integration of acquisitions, sales of assets and investments;

the timing of sales of assets;

the cyclical elements of our clients' industries;

the demand for our products and services;

the market acceptance of new products and services;

specific economic conditions in the electronic surveillance industry; and

general economic conditions.

The anticipated quarterly fluctuations make predictions concerning our future revenues difficult. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations will not necessarily be meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicative of our future performance for any subsequent fiscal quarter or for a full fiscal year. It also is possible that in some future quarters our operating results will be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In such circumstances, the price of our common stock may decline.

Because our sales tend to be concentrated among a small number of customers, our operating results may be subject to substantial fluctuations. Accordingly, our revenues and operating results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of our performance in future quarters, making it difficult for investors to evaluate our future prospects based on the results of any one quarter.

Given the nature of our potential customers and products, we may receive relatively large orders for products from a relatively small number of customers. Consequently, a single order from one customer may represent a substantial portion of our sales in any one period and significant orders by any customer during one period may not be followed by further orders from the same customer in subsequent periods. Our sales and operating results are subject to very substantial periodic variations. Since quarterly performance is likely to vary significantly, our results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that we might achieve for any subsequent period. Accordingly, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful.

The price of our stock has been volatile.

The market price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile, experiencing wide fluctuations. Such fluctuations may be triggered by:

differences between our actual or forecasted operating results and the expectations of securities analysts and investors;

announcements regarding our products, services or technologies;

announcements regarding the products, services or technologies of our competitors;

developments relating to our patents or proprietary rights;

specific conditions affecting the electronic surveillance industry;

sales of our common stock into the public market;

general market conditions; and

other factors.

In recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations which have particularly impacted the market prices of equity securities. Some of these fluctuations appear unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of many companies. Future market movements may adversely affect the market price of our stock.

We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights and we may be liable for infringing the intellectual property rights of others.

Our success depends in part on our intellectual property rights and our ability to protect such rights under applicable patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws. We seek to protect the intellectual property rights underlying our products and services by filing applications and registrations, as appropriate, and through our agreements with our employees, suppliers, customers and partners. However, the measures we have adopted to protect our intellectual property rights may not prevent infringement or misappropriation of our technology or trade secrets. A further risk is introduced by the fact that many legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of certain proprietary rights in the context of the Internet industry currently are not resolved.

WeHistorically, ~~license~~we have licensed certain components of our products and services from third parties. Our failure to maintain such licenses, or to find replacement products or services in a timely and cost effective manner, may damage our business and results of operations. Although we believe our products and information systems do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of others, there can be no assurance ~~that~~ that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us. From time to ~~time~~ time we have been, and we expect to continue to be, subject to claims in the ~~ordinary~~ ordinary course of our business, including claims of our alleged infringement of ~~the~~ the intellectual property rights of third parties. Any such claims could damage ~~our~~ our business and results of operations by:

subjecting us to significant liability for damages;

resulting in invalidation of our proprietary rights;

being time-consuming and expensive to defend even if such claims are not meritorious; and

resulting in the diversion of management time and attention.

Even if we prevail with respect to the claims, litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to defend, and could result in the diversion of our time and attention. Any claims from third parties also may result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims unless we are able to enter into agreements with the third parties making such claims.

There is a limited market for “penny stocks” such as our common stock.

Our common stock is considered a “penny stock” because, among other things, its trading price is below $5.00 per share. This designation requires any broker or dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules may restrict the ability of brokers or dealers to sell our common stock and may affect the ability of investors to sell their shares. In addition, since our common stock has been traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, investors may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations of our common stock and may experience a lack of buyers to purchase such stock or a lack of market makers to support the stock price. Being a penny stock also could limit the liquidity of our common stock and limit the coverage of our stock by analysts.

Future sales of our shares could adversely affect its stock price.

As of ~~September~~October 3031, ~~2009~~2010, there were 3982,~~005~~424,~~805~~371 shares of our common stock outstanding, of which approximately 2875,~~052~~114,000 shares are freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act or are eligible for sale in the public market without regard to the availability of current public information, volume limitations, manner of sale restrictions, or notice requirement under Rule 144(k), and does not include any shares held by or purchased from persons deemed to be our "affiliates" which are subject to certain resale limitations pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining shares of common stock outstanding are eligible for sale pursuant to rule 144 under the Securities Act. Since June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company has issued 148,~~590~~750,~~500~~000 shares of common stock~~. Of these shares~~, ~~5,800,000~~all ~~were~~of ~~issued under a certain Warrant~~which ~~Exchange Agreement, 500,000~~ were issued ~~pursuant~~ to a ~~certain short-tem note, 45,500 were issued pursuant to certain addendum to short-terms loans and 8,245,000 were issued to a~~ variety of service providers for services rendered or to be rendered.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

N/A

Item 2. Properties

The Company is headquartered in New York City where it ~~maintains~~leases and maintains approximately 31,200 square feet of office space~~. We lease approximately 1~~,~~200~~ ~~square feet,~~ which is equipped to fully meet the needs of our corporate finance office. This lease runs on a month-to-month basis with a monthly rent of $89,500. The Company also leases approximately 1,000 square feet of space for office use in San Francisco. This lease runs on a monthly basis with a monthly rent of $3,~~800~~780. It is anticipated by the Company that we will be vacating the space in New York during the third quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 and we will be taking additional space in the San Francisco area when our headquarters are relocated and as the relationship with NASA develops further.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Certain legal actions in the normal course of business are pending to which the Company is a party. The Company does not expect that the ultimate resolution of any pending legal matters will have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP, of Mountain View, California, to represent us in possible action against Hyundai Syscomm Corp., Apro Media Corp., Hirsch Capital Corp. and other entities and individuals. Subsequently, the Company filed suit in United States District Court, Northern District of California, alleging, among other faults, fraud, breach of contract and unfair business practices. The Company seeks financial relief and compensation for the alleged actions of the parties named in the action. The engagement agreement calls for GCA to be compensated for all fees incurred on a contingent basis, pending outcome of the lawsuit, and, further, calls for the Company to issue 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company to each of the two partners managing the legal proceedings.

During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, GCA Law Partners filed a motion to be dismissed as counsel for the Company and formally withdrew from the proceedings. This action was not due to any foreseen difficulties with the Company’s case against the defendants, but rather was the result of the Company’s currently inability to remit cash compensation to the firm on a timely basis. The Company has engaged the assistance of alternative legal counsel and the case is proceeding.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

N/A

1813

PART II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s stock is traded on the “over the counter bulletin board” (OTC:BB) under the symbol “MSGI.OB”. The following table reflects the high and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock for the fiscal quarters indicated, as furnished by the OTC:BB:

		Low		High
Fiscal 2010
	Fourth Quarter	$	0.06	$	0.13
	Third Quarter		0.02		0.18
	Second Quarter		0.04		0.14
	First Quarter		0.02		0.21
Fiscal 2009
	Fourth Quarter	$	0.03	$	0.12
	Third Quarter		0.03		0.20
	Second Quarter		0.07		0.26
	First Quarter		0.20		0.54
Fiscal 2008
	Fourth Quarter	$	0.17	$	0.75
	Third Quarter		0.60		1.05
	Second Quarter		0.86		1.89
	First Quarter		0.47		1.64

As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, there were approximately ~~902~~880 registered holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on any of its capital stock in at least the last eight years. The Company intends to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of its business and, therefore, does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Item 6. Select Financial Data

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. This should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, and notes thereto, included in this Form 10-K. The following is a brief description of the more significant accounting policies and methods used by the Company.

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which the Company relies are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. The significant accounting policies that the Company believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:

· Revenue Recognition and

· Costs of Product Shipped to Customers for which Revenue has not been Recognized

· Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

· Accounting for Income Taxes

Equity based compensation

Debt instruments and the features / instruments contained therein

· ~~Investments~~Derivative ~~in non-consolidated entities~~liabilities

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management's judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management's judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our senior management has reviewed the Company's critical accounting policies and related disclosures with our Audit Committee. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures required by GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates and assumptions made in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements relate to the carrying amount and amortization of long lived assets, deferred tax valuation allowance, valuation of stock options, warrants and debt features and the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates

~~Revenue Recognition:~~14

The Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, (SAB 104), which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. Revenues are reported upon the completion of a transaction that meets the following criteria: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery of our services has occurred; (3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured. Since the Company has a limited number of revenue transactions, that are each unique to each customer, the Company reviews each transaction to determine that all revenue criteria are met.

Our revenues for the year ended June 30, 2009 were derived from consulting services provided to third parties.

The Company had certain shipments to various customers associated with our Apro relationships during fiscal 2008 in the aggregate of approximately $6.4 million that were not recognized as revenue in fiscal 2008 due to certain revenue recognition criteria not being met as of June 30, 2008, related to the assurance of collectability among other factors. These transactions will be recognized as revenue in the period in which all the revenue recognition criteria, as noted above, has been fully met. Therefore, there is no revenue or related accounts receivable recorded for these transactions in 2008 or 2009. Inventory costs related to these transactions for which revenue has not been recognized had been reported on the consolidated balance sheet in Costs of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not been recognized. As of June 30, 2009, the value of all such inventory has been fully reserved and written off, as the revenue transactions has not yet been recognized and there is litigation to attempt to recover some of the damages that we suffered as a result of such transactions.

Costs of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not been recognized

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had capitalized the expense recognition of approximately $5.4 million in product costs for goods that were shipped to customers associated with our Apro relationships as of June 30, 2008 but for which revenue has not yet been recognized. The Company had also recorded a reserve against these product costs in the amount of approximately $1.4 million. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded an additional reserve of approximately $4.0 million, thus fully reserving the entire capitalized balance of approximately $5.4 million. We have instituted a law suit to recover soe of the damages that we suffered as a result of such transactions.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:

The Company extends credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business. Accounts are reported net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Bad debts are provided on the allowance method based on historical experience and management’s evaluation of outstanding accounts receivable. In assessing collectability the Company considers factors such as historical collections, a customer’s credit worthiness, and age of the receivable balance both individually and in the aggregate, and general economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. The Company does not require collateral from customers nor are customers required to make up-front payments for goods and services.

Accounting for Income Taxes:

The Company recognizes deferred taxes for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at currently enacted statutory tax rates and laws for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, as set forth in SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carry-forwards, all calculated using presently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

The Company follows the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides recognition criteria and a related measurement model for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are then measured using a probability weighted approach recognizing the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The adoption did not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements and there is no liability related to unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2009.

Equity Based Compensation:

~~We follow~~The ~~Statement~~Company offollows ~~Financial~~FASB ~~Accounting~~ASC ~~Standards~~718 ~~No.~~in ~~123~~accounting ~~Revised~~for ~~2004~~all ~~(SFAS~~share-based ~~123R),~~payments to ~~"Share−Based~~employees, ~~Payment"~~directors or others. This Statement requires that the cost resulting from all share− based payment transactions are recognized in the financial statements of the Company. That cost will be measured based on the fair market value of the equity or liability instruments issued.

Debt instruments, and the features/instruments contained therein:

Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of its associated debt instrument. The Company evaluates the terms of the debt instruments to determine if any embedded derivatives or beneficial conversion features exist. The Company allocates the aggregate proceeds of the notes payable between the warrants and the notes based on their relative fair values ~~in accordance with Accounting Principles Board No~~. ~~14 (“APB 14”), “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants”.~~ The fair value of the warrants is calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company is amortizing the resultant discount or other features over the term of the notes through its earliest maturity date using the effective interest method. Under this method, the interest expense recognized each period will increase significantly as the instrument approaches its maturity date. If the maturity of the debt is accelerated because of defaults or conversions, then the amortization is accelerated. The Company obtained waivers of the conversion price and exercise price reset provisions and cross default features in certain of the Company’s debt ~~instruments~~and dowarrant ~~not~~agreements ~~contain~~for ~~any embedded~~all ~~derivatives~~of atthe fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009.~~2010 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2011

~~Investments~~Derivative ~~in Non-Consolidated Entities~~liabilites:

~~The~~Beginning ~~Company~~in ~~accounts~~July ~~for~~2009, ~~its investments under~~ the ~~cost~~Company ~~basis~~had ~~method~~convertible ofdebt, ~~accounting if~~accrued ~~the investment is less than 20% of the voting stock of the investee~~interest, ~~or under~~contractually ~~the~~issuable ~~equity~~shares, ~~method~~options ofand ~~accounting~~warrants that if ~~the~~converted ~~investment~~into iscommon ~~greater than 20% of the voting~~ stock ~~of the investee. Investments accounted for under the cost method~~shares ~~are~~would ~~recorded~~exceed ~~at their initial cost, and any dividends or distributions received are recorded in income. For equity method investments,~~ the ~~Company~~amount ~~records its share~~ of ~~earnings or losses of~~ the ~~investee during the period. Recognition of losses will be discontinued when the~~ Company’s ~~share~~authorized ofcommon ~~losses equals or exceeds its carrying amount of the investee plus any advances made or commitments to provide additional financial support~~shares.

~~An investment~~As ~~in non-consolidated companies is considered impaired if the fair~~a ~~value of the investment is less than its cost on an other-than-temporary basis. Generally~~result, ~~an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless (i) the Company has the ability and intent to hold an investment for~~ a ~~reasonable~~derivative ~~period of~~liability ~~time~~is ~~sufficient~~recorded for anthe ~~anticipated~~shares ~~recovery~~issuable ~~of fair value up to (or beyond)~~which ~~the~~exceeded ~~cost of~~ the ~~investment;~~authorized ~~and~~number ~~(ii) evidence indicating that the cost~~ of ~~the investment~~common is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value.shares

Overview

To facilitate an analysis of MSGI operating results, certain significant events should be considered.

NASA

In August 2009, the Company announced that it had executed two Space Act Agreements with NASA forming a partnership between MSGI and the Ames Research Center (ARC) located in Moffet Field, California. The purpose of this collaboration between MSGI and NASA is to commercialize various revolutionary technologies developed by NASA in the fields of nanotechnology and alternative energy. The Company’s initial area of focus is to be on the use of chemical sensors or nano-sensing technology. These wired and wireless detection systems were first developed for space exploration in 2007 and 2008 for experiments carried out on the Space Shuttle Endeavor. The Company intends to form a number of majority owned subsidiaries, each of which will hold the rights to a specific technology and also serve as the vehicle for investment capital.

In September 2009, the Company announced that it had formed its second subsidiary for NASA based technology. The subsidiary is named Andromeda Energy Inc. and it is a nanotechnology company focused on scalable alternative energy solutions that operate more efficiently, and therefore yield significantly lower electricity cost per watt than conventional energy sources. The Company is in receipt of several expressions of interest for partnerships in the planned deployment of this new technology from major corporations located in the People’s Republic of China.

Hyundai

In September and October of 2006, the Company entered into various agreements with Hyundai Syscomm Corp, a California Corporation, (“Hyundai”). Under the License Agreement and the Subscription agreement, the Company provided for the sale of 900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon receipt of a $500,000 fee under the License Agreement. The three-year Sub-Contracting Agreement with Hyundai allows for MSGI and its affiliates to participate in contracts that Hyundai and/or its affiliates now have or may obtain hereafter, where the Company’s products and/or services for encrypted wired or wireless surveillance systems or perimeter security would enhance the value of the contract(s) to Hyundai or its affiliates. There have been no business transactions under the Sub-Contract or License agreements to date. The Company has subsequently named Hyundai as a defendant in a legal action taken in the State of California and currently views any and all contracts and agreements with Hyundai in breach.

Apro Media

On May 10, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive sub-contract and distribution agreement with Apro Media Corp. for at least $105 million of expected sub-contracting business over seven years to provide commercial security services to a Fortune 100 defense contractor and/or other customers. Under the terms of the contract, MSGI ~~will~~was to acquire components from Korea and deliver fully integrated security solutions at an average expected level of $15 million per year for the length of the seven-year engagement. The contract ~~calls~~called for gross profit margins estimated to be between 26% and 35% including a profit sharing arrangement with Apro Media, which will initially take the form of unregistered MSGI common stock, followed by a combination of stock and cash and eventually just cash. The Company has subsequently named Apro as a defendant in a legal action taken in the State of California and currently views any and all contracts and agreements with Apro in breach.

~~CODA~~Stock Compensation

~~On April~~During 1the year ended June 30, ~~2007~~2010, the Company entered into aseveral ~~non-exclusive~~business development, ~~license~~investor ~~agreement~~relations ~~with~~and ~~CODA~~consulting and advisory agreements with ~~Octopus,~~separate ~~Inc~~service providers. ~~(CODA)~~Under ~~whereby~~the terms of these agreements, the Company ~~will~~has committed ~~receive~~to aissue ~~royalty~~shares onof ~~sales~~common stock in lieu of cash in consideration for ~~products~~the ~~using~~services provided and to be provided by these individual firms. As June 30, 2010, the ~~Innalogic~~Company ~~proprietary~~has ~~technology~~issued approximately 37.7 Inmillion ~~connection~~shares ~~with~~of ~~such~~common stock ~~transaction~~in lieu of various categories of cash compensation for services rendered and to be rendered by the firms. Such services include, ~~CODA~~but ~~assumed~~are ~~certain~~not ~~development~~be limited to, investor relations, identification of potential providers of equity or hybrid financing, the identification of strategic or joint-venture and ~~operations~~licensing partners, ~~responsibilities~~the identification of merger and/or acquisition candidates, the provision of general business advice, the ~~Innalogic~~overview ~~entity~~of governmental procurement programs, the preparation of disclosure, marketing and promotional materials.

Major recent financing transactions

~~On December~~In 13July 2009, ~~2007,~~ the Company ~~entered~~executed ~~into~~a ~~four~~NASA ~~short-term~~Funding ~~notes~~Promissory ~~with~~Note ~~private~~in the amount of ~~institutional~~$240,004 ~~lenders.~~with ~~These~~a ~~promissory~~lender ~~notes~~who ~~provided~~also ~~proceeds~~holds ~~totaling~~a ~~$2.86 million~~promissory tonote ~~the~~from ~~Company~~December 2007. The new ~~proceeds~~promissory ofnote ~~these~~was ~~notes~~executed ~~were~~in ~~used~~order to ~~purchase inventory~~enable tothe ~~fulfill~~Company ~~various~~to ~~purchase~~meet ~~orders~~its obligations ~~referred~~under toa uscertain bySpace ~~Apro.~~Act ~~These~~Agreement, ~~notes have~~which had been ~~amended~~entered into atwith ~~various~~The ~~times~~National Aeronautics and ~~now~~Space ~~bear~~Administration. The note bears interest at 1825% ~~per~~and ~~annum.~~matured Ason ~~of June~~August 30, 2009. In addition, ~~these~~the ~~short-term~~Company ~~notes~~was obligated ~~remain~~to ~~outstanding~~issue 500,000 shares of common stock to the ~~four~~lender ~~lenders~~as additional consideration to enter into the note agreement. The shares were issued to the lender in September 2009. As of the date of this filing, the principal balance and ~~all~~accrued ~~are~~interest ~~due~~has onnot ~~demand~~yet ~~and~~been ~~are~~paid ~~classified~~to the lender. Although the note is technically in default as ~~current~~of ~~liabilities~~the ondate of this filing, the lender has made no ~~consolidated~~formal ~~balance~~claim ~~sheet~~of default and the Company is currently in negotiations with the lender for extension of the terms.

~~On January~~In 10March 2010, ~~2008,~~ the Company ~~issued~~entered ~~(i)~~into ~~5,000,000~~a ~~shares~~series of ~~the~~10% ~~Company’s Series~~convertible Hpromissory ~~Convertible~~notes ~~Preferred Stock (ii) a Put Option agreement and (iii) warrants exercisable~~ for ~~5,000,000 shares of Common Stock at~~ an ~~exercise~~aggregate ~~price~~ of $2650,000.50 ~~per~~Closing ~~share.~~costs ~~The Buyers paid a total~~ of approximately $581,000~~,000~~ ~~for~~were ~~securities~~paid ~~issued~~from in the ~~Preferred Stock Transaction. From the Total Purchase Price~~proceeds, ~~$2,000,000 was~~providing ~~used~~a tonet ~~purchase the securities~~ of ~~Current~~approximately ~~Technology and~~ $1569,~~800,~~000. ~~was placed~~These innotes carry a maturity ~~restricted~~life ~~cash~~of ~~account~~one toyear befrom ~~used as collateral for~~ the ~~Company’s obligations~~date ~~under the Put Option Agreement. See below for a description~~ of ~~the Securities Exchange Transaction~~issuance.

~~On January~~In 10June 2010, ~~2008,~~ the Company entered into a ~~Subscription~~series ~~Investment Agreement with Current Technology Corporation, a corporation formed under the laws~~ of ~~the Canada~~10% ~~Business~~convertible ~~Corporation~~promissory ~~Act.~~notes ~~Under this agreement, at March 31, 2009, the~~for ~~Company~~an ~~has~~aggregate ~~invested a total~~ of $~~2 million and owns 20 million shares of the common stock of Current Technology~~300, ~~which represents approximately 13% ownership of their outstanding common stock~~000. In ~~addition,~~Closing ~~the~~costs ~~Company held warrants to purchase 20 million additional shares~~ of ~~common~~approximately ~~stock. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has an option to invest an additional~~ $~~500~~10,000 ~~under~~ ~~the original agreement terms. In August 2008, the 20 million warrants~~ were ~~assigned~~ topaid ~~a third party as part of a Securities Exchange Agreement involving~~from the ~~Company’s Preferred Stock. During the year ended June 30~~proceeds, ~~2009,~~providing ~~the~~a ~~Company was~~net ~~forced~~of toapproximately ~~surrender 5~~$290,000~~,000~~. ~~shares~~These ofnotes ~~common~~carry ~~stock in Current Technology~~a asmaturity ~~part~~life of anone ~~amendment~~year ~~to a loan agreement associated with an advance~~ from ~~an officer~~the ~~(see~~date ~~Note~~of 5)issuance.

22During 2010 and 2009, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $674,000 and $167,000 of advances from a certain corporate officer, which have no stated interest rate or maturity date.

OnResults ~~August 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, LP (Enable), an existing institutional investor~~ of ~~MSGI~~Operations ~~and as~~Fiscal of2010 ~~that~~Compared ~~date, holder of 100% of MSGI’s Series H Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant~~ to ~~which~~Fiscal MSGI retired all outstanding shares of the Series H Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 warrants issued in connection with the preferred stock, exercisable for shares of common stock of MSGI and put options exercisable for 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Enable recently acquired the Series H Preferred Stock, Warrants and Put Options pursuant to a private transaction with third parties.2009

OnFor ~~March 16, 2009,~~ the ~~Company entered into three convertible promissory notes with~~ ~~Enable~~year ~~which~~ended ~~provided~~June ~~the Company with gross proceeds of $250~~30,~~000.~~ ~~The~~2010 ~~notes bear interest at a rate of 10% annually and are convertible into shares of common stock of~~ (the ~~Company~~Current ~~at a conversion rate of $0.25 per share. As an incentive for Enable to issue these convertible promissory notes~~Period), the Company ~~and~~ ~~Enable~~realized ~~entered into a certain warrant exchange agreement whereby Enable has~~no ~~been granted the right to exchange all warrants held from previous transactions into 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company~~revenues. ~~The original warrants carry exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $2.50 and represent a total of 14,642,852 shares available to purchase.~~

~~During 2009 and 2008, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $167,000 and $0 of advances from officers and others, which have no stated interest rate or maturity date.~~16

~~Results~~For ofthe year ~~Operations~~ended ~~Fiscal~~ June 30, 2009 ~~Compared~~(the toPrior ~~Fiscal~~Period), ~~2008~~the Company realized revenues in the amount of $282,000 which was generated from providing consulting services.

~~For~~Costs ~~the~~of ~~year~~goods ~~ended~~sold ~~June~~of ~~30,~~approximately ~~2009~~$4.1 (million in the ~~Current~~Prior Period), were the result of the Company ~~realized~~recording ~~revenues~~a reserve for potential loss in recognition of potential recovery issues surrounding costs associated with product shipped to customers during the ~~amount~~fiscal ofyear ~~$282~~ended Jun 30,~~000~~ ~~from~~2008 ~~consulting~~for ~~service~~which ~~provided~~revenue has not yet been recognized due to ~~third~~recognition criteria on the transactions having not been met. ~~parties~~There were no such costs realized during the Current Period.

~~For the~~Research ~~year~~and ~~ended~~development ~~June~~expenses ~~30, 2008 (the Prior Period), the Company realized revenues in the amount~~ of approximately $~~3.8 million from the sales of products through our relationship with Apro Media Corp.~~760, ~~a $100,~~000 ~~royalty~~were ~~fee~~incurred /during ~~referral fee income generated from~~ the ~~CODA Octopus Group, Inc., and $128,000 for consulting~~ ~~services.~~Current ~~The Company had additional shipments and corresponding billings to various customers in the aggregate of approximately $6~~Period.5 ~~million,~~These ~~which~~expenses ~~have~~were ~~not been~~paid ~~recognized as revenues in fiscal 2008 or fiscal 2009~~ to ~~date~~NASA as areimbursement ~~result~~for ofresearch ~~issues surrounding collectibility. In addition, the $6.5 million of billings have been reversed~~ and ~~are~~development ~~not~~costs ~~reflected~~incurred asby ofNASA ~~June~~under ~~30,~~certain ~~2008~~Space ~~or 2009. Of~~Act ~~these shipments~~Agreements, ~~approximately $1.6 million were from~~which ~~shipments~~have ofbeen ~~products~~executed ~~through our relationship~~ with ~~Apro~~the ~~and approximately $4~~Company.~~9 million~~ There were ~~from~~no ~~shipments~~such tocosts ~~other~~in ~~customers~~the ~~referred to us by~~Prior ~~Apro~~Period.

~~Costs of~~Salaries ~~goods~~and ~~sold~~benefits of approximately $~~4.1~~694,000 ~~million~~ in the Current Period ~~were~~decreased ~~the result~~by ofapproximately ~~the~~$406,000 ~~Company~~from ~~recording~~salaries aand ~~reserve~~benefits ~~for potential loss in recognition~~ of ~~potential~~ ~~recovery~~approximately ~~issues~~$1.1 ~~surrounding costs associated with product shipped to~~million ~~customers~~in ~~during~~ the Prior Period. ~~for~~Salaries ~~which~~and ~~revenue~~benefits ~~has~~decreased ~~not~~primarily ~~yet~~due ~~been~~to ~~recognized~~one-time ~~due~~adjustments to ~~recognition~~accruals ~~criteria~~of onadditional ~~the~~payroll ~~transactions~~taxes, ~~having~~penalties ~~not~~and ~~been~~interest booked ~~met.~~in ~~These~~the ~~costs are~~Prior ~~not~~Period ~~associated~~by ~~with~~ the ~~revenue~~Company, which were not realized during the ~~Current~~ Current Period.

~~Costs of~~Selling, ~~goods~~general ~~sold~~and administrative expenses of approximately $43.29 million in the ~~Prior~~ Current Period ~~consisted~~increased ~~primarily of the expenses related to acquiring the components required to provide the specific technology applications ordered~~ by ~~individual~~approximately ~~customers~~$2.5 ~~The~~million ~~Company classified~~from ascomparable anexpenses ~~asset~~of ~~approximately~~ $51.4 million in ~~costs associated with~~ the ~~product~~ ~~shipped during the~~ Prior Period ~~due to the revenue recognition criteria on these transactions have not been met~~. The ~~Company~~increase ~~recorded~~is adue ~~reserve~~primarily ~~for potential~~to ~~loss~~the ofcost ~~approximately $1.4 million in recognition~~ of ~~potential~~shares ~~recovery~~and ~~issues~~warrants ~~for~~issued ~~certain~~to ofvarious ~~such~~consultants ~~transactions~~for services, which isresulted ~~included~~ in ~~costs of~~an ~~goods~~increase ~~sold~~in ~~for the Prior Period. The gross profit realized on individual commercial sales averaged 26% for transactions for product shipments, with the revenue for the referral and~~ consulting ~~fee~~expenses ~~raising~~of ~~the~~approximately ~~overall gross profit to the 30%~~$2. ~~This~~8 ~~was~~million ~~offset~~versus ~~with~~ the ~~reserve against the product costs,~~Prior ~~which~~Period, ~~created~~offset ~~the~~by ~~negative~~decreases ~~gross margin since there was no revenue recognized~~ in ~~fiscal~~ ~~2008~~other ~~against~~various ~~these~~expenses ~~transactions.~~such ~~The~~as ~~Company~~rent ~~has~~and ~~commenced litigation~~travel ~~against~~related ~~the parties to such transaction for breach of contract~~costs.

~~Research~~During ~~and development expenses were approximately $88,000 in~~ the ~~Prior~~Current Period, ~~and related to~~ the ~~development~~Company ofrecorded ~~RFID~~depreciation ~~technologies.~~and ~~There~~amortization ~~were no such costs~~expense ~~realized in the Current Period. The Company ceased much~~ of ~~its~~approximately ~~operations~~$13,000, ~~as it re-focused its business relationships from Apro/Hyundai to NASA related technologies.~~which

~~Salaries and~~was ~~benefits of approximately $1.1 million~~ in ~~the Current Period decreased by~~ ~~approximately~~line ~~$1.2~~with ~~million~~comparable ~~from~~expenses ~~salaries and benefits~~ of approximately ~~$2.3 million in the Prior Period. Salaries and benefits decreased primarily due to accruals of additional payroll taxes~~15,000 ~~penalties and interest booked~~ in the Prior Period ~~by the Company, which were not realized during the Current Period~~.

23Interest expense of approximately $9.2 million in the Current Period increased by approximately $6.5 million from interest expense of approximately $2.7 million in the Prior Period. This increase is due primarily to an increase in non-cash interest expenses derived from the amortization of certain debt discounts as well as from interest accrued on new debt instruments issued during the current period.

~~Selling,~~During ~~general~~the ~~and~~Current ~~administrative~~Period, ~~expenses~~the ofCompany ~~approximately~~realized ~~$1.4~~a ~~million~~loss inon the investment in Current ~~Period~~Technology ~~decreased~~Corp. byof approximately $3.1 ~~million or 69% from comparable expenses of $4~~.52 million ~~in the Prior Period~~. ~~The~~As ~~decrease~~of isJune ~~due~~30, ~~primarily~~2010, to the ~~cost~~Company ofowns ~~shares~~15 ~~issued~~million toshares ~~Apro~~of inthe ~~connection~~common ~~with~~stock ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~Current ~~sub-contract agreement~~Technology, which represents ~~resulted~~approximately in10.6% anownership ~~expense~~ of ~~approximately~~its $1outstanding common stock.1 During ~~million in~~ the ~~Prior~~ ~~Period~~fiscal ~~versus~~year aended ~~credit~~June of30, ~~approximately $62~~2010,~~000~~ in the ~~Current Period, as~~Company ~~well~~determined asthat ~~reductions~~the fall in ~~investor~~the ~~relations~~value ofbased ~~approximately~~on ~~$1.0~~the ~~million, professional~~trading ~~fees~~price ~~such~~of asthe ~~legal~~stock ~~and~~of Current ~~accounting~~Technology ofwas ~~approximately~~an ~~$0.6~~other-than-temporary ~~million, office~~impairment ~~expenses~~in ofthe ~~approximately~~value $0of its investment.1 ~~million~~The ~~and~~Company ~~travel~~recorded ~~and~~an ~~entertainment expenses~~impairment of ~~approximately~~ $01.2 million. ~~The~~to ~~Company~~reduce ~~ceased much of~~ its ~~operations~~investment asto itthe ~~re-focused~~trading ~~its~~price ~~business~~of ~~relationships~~Current ~~from~~Technology ~~Apro/Hyundai~~as toof ~~NASA related~~June ~~technologies~~30, 2010.

During the Current Period, the Company ~~recorded~~realized ~~depreciation~~a ~~and~~gain ~~amortization~~on ~~expense~~change in certain derivative liabilities of approximately $~~15,000,~~2.4 ~~which~~million. ~~represented~~This again ~~decrease~~represents ofan ~~approximately~~adjustment ~~$12,000~~to ~~from~~the ~~comparable~~derivative ~~expenses~~liability related to the number of ~~approximately~~common ~~$27~~stock shares,~~000~~ inwhich would exceed the ~~Prior~~authorized ~~Period.~~number ~~This~~of common stock shares, if convertible debt ~~variance~~and isequity ~~the~~instruments ~~result~~were ofexercised ~~certain~~and ~~intangible~~converted ~~assets~~into ~~being~~common ~~fully~~stock, ~~amortized~~based ~~during~~on ~~the~~fair ~~Prior~~value ~~Period~~calculated by Black-Scholes as of June 30, 2010.

~~Interest~~During ~~income~~the ofPrior ~~approximately $13~~Period,~~000~~ in the ~~Current~~Company ~~Period~~recognized ~~increased~~expenses ~~over~~for ~~interest~~adjustments to the fair ~~income~~market value of ~~approximately~~certain put options of $6150,000. inThese expenses represent the adjustment ~~Prior~~to ~~Period~~the ~~due~~fair ~~primarily~~market tovalue of the ~~Company holding~~put ~~larger~~options ~~average~~as ~~cash~~of ~~balances~~August ~~during~~22, ~~the~~2008 ~~course~~on which ofdate the ~~Current~~put ~~Period~~options were redeemed and subsequently ~~than~~cancelled. As ~~that~~such, ofthere ~~the~~were ~~Prior~~no such expenses in the Current Period.

~~Interest~~During ~~expense~~the ofPrior ~~approximately~~Period, ~~$2.7~~the ~~million~~Company inrecognized ~~the~~a ~~Current~~gain ~~Period~~on ~~decreased~~the bysecurities exchange ~~approximately~~agreement of $81.97 million. ~~from~~This ~~interest~~gain ~~expense~~is ofthe ~~approximately~~result ~~$11.6~~of ~~million in~~ the ~~Prior~~redemption ~~Period.~~and subsequent ~~The~~cancellation ~~expenses~~of inall ~~the~~put ~~Prior~~options, ~~Period~~Series ~~were~~H ~~due~~Preferred ~~primarily~~Stock toand ~~the~~certain ~~effect~~related ofwarrants ~~certain~~held ~~repricing~~by ~~transactions~~Enable ~~during~~on ~~the~~August ~~year~~22, ~~affecting~~2008 ~~certain debt instruments~~ and the ~~adjustments~~related toissuance ~~the~~by us ~~values~~ of ~~certain~~the ~~equity~~new ~~instruments granted~~$4 tomillion convertible note, ~~holders.~~a ~~The~~$1 ~~non-~~million cash ~~component~~payment and the issuance of ~~interest~~20 ~~expense~~million ~~was approximately~~warrants ~~$1.5~~for ~~million~~shares inof ~~the~~common stock of Current ~~Period~~Technology Corporation. asThere ~~compared~~was tono ~~$9.8~~such ~~million~~gain recognized in the ~~Prior~~ Current Period.

Non-cash expenses for the revaluation of the fair value of the put option in the amount of approximately $1.6 million were realized in the Prior Period. These expenses related to recognition by the Company of the fair value of the put options issued with the Convertible Series H Preferred Stock, above the amount of gross proceeds of the issuance of the stock. An additional non-cash expense or approximately $150,000 was realized in the Current Period, such that an aggregate loss of $1.7 million has been recognized since inception. This aggregate loss was offset by a gain of approximately $1.7 million in the Current Period upon cancellation and redemption of the Series H Preferred Stock. There is no outstanding Series H Preferred Stock as of June 30, 2009.

The non-cash loss on debt guarantee realized during the Current Period was the result of the forfeiture of a portion of the Company’s investment in Current Technology Corporation under the guarantee of a certain bridge loan agreement, which was entered into by Mr. J. Jeremy Barbera, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of MSGI (see Note 16) ), and for which a portion of the proceeds were used to advance funds to the Company. The Company surrendered 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Current Technology Corporation at a carrying value of $500,000. The Company has no further guarantee obligations under the bridge loan agreement.

Our provision for income taxes is minimal and primarily due to state and local taxes incurred on taxable income or equity at the operating subsidiary level, which cannot be offset by losses incurred at the parent company level or other operating subsidiaries. The Company has recognized a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets because it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable income will not be generated during the carry forward period to utilize the deferred tax assets.

As a result of the above, net loss attributable to common stockholders of approximately $8.0 million in the Current Period decreased by approximately $12.2 million from comparable net loss of $20.2 million in the Prior Period.17

The Company has not filed income tax returns or payroll tax returns for three and four years, respectively.

As a result of the above, net loss attributable to common stockholders of approximately $13.4 million in the Current Period increased by approximately $5.4 million over comparable net loss of $8.0 million in the Prior Period.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Financial Reporting Release No. 61, which was released by the SEC, requires all companies to include a discussion to address, among other things, liquidity, off-balance sheet arrangements, contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The Company currently does not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, the Company has funded its operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions primarily through private placements of equity and debt transactions. The Company currently has limited capital resources, has incurred significant historical losses and negative cash flows from operations and has limited current revenues. At June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company had approximately $~~700~~161,000 in ~~cash~~ cash and no accounts receivable. The Company believes that funds on hand ~~combined~~ combined with funds that will be available from its various operations will not be be adequate to finance its operations and enable the Company to meet its ~~financial~~ financial obligations and payments under its convertible notes and promissory notes for the next twelve months. AAll ~~significant portion~~ of our promissory notes and ~~and~~ other notes payable are currently either past due or due within the next 12 months. ~~Further, there is uncertainty as to timing, volume and profitability of transactions that may arise from our relationship with NASA and others.~~ There can be no assurance as to the timing of when we will receive amounts due to us for products shipped to customers prior to June 30, 2009, and we have commenced litigation to attempt to recover damages. There are no assurances that any further capital raising transactions will be consummated. Although certain transactions have been successfully closed in the past, failure of our operations to generate sufficient future cash flow and failure to consummate our strategic transactions or raise additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and to achieve its business objectives. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of the carrying amount of recorded assets or the amount of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

~~The~~Analysis ~~transactions~~of ~~described~~cash ~~below~~flows ~~were~~during ~~entered~~fiscal ~~into~~years ~~after~~ended June 30, ~~2009,~~2010 and ~~will impact our liquidity~~2009:

~~In July~~The ~~2009, the~~ Company ~~executed~~realized a ~~NASA~~net ~~Funding~~loss ~~Promissory~~of ~~Note~~approximately ~~in the amount of~~ $~~240,004~~13.4 ~~with~~and ~~a lender who also holds a promissory note from December 2007~~$8.0 ~~The new~~million ~~promissory note was executed~~ in ~~order to enable~~ the ~~Company to meet its~~ ~~obligations~~Current ~~under~~Period aand ~~certain~~Prior ~~Space Act Agreement~~Period, ~~which had been entered into with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration~~respectively. The ~~note~~net ~~bears~~loss ~~interest~~includes atapproximately ~~25%~~$11.8 million and ~~matures on August 30, 2009~~$6.7 Inmillion ~~addition,~~of ~~the~~non-cash ~~Company~~charges ~~is obligated~~ to our ~~issue~~statement ~~500,000 shares~~ of ~~common~~operations ~~stock~~in to the ~~lender~~Current asand ~~additional~~Prior ~~consideration~~Periods, ~~to enter into the note agreement~~respectively. Cash ~~The~~used ~~shares~~in ~~were~~operating ~~issued~~activities towas ~~the lender in~~approximately ~~September 2009~~$1.6 ~~As of the date of this filing, the principal balance~~ and ~~accrued interest has not yet been paid to the lender~~$1.3 ~~Although~~million ~~the note is technically~~ in ~~default as of~~ the ~~date~~Current ofPeriod ~~this~~and ~~filing,~~Prior ~~there has been no claim of default by~~Period, ~~the~~respectively. In ~~lender and~~ the ~~Company~~Current isPeriod, ~~currently~~our insignificant ~~negotiations with the lender for an~~cash ~~extension~~expenses towere ~~the~~approximately ~~terms~~$500,000 ofunder the ~~note.~~NASA ~~There~~SAA isAgreements, no$200,000 ~~guarantee that the Company will~~for ~~be successful in this effort. Since June 30~~rent, ~~2009~~$100,000 ~~the~~for ~~Company~~travel ~~has~~and ~~issued 14,590,500~~entertainment ~~shares~~most of ~~common~~which ~~stock.~~was Ofincurred ~~these~~in attempting ~~shares,~~to ~~5,800,000~~raise ~~were~~additional ~~issued~~equity ~~under a~~and ~~certain~~debt ~~Warrant~~financing ~~Exchange~~and ~~Agreement,~~another ~~500~~$800,000 ~~were~~in general ~~issued~~and ~~pursuant~~administrative tocosts aranging ~~certain short-tem~~from ~~note~~consultants, ~~45,500~~to ~~were~~lawyers ~~issued pursuant~~ to insurance ~~certain~~and ~~addendum~~other tocosts. As ~~short-terms loans~~of ~~and~~June 830,~~245~~ 2010,~~000~~ ~~were~~we ~~issued~~currently toowe approximately a$1 ~~variety~~million ofunder ~~service~~the ~~providers~~NASA ~~for~~SAA ~~services to be rendered~~Agreements.

~~Analysis~~Because of the fact that we had very limited cash ~~flows~~resources, ~~during~~we utilized our stock as our currency in the fiscal ~~years~~year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, issuing 32.6 million shares to consultants, 9.5 million shares to Enable under a warrant exchange agreement and ~~2008:~~a further 1.6 million shares to lenders and others as inducement to lend us additional funds and to forego enforcement of certain provisions relating to cross default and resets of conversion and or exercise prices. We expect to continue to use our stock as our currency as we have a limited ability to raise new capital until such time as we can demonstrate that we can build a viable new business from our relationship with NASA.

~~The~~During the Current Period, the Company realized a net ~~loss~~cash of approximately $81.08 ~~and $20.2~~ million ~~in the~~ ~~Current~~from ~~Period~~financing ~~and~~activities ~~Prior~~related ~~Period,~~primarily ~~respectively.~~from ~~The~~proceeds ~~net~~from ~~loss includes~~convertible ~~approximately~~promissory ~~$2.3~~notes ~~million~~ and ~~$13.4~~advances ~~million~~from ofa ~~non-cash~~certain ~~charges~~corporate ~~to our statement of operations in the Current and Prior Periods, respectively~~officer. ~~Cash used in operating activities was approximately~~In ~~$1.3 and $6.3 million in~~ the ~~Current Period and~~ Prior Period, ~~respectively. Net cash used in operating activities in~~ the ~~Current~~Company ~~Period~~realized ~~principally resulted from the~~ net ~~loss~~cash ~~regognized, in addition to a gain on a securities exchange agreement~~ of approximately $1.74 million~~, offset by non-cash adjustments and~~ ~~increases~~from infinancing ~~accounts~~activities, ~~payable~~gained ~~and~~from ~~accrued~~proceeds ~~liabilities.~~received Wefrom ~~believe~~convertible ~~the impairment~~notes ~~to the working relationships with Hyundai and Apro~~payable, asadvances from a ~~result~~certain ofcorporate ~~the~~officer ~~alleged negligent actions of Hyundai, Apro~~ and ~~others,~~proceeds ~~and~~from the ~~resulting inability to~~release ~~collect receipts on invoices presented to customers, will result in the delay~~ of ~~receipts~~ ofrestricted ~~funds~~cash ~~until such time as the current legal actions are either adjudicated or settled~~accounts. ~~As a result, we have continued to stretch payments to our vendors and employees, have not filed or paid payroll taxes and have had to renegotiate several debt obligations.~~

During the Current Period, the Company used net cash of approximately $0.2 million in investing activities related primarily to our deposits on technology licenses with NASA. In the Prior Period, the Company used net cash of approximately $2.0 million in investing activities related to our investment in Current Technology.18

Leases: The Company currently leases various office spaces under month-to-month leases. There are currently no equipment leases. The Company incurs all costs of insurance, maintenance and utilities.

Financing activities - Debt and Advances:

Debt obligations are summarized as follows:

Instrument	Maturity		Face Amount		~~Face Amount~~	Coupon Interest Rate	Carrying Amount at June 30, 2010, net of discount	~~Coupon Interest Rate~~		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount	~~Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount~~		~~Carrying Amount at June 30, 2008, net of discount~~
6% Notes	Dec. 13, 2009*			1,000,000		~~1,000,000~~15%	$	1,000,000	6	%$ 45,940	$	~~45,940~~	$	~~100~~
6% April Notes	April 4, 2010*			1,000,000		~~1,000,000~~15%		1,000,000	6	%11,630		~~11,630~~		55
8% Debentures	May 21, 2010*			4,000,000		~~4,000,000~~18%		4,000,000	8	%19,891		~~19,891~~		62
8% Notes	May 21, 2010*			4,000,000		~~4,000,000~~18%		4,000,000	8	%4,000,000		~~4,000,000~~		—
Term notes short-term	December 31, 2009					400,000			18	%		400,000		400,000
10% March Notes	March 31, 2011			650,000		10%		3,036		--
Term note short-term	February 28, 2009*					960,000			18	%		960,000		960,000
10% June Notes	June 30, 2011			300,000		10%		500		--
Term note short-term	March 31, 2009*					1,500,000			18	%		1,500,000		1,500,000
Term notes short-term	December 31, 2009*			420,000		18%		420,000		400,000
Term notes short-term	June 17, 2009*					250,000			18	%		250,000		—
Term note short-term	February 28, 2009*			960,000		18%		960,000		960,000
Short term borrowings from Apro Media Corp		N/A				200,000			N/A			206,950		200,000
Term note short-term	March 31, 2009*			1,500,000		18%		1,500,000		1,500,000
Short term borrowings from Current Technologies Corp.		N/A				70,000			N/A			70,000		—
Term notes short-term	June 17, 2009*			250,000		18%		250,000		250,000
Short term borrowings from officer of the Company		N/A				167,062			N/A			167,062		—
Term notes – short terms	August 21, 2009			240,004		30% for loan term + 3% per month		240,004		--
Short term borrowings from others		N/A				60,000			N/A			60,000		—
Short term borrowings from Apro Media Corp	N/A			200,000		N/A		206,950		206,950
					$	13,607,062					$	7,691,473	$	3,060,217
Short term borrowings from Current Technologies Corp.	N/A			70,000		N/A		40,000		70,000
Short term borrowings from officer of the Company	N/A			840,518		N/A		840,518		167,062
Short term borrowings from others	N/A			60,000		N/A		60,000		60,000
			$	15,490,522			$	14,521,008		$7,691,473

* These notes are due on demand.

As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company has the following debt commitments outstanding:

Callable Secured Convertible Note financing

8%March 10 % Notes

On ~~August~~March 2223, ~~2008~~2010, the Company entered into a ~~Securities~~private ~~Exchange~~placement ~~Agreement~~ with ~~Enable~~individual ~~Growth~~institutional ~~Partners,~~investors anand ~~existing~~issued ~~institutional~~secured ~~investor~~convertible ofpromissory ~~MSGI.~~notes Inin ~~connection with~~the ~~that~~aggregate ~~Agreement~~principal amount of $650,000 ~~MSGI~~(the ~~entered~~March ~~into~~Notes) anand 8%stock ~~convertible~~purchase warrants ~~note~~exercisable inover ~~the~~a ~~aggregate principal~~five ~~amount~~year ofperiod $4for up to 6,~~000~~500,000 ~~(the~~shares 8%of common ~~Notes)~~stock.

The 8%March Notes have a maturity date of ~~May~~March 2123, ~~2010~~2011 and will accrue interest at a rate of 810% per annum., ~~Per~~compounded ~~the~~annually. ~~terms~~Payments of principal under the March Notes, are not due until the maturity date and interest is due on a quarterly basis, ~~beginning~~ onhowever ~~October~~the 1,Investors ~~2008. The investors~~ can convert the principal amount of the 8%March Notes into common stock of the Company, provided certain conditions are met, and each conversion is subject to certain volume limitations. The conversion price of the 8 10% March Notes is ~~currently~~$0.10 atper share yielding an aggregate total of possible shares to be issued as a result of conversion of 7,150,000 shares. The exercise price of the Warrants is $0.2515 per share.

The March Notes and warrants contain reset provisions, such that should the Company issue any common share or instrument convertible into any common share at a price lower than the conversion or exercise then in effect than the exercise price and conversion price reset to that lower price.

The Company has also entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”) with the Investors in connection with the closing, which grants security interests in certain assets of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries to the Investors to secure the Company’s obligations under the Notes and Warrants.

In addition, the Company entered into an additional investment rights agreement (the “Additional Investment Right”), which grant each of the Investors the right to purchase additional principal amounts of secured convertible promissory notes equal to the principal amounts purchased in this original transaction. These rights are in effect for a period of up to 180 days after the date of closing of this original transaction. One of the Investors received a due diligence fee comprised of 5 year warrants exercisable for 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. Associated closing costs, legal fees and various reimbursable expenses totaling approximately $81,000 are included in deferred financing costs and will be amortized over the one-year term of the notes.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with these notes was approximately $21,000 and $0, respectively.

June 10% Notes

On June 30, 2010, under the Additional Investments Right agreement, the company issued additional secured convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 (the June Notes) and stock purchase warrants exercisable over a five year period for up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock.

The June Notes have a maturity date of June 30, 2011 and will accrue interest at a rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually. Payments of principal under the June Notes are not due until the maturity date and interest is due on a quarterly basis, however the Investors can convert the principal amount of the March Notes into common stock of the Company, provided certain conditions are met, and each conversion is subject to certain volume limitations. The conversion price of the 10% March Notes is $0.07 per share yielding an aggregate total of possible shares to be issued as a result of conversion of 4,714,285 shares. The exercise price of the Warrants is $0.10 per share.

The June Notes and warrants contain reset provisions, such that should the Company issue any common share or instrument convertible into any common share at a price lower than the conversion or exercise then in effect than the exercise price and conversion price reset to that lower price.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with these notes was approximately $600 and $0, respectively.

8% Debentures

On May 21, 2007, MSGI entered into a private placement with several institutional investors and issued 8% convertible debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000 (the 8% Debentures), of which $4,000,000 is currently outstanding with the remaining principal balance having been converted into shares of common stock during fiscal 2008. ~~There were no conversions during the year ended June 30, 2009.~~

The 8% Debentures have a maturity date of May 21, 2010 and, although technically in default, no such default has been formally claimed by the current holders of the Debentures. The Debentures currently accrue interest at a default rate of 15% per annum and they accrued interest at a rate of 8% per annum through to the date of maturity. Payments of principal and accrued interest under the Debentures are not due until the maturity date. The ~~investors~~conversion ~~can~~price ~~convert~~of the ~~principal~~8% ~~amount~~Debentures ofis currently at $0.25. It is expected that the 8%shares ~~Debentures~~will ~~into~~be ~~common~~issued to ~~stock~~the ofholders sometime during the ~~Company,~~third ~~provided~~quarter ~~certain~~of fiscal year 2011 ending on ~~conditions~~March ~~are~~31, ~~met~~2011, ~~and~~pending ~~each~~approval ~~conversion~~for isan ~~subject~~increase to ~~certain~~the ~~volume~~number of authorized ~~limitations.~~shares ~~The~~of ~~conversion~~common ~~price~~stock ofby ~~the~~a 8%vote ~~Debentures~~of isthe ~~currently~~shareholders atof the $0Company.~~25.~~

InOn March ~~connection~~16, ~~with this debt~~2009, the ~~note~~Company ~~holders~~entered ~~have~~into ~~warrants~~certain ~~for~~convertible ~~the~~promissory ~~purchase~~notes, ~~of up~~which toeffected ~~7,142,852~~the ~~shares of common stock, exercisable over a five~~anti-~~year~~dilution ~~period~~provision ~~at an exercise price~~ of $0these Debentures.~~50. These~~ ~~warrants~~The ~~can~~conversion ~~be exchanged by the~~price ~~holder for shares~~ of ~~common stock of~~ the ~~Company~~Debentures ~~per~~was ~~the~~reduced ~~Warrant~~from ~~Exchange Agreement dated March 16, 2009~~$0.50 ~~The shares will be issued~~ to ~~the holders of the exchanged warrants over time~~$0.25.

2620

The Company allocated the aggregate proceeds of the 8% Debentures between the warrants and the Debentures based on their fair value and calculated a beneficial conversion feature and warrant discount in an amount in excess of the $5 million in proceeds received. Therefore, the total discount was limited to $5 million. The discount on the Debentures was allocated from the gross proceeds and recorded as additional paid-in capital. The discount is being amortized to interest expense over the three-year maturity date. Should the 8% Debentures be converted or paid prior to the payment terms, the amortization of the discount will be accelerated. On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these Debentures. The conversion price of the Debentures was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25. No additional beneficial conversion expense was recorded related to the conversion price change due to the immaterial effect of this adjustment to the financial results of the Company as of June 30, 2009.

The 8% Debentures and the Warrants have anti-dilution protections. The Company has also entered into a Security Agreement with the investors in connection with the closing, which grants security interests in certain assets of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries to the investors to secure the Company’s obligations under the 8% Debentures and Warrants.

6%The holders ~~Notes~~agreed to waive certain provisions in the debentures and warrants, specifically those pertaining to cross default and the ability of the conversion price and exercise price of the debentures and warrants, respectively, to reset based on future equity issuances. The waivers covered the entire year ended June 30, 2010 and the Company obtained a further waiver through October 1, 2010.

On ~~December~~October 1318, ~~2006~~2010, ~~pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement between~~ the Company ~~and~~announced ~~several~~that ~~institutional~~it ~~investors,~~had ~~MSGI~~entered ~~issued~~into ~~$2,000,000~~a ~~aggregate~~strategic ~~principal~~Partnership ~~amount~~with ofAttonbitus ~~Callable~~Development ~~Secured~~Inc. ~~Convertible~~As ~~Notes~~part ~~(the~~of 6%this ~~Notes) and stock~~relationship, ~~purchase~~Attonbitus ~~warrants~~agreed ~~exercisable~~to ~~for~~purchase ~~3,000,000~~all ~~shares~~ of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~8% inDebentures aprincipal ~~private~~and accrued ~~placement~~interest ~~for~~with anthe ~~aggregate~~intent ~~offering~~to ~~price~~convert ofthe ~~$2,000,000,~~value of ~~which $1,000,000 is currently outstanding with~~ the ~~remaining~~debt ~~principal~~into ~~balance~~a ~~having~~series ~~been converted~~of ~~into~~investments ~~shares~~in ofvarious ~~common~~MSGI ~~stock~~operating ~~during~~subsidiaries, ~~fiscal~~primarily ~~2008. There~~those ~~were no~~subsidiaries ~~conversions~~related ~~during~~to the ~~year~~NASA ~~ended June 30, 2009~~technologies.

~~The 6%~~Total ~~Notes~~interest ~~have a single balloon payment of $1~~expense,~~000,000~~ ~~due~~including ondebt ~~the~~discount ~~maturity date of December 13~~amortization, ~~2009~~for ~~and will accrue interest at a rate of 6% per annum. The Investors can convert~~ the ~~principal~~twelve ~~amount of the 6% Notes~~months ~~into~~ended ~~common~~June ~~stock of the Company~~30, ~~provided~~2010 ~~certain conditions are met,~~ and ~~each conversion~~2009 is subject to certain volume limitations. The conversion price of the 6% Notes is currently at $0.25. The payment obligations under the Notes accelerate if payments under the Notes are not made when due or upon the occurrence of other defaults described in ~~the~~connection ~~Notes. The warrants~~with ~~are~~this ~~exercisable~~note ~~through~~was ~~December~~approximately ~~2013. The exercise price of the warrants is~~ $04.~~50 per share. These warrants can be exchanged by the holder~~4 ~~for~~million ~~shares of common stock of the company per the Warrant Exchange Agreement dated March 16, 2009. The shares will be issued to the holders of the exchanged warrants over time~~ and ~~an aggregate of 500~~$594,000 ~~shares have been issued under this agreement as of June 30~~, ~~2009~~respectively.

~~The 6~~8% ~~Notes~~ and the warrants have anti-dilution protections. The Company has also entered into a Security Agreement and an Intellectual Property Security Agreement with the Investors in connection with the closing, which grants security interests in certain assets of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries to the Investors to secure the Company’s obligations under the 6% Notes ~~and warrants.~~

~~The~~On August ~~Company~~22, ~~allocated~~2008, the ~~aggregate~~Company ~~proceeds~~entered ofinto ~~the~~a 6%Securities ~~Notes~~Exchange ~~between~~Agreement ~~the~~with ~~warrants~~Enable ~~and~~Growth ~~the~~Partners, ~~Notes based on their fair values and calculated a beneficial conversion feature and warrant discount in~~ an ~~amount~~existing ininstitutional ~~excess~~investor of ~~the $1 million in proceeds received~~MSGI. ~~Therefore, the total discount was limited to $1 million. The~~ In ~~Company~~connection iswith ~~amortizing~~that ~~this~~Agreement, ~~discount~~MSGI ~~over~~entered ~~the~~into ~~remaining~~an ~~term of the 6~~8% ~~Notes through~~convertible ~~December~~note ~~2009.~~in ~~Should~~ the ~~6% Notes be converted or paid prior to the~~ ~~payment~~aggregate ~~terms,~~principal ~~the~~amount ~~amortization~~ of ~~the discount will be accelerated. On March 16~~$4, ~~2009~~000,000 (the ~~Company~~8% ~~entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these~~ Notes). The conversion price of the Notes was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25. No additional beneficial conversion expense was recorded related to the conversion price change due to the immaterial effect of this adjustment to the financial results of the Company as of June 30, 2009.

The 8% Notes have a maturity date of May 21, 2010 and are currently technically in default, although no such default has been formally claimed by the current holders. The notes accrued interest at a rate of 8% per annum through to the maturity date and shall accrue interest at the default rate of 15% per annum thereafter. The conversion price of the 8% Notes is currently at $0.25. It is expected that the shares will be issued to the holders sometime during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 ending on March 31, 2011, pending approval for an increase to the number of authorized shares of common stock by a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

The note holders agreed to waive certain provisions in the notes and warrants, specifically those pertaining to cross default and the ability of the conversion price and exercise price of the notes and warrants, respectively, to reset based on future equity issuances. The waivers covered the entire year ended June 30, 2010 and the Company obtained a further waiver through October 1, 2010.

On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 8% Notes principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $327,000 and $274,000, respectively.

6% December Notes

On December 13, 2006, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and several institutional investors, MSGI issued $2,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Callable Secured Convertible Notes (the 6% Notes) and stock purchase warrants exercisable for 3,000,000 shares of common stock in a private placement for an aggregate offering price of $2,000,000, of which $1,000,000 is currently outstanding with the remaining principal balance having been converted into shares of common stock during fiscal 2008. There were no conversions during fiscal 2010 fiscal 2009.

The 6% Notes have a single balloon payment of $1,000,000, which was due on the maturity date of December 13, 2009 and accrued interest at a rate of 6% per annum. The 6% Notes are currently earning a default interest rate of 15% per annum. The conversion price of the 6% Notes is currently at $0.25. It is expected that the shares will be issued to the holders sometime during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 ending on March 31, 2011, pending approval for an increase to the number of authorized shares of common stock by a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

The 6% Notes anti-dilution protections. The Company has also entered into a Security Agreement and an Intellectual Property Security Agreement in connection with the original closing, which grants security interests in certain assets of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries to the holders of the notes to secure the Company’s obligations under the 6% Notes and warrants.

On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these Notes. The conversion price of the Notes was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25.

On October 3, 2007, a $1.0 million portion of the Notes outstanding were purchased by certain third-party institutional investors, from the original note holders. The Company did not receive any cash as a result of these transactions and was not a party to the transaction. These institutional investors converted $1.0 million of the note balance as well as interest expense of $40,086 into an aggregate of 2,080,172 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, as part of the conversion transaction, the Company allowed the note holders to convert at a rate of $0.50, which was lower than the stated conversion price under the note agreement.

On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 6% Notes principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $1,088,000 and $166,000, respectively.

6% April Notes

On April 5, 2007, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and several institutional investors, MSGI issued $1.0 million aggregate principal amount of Callable Secured Convertible Notes (the 6% April Notes) and stock purchase warrants exercisable for 1,500,000 shares of common stock in a private placement for an aggregate offering price of $1.0 million. The ~~warrants~~6% ~~have~~April anNotes ~~exercise~~have ~~price~~a single balloon payment of $1.000 ~~and~~million ~~are~~which ~~exercisable~~was ~~for~~due aon ~~term~~the maturity date of 7April ~~years~~4, 2010. These ~~warrants~~ ~~can~~notes beaccrued ~~exchanged~~interest byat ~~the~~a ~~holder~~rate ~~for shares~~ of ~~common~~6% ~~stock~~per ofannum ~~the~~through ~~company per~~ the ~~Warrant~~maturity ~~Exchange~~date. ~~Agreement~~Although ~~dated~~the ~~March~~notes ~~16,~~are ~~2009.~~technically ~~The~~in ~~shares~~default ~~will be~~as ~~issued~~of toApril ~~the~~4, 2010, ~~holders~~no ofsuch ~~the~~default ~~exchanged~~has ~~warrants~~been ~~over~~formally ~~time~~claimed ~~and~~by anthe ~~aggregate~~current ofholders. The ~~500,000~~notes ~~shares~~currently ~~have~~earn ~~been~~interest ~~issued~~at ~~under~~the ~~this~~default ~~agreement~~rate as of ~~June~~15% ~~30, 2009~~per annum.

The conversion price of the 6% April Notes ~~have~~is acurrently ~~single~~at ~~balloon payment of~~ $1.0.25. ~~million~~It ~~due~~is onexpected that the ~~maturity date~~shares ofwill ~~April~~be 4,issued ~~2010~~to ~~and~~the ~~will~~holders ~~accrue~~sometime ~~interest~~during atthe athird ~~rate~~ quarter of 6%fiscal ~~per annum. The~~year ~~Investors~~2011 ~~can~~ending ~~convert~~on ~~the~~March ~~principal~~31, ~~amount~~2011, ofpending ~~the~~approval 6%for ~~April~~an increase ~~Notes~~to ~~into~~the ~~common~~number ~~stock~~ of ~~the~~authorized ~~Company,~~shares ~~provided~~of ~~certain~~common ~~conditions~~stock ~~are~~by ~~met,~~a ~~and each~~vote ~~conversion~~of isthe ~~subject to certain volume limitations. The~~shareholders ~~conversion price~~ of the ~~6% April Notes is currently $0~~Company.~~25.~~

~~The~~As a ~~Company~~result ~~allocated the aggregate proceeds~~ of ~~the 6% April Notes between the warrants and the Notes based on their fair values and calculated~~ a ~~beneficial~~ conversion ~~feature~~transaction ~~and warrant discount in an amount in excess~~ of the $1Callable ~~million in~~Secured ~~proceeds~~Convertible ~~received. Therefore, the total discount was limited to $1 million. The Company is amortizing this discount to interest expense over the remaining term of the 6~~8% ~~April~~ Notes ~~through April~~ ~~2010. Should~~and the 6% ~~April~~ Notes be converted ~~or paid prior to the payment terms~~above, ~~the amortization of the discount will be accelerated. On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the~~ anti-dilution ~~provision~~provisions of ~~these~~the April 6% Notes were triggered. The conversion price of the April 6% Notes was reduced from ~~$0.50 to $0.25. No additional beneficial~~a ~~conversion~~variable ~~expense was recorded related to the~~ conversion ~~price~~rate ~~change~~noted ~~due~~above to ~~the~~ ~~immaterial~~a ~~effect~~fixed ofrate ~~this adjustment to the financial results~~ of ~~the Company as of June 30, 2009~~$0.50.

27On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these April Notes. The conversion price of the April Notes was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25.

The payment obligation under the April Notes may accelerate if payments under the April Notes are not made when due or upon the occurrence of other defaults described in the April Notes.

The 6% April Notes and the warrants have anti-dilution protections. The Company has also entered into a Security Agreement and an Intellectual Property Security Agreement with the Investors in connection with the closing, which grants security interests in certain assets of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries to the Investors to secure the Company’s obligations under the 6% April Notes and warrants.

On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 6% April Notes principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $1,092,000 and $124,000, respectively.

Convertible Term Notes payable

On December 13, 2007, the Company entered into four short-term notes with private institutional lenders. These promissory notes provided proceeds totaling $2.86 million to the Company. The proceeds of these notes were used to purchase inventory ~~associated with the Apro transactions~~. The notes carry a variable rate of interest based on the prime rate plus two percent. These notes had an original maturity date of April 15, 2008. During February 2010, one of the lenders extended an additional $20,000 to the Company with this amount being added to the already then outstanding balance of one of the existing notes. These notes were not repaid on this date and the terms were amended at several different dates to extend them to ~~their~~ ~~current~~ maturity dates of February 28, 2009 ~~for one note~~, March 31, 2009 ~~for~~, ~~one note~~ and December 31, 2009 ~~for the remaining two notes~~. While ~~two~~the notes payable are technically in default at this time, neither of the lenders have claimed default on the notes ~~and the Company is presently in discussions with these lenders regarding extended terms for these notes payable~~. ~~There are no guarantees that the Company will successfully execute the proposed addendum extensions with the various lenders.~~

Between April 30, 2008 and April 1, 2009, the Company executed a series of Amendments to the Term Notes, which extended the payment terms for the term notes through February 28, 2009 for one lender, March 31, 2009 for aone ~~second~~ lender, and ~~December~~ December 31, 2009 for the remaining two lenders. Due to the default event, commencing on April 15, 2008, the interest rate is now at the default interest rate of 18% ~~on all four notes~~. Also, two of the holders now have the right to convert the ~~their~~note ~~notes~~ at a rate of $0.51 per share, ~~while~~and the ~~remaining~~ other two holders have athe right to convert ~~their~~the ~~notes~~note at a rate of $0.25 per share.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company entered into additional addendum agreements with three out of four lenders with regard to their respectively held Notes, which issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock and extended the maturity date to March 31, 2009. The Company issued an additional 204,420 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 204,420 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.50 or market value on the date of grant. Effective February 1, 2009, the Company entered into an ~~additional~~ additional addendum agreement with the fourth lender with regard to its held Note, which issued 400,000 shares of common stock to the lender and extended the ~~maturity~~ maturity date of this Note to February 28, 2009. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company entered into additional addendum agreements with two out of four lenders with regard to their respectively held Notes, which issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock and extended the maturity date to December 31, 2009. The Company issued an additional 221,195 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 221,195 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.25 or market value on the date of the grant for the period April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009.

2823

~~Effective~~During ~~April~~the 1twelve months ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~92,400 ~~additional~~warrants ~~addendum~~at ~~agreements with two~~an ~~out~~exercise price of ~~four~~$0.25 ~~lenders~~and ~~with regard to their respectively held Notes~~92,400 ~~which issued new warrants and additional~~ shares of common stock. The ~~and~~stock was ~~extended~~determined ~~the~~to ~~maturity date~~have toa ~~December~~fair 31value of $7,707, ~~2009. The~~based ~~Company~~upon ~~issued~~the anfair ~~additional~~market ~~221,195~~value ~~shares~~ of the common stock ~~and~~on ~~warrants~~each todate ~~purchase~~issued. The anwarrants ~~additional~~were ~~221,195 shares of~~determined ~~common~~to ~~stock,~~have ata anvalue ~~exercise price~~ of ~~the~~$6,953. ~~greater~~The ofwarrants ~~$0.25~~were orfair ~~market~~valued, ~~value~~at oneach warrant ~~the~~issuance, ~~date~~using of the ~~grant~~Black-Scholes model.

~~The net~~In ~~effect~~February of2010, ~~all of~~ the ~~addendums~~exercise toprice ~~these~~of ~~term~~326,486 ~~notes~~of ~~during~~ the ~~year~~previously ~~ended~~issued ~~June~~warrants ~~30, 2009,~~ was ~~the~~further ~~issuance~~reduced ~~of 1,055,615 warrants at an exercise prices ranging~~ from $0.25 toper ~~$0.50 and 1,984,186~~ shares ~~of common stock. The stock was determined~~ to ~~have a fair value of~~ $~~420,749~~0.15 ~~for~~per ~~the~~share ~~year~~as ~~ended~~an ~~June~~incentive ~~30,~~for ~~2009,~~one ~~based upon the fair market value~~ of the ~~common~~lenders ~~stock on each date issued. The warrants were determined~~ to ~~have~~provide athe ~~value~~Company ofwith ~~$44,987, which includes~~ an ~~offset~~additional ~~of the value of the cancelled warrants previously recorded. The warrants were fair valued~~$20,000 ~~at each warrant issuance, using the~~in ~~Black-Scholes model~~cash. ~~The warrant and stock values were recorded as additional interest expense on the note during the year ended June 30, 2009.~~

During March 2010, the holders certain of these convertible promissory notes provided the Company with letters of agreement that the various notes shall be extinguished and that the principal balances of these notes of approximately $1.9 million, plus any and all accrued interest thereon, would be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at an exchange rate of $0.20 per share. Further, it was agreed that these shares will be locked up and will not be eligible for trading until at least December 31, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the exchange shares have not been issued to the lenders by the Company and the notes will remain reported as debt until such time as said shares are issued. It is expected that the shares will be issued to the lenders sometime during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 ending on March 31, 2011, pending approval for an increase to the number of authorized shares of common stock by a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

10% Convertible Term Notes payable

On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into three convertible promissory notes with Enable which provided the Company with gross proceeds of $250,000. The notes bear interest at a rate of 10% annually and are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.25 per share. The notes had a maturity date of June 17, 2009. As an inducement to Enable to enter into the Convertible Term Notes, the Company entered into a Warrant Exchange Agreement with Enable. The remaining terms of the 10% notes carry the same provisions as the 8% Debentures. ~~Although~~Due to the ~~note is technically in~~ default asevent, ofcommencing on June 3017, 2009, the ~~lender~~interest ~~has~~rate ~~not~~is ~~made~~now aat ~~claim~~the of default ~~and~~rate ~~the~~of ~~Company~~18%. While isthe ~~currently~~notes inare ~~negotiations~~technically ~~for~~in andefault ~~extension~~at toJune ~~the~~30, ~~terms~~2010, of the ~~note.~~ ~~There~~lender ~~can~~has bemade no ~~guarantee~~claim ~~that~~of ~~the Company will be successful in securing such extension~~default.

On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 10% Notes principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

25% Convertible Term Notes payable

In July 2009, the Company executed a NASA Funding Promissory Note in the amount of $240,004 with a lender who also holds a promissory note from December 2007. The new promissory note was executed in order to enable the Company to meet its obligations under a certain Space Act Agreement, which had been entered into with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The note bears interest at 25% and matured on August 30, 2009. In addition, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to the lender as additional consideration to enter into the note agreement. The shares were issued to the lender in September 2009. As of June 30, 2010, and through the date of this filing, the principal balance and accrued interest has not yet been paid to the lender. Although the note is technically in default as of the date of this filing, the lender has not made any claim of default.

Advances

During the ~~year~~twelve months ended June 30, ~~2008~~2010, the Company received net funding in the amount of approximately $~~200~~678,000 from ~~Apro~~a ~~Media~~certain corporate officer. ~~These~~During ~~funds~~the year ~~were~~ended ~~advanced~~June to30, 2009, the Company ~~against expected~~received ~~collections~~net offunding ~~accounts~~in ~~receivable~~the ~~generated~~amount ~~under~~of approximately ~~the~~$162,000 ~~Apro sub-contract~~from ~~agreement.~~this ~~During~~same ~~the~~corporate ~~year~~officer. As ~~ended~~of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the ~~Company received~~total annet ~~additional~~amount ~~$6,950~~received from ~~Apro Media, bringing~~ the ~~aggregate~~officer tois approximately $~~206~~841,~~950~~000. There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid toupon ~~Apro~~the closing of any adequately successful funding event or upon the collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred. It is also noted by the Company that this certain corporate officer is owed approximately $697,000 in back due compensation as of the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.

Summary of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~In June~~See ~~2009,~~summary ~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy~~ of ~~Generally~~our ~~Accepted Accounting~~recent ~~Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162". SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative~~ accounting ~~principles~~pronouncements ~~and the framework for selecting the principles used~~ in the ~~preparation~~footnotes ofto our financial statements ofelsewhere ~~nongovernmental entities that are presented~~ in ~~conformity~~this ~~with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States~~document. ~~This SFAS is effective for the Company's interim reporting period ending on September 30, 2009, and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.~~

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, "Subsequent Events". SFAS 165 establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued and was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have an impact on the Company's financial statements. The Company evaluated all subsequent events that occurred from July 1, 2009 through October 13, 2009, and disclosed all material subsequent events in Note 19.24

In April 2009, FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly". FSP SFAS No. 157-4 provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The FSP relates to determining fair values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It reaffirms what SFAS No. 157 states is the objective of fair value measurement-to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. The FSP is effective for the Company's annual reporting for the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2009. The implementation of FSP SFAS No. 157-4 did not materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments". FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 enhances consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. The FSP relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected a company's balance sheet at fair value. Prior to the effective date of this FSP, fair values for these assets and liabilities have only been disclosed once a year. The FSP will now require these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. The disclosure requirement under this FSP is effective for the Company's interim reporting period ending on September 30, 2009.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-3, "Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active". FSP SFAS No. 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, which the Company adopted with respect to financial assets and liabilities as of July 1, 2008. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 for its non-financial assets and liabilities beginning July 1, 2009. The Company has considered the guidance provided by FSP SFAS No. 157-3 in its determination of estimated fair values, and the impact was not material.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock" (EITF 07-5). Equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that otherwise meet the definition of a derivative as outlined in SFAS No. 133, " Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, " are not accounted for as derivatives if certain criteria are met, one of which is that the instrument (or embedded feature) must be indexed to the entity's stock. EITF 07-5 provides guidance on determining if equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) such as warrants to purchase our stock are considered indexed to our stock. EITF 07-5 is effective for the Company in its fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009 and will be applied to outstanding instruments as of that date. Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment will be recorded, if necessary, based on amounts that would have been recognized if this guidance had been applied from the issuance date of the affected instruments. Initial adoption of EITF 07-5 is not expected to materially impact the Company's financial statements. However, future movements of our stock price alone could materially affect both our results of operations and financial position in the future. Substantial movements in our stock price could result in material volatility in our results of operations and financial position as under this pronouncement we could be required to report obligations and expense in our financial statements that will never be settled in cash.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). " FSP APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon either mandatory or optional conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, " Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. " Additionally, FSP APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity's nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for the Company in its fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009, and must be applied on a retrospective basis. Adoption of the guidance provided by FSP APB 14-1 is not expected to materially impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB adopted FSP SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, amending the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . This FSP is effective for intangible assets acquired on or after July 1, 2009. This SFAS is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In February 2008, the FASB adopted FSP SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,delaying the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the implementation of the deferred portion of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

3125

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

~~Report~~REPORT OF ofINDEPENDENT ~~Independent~~REGISTERED ~~Registered~~PUBLIC ~~Public~~ACCOUNTING ~~Accounting Firm~~FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

~~MSGI~~ of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. ~~and Subsidiaries~~ as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ ~~equity (~~deficit), and cash flows for ~~each~~ of the years then ended. ~~These~~ ~~financial statements are the~~MSGI ~~responsibility~~Security ofSolutions, ~~the Company~~Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our ~~audit~~audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The ~~Company~~company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the ~~Company~~company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the ~~overall~~ overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. ~~and Subsidiaries~~ as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, and negative cash flows from operations, and has a substantial amount of notes payable due on demand or within the next twelve months and has very limited capital resources, all of which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ ~~Amper~~ L J Soldinger Associates, ~~Politziner~~LLC &L ~~Mattia~~J Soldinger Associates, ~~LLP~~LLC Deer Park, Illinois November 15, 2010

~~October 13, 2009~~26

Edison, New Jersey

MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30,

	2009			2008
	2010			2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	~~689~~160,656		$	~~150,624~~689
Restricted cash		-			1,800,000
Other current assets, principally deferred financing costs, net		244,400			-
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $60,000		-			128,000
Total current assets		405,056			689
Costs of product shipped to customers for which revenues have not yet been recognized, net of reserve of $5,416,616 and $1,349,970, respectively (see Note 2)		-			4,066,646
Investment in Current Technology Corporation		300,000			1,500,000
Total current assets		689			6,145,270
Property and equipment, net		19,419			32,299
Investment in Current Technology Corporation (see Note 5)		1,500,000			2,000,000
Deposits on technology licenses		-			175,000
Property and equipment, net		32,299			30,946
Other assets, principally long term deposits		17,755			338,223
Deposits on technology licenses (see Note 4)		175,000			-
Total assets	$	742,230		$	2,046,211
Other assets, principally deferred financing costs, net		338,223			894,006
Total assets	$	2,046,211		$	9,070,222
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - trade	$	21,~~723~~206,~~392~~719		$	21,~~572~~313,~~471~~059
Convertible term notes payable		2,860,000			2,860,000
Derivative liability for excess shares		3,170,374			-
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		4,684,192			2,755,588
Liability for RFMon settlement		1,430,333			1,430,333
Advances from strategic partners		276,950			200,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		6,664,938			4,664,192
Advances from corporate officer		167,062			-
Advances from strategic partners		246,950			276,950
Other advances		60,000			-
Advances from corporate officer		840,518			167,062
10% Convertible promissory note payable		250,000			-
Other advances		60,000			60,000
6% Callable convertible notes payable, net of discount of $1,942,430 as of 2009		57,570			-
Convertible term notes payable		3,120,004			2,860,000
8% Callable convertible notes payable net of discount of $3,980,109 as of 2009		4,019,891			-
10% Convertible promissory note payable		250,000			250,000
Accrued liability for put options		-			6,550,000
6% Callable convertible notes payable, net of discount of $1,942,430 in 2009		2,000,000			57,570
Total current liabilities		15,099,057			14,938,059
8% Callable convertible notes payable net of discount of $3,980,109 in 2009		8,000,000			4,019,891
8% Callable convertible notes payable, net of discount of $3,999,938 as of 2008		-			62
10% Callable convertible notes payable, net of discount of $946,464 in 2010		3,536			-
6% Callable convertible notes payable, net of discount of $1,999,845 as of 2008		-			155
Total current liabilities		26,993,372			15,099,057
Total liabilities		15,099,057			14,938,276
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Convertible preferred stock - $.01 par value; 0 shares at June 30, 2009 and 5,000,000 shares at June 30, 2008 of Series H issued and outstanding		-			50,000
Common stock - $.01 par value; 100,000,000 authorized; 73,692,033 and 24,932,967 shares issued; 73,674,371 and 24,915,305 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively		736,919			249,329
Common stock - $.01 par value; 100,000,000 authorized; 24,932,967 and 22,348,781 shares issued; 24,915,305 and 22,331,119 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively		249,329			223,487
Additional paid-in capital		271,743,167			272,057,383
Additional paid-in capital		272,057,383			271,243,011
Accumulated deficit		(297,337,518	)		(283,965,848	)
Accumulated deficit		(283,965,848	)		(275,990,842	)
Less: 17,662 shares of common stock in treasury, at cost		(1,393,710	)		(1,393,710	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(1326,~~052~~251,~~846~~142	)		(513,~~868~~052,~~054~~846	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	2742,~~046,211~~230		$	92,~~070~~046,~~222~~211

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3327

MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,

	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Revenue
Product Revenue – Apro subcontract	$	-		$	3,816,560
Consulting fee revenue	$	-		$	282,000
Referral fee revenue		-			100,000
Total revenue		-			282,000
Consulting fee revenue		282,000			128,000
Cost of revenue / products sold, including write down of $4,066,646 in 2009		-			4,066,646
Total revenue		282,000			4,044,560
Gross loss		(-	)		(3,784,646	)
Cost of revenue / products sold, including write down of $4,066,646 in 2009 and $1,349,970 in 2008		4,066,646			4,194,327
Gross loss		(3,784,646	)		(149,767	)
Operating costs and expenses:
Salaries and benefits		1693,~~121,734~~967			21,~~307~~121,~~067~~734
Research and development		-760,004			~~88,200~~-
Selling, general and administrative (including non-cash credit of $(62,336) in 2009 and expense of $1,052,336 in 2008 for shares to be issued to Apro Media)		1,392,832			4,471,929
Selling, general and administrative (including non-cash credit of $(62,336) in 2009 for shares to be issued to Apro Media		3,861,666			1,392,832
Depreciation and amortization		1412,~~760~~880			2614,~~953~~760
Total operating costs and expenses		25,~~529~~328,~~326~~517			62,~~894~~529,~~149~~326
Loss from operations		(65,~~313~~328,~~972~~517	)		(76,~~043~~313,~~916~~972	)
Other income (expense):
Interest income		~~13,124~~-			513,~~861~~124
Interest expense		(29,~~707~~242,~~501~~483	)		(112,~~584~~707,~~299~~501	)
Non-cash expense for revaluation of put options to fair value		(150,000	)		(1,550,000	)
Loss on investment in Current Technology Corp.		(1,200,000	)		-
Non-cash loss on debt guarantee		(500,000	)		-
Gain on change in derivative liability		2,412,506			-
Gain on put options		1,700,000			-
Miscellaneous income		10,824			-
Total other income (expense)		(1,644,377	)		(13,128,438	)
Non-cash expense for revaluation of put options to fair value		-			(150,000	)
Loss before provision for income taxes		(7,958,349	)		(20,172,354	)
Non-cash loss on debt guarantee		-			(500,000	)
Provision for income taxes		16,657			6,000
Gain on put options		-			1,700,000
Net loss	$	(7,975,006	)	$	(20,178,354	)
Total other income (expense)		(8,019,153	)		(1,644,377	)
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.34	)	$	(1.19	)
Net loss from before provision for income taxes		(13,347,670	)		(7,958,349	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted		23,665,256			17,016,261
Provision for income taxes		24,000			16,657
Net loss attributable to common stockholders		(13,371,670	)		(7,975,006	)
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.34	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted		50,421,250			23,665,256

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3428

MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ ~~EQUITY (~~DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, ~~2009~~2010 AND ~~2008~~2009

					Additional
	Common Stock				Additional Preferred Stock						Paid-in			Accumulated			Treasury Stock
	Common Stock				Preferred Stock						Paid-in			Accumulated			Treasury Stock
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Shares			Amount			Totals
Balance June 30, 2007		10,325,687	$	103,257		-		$	-		$	256,074,720		$	(255,812,488	)		(17,662	)	$	(1,393,710	)	$	(1,028,221	)
Issuance of convertible preferred Series H shares (see Note 13)						5,000,000			50,000			(50,000	)											-
Non-cash compensation expense												485,570												485,570
Issuance of shares of common stock to members of the Board of Directors		91,965		920								192,209												193,129
Issuance of shares of common stock to investor relations firms		300,000		3,000								201,000												204,000
8% and 6% convertible debt and accrued interest converted to shares of common stock		10,111,129		101,110								6,599,177												6,700,287
Issuance of shares of common stock to Apro Media Corp. pursuant to subcontract agreement		1,000,000		10,000								980,000												990,000
Charge related to modification to exercise price of warrants previously issued												4,969,008												4,969,008
Debt discount for warrants issued in connection with December 2007 notes												80,208												80,208
Fair value of warrants issued to investor relations firms for services rendered												332,421												332,421
Additional debt discount recorded in connection with reset of conversion price under anti-dilution provisions of convertible debt												1,077,993												1,077,993
Fair value of warrants issued under Addendums to term notes payable												83,105												83,105
Issuance of shares of common stock under Addendum to term notes payable		520,000		5,200								217,600												222,800
Net Loss															(20,178,354	)								(20,178,354	)
Balance June 30, 2008		22,348,781	$	223,487		5,000,000		$	50,000		$	271,243,011		$	(275,990,842	)		(17,662	)	$	(1,393,710	)	$	(5,868,054	)
Exchange of preferred stock for debt in Securities Exchange Agreement						(5,000,000	)		(50,000	)		50,000												-—
Issuance of shares of common stock under Securities Exchange Agreement		500,000		5,000								35,000												40,000
Non cash compensation expense												221,478												221,478
Issuance of shares of common stock to Officer as a bonus		100,000		1,000								62,000												63,000
Issuance of shares of common stock under Addendum to term notes payable		1,984,186		19,842								400,907												420,749
Fair value of warrants issued under Addendum to term notes payable												44,987												44,987
Net loss												~~(7,975,006~~	)		(7,975,006	)								(7,975,006	)
Balance June 30, 2009		24,932,967	$	249,329		—		$	—		$	272,057,383		$	(283,965,848	)		(17,662	)	$	(1,393,710	)	$	(13,052,846	)
Exchange of shares of common stock for warrants in Exchange Agreement		9,500,000		95,000								1,090,000												1,185,000
Non-cash compensation expenses												4,573												4,573
Issuance of shares under terms of various consulting and services agreements		37,666,666		376,666								2,827,384												3,204,050
Issuance of shares for debt guarantee		1,000,000		10,000								160,000												170,000
Issuance of shares under terms of a certain loan agreement		500,000		5,000								15,000												20,000
Issuance of shares under addendum to term notes payable		92,400		924								6,783												7,707
Fair value of warrants issued to placement agents in March 2010 financing												79,219												79,219
Discount on convertible notes issued in March and June 2010												950,000												950,000
Fair value of warrants issued to consultants												128,752												128,752
Fair value of warrants issued under terms of addendum to term notes payable												6,953												6,953
Derivative value of shares of common stock committed in excess of authorized total												(5,582,880	)											(5,582,880	)
Net loss for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010															(13,371,670	)								(13,371,670	)
Balance June 30, 2010		73,692,033	$	736,919		—			—		$	271,743,167		$	(297,337,518	)		(17,662	)	$	(1,393,710	)	$	(26,251,142	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3529

MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,

	2009			2008
	2010			2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(713,~~975~~371,~~006~~670	)	$	(207,~~178~~975,~~354~~006	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts - CODA		-			60,000
Gain on securities exchange agreement		-			(1,700,000	)
Gain on put options		(1,700,000	)		-
Depreciation		12,880			14,760
Depreciation		14,760			14,340
Loss on impairment of investment		1,200,000			-
Amortization		-			12,613
Amortization of deferred financing costs		348,361			581,538
Amortization of deferred financing costs		581,538			774,869
Amortization of debt discounts		5,947,861			867,980
Non-cash compensation expense		~~233~~4,~~278~~573			~~516~~233,~~153~~278
Non-cash expense for revaluation of put options		~~150,000~~-			1150,~~550,~~000
Non-cash interest expense		867,980			9,763,795
Non-cash loss on guarantee of debt		-			500,000
Non-cash expense (credit) for shares to be issued to Apro Media		~~(62,336~~-	)		1(62,~~052,~~336	)
Reserve on deferred costs of products shipped		4,066,646			1,349,970
Non-cash value of shares issued to lenders		996,702			-
Non-cash expense for shares and warrants issued for services		-			536,421
Non-cash value of warrants issued in financings		86,172			-
Non-cash loss on guarantee of debt		500,000			-
Non-cash value of shares issued for services		3,204,050			-
Non-cash value of warrants issued for services		128,752			-
Gain on change in derivative liability		(2,412,506	)		-
Reserve on deferred costs of products shipped		-			4,066,646
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		~~128,000~~-			~~(188~~128,000	)
Inventory		-			(288,170	)
Other current assets		(37,500	)		-
Cost of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not yet been recognized		-			(4,066,646	)
Other assets		110,176			(5,755	)
Other current assets		-			9,250
Accounts payable - trade		(109,340	)		150,921
Other assets		(5,755	)		(24,304	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,288,746			1,737,140
Accounts payable - trade		150,921			990,092
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,602,743	)		(1,312,834	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,737,140			1,798,301
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(1,312,834	)		(6,317,334	)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment in Current Technologies Corporation		-			(2,000,000	)
Deposits on technology contracts		-			(175,000	)
Deposits on technology licenses		(175,000	)		-
Purchases of property and equipment		-			(16,113	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(16,113	)		(25,733	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		-			(191,113	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(191,113	)		(2,025,733	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the issuance convertible term notes		-			2,860,000
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes		1,210,004			250,000
Proceeds from the issuance of Series H Preferred Stock		-			5,000,000
Closing costs paid from proceeds of notes		(90,750	)		-
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes		250,000			-
Cash advances from strategic partners, officers and others		643,456			304,012
Restricted Cash proceeds (deposits)		~~1,800,000~~-			(1,800,000	)
Cash paid from restricted cash in securities exchange agreement		~~(1,000,000~~-	)		-(1,000,000	)
Cash advances from strategic partners, officers and others		304,012			200,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,762,710			1,354,012
Financing costs related to Preferred Shares and Put Options		-			(230,000	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		159,967			(149,935	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,354,012			6,030,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		689			150,624
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(149,935	)		(2,313,067	)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	160,656		$	689
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		150,624			2,463,691
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	689		$	150,624
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid:
Interest	$	-		$	20,326
Taxes	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~See Note 19 for further supplemental cash flow information.~~30

MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. LIQUIDITY AND COMPANY OVERVIEW:

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

Historically, the Company has funded its operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions primarily through private placements of equity and debt. The Company currently has limited capital resources, has incurred significant historical losses and has negative cash flows from operations and has minimal current period revenues. At June 30, 2009, the Company had $689 in cash and no accounts receivable. The Company believes that funds on hand combined with funds that will be available from its various operations will not be adequate to finance its operations requirements and enable the Company to meet its financial obligations and payments under its convertible notes and promissory notes for the next twelve months. Certain promissory notes in the amount of $960,000 were due February 28, 2009, $1,500,000 were due March 31, 2009 and $250,000 were due on June 17, 2009. These notes are technically in default as of the date of this filing, but none of the lenders have made a claim of default and the Company is in the process of negotiating extended terms for each of the debt instruments. Other promissory notes in the amount of $400,000 are due on December 31, 2009. All other convertible notes are due prior to June 30, 2010; and the Company does not have the funds to repay such notes. Further, there is uncertainty as to timing, volume and profitability of transactions that may arise from our relationship with Hyundai Syscomm Corp. (Hyundai), Apro Media Corp. (Apro), The National Aeronautics and Space Administrations (NASA) and others. There can be no assurance as to the timing of when or if we will receive amounts due to us for products shipped to customers prior to June 30, 2008, which transactions have not yet been recognized as revenue. As of the date of this filing, the Company has ceased its business relationship with both Hyundai and Apro and a legal action has been filed in the State of California naming both, among others, as defendants. There are no assurances that any further capital raising transactions will be consummated. Although certain transactions have been successfully closed, failure of our operations to generate sufficient future cash flow and failure to consummate our strategic transactions or raise additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and to achieve its business objectives. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If the Company is unable to raise additional funds, it may be forced to further reduce, or cease operations, liquidate assets, or renegotiate terms with lenders and others of which there can be no assurance of success. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of the carrying amount of recorded assets or the amount of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Summary of significant recent financing transactions:

On August 22, 2008, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, LP (Enable), an existing institutional investor of MSGI and as of that date, holder of 100% of MSGI’s Series H Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant to which MSGI retired all outstanding shares of the Series H Preferred, warrants issued in connection with the preferred stock, exercisable for 5,000,000 shares of common stock of MSGI and put options exercisable for 5,000,000 shares of common stock of MSGI. Enable recently acquired the Series H Preferred Stock, Warrants and Options pursuant to a private transaction with third parties. In exchange for the retirement and/or redemption of the securities, MSGI issued Enable an 8% Secured Convertible Debenture due May 21, 2010 in the principal amount of $4,000,000, a $1,000,000 cash redemption payment and transferred to Enable warrants to purchase up to, in the aggregate, 20,000,000 shares of the common stock of Current Technology Corporation. The Redemption Payment was paid by MSGI from the proceeds of the restricted cash accounts maintained in connection with the original issuance of the Series H Preferred Stock. The balance of the funds held in the restricted cash accounts of $800,000 was released to MSGI for working capital purposes (See Note 3).

Effective October 1, 2008, the Company entered into addendum agreements to certain term notes payable, aggregating $2,860,000, with three out of four lenders, which terminated all warrants to purchase common stock issued under previous addendum agreements and, in their place, issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock. At execution of the addendums, the Company issued 378,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 378,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.50. The Company issued an additional 252,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 252,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.50 or market value on the date of grant, between the date of agreement and December 31, 2008.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company entered into addendum agreements to certain term notes payable with certain lenders, which issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock and revised the maturity date to March 31, 2009. The Company issued an additional 204,420 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 204,420 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.50 or market value on the date of grant. Effective February 1, 2009, the Company entered into an addendum to a certain term note payable with an additional lender which, at execution of the addendum, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock as well as revised the maturity date of this note to February 28, 2009. As of the date of this filing, the terms of two out of four of these notes have not been extended beyond the respective maturity dates stated above. Although the notes are technically in default, none of the lenders involved have made a claim of default and the Company is currently in negotiations for further extensions for all of the notes involved.

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company entered into addendum agreements to certain notes payable with two lenders, which obligated the Company to issue new warrants and shares of common stock and revised the maturity dates of the two notes to December 31, 2009. Further, the addendum resent the exercise price of certain previously issued warrants to the two lenders from $0.50 to $0.25. For the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued an additional 221,195 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 221,195 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25.

During 2009 and 2008, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $504,000 and $0 of advances from officers strategic partners, and others, which have no stated interest rate or maturity date.

In July 2009, the Company executed a NASA Funding Promissory Note in the amount of $240,004 with a lender who also holds a promissory note from December 2007. The new promissory note was executed in order to enable the Company to meet its obligations under a certain Space Act Agreement, which had been entered into with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The note bears interest at 25% and matures on August 30, 2009. In addition, the Company is obligated to issue 500,000 shares of common stock to the lender as additional consideration to enter into the note agreement. The shares were issued to the lender in September 2009. As of the date of this filing, the principal balance and accrued interest has not yet been paid to the lender. Although the note is technically in default as of the date of this filing, the lender has not made any claim of default and the Company is currently in negotiations with the lender for an extension to the terms of the note. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in securing any extension to the note.

Company Overview:

MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (MSGI, we, us or the Company) is adeveloping ~~provider of~~ proprietary solutions tofor commercial and governmental organizations. The Company is developing a global combination of innovative emerging businesses that leverage information and technology. The Company is headquartered in New York City where it ~~serves~~will be able to serve the needs of counter-terrorism, public safety, and law enforcement.

AsIn August 2009, the Company announced the formation of its first subsidiary for NASA based technology. The subsidiary, named Nanobeak Inc. (Nanobeak) is a nanotechnology company focused on carbon based chemical sending for gas and organic vapor detection. Some potential space and terrestrial applications for this technology include cabin air monitoring onboard the Space Shuttle and future spacecraft, ~~date~~surveillance of ~~this~~global ~~filing~~weather, ~~the~~forest ~~Company~~fire ~~has~~detection ~~announced~~and ~~the~~monitoring, ~~formation~~radiation detection and various other critical capabilities. The commercial applications of ~~two~~these ~~new~~nanotech chemical sensors relate specifically to efforts in Homeland ~~subsidiaries~~Security ~~under~~and defense, medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring and controls. Nanobeak seeks to offer products in each of these market sectors beginning in the ~~relationship~~current ~~with~~fiscal ~~NASA:~~year ending June 30, 2011, but the timing of these efforts can not be assured.

In ~~August~~ September 2009, the Company announced the formation of its ~~first~~second subsidiary for NASA based technology. ~~The~~Andromeda ~~subsidiary,~~Energy ~~named Nanobeak~~ Inc. (~~Nanobeak~~Andromeda) iswill abe ~~nanotechnology company~~ focused on ~~carbon based chemical sending for gas and organic vapor~~ ~~detection.~~scalable ~~Some~~alternative ~~potential~~energy ~~space~~solutions ~~and~~employing ~~terrestrial~~NASA ~~applications~~developed for this technology include cabin air monitoring onboard the Space Shuttle and future spacecraft, surveillance of global weather, forest fire detection and monitoring, radiation detection and various other critical capabilitiesnanotechnology. ~~The commercial applications~~ ofThese ~~these~~technologies ~~nanotech~~operate ~~chemical~~more ~~sensors~~efficiently ~~relate~~than specifically to efforts in Homeland Security and defense, medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring and controls. Nanobeak seeks to offer products in each of these market sectors beginning in the current ~~fiscal~~technologies year ending June 30, 2010, but the timing of these efforts can not be assured. In September 2009, the Company announced that it is launching its first product derived from the NASA nanotechnology, a handheld testing and ~~detection device for Diabetes that uses~~ ~~breath~~therefore ~~instead~~yield ofsignificantly ~~blood.~~lower ~~Nanobeak~~electricity ~~will~~costs ~~take~~per ~~the~~watt ~~prototype~~than ~~handheld sensor out of~~conventional ~~the~~energy ~~laboratory~~systems and ~~into the marketplace~~sources. The Company, through Nanobeak, will engage in product testing in conjunction with a major hospital network in the United States, followed by licensing discussions with the top pharmaceutical companies.

~~In September~~Liquidity 2009, the Company announced the formation of its second subsidiary for NASA based technology. Andromeda Energy Inc. (Andromeda) will be focused on scalable alternative energy solutions employing NASA developed nanotechnology. These technologies operate more efficiently than current technologies and ~~therefore~~ ~~yield significantly lower electricity costs per watt than conventional~~Capital energy systems and sources. The Company is already in receipt of several expressions of interest for partnerships in the planned deployment of this new technology, primarily from various major corporations located in the People’s Republic of China.Resources:

AsHistorically, ~~described~~the inCompany ~~Note~~has 13funded its operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions primarily through private placements of equity and debt transactions. The Company currently has limited capital resources, has incurred significant historical losses and negative cash flows from operations and has no current revenues. At June 30, 2010, the Company had ~~focused~~approximately $161,000 in cash and no accounts receivable. The Company believes that funds on hand will not be adequate to finance its ~~efforts~~operations ~~over~~and enable the ~~past~~Company ~~two~~to meet its financial ~~years~~obligations onand payments under its ~~relationships~~convertible ~~with~~notes ~~Apro~~and promissory notes for the next twelve months. All of our promissory notes and ~~Hyundai~~other notes payable are currently either past due or due within the next 12 months. ~~The~~There are no assurances that any further capital raising transactions will be consummated. ~~expected~~Although certain transactions have been successfully closed in the past, failure of our operations to begenerate ~~realized~~sufficient ~~under~~future ~~agreements~~cash ~~with~~flow ~~such~~and ~~parties~~failure ~~have~~to consummate ~~not~~our ~~materialized~~strategic transactions or raise additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to continue as ~~expected,~~a going concern and to achieve its business objectives. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ~~has~~ability ~~commenced~~to ~~litigation~~continue ~~against~~as ~~such~~a going concern. The accompanying ~~parties~~financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of the carrying amount of recorded assets or the amount of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. ~~Accordingly,~~ There are no assurances the ~~various~~Company ~~agreements~~will ~~with~~receive ~~Hyundai~~the necessary funding or generate revenue necessary to fund operations. If we are ~~deemed~~unable to byobtain additional funds, or if the ~~company~~funds cannot be obtained on terms favorable to us, we will be ~~null~~required to delay, scale back or eliminate our plans to continue to develop and ~~void~~expand asour ofoperations ~~June~~or 30in the extreme situation, ~~2009~~cease operations altogether.

MSGI has also historically acquired controlling interests in early-stage, early growth technology and software development businesses. These identified emerging firms are led by entrepreneurs and management teams that have “bleeding edge” products, but lack the infrastructure, business relationships and financing that MSGI can offer. The Company will typically seek to acquire a 51% controlling interest in the target company for a combination of cash and securities. The target company generally must agree to a ratchet provision by which the Company’s stake increases up to another 25% for failure to reach first years expectations. MSGI generally retains a right of first refusal in the event that any of the minority parties in the various companies receives an unsolicited offer for their interests in the business. To the extent these target companies do not meet MSGI’s continuing expectations; the Company will generally dispose of its interests in such operations.31

Summary of significant recent financing transactions:

During 2010 and 2009, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $674,000 and $167,000 of advances from a certain corporate officer, which have no stated interest rate or maturity date.

In July 2009, the Company executed a NASA Funding Promissory Note in the amount of $240,004 with a lender who also holds a promissory note from December 2007. The new promissory note was executed in order to enable the Company to meet its obligations under a certain Space Act Agreement, which had been entered into with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The note bears interest at 25% and matures on August 30, 2009. In addition, the Company is obligated to issue 500,000 shares of common stock to the lender as additional consideration to enter into the note agreement. The shares were issued to the lender in September 2009. As of the date of this filing, the principal balance and accrued interest has not yet been paid to the lender. Although the note is technically in default as of the date of this filing, the lender has not made any claim of default and the Company is currently in negotiations with the lender for an extension to the terms of the note. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in securing any extension to the note.

During March 2010, the Company entered into a series of 10% convertible promissory notes for an aggregate of $650,000. Closing costs of approximately $81,000 were paid from the proceeds, providing a net of approximately $569,000. These notes carry a maturity life of one year from the date of issuance.

During March 2010, certain convertible notes and debentures previously held by the Enable Capital Group, with a principal balance of approximately $10.3 million plus accrued interest, were to be acquired by Madison and Wall Investments, LLC who, in conjunction with the proposed acquisition of debt, provided the Company with a letter of agreement to convert the debt into shares of preferred or common stock and extinguish the debt. The agreement also called for all said shares to be locked up from trading until at least December 31, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the acquisition had not been formally closed and the shares of preferred or common stock had not been issued and the various debt instruments remain reported as debt in the financial statements. It is expected that the various convertible notes and debentures will be acquired by an independent third party and that the shares will be issued to the acquirer sometime prior to or during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 ending on March 31, 2011, pending approval for an increase to the number of authorized shares of common stock by a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the holders of certain convertible promissory notes provided the Company with letters of agreement that the various notes shall be extinguished and that the principal balances of these notes of approximately $1.9 million, plus any and all accrued interest thereon, would be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at an exchange rate of $0.20 per share. Further, it was agreed that these shares will be locked up and will not be eligible for trading until at least December 31, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the exchange shares have not been issued to the lenders by the Company and the notes will remain reported as debt until such time as said shares are issued. It is expected that the shares will be issued to the lenders sometime prior to the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, ending on March 31, 2011, pending approval for an increase to the number of authorized shares of common stock by a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

During June 2010, the Company entered into a series of 10% convertible promissory notes for an aggregate of $300,000. Closing costs of approximately $10,000 were paid from the proceeds, providing a net of approximately $290,000. These notes carry a maturity life of one year from the date of issuance.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MSGI and its majority owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company believes it has only one reporting segment.

Revenue Recognition:

The Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with ~~Staff~~Financial Accounting ~~Bulletin~~Standards ~~No.~~Board ~~104~~(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification 605, (~~SAB~~ASC ~~104~~605), which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. Revenues are reported upon the completion of a transaction that meets the following criteria of: ~~SAB 104 when~~ (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery of our services has occurred; (3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability of the sales price is ~~reasonably~~ reasonably assured. Since the Company had a limited number of revenue transactions, that were each unique to each customer, the Company reviewed each transaction to determine that all revenue criteria were met.

~~Our~~The ~~revenues~~Company inhad ~~2009~~no ~~were~~reported ~~derived~~revenues ~~from~~for ~~providing~~the ~~consulting~~year ~~services~~ended toJune ~~outside third~~30, ~~parties~~2010. ~~There~~Our ~~was~~revenues for nothe ~~deferred~~year ~~revenue~~ended ~~as of~~ June 30, 2009~~. Revenues~~ ~~for~~were ~~services~~derived ~~are~~from ~~recognized~~consulting ~~upon~~services ~~completion and~~provided ~~acceptance~~to ofthird ~~customer specified services~~parties.

The Company had certain shipments of products to various customers during fiscal 2008 in the aggregate of approximately $6.5 million that were not recognized as revenue in fiscal 2008, ~~or in fiscal~~ 2009, 2010, or to date, due to certain revenue recognition criteria not being met in these periods, related to the assurance of collectibility among other factors. These transactions will only be recognized as revenue in the period in which all the revenue recognition criteria, as noted above, have been fully met. Inventory costs, ~~related~~as tonoted ~~these~~in ~~transactions for which revenue has not been recognized had been reported on~~ the ~~balance~~paragraph ~~sheet in~~below, ~~“Costs~~related ~~of product shipped~~ to ~~customers~~these transactions for which revenue has not been ~~recognized”~~ ~~as of June 30~~recognized, ~~2008,~~ but have been fully reserved and expensed to the statement of operations as costs of good sold during the year ended June 30, 2009

Costs of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not been recognized

As of June 30, 2009, the Company ~~has~~ capitalized approximately $5.4 million in product costs for goods that were shipped to customers during fiscal 2008 but for which revenue has not yet been recognized in either fiscal 2008, in2009 ~~fiscal~~or ~~2009~~to date. The Company has also recorded a full reserve against these product costs in the aggregate amount of approximately $5.4 million, of which $4.1 million was recorded during the year ended June 30, 2009. This reserve estimates the potential costs that may be unrecoverable. The Company ~~is currently engaged in vigorous collection activities regarding the various amounts due which are related to these costs, which have now been fully reserved. The Company~~ has filed legal action against various parties involved (see Note 15) in the business operations and any ~~anticipates that certain~~ payment ~~will be~~ forthcoming through court action or potential settlement ~~and that income~~ will be recognized, ~~effectively~~as ~~offsetting the~~income ~~expense of the reserve,~~ upon receipt of payment. However, there can be no assurances that this will occur.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts:

The Company extends credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business. Accounts are reported net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. Bad debts are provided on the allowance method based on historical experience and management’s evaluation of outstanding accounts receivable. In assessing collectibility, the Company considers factors such as historical collections, a customer’s credit worthiness, age of the receivable balance both individually and in the aggregate, and general economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. The Company does not require collateral from customers nor are customers required to make up-front payments for goods and services. At June 30, 2009 and ~~2008~~2010, the Company has anfully ~~allowance~~allowed for ~~doubtful~~ accounts ~~of $60,000 for accounts~~ receivable from CODA ~~(see~~in ~~Note 13)~~the amount of $60,000.

Deferred Financing and other debt-related Costs:

Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of ~~its~~the associated debt ~~instrument~~instruments. The Company evaluates the terms of the debt instruments to determine if any embedded derivatives or beneficial conversion features exist. The Company allocates the aggregate proceeds of the notes payable between the warrants and the notes based on their relative fair values in accordance with ~~Accounting Principle~~FASB ~~Board~~ASC ~~No. 14 (APB 14),~~ 470-20 “~~Accounting for Convertible~~ Debt ~~and Debt Issued~~ with ~~Stock~~Conversion ~~Purchase~~and ~~Warrants~~Other Options.” The fair value of the warrants issued to to note holders or placement agents are calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company is amortizing the resultant discount or other features over the term of the notes through its earliest maturity date using the effective interest method. Under this method, the interest expense recognized each period will increase significantly as the instrument approaches its maturity date. If the maturity of the debt is accelerated because of defaults or conversions, then the amortization is accelerated. The Company’s debt instruments dodid ~~not~~ contain ~~any~~ embedded derivatives at June 30, 2009 (see Notes 7 and ~~2008~~8).

4033

Property and Equipment:

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

Furniture and fixtures	3 to 7 years
Computer equipment and software	3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment	6 years

The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, and repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of property and equipment sold or retired are removed from the accounts and resulting gains or losses are recognized in current operations.

Investments in non-consolidated companies:

The Company accounts for its investments in non-consolidated companies under the cost basis method of accounting if the investment is less than 20% of the voting stock of the investee, or under the equity method of accounting if the investment is greater than 20% of the voting stock of the investee. Investments accounted for under the cost method are recorded at their initial cost, and any dividends or distributions received are recorded in income. For equity method investments, the Company records its share of earnings or losses of the investee during the period. Recognition of losses will be discontinued when the Company’s share of losses equals or exceeds its carrying amount of the investee plus any advances made or commitments to provide additional financial support.

An investment in non-consolidated companies is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost on an other-than-temporary basis. Generally, an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless (i) the Company has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment; and (ii) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value.

Long-Lived Assets:

InThe ~~accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the~~ Company reviews for impairment of long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In general, the Company will recognize impairment when the sum of undiscounted future cash flows (without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of such assets. The measurement for such impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. Such assets are amortized over their estimated useful life.

Research and Development Costs:

The Company recognizes research and development costs associated with certain product development activities. The ~~Company~~costs are expensed as incurred. The Company recorded research and development expenses of $88760,~~200~~004 during the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2010 for costs associated with ~~development~~nanotechnology ofand ~~RFID~~product development ~~technologies.~~under the Company’s agreements with NASA. No such costs were incurred during the year ended June 30, 2009. An additional amount of approximately $1.0 million of research and development expenses are estimated to be incurred in the future, based on the company’s agreements with NASA.

Cost of Revenue / Product Sold:

Costs of goods sold are primarily the expenses related to acquiring, testing and assembling the components required to provide the specific technology applications ordered by each individual customer. In addition, reserves against costs of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not been recognized are also included in these expenses.

Income Taxes:

The Company recognizes deferred taxes for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at currently enacted statutory tax rates and laws for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, as set forth in ~~SFAS~~FASB ~~No.~~ASC ~~109,~~740 “~~Accounting for~~ Income Taxes.” ~~Under~~As prescribed by FASB ~~this~~ASC ~~method~~740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carry-forwards, all calculated using presently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. The Company has established a full valuation allowance ~~established~~due ~~against~~to ~~deferred~~the ~~tax~~uncertainty of ~~assets~~recognizing future income.

On July 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of ~~Financial~~FASB ~~Standards~~ASC ~~Accounting Board Interpretation No~~740-10. ~~48,~~FASB ~~“Accounting~~ASC ~~for~~740-10 ~~Uncertainty~~prescribes ~~in Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides~~ recognition criteria and a related measurement model for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. ~~FIN~~FASB 48ASC 740-10 requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are then measured using a probability weighted approach recognizing the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. There is no liability related to unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009.

The Company has not yet filed appropriate state or federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008, or 2009 and 2010.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting ~~principles~~ principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and ~~expenses~~ expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates ~~and~~ and assumptions made in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements relate to the carrying amount of long lived assets, deferred tax valuation allowance, valuation of stock options and derivative liability, warrants and debt features and the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk:

Major Customers

The Company’s ~~services~~is ~~are~~not currently ~~provided~~providing togoods ~~one~~or ~~client~~services ~~located~~to inany ~~the continental~~clients ~~United~~and ~~States.~~has ~~Three~~no reported ~~customers accounted for 86% of~~ revenues for the year ended June 30, ~~2008, of which none were in accounts receivable at June 30, 2008~~2010. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company provided consulting services to one client and all revenues recognized during the year were derived from this one client. Further, our relationship with Apro Media and Hyundai is considered to be terminated at this time, and the new relationship with NASA is considered to be critical to the Company’s ongoing business activities.

Major Supplier

The Company purchased 100% of its products from one supplier for the year ended June 30, 2008. This supplier relationship was obtained in connection with our Apro sub-contract. While this supplier was important to the Company’s operations under the sub-contract agreement with Apro, it is not expected that we will have significant ongoing transactions with such vendor. No products were purchased during the year ended June 30, 2009.

Cash concentration

The Company’s cash balance is maintained with one financial institution and may, at times, exceed federally insurable amounts. The Company has no financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk of accounting loss.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share:

In accordance with ~~SFAS~~FASB ~~No.~~ASC ~~128~~260, “Earnings Per Share,” basic earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of shares of common ~~stock~~ stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the reporting period; however, such potentially dilutive common shares are ~~excluded~~ excluded from the calculation of earnings (loss) per share if their effect would be be anti-dilutive. InDiluted ~~addition,~~earnings ~~stock~~per ~~options~~share ~~and warrants with exercise prices above average market price~~ in ~~the~~2010 ~~amount of 21,750,079~~ and ~~13,695,873 shares for the periods ended June 30,~~ 2009 ~~and~~excluded ~~2008~~99, ~~respectively~~679, ~~were not included in the~~989 ~~computation of diluted loss per share as they are anti-dilutive. Stock options~~ and ~~warrants with exercise prices below average market price in the amount of 8~~71,~~027~~443,~~569~~417 ~~for~~potentially ~~the~~issuable ~~period~~shares, ~~ended June 30~~respectively, ~~2008~~from ~~were not included in~~ the ~~computation~~ ofconversion ~~diluted loss per share as they are anti-dilutive as a result~~ of ~~net~~outstanding ~~losses~~convertible ~~during~~debt ~~the~~and ~~period~~accrued ~~presented. There~~interest, ~~were no stock~~ options or ~~warrants with exercise prices below average market price as of June 30,~~and ~~2009~~warrants.

4235

Summary of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~June~~ ~~2009~~January 2010, the ~~Financial~~FASB ~~Accounting~~issued ~~Standards~~new ~~Board~~guidance ~~(FASB),~~regarding ~~issued~~improving ~~SFAS~~disclosures ~~No.~~about fair ~~168,~~value "measurements. The ~~FASB~~ ~~Accounting~~guidance ~~Standards~~requires ~~Codification~~new ~~and~~disclosures ~~the~~related ~~Hierarchy~~to transfers in and out of ~~Generally~~Level ~~Accepted Accounting~~1 ~~Principles-a~~and ~~replacement~~Level of2 ~~FASB~~as ~~Statement~~well ~~No.~~as ~~162". SFAS~~activity in Level 3 fair Novalue measurements. ~~168~~The ~~establishes~~guidance ~~the~~also ~~FASB~~provides ~~Accounting~~clarification ~~Standards~~to ~~Codification~~existing disclosures. asThe ~~the~~new ~~source~~disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are ~~authoritative~~effective ~~accounting~~for ~~principles~~interim and ~~the~~annual ~~framework~~reporting ~~for~~periods ~~selecting~~beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, ~~principles~~issuances, ~~used~~and settlements in the ~~preparation~~roll forward of ~~financial~~activity ~~statements~~in ofLevel ~~nongovernmental~~3 fair value ~~entities~~measurements. ~~that~~Those disclosures are ~~presented~~effective infor ~~conformity~~fiscal ~~with~~years ~~generally~~beginning ~~accepted accounting~~after ~~principles~~December 15, in2010, ~~the~~and ~~United~~for ~~States.~~interim ~~This~~periods ~~SFAS~~within isthose fiscal years. Our effective date for the ~~Company's interim~~new ~~reporting~~disclosures ~~period~~and clarifications was the quarter ending March on31, ~~September~~2010. 30Our effective date for the disclosures about purchases, ~~2009~~sales, issuances, and issettlements ~~not~~in ~~expected~~the toroll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value ~~have~~measurements ais ~~material~~January ~~impact~~1, on2011. ~~the~~When ~~Company's~~effective, ~~consolidated~~we ~~financial~~will comply with the ~~statements~~disclosure provisions of this new guidance.

In ~~May~~ ~~2009~~January 2010, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~Accounting ~~No.~~Standards ~~165~~Update 2010-02, ~~"Subsequent Events". SFAS 165~~Consolidation ~~establishes~~(Topic ~~general~~810): ~~standards~~Accounting ~~for~~and ~~accounting~~Reporting for ~~and~~Decreases ~~disclosure~~in Ownership of ~~events that~~a ~~occur~~Subsidiary. ~~after~~This ~~the~~amendment ~~balance~~to ~~sheet~~Topic ~~date~~810 clarifies, but ~~before~~does ~~financial~~not ~~statements~~change, ~~are~~the scope ~~issued~~of ~~or available~~current toUS beGAAP. ~~issued~~It ~~and~~clarifies ~~was~~the ~~effective~~decrease ~~for~~in ~~interim~~ownership provisions of Subtopic 810- 10 and ~~annual~~removes ~~periods~~the ~~ending after~~potential ~~June~~conflict ~~15,~~between ~~2009.~~guidance ~~The~~in ~~adoption~~that Subtopic ofand ~~SFAS~~asset ~~No.~~de-recognition ~~165~~and ~~did~~gain ~~not~~or ~~have~~loss anrecognition ~~impact~~guidance onthat ~~the~~may ~~Company's~~exist ~~consolidated~~in ~~financial~~other ~~statements~~US GAAP. The ~~Company~~update ~~evaluated~~was effective for the quarter ~~all~~ended ~~subsequent~~March ~~events~~31, ~~that~~2010 ~~occurred~~and ~~from~~did ~~July~~not 1,have ~~2009~~an ~~through~~effect ~~October~~on ~~13,~~the ~~2009~~financial position, ~~and~~results ~~disclosed~~of ~~all~~operations ~~material~~or ~~subsequent~~cash ~~events~~flows inof ~~Note~~the 20Company.

In ~~April~~June 2009, ~~FASB~~the ~~issued~~Financial ~~FSP~~Accounting ~~SFAS~~Standards ~~No.~~Board ~~157-4,~~(FASB) ~~"Determining~~issued ~~Fair~~its ~~Value~~final ~~When the Volume~~Statement ~~and Level~~ of ~~Activity~~Financial ~~for~~Accounting ~~the~~Standards ~~Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly". FSP~~ (SFAS) No. ~~157-4~~ ~~provides~~160 ~~guidelines~~– ~~for~~The ~~making~~FASB ~~fair~~Accounting ~~value measurements more consistent~~Standards ~~with~~Codification and the ~~principles~~Hierarchy ~~presented~~of inGenerally ~~SFAS~~Accepted ~~No.~~Accounting ~~157,~~Principles ~~Fair Value Measurements. The FSP~~a ~~relates~~replacement toof ~~determining~~FASB ~~fair~~Statement ~~values when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales~~No. ~~It reaffirms what~~ 162. SFAS No. ~~157~~ ~~states~~168 ismade the ~~objective of fair value measurement-to reflect how much an~~ ~~asset~~FASB ~~would~~Accounting beStandards ~~sold~~Codification ~~for in an orderly transaction~~ (asthe ~~opposed~~Codification ~~to a distressed~~ or ~~forced~~ ~~transaction~~ASC) at the ~~date~~single source of ~~the financial statements under current market conditions~~U.S. ~~Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive~~GAAP. This ~~The~~did ~~FSP~~not ischange ~~effective for~~ the ~~Company's~~accounting ~~annual reporting~~rules ~~for~~ the ~~fiscal year ended on June 30, 2009. The implementation of FSP~~ ~~SFAS~~Company ~~No.~~needs ~~157-4~~to ~~did~~follow ~~not~~– ~~materially~~it ~~impact~~merely ~~the~~codified ~~Company's consolidated financial statements~~them.

In ~~April~~ October 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP~~Accounting ~~SFAS~~Standards ~~No.~~Update ~~107~~2009-~~1 and APB 28-1~~13, ~~"Interim Disclosures about~~Revenue ~~Fair~~Recognition ~~Value~~(Topic of605): ~~Financial~~Multiple-Deliverable ~~Instruments".~~Revenue ~~FSP SFAS No~~Arrangements. ~~107-1~~This ~~and APB 28-1 enhances~~update ~~consistency~~addressed inthe ~~financial~~accounting ~~reporting~~for bymultiple-deliverable ~~increasing~~arrangements ~~the~~to ~~frequency~~enable ~~of fair value~~vendors ~~disclosures.~~to ~~The~~account ~~FSP~~for ~~relates~~products toor ~~fair~~services ~~value~~(deliverables) separately ~~disclosures~~rather ~~for~~than ~~any financial~~a ~~instruments~~combined ~~that~~unit ~~are~~and ~~not~~will ~~currently~~be ~~reflected~~separated ain ~~company's~~more ~~balance~~circumstances ~~sheet~~that atunder ~~fair~~existing US ~~value~~GAAP. ~~Prior~~This toamendment has eliminated the ~~effective~~residual ~~date~~method of ~~this~~allocation. ~~FSP,~~Effective prospectively ~~fair values~~ for ~~these~~revenue ~~assets~~arrangements ~~and liabilities~~entered ~~have~~into ~~only~~or ~~been~~materially ~~disclosed~~modified ~~once~~in fiscal ayears ~~year.~~beginning ~~The~~on ~~FSP~~or ~~will~~after ~~now~~June ~~require~~15, ~~these disclosures~~2010. onEarly aadoption ~~quarterly~~is ~~basis,~~permitted. The ~~providing~~Company ~~qualitative~~does ~~and~~not ~~quantitative information~~expect ~~about~~the ~~fair~~provisions ~~value~~of ~~estimates~~ASU ~~for~~2009-13 ~~all~~to ~~those~~have ~~financial~~a ~~instruments not~~material ~~measured~~effect on the ~~balance~~financial ~~sheet~~position, atresults ~~fair~~of ~~value.~~operations ~~The~~or ~~disclosure~~cash ~~requirement~~flows ~~under this~~of ~~FSP is effective for~~ the ~~Company's interim reporting period ending on~~ ~~September 30, 2009~~Company.

In October ~~2008~~ 2009, the ~~FASB~~accounting ~~issued~~standard ~~FASB~~regarding ~~Staff~~multiple ~~Position~~deliverable arrangements ~~SFAS~~was ~~No.~~updated ~~157-3,~~to ~~"Determining~~ require the ~~Fair~~use ~~Value~~ of athe ~~Financial~~relative ~~Asset~~selling ~~When~~price ~~the~~method when ~~Market~~allocating ~~for~~revenue ~~That~~in ~~Asset~~these istypes ~~Not Active"~~of arrangements. This ~~FSP~~method ~~SFAS~~allows a ~~No.~~vendor ~~157-3~~to ~~clarifies~~use ~~the~~its ~~application~~best estimate of ~~SFAS~~selling ~~No.~~price ~~157,~~if ~~which~~neither ~~the~~vendor specific ~~Company~~objective ~~adopted~~evidence ~~with~~nor ~~respect~~third toparty ~~financial~~evidence ~~assets~~of ~~and~~selling ~~liabilities~~price asexists ofwhen evaluating ~~July~~multiple ~~1, 2008~~deliverable arrangements. This ~~The~~standard ~~Company~~update ~~will~~must ~~adopt~~be adopted ~~SFAS~~no ~~No.~~later ~~157~~than ~~for~~January 1, ~~its~~2011 ~~non-financial~~and ~~assets~~may ~~and liabilities~~be ~~beginning~~adopted ~~July~~prospectively 1,for revenue ~~2009.~~arrangements ~~The~~entered ~~Company~~into ~~has~~or ~~considered~~materially modified after the ~~guidance~~date of ~~provided~~adoption byor ~~FSP~~retrospectively ~~SFAS~~for ~~No.~~all ~~157-3~~revenue inarrangements ~~its~~for ~~determination~~all ofperiods presented. ~~estimated~~We ~~fair~~are ~~values, and~~currently evaluating the impact ~~was~~this ~~not~~standard ~~material~~update will have on our consolidated financial statements.

43In September 2009, the accounting standard regarding arrangements that include software elements was updated to require tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that work together to deliver the products essential functionality to be evaluated under the accounting standard regarding multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update must be adopted no later than January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact this new standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.

3. SECURITIES EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS

On August 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, LP (Enable), an existing institutional investor of MSGI and as of that date, holder of 100% of MSGI’s Series H Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant to which MSGI retired all outstanding shares of the Series H Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 warrants issued in connection with the preferred stock, exercisable for shares of common stock of MSGI and put options exercisable for 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock, which had a fair value of $6,700,000 on August 22, 2008. In exchange for the retirement and/or redemption of the above securities, MSGI issued Enable an 8% Secured Convertible Debenture (the 8% Debentures) due May 21, 2010 in the principal amount of $4,000,000 ~~(see Note 6)~~, a $1,000,000 cash redemption payment and transferred to Enable warrants to purchase up to, in the aggregate, 20,000,000 shares of the common stock of Current Technology Corporation. The redemption payment was paid by MSGI from the proceeds of the restricted cash accounts maintained in connection with the original issuance of the Series H Preferred Stock. The balance of the funds held in the restricted cash accounts of $800,000 was released to MSGI for working capital purposes. In connection with the Securities Exchange Agreement and the Debenture, MSGI and its subsidiaries entered into a Security Agreement and a Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, whereby MSGI and the subsidiaries granted Enable a first priority security interest in certain property of MSGI and each of the Subsidiaries. The net effect of this transaction resulted in a gain of $1,700,000, recognized during the year ended June 30, 2009.

44On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into a Warrant Exchange Agreement with Enable. Under this agreement Enable was granted the right to exchange all warrants held into 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, provided, however, that at no time shall any Holder beneficially own more than the Beneficial Ownership Limitation of 9.99% of the Common Stock issued and outstanding from time to time. The original warrants carry exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $2.50 and represent a total of 10,142,852 shares available to purchase. A non-cash interest expense of approximately $700,000 representing the fair market value of the committed shares was recognized, and a corresponding accrued liability was booked by the Company as of March 31, 2009. This accrued liability was adjusted to market value at the end of each subsequent reporting period until all of the warrants were exchanged. 500,000 shares of common stock were issued under this exchange agreement as of June 30, 2009 and 9,500,000 remained to be issued. The June 30, 2009 liability was adjusted to $285,000 by the Company to adjust to the fair market value of these shares at a market price of $0.03 per shares at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, all 10,000,000 shares have been issued to Enable. Non-cash expenses totaling $900,000 were realized related to these shares issued during the year ended June 30, 2010.

4. DEPOSITS ON TECHNOLOGY ~~LICENSES~~CONTRACTS

During the twelve month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company expended $175,000 as non-refundable deposits with a NASA for the rights to license technologies from the agency. On August 10, 2009, the Company announced that it had entered into a long-term relationship with NASA and intends to bring such technologies to commercial markets. The ~~Company~~$175,000 ~~will~~in bedeposits ~~required~~on totechnology ~~reimburse~~licenses ~~certain~~was ~~estimated~~expensed ~~costs~~as toresearch beand ~~incurred~~development byduring ~~NASA~~the infiscal ~~further~~year ~~development~~ended ofJune ~~these~~30, ~~technologies~~2010.

5. INVESTMENTS

Current Technology Corporation

On January 10, 2008, the Company entered into a Subscription Investment Agreement with Current Technology Corporation, a corporation formed under the laws of the Canada Business Corporation Act. The agreement provided for the Company to purchase from Current Technology a total of 25~~,000,000~~.0 million shares of its common stock, and common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 25~~,000,000~~.0 million shares of its common stock, for an aggregate purchase ~~price~~ price of $2,500,000. Payment of the $2,500,000 was to be made in five installments of $500,000 between January 4, 2008 and April 15, 2008. The common stock purchase ~~warrants~~ warrants were immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $.15 per share and they expire on January 9, 2013. The warrants contain anti-dilution and adjustment provisions, which allow for adjustment to the exercise price and/or the number of shares should there be a change in the number of outstanding shares of common stock through a declaration of of stock dividends, a recapitalization resulting in stock splits or combinations or or exchange of such shares. Of the 25.0 million shares of common stock and 25.0 million common stock purchase warrants, the Company acquired 20.0 million of each. The Company recorded the investment on the cost method of accounting.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~February ~~currently~~9, ~~has~~2009, Mr. J. Jeremy Barbera, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of MSGI entered into a 90-day bridge loan agreement with a lender yielding net proceeds of $1240,000.5 ~~million~~Certain ~~investment~~personal inassets ~~Current~~of ~~Technology~~Mr. Barbera were used as senior ~~Corporation,~~collateral. The Company also provided a ~~corporation~~full ~~formed~~guarantee ~~under~~and certain Company assets were used as junior collateral. The Board of Directors of the ~~laws~~Company approved the transaction during a meeting held on February 6, 2009. The net proceeds of the ~~Canada~~bridge ~~Business~~loan were advanced by Mr. Barbera, to the Company, to be ~~Corporation~~used ~~Act~~primarily for a new business venture with NASA on behalf of the Company as well as to meet short-term working capital requirements of the Company. The Company ~~owns~~has 15given ~~million~~no ~~shares~~consideration to Mr. Barbera for this personal guarantee of the bridge loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the lender made claim of default on the loan by Mr. Barbera. As a result, pursuant to the junior guarantee provided by the Company, we surrendered 5,000,000 shares of common stock of our holdings in Current Technology Corporation at a carrying value of $500,000 ~~which~~during ~~represents~~the ~~approximately~~year 9ended June 30, 2009.5% ~~ownership~~The ofCompany ~~its~~has ~~outstanding~~no ~~common~~further ~~stock~~guarantee obligations under the bridge loan agreement. ~~The~~Upon delivery of the committed assets from the Company, ~~recorded~~the lender provided Mr. Barbera with extended terms for the ~~investment~~payment onof athe ~~cost~~principal ~~method~~and accrued interest. The Company has determined that there is no liability required as of ~~accounting~~June 30, 2009 or 2010, as the committed assets have been provided to the lender and there is no longer a standing guarantee by the Company.

Pursuant to the original share purchase transaction, the Company held warrants to purchase 20,000,000 additional shares of common stock of Current Technology Corporation with an exercise price of $0.15 per share. In August 2008, MSGI entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with holders of the Company’s Series H Preferred stock and other instruments. In connection with this exchange, the warrants to purchase 20,000,000 additional shares of common stock of Current Technology were assigned to the parties to this agreement (See Note 3).37

Pursuant to a ~~junior~~the ~~guarantee~~original ~~provided~~share bypurchase transaction, the Company ~~under~~held awarrants ~~certain~~to purchase ~~bridge~~20,000,000 ~~loan~~additional shares of common stock of Current Technology ~~agreement,~~Corporation ~~which~~with ~~was~~an ~~entered~~exercise ~~into~~price byof Mr$0.15 Jper share. In ~~Jeremy Barbera~~August 2008, ~~Chief~~MSGI ~~Executive Officer~~entered ~~and~~into ~~Chairman~~a Securities Exchange Agreement with holders of ~~MSGI~~the Company’s ~~(see~~Series ~~Note~~H ~~16)~~Preferred stock and other instruments. In connection with this exchange, the ~~Company~~warrants ~~surrendered~~to 5purchase 20,000,000 additional shares of common stock of ~~it’s holdings in~~ Current Technology ~~Corporation~~were atassigned ~~a carrying~~to ~~value~~the ofpurchasers ~~$500,000. The Company has no further guarantee obligations~~of ~~under~~ the ~~bridge~~Series ~~loan~~H ~~agreement~~Preferred Stock.

InAs of ~~addition~~June 30, as2010, ~~part~~the Company owns 15 million shares of ~~this~~the ~~investment~~common ~~transaction,~~stock ~~Current~~of Current Technology, iswhich ~~to outsource~~represents 25approximately 10.6% ownership of its ~~business~~outstanding common tostock. During ~~MSGI~~the ~~through~~fiscal ~~Celevoke~~year ended June 30, ~~Inc.~~2010, (the Company determined that the fall in the value of the stock of Current Technology was an other-than-temporary ~~entity~~impairment in ~~which~~the value of its investment. The Company based its analysis on the fact that Current Technology ~~holds~~has been unable to file current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission since November 2009, had a ~~59%~~going ~~ownership~~concern ~~interest). No~~opinion ~~such~~based in large part on significant ~~transactions~~losses ~~between~~from ~~MSGI~~operations and ~~Celevoke~~insufficient ~~have~~funds ~~occurred~~available ~~during~~to ~~the~~continue operating. The ~~year~~Company ~~ended~~recorded ~~June~~an impairment of $1.2 million to ~~30,~~reduce ~~2009~~its orinvestment to ~~date~~the trading price of Current Technology as of June 30, 2010.

6. 8% ~~CALLABLE~~LIABILITY ~~CONVERTIBLE~~FOR ~~NOTES~~PAYMENT ~~PAYABLE~~DUE TO RFMON

~~The~~As 8%of ~~Callable~~June ~~Convertible~~30, ~~Notes~~2010, ~~Payable~~the ~~consist~~Company ofhad capitalized and fully reserved for approximately $5.4 million in product costs for goods that were shipped to customers during the ~~following~~year ended June 30, 2008. No revenue was recognized in the prior period or to date. Of the capitalized costs, approximately $1.4 million was included in trade accounts payable due to RFMon and $20,000 was included as a deferred license fee. These costs have been reclassified into a separate liability account as of June 30, 2010, as it is expected by the Company that the liability ~~2009:~~will not be paid to the party until the settlement of legal action that the Company has filed against various parties involved in the prior business operations. Assuming a favorable outcome of such legal action, the separate liability will be extinguished and a credit for the previously expensed costs will be realized.

457. DERIVATIVE LIABILITY FOR EXCESS SHARES

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009 net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2008, net of discount
8% Debentures	May 21, 2010	$	4,000,000	$	3,980,109	$	19,891	$	62
8% Notes	May 21, 2010		4,000,000		—		4,000,000		—
Total						$	4,019,891	$	62

Beginning in July 2009, the Company had convertible debt, accrued interest, contractually issuable shares, options and warrants that, if converted into common stock shares, would exceed the amount of the Company’s authorized common shares. From July 2009 through June 30, 2010 the Company continued to issue new shares of its common stock and new instruments convertible or exercisable into shares of its common stock. At each period of time that one of these instruments was issued, the amount of common shares which potentially exceeded the Company’s issuable shares above its authorized common shares increased. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had 73,354,351 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion in excess of its authorized capital.

8%The Company ~~Notes~~used a Black Scholes model with the following range of assumptions to value the derivative liability that resulted from these shares issuable in excess of its authorized share capital at inception of the liability:

On August 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, an existing institutional investor of MSGI (See Note 3). In connection with that Agreement, MSGI entered into an 8% convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $4,000,000 (the 8% Notes).

	Low			High
Underlying stock price:	$	0.04		$	0.18
Exercise/conversion price:	$	0.10		$	0.51
Term until expiration:	1 year			1 year
Dividend yield:		0.00	%		0.00	%
Risk free rate:		0.32	%		0.49	%
Volatility:		212	%		296	%

The 8% ~~Notes~~cumulative ~~have~~total ~~a maturity date~~ of ~~May~~the ~~21,~~liability ~~2010~~ and ~~accrue~~corresponding ~~interest~~reduction atin ~~a rate of 8%~~additional ~~per annum. Per the Notes, interest is payable on a quarterly basis, beginning~~ paid-in ~~October~~ ~~2008. The~~capital ~~investors~~recorded ~~can~~at ~~convert~~each ~~the~~inception ~~principal~~was ~~amount of the 8% Notes into common stock of the Company~~$5, ~~provided certain conditions are met~~582, ~~and each conversion is subject to certain volume limitations~~880. ~~The conversion price of the 8% Notes is currently at $0.25.~~

~~Total interest expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $274,000.~~38

In accordance with the guidance on accounting for embedded derivatives, the Company used a Black Scholes model with the following range of assumptions to value the derivative liability that resulted from these shares issuable in excess of its authorized share capital at June 30, 2010:

	Low			High
Underlying stock price:	$	0.08		$	0.08
Exercise/conversion price:	$	0.10		$	0.20
Term until expiration:	1 year			1 year
Dividend yield:		0.00	%		0.00	%
Risk free rate:		0.32	%		0.32	%
Volatility:		212	%		212	%

At June 30, 2010, the resulting liability from the 73,354,351 excess shares was $3,170,374. The change in the liability from inception to June 30, 2010 of $2,412,506 was recorded in the line item “gain on change in derivative liability” in the statement of operations.

As a result of recording the derivative liability for the shares issuable which exceeded the authorized number of common stock shares, the Company did not record additional derivative liabilities for certain reset provisions in the March 2010 and June 2010 convertible note agreements and detachable warrants issued in connection with those note agreements (see Note 8).

8. 10% CALLABLE CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

The 10% Callable Convertible Notes Payable consist of the following as of June 30, 2010:

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2010, net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount
10% Notes	March 23, 2011	$	650,000	$	646,964	$	3,036	$	-
10% Notes	June 30, 2011		300,000		299,500		500		-
Total		$	950,000	$	946,464	$	3,536	$	-

March 10 % Notes

On March 23, 2010, the Company entered into a private placement with individual institutional investors and issued secured convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $650,000 (the March Notes) and stock purchase warrants exercisable over a five year period for up to 6,500,000 shares of common stock.

The March Notes have a maturity date of March 23, 2011 and will accrue interest at a rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually. Payments of principal under the March Notes are not due until the maturity date and interest is due on a quarterly basis, however the Investors can convert the principal amount of the March Notes into common stock of the Company, provided certain conditions are met, and each conversion is subject to certain volume limitations. The conversion price of the 10% March Notes is $0.10 per share yielding an aggregate total of possible shares to be issued as a result of conversion of 7,150,000 shares. The exercise price of the Warrants is $0.15 per share.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with these notes was approximately $21,000 and $0, respectively.

June 10% Notes

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with these notes was approximately $600 and $0, respectively.

9. 8% CALLABLE CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

The 8% Callable Convertible Notes Payable consist of the following as of June 30, 2010:

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2010 net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount
8% Debentures	May 21, 2010	$	4,000,000	$	--	$	4,000,000	$	19,891
8% Notes	May 21, 2010		4,000,000		--		4,000,000		4,000,000
Total						$	8,000,000	$	4,019,000

8% Debentures

In connection with this debt, the note holders have warrants for the purchase of up to 7,142,852 shares of common stock, exercisable over a five-year period at an exercise price of $0.50. These warrants could be exchanged by the holder for shares of common stock of the Company per the Warrant Exchange Agreement dated March 16, 2009 (see Note 3). The shares will be issued to the holders of the exchanged warrants over time.40

The Company allocated the aggregate proceeds of the 8% Debentures between the warrants and the Debentures based on their fair value and calculated a beneficial conversion feature and warrant discount in an amount in excess of the $5 million in proceeds received. Therefore, the total discount was limited to $5 million. The discount on the Debentures was allocated from the gross proceeds and recorded as additional paid-in capital. The discount iswas ~~being~~ amortized to interest expense over the three-year maturity date. ~~Should the 8% Debentures be converted or paid prior to the payment terms, the amortization of the discount will be accelerated.~~ On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these Debentures. The conversion price of the Debentures was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25. No additional beneficial conversion expense was recorded related to the conversion price change due to the immaterial effect of this adjustment to the financial results of the Company as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010.

~~Total~~The ~~interest~~holders ~~expense~~agreed to waive certain provisions in the debentures and warrants, specifically ~~including~~those ~~debt~~pertaining ~~discount~~to ~~amortization~~cross default and the ability of the conversion price and exercise price of the debentures and warrants, ~~for~~respectively, to reset based on future equity issuances. The waivers covered the ~~years~~entire year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~the inCompany ~~connection~~obtained ~~with~~a ~~this~~further ~~note~~waiver ~~was~~through ~~approximately~~October ~~$594,000 and$~~1,~~825,800, respectively~~ 2010.

46On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 8% Debentures principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

InTotal ~~addition~~interest expense, ~~during~~including ~~the~~debt ~~year~~discount ~~ended June 30~~amortization, ~~2008,~~for the ~~exercise~~twelve ~~price of the related~~months ~~Warrants~~ended ~~issued~~June ~~to the lenders was reduced from $2.00 to $0.50 per share due to anti-dilution provisions triggered and the number of warrants was increased from 1~~30,~~785,713~~ to2010 ~~7,142,852. The change in exercise price~~ and ~~number~~2009 ~~of shares resulted~~ in anconnection ~~additional~~with ~~charge~~this tonote ~~interest~~was ~~expense~~approximately of $4~~,969,008 in the~~.4 ~~year~~million ~~ended~~and ~~June 30~~$594,000, ~~2008~~respectively.

~~During the year ended June 30, 2008, one of the institutional investors converted the principal amount of its~~ 8% Debentures into shares of common stock of the Company. These conversions resulted in the issuance of 2,153,597 shares of common stock of the Company and a reduction in the principal balance and corresponding acceleration of debt discount of $1.0 million. As part of this conversion, the Company allowed these investors to convert accrued interest of $76,798 into stock at the $0.50 conversion rate instead of paying the interest in cash. Therefore, the Company recorded an additional interest expense charge of $36,017 representing the additional value of stock provided for the interest payment.Notes

7On August 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with Enable Growth Partners, an existing institutional investor of MSGI. 6 In connection with that Agreement, MSGI entered into an 8% convertible note in the ~~CALLABLE~~aggregate ~~CONVERTIBLE~~principal ~~NOTES~~amount ~~PAYABLE~~of $4,000,000 (the 8% Notes).

The 68% ~~Callable~~Notes ~~Convertible~~have a maturity date of May 21, 2010 and are currently technically in default, although no such default has been formally claimed by the current holders. The notes accrued interest at a rate of 8% per annum through to the maturity date and shall accrue interest at the default rate of 15% per annum thereafter. Payments of principal and interest under the Notes ~~Payable~~are ~~consist~~not due until the maturity date. The conversion price of the ~~following~~8% asNotes is currently at $0.25. It is expected that the shares will be issued to the holders sometime during the third quarter of ~~June~~fiscal 30year 2011 ending on March 31, 2011, pending approval for ~~2009:~~an increase to the number of authorized shares of common stock by a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2008, net of discount
6% Notes	December 13, 2009	$	1,000,000	$	954,060	$	45,940	$	100
6% April Notes	April 5, 2010		1,000,000		988,370		11,630		55
Total						$	57,570	$	155

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $327,000 and $274,000, respectively.

10. 6% CALLABLE CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

The 6% Callable Convertible Notes Payable consist of the following as of June 30, 2010:

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2010, net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount
6% Notes	December 13, 2009	$	1,000,000	$	-	$	1,000,000	$	45,940
6% April Notes	April 4, 2010		1,000,000		-		1,000,000		11,630
Total						$	2,000,000	$	57,570

6% December Notes

The 6% Notes have a single balloon payment of $1,000,000, which was due on the maturity date of December 13, 2009 and ~~will~~accrued ~~accrue~~ interest at a rate of 6% per annum. The ~~Investors can convert the principal amount of the~~ 6% ~~Notes~~ ~~into~~Notes ~~common~~are ~~stock~~currently ofearning ~~the~~a ~~Company,~~default ~~provided~~interest ~~certain~~rate ~~conditions~~of ~~are~~15% ~~met,~~per ~~and~~annum. ~~each~~The conversion ~~is subject to certain volume limitations. The conversion~~ price of the 6% Notes is currently at $0.25. ~~The~~ ~~payment~~It ~~obligations under~~is ~~the~~expected ~~Notes~~that ~~accelerate if payments under~~ the shares ~~Notes~~will ~~are~~be ~~not~~issued ~~made~~to ~~when due or upon~~ the ~~occurrence~~holders ofsometime ~~other~~during ~~defaults described in~~ the ~~Notes. The warrants~~third ~~are~~quarter ~~exercisable through December 2013. The exercise price~~ of fiscal ~~the~~year ~~warrants~~2011 isending ~~$0.50~~on ~~per~~March ~~share.~~31, ~~These~~2011, ~~warrants~~pending ~~could~~approval befor ~~exchanged~~an byincrease ~~the~~to ~~holder~~the ~~for~~number of authorized shares of common stock ofby ~~the~~a ~~company~~vote ~~per~~of the ~~Warrant~~shareholders ~~Exchange~~of ~~Agreement dated March 16, 2009 (see Note 3). The shares will be issued to~~ the ~~holders of~~ ~~the exchanged warrants over time~~Company.

The 6% Notes ~~and~~contain ~~the warrants have~~ anti-dilution protections. The Company has also entered into a Security Agreement and an Intellectual Property Security Agreement ~~with the Investors~~ in connection with the original closing, which grants security interests in certain assets of the Company and the Company’s subsidiaries to the ~~Investors~~holders of the notes to secure the Company’s obligations under the 6% Notes and warrants.

The Company allocated the aggregate proceeds of the 6% Notes between the warrants and the Notes based on their fair values and calculated a beneficial conversion feature and warrant discount in an amount in excess of the $1 million in proceeds received. Therefore, the total discount was limited to $1 million. The Company isamortized ~~amortizing~~ this discount over the ~~remaining~~ term of the 6% Notes through December 2009. ~~Should the 6% Notes be converted or paid prior to the payment terms, the amortization of the discount will be accelerated.~~ On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these Notes. The conversion price of the Notes was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25. No additional beneficial ~~conversion~~ conversion expense was recorded related to the conversion price change due to ~~the~~ the immaterial effect of this adjustment to the financial results of the ~~Company as~~ ~~of June 30, 2009~~Company.

47On October 3, 2007, a $1.0 million portion of the Notes outstanding were purchased by certain third-party institutional investors, from the original note holders. The Company did not receive any cash as a result of these transactions and was not a party to the transaction. These institutional investors converted $1.0 million of the note balance as well as interest expense of $40,086 into an aggregate of 2,080,172 shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the conversion, the discount was accelerated for the related portion of the note in an amount of $736,111. In addition, as part of the conversion transaction, the Company allowed the note holders to convert at a rate of $0.50, which was lower than the stated conversion price under the note agreement. Therefore, in connection with this lower conversion rate, the Company recognized an additional beneficial conversion charge on the principal and interest converted of approximately $299,200 upon conversion.

~~On October~~As ~~3, 2007,~~ a result ~~$1.0~~of ~~million~~the ~~portion~~conversion transaction of the ~~Notes~~Callable ~~outstanding~~Secured ~~were~~Convertible ~~purchased~~8% byNotes ~~certain~~above ~~third-party~~and ~~institutional investors, from~~ the ~~original~~6% ~~note~~Notes ~~holders. The~~converted, ~~Company~~anti-dilution ~~did~~provisions ~~not receive any cash as a result~~ of ~~these transactions and was~~the ~~not~~remaining a6% ~~party~~Notes towere ~~the transaction~~triggered. ~~These~~The ~~institutional~~conversion ~~investors~~price ~~converted $1.0 million~~ of the ~~note~~remaining ~~balance as well as interest expense of $40,086 into an~~6% ~~aggregate~~Notes ofwas ~~2,080,172~~reduced ~~shares~~from of the ~~Company’s~~variable ~~common stock. In connection with the~~ conversion, ~~the~~rate ~~discount~~noted ~~was~~above ~~accelerated~~to ~~for~~a ~~the~~fixed ~~related~~rate ~~portion~~ of ~~the note in an amount of~~ $~~736,111~~0. In50. ~~addition,~~As asa ~~part of the conversion transaction~~result, the Company ~~allowed~~recognized ~~the~~an ~~note~~additional ~~holders to convert at a~~beneficial ~~rate~~conversion discount of approximately $~~0.50~~263,900, which was ~~lower~~recorded ~~than~~as ~~the~~a ~~stated~~discount to ~~conversion price under~~ the note ~~agreement. Therefore,~~ inand ~~connection~~allocated ~~with~~to ~~this~~additional ~~lower~~paid ~~conversion~~in ~~rate, the~~capital. ~~Company~~This ~~recognized an~~ additional discount ~~beneficial~~was ~~conversion~~amortized ~~charge~~over on the ~~principal~~ ~~and~~remaining ~~interest~~term ~~converted~~ of ~~approximately $299,200 upon conversion, which is reflected in interest expense for~~ the ~~year ended June 30, 2008~~note.

As a result of the conversion transaction of the Callable Secured Convertible 8% Notes above and the 6% Notes converted, anti-dilution provisions of the remaining 6% Notes were triggered. The conversion price of the remaining 6% Notes was reduced from the variable conversion rate noted above to a fixed rate of $0.50. As a result, the Company recognized an additional beneficial conversion discount of approximately $263,900 which was recorded as a discount to the note and allocated to additional paid in capital. This additional discount will be amortized over the remaining term of the note.42

~~Interest~~The note ~~expense,~~holders ~~including~~agreed to waive certain provisions in the ~~accelerated~~notes ~~discount~~and warrants, specifically ~~was~~those ~~$166,307~~pertaining to cross default and the ability of the conversion price and ~~$978~~ exercise price of the notes and warrants,~~026~~ ~~for~~respectively, to reset based on future equity issuances. The waivers covered the ~~years~~entire ~~ended~~year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~the Company obtained a further waiver through October 1, ~~respectively~~2010.

On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 6% Notes principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $1,088,000 and $166,000, respectively.

6% April Notes

On April 5, 2007, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and several institutional investors, MSGI issued $1.0 million aggregate principal amount of Callable Secured Convertible Notes (the 6% April Notes) and stock purchase warrants exercisable for 1,500,000 shares of common stock in a private placement for an aggregate offering price of $1.0 million. The 6% April Notes have a single balloon payment of $1.0 million which was due on the maturity date of April 4, 2010. ~~and~~These ~~will~~notes ~~accrue~~accrued interest at a rate of 6% per annum~~. The~~ ~~Investors~~through ~~can convert~~ the ~~principal~~maturity ~~amount~~date. ofAlthough the 6%notes ~~April~~are ~~Notes~~technically ~~into~~in ~~common stock~~default as of April ~~the Company~~4, ~~provided certain conditions are met~~2010, ~~and~~no ~~each~~such ~~conversion is~~default ~~subject~~has tobeen ~~certain~~formally ~~volume~~claimed ~~limitations. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 and are exercisable for a term of 7 years. These warrants can be exchanged~~ by the ~~holder~~current ~~for shares of common stock of the company per the Warrant Exchange Agreement dated March 16, 2009 (see Note 3)~~holders. The ~~shares~~notes ~~will~~currently beearn ~~issued~~interest toat the ~~holders~~default rate of ~~the~~15% ~~exchanged warrants over~~per ~~time~~annum.

As a result of a conversion transaction of the Callable Secured Convertible 8% Notes and the 6% Notes converted above, anti-dilution provisions of the April 6% Notes were triggered. The conversion price of the April 6% Notes was reduced from a variable conversion rate noted above to a fixed rate of $0.50. As a result, the Company recognized an additional beneficial conversion discount of approximately $166,700, which was recorded as a discount to the note and allocated to additional paid in capital. This additional discount will be amortized over the remaining term of the note.

The Company allocated the aggregate proceeds of the 6% April Notes between the warrants and the Notes based on their fair values and calculated a beneficial conversion feature and warrant discount in an amount in excess of the $1 million in proceeds received. Therefore, the total discount was limited to $1 million. The Company isamortized ~~amortizing~~ this discount to interest expense over the remaining term of the 6% April Notes through April 2010. ~~Should~~ ~~the 6% April Notes be converted or paid prior to the payment terms, the amortization of the discount will be accelerated.~~ On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into certain convertible promissory notes, which effected the anti-dilution provision of these April Notes. The conversion price of the April Notes was reduced from $0.50 to $0.25. No additional beneficial conversion expense was recorded related to the conversion price change due to the ~~apparent~~ immaterial effect of this adjustment to the financial results of the Company ~~as of June 30, 2009~~.

~~The~~It is ~~payment~~expected ~~obligation~~that ~~under~~ the ~~April~~shares ~~Notes~~will ~~may~~be ~~accelerate~~issued ifto ~~payments~~the ~~under~~holders sometime during the third ~~April~~quarter ~~Notes~~of ~~are~~fiscal ~~not~~year ~~made~~2011 ~~when~~ending ~~due~~on orMarch ~~upon~~31, 2011, pending approval for an increase to the ~~occurrence~~number of ~~other~~authorized ~~defaults described~~shares inof common stock by a vote of the shareholders ~~April~~of ~~Notes~~the Company.

48The payment obligation under the April Notes may accelerate if payments under the April Notes are not made when due or upon the occurrence of other defaults described in the April Notes. This potential acceleration has not taken place, although the April Notes are technically in default.

~~Total~~The note ~~interest~~holders ~~expense~~agreed to waive certain provisions in the notes and warrants, specifically ~~including~~those ~~debt~~pertaining ~~discount~~to ~~amortization~~cross default and the ability of the conversion price and exercise price of the notes and warrants, ~~for~~respectively, to reset based on future equity issuances. The waivers covered the ~~years~~entire ~~ended~~year ~~June~~ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~the inCompany ~~connection~~obtained ~~with~~a ~~this~~further ~~note~~waiver ~~was~~through ~~approximately~~October ~~$123~~1,~~907~~ ~~and $143,553, respectively~~2010.

~~8. OTHER NOTES PAYABLE AND ADVANCES~~43

~~Other~~On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 6% April Notes ~~Payable~~principal ~~consists~~and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the ~~following~~debt asinto a series of investments ~~June~~in 30various MSGI operating subsidiaries, ~~2009:~~primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2008, net of discount
Convertible Term Notes – short term	February 28, 2009	$	960,000	$	-	$	960,000	$	960,000
Convertible Term Notes – short term	March 31, 2009		1,500,000		-		1,500,000		1,500,000
Convertible Term Notes – short term	December 31, 2009		400,000		-		400,000		400,000
10% Convertible Term Notes – short term	June 17, 2009		250,000		-		250,000		-
Total					-	$	3,110,000	$	2,860,000

Total interest expense, including debt discount amortization, for the year ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in connection with this note was approximately $1,092,000 and $124,000, respectively.

11. OTHER NOTES PAYABLE AND ADVANCES

Other Notes Payable consists of the following as of June 30, 2010:

Instrument	Maturity	Face Amount		Discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2010, net of discount		Carrying Amount at June 30, 2009, net of discount
Convertible Term Notes – short term	February 28, 2009	$	960,000	$	-	$	960,000	$	960,000
Convertible Term Notes – short term	March 31, 2009		1,500,000		-		1,500,000		1,500,000
Convertible Term Notes – short term	December 31, 2009		420,000		-		420,000		400,000
10% Convertible Term Notes – short term	June 17, 2009		250,000		-		250,000		250,000
25 % Convertible Term Notes – short term	August 31, 2009		240,004		-		240,004		-
Total					-	$	3,370,004	$	3,110,000

Convertible Term Notes payable

On December 13, 2007, the Company entered into four short-term notes with private institutional lenders. These promissory notes provided proceeds totaling $2.86 million to the Company. The proceeds of these notes were used to purchase inventory. The notes carry a variable rate of interest based on the prime rate plus two percent. These notes had an original maturity date of April 15, 2008. During February 2010, one of the lenders extended an additional $20,000 to the Company with this amount being added to the already then outstanding balance of one of the existing notes. These notes were not repaid on this date and the terms were amended at several different dates to extend them to maturity dates of February 28, 2009, March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2009. While ~~two of~~ the notes payable are technically in default at this time, neither of the lenders have claimed default on the notes ~~and the Company is presently in discussions with these lenders regarding extended terms for these notes payable~~. ~~There are no guarantees that the Company will successfully execute the proposed addendum extensions with the two lenders.~~

Between April 30, 2008 and April 1, 2009, the Company executed a series of Amendments to the Term Notes, which extended the payment terms for the term notes through February 28, 2009 for one lender, March 31, 2009 for one lender, and December 31, 2009 for the remaining two lenders. Due to the default event, commencing on April 15, 2008, the interest rate is now at the default interest rate of 18%. Also, two of the holders now have the right to convert the note at a rate of $0.51 per share, and the other two holders have the right to convert the note at a rate of $0.25 per share.

4944

In addition, the terms of certain of the Amendments to the Loan Agreements called for the Company to issue five-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company to certain group lenders each week beginning May 1, 2008 and continuing for each week that the principal balance of the term notes remains outstanding. These warrants ~~are~~were ~~to be~~ issued with an exercise price set at the greater of market value on the date of issuance or $0.50 per share. As of June 30, 2008, a total of 284,717 warrants were issued to the note holders, 33,218 warrants with an exercise price at $0.60 per share and the remaining at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. These warrants were subsequently cancelled with the October 2008 addendum and replaced with other warrants and stock issued. In addition, there were 520,000 shares of common stock issued in fiscal 2008 in connection with these addendums.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company entered into additional addendum agreements with three out of four lenders with regard to their respectively held Notes, which issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock and extended the maturity date to March 31, 2009. The Company issued an additional 204,420 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 204,420 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.50 or market value on the date of grant. Effective February 1, 2009, the Company entered into an additional addendum agreement with the fourth lender with regard to its held Note, which issued 400,000 shares of common stock to the lender and extended the maturity date of this Note to February 28, 2009. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company entered into additional addendum agreements with two out of four lenders with regard to their respectively held Notes, which issued new warrants and additional shares of common stock and extended the maturity date to December 31, 2009. The Company issued an additional 221,195 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 221,195 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of the greater of $0.25 or market value on the date of the grant for the period April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009.

~~The net~~During ~~effect of all of~~ the ~~addendums~~twelve tomonths ~~these term notes during the year~~ ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~was~~ the ~~issuance~~Company ofissued 192,~~055,615~~400 warrants at an exercise price ~~ranging from~~of $0.25 ~~to $0.50~~ and 192,~~984,186~~400 shares of common stock. The stock was determined to have a fair value of $~~420~~7,~~749 for the year ended June 30~~707, ~~2009,~~ based upon the fair market value of the common stock on each date issued. The warrants were determined to have a value of $446,~~987 per SE, which includes an offset of the value of the cancelled warrants previously recorded~~953. The warrants were fair valued, at each warrant issuance, using the Black-Scholes model. The warrant and stock values were recorded as additional interest expense on the note during the ~~year~~twelve months ended June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010.

~~The~~In ~~following~~February ~~assumptions~~2010, ~~were~~the ~~used~~exercise inprice of 326,486 of the ~~Black-Scholes~~previously ~~model~~issued warrants was further reduced from $0.25 per shares to $0.15 per share as an incentive for one of the ~~warrants~~lenders ~~for~~to provide the Company with an additional $20,000 in cash. The effect of this change in exercise price to the fair value of the warrants was deemed immaterial and no associated adjustment was booked during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009:~~2010.

Expected term (years)	3
Dividend yield	0%
Expected volatility	143% - 213%
Risk-Free interest rate	0.98-2.12%
Weighted average fair value	$0.18

Expected volatility is based solely on historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. We rely solely on historical volatility because our traded options do not have sufficient trading activity to allow us to incorporate the mean historical implied volatility from traded options into our estimate of future volatility. The ~~expected~~following ~~term~~assumptions ~~calculation~~were ~~for~~used ~~stock options is based on the “simplified” method described~~ in ~~Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share−Based Payment. The risk−free interest rate is based on~~ the ~~U.S.~~Black-Scholes ~~Treasury~~model ~~yield~~for ~~in effect at~~ the ~~time~~ ofwarrants ~~grant~~ for ~~an instrument with a maturity that is commensurate with the~~ ~~expected term of~~ the ~~stock~~twelve ~~options.~~months ~~The~~ended ~~dividend~~June ~~yield of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends on our common stock~~30, ~~and we have no present intention to pay cash dividends.~~2010:

Expected term (years)			3
Dividend yield			0%
Expected volatility			215% - 235%
Risk-Free interest rate			1.23%-1.70%
Weighted average fair value			$0.06

Expected volatility is based solely on historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. We rely solely on historical volatility because our options are not traded and do not have trading activity to allow us to incorporate the mean historical implied volatility from traded options into our estimate of future volatility. The expected term calculation for stock options is based on the “simplified” method described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share−Based Payment. The risk−free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant for an instrument with a maturity that is commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we have no present intention to pay cash dividends.

10% Convertible Term Notes payable

On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into three convertible promissory notes with Enable which provided the Company with gross proceeds of $250,000. The notes bear interest at a rate of 10% annually and are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.25 per share. ~~Total interest expense was approximately $7,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009.~~ The notes had a maturity date of June 17, 2009. As an inducement to Enable to enter into the Convertible Term Notes, the Company entered into a Warrant Exchange Agreement with Enable ~~(see Note 3)~~. The remaining terms of the 10% notes carry the same provisions as the 8% Debentures ~~in Note 6~~. ~~While~~Due to the ~~notes are technically in~~ default atevent, commencing on June 3017, 2009, the ~~lender~~ ~~has~~interest ~~made~~rate nois ~~claim~~now ofat ~~default and~~ the ~~Company~~default israte ~~currently in negotiations~~of ~~with~~18%. While the ~~lender~~notes ~~for~~are antechnically ~~extension~~in todefault ~~the~~at ~~terms~~June of30, 2010, the lender ~~notes.~~has ~~There~~made ~~can be~~ no ~~assurance~~ ~~that~~claim ~~the~~of ~~Company will be successful in securing the extensions~~default.

On October 18, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a strategic Partnership with Attonbitus Development Inc. As part of this relationship, Attonbitus agreed to purchase all of the 10% Notes principal and accrued interest with the intent to convert the value of the debt into a series of investments in various MSGI operating subsidiaries, primarily those subsidiaries related to the NASA technologies.

25% Convertible Term Notes payable

Advances

During the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company received net funding in the amount of approximately $674,000 from a certain corporate officer. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received net funding in the amount of approximately $167,000 from this same corporate officer. As of June 30, 2010, the total net amount received from the officer is approximately $841,000. There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid upon the closing of any adequately successful funding event or upon the collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred. It is also noted by the Company that this certain corporate officer is owed approximately $697,000 in gross wages (including prior period wages totaling approximately $197,000) as of the twelve months ended June 30, 2010.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received funding in the amount of approximately $70,000 from Current Technology Corp. During the year ended June 30, 2010, $30,000 of the advance was repaid. There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid upon ~~collection~~ collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company received net funding in the amount of approximately $167,000 from a certain corporate officer (see Note 16). There is no interest expense associated with this advanced funding and this is to be repaid upon collection of the Apro Media related accounts receivable, which has not yet occurred.

9These advances have no stated maturity dates and are considered payable on demand. ~~COMMON~~The ~~STOCK,~~Company ~~STOCK~~has ~~OPTIONS~~not ~~AND~~imputed ~~WARRANTS~~interest on the above advances since it would not be material.

12. COMMON STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Common Stock Transactions:

During the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company issued 248,~~584~~759,~~186~~066 shares of common stock. Of these shares, ~~100~~9,500,000 shares were issued to a certain ~~corporate~~lender ~~officer~~ under ana ~~award~~Warrant ~~granted~~Exchange toAgreement, ~~the~~92,400 ~~officer~~shares bywere ~~the~~issued ~~Board~~to ofa ~~Directors~~lender in ~~May~~ ~~2007~~connection ~~resulting~~with inaddendum anto ~~expense~~certain ofDecember ~~$63,000~~2007 ~~based~~convertible ~~upon~~terms ~~the~~notes ~~fair value of the stock~~and ~~on the date of issuance~~37, ~~500~~666,~~000~~666 ~~shares~~ were issued to avarious ~~certain~~parties ~~lender~~in ~~under~~order ~~a Warrant~~to ~~Exchange~~pay ~~Agreement~~for ~~(see~~consulting services ~~Note~~and ~~3).~~legal ~~The~~fees ~~remaining~~provided and 1,~~984~~500,~~186~~000 shares were issued ~~to various lenders~~ in connection with ~~addendum~~certain tofinancing transactions during the ~~December~~fiscal ~~2007 convertible~~year ~~terms~~ended ~~notes~~June 30, 2010.

During the ~~period~~fiscal ofyear ~~February~~ended ~~2008 through~~ June ~~2008~~30, 2009, the Company issued 2,~~153~~584,~~597~~ 186 shares of common stock. toOf anthese ~~institutional~~shares, ~~investor~~100,000 aswere aissued ~~result~~to ofa ~~the~~certain corporate ~~conversion~~officer ofunder ~~principal~~an ~~and~~award ~~interest~~granted ~~related~~ to the 8%officer ~~convertible~~by ~~debentures. These~~the ~~conversions~~Board ~~resulted~~of Directors in aMay 2007 ~~reduction~~resulting ~~of principal~~ in ~~the~~an ~~amount~~expense of $163,000~~,000~~ ~~and~~based upon the ~~reduction~~fair value of ~~accrued~~the ~~interest~~stock on in the ~~amount~~date of ~~$76~~ issuance,~~798.~~ 500,000

~~During~~shares ~~the~~were ~~months~~issued ofto ~~May~~a ~~and~~certain ~~June~~lender ~~2008,~~under ~~the~~a ~~company~~Warrant ~~issued~~Exchange ~~520~~Agreement (see Note 3). The remaining 1,~~000~~984,186 shares ofwere ~~common stock~~issued to avarious ~~certain~~lenders ~~lender~~ in connection with an addendum to the December 2007 convertible ~~term~~terms notes.

During the months of July, August and October 2007, the holders of the 8% Notes and $1,000,000 of the December 2006 6% Notes elected to convert all remaining amounts of principal and accrued interest into shares of common stock of the Company under the provisions of the notes. (see Notes 6 and 7). In connection with the conversion, the Company issued 7,957,532 shares of common stock.

During March 2008, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock to an investor relations firm. The Company recorded an expense of $204,000 based on the fair value of the stock on the date of issuance.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 91,965 shares to members of our Board of Directors for payment of amounts owed for services. The Company recorded an expense of $193,129 based on the fair value of the stock on date of issuance in fiscal 2008.

Per the terms of the sub-contract agreement with Apro, the Company is to compensate Apro with 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock when the sub-contract transactions result in $10.0 million of GAAP recognized revenue for the Company. During the year ended June 30, 2008 the Company recognized approximately $3.8 million in revenues resulting from activities under the sub-contract agreement. In December 2007, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Apro for that agreement. The Company computed a fair value for a pro rata share of the remaining shares to be issued under that agreement, which was $62,336 at June 30, 2008 and reflected as a liability. The total expense for the year ended June 30, 2008 related to shares both issued and issuable to Apro was $1,052,336. The Company has subsequently named Apro as a defendant in a legal action taken in the State of California and currently views any and all contracts and agreements with Apro in breach. Based on this, the 62,336 accrued as of June 30, 2008 has been reversed out during fiscal 2009, as the Company does not anticipate doing further business with Apro, and therefore the remaining shares will never be earned by Apro.

Stock Options:

The Company ~~maintains~~maintained a qualified stock option plan (the 1999 Plan) for the ~~issuance~~ issuance of up to 1,125,120 shares of common stock under qualified and non-qualified stock options. ~~The~~As of June 30, 2010 the 1999 ~~Plan~~plan is closed and no further options may be issued under its terms. The 1999 Plan was administered by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors, which ~~has~~ had the authority to determine which officers and key employees of the Company will be granted options, the option price and vesting of the options. Of the 1,125,120 shares qualified under the 1999 Plan, 985,000 were issued prior to its expiration. In no event shall an option expire more than ten years after the date of grant.

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation under SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, which requires all share−based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statement at their fair values. The expense is being recognized on a straight−line basis over the vesting period of the options. The Company did not record a tax benefit related to the share−based compensation expense since the Company has a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.47

The Company accounts for employee stock -based compensation ~~expense~~under ~~related~~FASB toASC ~~stock~~718, “Compensation ~~options~~– ~~for~~Stock ~~the~~Compensation,” ~~years~~which ~~ended~~requires ~~June~~all ~~30,~~share−based payments to ~~2009~~employees, ~~and~~including ~~2008~~grants ~~was~~of ~~approximately~~employee ~~$221~~stock options,~~000~~ ~~and~~to ~~$486,000,~~be ~~respectively.~~recognized ~~The~~in the ~~non-cash~~financial ~~compensation~~statement ~~expense~~at istheir ~~included~~fair invalues. ~~salaries~~The ~~and~~expense ~~benefits~~is asbeing recognized on a ~~component~~straight−line ofbasis ~~operating~~over ~~costs on~~ the ~~consolidated~~vesting ~~statements~~period of ~~operations. As~~ ofthe ~~June~~options. ~~30,~~The ~~2009,~~Company ~~non-vested~~did ~~compensation cost that~~not ~~has~~record ~~not~~a ~~yet~~tax ~~been~~benefit ~~recognized~~related ~~was~~to ~~approximately~~the ~~$5,000,~~share−based ~~which~~compensation ~~will~~expense besince ~~recognized~~the ~~during~~Company ~~the~~has ~~fiscal~~a ~~year~~full ~~ending~~valuation ~~June~~allowance ~~30,~~against ~~2010~~deferred tax assets.

The ~~fair~~stock ~~value~~based ofcompensation ~~each~~expense ~~stock~~related ~~option~~to isstock ~~estimated~~options onfor the ~~date~~years ofended ~~grant~~June ~~using the~~30, ~~Black~~2010 and 2009 was approximately $5,000 and $221,000, respectively The non-~~Scholes~~cash compensation ~~option~~expense ~~pricing~~is ~~model.~~included ~~There~~in ~~were~~salaries noand ~~stock~~benefits ~~option~~as ~~grants~~a ~~during~~component ~~the~~of ~~fiscal~~operating ~~years~~costs ~~ended~~on the consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, orall ~~2008~~stock options have been vested and all related stock based compensation expenses have been recognized.

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no stock option grants during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 or 2009.

The following summarizes the stock options outstanding under the 1999 Plan:

Number

Exercise Price

Weighted Average

Number of Shares

Exercise Price Per Share

Weighted Average Exercise Price

of Shares

Per Share

Exercise Price

Outstanding at June 30, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010

985,000

1.40 to $7.00

1.94

Outstanding at June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009

985,000

1.40 to $7.00

1.94

52The aggregate intrinsic value of these stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007 was $4,650. There was no such value at June 30, 2010, 2009 or 2008.

~~The~~In ~~aggregate~~addition ~~intrinsic~~to ~~value~~the 1999 Plan, the Company has option agreements with current directors of ~~these~~the Company. The following summarizes stock options outstanding atas of June 30, ~~2007 was $4,650~~2010. There ~~was~~were no ~~such~~transactions ~~value~~for atthe three years ended June 30, ~~2009 or 2008.~~2010:

In addition to the 1999 Plan, the Company has option agreements with current directors of the Company. The following summarizes stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2009. There were no transactions for the two years ended June 30, 2009:

		Number of Shares				Exercise Price Per Share				Weighted Average Exercise Price				Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at June 30, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010			40,000			$	1.50 to $4.13			$	2.81			$	100

Number

Exercise Price

Weighted Average

of Shares

Per Share

Exercise Price

Outstanding at June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009

40,000

1.50 to $4.13

2.81

The aggregate intrinsic value of these stock options outstanding at June 30, 2007 was $100. There was no such value at June 30, 2010, 2009 or 2008.

~~The~~As of June 30, 2010, 1,025,000 options are exercisable, with no aggregate intrinsic value ofand ~~these~~a ~~stock~~weighted ~~options~~average ~~outstanding~~contractual atlife ~~June~~of ~~30,~~6.1 ~~2007~~years. The ~~was~~weighted average exercise price of all outstanding options is $~~100~~1. ~~There~~98 ~~was~~and nothe weighted ~~such~~average ~~value~~remaining atcontractual life is 5.1 years. At June 30, ~~2009 or~~2010, ~~2008~~there are no further options available for grant.

As of June 30, 2009, 1,016,666 options are exercisable, with no aggregate intrinsic value and a weighted average contractual life of 6.1 years. The weighted average exercise price of all outstanding options is $1.98 and the weighted average remaining contractual life is 6.1 years. At June 30, 2009, 140,122 options were available for grant.

Warrants:

The following summarizes the warrant transactions for the two years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010:

	Number			Exercise
	Number of Shares			Exercise Price
	of Shares			Price
Outstanding at June 30, 2008		20,698,442			$0.50 to $8.25
Outstanding at June 30, 2007		9,386,586		$	1.00 to $8.25
Granted		1,770,898			$0.25 to $0.50
Granted		11,341,856		$	0.50 to $2.50
Exercised / Exchanged		(5,232,066	)		$1.00
Exercised		-
Cancelled / Expired		(1,012,195	)		$0.50 to $7.50
Cancelled / Expired		(30,000	)	$	6.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2009		16,225,079			$0.25 to $8.25
Outstanding at June 30, 2008		20,698,442		$	0.50 to $8.25
Granted		12,242,400			$0.01 to $0.25
Granted		1,770,898		$	0.25 to $0.50
Exercised / Exchanged		(9,635,709	)		$1.00
Exercised / Exchanged		(732,066	)	$	1.00
Cancelled / Expired		(2,618,165	)		$1.00 to $8.25
Cancelled / Expired		(1,012,195	)	$	0.50 to $7.50
Outstanding at June 30, 2010		16,213,605			$0.01 to $2.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2009		20,725,079		$	0.25 to $8.25

All warrants are currently exercisable.

As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company has 2016,~~725~~213,~~079~~605 of warrants outstanding for the purchase shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.2505 to $82.2500, all of which are currently exercisable. The major transactions involving the warrants for the current period are below:

During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 92,400 five-year warrants to a certain lender in relationship to an addendum agreement. These warrants carry an exercise price of $0.25. A fair market value of approximately $7,000 for these warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was recorded as interest expense in the year ended June 30, 2010.

During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 2,150,000 five-year warrants to certain consultants for services provided with an additional warrant for 100,000 shares to be issued after June 30, 2010. These warrants carry an exercise price of $0.05. A fair market value of approximately $129,000 for these warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was recorded as consulting expense in the year ended June 30, 2010.

During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 10,000,000 five-year warrants to certain lenders and placement agents in connection to the March and June 10% Notes. These warrants carry an exercise price of $0.01 - $0.11. A fair market value of approximately $79,000 for 500,000 of these warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was recorded as interest expense in the year ended June 30, 2010. The fair market value for the remainder of these warrants was allocated to the proceeds of the transactions in the process of calculating a beneficial conversion feature discount on the value of the March and June 10% Notes.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company has 16,225,079 of warrants outstanding for the purchase shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.25 to $8.25, all of which are currently exercisable. The major transactions involving the warrants for the current period are below:

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 1,770,898 five-year warrants to certain lenders in relationship to the addendum agreements (see Note 8). These warrants carry an exercise price of $0.25 to $0.50. A fair market value of approximately $420,749 for these warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was recorded as interest expense in the year ended June 30, 2009.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company terminated the 715,283 warrants issued during the three months ended September 30, 2008, as well as 284,717 warrants issued during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and, in their place, issued 630,000 new warrants as well as shares of common stock. A fair market value of $100,073 for these new warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was expensed to interest expense in the year ended June 30, 2009, which was offset by the expense previously recorded for the terminated warrants, in the amount of $278,000.

53In connection with the August 2008 Securities Exchange Agreement (see Note 3), Enable Growth Partners agreed to cancel the 4,500,00 warrants it received in the January 2008 Series H convertible preferred stock transaction (see Note 17).

On March 16, 2009, the Company entered into a Warrant Exchange Agreement with Enable. Under this agreement Enable has been granted the right to exchange all warrants held into 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, provided, however, that at no time shall any Holder beneficially own more than the Beneficial Ownership Limitation of 9.99% of the Common Stock issued and outstanding from time to time. The original warrants carry exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $2.50 and represent a total of 1410,~~642~~142,852 shares available to purchase. AThe ~~non-cash~~Company ~~interest~~issued ~~expense~~500,000 shares of ~~approximately~~common ~~$700,000~~stock ~~representing~~under the ~~fair~~Warrant ~~market~~Exchange ~~value~~Agreement ofduring the ~~committed~~year ~~shares~~ended ~~has~~June ~~been recognized~~30, ~~and~~2009. aThis ~~corresponding~~issuance ~~accrued~~of shares resulted ~~liability~~in ~~has~~an ~~been~~exchange ~~booked~~of byapproximately 507,143 of the ~~Company~~10,142,852 asoutstanding warrants. At of ~~March~~June 3130, 2009. ~~This~~$285,000 remained accrued ~~liability~~ ~~will~~in bethe ~~adjusted~~accompanying toconsolidated balance ~~market~~sheet, ~~value~~representing at the ~~end~~remaining of9,500,000 ~~each~~shares ~~reporting~~of ~~period and~~common ~~was~~stock ~~$285,000~~to atbe issued ~~June~~under ~~30,~~this ~~2009~~agreement. The Company issued the remaining 9,500,000 shares of common stock under the Warrant Exchange Agreement during the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010. This issuance of shares resulted in an exchange ofcancellation of approximately ~~732~~9,~~000~~635,709 of the 14 10,~~642~~142,852 outstanding warrants. ~~As of June 30, 2009 $285,000 remains accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, representing the remaining 9,500,000 shares of common stock to be issued under this agreement.~~

~~10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS:~~49

In connection with the acquisition of Innalogic, intangible assets related to unpatented technologies totaling $287,288 were acquired and was amortized over the period of expected benefit of five years13. ~~As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, the~~ PROPERTY ~~asset~~AND ~~was fully amortized.~~EQUIPMENT:

Amortization expense recorded for each of the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $0.00 and $13,000, respectively.

11. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Property and equipment at June 30, consist of:

	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Machinery, equipment and furniture	$	86,794		$	7086,~~681~~794
Less: accumulated depreciation		(5467,~~495~~375	)		(3954,~~735~~495	)
Property and equipment, net	$	32,299		$	30,946
Property, plant & equipment, net	$	19,419		$	32,299

Depreciation expense was approximately $1513,000 and $1415,000 for the years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively.

1214. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Accrued expenses as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 consist of the following:

	2009		2008
	2010		2009
Salaries and benefits	$	~~397~~947,~~558~~706	$	~~136~~397,~~487~~558
Payroll taxes and penalties		1,~~489~~543,~~450~~477		1,~~341~~489,~~746~~450
Fair value of shares to be issued to Apro		-		62,336
Warrant exchange liability		-		285,000
Warrant exchange liability (see Note 3)		285,000		-
Audit and tax preparation fees		264,755		214,755
Audit and tax preparation fees		214,755		280,352
Interest		3,686,914		1,953,706
Interest		1,953,706		716,857
Taxes		66,907		42,907
Taxes		42,907		32,907
Board fees		104,000		80,000
Board fees		80,000		52,996
Rent		23,314		97,910
Rent		97,910		-
Other		27,865		120,906
Other		122,906		131,907
Total	$	6,664,938	$	4,664,192
Total	$	4,684,192	$	2,755,588

The Company has not filed or paid payroll taxes from September 2006 to date.

1315. CERTAIN KEY RELATIONSHIPS

Relationship with ~~Hyundai~~The ~~Syscomm~~National ~~Corp.~~Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

54The Company’s collaborative relationship with NASA was begun in August 2009 with the execution of a Space Act Agreement (SAA) forming a partnership between MSGI and the Ames Research Center (ARC) located at Moffet Field in California. The purpose of this collaboration between MSGI and NASA is to develop new prototype chemical sensors using NASA’s nano-sensor technology to meet MSGI’s need in sensor commercialization in security, biomedical and other areas. This sensor technology platform could potentially be used in efforts such as chemical leak detection and hazardous material detection. MSGI intends to develop this technology for commercial applications, homeland security applications, and medical diagnostic applications for type I diabetes (acetone detection) at first and possibly other applications in future years. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in commercializing such applications.

~~Beginning September~~In 11August 2009, ~~2006,~~ the Company ~~entered~~announced ~~into~~the ~~several~~formation ~~Agreements~~of ~~with~~its ~~Hyundai~~first subsidiary for NASA based ~~Syscomm~~technology. ~~Corp~~The subsidiary, named Nanobeak Inc. (~~Hyundai~~Nanobeak) is a nanotechnology company focused on carbon based chemical sensing for gas and organic vapor detection. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Some ~~currently~~potential ~~has~~space ~~executed~~and aterrestrial applications for this technology ~~License~~include ~~Agreement,~~cabin ~~Subscription~~air ~~Agreement~~monitoring onboard the Space Shuttle and afuture ~~Sub-Contract~~spacecraft, surveillance ~~with~~of ~~Hyundai~~global weather, forest fire detection and inmonitoring, radiation ~~prior~~detection ~~periods~~and ~~received~~various inother ~~consideration~~critical acapabilities. ~~one-time~~The ~~$500~~commercial applications of these nanotech chemical sensors relate specifically to efforts in Homeland Security and defense,~~000~~ ~~fee~~medical ~~for~~diagnostics ~~the~~and ~~License~~environmental monitoring and controls. Nanobeak seeks to offer products in these market sectors beginning in the ~~Company~~current ~~issued~~fiscal ~~900~~year ending June 30,~~000~~ ~~shares~~2011, but the timing of such offers may be affected by unforeseen difficulties in development and commercialization efforts. In September 2009, the Company's ~~common~~announced ~~stock~~that toit ~~Hyundai~~is developing its first product derived from the NASA nanotechnology, a handheld diagnostic device designed for medical and environmental testing and detection using breakthroughs in ~~connection~~nanotechnology ~~with~~and ~~all~~chemical sensing. Nanobeak intends to take the ~~agreements,~~handheld sensor offrom ~~which~~prototype ~~35,000~~to ~~shares~~commercial production and international distribution. The United States Department of ~~common~~Defense ~~stock~~DTRA Agency also agreed to provide ~~remain~~additional grant money to bethe ~~issued~~NASA atand ~~June~~MSGI ~~30,~~chemical ~~2009~~sensing initiatives during 2010 and 2011.

The initial term of the Sub-Contracting Agreement is three years, with subsequent automatic one-year renewals unless the Sub-Contracting Agreement is terminated by either party under the terms allowed by the Agreement.50

OnIn ~~February~~September 72009, ~~2007,~~ the Company ~~issued~~announced tothe ~~Hyundai~~formation ~~a warrant to purchase up to a maximum~~ of ~~24,000,000~~its ~~shares~~second ofsubsidiary ~~common stock in exchange~~ for ~~a maximum of~~ ~~$80,000,000~~NASA inbased ~~revenue,~~technology. ~~which~~Andromeda ~~was~~Energy ~~expected to be realized by the Company over a maximum period of four years~~Inc. ~~The~~(Andromeda) ~~vesting of the Warrant~~ will ~~take~~be ~~place quarterly~~focused ~~over the four-year period based~~ on ~~300,000 shares for every $1,000,000~~ inscalable ~~revenue~~alternative ~~realized~~energy bysolutions ~~the~~employing ~~Company~~NASA ~~from~~developed ~~contracts referred to us by Hyundai~~nanotechnology. ~~The revenue is subject to the sub-contracting agreement~~ ~~between~~These ~~Hyundai~~technologies ~~and~~operate ~~the~~more ~~Company~~efficiently ~~dated~~than ~~October~~current ~~25,~~technologies ~~2006. No transactions under this agreement have occurred as of~~ and ~~through June 30, 2009~~ ~~or to date and~~ therefore ~~there~~yield ~~have~~significantly ~~been~~lower noelectricity ~~warrants~~costs ~~vested~~per ~~under~~watt ~~this agreement.~~than ~~As such, the various agreements with Hyundai are deemed by the~~conventional ~~company~~energy tosystems ~~be null~~ and ~~void as of June 30, 2009~~sources. In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP of Mountain View, California to represent the Company in legal action against Hyundai Syscomm Corp, as well as several other entities and individuals, for alleged breach of contract.

Former Relationship with Hyundai ~~Apro~~Syscomm ~~Media Corporation~~Corp.

~~On May~~Beginning 10September 11, ~~2007~~2006, the Company entered into anseveral ~~exclusive~~Agreements ~~sub-contract~~with ~~and distribution~~Hyundai ~~agreement~~Syscomm ~~with Apro Media~~ Corp. (~~Apro or Apro Media~~Hyundai). ~~for~~The atCompany ~~least~~had ~~$105~~executed ~~million of expected sub-contracting business over seven years to provide commercial security services to~~ a ~~Fortune~~License ~~100~~Agreement, ~~defense contractor and/or other customers.~~a ~~Under~~Subscription ~~the~~Agreement ~~terms of contract, MSGI would acquire components from Korea~~ and ~~deliver~~ ~~fully~~a ~~integrated security solutions at an average expected level of $15 million per year for the length of the seven~~Sub-~~year~~Contract ~~engagement. In accordance~~ with ~~the~~Hyundai ~~Agreement, MSGI was to establish~~ and ~~operate~~in aprior ~~24/7/365~~periods ~~customer~~received ~~support facility~~ in ~~the~~consideration ~~Northeastern United States. Apro was to provide MSGI with~~ a ~~web~~one-~~based~~time ~~interface~~$500,000 tofee ~~streamline the ordering process and create an opportunity~~ for other commercial security clients to be acquired and serviced by MSGI. The contract calls for gross profit margins estimated to be between 26% and 35% including a profit sharing arrangement with Apro Media, which will initially take the ~~form~~License ~~of unregistered MSGI common stock, followed by a combination of stock~~ and ~~cash and eventually just cash. In~~ the ~~aggregate,~~ ~~assuming~~Company ~~all~~issued ~~the stated revenue targets are met over the next seven years~~865,000 ~~Apro Media would eventually acquire approximately 15.75 million~~ shares of ~~MSGI~~the Company's common stock. ~~MSGI was referred~~ to ~~Apro Media by~~ Hyundai ~~as part of a general expansion into the Asian security market~~, ~~however revenue under the Apro contract does not~~in ~~constitute~~connection ~~revenue~~with ~~under~~all the ~~existing Hyundai warrant to acquire common stock of MSGI~~agreements.

~~Per the~~The ~~terms~~initial term of the ~~sub~~Sub-~~contract~~Contracting ~~agreement~~Agreement ~~with~~was ~~Apro~~three years, ~~the~~with ~~Company is to compensate Apro~~subsequent ~~with~~automatic ~~3,000,000~~one-year ~~shares~~renewals ofunless the ~~Company’s common stock when the sub~~Sub-~~contract transactions~~Contracting ~~result~~Agreement inwas ~~$10.0 million of GAAP recognized revenue for the Company.~~terminated Inby ~~December~~either ~~2007,~~party ~~the Company elected to issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Apro~~ under ~~that agreement. The Company computed a fair value for a pro rata share of~~ the ~~remaining~~terms ~~shares~~allowed to be issued under that agreement, which was $62,336 at June 30, 2008, and has been reflected as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet. As discussed below, such revenue is never expected to be recognized by the ~~Company, and therefore this accrual has been reversed out during the year ended June 30, 2009~~Agreement. ~~The expense (income) is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.~~

~~For~~On February 7, 2007, the ~~years~~ ~~ended~~Company ~~June~~issued 30to Hyundai a warrant to purchase up to a maximum of 24,000,000 ~~2009~~shares ~~and~~of ~~2008~~common stock in exchange for a maximum of $80,000,000 in revenue, which was expected to be realized by the Company ~~had~~over ~~shipped~~a maximum ~~product~~period of four years. The vesting of the Warrant was to ~~various~~take place ~~customers~~quarterly inover the ~~aggregate~~four-year ofperiod ~~approximately~~based $0on ~~and~~300,000 shares for every $1.6,000,000 in ~~million~~revenue ~~under~~realized by the ~~Apro~~Company from contracts referred to us by Hyundai. The revenue was subject to the sub-~~contract~~contracting agreement between Hyundai and the Company dated October 25, 2006. No transactions ~~These~~under ~~shipments~~this agreement have ~~not~~occurred ~~been~~as ~~recognized~~of asand ~~revenue~~through ~~in fiscal~~June ~~2008~~30, 2010 or to date inand ~~fiscal~~therefore ~~year~~there ~~2009. In~~have ~~addition~~been ~~inventory~~no warrants vested under this ~~costs~~agreement. ~~related~~As tosuch, ~~these~~the ~~transactions~~various ~~had~~agreements ~~been~~with ~~reported~~Hyundai onare deemed by the company ~~balance~~to ~~sheet~~be innull and void as of June 30, 2010. In May 2009, the Company ~~Costs~~engaged the law firm of ~~product~~GCA ~~shipped~~Law Partners LLP of Mountain View, California to represent ~~customers~~the ~~for~~Company ~~which~~in ~~revenue~~legal ~~has~~action ~~not~~against ~~been~~Hyundai ~~recognized~~ Syscomm Corp, as well as several other Korean entities and individuals, for alleged breach of contract. During the three month period ended June 30, ~~2008~~2010, ~~and~~GCA ~~these~~Law ~~costs~~Partners ~~have~~filed ~~been~~a motion ~~fully~~to ~~reserved~~be dismissed as counsel for the Company and ~~written~~formally ~~off~~withdrew asfrom the ofproceedings. ~~December~~This 31action was not due to any foreseen difficulties with the Company’s case against the defendants, ~~2008~~but rather was the result of the Company’s currently inability to remit cash compensation to the firm on a timely basis. ~~See~~The ~~Note~~Company 2has ~~for~~engaged ~~further~~the ~~details~~assistance of alternative legal counsel and the case is proceeding.

55Former Relationship with Apro Media Corporation

On ~~August~~May 2210, ~~2008~~2007, ~~MSGI~~the ~~negotiated~~Company anentered ~~acceleration~~into ofan ~~both~~exclusive ~~its~~ sub-~~contracting~~contract ~~agreements~~and distribution agreement with ~~Hyundai~~Apro ~~and~~Media Corp. (Apro, ~~through~~or ~~Hirsch~~Apro ~~Capital~~Media) ~~Corp.,~~for ~~the~~at ~~San~~least ~~Francisco~~$105 ~~based~~million ~~private~~of ~~equity~~expected ~~firm~~sub-contracting ~~operating~~business ~~Hyundai~~over ~~Syscomm~~seven years to provide commercial security services to a Fortune 100 defense contractor and/or ~~Apro~~other ~~Media~~customers. Under the ~~accelerated~~ terms of contract, MSGI would ~~endeavor~~acquire tocomponents ~~build~~from upKorea toand deliver afully ~~platform~~integrated ~~with~~security solutions at an average expected level of $15 million per year for the length of the seven-year engagement. In ~~potential~~accordance with the Agreement, MSGI was to ~~generate~~establish ~~approximately~~and ~~$100~~operate ~~million~~a 24/7/365 customer support facility in ~~expected~~the ~~annual~~Northeastern ~~gross~~United States. Apro was to provide ~~revenue~~MSGI ~~supporting~~with ~~several~~a ofweb-based interface to streamline the ~~largest~~ordering process and create an opportunity for other commercial ~~businesses~~security inclients ~~Korea~~to ~~(see~~be acquired and serviced by ~~Daewoo~~MSGI. ~~sub-~~The contract ~~below). Based~~called ~~upon~~for ~~its~~gross ~~commitment~~profit margins estimated to ~~expand~~be ~~MSGI~~between 26% toand 35% including a ~~potential~~profit ~~run~~sharing ~~rate~~arrangement ofwith ~~$100~~Apro ~~million~~Media, inwhich ~~annual~~would initially ~~gross~~take ~~revenue~~the form of unregistered MSGI common stock, ~~Hirsch~~followed ~~Capital~~by a ~~will~~combination ~~have~~of stock and cash and eventually just cash. In the ~~right~~aggregate, assuming toall ~~earn~~the ~~shares~~stated ofrevenue ~~MSGI~~targets aswere ~~indicated~~met ~~under~~over the seven years, Apro ~~sub-contracting~~Media ~~and~~would ~~distribution~~have ~~agreement~~eventually ~~referenced~~acquired ~~above~~approximately 15.75 ~~There~~million ~~have~~shares ~~not~~of ~~yet~~MSGI ~~been~~common ~~any~~stock. ~~business~~MSGI ~~transactions~~was ~~under~~referred ~~this~~to ~~new~~Apro ~~contract~~Media by Hyundai as part of a general expansion into the Asian security market, ~~and~~however revenue under the ~~Company~~Apro ~~considers~~contract was not to constitute revenue under the ~~contract~~Hyundai warrant to beacquire common ~~null~~stock ~~and~~of ~~void~~MSGI.

In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP of Mountain View, California to represent the Company in legal action against Apro Media Corporation, as well as several other Korean entities and individuals, for alleged breach of contract. As such, the sub-contract with Apro is deemed by the Company to be null and void as of June 30, 2009.51

~~Daewoo~~Per /the terms ~~Hankook~~of the sub-contract agreement with Apro, the Company was to compensate ~~relationships~~Apro with 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock when the sub-contract transactions result in $10.0 million of GAAP recognized revenue for the Company. In December 2007, the Company elected to issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Apro under that agreement. The Company computed a fair value for a pro rata share of the remaining shares to be issued under that agreement, which was $62,336 at June 30, 2008, and has been reflected as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet. As discussed below, such revenue is never expected to be recognized by the Company, and therefore this accrual has been reversed out during the year ended June 30, 2009. The expense (income) was included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

OnFor the ~~September~~year 17ended June 30, 2008, the Company ~~executed~~had ashipped ~~new~~product ~~contract~~to ~~with~~various ~~Hankook~~customers ~~Semiconductor,~~in athe ~~division~~aggregate of ~~Samsung~~approximately ~~Electronics,~~$1.6 tomillion ~~manufacture~~under ~~and~~the ~~supply advanced~~Apro ~~technology displays and other electronic products for commercial~~sub-contract ~~security~~agreement. ~~purposes~~These ~~for~~shipments ~~Daewoo~~have ~~International.~~not ~~Under~~been ~~the~~recognized ~~terms~~as ofrevenue ~~the~~in ~~new~~fiscal ~~contract~~2008, ~~MSGI~~2009, ~~will~~2010 ~~subcontract~~or to ~~Hankook~~date. In ~~the~~addition ~~right~~inventory tocosts ~~manufacture~~related ~~certain~~to ~~Hi-definition~~these ~~display~~transactions ~~systems,~~had ~~which~~been ~~will~~reported beon ~~supplied~~the tobalance ~~Daewoo~~sheet ~~for~~in ~~its~~Costs ~~existing~~of ~~customers. MSGI~~product ~~has similarly entered into an agreement~~ shipped to ~~supply~~customers ~~Daewoo~~for ~~with~~which ~~these products~~revenue ~~based~~had ~~upon Daewoo specifications from its customers. There have~~ not ~~yet~~ been ~~any~~recognized ~~business~~as ~~transactions~~of ~~under~~June ~~this new contract. As such~~30, ~~the contract~~2008 ~~with Hankook~~ and these ~~Daewoo~~costs ishave ~~deemed~~been byfully ~~the~~reserved ~~Company to be null~~ and ~~void~~written off as of ~~June~~December 3031, ~~2009~~ 2008.

InOn ~~May~~August ~~2009~~22, ~~the~~2008, ~~Company~~MSGI ~~engaged~~negotiated an acceleration of both its sub-contracting agreements with Hyundai and Apro, through Hirsch Capital Corp., the ~~law~~San Francisco based private equity firm ofrepresenting ~~GCA~~Hyundai ~~Law~~Syscomm ~~Partners~~and ~~LLP~~Apro ofMedia. ~~Mountain~~Under ~~View~~the accelerated terms, MSGI would endeavor to build up to a platform with the ~~California~~potential to ~~represent~~generate approximately $100 million in expected annual gross revenue supporting several of the ~~Company~~largest commercial businesses in ~~legal~~Korea ~~action~~(see Daewoo ~~against~~sub-contract ~~Hankook~~below). Based upon its commitment to expand MSGI ~~Semiconductor~~to a potential run rate of $100 million in annual gross revenue, asHirsch ~~well~~Capital would have the right to earn shares of MSGI as ~~several~~indicated ~~other~~under ~~Korean~~the ~~entities~~Apro sub-contracting and ~~individuals,~~distribution ~~for~~agreement referenced above. There have not yet ~~alleged~~been ~~breach~~any ofbusiness transactions under this new contract, and the Company considers the contract to be null and void.

~~Relationship~~In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP of Mountain View, California to represent the Company in legal action against Apro Media Corporation, as well as several other Korean entities and individuals, for alleged breach of contract. As such, the sub-contract with ~~CODA~~Apro is deemed by the ~~Octopus~~Company ~~Group~~to be null and void as of June 30, 2010. During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, GCA Law Partners filed a motion to be dismissed as counsel for the Company and formally withdrew from the proceedings. This action was not due to any foreseen difficulties with the Company’s case against the defendants, but rather was the result of the Company’s currently inability to remit cash compensation to the firm on a timely basis. The Company has engaged the assistance of alternative legal counsel and the case is proceeding.

OnFormer ~~April 1,~~Daewoo ~~2007,~~/ ~~the Company entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with CODA~~Hankook Octopus, Inc. (CODA) whereby the Company will receive a referral fee on sales of products using the Innalogic proprietary technology. The Company recognized $100,000 in revenues during the year ended June 30, 2008 under this arrangement. No such revenue has been recognized during the year ended June 30, 2009.relationships

14On September 17, 2008, the Company executed a contract with Hankook Semiconductor, a division of Samsung Electronics, to manufacture and supply advanced technology displays and other electronic products for commercial security purposes for Daewoo International. ~~COMMITMENTS~~ Under the terms of the contract, ~~AND~~MSGI ~~CONTINGENCIES:~~would subcontract to Hankook the right to manufacture certain Hi-definition display systems, which would be supplied to Daewoo for its existing customers. MSGI had similarly entered into an agreement to supply Daewoo with these products based upon Daewoo specifications from its customers. There have not yet been any business transactions under this contract. As such, the contract with Hankook and Daewoo is deemed by the Company to be null and void as of June 30, 2010.

In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP of Mountain View, California to represent the Company in legal action against Hankook Semiconductor, as well as several other Korean entities and individuals, for alleged breach of contract. During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, GCA Law Partners filed a motion to be dismissed as counsel for the Company and formally withdrew from the proceedings. This action was not due to any foreseen difficulties with the Company’s case against the defendants, but rather was the result of the Company’s currently inability to remit cash compensation to the firm on a timely basis. The Company has engaged the assistance of alternative legal counsel and the case is proceeding.

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Operating Leases:

The Company leases certain office space in New York, New York and in San Francisco, California. All of the Company’s current leases are on a “month to month” basis and are cancelable. The Company incurs all costs of insurance, maintenance and utilities.

Rent expense for such space was approximately $~~283~~185,000 and $~~214~~283,000 for fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively, and was rented from officers at the Company.

The Company recorded research and development expenses of $760,004 during the year ended June 30, 2010 for costs associated with nanotechnology and product development under the Company’s agreements with NASA. An additional amount of approximately $1.0 million of research and development expenses are estimated to be incurred in the future, based on the company’s agreements with NASA.

Contingencies and Litigation:

Certain legal actions in the normal course of business are pending to which the Company is a party. ~~Several~~Certain ~~of the~~ ongoing matters relate to vendors seeking to get paid amounts owed by us, which amounts are included in trade accounts payable or are fully accrued as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010. The Company does not expect that the ultimate resolution of the pending legal matters will have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

56In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP, of Mountain View, California, to represent us in a legal action against Hyundai Syscomm Corp., Apro Media Corp., Hirsch Capital Corp. and other entities and individuals. Subsequently, the Company filed suit in United States District Court, Northern District of California, alleging, among other faults, fraud, breach of contract and unfair business practices. The Company seeks financial relief and compensation for the alleged actions of the parties named in the action. The engagement agreement calls for GCA to be compensated for all fees incurred on a contingent basis, pending outcome of the lawsuit, and, further, calls for the Company to issue 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company to each of the two partners managing the legal proceedings. The shares were issued to the attorneys in September 2009.

~~In May~~During ~~2009,~~ the ~~Company~~three ~~engaged~~month ~~the~~period ~~law~~ended ~~firm~~June of30, 2010, GCA Law Partners ~~LLP,~~filed ofa ~~Mountain~~motion to ~~View,~~be ~~California,~~dismissed toas ~~represent~~counsel usfor inthe aCompany ~~legal~~and ~~action~~formally ~~against~~withdrew ~~Hyundai~~from ~~Syscomm~~the ~~Corp~~proceedings., ~~Apro~~This ~~Media~~action ~~Corp.,~~was ~~Hirsch~~not ~~Capital~~due ~~Corp.~~to ~~and~~any ~~other~~foreseen ~~entities~~difficulties ~~and individuals.~~with ~~Subsequently,~~ the Company’s ~~filed~~case ~~suit~~against inthe ~~United States District Court~~defendants, ~~Northern~~but ~~District~~rather ofwas ~~California, alleging, among other faults, fraud, breach of contract and unfair business practices. The Company seeks financial relief and compensation for~~ the ~~alleged~~result ~~actions~~ of the ~~parties named in the~~ ~~action.~~Company’s ~~The~~currently ~~engagement~~inability ~~agreement~~to ~~calls~~remit ~~for~~cash ~~GCA~~compensation to bethe ~~compensated~~firm ~~for all fees incurred~~ on a ~~contingent~~ timely basis,. ~~pending~~The ~~outcome of the lawsuit, and, further, calls for the~~ Company tohas ~~issue~~engaged ~~50,000 shares of common stock of~~ the ~~Company~~assistance ~~to each~~ of ~~the~~alternative ~~two partners managing the~~ legal ~~proceedings.~~counsel ~~The shares were issued~~and to the ~~attorneys~~case inis ~~September 2009, and were fully accrued for at June 30, 2009~~proceeding.

~~15.~~Tax ~~SERIES H CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND PUT OPTION~~Returns

OnThe ~~January 10, 2008, the~~ Company ~~entered~~has ~~into~~not afiled ~~Preferred~~payroll ~~Stock~~tax ~~Agreement Transaction~~returns ~~with~~since ~~certain institutional investors (the Buyers), which consisted of a Series H Preferred Stock, warrants and a put option agreement~~2006. ~~The Company received proceeds of $5 million, of which a portion was used to make a significant investment in Current Technology Corporation (see Note 5).~~

The Company has not filed income tax returns since fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

When the Company obtains sufficient funding it plan to rectify this situation.

17. SERIES H CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND PUT OPTION

The Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Series H Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share. The preferred stock shall rank on a pari passu basis with the holders of the common stock in event of a liquidation, therefore there is no liquidation preference to the preferred stockholders. The preferred stock is not entitled to any dividends. The preferred stock is convertible at the holder’s election into common stock at a conversion rate of $1.00 per share.

Concurrently, the Company entered into the five-year Put Option Agreement with the Buyers pursuant to which the Buyers may compel the Company to purchase up to 5 million common shares (or equivalent preferred shares) at an initial put price per share of $1.20 which is in effect beginning July 10, 2008 through January 10, 2009. At each January anniversary date of the agreement, the put price increases $0.20 over the prior year put price until the put price is $2.00 in the last year of the put option agreement. The Buyers cannot exercise the options under the Put Option agreement until July 10, 2008. The Buyers are initially limited to a Maximum Eligible Amount, as defined in the agreement, of shares that can be put which is initially 1/6 of the total 5 million shares, which increases by 1/6 on each monthly anniversary. The put option agreement also contains a put termination price which is initially set at $2.00 for the period of July 10, 2008 through January 10, 2009 and then increases by approximately $0.33 for each anniversary year of the contract until it reaches $3.33 at the end of the contract. There are also certain other limitations, as defined within the agreement.

	August 22, 2008
Expected term (years)		1.80
Expected put option price	$	1.60
Dividend yield		0	%
Expected volatility		153	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.420	%
Put option fair value per share	$	1.34

On August 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement (see Note 3) with the holders of the Series H Convertible Preferred Shares and Put Options. The effect of this transaction was to fully cancel and redeem the Series H Preferred Stock, certain warrants and the Put Option agreements in exchange for other securities issued. Therefore, as of June 30, 2009, there are no shares of the Series H Preferred Stock outstanding, as well as there is no liability related to the put option.

~~16. OTHER COMMITTMENTS~~54

~~On February 9, 2009, Mr~~18. ~~J. Jeremy Barbera, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of~~ INCOME MSGI entered into a 90-day bridge loan agreement with a lender yielding net proceeds of $240,000. Certain personal assets of Mr. Barbera were used as senior collateral. The Company also provided a full guarantee and certain Company assets were used as junior collateral. The Board of Directors of the Company approved the transaction during a meeting held on February 6, 2009. The net proceeds of the bridge loan were advanced by Mr. Barbera to the Company to be used primarily for a new business venture with NASA on behalf of the Company as well as to meet short-term working capital requirements of the Company. The Company has given no consideration to Mr. Barbera for this personal guarantee of the bridge loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the lender made claim of default on the loan by Mr. Barbera. As a result, the Company forfeited the assets committed as junior collateral and Mr. Barbera forfeited certain personal assets. Upon delivery of the committed assets from the Company, the lender provided Mr. Barbera with extended terms for the payment of the principal and accrued interest. The Company has determined that there is no liability required as of June 30, 2009, as the committed assets have been provided to the lender and there is no longer a standing guarantee by the Company.TAXES:

17. INCOME TAXES:

Deferred tax assets are comprised of the following:

	As of June 30,
	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry-forwards	$	4347,~~869~~407,000		$	4043,~~677~~869,000
Compensation principally on option grants		1,563,000			1,319,000
Compensation on option grants		1,563,000			1,563,000
Amortization of intangibles		~~974,000~~-			974,000
Capital loss carryfoward		2,763,000			2,763,000
Other		~~577~~3,865,000			577,000
Total deferred tax assets		4955,~~746~~598,000			4649,~~310~~746,000
Deferred tax liabilities:
Discount on convertible notes		(2,369,000	)		(2,580,000	)
Other gains		(965,000	)		-
Total deferred tax liabilities		(2,369,000	)		(2,580,000	)
Discount on convertible notes		-			(2,369,000	)
Valuation allowance		(47,377,000	)		(43,730,000	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(965,000	)		(2,369,000	)
Valuation allowance		(54,633,000	)		(43,377,000	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

The difference between the Company’s U.S. federal statutory rate of 34%, as well as its state and local rate net of federal benefit of 5%, when compared to the effective rate is principally the result of no current domestic income tax as a result of net operating losses and the recording of a full valuation allowance against resultant deferred tax assets. In addition, the expected benefit is reduced 19% by non-deductible interest related to the convertible debt and 3% by other non-deductible expenses. The recorded income tax expense reflects domestic state income taxes.

The Company has aan estimated U.S. federal net operating loss carry forward of ~~approximately~~ approximately $~~112~~114,000,000 available, which expires from 2012 through ~~2029~~2030. These loss carry forwards ~~may~~are be subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and some loss carry forwards are subject to SRLY limitations. No ~~Section 382 study has been performed by the Company.~~ The Company has recognized a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets because it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable income will not be generated during the carry forward period available under the tax law to utilize the deferred tax assets. Of the net operating loss carry forwards approximately $61,000,000 is the result of deductions related to the exercise of non-qualified stock options in previous years. The realization of the net operating loss carry forwards would result in a credit to equity.

The Company has reviewed its deferred tax assets and has determined that the entire amount of its deferred tax assets should be reserved as the assets are not considered to be more likely than not recoverable in the future.

On July 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides recognition criteria and a related measurement model for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are then measured using a probability weighted approach recognizing the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The last year for which the Company has filed its US Federal and state income tax returns is 2007. The periods subject to examination for the Company’s tax returns are for the years 2003 to 2007. Until the Company files its 2008 and 2009 income tax returns, the statute of limitations covering those tax years does not begin.

5955

The Company believes that there is no significant financial statement impact as a result of FIN 48 for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010. NoDuring ~~financial~~the ~~statement~~fiscal year ended ~~benefit~~June ~~has~~30, ~~been~~2010, ~~taken~~the ~~for~~estimated US Federal net operating loss carryforwards more than likely became subject to IRC section 382 limitations due to the significant change in ownership the Company’s experienced during the year. Should the Company perform the required study and determine that it is subject to the limitations under IRC section 382, the ability of the Company to utilize its US Federal net operating loss carryforwards could become severely restricted and could result in the Company becoming unable to utilize a significant portion of those net operating loss carryforwards in future periods in which it might generate taxable income.

1819. EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SAVINGS 401(k) PLANS:

The Company ~~sponsors~~sponsored a tax deferred retirement savings plan (401(k) plan) which ~~permits~~permitted eligible employees to contribute varying percentages of their compensation up to the annual limit allowed by the Internal Revenue Service.

The Company ~~currently~~formerly ~~matches~~matched the 50% of the first $3,000 of employee contribution up up to a maximum of $1,500 per employee. There were no employee contributions to ~~the~~ the plan or matching contributions made during the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 or ~~2008~~2009. The plan also provided for discretionary Company contributions. ~~There~~ There were no discretionary contributions in fiscal years ~~2009~~2010 or 2009. This 401(k) ~~2008~~plan is currently dormant and the remaining employees of the Company no longer participate in the plan. It is the intention of the Company to terminate this plan during the current fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 and initial steps in that regard have been undertaken with the plan management company, The Gellar Group.

1920. ~~SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF~~ NON-CASH DISCLOSURES ~~INVESTING~~NOT ~~AND~~DESCRIBED ~~FINANCING ACTIVITIES:~~ELESEWHERE

~~For~~At June 30, 2009 the Company had accrued $285,000 for the value of future shares to issued under the Enable Exchange agreement (see Note 3). That liability was satisfied in the current fiscal year ~~ended~~through ~~June~~the 30issuance of the remaining 9,500,000 ~~2009:~~shares to Enable under the agreement.

·During the ~~Deferred~~current ~~financing~~year ~~charges~~ended ~~accrued~~June in30, ~~connection~~2010 ~~with~~the ~~Securities~~Company ~~Exchange~~recorded ~~Agreement,~~a reduction in ~~the~~its additional ~~amount~~paid-in capital of $205,~~000~~582,880 for the value of derivative liability created by the Company issuing instruments convertible or exercisable into shares of its common stock in excess of its authorized capital (see Note 7).

~~For~~In March and June 2010, the Company entered into a series of secured convertible ~~year~~promissory ~~ended~~note ~~June~~financing 30transactions that raised gross proceeds of $950,000 (see ~~2008:~~Note 8). In connection with those offerings, the Company issued convertible promissory notes and warrants that resulted in essentially 100% of the proceeds of the offering being allocated to the beneficial conversion features and warrants, which resulted in the Company recording a discount to the notes of approximately $950,000. In addition, as part of the March offering, the Company issued warrants to acquire 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company valued that warrant at $79,219 and recorded that amount as deferred loan fees.

·In connection ~~Conversion~~with ofthe $4July 31,~~571~~ 2009 convertible note offering,~~958~~ in ~~convertible~~which ~~debt~~the Company ~~principal~~raised ~~and~~gross proceeds of $~~667~~240,~~198~~004 of(see ~~interest~~Note ~~into~~11), 10the Company issued to the lender 500,~~111,129~~000 shares as an inducement to make the loan. The value of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~shares at the time of the offering was $20,000 and was recorded as a discount to the convertible note.

~~· Issuance of 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Apro Media Corp pursuant to sub-contractor agreement, with a fair value of $990,000.~~56

· Issuance of 91,965 shares of common stock to members of the Board of Directors as payment for services, with a fair value of $193,129.

· Additional debt discount of $1,032,408 related to anti-dilution provision of conversion feature option on Notes.

· Deferred financing fees and warrant discount related to new term debt, with a value of $182,992

20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

In July 2009, the Company executed a NASA Funding Promissory Note in the amount of $240,004 with a lender who also holds a promissory note from December 2007. The new promissory note was executed in order to enable the Company to meet its obligations under a certain Space Act Agreement, which had been entered into with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The note bears interest at 25% and matured on August 30, 2009. In addition, the Company is obligated to issue 500,000 shares of common stock to the lender as additional consideration to enter into the note agreement. The shares were issued to the lender in September 2009. As of the date of this filing, the principal balance and accrued interest has not yet been paid to the lender. Although the note is technically in default as of the date of this filing, the lender has made no formal claim of default and the Company is currently in negotiations with the lender for extension of the terms.

In August 2009, the Company announced that it had executed a Space Act Agreement with NASA forming a partnership between MSGI and the Ames Research Center (ARC) located in Moffet Field, California. The purpose of this collaboration between MSGI and NASA is to commercialize various revolutionary technologies developed by NASA in the fields of nanotechnology and alternative energy. The Company’s initial area of focus is to be on the use of chemical sensors or nano-sensing technology. These wired and wireless detection systems were first developed for space exploration in 2007 and 2008 for experiments carried out on the Space Shuttle Endeavor. The Company intends to form a number of majority owned subsidiaries, each of which will hold the rights to a specific technology and also serve as the vehicle for investment capital.

In August 2009, the Company announced that it had formed its first subsidiary for NASA based technology. This new subsidiary, named Nanobeak Inc., is a nanotechnology company focused on carbon based chemical sensing for gas and organic vapor detection – effectively electronic sniffing. NASA developed these Nano Chemical Sensors for space missions to increase scientific measurement capabilities with less mass and lower power requirements. The potential space and terrestrial applications include cabin air monitoring onboard the Space Shuttle, surveillance of global weather, forest fire monitoring, radiation detection, and various other mission critical capabilities. This technology was developed at the NASA Ames Research Center located in Moffet Field, California. The commercial applications of these Nano Chemical Sensors relate specifically to Homeland Security and Defense, Medical Diagnoses, Environmental Monitoring and Process Control. Nanobeak seek to offer offer products in each of these sectors beginning in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, but timing of these efforts can not be assured. The Company subsequently reported the launching of its first product derived from NASA technology, a handheld test for Diabetes, which uses breath instead of blood. Nanobeak will take the prototype handheld sensor, which measures acetone levels with a simple breath, out of the laboratory and into the marketplace. Nanobeak will undertake product testing which will be done in conjunction with a major hospital network in the United States, followed by licensing discussions with the top pharmaceutical companies.

Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company entered into several business development, investor relations and consulting and advisory agreements with two separate service providers. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company has committed to issue shares of common stock in lieu of cash in consideration for the valuable services provided and to be provided by these individual firms. As of the date of this filing, the Company has issued approximately 5.2 million shares of common stock in lieu of various categories of cash compensation for services rendered and to be rendered by the firms. Such services include, but are not be limited to, investor relations, identification of potential providers of equity or hybrid financing, the identification of strategic or joint-venture and licensing partners, the identification of merger and/or acquisition candidates, the provision of general business advice, the overview of governmental procurement programs, the preparation of disclosure, marketing and promotional materials.

Since June 30, 2009, the Company has issued 14,590,500 shares of common stock. Of these shares, 5,800,000 were issued under a certain Warrant Exchange Agreement, 500,000 were issued pursuant to a certain short-tem note, 45,500 were issued pursuant to certain addendum to short-terms loans and 8,245,000 were issued to a variety of service providers for services to be rendered.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

N/A

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We are responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (~~“Exchange Act”~~a) ~~is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time~~ EVALUATION ~~periods~~OF ~~and~~DISCLOSURE ~~accumulated~~CONTROLS ~~and~~AND ~~communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.~~PROCEDURES

61Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, at June 30, 2009. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that, as of that date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting (as described below in “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”), which we view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures.

On October 13, 2009, our independent registered public accounting firm Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP (AP&M), informed us and our Audit Committee of the Board of Directors that they had discovered conditions which they deemed to be material weaknesses in our internal controls (as defined by standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) summarized as follows:

· A lack of sufficient resources and an insufficient level of monitoring and oversight, which restricts the Company's ability to gather, analyze and report information relative to the financial statement assertions in a timely manner, including insufficient documentation and review of selection and application of generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions.

· The limited size of the accounting department makes it impracticable to achieve an appropriate segregation of duties.

· There are no formal documented closing and reporting calendar and checklists.

· There are no formal cash flow forecasts, business plans, and organizational structure documents to guide the employees in critical decision-making processes.

· Ineffective controls over revenue recognition.

· Ineffective procedures to appropriately account for and report on related party transactions.

· Documentation (and retention thereof) of certain transactions was not completed on a timely basis.

· The Company does not have a procedure to ensure the timely issuance of equity securities upon Board or contractual approval.

· Payroll and income tax filings have not been made timely.

· Material weaknesses identified in the past have not been remediated.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~Our~~This company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining ~~adequate~~ internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting asand ~~defined~~disclosure incontrols. ~~Rule13a-15(f)~~Internal ofControl ~~the Securities~~Over ~~Exchange~~Financial ~~Act~~Reporting ofis ~~1934. Our~~a ~~internal~~process ~~control system was~~ designed ~~to provide~~by, ~~reasonable~~or ~~assurance~~under ~~regarding~~ the ~~reliability~~supervision of, ~~financial reporting~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~the~~principal ~~preparation~~executive ~~of financial reporting~~ and ~~the~~principal ~~preparation~~financial ofofficers, ~~financial~~or persons ~~statements~~performing ~~for~~similar ~~external purposes~~functions, inand ~~accordance~~effected ~~with~~by ~~generally~~the ~~accepted accounting~~issuer’s ~~principles. Because~~board of ~~its inherent limitations~~directors, ~~internal~~ ~~control~~management ~~over~~and ~~financial~~other ~~reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also~~personnel, ~~projections~~to ofprovide ~~any~~reasonable ~~evaluation~~assurance ofregarding ~~effectiveness~~the toreliability ~~future~~of ~~periods~~financial ~~are~~reporting ~~subject~~and to the ~~risk~~preparation ~~that~~of ~~controls~~financial ~~may become inadequate~~statements ~~because~~for ofexternal ~~changes~~purposes in ~~conditions,~~accordance orwith ~~that~~generally ~~the~~accepted ~~degree~~accounting principles ofand ~~compliance~~includes ~~with~~those ~~the~~ policies orand procedures ~~may deteriorate.~~that:

	1.	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer;

	2.	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the registrant; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. As a result of this assessment, management identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. ~~In our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at June 30, 2009, we identified the following material weaknesses:~~

~~Management~~Based on ~~has~~its ~~identified~~evaluation ~~several~~and ~~material~~due ~~weaknesses,~~to ~~some~~the ofmaterial ~~which~~weaknesses ~~are~~noted, ~~included~~our ~~in the~~management ~~list~~concluded ~~above~~that ofour ~~material~~internal ~~weaknesses~~controls ~~reported~~over byfinancial ~~our~~reporting ~~independent~~was ~~registered~~not ~~public~~effective ~~accounting~~as ~~firm~~of June 30, 2010.

~~· A lack of sufficient resources and an insufficient level of monitoring and oversight, which restricts the~~ The Company'’s ~~ability~~assessment toidentified ~~gather,~~certain ~~analyze~~material ~~and~~weaknesses ~~report~~which ~~information~~are ~~relative~~set to the financial statement assertions in a timely manner, including insufficient documentation and review of selection and application of generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions.forth below:

The Company currently has insufficient resources and an insufficient level of monitoring and oversight, which may restrict the Company's ability to gather, analyze and report information relative to the financial statements in a timely manner, including insufficient documentation and review of the selection and application of generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions. In addition, the limited size of the accounting department makes it impractical to achieve an optimum segregation of duties.

A lack of formal cash flow forecasts, business plans, and organizational structure documents to guide the employees in critical decision-making processes.

Ineffective controls over accounts payable processing

Ineffective controls over contract administration

Ineffective procedures to appropriately account for and report on related party transactions.

Ineffective documentation of certain transactions not completed on a timely basis.

~~Based~~· ~~on its~~The ~~evaluation~~limited ~~and~~size ~~due~~of to the ~~material~~accounting ~~weaknesses~~department ~~noted~~makes ~~above,~~it ~~our~~impracticable ~~management concluded~~to ~~that~~achieve ~~our~~an ~~internal~~appropriate ~~control~~segregation ~~over financial reporting was not effective as~~ of ~~June 30, 2009~~duties.

~~This Annual~~· ~~Report~~The Company does not ~~include~~have ana ~~attestation~~procedure ~~report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject~~ to ~~attestation~~ensure bythe ~~our registered~~timely ~~public~~issuance ~~accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules~~ of ~~the~~equity ~~Securities and~~securities ~~Exchange~~upon ~~Commission~~Board ~~that~~or ~~permit~~contractual ~~us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report~~approval.

~~The information~~· ~~set~~Payroll ~~forth~~and inincome ~~this~~tax ~~Item~~filings ~~9A(T)~~have ~~shall~~ not bebeen ~~considered~~made ~~filed under the Exchange Act~~timely. This annual report does not include an attestation report of Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Form 10-K.

There is insufficient supervision and review by our corporate management, particularly relating to complex transactions requiring to equity and debt instruments.

There is a lack of formal process and timeline for closing the books and records at the end of each reporting period.

There are limited processes and limited or no documentation in place for the identification and assessment of internal and external risks that would influence the success or failure of the achievement of entity-wide and activity-level objectives.

An officer of the Company has been utilizing his personal bank account to pay for Company expenses. These expenses are recorded via journal entry by the Company as a liability to the officer. Adequate documentation to support the business purpose of the expenses was not available for many of the amounts. In addition, the officer of the Company has been utilizing the Company’s bank account to pay personal expenses. The amounts paid are applied against the Company’s liability to the officer.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report herein.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses

The Company intends to take action to hire additional staff, implement stronger financial reporting systems and software and develop the adequate policies and procedures with said enhanced staff to ensure all noted material weaknesses are addressed and resolved. The Company also retained a third party consulting services to assist in developing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. However, due to the Company’s cash flow constraints and changes in the business requirements from the change in key relationships and lack of internal resources, the continued assistance from this consulting firm and the timing of implementing the adequate policies and procedures, as determined to be required, has not yet been determined. The Company cannot predict when it will be able to appropriately address such weaknesses.

6358

There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting in the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 910. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The Company's executive officers and directors and their positions with MSGI are as follows:

Name	Age		~~Positions and Offices, if any, Held~~	Positions and Offices, if any, Held	~~Director Since~~	Director Since
J. Jeremy Barbera and Chief Executive Officer	52		Chairman of the Board of Directors		1996
J. Jeremy Barbera		53		Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer		1996
Richard J. Mitchell, III and Secretary	50		Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer
Richard J. Mitchell, III		51		Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
Joseph C. Peters	52		President and Director		2004
Lt. Gen. James A. Abrahamson		77		Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors		2010
John T. Gerlach	77		Director		1997
Joseph C. Peters		53		President and Director		2004
Seymour Jones	78		Director		1996
John T. Gerlach		78		Director		1997
David C. Stoller	59		Director		2004
Seymour Jones		79		Director		1996
David C. Stoller		60		Director		2004

Mr. Barbera has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and its predecessor businesses since April 1997, and has served as Director and officer since October 1996 when MSGI Direct was acquired in an exchange of stock. He founded MSGI Direct in 1987, which was twice named to the Inc. 500 list of the fastest growing private companies in America. Mr. Barbera pioneered the practice of database marketing for the live entertainment industry in the 1980’s, achieving nearly one hundred percent market share in New York. Under his leadership, MSGI originated the business of web-based ticketing in 1995 and became the dominant services provider in every major entertainment market in North America. Their principal areas of concentration also included: financial services, fundraising and publishing. MSGI was named one of the 50 fastest growing public companies in both 2001 and 2002 by Crains New York Business. In April 2004, Mr. Barbera completed the divestiture of the legacy businesses and re-birthed the company in the homeland security industry as MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. Prior to founding MSGI Direct, Mr. Barbera was a research scientist based at NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, working on such groundbreaking missions as Pioneer Venus and the Global Atmospheric Research Program. Mr. Barbera has more than 20 years of experience in the areas of technology, marketing and database management services. Mr. Barbera is a Physicist educated at New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mr. Mitchell has been the Company's Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer since December 2003. Mr. Mitchell was appointed as Secretary by the Board of Directors of the Company in December 2006. Mr. Mitchell has been with the Company since May of 1999, when the former CMG Direct Corp. was acquired from CMGi, Inc. Mr. Mitchell has since served in a variety of positions for MSGI, including VP, Finance and Controller of CMG Direct Corp., VP, Finance for MKTG Services, Inc. and Senior V.P. and General Manager of MKTG Services Boston, Inc. Prior to joining the MSGI team, Mr. Mitchell served as a senior financial consultant to CMGi. During his tenure with CMGi, he participated on the Lycos IPO team, assisting in preparing Lycos for it's highly successful initial offering in April 1996. As a consultant to CMGi, Mr. Mitchell was also involved in corporate accounting and finance, including involvement in the formation of companies such as Navisite and Engage Technologies. In addition, Mr. Mitchell participated in the mergers and acquisition team of SalesLink, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMGi,where he assisted in the post-acquisition financial reporting systems migration and financial management of Pacific Link, a fulfillment operation located in Newark, CA. Mr. Mitchell performed a variety of financial management and accounting functions for Wheelabrator Technologies Inc., a $1.5 billion environmental services company, from 1987 through 1994. Those responsibilities included Northeast Regional Controller for the Wheelabrator Clean Water Corp. division, Corporate Director of Internal Audit and Corporate Accounting Manager. Mr. Mitchell graduated from the University of Massachusetts at Lowell with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting.

64Lieutenant General James A. Abrahamson, (retired USAF) has been Vice- Chairman of the MSGI Board of Directors since his appointment in 2010. From 1992 to 1995, Lt. Gen. Abrahamson served as Chairman of the Oracle Corporation. Prior to holding his Chairmanship at Oracle, he held the position of Executive Vice President for Corporate Development, and then President of the Transportation Sector, for Hughes Aircraft Company as well as a member of the Hughes Aircraft Company Board of Directors. While on active duty in the Air Force, Lt. Gen. Abrahamson became one of the military's most experienced program directors. He led the Strategic Defense Initiative (President Reagan's "Star Wars" Program) from April 1984 until he retired from the Air Force in January 1989, at the rank of Lieutenant General. He also directed the development of the F-16 Multi-National Fighter and served as the NASA Associate Administrator for Space Flight, managing NASA's Space Shuttle from its second flight through 10 safe and successful missions. Lt. Gen. Abrahamson currently serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of StratCom, LLC; SkySpectrum, LLC; and Sky Sentry, LLC. Each of these companies is associated with the development of airships for civil and military applications. He also serves as Chairman of the Board of GeoEye (NASDAQ: GEOY) and Chairman of the Board of Global Relief Technologies. Lt. Gen. Abrahamson earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Master of Science degree in the same field through the Air Force Institute of Technology program at the University of Oklahoma. He completed Squadron Officer School in 1958, Air Command and Staff College in 1966, the Air Force Test Pilot School in 1967, and the Industrial College of the Armed Forces in 1973. He served in the Air Force as a Test Pilot, Fighter Pilot, and Program Manager for 33 years, prior to moving to senior positions in civil industry.

Mr. Peters has served as President of the Company since November 2004 and has served as a Director of the Company since April 2004. Mr. Peters served President George W. Bush as the Assistant Deputy Director for State and Local Affairs of the White House's Drug Policy Office - commonly referred to as the Drug Czar's Office. There his duties included supervision of the country's High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Program. Mr. Peters also served as the Drug Czar's Liaison to the White House Office of Homeland Security and Governor Tom Ridge. Previously, Mr. Peters joined the Clinton White House, to direct the country's 26 HIDTA's, with an annual budget of a quarter billion dollars. Mr. Peters also represented the White House with police, prosecutors, governors, mayors and many non-governmental organizations. Mr. Peters began his career as a State prosecutor when he joined the Pennsylvania Attorney General's office in 1983. He later served as a Chief Deputy Attorney General of the Organized Crime Section, and in 1989 was named the first Executive Deputy Attorney General of the newly created Drug Law Division. In that capacity, Mr. Peters oversaw the activities of 56 operational drug task forces throughout the State, involving approximately 760 local police departments with 4,500 law enforcement officers. Mr. Peters consults to national and international law enforcement organizations on narco-terrorism and related intelligence and prosecution issues. He is an associate member of the Pennsylvania District Attorney's Association and a member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, where he sits on their Terrorism Committee. Mr. Peters has devoted his entire career to public service.

Mr. Gerlach has been a Director of the Company since December 1997. Mr. Gerlach is Chairman of the M&A Committee and a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of the Board of Directors. He is currently Senior Executive Professor with the graduate business program and Associate Professor of Finance at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, CT. Previously, Mr. Gerlach was a Director in Bear Stearns' corporate finance department, with responsibility for mergers and financial restructuring projects, President and Chief Operating Officer of Horn & Hardart and Founder and President of Consumer Growth Capital. Mr. Gerlach also serves as a director for Uno Restaurant Co., SAFE Inc., Cycergie (a French company), Akona Corp., and the Board of Regents at St. John's University in Collegeville, MN. Mr. Gerlach is also a member of an advisory board for Drexel University’s College of Business & Administration.

Mr. Jones has been a Director of the Company since June 1996 and is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Jones has been Professor of Accounting at New York University since September 1993. From April 1974 to September 1995, Mr. Jones was a senior partner of the accounting firm of Coopers and Lybrand, a legacy firm of PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. In addition to 40-plus years of accounting experience, Mr. Jones has more than ten years of experience as an arbitrator and an expert witness, particularly in the areas of fraud, mergers and acquisitions, and accounting matters. Mr. Jones also functions as a consultant to Milberg Factors Inc. and CHF Industries Inc., and serves as a director for Arotech Corporation.

Mr. Stoller has served as a Director of the Company since March 2004, and is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Stoller has been involved in public and private finance for the last 20 years. Mr. Stoller began his professional career as an attorney. He was partner and co-head of global finance for Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP where he helped build one of the world's largest and most successful finance practices, participating personally in financings totaling more than $4 billion. At the end of 1992, Mr. Stoller joined Charterhouse Group International, a large New York City-based private equity firm, as chairman of its Environmental Capital Group. In 1993, Mr. Stoller, through the Charterhouse Environmental Group, launched American Disposal Services, an integrated waste management company that ultimately acquired and consolidated, with $34 million in equity capital, more than 70 waste management companies, located principally in the Midwest. American Disposal had a successful initial public offering in July 1996, and shortly afterward, Mr. Stoller, still chairman, became a general partner at Charterhouse and actively participated in raising $1 billion for Charterhouse's third private equity fund. American Disposal was sold in 1998 to Allied Waste for a price exceeding $1.3 billion. In August of 1998, Mr. Stoller left Charterhouse to launch Americana Financial Services, raising over $25 million in private equity capital. Americana (now the American Wholesale Insurance Group) is currently one of the top five largest private wholesale insurance brokerages in the United States. In 2002, Mr. Stoller launched TransLoad America LLC, which is principally in the business of transloading and transporting waste materials by rail, with an initial focus on the northeastern section of the United States. Mr. Stoller holds a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, an M.A. from the Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Research, and a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law. He is also a graduate of the Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program.

Relationships and Interests in Proposals; Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. and no arrangements or understandings exist between any director or nominee and any other person pursuant to which such director or nominee was or is to be selected at the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders. No director or officer is party to any corporate relevant legal proceeding.

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that the Company's officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, file reports of ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the Commission and the NASDAQ Market. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by the Commission's regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.

Based solely on the Company's review of the copies of such forms it has received and written representations from certain reporting persons that they were not required to file reports on Form 5 for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the Company believes that all its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a written Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which complies with the requirements for a code of ethics pursuant to Item 406(b) of Regulation S-B under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct will be provided, without charge, to any shareholder who sends a written request to the Chief Accounting Officer of MSGI at 575 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022. Any substantive amendments to the code and any grant of a waiver from a provision of the code requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules will be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K.

Board of Directors and Committee Information

The Board of Directors of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. currently has two standing committees, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. As described below, the entire Board of Directors acts with respect to nomination and corporate governance matters.

Audit Committee

The Company's Board of Directors has established a standing audit committee, which is currently comprised of the following directors: Mr. Seymour Jones, Mr. John T. Gerlach and Mr. David C. Stoller. All members of the audit committee are non-employee directors and satisfy the current standards with respect to independence, financial expertise and experience. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Seymour Jones meets the Securities and Exchange Commission's definition of "audit committee financial expert."

Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2009 were Mr. Seymour Jones, Mr. Joseph Peters, and Mr. John Gerlach. Mr. Gerlach is Chairman of the Committee. Mr. Gerlach and Mr. Jones served as members of the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors during all of fiscal years ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009. Mr. Peters served as a member of the committee in fiscal year 2007. Mr. Peters was also an officer and employee of the Company during the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009.

Nomination Matters

The Board of Directors does not currently have a nominating committee or a committee performing similar functions. Given the size of the Company and the historic lack of director nominations by stockholders, the Board has determined that no such committee is necessary. Similarly, although the Company’s By-laws contain procedures for stockholder nominations, the Board has determined that adoption of a formal policy regarding the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders is not required. The Company intends to review periodically both whether a more formal policy regarding stockholder nominations should be adopted and whether a nominating committee should be established. Until such time as a nominating committee is established, the full Board, which includes two directors employed by the Company and therefore not “independent” under applicable standards, will participate in the consideration of candidates. The Board does not utilize a nominating committee charter when performing the functions of such committee. The procedures for stockholder nominations and the desired qualifications of candidates, among other nominations matters, did not change during the ~~2009~~2010 fiscal year.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following table provides certain information concerning compensation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and any other executive officer of the Company who received compensation in excess of $100,000 during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 (the "Named Executive Officers"):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

	Fiscal
Name and Principal	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,	Annual Salary		Annual Bonus		Stock Awards				Option Awards			Non-Equity Incentive Compensation		Non-qualified Deferred Compensation	All Other Compensation		Total
	Year															Non-Equity				Non-qualified
Position
Name and Principal	Ended	Annual			Annual				Stock				Option			Incentive				Deferred		All Other
J. Jeremy Barbera (1)	2010	$	500,000	—		$	—			$	—		—		—	—		$	500,000
Position	June 30,	Salary			Bonus				Awards				Awards			Compensation				Compensation		Compensation		Total
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer	2009		501,923	—			8,000	(3)			92,950	(4)	—		—	—			602,873
J. Jeremy Barbera (1)	2009	$	501,923			—			$	8,000	(3)		$	92,950	(4)		—				—		—	$	602873
Richard J. Mitchell III (2)	2010		125,000	—		—					4,573	(5)	—		—	—			129,573
Chairman of the	2008		497,200			—				30,600	(3)			185,900	(4)		—				—		—		713,700
Chief Accounting Officer Treasurer and Secretary	2009		125,481	—		—					35,590	(5)	—		—	—			161,071
Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Richard J. Mitchell III (2)	2009		125,481			—				—				35,590	(5)		—				—		—		161,071
Chief Accounting Officer	2008		125,000			—				—				74,000	(5)		—				—		—		199,000
Treasurer and Secretary

(1) As a result of limited cash availability during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010, Mr. Barbera has been paid only $~~307~~1,~~136~~505 of the annual salary accrued and reported for the year.

(2) As a result of limited cash availability during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010, Mr. Mitchell has been paid only $7732,~~388~~590 of the annual salary accrued and reported for the year.

(3) On May 7, 2007, the Board of Directors voted unanimously to authorize the issuance of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Barbera as an incentive to retain the services of Mr. Barbera. The shares are to be issued in three equal installments of 100,000 shares each over a period of three years. The first issuance of 100,000 shares occurred on May 7, 2007, the second issuance of 100,000 shares was earned on May 7, 2008 and the third issuance of 100,000 shares was earned on May 7, 2009. The shares are valued at each reporting period at the current market price for shares earned to date and once issued, the stock is valued at the current market price on the date of issuance. For fiscal 2008, there were 100,000 shares issued at a value of $0.63 per share and the remaining 100,000 shares not issued were valued at $0.43 for the portion of shares earned at June 30, 2008, resulting in an expense in fiscal 2008 of $30,600. The remaining 100,000 shares authorized were issued at a value of $0.08 per share for an expense of $8,000 during the year ended June 30, 2009.64

(43) ~~Represents~~ ~~options~~On May 7, 2007, the Board of Directors voted unanimously to ~~purchase~~authorize ~~200~~the issuance of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at to Mr. Barbera as an ~~exercise~~incentive ~~price~~to retain the services of $1Mr.50 ~~per share~~Barbera. ~~Options~~The ~~were~~shares are to be issued onin ~~June~~three ~~29,~~equal ~~2007~~installments ~~and expire~~of 10100,000 ~~years~~shares ~~from~~each ~~the~~over ~~date~~a period of ~~issuance~~three years. The ~~dollar~~first ~~amount~~issuance ~~presented represents~~of 100,000 shares occurred on May 7, 2007, the ~~expense~~second ~~each~~issuance ~~year~~of as100,000 ~~recognized~~shares ~~under~~was ~~SFAS~~earned ~~123R.~~on ~~The~~May ~~overall~~7, ~~fair value~~2008 and the third issuance of ~~these~~100,000 shares was ~~$278~~earned on May 7, 2009. 100,000 ~~which~~shares isauthorized ~~based~~were onissued at a ~~fair~~ value of $10.3908 per share~~. This~~ ~~fair~~for ~~value~~an ~~was~~expense ~~estimated~~of ~~using~~$8,000 ~~the~~during ~~Black-Scholes option pricing model with~~ the ~~following~~year ~~assumptions applied;~~ended ~~dividend~~June ~~yield of zero~~30, ~~expected~~2009. ~~volatility~~The offinal ~~142.3%~~100,000 ~~risk-free interest~~have ~~rate~~not ofyet ~~4.75%~~been issued and an ~~expected~~accrued ~~lifeof~~liability 6of ~~years.~~$8,000 ~~The~~for ~~expense~~the isfair ~~being amortized~~market ~~over~~value ~~a period~~ of ~~1.5~~these ~~years,~~shares ~~which~~has isbeen ~~the~~realized ~~vesting~~as ~~term~~ of ~~the options.~~June 30, 2010

67(4) Represents options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. Options were issued on June 29, 2007 and expire 10 years from the date of issuance. The dollar amount presented represents the expense each year as recognized under SFAS 123R. The overall fair value of these shares was $278,000 which is based on a fair value of $1.39 per share. This fair value was estimated using the Black—Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions applied; dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 142.3%, risk—free interest rate of 4.75% and an expected life of 6 years. The expense is being amortized over a period of 1.5 years, which is the vesting term of the options.

(5)

Represents options to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.40 per share, 50,000 shares at $1.50 per share and 7,500 shares at $1.50 per share. Options were issued on May 7, 2007, June 29, 2007 and February 7, 2005, respectively, and expire 10 years from the dates of issuance. The dollar amount presented represents the expense for each fiscal year under SFAS 123R for options currently vesting. The fair value of the May 7 grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions applied; dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 140.9%, risk-free interest rate of 4.75% and an expected life of 6 years. The fair value of the June 29 grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions applied; dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 142.3%, risk-free interest rate of 4.75% and an expected life of 6 years.

STOCK OPTION GRANTS

The Company ~~maintains~~maintained a qualified stock option plan (the "1999 Plan") for the issuance of up to 1,125,120 shares of common stock under qualified and non-qualified stock options. As ~~The~~of June 30, 2010 the 1999 ~~Plan~~plan is closed and no further options may be issued under its terms. The 1999 Plan was administered by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors, which ~~has~~ had the authority to determine which officers and key employees of the Company will be granted options, the option price and vesting of the options. Of the 1,125,120 shares qualified under the 1999 Plan, 985,000 were issued prior to its expiration. In no event shall an option expire more than ten years after the date of grant.

~~There were no options granted in the fiscal years 2009 or 2008.~~65

There were no options granted in the fiscal years 2010 or 2009.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth certain information regarding unexercised options, unvested stock and equity incentive plan awards for each Named Executive Officer outstanding as of the end of the Company’s fiscal year 2009:

	Option Awards											Stock Awards
																		Equity
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable			Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable			Equity Incentive Plan Awards Number of Securites Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
																Equity		Incentive
							Equity									Incentive		Plan
							Incentive									Plan Awards:		Awards:
							Plan							Market		Number of		Market or
							Awards					Number of		Value of		Unearned		Payout Value
	Number of			Number of			Number of					Shares		Shares or		Shares,		of Unearned
	Securities			Securities			Securites					or Units		Units of		Units or		Shares, Units
	Underlying			Underlying			Underlying		Option			of Stock		Stock That		Other Rights		or Other
	Unexercised			Unexercised			Unexercised		Exercise		Option	That Have		Have Not		That Have		Rights That
	Options (#)			Options (#)			Unearned		Price		Expiration	Not Vested		Vested		Not Vested		Have Not
Name	Exercisable			Unexercisable			Options (#)		($)		Date	(#)		($)		($)		Vested ($)
J. Barbera		100,000	(1)		—			—		1.50	3/24/14		—		—		—		—
		200,000	(2)		—			—		1.50	3/24/14		—		—		—		—
		200,000	(3)		—			—		1.50	6/29/17		—		—		—		—
R. Mitchell		10,000	(4)		—			—		1.50	3/24/14		—		—		—		—
		16,666	(5)		8,334	(5)		—		1.40	5/07/17		—		—		—		—
		25,000	(5)		—			—		1.40	5/07/17		—		—		—		—
		50,000	(6)		—			—		1.50	6/29/17		—		—		—		—

(1)	Represents grant of options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share, vested immediately, with a term of 10 years.

(2)	Represents a grant of options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per share, vested over three years on each anniversary date of the grant, with a term of 10 years.

(3)	Represents a grant of 200,000 options to purchase common stock at $1.50 per shares, vested equally over 18 months, with a term of 10 years.

(4)	Represents a grant of 10,000 options to purchase common stock at $1.50 per shares, vested over three years on each anniversary date with a term of 10 years.

(5)	Represents a grant of 25,000 options to purchase common stock at $1.40 per shares, vested over three years on each anniversary date of the grant, with a term of 10 years.

(6)	Represents a grant of 50,000 options to purchase common stock at $1.50 per shares, vested equally over 18 months, with a term of 10 years.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

	Number of securities				Number of Securities
Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of Securities remaining available for future issuances under equity compensation plans
	to be issued upon		Weighted-average		remaining available
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1999 Stock Option Plan (1)		985,000	$	1.94		—
	exercise of		exercise price of		for future issuances
	outstanding options,		outstanding options,		under equity
Plan Category	warrants and rights		warrants and rights		compensation plans
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
1999 Stock Option Plan (1)		985,000	$	1.94		140,122
Executive Options (1)		40,000	$	2.81		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		1,025,000	$	1.97		~~140,122~~—

(1) The Company maintains a qualified stock option plan (the "1999 Plan") for the issuance of up to 1,125,120 shares of common stock under qualified and non-qualified stock options. The plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors which has the authority to determine which officers and key employees of the Company will be granted options, the option price and vesting of the options.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Beginning in October 2003, directors who are not employees of the Company receive an annual retainer fee of $5,000, $1,000 for each Board Meeting attended, $500 for each standing committee meeting attended and $500 for each standing committee meeting for the Chairman of such Committee. Such Directors will also be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses for attending board and committee meetings, and will receive an annual grant of options on June 30 of each year to acquire 10,000 shares of common stock for each fiscal year of service, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. Any Director who is also an employee of the Company is not entitled to any compensation or reimbursement of expenses for serving as a Director of the Company or a member of any committee thereof. The Directors agreed to waive the annual option grant for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. The annual options grants previously waived were issued on June 29, 2007. The Directors agreed to waive the annual option grant for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009.

~~The following table sets forth certain information regarding all compensation earned by directors for the Company’s 2009 fiscal year.~~67

69The following table sets forth certain information regarding all compensation earned by directors for the

											Nonqualified
	Fees Earned								Non-Equity		Deferred
	or Paid in			Stock		Option			Incentive Plan		Compensation		All Other
	Cash			Awards		Awards			Compensation		Earnings		Compensation		Total
Name	($)			($)		($)			($)		($)		($)		($)
J. Gerlach	$	10,000	(1)		—	$	35,590	(2)		—		—		—	$	45,590
S. Jones	$	8,500	(1)		—		35,590	(2)		—		—		—	$	44,090
D. Stoller	$	8,500	(1)		—		35,590	(2)		—		—		—	$	44,090

Company’s 2010 fiscal year.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)			Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
J. Gerlach	$	9,000	(1)		—		—		—		—		—	$	9,000
S. Jones	$	7,500	(1)		—		—		—		—		—	$	7,500
D. Stoller	$	7,500	(1)		—		—		—		—		—	$	7,500

(1)	Represents compensation of an annual retainer fee of $5,000, $1,000 for each Board Meeting attended, $500 for each standing committee meeting attended and $500 for each standing committee meeting for the Chairman of such Committee.

(2) Represents the expense for the fiscal year under SFAS 123R for options currently vesting. Includes options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. Options were issued on June 29, 2007 and expire 10 years from the date of issuance. The overall fair value of these shares was $69,500 which is based on a fair value of $1.39 per share that was estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing model. These options vest over 1.5 years.

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment

The Company had entered into employment agreements with only one of its Named Executive Officers.

Mr. Barbera was appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company by the Board, effective March 31, 1997. Mr. Barbera had previously also served as President and CEO of MSGI Direct. Mr. Barbera formerly held an employment agreement which was effective January 1, 2005 for a three-year-term expiring December 31, 2008. The base salary during the employment term is $500,000 for the first year and an amount not less than $500,000 for the remaining two years. Mr. Barbera was eligible to receive bonuses equal to 100% of the base salary each year at the determination of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, based on earnings and other targeted criteria. Mr. Barbera reduced his salary to $350,000 from January 1, 2005 through March 2007. In April 2007, Mr. Barbera’s annual salary was returned to the contractually obligated level of $500,000. On June 29, 2007, Mr. Barbera was granted stock options to purchase 200,000 shares of Common Stock of the company at $1.50 per share. These options vest in equal installments over an 18 month period beginning one month from the date of issuance. If Mr. Barbera was terminated without cause (as defined in the agreement), then the Company was to pay him a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times the compensation paid during the preceding 12 months and all outstanding stock options shall fully vest and become immediately exercisable. Mr. Barbera is currently without an executed employment agreement, but continues his employment under the terms comparable to the pervious agreement.

Mr. Barbera has agreed in his prior employment agreement (i) not to compete with the Company or its subsidiaries, or to be associated with any other similar business during the employment term, except that he may own up to 5% of the outstanding common stock of certain corporations, as described more fully in the employment agreement, and (ii) upon termination of employment with the Company and its subsidiaries, not to solicit or encourage certain clients of the Company or its subsidiaries to cease doing business with the Company and its subsidiaries and not to do business with any other similar business for a period of three years from the date of such termination.

COMPENSATION POLICIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Compensation Committee desires to set compensation at levels through arrangements that will attract and retain managerial talent desired by us, reward employees for past contributions and motivate managerial efforts consistent with corporate growth, strategic progress and the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that a mix of salary, incentive bonus and stock options will achieve those objectives.

RELATIONSHIP OF PERFORMANCE TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The base salary of Mr. Barbera is not set by terms of an employment agreement, but is comparable to his prior effective emplyment agreement and is maintained at such level as to attract and retain him. The Compensation Committee believes this salary is competitive and represents a fair estimate of the value of the services rendered by Mr. Barbera.

Respectively submitted,

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

John T. Gerlach

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners ~~andManagement~~and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Common Stock – Five Percent Holders

~~The following~~As ~~table sets forth, as~~ of ~~September 30, 2009, certain information with~~the ~~respect~~date toof ~~any~~this ~~person~~filing, ~~including~~there ~~any~~are ~~group,~~no ~~who is~~ known toshareholders ~~the~~holding ~~Company~~a topercentage beequal ~~the~~to ~~beneficial~~or ~~owner~~greater ~~of more~~ than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company.

Title of	Name and Address of	Amount and Nature of		Percent of
Class	Beneficial Owner	Beneficial Owner (1)		Class
Common	Carta De Dinero, LLC		3,000,000		7.63	%
Common	Leon Frenkel		3,024,186		7.69	%
Common	Bespoke Growth Partners , Inc.		2,200,000		5.60	%

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such person’s name. With respect to each person or group, percentages are calculated based on the number of shares beneficially owned, including shares that may be acquired by such person or group within 60 days of September 30, 2009 upon the exercise of stock options, warrants or other purchase rights, but not the exercise of options, warrants or other purchase rights held by any other person.

Common Stock – Management

The following table sets forth, as of September 30, ~~2009~~2010, certain information certain information concerning the ownership of the Company’s common stock of each (i) director, (ii) nominee, (iii) executive officers and former executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and referred to as the “Named Executive Officers,” and (iv) all current directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Beneficial Ownership (1)		Percent of Class
Common	J. Jeremy Barbera (2) 575 Madison Ave New York, NY 10022		1,300,000		1.58	%
Common	Seymour Jones (3) 575 Madison Ave New York, NY 10022		144,221		*

Common	John Gerlach (4) 575 Madison Ave New York, NY 10022		145,395		*

Common	David Stoller (5) 575 Madison Ave New York, NY 10022		101,250		*

Common	Joseph Peters (6) 575 Madison Ave New York, NY 10022		327,400		*

Common	Richard Mitchell (7) 575 Madison Ave New York, NY 10022		169,200		*

All Directors and Named Executive Officers reported as a group			2,187, 466		2.65	%

Title of	Name and Address of			Percent of
Class	Beneficial Owner	Beneficial Ownership (1)		Class
Common	J. Jeremy Barbera (2)		1,300,000		3.33	%
	575 Madison Ave
	New York, NY 10022
Common	Seymour Jones (3)		144,221		*
	575 Madison Ave
	New York, NY 10022
Common	John Gerlach (4)		145,395		*
	575 Madison Ave
	New York, NY 10022
Common	David Stoller (5)		101,250		*
	575 Madison Ave
	New York, NY 10022
Common	Joseph Peters (6)		327,400		*
	575 Madison Ave
	New York, NY 10022
Common	Richard Mitchell (7)		169,200		*
	575 Madison Ave
	New York, NY 10022
All Directors and Named Executive Officers			2,187,466		5.60	%
reported as a group

*	Less than 1%

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated in these footnotes, each stockholder has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned. All share amounts reflect beneficial ownership determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. All information with respect to beneficial ownership has been furnished by the respective Director, executive officer or stockholder, as the case may be. Except as otherwise noted, each person has an address in care of the Company.

(2) Includes (i) 415,000 issued upon conversion of Series G Convertible Preferred Shares, (ii) 200,000 issued as retention incentive, (iii) 185,000 shares previously owned and purchased on the open market and (iv) 500,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. With respect to the options to purchase shares of common stock, all are exercisable at September 30, ~~2009~~2010.

(3) Includes (i) 5,292 shares previously owned and purchased on the open market, (ii) 28,929 shares issued to director as compensation and (ii) 110,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. With respect to the options to purchase shares of common stock, all are exercisable at September 30, ~~2008~~2010.

(4) Includes (i) 3,609 shares previously owned and purchased on the open market (ii) 31,786 shares issued to director as compensation and (iii) 110,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. With respect to the options to purchase shares of common stock, all are exercisable at September 30, ~~2008~~2010.

(5) Includes (i) 31,250 shares issued to director as compensation and (ii) 70,000 options to purchase shares of common stock, all are exercisable at September 30, ~~2008~~2010.

(6) Includes (i) 143,000 issued upon conversion of Series G Convertible Preferred Shares, (ii) 25,000 issued as retention incentive, (iii) 9,400 shares previously owned and purchased on the open market and (iv) 150,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. With respect to the options to purchase shares of common stock, all are exercisable at September 30, ~~2008~~2010.

(7) Includes (i) 84,200 issued upon conversion of Series G Convertible Preferred Shares and (ii) 85,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. With respect to the options to purchase shares of common stock, ~~76,666~~all are exercisable at September 30, ~~2008~~2010.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

On February 9, 2009, Mr. J. Jeremy Barbera, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of MSGI entered into a 90-day bridge loan agreement with a lender yielding net proceeds of $240,000. Certain personal assets of Mr. Barbera were used as senior collateral. The Company also provided a full guarantee and certain Company assets were used as junior collateral. The Board of Directors of the Company approved the transaction during a meeting held on February 6, 2009. The net proceeds of the bridge loan were advanced by Mr. Barbera to the Company to be used primarily for a new business venture with NASA on behalf of the Company as well as to meet short-term working capital requirements of the Company. The Company has given no consideration to Mr. Barbera for this personal guarantee of the bridge loan. During the period ended June 30, 2009, the lender made claim of default on the loan by Mr. Barbera. As a result, the Company forfeited the assets committed as junior collateral. Mr. Barbera also forfeited certain personal assets. Upon delivery of the committed assets from the Company, the lender provided Mr. Barbera with extended terms for the payment of the principal and accrued interest. The Company has determined that there is no liability required as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, as the committed assets have been provided to the lender and there is no longer a standing guarantee by the Company.

~~Relationship with The National Aeronautics and Space Administration:~~70

In September 2009, the Company announced the formation of its second subsidiary for NASA based technology. Andromeda Energy Inc. (Andromeda) will be focused on scalable alternative energy solutions employing NASA developed nanotechnology. These technologies operate more efficiently that current technologies and therefore yield significantly lower electricity costs per watt than conventional energy systems and sources. The Company is already in receipt of several expressions of interest for partnerships in the planned deployment of this new technology, primarily from various major corporations located in the People’s Republic of China.

Relationships with Hyundai Syscomm Corp. and Apro Media Corp.:

Hyundai

The Company’s relationship with Hyundai Syscomm Corp. (Hyundai) began in September 2006 when the Company entered into a License Agreement with Hyundai in consideration of a one-time $500,000 fee. Under the agreement, MSGI granted to Hyundai a non-exclusive worldwide perpetual unlimited source, development and support license, for the use of the technology developed and owned by MSGI’s majority-owned subsidiary, Innalogic, LLC.

In October 2006, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Hyundai for the issuance of 900,000 shares of the Company's common stock, in connection with the receipt of the $500,000 received for the License Agreement above, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Subscription Agreement. The Company issued 865,000 shares of common stock at the initial closing of the transaction, and the remaining 35,000 shares of common stock remain to be issued.

In October 2006, the Company also entered into a Sub-Contracting Agreement with Hyundai. The Sub-Contracting Agreement allows for MSGI and its affiliates to participate in contracts that Hyundai and/or its affiliates now have or may obtain hereafter, where the Company's products and/or services for encrypted wired or wireless surveillance systems or perimeter security would enhance the value of the contract(s) to Hyundai or its affiliates. The initial term of the Sub-Contracting Agreement is three years, with subsequent automatic one-year renewals unless the Sub-Contracting Agreement is terminated by either party under the terms allowed by the Agreement.

In May 2009, the Company engaged the law firm of GCA Law Partners LLP (GCA), of Mountain View, California, to represent the Company in potential legal action against Hyundai and others. Subsequently, the Company, through GCA, filed suit in United States District Court, Northern District of California, naming Hyundai, among others, as a defendant. The Company seeks restitution for breach of contract, among other allegations.

Apro

On May 10, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive sub-contract and distribution agreement with Apro Media Corp. (Apro or Apro Media) for at least $105 million of expected sub-contracting business over seven years to provide commercial security services to a Fortune 100 defense contractor. Under the terms of contract, MSGI acquires components from Korea and delivers fully integrated security solutions at an average expected level of $15 million per year for the length of the seven-year engagement. MSGI is to establish and operate a 24/7/365 customer support facility in the Northeastern United States. Apro will provide MSGI with a web-based interface to streamline the ordering process and create an opportunity for other commercial security clients to be acquired and serviced by MSGI. The contract calls for gross profit margins estimated to be between 26% and 35% including a profit sharing arrangement with Apro Media, which will initially take the form of unregistered MSGI common stock, followed by a combination of stock and cash and eventually just cash. In the aggregate, assuming all the revenue targets are met over the next seven years, Apro Media would eventually acquire approximately 15.75 million shares of MSGI common stock. MSGI was referred to Apro Media by Hyundai as part of a general expansion into the Asian security market, however revenue under the Apro contract does not constitute revenue under the existing Hyundai agreements to acquire common stock of MSGI. The contract required working capital of at least $5 million due to considerable upfront expenses including a $2.5 million payment by MSGI to Apro Media, which was made on May 31, 2007, for the proprietary system development requirements of a Fortune 100 client and the formation of a staffed production and customer service facility and warehouse.

Per the terms of the sub-contract agreement with Apro, the Company is to compensate Apro with 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock when the sub-contract transactions result in $10.0 million of GAAP recognized revenue for the Company. During the year ended June 30, 2008 the Company recognized approximately $3.8 million in revenues resulting from activities under the sub-contract agreement. In December 2007, the Company elected to issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Apro pursuant to this agreement. The Company computed a fair value for a pro rata share of the remaining shares to be issued under that agreement, which was $62,336 at June 30, 2008 and has been reflected as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet. The total expense for the year ended June 30, 2008 related to shares both issued and issuable to Apro was approximately $1.1 million. This liability will be re-measured at each period end, until all shares are issued.

The Company had additional shipments and corresponding billings to clients in the aggregate of approximately $1.6 million resulting from activities under the Apro sub-contract agreement during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. These shipments have not been reported as revenue during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 due to issues surrounding collectibility of payment and other factors and therefore, these transactions did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition as of June 30, 2008. In addition, the billings have been reversed and are not reflected as of June 30, 2008. These shipments will be recognized as revenue if the payments are received, and therefore all the revenue recognition criteria is fully met. Inventory costs related to these transactions have been reported on the balance sheet in Costs of product shipped to customers for which revenue has not been recognized.

Subsequent to the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company negotiated an acceleration to the sub-contract agreements with Hirsch Capital Corp., the private equity firm operating both Hyundai and Apro. Under the accelerated terms, the Company expects to increase its business with Apro by supporting several of the largest commercial businesses in Korea with products and services. The Company also expects that this renewed relationship will bring additional sales to a certain Fortune 100 defense contractor as well. As part of this business expansion, the Company expects to become the beneficiary of various technology transfers including, but not limited to, Hi-Definition video surveillance systems, Hi-Definition digital video recording devices and emerging RFID technology. The Company has $400,000 of product shipments to Hirsch Group, LLLP, an affiliate of this private equity firm, as well as has shipped an additional $4,000,000 of product under agreements and referrals from Hirsch Group, LLLP during fiscal 2008. However, none of these shipments have been reported as revenue, as discussed above. The Company considers these contracts to be null and void.

Relationship with Coda Octopus Group, Inc.:

On April 1, 2007 the Company, through its majority-owned subsidiary Innalogic, entered into a non-exclusive License Agreement with the Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. This agreement allows for CODA to market the Innalogic, LLC “SafetyWatch” technology to its client base, sub-license the Technology to its customers and distributors, use the Technology for the purposes of demonstration to potential customers, sub-licensors and/or distributors and to further develop the source code of the Technology as it sees fit. In return, CODA will pay a 20% royalty to MSGI from the sale of the Technology to its customers, and further CODA has assumed certain development and operational activities of Innalogic in connection with this transaction. During 2007, the Company issued 850,000 unregistered common shares to CODA as payment of amounts due to CODA for advancing funds to us.

The Company has recognized $100,000 in revenues during the year ended June 30, 2008 as a result of this license agreement. No such revenues were recognized during the year ended June 30, 2009.

Item 14. Principle Accountant Fees and Services

~~The~~On August ~~aggregate~~19, ~~fees~~2010, ~~billed~~the byCompany terminated the services of Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP ~~independent~~(AP&M) as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. ~~accountants~~As AP&M, ~~for~~the ~~professional~~firm ~~services~~served ~~rendered~~as tothe ~~MSGI~~Company’s ~~Security~~Independent ~~Solutions,~~Registered ~~Inc~~Public ~~during~~Accounting Firm for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009, and ~~2008~~for ~~were~~the ~~comprised~~first, second and third quarters of the ~~following:~~fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The decision to terminate the services of AP&M was approved by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

	Fiscal Year		Fiscal Year
	2009		2008
Audit Fees	$	110,800	$	325,200
Tax Fees		—		3,225
All other Fees		—		—
Total Fees	$	110,800	$	328,425

On August 19, 2010, the Company, with the approval of the Audit Committee, engaged L J Soldinger Associates LLC (“LJSA”) as the Company’s new independent accountants.

75The aggregate fees billed by LJSA and AP&M as independent accountants, for professional services rendered to MSGI Security Solutions, Inc during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were comprised of the following:

	Fiscal Year 2010		Fiscal Year 2009
Audit Fees	$	80,000	$	110,800
Tax Fees		—		—
All other Fees		—		—
Total Fees	$	80,000	$	110,800

Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for each year and reviews of our unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements, as well as fees related to consents and reports in connection with regulatory filings for those fiscal years.

~~Tax fees~~The ~~related~~Company's ~~primarily~~Audit toCommittee ~~tax~~pre-approves ~~compliance~~all ~~and~~services ~~advisory~~provided ~~services~~by ~~for~~L ~~federal~~J Soldinger Associates and ~~state tax~~Amper, ~~returns~~Politziner ~~for~~& ~~2008.~~Mattia, LLP

~~The Company's Audit Committee pre-approves all services provided by Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP~~71

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits

21		List of Company's subsidiaries
23.1		Consent of ~~Amper,~~L ~~Politziner~~J &Soldinger ~~Mattia, LLP~~Associates
31.1		Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certifications of the Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certifications of the Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

7672

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. (Registrant) By: /s/ J. Jeremy Barbera J. Jeremy Barbera Chief Executive Officer By: /s/ Richard J. Mitchell III Richard J. Mitchell III Chief Accounting Officer and Principle Financial Officer

	MSGI SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. (Registrant)

Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ J. Jeremy Barbera
		J. Jeremy Barbera
		Chief Executive Officer


	By:	/s/ Richard J. Mitchell, III
		Richard J. Mitchell III
		Chief Accounting Officer and Principle Financial Officer

Date: October 13, 2009

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ J. Jeremy Barebera	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive	October 13, 2009
/s/ J. Jeremy Barbera	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive	November 15, 2010
J. Jeremy Barbera	Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/John T. Gerlach	Director	October 13, 2009
/s/ James A. Abrahamson	Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors	November 15, 2010
James A. Abrahamson
/s/ John T. Gerlach	Director	November 15, 2010
John T. Gerlach
/s/Seymour Jones	Director	October 13, 2009
/s/ Seymour Jones	Director	November 15, 2010
Seymour Jones
/s/Joseph Peters	Director	October 13, 2009
/s/ Joseph Peters	Director	November 15, 2010
Joseph Peters
/s/David Stoller	Director	October 13, 2009
/s/ David Stoller	Director	November 15, 2010
David Stoller

7773

Filing Compare · MSGI TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC