UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to _____________

Commission file number: 000-52285

TIA II, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		51-0597955
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)

58 Heng Shan Road, Kun Lun Shopping Mall,		150090
Harbin, People’s Republic of China		(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

+86-451-8233-5794

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ¨ No ¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

As of June 20, 2011, there are 1,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

TIA II, INC.

INDEX

		Page(s)
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

	Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).	3

	Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and September 30, 2010.	3

	Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the Period from August 17, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Unaudited).	4

	Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the Period from August 17, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Unaudited).	5

	Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the Period from August 17, 2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2010 (Unaudited).	6

	Notes to Financial Statements.	7

	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and results of Operations.	12

	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	16

	Item 4. Controls and Procedures.	16

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	17

	Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	17

	Item 1A. Risk Factors.	17

	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	17

	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	17

	Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).	17

	Item 5. Other Information.	17

	Item 6. Exhibits.	17

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements. (Unaudited)

TIA II, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2010			September 30, 2010
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS
Cash	$	-		$	-

TOTAL ASSETS	$	-		$	-

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	8,400		$	3,700
Advances - related party		27,671			27,671
TOTAL LIABILITIES		36,071			31,371

STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY:
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized, 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding.		100			100
Additional paid in capital		41,295			41,295
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(77,466	)		(72,766	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY		(36,071	)		(31,371	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY	$	(36,071	)	$	(31,371	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

TIA II, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

							For the period
	For the Three			For the Three			from August 17,
	Months			Months			2006 (Date of
	Ended			Ended			Inception) to
	December			December			December
	31, 2010			31, 2009			31, 2010

REVENUES	$	-		$	-		$	-

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES		(4,700	)		(3,000	)		(77,466	)

NET LOSS	$	(4,700	)	$	(3,000	)	$	(77,466	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED		1,000,000			1,000,000
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

TIA II, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIENCY

FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 17, 2006 (DATE OF INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010

							Accumulated
							Deficit
					Additional		During the			Total
	Common Stock				Paid in		Development			Stockholder’s
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage			Deficiency
Balance at August 17, 2006 (Date of Inception)		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Common shares issued on August 28, 2006 at $0.0001 per share		1,000,000		100		-		-			100
Net loss for the period ended September 30, 2006		-		-		-		(365	)		(365	)
Balance at September 30, 2006		1,000,000		100		-		(365	)		(265	)
Imputed interest on advance from related parties		-		-		932		-			932
Net loss for the period ended September 30, 2007		-		-		-		(19,077	)		(19,077	)
Balance at September 30, 2007		1,000,000		100		932		(19,442	)		(18,410	)
Imputed interest on advance from related parties		-		-		1,426		-			1,426
Net loss for the period ended September 30, 2008		-		-		-		(19,427	)		(19,427	)
Balance at September 30, 2008		1,000,000		100		2,358		(38,869	)		(36,411	)
Imputed interest on advance from related parties		-		-		976		-			976
Advances payable—related party contributed as capital		-		-		37,961		-			37,961
Net loss for the period ended September 30, 2009		-		-		-		(21,022	)		(21,022	)
Balance at September 30, 2009		1,000,000		100		41,295		(59,891	)		(18,496	)
Net loss for the period ended September 30, 2010		-		-		-		(12,875	)		(12,875	)
Balance at September 30, 2010		1,000,000		100		41,295		(72,766	)		(31,371	)
Net loss for the period ended December 31, 2010 (Unaudited)								(4,700	)		(4,700	)
Balance at December 31, 2010 (Unaudited)		1,000,000	$	100	$	41,295	$	(77,466	)	$	(36,071	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

TIA II, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

				For the Three			For the period
				Months			from August 17,
	For the Three Months			Ended			2006 (Date of
	Ended			December 31,			Inception) to
	December 31, 2010			2009			December 31, 2010

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(4,700	)	$	(3,000	)	$	(77,466	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		4,700			500			7,034
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		-			(2,500	)		(70,432	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the sale of common stock		-			-			100
Proceeds from related party					2,500			65,632
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		-			2,500			65,732

NET DECREASE IN CASH		-			-			-
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		-			-			-
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	-		$	-		$	-

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Advance-Related party contributed to capital	$	-		$	-		$	37,961

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

TIA II, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - Organization, Business and Operations

Tia II, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on August 17, 2006, with an objective to acquire, or merge with, an operating business. As of December 30, 2010, the Company had not yet commenced any operations.

The Company, based on proposed business activities, is a "blank check" company. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) defines such a company as “a development stage company” that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person; and is issued ‘penny stock,’ as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of "blank check" companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in its securities, either debt or equity, until the Company concludes a business combination.

The Company was organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation and, to a lesser extent that desires to employ the Company’s funds in its business. The Company’s principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business (“Business Combination”) rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Company will not restrict its potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business. The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the officers and directors of the Company.

Until a Business Combination is completed, the sole stockholder has agreed to fund the Company’s operating costs through the earlier of a Business Combination or December 31, 2010. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully complete a Business Combination.

On December 8, 2008, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) whereby the holder (the “Seller”) of all the common stock of the Company sold their shares to an individual (the “Buyer”) who is now in control of the Company. The Buyer subsequent to the Purchase agreement was appointed by the board of directors as the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary and sole director pursuant to a written consent of directors. The Seller in conjunction with the Purchase Agreement resigned as the Company’s director, President and Secretary.

NOTE 2 - Development Stage Company

The Company has not generated significant revenues to date; accordingly, the Company is considered a development stage enterprise as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 7, "Accounting and Reporting for Development Stage Companies." The Company is subject to a number of risks similar to those of other companies in an early stage of development.

NOTE 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has a working capital deficiency of $36,071 and an accumulated deficit of $77,466 as of December 31, 2010 and has incurred significant losses since inception. Further losses are anticipated in the development of an intended business plan. If the Company is unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable, the business and future success may be adversely affected. Given the Company's limited operating history, lack of sales, and its operating losses, there can be no assurance that it will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company will depend almost exclusively on outside capital to complete the development of a business plan. Such outside capital will include proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and may include commercial borrowing. There can be no assurance that capital will be available as necessary to meet these development costs or, if the capital is available, that it will be on terms acceptable to the Company.

The issuances of additional equity securities by the Company may result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of its current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase the Company's liabilities and future cash commitments.

Unaudited financial statements

The accompanying financial statements as of December 31, 2010, and for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from August 17, 2006 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) have been made to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted. However, The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year ended September 30, 2011, or that which was achieved in the year ended September 30, 2010.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Loss Per Common Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for all periods presented.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As of January 1, 2008, the Company adopted on a prospective basis certain required provisions of Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements.” Those provisions relate to the Company’s financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and the Company’s fair value disclosures related to financial assets and liabilities. Topic 820 defines fair value, expands related disclosure requirements and specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the nature of the inputs used to develop the fair value measures. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs to fair value measurements - Level 1, meaning the use of quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; Level 2, meaning the use of quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or are directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, meaning the use of unobservable inputs. Observable market data should be used when available.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts payable and amounts due to related party approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. Virtually all of the Company’s valuation measurements are Level 1 measurements. The adoption of Topic 820 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Subsequent Events

For purposes of determining whether a post-balance sheet event should be evaluated to determine whether it has an effect on the financial statements for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, subsequent events were evaluated by the Company as of the date on which the audited financial statements were available to be issued.

Recent Accounting Standards

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01- Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. The amendments in this Update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this ASU has had minimal to no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this Update affect accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity. The amendments also affect accounting and reporting by an entity that exchanges a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for an equity interest in another entity. The amendments in this update are effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” If an entity has previously adopted SFAS No. 160 as of the date the amendments in this update are included in the Accounting Standards Codification, the amendments in this update are effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopted SFAS No. 160. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarifies existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to clarify the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Specifically, only one form of embedded credit derivative qualifies for the exemption – one that is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. This guidance also has transition provisions, which permit entities to make a special one-time election to apply the fair value option to any investment in a beneficial interest in securitized financial assets, regardless of whether such investments contain embedded derivative features. This guidance is effective on the first day of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption was permitted at the beginning of any fiscal quarter beginning after March 5, 2010. The adoption of this guidance had minimal to no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2010, FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement regarding the effect of denominating the exercise price of a share-based payment awards in the currency of the market in which the underlying equity securities trades and that currency is different from (1) entity’s functional currency, (2) functional currency of the foreign operation for which the employee provides services, and (3) payroll currency of the employee. The guidance clarifies that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should be considered an equity award assuming all other criteria for equity classification are met. The pronouncement will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010, and will be applied prospectively. Affected entities will be required to record a cumulative catch-up adjustment for all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the annual period in which the guidance is adopted. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Update No. 2010-17, or ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method, which updates the guidance currently included under topic 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining the milestone and determining when the use of the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions is appropriate. It provides criteria for evaluating if the milestone is substantive and clarifies that a vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved, if the milestone meets all the criteria to be considered substantive. ASU 2010-17 is effective for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after June 15, 2010 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement on effect of denominating the exercise price of a share-based payment award in the currency of the market in which the underlying equity securities trades and that currency is different from (1) entity's functional currency, (2) functional currency of the foreign operation for which the employee provides services, and (3) payroll currency of the employee. The pronouncement clarifies that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition, and therefore should be considered an equity award assuming all other criteria for equity classification are met. The pronouncement is for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010, and will be applied prospectively. Affected companies will be required to record a cumulative catch-up adjustment for all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the annual period in which the guidance is adopted. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard setting organizations and various regulatory agencies. Due to the tentative and preliminary nature of those proposed standards, management has not determined whether implementation of such proposed standards would be material to the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 4 - Advances- Related Party

In December 2008 all the issued shares of the Company were sold to a new shareholder, accordingly the control and management of the Company changed subsequent to this transaction. Prior to this transaction the Company received a $139 advance on August 17, 2006 and a $10,000 advance on August 28, 2006 from the former sole stockholder. On August 28, 2006, the amount owed by the Company for these advances was reduced by $100 when the former sole shareholder purchased 1,000,000 shares of common stock at .0001 per share. The Company received a further advance of $13,753 and $3,758 from the former sole shareholder during the year ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the current sole shareholder advanced $10,675 and $16,996, respectively to the Company. As of September 30, 2009, the former sole stockholder has given up her advance totaling $37,961 without restriction. The Company has recorded this as a capital contribution. As of December 31, 2010, the Company owes $0 to the former sole stockholder and $27,671 to the current sole stockholder.

NOTE 5 - Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.

NOTE 6 – Subsequent Events

In accordance with ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date as of December 31, 2010 through the date on which these financial statements were filed, and did not note significant subsequent events.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General

We were originally incorporated on August 17, 2006 under the laws of the State of Delaware. We were initially formed as a “blank check” entity for the purpose of seeking a merger, acquisition or other business combination transaction with a privately owned entity seeking to become a publicly-owned entity.

Our current principal business activity is to seek a suitable reverse acquisition candidate through acquisition, merger or other suitable business combination method.

It is the intent of management and our significant stockholder to provide sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. However, there is no legal obligation for either management or significant stockholder to provide additional future funding. Should this pledge fail to provide financing and we have not identified any alternative sources of funding. There will be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our need for capital may change dramatically because of any business acquisition or combination transaction. There can be no assurance that we will identify any such business, product, technology or company suitable for acquisition in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in consummating any acquisition on favorable terms or that we will be able to profitably manage the business, product, technology or company we acquire.

Plan of Operation

Our current purpose is to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, merge or acquire an interest in business opportunities presented to us by persons or companies who or which desire to seek the perceived advantages of a Securities Exchange Act of 1934 registered corporation. As of the date hereof, we have no particular acquisitions in mind and have not entered into any negotiations regarding such an acquisition, and neither our officer and director nor any promoter has engaged in any negotiations with any representatives of the owners of any business or company regarding the possibility of a merger or acquisition between us and such other company.

Pending negotiation and consummation of a combination, we anticipate that we will have, aside from carrying on our search for a combination partner, no business activities, and, thus, will have no source of revenue. Should we incur any significant liabilities prior to a combination with a private company, we may not be able to satisfy such liabilities as are incurred.

If our management pursues one or more combination opportunities beyond the preliminary negotiations stage and those negotiations are subsequently terminated, it is foreseeable that such efforts will exhaust our ability to continue to seek such combination opportunities before any successful combination can be consummated. In that event, our common stock will become worthless and holders of our common stock will receive a nominal distribution, if any, upon our liquidation and dissolution.

Management

We are in the development stage and currently have no full-time employees. Mr. Xiqun Yu is our sole officer, director and controlling shareholder. Mr. Yu has agreed to allocate a limited portion of his time to the activities of the Company without compensation. Potential conflicts may arise with respect to the limited time commitment by Mr. Yu and the potential demands of our activities.

The amount of time spent by Mr. Yu on the activities of the Company is not predictable. Such time may vary widely from an extensive amount when reviewing a target company to an essentially quiet time when activities of management focus elsewhere or some amount in between. It is impossible to predict with any precision the exact amount of time Mr. Yu will actually be required to spend to locate a suitable target company. Mr. Yu estimates that the business plan of the Company can be implemented by devoting less than five hours per month but such figure cannot be stated with precision.

Search for Business Opportunity

Our search will be directed toward small and medium-sized enterprises, which have a desire to become reporting corporations and which are able to provide audited financial statements. We do not propose to restrict our search for investment opportunities to any particular geographical area or industry, and may, therefore, engage in essentially any business, to the extent of our limited resources. Our discretion in the selection of business opportunities is unrestricted, subject to the availability of such opportunities, economic conditions, and other factors. No assurance can be given that we will be successful in finding or acquiring a desirable business opportunity, and no assurance can be given that any acquisition, which does occur, will be on terms that are favorable to us or our current stockholder.

We may merge with a company that has retained one or more consultants or outside advisors. In that situation, we expect that the business opportunity will compensate the consultant or outside advisor. As of the date of this filing, there have been no discussions, agreements or understandings with any party regarding the possibility of a merger or acquisition between the Company and such other company. Consequently, we are unable to predict how the amount of such compensation would be calculated at this time. It is anticipated that any finder that the target company retains would be a registered broker-dealer.

We will not restrict our search to any specific kind of firm, but may acquire a venture, which is in its preliminary or development stage, one which is already in operation or in a more mature stage of its corporate existence. The acquired business may need to seek additional capital, may desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer. We do not intend to obtain funds to finance the operation of any acquired business opportunity until such time as we have successfully consummated the merger or acquisition transaction. There are no loan arrangements or arrangements for any financing whatsoever relating to any business opportunities.

Evaluation of Business Opportunities

The analysis of business opportunities will be under the supervision of our sole officer and director, who is not a professional business analyst. In analyzing prospective business opportunities, management will consider such matters as available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operations, if any; prospects for the future; nature of present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development, or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable, but which then may be anticipated to impact the proposed activities of the Company; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or alternatively, acceptance of products, services, or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. In many instances, it is anticipated that the historical operations of a specific business opportunity may not necessarily be indicative of the potential for the future because of a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the possible need to expand substantially, shift marketing approaches, change product emphasis, change or substantially augment management, raise capital and the like. Management intends to meet personally with management and key personnel of the target business entity as part of its investigation. To the extent possible, we intend to utilize written reports and personal investigation to evaluate the above factors. Prior to making a decision to participate in a business opportunity, we will generally request that we be provided with written materials regarding the business opportunity containing as much relevant information as possible, including, but not limited to, such items as a description of products, services and company history; management resumes; financial information; available projections, with related assumptions upon which they are based; an explanation of proprietary products and services; evidence of existing patents, trademarks, alternatively, service marks, or rights thereto; present and proposed forms of compensation to management; a description of transactions between such company and its affiliates during the relevant periods; a description of present and required facilities; an analysis of risks and competitive conditions; a financial plan of operation and estimated capital requirements; audited financial statements, or if they are not available at that time, un-audited financial statements, together with reasonable assurance that audited financial statements would be able to be produced within a required period of time; and the like.

In the event we successfully complete the acquisition of or merger with an operating business entity, that business entity must provide audited financial statements for at least two most recent fiscal years or, in the event the business entity has been in business for less than two years, audited financial statements will be required from the period of inception. Acquisition candidates that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may not be considered appropriate for acquisition. We will not acquire or merge with any entity which cannot provide audited financial statements at or within a required period after closing of the proposed transaction. The audited financial statements of the acquired company must be furnished within 15 days following the effective date of a business combination.

When a non-reporting company becomes the successor of a reporting company by merger, consolidation, exchange of securities, and acquisition of assets or otherwise, the successor company is required to provide in a Current Report on Form 8-K the same kind of information that would appear in a Registration Statement or an Annual Report on Form 10-K, including audited and pro forma financial statements. The Commission treats these Form 8-K filings in the same way it treats the Registration Statements on Form 10 filings. The Commission subjects them to its standards of review selection, and the Commission may issue substantive comments on the sufficiency of the disclosures represented. If we enter into a business combination with a non-reporting company, such non-reporting company will not receive reporting status until the Commission has determined that it will not review the 8-K filing or all of the comments have been cleared by the Commission.

We believe that various types of potential merger or acquisition candidates might find a business combination with the Company to be attractive. These include acquisition candidates desiring to create a public market for their shares in order to enhance liquidity for current stockholders, acquisition candidates, which have long-term plans for raising capital through public sale of securities and believe that the possible prior existence of a public market for their securities would be beneficial, and acquisition candidates which plan to acquire additional assets through issuance of securities rather than for cash, and believe that the possibility of development of a public market for their securities will be of assistance in that process. Acquisition candidates, who have a need for an immediate cash infusion, are not likely to find a potential business combination with us to be an attractive alternative. Nevertheless, we have not conducted market research and are not aware of statistical data that would support the perceived benefits of a merger or acquisition transaction for the owners of a business opportunity. We are unable to predict when we may participate in a business opportunity. We expect, however, that the analysis of specific proposals and the selection of a business opportunity may take several months or more. There can also be no assurances that we are able to successfully pursue a business opportunity. In that event, there is a substantial risk to us that failure to complete a business combination will significantly restrict our business operation and force management to cease operations and liquidate the Company.

Acquisition of Business Opportunity

In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, and reorganization, joint venture or licensing agreement with another entity. We may also acquire stock or assets of an existing business. In connection with a merger or acquisition, it is highly likely that an amount of stock constituting control of the Company would either be issued by us or be purchased from our current principal stockholder by the acquiring entity or its affiliates, and accordingly, the shareholders of the target company, typically, become the majority of the shareholders of the combined company, the board of directors and officers of the target company become the new board and officers of the combined company and often the name of the target company becomes the name of the combined company.

There are currently no arrangements that would result in a change of control of the Company. It is anticipated that any securities issued as a result of consummation of a business combination will be issued in reliance upon one or more exemptions from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws to the extent that such exemptions are available. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of the transaction, we may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times thereafter. If such registration occurs, of which there can be no assurance; it will be undertaken by the surviving entity after the Company has entered into an agreement for a business combination or has consummated a business combination and we are no longer considered a dormant shell company. Until this occurs, we will not attempt to register any additional securities.

The issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market may have a depressive effect on the market value of our securities in the future if such a market develops, of which there is no assurance. There have been no plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale or issuance of additional securities. While the actual terms of a transaction to which we may be a party cannot be predicted, it may be expected that the parties to the business transaction will find it desirable to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a “tax-free” reorganization under Sections 351 or 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

In order to obtain tax-free treatment, it may be necessary for the owners of the surviving entity to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In this event, our current shareholder would retain less than 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity, which could result in significant dilution in the equity of such shareholder. However, treatment as a tax-free reorganization will not be a condition of any future business combination and if it is not the case, we will not obtain an opinion of counsel that the reorganization will be tax-free. With respect to any merger or acquisition, negotiations with target company management are expected to focus on the percentage of the Company which the target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for all of their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company’s assets and liabilities, our only shareholder will in all likelihood hold a substantially lesser percentage ownership interest in the Company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership may be subject to significant reduction in the event we acquire a target company with substantial assets.

Any merger or acquisition effected by us can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by our shareholder at such time. We will participate in a business opportunity only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such closing, outline the manner of bearing costs, including costs associated with our attorneys and accountants, and will include miscellaneous other terms. It is anticipated that we will not be able to diversify, but will essentially be limited to the acquisition of one business opportunity because of our limited financing. This lack of diversification will not permit us to offset potential losses from one business opportunity against profits from another, and should be considered an adverse factor affecting any decision to purchase our securities. There are no present plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings to offer the shares of the post-merger companies to third parties if any mergers occur, and there is no marketing plan to distribute the shares of the post-merger companies to third parties. Mr. Yu has not had any preliminarily contact, agreements or understandings with anyone to help sell these shares.

We intend to seek to carry out our business plan as discussed herein. In order to do so, we need to pay ongoing expenses, including particularly legal and accounting fees incurred in conjunction with preparation and filing of this registration statement, and in conjunction with future compliance with our on-going reporting obligations.

We do not intend to make any loans to any prospective merger or acquisition candidates or unaffiliated third parties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

It is the belief of management that sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity will be present. However, there is no legal obligation for either management or our significant stockholder to provide additional future funding. Should this pledge fail to provide financing, we have not identified any alternative sources. Consequently, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have no current plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale or issuance of additional securities prior to the location of a merger or acquisition candidate. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available to us to allow us to cover the expenses related to such activities.

Regardless of whether our cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet our operational needs, we might seek to compensate providers of services by issuances of stock in lieu of cash.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

There are numerous factors that affect the Company’s business and the results of its operations. These factors include general economic and business conditions; our ability to raise such funds as are necessary to maintain our operations; the ability of management to execute its business plan.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”). Disclosure Controls, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based upon their controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls are effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our first fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There is no material legal proceeding pending against us.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Copies of the following documents are included as exhibits to this report pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit No.		Title of Document

31		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

32		Certification pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

* The Exhibits attached to this Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to liability under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	TIA II, INC.

Date: June 21, 2011
	/s/ Xiqun Yu
	Xiqun Yu
	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Tia II, Inc 10-Q