UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________.

Commission File No. 001-10179

Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Delaware		87-0372864
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

~~22762 Westheimer~~1210 ~~Parkway~~West Clay Road, Suite ~~515~~5, ~~Katy~~Houston, Texas ~~77450~~77019 (Address of principal executive offices)

(~~832~~281) ~~437~~ 974 -~~0329~~ 1655 (Issuer’s telephone number)

(Issuer’s telephone number)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Copies of all communications to:

Marc Ross, Esq.

Andrew Smith, Esq.

Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP

61 Broadway, 32nd Floor

New York, New York 10006

Phone: (212) 930-9700

Fax: (212) 930-9725

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

¨ Large accelerated filer	¨ Accelerated filer
¨ Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	x Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

¨ Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of ~~February~~November 1110, 2011, the Company had 1731,~~659~~990,~~677~~797 shares outstanding.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION—FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page Number	~~Page Number~~
P ART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements	F-1	~~F-1~~
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010		F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and March 31, 2011	F-1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 – Unaudited		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 – Unaudited	F-3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 - Unaudited		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2011 - Unaudited	F-4
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation		1
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis and results of Operations	1
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures		8
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	6
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures	8
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings		8
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		9
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	9
Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities		9
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	9
Item 4 – Removed and Reserved		9
Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities	9
Item 5 - Other Information		9
Item 4 – Removed and Reserved	9
Item 6 – Exhibits		10
Item 5 - Other Information	9
SIGNATURES		13
Item 6 – Exhibits	10
SIGNATURES	14

PART I - FINANCIAL ~~INFORMATION~~INFORMMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

~~ITEM 1.~~ASSETS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

	June 30, 2011			March 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	3,907		$	483,578
Cash held in escrow		-			367,554
Accounts receivable		98,332			113,006
Notes receivable		-			37,500
Inventory		22,599			22,494
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		75,124			3,251
Total current assets		199,962			1,027,383


OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, accounted for using the full cost method, net
Unproven		1,212,267			1,212,267
Proven		6,088,355			5,657,975
		7,300,622			6,870,242

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost:
Field equipment		219,898			201,187
Computer equipment		19,549			19,759
Vehicles		69,540			79,202
		308,987			300,148
Less: accumulated depreciation		(61,263	)		(61,040	)
		247,724			239,108

OTHER ASSETS:
Deferred financing fees and other		79,133			109,858
		79,133			109,858

Total assets	$	7,827,441		$	8,246,591

~~GLEN ROSE~~See ~~PETROLEUM~~accompanying ~~CORPORATION~~notes ~~AND~~to ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~these consolidated financial statements

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			March 31,
	2010			2010
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	29,382		$	455,233
Cash held in escrow		-			2,750,000
Accounts receivable		165,197			-
Security deposits		1,000			-
Notes receivable		226,292			197,808
Inventory		55,433			54,947
Prepaid expenses		39,078			121,667
Total current assets		516,382			3,579,655
OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, accounted for using the full cost method
Unproven		1,116,150			1,050,000
Proven		4,503,109			4,096,039
		5,619,259			5,146,039
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost
Asset held under capital lease		26,571			-
Field equipment		897,310			123,666
Computer equipment		38,333			15,833
Vehicles		87,472			41,281
		1,049,686			180,780
Less accumulated depreciation		(92,491	)		(36,981	)
		957,195			143,799
OTHER ASSETS:
Equipment deposit		-			8,907
TOTAL ASSETS	$	7,092,836		$	8,878,400

See notes to the consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-1

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

~~CONSOLIDATED~~LIABILITIES ~~CONDENSED~~AND ~~BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)~~SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

	December 31,			March 31,
	June 30, 2011			March 31, 2011
	2010			2010
CURRENT LIABILITIES:	(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)
Accounts payable	$	1,062,081		$	685,905
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Notes payable, current portion		252,172			144,570
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized discount		1,576,525			1,190,092
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	955,944		$	752,133
Derivatives Liability - Convertible Note (Iroquois)		3,823,188			4,534,069
Accrued interest		271,566			53,675
Total current liabilities		6,713,966			6,554,636
Note payable – related party		30,714			28,935
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Notes payable – other		44,893			39,258
Asset retirement obligation		77,217			75,609
Current portion of obligation under capital lease		6,480			-
Warrant Liability - Convertible Note (Iroquois)		12,442,484			12,809,065
Total current liabilities		1,309,597			874,001
Warrant Liability - ABG		4,317,891			5,860,509
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Notes payable, less current portion		2,509,050			2,683,649
Asset retirement obligation		74,128			71,686
Warrant liability - Other		638,321			670,395
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized discount and loan fee		2,649,291			1,906,908
Total liabilities		26,698,929			28,653,863
Notes payable - other		2,489,780			2,489,780
SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:
Total liabilities		6,522,796			5,342,375
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		-			-
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.001 par value, 150,000,000 share authorized; 26,534,624 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 25,869,613, issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011		26,533			25,869
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		-			-
Additional paid-in capital		47,817,659			47,551,410
Common stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 17,631,441 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010, and 16,659,641 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010		17,631			16,660
Accumulated deficit		(66,715,680	)		(67,984,551	)
Common stock subscription receivable		(91,282	)		(88,912	)
Total shareholders’ deficit		(18,871,488	)		(20,407,272	)
Additional paid-in capital		55,129,949			54,550,837
Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$	7,827,441		$	8,246,591
Members' distributions*		(5,762	)		-
Accumulated deficit		(54,480,496	)		(50,942,560	)
Total shareholders’ equity		570,040			3,536,025
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	7,092,836		$	8,878,400

* VariableSee ~~interest~~accompanying ~~entity~~notes ~~activity, see Note 9~~ to ~~the~~these ~~accompanying~~consolidated financial statements.

See notes to the consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-2

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
				(restated)
OPERATING REVENUES:
Oil and gas sales	$	322,997		$	27,560

Total operating revenues		322,997			27,560

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Production and operating		234,194			169,991
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		64,481			14,031
General and administrative		863,252			1,602,928

Total operating costs and expenses		1,161,927			1,786,950


LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(838,930	)		(1,759,390	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Gain on cancellation of indebtedness		-			34,860
Loss on sale of property and equipment		(7,946	)		-
Interest income		33			9,858
Interest expense		(625,745	)		(340,346	)
Other		89,305			-
Change in value of warrant liability		32,074			1,805,040
Change in value of warrant liability - Iroquois		366,581			934,349
Change in value of derivative liability - Iroquois		710,881			1,165,997
Change in value of warrant liability - ABG		1,542,618			-

Total other income		2,107,801			3,609,759

NET INCOME	$	1,268,871		$	1,850,369

BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Net income	$	0.05		$	0.11
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		25,996,586			16,959,035

DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Net income	$	0.02		$	0.06
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		52,894,571			30,894,830

~~(Unaudited)~~See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
OPERATING REVENUES
Oil and gas sales	$	477,403		$	33,660		$	747,640		$	97,801
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES		477,403			33,660			747,640			97,801
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
Production and operating		334,193			16,083			570,791			81,000
Impairment of long-term asset		-			-			124,870			-
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		117,181			7,198			205,692			37,774
General and administrative		501,981			208,930			1,802,842			600,396
Stock compensation expense		124,038			169,580			580,085			260,814
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES		1,077,393			401,791			3,284,280			979,984
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(599,990	)		(368,131	)		(2,536,640	)		(882,183	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest income		10,778			8,287			31,117			23,472
Gain on cancellation of indebtedness		-			3,000			34,860			3,000
Loss on disposal of asset		-			-			-			(23,712	)
Other income		-			2,000			-			4,550
Interest expense		(366,766	)		(43,630	)		(1,067,274	)		(109,395	)
NET LOSS	$	(955,978	)	$	(398,474	)	$	(3,537,937	)	$	(984,268	)
Loss per share (basic and diluted)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.09	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic and diluted)		17,577,055			11,541,361			17,265,027			11,541,361

See notes to the consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-3

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:				(restated)
Net income	$	1,268,871		$	1,850,369
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		64,481			14,031
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		7,946			-
Net gain on settlement of debt		-			(34,860	)
Gain on litigation settlements		(89,305	)		-
Change in value of warrant liability		(32,074	)		(1,805,040	)
Change in value of warrant liability - Iroquois		(366,581	)		(934,349	)
Change in value of derivative liability - Iroquois		(710,881	)		(1,165,997	)
Change in value of warrant liability - ABG		(1,542,618	)		-
Stock compensation expense		164,400			875,507
Amortization of financing fees		30,725			33,275
Amortization of loan discount		425,117			137,616
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade and other receivables		(20,725	)		(14,463	)
Short term notes receivable		37,899			(9,011	)
Inventory		(105	)		(14,166	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(36,873	)		(48,122	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		376,176			225,522
Notes payable and accrued interest		84,959			206,208
Net cash used in operating activities		(338,587	)		(683,480	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to oil and gas properties		(483,024	)		(580,941	)
Additions to equipment		(25,614	)		(63,486	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(508,638	)		(644,427	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash held in escrow		367,554			1,100,000
Common stock receivable		-			762
Net cash provided by financing activities		367,554			1,100,762

NET DECREASE IN CASH		(479,671	)		(227,145	)

CASH, beginning of year		483,578			455,233

CASH, end of year	$	3,907		$	228,088

~~(Unaudited)~~- Continued -

	For the Nine Months Ended
	December 31,
	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(3,537,937	)	$	(984,268	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Loss on impairment of long-term asset		124,870			-
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		205,692			37,774
Net gain on settlement of debt		34,860			-
Stock compensation expense		580,085			260,814
Net loss on disposal of equipment		-			23,712
Gain on relief of indebtedness		-			(3,000	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade and other receivables		(167,568	)		16,422
Short term notes receivable		(28,483	)		(22,856	)
Inventory		(486	)		(24,178	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		137,233			22,627
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		-			(100,178	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		162,786			334,181
Interest added to note payable		398,159			26,887
Interest on amortization of discount and loan fees		569,529			59,850
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,521,260	)		(352,213	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to oil and gas properties		(745,830	)		(200,936	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		-			2,352
Additions to equipment		(834,888	)		(5,900	)
Loan repayments		-			19,937
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,580,718	)		(184,547	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings		-			500,380
Issuance of common stock		-			100,000
Reduction in capital lease obligation		(12,466	)		-
Payments on notes payable		(55,645	)		(12,000	)
Distribution to members *		(5,762	)		-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(73,873	)		588,380
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(3,175,851	)		51,620
CASH, beginning of year		3,205,233			18,867
CASH, end of year	$	29,382		$	70,487

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

* Variable interest entity activity, see note 9 to the accompanying financial statements.

See notes to the consolidated condensed financial statements.

F-4

	For the Nine Months Ended
	December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	94,916	$	-
Taxes	$	-	$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Beneficial conversion feature on note payable	$	-	$	-

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

	FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:	2011			2010

Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	329,473		$	0
Taxes	$	-		$	-

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Stock issued for conversion of debt	$	101,923		$	-
Warrant cancellations and terminations		-			292,331
Oil and Gas asset retirement obligation	$	(1,607	)	$	(1,481	)

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

F-5

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~NOTE~~ 1 –. ~~BASIS~~ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF ~~PRESENTATION~~SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation’s (the “Company,” “we” or “our”) interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. They contain all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair statement of the referenced interim period results. These interim period results do not indicate expected full-year results or results for future quarters/periods, due to several factors, including price volatility of crude oil and natural gas, price volatility of commodity derivatives, volatility of interest rates, estimates of reserves, drilling risks, geological risks, transportation restrictions, timing of acquisitions, product demand, market competition, interruption(s) in production, our ability to obtain additional capital, and the success of proposed enhanced oil recovery work (EOR). These consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation’s Form ~~10-K~~ ~~and Form~~ 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, ~~2010~~2011.

~~We prepared~~Use ~~the accompanying financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~ of America (“GAAP”) and included the accounts of Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and variable interest entities in which management considers the Company to be the primary beneficiary. We eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions. Management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results may differ from those estimates. We made significant assumptions in valuing the Company’s unproved oil reserves, which may affect the amounts at which oil properties are recorded. We have computed the Company’s stock-based compensation expense using assumptions such as volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest rate. Those assumptions may be revised in the near term, in which case these estimates will revised, and these revisions could be material.Estimates

~~We prepared~~Management ~~the~~has ~~Company’s~~made ~~financial~~certain ~~statements~~estimates onand aassumptions ~~going~~that ~~concern~~affect ~~basis~~reported ~~which contemplates~~amounts in the ~~realization~~financial ofstatements ~~assets~~ and ~~the~~disclosures ~~liquidation~~ of ~~liabilities in the ordinary course of business~~contingencies. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Actual ~~has~~results ~~incurred~~may ~~substantial~~differ ~~losses~~ from ~~operations~~those ~~and~~estimates. ~~has~~We amade ~~working~~significant ~~capital~~assumptions ~~deficit,~~in ~~which~~valuing ~~history and circumstance raise substantial doubt as to~~ the Company’s ~~ability~~unproved tooil ~~continue as a going concern. The Company had a net loss of $3~~reserves,~~537,937~~ ~~for~~which ~~the~~may ~~nine~~affect ~~months ended December 31, 2010 and a net loss of $2,509,790 for~~ the ~~fiscal~~amounts ~~year~~at ~~ended March~~which ~~31,~~oil ~~2010~~properties ~~and,~~are asrecorded. ofWe ~~the~~have ~~same~~computed ~~periods,~~ the Company’s ~~had~~stock-based ancompensation ~~accumulated deficit~~expense ofusing ~~$54,480,496,~~assumptions ~~and~~such ~~$50,942,560,~~as ~~respectively. During the quarter ended December 31~~volatility, ~~2010,~~expected ~~the~~life ~~Company did not raise any gross proceeds of additional equity financing. The Company is currently seeking additional capital to develop its properties~~ and ~~expand its operations. However;~~ the ~~Company~~ ~~can~~risk-free ~~provide~~interest norate. ~~assurance~~Those ~~that~~assumptions itmay ~~will~~ be ~~able~~revised toin ~~obtain~~ the ~~needed funds. Until~~near ~~such~~term, ~~funds~~in ~~are~~which ~~obtained~~case ~~and/or~~these ~~positive~~estimates ~~results~~will ~~from~~be ~~planned property development materialize~~revised, ~~doubt~~and ~~about~~these ~~its~~revisions ~~ability~~could tobe ~~continue as a going concern may remain~~material.

Currently we have one customer who buys 100% of our production.

Principles of Consolidation and Presentation

~~The consolidated~~We prepared the accompanying financial statements ~~include~~in ~~the~~accordance ~~accounts~~with ofaccounting ~~Glen~~principles ~~Rose~~generally ~~Petroleum Corporation~~accepted (in the ~~“Company”,~~United ~~“we”~~States orof America (“~~our~~GAAP”) and included the accounts of Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Glen Rose Petroleum Services, UHC Petroleum Corporation, UHC Petroleum Services Corporation and National Heritage Sales Corporation. In addition, Glen Rose Partners I LLC, a variable interest entity for which the Company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary, is also included in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~In February~~The ~~2010,~~name ~~UHC~~of ~~New~~the ~~Mexico~~Company was changed from United Heritage Corporation ~~(“New~~to ~~Mexico”),~~Glen aRose ~~wholly-owned non-operating~~Petroleum ~~subsidiary~~Corporation ofin ~~the~~May ~~Company~~2008. ~~was~~Concurrent ~~transferred~~with tothe ~~Blackwood~~name ~~Capital Limited~~change, athe ~~company~~Company ~~controlled~~entered byinto ~~our~~a ~~Chief~~statutory ~~Executive~~merger ~~Officer.~~whereby ~~The~~it ~~transfer~~moved ~~was~~its ~~a requirement~~state of incorporation from Utah to Delaware and United Heritage Corporation, the ~~Iroquois~~Utah ~~financing~~Corporation, ~~(See~~merged ~~Note~~into 6)the newly formed Delaware Corporation, Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation.

The name of the Company was changed from United Heritage Corporation to Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation in May, 2008.

F-6

Concurrent with the name change, the Company entered into a statutory merger whereby it moved its state of incorporation from Utah to Delaware and United Heritage Corporation, the Utah Corporation, merged into the newly formed Delaware Corporation, Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation.

All significant intercompany transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

Nature of Operations

Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation owns contiguous oil and gas properties located in Edwards County, Texas. The Company began production of the Texas properties during the year ended March 31, 2000. The Company sold a significant portion of its oil and gas properties in 2007. The Company continues to operate its remaining contiguous oil and gas properties including the Wardlaw and Adamson leases located in Edwards County, Texas and does not operate oil or gas properties in any other fields or areas.

Revenue Recognition

Oil and gas production revenues are recognized at the point of sale. Production not sold at the end of the fiscal year is included as inventory in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Inventory

Inventory consists of oil in tanks, which is valued at the lower of the cost to produce the oil or the current available sales price.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company uses the full cost method of accounting ~~under~~for ~~which~~its ~~all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of~~ oil and natural gas ~~reserves, including~~producing ~~costs~~activities. ~~related to unsuccessful wells and estimated future site restoration and abandonment~~Accordingly, ~~are~~all ~~capitalized until such time as the aggregate of such~~ costs ~~net~~associated ofwith ~~accumulated depletion and oil and natural gas related deferred income taxes~~acquisition, ~~on a country-by-country basis~~exploration, ~~equals~~and ~~the~~development ~~sum~~ of 1) the discounted present value (at 10%), using prices as of the end of each reporting period on a constant basis, of the Company’s estimated future net cash flows from estimated production of proved oil and natural gas reserves ~~as determined by independent petroleum consultants~~, ~~less~~including ~~estimated~~directly future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves but excluding future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations accrued on the balance sheet; plus 2) the cost of major development projects and unproven properties not subject to depletion, if any; plus 3) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in costs subject to depletion; less 4) related ~~income~~overhead ~~tax effects. If net capitalized~~ costs ~~exceed this limit~~, the excess is expensed unless subsequent market price changes eliminate or reduce the indicated write-down in accordance with U.S. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 12D. Depletion is computed using the units-of-production method whereby capitalized costs, net of estimated salvage values, plus estimated future costs to develop proved reserves and satisfy asset retirement obligations, are ~~amortized over the total estimated proved reserves on a country-by-country basis~~capitalized. ~~Investments in major development projects are not depleted until either proved reserves are associated with the projects or impairment has been determined.~~

~~During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company’s oil and gas properties did not have an impairment to recognize because it did not exceed its ceiling test limit.~~F-6

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Under full cost accounting rules, capitalized costs, less accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, shall not exceed an amount (the ceiling) equal to the sum of: (i) the after tax present value of estimated future net revenues computed by applying the 12-month un-weighted first-day-of-the-month average oil and gas prices to the Company's proved year-end reserve quantities, less future production, development, site restoration, and abandonment costs derived based on current costs assuming continuation of existing economic conditions and computed using a discount factor of ten percent; (ii) the cost of properties not being amortized; and (iii) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized. If unamortized costs capitalized within a cost center, less related deferred income taxes, exceed the ceiling, the excess shall be charged to expense and separately disclosed during the period in which the excess occurs. Amounts thus required to be written off are not reinstated for any subsequent increase in the cost center ceiling.

Depletion is provided using the unit-of-production method based upon estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves with oil and natural gas production being converted to a common unit of measure based upon their relative energy content. Investments in unproved properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs to be amortized. Once the assessment of unproved properties is complete and when major development projects are evaluated, the costs previously excluded from amortization are transferred to the full cost pool and amortization begins. The amortizable base includes estimated future development costs and where significant, dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, net of estimated salvage value.

In arriving at rates under the unit-of-production method, the quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves are established based on estimates made by the Company’s geologists and engineers which require significant judgment as does the projection of future production volumes and levels of future costs, including future development costs. In addition, considerable judgment is necessary in determining when unproved properties become impaired and in determining the existence of proved reserves once a well has been drilled. All of these judgments may have significant impact on the calculation of depletion expense.

Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved oil and natural gas reserves, in which case the gain or loss would be recognized in the statement of operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company’s oil and gas properties did not have an impairment to recognize because it did not exceed its ceiling test limit.

Earnings per Common Share

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“EPS”). ASC Topic 260-10 provides for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic EPS includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings or losses of the entity.

A reconciliation of shares used in calculating earnings per basic and diluted share follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2011		2010
Basic		25,996,586		16,959,035
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and warrants		12,794,517		15,330
Effect of assumed conversion of convertible debt		11,881,246		11,698,243
Effect of assumed conversion of working interest		2,222,222		2,222,222
Diluted		52,894,571		30,894,830

F-7

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED ~~CONDENSED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Property and Equipment~~(Unaudited)

~~Property~~ Weighted-average options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price ranging from $.97 to $.99 and ~~equipment~~options ~~are~~to ~~stated~~purchase 205,000 shares of common stock at ~~cost~~exercise prices ranging from $.39 to $1.35 per share that were outstanding during the three months ended June 30, ~~less~~2011 ~~accumulated~~and ~~depreciation~~June 30, 2010 were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. ~~Depreciation~~Weighted-average ~~is provided~~warrants ~~over~~to purchase 38,189,121 shares of common stock at an exercise price ranging from $.60 to $3.75 and warrants to purchase 27,477,854 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $.60 to $3.75 per share that were outstanding during the ~~estimated~~three ~~useful~~months ~~lives~~ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share. In each of these periods, such options’ and warrants exercise prices exceeded the ~~assets~~average ~~primarily~~market byprice of our common stock, thereby causing the ~~straight-line~~ ~~method~~effect asof ~~follows:~~such options and warrants to be anti-dilutive.

Equipment		3-14 years
Vehicles		3-5 years

Gains and losses resulting from sales and dispositions of property and equipment are included in current operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. During the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $55,510 and $18,203 respectively, which was charged to operations as incurred.

Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“EPS”). ACS Topic 260-10 provides for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic EPS includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings or losses of the entity. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, basic and diluted loss per share are the same since the calculation of diluted per share amounts would result in an anti-dilutive calculation that is not permitted and therefore not included. At December 31, 2010, the Company had potential common shares consisting of options and warrants exercisable into 28,226,420 shares, debt of $3,350,000 convertible into 11,666,667 shares, and an option granted to convert a 12.5% working interest in the Company’s Wardlaw lease into 2,222,222 shares. At December 31, 2009, the Company had potential common shares consisting of options and warrants exercisable into 25,634,752 shares.

Cash Flows Presentation

For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company primarily transacts its business with one financial institution. The account balances in that institution may from time-to-time exceed the federally insured limit of $250,000.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, substantially all of the Company’s revenue was generated from contracts with one customer.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates of oil and gas reserves, the asset retirement obligation and impairment on unproved properties are inherently imprecise and may change materially in the near term.

F-8

Financial Instruments

Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable. Recorded values of cash, receivables, payables and short-term debt approximate their respective fair values due to short maturities of these instruments. Recorded values of long-term notes payable approximate fair values, since their effective interest rates are commensurate with prevailing market rates for similar obligations.

Issuance of Stock for Non-Cash Consideration

All issuances of the Company's stock for non-cash consideration have been assigned a per share amount equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of the non-cash consideration received pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the market value of the shares on the dates issued.

The Company's accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of ASC Topic 505-10 Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services and ~~EITF~~ASC 00Topic 505-1850, ~~Accounting~~ ~~Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving~~ Equity-Based ~~Instruments Granted~~Payments to ~~Other Than~~ Non-Employees. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-10, an asset acquired in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset to equity on the grantor's balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the Company records the fair value of the fully vested non-forfeitable common stock issued for future consulting services as prepaid services in its consolidated balance sheet.

~~Long~~Stock-~~Lived Assets~~Based Compensation

~~Long~~The Company accounts for its stock-~~lived assets~~based compensation to beemployees ~~held~~in ~~and~~accordance ~~used~~with by the ~~Company~~provisions ~~are~~of ~~reviewed~~ASC ~~for~~Topic ~~impairment~~718, ~~whenever events~~Compensation—Stock orCompensation. ~~changes~~These inprovisions ~~circumstances~~require, ~~indicate~~among ~~that~~other things: (a) the ~~carrying~~fair ~~amount~~value of anall ~~asset may~~stock ~~not~~awards be ~~recoverable.~~expensed ~~The~~over ~~Company~~their ~~periodically~~respective ~~evaluates~~vesting periods; (b) the ~~recoverability~~amount of ~~its~~ ~~long-lived~~cumulative ~~assets~~compensation ~~based~~cost onrecognized ~~estimated~~at ~~future~~any ~~cash~~date ~~flows~~must ~~and~~at least be equal to the ~~estimated fair~~portion of the grant-date value of ~~such~~the ~~long-lived~~award ~~assets,~~that is vested at that date and ~~provides~~(c) ~~for~~that ~~impairment~~compensation ifexpense ~~such undiscounted~~include ~~cash~~a ~~flows~~forfeiture ~~are~~estimate ~~insufficient~~for those shares not expected to ~~recover~~vest. ~~the~~Also ~~carrying~~in ~~amount~~accordance ofwith ~~the long-lived~~these ~~assets.~~provisions, ~~For~~for ~~the~~those ~~nine~~awards ~~months~~with ~~ended~~multiple ~~December~~vest 31dates, ~~2010,~~the ~~under~~Company ~~the ceiling~~recognizes ~~test~~compensation ~~pertaining~~cost toon ~~its~~a ~~oil~~straight-line ~~properties,~~basis over the ~~Company~~requisite ~~did~~service ~~not~~period ~~have~~for ~~an impairment~~the entire award.

~~Income Taxes~~F-8

~~Provisions for~~GLEN ~~income~~ROSE ~~taxes~~PETROLEUM ~~are~~CORPORATION ~~based~~AND on taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled as prescribed in ASC Topic 740-10, Accounting for Income Taxes. As changes in tax laws or rate are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.SUBSIDIARIES

~~NOTE 2~~NOTES –TO ~~RECENT~~CONSOLIDATED ~~ACCOUNTING~~FINANCIAL ~~PRONOUNCEMENTS~~STATEMENTS

~~In January 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board~~ (~~FASB~~Unaudited) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-01 (ASU 2011-01) Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20 . ASU 2011-01 temporarily delay the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring will then be coordinated. Currently, the guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual period ending after June 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2011-01 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Common stock awards are also granted to various employees from time to time for merit purposes or in conjunction with hiring. Board members also receive common stock awards as part of their annual compensation. The fair value of common stock awards is defined as the closing trading price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.

All stock options and consultant warrants currently outstanding were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires extensive use of accounting judgment and financial estimates, including estimates of how long the holder will hold its vested stock options before exercise, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock over the expected term, and the number of options that will be forfeited prior to the completion of vesting requirements.

Warrant and Derivative Liabilities

The Company issued, in March 2010, convertible notes payable with warrants and, in a separate transaction in January 2011, issued Series D convertible preferred stock with warrants. In analyzing the March 2010 convertible notes and the January 2011 financing transaction, the conversion option for the notes payable and warrants associated with both transactions each have certain anti-dilution and other provisions that cause them to be a derivative and liability, respectively. The put option provision of the March 2010 convertible notes is at a 20% premium which causes it also to be a derivative. The derivative liabilities associated with the March 2010 convertible note are revalued each reporting period and any increase or decrease is recorded to the statement of operations under the caption “Change in value of derivative liability - Iroquois”. The warrant liabilities associated with the March 2010 convertible note are revalued each reporting period and any increase or decrease is recorded to the consolidated statement of operations under the caption “Change in value of warrant liability - Iroquois”. The warrant liabilities associated with the January 2011 financing transaction are revalued each reporting period and any increase or decrease is recorded to the statement of operations under the caption “Change in value of warrant liability - ABG”.

In order to properly evaluate the fair value of the derivatives and warrants, the Company engaged an independent valuation firm to perform a model valuation. Together with this independent valuation firm, the Company determined that the fair value of the derivatives is estimated by calculating the fair value of the convertible notes with and without the derivatives and that the difference is the estimated fair value of the derivatives. The independent valuation firm created a Monte Carlo simulation model which more adequately captures the dilution effects of the Company’s entire capital structure by modeling the derivatives and all the classes of warrants which might have a material dilutive effect. Within each trial of the simulation, the common stock price is based on the simulated enterprise value. For each class of warrants, if the stock price is above the current strike price on the exercise date, the warrant is assumed to be exercised. In order to determine the stock price for any given enterprise value the simulation is repeated multiple times until the stock price converges. This approach effectively captures the dilution effects of warrants and convertible note and its derivatives. The underlying value of the model is Enterprise Value, and each Claim is treated as a “claim” on the Enterprise Value. Since the common stock price is not the underlying value, the volatility implied by the model is not equal to the volatility used under a closed-form Black-Scholes model which values the warrants with the common stock as the underlying security. In the opinion of the independent valuation firm and management, modeling Enterprise Value is preferable due to the high level of risk in the Company’s debt and the lack of an exogenous source for the size and volatility of the Company’s credit spread. Moreover, the Enterprise Value model more effectively captures the default feature of notes and the down round feature of the warrants.

For more information regarding the warrant and derivative liability associated with the Convertible Notes Issued in March 2010, refer to Note 4.

For more information regarding the warrant liability associated with the Series D convertible preferred stock, refer to Note 5.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010 amounts to the June 30, 2011 presentation for comparative purposes.

F-9

~~In December~~GLEN ~~2010,~~ROSE ~~the~~PETROLEUM ~~Financial~~CORPORATION ~~Accounting~~AND Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 (ASU 2010-29) Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments in the Update also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments in the Update are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-29 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.SUBSIDIARIES

~~In December~~NOTES ~~2010,~~TO ~~the~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Financial~~FINANCIAL Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-28 (ASU 2010-28) Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issued Task Force). The amendments in the Update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more like than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-28 to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.STATEMENTS

~~NOTE 3 – INVENTORY~~(Unaudited)

Inventory consists of oil in tanks of $55,433 and $54,947 at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost to produce the oil or the current available sales price.Restatement

~~NOTE 4 –~~During ~~INCOME~~the ~~TAXES~~January 2011 offering of convertible preferred stock (“Regulation S Offering”) with warrants the Company realized that on May 22, 2008 when it entered into a statutory merger whereby it moved its state of incorporation from Utah to Delaware (See Note 5) the number of authorized shares was inadvertently changed from 125,000,000 to 20,000,000. In conjunction with the January 2011 Regulation S Offering, the Company applied to the State of Delaware to authorize 150,000,000 shares of common stock, which was completed on March 7, 2011. For the period from May 22, 2008 through March 7, 2011, the Company had warrants outstanding in excess of the authorized and unissued common shares and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, these warrants should have been classified as liabilities. In addition, as part of the process of closing the Company’s financial records for the year ended March 31, 2011, it noted the convertible debt and warrants issued in March 2010 and other transactions were not recorded correctly. The conversion option, which includes certain anti-dilution provisions, and a put option that includes a 20% premium, should have been bifurcated from the host contract and adjusted to fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 815. In addition the warrants also contain anti-dilution provisions that require liability classification in accordance with ASC Topic 815. As a result, the Company concluded that its annual financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010 as well as its quarterly financial statements for the quarters ended within the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, required a restatement to reflect these changes.

~~Included in~~A ~~Company’s~~summary ~~net deferred tax assets are approximately $4,977,000~~ of ~~potential future~~significant ~~tax~~effects ~~benefits from prior unused tax losses. Realization~~ of ~~these tax assets depends on sufficient future taxable income before~~ the ~~benefits~~restatement expire. It is not certain that the Company will have sufficient future taxable income to utilize the loss carry-forward benefits before they expire. Therefore, an allowance has been provided for the full amount of the net deferred tax asset. The Company’s recent change of majority ownership significantly reduced its ability to utilize its net operating losses.follows:

~~NOTE~~ On May 22, 2008, the Company had 20,307,087 warrants outstanding that carried a fair value of $11,926,934 as of that date and a fair value of $1,784,348 as of March 31, 2009. As of May 22, 2008, the Company made an adjustment to reclassify the warrants from equity to a liability and at March 31, 2009 the fair value was adjusted. For the year ended March 31, 2010, 3,733,332 warrants at a fair value of $536,746 at grant date were issued and 9,000,000 warrants at a fair value of $1,391,493 at termination date were cancelled. At March 31, 2010 the fair value of the warrants outstanding, not including the warrants issued with the convertible notes, was $3,992,172. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, 4,183,336 warrants at a fair value of $747,926 at grant date were issued. On March 7, 2011, the fair value of the warrants outstanding, not including the warrants issued with convertible notes or with the January 2011 Regulation S Offering or 1,335,000 warrants due to certain consultants (see note 5) –was ~~STOCK~~$4,525,117 ~~OPTIONS~~and was reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

The ~~following~~ ~~table~~convertible ~~summarizes~~notes ~~pertinent~~issued ~~information~~on ~~with~~March ~~regard~~3, to2010 ~~our~~included ~~stock~~anti-dilution provisions in the conversion option ~~Plans~~ and the warrants that allow for a reset of the ~~nine~~respective ~~months~~conversion and exercise prices in certain situations when the Company issues common shares at a lower price. Additionally, the convertible notes include a provision that allows the creditors to put the notes back to the Company at a 20% premium in certain change of control or default situations. In order to determine the fair value of the embedded derivatives and the warrant liability the Company utilized a Monte Carlo simulation methodology. As of March 3, 2010, the fair value of the derivatives was $1,593,002 and the fair value of the warrant liability was $4,258,094. Due to the number of common shares on a fully-diluted basis offered to the creditors, the fair value of the derivatives and the warrant liability exceeded the principal amount of the convertible notes and so the Company recorded interest expense of $2,501,096 upon the date of issuance. The original issue discount of $3,350,000 is being amortized over the life of the debt using the effective interest rate method and for the year ended ~~December~~March 31, 2010: the amortization was $38,548. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the amortization of the debt discount was $137,616.

	Option and		Weighted Average Exercise
	Rights		Price
Outstanding at beginning of year, April 1, 2010		1,020,000	$	1.63
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		1,020,000		1.63
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		1,020,000	$	1.63

Stock based compensation expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of $326,557 was reclassed from a separate category for stock based compensation in the statement of operations to general and administrative expense in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation. Additionally $548,950 of stock based compensation related to warrants issued to consultants was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

The weighted average contractual life of options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010 was 1.15 years. The weighted average grant date fair value for options granted was $0.95 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not grant any options.

F-10

~~NOTE 6~~GLEN –ROSE ~~NOTES~~PETROLEUM ~~PAYABLE~~CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Blackwood Ventures~~NOTES ~~LLC~~TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company accrued interest in the amount of $607 and $7,036 respectively, which was charged to operations. As of December 31, 2010, the note balance, including accrued interest was $30,714. Blackwood Ventures LLC was a related party at the inception of the note. This note is currently subject to a lawsuit with a former officer of the Company.(Unaudited)

~~Buccaneer Energy~~Independent ~~Corporation~~petroleum engineers have estimated the Company’s proved oil and gas reserves, all of which are located in Edwards County, Texas. Proved reserves are the estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, such estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The reserves actually recovered and the timing of production of these reserves may be substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily from new information obtained from development drilling and production history and from changes in economic factors. The original reserve report for fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 was not prepared in compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and accounting standards, which require that calculations be based on the twelve month un-weighted first-day-of –the-month average price for March 31, 2010. As such, the Company corrected the report and restated the related disclosures in the supplementary financial information in the Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011. The effect of these adjustments was not material to the recorded depreciation, depletion and accretion amounts reported for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company accrued interest in the amount of $1,977 and $1,619, which was charged to operations. The balance of this note at December 31, 2010 was $44,893. Buccaneer Energy Corporation was a related party at the inception of the note. This note is currently subject to a lawsuit with a former officer of the Company.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (As Previously Reported)			Amount of Change			Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (As Restated)
Statement of Operations
Production and Operating	$	140,845		$	29,146		$	169,991
Impairment of field equipment		66,739			(66,739	)		-
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		17,598			(3,567	)		14,031
General and administrative		727,421			875,507			1,602,928
Stock based compensation		326,557			(326,557	)		-
Interest Expense		(358,807	)		18,461			(340,346	)
Change in value of warrant liability		-			1,805,040			1,805,040
Change in value of warrant liability - Iroquois		-			934,349			934,349
Change in value of derivative liability - Iroquois		-			1,165,997			1,165,997
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,565,690	)	$	3,416,058		$	1,850,369
Basic Earnings per common share	$	(0.12	)	$	0.23		$	0.11
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	(0.12	)	$	0.18		$	0.06

~~Installment Obligation~~2. GOING CONCERN

The Company’s isfinancial ~~financing~~statements ~~premiums~~have onbeen ~~certain~~prepared ~~insurance~~on ~~policies.~~a ~~The~~going ~~obligation~~concern ~~is paid~~basis inwhich ~~three~~contemplates ~~quarterly~~the ~~installments~~realization of ~~$19,196~~assets ~~including~~and ~~interest~~the ~~assessed~~liquidation ~~at an~~of ~~annual~~liabilities ~~rate~~in the ordinary course of 6business.~~91%.~~ The ~~first~~Company ~~installment~~has ~~was~~incurred ~~due~~substantial losses from operations and ~~paid~~it inhas ~~June~~negative ~~2010. The~~operating ~~balance~~cash offlows ~~this~~which ~~obligation~~raises ~~was~~substantial ~~fully~~doubt ~~paid~~about atits ~~December~~ability ~~31,~~to ~~2010~~continue as a going concern. ~~Interest charged~~The toCompany ~~operations~~had onnet ~~this~~income ~~obligation~~of ~~during~~$1,268,871 for the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~ ~~totaled~~2011 and has an accumulated deficit of $~~486~~66,715,679, at June 30, 2011.

~~Lothian Put~~The ~~Option~~Company ~~Holders~~intends to continue its planned capital expenditure to continue its reworking and drilling programs, but does not have sufficient realized revenues and cash on hand is not adequate to cover immediate cash needs. However, the Company expects revenues from production will be enough to cover operating expenses in the near term.

~~In February~~Although ~~2010,~~ the Company ~~entered~~obtained ~~into~~additional ~~novation~~financing ~~agreements~~of ~~with~~approximately ~~the~~$1.9 ~~option holders~~million toin ~~convert~~July 2011 (see Note 9), which provided the ~~put~~needed ~~option~~funds ~~liabilities~~for ~~into~~continued ~~unsecured~~operations ~~notes~~and ~~payable totaling~~drilling $2program in the short term,~~489,780.~~ ~~These~~the ~~notes~~Company ~~are~~can ~~assessed~~provide ~~interest~~no atassurance anthat ~~annual~~it ~~rate~~will ofbe 4% able to obtain sufficient additional financing that it needs to develop its properties and ~~mature~~alleviate ondoubt ~~September~~about ~~30,~~its ~~2011,~~ability ~~when~~to continue as a going concern. If the ~~principal~~Company ~~balances~~is ~~and~~able ~~accrued interest~~to ~~thereon~~obtain ~~are~~sufficient ~~due;~~additional ~~however~~financing proceeds, the Company ~~has~~cannot ~~the~~be ~~right~~certain tothat ~~extend~~this ~~the maturity~~additional ~~dates~~financing towill ~~September~~be 30available on acceptable terms, ~~2012~~if ~~with~~at anall. ~~increase~~To inthe extent the ~~interest~~Company ~~rate charged~~raises onadditional funds by issuing equity securities, the ~~notes~~Company’s tostockholders 6%may ~~per~~experience ~~annum~~significant dilution. ~~Interest~~ ~~accrued~~Any ondebt ~~these~~financing, ~~notes and~~if ~~charged~~available, tomay ~~operations~~involve ~~for~~restrictive ~~the~~covenants ~~quarter~~that ~~ended~~impact ~~December~~the ~~31,~~Company’s ~~2010~~ability ~~amounted~~ to ~~$38,177~~ conduct business. ~~The~~Furthermore, ~~balance~~certain of ~~this~~the ~~obligation~~Company’s atcurrent ~~December~~creditors ~~31,~~may ~~2010,~~be ~~including~~required ~~accrued interest~~to ofapprove ~~$136,523,~~any ~~totaled~~such ~~$2,626,303~~transaction.

Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund, LP

Convertible Debt

On March 3, 2010, the Company issued secured convertible notes and warrants to Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund and 12 other investors in exchange for $3,350,000. The notes mature in two years and accrue interest at an annual rate of 8%. The Company, at its election during the first 180 days and, with the Note holder’s permission, thereafter, can elect to defer the required quarterly interest payments by calculating accrued interest for the quarter using the rate of 12% per annum and agreeing to add the accrued interest amount to the principal amount of the notes. The outstanding principal and interest on the notes is convertible into Company common stock at the option of each note holder at $0.30 per share with the Company having the right to force conversion once the Company achieves a greater than $1.25 share price and minimum daily volume of $2,000,000. The maximum number of conversion common stock shares for the notes’ principal amounts, assuming all shares are converted, is 11,666,667 common stock shares. The notes are secured by all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ assets. The investors are also receiving a total of 11,666,667 warrants exercisable at $0.60 per share with five year terms. The warrants have cashless exercise provisions. Should the Company issue common stock to third parties for consideration less than the note conversion price or the warrant exercise price during the term of the notes or warrants, the note conversion price and the warrant exercise price shall be adjusted downward to equal the price at which the Company issued that common stock. The Company incurred loans fees of $250,311 which is being amortized over the life of the loan and is being netted against the balance of the notes.

F-11

~~The subscription~~GLEN ~~agreement~~ROSE ~~also~~PETROLEUM ~~calls~~CORPORATION ~~for~~AND the Company to have a director nominated by Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund LP or its assignee. Accordingly, the Company has amended its bylaws to provide for such a “Nominated Director.” Further, under the amended bylaws, the Nominated Director must approve certain business decisions without regard to the vote of the other Directors, including (i) the Company’s or Subsidiary’s annual budget; (ii) acquisition or disposition of material assets, outside the ordinary course of business; (iii) formation or dissolution of the Company or Subsidiary; (iv) expenditure of or incurring of an obligation of $20,000 or more for a single purpose during any consecutive twelve month period unless such expenditure has been approved in a budget approved by the board of directors of the Company or Subsidiary (“single purpose” may include an approved general plan of operations relating to oil and gas production and shall not be a reference to the engagement of any single vendor in connection with such approved general plan of operations relating to oil and gas production), provided such expenditure has been approved in a budget approved by the board of directors of the Company and Subsidiary, as applicable; (v) open or close any account with any financial institution; (vi) initiation or settlement of any litigation, arbitration or judicial proceeding; and (vii) the issuance of any equity of the Company or right to receive or acquire any equity of the Company, or modification of any of the foregoing outstanding at any time. The Nominated Director bylaw provision ceases to be effective when the notes are paid.SUBSIDIARIES

~~In accordance~~NOTES ~~with~~TO ~~terms~~CONSOLIDATED ofFINANCIAL the loan, the $3,350,000 was placed in escrow. Pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement, funds held in escrow are released at the Company’s written request promptly after the Escrow Agent receives a certified resolution of the Company’s board of directors which must include the affirmative approval of the Nominated Director. As of December 31, 2010, no funds remained in escrow.STATEMENTS

Pursuant to ASC Topic 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options,” the convertible notes were recorded net of discounts that include the relative fair value of the warrants amounting to $1,999,257. The discounts are amortized and charged to operations over the two year life of the debt using the effective interest method. The initial value of the warrants of $1,999,257 was calculated using the Black Scholes Option Model with a risk free interest rate of 2.27%, volatility of 121.39%, and trading price of $0.24 per share.(Unaudited)

~~Pursuant to~~The ~~the~~consolidated ~~terms~~financial ofstatements ~~the~~do ~~promissory~~not ~~notes,~~include ~~for~~any ~~the~~adjustments first 180 days after delivery of the promissory notes, the Company is to either pay accrued interest by the end of each calendar quarter or deliver each note holder an Allonge which increases the principal amount of the holder’s note by adding the accrued interest. The promissory notes also provide that ifmight ~~the~~result ~~Company~~from ~~pays by cash~~ the ~~interest~~outcome ~~rate for calculating interest due is at the rate~~ of 8%this ~~per annum and if the Company elects to deliver an Allonge to each of the note holders a 12% interest rate shall be applied to the interest accrued~~uncertainty. ~~A default interest rate of 15% will be applicable during any event of default and until the default is cured.~~

~~From July 1, 2010 to August 20, 2010 the Company was in default for having failed to send the Allonges to the note holders~~3. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~NOTES accrued interest in the amount of $74,576 for this period at the 15% default rate. The Company cured the default on August 20, 2010. An election was made by the Company to pay 9 of the 13 note holders the 8% interest in the amount of $94,916 from the cure date to the end of the quarter. The interest was paid on October 4, 2010 as agreed by the Company and the note holders. The remaining 4 note holders and the Company elected to execute an Allonge and to have their interest accrued at the rate of 12% from the cure date to the end of the quarter. This interest totaled $5,238. Interest charged to operations on the cumulative principal of the notes for quarter ended September 30, 2010 totaled $108,297. The balance of the notes at September 30, 2010, net of discounts and loan fees totaling $1,063,329, was $2,446,143.PAYABLE

Subsequent to the end of the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company and the holder of a majority-in-interest of the Company’s convertible promissory notes sold to Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund and other investors negotiated an adjustment to the interest rate under the promissory notes for the quarter. It was agreed that interest would accrue at 15% for the entire quarter and that the portion of the interest accrued at 8% would be paid in cash on January 24, 2011, and that the remaining accrued interest could be paid at the Company’s election in cash or by delivery on January 24, 2011, of allonges to the promissory notes increasing the principal balances thereof. The cash interest payment and allonges were delivered on January 24, 2011.

	June 30, 2011		March 31, 2011
Blackwood Ventures LLC	$	31,945	$	31,320
Litigation settlement with Joseph “Chip” Langston		120,000		120,000
PE Consulting		-		13,250
Lothian Put Option holders		2,499,050		2,663,649
Litigation settlement with Thomas Pernice		110,227		-
		2,761,222		2,828,219
Less current portion		252,172		144,570
Notes payable, less current portion	$	2,509,050	$	2,683,649

~~Interest charged~~Blackwood toVentures operations on the cumulative principal of the notes for quarter ended December 31, 2010 totaled $135,043. The balance of the notes at December 31, 2010, net of discounts and loan fees totaling $873,563, was $2,649,291.LLC

~~NOTE 7~~Through -March ~~NOTE~~31, ~~RECEIVABLE~~2010, Blackwood Ventures LLC made advances to the Company totaling $426,000, which were assessed interest at an annual rate of 8%. Accrued interest is payable quarterly. Of the amount advanced, $250,000 and related accrued interest were subject to a Convertible Debenture Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Debenture, in lieu of receiving cash, Blackwood had the right to receive shares of the Company’s common stock as payment for accrued interest at a conversion price of 5% over the bid price on the date of payment. The advances are convertible into common stock of the Company at price per share of $ 0.19. The debenture matured on September 30, 2010.

~~Bowie Operating~~For the year ended March 31, 2010, the Company ~~LLC~~issued 2,600,410 shares of its common stock to Blackwood in exchange for the cancellation of $489,078 of loans, advances, accrued compensation, and accrued interest.

~~The~~As ~~loan due from Bowie Operating Company, LLC is assessed interest at rate~~ of ~~18%~~June ~~per annum. The loan is evidenced by a secured promissory note~~30, ~~which~~2011 isprincipal ~~currently in default,~~ and ~~was~~accrued ~~due~~interest onis ~~demand after September 1~~$31, ~~2009~~945. Interest ~~accruing~~charged to operations on the ~~note~~ ~~and~~debenture ~~credited to operations~~ during the ~~quarter~~quarters ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~ ~~was~~2010 ~~$8,334~~amounted ~~and~~to $~~6,404,~~625 ~~respectively. The balance of the principal~~ and ~~interest~~ ~~on the note as of December 31, 2010 was~~ $~~189~~577,~~274.~~ ~~Bowie Operating Company LLC was a related party at the inception of this note~~respectively. This note is currently subject to a lawsuit with a former officer of the Company. The Company continues to record interest on the note as well as the notes principal on its financials until the lawsuit dispute is resolved.

Lothian Oil Note Payable

In February 2006, certain option agreements with shareholders of Lothian Oil, Inc. were modified and granted the shareholders a put option to require the Company to purchase said options for a price of $4.00 per share less the purchase price of $1.50 per share by making demand between April 1, 2008 and April 10, 2008 (“Put Option”). The Put Holders exercised their rights in the required period, but the Company had insufficient funds to meet the demand and these obligations totaling $2,147,770 were recognized as a liability by the Company.

In February 2010, the Company entered into novation agreements with the option holders to convert the put option liabilities into unsecured notes payable totaling $2,489,780. These notes are assessed interest at an annual rate of 4% and mature on September 30, 2011, when the principal balances and accrued interest thereon are due; however, the Company has the right to extend the maturity dates to September 30, 2012 with an increase in the interest rate charged on the notes to 6% per annum. The Company recognized a loss of $342,010 on the conversion, which was charged to operations in March 2010. As of March 31, 2011, the principal balance of the note was reduced by $186,508, and accrued interest of $13,024 was written off, due to the June 13, 2011 litigation settlement with Thomas Pernice (see below).

F-12

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Interest accrued on these notes and charged to operations for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $34,933 and $37,762 respectively. The balance of this obligation, including accrued interest, is $2,499,050 on June 30, 2011. The entire amount is classified as long-term because the Company exercised its right to extend the maturity to September 30, 2012.

Litigation Settlement with Joseph “Chip” Langston

On August 2, 2011 a litigation settlement was reached with Joseph “Chip” Langston, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer. The settlement covered the Langston Family Partnership and Buccaneer Energy Corporation v. Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation and the Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation v. Joseph Langston matters.

In the settlement agreement, Mr. Langston agreed to discontinue and withdraw all legal claims with prejudice in exchange for receiving $80,000 in a lump sum payment and $3,333 each month for twelve (12) months thereafter and returning all shares of the Company’s common stock in which he or anyone related to him had beneficial control or ownership. The initial payment of $80,000 was made when the settlement was signed on August 2, 2011. The monthly payments commenced on October 1, 2011. As of June 30, 2011, $110,000 of these payments was recorded as a current payable, while the remaining $10,000 in monthly payments was recorded as a non-current payable.

Litigation Settlement with Thomas Pernice

On June 13, 2011 a litigation settlement was reached with Thomas Pernice, a Lothian Oil Put Option holder, for the lump sum payment $110,227 to Mr. Pernice. The principal balance and accrued interest related to Mr. Pernice’s portion of the Lothian Oil Put Option, totaling $199,532, was written off as of March 31, 2011. A gain of $89,305, which is the difference between the principal balance and accrued interest written off and the lump sum payment, was recorded as a gain on the litigation settlement for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The lump sum payment of $110,227 was made to Mr. Pernice on July 27, 2011.

Buccaneer Energy Corporation

~~The~~In ~~loan due~~prior ~~from~~periods, ~~Buccaneer~~the ~~Energy~~Company ~~Corporation~~had ~~is assessed interest at rate of 18% per annum. The loan is evidenced by~~ a ~~secured promissory~~ note, ~~which~~payable isrecorded ~~currently~~from ~~in default,~~Buccaneer ~~and~~Energy ~~was~~Corporation ~~due~~which ~~on demand after December 31, 2009. Interest accruing on the note and credited to operations~~ during the ~~quarter~~year ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2010~~2009 ~~was $1,630.~~advanced ~~The balance of the principal and interest on the note as of December 31, 2010 was~~ $3732,~~017. Buccaneer~~500 ~~Energy~~to ~~Corporation~~UHC ~~was~~Petroleum ~~a related party at the inception of this note~~Corporation. This note iswas ~~currently~~ subject to a lawsuit with a former officer of the Company. The ~~Company~~lawsuit ~~continues~~was tosettled ~~record interest~~ on August 2, 2011 and the balance of the note asplus ~~well~~accrued asinterest ~~the~~was ~~notes~~written ~~principal~~off onand ~~its~~credited ~~financials~~to ~~until~~operations ~~the lawsuit~~as ~~dispute~~of isMarch ~~resolved~~31, 2011.

~~NOTE 8– STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~Other

~~In January~~A ~~2008,~~short-term ~~the~~loan ~~Company~~of ~~reincorporated~~$65,000 ~~and changed its domicile from Utah~~ to ~~Delaware~~ ~~pursuant to~~ a ~~Reincorporation~~related ~~and~~party ~~Merger~~is ~~Agreement.~~recorded ~~Prior~~within to the ~~reincorporation,~~ ~~the~~accounts ~~Company~~payable ~~had~~as ~~120 million common shares authorized. In the reincorporation, the Company believed it maintained the same number~~ of ~~authorized~~ ~~shares.~~June ~~However~~30, ~~by reason of an administrative error on the part of the Company, this was not the case, and only 20 million common shares were authorized for issuance~~2011. The ~~Company~~loan ~~discovered~~was ~~this~~repaid ~~technical defect~~ in ~~December~~ ~~2010~~full ~~and~~at ~~immediately acted to cure~~ the ~~defect~~beginning ~~by obtaining majority shareholder approval to increase the number~~ of ~~authorized~~July ~~shares to 150 million (See Note 11 – Subsequent Events)~~2011.

~~During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not issue shares of common stock to directors as compensation for their services rendered~~4. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~CONVERTIBLE previously issued 240,000 shares of common stock to certain directors as prepaid compensation, at quarter ended September 30, 2010. The services were rendered during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 and, accordingly, the $84,000 (representing the value of the shares) was charged to operations and is included in stock compensation expense.DEBT

~~During the~~On ~~quarter~~March ~~ended December 31~~3, 2010, the Company issued 53secured convertible notes and warrants to Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund LP (“Iroquois”) and 12 other investors in exchange for $3,~~500~~350,000. ~~shares~~The notes mature in two years and accrue interest at an annual rate of 8%. The Company, with the Note holders’ permission, can elect to defer the required quarterly interest payments by increasing the interest rate charged to 12% per annum. The outstanding principal and interest on the notes is convertible into common stock of the Company at the option of each note holder at $0.30 per share with the Company having the right to ~~its~~force ~~Chief~~conversion ~~Financial~~once ~~Officer~~the asCompany ~~incentive~~achieves ~~compensation~~a greater than $1.25 share price and minimum daily volume of $2,000,000. Upon the occurrence of a default that continues for ~~services rendered~~more ~~under~~than ~~his~~30 ~~contract~~business days, a change of control or certain other events, the Note holders can demand redemption of the outstanding notes at a price of 120% of the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. The original maximum number of conversion common stock shares ~~were~~for ~~valued~~the atnotes’ ~~$11~~principal amounts,~~235~~ ~~which~~assuming all shares are converted was ~~charged to~~11,166,667 ~~operations~~shares of common stock.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock to its Chief Financial Officer as compensation for his services. The options were valued at $15,303 which was charged to operations. The exercise prices of these options were range from $0.75 per share to $1.50 per share.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 37,500 shares of common stock to James Casperson, a consultant as compensation for services to be rendered under his consulting engagement agreement.. The shares were valued at $13,500 which was charged to operations.

NOTE 9- VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY

In February 2010, the Company sold a 12.5% working interest in the production of newly drilled wells located in Wardlaw Field to Glen Rose Partners I, LLC, (“Partners”) for $1,000,000. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company is required to pay all of Partners’ drilling and production costs until Partners’ carried costs equal $2,000,000. Further, for five years, Partners will also have conversion rights to convert its working interest in the Wardlaw Prospect with an imputed value equal to the working interest purchase price as adjusted, into the Company’s common stock in the same manner as the secured convertible notes are convertible, except that Partners conversion price shall be 150% of the secured convertible notes’ conversion price in effect as of the conversion date, provided that the secured convertible notes remain outstanding on the date of such conversion. Partners is an affiliate of Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund, LP

The Company complies with the accounting guidance related to consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Under this guidance, a reporting entity is required to determine the primary beneficiary who would consolidate the VIE in its financial statements. The determination uses a qualitative approach based upon which variable interest holder has the power to direct economic performance related activities of the VIE, as well as the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance requires the primary beneficiary assessment to be performed on an ongoing basis. The Company has evaluated its relationship with Partners and has determined it is the primary beneficiary because until Partners receives $2,000,000 in revenue 1) the Company has all decision making control on the respective wells and 2) the Company is required to incur all of the financial risks pertaining to the respective wells’ drilling and production costs.

Partners’ operating activity included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations is as follows:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	December 31,					December 31,
	2010			2009		2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Oil and gas sales	$	808		$	-	$	6,816		$	-
Operating costs and expenses Production taxes		(33	)		-		(279	)		-
Net income from operations	$	775		$	-	$	6,537		$	-

F-13

~~NOTE 10~~GLEN –ROSE ~~COMMITMENT~~PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND ~~CONTINGENCIES~~SUBSIDIARIES

~~Commitment~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company entered into a consulting agreement in February 2010, for a period of thirty six months. Under the agreement, $25,000 is to be paid monthly to the consultant, If the hours expended by the consultant in any month exceed 100 hours, the consultant shall have the right to limit each future month’s commitment to 100 hours in the absence of an agreement for compensation for such excess work.(Unaudited)

~~Minimum future~~During ~~consulting~~the ~~payments~~fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, one of the Note holders converted $45,000 of the Note balance into stock, resulting in the conversion of principal equivalent to 150,000 shares of common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, two Note holders converted their principal balance and accrued interest into common stock. The first Note holder converted $38,209 into 127,362 shares of common stock while the second Note holder converted $63,157 into 210,524 shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2011, the remaining maximum number of conversion shares of common stock for the notes’ principal amounts plus accrued and unpaid interest, assuming all remaining shares are asconverted, ~~follows:~~was 11,881,246 shares of common stock. Subsequent to June 30, 2011, an additional $88,700 was converted into 295,666 shares. The Company incurred loans fees of $250,311, which has been deferred and is being amortized over the life of the notes.

December 31,
2011	$	300,000
2012		300,000
2013		25,000
Total minimum consulting payments	$	625,000

The notes are secured by all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ assets. The investors also received a total of 11,166,667 warrants exercisable at $0.60 per share with five year terms. The warrants have cashless exercise provisions. These warrants and conversion option contain certain reset provisions including (i) should the Company issue common stock to third parties for consideration less than the note conversion price or the warrant exercise price during the term of the notes or warrants, the note conversion price and the warrant exercise price shall be adjusted downward to equal the price at which the Company issued that common stock (referred to as the “down-round” feature), and (ii) should certain events occur, the number of warrants at the new exercise price shall be increased. On January 24, 2011, the Company issued Series D convertible preferred stock to third-party investors in a Regulation S Offering (see Note 5) at a conversion price of $0.30 per share. Due to the provisions of that stock offering and the warrant reset provisions, the Company adjusted the exercise price of the warrants to $0.30 per share and increased the number of warrants to 22,333,334.

~~Contingencies~~The subscription agreement also calls for the Company to have a director nominated by Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund LP or its assignee. Accordingly, the Company has amended its bylaws to provide for such a “Nominated Director.” Further, under the amended bylaws, the Nominated Director must approve certain business decisions without regard to the vote of the other Directors, including (i) the Company’s or Subsidiary’s annual budget; (ii) acquisition or disposition of material assets, outside the ordinary course of business; (iii) formation or dissolution of the Company or Subsidiary; (iv) expenditure of or incurring of an obligation of $20,000 or more for a single purpose during any consecutive twelve month period unless such expenditure has been approved in a budgetapproved by the board of directors of the Company or Subsidiary (“single purpose” may include an approved general plan of operations relating to oil and gas production and shall not be a reference to the engagement of any single vendor in connection with such approved general plan of operations relating to oil and gas production), provided such expenditure has been approved in a budget approved by the board of directors of the Company and Subsidiary, as applicable; (v) open or close any account with any financial institution; (vi) initiation or settlement of any litigation, arbitration or judicial proceeding; and (vii) the issuance of any equity of the Company or right to receive or acquire any equity of the Company, or modification of any of the foregoing outstanding at any time. The Nominated Director bylaw provision ceases to be effective when the notes are paid.

~~The Company~~In isaccordance ~~involved~~with interms ~~various~~of ~~claims~~the ~~incidental~~loan, to the ~~conduct~~$3,350,000 ofwas ~~our~~placed ~~business~~in escrow. ~~Based~~ onPursuant ~~consultation~~to ~~with~~the ~~legal~~terms ~~counsel,~~of wethe doEscrow ~~not believe that any claims~~Agreement, ~~either~~ ~~individually~~funds orwere held in ~~the~~escrow ~~aggregate,~~and towere ~~which~~released at the Company’s iswritten arequest. ~~party~~As ~~will ultimately~~of ~~have~~March a31, ~~material~~2011, ~~adverse~~all ~~effect~~funds onwere ~~our~~released ~~financial~~from ~~condition~~escrow orat ~~results~~ the written permission of ~~operations~~the Note holders.

~~For~~In analyzing this transaction the Company considered all the terms and provisions of the convertible notes and the warrants. As a ~~current~~ ~~report~~result ~~regarding~~of ~~ongoing~~the ~~legal~~down-round ~~proceedings~~feature ~~involving~~discussed above the Company ~~and other~~applied ~~material~~the ~~claims~~provisions of ASC Topic 815-15, ~~reference~~Derivatives and Hedging, and concluded the conversion option is ~~made~~required to ~~Item~~be 3bifurcated offrom ~~Part~~the Ihost ofcontract and adjusted to fair value at each reporting period. The warrants also have the same down-round feature and thus the Company~~’s Annual~~ ~~Report~~has onconcluded ~~Form~~that ~~10-K~~the warrants are required to be classified as a liability and will be adjusted to fair value at each reporting period. In addition, ~~filed~~the ~~with~~Company determined that the ~~Securities~~Note holders right to demand redemption of the notes upon certain events occurring also needs to be bifurcated. The convertible notes were recorded net of a discount of $3,350,000 due to the fair value of the warrants and ~~Exchange~~derivatives ~~Commission~~amounting ~~on July~~to 14$4,258,094 ~~2010~~and $1,593,002, ~~which~~respectively, and being in excess of the principal value of the convertible notes. The difference of $2,501,096 between the discount and the fair value of the warrants and derivatives was recorded as interest expense at issuance. The discount is ~~incorporated~~being ~~herein~~amortized and charged to operations over the two year life of the notes using the effective interest method.

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS.

a) Increase in number of authorized common and preferred shares

On December 22, 2010, the Company’s majority stockholders, by written consent in lieu of a meeting, approved the Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation increasing the Company’s authorized common shares to 150,000,000 and its preferred shares to 5,000,000. The increase will be effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment.

b) Designation of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

On January 6, 2011, the Company filed the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Designation”), with the Secretary of State of Delaware which designates 15,000 of its preferred shares as Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D”). Under the designation, the purchase price per each share of Series D is $300. Each holder of Series D is entitled to 1,000 votes and shall vote in the same class as the common shares. Upon the confirmation by the Secretary of State of the filing of the above-indicated amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation, each share of Series D that is then issued and outstanding will automatically convert into 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The designation provides for penalties to the Company if it fails to convert the Series D shares into common shares within three days from the date the Secretary of State confirms the filing of the amendment to the articles of incorporation.

c) Sale of Series D Preferred Shares

On January 21, 2011the Company entered into purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) with accredited non-U.S. investors (the “Investors”) for the issuance and sale of an aggregate of 7,000 shares of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, for aggregate proceeds equal to $2.1 million. ABG Sundal Collier Norge ASA (“ABG”) who acted as an advisor to the investors in connection with the sale, was issued 280 shares of preferred stock in connection with the sale. The shares will automatically convert into 7,280,000 shares of the Company’s common stock upon the effectiveness of the amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation increasing its authorized common stock, as discussed above.

In connection with the sale, the Investors also were issued two series of warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 (the “Common Stock”). One series consists of two year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 7,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The second series consists of three year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 7,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.60 per share. The warrants do not permit cashless exercise and are closed to exercise for 6 months. ABG also received a two year warrant and three year warrant, each for the purchase of up to 280,000 shares of common stock under the same terms as discussed above.

d) Issuance of Common Shares

On February 10, 2011, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock to The Hewlett Fund in consideration of the conversion $45,000 of their convertible note.

F-14

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The initial fair value of the warrants of $4,258,094 and the initial fair value of the derivatives of $1,593,002 was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The underlying value of the model is Enterprise Value, and each Claim is treated as a Claim on the Enterprise Value. Since the common stock price is not the underlying value, the volatility implied by the model is not equal to the volatility used under a closed-form Black-Scholes model which values the warrants with the common stock as the underlying security. The Enterprise Value volatility used at June 30, 2011 and 2010 was 75.1% and 53.0%, respectively.

Amortization of the discount that was charged to Interest Expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $425,117 and $137,616, respectively. Interest charged to operations on the principal balance of the notes for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 totaled $134,065 and $128,206, respectively.

The following is a summary of amounts related to the notes as of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011. The amounts related to the Statement of Operations are summarized for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

Consolidated Balance Sheet – Assets

	June 30, 2011			March 31, 2011(restated)
Deferred financing fees	$	250,311		$	250,311
Accumulated amortization		(171,178	)		(140,453	)
Net deferred financing fees	$	79,133		$	109,858

Consolidated Balance Sheet – Liabilities

	June 30, 2011			March 31, 2011 (restated)
Face value of Convertible Notes	$	3,350,000		$	3,350,000
Unamortized Original Issue Note Discount		(1,987,849	)		(2,412,966	)
Accrued and unpaid interest		360,740			298,058
Conversions		(146,366	)		(45,000	)
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized discount	$	1,576,525		$	1,190,092

Derivatives Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)		3,823,188			4,534,069
Warrant Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)		12,442,484			12,809,065
Carrying value of notes and liabilities	$	17,482,197		$	18,533,226

Consolidated Statement of Operations

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010 (restated)
Interest Expense – Principal	$	(134,065	)	$	(128,206	)
Interest Expense – Deferred Financing		(30,725	)		(33,275	)
Interest Expense – Loan Discount		(425,117	)		(137,616	)
Change in Convertible Note Warrant Liability		366,581			934,349
Change in Convertible Note Derivative Liability		710,881			1,165,997
	$	487,555		$	1,801,249

F-15

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Working Interest in Oil Properties

In February 2010, the Company sold a 12.5% working interest in the production of newly drilled wells located in Wardlaw Field to Glen Rose Partners I, LLC, (“GRP1”) for $1,000,000. The purchase and sale agreement excludes certain existing producing wells. GRP1 has the right to participate in all non-excluded wells, including wells on the Adamson leases. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company is required to pay all of GRP1’s drilling and production costs until GRP1’s carried costs equal $2,000,000, of which $50,819 had been paid through June 30, 2011. Further, for five years, GRP1 will also have conversion rights to convert its working interest in the Wardlaw Prospect with an imputed value equal to the working interest purchase price as adjusted, into the Company’s common stock in the same manner as the secured convertible notes are convertible, except that GRP1 conversion price shall be 150% of the secured convertible notes’ conversion price in effect as of the conversion date, ($0.45 as of June 30, 2011) provided that the secured convertible notes remain outstanding on the date of such conversion. GRP1 is an affiliate of Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund, LP.

The Company included the $1,000,000 purchase price and is adding the carried interest to the full cost pool in accordance with ASC Topic 932, Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas. The Company considered if the conversion option was required to be bifurcated from the host contract and concluded it did not because the conversion option and the host contract are clearly and closely related.

5. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In January 2008, the Company reincorporated and changed its domicile from Utah to Delaware pursuant to a Reincorporation and Merger Agreement. Prior to the reincorporation, the Company had 120 million common shares authorized. In the reincorporation, the Company believed it maintained the same number of authorized shares. However, by reason of an administrative error on the part of the Company, this was not the case, and only 20 million common shares were authorized for issuance. The Company discovered this technical defect in December 2010 and immediately acted to cure the defect by obtaining majority shareholder approval to increase the number of authorized shares to 150 million which was effective in March 2011.

Stock Issued for Service

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 272,343 shares of common stock to certain members of the Board of Directors and officers as compensation for their services rendered during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. These shares were valued at $134,400 which was charged to operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 52,730 shares of common stock to Point Capital Partners LLC in consideration for financial and accounting services rendered under its contract. The shares were valued at $30,000 which was charged to operations.

Regulation S Offering

In January 2011, the Company entered into purchase agreements with accredited non-U.S. investors for the issuance and sale of an aggregate of 7,000 units. Each unit consisted of 7,000 shares of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and warrants for aggregate proceeds equal to $2,184,000 from the sale. ABG Sundal Collier Norge ASA who acted as an advisor to the investors in connection with the Sale, was issued 280 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the Sale. The Shares were convertible into 7,280,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, automatically upon the effectiveness of an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation increasing its authorized common stock to not less than 125 million shares. The shares were valued at $2,184,000.

Each unit also consisted of one warrant for each common share in which the preferred shares are convertible for a strike price of $0.40 per share exercisable any time prior to the second anniversary of the issue date and one warrant for each common share in which the preferred shares are convertible for a strike price of $0.60 per share exercisable any time prior to the third anniversary of the issue date. The warrants contain anti-dilution provisions that would reset the strike price under certain conditions if the Company issues common stock at a price lower than the applicable strike price within twelve months from the date of issuance (approximately January 2012).

In analyzing this transaction the Company concluded that the Series D preferred stock did not fall under ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities and Equity and as such is classified as equity. The Company also considered whether the conversion option required bifurcation in accordance with ASC Topic 815 and determined that the conversion option and the host contract are clearly and closely related and so bifurcation is not required. As a result of the anti-dilution provisions the warrants are required to be classified as liabilities and adjusted to fair value for the twelve months that the anti-dilution provision is effective (after that time the warrants would be reclassified to equity if they are still outstanding).

F-16

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The Company also considered whether there is a beneficial conversion feature discount as a result of a favorable conversion price. On the commitment date the Company’s stock price was $.57 per share and the conversion price is $.30 per share. However, due to the fair value of the warrant liability none of the proceeds are allocated to the preferred stock. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-20 any beneficial conversion feature would be limited to the proceeds allocated to the preferred stock and so then the beneficial conversion feature discount in this case is $0.

Additionally, the discount of $3,202,906 that results from the fair value of the warrants being in excess of the proceeds is amortized immediately during the fourth quarter when the Series D preferred stock was issued because the preferred stock was converted to common in March 2011.

The Company entered into a purchase agreement dated July 4, 2011 with accredited non-U.S. investors for the sale of 4,292,990 shares of the Company’s common stock, for proceeds equal to $1,921,810. An additional 373,430 shares were issued to ABG Sundal Collier Norge ASA, as a fee for acting as an advisor to the investors in connection with the transaction. The price per share for the Shares was $0.45. The investor also received two year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 4,292,990 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.45. The warrants contain anti-dilution provisions that would reset the strike price under certain conditions if the Company issues common stock at a price lower than the applicable strike price within twelve months from the date of issuance (approximately July 2012). The warrants do not permit cashless exercise and are closed to exercise for six months. The shares and warrants were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration afforded under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions involving an offering and sale exclusively to non-U.S. persons.

6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Option Plans

In January 2008, our board of directors approved and adopted the United Heritage Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Company reserved 5,000,000 shares of common stock for awards that will be granted from the Plan. The awards are subject to adjustment in the event of stock dividends, recapitalizations, stock splits, reverse stock splits, subdivisions, combinations, reclassifications or similar changes in our capital structure. The Plan became effective upon adoption by the board, and, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions thereof, will remain in effect for a period of ten years from the date of adoption. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010 there were no awards outstanding under the Plan.

Directors of the Company adopted the 1995 Stock Option Plan effective September 11, 1995. This Plan and its subsequent amendment set aside 66,667 shares of the authorized but unissued common stock of the Company for issuance under the Plan. Options may be granted to directors, officers, consultants, and/or employees of the Company and/or its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2010 and 2011 there were no awards outstanding under the Plan.

Directors of the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Option Plan effective July 1, 1998. This Plan and its subsequent amendment set aside 66,667 shares of the authorized but unissued common stock of the Company for issuance under the Plan. Options may be granted to directors, officers, consultants, and/or employees of the Company and/or its subsidiaries. Options granted under the Plan are exercisable over a period to be determined when granted, but may be affected by the termination of employment. As of June 30, 2010 and 2011 there were no awards outstanding under the Plan.

Directors of the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Option Plan effective June 5, 2000. This Plan set aside 1,666,667 shares of the authorized but unissued common stock of the Company for issuance under the Plan. Options may be granted to directors, officers, consultants, advisors, and/or employees of the Company and/or its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2010 and 2011 there were no awards outstanding under the Plan.

F-17

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Options granted under the Plan must be exercised within the number of years determined by the Stock Option Committee and allowed in the Stock Option Agreement. The Stock Option Agreement may provide that a period of time must elapse after the date of grant before the options are exercisable. The options may not be exercised as to less than 100 shares at any one time.

Director’s compensation was amended on June 30, 2008. Under the revised plan, each director can choose each month to receive either $5,000 in the form of the Company’s common stock or stock options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock. The option price is equal to the Company’s closing average bid price for the previous ended quarter. The previous agreement provided for 5,000 stock purchase options per month, with the price to be calculated on the average closing bid price for the month. Under the Plan, 150,000 stock options were granted to the Company’s Directors during the years ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010. 15,000 options were retired as part of the litigation settlement with Joseph F. Langston Jr. 75,000 stock options remain outstanding under this Plan as of June 30, 2011.

During the year ended March 31, 2008, 100,000 stock options were issued to an employee and were not part of the plans mentioned above. These options expired as of June 30, 2011.

The director’s compensation was changed on April 1, 2010 to 20,000 shares of common stock per month delivered quarterly in advance. On June 30, 2011, the Board of Directors changed the director compensation to be 20,000 shares of common stock per month, earned in arrears at the end of each month served, and issued quarterly.

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to estimate the option fair values. The option-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are the risk free rate, the expected stock price volatility, the expected pre-vesting forfeiture rate and the expected option term (the amount of time from the grant date until the options are exercised or expire). The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatility was calculated based upon actual historical stock price movements over the most recent periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010. The expected option term was calculated based on the vesting period. The expected forfeiture rate is based on historical experience and expectations about future forfeitures.

No stock options were granted during the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

The following is an option activity summary under the plans for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

	Number of Stock Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, March 31, 2011		235,000		$	0.78		0.44	$	13,950

Forfeited or expired		(160,000	)	$	-		-

Outstanding, June 30, 2011		75,000		$	0.57		0.67	$	12,150

Exercisable June 30, 2011		75,000		$	0.57		0.67	$	12,150

No options were exercised in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. No options remained unvested as of June 30, 2011.

The following schedule summarizes pertinent information with regard to the stock warrants for the quarter ended June 30, 2011:

F-18

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

	2011
	Shares Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Beginning of year:		50,936,532	$	0.72
Granted		25,000		0.40
End of period		50,961,532	$	0.72
Exercisable		50,961,532	$	0.72

For the period from May 22, 2008 through March 7, 2011, the Company has recorded the warrants as liabilities and adjusted the carrying amount to fair value each reporting period. The warrants issued with the convertible notes in March 2010 and the warrants issued as part of the January 2011 Series D convertible preferred stock offering continue to be classified as liabilities. Additionally 1,335,000 warrants owed to certain consultants were owed to them prior to March 31, 2011 but not issued until subsequent to March 31, 2011 and thus the Company is recording them as liabilities until the date the warrant agreements are executed and the terms confirmed (warrant agreements were executed in July 2011). All other remaining warrants have been re-classified to stockholders’ equity as of March 7, 2011. The following table shows the change in the value of the warrant liability for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

`Warrant liability balance March 31, 2011	$	670,395
Change in fair value of warrant liability		(32,074	)
Warrant liability balance June 30, 2011	$	638,321

7. FAIR VALUE

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:

Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.

Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

As of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 the Company had assets and liabilities that fell under the scope of ASC 820. The carrying value of accounts receivable, notes receivable and accounts payable and accrued interest all approximate their fair value due to the short term nature. The fair value of the warrant liabilities were determined by the Monte Carlo simulation method. The Monte Carlo simulation is a generally accepted statistical method used to generate a defined number of stock paths in order to develop a reasonable estimate of the range of future expected stock prices of the Company and its peer group and minimizes standard error. Please see Notes 1, and 4 for discussion regarding the determination of fair value for these liabilities. Accordingly, the Company’s fair value measurements of the Company’s warrant liability and derivative liabilities are classified as a Level 3 input.

F-19

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis are as follows:

	June 30, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Warrant Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)	$	-	$	-	$	12,442,484	$	12,442,484
Derivatives Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)	$	-	$	-	$	3,823,188	$	3,823,188
Warrant Liability - ABG	$	-	$	-	$	4,317,891	$	4,317,891
Warrant liability - Other	$	-	$	-	$	638,321	$	638,395

	March 31, 2011 Fair Value Measurements
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Warrant Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)	$	-	$	-	$	12,809,065	$	12,809,065
Derivatives Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)	$	-	$	-	$	4,534,069	$	4,534,069
Warrant liability - ABG	$	-	$	-	$	5,860,509	$	5,860,509
Warrant liability - Other	$	-	$	-	$	670,395	$	670,395

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 liabilities for the quarter ended June 30, 2011:

			Fair Value					Cancellation,
	Balance at		of warrants		Unrealized			termination,		Balance at
	March 31,		upon		(gains) or			And		June 30,
Description	2011		issuance		losses			reclassification		2011
Warrant Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)	$	12,809,065	$	-	$	(366,581	)	$	-	$	12,442,484
Derivatives Liability – Convertible Note (Iroquois)	$	4,534,069	$	-	$	(710,881	)	$	-	$	3,823,188
Warrant Liability - ABG	$	5,860,509	$	-	$	(1,542,618	)	$	-	$	4,317,891
Warrant liability - Other	$	670,395	$	-	$	(32,074	)	$	-	$	638,321

The unrealized gains or losses on warrant or derivative liabilities are recorded as a change in fair value of warrant or derivative liabilities in the Company's statement of operations. A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At each reporting period, the Company reviews the assets and liabilities that are subject to ASC Topic 815-40. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as Level 3.

F-20

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Paradigm Lift Technologies, LLC v. UHC Petroleum Corporation

On September 21, 2009 Paradigm Lift Technologies, LLC filed a lawsuit against UHC Petroleum Corporation in the 63rd District Court in Edwards County, Texas for sworn account for equipment allegedly purchased by UHC Petroleum Corporation. The case is in the discovery stage and the Company will continue to vigorously defend its position.

Jeff Toth v. Glen Rose Petroleum Corp.

On January 27, 2010, Jeff Toth filed a petition in the 63rd District Court in Edwards County, Texas against Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation for trespass, surface damage, and use of filler. The petition was served on February 18, 2010 and is in the discovery period and the parties have submitted to mediation.

Langston Family Partnership and Buccaneer Energy Corporation v. Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation

On October 9, 2009, an action was commenced in the District Court in Kaufman County, Texas, by Langston Family Limited Partnership and Buccaneer Energy Corporation against the Company seeking recovery of funds and compensation for services allegedly advanced to the Company. The Company was served in March 2010 and defended the action. The action was amended on May 4, 2010 to, among other things, add Mr. Langston as a plaintiff. See, also Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation v. Joseph Langston, below. As of August 2, 2011, this matter, along with the related matter of Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation v. Joseph Langston, below, was settled. Langston agreed to discontinue and withdraw his claims with prejudice in exchange for receiving $80,000 in a lump sum payment and $3,333 each month for twelve (12) months thereafter and returning to the Company all shares of the Company’s common stock in which he or anyone related to him had beneficial control or ownership.

Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation v. Joseph Langston

On April 1, 2010, the Company filed an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Mr. Langston, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, based upon alleged breaches of fiduciary duties as an officer and director of the Company and alleged self-dealing. On July 8, 2010, the Court denied jurisdiction in Delaware due to the prior action of Mr. Langston in Kaufman County, Texas, and directed the Company to proceed in the Texas Court. See also, Langston Family Partnership and Langston Family Partnership and Buccaneer Energy Corporation, above, which was settled. As of August 2, 2011, the Company agreed to discontinue its claims and pay Langston $80,000 in a lump sum payment and $3,333 each month for twelve (12) months thereafter in consideration for Langston returning to the Company all shares of the Company’s common stock in which he or anyone related to him had beneficial control or ownership.

Pernice v. Glen Rose Petroleum, et. al.

On or about April 15, 2011, the Company was advised of an action filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court, in the State of California, by an individual against the Company and others, including Blackwood Capital Limited and Andrew Taylor-Kimmins, our CEO. The claim alleges, among other things, breach of contract and negligent misrepresentations arising out of a proposed transaction related to certain securities and indebtedness of the Company purportedly held by the individual. On June 13, 2011, the parties agreed to a settlement that includes a lump sum payment to Mr. Pernice of $110,267 which was paid on July 27, 2011.

Potential Shareholder Derivative Litigation

On June 25, 2010, the Company was advised by its counsel in the Langston matters that the firm received a letter from Mr. Langston’s counsel purportedly constituting a notice to the Company and its directors of “a potential shareholder derivative lawsuit against the officer and directors of Glen Rose Petroleum”.

In the course of events, this matter no longer is applicable due to a settlement having been reached between the Company and Langston (see Langston Family Partnership and Buccaneer Energy Corporation v. Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation, above, and Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation v. Joseph Langston, above).

F-21

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Other

The Company does not have any other litigation current or contemplated. However, the Company terminated Geoff Beatson, an engineering consultant, and has taken issue with various vendors, any of which could result in litigation, which the Company will vigorously pursue and defend.

Also, the Company may routinely be involved in government administrative proceedings relating to our oil and gas operations. The Texas Railroad Commission regulates the oil and gas industry in Texas and Texas law requires that the Texas Railroad Commission issue permits for a variety of activities. The Company can provide no assurance that all of the Company’s requested permits will be granted.

9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 4, 2011 the Company entered into a purchase agreement with accredited non-U.S. investors for the sale of 4,292,990 shares of the Company’s common stock, for proceeds equal to $1,931,846. An additional 373,430 shares were issued to ABG Sundal Collier Norge ASA, as a fee for acting as an advisor to the investors in connection with the transaction. The price per share for the Shares was $0.45. The investor also received two year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 4,292,990 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.45. The warrants do not permit cashless exercise and are closed to exercise for six months. The shares and warrants were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration afforded under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions involving an offering and sale exclusively to non-U.S. persons.

On September 15, 2011 the Company exercised its right to extend the maturity of its Lothian Oil Notes Payable (Put Option) obligation, including accrued interest, till September 30, 2012.

F-22

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition, plan of operation and liquidity should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and our audited financial statements and the notes thereto and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2010~~2011.

OVERVIEW

Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation (“Glen Rose”) is a Delaware corporation formed in 2008. The Company was previously United Heritage Corporation, a Utah corporation that was formed in 1981 and was reincorporated in Delaware in 2008. The reincorporation entailed a reincorporation merger agreement between Glen Rose Petroleum Company and United Heritage Corporation, but there were no substantive changes in assets or personnel and we also have continuous financial reporting through the reincorporation.

Glen Rose owns UHC Petroleum Corporation (“UHC Petroleum”), a Texas corporation, ~~which~~and ~~is a~~ licensed operator with the Texas Railroad Commission. UHC Petroleum is an independent producer of crude oil, based in Katy, Texas. UHC Petroleum operates the Wardlaw ~~Field. The~~Lease ~~Wardlaw~~and ~~Field~~Adamson ~~lies~~Lease in(collectively, ~~Edwards~~the ~~County~~“leaseholds”), ~~Texas~~ inlocated ~~the~~approximately ~~southeast~~28 ~~portion~~miles west of ~~the~~Rocksprings ~~Val~~in ~~Verde~~Edwards ~~Basin~~County, ~~and~~Texas. isThe ~~approximately~~leaseholds ~~28 miles~~lie ~~west~~in ofthe ~~Rocksprings~~southeast ~~and~~portion ~~550~~of ~~miles~~the ~~west~~Val ofVerde ~~Dallas. Current~~Basin with oil production from the field ~~comes~~currently coming from the Glen Rose formation at a depth of less than 600 feet. The ~~Company’s~~Wardlaw ~~petroleum~~Lease ~~leaseholds~~consists ~~consist~~ of approximately 10,~~502~~562 gross acres, of which ~~more~~approximately ~~than~~ 10,~~000~~500 gross acres are undeveloped. The Adamson Lease consists of approximately 837 gross acres, of which all are undeveloped. The leaseholds currently include 85 wellbores. Of these, 75 are capable of producing. ~~The~~With ~~Company~~one ~~has~~swabbing ~~recorded~~unit, ~~and~~currently ~~installed~~we ~~pumps on~~are 48daily ofproducing ~~these~~from ~~wellbores~~35 ~~and~~wells. isWe are in the process of ~~ongoing~~evaluating ~~evaluation to determine which of~~ the ~~available~~remaining 75wells. ~~wellbores~~In ~~are~~certain ~~best~~older ~~suited~~wells, ~~for~~UHC ~~production.~~Petroleum ~~We are~~operates ~~currently~~and ~~producing~~owns ~~between~~a 85gross -working ~~105~~interest ~~barrels~~ of ~~oil~~100% ~~per day~~ and ~~look~~a ~~to increase~~net ~~this~~revenue tointerest aof ~~target~~75% of ~~125~~the -current ~~150~~Wardlaw ~~barrels~~Lease ~~per~~production. ~~day~~In ~~upon~~other wells, including the ~~completion~~new ofwells ~~an evaluation~~which ofUHC ~~all~~Petroleum ~~wells~~is ~~and~~developing, ~~processes.~~UHC Petroleum ~~has~~operates and owns a gross working interest of ~~100~~ 87.5% and a net revenue interest of 7565.625% of the current Wardlaw ~~Field~~Lease production. In such cases, the remaining 12.5% working interest and net revenue interest of 9.375% is owned by a separate but related entity called Glen Rose Partners 1, LLC, which is owned and controlled by substantially the same members as Iroquois Capital, a creditor of the Company. The original lease term was extended by a period of 90 days each time a well was drilled; therefore, based on prior drilling, the primary lease term is currently extended to 2014.

We produce a raw commodity. Currently one purchaser, Enterprise Crude Oil, LLC, buys 100% of our production. However, we believe that other purchasers are available for our production. Our customer risk primarily stems from the purchaser’s solvency relating to outstanding balances. The purchaser has historically timely paid and we have no information that would indicate that it would be unable to continue paying in the future.

We have no patents, trademarks, material license agreements, franchises, or labor contracts.

In addition to UHC Petroleum, Glen Rose also owns, UHC Petroleum Services Corporation (“UHC Services”) a Texas corporation. Our other subsidiary is National Heritage Sales Corporation, a Texas corporation. National Heritage Sales Corporation has not operated for a number of years, and the Company plans to wind up this corporation in the coming year. Until recently, UHC New Mexico Corporation was a non-operating subsidiary of Glen Rose. Pursuant to a Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 12, 2010, it was sold to Blackwood Capital Limited, a company controlled by our Chief Executive Officer. At the time of the sale, it had no assets but was subject to a current UCC filing and ongoing expenses relating to maintaining its corporate existence. Glen Rose determined that the expense of enforcing and collecting the indebtedness of UHC New Mexico Corporation owing to Glen Rose likely would exceed the proceeds realized by Glen Rose from such enforcement and collection activities. Accordingly, Glen Rose approved the cancellation and forgiveness of such indebtedness effective as of the date of the closing on the sale to Blackwood Capital Limited.

~~The Company~~GLEN ~~entered~~ROSE ~~into~~PETROLEUM aCORPORATION ~~new~~AND lease on June 14, 2010 with Carol Ann Adamson, who is Trustee of the Sandra Jym Adamson Trust, as well as the agent and attorney-in-fact for Sandra Jym Adamson. The lease is adjacent to the Company’s Wardlaw lease and consists of 665 acres. The term is for 3 years, which will pay royalties in the amount of 20% of the gross production, with an option for a further 779 acres to be leased at $50 per acre for not less than 160 acres every 6 months.SUBSIDIARIES

~~We produce~~NOTES aTO ~~raw~~CONSOLIDATED ~~commodity.~~FINANCIAL Currently one purchaser buys 100% of our production. However, we believe that other purchasers are available for our production. Our customer risk primarily stems from the purchaser’s solvency relating to outstanding balances. The purchaser has historically paid in a timely manner and we have no information that would indicate that it would be unable to continue paying in the future.STATEMENTS

~~We have no patents, trademarks, material intellectual property license agreements, franchises, or labor contracts.~~(Unaudited)

In addition to Petroleum, Glen Rose also owns, UHC Petroleum Services Corporation (“Services”) a Texas corporation. Our other subsidiary is National Heritage Sales Corporation, a Texas corporation. National Heritage Sales Corporation has not operated for a number of years, and the Company plans to wind up this corporation in the coming year. Until recently, UHC New Mexico Corporation was a non-operating subsidiary of Glen Rose. Pursuant to a Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 12, 2010, it was sold to Blackwood Capital Limited, a company controlled by our Chief Executive Officer. At the time of the sale, it had no assets but was subject to a current UCC filing and ongoing expenses relating to maintaining its corporate existence. Glen Rose determined that the expense of enforcing and collecting the indebtedness of UHC New Mexico Corporation owing to Glen Rose likely would exceed the proceeds realized by Glen Rose from such enforcement and collection activities. Accordingly, Glen Rose approved the cancellation and forgiveness of such indebtedness effective as of the date of the closing on the sale to Blackwood Capital Limited.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation (referred to as the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”), contains certain forward-looking statements and information based upon the beliefs of, and data currently available to, our management, as well as estimates and assumptions made by our management regarding the Company’s financial condition, future operating performance, results of operations and other statements that are not statements of historical fact. The words “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan” “forecast” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements appear in a number of places in this Form 10-Q and reflect the current view of our management with respect to future events. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain important risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors relating to our industry and operations which could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected intended or planned. Some of these risks include, among other things:

whether we will be able to find financing/produce cash flows to continue/expand our operations;

whether changes in regulatory requirements will adversely affect our business;

environmental risks;

volatility in commodity prices, supply of, and demand for, oil and natural gas;

whether the recovery methods that we use in or will use in our oil and gas operations succeed;

the ability of our management to execute its plans to meet its goals;

general economic conditions, whether internationally, nationally, or in the regional and local markets in which we operate, which may be less favorable than expected;

the difficulty of estimating the presence or recoverability of oil and natural gas resources and future production rates and associated costs;

the ability to retain key members of management and key employees and to attract additional talent as required;

drilling and operating risks and expense cost escalations; and

other uncertainties, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.

Except as otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report Form 10-Q after the date of this report.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

GOING CONCERN STATUS

~~Our~~ The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. As ofThe ~~the~~Company ~~filing~~has ~~date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we have~~ incurred substantial losses from ~~our~~ operations and we ~~have~~it ahas ~~working~~negative ~~capital~~operating ~~deficit~~cash flows which raises substantial doubt asabout toits ~~our~~ ability to continue as a going concern. We ~~had~~The ~~net~~Company ~~loss~~had ~~of $3,537,937 for the nine months ended December, 2010 and a~~ net ~~loss~~income of $21,~~509~~268,~~790~~871 for the ~~fiscal~~ ~~year~~quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2010. As~~2011 ofand ~~the~~has ~~same periods, we had~~ an accumulated deficit of $5466,~~480~~715,~~496 and $50~~679,~~942,560, respectively. Unless~~ weat ~~are~~June ~~able to attract the financing needed to develop our properties~~30, ~~there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue as a going concern~~2011.

~~Management is~~The ~~currently~~Company ~~reviewing~~intends ~~the~~to ~~Company’s~~continue ~~operations~~its ~~with~~planned ~~the~~capital ~~intent~~expenditure ofto ~~increasing revenue~~continue ~~and~~its ~~reducing~~reworking ~~expenses.~~and Indrilling ~~addition~~programs, ~~Management~~but isdoes ~~also~~not ~~seeking~~have ~~funding with~~sufficient ~~third~~realized ~~parties~~revenues ~~through~~and ~~the~~cash ~~issuance~~on ofhand ~~debt~~is ~~and~~not ~~equity~~adequate ~~and~~to ~~through attracting~~cover ~~tax-benefitted~~immediate ~~investment~~cash needs. ~~In addition~~However, ~~we are also in discussions with third parties regarding sharing arrangements relating to our interest in~~ the ~~Wardlaw~~Company ~~Field~~expects ~~including~~revenues ~~farm~~from ~~outs.~~production ~~There~~will isbe noenough ~~assurance that our attempts~~ to ~~obtain~~cover ~~funding~~operating orexpenses ~~find a suitable party~~ in ~~connection with~~ the ~~further development~~near ~~of the Wardlaw Field will be successful~~term.

~~CRITICAL ACCOUNTING~~Although ~~POLICIES~~the ~~AND~~Company ~~ESTIMATES~~obtained additional financing of approximately $1.9 million in July 2011 (see Note 8), which provided the needed funds for continued operations and drilling program in the short term, the Company can provide no assurance that it will be able to obtain sufficient additional financing that it needs to develop its properties and alleviate doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. If the Company is able to obtain sufficient additional financing proceeds, the Company cannot be certain that this additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, the Company’s stockholders may experience significant dilution. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that impact the Company’s ability to conduct business. Furthermore, certain of the Company’s current creditors may be required to approve any such transaction.

~~Our critical~~The ~~accounting~~consolidated ~~policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying those policies, are more fully described in the notes to our audited~~ financial statements ~~contained~~do in our annual reports on Forms 10-K for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009. We have consistently applied these policies in all material respects. Investors are cautioned, however, that these policies are not ~~guarantees~~include ofany ~~future~~adjustments ~~performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and~~ that ~~actual~~might ~~results~~result ~~may~~from ~~differ materially. Set forth below are~~ the ~~accounting~~outcome ~~policies that we believe most critical to an understanding~~ of ~~our~~this ~~financial condition and liquidity~~uncertainty.

~~Oil and Gas Properties~~Restatement

~~Proved~~During ~~Reserves~~the -January ~~Proved reserves~~2011 ~~are~~offering ~~defined~~of byconvertible ~~the~~preferred ~~Securities~~stock ~~and~~(“Regulation ~~Exchange~~S ~~Commission~~Offering”) aswith ~~those~~warrants ~~volumes of~~the ~~crude~~Company ~~oil;~~realized ~~condensate,~~that ~~natural~~on ~~gas~~May ~~liquids~~22, ~~and~~2008 ~~natural~~when ~~gas~~it ~~that~~entered ~~geological and~~into ~~engineering~~a ~~data~~statutory ~~demonstrate~~merger ~~with~~whereby ~~reasonable~~it ~~certainty~~moved ~~are~~its ~~recoverable~~state of incorporation from ~~known~~ ~~reservoirs~~Utah ~~under~~to ~~existing~~Delaware ~~economic~~(See ~~and~~Note ~~operating~~5) ~~conditions.~~the ~~Proved developed~~number ~~reserves~~of ~~are~~authorized ~~volumes~~shares ~~expected~~was toinadvertently bechanged ~~recovered~~from ~~through~~125,000,000 ~~existing~~to ~~wells~~ 20,000,000. In conjunction with ~~existing~~the ~~equipment~~January ~~and~~2011 ~~operating~~Regulation ~~methods.~~S ~~Although~~Offering, ~~our~~the ~~engineers~~Company ~~are knowledgeable~~applied to the State of ~~and~~Delaware ~~follow~~to ~~the~~authorize ~~guidelines~~150,000,000 ~~for~~shares ~~reserves~~of ~~established~~common bystock, ~~the Securities~~which ~~and~~was ~~Exchange~~completed ~~Commission~~on March 7, ~~the~~2011. ~~estimation~~For ofthe ~~reserves~~period ~~requires engineers~~from toMay ~~make~~22, a2008 ~~significant~~through ~~number~~March of7, ~~assumptions~~2011, ~~based~~the onCompany ~~professional judgment. Reserve~~had ~~estimates~~warrants ~~have~~outstanding ~~been~~in ~~updated~~excess atof ~~least~~the ~~annually~~authorized and ~~consider~~ ~~recent~~unissued ~~production~~common ~~levels~~shares and ~~other~~as ~~technical~~such ~~information~~in ~~about~~accordance ~~each well.~~with ~~Estimated~~ASC ~~reserves~~Topic ~~are~~815, ~~often~~Derivatives ~~subject~~and toHedging, ~~future~~these ~~revision,~~warrants ~~which~~should ~~could~~have ~~be substantial~~been classified as liabilities. In addition, ~~based~~as onpart of the ~~availability~~process of ~~additional~~closing ~~information~~the ~~including: reservoir~~Company’s ~~performance;~~financial ~~new~~records ~~geological~~for ~~and~~the ~~geophysical~~year ~~data,~~ended ~~including~~March ~~that provided~~31, by2011, ~~additional~~it ~~drilling;~~noted ~~technological~~the ~~advancements;~~convertible ~~price~~debt and ~~cost changes;~~warrants issued in March 2010 and other ~~economic~~transactions ~~factors~~were not recorded correctly. ~~Changes~~ inThe ~~oil~~conversion ~~and~~option, ~~gas~~which ~~prices can~~includes ~~lead~~certain toanti-dilution provisions, and a ~~decision~~put tooption ~~start-up~~that orincludes ~~shut-in~~a ~~production~~20% premium, ~~which~~should ~~can~~have ~~lead~~been ~~to revisions~~bifurcated from the host contract and adjusted to ~~reserve~~fair ~~quantities~~value in accordance with ASC Topic 815. ~~Reserve~~In ~~revisions~~addition inthe ~~turn~~warrants ~~cause~~also ~~adjustments~~contain anti-dilution provisions that require liability classification in ~~the~~ ~~depletion~~accordance ~~rates~~with ~~utilized~~ASC byTopic 815. As a result, the Company~~. The~~ ~~Company~~concluded ~~cannot predict~~that ~~what~~its ~~reserve~~annual ~~revisions~~financial ~~may~~statements befor the year ended March 31, 2010 as well as its quarterly financial statements for the quarters ended within the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, required ina ~~future periods~~restatement to reflect these changes.

A summary of significant effects of the restatement follows:

On May 22, 2008, the Company had 20,307,087 warrants outstanding that carried a fair value of $11,926,934 as of that date and a fair value of $1,784,348 as of March 31, 2009. As of May 22, 2008, the Company made an adjustment to reclassify the warrants from equity to a liability and at March 31, 2009 the fair value was adjusted. For the year ended March 31, 2010, 3,733,332 warrants at a fair value of $536,746 at grant date were issued and 9,000,000 warrants at a fair value of $1,391,493 at termination date were cancelled. At March 31, 2010 the fair value of the warrants outstanding, not including the warrants issued with the convertible notes, was $3,992,172. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, 4,183,336 warrants at a fair value of $747,926 at grant date were issued. On March 7, 2011, the fair value of the warrants outstanding, not including the warrants issued with convertible notes or with the January 2011 Regulation S Offering or 1,335,000 warrants due to certain consultants (see note 5) was $4,525,117 and was reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

~~Depletion rates~~GLEN ~~are~~ROSE ~~determined~~PETROLEUM ~~based~~CORPORATION onAND reserve quantity estimates and the capitalized costs of producing properties. As the estimated reserves are adjusted, the depletion expense for a property will change, assuming no change in production volumes or in the costs capitalized. Estimated reserves are used as the basis for calculating the expected future cash flows from a property, which are used to determine whether that property’s reported value may be impaired. Reserves are also used to estimate the supplemental disclosure of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to oil and gas producing activities and reserve quantities in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in our March 31, 2010 Form 10-K. Changes in the estimated reserves are considered changes in estimates for accounting purposes and are reflected on a prospective basis.SUBSIDIARIES

WeNOTES ~~employ the~~TO ~~full~~CONSOLIDATED ~~cost~~FINANCIAL method of accounting for our oil and gas production assets, which are located in the southwestern United States. Under the full cost method, all costs associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties are capitalized and accumulated in cost centers on a country-by-country basis. The sum of net capitalized costs and estimated future development and dismantlement costs for each cost center is depleted on the equivalent unit-of-production basis using proved oil and gas reserves as determined by independent petroleum engineers.STATEMENTS

~~Net capitalized costs are limited to the lower of unamortized cost net of related deferred tax or the cost center ceiling. The cost center ceiling is defined as the sum of~~ (iUnaudited) estimated future net revenues, discounted at 10% per annum, from proved reserves, based on un-escalated year-end prices and costs; (ii) the cost of properties not being amortized; (iii) the lower of cost or market value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized; less (iv) income tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the oil and gas properties.

The ~~ceiling~~ ~~test~~convertible isnotes ~~affected~~issued byon March 3, 2010 included anti-dilution provisions in the conversion option and the warrants that allow for a ~~decrease~~reset of the respective conversion and exercise prices in ~~net~~certain ~~cash~~situations ~~flow~~when ~~from~~the ~~reserves~~Company ~~due~~issues common shares at a lower price. Additionally, the convertible notes include a provision that allows the creditors to ~~higher~~ ~~operating~~put orthe ~~finding~~notes ~~costs~~back orto ~~reduction~~the Company at a 20% premium in ~~market~~certain ~~prices~~change ~~for~~of ~~natural~~control ~~gas and~~or ~~crude~~default ~~oil~~situations. ~~These~~ ~~changes~~In ~~can~~order ~~reduce~~to determine the ~~amount~~fair value of ~~economically producible~~the ~~reserves~~embedded derivatives and the warrant liability the Company utilized a Monte Carlo simulation methodology. If As of March 3, 2010, the ~~cost~~fair ~~center~~value ~~ceiling~~of ~~falls~~the ~~below~~derivatives was $1,593,002 and the ~~capitalized~~ ~~cost~~fair ~~for~~value of the ~~cost~~warrant ~~center~~liability was $4,258,094. weDue ~~would~~to bethe ~~required~~number of common shares on a fully-diluted basis offered to ~~report~~the ~~an impairment~~creditors, the fair value of the ~~cost~~derivatives ~~center’s~~and ~~oil~~the warrant liability exceeded the principal amount of the convertible notes and ~~gas~~so ~~assets~~the atCompany recorded interest expense of $2,501,096 upon the ~~reporting~~ date of issuance. The original issue discount of $3,350,000 is being amortized over the life of the debt using the effective interest rate method and for the year ended March 31, 2010 the amortization was $38,548. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the amortization of the debt discount was $137,616.

~~Impairment~~Stock ofbased ~~Properties~~compensation -expense ~~We will continue to monitor our long-lived assets recorded in oil and gas properties in our consolidated balance sheet to ensure they are fairly presented. We must evaluate our properties~~ for ~~potential impairment when circumstances indicate that~~ the ~~carrying~~quarter ~~value~~ended ofJune an30, ~~asset~~2010 ~~could exceed its fair value. A significant amount~~ of ~~judgment~~$326,557 iswas ~~involved~~reclassed ~~in performing~~from ~~these~~a ~~evaluations~~separate ~~since~~category ~~the~~for ~~results~~stock ~~are~~ based oncompensation ~~estimated~~in ~~future events. Such events include a projection of future oil and natural gas sales prices, an estimate of~~ the ~~ultimate~~statement ~~amount~~ of ~~recoverable~~operations ~~oil~~to general and ~~gas reserves~~administrative ~~that~~expense ~~will~~in beaccordance ~~produced~~with ~~from~~ASC aTopic ~~field~~718, ~~the~~Stock ~~timing~~Compensation. ofAdditionally ~~future production~~$548, ~~future~~950 ~~production~~of ~~costs,~~stock ~~and future inflation. The need to test a property for impairment can be~~ based oncompensation ~~several~~related ~~factors, including a significant reduction in sales prices for oil and/or gas, unfavorable adjustment~~ to ~~reserves,~~ orwarrants ~~other~~issued ~~changes~~ to ~~contracts,~~consultants ~~environmental~~was ~~regulations~~recorded ~~or tax laws. All of these factors must be considered when testing a property's carrying value~~ for ~~impairment. We~~the ~~cannot~~quarter ~~predict~~ended ~~whether impairment~~June ~~charges~~30, ~~may be required in the future~~2010.

~~Revenue~~Independent ~~Recognition~~petroleum -engineers ~~Oil~~have estimated the Company’s proved oil and gas ~~production~~reserves, ~~revenues~~all of which are ~~recognized~~located atin Edwards County, Texas. Proved reserves are the ~~point~~estimated quantities that geologic and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of ~~sale~~reservoir data, such estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. ~~Production~~The ~~not~~reserves ~~sold at~~actually recovered and the ~~end~~timing of production of these reserves may be substantially different from the original estimate. Revisions result primarily from new information obtained from development drilling and production history and from changes in economic factors. The original reserve report for fiscal year isended ~~included~~March as31, ~~inventory~~2010 atwas not prepared in compliance with the ~~lower~~Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and accounting standards, which require that calculations be based on the twelve month un-weighted first-day-of ~~cost~~–the-month ~~or market~~average ~~value~~price for March 31, 2010. As such, the Company corrected the report and restated the related disclosures in the supplementary financial information in the Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011. The effect of these adjustments was not material to the recorded depreciation, depletion and accretion amounts reported for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Income Taxes - Included in our net deferred tax assets are approximately $4,977,000 of potential future tax benefits from prior unused tax losses (“net operating loss carry-forwards”). Realization of these tax assets depends on sufficient future taxable income before the benefits expire. We are unsure if we will have sufficient future taxable income to utilize the benefits from net operating loss carry-forwards before the losses expire. Therefore, we have provided an allowance for the full amount of the net deferred tax asset. Moreover, our recent change of majority ownership significantly reduced our ability to utilize our net operating losses carry-forwards.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (As Previously Reported)			Amount of Change			Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 (As Restated)
Statement of Operations
Production and Operating	$	140,845		$	29,146		$	169,991
Impairment of field equipment		66,739			(66,739	)		-
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		17,598			(3,567	)		14,031
General and administrative		727,421			875,507			1,602,928
Stock based compensation		326,557			(326,557	)		-
Interest Expense		(358,807	)		18,461			(340,346	)
Change in value of warrant liability		-			1,805,040			1,805,040
Change in value of warrant liability - Iroquois		-			934,349			934,349
Change in value of derivative liability - Iroquois		-			1,165,997			1,165,997
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,565,690	)	$	3,416,058		$	1,850,369
Basic Earnings per common share	$	(0.12	)	$	0.23		$	0.11
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	(0.12	)	$	0.18		$	0.06

Accounting Estimates - Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. In particular, there is significant judgment required to estimate oil and gas reserves, impairment of unproved properties and asset retirement obligations. Actual results could vary significantly from the results that are obtained by using management’s estimates as well as those of independent third-party petroleum engineering firms.

~~Convertible~~GLEN ~~Debentures~~ROSE -PETROLEUM ~~If the~~CORPORATION ~~conversion~~AND feature of conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded as a debt discount pursuant to EITF Issue No. 98-5 (“EITF 98-05”), Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingency Adjustable Conversion Ratio, and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of EITF Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments. In those circumstances, the convertible debt will be recorded net of the discount related to the BCF. The Company amortizes the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~The following~~Three ~~comparison~~Months ofEnded ~~selected~~June ~~financial data for the three months and nine months ended December 31~~30, ~~2010~~2011 and financial data for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2009 are derived from our unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. This information is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, such financial statements and related notes contained therein.2010

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	December 31,				December 31,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
Income Data
Revenues	$	477,403		33,660		747,640		97,801
Depreciation, depletion and accretion		117,181		7,198		205,692		37,774
Total operating costs and expenses		1,077,393		401,791		3,284,280		979,984
Loss from operations		(599,990)		(368,131)		(2,536,640)		(882,183)	)
Income tax		-		-		-		-
Net loss	$	(955,978)		(398,474)		(3,537,937)		(984,268)	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.05)		(0.03)		(0.20)		(0.09)	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		17,577,055		11,541,361		17,265,027		11,541,361

Our revenues increased $295,437 or approximately 1,072%, to $322,997 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $27,560 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in revenue in 2011 compared to 2010 was due to significant increase in production due to new development and the reworking of our wells.

~~Oil~~ Our total production and ~~Gas~~operating ~~Results~~costs and expenses increased $64,203 or approximately 38%, to $234,194 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $169,991 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in our production and operating expenses was primarily attributable to increased hours spent by employees on operating and production activities and an increase in production related costs for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

~~Three Months~~Our ~~Ended~~depreciation, ~~December~~depletion 31and accretion increased by $50,450, or approximately 360%, to $64,481 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $14,031 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Substantially all of our increase pertained to the depreciation, depletion and ~~2009~~ accretion expenses incurred in our oil properties.

~~Our revenues~~General ~~increased~~and administrative expenses decreased $~~443~~739,~~743~~676, or approximately ~~1,318~~46%, to $~~477~~863,~~403~~252 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011, as compared to $331,~~660~~602,928 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010. ~~The~~This ~~increase~~decrease in ~~revenue~~our ingeneral ~~2010~~and ~~compared~~administrative toexpenses ~~2009~~during ~~was due~~the tocurrent ~~significant~~three ~~increase~~month inperiod ~~production~~is ~~due~~attributable to ~~new~~a ~~development~~decrease ~~and~~in ~~the reworking~~professional offees ~~our~~and ~~wells~~salaries.

Our ~~total operating~~loss ~~costs~~from ~~and~~operations ~~expenses~~decreased ~~increased~~from $~~675,602 or approximately 168%, to $~~1,~~077~~759,~~393~~390 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2010, ~~as compared~~ to $~~401~~838,~~791~~ 930 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2011. ~~The~~This ~~increase~~change in our ~~operating expenses~~loss ~~was~~from operations is primarily attributable to ~~adding~~an ~~new~~increase ~~employees,~~in ~~increases~~revenue ~~in production~~as ~~activities,~~well ~~and~~as ~~increases~~a decrease in ~~other~~ general and administrative ~~expenses~~ ~~for the three months ended December 31, 2010~~expenses.

~~Our depreciation,~~Interest ~~depletion~~expense ~~and accretion~~ increased byfrom $~~109~~304,~~983,~~346 ~~or approximately 1,528%, to $117,181~~ for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2010, ~~as compared~~ to $7625,~~198~~745 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2011. ~~Substantially all~~ Part of ~~our~~this increase ~~pertained~~is attributable to higher amounts of the ~~depreciation,~~Iroquois ~~depletion~~Notes ~~and~~Discount ~~accretion expenses~~being ~~incurred~~expensed inas ~~our~~on ~~oil~~a ~~properties~~quarter basis.

5The income related to the changes in value of warrant and derivative liabilities decreased from $3,905,386 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $2,652,154 on June 30, 2011. The change in value of warrant and derivative liability is attributable to fluctuations in the share price of Glen Rose common stock.

~~General and~~Our ~~administrative~~net ~~expenses~~income ~~increased~~decreased $~~293~~581,~~051,~~498 orfrom ~~approximately 140%, to~~ $~~501~~1,~~981~~850,369 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2010, ~~as compared~~ to $~~208~~1,~~930~~ 268,871 for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2011. ~~This increase in our general and administrative expenses during the current three month period is primarily attributable the addition of new employees, legal and other professional fees.~~

Our loss from operations increased from $368,131 for the three months ended December 31, 2009, to $599,990 for the three months ended December 31, 2010. This change in our loss from operations is primarily attributable to an increase in stock compensation expenses, professional fees and the other factors discussed above.

Interest expense increased from $43,630 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 to $366,766 for the three months ended December 31, 2010.

Our net loss increased $557,504 from $398,474 for the three months ended December 31, 2009, to $955,978 for the three months ended December 31, 2010.

Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Our revenues increased $649,839, or approximately 664%, to $747,640 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $97,801 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The increase in revenue in 2010 compared to 2009 was due to significant increase in production due to new development and the reworking of our wells.

Our total operating costs and expenses increased $2,304,296, or approximately 235%, to $3,284,280 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $979,984 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The increase in our operating expenses was primarily attributable to adding new employees, increases in production activities, and increases in other general and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2010.

Our depreciation, depletion and accretion increased by $167,918, or approximately 445%, to $205,692 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $37,774 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. Substantially all of our increase pertained to the depreciation, depletion and accretion expenses incurred in our oil properties.

General and administrative expenses increased $1,202,446, or approximately 200%, to $1,802,842 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $600,396 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. This increase in our general and administrative expenses during the current three month period is primarily attributable the addition of new employees, legal and other professional fees.

Our loss from operations increased from $882,183 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009, to $2,536,640 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010. This change in our loss from operations is primarily attributable to an increase in stock compensation expenses, professional fees and the other factors discussed above.

Interest expense increased from $109,395 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 to $1,067,274 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010. Interest expensed in 2010 included $135,043 that accrued on our debt due Iroquois and also included amortization of the discount on this debt totaling $157,792 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.

Our net loss increased $2,553,669 from $984,268 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009, to $3,537,937 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Our revenues have not been adequate to support our operations. We anticipate that this will change in the near future as a result of our capital raising and development efforts, combined with operating changes.

Current liabilities increased from $~~874~~6,~~001~~554,636 at March 31, ~~2010~~2011 to $16,~~309~~713,~~597~~966 at ~~December 31~~June 30, ~~2010~~2011, an increase of $~~435~~159,~~596~~330, or approximately 502%. Increases during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011 were mainly due to an increase in the ~~accrual of interest~~convertible notes payable of $~~271~~386,~~566~~433 from $1,190,092 at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2010~~2011 ~~compared~~ to $531,~~675~~576,525 ~~due~~at June 30, 2011, and an increase in accounts payable from $685,905 at March 31, ~~2010~~2011 to $1,062,081 at June 30, 2011, an increase of $376,177. The increase in accrued interest and accounts payable was offset by a decrease in the Derivatives Liability on the Convertible Note with Iroquois.

We had working capital deficit of $793,215 at December 31, 2010, as compared to working capital of $2,705,654 at March 31, 2010, a working capital decrease of $3,498,869 or approximately 129%. The decrease in our working capital resulted primarily from the cost outlaid to increase the overall operations and production of the Company.5

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

We had working capital deficit of $6,514,004 at June 30, 2011, as compared to working capital deficit of $5,527,253 at March 31, 2011, a working capital decrease of $986,751or approximately 18%. The decrease in our working capital resulted primarily from cost incurred and paid to increase the overall operations and production of the Company.

As of November 11, 2011 the Company held $11,693 in cash.

The Company intends to continue its planned capital expenditure to continue its reworking and drilling programs, but does not have sufficient realized revenues and cash on hand is not adequate to cover immediate cash needs. However, the Company expects revenues from production will be enough to cover operating expenses in the near term.

Although the Company obtained additional financing of approximately $1.9 million in July 2011 (see Note 9), which provided the needed funds for continued operations and drilling program in the short term, the Company can provide no assurance that it will be able to obtain sufficient additional financing that it needs to develop its properties and alleviate doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. If the Company is able to obtain sufficient additional financing proceeds, the Company cannot be certain that this additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, the Company’s stockholders may experience significant dilution. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that impact the Company’s ability to conduct business. Furthermore, certain of the Company’s current creditors may be required to approve any such transaction.

Cash Flow

Our operations used $1338,~~521,349~~587 of cash in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011. ~~This~~ isNet ~~primarily~~income ~~due~~for tothe aquarter ~~net loss~~ of $31,~~537~~268,~~937~~871, ~~net~~was offset by changes in value of ~~non-cash~~warrant ~~operating expenses~~liability and derivative liability totaling $2,~~016~~652,~~677~~154. ~~Cash~~ Stock compensation expenses of $1164,~~580~~400,~~718~~ ~~was~~amortization ~~used~~of inloan ~~investing activities~~discount ~~during~~of ~~the same nine month period~~$425,117 ~~which~~and ~~consisted~~an increase of $~~745~~376,~~830~~176 in ~~expenditures~~ ~~relating~~accounts topayable ~~the~~and ~~development~~accrued ofexpenses ~~our~~also ~~oil~~impacted ~~properties,~~the ~~and~~cash ~~$834,888~~used ~~was incurred~~ in ~~the~~operating ~~purchases~~activities. Cash of ~~related~~$508,638 ~~equipment. Cash~~was used in ~~our financing~~investing ~~activity~~activities during the ~~nine~~same ~~months~~three ~~ended~~month ~~December 31~~period, ~~2010~~most ~~included $12,466,~~of inwhich ~~payments~~was used on additions to ~~reduce~~the ~~our~~oil ~~capital~~and ~~lease~~gas ~~obligation~~properties. ~~and~~Cash from escrow of $55367,~~645~~554 ~~in principal~~was ~~debt~~the ~~reduction~~only onsource ~~our~~of ~~insurance~~cash provided by our financing ~~obligation~~activity during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

At ~~December~~ 31June 30, ~~2010~~2011, we had cash on hand and cash in escrow in the amount of $293,~~382~~907 as compared to $701,~~487~~878,088 at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2009~~2010.

Glen Rose will incur significant costs through its planned development program for its Wardlaw Field leases and related opportunities, cash flow permitting. The program will begin by reworking many of the existing well bores, as well as begin to drill new wells, which will be completed upon deploying the necessary funding. There can be no assurance of success, and unless production and sales of oil and gas significantly increase, we may not be able to attain profitability, or even be able to continue as a going concern. We will require additional funding to attempt to significantly increase our production and have been attempting to secure such funding.

Except as otherwise discussed in this quarterly report, we know of no trends, events or uncertainties that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material impact on our short-term or long-term liquidity or on our net sales or revenues from continuing operations. We do not currently have any significant commitments for capital expenditures for the next twelve months, but do have significant plans, depending upon success of the pilot flooding program and our success in attracting capital.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

Commodity Price Risk

Our major market risk exposure is in the pricing applicable to our oil production. Realized pricing is primarily driven by the prevailing price for crude oil. Pricing for oil has been volatile and unpredictable for several years, and we expect this volatility to continue in the future. The prices we receive for production depend on many factors outside of our control, such as the strength of the global economy. Currently the Company does not use any derivative instruments to hedge our exposure in the movement in oil prices.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The market price per barrel of oil decreased from $106.72 on March 31, 2011 to $95.42 on June 30, 2011.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~Glen~~Our ~~Rose carried~~chief ~~out~~executive anofficer ~~evaluation, under the supervision~~ and ~~with~~chief ~~the~~financial ~~participation~~officer ~~of management,~~evaluated of the effectiveness of ~~the~~our ~~design~~disclosure ~~and operation of the Company’s financial~~ controls and procedures ~~for~~as ~~the~~of ~~quarter~~June ~~ended December 31~~30, ~~2010~~2011. ~~This evaluation~~The ~~was~~term ~~undertaken~~"disclosure incontrols ~~consultation with internal~~ and ~~external accountants. Based on the evaluation~~procedures," ~~information~~as ~~about~~defined ~~which is included~~ in ~~the following~~Rules ~~paragraph, our then~~13a-~~Chief~~15(e) ~~Executive Officer~~ and ~~Chief~~15d-15(e) ~~Financial Officer~~under ~~concluded~~the ~~that~~Securities ~~our~~Exchange ~~internal~~Act, means controls and ~~reporting~~other procedures ~~were~~of ~~not effective~~a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by usa company in the reports that weit ~~filed~~files or ~~submitted~~submits under the Securities Exchange Act ofis ~~1934 was~~ recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in ~~compliance~~the ~~with~~SEC's ~~internal~~ rules and forms. Disclosure controls ~~ordinarily~~and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required ofto ~~publicly-traded~~be ~~firms~~disclosed by a company in the ~~manner~~reports ~~specified~~that in it files or submits under the Securities ~~and~~ Exchange ~~Commission’s~~Act ~~rules~~is accumulated and ~~forms.~~communicated ~~There~~to ~~have~~the ~~since~~company's ~~been material~~management, ~~changes~~including inits ~~internal~~principal ~~control~~executive ~~over~~and principal financial ~~reporting~~officers, ~~during~~as ~~current quarter~~appropriate ~~that~~to ~~are~~allow ~~reasonably~~timely ~~likely~~decisions toregarding ~~materially~~required ~~affect~~disclosure. ~~our~~Management ~~internal~~recognizes ~~control over~~that ~~financial~~any ~~reporting.~~controls ~~These~~and ~~controls/~~procedures, ~~include~~no ~~utilization~~matter ~~of internal~~how ~~accountant~~well todesigned ~~perform accounting~~ and ~~bookkeeping functions~~operated, ~~including bank~~can ~~reconciliations~~provide ~~and~~only ~~other~~reasonable ~~reviews~~assurance of ~~payables,~~achieving ~~receivables~~their objectives and ~~other assets;~~management ~~another~~necessarily ~~firm~~applies toits ~~review~~judgment ~~such~~in ~~work~~evaluating ~~and~~the ~~prepare~~cost ~~adjusting~~benefit ~~entries,~~relationship ~~and independent~~of ~~audit~~possible bycontrols aand ~~CPA firm~~procedures.

~~Glen~~Based ~~Rose Petroleum~~on ~~Corporation’s~~the ~~management~~evaluation isof ~~responsible~~our ~~for~~disclosure ~~establishing~~controls and ~~maintaining~~ ~~systems~~procedures as of ~~adequate~~June 30, 2011, and due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, ~~as such~~described ~~term~~previously isin ~~defined~~our inForm ~~Exchange~~10-K ~~Act~~for ~~Rules~~the ~~13(a)-15(f).~~year ~~Because~~ended ofMarch ~~its~~31, ~~inherent limitations~~2011, ~~internal~~and ~~control~~summarized ~~over~~below, our chief executive officer and ~~outside~~chief ~~independent~~financial ~~audit~~officer concluded that, as of ~~financial reporting~~such ~~may~~date, ~~not~~our ~~prevent~~disclosure orcontrols ~~detect~~and ~~misstatements~~procedures were not effective.

InWe identified the ~~year~~ ~~ending~~following ~~March~~material ~~31,~~weaknesses ~~2010,~~in ~~Glen~~internal ~~Rose~~control ~~Petroleum~~over ~~Corporation's~~financial ~~management~~reporting ~~team evaluated~~as ~~the~~of ~~effectiveness~~June ~~the~~30, ~~design~~2011. ~~and~~A ~~operation~~material ofweakness ~~the~~is ~~Company's~~a ~~financial controls~~deficiency, ~~and~~or ~~procedures~~a ~~and~~combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting ~~in accordance~~such ~~with~~that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the ~~standards~~annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the ~~Public~~Committee ~~Company~~of ~~Accounting Oversight~~Sponsoring ~~Board~~Organizations ~~("PCAOB")~~of the Treadway Commission in ~~the~~Internal ~~United~~Control—An ~~States~~Integrated Framework (September 1992).

~~In management's~~Complex ~~opinion,~~Equity ~~based on the assessment completed for the year ended March 31, 2010~~ and ~~the~~Debt ~~assessment for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the internal control over financial reporting was and continues to be operating effectively.~~Transactions

We had difficulties in applying complex accounting standards and did not have sufficient staffing and technical expertise in order to recognize and record complex equity and debt transactions. Adequate controls over these processes were absent as of June 30, 2011. During the audit of the March 31, 2011 financial statements it was noted that there were certain debt and equity transactions that were improperly recorded and were required to be restated and/or adjusted based on the audit findings. The absence of controls in this area resulted in the restatement of the March 31, 2010 Form 10-K and adjustments to fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 balances related to stock based compensation to consultants, classification of outstanding warrants, convertible debt and convertible equity which were not originally recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation, ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities and Equity.

Taxes

We did not have adequately designed controls to provide reasonable assurance that the accounting for income taxes and related disclosures were prepared in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Incomes Taxes. Specifically, we did not have sufficient staffing and technical expertise in the tax area to adequately prepare and review analysis and disclosures with respect to the complete and accurate recording of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Oil and Gas Accounting

We did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of ASC Topic 932, Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas. We had to rely on external resources to oversee the preparation and completion of the valuation for the proven and unproven properties and to complete the final adjustments related to changes in the proven properties, unproven properties, production expense, general and administrative expense, impairment expense and depletion expense and the related disclosures.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Entity Level Controls

We did not have adequately designed controls to provide reasonable assurance that executed agreements between us and third parties are being properly retained. Specifically, we could not locate certain executed common stock, warrant or consulting agreements. Additionally, certain executed board of directors’ minutes could not be provided.

Towards the end of the fiscal year and subsequent to March 31, 2011 we have begun to address these weaknesses. We hired one of our former directors to take on the role of Chief Financial Officer on March 18, 2011 and entered into an agreement with Point Capital Partners, LLC (Point Capital), pursuant to which it will take control of all accounting functions and administrative operations, including but not limited to daily, monthly and quarterly cash management, bill paying, receivables management, as well as the accounting and financial reporting of such items for us. Point Capital is in the process of performing a comprehensive review of the accounting procedures and policies and will update the processes and controls as necessary.

The Company believes that deficiencies and material weaknesses in our controls and procedures will be remediated before management undertakes its assessment of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2012.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

During the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2010~~2011, ~~there~~no changes were noidentified ~~changes~~with inrespect to our internal ~~controls~~ orcontrol inover ~~other~~financial ~~factors~~reporting that ~~could~~materially ~~significantly~~affected, ~~affect~~or ~~internal~~were ~~control over~~reasonably ~~financial~~likely ~~reporting subsequent~~ to ~~the~~materially ~~date~~affect, ofour ~~their~~internal ~~above evaluation~~control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

For a current report regarding ongoing legal proceedings involving the Company and other material claims, reference is made to Item 3 of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~July~~ 14October 17, ~~2010~~2011, which is incorporated herein, subject to the following:

Recon Petrotechnologies Oklahoma, Inc., v. UHC Petroleum Corporation and Glen Rose Petroleum Corp.

Trial has been scheduled for Spring 2011.

Forbes Energy Services, LLC successor in interest to CC Forbes Company, LP v. UHC Petroleum Corporation

Discovery has begun.

Langston Family Partnership and Buccaneer Energy Corporation v. Glen Rose Petroleum Corporation

The Company has filed a counterclaim in the matter.

Gonzalo v. Kayla Parks and Glen Rose Petroleum Corp.

On September 22, 2010, an action was commenced in the District Court in Edwards County, Texas. The matter appears to be based upon an automobile accident and it has been referred to the Company’s insurance carrier for defense.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

There were no reportable events under this Item 2 during the quarterly period ended ~~December~~ 31June 30, ~~2010~~2011.

Subsequent to the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) dated as of January 21, 2011 with accredited non-U.S. investors (the “Investors”) for the issuance and sale of an aggregate of 7,000 shares of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share (the “Shares”), for aggregate proceeds equal to $2.1 million from the sale (the “Sale”). ABG Sundal Collier Norge ASA (“ABG”) who acted as an advisor to the investors in connection with the Sale, was issued 280 shares of Preferred Stock in connection with the Sale. The Shares are convertible into 7,280,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, automatically upon the effectiveness of an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation increasing its authorized common stock to not less than 125 million shares. The terms of conversion, and other rights and privileges of the Preferred Stock are provided in the Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Designation”), filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on January 6, 2011.

In connection with the Sale, the Investors also were issued two series of warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 (the “Common Stock”). One series consists of two year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 7,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The second series consists of three year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 7,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.60 per share. The warrants do not permit cashless exercise and are closed to exercise for 6 months. ABG also received a two year warrant and three year warrant, each for the purchase of up to 280,000 shares of common stock.

The warrants do not permit cashless exercise and are closed to exercise for 6 months.

In connection with the Sale, Investors were granted “piggyback” registration rights with regard to the common stock and demand registration rights under certain limited circumstances.

The sale of the Shares and the Warrants was made pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act, and in reliance upon exemptions from registration under applicable state securities laws.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

~~Buccaneer Energy~~There ~~Corporation~~were no reportable events under this Item 3 during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011.

The Company is involved in a litigation with Buccaneer Energy Corporation with regard to its liability owed to Buccaneer as well as Buccaneers receivable owed the Company. The Company believes the amounts related to the notes payable and receivable recorded in its financials could be in default depending on the resolution of the dispute. The Company continues to record the principal balances of the note payable and note receivable as well as the interest accruals on both in its financials until this dispute is resolved between the parties.

Bowie Operating Company LLC

The Company is involved in a litigation with Bowie Operating Company LLC with regard to its liability owed. The Company believes the amounts related to the notes payable in its financials could be default depending on the resolution of the dispute. The Company continues to record the principal balances notes and receivables as well as the interest accruals until this dispute is resolved between the parties.

Convertible Promissory Notes

During the current quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company became aware of, and notified the holder of a majority-in-interest of the Company’s convertible promissory notes sold to Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund and other investors, of the existence of a default under the promissory notes by reason of the Company’s authorized common stock being only 20 million shares. This default was waived by the holder of a majority-in-interest in connection with the Company’s Regulation S offering described in Note 11 to our financial statements in this Report, subject to certain specified conditions in the waiver document filed as Exhibit 10.3, to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2011.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation filed in Delaware on May 22, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for period ending March 31, 2008 filed July 14, 2008.

3.3 Bylaws of Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for period ending March 31, 2008 filed July 14, 2008.

3.3(a) Amendment to By-Laws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3(a) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed ~~July22~~ July 22, 2010.

3.3(b) Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2011.

3.3(c) Amended and Restated Certificate of of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2011.

4.1 Secured Convertible Note (Iroquois) (see Exhibit 10.11).

4.2 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Iroquois Capital Opportunity Fund, LLC and other investors on March 3, 2010 (see Exhibit 10.13).

4.3 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to DK True Energy Development Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

4.4 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to RTP Secure Energy Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

4.4(a) Registration Rights Agreement for Warrant issued to RTP, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(a) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

4.5 Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrants issued to Joseph Tovey, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

4.5(a) Registration Rights Agreement for Warrant issued to Tovey, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5(a) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

4.6 Registration Rights Agreement, with the purchasers of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2011.

4.7 Form of Warrant issued to purchasers of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2011.

4.8 Form of Warrant issued to purchasers of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2011.

10.1 1995 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Form SB-2 Registration Statement filed May 4, 2004.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

10.2 1998 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.01 the Registrant’s Form S-8 registration statement filed on September 30, 1998 as document number 333-64711.

10.3 2000 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 of Registrant’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on December 6, 2000.

10.4 2008 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-1 to Registrant’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed May 30, 2008.

10.5 Amended Agreement with Joseph F. Langston, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Form 10-K filed July 13, 2009.

10.7 Debenture issued to Blackwood Ventures, LLC dated January 28, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed November 20, 2009.

10.8 Consulting Agreement with DK True Energy Development Ltd. and RTP Secure Energy Corp. dated November 27, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed December 3, 2007.

10.8a Termination of Consulting Agreement with DK True EnergyDevelopment Ltd. and Mutual Release, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8a to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.9 Consulting Agreement with Blackwood Capital, Ltd. dated January 15, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed January 22, 2008.

10.9(a) Amendment to Consulting Agreement with Blackwood Capital, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed November 20, 2009.

10.9(b) 8.5% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture and Warrant Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed November 20, 2009.

10.10 Subscription Agreement (Iroquois), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.11 Form of Secured Convertible Promissory Note (Iroquois), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.12 Security Agreement (Iroquois), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.12(a) Waiver of default, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2011.

10.13 Form of Warrant (Iroquois), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.14 Working Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement (Iroquois), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.15 Consulting Agreement with Blackwood Ventures, LLC dated January 28, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed November 20, 2009.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

10.16 Consulting Agreement with Iromad, LLC (Iroquois), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.17 Form of Option Holder Novation Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.18 Termination and Settlement Agreement with Joseph Tovey, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.19 Employment Agreement with Ruben Alba, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.20 Employment Agreement with Kenneth E. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.21(a) Agreement for short-term financing with Dr. Howard Berg, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(a) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.21(b) Senior Secured Note in the principal amount of $250,000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(b) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.21(c) Security Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(c) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

1110.21(d) Warrants issued to Dr. Howard Berg, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(d) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.21(d e) Registration Rights Agreement for Warrants issued to Dr. Howard Berg, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(de) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.21(e) Registration Rights Agreement for Warrants issued to Dr. Howard Berg, , incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21(e) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.22 Second Addendum to Amended and Restated Promissory Note made by World Link Partners, LLC in favor of Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.22(a) Third Addendum to Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated September 24, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.*22(a) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed February 22, 2011.

10.23 Management Consulting Services Agreement with Weisshorn Management Services, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.24 Employment Agreement with Sam Smith, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.25 Consulting Agreement with Compagnie de Ressources Naturelles et Dd’Investissment SA, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K, filed on July 14, 2010.

10.26(a) Adamson-Glen Rose Lease, June 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(a) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.26(b) Adamson-Memorandum of Lease to UHC Petroleum, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(b) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

10.26(c) Adamson Option, July 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26(c) to Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for period ending March 31, 2010 filed July 22, 2010.

10.27 Application Form for the purchase of the Company’s Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2011,

10.28 Engagement Letter, dated January 15, 2011, between the Company and Barry J. Pierce, CPA incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.*28 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed February 22, 2011.

10.29 Consulting Agreement, dated October 25, 2010, between the Company and James Casperson incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.*29 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed February 22, 2011.

10.30 Agreement with Point Capital Partners, LLC for bookkeeping, accounting and financial reporting services, dated March 28, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed April 11, 2011.

10.31 Application Form for the purchase of the Company’s common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 12, 2011.

14 Code of Ethics, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 30, 2004 filed June 29, 2004.

21 Subsidiaries of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for period ending March 31, 2008 filed July 14, 2008.

31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer*

31.2 Certification of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer*

32 .1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act*

32.2 Certification of Principal Accounting and Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act*

*Filed herewith.

1213

GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION~~	GLEN ROSE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Date: February __, 2011	By:	/s/ Andrew Taylor-Kimmins
Date: November 16, 2011	By:	/s/ Andrew Taylor-Kimmins
		Andrew Taylor-Kimmins
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February __, 2011	By:	/s/ Kenneth E. Martin
Date: November 16, 2011	By:	/s/ Theodore D. Williams
		Kenneth E. Martin
		Theodore D. Williams
		Chief Financial Officer

1314

Filing Compare · Glen Rose Petroleum CORP