United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10 - Q

(Mark One)

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2011

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ___________

Commission File Number: 0-28032

PATAPSCO BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		52-1951797
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1301 Merritt Boulevard, Dundalk, Maryland 21222-2194

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(410) 285-1010

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large Accelerated Filer ¨	Accelerated Filer ¨
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨	Smaller Reporting Company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~November~~February 1213, ~~2011~~2012, the issuer had 1,971,843 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE	~~PAGE~~
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)		3
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		5
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(Unaudited)		7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25	24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	34	32
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34	32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	36	33
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	36	33
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	36	33
Item 3.	Defaults in Senior Securities	36	33
Item 4.	~~Removed~~Mine ~~and~~Safety ~~Reserved~~Disclosures	36	33
Item 5.	Other Information	36	33
Item 6.	Exhibits	36	33
Signatures		37	34
Certifications			35

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(unaudited)

(in thousands except for share and per share data)

	September 30,			June 30,
	December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2011
Assets:
Cash on hand and due from banks	$	34,~~869~~131		$	3,631
Interest bearing deposits in other banks		1915,~~761~~364			24,838
Total cash and cash equivalents		2319,~~630~~495			28,469
Securities available for sale		3842,~~852~~331			39,814
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,095 and $4,194, respectively		180,511			182,570
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,919 and $4,194, respectively		179,418			182,570
Securities required by law, at cost		21,~~101~~823			2,286
Real estate acquired through foreclosure and other repossessed assets		12,~~936~~430			1,689
Property and equipment, net		3,~~528~~472			3,576
Intangible assets		~~129~~116			142
Accrued interest receivable		~~906~~701			857
Bank owned life insurance		2,~~310~~327			2,294
Other assets		2,~~121~~027			2,933
Total Assets	$	~~256~~254,~~024~~140		$	264,630
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	9,~~586~~816		$	10,494
Interest bearing deposits		~~216~~215,~~462~~188			220,812
Total deposits		~~226~~225,~~048~~004			231,306
Junior subordinated debentures		5,000			5,000
Long-term debt		9,000			12,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,~~391~~761			1,971
Total Liabilities		~~241~~240,~~439~~765			250,277
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock – Series A Cumulative perpetual; $0.01 par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; 6,000 shares issued and outstanding		5,849			5,833
Preferred stock – Series A Cumulative perpetual; $0.01 par value;
Warrant preferred stock – Series B Cumulative perpetual; $0.01 par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; 300 shares issued and outstanding		317			319
authorized 1,000,000 shares with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per
Common stock - $0.01 par value; authorized 4,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,971,843 shares and 1,939,593 shares, respectively		20			19
share; 6,000 shares issued and outstanding		5,868			5,833
Warrant preferred stock – Series B Cumulative perpetual; $0.01 par
value; authorized 1,000,000 shares with a liquidation preference of
$1,000 per share; 300 shares issued and outstanding		315			319
Common stock - $0.01 par value; authorized 4,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding 1,971,843 shares and
1,939,593 shares, respectively		20			19
Additional paid in capital		7,899			7,876
Retained earnings, substantially restricted		477			267
(Accumulated deficit)/Retained earnings, substantially restricted		(525	)		267
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes		23			39
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income, net of taxes		(202	)		39
Total Stockholders' Equity		1413,~~585~~375			14,353
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	~~256~~254,~~024~~140		$	264,630

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands except for per share data)	For Three Months Ended						For Six Months Ended
	September 30,
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest income:
Loans receivable, including fees	$	2,~~734~~566		$	32,~~083~~990		$	5,300		$	6,073
Investment securities		~~260~~236			~~206~~205			496			411
Federal funds sold and other investments		1311			1416			24			30
Total interest income		32,~~007~~813			3,~~303~~211			5,820			6,514
Interest expense:
Deposits		~~685~~634			~~949~~888			1,319			1,837
Long-term debt and junior subordinated debentures		~~187~~165			~~264~~217			352			481
Total interest expense		~~872~~799			1,~~213~~105			1,671			2,318
Net interest income		2,~~135~~014			2,~~090~~106			4,149			4,196
Provision for loan losses		~~323~~1,273			~~304~~994			1,596			1,298
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		~~1,812~~741			1,~~786~~112			2,553			2,898
Non-interest income:
Fees and service charges		~~157~~166			~~154~~176			323			330
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		73-			67-			73			67
Other		22			19
Loss on sale of other assets		-			(22	)		-			(22	)
Total non-interest income		252			240
Other		19			21			41			40
Non-interest expense:
Total non-interest income		185			175			437			415
Compensation and employee benefits		923			989
Non-interest expense:
Professional fees		208			139
Compensation and employee benefits		894			953			1,817			1,942
Federal deposit insurance assessments		94			137
Professional fees		261			157			469			296
Equipment expense		58			53
Federal deposit insurance assessments		86			133			180			270
Net occupancy expense		139			140
Equipment expense		53			56			111			109
Advertising		4			10
Net occupancy expense		133			133			272			273
Data processing		97			97
Advertising		5			10			9			20
Amortization of core deposit intangible		13			13
Data processing		103			93			200			190
Telephone, postage & delivery		71			66
Amortization of core deposit intangible		13			13			26			26
Provision for losses on and cost of real estate acquired through foreclosure		64			30
Telephone, postage & delivery		64			70			135			136
Other		168			183
Provision for losses on and cost of real estate acquired through foreclosure		91			56			155			86
Total non-interest expense		1,839			1,857
Other		209			192			377			375
Income before provision for income taxes		225			169
Total non-interest expense		1,912			1,866			3,751			3,723
Provision for income taxes		-			62
Loss before benefit from income taxes		(986	)		(579	)		(761	)		(410	)
Net income	$	225		$	107
Benefit from income taxes		-			(231	)		-			(169	)
Preferred stock dividends		97			97
Net loss	$	(986	)	$	(348	)	$	(761	)	$	(241	)
Net income available for common shareholders	$	128		$	10
Preferred stock dividends		97			97			194			194
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.07		$	0.01
Net loss avaliable to common shareholders	$	(1,083	)	$	(445	)	$	(955	)	$	(435	)
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.07		$	0.01
Basic loss per common share	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.22	)
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	-		$	-
Diluted loss per common share	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.22	)
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ~~INCOME~~ LOSS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	For Three Months Ended						For Six Months Ended
	September 30, .
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income	$	225		$	107
Net loss	$	(986	)	$	(348	)	$	(761	)	$	(241	)
Other comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive loss:
Reclassification adjustments for gains realized in income		~~(73~~-	)		~~(67~~-	)		(73	)		(67	)
Unrealized net holding gain/(loss) on securities available for sale		57			(32	)
Unrealized net holding loss on securities available for sale		(225	)		(267	)		(168	)		(300	)
Subtotal		~~209~~(1,211	)		8(615	)		(1,002	)		(608	)
Tax effect		-			39(105	)		-			(145	)
Comprehensive income	$	209		$	47
Comprehensive loss	$	(1,211	)	$	(510	)	$	(1,002	)	$	(463	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)	For the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended
	September 30,
	December 31,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	225		$	107
Net loss	$	(761	)	$	(241	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of premiums and discounts, net		72154			57124
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		(73	)		(67	)
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees, net of costs		5-			~~(26~~2	)
Provision for loan losses		~~323~~1,596			~~304~~1,298
(Gain) Loss on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		12			(4	)
Decrease in value of real estate acquired through foreclosure		167			-
Depreciation		64			68
Gain on sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		(12	)		(10	)
Amortization of core deposit intangible		13			13
Depreciation		127			137
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(16	)		(16	)
Amortization of core deposit intangible		26			26
Decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		812			957
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(33	)		(33	)
Non-cash compensation under stock-based benefit plan		5			1
Loss on sale of other assets		-			22
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(585	)		1,145
Decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,110			1,153
Net cash provided by operating activities		857			2,539
Non-cash compensation under stock-based benefit plan		5			3
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(214	)		258
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,092			2,672
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturity of securities available for sale and principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities		512,~~556~~782			1015,~~469~~989
Purchases of securities available for sale		(718,~~978~~982	)		(1029,~~650~~017	)
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		3,343			1,526
Loan principal repayments, net of disbursements		~~1,321~~551			432,937
Proceeds from sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure		~~151~~102			661,279
Net change in investments required by law		~~185~~463			~~164~~194
Purchases of property and equipment		(1623	)		(6270	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		2,562			1,556
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,764	)		(7,162	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase/(decrease) in deposits		(45,~~097~~366	)		19,~~708~~770
Decrease in advance payments by borrowers		(~~1,161~~936	)		(1,~~296~~082	)
Repayments on long-term borrowings		(3,000	)		-(5,100	)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities		(89,~~258~~302	)		~~412~~3,588
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(4,839	)		4,507
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(8,974	)		(902	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		28,469			28,043
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2319,~~630~~495		$	3227,~~550~~141
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds	$	~~938~~1,533		$	12,~~140~~238
Income taxes paid		-			-
Loans transferred to real estate acquired through foreclosure, net		~~410~~998			-265

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1: Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company" or “Patapsco Bancorp”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Patapsco Bank (the “Bank"), the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries Prime Business Leasing, PFSL Holding Corp. and Patapsco Financial Services, Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: The Patapsco Bank

The Bank, the primary operating unit of the Company, is regulated by The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the “Federal Reserve Bank") and The State of Maryland. The primary business of the Bank is to attract deposits from individual and corporate customers and to originate residential and commercial mortgage loans, consumer loans and commercial business loans. The Bank competes with other financial and mortgage institutions in attracting and retaining deposits and originating loans.

Note 3: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition at June 30, 2011, which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of the financial statements in conformity with Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). However, all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the interim consolidated financial statements have been included. Such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six months ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. For additional information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

Loans Receivable

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or ~~payoff~~pay off are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. The accrual of interest is generally discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Consumer loans are generally charged off after they become more than 90 days past due. All other loans are charged off when management concludes that they are uncollectible.

The Company accounts for loans in accordance with ASC 310, “Receivables,” when due to a deterioration in a borrower’s financial position, the Company grants concessions that would not otherwise be considered. Interest income is recognized on these loans using the accrual method of accounting, provided they are performing in accordance with their restructured terms and are considered collectible.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The allowance represents an amount that, in the judgment of management, will be adequate to absorb probable losses on outstanding loans and leases that may become uncollectible. The allowance represents an estimate made based upon two principles of accounting: (1) ASC Topic 450 “Contingencies”, that requires losses to be accrued when their occurrence is probable and estimable, and (2) ASC Topic 310, “Receivables,” that requires losses be accrued when it is probable that the lender will not collect all principal and interest due under the original terms of the loan. The adequacy of the allowance is determined through careful evaluation of the loan portfolio. This determination is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience and consideration of the current economic environment and other qualitative factors that may be subject to change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance and recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to it. The level of the allowance is adjusted through the provision for loan losses that is recorded as a current period expense. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments represents management’s estimate of ~~loses~~losses inherent in its unfunded loan commitments and is recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition.

The methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance includes a specific allowance, a formula allowance and a nonspecific allowance. The specific allowance is for risk rated credits on an individual basis. The formula allowance reflects historical losses by credit category. The nonspecific allowance captures losses whose impact on the portfolio have occurred but have yet to be recognized in either the specific allowance or the formula allowance. The factors used in determining the nonspecific allowance include trends in delinquencies, trends in volumes and terms of loans, the size of loans relative to the allowance, concentration of credits, the quality of the risk identification system and credit administration and local and national economic trends. These factors are applied to each segment of the loan portfolio and consider the characteristics contained thereof. In In response to comments received by our regulators during the most recent examination the Company has integrated the ~~general~~ nonspecific portion of the allowance for loan losses into each individual loan category. If circumstances differ materially from the assumptions used in determining the allowance, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be affected. Because events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that increases to the allowance will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. The change in methodology did not have a material impact on the allowance for loan losses.

Commercial Lending - The Company originates commercial loans primarily to businesses located in its primary market area and surrounding areas. These loans are used for various business purposes which include short-term loans, lines of credit to finance machinery and equipment purchases, inventory, and accounts receivable. Generally, the maximum term for loans extended on machinery and equipment is based on the projected useful life of such machinery and equipment. Most business lines of credit are written on demand and may be renewed annually.

Commercial loans are generally secured with short-tem assets. However, in many cases additional collateral such as real estate is provided as additional security for the loan. Loan-to-value maximum values have been established by the Company and are specific to the type of collateral. Collateral values may be determined using invoices, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging reports, collateral appraisals, collateral brokers price opinions (“BPO’s”), etc.

In underwriting commercial loans, an analysis of the borrower’s character, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral, as well as an evaluation of conditions affecting the borrower is performed. Analysis of the borrower’s past, present, and future cash flows is also an important aspect of the Company’s analysis.

Commercial loans generally present a higher level of risk than other types of loans due primarily to the effect of general economic conditions.

Commercial Real Estate Lending - The Company engages in commercial real estate lending in its primary market area and surrounding areas. The Company’s commercial real estate loan portfolio is secured primarily by commercial retail space, office buildings, and hotels. Generally, commercial real estate loans have terms that do not exceed 20 years, have loan-to-value ratios of up to 80% of the appraised value of the property, and are typically secured by personal guarantees of the borrowers.

In underwriting these loans, the Company performs a thorough analysis of the financial condition of the borrower, the borrower’s credit history, and the reliability and predictability of the cash flow generated by the property securing the loan. Appraisals on properties securing commercial real estate loans originated by the Company are performed by independent appraisers.

Commercial real estate loans generally present a higher level of risk than other types of loans due primarily to the effect of general economic conditions.

Commercial Real Estate Construction Lending - The Company engages in commercial real estate construction lending in its primary market area and surrounding areas. ~~The~~ The Company’s commercial real estate construction lending consists of commercial and residential site development loans as well as commercial building construction and residential housing construction loans.

The Company’s commercial real estate construction loans are generally secured with the subject property. Terms of construction loans depend on the specifics of the project, such as: estimated absorption rates, estimated time to complete, etc.

In underwriting commercial real estate construction loans, the Company performs a thorough analysis of the financial condition of the borrower, the borrower’s credit history, and the reliability and predictability of the cash flow generated by the project using feasibility studies, market data, etc. ~~Appraisals~~ Appraisals on properties securing commercial real estate loans originated by the Company are performed by independent appraisers.

Commercial real estate construction loans generally present a higher level of risk than other types of loans due primarily to the effect of general economic conditions.

Residential Lending - One-to-four family residential loan originations are generated by the Company’s marketing efforts, its present customers, walk-in customers, and referrals. These loans originate primarily within the Company’s market area or with customers primarily from the market area.

The Company offers fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans with terms up to a maximum of 30 years for both permanent structures and those under construction. The Company’s one-to-four-family residential originations are secured primarily by properties located in its primary market area and surrounding areas. The majority of the Company’s residential loans originate with a loan-to-value of 80% or less. Loans in excess of 80% are required to have private mortgage insurance.

In underwriting one-to-four family residential loans, the Company evaluates both the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments and the value of the property securing the loan. Properties securing residential loans made by the Company are appraised by independent fee appraisers. The Company generally requires borrowers to obtain an attorney’s title opinion or title insurance, as well as fire and property insurance (including flood insurance, if necessary) in an amount not less than the amount of the loan. The Company has not engaged in subprime residential originations.

Consumer Lending - The Company offers a variety of secured and unsecured consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit, home equity loans, and loans secured by savings deposits primarily within the Company’s market area or with customers primarily from the market area.

Home equity lines of credit are secured by the borrower’s primary residence with a maximum loan-to-value of 90% and a maximum term of 20 years.

In underwriting home equity lines of credit, a thorough analysis of the borrower’s willingness and financial ability to repay the loan as agreed is performed. The ability to repay is determined by the borrower’s employment history, current financial conditions, and credit background. The analysis is based primarily on the customer’s ability to repay and secondarily on the collateral or security.

Home equity lines of credit and consumer loans secured by savings deposits generally present a lower level of risk than other types of consumer loans because they are secured by the borrower’s primary residence or deposit accounts held at the Company, respectively.

A loan is determined to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A loan is not considered impaired during a period of insignificant delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including past-due interest. The Company generally considers a period of insignificant delay in payment to include delinquency up to and including 90 days. Impairment is measured through a comparison of the loan’s carrying amount to the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or at the loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans are evaluated collectively for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual residential first and second mortgage loans and consumer installment loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.

Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. Loans classified special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weakness may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristics that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass.

Impaired loans are therefore generally comprised of commercial mortgage, real estate development, and certain restructured residential loans. In addition, impaired loans are generally loans which management has placed in nonaccrual status since loans are placed in nonaccrual status on the earlier of the date that management determines that the collection of principal and/or interest is in doubt or the date that principal or interest is 90 days or more past-due. The evaluation of the need and amount of a specific allocation of the allowance and whether a loan can be removed from impairment status is made on a quarterly basis. The Company’s policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans does not differ from its overall policy for interest recognition.

In addition, federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.

Note 4: Subsequent Events

In accordance with ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” management has evaluated potential subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

Note 5: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2011-08 (Testing Goodwill for Impairment)

In September, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” The purpose of this ASU is to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment by adding a new first step to the preexisting goodwill impairment test under ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and other. ” This amendment gives the entity the option to first assess a variety of qualitative factors such as economic conditions, cash flows, and competition to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill has fallen below its carrying value. If the entity determines that it is not likely that the fair value has fallen below its carrying value, then the entity will not have to complete the original two-step test under Topic 350. The amendments in this ASU are effective for impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption ~~The~~of ~~Company~~this isguidance ~~evaluating~~will ~~the~~not ~~impact~~have ofa ~~this~~material ~~ASU~~impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial ~~statements~~condition or results of operations.

Accounting Standards Update 2011-05: Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Presentation of Comprehensive Income

The provisions of this Accounting Standards Update (ASU) amend ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” to facilitate the continued alignment of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) with International Accounting Standards. The ASU prohibits the presentation of the components of comprehensive income in the statement of stockholder’s equity. Reporting entities are allowed to present either: a statement of comprehensive income, which reports both net income and other comprehensive income; or separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. Under previous GAAP, all 3 presentations were acceptable. Regardless of the presentation selected, the reporting entity is required to present all reclassifications between other comprehensive and net income on the face of the new statement or statements.

The provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public entities. For nonpublic entities, the provisions are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and for interim and annual periods thereafter. As the two remaining options for presentation existed prior to the issuance of this ASU, early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In December, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update 2011-~~04:~~05.” ~~Fair~~In ~~Value~~response ~~Measurements~~to ~~(Topic~~stakeholder ~~820)~~concerns -regarding ~~Amendments~~the tooperational ~~Achieve~~ramifications of ~~Common~~the ~~Fair~~presentation ~~Value~~of ~~Measurement~~these reclassifications for current and ~~Disclosure~~previous ~~Requirements~~years, inthe UFASB has deferred the implementation date of this provision to allow time for further consideration.S. ~~GAAP~~The requirement in ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” for the presentation of a combined statement of comprehensive income or separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other ~~IFRSs~~comprehensive income is still effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public companies, and fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011 for nonpublic companies. Adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

~~This~~Accounting ~~ASU~~Standards ~~amends~~Update ~~ASC~~2011-04: ~~Topic 820, “~~Fair Value Measurements”, to(Topic ~~bring~~820) ~~U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements in line with International Accounting Standards. The ASU clarifies existing guidance for items such as: the application of the highest and best use concept to non~~-~~financial~~ ~~assets~~Amendments ~~and liabilities; the application of fair value measurement~~ to ~~financial~~Achieve ~~instruments~~Common ~~classified~~Fair inValue aMeasurement ~~reporting entity’s stockholder’s equity;~~ and ~~disclosure~~Disclosure ~~requirements~~Requirements ~~regarding quantitative information about unobservable inputs used~~ in ~~the fair value measurements of level 3 assets~~U. The ASU also creates an exception to Topic 820 for entities which carry financial instruments within a portfolio or group, under which the entity is now permitted to base the price used for fair valuation upon a price that would be received to sell the net asset position or transfer a net liability position in an orderly transactionS. ~~The~~GAAP ~~ASU also allows for the application of premiums~~ and discounts in a fair value measurement if the financial instrument is categorized in level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Lastly, the ASU contains new disclosure requirements regarding fair value amounts categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy such as: disclosure of the valuation process used; effects of and relationships between unobservable inputs; usage of nonfinancial assets for purposes other than their highest and best use when that is the basis of the disclosed fair value; and categorization by level of items disclosed at fair value, but not measured at fair value for financial statement purposes.IFRSs

~~For~~This ~~public~~ASU ~~entities~~amends ASC Topic 820, ~~this~~“Fair Value Measurements”, to bring U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements in line with International Accounting Standards. The ASU isclarifies ~~effective~~existing guidance for ~~interim~~items such as: the application of the highest and ~~annual~~best ~~periods~~use ~~beginning~~concept ~~after~~to ~~December~~non-financial ~~15,~~assets and ~~2011.~~liabilities; ~~For~~the ~~nonpublic~~application ~~entities,~~of fair value measurement to financial instruments classified in a reporting entity’s stockholder’s equity; and disclosure requirements regarding quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of level 3 assets. The ASU isalso ~~effective~~creates an exception to Topic 820 for ~~annual~~entities ~~periods~~which ~~beginning~~carry ~~after~~financial ~~December~~instruments 15within a portfolio or group, ~~2011.~~under ~~Early~~which ~~adoption~~the entity is ~~not~~now permitted~~. Adoption~~ ofto ~~this~~base ~~guidance~~the ~~will~~price ~~not~~used ~~have~~for fair valuation upon a ~~material~~price ~~impact~~that onwould be received to sell the ~~Company’s~~net ~~consolidated~~asset position or transfer a net liability position in an orderly transaction. The ASU also allows for the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement if the financial ~~condition~~instrument is categorized in level 2 or ~~results~~3 of ~~operations~~the fair value hierarchy. Lastly, the ASU contains new disclosure requirements regarding fair value amounts categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy such as: disclosure of the valuation process used; effects of and relationships between unobservable inputs; usage of nonfinancial assets for purposes other than their highest and best use when that is the basis of the disclosed fair value; and categorization by level of items disclosed at fair value, but not measured at fair value for financial statement purposes.

~~Accounting~~For ~~Standards~~public ~~Update~~entities, ~~2011-03:~~this ~~Transfers~~ASU is effective for interim and ~~Servicing~~annual ~~(Topic~~periods ~~860)~~beginning -after ~~Reconsideration~~December of15, ~~Effective~~2011. ~~Control~~For nonpublic entities, the ASU is effective for ~~Repurchase~~annual ~~Agreements~~periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. Adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

~~The~~Accounting ~~ASU~~Standards ~~was~~Update ~~issued~~2011-03: ~~to clarify the accounting principles applied to repurchase agreements, as set forth by FASB ASC Topic 860, “~~Transfers and Servicing.” ~~This~~(Topic ~~ASU,~~860) ~~entitled~~- “Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements,” amends one of three criteria used to determine whether or not a transfer of assets may be treated as a sale by the transferor. Under Topic 860, the transferor may not maintain effective control over the transferred assets in order to qualify as a sale. This ASU eliminates the criteria under which the transferor must retain collateral sufficient to repurchase or redeem the collateral on substantially agreed upon terms as a method of maintaining effective control.

~~This~~The ASU iswas ~~effective~~issued ~~for~~to ~~both~~clarify ~~public~~the ~~and~~accounting principles ~~nonpublic~~applied ~~entities~~to ~~for~~repurchase ~~interim~~agreements, ~~and~~as ~~annual~~set ~~reporting~~forth ~~periods~~by ~~beginning~~FASB onASC orTopic ~~after~~860, ~~December~~“Transfers 15and Servicing.” This ASU, entitled ~~2011~~“Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements,” ~~and~~amends ~~requires~~one ~~prospective~~of ~~application~~three criteria used to ~~transactions~~determine whether or ~~modifications~~not a transfer of ~~transactions~~assets ~~which~~may ~~occur~~be ontreated oras ~~after~~a ~~the~~sale ~~effective~~by ~~date~~the transferor. ~~Early~~Under ~~adoption~~Topic is860, the transferor may not ~~permitted. Adoption~~maintain effective ofcontrol ~~this~~over ~~guidance~~the ~~will~~transferred ~~not~~assets ~~have~~in order to qualify as a ~~material~~sale. ~~impact~~This onASU eliminates the ~~Company’s~~criteria ~~consolidated~~under ~~financial~~which ~~condition~~the transferor must retain collateral sufficient to repurchase or ~~results~~redeem the collateral on substantially agreed upon terms as a method of ~~operations~~maintaining effective control.

~~Note~~This ASU ~~6: Securities~~is ~~Available~~effective for ~~Sale~~both public and nonpublic entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and requires prospective application to transactions or modifications of transactions which occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. Adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

~~Securities available for sale are summarized as follows as of:~~11

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Corporate bonds	$	3,999	$	7	$	(226	)	$	3,780
U.S. Government agencies		10,513		4		(1	)		10,516
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		2,603		103		-			2,706
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		21,714		193		(57	)		21,850
	$	38,829	$	307	$	(284	)	$	38,852

Note 6: Securities Available for Sale

11Securities available for sale are summarized as follows as of:

June 30, 2011

December 31, 2011

Amortized

Unrealized

Fair

(In thousands)

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

Corporate bonds

34,~~000~~911

-5

(45352

)

24,~~955~~564

U.S. Government agencies

129,~~530~~001

109

~~(20~~-

)

129,~~520~~010

Mortgage-backed securities, residential

47,~~020~~580

78102

-(35

)

47,~~098~~647

Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies

2021,~~199~~041

~~107~~166

(6597

)

2021,~~241~~110

3942,~~749~~533

~~195~~282

(~~130~~484

)

3942,~~814~~331

The scheduled maturities of securities available for sale at September 30, 2011 are as follows:

	June 30, 2011
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(In thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Corporate bonds	$	3,000	$	-	$	(45	)	$	2,955
U.S. Government agencies		12,530		10		(20	)		12,520
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		4,020		78		-			4,098
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		20,199		107		(65	)		20,241
	$	39,749	$	195	$	(130	)	$	39,814

(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in less than one year	$	-	$	-
Due in one to five years		4,501		4,501
Due after five through ten years		3,503		3,284
Due after ten years		6,508		6,511
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		2,603		2,706
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		21,714		21,850
	$	38,829	$	38,852

The scheduled maturities of securities available for sale at December 31, 2011 are as follows:

The following table shows the Company’s securities available for sales’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at:

(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in less than one year	$	-	$	-
Due in one to five years		5,912		5,909
Due after five through ten years		3,000		2,658
Due after ten years		5,000		5,007
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		7,580		7,647
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		21,041		21,110
	$	42,533	$	42,331

	September 30, 2011
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Corporate bonds	$	915	$	(85	)	$	988	$	(141	)	$	1,903	$	(226	)
U.S. Government agencies		999		(1	)		-		-			999		(1	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		4,935		(26	)		1,211		(31	)		6,146		(57	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	6,849	$	(112	)	$	2,199	$	(172	)	$	9,048	$	(284	)

The following table shows the Company’s securities available for sales’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at:

	June 30, 2011
	December 31, 2011
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Corporate bonds	$	1,~~954~~858	$	(45148	)	$	-796	$	-(204	)	$	12,~~954~~654	$	(45352	)
U.S. Government agencies		4,480		(20	)		-		-			4,480		(20	)
Mortgage-backed securities		3,532		(35	)		-		-			3,532		(35	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		53,~~956~~694		(6543	)		-2,340		-(54	)		56,~~956~~034		(6597	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	129,~~390~~084	$	(~~130~~226	)	$	-3,136	$	-(258	)	$	12,~~390~~220	$	(~~130~~484	)

~~All mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations in the portfolio were comprised of securities issued by U.S. Government agencies.~~12

Securities, issued by agencies of the federal government, with a carrying value of $6.3 million and $5.7 million on September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, were pledged to secure the Company’s federal funds accommodation. Securities, issued by agencies of the federal government, with a carrying value of $15.1 million on September 30, 2011 were pledged to secure the Company’s borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve’s discount window.

	June 30, 2011
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

Corporate bonds	$	1,954	$	(45	)	$	-	$	-	$	1,954	$	(45	)
U.S. Government agencies		4,480		(20	)		-		-		4,480		(20	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		5,956		(65	)		-		-		5,956		(65	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	12,390	$	(130	)	$	-	$	-	$	12,390	$	(130	)

12All mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations in the portfolio were comprised of securities issued by U.S. Government agencies.

~~During~~At December 31, 2011, the ~~three~~Company ~~months~~had ~~ended~~fourteen securities ~~September~~in ~~30,~~an ~~2011~~unrealized ~~and~~loss ~~2010~~position. Unrealized losses detailed above relate to eight collateralized mortgage obligations, two $3mortgage-backed securities, one U.3S. ~~million~~Government Agency security, and $1three corporate bonds.5 ~~million~~The declines in ~~securities~~fair ~~were~~value ~~sold~~are considered attemporary aand ~~gross~~are ~~gain~~primarily ofdue ~~$73,000~~to ~~and~~interest ~~$67,000,~~rate ~~respectively~~fluctuations. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities, and ~~using~~it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the ~~specific~~securities ~~identification~~prior ~~method~~to their recovery. All of the individual unrealized losses are less than two percent of stockholders’ equity.

AtThe ~~September~~carrying amount of investment securities required by law, which includes Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stocks totals $1.8 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, and such securities are considered restricted as to marketability. Management evaluates the Company’s ~~had~~restricted ~~ten~~stock ~~securities~~for impairment in anaccordance ~~unrealized~~with ~~loss~~ASC ~~position. Unrealized~~Topic ~~losses~~350, ~~detailed~~“Accounting ~~above~~by ~~relate~~Certain Entities (Including With Trade Receivables) That Lend to ~~seven~~or ~~collateralized~~Finance ~~mortgage~~The ~~obligations,~~Activities ~~one~~of UOthers.S.” ~~Government~~Management’s ~~Agency~~determination ~~security,~~of whether ~~and~~this ~~two~~investment ~~corporate~~is ~~bonds~~impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The ~~declines~~determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in ~~fair~~net ~~value~~assets ~~are~~of ~~considered~~the ~~temporary~~issuer as compared to the capital stock amount for the issuer and ~~are~~the ~~primarily~~length ~~due~~of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the issuer to ~~interest~~make ~~rate~~payments ~~fluctuations. The~~required ~~Company~~by ~~does~~law or ~~not~~regulation ~~have~~and the ~~intent~~level of such payments in relation to ~~sell~~the ~~these~~operating ~~securities~~performance of the issuer, and it(3) isthe ~~more~~impact ~~likely~~of ~~than~~legislative and ~~not~~regulatory ~~that~~changes iton ~~will~~institutions ~~not~~and, beaccordingly, ~~required~~on tothe ~~sell~~customer base of the ~~securities~~issuer. ~~prior~~The toCompany ~~their~~has ~~recovery. None~~concluded ofthat the investment ~~individual~~securities ~~unrealized~~required ~~losses~~by law are ~~significant~~not impaired as of December 31, 2011.

~~The~~Securities, ~~carrying~~issued ~~amount~~by agencies of ~~investment~~the ~~securities required by law~~federal government, ~~which~~with ~~includes~~a ~~Federal~~carrying ~~Reserve~~value ~~Bank~~of ~~and Federal Home Loan Bank stocks totals~~ $24.15 million and $25.37 million aton ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, ~~and~~were ~~such securities are considered restricted as~~ pledged to ~~marketability. Management~~secure ~~evaluates~~ the Company’s ~~restricted~~federal ~~stock~~funds ~~for~~accommodation. ~~impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350~~Securities, ~~“Accounting~~issued by ~~Certain~~agencies ~~Entities (Including With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance The Activities~~ of ~~Others.” Management’s determination of whether this investment is impaired is based on their assessment of~~ the ~~ultimate~~federal ~~recoverability~~government, ofwith ~~their~~a ~~cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in~~ carrying value~~. The~~ ~~determination~~ of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the issuer as compared to the capital stock amount for the issuer and the length of time this situation has persisted, ($21.2) ~~commitments~~million by the issuer to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the issuer, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on ~~institutions~~December ~~and~~31, ~~accordingly,~~2011 onwere ~~the~~pledged ~~customer~~to ~~base~~secure of the ~~issuer. The~~ Company’s ~~has~~borrowing ~~concluded~~capacity ~~that~~at the ~~investment~~Federal ~~securities~~Reserve’s discount ~~required by law are not impaired as of September 30, 2011~~window.

~~Note~~During ~~7: Loans~~the three months ended December 31, 2011 and ~~Related~~2010, ~~Allowance~~there ~~for~~were ~~Loan~~no ~~Losses~~securities sold. During the six months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, $3.3 million and $1.5 million in securities were sold at a gross gain of $73,000 and $67,000, respectively, using the specific identification method.

The following tables summarize the activity by segment of the allowance for loan losses, segregated into the amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.13

				Commercial
(in thousands)	Commercial			Real Estate			Construction			Residential			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses
Beginning balance, July 1, 2011	$	1,512		$	1,835		$	368		$	114		$	365		$	4,194
Provisions		391			(93	)		(18	)		47			(4	)		323
Charge-offs		(241	)		(146	)		-			(19	)		(34	)		(440	)
Recoveries		4			-			-			-			14			18
Ending balance, September 30, 2011	$	1,666		$	1,596		$	350		$	142		$	341		$	4,095
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,016		$	581		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	1,597
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	650		$	1,015		$	350		$	142		$	341		$	2,498

Note 7: Loans and Related Allowance for Loan Losses

(in thousands)			Commercial
As of September 30, 2011	Commercial		Real Estate		Construction		Residential		Consumer		Total
Loan receivables:
Ending balance	$	52,440	$	51,060	$	11,680	$	57,138	$	12,288	$	184,606
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,273	$	4,533	$	1,798	$	143	$	-	$	9,747
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	49,167	$	46,527	$	9,882	$	56,995	$	12,288	$	174,859

The following tables summarize the activity by segment of the allowance for loan losses, segregated into the amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment for the three and six months ended December 31, 2011 and as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011.

				Commercial
(in thousands)	Commercial			Real Estate			Construction			Residential			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses
Beginning balance, October 1, 2011	$	1,666		$	1,596		$	350		$	142		$	341		$	4,095
Provisions		618			189			553			(37	)		(50	)		1,273
Charge-offs		(261	)		-			(171	)		-			(52	)		(484	)
Recoveries		19			-			-			-			16			35
Ending balance, December 31, 2011	$	2,042		$	1,785		$	732		$	105		$	255		$	4,919

Beginning balance, July 1, 2011	$	1,512		$	1,835		$	368		$	114		$	365		$	4,194
Provisions		1,009			96			535			10			(54	)		1,596
Charge-offs		(502	)		(146	)		(171	)		(19	)		(86	)		(924	)
Recoveries		23			-			-			-			30			53
Ending balance, December 31, 2011	$	2,042		$	1,785		$	732		$	105		$	255		$	4,919
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,360		$	847		$	319		$	-		$	-		$	2,526
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	682		$	938		$	413		$	105		$	255		$	2,393

(in thousands)

Commercial

As of June 30, 2011

Commercial

Real Estate

Construction

Residential

Consumer

Total

As of December 31, 2011

Commercial

Real Estate

Construction

Residential

Consumer

Total

Allowance for credit losses:

Loans receivable:

Ending balance

149,~~512~~851

150,~~835~~689

~~368~~11,834

~~114~~60,340

~~365~~11,623

4184,~~194~~337

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

~~924~~5,231

~~271~~4,706

-3,326

-101

113,~~195~~364

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

~~588~~44,620

145,~~564~~983

~~368~~8,508

~~114~~60,239

~~365~~11,623

2170,~~999~~973

(in thousands)

Commercial

As of June 30, 2011

Commercial

Real Estate

Construction

Residential

Consumer

Total

Loan receivables:

Allowance for credit losses:

Ending balance

531,~~422~~512

521,~~367~~835

~~12,281~~368

~~56,068~~114

~~12,626~~365

~~186~~4,~~764~~194

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

~~4,064~~924

~~3,786~~271

~~1,335~~-

~~615~~-

91,~~800~~195

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

~~49,358~~588

481,~~581~~564

~~10,946~~368

~~55,453~~114

~~12,626~~365

~~176~~2,~~964~~999

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s impaired loans by portfolio class as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011:

(in thousands)			Commercial
As of June 30, 2011	Commercial		Real Estate		Construction		Residential		Consumer		Total
Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	53,422	$	52,367	$	12,281	$	56,068	$	12,626	$	186,764
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,064	$	3,786	$	1,335	$	615	$	-	$	9,800
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	49,358	$	48,581	$	10,946	$	55,453	$	12,626	$	176,964

	September 30, 2011						June 30, 2011.
(in thousands)	Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related		Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related
	Investment		Balance.		Allowance		Investment		Balance.		Allowance
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	310	$	395	$	-	$	433	$	440	$	-
Commercial real estate		1,898		1,898		-		2,239		2,702		-
Construction		1,798		2,143		-		1,335		1,681		-
Residential		143		143		-		615		615		-
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	2,963	$	3,212	$	1,016	$	3,631	$	3,731	$	924
Commercial real estate		2,635		2,635		581		1,547		1,547		271
Total impaired loans:
Commercial	$	3,273	$	3,607	$	1,016	$	4,064	$	4,171	$	924
Commercial real estate		4,533		4,533		581		3,786		4,249		271
Construction		1,798		2,143		-		1,335		1,681		-
Residential		143		143		-		615		615		-

14The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s impaired loans by portfolio class as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011:

Average recorded investment of impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2011 are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2011						June 30, 2011
(in thousands)	Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related		Recorded		Unpaid Principal		Related
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Balance		Allowance
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	930	$	949	$	-	$	433	$	440	$	-
Commercial real estate		1,112		1,112		-		2,239		2,702		-
Construction		1,195		1,713		-		1,335		1,681		-
Residential		101		101		-		615		615		-

Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	4,301	$	4,766	$	1,360	$	3,631	$	3,731	$	924
Commercial real estate		3,594		3,594		847		1,547		1,547		271
Construction		2,131		2,131		319		-		-		-

Total impaired loans:
Commercial	$	5,231	$	5,715	$	1,360	$	4,064	$	4,171	$	924
Commercial real estate		4,706		4,706		847		3,786		4,249		271
Construction		3,326		3,844		319		1,335		1,681		-
Residential		101		101		-		615		615		-

(in thousands)	Average Recorded		Interest Income
	Investment		Recorded
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	372	$	-
Commercial real estate		2,069		-
Construction		1,567		-
Residential		379		-
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	3,297	$	-
Commercial real estate		2,091		-
Construction		-		-
Residential		-		-
Total impaired loans:
Commercial	$	3,669	$	-
Commercial real estate		4,160		-
Construction		1,567		-
Residential		379		-

Average recorded investment of impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the three and six months ended December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Management uses an eight point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first four categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. Risks Ratings One through Three are deemed “acceptable”. Four rated credits require a quarterly review, because potential weakness in some form may exist. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, may be on non-accrual, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. Loans greater than 90 days past due are considered Substandard. Loans in the Doubtful category are on non-accrual and have a definite loss of an undetermined amount. The portion of any loan that represents a specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses is placed in the Loss category.

	3 Months Ended December 31, 2011						6 Months Ended December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Average Recorded		Interest Income		Cash Basis Interest		Average Recorded		Interest Income		Cash Basis Interest
	Investment		Recorded		Income		Investment		Recorded		Income
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	620	$	13	$	13	$	557	$	18	$	18
Commercial real estate		2,590		6		6		3,197		16		16
Construction		1,496		1		1		1,443		1		1
Residential		122		-		-		286		-		-

Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	3,632	$	-	$	-	$	3,632	$	-	$	-
Commercial real estate		3,115		-		-		2,592		-		-
Construction		1,066		-		-		710		-		-
Residential		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total impaired loans:
Commercial	$	4,252	$	13	$	13	$	4,189	$	18	$	18
Commercial real estate		5,705		6		6		5,789		16		16
Construction		2,562		1		1		2,153		1		1
Residential		122		-		-		286		-		-

ToManagement ~~help~~uses ~~ensure~~an ~~that~~eight ~~risk~~point ~~ratings~~internal ~~are~~risk rating ~~accurate~~system ~~and~~to ~~reflect~~monitor the ~~present~~credit ~~and~~quality ~~future capacity~~ of ~~borrowers~~the tooverall ~~repay a~~ loan asportfolio. ~~agreed,~~The ~~the~~first ~~Company~~four ~~has~~categories aare ~~structured~~considered ~~loan~~not ~~rating~~criticized, and ~~process~~are ~~with~~aggregated ~~several~~as ~~layers~~“Pass” ~~of internal and external oversight~~rated. ~~Generally,~~ ~~consumer~~Risks ~~and~~Ratings ~~residential~~One ~~mortgage~~through ~~loans~~Three are ~~included~~deemed in“acceptable”. ~~the~~Four ~~Pass~~rated credits ~~categories~~require ~~unless~~ a ~~specific~~quarterly ~~action~~review, ~~such~~because aspotential aweakness ~~delinquency,~~in ~~bankruptcy,~~some ~~repossession~~form ormay ~~death~~exist. ~~occurs~~The tocriticized ~~raise~~rating ~~awareness~~categories ofutilized by amanagement ~~possible~~generally ~~credit~~follow ~~event. The~~bank ~~Company’s~~regulatory ~~Commercial~~definitions. ~~Loan~~The ~~Officers~~Special ~~are~~Mention ~~responsible~~category ~~for~~includes ~~timely~~assets ~~and~~that ~~accurate~~are ~~risk~~currently ~~rating~~protected but ofare ~~the~~potentially ~~loans~~weak, resulting in ~~their~~an ~~portfolios~~undue ~~at origination~~ and onunwarranted ancredit ~~ongoing basis. Commercial Business Loans~~risk, ~~Commercial~~but ~~Real~~not ~~Estate~~to ~~Loans,~~the ~~Construction~~point ~~Loans,~~of ~~Residential~~justifying ~~Mortgage~~a ~~Loans~~Substandard ~~and Consumer~~ classification. Loans ~~that~~in ~~are~~the ~~greater~~Substandard ~~than~~category 30have ~~days~~well-defined ~~past~~weaknesses ~~due~~that ~~are~~jeopardize ~~individually reviewed on a monthly basis and reported to~~ the ~~Board~~liquidation of ~~Directors. In~~the ~~addition~~debt, ~~all~~may ~~Commercial~~be ~~Business~~on non-accrual, and ~~Commercial~~have ~~Real~~a ~~Estate,~~distinct ~~Construction~~possibility ~~Loans,~~that ~~Residential~~some ~~and~~loss ~~Consumer~~will ~~Loans~~be ~~rated~~sustained ~~Four~~if ~~through~~the ~~Eight~~weaknesses are ~~evaluated~~not ~~with~~corrected. aLoans ~~detailed~~greater ~~review,~~than ~~including~~90 ~~plans~~days past ~~for~~due ~~resolution,~~are ~~and~~considered ~~presented to the Watch Committee quarterly~~Substandard. Loans in the ~~Special Mention, Substandard and~~ Doubtful ~~categories~~category are ~~evaluated~~on ~~for~~non-accrual ~~impairment~~ and ~~are~~have ~~given~~a ~~separate~~definite ~~consideration~~loss ~~in the determination~~ of ~~the~~an ~~allowance~~undetermined amount. The ~~Company~~portion ~~engages~~of anany ~~external consultant to conduct~~ loan ~~reviews~~that ~~every~~represents ~~twelve~~a tospecific ~~eighteen~~allocation ~~months. Generally,~~of the ~~external~~allowance ~~consultant~~for ~~randomly~~loan ~~reviews~~losses ~~relationships~~is ~~within~~placed in the ~~Commercial~~Loss ~~Business and Commercial Real Estate portfolios with an emphasis on loans over $500,000, concentrations, criticized assets, non-performing and Regulation O Loans~~category.

~~The~~To ~~following~~help ~~table~~ensure ~~sets~~that ~~forth~~risk ~~information~~ratings ~~with~~are ~~respect~~accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Company has a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as a delinquency, bankruptcy, repossession or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Company’s ~~credit~~Commercial ~~quality~~Loan ~~indicators~~Officers asare responsible for timely and accurate risk rating of ~~September~~the loans 30in their portfolios at origination and on an ongoing basis. Commercial Business Loans, ~~2011~~Commercial Real Estate Loans, Construction Loans, Residential Mortgage Loans and ~~June~~Consumer Loans that are greater than 30 days past due are individually reviewed on a monthly basis and reported to the Board of Directors. In addition, ~~2011~~all Commercial Business, Commercial Real Estate, Construction Loans, Residential and Consumer Loans rated Four through Eight are evaluated with a detailed review, including plans for resolution, and presented to the Watch Committee quarterly. Loans in the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful categories are evaluated for impairment and are given separate consideration in the determination of the allowance. The Company engages an external consultant to conduct loan reviews every twelve to eighteen months. Generally, the external consultant randomly reviews relationships within the Commercial Business and Commercial Real Estate portfolios with an emphasis on loans over $500,000, concentrations, criticized assets, non-performing and Regulation O Loans.

~~(in thousands)~~16

~~Commercial~~The ~~Credit~~following ~~Exposure~~table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011.

~~Credit~~(in ~~Risk Profile by~~thousands)

~~Internally~~Commercial ~~Assigned~~Credit ~~Grade~~ Exposure

	Commercial				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Residential
	September 30,		June 30,		September 30,		June 30,		September 30,		June 30,		September 30,		June 30,
	2011		2011		2011		2011		2011		2011		2011		2011
Pass	$	42,088	$	43,887	$	39,687	$	40,960	$	6,980	$	7,556	$	56,939	$	55,297
Special Mention		4,699		1,459		1,214		1,212		2,592		2,826		55		56
Substandard		4,725		7,031		8,716		9,067		2,108		1,899		144		715
Doubtful		928		1,045		1,443		1,128		-		-		-		-
Total	$	52,440	$	53,422	$	51,060	$	52,367	$	11,680	$	12,281	$	57,138	$	56,068

Credit Risk Profile by

~~Consumer~~Internally ~~Credit~~Assigned ~~Exposure~~Grade

Credit Risk Profile by

	Commercial				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Residential
	December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
	2011		2011		2011		2011		2011		2011		2011		2011
Pass	$	40,254	$	43,887	$	40,573	$	40,960	$	5,998	$	7,556	$	59,445	$	55,297
Special Mention		3,829		1,459		-		1,212		2,510		2,826		57		56
Substandard		4,402		7,031		7,592		9,067		3,007		1,899		838		715
Doubtful		1,366		1,045		2,524		1,128		319		-		-		-
Total	$	49,851	$	53,422	$	50,689	$	52,367	$	11,834	$	12,281	$	60,340	$	56,068

~~Internally~~Consumer ~~Assigned~~Credit ~~Grade~~Exposure

	Consumer
	September 30,		June 30,
	2011		2011
Performing	$	12,234	$	12,586
Nonperforming		54		40
Total	$	12,288	$	12,626

Credit Risk Profile by

16Internally Assigned Grade

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011:

	Consumer
	December 31,		June 30,
	2011		2011
Performing	$	11,598	$	12,586
Nonperforming		25		40
Total	$	11,623	$	12,626

	September 30, 2011
(in thousands)					Greater Than
	30-59		60-89		90 Days		Total				Non-
	Days		Days		and Still		Past				Accrual		Total
	Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Due		Current		Loans		Loans
Commercial	$	784	$	2,507	$	-	$	3,291	$	45,796	$	3,353	$	52,440
Commercial real estate		1,214		-				1,214		45,313		4,533		51,060
Construction		-		-		-		-		9,882		1,798		11,680
Residential		77		-		-		77		56,918		143		57,138
Consumer		142		161		-		303		11,930		55		12,288
Total	$	2,217	$	2,668	$	-	$	4,885	$	169,839	$	9,882	$	184,606

	June 30, 2011
(in thousands)					Greater Than
	30-59		60-89		90 Days		Total				Non-
	Days		Days		and Still		Past				Accrual		Total
	Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Due		Current		Loans		Loans
Commercial	$	648	$	2,048	$	-	$	2,696	$	46,556	$	4,170	$	53,422
Commercial real estate		337		-		-		337		48,244		3,786		52,367
Construction		-		-		-		-		10,946		1,335		12,281
Residential		363		56		-		419		55,034		615		56,068
Consumer		165		41		-		206		12,380		40		12,626
Total	$	1,513	$	2,145	$	-	$	3,658	$	173,160	$	9,946	$	186,764

The following table summarizes information relative to troubled debt restructurings by loan portfolio class:

	December 31, 2011
(in thousands)					Greater Than
	30-59		60-89		90 Days		Total				Non-
	Days		Days		and Still		Past				Accrual		Total
	Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Due		Current		Loans		Loans
Commercial	$	786	$	190	$	-	$	976	$	43,558	$	5,317	$	49,851
Commercial real estate		1,641		-				1,641		44,342		4,706		50,689
Construction		-		-		-		-		8,508		3,326		11,834
Residential		-		-		-		-		60,239		101		60,340
Consumer		62		35		-		97		11,501		25		11,623
Total	$	2,489	$	225	$	-	$	2,714	$	168,148	$	13,475	$	184,337

(in thousands)	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded
	June 30, 2011
	Investment		Investment
(in thousands)					Greater Than
September 30, 2011:
	30-59		60-89		90 Days		Total				Non-
Commercial	$	4,283	$	3,445
	Days		Days		and Still		Past				Accrual		Total
Commercial real estate	$	2,941	$	2,960
	Past Due		Past Due		Accruing		Due		Current		Loans		Loans
Construction	$	1,722	$	1,756
Commercial	$	648	$	2,048	$	-	$	2,696	$	46,556	$	4,170	$	53,422
Commercial real estate		337		-		-		337		48,244		3,786		52,367
Construction		-		-		-		-		10,946		1,335		12,281
Residential		363		56		-		419		55,034		615		56,068
Consumer		165		41		-		206		12,380		40		12,626
Total	$	1,513	$	2,145	$	-	$	3,658	$	173,160	$	9,946	$	186,764

AsThe offollowing ~~September~~table ~~30,~~summarizes ~~2011,~~information relative ~~charge-offs~~to ~~associated with~~ troubled debt ~~restructured~~restructurings ~~loans~~by ~~while~~loan ~~under~~portfolio a forbearance agreement totaled $250,000. As of September 30, 2011, there were no defaulted troubled debt restructures as all troubled debt restructured loans were current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. Three forbearance agreements were negotiated during fiscal year 2009, two were negotiated during fiscal year 2010 and modified during fiscal year 2011, while three were negotiated in fiscal year 2011, prior to June 30, 2011.class:

There are forbearance agreements on all loans currently classified as troubled debt restructures. The terms of these forbearance agreements vary whereby principal payments have been decreased, interest rates have been reduced, and/or the loan will be repaid as collateral is sold.

(in thousands)	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded
	Investment		Investment
December 31, 2011:
Commercial	$	2,681	$	2,654
Commercial real estate	$	1,208	$	1,206
Construction	$	1,722	$	1,760

As ~~a result~~ of ~~adopting~~December ~~the~~31, ~~amendments in Accounting Standards Update No.~~ 2011~~-02~~, ~~the~~there ~~Company~~was ~~reassessed~~a ~~all~~$1.2 ~~troubled~~million commercial ~~debt~~land ~~restructurings~~development ~~that~~loan ~~occurred~~and ona or$564,000 ~~after~~residential ~~the~~land ~~beginning~~development ofloan ~~the~~which ~~current~~respresented ~~fiscal~~defaulted ~~year of July 1, 2011, for identification as~~ troubled debt ~~restructurings~~restructures. ~~The~~ Three ~~Company~~forbearance ~~identified~~agreements nowere ~~loans~~negotiated ~~for~~during ~~which~~fiscal ~~the~~year ~~allowance~~2009, ~~for~~two ~~loan~~were ~~losses~~negotiated ~~had~~during ~~previously~~fiscal ~~been~~year ~~measured~~2010 ~~under~~and amodified during ~~general~~fiscal ~~allowance~~year of2011, ~~credit~~while ~~losses~~three ~~methodology~~were ~~that~~negotiated ~~are now considered troubled debt restructurings~~ in ~~accordance~~fiscal ~~with~~year ~~Account~~2011, ~~Standards~~prior ~~Updated~~to ~~No.~~June 30, 2011~~-02~~.

17During the first six months ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not restructure any loans. A commercial land development loan totaling $1.2 million that was restructured in the past twelve months defaulted in the current period. Restructured loans are subject to periodic credit reviews to determine the necessity and adequacy of a specific loan loss allowance based on the collectability of the recorded investment in the restructured loan.

~~Note~~There ~~8: Junior~~are ~~Subordinated~~forbearance ~~Debentures~~agreements on all loans currently classified as troubled debt restructures. The terms of these forbearance agreements vary whereby principal payments have been decreased, interest rates have been reduced, and/or the loan will be repaid as collateral is sold.

On October 31, 2005, Patapsco Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), a Connecticut statutory business trust and an unconsolidated wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $5 million of capital trust pass-through securities to investors. The interest rate is fixed for the first seven years at 6.465%. Thereafter, the interest rate adjusts on a quarterly basis at the rate of the three month LIBOR plus 1.48%. Patapsco Statutory Trust I purchased $5,155,000 of junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures from the Company. The debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures are the same as the terms of the capital securities. The Company has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of the Trust under the capital securities. The capital securities are redeemable by the Company on or after October 31, 2010, at par. The capital securities must be redeemed upon final maturity of the subordinated debentures on December 31, 2035.18

OnAs ~~May~~a 6,result ~~2010, the Company’s Board~~ of ~~Directors~~adopting ~~determined~~the toamendments ~~suspend~~in ~~interest~~Accounting Standards ~~payments~~Update onNo. 2011-02, the ~~trust~~Company ~~preferred~~reassessed ~~securities. The~~all ~~Company’s~~troubled ~~Board~~debt ofrestructurings ~~Directors~~that ~~took~~occurred ~~this~~on ~~action~~or inafter ~~consultation~~the ~~with~~beginning of the ~~Federal~~current ~~Reserve~~fiscal ~~Bank~~year of ~~Richmond~~July as1, ~~required~~2011, byfor ~~recent~~identification ~~regulatory~~as ~~policy~~troubled ~~guidance~~debt restructurings. The Company ~~currently~~identified ~~has~~no ~~sufficient~~loans ~~capital~~for which ~~and liquidity to pay~~ the ~~scheduled~~allowance ~~interest~~for ~~payments;~~loan ~~however,~~losses ~~the~~had ~~Company~~previously ~~believes~~been ~~this~~measured ~~decision~~under ~~will~~a ~~better~~general ~~support~~allowance ~~the capital position~~ of ~~The~~credit ~~Patapsco~~losses ~~Bank,~~methodology athat ~~wholly~~are now ~~owned~~considered ~~subsidiary~~troubled ofdebt ~~the~~restructurings ~~Company. At~~in ~~September~~accordance ~~30,~~with ~~2011,~~Account ~~cumulative~~Standards ~~unpaid~~Updated ~~interest totaled $490,000~~No. ~~This~~ ~~amount has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements~~2011-02.

Note 98: ~~Preferred~~ ~~Stock~~Junior Subordinated Debentures

On ~~December~~October 1931, ~~2008~~2005, asPatapsco ~~part~~Statutory ofTrust I (the ~~Troubled~~“Trust”), ~~Asset~~a ~~Relief~~Connecticut ~~Program’s~~statutory ~~(“TARP”)~~business ~~Capital~~trust ~~Purchase~~and ~~Program,~~an unconsolidated wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued ~~entered~~$5 ~~into~~million aof ~~Letter~~capital ~~Agreement,~~trust ~~and~~pass-through ~~the~~securities ~~related~~to ~~Securities~~investors. ~~Purchase~~The ~~Agreement~~interest –rate ~~Standard~~is ~~Terms~~fixed ~~(collectively,~~for the ~~“Purchase~~first ~~Agreement”),~~seven ~~with~~years at 6.465%. Thereafter, the ~~United~~interest ~~States~~rate ~~Department~~adjusts on a quarterly basis at the rate of the ~~Treasury~~three ~~(“Treasury”)~~month LIBOR plus 1.48%. Patapsco Statutory Trust I purchased $5,155,000 ~~pursuant~~of tojunior ~~which~~subordinated deferrable interest debentures from the Company. ~~issued~~The ~~(i)~~debentures ~~6,000~~are ~~shares~~the sole asset of ~~Fixed~~the ~~Rate~~Trust. ~~Cumulative~~The ~~Perpetual~~terms ~~Preferred~~of ~~Stock,~~the ~~Series~~junior A,subordinated ~~liquidation~~debentures ~~preference~~are the same as the terms of ~~$1,000~~the ~~per~~capital ~~share~~securities. ~~(“Series~~The ACompany has ~~preferred~~also ~~stock”),~~fully and ~~(ii)~~unconditionally aguaranteed ~~warrant~~the ~~for~~obligations of the ~~Treasury~~Trust tounder ~~purchase~~the ancapital ~~additional~~securities. ~~$300,000~~The incapital ~~preferred~~securities are ~~stock~~redeemable ~~(“Series~~by Bthe ~~preferred~~Company ~~stock”)~~on or after October 31, ~~for~~2010, anat ~~aggregate~~par. ~~purchase~~The ~~price~~capital securities must be redeemed upon final maturity of ~~$6.0~~the ~~million~~subordinated debentures on December 31, 2035.

~~The~~On ~~Series~~May ~~A preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum until February 15~~6, ~~2014. Beginning February 15~~2010, ~~2014,~~ the ~~dividend~~Company’s ~~rate~~Board ~~will~~of Directors ~~increase~~determined to 9%suspend ~~per~~interest ~~annum. Under~~payments ~~the~~on ~~original terms of~~ the ~~Purchase~~trust ~~Agreement, the Company is prohibited from redeeming the Series A~~ preferred ~~stock within the first three years unless it completed a qualified equity offering whereby it received aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $6~~securities.0 ~~million. However,~~The ~~the~~Company’s ~~provisions~~Board ~~introduced by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act~~ of ~~2009~~Directors ~~indicate~~took this ~~that~~action ~~once~~in ~~the Company notifies Treasury that it would like to redeem the Series A preferred stock, the Treasury must permit the Company to do so subject to~~ consultation with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond~~. The~~ ~~Company~~as ~~will~~required beby ~~subject~~recent toregulatory ~~existing~~policy ~~supervisory procedures for approving redemption requests for capital instruments~~guidance. ~~The~~ ~~Federal~~At ~~Reserve~~December ~~Bank~~31, ~~of Richmond will weigh the Company’s desire to redeem the Series A preferred stock against the contribution of Treasury capital to the Company’s overall soundness~~2011, cumulative ~~capital~~unpaid ~~adequacy~~interest ~~and~~totaled ~~ability to lend~~$572,000. ~~including~~This ~~confirming~~amount ~~that the Company~~ has abeen ~~comprehensive~~accrued ~~internal~~in ~~capital~~the ~~assessment~~consolidated ~~process~~financial statements.

OnNote December 19, 2008, Treasury exercised all of the warrants on the Series B preferred stock at the exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series B preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 9%: ~~per~~Preferred ~~annum. The Series B preferred stock may not be redeemed until all the Series A preferred stock has been redeemed.~~Stock

~~The~~On ~~Series~~December A19, ~~preferred~~2008, ~~stock~~as ~~and~~part ~~Series~~of Bthe ~~preferred~~Troubled Asset ~~stock~~Relief ~~were~~Program’s ~~issued~~(“TARP”) inCapital Purchase Program, the Company entered into a ~~transaction~~Letter ~~exempt~~Agreement, ~~from~~and ~~registration~~the related ~~pursuant~~Securities toPurchase ~~Section~~Agreement 4– Standard Terms (2collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”), ofwith the ~~Securities~~United States ~~Act~~Department of ~~1933~~the Treasury (“Treasury”), aspursuant ~~amended. Neither~~to which the Company issued (i) 6,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (“Series A preferred stock”), and ~~nor~~(ii) a warrant for the ~~Series~~Treasury Bto purchase an additional $300,000 in preferred stock ~~will~~(“Series beB ~~subject~~preferred tostock”), for ~~any~~an ~~contractual~~aggregate ~~restrictions~~purchase onprice ~~transfer~~of $6.0 million.

OnThe ~~May~~Series 6,A ~~2010,~~preferred ~~the~~stock ~~Company’s~~qualifies ~~Board~~as ofTier 1 ~~Directors~~capital ~~determined~~and topays ~~suspend~~cumulative ~~payment~~dividends at a rate of ~~regular~~5% ~~quarterly~~per ~~cash~~annum ~~dividends~~until onFebruary 15, 2014. Beginning February 15, 2014, the $6dividend rate will increase to 9% per annum.0 ~~million~~Under inthe ~~Series~~original Aterms ~~Preferred~~of ~~Stock~~the ~~and~~Purchase ~~$300~~Agreement,~~000~~ inthe Company is prohibited from redeeming the Series BA ~~Preferred~~preferred ~~Stock. The~~stock ~~Company’s~~within ~~Board~~the offirst ~~Directors~~three ~~took~~years ~~this~~unless ~~action~~it incompleted ~~consultation~~a ~~with~~qualified ~~the~~equity ~~Federal~~offering ~~Reserve~~whereby ~~Bank~~it ofreceived ~~Richmond~~aggregate gross asproceeds ~~required~~of bynot ~~recent~~less ~~regulatory~~than ~~policy~~$6.0 ~~guidance~~million. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~However, ~~currently~~the ~~has~~provisions ~~sufficient~~introduced ~~capital~~by the American Recovery and ~~liquidity~~Reinvestment toAct of ~~pay~~2009 indicate that once the ~~scheduled~~Company ~~dividends~~notifies onTreasury that it would like to redeem the Series A preferred stock~~; however~~, the Treasury must permit the Company ~~believes~~to ~~this~~do ~~decision~~so ~~will~~subject ~~better~~to ~~support~~consultation with the ~~capital~~Federal ~~position~~Reserve Bank of Richmond. The ~~Patapsco~~Company will be subject to existing supervisory procedures for approving redemption requests for capital instruments. The Federal Reserve Bank, of aRichmond will ~~wholly~~weigh ~~owned~~the ~~subsidiary~~Company’s desire to redeem the Series A preferred stock against the contribution of Treasury capital to the Company~~. At~~’s ~~September,~~overall ~~2011~~soundness, ~~cumulative~~capital ~~unpaid~~adequacy ~~dividends~~and ~~totaled~~ability ~~$491~~to lend,~~000. This~~ ~~amount~~including ~~has~~confirming ~~not~~that ~~been~~the ~~accrued~~Company inhas a ~~the~~comprehensive ~~consolidated~~internal ~~financial~~capital ~~statements~~assessment process.

18On December 19, 2008, Treasury exercised all of the warrants on the Series B preferred stock at the exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series B preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 9% per annum. The Series B preferred stock may not be redeemed until all the Series A preferred stock has been redeemed.

~~Note~~The ~~10: Regulatory~~Series ~~Capital~~A ~~Requirements~~preferred stock and Series B preferred stock were issued in a transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Neither the Series A preferred stock nor the Series B preferred stock will be subject to any contractual restrictions on transfer.

AtOn ~~September~~May 306, ~~2011~~2010, the ~~Bank~~Company’s ~~met~~Board ~~each~~of Directors determined to suspend payment of ~~the~~regular ~~three~~quarterly ~~minimum~~cash ~~regulatory~~dividends ~~capital~~on ~~requirements~~the $6. ~~The~~0 ~~holding~~million ~~company~~in ~~ratios~~Series doA ~~not~~Preferred ~~differ~~Stock ~~significantly~~and $300,000 ~~from~~in ~~the~~Series ~~Bank’s~~B ~~ratios~~Preferred Stock. The ~~following~~Company’s ~~table~~Board ~~summarizes~~of Directors took this action in consultation with the Federal Reserve Bank’s of Richmond as required by recent regulatory ~~capital~~policy ~~position~~guidance. atAt ~~September~~December 3031, 2011, cumulative unpaid dividends totaled $572,000. This amount has not been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

											Well Capitalized Under
						For Capital					Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provision
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	21,724		13.28	%	$	13,084		8.00	%	$	16,355		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	19,654		12.02	%	$	6,542		4.00	%	$	9,813		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	19,654		7.55	%	$	10,406		4.00	%	$	13,008		5.00	%

~~The~~Note ~~following~~10: ~~table~~Regulatory ~~summarizes~~Capital ~~the Bank’s regulatory capital position at June 30, 2011.~~Requirements

											Well Capitalized Under
						For Capital					Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provision
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	21,432		12.94	%	$	13,250		8.00	%	$	16,563		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	19,335		11.67	%	$	6,625		4.00	%	$	9,938		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	19,335		7.26	%	$	10,659		4.00	%	$	13,323		5.00	%

At December 31, 2011, the Bank met each of the three minimum regulatory capital requirements. The holding company ratios do not differ significantly from the Bank’s ratios. The following table summarizes the Bank’s regulatory capital position at December 31, 2011.

Note 11: Earnings Per Share

											Well Capitalized Under
						For Capital					Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provision
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	20,817		12.89	%	$	12,917		8.00	%	$	16,146		10.00	%

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	18,763		11.62	%	$	6,458		4.00	%	$	9,688		6.00	%

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	18,763		7.34	%	$	10,222		4.00	%	$	12,778		5.00	%

The following table ~~presents~~summarizes athe ~~summary~~Bank’s regulatory ofcapital ~~per~~position ~~share~~at ~~data~~June ~~and~~30, ~~amounts for the periods indicated~~2011.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
											Well Capitalized Under
	2011		2010
						For Capital					Prompt Corrective
(in thousands except for per share data)
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provision
Net income available for common shareholders	$	128	$	10
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		1,979		1,941
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	21,432		12.94	%	$	13,250		8.00	%	$	16,563		10.00	%
Basic earnings per share	$	0.07	$	0.01
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	19,335		11.67	%	$	6,625		4.00	%	$	9,938		6.00	%
Dilutive shares		-		-
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	19,335		7.26	%	$	10,659		4.00	%	$	13,323		5.00	%
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		1,979		1,941
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.07	$	0.01

AtNote ~~September~~11: ~~30,~~Loss ~~2011,~~per ~~there were 20,832 stock options outstanding all of which had exercise prices above the market price of the Company’s common stock on the same date.~~Share

19The following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.

Note 12: Guarantees

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(in thousands except for per share data)

Net loss available for common shareholders	$	(1,083	)	$	(445	)	$	(955	)	$	(435	)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		1,981			1,941			1,980			1,941
Basic loss per share	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.22	)
Dilutive shares		-			-			-			-
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		1,981			1,941			1,980			1,941
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.55	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.22	)

~~The~~At ~~Company~~December ~~does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure~~31, other than its standby letters of credit issued by the Company. Standby letters of credit are conditional written commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit when issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company, generally, holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Company had $1,421,000 of standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2011 ~~and $1~~,~~421,000~~ ~~outstanding~~there aswere ofno ~~June~~stock ~~30, 2011~~options outstanding. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payment required under the corresponding guarantees. The amount of the liability as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

~~Note 13: Core Deposit Intangible Asset~~20

~~ASC~~Note ~~Topic~~12: 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” requires that other acquired intangible assets with finite lives, such as purchased customer accounts, be amortized over their estimated lives. Other intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 years. The Company periodically assesses whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of other intangible assets may be impaired.Guarantees

~~Note~~The ~~14:~~Company ~~Share-Based~~does ~~Compensation~~not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit issued by the Company. Standby letters of credit are conditional written commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit when issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company, generally, holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Company had $1,288,000 of standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2011 and $1,421,000 outstanding as of June 30, 2011. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payment required under the corresponding guarantees. The amount of the liability as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

~~Stock~~Note ~~Options~~13: Core Deposit Intangible Asset

~~The~~ASC ~~Company's~~Topic ~~1996~~350, ~~Stock~~“Intangibles ~~Options~~- Goodwill and ~~Incentive~~Other” ~~Plan~~requires ~~(Plan)~~that ~~was~~other ~~approved~~acquired byintangible ~~the~~assets ~~stockholders~~with atfinite ~~the~~lives, ~~1996~~such ~~annual~~as ~~meeting. The~~purchased ~~Plan~~customer ~~provides~~accounts, ~~for~~be ~~the~~amortized over ~~granting~~their ofestimated ~~options~~lives. toOther ~~acquire~~intangible ~~common~~assets ~~stock to directors and key employees. Option prices~~ are ~~equal~~amortized orusing ~~greater than~~ the ~~estimated~~straight-line ~~fair~~method ~~market~~over ~~value~~estimated ofuseful ~~the~~lives ~~common stock at the date~~ of 10 ~~the grant~~years. In ~~October~~The ~~1996,~~Company ~~the~~periodically ~~Company~~assesses ~~granted~~whether ~~options~~events toor ~~purchase~~changes ~~137,862~~in ~~shares~~circumstances atindicate ~~$4.60~~that ~~per~~the ~~share. There~~carrying ~~are~~amounts noof ~~remaining~~other intangible ~~options~~assets tomay be ~~issued under this Plan~~impaired.

~~The~~Note ~~Company’s~~14: ~~2000~~Share-Based Stock Option and Incentive Plan was approved by the stockholders at the 2000 annual meeting. The Plan provides for the granting of options to acquire common stock to directors and key employees. Option prices are equal or greater than the estimated fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant.Compensation

~~The~~Stock Plan provides for one-fifth of the options granted to be exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant. Under this Plan, in August 2001 the Company granted options to purchase 99,975 shares at $6.29 per share. There are 8,971 options eligible to be issued under this plan.Options

AThe ~~summary~~Company's of1996 ~~share~~Stock ~~option~~Options ~~activity~~and Incentive Plan (Plan) was approved by the stockholders at the 1996 annual meeting. The Plan provides for the ~~three~~granting ~~month~~of ~~period~~options ~~ended~~to ~~September~~acquire common 30stock to directors and key employees. Option prices are equal or greater than the estimated fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant. In October 1996, ~~2011~~the ~~follows:~~Company granted options to purchase 137,862 shares at $4.60 per share. There are no remaining options to be issued under this Plan.

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term in Months		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s)
Outstanding at June 30, 2011		20,832	$	6.29		1.11	$	-
Granted		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-
Forfeited or expired		20,832	$	6.29		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2011		-		-		-	$	-
Exercisable at September 30, 2011		-		-

The Company’s 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan was approved by the stockholders at the 2000 annual meeting. The Plan provides for the granting of options to acquire common stock to directors and key employees. Option prices are equal or greater than the estimated fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant.

~~Stock~~The ~~Incentive~~Plan provides for one-fifth of the options granted to be exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant. Under this Plan, in August 2001 the Company granted options to purchase 99,975 shares at $6.29 per share. There are 8,971 options eligible to be issued under this plan.

InA summary ~~October 2004, the shareholders~~ of ~~the Company approved the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this Plan, 90,000 shares of common~~ stock ~~are~~option ~~available~~activity for ~~issuance under a variety of awards. An additional 40,146 shares were made available for issuance to settle past deferred compensation obligations. This newer Plan replaced~~ the ~~Director’s~~six ~~retirement~~month ~~plan~~period ~~that~~ended ~~became~~December ~~effective in September 1995. At the time of adoption~~31, 2011 ~~the directors had the option to reallocate their deferred compensation assets.~~follows:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term in Months		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s)
Outstanding at June 30, 2011		20,832	$	6.29		1.11	$	-
Granted		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-
Forfeited or expired		20,832	$	6.29		-	$	-
Outstanding at December 31, 2011		-		-		-
Exercisable at December 31, 2011		-		-

In May 2009, the Board of Directors voted to terminate the directors deferred compensation portion of the Plan. Accordingly, 57,255 deferred shares were distributed to the respective directors in May 2010, and are now included as issued shares. The remaining portion of the Plan continues to remain in effect. As of September 30, 2011 there are 10,000 non-vested shares outstanding under this Plan.21

AStock ~~summary~~Incentive ~~of the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as of September 30, 2011 is presented below:~~Plan

	Common Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of June 30, 2011		2,250	$	7.10
Awards Granted		10,000		0.84
Vested		2,250		7.10
Forfeited		-		-
Non-vested at September 30, 2011		10,000	$	0.84

In October 2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this Plan, 90,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance under a variety of awards. An additional 40,146 shares were made available for issuance to settle past deferred compensation obligations. This newer Plan replaced the Director’s retirement plan that became effective in September 1995. At the time of adoption, the directors had the option to reallocate their deferred compensation assets.

AsIn ofMay ~~September 30~~2009, ~~2011~~the ~~there~~Board ~~was $7,000~~ of ~~total~~Directors ~~unrecognized~~voted ~~compensation costs related~~ to terminate ~~non-vested~~the ~~share-based~~directors deferred compensation~~. The~~ ~~cost~~portion ~~is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period~~ of 32the ~~months~~Plan. At ~~grant~~Accordingly, ~~date~~57,255 ~~vesting~~deferred ~~of the~~ shares ~~was~~were ~~“cliff”~~distributed ~~vesting~~to at the respective ~~end~~directors ofin ~~either~~May a2010, ~~two~~and orare ~~three~~now ~~year~~included ~~period~~as issued shares. ~~Compensation~~ ~~expense~~The ~~totaling~~remaining ~~$1,000~~portion ~~has~~of ~~been~~the ~~recognized~~Plan incontinues ~~the~~to ~~three~~remain in ~~month~~effect. ~~periods~~As ~~ended~~of ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 ~~and~~there ~~2010,~~are ~~respectively~~10,000 asnon-vested ashares ~~result~~outstanding ofunder ~~these~~this ~~awards~~Plan.

~~Note~~A ~~15: Fair~~summary ~~Value~~of ~~Measurements~~the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as of December 31, 2011 is presented below:

ASC Topic 825 “Financial Instruments” requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for certain on- and off- balance sheet financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.

	Common Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Non-vested as of June 30, 2011		2,250	$	7.10

Awards Granted		10,000		0.84
Vested		2,250		7.10
Forfeited		-		-
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		10,000	$	0.84

~~Fair~~As ~~value~~of ~~estimates~~December ~~are~~31, ~~made~~2011 atthere awas $7,000 ~~specific~~of ~~point~~total inunrecognized ~~time,~~compensation costs related to non-vested share-based oncompensation. ~~relevant~~The ~~market~~cost ~~information~~is ~~and~~expected ~~information~~to be ~~about~~recognized ~~financial~~over ~~instruments~~a weighted average period of 29 months. ~~These~~ ~~estimates~~During dothe ~~not~~six ~~reflect~~months ~~any~~ended ~~premium~~December or31, ~~discount~~2012 ~~that~~10,000 restricted ~~could~~shares ~~result~~were ~~from~~issued ~~offering~~to ~~for~~members ~~sale~~of atexecutive ~~one~~management. ~~time~~At grant date, vesting of the ~~Company's~~shares ~~entire~~was “cliff” ~~holdings~~vesting at the end of a ~~particular~~three ~~financial~~year ~~instrument~~period. ~~Because~~ noCompensation ~~market~~expense ~~exists~~totaling ~~for~~$1,000 has been recognized in the three month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a result of these awards. Compensation expense totaling $1,000 and $3,000 has been recognized in the six month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a result of these awards.

aNote ~~significant~~15: ~~portion~~Fair ofValue the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect estimates.Measurements

~~The~~ASC ~~carrying~~Topic ~~amount~~825 ~~and~~“Financial Instruments” requires the Company to disclose estimated fair ~~value~~values offor certain on- and off- balance sheet financial instruments. isFair ~~summarized~~value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments as ~~follows~~of ~~at:~~December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011.

	September 30, 2011				June 30, 2011
	Carrying				Carrying
(In thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,630	$	23,630	$	28,469	$	28,469
Securities available for sale		38,852		38,852		39,814		39,814
Loans receivable, net		180,511		198,041		182,570		191,181
Securities required by law		2,101		2,101		2,286		2,286
Accrued interest receivable		906		906		857		857
Liabilities:
Deposits		226,048		226,421		231,306		231,358
Long-term debt		14,000		13,570		17,000		15,828
Accrued interest payable		556		556		622		622
Off balance sheet instruments:
Commitments to extend credit		-		-		-		-

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect estimates.

~~Cash~~The ~~and~~carrying ~~Cash~~amount ~~Equivalents~~and -estimated ~~Due~~fair ~~from~~value of ~~Banks,~~financial ~~Interest~~instruments ~~Bearings~~is ~~Deposits~~summarized ~~with~~as ~~Banks~~follows ~~and Federal Funds Sold~~at:

The statement of financial condition carrying amounts for cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold approximate the estimated fair values of such assets.

	December 31, 2011				June 30, 2011
	Carrying				Carrying
(In thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,495	$	19,495	$	28,469	$	28,469
Securities available for sale		42,331		42,331		39,814		39,814
Loans receivable, net		179,418		191,485		182,570		191,181
Securities required by law		1,823		1,823		2,286		2,286
Accrued interest receivable		701		701		857		857
Liabilities:
Deposits		225,004		225,784		231,306		231,358
Long-term debt		14,000		13,632		17,000		15,828
Accrued interest payable		760		760		622		622
Off balance sheet instruments:
Commitments to extend credit		-		-		-		-

~~Securities Available for Sale~~22

~~The~~Cash ~~fair~~and ~~value~~Cash ofEquivalents ~~securities~~- ~~available~~Due ~~for sale (carried at fair value) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1)~~from Banks, orInterest ~~matrix~~Bearings ~~pricing~~Deposits ~~(Level~~with ~~2),~~Banks ~~which~~and isFederal aFunds mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.Sold

21The statement of financial condition carrying amounts for cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold approximate the estimated fair values of such assets.

~~Loans~~Securities ~~Receivable~~Available for Sale

~~Loans~~The ~~receivable~~fair ~~were~~value ~~segmented~~of ~~into~~securities ~~portfolios~~available ~~with~~for sale ~~similar~~(carried ~~financial~~at ~~characteristics. Loans~~fair ~~were~~value) ~~also~~are ~~segmented~~determined by ~~type~~obtaining ~~such~~quoted asmarket ~~commercial,~~prices ~~commercial~~on ~~real~~nationally ~~estate~~recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), ~~construction~~or matrix pricing (Level 2), ~~residential~~which ~~and~~is ~~consumer. The~~a ~~fair~~mathematical ~~value~~technique ofused ~~loans~~widely ~~was~~in ~~calculated~~the byindustry ~~discounting~~to ~~anticipated~~value ~~cash~~debt ~~flows~~securities ~~based~~without relying exclusively on ~~weighted~~quoted ~~average~~market ~~contractual~~prices ~~maturity,~~for ~~weighted~~the ~~average~~specific ~~coupon~~securities ~~and~~but ~~market~~rather ~~rates~~by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

~~Impaired~~ Loans Receivable

~~The~~Loans ~~Company~~receivable ~~considers~~were ~~loans~~segmented tointo ~~be impaired when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance~~ portfolios with ~~the~~similar ~~contractual~~financial ~~terms of the loan agreement~~characteristics. ~~All~~ ~~non-accrual~~Loans ~~loans~~were ~~are~~also ~~considered~~segmented ~~impaired. The~~by ~~measurement~~type ofsuch ~~impaired~~as ~~loans is based on the present value of the expected cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate~~commercial, ~~the~~commercial ~~market~~real ~~price of the loan~~estate, or the fair value of the underlying collateral. Collateral values are estimated utilizing methods such as appraisals or broker price opinions and taking into consideration the timing of the valuationconstruction, residential ~~the nature of the collateral~~ and ~~such other information as is deemed appropriate~~consumer. ~~These~~ ~~assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.~~ The fair value ~~consists~~ of ~~the~~loans ~~loan~~was ~~balances~~calculated ofby ~~$5.6~~discounting ~~million~~anticipated ~~and~~cash ~~$5.2~~flows ~~million~~based ~~less~~on ~~their~~weighted ~~specific~~average contractual ~~valuation~~maturity, ~~allowances~~weighted ofaverage ~~$1.6~~coupon ~~million~~ and ~~$1.2~~market ~~million as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 310 “Receivables” at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively~~rates.

~~Real~~Impaired ~~Estate Acquired Through Foreclosure and Other Repossessed Assets~~Loans

~~Real~~The ~~estate~~Company ~~acquired~~considers ~~through~~loans ~~foreclosure~~to be impaired when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. All commercial and ~~other~~residential ~~repossessed~~mortgage ~~assets~~non-accrual loans are ~~initially~~considered ~~recorded~~impaired. atThe ~~the~~measurement ~~estimated~~of ~~fair~~impaired loans ~~value,~~is ~~net~~based on the present value of ~~estimated~~the ~~selling~~expected ~~costs,~~cash ~~and~~flows ~~subsequently~~discounted at the ~~lower~~historical effective interest rate, the market price of ~~carrying~~the ~~cost~~loan, or the fair value ~~less~~of ~~estimated~~the ~~costs~~underlying ~~to sell~~collateral. ~~Fair~~ ~~value~~Collateral isvalues ~~determined~~are estimated utilizing ~~third~~methods ~~party~~such as appraisals, or broker price opinions orand taking into consideration the timing of the valuation, the nature of the collateral and such other information ~~similar~~as ~~methods~~is deemed appropriate. ~~Fair~~ ~~value~~These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is ~~updated~~significant atto ~~least~~the ~~annually~~fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balances of $10.0 million and ~~more~~$5.2 ~~often~~million ifless their ~~circumstances~~specific ~~dictate~~valuation allowances of $2.5 million and $1.2 million as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 310 “Receivables” at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

~~Securities~~Real ~~required~~Estate byAcquired ~~Law~~Through Foreclosure and Other Repossessed Assets

~~The~~Real ~~carrying~~estate ~~amount~~acquired through foreclosure and other repossessed assets are initially recorded at the estimated fair value, net of ~~securities~~estimated ~~required~~selling bycosts, ~~law~~and ~~approximates~~subsequently ~~its~~at the lower of carrying cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is determined utilizing third party appraisals, broker price opinions or other similar methods. Fair value is updated at least annually and more often if circumstances dictate.

~~Accrued~~Securities ~~Interest~~required ~~Receivable~~by Law

The carrying amount of ~~accrued~~securities ~~interest~~required by ~~receivable~~law approximates its fair value.

~~Deposits~~Accrued Interest Receivable

The ~~fair~~carrying ~~value~~amount of ~~deposits~~accrued ~~with no stated maturity, such as non-~~interest ~~bearing~~receivable approximates ~~deposits,~~its ~~interest bearing NOW accounts and statement savings accounts, is equal to the carrying amounts. The~~ fair value ~~of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows~~. ~~The discount rate for certificates of deposit was estimated using market rates.~~

~~Long-Term Debt and Junior Subordinated Debentures~~Deposits

The fair value of ~~long~~deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-~~term~~interest ~~debt~~bearing deposits, interest bearing NOW accounts and ~~junior~~statement ~~subordinated~~savings ~~debentures~~accounts, is equal to the carrying amounts. The fair value of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows,. The discount rate for certificates of deposit was estimated using market rates.

~~Accrued~~Long-Term ~~Interest~~Debt ~~Payable~~and Junior Subordinated Debentures

The ~~carrying~~fair ~~amount~~value of ~~accrued~~long-term ~~interest~~debt ~~payable~~and ~~approximates~~junior subordinated ~~its~~debentures ~~fair~~was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, using market rates.

~~Off-Balance~~Accrued ~~Sheet~~Interest ~~Financial Instruments~~Payable

The ~~Company~~carrying isamount ~~a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course~~ of ~~business,~~accrued ~~including mortgage loan commitments, undisbursed lines of credit on commercial business loans and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to various degrees, elements of credit and~~ interest ~~rate~~payable approximates ~~risk~~its ~~in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The~~ fair ~~values of such commitments are immaterial~~value.

~~The~~Off-Balance ~~disclosure~~Sheet ofFinancial fair value amounts does not include the fair values of any intangibles, including core deposit intangibles. Core deposit intangibles represent the value attributable to total deposits based on an expected duration of customer relationships.Instruments

22The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business, including mortgage loan commitments, undisbursed lines of credit on commercial business loans and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to various degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The fair values of such commitments are immaterial.

The Company complies with ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines the concept of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 applies only to fair value measurements required or permitted under current accounting pronouncements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date. The statement also expands disclosures about financial instruments that are measured at fair value and eliminates the use of large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active markets. The disclosure’s emphasis is on the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of the measurement on earnings for the period.23

~~ASC~~The ~~Topic~~disclosure ~~820~~of ~~clarifies how an entity would determine~~ fair value inamounts andoes ~~inactive market and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is,~~ not include ~~a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at~~ the measurement date under current market conditions. ASC Topic 820 provides additional guidance in determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. It also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly. ASC Topic 820 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair ~~value. This~~values ~~guidance clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level~~ of ~~activity~~any ~~for the asset or liability~~intangibles, ~~some~~including ~~transactions~~core ~~may~~deposit ~~not be orderly~~intangibles. In ~~those~~Core ~~situations,~~deposit ~~the~~intangibles ~~entity~~represent ~~must evaluate~~ the ~~weight~~value ~~of the evidence~~ attributable to ~~determine~~total ~~whether~~deposits ~~the~~based ~~transaction~~on isan ~~orderly. The~~expected ~~guidance~~duration ~~provides a list~~ of ~~circumstances~~customer ~~that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly~~relationships. ~~A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.~~

The Company ~~has~~complies anwith ~~established~~ASC ~~and~~Topic ~~documented~~820, ~~process for determining fair values.~~ “Fair Value ~~value~~Measurements isand ~~based on quoted market prices~~Disclosures,” ~~when~~which ~~available. If~~defines ~~listed~~the ~~prices~~concept orof ~~quotes~~fair ~~are not available~~value, ~~fair~~establishes ~~value~~a isframework ~~based~~for onmeasuring fair value ~~models~~in ~~that use market participant or independently sourced market data~~GAAP, ~~which~~and ~~include~~expands ~~discount~~disclosure ~~rate,~~about ~~interest~~fair ~~rate~~value ~~yield~~measurements. ~~curves,~~ASC ~~prepayment~~Topic ~~speeds,~~820 ~~bond~~applies ~~ratings,~~only ~~credit~~to ~~risk,~~fair ~~loss~~value ~~severities,~~measurements ~~default~~required or ~~rates,~~permitted ~~and~~under ~~expected~~current ~~cash~~accounting ~~flow assumptions. In addition~~pronouncements, ~~valuation~~but ~~adjustments~~does ~~may~~not berequire ~~made~~any innew ~~the determination of~~ fair value measurements. ~~These~~ ~~fair~~Fair value ~~adjustments~~is ~~may~~defined as ~~include~~the ~~amounts~~price to ~~reflect~~sell ~~counterparty~~an ~~credit~~asset ~~quality,~~or ~~creditworthiness, liquidity, and other unobservable inputs that are applied consistently over time. These adjustments are estimates and therefore, subject~~ to ~~management’s~~transfer ~~judgment,~~a ~~and~~liability atin ~~times,~~an ~~may~~orderly betransaction ~~necessary~~between towilling ~~mitigate~~market ~~the~~participants ~~possibility~~as of ~~error or revision in~~ the measurement ~~estimate of the fair value provided by the model~~date. The ~~Company~~statement ~~has~~also ~~various~~expands ~~controls~~disclosures inabout ~~place~~financial toinstruments ~~ensure~~ that ~~the valuations~~ are ~~appropriate,~~measured ~~including~~at ~~review~~fair value and ~~approval~~eliminates the use of ~~the~~large ~~valuation~~position ~~models,~~discounts ~~benchmarking,~~for ~~comparison~~financial toinstruments ~~similar~~quoted ~~products,~~in ~~and~~active ~~reviews~~markets. ofThe ~~actual~~disclosure’s ~~cash~~emphasis ~~settlements. The~~is ~~methods~~on ~~described~~the inputs ~~above~~used ~~may~~to ~~produce~~measure fair value ~~calculations~~and ~~that may not be indicative of~~ the ~~net~~effect ~~realizable value or reflective~~ of ~~future fair values. While~~ the ~~Company~~measurement ~~believes~~on ~~its~~earnings ~~valuation~~for ~~methods are consistent with other financial institutions,~~ the ~~use of different methods or assumptions to determine fair values could result in different estimates of fair value~~period.

ASC Topic 820 ~~establishes~~clarifies how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a ~~three-~~forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. ASC Topic 820 provides additional guidance in determining when the volume and level ~~valuation~~of ~~hierarchy~~activity for ~~disclosure~~the asset or liability has significantly decreased. It also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly. ASC Topic 820 provides a list of ~~fair~~factors ~~value~~that ~~measurements~~a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. ~~The~~ ~~valuation~~When ~~hierarchy~~the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is ~~based~~needed and onsignificant adjustments to the ~~inputs~~related ~~used~~prices may be necessary to estimate fair value. This guidance clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the ~~particular~~volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, atsome transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the ~~measurement~~entity ~~date~~must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The ~~three~~guidance provides ~~levels~~a ~~are~~list ~~defined~~of ascircumstances ~~follows:~~that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

·The ~~Level~~Company 1has –an established and documented process for determining fair values. Fair value is based on quoted market prices, when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based on fair value models that use market participant or independently sourced market data, which include discount rate, interest rate yield curves, prepayment speeds, bond ratings, credit risk, loss severities, default rates, and expected cash flow assumptions. In addition, valuation adjustments may be made in the determination of fair value. These fair value adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, creditworthiness, liquidity, and other unobservable inputs that are applied consistently over time. These adjustments are estimates and therefore, subject to management’s judgment, and at times, may be necessary to mitigate the possibility of error or revision in the estimate of the fair value provided by the model. The Company has various controls in place to ensure that the valuations are appropriate, including review and approval of the valuation ~~methodology~~models, benchmarking, comparison to similar products, and reviews of actual cash settlements. The methods described above may produce fair value calculations that may not be indicative of the net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While the Company believes its valuation methods are ~~quoted~~consistent ~~prices~~with ~~(unadjusted)~~other ~~for~~financial ~~identical~~institutions, ~~assets~~the use of different methods or ~~liabilities~~assumptions to determine fair values could result in ~~active~~different ~~markets~~estimates of fair value.

·ASC ~~Level~~Topic 2820 –establishes ~~inputs~~a tothree-level ~~the~~ valuation hierarchy ~~methodology include quoted prices~~ for ~~similar~~disclosure ~~assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices~~ of ~~identical~~fair orvalue ~~similar~~measurements. ~~assets~~The orvaluation ~~liabilities~~hierarchy inis ~~markets~~based ~~that~~on ~~are~~the ~~not active, and~~ inputs ~~that~~used ~~are~~to ~~observable~~value ~~for~~ the particular asset or liability, ~~either~~at ~~directly~~the ormeasurement ~~indirectly,~~date. ~~for~~The ~~substantially~~three ~~the~~levels ~~full~~are ~~term~~defined ofas ~~the financial instrument.~~follows:

· Level 31 – inputs to the valuation methodology are ~~unobservable~~quoted ~~and~~prices ~~significant~~(unadjusted) tofor ~~the~~identical ~~fair~~assets ~~value~~or ~~measurement~~liabilities in active markets.

~~Each~~· ~~financial~~Level ~~instrument’s~~2 ~~level~~– ~~assignment~~inputs ~~within~~to the valuation ~~hierarchy~~methodology isinclude ~~based~~quoted ~~upon~~prices ~~the~~for ~~lowest~~similar ~~level~~assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices of ~~input~~identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that isare ~~significant~~not toactive, and inputs that are observable for the ~~fair~~asset ~~value~~or ~~measurement~~liability, either directly or indirectly, for ~~that~~substantially ~~particular~~the ~~category~~full term of the financial instrument.

~~There~~· ~~were~~Level no3 ~~transfers~~– ofinputs ~~assets~~to ~~between~~the ~~fair~~valuation ~~value~~methodology ~~Level~~are 1unobservable and ~~Level~~significant 2to ~~for~~ the ~~quarter~~fair ~~ended~~value ~~September 30, 2011~~measurement.

23Each financial instrument’s level assignment within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for that particular category.

~~For~~There ~~financial~~were ~~assets~~no ~~measured~~asset attransfers ~~fair~~between fair value onLevel a1 ~~recurring~~ and ~~nonrecurring~~Level ~~basis,~~2 ~~the~~for ~~fair value measurements by level within~~ the ~~fair~~six ~~value~~months ~~hierarchy~~ended ~~are~~December as31, ~~follows:~~2011.

	At September 30, 2011
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Corporate bonds	$	3,780	$	-	$	3,780	$	-
U.S. Government agencies		10,516		-		10,516		-
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		2,706		-		2,706		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		21,850		-		21,850		-
Total securities available for sale	$	38,852	$	-	$	38,852	$	-
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired Loans	$	4,001	$	-	$	-	$	4,001
Repossessed real estate and other assets	$	24	$	-	$	-	$	24

	At June 30, 2011
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Corporate bonds	$	2,955	$	-	$	2,955	$	-
U.S. Government agencies		12,520		-		12,520		-
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		4,098		-		4,098		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		20,241		-		20,241		-
Total securities available for sale	$	39,814	$	-	$	39,814	$	-
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	3,983	$	-	$	-	$	3,983
Repossessed real estate and other assets	$	24	$	-	$	-	$	24

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Note 16: Reclassification

	At December 31, 2011
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Corporate bonds	$	4,564	$	-	$	4,564	$	-
U.S. Government agencies		9,010		-		9,010		-
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		7,647		-		7,647		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		21,110		-		21,110		-
Total securities available for sale	$	42,331	$	-	$	42,331	$	-

Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired Loans	$	7,500	$	-	$	-	$	7,500
Repossessed real estate and other assets	$	607	$	-	$	-	$	607

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. Such reclasses had no impact on the Company’s operations and stockholders’ equity.

	At June 30, 2011
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Corporate bonds	$	2,955	$	-	$	2,955	$	-
U.S. Government agencies		12,520		-		12,520		-
Mortgage-backed securities, residential		4,098		-		4,098		-
Collateralized mortgage obligations, agencies		20,241		-		20,241		-
Total securities available for sale	$	39,814	$	-	$	39,814	$	-

Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	3,983	$	-	$	-	$	3,983
Repossessed real estate and other assets	$	24	$	-	$	-	$	24

~~Item~~Note ~~2. Management's~~16: ~~Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~Reclassification

~~General~~Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. Such reclasses had no impact on the Company’s operations and stockholders’ equity.

~~The~~Item Company's results of operations depend primarily on its level of net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans, investment securities, mortgage-backed securities and other investments, and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and junior subordinated debentures2. ~~The~~ net interest income earned on interest-earning assets ("net interest margin") and the ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities have a significant impact on net interest income. The CompanyManagement's ~~net~~Discussion ~~interest margin is affected by regulatory, economic~~ and ~~competitive~~Analysis factors that influence interest rates, loan and deposit flows. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-earning assets mature or reprice at different times, or on a different basis, than its interest-bearing liabilities. The Company's results of ~~operations~~Financial ~~are~~Condition ~~also significantly impacted by the amount of its non-interest income, including loan fees~~ and ~~service~~Results ~~charges, and levels~~ of non-interest expense, which consists principally of compensation and employee benefits, insurance premiums, professional fees, equipment expense, occupancy costs, advertising, data processing and other operating expenses.Operations

24General

The Company's ~~operating~~ results ~~are~~of ~~significantly~~operations ~~affected~~depend primarily byon ~~general~~its ~~economic~~level ~~and~~of ~~competitive~~net ~~conditions~~interest income, inwhich ~~particular,~~is ~~changes~~the indifference ~~market~~between interest ~~rates~~earned on interest-earning assets, ~~government~~consisting primarily ~~policies~~of ~~and~~loans, ~~actions~~investment ~~taken~~securities, bymortgage-backed ~~regulatory~~securities ~~authorities. Lending~~and ~~activities~~other ~~are~~investments, ~~influenced~~and bythe ~~general~~interest ~~economic~~paid ~~conditions~~on interest-bearing liabilities, ~~competition~~consisting ~~among~~primarily ~~lenders,~~of deposits and advances from the ~~level~~Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and junior subordinated debentures. The net interest ~~rates~~income earned on interest-earning assets ("net interest margin") and the ~~availability~~ratio of ~~funds. Deposit~~interest-earning ~~flows~~assets to ~~and~~interest-bearing ~~costs~~liabilities ofhave ~~funds~~a ~~are~~significant ~~influenced~~impact on net interest income. The Company's net interest margin is affected by ~~prevailing~~regulatory, ~~market~~economic and competitive factors that influence interest rates, ofloan and deposit flows. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-earning assets mature or reprice at different times, ~~primarily~~or on ~~competing~~a ~~investments~~different basis, ~~account~~than ~~maturities~~its ~~and~~interest-bearing liabilities. The Company's results of operations are also significantly impacted by the ~~level~~amount of ~~personal~~its non-interest income, including loan fees and ~~savings~~service incharges, ~~the~~and ~~Company's~~levels ~~market~~of ~~area~~non-interest expense, which consists principally of compensation and employee benefits, insurance premiums, professional fees, equipment expense, occupancy costs, advertising, data processing and other operating expenses.

~~Forward-Looking~~The ~~Statements~~Company's operating results are significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, in particular, changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions taken by regulatory authorities. Lending activities are influenced by general economic conditions, competition among lenders, the level of interest rates and the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of funds are influenced by prevailing market rates of interest, primarily on competing investments, account maturities and the level of personal income and savings in the Company's market area.

When used in this Form 10-Q, the words or phrases "will likely result," "are expected to," "will continue," "is anticipated," "estimate," "project" or similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including changes in economic conditions in the Company's market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuations in interest rates, demand for loans in the Company's market area, competition and the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company's financial performance and could cause the Company's actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.25

~~The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward~~Forward-~~looking~~Looking ~~statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.~~Statements

~~Critical~~When ~~Accounting~~used ~~Policies~~in this Form 10-Q, the words or phrases "will likely result," "are expected to," "will continue," "is anticipated," "estimate," "project" or similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including changes in economic conditions in the Company's market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuations in interest rates, demand for loans in the Company's market area, competition and the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company's financial performance and could cause the Company's actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.

The Company’s ~~consolidated~~does ~~financial~~not statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimatesundertake, ~~assumptions,~~ and ~~judgments~~specifically disclaims ~~that~~any ~~affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates~~obligation, ~~assumptions,~~to ~~and~~publicly ~~judgments~~release ~~are based on information available as of~~ the ~~date~~result of ~~the~~any ~~consolidated~~revisions ~~financial~~which ~~statements;~~may ~~accordingly,~~be asmade ~~this~~to ~~information~~any ~~changes,~~forward-looking ~~the consolidated financial~~ statements ~~could~~ to reflect ~~different~~events ~~estimates,~~or ~~assumptions~~circumstances ~~and~~after ~~judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on~~ the ~~use~~date of ~~estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as~~ such ~~have~~statements aor ~~greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when financial instruments are required~~ to bereflect ~~recorded at fair value or when~~ the ~~decline~~occurrence ~~in the value~~ of ananticipated ~~asset carried on the statement of financial condition at historic cost requires an impairment write-down~~ or ~~a valuation reserve to be established~~unanticipated events.

~~The~~Critical allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) represents an amount, that in the judgment of management, will be adequate to absorb probable losses on outstanding loans and leases that may become uncollectible. The allowance represents an estimate made based upon two principles of accounting: (1) ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies”, that requires losses to be accrued when their occurrence is probable and estimable, and (2) ASC 310, “Receivables”, that requires losses be accrued when it is probable that the lender will not collect all principal and interest due under the original terms of the loan. The adequacy of the allowance is determined through careful evaluation of the loan portfolio. This determination is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience and consideration of the current economic environment that may be subject to change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance and recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to it. The level of the allowance is adjusted through the provision for loan losses that is recorded as a current period expense.Accounting Policies

The ~~methodology~~Company’s ~~for~~consolidated ~~assessing~~financial statements ~~the~~are ~~appropriateness~~prepared ofin ~~the~~accordance ~~allowance~~with ~~includes~~accounting aprinciples ~~specific~~generally ~~allowance,~~accepted ain ~~formula~~the ~~allowance~~United States of America (“GAAP”) and afollow ~~nonspecific~~general ~~allowance~~practices within the industry in which it operates. ~~The~~Application ~~specific~~of ~~allowance~~these isprinciples ~~for~~requires ~~risk~~management ~~rated~~to ~~credits~~make estimates, onassumptions, anand ~~individual~~judgments ~~basis.~~that ~~The~~affect ~~formula~~the ~~allowance~~amounts ~~reflects~~reported ~~historical~~in ~~losses~~the byconsolidated ~~credit~~financial ~~category~~statements and accompanying notes. ~~The~~These ~~nonspecific~~estimates, ~~allowance~~assumptions, ~~captures~~and ~~losses~~judgments ~~whose~~are ~~impact~~based on ~~the~~information ~~portfolio~~available ~~have~~as ~~occurred~~of ~~but~~the ~~have~~date ~~yet~~of tothe beconsolidated ~~recognized~~financial statements; inaccordingly, ~~either~~as this information changes, the ~~specific~~consolidated ~~allowance~~financial orstatements ~~the~~could ~~formula~~reflect ~~allowance~~different estimates, assumptions and judgments. ~~The~~ ~~factors~~Certain ~~used~~policies ininherently ~~determining~~have ~~the~~a ~~nonspecific~~greater ~~allowance~~reliance ~~include~~on ~~trends~~the inuse ~~delinquencies~~of estimates, ~~trends~~assumptions, inand ~~volumes~~ judgments and ~~terms~~as such have a greater possibility of ~~loans~~producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. These estimates, ~~the~~assumptions ~~size~~and ofjudgments ~~loans~~are ~~relative~~necessary when financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair value or when the ~~allowance,~~decline ~~concentration~~in the value of ~~credits,~~an asset carried on the ~~quality~~statement of ~~the~~financial ~~risk~~condition ~~identification~~at ~~system~~historic ~~and~~cost ~~credit~~requires ~~administration~~an ~~and~~impairment ~~local~~write-down or ~~and~~a ~~national~~valuation ~~economic~~reserve ~~trends~~to be established.

25The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) represents an amount, that in the judgment of management, will be adequate to absorb probable losses on outstanding loans and leases that may become uncollectible. The allowance represents an estimate made based upon two principles of accounting: (1) ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies”, that requires losses to be accrued when their occurrence is probable and estimable, and (2) ASC 310, “Receivables”, that requires losses be accrued when it is probable that the lender will not collect all principal and interest due under the original terms of the loan. The adequacy of the allowance is determined through careful evaluation of the loan portfolio. This determination is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience and consideration of the current economic environment that may be subject to change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance and recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to it. The level of the allowance is adjusted through the provision for loan losses that is recorded as a current period expense.

InThe ~~accordance~~methodology ~~with~~for assessing the ~~provisions~~ appropriateness of ~~ASC 310,~~ the ~~Company~~allowance ~~determines~~includes ~~and~~a ~~recognizes~~specific ~~impairment~~allowance, ofa ~~certain~~formula ~~loans. A~~allowance ~~loan~~and isa ~~determined~~nonspecific toallowance. beThe ~~impaired~~specific ~~when,~~allowance ~~based~~is onfor risk ~~current~~rated ~~information~~credits ~~and~~on ~~events,~~an itindividual isbasis. ~~probable~~The ~~that~~formula ~~the~~allowance ~~Company~~reflects ~~will~~historical belosses ~~unable~~by tocredit ~~collect~~category. ~~all~~The ~~amounts~~nonspecific allowance ~~due~~captures ~~according~~losses towhose ~~the~~impact ~~contractual~~on ~~terms of~~ the ~~loan~~portfolio ~~agreement. A~~have ~~loan~~occurred isbut ~~not~~have ~~considered~~yet ~~impaired~~to ~~during~~be arecognized ~~period of insignificant delay~~ in ~~payment~~either if the ~~Company~~specific ~~expects~~allowance or tothe ~~collect~~formula ~~all amounts due, including past-due interest~~allowance. The ~~Company~~factors ~~generally~~used ~~considers~~in adetermining ~~period~~the ofnonspecific ~~insignificant~~allowance ~~delay in payment to~~ include ~~delinquency~~trends ~~up to and including 90 days. ASC Topic 310 requires that impairment~~ in adelinquencies, ~~loan be measured at~~ the ~~present~~size ~~value~~ of loans ~~its~~relative ~~expected~~to ~~future cash flows discounted at~~ the ~~loan's effective interest rate~~allowance, ~~or at~~ the ~~loan's~~quality ~~observable~~of ~~market price or~~ the ~~fair~~risk ~~value~~identification ofsystem ~~the~~and ~~collateral~~credit ifadministration ~~the~~and ~~loan~~local isand ~~collateral~~national economic ~~dependent~~trends.

~~ASC~~In ~~Topic~~accordance ~~310~~with isthe ~~generally~~provisions ~~applicable~~of ~~for~~ASC ~~all~~310, the ~~loans~~Company ~~except~~determines ~~large~~and ~~groups~~recognizes impairment of ~~smaller-balance~~certain ~~homogeneous~~ loans. ~~that~~A ~~are~~loan ~~evaluated~~is ~~collectively~~determined ~~for~~to ~~impairment~~be impaired when, ~~including~~based ~~residential~~on ~~first~~current information and ~~second~~events, ~~mortgage~~it ~~loans~~is ~~and~~probable ~~consumer~~that ~~installment~~the ~~loans. Impaired~~Company ~~loans~~will ~~are~~be ~~therefore~~unable ~~generally~~to ~~comprised~~collect ofall ~~commercial~~amounts ~~mortgage,~~due ~~real~~according ~~estate~~to ~~development,~~the ~~and~~contractual ~~certain~~terms ~~restructured~~of ~~residential~~the loan ~~loans~~agreement. In ~~addition,~~A loan is not considered impaired ~~loans~~during ~~are~~a ~~generally~~period ~~loans~~of ~~which~~insignificant ~~management~~delay ~~has~~in ~~placed~~payment onif ~~non-accrual~~the ~~status~~Company ~~since~~expects ~~loans~~to ~~are~~collect all ~~placed~~amounts ondue, ~~non~~including past-~~accrual~~due ~~status~~interest. onThe ~~the~~Company ~~earlier~~generally considers a period of ~~the~~insignificant ~~date~~delay ~~that~~in ~~management~~payment ~~determines~~to include delinquency up to and including 90 days. ASC Topic 310 requires that impairment in a loan be measured at the ~~collection~~present value of ~~principal~~its expected ~~and/or~~future ~~interest~~cash isflows indiscounted ~~doubt~~at the loan's effective interest rate, or at the ~~date~~loan's ~~that~~observable ~~principal~~market price or ~~interest~~the isfair value 90of ~~days~~the orcollateral ~~more~~if ~~past-due~~the loan is collateral dependent.

Management believes that the allowance is adequate. However, its determination requires significant judgment, and estimates of the probable losses in the loan and lease portfolio can vary significantly from amounts that actually occur.26

~~Real~~ASC ~~estate~~Topic ~~acquired~~310 ~~through~~is ~~foreclosure~~generally ~~and~~applicable ~~other~~for ~~repossessed~~all loans ~~assets~~except ~~are~~large ~~initially~~groups ~~recorded~~of atsmaller-balance ~~the~~homogeneous ~~estimated~~loans ~~fair~~that ~~value~~are evaluated collectively for impairment, ~~net~~including ofresidential first ~~estimated~~and ~~selling~~second ~~costs,~~mortgage loans and ~~subsequently~~consumer atinstallment ~~the~~loans. ~~lower~~Impaired ofloans ~~carrying~~are ~~cost~~therefore orgenerally ~~fair~~comprised ~~value~~of ~~less~~commercial mortgage, ~~estimated~~real ~~costs~~estate todevelopment, ~~sell~~and certain restructured residential loans. ~~Costs~~ ~~relating~~In toaddition, ~~holding~~impaired ~~such~~loans ~~property~~are generally loans which management has placed on non-accrual status since loans are ~~charged~~placed ~~against~~on ~~income~~non-accrual instatus on the ~~current~~earlier ~~period,~~of ~~while~~the ~~costs~~date ~~relating~~that management todetermines ~~improving~~that ~~such~~the ~~real~~collection ~~estate~~of ~~are~~principal ~~capitalized~~and/or ~~until~~interest ais ~~salable~~in ~~condition~~doubt or the date that principal or interest is ~~reached~~90 days or more past-due.

~~Marketable~~Management ~~equity~~believes ~~securities~~that ~~and debt securities not classified as held to maturity or trading are classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are acquired as part of~~ the ~~Company’s~~allowance ~~asset/liability~~is ~~management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, loan demand, changes in prepayment risk and other factors~~adequate. ~~Securities available for sale are carried at fair value~~ However, ~~with~~its ~~unrealized~~determination ~~gains~~requires orsignificant ~~losses based on the difference between amortized cost and fair value~~judgment, ~~reported net of deferred tax, as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains~~ and ~~losses,~~estimates ~~using the specific identification method, are included as a separate component~~ of ~~non-interest income. Related interest and dividends are included in interest income. Declines in~~ the ~~fair~~probable ~~value~~losses ~~of individual securities below their cost that are other than temporary result~~ in ~~write-downs of~~ the ~~individual~~loan securities to their fair value through either a charge to earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income depending upon the nature of the loss. Management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and ~~(b)~~lease itportfolio can isvary ~~more~~significantly ~~likely~~from ~~than~~amounts ~~not~~ that itactually ~~will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery~~occur. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Other factors affecting the determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred include a downgrading of the security by a rating agency or a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer.

~~Deferred~~Real ~~income~~estate ~~taxes~~acquired ~~are~~through ~~reported~~foreclosure ~~for temporary differences between items of income or expense reported in the consolidated financial statements~~ and other ~~those~~repossessed reported for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences between the consolidated financial statements carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets ~~and liabilities~~ are ~~expected~~initially torecorded beat ~~reported in an institution’s income tax returns. Deferred tax assets are deferred tax consequences attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards. After~~ the ~~deferred~~estimated ~~tax~~fair ~~asset has been measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted tax law~~value, itnet ~~is then necessary to assess the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is needed when, based on the weight~~ of ~~the~~estimated ~~available~~selling ~~evidence~~costs, itand issubsequently ~~more likely than not that some portion of~~ at the ~~deferred~~lower ~~tax asset will not be realized. As required by GAAP, available evidence is weighted heavily on cumulative losses with less weight placed on future projected profitability. Realization~~ of ~~the~~carrying ~~deferred~~cost ~~tax asset is dependent on whether there will be sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character in the period during which deductible temporary differences reverse~~ or ~~within~~fair ~~the~~value ~~carryback~~less ~~and~~estimated ~~carryforward~~costs ~~periods~~to ~~available under tax law~~sell. ~~Based~~ ~~upon~~Costs ~~the~~relating ~~available evidence, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $2.2 million at June 30, 2011. Subsequent~~ to ~~recording~~holding ~~this~~such ~~valuation~~property ~~allowance,~~are ~~the~~charged ~~deferred~~against income ~~tax asset balance was zero at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011. The deferred tax provision for the year is equal to the net change~~ in the ~~net~~current ~~deferred tax asset from the beginning to the end of the year~~period, ~~less~~while ~~amounts~~costs ~~applicable~~relating to ~~the~~improving ~~change~~such inreal ~~value~~estate ~~related~~are tocapitalized ~~investments~~until ~~available for sale. The effect on deferred taxes of~~ a ~~change~~salable incondition ~~tax rates~~ is ~~recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date~~reached.

26Marketable equity securities and debt securities not classified as held to maturity or trading are classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are acquired as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, loan demand, changes in prepayment risk and other factors. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses based on the difference between amortized cost and fair value, reported net of deferred tax, as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses, using the specific identification method, are included as a separate component of non-interest income. Related interest and dividends are included in interest income. Declines in the fair value of individual securities below their cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value through either a charge to earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income depending upon the nature of the loss. Management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Other factors affecting the determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred include a downgrading of the security by a rating agency or a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer.

~~Comparison~~Deferred income taxes are reported for temporary differences between items of ~~Financial~~income ~~Condition~~or expense reported in the consolidated financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences between the consolidated financial statements carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities are expected to be reported in an institution’s income tax returns. Deferred tax assets are deferred tax consequences attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards. After the deferred tax asset has been measured using the applicable enacted tax rate and provisions of the enacted tax law, it is then necessary to assess the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is needed when, based on the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. As required by GAAP, available evidence is weighted heavily on cumulative losses with less weight placed on future projected profitability. Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent on whether there will be sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character in the period during which deductible temporary differences reverse or within the carryback and carryforward periods available under tax law. Based upon the available evidence, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $2.2 million at ~~September~~June 30, 2011. ~~and~~Subsequent to recording this valuation allowance, the deferred tax asset balance was zero at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date.

~~The~~Comparison ~~Company’s~~of ~~assets~~Financial ~~decreased~~Condition ~~$8.6 million to $256.0 million~~ at ~~September 30~~December 31, 2011 ~~compared~~and ~~to $264.6 million at~~ June 30, 2011. Net loans declined $2.1 million or 1.1% to $180.5 million at September 30, 2011 from $182.6 million at June 30, 2011. Growth in residential mortgage loans of $1.1 million was more than offset by decreases in commercial mortgages of $1.3 million, construction loans of $601,000, consumer loans of $338,000 and commercial business loans of $982,000. Such decreases were due primarily to soft loan demand.

~~Securities~~The ~~available~~Company’s ~~for~~assets ~~sale~~ decreased $~~962,000~~10.5 million to $38254.91 million at ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 ~~from~~compared to $39264.86 million at June 30, 2011. asNet ~~maturities~~loans ofdeclined $43.02 million or 1.7% to $179.4 million at December 31, ~~sales~~2011 offrom $3182.36 million ~~and~~at ~~pay-downs~~June of30, ~~the~~2011. Growth in residential mortgage~~-backed~~ ~~securities~~loans of $14.6 3 million, aswas ~~well~~more asthan ~~the~~offset ~~decline~~by decreases in ~~loan~~commercial ~~balances,~~mortgages ~~were~~of ~~replaced~~$1.7 bymillion, ~~new~~construction ~~purchases~~loans of ~~investment~~$447,000, ~~securities~~consumer loans of $81.0 million and commercial business loans of $3.6 million. Such decreases were due primarily to soft loan demand.

Real estate acquired through foreclosure increased $247,000 to $1.9 million as of September 30, 2011 as there were six properties totaling $410,000 in additions and $151,000 that sold at a $12,000 loss.27

~~Total~~Securities ~~deposits~~available ~~declined~~for ~~$5.3~~sale ~~million,~~increased or $2.~~3%,~~5 million to $~~226~~42.03 million at ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 from $~~231~~39.38 million at June 30, 2011~~. Interest-bearing~~ ~~deposits~~as ~~decreased~~maturities of $49.40 million, orsales ~~2.0%,~~of to $~~216~~3.5 3 million atand ~~September~~pay-downs ~~30,~~of ~~2011~~the ~~from~~mortgage-backed securities of $~~220~~3.8 million ~~at June 30~~, ~~2011. Noninterest-bearing~~as ~~deposits~~well ~~declined~~as ~~$908,000~~the todecline ~~$9.6~~in ~~million~~loan ~~at September 30~~balances, ~~2011. Long-term~~were ~~debt~~replaced by ~~declined~~new ~~$3.0~~purchases ~~million~~of toinvestment ~~$9.0~~securities ~~million~~of ~~at September 30, 2011 from~~ $1219.0 million ~~at June 30, 2011~~.

~~Stockholders’~~Real ~~equity~~estate ~~increased~~acquired bythrough foreclosure increased $~~232~~741,000 ~~from~~to $142.4 million atas ~~June~~of 30December 31, 2011 toas ~~$14.6~~there ~~million~~were atsix ~~September~~properties 30totaling $998,000 ~~2011~~in ~~primarily~~additions ~~reflecting~~and ~~the~~$196,000 ~~earnings~~that were ~~during~~sold ~~the~~at ~~current~~a ~~year-to-date~~$12,000 ~~period~~gain.

~~Comparison~~Total ofdeposits ~~Operating~~declined ~~Results~~$6.3 ~~for~~million, ~~the~~or ~~Quarter~~2.7%, to ~~Ended~~$225.0 ~~September~~million at December 31, 2011 from $231.3 million at June 30, 2011 ~~and~~as ~~September~~management lowered deposit rates more aggressively than the competition in order reduce excess cash reserves. Interest-bearing deposits decreased $5.6 million, or 2.5%, to $215.2 million at December 31, 2011 from $220.8 million at June 30, ~~2010~~2011. Noninterest-bearing deposits declined $678,000 to $9.8 million at December 31, 2011. Long-term debt declined $3.0 million to $9.0 million at December 31, 2011 from $12.0 million at June 30, 2011.

~~Net~~Stockholders’ equity ~~Income. The~~decreased ~~Company~~by ~~recorded net income available to common shareholders of~~ $~~128~~978,000, orfrom $014.074 ~~per~~million ~~common~~at ~~share,~~June ~~for the quarter ended September~~ 30, 2011 ~~compared~~ to ~~net income of~~ $~~10,000, or $0~~13.014 ~~per~~million share for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The improvement in earnings in the current quarter was the result of improvement in net interest income as the impact of a lower cost of funds more than offset the negative impact of the shift in earnings assets from loans to investments. In addition, income tax expense was zero in the current quarter as The Company fully reserved for deferred tax assets at ~~June~~December 3031, 2011~~. Accordingly,~~ ~~taxes~~primarily onreflecting the loss ~~current~~during ~~quarter’s earnings were offset by a reversal of~~ the ~~related~~current ~~portion~~year-to-date ~~of this reserve~~period.

~~Net~~Comparison ~~Interest~~of ~~Income. The~~Operating ~~Company’s~~Results ~~net interest income increased by $45,000, or 2.2%, to $2.14 million~~ for the Three ~~quarter~~and ~~ended~~Six ~~September~~Months ~~30,~~Ended ~~2011~~December compared to $2.09 million for the same quarter in 2010. The slight increase in net interest income during the comparable three-month period was due to a 9 basis point improvement in the net interest margin from 3.31~~% in the quarter ended September 30~~, ~~2010~~2011 toand ~~3.40%~~December ~~in the current quarter~~31, ~~which was almost completely offset by a $13.9 million decline in average loans. The increase in the net interest margin was the result of the lower cost of deposits and borrowings.~~2010

~~Interest~~Net Income. ~~Total~~ The ~~interest~~Company ~~income~~recorded ~~decreased~~a bynet ~~$296,000,~~loss orapplicable ~~9%,~~ to common shareholders of $31.01 million, ~~for~~or $0.55 per common share, for the quarter ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 ~~from~~compared to net loss of $3445,000, or $0.323 ~~million~~per share for the quarter ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2010. The ~~decreases~~larger loss in ~~interest income during~~ the ~~three~~current ~~month~~quarter ~~period~~ was ~~due~~primarily tothe ~~lower~~result ~~rates~~ of ~~interest earned in addition to~~ a ~~lower~~higher ~~level~~loan ofloss ~~earning assets~~provision. ~~The~~ ~~impact~~In ofaddition, ~~lower~~income ~~market~~tax ~~interest~~benefit was ~~rates~~zero in the current ~~three~~quarter ~~month~~as ~~period~~the ~~had~~Company afully ~~negative~~reserved ~~effect~~for ondeferred ~~the~~tax ~~yields~~assets onat ~~earning~~June ~~assets~~30, 2011. In ~~addition~~Accordingly, athe ~~shift~~tax inbenefit on the ~~mix~~current ofquarter’s ~~earning~~net ~~assets~~loss ~~from~~was ~~loans~~offset toby ~~lower yielding investments and~~ a ~~decline~~similar ~~in the yield on loans negatively affected the yield on average earning assets~~reserve.

~~Interest~~For ~~income~~the onsix ~~loans~~months ~~receivable~~ended ~~decreased~~December ~~by $349~~31,~~000,~~ ~~or 11%~~2011, the toCompany ~~$2.7~~recorded ~~million~~a ~~for~~net ~~the~~loss ~~quarter~~applicable ~~ended~~to ~~September~~common ~~30,~~shareholders ~~2011~~of ~~from~~ $~~3.1~~955,000 ~~million~~compared ~~for~~to ~~the~~a ~~quarter~~loss ~~ended~~of ~~September 30~~$435,000 ~~2010. The~~for ~~decreases~~the same period in ~~interest~~2010 ~~income~~as onthe ~~loans~~loan ~~for~~loss ~~the~~provision ~~quarter~~increased ~~was~~$298,000 ~~due~~ to ~~lower~~$1.6 ~~yields~~million asin ~~well~~the ascurrent ~~lower~~period ~~average~~from ~~loan balances~~$1. ~~The~~3 ~~lower~~million ~~yields~~in ~~were~~the ~~due~~same toperiod of the ~~decline~~prior inyear. ~~market~~In ~~interest~~addition, ~~rates~~consistent ~~mentioned~~with ~~above. The~~the ~~lower~~current ~~loan~~quarter ~~volumes~~no ~~were~~income ~~due~~tax tobenefit awas ~~continued~~recorded ~~drop~~for inthe ~~loan~~six ~~demand~~months ~~over~~ended December ~~the~~31, ~~previous year~~2012.

Net Interest ~~income~~Income. onThe ~~investment~~Company’s net ~~securities,~~interest ~~including~~income ~~investments~~decreased ~~required~~ by ~~law, increased~~ $5492,000, or 264.4%, to $~~260,000~~2.01 inmillion for the ~~three~~quarter ~~month period~~ ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2011, ascompared to $2.11 million for the ~~increase~~same quarter in ~~volumes~~2010. ~~for~~The ~~the~~slight ~~respective~~decrease ~~periods~~in ~~more~~net ~~than~~interest ~~offset~~income during the ~~declines~~comparable three-month period was due to a $10.3 million decline in ~~the~~average ~~yield~~earning ~~over~~assets from $255.8 million in the ~~same~~quarter ~~periods~~December 31, 2010 to $245.5 million in the current quarter.

~~Interest~~For ~~income~~the onsix ~~federal~~months ~~funds~~ended ~~sold~~December ~~and~~31, ~~other~~2011 net ~~investments~~interest ~~was~~income ~~flat~~declined at $1347,000, inas ~~the~~average ~~three~~interest ~~month~~earning ~~period~~assets declined $6.0 million from $253.3 million for the six months ended ~~September~~December 3031, ~~2011~~2010 versus $247. 3 million for the current year to date period.

27Interest Income. Total interest income decreased by $398,000, or 12%, to $2.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 from $3.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. Total interest income for the six months ended December 31, 2011 decreased $694,000 to $5.8 million from $6.5 million in the comparable period of the prior year. The decreases in interest income during the three and six month periods were due to lower rates of interest earned in addition to a lower level of earning assets. The impact of lower market interest rates in the current three and six month periods had a negative effect on the yields on earning assets. In addition, a shift in the mix of earning assets from loans to lower yielding investments and a decline in the yield on loans negatively affected the yield on average earning assets.

Interest ~~Expense. Total~~income ~~interest~~on ~~expense~~loans receivable decreased by $~~341~~424,000, or 2814%, to $~~872,000~~2.6 million for the quarter ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2011 from $13.20 million for the quarter ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2010. For the six months ended December 31, 2011, interest income on loans declined $773,000 to $5.3 million from $6.1 million in the same period of the prior year. The ~~decline~~decreases in interest ~~expense~~income ~~during~~on loans for the ~~comparable~~current ~~three~~quarter ~~month~~and year to date periods ~~was~~were due to lower ~~rates~~yields ~~paid~~as onwell as lower average loan balances. The lower yields were due to the decline in market interest~~-bearing~~ ~~liabilities~~rates asmentioned ~~well~~above. asThe lower loan volumes were due to a ~~lower~~continued ~~volume~~drop ofin ~~borrowings~~loan demand over the previous year.

~~Interest expense on deposits decreased by $264,000, or~~ 28%, to $685,000 in the current quarter from $949,000 in the previous year’s comparable quarter. The decrease in interest expense on deposits in the quarterly periods was due to a decline in rates paid on deposits. The lower rates paid on deposits reflect the lower rate environment in the current periods as well as a continued moderation of the competitive pressures.

Interest ~~expense~~income on ~~long-term~~investment securities, ~~borrowings~~including ~~decreased~~investments required by law, increased $7731,000, or 2915%, to $~~187~~236,000 ~~for~~and by $85,000, or 21%, to $496,000 in the ~~quarter~~three and six month periods ended ~~September~~December 3031, 2011~~. The~~, ~~decreases~~as inthe ~~interest~~increase ~~expense~~ in ~~the~~volumes ~~comparable~~for ~~three~~the ~~month~~respective periods ~~were~~more ~~due~~than tooffset the ~~lower~~declines ~~average~~in ~~balances~~the ~~outstanding~~yield over the same periods.

~~Average~~Interest ~~Balance,~~income ~~Interest~~on federal funds sold and other ~~Average~~investments ~~Yields~~was $5,000 lower to $11,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and ~~Rates~~$6,000 lower to $24,000 in the six month periods ended December 31, 2011 due primarily to lower volumes.

~~The~~Interest ~~following~~Expense. Total ~~table~~interest ~~sets~~expense ~~forth~~decreased ~~certain~~by ~~information~~$306,000, ~~relating~~or 28%, to ~~the~~$799,000 ~~Company’s~~for ~~average~~the ~~interest-earning~~quarter ~~assets~~ended ~~and~~December ~~interest-bearing~~31, ~~liabilities~~2011 ~~and~~from ~~reflects~~$1.1 million for the ~~average~~quarter ~~yield~~ended onDecember ~~assets~~31, ~~and~~2010. ~~cost~~For ofthe ~~liabilities~~six ~~for~~month ~~the~~period ~~periods~~ended ~~and~~December at31, ~~the~~2011 ~~dates~~total ~~indicated~~interest expense decreased $647,000 to $1. ~~Dividing~~7 ~~income~~million orfrom ~~expense~~$2.3 bymillion in the ~~average~~six ~~daily~~month ~~balance~~period ofended ~~assets~~December ~~or liabilities~~31, ~~respectively,~~2010. ~~derives~~The ~~such~~decline ~~yields~~in ~~and~~interest ~~costs~~expense ~~for~~ during the comparable three and six month periods ~~presented. Average~~were ~~balances~~due ~~are~~to ~~derived~~lower ~~from~~rates ~~daily~~paid ~~balances~~on interest-bearing liabilities as well as a lower volume of borrowings.

~~The~~Interest ~~table~~expense ~~also~~on ~~presents~~deposits ~~information~~decreased ~~for~~by ~~the~~$254,000, or ~~periods~~29%, ~~indicated~~to ~~with~~$634,000 ~~respect~~in to the ~~Company’s~~current ~~net~~quarter ~~interest~~from ~~margin~~$888,000 ~~which~~in isthe ~~net~~previous ~~interest~~year’s ~~income~~comparable ~~divided~~quarter. byFor the ~~average~~six ~~balance~~months ofended December ~~interest~~31, ~~earning~~2011, ~~assets. This~~interest inexpense anon ~~important~~deposits ~~indicator~~decreased of$518,000, ~~commercial~~or ~~bank~~28%, ~~profitability~~to $1. ~~The~~3 ~~net~~million ~~interest~~from ~~margin~~$1.8 ismillion ~~affected~~in bythe ~~yields~~six onmonths ended ~~interest-earning~~December ~~assets~~31, ~~the~~2010. ~~costs~~The ofdecrease in interest~~-bearing~~ ~~liabilities~~expense ~~and~~on ~~the~~deposits ~~relative~~in ~~amounts~~the ofquarterly ~~interest earning assets~~ and ~~interest~~year ~~bearing~~to ~~liabilities. Another~~date ~~indicator~~periods ofwere ~~the~~due ~~Company’s~~to ~~net~~a ~~interest~~decline in ~~income~~rates ispaid ~~the~~on ~~interest~~deposits. ~~rate~~The ~~spread,~~lower orrates ~~the~~paid ~~difference~~on ~~between~~deposits reflect the ~~average~~lower ~~yield~~rate onenvironment ~~interest~~in ~~earning~~the ~~assets~~current ~~and~~periods ~~the~~as ~~average~~well ~~rate~~as a ~~paid~~continued onmoderation ~~interest~~of ~~bearing~~the ~~liabilities~~competitive pressures.

28Interest expense on long-term borrowings decreased $52,000, or 24%, to $165,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2011. For the six months ended December 31, 2011, interest expense on long-term borrowings decreased $129,000, or 27% to $352,000 from $481,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2010. The decreases in interest expense in the comparable three and six month periods were due to lower average balances outstanding.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011							2010
	Average				Average			Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Rate(1)			Balance		Interest		Rate(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, including fees (2)	$	185,992	$	2,734		5.75	%	$	199,882	$	3,083		6.08	%
Securities, including securities required by law		42,584		260		2.39	%		27,410		206		3.01	%
Federal funds sold and other investments		20,503		13		0.26	%		23,054		14		0.23	%
Total interest earning assets		249,079		3,007		4.72	%		250,346		3,303		5.21	%
Non-interest-earning assets		11,220							18,749
Total assets	$	260,299						$	269,095
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits	$	218,129		685		1.25	%	$	218,246		949		1.72	%
Long-term borrowings		16,380		187		4.46	%		22,100		264		4.68	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		234,509		872		1.47	%		240,346		1,213		2.00	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		11,099							11,026
Total liabilities		245,608							251,372
Stockholders' equity		14,691							17,723
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	260,299						$	269,095
Net Interest Income			$	2,135						$	2,090
Interest rate spread						3.25	%						3.21	%
Net interest margin						3.40	%						3.31	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						106.21	%						104.16	%

Average Balance, Interest and Average Yields and Rates

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company’s average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and reflects the average yield ~~(1) Yields~~on assets and ~~rates~~cost of liabilities for the periods and at the dates indicated. Dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, derives such yields and costs for the periods presented. Average balances are ~~annualized~~derived from daily balances.

~~(2) Includes~~The ~~nonaccrual~~table ~~loans~~also presents information for the periods indicated with respect to the Company’s net interest margin, which is net interest income divided by the average balance of interest earning assets. This in an important indicator of commercial bank profitability. The net interest margin is affected by yields on interest-earning assets, the costs of interest-bearing liabilities and the relative amounts of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Another indicator of the Company’s net interest income is the interest rate spread, or the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

Provision for Loan Losses. Provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to maintain the total allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate by management to provide for loan losses. The components of the allowance for loan losses represent an estimation done pursuant to either ASC Topic 450 and ASC 310. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is determined through a continuous review of the loan portfolio and considers factors such as prior loss experience, type of collateral, industry standards, amount and type of past due loans in the Company’s loan portfolio, current economic conditions, both national and local, and other factors unique to particular loans and leases in the portfolio. The Company’s management periodically monitors and adjusts its allowance for loan losses based upon its analysis of the loan portfolio.

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2011							2010
	Average				Average			Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Rate(1)			Balance		Interest		Rate(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, including fees (2)	$	184,434	$	2,566		5.57	%	$	198,686	$	2,990		6.02	%
Securities, including securities required by law		42,292		236		2.23	%		31,898		205		2.57	%
Federal funds sold and other investments		18,791		11		0.22	%		25,243		16		0.26	%
Total interest earning assets		245,517		2,813		4.58	%		255,827		3,211		5.02	%
Non-interest-earning assets		11,209							18,023
Total assets	$	256,726						$	273,850

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits	$	216,398		634		1.19	%	$	223,639		888		1.61	%
Long-term borrowings		14,000		165		4.73	%		19,661		217		4.39	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		230,398		799		1.40	%		243,300		1,105		1.84	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		11,434							10,670
Total liabilities		241,832							253,970
Stockholders' equity		14,894							19,880
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	256,726						$	273,850

Net Interest Income			$	2,014						$	2,106
Interest rate spread						3.18	%						3.18	%
Net interest margin						3.33	%						3.34	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						106.56	%						105.15	%

~~The~~(1) Yields ~~provision~~and ~~for~~rates loan losses was $323,000 in the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to $304,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The Company’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 2.22% as of September 30, 2011 versus 2.25% at June 30, 2011. Patapsco Bancorp’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 41.4% at September 30, 2011 as compared to 42.2% at June 30, 2011. Setting the allowance at this level takes into consideration that 95% of non-performing loans are ~~collateralized by real estate at September 30, 2011~~annualized. In consideration of the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, downward adjustments were made to values established by real estate appraisals, where warranted, taking into consideration the age of the appraisal and the nature of the collateral. These adjusted appraisal values, which required management’s judgment, were used to develop estimated losses and related specific loss reserves within the allowance for loan losses. The Company has concluded, after a thorough analysis of the nonperforming loan portfolio, watch list loans, delinquencies and other factors, that the allowance is adequate at September 30, 2011.

~~The~~(2) Includes ~~following~~nonaccrual ~~table sets forth information with respect to the Company's non-performing assets at the dates indicated~~loans.

	September 30,		June 30,
(in thousands)	2011		2011
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis (1)	$	9,882	$	9,946
Accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more		-		-
Total non-performing loans		9,882		9,946
Other non-performing assets (2)		1,936		1,689
Total non-performing assets	$	11,818	$	11,635

(1) Nonaccrual status denotes loans on which, in the opinion of management, the collection of additional interest is unlikely. Payments received on a nonaccrual loan are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan. Of the $9,882 and $9,946 of non-accrual loans, $8,161 and $5,324 were considered troubled debt restructurings as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

	Six Months Ended December 31,
	2011							2010
	Average				Average			Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Rate(1)			Balance		Interest		Rate(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, including fees (2)	$	185,252	$	5,300		5.60	%	$	199,506	$	6,073		6.00	%
Securities, including securities required by law		42,438		496		2.29	%		29,668		411		2.77	%
Federal funds sold and other investments		19,646		24		0.24	%		24,148		30		0.25	%
Total interest earning assets		247,336		5,820		4.60	%		253,322		6,514		5.07	%
Non-interest-earning assets		11,174							17,195
Total assets	$	258,510						$	270,517

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits	$	217,263		1,319		1.20	%	$	220,943		1,837		1.65	%
Long-term borrowings		15,190		352		4.54	%		20,880		481		4.50	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		232,453		1,671		1.42	%		241,823		2,318		1.90	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		11,267							10,848
Total liabilities		243,720							252,671
Stockholders' equity		14,790							17,846
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	258,510						$	270,517

Net interest income			$	4,149						$	4,196

Interest rate spread						3.18	%						3.17	%
Net Interest margin						3.33	%						3.29	%

Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						106.40	%						104.76	%

(21) Yields ~~Other~~and ~~nonperforming~~rates ~~assets~~are ~~represent property acquired through foreclosure or repossession~~annualized.

~~Refer~~(2) Includes tononaccrual ~~Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of troubled debt restructurings~~loans.

~~The following table reflects the activity in non-performing loans for the three months ended September 30, 2011:~~31

(Provision for Loan Losses. Provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to maintain the total allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate by management to provide for loan losses. The components of the allowance for loan losses represent an estimation done pursuant to either ASC Topic 450 and ASC 310. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is determined through a continuous review of the loan portfolio and considers factors such as prior loss experience, type of collateral, industry standards, amount and type of past due loans in ~~thousands)~~the Company’s loan portfolio, current economic conditions, both national and local, and other factors unique to particular loans and leases in the portfolio. The Company’s management periodically monitors and adjusts its allowance for loan losses based upon its analysis of the loan portfolio.

Balance June 30, 2011	$	9,946
Added to non-accrual during the quarter		1,928
Paid off/down		(1,107	)
Brought to accrual status		(111	)
Transferred to real estate acquired through foreclosure		(410	)
Charged-Off		(373	)
Net change in non-accrual Consumer & Residential Mortgages, and all other		9
Balance September 30, 2011	$	9,882

The provision for loan losses was $1.3 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2011, compared to $994,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. The Company’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 2.67% as of December 31, 2011 versus 2.25% at June 30, 2011. Patapsco Bancorp’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 36.4% at December 31, 2011 as compared to 42.2% at June 30, 2011. Setting the allowance at this level takes into consideration that 95% of non-performing loans are collateralized by real estate at December 31, 2011. In consideration of the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, downward adjustments were made to values established by real estate appraisals, where warranted, taking into consideration the age of the appraisal and the nature of the collateral. These adjusted appraisal values, which required management’s judgment, were used to develop estimated losses and related specific loss reserves within the allowance for loan losses. The Company has concluded, after a thorough analysis of the nonperforming loan portfolio, watch list loans, delinquencies and other factors, that the allowance is adequate at December 31, 2011.

AtThe ~~September~~following ~~30,~~table ~~2011,~~sets ~~non-accrual~~forth ~~construction~~information with ~~loans~~respect ~~totaled~~to ~~$1.8~~the ~~million~~Company's ~~and consisted of a $1.2 million commercial land development loan and a $564,000 residential land development loan. Non~~non-~~accrual~~performing ~~commercial~~assets ~~real~~at ~~estate~~the ~~loans~~dates ~~include a $1~~indicated.8 million strip shopping center loan, $1.1 million residential investment loan, $857,000 warehouse building loan, and $789,000 in mixed use commercial mortgage loans. Non-accrual commercial loans include a $2.5 million loan supporting a borrower’s various business interests including commercial properties.

Noninterest Income. The Company’s non-interest income consists of deposit fees, service charges, income from bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) and gains. Total non-interest income increased by $12,000, or 5.0%, to $252,000 in the three month period ended September 30, 2011 due to a $3,000 increase in deposit service fees and $6,000 more in gains on the sale of securities available for sale in the current quarter.

	December 31,		June 30,
(in thousands)	2011		2011

Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis (1)	$	13,475	$	9,946
Accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more		-		-
Total non-performing loans		13,475		9,946
Other non-performing assets (2)		2,430		1,689
Total non-performing assets	$	15,905	$	11,635

(1) Nonaccrual status denotes loans on which, in the opinion of management, the collection of additional interest is unlikely. Payments received on a nonaccrual loan are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan. Of the $13,475 and $9,946 of non-accrual loans, $5,620 and $5,324 were considered troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

~~Noninterest~~(2) ~~Expenses.~~Other ~~Total~~nonperforming ~~non-interest~~assets ~~expenses~~represent ~~decreased~~property by $18,000, or 1.0%, to $1.84 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 from $1.86 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. Compensation costs decreased $66,000, or 6.7%, as staff costs were lower due to staff reductions and open positions. Federal deposit insurance assessments were $43,000 lower due to lower rates that went into effect April 1, 2011. These declines were partially offset by increases in professional fees and provision for losses on and cost of real estate acquired through foreclosure~~. Professional~~ ~~fees were $69,000,~~ or ~~50%, higher due to legal costs associated with increased foreclosure activity~~repossession. ~~The provision for losses on and cost of real estate acquired through foreclosure increased $34,000 to $64,000 in the current quarter from $30,000 in the previous year’s quarter.~~

~~Income~~Refer ~~Taxes. Income~~to ~~tax~~Note ~~expense was zero versus a tax expense of $62,000 (or 36.~~7% of ~~pre-tax income) for~~ the ~~three~~Consolidated ~~month~~Financial Statements ~~periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Income tax expense was zero in the current quarter as the Company fully reserved~~ for ~~its deferred tax asset as of June 30, 2011. Accordingly, taxes on the current quarter’s earnings were offset by~~ a ~~reversal~~discussion of ~~the~~troubled ~~related~~debt ~~portion of this reserve~~restructurings.

~~Liquidity~~The ~~and~~following ~~Capital~~table ~~Resources~~reflects the activity in non-performing loans for the six months ended December 31, 2011:

An important component of the Company's asset/liability structure is the level of liquidity available to meet the needs of customers and creditors. The Company's Asset/Liability Management Committee has established general guidelines for the maintenance of prudent levels of liquidity. The Committee continually monitors the amount and source of available liquidity, the time to acquire it and its cost. Management of the Company seeks to maintain a relatively high level of liquidity in order to retain flexibility in terms of investment opportunities and deposit pricing. Because liquid assets generally provide lower rates of return, the Company's relatively high liquidity will, to a certain extent, result in lower rates of return on assets.

(in thousands)
Balance June 30, 2011	$	9,946
Added to non-accrual during the year to date		6,653
Paid off/down		(1,132	)
Brought to accrual status		(267	)
Transferred to real estate acquired through foreclosure		(998	)
Charged-Off		(763	)
Net change in non-accrual Consumer & Residential Mortgages, and all other		36
Balance December 31, 2011	$	13,475

~~The~~At ~~Company's~~December ~~most~~31, ~~liquid~~2011, ~~assets~~non-accrual construction ~~are~~loans ~~cash~~totaled on$3.3 ~~hand~~million and ~~due~~consisted ~~from~~of ~~banks,~~a ~~interest-bearing~~$1.2 ~~deposits~~million ~~and~~commercial ~~Federal~~land ~~funds~~development ~~sold~~loan, ~~which~~$1.6 ~~are~~residential ~~short-term,~~development loan ~~highly~~and ~~liquid~~a ~~investments~~$564,000 ~~with~~residential ~~original~~land ~~maturities~~development ofloan. ~~less~~Non-accrual ~~than~~commercial ~~three~~real ~~months~~estate ~~that~~loans ~~are~~include ~~readily~~a ~~convertible to known amounts of cash~~$1.8 ~~The~~million ~~levels~~strip ofshopping center ~~these assets are dependent on the Company's operating~~loan, ~~financing~~$1.3 ~~and~~million ~~investing~~in ~~activities~~residential ~~during~~investment ~~any given period. At September 30~~loans, ~~2011~~$862,000 ~~the~~warehouse ~~Company's~~building ~~cash~~loan, ~~on hand~~ and ~~due from banks and interest-bearing deposits totaled~~ $~~23.6 million. In addition~~782,000 ~~the~~in ~~Company~~mixed ~~has~~use ~~approximately~~commercial mortgage ~~$38~~loans.9 ~~million~~Non-accrual ofcommercial ~~investment~~loans ~~securities~~include ~~classified~~a ~~as available for sale,~~ $~~15.~~1.9 million ofloan ~~which~~supporting ~~are~~a ~~pledged~~borrower’s asvarious ~~collateral~~business atinterests including ~~the~~commercial ~~Federal~~properties ~~Reserve Bank’s discount window~~ and a $62.31 million ofmixed ~~which~~use ~~are~~industrial ~~pledged~~property ~~as collateral for the Company’s federal funds line of credit~~loan.

The Company anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current loan commitments of $10.3 million and unused lines of credit of $9.4 million. Certificates of deposit that are scheduled to mature in less than one year at September 30, 2011 totaled $40.5 million. Historically, a high percentage of maturing deposits have remained with the Company.32

Noninterest Income. The Company'’s ~~primary~~non-interest ~~sources~~income consists of ~~funds~~deposit ~~are~~fees, ~~deposits~~service ~~and~~charges, ~~proceeds~~income from ~~maturing~~bank ~~investment~~owned life ~~securities~~insurance (“BOLI”) and ~~mortgage-backed~~gains. ~~securities~~Total ~~and~~non-interest ~~principal~~income ~~and~~increased ~~interest~~by ~~payments~~$4,000, onor ~~loans~~2.2%, ~~While~~to ~~maturities~~$185,000 ~~and~~in ~~scheduled~~the ~~amortization~~three month period ended December 31, 2011 as the prior year’s quarter included $16,000 in net losses on the sale of ~~mortgage-backed~~assets. ~~securities~~Fees and ~~loans~~service ~~are~~charges ~~predictable~~decreased ~~sources~~$10,000 during this period as fees from the Company’s leasing business declined due to the run-off of ~~funds,~~that ~~deposit~~portfolio. ~~flows~~For ~~and~~the ~~mortgage~~six ~~prepayments~~months ~~are~~ended ~~greatly~~December ~~influenced~~31, by2011, ~~general~~total non-interest ~~rates,~~income ~~economic~~was ~~conditions~~$12,000 higher ~~competition~~consistent ~~and~~with ~~other~~the ~~factors~~quarterly increase.

~~The~~Noninterest Expenses. Total ~~Company~~non-interest expenses increased by $40,000, asor ~~the~~2.1%, ~~holding~~to ~~company~~$1.91 million for the ~~Bank~~quarter ended December 31, ~~has~~2011 anfrom ~~annual~~$1.87 ~~cash~~million ~~requirement~~for ofthe ~~approximately~~quarter ~~$654~~ended December 31,~~000~~ ~~for~~2010. ~~the~~Compensation ~~payment~~costs decreased of$59,000, ~~preferred~~or ~~dividends~~6.2%, as ~~well~~staff ~~as,~~costs ~~interest~~were ~~payments~~lower ondue ~~the~~to staff reductions and open positions. Federal deposit insurance assessments were $547,000 lower due to lower rates that went into effect April 1, 2011.0 ~~million~~These declines were partially offset by increases in professional ~~junior~~fees ~~subordinated~~and ~~debentures.~~provision ~~The~~for ~~only~~losses ~~source~~on and cost of ~~funds~~real ~~for~~estate ~~the~~acquired ~~holding~~through ~~company~~foreclosure. isProfessional ~~dividends~~fees ~~from~~were ~~the~~$104,000, or ~~Bank~~66%, higher due to legal costs associated with increased foreclosure activity and collection activity. The ~~amount~~provision for losses on and cost of ~~dividends~~real ~~that~~estate ~~can~~acquired bethrough ~~paid~~foreclosure increased $29,000, 47%, to $91,000 in the ~~holding~~current ~~company~~quarter from $62,000 in the ~~Bank~~previous isyear’s ~~limited~~quarter bydue to increased foreclosure activity. For the ~~earnings~~six ofmonths ended December 31, 2011, non-interest expenses were only $18,000, or 0.5%, higher than compared to the ~~Bank~~prior period. Similar trends in the current quarter were prevalent in the six month period.

OnIncome ~~May~~Taxes. 6,Income ~~2010,~~tax ~~the~~expense was ~~Company’s~~zero ~~Board~~versus ofa ~~Directors~~tax ~~determined~~benefit toof ~~suspend~~$231,000 ~~regular~~(or ~~quarterly~~39.9% ~~cash~~of ~~dividends~~pre-tax onincome) for the ~~$6.0~~three ~~million~~month inperiods ~~Series~~ended ADecember ~~Preferred~~31, ~~Stock~~2011 and ~~$300~~ 2010,~~000~~ inrespectively. ~~Series~~For Bthe ~~Preferred~~six ~~Stock. The~~month ~~Company’s~~ended ~~Board~~December of31, ~~Directors~~2011, ~~took~~income ~~this~~tax ~~action~~expense inwas ~~consultation~~zero ~~with~~versus ~~the~~a ~~Federal~~tax ~~Reserve~~benefit ~~Bank~~of $169,000 (or 41.1% of ~~Richmond~~pre-tax asincome) ~~required~~for bythe ~~recent~~same ~~regulatory~~period ~~policy~~in ~~guidance~~the prior year. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Income ~~currently~~tax ~~has~~expense ~~sufficient~~was ~~capital~~zero in the current three and ~~liquidity~~six tomonth periods ~~pay~~as the ~~scheduled~~Company ~~dividends~~fully onreserved ~~the~~for ~~preferred~~its ~~stock;~~deferred ~~however~~tax asset as of December 31, ~~the~~2011 ~~Company~~and ~~believes~~June ~~this~~30, ~~decision~~2011. ~~will~~Accordingly, ~~better~~the ~~support~~tax benefit on the ~~capital~~net ~~position~~loss offor ~~The~~three ~~Patapsco~~and ~~Bank~~six months ended December 31, a2011 ~~wholly~~was ~~owned~~offset ~~subsidiary~~by ofa ~~the~~similar ~~Company~~reserve.

OnLiquidity May 6, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors determined to suspend interest payments on the trust preferred securities. The Company’s Board of Directors took this action in consultation with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond as required by recent regulatory policy guidance. The Company currently has sufficient capital and ~~liquidity~~Capital ~~to pay the scheduled interest payments; however, the Company believes this decision will better support the capital position of The Patapsco Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.~~Resources

31An important component of the Company's asset/liability structure is the level of liquidity available to meet the needs of customers and creditors. The Company's Asset/Liability Management Committee has established general guidelines for the maintenance of prudent levels of liquidity. The Committee continually monitors the amount and source of available liquidity, the time to acquire it and its cost. Management of the Company seeks to maintain a relatively high level of liquidity in order to retain flexibility in terms of investment opportunities and deposit pricing. Because liquid assets generally provide lower rates of return, the Company's relatively high liquidity will, to a certain extent, result in lower rates of return on assets.

~~Under~~The ~~the~~Company's ~~terms~~most ofliquid assets ~~its~~are ~~trust~~cash ~~preferred~~on ~~securities~~hand and ~~its~~due ~~Series~~from Abanks, interest-bearing deposits and ~~Series~~Federal Bfunds ~~preferred~~sold, ~~stock~~which are short-term, ~~while~~highly itliquid investments ~~has~~with ~~deferred~~original ~~dividends~~maturities of less than three months that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash. The levels of these assets are dependent on the ~~trust~~Company's ~~preferred~~operating, ~~securities~~financing and ~~suspended~~investing ~~dividends~~activities during any given period. At December 31, 2011, the Company's cash on ~~its~~hand ~~Series~~and Adue from banks and ~~Series~~interest-bearing Bdeposits ~~preferred~~totaled ~~stock~~$19.5 million. In addition, the itCompany ~~generally~~has ~~may~~approximately ~~not~~$42.3 ~~declare~~million orof ~~pay~~investment ~~any~~securities ~~dividends~~classified oras ~~distributions~~available onfor sale, or$21.2 ~~repurchase,~~million ~~its~~of ~~common~~which ~~stock~~are pledged as collateral at the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window and $4.5 million of which are pledged as collateral for the Company’s federal funds line of credit.

The ~~Bank~~Company ~~had~~anticipates that ~~$66.1~~it ~~million~~will inhave ~~borrowing~~sufficient ~~capacity~~funds ~~with~~available ~~the~~to ~~Federal~~meet ~~Home~~its ~~Loan~~current ~~Bank~~loan commitments of ~~Atlanta, with~~ $910.08 million inand ~~borrowings~~unused ~~outstanding,~~lines atof ~~September~~credit ~~30,~~of $9.1 ~~2011~~million. ~~These~~ ~~borrowings~~Certificates ~~are secured by the Bank’s stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank~~ of ~~Atlanta~~deposit ~~and~~that ~~other~~are ~~eligible~~scheduled ~~assets. In~~to ~~addition,~~mature ~~the Bank has $13.9 million~~ in ~~borrowing~~less ~~capacity~~than atone ~~the~~year ~~Fed’s discount window~~ at ~~September 30~~December 31, 2011~~. And~~ ~~finally,~~totaled ~~the Bank has a~~ $443.04 million. ~~line~~Historically, ofa ~~credit,~~high ~~none~~percentage of ~~which~~maturing ~~was~~deposits ~~outstanding~~have atremained ~~September 30, 2011,~~ with ~~Pacific~~the ~~Coast Bankers Bank~~Company.

AsThe ~~discussed~~Company's inprimary ~~Note~~sources 10of funds are deposits and proceeds from maturing investment securities and mortgage-backed ~~Regulatory~~securities ~~Capital~~and ~~Requirements,~~principal ~~the~~and ~~Bank~~interest payments on loans. While maturities and ~~the~~scheduled ~~holding~~amortization ~~company~~of ~~exceeded~~mortgage-backed ~~all~~securities ~~regulatory~~and ~~minimum~~loans ~~capital~~are ~~requirements~~predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, competition and other factors.

~~Contingencies~~The ~~and~~Company, ~~Off-Balance~~as ~~Sheet~~the ~~Items~~holding company for the Bank, has an annual cash requirement of approximately $654,000 for the payment of preferred dividends, as well as, interest payments on the $5.0 million in junior subordinated debentures. The only source of funds for the holding company is dividends from the Bank. The amount of dividends that can be paid to the holding company from the Bank is limited by the earnings of the Bank.

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk including commitments to extend credit under both new facilities and under existing lines of credit. Commitments to fund loans typically expire after 60 days, commercial lines of credit are subject to annual reviews and home equity lines of credit are generally for a term of 20 years. These instruments contain, to varying degrees, credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.33

~~Off-balance~~On ~~sheet~~May ~~financial~~6, ~~instruments~~2010, ~~whose~~the ~~contract~~Company’s ~~amounts~~Board of ~~represent~~Directors ~~credit~~determined to suspend regular quarterly cash dividends on the $6.0 million in Series A Preferred Stock and ~~interest~~$300,000 in ~~rate~~Series ~~risk~~B ~~are~~Preferred ~~summarized~~Stock. The Company’s Board of Directors took this action in consultation with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond as ~~follows:~~required by recent regulatory policy guidance.

	September 30, 2011		June 30, 2011
(in thousands)
Commitments to originate new loans	$	10,321	$	8,645
Undisbursed lines of credit		9,367		10,230
Financial standby letters of credit		1,421		1,421

On May 6, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors determined to suspend interest payments on the trust preferred securities. The Company’s Board of Directors took this action in consultation with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond as required by recent regulatory policy guidance.

~~Item~~Under ~~3. Quantitative~~the terms of its trust preferred securities and ~~Qualitative~~its ~~Disclosures~~Series ~~About~~A ~~Market~~and ~~Risk~~Series B preferred stock, while it has deferred dividends on the trust preferred securities and suspended dividends on its Series A and Series B preferred stock, it generally may not declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, its common stock.

~~This~~The ~~item~~Bank ishad ~~not~~$63.4 ~~applicable~~million asin borrowing capacity with the ~~Company~~Federal isHome Loan Bank of Atlanta, with $9.0 million in borrowings outstanding, at December 31, 2011. These borrowings are secured by the Bank’s stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and other eligible assets. In addition, the Bank has $20.8 million in borrowing capacity at the Fed’s discount window at December 31, 2011. And finally, the Bank has a ~~smaller~~$4.0 ~~reporting~~million ~~company~~line of credit, none of which was outstanding at December 31, 2011, with Pacific Coast Bankers Bank.

~~Item~~As ~~4. Controls~~discussed in Note 10 - Regulatory Capital Requirements, the Bank and ~~Procedures~~the holding company exceeded all regulatory minimum capital requirements.

~~Disclosure~~Contingencies ~~Controls~~ and ~~Procedures~~Off-Balance Sheet Items

The Company’s ~~management,~~is ~~including~~party ~~the~~to ~~Company’s~~financial ~~principal~~instruments with ~~executive~~off-balance ~~officer~~sheet ~~and~~risk ~~principal~~including ~~financial~~commitments ~~officer,~~to ~~have~~extend ~~evaluated~~credit ~~the~~under ~~effectiveness~~both ofnew ~~the~~facilities ~~Company’s “disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated~~ under ~~the~~existing ~~Securities~~lines ~~Exchange Act~~ of ~~1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”)~~credit. ~~Based~~ Commitments ~~upon~~to ~~their~~fund ~~evaluation,~~loans ~~the~~typically ~~principal~~expire ~~executive~~after ~~officer~~60 ~~and principal financial officer concluded that~~days, ascommercial oflines ~~the end~~ of ~~the~~credit ~~period~~are ~~covered~~subject byto ~~this~~annual ~~report,~~reviews ~~the~~and ~~Company’s~~home ~~disclosure~~equity lines ~~controls~~of ~~and~~credit ~~procedures~~are ~~were~~generally ~~effective~~ for ~~the~~a ~~purpose~~term of ~~ensuring~~20 ~~that~~years. ~~the~~These ~~information~~instruments ~~required~~contain, to bevarying ~~disclosed~~degrees, incredit ~~the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities~~ and ~~Exchange~~interest ~~Commission~~rate ~~(the~~risk in ~~“SEC”)~~excess ~~(1)~~of ~~is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within~~ the ~~time~~amounts ~~periods~~recognized ~~specified~~ in the ~~SEC’s~~consolidated ~~rules~~balance and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosuresheets.

~~Changes~~Off-balance tosheet ~~Internal~~financial ~~Control~~instruments ~~Over~~whose contract ~~Financial~~amounts ~~Reporting~~represent credit and interest rate risk are summarized as follows:

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

	December 31, 2011		June 30, 2011
(in thousands)
Commitments to originate new loans	$	10,752	$	8,645
Undisbursed lines of credit		9,092		10,230
Financial standby letters of credit		1,288		1,421

32Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

~~Part~~This ~~II. OTHER~~item ~~INFORMATION~~is not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 14. ~~Legal~~Controls ~~Proceedings~~and Procedures

~~None.~~Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~Item~~The 1ACompany’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). ~~Risk~~Based ~~Factors~~upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

For information regarding the Company's risk factors, see Item 1A in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.34

~~Item~~Changes 2.to ~~Unregistered~~Internal Control ~~Sales~~Over ofFinancial ~~Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~Reporting

~~None~~There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three and six months ended December 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~35

~~None~~Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 41. ~~Removed~~Legal ~~and Reserved~~Proceedings

~~Not applicable~~None.

Item 51A. ~~Other~~Risk ~~Information~~Factors

~~None~~For information regarding the Company's risk factors, see Item 1A in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.

Item 62. ~~Exhibits~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~(a) Exhibits~~None.

~~The~~Item ~~following~~3. ~~exhibits~~Defaults ~~are~~Upon ~~filed~~Senior ~~herewith:~~Securities

Exhibit Number		Title
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Articles Supplementary (1)
3.2		Bylaws of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc., as amended (2)
4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (3)
4.2		Articles Supplementary establishing Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (4)
4.3		Form of stock certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (4)
4.4		Form of warrant to purchase 300.003 shares of common stock of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (4)
4.5		Articles Supplementary establishing Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B, of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (4)
4.6		Form of stock certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (4)
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act
101*		The following materials from Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) related Notes, tagged as blocks of text.

None

~~(1)~~Item ~~Incorporated~~4. ~~herein~~Mine bySafety ~~reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 0-28032).~~Disclosures

~~(2)~~Not ~~Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event on July 23, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 25, 2008 (File No~~applicable. ~~0-28032).~~

~~(3)~~Item ~~Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No~~5. ~~0-28032).~~Other Information

~~(4) Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event on December 18, 2008, filed with the SEC on December 23, 2008 (File No. 0-28032).~~None

*Item ~~Furnished, not filed~~6. Exhibits

33(a) Exhibits

~~Signatures~~The following exhibits are filed herewith:

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit Number		Title

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Articles Supplementary (1)
3.2		Bylaws of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc., as amended (2)
4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (3)
4.2		Articles Supplementary establishing Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (4)
4.3		Form of stock certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (4)
4.4		Form of warrant to purchase 300.003 shares of common stock of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (4)
4.5		Articles Supplementary establishing Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B, of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (4)
4.6		Form of stock certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (4)
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act
101*		The following materials from Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) related Notes, tagged as blocks of text.

	PATAPSCO BANCORP, INC.
Date: November 14, 2011
	/s/ Michael J. Dee
	Michael J. Dee
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.
	William C. Wiedel, Jr.
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(1)

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 0-28032).

34(2) Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event on July 23, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 25, 2008 (File No. 0-28032).

(3)

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 0-28032).

(4)

Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event on December 18, 2008, filed with the SEC on December 23, 2008 (File No. 0-28032).

Furnished, not filed.

Signatures

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PATAPSCO BANCORP, INC.

Date: February 13, 2012
	/s/ Michael J. Dee
	Michael J. Dee
	President and Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.
	William C. Wiedel, Jr.
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Filing Compare · PATAPSCO BANCORP INC