UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number

000-24816

NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	23-2610414
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

230 S. Broad Street, Mezzanine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (215)790-4700

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on
	which registered
None	N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨		Accelerated Filer ¨

Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

Aggregate Market Value of Voting and Non-Voting Common Equity Held by non-affiliates of the Registrant: N/A

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part I	Part II	Part III	Part IV
(None)	(None)	(None)	Exhibits from Form 10
			Registration Statement filed on July 14, 1994;
			Form 10-K Annual Reports filed on April 1, 1996 and March 31, 2003;
			and Form 10-Q Quarterly Report;
			November 11, 2003 -
			Commission file Number 0-24816.

INDEX

			Page		~~Page~~
PART I
Item 1.	Business	~~Business~~
			I.	Summary	1
		I. Summary	1
			II.	NPAMLP Objectives and Policies	2
		II. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies	2
			III.	Glossary	4
		III. Glossary	4
Item 1(A).	Risk Factors	~~Risk Factors~~	6		7
Item 1(B).	Unresolved Staff Comments	~~Unresolved Staff Comments~~	6		7
Item 2.	Properties	~~Properties~~	6		7
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	~~Legal Proceedings~~	12		14
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	~~Removed and Reserved~~	12		14
PART II
Item 5.	Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	~~Market for the Registrant's Common~~	13
			Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
		I. No Trading Market	13
			Purchases of Equity Securities		15
		II. Distributions of Cash Flow From Operations	13
			I.	No Trading Market	15
		III. Proceeds of Sales Distributions	13
			II.	Distributions of Cash Flow From Operations	15
		IV. Certain Income Tax Considerations	13
			III.	Proceeds of Sales Distributions	15
		V. Other	14
			IV.	Certain Income Tax Considerations	15
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		14
			V.	Other	16
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		14
Item 6.		Selected Financial Data			16
		I. Liquidity and Capital Resources	14
Item 7.		Management's Discussion and Analysis of
		II. Critical Accounting Policies	16
			Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
		III. Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations	17
			I.	Liquidity and Capital Resources	16
		IV. Results of Operations	17
			II.	Critical Accounting Policies	18
		V. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations	18
			III.	Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations	19
		VI. Indebtedness Secured by the Properties	18
			IV.	Results of Operations	20
Item 7(A)	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		21
			V.	Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations	21
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		21
			VI.	Indebtedness Secured by the Properties	21
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		21
Item 7(A)		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
Item 9(A)	Controls and Procedures		22
			About Market Risk		24
Item 9(B)	Other Information		22
Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			24
PART III
Item 9.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		23
			Accounting and Financial Disclosure		24
		I. Summary	23
Item 9(A)		Controls and Procedures			24
		II. Code of Ethics	23
Item 9(B)		Other Information			25
		III. Audit Committee Financial Expert	23
PART III
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		23
Item 10.		Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		24
			Governance		26
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence		24
			I.	Summary	26
		I. Compensation and Fees	24
			II.	Code of Ethics	26
		II. Property Management by Affiliate	25
			III.	Audit Committee Financial Expert	26
		III. Conflicts of Interest	25
Item 11.		Executive Compensation			26
		IV. Summary of Relationships	26
Item 12.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
		V. Related Party Transactions	26
			and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		27
		VI. Director Independence	27
Item 13.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services		27
			Director Independence		27
		I. Audit Fees	27
			I.	Compensation and Fees	27
		II. Audit Related Fees	27
			II.	Property Management by Affiliate	28
		III. Tax Fees	27
			III.	Conflicts of Interest	28
		IV. All Other fees	27
			IV.	Summary of Relationships	29
		IV. Pre-approval Policies and Procedures	27
			V.	Related Party Transactions	29
PART IV
			VI.	Director Independence	30
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules		28
Item 14.		Principal Accountant Fees and Services			30
		I. Documents Filed as Part of this Report	28
			I.	Audit Fees	30
SIGNATURES			30
			II.	Tax Fees	30
			III.	All Other Fees	30
			IV.	Pre-approval Policies and Procedures	30
PART IV
Item 15.		Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules			31
			I.	Documents Filed as Part of this Report	31
SIGNATURES					33

Forward-Looking Statements

From time to time, management may provide information or make statements, whether orally or in writing, including certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are deemed to be “forward-looking” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Litigation Reform Act”). These forward-looking statements reflect management’s current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors outside management’s control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.

The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,”, “~~should~~could”, “should” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended or using other similar expressions. Management does not intend to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. In accordance with the provisions of the Litigation Reform Act, we are making ~~the~~our ~~limited~~Limited ~~partners~~Partners aware that such forward-looking statements, because they relate to future events, are by their very nature subject to many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any exhibits to this Form 10-K. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the outcome of litigation and regulatory proceedings to which NPAMLP may be a party; actions of competitors; changes and developments affecting our industry; quarterly or cyclical variations in financial results; the ability to attract and retain tenants at market rates; interest rates and cost of borrowing; management’s ability to maintain and improve cost efficiency of operations; changes in economic conditions, political conditions, and other factors that are set forth in ~~the~~ “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” ~~section~~, ~~the~~ “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” ~~section~~ and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

iii

PART I

Item 1. Business

I. Summary

The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information and financial statements appearing elsewhere in ~~the~~this Annual Report. Reference is made to the Glossary, which appears at the end of this Item for the definition of certain capitalized terms used in the Summary and elsewhere in this Report.

A. The Master Limited Partnership

National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”) was organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act in January, 1990 as part of a consolidation of the operation of properties owned by certain limited partnerships (the “Partnerships”) previously sponsored by National Property Analysts, Inc. and its affiliates (“NPA”). The term of NPAMLP will continue until December 31, 2013, unless sooner ~~terminated~~dissolved in accordance with the terms of the limited partnership agreement of NPAMLP (the “Partnership Agreement”). See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - V. Indebtedness Secured by the Properties - D. Future Interest Agreement.”

NPAMLP's principal executive offices are located at 230 South Broad Street, Mezzanine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 (telephone: 215-790-4700).

B. The General Partners

The General Partners of NPAMLP are EBL&S, Inc., an affiliate of NPA (the “Managing General Partner”) and Feldman International, Inc. (the “Equity General Partner”). The Managing General Partner and the Equity General Partner are collectively referred to as the “General Partners”. The Managing General Partner manages and controls all aspects of the business of NPAMLP. The Managing General Partner is owned 100% by E & H Properties, Inc., an affiliate of NPA and holds no ownership interest in NPAMLP. The Equity General Partner holds a 1% general partner interest in NPAMLP. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

C. The Properties and Indebtedness Secured by the Properties

NPAMLP owns 24 properties, inclusive of tenant-in-common (“TIC”) interests, as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, which consist primarily of shopping centers and free standing, single tenant retail stores (the “Properties”). The Properties are subject to certain indebtedness, which was incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Properties by the Partnerships. See “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

D. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies

NPAMLP intends to hold the Properties until such time as it is deemed prudent to dispose of the Properties. However, the Partnership in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement will ~~terminate~~dissolve on December 31, 2013. See further discussion under “II. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies”, below; see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - V. Indebtedness Secured by the Properties - D. Future Interest Agreement.”

E. Limited Partners' Share of Cash Flow from Operations

The Limited Partners will receive, on an annual basis, 99% of the Cash Flow from Operations as defined in the Partnership Agreement. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute Cash Flow from Operations to its partners in the foreseeable future.

F. Limited Partners' Share of Proceeds of Sales Distributions

Proceeds of Sales of the Properties available to be distributed by NPAMLP will be distributed 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the Equity General Partner. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute Proceeds of Sales of the Properties to its partners in the foreseeable future.

1G. Allocations of Profits and Losses

GTaxable income from NPAMLP operations or from a capital transaction will be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the Equity General Partner. ~~Allocations~~ Taxable oflosses ~~Profits~~from NPAMLP operations or from capital transactions generally have been allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% ~~Losses~~to the Equity General Partner.

~~Taxable income from NPAMLP operations or from a capital transaction will be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and~~ 1~~% to the Equity General Partner. Taxable losses from NPAMLP operations or from capital transactions generally have been allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the Equity General Partner.~~

H. Compensation to the General Partner and Affiliates

The Managing General Partner will receive certain compensation for its services including reimbursement of certain of its expenses and the Equity Partner will receive a portion of Cash Flow from Operations and Proceeds of Sales of the Properties. An affiliate of the Managing General Partner will receive a management fee for managing the Properties and a leasing fee for obtaining or renewing leases. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related ~~Party~~ Transactions, Director Independence - I. Compensation and Fees.”

I. Fiscal Year

NPAMLP's fiscal year begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year.

II. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies

A. NPAMLP Objectives

NPAMLP intends to hold the Properties until such time as it is deemed prudent to dispose of one or more or all of the Properties. The precise timing of disposition of Properties is at the discretion of the Managing General Partner. However, the Partnership in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement is expected to ~~terminate~~dissolve not later than December 31, 2013. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - V. Indebtedness Secured by the Properties - D. Future Interest Agreement.”

It is anticipated that the forgiveness of Wrap Mortgages, if any, and the process of selling Properties, which are owned by Unaudited Partnerships, and applying sales proceeds to make payments on the Wrap Mortgages will result in the Limited Partners having to report substantial taxable income when the Properties are sold without the corresponding receipt of any cash proceeds therefrom (unless and until the Threshold Amount has been exceeded). The Consolidation and Restructuring was intended to avoid a foreclosure of Properties and to preserve for Limited Partners the potential for deriving an economic benefit from the future sales of the Properties, while at the same time possibly deferring the recognition of taxable income for some Limited Partners.

The objectives of NPAMLP are to implement effective management, leasing, cost control and capital improvement policies and techniques with respect to the Properties, to: (i) preserve and protect NPAMLP's Properties in order to avoid the loss of any Properties to foreclosure; (ii) enhance the potential for appreciation in the value of NPAMLP's Properties; and (iii) eventually provide Cash Flow from Operations. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute Cash Flow from Operations to its partners in the foreseeable future.

The determination of whether a Property should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made by the Managing General Partner after consideration of relevant factors, including performance of the Property, market conditions, the financial requirements of NPAMLP and the tax consequences to Limited Partners, with a view toward achieving the principal investment objectives of NPAMLP. In connection with a sale of a Property, a purchase money obligation secured by a mortgage may be taken as part payment; there are no limitations or restrictions on NPAMLP's taking such purchase money obligations. The terms of payment to NPAMLP are affected by custom in the area in which each Property is located and the then-prevailing economic conditions. To the extent the Partnership receives notes and other property instead of cash on sales, such proceeds (other than any interest payable thereon) will not be included in Proceeds of Sales of the Properties until and to the extent the notes or other property are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of; and therefore, the distribution of such proceeds to NPAMLP may be delayed until such time.

2NPAMLP may not acquire additional properties. However, in the Managing General Partner's discretion, NPAMLP may, in appropriate circumstances, exchange Properties for new properties in transactions structured to be non-taxable events in whole or in substantial part under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, and the proceeds of an involuntary conversion may be invested in property in transactions structured to be non-taxable in whole or in part under Section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code.

~~NPAMLP may not acquire additional properties~~B. ~~However,~~ inCompetition ~~the Managing General Partner's discretion, NPAMLP may, in appropriate circumstances, exchange Properties~~ for new properties in transactions structured to be non-taxable events in whole or in substantial part under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, and the proceeds of an involuntary conversion may be invested in property in transactions structured to be non-taxable in whole or in part under Section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code.Tenants

BNPAMLP's Properties consist primarily of shopping centers and freestanding, single tenant retail stores located in 14 states. ~~Competition~~ ~~for~~Of the 24 properties owned by NPAMLP, 14 properties have only 1 or 2 tenants (“Single Tenant Properties”). The tenants in the Single Tenant Properties are primarily national retailers or supermarkets (“Anchor Tenants”). The 10 remaining properties are multi-tenant shopping center properties (“Shopping Center Properties”). The tenants in the Shopping Center Properties generally include Anchor Tenants and a variety of tenants occupying less substantial portions of the property (“Local Tenants”).

~~NPAMLP's Properties consist primarily of shopping centers and freestanding, single tenant retail stores located in 14 states. Of the 24 properties owned by NPAMLP, 14 properties have only 1 or~~ 2 tenants (“Single Tenant Properties”). The tenants in the Single Tenant Properties are primarily national retailers or supermarkets (“Anchor Tenants”). The 10 remaining properties are multi-tenant shopping center properties (“Shopping Center Properties”). The tenants in the Shopping Center Properties generally include Anchor Tenants and a variety of tenants occupying less substantial portions of the property (“Local Tenants”).

1. Anchor Tenants

The Anchor Tenant leases at lease inception are usually for 15 to 25 years. At December 31, ~~2010~~2011, NPAMLP had ~~127~~211,847 square feet, or 610% of its total gross leasable area, of vacant Anchor Tenant spaces. The Anchor Tenant leases are at various stages of maturity. Upon expiration of the initial lease term, renewal options are usually available to the Anchor Tenants. See "Item 2. Properties." The high concentration of minimum rent received from Anchor Tenants under the terms of long term leases generally provide NPAMLP with protection against a significant reduction in rental income; however, this also restricts the growth opportunity for NPAMLP.

NPAMLP's primary Anchor Tenants are Sun Microsystems, Sears Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Sears”) and CVS Corporation (“CVS”), which in ~~2010~~2011 accounted for approximately 2526%, 17% and 14%, respectively, of the rental income received by NPAMLP. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, NPAMLP had 1 lease with Sun Microsystems for approximately 250,000 square feet. The rent per square foot for the Sun Microsystems lease as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, was $50.57. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, no balance was due from Sun Microsystems under its lease. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, NPAMLP had 6 leases with Sears aggregating approximately 620,000 square feet. NPAMLP’s average rent per square foot for all of the Sears leases as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, was $3.31. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, ~~approximately~~there ~~$84,000~~ was no balance due from Sears under ~~three~~any ~~(3)~~ of its leases. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, NPAMLP had 5 leases with CVS aggregating approximately 57,000 square feet. NPAMLP’s average rent per square foot for all of the CVS leases as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, was $31.22. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, there was $2,000 due from CVS under one of its leases.

The Managing General Partner has had periodic discussions with representatives of Sears to review and discuss with them their plans for the various Sears stores. In the past, in instances where Sears stores were determined to be undersized and inadequate to accommodate Sears’ current needs, expansions of the existing facilities were undertaken wherever possible. Management is currently unaware of any plans of Sears, or any of its other Anchor Tenants, to expand or close any of their stores owned by NPAMLP, although there can be no assurance that Sears, or any other Anchor Tenant, will not close stores in the future.

2. Local Tenants

Marketing of Local Tenant space is accomplished through signage, direct mailing, advertisements and through coordinated listings with local leasing brokers.

The NPAMLP Properties' occupancy rate for Local Tenant space is 70% at December 31, ~~2010~~2011. The lease terms for Local Tenant space typically range from 1 to 3 years. The competitive conditions applicable to Local Tenant space vary from Property to Property. However, as a general matter, it can be said that the market for Local Tenant space is highly competitive and, with respect to NPAMLP Properties, is typically a function of NPAMLP's rental rates as compared to the local market. However, in instances where a multi-tenant Property has Anchor Tenant space and the Anchor Tenant space is vacant (at December 31, ~~2010~~2011, ~~two~~three Shopping Center Properties have Anchor Tenant space which is vacant), the vacancy in the Anchor Tenant space makes the rental of the Local Tenant space more difficult.

3C. Prohibited Activities and Investments

CNPAMLP does not engage in any business not related to the operations of the Properties. ~~Prohibited~~ ~~Activities~~Additionally, NPAMLP does not: (i) sell additional limited partnership interests in NPAMLP; (ii) issue limited partnership interests in exchange for property; (iii) issue senior securities or make loans or investments in real estate mortgages other than in connection with a contemplated purchase or sale or disposition of the Properties; (iv) make loans to the General Partners or its affiliates; (v) invest in or underwrite the securities of other issuers for any purpose, including investing in securities for the purpose of exercising control; (vi) operate in such a manner as not to be exempt from classification as an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940; (vii) purchase or lease any property from or sell or lease any property to the General Partners or its affiliates, except that with respect to leases, the General Partners and ~~Investments~~its affiliates may lease space in the Properties on terms no more favorable than those offered to non-affiliated persons; (viii) invest in junior mortgages or deeds of trust, except that the acquisition or granting of junior mortgages or deeds of trust in connection with the sale, purchase, financing or refinancing of a Property shall not be deemed to be investing in junior mortgages or deeds of trust; (ix) commingle the funds of NPAMLP with any other person; (x) invest in limited partnership interests; (xi) construct or develop properties; (xii) enter into joint venture agreements; or (xiii) receive rebates or give-ups in connection with NPAMLP.

NPAMLP does not engage in any business not related to the operations of the Properties. Additionally, NPAMLP does not: (i) sell additional limited partnership interests in NPAMLP; (ii) issue limited partnership interests in exchange for property; (iii) issue senior securities or make loans or investments in real estate mortgages other than in connection with a contemplated purchase or sale or disposition of the Properties; (iv) make loans to the General Partners or its affiliates; (v) invest in or underwrite the securities of other issuers for any purpose, including investing in securities for the purpose of exercising control; (vi) operate in such a manner as not to be exempt from classification as an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940; (vii) purchase or lease any property from or sell or lease any property to the General Partners or its affiliates, except that with respect to leases, the General Partners and its affiliates may lease space in the Properties on terms no more favorable than those offered to non-affiliated persons; (viii) invest in junior mortgages or deeds of trust, except that the acquisition or granting of junior mortgages or deeds of trust in connection with the sale, purchase, financing or refinancing of a Property shall not be deemed to be investing in junior mortgages or deeds of trust; (ix) commingle the funds of NPAMLP with any other person's; (x) invest in limited partnership interests; (xi) construct or develop properties; (xii) enter into joint venture agreements; or (xiii) receive rebates or give-ups in connection with NPAMLP.3

D. ~~Insurance~~ Insurance on Properties

NPAMLP has liability insurance covering most of the Properties. The third party liability coverage insures, among others, NPAMLP and the General Partners. Property insurance has also been obtained that insures NPAMLP for fire and other casualty losses in an amount that covers the replacement cost of the covered Properties. NPAMLP does not maintain property and liability insurance on Properties for which the Anchor Tenants are responsible for providing such insurance. In addition, NPAMLP is covered under fidelity insurance policies in amounts that the Managing General Partner deems sufficient. Such insurance coverage is reviewed at least annually and adjusted to account for variations in value.

III. Glossary

“Capital Improvement” shall mean any improvement to any Property that is required to be capitalized or amortized by NPAMLP, pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

“Capital Improvement Debt” shall mean indebtedness incurred by NPAMLP for Capital Improvements.

“Cash Flow from Operations” shall mean, with respect to NPAMLP, Operating Revenues less Operating Cash Expenses and Reserves.

“Consolidation” shall mean the consolidation of the ownership and operations of the Properties in NPAMLP.

“Debt Service” shall mean the aggregate principal and interest payments required on the Third Party Underlying Obligations in calendar year 1990 with respect to the Properties owned by NPAMLP.

“Equity General Partner” shall mean Feldman International, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

“Excess Proceeds” shall mean the Proceeds of Sales of the Properties in excess of the Minimum Payoff Amount and Capital Improvement Debt.

4“General Partners” shall mean EBL&S, Inc., the Managing General Partner of NPAMLP and Feldman International, Inc., the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP.

“~~General~~Investor Note ~~Partners~~Payments” shall mean ~~EBL&S,~~the ~~Inc.,~~payment ~~the~~by ~~Managing~~Investor ~~General~~Note ~~Partner~~Payors of ~~NPAMLP~~amounts ~~and~~becoming ~~Feldman~~due ~~International,~~on ~~Inc.,~~or ~~the~~after ~~Equity~~June ~~General~~1, ~~Partner~~1989 ofon ~~NPAMLP~~the Investor Notes.

“Investor Note ~~Payments~~Payors” shall mean the ~~payment~~limited bypartners ~~Investor~~of ~~Note~~Partnerships ~~Payors~~who ofmade ~~amounts~~payments ~~becoming~~which became due on or after June 18, 1989 on the Investor Notes.

“Investor Note ~~Payors~~Recovery” shall mean the ~~limited~~Excess ~~partners~~Proceeds ofavailable ~~Partnerships~~for ~~who~~distribution ~~made~~to ~~payments~~NPAMLP ~~which~~after ~~became~~the ~~due~~first on$28 ormillion ~~after~~of ~~June~~Excess Proceeds 8has been retained by NPAMLP, ~~1989~~in onan amount equal to the lesser of the Investor ~~Notes~~Note Payments or $25 million.

“Investor ~~Note Recovery~~ Notes” shall mean the ~~Excess~~promissory ~~Proceeds~~notes ~~available~~executed ~~for~~and ~~distribution~~tendered ~~to NPAMLP after the first $28 million of Excess Proceeds has been retained~~ by ~~NPAMLP,~~Limited inPartners anas ~~amount~~payments ~~equal~~for toa ~~the~~portion ~~lesser~~ of the ~~Investor~~purchase price ~~Note~~of ~~Payments~~their orinterest ~~$25~~in ~~million~~a Partnership.

“~~Investor~~Limited ~~Notes~~Partners” shall mean ~~the~~all ~~promissory~~persons ~~notes~~who ~~executed~~hold ~~and~~limited ~~tendered~~partnership byinterests ~~Limited Partners as payments for a portion of the purchase price of their interest~~ in ~~a Partnership~~NPAMLP.

“~~Limited Partners~~Management Agreement” shall mean ~~all~~the ~~persons~~agreement ~~who~~entered ~~hold~~into ~~limited~~by ~~partnership~~and ~~interests~~between NPAMLP and EBL&S Property Management, Inc. pursuant to which the Property Manager will manage the Properties in consideration of a property management fee (equal to five percent (5%) of NPAMLP's gross operating revenues) and a leasing fee (equal to the fee customarily charged in the geographic areas in which the Properties are located).

“~~Management~~Minimum ~~Agreement~~Payoff Amount” shall mean the ~~agreement~~payment ~~entered~~made ~~into~~ by ~~and between~~ NPAMLP ~~and EBL&S Property Management, Inc.~~ pursuant to ~~which~~ the ~~Property~~Restructuring ~~Manager~~Agreement ~~will~~equal ~~manage~~to the ~~Properties~~sum ~~in consideration~~ of ~~a property management fee~~ (~~equal to five percent (5%~~i) the balance of ~~NPAMLP's~~the ~~gross~~Third ~~operating~~Party ~~revenues)~~Underlying ~~and~~Obligations on a ~~leasing~~Property ~~fee~~on ~~(equal~~January to1, ~~the~~1990 ~~fee~~and ~~customarily~~(ii) ~~charged~~any inprepayment ~~the~~penalties ~~geographic~~or ~~areas in which the Properties are located)~~premiums.

“~~Minimum~~Managing General ~~Payoff Amount~~Partner” shall mean ~~the~~EBL&S, ~~payment~~Inc, ~~made by NPAMLP pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement equal to the sum of (i) the balance of the Third Party Underlying Obligations on~~ a ~~Property~~Delaware ~~on January 1, 1990 and (ii) any prepayment penalties or premiums~~corporation.

“~~Managing General Partner~~MLPG” shall mean ~~EBL&S,~~Main ~~Inc~~Line Pension Group, a Delaware ~~corporation~~limited partnership.

~~“MLPG” shall mean Main Line Pension Group, a Delaware limited partnership.~~4

“NPA” shall mean National Property Analysts, Inc. and the corporations and partnerships now or previously controlled by, related to or affiliated with, directly or indirectly, National Property Analysts, Inc. and Mr. Edward Lipkin, including, but not limited to E & H Properties, Inc., National Property Analysts Management Company, and National Property Management Corp.

“NPAEP” shall mean National Property Analysts Employee Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.

“NPAMLP” shall mean National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.

“Operating Cash Expenses” shall mean the amount of cash paid by NPAMLP for costs and expenses incurred in the ordinary course of its business including, without limitation, (i) Debt Service, (ii) debt service payments on Capital Improvement Debt, (iii) fees paid to the Property Manager and (iv) repairs and maintenance, utilities, taxes and certain tenant improvements, employee salaries, travel on NPAMLP business, advertising and promotion, supplies, legal, accounting, statistical or bookkeeping services, and printing and mailing of reports and communications.

“Operating Revenues” shall mean the cash receipts of NPAMLP, other than (i) the proceeds of sales of the Properties and (ii) proceeds of borrowings of NPAMLP, received in cash during NPAMLP’s fiscal year.

“Partnership Agreement” shall mean the limited partnership agreement entered into between the General Partners and the Limited Partners of NPAMLP.

“Partnerships” shall mean certain limited partnerships previously sponsored by NPA.

5“Pension Groups” shall mean the limited partnerships comprised of various pension and profit sharing trusts which sold the Properties to the Partnerships, and includes Main Line Pension Group (“MLPG”), a Delaware limited partnership which acquired the ownership of the Wrap Mortgages from the original holders and NPAEP and PVPG, both Delaware limited partnerships which subsequently acquired ownership of certain Wrap Mortgages from MLPG.

“~~Pension~~Proceeds of ~~Groups~~Sales Distributions” shall mean the ~~limited~~distributions ~~partnerships~~made ~~comprised~~by ofNPAMLP ~~various~~from ~~pension and profit sharing trusts which sold~~ the ~~Properties~~proceeds toof ~~the~~sales ~~Partnerships, and includes Main Line Pension Group (“MLPG”), a Delaware limited partnership which acquired the ownership~~ of the ~~Wrap~~Properties ~~Mortgages~~as ~~from~~defined in the ~~original~~Partnership ~~holders and NPAEP and PVPG, both Delaware limited partnerships which subsequently acquired ownership of certain Wrap Mortgages from MLPG~~Agreement.

“Proceeds of Sales ~~Distributions~~of the Properties” shall mean, ~~the~~for ~~distributions~~purposes ~~made~~of bythe ~~NPAMLP~~Restructuring ~~from~~Agreement, at the ~~proceeds~~time of the calculation thereof, (a) the gross sales proceeds (including the then-outstanding principal amount of indebtedness for borrowed money assumed or taken subject to) from the sale of any Property or Properties asoccurring ~~defined~~and inafter the date the Properties were transferred to NPAMLP, minus (b) all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by a Partnership ~~Agreement~~or a successor to a Partnership (including NPAMLP), in connection with any such sale, including without limitation, brokerage commissions to independent third parties, legal fees and costs, transfer taxes, mortgage taxes, prepayment penalties payable to independent third parties, title insurance and all other customary closing costs and expenses.

“~~Proceeds~~Property” or ~~of Sales of the~~ “Properties” shall mean, ~~for purposes of the Restructuring Agreement~~one, atsome ~~the~~or ~~time~~all of the ~~calculation~~parcels ~~thereof, (a) the gross sales proceeds (including the then-outstanding principal amount~~ of ~~indebtedness~~real ~~for~~property ~~borrowed~~owned ~~money~~by ~~assumed or taken subject to) from the sale of any Property or Properties occurring and after the date the Properties were transferred to~~ NPAMLP, ~~minus~~ (b)inclusive ~~all~~of ~~reasonable costs and expenses incurred by a Partnership or a successor to a Partnership (including NPAMLP),~~ tenant-in connection with any such sale, including without limitation, brokerage commissions to independent third parties, legal fees and costs, transfer taxes, mortgage taxes, prepayment penalties payable to independent third parties, title insurance and all other customary closing costs and expenses-common interests).

“~~Property~~PVPG” ~~or “Properties”~~ shall mean ~~one,~~Penn ~~some~~Valley orPension ~~all~~Group, ofa ~~the~~Delaware ~~parcels~~limited ~~of real property owned by NPAMLP (inclusive of tenant-in-common interests)~~partnership.

“~~PVPG~~Property Manager” shall mean ~~Penn~~EBL&S ~~Valley~~Property ~~Pension Group~~Management, ~~a Delaware limited partnership~~Inc.

“~~Property Manager~~Reserves” shall mean ~~EBL&S~~the ~~Property~~amount ~~Management~~determined by the Managing General Partner, ~~Inc~~in its sole discretion, to be set aside for future requirements of NPAMLP. At the end of each year, any unexpended reserves not continued as Reserves will be treated as Cash Flow from Operations.

“~~Reserves~~Restructuring” shall mean the ~~amount~~restructuring ~~determined~~of by the ~~Managing~~Wrap ~~General~~Mortgages ~~Partner,~~and ~~in its sole discretion, to be set aside for future requirements of NPAMLP. At~~ the ~~end~~Second ~~of each year, any unexpended reserves not continued as Reserves will be treated as Cash Flow from Operations~~Mortgages.

“Restructuring Agreement” shall mean the ~~restructuring~~agreement ofentered into by and between NPAMLP, the Pension Groups and certain NPA affiliates to restructure the Wrap Mortgages and the Second Mortgages.

“~~Restructuring~~Restructured Wrap ~~Agreement~~Mortgages” shall mean the ~~agreement~~Wrap ~~entered~~Mortgages ~~into~~as modified by ~~and between NPAMLP,~~ the ~~Pension~~Restructuring ~~Groups and certain NPA affiliates to restructure the Wrap Mortgages and the Second Mortgages~~Agreement.

~~“Restructured Wrap Mortgages” shall mean the Wrap Mortgages as modified by the Restructuring Agreement.~~5

“Second Mortgage” shall mean any purchase money mortgage or deed of trust created by a Pension Group upon its purchase of a Property that is a subordinate lien against the Property in favor of an NPA affiliate and evidenced by a promissory note.

“Tenant Improvements” shall mean construction to the Properties completed for the benefit of the tenants' use of the Property.

“Third Party Debt Service” shall mean payments of principal and interest on Third Party Underlying Obligations.

“Third Party Underlying Obligations” shall mean those obligations secured by the Property underlying the Wrap Mortgages held by persons or entities other than NPA, or its affiliates.

“Threshold Amount” shall mean payments on the Wrap Mortgages generated by Proceeds of Sales of the Properties in an amount equal to $45,000,000 in excess of the Third Party Underlying Obligations as of January 1, 1990 secured by such Properties. As of December 31, ~~2010~~2011, approximately $36,602,000 had been applied in reduction of the Threshold Amount.

“Unaudited Partnerships” shall mean the Partnerships included in NPAMLP that were not audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

“Units” shall mean units of limited partnership interest in NPAMLP.

6“Wrap Mortgages” shall mean the mortgages securing the Wrap Notes that were delivered to the Pension Groups by the Partnerships at the time of the acquisition of the Property.

“Wrap ~~Mortgages~~Notes” shall mean the ~~mortgages~~promissory ~~securing~~notes ~~the~~secured ~~Wrap Notes that were delivered to the Pension Groups~~ by the ~~Partnerships~~Wrap ~~at the time of the acquisition of the Property~~Mortgages.

~~“Wrap~~Item ~~Notes”~~1 ~~shall~~(A). ~~mean~~Risk ~~the promissory notes secured by the Wrap Mortgages.~~Factors

~~Item~~Not ~~1 (A). Risk Factors~~applicable

~~Not~~Item ~~applicable~~1 (B). Unresolved Staff Comments

~~Item 1 (B). Unresolved Staff Comments~~None

~~None~~Item 2. Properties

~~Item~~NPAMLP's 2. Properties consist primarily of shopping centers and freestanding, single tenant retail stores. As of December 31, 2011, NPAMLP owned and

~~NPAMLP's Properties consist primarily of shopping centers and freestanding, single tenant retail stores. As of December 31, 2010, NPAMLP owned and~~ operated 24 Properties located in 14 states, with 5758% of the Properties being Single Tenant Properties and 4342% being Shopping Center Properties.

Set forth below are schedules providing information with respect to the Properties and the indebtedness secured by the Properties. Schedule 1 provides a description of the Properties and certain tenant information. Schedule 2 provides certain information regarding tenant lease expirations through the termination of NPAMLP on December 31, 2013. Schedule 3 provides information regarding the Third Party Underlying Obligations secured by the Properties.

Under applicable law, in certain circumstances, the owner or operator of real property has an obligation to clean up hazardous and toxic substances on the property. This obligation is often imposed without regard to the timing, cause or person responsible for such substances on the property. The presence of such substances on a Property would have an adverse impact on the operating costs and sale or refinancing of such Property. None of the Properties are presently the subject of any environmental enforcement actions under any such statutes, and the General Partners do not have any information or knowledge about the presence of such substances requiring remediation on any of the Properties. If it is claimed or determined that such substances do exist on any of such Properties, NPAMLP could be subject to such cleanup obligations. There can be no assurance that hazardous or toxic substances will not be discovered on one or more Properties in the future, or that NPAMLP will not incur environmental clean-up or remediation costs in the future, including in connection with environmental assessments and investigations performed in connection with any future sale of properties. ~~The~~ The presence of such substances may make a Property unmarketable or substantially decrease its value. Any environmental cleanup expenses incurred in connection with a sale would directly reduce proceeds derived from the sale of the Property.

Schedule 1

Description of Property Tenant Information
						Total		Average
Property	Total		Occupancy			Minimum		Rent
Location	GLA (a)		Rate			Rent (b)		PSF (c)
Cottage Grove, MN		114,609		82.0	%	$	843,271	$	7.11
Dunmore, PA		26,475		100.0	%		78,696		2.97
East Haven, CT		52,852		42.4	%		280,500		5.31
Federal Way, WA		37,560		100.0	%		45,000		1.20
Grand Rapids, MI		10,880		100.0	%		378,071		34.75
Huntsville, AL		104,000		100.0	%		244,400		2.35
Independence, MO		134,634		96.3	%		367,482		2.73
Kalamazoo, MI		120,958		5.1	%		50,556		0.42
Lake Mary, FL		107,400		100.0	%		859,200		8.00
Lawnside, NJ		102,552		100.0	%		548,078		5.34
Lawndale, CA		14,813		100.0	%		324,024		21.87
Marquette, MI		248,256		92.4	%		1,168,697		4.71
Maryville, MO		35,179		100.0	%		124,264		3.53
North Augusta, SC		109,134		95.3	%		354,700		3.43
O' Fallon, MO		91,061		97.8	%		344,354		3.78
Oak Lawn, IL		159,233		100.0	%		1,116,834		7.01
Philadelphia, PA		128,006		100.0	%		506,500		3.96
Painesville, OH		10,125		100.0	%		188,777		18.64
Rockville, MD (d)		10,880		100.0	%		521,718		58.48
San Jose, CA (e)		249,832		100.0	%		3,019,256		50.57
Seven Hills, OH		121,677		100.0	%		318,595		2.62
Taylorville, IL		43,127		100.0	%		242,419		5.62
Urbana, IL		55,531		18.8	%		66,423		1.20
Waverly, OH		8,834		100.0	%		77,451		8.77

Description of Property Tenant Information

(a) Gross Leasable Area.

Property Location	Total GLA (a)		Occupancy Rate			Total Minimum Rent (b)		Average Rent PSF (c)

Cottage Grove, MN		114,609		78.7	%	$	813,871	$	9.02
Dunmore, PA		26,475		100.0	%		78,696		2.97
East Haven, CT		52,852		42.4	%		303,000		13.53
Federal Way, WA		37,560		100.0	%		45,000		1.20
Grand Rapids, MI		10,880		100.0	%		378,071		34.75
Huntsville, AL		104,000		100.0	%		244,400		2.35
Independence, MO		134,634		96.3	%		386,682		2.92
Kalamazoo, MI		120,958		5.1	%		50,556		8.25
Lake Mary, FL		107,400		100.0	%		912,900		8.50
Lawnside, NJ		102,552		100.0	%		558,409		5.45
Lawndale, CA		14,813		100.0	%		324,024		21.87
Marquette, MI		248,256		92.2	%		1,382,426		6.05
Maryville, MO		35,179		100.0	%		135,326		3.85
North Augusta, SC		109,134		18.3	%		75,000		3.01
O' Fallon, MO		91,061		97.8	%		344,354		3.87
Oak Lawn, IL		159,233		100.0	%		1,116,834		7.01
Philadelphia, PA		128,006		100.0	%		506,500		3.96
Painesville, OH		10,125		100.0	%		188,777		18.64
Rockville, MD (d)		10,880		100.0	%		521,718		58.48
San Jose, CA (e)		249,832		100.0	%		3,234,303		54.17
Seven Hills, OH		121,677		100.0	%		318,595		2.62
Taylorville, IL		43,127		100.0	%		232,609		5.39
Urbana, IL		55,531		18.8	%		66,200		6.34
Waverly, OH		8,834		100.0	%		77,336		8.76

(ba) ~~Based~~Gross onLeasable ~~leases in effect as of December 31, 2010~~Area.

(cb) Based on ~~occupied~~leases ~~space~~in effect as of December 31, 2011.

(dc) ~~NPAMLP~~Based ~~owns~~on anoccupied ~~82% interest in this property~~space. ~~Minimum rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.~~

(ed) NPAMLP owns aan ~~23.9~~82% ~~tenant-in-common~~ interest in this property. Minimum rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

8(e) NPAMLP owns a 23.9% tenant-in-common interest in this property. Minimum rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

~~Schedule 1, Continued~~7

Description of Property Tenant Information

Major Tenant Information

Remaining

Property

Annual

Lease

Tenant

Location

Major Tenant Name

GLA (a)

Rent

Expiration

Options

Cottage Grove, MN

Rainbow Foods

70,130

606,624

07/11/16

6 / 5 YR

Dunmore, PA

Price Chopper

26,475

78,696

11/30/15

1 / 5 YR

East Haven, CT

AutoZone

9,700

153,000

02/28/13

1 / 5 YR

Federal Way, WA

Safeway

37,560

45,000

10/31/13

4 / 5 YR

Grand Rapids, MI

CVS

10,880

378,071

01/31/24

10 / 5 YR

Huntsville, AL

Kmart

104,000

244,400

11/30/15

3 / 5 YR

Independence, MO

Kmart

116,799

308,634

03/31/15

8 / 5 YR

Kalamazoo, MI

None

84,180

Lake Mary, FL

Gander Mountain Sports

107,400

859,200

05/31/21

4 / 5 YR

Lawnside, NJ

Sears

102,552

544,634

09/30/25

10 / 5 YR

Lawndale, CA

CVS

14,813

324,024

05/31/13

10 / 5 YR

Marquette, MI

Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

85,480

170,960

11/30/24

9 / 5 YR

Younker's

44,068

92,543

01/31/18

3 / 5 YR

J.C. Penney

33,996

118,286

02/29/12

3 / 5 YR

Maryville, MO

J.C. Penney

22,060

65,502

10/31/11

1 / 5 YR

North Augusta, SC

Riverfront Antique Mall

103,964

341,256

01/10/11

O' Fallon, MO

Kmart

83,061

279,415

11/30/15

8 / 5 YR

Oak Lawn, IL

Home Depot

104,622

530,000

01/31/28

5 / 5 YR

Jewel Foods

58,575

586,834

01/03/14

1 / 5 YR

Philadelphia, PA

Kmart

91,033

338,500

03/31/12

8 / 5 YR

Supremo Foods

36,973

168,000

06/30/35

None

Painesville, OH

CVS

10,125

188,777

01/31/19

6 / 5 YR

Rockville, MD (b)

CVS

10,880

521,718

01/31/24

10 / 5 YR

San Jose, CA (c)

Sun Microsystems

249,832

3,124,930

05/31/13

2 / 5 YR

Seven Hills, OH

Kmart

121,677

318,595

08/31/12

7 / 5 YR

Taylorville, IL

Grandview Retail Stores

27,958

120,000

03/31/18

None

CVS

10,069

81,319

03/31/12

4 / 5 YR

Urbana, IL

Dollar General

6,264

39,000

10/31/12

None

Waverly, OH

None

N/A

Schedule 1, Continued

~~(a) Gross~~Description ~~Leasable~~of ~~Area~~Property Tenant Information

~~(b) NPAMLP~~Major ~~owns~~Tenant ~~an 82% interest in this property. Annual rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.~~Information

(c) NPAMLP owns a 23.9% tenant-in-common interest in this property. Annual rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

Property
Location

Major Tenant Name

GLA (a)

Annual
Rent

Lease
Expiration

Remaining
Tenant
Options

Cottage Grove, MN

Rainbow Foods

70,130

606,624

07/11/16

6 / 5 YR

Dunmore, PA

Price Chopper

26,475

78,696

11/30/15

1 / 5 YR

East Haven, CT

AutoZone

9,700

153,000

02/28/13

1 / 5 YR

Federal Way, WA

Safeway

37,560

45,000

10/31/13

4 / 5 YR

Grand Rapids, MI

CVS

10,880

378,071

01/31/24

10 / 5 YR

Huntsville, AL

Kmart

104,000

244,400

11/30/15

3 / 5 YR

Independence, MO

Kmart

116,799

308,634

03/31/15

8 / 5 YR

Kalamazoo, MI

None

N/A

Lake Mary, FL

Gander Mountain Sports

107,400

912,900

05/31/21

4 / 5 YR

Lawnside, NJ

Sears

102,552

558,409

09/30/25

10 / 5 YR

Lawndale, CA

CVS

14,813

324,024

05/31/13

10 / 5 YR

Marquette, MI

Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

85,480

170,960

11/30/24

9 / 5 YR

Younker's

44,068

300,000

01/31/18

3 / 5 YR

J.C. Penney

33,996

118,286

02/28/17

3 / 5 YR

Maryville, MO

J.C. Penney

22,060

65,502

10/31/16

1 / 5 YR

North Augusta, SC

None

N/A

O' Fallon, MO

Kmart

83,061

279,415

11/30/15

8 / 5 YR

Oak Lawn, IL

Home Depot

104,622

530,000

01/31/28

5 / 5 YR

Jewel Foods

58,575

586,834

01/03/14

1 / 5 YR

Philadelphia, PA

Kmart

91,033

338,500

03/31/15

8 / 5 YR

Supremo Foods

36,973

168,000

06/30/35

None

Painesville, OH

CVS

10,125

188,777

01/31/19

6 / 5 YR

Rockville, MD (b)

CVS

10,880

521,718

01/31/24

10 / 5 YR

San Jose, CA (c)

Sun Microsystems

249,832

3,234,303

05/31/13

2 / 5 YR

Seven Hills, OH

Kmart

121,677

318,595

08/31/12

7 / 5 YR

Taylorville, IL

Grandview Retail Stores

27,958

120,000

03/31/18

None

CVS

10,069

81,319

03/31/14

4 / 5 YR

Urbana, IL

Dollar General

6,264

39,000

10/31/12

None

Waverly, OH

None

N/A

~~N/A~~(a) ~~- Not~~Gross ~~Applicable~~Leasable ~~– no anchor space at this location.~~Area

9(b) NPAMLP owns an 82% interest in this property. Annual rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

~~Schedule~~(c) 2NPAMLP owns a 23.9% tenant-in-common interest in this property. Annual rent amount reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

Tenant Lease Expirations
					2011								2012
			Total
Property	Total		Minimum		# of		Minimum						# of		Minimum
Location	GLA (a)		Rent (b)		Tenants		Rent			GLA (a)			Tenants		Rent			GLA (a)
Cottage Grove, MN		114,609	$	843,271
Dunmore, PA		26,475		78,696
East Haven, CT		52,852		280,500
Federal Way, WA		37,560		45,000
Grand Rapids, MI		10,880		378,071
Huntsville, AL		104,000		244,400
Independence, MO		134,634		367,482										2	$	22,848			3,000
Kalamazoo, MI		120,958		50,556
Lake Mary, FL		107,400		859,200
Lawnside, NJ		102,552		544,634
Lawndale, CA		14,813		324,024
Marquette, MI		248,256		1,164,406		7	$	161,819			21,416			8		310,373			44,253
Maryville, MO		35,179		124,264		2		82,064			27,104			1		12			2,450
North Augusta, SC		109,134		354,700
O' Fallon, MO		91,061		344,354		1		34,939			3,000
Oak Lawn, IL		159,233		1,116,834
Philadelphia, PA		128,006		506,500										1		338,500			91,033
Painesville, OH		10,125		188,777
Rockville, MD		10,880		521,718
San Jose, CA		249,832		2,979,459
Seven Hills, OH		121,677		318,595										1		318,595			121,677
Taylorville, IL		43,127		241,519		2		27,000			3,000			1		81,319			10,069
Urbana, IL		55,531		65,913		1		8,100			1,050			2		46,000			7,664
Waverly, OH		8,834		77,396
Totals		2,097,608	$	12,020,069		13	$	313,922			55,572			16	$	1,117,647			280,146
Annual % to Total								2.6	%		2.6	%				9.3	%		13.4	%
Cumulative %								2.6	%		2.6	%				11.9	%		16.0	%

N/A - Not Applicable – no anchor space at this location.

~~(a) Gross Leasable Area.~~8

~~(b)~~Schedule ~~Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2010.~~2

					2012								2013
Property	Total		Minimum		# of		Minimum						# of		Minimum
Location	GLA (a)		Rent (b)		Tenants		Rent			GLA (a)			Tenants		Rent			GLA (a)

Cottage Grove, MN		114,609	$	813,871										1	$	37,899			6,075
Dunmore, PA		26,475		78,696
East Haven, CT		52,852		303,000										1		153,000			9,700
Federal Way, WA		37,560		45,000										1		45,000			37,560
Grand Rapids, MI		10,880		378,071
Huntsville, AL		104,000		244,400
Independence, MO		134,634		386,682		1	$	14,448			1,800			2		63,600			13,635
Kalamazoo, MI		120,958		50,556
Lake Mary, FL		107,400		912,900
Lawnside, NJ		102,552		558,409
Lawndale, CA		14,813		324,024										1		324,024			14,813
Marquette, MI		248,256		1,382,426		8		212,546			10,827			1		56,118			2,840
Maryville, MO		35,179		135,326										1		42,188			5,625
North Augusta, SC		109,134		75,000
O' Fallon, MO		91,061		344,354
Oak Lawn, IL		159,233		1,116,834
Philadelphia, PA		128,006		506,500
Painesville, OH		10,125		188,777
Rockville, MD		10,880		521,718
San Jose, CA		249,832		3,234,303										1		3,347,503			249,832
Seven Hills, OH		121,677		318,595		1		318,595			121,677
Taylorville, IL		43,127		232,609		2		31,560			5,100
Urbana, IL		55,531		66,200		2		46,350			7,664			2		20,525			2,800
Waverly, OH		8,834		77,396

Totals		2,097,608	$	12,295,647		14	$	623,499			147,068			11	$	4,089,857			342,880

Annual % to Total								5.1	%		7.0	%				33.3	%		16.3	%
Cumulative %								5.1	%		7.0	%				38.4	%		23.3	%

~~Schedule~~(a) 2,Gross ~~Continued~~Leasable Area.

Tenant Lease Expirations
					2013
			Total
Property	Total		Minimum		# of		Minimum
Location	GLA (a)		Rent (b)		Tenants		Rent			GLA (a)
Cottage Grove, MN		114,609	$	833,271		1	$	37,899			6,075
Dunmore, PA		26,475		78,696
East Haven, CT		52,852		280,500		1		147,925			9,700
Federal Way, WA		37,560		45,000		1		45,000			37,560
Grand Rapids, MI		10,880		378,071
Huntsville, AL		104,000		244,400
Independence, MO		134,634		367,482		1		36,000			9,840
Kalamazoo, MI		120,958		50,556
Lake Mary, FL		107,400		859,200
Lawnside, NJ		102,552		544,634
Lawndale, CA		14,813		324,024
Marquette, MI		248,256		1,164,406		1		53,960			2,840
Maryville, MO		35,179		124,264		1		42,188			5,625
North Augusta, SC		109,134		354,700
O' Fallon, MO		91,061		344,354
Oak Lawn, IL		159,233		1,116,834
Philadelphia, PA		128,006		506,500
Painesville, OH		10,125		188,777
Rockville, MD		10,880		521,718
San Jose, CA		249,832		2,979,459		1		3,347,503			249,832
Seven Hills, OH		121,677		318,595
Taylorville, IL		43,127		241,519
Urbana, IL		55,531		65,913
Waverly, OH		8,834		77,396
Totals		2,097,608	$	12,020,069		7	$	3,710,475			321,472
Annual % to Total								30.9	%		15.3	%
Cumulative %								42.8	%		31.3	%

(b)

Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2011.

~~(a) Gross Leasable Area.~~9

~~(b)~~Schedule ~~Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2010.~~3

11Third Party Underlying Obligations

Schedule 3

Property
Location

Mortgagee

Mortgage
Type

Interest
Rate

Principal
Balance at
12/31/2011

Cottage Grove, MN

IDS Life Insurance

1st

5.55

3,558,346

Dunmore, PA

NONE

East Haven, CT

NONE

Federal Way, WA

NONE

Grand Rapids, MI

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A

1st

7.77

1,724,598

Huntsville, AL

NONE

Independence, MO

NONE

Kalamazoo, MI

NONE

Lake Mary, FL

Citigroup Capital Markets Group

1st

5.67

5,627,996

Lawndale, CA

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

6.04

3,439,306

Lawnside, NJ

Wachovia Securities

1st

8.71

3,439,105

Marquette, MI

Associated Commercial Bank

1st

6.33

4,675,122

Maryville, MO

NONE

North Augusta, SC

NONE

O' Fallon, MO

NONE

Oak Lawn, IL

NONE

Painesville, OH

Credit Suisse First Boston

1st

6.48

1,104,109

Philadelphia, PA

NONE

Rockville, MD (a)

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A

1st

7.77

2,379,987

San Jose, CA (b)

Lehman Ali Inc.

1st

12.50

20,983,031

Seven Hills, OH

B & K Properties

1st

9.75

271,778

Taylorville, IL

NONE

Urbana, IL

NONE

Waverly, OH

NONE

Third Party Underlying Obligations

Principal

Property

Mortgage

Interest

Balance at

Location

Mortgagee

Type

Rate

12/31/2010

Cottage Grove, MN

IDS Life Insurance

1st

5.55

3,720,635

Dunmore, PA

NONE

East Haven, CT

NONE

Federal Way, WA

NONE

Grand Rapids, MI

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

7.77

1,958,698

Huntsville, AL

NONE

Independence, MO

NONE

Kalamazoo, MI

NONE

Lake Mary, FL

Citigroup Capital Markets Group

1st

5.67

5,718,159

Lawndale, CA

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

6.04

3,552,015

Lawnside, NJ

Wachovia Securities

1st

8.71

3,680,466

Marquette, MI

Associated Commercial Bank

1st

6.33

4,773,988

Maryville, MO

NONE

North Augusta, SC

NONE

O' Fallon, MO

NONE

Oak Lawn, IL

NONE

Painesville, OH

Credit Suisse First Boston

1st

6.48

1,217,312

Philadelphia, PA

NONE

Rockville, MD (a)

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

7.77

2,702,903

San Jose, CA (b)

Lehman Ali Inc.

1st

12.50

21,499,639

Seven Hills, OH

B & K Properties

1st

9.75

497,119

Taylorville, IL

NONE

Urbana, IL

NONE

Waverly, OH

NONE

(a) NPAMLP owns an 82% interest in the property. Loan balance reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

(ab) NPAMLP owns ana 8223.9% ~~interest~~tenant-in-common interest in ~~the~~this property. Loan balance reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

~~(b) NPAMLP owns a 23.9% tenant-in-common interest in this property. Loan balance reflects NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.~~10

12Schedule 3, Continued

~~Schedule~~Third 3,Party ~~Continued~~Underlying Obligations

Third Party Underlying Obligations

Property Location

Mortgagee

Mortgage Type

Annual Debt Service

Ownership Interest Fee/ Leasehold

Ownership

Cottage Grove, MN

IDS Life Insurance

1st

364,697

Fee

Annual

Interest

Dunmore, PA

NONE

Leasehold

Property

Mortgage

Debt

Fee/

East Haven, Ct

NONE

Fee

Location

Mortgagee

Type

Service

Leasehold

Federal Way, WA

NONE

Fee

Cottage Grove, MN

IDS Life Insurance

1st

364,697

Fee

Grand Rapids, MI

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

378,071

Fee

Dunmore, PA

NONE

Leasehold

Huntsville, AL

NONE

Leasehold

East Haven, Ct

NONE

Fee

Independence, MO

NONE

Fee

Federal Way, WA

NONE

Fee

Kalamazoo, MI

NONE

Leasehold

Grand Rapids, MI

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

378,071

Fee

Lake Mary, FL

Citigroup Capital Markets Group

1st

416,520

Fee

Huntsville, AL

NONE

Leasehold

Lawndale, CA

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

324,000

Leasehold

Independence, MO

NONE

Fee

Lawnside, NJ

Wachovia Securities

1st

556,739

Fee

Kalamazoo, MI

NONE

Leasehold

Marquette, MI

Associated Commercial Bank

1st

402,318

Leasehold

Lake Mary, FL

Citigroup Capital Markets Group

1st

416,520

Fee

Maryville, MO

NONE

Leasehold

Lawndale, CA

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

324,000

Leasehold

North Augusta, SC

NONE

Leasehold

Lawnside, NJ

Wachovia Securities

1st

556,739

Fee

O' Fallon, MO

NONE

Fee

Marquette, MI

Associated Commercial Bank

1st

402,318

Leasehold

Oak Lawn, IL

NONE

Leasehold

Maryville, MO

NONE

Leasehold

Painesville, OH

Credit Suisse First Boston

1st

188,777

Fee

North Augusta, SC

NONE

Leasehold

Philadelphia, PA

NONE

Leasehold

O' Fallon, MO

NONE

Fee

Rockville, MD (a)

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

521,718

Fee

Oak Lawn, IL

NONE

Leasehold

San Jose, CA (b)

Lehman Ali Inc.

1st

3,176,744

Fee

Painesville, OH

Credit Suisse First Boston

1st

188,777

Fee

Seven Hills, OH

B & K Properties

1st

263,917

Leasehold

Philadelphia, PA

NONE

Leasehold

Taylorville, IL

NONE

Fee

Rockville, MD (a)

Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A.

1st

521,718

Fee

Urbana, IL

NONE

Fee

San Jose, CA (b)

Lehman Ali Inc.

1st

2,964,532

Fee

Waverly, OH

NONE

Fee

Seven Hills, OH

B & K Properties

1st

263,917

Leasehold

Taylorville, IL

NONE

Fee

Urbana, IL

NONE

Fee

Waverly, OH

NONE

Fee

(a) NPAMLP owns an 82% interest in the property. Loan balance and annual debt service reflect NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

(b) NPAMLP owns a 23.9% Tenant in Common interest in this property. Loan balance and annual debt service reflect NPAMLP’s percentage ownership.

1311

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

NPAMLP is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of property operations. In the opinion of the General Partners, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on NPAMLP's financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

In 2005 NPAMLP sold the property in Ardmore, Oklahoma to an unrelated third party. In connection with this sale, NPAMLP accepted a $480,000 promissory note in consideration of a portion of the sale price. The note was due in October 2010. In October 2010 NPAMLP filed suit to collect the balance due. The obligor of this note has challenged the legality of the note and ~~has~~had not made any required payments of principal or interest since September 2010. In the first quarter of 2012, NPAMLP obtained a judgment against the obligor and subsequently entered into a Settlement Agreement, Forbearance and Release (“Forbearance Agreement”). Under the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, the obligor of this note is to pay the sum of $670,000, comprised of an initial payment of $150,000 in March 2012 and twenty-six consecutive monthly payments of $20,000. Interest accruing over the twenty-six month payment period is to be paid at the completion of the payment schedule. The initial payment due under the Forbearance Agreement was received by NPAMLP in March. NPAMLP will continue to vigorously ~~pursuing~~pursue this matter and ~~will~~expects ~~attempt~~ to ultimately collect the full ~~balance~~amount due under onthe ~~this~~Forbearance ~~note~~Agreement.

Item 4. ~~Removed~~Mine ~~and~~Safety ~~Reserved~~Disclosures

14Not applicable

~~PART II~~12

~~Item~~PART ~~5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities~~II

~~There is no trading market for the Units in NPAMLP~~I. ~~NPAMLP~~ ~~Units~~No ~~are~~Trading ~~not transferable except by will, inheritance or operation of law. To date no transfers other than those by will, inheritance and operation of law have been permitted.~~Market

InThere ~~addition,~~is ~~the~~no ~~Partnership~~trading market ~~Agreement~~for ~~places additional restrictions on~~ the ~~transferability~~Units ofin ~~the Units~~NPAMLP. ~~The~~ ~~Limited Partners of~~ NPAMLP ~~are prohibited from selling their~~ Units ~~unless~~are ~~such~~not ~~sale~~transferable isexcept atby ~~the Managing General Partner's direction~~will, isinheritance ~~accomplished~~or inoperation aof ~~single~~law. ~~transaction~~To ~~involving~~date ~~all~~no ~~Limited~~transfers other ~~Partners'~~than ~~interests~~those toby ~~a single purchaser~~will, inheritance and isoperation ~~accomplished simultaneously with the sale~~ of ~~the~~law ~~Equity~~have ~~General~~been ~~Partner's interest in NPAMLP~~permitted.

AsIn addition, the Partnership Agreement places additional restrictions on the transferability of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~Units. ~~2010,~~The ~~there~~Limited ~~were~~Partners ~~97,752~~of NPAMLP are prohibited from selling their Units ~~outstanding~~unless ~~held~~such bysale ~~approximately~~is 2at the Managing General Partner's direction,~~600~~ is accomplished in a single transaction involving all Limited Partners' interests to a single purchaser, and is accomplished simultaneously with the sale of the Equity General Partner's interest in NPAMLP.

~~II. Distributions~~As of ~~Cash~~December ~~Flow~~31, 2011, ~~From~~there ~~Operations~~were 97,752 Units outstanding held by approximately 2,600 Limited Partners.

~~NPAMLP may make annual distributions to its partners in an aggregate amount equal to its Cash Flow from Operations~~II. ~~NPAMLP~~ ~~has~~Distributions ~~not made any distributions~~ of Cash Flow ~~from~~ From Operations ~~to its partners since its organization. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute Cash Flow from Operations to its partners in the foreseeable future.~~

NPAMLP may make annual distributions to its partners in an aggregate amount equal to its Cash Flow from Operations. NPAMLP has not ~~reinvest~~made any distributions of Cash Flow from Operations to its partners since its organization. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in ~~additional~~a ~~real~~position ~~estate~~to distribute ~~investments~~Cash Flow from Operations to its partners in the foreseeable future.

~~III. Proceeds~~NPAMLP ofmay ~~Sales~~not ~~Distributions~~reinvest Cash Flow from Operations in additional real estate investments.

The Proceeds of Sales of the Properties may not be reinvested in additional real properties, except as permitted with respect to transactions that are non-taxable in whole or in substantial part under Section 1031 or 1033 of the Internal Revenue CodeIII. ~~The~~ Proceeds of Sales of the Properties, after payment of related expenses and indebtedness and provision for reasonable reserves, will be available for NPAMLP purposes, including paying Debt Service or providing for Capital Improvements with respect to other Properties owned by NPAMLP. After making the payments required by the Restructuring Agreement with respect to the Wrap Mortgages, all proceeds not utilized for NPAMLP purposes will be distributed to the partners of NPAMLP.Distributions

The ~~Restructuring~~Proceeds ~~Agreement~~of ~~provides~~Sales of ~~for~~the aProperties ~~sharing~~may ofnot ~~cash~~be ~~from~~reinvested ~~the~~in ~~Proceeds~~additional ofreal ~~Sales~~properties, ofexcept ~~the~~as ~~Properties~~permitted ~~after~~with ~~repayment~~respect ofto ~~the~~transactions ~~Third~~that ~~Party~~are non-taxable ~~Underlying~~in ~~Obligations~~whole ~~once~~or ~~the~~in ~~net~~substantial ~~Proceeds~~part ofunder ~~Sale~~Section of1031 ~~the~~or ~~Properties~~1033 ~~exceed~~of the ~~Threshold~~Internal ~~Amount~~Revenue Code. ~~Additionally,~~ ~~the~~The ~~Limited~~Proceeds ~~Partners~~of Sales of ~~NPAMLP~~the Properties, ~~receive~~after ~~40%~~payment of ~~the~~related ~~Cash~~expenses ~~Flow~~and ~~from~~indebtedness ~~Operations,~~and ifprovision ~~any~~for reasonable reserves, inwill ~~excess~~be ofavailable for NPAMLP purposes, including paying Debt Service ~~and~~or ~~any~~providing for Capital Improvements ~~and~~with ~~Reserves~~respect asto ~~considered~~other ~~necessary~~Properties owned by NPAMLP. ~~The~~ After ~~remaining~~making ~~cash~~the ~~flow,~~payments ifrequired ~~any,~~by isthe ~~applied~~Restructuring Agreement with respect to the Wrap Mortgages, inall ~~payment~~proceeds ofnot ~~accrued~~utilized for ~~interest~~NPAMLP ~~and~~purposes ~~then~~will ~~principal~~be distributed to the partners of NPAMLP.

~~NPAMLP~~The ~~has~~Restructuring ~~not~~Agreement provides ~~made~~for ~~any~~a sharing of cash from the Proceeds of Sales ~~Distributions~~of tothe ~~its~~Properties ~~partners~~after ~~since~~repayment ~~its~~of ~~organization~~the Third Party Underlying Obligations once the net Proceeds of Sale of the Properties exceed the Threshold Amount. It isAdditionally, ~~not~~the ~~anticipated~~Limited ~~that~~Partners of NPAMLP ~~will~~receive 40% beof inthe aCash ~~position~~Flow tofrom ~~distribute~~Operations, ~~Proceeds~~if any, in excess of ~~Sales~~Debt Service and any Capital Improvements and Reserves as considered necessary. The remaining cash flow, if any, is applied to ~~its~~the ~~partners~~Wrap Mortgages in ~~the~~payment ~~foreseeable~~of ~~future~~accrued interest and then principal.

IVNPAMLP has not made any Proceeds of Sales Distributions to its partners since its organization. ~~Certain~~ ~~Income~~It ~~Tax~~is ~~Considerations~~not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute Proceeds of Sales to its partners in the foreseeable future.

AIV. ~~Recognition~~Certain ofIncome ~~Gain~~Tax Considerations

ItA. isRecognition ~~anticipated that future forgiveness~~ of Wrap Mortgages, if any, and the potential of selling Properties, which are owned by Unaudited Partnerships, and applying sales proceeds to make payments on the Wrap Mortgages may require the Limited Partners to report substantial taxable income when the Properties are sold without the corresponding receipt of any cash proceeds therefrom (unless and until the Threshold Amount has been exceeded).Gain

~~Limited~~It ~~Partners~~is ~~are~~anticipated ~~allocated~~that future ~~their~~forgiveness ~~share~~ of ~~NPAMLP's~~Wrap ~~taxable~~Mortgages, ~~income and gain even~~ if ~~they~~any, ~~receive~~and nothe ~~cash~~potential ~~distributions~~of ~~from~~selling ~~NPAMLP~~Properties, ~~with~~ which toare ~~pay~~owned ~~any~~by ~~resulting~~Unaudited ~~tax liability~~Partnerships, and ~~will~~applying besales ~~allocated~~proceeds ~~their~~to ~~share~~make ofpayments ~~NPAMLP's~~on ~~tax~~the ~~losses,~~Wrap ~~including~~Mortgages ~~depreciation~~may ~~deductions. It~~require isthe ~~anticipated~~Limited ~~that~~Partners ~~NPAMLP~~to ~~will~~report ~~generate~~substantial ~~gradually~~taxable income ~~increasing~~when ~~amounts~~the ~~(which~~Properties ~~will~~are ~~ultimately~~sold bewithout ~~substantial)~~the ofcorresponding ~~taxable~~receipt ~~income,~~of ~~inasmuch~~any ascash ~~interest~~proceeds ~~expense~~therefrom (unless and ~~depreciation~~until ~~expense~~the ~~are~~Threshold Amount ~~gradually~~has ~~decreasing~~been ~~each year~~exceeded).

AsLimited ~~and~~Partners ~~when the Properties~~ are allocated ~~sold~~their orshare ~~otherwise disposed~~ of ~~(and~~NPAMLP's ~~whether or not any cash is distributed to Limited Partners in respect of such sales), all~~ taxable income ~~will~~and begain ~~allocated~~even ~~among~~if ~~those~~they ~~Limited~~receive ~~Partners~~no ~~who~~cash ~~were~~distributions ~~partners~~from inNPAMLP ~~the~~with ~~Partnership~~ which ~~owned the Property prior~~ to pay ~~the~~any ~~Consolidation~~resulting uptax toliability, ~~the~~and ~~amount~~will bybe ~~which~~allocated ~~the~~their ~~fair~~share ~~market value~~ of ~~such~~NPAMLP's ~~Properties~~tax ~~exceeded~~losses, ~~their~~including ~~adjusted~~depreciation ~~basis~~deductions. atIt is ~~the~~anticipated ~~time~~that ~~of contribution to~~ NPAMLP ~~(gain~~will ingenerate ~~excess~~gradually ofincreasing ~~such~~ amounts (which will ultimately be ~~allocated ratably among all Limited Partners~~substantial)~~. This~~ ~~rule~~of ~~does~~taxable ~~not~~income, inasmuch ~~apply~~as tointerest ~~tax-deferred~~expense ~~exchanges~~and ~~except~~depreciation toexpense ~~the~~are ~~extent~~gradually ofdecreasing ~~cash~~each ~~or “other property” received~~year.

1513

~~B. Treatment~~As and when the Properties are sold or otherwise disposed of ~~Distributions~~(and whether or not any cash is distributed to Limited Partners in respect of such sales), all taxable income will be allocated among those Limited Partners who were partners in the Partnership which owned the Property prior to the Consolidation up to the amount by which the fair market value of such Properties exceeded their adjusted basis at the time of contribution to NPAMLP (gain in excess of such amounts will be allocated ratably among all Limited Partners). This rule does not apply to tax-deferred exchanges except to the extent of cash or “other property” received.

~~Cash distributions made to a Limited Partner are not, per se, taxable; rather, they represent a return of capital up to the amount of his adjusted basis in his interest in NPAMLP~~B. A ~~return~~Treatment of ~~capital~~Distributions ~~generally~~by does not result in any recognition of gain or loss for federal income tax purposes, but reduces the recipient's adjusted basis in his investment. Certain partners whose returns were audited and adjusted (in connection with their investment in NPA sponsored limited partnerships) may have signed a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”); pursuant to the terms of such closing agreement, their tax treatment may vary from the foregoing; such partners are urged to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to this issue.NPAMLP

~~Distributions~~Cash distributions made to a Limited Partner are not, ifper ~~any~~se, intaxable; ~~excess~~rather, ofthey represent a ~~Limited~~return ~~Partner's~~of ~~adjusted~~capital up to the amount of his adjusted basis in his interest in NPAMLP. ~~interest~~A ~~immediately~~return ~~prior~~of ~~thereto~~capital ~~will~~generally does not result in ~~the~~any recognition of gain toor ~~that~~loss ~~extent~~for federal income tax purposes, but reduces the recipient's adjusted basis in his investment. ~~Unless~~ ~~NPAMLP~~Certain ispartners ~~treated~~whose ~~for~~returns ~~tax~~were ~~purposes~~audited asand adjusted (in connection with their investment in NPA sponsored limited partnerships) may have signed a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (“~~dealer~~IRS”); inpursuant ~~real~~to ~~property~~the terms of such closing agreement, their tax treatment may vary from the foregoing; such ~~gain~~partners ~~generally~~are ~~should~~urged beto ~~capital~~consult ~~gain~~with their own tax advisors with respect to this issue.

~~C. Operating~~Distributions, ~~Income~~if ~~(Loss)~~any, in excess of a Limited Partner's adjusted basis in his NPAMLP interest immediately prior thereto will result in the recognition of gain to that extent. Unless NPAMLP is treated for tax purposes as a “dealer” in real property, such gain generally should be capital gain.

~~Each~~C. ~~Limited~~Operating ~~Partner~~Income ~~will receive an annual Schedule K-1~~ (~~U.S. Form 1065~~Loss) ~~to indicate his share~~ of NPAMLP's taxable income or loss for each tax year. Such income or loss, rather than the distributions described in Part B above, is reportable by the Limited Partner. Since any loss generated by NPAMLP is, with respect to Limited Partners, a passive loss, the deductibility of such loss is governed by Section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and may be limited thereby.

~~Certain~~Each ~~Partnerships~~Limited ~~were~~Partner will ~~audited~~receive byan ~~the~~annual ~~IRS~~Schedule K-1 (~~the~~U.S. ~~“Audited~~Form ~~Partnerships”~~1065) ~~and~~to ~~the~~indicate ~~partners~~his ~~thereof~~share ~~executed~~of anNPAMLP's ~~agreement~~taxable ~~relating~~income toor ~~their~~loss ~~past~~for ~~and~~each ~~future~~tax ~~federal~~year. Such ~~tax~~income ~~liability~~or ~~(the~~loss, ~~“Closing~~rather ~~Agreement”). The~~than ~~foregoing~~the ~~paragraph~~distributions ~~applies~~described toin ~~those~~Part ~~investors~~B ~~who~~above, ~~have~~is ~~not~~reportable ~~signed~~by athe ~~Closing~~Limited ~~Agreement~~Partner. ~~with~~Since ~~IRS~~any ~~with~~loss generated ~~respect~~by toNPAMLP ~~their~~is, ~~Units.~~with Asrespect to ~~those~~ Limited Partners, ~~who have signed such~~ a ~~Closing~~passive ~~Agreement~~loss, the ~~appropriate~~deductibility ~~tax~~of ~~treatment~~such ~~may~~loss ~~differ~~is ~~from~~governed by Section 469 of the ~~foregoing~~Internal ~~and~~Revenue isCode ~~governed~~of by1986, ~~the~~and ~~Closing~~may ~~Agreement~~be limited thereby.

VCertain Partnerships were audited by the IRS (the “Audited Partnerships”) and the partners thereof executed an agreement relating to their past and future federal tax liability (the “Closing Agreement”). ~~Other~~The foregoing paragraph applies to those investors who have not signed a Closing Agreement with IRS with respect to their Units. As to those Limited Partners who have signed such a Closing Agreement, the appropriate tax treatment may differ from the foregoing and is governed by the Closing Agreement.

~~NPAMLP did not purchase any of its units that are registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act~~V. Other

~~Item~~NPAMLP 6.did ~~Selected~~not ~~Financial~~purchase any ~~Data~~of its units that are registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

~~Not~~Item ~~applicable~~6. Selected Financial Data

~~Item~~Not ~~7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~applicable

~~The~~Item ~~following~~7. ~~discussion should be read in conjunction with NPAMLP~~Management's ~~combined~~Discussion ~~financial statements~~ and ~~notes~~Analysis ~~thereto~~of ~~appearing~~Financial ~~elsewhere~~Condition inand ~~this~~Results ~~Report.~~of Operations

~~I. Liquidity~~The following discussion should be read in conjunction with NPAMLP's combined financial statements and ~~Capital~~notes ~~Resources~~thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report.

AI. ~~General~~ Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~As previously noted, the Properties owned by NPAMLP are encumbered by the Wrap Mortgages~~A. As a result of the Restructuring, the Debt Service on the Wrap Mortgages was adjusted to be the same as the 1990 debt service required on the Third Party Underlying Obligations. NPAMLP's ability to meet its obligations on the Wrap Mortgages is dependent on the Properties generating sufficient cash flow to meet the Debt Service.General

BAs previously noted, the Properties owned by NPAMLP are encumbered by the Wrap Mortgages. As a result of the Restructuring, the Debt Service on the Wrap Mortgages was adjusted to be the same as the 1990 debt service required on the Third Party Underlying Obligations. NPAMLP's ability to meet its obligations on the Wrap Mortgages is dependent on the Properties generating sufficient cash flow to meet the Debt Service.

AsB. ~~of December 31, 2010, the~~ Third Party ~~Underlying~~Debt ~~Obligations were current for all the Properties. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition - II Critical Accounting Policies.”~~Service

16As of December 31, 2011, the Third Party Underlying Obligations were current for all the Properties. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition - II Critical Accounting Policies.”

~~C. Working Capital~~14

~~As of December 31, 2010, NPAMLP has working capital of approximately $2,964,000 excluding amounts due to the Managing General Partner and the Pension Groups of $2,608,000 and $3,335,000, respectively~~C. In ~~2010,~~Working NPAMLP’s operations resulted in a $176,000 reduction in cash. This reduction was primarily due to $259,000 in capital improvements to the certain properties and the vacancy of the Anchor Tenant space at the property in Kalamazoo, Michigan. These were partially offset by the proceeds from the tenant litigation in Lake Mary, Florida and the partial condemnation of the Taylorville, Illinois property. NPAMLP's property operating budget for 2011, excluding capital expenditures, audit fees and certain insurance costs, projects negative cash flow of approximately $553,000. The budgeted negative cash flow is primarily the result of recent tenant vacancy at two properties, including the Anchor Tenant vacancy discussed above. Management is endeavoring to lease the vacant space, however the current economic environment will, in all probability, lengthen the time to do so. Management believes however that NPAMLP has sufficient working capital to meet its operating needs.Capital

ToAs ~~date~~of December 31, 2011, NPAMLP has ~~replenished its~~ working capital ~~reserves through the sale~~ of ~~Properties. This~~approximately ~~has~~$1,432,000 ~~occurred~~excluding ~~when~~amounts ~~holders~~due ofto the ~~Second~~Managing ~~Mortgage~~General Partner and ~~Wrap~~the ~~Mortgage~~Pension Groups ~~have~~of ~~released~~$2,729,000 ~~their~~and ~~liens~~$3,379,000, onrespectively. ~~Properties~~In ~~which have been sold~~2011, ~~notwithstanding~~NPAMLP’s ~~that~~operations ~~pursuant~~resulted in toa ~~the~~$286,000 ~~terms~~increase ofin ~~the~~cash. ~~Restructuring~~This ~~Agreement~~increase ~~the~~was ~~proceeds~~primarily ~~were~~due ~~payable~~ to the ~~holders~~sale of ~~the~~investment ~~Second~~securities ~~Mortgage~~to ~~and~~fund ~~the Wrap Mortgage. They have agreed in~~ certain ~~instances~~capital ~~to release their liens~~ improvements and provide ~~proceeds~~additional ~~from~~liquidity. ~~the sale to~~ NPAMLP's ~~because~~property ~~their~~operating ~~mortgages~~budget ~~are~~for ~~cross-collateralized~~2012, ~~against~~excluding ~~all~~capital expenditures, ofaudit ~~the~~fees ~~Properties~~ and ~~because~~certain ~~the~~insurance ~~proceeds~~costs, ~~from~~projects ~~the~~cash ~~sale~~flow of ~~such~~approximately ~~Properties have been utilized for the remaining Properties~~$71,000. ~~Although~~ ~~the~~The ~~Second~~budgeted ~~Mortgage~~cash ~~lenders~~flow ~~are~~is ~~not~~due primarily ~~obligated~~ to ~~subordinate~~the orprojected ~~release~~new ~~their~~lease ~~mortgages,~~for ~~their~~the ~~continued~~vacant ~~cooperation~~Anchor inTenant ~~this~~space ~~regard~~at ~~currently~~the ~~is expected by management~~Kalamazoo, ~~although~~Michigan ~~there can be no assurance that such Second Mortgage lenders will not change their behavior in the future~~property. ~~Pursuant~~ ~~to the 2003 Agreement (See “Item 7.~~ Management’s ~~Discussion~~is ~~and~~endeavoring to ~~Analysis~~lease ~~of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - V. Indebtedness Secured by~~ the ~~Properties~~remaining -vacant ~~D. Future Interest Agreement”)~~space, ~~the~~however ~~holders of~~ the ~~Wrap~~current ~~Mortgages~~economic ~~are~~environment ~~obligated~~will, ~~to release their mortgages~~ in ~~the~~all ~~event of a sale of Property. As of December 31~~probability, ~~2010,~~lengthen the ~~Managing~~time ~~General~~to ~~Partner~~do so. ~~has~~Management ~~advanced~~believes ~~approximately~~however ~~$2,608,000 to~~that NPAMLP ~~but~~has ~~may~~sufficient ~~require~~working ~~the~~capital ~~repayment~~to ofmeet ~~the advances for~~ its ~~own~~operating ~~operational~~ needs.

To date, NPAMLP has replenished its working capital reserves through the sale of Properties. This has occurred when holders of the Second Mortgage and Wrap Mortgage have released their liens on Properties which have been sold, notwithstanding that pursuant to the terms of the Restructuring Agreement the proceeds were payable to the holders of the Second Mortgage and the Wrap Mortgage. They have agreed in certain instances to release their liens and provide proceeds from the sale to NPAMLP because their mortgages are cross-collateralized against all of the Properties and because the proceeds from the sale of such Properties have been utilized for the remaining Properties. Although the Second Mortgage lenders are not obligated to subordinate or release their mortgages, their continued cooperation in this regard currently is expected by management, although there can be no assurance that such Second Mortgage lenders will not change their behavior in the future. Pursuant to the 2003 Agreement (See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - V. Indebtedness Secured by the Properties - D. ~~Loan~~ ~~Obligations~~Future Interest Agreement”), the holders of the Wrap Mortgages are obligated to release their mortgages in the event of a sale of Property. As of December 31, 2011, the Managing General Partner, or its affiliates, has advanced approximately $2,729,000 to NPAMLP but may require the repayment of the advances for its own operational needs.

Although all the Third Party Underlying Obligations on which balloon payments have become due to date have ultimately been refinanced, there can be no assurance that loan extensions will be successfully negotiated with the lenders holding the Third Party Underlying Obligations on these PropertiesD. InLoan ~~the event that NPAMLP is not able to obtain refinancing commitments from alternative lenders or loan extensions from the lenders holding the existing Third Party Underlying~~ Obligations~~, the properties could be lost to foreclosure. For the year ended December 31, 2011, there are no balloon payments due on the Third Party Underlying Mortgage Obligations. See “Item 2. Properties.”~~

EAlthough all the Third Party Underlying Obligations on which balloon payments have become due to date have ultimately been refinanced, there can be no assurance that loan extensions will be successfully negotiated with the lenders holding the Third Party Underlying Obligations on these Properties. ~~Capital~~ ~~Requirements~~In the event that NPAMLP is not able to obtain refinancing commitments from alternative lenders or loan extensions from the lenders holding the existing Third Party Underlying Obligations, the properties could be lost to foreclosure. For the year ended December 31, 2012, there are balloon payments due in January on the Third Party Underlying Mortgage Obligations on the properties in Grand Rapids, Michigan and Rockville, Maryland. However, under the terms of the respective Anchor Tenant leases, the Anchor Tenants are responsible for either refinancing the balloon payment or satisfying the mortgage in full. In January 2012, the Anchor Tenant for both properties elected to satisfy the balance of the Third Party Underlying Mortgage. See “Item 2. Properties.”

The average age of the Properties owned by NPAMLP is in excess of 20 years. Due to the age of the Properties, there is a continuing need for capital expenditures in order to properly maintain the Properties. At December 31, 2010, NPAMLP was committed for $30,000 in capital repairs to the Properties. During 2010, NPAMLP had an outstanding line of credit with E~~&H Properties of Delaware, Inc~~., ~~an affiliate of NPA (“EHD”), under which EHD would advance up to $2.5 million to NPAMLP for purposes of making~~ Capital and Tenant Improvements (the “NPAMLP Line”). Pursuant to the NPAMLP Line, the obligation of EHD to make advances to NPAMLP is at all times in the sole and absolute discretion of EHD. At December 31, 2010, availability under the EHD Firstrust Line permitted EHD to borrow up to $6,241,000 which it can loan to NPAMLP.Requirements

The average age of the Properties owned by NPAMLP is in excess of 20 years. Due to the age of the Properties, there is a continuing need for capital expenditures in order to properly maintain the Properties. At December 31, 2011, NPAMLP was committed for $277,000 in capital repairs to the Properties. During 2011, NPAMLP had an outstanding line of credit with E&H Properties of Delaware, Inc., an affiliate of NPA (“EHD”), under which EHD would advance up to $2.5 million to NPAMLP for purposes of making Capital and Tenant Improvements (the “NPAMLP Line”). Pursuant to the NPAMLP Line, the obligation of EHD to make advances to NPAMLP is at all times in the sole and absolute discretion of EHD. Amounts advanced pursuant to the NPAMLP Line bear interest at the Prime Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” section (3.25% at December 31, ~~2010~~2011).

EHD maintains a secured line of credit with Firstrust Bank of Conshohocken, PA (“Firstrust Bank”), which enables EHD to fund the NPAMLP Line in order to finance Capital and Tenant Improvements (the “EHD Firstrust Line”). At December 31, ~~2010~~2011 there is $32,~~451~~619,000 due under the EHD Firstrust Line. Pursuant to the promissory note executed with respect to the EHD Firstrust Line (the “Firstrust Note”), the amounts advanced pursuant to the Firstrust Note bear interest at the Prime Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” section (the “EHD Firstrust Borrowing Rate”). At December 31, 2011, availability under the EHD Firstrust Line permitted EHD to borrow up to $5,381,000 which it can loan to NPAMLP. The EHD Firstrust Borrowing Rate at December 31, ~~2010~~2011 is 3.25%.

The Firstrust Note is secured by an assignment of certain Wrap Notes and Second Mortgages and certain Guaranty and Suretyship Agreements executed by EBL&S Property Management, Inc. and Edward B. Lipkin. Additionally, the Firstrust Note contains a confession of judgment against EHD and the Guaranty and Suretyship Agreements contain a confession of judgment against EBL&S Property Management, Inc. and Edward B. Lipkin. At December 31, 2010, $194,000 has been advanced and $133,000 in accrued interest was due under the NPAMLP Line.15

17The Firstrust Note is secured by an assignment of certain Wrap Notes and Second Mortgages and certain Guaranty and Suretyship Agreements executed by EBL&S Property Management, Inc. and Edward B. Lipkin. Additionally, the Firstrust Note contains a confession of judgment against EHD and the Guaranty and Suretyship Agreements contain a confession of judgment against EBL&S Property

FManagement, Inc. ~~Tenant~~ ~~Improvements~~and Edward B. Lipkin. At December 31, 2011, $194,000 has been advanced and $139,000 in accrued interest was due under the NPAMLP Line.

The current retail rental market is such that proposed tenants for vacant space and those tenants whose leases are scheduled for renewal are aware of the pressure landlords are under to obtain and keep tenants and in certain instances are able to negotiate lease terms at reduced rental ratesF. ~~Many~~ ofTenant these tenants insist on substantial tenant improvement contributions from landlords. In the event that the tenants pay for their own improvements, they may pay a correspondingly lower rental rate than they would otherwise pay or are allowed rental abatements during the term of their leases. For the year ending December 31, 2010, there were no rental abatements.Improvements

IIThe current retail rental market is such that proposed tenants for vacant space and those tenants whose leases are scheduled for renewal are aware of the pressure landlords are under to obtain and keep tenants and in certain instances are able to negotiate lease terms at reduced rental rates. ~~Critical~~ ~~Accounting~~Many ~~Policies~~of these tenants insist on substantial tenant improvement contributions from landlords. In the event that the tenants pay for their own improvements, they may pay a correspondingly lower rental rate than they would otherwise pay or are allowed rental abatements during the term of their leases. For the year ending December 31, 2011, there were no rental abatements.

~~NPAMLP uses estimates and assumptions that can have a significant effect on the amounts that are reported in its financial statements~~II. ~~Management~~ ~~believes~~Critical ~~the following are its most significant accounting policies as they may require a higher degree of judgment and estimation.~~Accounting Policies

~~Rental~~NPAMLP ~~Properties: Rental~~uses ~~properties are stated at original cost. Depreciation on buildings~~ estimates and ~~building~~assumptions improvements is calculated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 30 years and 15 to 39 years, respectively. In accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, rental properties are reviewed by management for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that ~~the~~can ~~carrying~~have ~~amount~~a of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of rental properties is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the properties to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the properties. The determination of future undiscounted cash flows requires significant ~~estimates~~effect byon ~~management, including~~ the ~~expected~~amounts ~~course of action at the balance sheet date~~ that ~~would~~are ~~lead~~reported ~~to such cash flows. Subsequent changes~~ in ~~estimated~~its ~~undiscounted~~financial cash flows arising from changes in anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could materially impact NPAMLP’s net incomestatements. If ~~any~~Management ~~property is considered to be impaired,~~ believes the ~~impairment~~following toare beits ~~recognized~~most issignificant ~~measured~~accounting bypolicies ~~the~~as ~~amount~~they bymay ~~which~~require ~~the~~a ~~carrying~~higher ~~amount~~degree of ~~the~~judgment ~~property exceeds its fair value. Management determines fair value by utilizing market~~ and ~~income approaches~~estimation.

~~The~~Rental ~~market~~Properties: Rental ~~approach~~properties ~~estimates~~are ~~what~~stated aat ~~potential~~original ~~buyer~~cost. ~~would~~Depreciation ~~pay~~on ~~today. The~~buildings ~~key~~and ~~inputs~~building ~~used~~improvements inis calculated on the ~~model~~straight-line method ~~included,~~over ~~broker~~their ~~quotes,~~estimated ~~capitalization~~useful ~~rates,~~lives ~~expected~~of ~~lease~~30 upyears, and ~~holding~~15 ~~periods~~to or39 ~~property~~years, ~~appraisals~~respectively. ~~When~~In ~~available,~~accordance ~~current~~with ~~market~~FASB ~~information~~authoritative guidance, rental ~~like~~properties ~~comparative~~are ~~sales~~reviewed ~~price,~~by ~~was~~management ~~used~~for toimpairment ~~determine~~whenever ~~capitalization~~events ~~and~~or ~~rental~~changes ~~growth~~in ~~rates. NPAMLP also~~circumstances ~~utilizes~~indicate that the ~~income~~carrying amount ~~approach~~of toan ~~estimate~~asset ~~the~~may ~~fair~~not ~~value~~be recoverable. Recoverability of ~~our~~rental ~~income~~properties ~~producing~~is ~~real~~measured ~~estate~~by ~~assets.~~comparison Toof the ~~extent~~carrying amount ~~that~~of the ~~assumptions~~properties ~~used~~to inundiscounted ~~testing~~future ~~long-lived~~net ~~assets~~cash ~~for~~flows ~~impairment~~expected ~~differ~~to ~~from~~be ~~those~~generated ofby athe ~~marketplace~~properties. The ~~participant,~~determination of ~~the~~future ~~assumptions~~undiscounted ~~are~~cash ~~modified~~flows inrequires ~~order~~significant toestimates ~~estimate~~by management, including the ~~fair~~expected ~~value~~course of aaction ~~real~~at ~~estate~~the balance ~~asset~~sheet ~~when~~date anthat ~~impairment~~would ~~charge~~lead isto ~~measured~~such cash flows. InSubsequent ~~addition~~changes toin ~~determining~~estimated ~~future~~undiscounted cash flows, ~~which~~arising ~~make~~from ~~the~~changes in ~~estimation~~anticipated ofaction ato ~~real~~be ~~estate~~taken ~~asset’s~~with ~~undiscounted~~respect ~~cash~~to ~~flows~~the ~~highly~~property ~~subjective,~~could impact the ~~selection~~determination of ~~the~~whether ~~discount~~an ~~rate~~impairment exists and whether ~~exit~~the ~~capitalization~~effects ~~rate~~could ~~used~~materially inimpact ~~applying~~NPAMLP’s ~~the~~net income ~~approach is also highly subjective~~. ~~There~~If ~~were~~any noproperty ~~impairment~~is ~~charges~~considered ~~for~~to ~~the~~be ~~years ended December 31~~impaired, ~~2010~~the impairment ~~and 2009. Properties~~ to be ~~disposed~~recognized ~~are~~is ~~reported~~measured atby the ~~lower~~amount ofby which the carrying amount orof the property exceeds its fair value. Management ~~less~~determines ~~costs~~fair tovalue ~~sell~~by utilizing market and income approaches.

~~Rental~~The ~~income: Rental~~market ~~income~~approach estimates iswhat ~~recognized~~a onpotential abuyer ~~straight-line~~would ~~basis~~pay ~~over~~today. The ~~the~~key ~~terms~~inputs ofused in the ~~respective~~model ~~leases. Unbilled~~included, ~~rent~~broker ~~receivable~~quotes, ~~represents~~capitalization rates, ~~the~~expected ~~amount~~lease byup ~~which~~and ~~the~~holding ~~straight-line~~periods ~~rentals~~or ~~exceed~~property ~~the~~appraisals. When available, current ~~rent~~market ~~collectible~~information, ~~under~~like ~~the~~comparative sales ~~payment~~price, ~~terms~~was ofused ~~the~~to ~~lease~~determine ~~agreements~~capitalization and rental growth rates. ~~Percentage~~ NPAMLP also ~~rent~~utilizes ~~represents~~the ~~rental~~income approach to estimate the fair value of its income producing real estate assets. To the extent that the ~~tenant~~assumptions ~~pays~~used ~~based~~in ontesting along-lived assets ~~percentage~~for impairment differ from those of ~~its~~a ~~sales~~marketplace participant, ~~either~~the asassumptions aare ~~percentage~~modified ofin ~~total~~order ~~sales~~to orestimate asthe fair value of a ~~percentage~~real ofestate ~~sales~~asset inwhen ~~excess~~an impairment charge is measured. In addition to determining future cash flows, which make the estimation of a ~~threshold~~real ~~amount.~~estate ~~Percentage~~asset’s ~~rent~~undiscounted cash flows highly subjective, the selection of the discount rate and ~~tenant~~exit capitalization ~~pass-through~~rate used in applying the income approach is also highly subjective. There were no impairment charges ~~including~~for the ~~common~~years ~~area~~ended ~~maintenance~~December 31, ~~real~~2011 ~~estate~~and ~~taxes~~2010. ~~and~~Properties ~~property~~to ~~insurance~~be disposed are ~~recognized~~reported inat ~~income~~the ~~when~~lower ~~earned~~of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

~~Discount~~Rental onincome: ~~wraparound~~Rental income ~~mortgages: The~~is ~~discount~~recognized on ~~wraparound~~a ~~mortgages~~straight-line ~~represents~~basis over the ~~difference~~terms ~~between~~of the ~~present~~respective ~~value~~leases. ofUnbilled ~~mortgage~~rent ~~payments~~receivable atrepresents the amount ~~stated~~by ~~interest~~which ~~rate~~the ofstraight-line ~~4.1%~~rentals ~~and~~exceed the ~~imputed~~current ~~rate~~rent ofcollectible ~~12%. NPAMLP~~under ~~adjusts~~ the ~~discount~~payment onterms ~~wraparound~~of ~~mortgages for changes in~~ the ~~projected~~lease ~~cash flows~~agreements. ~~The~~ Percentage ~~resultant~~rent ~~increase~~represents orrental ~~decrease~~income inthat the ~~discount~~tenant ispays ~~recorded~~based ason ~~interest~~a ~~expense~~percentage ~~in the year~~ of ~~the~~its ~~adjustment.~~sales, ~~The~~either ~~discount~~as isa ~~amortized~~percentage ~~using~~of ~~the~~total sales ~~interest~~or ~~method~~as ~~over~~a ~~the~~percentage ~~terms~~ of ~~the~~sales ~~mortgages~~in ~~and~~excess isof ~~recorded~~a asthreshold ~~interest expense~~amount. In ~~accordance~~Percentage ~~with~~rent ~~the~~and ~~FASB~~tenant ~~authoritative~~pass-through ~~guidance,~~charges ~~NPAMLP~~including ~~accounts~~common area ~~for~~maintenance, ~~the~~real ~~unamortized~~estate ~~discount~~taxes onand ~~wraparound~~property ~~mortgages~~insurance ~~related~~are torecognized ~~wraparound mortgages that have been extinguished as losses or gains~~ in ~~the~~income ~~period~~when ~~of extinguishment~~earned.

~~Fair~~Discount on wraparound mortgages: The discount on wraparound mortgages represents the difference between the present value of ~~Financial~~mortgage ~~Instruments: The~~payments ~~FASB’s~~at ~~authoritative~~the stated ~~guidance~~interest ~~requires~~rate ~~disclosure~~ of 4.1% and the ~~fair~~imputed ~~value~~rate of ~~certain~~12%. ~~financial~~NPAMLP ~~instruments~~adjusts the discount on wraparound mortgages for changes in the projected cash flows. ~~Cash, tenant~~ ~~accounts~~The ~~receivable,~~resultant ~~accounts~~increase ~~payable~~or ~~and~~decrease ~~other~~in ~~liabilities~~the discount is recorded as ~~reflected~~interest expense in the ~~combined~~year ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~the ofadjustment. The ~~NPAMLP~~discount ~~approximate~~is ~~fair~~amortized ~~value~~using ~~because~~the effective interest method over the terms of the ~~short-term~~mortgages ~~maturity~~and ofis ~~these~~recorded ~~instruments.~~as interest expense. In accordance with ~~this~~the FASB authoritative guidance, NPAMLP ~~has~~accounts ~~determined~~for ~~that~~ the ~~estimated~~unamortized ~~fair~~discount ~~value~~on ~~of its~~ wraparound mortgages ~~based~~related to onwraparound ~~discounted~~mortgages ~~future~~that ~~cash~~have ~~flows~~been atextinguished aas ~~current~~losses ~~market~~or ~~rate~~gains ~~approximates~~in the ~~carrying~~period ~~value~~of ~~at December 31, 2010~~extinguishment.

1816

~~III~~Fair value of Financial Instruments: The FASB’s authoritative guidance requires disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments. ~~Factors~~Cash, tenant ~~That~~accounts ~~May~~receivable, ~~Influence~~accounts ~~Future~~payable ~~Results~~and other liabilities as reflected in the combined financial statements of ~~Operations~~NPAMLP approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. In accordance with this guidance, NPAMLP has determined that the estimated fair value of its wraparound mortgages based on discounted future cash flows at a current market rate approximates the carrying value at December 31, 2011.

A.Information ~~Real~~regarding ~~Estate~~recent ~~Valuation~~accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2 to the financial statements.

~~General economic conditions and the resulting impact on market conditions or a downturn in tenants’ businesses may adversely affect the value of NPAMLP’s assets~~III. Factors ~~Periods~~That ofMay ~~economic~~Influence ~~slowdown~~Future orResults ~~recession in the U.S., a decrease in market rental rates and/or market values~~ of real estate assets, could have a negative impact on the value of NPAMLP properties and related tenant improvements. If NPAMLP was required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to write down the carrying value of any properties to the lower of cost or market due to impairment, or if as a result of an early lease termination we were required to remove and dispose of material amounts of tenant improvements that are not reusable to another tenant, NPAMLP’s results of operations would be negatively affected.Operations

19A. Real Estate Valuation

BGeneral economic conditions and the resulting impact on market conditions or a downturn in tenants’ businesses may adversely affect the value of NPAMLP’s assets. ~~Leasing~~Periods ~~Activity~~of economic slowdown or recession in the U.S., a decrease in market rental rates and/or ~~Rental~~market ~~Rates~~values of real estate assets, could have a negative impact on the value of NPAMLP properties and related tenant improvements. If NPAMLP was required under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to write down the carrying value of any properties to the lower of cost or market due to impairment, or if as a result of an early lease termination it was required to remove and dispose of material amounts of tenant improvements that are not reusable to another tenant, NPAMLP’s results of operations would be negatively affected.

~~During the next twelve months 13 leases representing 3% of the net leasable square footage of all NPAMLP properties, are scheduled to expire~~B. ~~The~~Leasing ~~amount~~Activity ~~of net rental income generated by NPAMLP properties depends principally on the ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space~~ and toRental lease currently available space, and space available from unscheduled lease terminations. The amount of rental income generated also depends on the ability to maintain or increase rental rates at the properties. Negative trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect rental income in future periods.Rates

InDuring ~~September~~the ~~2009,~~next ~~the~~twelve months ~~anchor~~14 ~~tenant~~leases atrepresenting 7% of the ~~property~~net inleasable ~~Kalamazoo,~~square ~~Michigan~~footage ~~elected~~of ~~not~~all NPAMLP properties, are scheduled to ~~exercise~~expire. aThe ~~five~~amount of ~~year~~net ~~option~~rental toincome ~~extend~~generated ~~its~~by ~~lease,~~NPAMLP ~~and~~properties ~~accordingly~~depends principally on the ~~anchor~~ability ~~tenant~~to ~~space~~maintain ~~became~~the ~~vacant~~occupancy ~~effective~~rates ~~March~~of 1,currently leased ~~2010. Although~~space ~~there~~and isto nolease ~~third~~currently ~~party~~available ~~underlying~~space, ~~indebtedness~~and onspace ~~the~~available ~~property,~~from ifunscheduled ~~NPAMLP~~lease isterminations. ~~unable~~The toamount ~~find~~of arental income ~~new~~generated ~~tenant~~also ~~NPAMLP~~depends ~~may~~on bethe ~~unable~~ability to ~~meet~~maintain ~~its~~or ~~obligations~~increase ~~under~~rental rates at the ~~ground~~properties. ~~lease~~Negative ~~and~~trends ~~the~~in ~~property~~one ~~may~~or more beof ~~lost~~these ~~due~~factors tocould aadversely ~~termination~~affect ofrental ~~the~~income ~~ground~~in ~~lease~~future periods.

CIn September 2009, the anchor tenant at the property in Kalamazoo, Michigan elected not to exercise a five year option to extend its lease, and accordingly the anchor tenant space became vacant effective March 1, 2010. ~~Tenant~~Although ~~Credit~~there ~~Risk~~is no third party underlying indebtedness on the property, if NPAMLP is unable to find a new tenant, NPAMLP may be unable to meet its obligations under the ground lease and the property may be lost due to a termination of the ground lease.

~~In the event of a tenant default, NPAMLP may experience delays in enforcing its rights as a landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting its investment~~C. ~~NPAMLP~~Tenant ~~management~~Credit regularly evaluates its accounts receivable reserve policy in light of its tenant base and general and local economic conditions. If economic conditions persist or deteriorate further, NPAMLP may experience increases in past due accounts, defaults, lower occupancy and reduced effective rents. This condition would negatively affect NPAMLP’s future net income and cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on NPAMLP’s financial condition.Risk

IVIn the event of a tenant default, NPAMLP may experience delays in enforcing its rights as a landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting its investment. NPAMLP ~~Results~~management regularly evaluates its accounts receivable reserve policy in light of ~~Operations~~its tenant base and general and local economic conditions. If economic conditions persist or deteriorate further, NPAMLP may experience increases in past due accounts, defaults, lower occupancy and reduced effective rents. This condition would negatively affect NPAMLP’s future net income and cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on NPAMLP’s financial condition.

AIV. ~~Property~~ ~~Dispositions~~Results ~~and~~of ~~Acquisitions During Fiscal 2010~~Operations

~~NPAMLP owned 24 properties at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009~~A. ~~There~~ ~~were~~Property noDispositions full property dispositions in 2010 or 2009. In 2010, a portion of the Taylorville, Illinois property was conveyed to the City of Taylorville in lieu of eminent domain. As a result of this transaction, NPAMLP recognized a net gain on disposition of properties of $54. See “Item 1. Business - II. NPAMLP Objectives and ~~Policies~~Acquisitions During -Fiscal ~~B. Competition for Tenants - Anchor Tenants.”~~2011

20NPAMLP owned 24 properties at December 31, 2011 and 2010. There were no full property dispositions in 2011 or 2010. In 2010, a portion of the Taylorville, Illinois property was conveyed to the City of Taylorville in lieu of eminent domain. As a result of this transaction, NPAMLP recognized a net gain on disposition of properties of $54,000. See “Item 1. Business - II. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies - B. Competition for Tenants - Anchor Tenants.”

B. Full Fiscal Years

Over the two year period ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011, other than the conveyance of a portion of the Taylorville, Illinois property in lieu of eminent domain, NPAMLP did not acquire or dispose of any properties. This conveyance resulted in “Gain on disposition of properties, net”, as reflected in the financial statements. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – II. Critical Accounting Policies”.

The following table reflects the operating results (in thousands) for NPAMLP for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The table is presented in order to facilitate an understanding of the operating results and trends of NPAMLP.17

	(in Thousands)
	2010			2009
Income:
Rental income	$	12,767		$	13,042
Other charges to tenants		3,067			3,242
Interest income		151			236
Total income		15,985			16,520
Operating expenses:
Interest expense		13,099			12,313
Other operating expenses		6,982			6,863
Depreciation and amortization		4,118			4,104
Total operating expense		24,199			23,280
Operating loss	$	(8,214	)	$	(6,760	)

The following table reflects the operating results (in thousands) for NPAMLP for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The table is presented in order to facilitate an understanding of the operating results and trends of NPAMLP.

The decrease in rental income and other charges in 2010 is primarily due to the decrease in minimum rent and other charges resulting from the vacancy of the Anchor Tenant at the Kalamazoo, Michigan property.

	(in Thousands)
	2011			2010
Income:
Rental income	$	12,483		$	12,767
Other charges to tenants		2,975			3,067
Interest income		79			151
Total income		15,537			15,985

Operating expenses:
Interest expense		13,926			13,099
Other operating expenses		6,543			6,982
Depreciation and amortization		3,045			4,118
Total operating expense		23,514			24,199

Operating loss	$	(7,977	)	$	(8,214	)

The decrease ~~change~~ in ~~Interest expense~~rental isincome ~~due~~and ~~to adjustments~~other charges to ~~the~~tenants ~~discount on wraparound mortgages~~ in ~~2010~~2011 ~~and~~is ~~2009.~~primarily ~~NPAMLP~~due ~~adjusts~~to the ~~discount on~~closing ~~wraparound~~of ~~mortgages for changes in~~ the ~~projected~~antique ~~cash~~mall ~~flows. In~~in ~~2010~~North Augusta and ~~2009,~~the ~~changes~~decrease in ~~the~~minimum ~~projected~~rent ~~cash~~and ~~flows~~other ~~resulted~~charges inresulting anfrom ~~adjustment~~the ~~that~~vacancy ~~increased~~of the ~~discount~~Anchor ~~and~~Tenant ~~reduced~~at ~~interest~~the ~~expense by $145~~Kalamazoo,~~000~~ ~~and~~Michigan ~~$597,000, respectively~~property. ~~(see “II. Critical Accounting Policies”).~~ The ~~increase~~decrease in ~~Other~~interest ~~operating~~income ~~expenses in 2010~~ is due to athe ~~provision~~reduction ~~for~~in ~~bad~~investment ~~debt~~securities ~~arising~~and ~~from~~ the ~~collection~~delinquency of the note receivable due from the sale of the ~~property in~~ Ardmore, Oklahoma ~~(see~~property as NPAMLP stopped accruing interest on this note. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings”).

VInterest expense is scheduled to increase annually as the discount on wraparound mortgages amortizes over the terms of the mortgages using the effective interest method. ~~Tabular Disclosure~~ The scheduled increase for 2011 was approximately $400,000. In addition, NPAMLP adjusts the discount on wraparound mortgages for changes in the projected cash flows. In 2011 changes in the projected cash flows resulted in an adjustment that decreased the discount and increased interest expense by $211,000. In 2010, changes in the projected cash flows resulted in an adjustment that increased the discount and decreased interest expense by $145,000. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of ~~Contractual Obligations~~ Financial Condition and Results of Operations - II. Critical Accounting Policies”. The decrease in Other operating expenses in 2011 is due to the reduced 2011 operating expenses arising from the closing of the antique mall in North Augusta and the provision for bad debts recorded in 2010 arising from the delinquency of the note receivable due from the sale of the property in Ardmore, Oklahoma. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings”. The decrease in depreciation expense is due to the fact that certain buildings owned by NPAMLP were fully depreciated at the end of 2010.

~~Not~~V. ~~applicable~~Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

~~VI. Indebtedness~~Not ~~Secured by the Properties~~applicable

~~The Properties are subject to certain indebtedness that was incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Properties by the Partnerships~~VI. As ofIndebtedness ~~December~~Secured 31, 2010, the aggregate indebtedness of NPAMLP pursuant to the Wrap Mortgages was approximately $149 million, of which approximately $49 million constituted indebtedness under the Third Party Underlying Obligations and $8 million constituted indebtedness under the Second Mortgages. As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate historical cost of the Properties securing the indebtedness of NPAMLP mortgages was approximately $137 million. The original acquisition of the Properties by the ~~Partnerships was typically structured as set forth below.~~Properties

21The Properties are subject to certain indebtedness that was incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Properties by the Partnerships. As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate indebtedness of NPAMLP pursuant to the Wrap Mortgages was approximately $140 million, of which approximately $47 million constituted indebtedness under the Third Party Underlying Obligations and $5 million constituted indebtedness under the Second Mortgages. As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate historical cost of the Properties securing the indebtedness of NPAMLP mortgages was approximately $138 million. The original acquisition of the Properties by the Partnerships was typically structured as set forth below.

Typically, NPA acquired a Property from an unaffiliated seller. NPA thereafter sold the Property to a Pension Group. The Partnership acquired the Property from the Pension Group. In both the original acquisition and the purchase by the Pension Group, the purchasers (i.e., NPA and the Pension Group) took the Properties subject to existing mortgages in favor of the sellers or unaffiliated third parties. Consequently, as a general matter, at the time it was acquired by the Partnership, each Property was subject to a Third Party Underlying Obligation and a Second Mortgage.

The Partnerships typically paid the purchase price for the Properties in part by delivering to the Pension Group a Wrap Mortgage. The Wrap Mortgage represented a lien on the Property subordinate to the Third Party Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage. Neither the Third Party Underlying Obligation nor the Second Mortgage represented direct financial obligations of the Partnership. Rather, the Wrap Mortgage required the Pension Group to use the payments made thereunder to make the required payments under the Third Party Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage. The Third Party Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage continued, however, as liens against the Property. The Wrap Mortgage obligated the Partnership to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Third Party Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage.18

The ~~Properties~~Partnerships ~~whose~~typically paid ~~ownership~~the ~~was~~purchase ~~combined~~price for the Properties in ~~NPAMLP~~part ~~remain~~by ~~subject~~delivering to the Pension Group a Wrap Mortgage. The Wrap Mortgage represented a lien on the Property subordinate to the Third Party Underlying ~~Obligations,~~Obligation ~~Second~~and ~~Mortgages~~the ~~and~~Second ~~Wrap~~Mortgage. ~~Mortgages~~Neither ~~incurred~~the inThird ~~connection~~Party ~~with~~Underlying Obligation nor the ~~acquisition~~Second Mortgage represented direct financial obligations of the ~~Properties~~Partnership. ~~However~~ Rather, the Wrap ~~Mortgages~~Mortgage ~~and~~required the ~~Second~~Pension ~~Mortgages~~Group ~~have~~to ~~been~~use ~~restructured~~the ~~pursuant~~payments made thereunder to make the ~~Restructuring~~required ~~Agreement.~~payments ~~See~~under “the ~~Section~~Third VParty Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage. CThe Third Party Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage continued, however, as liens against the Property. The Wrap ~~Mortgages”~~Mortgage ~~below~~obligated the Partnership to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Third Party Underlying Obligation and the Second Mortgage.

A. The Properties whose ownership was combined in NPAMLP remain subject to the Third Party Underlying Obligations, Second Mortgages and Wrap Mortgages incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Properties. However, the Wrap Mortgages and Second Mortgages have been restructured pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – VI Indebtedness Secured by the Properties - II. Critical Accounting Policies - V. C. The Wrap Mortgages” below

~~Information~~A. ~~relating to the~~ Third Party Underlying Obligations ~~is included in Schedule 3, which appears under “Item 2. Properties” above.~~

~~B. The~~Information ~~Second~~relating to ~~Mortgages~~the ~~and~~Third ~~Notes~~Party Underlying Obligations is included in Schedule 3, which appears under “Item 2. Properties”, above.

~~Under the terms of the Restructuring Agreement, no payments are currently due on the Second Mortgages~~B. The ~~outstanding principal balance of the~~ Second Mortgages asand of December 31, 2010, was approximately $8 million. The Restructuring Agreement provides that this indebtedness will be paid from proceeds realized from the sale of property subject to the sharing arrangement established in the Restructuring Agreement.Notes

CUnder the terms of the Restructuring Agreement, no payments are currently due on the Second Mortgages. The ~~Wrap~~outstanding principal balance of the Second Mortgages as of December 31, 2011, was approximately $5 million. The Restructuring Agreement provides that this indebtedness will be paid from proceeds realized from the sale of property subject to the sharing arrangement established in the Restructuring Agreement.

C. The Wrap Mortgages ~~represent an obligation of NPAMLP and a lien against the Properties in favor of the NPAEP. The lien is subordinate to the Third Party Underlying Obligations and the Second Mortgages, if any.~~

The ~~Restructuring Agreement amended and restructured each~~ Wrap ~~Note~~Mortgages represent toan ~~provide that each Wrap Note would consist of the~~ obligation ~~to pay two principal balances, an interest-bearing principal balance equal to the original principal indebtedness when the Wrap Note was first executed and delivered by the Partnership less amounts~~ of ~~principal,~~NPAMLP ~~if any, paid prior to January 1, 1990,~~ and ana ~~non-interest~~lien ~~bearing~~against ~~principal balance equal to~~ the ~~amount~~Properties ~~of interest accrued and unpaid under the Wrap Note prior to January 1, 1990. The Restructuring Agreement adjusted the interest rate on the Wrap Notes~~ in ~~such~~favor ~~a way that the interest bearing principal balance earns interest at a rate elected by the Managing General Partner to assure that there will be adequate interest paid over the life~~ of the ~~Wrap~~NPAEP. ~~Note~~The tolien ~~comply~~is ~~with~~subordinate ~~applicable Internal Revenue Code requirements in order~~ to ~~prevent~~ the ~~imputation~~Third Party ofUnderlying ~~interest.~~Obligations Atand ~~December 31, 2010,~~ the ~~interest~~Second ~~rate on the Wrap~~ Mortgages, ~~was~~if 4any.~~1% (see “D. Future Interest Agreement”). The Wrap Notes mature on December 31, 2013.~~

~~Each~~The ~~Wrap~~Restructuring ~~Note~~Agreement amended ~~requires~~and arestructured ~~minimum~~each ~~annual~~Wrap ~~payment~~Note ~~from~~to ~~NPAMLP~~provide inthat aneach ~~amount~~Wrap ~~equal~~Note towould ~~the~~consist ~~1990~~of ~~Debt Service payable on~~ the ~~Third~~obligation ~~Party~~to ~~Underlying~~pay ~~Obligations~~two ~~secured~~principal bybalances, an ~~the~~interest-bearing ~~same~~principal ~~Properties~~balance asequal to the ~~Wrap~~original ~~Mortgages~~principal ~~that~~indebtedness ~~secured~~when ~~such~~the Wrap Note ~~prior~~was ~~to the Restructuring. These minimum payments are applied~~ first toexecuted ~~past due interest~~ and ~~principal~~delivered by ~~payments~~the ~~under~~Partnership ~~the~~less ~~Wrap~~amounts ~~Notes~~of principal, if any, ~~then~~paid prior to ~~current~~January ~~interest~~1, 1990, and ~~principal~~an ~~payments~~non-interest ~~due~~bearing onprincipal ~~the~~balance equal ~~Wrap~~to ~~Notes, then against~~ the ~~interest-bearing~~amount ~~principal balances~~ of ~~the~~interest ~~Wrap~~accrued ~~Notes,~~and ~~allocated~~unpaid ~~among~~under the Wrap ~~Notes~~Note asprior ~~NPAEP~~to ~~elects~~January 1, ~~and~~1990. ~~finally~~The toRestructuring Agreement adjusted the ~~non-~~interest~~-bearing~~ ~~principal~~rate ~~balances,~~on ~~allocated among~~ the Wrap Notes asin ~~NPAEP~~such ~~elects. The~~a ~~Restructuring~~way ~~Agreement~~that ~~requires~~the ~~NPAMLP~~interest tobearing ~~make~~principal ~~additional~~balance ~~payments~~earns oninterest ~~the~~at ~~Wrap~~a ~~Notes~~rate onelected by ~~April~~the ~~10th~~Managing ofGeneral ~~each~~Partner ~~year equal~~ to ~~sixty~~assure ~~percent~~that ~~(60%)~~there ofwill ~~the~~be ~~amounts~~adequate byinterest ~~which~~paid ~~Cash~~over ~~Flow~~the ~~from~~life ~~Operations~~of ~~for~~ the ~~previous~~Wrap ~~year~~Note ~~exceeded~~to ~~the~~comply ~~sum~~with applicable ofInternal ~~the~~Revenue ~~minimum~~Code ~~annual~~requirements ~~payment~~ in ~~such~~order ~~year~~to ~~plus~~prevent the ~~current~~imputation ~~payments~~of ~~due~~interest. inAt ~~such~~December ~~year~~31, on2011, ~~any~~the ~~indebtedness~~interest rate ~~incurred~~on ~~after~~the ~~January~~Wrap 1,Mortgages ~~1990~~was ~~for~~4.1%. ~~Capital~~The ~~Improvements~~Wrap toNotes ~~any~~mature ofon ~~the~~December ~~Properties~~31, 2013. ~~The~~ ~~holder~~See of“Item ~~the~~7. ~~Wrap~~Management’s ~~Notes~~Discussion and ~~applies~~Analysis ~~the~~of ~~minimum~~Financial ~~annual~~Condition ~~payments~~and toResults ~~pay~~of ~~the~~Operations ~~current~~- ~~payments~~VI. ~~due~~Indebtedness onSecured by the ~~Third~~Properties ~~Party~~- ~~Underlying~~D. ~~Obligations~~Future Interest Agreement.”

22Each Wrap Note requires a minimum annual payment from NPAMLP in an amount equal to the 1990 Debt Service payable on the Third Party Underlying Obligations secured by the same Properties as the Wrap Mortgages that secured such Wrap Note prior to the Restructuring. These minimum payments are applied first to past due interest and principal payments under the Wrap Notes, if any, then to current interest and principal payments due on the Wrap Notes, then against the interest-bearing principal balances of the Wrap Notes, allocated among the Wrap Notes as NPAEP elects, and finally to the non-interest-bearing principal balances, allocated among the Wrap Notes as NPAEP elects. The Restructuring Agreement requires NPAMLP to make additional payments on the Wrap Notes on April 10th of each year equal to sixty percent (60%) of the amounts by which Cash Flow from Operations for the previous year exceeded the sum of the minimum annual payment in such year plus the current payments due in such year on any indebtedness incurred after January 1, 1990 for Capital Improvements to any of the Properties. The holder of the Wrap Notes applies the minimum annual payments to pay the current payments due on the Third Party Underlying Obligations.

The Restructuring Agreement provides that all the Wrap Notes that were originally secured by Wrap Mortgages on the Properties that NPAMLP acquired from partnerships audited by the Internal Revenue Service will be secured by all of those Wrap Mortgages and will not be secured by Wrap Mortgages on the Properties that NPAMLP acquired from the Unaudited Partnerships. All of the Wrap Notes that were originally secured by Wrap Mortgages on the Properties that NPAMLP acquired from Unaudited Partnerships are secured by all of those Wrap Mortgages and are not secured by Wrap Mortgages on the Properties that NPAMLP acquired from partnerships audited by the Internal Revenue Service. The holder of the Wrap Mortgages agreed in the Restructuring Agreement to release from the lien of the Wrap Mortgages any Property sold by NPAMLP, upon payment to the holder of the Wrap Mortgages, as a pre-payment of the Wrap Notes, an amount equal to all of the Proceeds of Sales of the Properties not permitted by the Restructuring Agreement to be retained by NPAMLP.19

The Restructuring Agreement provides ~~permits~~that ~~NPAMLP~~all ~~to have~~ the ~~opportunity~~Wrap toNotes ~~retain,~~that inwere ~~certain~~originally ~~circumstances,~~secured aby ~~portion~~Wrap ofMortgages ~~the~~on ~~Excess Proceeds. In accordance with~~ the ~~Restructuring~~Properties ~~Agreement~~that ~~the~~NPAMLP ~~Excess~~acquired ~~Proceeds~~from ~~derived~~partnerships audited ~~from~~by the ~~Proceeds~~Internal ofRevenue ~~Sales~~Service ofwill ~~the~~be ~~Properties~~secured ~~are~~by ~~applied~~all ~~as follows: (a) 100%~~ of ~~the~~those ~~Excess~~Wrap ~~Proceeds~~Mortgages ~~are~~and ~~applied~~will innot ~~payment~~be ofsecured ~~the~~by Wrap Mortgages on ~~until~~ the ~~Threshold~~Properties ~~Amount~~that ~~has~~NPAMLP ~~been~~acquired ~~paid;~~from ~~(b)~~ the ~~next~~Unaudited ~~$70~~Partnerships. ~~million~~All of ~~Excess Proceeds are allocated 60% to~~ the ~~payment of the~~ Wrap ~~Mortgage~~Notes ~~and~~that ~~40%~~were ~~are~~originally ~~retained~~secured by ~~NPAMLP;~~Wrap Mortgages ~~(c)~~on ~~100% of~~ the ~~next~~Properties ~~Excess~~that ~~Proceeds up to an amount equal to the Investor Note Recovery or $25 million, whichever is less, are retained by~~ NPAMLP ~~and~~acquired ~~distributed~~from byUnaudited ~~NPAMLP~~Partnerships ~~to the Investor Note Payors; (d) the next Excess Proceeds~~ are ~~allocated~~secured by ~~60%~~all ~~to the payment~~ of ~~the~~those Wrap Mortgages and ~~40%~~ are not ~~retained~~secured by ~~NPAMLP up to an amount equal to the outstanding balances for the~~ Wrap Mortgages on ~~January 1, 1990 less~~ the ~~sum~~Properties ~~of: (i)~~that ~~the~~NPAMLP ~~aggregate~~acquired ~~amount~~from ofpartnerships ~~the~~audited ~~sums~~by ~~previously paid as Minimum Payoff Amounts; (ii)~~ the ~~Investor~~Internal ~~Note~~Revenue ~~Recovery,~~Service. The ~~and~~holder ~~(iii) $70 million; (e) 100%~~ of the ~~next Excess Proceeds are applied in payment of the~~ Wrap Mortgages agreed in the ~~amount~~Restructuring ~~equal~~Agreement to ~~(i)~~release from the ~~amount~~lien ~~necessary~~of ~~to pay in full~~ the Wrap Mortgages onany ~~Properties~~Property sold ~~acquired from partnerships audited~~ by ~~the~~NPAMLP, ~~Internal~~upon ~~Revenue~~payment ~~Service,~~to in the ~~case~~holder of ~~Excess~~the ~~Proceeds~~Wrap ~~generated~~Mortgages, byas ~~the~~a ~~sale~~pre-payment of ~~such~~the aWrap ~~Property~~Notes, ~~and~~an ~~(ii) the~~ amount ~~necessary~~equal to ~~pay~~all ~~in full~~ of the ~~Wrap~~Proceeds ~~Mortgages~~of onSales ~~Properties~~of ~~acquired from Unaudited Partnerships, in~~ the ~~case~~Properties ofnot ~~Excess~~permitted ~~Proceeds generated~~ by the ~~sale~~Restructuring ofAgreement ~~such~~to abe ~~Property; and (f) 100% of any additional Excess Proceeds are~~ retained by NPAMLP.

The Restructuring Agreement permits ~~provides~~NPAMLP ~~for~~to ~~indebtedness~~have ~~which~~the ~~may~~opportunity beto ~~incurred~~retain, in certain circumstances, a portion of the Excess Proceeds. In accordance with the Restructuring Agreement the Excess Proceeds derived from the Proceeds of Sales of the Properties are applied as follows: (a) 100% of the Excess Proceeds are applied in payment of the Wrap Mortgages until the Threshold Amount has been paid; (b) the next $70 million of Excess Proceeds are allocated 60% to ~~finance~~the ~~Capital~~payment ~~Improvements~~of the Wrap Mortgage and 40% are retained by NPAMLP; (c) 100% of the next Excess Proceeds up to an amount equal to the ~~Properties~~Investor ~~after~~Note ~~January~~Recovery 1or $25 million, ~~1990~~whichever is less, are retained by NPAMLP and ~~requires~~distributed ~~that~~by inNPAMLP ~~connection~~to ~~with~~the ~~any~~Investor ~~sale~~Note Payors; (d) the next Excess Proceeds are allocated by 60% to the payment of ~~Property~~the Wrap Mortgages and 40% are retained by NPAMLP, up to an amount equal to the ~~loans~~outstanding balances for ~~Capital~~the ~~Improvements~~Wrap toMortgages ~~such~~on January ~~Property~~1, ~~must~~1990 ~~either~~less bethe sum of: (i) the aggregate amount of the sums previously paid as Minimum Payoff Amounts; (ii) the Investor Note Recovery, and (iii) $70 million; (e) 100% of the next Excess Proceeds are applied in payment of the Wrap Mortgages in the amount equal to (i) the amount necessary to pay in full orthe ~~assumed~~Wrap Mortgages on Properties acquired from partnerships audited by the Internal Revenue Service, in the ~~purchaser~~case of Excess Proceeds generated by the sale of such a Property, ~~before~~and (ii) the amount necessary to pay in full the Wrap ~~Mortgage~~Mortgages on Properties acquired from Unaudited Partnerships, in the case of Excess Proceeds generated by the sale of such a Property; ~~will~~and be(f) ~~released~~100% of any additional Excess Proceeds are retained by NPAMLP.

The Restructuring Agreement provides ~~permits~~for ~~the~~indebtedness ~~holders~~which ofmay ~~the~~be ~~Wrap~~incurred ~~Mortgages~~ to ~~refinance~~finance orCapital ~~negotiate~~Improvements ~~modifications~~ to the ~~Third~~Properties ~~Party~~after ~~Underlying~~January ~~Obligations~~1, so1990, ~~long~~and asrequires that ~~the~~in ~~aggregate~~connection ~~amount~~with ofany ~~all~~sale ~~Third~~of ~~Party~~Property ~~Underlying~~by ~~Obligations~~NPAMLP, isthe ~~not~~loans ~~increased. The~~for ~~fees~~Capital ~~and~~Improvements ~~expenses~~to ~~associated with any~~ such ~~refinancing~~Property ormust ~~modification~~either ~~are~~be ~~required~~paid in tofull beor ~~borne~~assumed by the ~~holders~~purchaser of the Property before the Wrap ~~Mortgages~~Mortgage on such Property will be released.

The Restructuring Agreement permits ~~spreads~~ the ~~lien~~holders ~~securing each~~ of the ~~Second~~Wrap Mortgages to ~~all~~refinance ofor negotiate modifications to the ~~Properties~~Third ~~owned~~Party byUnderlying ~~NPAMLP~~Obligations, ~~and~~so long ~~all~~as the aggregate amount of ~~the Second~~all ~~Mortgages~~Third ~~have~~Party ~~been~~Underlying ~~“wrapped”~~Obligations is not increased. The fees and expenses associated with any such refinancing or ~~included~~modification ~~within~~are ~~all~~required to be borne by the holders of the Wrap Mortgages.

~~D. Future~~The Restructuring ~~Interest~~ Agreement spreads the lien securing each of the Second Mortgages to all of the Properties owned by NPAMLP and all of the Second Mortgages have been “wrapped” or included within all of the Wrap Mortgages.

In March 2003 NPAMLP, NPAEP and PVPG, entered into an Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2003 (the “2003 Agreement”), in which NPAEP and PVPG agreed with NPAMLP to modify the terms of Wrap Mortgages held by NPAEP and PVPGD. ~~The~~Future ~~terms~~Interest ~~of the 2003~~ Agreement provided that NPAEP and PVPG: (a) reduce to 4.1% per year the annual interest rate payable on any NPAEP Wrap Note or PVPG Wrap Note that bears a stated annual interest rate in excess of that amount; (b) remove certain of the properties secured by the NPAEP and PVPG Wrap Mortgages from the burden of the cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions currently contemplated by the Restructuring Agreement effective as of January 1, 1990 by and among MLPG, NPAMLP, National Property Analysts, Inc. and others; and (c) agree to release the lien of the Wrap Mortgages from the Properties upon a sale of or the agreement of a leasehold estate in any Property prior to the maturity of the applicable Wrap Note. In consideration for the above, NPAMLP will modify the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages to provide that (i) there is an event of default under the applicable NPAEP Wrap Mortgages or PVPG Wrap Mortgages, as the case may be, if a judgment or other lien is entered against the title or lease-holding entity thereby entitling NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, to avail itself of the post-default rights or remedies under the relevant security document; and (ii) for cross-default and cross-collateralization among the Unaudited Partnerships and, separately, among the Audited Partnerships. In addition NPAMLP shall execute and deliver to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, a currently recordable deed of future interest (or assignment of future leasehold interest) sufficient to convey to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, all of NPAMLP’s right, title, interest and estate in and to its fee or leasehold interest in the encumbered properties effective upon the maturity on December 31, 2013 of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages unless the Wrap Mortgages have previously been paid in full.

23In March 2003 NPAMLP and the Pension Groups entered into an Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2003 (the “2003 Agreement”), in which the Pension Groups agreed with NPAMLP to modify the terms of Wrap Mortgages held by the Pension Groups. The terms of the 2003 Agreement provided that the Pension Groups: (a) reduce to 4.1% per year the annual interest rate payable on any NPAEP Wrap Note or PVPG Wrap Note that bears a stated annual interest rate in excess of that amount; (b) remove certain of the properties secured by the NPAEP and PVPG Wrap Mortgages from the burden of the cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions currently contemplated by the Restructuring Agreement effective as of January 1, 1990 by and among MLPG, NPAMLP, National Property Analysts, Inc. and others; and (c) agree to release the lien of the Wrap Mortgages from the Properties upon a sale of or the agreement of a leasehold estate in any Property prior to the maturity of the applicable Wrap Note. In consideration for the above, the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages were modified to provide that (i) there is an event of default under the applicable NPAEP Wrap Mortgages or PVPG Wrap Mortgages, as the case may be, if a judgment or other lien is entered against the title or lease-holding entity thereby entitling NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, to avail itself of the post-default rights or remedies under the relevant security document; and (ii) for cross-default and cross-collateralization among the Unaudited Partnerships and, separately, among the Audited Partnerships. In addition NPAMLP shall execute and deliver to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, a currently recordable deed of future interest (or assignment of future leasehold interest) sufficient to convey to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, all of NPAMLP’s right, title, interest and estate in and to its fee or leasehold interest in the encumbered properties effective upon the maturity on December 31, 2013 of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages unless the Wrap Mortgages have previously been paid in full.

The Managing General Partner believes that the execution and delivery of the 2003 Agreement will have the following effects for NPAMLP: as a result of the reduction in the annual interest rate on the NPAEP Wrap Notes and the PVPG Wrap Notes (i) NPAMLP expects to realize significant reductions in interest that it otherwise would have been obligated to pay during the period between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2013 when these loans mature and (ii) NPAMLP will be able to allocate a greater portion of its available cash flow to principal repayments. As a result of the faster repayment of principal, the Limited Partners will recognize additional taxable income (or smaller tax losses) in each year from 2003 until the maturity of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages. In addition, the anticipated date of dissolution of NPAMLP will now occur in 2013 rather than 2015. Further, because the reduced interest rate is below the Applicable Federal Rate (“AFR”) prescribed under Section 1274 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, investors in Unaudited Partnerships recognized non-recurring ordinary income (forgiveness of indebtedness) 2003. The tax impact of this recognition depended upon numerous factors related to each investor’s particular tax situation, including his marginal tax rate and his suspended passive losses from prior years.20

~~Under~~The ~~the~~Managing ~~terms~~General Partner ofbelieves that the ~~Restructuring~~execution ~~Agreement, all Wrap Mortgages owned by NPAEP or PVPG are due~~ and ~~payable~~delivery ~~in substantial “balloon” amounts on December 31, 2013. Assuming no sales~~ of ~~Properties by NPAMLP in~~ the ~~interim~~2003 ~~period~~Agreement ~~(2011~~has ~~through~~had ~~2013)~~ the ~~projected~~following ~~balance~~effects ~~due~~ for ~~all~~NPAMLP: ofas ~~the~~a ~~Wrap~~result ~~Mortgages~~of the atreduction ~~December 31, 2013 is expected to approximate $109,000,000. As described above,~~ in ~~return for~~ the ~~reduction~~annual in interest rate ~~and~~on ~~other~~the ~~consideration~~NPAEP ~~set~~Wrap ~~forth~~Notes ~~above,~~and ~~including~~ the ~~satisfaction~~PVPG ~~of the~~ Wrap ~~Mortgages~~Notes ~~due~~(i) ~~on December 31, 2013,~~ NPAMLP’s ~~general partner~~ has ~~agreed~~realized toreductions ~~deliver~~in interest ~~deeds~~expense ofthat ~~future~~it ~~interest~~otherwise ~~and~~would ~~assignments~~have ofbeen ~~leasehold~~obligated ~~interest,~~ to bepay ~~recorded~~during ~~currently,~~the ~~effective~~period ~~December~~between ~~31,~~January ~~2013~~1, to2003 ~~NPAEP~~ and ~~PVPG. NPAMLP’s~~December ~~general~~31, 2013 ~~partner~~when ~~has~~these ~~determined~~loans ~~that~~mature itand is(ii) ~~in the best interests of~~ NPAMLP ~~and~~has ~~its~~been ~~partners~~able to doallocate ~~so. The~~a ~~effect~~greater portion of ~~these~~its ~~deeds~~available ~~and~~cash ~~assignments~~flow ~~will be~~ to ~~facilitate~~principal repayments. As a ~~transfer~~result of ~~fee~~the ~~and~~faster ~~leasehold~~repayment ~~ownership~~of toprincipal, the ~~holders~~Limited ofPartners ~~the~~have ~~Wrap~~recognized ~~Mortgages~~additional attaxable ~~maturity~~income (~~unless~~or smaller ~~the~~tax ~~Wrap~~losses) ~~Mortgages have been previously paid~~ in ~~full). Notwithstanding~~each ~~the~~year ~~foregoing,~~from ~~NPAEP and PVPG have agreed in the~~ 2003 ~~Agreement~~until ~~to (a) release~~ the ~~liens~~maturity of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and ~~(b)~~the ~~deliver~~PVPG ~~such~~Wrap ~~deeds~~Mortgages. ofIn ~~future interest~~addition, the ~~assignments~~anticipated date of ~~leasehold~~dissolution ~~interests,~~of orNPAMLP ~~other~~will ~~documents~~now oroccur ~~instruments~~in as2013 ~~are~~rather ~~necessary~~than to2015. ~~facilitate~~Further, orbecause ~~effect such sales of~~ the ~~Properties~~reduced ~~prior~~interest torate is ~~December~~below ~~31, 2013 as~~ the ~~Managing~~Applicable ~~General~~Federal ~~Partner~~Rate ~~shall~~(“AFR”) ~~otherwise~~prescribed ~~deem~~under ~~desirable. The~~Section ~~costs~~1274 ~~incurred~~of ~~arising from~~ the ~~recordation~~Internal ofRevenue ~~any~~Code of ~~the~~1986, ~~documents~~as amended, ~~described~~investors in ~~the~~Unaudited ~~2003~~Partnerships ~~Agreement~~recognized ~~shall~~non-recurring beordinary ~~borne~~income by(forgiveness ~~NPAEP~~of orindebtedness) ~~PVPG,~~in ~~as the case may be~~2003. The tax ~~Managing~~impact ~~General~~of ~~Partner~~this ~~believes~~recognition ~~that~~depended ~~the~~upon ~~result~~numerous offactors ~~the~~related ~~forgoing actions taken pursuant~~ to ~~the~~each ~~2003~~investor’s ~~Agreement~~particular ~~will~~tax ~~preserve all rights of the Limited Partners under the Restructuring Agreement~~situation, including his ~~their~~marginal ~~right~~tax torate ~~share~~and inhis ~~certain~~suspended ~~sales~~passive ~~proceeds~~losses orfrom ~~cash flows~~ prior ~~to maturity of the Wrap Mortgages~~years.

~~Item~~Under the 7terms of the Restructuring Agreement, all Wrap Mortgages owned by the Pension Groups are due and payable in substantial “balloon” amounts on December 31, 2013. Assuming no sales of Properties by NPAMLP in the interim period (2012 through 2013) the projected balance due for all of the Wrap Mortgages at December 31, 2013 is expected to approximate $109,000,000. As described above, in return for the reduction in interest rate and other consideration set forth above, including the satisfaction of the Wrap Mortgages due on December 31, 2013, NPAMLP’s general partner has agreed to deliver deeds of future interest and assignments of leasehold interest, to be recorded currently, effective December 31, 2013, to the Pension Groups. NPAMLP’s general partner has determined that it is in the best interests of NPAMLP and its partners to do so. The effect of these deeds and assignments will be to facilitate a transfer of fee and leasehold ownership to the holders of the Wrap Mortgages at maturity (unless the Wrap Mortgages have been previously paid in full). ~~Quantitative~~ Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Pension Groups have agreed in the 2003 Agreement to (a) release the liens of the Wrap Mortgages and ~~Qualitative~~(b) ~~Disclosures~~deliver ~~About~~such ~~Market~~deeds ~~Risk~~of future interest, assignments of leasehold interests, or other documents or instruments as are necessary to facilitate or effect such sales of the Properties prior to December 31, 2013 as the Managing General Partner shall otherwise deem desirable. The costs incurred arising from the recordation of any of the documents described in the 2003 Agreement shall be borne by the Pension Groups. The Managing General Partner believes that the result of the forgoing actions taken pursuant to the 2003 Agreement will preserve all rights of the Limited Partners under the Restructuring Agreement, including their right to share in certain sales proceeds or cash flows prior to maturity of the Wrap Mortgages.

~~Not~~As ~~applicable~~noted above, under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, NPAMLP is scheduled to dissolve on December 31, 2013. The remaining NPAMLP assets not subject to the 2003 Agreement will be liquidated and used to satisfy NPAMLP obligations other than the Wrap Mortgages. To the extent that the remaining assets exceed the amount of the remaining obligations, that excess will be distributed to the Limited Partners in accordance with their ownership interests. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute any excess proceeds from the liquidation of its assets to the Limited Partners upon its dissolution. To the extent that the remaining obligations exceed the amount of the remaining assets, then the proceeds of the remaining assets will be used to satisfy NPAMLP obligations other than the Wrap Mortgages on a pro-rata basis or on such other basis as may be required by law.

Item 87(A). ~~Financial~~ ~~Statements~~Quantitative and ~~Supplementary~~Qualitative Disclosures ~~Data~~About Market Risk

~~The~~Not ~~combined financial statements, including the notes thereto and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K~~applicable.

Item 98. ~~Changes~~ inFinancial ~~and~~Statements ~~Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting~~ and ~~Financial~~Supplementary ~~Disclosure~~Data

~~None~~The combined financial statements, including the notes thereto and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

Item ~~9A: Controls~~ 9. Changes in and ~~Procedures~~Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

~~Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting~~None. It is the responsibility of the General Partner to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Managing General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of NPAMLP; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of NPAMLP are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Managing General Partner; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NPAMLP’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

2421

~~Because~~Item ~~of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements~~9(A). Controls ~~Also,~~and projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.Procedures

~~Management~~Disclosure Controls ~~assessed~~and Procedures: As of the ~~effectiveness~~end of the ~~NPAMLP’s~~period ~~internal~~covered ~~control~~by ~~over~~this ~~financial~~report, ~~reporting~~management atperformed, ~~December~~with 31the participation of the Equity General Partner, ~~2010.~~Managing General Partner and Chief Financial Officer of EBL&S Property Management, ~~based~~Inc, ~~this~~an evaluation ~~assessment~~of onthe ~~criteria~~effectiveness ~~for~~of ~~effective~~our ~~internal~~disclosure ~~control~~controls ~~over~~and ~~financial~~procedures ~~reporting~~as ~~described~~defined in ~~“Internal~~Exchange ~~Control~~Act –Rules 13a-15. ~~Integrated~~NPAMLP’s disclosure ~~Framework”~~controls ~~issued~~and byprocedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the ~~Committee~~reports ofit ~~Sponsoring~~files ~~Organizations~~or ofsubmits under the ~~Treadway~~Exchange ~~Commission.~~Act ~~Management’s~~are ~~assessment~~recorded, ~~included~~processed, ansummarized ~~evaluation~~and ofreported within the ~~design~~time ofperiods specified ~~NPAMLP~~in the SEC’s ~~internal~~rules ~~control~~and ~~over~~forms, ~~financial~~and ~~reporting~~that such information is accumulated and communicated ~~testing~~to ofmanagement, including the ~~operational~~Equity ~~effectiveness~~General Partner, Managing General Partner and Chief Financial Officer of ~~its~~EBL&S Property ~~internal~~Management, ~~control~~Inc., ~~over~~to ~~financial~~allow ~~reporting~~timely decisions regarding required disclosures. ~~Management~~Based ~~reviewed~~on the ~~results~~evaluation, ofmanagement ~~its~~concluded that ~~assessment~~NPAMLP’s ~~with~~disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the ~~Managing~~year ~~General~~ended ~~Partner~~December 31, 2011.

~~Based~~Management's Report on ~~its~~Internal ~~assessment,~~Control ~~management~~over ~~determined~~Financial ~~that,~~Reporting. atIt ~~December~~is 31the responsibility of the General Partner to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, ~~2010~~as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ~~NPAMLP~~as ~~maintained~~amended. ~~effective~~The Managing General Partner’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external ~~reporting~~ purposes in accordance with ~~generally accepted~~ accounting principles~~. There~~ ~~has~~generally ~~been~~accepted noin ~~change~~the inUnited ~~internal~~States ~~controls~~of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that ~~occurred~~(i) pertain ~~during~~to the ~~quarter~~maintenance ~~ended~~of ~~December~~records that ~~31,~~in ~~2010~~reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of NPAMLP; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that ~~has~~transactions ~~materially~~are ~~affected~~recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, orand isthat ~~reasonably~~receipts ~~likely~~and toexpenditures ~~materially~~of ~~affect~~NPAMLP are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Managing General Partner; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NPAMLP'’s ~~internal~~assets ~~control~~that ~~over~~could have a material effect on the financial ~~reporting~~statements.

~~This~~Because ~~annual~~of ~~report~~its ~~does~~inherent limitations, ~~not~~internal ~~include~~control anover ~~attestation~~financial ~~report~~reporting ofmay ~~NPAMLP's~~not ~~registered~~prevent ~~public~~or ~~accounting~~detect ~~firm~~misstatements. ~~regarding~~Also, ~~internal~~projections ~~control~~of ~~over~~any ~~financial~~evaluation of ~~reporting.~~effectiveness ~~Management's~~to ~~report~~future ~~was~~periods ~~not~~are subject to ~~attestation~~the byrisk ~~NPAMLP’s~~that ~~registered~~controls ~~public~~may ~~accounting~~become ~~firm~~inadequate ~~pursuant~~because ~~to the final rule~~ of ~~the~~changes ~~Securities~~in ~~and~~conditions, or ~~Exchange Commission~~ that ~~permits~~the ~~NPAMLP~~degree toof ~~provide~~compliance ~~only~~with ~~management's~~the ~~report~~policies inor ~~this~~procedures ~~annual~~may ~~report~~deteriorate.

~~Item~~Management ~~9(B)~~assessed the effectiveness of the NPAMLP’s internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2011. ~~Other~~Management ~~Information~~based this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of NPAMLP’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Managing General Partner.

~~None~~Based on its assessment, management determined that, at December 31, 2011, NPAMLP maintained effective internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. There has been no change in internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NPAMLP's internal control over financial reporting.

25This annual report does not include an attestation report of NPAMLP's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by NPAMLP’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the final rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits NPAMLP to provide only management's report in this annual report.

~~PART~~Item ~~III~~9(B). Other Information

~~Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance~~None

~~I. Summary~~22

~~EBL&S,~~PART Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated in December 1989, and an affiliate of NPA, is the Managing General Partner of NPAMLP. Feldman International, Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated in September 1998 is the Equity General Partner of NPAMLP. The Managing General Partner is owned 100% by E&H Properties, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation incorporated in July 1979, which is owned 100% by Edward B. Lipkin. The Equity General Partner is owned 100% by Robert McKinney.III

~~The~~Item ~~directors~~10. Directors and ~~executive~~Executive ~~officers~~Officers ofand ~~the~~Corporate ~~General Partners are as follows:~~Governance

~~Edward B~~I. Lipkin, age 65, serves as Director of the Managing General Partner. Mr. Lipkin has also been President of NPA since it was organized in 1976. Mr. Lipkin received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from Temple University. Mr. Lipkin was a Trustee of the International Council of Shopping Centers, a leading industry organization, from 1986 to 1992.Summary

~~Robert McKinney~~EBL&S, ~~age 55~~Inc., ~~serves~~a Delaware ascorporation ~~Director~~incorporated ofin ~~the~~December ~~Equity General Partner. Since 2003~~1989, ~~Mr.~~and ~~McKinney has been~~ an ~~employee~~affiliate of ~~NPAEP~~NPA, ~~serving~~is asthe ~~tax~~Managing ~~manager~~General Partner of NPAMLP. ~~Previously~~Feldman International, MrInc., ~~McKinney~~a ~~had~~Delaware ~~been~~corporation ~~employed~~incorporated byin ~~NPA~~September ~~since~~1998 ~~1987~~is in the ~~same~~Equity ~~capacity.~~General ~~Mr.~~Partner ~~McKinney,~~of aNPAMLP. ~~certified~~The ~~public~~Managing General ~~accountant,~~Partner ~~received~~is aowned ~~Masters~~100% ofby ~~Science~~E&H inProperties, ~~Taxation~~Inc., ~~and~~a ~~Masters~~Pennsylvania ofcorporation ~~Business~~incorporated ~~Administration~~ in ~~Finance~~July ~~from~~1979, ~~Villanova~~which ~~University~~is ~~and~~owned 100% ~~Temple~~by ~~University,~~Edward ~~respectively~~B. Mr Lipkin. ~~McKinney~~The ~~received~~Equity aGeneral ~~Bachelor~~Partner ofis ~~Science~~owned ~~degree~~100% inby ~~Accounting~~Robert ~~from Villanova University~~McKinney.

~~Howard~~The M.directors ~~Levy,~~and ~~age~~executive ~~52, serves as Vice President~~ officers of the ~~Managing~~ General ~~Partner. Mr.~~Partners ~~Levy~~are ~~has~~as been employed by NPA since 1983 and is currently Vice President of Leasing. Mr. Levy received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Scranton and is a Certified Public Accountant.follows:

~~David~~Edward AB. ~~Simon~~Lipkin, age 53 66, serves as ~~Vice~~Director ~~President~~ of the Managing General Partner. Mr. ~~Simon~~Lipkin has also been ~~employed~~President byof NPA since ~~1987~~it ~~and~~was isorganized ~~currently~~in ~~Chief Financial Officer~~1976. Mr. ~~Simon~~Lipkin received a Bachelor of Science degree in ~~Accounting &~~ Finance from ~~Lehigh~~Temple University. ~~and~~Mr. isLipkin was a ~~Certified~~Trustee ~~Public~~of ~~Accountant~~the International Council of Shopping Centers, a leading industry organization, from 1986 to 1992.

IIRobert McKinney, age 56, serves as Director of the Equity General Partner. ~~Code~~ Since 2003, Mr. McKinney has been an employee of ~~Ethics~~NPAEP, serving as tax manager. Previously, Mr. McKinney had been employed by NPA since 1987 in the same capacity. Mr. McKinney, a certified public accountant, received a Masters of Science in Taxation and Masters of Business Administration in Finance from Villanova University and Temple University, respectively. Mr. McKinney received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Villanova University.

InHoward ~~view~~M. ofLevy, ~~the~~age 53, ~~fiduciary~~serves ~~obligation~~as ~~that~~Vice President of the Managing General Partner. ~~has~~Mr. toLevy ~~NPAMLP,~~has ~~the~~been ~~Managing~~employed ~~General~~by ~~Partner~~NPA ~~believes~~since an1983 ~~adoption~~and ofis acurrently ~~formal~~Vice President ~~code~~ of ~~ethics~~Leasing. isMr. ~~unnecessary~~Levy ~~and~~received ~~would~~a ~~not~~Bachelor ~~benefit~~of ~~NPAMLP,~~Science ~~particularly,~~degree in ~~light~~Accounting from the University of ~~NPAMLP’s~~Scranton ~~limited~~and ~~business~~is ~~activities~~a Certified Public Accountant.

~~III~~David A. ~~Audit~~Simon, ~~Committee~~age 54, serves as Vice President of the Managing General Partner. Mr. Simon has been employed by NPA since 1987 and is currently Chief Financial ~~Expert~~Officer. Mr. Simon received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting & Finance from Lehigh University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

~~The Managing General Partner does not have an audit committee financial expert, as defined under Section 228~~II.~~401,~~ ~~serving~~Code onof ~~its audit committee because it has no audit committee, and is not required to have an audit committee because it is not a listed security as defined in Section 240.10A-3.~~Ethics

~~Item~~In ~~11. Executive~~view ~~Compensation~~of the fiduciary obligation that the Managing General Partner has to NPAMLP, the Managing General Partner believes an adoption of a formal code of ethics is unnecessary and would not benefit NPAMLP, particularly, in light of NPAMLP’s limited business activities.

IIII. ~~General~~Audit Committee Financial Expert

~~Neither~~The ~~the~~Managing General Partner ~~Partners~~does ~~nor~~not ~~the~~have ~~officers~~an ofaudit ~~the~~committee ~~General~~financial ~~Partners receive compensation from NPAMLP. Certain administrative services related to tax and accounting service~~expert, ~~legal matters and to investor administration were performed by the Managing General Partner on behalf of NPAMLP~~ as ~~provided~~defined inunder ~~the~~Section ~~Partnership Agreement~~228. ~~The~~401, ~~amount~~serving ~~payable~~on toits ~~the~~audit ~~Managing~~committee ~~General~~because it ~~Partner~~has ~~for~~no ~~such~~audit ~~services aggregated $203~~committee,~~000~~ and ~~$191,000~~is ~~for~~not ~~the~~required ~~years~~to ~~ended~~have ~~December~~an ~~31,~~audit ~~2010~~committee ~~and~~because ~~2009,~~it ~~respectively. See~~is ~~“Item~~not ~~13.~~a ~~Certain~~listed ~~Relationships~~security ~~and~~as ~~Related~~defined ~~Transactions~~in Section 240.10A- I3. ~~Compensation and Fees and II. Property Management by Affiliate.”~~

IIItem 11. ~~Payments~~ ~~Discussion~~Executive ~~and Analysis~~Compensation

~~NPAMLP has no compensation plan as it pays no executive compensation and therefore the compensation discussion and analysis is unnecessary~~I. General

26Neither the General Partners nor the officers of the General Partners receive compensation from NPAMLP. Certain administrative services related to tax and accounting service, legal matters and to investor administration were performed by the Managing General Partner on behalf of NPAMLP as provided in the Partnership Agreement. The amount payable to the Managing General Partner for such services aggregated $165,000 and $226,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - I. Compensation and Fees and II. Property Management by Affiliate.”

~~Item 12~~II. Payments ~~Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners~~ Discussion and ~~Management and Related Stockholder Matters~~Analysis

	NAME & ADDRESS OF	AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
TITLE OF CLASS	BENEFICIAL OWNER	BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP	% OF CLASS
Units of Limited	Robert McKinney	1,000 Units		1.0	%
Partnership Interest	230 S. Broad Street
	Mezzanine Level
	Philadelphia, PA 19102

NPAMLP has no compensation plan as it pays no executive compensation and therefore the compensation discussion and analysis is unnecessary.

~~Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence~~23

IItem 12. ~~Compensation~~ Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and ~~Fees~~Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The amounts and kinds of payments and fees to be paid to the General Partners and its affiliates during the operation of NPAMLP are summarized below. All expenses of NPAMLP are billed directly to and paid by NPAMLP. The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for the actual cost of goods and materials used for or by NPAMLP and obtained from entities that are not affiliates of the Managing General Partner. In addition, the Managing General Partner is reimbursed for administrative services performed for NPAMLP, provided that such services are necessary for the prudent operation of NPAMLP and further provided that such reimbursement is at the lower of (i) the Managing General Partner's actual cost or (ii) the cost of obtaining comparable administrative services from independent parties in the same geographic location. Reimbursement to the Managing General Partner for services for which it is entitled to compensation by way of a separate fee is not allowed. No reimbursement is made for rent, depreciation, utilities, or capital equipment in the building in which NPAMLP maintains offices and other overhead costs.

	NAME & ADDRESS OF	AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
TITLE OF CLASS	BENEFICIAL OWNER	BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP	% OF CLASS

Units of Limited	Robert McKinney	1,000 Units	1.0%
Partnership Interest	230 S. Broad Street
	Mezzanine Level
	Philadelphia, PA 19102

Entity Receiving Payments	Type of Payments	Estimated Amount of Payments
	Organizational Phase
Equity General Partner		1% general partners’ interest in NPAMLP.
	Operational Phase
Equity General Partner	General Partners’ Share of Cash Flow from Operations.	On an annual basis, 1% of cash flow from operations. Actual amounts will depend upon future operations and are not now determinable.
EBL&S Property Management, Inc.	Property Management Fees	Annual fee of 5% of gross operating revenues derived from the Properties. Actual amounts will depend upon future operations and are not now determinable. See “II. Property Management by Affiliate”, below.
EBL&S Property Management, Inc.	Leasing Fees	For all obtained or renewed leases, an amount equal to the fees customarily charged in the geographic area of leased property. Actual amounts will depend upon future operations and are not now determinable. See “II. Property Management by Affiliate”, below.
Equity General Partner	General Partners’ Share of Profits and Losses	The Equity General Partner will be allocated 1% of the profits and losses from NPAMLP operations.
Managing General Partner	Reimbursement of Expenses	Actual cost of goods and services utilized for or by NPAMLP, including certain administrative services performed by the Managing General Partner.
	Liquidation Phase
Equity General Partner	General Partners’ share of Proceeds of Sales of the Properties.	The Equity General Partner will be allocated 1% of the proceeds of the sale of the properties.
E&H Properties	Repayment of Indebtedness secured by Second Mortgages.	Actual amounts will depend on the price of Properties and are not now determinable.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, Director Independence

27I. Compensation and Fees

IIThe amounts and kinds of payments and fees to be paid to the General Partners and its affiliates during the operation of NPAMLP are summarized below. ~~Property~~ All ~~Management~~expenses of NPAMLP are billed directly to and paid by ~~Affiliate~~NPAMLP. The Managing General Partner is reimbursed for the actual cost of goods and materials used for or by NPAMLP and obtained from entities that are not affiliates of the Managing General Partner. In addition, the Managing General Partner is reimbursed for administrative services performed for NPAMLP, provided that such services are necessary for the prudent operation of NPAMLP and further provided that such reimbursement is at the lower of (i) the Managing General Partner's actual cost or (ii) the cost of obtaining comparable administrative services from independent parties in the same geographic location. Reimbursement to the Managing General Partner for services for which it is entitled to compensation by way of a separate fee is not allowed. No reimbursement is made for rent, depreciation, utilities, or capital equipment in the building in which NPAMLP maintains offices and other overhead costs.

As of January 1, 1990, NPAMLP entered into a management agreement with EBL&S Property Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Property Manager”), with respect to the management of the Properties (“Management Agreement”). EBL&S Property Management, Inc. is owned 100% by E&H Properties, Inc., which also is the sole shareholder of NPAMLP's Managing General Partner, EBL&S, Inc. The directors of EBL&S Property Management, Inc. are the same as those of the Managing General Partner. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Property Manager receives a management fee equal to five (5%) percent of all gross operating revenues derived from the Properties payable as and when such income is received, plus a leasing fee for all obtained or renewed leases equal to the fees customarily charged in the geographic area of the leased property, payable as customary in such area. The Property Manager earned an aggregate of approximately $563,000 for management fees, approximately $14,000 for leasing commissions, and approximately $226,000 for administrative and legal fees in fiscal year 2010. In fiscal 2009, the Property Manager earned an aggregate of $572,000 for management fees, $19,000 for leasing commissions and $191,000 for administrative and legal fees.

Entity Receiving Payments	Type of Payments	Estimated Amount of Payments

	Organizational Phase

Equity General Partner		1% general partners’ interest in NPAMLP.

	Operational Phase

Equity General Partner	General Partners’ Share of Cash Flow from Operations.	On an annual basis, 1% of cash flow from operations. Actual amounts will depend upon future operations and are not now determinable.

EBL&S Property Management, Inc.	Property Management Fees	Annual fee of 5% of gross operating revenues derived from the Properties. Actual amounts will depend upon future operations and are not now determinable. See “II. Property Management by Affiliate”, below.

EBL&S Property Management, Inc.	Leasing Fees	For all obtained or renewed leases, an amount equal to the fees customarily charged in the geographic area of leased property. Actual amounts will depend upon future operations and are not now determinable. See “II. Property Management by Affiliate”, below.

Equity General Partner	General Partners’ Share of Profits and Losses	The Equity General Partner will be allocated 1% of the profits and losses from NPAMLP operations.

Managing General Partner	Reimbursement of Expenses	Actual cost of goods and services utilized for or by NPAMLP, including certain administrative services performed by the Managing General Partner.

	Liquidation Phase

Equity General Partner	General Partners’ share of Proceeds of Sales of the Properties.	The Equity General Partner will be allocated 1% of the proceeds of the sale of the properties.

E&H Properties	Repayment of Indebtedness secured by Second Mortgages.	Actual amounts will depend on the price of Properties and are not now determinable.

~~III. Conflicts of Interest~~24

~~From~~II. ~~time to time, there may be conflicts of interest between the Managing General Partner and its affiliates (including the~~ Property Manager), and the Equity General Partner, on the one hand and NPAMLP and its Limited Partners on the other hand. The Managing General Partner will attempt to resolve any conflicts of interest by exercising the good faith required of fiduciaries, and the Managing General Partner believes that it will generally be able to resolve conflicts on an equitable basis. Depending on the relevant facts and circumstances, however, the resolution of any particular conflict may not be in favor of NPAMLP. A resolution which is unfavorable to NPAMLP will result only if the Managing General Partner determines in good faith, bearing in mind its fiduciary duties, that it is the most appropriate to deal with the overall situation. See “Item 7. Management's ~~Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - I. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”~~by Affiliate

AAs of January 1, 1990, NPAMLP entered into a management agreement with EBL&S Property Management, Inc., ~~Conflict~~a ~~Regarding~~Delaware ~~Sales~~corporation (“Property Manager”), with respect to the management of the Properties (“Management Agreement”). EBL&S Property Management, Inc. is owned 100% by E&H Properties, Inc., which also is the sole shareholder of NPAMLP's Managing General Partner, EBL&S, Inc. The directors of EBL&S Property Management, Inc. are the same as those of the Managing General Partner. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Property Manager receives a management fee equal to five (5%) percent of all gross operating revenues derived from the Properties payable as and ~~Refinancing~~when such income is received, plus a leasing fee for all obtained or renewed leases equal to the fees customarily charged in the geographic area of the leased property, payable as customary in such area. The Property Manager earned an aggregate of approximately $534,000 for management fees, approximately $8,000 for leasing commissions, and approximately $165,000 for administrative and legal fees in fiscal year 2011. In fiscal 2010, the Property Manager earned an aggregate of $563,000 for management fees, $14,000 for leasing commissions and $226,000 for administrative and legal fees.

~~The Managing General Partner is an affiliate of NPA~~III. ~~NPA~~ orConflicts ~~its affiliates hold the Second Mortgages aggregating approximately $8 million. This lack~~ of ~~independence gives rise to certain conflicts of interest with respect to the sale or refinancing of the Properties.~~Interest

~~The~~From ~~Managing~~time ~~General~~to ~~Partner oversees sales~~time, there ~~leases,~~may ~~financing,~~be ~~operations~~conflicts ~~and~~of ~~management~~interest ofbetween the ~~Properties~~Managing ~~and~~General ~~decides~~Partner ~~which~~and ~~Properties~~its ~~are~~affiliates ~~sold~~(including ~~and~~the ~~how~~Property toManager), ~~apply~~ and the ~~Proceeds~~Equity ofGeneral ~~Sales~~Partner, ofon the ~~Properties. Because~~one ~~NPA~~hand orand ~~its~~NPAMLP ~~affiliates~~and ~~hold~~its ~~the~~Limited ~~Second~~Partners ~~Mortgages~~ on the ~~Properties~~other ~~which~~hand. ~~will~~The beManaging ~~repaid~~General ~~from~~Partner will ~~the~~attempt ~~Proceeds~~to ofresolve ~~Sales~~any conflicts of ~~the~~interest ~~Properties~~by ~~and~~exercising the ~~Managing~~good ~~General~~faith ~~Partner~~required ~~is an affiliate~~ of ~~NPA~~fiduciaries, and the Managing General Partner ~~may~~believes ~~not be solely interested in ensuring~~ that ~~sales~~it ofwill ~~Properties~~generally ~~generate~~be ~~sufficient~~able ~~proceeds~~ to ~~enable~~resolve ~~the~~conflicts ~~Limited~~on ~~Partners~~an toequitable ~~receive distributions with respect thereto~~basis. ~~However,~~ ~~pursuant~~Depending toon the ~~Restructuring~~relevant ~~Agreement~~facts and circumstances, ahowever, ~~portion of all proceeds derived from sale of~~ the ~~Properties~~resolution ~~in excess~~ of ~~the~~any ~~Threshold~~particular ~~Amount~~conflict ~~will~~may not be ~~applied~~ in ~~payment~~favor of ~~the Wrap Mortgages~~NPAMLP. ~~Accordingly,~~ ~~the~~A ~~Managing~~resolution ~~General~~which ~~Partner~~is ~~(as an affiliate of NPA) will have a financial incentive~~ unfavorable to ~~cause~~ NPAMLP towill ~~maximize~~result ~~Proceeds~~only ofif ~~Sales of~~ the ~~Properties. Furthermore, the~~ Managing General Partner isdetermines ~~accountable~~in togood ~~NPAMLP~~faith, ~~and~~bearing ~~the~~in ~~Limited~~mind ~~Partners~~its ~~as a~~ fiduciary ~~and~~duties, ~~consequently,~~that it ~~must~~is ~~exercise~~the ~~good~~most ~~faith~~appropriate ~~and~~to ~~integrity~~deal inwith ~~handling~~ the ~~affairs~~overall ofsituation. ~~NPAMLP~~See ~~and~~“Item ~~must~~7. ~~take~~Management's ~~its~~Discussion ~~Limited~~and ~~Partners'~~Analysis ~~interests~~of inFinancial Condition ~~account~~and inResults ~~making~~of ~~decisions~~Operations ~~regarding~~- ~~sales~~I. Liquidity and ~~refinancing~~Capital Resources.”

BA. ~~Other~~ ~~Activities~~Conflict ofRegarding ~~the~~Sales ~~Affiliates~~and ~~of the General Partners~~Refinancing

~~There~~The isManaging ~~no limitation on the right of the affiliates of the~~ General Partner ~~Partners to engage in any business even if the business~~ is ~~competitive with the business of NPAMLP. For instance, if~~ an affiliate of ~~the~~NPA. ~~General~~NPA ~~Partners owns~~ or ~~manages~~its aaffiliates ~~property~~hold ~~which~~the ~~competes~~Second ~~for~~Mortgages ~~tenants~~aggregating ~~with~~approximately a$5 ~~Property~~million. ~~owned~~This bylack of ~~NPAMLP,~~independence ~~the~~gives ~~economic~~rise ~~interest~~to ofcertain ~~the~~conflicts ~~equity owners~~ of ~~the~~interest ~~General Partners in that affiliate may create a conflict between the General Partners or the Property Manager on the one hand and NPAMLP on the other~~ with respect to ~~allocating prospective tenants between competitive properties. The Managing General Partner and its affiliates presently own one property that is competitive with~~ the ~~Properties,~~sale ~~and~~or ~~affiliates~~refinancing of the ~~Managing General Partner may act as manager of such properties~~Properties.

28The Managing General Partner oversees sales, leases, financing, operations and management of the Properties and decides which Properties are sold and how to apply the Proceeds of Sales of the Properties. Because NPA or its affiliates hold the Second Mortgages on the Properties which will be repaid from the Proceeds of Sales of the Properties and the Managing General Partner is an affiliate of NPA, the Managing General Partner may not be solely interested in ensuring that sales of Properties generate sufficient proceeds to enable the Limited Partners to receive distributions with respect thereto. However, pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, a portion of all proceeds derived from sale of the Properties in excess of the Threshold Amount will be applied in payment of the Wrap Mortgages. Accordingly, the Managing General Partner (as an affiliate of NPA) will have a financial incentive to cause NPAMLP to maximize Proceeds of Sales of the Properties. Furthermore, the Managing General Partner is accountable to NPAMLP and the Limited Partners as a fiduciary and, consequently, must exercise good faith and integrity in handling the affairs of NPAMLP and must take its Limited Partners' interests in account in making decisions regarding sales and refinancing.

CB. ~~Competition~~Other byActivities of ~~NPAMLP~~the ~~with~~ Affiliates of the ~~Managing~~ General ~~Partner for Services of Officers and Employees~~Partners

~~NPAMLP~~There ~~depends~~is no limitation on the ~~Managing~~right of the affiliates of the General ~~Partner~~Partners to ~~operate~~engage in any business even if the business is competitive with the business of NPAMLP. ~~The~~ ~~Managing~~For ~~General~~instance, ~~Partner~~if ~~believes~~an itaffiliate ~~will~~of ~~have~~the ~~sufficient~~General ~~staff~~Partners ~~personnel~~owns ~~and~~or ~~resources~~manages toa ~~perform~~property ~~all~~which ofcompetes ~~its~~for ~~duties~~tenants with ~~respect~~a toProperty owned ~~managing~~by NPAMLP~~. However~~, ~~because~~the economic interest of the ~~staff~~equity ~~personnel~~owners ~~and~~of ~~resources~~the ~~are~~General ~~shared~~Partners ~~with~~in ~~affiliates,~~that ~~the~~affiliate ~~Managing~~may create a conflict between the General ~~Partner~~Partners ~~and~~or ~~certain~~the ofProperty ~~its~~Manager ~~affiliates~~on ~~have~~the ~~conflicts~~one ofhand ~~interest~~and inNPAMLP on the ~~allocation~~other ofwith ~~management~~respect ~~and~~to ~~staff~~allocating ~~time,~~prospective ~~services~~tenants between competitive properties. The Managing General Partner and ~~functions~~its ~~among~~affiliates ~~NPAMLP~~presently own one property that is competitive with the Properties, and ~~other~~affiliates ~~entities~~of inthe ~~existence~~Managing orGeneral ~~which~~Partner may beact ~~organized~~as manager of such properties.

~~IV. Summary of Relationships~~25

~~E&H Properties, Inc~~C. Competition ~~owns 100% of the equity interest in EBL&S, Inc. (the Managing General Partner) and EBL&S Property Management, Inc. (the Property Manager). E&H Properties, Inc. is owned 100%~~ by NPAMLP Edward B. Lipkin (Lipkin). Feldman International, Inc. is owned 100% by Robert McKinney, an employee of the Property Manager. The General Partners and the Property Manager both have ongoing relationships with ~~NPAMLP. E&H~~Affiliates ~~Properties, Inc. and the affiliates that it controls are the holders~~ of the ~~Second Mortgages.~~Managing

~~V. Related~~General ~~Party~~Partner ~~Transactions~~for Services of Officers and Employees

~~In June 2006,~~ NPAMLP ~~and~~depends ~~ARJAX~~on ~~entered into an agreement with~~ the Managing ~~anchor~~General ~~tenant~~Partner ~~at the San Mateo property (the “Agreement”), whereby the lease with the anchor tenant would be assigned~~ to ~~NPAMLP~~operate ~~or ARJAX effective February 2009 (the “Effective Date”)~~NPAMLP. In ~~consideration~~The ~~for~~Managing ~~the~~General ~~assignment,~~Partner ~~the~~believes ~~anchor~~it ~~tenant~~will ~~would~~have ~~receive~~sufficient ~~payments~~staff ~~totaling~~personnel ~~$2,550,000~~and ~~during the period from June 2006 through the Effective Date. To date, ARJAX has remitted $1,400,000~~ resources to ~~the~~perform ~~anchor~~all ~~tenant~~of inits ~~accordance~~duties with ~~the~~respect ~~terms of the Agreement. In addition, the anchor tenant will be obligated~~ to ~~complete,~~managing ~~by the Effective Date, $500,000 in repairs or improvements, which would otherwise be the responsibility of~~ NPAMLP~~, to its other stores leased from NPAMLP~~. ~~Under the Agreement~~However, ~~the~~because ~~liability for~~ the ~~consideration~~staff topersonnel ~~the anchor tenant is borne by ARJAX~~ and ~~NPAMLP,~~resources ~~however~~are itshared ~~is anticipated that ARJAX shall fund all of the consideration due. Additionally~~with affiliates, ~~Lipkin has personally guaranteed~~ the ~~obligations~~Managing toGeneral ~~the~~Partner ~~anchor~~and ~~tenant~~certain ~~under~~of ~~the Agreement. There is a possibility, however, that if ARJAX does not perform~~ its ~~obligations~~affiliates ~~under the Agreement, NPAMLP may be held liable. Should ARJAX default, NPAMLP may not~~ have ~~sufficient~~conflicts ~~cash to pay this obligation, it would probably have to sell an asset or assets to raise enough cash to do so. Such sale~~ of ~~assets~~interest ~~could result~~ in ~~additional gain being recognized. In June 2008,~~ the ~~Agreement~~allocation ~~was~~of ~~amended~~management and ~~extending~~staff ~~the Effective Date to January 31~~time, ~~2011.~~services Inand ~~December~~functions ~~2010,~~among ~~the~~NPAMLP ~~Agreement~~and ~~was~~other ~~amended~~entities ~~further~~in ~~extending~~existence ~~the~~or ~~Effective~~which ~~Date~~may tobe ~~February 28, 2014~~organized.

~~In the fourth quarter of 2006, NPAMLP sold its leasehold interest in the San Mateo property to ARJAX~~IV. ~~ARJAX~~Summary intends to convert the San Mateo property into a multi-family development, which would also include retail and office elements. NPAMLP is prohibited from acquiring and developing property and accordingly, could not participate in this development. See “Item 1. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies”. The purchase price for the sale of the leasehold interest was $13,900,000 and was based on the fair market value of NPAMLP’s leasehold interest in the San Mateo property (after taking into consideration the Agreement noted above) as determined by a national valuation firm familiar with similar commercial properties and real estate in the San Mateo geographic area. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement of sale for this transaction, the purchase price was satisfied with the conveyance to NPAMLP of a 14.8% tenant-in-common interest in an office building in San Jose, California (“San Jose Building”).Relationships

ToE&H ~~complete~~Properties, Inc. ~~the~~owns ~~tax-deferred~~100% ~~exchange~~of ~~arising~~the ~~from~~equity ~~the~~interest ~~sales~~in ofEBL&S, Inc. (the ~~New~~Managing ~~Hope,~~General MNPartner) and ~~North~~EBL&S ~~Sarasota,~~Property ~~FL properties~~Management, ~~NPAMLP~~Inc. (the ~~acquired~~Property anManager). ~~additional~~E&H 9Properties, Inc.1% ~~tenant-in-common~~is ~~interest~~owned in100% ~~the~~by ~~San~~Edward ~~Jose Building~~B. ~~All~~Lipkin of(Lipkin). ~~the~~Feldman ~~interests~~International, inInc. ~~the~~is ~~San~~owned 100% ~~Jose Building acquired~~ by ~~NPAMLP~~Robert ~~were~~McKinney, ~~acquired~~an ~~from~~employee ~~National~~of the Property ~~Analysts~~Manager. ~~Management~~The ~~Company~~General ~~(“NPAMC”),~~Partners aand ~~limited~~the ~~partnership~~Property ~~controlled~~Manager byboth ~~Lipkin. As~~have aongoing ~~result~~relationships with ofNPAMLP. ~~the~~E&H ~~conveyance~~Properties, byInc. ~~NPAMC~~and of the ~~tenant-in-common~~affiliates ~~interests,~~that ~~NPAMC~~it ~~recognized~~controls aare ~~gain~~the holders of ~~$300,000,~~the ~~primarily~~Second ~~from depreciation recapture~~Mortgages.

29V. Related Party Transactions

AsIn June ~~the~~2006, ~~term~~NPAMLP ofand ~~the~~ARJAX ~~lease~~entered ofinto an agreement with the anchor tenant ~~occupying~~at the San ~~Jose~~Mateo ~~Building~~property is(the ~~currently~~“Agreement”), whereby ~~scheduled~~the lease with the anchor tenant would be assigned to ~~expire~~NPAMLP ~~before~~or ~~the~~ARJAX ~~financing~~effective onFebruary 2009 (the ~~property~~“Effective isDate”). In ~~satisfied~~consideration for the assignment, the ~~property~~anchor ~~could~~tenant bewould ~~lost~~receive topayments ~~foreclosure~~totaling at$2,550,000 ~~that~~during ~~time~~the period from June 2006 through the Effective Date. InTo ~~order~~date, ARJAX has remitted $1,400,000 to ~~protect~~the ~~NPAMLP’s~~anchor ~~interest~~tenant ~~and~~in toaccordance ~~ensure~~with the ~~value~~terms of the Agreement. ~~consideration~~In ~~received~~addition, the anchor tenant will be obligated to complete, by ~~NPAMLP~~the Effective Date, $500,000 in ~~exchange~~repairs ~~for~~or improvements, which would otherwise be the ~~leasehold~~responsibility ~~interest~~of NPAMLP, ~~NPAMC~~to ~~caused~~its ~~NPAEP~~other tostores ~~agree~~leased tofrom ~~modify~~NPAMLP. As of December 31, 2011 the ~~terms~~Anchor Tenant ofhas completed the ~~wrap~~required ~~mortgage~~$500,000 byin ~~offsetting~~repairs. Under the ~~wrap~~Agreement, ~~indebtedness~~the ~~held~~liability byfor ~~NPAEP~~the consideration to the anchor tenant is borne by anARJAX ~~amount~~and ~~equal~~NPAMLP, however it is anticipated that ARJAX shall fund all of the consideration due. Additionally, Lipkin has personally guaranteed the obligations to the ~~greater~~anchor ~~of:~~tenant ~~(1)~~under the ~~proceeds~~Agreement. ~~from~~There is ~~disposition~~a orpossibility, ~~(2)~~however, that if ARJAX does not perform its obligations under the ~~$13~~Agreement,~~900~~ NPAMLP may be held liable. Should ARJAX default,~~000~~ ~~purchase~~NPAMLP ~~price~~may ~~compounded~~not ~~monthly~~have ~~based~~sufficient oncash ato 6pay this obligation, it would probably have to sell an asset or assets to raise enough cash to do so.~~43%~~ ~~annual~~Such ~~interest~~sale ~~rate~~of assets could result in additional gain being recognized. ~~The~~In ~~wrap~~June ~~mortgage~~2008, ~~offset~~the ~~would~~Agreement was beamended ~~calculated~~extending atthe Effective Date to January 31, 2011. In December 2010, the ~~time~~Agreement ofwas ~~disposition~~amended offurther extending the Effective ~~San~~Date ~~Jose~~to ~~Building~~February 28, 2014.

VIIn the fourth quarter of 2006, NPAMLP sold its leasehold interest in the San Mateo property to ARJAX. ~~Director~~ ~~Independence~~ARJAX intends to convert the San Mateo property into a multi-family development, which would also include retail and office elements. NPAMLP is prohibited from acquiring and developing property and accordingly, could not participate in this development. See “Item 1. NPAMLP Objectives and Policies”. The purchase price for the sale of the leasehold interest was $13,900,000 and was based on the fair market value of NPAMLP’s leasehold interest in the San Mateo property (after taking into consideration the Agreement noted above) as determined by a national valuation firm familiar with similar commercial properties and real estate in the San Mateo geographic area. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement of sale for this transaction, the purchase price was satisfied with the conveyance to NPAMLP of a 14.8% tenant-in-common interest in an office building in San Jose, California (“San Jose Building”).

~~NPAMLP~~To ~~has~~complete nothe ~~separate~~tax-deferred exchange ~~nominating,~~arising ~~audit~~from orthe ~~compensation~~sales ~~committees~~of ~~because~~the inNew ~~part~~Hope, itMN isand ~~not~~North ~~required~~Sarasota, toFL ~~do so~~properties, ~~but~~NPAMLP ~~also~~acquired ~~because~~an noadditional ~~compensation~~9.1% istenant-in-common interest ~~paid~~in ~~and~~the ~~there~~San ~~are~~Jose ~~no directors~~Building. All of the interests in the San Jose Building acquired by NPAMLP ~~has~~were ~~limited~~acquired ~~business~~from ~~activities~~National Property ~~and~~Analysts ~~its~~Management ~~day~~Company to(“NPAMC”), ~~day~~a ~~activities~~limited ~~are~~partnership ~~run~~controlled by Lipkin. As a result of the ~~Managing~~conveyance by ~~General~~NPAMC ~~Partner~~of ~~and~~the ~~EBL&S~~tenant-in-common ~~Property~~interests, ~~Management~~NPAMC ~~Inc~~recognized a gain of $300,000, primarily from depreciation recapture.

~~Item~~As 14the term of the lease of the tenant occupying the San Jose Building is currently scheduled to expire before the financing on the property is satisfied, the property could be lost to foreclosure at that time. ~~Principal~~ ~~Accounting~~In ~~Fees~~order to protect NPAMLP’s interest and ~~Services~~to ensure the value of the consideration received by NPAMLP in exchange for the leasehold interest, NPAMC caused NPAEP to agree to modify the terms of the wrap mortgage by offsetting the wrap indebtedness held by NPAEP by an amount equal to the greater of: (1) the proceeds from disposition or, (2) the $13,900,000 purchase price compounded monthly based on a 6.43% annual interest rate. The wrap mortgage offset would be calculated at the time of disposition of the San Jose Building.

~~I. Audit Fees~~26

~~The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Asher & Company, Ltd~~VI. ~~for~~Director the audit of NPAMLP’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in NPAMLP’s Form 10-Q, or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for such two fiscal years, amounted to $187,500 ($95,000 and $92,500 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively).Independence

IINPAMLP has no separate nominating, audit or compensation committees because in part, it is not required to do so, but also because no compensation is paid and there are no directors. ~~Audit~~NPAMLP ~~Related~~has ~~Fees~~limited business activities and its day to day activities are run by the Managing General Partner and EBL&S Property Management Inc.

~~None~~Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

~~III~~I. ~~Tax~~Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed infor each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Asher & Company, Ltd. for ~~tax~~the ~~compliance~~audit of NPAMLP’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in NPAMLP’s Form 10-Q, ~~tax~~or ~~advice~~services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the statutory and ~~tax~~regulatory ~~planning~~filings ~~were~~or engagements for such two fiscal years, amounted to $29190,~~000~~500 ($1495,500 ~~for~~and ~~each~~$95,000 offor the years ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~December 31~~2010, ~~2009~~respectively).

IVII. ~~All~~ ~~Other~~Audit Related Fees

~~There were no fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products or services provided by Asher & Company, Ltd~~None. ~~other than the services reported in the two preceding paragraphs.~~

VIII. ~~Pre-approval~~Tax ~~Policies and Procedures~~Fees

~~All~~The ~~audit~~aggregate ~~related~~fees billed ~~services,~~in ~~tax~~each ~~compliance,~~of ~~tax~~the ~~advice~~last ~~and~~two ~~tax~~fiscal ~~planning~~years ~~and~~for ~~other~~professional services ~~were~~rendered ~~pre-approved~~ by ~~the~~Asher ~~Managing~~& ~~General Partner~~Company, which concluded that the provision of such services by NPAMLP’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functionsLtd. ~~The policy of the Managing General Partner provides~~ for ~~pre-approval~~tax ofcompliance, tax ~~these~~advice ~~services~~ and ~~all audit related,~~ tax orplanning ~~other~~were ~~services~~$29,000 ~~not prohibited under Section 10A~~(~~g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~$14,500 ~~as amended, to be performed~~ for ~~NPAMLP~~each ~~by their Independent Registered Public Accountants, subject to the de minimus exception described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B)~~ of the ~~Exchange~~years ~~Act~~ended onDecember ~~an annual basis and on individual engagements if minimum thresholds are exceeded. The percentage of audit related~~31, ~~tax~~2011 and ~~other services that were approved by the Managing General Partner is 100%~~2010).

30IV. All Other Fees

~~PART~~There IVwere no fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products or services provided by Asher & Company, Ltd. other than the services reported in the two preceding paragraphs.

~~Item 15~~V. ~~Exhibits,~~Pre-approval ~~Financial~~Policies and ~~Statement Schedules~~Procedures

IAll audit related services, tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning and other services were pre-approved by the Managing General Partner, which concluded that the provision of such services by NPAMLP’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. ~~Documents~~ ~~filed~~The policy of the Managing General Partner provides for pre-approval of these services and all audit related, tax or other services not prohibited under Section 10A(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as ~~Part~~amended, to be performed for NPAMLP by their Independent Registered Public Accountants, subject to the de minimus exception described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of ~~this~~the ~~Report~~Exchange Act on an annual basis and on individual engagements if minimum thresholds are exceeded. The percentage of audit related, tax and other services that were approved by the Managing General Partner is 100%.

A. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-1
Combined Financial Statements:
Combined Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-3
Combined Statements of Operations and Changes
in Partners' Deficit for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-4
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-5
Notes to Combined Financial Statements			F-6

~~B. Exhibits~~PART IV

Exhibit No.		Description
*2.1		Consolidation Agreement by and among the National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”); EBL&S, Inc. (“EBL&S”) and Buster, Inc. (“Buster”).
*2.2		Settlement Agreement by and among plaintiffs as a class, National Property Analysts, Inc. (“NPA”) and certain additional defendants in James O'Brien, et al. v. National Property Analysts, Inc., et al. (the “Action”).
*2.3		Judgment and Order Approving the Transaction, the Formation of the Master Limited Partnership, and the Allocation of Interests in the Master Limited Partnership entered by the Court.
*3.1		Initial Limited Partnership Agreement of NPAMLP.
*3.2		Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of NPAMLP.
*3.3		Certificate of Limited Partnership of NPAMLP.
****3.4		Amendment One to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of NPAMLP.
*10.1		Restructuring and Mortgage Modification Agreement by and among Main Line Pension Group, L.P. (“MLPG”), NPAMLP and National Property Analysts, Inc.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

31I. Documents filed as Part of this Report

*10.2		Leasing and Management Agreement by and between EBL&S Property Management, Inc. and NPAMLP.
*10.3		Information Statement Relating to the formation of NPAMLP.
*10.4		Proof of Claim and Release and Vote on Consolidation.
**10.6		Line of Credit Promissory Note.
***10.7		Agreement between NPAMLP, NPAEP and PVPG.
***16.1		Letter from replaced accountants (previously filed with Form 8-K dated May 29, 2002).
31.1		Certification of Managing General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Equity General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.3		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Managing General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Equity General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.3		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

* Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10 filed July 14, 1994 (0-24816)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Combined Financial Statements:

Combined Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010	F-2

Combined Statements of Operations and Changes in Partners' Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010	F-3

Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010	F-4

Notes to Combined Financial Statements	F-5

** Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 1996 (0-24816)B. Exhibits

*** Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003 (0-24816).

Exhibit No.		Description

*2.1		Consolidation Agreement by and among the National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (“NPAMLP”); EBL&S, Inc. (“EBL&S”) and Buster, Inc. (“Buster”).

*2.2		Settlement Agreement by and among plaintiffs as a class, National Property Analysts, Inc. (“NPA”) and certain additional defendants in James O'Brien, et al. v. National Property Analysts, Inc., et al. (the “Action”).

*2.3		Judgment and Order Approving the Transaction, the Formation of the Master Limited Partnership, and the Allocation of Interests in the Master Limited Partnership entered by the Court.

*3.1		Initial Limited Partnership Agreement of NPAMLP.

*3.2		Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of NPAMLP.

*3.3		Certificate of Limited Partnership of NPAMLP.

****3.4		Amendment One to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of NPAMLP.

*10.1		Restructuring and Mortgage Modification Agreement by and among Main Line Pension Group, L.P. (“MLPG”), NPAMLP and National Property Analysts, Inc.

**** Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q filed November 11, 2003 (0-24816).28

*10.2		Leasing and Management Agreement by and between EBL&S Property Management, Inc. and NPAMLP.

*10.3		Information Statement Relating to the formation of NPAMLP.

*10.4		Proof of Claim and Release and Vote on Consolidation.
**10.6		Line of Credit Promissory Note.

***10.7		Agreement between NPAMLP, NPAEP and PVPG.

***16.1		Letter from replaced accountants (previously filed with Form 8-K dated May 29, 2002).

31.1		Certification of Managing General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Equity General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Managing General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Equity General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.3		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

*		Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10 filed July 14, 1994 (0-24816)
**		Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed April 1, 1996 (0-24816).
***		Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003 (0-24816).
****		Incorporated by reference from Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q filed November 11, 2003 (0-24816).

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.29

~~NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(~~Registrant~~d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~By: EBL&S,~~NATIONAL ~~Inc.,~~PROPERTY ~~its~~ANALYSTS ~~managing~~MASTER ~~general~~LIMITED ~~partner~~PARTNERSHIP

~~By: /s/ Edward B. Lipkin Edward B. Lipkin Director~~(Registrant)

~~Date~~By: ~~March~~EBL&S, 30Inc., ~~2011~~its managing general partner

By: Feldman International, Inc., its equity general partner

By:		/s/ Edward B. Lipkin
		Edward B. Lipkin
		Director

Date:		March 30, 2012

By: ~~/s/~~Feldman ~~Robert~~International, ~~McKinney~~Inc., ~~Robert~~its ~~McKinney~~equity ~~Director~~general partner

Date: March 30, 2011

By:		/s/ Robert McKinney
		Robert McKinney
		Director

Date:		March 30, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Capacity	Date
/s/ Edward B. Lipkin	Director of EBL&S, Inc.	March 30, ~~2011~~2012
Edward B. Lipkin	Principal Executive Officer,
	Principal Accounting Officer and
	Principal Financial Officer
/s/ Robert McKinney	Director of Feldman International, Inc.	March 30, ~~2011~~2012
Robert McKinney	Registrant’s equity general partner

3330

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS

MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

DECEMBER 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(a limited partnership)

Table of Contents

		Page No.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Combined Balance Sheets December 31, 2010 and 2009		F-3
Combined Balance Sheets December 31, 2011 and 2010		3
Combined Statements of Operations and Changes in Partners’ Deficit,
Combined Statements of Operations and Changes in Partners’ Deficit, Years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010		4
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009		F-4
Combined Statements of Cash Flows, Years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010		5
Combined Statements of Cash Flows,
Notes to Combined Financial Statements		6
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009		F-5
Notes to Combined Financial Statements		F-6

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

General Partners National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership

We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (NPAMLP) (a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related combined statements of operations and changes in Partners’ deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011. The Partnership’s management is responsible for these combined financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits.

We ~~have~~conducted ~~audited~~our ~~the~~audits in ~~accompanying~~accordance ~~combined~~with ~~balance~~the ~~sheets~~standards of ~~National~~the ~~Property~~Public ~~Analysts~~Company ~~Master~~Accounting ~~Limited~~Oversight ~~Partnership~~Board (~~NPAMLP~~United States). (aThose ~~limited~~standards ~~partnership)~~require asthat we ofplan ~~December~~and ~~31,~~perform ~~2010~~the ~~and~~audit ~~2009~~to ~~and~~obtain ~~the~~reasonable ~~related~~assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of ~~operations~~material misstatement. ~~and~~The ~~changes~~Partnership inis ~~Partners’~~not ~~deficit~~required ~~and~~to ~~cash~~have, ~~flows~~nor ~~for~~were ~~each~~we engaged to perform, an audit of ~~the~~its ~~years~~internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the ~~two-year~~circumstances, ~~period~~but ~~ended~~not ~~December~~for ~~31,~~the ~~2010. The~~purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal ~~management~~control isover ~~responsible~~financial ~~for~~reporting. ~~these~~Accordingly, ~~combined~~we ~~financial~~express ~~statements.~~no ~~Our~~such ~~responsibility~~opinion. isAn toaudit ~~express~~also anincludes ~~opinion~~examining, on ~~these~~a ~~combined~~test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial ~~statements~~statement, ~~based~~assessing onthe accounting principles used and significant estimates made by managements, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by managements, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.1

FIn our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the combined results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-1year period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In/s/ ~~our~~ASHER ~~opinion,~~& ~~the combined financial statements referred to above presents fairly~~COMPANY, in all material respects, the combined financial position of National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the combined results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaLtd.

~~/s/~~Philadelphia, ~~ASHER~~Pennsylvania March ~~& COMPANY~~30, ~~Ltd.~~2012

~~Philadelphia, Pennsylvania~~2

~~March~~NATIONAL ~~30,~~PROPERTY ~~2011~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-2~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Combined ~~PROPERTY~~Balance ~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Sheets

(aDecember ~~limited~~31, ~~partnership)~~2011 and 2010

~~Combined~~(in ~~Balance Sheets~~thousands)

December 31, 2010 and 2009

	2011			2010
Assets
Rental property, at cost:
Land	$	7,568		$	7,568
Buildings		107,994			107,418
Tenant-in-common property		22,662			22,662
		138,224			137,648
Less: accumulated depreciation		81,063			78,051
Rental property, net		57,161			59,597

Cash and cash equivalents		897			611
Restricted cash		126			108
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		1,441			3,221
Tenant accounts receivable, net of allowance of $30 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively		85			188
Unbilled rent receivable		1,259			1,261

Accounts receivable and other assets, net ⁽¹⁾		399			404

Total assets	$	61,368		$	65,390

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Wraparound mortgages payable ⁽¹⁾	$	140,491		$	148,730
Less: unamortized discount based on imputed interest rate of 12% ⁽¹⁾		25,794			38,044

Wraparound mortgages payable less unamortized discount ⁽¹⁾		114,697			110,686

Due to NPAEP ⁽¹⁾		3,379			3,335
Other borrowings ⁽¹⁾		194			194
Accounts payable and other liabilities ⁽¹⁾		3,420			3,373
Deferred revenue		195			254
Finance lease obligation		1,750			1,750

Total liabilities		123,635			119,592

Partners' deficit		(62,267	)		(54,202	)

Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$	61,368		$	65,390

(~~in thousands~~1) See Note 3: Related Party Transactions.

	2010			2009
Assets
Rental property, at cost:
Land	$	7,568		$	7,582
Buildings		107,418			107,159
Tenant-in-common property		22,662			22,662
		137,648			137,403
Less: accumulated depreciation		78,051			74,008
Rental property, net		59,597			63,395
Cash and cash equivalents		611			787
Restricted cash		108			80
Investment securities available for sale, at market		3,221			3,218
Tenant accounts receivable, net of allowance of $30 as of December 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively		188			148
Unbilled rent receivable		1,261			1,215
Accounts receivable and other assets, net (1)		404			781
Total assets	$	65,390		$	69,624
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Wraparound mortgages payable (1)	$	148,730		$	156,700
Less: unamortized discount based on imputed interest rate of 12% (1)		38,044			49,298
Wraparound mortgages payable less unamortized discount (1)		110,686			107,402
Due to Pension Groups (1)		3,335			3,292
Other borrowings (1)		194			194
Accounts payable and other liabilities (1)		3,373			3,183
Deferred revenue		254			197
Finance lease obligation		1,750			1,750
Total liabilities		119,592			116,018
Partners' deficit		(54,202	)		(46,394	)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$	65,390		$	69,624

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.

~~(1) See Note~~ 3~~: Related Party Transactions.~~

~~See~~NATIONAL ~~accompanying~~PROPERTY ~~notes~~ANALYSTS toMASTER ~~combined financial statements.~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-3~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Combined ~~PROPERTY~~Statements ~~ANALYSTS~~of ~~MASTER~~Operations ~~LIMITED~~and Changes ~~PARTNERSHIP~~in Partners' Deficit

(aYears ~~limited~~Ended ~~partnership)~~December 31, 2011 and 2010

~~Combined~~(in ~~Statements~~thousands, ofexcept ~~Operations~~per-unit ~~and Changes in Partners' Deficit~~data)

Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

	2011			2010
Income:
Rental income	$	12,483		$	12,767
Other charges to tenants		2,975			3,067
Interest and dividend income		79			151
Total income		15,537			15,985

Operating expenses:
Interest expense ⁽¹⁾		13,926			13,099
Real estate taxes		2,779			2,717
Management fees ⁽¹⁾		534			563
Common area maintenance expenses		1,469			1,687
Ground rent ⁽¹⁾		805			781
Repairs and maintenance		433			502
General and administrative ⁽¹⁾		523			732
Depreciation		3,012			4,044
Amortization		33			74
Total operating expenses		23,514			24,199
Operating loss		(7,977	)		(8,214	)

Other income:
Realized gain on investment securities		26			88
Gain from litigation settlement, net		-			225
Loss from continuing operations		(7,951	)		(7,901	)

Discontinued operations:
Gain on disposition of properties, net		-			54
Net loss		(7,951	)		(7,847	)

Partners' deficit:
Beginning of period		(54,202	)		(46,394	)
Other comprehensive income: net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities		(114	)		39

End of period	$	(62,267	)	$	(54,202	)

Net loss per unit	$	(81.34	)	$	(80.27	)
Weighted average units outstanding		97,752			97,752

(in1) ~~thousands,~~See ~~except~~Note ~~per-unit~~3: ~~data)~~Related Party Transactions

	2010			2009
Income:
Rental income	$	12,767		$	13,042
Other charges to tenants		3,067			3,242
Interest and dividend income		151			236
Total income		15,985			16,520
Operating expenses:
Interest expense (1)		13,099			12,313
Real estate taxes		2,717			3,016
Management fees (1)		563			572
Common area maintenance expenses		1,687			1,586
Ground rent (1)		781			776
Repairs and maintenance		502			378
General and administrative (1)		732			535
Depreciation		4,044			4,030
Amortization		74			74
Total operating expenses		24,199			23,280
Operating loss		(8,214	)		(6,760	)
Other income:
Realized gain on investment securities		88			358
Gain from litigation settlement		225			-
Loss from continuing operations		(7,901	)		(6,402	)
Discontinued operations:
Gain on disposition of properties, net		54			-
Net loss		(7,847	)		(6,402	)
Partners' deficit:
Beginning of period		(46,394	)		(40,059	)
Net change in unrealized gain on investment securities		39			67
End of period	$	(54,202	)	$	(46,394	)
Net loss per unit	$	(80.27	)	$	(65.49	)
Weighted average units outstanding		97,752			97,752

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.

~~(1) See Note 3: Related Party Transactions~~4

~~See~~NATIONAL ~~accompanying~~PROPERTY ~~notes~~ANALYSTS toMASTER ~~combined financial statements.~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-4~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Combined ~~PROPERTY~~Statements ~~ANALYSTS~~of ~~MASTER~~Cash ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Flows

(aYears ~~limited~~Ended ~~partnership)~~December 31, 2011 and 2010

~~Combined~~(in ~~Statements~~thousands, ofexcept ~~Cash~~per-unit ~~Flows~~data)

Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(7,951	)	$	(7,847	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		3,045			4,118
Amortization of discount ⁽¹⁾		12,250			11,254
Provision for bad debt		190			240
Net gain on disposition of properties		-			(54	)
Realized gains on investment securities		(26	)		(88	)
Change in assets and liabilities
Decrease (increase) in tenant accounts receivable		103			(40	)
(Increase) decrease in unbilled rent receivable		2			(46	)
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable and other assets ⁽¹⁾		(218	)		63
Increase in accounts payable and other liabilities ⁽¹⁾		47			190
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue		(59	)		57
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,383			7,847

Cash flows from investing activities:
Disposition of properties		-			68
Improvements to rental property		(576	)		(259	)
Increase in restricted cash		(18	)		(28	)
Purchases of investment securities		(4,833	)		(4,439	)
Sale of investment securities		6,525			4,562
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities		1,098			(96	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on wraparound mortgages ⁽¹⁾		(8,239	)		(7,970	)
Increase in balance due to NPAEP		44			43
Net cash used in financing activities		(8,195	)		(7,927	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		286			(176	)

Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period		611			787

End of period	$	897		$	611

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1,251		$	1,489

(in1) ~~thousands,~~See ~~except~~Note ~~per-unit~~3: ~~data)~~Related Party Transactions.

	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(7,847	)	$	(6,402	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		4,118			4,104
Amortization of discount (1)		11,254			10,263
Provision for bad debt		240			-
Net gain on disposition of properties		(54	)		-
Realized gains on investment securities		(88	)		(358	)
Change in assets and liabilities
Increase in tenant accounts receivable		(40	)		(93	)
Increase in unbilled rent receivable		(46	)		(100	)
Decrease in accounts receivable and other assets (1)		63			69
Increase in accounts payable and other liabilities (1)		190			162
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue		57			(16	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,847			7,629
Cash flows from investing activities:
Disposition of properties		68			-
Improvements to rental property		(259	)		(93	)
Increase in restricted cash		(28	)		(17	)
Purchases of investment securities		(4,439	)		(4,753	)
Sale of investment securities		4,562			4,743
Net cash used in investing activities		(96	)		(120	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on wraparound mortgages (1)		(7,970	)		(8,083	)
Increase in balance due to NPAEP		43			44
Net cash used in financing activities		(7,927	)		(7,994	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(176	)		(485	)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period		787			1,272
End of period	$	611		$	787
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1,489		$	1,763

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.

~~(1) See Note 3: Related Party Transactions.~~5

~~See~~NATIONAL ~~accompanying~~PROPERTY ~~notes~~ANALYSTS toMASTER ~~combined financial statements.~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-5~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Notes ~~PROPERTY~~to ~~ANALYSTS~~Combined ~~MASTER~~Financial ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Statements

(aDecember ~~limited~~31, ~~partnership)~~2011 and 2010

~~Notes~~(dollars toin ~~Combined Financial Statements~~thousands)

~~December~~(1) ~~31,~~Formation ~~2010~~ and ~~2009~~Description of Business

National Property Analysts Master Limited Partnership (~~dollars~~NPAMLP), ina ~~thousands~~limited partnership, was formed effective January 1, 1990. NPAMLP is owned 99% by the limited partners and 1% collectively by EBL&S, Inc., the managing general partner, and Feldman International, Inc. (FII), the equity general partner.

The properties included in NPAMLP consist primarily of shopping centers and freestanding, single-tenant retail stores with national retailers as prime tenants. The ownership and operations of these properties have been combined in NPAMLP pursuant to a consolidation of properties owned by certain limited partnerships previously sponsored by National Property Analysts, Inc. and its affiliates (1NPA) ~~Formation~~. NPAMLP intends to hold the properties until such time as it is deemed prudent to dispose of them. The precise timing of disposition of the properties is at the discretion of the managing general partner. However, in accordance with the partnership agreement, the partnership will terminate on December 31, 2013. As such the NPAMLP has provided detail disclosure of commitments through its termination date and summary ~~Description~~disclosure of ~~Business~~commitments after the termination date of NPAMLP.

~~National~~The ~~Property~~properties ~~Analysts~~of ~~Master~~NPAMLP ~~Limited~~are owned ~~Partnership~~by ~~(NPAMLP),~~eighteen aseparate ~~limited~~partnerships ~~partnership,~~and ~~was~~limited ~~formed~~liability ~~effective~~companies. ~~January~~Each 1,partnership ~~1990. NPAMLP~~or islimited ~~owned~~liability ~~99%~~company byis ~~the~~a ~~limited~~legally distinct ~~partners~~entity and 1%there ~~collectively~~are byno ~~EBL&S,~~transactions ~~Inc.,~~between the ~~managing~~various ~~general~~entities. ~~partner,~~Since ~~and~~each ~~Feldman~~entity ~~International,~~is ~~Inc.~~under ~~(FII)~~common control, the ~~equity~~financial statements ~~general~~are ~~partner~~presented on a combined basis.

The ~~properties~~partnership ~~included~~agreement inprovides for ~~NPAMLP~~a ~~consist~~sharing ~~primarily~~ of ~~shopping~~cash ~~centers~~from ~~and~~the ~~freestanding,~~proceeds ~~single-tenant~~of ~~retail~~sales ~~stores~~of ~~with~~properties. ~~national~~The ~~retailers~~partnership asagreement ~~prime~~generally ~~tenants. The~~provides ~~ownership~~that ~~and~~the ~~operations~~limited partners of ~~these properties have been combined in~~ NPAMLP ~~pursuant~~receive to40% ~~a consolidation~~ of ~~properties~~the ~~owned~~net byproceeds, ~~certain~~if ~~limited partnerships previously sponsored by National Property Analysts~~any, ~~Inc.~~from ~~and its affiliates (NPA). NPAMLP intends to hold~~ the ~~properties~~sale ~~until such time as it is deemed prudent to dispose~~ of ~~them. The~~properties ~~precise~~after ~~timing~~repayment of ~~disposition of~~ the ~~properties~~third-party isunderlying atmortgage obligations ~~the~~once ~~discretion of~~ the ~~managing~~net ~~general partner. However~~proceeds, inas ~~accordance~~defined ~~with~~in the partnership agreement, ~~the~~from ~~partnership will terminate on December 31, 2013. As such~~ the ~~NPAMLP~~sale ~~has provided detail disclosure~~ of ~~committments~~properties ~~through~~exceed ~~its~~a ~~termination~~threshold ~~date and summary disclosure~~ amount of ~~commitments~~$45,000 ~~after~~ (the ~~termination date of NPAMLP~~Threshold).

~~The~~Through ~~properties~~December of31, 2011, NPAMLP sold ~~are~~properties ~~owned~~that bygenerated ~~eighteen~~approximately ~~separate~~$36,602 ~~partnerships~~in ~~and~~net ~~limited~~proceeds ~~liability~~that ~~companies.~~have ~~Each~~been ~~partnership~~applied oras ~~limited liability company is~~ a ~~legally~~reduction ~~distinct~~of ~~entity and there are no transactions between~~ the ~~various~~Threshold ~~entities~~amount. ~~Since~~ NPAMLP ~~each~~has ~~entity~~not isdistributed ~~under~~any ~~common~~sales ~~control,~~proceeds ~~the~~to ~~financial~~its ~~statements~~partners ~~are~~since ~~presented~~its ~~on a combined basis~~organization.

~~The~~Additionally, ~~partnership~~the ~~agreement~~limited ~~provides~~partners of ~~for~~NPAMLP areceive ~~sharing~~40% of the cash ~~from~~flow, ~~the~~if ~~proceeds~~any, offrom ~~sales~~operations ofin ~~properties. The~~excess ~~partnership~~of ~~agreement~~debt ~~generally~~service ~~provides~~requirements ~~that~~and ~~the~~any ~~limited~~capital ~~partners~~improvements or ofreserves ~~NPAMLP~~considered ~~receive~~necessary. ~~40%~~The ofremaining ~~the~~cash ~~net proceeds~~flow, if any, ~~from~~is ~~the~~applied ~~sale~~to ofthe ~~properties~~wraparound ~~after~~mortgages ~~repayment~~in payment of ~~the~~accrued interest ~~third-party~~and ~~underlying~~then ~~mortgage~~principal. ~~obligations~~It ~~once~~is ~~the~~not ~~net~~anticipated ~~proceeds,~~that asNPAMLP ~~defined~~will be in ~~the~~a ~~partnership~~position ~~agreement,~~to ~~from~~distribute ~~the~~cash ~~sale~~flow ofto ~~properties~~its ~~exceed~~partners ~~a threshold amount of $45,000 (~~in the ~~Threshold)~~foreseeable future.

~~Through~~Under ~~December~~the ~~31,~~terms ~~2010,~~of the NPAMLP partnership ~~sold properties that generated approximately $36~~agreement,~~602~~ inthe ~~net~~limited ~~proceeds~~partners ~~that~~are ~~have~~entitled ~~been~~to ~~applied as~~ a ~~reduction~~99% share of ~~the~~any ~~Threshold~~income ~~amount. NPAMLP~~or ~~has~~loss ~~not~~and ~~distributed~~the ~~any~~equity ~~sales~~general ~~proceeds~~partner is entitled to ~~its~~a ~~partners~~1% ~~since its organization~~share.

Additionally, the limited partners of NPAMLP receive 40% of the cash flow, if any, from operations in excess of debt service requirements and any capital improvements or reserves considered necessary. The remaining cash flow, if any, is applied to the wraparound mortgages in payment of accrued interest and then principal. It is not anticipated that NPAMLP will be in a position to distribute cash flow to its partners in the foreseeable future.Liquidity

~~Under~~NPAMLP ~~the~~has ~~terms~~working capital as of ~~the~~December ~~NPAMLP~~31, ~~partnership~~2011 ~~agreement~~and 2010, ~~the~~of ~~limited~~approximately ~~partners~~$1,432 ~~are~~and ~~entitled~~$2,964, respectively, excluding amounts due to aEBL&S ~~99%~~of ~~share~~$2,729 and $2,608, respectively, and excluding amounts due to NPAEP of ~~any~~$3,379 ~~income~~and or$3,335 ~~loss~~at December 31, 2011 and ~~the~~2010, ~~equity~~respectively. ~~general~~NPAMLP has ~~partner~~$897 isof ~~entitled~~unrestricted cash and $2,306 available under line of credit agreements at December 31, 2011, to ameet 1%its ~~share~~short-term obligations. Through December 31, 2011, NPAMLP has replenished its working capital reserves through the sale of properties on which the holders of the second mortgage and the wraparound mortgage have released their liens.

~~Liquidity~~6

~~NPAMLP~~NATIONAL ~~has~~PROPERTY ~~working~~ANALYSTS ~~capital~~MASTER as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, of approximately $2,964 and $3,156, respectively, excluding amounts due to EBL&S of $2,608 and $2,448, respectively, and excluding amounts due to NPAEP of $3,335 and $3,292 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. NPAMLP has $611 of unrestricted cash and $2,306 available under line of credit agreements at December 31, 2010, to meet its short-term obligations. Through December 31, 2010, NPAMLP has replenished its working capital reserves through the sale of properties on which the holders of the second mortgage and the wraparound mortgage have released their liens.LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-6~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Notes ~~PROPERTY~~to ~~ANALYSTS~~Combined ~~MASTER~~Financial ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Statements

(aDecember ~~limited~~31, ~~partnership)~~2011 and 2010

~~Notes~~(dollars toin ~~Combined Financial Statements~~thousands)

~~December~~(2) ~~31,~~Summary ~~2010~~of ~~and~~Significant ~~2009~~Accounting Policies

(~~dollars~~a) inRental ~~thousands)~~Property

~~(2) Summary~~Rental properties are stated at original cost. Depreciation on buildings and building improvements is calculated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of ~~Significant~~30 ~~Accounting~~years ~~Policies~~and 15 to 39 years, respectively.

NPAMLP accounts for the property owned as tenants-in-common (a“TIC”) ~~Rental~~ ~~Property~~with unaffiliated third parties using the proportionate consolidation method, in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance. NPAMLP owns an undivided interest in the San Jose property through its 23.9% ownership of 2525 North First Street Holdings, a Delaware Statutory Trust, and does not control the decisions over the property or the other tenant-in-common interests. The financial statements reflect only NPAMLP’s percentage of the TIC’s real property, related mortgage, revenues and expenses. The anchor tenant at this property is Sun Microsystems who has a lease with 2525 North First Street Holdings. NPAMLP’s proportionate share at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

Rental properties are stated at original cost. Depreciation on buildings and building improvements is calculated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 30 years and 15 to 39 years, respectively.

	2011		2010
Tenant-in-common property	$	22,662	$	22,662
Wraparound mortgage payable, net of discount		10,557		12,262

~~NPAMLP~~In ~~accounts~~accordance ~~for~~with ~~the~~FASB ~~property~~authoritative guidance, ~~owned~~rental asproperties ~~tenants-in-common~~are ~~(“TIC”)~~reviewed ~~with~~by ~~unaffiliated~~management ~~third~~for ~~parties~~impairment ~~using~~whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the ~~proportionate~~carrying ~~consolidation~~amount ~~method,~~of inan ~~accordance~~asset ~~with~~may ~~FASB~~not ~~authoritative~~be ~~guidance~~recoverable. ~~NPAMLP~~ Recoverability ~~owns~~of anrental ~~undivided~~properties ~~interest~~is inmeasured by comparison of the ~~San~~carrying ~~Jose~~amount ~~property~~of ~~through~~the ~~its~~properties ~~23.9%~~to ~~ownership~~undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the properties. The determination of ~~2525~~future ~~North~~undiscounted ~~First~~cash ~~Street~~flows ~~Holdings,~~requires asignificant ~~Delaware~~estimates ~~Statutory~~by ~~Trust~~management, ~~and~~including ~~does~~the ~~not~~expected ~~control~~course of action at the ~~decisions~~balance ~~over~~sheet ~~the~~date ~~property~~that orwould ~~the~~lead ~~other~~to ~~tenant-in-common~~such ~~interests~~cash flows. ~~The~~Subsequent ~~financial~~changes ~~statements~~in ~~reflect~~estimated ~~only~~undiscounted ~~NPAMLP’s~~cash ~~percentage~~flows arising from changes in anticipated action to be taken with respect to the property could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the ~~TIC~~effects could materially impact NPAMLP’s ~~real~~net income. If any property, ~~related~~is ~~mortgage~~considered to be impaired, the ~~revenues~~impairment ~~and~~to ~~expenses~~be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds its fair value. ~~NPAMLP’s~~ Management ~~proportionate~~determines ~~share~~fair atvalue ~~December~~by ~~31,~~utilizing ~~2010~~market ~~was~~and asincome ~~follows:~~approaches.

	2010		2009
Tenant-in-common property	$	22,662	$	22,662
Wraparound mortgage payable, net of discount		12,262		13,689

The market approach estimates what a potential buyer would pay today. The key inputs used in the model include, broker quotes, capitalization rates, expected lease up and holding periods or property appraisals. When available, current market information, like comparative sales price, are used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. NPAMLP also utilizes the income approach to estimate the fair value of our income producing real estate assets. To the extent that the assumptions used in testing long-lived assets for impairment differ from those of a marketplace participant, the assumptions are modified in order to estimate the fair value of a real estate asset when an impairment charge is measured. In addition to determining future cash flows, which make the estimation of a real estate asset’s undiscounted cash flows highly subjective, the selection of the discount rate and exit capitalization rate used in applying the income approach is also highly subjective. There were no impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

InGains ~~accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, rental properties are reviewed by management for impairment whenever events~~ or ~~changes~~losses in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of rental properties is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the properties to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the properties. The determination of future undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by management, including the expected course of action at the balance sheet date that would lead to such cash flows. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from ~~changes in anticipated action to be taken with respect to~~ the ~~property could impact the determination~~ sales of ~~whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could materially impact NPAMLP’s net income. If any~~ property isgenerally ~~considered~~are ~~to be impaired, the impairment to be~~ recognized isusing ~~measured by~~ the ~~amount~~full byaccrual ~~which~~method ~~the~~in ~~carrying~~accordance ~~amount~~with of the ~~property~~FASB ~~exceeds~~authoritative ~~its fair value~~guidance. ~~Management determines fair value by utilizing market and income approaches.~~

The market approach estimates what a potential buyer would pay today. The key inputs used in the model included, broker quotes, capitalization rates, expected lease up and holding periods or property appraisals. When available, current market information, like comparative sales price, was used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. NPAMLP also utilizes the income approach to estimate the fair value of our income producing real estate assets. To the extent that the assumptions used in testing long-lived assets for impairment differ from those of a marketplace participant, the assumptions are modified in order to estimate the fair value of a real estate asset when an impairment charge is measured. In addition to determining future cash flows, which make the estimation of a real estate asset’s undiscounted cash flows highly subjective, the selection of the discount rate and exit capitalization rate used in applying the income approach is also highly subjective. There were no impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.7

~~Gains~~NATIONAL orPROPERTY ~~losses~~ANALYSTS ~~from~~MASTER ~~the sales of property generally are recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance.~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-7~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Notes ~~PROPERTY~~to ~~ANALYSTS~~Combined ~~MASTER~~Financial ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Statements

(aDecember ~~limited~~31, ~~partnership)~~2011 and 2010

~~Notes~~(dollars toin ~~Combined Financial Statements~~thousands)

~~December~~(b) ~~31,~~Cash ~~2010~~ and ~~2009~~Cash Equivalents

~~(dollars~~All highly liquid interest-bearing deposits with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were held in ~~thousands)~~the custody of multiple financial institutions. The balances, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. NPAMLP mitigates this risk by depositing funds with major financial institutions. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, cash was held in multiple accounts maintained at four separate financial institutions. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the total cash balance held at these institutions was approximately $1,145 and $882, respectively. The balances exceeded federally insured limits by $361 and $531 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(bc) ~~Cash~~Restricted ~~and~~ Cash ~~Equivalents~~

~~All~~Restricted ~~highly~~cash ~~liquid~~consists ~~interest-bearing deposits with original maturities~~ principally of ~~three~~amounts ~~months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were~~ held in ~~the~~escrow ~~custody of multiple financial institutions. The balances, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. NPAMLP mitigates this risk~~ by ~~depositing~~lending ~~funds with major financial~~ institutions. Atfor ~~December~~real ~~31,~~estate ~~2010 and 2009, cash was held in multiple accounts maintained at three separate financial institutions~~taxes. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the total cash balance held at these institutions was approximately $882 and $1,119, respectively. The balances exceeded federally insured limits by $531 and $756 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(cd) ~~Restricted~~Tenant ~~Cash~~Accounts Receivable

~~Restricted~~Accounts ~~cash~~receivable ~~consists~~include ~~principally~~current tenant accounts receivable, net of ~~amounts~~allowances, ~~held~~and inother ~~escrow~~accruals. byNPAMLP ~~lending~~regularly ~~institutions~~reviews the collectability of its receivables and the credit worthiness of its tenants and adjusts its allowance for ~~real~~doubtful ~~estate~~accounts, ~~taxes~~unbilled rent receivable balance and tenant improvement and leasing costs amortization accordingly.

(de) ~~Tenant~~ Accounts Receivable and Other Assets

Accounts receivable ~~include~~and ~~current~~other assets ~~tenant~~includes ~~accounts~~a past due note receivable, ~~net~~from the buyer of ~~allowances~~the Ardmore, ~~and~~Oklahoma ~~other~~property ~~accruals.~~ for which NPAMLP ~~regularly~~recorded ~~reviews~~an allowance for doubtful accounts in the ~~collectability~~amount of ~~its~~$430 ~~receivables~~and $240 at December 31, 2011 and ~~the~~2010, ~~credit~~respectively ~~worthiness~~(see ofNote ~~its~~16). ~~tenants~~Accounts receivable and ~~adjusts~~other ~~its~~assets ~~allowance~~also ~~for~~include ~~doubtful~~certain ~~accounts,~~prepaid ~~straight-line rent~~expenses ~~receivable~~and ~~balance~~leasing commissions which have been capitalized and ~~tenant~~amortized ~~improvement~~over the lives of the respective leases. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the amount of deferred leasing ~~costs~~commissions was $368 and $346, respectively, and the amount of accumulated amortization ~~accordingly~~was $320 and $291, respectively.

(ef) ~~Accounts~~Investment ~~Receivable and Other Assets~~Securities

~~Accounts~~Investment ~~receivable~~securities, ~~and~~consisting of ~~other~~mutual ~~assets~~funds ~~includes~~and acommon ~~past due note receivable from the buyer of the Ardmore~~stock, ~~Oklahoma~~are ~~property~~classified ~~for~~as ~~which~~available ~~NPAMLP has recognized a provision~~ for ~~bad~~sale ~~debt~~and incarried ~~the amount of $240~~ at ~~December~~estimated ~~31,~~fair ~~2010~~value. ~~Accounts~~Realized ~~receivable~~gains and losses ~~other~~on ~~assets~~the ~~also~~sale ~~includes~~of ~~certain~~investment ~~prepaid~~securities ~~expenses~~are ~~and~~recorded ~~leasing~~on ~~commissions~~the ~~which~~trade ~~have~~date ~~been capitalized~~ and ~~amortized~~ ~~over~~are ~~the~~determined ~~lives~~using of the ~~respective~~specific ~~leases~~identification method. AtUnrealized ~~December~~gains ~~31, 2010~~ and ~~2009,~~losses on the ~~amount~~investment ofsecurities ~~deferred~~are ~~leasing~~recognized ~~commissions~~as ~~was~~an ~~$346,~~adjustment ~~and the amount~~ of accumulated ~~amortization~~other ~~was~~comprehensive income ~~$291~~(loss) ~~and~~within ~~$221,~~partners’ ~~respectively~~capital.

(fg) ~~Investment~~Discount ~~Securities~~on Wraparound Mortgage

~~Investment~~The ~~securities,~~discount ~~consisting~~on ofwraparound ~~mutual~~mortgages represents ~~funds~~the ~~and~~difference ~~common~~between ~~stock,~~the ~~are~~present ~~classified~~value asof ~~available~~mortgage ~~for~~payments ~~sale~~at ~~and~~the ~~carried~~stated atinterest ~~estimated~~rate ~~fair~~(see ~~value. Realized~~Note ~~gains~~9) and ~~losses~~the imputed rate of 12%. NPAMLP adjusts the discount on wraparound mortgages for changes in the ~~sale~~projected ofcash ~~investment~~flows. ~~securities~~The ~~are~~resultant increase or decrease in the discount is recorded onas interest expense in the ~~trade~~year ~~date~~of ~~and~~the ~~are~~adjustment. ~~determined~~The discount is amortized using the effective ~~specific~~interest ~~identification~~ method. ~~Unrealized~~over ~~gains~~the terms of the mortgages and ~~losses~~is onrecorded as interest expense. In accordance with the ~~investment~~FASB ~~securities~~authoritative guidance, ~~are~~NPAMLP ~~included~~accounts for the unamortized discount on wraparound mortgages related to wraparound mortgages that have been extinguished as alosses ~~separate~~or ~~component~~gains ofin ~~Partners’~~the ~~deficit~~period of extinguishment.

~~(g) Discount on Wraparound Mortgage~~8

~~The~~NATIONAL ~~discount~~PROPERTY onANALYSTS ~~wraparound~~MASTER mortgages represents the difference between the present value of mortgage payments at the stated interest rate (see Note 9) and the imputed rate of 12%. NPAMLP adjusts the discount on wraparound mortgages for changes in the projected cash flows. The resultant increase or decrease in the discount is recorded as interest expense in the year of the adjustment. The discount is amortized using the interest method over the terms of the mortgages and is recorded as interest expense. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, NPAMLP accounts for the unamortized discount on wraparound mortgages related to wraparound mortgages that have been extinguished as losses or gains in the period of extinguishment.LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-8~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Notes ~~PROPERTY~~to ~~ANALYSTS~~Combined ~~MASTER~~Financial ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Statements

(aDecember ~~limited~~31, ~~partnership)~~2011 and 2010

~~Notes~~(dollars toin ~~Combined Financial Statements~~thousands)

~~December~~(h) ~~31,~~Rental ~~2010 and 2009~~Income

~~(dollars~~Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Unbilled rent receivable represents the amount by which the straight-line rentals exceed the current rent collectible under the payment terms of the lease agreements. Rental income represents minimum rental income collectible under the payment terms of the lease agreements. Percentage rent represents rental income that the tenant pays based on a percentage of its sales, either as a percentage of total sales or as a percentage of sales in ~~thousands)~~excess of a threshold amount. Percentage rent and tenant pass-through charges including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and property insurance are recognized in income when earned and are recorded as other charges to tenants

(hi) ~~Rental~~ Income Taxes

~~Rental~~No ~~income~~provision ishas ~~recognized~~been onmade ~~a straight-line basis over~~ in the ~~terms~~combined offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~respective~~for ~~leases. Unbilled~~income ~~rent~~taxes, ~~receivable~~as ~~represents~~any ~~the~~such ~~amount~~liability byis ~~which~~ the ~~straight-line~~liability ~~rentals exceed the current rent collectible under the payment terms~~ of the ~~lease~~individual ~~agreements~~partners. ~~Percentage~~ ~~rent~~NPAMLP adopted ~~represents rental income collectible under~~ the ~~payment~~provisions ~~terms~~ of ~~the~~accounting ~~lease~~standards ~~agreements. Percentage~~for ~~rent~~income ~~represents~~taxes ~~rental~~which ~~income~~changed ~~that~~ the ~~tenant~~framework ~~pays~~for ~~based~~accounting onfor auncertainty ~~percentage~~in ~~of its sales~~income taxes. Accordingly, ~~either~~there asare ano ~~percentage~~uncertain oftax ~~total~~positions ~~sales~~ or aspossibly asignificant ~~percentage~~unrecognized tax ofbenefits ~~sales~~that ~~in excess of a threshold amount. Percentage rent and tenant pass-through charges including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and property insurance~~ are ~~recognized~~reasonably inexpected ~~income~~to ~~when~~occur ~~earned~~within ~~and~~the ~~are~~next ~~recorded as Other charges to tenants~~12 months.

(ij) ~~Income~~Fair ~~Taxes~~Value of Financial Instruments

NoThe ~~provision~~FASB’s ~~has~~authoritative guidance ~~been~~requires ~~made~~disclosure inof the ~~combined~~fair value of certain financial ~~statements~~instruments. ~~for~~Cash, ~~income~~investment ~~taxes~~securities, astenant ~~any~~accounts ~~such~~receivable, accounts ~~liability~~payable isand ~~the~~other ~~liability~~liabilities ofas reflected in the ~~individual~~combined ~~partners.~~financial ~~NPAMLP~~statements ~~adopted~~approximate fair value because of the short-term ~~provisions~~maturity of ~~accounting~~these ~~standards~~instruments. ~~for~~In ~~income~~accordance ~~taxes~~with ~~which~~this ~~changed~~guidance, ~~the~~NPAMLP ~~framework~~has ~~for~~determined ~~accounting~~the ~~for~~estimated ~~uncertainty~~fair invalue ~~income~~of ~~taxes. Accordingly,~~its wraparound ~~there~~mortgages ~~are~~based noon ~~uncertain~~discounted ~~tax~~future ~~positions~~cash orflows ~~possibly~~at ~~significant~~a ~~unrecognized~~current ~~tax~~market ~~benefits~~rate. Management estimates that ~~are~~the ~~reasonably~~carrying ~~expected~~value approximates tothe ~~occur~~estimated ~~within~~fair value of the ~~next~~wraparound ~~12 months~~mortgages at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

(jk) ~~Fair~~Discontinued ~~Value of Financial Instruments~~Operations

~~The~~Income ~~FASB’s~~or ~~authoritative~~loss ~~guidance~~from ~~requires disclosure~~ operations of ~~the~~sold ~~fair~~properties ~~value~~is ofreported ~~certain financial instruments. Cash, investment securities, tenant accounts receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities~~ as ~~reflected~~discontinued operations in ~~the combined financial statements approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. In~~ accordance with ~~this guidance, NPAMLP has determined~~ the ~~estimated~~FASB ~~fair~~authoritative ~~value of its wraparound mortgages based on discounted future cash flows at a current market rate~~guidance. ~~Management estimates that the carrying value approximates the estimated fair value of the wraparound mortgages at December 31, 2010 and 2009.~~

(kl) ~~Discontinued~~Use ~~Operations~~of Estimates

~~Income~~The orpreparation ~~loss~~of ~~from~~financial statements ~~operations~~in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of ~~sold~~America ~~properties~~requires ismanagement to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported asamounts ~~discontinued~~of ~~operations~~assets inand ~~accordance~~liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates have been made by management with respect to the ~~FASB~~recoverability ~~authoritative~~of ~~guidance~~the carrying amounts of rental property. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

(lm) ~~Use~~Recent ofAccounting ~~Estimates~~Pronouncements

~~The~~In ~~preparation~~January of2011, ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~FASB inissued ASU ~~conformity~~No. ~~with~~2011-01 ~~accounting~~("ASC ~~principles~~Update ~~generally~~2011-01"), ~~accepted~~Deferral inof the ~~United~~Effective ~~States~~Date of ~~America~~Disclosures ~~requires~~about ~~management~~Troubled toDebt ~~make~~Restructurings in ~~estimates~~Update ~~and~~No. ~~assumptions~~2010-20. ~~that~~This ~~affect~~ASU temporarily delays the ~~reported~~effective ~~amounts~~date for public entities of ~~assets~~the ~~and~~disclosures ~~liabilities~~about ~~and~~troubled ~~disclosure~~debt restructurings of(TDRs) ~~contingent~~in ~~assets~~ASU ~~and~~No. ~~liabilities~~2010-20, atDisclosures about the ~~date~~Credit Quality of ~~the~~Financing ~~financial~~Receivables ~~statements~~ and the ~~reported~~Allowance ~~amounts~~for ofCredit Losses. ~~revenues~~ASU ~~and~~No. ~~expenses~~2011-01 ~~during~~is ~~the~~effective ~~reporting~~for ~~period. Significant~~interim ~~estimates~~and ~~have~~annual ~~been~~periods ~~made~~ending byafter ~~management~~June ~~with~~15, ~~respect~~2011. toNPAMLP ~~the~~has ~~recoverability~~adopted the provisions of ~~the~~this ~~carrying~~ASU ~~amounts~~and ofit ~~rental~~did ~~property. Actual~~not ~~results~~have ~~could~~a ~~differ~~material ~~from~~impact ~~these~~on ~~estimates~~its combined condensed financial statements.

~~(m) Reclassifications~~9

ItNATIONAL isPROPERTY ~~policy~~ANALYSTS ofMASTER NPAMLP to reclassify prior year financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance. Such reclassifications have no effect on Net income or loss in the Combined Statements of Operations and Changes in Partners’ Deficit.LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~F-9~~(a limited partnership)

~~NATIONAL~~Notes ~~PROPERTY~~to ~~ANALYSTS~~Combined ~~MASTER~~Financial ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Statements

(aDecember ~~limited~~31, ~~partnership)~~2011 and 2010

~~Notes~~(dollars toin ~~Combined Financial Statements~~thousands)

~~December~~In 31May 2011, ~~2010~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update (" ASU") 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and ~~2009~~Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (" ASU 2011-04"). The amendments in ASU 2011-04 change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. NPAMLP does not anticipate a material impact to its financial position, results of operations or cash flows as a result of this change.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 (~~dollars~~“ASC inUpdate ~~thousands~~2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable user of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements.

(n3) ~~New~~Related-Party ~~pronouncements~~Transactions

InNPAMLP ~~January~~is ~~2010,~~owned ~~the~~99% ~~FASB~~by ~~issued~~the ~~authoritative~~limited partners ~~guidance~~and to1% ~~enhance~~collectively ~~the~~by ~~usefulness~~EBL&S, ~~of fair value measurements~~Inc., ~~This guidance amends~~ the ~~disclosures~~managing ~~about~~general ~~fair~~partner ~~value~~and ~~measurements~~FII, in the ~~FASB~~equity ~~Accounting~~general ~~Standards Codification~~partner. ~~The~~EBL&S, ~~amended~~Inc. assigned ~~guidance~~its iseconomic ~~effective~~interest ~~for~~as ~~interim~~general ~~and~~partner ~~annual~~to ~~reporting periods beginning after December 15~~FII, ~~2009,~~and ~~except~~FII ~~for~~was ~~the~~admitted ~~disaggregation~~as ~~requirement for~~ the ~~reconciliation~~equity ~~disclosure~~general ofpartner ~~Level~~on 3September ~~measurements~~30, ~~which~~1998. EBL&S, Inc. is ~~effective~~owned ~~for~~by ~~fiscal~~E&H ~~years~~Properties, ~~beginning~~Inc. ~~after~~(E&H), ~~December~~a ~~15,~~corporation ~~2010~~owned and ~~for~~controlled ~~interim~~by ~~periods~~Edward ~~within those years~~B. ~~NPAMLP~~Lipkin ~~has adopted the provisions of the guidance which did not have~~ (Lipkin), a ~~material~~related ~~impact on its combined financial statements~~party.

InAt ~~June 2009~~its formation, NPAMLP entered into a leasing and property management agreement with EBL&S Property Management, Inc. (EBL&S), which is owned entirely by E&H. Under the ~~FASB~~agreement, ~~issued~~EBL&S ~~authoritative~~is ~~guidance~~to receive a property management fee equal to ~~improve~~5% of the ~~relevance~~gross annual rentals collected, including ~~representational~~tenant ~~faithfulness~~reimbursements for common area maintenance charges, real estate taxes and ~~comparability~~property ofinsurance. ~~the~~EBL&S ~~information~~is ~~that~~also entitled ato ~~reporting~~receive ~~entity~~leasing ~~provides~~commissions infor ~~its~~obtaining ~~financial~~or ~~statements~~renewing ~~about~~leases ~~(1) a~~and ~~transfer~~reimbursement offor ~~its~~services ~~financial~~provided ~~assets,~~to ~~(2)~~ NPAMLP for partnership administration. The leasing commissions paid or due to EBL&S are amortized over the ~~effects~~life of ~~such~~their arespective ~~transfer~~leases and are included in Accounts receivable and other assets on ~~its~~the ~~financial~~Combined ~~position,~~Balance ~~financial~~Sheet. ~~performance,~~The leasing commissions due to EBL&S are included in Accounts payable and ~~cash~~other ~~flows~~liabilities on the Combined Balance Sheet. Under the terms of the NPAMLP partnership agreement, ~~and~~the ~~(3) a~~managing ~~reporting~~general ~~entity~~partner is entitled to be reimbursed for its expenses for administering NPAMLP’s ~~continuing~~affairs. Such ~~involvement,~~administrative ifexpenses ~~any,~~are inbilled to NPAMLP based on the ~~transferred~~wages ~~financial~~and ~~assets~~time incurred by EBL&S personnel for such services.

Management fees and administrative services are paid exclusively to EBL&S and are included in the Combined Statement of Operations. The ~~guidance~~Wraparound ismortgages ~~effective~~payable are ~~for~~held ~~annual~~by ~~reporting~~NPAEP, ~~periods~~which ~~beginning~~is ~~after~~controlled ~~November 15~~by Lipkin. Due to NPAEP, ~~2009~~unamortized discount and interest expense are all financial statement accounts, ~~for~~which ~~interim~~relate ~~periods~~directly ~~within~~to ~~that~~the ~~first~~Wraparound ~~annual~~mortgages ~~reporting~~payable. ~~period~~Other borrowings represent amounts due to E&H Properties of Delaware, Inc., and ~~for~~a ~~interim~~subsidiary of E&H (EHD). Included within Accounts payable and ~~annual~~other ~~reporting~~liabilities ~~periods~~as ~~thereafter~~of December 31, 2011, ~~with~~are ~~early~~$2,729 ~~adoption~~due ~~prohibited.~~EBL&S, ~~NPAMLP~~$139 due EHD and $207 due limited partnerships where Lipkin has ~~adopted~~a ~~the~~controlling ~~provisions~~interest. As of December 31, 2010 the ~~FASB~~amounts ~~guidance~~included ~~which~~in ~~did~~Accounts ~~not~~payable ~~have~~and other liabilities due to EBL&S, EHD and limited partnerships where Lipkin has a ~~material~~controlling ~~impact~~interest onwere ~~its~~$2,608, ~~combined~~$133 ~~condensed~~and ~~financial~~$224, ~~statements~~respectively. The amounts due to EBL&S were primarily for property management fees, leasing commissions, legal fees, administrative services and cash advances for debt service. Amounts charged by EBL&S to NPAMLP for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to improve financial reporting disclosure by companies nvolved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter, with early adoption prohibited. NPAMLP has adopted the provisions of the guidance which did not have a material impact on its combined financial statements.10

~~F-10~~NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~NATIONAL~~(a ~~PROPERTY~~limited ~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~partnership)

(aNotes ~~limited~~to ~~partnership)~~Combined Financial Statements

~~Notes~~December to31, ~~Combined~~2011 ~~Financial~~and ~~Statements~~2010

~~December~~(dollars ~~31,~~in ~~2010 and 2009~~thousands)

(dollars in thousands)

	2011		2010
Property management fees	$	534	$	563
Leasing commissions		8		14
Administrative services and legal fees		165		226

Total	$	707	$	803

~~(3)~~In ~~Related~~October 2007, NPAEP purchased an 82.4% tenant-~~Party~~in-common ~~Transactions~~interest in one of the two parcels of land in Marquette, Michigan that are ground leased by NPAMLP. The annual ground rent received by NPAEP in 2011 and 2010 was $18. There were no changes to any of the terms of the ground lease as a result of this transaction. In 2011, NPAEP entered into contracts to purchase the remaining 17.6% tenant-in-common interest in the parcel purchased in 2007 and 100% of the other parcel that are ground leased by NPAMLP. After closing of these transactions in 2012, the total annual rent to be paid to NPAEP will be $32.

~~NPAMLP~~In October is2005, ~~owned~~ARJAX ~~99%~~Railroad byAssociates ~~the~~II, ~~limited~~LLC ~~partners~~(“ARJAX”), ~~and~~a 1%limited ~~collectively~~liability company controlled by ~~EBL&S~~Lipkin, ~~Inc.~~acquired from a third party land owner, ~~the~~certain ~~managing~~real ~~general~~property ~~partner~~in ~~and~~San ~~FII~~Mateo, California, that was leased to NPAMLP under a ground lease scheduled to expire in February 2025. Annual rent due under the ~~equity~~ground ~~general~~lease ~~partner~~was $96. ~~EBL&S~~ In the fourth quarter of 2006, ~~Inc.~~NPAMLP ~~assigned~~sold its ~~economic~~ leasehold interest asin ~~general~~the ~~partner~~San Mateo property to ~~FII~~ARJAX. The purchase price for the sale of the leasehold interest was $13,900 and ~~FII~~was based on the fair market value of NPAMLP’s leasehold interest in the San Mateo property was ~~admitted~~determined asby a real estate valuation. Pursuant to the ~~equity~~terms ~~general~~of ~~partner~~the onagreement ~~September~~of 30sale for this transaction the purchase price was satisfied with the conveyance to NPAMLP of a 14.8% tenant-in-common interest in an office building in San Jose, ~~1998~~California. ~~EBL&S~~ To complete the tax-deferred exchange arising from the sales of the New Hope, ~~Inc~~MN and North Sarasota, FL properties in 2006, NPAMLP acquired an additional 9.1% istenant-in-common interest ~~owned~~in bythe ~~E&H~~same ~~Properties~~San Jose, ~~Inc~~CA building. Such interests were acquired from National Property Analysts Management Company (~~E&H~~“NPAMC”), a ~~corporation~~limited ~~owned~~partnership ~~and~~ controlled by ~~Edward~~Lipkin. BAs the term of the lease of the tenant occupying the San Jose property is currently scheduled to expire before the financing on the property is satisfied, the property could be lost to foreclosure at that time. In ~~Lipkin~~order ~~(Lipkin)~~to protect NPAMLP’s interest and to ensure the value of the terms of the consideration received by NPAMLP in exchange for the leasehold interest, NPAMC caused NPAEP to agree to modify the wrap mortgage by offsetting the wrap indebtedness held by NPAEP by an amount equal to the $13,900 purchase price compounded monthly based on a ~~related~~6.43% ~~party~~annual interest rate. The wrap mortgage offset would be calculated at the time of disposition of the San Jose property.

AtA ~~its~~company ~~formation,~~controlled ~~NPAMLP entered into a leasing and property management agreement with EBL&S Property Management, Inc. (EBL&S), which is owned entirely~~ by ~~E&H. Under~~Lipkin holds ~~the~~purchase ~~agreement,~~money ~~EBL&S~~mortgages ison tocertain ~~receive~~properties ~~a property management fee equal to 5%~~ of the gross annual rentals collected, including tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance charges, real estate taxes and property insurance. EBL&S is also entitled to receive leasing commissions for obtaining or renewing leases and reimbursement for services provided to NPAMLP ~~for partnership administration~~. ~~The~~ ~~leasing commissions paid or due to EBL&S are deferred over the life of their respective leases and are included in Other assets on the Balance Sheet.~~ The ~~leasing~~purchase ~~commissions~~money ~~due~~mortgages toaggregated approximately ~~EBL&S~~$5,165 ~~are included in Accounts payable~~ and ~~other~~$7,696 ~~liabilities~~at onDecember ~~the Balance Sheet. Under the terms of the NPAMLP partnership agreement~~31, ~~the~~2011 ~~managing general partner is entitled to be reimbursed for its expenses for administering NPAMLP’s affairs. Such administrative expenses are billed to NPAMLP based on the wages~~ and ~~time~~2010, ~~incurred by EBL&S personnel for such services~~respectively.

Management fees and administrative services are paid exclusively to EBL&S and are included in the Combined Statement of Operations. The Wraparound mortgages payable are held by NPAEP, which is controlled by Lipkin. Due to NPAEP, unamortized discount and interest expense are all financial statement accounts, which relate directly to the Wraparound mortgages payable. Other borrowings represent amounts due to E&H Properties of Delaware, Inc., a subsidiary of E&H (~~EHD~~4)~~. Included~~ ~~within~~Tenant Accounts payable and other liabilities as of December 31, 2010, are $2,608 due EBL&S, $133 due EHD and $224 due limited partnerships where Lipkin has a controlling interest. As of December 31, 2009 the amounts included in Accounts payable and other liabilities due to EBL&S, EHD and limited partnerships where Lipkin has a controlling interest were $2,448, $126 and $239, respectively. The amounts due to EBL&S were primarily for property management fees, leasing commissions, legal fees, administrative services and cash advances for debt service. Amounts earned by EBL&S for the years ended December 31 were as follows:Leases

	2010		2009
Property management fees	$	563	$	572
Leasing commissions		14		19
Administrative services and legal fees		226		191
Total	$	803	$	782

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, NPAMLP effectively owned and operated 24 properties that were comprised principally of shopping centers and free standing, single-tenant retail stores with approximately 80 tenants, under various lease agreements which are treated as operating leases.

~~F-11~~In addition to minimum rental payments, the leases generally provide for additional rents based on operating results of the tenants, reimbursement for certain common area maintenance charges, real estate taxes and property insurance and renewal options. The leases expire under their original terms at various dates between 2012 and 2035.

~~NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~11

(aNATIONAL ~~limited~~PROPERTY ~~partnership)~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~Notes~~(a tolimited ~~Combined Financial Statements~~partnership)

~~December~~Notes ~~31,~~to ~~2010~~Combined ~~and~~Financial ~~2009~~Statements

~~(dollars~~December in31, ~~thousands)~~2011 and 2010

In(dollars ~~October 2007, NPAEP purchased an 82.4% tenant-~~in~~-common~~ interest in one of the parcels of land in Marquette, Michigan that is ground leased by NPAMLP. The annual ground rent received by NPAEP will be $18. There were no changes to any of the terms of the ground lease as a result of this transaction.thousands)

InFuture ~~October~~minimum 2005, ARJAX Railroad Associates II, LLC (“ARJAX”), a limited liability company controlled by Lipkin, acquired from a third party land owner, certain real property in San Mateo, California, that was leased to NPAMLP under a ground lease ~~scheduled~~ rentals to ~~expire~~be inreceived ~~February 2025. Annual rent due~~ under ~~the~~noncancellable ~~ground~~leases ~~lease~~through ~~was $96. In~~ the ~~fourth~~termination ~~quarter~~ of ~~2006,~~ NPAMLP ~~sold~~at ~~its~~December ~~leasehold~~31, ~~interest~~2013 in(see ~~the~~Note ~~San~~15), ~~Mateo~~and ~~property to ARJAX. The purchase price for~~ the ~~sale~~ terms of the ~~leasehold~~leases ~~interest was $13~~thereafter,~~900~~ ~~and~~are ~~was based on the fair market value of~~approximately:

NPAMLP’s leasehold interest in the San Mateo property as determined by a national valuation firm familiar with similar commercial properties and real estate in the San Mateo geographic area. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement of sale for this transaction the purchase price was satisfied with the conveyance to NPAMLP of a 14.8% tenant-in-common interest in an office building in San Jose, California. To complete the tax-deferred exchange arising from the sales of the New Hope, MN and North Sarasota, FL properties in 2006, NPAMLP acquired an additional 9.1% tenant-in-common interest in the same San Jose, CA building. Such interests were acquired from National Property Analysts Management Company (“NPAMC”), a limited partnership controlled by Lipkin. As the term of the lease of the tenant occupying the San Jose property is currently scheduled to expire before the financing on the property is satisfied, the property could be lost to foreclosure at that time. In order to protect NPAMLP’s interest and to ensure the value of the terms of the consideration received by NPAMLP in exchange for the leasehold interest, NPAMC caused NPAEP to agree to modify the wrap mortgage by offsetting the wrap indebtedness held by NPAEP by an amount equal to the $13,900 purchase price compounded monthly based on a 6.43% annual interest rate. The wrap mortgage offset would be calculated at the time of disposition of the San Jose property.

2012	$	11,558
2013		8,986
Thereafter		41,193

Total	$	61,737

~~NPA~~Rental ~~and~~income ~~its~~includes ~~principals~~approximately ~~owned~~$179 ~~4,362 of the 100,000 units of NPAMLP as of December 31, 1997. During 1998, NPA~~ and ~~its principals redeemed their interests in NPAMLP in exchange for the transfer of the Trenton~~$176, ~~New Jersey property and~~ related ~~wraparound~~to ~~mortgage~~percentage ~~obligations. As~~rents afor ~~result, NPA and its principals did not own any of~~ the ~~97,752~~years ~~units~~ended ~~of NPAMLP at~~ December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010, respectively.

~~NPA~~(5) ~~holds~~Major ~~purchase money mortgages on certain properties of NPAMLP. The purchase money mortgages aggregated approximately $7,696 and $8,372 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.~~Tenants

NPAMLP’s primary anchor tenants are Sun Microsystems, Sears Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries (4“Sears”) ~~Tenant~~and ~~Leases~~CVS Corporation (“CVS”). In 2011 and 2010, Sun Microsystems accounted for approximately 26% and 25%, respectively, of the rental income received by NPAMLP. In 2011 and 2010, Sears accounted for approximately 17% of the rental income received by NPAMLP and CVS accounted for approximately 14% of the rental income received by NPAMLP. As of December 31, 2011, NPAMLP had 1 lease with Sun Microsystems for approximately 250,000 square feet. As of December 31, 2011, NPAMLP had 6 leases with Sears aggregating approximately 620,000 square feet and 5 leases with CVS aggregating approximately 57,000 square feet. As of December 31, 2011 there was no balance due from Sears under any of its leases. As of December 31, 2010, NPAMLP was due $84 from Sears under its leases. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, NPAMLP was due $2 from CVS under its leases. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, no amounts were due from Sun Microsystems.

At December 31, ~~2010~~2011, ~~and~~two ~~2009,~~tenants owed NPAMLP ~~effectively~~amounts ~~owned~~in ~~and~~excess ~~operated~~of 2410% ~~properties~~of ~~that~~total ~~were~~Accounts ~~comprised~~receivable. ~~principally~~Grandview ofRetail ~~shopping~~Stores ~~centers~~and Empire Chinese represented 48%, and ~~free~~20%, ~~standing~~respectively, ~~single-tenant~~of ~~retail~~Accounts ~~stores~~receivable ~~with~~at ~~approximately~~December 8031, 2011. At December 31, 2010, three tenants owed NPAMLP amounts in excess of 10% of total Accounts receivable. Sears, ~~under~~Grandview ~~various~~Retail ~~lease~~Stores ~~agreements~~and ~~which~~Supremo ~~are~~Foods ~~treated~~represented as38%, ~~operating~~23% ~~leases~~and 18%, respectively, of Accounts receivable at December 31, 2010.

In(6) ~~addition~~Disposal ~~to minimum rental payments, the leases generally provide for additional rents based on operating results~~ of ~~the~~Long-Lived tenants, reimbursement for certain common area maintenance charges, real estate taxes and property insurance and renewal options. The leases expire under their original terms at various dates between 2011 and 2035.Assets

~~F-12~~Income or loss from operations of sold properties is reported as discontinued operations in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance. Accordingly, the results of operations of properties disposed of or held for sale are classified as Discontinued operations in the Combined Statement of Operations and Changes in Partners’ Deficit. In 2010, a portion of the Taylorville, Illinois property was conveyed to the City of Taylorville in lieu of eminent domain. As a result of this transaction, NPAMLP recognized a net gain on disposition of properties of $54.

~~NATIONAL~~(7) ~~PROPERTY~~Ground ~~ANALYSTS~~Leases ~~MASTER~~/ ~~LIMITED~~Finance ~~PARTNERSHIP~~Lease Obligation

(aNPAMLP ~~limited~~is ~~partnership)~~obligated under 11 noncancellable ground leases that expire between 2012 and 2078, excluding renewal options.

~~Notes~~During the year ended December 31, 1991, NPAMLP sold the land underlying the Kalamazoo, Michigan; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Seven Hills, Ohio properties and simultaneously entered into ground leases to ~~Combined~~leaseback ~~Financial~~the ~~Statements~~land from the buyer that expire between 2012 and 2015. Under the terms of the above 1991 sales, at the expiration of the respective ground leases, including renewal options, title to the buildings will be conveyed to the buyer with no additional consideration and any amounts still outstanding under the respective wraparound mortgages will remain the liability of NPAMLP.

~~December 31, 2010 and 2009~~12

~~(dollars~~NATIONAL inPROPERTY ~~thousands)~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~Future~~(a ~~minimum~~limited ~~lease rentals to be received under noncancellable leases are approximately:~~partnership)

2011		11,063
2012		10,154
2013		7,270
Thereafter		36,873
Total	$	65,360

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

~~Rental income includes approximately $176 and $180, related to percentage rents for the years ended~~ December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009, respectively.~~2010

(5)dollars ~~Major~~in ~~Tenants~~thousands)

~~NPAMLP’s~~The ~~primary~~aggregate ~~anchor~~proceeds ~~tenants~~from the ~~are~~three ~~Sun~~land ~~Microsystems,~~sales ~~Sears~~were ~~Holdings~~$1,750 ~~Corporation~~ and ~~its~~were ~~subsidiaries~~recorded ~~(“Sears”)~~as ~~and~~Finance ~~CVS~~lease ~~Corporation (“CVS”)~~obligations. InThe ~~2010~~amounts ~~and~~paid ~~2009,~~in ~~Sun~~accordance ~~Microsystems~~with ~~accounted~~these ~~for~~ground leases ~~approximately~~were ~~25%~~$418 and ~~23%,~~$349 ~~respectively,~~for of the ~~rental~~years ~~income~~ended ~~received~~December ~~by NPAMLP. In 2010 and 2009~~31, ~~Sears~~2011 ~~accounted for approximately 17%~~ and ~~18%~~2010, respectively, ofand ~~the~~are ~~rental~~recorded ~~income~~as ~~received~~interest byexpense. ~~NPAMLP~~Any gain ~~and~~or ~~CVS~~loss ~~accounted~~from ~~for approximately 14% of~~ the ~~rental~~transactions ~~income~~will ~~received~~be byrecognized ~~NPAMLP. As~~at ofthe ~~December~~date ~~31,~~upon ~~2010,~~which ~~NPAMLP~~title ~~had~~to 1the ~~lease~~buildings ~~with~~is ~~Sun~~conveyed ~~Microsystems~~to ~~for~~the ~~approximately~~ground ~~250,000~~lessor. During ~~square~~the ~~feet. As~~term of ~~December~~these ~~31,~~ground ~~2010, NPAMLP had 6~~ leases ~~with Sears aggregating approximately 620~~,~~000~~ ~~square~~including ~~feet~~renewal ~~and 5 leases with CVS aggregating approximately 57~~options,~~000~~ ~~square~~NPAMLP ~~feet.~~is Asresponsible offor ~~December~~maintaining ~~31,~~the ~~2010~~buildings and ~~2009~~building improvements, ~~NPAMLP~~as ~~was~~well ~~due~~as ~~$84~~making ~~and~~the ~~$92, respectively, from Sears under its leases. As of December 31, 2010 NPAMLP was due $2 from CVS under its~~ respective ~~leases.~~mortgage ~~As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, no amounts were due from Sun Microsystems~~payments.

AtIn ~~December~~January 312012, ~~2010,~~the ~~three~~ground lease ~~tenants~~on ~~owed~~the ~~NPAMLP~~Seven ~~amounts in excess of 10% of total Accounts receivable. Sears~~Hills, ~~Grandview~~Ohio ~~Retail~~property ~~Stores~~terminated ~~and~~in ~~Supremo~~accordance ~~Foods~~with ~~represented~~its ~~39%,~~terms ~~23%~~ and ~~18%,~~the ~~respectively,~~buildings ofwere ~~Accounts~~effectively ~~receivable~~conveyed atto the ~~December~~ground ~~31, 2010~~owner. At ~~December~~As ~~31,~~a ~~2009,~~result ~~three~~of ~~tenants~~this ~~owed~~transaction, NPAMLP ~~amounts~~will inrecognize ~~excess~~a ofgain ~~10%~~from ofthe ~~total~~disposition ~~Accounts~~of ~~receivable. Sears,~~this ~~Grandview~~property ~~Retail~~in ~~Stores~~the ~~and~~first quarter ~~Roundy’s~~of ~~represented~~2012 ~~51%, 17% and 13%, respectively,~~ of ~~Accounts~~approximately ~~receivable at December 31, 2009~~$356.

Future minimum lease payments under all noncancellable ground leases through the termination of NPAMLP at December 31, 2013 (6see Note 15), ~~Disposal~~and the terms of ~~Long-Lived~~the ~~Assets~~ground leases thereafter, as of December 31, 2011 are approximately:

Income or loss from operations of sold properties is reported as discontinued operations in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance. Accordingly, the results of operations of properties disposed of or held for sale are classified as Discontinued operations in the Combined Statement of Operations and Changes in Partners’ Deficit. In 2010, a portion of the Taylorville, Illinois property was conveyed to the City of Taylorville in lieu of eminent domain. As a result of this transaction, NPAMLP recognized a net gain on disposition of properties of $54.

2012	$	1,100
2013		940
Thereafter		7,252
	$	9,292

~~(7)~~Total ~~Ground~~payments ~~Leases~~for /rental ~~Finance~~under ~~Lease~~all ~~Obligation~~ground leases for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $1,154 and $1,085, respectively.

~~NPAMLP~~(8) isOther ~~obligated under 11 noncancellable ground leases that expire between 2011 and 2078, excluding renewal options.~~Borrowings

~~During~~NPAMLP ~~the~~has ~~year~~a ~~ended~~line ~~December~~of 31credit with E&H Properties of Delaware, ~~1991~~Inc. (EHD), ~~NPAMLP~~a ~~sold~~related ~~the~~party, ~~land~~for ~~underlying~~EHD ~~the~~to ~~Chesapeake,~~advance ~~Virginia;~~up ~~Fairborn~~to $2,500 ~~Ohio;~~to ~~Kalamazoo,~~NPAMLP ~~Michigan;~~for ~~Philadelphia,~~the ~~Pennsylvania~~purpose of making capital and ~~Seven~~tenant ~~Hills,~~improvements ~~Ohio~~to the properties. ~~and~~Pursuant ~~simultaneously~~to ~~entered~~the ~~into~~resulting ~~ground~~agreement, ~~leases~~the obligation of EHD to ~~leaseback~~make advances to NPAMLP is at all times the ~~land~~sole ~~from~~and absolute discretion of EHD. The line bears interest based on the ~~buyer~~prime ~~that~~rate ~~expire~~(3.25% ~~between~~at ~~2003~~December 31, 2011) and ~~2015~~is scheduled to expire in May 2012. Any amounts advanced to NPAMLP are not directly secured by any collateral.

~~F-13~~As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, $194 was owed by NPAMLP under this line of credit, excluding $139 and $133 in accrued interest at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total interest expense under the line of credit for each of the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010, was $6.

~~NATIONAL~~(9) ~~PROPERTY~~Wraparound ~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Mortgages

(aThe ~~limited~~properties ~~partnership)~~combined in NPAMLP are subject to nonrecourse wraparound mortgages. The wraparound mortgages are cross-collateralized among the properties owned by NPAMLP. The wraparound mortgages are generally secured by liens on the properties and are subordinate to the third-party underlying mortgage obligations and the purchase money mortgages, collectively the senior mortgage obligations. The wraparound mortgages are payable to NPAEP, and NPAEP is liable to the holders of the senior mortgage obligations. Generally each wraparound mortgage is secured by liens on specific properties and is subordinate to the senior mortgage obligations as stated above. The wraparound mortgages are not subject to any financial covenants.

~~Notes to Combined Financial Statements~~13

~~December~~NATIONAL ~~31,~~PROPERTY ~~2010~~ANALYSTS ~~and~~MASTER ~~2009~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(~~dollars~~a inlimited ~~thousands~~partnership)

~~The~~Notes aggregate proceeds from the five land sales were $2,650 and were recorded as Finance lease obligations. The amounts paid in accordance with these ground leases were $349 and $280 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are recorded as interest expense. Any gain or loss from the transactions will be recognized at the date upon which title to ~~the~~Combined ~~buildings~~Financial is conveyed to the ground lessor. During the term of these ground leases, including renewal options, NPAMLP is responsible for maintaining the buildings and building improvements, as well as making the respective mortgage payments.Statements

Under the terms of the above 1991 sales, at the expiration of the respective 1991 ground leases, including renewal options, title to the buildings will be conveyed to the buyer with no additional consideration and any amounts still outstanding under the respective wraparound mortgages will remain the liability of NPAMLP. Future minimum lease payments under all noncancellable ground leases as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 ~~are~~and ~~approximately:~~2010

2011		1,154
2012		1,109
2013		940
Thereafter		7,252
	$	10,455

(dollars in thousands)

~~Total~~In ~~payments~~prior ~~for~~years, ~~rental~~NPAEP ~~under~~had ~~ground~~forgiven the ~~leases~~wraparound ~~for~~mortgages remaining after the ~~years~~disposition ~~ended~~of ~~December~~properties 31that were owned by NPAMLP. In accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, ~~2010~~such ~~and~~forgiveness ~~2009~~from a related party is accounted for as a capital transaction. There was ~~approximately~~no ~~$1,085~~forgiveness ~~and~~of ~~$1,103,~~wraparound mortgage ~~respectively~~indebtedness in 2011 and 2010.

~~(8)~~NPAMLP ~~Other~~adjusts ~~Borrowings~~the discount on wraparound mortgages for changes in the projected cash flows. The resultant increase or decrease in the discount is recorded as interest expense in the year of the adjustment. Changes in projected cash flows result primarily from management's re-evaluation of projected cash flows from tenants as well as additional principal payments arising from property sales. In 2011, NPAMLP decreased the discount on wraparound mortgages and recognized an increase in interest expense in the amount of $211. In 2010, NPAMLP increased the discount on wraparound mortgages and recognized a reduction in interest expense in the amount of $145.

~~NPAMLP~~The ~~has~~wraparound amortgages ~~line~~are scheduled ~~of credit with E&H Properties of Delaware, Inc. (EHD), a related party, for EHD~~ to ~~advance~~mature upon toDecember $231,~~500~~ to2013 ~~NPAMLP for the purpose of making capital~~ and ~~tenant~~have ~~improvements~~a tostated ~~the~~interest ~~properties. Pursuant~~rate ~~to the resulting agreement, the obligation~~ of ~~EHD~~4.1%. toCertain ~~make~~wraparound ~~advances~~mortgages toare ~~NPAMLP~~fully isamortized over ~~at all times~~ the ~~sole~~life ~~and absolute discretion~~ of ~~EHD. The line bears interest based on~~ the ~~prime~~mortgage ~~rate~~loan ~~(3.25%~~while atother ~~December~~wraparound ~~31,~~mortgages ~~2010)~~require ~~and~~balloon ispayments ~~scheduled~~ to ~~expire~~satisfy inthe ~~May~~wraparound ~~2011~~mortgage obligations. ~~Any~~Wraparound ~~amounts~~mortgage ~~advanced~~principal topayment ~~NPAMLP~~requirements ~~are~~for ~~not~~the ~~directly~~next ~~secured~~two byyears ~~any~~are ~~collateral.~~approximately:

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, $194 was owed by NPAMLP under this line of credit, excluding $133 and $126 in accrued interest at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total interest expense under the line of credit for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009, was $6.

2012		$	11,867
2013			128,624

(910) ~~Wraparound~~Investment ~~Mortgages~~Securities Available for Sale

~~The~~Investments ~~properties combined~~ in ~~NPAMLP~~available ~~are~~for sale ~~subject~~mutual tofunds nonrecourse wraparound mortgages. The wraparound mortgages are cross-collateralized among the properties owned by NPAMLP. The wraparound mortgages are generally secured by liens on the properties and ~~are~~common ~~subordinate~~stock tosecurities ~~the~~were ~~third-party~~as ~~underlying~~follows ~~mortgage~~as ~~obligations~~of ~~and~~December ~~the purchase money mortgages~~31, ~~collectively the senior mortgage obligations. The wraparound mortgages are payable to NPAEP~~2011, and NPAEP is liable to the holders of the senior mortgage obligations. Generally each wraparound mortgage is secured by liens on specific properties and is subordinate to the senior mortgage obligations as stated above. The wraparound mortgages are not subject to any financial covenants.2010:

F-14

	December 31, 2011
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Market Value

Exchange traded funds	$	760	$	-	$	(8	)	$	752
Mutual funds		700		-		(11	)		689

		-		-		-			-
Securities available for sale	$	1,460	$	-	$	(19	)	$	1,441

NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Market Value

Common stock	$	1,163	$	32	$	-		$	1,195
Mutual funds		1,966		63		(3	)		2,026

Securities available for sale	$	3,129	$	95	$	(3	)	$	3,221

~~(a limited partnership)~~14

~~Notes~~NATIONAL toPROPERTY ~~Combined~~ANALYSTS ~~Financial~~MASTER ~~Statements~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~December~~(a ~~31,~~limited ~~2010 and 2009~~partnership)

~~(dollars~~Notes into ~~thousands)~~Combined Financial Statements

InDecember ~~prior years~~31, ~~NPAEP~~2011 had forgiven the wraparound mortgages remaining after the disposition of properties that were owned by NPAMLP. In accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, such forgiveness from a related party is accounted for as a capital transaction. There was no forgiveness of wraparound mortgage indebtedness in 2010 and ~~2009.~~2010

~~NPAMLP~~(dollars ~~adjusts the discount on wraparound mortgages for changes~~ in the projected cash flows. The resultant increase or decrease in the discount is recorded as interest expense in the year of the adjustment. Changes in projected cash flows result primarily from management's re-evaluation of projected cash flows from tenants as well as additional principal payments arising from property sales. In 2010, NPAMLP increased the discount on wraparound mortgages and recognized a reduction in interest expense in the amount of $145, and in 2009, NPAMLP increased the discount on wraparound mortgages and recognized a reduction in interest expense in the amount of $597.thousands)

The wraparound mortgages are scheduled to mature on December 31, 2013 and have a stated interest rate of 4.1%. Certain wraparound mortgages are fully amortized over the life of the mortgage loan while other wraparound mortgages require balloon payments to satisfy the wraparound mortgage obligations. Wraparound mortgage principal payment requirements for the next three (311) ~~years~~Partners’ ~~are approximately:~~Deficit

2011			8,265
2012			8,571
2013			131,894

Following is a summary of the combined changes in partners’ deficit for the two years ended December 31, 2011 (in thousands except unit data):

(10) Investment Securities Available for Sale

	Units						Partners’ Deficit
	General Partners		Limited Partners		Total		General partners			Limited partners			Total

January 1, 2010,		1,000		96,752		97,752	$	(450	)	$	(45,944	)	$	(46,394	)

Net loss		-		-		-		(78	)		(7,769	)		(7,847	)

Other comprehensive income: net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities		-		-		-		4			35			39

December 31, 2010		1,000		96,752		97,752	$	(524	)	$	(53,678	)	$	(54,202	)

Net loss		-		-		-		(80	)		(7,871	)		(7,951	)
Other comprehensive income: net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities		-		-		-		(1	)		(113	)		(114	)

December 31, 2011		1,000		96,752		97,752	$	(605	)	$	(61,662	)	$	(62,267	)

~~Investments~~Accumulated inother ~~available~~comprehensive ~~for~~income ~~sale~~(loss) ~~mutual~~was ~~funds~~ $(19) and ~~common~~$95 ~~stock~~at ~~securities~~December ~~were~~31, as2011 ~~follows~~and as2010, ofrespectively. ~~December~~Comprehensive ~~31,~~income ~~2010,~~includes net income (loss) and ~~2009:~~the net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities.

	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Market Value
Common stock	$	1,163	$	32	$	-		$	1,195
Mutual funds		1,966		63		(3	)	$	2,026
Securities available for sale	$	3,129	$	95	$	(3	)	$	3,221
	December 31, 2009
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Market Value
Mutual funds	$	3,165	$	71	$	(18	)	$	3,218
Securities available for sale	$	3,165	$	71	$	(18	)	$	3,218

(12)

Commitments and Contingencies

~~F-15~~Upon NPAMLP’s formation, the titles of the properties of were to be transferred to NPAMLP. State and local laws vary with respect to transfer taxes and are susceptible to varying interpretations. NPAMLP’s interpretation of the laws relating to these transfer taxes could result in significant adjustments if successfully challenged by the respective taxing authority; however, a reasonable estimation of the potential liability, if any, cannot be made at this time.

~~NATIONAL~~NPAMLP ~~PROPERTY~~is ~~ANALYSTS~~involved ~~MASTER~~in ~~LIMITED~~various claims ~~PARTNERSHIP~~and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of property operations. In the opinion of the managing general partner, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on NPAMLP’s combined financial statements.

~~(a limited partnership)~~15

~~Notes~~NATIONAL toPROPERTY ~~Combined~~ANALYSTS ~~Financial~~MASTER ~~Statements~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

~~December~~(a ~~31,~~limited ~~2010 and 2009~~partnership)

~~(dollars~~Notes into ~~thousands)~~Combined Financial Statements

~~(11)~~December ~~Partners’~~31, ~~Deficit~~2011 and 2010

~~Following~~(dollars ~~is a summary of the combined changes~~ in ~~partners’ deficit for the two years ended December 31, 2010 (in~~ thousands ~~except unit data~~):

	Units						Partners’ Deficit
	General		Limited				General			Limited
	Partners		Partners		Total		Partners			Partners			Total
January 1, 2009,		1,000		96,752		97,752		(415	)		(39,644	)		(40,059	)
Net loss		-		-		-		(42	)		(6,360	)		(6,402	)
Net change in unrealized gain on investment securities		-		-		-		7			60			67
December 31, 2009		1,000		96,752		97,752	$	(450	)	$	(45,944	)	$	(46,394	)
Net loss		-		-		-		(78	)		(7,769	)		(7,847	)
Net change in unrealized gain on investment securities		-		-		-		4			35			39
December 31, 2010		1,000		96,752		97,752	$	(524	)	$	(53,678	)	$	(54,202	)

In June 2006, NPAMLP and a limited liability company controlled by Lipkin (“ARJAX”) entered into an agreement with an anchor tenant (the “Agreement”), whereby the lease with the anchor tenant would be assigned to NPAMLP or ARJAX effective February 2009 (the “Effective Date”). In consideration for the assignment, the anchor tenant would receive payments totaling $2,550 during the period from June 2006 through the Effective Date. To date, ARJAX has remitted $1,400 to the anchor tenant in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. In addition, the anchor tenant will be obligated to complete, by the Effective Date, $500 in repairs or improvements to six other stores leased from NPAMLP, which would otherwise be the responsibility of NPAMLP. Under the Agreement, the commitment to the anchor tenant is borne by ARJAX and NPAMLP, however it is anticipated that ARJAX shall fund all of the consideration due. In September 2006, NPAMLP sold the property encumbered by the affected anchor tenant lease to ARJAX. NPAMLP would be liable for the payments required under the Agreement should ARJAX fail to do so. Lipkin has personally guaranteed the obligations to the anchor tenant under the Agreement. In June 2008, the Agreement was amended extending the Effective Date to January 31, 2011. In December 2010, the Agreement was amended further extending the Effective Date to February 28, 2014.

(1213) ~~Commitments~~Disclosure ~~and~~of ~~Contingencies~~Fair Value of Financial Instruments

~~Upon~~In ~~NPAMLP’s~~addition ~~formation,~~to the ~~titles~~disclosures in Note 14 for assets which are recorded at fair value, GAAP also requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the ~~properties~~balance ofsheet, ~~were~~for towhich beit ~~transferred~~is practicable to ~~NPAMLP~~estimate that value. ~~State~~ ~~and~~The ~~local~~following disclosure ~~laws~~of ~~vary~~estimated ~~with~~fair ~~respect~~value towas ~~transfer~~determined ~~taxes~~by ~~and~~NPAMLP ~~are~~using ~~susceptible~~available tomarket ~~varying~~information ~~interpretations~~and appropriate valuation methodologies. ~~NPAMLP’s~~However, considerable ~~interpretation~~judgment ofis necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the ~~laws~~estimates presented ~~relating~~herein toare ~~these~~not ~~transfer~~necessarily ~~taxes~~indicative ~~could~~of ~~result~~the inamounts ~~significant~~NPAMLP ~~adjustments~~could ifrealize ~~successfully~~on ~~challenged~~disposition byof the ~~respective~~financial ~~taxing~~instruments at ~~authority;~~December ~~however~~31, a2011 ~~reasonable~~and ~~estimation~~2010. The use of ~~the~~different ~~potential~~market ~~liability,~~assumptions ifand/or ~~any,~~estimation ~~cannot~~methodologies bemay ~~made~~have ata ~~this~~material effect ~~time~~on the estimated fair value amounts.

~~NPAMLP~~(14) isFair ~~involved~~Value in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of property operations. In the opinion of the managing general partner, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on NPAMLP’s combined financial statements.Measurements

~~F-16~~NPAMLP applies the guidance of the FASB regarding fair value measurements. The guidance establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. This guidance does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

~~NATIONAL~~The ~~PROPERTY~~guidance ~~ANALYSTS~~utilizes ~~MASTER~~a ~~LIMITED~~fair ~~PARTNERSHIP~~value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

(a· ~~limited~~Level ~~partnership~~1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

~~Notes~~· toLevel ~~Combined~~2: ~~Financial~~Inputs ~~Statements~~other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

~~December~~· ~~31,~~Level ~~2010~~3: ~~and~~Unobservable ~~2009~~inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions

~~(dollars~~The infollowing ~~thousands)~~is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

~~(13)~~NATIONAL ~~Disclosure~~PROPERTY ofANALYSTS ~~Fair~~MASTER ~~Value of Financial Instruments~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

In addition to the disclosures in Note 14 for assets which are recorded at fair value, GAAP also requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The following disclosure of estimated fair value was determined by NPAMLP using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts NPAMLP could realize on disposition of the financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have (a ~~material~~limited ~~effect on the estimated fair value amounts.~~partnership)

~~Cash~~Notes ~~equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values due~~ to ~~their~~Combined ~~short~~Financial ~~term nature as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Marketable securities are carried at fair value and valued based on quoted market prices in an exchange and active markets.~~Statements

~~Management estimates that the carrying value approximates the estimated fair value of the wraparound mortgages at~~ December 31, ~~2010~~2011 and December 31, 2009. In accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, NPAMLP has determined the estimated fair value of its wraparound mortgages based on discounted future cash flows at a current market rate. Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2010 ~~and December 31, 2009.~~

(~~14)~~dollars ~~Fair~~in ~~Value Measurements~~thousands)

~~NPAMLP~~Level ~~applies~~1 ~~the~~Fair ~~guidance~~Value ofMeasurements the FASB regarding fair value measurements. The guidance establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. This guidance does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

~~F-17~~Mutual funds and common stock are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets, which represent the net asset values of shares held by NPAMLP at period end and are classified as Level 1 investments.

~~NATIONAL~~Level ~~PROPERTY~~2 ~~ANALYSTS~~Fair ~~MASTER~~Value ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~Measurements

(aThere ~~limited~~are ~~partnership)~~no level 2 inputs used in the valuation.

~~Notes~~Level to3 ~~Combined~~Fair ~~Financial~~Value ~~Statements~~Measurements

~~December~~There ~~31,~~were ~~2010~~no ~~and~~Level ~~2009~~3 inputs used in the valuation.

(dollars in thousands)

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using Fair Value Heirarchy
	Fair Value as of December 31, 2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investment Securities:
Exchange traded funds:
US Treasury short term bonds	$	752	$	752	$	-	$	-
Mutual funds:
US Treasury short term bonds		689		689		-		-

Total	$	1,441	$	1,441	$	-	$	-

The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:17

·NATIONAL ~~Level~~PROPERTY 1:ANALYSTS ~~Observable~~MASTER ~~inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

·(a ~~Level~~limited 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.partnership)

·Notes ~~Level~~to 3:Combined ~~Unobservable~~Financial ~~inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions~~Statements

~~The~~December ~~following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the investments measured at fair value~~31, ~~including~~2011 ~~the~~and ~~general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:~~2010

~~Level~~(dollars 1in ~~Fair Value Measurements~~thousands)

Mutual funds and common stock are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets, which represent the net asset values of shares held by NPAMLP at period end and are classified as Level 1 investments.

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	Fair Value as of December 31, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Common stocks:
Financial services	$	121	$	121	$	-	$	-
Exchange traded funds:
US treasury bonds		886		886		-		-
Large cap		56		56		-		-
Mid cap		27		27		-		-
Emerging markets		130		130		-		-
Specialty funds		150		150		-		-
Mutual funds:						-		-
Balanced funds		447		447		-		-
US treasury bonds		911		911		-		-
Foreign Bonds		255		255		-		-
Real estate funds		92		92		-		-
Other		146		146		-		-

Total	$	3,221	$	3,221	$	-	$	-

~~Level~~(15) 2Future ~~Fair~~Interest ~~Value Measurements~~Agreement

~~There~~In ~~were~~March no2003 ~~Level~~NPAMLP, 2NPAEP ~~inputs~~and PVPG, ~~used~~entered into an Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2003 (the “2003 Agreement”), in which NPAEP and PVPG agreed with NPAMLP to modify the ~~valuation~~terms of Wrap Mortgages held by NPAEP and PVPG. The terms of the 2003 Agreement provided that NPAEP and PVPG: (a) reduce to 4.1% per year the annual interest rate payable on any NPAEP Wrap Note or PVPG Wrap Note that bears a stated annual interest rate in excess of that amount (the reduction in the interest rate was evaluated by NPAMLP in accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, and was determined not to be a substantial modification of terms as defined therein); (b) remove certain of the properties secured by the NPAEP and PVPG Wrap Mortgages from the burden of the cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions currently contemplated by the Restructuring Agreement effective as of January 1, 1990 by and among MLPG, NPAMLP, National Property Analysts, Inc. and others; and (c) agree to release the lien of the Wrap Mortgages from the Properties upon a sale of or the assignment of a leasehold estate in any Property prior to the maturity of the applicable Wrap Note.

~~Level 3 Fair Value Measurements~~18

~~There~~NATIONAL ~~were~~PROPERTY noANALYSTS ~~Level~~MASTER ~~3 inputs used in the valuation.~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	Fair Value as of December 31, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Common stock	$	1,195	$	1,195	$	-	$	-
Mutual funds		2,026		2,026		-		-
Total	$	3,221	$	3,221	$	-	$	-

(a limited partnership)

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using Fair Value Hierarchy
	Fair Value as of December 31, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Mutual funds	$	3,218	$	3,218	$	-	$	-
Total	$	3,218	$	3,218	$	-	$	-

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

~~F-18~~December 31, 2011 and 2010

~~NATIONAL~~(dollars ~~PROPERTY~~in ~~ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~thousands)

In consideration for the above, NPAMLP modified the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages to provide that (i) there is an event of default under the applicable NPAEP Wrap Mortgages or PVPG Wrap Mortgages, as the case may be, if a ~~limited~~judgment ~~partnership~~or other lien is entered against the title or lease-holding entity thereby entitling NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, to avail itself of the post-default rights or remedies under the relevant security document; and (ii) for cross-default and cross-collateralization among the Unaudited Partnerships and, separately, among the Audited Partnerships. In addition NPAMLP shall execute and deliver to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, a currently recordable deed of future interest (or assignment of future leasehold interest) sufficient to convey to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, all of NPAMLP’s right, title, interest and estate in and to its fee or leasehold interest in the encumbered properties effective upon the maturity on December 31, 2013 of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages unless the Wrap Mortgages have previously been paid in full.

~~December~~As 31a result of the faster repayment of principal, ~~2010~~the Limited Partners will recognize additional taxable income (or smaller tax losses) in each year from 2003 until the maturity of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and ~~2009~~the PVPG Wrap Mortgages. In addition, the anticipated date of dissolution of NPAMLP will now occur in 2013 rather than 2015. Further, because the reduced interest rate is below the Applicable Federal Rate (“AFR”) prescribed under Section 1274, Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, investors in certain Partnerships recognized non-recurring ordinary income (forgiveness of indebtedness) in 2003. The tax impact of this recognition will depend upon numerous factors related to each investor’s particular tax situation, including his marginal tax rate and his suspended passive losses from prior years.

The Wrap Mortgages owned by NPAEP are due and payable in substantial “balloon” amounts on December 31, 2013. Assuming no sales of Properties by NPAMLP in the interim period (~~dollars~~2012 through 2013) the projected balance due for all of the Wrap Mortgages at December 31, 2013 is expected to approximate $109,000. As described above, in ~~thousands~~return for the reduction in interest rate and other consideration set forth above, including the satisfaction of the Wrap Mortgages due on December 31, 2013, NPAMLP’s general partner has agreed to deliver deeds of future interest and assignments of leasehold interest, to be recorded currently, effective December 31, 2013, to NPAEP. NPAMLP’s Managing General Partner has determined that it is in the best interests of NPAMLP and its partners to do so. The effect of these deeds and assignments will be to facilitate a transfer of fee and leasehold ownership to the holders of the Wrap Mortgages at maturity (unless the Wrap Mortgages have been previously paid in full). Notwithstanding the foregoing, NPAEP has agreed in the 2003 Agreement to (a) release the liens of the Wrap Mortgages and (b) deliver such deeds of future interest, assignments of leasehold interests, or other documents or instruments as are necessary to facilitate or effect such sales of the Properties prior to December 31, 2013 as the Managing General Partner shall otherwise deem desirable. The costs incurred arising from the recordation of any of the documents described in the 2003 Agreement shall be borne by NPAEP. The Managing General Partner believes that the result of the forgoing actions taken pursuant to the 2003 Agreement will preserve all rights of the Limited Partners under the Restructuring Agreement, including their right to share in certain sales proceeds or cash flows prior to maturity of the Wrap Mortgages.

~~(15) Future Interest Agreement~~19

InNATIONAL ~~March~~PROPERTY ~~2003~~ANALYSTS ~~NPAMLP,~~MASTER NPAEP and PVPG, entered into an Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2003 (the “2003 Agreement”), in which NPAEP and PVPG agreed with NPAMLP to modify the terms of Wrap Mortgages held by NPAEP and PVPG. The terms of the 2003 Agreement provided that NPAEP and PVPG: (a) reduce to 4.1% per year the annual interest rate payable on any NPAEP Wrap Note or PVPG Wrap Note that bears a stated annual interest rate in excess of that amount (the reduction in the interest rate was evaluated by NPAMLP in accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, and was determined not to be a substantial modification of terms as defined therein); (b) remove certain of the properties secured by the NPAEP and PVPG Wrap Mortgages from the burden of the cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions currently contemplated by the Restructuring Agreement effective as of January 1, 1990 by and among MLPG, NPAMLP, National Property Analysts, Inc. and others; and (c) agree to release the lien of the Wrap Mortgages from the Properties upon a sale of or the assignment of a leasehold estate in any Property prior to the maturity of the applicable Wrap Note. In consideration for the above, NPAMLP will modify the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages to provide that (i) there is an event of default under the applicable NPAEP Wrap Mortgages or PVPG Wrap Mortgages, as the case may be, if a judgment or other lien is entered against the title or lease-holding entity thereby entitling NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, to avail itself of the post-default rights or remedies under the relevant security document; and (ii) for cross-default and cross-collateralization among the Unaudited Partnerships and, separately, among the Audited Partnerships. In addition NPAMLP shall execute and deliver to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, a currently recordable deed of future interest (or assignment of future leasehold interest) sufficient to convey to NPAEP or PVPG, as the case may be, all of NPAMLP’s right, title, interest and estate in and to its fee or leasehold interest in the encumbered properties effective upon the maturity on December 31, 2013 of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages unless the Wrap Mortgages have previously been paid in full.LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

The Managing General Partner believes that the execution and delivery of the 2003 Agreement will have the following effects for NPAMLP: as a result of the reduction in the annual interest rate on the NPAEP Wrap Notes and the PVPG Wrap Notes (i) NPAMLP expects to realize significant reductions in interest that it otherwise would have been obligated to pay during the period between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2013 when these loans mature and (ii) NPAMLP will be able to allocate a ~~greater~~limited ~~portion of its available cash flow to principal repayments. As a result of the faster repayment of principal, the Limited Partners will recognize additional taxable income (or smaller tax losses~~partnership) in each year from 2003 until the maturity of the NPAEP Wrap Mortgages and the PVPG Wrap Mortgages. In addition, the anticipated date of dissolution of NPAMLP will now occur in 2013 rather than 2015. Further, because the reduced interest rate is below the Applicable Federal Rate (“AFR”) prescribed under Section 1274, Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, investors in certain Partnerships recognized non-recurring ordinary income (forgiveness of indebtedness) in 2003. The tax impact of this recognition will depend upon numerous factors related to each investor’s particular tax situation, including his marginal tax rate and his suspended passive losses from prior years.

~~F-19~~Notes to Combined Financial Statements

~~NATIONAL~~December ~~PROPERTY~~31, ~~ANALYSTS~~2011 ~~MASTER~~and ~~LIMITED PARTNERSHIP~~2010

(adollars ~~limited~~in ~~partnership~~thousands)

~~Notes~~(16) toSubsequent ~~Combined Financial Statements~~Event

In March 2012, NPAMLP entered into an agreement with the buyer of the Ardmore, Oklahoma property in settlement of a past due note receivable. The agreement provides that principal payments aggregating $670, plus interest on unpaid principal at 6% per annum, are due NPAMLP in monthly installments from March 2012 through May 2014. The original promissory note was in the amount of $480, for which NPAMLP recorded $240 as an allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2010. NPAMLP has recorded the additional amount due as a note receivable, and ~~2009~~as a result of the obligor’s continued delinquency, a related allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of $190 at December 31, 2011.

~~(dollars in thousands)~~20

The Wrap Mortgages owned by NPAEP are due and payable in substantial “balloon” amounts on December 31, 2013. Assuming no sales of Properties by NPAMLP in the interim period (2010 through 2013) the projected balance due for all of the Wrap Mortgages at December 31, 2013 is expected to approximate $109,000. As described above, in return for the reduction in interest rate and other consideration set forth above, including the satisfaction of the Wrap Mortgages due on December 31, 2013, NPAMLP’s general partner has agreed to deliver deeds of future interest and assignments of leasehold interest, to be recorded currently, effective December 31, 2013, to NPAEP. NPAMLP’s Managing General Partner has determined that it is in the best interests of NPAMLP and its partners to do so. The effect of these deeds and assignments will be to facilitate a transfer of fee and leasehold ownership to the holders of the Wrap Mortgages at maturity (unless the Wrap Mortgages have been previously paid in full). Notwithstanding the foregoing, NPAEP has agreed in the 2003 Agreement to (a) release the liens of the Wrap Mortgages and (b) deliver such deeds of future interest, assignments of leasehold interests, or other documents or instruments as are necessary to facilitate or effect such sales of the Properties prior to December 31, 2013 as the Managing General Partner shall otherwise deem desirable. The costs incurred arising from the recordation of any of the documents described in the 2003 Agreement shall be borne by NPAEP. The Managing General Partner believes that the result of the forgoing actions taken pursuant to the 2003 Agreement will preserve all rights of the Limited Partners under the Restructuring Agreement, including their right to share in certain sales proceeds or cash flows prior to maturity of the Wrap Mortgages.

F-20

Filing Compare · NATIONAL PROPERTY ANALYSTS MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP