UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

INTEGRAL VISION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Michigan	0-12728	38-2191935
(State or other jurisdiction	(Commission	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	File Number)	Identification No.)

49113 Wixom Tech Drive, Wixom, Michigan 48393

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(248) 668-9230

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

R Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

R Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	¨	Smaller reporting company	R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes R No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

35,675,409 shares of common stock as of August 31, 2012.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

¨ Yes ¨ No

INTEGRAL VISION, INC.

FORM 10-Q Report

June 30, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011	4

	Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	5

	Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit (unaudited)	7

	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	8

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)	9

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	30

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.	Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31

Item 6.	Exhibits	31

	Signatures	35

Condensed Balance Sheets

Integral Vision, Inc.

	June 30			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
	(in thousands)
Assets
Current assets
Cash	$	27		$	116
Accounts receivable		95			35
Accounts receivable employees		1			-
Inventories		91			203
Other current assets		58			128
Total current assets		272			482

Property and equipment
Building improvements		4			4
Production and engineering equipment		364			357
Furniture and fixtures		80			80
Computer equipment		204			201
Marketing/demonstration equipment		139			139
		791			781
Less accumulated depreciation		752			743
Net property and equipment		39			38

Other assets - net of accumulated amortization of $1,605,000 for 2012 and $1,597,000 for 2011		35			37
		35			37
Total assets	$	346		$	557

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Current liabilities
Notes payable ($827,534 in default in 2012. See Note C.)	$	828		$	828
Notes payable to related parties and directors ($5,430,170 in default in 2012. See Note C.)		5,729			5,011
Loans payable		11			11
Accounts payable		558			221
Customer deposits		407			1,192
Accrued compensation and related costs		370			355
Accrued interest ($224,224 of interest is due on notes in default in 2012. See Note C.)		369			295
Accrued warrants for interest		24			43
Accrued interest related parties and directors ($1,580,288 of interest is due on notes in default in 2012. See Note C.)		2,780			2,214
Accrued product warranty		85			51
Accrued sales commissions		48			48
Accrued professional services		55			66
Other accrued liabilities		43			54
Deferred revenue		-			53
Total current liabilities		11,307			10,442

Long-term debt
Notes payable		295			295
Notes payable related parties and directors (See Note D)		3,481			3,481
Total liabilities		15,083			14,218

Commitments and contingencies (Note C and H)
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, 400,000 shares authorized; none issued		-			-
Common stock, without par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 35,675,409 shares issued and outstanding (35,675,409 in 2011)		54,024			54,024
Accumulated deficit		(68,761	)		(67,685	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(14,737	)		(13,661	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	346		$	557

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

Integral Vision, Inc.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011

	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Net product sales	$	764		$	34
Costs of sales:
Costs of sales for products		333			47
Depreciation and amortization		5			4
Total costs of sales		338			51
Gross margin		426			(17	)

Other costs and expenses:
Marketing		87			81
General and administrative		304			264
Engineering and development		212			176
Total other costs and expenses		603			521
Operating loss		(177	)		(538	)
Other income		1			-
Troubled debt restructuring gain		-			72
Interest expense		(37	)		(25	)
Interest expense related parties and directors		(296	)		(254	)
Loss from operations before income taxes		(509	)		(745	)
Income taxes		-			-
Net loss	$	(509	)	$	(745	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding of common stock and common stock equivalents, where applicable		35,675			35,675

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

Integral Vision, Inc.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011

	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues:
Net product sales	$	1,557		$	42
Costs of sales:
Costs of sales for products		812			50
Depreciation and amortization		9			8
Total costs of sales		821			58
Gross margin		736			(16	)

Other costs and expenses:
Marketing		169			169
General and administrative		610			533
Engineering and development		406			340
Total other costs and expenses		1,185			1,042
Operating loss		(449	)		(1,058	)
Other income		1			-
Troubled debt restructuring gain		-			72
Interest expense		(70	)		(76	)
Interest expense related parties and directors		(558	)		(536	)
Loss from operations before income taxes		(1,076	)		(1,598	)
Income taxes		-			-
Net loss	$	(1,076	)	$	(1,598	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding of common stock and common stock equivalents, where applicable		35,675			35,675

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited)

Integral Vision, Inc.

	Number of Common Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Preferred Stock		Accumulated Deficit			Total
	(in thousands, except number of common shares outstanding)
Balances at January 1, 2012		35,675,409	$	54,024	$	-	$	(67,685	)	$	(13,661	)
Net loss for the period								(1,076	)	$	(1,076	)
Balances at June 30, 2012		35,675,409	$	54,024	$	-	$	(68,761	)	$	(14,737	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Integral Vision, Inc.

	Six Months Ended June 30
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(1,076	)	$	(1,598	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		9			44
Amortization		8			6
Warrants issued in settlement of interest to related parties		-			2
Troubled debt restructuring gain		-			72
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(60	)		(37	)
Accounts receivable employees		(1	)		(61	)
Inventories		112			(11	)
Other current assets		70			23
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		364			104
Accrued interest		619			535
Customer deposits		(785	)		39
Deferred revenue		(53	)		92
Net cash used in operating activities		(793	)		(790	)

Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities:
Purchase of equipment		(10	)		-
Additional patent expenditures		(5	)		(5	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(15	)		(5	)

Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities:
Proceeds from sale of Class 2 Notes		-			90
Proceeds from sale of Class 2 Notes to related parties		991			674
Payment of Class 2 Notes to related parties		(272	)		-
Proceeds from loans payable officers		-			10
Proceeds from loans payable		-			10
Payments for loans payable officers		-			(10	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		719			774
(Decrease) in cash		(89	)		(21	)
Cash at beginning of period		116			23
Cash at end of period	$	27		$	2

Supplemental cash flows information:
Interest paid	$	4		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

The condensed financial statements in this report have been prepared by Integral Vision, Inc. (the “Company”) without audit, pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 16, 2012.

The condensed financial statements in this report include all adjustments, consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments, that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of results for these interim periods and in order to make the condensed financial statements not misleading.

The results of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2012.

Note A – Nature of Business

Integral Vision, Inc. develops, manufactures, and markets flat panel display inspection systems to ensure product quality in the display manufacturing process. We primarily inspect Microdisplays and small flat panel displays, though the technology used is scalable to allow inspection of full screen displays and components. Our customers and potential customers are primarily large companies with significant investment in the manufacture of displays. Nearly all of our sales originate in the United States, Asia, or Europe. We have a branch office in Taiwan to provide local sales, service and engineering support to our customers in that region. Our products are generally sold as capital goods. Depending on the application, display inspection systems have an indefinite life and are more likely to require replacement due to possible technological obsolescence than from physical wear.

Major Customers

The nature of our product offerings may produce sales to one or a limited number of customers in excess of 10% of total net sales in any one year. It is possible that the specific customers reaching this threshold may change from year to year. Loss of any one of these customers could have a material impact on our results of operations. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, sales to Qualcomm represented 100% of our total net sales for each period, Approximately $95,000 was due from Qualcomm at June 30, 2012.

Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) cost or market. Cost is computed using currently adjusted standards which approximates actual costs on a FIFO basis. We assess the recoverability of all inventory to determine whether adjustments for impairment are required.

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, inventories consisted of the following amounts (there was no obsolescence allowance at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011):

	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	37	$	23
Work in process		54		147
Finished goods		-		33
	$	91	$	203

We periodically perform an analysis of our inventory to determine if its cost exceeds estimated net realizable value. Over the last several years, given the market conditions and the direction of the Company, we discontinued certain product lines and attempted to liquidate the remaining inventory related to those product lines.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated on the basis of cost. Inventory transferred to engineering equipment and/or marketing and demonstration equipment is transferred at historical cost. Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred.

Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets (building improvements: over 5 years or remaining life of lease; production and engineering equipment: over 3 to 10 years; furniture and fixtures: over 5 to 10 years; computer equipment: over 3 to 10 years; and marketing and demonstration equipment: over 3 to 5 years).

Stockholder’s Equity

As of June 30, 2012, we have 90,000,000 authorized shares of common stock of which 35,675,409 shares are issued and outstanding. 23,621,511 shares of common stock are commited to the holders of outstanding warrants, 23,233,132 shares of common stock are commited to the holders of Class 3 Convertible Notes, and 12,648,000 shares of common stock are commited to the holders of stock options. We also have commitments to issue warrants that can be exercised for a combined total of 14,066,503 of our common shares. We have not issued these warrants and will not issue them until the shareholders authorize sufficient shares to cover their potential exercise. Our total commitment for shares of common stock is 109,244,555 shares as of June 30, 2012. Based on the foregoing, we are in default of our commitment to some of the holders of warrants earned against their Class 2 Notes to reserve adequate authorized shares of common stock for our outstanding commitments and would be in default of our commitment to deliver warrants on request if the holders requested their earned but unissued warrants before sufficient shares were authorized. The Board of Directors has authorized proposing a reverse stock split to the shareholders which, if approved, would resolve this issue.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue represents amounts periodically invoiced for sales orders in excess of amounts recognized as revenues. There was no deferred revenue at June 30, 2012 and $53,000 of deferred revenue at December 31, 2011.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments are cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and long-term debt. The recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The recorded values of notes payable and long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition”, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”) “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

We recognize revenue at the time of shipment for product sales where the customer’s acceptance criteria can be demonstrated as met prior to shipment and where title transfers on shipment. We recognize revenue at the time of final acceptance at the customer site when title does not transfer on shipment or if acceptance criteria at the customer site are substantially different than acceptance criteria for shipment. We recognize revenue for product sales with no specific customer acceptance criteria, including spare parts, on shipment. Revenue from service contracts is recognized over the term of the contract. Revenue is reported net of sales commissions which were $34,107 and $0.00 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $56,175 and $1,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities

During the six-month period ending June 30, 2011, we issued approximately $2,000 of warrants in settlement of interest.

Common Stock Options

We account for our share-based compensation plans according to the provisions of ASC Topic 718 “Stock Compensation”. Accordingly, compensation costs attributable to stock options or similar equity instruments granted are measured at the fair value at the grant date, and expensed over the expected vesting period. ASC Topic 718 “Stock Compensation” requires excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.

Contingencies and Litigation

We make an assessment of the probability of an adverse judgment resulting from current and threatened litigation. We accrue the cost of an adverse judgment if, in our estimation, an adverse settlement is probable and management can reasonably estimate the ultimate cost of such litigation. We had no such accruals at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

None of the new accounting pronouncements affect Integral Vision, Inc.

Note C - Long-Term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements

2012 Activity (Values for warrants are determined using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model)

As of January 1, 2012, we had $4,660,806 of outstanding Class 2 Notes and 12,972,790 unissued warrants valued at $42,976. These Class 2 Notes are working capital notes secured by accounts receivable, inventory, and intellectual property and have been issued primarily to certain shareholders that are directors or beneficial owners of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (see Note D – Related Party Transactions). The Notes bear interest at 10%, payable at maturity of the note and earn warrants at the rate of five warrants per year per dollar invested. The warrants have an exercise price ranging from $0.10 to $0.25 per share of our common stock. The holder can elect to forgo warrants and earn an additional 2% interest.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued $529,000 of Class 2 Notes. We also repaid $9,928 of principal and $247 of interest related to that principal. $359,000 of these notes bear interest at the rate of 10% and earn warrants at the rate of five warrants per year per dollar invested and were due March 23, 2012. These Class 2 Notes were not extended and are currently in default because we did not have sufficient operating cash to pay the notes when due. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 per share of our common stock. $170,000 of these notes earn interest at the rate of 12%, were due $100,000 on April 13, 2012 and $70,000 on May 23, 2012, were not extended and are currently in default because we did not have sufficient operating cash to pay the notes when due. We had 13,627,393 accrued warrants that were earned but not issued as of March 31, 2012, valued at $23,251. These warrants are revalued each quarter using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model and changes in value are reflected in interest expense. During the quarter, we also paid $3,000 of interest to Michael Kiely, a related party. (see Note D – Related Party Transactions).

During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we issued $461,970 of Class 2 Notes. We also repaid $262,500 of principal and $365 of interest related to that principal. All of these notes bear interest at the rate of 12%. $203,470 of these Class 2 Notes were due June 30, 2012 and were not extended and are currently in default. $96,000 of these Class 2 Notes were due July 31, 2012 and were not extended and are currently in default because we did not have sufficient operating cash to pay all of the notes when due. (see Note D – Related Party Transactions).

As of January 1, 2012, we had $4,953,633 of outstanding Class 3 Notes. Of these, $3,671,642 bear interest at 8% and $1,281,989 bear interest at 12%, payable January 1st and July 1st of each year. The Notes are secured by our intellectual property and have been issued primarily to certain shareholders that are directors or beneficial owners of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (see Note D – Related Party Transactions). Also, $3,671,642 of the Notes are convertible into the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, and $1,281,989 of the Notes are convertible into the Company’s stock at $0.15 per share. No new Class 3 Notes were issued during the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, all of the Class 3 Notes are in default and are earning default interest which is 4% above the original interest rate.

The Company is in default under the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), because as of June 30, 2012, it failed to make full payment of principal and interest on $1,304,072 of Class 2 Notes and $4,953,632 of Class 3 Notes that were past their maturity dates. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding unpaid interest on the defaulted Class 2 Notes and Class 3 Notes was $254,001 and $1,550,511, respectively.

The Class 2 and Class 3 Notes are secured by the Company’s intellectual property pursuant to a Collateral Assignment of Proprietary Rights and Security Agreement (the “Collateral Assignment”), and the Class 2 Notes are also secured by the Company’s accounts receivable and inventory pursuant to a Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Collateral Assignment and the Security Agreement, the Class 2 and Class 3 Note holders (or the collateral agent acting on their behalf) have the right to foreclose on the collateral covered by such agreements, and exercise any of several remedies provided in such agreements, including taking possession of such collateral and selling such collateral. See Note K – Subsequent Events for recent activity associated with the Class 2 and Class 3 Notes.

As of June 30, 2012, $37,500 of the Class 2 Notes were earning 10% interest and accruing warrants, $385,000 of the Class 2 Notes were earning default interest of 14% and accruing warrants, $919,072 of Class 2 Notes are in default earning interest of 12%, and $4,037,776 of the Class 2 Notes were earning interest at 12% and do not earn warrants.

As of June 30, 2012, $1,304,072 of the Class 2 Notes were past due and in default. $203,470 of Class 2 Notes are due June 30, 2012, $96,000 of Class 2 Notes are due July 31, 2012, and $3,775,806 of Class 2 Notes are due July 1, 2013. See Note K – Subsequent Events for recent activity associated with the maturity of Class 2 Notes.

The Company is in discussions with the note holders about restructuring of current positions to allow for new capital to be raised. Existing note holders are no longer able to fund our current needs. Taking into account the delay we are experienceing in delivering existing and in receiving anticipated orders, we expect that we may need to raise an additional $1,500,000 of operating capital to bridge the gap and then ramp up production and support over the next 12 months. If the anticipated orders do not materialize as expected, we may need to raise up to $2,400,000 to fund operations through the third quarter of 2013. These levels of required capital are beyond the means of existing noteholders and have caused us to seek new investors which will result in a restructuring of current positions. See Note K – Subsequent Events of our financial statements for information on note activity since June 30, 2012.

The following table summarizes Class 2 Note activity for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012:

	Notes Issued for Cash		Class 3 Notes Issued for Class 2 Note Payment		Cash Redemption			Notes Issued for Interest Payment		Class 2 Note Balance		Warrants Issued for Interest

Balance December 31, 2011	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	4,660,806	$	-
Quarter Ended March 31, 2012		529,000		-		(9,928	)		-		519,072		-
Quarter Ended June 30, 2012		461,970		-		(262,500	)		-		199,470		-
Balance June 30, 2012	$	990,970	$	-	$	(272,428	)	$	-	$	5,379,348	$	-

The following table summarizes Class 3 Note activity for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012:

	Notes Issued For Cash		Exchange of Class 2 Note and Related Interest		Cash Redemption		Notes Issued For Interest		Class 3 Note Balance

Balance December 31, 2011	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	4,953,633
Quarter Ended March 31, 2012		-		-		-		-		-
Quarter Ended June 30, 2012		-		-		-		-		-
Balance June 30, 2012	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	4,953,633

A summary of the Company’s debt obligations is as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Short Term Notes Payable:
Class 2 Notes	$	1,603	$	885
Class 3 Notes		4,954		4,954
Net Short Term Notes Payable	$	6,557	$	5,839

Long Term Notes Payable:
Class 2 Notes	$	3,776	$	3,776
Class 3 Notes		-		-
Net Long Term Notes Payable	$	3,776	$	3,776

Total	$	10,333	$	9,615

There are no long-term maturities of debt due in 2011 or 2012. $3,775,806 of long-term debt matures July 1, 2013.

See Note K – Subsequent Events for recent activity associated with Class 2 and Class 3 Notes.

Note D - Related Party Transactions

The portion of debt described in Note C above that has been issued to Directors and to certain shareholders that own more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company is disclosed in the table below.

	Greater than 5% shareholder					Director
	John Hunter		John R. Kiely, III.			Max A. Coon			Total
Outstanding balance as of December 31, 2011
Class 2 Notes	$	1,781,112	$	2,199,695	1	$	125,000	3
Class 3 Notes	$	1,490,167	$	2,541,427	2	$	354,504	4
Total	$	3,271,279	$	4,741,122		$	479,504		$	8,491,905

Outstanding balance as of June 30, 2012
Class 2 Notes	$	1,781,112	$	2,918,236	1	$	125,000	3
Class 3 Notes	$	1,490,167	$	2,541,427	2	$	354,504	4
Total	$	3,271,279	$	5,459,663		$	479,504		$	9,210,446

Amount of principal paid during Period
2012	$	-	$	272,428		$	-
2011	$	-	$	-		$	-

Amount of interest paid during six- month period ending June 30
Cash 2012	$	-	$	3,609	65	$	-		$	3,609
Notes issued in payment of interest 2012	$	-	$	-		$	-
Value of warrants issued 2012	$	-	$	-		$	-
Total 2012	$	-	$	3,609		$	-		$	3,609

Cash 2011	$	-	$	-		$	-
Notes issued in payment of interest 2011	$	-	$	-		$	-
Value of warrants issued 2011	$	-	$	969		$	-
Total 2011	$	-	$	969		$	-		$	969

Accrued interest at June 30
Cash 2012	$	1,170,788	$	1,422,930	6	$	186,140	8
Value of warrants accrued not issued 2012	$	7,494	$	8,498	7	$	2,308
Total 2012	$	1,178,282	$	1,431,428		$	188,448		$	2,798,158

Cash 2011	$	761,935	$	792,280	10	$	122,332	12
Value of warrants accrued not issued 2011	$	12,575	$	10,148	11	$	2,079	13
Total 2011	$	774,510	$	802,428		$	124,411		$	1,701,349

Includes $100,750 of Class 2 Notes held solely by Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III, and $28,250 of Class 2 Notes held by Maria P. Kiely, sister in law of John R. Kiely, III.

Includes $1,190,194 of Class 3 Notes held solely by Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III, and $29,389 of Class 3 Notes held by Maria P. Kiely, sister in law of John R. Kiely, III.

Includes $125,000 Class 2 Notes held by Charlevoix Drive Properties Ltd. of which Max A. Coon is the principal partner.

Includes $158,580 of Class 3 Notes held by Charlevoix Drive Properties, Ltd. of which Max A. Coon is the principal partner and $56,343 of Class 3 Notes held by Max Andrew Coon, grandson of Max A. Coon.

Includes $3,000 of interest paid to Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III.

Includes $439,668 of interest due to Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III, and $20,490 of interest due to Maria Kiely, sister-in-law of John R. Kiely.

Includes $535 of interest associated with accrued and unissued warrants due to Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III, and $176 of interest associated with accrued and unissued warrants due to Maria Kiely, sister-in-law of John R. Kiely, III.

Includes $127,516 of interest due to Charlevoix Drive Properties, Ltd. of which Max A. Coon is the principal partner and $16,859 of imterest due to Max Andrew Coon, grandson of Max A. Coon.

Includes $2,307 of interest associated with accrued and unissued warrants due to Charlevoix Drive Properties, Ltd. of which Max A. Coon is the principal partner.

10)

Includes $257,113 of interest due to Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III, and $13,363 of interest due to Maria Kiely, sister-in-law to John R. Kiely, III.

11)

Includes $898 of interest expense for accrued and unissued warrants for Michael Kiely, brother of John R. Kiely, III, and $295 of interest expense for accrued and unissued warrants for Maria Kiely, sister-in-law of John R. Kiely, III.

12)

Includes $61,757 of interest due to Charlevoix Drive Properties, Ltd. of which Max A. Coon is the principal partner and $9,561 of interest due to Max Andrew Coon, grandson of Max A. Coon.

13)

Includes $2,079 of interest associated with accrued and unissued warrants due to Charlevoix Drive Properties, Ltd. of which Max A. Coon is the principal partner

Total interest expense for the period ended June 30, 2012 was $627,762 of which $527,543 and $30,069 were for greater than 5% shareholders and directors, respectively. Interest expense for the period ended June 30, 2011 was $612,454 of which $504,750 and $31,735 were for greater than 5% shareholders and directors, respectively.

Related Party Transaction Detail

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in January of 2012 and sold Class 2 Notes to a related party to help meet its obligations. On January 25, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $104,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on March 23, 2012, earning interest at 10%, and earning warrants at the rate of five warrants per dollar of outstanding note per year. Per the terms of the note agreement, we agreed to issue warrants for the first 30 days (42,470 warrants) and any additional warrants earned by this note upon shareholder approval of an increase in the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock that is sufficient to accommodate this commitment. Each of the warrants is exercisable for one share of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share through January 25, 2016. Mr. Kiely elected in advance to cease warrant accrual on March 23, 2012 and increase the interest rate to 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after January 26, 2012 for the design, sale or service of display inspection systems.

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in February of 2012 and sold Class 2 Notes to a related party to help meet its obligations. On February 6, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $90,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on March 23, 2012, earning interest at 10%, and earning warrants at the rate of five warrants per dollar of outstanding note per year. Per the terms of the note agreement, we agreed to issue warrants for the first 30 days (36,986 warrants) and any additional warrants earned by this note upon shareholder approval of an increase in the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock that is sufficient to accommodate this commitment. Each of the warrants is exercisable for one share of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share through February 6, 2016. Mr. Kiely elected in advance to cease warrant accrual on March 23, 2012 and increase the interest rate to 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after February 6, 2012 for the design, sale or service of display inspection systems, but is subordinate to the Class 2 Note issued to Mr. Kiely on January 26, 2012.

On February 23, 2012, Mr. Kiely purchased $165,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on May 23, 2012, earning interest at 10%, and earning warrants at the rate of five warrants per dollar of outstanding note per year. Per the terms of the note agreement, we agreed to issue warrants for the first 30 days (67,808 warrants) and any additional warrants earned by this note upon shareholder approval of an increase in the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock that is sufficient to accommodate this commitment. Each of the warrants is exercisable for one share of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share through February 23, 2016. Mr. Kiely elected in advance to cease warrant accrual on May 23, 2012 and increase the interest rate to 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after February 23, 2012 for the design, sale or service of display inspection systems, but is subordinate to the notes issued to Mr. Kiely on January 26, 2012, and February 6, 2012.

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in March of 2012. On March 5, 2012, Mr. Kiely purchased $70,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on May 23, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after March 5, 2012, for the design, sale or service of display inspection systems but is subordinate to the notes issued to Mr. Kiely on January 26, 2012, February 6, 2012, and February 23, 2012.

On March 23, 2012, $849,072 of Class 2 Notes went into default status because we did not have operating cash to pay these Notes. The interest rate on these Notes increased 4% due to the default.

On March 28, 2012, Mr. Kiely elected to cease warrant accrual on the Class 2 Note purchased Februarly 23, 2012 for $165,000. The interest rate for this note was therefore increased to 12% per the terms of the Agreement.

On March 29, 2012, Mr. Kiely purchased $100,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on April 13, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after March 29, 2012, for the design, sale or service of display inspection systems.

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in April of 2012. On April 2, 2012, Mr. Kiely released his interest in approximately $270,000 of specified payments subject to the conditions that Integral Vision repay $100,000 plus interest on receipt of funds for a specific invoice and that the Company pays $5,000 to the Klonoff Company which will be used for certain legal fees. The balance of the funds were used by the Company for general purposes.

On April 24, 2012, Mr. Kiely released his interest in $53,400 of specified payments and purchased $154,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing June 30, 2012, and earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after April 24, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems. The funds were used by the Company for general purposes.

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in May of 2012. On May 4, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $86,970 of Class 2 Notes maturing on June 30, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after May 4, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems.

On May 22, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $125,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on June 30, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after May 22, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems. On May 29, 2012, John R. Kiely, III released his interest in $41,501 of specified payments.

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in June of 2012. On June 8, 2012, John R. Kiely, III released his interest in $208,288 of specified payments subject to the conditions that Integral Vision repay $162,500 of notes and interest. The balance of the specified payment received was used for general corporate purposes. On June 20, 2012, John R. Kiely, III released his interest in $104,144 in specified payments. The funds were used for general corporate purposes.

On June 27, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $96,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on July 31, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after June 27, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems. The funds were used for general corporate purposes.

The Company did not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in July of 2012. On July 26, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $85,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on August 31, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after July 26, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems. The funds were used for general corporate purposes.

For more information on Class 2 and Class 3 notes, see Note C – Long Term Debt and Other Financing.

Note E - Income Taxes

Income Taxes

In accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” we assess our uncertain tax positions for tax years that are still open for examination. Because of our historical significant net operating losses, we have not been subject to income tax since 1995. There were no unrecognized tax benefits during all of the periods presented. We classify all interest and penalties as income tax expense. We did not have any accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2011. We file income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The tax years 2009 through 2011 remain open to examination by taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. As of June 30, 2012, we did not have any tax examinations in process.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before we are able to realize their benefit, or future deductibility is uncertain. All deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance because of our history of losses.

Note F – Loss per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share - loss available to common stockholders
Net loss	$	(509	)	$	(745	)	$	(1,076	)	$	(1,598	)
*there was no effect of dilutive securities, see below

Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share - weighted average shares		35,675			35,675			35,675			35,675
*there was no effect of dilutive securities, see below

Basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)

Warrants and options outstanding were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the inclusion of these instruments would have an anti-dilutive effect. For additional disclosures regarding stock options and warrants, see Note G – Share-Based Compensation.

Note G – Share-Based Compensation

We currently have two active stock option plans: the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan (“2004 Plan”) and the 2008 Integral Vision, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”) (collectively the “Plans”). The purpose of the Plans generally is to retain and attract persons of appropriate education, experience and ability to serve as our employees, to encourage a sense of proprietorship of such persons, and to stimulate an active interest in our development and financial success.

The 2004 Plan is designed to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing a means by which the Company can grant equity-based incentives to eligible employees of the Company or any Subsidiary as well as non-employee directors, consultants, or advisors who are in a position to contribute materially to the Company’s success. The Plan permits the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to grant Incentive Stock Options and Non-Qualified Stock Options. The maximum number of shares cumulatively available is 1,000,000 shares.

The 2008 Plan is designed to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing a means by which the Company can grant equity-based incentives to eligible employees of the Company or any Subsidiary as well as non-employee directors, consultants, or advisors who are in a position to contribute materially to the Company’s success. The Plan permits the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to grant Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Restricted Stock, and Shares. The maximum number of shares cumulatively available is 14,000,000 plus (i) any shares that are forfeited or remain unpurchased or undistributed upon termination or expiration of the awards from the Plan or options from the 2004 Plan and (ii) any shares exchanged as full or partial payment for the exercise price of any award under the 2008 Plan.

On March 24, 2009, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors approved amending and restating the 2008 Integral Vision, Inc. Equity Compensation Plan to provide for an additional 2,500,000 shares for awards under the Plan of which an additional 1,500,000 may be awarded over the two year period beginning March 24, 2009 to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The shareholders approved the amendment and restatement at the annual shareholders meeting held May 20, 2009.

Effective April 19, 2010, and pending shareholder approval, the Board increased the maximum number of cumulative shares available to 14,000,000 plus (i) any shares that are forfeited or remain unpurchased or undistributed upon termination or expiration of the awards from the 2008 Plan or options from the 2004 Plan and (ii) any shares exchanged as full or partial payment for the exercise price of any award under the 2008 Plan. As of June 30, 2012, and assuming shareholder ratification of the Board’s action, no shares remain which can be issued under the 2008 Plan.

The Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Committee determines which eligible employees will receive awards, the timing and manner of the grant of such option awards, the exercise price of the stock options (which may not be less than market value on the date of grant) and the number of shares. We may at any time amend or terminate the Plans, however no amendment that would impair the rights of any participant with respect to outstanding grants can be made without the participant’s prior consent.

On April 2, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved 100,000 incentive stock options, contingent on shareholder approval of the proposed amendment to the 2008 Equity Compensation Plan and the proposed increase in authorized shares, for a new key employee at an exercise price of $0.0168, the closing price of the stock on April 2, 2012. This award was not recorded as compensation expense in 2012. When shareholder approval of the proposed amendment is received the grant will be recorded as compensation expense.

As of June 30, 2012, we had no unrecognized expense related to unvested share options.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. The fair value of all awards is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. The expected life of all awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. The expected life is determined using historical and other information available at the time of grant. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our common stock, and other factors. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures. There was no activity in the second quarters of 2012 or 2011 so the table has been omitted.

A summary of option activity under all Plans for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011 follows:

	2012					2011
	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(number of shares in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1		12,618		$	0.04		6,260	$	0.06
Granted		100			0.02		0		0.00
Exercised		0			0.00		0		0.00
Expired		(70	)		0.02		0		0.00
Outstanding at June 30 ($.04 to $0.24 per share)		12,648		$	0.04		6,260	$	0.06
Exercisable ($.04 to $.30 per share)(1)		12,648		$	0.04		6,160	$	0.06

(1) Includes 9,030,000 and 2,358,000 shares in 2012 and 2011 respectively that require shareholder approval of the modified Plan prior to exercise. See paragraph 5 of Note G – Share Based Compensation above.

A summary of the status of our nonvested shares as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2011, is presented below:

	2012				2011

	Shares		Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Shares			Weighted Average Grant- Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1		0	$	0.00		64,000		$	0.04
Granted		0		0.00		0			0.00
Exchanged		0		0.00		0			0.00
Vested		0		0.00		(64,000	)		0.04
Nonvested at June 30		0	$	0.00		0		$	0.00

There was no share-based compensation expense for the three-months and six-months periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 related to share-based awards under ASC Topic 718 “Stock Compensation”.

Additional information regarding the range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining life of options outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

				2012						2011
Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Life		Number Exercisable		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Life		Number Exercisable
		(number of shares in thousands)						(number of shares in thousands)
	$0.04 to $0.07(1)		12,348		8.6		12,348		5,776		9.0		5,676
	$0.10 to $0.24		300		3.9		300		484		3.4		484
	Totals		12,648		8.5		12,648		6,260		8.6		6,160

A summary of the outstanding warrants, options, and shares available upon the conversion of Class 3 Notes at June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

			2012								2011
	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Life		Number Exercisable
	(number of shares in thousands)								(number of shares in thousands)
PIPE Warrants	$	0.001		7,000		1.21		7,000	$	0.001		7,000		2.21		7,000
Class 2 Note Warrants	$	0.155		16,622		1.77		16,622	$	0.161		17,244		2.63		17,244
Class 3 Convertible Notes	$	0.213		23,233		-		23,233	$	0.213		23,233		-		23,233
1995 Employee Stock Option Plan	$	0.150		22		0.85		22	$	0.170		184		0.46		184
1999 Employee Stock Option Plan	$	0.170		268		4.03		268	$	0.170		290		4.69		290
2004 Employee Stock Option Plan	$	0.067		1,000		7.76		1,000	$	0.067		1,000		8.77		1,000
2008 Equity Compensation Plan (1)	$	0.031		11,358		8.69		11,358	$	0.052		4,786		8.71		4,686
	$	0.134		59,503		2.44		59,503	$	0.151		53,737		2.10		53,637

The above table does not reflect 14,066,503 accrued warrants that were earned but not issued as of June 30, 2012.

Note H – Taiwan Branch Operations

On January 1, 2012, we opened a branch office in Taiwan to provide local sales, service, and engineering support to our customers in that region. The branch office is staffed by three (3) local engineers and is managed by our Vice President of Marketing and Sales who has moved to Taiwan for the assignment. There were approximately $9,000 of sales recorded for the branch during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. Expenses for the six-month period ending June 30, 2012 were approximately $94,000 of which approximately $10,000 was for marketing, approximately $6,000 was for G&A, approximately $55,000 was for Engineering and approximately $23,000 was for service. The branch has no long term lease commitments.

Note I – Contingencies and Litigation

Product Warranties

We provide standard warranty coverage for most of our products, generally for one year from the date of customer acceptance. We record a liability for estimated warranty claims based on historical claims and other factors. We review these estimates on a regular basis and adjust the warranty reserves as actual experience differs from historical estimates or other information becomes available. This warranty liability primarily includes the anticipated cost of materials, labor and travel, and shipping necessary to repair and service the equipment.

The following table illustrates the changes in our warranty liability for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Amount		Amount
	2012		2011
	(in thousands)
Balance as of January 1	$	51	$	87
Product warranties issued		34		-
Estimate changes for preexisting
warranties		-		(31	)
Payments made		-		(1	)
Balance as of June 30	$	85	$	55

Note J – Going Concern Matters

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the financial statements, we incurred losses in the first six months of 2012 and 2011 of $1,076,000 and $1,598,000, respectively. Additionally, we incurred losses from operations in the years of 2011 and 2010 of $3.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The continuing losses raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue operating as a going concern.

We are currently working with a number of large customers who are using our technologies to evaluate their small flat panel display production or are evaluating our technology for the inspection of LCD displays and components. We expect that additional sales orders will be placed by these customers in the fourth quarter of 2012 and into 2013, provided that markets for these products continue to grow and the customers continue to have interest in our technology-assisted inspection systems. Ultimately, our ability to continue as a going concern will be dependent on these large companies getting their emerging display technology products into high volume production and placing sales orders with us for inspection products to support that production. However, there can be no assurance that we will be succesful in securing sales orders sufficient to continue operating as a going concern.

From November 2006 through August 16, 2012, we have used $10,417,980 of Class 2 and Class 3 Notes to fund operations. $4,953,632 are Class 3 Notes, all of which are in default as of August 16, 2012. $5,464,348 are Class 2 Notes, $1,603,542 of which are in default as of August 16, 2012. We have $445,729 of over 90 days in accounts payable as of June 30, 2012 ($585,282 as of August 31, 2012). We have been unable to sell additional notes under the Agreement since July 26, 2012. We have begun the process of seeking alternative sources of capital to fund our operating expenses and working capital needs. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will raise funding sufficient to continue operating as a going concern. Raising additional capital will likely require a restructuring of the existing debt and equity of the Company. The Company needs to finalize negotiations with the note holders to allow outside cash and find additional cash within the next 30 days or it will have no funds available for operations. The Company has retained an investment banking firm to assist with the debt restructuring and the raising of new capital and interim financing.

As of August 14, 2012, the Company was finalizing ongoing negotiations with Qualcomm who requested that the Company delay shipment of $667,500 of orders it previously made. The Company anticipates that it will be able to retain the down payment on these orders to cover the expense of work already performed, which will mitigate the financial impact of the delay. Final delivery dates for the delayed orders have not been specified. The lack of clarity regarding an ultimate delivery date, and uncertainty regarding new orders from this customer, have partly contributed to the Company’s difficulties in raising additional funding. While the Company still anticipates that additional material orders will be forthcoming from this customer, we do not know if or when such additional material orders will actually be made. We do, however, anticipate receiving smaller orders from such customer over the next several months.

For further information regarding our obligations, see Note C – Long Term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements and Note K – Subsequent Events.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note K – Subsequent Events

On July 1, 2012, we failed to make an interest payment of $1,550,511 on outstanding Class 3 Notes because we did not have sufficient operating cash. All of the Class 3 Notes are presently in default.

On July 1, 2012, we defaulted on an additional $240,790 of Class 2 Note principal and $3,750 of interest. This brings the total of the Class 2 Notes in default to $1,507,542. The amount of interest due on the Class 2 Notes in default at July 1, 2012 was $211,856.

On August 1, 2012, we defaulted on an additional $96,000 of Class 2 Note principal and $1,073 of interest. This brings the total of the Class 2 Notes in default to $1,603,542. The amount of interest due on the Class 2 Notes in default at August 1, 2012 was $228,947.

On July 26, 2012, we sold an additional $85,000 of Class 2 Notes to a related party for use by the Company for general purposes. These Class 2 Notes mature on August 30, 2012, earn interest at 12%, and are secured by substantially all payments received by the Company for the design and sale, or service of display inspection systems except certain engineering and service contracts.

On August 9, 2012, John R. Kiely, III, released his interest in $52,072 of payments received so they could be used by the Company for general purposes.

On August 21, 2012, John R. Kiely, III, released his interest in $26,700 of payments received so they could be used by the Company for general purposes.

On August 27, 2012, John R. Kiely, III, released his interest in $27,280 of payments received so they could be used by the Company for general purposes.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward - Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, risks and uncertainties. Generally, the words “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, “believe” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The information included in this Form 10-Q is as of the filing date with the Securities and Exchange Commission and future events or circumstances could differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included herein. Accordingly, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on such statements.

Overview

Integral Vision, Inc., a Michigan corporation (the “Company”), was incorporated in 1978. We develop, manufacture and market flat panel display inspection systems to ensure product quality in the display manufacturing process. We primarily inspect microdisplays and small flat panel displays, though the technology used is scalable to allow inspection of full screen displays and components. Our products primarily use machine vision to evaluate operating displays for cosmetic and functional defects, but can also provide electrical testing if required for a given application. Our customers and potential customers are primarily large companies with significant investments in the manufacture of displays. Nearly all of our sales originate in the United States, Asia, or Europe. Our products are generally sold as capital goods. Depending on the application, display inspection systems have an indefinite life and are more likely to require replacement due to possible technological obsolescence than from physical wear.

Automated inspection has become a necessity for manufacturers who need to continually improve production efficiency to meet the increasing demand for high quality products. Our automatic inspection systems can inspect parts at a lower cycle time and with greater repeatability than is possible with human inspectors. While we have several large companies as customers, these customers are working with emerging display technologies. Our success will be substantially dependant on these customers getting their emerging display technologies into high volume production.

Products

Our products are generally sold under the trade name SharpEye™. SharpEye™ systems provide Flat Panel Display (“FPD”) inspection for reflective, emissive and transmissive display technologies. SharpEye is designed for the detection of functional and cosmetic defects in Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) displays as well as Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCoS), OLED, Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), 3LCD/High Temperature Poly-Silicon (HTPS), e-paper and other emerging display technologies. These technologies are applied to consumer products including a broad range of hand held devices, e-books, computer monitors, digital still cameras, HDTV, projectors, and video headsets. The core technology of SharpEye™ inspection algorithms is the ability to quantize data to the level of a single display pixel. SharpEye™ can be configured for production inspection or for display evaluation in a laboratory based on the equipment configuration selected.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

Net revenues increased $730,000 (465.7%) to $764,000 in the second quarter of 2012 from $34,000 in the second quarter of 2011. The increase in net revenue was primarily attributable to a increase in revenue from sales of our flat panel display inspection products which resulted from orders booked in the fourth quarter of 2011. Costs of sales increased $287,000 (177.7%) to $338,000 (44.2% of sales) in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $51,000 (150% of sales) in the second quarter of 2011. This was primarily due to a increase in material costs of $287,000 as a result of the higher sales of flat panel display inspection systems. Marketing costs increased $6,000 (8.0%) to $87,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $81,000 in the second quarter of 2011. This increase was primarily attributable to branch operations in Taiwan.

General and administrative (“G&A”) costs increased $40,000 (15.2%) to $304,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $264,000 in the second quarter of 2011. The increase was a result of an increase in professional fees of $33,000 and an increase in employee benefits of $2,000 and Taiwan branch expenses of $5,000.

Engineering and development expenditures increased $36,000 (20.5%) to $212,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $176,000 in the second quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily a result of increases in personnel costs and related benefits.

There was minimal other income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 or for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

The three-month period ended June 30, 2011 included a gain of $72,000 classified as troubled debt restructuring due to the majority of the noteholders waiving the default interest accrued against their notes from October 1, 2010 to May 17, 2011. There was no such gain in the 2012 period.

Interest expense increased $54,000 to $333,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to $279,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to the issuance of additional Class 2 Notes and default interest being charged on defaulted Class 2 and Class 3 Notes.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Net revenues increased $1,515,000 (360.7%) to $1,557,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 from $42,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. The increase in net revenue was primarily attributable to a increase in revenue from sales of our flat panel display inspection products which resulted from orders booked in the fourth quarter of 2011. We also had $53,000 in deferred revenue at December 31, 2011 which could not be recognized because final acceptance had not been received from the customer which has been recognized as revenue in the 2012 fiscal year.

Costs of sales increased $763,000 (76.0%) to $821,000 (52.7% of sales) in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $58,000 (138% of sales) in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. This was primarily due to a increase in material costs of $763,000 as a result of the higher sales of flat panel display inspection systems.

Marketing costs of $169,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 remained the same as the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

G&A costs increased $77,000 (14.4%) to $610,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $533,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 The increase was a result of increases in employee benefits of $7,000, professional fees of $54,000, and Taiwan branch costs of $6,000.

Engineering and development expenditures increased $66,000 (19.4%) to $406,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $340,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to additional staff resulting in increases in personnel costs of $68,000 offset by a decrease in outside services of $2,000.

Other income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 was comparable to the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

The six-month period ended June 30, 2011 included a gain of $72,000 classified as troubled debt restructuring due to the majority of the noteholders waiving the default interest earned on their notes from October 1, 2010 to May 17, 2011. There was no such gain in the 2012 period.

Interest expense increased $16,000 to $628,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $612,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to the issuance of additional Class 2 Notes and the additional interest that resulted from the default on Class 2 and Class 3 Notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash used in operating activities was $793,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $790,000 for the first six months of 2011. Operating cash flow for both periods primarily reflected net losses of $1,076,000 for 2012 and $1,598,000 for 2011 adjusted for non-cash charges and changes in working capital. Working capital changes in the first six months of 2012 primarily reflected an increase in accounts receivable, both trade and employee, as a result of payments not received and loans made to employees, a decrease in inventory as a result of decreases in finished goods and our increased sales, and a decrease in other current assets as a result of timing of expense recognition. We realized an increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities as a result of insufficient cash to make payments. Accrued interest increased as a result of the issuance of additional debt and the default interest rate in effect on the defaulted Class 2 and Class 3 Notes. Customer deposits decreased as a result of sales orders shipped. Deferred revenue decreased as a result of shipped systems that had received final customer acceptance by the end of the period. Working capital changes in the first six months of 2011 primarily reflected an increase in accounts receivable, both trade and employee, as a result of payments not received and loans made to employees, an increase in inventory as a result of increases in finished goods, partially offset by a decrease in other current assets as a result of timing of expense recognition We realized an increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities as a result of insufficient cash to make payments. Accrued interest increased as result of the issuance of additional debt and and the default interest rate in effect on the defaulted Class 2 and Class 3 Notes. Customer deposits increased as a result of sales orders received. Deferred revenue increased as a result of shipped systems that had not received final acceptance by the end of the period.

Our investing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 included an increase in patents of $5,000 and the purchase of equipment of $10,000. Investing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 included an increase in patents of $5,000.

The Company does not have any commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2012.

Financing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 included proceeds of $991,000 from the issuance of Class 2 Notes. We paid Class 2 Notes in the amount of $272,000. Our financing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 included proceeds of $764,000 from the issuance of Class 2 Notes, and proceeds of $10,000 from loans payable. We did not pay any interest on Class 3 Notes during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

As of August 14, 2012, the Company was near completion of negotiations with a significant customer that requested the Company delay shipment of certain material orders. The company anticipates that the negotiations will result in the company being able to retain down payments already made for the orders to cover the expense of work already done. Final delivery dates for the delayed orders have not been specified. While the Company still anticipates that additional material orders will be forthcoming from this customer, we do not know if or when such additional material orders will actually be made. We do, however, anticipate receiving smaller orders from such customer over the next several months.

The Company is in default under the terms of the Fifth Amended and Restated Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), because it failed to make full payment of principal and interest on certain Class 2 and Class 3 Notes on their respective maturity dates. The defaulted Class 2 and Class 3 Notes are accruing interest at their default interest rates, which is equal to their respective interest rates plus an additional 4%. The Class 2 and Class 3 Notes are secured by the Company’s intellectual property pursuant to a Collateral Assignment of Proprietary Rights and Security Agreement (the “Collateral Assignment”), and the Class 2 Notes are also secured by the Company’s accounts receivable and inventory pursuant to a Security Agreement (the “Security Agreement”). Pursuant to the Collateral Assignment and the Security Agreement, the Class 2 and Class 3 Note holders (or the collateral agent acting on their behalf) have the right to foreclose on the collateral covered by such agreements, and exercise any of several remedies provided in such agreements, including taking possession of such collateral and selling such collateral. The Company’s default under the terms of the Agreement may result in the Company’s liquidity decreasing in a material way. In order to remedy any potential decrease in liquidity, if the existing note holders do not continue to purchase new notes to provide additional funding for operations and if we are unable to obtain acceptable terms for curing or waiving the default and obtaining new financing, we may not have sufficient cash to operate. See Note K – Subsequent Events for information on note activity since June 30, 2012. For further discussion regarding our obligations, see Note C – Long Term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements, Note D – Related Party Transactions, Note J – Going Concern Matters, and Note K – Subsequent Events in the notes to condensed financial statements.

Management’s Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

Our condensed financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The accounting policies discussed below are considered by management to be the most important to an understanding of our financial statements, because their application places the most significant demands on management's judgment and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our assumptions and estimates were based on the facts and circumstances known at June 30, 2012; future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. These policies are also described in Note B of the Condensed Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition”, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”) Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates actual cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or market. Inventories are recorded net of allowances for unsalable or obsolete raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. We evaluate on a quarterly basis the status of our inventory to ensure the amount recorded in our financial statements reflects the lower of our cost or the value we expect to receive when we sell the inventory. This estimate is based on several factors, including the condition and salability of our inventory and the forecasted demand for the particular products incorporating these components. Based on current backlog and expected orders, we forecast the upcoming usage of current stock. We record reserves for obsolete and slow-moving parts ranging from 0% for active parts with sufficient forecasted demand up to 100% for excess parts with insufficient demand or obsolete parts. Amounts in work-in-process and finished goods inventory typically relate to firm orders and, therefore, are not subject to obsolescence risk.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets, including property, equipment and intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount of the asset.

Share Based Compensation

We account for our share based compensation plans according to the provisions of ASC 718 “Stock Based Compensation”. Accordingly, compensation costs attributable to stock options or similar equity instruments granted are measured at the fair value at the grant date and expensed over the expected vesting period.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of all awards is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. The expected life of all awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. The expected life is determined using historical and other information available at the time of grant. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our common stock, and other factors. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures.

Contingencies and Litigation

We make an assessment of the probability of an adverse judgment resulting from current and threatened litigation. We accrue the cost of an adverse judgment if, in management’s estimation, an adverse settlement is probable and management can reasonably estimate the ultimate cost of such litigation. We have made no such accruals as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

This Item 3 is not applicable to us as, pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K, a smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have each reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report as required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b). Based on that evaluation, on June 30, 2012, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer each concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s first six months of the fiscal year 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On April 24, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $154,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on June 30, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after April 24, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems.

On May 4, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $86,970 of Class 2 Notes maturing on June 30, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after May 4, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems.

On July 26, 2012, John R. Kiely, III purchased $85,000 of Class 2 Notes maturing on August 31, 2012, earning interest at 12%. This note is secured by substantially all payments received by the Company after July 26, 2012, for the design and sale of display inspection systems.

The above sales are exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

See Note C – Long Term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements, Note J – Going Concern Matters and Note K – Subsequent Events of our condensed financial statements in Part I of this Form 10-Q, which are incorporated by reference into this Item 3, for information on defaulted note and interest payments.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description of Document

3.1		Articles of Incorporation, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3		Certificate of Designation effective April 11, 2005 and amendment to the By-Laws of the Registrant effective March 23, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 4(b) to the registrant’s Form 8-K dated April 14, 2005, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.4		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Michigan on May 27, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on June 9, 2005, SEC File No. 333-125669, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.5		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Michigan on April 19, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 18, 2008, SEC file No. 333-125669, and incoprorated herein by reference).

3.6		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Michigan on May 28, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, SEC file No. 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.7		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Michigan on May 21, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3.7 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, SEC file No. 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1		Form of Fourth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement including Form of Integral Vision, Inc. Class 3 Note (filed as Exhibit 4.8 to registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.2		Securities Purchase Agreement, Effective April 12, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 4.(A) to registrant’s Form 8-K filed April 14, 2005, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3		Form of Consent to Modifications dated November 14, 2006 modifying the terms of the Fourth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement including Form of Integral Vision, Inc. Class 2 Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.9 to registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4		Form of Consent to Modifications dated August 13, 2007 modifying the terms of the Fourth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5		Form of Consent to Modifications dated October 10, 2007 modifying the terms of the Fourth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6		Form of Consent to Modifications dated January 18, 2008 modifying the terms of the Fourth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7		Form of Amended Collateral Assignment of Proprietary Rights dated March 5, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8		Form of Amended Security Agreement dated March 6, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9		Form of Consent to Amend and Replace Agreements dated March 12, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.10		Form of Fifth Amended and Restated Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.11		Waiver and Amendment Agreement, effective September 15, 2008, and the Registration Rights Agreement and common stock Warrants, made a part thereof, among the respective parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K filed September 15, 2008, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.12		Exchange Agreements, effective September 15, 2008, among the respective parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant’s Form 8-K filed September 15, 2008, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.13		Consent to Amend and Replace Agreements dated June 10, 2009 (Form of Consent filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.14		Consent to Amend and Replace Agreements dated June 24, 2009 (Form of Consent filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.15		Consent to Amend and Replace Agreements dated September 16, 2009 (Form of Consent filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.16		Consent to Modifications dated April 19, 2010, modifying the terms of the Fifth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (Form of Consent filed as Exhibit 4.16 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2010, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.17		Amendment Agreement dated April 22, 1010, modifying the terms of certain warrants issued pursuant to the Waiver and Amendment Agreement (Form of Agreement filed as Exhibit 4.17 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2010, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.18		Amendment Agreement dated May 17, 2011, modifying the terms of the Fifth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement.

4.19		Consent to Modifications dated June 18, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.19 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.20		Amendment Agreement dated May 17, 2011, modifying the terms of the Fifth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.21		Form of Consent to Modifications dated November 15, 2011, modifying the terms of the Fifth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.21 to the registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.22		Form of Consent to Modifications dated December 5, 2011, modifying the terms of the Fifth Amended Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (filed as Exhibit 4.22 to the registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1		Integral Vision, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1995, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2		Form of Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement Between the Registrant and its Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, SEC File 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3		Integral Vision, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan (filed as exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4		Integral Vision, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan (filed as exhibit 10.11 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5		Integral Vision, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.6		Amendment and Restatement of Integral Vision, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Schedule 14A filed March 26, 2009, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7		Form of Amendment and Restatement of Integral Vision, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2010, SEC file 000-12728, and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(e) or Rule 15d-14(a).

32.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	INTEGRAL VISION, INC.

Dated: October 1, 2012	By:	/s/ Charles J. Drake
		Charles J. Drake
		Chairman of the Board and
		Chief Executive Officer

Dated: October 1, 2012	By:	/s/ Mark R. Doede
		Mark R. Doede
		President, Chief Operating Officer
		and Chief Financial Officer

INTEGRAL VISION INC 10-Q