SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

Commission file number 1-12312

PLURES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-3880130
(State of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No)

5297 Parkside Drive, Canandaigua, NY 14424

(Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer’s telephone number: (585) 905-0544

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Large accelerated filer

x Smaller reporting company Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

YES ¨ NO x

Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2013: ~~5,638,383 shares of common stock, $.001 par value.~~

5,658,383 shares of common stock, $.001 par value.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:

YES ¨ NO x

PLURES TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ~~INDEX~~

		PAGE
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (Unaudited)		3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)		4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)		5
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		17
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		18
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A	Risk Factors	19
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	19
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	19
Item 6	Exhibits	19
Signature		20
Exhibit 31	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

INDEX

		PAGE
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)		3

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012		3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)		4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)		5

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		18

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		18

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A Risk Factors		20

Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		20

Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures		20

Item 6 Exhibits		20

Signature		21

Exhibit 31 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	2

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Plures Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	561,358	$	149,703
Accounts Receivable, Net		524,959		351,178
Inventories		350,040		259,981
Prepaid and Other Current Assets		383,493		396,674
Total Current Assets		1,819,850		1,157,536

Equipment, Net		3,756,754		3,780,804

Intangible Assets, Net		1,273,785		1,466,961

Other Assets
Restricted Cash		200,000		200,000
Deferred Financing Fees, Net		303,260		28,131
Total Other Assets		503,260		228,131

Total Assets	$	7,353,649	$	6,633,432

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

Current Liabilities
Current Portion of Notes Payable	$	733,737	$	286,191
Accounts Payable		1,151,694		1,383,177
Accrued Expenses		511,410		708,816
Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits		126,616		86,410
Total Current Liabilities		2,523,457		2,464,594

Long-Term Liabilities
Notes Payables, Net of Current Portion		2,220,076		1,601,456
Convertible Debt		3,821,124		13,082
Warrant Liabilities		939,484		111,811
Total Long-Term Liabilities		6,980,684		1,726,349

Total Liabilities		9,504,141		4,190,943

Commitments and Contingencies
Series A Preferred Stock $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 1,375,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		2,750,000		2,750,000

Stockholders' Deficit
Common stock $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized 5,658,383 and 4,786,526 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		5,658		4,787
Additional Paid-in-Capital		5,783,508		5,217,204
Accumulated Deficit		(10,594,617)		(5,608,323)
Total Plures Technologies, Inc, Stockholders' Deficit		(4,805,451)		(386,332)
Non-Controlling Interest		(95,041)		78,821
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(4,900,492)		(307,511)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	7,353,649	$	6,633,432

	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	2,109,978	$	149,703
Accounts Receivable, Net		577,294		351,178
Inventories, Net		270,340		259,981
Prepaid and Other Current Assets		339,881		396,674
Total Current Assets		3,297,493		1,157,536
Equipment, Net		3,681,875		3,780,804
Intangible Assets, Net		1,338,177		1,466,961
Other Assets
Restricted Cash		200,000		200,000
Deferred Financing Fees, Net		345,596		28,131
Total Other Assets		545,596		228,131
Total Assets	$	8,863,141	$	6,633,432
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Current Liabilities
Current Portion of Notes Payable	$	563,208	$	286,191
Accounts Payable		878,977		1,383,177
Accrued Expenses		525,176		708,816
Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits		112,828		86,410
Total Current Liabilities		2,080,189		2,464,594
Long-Term Liabilities
Notes Payables, Net of Current Portion		2,356,315		1,601,456
Convertible Debt		3,688,934		13,082
Warrant Liabilities		1,945,464		111,811
Conversion Liability		1,064,828		-
Total Long-Term Liabilities		9,055,541		1,726,349
Total Liabilities		11,135,730		4,190,943
Commitments and Contingencies
Series A Preferred Stock $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 1,375,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		2,750,000		2,750,000
Stockholders' Deficit
Common Stock $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized 5,638,383 and 4,786,526 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively,		5,638		4,787
Additional Paid-in-Capital		4,082,728		5,217,204
Accumulated Deficit		(9,053,766)		(5,608,323)
Total Plures Technologies, Inc, Stockholders' Deficit		(4,965,400)		(386,332)
Non-Controlling Interest		(57,189)		78,821
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(5,022,589)		(307,511)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	8,863,141	$	6,633,432

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

	3

Plures Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated ~~Statements~~Statement of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	Three months ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2013		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
	September 30 2013		September 30 2012		September 30 2013		September 30 2012
Revenue	$	~~823~~622,~~083~~540	$	1353,~~735,435~~784	$	1,~~288~~911,~~906~~446	$	4,~~535~~889,~~624~~408
								-
Cost of Revenue		1,715,787		1,903,858		5,321,432		6,098,552
Cost of Revenue		1,886,280		1,916,002		3,605,645		4,194,694
Gross Loss		(1,093,247)		(1,550,074)		(3,409,986)		(1,209,144)
Gross (Loss) Profit		(1,063,197)		(180,567)		(2,316,739)		340,930
Operating Expenses:
Selling, General & Administrative		346,152		766,079		834,239		1,213,581
Selling, General and Administrative		496,626		550,376		1,330,864		1,740,166
Research and Development		~~114~~97,~~477~~410		063,100		~~186~~283,~~130~~541		086,890
Operating Loss		(1,523,826)		(946,646)		(3,337,108)		(872,651)
Total Operating Expenses		594,036		613,476		1,614,405		1,827,056
Other (Expense) Income:
Operating Loss		(1,687,283)		(2,163,550)		(5,024,391)		(3,036,200)
Interest Expense		(143,228)		(34,095)		(233,933)		(61,655)
Other Income (Expense):
Change in Fair Value of Liabilities		~~(38~~458,~~757)~~561		-		19477,~~057~~619		(56,131)
Amortization of Debt Financing Expenses		(24,404)		(1,214)		(26,618)		(2,428)
Other (Expense) Income		(22,551)		5,599		(22,552)		54,046
Other Income		-		83,525		-		105,284
Amortization of Debt Financing Expenses		(42,337)		(1,214)		(68,955)		(3,643)
Total Other (Expense) Income, net		(206,389)		48,216		(241,494)		(14,930)
Interest Expense		(328,365)		(34,550)		(562,298)		(39,368)
Net Loss		(1,730,215)		(898,430)		(3,578,602)		(887,581)
Total Other income (Expense), net		65,308		(30,165)		(176,186)		(45,096)
Less: Net Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(54,240)		(31,617)		(133,159)		(32,132)
Net Loss		(1,621,975)		(2,193,715)		(5,200,577)		(3,081,296)
Net Loss attributable to Plures Technologies, Inc.	$	(1,675,975)	$	(866,813)	$	(3,445,443)	$	(855,449)
Less: Net Loss attributable to non-controlling interest		(81,124)		(95,056)		(214,283)		(127,188)
Net Loss Per Share
Net Loss attributable to Plures Technologies, Inc.		(1,540,851)		(2,098,659)		(4,986,294)		(2,954,108)
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.30)	$	(0.19)	$	(0.64)	$	(0.19)
Net Loss Per Share:
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
Basic and Diluted		(0.27)		(0.44)		(0.91)		(0.64)
Basic and Diluted		5,588,398		4,544,293		5,362,656		4,482,270
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic and Diluted		5,651,002		4,779,787		5,456,703		4,581,179

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

	4

Plures Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	Nine months ended
	June 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
	September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(35,~~578~~200,~~602~~577)	$	(~~887~~3,~~581~~081,296)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Stock Compensation Expense		~~226~~335,~~287~~560		~~192~~321,~~050~~858
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs		2668,~~618~~955		-3,643
Discount on Debt		88263,~~120~~104		28,~~428~~610
Accrued interest on Debt		51,234		5,740
Accrued Interest on Debt		114,551		0
Change in Fair Value of Warrant and Bifurcated Conversion Liabilities		(19,057)		56,131
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Warrant and Bifurcated Conversion Liabilities		(477,619)		56,131
Depreciation		~~209~~322,~~619~~034		~~123~~212,~~461~~609
Amortization of Intangibles		~~128~~193,~~784~~175		~~128~~193,~~784~~175
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effects of Acquisition
Investment in Subsidiary		22,551		0
Accounts Receivable		(226,116)		(297,986)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities
Inventories		(10,359)		36,840
Accounts Receivable		(173,781)		95,161
Prepaid Expenses & Other Current Assets		56,793		1,465
Inventories		(90,059)		238,423
Accounts payable		(504,200)		(75,829)
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets		13,182		(35,326)
Accrued expenses		(183,641)		(184,714)
Accounts Payable		(231,483)		278,420
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		26,418		115,945
Accrued Expenses		(197,406)		(165,952)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(3,708,102)		(783,266)
Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits		40,206		73,752
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(4,997,607)		(1,800,792)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of Manufacturing Equipment		(~~110~~297,~~690~~984)		(~~839~~885,~~465~~712)
Net cash used in Investing Activities		(110,690)		(839,465)
Net cash Used in Investing Activities		(297,984)		(885,712)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Issuance of Convertible Debt, Net of Issuance Costs		4,192,~~239~~238		-
Issuance of Common Stock, Net of Issuance Costs		-		992,500
Borrowings on Note Payable, Net of Issuance Costs		1,727,714		603,596
Repayments on Note Payable		(~~140~~212,~~886~~706)		-
Reduction of Payable to Shareholders		-		(2,017)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		5,~~779~~707,~~067~~246		1,594,079
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		1411,~~960,275~~655		(281,~~652~~092,425)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		149,703		1,123,518
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	2561,~~109,978~~358	$	131,~~094,866~~093
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Issuance of Warrants/Common Stock as Finders’ Fees	$	40,890	$	-
Issuance of Warrants/Common Stock as Finders' Fees	$	40,890		-
Non-cash Interest Expense	$	165,972	$	-
Non-Cash Interest Expense	$	446,610		-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

	5

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation, The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Plures Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). The interim consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our results of operations and financial position for the interim periods.

Although the Company believes that the disclosures in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information normally included in the footnotes prepared in accordance with US GAAP has been omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 3130, 2012 filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013.

For a complete summary of our significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 included in Item 8 of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. There have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013.

Liquidity and Management Plans

The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the Company's liquidity was limited to cash on hand and restricted cash of $2761,~~309,979~~358 and as reflected in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements; the Company has an accumulated deficit, has suffered significant net losses, and has negative cash flows from operations, all of which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. During the first ~~six~~nine months of 2013, the Company has received a total of $6,224,999 in debt financing. Current investors and management provided $4,224,999 in convertible debt and a third party provided an additional $2,000,000 in secured debt, gross of issuance costs. The third party has first lien on all Company assets. The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” was issued in July, 2013. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements. Reclassification

Certain accounts in the September 30, 2012 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the September 30, 2013 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” was issued in July 2013. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements.

2. Inventories

Inventories are comprised of the following:

	June 30, 2013		December 31 , 2012
	September 30, 2013		December 31 , 2012
Raw Material	$	~~270~~309,~~340~~357	$	259,981
Work in Process		40,683		-
Total	$	350,040	$	259,981

~~For~~ At ~~three~~September ~~and six months ended June~~ 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no reserves for inventory obsolescence ~~of $0 and $145,190 respectively~~. ~~For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 there were no reserves for obsolescence.~~

	6

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

3. Debt

Convertible Debt

On various dates from October 2012 through March 2013 the Company entered into 2% Secured Convertible Promissory Note agreements (the “Prior Notes”) with certain of its investors and management. Pursuant to the Prior Notes, the Company ~~sold~~issued an aggregate of $2,433,~~333~~331 in principal and issued 833,333 warrants (the “Prior Note Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The Prior Notes ~~were payable in full 54 months from date of issuance, if~~ and ~~to the extent they were not sooner paid or converted. The~~ Prior ~~Notes~~Note ~~accrued~~Warrants ~~simple interest at two percent (2%) per annum. The Prior Notes~~ were ~~guaranteed~~amended ~~jointly~~in ~~and severally by~~ the ~~Company’s~~second ~~subsidiaries~~quarter ~~and secured by all~~ of ~~the~~2013 ~~assets of the Company~~ and byconverted aunder ~~pledge of each subsidiary’s securities, subordinate only to~~ the ~~Massachusetts~~amended ~~Development Financing Agency (“MDFA”) lien~~terms. ~~The~~See ~~Prior~~below ~~Notes were convertible into common stock of the Company at $3.00 and $2.50 per share plus additional shares~~ for ~~any~~further ~~unpaid interest by the holders at any time prior to maturity~~information. Of the total amount of the Prior Notes, $2,100,000 were convertible at $3.00, while $333,333 were convertible at $2.50. The Prior Notes could have been prepaid at any time at the option of the Company.

The Prior ~~Note~~Notes ~~Warrants~~ were ~~exercisable~~payable atin ~~any~~full ~~time~~54 atmonths ~~an exercise price of $.01 per share and expire four (4) years~~ from date of issuance., ~~The~~if ~~fair~~and ~~value~~to of the ~~Prior~~extent ~~Note~~they ~~Warrants~~were ~~was~~not ~~determined~~sooner ~~using~~paid ~~the~~or ~~Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 0~~converted.~~48%~~ The -Prior ~~0.63%,~~Notes ~~dividend~~accrued ~~yield 0.0%,~~simple ~~expected~~interest ~~life~~at oftwo 4percent ~~years, and volatility 40.4~~(2%) -per 44annum.~~9%.~~ The ~~proceeds of the~~ Prior Notes were ~~discounted~~guaranteed ~~for~~jointly ~~the~~and ~~fair~~severally ~~value~~by of the ~~Prior~~Company’s ~~Note~~subsidiaries ~~Warrants~~and ~~($1,199,517)~~secured ~~which~~by ~~was~~all ~~recorded~~of ~~as additional paid-in capital. The warrant discount was being amortized over~~ the ~~life~~assets of the ~~Prior Notes~~Company ~~using~~and ~~the~~by ~~effective~~a ~~interest~~pledge ~~method.~~of ~~For~~each ~~the~~subsidiary’s ~~year ended December 31~~securities, ~~2012,~~subordinate ~~$2,862~~only ~~of the warrant discount was amortized~~ to ~~interest expense. The total fair value allocated to~~ the ~~Prior~~Massachusetts ~~Notes~~Development ~~was~~Financing ~~$1,233,815~~Agency ~~of which $1,143,961 was allocated to a beneficial conversion feature~~ (“~~BCF~~MDFA”) lien. The APrior ~~BCF~~Notes ~~was~~were ~~recorded~~convertible asinto acommon ~~debt~~stock ~~discount~~of ~~when~~ the ~~consideration~~Company ~~allocated~~at to$3.00 ~~the~~and ~~convertible~~$2.50 ~~security,~~per ~~divided~~share byplus ~~the~~additional ~~number of common~~ shares ~~into~~for ~~which~~any ~~the~~unpaid ~~security~~interest ~~converts,~~by ~~was below~~ the ~~fair~~holders ~~value of the common stock~~ at ~~the~~any ~~date~~time ofprior ~~issuance~~to ~~of the convertible instruments~~maturity. Of ~~The BCF was being amortized to interest expense over~~ the ~~life~~total amount of the Prior Notes, ~~using the effective interest method. Amortization of the BCF totaled~~ $2,~~861~~099,998 ~~for~~were ~~the~~convertible ~~year~~at ~~ended December 31, 2012~~$3. ~~Additionally~~00, ~~interest~~while ~~expense of~~ $5333,~~207~~333 ~~was~~were ~~accrued~~convertible toat ~~the~~$2.50. The Prior Notes ~~for~~could ~~the~~have ~~year~~been ~~ended~~prepaid ~~December~~at ~~31,~~any ~~2012.~~time ~~The~~at ~~Company agreed to pay~~ the ~~holders’~~option ~~legal~~of ~~fees in conjunction with~~ the ~~Prior Notes~~Company.

~~For~~The detachable Prior Note Warrants were exercisable at any time at an exercise price of $.01 per share and expire four (4) years from date of issuance. The fair value of the ~~six~~Prior ~~months~~Note ~~ended~~Warrants ~~June~~has 30been determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 0.48% - 0.63%, ~~2013~~dividend yield 0.0%, ~~amortization~~expected life of 4 years, and volatility 40.4% - 44.9%. The proceeds of the ~~BCF~~Prior ~~was~~Notes have been discounted for the fair value of the Prior Note Warrants ($231,~~660~~199,517) which was recorded in additional paid-in capital. AtThe ~~closing~~warrant discount is being amortized over the life of the ~~Amended~~Prior ~~Securities~~Notes ~~Purchase~~using ~~Agreement~~the effective interest method. For the year ended December 31, 2012, $2,862 of the warrant discount was amortized to interest expense. The total fair value allocated to the Prior Notes was amounted to $1,233,815 of which $1,143,961 has been allocated to a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF was recorded as ~~defined~~a ~~later~~debt indiscount ~~Note~~as 5)the consideration allocated to the convertible security, divided by the ~~unamortized~~number ~~warrant~~of ~~discount~~common ~~and~~shares into which the security converts, was below the fair value of the common stock at the date of issuance of the convertible instruments. The BCF is being amortized to interest expense over the life of the Prior Notes, using the effective interest method. Amortization of the BCF amounted to $2,~~314~~861 for the year ended December 31,~~084~~ ~~were~~2012. Additionally, ~~written~~interest ~~off~~expense of $5,207 was accrued to ~~Additional~~the ~~Paid~~Prior inNotes ~~Capital~~for asthe ofyear ~~May~~ended 8December 31, ~~2013~~2012.

OnAs ~~April~~noted 4above ~~and~~during ~~May~~the 8,second quarter of 2013 the Company entered into Amended Securities Purchase Agreements with certain of its investors and management for 2% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (“Notes”). Pursuant to the Notes, the Company ~~sold~~ issued an aggregate of $5,633~~,333~~ 331 in principal and issued 3,536,458 warrants (the “Note Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. ~~This~~The $5,658,331 in total principal consists of $3,225,000 of additional ~~Notes~~funding ~~(of which $333,333 was raised from the April 4 transaction)~~ and $2,433,~~333~~331 in Prior Notes entered into during 2012 and during the first quarter of 2013 and amended under this agreement. The Notes are payable in full 54 months from date of issuance, if and to the extent they are not paid sooner or converted. The Notes accrue simple interest at two percent (2%) per annum. The Notes are initially convertible into common stock of the Company at $1.60 per share plus additional shares for any unpaid interest by the holders at any time prior to maturity. If the cash balance of the Company and its subsidiaries is less than $1,000,000 during the term of the Notes, the conversion rate will become $1.00 ~~(On May 8, 2013, the $2,433,333 of Prior Notes theretofore issued were converted under these terms)~~.

The Notes are guaranteed jointly and severally by the Company’s subsidiaries and secured by all of the assets of the Company and by a pledge of each subsidiary’s securities, subordinate to ~~the~~all ~~Hercules~~other ~~Loan and Security Agreement (“Hercules Loan) and the Massachusetts Development Financing Agency (“MDFA”) note payable~~debt. ~~The Notes can be prepaid at any time at the option of the Company.~~

The Note Warrants are exercisable at any time at an exercise price of $.01 per share and expire four (4) years from date of issuance. The proceeds of the Notes have been discounted for the fair value of the Note Warrants ($1,027,770) which was recorded as a warrant liability. The ~~warrant discount is being amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method. The~~ fair value of the warrant, which is required to be measured on a recurring basis, was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate .55%, dividend yield 0.0%, expected life of 3.4-4 years, and volatility 82.5%. The warrant discount is being amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method.

	7

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company evaluated the conversion feature of the Notes and determined that it met the conditions for bifurcation into a separate derivative liability (the “conversion feature”). The Company estimated the fair market value of the derivative liability to be $1,028,517 at inception, which was recorded as a liability and a discount to the Notes. The ~~conversion feature discount is being amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method. The~~ fair value of the conversion feature was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 0.55%, dividend yield 0.0%, expected life of 3.94-4.5 years, and volatility 82.5%. The conversion feature discount is being amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method.

AsAt closing of ~~June~~the ~~30,~~Amended ~~2013~~Securities Purchase Agreement, the ~~Company~~unamortized ~~had~~warrant ~~accrued~~discount ~~interest~~and onBCF originally recorded with the Prior Notes and Note Warrants of $312,~~343. Additionally~~314,084 ~~the~~were ~~Company~~written ~~paid~~off ~~direct~~to ~~financing~~additional ~~costs,~~paid ~~which~~in ~~were~~capital ~~recorded~~on asMay ~~deferred~~8, ~~financing~~2013. ~~costs~~For ofthe ~~$18,674~~six ~~which~~months ~~will~~ended beJune ~~amortized~~30, to2013, ~~interest~~amortization ~~expense~~of ~~over~~ the ~~term~~BCF offrom the ~~related~~Prior ~~debt~~Notes was $23,660.

~~The~~On ~~total~~September ~~principal~~15, ~~amounts~~2013 ~~outstanding~~the atCompany’s ~~June~~bank 30balance dropped below the $1,000,000 ~~2013~~threshold required in the agreements resulting in a conversion rate change for the Notes and ~~December~~Note ~~31,~~Warrants ~~2012~~from ~~were~~$1.60 to $1.00. The Notes are now convertible into 5,658,331 shares of common stock and $1the holders of the Note Warrants now have the right to purchases 5,~~433~~658,~~332~~331 ~~respectively~~shares of common stock. All other terms and conditions of the Notes and Note Warrants are unchanged.

The Company reassessed the bifurcated conversion liability and warrant liability that was recorded in May 2013 as a result of this financing to ensure that these derivatives were still properly classified. As a result of the change in conversion rate to a fixed $1.00, it was determined that both of these no longer met the requirements to be accounted for as liabilities, and as such, their fair values as of September 15, 2013 were transferred to equity.

The Company estimated the fair market value of the bifurcated conversion liability at September 15, 2013 to be $805,964. The fair value of the conversion feature at September 15, 2013 was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 1.02%, dividend yield 0.0%, expected life of 3.58-4.14 years, and volatility 99.97%. The Company recorded $258,865 as a change in fair value of liabilities in the consolidated statement of operations for the period from June 30, 2013 through September 15, 2013 and the $805,964 balance was then reclassified to additional paid in capital on September 15, 2013. The initial conversion feature discount calculated at inception of the Notes will continue to be amortized over the original life of the Notes using the effective interest method.

The Company estimated the fair market value of the warrant liability at September 15, 2013 to be $806,283. The fair value of the conversion feature at September 15, 2013 was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 1.02%, dividend yield 0.0%, expected life of 3.08-3.64 years, and volatility 108.3%. The Company recorded a credit to earnings of $258,132 as a change in fair value of liabilities in the consolidated statement of operations for the period from June 30, 2013 through September 15, 2013 and $806,283 was reclassified to additional paid in capital on September 15, 2013. The initial debt discount calculated at inception of the Notes will continue to be amortized over the life of the Notes using the effective interest method.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had accrued interest on the Notes of $65,696. Additionally, the Company had $18,674 of direct financing costs which was recorded as deferred financing costs and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

The total principal amounts outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $5,658,331 and $1,433,332, respectively.

Notes Payable

Massachusetts Development Financing Agency (“MDFA”) Loan

On October 13, 2011, the Company and its subsidiary, AMS Corp. entered into a series of agreements with MDFA related to financing for up to $2,000,000 loan for the purchase of equipment, including a Loan Agreement, a Term Note, a Security Agreement, ~~a Guaranty~~ and a Warrant. The actual principal amount was ~~will be~~ based on equipment purchased during the first six months or such longer period as the lender ~~permits~~permitted. The loan bears interest at the rate of 6.25% per annum. The term of the loan is seven years and is repayable as follows: interest only for the first twelve months, and then constant payments of interest and principal during the following six year period. The loan is repayable in whole or part without penalty. The loan is secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of AMS excluding intellectual property. In connection with this loan, the Company has certain covenants that are required to be maintained that may or may not result in default. The Company, in conjunction with the financing, granted a warrant to MDFA for 59,524 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $2.10. The $80,357 fair value of the warrants was recorded as a warrant liability with a corresponding amount as a discount to the debt. The fair value of the warrant, which is required to be measured on a recurring basis, was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 2.0%, dividend yield 0.0%, expected life of 10 years, and volatility 65%. Additionally, the Company had ~~paid~~$34,000 ~~the~~ of direct financing costs, which ~~were~~was recorded as deferred financing costs and ofwill ~~$34,000, which are being~~ be amortized over the term of the related debt.

As of March 29, 2012 AMS had borrowed the full amount available under the loan. Consistent with the terms of the loan, AMS began making principal payments effective October 1, 2012.

As a result of the debt financing in May 2013, the warrant issued in October 2011 became subject to adjustment in terms of exercise price and number of shares. The exercise price was adjusted to $1.35, which resulted in an increase in the number of shares of common stock of the Company exercisable in the warrant grant to MDFA to 92,472.

As of June 30, 2013 $140,886 had been applied to the principal. Interest expense of $30,027 and $64,533 was paid for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 respectively. Interest expense of $31,255 and $55,915 was paid for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 respectively. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was not considered to be in default.

	8

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

~~The~~As ~~total~~of ~~principal~~March ~~amounts~~29, ~~outstanding~~2012 atAMS ~~June~~had ~~30,~~borrowed ~~2013~~the ~~and~~full ~~December~~amount ~~31,~~available ~~2012~~under ~~were~~the $1loan. Consistent with the terms of the loan,~~813,246~~ ~~and~~AMS $began making principal payments effective October 1,~~954,133~~ ~~respectively~~2012.

As a result of the debt financing in May 2013, the Warrant issued in October 2011 became subject to adjustment in terms of exercise price and number of shares. The exercise price was adjusted from $2.10 to $1.35, which resulted in an increase in the number of shares of common stock of the Company exercisable in the Warrant grant to MDFA from 59,524 to 92,472 shares.

On May 8, 2013, the Company and MDFA executed a “First Amendment to Term Note”. Per the amendment, the Company, prior to the maturity date of the loan must make a one-time lump sum principal payment of $500,000. Until such payment is made, the Company must accrue an additional 3% annual interest on the outstanding principal balance. This accrued interest is to be paid in addition to the lump sum. MDFA also executed a subordination agreement that makes this loan subordinate to the Hercules Loan (discussed further below). MDFA was also granted an additional warrant to purchase 59,524 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $.10 with a term of 10 years. The $15,330 fair value of the warrant was recorded as a warrant liability with a corresponding amount as a discount to the debt. The fair value of the warrant, which is required to be measured on a recurring basis, was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate of 1.81%, dividend yield of 0.0%, expected life of 10 years, and volatility of 66%.

As of September 30, 2013, the company has repaid $212,706 of the principal. Interest expense of $28,575 and $88,476 was paid for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Interest expense of $31,948 and $87,863 was paid for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. As of September 30, 2013, the Company was considered not in compliance with certain covenants as described in Loan Agreements.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had accrued interest on the MDFA Note of $21,590. Additionally, the Company paid direct financing costs which were recorded as deferred financing costs and which will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

The total principal amounts outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $1,741,427 and $ 1,954,133, respectively.

Hercules Technology Growth Capital (“Hercules”) Loan

On May 8, 2013 the Company’s subsidiary, AMS Corp., and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, a Note, a Guaranty and a Warrant. The agreement provides for up to $3,000,000 as financing, with an initial loan amount of $2,000,000 provided upon closing. The debt is guaranteed jointly and severally by the Company’s subsidiaries and secured with a first lien by all of the assets of the Company and by a pledge of each subsidiary’s securities. In connection with ~~this~~the loan, the Company has certain covenants that are required to be maintained that may or may not result in default. The loan bears interest at a rate equal to current prime rate plus 12.75%. At closing the rate was 16.0% per annum (3.25% prime plus 12.75%). The interest rate is broken into two components; cash interest at the rate of 12.0% per annum and payment-in-kind (PIK) interest at 4.0% per annum. The term of the loan is 41 months and is repayable as follows: interest only for the first nine months, and then payments of cash interest and principal for the remaining term. The loan is repayable in whole or part without penalty. PIK interest is accrued over the term of the loan and paid at maturity.

The Company, in conjunction with the financing, granted a ~~warrant~~Warrant to Hercules to purchase Series A Preferred Convertible Stock such that upon conversion of the same, Hercules will own 3.5% of the fully diluted shares on an ongoing basis. The ~~warrant~~ Warrant is exercisable for seven years from date of issuance at an exercise price of $.01 per share. At closing the estimated number of shares granted with the ~~warrant~~Warrant was 431,393. The $845,922 fair value of the Series A Preferred Stock warrants was recorded as a warrant liability with a corresponding amount as a discount to the debt. The fair value of the warrant, which is required to be measured on a recurring basis, was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: estimated fair value of preferred stock of $1.97, risk free rate of 1.2%, dividend yield of 0.0%, expected life of 7 years, and volatility of 70.58%.

Additionally, the Company paid the direct financing costs, which were recorded as deferred financing costs of $107,920. The Company also paid finders fees in the form of cash and warrants to purchase commons stock of $190,270 which were recorded as deferred financing costs, which will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company was not considered to be in default.

The total principal amounts outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $2,000,000 and $0 respectively.

The following is a summary of the maturities of debt outstanding on June 30, 2013:

Year		Debt Outstanding as of 12/31
2013	$	145,086
2014		909,404
2015		1,057,248
2016		1,007,977
2017		6,026,546
2018		325,316
Thereafter		0
Total	$	9,471,577

	9

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company had $107,920 of direct financing costs which was recorded as deferred financing costs. The Company also paid finders fees in the form of cash and warrants for the purchase commons stock of $190,270 which was recorded as deferred financing costs. The deferred financing costs will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

As of September 30, 2013, no amounts have been applied to principal. Interest expense of $61,701 and $77,162 for three and nine months ended was incurred.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had accrued interest on the Notes of $32,473. Additionally, the Company paid direct financing costs, which were recorded as deferred financing costs of $68,373 which will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants as described in the Loan and Security Agreement.

The total principal amount outstanding at September 30, 2013 was $2,000,000.

The following is a summary of the maturities of debt outstanding on September 30, 2013:

Year		Debt Outstanding as of 9/30
2013	$	73,267
2014		909,404
2015		1,057,248
2016		1,007,977
2017		6,026,546
2018		325,316
Thereafter		0
Total	$	9,399,758

4. Income Taxes

The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets as management believes that, after considering all the available objective evidence, both positive and negative, historical and prospective, with greater weight given to historical evidence, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets at ~~June~~September 30, 2013 will not be realized.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the Company had available net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $1618,~~700~~600,000 and $1214,~~300~~200,000, respectively, which may be used to offset future taxable income, subject to the limits discussed below. The transaction for the AMS Inc. acquisition most closely resembles a Type C reorganization under IRC Section 368 (a1C). In a Type C reorganization one corporation acquires nearly all properties of another corporation in exchange solely for all or a part of its own or its controlling parent’s voting stock followed by the acquired corporation’s distribution of all its properties pursuant to the plan of reorganization. This type of transaction qualifies as a non-taxable transaction under IRC Section 368 (a1C). These Net Operating Losses (NOLs) are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state tax authorities. The federal NOLs expire at various dates through 2032. For state purposes, Massachusetts has a five year net operating loss carryover rule for tax years beginning before January 1, 2010. At ~~June~~September 30, 2013, there are $3,700,000 in Massachusetts NOLs set to expire at various dates through 2015. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, Massachusetts has adopted a twenty year NOL carryover rule and has $810,~~400~~200,000 in net operating loss carryforwards that are set to expire at various dates through 2032. The Company has available net operating loss carryforwards for New York State purposes in the amount of $~~202~~300,000 that are set to expire at various dates through 2032.

In addition, $87,000 of Massachusetts investment tax and ~~Research~~research &and ~~Development~~development credits are available to the Company as carryforwards, expiring in various dates through 2015. Of these credits $4,000 of investment tax and $22,000 of R&D are subject to IRC Section 382 as they are considered as part of the pre-change losses and are fully limited. The remaining $6661,000 do not expect to be utilized until the Massachusetts net operating loss carryforward is exhausted and is fully reserved for in the Company’s deferred tax valuation allowance.

5. Stock Compensation

The Company granted 140,000 and 160,000 shares of common stock to directors and officers for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013 respectively. Compensation expense of $42,000 and $92,000 was recognized for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013 respectively,

For three and six months ended June 30, 2012 the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to directors and officers and recognized $31,343 in compensation expense.

For three and six months ended June 30,2013 the Company granted 3,500 shares of common stock as a finder’s fee. Compensation expense of $1,885 was recognized for three month and six months ending June 30, 2013. The Company did not grant any shares as finder’s fee for three and six months ending June 30, 2012.

Total stock based compensation related to restricted shares, board shares, incentive stock option shares and warrants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $129,038 and $226,287, respectively.

	10

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

5. Stock Compensation

In July 2013 the Company issued a warrant to purchase 795,000 shares of common stock to a director. Stock based compensation expense of $68,696 was recognized for the period ending September 30, 2013. The warrant is exercisable for two years from date of issuance at an exercise price of $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrant was determined using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: risk free rate 0.32%, dividend yield 0.0%, expected life of 2 years, and volatility 139.6%.

Total stock based compensation related to restricted shares, board shares, incentive stock option shares and warrants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $109,273 and $335,560, respectively.

Total stock based compensation related to restricted shares, board shares, incentive stock option shares and warrants for three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $129,808 and $321,858, respectively.

6. Fair Value Measurements

The Company has adopted FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”). This topic defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

· Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. · Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. · Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value

· Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

· Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table sets forth Company’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy:

Fair Value measurements at June 30, 2013 :

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money Market Accounts (a)	$	200,000	$	-	$	-	$	200,000
Targets (b)	$	246,351	$	-	$	-	$	246,351
Liabilities
MDFA Warrant Liability 1	$	-	$	-	$	13,350	$	13,350
MDFA Warrant Liability 2	$	-	$	-	$	16,079	$	16,079
Hercules Warrant Liability	$	-	$	-	$	851,620	$	851,620
Convertible Debt Warrant Liability	$	-	$	-	$	1,064,416	$	1,064,416
Conversion Feature	$	-	$	-	$	1,064,828	$	1,064,828

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money Market Accounts (a)	$	239,504	$	-	$	-	$	239,504
Targets (b)	$	315,350	$	-	$	-	$	315,350
Liabilities
MDFA Warrant Liability	$	-	$	-	$	111,811	$	111,811

	11

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Fair Value measurements at December 31, 2012 :

Fair Value measurements at September 30, 2013:
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money Market Accounts (a)	$	200,000	$	-	$	-	$	200,000

Targets (b)	$	275,521	$	-	$	-	$	275,521
Liabilities
MDFA Warrant Liability 1	$	-	$	-	$	5,259	$	5,259

MDFA Warrant Liability 2	$	-	$	-	$	7,238	$	7,238

Hercules Warrant Liability	$	-	$	-	$	926,987	$	926,987

(a) Included in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet

Fair Value measurements at December 31, 2012:
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money Market Accounts (a)	$	239,504	$	-	$	-	$	239,504

Targets (b)	$	315,350	$	-	$	-	$	315,350
Liabilities
MDFA Warrant Liability 1	$	-	$	-	$	111,811	$	111,811

(a) Included in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet (b) Included in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company values the warrant liabilities issued in conjunction with the MDFA Note Payable (Note 53) using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, at each reporting date, which incorporates assumptions about underlying asset value, volatility, expected remaining life and risk free interest rate. The assumptions used at ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were as follows:

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,				December 31,
	2013			~~2012~~	2012
Fair value of underlying stock per share	$	0.3115		$	~~3.00~~$	3.00
Risk-free interest rate		12.8133% -2.2464	%		~~1.48~~	%1.48	%
Expected term		8.2904- 109.60 years			~~8.79 years~~	8.79 years
Dividend yield		0.0	%		~~0.0~~	%0.0	%
Volatility		6671.0021% - 7074.2189	%		~~46.67~~	%46.67	%

The Company values the warrant ~~and derivative liabilities~~ issued in conjunction with the Hercules Note Payable ~~and the Convertible Debt~~ (Note 53) using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, at each reporting date, which incorporates assumptions about underlying asset value, volatility, expected remaining life and risk free interest rate. The assumptions used at ~~June~~September 30, 2013 were as follows:

	Hercules Warrants			Prior Note Warrants			Conversion Feature
Fair value of underlying stock per share	$	1.99		$	.31		$	.31
Risk-free interest rate		1.96	%		1.04	%		1.04	%
Expected term		6.85 years			3.29-3.85 years			3.79-4.35 years
Dividend yield		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Volatility		71.59	%		90.78	%		86.91	%

Marked-to-Market

The change in fair value during the period is as follows:

	Targets		MDFA Warrants 1		MDFA Warrants 2		Hercules Warrants		Convertible Debt Warrants		Conversion Feature		Total Fair Value
Balance 12/31/12	$	315,350	$	111,811	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	427,161
Initial Measure May 2013		-		-		15,330		845,922		1,027,770		1,028,517		2,917,539
Mark to Market		(68,999)		(98,462)		750		5,698		36,646		36,311		(88,056)
Balance 6/30/13	$	246,351	$	13,349	$	16,080	$	851,620	$	1,064,416	$	1,064,828	$	3,256,644

The Company recorded a total net decrease of $88,056 in fair value as a credit to the statement of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

	12

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 the Company recorded an increase of $56,131 in fair value as an expense in the statement of operations.

	September 30, 2013

Fair value of underlying stock per share	$	1.61
Risk-free interest rate		2.02	%
Expected term		6.60 years
Dividend yield		0.00	%
Volatility		80.75	%

Marked-to-Market

The change in fair value of liabilities during the period is as follows:

	MDFA Warrants 1		MDFA Warrants 2		Hercules Warrants		Convertible Debt Warrants		Conversion Feature		Total Fair Value
Balance 12/31/12	$	111,811	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	111,811

Initial Measure May 2013		-		15,330		845,922		1,027,770		1,028,517		2,917,539

Mark to Market		(106,552)		(8,092)		81,065		(221,487)		(222,553)		(477,619)

Reclass to Equity		-		-		-		(806,283)		(805,964)		(1,612,247)

Balance 9/30/13	$	5,259	$	7,238	$	926,987	$	-	$	-	$	939,484

The Company recorded a total net decrease of $477,619 in change in fair value of liabilities as a credit to the statement of operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded an increase of $56,131 in fair value as an expense in the statement of operations.

The Company recorded a total net decrease of $57,236 in change in fair value of targets as a credit to the statement of operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Sensitivity to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair measurement of the warrant liability are the volatility of the underlying stock value and the value of our common stock. Significant increases (decreases) in these unobservable inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

7. Other Comprehensive Income

For three and ~~six~~nine months ending ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no other comprehensive income.

8. Earnings Per Share

The Company reports basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, while diluted EPS additionally includes the dilutive effect of the Company’s outstanding stock options, warrants, and restricted stock computed using the treasury stock method as well as other potentially dilutive securities. For the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012 potentially dilutive securities include:

	June 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Restricted stock		20,000		34,000
Warrants		4,677,074		238,690
Options		458,750		453,750
Escrow shares		-		691,373
Convertible debt		3,536,458		-
Convertible preferred stock		1,677,264		1,677,264
Total potentially dilutive securities		10,369,546		3,095,077

	13

Plures Technologies, Inc

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the shares used in computing diluted net loss per share do not include any of the above securities as the effect is anti-dilutive.

	September 30, 2013		September 30, 2012

Common Stock Warrants		7,034,492		238,690
Convertible debt		5,658,331		-
Convertible preferred stock		1,667,264		1,667,264
Preferred Stock Warrants		742,335		-
Options		458,750		447,500
Escrow shares		-		691,373
Restricted stock		-		20,000

Total potentially dilutive securities		15,561,172		3,064,827

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the shares used in computing diluted net loss per share do not include any of the above securities as the effect is anti-dilutive.

9. Concentrations of Credit Risk

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the Company had sales to three and ~~five~~four customers that accounted for approximately 64 60% and 7556% of all revenue, respectively. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the Company had sales to four customers and one customer that accounted for approximately 7579% and 8174% of all revenue, respectively.

10. Related Party Transactions

The Company utilizes services of a law firm that has an employee who is also an officer and director of the Company. Fees charged by this firm were $~~131~~42,~~240and~~419 and $6847,~~988~~824 for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Fees charged by this firm were $73173,~~908~~659 and $34116,~~028~~812 for the ~~three~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

11. Subsequent Events

InOn ~~July~~November 6, 2013 the Company ~~entered~~received ~~into an agreement with~~ a ~~third~~letter ~~party~~dated ~~consulting~~November ~~firm~~5, ~~for~~2013 afrom ~~six~~counsel ~~month~~to ~~term~~the atlandlord ~~$15,000~~of ~~per~~the ~~month~~office and ~~the~~fabrication ~~firm was~~facility ~~also~~of ~~issued~~the aCompany’s ~~warrant to purchase 795~~subsidiary,~~000~~ ~~shares~~Advanced ofMicroSensors ~~common~~Corp ~~stock~~(AMS), oflocated ~~the~~in ~~Company~~Shrewsbury ~~at $~~MA.80 ~~per~~The ~~share,~~letter toadvised ~~terminate~~that 18AMS ~~months~~was ~~after~~in ~~the~~default ~~termination~~ of ~~the~~its ~~term~~obligations ofunder the ~~consulting~~lease ~~agreement. The~~for ~~warrants~~failure ~~will~~to bepay ~~terminated~~rent ifand ~~the~~other ~~Board~~fees ofas ~~Directors~~they ~~declares~~have ~~breach~~come ofdue ~~contract~~through orNovember if1, ~~the Consultant terminates his services without cause~~2013. The ~~principal~~Company ofhas ~~the~~been ~~firm~~given ~~was~~five ~~also~~(5) ~~elected~~days to ~~the~~cure ~~Board of Directors upon signing of the agreement~~default.

On November 19, 2013 the Company borrowed $75,000 from certain investors. The loan bears interest at 10% per annum and the investors will be issued 112,500 common stock warrants at an exercise price of $.01 per share with a five year term. The loan is repayable on November 25, 2013 with a fee equal to 25% of the loan amount. Additionally, a commitment fee of 75,000 common stock warrants at $.01 per share, with a five year team, was paid for such funds.

	14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this section. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should carefully review the risks described in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the former fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed by the Company and any Current Reports on Form 8-K by the Company.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in this quarterly report.

Overview

On August 10, 2011 the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary merged with and into Plures Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Plures Technologies, Inc.). Plures Holdings, Inc. is the holder of approximately 97% of the outstanding common stock of Advanced MicroSensors Corporation (“AMS”), based in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts. The business of AMS is the design and fabrication of micromechanical electrical systems (MEMS) including, in some instances magnetic components (Spintronics), and its principal activities include the fabrication of magnetic compass sensors and MEMS switches.

In April 2012, the Company formed Magnetic Sense Inc., a Delaware Corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, for the purpose of holding and developing the rights to the Company's magnetic sensor technologies. The Company has not had any operating activity in this subsidiary since inception.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider an accounting policy to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changed in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of the critical accounting policies that we consider to be the most sensitive and that require the most significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2012, under the heading, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies”.

~~Results~~Recently ofIssued ~~Operations~~Accounting ~~for Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012~~Guidance

Results of Operations for Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Summary

For the ~~2013~~three ~~periods~~months ~~compared~~ending toSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~2012~~2013 ~~periods~~compared ~~the~~with ~~Company has significant reductions in revenues due to~~ the ~~curtailment~~same of2012 ~~sales by its largest customer. Although costs of revenues were reduced~~period, the Company’s ~~fixed~~reduced ~~costs~~losses ~~are~~by ~~relatively~~26% ~~high~~from ~~and~~approximately ~~therefore~~$2,193,715 ~~did~~to ~~not fully offset the lost revenue~~$1,621,975. ~~Operating~~ This ~~expenses~~was ~~for~~a ~~the~~result ~~2013~~of ~~periods~~increased ~~declined~~revenues, ~~from~~as ~~the~~well ~~2012 periods~~ as ~~general~~lower ~~and~~overall ~~administrative~~ expenses ~~were~~(detailed ~~reduced~~below). For bynine ~~labor~~months ~~cost~~ending ~~savings~~September as30, ~~well~~2013 asperiod ~~reductions~~losses inwere ~~professional~~approximately ~~fees~~$5,200,577, ~~and~~an ~~stock~~increase ~~compensation. These~~of ~~savings~~$2,119,281 ~~were~~compared ~~offset~~with bythe ~~higher~~same ~~research~~2012 ~~and development expenses~~period. ~~Other~~ ~~expenses~~This ~~have~~is ~~increased~~a ~~significantly~~result ~~due~~of torevenues ~~interest~~for ~~expenses~~the ~~related to~~ 2013 ~~debt~~period ~~financing. As~~declining aby ~~result of this~~$2,977,962 ~~net~~(61%) ~~loss~~while ~~for~~cost ~~the~~of ~~three~~revenues ~~months~~and ~~ended~~operating ~~June~~expense ~~30,~~declined ~~2013~~by ~~was~~ $1989,~~675,975~~771 (24%) as ~~compared~~they todo ~~$866,813~~not ~~for~~decline ~~the~~proportionately ~~same~~since ~~2012~~the ~~period~~majority ~~and~~of ~~the~~costs ~~net~~are ~~loss~~fixed. Additionally, ~~for~~these ~~the~~savings ~~six~~were ~~months~~offset ~~ended~~by ~~June~~increases 30of $131,090 ~~2013~~in ~~was~~other ~~$3,445,443~~expenses asprimarily ~~compared~~due to ~~$855,449~~debt ~~for~~financing ~~the~~transactions ~~same~~in ~~2012~~May ~~period~~2013.

	15

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 were $~~823~~622,~~083~~540, compared with $1353,~~735,435~~784 for the same period in 2012, an increase of 76%. ~~Revenues~~This ~~for~~increase is a result of the ~~six~~Company ~~months~~now ~~ended~~beginning ~~June~~to ~~30,~~replace ~~2013~~revenues ~~were~~lost ~~$1,288,906,~~in ~~compared~~2012 ~~with~~when ~~$4,535,624~~their largest customer curtailed orders in the second quarter of 2012. Revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 were still 61% lower than the comparable 2012~~. This~~ ~~reduction~~period, ~~from~~$1,911,446 ~~prior~~compared ~~periods~~with is$4,889,408, ~~primarily~~as ~~due~~a toresult of the curtailment in sales to the Company’s largest customer ~~which began~~ in ~~the second quarter of~~ 2012.

Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 were approximately $29188,~~700~~071 lower than the same period in 2012. ~~Savings~~as a result of ~~$369,700~~lower ~~were~~expenses ~~realized~~related onto ~~lower~~inventory ~~staffing~~obsolescence offset by higher operational and ~~material~~depreciation costs. Operational ~~due~~costs toincreased ~~lower~~in ~~revenue~~the ~~(30%~~2013 ~~reduction~~ period toas revenues for the period), ~~offset~~increase by ~~2013~~76% ~~reserves~~over ~~for~~the ~~obsolescence~~2012 period, ~~fair~~depreciate ~~value~~increased ~~changes,~~as ~~and~~a anresult ~~elimination~~ of aequipment ~~warranty~~installations ~~reserve~~during 2012. For ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ending ~~June 30,~~ 2013 ~~compared~~expenses toare ~~six~~approximately ~~months ended 2012~~$777,120 ~~cost~~less ofthan ~~revenues~~the ~~declined~~same byperiod ~~$589,000~~in 2012. ~~Savings~~ onOperational savings ~~operational costs~~ of $1933,~~078,600~~200 were arealized ~~result~~on oflower staffing ~~reductions~~ and ~~lower~~ material ~~spending~~costs asdue ~~revenues~~to ~~declined~~lower byrevenue ~~over 70~~(61% ~~from~~reduction ~~the~~period ~~2012~~to period.), ~~Overall~~offset ~~cost~~by of2013 ~~revenues~~reserves ~~did~~for ~~not~~obsolescence, ~~decline~~fair ~~proportionately~~value ~~since~~changes, ~~the~~and ~~majority~~an elimination of ~~the~~a ~~costs~~warranty ~~are fixed~~reserve.

$ in thousands	Three months ending ~~June~~Sept 30						~~Six~~Nine months ending ~~June~~Sept 30
	2013		2012		Change		2013		2012		Change
Operational Costs	$	1,~~546~~581.56	$	1,~~916~~446.19	$	~~(369~~134.7)6	$	34,~~129~~718.2	$	45,~~207~~649.80	$	(~~1,078~~930.67)	~~Savings on labor and materials due to lower revenue~~
Depreciation and Amortization		~~132~~137.75		98118.79		3418.06		~~259~~397.72		~~183~~302.87		7594.95	~~Increased due to equipment purchases in second half of 2012~~
Inventory Obsolescence		~~145~~3.26		-338.1		~~145~~(334.25)		~~145~~148.28		-343.7		~~145~~(195.20)	~~Reserve for risk of obsolescence~~
FV Change in Target Material		59.9		-		59.9		69.0		-		69.0	Expense due to reduction in market price of metals
Fair Value of Target Material		(6.8)		-		(6.8)		57.2		-		57.2
Warranty for Product Returns		-		~~(98.8)~~-		~~98.8~~-		-		(196.9)		196.9	~~Elimination of reserve in 2012~~
Total Cost of Revenues	$	1,~~886~~715.38	$	1,~~916~~903.09	$	(29188.71)	$	35,~~605~~321.64	$	46,~~194~~098.76	$	(~~589~~777.01)

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 were reduced by approximately $~~305~~19,500 and $~~193~~212,~~200~~700, respectively, as compared to the 2012 periods. ~~The~~ General ~~majority~~and ofadministrative ~~the~~savings ~~reductions~~ were lower as a result of reduced labor ~~savings~~costs in both AMS and Plures due to lower 2013 staffing, 2012 severance payments and reductions in management salaries. Research ~~These~~and ~~savings~~development ~~were~~expenses ~~offset~~have byincreased ~~increases~~over inthe ~~research~~2012 ~~and~~periods as development ~~expenses~~efforts did not begin until later in 2012.

$ in thousands	Three months ending June 30						Six months ending June 30
	2013		2012		Change		2013		2012		Change
Research and Development	$	114.5	$	-	$	114.5	$	186.1	$	-	$	186.1	Development efforts did not begin until late 2012
General and Admin - AMS		207.7		380.8		(173.0)		410.8		649.0	$	(238.2)	Lower labor on staffing declines and reduction in audit fees
General and Admin - Plures		138.4		385.3		(246.9)		423.4		564.6		(141.2)	Significant reductions in labor costs as management salaries not paid, additional reductions in stock compensation costs and professional fees
Total Operating Expenses	$	460.6	$	766.1	$	(305.5)	$	1,020.4	$	1,213.6	$	(193.2)

	16

$ in thousands	Three months ending Sept 30						Nine months ending Sept 30
	2013		2012		Change		2013		2012		Change

Research and Development	$	97.4	$	63.1	$	34.3	$	283.5	$	86.9	$	196.7

General and Admin - AMS		157.2		213.3		(56.1)		568.0		838.5		(270.5)

General and Admin - Plures		339.4		337.1		2.3		762.8		901.7		(138.9)

Total Operating Expenses	$	594.0	$	613.5	$	(19.5)	$	1,614.4	$	1,827.1	$	(212.7)

Other Income (Expense)

~~Other~~For three months ending September 30, 2013 the Company had approximately $65,300 of other income compared to approximately $30,200 of expense for the ~~three~~same ~~month~~2012 ~~and~~period. This ~~six~~change is a result of a significant decrease in the fair value of derivative liabilities due to changes in the Company’s stock price during the quarter offset by higher interest expenses due to debt financing that was closed in May 2013 as well as accounting for higher debt issuance costs. For nine months ~~ended~~ending ~~June~~September 30, 2013 ~~was~~expenses were approximately $~~206~~131,~~389~~100 ~~and~~higher ~~241,494~~than ~~respectively~~the 2012 period, ~~representing~~again primarily as result of reductions in fair value of derivative liabilities off set by higher interest expenses. The Company has significant increases ~~over~~in interest expense during the ~~same~~2013 periods ofas compared to the 2012 ~~primarily~~periods as a result of ~~increased interest expenses due to~~ debt financing ~~agreements~~completed ~~entered~~in ~~into during~~ the first half of 2013.

$ in thousands	Three months ending ~~June~~Sept 30						~~Six~~Nine months ending ~~June~~Sept 30
	2013		2012		Change		2013		2012		Change
Interest Income (Expense)	$	(143.2)	$	(34.1)	$	(109.1)	$	(233.9)	$	(61.7)	$	(172.2)	Increased as a result of debt financing Q4 2012 - 2013
Change in Fair Value of Liabilities	$	458.6	$	-	$	458.6	$	477.6	$	(56.1)	$	533.7
Change in Fair Value of Liabilities		(38.8)	$	-	$	(38.8)	$	19.1	$	(56.1)	$	75.2	Due to flucuations in FV as well as new liabilities as a result of Q2 2013 debt financing
Other Income (Expense)		(22.6)		5.6		(28.1)		(22.6)		110.2		(132.7)
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs		(2442.43)	$	(1.2)	$	(2341.21)		(2669.60)		(23.46)	$	(2465.23)	~~Related to Q2 2013 debt financing~~
Other Income (Expense)		-		83.5		(83.5)		-		(105.3)		(105.3)	AMS income earned on reclaim of materials
Interest Expense		(328.4)		(34.5)		(293.8)		(562.3)		(95.5)		(466.8)
Total Other Income (Expense)	$	~~(206~~65.4)3	$	48(30.2)	$	~~(254~~95.6)5	$	(~~241~~176.52)	$	(1445.91)	$	(~~226~~131.51)

	17

Liquidity and Financial Resources

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the Company's liquidity was limited to cash on hand and restricted cash of $2761,~~309,979~~358 and as reflected in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements; the Company has an accumulated deficit, has suffered significant net losses and has negative cash flows from operations, which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ~~During the first quarter of 2013, the Company received funding from certain of its investors on a monthly basis while the Company continued to seek to add funding from third parties.~~

Due to shortfalls in revenues the Company must have additional financing to continue operations. Although arrangements have been made, the same have not been consummated as of this date, and if the same are not consummated in the very immediate future, operations will be suspended or terminated.

For ~~On May 8, 2013,~~ the ~~Company~~nine ~~executed~~months ~~agreements~~ended ~~for~~September ~~a total of $5~~30,~~225,000~~ ~~in debt financing with a possible additional $1~~2013,~~000,000~~ innet ~~2014. Current~~cash ~~investors~~used ~~and~~by ~~management~~operations ~~provided~~was $34,~~225~~997,~~000~~607 incompared ~~convertible~~to ~~debt~~net ~~and~~cash aused ~~third~~by ~~party~~operations ~~provided~~of ~~an additional~~ $21,~~000~~800,~~000~~792 infor ~~secured~~the ~~debt.~~same ~~The~~2012 ~~third party has first lien on all Company assets~~period. As aThe ~~result~~cash ofused ~~this~~by ~~financing,~~operations ~~the~~during ~~Company’s subsidiary, AMS Corp., has secured~~ the ~~lease~~period onended September ~~its manufacturing facility to June~~ 30, ~~2014~~2013 ~~and~~was ~~has~~due ~~the~~primarily ~~option~~ to ~~extend~~the ~~for~~net ~~another~~loss ~~2.5~~incurred ~~years~~during ~~beyond~~the ~~that~~nine ~~date. The~~months ended ~~Company is currently seeking an additional $2,000,000 in financing~~ as ~~required~~a byresult of the ~~third~~revenue ~~party~~decline ~~agreement,~~of ~~which~~61% ~~will~~from ~~then provide an additional $1,000,000 in incremental funds. If financing is not obtained, operations could be curtailed in~~ the ~~September~~same –2012 ~~December timeframe~~period.

Cash ~~For~~flow used for investing activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 totaled $297,984 ~~net~~for ~~cash~~equipment ~~used~~for byAMS’s manufacturing operations. For ~~was~~nine ~~$3,708,102~~months ~~compared~~ended toSeptember ~~net~~30, 2012 cash flow used byfor ~~operations~~investing ofwas $~~783~~885,~~266~~712 ~~for~~which ~~the~~was ~~same~~also ~~2012~~used ~~period.~~for ~~The~~equipment ~~cash~~for ~~used~~AMS’s bymanufacturing operations. Cash ~~during~~flow from financing activities for the ~~period~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 was ~~due~~$5,707,246, ~~primarily~~of which $4,192,238 was related to 2% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes and the ~~net~~Hercules ~~loss~~Technology ~~incurred~~Growth ~~during~~Capital ~~the~~Loan. ~~six~~This ~~months~~was ~~end~~offset ~~June~~by 30$212,706 ~~2013~~in asprincipal arepayments ~~result~~on ofAMS’s ~~the~~note ~~revenue~~payable ~~decline~~to ofMass ~~70%~~Development ~~from~~Financing Agency (MDFA). For the same 2012 period, cash flow from financing activities was $1,594,079, of which $992,500 was from the issuance of common stock, $603,596 from borrowings on the MDFA note payable, these were offset by a reduction in payable to shareholders of $2,017.

Cash flow used for investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $110,690 for equipment for AMS’s manufacturing operations. For six months ended June 30, 2012 cash flow used for investing was $839,465 which was also used for equipment for AMS’s manufacturing operations. Cash flow from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $5,779,067, of which $4,192,239 was related to Convertible Debt and the Hercules Loan. This was offset by $140,886 in principal repayments on AMS’s note payable to Mass Development Financing Agency (MDFA). For the same 2012 period cash flow from financing activities was $1,594,079, of which $992,500 was from the issuance of common stock, $603,596 from borrowings on the MDFA note payable, these were offset by a reduction in payable to shareholders of $2,017.

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We believe we are not subject to material foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, as substantially all of our sales and expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar. We do not hold derivative securities and have not entered into contracts embedded with derivative instruments, such as foreign currency and interest rate swaps, options, forwards, futures, collars or warrants, either to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.

Item 4 Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), were effective as of June 30, 2013 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

	18

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

	19

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors described in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013 for the year ended December 31, 2012, except as follows:

Need for ~~Additional~~additional ~~Financing~~financing

Due to ashortfalls ~~shortfall~~ in ~~anticipated~~ revenues at the ~~current time, the~~ Company ~~will~~must ~~need~~have additional financing byto ~~the~~continue ~~end~~operations. ofAlthough arrangements have been made, the ~~third~~same ~~quarter~~have ~~2013~~not orbeen ~~early~~consummated ~~fourth~~as ~~quarter~~of ~~2013~~this date, If ~~financing~~and isif the same are not ~~obtained~~consummated in the very immediate future, operations ~~could~~will be ~~curtailed~~suspended ~~during~~or ~~that timeframe~~terminated.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit 31	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101	Instance Document
Exhibit 101	Schema Document
Exhibit 101	Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101	Labels Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101	Presentation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101	Definition Linkbase Document

Exhibit 31

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

19Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit 101

Instance Document

Exhibit 101

Schema Document

Exhibit 101

Calculation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101

Labels Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101

Presentation Linkbase Document

Exhibit 101

Definition Linkbase Document

	20

SIGNATURE

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 14, 2013	PLURES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Date: November 25, 2013	PLURES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	/s/ David R. Smith
	David R. Smith
	Chief Executive Officer

2021

Filing Compare · Plures Technologies, Inc./DE