UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________to______________

Commission File Number 0-10176

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	22-2306487
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)

30 A Vreeland Rd
Florham Park, New Jersey	07932
(Address of principal executive offices)	(zip code)

(973) 538-1194

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(30 B Vreeland Road, Florham Park, New Jersey 07932)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 818,~~506~~231,~~080~~222 as of ~~August~~February 1117, ~~2014~~2015

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
Consolidated Statements of Operations	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7-20
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21-29
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	29
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures	3029
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings	3130
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors	3130
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30-31
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	31
ITEM 5. Other Information	31
ITEM 6. Exhibits	3231

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,			September 30,
	December 31,			September 30,
	2014			~~2013~~2014
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1965,~~637,448~~956		$	~~636~~958,~~940~~877
Accounts receivable, net		~~777~~299,~~500~~910			7862,~~403~~794
Inventory		802,588			516,190
Retainage receivable		451,721			367,706
Prepaid expenses and other assets		45,219			118,005
Inventory		748,770			691,044
Costs in excess of billings		-			380,630
Prepaid expenses and other assets		160,186			20,800
Total current assets		32,~~262~~626,~~755~~543			12,~~659~~901,~~168~~221
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,~~263~~126,~~813~~796			2,~~482~~179,~~635~~521
Other assets:
Security deposit		20,825			20,825
Total other assets		20,825			20,825
Total assets	$	54,~~547~~774,~~393~~164		$	45,~~162~~101,~~628~~567
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	35,~~286~~032,~~480~~382		$	23,~~179~~751,~~775~~600
Due to related party		~~485~~573,~~677~~982			~~353~~529,~~220~~830
Deposit payable		~~160~~280,000			65155,000
Billings in excesss of costs and estimated earned profits on uncompleted contracts		2,~~265~~993,~~455~~132			-3,688,059
Estimated loss on uncompleted contract		~~166~~237,~~725~~680			83337,~~804~~189
Debt- current portion		9880,~~024~~538			~~114~~89,~~657~~562
Total current liabilities		69,~~462~~197,~~361~~714			28,~~796~~551,~~456~~240
Long term liabilities:
Debt- long term, net of discount		105,~~307~~187,~~793~~525			610,~~399~~869,~~397~~318
Debt- long term- related party, net of discount		71,~~088~~821,~~936~~790			57,~~169~~525,~~665~~184
Derivative liability		~~708~~37,~~851~~435			11659,~~767,504~~016
Total long term liabilities		187,~~105~~046,~~580~~750			2319,~~336~~053,~~566~~518
Total liabilities		2416,~~567~~244,~~941~~464			2627,~~133~~604,~~022~~758
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares 1,000,000; 0 shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized shares 200,000,000 8,506,080 and 8,024,260 issued and outstanding		8,506			8,024
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized shares 200,000,000 18,231,222 and 8,645,023 issued and outstanding		18,231			8,645
Additional paid in capital		6185,~~194~~019,~~119~~795			5961,~~481~~617,~~081~~019
Accumulated deficit		(8096,~~223~~508,~~173~~326	)		(8184,~~459~~128,~~499~~855	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(1911,~~020~~470,~~548~~300	)		(2122,~~970~~503,~~394~~191	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	54,~~547~~774,~~393~~164		$	45,~~162~~101,~~628~~567

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenues:
Revenues:
System sales	$	1,688,112		$	1,040,628
System sales	$	4,838,820		$	564,236			1,501,957		$	275,002
Total revenues		1,688,112			1,040,628
Total revenues		4,838,820			564,236			1,501,957			275,002
Cost of goods sold		1,576,634			1,390,553
Cost of goods sold		6,653,633			423,655			2,742,726			261,371
Gross profit (loss)		111,478			(349,925	)
Gross profit (loss)		(1,814,813	)		140,581			(1,240,769	)		13,631
Expenses:
Expenses:
Sales and marketing		160,091			170,306
Sales and marketing		531,719			799,034			184,572			218,553
General and administrative expenses		1,277,858			821,544
General and administrative expenses		2,683,412			3,339,865			986,569			1,080,432
Arbitration settlement charge		1,372,887			-
Research and development		8414,~~234~~496			247,~~125,657~~797			~~10,109~~			~~500,930~~
Depreciation and amortization		~~219~~63,~~454~~557			~~305~~73,~~451~~249			~~72,788~~			~~106,209~~
Total expenses		32,~~518~~888,~~819~~889			61,~~570~~112,~~007~~896			~~1,254,038~~			~~1,906,124~~
Loss from operations		(52,~~333~~777,~~632~~411	)		(61,~~429~~462,~~426~~821	)		~~(2,494,807~~	)		~~(1,892,493~~	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest income		~~1,032~~126			~~122~~302			~~539~~			~~121~~
Interest expense		(1397,~~505,619~~298	)		(~~930~~474,~~460~~820	)		~~(536,884~~	)		~~(338,523~~	)
Other income		25			107,980			25			52,220
Debt conversion expense		(9,350,726	)		-
Loss on equity investment		-			(404,431	)		-			(137,926	)
Amortization of discount on debt		(475,743	)		(978,167	)
Amortization of discount on convertible debt		(2,969,145	)		(2,392,060	)		(996,136	)		(839,610	)
Gain on fair value of derivative		621,581			1,072,946
Loss on disposal of equipment		(7,789	)		-			(7,789	)		-
Total other income (expenses)		(9,602,060	)		(379,739	)
Gain on fair value of derivative		11,058,653			1,055,315			(10,750	)		161,192
Loss before provision for income taxes		(12,379,471	)		(1,842,560	)
Total other income (expenses)		6,577,157			(2,563,534	)		(1,550,995	)		(1,102,526	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Income/(loss) before provision for income taxes		1,243,525			(8,992,960	)		(4,045,802	)		(2,995,019	)
Net loss	$	(12,379,471	)	$	(1,842,560	)
Provision for income taxes		7,199			7,218			1,503			1,348
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(1.04	)	$	(0.23	)
Net income/(loss)	$	1,236,326		$	(9,000,178	)	$	(4,047,305	)	$	(2,996,367	)
Weighted average number of shares - basic and diluted		11,874,237			8,026,434
Net income/(loss) per common share - basic	$	0.15		$	(1.19	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.39	)
Weighted average number of shares - basic		8,205,682			7,573,416			8,366,986			7,689,773
Net (loss) per common share - diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(1.19	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.39	)
Weighted average number of shares - diluted		13,034,906			7,573,416			8,366,986			7,689,773

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014 AND 2013

(UNAUDITED)

	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income/(loss)	$	1,236,326		$	(9,000,178	)
Net loss	$	(12,379,471	)	$	(1,842,560	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) operations to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss operations to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~219~~63,~~454~~557			~~305~~73,~~451~~249
Grant of options for services		188,069			16,863
Debt conversion expense		9,350,726			-
Issuance of common stock for interest expense		937,901			893,418
Grant of options for services		725,733			-
Loss on disposal of equipment		7,789			-
Issuance of common stock for interest expense		110,513			316,069
(Gain) on fair value of derivative		(11621,~~058,653~~581	)		(1,~~055~~072,~~315~~946	)
Amortization of discount on debt		2475,~~969,145~~743			2978,~~392,060~~167
Loss on equity investment		-			404,431
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable		(770,097	)		13,293
Decrease in accounts receivable		562,884			5,392
Decrease in restricted cash		-			81,671
(Increase) in retainage receivable		(84,015	)		-
Decrease in costs and estimated earned profits in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		~~380,630~~-			~~475~~380,~~654~~630
(Increase) in inventory		(~~286~~57,~~398~~726	)		(501,~~742~~853,057	)
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		72,786			15,814
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets		(139,386	)		(157,084	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,~~106~~280,~~705~~782			~~321~~627,~~560~~322
Increase in due to related party		~~132~~44,~~457~~152			~~132~~44,~~457~~152
Increase in deposit payable		95125,000			8230,~~788~~000
Increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earned profits on uncompleted contracts		2,265,455			3,096
(Decrease)/increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earned profits on uncompleted contracts		(694,927	)		966,396
Increase/(decrease) in estimated loss on uncompleted contract		82,921			(502,629	)
(Decrease)/increase in estimated loss on uncompleted contract		(99,509	)		220,371
NET CASH (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(21,~~420~~337,~~510~~525	)		(51,~~544~~083,~~308~~899	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(810,~~421~~832	)		~~(25,008~~-	)
Additional equity investment		-			(174,236	)
NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(10,832	)		-
NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(8,421	)		(199,244	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of notes payable		(229,~~768~~024	)		(847,~~303~~647	)
Proceeds from notes payable and line of credit		31,~~452~~364,~~207~~460			21,~~000~~452,~~000~~207
Proceeds from private placement- convertible notes		-			3,075,000
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,355,436			1,444,560
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		3,429,439			4,990,697
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		7,079			360,661
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,000,508			(752,855	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - beginning of period		958,877			636,940
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - beginning of period		636,940			2,079,235
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - end of period	$	965,956		$	997,601
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - end of period	$	1,637,448		$	1,326,380
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	5,594		$	143,~~519~~110
Income taxes	$	7,199		$	5,873
Non-cash investing and financing activites:
Issuance of common stock for interest expense	$	~~937~~110,~~901~~513		$	~~893~~316,~~418~~069
Capital lease obligation for machinery and equipment	$	-		$	238,531
Debt conversion expense	$	9,350,726		$	-

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The Company

Our company, Boomerang Systems, Inc, is engaged in the business of marketing, designing, engineering, manufacturing, installing and servicing its RoboticValet® automated parking systems (“APS”), with corporate and sales offices in Florham Park, New Jersey, a demonstration facility in Hamburg, New Jersey, and a research, design, engineering, production and testing center in Logan, Utah.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us,” means Boomerang Systems, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Our fiscal year end is September 30th. We define fiscal year ~~2014~~2015 as the twelve month period ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial ~~statements~~ statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s ~~Annual~~ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and filed with the SEC on December 3029, ~~2013~~2014. There have been no changes in significant accounting policies since September 30, ~~2013~~2014.

At the present time, we believe our working capital together ~~with~~ with the available borrowings under our Loan and Security Agreement (defined below) and the expected cash flow from ongoing projects will be sufficient to support our administrative requirements and existing projects until March ~~2015~~2016. To implement our full business plan, we will require additional funds, and are now seeking to raise these funds through public or private debt or equity offerings, including offerings to our existing security holders. WeIn ~~intend~~December to2014, ~~seek~~we toobtained ~~obtain~~an additional $7,050,000 of commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement to increase the aggregate amount of commitments from $7,850,000 to $1014,~~000~~900,000. ~~In addition, we are seeking to restructure our existing liabilities and debt (see Note 11 – Subsequent Events).~~ There can be no assurance that the capital we require to meet our operating needs will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unsuccessful in raising sufficient capital, we may be required to curtail our operations and could default on our existing indebtedness. The unaudited, condensed financial statements included in this report do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the sales of RoboticValet and rack and rail systems are recognized using the percentage of completion method, whereby revenue and the related gross profit is determined by comparing the actual costs incurred to date for the project to the total estimated project costs at completion.

Project costs generally include all material and shipping costs, our direct labor, subcontractor costs and an allocation of indirect costs related to the direct labor. Changes in the project scope, site conditions, staff performance and delays or problems with the equipment used on the project can result in changes to costs that may or may not be billable to the customer and can result in changes to the project profit.

Estimates for the costs to complete the project are periodically updated by management during the performance of the project. Provisions for changes in estimated costs and losses, if any, on uncompleted projects are made in the period in which such losses are determined.

When the current estimate of total contract costs exceeds the ~~current~~ current estimate of total contract revenues, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is made. Losses are recognized in the period in which they become evident under the percentage-of-completion method. The loss is computed on the basis of the total estimated costs to complete the contract, including the contract costs incurred to date plus the estimated costs to complete. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, we estimated that the gross loss on current contracts would be $13,~~922~~383,~~833~~725. This loss is comprised of of $13,~~756~~146,~~108~~045 recognized through the percentage of completion method and $~~166~~237,~~725~~680 as a provision for the remaining loss on contracts.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

Revenues of $41,~~838~~688,~~820~~112 and $~~564~~1,~~236~~040,628 have been recognized for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, respectively~~, and $1,501,957 and $275,002 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively~~.

The Company may have service contracts in the future after the contract warranty period is expired, which are separate and distinct agreements from project agreements and will be billed according to the terms of the contract.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include ~~the~~ the accounts of Boomerang Systems, Inc. and the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, including Boomerang Sub, Inc., Boomerang USA Corp. and Boomerang MP Holdings, Inc. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares used to calculate basic and diluted income/(loss) per common share for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013 were 811,~~205~~874,~~682~~237 and 78,~~573~~026,~~416~~434, ~~respectively,~~ ~~and~~respectively. The ~~for~~Company’s ~~the~~common ~~three~~stock ~~months~~equivalents, ~~ended~~of ~~June~~outstanding 30options, ~~2014~~warrants and ~~2013~~convertible ~~were 8~~notes,~~366,986~~ have ~~and~~not ~~7,689,773,~~been ~~respectively~~included as to include them would be anti-dilutive. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, there were fully vested options outstanding for the purchase of ~~902~~1,~~010~~737,459 and ~~641~~623,385 common shares, warrants for the purchase of 108,~~880~~262,~~654~~502 and 910,~~893~~400,~~203~~092 common shares, and notes convertible into 4127,~~914,039~~090 and 4,~~668~~836,~~831~~999 common shares, respectively, all of which could potentially dilute future earnings per share.

	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Basic
Net Income (loss)	$	1,236,326		$	(9,000,178	)	$	(4,047,305	)	$	(2,996,367	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		8,205,682			7,573,416			8,366,986			7,689,773
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock	$	0.15		$	(1.19	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.39	)
Assuming Dilution
Net Income (loss)	$	1,236,326		$	(9,000,178	)	$	(4,047,305	)	$	(2,996,367	)
Convertible note interest		937,901			-			-			-
Convertible note discount amortization		2,470,964			-			-			-
Change in fair value of convertible note BCF		(5,421,134	)		-			-			-
Adjusted Net (loss)	$	(775,943	)	$	(9,000,178	)	$	(4,047,305	)	$	(2,996,367	)
Average Shares
Weighted average shares outstanding		8,205,682			7,573,416			8,366,986			7,689,773
Dilutive securities issuable - stock plans		66,978			-			-			-
Dilutive securities issuable - convertible notes		4,762,246			-			-			-
Total weighted average shares outstanding		13,034,906			7,573,416			8,366,986			7,689,773
(Loss) per share of common stock	$	(0.06	)	$	(1.19	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.39	)

The diluted (loss) per share calculations exclude the effect of stock options and warrants when the options’ and warrants’ assumed proceeds exceed the average market price of the common shares during the period. For the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computations were 598,385 and the weighted average number of warrants excluded from the computations were 10,880,654. For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and nine and three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company’s common stock equivalents, of outstanding options, warrants and convertible notes, have not been included as to include them would be anti-dilutive.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE NINE AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Stock-Based Compensation

The analysis and computation was performed based on our adoption of ASC 718-10-25, which requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, we recognized $~~188~~725,~~069~~733 and $160,~~863,~~ respectively, in share-based payments related to the issuance of stock options ~~and $16,590 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively~~. We recognized no expense related to the issuance of warrants during the ~~nine months or~~ three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013.

Derivative liability

The Company accounts for reset provisions in connection with ~~their~~ their issuance of debt, and reset provisions of equity instruments attached to their debt, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Consensus No. 07-5 “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (EITF 07-5”). Under EITF 07-5, instruments which contain full ratchet anti-dilution provisions are no longer considered indexed to a company’s own stock for purposes of determining whether it meets the first part of the scope exception in paragraph 11 (a) of FASB 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, now promulgated in ASC 815~~, “Derivative and Hedging”~~. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. The derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value at the end of each reporting period as long as they are outstanding.

Fair Value Measurements

As defined in ASC Topic 820 – 10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 – 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1:

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2:

Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category includes those derivative instruments that the Company values using observable market data. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace throughout the term of the derivative instruments, can be derived from observable data, or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

Level 3: Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). The Company’s valuation models are primarily industry standard models. Level 3 instruments include derivative warrant instruments. The Company does not have sufficient corroborating evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 1 or Level 2.8

As required by ASC Topic 820 – 10, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The estimated fair value of the derivative liability was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company uses Level 3 inputs to value its derivative liabilities. The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the major classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and reflects gains and losses for the nine months and one year ended June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively, for all financial assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

	June 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities:
Balance of derivative liabilities – beginning of period	$	11,767,504		$	13,069,663
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(11,058,653	)		(1,302,159	)
Balance of derivative liabilities – end of period	$	708,851		$	11,767,504

Level 3:

Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). The Company’s valuation models are primarily industry standard models. Level 3 instruments include derivative warrant instruments. The Company does not have sufficient corroborating evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 1 or Level 2.

~~Commencing~~As ~~with~~required ~~the~~by ~~quarter~~ASC ~~ended~~Topic ~~March~~820 ~~31,~~– ~~2014~~10, ~~the~~financial ~~Company changed~~assets ~~its~~and ~~methodology for measuring the market price of its common stock as it pertains to the Black-Scholes model. The methodology~~liabilities ~~for~~are ~~measuring~~classified ~~the market price of its stock was previously~~ based on the ~~last~~lowest ~~private~~level ~~placement sale~~ of ~~the~~input ~~Company’s~~that ~~securities, due~~is significant to the ~~thinly-traded~~fair ~~nature~~value ofmeasurement. ~~the~~The Company’s ~~Common Stock. The Company determined this measurement was no longer sufficient~~assessment toof ~~determine~~ the ~~fair~~significance ~~value~~ of ~~the Company’s stock. The Company has not sold securities in~~ a ~~private~~particular ~~sale~~input ~~since December 2012. The methodology was changed~~ to ~~a weighted-average of~~ the ~~last~~fair ~~sale~~value ~~price~~measurement onrequires ~~the over-the-counter markets~~judgment, ~~based~~and onmay ~~the~~affect ~~last twenty trading days. If~~ the ~~Company did not change this method of~~ valuation, ~~it would have recognized a gain~~ of ~~approximately $1,511,000 on~~ the fair value of ~~the~~assets ~~derivative~~and ~~liability~~liabilities ~~for~~and ~~the~~their ~~nine~~placement ~~months~~within ~~ended~~the ~~June~~fair ~~30,~~value ~~2014~~hierarchy levels.

The ~~Company~~estimated ~~incurred~~fair value of the derivative liability ~~set~~was ~~forth~~calculated using onthe Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company uses Level 3 inputs to value its derivative liabilities. The following table provides a reconciliation of the ~~June~~beginning and ending balances for the major classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and reflects gains and losses for the three months and one year ended December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, ~~balance~~respectively, ~~sheet~~for inall ~~connection~~financial ~~with~~assets ~~the~~and ~~2011~~liabilities ~~Offering~~categorized ~~(see~~as ~~Note~~Level 7)3.

	December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities:
Balance of derivative liabilities – beginning of period	$	659,016		$	11,767,504
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(621,581	)		(11,108,488	)
Balance of derivative liabilities – end of period	$	37,435		$	659,016

The Company incurred the derivative liability set forth on the December 31, 2014 balance sheet in connection with the 2011 Offering (see Note 7).

Research and Development

Pursuant to ASC 730, Research and Development, research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and Development expense for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013 were $8414,~~234~~496 and $247,~~125~~797,~~657,~~ respectively~~, and $10,109 and $500,930 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively~~.

Advertising

Advertising costs are included in Sales and Marketing and expensed as incurred. Advertising costs amounted to $3020,~~846~~377 and $~~166,929 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $~~7,~~400~~385 ~~and $41,636~~ for the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Use of Estimates

Management of the Company has made estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, warranty expense, income taxes and percentage of completion contracts. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do ~~not~~ not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of probable credit losses inherent in our existing accounts receivable balance. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. We determine this allowance based on known troubled accounts, history and other currently available evidence. ~~There~~The ~~is no~~ allowance for doubtful accounts atas ~~June~~of 30December 31, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013,~~2014 ~~respectively~~was $17,500.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

Retainage Receivable

The Company’s contracts for automated parking systems sometimes require a holdback of a percentage of the contract price as retainage. This holdback is recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as “Retainage receivable.” Retainage is a portion of the total price of a project that is held back by the customer until the project reaches certain milestones specified in the contract terms. Retainage percentages typically range from 0% to 10% and are usually collected anywhere from nine to eighteen months from the inception of the project. Retainage receivable at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 was $451,721 and $367,706, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method. Inventory includes materials, parts, assemblies and work in process. The Company records an inventory reserve for the anticipated loss associated with slow moving, obsolete and/or damaged inventory.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance ~~and~~ and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives which range from three years to fifteen years. Depreciation and amortization for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013 was $~~219~~63,~~454~~557 and $~~305~~73,~~451~~249, respectively~~, and $72,788 and $106,209 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively~~.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE NINE AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Warranty Reserves

The Company provides warranty coverage on its products for a specified time as stipulated in its sales contracts. As revenues for contracts are recognized, the Company will record a warranty reserve for estimated costs in connection with future warranty claims associated with those contracts. The amount of warranty reserve is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty and historical costs to service warranty claims. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the reserves based on these factors and adjusts the reserve accordingly. AsThe Company had no warranty reserve as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013, the warranty reserve was $0 and $12,000, respectively~~2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard setting organizations and various regulatory agencies. Due to the tentative and preliminary nature of those proposed standards, management has not determined whether implementation of such proposed standards would be material to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORY

The components of inventory as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013~~2014 were as follows:

	June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)		September 30, 2013
	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)		September 30, 2014
Parts, materials and assemblies	$	~~502~~343,~~018~~635	$	~~508~~206,~~086~~821
Work in-process		~~300~~405,~~570~~135		8484,~~104~~223
Total Inventory	$	~~802~~748,~~588~~770	$	~~516~~691,~~190~~044

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at ~~June~~ 30December 31, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013~~2014:

	June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2013
Computer equipment	$	235,367		$	235,367
Machinery and equipment		141,004			132,582
Furniture and fixtures		47,999			62,803
Leasehold improvements		62,469			62,469
Leased Equipment		70,133			70,133
Buildings		2,598,470			2,598,470
		3,155,442			3,161,824
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(891,629	)		(679,189	)
	$	2,263,813		$	2,482,635

NOTE 5 –COSTS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS

Information with respect to uncompleted contracts at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 are as follows:

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

Costs in excess of billings:	June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2013
	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2014
Earnings on billings to date	$	-		$	2,298,030
Computer equipment	$	47,999		$	47,999
Less: Billings		-			(1,917,400	)
Machinery and equipment		246,199			235,367
Total costs in excess of billings	$	-		$	380,630
Furniture and fixtures		141,003			141,003
Leasehold improvements		62,470			62,470
Leased Equipment		70,133			70,133
Buildings		2,598,470			2,598,470
		3,166,274			3,155,442
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(1,039,478	)		(975,921	)
	$	2,126,796		$	2,179,521

Billings in excess of costs:	June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2013
Earnings on billings to date	$	7,072,151		$	-
Less: Billings		(9,337,606	)		-
Total (billings in excess of costs)	$	(2,265,455	)	$	-

NOTE 5 – BILLINGS IN EXCESS OF COSTS

Information with respect to uncompleted contracts at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 are as follows:

Billings in excess of costs:	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2014
Earnings on billings to date	$	9,107,109		$	7,583,997
Less: Billings		(12,100,241	)		(11,272,056	)
Total (billings in excess of costs)	$	(2,993,132	)	$	(3,688,059	)

NOTE 6 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013~~2014 consisted of the following:

	June 30, 2014		September 30, 2013
	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)		September 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Accounts payable – trade	$	2,158,194	$	1,958,696
Accounts payable – trade	$	2,005,702	$	1,598,838
Accrued interest		1,186,226		944,147
Accrued interest		698,883		137,888
Accrued payroll		229,245		676,942
Accrued warranty expense		-		12,000
Accrued arbitration settlement charge		1,372,887		-
Accrued payroll		536,858		332,640
Other accrued liabilities		85,830		171,815
Other accrued liabilities		45,037		98,409
Total	$	5,032,382	$	3,751,600
Total	$	3,286,480	$	2,179,775

NOTE 7- DEBT

Current Debt

Effective February 6, 2008, the Company became indebted for an an unsecured loan to a third party. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, the principal balance of this loan was $80,538. The loan is is not collateralized, bears interest at an annual rate of 10% and is due on demand. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, the balance of the loan including accrued interest was $~~117~~123,~~008~~031.

The Company entered into a twenty-four month capital lease secured by equipment with a third party commencing on January 1, 2013. The total principal balance of this lease was $315,000 at an annual rate of 6%. As of June 30, 2014, the principal balance was $17,486 and classified as current on our balance sheet.11

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

The Company entered into a twenty-four month capital lease secured by equipment with a third party commencing on January 1, 2013. The total principal balance of this lease was $315,000 at an annual rate of 6%. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the principal balance was paid down in full.

Long-Term Debt

Private Placement Offering – November/December 2011

In November and December 2011, the Company issued to subscribers 6% convertible promissory notes (“2011 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $11.6 million and warrants (“2011 Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of approximately 2.7 million shares of Common Stock of the Company in three (3) closings of a private placement (the “2011 Offering”). The 2011 Notes are due five years after the respective date of issuance and were initially convertible into Common Stock at $4.25 per share, subject to weighted average adjustment for issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions.

The Company valued the 2011 Warrants and the beneficial conversion features (“BCF”) of the 2011 Notes, and the resulting derivative liability, at $5,309,941 each for the 2011 Warrants and the BCF, for a total of $10,619,882 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This discount is being amortized over the life of the note or until such time as the note is repaid or converted, or upon exercise of the 2011 Warrants. The valuation of the 2011 Warrants, BCF, and the resulting derivative liability, were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0%, ii) expected volatility of 52.7%, iii) risk free interest rate of 0.9%, and iv) expected term of 5 years. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $174,907 of the of debt discount. Following the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below), the remaining principal amount of 2011 Notes was $200,000 and the related discount to the convertible debt was $125,452. The Company amortized $6,273 of the remaining debt discount during the three months ended December 31, 2014.

As of September 30, 2014, the aggregate fair value of the derivative was $646,120. The revaluation of the derivative as of December 31, 2014 resulted in a derivative value of $17,331. The change in fair value of the derivative from September 30, 2014 to December 31, 2014 resulted in a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of $628,789. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to the reduction of the principal amount of the convertible notes as a result of the Exchange Offer. The derivative liability was revalued on December 31, 2014 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 34.83% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.65%, iv) expected term of 1.85 years and v) market price of $2.15.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company issued warrants to the placement agent (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Company issued an aggregate of 109,176 Placement Agent Warrants in November and December 2011 valued at $212,040. The Placement Agent Warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering. The Placement Agent Warrants have similar terms to those issued to the convertible debt holders, including a reset provision included with the warrants if the Company should obtain equity financing at a price per share lower than that of the exercise price of the warrants. The Placement Agent Warrants, similar to the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering, do not meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a derivative liability for the value of the Placement Agent Warrants. The derivative liability valued at $12,896 at September 30, 2014 was revalued at $20,104 at December 31, 2014. The difference in valuation for the three months ended December 31, 2014 was $7,208, accounted for as a loss on the fair value of derivative. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The valuation at December 31, 2014 was valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants granted to the debt holders as of December 31, 2014.

As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the conversion price of the 2011 Notes was adjusted to $3.00.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

The Company valued the 2011 Warrants and the beneficial conversion features (“BCF”) of the 2011 Notes, and the resulting derivative liability, at $5,309,941 each for the 2011 Warrants and the BCF, for a total of $10,619,882 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This discount is being amortized over the life of the note or until such time as the note is repaid or converted, or upon exercise of the 2011 Warrants. The valuation of the 2011 Warrants, BCF, and the resulting derivative liability, were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0%, ii) expected volatility of 52.7%, iii) risk free interest rate of 0.9%, and iv) expected term of 5 years. During the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the Company amortized $1,592,982 of the of debt discount.

As of September 30, 2013, the aggregate fair value of the derivative was $11,537,248. The revaluation of the derivative as of June 30, 2014 resulted in a derivative value of $694,980. The change in fair value of the derivative from September 30, 2013 to June 30, 2014 resulted in a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of $10,842,268. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (see Note 2). The derivative liability was revalued on June 30, 2014 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 35.85% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.62%, iv) expected term of 2.35 years and v) market price of $2.20. If the Company did not change this method of valuation, it would have recognized a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of approximately $1,482,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company issued warrants to the placement agent (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Company issued an aggregate of 109,176 Placement Agent Warrants in November and December 2011 valued at $212,040. The Placement Agent Warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering. The Placement Agent Warrants have similar terms to those issued to the convertible debt holders, including a reset provision included with the warrants if the Company should obtain equity financing at a price per share lower than that of the exercise price of the warrants. The Placement Agent Warrants, similar to the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering, do not meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a derivative liability for the value of the Placement Agent Warrants. The derivative liability valued at $230,256 at September 30, 2013 was revalued at $13,871 at June 30, 2014. The difference in valuation for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 was $216,385, accounted for as a gain on the fair value of derivative. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (see Note 2). The valuation at June 30, 2014 was valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants granted to the debt holders as of June 30, 2014. If the Company did not change this method of valuation, it would have recognized a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of approximately $29,000 for the nine months ended June

30, 2014.

Private Placement Offering – June/July 2012

In June and July 2012, the Company issued to subscribers 6% convertible promissory notes due on June 14, 2017 (“2012 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $6.2 million and warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 1.2 million shares of Common Stock (“2012 Warrants”) in a private placement (the “2012 Offering”).

The 2012 Notes were initially convertible into Common Stock at $5.00 per share, subject to weighted average adjustment for issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions. Additionally, the conversion price may not be adjusted below $0.25.

The Company valued the 2012 Warrants and the BCF at $1,956,517 each for a total of $3,913,034 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the third quarter of fiscal 2012. This discount is being amortized over the life of the 2012 Notes or until such time as the 2012 Notes are repaid or converted, or upon exercise of the 2012 Warrants. The valuation of the 2012 Warrants and BCF were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 53.43% iii) risk free interest rate of 0.9% and expected term of 5 years. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, the Company ~~amortized~~ amortized $~~588~~63,~~868~~322 of the of debt discount. Following the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below), the remaining principal amount of 2012 Notes was $200,000 and the related discount to the convertible debt was $126,424. The Company amortized $6,321 of the remaining debt discount during the three months ended December 31, 2014.

13As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the conversion price of the 2012 Notes was adjusted to $3.31.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE NINE AND THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

Private Placement Offering – December 2012

In December 2012 and March 2013, the Company issued to subscribers 6% convertible notes due on December 28, 2017 (the “December 2012 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $3.1 million and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 615,000 shares of Common Stock (the “December 2012 Warrants”) in a private placement (the “December 2012 Offering”).

The December 2012 Notes were initially convertible into Common Stock at $5.00 per share, subject to full ratchet adjustment for issuances of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions, and subject to weighted average anti-dilution adjustment for issuances of Common Stock as payment of interest on the Notes, the 2012 Notes and the December 2012 Notes. Additionally, the conversion price may not be adjusted below $0.25.

The Company valued the December 2012 Warrants and the BCF at $962,904 each for a total of $1,925,808 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. This discount is being amortized over the life of the December 2012 Notes or until such time as the December 2012 Notes are repaid or converted, or upon exercise of the December 2012 Warrants. The valuation of the December 2012 Warrants and BCF were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 52.92% iii) risk free interest rate of 0.72% and expected term of 5 years. During the ~~nine months~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, the Company amortized $~~289~~32,~~114~~124 of the of debt discount. The entire principal amount of the December 2012 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest on October 31, 2014, was exchanged as part of the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below).

AsExchange a result of the issuance of shares of common stock as payment of interest on the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes, the conversion prices of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes were adjusted to $3.98, $4.64 and $4.68, respectively.Offer

On October 31, 2014, the Company completed an offer to exchange outstanding 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes and 2011 Warrants, 2012 Warrants and December 2012 Warrants listed above (the “Exchange Offer”), for the issuance of common stock at the rate of $2.15 per share in exchange for the entire balance (principal and interest) of the notes and warrants issued with the applicable note. The Company exchanged $20.5 million principal amount of the previously outstanding $20.9 million of convertible notes and 4,859,409 warrants for 9,583,384 shares of common stock in the exchange offer. Following the offer to exchange, $200,000 principal amount 2011 Notes and $200,000 principal amount 2012 Notes remain outstanding, at conversion ratios of $3.00 and $3.31 per share, respectively, and 66,667 2011 Warrants and 60,424 2012 Warrants remain outstanding with an exercise price of $3.00 and $3.31, respectively. Immediately prior to exchanging their notes in the Exchange Offer, holders of a majority of the principal amount of each of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes consented to the Company (i) issuing debt from time to time on terms which may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, in an aggregate amount up to $100,000,000, which debt may be secured or unsecured and senior or subordinated to or pari passu with, the Notes, (ii) entering into transactions with its officers, directors, employees and affiliates on terms approved by a majority of the Company’s independent and disinterested directors from time to time, (iii) declaring and paying dividends and making distributions to its holders of common stock as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time and (iv) purchasing or acquiring shares of the Company’s common stock or other equity securities, including the notes and warrants, on terms as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

The Company accounted for the Exchange Offer as an induced conversion under the criteria established in ASC 470-20-40. In accordance with ASC 470-20-40, the Company recognized an expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued in the Exchange Offer in excess of the fair value of shares issuable at the stated conversion rates of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes. This resulted in a debt conversion expense of $9,350,726 for the three months ended December 31, 2014.

June 2013 Loan and Security Agreement

On June 11, 2013, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Boomerang Sub, Inc., Boomerang USA Corp. and Boomerang MP Holdings Inc. (collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers” and individually, a “Borrower”), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) ~~dated~~ dated as of June 6, 2013 with lenders who became a lender party thereto (together with any party which subsequently becomes a ~~lender~~ lender party, the “Lenders” and, individually, a “Lender”) and the Agent (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement). Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, Lenders committed to fund $4,750,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers. The Loan and Security Agreement ~~contemplates~~ contemplated that the aggregate principal amount of borrowings may be increased to $10,000,000 through commitments from additional Lenders who subsequently become a party to the Loan and Security Agreement.

On July 12, 2013 and August 6, 2013, the Borrowers entered ~~into~~ into Amendments No. 1 (the “Amendment”) and No. 2 (the “2nd Amendment”) to the Loan ~~Agreement~~and Security Agreement (collectively “the Amendments”). Pursuant to the Amendments, the additional Lenders committed to fund an ~~additional~~ additional $3,100,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers, bringing aggregate commitments under the Loan ~~Agreement~~and Security Agreement to $7,850,000.

AsOn ofDecember ~~September 30~~24, ~~2013~~2014, the ~~Company~~Borrowers ~~drew~~entered ~~down~~into anAmendment No. 3 (the “3rd Amendment”). Pursuant to the 3rd Amendment, the maximum aggregate principal amount of ~~$3,033,333~~borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement was increased to $15,000,000. ~~The~~Additionally, ~~Company~~Lenders ~~drew~~and ~~down~~incremental lenders committed to fund an additional $37,~~452~~050,~~207~~000 ~~during~~principal ~~the~~amount ~~nine~~of ~~months~~loans ~~ended~~to ~~June~~the 30Borrowers, ~~2014,~~ bringing ~~the~~aggregate ~~total~~commitments ~~amount of borrowings~~ under the Loan and Security Agreement to $614,~~485~~900,~~540 as of June 30, 2014~~000.

~~The~~As ~~notes bear interest at the rate~~ of ~~15%~~September ~~per~~30, ~~annum~~2014, ~~payable upon maturity. The maturity date of~~ the ~~Notes~~Company isdrew ~~May~~down ~~31,~~an ~~2016,~~aggregate ~~subject to earlier prepayment upon acceleration~~ of ~~the occurrence~~ of$6,485,540 anunder ~~event of default (as defined in~~ the Loan ~~agreement);~~and ~~provided~~Security ~~further~~Agreement. ~~that~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~may~~drew ~~prepay~~down ~~the~~an ~~Notes~~additional ~~at any time without penalty. The Company accrued~~ $~~549~~1,~~506~~314,460 ~~of interest expense~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended December ~~June 30~~31, 2014., ~~Total~~bringing ~~accrued~~the ~~interest related~~total toamount of borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement ~~was~~to $~~656~~7,~~876~~850,000 as of ~~June 30~~December 31, 2014.

~~Pursuant~~The tonotes bear interest at the ~~Loan~~rate ~~Agreement~~of 15% per annum, payable upon maturity. The maturity date of the ~~Borrowers~~Notes ~~assigned~~is May 31, ~~pledged and~~2016, ~~granted~~subject to earlier prepayment upon acceleration of the ~~Lenders~~occurrence aof an ~~security~~event ~~interest~~of default (as defined in ~~substantially~~the ~~all~~Loan ofand ~~their~~Security ~~respective~~Agreement); ~~assets,~~provided ~~including~~further ~~their~~that ~~respective~~the ~~intellectual~~Company may prepay the Notes at ~~property,~~any ~~accounts,~~time ~~receivables,~~without ~~general~~penalty. ~~intangibles,~~The ~~equipment,~~Company ~~inventory~~accrued $281,729 ~~all~~ of interest expense during the ~~proceeds~~three ~~and~~months ~~products~~ended ofDecember ~~the~~31, ~~foregoing~~2014. Total ~~and~~accrued interest related to the ~~Company’s~~Loan ~~equity~~and ~~interests~~Security inAgreement ~~the~~was ~~other~~$1,183,811 ~~Borrowers~~as of December 31, 2014.

AsPursuant ~~partial~~to ~~consideration~~the ~~for~~Loan ~~providing~~and ~~advances~~Security ~~under the Loan~~ Agreement, the ~~Company~~Borrowers ~~agreed~~assigned, pledged toand ~~issue~~granted to ~~each~~the ~~Lender~~Lenders ~~warrants~~a tosecurity ~~purchase~~interest ~~20,000~~in ~~shares~~substantially all of ~~its~~their ~~common~~respective ~~stock~~assets, ~~for~~including ~~each~~their ~~$100,000~~respective ~~advanced.~~intellectual ~~The~~property, ~~warrants~~accounts, ~~are~~receivables, ~~exercisable~~general atintangibles, ~~$5.00~~equipment, ~~per share~~inventory, ~~subject~~all toof ~~full-ratchet~~the ~~adjustment~~proceeds ~~for~~and ~~issuance~~products ~~below~~of the ~~exercise~~ ~~price,~~foregoing ~~subject~~and tothe ~~certain~~Company’s ~~exceptions.~~equity ~~The~~interests ~~warrants~~in ~~expire~~the onother ~~June 6, 2018~~Borrowers.

As partial consideration for providing advances under the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to each Lender warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of its common stock for each $100,000 advanced. The warrants are exercisable at $5.00 per share, subject to full-ratchet adjustment for issuance below the exercise price, subject to certain exceptions. The warrants expire on June 6, 2018. As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the exercise price of the Loan and Security Agreement warrants was adjusted to $2.15 and the number of warrants issuable was adjusted to 46,512 for each $100,000 advanced.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,016,674 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $1,944,688, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $174,118 of the debt discount.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 634,508 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $160,793, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the notes or until such time as the notes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. The valuation of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 35.05% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.39-1.63% and expected term of 3.55-3.66 years. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $18,678 of the debt discount related to these warrants.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

~~Pursuant~~The tofollowing ~~the draw downs during the year ended September 30~~officers, ~~2013,~~directors ~~the~~and ~~Company~~5% ~~issued~~shareholders ~~warrants to purchase an aggregate~~ of ~~606,680~~the ~~shares of common stock. The~~ Company ~~valued these warrants~~ atparticipated ~~$1,357,139, recorded~~ as aLenders ~~discount~~in ~~to long-term debt. During~~ the ~~nine~~Loan ~~months~~and ~~ended~~Security ~~June 30, 2014, the Company amortized $350,660 of the debt discount.~~Agreement:

Pursuant to the draw downs on October 29, 2013, February 27, 2014, May 19, 2014 and June 24, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 690,493 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $587,550, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the notes or until such time as the notes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. The valuation of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 35.85-43.36% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.56-1.75% and expected term of 3.95-4.6 years. During the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the Company amortized $147,521 of the of debt discount.

Name	Commitment		Amount Funded as of December 31, 2014		Aggregate Number of Warrants Issuable		Warrants Issued as of December 31, 2014
The Estate of Gene Mulvihill⁽¹⁾	$	500,000	$	500,000		232,561		232,561
Sunset Marathon Partners LLC⁽²⁾	$	250,000	$	250,000		116,281		116,281
MRP Holdings LLC⁽³⁾	$	400,000	$	200,000		116,047		93,027
Burton I. Koffman and David Koffman⁽⁴⁾	$	750,000	$	750,000		371,969		371,969
Anthony P. Miele III⁽⁵⁾	$	25,000	$	25,000		11,631		11,631
Alexandria Equities, LLC⁽⁶⁾	$	700,000	$	200,000		325,582		93,026
Albert Behler⁽⁷⁾	$	400,000	$	200,000		116,047		93,026
Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC⁽⁸⁾	$	1,000,000	$	-		465,117		-

The following officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company participated as Affiliate Lenders:

Name	Commitment		Amount Funded as of June 30, 2014		Aggregate Number of Warrants Issuable		Warrants Issued as of June 30, 2014
The Estate of Gene Mulvihill(1)	$	500,000	$	413,103		100,000		82,621
Sunset Marathon Partners LLC(2)	$	250,000	$	206,551		50,000		41,311
MRP Holdings LLC(3)	$	200,000	$	165,239		40,000		33,047
David Koffman and Burton I. Koffman(4)	$	750,000	$	619,955		150,000		123,932
Anthony P. Miele III(5)	$	25,000	$	20,654		5,000		4,132
Alexandria Equities, LLC(6)	$	200,000	$	165,236		40,000		33,049
Albert Behler(7)	$	200,000	$	165,236		40,000		33,049

(1)

Gail Mulvihill and Andrew Mulvihill, the co-administrators of the estate, exercise voting and investment power over the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. Gail Mulvihill is a principal stockholder of the Company and mother of Christopher, the Company’s President and a principal stockholder of the Company. Andrew Mulvihill is a brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(2) James Mulvihill, was a principal stockholder of the Company at the time we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement, has voting and investment power over the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and is a brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(3) MRP Holdings LLC is owned by Mark Patterson, the ~~Chief~~Chairman ~~Executive~~of ~~Officer~~the ~~and~~Board aof ~~director~~Directors, ~~and~~a principal stockholder and the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

(4) Directly and indirectly through entities they control and by members of their families and entities they control, Burton Koffman and David Koffman are principal stockholders of the Company. In addition, David Koffman ~~was~~is ~~appointed as~~ a director of the Company ~~and a member of the Audit Committee in November 2013~~.

(5)

Anthony P. Miele, III is a director of the Company.

(6) Alexandria Equities, LLC iswas a principal stockholder of the Company at the time we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement.

(7) Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.

	(7)	Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.

	(8)	Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC, is managed by Peter Mulvihill, brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

A majority of the principal amount of each series of convertible notes (due 2016, June 2017 and December 2017) consented to the Company’s entering into the Loan Agreement and increasing the secured indebtedness under the Loan Agreement, and acknowledged that the secured indebtedness under the Notes is senior in right of payment and otherwise to the convertible notes.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

	Principal
	As of
	12/31/2014			9/30/2014			Maturity Date	Interest Rate			Secured
	(unaudited)
Current Debt- Third Party:
Loan Payable- Third Party	$	80,538		$	80,538		Upon Demand		10	%	No
Equipment Note Payable (current portion)		-			9,024		1/15/2015		6	%	Yes
Total Current Debt- Third Party	$	80,538		$	89,562

Long-Term Debt – Third Party:
Long-Term Notes – June 2013 Loan Agreement		5,725,300			4,729,866		5/31/2016		15	%	Yes
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			3,665,763		11/1/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		200,000			1,250,000		11/18/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			925,000		12/9/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2012 Offering		200,000			4,065,000		6/14/2017		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – Dec 2012 Offering		-			1,230,000		12/28/2017		6	%	No
Discount on Notes		(1,772,209	)		(10,073,448	)
Amortization of Discount		834,434			5,077,137
Total Long-Term Debt – Third Party	$	5,187,525		$	10,869,318

Long-Term Debt- Related Party:
Long-Term Notes – June 2013 Loan Agreement	$	2,124,700		$	1,755,674		5/31/2016		15	%	Yes
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			5,683,757		11/1/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			100,000		11/18/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2012 Offering		-			2,135,000		6/14/2017		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – Dec 2012 Offering		-			1,845,000		12/28/2017		6	%	No
Discount on Notes		(585,148	)		(8,329,964	)
Amortization of Discount		282,238			4,335,717
Total Long-Term Debt- Related Party	$	1,821,790		$	7,525,184

	Principal
	As of
	6/30/2014			9/30/2013			Maturity Date	Interest Rate			Secured
	(unaudited)
Current Debt- Third Party:
Loan Payable- Third Party	$	80,538		$	80,538		Upon Demand		10	%	No
Equipment Note Payable (current portion)		17,486			34,119		1/15/2015		6	%	Yes
Total Current Debt- Third Party	$	98,024		$	114,657
Long-Term Debt – Third Party:
Equipment Note Payable (long-term portion)	$	-		$	6,136		1/15/2015		6	%	Yes
Long-Term Notes – June 2013 Loan Agreement		4,729,866			1,944,047		5/31/2016		15	%	Yes
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		3,665,763			3,665,763		11/1/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		1,250,000			1,250,000		11/18/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		925,000			925,000		12/9/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2012 Offering		4,065,000			4,065,000		6/14/2017		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – Dec 2012 Offering		1,230,000			1,230,000		12/28/2017		6	%	No
Discount on Convertible Notes		(10,073,448	)		(9,539,225	)
Amortization of Discount		4,515,612,			2,852,676
Total Long-Term Debt – Third Party	$	10,307,793		$	6,399,397
Long-Term Debt- Related Party:
Long-Term Notes – June 2013 Loan Agreement	$	1,755,674		$	1,089,286		5/31/2016		15	%	Yes
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		5,683,757			5,683,757		11/1/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		100,000			100,000		11/18/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2012 Offering		2,135,000			2,135,000		6/14/2017		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – Dec 2012 Offering		1,845,000			1,845,000		12/28/2017		6	%	No
Discount on Convertible Notes		(8,329,965	)		(8,276,639	)
Amortization of Discount		3,899,470			2,593,261
Total Long-Term Debt- Related Party	$	7,088,936		$	5,169,665

The aggregate maturities of our long-term debt are as follows:

Twelve months ended
June 30, 2016		6,485,540
December 31, 2016	$	8,050,000
June 30, 2017		17,824,520
December 31, 2017		200,000
June 30, 2018		3,075,000
Total	$	8,250,000
Total	$	27,385,060

NOTE 8 – EQUITY

Common Stock:

On October 31, 2014, pursuant to the Exchange Offer described in Note 7, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,583,384 shares of common stock at $2.15 per share, in exchange for outstanding convertible notes and warrants. Included in the Exchange Offer was the issuance of 48,674 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $104,463 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

~~NOTE~~On 8December –31, ~~EQUITY~~2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,815 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $6,050 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

~~Common~~At ~~Stock~~December 31, 2014, the Company required shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise as follows:

On December 31, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 199,987 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $316,069 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

Options			2,229,542
Warrants			8,262,502
Convertible Notes			127,090
Total Shares			10,619,134

On March 31, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 141,194 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $309,198 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $2.19 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

On June 30, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 140,639 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $312,634 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $2.22 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

At June 30, 2014, the Company required shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise as follows:

Options			1,266,260
Warrants			10,880,654
Convertible Notes			4,914,039
Total Shares			17,060,953

Warrants:

As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock asin ~~payment of interest on~~ the ~~2011 Notes~~Exchange Offer, ~~2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes,~~ the exercise prices of the ~~2011~~remaining ~~Warrants,~~outstanding ~~2012~~2011 Warrants and ~~December~~ 2012 Warrants were adjusted to $3.~~98,~~00 ~~$4.64~~ and $43.6831, respectively.

Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement described in Note 7, onduring ~~May~~the ~~19,~~quarter ~~and~~ended ~~June~~December 2431, 2014, we issued warrants to Lenders to purchase ~~and~~an aggregate of ~~200~~634,~~012~~508 shares of Common Stock of the Company (after giving effect to the Exchange Offer). The warrants are exercisable at $52.0015 per share (after giving effect to the Exchange Offer), subject to full ratchet adjustment for issuance below the exercise price, subject to certain exceptions. Additionally, the exercise price may not be adjusted below $1.00. Cashless exercise is permitted if the average trading volume of the Company’s Common Stock during at least five (5) of the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of the notice of exercise is at least 10,000 shares, and will be based upon the average of the last sale price of the Common Stock during such five (5) consecutive trading day period. The warrants expire on June 6, 2018. When these warrants were issued, the fair value of each warrant granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: (i) risk free interest rate of 1.5639-1.7063%, ~~(ii)~~and expected ~~life~~term of 3.9555-43.0566 years, (iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 35.8505%. The Company valued these warrants at $15160,~~112~~794, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the Loan and Security Agreement or until such time as itthe isnotes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, the Company amortized $~~293~~18,678 of ~~the~~ the of debt discount.

Options:

On ~~February~~November 2717, 2014, wethe ~~granted~~Company toissued ~~employees~~ options to purchase ~~364~~471,~~250~~719 shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock of the Company, ~~under~~to ~~the~~Mark ~~Company’s~~Patterson, ~~2012~~former ~~Stock~~Chief ~~Incentive~~Executive ~~Plan.~~Officer, ~~The~~and options ~~are~~to ~~exercisable~~purchase 176,894 atshares ~~$1.51~~of ~~per~~common ~~share~~stock ~~and~~of ~~have~~the aCompany ~~term~~to ofChristopher ~~five~~Mulvihill, ~~years~~President. The options ~~are~~were ~~subject~~issued toin aexchange ~~vesting~~for ~~schedule~~an aggregate of $459,643 ~~under~~of ~~which~~deferred ~~one-third~~compensation. ofThe ~~the~~ options ~~will~~are ~~vest~~exercisable onat ~~each~~$2.15 ofper ~~February 27~~share, ~~2015,~~have ~~February~~a ~~27,~~term ~~2016,~~of ~~and~~five ~~February~~years ~~27,~~and ~~2017.~~vest immediately. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: (i) risk free interest rate of 1.4964%, (ii) expected life of 5 years, (iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 3835.3934%. The Company valued these ~~warrants~~options at $~~199~~459,~~084~~643 and ~~is allocating this expense over~~ recorded the ~~vesting period. The Company recorded an~~ expense ~~of $22,120 related to these options~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014.

On November 17, 2014, the Company issued options to purchase 275,169 shares of common stock of the Company to a consultant. The options were issued in exchange for approximately $195,000 of services provided to the Company. The options are exercisable at $2.15 per share, have a term of five years and vest immediately. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The assumptions used were similar to those used for the option grants to Messrs. Patterson and Mulvihill on November 17, 2014. The Company valued these options at $195,000 and recorded the expense during the three months ended December 31, 2014.

On November 17, 2014, the Company granted options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock of the Company to each of Directors Joseph Bellantoni, Maureen Cowell, Kevin Cassidy, David Koffman and Anthony Miele. The options are exercisable at $2.15 per share and have a term of five years. The options are subject to a vesting schedule, under which one-third of the options will vest immediately, and one-third of the options will vest on each of November 17, 2015 and November 17, 2016. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The assumptions used were similar to those used for the option grants to Messrs. Patterson and Mulvihill on November 17, 2014. The Company valued these options at $88,582 and is allocating this expense over the vesting period. The Company recorded an expense of $7,382 related to these options during the three months ended December 31, 2014.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

On ~~February~~November 2717, 2014, the Company ~~issued~~granted ~~to a consultant~~ options to purchase ~~303~~20,~~625~~ 000 shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock of the Company, ~~under~~to the ~~Company’s~~former ~~2012~~Chief ~~Stock~~Operating ~~Incentive~~Officer ~~Plan. The options were issued in exchange for approximately $166,000~~ of ~~services provided to~~ the Company. The options are exercisable at $12.51 15 per share, have a term of five years and vest immediately. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: ~~were~~(i) risk ~~similar~~free tointerest ~~those~~rate ~~used~~of ~~for~~1.49%, ~~the~~(ii) ~~employee option~~expected ~~grant~~life onof ~~February~~5 27years, ~~2014~~(iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 35.05%. The Company valued these options at $~~165~~14,~~949~~373 and recorded the expense during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014.

During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded an expense of $49,335 related to options issued in fiscal year 2014 under the Company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

HSK Funding, Inc., Lake Isle Corp., and Venturetek, LP, are beneficial holders of shares of our company’s common stock and certain of their members and stockholders are also ~~the~~ the members of SB&G Properties, LC. (“SB&G”), which is the landlord under a lease with us at 324 West 2450 North, Building B, Logan, Utah. Gail Mulvihill, the individual who exercises sole voting and investment control over Lake Isle Corp., is the mother of Christopher Mulvihill, our President, and is a principal stockholder of our company. The approximately 29,750 square foot leased premises are used for Boomerang’s manufacturing activities. This is a month-to-month lease at a rate of $21,717 per month, of which $14,717 is classified as deferred rent. Deferred rental payments totaling $~~485~~573,~~677~~982 have been accrued as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and classified as due to related party on our balance sheet.

Stan Checketts Properties (“SCP”), a company owned by the former chief executive officer of Boomerang’s wholly owned subsidiary, Boomerang Sub, Inc., is the landlord under a lease with us for premises located at 324 West 2450 North, Building B, Logan, Utah. The approximately 18,000 square foot leased premises are, in addition to Building A, also used for Boomerang’s manufacturing activities. ~~We are currently leasing an additional 2,400 square feet of office and conference room space with Stan Checketts Properties for $1,800 per month.~~ This is a month-to-month lease at a rate of $1413,~~940~~140 per month.

SB&G is obligated on a twenty-year promissory note due ~~August~~ August 1, 2027 owing to Zions Bank. The principal amount due was $~~666~~645,~~270~~611 as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, and the note bears interest at at 3.807% per annum. The promissory note is collateralized by the real property that is the subject of the lease from SB&G to to Boomerang Utah. Boomerang, the Estate of Gene Mulvihill and Messrs. Stan Checketts and Burton Koffman are the joint and several guarantors of this promissory note. Gene Mulvihill was the husband of Gail Mulvihill and the father of Christopher Mulvihill, the President of the Company.

The Estate of Gene Mulvihill and Burton Koffman are the guarantors of a financing lease entered into on September 1, 2007 between Boomerang Utah and a nonaffiliated bank. The lease relates to certain equipment used by Boomerang Utah in its manufacturing operations. The total cost of the equipment was approximately $900,000. The rental was payable in sixty monthly installments of approximately $12,750, through August 31, 2012. At that time, Boomerang Utah had the option to purchase the equipment for approximately $315,000 or refinance it for an additional twenty four months. Boomerang refinanced the rental over twenty four months and has the option to purchase the equipment for $1 at the conclusion of the lease term. The lease commenced on January 1, 2013 and ends on December 1, 2014, with twenty four monthly installments of approximately $13,890. In the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company sold part of the equipment on this lease and paid the lease down from $315,000 to $40,255. As of June 30, 2014, the remaining amount on the lease is $17,486.

The Company used the services of Coordinate Services, Inc. for product development in fiscal 2013. The owner of Coordinate Services, Inc., is Gene Mulvihill, Jr., the brother of Christopher Mulvihill, our President, and the son of Gail Mulvihill. The amount of this expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $102,711 respectively; which is recorded under research and development expenses.

The Company reimbursed North Jersey Management Services, Inc. for consulting expenses during fiscal 2013 for the services of Joseph Bellantoni, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Maureen Cowell, the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Mr. Bellantoni is also the President and Mrs. Cowell is the Vice President of North Jersey Management Services, Inc. Mr. Bellantoni and Ms. Cowell are directors of the Company. The amount of this expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $19,500 respectively; which is recorded under general and administrative expenses.

In April 2010, we entered into a twenty-year ground lease with Route 94 Development Corporation (“Route 94”) to lease a portion of an approximately fifteen acre parcel in the town of Hamburg, located in Hardyston Township, New Jersey, on which we constructed a RoboticValet™ parking facility. The leased property is adjacent to Grand Cascades Lodge (“Cascades”), a hotel within the Crystal Springs Golf and Spa Resort (“the Resort”). The parking facility was constructed by Crystal Springs Builders, LLC (“Builders”). It is intended that this facility will be used by us primarily for demonstration and marketing purposes in the eastern portion of the United States. In consideration of the benefits to us under the terms of the lease, we agree to provide to the lessor and its affiliates parking and storage space within the facility at no cost to the lessor and its affiliates subject to our right to use the facility for demonstration purposes. In addition, we are required to pay the operating costs, premiums on the insurance required under the terms of the lease and incremental property taxes resulting from our construction of the facility. For a period of 60 months, commencing five years after execution of the lease, the lessor has the option to purchase the facility from us and we have a right to cause the lessor to buy from us the facility we construct. The price to be paid by the lessor upon exercise of its option to purchase the facility is 110% of the greater of (i) the depreciated value of the facility, or (ii) the fair market value of the facility, and the price to be paid by the lessor upon exercise of our right to cause the lessor to buy the facility is $1.00.

The Resort owns and operates seven golf courses, two hotels and a fitness facility and develops real estate in Sussex County NJ, which is comprised of more than 40 additional entities, including the above named entities. Gail Mulvihill owns 50% of each of Builders, Cascades and Route 94 and, indirectly, through these and various other entities, Gail Mulvihill and her family own approximately 50% of the Resort. Except as set forth above, no other officer, director or 5% or greater stockholder of the Company has any equity interest in Builders, Cascades or Route 94. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $1,000 and $44,000 for Cascades for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No expenses were incurred for Route 94 or Builders during the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

The Resort owns and operates seven golf courses, two hotels and a fitness facility and develops real estate in Sussex County NJ, which is comprised of more than 40 additional entities, including the above named entities. Gail Mulvihill owns 50% of each of Builders, Cascades and Route 94 and, indirectly, through these and various other entities, Gail Mulvihill and her family own approximately 50% of the Resort. Except as set forth above, no other officer, director or 5% or greater stockholder of the Company has any equity interest in Builders, Cascades or Route 94. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $7,000 and $44,000 for Cascades for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No expenses were incurred for Route 94 or Builders during the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Certain officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company participated as Affiliate Lenders under the June 2013 Loan and Security Agreement. See Note 7.

Our management believes that the terms of the above transactions are as favorable to our company as could have been obtained from nonaffiliated persons at the time and under the circumstances as when the transactions were entered into.

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Boomerang Utah is a joint and several guarantor on a twenty-year promissory note owing to Zions Bank in the principal amount of $~~666~~645,~~270~~611 as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, bearing interest at 3.807% per ~~annum~~ annum and due August 1, 2027. The promissory note is collateralized by the real property that is the subject of the lease from SB&G to Boomerang. The Estate of Gene Mulvihill and Messrs. Checketts and Burton Koffman, are the other joint and ~~several~~ several guarantors of the promissory note.

WeIn March 2013, we entered into a five year lease on aour ~~new~~ principal office, which expires in March 2018. The aggregate future minimum annual rental payments on this lease, exclusive of escalation ~~payments~~ payments for taxes and operating costs, are as follows:

Twelve months ended June 30, 2015	$	42,508
Twelve months ended December 31, 2015	$	42,508
June 30, 2016		42,508
December 31, 2016		42,508
June 30, 2017		42,508
December 31, 2017		42,508
June 30, 2018		31,879
December 31, 2018		10,627
Total	$	~~159~~138,~~403~~151

On March 15, 2013, Crescent Heights R&D, LLC (“Crescent Heights”), filed a complaint against Boomerang in the State of Florida for fraud, breach of contract and specific performance, as well as equitable rescission which alleged an unspecified amount of damages in excess of the purchase price. Boomerang was subsequently granted a motion to remove this matter to federal court. On May 17, 2013, the court entered an order that our motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings be granted. The parties ~~have~~ agreed to arbitrate the matter in front of the American ~~Arbitration~~ Arbitration Association. ~~An arbitrator has been selected and an arbitration hearing will take place~~ in November 2014. The ~~parties are presently conducting discovery in preparation for arbitration. The~~ dispute arises from a contract to provide a rack and rail automated parking system. Crescent Heights’ claims, Boomerang’s defenses and Boomerang’s affirmative claims all arise from the contract. ~~Due~~On toJanuary 23, 2015, the ~~ongoing~~arbitrator ~~arbitration~~issued ~~with~~an Interim Arbitration Award. The arbitrator denied Crescent Heights’ claims of fraud in the inducement, equitable rescission based on fraud, and declaratory relief to strike the limitation of liability clause, but found Boomerang ~~has~~in ~~eliminated~~Breach of Contract. Crescent Heights was awarded damages of $1,197,887, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. We expect the ~~warranty~~Arbitrator to issue a final arbitration award in April 2015, which will include the attorney’s fees and costs payable by Boomerang. Boomerang established a reserve of $1,372,887 for the amount ~~associated~~of ~~with~~the ~~this~~award, ~~project~~plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

On May 15, 2013, Boomerang entered into a Manufacturing and ~~Licensing~~ Licensing Agreement (the “Agreement”) with JBT Corporation (“JBT”), pursuant to which JBT would manufacture ~~all~~ all Boomerang automated guided vehicles (“AGVs”) and license certain software to us for use in our robotic parking systems, including a non-exclusive, non-transferable, license to sub-license the software to customers for the duration of each ~~customer~~ customer contract with Boomerang. In each year from the effective date of May 15, 2013, Boomerang was required to purchase a minimum of of 25 AGVs from JBT based on JBT’s cost plus an agreed upon profit. If we did not meet these minimum requirements, JBT’s sole remedy was to terminate the Agreement. In the event of expiration or termination of the Agreement, JBT is subject to a three-year non-competition provision, and obligated to license to Boomerang software for up to three years from the expiration or termination date. The Agreement was terminated by JBT effective May 23, 2014, due to Boomerang not meeting the minimum purchase requirements described above. AsWith ~~previously disclosed in our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, with~~ JBT’s knowledge, Boomerang manufactured, assembled, tested and delivered all AGVs for our first RoboticValet project, BrickellHouse, and expects to do so for subsequent projects in which our first-generation AGV design is included. As mentioned above, under the Agreement, Boomerang has the right to continue to license software through May 22, 2017, and expects to collaborate with JBT on a project-by-project basis going forward.

On June 6, 2013, Boomerang entered into a marketing agreement with BrickellHouse Holding, LLC, whereas BrickellHouse Holding, LLC will allow Boomerang to use its parking system for sales and marketing purposes. Boomerang will pay BrickellHouse Holding, LLC a royalty for each sale of a system equal to 2% of the purchase price of that system, not to exceed an aggregate of $2 million. The agreement shall be in effect until the amount of royalty payments reaches $2 million. As of December 31, 2014, the Company accrued $41,529 of royalty payments under this agreement.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE ~~NINE AND~~ THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014

On June 6, 2013, Boomerang entered into a marketing agreement with BrickellHouse Holding, LLC, whereas BrickellHouse Holding, LLC will allow Boomerang to use its parking system for sales and marketing purposes. Boomerang will pay BrickellHouse Holding, LLC a royalty for each sale of a system equal to 2% of the purchase price of that system, not to exceed an aggregate of $2 million. The agreement shall be in effect until the amount of royalty payments reaches $2 million. As of June 30, 2014, the Company accrued $20,000 of royalty payments under this agreement.

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has reviewed events that have occurred after ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, through the date of issuance of the financial statements.

OnEffective ~~July~~as ~~14,~~of ~~2014~~January 13, ~~Boomerang~~2015 ~~announced~~(the ~~that~~“Effective itDate”), Boomerang ~~has~~entered ~~commenced~~ into an ~~offer~~employment toagreement ~~exchange~~with ~~outstanding~~James ~~2011~~Gelly ~~Notes,~~to ~~2012~~serve ~~Notes~~as ~~and~~its ~~December~~chief ~~2012~~executive ~~Notes~~officer and ~~2011~~as ~~Warrants,~~a ~~2012~~director ~~Warrants~~of ~~and December~~the ~~2012~~Company. ~~Warrants~~Mr. ~~issued~~Gelly ~~under~~replaces ~~three~~Mark ~~private~~Patterson, ~~placements~~who inhas ~~2011~~resigned ~~and~~as ~~2012~~CEO ~~for~~as ~~the issuance~~ of ~~common stock at~~ the ~~rate~~Effective ofDate. $2Mr.15 ~~per share~~Patterson inwill ~~exchange~~continue ~~for~~to ~~the~~serve as ~~entire~~chairman ~~balance (principal and interest)~~ of the ~~notes~~Company’s ~~and~~board ~~warrants~~of ~~issued with the applicable note (the “Offer”)~~directors. ~~The~~Also ~~holders~~effective as of the ~~2011~~Effective ~~Notes~~Date, ~~2012~~the ~~Notes~~Company ~~and~~appointed ~~December~~George ~~2012~~Gelly as ~~Notes~~its ~~and~~chief ~~related~~operating ~~warrants are eligible to participate in the Offer~~officer.

In connection with his appointment as CEO, the Company granted to James Gelly non-plan options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company with a five year term, vesting as to one-third of the shares on each of the Effective Date and the first and second anniversaries of the date of the Effective Date, exercisable at an exercise price of $2.15 per share. In connection with his appointment as COO, the Company granted to George Gelly non-plan options to purchase 450,000 shares of common stock of the Company with a five year term, vesting as to one-third of the shares on each of the Effective Date and the first and second anniversaries of the date of the Effective Date, exercisable at an exercise price of $2.15 per share.

ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OperationS

INTRODUCTION

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to the risks discussed in this report.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and cash equivalents for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~December ~~2014~~31, 2014 increased by $17,~~000,508~~079 to $1965,~~637,448~~956. ~~This~~As ~~increase is attributable to cash provided by financing activities~~ of ~~$3,429,439, offset~~December ~~by cash used in operations of $2~~31,~~420,510~~ ~~and cash used in investing activities of $8~~2014,~~421.~~ ~~At the present time, we believe~~ our working capital together with ~~the~~borrowings ~~available~~of ~~borrowings~~approximately $7.05 million available under our Loan and Security Agreement ~~(defined~~expect ~~below)~~to ~~and~~allow ~~the~~us ~~expected cash~~to ~~flow~~carry ~~from~~out ~~ongoing~~our ~~projects~~business ~~will~~plan beuntil ~~sufficient~~at toleast March ~~support~~2016 ~~our~~without ~~administrative~~securing ~~requirements~~any ~~and~~additional ~~existing projects until March 2015~~contracts. To implement our full business plan, we ~~will~~may require additional funds, and anticipate ~~are~~raising ~~now seeking to raise~~ these funds through public or private debt or equity offerings, including offerings to our existing security holders. ~~We intend to seek to obtain additional commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement to increase the aggregate amount of commitments from $7,850,000 to $10,000,000.~~ In addition, we ~~are~~may ~~seeking~~seek to restructure our existing liabilities and debt. On July 14, 2014, Boomerang announced that it has commenced an offer to exchange outstanding 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes and 2011 Warrants, 2012 Warrants and December 2012 Warrants issued under three private placements in 2011 and 2012 for the issuance of common stock at the rate of $2.15 per share in exchange for the entire balance (principal and interest) of the notes and warrants issued with the applicable note (the “Offer”). The holders of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes and related warrants are eligible to participate in the Offer. There can be no assurance that the capital we require to meet our operating needs will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unsuccessful in raising sufficient capital, we may be required to curtail our operations ~~and could default on our existing indebtedness~~. ~~The unaudited, condensed financial statements included in this report do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.~~

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, we had ~~net~~a ~~income~~net loss of $112,~~236~~379,~~326~~471. Included in this net ~~income~~loss were several non-cash expenses that partially offset the ~~cash~~use ~~used~~of ~~in operations~~cash. These non-cash expenses include depreciation of $~~219~~63,~~454~~557, amortization of discount on ~~convertible~~ debt of $2475,~~969~~743,~~145,~~ ~~grant~~issuance of ~~options~~ common stock for ~~services~~interest expense of $~~188~~110,~~069~~513, ~~loss~~expenses onfrom ~~disposal~~the issuance of ~~equipment~~stock options of $7725,~~789~~733, and ~~issuance~~debt ofconversion ~~common~~expense ~~stock for interest~~ of $~~937~~9,~~901~~350,726. These ~~non-cash~~items ~~expenses~~ were offset by a non-cash gain on the fair value of derivative of $11621,~~058,653~~581. Cash ~~used~~decreased inas ~~operations~~we ~~was~~experienced ~~primarily~~three month ~~related~~increases toin ~~nine~~prepaid ~~month~~expenses ~~increases~~and inother ~~inventories~~assets of $~~286~~139,~~398~~386, ~~and~~in ~~accounts~~retainage receivable of $~~770~~84,~~097~~015 and in inventories of $57,726. Cash ~~These~~also ~~items~~decreased ~~were~~as ~~offset~~we byexperienced ~~increases~~ a decrease in ~~accounts~~billings ~~payable~~in ~~and~~excess ~~accrued~~of ~~liabilities~~costs of $1694,~~106~~927,~~705,~~ and in estimated loss on uncompleted contract of $8299,~~921,~~509. ~~due~~Cash toincreased ~~related~~as ~~party of~~we ~~$132,457,~~experienced ~~deposit~~three ~~payable~~month decreases in accounts receivable of $95562,~~000~~884, and ~~billings~~ increases in ~~excess~~deposits ofpayable ~~costs~~ of $2125,~~265~~000,~~455.~~ ~~In addition, cash used~~ in ~~operations~~accounts ~~decreased due~~payable toand aaccrued ~~decrease~~liabilities ~~in prepaid expenses~~ of $721,~~786~~280,782, and ~~costs~~ in ~~excess~~due ofto ~~billings~~related parties of $~~380~~44,~~630~~152. After adjusting our net loss for these non-cash items and the net changes in assets and liabilities, net cash used in operations was $21,~~420~~337,~~510~~525 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014.

Financing activities provided $31,~~429~~355,~~439~~436 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014. Net cash provided by financing activities consisted of $31,~~452~~364,~~207~~460 of borrowings under the Loan Agreement, offset by $229,~~768~~024 of note repayments.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, net cash used in in investing activities consisted of ~~acquisitions~~additional purchases of property, plant and equipment of $810,~~421~~832.

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the three months ended December 31, 2014 that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.

Convertible Notes

As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, and reflective of the Exchange Offer described below, the Company had ~~approximately~~ $~~20.9~~400,000 ~~million~~ of indebtedness under convertible promissory notes associated with the November/December 2011 Offering (“2011 Notes”), and June/July 2012 Offering (“2012 Notes”) and ~~December~~collectively ~~2012 Offering (“December 2012 Notes” and, together with~~ the ~~2011 Notes and 2012 Notes, the~~ “Notes”). The Notes become due between November 2016 and December 2017. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, the 2011 Notes and 2012 Notes were convertible into 266,~~920,758~~667 shares of common stock at $3.9800, ~~1,336,220 shares of common stock at $4.64~~ and ~~657~~60,~~061~~423 shares of common stock at $43.6831, respectively. The ~~2011~~ Notes ~~and 2012 Notes~~ are subject to a weighted average adjustment~~, and~~ ~~the December 2012 Notes a full ratchet adjustment, in each case,~~ for issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions. The respective conversion price for the 2012 Notes ~~and December 2012 Notes~~ may not be adjusted below $0.25. Interest accrues on the Notes at 6% per annum, payable quarterly at the Company’s option in: (i) cash or (ii) shares of Common Stock.

Certain officers, directors, 5% stockholders and affiliates hold approximately $9.8 million aggregate principal amount of such Notes.

For so long as the above Notes are outstanding, without the prior written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Notes, the Company may not:

· create, incur, assume or suffer to exist, any indebtedness, contingent and otherwise, which should, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied, be classified upon the Company's balance sheet as liabilities and which would be senior or pari passu in right of payment to the notes, except for: (i) secured or unsecured debt issued to a bank or financial institution on commercially reasonable terms, or (ii) any other debt not to exceed $5 million, individually, or in the aggregate, provided herein that the Company may incur up to an aggregate of $100 million of debt under clause (ii) on terms approved by the Company’s board of directors;

· and may not, unless approved by the Company’s board of directors, permit its subsidiaries to, engage in any transactions with any officer, director, employee or any affiliate of the Company, including any contract, agreement or other arrangement providing for the furnishing of services to or by, providing for rental of real or personal property to or from, or otherwise requiring payments to or from any officer, director or such employee or, to the knowledge of the Company, any entity in which any officer, director, or any such employee has a substantial interest or is an officer, director, trustee or partner, in each case in excess of $50,000, other than: (i) for payment of reasonable salary for services actually rendered, as approved by the Board of Directors of the Company as fair in all respects to the Company, (ii) reimbursement for expenses incurred on behalf of the Company (iii) transactions and written arrangements in existence on the date of the initial issuance of the notes, and any amendments, modifications, cancellations, terminations, limitations and waivers approved by a majority of the independent disinterested directors of the Company; and

· and may not, unless approved by the Company’s board of directors, permit any subsidiary to: (i) declare or pay any dividends or make any distributions to any holder(s) of common stock or such subsidiaries (other than dividends and distributions from a subsidiary to the Company) or (ii) purchase or otherwise acquire for value, directly or indirectly, any shares or other equity security of the Company, other than the notes or warrants issued in connection with the notes

Exchange Offer

Derivative Liability

The Company has valued the warrants issued in connection with the November/December 2011 Offering, the 2011 Warrants, and the beneficial conversion features (“BCF”) of the 2011 Notes, to their maximum value in proportion to the 2011 Notes and had accounted for them as a discount to the debt. In certain circumstances the convertibility features and the attached Warrants contain reset provisions which adjust the conversion price of the 2011 Notes and the exercise price of the 2011 Warrants should the Company sell additional shares of common stock below the initial conversion price of the 2011 Notes or warrant exercise price as agreed to upon entry into the convertible notes payable. The Company has assessed that the reset provision for the convertibility feature and the warrant exercise price are such that they are not indexed to the Common Stock and is therefore a derivative in accordance with ASC 815-40 ~~(formerly EITF 07-5)~~. As such the derivative was valued on the date of its initiation, with each issuance of convertible debt, and will be re-valued at its fair value at each subsequent interim and annual reporting period.

AsThe ofCompany ~~September~~valued ~~30, 2013,~~ the ~~aggregate~~2011 ~~fair~~Warrants ~~value~~and of the ~~derivative~~beneficial conversion ~~was~~features ~~$11,537,248.~~(“BCF”) ~~The revaluation~~ of the ~~derivative~~2011 ~~as of June 30~~Notes, ~~2014~~and ~~resulted~~the inresulting a derivative ~~value~~liability, ofat $~~694~~5,~~980.~~309,941 ~~The~~each ~~change in~~for ~~fair~~the ~~value~~2011 ofWarrants and the ~~derivative from September 30~~BCF, ~~2013~~for toa ~~June~~total 30of $10,619,882 ~~2014~~recorded ~~resulted~~as in a ~~gain~~discount onto the ~~fair~~convertible ~~value~~debt ofduring the ~~derivative liability~~first quarter of ~~$10,842,268~~fiscal 2012. This ~~Substantially~~discount ~~all~~will ofbe ~~the~~amortized ~~increase~~over in the ~~gain~~life onof the ~~fair~~note ~~value~~or ofuntil ~~the~~such ~~derivative~~time ~~was~~as ~~due~~the tonote ais ~~change in~~repaid ~~methodology~~or inconverted, ~~measuring~~or ~~the~~upon ~~market price~~ exercise of the ~~Company’s~~2011 ~~common~~Warrants. ~~stock~~The ~~during~~valuation of the ~~quarter~~2011 ~~ended~~Warrants, ~~March 31~~BCF, ~~2014~~and ~~(see Note~~the ~~2).~~resulting ~~The~~ derivative liability ~~was revalued on June 30~~, ~~2014~~were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0%, ii) expected volatility of 3552.857%, iii) risk free interest rate of 10.629%, and iv) expected term of ~~2.35~~5 years ~~and v) market price of $2~~.20. If the Company did not change this method of valuation, it would have recognized a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of approximately $1,482,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014.

InAs ~~connection~~of ~~with~~September ~~the~~30, ~~2011 Offering~~2014, the ~~Company~~aggregate ~~issued~~fair ~~warrants to~~value ~~the~~of ~~placement agent (~~the ~~“Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Company issued an~~derivative ~~aggregate~~was ~~of 109,176 Placement Agent Warrants in November and December 2011 valued at~~ $~~212~~646,~~040~~120. The ~~Placement~~revaluation ~~Agent~~of ~~Warrants were valued based on~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~derivative ~~Model~~as ~~with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers~~ of ~~2011~~December ~~Notes in the 2011 Offering. The Placement Agent Warrants have similar terms to those issued to the convertible debt holders~~31, ~~including~~ a2014 ~~reset~~resulted ~~provision~~in ~~included with the warrants if the Company should obtain equity financing at~~ a ~~price~~derivative ~~per~~value ~~share lower than that~~ of ~~the exercise price of the warrants~~$17,331. The ~~Placement Agent Warrants, similar to the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers~~change ~~of 2011 Notes~~ in ~~the~~fair ~~2011 Offering, do not meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a derivative liability for the~~ value of the ~~Placement Agent Warrants. The~~ derivative ~~liability~~from ~~valued at $230,256 at~~ September 30, ~~2013~~2014 ~~was~~to ~~revalued~~December ~~at $13~~31,~~871~~ ~~at June 30,~~ 2014. ~~The~~resulted ~~difference~~ in ~~valuation for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 was $216,385, accounted for as~~ a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of $628,789. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to ~~a change in methodology in measuring~~ the ~~market price~~reduction of the ~~Company’s~~principal ~~common~~amount ~~stock~~of ~~during~~ the ~~quarter~~convertible ~~ended~~notes ~~March~~as ~~31,~~a ~~2014~~result ~~(see~~of ~~Note~~the 2)Exchange Offer. The ~~valuation~~derivative atliability ~~June~~was ~~30,~~revalued ~~2014~~on ~~was valued~~December ~~based~~31, on2014 using the Black-Scholes ~~Model~~option ~~with~~pricing ~~assumptions~~model ~~similar~~with tothe ~~those~~following ~~used~~weighted toassumptions: ~~value~~i) ~~the~~expected ~~2011~~dividend ~~Warrants~~rate ~~granted~~of to0% ii) ~~the~~expected ~~debt~~volatility ~~holders as~~ of ~~June 30, 2014~~34.83% Ifiii) ~~the~~risk ~~Company~~free ~~did~~interest ~~not~~rate ~~change this method~~ of ~~valuation~~1.65%, itiv) ~~would~~expected ~~have~~term ~~recognized~~of a1.85 ~~gain~~years onand ~~the~~v) ~~fair~~market ~~value of~~price ~~the derivative liability~~ of ~~approximately~~ $~~29,000~~2.15.

June 2013 Loan and Security Agreement

On June 11, 2013, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Boomerang Sub, Inc., Boomerang USA Corp. and Boomerang MP Holdings Inc. (collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers” and individually, a “Borrower”), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) dated as of June 6, 2013 with lenders who became a lender party thereto (together with any party which subsequently becomes a lender party, the “Lenders” and, individually, a “Lender”) and the Agent (as defined in the Loan Agreement). Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, Lenders committed to fund $4,750,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers. The Loan Agreement ~~contemplates~~contemplated that the aggregate principal amount of borrowings may be increased to $10,000,000 through commitments from additional Lenders who subsequently become a party to the Loan Agreement.

On July 12, 2013 and August 6, 2013, the Borrowers entered into Amendments No. 1 (the “Amendment”) and No. 2 (the “2^nd Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement (collectively “the Amendments”). Pursuant to the Amendments, the additional Lenders committed to fund an additional $3,100,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers, bringing aggregate commitments under the Loan Agreement to $7,850,000.

AsOn ofDecember ~~September 30~~24, ~~2013~~2014, the ~~Company~~Borrowers ~~drew~~entered ~~down~~into ~~an aggregate~~Amendment ofNo. $3~~,033,333~~ ~~under~~ (the ~~Loan~~“3rd ~~Agreement~~Amendment”). ~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~drew~~the ~~down~~3rd anAmendment, ~~additional~~the ~~$1,452,207~~maximum ~~during~~aggregate principal amount of borrowings under the ~~three~~Loan ~~months~~and ~~ended~~Security ~~December 31,~~Agreement ~~2013,~~was increased to $115,000,000. ~~during~~Additionally, ~~the~~Lenders ~~three~~and ~~months~~incremental lenders ~~ended~~committed ~~March~~to ~~31,~~fund ~~2014~~an ~~and~~additional $17,~~000~~050,000 ~~during~~principal ~~the~~amount ~~three~~of ~~months~~loans ~~ended~~to ~~June~~the 30Borrowers, ~~2014,~~ bringing ~~the~~aggregate ~~total amount of borrowings~~ commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement to $614,~~485~~900,~~540 as of June 30, 2014~~000.

The notes bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum, payable upon maturity. The maturity date of the Notes is May 31, 2016, subject to earlier prepayment upon acceleration of the occurrence of an event of default (as defined in the Loan agreement); provided further that the Company may prepay the Notes at any time without penalty. The Company accrued $549,506 of interest expense during the nine months ended June 30, 2014. Total accrued interest related to the Loan Agreement was $656,876 as of June 30, 2014.

Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Borrowers assigned, pledged and granted to the Lenders a security interest in substantially all of their respective assets, including their respective intellectual property, accounts, receivables, general intangibles, equipment, inventory, all of the proceeds and products of the foregoing and the Company’s equity interests in the other Borrowers.

As ~~partial~~of ~~consideration~~September ~~for~~30, ~~providing advances under the Loan Agreement~~2014, the Company ~~agreed~~drew todown ~~issue~~an toaggregate of ~~each~~$6,485,540 ~~Lender~~under ~~warrants~~the toLoan ~~purchase~~and ~~20,000~~Security ~~shares~~Agreement. ofThe ~~its~~Company ~~common~~drew ~~stock~~down ~~for~~an ~~each~~additional $~~100~~1,~~000 advanced.~~314,460 ~~The~~during ~~warrants~~the ~~are~~three ~~exercisable~~months atended December ~~$5.00~~31, ~~per share~~2014, ~~subject~~bringing tothe ~~full-ratchet~~total ~~adjustment~~amount ~~for~~of ~~issuance~~borrowings ~~below~~under the ~~exercise price,~~Loan ~~subject~~and toSecurity ~~certain~~Agreement ~~exceptions.~~to ~~The~~$7,850,000 ~~warrants~~as ~~expire~~of ~~on June 6~~December 31, ~~2018~~2014.

~~Pursuant~~The tonotes bear interest at the ~~draw~~rate ~~downs~~of ~~during~~15% per annum, payable upon maturity. The maturity date of the ~~year~~Notes ~~ended~~is ~~September 30~~May 31, ~~2013~~2016, ~~the~~subject ~~Company~~to ~~issued~~earlier ~~warrants~~prepayment toupon ~~purchase~~acceleration anof ~~aggregate~~the occurrence of ~~606,680~~an ~~shares~~event of ~~common~~default ~~stock.~~(as ~~The~~defined in the Loan and Security Agreement); provided further that the Company ~~valued~~may ~~these~~prepay ~~warrants~~the Notes at ~~$1,357,139,~~any ~~recorded~~time aswithout apenalty. ~~discount~~The toCompany ~~long-term~~accrued ~~debt.~~$281,729 ~~During~~of interest expense during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014,. Total accrued interest related to the ~~Company~~Loan ~~amortized~~and Security Agreement was $~~350~~1,~~660~~ 183,811 as of ~~the~~December ~~debt~~31, ~~discount~~2014.

Pursuant to the ~~draw~~Loan ~~downs~~and onSecurity ~~October 29~~Agreement, ~~2013,~~the ~~February 27,~~Borrowers ~~2014~~assigned, ~~May~~pledged ~~19, 2014~~ and ~~June~~granted ~~24,~~to ~~2014,~~ the ~~Company~~Lenders ~~issued~~a ~~warrants~~security tointerest ~~purchase~~in ansubstantially ~~aggregate~~all of ~~690,493~~their ~~shares~~respective ofassets, ~~common~~including ~~stock.~~their ~~The~~respective ~~Company~~intellectual ~~valued~~property, ~~these~~accounts, ~~warrants~~receivables, atgeneral ~~$587~~intangibles,~~550~~ equipment, ~~recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the notes or until such time as the notes are repaid~~inventory, orall ~~upon exercise~~ of the ~~warrants.~~proceeds ~~The~~and ~~valuation~~ products of the ~~warrants was~~foregoing determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 35.85-43.36% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.56-1.75% and ~~expected term of 3.95-4.6 years. During~~ the ~~nine months ended June 30, 2014, the~~ Company’s ~~amortized~~equity ~~$147,521~~interests ofin the ofother ~~debt discount~~Borrowers.

The following officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company participated as Affiliate Lenders:

Name	Commitment		Amount Funded as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014		Aggregate Number of Warrants Issuable		Warrants Issued as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014
The Estate of Gene Mulvihill(1)	$	500,000	$	~~413~~500,~~103~~000		~~100~~232,~~000~~561		82232,~~621~~561
Sunset Marathon Partners LLC(2)	$	250,000	$	~~206~~250,~~551~~000		50116,~~000~~281		41116,~~311~~281
MRP Holdings LLC(3)	$	~~200~~400,000	$	~~165~~200,~~239~~000		40116,~~000~~047		3393,~~047~~027
David Koffman and Burton I. Koffman(4)	$	750,000	$	619,955		150,000		123,932
Burton I. Koffman and David Koffman(4)	$	750,000	$	750,000		371,969		371,969
Anthony P. Miele III(5)	$	25,000	$	2025,~~654~~000		511,~~000~~631		411,~~132~~631
Alexandria Equities, LLC(6)	$	~~200~~700,000	$	~~165~~200,~~236~~000		40325,~~000~~582		3393,~~049~~026
Albert Behler(7)	$	~~200~~400,000	$	~~165~~200,~~236~~000		40116,~~000~~047		3393,~~049~~026
Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC(8)	$	1,000,000	$	-		465,117		-

(1)

(5)

Anthony P. Miele, III is a director of the Company.

(6) Alexandria Equities, LLC iswas a principal stockholder of the Company at the time we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement.

(7) Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.

	(7)	Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.

	(8)	Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC, is managed by Peter Mulvihill, brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL PERIOD FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2014 ~~COMPARED~~ COMPARED WITH ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2013.

Revenues were $41,~~838~~688,~~820~~112 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014, compared with $~~564~~1,~~236~~040,628 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2013. The increase was attributable to work performed on atwo RoboticValet ~~project~~ ~~that commenced in June 2013~~projects.

Cost of goods sold were $61,~~653~~576,~~633~~634 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, compared with $~~423~~1,~~655~~390,553 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2013. The increase for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June 30~~December 31, 2014, was attributable to work performed on ~~the~~two RoboticValet ~~project~~projects. ~~that~~The ~~commenced~~Company inrecognized ~~June~~a ~~2013.~~gross ~~Cost~~ profit of ~~goods~~$111,478 ~~sold~~and ~~exceeded~~a gross ~~revenues~~ ~~due~~loss toof ~~increased~~($349,925) ~~labor~~for the quarters ended December 31, ~~travel~~2014 and ~~software~~December ~~costs~~31, ~~associated~~2013, ~~with~~respectively, ~~the~~for ~~RoboticValet~~an increase ~~system~~of $461,403.

Sales and marketing expenses were $~~531~~160,~~719~~091 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, compared with $~~799~~170,~~034~~306 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June 30~~December 31, 2013, for a decrease of $~~267~~10,~~315~~215. The decrease was due to reduced spending of approximately $~~135~~23,000 onin ~~marketing~~salary ~~and~~related ~~tradeshows~~expense offset ~~and~~by aan ~~reduction~~increase ~~of approximately $150,000~~ in ~~salary~~marketing ~~related~~and ~~expense~~tradeshows ~~from~~of ~~the~~approximately ~~2013 period~~$13,000. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, the Company employed two full-time sales persons ~~compared to four full-time salespersons and one full-time support person as of June 30, 2013~~. Salespersons’ salaries are recorded under sales and marketing expense.

General and administrative expenses were $21,~~683~~277,~~412~~858 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, compared with $3821,~~339,865~~544 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2013, for aan ~~decrease~~ increase of $~~656~~456,~~453~~314. ~~This~~ ~~decrease~~Professional ~~was~~fees ~~primarily~~increased ~~due~~by ~~to reductions of~~ approximately $~~503~~90,000 indue ~~salary~~to ~~related~~the legal expenses associated with the Crescent Heights arbitration, outside labor increased by $20300,000 inas ~~rent~~the ~~expense~~Company increased the use of consultants and stock-based compensation increased by approximately $8771,000 ~~in travel expenses~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014.

~~Research~~Arbitration ~~and~~settlement ~~development~~charges ~~expenses~~ were $841,~~234~~372,887 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, compared with $~~2,125,657~~0 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2013~~, for a decrease of $2,041,423~~. ~~The~~ ~~decrease~~This increase was due to ~~less~~an interim ~~research~~arbitration ~~and~~award ~~development~~related ~~projects~~to ~~undertaken during~~ the ~~nine~~litigation ~~months~~with ~~ended~~Crescent ~~June 30, 2014~~Heights.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $219,454 during the nine months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $305,451 during the nine months ended June 30, 2013, for a decrease of $85,997. This decrease was the result of older assets becoming fully depreciated and the sale of certain fixed assets in July 2013.

Interest expense was $1,505,619 during the nine months ended June 30, 2014, compared with $930,460 during the nine months ended June 30, 2013, for an increase of $575,159. This increase is due to an increase in indebtedness through borrowings under the Loan Agreement.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the 2011 Warrants. In addition, the Placement Agent Warrants were deemed not indexed to the Company’s common stock and accordingly the Company recorded a derivative liability. The derivative liability is required to be revalued at each interim and annual reporting date until such time that it is settled. This revaluation resulted in a gain on fair value of derivative of $11,058,653 during the nine months ended June 30, 2014. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 (see Notes 2 and 7 to the Financial Statements). With respect to the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the warrants issued in connection with each offering. In addition, the placement agent was granted warrants similar in their terms to those issued to the debt holders. The Company has determined that the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering are indexed to the Company’s common stock and has not recorded a derivative liability. The Company also recorded a discount for the warrants issued in connection with each draw down of the June 2013 Loan Agreement. During the nine months ended June 30, 2014 the Company amortized an aggregate of $2,969,145 of the debt discount for the 2011 Offering, the 2012 Offering, December 2012 Offering and June 2013 Loan Agreement.

~~FISCAL~~Research ~~PERIOD~~and ~~FOR~~development ~~THE~~expenses ~~THREE~~were ~~MONTHS~~$14,496 ~~ENDED~~during ~~JUNE~~the 30three months ended December 31, 2014, ~~COMPARED WITH~~compared ~~THREE~~with ~~MONTHS~~$47,797 ~~ENDED~~during ~~JUNE~~the 30three months ended December 31, 2013, for a decrease of $33,301. The decrease was due to less research and development projects undertaken during the three months ended December 31, 2014.

~~Revenues~~Depreciation and amortization expenses were $163,~~501,957~~557 ~~for~~ during the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, compared ~~with~~to $~~275~~73,~~002~~249 ~~for~~during the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2013~~. The~~, ~~increase~~for ~~was~~a ~~attributable~~decrease of to$9,692. ~~work~~This ondecrease awas ~~RoboticValet project~~the ~~that~~result ~~commenced~~of inolder ~~June~~assets ~~2013~~becoming fully depreciated.

~~Cost~~Interest ofexpense ~~goods~~was ~~sold were~~ $2397,~~742,726~~298 ~~for~~during the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, compared with $~~261~~474,~~371~~820 ~~for~~during the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2013~~. The~~, ~~increase~~ for ~~the~~a ~~three~~decrease ~~months~~of ~~ended June 30~~$77,522. ~~2014,~~This ~~was~~decrease is ~~attributable~~due to ~~work on~~ the ~~RoboticValet~~elimination ~~project~~of ~~that commenced in June 2013~~$20.5 ~~Cost~~million of ~~goods~~convertible ~~sold~~debt ~~exceeded~~in ~~gross revenues due to increased labor, travel and software costs associated with~~ the ~~RoboticValet~~Exchange ~~system~~Offer.

~~Sales~~In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and ~~marketing~~the ~~expenses~~2011 ~~were~~Warrants. ~~$184~~In addition,~~572~~ ~~during~~the Placement Agent Warrants were deemed not indexed to the ~~three~~Company’s ~~months~~common ~~ended~~stock ~~June~~and ~~30,~~accordingly ~~2014,~~the ~~compared~~Company ~~with~~recorded a derivative liability. The derivative liability is required to be revalued at each interim and annual reporting date until such time that it is settled. This revaluation resulted in a gain on fair value of derivative of $~~218~~621,~~553~~581 during the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, ~~2013,~~2014. ~~for~~Substantially aall ~~decrease~~ of ~~$33,981.~~the ~~The~~increase in the gain on the ~~decrease~~fair value of the derivative was due to ~~reduced~~the ~~spending~~reduction of ~~approximately~~the ~~$35,000~~principal onamount ~~marketing~~of ~~and~~the ~~tradeshows~~convertible ~~and~~notes as a ~~reduction~~result of ~~approximately~~the ~~$40~~Exchange Offer. With respect to the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering,~~000~~ the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the warrants issued in ~~salary~~connection ~~related~~with ~~expense~~each offering. ~~This~~In addition, the placement agent was ~~offset~~granted bywarrants ~~increases~~similar in ~~travel~~their ~~expense~~terms ofto ~~approximately~~those issued ~~$15,000~~to the debt holders. AsThe ofCompany ~~March~~has ~~31,~~determined ~~2014,~~that the ~~Company~~ ~~employed~~2012 ~~two~~Offering ~~full-time~~and ~~sales~~the ~~persons~~December ~~compared~~2012 Offering are indexed to ~~four~~the Company’s ~~full-time~~common ~~salespersons~~stock and ~~one~~has ~~full-time~~not ~~support~~recorded ~~person~~a asderivative liability. The Company also recorded a discount for the warrants issued in connection with each draw down of the June ~~30,~~ 2013 Loan Agreement. ~~Salespersons’~~During ~~salaries~~the ~~are~~three ~~recorded~~months ~~under~~ended ~~sales~~December 31, 2014 the Company amortized an aggregate of $475,743 of the debt discount for the 2011 Offering, the 2012 Offering, December 2012 Offering and ~~marketing~~June ~~expense~~2013 Loan Agreement.

General and administrative expenses were $986,569 during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with $1,080,432 during the three months ended June 30, 2013, for a decrease of $93,863. This decrease was due to reductions of approximately $68,000 in salary related expenses and $23,000 in rent expense. Also, in the period ended June 30, 2013, cessation of work under the Crescent Heights contract resulted in a reversal of warranty expenses of approximately $349,000, offset by an increase of approximately $483,000 in bad debt expense, compared to warranty expenses of approximately $7,000 and bad debt expense of $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Research and development expenses were $10,109 during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with $500,930 during the three months ended June 30, 2013, for a decrease of $490,821. The decrease was due to less research and development projects undertaken during the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $72,788 during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $106,209 during the three months ended June 30, 2013, for a decrease of $33,421. This decrease was the result of older assets becoming fully depreciated and the sale of certain fixed assets in July 2013.

Interest expense was $536,884 during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with $338,523 during the three months ended June 30, 2013, for an increase of $198,361. This increase is due to an increase in indebtedness through borrowings under the Loan Agreement and the issuance of the December 2012 Notes.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the 2011 Warrants. In addition, the Placement Agent Warrants were deemed not indexed to the Company’s common stock and accordingly the Company recorded a derivative liability. The derivative liability is required to be revalued at each interim and annual reporting date until such time that it is settled. This revaluation resulted in a loss on fair value of derivative of $10,750 during the three months ended June 30, 2014. With respect to the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the warrants issued in connection with each offerings. In addition, the placement agent was granted warrants similar in their terms to those issued to the debt holders. The Company has determined that the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering are indexed to the Company’s common stock and has not recorded a derivative liability. The Company also recorded a discount for the warrants issued in connection with each draw down of the June 2013 Loan Agreement. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company amortized an aggregate of $996,136 of the debt discount for the 2011 Offering, the 2012 Offering, December 2012 Offering and June 2013 Loan Agreement.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our ~~financial~~ financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES:

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates we use to prepare the consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experiences and assumptions believed to be reasonable under current facts and circumstances. Actual amounts and results could differ from these estimates made by management.

The Company has identified the accounting policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.

Principles of consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boomerang Systems, Inc. and the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents- For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts – Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. We determine this allowance based on known troubled accounts, history and other currently available evidence. WeThe ~~have no~~ allowance for doubtful accounts ~~for~~as ~~the~~of ~~periods~~December ~~ending June 30~~31, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013,~~2014 ~~respectively~~was $17,500.

Property and equipment – Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives which range from three years to fifteen years. Depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $219,454 and $305,451, respectively.26

~~Research~~Property and ~~development~~equipment – ~~Pursuant~~Property, toplant and ~~ASC~~equipment ~~730, Research~~are ~~and~~stated ~~Development,~~at ~~research~~cost. Maintenance and ~~development~~repairs ~~costs~~ are ~~expensed~~charged to expense as incurred. ~~Research~~Costs of major additions and ~~Development~~betterments are ~~expense~~capitalized. ~~for~~Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives which range from three years to fifteen years. Depreciation and amortization for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013 ~~were~~was $8463,~~234~~557 and $273,~~125~~249,~~657,~~ respectively.

Research and development – Pursuant to ASC 730, Research and Development, research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and Development expense for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $14,496 and $47,797, respectively.

Inventories - Inventories consisting of parts, materials, and assemblies are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method.

Stock-based compensation - We adopted ASC 718-10-25, using the modified-prospective-transition method on February 7, 2008. Under this method, we are required to recognize compensation cost for stock-based compensation arrangements with employees and directors based on their grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, such cost to be expensed over the compensations’ respective vesting periods. For awards with graded vesting, in which portions of the award vest in different periods, we recognize compensation costs over the vesting periods using the straight-line method. For calculating the value for warrants, the Black-Scholes method is also used.

Inherent in determining the fair value of options are several judgments and estimates that must be made. These include determining the underlying valuation methodology for share compensation awards and the related inputs utilized in each valuation, such as our expected stock price volatility, expected term of the options granted to employees and consultants, expected dividend yield, the expected risk-free interest rate, the underlying stock price and the exercise price of the option. Changes to these assumptions could result in different valuations for individual share awards. The company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted to employees, non-employee directors and non-employee consultants.

Revenue recognition – Revenues from the sales of RoboticValet and rack and rail systems will be recognized using the percentage of completion method, whereby revenue and the related gross profit is determined by comparing the actual costs incurred to date for the project to the total estimated project costs at completion.

Project costs generally include all material and shipping costs, our direct labor, subcontractor costs and an allocation of indirect costs related to the direct labor. Changes in the project scope, site conditions, staff performance and delays or problems with the equipment used on the project can result in increased costs that may not be billable or accepted by the customer and a loss or lower profit from what was originally anticipated at the time of the proposal.

When the current estimate of total contract costs exceeds the current estimate of total contract revenues, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is made. Losses are recognized in the period in which they become evident under the percentage-of-completion method. The loss is computed on the basis of the total estimated costs to complete the contract, including the contract costs incurred to date plus the estimated costs to complete. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014, it was estimated that the gross loss on current contracts would be $13,~~922~~383,~~833~~725. This ~~loss~~ loss is comprised of $13,~~756~~146,~~108~~045 recognized through the percentage of completion method and $~~166~~237,~~725~~680 as a provision for the remaining loss on contracts for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014. Revenues of $41,~~838~~688,~~820~~112 and $~~564~~1,~~236~~040,628 have been recognized for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Warranty Reserves - The Company provides warranty coverage on its products for a specified time as stipulated in its sales contracts. As revenues for contracts are recognized, the Company will record a warranty reserve for estimated costs in connection with future warranty claims associated with those contracts. The amount of warranty reserve is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty and historical costs to service warranty claims. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the reserves based on these factors and adjusts the reserve accordingly. The Company incurred warranty expenses relating to its completed projects of $~~4,893~~0 and $010,157 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June 30~~December, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Earnings Per Common Share - We adopted ASC 260. The statement established standards for computing and presenting earnings per share (“EPS”). It replaced the presentation of primary EPS with a basic EPS and also requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding.

Investment at Equity - The Company accounts for the equity investment using the equity method unless its value has been determined to be other than temporarily impaired, in which case we write the investment down to its impaired value. The Company reviews this investment periodically for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying value when other-than-temporary decline is evident; however, for non-marketable equity securities, the impairment analysis requires significant judgment. During its review, the Company evaluates the financial condition of the issuer, market conditions, and other factors providing an indication of the fair value of the investment. Adverse changes in market conditions or operating results of the issuer that differ from expectation could result in additional other-than-temporary losses in future periods.

Income Taxes - We account for income taxes under ASC 740-10. ASC 740-10 requires an asset and liability approach for financial reporting for income taxes. Under ASC 740-10, deferred taxes are provided for temporary differences between the carrying values of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes at the enacted rates at which these differences are expected to reverse. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return.

Use of Estimates - Management of the Company has made estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, warranty expense, income taxes and percentage of completion contracts. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We review the long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. To determine if impairment exists, we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from the related long-lived assets to the net carrying amount of such assets. Once it has been determined that an impairment exists, the carrying value of the asset is adjusted to the fair value. Factors considered in the determination of the fair value include current operating results, trends and the present value of estimated expected future cash flows.

28Derivative liability - The Company accounts for reset provisions in connection with their issuance of debt, and reset provisions of equity instruments attached to their debt, in accordance with ASC 815 which defines determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is solely indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. The derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value at the end of each reporting period as long as they are outstanding.

Derivative liability - The Company accounts for reset provisions in connection with their issuance of debt, and reset provisions of equity instruments attached to their debt, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Consensus No. 07-5 “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (EITF 07-5”). Under EITF 07-5, instruments which contain full ratchet anti-dilution provisions are no longer considered indexed to a company’s own stock for purposes of determining whether it meets the first part of the scope exception in paragraph 11 (a) of FASB 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, now promulgated in ASC 815, “Derivative and Hedging”. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions.

Fair Value Measurements - As defined in ASC Topic 820 – 10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 – 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1996

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are largely based on our current expectations and projections about future events and conditions affecting our business, the markets for our products and customer acceptance of our products and conditions in the construction industry. Such forward-looking statements include, in particular, projections about our future results included in our Exchange Act reports, statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business and the markets in which we operate and intend to operate. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “believes”, “can”, “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “projects”, “targets”, “will”, “anticipates”, and similar expressions or variations of these terms and similar phrases. Comments about our critical need for additional capital and our ability to raise such capital when and as needed and on acceptable terms are forward-looking statements. Additionally, statements concerning future matters such as the costs and expenses we expect to incur, our ability to realize material revenues, delays we may encounter in selling our products and gaining market acceptance for our products, the cost of the further development of our products, and achieving enhancements or improved technologies, achieving material sales levels, marketing expenses, projected cash flows, our intentions regarding raising additional capital and when additional capital may be required, and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements. Management cautions that these forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and are subject to business, economic, and other risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of our business or our industry to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation those discussed under Item 1A - Risk Factors on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The cautionary statements should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Form 10-Q and they should also be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including the related footnotes.

Neither management nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and subsequent facts or circumstances may contradict, obviate, undermine, or otherwise fail to support or substantiate such statements. We caution you not to rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business that are addressed in this Form 10-Q. Certain information included in this Form 10-Q may supersede or supplement forward-looking statements in our other Exchange Act reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by applicable law or regulation.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a Smaller Reporting Company, no response is required to this Item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Company's principal executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure due to our inability to record, process, summarize and report within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. ~~We plan on taking measures to educate appropriate staff as to the reporting requirements and implement a process by which management is alerted to events requiring disclosure.~~

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer also conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting (“Internal Control”) to determine whether any changes in Internal Control occurred during the quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to materially affect Internal Control. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company conducts periodic evaluations to enhance, where necessary its procedures and controls.

3029

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On March 15, 2013, Crescent Heights R&D, LLC (“Crescent Heights”), filed a complaint against Boomerang in the State of Florida for fraud, breach of contract and specific performance, as well as equitable rescission which alleged an unspecified amount of damages in excess of the purchase price. Boomerang was subsequently granted a motion to remove this matter to federal court. On May 17, 2013, the court entered an order that our motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings be granted. The parties ~~have~~ agreed to arbitrate the matter in front of the American ~~Arbitration~~ Arbitration Association. ~~An arbitrator has been selected and an arbitration hearing will take place~~ in November 2014. The ~~parties are presently conducting discovery in preparation for arbitration. The~~ dispute arises from a contract to provide a rack and rail automated parking system. Crescent Heights’ claims, Boomerang’s defenses and Boomerang’s affirmative claims all arise from the contract. ~~Due~~On toJanuary 23, 2015, the ~~ongoing~~arbitrator ~~arbitration~~issued ~~with~~an Interim Arbitration Award. The arbitrator denied Crescent Heights’ claims of fraud in the inducement, equitable rescission based on fraud, and declaratory relief to strike the limitation of liability clause, but found Boomerang ~~has~~in ~~eliminated~~breach of contract. Crescent Heights was awarded damages of $1,197,887, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. We expect the ~~warranty~~Arbitrator to issue a final arbitration award in April 2015, which will include the attorney’s fees and costs payable by Boomerang. Boomerang established a reserve of $1,372,887 for the amount ~~associated~~of ~~with~~the ~~this~~award, ~~project~~plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

In addition to the above, we may from time to time become involved in litigation relating to claims arising from the ordinary course of business. These claims, even if not meritous, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On ~~May~~October 199, ~~and~~2014, ~~June~~October 2416, 2014 and November 18, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of ~~200~~634,~~012~~508 shares of common stock in connection with a draw ~~down~~ of $1,~~000~~364,~~000~~ 460 under the Loan and Security Agreement.

On ~~June~~October 3031, 2014, pursuant to the ~~Company~~Exchange Offer, the Company issued an aggregate of ~~140~~9,~~639~~583,384 shares of common stock at $2.15 per share, in exchange for outstanding convertible notes and warrants. Included in the Exchange Offer was the issuance of 48,674 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $~~312~~104,~~634~~ 463 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $21.2258 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

On November 17, 2014, the Company issued options to purchase 471,719 shares of common stock of the Company to Mark Patterson, former Chief Executive Officer, and options to purchase 176,894 shares of common stock of the Company to Christopher Mulvihill, President. The options were issued in exchange for an aggregate of $459,643 of deferred compensation.

On November 17, 2014, the Company granted options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company to the former Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

On December 31, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,815 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $6,050 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

The securities sold described above were sold upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, upon reliance on Section 4(2) thereof and/or regulation D promulgated thereunder. No underwriters were employed in any of these transactions. Each of the certificates issued bears or will bear a legend stating that resale of the shares, including shares to be issued on exercise of options and warrants, is restricted without compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act or the availability of an exemption from such registration requirements and stop transfer instructions have been or will be placed with the transfer agent with respect to the transfer of the shares issued.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

~~On August 8, 2014, David Koch resigned as the Chief Operating Officer of Boomerang.~~None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number		Description

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)

101 The following materials from Boomerang Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Unaudited, Consolidated Statements of Operations for the ~~Nine and~~ Three Months Ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, (ii) Unaudited, ~~Consolidated~~ Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and September 30, ~~2013~~2014, (iii) Unaudited, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three ~~Nine~~ Months Ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2014 and 2013, and (iv) Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements.*

*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files included in Exhibit 101 are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.31

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC.
Dated: August 14, 2014	By: /s/ Mark R. Patterson
Dated: February 17, 2015	By:	/s/ James V. Gelly
	Mark R. Patterson
	James V. Gelly
	Principal Executive Officer
Dated: August 14, 2014	By: /s/ Scott Shepherd
Dated: February 17, 2015	By:	/s/ Scott Shepherd
	Scott Shepherd
	Principal Financial Officer
	and Principal Accounting Officer

3332

Filing Compare · Boomerang Systems, Inc.