UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~ 2015

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________to______________

Commission File Number 0-10176

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		22-2306487
(State or other jurisdiction		(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)

30 A Vreeland Rd
Florham Park, New Jersey		07932
(Address of principal executive offices)		(zip code)

(973) 538-1194

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 18,~~231~~233,~~222~~977 as of ~~February~~May 1714, 2015

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
Consolidated Statements of Operations	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7-20
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21-29
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	29
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures	29
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings	30
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors	30
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30-31
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	31
ITEM 5. Other Information	31
ITEM 6. Exhibits	31

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Balance Sheets		4

Consolidated Statements of Operations		5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7-21

ITEM 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22-30

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	31

ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	31

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	32

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	32

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32

ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	33

ITEM 5.	Other Information	33

ITEM 6.	Exhibits	33

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			September 30,
	March 31,			September 30,
	2014			2014
	2015			2014
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~965~~1,~~956~~895,130		$	958,877
Accounts receivable, net		~~299~~237,~~910~~915			862,794
Retainage receivable		~~451~~589,~~721~~889			367,706
Inventory		~~748~~1,~~770~~047,813			691,044
Prepaid expenses and other assets		~~160~~126,~~186~~010			20,800
Total current assets		23,~~626~~896,~~543~~757			2,901,221
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,~~126~~068,~~796~~153			2,179,521
Other assets:
Security deposit		2043,~~825~~434			20,825
Total other assets		2043,~~825~~434			20,825
Total assets	$	46,~~774~~008,~~164~~344		$	5,101,567
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	5,~~032~~554,~~382~~175		$	3,751,600
Due to related party		~~573,982~~-			529,830
Deposit payable		~~280~~305,000			155,000
Billings in excesss of costs and estimated earned profits on uncompleted contracts		23,~~993~~829,~~132~~843			3,688,059
Estimated loss on uncompleted contract		~~237~~111,~~680~~343			337,189
Debt- current portion		80,538			89,562
Total current liabilities		9,~~197~~880,~~714~~899			8,551,240
Long term liabilities:
Debt- long term, net of discount		56,~~187~~548,~~525~~211			10,869,318
Debt- long term- related party, net of discount		12,~~821~~960,~~790~~246			7,525,184
Derivative liability		37120,~~435~~120			659,016
Total long term liabilities		79,~~046~~628,~~750~~577			19,053,518
Total liabilities		1619,~~244~~509,~~464~~476			27,604,758
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares 1,000,000; 0 shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized shares 200,000,000 18,231,222 and 8,645,023 issued and outstanding		18,231			8,645
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized shares 200,000,000 18,233,977 and 8,645,023 issued and outstanding		18,234			8,645
Additional paid in capital		85,~~019~~782,~~795~~745			61,617,019
Accumulated deficit		(9699,~~508~~302,~~326~~111	)		(84,128,855	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(1113,~~470~~501,~~300~~132	)		(22,503,191	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	46,~~774~~008,~~164~~344		$	5,101,567

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013

(UNAUDITED)

	2014			2013
	Six Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
Revenues:
	2015			2014			2015			2014
System sales	$	1,688,112		$	1,040,628
Revenues:
Total revenues		1,688,112			1,040,628
System sales	$	2,350,727		$	3,336,863			662,615		$	2,296,235
Cost of goods sold		1,576,634			1,390,553
Total revenues		2,350,727			3,336,863			662,615			2,296,235
Gross profit (loss)		111,478			(349,925	)
Cost of goods sold		2,473,353			3,910,907			896,719			2,520,354
Expenses:
Gross (loss)		(122,626	)		(574,044	)		(234,104	)		(224,119	)
Sales and marketing		160,091			170,306
Expenses:
General and administrative expenses		1,277,858			821,544
Sales and marketing		281,501			347,147			121,410			176,841
Arbitration settlement charge		1,372,887			-
General and administrative expenses		2,768,547			1,696,842			1,490,689			875,298
Research and development		14,496			47,797
Arbitration settlement charge		1,517,810			-			144,923			-
Depreciation and amortization		63,557			73,249
Research and development		14,505			74,125			9			26,328
Total expenses		2,888,889			1,112,896
Depreciation and amortization		117,185			146,666			53,628			73,417
Loss from operations		(2,777,411	)		(1,462,821	)
Total expenses		4,699,548			2,264,780			1,810,659			1,151,884
Other income (expenses):
Loss from operations		(4,822,174	)		(2,838,824	)		(2,044,763	)		(1,376,003	)
Interest income		126			302
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense		(397,298	)		(474,820	)
Interest income		-			492			(126	)		190
Debt conversion expense		(9,350,726	)		-
Interest expense		(762,055	)		(968,735	)		(364,757	)		(493,915	)
Amortization of discount on debt		(475,743	)		(978,167	)
Debt conversion expense		(9,350,726	)		-			-			-
Gain on fair value of derivative		621,581			1,072,946
Other income		31,344			-			31,344			-
Total other income (expenses)		(9,602,060	)		(379,739	)
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		(47,056	)		-			(47,056	)		-
Loss before provision for income taxes		(12,379,471	)		(1,842,560	)
Amortization of discount on debt		(759,551	)		(1,973,009	)		(283,808	)		(994,843	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Gain/(loss) on fair value of derivative		538,896			11,069,403			(82,685	)		9,996,457
Net loss	$	(12,379,471	)	$	(1,842,560	)
Total other income (expenses)		(10,349,148	)		8,128,151			(747,088	)		8,507,889
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(1.04	)	$	(0.23	)
(Loss)/gain before provision for income taxes		(15,171,322	)		5,289,327			(2,791,851	)		7,131,886
Weighted average number of shares - basic and diluted		11,874,237			8,026,434
Provision for income taxes		1,934			5,696			1,934			5,696
Net (loss)/income	$	(15,173,256	)	$	5,283,631		$	(2,793,785	)	$	7,126,190
Net (loss)/income per common share - basic	$	(0.91	)	$	0.65		$	(0.15	)	$	0.87
Weighted average number of shares - basic		16,650,151			8,125,029			18,231,253			8,225,816
Net (loss)/income per common share - diluted	$	(0.91	)	$	0.16		$	(0.15	)	$	0.26
Weighted average number of shares - diluted		16,650,151			12,930,199			18,231,253			13,148,569

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE ~~THREE~~SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014 AND~~2015 ~~2013~~AND 2014

(UNAUDITED)

	2014			2013
	2015			2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1215,~~379~~173,~~471~~256	)	$	(15,~~842~~283,~~560~~631	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss operations to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss operations to
Depreciation and amortization		63,557			73,249
net cash (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		117,185			146,666
Debt conversion expense		9,350,726			-
Grant of options for services		~~725~~858,~~733~~968			-171,479
Issuance of common stock for interest expense		~~110~~116,~~513~~431			~~316~~625,~~069~~267
(Gain) on fair value of derivative		(621,581	)		(1,072,946	)
Rent concession		65,152			-
Amortization of discount on debt		475,743			978,167
(Gain) on fair value of derivative		(538,896	)		(11,069,403	)
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		47,056			-
Amortization of discount on debt		759,551			1,973,009
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accounts receivable		562,884			5,392
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable		624,879			(744,608	)
(Increase) in retainage receivable		(84222,~~015~~183	)		-
Decrease in costs and estimated earned profits in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		-			380,630
Decrease in costs and estimated earned profits in excess of
(Increase) in inventory		(57,726	)		(1,853,057	)
billings on uncompleted contracts		-			380,630
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets		(139,386	)		(157,084	)
(Increase) in inventory		(356,769	)		(1,418,753	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,280,782			627,322
(Increase)/decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		(127,819	)		62,098
Increase in due to related party		44,152			44,152
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,802,574			301,134
Increase in deposit payable		125,000			230,000
Increase in due to related party		44,153			88,305
(Decrease)/increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earned profits on uncompleted contracts		(694,927	)		966,396
Increase in deposit payable		150,000			5,000
(Decrease)/increase in estimated loss on uncompleted contract		(99,509	)		220,371
Increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earned
NET CASH (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(1,337,525	)		(1,083,899	)
profits on uncompleted contracts		141,784			2,094,260
(Decrease)/increase in estimated loss on uncompleted contract		(225,846	)		121,618
NET CASH (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(2,566,310	)		(1,979,667	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(1055,~~832~~473	)		-(6,575	)
NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(10,832	)		-
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		2,600			-
NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(52,873	)		(6,575	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of notes payable		(9,024	)		(714,~~647~~911	)
Proceeds from notes payable and line of credit		13,~~364~~564,460			12,452,207
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		13,~~355~~555,436			12,~~444~~437,~~560~~296
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		7936,~~079~~253			~~360~~451,~~661~~054
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - beginning of period		958,877			636,940
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - end of period	$	~~965~~1,~~956~~895,130		$	~~997~~1,~~601~~087,994
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	5,594		$	3,110
Income taxes	$	1,934		$	5,594
Non-cash investing and financing activites:
Issuance of common stock for interest expense	$	~~110~~116,~~513~~431		$	~~316~~625,~~069~~267
Debt conversion expense	$	9,350,726		$	-
Capital Contribution:
Issuance of promissory note to related party	$	(500,000	)	$	-
Capital contribution		(73,982	)		-
Decrease in due to related party		573,982			-
	$	-		$	-
Rent concession	$	65,152		$	-
Capital contribution		(65,152	)		-
	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The Company

Our company, Boomerang Systems, Inc, is engaged in the business of marketing, designing, engineering, manufacturing, installing and servicing its RoboticValet® automated parking systems (“APS”), with corporate and sales offices in Florham Park, New Jersey, aoffices ~~demonstration facility~~ in ~~Hamburg~~Logan, ~~New Jersey~~Utah, and a research, design, engineering, production and testing center in ~~Logan~~Fort Pierce, ~~Utah~~Florida.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us,” means Boomerang Systems, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Our fiscal year end is September 30^th. We define fiscal year 2015 as the twelve month period ended September 30, 2015.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014 and filed with the SEC on December 29, 2014. There have been no changes in significant accounting policies since September 30, 2014.

At the present time, we believe our working capital together with the available borrowings under our Loan and Security Agreement (defined below) and the expected cash flow from ongoing projects will be sufficient to support our administrative requirements and existing projects until ~~March~~June, 2016. To implement our full business plan, we will require additional funds, and are now seeking to raise these funds through public or private debt or equity offerings, including offerings to our existing security holders. In December 2014, we obtained an additional $7,050,000 of commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement to increase the aggregate amount of commitments from $7,850,000 to $14,900,000. There can be no assurance that the capital we require to meet our operating needs will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unsuccessful in raising sufficient capital, we may be required to curtail our operations and could default on our existing indebtedness. The unaudited, condensed financial statements included in this report do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from the sales of RoboticValet and rack and rail systems are recognized using the percentage of completion method, whereby revenue and the related gross profit is determined by comparing the actual costs incurred to date for the project to the total estimated project costs at completion.

Project costs generally include all material and shipping costs, our direct labor, subcontractor costs and an allocation of indirect costs related to the direct labor. Changes in the project scope, site conditions, staff performance and delays or problems with the equipment used on the project can result in changes to costs that may or may not be billable to the customer and can result in changes to the project profit.

Estimates for the costs to complete the project are periodically updated by management during the performance of the project. Provisions for changes in estimated costs and losses, if any, on uncompleted projects are made in the period in which such losses are determined.

When the current estimate of total contract costs exceeds the current estimate of total contract revenues, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is made. Losses are recognized in the period in which they become evident under the percentage-of-completion method. The loss is computed on the basis of the total estimated costs to complete the contract, including the contract costs incurred to date plus the estimated costs to complete. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, weone of our three ongoing projects was estimated ~~that~~to ~~the~~have a gross loss. On this onproject, ~~current~~we ~~contracts~~estimated that the total gross loss would be $3,~~383~~558,~~725~~782. This loss is comprised of $3,~~146~~447,~~045~~439 recognized through the percentage of completion method and $~~237~~111,~~680~~343 as a provision for the remaining loss on ~~contracts~~contract.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

Revenues of $12,~~688~~350,~~112~~727 and $13,~~040~~336,~~628~~863 have been recognized for the six months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and of $662,615 and $2,296,235 for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

The Company also engages in engineering and design contracts. Revenue is recognized on these contracts after the services are delivered to the customer.

The Company may have service contracts in the future after the contract warranty period is expired, which are separate and distinct agreements from project agreements and will be billed according to the terms of the contract.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boomerang Systems, Inc. and the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, including Boomerang Sub, Inc., Boomerang USA Corp. and Boomerang MP Holdings, Inc. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Earnings per Common Share

~~The~~Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding. The weighted average number of common shares used to calculate basic ~~and diluted~~ income/(loss) per common share for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 were 1116,~~874~~650,~~237~~151 and 8,~~026~~125,~~434~~029, respectively~~. The~~, ~~Company’s~~and ~~common~~for ~~stock~~the ~~equivalents,~~three ofmonths ~~outstanding~~ended ~~options~~March 31, ~~warrants~~2015 and ~~convertible~~2014 ~~notes~~were 18, ~~have~~231,253 ~~not~~and ~~been~~8,225,816, ~~included as to include them would be anti-dilutive~~respectively. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, there were fully vested options outstanding for the purchase of 12,~~737~~256,~~459~~125 and ~~623~~902,~~385~~010 common shares, warrants for the purchase of 89,~~262~~225,~~502~~920 and 10,~~400~~640,~~092~~051 common shares, and notes convertible into 127,090 and 4,~~836~~875,~~999~~209 common shares, respectively, all of which could potentially dilute future earnings per share.

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31						March 31
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Basic
Net Income (loss)	$	(15,173,256	)	$	5,283,631		$	(2,793,785	)	$	7,126,190
Weighted average shares outstanding		16,650,151			8,125,029			18,231,253			8,225,816
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock	$	(0.91	)	$	0.65		$	(0.15	)	$	0.87


Assuming Dilution
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(15,173,256	)	$	5,283,631		$	(2,793,785	)	$	7,126,190
Convertible note interest		-			625,267			-			316,069
Convertible note discount amortization		-			1,647,310			-			823,655
Change in fair value of convertible note BCF		-			(5,426,404	)		-			(4,900,428	)
Net Income (loss)	$	(15,173,256	)	$	2,129,804		$	(2,793,785	)	$	3,365,486

Average Shares
Weighted average shares outstanding		16,650,151			8,125,029			18,231,253			8,225,816
Dilutive securities issuable - stock plans		-			42,924			-			85,849
Dilutive securities issuable - convertible notes		-			4,762,246			-			4,836,924
Total weighted average shares outstanding		16,650,151			12,930,199			18,231,253			13,148,589
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock	$	(0.91	)	$	0.16		$	(0.15	)	$	0.26

The diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations exclude the effect of stock options and warrants when the options’ and warrants’ assumed proceeds exceed the average market price of the common shares during the period. For the six and three months ended March 31, 2014, the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computations were 257,385 and the weighted average number of warrants excluded from the computations were 10,640,051. For the six and three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company’s common stock equivalents, of outstanding options, warrants and convertible notes, have not been included as to include them would be anti-dilutive.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

Stock-Based Compensation

The analysis and computation was performed based on our adoption of ASC 718-10-25, which requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation. For the ~~three~~six months ended March ~~December~~ 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, we recognized $~~725~~858,~~733~~968 and $0171,479, respectively, in share-based payments related to the issuance of of stock options. and $136,235 and $171,479 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We recognized no expense related to the issuance of warrants during the six months or three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~2013~~2014.

Derivative liability

The Company accounts for reset provisions in connection with their issuance of debt, and reset provisions of equity instruments attached to their debt, in accordance with ASC 815. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. The derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value at the end of each reporting period as long as they are outstanding.

Fair Value Measurements

As defined in ASC Topic 820 – 10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 – 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1:

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2:

Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category includes those derivative instruments that the Company values using observable market data. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace throughout the term of the derivative instruments, can be derived from observable data, or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

Level 3:

Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). The Company’s valuation models are primarily industry standard models. Level 3 instruments include derivative warrant instruments. The Company does not have sufficient corroborating evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 1 or Level 2.

As required by ASC Topic 820 – 10, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The estimated fair value of the derivative liability was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company uses Level 3 inputs to value its derivative liabilities. The ~~following~~ following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the major classes of assets and liabilities ~~measured~~ measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and reflects gains and losses for the ~~three~~six months and one ~~year~~ year ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, for all financial assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3.

	December 31, 2014			September 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities:
Balance of derivative liabilities – beginning of period	$	659,016		$	11,767,504
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(621,581	)		(11,108,488	)
Balance of derivative liabilities – end of period	$	37,435		$	659,016

~~The~~BOOMERANG ~~Company incurred the derivative liability set forth on the December 31~~SYSTEMS, ~~2014~~INC. ~~balance~~AND ~~sheet in connection with the 2011 Offering (see Note 7).~~SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

	March 31, 2015			September 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities:
Balance of derivative liabilities – beginning of period	$	659,016		$	11,767,504
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(538,896	)		(11,108,488	)
Balance of derivative liabilities – end of period	$	120,120		$	659,016

The Company incurred the derivative liability set forth on the March 31, 2015 balance sheet in connection with the 2011 Offering (see Note 7).

Research and Development

Pursuant to ASC 730, Research and Development, research ~~and~~ and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and Development expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 were $14,~~496~~505 and $4774,~~797~~125, respectively, and $9 and $26,328 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Advertising

Advertising costs are included in Sales and Marketing and expensed as incurred. Advertising costs amounted to $20,~~377~~499 and $723,~~385~~446 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and ~~2013~~$162 and $16,061 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively.

Use of Estimates

Management of the Company has made estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, warranty expense, income taxes and percentage of completion contracts. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of probable credit losses inherent in our existing accounts receivable balance. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. We determine this allowance based on known troubled accounts, history and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of March ~~December~~ 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014 was $17,500.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

Retainage Receivable

The Company’s contracts for automated parking systems sometimes require a holdback of a percentage of the contract price as retainage. This holdback is recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as “Retainage receivable.” Retainage is a portion of the total price of a project that is held back by the customer until the project reaches certain milestones specified in the contract terms. Retainage percentages typically range from 0% to 10% and are usually collected anywhere from nine to eighteen months from the inception of the project. Retainage receivable at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014 was $~~451~~589,~~721~~889 and $367,706, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method. Inventory includes materials, parts, assemblies and work in process. The Company records an inventory reserve for the anticipated loss associated with slow moving, obsolete and/or damaged inventory.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives which range from three years to fifteen years. Depreciation and amortization for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 was $63117,~~557~~185 and $146,666, respectively, and $53,628 and $73,~~249~~417 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

Warranty Reserves

The Company provides warranty coverage on its products for a specified time as stipulated in its sales contracts. As revenues for contracts are recognized, the Company will record a warranty reserve for estimated costs in connection with future warranty claims associated with those contracts. The amount of ~~warranty~~ warranty reserve is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty and historical costs to service warranty claims. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the reserves based on these factors and adjusts the reserve accordingly. The Company had no warranty reserve as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard setting organizations and various regulatory agencies. Due to the tentative and preliminary nature of those proposed standards, management has not determined whether implementation of such proposed standards would be material to the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORY

The components of inventory as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014 were as follows:

	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)		September 30, 2014
	March 31, 2015 (Unaudited)		September 30, 2014
Parts, materials and assemblies	$	~~343~~550,~~635~~531	$	206,821
Work in-process		~~405~~497,~~135~~282		484,223
Total Inventory	$	~~748~~1,~~770~~047,813	$	691,044

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014:

	March 31, 2015			September 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)

Computer equipment	$	31,832		$	47,999
Machinery and equipment		87,961			235,367
Furniture and fixtures		78,378			141,003
Leasehold improvements		-			62,470
Leased Equipment		-			70,133
Buildings		2,598,470			2,598,470
		2,796,641			3,155,442
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(728,488	)		(975,921	)
	$	2,068,153		$	2,179,521

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2014
Computer equipment	$	47,999		$	47,999
Machinery and equipment		246,199			235,367
Furniture and fixtures		141,003			141,003
Leasehold improvements		62,470			62,470
Leased Equipment		70,133			70,133
Buildings		2,598,470			2,598,470
		3,166,274			3,155,442
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(1,039,478	)		(975,921	)
	$	2,126,796		$	2,179,521

NOTE 5 – BILLINGS IN EXCESS OF COSTS

Information with respect to uncompleted contracts at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~ 2015 and September 30, 2014 are as follows:

Billings in excess of costs:	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)			September 30, 2014
	March 31, 2015			September 30, 2014
Earnings on billings to date	$	9,107,109		$	7,583,997
Billings in excess of costs:	(Unaudited)
Less: Billings		(12,100,241	)		(11,272,056	)
Earnings on billings to date	$	9,652,371		$	7,583,997
Total (billings in excess of costs)	$	(2,993,132	)	$	(3,688,059	)
Less: Billings		(13,482,214	)		(11,272,056	)
Total (billings in excess of costs)	$	(3,829,843	)	$	(3,688,059	)

NOTE 6 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~September~~ September 30, 2014 consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)		September 30, 2014
	March 31, 2015		September 30, 2014
Accounts payable – trade	$	2,158,194	$	1,958,696
	(Unaudited)
Accrued interest		1,186,226		944,147
Accounts payable – trade	$	2,015,537	$	1,958,696
Accrued payroll		229,245		676,942
Accrued interest		1,544,013		944,147
Accrued arbitration settlement charge		1,372,887		-
Accrued payroll		390,957		676,942
Other accrued liabilities		85,830		171,815
Accrued arbitration settlement charge		1,517,810		-
Total	$	5,032,382	$	3,751,600
Other accrued liabilities		85,858		171,815
Total	$	5,554,175	$	3,751,600

NOTE 7- DEBT

Current Debt

Effective February 6, 2008, the Company became indebted for an ~~unsecured~~ unsecured loan to a third party. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the principal balance of this loan was $80,538. The loan is is not collateralized, bears interest at an annual rate of 10% and is due on demand. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the balance of the loan including accrued interest was $~~123~~126,~~031~~090.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

The Company entered into a twenty-four month capital lease secured by equipment with a third party commencing on January 1, 2013. The total principal balance of this lease was $315,000 at an annual rate of 6%. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the principal balance was paid down in full.

Long-Term Debt

Private Placement Offering – November/December 2011

In November and December 2011, the Company issued to subscribers 6% convertible promissory notes (“2011 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $11.6 million and warrants (“2011 Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of approximately 2.7 million shares of Common Stock of the Company in three (3) closings of a private placement (the “2011 Offering”). The 2011 Notes are due five years after the respective date of issuance and were initially convertible into Common Stock at $4.25 per share, subject to weighted average adjustment for issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions.

The Company valued the 2011 Warrants and the beneficial conversion features (“BCF”) of the 2011 Notes, and the resulting derivative liability, at $5,309,941 each for the 2011 Warrants and the BCF, for a total of $10,619,882 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This discount is being amortized over the life of the note or until such time as the note is repaid or converted, or upon exercise of of the 2011 Warrants. The valuation of the 2011 Warrants, BCF, and the resulting derivative liability, were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0%, ii) expected volatility of 52.7%, iii) risk free interest rate of 0.9%, and iv) expected term of 5 years. During the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company amortized $174,907 of the of debt discount. Following the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below), the remaining principal amount of 2011 Notes was $200,000 and the related discount to the convertible debt was $125,452. The Company amortized $612,~~273~~545 of the remaining debt discount during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

As of September 30, 2014, the aggregate fair value of the derivative was $646,120. The revaluation of the derivative as of December 31, 2014 resulted in a derivative value of $17,331. The change in fair value of the derivative from September 30, 2014 to December 31, 2014 resulted in a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of $628,789. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to the reduction of the principal amount of the convertible notes as a result of the Exchange Offer. The derivative liability was revalued on December 31, 2014 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 34.83% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.65%, iv) expected term of 1.85 years and v) market price of $2.15.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company issued warrants to the placement agent (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Company issued an aggregate of 109,176 Placement Agent Warrants in November and December 2011 valued at $212,040. The Placement Agent Warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering. The Placement Agent Warrants have similar terms to those issued to the convertible debt holders, including a reset provision included with the warrants if the Company should obtain equity financing at a price per share lower than that of the exercise price of the warrants. The Placement Agent Warrants, similar to the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering, do not meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a derivative liability for the value of the Placement Agent Warrants. The derivative liability valued at $12,896 at September 30, 2014 was revalued at $20,104 at December 31, 2014. The difference in valuation for the three months ended December 31, 2014 was $7,208, accounted for as a loss on the fair value of derivative. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The valuation at December 31, 2014 was valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants granted to the debt holders as of December 31, 2014.

As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the conversion price of the 2011 Notes was adjusted to $3.00.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

As of September 30, 2014, the aggregate fair value of the derivative was $646,120. The revaluation of the derivative as of March 31, 2015 resulted in a derivative value of $55,612. The change in fair value of the derivative from September 30, 2014 to March 31, 2015 resulted in a gain on the fair value of the derivative liability of $590,508. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to the reduction of the principal amount of the convertible notes as a result of the Exchange Offer. The derivative liability was revalued on March 31, 2015 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 32.12% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.37%, iv) expected term of 1.60 years and v) market price of $3.13.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company issued warrants to the placement agent (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Company issued an aggregate of 109,176 Placement Agent Warrants in November and December 2011 valued at $212,040. The Placement Agent Warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering. The Placement Agent Warrants have similar terms to those issued to the convertible debt holders, including a reset provision included with the warrants if the Company should obtain equity financing at a price per share lower than that of the exercise price of the warrants. The Placement Agent Warrants, similar to the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering, do not meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a derivative liability for the value of the Placement Agent Warrants. The derivative liability valued at $12,896 at September 30, 2014 was revalued at $64,508 at March 31, 2015. The difference in valuation for the six months ended March 31, 2014 was $51,612, accounted for as a loss on the fair value of derivative. Substantially all of the loss on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The valuation at March 31, 2015 was valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants granted to the debt holders as of March 31, 2015.

As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the conversion price of the 2011 Notes was adjusted to $3.00.

Private Placement Offering – June/July 2012

In June and July 2012, the Company issued to subscribers 6% convertible promissory notes due on June 14, 2017 (“2012 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $6.2 million and warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 1.2 million shares of Common Stock (“2012 Warrants”) in a private placement (the “2012 Offering”).

The 2012 Notes were initially convertible into Common Stock at $5.00 per share, subject to weighted average adjustment for issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions. Additionally, the conversion price may not be adjusted below $0.25.

The Company valued the 2012 Warrants and the BCF at $1,956,517 ~~each~~ each for a total of $3,913,034 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the third quarter of fiscal 2012. This ~~discount~~ discount is being amortized over the life of the 2012 Notes or until such time as the 2012 Notes are repaid or converted, or upon ~~exercise~~ exercise of the 2012 Warrants. The valuation of the 2012 Warrants and BCF were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 53.43% iii) risk free interest rate of 0.9% and expected term of 5 years. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company amortized $63,322 of the of debt discount. Following the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below), the remaining principal amount of 2012 Notes was $200,000 and the related discount to the convertible debt was $126,424. The Company amortized $612,~~321~~ 642 of the remaining debt discount during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the conversion price of the 2012 Notes was adjusted to $3.31.

Private Placement Offering – December 2012

In December 2012 and March 2013, the Company issued to subscribers 6% convertible notes due on December 28, 2017 (the “December 2012 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $3.1 million and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 615,000 shares of Common Stock (the “December 2012 Warrants”) in a private placement (the “December 2012 Offering”).

The December 2012 Notes were initially convertible into Common Stock at $5.00 per share, subject to full ratchet adjustment for issuances of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions, and subject to weighted average anti-dilution adjustment for issuances of Common Stock as payment of interest on the Notes, the 2012 Notes and the December 2012 Notes. Additionally, the conversion price may not be adjusted below $0.25.

The Company valued the December 2012 Warrants and the BCF at $962,904 each for a total of $1,925,808 recorded as a discount to the convertible debt during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. This discount is being amortized over the life of the December 2012 Notes or until such time as the December 2012 Notes are repaid or converted, or upon exercise of the December 2012 Warrants. The valuation of the December 2012 Warrants and BCF were determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 52.92% iii) risk free interest rate of 0.72% and expected term of 5 years. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $32,124 of the of debt discount. The entire principal amount of the December 2012 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest on October 31, 2014, was exchanged as part of the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below).

Exchange Offer

On October 31, 2014, the Company completed an offer to exchange outstanding 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes and 2011 Warrants, 2012 Warrants and December 2012 Warrants listed above (the “Exchange Offer”), for the issuance of common stock at the rate of $2.15 per share in exchange for the entire balance (principal and interest) of the notes and warrants issued with the applicable note. The Company exchanged $20.5 million principal amount of the previously outstanding $20.9 million of convertible notes and 4,859,409 warrants for 9,583,384 shares of common stock in the exchange offer. Following the offer to exchange, $200,000 principal amount 2011 Notes and $200,000 principal amount 2012 Notes remain outstanding, at conversion ratios of $3.00 and $3.31 per share, respectively, and 66,667 2011 Warrants and 60,424 2012 Warrants remain outstanding with an exercise price of $3.00 and $3.31, respectively. Immediately prior to exchanging their notes in the Exchange Offer, holders of a majority of the principal amount of each of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes consented to the Company (i) issuing debt from time to time on terms which may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, in an aggregate amount up to $100,000,000, which debt may be secured or unsecured and senior or subordinated to or pari passu with, the Notes, (ii) entering into transactions with its officers, directors, employees and affiliates on terms approved by a majority of the Company’s independent and disinterested directors from time to time, (iii) declaring and paying dividends and making distributions to its holders of common stock as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time and (iv) purchasing or acquiring shares of the Company’s common stock or other equity securities, including the notes and warrants, on terms as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

The Company ~~accounted~~valued ~~for~~the December 2012 Warrants and the ~~Exchange~~BCF ~~Offer~~at $962,904 each for a total of $1,925,808 recorded as ana ~~induced~~discount ~~conversion under~~to the ~~criteria~~convertible ~~established~~debt induring ~~ASC~~the ~~470-20-40~~first quarter of fiscal 2013. This discount Inis ~~accordance~~being ~~with~~amortized ~~ASC~~over ~~470-20-40,~~the life of the ~~Company~~December ~~recognized~~2012 anNotes ~~expense~~or ~~equal~~until tosuch time as the December 2012 Notes are repaid or ~~fair~~converted, ~~value~~or upon exercise of the ~~shares~~December ~~issued~~2012 inWarrants. The valuation of the ~~Exchange~~December ~~Offer~~2012 inWarrants ~~excess~~and ofBCF ~~the~~were determined ~~fair~~using ~~value~~the ofBlack-Scholes ~~shares~~option ~~issuable~~pricing atmodel with the ~~stated~~following ~~conversion~~weighted ~~rates~~assumptions for all debt issuances: i) expected dividend rate of ~~the~~0% ~~2011~~ii) ~~Notes,~~expected ~~2012~~volatility ~~Notes~~of 52.92% iii) risk free interest rate of 0.72% and ~~December~~expected ~~2012~~term ~~Notes~~of 5 years. During the ~~This~~six ~~resulted~~months inended aMarch ~~debt~~31, ~~conversion~~2015, ~~expense~~the ofCompany amortized $932,~~350,726~~124 ~~for~~of the ~~three~~of ~~months~~debt discount. The entire principal amount ~~ended~~of the December 2012 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest on October 31, 2014, was exchanged as part of the Exchange Offer on October 31, 2014 (described below).

Exchange Offer

On October 31, 2014, the Company completed an offer to exchange outstanding convertible notes and warrants, for the issuance of common stock at the rate of $2.15 per share in exchange for the entire balance (principal and interest) of the notes and warrants issued with the applicable note. The Company exchanged $20.5 million principal amount of the previously outstanding $20.9 million of convertible notes and 4,859,409 warrants for 9,583,384 shares of common stock in the exchange offer. Following the offer to exchange, $200,000 principal amount 2011 Notes and $200,000 principal amount 2012 Notes remain outstanding, at conversion ratios of $3.00 and $3.31 per share, respectively, and 66,667 2011 Warrants and 60,424 2012 Warrants remain outstanding with an exercise price of $3.00 and $3.31, respectively. Immediately prior to exchanging their notes in the Exchange Offer, holders of a majority of the principal amount of each of the series of notes consented to the Company (i) issuing debt from time to time on terms which may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, in an aggregate amount up to $100,000,000, which debt may be secured or unsecured and senior or subordinated to or pari passu with, the Notes, (ii) entering into transactions with its officers, directors, employees and affiliates on terms approved by a majority of the Company’s independent and disinterested directors from time to time, (iii) declaring and paying dividends and making distributions to its holders of common stock as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time and (iv) purchasing or acquiring shares of the Company’s common stock or other equity securities, including the notes and warrants, on terms as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time.

The Company accounted for the Exchange Offer as an induced conversion under the criteria established in ASC 470-20-40. In accordance with ASC 470-20-40, the Company recognized an expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued in the Exchange Offer in excess of the fair value of shares issuable at the stated conversion rates of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes. This resulted in a debt conversion expense of $9,350,726 for the six months ended March 31, 2015.

June 2013 Loan and Security Agreement

On June 11, 2013, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Boomerang Sub, Inc., Boomerang USA Corp. and Boomerang MP Holdings Inc. (collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers” and individually, a “Borrower”), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) dated as of June 6, 2013 with lenders who became a lender party thereto (together with any party which subsequently becomes a lender party, the “Lenders” and, individually, a “Lender”) and the Agent (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement). Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, Lenders committed to fund $4,750,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers. The Loan and Security Agreement contemplated that the aggregate principal amount of borrowings may be increased to $10,000,000 through commitments from additional Lenders who subsequently become a party to the Loan and Security Agreement.

On July 12, 2013 and August 6, 2013, the Borrowers entered into Amendments No. 1 (the “Amendment”) and No. 2 (the “2^nd Amendment”) to the Loan and Security Agreement (collectively “the Amendments”). Pursuant to the Amendments, the additional Lenders committed to fund an additional $3,100,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers, bringing aggregate commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement to $7,850,000.

On December 24, 2014, the Borrowers entered into Amendment No. 3 (the “3^rd Amendment”). Pursuant to the 3^rd Amendment, the maximum aggregate principal amount of borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement was increased to $15,000,000. Additionally, Lenders and incremental lenders committed to fund an additional $7,050,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers, bringing aggregate commitments under the Loan and Security Agreement to $14,900,000.

As of September 30, 2014, the Company drew down an aggregate of $6,485,540 under the Loan and Security Agreement. The Company drew down an additional $1,314,460 during the three months ended December 31, 2014, bringing the total amount of borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement to $7,850,000 as of December 31, 2014.

The notes bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum, payable upon maturity. The maturity date of the Notes is May 31, 2016, subject to earlier prepayment upon acceleration of the occurrence of an event of default (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement); provided further that the Company may prepay the Notes at any time without penalty. The Company accrued $281,729 of interest expense during the three months ended December 31, 2014. Total accrued interest related to the Loan and Security Agreement was $1,183,811 as of December 31, 2014.

Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, the Borrowers assigned, pledged and granted to the Lenders a security interest in substantially all of their respective assets, including their respective intellectual property, accounts, receivables, general intangibles, equipment, inventory, all of the proceeds and products of the foregoing and the Company’s equity interests in the other Borrowers.

As partial consideration for providing advances under the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to each Lender warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of its common stock for each $100,000 advanced. The warrants are exercisable at $5.00 per share, subject to full-ratchet adjustment for issuance below the exercise price, subject to certain exceptions. The warrants expire on June 6, 2018. As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the exercise price of the Loan and Security Agreement warrants was adjusted to $2.15 and the number of warrants issuable was adjusted to 46,512 for each $100,000 advanced.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,016,674 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $1,944,688, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $174,118 of the debt discount.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 634,508 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $160,793, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the notes or until such time as the notes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. The valuation of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 35.05% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.39-1.63% and expected term of 3.55-3.66 years. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $18,678 of the debt discount related to these warrants.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

As of September 30, 2014, the Company drew down an aggregate of $6,485,540 under the Loan and Security Agreement. The Company drew down an additional $3,564,460 during the six months ended March 31, 2015, bringing the total amount of borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement to $10,050,000 as of March 31, 2015.

The notes bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum, payable upon maturity. The maturity date of the Notes is May 31, 2016, subject to earlier prepayment upon acceleration of the occurrence of an event of default (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement); provided further that the Company may prepay the Notes at any time without penalty. The Company accrued $639,516 of interest expense during the six months ended March 31, 2015. Total accrued interest related to the Loan and Security Agreement was $1,541,657 as of March 31, 2015.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,016,674 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $1,944,688, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. During the six months ended March 31, 2015, the Company amortized $348,236 of the debt discount.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the six months ended March 31, 2015, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,657,788 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $645,461, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the notes or until such time as the notes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. The valuation of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 32.12-35.05% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.29-1.63% and expected term of 3.39-3.66 years. During the six months ended March 31, 2015, the Company amortized $115,775 of the debt discount related to these warrants.

The following officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company participated as Lenders in the Loan and Security Agreement:

Name	Commitment		Amount Funded as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015		Aggregate Number of Warrants Issuable		Warrants Issued as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015
The Estate of Gene Mulvihill(1)	$	500,000	$	500,000		232,561		232,561
Sunset Marathon Partners LLC(2)	$	250,000	$	250,000		116,281		116,281
MRP Holdings LLC(3)	$	400,000	$	~~200~~240,000		~~116~~186,047		93116,~~027~~628
Burton I. Koffman and David Koffman(4)	$	750,000	$	750,000		~~371~~348,~~969~~838		~~371~~348,~~969~~838
Anthony P. Miele III(5)	$	25,000	$	25,000		11,631		11,631
Alexandria Equities, LLC(6)	$	700,000	$	~~200~~420,000		325,582		93195,~~026~~349
Albert Behler(7)	$	400,000	$	~~200~~240,000		~~116~~186,047		93116,~~026~~628
Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC(8)	$	1,000,000	$	-600,000		465,117		-279,070
James Gelly(9)	$	400,000	$	240,000		186,047		116,628

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

(1)

Gail Mulvihill and Andrew Mulvihill, the co-administrators of the estate, exercise voting and investment power over the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. Gail Mulvihill is a principal stockholder of the Company and mother of Christopher, the Company’s President and a principal stockholder of the Company. Andrew Mulvihill is a brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(2)

James Mulvihill, was a principal stockholder of the Company at the time we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement, has voting and investment power over the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and is a brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(3)

MRP Holdings LLC is owned by Mark Patterson, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, a principal stockholder and the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

(4)

Directly and indirectly through entities they control and by members of their families and entities they control, Burton Koffman and David Koffman are principal stockholders of the Company. In addition, David Koffman is a director of the Company.

(5)

Anthony P. Miele, III is a director of the Company.

(6)

Alexandria Equities, LLC was a principal stockholder of the Company at the time we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement.

	(7)	Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.
	(8)	Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC, is managed by Peter Mulvihill, brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(7)

Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.

(8)

Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC, is managed by Peter Mulvihill, brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(9)

James Gelly is the Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company.

A majority of the principal amount of each series of convertible notes (due 2016, June 2017 and December 2017) consented to the Company’s entering into the Loan Agreement and increasing the secured indebtedness under the Loan Agreement, and acknowledged that the secured indebtedness under the Notes is senior in right of payment and otherwise to the convertible notes.

15Long-Term Note – Related Party

In March, 2015, Boomerang and SB&G Properties, LC, restructured the $573,982 due to related party for deferred rent through the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $500,000. The note accrues interest at a rate of four percent (4%) annually on the outstanding principal with all accrued principal and interest due on or before February 28, 2020. Accordingly, the Company reclassified the debt from a current liability to a non-current liability on its balance sheet for the period ending March 31, 2015.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

	Principal
	As of
	12/31/2014			9/30/2014			Maturity Date	Interest Rate			Secured
	3/31/2015			9/30/2014			Maturity Date	Interest Rate			Secured
	(unaudited)
Current Debt- Third Party:
Loan Payable- Third Party	$	80,538		$	80,538		Upon Demand		10	%	No
Equipment Note Payable (current portion)		-			9,024		1/15/2015		6	%	Yes
Total Current Debt- Third Party	$	80,538		$	89,562
Long-Term Debt – Third Party:
Long-Term Notes – June 2013 Loan Agreement	$	57,~~725~~205,300		$	4,729,866		5/31/2016		15	%	Yes
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			3,665,763		11/1/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		200,000			1,250,000		11/18/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			925,000		12/9/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2012 Offering		200,000			4,065,000		6/14/2017		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – Dec 2012 Offering		-			1,230,000		12/28/2017		6	%	No
Discount on Notes		(12,~~772~~098,~~209~~261	)		(10,073,448	)
Amortization of Discount		~~834~~1,~~434~~041,172			5,077,137
Total Long-Term Debt – Third Party	$	56,~~187~~548,~~525~~211		$	10,869,318
Long-Term Debt- Related Party:
Long-Term Notes – June 2013 Loan Agreement	$	2,~~124~~844,700		$	1,755,674		5/31/2016		15	%	Yes
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			5,683,757		11/1/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2011 Offering		-			100,000		11/18/2016		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – 2012 Offering		-			2,135,000		6/14/2017		6	%	No
Convertible Notes – Dec 2012 Offering		-			1,845,000		12/28/2017		6	%	No
Discount on Notes		(585,148	)		(8,329,964	)
Long-Term Note - Related Party		500,000			-		2/28/2020		4	%	No
Amortization of Discount		282,238			4,335,717
Discount on Notes		(743,764	)		(8,329,964	)
Total Long-Term Debt- Related Party	$	1,821,790		$	7,525,184
Amortization of Discount		359,310			4,335,717
Total Long-Term Debt- Related Party	$	2,960,246		$	7,525,184

The aggregate maturities of our long-term debt are as follows:

Twelve months ended
December 31, 2016	$	8,050,000
March 31, 2017	$	10,250,000
December 31, 2017		200,000
March 31, 2018		200,000
Total	$	8,250,000
March 31, 2019		-
March 31, 2020		500,000
Total	$	10,950,000

NOTE 8 – EQUITY

Common Stock:

On October 31, 2014, pursuant to the Exchange Offer described in Note 7, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,583,384 shares of common stock at $2.15 per share, in exchange for outstanding convertible notes and warrants. Included in the Exchange Offer was the issuance of 48,674 shares of common stock in lieu of cash ~~payments~~ payments of $104,463 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $12.58 15 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

16On December 31, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,815 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $6,050 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes and 2012 Notes.

On March 31, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,755 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $5,918 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. These shares of stock were issued at $2.15 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes and 2012 Notes.

At March 31, 2015, the Company required shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise as follows:

Options			3,421,292
Warrants			9,225,920
Convertible Notes			127,090
Total Shares			12,774,302

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

On December 31, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,815 shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments of $6,050 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share, pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes.

At December 31, 2014, the Company required shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise as follows:

Options			2,229,542
Warrants			8,262,502
Convertible Notes			127,090
Total Shares			10,619,134

Warrants:

As a result of the issuance of shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer, the exercise prices of the remaining outstanding 2011 Warrants and 2012 Warrants were adjusted to $3.00 and $3.31, respectively.

Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement described in Note 7, during the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, we issued warrants to Lenders to purchase an aggregate of ~~634~~1,~~508~~657,788 shares of Common Stock of the Company (after giving effect to the Exchange Offer). The warrants are exercisable at $2.15 per share (after giving effect to the Exchange Offer), subject to full ratchet adjustment for issuance below the exercise price, subject to certain exceptions. Additionally, the exercise price may not be adjusted below $1.00. Cashless exercise is permitted if the average trading volume of the Company’s Common Stock during at least five (5) of the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of the notice of exercise is at least 10,000 shares, and will be based upon the average of the last sale price of the Common Stock during such five (5) consecutive trading day period. The warrants expire on June 6, 2018. When these warrants were issued, the fair value of each warrant granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: (i) risk free interest rate of 1.3929-1.63% and expected term of 3.5539-3.66 years, (iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 32.12-35.05%. The Company valued these warrants at $~~160~~645,~~794~~461, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the Loan and Security Agreement or until such time as the notes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company amortized $18115,~~678~~774 of ~~the~~ the of debt discount.

Options:

On November 17, 2014, the Company issued options to purchase 471,719 shares of common stock of the Company to Mark Patterson, former Chief Executive Officer, and options to purchase 176,894 ~~shares~~ shares of common stock of the Company to Christopher Mulvihill, President. The options were issued in exchange for an aggregate of $459,643 of deferred compensation. The options are exercisable at $2.15 per share, have a term of five years and vest immediately. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: (i) risk free interest rate of 1.64%, (ii) expected life of 5 years, (iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 35.34%. The Company valued these options at $459,643 and recorded the expense during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

On November 17, 2014, the Company issued options to purchase 275,169 shares of common stock of the Company to a consultant. The options were issued in exchange for approximately $195,000 of services provided to the Company. The options are exercisable at $2.15 per share, have a term of five years and vest immediately. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The assumptions used were similar to those used for the option grants to Messrs. Patterson and Mulvihill on November 17, 2014. The Company valued these options at $195,000 and recorded the expense during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

On November 17, 2014, the Company granted options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock of the Company to each of Directors Joseph Bellantoni, Maureen Cowell, Kevin Cassidy, David Koffman and Anthony Miele. The options are exercisable at $2.15 per share and have a term of five years. The options are subject to a vesting schedule, under which one-third of the options will vest immediately, and one-third of the options will vest on each of November 17, 2015 and November 17, 2016. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The assumptions used were similar to those used for the option grants to Messrs. Patterson and Mulvihill on November 17, 2014. The Company valued these options at $88,582 and is allocating this expense over the vesting period. The Company recorded an expense of $718,~~382~~ 455 related to these options during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

On November 17, 2014, the Company granted options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company to the former Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The options are exercisable at $2.15 per share, have a term of five years and vest immediately. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: (i) risk free interest rate of 1.49%, (ii) expected life of 5 years, (iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 35.05%. The Company valued these options at $14,373 and recorded the expense during the six months ended March 31, 2015.

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

On ~~November~~January 1713, ~~2014~~2015, the Company granted options to purchase 20500,000 shares of common stock of the Company to James Gelly, Chief Executive Officer of the ~~former~~Company, options to purchase 450,000 shares of common stock of the Company to George Gelly, Chief Operating Officer of the Company., and options to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock of the Company to Mark Patterson, Chairman of the Company. The options are exercisable at $2.15 ~~per~~ per share, and have a term of five years. The ~~and~~options are subject to a vesting schedule, under which one-third of the options will vest immediately., ~~When~~and one-third of the options will vest on each of January 13, 2016 and January 13, 2017. When these options were issued, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted assumptions were used: (i) risk free interest rate of 1.4937%, (ii) expected life of 5 years, (iii) dividend rate of 0.00% and (iv) expected volatility of 35 32.0512%. The Company valued these options at $14820,~~373~~997 and is ~~recorded~~allocating this expense over the vesting period. The Company recorded an expense of $102,625 related to these options during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company recorded an expense of $4968,~~335~~872 related to options issued in fiscal year 2014 under the Company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

HSK Funding, Inc., and Lake Isle Corp.~~, and~~ ~~Venturetek, LP,~~ are beneficial holders of shares of our company’s common stock and certain of their members and stockholders are also the members of SB&G Properties, LC. (“SB&G”), which iswas the landlord under a lease with us at 324 West 2450 North, Building B, Logan, Utah until March 31, 2015. Gail Mulvihill, the individual who exercises sole voting and investment control over Lake Isle Corp., is the mother of Christopher Mulvihill, our President, and is a principal stockholder of our company. The approximately 29,750 square foot leased premises ~~are~~were used for Boomerang’s manufacturing activities. This iswas a month-to-month lease at a rate of $21,717 per month, of which $14,717 iswas classified as deferred rent. Deferred rental payments totaling $573,982 have been accrued as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015. In March, 2015, Boomerang and ~~classified~~SB&G asProperties, LC, restructured the $573,982 due to related party for deferred rent through the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $500,000. The note accrues interest at a rate of four percent (4%) annually on ~~our~~the outstanding principal with all accrued principal and interest due on or before February 28, 2020. Accordingly, the Company reclassified the debt from a current liability to a non-current liability on its balance sheet for the period ending March 31, 2015.

~~Stan~~SB&G ~~Checketts~~is ~~Properties~~obligated ~~(“SCP”),~~on a ~~company~~twenty-year ~~owned~~promissory note due August by1, ~~the~~2027 ~~former~~owing ~~chief~~to ~~executive~~Zions ~~officer~~Bank. ofThe ~~Boomerang’s~~principal ~~wholly~~amount due ~~owned~~was ~~subsidiary~~$635,245 ~~Boomerang~~as ~~Sub~~of March 31, ~~Inc.~~2015, isand the ~~landlord~~note ~~under~~bears interest at 3.807% aper ~~lease~~annum. ~~with~~The uspromissory ~~for~~note ~~premises~~is ~~located~~collateralized atby ~~324~~the ~~West~~real ~~2450~~property ~~North,~~that ~~Building~~is B,the ~~Logan,~~subject of the lease from SB&G to Boomerang Utah. ~~The~~ ~~approximately 18~~Boomerang,~~000~~ ~~square foot~~the ~~leased~~Estate ~~premises~~of ~~are,~~Gene inMulvihill ~~addition~~and toMessrs. ~~Building~~Stan A,Checketts ~~also~~and ~~used~~Burton ~~for~~Koffman ~~Boomerang’s~~are ~~manufacturing~~the ~~activities~~joint and several guarantors of this promissory note. ~~This is~~Gene aMulvihill ~~month-to-month~~was ~~lease~~the athusband aof ~~rate~~Gail Mulvihill and the father of ~~$13~~Christopher Mulvihill,~~140~~ the ~~per~~President ~~month~~of the Company.

SB&G is obligated on a twenty-year promissory note due August 1, 2027 owing to Zions Bank. The principal amount due was $645,611 as of December 31, 2014, and the note bears interest at 3.807% per annum. The promissory note is collateralized by the real property that is the subject of the lease from SB&G to Boomerang Utah. Boomerang, the Estate of Gene Mulvihill and Messrs. Stan Checketts and Burton Koffman are the joint and several guarantors of this promissory note. Gene Mulvihill was the husband of Gail Mulvihill and the father of Christopher Mulvihill, the President of the Company.

In April 2010, we entered into a twenty-year ground lease with Route 94 Development Corporation (“Route 94”) to lease a portion of an approximately fifteen acre parcel in the town of Hamburg, located in Hardyston Township, New Jersey, on which we constructed a RoboticValet™ parking facility. The leased property is adjacent to Grand Cascades Lodge (“Cascades”), a hotel within the Crystal Springs Golf and Spa Resort (“the Resort”). The parking facility was constructed by Crystal Springs Builders, LLC (“Builders”). It is intended that this facility will be used by us primarily for demonstration and marketing purposes in the eastern portion of the United States. In consideration of the benefits to us under the terms of the lease, we agree to provide to the lessor and its affiliates parking and storage space within the facility at no cost to the lessor and its affiliates subject to our right to use the facility for demonstration purposes. In addition, we are required to pay the operating costs, premiums on the insurance required under the terms of the lease and incremental property taxes resulting from our construction of the facility. For a period of 60 months, commencing five years after execution of the lease, the lessor has the option to purchase the facility from us and we have a right to cause the lessor to buy from us the facility we construct. The price to be paid by the lessor upon exercise of its option to purchase the facility is 110% of the greater of (i) the depreciated value of the facility, or (ii) the fair market value of the facility, and the price to be paid by the lessor upon exercise of our right to cause the lessor to buy the facility is $1.00.

The Resort owns and operates seven golf courses, two hotels and a fitness facility and develops real estate in Sussex County NJ, which is comprised of more than 40 additional entities, including the above named entities. Gail Mulvihill owns 50% of each of Builders, Cascades and Route 94 and, indirectly, through these and various other entities, Gail Mulvihill and her family own approximately 50% of the Resort. Except as set forth above, no other officer, director or 5% or greater stockholder of the Company has any equity interest in Builders, Cascades or Route 94. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $1,000 and $44,000 for Cascades for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No expenses were incurred for Route 94 or Builders during the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.19

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

The Resort owns and operates seven golf courses, two hotels and a fitness facility and develops real estate in Sussex County NJ, which is comprised of more than 40 additional entities, including the above named entities. Gail Mulvihill owns 50% of each of Builders, Cascades and Route 94 and, indirectly, through these and various other entities, Gail Mulvihill and her family own approximately 50% of the Resort. Except as set forth above, no other officer, director or 5% or greater stockholder of the Company has any equity interest in Builders, Cascades or Route 94. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $3,200 and $3,800 for Cascades for the six months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No expenses were incurred for Route 94 or Builders during the six months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Certain officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the Company participated as Affiliate Lenders under the June 2013 Loan and Security Agreement. See Note 7.

Our management believes that the terms of the above transactions are as favorable to our company as could have been obtained from nonaffiliated persons at the time and under the circumstances as when the transactions were entered into.

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Boomerang Utah is a joint and several guarantor on a twenty-year promissory note owing to Zions Bank in the principal amount of $~~645~~635,~~611~~245 as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, bearing interest at 3.807% per ~~annum~~ annum and due August 1, 2027. The promissory note is collateralized by the real property that is the subject of the lease from SB&G to Boomerang. The Estate of Gene Mulvihill and Messrs. Checketts and Burton Koffman, are the other joint and ~~several~~ several guarantors of the promissory note.

In March 2013, we entered into a five year lease on our principal office in New Jersey, which expires in March 2018. In February 2015, we entered into a three year lease on our office in Utah which expires in February 2018. In January 2015, we entered into a three year lease on a research, design, production and testing facility in Fort Pierce, Florida, which expires in March 2018. The aggregate future minimum annual rental payments on ~~this~~these ~~lease~~leases, exclusive of escalation payments for taxes and operating costs, are as follows:

Twelve months ended December 31, 2015	$	42,508
Twelve months ended March 31, 2016	$	123,458
December 31, 2016		42,508
March 31, 2017		177,408
December 31, 2017		42,508
March 31, 2018		180,408
December 31, 2018		10,627
Total	$	481,274
Total	$	138,151

On March 15, 2013, Crescent Heights R&D, LLC (“Crescent Heights”), filed a complaint against Boomerang in the State of Florida for fraud, breach of contract and specific performance, as well as equitable rescission which alleged an unspecified amount of damages in excess of the purchase price. Boomerang was ~~subsequently~~ subsequently granted a motion to remove this matter to federal court. On May 17, 2013, the court entered an order that our motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings be granted. The parties agreed to arbitrate the matter in front of the American Arbitration ~~Association~~ Association in November 2014. The dispute ~~arises~~arose from a contract to provide a rack and rail automated parking system. ~~Crescent Heights’ claims, Boomerang’s defenses and Boomerang’s affirmative claims all arise from the contract.~~ On ~~January 23~~April 21, 2015, the arbitrator issued ana ~~Interim~~Final Arbitration Award. The arbitrator denied Crescent Heights’ claims of fraud in the inducement, equitable rescission based on fraud, and declaratory relief to strike the limitation of liability clause, but found Boomerang in Breach of Contract. Crescent Heights was awarded damages of $1,197,~~887~~890, plus ~~reasonable~~ attorneys’ fees and costs~~. We~~ ~~expect~~of ~~the Arbitrator to issue a final arbitration award in April 2015~~$319, 920, which ~~will include~~Boomerang ~~the~~is ~~attorney’s~~required ~~fees~~to ~~and~~pay ~~costs~~in ~~payable~~fiscal byyear ~~Boomerang~~2015. Boomerang established a reserve of $1,~~372~~517,~~887~~810 for the amount of the award, ~~plus reasonable~~ attorneys’ fees and costs.

On May 15, 2013, Boomerang entered into a Manufacturing and Licensing Agreement (the “Agreement”) with JBT Corporation (“JBT”), pursuant to which JBT would manufacture all Boomerang automated guided vehicles (“AGVs”) and license certain software to us for use in our robotic parking systems, including a non-exclusive, non-transferable, license to sub-license the software to customers for the duration of each customer contract with Boomerang. In each year from the effective date of May 15, 2013, Boomerang was required to purchase a minimum of 25 AGVs from JBT based on JBT’s cost plus an agreed upon profit. If we did not meet these minimum requirements, JBT’s sole remedy was to terminate the Agreement. In the event of expiration or termination of the Agreement, JBT is subject to a three-year non-competition provision, and obligated to license to Boomerang software for up to three years from the expiration or termination date. The Agreement was terminated by JBT effective May 23, 2014, due to Boomerang not meeting the minimum purchase requirements described above. With JBT’s knowledge, Boomerang manufactured, assembled, tested and delivered all AGVs for our first RoboticValet project, BrickellHouse, and expects to do so for subsequent projects in which our first-generation AGV design is included. As mentioned above, under the Agreement, Boomerang has the right to continue to license software through May 22, 2017, and expects to collaborate with JBT on a project-by-project basis going forward.

On June 6, 2013, Boomerang entered into a marketing agreement with BrickellHouse Holding, LLC, whereas BrickellHouse Holding, LLC will allow Boomerang to use its parking system for sales and marketing purposes. Boomerang will pay BrickellHouse Holding, LLC a royalty for each sale of a system equal to 2% of the purchase price of that system, not to exceed an aggregate of $2 million. The agreement shall be in effect until the amount of royalty payments reaches $2 million. As of December 31, 2014, the Company accrued $41,529 of royalty payments under this agreement.20

BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014~~2015

On June 6, 2013, Boomerang entered into a marketing agreement with BrickellHouse Holding, LLC, whereas BrickellHouse Holding, LLC will allow Boomerang to use its parking system for sales and marketing purposes. Boomerang will pay BrickellHouse Holding, LLC a royalty for each sale of a system equal to 2% of the purchase price of that system, not to exceed an aggregate of $2 million. The agreement shall be in effect until the amount of royalty payments reaches $2 million. As of March 31, 2015, the Company accrued $41,529 of royalty payments under this agreement.

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has reviewed events that have occurred after ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, through the date of issuance of the financial statements.

~~Effective~~On asApril ~~of January 13~~1, 2015, (the ~~“Effective~~Borrowers ~~Date”), Boomerang~~ entered into anAmendment ~~employment~~No. ~~agreement~~4 ~~with~~(the “4rd ~~James~~Amendment”). Pursuant ~~Gelly~~ to ~~serve~~the as4rd ~~its~~Amendment, ~~chief~~an ~~executive~~incremental ~~officer~~lender ~~and as a director of the~~committed ~~Company.~~to ~~Mr.~~fund ~~Gelly~~an ~~replaces~~additional ~~Mark Patterson~~$50,000 ~~who~~principal ~~has~~amount ~~resigned as CEO as~~ of ~~the~~loans ~~Effective Date. Mr. Patterson will continue~~ to ~~serve as chairman of~~ the ~~Company’s~~Borrowers, ~~board~~bringing ofaggregate ~~directors.~~commitments ~~Also~~under ~~effective as of~~ the ~~Effective~~Loan ~~Date,~~and ~~the Company appointed George Gelly~~Security asAgreement ~~its~~to ~~chief operating officer~~$14,950,000.

In connection with his appointment as CEO, the Company granted to James Gelly non-plan options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company with a five year term, vesting as to one-third of the shares on each of the Effective Date and the first and second anniversaries of the date of the Effective Date, exercisable at an exercise price of $2.15 per share. In connection with his appointment as COO, the Company granted to George Gelly non-plan options to purchase 450,000 shares of common stock of the Company with a five year term, vesting as to one-third of the shares on each of the Effective Date and the first and second anniversaries of the date of the Effective Date, exercisable at an exercise price of $2.15 per share.21

ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OperationS

INTRODUCTION

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to the risks discussed in this report.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and cash equivalents for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, 2015 ~~2014~~ increased by $7936,~~079~~253 to $~~965~~1,~~956~~895,130. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, our working capital together with borrowings of ~~approximately~~ $74.059 million available under our Loan and Security Agreement expect to allow us to carry out our business plan until at least ~~March~~ June 2016 without securing any additional contracts. To implement our full business plan, we may require additional funds and anticipate raising these funds through public or private debt or equity offerings, including offerings to our existing security holders. In addition, we may seek to restructure our existing liabilities and debt. There can be no assurance that the capital we require to meet our operating needs will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unsuccessful in raising sufficient capital, we may be required to curtail our operations.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had a net loss of $1215,~~379~~173,~~471~~256. Included in this net loss were several non-cash expenses that partially offset the use of cash. These non-cash ~~expenses~~ expenses include depreciation of $63117,~~557~~185, amortization of discount on debt of $~~475~~759,~~743~~551, issuance of common stock for interest expense of $116,431, rent concession of $~~110~~65,~~513~~152, expenses from the issuance of stock options of $~~725~~858,~~733~~968, loss from the disposal of property, plant and equipment of $47,056 and debt conversion expense of $9,350,726. These items were offset by a non-cash ~~gain~~gains on the fair value of derivative of $~~621~~538,~~581~~896. Cash decreased as we experienced ~~three~~six month increases in prepaid expenses and other assets of $~~139~~127,~~386~~819, in retainage receivable of $84222,~~015~~183, and in inventories of $57356,~~726~~769. Cash also decreased as we experienced a decrease in ~~billings in excess of costs of $694,927, and in~~ estimated loss on uncompleted contract of $99225,~~509~~846. Cash increased as we experienced ~~three~~six month decreases in accounts receivable of $~~562~~624,~~884~~879, and increases in deposits payable of $~~125~~150,000, in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $1,~~280~~802,~~782~~574, ~~and~~ in due to related ~~parties~~ party of $44,~~152~~153, and in billings in excess of costs of $141,784. After adjusting our net loss for these non-cash items and the net changes in assets and liabilities, net cash used in operations was $12,~~337~~566,~~525~~310 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

Financing activities provided $13,~~355~~555,436 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015. Net cash provided by financing activities consisted of $13,~~364~~564,460 of borrowings under the Loan Agreement, offset by $9,024 of note repayments.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, net cash used in in investing activities was $52,873, and consisted of additional purchases of property, plant and equipment of $1055,~~832~~473 offset by proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment of $2,600.

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the ~~three months~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, ~~changes~~ changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources ~~that~~ that is material to our interests.

Convertible Notes

As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, and reflective of the Exchange Offer ~~described~~ described below, the Company had $400,000 of indebtedness under convertible promissory notes associated with the November/December 2011 Offering (“2011 Notes”) and June/July 2012 Offering (“2012 Notes” and collectively the “Notes”). The Notes become due between November 2016 and December 2017. As of December 31, 2014, the 2011 Notes and 2012 Notes were ~~convertible~~ convertible into 66,667 shares of common stock at $3.00, and 60,423 shares of common stock at $3.31, respectively. The Notes are subject to a weighted average adjustment for issuances of common stock or common stock equivalents below the conversion price, subject to certain exceptions. The respective conversion price for the 2012 Notes may not be adjusted below $0.25. Interest accrues on the Notes at 6% per annum, payable quarterly at the Company’s option in: (i) cash or (ii) shares of Common Stock.

For so long as the above Notes are outstanding, without the prior written consent of the holders of at least a majority of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Notes, the Company may not:

create, incur, assume or suffer to exist, any indebtedness, contingent and otherwise, which should, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied, be classified upon the Company's balance sheet as liabilities and which would be senior or pari passu in right of payment to the notes, except for: (i) secured or unsecured debt issued to a bank or financial institution on commercially reasonable terms, or (ii) any other debt not to exceed $5 million, individually, or in the aggregate, provided herein that the Company may incur up to an aggregate of $100 million of debt under clause (ii) on terms approved by the Company’s board of directors;

and may not, unless approved by the Company’s board of directors, permit its subsidiaries to, engage in any transactions with any officer, director, employee or any affiliate of the Company, including any contract, agreement or other arrangement providing for the furnishing of services to or by, providing for rental of real or personal property to or from, or otherwise requiring payments to or from any officer, director or such employee or, to the knowledge of the Company, any entity in which any officer, director, or any such employee has a substantial interest or is an officer, director, trustee or partner, in each case in excess of $50,000, other than: (i) for payment of reasonable salary for services actually rendered, as approved by the Board of Directors of the Company as fair in all respects to the Company, (ii) reimbursement for expenses incurred on behalf of the Company (iii) transactions and written arrangements in existence on the date of the initial issuance of the notes, and any amendments, modifications, cancellations, terminations, limitations and waivers approved by a majority of the independent disinterested directors of the Company; and

and may not, unless approved by the Company’s board of directors, permit any subsidiary to: (i) declare or pay any dividends or make any distributions to any holder(s) of common stock or such subsidiaries (other than dividends and distributions from a subsidiary to the Company) or (ii) purchase or otherwise acquire for value, directly or indirectly, any shares or other equity security of the Company, other than the notes or warrants issued in connection with the notes

Exchange Offer

On October 31, 2014, the Company completed an offer to exchange outstanding ~~2011~~convertible ~~Notes,~~notes ~~2012 Notes~~ and ~~December 2012 Notes and 2011 Warrants~~warrants, ~~2012 Warrants and December 2012 Warrants listed above (the “Exchange Offer”),~~ for the issuance of common stock at the rate of $2.15 per share in exchange for the entire balance (principal and interest) of the notes and warrants issued with the applicable note. The Company exchanged $20.5 million principal amount of the previously outstanding $20.9 million of convertible notes and 4,859,409 warrants for 9,583,384 shares of common stock in the exchange offer. Following the offer to exchange, $200,000 principal amount 2011 Notes and $200,000 principal amount 2012 Notes remain outstanding, at conversion ratios of $3.00 and $3.31 per share, respectively, and 66,667 2011 Warrants and 60,424 2012 Warrants remain outstanding with an exercise price of $3.00 and $3.31, respectively. Immediately ~~prior~~ prior to exchanging their notes in the Exchange Offer, holders of a majority of the principal amount of each of the ~~2011~~series ~~Notes,~~of ~~2012~~notes ~~Notes and December 2012 Notes~~ consented to the Company (i) issuing debt from time to time on terms which may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, in an aggregate amount up to $100,000,000, which debt may be secured or unsecured and senior or subordinated to or pari passu with, the Notes, (ii) entering into transactions with its officers, directors, employees and affiliates on terms approved by a majority of the Company’s independent and disinterested directors from time to time, (iii) declaring and paying dividends and making distributions to its holders of common stock as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time and (iv) purchasing or acquiring shares of the Company’s common stock or other equity securities, including the notes and warrants, on terms as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time.

The Company accounted for the Exchange Offer as an induced ~~conversion~~ conversion under the criteria established in ASC 470-20-40. In accordance with ASC 470-20-40, the Company recognized an expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued in the Exchange Offer in excess of the fair value of shares issuable at the stated conversion rates of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes and December 2012 Notes. This resulted in a debt conversion expense of $9,350,726 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

Derivative Liability

The Company has valued the warrants issued in connection with the November/December 2011 Offering, the 2011 Warrants, and the beneficial conversion features (“BCF”) of the 2011 Notes, to their maximum value in proportion to the 2011 Notes and had accounted for them as a discount to the debt. In certain circumstances the convertibility features and the attached Warrants contain reset provisions which adjust the conversion price of the 2011 Notes and the exercise price of the 2011 Warrants should the Company sell additional shares of common stock below the initial conversion price of the 2011 Notes or warrant exercise price as agreed to upon entry into the convertible notes payable. The Company has assessed that the reset provision for the convertibility feature and the warrant exercise price are such that they are not indexed to the Common Stock and is therefore a derivative in accordance with ASC 815-40. As such the derivative was valued on the date of its initiation, with each issuance of convertible debt, and will be re-valued at its fair value at each subsequent interim and annual reporting period.

2223

As of September 30, 2014, the aggregate fair value of the derivative was $646,120. The revaluation of the derivative as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 resulted in a derivative value of $1755,~~331~~612. The change in fair value of the derivative from September 30, 2014 to ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 resulted in a gain on the fair value of the derivative ~~liability~~ liability of $~~628~~590,~~789~~508. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to the reduction of the principal amount of the convertible notes as a result of the Exchange Offer. The derivative liability was revalued on ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~2015 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 3432.8312% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.6537%, iv) expected term of 1.8560 years and v) market price of of $23.1513.

December 2011 valued at $212,040. The Placement Agent Warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering. The Placement Agent Warrants have similar terms to those issued to the convertible debt holders, including a reset provision included with the warrants if the Company should obtain equity financing at a price per share lower than that of the exercise price of the warrants. The Placement Agent Warrants, similar to the 2011 Warrants issued to the purchasers of 2011 Notes in the 2011 Offering, do not meet the definition of being indexed to the Company’s own stock in accordance with ASC 815-40. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a derivative liability for the value of the Placement Agent Warrants. The derivative liability valued at $12,896 at September 30, 2014 was revalued at $64,508 at March 31, 2015. The difference in valuation for the six months ended March 31, 2014 was $51,612, accounted for as a loss on the fair value of derivative. Substantially all of the loss on the fair value of the derivative was due to a change in methodology in measuring the market price of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The valuation at March 31, 2015 was valued based on the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions similar to those used to value the 2011 Warrants granted to the debt holders as of March 31, 2015.

June 2013 Loan and Security Agreement

On June 11, 2013, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Boomerang Sub, Inc., Boomerang USA Corp. and Boomerang MP Holdings Inc. (collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers” and individually, a “Borrower”), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) dated as of June 6, 2013 with lenders who became a lender party thereto (together with any party which subsequently becomes a lender party, the “Lenders” and, individually, a “Lender”) and the Agent (as defined in the Loan Agreement). Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, Lenders committed to fund $4,750,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers. The Loan Agreement contemplated that the aggregate principal amount of borrowings may be increased to $10,000,000 through commitments from additional Lenders who subsequently become a party to the Loan Agreement.

On July 12, 2013 and August 6, 2013, the Borrowers entered into Amendments No. 1 (the “Amendment”) and No. 2 (the “2^nd Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement (collectively “the Amendments”). Pursuant to the Amendments, the additional Lenders committed to fund an additional $3,100,000 principal amount of loans to the Borrowers, bringing aggregate commitments under the Loan Agreement to $7,850,000.

23As of September 30, 2014, the Company drew down an aggregate of $6,485,540 under the Loan and Security Agreement. The Company drew down an additional $3,564,460 during the six months ended March 31, 2015, bringing the total amount of borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement to $10,050,000 as of March 31, 2015.

The notes bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum, payable ~~upon~~ upon maturity. The maturity date of the Notes is May 31, 2016, subject to earlier prepayment upon acceleration of the occurrence of of an event of default (as defined in the Loan and Security Agreement); provided further that the Company may prepay the Notes at at any time without penalty. The Company accrued $~~281~~639,~~729~~516 of interest expense during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015. Total accrued interest related to the Loan and Security Agreement was $1,~~183~~541,~~811~~657 as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during ~~the~~ the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,016,674 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $1,944,688, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company amortized $~~174~~348,~~118~~236 of the debt discount.

Pursuant to draws under the Loan and Security Agreement during the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of ~~634~~1,~~508~~657,788 shares of common stock. The Company valued these warrants at $~~160~~645,~~793~~461, recorded as a discount to long-term debt. This discount is being amortized ~~over~~ over the life of the notes or until such time as the notes are repaid, or upon exercise of the warrants. The valuation of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted assumptions: i) expected dividend rate of 0% ii) expected volatility of 32.12-35.05% iii) risk free interest rate of 1.3929-1.63% and expected term of 3.5539-3.66 years. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company amortized $18115,~~678~~774 of the debt discount related to these warrants.

The following officers, directors and 5% shareholders of the ~~Company~~ Company participated as ~~Affiliate~~ Lenders in the Loan and Security Agreement:

Name	Commitment		Amount Funded as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015		Aggregate Number of Warrants Issuable		Warrants Issued as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015
The Estate of Gene Mulvihill(1)	$	500,000	$	500,000		232,561		232,561
Sunset Marathon Partners LLC(2)	$	250,000	$	250,000		116,281		116,281
MRP Holdings LLC(3)	$	400,000	$	~~200~~240,000		~~116~~186,047		93116,~~027~~628
Burton I. Koffman and David Koffman(4)	$	750,000	$	750,000		~~371~~348,~~969~~838		~~371~~348,~~969~~838
Anthony P. Miele III(5)	$	25,000	$	25,000		11,631		11,631
Alexandria Equities, LLC(6)	$	700,000	$	~~200~~420,000		325,582		93195,~~026~~349
Albert Behler(7)	$	400,000	$	~~200~~240,000		~~116~~186,047		93116,~~026~~628
Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC(8)	$	1,000,000	$	-600,000		465,117		-279,070
James Gelly(9)	$	400,000	$	240,000		186,047		116,628

2425

(1)

(2)

(3)

MRP Holdings LLC is owned by Mark Patterson, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, a principal stockholder and the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

(4)

(5)

Anthony P. Miele, III is a director of the Company.

(6)

Alexandria Equities, LLC was a principal stockholder of the Company at the time we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement.

	(7)	Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.
	(8)	Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC, is managed by Peter Mulvihill, brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(7)

Albert Behler is a principal stockholder of the Company.

(8)

Fox Hunt Wine Collectors, LLC, is managed by Peter Mulvihill, brother of Christopher Mulvihill.

(9)

James Gelly is the Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL PERIOD FOR THE ~~THREE~~SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2014 COMPARED~~2015 COMPARED WITH ~~THREE~~SIX MONTHS ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~MARCH 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Revenues were $12,~~688~~350,~~112~~727 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~ 2015, compared with $13,~~040~~336,~~628~~863 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~increase~~decrease was attributable to less work ~~performed~~ performed on a large-scale RoboticValet project in Miami, FL, which was substantially completed in fiscal year 2014, partially offset by revenues generated from two smaller-scale RoboticValet projects that commenced in fiscal year 2014.

Cost of goods sold were $12,~~576~~473,~~634~~353 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, compared with $13,~~390~~910,~~553~~907 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~increase~~decrease for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~2015, was attributable to less work performed on a large-scale RoboticValet project in Miami, FL, which was substantially completed in fiscal year 2014, partially offset by revenues generated from two smaller-scale RoboticValet projects. that commenced in fiscal year 2014.. The Company recognized a gross ~~profit~~ loss of ($~~111~~122,~~478~~626) and a gross loss of ($~~349~~574,~~925~~044) for the quarters ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014, respectively, for an increase of $~~461~~451,~~403~~418.

Sales and marketing expenses were $~~160~~281,~~091~~501 during the ~~three months~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, compared with $~~170~~347,~~306~~147 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2013~~2014, for a decrease of $1065,~~215~~646. The decrease was due to reduced spending of approximately $2363,000 in salary related expense and ~~offset~~a bydecrease ~~an increase~~ in marketing and tradeshows of approximately $133,000. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the Company employed two full-time sales persons. Salespersons’ salaries are recorded under sales and marketing expense.

General and administrative expenses were $12,~~277~~768,~~858~~547 during the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, compared with $~~821~~1,~~544~~696,842 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014, for an increase of $~~456~~1,~~314~~071,705. The ~~Professional~~relocation ~~fees~~of our inventory and production and assembly equipment from Utah to Florida increased freight by approximately $9047,000, and ~~due~~facility toset ~~the~~up ~~legal~~expense ~~expenses~~by ~~associated with the Crescent Heights arbitration~~$53,000. ~~outside~~Contract ~~labor~~Labor increased by approximately $~~300~~640,000 as the Company increased the use of consultants, travel increased by approximately $70,000 and stock-based compensation increased by approximately $71200,000 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

Arbitration settlement charges were $1,372,887 during the three months ended December 31, 2014, compared with $0 during the three months ended December 31, 2013. This increase was due to an interim arbitration award related to the litigation with Crescent Heights.26

25Arbitration settlement charges were $1,517,810 during the six months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $0 during the six months ended March 31, 2014. This increase was due to an interim arbitration award related to the litigation with Crescent Heights.

Research and development expenses were $14,~~496~~505 during the ~~three months~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, compared with $4774,~~797~~125 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014, for a decrease of $3359,~~301~~620. The decrease was due to less research and development projects undertaken during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $63117,~~557~~185 during the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, compared to $73146,~~249~~666 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014, for a decrease of $929,~~692~~481. This decrease was the result of older assets becoming fully depreciated.

Interest expense was $~~397~~762,~~298~~055 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2014~~2015, compared with $~~474~~968,~~820~~735 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2013~~2014, for a decrease of $77206,~~522~~680. This decrease is due to the elimination of $20.5 million of convertible debt in the Exchange Offer in October 2014.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the 2011 Warrants. In addition, the Placement Agent Warrants were deemed not indexed to the Company’s common stock and accordingly the Company recorded a derivative liability. The derivative liability is required to be ~~revalued~~ revalued at each interim and annual reporting date until such time that it is settled. This revaluation resulted in a gain on fair ~~value~~ value of derivative of $~~621~~538,~~581~~896 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015. Substantially all of the increase in the gain on the fair value of the derivative was due to the reduction of the principal amount of the convertible notes as a result of the Exchange Offer. With respect to the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the warrants issued in connection with each offering. In addition, the placement agent was granted warrants similar in their terms to those issued to the debt holders. The Company has determined that the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering are indexed to the Company’s common stock and has not recorded a derivative liability. The Company also recorded a discount for the warrants issued in connection with each draw down of the June 2013 Loan Agreement. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 the Company amortized an aggregate of $~~475~~759,~~743~~551 of the debt discount for the 2011 Offering, the 2012 Offering, December 2012 Offering and June 2013 Loan Agreement.

FISCAL PERIOD FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015 COMPARED WITH THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014.

Revenues were $662,615 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $2,296,235 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The decrease was attributable to less work performed on a large-scale RoboticValet project in Miami, FL, which was substantially completed in fiscal year 2014, partially offset by revenues generated from two smaller-scale RoboticValet projects that commenced in fiscal year 2014..

Cost of goods sold were $896,719 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $2,520,354 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The decrease was attributable to less work performed on a large-scale RoboticValet project in Miami, FL, which was substantially completed in fiscal year 2014, partially offset by revenues generated from two smaller-scale RoboticValet projects that commenced in fiscal year 2014..

Sales and marketing expenses were $121,410 during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $176,841 during the three months ended March 31, 2014, for a decrease of $55,431. The decrease was due to reduced spending of approximately $15,000 on marketing and tradeshows and a reduction of approximately $40,000 in salary related expense. As of March 31, 2015, the Company employed two full-time sales persons.

General and administrative expenses were $1,490,689 during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $875,298 during the three months ended March 31, 2014, for an increase of $615,391. The relocation of our inventory and production and assembly equipment from Utah to Florida increased freight by approximately $47,000, and facility set up expense by $53,000. Also, travel increased by approximately $40,000, contract labor increased by approximately $330,000 as the Company increased use of consultants, and approximate increases were recognized in stock based compensation of $130,000. This was offset by a decrease in professional fees of $45,000.

Arbitration settlement charges were $144,923 during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $0 during the three months ended March 31, 2014. This increase was due to an interim arbitration award related to the litigation with Crescent Heights.

Research and development expenses were $9 during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $26,328 during the three months ended March 31, 2014, for a decrease of $26,319. The decrease was due to less research and development projects undertaken during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $53,628 during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $73,417 during the three months ended March 31, 2013, for a decrease of $19,789. This decrease was the result of result of older assets becoming fully depreciated.

Interest expense was $364,757 during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with $493,915 during the three months ended March 31, 2014, for a decrease of $129,158. This decrease is due to the elimination of $20.5 million of convertible debt in the Exchange Offer.

In connection with the 2011 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the 2011 Warrants. In addition, the Placement Agent Warrants were deemed not indexed to the Company’s common stock and accordingly the Company recorded a derivative liability. The derivative liability is required to be revalued at each interim and annual reporting date until such time that it is settled. This revaluation resulted in a loss on fair value of derivative of $82,685 during the three months ended March 31, 2015. With respect to the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering, the Company recorded a discount for the BCF and the warrants issued in connection with each offerings. In addition, the placement agent was granted warrants similar in their terms to those issued to the debt holders. The Company has determined that the 2012 Offering and the December 2012 Offering are indexed to the Company’s common stock and has not recorded a derivative liability. The Company also recorded a discount for the warrants issued in connection with each draw down of the June 2013 Loan Agreement. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company amortized an aggregate of $283,808 of the debt discount for the 2011 Offering, the 2012 Offering, December 2012 Offering and June 2013 Loan Agreement.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our ~~financial~~ financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES:

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates we use to prepare the consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experiences and assumptions believed to be reasonable under current facts and circumstances. Actual amounts and results could differ from these estimates made by management.

The Company has identified the accounting policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.

Principles of consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boomerang Systems, Inc. and the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents- For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts – Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful ~~accounts~~ accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. Account balances are ~~charged~~ charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. We determine this allowance based on known troubled accounts, history and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014 was $17,500.

26Property and equipment – Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives which range from three years to fifteen years. Depreciation and amortization for the six months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $117,185 and $146,666, respectively.

Property and equipment – Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives which range from three years to fifteen years. Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $63,557 and $73,249, respectively.28

Research and development – Pursuant to ASC 730, ~~Research~~ Research and Development, research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and Development expense for the six ~~three~~ months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 were $14,~~496~~505 and $4774,~~797~~125, respectively.

Inventories - Inventories consisting of parts, materials, and assemblies are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method.

Stock-based compensation - We adopted ASC 718-10-25, using the modified-prospective-transition method on February 7, 2008. Under this method, we are required to recognize compensation cost for stock-based compensation arrangements with employees and directors based on their grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, such cost to be expensed over the compensations’ respective vesting periods. For awards with graded vesting, in which portions of the award vest in different periods, we recognize compensation costs over the vesting periods using the straight-line method. For calculating the value for warrants, the Black-Scholes method is also used.

Inherent in determining the fair value of options are several judgments and estimates that must be made. These include determining the underlying valuation methodology for share compensation awards and the related inputs utilized in each valuation, such as our expected stock price volatility, expected term of the options granted to employees and consultants, expected dividend yield, the expected risk-free interest rate, the underlying stock price and the exercise price of the option. Changes to these assumptions could result in different valuations for individual share awards. The company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted to employees, non-employee directors and non-employee consultants.

Revenue recognition – Revenues from the sales of RoboticValet and rack and rail systems will be recognized using the percentage of completion method, whereby revenue and the related gross profit is determined by comparing the actual costs incurred to date for the project to the total estimated project costs at completion.

Project costs generally include all material and shipping costs, our direct labor, subcontractor costs and an allocation of indirect costs related to the direct labor. Changes in the project scope, site conditions, staff performance and delays or problems with the equipment used on the project can result in increased costs that may not be billable or accepted by the customer and a loss or lower profit from what was originally anticipated at the time of the proposal.

When the current estimate of total contract costs exceeds the ~~current~~ current estimate of total contract revenues, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is made. Losses are recognized in the period in which they become evident under the percentage-of-completion method. The loss is computed on the basis of the total estimated costs to complete the contract, including the contract costs incurred to date plus the estimated costs to complete. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, itone of our three ongoing projects was estimated ~~that~~to ~~the~~have a gross loss. onOn ~~current~~this ~~contracts~~project, we estimated that the total gross loss would be $3,~~383~~558,~~725~~782. This loss is comprised of $3,~~146~~447,~~045~~439 recognized through the percentage of completion method and $~~237~~111,~~680~~343 as a provision for the remaining loss on ~~contracts~~contract for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015. Revenues of $12,~~688~~350,~~112~~727 and $13,~~040~~336,~~628~~863 have been recognized for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

The Company also engages in engineering and design contracts. Revenue is recognized on these contracts after the services are delivered to the customer.

Warranty Reserves - The Company provides warranty ~~coverage~~ coverage on its products for a specified time as stipulated in its sales contracts. As revenues for contracts are recognized, the Company will record a warranty reserve for estimated costs in connection with future warranty claims associated with those contracts. The amount of warranty reserve is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty and ~~historical~~ historical costs to service warranty claims. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the reserves based on these factors and adjusts the reserve accordingly. The Company incurred warranty expenses relating to its completed projects of $0 and $104,~~157~~893 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

Earnings Per Common Share - We adopted ASC 260. The statement established standards for computing and presenting earnings per share (“EPS”). It replaced the presentation of primary EPS with a basic EPS and also requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding.

Income Taxes - We account for income taxes under ASC 740-10. ASC 740-10 requires an asset and liability approach for financial reporting for income taxes. Under ASC 740-10, deferred taxes are provided for temporary differences between the carrying values of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes at the enacted rates at which these differences are expected to reverse. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return.

Use of Estimates - Management of the Company has made estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, warranty expense, income taxes and percentage of completion contracts. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - We review the long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. To determine if impairment exists, we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from the related long-lived assets to the net carrying amount of such assets. Once it has been determined that an impairment exists, the carrying value of the asset is adjusted to the fair value. Factors considered in the determination of the fair value include current operating results, trends and the present value of estimated expected future cash flows.

Derivative liability - The Company accounts for reset provisions in connection with their issuance of debt, and reset provisions of equity instruments attached to their debt, in accordance with ASC 815 which defines determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is solely indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under ASC 815 the Company is required to (1) evaluate an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions and (2) evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions. The derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value at the end of each reporting period as long as they are outstanding.

Fair Value Measurements - As defined in ASC Topic 820 – 10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 – 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1996

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are largely based on our current expectations and projections about future events and conditions affecting our business, the markets for our products and customer acceptance of our products and conditions in the construction industry. Such forward-looking statements include, in particular, projections about our future results included in our Exchange Act reports, statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business and the markets in which we operate and intend to operate. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “believes”, “can”, “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “projects”, “targets”, “will”, “anticipates”, and similar expressions or variations of these terms and similar phrases. Comments about our critical need for additional capital and our ability to raise such capital when and as needed and on acceptable terms are forward-looking statements. Additionally, statements concerning future matters such as the costs and expenses we expect to incur, our ability to realize material revenues, delays we may encounter in selling our products and gaining market acceptance for our products, the cost of the further development of our products, and achieving enhancements or improved technologies, achieving material sales levels, marketing expenses, projected cash flows, our intentions regarding raising additional capital and when additional capital may be required, and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements. Management cautions that these forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and are subject to business, economic, and other risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of our business or our industry to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation those discussed under Item 1A - Risk Factors on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The cautionary statements should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Form 10-Q and they should also be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including the related footnotes.

2830

Neither management nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and subsequent facts or circumstances may contradict, obviate, undermine, or otherwise fail to support or substantiate such statements. We caution you not to rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business that are addressed in this Form 10-Q. Certain information included in this Form 10-Q may supersede or supplement forward-looking statements in our other Exchange Act reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by applicable law or regulation.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a Smaller Reporting Company, no response is required to this Item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the ~~design~~ design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Company's principal executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure due to our inability to record, process, summarize and report within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer also conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting (“Internal Control”) to determine whether any changes in Internal Control occurred during the quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to materially affect Internal Control. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company conducts periodic evaluations to enhance, where necessary its procedures and controls.

2931

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On March 15, 2013, Crescent Heights R&D, LLC (“Crescent Heights”), filed a complaint against Boomerang in the State of Florida for fraud, breach of contract and specific performance, as well as equitable rescission which alleged an unspecified amount of damages in excess of the purchase price. Boomerang was ~~subsequently~~ subsequently granted a motion to remove this matter to federal court. On May 17, 2013, the court entered an order that our motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings be granted. The parties agreed to arbitrate the matter in front of the American Arbitration ~~Association~~ Association in November 2014. The dispute ~~arises~~arose from a contract to provide a rack and rail automated parking system. Crescent Heights’ claims, Boomerang’s defenses and Boomerang’s affirmative claims all ~~arise~~arose from the contract. On ~~January 23~~April 21, 2015, the arbitrator issued ana ~~Interim~~Final Arbitration Award. The arbitrator denied Crescent Heights’ claims of fraud in the inducement, equitable rescission based on fraud, and declaratory relief to strike the limitation of liability clause, but found Boomerang in Breach ~~breach~~ of ~~contract~~Contract. Crescent Heights was awarded damages of $1,197,~~887~~890, plus ~~reasonable~~ attorneys’ fees and costs~~. We~~ ~~expect~~of ~~the Arbitrator to issue a final arbitration award in April 2015~~$319, 920, which ~~will include~~Boomerang ~~the~~is ~~attorney’s~~required ~~fees~~to ~~and~~pay ~~costs~~in ~~payable~~fiscal byyear ~~Boomerang~~2015. Boomerang established a reserve of $1,~~372~~517,~~887~~810 for the amount of the award, ~~plus reasonable~~ attorneys’ fees and costs.

In addition to the above, we may from time to time become involved in litigation relating to claims arising from the ordinary course of business. These claims, even if not meritous, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On ~~October~~January 913, ~~2014~~2015, ~~October~~the ~~16,~~Company ~~2014~~granted ~~and~~options ~~November~~to ~~18,~~purchase ~~2014~~500,000 shares of common stock of the Company ~~issued~~to ~~warrants~~James toGelly, ~~purchase~~Chief anExecutive ~~aggregate~~Officer, ofoptions ~~634~~to purchase 450,~~508~~000 shares of common stock of inthe ~~connection~~Company ~~with~~to aGeorge ~~draw~~Gelly, ofChief $1Operating Officer,~~364~~ and options to purchase 300,~~460 under~~000 shares of common stock of the ~~Loan~~Company to ~~and~~Mark ~~Security~~Patterson, ~~Agreement~~Chairman.

On October 31January 16, ~~2014~~2015, ~~pursuant~~January ~~to the Exchange Offer~~21, ~~the~~2015 ~~Company issued~~and anJanuary ~~aggregate of 9~~28,~~583,384~~ ~~shares of common stock at $2.15 per share~~2015, the inCompany ~~exchange~~issued ~~for outstanding convertible notes and~~ warrants. ~~Included~~to inpurchase ~~the~~an ~~Exchange~~aggregate ~~Offer was the issuance~~ of 481,~~674~~023,280 shares of common stock in ~~lieu~~connection ofwith ~~cash~~a ~~payments~~draw of $~~104~~2,~~463 for interest earned by noteholders for the quarter ended December 31~~200, ~~2014. These shares of stock were issued at $1.58 per share,~~000 ~~pursuant~~under to the ~~terms~~Loan ~~of the 2011 Notes, 2012 Notes~~ and ~~December~~Security ~~2012 Notes~~Agreement.

On ~~November~~March 1731, ~~2014~~2015, the Company issued ~~options~~an toaggregate ~~purchase 471~~of 2,~~719~~755 shares of common stock ofin ~~the~~lieu ~~Company~~of tocash ~~Mark~~payments ~~Patterson~~of $5,918 ~~former~~for ~~Chief~~interest ~~Executive~~earned ~~Officer,~~by ~~and~~noteholders ~~options~~for tothe ~~purchase~~quarter ~~176~~ended March 31,~~894~~ 2015. These shares of ~~common~~ stock ofwere ~~the~~issued ~~Company~~at to$2.15 ~~Christopher~~per ~~Mulvihill~~share, ~~President.~~pursuant ~~The~~to ~~options~~the ~~were~~terms ~~issued~~of inthe ~~exchange~~2011 ~~for~~Notes anand ~~aggregate of~~2012 ~~$459,643 of deferred compensation~~Notes.

On November 17, 2014, the Company granted options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company to the former Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

The securities sold described above were sold upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, upon reliance on Section 4(2) thereof and/or regulation D promulgated thereunder. No underwriters were employed in any of these transactions. Each of the certificates issued bears or will bear a legend stating that resale of the shares, including shares to be issued on exercise of options and warrants, is restricted without compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act or the availability of an exemption from such registration requirements and stop transfer instructions have been or will be placed with the transfer agent with respect to the transfer of the shares issued.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description	~~Description~~
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
10.1	Promissory Note Agreement between Boomerang Systems, Inc. and SB&G Properties, L.C.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Section 1350 (furnished, not filed)

101 The following materials from Boomerang Systems, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Unaudited, Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six and Three Months Ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, (ii) Unaudited, ~~Consolidated~~ Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and September 30, 2014, (iii) Unaudited, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Three~~ Six Months Ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, and (iv) Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements.*

31*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files included in Exhibit 101 are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC.
Dated: February 17, 2015	By:	/s/ James V. Gelly
Dated: May 15, 2015	By:	/s/ James V. Gelly
	James V. Gelly
	Principal Executive Officer
Dated: February 17, 2015	By:	/s/ Scott Shepherd
Dated: May 15, 2015	By:	/s/ Scott Shepherd
	Scott Shepherd
	Principal Financial Officer
	and Principal Accounting Officer

3233

Filing Compare · Boomerang Systems, Inc.