UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission file number: 000-53668

NETTALK.COM, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida	20-4830633
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

1080 NW 163rd Drive, Miami Gardens, FL	33169
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (305) 621-1200

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that ~~the~~ the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨þ No þ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

The Registrant had ~~121~~177,~~398~~592,~~391~~ 350 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of ~~November~~May 1711, ~~2014.~~2015

NET TALK.COM, INC.

FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT

QUARTER ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER~~MARCH 3031, ~~2014~~2015

INDEX

		Page
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	~~Financial~~FINANCIAL ~~Statements~~STATMENTS	3
	Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013 (Audited)	3
	Balance Sheets at March 31, 2015 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2014 (Audited)	3
	Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	4
	Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	4
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)	5
	Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	5
	Notes to Financial Statements	6
Item 2	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ~~FINANCIAL~~ ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	20
Item 3	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	2826
Item 4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	2826
Part II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	2927
Item 1A	RISK FACTORS	3029
Item 2	UNREGISTERED SALES OF SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	3029
Item 3	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	3029
Item 4	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	3129
Item 5	OTHER INFORMATION	3129
Item 6	EXHIBITS	3130

netTALK.COM, Inc.

Condensed Balance Sheets

	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~147~~227,~~557~~167		$	76372,~~791~~284
Restricted cash		115,530			~~183~~115,~~930~~530
Accounts receivable, net		8528,~~224~~600			~~175~~82,~~157~~739
Inventory		1528,~~131,137~~715			1680,~~126,300~~963
Prepaid expenses		-			91,842
Total current assets		900,012			1,251,516
Total current assets		1,479,448			1,654,020
Property and equipment, net		2,679,093			2,706,426
Property and equipment		2,640,355			2,794,148
Intangible assets, net		71,121			72,195
Intangible assets, net		78,864			116,770
Development costs		450,985			377,172
Development costs		404,860			-
Other assets		29,341			30,589
Other assets		424,190			27,253
Total assets	$	4,130,552		$	4,437,898
Total assets	$	5,027,717		$	4,592,191
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2,~~307~~151,~~462~~564		$	2,~~434~~149,~~952~~333
Accrued expenses		1,~~235~~696,~~476~~313			~~773~~1,~~905~~448,642
Due to Shareholder		5794,~~163~~662			87250,~~583~~912
Deferred revenue		12,~~980~~155,~~775~~714			12,~~857~~056,~~407~~515
Current portion of long-term debt		47,~~483~~334,~~500~~155			14,~~400~~580,000
Total current liabilities		1013,~~064~~432,~~376~~408			610,~~553~~485,~~847~~402
Long term debt		2212,~~996,155~~300			42,~~529~~996,~~278~~155
Total liabilities		13,~~060~~644,~~531~~708			1113,~~083~~481,~~125~~557
Stockholders' deficit:
Common stock, $.001 par value, 300,000,000 authorized, 77,694,391 and 41,324,221 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013		77,703			41,333
Common stock, $.001 par value, 300,000,000 authorized, 125,676,528 and 121,398,391 issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014		125,676			121,398
Additional paid in capital		55,~~104~~299,~~058~~497			55,~~009~~217,~~280~~697
Accumulated deficit		(6364,~~214~~939,~~575~~329	)		(6164,~~541~~382,~~547~~754	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(89,~~032~~514,~~814~~156	)		(69,~~490~~043,~~934~~659	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	54,~~027~~130,~~717~~552		$	4,~~592~~437,~~191~~898

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

netTALK.COM, Inc.

Condensed Statements of Operations(unaudited)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014

Net revenues	$	1,178,466		$	1,175,879

Cost of revenues		491,973			753,455

Gross profit		686,493			422,424

Operating expenses		1,062,384			922,265

Operating loss		(375,891	)		(499,841	)

Interest expense		(179,772	)		(111,210	)

Net loss	$	(555,663	)	$	(611,051	)

Loss per common share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net revenues	$	1,209,473		$	1,491,404		$	3,661,964		$	4,413,763
Cost of revenues		826,226			1,107,261			2,350,857			3,687,895
Gross profit		383,247			384,143			1,311,107			725,868
Operating expenses		901,496			1,129,744			2,588,454			3,778,597
Operating loss		(518,249	)		(745,601	)		(1,277,347	)		(3,052,729	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense		(163,770	)		(365,423	)		(395,682	)		(1,090,377	)
Other income		-			226,145			-			402,122
		(163,770	)		(139,278	)		(395,682	)		(688,255	)
Net loss	$	(682,019	)	$	(884,879	)	$	(1,673,029	)	$	(3,740,984	)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.06	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

netTALK.COM, Inc.

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows(unaudited)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Cash flow used in operating activities:
Net loss	$	(555,663	)	$	(611,051	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Depreciation and amortization		53,256			58,317
Recognition of deferred revenue		(865,554	)		(1,153,526	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivables		54,139			(20,605	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		-			(3,643	)
Inventories		152,248			(103,873	)
Other assets		1,248			-
Deferred revenues		964,753			1,438,954
Accounts payable		58,610			(757,496	)
Accrued liabilities		247,671			55,520
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		110,708			(1,097,403	)
Cash flow used in investing activities:
Restricted cash		-			68,400
Purchase of property and equipment		(25,762	)		-
Development costs		(73,813	)		(149,311	)
Net cash used in investing activities:		(99,575	)		(80,911	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Proceeds from promissory and demand notes		-			1,169,273
Issuance of common stock		-			131,148
Due to shareholder		(156,250	)		90,413
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(156,250	)		1,390,834
Net (decrease) increase in cash		(145,117	)		212,520
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning		372,284			76,791
Cash and cash equivalents, ending	$	227,167		$	289,311
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	$	42,000		$	42,000
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-
Non-cash transactions:
Issuance of common stock from conversion of convertible notes	$	29,700		$	-
Cancellation of convertible notes	$	-		$	500,000
Reduction of accounts payable from Telestrata agreement	$	-		$	928,782
Conversion of demand notes to Telestrata promissory note	$	-		$	837,373
Issuance of common stock in payment of legal fees	$	56,379		$	-

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013
Cash flow used in operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,673,029	)	$	(3,740,984	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Depreciation and amortization		212,695			225,825
Amortization of debt discount		-			703,575
Exercise of net share settled warrants		-			126,955
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivables		89,933			295,492
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(300,511	)		131,835
Inventories		(4,837	)		321,408
Other assets		(4,584	)		-
Deferred revenues		123,369			(307,551	)
Accounts payable		(127,490	)		5,526
Accrued liabilities		461,571			604,093
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,222,883	)		(1,633,826	)
Cash flow used in investing activities:
Restricted cash		68,400			(271	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(20,996	)		(8,446	)
Development costs		(404,860	)		-
Investment in intangible assets		-			(28,043	)
Net cash used in investing activities:		(357,456	)		(36,760	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Proceeds from promissory and demand notes		1,550,377			1,407,272
Issuance of common stock		131,148			-
Proceeds from mortgage payable		-			400,000
Payments of demand notes		-			(112,185	)
Due to shareholder		(30,420	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,651,105			1,695,087
Net increase in cash		70,766			24,501
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning		76,791			96,347
Cash and cash equivalents, ending	$	147,557		$	120,848
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	$	126,000		$	119,600

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

NET TALK.COM, INC.

Notes to Unaudited ~~Condensed~~ Financial Statements

Note 1 – Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

Description of Business

NET TALK.COM, INC. (“~~NetTalk~~netTALK” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 1, 2006 under the laws of the State of Florida, under the name Discover Screens Inc. On September 10, 2008 the Company changed its name to ~~NetTalk~~NETTALK.~~com~~COM ~~Inc~~INC. WeThe ~~are~~company is a ~~telephone~~leading ~~company~~ultra-low ~~who~~cost ~~provides,~~provider ~~sells~~of ~~and~~home ~~supplies~~phone ~~commercial~~ and ~~residential~~smartphone ~~telecommunication~~communications. ~~services,~~netTALK’s ~~including~~global ~~services~~communications ~~utilizing~~network ~~voice~~supports ~~over~~its ~~internet~~flagship ~~protocol~~products ~~(“VoIP”)~~which ~~technology,~~are ~~session initiation~~the ~~protocol~~DUO ~~(“SIP”)~~home ~~technology,~~phone ~~wireless fidelity technology, wireless maximum technology, marine satellite~~service ~~services technology,~~ and ~~other~~CONNECT ~~similar~~mobile ~~type technologies~~apps. ~~Our~~The ~~main~~DUO ~~offerings~~home ~~are~~phone ~~(1)~~service ~~analog~~provides ~~telephone~~local ~~adapters~~and ~~(“Device~~long ~~or Devices”)~~distance ~~that~~calling ~~provide~~throughout ~~connectivity~~the ~~for~~United ~~analog~~States ~~telephones~~and Canada and ~~faxes~~the tocomplementary ~~home,~~CONNECT ~~home~~mobile ~~office~~apps orprovide ~~corporate~~a ~~local~~unified ~~area~~communications ~~networks (“LAN”).~~experience ~~Our~~whether ~~Devices~~at ~~and~~home or on-the-go. ~~telecommunication~~The ~~services~~company provides ~~are~~this ahigh ~~cost~~tech, ~~effective~~easy ~~solution~~to ~~for~~use ~~individuals, small businesses~~ and ~~telecommuters~~ultra-low ~~connecting~~cost toservice ~~any~~with ~~analog~~just ~~telephone,~~one ~~fax~~bill oronce ~~private~~a ~~branch exchange (“PBX”)~~year. ~~Our~~Additionally, ~~Devices~~the ~~provide~~company ~~one~~leverages ~~USB~~its ~~port,~~extensive ~~one~~call ~~Ethernet~~termination ~~port~~agreements ~~and~~to ~~one~~offer ~~analog~~wholesale ~~telephone~~call ~~port.~~terminations Ato ~~full~~other ~~suite~~carriers of– ~~internet~~powered ~~protocol~~by ~~features~~its iscarrier grade ~~available~~and toproprietary ~~maximize universal~~VoIP ~~connectivity~~switching platform. InThe ~~addition,~~company ~~analog~~believes ~~telephones~~everyone ~~attached~~should tohave ~~our~~access ~~Device~~to ~~are~~easy ~~able~~ to use, ~~advanced~~affordable ~~calling features such as~~home ~~call~~and ~~forwarding, caller ID, 3~~on-~~way~~the-go ~~calling,~~digital ~~call~~phone ~~holding,~~service ~~call~~around ~~retrieval,~~the ~~and call transfer~~world.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed interim financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for reporting of interim financial information. Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. However, the unaudited condensed interim financial information includes all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented. The operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future fiscal quarters of 2015, for the year ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015, or for future periods. The significant accounting principles used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed interim financial statements are the same as those used in the preparation of the annual audited financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014, and other Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Note 2 - Going Concern and Liquidity

We have never sustained profits and our losses could continue. Without sufficient additional capital to repay our indebtedness as it matures, we may be required to significantly scale back our operations, significantly reduce our headcount, seek protection under the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and/ or discontinue many of our activities which could negatively affect our business and prospects. Our current efforts to raise capital may not be successful on terms ~~favorable~~satisfactory to the Company, or at all.

We ~~recorded~~incurred net losses of $~~682~~555,~~018~~663 and 1$611,~~673,029~~051 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014,~~2015 ~~compared to net losses of $884,879~~ and 32014,~~740,984~~ ~~for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,~~ respectively. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we had $26,~~996~~146,~~155~~455 in ~~long term~~ debt, after deducting applicable discount, of which $35,~~083~~934,~~500~~455 inis ~~short~~current ~~promissory~~and ~~notes~~we ~~and~~had $1,400,000 in a short term mortgage payable. The Company raised approximately $~~138~~3,~~500~~ 000,000 in secured and convertible promissory notes in ~~the~~2014. ~~third~~As ~~quarter~~of ~~and~~March ~~have~~31, a2015, ~~commitment~~we ~~for~~had annegative ~~additional~~working capital of $~~400~~12,~~000.~~532,396

Our current cash resources, together with anticipated cash flows from operating activities, may not be sufficient to fund our operations or debt that is maturing in ~~November~~2015 ~~29, 2014~~ or that is due on demand. In light of these circumstances, we are seeking additional capital through public or private debt or equity financing. However, there are no assurances that those efforts will be successful or that additional capital will be available on terms that do not adversely affect our existing stockholders or restrict our operations, if it is available at all.

Also, any equity financing would likely be substantially dilutive to our stockholders, particularly in light of the prices at which our common stock has been recently trading. In addition, if we raise additional funds through the sale of equity securities, new investors could have rights senior to our existing stockholders. The terms of any future financings may restrict our ability to raise additional capital, which could delay or prevent the further development or marketing of our products and services. Our need to raise capital before the repayment of our debt becomes due may require us to accept terms that may harm our business or be disadvantageous to our current stockholders.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared and are presented assuming the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred significant recurring losses from operations and is dependent on outside sources of funding for continuation of its operations. Our independent registered public accounting firm issued its report dated ~~May~~April 715, ~~2014~~2015, in connection with the audit of our financial statements as of December 31, ~~2013~~ 2014, that included an emphasis of a matter paragraph describing the existence of conditions that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

In order to address the need to satisfy its continuing obligations and realize its long term strategy, management has been reviewing various strategic alternatives and has taken several steps and is considering additional actions to improve its operating and financial results, which we hope will be sufficient to provide the Company with the ability to continue as a going concern, including the following:

· AsEstablish aand ~~result~~build ofstrategic ~~the~~alliances ~~redemption~~ and ~~debt~~partnerships ~~restructuring~~with ~~agreement~~companies ~~(“Redemption~~offering ~~Agreement”),~~complimentary weproducts restructured the Company’s debt on December 31, 2013 resulting in the extinguishment of $13,662,615 of debt, $436,234 of accrued interest, $1,601,116 accrued dividends, cancelled 19,995,092 shares of common stock and ~~cancelled~~services ~~common~~providing ~~stock~~synergies ~~purchase warrants exercisable~~ for ~~76,864,250~~those ~~shares of the Company’s common stock~~involved.

· WeLeverage ~~identified~~our ~~key~~extensive ~~vendors~~call ~~and~~termination ~~developed~~agreements ~~strategic~~to ~~alliances~~offer ~~whereby~~wholesale ~~the~~call ~~Company~~terminations ~~has~~to ~~reduced~~other ~~its~~carriers ~~cost~~– ofpowered ~~providing~~by ~~telecom~~its ~~service~~carrier grade and ~~extended~~proprietary ~~the~~VoIP ~~due~~switching ~~dates of certain promissory notes to March 1, 2016~~platform.

· WeRental ~~have~~of ~~implemented~~available ~~more~~collocations ~~stringent~~space ~~credit and collection procedures and controls~~ in anour ~~attempt~~data tocenter ~~reduce~~as ~~days~~well ~~outstanding~~as ofavailable ~~trade~~space ~~accounts~~on ~~receivable~~our ~~and~~telecommunications ~~improve working capital~~tower.

· WeAggressively ~~eliminated~~pursue 26new ~~employees~~revenue ~~and~~by ~~reduced~~utilizing ~~costs~~our ~~during~~mobile ~~2013~~applications for use by ~~$1,164,000~~our current and future subscriber base.

· The Company entered into an engagement agreement with a New York based registered broker/dealer whereby the broker/dealer will represent the Company as its placement agent and financial advisor in connection with raising equity and or debt financing.

There can be no assurance that the actions outlined above will be successful or any new financing or equity infusion will be available or that we could obtain any such arrangements on terms suitable to us. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty.

Note 3 - Summary of Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies used in preparing the Company’s financial statements and recent accounting pronouncements that may impact our financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and footnotes. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include developing fair value measurements upon which to base our accounting for acquisitions of intangible assets and issuances of financial instruments, including our common stock. Our estimates also include developing useful lives for our tangible and intangible assets and cash flow projections upon which we determine the existence of, or the measurements for, impairments, allowance for billing adjustments, doubtful accounts and allocation of prices between device and telecom services.

Our estimates and assumptions are based on experience, historical trends identified by management, telecommunications industry trends and the overall economic condition in the United States and abroad. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, and the differences could be material.

Risk and Uncertainties

Our future results of operations and financial condition will be impacted by the following factors, among others: dependence on the worldwide telecommunication markets characterized by intense competition and rapidly changing technology, on third-party manufacturers and subcontractors, on third-party distributors in certain markets, on the successful development and marketing of new products in new and existing markets. Generally, we are unable to predict the future status of these areas of risk and uncertainty.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is generated from product sales, telecom services, shipping and handling charges and leasing cell tower and co-location rack space in our operations center. All revenues are recognized in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition and SAB 104 as follows: when evidence of an arrangement exists, in the case of products, when the product is shipped to a customer, or in the case of telecom services, when the service is used by the consumer, when the fee is fixed or determinable and amounts are collectible from the customers.

Revenue is recognized for a device sale when the product is shipped and the customer is invoiced for retail sales and when the customer completes the transaction for internet sales. Revenue for telecom service is recognized prorata monthly as the service is used and revenue for shipping costs billed to customers are included as a component of product sales. The associated cost of shipping is included as a component of cost of product sales.

Deferred Revenue

The initial sale of our Device includes telecom service ranging from 1 month to 12 months. The revenue that is telecom is recognized ratably monthly as the service is used. The portion of the telecom service prepaid is recorded as deferred revenue. Subsequent renewals for telephone service are amortized over the corresponding number of months in the call plan.

International calls are billed as earned from our customers. International calls are prepaid and customers account is debited as minutes are used and earned.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid cash balances and debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We maintain cash balances inonly in domestic ~~and Canadian~~ bank ~~accounts;~~ ~~the balances in our domestic~~ accounts, ~~may~~which at times, may exceed ~~the~~ FDIC limits. ~~Management~~of ~~believes~~$250,000. ~~cash~~Our ~~and~~ cash ~~equivalent~~ balances ~~are~~occasionally ~~not~~exceed ~~exposed~~the toFDIC ~~significant~~limits during ~~credit~~the ~~risk~~year ~~due~~but todid ~~the~~not ~~financial~~exceed ~~position of~~ the ~~depository~~FDIC ~~institutions~~limit inat ~~which~~March ~~these deposits~~31, ~~are held~~2015.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in first-out method. Obsolete inventory is reserved for, asif ~~determined~~necessary, and there is zero reserve at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment includes acquired assets which consist of network equipment, computer hardware, furniture and purchased and internally developed software. All of our equipment is stated at cost with depreciation calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of related assets, which range from three to thirty-five years. The costs of repairs and maintenance is charged to operating expenses unless it increases the assets useful life more than one year.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets includes trademarks, patents and employee agreements. All of our intangible assets are stated at cost with amortization calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of related assets, which range from two to twenty years. The costs of repairs and maintenance is charged to operating expenses unless it increases the asset’s useful life more than one year.

Impairments and Disposals

We evaluate our tangible and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently in the presence of circumstances or trends that may be indicators of impairment. Our evaluation is a two-step process. The first step is to compare our undiscounted cash flows, as projected over the remaining useful lives of the assets, to their respective carrying values. In the event that the carrying values are not recovered by future undiscounted cash flows, as a second step, we compare the carrying values to the related fair values and, if lower, record an impairment adjustment. For purposes of fair value, we generally use replacement costs for tangible fixed assets and discounted cash flows, using risk-adjusted discount rates for intangible assets.

Software Development Costs

The Company develops software for both internal and external use. The following describes netTALK’s policies and procedures regarding expensing versus capitalizing software development costs.

We capitalize costs of software to be sold, leased or marketed in accordance with FASB ASC 985-20. We account for our software development costs as costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product and are charged to expense when incurred as research and development until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or completion of a working model. Capitalization of costs stops when the product is available for general release to customers at which point the capitalized costs are amortized over the software’s useful life.

We capitalize costs for internally developed software in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40. Costs incurred in the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. Preliminary project stage includes conceptual formulations and evaluation of alternatives, determination of existence of needed technology and final selection of alternatives. Costs incurred in the application development stage are capitalized as incurred and includes design of chosen path, configuration, coding, installation of hardware, and testing. Capitalization stops after software implementation at which point the capitalized costs are amortized over the software’s useful life.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we capitalized development costs of approximately $149,000 and $74,000.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Share-Based Payment Arrangements

NetTalk adopted a 2010 Stock Option Plan, a 2011 Stock Option Plan and a 2012 Stock Option Plan (the "Plans") which are intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key individuals by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives, thereby better aligning the interests of our employee and consultants with those of the Company. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provide bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the Company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plans. The shares are compensatory in nature and are fully vested upon issuance. We value the shares consistent with fair value at the time of issuance including adjustments for certain restrictions and limitations.

Share–based compensation cost to employees is recorded as compensation expense and is recognized over the service period. Share–based payments to non–employees are recorded as consulting expense and is recognized over the service period.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Financial instruments, as defined in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825 Financial Instruments, consist of cash, evidence of ownership in an entity, and contracts that both (i) impose on one entity a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial instrument to a second entity, or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially unfavorable terms with the second entity, and (ii) conveys to that second entity a contractual right (a) to receive cash or another financial instrument from the first entity, or (b) to exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the first entity. Accordingly, our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, secured convertible debentures, and derivative financial instruments. The carrying amounts of debt obligations approximate their fair values as the terms are comparable to terms currently offered by local lending institutions for arrangements with similar terms to industry peers with comparable credit characteristics.

We carry cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities at historical costs since their respective estimated fair values approximate carrying values due to their current nature. We also carry convertible debentures at historical cost.

Derivative financial instruments, as defined in ASC 815-10-15-83 Derivatives and Hedging, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.

Property and Equipment

Property, equipment and telecommunication equipment includes acquired assets which consist of buildings, network equipment, computer hardware, furniture, and software. All of our equipment is stated at cost with depreciation calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of related assets, which ranges from three to five years. The costs associated with major improvements are capitalized while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to operating expenses.

Intangible Assets

Our intangible assets were recorded at acquisition cost, which encompassed estimates of their respective and their relative fair values, as well as estimates of the fair value of consideration that we issued. We amortize our intangible assets using the straight-line method over lives that are predicated on contractual terms or over periods we believe the assets will have utility.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is generated from product sales, telecom services, shipping and handling charges, leasing cell tower space and leasing co-location rack space in our operations center. All revenues are recognized in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition and SAB 104 as follows: when evidence of an arrangement exists, in the case of products, when the product is shipped to a customer, or in the case of telecom services, when the service is used by the consumer, when the fee is fixed or determinable and amounts are collectible from the customers.

Revenue is recognized for a device sale when the customer is invoiced for retail sales and when the customer completes the transaction for internet sales. Revenue for telecom service is recognized prorata monthly as the service is used and revenue for shipping costs billed to customers are included as a component of product sales. The associated cost of shipping is included as a component of cost of product sales.

Deferred Revenue

International calls are billed as earned from our customers. International calls are prepaid and customers account is debited as minutes are used and earned.

Impairments and Disposals

We evaluate our tangible and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently in the presence of circumstances or trends that may be indicators of impairment. In performing our review, we estimate the future net cash flows from the assets and compare this amount to the carrying value. If this review indicates the carrying value may not be recoverable, impairment losses are measured and recognized based on the difference between the estimated discounted cash flows and over the remaining life of the assets and the assets carrying value.

Research and Development: We capitalize costs of software to be sold, leased or marketed in accordance with FASB ASC 985-20. We expense research and development costs as they are incurred. We account for our software development costs as costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product and are charged to expense when incurred as research and development until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or completion of a working model. Capitalization stops when the product is available for general release to customers

We capitalized development costs of $404,860 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Capitalized cost will be amortized over the software’s expected useful life. These products are not available for general release to customers or for internal use by the Company and thus, are not being amortized.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years financial statements in order to conform to the current quarter’s presentation.

~~Share-Based~~Financial ~~Payment~~instruments, ~~Arrangements~~as defined in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825 Financial Instruments, consist of cash, evidence of ownership in an entity, and contracts that both (i) impose on one entity a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial instrument to a second entity, or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially unfavorable terms with the second entity, and (ii) conveys to that second entity a contractual right (a) to receive cash or another financial instrument from the first entity, or (b) to exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the first entity. Accordingly, our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, secured convertible debentures, and derivative financial instruments. The carrying amounts of debt obligations approximate their fair values as the terms are comparable to terms currently offered by local lending institutions for arrangements with similar terms to industry peers with comparable credit characteristics.

We ~~apply~~carry ~~the~~cash ~~grant~~and ~~date~~cash ~~fair~~equivalents, ~~value method to our share–based~~accounts ~~payment~~receivable, ~~arrangements~~accounts ~~with~~payable ~~employees~~ and ~~consultants.~~accrued ~~Share–based~~liabilities ~~compensation cost to employees is measured~~ at ~~the~~historical ~~grant date.~~costs ~~Fair~~since ~~value~~their isrespective ~~based~~estimated onfair ~~the~~values ~~value~~approximate carrying ofvalues ~~the~~due ~~award~~to ~~and~~their iscurrent ~~recognized over the service period~~nature. ~~Share–based~~ ~~payments to~~We ~~non–employees~~also ~~are~~carry ~~recorded~~convertible atdebentures ~~fair value on the measurement date~~ and ~~reflected~~redeemable inpreferred ~~expense~~stock ~~over~~at ~~the service period~~historical cost.

~~NetTalk~~Derivative ~~stock~~financial ~~option~~instruments, ~~plans~~as ~~are intended to~~defined ~~advance~~in ~~the~~ASC ~~interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract~~815-10-15-83, ~~retain~~“Derivatives and ~~motivate key~~Hedging”, ~~individuals~~consist byof ~~providing~~financial ~~such~~instruments ~~persons~~or ~~with~~other ~~equity~~contracts ~~ownership~~that ~~opportunities~~contain ~~and performance-based incentives, thereby better~~a ~~aligning~~notional ~~the~~amount ~~interests~~and ofone ~~such~~or ~~persons~~more ~~with~~underlying ~~those of the Company’s shareholders~~(e.g. ~~All~~interest ~~of the Company’s employees~~rate, ~~officers, directors,~~security ~~consultants~~price ~~and~~or ~~advisors~~other ~~that~~variable), ~~are~~require ~~(i)~~no ~~natural~~initial ~~persons~~net investment and ~~(ii)~~permit ~~who~~net ~~provide~~settlement. ~~bona~~Derivative ~~fide~~financial ~~services~~instruments tomay ~~the~~be ~~Company~~free-standing ~~not~~or ~~connected to~~embedded ain ~~capital~~other ~~raising~~financial ~~transaction~~instruments. orFurther, derivative ~~the~~financial ~~promotion~~instruments orare ~~creation~~initially, ofand asubsequently, ~~market~~measured ~~for~~at ~~the~~fair ~~Company’s~~value ~~securities, are~~and ~~eligible to~~recorded beas ~~granted~~liabilities ~~options~~ or, ~~restricted~~in ~~stock~~rare instances, ~~awards under the Plans~~assets.

Certain ~~Risks~~risks and ~~Concentration~~concentration

Our primary manufacturer accounted for approximately 2420% ~~and~~ ~~21%~~ of our cost of ~~revenues~~goods sold for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013. Our primary telecom service provider which is owned by the current President of the Company~~2014, ~~accounted~~respectively. ~~for~~And ~~approximately 35% of~~ our ~~cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Our~~ primary telecom service provider ~~which was not owned by the current President,~~ accounted for approximately 25% ofand ~~our~~36% of cost of ~~revenues~~goods sold for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~2015 and 2014, respectively.

One of our customers presently operates under a consignment agreement. Under ~~this~~the agreement, we sell and ship merchandise to our customer, and ~~recognize~~collect ~~revenues~~payments asupon wethe sale ~~collect~~of ~~payments~~our ~~from the~~product ~~customer~~to ~~which~~the ~~assures~~ultimate ~~our~~(final) ~~collectability~~consumer.

~~Loss~~Redeemable ~~per~~Preferred ~~common share~~Stock

~~Basic~~Redeemable ~~earnings~~preferred ~~(loss) per~~stock ~~share~~ is ~~calculated~~initially byevaluated ~~dividing~~for ~~net income (loss) attributable to the Company available to common stockholders by the weighted~~possible ~~average~~classification ~~number~~as ofliabilities ~~common~~under ~~shares~~ASC ~~outstanding~~480 ~~for~~Distinguishing ~~the~~Liabilities ~~three~~from ~~months~~Equity. ~~and~~Redeemable ~~nine~~preferred ~~months~~stock ~~ended~~that ~~September~~does 30not, ~~2014~~in its ~~and~~entirety, ~~2013. Diluted~~require ~~earnings~~liability ~~per~~classification ~~share~~is ~~reflects~~evaluated ~~the~~for ~~potential~~embedded ~~dilution~~features that ~~could~~may ~~occur~~require ifbifurcation ~~securities~~and orseparate ~~other contracts to issue common stock~~classification ~~were~~as ~~exercised~~derivative orliabilities ~~converted~~under ~~into~~ASC ~~common~~815. ~~stock~~In orall ~~resulted~~instances, in the ~~issuance~~classification of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~redeemable ~~that~~preferred ~~then~~stock ~~shared~~host incontract ~~the earnings of the~~that ~~Company.~~does Innot ~~accordance~~require ~~with~~liability ~~ASC~~classification ~~260,~~is ~~the~~evaluated ~~effect~~for ofequity ~~potentially~~classification ~~dilutive~~or ~~securities~~mezzanine isclassification ~~not~~based ~~considered~~upon ~~during~~the ~~periods~~ nature of ~~loss or if~~ the ~~effect~~redemption ~~is anti-dilutive~~features. WeGenerally, ~~compute~~any ~~the~~feature ~~effects~~that oncould ~~diluted~~require ~~loss~~cash ~~per~~redemption ~~common~~for ~~share~~matters ~~arising~~not ~~from~~within ~~warrants~~our ~~and~~control, ~~options~~irrespective ~~using~~of ~~the~~probability ~~treasury stock method or, in the case~~ of ~~liability classified warrants,~~ the ~~reverse~~event ~~treasury stock method. If required~~occurring, we ~~compute~~requires ~~the~~classification ~~effects~~outside onof ~~diluted~~stockholders’ ~~loss per common share arising from convertible securities using the if-converted method~~equity.

~~Income~~Loss ~~Taxes~~per Common Share

WeBasic ~~record~~loss ~~our~~per ~~income~~common ~~taxes~~share ~~using~~represents ~~the~~our ~~asset~~loss ~~and~~applicable to ~~liability~~common ~~method.~~shareholders ~~Under~~divided ~~this~~by ~~method,~~ the ~~future~~weighted ~~tax~~average ~~consequences~~number ~~attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts~~ of ~~existing~~common ~~assets~~shares ~~and~~outstanding ~~liabilities~~during ~~and~~the ~~their~~period. ~~respective~~Diluted ~~tax~~loss ~~basis~~per ~~are reflected as tax assets and~~common ~~liabilities~~share ~~using~~gives ~~enacted~~effect ~~tax rates expected~~ to ~~apply~~all topotentially ~~taxable~~dilutive ~~income~~securities. inWe compute the ~~years~~effects inon ~~which~~diluted ~~those~~loss ~~temporary~~per ~~differences reverse.~~common ~~Changes~~share inarising ~~these~~from warrants ~~deferred tax assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~options ~~are~~using ~~reflected in~~ the ~~provision~~treasury ~~for~~stock ~~income~~method ~~taxes. However~~or, ~~we are~~in ~~required to evaluate~~ the ~~recoverability~~case of ~~net~~liability ~~deferred~~classified ~~tax assets. If it is more likely than not that some portion of a net deferred tax asset will not be realized~~warrants, ~~a valuation allowance is recognized with a charge to~~ the ~~provision~~reverse ~~for~~treasury ~~income~~stock ~~taxes~~method. ~~Utilization~~We ofcompute the ~~Company’s~~effects ~~net~~on ~~operating~~diluted loss ~~may~~per becommon ~~subject~~share toarising afrom ~~substantial~~convertible ~~annual~~securities ~~limitation~~using the if-converted ~~there is an~~method. ~~ownership~~The ~~change~~effects asare ~~set~~all ~~fourth~~anti-dilutive inand ~~Internal~~are ~~Revenue Code Section 382~~excluded.

~~Recent~~Patent ~~accounting pronouncements~~Costs

InAssets ~~May~~are ~~2014,~~probable ~~the~~future ~~FASB~~economic ~~issued~~benefits obtained as a ~~standard~~result of onpast ~~revenue~~transactions ~~recognition that~~or ~~provides~~events. aLegal ~~single,~~fees ~~comprehensive~~and ~~revenue~~other ~~recognition~~costs ~~model~~incurred for ~~all~~successfully ~~contracts~~defending ~~with~~a ~~customers.~~patent ~~The~~from ~~standard~~infringement isare ~~principle-based~~considered ~~and~~deferred ~~provides~~legal acosts ~~five-step~~in ~~model to determine~~ the ~~measurement~~sense ofthat ~~revenue~~they ~~and~~are ~~timing~~part of ~~when~~the itcost isof ~~recognized.~~retaining ~~The~~and ~~core~~obtaining ~~principle is~~the ~~that~~future aeconomic ~~company~~benefit ~~will~~of ~~recognize~~the patent ~~revenue~~as toper ~~reflect~~Statement ~~the transfer~~ of ~~goods~~Accounting orConcept ~~services~~No. to6. ~~customers~~If atdefense anof ~~amount that~~ the ~~company expects~~patent tolawsuit beis ~~entitled~~expected to inbe ~~exchange~~successful, ~~for~~costs ~~those~~may ~~goods~~be capitalized orto ~~services.~~the ~~This~~extent ~~standard~~of isan ~~effective~~evident ~~for~~increase ~~our~~in ~~interim~~the ~~and~~value ~~annual~~of ~~reporting periods~~the ~~beginning~~patent ~~after~~per ~~December~~TIS ~~15,~~Section ~~2016~~2260. ~~and~~On ~~allows~~February ~~for~~27, ~~either~~2015, ~~full~~all ~~retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption.~~claims Weand ~~will~~counterclaims ~~adopt~~have ~~this~~been ~~guidance~~dismissed onand, ~~January~~as 1,a ~~2017~~result, ~~and~~the ~~are~~deferred ~~currently~~legal ~~evaluating~~costs ~~the~~have ~~impact~~been onexpensed ~~our~~as ~~condensed~~of ~~consolidated~~December ~~unaudited financial~~31, ~~statements~~2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued standard ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, that provides a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers. The standard is principle-based and provides a five-step model to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. This standard is effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. We will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2017, and are currently evaluating the impact on our financial statements.

Note 4 – Accounts Receivable

Trade accounts receivable consisted of the following at:

	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
Accounts receivable, gross	$	~~125~~85,~~969~~462		$	~~304~~137,~~501~~411
Allowance for returns and doubtful accounts		(4056,~~745~~862	)		(~~129~~54,~~344~~672	)
Total	$	85,224		$	175,157
Accounts receivable, net	$	28,600		$	82,739

Note 5 – Inventory

~~Inventory~~Inventories, ~~consisted~~recorder at lower of ~~the~~cost ~~following~~or atmarket, are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,		December 31,
	2014		2013
	2015		2014
Raw materials	$	~~178,998~~-	$	~~721,914~~-
Finished goods		~~952~~528,~~139~~715		~~404~~680,~~386~~963
Total	$	1528,~~131,137~~715	$	1680,~~126,300~~963

Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market. Of our total finished goods inventory, at ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~ 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014, $7220,~~317~~889 and $~~105~~35,~~658~~711, respectively, is held on consignment at one of our distributors.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, there were no write-downs of obsolete inventory.

Note 6 – Property and equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following at:

	Estimated	~~September~~March 3031,			December 31,
	Useful Life	~~2014~~2015			~~2013~~2014
Telecommunication equipment	7	$	~~370~~392,~~045~~966		$	~~356~~373,~~154~~089
Computer equipment	5		171,659			~~169~~171,~~754~~659
Building	35		2,448,364			2,448,364
Building improvements	10		8691,~~442~~414			86,442
Office equipment and furnishing	7		5348,~~412~~212			48,212
Purchased software	3		34,147			34,147
Purchased and developed software	3		124,728			124,728
Land			270,000			270,000
			3,434,069			3,413,073
			3,547,343			3,522,494
Less: accumulated depreciation			(~~793~~868,~~714~~250	)		(~~618~~816,~~925~~068	)
Property and equipment, net		$	2,~~640~~679,~~355~~093		$	2,~~794~~706,~~148~~426

Our property and equipment is located in our network operations center and corporate offices which are housed in the same building. Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $60,307 and $174,789, respectively. Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $58,678 and $178,238, respectively.

Our property and equipment is located in our network operations center and corporate offices which are housed in the same building. Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $52,182 and $57,242, respectively.

Note 7 - Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following at:

	Estimated	~~September~~March 3031,			December 31,
	Useful Life	~~2014~~2015			~~2013~~2014
Trademarks National and International	5	$	332,708		$	332,708
Employment agreements	3		225,084			225,084
Knowhow and specialty skills	3		212,254			212,254
Workforce	3		54,000			54,000
Patents	20		93,747			93,747
Finance cost	2		83,280			83,280
			1,001,073			1,001,073
Less: accumulated amortization			(~~922~~929,~~209~~952	)		(~~884~~928,~~303~~878	)
Intangible assets, net		$	7871,~~864~~121		$	~~116~~72,~~770~~195

Amortization expense for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014 was $12,636~~ 2015 and ~~$37~~2014,~~906,~~ ~~respectively. Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013~~ was $121,~~165~~074 and $4711,~~587~~075, respectively.

Note 8 – Debt Restructuring, Promissory Notes and Mortgage Payable

Debt Restructuring

The Company executed a redemption and debt restructuring agreement with Vicis Capital Master Fund ("Vicis") to, among other things, extend the term of our loans to September 30, 2014 with two additional one year extensions if accrued interest is paid in full, and reduce the overall loan with Vicis from approximately $17,000,000 to $3,000,000. The restated loan ~~accrued~~accrues interest at six percent (6%) per annum. In addition, pursuant to the redemption and restructuring agreement, all shares and derivative securities held by Vicis including the series A convertible redeemable preferred stock, 19,995,092 shares of the Company’s common stock, and common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 76,864,250 shares of common stock have been returned to the Company and cancelled. The holders received no additional consideration to effect the modification.

The approximately $14,000,000 extinguishment of debt was recorded as an equity transaction and the cancelled securities have been reflected as a reduction of the related shares of preferred and common stock and other securities as of December 31, 2013. The result was a decrease to common stock of $19,995 and an increase to additional paid-in capital of $14,098,847 from the extinguishment of debt, $5,000,000 from the write-off of preferred stock and $1,601,116 from the write-off of preferred stock dividends.

Phoenix Vitae Holdings, LLC (“PV”), which is ~~owned~~ owned by the CEO of the Company, purchased the 6%, $3,000,000 secured promissory note from Vicis Capital Master Fund July 7, 2014. PV extended the interest payment date for the initial interest payment from June 30, 2014 to September 1, 2014. On September 1, 2014, a note amendment agreement was entered into whereby, the note is due on demand and the interest rate and terms are as follows: Interest on the principal amount (or any balance thereof) outstanding from time to time under this Note shall begin to accrue on the September 1, 2014 and shall accrue at a fixed rate per year equal to six percent (6.00%); provided, however, interest shall accrue at a fixed rate per year equal to nine percent (9.00%) during the period from July 1, 2014 through August 31, 2014; and provided further, that interest shall accrue at a fixed rate per year equal to twelve percent (12.0%); from and after September 1, 2014 until the Note is paid in full (in each case, computed on the basis of a 360-day year).

On August 21, 2014, Net Talk.Com, Inc. (“the Company”) issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) to JMJ Financial (“JMJ”), an accredited investor, in the aggregate principal amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for an aggregate purchase price of up to four-hundred and fifty thousand ($450,000) dollars (“Aggregate Purchase Price”).

JMJ paid initial consideration of $50,000 and may, at JMJ’s discretion, pay additional consideration, up to an amount equal to the Aggregate Purchase price. The principal sum due to JMJ shall be prorated based upon the amount of consideration actually paid by JMJ to the Company (plus an approximate 10% original issue discount that is prorated based upon the amount of consideration actually paid by JMJ to the Company) such that the Company is only required to repay the amount actually funded by JMJ.

The Note is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of $0.17 or 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion date. The Company has the right, in its discretion, to enforce a “Conversion Floor” equal to $0.10 per share, which, if enforced by the Company, shall require the Company to make whole any loss suffered by JMJ in the form of cash payment, as further described in the Amendment to the Note, attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2 (the “Amendment”).

The Note has a maturity date of August 21, 2016. If the Company repays any then outstanding principal amount due to JMJ prior to the date 90 days following the issue date (the “Interest Date”) of the Note, the interest on such amount shall be 0%. If the Company repays any then outstanding principal amount due to JMJ after the Interest Date, such amount shall be charged with a one-time 12% interest charge.

The Note was offered and sold to an accredited investor in a private placement transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933.

On September 24, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with KBM Worldwide, Inc. (“KBM”) pursuant to which the Company issued an 8% Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) to KBM, an accredited investor, in the principal amount of eighty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($83,500) for a purchase price of eighty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($83,500).

The Note is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company common stock, par value $0.001 per share, based on the conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the average of the lowest five (5) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) days prior to the date of conversion, as further described in the Note, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2. Interest accrues at 8% per annum and is due at maturity date which is September 11, 2015.

Demand, Promissory and Convertible Notes

Long term debt consisted of the following at:

	September 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
$3,000,000, 6% secured promissory note, due on demand	$	3,000,000		$	3,000,000
$1,400,000, 12% mortgage note, due November 29, 2014		1,400,000			1,400,000
$1,400,000, 12% mortgage note payable, due November 29, 2015		1,400,000			1,400,000
$300,000, 5% secured convertible note, due December 1, 2013		-			300,000
$2,766,155, 5% secured promissory note, due March 1, 2016		2,766,155			2,766,155
$200,000, 5% secured convertible note, due January 15, 2014		-			200,000
$2,766,155, 5% secured promissory note, due March 1, 2016		2,766,155			-
$175,000, 6% promissory note, due June 30, 2017		175,000			175,000
$500,000 12% convertible promissory note, due August 21, 2016		5537,~~000~~300			55,000
$83,500 8% convertible promissory note, due September 19, 2015		8371,500			83,500
$854,278, demand notes, due on demand		-			854,278
$43,000 8% convertible promissory note, due November 21, 2015		43,000			43,000
Total		7,479,655			5,929,278
$53,500 8% convertible promissory note, due December 29, 2015		53,500			53,500
Less current portion		(4,483,500	)		(1,400,000	)
		7,546,455			7,576,155
Long-term debt	$	2,996,155		$	4,529,278
Less current portion		(7,334,155	)		(4,580,000	)
Long-term debt	$	212,300		$	2,996,155

OnPromissory March 11, 2014, the Company executed a secured promissory note with Telestrata LLC (“Telestrata”), a Colorado limited liability for $4,071,940. Interest accrues at 5% and the note and interest are payable March 1, 2016 subject to accelerated repayment terms as defined in the promissory note agreement. In the second quarter of 2014, the principle balance of the note has increased $500,000 as provided by the promissory note agreement of which $250,000 was additional cash payments and $250,000 was additional indirect cash payments for telecom service received from an affiliate of Telestrata. This affiliate is owned by the President of the Company. The Company is obligated to repay all such amounts advanced by Telestrata; provided, the Company is entitled to reduce the principal by up to a maximum of $1,805,785 if the Company makes timely principal and interest payments as required by the promissory note.Notes

Effective March 11, 2014, netTALK and Telestrata LLC (“Telestrata”), a Colorado limited liability company executed a restricted stock and warrant purchase agreement, pursuant to which, in part, Telestrata purchased: (a) 25,441,170 shares of the Company’s common stock and (b) a common stock purchase warrant entitling Telestrata to purchase shares of common stock of the Company equal to 20% of the then outstanding shares of common stock of netTALK.

Subject to repayment obligations of the Company as provided below, Telestrata received credit of $4,071,940 to acquire shares and warrant as follows: (a) $500,000 in the form of the conversion and cancellation of two promissory notes issued to Samer Bishay in May and July 2013, (b) $837,374 in loans to the Company received in the third and fourth quarters of 2013 and (c) the satisfaction by Telestrata of $2,734,566 of liabilities of the Company.

On March 11, 2014, the Company executed a secured promissory note with Telestrata for $4,071,940. Interest accrues at 5% and the note and interest are payable March 1, 2016, subject to accelerated repayment terms as defined in the promissory note agreement. The principal balance of the note increased $500,000 based on additional payments, as defined in the promissory note agreement. As of June 30, 2014, the Company received $250,000 of additional cash payments and $250,000 of additional indirect cash payments for telecom service received from an affiliate of Telestrata. This affiliate is owned by the previous President of the Company. These amounts were added to the original principal balance resulting in a new principal balance of $4,571,940 less the discount of up to $1,805,785. The promissory note provides for a discount of up to a maximum of $1,805,785 if the Company makes timely principal and interest payments as required by the promissory note. Advanced payments are required based on certain conditions with qualified financing as defined in the Secured Promissory Note.

Reconciliation of Telestrata Promissory Note at:

	March 31,
	2015
Original secured promissory note due to Telestrata	$	4,071,940
Less promissory note discount		(1,805,785	)
Increase in principal from additional cash payment		250,000
Increase in principal from indirect cash payment for telecom service		250,000
Revised secured promissory note due to Telestrata	$	2,766,155

On August 21, 2014, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (“Note 1”) to a third party accredited investor, in the aggregate principal amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for an aggregate purchase price of up to four-hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($450,000) (“Aggregate Purchase Price”). The investor paid initial consideration of $50,000 and may, at its discretion, pay additional consideration, up to an amount equal to the Aggregate Purchase price. The principal sum due to investor shall be prorated based upon the amount of consideration actually paid by investor to the Company (plus an approximate 10% original issue discount that is prorated based upon the amount of consideration actually paid by investor to the Company) such that the Company is only required to repay the amount actually funded by investor.

~~Reconciliation~~Note 1 is convertible, at the option of ~~Teletrata~~the ~~promissory~~holder, ~~note~~into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at: a conversion price equal to the lesser of $0.17 or 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion date. The Company has the right, in its discretion, to enforce a “Conversion Floor” equal to $0.10 per share, which, if enforced by the Company, shall require the Company to make whole any loss suffered by investor in the form of cash payment, as further described in the Amendment to the Note. In the first quarter of 2015, the investor converted $17,700 of debt into 1,550,000 shares of netTALK common stock.

	September 30,
	2014
Secured promissory note due to Telestrata	$	4,071,940
Less promissory note discount		(1,805,785	)
Plus additional cash payment		250,000
Plus additional indirect cash payment for telecom service		250,000
Total	$	2,766,155

Note 1 has a maturity date of August 21, 2016. If the Company repays any then outstanding principal amount due to investor prior to the date 90 days following the issue date (the “Interest Date”) of the Note, the interest on such amount shall be 0%. If the Company repays any then outstanding principal amount due to investor after the Interest Date, such amount shall be charged with a one-time 12% interest charge.

On ~~May~~September 3124, ~~and July 15~~2014, ~~2013,~~ the Company ~~issued~~entered tointo ~~Samer~~a ~~Bishay,~~Securities ~~the~~Purchase ~~current~~Agreement ~~president~~(“SPA”) ofwith ~~the Company and~~ a ~~related~~third party, ~~two~~accredited 5%investor ~~secured~~pursuant ~~convertible~~to ~~promissory~~which ~~notes~~the ~~with~~Company ~~face~~issued ~~values~~an of8% ~~$300,000~~Convertible ~~and~~Promissory ~~$200,000,~~Note ~~respectively.~~(“Note ~~These~~2”) ~~notes~~to ~~were~~the ~~due~~investor onin ~~December~~the 1,principal ~~2013~~amount ~~and January 15, 2014, respectively, and were convertible into shares~~ of ~~the~~eighty-three ~~Company’s~~thousand ~~common~~five ~~stock~~hundred atdollars ~~a rate of~~ ($~~0.08 per share~~83, 500) for a ~~total~~purchase price of ~~3,750,000~~eighty-three ~~and~~thousand ~~2,500,000~~five ~~common~~hundred ~~shares~~dollars ($83, ~~respectively~~500). ~~These~~In ~~notes had a second priority security interest, junior in priority only to~~ the ~~holder of the~~ first ~~priority interest,~~quarter ~~to all real property~~ of ~~the~~2015, ~~Company and any and all cash proceeds and/or noncash proceeds of any of~~ the ~~foregoing,~~investor ~~including,~~converted ~~without limitation~~$12,000 ~~insurance~~of ~~proceeds,~~debt ~~and~~into ~~all supporting obligations and the security therefore or for any right to payment. On March 11~~1, ~~2014~~318,681 ~~these~~shares ~~notes were converted and cancelled as part~~ of ~~the~~netTALK ~~promissory~~common ~~note due to Telestrata as discussed above~~stock.

Note 2 is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company common stock, par value $0.001 per share, based on the conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the average of the lowest five (5) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) days prior to the date of conversion, as further described in the Note. Interest accrues at 8% per annum and is due at maturity date which is September 11, 2015.

On November 19, 2014, the Company entered into a SPA with a third party accredited investor pursuant to which the Company issued an 8% Convertible Promissory Note (“Note 3”) to the investor in the principal amount of forty-three thousand dollars ($43,000) for a purchase price of forty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($43,000).

Note 3 is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company common stock, par value $0.001 per share, based on the conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the average of the lowest five (5) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) days prior to the date of conversion, as further described in Note 3. Interest accrues at 8% per annum and is due at maturity date which is November 19, 2015.

On December 29, 2014, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a third party accredited investor pursuant to which the Company issued an 8% Convertible Promissory Note (“Note 4”) to the investor in the principal amount of fifty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($53,500) for a purchase price of fifty-three thousand five hundred dollars ($53,500).

Note 4 is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company common stock, par value $0.001 per share, based on the conversion price equal to 65% multiplied by the average of the lowest five (5) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) days prior to the date of conversion, as further described in Note 4. Interest accrues at 8% per annum and is due at maturity date which is December 29, 2015.

Notes 1, 2, 3 and 4 were offered and sold to accredited investors in a private placement transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933.

During 2014, the CEO (and shareholder) loaned the Company $575,000 in non-interest bearing demand notes of which all was repaid to the CEO as of March 31, 2015. Additionally, the CEO was repaid $87,583 in back-pay that was accrued in 2013. Also, the Company accrued $94,662 relating to the voluntary reduction in the CEO’s cash compensation which is due to the CEO as of March 31, 2015.

During the first and second quarters of 2013, the Company received advances of $175,000 from a third party. These advances are evidenced by a promissory note, accrues interest at 6% per year, and matures June 30, 2017.

On May 31, and July 15, 2013, the Company issued to Samer Bishay, previous President of the Company, two 5% secured convertible promissory notes with face values of $300,000 and $200,000, respectively. These notes were due on December 1, 2013 and January 15, 2014, respectively, and were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.08 per share, for a total of 3,750,000 and 2,500,000 common shares, respectively. These notes had a second priority security interest, junior in priority only to the holder of the first priority interest, to all real property of the Company and any and all cash proceeds and/or noncash proceeds of any of the foregoing, including, without limitation, insurance proceeds, and all supporting obligations and the security therefor or for any right to payment. On March 11, 2014, these notes were converted and cancelled as part of the promissory note due to Telestrata as discussed above.

During the third and fourth quarters of 2013, the Company received $521,000, for working capital from a now related party. On March 11, 2014, these demand notes were converted to the promissory note due to Telestrata as discussed above.

During the first, second and third quarters of 2013, amounts totaling $137,185 was advanced to the Company as a short term loan from the CEO. As of December 31, 2013, all loans have been repaid by the Company and the Company owed the CEO $87,583 in back-pay.

During the first and second quarters of 2013, the Company received advances of $175,000 from a third party. These advances are evidenced by a promissory note that accrues interest at 6% per year and matures June 30, 2017.

In the first quarter of 2014, the CEO loaned the Company and the Company repaid $100,000 and the Company accrued the CEO’s cut in compensation of $18,750 and repaid back-pay of $29,250. In the second quarter of 2014, the CEO loaned the Company $300,000 and the Company accrued the CEO’s cut in compensation of $18,750 and repaid back-pay of $58,333. In the third quarter of 2014, the CEO was repaid $300,000 by the Company, the Company accrued the CEO’s cut in compensation of $18,750 and the amount due to the CEO at September 30, 2014 is $57,163.

Mortgage Payable

On November 29, 2012, the Company borrowed $1,000,000 from a lender and in exchange, the Company issued a 12% promissory note and a mortgage and security agreement. The 12% promissory note, among other matters, accrues interest at 12% per annum, is payable in full on November 29, 2014, and is secured by our corporate office building, located at 1080 NW 163^rd Drive, Miami Gardens, FL 33169. We are working with the lender to extend the maturity date of the mortgage payable. See footnote 14 for further discussion.

On January 11, 2013, we received an additional advance of $400,000 pursuant to its existing lending facility with 1080 NW 163rd Drive, LLC. The additional advance of $400,000 was endorsed by a promissory note which was consolidated with the initial advance of $1,000,000 from the mortgage on 1080 NW 163rd Drive, LLC. The consolidated promissory mortgage note has an aggregate principal balance of $1,400,000, accrues interest at 12% per annum, is payable in full on November 29, ~~2014~~2015, and is secured by our corporate office building, located at 1080 NW 163rd Drive, Miami Gardens, FL 33169. ~~Even though we cannot refinance the mortgage payable as discussed in footnote 14, the Company is working with the lender to extend the maturity date of the mortgage payable.~~

Note 9 – Revenue and Cost of Revenues

Revenues and cost of revenues consisted of the following at:

	Three Months End September 30,				Nine Months End September 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Revenues:	2015		2014
Revenues:
Sales of devices	$	41,598	$	167,793
Sales of devices	$	175,572	$	304,952	$	519,131	$	1,152,547
Renewals and access charges		1,087,306		967,591
Renewals and access charges		954,412		1,092,001		2,972,486		3,070,198
Other		49,562		40,495
Other		79,490		94,451		170,347		191,018
Total		1,178,466		1,175,879
Total		1,209,474		1,491,404		3,661,964		4,413,763
Cost of revenues:
Cost of revenues:
Cost of sales of devices		152,246		283,672
Cost of sales of devices		322,145		413,196		853,968		1,222,873
Cost of renewals and access charges		339,727		469,783
Cost of renewals and access charges		412,846		609,500		1,348,564		2,178,512
Total		491,973		753,455
Other		91,235		84,565		148,325		286,510
Gross profit	$	686,493	$	422,424
Total		826,226		1,107,261		2,350,857		3,687,895
Gross profit	$	383,248	$	384,143	$	1,311,107	$	725,868

Note 10 - Share-Based Payment Arrangements

OnNetTalk ~~July~~adopted ~~25,~~a ~~2012~~2010 Stock Option Plan, ~~the~~a ~~Company~~2011 ~~adopted~~Stock ~~the~~Option Plan and a 2012 Stock Option Plan (the ~~”Plan”~~"Plans"). ~~The~~which ~~maximum~~are ~~number~~intended ofto ~~shares~~advance the interests of the Company’s ~~common~~shareholders by ~~stock~~enhancing ~~that~~the ~~may~~Company’s beability ~~issued under~~to ~~the~~attract, ~~Plan~~retain isand ~~20,000,000.~~motivate ~~The~~key ~~Plan~~individuals isby ~~intended~~providing tosuch ~~advance~~persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives, thereby better aligning the interests of our employee and consultants with those of the Company’s. ~~shareholders~~All byof ~~enhancing~~ the Company’s ~~ability~~employees, ~~to attract~~officers, ~~retain~~and directors, and ~~motivate~~those ~~individuals~~Company’s ~~who~~consultants and ~~make~~advisors (ori) that are ~~expected~~natural topersons ~~make~~and (ii) ~~important~~who ~~contributions~~ provide bona fide services to the Company bynot ~~providing~~connected ~~such~~to ~~individuals~~a ~~with~~capital ~~equity~~raising transaction ~~ownership~~or ~~opportunities~~the ~~and~~promotion ~~performance-based~~or ~~incentives~~creation of a market for the Company’s securities, ~~thereby~~are ~~better~~eligible to be granted options or ~~aligning~~restricted stock awards under the ~~interests~~Plans. ofThe ~~such~~shares ~~persons~~are compensatory in nature and are fully vested upon issuance. We value the shares consistent with ~~those~~fair ofvalue at the ~~Company’s~~time ~~shareholders.~~of issuance including adjustments for certain restrictions and limitations

~~All~~Share–based ofcompensation ~~the~~cost ~~Company’s employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors that are (i) natural persons and (ii) who provide bona fide services~~ to ~~the~~employees ~~Company~~is ~~not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the~~recorded ~~Company’s~~as ~~securities, are~~compensation ~~eligible~~expense ~~to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The shares are compensatory in nature~~ and ~~are~~is ~~fully~~recognized ~~vested~~over ~~upon issuance. We have valued~~ the ~~shares~~service ~~consistent with fair value at the time of issuance including and adjusted for ownership restrictions~~period. ~~The~~Share–based ~~Company~~payments ~~issued 781,500 shares of common stock in 2012 and 10,929,000 share of common stock in the first quarter of 2014~~ to ~~management and~~ non–employees. ~~The~~are ~~expense related to these~~recorded ~~shares~~as ~~were~~consulting ~~$131,148~~expense and ~~were~~is ~~debited~~recognized inover ~~compensation expenses, additional paid in capital was credited for $120,219 and common stock was credited for $10,929. Also,~~ the ~~Company~~service ~~issued a common stock purchase warrant entitling management to purchase shares of common stock of the Company equal to 20% of the then outstanding shares of common stock of netTALK~~period.

Note 11 - Issuance of Common Stock and Warrants

Pursuant to the stock and warrant purchase agreement effective March 11, 2014 (the “Stock Agreement”), Telestrata acquired (a) 25,441,170 shares of the Company’s common stock and (b) a common stock purchase warrant entitling Telestrata to purchase shares of common stock of the Company equal to 20% of the then outstanding shares of common stock of netTALK. Concerning the acquisition of the shares and warrant, Telestrata agreed to fund and/or refinance as follows: (a) $500,000 in the form of the conversion and cancellation of two promissory notes issued to Samer Bishay in May and July 2013, (b) $837,373 in loans to the Company received in the third and fourth quarters of 2013, (c) the satisfaction by Telestrata of $2,734,566 of liabilities of the Company and (d) $500,000 of future cash payments and indirect cash payments for telecom services to be received from an affiliate of Telestrata. As described in Note 8 above, the Company is obligated to repay all such amounts advanced by Telestrata; provided, the Company is entitled to a reduce the principal by up to a maximum of $1,805,785 if the Company makes timely principal and interest payments as required by the promissory note. The Company was also able to restructure the past due principal owed to its largest creditor as a result of obtaining this new debt capital provided by Telestrata. The Debt Restructuring is also described in Note 8 above.

Note 12 – Conversion of Warrants to Common Shares

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, 4,231,832 warrants were converted into 1,057,958 common shares of netTALK. The share price of netTALK common stock on the day of conversion was $0.12; resulting in a charge of $126,955 included within general and administrative expenses in the Statements of Operations.

~~Note~~In 13the -first ~~Related~~quarter ~~Party~~of ~~Transactions~~2014, the Company issued 10,929,000 share of common stock under the Plan to management and employees. The compensation expense related to these shares is $131,148. Additional paid in capital was credited for $120,219 and common stock was credited for $10,929. No shares were issued in the first quarter of 2015.

~~During~~Also, in the first, ~~second~~quarter ~~and third quarters~~ of ~~2013~~2014, ~~amounts totaling $137,185 were advanced to~~ the Company asissued a ~~short~~common ~~term~~stock ~~loan~~purchase ~~from~~warrant ~~the~~entitling ~~CEO.~~management Asto ofpurchase ~~December~~shares ~~31,~~of ~~2013,~~common ~~all~~stock ~~loans~~of ~~have been repaid by~~ the Company ~~and~~equal to 20% of the ~~Company~~then ~~owed~~outstanding ~~the~~shares ~~CEO~~of ~~$87,583~~common instock ~~back-pay~~of netTALK.

InNote ~~the~~11 ~~first quarter of 2014, the CEO loaned the Company and the Company repaid $100,000 and the Company accrued the CEO’s cut in compensation of $18,750 and repaid back~~-~~pay~~ ofIssuance ~~$29,250. In the second quarter~~ of ~~2014,~~Equity the CEO loaned the Company and the Company repaid $300,000 and the Company accrued the CEO’s cut in compensation of $18,750 and repaid back-pay of $58,333. The amount due to the CEO at September 30, 2014 is $57,163.Securities

~~The~~Effective ~~Company’s~~March ~~president~~11, ~~owns~~2014, ~~100%~~netTALK ofand Telestrata LLC (“Telestrata”), a ~~vendor~~Colorado ~~that~~limited ~~provides~~ liability company executed a ~~significant~~restricted ~~portion~~stock ofand ~~our~~warrant ~~telecom~~purchase ~~service.~~agreement, ~~Also~~pursuant to which, ~~the~~in ~~President~~part, ~~owns~~Telestrata purchased: (a) ~~significant~~25,441,170 ~~portion~~shares of ~~Telestrata~~the ~~who~~Company’s ~~purchased~~common anstock ~~interest~~and (b) a common stock purchase warrant entitling Telestrata into purchase share of common stock of the Company onequal ~~March~~to ~~11,~~20% ~~2014.~~of ~~See~~the ~~notes~~then 8outstanding ~~and~~shares 11of ~~for~~common ~~further~~stock ~~discussion~~of netTALK.

~~The~~Also, ~~Chief~~in ~~Operating~~the ~~Officer~~first isquarter ~~related~~of to2014, the ~~CEO~~Company ~~and~~issued ~~was~~a ~~promoted~~common stock purchase warrant entitling management to ~~COO~~purchase ~~January~~shares 1,of ~~2014~~common bystock of the ~~Board~~Company equal to 20% of ~~Directors~~the then outstanding shares of common stock of netTALK.

~~Phoenix~~On ~~Vitae~~October ~~Holdings~~15, ~~LLC~~2014, ~~(“PV”)~~Telestrata, ~~which~~exercised ~~is owned~~its bywarrant ~~the~~for ~~CEO~~19,424,000 shares of ~~the~~netTALK ~~Company,~~common ~~purchased~~stock. ~~the~~This ~~6%,~~issuance ~~$3,000,000~~was ~~secured~~recorded ~~promissory~~as ~~note~~a ~~from~~debit ~~Vicis~~to ~~Capital~~interest ~~Master~~expense ~~Fund~~for ~~on July 7~~$69,926, ~~2014. The parties executed~~ a ~~note~~credit ~~amendment~~to ~~agreement~~common ~~September~~stock for 1$19,424 ~~2014 whereby the note is due on demand~~ and ~~interest~~a ~~is accruing~~credit atto ~~12%~~additional ~~annually.~~paid ~~See~~in ~~footnote~~capital 8 for ~~further discussion on the note and terms~~$50,502.

On October 16, 2014, management exercised its warrant for 24,280,000 shares of netTALK common stock. This issuance was recorded as a debit to compensation expense for $87,408, a credit to common stock for $24,280 and a credit to additional paid in capital for $63,128.

In the third and fourth quarters of 2014, the Company issued four convertible promissory notes totaling $235,000. Each of these notes were offered and sold to accredited investors in a private placement transaction made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933. See footnote 8 for further discussion. In the first quarter of 2015, investors converted approximately $29,700 in convertible debt into 2,868,681 shares of common stock. These issuances were recorded as a debit to convertible debt for $29,700, a credit to common stock for $2,869 and a credit to additional paid in capital for $26,831.

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company has issued 1,409,456 of shares of common stock as payment for $56,378 in legal fees. This issuances were recorded as a debit to accounts payable for $56,378, a credit to common stock for $1,409 and a credit to additional paid in capital for $54,969.

Note 12 - Related Party Transactions

Iristel, Inc. (“Iristel”), a vendor that previously provided a significant portion of netTALK’s telecom service in 2013 and 2014, is owned by Samer Bishay, who was President and member of the board of directors of netTalk.com, Inc. until removed from the board of directors by a majority of the Company’s shareholders on November 26, 2014. Mr. Bishay also owns and or controls Telestrata, LLC (“Telestrata”), a debt and equity holder of netTalk.com, Inc., a significant portion of which debt and equity was issued in full settlement of amounts due to Iristel.

On October 10, 2014, Mr. Bishay caused Iristel to terminate all its contracts with netTalk.com, Inc. On October 17, 2014, Mr. Bishay, purporting to act as President of netTalk.com, Inc., attempted to cause netTalk.com, Inc. to reinstate one of its contracts with Iristel, which he had previously caused Iristel to terminate. The Company continues to deny that the reinstatement was effective.

On or about October 24, 2014, Mr. Bishay, despite being obviously conflicted, despite acting without authorization and against the wishes of the board of directors, and despite the absence of the Company seal, filed an unauthorized mortgage on certain real property of the Company, in favor of Telestrata, which he owns and or controls. The Company is continuing to dispute that mortgage.

On November 5, 2014, Telestrata filed an action against the company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida titled: Telestrata, LLC v. netTalk.com., Inc. et al., 1:14-cv-24137. See footnote 14 for further discussion.

~~Note~~As 14a –continuation ~~Subsequent~~of ~~Events~~these ongoing attempts to tortiously damage the Company and its shareholders, Mr. Bishay, through Iristel and Telestrata, is attempting to overstate, or completely misstate, the amounts owed by the Company. The Company has accrued and recorded the amounts it believes are owed to Iristel. The Company completely denies the validity of any such claims, and intends to vigorously pursue Iristel, Telestrata and Mr. Bishay for the damage any such misstatements may cause.

OnThe ~~October~~Chief ~~10,~~Operating ~~2014,~~Officer ~~the~~is ~~Company~~related received a termination letter from its primary vendor, Iristel (owned by, and with its CEO being, the President of NetTALK), which provides telecommunications service and phone numbers (“DID”), with respect to ~~two contracts between Iristel and~~ the ~~Company,~~ ~~one~~CEO ~~dealing with carriage~~ and ~~one~~was ~~dealing with DIDs. Upon being informed of the termination, the Company~~promoted ~~ported its carriage~~ to aCOO ~~new~~January ~~carrier~~1, ~~and informed Iristel that, pursuant to its rights under the DID contract, it would port the DIDs promptly to a new provider. On October 17,~~ 2014, ~~Samer~~by ~~Bishay, current President of~~ the ~~Company~~Board ~~and CEO~~ of ~~Iristel,~~ purporting to act on behalf of both the Company and Irisitel, without conflict waivers of any sort, attempted to agree to rescind the termination of the DID contract, which neither Iristel nor the Company had the power to doDirectors. ~~The Company continues to attempt to shift the DIDs to new carriers, but Iristel, through Samer Bishay, the President of the Company, refuses to allow these customers to be moved to new DID vendors.~~

OnPhoenix ~~October~~Vitae 15Holdings, ~~2014,~~LLC ~~Telestrata~~(“PV”), which is owned by orthe ~~controlled~~CEO ~~by three~~(and ~~members~~shareholder) of the ~~NetTalk~~Company, ~~board~~purchased ofthe ~~directors~~6%, ~~exercised its warrants for 19~~$3,~~424~~000,000 ~~shares~~secured ofpromissory ~~netTALK~~note ~~common~~from ~~stock. On October~~Vicis ~~16,~~Capital ~~(1)~~Master ~~members~~Fund on ofJuly ~~management exercised their warrants for 24~~7,~~280,000~~ ~~shares~~2014. ofThe ~~netTALK~~parties ~~common~~executed ~~stock~~a ~~and~~note ~~(2) shareholders~~amendment ~~representing~~agreement ~~more~~September ~~than~~1, a2014 ~~majority~~whereby of the ~~then~~note ~~outstanding~~is ~~common~~due ~~stock~~on ofdemand ~~the~~and ~~Company voted, via written consent~~interest inis ~~lieu~~accruing ofat a12% ~~meeting,~~annually. toSee ~~remove~~footnote ~~each~~8 offor ~~Samer~~further ~~Bishay~~discussion ~~(President),~~on ~~Maged~~the ~~Bishara,~~note and ~~Nardir Aljasrawi from their positions as members of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Removal")~~terms.

~~The~~During ~~Removal~~2014, ~~will~~the ~~become~~CEO ~~effective~~(and ~~approximately~~shareholder) ~~(but~~loaned ~~not~~the ~~less~~Company $575,000 ~~than)~~in 20non-interest ~~days~~bearing ~~after~~demand notes of which $400,000 was repaid to the ~~filing~~CEO as of ~~definitive~~December ~~information~~31, ~~statement~~2014. Additionally in 2014, the CEO was repaid $87,583 in back-pay that was accrued in 2013 and ~~its~~the ~~mailing~~Company accrued $75,000 relating to the ~~Company'~~voluntary reduction in the CEO’s ~~stockholders~~cash compensation. As of December 31, 2014, the amount due to the CEO was $250,912. In the first quarter of 2015, the Company repaid $175,000 to the CEO and accrued an additional $18,750 in voluntary compensation reduction.

OnNote ~~October~~13 ~~27,~~– ~~2014,~~Subsequent Company was notified that Samer Bishay, current President of the Company, on or about October 24th, 2014, through counsel for Telestrata, LLC, an entity with which he is affiliated, unilaterally filed a mortgage in the amount of approximately $4.5 million, encumbering certain real property of the Company. The Company's Board of Directors (the "Board"), through a unanimous written consent executed September 2, 2014, by all directors including Mr. Bishay, authorized the company to undertake such action only under certain conditions, including the condition that only the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, could execute and authorize any such filing. Such written consent has not been revoked, modified or superseded by any subsequent valid action of the Board, and accordingly, the Company is working with counsel to rescind such unauthorized encumbrance and pursue any causes of action it or it shareholders may have against Mr. Bishay.Events

AsAn aexisting ~~result~~investor ofinvested ~~this~~an ~~unauthorized~~additional ~~encumbrance~~$25,000 atinto ~~this~~the ~~time~~Company in the ~~Company~~second isquarter ~~unable~~of to2015 ~~refinance~~through the ~~mortgage~~purchase ~~payable~~of ~~that~~convertible ~~matures~~debt. ~~November~~And ~~29,~~existing ~~2014.~~investors Weconverted ~~are~~debt ~~working~~in ~~with~~the ~~lender to~~amount ~~extend~~of ~~the~~$94,108 ~~maturity~~into ~~date~~46,325,278 shares of ~~the~~netTALK ~~mortgage~~common ~~payable~~stock at various conversion rates in April and May 2015.

~~The~~Also, the Company ~~hired~~issued a5,590,544 ~~consultant~~shares ~~effective~~of ~~October~~common 1,stock ~~2014~~ to ~~assist management~~legal ~~with~~counsel ~~strategic~~as ~~planning~~payment ~~and~~for ~~raising~~$223,622 ~~capital~~in legal fees.

The Company has entered into contracts with various telecom vendors in the fourth quarter of 2014 with an annual commitment of approximately $118,000 and a total commitment of approximately $205,000 as defined in the agreement.

Note 1514 – Commitments and Legal Proceedings

Employment Agreements

On January 2, 2014, the Company entered into employment agreements with the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technical Officer according to the following terms. Stated salary for 2014 and 2015, a term of 2 to 5 years and a change in control payment, as defined in the agreements. These employment agreement have an annual commitment of $750,000 for 2015 and $625,000 for 2016 through 2018 and a total commitment of $2,625,000.

Commitments

The Company ~~entered~~has ~~into~~commitments ~~an engagement agreement~~ with avarious ~~New~~telecom ~~York~~vendors ~~based~~providing for ~~registered~~telecom ~~broker/dealer~~and ~~whereby~~related ~~the~~services. ~~broker/dealer~~The ~~will~~Company ~~represent~~has ~~the~~an ~~Company~~annual ascommitment ~~its~~of ~~placement agent~~approximately $307,400 and ~~financial~~a ~~advisor~~total incommitment ~~connection~~of ~~with~~approximately $490,300 ~~raising~~as ~~equity~~defined ~~and~~in orthe ~~debt financing~~agreements.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~entered~~middle ~~into~~of a2013, ~~contract~~the ~~with~~Company aencountered severe financial ~~telecom~~difficulties. ~~vendor~~As ina result, the ~~third~~Company ~~quarter~~became delinquent on filing and paying certain taxes. As of ~~2014~~the ~~with~~date anof ~~annual~~this filing, the ~~commitment~~Company ofis ~~approximately~~working ~~$168~~to complete all filing obligations required by federal,~~000~~ ~~and~~state, acounty, ~~total~~city ~~commitment~~or locality jurisdictions. As of March ~~approximately~~31, 2015, the Company has accrued $~~336~~727,000 asfor ~~defined~~taxes, penalties and interest which is recorded in ~~the~~accrued ~~agreement~~expenses.

Legal Proceedings

On April 4, 2012, MagicJack Vocaltec Ltd. filed a complaint in United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Civil Action No.: 9:12-cv-80360-DMM, against the Company, alleging patent infringement, seeking injunctive relief and damages as a result of the alleged patent infringement. The Company answered the complaint, denying all of its material allegations, asserting a number of affirmative defenses, and seeking counterclaims for declaratory relief. The Company’s patent counsel has provided an opinion that the NetTalk DUO does not infringe their patent. MagicJack Vocaltec Ltd. and NetTalk filed a Joint Stipulation and motion for the dismissal. Effective November 2012, the federal court has dismissed the entire case with prejudice, including all claims, counterclaims, defenses and causes of action.

On September 21, 2012, NetTalk.com, Inc. filed a complaint in United States District Court ~~For~~for the Southern District of Florida, Civil Action No.: 9:12-cv-~~81022~~810220-CIV-MIDDLEBROOK/BRANNON, ~~against~~ against MAGICJACK VOCALTECLTD, MAGIJACK HOLDINGS CORPORATION f/k/a YMAX HOLDINGS CORPORATION and DANIEL BORISLOW. In the complaint we allege patent infringement by the defendants and are seeking injunctive relief and two hundred million dollars ($200,000,000) in damages as a result of the alleged patent infringement by defendants. There can be no assurances as to the outcome of this litigation.

As a result of this action, MAGICJACK/ VOCALTEC LTC filed a document with the United States Patent Office (“USPTO”) requesting reexamination of netTALK patent 8,243,722. The USPTO granted the reexamination petition and the claim against MAGICJACK/VOVALTEC LTD was stayed pending the outcome of the USPTO reexamination.

In December 2013, netTALK received a USPTO Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (“NIRC”) for netTALK’s U.S. Patent Number 8,243,722.

In January 2014, netTALK petitioned the courts to restart the aforementioned lawsuit against MAGICJACK VOCALTECLTD, MAGIJACK HOLDINGS CORPORATION f/k/a YMAX HOLDINGS CORPORATION and DANIEL BORISLOW.

On February 27, 2014, netTALK received the reexamination certificate which restated that all three claims of the ‘722 Patent are deemed allowable by the USPTO. The three claims of the ‘722 Patent were minimally amended during the proceeding.

On ~~September~~February 1427, ~~2012~~2015, aby ~~supplier~~stipulation toof the ~~Company~~parties, ~~Arrow Electronics,~~ ~~Inc. (“Arrow”), filed a complaint in~~ the ~~United~~district ~~States~~court ~~District~~dismissed ~~Court~~all ~~for~~claims ~~the~~and ~~Southern~~counterclaims ~~District~~in ofnetTALK ~~Florida,~~v. magicJack (Case No.: 19:12-cv-~~23366-FAM~~ 810220, ~~alleging~~Dkt. ~~breach~~#158.) On ofFebruary ~~contract~~27, 2015, by ~~the~~stipulation ~~Company~~of ~~and~~the ~~seeking~~parties, ~~damages~~the ofdistrict ~~not~~court ~~less~~dismissed ~~than~~all ~~$473,319~~claims ~~due~~and tocounterclaims ~~such alleged~~in ~~breach~~netTALK v. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~magicJack ~~and~~(Case ~~Arrow~~No. ~~Electronics~~9:12-cv- 810220, ~~Inc~~Dkt. ~~entered~~#158.) ~~into~~On aApril ~~settlement~~24, ~~agreement~~2015, ~~providing~~magicJack ~~for~~filed a motion asking the ~~payment~~district ofcourt ~~past~~to ~~due~~order ~~amounts.~~netTALK Ato ~~final~~pay ~~order~~magicJack’s ~~was~~attorney ~~entered~~fees ~~into~~of onapproximately ~~December~~$2,000,000. 12Under the Patent Statute, ~~2012~~attorney ~~dismissing~~fees may only be awarded in “exceptional” cases, which the ~~litigation.~~Supreme AsCourt ofhas ~~September~~defined 30as being “uncommon,” ~~2014~~“rare,” ~~the Company~~“not ~~owes~~ordinary,” ~~Arrow~~“out ~~approximately~~of ~~$43,790~~the ~~which~~ordinary iscourse,” “unusual,” ~~recorded~~“special,” inor ~~accounts~~“not ~~payable~~run-of-the-mill.”

On ~~November~~September 2614, 2012, a supplier to the ~~Client~~Company, ~~Broadvox,~~Arrow ~~LLC~~Electronics, Inc. (“~~Broadvox~~Arrow”), filed a complaint in the United States District Court offor ~~Common~~the ~~Pleas,~~Southern ~~Cuyahoga~~District ~~County,~~of ~~Ohio~~Florida, Case No.: ~~CV-~~1:12-~~796095~~cv-23366-FAM, alleging breach of contract by the Company and seeking damages of not less than $~~111~~473,~~701~~319 due to such alleged breach. The Company and ~~Broadvox~~Arrow Electronics, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement providing for the payment of ~~all~~ past due amounts. ~~The~~A ~~settlement~~final order was ~~paid~~ inentered ~~full~~into on ~~October~~December 2912, ~~2013~~2012 dismissing the litigation. As of March 31, 2015, the Company owes Arrow approximately $43,790 which is recorded in accounts payable. The Company will continue making installment payments until the obligation is paid in full.

On ~~June~~March 3020, ~~2012,~~2014 a ~~Statement~~claim ~~of Claim~~ was ~~served~~filed by ~~DACS~~Billsoft, ~~Marketing &~~Case ~~Sponsorship Inc~~No. ~~(“DACS”) on NetTalk~~14CV01827.~~com Inc.~~ The claim ~~was~~states ~~for~~the ~~$125,834.21~~Company ~~for amounts DACS claims~~ is ~~owing to~~indebted ~~it pursuant~~ to ~~its~~Billsoft ~~agreement~~in asthe ~~well~~amount asof $~~126~~16,~~000~~776 ~~for~~pursuant ~~general~~the ~~damages~~terms ~~for breach~~ of ~~contract.~~said AContract ~~Statement~~including ~~of Defense was delivered~~$1,192 onfor ~~behalf~~attorney ofand ~~the~~court ~~Company~~fees onincurred ~~August~~by ~~31,~~Billsoft ~~2012,~~for ~~denying~~a ~~all~~total ~~claims~~of $17,968. OnThe ~~November~~Company ~~28,~~has ~~2013,~~reached ~~the~~a ~~Company~~settlement ~~and~~agreement ~~DACS~~on ~~entered~~April 24, ~~into~~2014, ato ~~settlement agreement~~make ~~providing~~monthly ~~for~~payments of $601,000 inuntil 4the ~~monthly~~debt ~~equal~~is ~~installments~~satisfied. The ~~obligation~~balance ~~was~~due ~~paid~~at inMarch ~~full~~31, on2015 ~~February~~is $7,969 ~~2014~~which is recorded in accounts payable.

On orJuly ~~about September 1~~30, ~~2013~~2014, ~~ADP~~Active ~~Total~~Media ~~Source~~Services, ~~filed~~Inc. acommenced ~~lawsuit~~an action against the Company. ~~The~~in ~~claim~~the isUnited States District Court for anthe ~~amount~~Southern ~~not~~District ~~exceeding~~of ~~$90~~New York,~~776~~ ~~for~~Case ~~general~~No. 14-CV-5916. The Complaint filed by the plaintiff seeks $374,803 in damages ~~for~~based ~~alleged~~on the theory of breach of contract. ~~The~~ On September 9, 2014 the Company ~~settled~~answered the ~~with~~complaint. ~~ADP~~The onparties ~~December~~engaged ~~23,~~in ~~2013~~discovery and ~~was~~the ~~making~~discovery ~~monthly~~phase ~~payments~~of the action ended on April 24, 2015. The Court set a deadline of $May 15,~~000,~~ 2015 for the ~~obligation~~submission ~~was~~of ~~paid~~motions ~~in full~~for onsummary judgment, and the trial of ~~May~~this 23action is scheduled to commence on July 27, ~~2014~~2015.

On ~~February~~July 2430, ~~2013~~2014, athe ~~Statement~~Company ~~of Claim~~ was served bywith ~~Sears~~a complaint from ~~Canada~~QVC, Inc. onthat ~~the~~was ~~Company.~~filed ~~The~~in ~~claim~~the isUnited ~~for~~States ~~$24~~District Court,~~131~~ for ~~amounts~~the ~~Sears~~Eastern ~~claims~~District isof ~~owed~~Pennsylvania, toCase itNo.: ~~pursuant~~2:14-cv-04406-LS, alleging tobreach ~~its~~of ~~agreement~~contract ~~under~~by the ~~“Universal~~ ~~Terms~~Company and ~~Conditions~~seeking ~~for~~damages ~~Sears~~of ~~Canada~~no ~~Suppliers”~~less than $95,798. WeAs ~~have~~of ~~settled~~the ~~with~~filing ~~Sears~~date ~~Canada~~of ~~for~~this ~~$24~~Report,~~131~~ ~~and are~~the ~~currently~~parties ~~making~~have ~~monthly~~settle ~~installments~~the ofcase for $299,~~464~~870 ~~until~~and the ~~obligation~~first isinstallment has been paid inaccording ~~full.~~to ~~The~~the ~~balance~~settlement ~~due~~agreement. atAt ~~September~~March 31, 302015, ~~2014~~the isbalance remaining of $780,~~392 which~~561 is recorded in accounts payable.

On ~~March~~February 2027, ~~2014~~2015, athe ~~claim~~Company was ~~filed~~served bywith ~~Billsoft,~~a ~~Case No. 14CV01827.~~complaint ~~The~~from ~~claim~~Northern ~~states~~Communication ~~the~~Services, ~~Company~~Inc. ~~indebted~~that towas ~~Billsoft~~filed in the ~~amount~~Circuit Court of ~~$16,776~~the ~~pursuant~~11th ~~the~~Judicial ~~terms~~Circuit ofIn ~~said~~and ~~Contract~~For Miami-Dade ~~including~~County, $1Florida,~~192 for~~ ~~attorney~~Case ~~and~~No.: ~~court~~14029771CA01 ~~fees~~Civil ~~incurred~~Division, alleging breach of contract by ~~Billsoft~~the ~~for~~Company aand ~~total~~seeking damages of no less than $1743,~~968~~110. ~~The~~As ~~Company~~of ~~has~~the ~~reached~~date aof ~~settlement~~this ~~agreement~~filing, onthe ~~April 24,~~parties ~~2014~~have tosettled ~~make~~the case for $143,~~000~~110 ~~monthly~~and ~~payments until~~ the ~~obligation~~first isinstallment has been paid inaccording ~~full.~~to ~~The~~the ~~balance~~settlement ~~due~~agreement. atAt ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, isthe balance remaining of $1240,~~969 which~~110 is recorded in accounts payable.

On ~~July~~March 3025, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~was~~received ~~served with~~ a ~~complaint~~collection ~~from~~letter ~~Active~~from ~~Media~~Canadian ~~Services,~~Credit ~~Inc.~~Corporation ~~that~~threatening ~~was~~litigation ~~filed~~for inbreach ~~the~~of ~~United~~contract ~~States~~by ~~District~~the ~~Court,~~Company ~~Southern~~and ~~District~~seeking damages of ~~New~~no ~~York,~~less ~~Case No~~than $29,687.: 14As ~~CV 5915,~~of ~~alleging~~the ~~breach~~date of ~~contract~~this byfiling, the Company ~~and~~is ~~seeking~~evaluating ~~damages~~whether ofa ~~approximately~~loss ~~$374,803~~is ~~plus~~probable ~~interest~~or ~~and~~if ~~collection~~there ~~costs~~is a reasonable possibility ~~due~~that a loss may had been incurred. ~~The~~ ~~action~~As isof ~~presently~~March in31, 2015, the ~~discovery~~amount ~~stage.~~claimed, ~~The~~$29,687, ~~Company~~has ~~intends~~been toaccrued ~~vigorously~~by ~~defend~~the ~~this~~Company ~~action~~and is recorded in accounts payable.

On ~~July~~April 303, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~was~~received ~~served with~~ a ~~complaint~~collection letter from ~~QVC,~~Receivables ~~Inc.~~Control ~~that~~Corporation ~~was~~threatening ~~filed~~litigation infor breach of contract by the ~~United~~Company ~~States~~and ~~District~~seeking ~~Court~~damages of no less than $247,500. ~~for~~As of the ~~Eastern~~filing ~~District~~date of ~~Pennsylvania~~this report, ~~Case~~the ~~No.:~~parties ~~2:14-cv-04406-LS, alleging~~have ~~breach~~settle ofthe ~~contract~~case byfor $10,000 and the ~~Company~~first ~~and~~installment ~~seeking~~has ~~damages~~been paid ofaccording noto ~~less~~the ~~than~~settlement ~~$95,798~~agreement. ~~The~~ ~~action~~As isof ~~presently~~March in31, 2015, the ~~discovery~~amount ~~stage.~~settled ~~The~~has ~~Company~~been ~~intends~~accrued toby ~~vigorously~~the ~~defend~~Company ~~this~~and ~~action~~is recorded in accounts payable.

The Complaint makes direct claims against the Company and its management for: (1) a declaratory judgment stating the amount of shares owned by current management is inaccurate; (2) an accounting; (3) breach of contract for an unspecified amount of damages; (4) fraudulent inducement for an unspecified amount of damages (5) an equitable lien; and conspiracy. ~~The Company will respond to the Complaint as required by the Court. The Company denies all such claims and intends to vigorously defend this action.~~

WeThe ~~are~~Company ~~aggressively~~moved ~~defending~~to ~~all~~dismiss ofthis ~~the lawsuits and claims described above~~action. ~~While~~By weOrder doof ~~not~~the ~~believe~~Court, dated ~~these~~April ~~aforementioned~~27, ~~claims~~2015, ~~will~~the ~~have~~Court adenied ~~material~~the ~~adverse~~motion ~~effect~~in onits ~~our~~entirety. ~~financial position~~Also, ~~given~~ ~~the~~by ~~uncertainty~~Order, ~~and~~dated ~~unpredictability~~April of27, ~~litigation~~2015, ~~there~~the ~~can~~Court beconsolidated this noaction ~~assurance~~with ofthe noaction ~~material~~below ~~adverse~~to ~~effect~~quiet title. The Company is ~~engaged~~ inrequired ~~other~~to ~~legal~~serve ~~actions~~ and ~~claims~~file ~~arising~~its inAnswer ~~the~~and ~~ordinary~~Counterclaims ~~course~~on ofor before ~~business~~May 18, ~~none~~2015. The Company denies the material allegations of ~~which~~the ~~are~~Complaint ~~believed~~and intends to bevigorously ~~material to~~defend ~~the~~this ~~Company~~action.

~~Note~~On 16or –about ~~Patent~~December ~~Protection~~24, ~~Costs~~2014, the Company filed an action against Telestrata, LLC in Florida State Court seeking to quiet title on its property and for slander of title based on Telestrata placing a mortgage on the property without the Company’s authorization. On February 4, 2015, Telestrata, LLC removed this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. As discussed above, by Order, dated April 27, 2015, the Court consolidated this action with the above action commenced by Telestrata against the Company. The Company was directed to assert its claims as counterclaims in the consolidated action.

Assets are probable future economic benefits obtained as a result of past transactions or events. Legal fees and other costs incurred for successfully defending a patent from infringement are considered deferred legal costs in the sense that they are part of the cost of retaining and obtaining the future economic benefit of the patent as per Statement of Accounting Concept No. 6. If defense of the patent lawsuit is expected to be successful, costs may be capitalized to the extent of an evident increase in the value of the patent per TIS Section 2260.

Management believes it is probable that the patent will be successfully defended which will increase the patents value as a result of defending the suit. Thus, legal fees incurred defending our patent have been recorded in other assets. As of September 30, 2014 legal fees recorded as other assets are $392,353.

We are aggressively defending all of the lawsuits and claims described above. While we do not believe these aforementioned claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, given the uncertainty and unpredictability of litigation there can be no assurance of no material adverse effect. The Company is engaged in other legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which are believed to be material to the Company.

Item 2 – Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations

Our Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Quarterly Report contains, in addition to unaudited historical information, forward-looking statements, which involve risk and uncertainties. The words “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “plan,” or “continue” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include, without limitation, those discussed under the headings “Risk Factors” in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, if any. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to (and we expressly disclaim any obligation to) revise or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, subsequent events, or otherwise (except as may be required by law), in order to reflect any event or circumstance which may arise after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Cautionary Statement about Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q and other written material and oral statements made from time to time by us do not relate to historical or current facts. As such, they are referred to as “forward-looking statements,” which are intended to convey our expectations or predictions regarding the occurrence of possible future events or the existence of trends and factors that may impact our future plans and operating results. These forward-looking statements are derived, in part, from various assumptions and analyses we have made in the context of our current business plan and information currently available to us and in light of our experience and perceptions of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate in the circumstances. You can generally identify forward-looking statements through words and phrases such as “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “budget,” “project,” “may be,” “may continue,” “may likely result,” and similar expressions. When reading any forward looking statement, you should remain mindful that actual results or developments may vary substantially from those expected as expressed in or implied by that statement for a number of reasons or factors, such as those relating to:

·● our ability to develop sales and marketing capabilities;

·● the accuracy of our estimates and projections;

·● our ability to fund our short-term and long-term financing needs;

·● changes in our business plan and corporate strategies; and other risks and uncertainties discussed in greater detail in the sections of this Form 10Q, including the section captioned “Plan of Operation”.

Each forward-looking statement should be read in context with, and with an understanding of, the various other disclosures concerning our Company and our business made elsewhere in this Form 10Q, as well as other public reports filed with the SEC. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of actual results or developments. We are not obligated to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this report to reflect new events or circumstances unless and to the extent required by applicable law.

Going Concern and Liquidity

We have never sustained profits and our losses could continue. Without sufficient additional capital to repay our indebtedness as it matures, we may be required to significantly scale back our operations, significantly reduce our headcount, seek protection under the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and/or discontinue many of our activities which could negatively affect our business and prospects. Our current efforts to raise capital may not be successful on terms favorable to the Company, or at all.

We ~~recorded~~incurred net losses of $~~682~~555,~~018~~663 and 1611,~~673,029~~051 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014,~~2015 ~~compared to net losses of $884,879~~ and ~~3,740,984 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively~~2014. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, we ~~had~~have $26,~~996~~146,~~155~~455 in ~~long~~secured ~~term~~and ~~debt~~convertible promissory notes, after deducting applicable discount, ~~$3,083,500~~ inall of which is short ~~promissory~~term ~~notes~~other than $212,300 and we have $1,400,000 in a short term mortgage payable. Also, ~~The~~as ~~Company~~of ~~raised~~March ~~approximately~~31, ~~$138~~2015,~~500 in~~ ~~convertible~~we ~~promissory~~had ~~notes~~negative inworking ~~the~~capital ~~third~~of ~~quarter and have a commitment for an additional~~ $~~400~~12,~~000~~532,396.

20Our current cash resources, together with anticipated cash flows from operating activities, may not be sufficient to fund our operations or debt that is maturing in the third and fourth quarters of 2015 or that is due on demand. In light of these circumstances, we are seeking additional capital through public or private debt or equity financing. However, there are no assurances that those efforts will be successful or that additional capital will be available on terms that do not adversely affect our existing stockholders or restrict our operations, if it is available at all.

Our current cash resources, together with anticipated cash flows from operating activities, may not be sufficient to fund our operations or debt that is maturing in November 29, 2014 or that is due on demand. In light of these circumstances, we are seeking additional capital through public or private debt or equity financing. However, there are no assurances that those efforts will be successful or that additional capital will be available on terms that do not adversely affect our existing stockholders or restrict our operations, if it is available at all.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared ~~and~~ and are presented assuming the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred significant ~~recurring~~ recurring losses from operations and is dependent on outside sources of funding for continuation of its operations. Our independent registered public accounting firm issued its report dated ~~May~~April 715, ~~2014~~2015, in connection with the audit of our financial statements as of December 31, ~~2013~~ 2014, that included an emphasis of a matter paragraph describing the existence of conditions that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

· AsEstablish aand ~~result~~build ofstrategic ~~the~~alliances ~~Redemption~~and ~~Agreement,~~partnerships wewith ~~restructured~~companies ~~the~~offering ~~Company’s~~complimentary ~~debt~~products ~~on December 31, 2013 resulting in the extinguishment of $13,662,615 of debt, $436,234 of accrued interest, $1,601,116 accrued dividends, cancelled 19,995,092 shares of common stock~~ and ~~cancelled~~services ~~common~~providing ~~stock~~synergies ~~purchase warrants exercisable~~ for ~~76,864,250~~those ~~shares of the Company’s common stock~~involved.

· WeLeverage ~~identified~~our ~~key~~extensive ~~vendors~~call ~~and~~termination ~~developed~~agreements ~~strategic~~to ~~alliances~~offer ~~whereby~~wholesale ~~the~~call ~~Company~~terminations ~~has~~to ~~reduced~~other itcarriers ~~cost~~– ofpowered ~~providing~~by ~~telecom~~its ~~service~~carrier grade and ~~extended~~proprietary ~~the~~VoIP ~~due~~switching ~~dates of certain promissory notes to March 1, 2016~~platform.

Company and Business

WeNET ~~are~~TALK.COM, aINC. ~~telephone~~(“netTALK” ~~company~~or ~~who~~the ~~provides~~“Company”) was ~~sells~~incorporated ~~and~~on ~~supplies~~May ~~commercial and~~1, ~~residential~~2006 ~~telecommunication~~under ~~services~~the laws of the State of Florida, ~~including~~under ~~services~~the ~~utilizing~~name ~~voice~~Discover ~~over~~Screens ~~internet~~Inc. ~~protocol~~On ~~(“VoIP”)~~September ~~technology~~10, 2008 ~~session~~the ~~initiation~~Company ~~protocol~~changed ~~(“SIP”)~~its ~~technology,~~name ~~wireless~~to ~~fidelity~~NETTALK.COM ~~technology,~~INC. ~~wireless~~The ~~maximum~~company ~~technology,~~is ~~marine~~a ~~satellite services~~leading ~~technology,~~ultra-low ~~and~~cost ~~other~~provider ~~similar~~of ~~type~~home ~~technologies.~~phone ~~Our~~and ~~main~~smartphone communications. ~~offerings~~netTALK’s ~~are~~global ~~(1)~~communications ~~analog~~network ~~telephone~~supports ~~adapters~~its ~~(“Device~~flagship ~~or Devices”)~~products ~~that~~which ~~provide~~are ~~connectivity~~the ~~for~~DUO ~~analog~~home ~~telephones~~phone service and ~~faxes~~CONNECT tomobile ~~home,~~apps. The DUO home ~~office~~phone orservice ~~corporate~~provides local ~~area~~and ~~networks (“LAN”).~~long ~~Our~~distance ~~Devices~~calling throughout the United States and Canada and the ~~telecommunication~~complementary ~~services~~CONNECT ~~are~~mobile apps provide a ~~cost~~unified ~~effective~~communications ~~solution~~experience ~~for~~whether ~~individuals,~~at ~~small~~home ~~businesses and~~or ~~telecommuters~~on-the-go. ~~connecting~~The tocompany provides ~~any~~this ~~analog~~high ~~telephone~~tech, ~~fax~~easy orto ~~private~~use ~~branch~~and ~~exchange~~ultra-low ~~(“PBX”).~~cost ~~Our~~service ~~Devices~~with ~~provide~~just one ~~USB~~ ~~port,~~bill ~~one~~once ~~Ethernet~~a ~~port~~year. ~~and~~Additionally, ~~one~~the ~~analog~~company ~~telephone~~leverages its ~~port.~~extensive Acall ~~full~~termination ~~suite~~agreements ofto ~~internet~~offer ~~protocol~~wholesale ~~features~~call isterminations ~~available~~ to ~~maximize universal~~other ~~connectivity.~~carriers In– ~~addition,~~powered ~~analog~~by ~~telephones~~its ~~attached~~carrier grade toand ~~our~~proprietary ~~Device~~VoIP ~~are~~switching ~~able~~platform. toThe ~~use~~company ~~advanced~~believes ~~calling~~everyone ~~features~~should ~~such~~have ~~as call~~access ~~forwarding,~~to ~~caller~~easy IDto use, ~~3-way~~affordable ~~calling,~~home and ~~call~~on-the-go ~~holding,~~digital ~~call~~phone ~~retrieval,~~service ~~and~~around ~~call~~the ~~transfer~~world.

History and Overview

We are a Florida corporation, incorporated on May 1, 2006, under the name Discover Screens, Inc. (“Discover Screens”).

Prior to September 10, 2008, we were known as Discover Screens, a company dedicated to providing advertising through interactive, audiovisual, information and advertising portals located in high-traffic indoor venues. Our name and business operations changed in a series of transactions beginning in December of 2007.

On September 10, 2008, we changed our name from Discover Screens, Inc. to NetTalk.com, Inc. and we acquired certain tangible and intangible assets, formerly owned by Interlink Global Corporation (“Interlink”), directly from Interlink’s creditor who had seized the assets pursuant to a Security and Collateral Agreement.

Operation

We provide, sell and supply commercial and residential telecommunication services, including services utilizing voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) technology, session initiation protocol (“SIP”) technology, wireless fidelity technology, wireless maximum technology, marine satellite services technology and other similar type technologies. We are developing our business infrastructure and new products and services.

General and Recent Developments

On October 10, 2014, the Company received a termination letter from its primary vendor, Iristel (owned by, and with its CEO being, the previous President of ~~NetTALK~~netTALK), which provides telecommunications service and phone numbers (“DID”), with respect to two contracts between Iristel and the Company, one dealing with carriage and one dealing with DIDs. Upon being informed of the termination, the Company ported its carriage to a new carrier, and informed Iristel that, pursuant to its rights under the DID contract, it would port the DIDs promptly to a new provider. On October 17, 2014, Samer Bishay, ~~current~~previous President of the Company and CEO of Iristel, purporting to act on behalf of both the Company and ~~Irisitel~~ Iristel, without conflict waivers of any sort, attempted to agree to rescind the termination of the DID contract, which neither Iristel nor the Company had the power to do. The Company ~~continues~~attempted to ~~attempt to~~ shift the DIDs to new carriers, but Iristel, through Samer Bishay, the previous President of the Company, ~~refuses~~refused to allow these customers to be moved to new DID vendors.

On October 15, 2014, Telestrata LLC (“Telestrata”), a Colorado limited liability company, owned or controlled by three members of the NetTalk board of directors that were removed from the Board November 26, 2014, exercised itits warrant for 19,424,000 shares of netTALK common stock. On October 16, 2014, (1) members of management exercised their warrants for 24,280,000 shares of netTALK common stock and (2) shareholders representing more than a majority of the then outstanding common stock of the Company voted, via written consent in lieu of a meeting, to remove each of Samer Bishay (President), Maged Bishara, and Nardir Aljasrawi from their positions as members of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Director Removal"). The Director Removal became effective November 26, 2014.

~~The~~On ~~Removal~~October ~~will~~27, ~~become~~2014, ~~effective~~Company was notified that Samer Bishay, current President of the Company, on or about October 24th, 2014, through counsel for Telestrata, an entity with which he is affiliated, unilaterally filed a mortgage in the amount of approximately ~~(but~~$4.5 ~~not~~million, ~~less~~encumbering certain real property of the Company. The ~~than~~Company's Board of Directors (the "Board"), 20through ~~days~~a ~~after~~unanimous written consent executed September 2, 2014, by all directors including Mr. Bishay, authorized the ~~filing~~company to undertake such action only under certain conditions, including the condition that only the Chief Financial Officer of ~~definitive~~the ~~information~~Company ~~statement~~could execute and ~~its~~authorize ~~mailing~~any tosuch filing. Such written consent has not been revoked, modified or superseded by any subsequent valid action of the Board, and accordingly, the Company's ~~stockholders~~is working with counsel to rescind such unauthorized encumbrance and pursue any causes of action it or its shareholders may have against Mr. Bishay.

On October 27, 2014, Company was notified that Samer Bishay, current President of the Company, on or about October 24th, 2014, through counsel for Telestrata, LLC, an entity with which he is affiliated, unilaterally filed a mortgage in the amount of approximately $4.5 million, encumbering certain real property of the Company. The Company's Board of Directors (the "Board"), through a unanimous written consent executed September 2, 2014, by all directors including Mr. Bishay, authorized the company to undertake such action only under certain conditions, including the condition that only the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, could execute and authorize any such filing. Such written consent has not been revoked, modified or superseded by any subsequent valid action of the Board, and accordingly, the Company is working with counsel to rescind such unauthorized encumbrance and pursue any causes of action it or it shareholders may have against Mr. Bishay.

As a result of this unauthorized encumbrance, at this time the Company is unable to refinance the mortgage payable that matures November 29, 2014. Even though we cannot refinance the mortgage payable as discussed in footnote 14, the Company is working with the lender to extend the maturity date of the mortgage payable.

~~The~~As ~~Company executed~~ a ~~redemption~~result ~~and~~of ~~debt~~this ~~restructuring~~unauthorized ~~agreement with~~encumbrance, ~~Vicis~~at ~~Capital~~this ~~Master~~time ~~Fund~~the Company ~~("Vicis")~~is unable to, ~~among~~refinance ~~other things, extend~~ the ~~term~~mortgage ofpayable ~~our~~that ~~loans~~was ~~with~~to ~~two~~mature ~~additional~~November ~~one year extensions~~29, ~~and~~2014. ~~reduce~~However, the ~~overall~~maturity ~~loan~~date ~~with~~was ~~Vicis from approximately seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000)~~ extended to ~~three~~November ~~million dollars ($3~~29,~~000,000).~~ ~~The restated loan accrues interest at six percent (6%) per annum~~2015.

InEffective ~~addition~~March 11, ~~pursuant~~2014, tonetTALK ~~the redemptions~~ and ~~restructuring~~Telestrata ~~agreement,~~executed a ~~all~~restricted ~~shares~~stock and ~~derivative~~warrant ~~securities~~purchase ~~held~~agreement, bypursuant ~~Vicis~~to ~~were~~which, ~~cancelled~~in ~~including~~part, ~~the~~Telestrata ~~series~~purchased: A(a) ~~convertible redeemable preferred stock~~25, 19441,~~995,092~~170 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (b) a common stock purchase ~~warrants~~warrant ~~exercisable~~entitling ~~for~~Telestrata ~~76,864,250~~to purchase shares of common stock of the Company equal to 20% of the then outstanding shares of common stock of netTALK. ~~These~~Subject ~~securities~~to ~~have~~repayment ~~been~~obligations ~~returned~~of the Company as provided below, Telestrata received credit of $4,571,940 to acquire the ~~Company~~shares and ~~have~~warrants ~~been~~as ~~cancelled.~~follows: ~~The~~(a) ~~holders~~$500,000 ~~received~~in nothe form ~~additional~~of ~~consideration~~the conversion and cancellation of two promissory notes issued to Samer Bishay in May and July 2013, (b) $837,374 in loans to ~~effect~~the Company received in the ~~modification~~third and fourth quarters of 2013 and (c) the satisfaction by Telestrata of $2,734,566 of liabilities of the Company.

~~Effective~~Also, on March 11, 2014, ~~netTALK~~the ~~and~~Company ~~Telestrata~~executed ~~LLC~~a ~~(“Telestrata”),~~secured promissory anote ~~Colorado~~with ~~limited~~Telestrata ~~liability~~for ~~company~~$4,071,940. ~~executed~~Interest aaccrues ~~restricted~~at ~~stock~~5% and ~~warrant~~the ~~purchase~~note ~~agreement~~and interest are payable March 1, ~~pursuant~~2016 subject to ~~which,~~accelerated repayment terms as defined in ~~part~~the secured promissory note agreement. The principal balance of this note increased $500,000 ~~Telestrata~~from ~~purchased:~~additional ~~(a) 25~~advances,~~441,170~~ ~~shares~~as ofdefined in the ~~Company’s~~promissory ~~common~~note ~~stock~~agreement, ~~and~~resulting ~~(b)~~in a ~~common~~new ~~stock~~principal ~~purchase~~balance ~~warrant~~of ~~entitling~~$4,571,940. ~~Telestrata~~Advanced topayments ~~purchase~~are ~~shares~~required ofbased ~~common~~certain ~~stock~~conditions ofwith qualified financing as defined in the ~~Company~~secured ~~equal~~promissory note agreement. The promissory note provides for a discount of up to ~~20%~~a maximum of $1,805,785 if the ~~then~~Company ~~outstanding~~makes ~~shares~~timely ofprincipal ~~common~~and ~~stock~~interest ofpayments as ~~netTALK~~required by the promissory note.

~~Subject~~Effective toDecember ~~repayment~~31, ~~obligations~~2013, of the Company asexecuted ~~provided~~a redemption ~~below,~~and ~~Telestrata~~debt ~~received~~restructuring ~~credit~~agreement ofwith ~~$4,571,939~~Vicis toCapital ~~acquire~~Master ~~shares~~Fund ~~and warrants as follows:~~ (a"Vicis") ~~$500~~to,~~000~~ inamong ~~the~~other ~~form~~things, ofextend the ~~conversion~~term of ~~and~~its ~~cancellation~~loans ofwith two ~~promissory~~additional ~~notes~~one ~~issued~~year toextensions, ~~Samer Bishay in May~~ and ~~July~~reduce ~~2013,~~the ~~(b)~~overall ~~$837,373~~loan inwith ~~loans~~Vicis tofrom ~~the~~approximately ~~Company~~seventeen ~~received~~million indollars ~~the~~($17,000,000) ~~third~~to ~~and~~three ~~fourth~~million ~~quarters~~dollars ~~of 2013 and~~ (c$3,000,000). ~~the~~The ~~satisfaction~~restated byloan ~~Telestrata~~accrues ofinterest ~~$2,734,566~~at ofsix ~~liabilities~~percent of(6%) ~~the~~per ~~Company~~annum.

OnIn ~~March 11~~addition, ~~2014,~~pursuant to the ~~Company~~redemption ~~executed~~and arestructuring ~~secured promissory~~agreement, ~~note~~all ~~with~~shares ~~Telestrata~~and ~~LLC~~derivative ~~(“Telestrata”),~~securities aheld ~~Colorado~~by ~~limited~~Vicis ~~liability~~were ~~for~~cancelled ~~$4,071,940.~~including ~~Interest accrues at 5% and~~ the ~~note~~ ~~and~~series ~~interest~~A ~~are~~convertible ~~payable~~redeemable ~~March~~preferred 1stock, ~~2016 subject to accelerated repayment terms as defined in the promissory note agreement.~~ ~~The principal balance of the note can increase based on additional advances~~19,995,092 asshares ~~defined in the promissory note agreement. As~~ of ~~March~~ ~~31, 2014,~~ the Company’s ~~received~~common ~~$200~~stock,~~000~~ ~~of additional cash payments~~ and ~~approximately~~common ~~$57,396~~stock ofpurchase ~~additional~~warrants ~~indirect~~exercisable ~~cash payments~~ for ~~telecom~~76,864,250 ~~service~~shares ~~received from an affiliate~~ of common ~~Telestrata~~stock. ~~This~~These ~~affiliate~~securities ishave ~~owned~~been byreturned ~~the~~to ~~President of~~ the Company~~. These~~ ~~amounts~~and ~~were~~have ~~added~~been ~~to the original principal balance resulting in a new principal balance of $4,329,336 less the discount of up to $1,805,785~~cancelled. ~~Advanced payments are required based certain conditions with qualified financing as defined in the Secured Promissory Note.~~ The ~~promissory~~holders ~~note~~received ~~provides~~no ~~for~~additional ~~a discount of up~~ consideration to aeffect ~~maximum of $1,805,785 if~~ the ~~Company makes timely principal and interest payments as required by the promissory note~~modification.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting policies are discussed and summarized in Note 3 to our financial statements. The following describes our critical accounting policies.

Use of Estimates

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized for device sales when the customer is invoiced for retail sales and when the customer completes the transaction for internet sales. Revenue for telecom service is recognized prorata monthly as the service is used and revenue for shipping costs billed to customers are included as a component of product sales. The associated cost of shipping is included as a component of cost of product sales.

Deferred Revenue

International calls are billed as earned from our customers. International calls are prepaid and customers account is debited as minutes are used and earned.

Results of Operations

Three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2013~~ 2014

Revenues: Net revenues were $1,~~209~~178,~~473~~466 and $1,~~491~~175,~~404~~879 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to a decrease in ~~devices~~ devices sold, deep ~~discounts~~discount and free device offers to customers ~~and~~which ais ~~decrease~~partially inoffset ~~telecom~~by ~~renewals,~~an ~~which~~increase isin ~~partially~~telecom ~~offset by~~renewals and a higher portion of the initial sales price going to device sales due to, among other things, product offerings providing less telecom service.

Cost of revenues: Cost of revenues were $491,973 and $753,455 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in cost of revenues is primarily due to a reduction in the number of devices sold and a reduction in the telecom cost per subscriber offset by higher cost of device sales due to deep discounts and free device offers to customers.

~~Cost~~Gross ~~of revenues~~margin: ~~Cost~~Gross ofprofits ~~revenues~~ were $~~826~~686,~~226~~493 and $1422,~~107,261~~ 424 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase ~~in cost of revenues~~ is ~~primarily~~ due primarily to a reduction in the ~~number~~cost of ~~devices sold and a reduction in the~~ telecom service ~~cost~~charge per subscriber ~~offset~~plus byselling ~~higher~~fewer ~~cost~~low ofmargin devices ~~due to deep discounts and free device offers to customers~~.

~~Gross~~Operating ~~margin~~expenses: ~~Gross~~Operating ~~profits~~expenses were $~~383~~1,~~247~~062,384 compared ~~and~~to $~~384~~922,~~143~~ 265 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The increase in operating expenses is due primarily to athe ~~reduction~~increase in ~~the~~professional ~~cost of~~fees ~~telecom~~including ~~service~~legal ~~charges~~fees ~~per~~to ~~subscriber~~defend asour ~~described~~legal ~~above~~matters ~~plus~~and ~~selling~~consulting ~~fewer~~fees ~~devices~~offset atby a decrease ~~lower~~in ~~gross~~advertising ~~profit~~and ~~percentage~~compensation expense.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses were $901,496 compared to $1,129,744 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to management’s cost cutting plan initiated in 2013. Also, the Company began capitalizing development costs in the first quarter of 2014 reducing research & development and compensation & benefits as described below. And the Company began recording legal fees to defend its patent as an asset in the first quarter of 2014. See footnote 16 for further discussion.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014		$ Change			% Change
Advertising	$	873	$	64,047	$	(63,174	)		-99	%
Compensation & Benefits		273,437		367,374		(93,937	)		-26	%
Professional fees		291,816		92,399		199,417			216	%
Depreciation & Amortization		53,256		58,317		(5,061	)		-9	%
Research & Development		135,711		96,281		39,430			41	%
General & Administrative		307,291		243,847		63,444			26	%
Total operating expenses	$	1,062,384	$	922,265	$	140,119

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
Advertising		16,451		54,888		(38,437	)		-70	%
Compensation & Benefits		231,802		336,088		(104,286	)		-31	%
Professional fees		96,282		87,126		9,156			11	%
Depreciation & Amortization		72,943		70,843		2,100			3	%
Research & Development		133,142		252,641		(119,499	)		-47	%
General & Administrative		350,877		328,158		22,719			7	%
Total operating expenses		901,496		1,129,744		(228,248	)

General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses were $307,291 and $243,847 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due an overall increase in expenses as compared to the 3 months ended March 31, 2014 at which point the company was in a company-wide cost cutting plan to conserve liquidity.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014		$ Change		% Change
Insurance	$	50,555	$	40,314	$	10,241		25	%
Taxes and licenses		53,066		44,767		8,299		19	%
Travel		17,574		14,497		3,077		21	%
Commissions		61,714		52,133		9,581		18	%
Other		124,382		92,136		32,246		35	%
Total G&A expenses	$	307,291	$	243,847	$	63,444

WeLoss ~~capitalize~~from ~~costs~~Operations: ~~for~~Losses ~~internally~~from ~~developed~~operations ~~software~~were ~~in accordance~~$375,891 ~~with~~and ~~FASB~~$499,481 ~~ASC~~for ~~350-40. Cost incurred in~~ the ~~preliminary~~three ~~project~~months ~~stage~~ended ~~are~~March ~~expenses~~31, as2015 ~~incurred. Preliminary project stage includes conceptual formulation~~ and ~~evaluation of alternatives~~2014, ~~determination~~respectively. ofThe ~~existence~~decrease ofin ~~needed~~losses ~~technology~~was ~~and~~due ~~final~~primarily ~~selection~~to ~~of alternatives.~~increased ~~Costs~~gross ~~incurred~~profit inmargin from the ~~application~~reduction ~~development~~in ~~stage~~telecom ~~are~~service ~~capitalized~~charges aspartially ~~incurred~~offset ~~and~~by ~~includes~~the ~~design~~increase ofin ~~chosen~~operating ~~path, configuration, coding, installation of hardware, and testing~~expenses. ~~Capitalization stops after software implementation.~~

WeInterest ~~capitalized~~Expense: ~~development~~Interest ~~costs~~expense ofwas $~~103~~179,~~202~~772 and $0 111,210 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. ~~Capitalized~~The ~~cost~~increase ~~will~~in beinterest ~~amortized~~expense ~~over~~was ~~the~~primarily ~~software’s~~due ~~expected useful life. These products are not available for general release~~ to ~~customers or for internal use by~~ the ~~Company~~increase in debt and ~~thus,~~increase ~~are not~~in ~~being~~certain ~~amortized~~interest rates.

~~General~~Net ~~and Administrative Expenses~~Loss: ~~General~~Net ~~and~~loss ~~administrative expenses~~was ~~were~~ $~~350~~555,~~877~~663 and $~~328~~611,~~158~~051 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in taxes and licenses and travel expense in order to raise capital and pursue new business offset by management’s cost cutting plan initiated in 2013.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
Insurance		46,929		44,558		2,371			5	%
Taxes and licenses		107,292		60,280		47,012			78	%
Travel		31,088		4,255		26,833			631	%
Commissions		61,967		66,331		(4,364	)		-7	%
Other		103,602		152,734		(49,132	)		-32	%
Total G&A expenses		350,877		328,158		22,719

Net loss Per Common Share: Net loss per common share was $$0.005 and $$0.012 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Loss from Operations: Losses from operations were $518,249 and $745,601 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in losses was due primarily to increased gross profit margin from the reduction in telecom service charges and the reduction of operating expenses.

Interest Expense: Interest expense was $163,770 and $365,423 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the reduction in debt related to the restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Net Loss: Net loss was $682,018 and $884,879 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Net loss Per Common Share: Net loss per common share was $0.01 and $0.01 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Nine months ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Revenues: Net revenues were $3,661,964 and $4,413,763 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in revenues is primarily due to a decrease in devices sold, deep discounts and free device offers to customers and a slight decrease in telecom renewals, which is partially offset by a higher portion of the initial sales price going to device sales due to, among other things, product offerings providing less telecom service.

Cost of revenues: Cost of revenues were $2,350,857 and $3,687,895 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in cost of revenues is primarily due to a reduction in the number of devices sold and a reduction in the telecom cost per subscriber offset by higher cost of devices due to deep discounts and free device offers to customers.

Gross margin: Gross profits were $1,311,107 and $725,868 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase is due primarily to a reduction in the cost of telecom service charges per subscriber as described above plus selling fewer devices at a lower gross profit percentage.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses were $2,588,454 compared to $3,778,597 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to management’s cost cutting plan initiated in 2013. Also, the Company began capitalizing development costs in the first quarter of 2014 reducing research & development and compensation & benefits as described below. And the Company began recording legal fees to defend our patent as an asset in the first quarter of 2014. See footnote 16 for further discussion.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
Advertising		124,437		207,200		(82,763	)		-40	%
Compensation & Benefits		840,643		1,021,756		(181,113	)		-18	%
Professional fees		234,243		298,550		(64,307	)		-22	%
Depreciation & Amortization		212,695		225,825		(13,130	)		-6	%
Research & Development		319,145		763,711		(444,566	)		-58	%
General & Administrative		857,291		1,261,555		(404,264	)		-32	%
Total operating expenses		2,588,454		3,778,597		(1,190,143	)

We capitalize costs for internally developed software in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40. Costs incurred in the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. Preliminary project stage includes conceptual formulation and evaluation of alternatives, determination of existence of needed technology and final selection of alternatives. Costs incurred in the application development stage are capitalized as incurred and includes design of chosen path, configuration, coding, installation of hardware, and testing. Capitalization stops after software implementation.

General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses were $857,291 and $1,261,555 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to management’s cost cutting plan initiated in 2013 offset, in part, by an increase in travel expense in order to raise capital and pursue new business.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
Insurance		128,993		171,951		(42,958	)		-25	%
Taxes and licenses		196,544		171,968		24,576			14	%
Travel		68,278		25,525		42,753			167	%
Commissions		161,466		281,961		(120,495	)		-43	%
Other		302,010		610,150		(308,140	)		-51	%
Total G&A expenses		857,291		1,261,555		(404,264	)

Loss from Operations: Losses from operations were $1,277,347 and $3,052,729 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in loss from operations was due primarily to increased gross profit margin from the reduction in telecom service charges and the reduction of operating expenses offset by a reduction in the device gross profit margin.

Interest Expense: Interest expense was $395,682 and $1,090,377 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the reduction in debt related to the restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Net Loss: Net loss was $1,673,029 and $3,740,984 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Net loss Per Common Share: Net loss per common share was $0.02 and $0.06 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal source of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalent balances, cash flow from operations, and access to financial markets. Our current cash resources, together with anticipated cash flows from operating activities, may not be sufficient to fund our operations, or pay the mortgage payable that matures November 29, 2015 ~~2014.~~or ~~The~~pay ~~Company~~our isconvertible ~~working~~promissory ~~with~~notes ~~the~~that ~~lender~~mature toin ~~extend~~ the ~~note~~third toand ~~November~~fourth ~~29,~~quarter ~~2016~~of 2015. Although, the terms may not be ~~acceptable~~ acceptable to the Company if available at all.

As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, our cash and cash equivalents were $~~147~~227,~~557~~167 compared to $76372,~~791~~284 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 we had negative working capital of $812,~~584~~532,~~928~~396 compared to $49,~~899~~233,~~828~~886 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~reduction~~increase is due primarily to the current ~~liability~~ ~~classification~~status of ~~$3.0~~virtually ~~million~~all debt ~~and~~other ~~$83,500~~than promissory notes ~~due~~of ~~in the next twelve months~~$212,300.

Net cash ~~used~~provided inby operating activities ~~for~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 was $1110,~~222,883~~708 compared to net cash used in operations of $1,~~633~~097,~~826~~403 for the same ~~period~~ period of ~~2013~~2014. The ~~increase~~improvement in cash ~~used~~from in operating activities was due primarily to ~~the~~cash provided by an increase in accounts payable in 2015 compared to reduction in ~~net~~accounts ~~loss~~payable ~~for~~from converting accounts payable into a portion of the ~~period~~Telestrata promissory note.

Net cash used in investing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 was $~~357~~99,~~456~~575 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $3680,~~760~~911 for the same period of ~~2013~~2014. The increase in cash used in investing activities was due primarily to ~~the~~restricted ~~increase~~cash inproviding ~~investment~~liquidity in ~~development~~2014 of ~~costs~~$68,400 compared to zero in 2015.

Net cash ~~provided~~used byin financing activities ~~for~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 was $1156,~~651,105~~250 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $1,~~695~~390,~~087~~ 834 for the same period of ~~2013~~2014. The ~~decrease~~reduction in cash provided by investing activities was due primarily to cash proceeds of $~~400~~1,~~000~~ 169,273 in ~~2013~~2014 compared ~~from~~to ~~the~~no ~~mortgage~~new ~~payable~~funding ~~which was fully funded~~ in ~~2013~~2015.

Certain Risks and Concentration

Our primary manufacturer accounted for approximately 2420% ~~and 21%~~ of our cost of ~~revenues~~goods sold for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. ~~Our~~And our primary telecom service provider, ~~which is owned by the current president of the Company,~~ accounted for approximately 3525% ofand ~~our~~36% of cost of ~~revenues~~goods sold for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~ ~~30,~~March ~~2014. Our primary telecom service provider~~31, ~~which~~2015 ~~was~~and ~~not owned by the current president~~2014, ~~accounted for approximately~~ ~~25% of our cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013~~respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015.

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable. We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 4 Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

As of September 30, 2014, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified for each report and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.26

InAs ~~connection~~of March 31, 2015, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the ~~assessment~~participation ~~described~~of ~~above~~our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, ~~management~~of the effectiveness of the ~~identified~~design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the ~~following~~time ~~control~~periods ~~deficiencies~~specified for each report and that ~~represent~~such ~~material~~information ~~weaknesses~~is ataccumulated ~~September~~and 30communicated ~~2014:~~to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses at March 31, 2015:

Due to the limited resources, we have insufficient personnel resources and technical accounting and reporting expertise to properly address all of the accounting matters inherent in our financial transactions. We do not have a formal audit committee and the Board of Directors does not have a financial expert, thus we lack the Board oversight role within the financial reporting process.

Our small accounting department prohibits the segregation of duties necessary to ensure certain controls are effective.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to insure that information required to be disclosed will be recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to ~~develop~~developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations inof financial resources. While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.

Changes in Internal Controls.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, there were no no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (f) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Legal Proceedings

On April 4, 2012, MagicJack Vocaltec Ltd. filed a complaint in United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Civil Action No.: 9:12-cv-80360-DMM, against the Company, alleging patent infringement, seeking injunctive relief and damages as a result of the alleged patent infringement. The Company answered the complaint, denying all of its material allegations, asserting a number of affirmative defenses, and seeking counterclaims for declaratory relief. The Company’s patent counsel has provided an opinion that the NetTalk DUO does not infringe their patent. MagicJack Vocaltec Ltd. and NetTalk filed a Joint Stipulation and motion for the dismissal. Effective November 2012, the federal court has dismissed the entire case with prejudice, including all claims, counterclaims, defenses and causes of action.

On September 21, 2012, NetTalk.com, Inc. filed a complaint in United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Civil Action No.: 9:12-cv-~~81022~~810220-CIV-MIDDLEBROOK/BRANNON, ~~against~~ against MAGICJACK VOCALTECLTD, MAGIJACK HOLDINGS CORPORATION f/k/a YMAX HOLDINGS CORPORATION and DANIEL BORISLOW. In the complaint we allege patent infringement by the defendants and are seeking injunctive relief and two hundred million dollars ($200,000,000) in damages as a result of the alleged patent infringement by defendants. There can be no assurances as to the outcome of this litigation.

In December 2013, netTALK received a USPTO Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (“NIRC”) for netTALK’s U.S. Patent Number 8,243,722.

~~In January 2014, netTALK petitioned the courts to restart the aforementioned lawsuit against MAGICJACK VOCALTECLTD, MAGIJACK HOLDINGS CORPORATION f/k/a YMAX HOLDINGS CORPORATION and DANIEL BORISLOW.~~27

OnIn ~~February~~January ~~27,~~ 2014, netTALK ~~received~~petitioned the ~~reexamination~~courts ~~certificate which~~to ~~restated~~restart ~~that all three claims of~~ the aforementioned ~~‘722~~lawsuit ~~Patent~~against ~~are~~MAGICJACK ~~deemed~~VOCALTECLTD, ~~allowable~~MAGIJACK byHOLDINGS ~~the~~CORPORATION ~~USPTO. The~~f/k/a ~~three~~YMAX ~~claims~~HOLDINGS ofCORPORATION ~~the ‘722~~and ~~Patent were minimally amended during the proceeding~~DANIEL BORISLOW.

On ~~September~~February 1427, ~~2012~~2014, anetTALK ~~supplier~~received to the ~~Company,~~reexamination ~~Arrow Electronics,~~certificate ~~Inc.~~which ~~(“Arrow”),~~restated ~~filed~~that aall ~~complaint~~three inclaims ~~the~~of ~~United States District Court for~~ the ~~Southern~~‘722 ~~District~~Patent ofare ~~Florida,~~deemed ~~Case No.:~~allowable ~~1:12-cv-23366-FAM, alleging breach of contract~~ by the ~~Company~~USPTO. ~~and~~The ~~seeking~~three ~~damages~~claims of ~~not less than $473,319 due to such alleged breach. The Company and Arrow Electronics, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement providing for~~ the ~~payment of~~‘722 ~~past~~Patent ~~due~~were ~~amounts.~~minimally Aamended ~~final~~during ~~order was entered into on December 12, 2012 dismissing~~ the ~~litigation~~proceeding. ~~As of September 30, 2014, the Company owes Arrow approximately $43,790 which is recorded in accounts payable.~~

29On February 27, 2015, by stipulation of the parties, the district court dismissed all claims and counterclaims in netTALK v. magicJack (Case No. 9:12-cv- 810220, Dkt. #158.) On February 27, 2015, by stipulation of the parties, the district court dismissed all claims and counterclaims in netTALK v. magicJack (Case No. 9:12-cv- 810220, Dkt. #158.) On April 24, 2015, magicJack filed a motion asking the district court to order netTALK to pay magicJack’s attorney fees of approximately $2,000,000. Under the Patent Statute, attorney fees may only be awarded in “exceptional” cases, which the Supreme Court has defined as being “uncommon,” “rare,” “not ordinary,” “out of the ordinary course,” “unusual,” “special,” or “not run-of-the-mill.”

On ~~November~~September 2614, 2012, a supplier to the ~~Client~~Company, ~~Broadvox,~~Arrow ~~LLC~~Electronics, Inc. (“~~Broadvox~~Arrow”), filed a complaint in the United States District Court offor ~~Common~~the ~~Pleas,~~Southern ~~Cuyahoga~~District ~~County,~~of ~~Ohio~~Florida, Case No.: ~~CV-~~1:12-~~796095~~cv-23366-FAM, alleging breach of contract by the Company and seeking damages of not less than $~~111~~473,~~701~~319 due to such alleged breach. The Company and ~~Broadvox~~Arrow Electronics, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement providing for the payment of ~~all~~ past due amounts. ~~The~~A ~~settlement~~final order was entered into on December 12, 2012 dismissing the litigation. As of March 31, 2015, the Company ~~paid~~owes Arrow approximately $43,790 which is recorded in ~~full~~accounts ~~October~~payable. ~~29,~~The ~~2013~~Company will continue making installment payments until the obligation is paid in full.

On ~~June~~March 3020, ~~2012,~~2014 a ~~Statement~~claim ~~of Claim~~ was ~~served~~filed by ~~DACS~~Billsoft, ~~Marketing &~~Case ~~Sponsorship Inc~~No. ~~(“DACS”) on NetTalk~~14CV01827.~~com Inc.~~ The claim ~~was~~states ~~for~~the ~~$125,834~~Company ~~for amounts DACS claims~~ is ~~owing~~indebted to it ~~pursuant~~Billsoft toin ~~its~~the ~~agreement~~amount asof ~~well as~~ $~~126~~16,~~000~~776 ~~for~~pursuant ~~general~~the ~~damages~~terms ~~for breach~~ of ~~contract.~~said AContract ~~Statement~~including ~~of Defense was delivered~~$1,192 onfor ~~behalf~~attorney ofand ~~the~~court ~~Company~~fees onincurred ~~August~~by ~~31,~~Billsoft ~~2012,~~for ~~denying~~a ~~all~~total ~~claims~~of $17,968. OnThe ~~November~~Company ~~28,~~has ~~2013,~~reached ~~the~~a ~~Company~~settlement ~~and~~agreement ~~DACS~~on ~~entered~~April 24, ~~into~~2014, ato ~~settlement agreement~~make ~~providing~~monthly ~~for~~payments of $601,000 inuntil 4the ~~monthly~~debt ~~equal~~is ~~installments~~satisfied. The ~~obligation~~balance ~~was~~due ~~paid~~at inMarch ~~full~~31, on2015 ~~February~~is $7,969 ~~2014~~which is recorded in accounts payable.

On orJuly ~~about September 1~~30, ~~2013~~2014, ~~ADP~~Active ~~Total~~Media ~~Source~~Services, ~~filed~~Inc. ~~a lawsuit~~commenced an action against the Company. ~~The~~in ~~claim~~the isUnited States District Court for anthe ~~amount~~Southern ~~not~~District ~~exceeding~~of ~~$90~~New York,~~776~~ ~~for~~Case ~~general~~No. 14-CV-5916. The Complaint filed by the plaintiff seeks $374,803 in damages ~~for~~based ~~alleged~~on the theory of breach of contract. ~~The~~On September 9, 2014 the Company ~~settled~~answered the ~~with~~complaint. ~~ADP~~The onparties ~~December~~engaged ~~23,~~in ~~2013~~discovery and ~~was~~the ~~making~~discovery ~~monthly~~phase ~~payments~~of the action ended on April 24, 2015. The Court set a deadline of $May 15,~~000~~ 2015 for the submission of motions for summary judgment, and the ~~obligation~~ ~~was~~trial ~~paid~~of inthis ~~full~~action ~~May~~is 23scheduled to commence on July 27, ~~2014~~2015.

On ~~February~~July 2430, ~~2013~~2014, athe ~~Statement~~Company ~~of Claim~~ was served bywith ~~Sears~~a complaint from ~~Canada~~QVC, Inc. onthat ~~the~~was ~~Company.~~filed ~~The~~in ~~claim~~the isUnited ~~for~~States ~~$24~~District Court,~~131~~ for ~~amounts~~the ~~Sears~~Eastern ~~claims~~District isof ~~owed~~Pennsylvania, toCase itNo.: ~~pursuant~~2:14-cv-04406-LS, alleging tobreach ~~its~~of ~~agreement~~contract ~~under~~by the ~~“Universal~~ ~~Terms~~Company and ~~Conditions~~seeking ~~for~~damages ~~Sears~~of ~~Canada~~no ~~Suppliers”~~less than $95,798. WeAs ~~have~~of ~~settled~~the ~~with~~filing ~~Sears~~date ~~Canada~~of ~~for~~this ~~$24~~Report,~~131~~ ~~and are~~the ~~currently~~parties ~~making~~have ~~monthly~~settle ~~installments~~the ofcase for $299,~~464~~870 ~~until~~and the ~~obligation~~first isinstallment ~~satisfied.~~has ~~The~~been ~~balance~~paid ~~due~~according atto ~~September~~the 30settlement agreement. At March 31, ~~2014~~2015, isthe balance remaining of $780,~~392 which~~561 is recorded in accounts payable.

On ~~March~~February 2027, ~~2014~~2015, athe ~~claim~~Company was ~~filed~~served bywith ~~Billsoft,~~a ~~Case No. 14CV01827.~~complaint ~~The~~from ~~claim~~Northern ~~states~~Communication ~~the~~Services, ~~Company~~Inc. ~~indebted~~that towas ~~Billsoft~~filed in the ~~amount~~Circuit Court of ~~$16,776~~the ~~pursuant~~11th ~~the~~Judicial ~~terms~~Circuit ofIn ~~said~~and ~~Contract~~For Miami-Dade ~~including~~County, $1Florida,~~192 for~~ ~~attorney~~Case ~~and~~No.: ~~court~~14029771CA01 ~~fees~~Civil ~~incurred~~Division, alleging breach of contract by ~~Billsoft~~the ~~for~~Company aand ~~total~~seeking damages of no less than $1743,~~968~~110. ~~The~~As ~~Company~~of ~~has~~the ~~reached~~date aof ~~settlement~~this ~~agreement~~filing, onthe ~~April 24,~~parties ~~2014~~have tosettled ~~make~~the case for $143,~~000~~110 ~~monthly~~and ~~payments~~the ~~until~~first ~~the~~installment has ~~debt~~been ispaid ~~satisfied.~~according ~~The~~to ~~balance~~the ~~due~~settlement atagreement. ~~September~~At 30March 31, ~~2014~~2015, isthe balance remaining of $1240,~~969~~110 ~~which~~ is recorded in accounts payable.

On ~~July~~April 303, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~was~~received ~~served with~~ a ~~complaint~~collection ~~from~~letter ~~QVC,~~from ~~Inc.~~Receivables ~~that~~Control ~~was~~Corporation ~~filed~~threatening inlitigation for breach of contract by the ~~United~~Company ~~States~~and ~~District~~seeking ~~Court~~damages of no less than $247,500. ~~for~~As of the ~~Eastern~~filing ~~District~~date of ~~Pennsylvania~~this report, ~~Case~~the ~~No.:~~parties ~~2:14-cv-04406-LS, alleging~~have ~~breach~~settle ofthe ~~contract~~case byfor $10,000 and the ~~Company~~first ~~and~~installment ~~seeking~~has been ~~damages~~paid ofaccording noto ~~less~~the ~~than~~settlement ~~$95,798~~agreement. ~~The~~ ~~action~~As isof ~~presently~~March in31, 2015, the ~~discovery~~amount ~~stage.~~settled ~~The~~has ~~Company~~been ~~intends~~accrued toby ~~vigorously~~the ~~defend~~Company ~~this~~and is ~~action~~recorded in accounts payable.

On November 5, 2014, Telestrata, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed an action against the company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida titled: Telestrata, LLC v. NetTAlk.com., Inc. et al., 1:14-cv-24137. The Complaint makes ~~direct~~ claims ~~against~~derivatively on behalf of the Company’s ~~and its~~shareholders for an injunction ordering the Company’s management ~~for~~to: (1) aturn ~~declaratory~~over ~~judgment~~to ~~stating~~ the ~~amount~~Company ofall ~~shares~~documents, ~~owned~~data byand other property; (2) prohibiting current management isfrom ~~inaccurate;~~accessing ~~(2)~~the anCompany’s ~~accounting~~computer systems; (3) ~~breach~~prohibiting ofcurrent ~~contract~~management ~~for~~from representing anthey ~~unspecified~~are ~~amount~~employed ofwith ~~damages~~the Company; (4) ~~fraudulent~~suspending ~~inducement~~Anastasios ~~for~~Kyriakides anfrom ~~unspecified~~his ~~amount~~position as chairman of ~~damages~~the board of directors; and (5) an ~~equitable~~preventing ~~lien;~~the Company and ~~conspiracy.~~its ~~The~~employees ~~Company~~from ~~will~~disclosing ~~respond~~any information to ~~the~~current management. The Complaint also asmakes ~~required~~derivative byclaims ~~the~~for ~~Court.~~breach ~~The~~of ~~Company~~fiduciary ~~denies~~duty ~~all~~against ~~such~~current management and seeks a declaratory judgment that holding ~~claims~~the employment agreements between the Company and ~~intends~~Anastasios toKyriakides, ~~vigorously~~Kenneth ~~defend~~Hosfeld, ~~this~~Nick ~~action~~Kyriakides, Steven Healy, and Garry Paxinos are void.

WeThe ~~are~~Complaint ~~aggressively~~makes ~~defending~~direct ~~all~~claims ofagainst the ~~lawsuits~~Company and ~~claims~~its ~~described~~management ~~above.~~for: ~~While~~(1) wea dodeclaratory ~~not~~judgment ~~believe~~stating ~~these~~the ~~aforementioned~~amount ~~claims~~of ~~will~~shares ~~have~~owned aby ~~material~~current ~~adverse~~management ~~effect~~is oninaccurate; ~~our~~(2) ~~financial~~an ~~position,~~accounting; ~~given~~(3) ~~the~~breach ~~uncertainty and unpredictability~~ of ~~litigation~~contract ~~there~~for ~~can~~an beunspecified noamount ~~assurance~~ of nodamages; ~~material~~(4) ~~adverse~~fraudulent ~~effect.~~inducement ~~The~~for ~~Company~~an ~~is engaged~~unspecified inamount ~~other legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course~~ of ~~business,~~damages ~~none~~(5) an ofequitable ~~which~~lien; ~~are~~and ~~believed to be material to the Company~~conspiracy.

The Company moved to dismiss this action. By Order of the Court, dated April 27, 2015, the Court denied the motion in its entirety. Also, by Order, dated April 27, 2015, the Court consolidated this action with the action below to quiet title. The Company is required to serve and file its Answer and Counterclaims on or before May 18, 2015. The Company denies the material allegations of the Complaint and intends to vigorously defend this action.

On or about December 24, 2014, the Company filed an action against Telestrata, LLC in Florida State Court seeking to quiet title on its property and for slander of title based on Telestrata placing a mortgage on the property without the Company’s authorization. On February 4, 2015, Telestrata, LLC removed this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. As discussed above, by Order, dated April 27, 2015, the Court consolidated this action with the above action commenced by Telestrata against the Company. The Company was directed to assert its claims as counterclaims in the consolidated action.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

For the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2015, there are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in “Item 1A, Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2015..

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company issued 104,~~929~~278,~~000~~137 shares of of common stock to ~~management~~investors who converted convertible debt and ~~employees~~for ~~under~~certain ~~the~~legal ~~2012~~fees ~~Stock~~incurred ~~Option~~by ~~Plan~~the onCompany ~~March~~in 7,the ~~2014~~first quarter of 2015.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

30Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

~~Item~~Not 4Applicable. ~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~

~~Not~~Item ~~Applicable~~5. Other Information.

~~Item~~CHANGES 5.IN ~~Other~~AND ~~Information.~~DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~CHANGES~~On INSeptember ~~AND~~23, ~~DISAGREEMENTS~~2013 ~~WITH~~(the ~~ACCOUNTANTS~~"Dismissal ONDate"), ~~ACCOUNTING~~the ~~AND~~Company ~~FINANCIAL~~dismissed, ~~DISCLOSURE~~its independent certifying accountant. The Company's Board of Directors approved the dismissal on September 23, 2013. There were no disputes or disagreements between Thomas, Howell, Ferguson, CPA's and the Company during the previous fiscal year. Except for the provision of a "Going Concern" opinion, the reports of Thomas, Howell, Ferguson, CPA's on the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and such reports were not qualified, or modified as to audit scope or accounting principle.

NetTalk.com, Inc. changed independent accountants in September 2013 from Thomas, Howell, Ferguson, CPA's to Zachary Salum Auditors P.A. Information regarding the change in independent accountants was reported in NetTalk.com, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 23, 2013. There were no disagreements or any reportable events subject to Item 304(b) requiring disclosure.29

During the year ended December 31, 2012 and through the Dismissal Date, the Company has not had any disagreements with Thomas, Howell, Ferguson, CPA's on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures.

During the year ended December 31, 2012 and through the Dismissal Date, there were no reportable events, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

New independent registered public accounting firm

On September 23, 2013, the Company engaged Zachary Salum Auditors P.A., as its independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the Company's financial statements. The decision to engage Zachary Salum Auditors P.A was approved by the Company's Board of Directors at a Board meeting called for such purpose.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description
3.01		Articles of Incorporation of Net Talk.com Inc. (1)
3.02		Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Net Talk.com Inc. (1)
3.03		Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Net Talk.com Inc. (1)
3.04		Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Net Talk.com Inc. (1)
3.05		Bylaws of Net Talk.com (1)
10.01		Redemption and Debt Restructuring Agreement (2)
10.02		Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement (2)
10.03		6% Secured Promissory Note (2)
10.04		Restricted Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement (3)
10.05		Registration Rights Agreement (3)
10.06		Secured Promissory Note (3)
10.07		Employment Agreements (4)
31.01		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 14, 2014. (5)
31.02		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 14, 2014. (5)
32.01		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 14, 2014. (5)
32.02		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated August 14, 2014. (5)
101.		INS XBRL Instance Document (5)
101.		SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document (5)
101.		CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (5)
101.		LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (5)
101.		PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (5)

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-1 which was filed with the Commission on February 2, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 27, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 24, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on May 7, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed herewith.

3130

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	NetTalk.com, Inc.
Date: November 17, 2014	By	/s/ Anastasios Kyriakides
Date: May 15, 2015	By	/s/ Anastasios Kyriakides
	Anastasios Kyriakides
	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 15, 2015	By	/s/ Steve Healy
	Steve Healy
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · NET TALK.COM, INC.