UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þx QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 30~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-52202

____________________________

~~ANSAZI~~ ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		20-5223382
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
18101 Von Karman Ave. Ste. 330 Irvine, California		92612
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 330 Irvine, California		92612
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(949) 646-8370

(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ x No o

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~August~~March 131, ~~2008~~2009
Common Stock, no par value per share		5,000,000 shares

-1-

ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PAGE	~~PAGE~~
Part I Financial Information	1		3
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)	1		3
Balance Sheet			3
Balance Sheets	1
Statements of Operations	2		4
Statements of Cash Flows	3		5
Notes to Financial Statements	4		6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	7		10
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	11		10
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	11		11
Part II Other Information			13
Item 6. Exhibits	12		13
Signatures	13		13
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 32.1

-2-

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET
	June 30, 2008
	(unaudited)				December 31, 2007
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash & equivalents	$	1,500		$	-
Total Assets	$	1,500		$	-
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable & accrued expenses	$	25,831		$	4,880
Loan from shareholder		1,500			-
Total Liabilities		27,331			4,880
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Common stock (no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
5,000,000 issued and outstanding)		5,000			5,000
Common stock warrants		6,803			6,803
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(37,634	)		(16,683	)
	$	(25,831	)	$	(4,880	)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficiency	$	1,500		$	-

ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.

~~-3-~~(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

~~ANASAZI~~BALANCE ~~CAPITAL CORP. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)~~SHEETS

														Cumulative from
	March 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
	For the three months				For the three months			For the six months			For the six months			July 17, 2006 (Inception)
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
	ended June 30, 2008				ended June 30, 2007			ended June 30, 2008			ended June 30, 2007			through June 30, 2008
ASSETS
Revenue:	$	-			$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
CURRENT ASSETS:
Expenses:
Cash & equivalents	$	470		$	—
General and Administrative		19,770				893			20,951			7,182			37,634
Total Assets	$	470		$	—
Total Expenses		(19,770	)			(893	)		(20,951	)		(7,182	)		(37,634	)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Net (loss) before Income Taxes		(19,770	)			(893	)		(20,951	)		(7,182	)		(37,634	)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Income Tax Expense		-				-			-			-			-
Accounts payable & accrued expenses	$	15,108		$	14,858
Net (loss)	$	(19,770	)		$	(893	)	$	(20,951	)	$	(7,182	)	$	(37,634	)
Loan from shareholder		470			470
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	-			$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Total Liabilities		15,578			15,328
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		5,000,000				5,000,000			5,000,000			5,000,000
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Common stock (no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 5,000,000 issued and outstanding)		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		26,307			26,307
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(41,415	)		(41,165	)
	$	(15,108	)	$	(14,858	)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficiency	$	470		$	470

~~-4-~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
							Cumulative from
	For the six months			For the six months			July 17, 2006 (Inception)
	ended June 30, 2008			ended June 30, 2007			through June 30, 2008
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(20,951	)	$	(7,361	)	$	(37,634	)
Common stock warrants issued for debt		-			-			6,803
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		20,951			7,361			25,831
Net cash used in operating activities		-			-			(5,000	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from loan from shareholder		1,500			-			1,500
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			-			5,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,500			-			6,500
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS		-			-			1,500
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE		-			4,980			-
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE	$	1,500		$	4,980		$	1,500
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
NON-CASH ACTIVITIES	$	-		$	-		$	-

~~-5-~~ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.

~~ANASAZI CAPITAL~~(A ~~CORP.~~DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

~~(A DEVELOPMENT~~STATEMENTS ~~STAGE~~OF ~~COMPANY)~~OPERATIONS

~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~(Unaudited)

JUNE 30, 2008

							Cumulative from
							July 17, 2006
	For the three			For the three			(Inception)
	months ended			months ended			through
	March 31, 2009			March 31, 2008			March 31, 2009

Revenue:	$	—		$	—		$	—

Expenses:
General & Administrative		250			1,182			41,415

Net (loss)	$	(250	)	$	(1,182	)	$	(41,415	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	—		$	—		$	—

Weighted average number of shares used in calculating basic and diluted net loss per share		5,000,000			5,000,000

~~Note 1~~The –accompanying ~~Basis~~notes are an integral part of ~~Presentation~~these financial statements.

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for the presentation of interim financial information, but do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The audited financial statements for the period July 17, 2006 (Inception) through December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 were filed on February 22, 2008 with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are hereby referenced. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and for the period ended July 17, 2006 (Inception) through June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2008.2

~~Note 2~~ANASAZI -CAPITAL ~~Accounting Policies and Operations~~CORP.

~~Organization~~(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

~~Anasazi Capital~~STATEMENTS ~~Corp.~~OF ~~(the~~CASH “Company”), a development stage company, was incorporated in Florida on July 17, 2006. The Company intends to serve as a vehicle to effect an asset acquisition, merger, exchange of capital stock or other type of business combination with a domestic or foreign business. At August 1, 2008, the Company had not yet commenced any formal business operations and all activity to date has related to the Company formation, capital stock issuance and professional fees with regard to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and identification of businesses. The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31st.FLOWS

~~Cash and Cash Equivalents~~(Unaudited)

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

	For the			For the			Cumulative from
	three			three			July 17, 2006
	months			months			(Inception)
	ended			ended			through
	March 31, 2009			March 31, 2008			March 31, 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(250	)	$	(1,182	)	$	(41,415	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		250			—			21,911

Net cash used in operating activities		—			(1,182	)		(19,504	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from shareholder loans		—			—			14,974
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			—			5,000

Net cash provided by financing activities		—			—			19,974


NET INCREASE IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS		—			5,000			470

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE		—			5,000			—

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE	$	—		$	—		$	470

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS
Taxes paid	$	—		$	—		$	—
Interest paid	$	—		$	—		$	—

~~Earnings Per~~The ~~Share~~accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS No. 128”). Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.3

~~Use of~~ANASAZI ~~Estimates~~CAPITAL CORP.

~~The preparation~~(A ofDEVELOPMENT ~~financial~~STAGE ~~statements~~COMPANY) in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Income Taxes~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~The Company~~MARCH ~~accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109~~31, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.2009

~~-6-~~Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

~~Fair~~The accompanying unaudited interim financial ~~Value~~statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of ~~Financial~~the ~~Instruments~~Securities and Exchange Commission for the presentation of interim financial information, but do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The audited financial statements for the period June 17, 2006 (Inception) through December 31, 2008 were filed on September 3, 2009 in the Form 10-K for 2008 with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are hereby referenced. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 and for the period ended June 17, 2006 (Inception) through March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2009.

~~The Company~~Note ~~considers~~2 ~~that~~– ~~the~~Accounting ~~carrying~~Policies ~~amount~~and ofOperations ~~financial instruments, including accounts payable, approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.~~

~~Recent Accounting~~Organization ~~Pronouncements~~

InAnasazi ~~June 2006,~~Capital ~~the FASB issued Interpretation No~~Corp. 48 (~~“FIN~~the ~~No. 48~~“Company”), ~~Accounting~~a ~~for~~development ~~Uncertainty~~stage ~~in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109~~company, ~~which~~was ~~clarifies the~~incorporated ~~accounting for uncertainty~~ in ~~income~~Florida ~~taxes~~on ~~recognized~~July in17, ~~an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No~~2006. ~~109,~~ ~~Accounting~~The ~~for~~Company ~~Income~~intends ~~Taxes. The~~to ~~Interpretation~~serve ~~provides~~as a ~~recognition~~vehicle ~~threshold~~to ~~and~~effect ~~measurement~~an ~~attribute for~~asset ~~the~~acquisition, ~~financial~~merger, ~~statement~~exchange ~~recognition and measurement~~ of acapital ~~tax~~stock ~~position taken~~ or ~~expected~~other totype beof ~~taken~~business incombination with a ~~tax~~domestic ~~return~~or foreign business. ~~Under~~At ~~FIN~~March ~~No. 48~~31, 2009, the Company ~~may recognize~~had ~~the~~not ~~tax~~yet ~~benefit~~commenced ~~from~~any anformal ~~uncertain~~business ~~tax~~operations ~~position~~and ~~only~~all ifactivity itto isdate ~~more likely~~has ~~than~~related ~~not~~to ~~that~~ the ~~tax~~Company ~~position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities~~formation, ~~based~~capital onstock ~~the~~issuance ~~technical~~and ~~merits~~professional offees ~~the~~with ~~position.~~regard ~~The~~to ~~tax benefits~~filings ~~recognized~~with in the ~~financial~~Securities statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and ~~penalties,~~Exchange ~~accounting~~Commission ~~in interim periods, disclosure,~~ and ~~transition.~~identification ~~FIN~~of Nobusinesses. 48 ~~is effective for us beginning July 17, 2006 (inception).~~ The Company’s ~~does~~fiscal ~~not~~year ~~expect~~ends ~~FIN No. 48 to have a material impact~~ on ~~its~~December ~~financial statements~~31st.

~~In June 2006,~~Cash ~~the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-2, “Accounting for Sabbatical Leave~~ and ~~Other~~Cash ~~Similar~~Equivalents Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43.” EITF Issue No. 06-2 requires companies to accrue the costs of compensated absences under a sabbatical or similar benefit arrangement over the requisite service period. EITF Issue No. 06-2 is effective for us beginning July 17, 2006 (inception). The cumulative effect of the application of this consensus on prior period results should be recognized through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. Elective retrospective application is also permitted. The Company does not expect the application of this consensus to have a material impact on its financial statements.

~~Staff Accounting~~The ~~Bulletin~~Company ~~(“SAB”)~~considers ~~No. 108,~~all ~~Considering~~highly ~~the~~liquid ~~Effects~~debt ofinstruments ~~Prior Year~~with ~~Misstatements~~original ~~when~~maturities ~~Quantifying~~of ~~Current~~three ~~Year~~months ~~Misstatements.~~or ~~SAB No. 108~~less ~~requires companies~~ to ~~quantify~~be ~~misstatements~~cash using both a balance sheet (iron curtain) and an income statement (rollover) approach to evaluate whether either approach results in an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors, and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustmentequivalents. ~~SAB No. 108 will not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.~~

~~In September~~Earnings ~~2006,~~Per ~~the~~Share FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. This statement is effective for us beginning July 17, 2006 (inception). The Company currently is assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS No. 157 would have on its financial statements.

~~In February~~The ~~2007,~~Company ~~the~~computes ~~FASB~~earnings ~~issued~~per ~~SFAS~~share in accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards No. ~~159~~ 128, ~~The~~“Earnings ~~Fair~~per ~~Value~~Share” ~~Option~~(“SFAS ~~for~~No. ~~Financial Assets~~128”). ~~and~~Under ~~Financial~~the ~~Liabilities.~~provisions of SFAS No. ~~159~~ ~~gives~~128, usbasic earnings per share is computed by dividing the ~~irrevocable~~ ~~option~~net toincome ~~carry~~(loss) ~~many~~for ~~financial~~the ~~assets~~period ~~and~~by ~~liabilities~~the atweighted ~~fair values,~~average ~~with~~number ~~changes~~of incommon ~~fair~~shares ~~value~~outstanding ~~recognized~~during inthe ~~earnings~~period. ~~SFAS~~Diluted ~~No. 159~~earnings per share is ~~effective~~ ~~for~~computed usby ~~beginning~~dividing ~~July~~the ~~17,~~net ~~2006~~income (~~inception~~loss)~~. The~~ ~~Company~~for ~~is currently~~the ~~assessing~~period by the ~~potential~~weighted ~~impact~~average ~~that~~number ~~adoption~~ of ~~SFAS~~common Noand potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. ~~159~~ ~~will have~~There onwere ~~its~~no ~~financial~~potentially ~~statement~~dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.

~~The~~Use ~~FASB has~~of ~~replaced~~Estimates SFAS No. 141 with a new statement on Business Combinations that changes the way that minority interest is recorded and modified as a parent’s interest in a subsidiary changes. Currently, this change will have no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

The ~~Company~~ ~~does~~preparation ~~not~~of ~~expect~~financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~adoption~~United States of ~~recent~~America ~~accounting~~requires ~~pronouncements~~management to ~~have any~~make ~~material~~estimates ~~impact~~and onassumptions ~~its~~that ~~financial~~affect ~~condition~~certain orreported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results ~~of operations~~could differ from those estimates.

~~-7-~~Fair Value of Financial Instruments

~~Going Concern~~The Company considers that the carrying amount of financial instruments, including accounts payable, approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements do not purport to represent realizable or settlement values. However, the Company has incurred an operating loss. Such loss may impair its ability to obtain additional financing.4

~~This factor~~Recent ~~raises~~Accounting ~~substantial~~Pronouncements doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company has met its historical working capital requirements from sale of capital shares. Owners of the shares, in order not to burden the Company, have agreed to pay its annual audit fees, filing costs and legal fees as long as the board of directors deems it necessary. However, there can be no assurance that such financial support shall be ongoing or available on terms or conditions acceptable to the Company.

~~Loan From~~In ~~Shareholder~~May 2008, the FASB released SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not believe SFAS No. 162 will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~The~~In ~~loan from~~April ~~shareholder~~2009, isthe ~~non~~FASB issued FSP 107-~~interest~~1, ~~bearing~~“Interim ~~and~~Disclosures ~~has~~about noFair ~~definite~~Value ~~terms~~of Financial Instruments” (“FSP 107-1”), which requires disclosures about fair value of ~~repayment~~ financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 also amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of FSP 107-1 on its consolidated financial statement presentation and disclosures.

~~Note 3~~In –May ~~Shareholders~~2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 establishes standards for accounting for and disclosing subsequent events (events which occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued). SFAS No. 165 requires an entity to disclose the date subsequent events were evaluated and whether that evaluation took place on the date financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the Company’s ~~Equity~~financial condition or results of operations. For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, the Company has considered subsequent events through July 31, 2009, which is the date its consolidated condensed financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-Q.

OnIn ~~July 21,~~June ~~2006~~2009, the ~~Company~~FASB issued 5SFAS 167,~~000~~ “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”,~~000~~ ~~shares~~which changes the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of ~~common~~a ~~stock~~variable interest entity (“VIE”) and requires companies to ~~its~~more ~~initial shareholder~~frequently inassess ~~exchange~~whether they must consolidate VIEs. This new standard is effective for $5us beginning on January 1,~~000~~ in2010. ~~cash~~The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on our consolidated condensed financial statements and disclosures.

OnManagement ~~August 14,~~does ~~2007,~~not ~~the~~believe ~~Company~~that ~~issued~~any ~~warrants~~other torecently ~~purchase 262~~issued,~~800~~ ~~shares~~but of its common stock to a consultant to the Company, Law Offices of Michael H. Hoffman, P.A., in exchange for services and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $6,803 pursuant to a Warrant Agreement. These warrants have certain rights identified in the Warrant Agreement, including an exercise price of $.01 per share, a term of five years, a cashless exercise feature, if the strike price of the warrant it exercises is lower than the public market price of a share of the Company’s common stock, a put feature requiring the Company to purchase the warrants if the shares underlying the warrants are not ~~listed~~yet ~~for quotation on a recognized national securities exchange~~effective, ~~the~~accounting ~~Nasdaq~~standards ~~National Market (~~or ~~a similar national quotation system)~~pronouncements, ~~the~~if ~~over-the-counter~~currently ~~electronic bulletin board or the Pink Sheets (each a “Public Market”)~~adopted, ~~and~~would ~~the warrants~~ have ~~anti-dilution~~ ~~protection,~~a ~~such~~material that the holder shall continue to have the same percentage of ownership and the same percentage of voting rights of the class of the Company’s common stock regardless whether the Company or its successors or its assigns may thereafter increase or decrease the authorized number of shares of the Company’s common stock or increase or decrease the number of shares issued and outstanding. The anti-dilution rights will continue in effect ~~until~~on ~~two years from~~ the ~~date that all shares of the~~ Company’s ~~common stock~~financial ~~then purchasable under the warrant are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”)~~statements. The non-dilution rights will not attach to any shares sold in open market transactions. The warrants have no market at the present time, because they are not exercisable until the Company’s shares of common stock are listed on a Public Market.

~~Note~~Going ~~- 4 Income Taxes~~Concern

~~Deferred income~~The ~~taxes~~Company’s ~~reflect~~financial ~~the~~statements ~~net~~are ~~income~~prepared ~~tax~~using ~~effect~~generally ofaccepted ~~temporary~~accounting ~~differences~~principles ~~between~~ in the ~~carrying~~United ~~amounts~~States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and ~~liabilities~~the ~~for~~satisfaction ~~financial~~of ~~reporting purposes~~liabilities ~~and~~in ~~amounts~~the ~~used~~normal ~~for~~course ~~income~~of ~~taxes~~business. The Company’s ~~deferred~~has ~~income~~not ~~tax assets~~yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and ~~liabilities~~allow ~~consist~~it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the ~~following:~~Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Net operating loss carryforward	$	--
Deferred tax asset		340
Valuation allowance		(340	)
Net Deferred tax asset	$	--

~~Net operating~~Management’s ~~loss~~Plan ~~carryforwards totaled approximately $37,634 at June 30, 2008. The net operating loss carryforwards will begin~~ to ~~expire~~Continue inas ~~the year 2026 if not utilized. After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded~~ a ~~valuation~~Going ~~allowance at June 30, 2008 due to the doubtfulness of realizing the deferred tax assets.~~Concern

~~-8-~~The Company has met its historical working capital requirements from the sale of its capital shares and loans from shareholders. In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses, and (2) seeking out and completing a merger with an existing operating company. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ~~reconciliation~~ ability of the ~~income~~Company ~~tax~~to ~~computed~~continue atas ~~the~~a ~~U.S.~~going ~~Federal~~concern ~~statutory~~is ~~rate~~dependent upon its ability to ~~income~~ ~~tax~~successfully ~~expense~~accomplish ~~for~~the plans described in the ~~period~~preceding ~~June~~paragraph ~~30,~~and ~~2008:~~eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. There can be no assurance that such financial support shall be ongoing or available on terms or conditions acceptable to the Company.

Tax expense (benefit) at Federal rate (34%)	$	(680	)
Federal bracket adjustment		340
State income tax, net of Federal benefit		--
Change in valuation allowance		340
Net income tax (benefit) allowance	$	--

Development Stage Risk

~~Utilization~~ Since its inception, the Company has been dependent upon the receipt of capital investment to fund its continuing activities. In addition to the normal risks associated with a new business venture, there can be no assurance that the Company'’s ~~net~~business ~~operating~~plan ~~loss~~will ~~carryforwards~~be ~~are~~successfully ~~limited~~executed. ~~based~~Our ability to execute our business plan will depend on ~~changes in~~our ~~ownership~~ability asto ~~defined~~obtain inadditional ~~Internal~~financing ~~Revenue~~and ~~Code~~achieve ~~Section~~a ~~382~~profitable level of operations. There can be no assurance that sufficient financing will be obtained. Further, we cannot give any assurance that we will generate substantial revenues or that our business operations will prove to be profitable.

~~-9-~~Note 3 – Shareholders’ Equity

~~Item 2. Management’s~~On ~~Discussion~~July ~~and~~21, ~~Analysis~~2006, ofthe ~~Financial~~Company ~~Condition~~issued ~~and Results~~5,000,000 shares of ~~Operations~~common stock to its initial shareholder in exchange for $5,000 in cash.

~~Overview~~On August 14, 2007, the Company issued warrants to purchase 262,800 shares of its common stock to a consultant to the Company, Law Offices of Michael H. Hoffman, P.A., in exchange for services and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $6,803 pursuant to a Warrant Agreement. These warrants have certain rights identified in the Warrant Agreement, including an exercise price of $.01 per share, a term of five years, a cashless exercise feature, if the strike price of the warrant it exercises is lower than the public market price of a share of the Company’s common stock, a put feature requiring the Company to purchase the warrants if the shares underlying the warrants are not listed for quotation on a recognized national securities exchange, the Nasdaq National Market (or a similar national quotation system), the over-the-counter electronic bulletin board or the Pink Sheets (each a “Public Market”), and the warrants have anti-dilution protection, such that the holder shall continue to have the same percentage of ownership and the same percentage of voting rights of the class of the Company’s common stock regardless whether the Company or its successors or its assigns may thereafter increase or decrease the authorized number of shares of the Company’s common stock or increase or decrease the number of shares issued and outstanding. The anti-dilution rights will continue in effect until two years from the date that all shares of the Company’s common stock then purchasable under the warrant are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The non-dilution rights will not attach to any shares sold in open market transactions. The warrants have no market at the present time, because they are not exercisable until the Company’s shares of common stock are listed on a Public Market.

~~Anasazi Capital~~During ~~Corp.~~2008, ~~a Florida corporation (~~the “Company”,’s ~~“us”,~~sole ~~“we”~~shareholder ~~and~~made ~~“our”),~~several isloans ~~a development stage company conducting no business operations, other than our efforts~~ to ~~effect~~the aCompany ~~business combination with a target business that desires~~ to ~~utilize~~ ~~our~~fund ~~status~~its asoperations; aand ~~reporting~~in ~~corporation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~December, ~~as amended (the “Exchange Act”)~~2008, ~~which~~these weloans ~~consider~~were ~~to have significant growth potential~~forgiven. To ~~date,~~As we have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenue. We have not generated any cash flows from operations. We cannot predict to what extent our liquidity and capital resources will be diminished prior to the consummation of aDecember ~~business combination or whether our capital will be further depleted by the operating losses~~31, ~~if any~~2008, of the ~~target~~total ~~business~~balance ~~with which we may effectuate a business combination. The continuation~~ of ~~our~~these ~~business~~loans iswas ~~dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate financing arrangements~~$14,504 ~~effectuate~~and awas ~~business~~recorded ~~combination~~as ~~and, ultimately,~~additional ~~engage~~ paid-in ~~future profitable operations~~capital.

Presently, we are not in a position to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months, as we do not have any cash. From inception, our shareholders have committed to make loans to us on an as needed basis. There are no further commitments, agreements or understandings of any kind with respect to any loans or advances to be made on our behalf.6

~~Prior~~Item to the occurrence of a business combination, we may be required to raise capital through the sale or issuance of additional securities or obtain borrowings or advances from third party sources in order to ensure that we can pay our operating expenses2. It isManagement’s ~~also~~Discussion ~~possible~~and ~~that~~Analysis ~~a business combination might not occur during the next 12 months, if at all. In the event we are unable to pay our operating expenses prior to the effectuation~~ of aFinancial ~~business combination,~~Condition ~~we may cease operations~~ and aResults ~~business~~of ~~combination may not occur.~~Operations

~~Critical~~The following discussion and analysis should be read ~~Accounting~~in ~~Policies~~conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing in this Form 10-Q and ~~Estimates~~in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed on September 3, 2009 with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are hereby referenced.

AThe ~~summary of~~statements ~~significant~~in ~~accounting~~this ~~policies~~report isinclude ~~provided~~forward-looking instatements. ~~Note~~These 1forward-looking tostatements are based on our ~~financial~~ management’s current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. You should not rely upon these forward-looking statements ~~included~~as predictions of future events because we cannot assure you that the events or circumstances reflected in ~~our~~these ~~initial~~statements ~~filing~~will onbe ~~Form~~achieved 10or will occur. You can identify a forward-Klooking ~~with~~statement by the ~~Securities~~use ~~and Exchange~~of ~~Commission. Our~~the ~~sole~~forward-terminology, ~~officer~~including ~~and~~words ~~director~~such as “may”, “will”, “believes”, ~~that~~“anticipates”, “estimates”, “expects”, “continues”, “should”, “seeks”, “intends”, “plans”, and/or words of similar import, or the negative of these words and phrases or other ~~application~~variations of these ~~policies~~words onand phrases or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things: our sales, results of operations and anticipated cash flows; capital expenditures; depreciation and amortization expenses; sales, general and administrative expenses; our ability to maintain and develop relationship with our existing and potential future customers; and, our ability to maintain a ~~consistent~~level ~~basis~~of ~~enables~~investment that is required to remain competitive. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: variability of our revenues and financial performance; risks associated with technological changes; the ~~Company~~acceptance of our products in the marketplace by existing and potential customers; disruption of operations or increases in expenses due to our involvement with litigation or caused by civil or political unrest or other catastrophic events; general ~~provide~~economic ~~useful~~conditions, government mandates and ~~reliable~~conditions ~~financial~~in ~~information~~the ~~about~~gaming/entertainment industry in particular; and, the ~~Company's~~continued ~~operating results~~employment of our key personnel and ~~financial~~other ~~condition~~risks associated with competition.

~~The preparation~~For a discussion of ~~financial~~the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements insee ~~conformity~~the ~~with~~“Liquidity ~~generally~~and ~~accepted accounting~~Capital ~~principles~~Resources” ~~requires~~section ~~our~~under ~~sole~~“Management’s ~~officer~~Discussion and ~~director~~Analysis toof ~~make~~Financial ~~estimates~~ Condition and ~~assumptions~~Results ~~that~~of ~~affect~~Operations” ~~the~~in ~~reported~~this ~~amounts~~item of ~~assets~~this report and ~~liabilities~~the other risks and ~~disclosure~~ ofuncertainties ~~contingent~~that ~~assets~~are ~~and~~set ~~liabilities~~forth atelsewhere ~~the~~in ~~date~~this ofreport ~~the~~or ~~financial statements~~detailed ~~and~~in ~~the~~our ~~reported~~other ~~amounts~~Securities ofand ~~revenues~~Exchange Commission reports and ~~expenses~~filings. ~~during~~We ~~the reporting~~believe ~~period~~it is important to communicate our expectations. ~~Actual~~However, ~~results~~our ~~will~~management ~~differ~~disclaims ~~from~~any ~~those~~obligation ~~estimates~~to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

~~Plan of Operation~~Overview

~~The Company~~Anasazi ~~was~~Capital ~~incorporated~~Corp., ina Florida oncorporation ~~July~~(the 17“Company”, ~~2006. We~~“us”, ~~intend~~“we” ~~to serve~~and as“our”), is a ~~vehicle~~development tostage ~~effect~~company anconducting ~~acquisition,~~no ~~merger~~business operations, ~~exchange~~other ofthan ~~capital~~our ~~stock or~~efforts ~~other~~to ~~type~~effect ofa business combination with a ~~domestic~~target ~~or foreign~~ business~~. Since~~ that desires to utilize our ~~inception~~status as a reporting corporation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which we ~~had~~consider to have significant growth potential. To date, we have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenue. We have not ~~commenced~~generated any ~~formal business~~cash flows from operations. ~~and~~We ~~all~~cannot ~~activity~~predict to ~~date~~what ~~has~~extent ~~related~~our liquidity and capital resources will be diminished prior to the ~~Company’s formation,~~consummation ~~capital~~of ~~stock~~a ~~issuance,~~business ~~professional~~combination ~~fees~~or ~~with~~whether ~~regard~~our tocapital will be further depleted by the ~~subject matter~~operating losses, if any, of the ~~filings~~target business with ~~the~~which ~~Securities~~we ~~and~~may ~~Exchange~~effectuate ~~Commission~~a ~~and identification~~business combination. The continuation of ~~businesses~~our business is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate financing arrangements, effectuate a business combination and, ultimately, engage in future profitable operations.

~~Item 3~~Presently, we are not in a position to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months, as we do not have any cash. ~~Quantitative~~From ~~and Qualitative~~inception, ~~Disclosures~~our ~~About~~shareholders ~~Market~~have ~~Risk~~committed to make loans to us on an as needed basis. There are no further commitments, agreements or understandings of any kind with respect to any loans or advances to be made on our behalf.

We have not utilized any derivative financial instruments such as futures contracts, options and swaps, forward foreign exchange contracts or interest rate swaps and futures. We believe that adequate controls are in place to monitor any hedging activities. We do not currently have any sales or own assets and operate facilities in countries outside the United States and, consequently, we are not effected by foreign currency fluctuations or exchange rate changes. Overall, we believe that our exposure to interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate changes is not material to our financial condition or results of operations.7

~~-10-~~Prior to the occurrence of a business combination, we may be required to raise capital through the sale or issuance of additional securities or obtain borrowings or advances from third party sources in order to ensure that we can pay our operating expenses. It is also possible that a business combination might not occur during the next 12 months, if at all. In the event we are unable to pay our operating expenses prior to the effectuation of a business combination, we may cease operations and a business combination may not occur.

~~Item 4. Controls~~Going ~~and~~Concern ~~Procedures~~

~~We maintain~~Our ~~disclosure~~financial ~~controls~~statements ~~and~~have ~~procedures~~been ~~that~~prepared ~~are~~on ~~designed~~the tobasis ~~ensure~~of ~~that~~accounting ~~the information~~principles ~~required~~applicable to bea ~~disclosed~~going inconcern. ~~the~~As ~~reports~~a result, they do not include adjustments that would be necessary if we ~~file~~were ~~under~~unable ~~the Exchange~~to ~~Act~~continue isas ~~recorded,~~a ~~processed,~~going ~~summarized~~concern and ~~reported~~would ~~within~~therefore ~~the~~be ~~time periods~~obligated ~~specified~~to realize assets and discharge our liabilities other than in the ~~Securities~~normal ~~and~~course ~~Exchange~~of ~~Commission’s~~operations. ~~rules~~As ~~and~~reflected ~~forms, and~~in ~~that~~the ~~such~~accompanying ~~information~~financial statements, the Company is ~~accumulated~~in ~~and~~the ~~communicated~~development tostage ~~our~~with ~~management~~no operations or revenues, ~~including~~ ~~our~~has ~~President~~used ~~and~~cash ~~Treasurer~~flows in operations of $19,504 asfrom ~~appropriate~~inception of June 17, 2006 to ~~allow~~March ~~timely~~31, ~~decisions regarding~~2009 ~~required~~and ~~disclosures. In~~has ~~designing~~an ~~and~~accumulated ~~evaluating~~deficit ~~the disclosure~~of ~~controls~~$41,415 ~~and~~through ~~procedures~~March 31, ~~management~~2009. ~~recognized~~This ~~that~~raises ~~any~~substantial ~~controls~~doubt ~~and procedures,~~about noour ~~matter~~ability ~~how~~to ~~well~~continue ~~designed~~as ~~and~~a ~~operated~~going concern, ~~can~~as ~~only~~expressed ~~provide reasonable~~by ~~assurance~~our ofauditors ~~achieving~~in ~~the~~its ~~desired~~opinion ~~control~~on ~~objectives,~~our ~~and~~financial statements included in ~~reaching~~ athis ~~reasonable~~report. ~~level~~The ability of ~~assurance,~~the ~~management~~Company ~~necessarily~~to ~~was~~continue ~~required~~as ~~to apply~~a ~~its~~going ~~judgment~~concern inis ~~evaluating~~dependent on the ~~cost-benefit~~Company’s ability ~~relationship~~to ofraise ~~possible controls~~additional capital and ~~procedures~~implement its business plan.

~~As required~~We byhave ~~SEC~~not ~~Rule~~yet ~~13a-15(b),~~established weany ~~carried~~source ~~out~~of anrevenues ~~evaluation,~~sufficient ~~under~~to ~~the supervision~~cover ~~and~~our ~~with~~operating ~~the~~costs ~~participation~~and ofallow ~~our~~us ~~management,~~to ~~including~~continue ~~our President~~as ~~and~~a ~~Treasurer,~~going ofconcern. ~~the~~Our ~~effectiveness~~ability ofto ~~the~~continue ~~design~~as ~~and~~a ~~operation~~going ofconcern ~~our disclosure~~is ~~controls~~dependent ~~and~~on ~~procedures~~us asobtaining ofadequate ~~the~~capital ~~end~~or ofloans ~~our~~to ~~first~~fund ~~fiscal~~operating ~~quarter covered~~losses byuntil ~~this~~we ~~report~~become profitable. ~~Based~~If onwe ~~the~~are ~~foregoing~~unable to obtain adequate capital or loans, ~~our~~we ~~President~~could ~~and~~be ~~Treasurer concluded~~forced ~~that~~to ~~our~~cease ~~disclosure~~operations. ~~controls~~There ~~and~~can ~~procedures~~be ~~were~~no ~~effective~~assurance that we will operate at ~~the reasonable~~a ~~assurance~~profit ~~level~~or additional debt or equity financing will be available, or if available, can be obtained on satisfactory terms.

~~There~~Critical ~~has been~~Accounting noPolicies ~~change~~and in our internal controls over financial reporting during our first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.Estimates

~~Management’s~~A summary of significant accounting policies is ~~Report~~provided in Note 2 to our financial statements included in our filing on ~~Internal~~Form ~~Control~~10-K ~~over~~with ~~Financial~~the ~~Reporting~~Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2009. Our sole officer and director believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide useful and reliable financial information about the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

The ~~management~~ preparation of ~~the~~financial ~~Company~~statements isin ~~responsible~~conformity ~~for~~with ~~establishing~~generally ~~and~~accepted ~~maintaining adequate~~accounting ~~internal~~principles ~~control~~requires ~~over~~our ~~financial~~sole ~~reporting. Internal~~officer ~~control over~~and ~~financial~~director ~~reporting~~to ismake ~~defined~~estimates inand ~~Rule~~assumptions ~~13a-15(f)~~that oraffect ~~15d-15(f)~~the ~~promulgated under~~reported ~~the~~amounts ~~Securities~~of ~~Exchange~~assets ~~Act~~and ofliabilities ~~1934~~and asdisclosure aof ~~process~~contingent ~~designed~~assets ~~by,~~and orliabilities ~~under~~at the ~~supervision~~ date of, the ~~Company’s principal executive and~~ financial ~~officers~~statements and ~~effected~~ by the ~~Company’s~~reported ~~board~~amounts of ~~directors,~~revenues ~~management~~ and ~~other~~expenses ~~personnel,~~during ~~to provide reasonable assurance regarding~~ the ~~reliability of financial~~ reporting ~~and~~ ~~the~~period. ~~preparation~~Actual ofresults ~~financial~~will ~~statements~~differ ~~for~~from ~~external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes~~ those ~~policies and procedures that:~~estimates.

·Plan ~~Pertain to the maintenance~~ of ~~records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;~~Operation

·The ~~Provide~~Company ~~reasonable~~was ~~assurance~~incorporated ~~that~~in ~~transactions~~Florida ~~are~~on ~~recorded~~June 17, 2006. We intend to serve as ~~necessary~~a vehicle to ~~permit~~effect ~~preparation~~an acquisition, merger, exchange of ~~financial~~capital ~~statements~~stock inor ~~accordance~~other type of business combination with ~~generally~~a ~~accepted~~domestic ~~accounting~~or ~~principles~~foreign business. Since our inception, ~~and~~we ~~that~~had ~~receipts~~not commenced any formal business operations and ~~expenditures~~all ofactivity to date has related to the Company’s ~~are~~formation, ~~being~~capital ~~made~~stock ~~only~~issuance, inprofessional ~~accordance~~fees with ~~authorizations~~regard ofto ~~management~~the ~~and~~subject ~~directors~~matter of the ~~Company;~~filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and identification of businesses.

·Summary ~~Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection~~ of Results ~~unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition~~ of ~~the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.~~Operations

~~Because of~~Any ~~its~~measurement ~~inherent~~and ~~limitations,~~comparison ~~internal~~of ~~control~~revenues ~~over~~and ~~financial~~expenses ~~reporting~~from ~~may~~continuing ~~not prevent~~operations orshould ~~detect~~not ~~misstatements.~~be ~~Projections~~considered ofnecessarily ~~any~~indicative ~~evaluation~~or ofinterpolated ~~effectiveness to~~as ~~future~~the ~~periods~~trend ~~are subject~~ to ~~the~~forecast ~~risk~~our ~~that~~future ~~controls~~revenues ~~may~~and ~~become~~results ~~inadequate because~~ of ~~changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate~~operations.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2008. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The COSO framework is based upon five integrated components of control: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communications and ongoing monitoring.8

~~Based~~Results ~~on the~~for ~~assessment performed, management has concluded that~~ the ~~Company’s~~Quarter ~~internal control~~Ended ~~over~~March ~~financial reporting is effective and provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation of its financial statements as of June 30~~31, ~~2008~~2009 inCompared ~~accordance~~to ~~with~~March ~~generally accepted accounting principles. Further~~31, ~~management has not identified any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of June 30,~~ 2008.

~~This quarterly~~Revenues. ~~report~~The ~~does not include an attestation report of the~~ Company’s ~~registered~~ ~~public~~revenues ~~accounting~~for ~~firm~~the ~~regarding~~three ~~internal~~months ~~control~~ended ~~over~~March ~~financial reporting. Management’s~~31, ~~report~~2009 ~~was~~were ~~not~~$0. ~~subject~~The ~~to attestation by the~~ Company’s ~~registered~~revenues ~~public~~for ~~accounting~~the ~~firm~~three ~~pursuant~~months toended ~~temporary~~March ~~rules~~31, of2008 ~~the Securities~~were ~~and~~$0. ~~Exchange~~No ~~Commission~~revenues ~~that~~occurred ~~permit~~during ~~the~~these ~~Company~~periods, tobecause ~~provide~~no ~~only management’s~~there ~~report~~were inno ~~this annual report~~sales.

/Cost of Revenues. The Company’s/ ~~Paul Garcia~~cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $0. The Company’s cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $0. There was not cost of revenues, because no sales were made by the Company.

~~CEO~~Gross Profit/Loss. The Company’s gross profit/loss for the three months ended March 31, ~~President~~ 2009 was $0. The Company’s gross profit/loss for the three months ended March 31, ~~Secretary~~2008 was $0. No gross profit/loss occurred during these periods, ~~Treasurer~~because ~~and~~no ~~Director~~there were no sales.

~~-11-~~General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $250 compared to $1,182 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of professional service fees.

~~PART II~~Net ~~OTHER~~Loss. ~~INFORMATION~~Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $250 as compared to $1,182 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 was primarily related to general and administrative expenses and no revenues for the periods indicated.

~~Item 6~~As of three months ended March 31, 2009, we had an accumulated deficit of $41,415. ~~Exhibits~~

~~(a) Exhibits~~Impact of Inflation

~~Exhibit~~We 31believe that the rate of inflation has had negligible effect on our operations.1 ~~302~~We ~~Certification~~believe –we ~~Paul~~can ~~Garcia~~absorb most, if not all, increased non-controlled operating costs by increasing sales prices, whenever deemed necessary and by operating our Company in the most efficient manner possible.

~~Exhibit~~Liquidity ~~32.1~~and ~~906~~Capital ~~Certification~~Resources ~~– Paul Garcia~~

~~SIGNATURES~~The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. Since its inception, the Company has been funded by its shareholders.

~~Pursuant to~~As ~~the requirements~~ of ~~the~~March ~~Securities~~31, ~~Exchange~~2009, ~~Act~~total ofcurrent ~~1934,~~assets ~~the~~were ~~registrant~~$470 ~~has duly~~consisting ~~caused~~of ~~this~~cash. ~~report~~As toof beDecember ~~signed~~31, on2008, ~~its~~total ~~behalf~~current byassets ~~the~~were ~~undersigned~~$470 ~~thereunto duly~~consisting ~~authorized~~of cash.

~~ANASAZI CAPITAL~~As ~~CORP~~of March 31, 2009, total current liabilities were $15,578, which consisted of accounts payable in the amount of $15,108 and a shareholder loan in the amount of $470. As of December 31, 2008, total current liabilities were $4,880, which consisted of solely of accounts payable. We had negative net working capital of $(15,108) as of March 31, 2009, compared to negative net working capital of $(4,880) as of December 31, 2008.

~~DATE: August 5~~During the three months ended March 31, 2009, operating activities used cash of $0. During the three months ended March 31, 2008 ~~By: /s/~~, ~~Paul Garcia~~ operating activities used cash of $1,182. The cash used by operating activities was due primarily to general and administrative expenses.

~~Paul Garcia~~Intangible Assets

~~President~~There were no intangible assets during the three month periods ended March 31, ~~Secretary~~ 2009 and ~~Treasurer~~from the period June 17, 2006 (inception) through March 31, 2009.

~~(Principal Accounting Officer and Authorized Officer)~~9

~~-12-~~Material Commitments

~~Anasazi Capital~~There ~~Corp~~were no material commitments during the three month period ended March 31, 2009 and from the period June 16, 2008 (inception) through March 31, 2009.

~~Index~~Off-Balance ~~to Exhibits~~Sheet Arrangements

~~Exhibit Number Description~~We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or any anticipate entering into any off-balance arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

~~Exhibit~~Recent ~~31.1~~Accounting ~~302 Certification – Paul Garcia~~Pronouncements

~~Exhibit~~In 32May 2008, the FASB released SFAS No.1 ~~906~~162, ~~Certification~~“The –Hierarchy ~~Paul~~of ~~Garcia~~Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not believe SFAS No. 162 will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-131, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP 107-1”), which requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP 107-1 also amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting. FSP 107-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of FSP 107-1 on its consolidated financial statement presentation and disclosures.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 establishes standards for accounting for and disclosing subsequent events (events which occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued). SFAS No. 165 requires an entity to disclose the date subsequent events were evaluated and whether that evaluation took place on the date financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, the Company has considered subsequent events through July 31, 2009, which is the date its consolidated condensed financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-Q.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, which changes the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate VIEs. This new standard is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on our consolidated condensed financial statements and disclosures.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards or pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Treasurer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our first fiscal quarter covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our President and Treasurer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

•

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

•

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

•

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2009. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The COSO framework is based upon five integrated components of control: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communications and ongoing monitoring.

Based on the assessment performed, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective and provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation of its financial statements as of March 31, 2009 in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Further, management has not identified any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2009.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

/s/ Paul Garcia

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1

302 Certification – Paul Garcia

Exhibit 32.1

906 Certification – Paul Garcia

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP.

DATE: September 2, 2009

By:

/s/ Paul Garcia

Paul Garcia

President, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Accounting Officer and Authorized Officer)

Anasazi Capital Corp.

Index to Exhibits

Exhibit Number

Description

Exhibit 31.1

302 Certification – Paul Garcia

Exhibit 32.1

906 Certification – Paul Garcia

Filing Compare · ANASAZI CAPITAL CORP