UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-K

☒ ☐ Annual Report Under Section 13 or 15(~~Mark~~d) ~~one~~of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the years ended December 31, 2017 Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

~~x Annual~~Commission ~~Report~~file ~~Under~~number ~~Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~000-54770

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

o Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-28453

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	~~45-0704149~~	45-0704149
(State of incorporation)	(IRS Employer ID Number)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1137 Highway 80 East, Post Office Box 1218, Tombstone, AZ		86638
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

~~1137~~Registrant’s ~~Highway~~telephone ~~80 East~~number, ~~Post~~including ~~Office~~area ~~Box~~code: ~~1218,~~(520) ~~Tombstone, AZ 86638~~457-9404

~~(Address~~Securities ofregistered ~~principal~~pursuant ~~executive~~to ~~offices~~Section 12(b) of the Act:

(520) 457-9404

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock - $0.001 par value	MCPI	OTCMKTS

~~(Issuer’s~~Securities ~~telephone~~registered ~~number~~pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common stock

~~MCPI,~~Indicate ~~Inc~~by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

~~(Former~~Indicate ~~name,~~by ~~former~~check ~~address~~mark ~~and~~if ~~former~~the ~~fiscal~~registrant ~~year,~~is ifnot ~~changed~~required ~~since~~to ~~last~~file ~~report~~reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

~~Securities~~Indicate ~~registered~~by ~~pursuant~~check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 1213 or 15(bd) of the Securities Exchange Act -of ~~None~~1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☐ Yes ☒ No

~~Securities~~Indicate ~~registered~~by ~~pursuant~~check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to ~~Section~~be 12submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (g)§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the ~~Act:~~preceding -12 ~~Common~~months ~~Stock~~(or -for ~~$0.001~~such ~~par~~shorter ~~value~~period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant is a ~~well~~large ~~known~~accelerated ~~seasoned~~filer, ~~issuer~~an accelerated filer, asa ~~defined~~non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule ~~405~~12b-2 of the ~~Securities~~Exchange Act. ~~Yes o No x~~

~~Indicate~~Large byaccelerated ~~check~~filer ~~mark~~☐ ifAccelerated ~~the~~filer ~~registrant~~☐ isNon-accelerated ~~not~~filer ~~required~~☒ toSmaller ~~file~~reporting ~~reports~~company ~~pursuant~~☒ toEmerging ~~Section~~growth 13company ~~or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x~~☐

~~Indicate~~If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if the registrant has ~~(1)~~elected ~~filed~~not ~~all reports required~~ to beuse ~~filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of~~ the ~~Exchange~~extended ~~Act~~transition ~~during~~period ~~the~~for completing ~~past~~with 12any ~~months~~new (or ~~for~~revised ~~such~~financial ~~shorter~~accounting ~~period~~standards ~~the~~provided ~~Company~~pursuant ~~was required~~ to ~~file~~Section ~~such reports), and~~ 13(2a) ~~has~~of ~~been subject to such filing requirements for~~ the ~~past~~Exchange ~~90 days~~Act. ~~Yes x No o~~☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ~~has~~is ~~submitted~~a ~~electronically~~shell ~~and~~company ~~posted~~(as ondefined ~~its~~by ~~corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to~~ Rule ~~405~~12b-2 of ~~Regulation S-T during~~ the ~~preceding~~Exchange ~~12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post files~~Act). ☐ Yes x ☒ No o

~~Indicate~~ by The ~~check~~aggregate ~~mark~~market ifvalue ~~disclosure~~ of ~~delinquent~~voting ~~filers~~and ~~pursuant~~non-voting tocommon ~~Item~~equity ~~405~~held ofby ~~Regulation S~~non-Kaffiliates isas ~~not~~of ~~contained~~July ~~herein~~1, ~~and~~2019 ~~will~~was ~~not~~approximately ~~be contained~~$2,271,600 tobased ~~the~~upon ~~best of the registrant’s knowledge~~75,720,000 inshares ~~definitive proxy or information statements incorporated~~ held by ~~reference in Part III of this Form 10~~non-~~K or any amendment to this Form 10-K~~affiliates. o

~~Indicate~~APPLICABLE byONLY ~~check~~TO ~~mark~~ISSUERS ~~whether~~INVOLVED ~~the~~IN registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):BANKRUPTCY

~~Large~~PROCEEDINGS ~~accelerated~~DURING ~~filer~~THE oPRECEDING ~~Accelerated~~FIVE ~~filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x~~YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ishas afled ~~shell~~all ~~company~~documents ~~(as~~and ~~defined~~reports inrequired ~~Rule~~to ~~12b-2~~be fled by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act): of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confrmed by a court. Yes x ☐ No o☐

~~The~~APPLICABLE ~~aggregate~~ONLY ~~market~~TO ~~value~~CORPORATE ~~of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of April 13, 2017 was approximately $3,232,500 based upon 51,720,000 shares held by non-affiliates.~~ISSUERS:

As of August 13, 2019, there were 360,300,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

AsDOCUMENTS ofINCORPORATED ~~April~~BY ~~13, 2017, there were 336,300,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.~~REFERENCE

None.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017

Index to Contents

		Page Number
Part I
Item 1	Business	3
Item 1A	Risk Factors	45
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	910
Item 2	Properties	910
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	910
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	910
Part II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	911
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	1213
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1213
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	1516
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	1516
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	1516
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	1617
Item 9B	Other Information	1718
Part III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	1718
Item 11	Executive Compensation	1921
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2022
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2123
Item 14	Principal ~~Accounting~~Accountant Fees and Services	2225
Part IV
Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	2325
Signatures		24
Item 16	Form 10-K Summary	25
Signatures		26

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this annual filing, including, without limitation, statements containing the words "believes", "anticipates", "expects" and words of similar import, constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Such factors include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions: demographic changes; the ability of the Company to sustain, manage or forecast its growth; the ability of the Company to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and other factors referenced in this and previous filings.

Given these uncertainties, readers of this Form 10-K and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.

PART I

Item 1 - Business

General

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. (“Company” or “MMEM”) was incorporated under the ~~laws~~ Laws of the State of Nevada on February 23, 2011~~. The~~ ~~Company was originally incorporated~~ as SW China Imports, Inc. ~~on February 23, 2011 in the State of Nevada.~~ The Company’s initial business plan was to import high-end handmade lace wigs, hairpieces, and other beauty supplies and accessories manufactured overseas into the United States. In June 2014, the Company changed its name to Med-Cannabis Pharma, Inc. and implemented a new business plan to enter into the retail sale of medical and personal use marijuana, where allowable. In October 2015, the Company changed its name to MCPI, Inc. In March 2017, the Company, in anticipation of consummating a proposed asset acquisition transaction, changed its name to Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

~~Effective~~A ~~March~~detailed ~~31,~~discussion ~~2016, the Company ceased activities in all~~ of ~~its subsidiaries and disposed of Med-Pharma Management, Inc. and High Desert MMJ, Inc. Prior thereto,~~ the Company’s ~~subsidiaries~~previous ~~were~~business ~~Medical~~plans ~~Management Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation engaged in providing back-office~~ and ~~support~~activities ~~services~~has tobeen disclosed ~~marijuana dispensaries~~ in ~~the~~predecessor ~~State~~filings ofon ~~Oregon;~~both ~~Med-Pharma~~Form ~~Management, Inc., a Washington State corporation which was formed to own, manage or provide back~~10-~~office~~K and ~~support~~Form ~~services~~10-Q tofiled ~~marijuana dispensaries~~ in ~~Washington~~prior ~~State; and High Desert MMJ, Inc~~periods. an Oregon corporation, which is a 99.0% partner in Emerald Mountain Organics, an Oregon joint venture, formed to facilitate the development and growing of medical marijuana plants for wholesale distribution to licenced dispensaries in the State of Oregon.

AsOn ofNovember ~~December~~28, 312016, ~~2015~~the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of this Agreement, ~~Medical~~the ~~Management~~Company ~~Systems~~issued issue 284,580,000 ~~Inc.~~shares ~~held~~of aits ~~Management~~common ~~Contract~~stock into escrow for ~~three~~the ~~marijuana~~benefit ~~dispensaries~~of ~~located~~Armada inMining, ~~Newport~~Inc., ~~Bend~~an Arizona corporation, and/or ~~Cottage~~its ~~Grove,~~assigns ~~Oregon;~~(Armada) ~~which~~in ~~are~~exchange ~~owned~~for byrights aand ~~company~~interests ~~controlled~~in mining byproperties ain ~~related~~the ~~party~~historic Tombstone Mining District. ~~This~~The ~~Management~~Agreement ~~Contract~~allows ~~was~~for ~~terminated~~the byCompany ~~the~~to ~~consent~~acquire ofrights ~~both~~and ~~parties,~~interests ~~effective~~to ~~March~~approximately 313,800 ~~2016. Med-Pharma~~acres ~~only~~of ~~conducted~~contiguous ~~introductory~~mineral ~~due~~leases, ~~diligence~~including ~~efforts~~some property acquired in ~~the~~fee ~~State~~simple, and ownership of ~~Washington~~100% ~~and~~of Tombstone Development Company, ~~currently~~which was formed in 1933, ~~had~~and ~~abandoned~~is ~~all~~believed ~~activities~~to inbe the ~~State~~oldest ofcontinually ~~Washington~~operating mining company in Arizona. ~~Emerald~~A ~~Mountain~~copy ~~Organics~~of ~~had~~the ~~established~~Agreement was furnished as an ~~early-phase~~exhibit ~~growing~~to ~~operation~~a ~~and generated~~Form ~~nominal~~8-K ~~sales~~filed ~~through~~on ~~September~~or 30about November 28, ~~2015~~2016.

~~During~~This ~~the~~exchange ~~first~~resulted 10in ~~days~~Armada ofowning ~~October~~approximately ~~2015, the Company’s subsidiary, High Desert MMJ, Inc., learned that the 1.0~~85% ~~minority partner in the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture had absconded with all~~ of the ~~assets~~Company, ~~of the joint venture~~post-transaction. ~~Efforts~~ Subject to ~~locate~~financing and ~~recover~~various ~~either~~regulatory approvals, the ~~individuals~~Company ~~representing~~intends ~~said~~to ~~1.0%~~commence ~~minority~~development ~~partner~~of orthese ~~the~~properties ~~said~~by ~~absconded~~processing ~~assets~~previously ~~were~~mined ~~unsuccessful. Accordingly,~~materials ~~effective~~for ~~October 10~~silver, ~~2015,~~as ~~High~~well ~~Desert~~as ~~MMJ,~~precious ~~Inc.~~and ~~abandoned~~base ~~the~~metals; ~~Emerald~~by ~~Mountain~~reopening ~~Organics joint venture~~ and ~~wrote~~developing ~~off~~existing mines ~~its~~using ~~investment. The~~modern ~~cumulative~~equipment ~~start-up~~and ~~losses~~techniques; inand ~~the~~by ~~Company’s~~completing ~~consolidated~~an ~~financial~~existing ~~statements~~drill/test ~~for~~grid ~~the~~to ~~Emerald~~establish ~~Mountain Organics joint venture through~~ the ~~date~~boundary of ~~abandonment~~producible ~~were~~ore ~~approximately $53~~bodies,~~000~~ ~~and~~in ~~the~~anticipation ~~Company~~of ~~recognized~~ a ~~loss~~Bankable onFeasibility ~~the~~Study ~~stolen~~and ~~assets~~further ~~of approximately $51,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2015~~development.

OnThe ~~June~~completion 1,of ~~2016,~~ the ~~Company~~acquisition ~~entered~~of ~~into~~these acurrently ~~Settlement,~~non-performing ~~General~~claims/leases ~~and~~was ~~Mutual~~initially subject ~~Release~~to ofthe ~~Claims~~completion ~~and Assignment~~ of ~~Interest~~due ~~Transfer~~diligence, ~~Agreement~~acquisition ~~(Settlement~~of ~~Agreement)~~adequate ~~with~~financing ~~its majority shareholder~~ and avarious ~~related~~regulatory ~~party~~approvals. ~~The~~On ~~Settlement~~June ~~Agreement~~27, ~~relates~~2017, to the ~~Company’s~~Registrant ~~management~~announced ofthat ~~three~~the ~~medical~~due ~~marijuana~~diligence ~~dispensaries~~process, ~~(Stores)~~although ~~located~~not intotally ~~Oregon~~complete, ~~which~~was ~~are~~sufficient ~~owned~~to byclose ~~Bendor~~the November ~~Investments~~28, ~~Ltd.~~2016 ~~(Bendor), whose sole shareholder is Charles Stidham~~transaction. The ~~Company~~transaction ~~owed~~closed ~~Mr. Stidham approximately $1,100,000, including accrued interest,~~ as ~~of the date of the Settlement Agreement.~~follows:

The Company received from Armada 100% of the issued and outstanding stock in Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at the nominal value of approximately $1,000.

The Company received an assignment from Armada of approximately 45% of a specific group of claims/leases covering approximately 200 contiguous acres, subject to a “wrap” note issued in favor of Armada approximately equal to a note payable to the original lessee of approximately $200,000. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at approximately $400,000, which equals the value of the note payable being assumed and the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

c) The Company ~~asserted~~received aan ~~claim~~assignment ~~for~~from ~~management~~Armada ~~fees~~ of approximately ~~$80,000~~45% ~~and reimbursement~~ of ~~monies~~a ~~advanced~~specific togroup ~~support the operations~~ of ~~the~~claims/leases ~~Stores~~covering ~~totaling~~ approximately ~~$343,000~~700 ~~for~~contiguous ~~the services of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary~~acres, ~~Medical~~subject ~~Management~~to ~~Systems,~~a ~~Inc.~~“wrap” ~~(MMS),~~note issued in ~~managing~~favor ~~the~~of ~~Stores. Bendor~~Armada ~~disputed~~approximately ~~this~~equal ~~claim. To~~to ~~resolve~~a ~~the~~note ~~dispute,~~payable ~~the parties agreed~~ to ~~forgive~~ the ~~accrued~~original ~~management~~lessee ~~fees~~of ~~and to offset the~~ approximately $~~343~~700,000. ~~due~~This ~~from~~piece ~~Bendor~~of ~~against~~ the transaction was recorded at approximately $1,~~100~~400,000, ~~owed~~which toequals ~~Mr. Stidham with~~ the ~~Company~~approximate ~~releasing~~value ~~any~~of ~~and~~the ~~all~~note ~~interests~~being itassumed ~~may have had in the Stores~~ and ~~MMS. Additionally,~~ the ~~Company~~nominal ~~agreed~~intrinsic tovalue ~~assign a trademark to Mr. Stidham as well as executing a new Note in the principal sum~~ of $~~752,694.19. The effect of the June~~ 1,000 ~~2016~~per ~~Settlement Agreement is reflected in the accompanying 2015 consolidated financial statements~~acre.

~~Pending~~NOTE: ~~Transaction~~in both b) and c) - Armada will retain the remaining respective 55% in each specific group of claims/leases, subject to the generation of approximately $500,000 in net earnings from the respective claims AFTER the retirement of all affiliated debt. After the debt is retired and the $500,000 is paid to Armada, the residual 55% will transfer to the Company for no additional consideration.

Ond) ~~November~~The ~~28, 2016, the~~ Company ~~entered~~received ~~into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement) with Armada Mining, Inc. of Tombstone, Arizona,~~ an ~~Arizona~~assignment ~~corporation (Armada). Under the terms~~ of ~~the~~100% ~~Agreement, the Company will issue 284,580,000 shares~~ of its common stock to Armada, its affiliates, related entities and other common parties in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the Tombstone Mining District of Arizona. The Company will acquire rights and interests to approximately ~~3,800~~ten ~~acres~~(10) ofspecific ~~contiguous mineral~~ claims/leases, ~~including some property~~ acquired infrom ~~fee~~the ~~simple,~~Bureau ~~and ownership~~ of ~~100%~~Land ofManagement ~~Tombstone~~by ~~Development~~Jack ~~Company,~~T. ~~which was formed in 1933~~Bauska, ~~and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona~~personally. ~~Subject~~ toThis ~~the~~piece ~~completion~~ of ~~due~~the ~~diligence,~~ acquisition ofwas ~~adequate~~recorded ~~financing~~at ~~and various regulatory approvals,~~ the ~~Company~~nominal ~~intends~~value ~~to commence development~~ of ~~these properties by processing previously mined materials for gold~~$2, ~~silver and other precious or base metals~~000, bywhich ~~reopening~~approximates ~~and~~the ~~developing~~founder’s ~~existing~~cost ~~mines~~related ~~using modern equipment and techniques and by completing an existing drill/test grid~~ to ~~establish~~Mr. ~~the~~Bauska’s ~~boundary~~expenses offor ~~producible~~acquisition ~~ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study~~ and ~~further development~~recording.

~~Upon~~e) ~~completion~~The ofCompany ~~the~~received ~~terms~~an assignment of ~~the~~100% ~~Agreement,~~of ~~Armada~~certain ~~will~~claims/leases ~~own~~covering approximately ~~85%~~278 ofcontiguous ~~the~~acres ~~Company’s post-transaction~~originally ~~issued~~acquired ~~and~~by ~~outstanding~~Jack ~~common stock of the Company~~T. ~~Armada~~ ~~has~~Bauska, ~~represented~~personally; subject to ~~the Company that it anticipates exchanging~~ a ~~portion~~100% assumption of ~~these shares with their existing shareholders; using~~ a ~~portion~~note payable to ~~satisfy~~the ~~existing~~original ~~obligations~~lessee toof ~~related~~approximately ~~parties~~$560,000 and ~~others;~~accrued ~~and~~interest ~~using~~of aapproximately ~~portion to finance other Armada operations~~$60,526. ~~The~~ ~~Agreement~~This ~~anticipates~~piece ~~that~~of ~~Company,~~the ~~post-~~transaction, ~~will~~was ~~have~~valued ~~new~~at ~~Board~~approximately ~~of Directors that will~~$898, ~~in turn~~526, ~~appoint~~which ~~new~~equals ~~management for~~ the ~~Company. Additionally,~~approximate ~~the~~value ~~Company~~of ~~and Armada have facilitated a change in~~ the ~~Company’s~~note ~~corporate~~being ~~name~~received toand ~~better reflect~~ the ~~nature~~nominal ~~and~~intrinsic ~~focus~~value of ~~the~~$1,000 ~~Company’s~~per ~~proposed ongoing and future business interests~~acre.

Asf) The Company received an assignment of 47.5% of certain claims/leases, covering approximately 2,300 contiguous acres, controlled by an affiliate of Armada. At the ~~date~~time the Armada affiliate receives approximately $800,000 in net proceeds from the development of ~~this~~the ~~filing~~affiliated claims, ~~this~~the Armada affiliate will transfer the residual 52.5% to the Registrant for no additional consideration. This piece of the transaction ~~has~~was ~~not~~valued ~~been~~at ~~completed~~the ~~and~~nominal value of approximately $2,300,000, inwhich equals the ~~opinion~~nominal ofintrinsic ~~current~~value ~~management~~of $1,000 ~~remains~~per ~~viable~~acre.

This aggregate transaction has an approximate initial gross asset value of approximately $5,000,526 with the issuance or assumption of underlying debt to initially acquire said claims/leases of approximately $1,460,000.

The “wrap” note issued to Armada is for an aggregate $900,000 and bears interest at 7.0% interest. The “wrap” note was originally due on December 31, 2018, and has been extended to December 31, 2019; it may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

The assumed note is in the principal amount of $560,000 and bears interest at 5.0%. This note originally matured on August 20, 2015, is secured by a Deed of Trust on the underlying claims/leases and no notice of default or demand for payment has been made by the initial borrower. Management is of the opinion that this note is currently in “demand” status and the underlying assets are not at risk for foreclosure.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Management evaluated the carrying value of these assets as of that date and determined that these assets are of limited value unless and until the Company arranges development capital. Accordingly, management has provided an impairment equal to the net recorded acquisition value of these assets as of December 31, 2017.

On February 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (MDA) with L2 Capital, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company (“L2 Capital”). Our MDA has several components: 1) Under the Equity Purchase Agreement (‘Equity Line”), the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell shares of its common stock to L2 Capital at 75% of the prevailing OTC market price, as determined by the public market over time periods set out in the Equity Line, for up to $3,000,000 and 2) Under the Registration Rights Agreement (“Registration Rights”), the Company is obliged to register the offering of shares to be put under the Equity Line with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-1, and certain Blue Sky regulators, so that L2 Capital may, presumably, resell such shares under our Rule 424 Prospectus.

The Registrant paid a 3% capital commitment fee to L2 Capital, by issuing to it a $90,000 8% Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) The Note requires us to repay $45,000, with interest, in six (6) months, and the balance upon the effective date of the referenced Form S-1, or an additional six (6) months, whichever is earlier. Our default would trigger conversion rights in favor of L2 Capital, permitting it to demand issuance of shares at a 30% discount to market sufficient to satisfy any amounts due.

Also included in the MDA are share reserve requirements, under which our transfer agent has agreed to maintain a portion of our authorized but unissued shares sufficient to meet our obligations under the Equity Line and Note.

As of December 31, 2017 and subsequent thereto, the Company is in default on this obligation and the recorded $90,000 has been charged to expense. No demand for either conversion or redemption has been made by L2 Capital.

On November 20, 2017, the Company issued a press release noting it had entered into a letter of intent with Qu Ltd. to provide up to 5 million oz. silver dore to back a new crypto-currency offering. As a result of the initial due diligence activities, management of the Company elected to discontinue this relationship and has no ongoing involvement or commitment to this endeavor.

Where You Can Find Information

The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC in the SEC's Public Reference Section, Room 1580,100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Section by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, which can be found at www.sec.gov or www.freeedgar.com.

Employees

The Company currently has no employees.

Management of the Company expects to use consultants, attorneys and accountants, as necessary, so long as it is seeking and evaluating business opportunities.

The need for additional employees and their availability will be addressed in connection with the decision whether or not to acquire or participate in specific business opportunities.

Item 1A - Risk Factors

We have a limited operating history with our current business. The Company was incorporated in 2011 and was unsuccessful at previous business plans.

Originally, the Company was formed to operate as an importer of high-end handmade lace wigs, hairpieces and related beauty products. The Company’s operations as both a support entity to the legal marijuana business and as a direct retailer, which it has focused on since the third quarter of 2014, generated only limited revenues and was abandoned in early-2016. Future operations are subject to all the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in establishing new businesses. The Company believes that it will become commercially viable, generate significant revenues and operate at a profit in future periods; however, there are no assurances that these projections will occur.

4The Company has no cash flows to support operations and relies on external sources to maintain the corporate entity.

On May 11, 2016, the Company and a former controlling stockholder of the Company completed a restated and restructured Promissory Note agreement dated March 31, 2016. The original balance of the note was for a principal amount of $752,694.19, bearing interest at 10.0% per annum and requiring monthly debt service payments of approximately $15,992.55 commencing June 30, 2016 through June 30, 2017, at which time all remaining principal and accrued interest is due and payable. The note also contains a repayment clause where the principal and accrued interest may be paid in common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.001 per share. For all periods from the inception of the debt through the date of these financial statements, the lender formally suspended the common stock conversion clause contained in the note. On November 30, 2016 and October 22, 2017, the lender notified the Company that the lender was exercising the common stock conversion clause for the repayment of $150 and $24,000 in debt, respectively, and continued the suspension of the conversion clause for the remaining balance of the debt. The continuation of the suspension of the conversion clause remains in effect as of the date of these financial statements and the Company remains delinquent in making the scheduled monthly debt service payments and no action is expected to be taken by the lender. Through December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, the outstanding principal balance on this indebtedness is approximately $797,371 and $820,371. These funds were used to support the Company’s working capital needs in prior periods.

Concurrent with the Armada transaction, the Company engaged the services of an unrelated third-party to provide management services to the Company on a “for fee” month-to-month informal agreement. Included in the services to be provided is a line-of-credit note payable up to the amount of $150,000 with interest at 6.0% per annum. The note matures on December 31, 2017 or when the Company completes a successful capital infusion of at least $500,000 directly related to the commencement of mining operations in and around Tombstone, Arizona. Both parties agreed that additional working capital would be required and, on December 30, 2017, executed a new Line of Credit Note to provide up to $250,000 to the Company at identical terms with a new maturity date of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, approximately $89,838 and $-0- had been advanced against this line-of-credit. This note is delinquent and the lender has made no demand for payment, nor does the Company anticipate such a demand being made.

The Company will require additional financing to become commercially viable.

AsThe ~~December~~Company's ~~31,~~continued ~~2016,~~existence ~~the~~is ~~Company~~dependent ~~had~~upon aits ~~line-of-credit~~ability ~~(”LOC”)~~ to aimplement ~~related~~its ~~party~~business ~~stockholder~~plan, generate ~~with~~sufficient ancash ~~outstanding~~flows ~~balance~~from ofoperations ~~approximately~~to ~~$820,000,~~support ~~bearing~~its ~~interest~~daily atoperations, ~~10%~~and ~~annually.~~provide ~~This~~sufficient ~~LOC~~resources ~~was~~to ~~entered~~retire ~~into~~existing onliabilities ~~June 1, 2016~~ and ~~replaced~~obligations ~~all~~on ~~previous~~a ~~shareholder~~timely ~~notes~~basis. ~~During~~The ~~the~~Company ~~year~~faces ~~ended~~considerable ~~December~~risk ~~31,~~in ~~2016~~its ~~and~~business ~~2015,~~plan ~~interest expense on these financing vehicles was approximately $304,000~~ and ~~$73,000,~~a potential ~~inclusive~~shortfall of ~~non-cash~~funding ~~charges~~due ~~for~~to ~~partial~~our ~~note~~uncertainty ~~conversions~~ to ~~common~~raise ~~stock~~adequate atcapital ~~less~~in ~~than~~the ~~“fair~~equity ~~value”~~securities market.

The Company is dependent upon existing cash balances to support its day-to-day operations. In the event that working capital sufficient to maintain the corporate entity and implement our business plan is not available, the Company’s existing controlling stockholders intend to maintain the corporate status of the Company and provide all necessary working capital support on the Company's behalf. However, no formal commitments or arrangements to advance or loan funds to the Company or repay any such advances or loans exist. There is no legal obligation for either management or existing controlling stockholders to provide additional future funding. Further, the Company is at the mercy of future economic trends and business operations for the Company’s existing controlling stockholders to have the resources available to support the Company.

The Company anticipates offering future sales of equity securities. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding through the sales of additional equity securities or, that such funding, if available, will be obtained on terms favorable to or affordable by the Company.

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 25,000,000 million shares of preferred stock and 500,000,000 shares of common stock. The Company’s ability to issue preferred stock may limit the Company’s ability to obtain debt or equity financing as well as impede the implementation of the Company’s business plan. The Company’s ability to issue these authorized but unissued securities may also negatively impact our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our debt or equity securities.

In such a restricted cash flow scenario, the Company would be unable to complete its business plan steps, and would, instead, delay all cash intensive activities. Without necessary cash flow, the Company may become dormant during the next twelve months, or until such time as necessary funds could be raised in the equity securities market.

While the Company is of the opinion that good faith estimates of the Company’s ability to secure additional capital in the future to reach its goals have been made, there is no guarantee that the Company will receive sufficient funding to sustain operations or implement any future business plan steps.

The Company’s current mining business can be capital intensive.

The Company acknowledges that its Plan of Operations may not result in the consistent generation of positive working capital in the near future. Although management believes that it will be able to successfully execute its business plan, which includes third party financing and the raising of capital to meet the Company’s future liquidity needs, there can be no assurances. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We currently rely on certain key individuals, and the loss of one of these key individuals could have an adverse effect on the Company.

Our success depends to a certain degree upon certain key members of our management. These individuals are a significant factor in our growth and success. The loss of the services of such members of management could have a material adverse effect on our Company. We presently maintain no key-man insurance coverage on any of our officers.

The Company’s success will be dependent in part upon its ability to attract qualified personnel and consultants.

The Company’s success will be dependent in part upon its ability to attract qualified creative marketing, sales and development professionals. The inability to do so on favorable terms may harm the Company’s proposed business.

The Company must effectively meet the challenges of managing expanding operations.

The Company’s business plan anticipates that operations will undergo significant expansion during 2017 and beyond. This expansion will require the Company manage a larger and more complex organization, which could place a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources. Management may not succeed with these efforts. Failure to expand in an efficient manner could cause expenses to be greater than anticipated, revenues to grow more slowly than expected and could otherwise have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business could be affected by changes in governmental regulation.

Federal, State and Local laws and regulations governing mining operations are broad in scope and are subject to evolving interpretations, which could require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance. In addition, violations of these laws, actual or alleged, could disrupt the Company’s planned business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, it is possible that additional or revised Federal, State and Local laws and regulations may be enacted in the future governing the mining industry. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with any such laws and regulations and its failure to do so could significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business will be subject to other operating risks which may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition.

Our planned operations will be subject to risks normally incidental to ~~retail~~mining and ~~manufacturing~~mineral exploration ~~operations~~activities and will be dependent on internal and third-party production and distribution operations which could result in work stoppages, damage to property or unavailable product for resale. This may be caused by:

·	breakdown of equipment;

·	labor disputes;

·	imposition of new government regulations;

·	sabotage by operational personnel;

·	cost overruns; and

·	fire, flood, or other acts of God.

We will likely face significant competition.

The mining industry is subject to significant competition as it implements its business strategy. The ability of MCPI to effectively compete could be hindered by a lack of funds, poor positioning, management error, and other factors. The inability to effectively compete could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR PUBLIC COMPANY STATUS AND OUR COMMON STOCK

Our internal controls may be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial office and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

·	pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or directors of the Company; and

·	provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

We do not have a sufficient number of employees to segregate responsibilities and may be unable to afford increasing our staff or engaging outside consultants or professionals to overcome our lack of employees. During the course of our testing, we may identity other deficiencies that we may not be able to timely remediate. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes Oxley”). Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.

The costs of being a public company could result in us being unable to continue as a going concern.

As a public company, we are required to comply with numerous financial reporting and legal requirements, including those pertaining to audits and internal control. The costs of this compliance could be significant. If our revenues do not increase and/or we cannot satisfy many of these costs through the issuance of our shares, we may be unable to satisfy these costs in the normal course of business that would result in our being unable to continue as a going concern.

Management and the Board of Directors may be Indemnified.

The Certificate or Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of MMEM provide for indemnification of directors and officers at the expense of the respective corporation and limit their liability. This may result in a major cost to the corporation and hurt the interests of stockholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of directors and officers. The Company has been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under Federal Securities Laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

The market for the MMEM Shares is extremely limited and sporadic.

MMEM’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets. The market for MMEM’s common stock is limited and sporadic. Trading in stock quoted on the Pink Sheets is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress or exaggerate the market price of MMEM’s common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the trading of securities in the Pink Sheets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like NASDAQ, or a stock exchange like the New York Stock Exchange.

MMEM’s common stock is a penny stock. Trading of MMEM’s common stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations and FINRA’s sales practice requirements, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our common stock.

MMEM’s common stock is a penny stock. The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. MMEM’s common stock is covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. The term “accredited investor ” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in, and limit the marketability of, MMEM’s common stock.

In addition to the penny stock rules promulgated by the SEC, FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) has adopted rules that require when recommending an investment to a customer, a broker- dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low -priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA’s requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy MMEM’s common stock, which may limit investor ability to buy and sell MMEM’s common stock.

The market for penny stocks has experienced numerous frauds and abuses that could adversely impact MMEM’s common stock.

Company management believes that the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

·	control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to a promoter or issuer;

·	manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;

· boiler room practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by sales persons; excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and

· excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and

·	wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

The board of directors of MMEM has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with terms that may not be beneficial to common stockholders and with the ability to adversely affect common stockholder voting power and rights upon liquidation.

MMEM’s Certificate of Incorporation allows us to issue shares of preferred stock without any vote or further action by our stockholders. Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders of preferred stock the rights to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock.

The ability of our principal stockholders, including our CEO, to control our business may limit or eliminate minority stockholders’ ability to influence corporate affairs.

~~Upon~~As ~~completion~~a result of the Armada transaction, the principal stockholder of MMEM common stock ~~will hold~~ holds 284,580.,000 shares (or approximately 8478.598%) of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. Additionally, a former controlling shareholder holds a convertible Promissory Note with a balance due of approximately $~~881~~941,~~000~~030, including accrued interest, which currently has a conversion clause to common stock which has been indefinitely suspended by the Holder of the Promissory Note. The revocation of this suspension could cause the issuance of an additional ~~881~~941,~~000~~030,000 shares of common stock, which is far in excess of the Company’s currently authorized shares.

Because of the number of shares currently held and the conversion feature on the Promissory Note, these parties are in a position to significantly influence membership of our board of directors as well as all other matters requiring stockholder approval, as well as control the affairs of MMEM and it’s subsidiaries. The interests of our principal stockholders may differ from the interests of other stockholders with respect to the issuance of shares, business transactions with or sales to other companies, selection of other officers and directors and other business decisions. The minority stockholders have no way of overriding decisions made by our principal stockholders. This level of control may also have an adverse impact on the market value of our shares because our principal stockholders may institute or undertake transactions, policies or programs that result in losses and/or may not take any steps to increase our visibility in the financial community and/or may sell sufficient numbers of shares to significantly decrease our price per share.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The Company has never paid cash dividends on their shares of common stock. MMEM does not expect to pay a cash dividends on its common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. The future payment of dividends depends upon future earnings, capital requirements, financial requirements and other factors that the companies’ boards of directors will consider. Since they do not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common stock, return on investment, if any, will depend solely on an increase, if any, in the market value of the common stock.

Future sales of shares of MMEM common stock pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act could adversely affect the market price of MMEM’s common stock.

MMEM currently has approximately 51360,~~720~~300,000 outstanding shares of its common stock which were issued pursuant registration statements and/or exemptions from registration under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, but which are now available for public sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act and comparable exemptions under applicable state securities laws. The potential of such sales could adversely affect the market price of MMEM’s common stock.

Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protection against interested-director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

Sarbanes-Oxley as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the NYSE/AMEX and the NASDAQ Stock Market as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities that are listed on those exchanges or the NASDAQ Stock Market. Because we are not currently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with voluntary compliance, we have not yet adopted these measures.

We do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, directors have the ability, among other things, to determine their own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested- director transactions, conflicts of interest, if any, and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations as a result thereof.

We intend to comply with all corporate governance measures relating to director independence as and when required. However, we may find it very difficult or be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley. The enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.

Item 1B - Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2 - Properties

The Company currently maintains a physical and mailing address at 1137 Highway 80 East, Post Office Box 1218, Tombstone, AZ 86638. The Company’s telephone number there is (520) 457-9404. Other than this mailing address, the Company does not currently maintain any other office facilities, and does not anticipate the need for maintaining office facilities at any time in the foreseeable future. The Company pays no rent or other fees for the use of the mailing address as this address is virtually full-time by other businesses related to the Company’s majority stockholder.

It is likely that the Company will not establish an office until it has completed a business acquisition transaction, but it is not possible to predict what arrangements will actually be made with respect to future office facilities.

Item 3 - Legal Proceedings

The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are known to be contemplated.

Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures

As of the date of this filing, the Company has not completed the Armada transaction, as previously discussed. Accordingly, The Company has no reportable events as defined in Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Act and ~~does~~doesnot ~~not~~ anticipate nor is aware of any reportable events currently existing or to exist within the Armada transaction.

PART II

Item 5 - Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market for Trading and Eligibility for Future Sale

Our common stock started trading on September 11, 2012. Our current trading symbol is “MCPI”. Currently there is only a limited, sporadic, and volatile market for our stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on www.bigcharts.com for the periods indicated. These prices represent prices between inter-dealer prices, do not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.

	High		Low
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
Quarter ended December 31, 2017	$	0.062	$	0.035
Quarter ended September 30, 2017	$	0.115	$	0.034
Quarter ended June 30, 2017	$	0.11	$	0.07
Quarter ended March 31, 2017	$	0.28	$	0.115
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
Quarter ended December 31, 2016	$	0.25	$	0.03
Quarter ended September 30, 2016	$	0.08	$	0.02
Quarter ended June 30, 2016	$	0.18	$	0.04
Quarter ended March 30, 2016	$	0.19	$	0.07
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
Quarter ended December 31, 2015	$	0.30	$	0.25
Quarter ended September 30, 2015	$	0.40	$	0.27
Quarter ended June 30, 2015	$	0.40	$	0.17
Quarter ended March 31, 2015	$	0.23	$	0.04
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
Quarter ended December 31, 2014	$	0.30	$	0.24
Quarter ended September 30, 2014	$	0.80	$	0.14
Quarter ended June 30, 2014	$	0.12	$	0.02
Quarter ended March 31, 2014	$	0.02	$	0.001

The closing price of our common stock on ~~April~~July 131, ~~2017~~2019 was $0.~~0625~~03 as reported by the OTCQB Bulletin Board.

Holders of Record

As of ~~April~~June 1020, ~~2017~~2018, we had 51360,~~720~~300,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding held by approximately 7580 stockholders of record, exclusive of shares held in street name. We had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Transfer Agent

Our independent stock transfer agent is VStock Transfer LLC. Their address is 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598. Their phone number is (212) 828-8436.

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On March 27, 2014, the then-controlling shareholders of the Company sold 210,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of the Company to Big Sky Oil, Inc. and another investor in a private transaction, effecting a change in control of the Company.

On July 28, 2014, Big Sky Oil, Inc., the majority shareholder of the Company, as a result of the March 2014 change in control transaction, surrendered for no compensation and returned to the Company’s treasury 159,930,000 shares of the Company’s common stock it had acquired in the March 2014 transaction. Big Sky agreed to return these shares to the treasury for use in future possible issuances by the Company.

On November 14, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 100,000 shares for consulting services rendered in conjunction with due diligence related to providing back-office and other support services to marijuana dispensaries located in both Oregon and Washington State. These shares were valued at $30,000 using the closing price on the date the shares were issued.

On January 15, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares for consulting services related to the provision of back-office and other management support services to marijuana dispensaries located in the State of Oregon. This stock was valued at $0.30 per share, which approximated the closing price on date of the issuance.

During the period ended March 31, 2015, South Beach Live, Inc., a corporation controlled by a majority shareholder of the Company, transferred 1,000,000 shares of its holdings in the Company’s common stock to consultants for ongoing services associated with marketing strategies. South Beach Live, Inc. is a related party and does not expect to be repaid for this transaction which was valued at approximately $300,000 and recorded as professional fees and contributed capital on the books of the Company.

On November 30, 2016, Charles Stidham notified the Company that he was withdrawing his suspension of the conversion clause in his March 31, 2016 Promissory Note only for the conversion of $150 in outstanding principal and, concurrently, reinstating the suspension of the conversion clause for all remaining outstanding principal. This limited one-time conversion caused the issuance 0f 1,500,000 shares of common stock with a “fair value” of $217,350 resulting in a non-cash charge to operations of approximately $217,200, which is reflected as a component of interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the Company had 336,300,000 and 50,220,000 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding.

On February 29, 2016, the Company filed a Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission noting a pending 1 for 10 reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock; as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, and a concurrent amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation setting the authorized capital of the Company from the authorized, as adjusted, 25,000,000 post-split shares of common stock to 500,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock and the authorized, as adjusted, 250,000 post-split shares of preferred stock to 25,000,000 shares of $0001 par value preferred stock. The time to implement the reverse split action has expired and no further action is anticipated by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue additional shares of common stock not to exceed the amount authorized by the Articles of Incorporation, on such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board may deem appropriate without further stockholder action.

In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, all shares of our common stock are entitled to share equally in our assets available for distribution to stockholders. However, the rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of our common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of preferred stock that our Board of Directors may decide to issue in the future.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.

As of ~~December~~June 3120, ~~2016~~2018, the Company had no shares of its preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends. We currently intend to retain all future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our directors.

Share Purchase Warrants

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any warrants to purchase shares of our stock.

Options

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any options to purchase shares of our stock.

Convertible Securities

We have not issued and do not have outstanding any securities convertible into shares of our stock or any rights convertible or exchangeable into shares of our stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2016, we have not adopted an equity compensation plan and have not granted any stock options.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Set forth below is information regarding the issuance and sales of securities without registration since January 1, ~~2012~~2017 through December 31, 2016:

On ~~April~~November 3028, ~~2013~~2016, ~~nine~~the ~~shareholders~~Company ~~returned~~entered tointo ~~the~~a ~~Company~~Material anDefinitive ~~aggregate~~Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of ~~300~~this Agreement,~~000~~ the Company issued issue 284,580,000 shares of ~~our~~its ~~restricted~~ common stock into escrow for the benefit of Armada Mining, $0Inc.~~0001~~, ~~par~~an ~~value~~Arizona corporation, ~~which~~and/or ~~were~~its ~~subsequently~~assigns ~~cancelled~~(Armada) byin ~~our~~exchange ~~Board~~for rights and interests in mining properties in the historic Tombstone Mining District. The Agreement allows for the Company to acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of ~~Directors~~contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. ~~These~~A ~~shares~~copy ~~were~~of ~~returned~~the Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to ~~our~~a ~~corporate~~Form ~~treasury~~8-K filed on or about November 28, 2016. This exchange resulted in Armada owning approximately 85% of the Company, post-transaction.

On ~~July~~November 1130, ~~2013~~2016, weCharles ~~issued~~Stidham ~~10,000,000~~notified ~~shares~~the ofCompany ~~common~~that ~~stock~~he towas ~~Taurus~~withdrawing ~~Financial~~his suspension ~~Partners, LLC in consideration~~ of ~~its~~the ~~services~~conversion ofclause ~~assisting~~in ushis ~~with~~March ~~our~~31, ~~continued~~2016 ~~SEC~~Promissory ~~and~~Note ~~EDGAR~~only ~~filing~~for ~~requirements. We~~the ~~valued~~conversion ~~these~~of ~~services at~~ $~~26,000,~~150 orin ~~$0.0026~~outstanding aprincipal ~~share,~~and ~~which~~continuing ~~was~~ the ~~closing~~suspension ~~price~~ of ~~our common stock as quoted on~~ the ~~OTC~~conversion ~~Bulletin~~clause ~~Board~~for onall ~~the~~remaining ~~same~~outstanding ~~day~~principal. InThis ~~connection~~limited onetime ~~with~~conversion ~~this~~caused ~~issuance, we relied upon~~ the ~~exemption~~issuance ~~from~~0f ~~the~~1,500,000 ~~registration~~shares ~~requirements pursuant to the provisions~~ of ~~Section~~common ~~4(2)~~stock ofwith ~~the Securities Act as~~ a ~~transaction~~“fair byvalue” ~~an issuer not involving any public offering. By virtue~~ of ~~its relationship to us~~$217,350 ~~Taurus~~resulting ~~Financial~~in ~~Partners~~a ~~had~~non-cash ~~access~~charge to ~~all~~operations ~~relevant~~of ~~information~~approximately ~~relating~~$217,200, towhich ~~our~~is ~~business~~reflected ~~and~~as ~~represented~~a ~~that~~component itof ~~had~~interest ~~the~~expense ~~required~~in ~~investment intent. In addition,~~ the accompanying ~~securities~~financial ~~issued bore an appropriate restrictive legend~~statements.

On ~~March~~February 2722, ~~2014~~2017, the ~~then-controlling~~Company ~~shareholders~~entered ofinto ~~Mansfield-Martin~~a ~~Exploration~~Material ~~Mining~~Definitive Agreement (MDA) with L2 Capital, ~~Inc~~LLC, a Kansas limited liability company (“L2 Capital”). Our MDA has several components: 1) Under the Equity Purchase Agreement (~~formerly~~‘Equity ~~either~~Line”), ~~MCPI~~the Company has the right, ~~Inc;~~but ~~Med-Cannabis~~not ~~Pharma~~the obligation, ~~Inc.;~~to orsell SWshares ~~China~~of its common stock to L2 Capital at 75% of the prevailing OTC market price, ~~Inc.)~~as ~~sold~~determined ~~210~~by the public market over time periods set out in the Equity Line, for up to $3,000,000 ofand ~~their~~2) Under the Registration Rights Agreement (“Registration Rights”), the Company is obliged to register the offering of shares to ~~Big~~be put under the Equity Line with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-1, and certain Blue Sky ~~Oil~~regulators, ~~Inc.~~so ~~and~~that ~~another~~L2 ~~investor~~Capital may, ~~resulting~~presumably, inresell asuch ~~change~~shares ofunder ~~control~~our Rule 424 Prospectus.

OnThe ~~July~~Company ~~28,~~paid ~~2014,~~a ~~Big~~3% ~~Sky~~capital ~~Oil,~~commitment ~~Inc.,~~fee ~~the~~to ~~majority~~L2 ~~shareholder~~Capital, ofby ~~Mansfield-Martin~~issuing ~~Exploration~~to ~~Mining~~it a $90,000 ~~Inc.~~8% Convertible Promissory Note (~~formerly~~“Note”) The ~~MCPI,~~Note ~~Inc.;~~requires ~~Med-Cannabis~~us ~~Pharma~~to ~~Inc.;~~repay or$45,000, SWwith ~~China~~interest, ~~Inc.)~~in ~~voluntarily~~six ~~returned~~(6) ~~159~~months,~~930,000~~ ~~shares~~and the balance upon the effective date of the ~~Company’s~~referenced ~~common~~Form ~~stock~~S-1, itor ~~had~~an ~~purchased~~additional ~~from~~six ~~prior~~(6) ~~management~~months, whichever is earlier. ~~These~~Our ~~shares~~default would ~~were~~trigger ~~returned~~conversion rights in favor of L2 Capital, permitting it to ~~the~~demand ~~treasury~~issuance ~~for~~of ~~use~~shares inat ~~future~~a ~~possible~~30% ~~issuances~~discount byto ~~the~~market ~~Company~~sufficient to satisfy any amounts due.

On November 14, 2014, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to Carla Wienert for services in conjunction with on-site store management. The Company relied on exemptions from registration pursuant to Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.12

11Also included in the MDA are share reserve requirements, under which our transfer agent has agreed to maintain a portion of our authorized but unissued shares sufficient to meet our obligations under the Equity Line and Note.

On ~~November~~October 3022, ~~2016~~2017, Charles Stidham notified the Company that he was withdrawing his suspension of the conversion clause in his March 31, 2016 Promissory Note only for the conversion of $~~150~~24,000 in outstanding principal and continuing the suspension of the conversion clause for all remaining outstanding principal. This limited one-time conversion caused the issuance 0f 124,~~500~~000,000 shares of common stock with a “fair value” of $~~217~~840,~~350~~000 resulting in a non-cash charge to operations of approximately $~~217~~816,~~200~~000, which is reflected as a component of interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

During each month within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, neither we nor any “affiliated purchaser”, as that term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, repurchased any of our common stock or other securities.

Item 6 - Selected Financial Data

Not applicable

Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (1) Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

(1) Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

(2) General

The Company was originally incorporated as SW China Imports, Inc. on February 23, 2011 in the State of Nevada. The Company’s ~~initial~~previous business ~~plan~~plans ~~was~~and toattempted ~~import~~operations ~~high-end~~have ~~handmade~~been ~~lace~~disclosed ~~wigs,~~in ~~hairpieces,~~previously ~~and~~filed ~~other~~documents ~~beauty~~on ~~supplies~~Form 10-K and/or ~~accessories~~Form ~~manufactured overseas into the United States~~10-Q.

In June 2014, the Company changed its name to Med-Cannabis Pharma, Inc. and implemented a new business plan to enter into the retail sale of medical and personal use marijuana, where allowable. In October 2015, the Company changed its name to MCPI, Inc.

Effective March 31, 2016, the Company ceased activities in all of its subsidiaries and disposed of Med-Pharma Management, Inc. and High Desert MMJ, Inc. Prior thereto, the Company’s subsidiaries were Medical Management Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation engaged in providing back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries in the State of Oregon; Med-Pharma Management, Inc., a Washington State corporation which was formed to own, manage or provide back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries in Washington State; and High Desert MMJ, Inc. an Oregon corporation, which is a 99.0% partner in Emerald Mountain Organics, an Oregon joint venture, formed to facilitate the development and growing of medical marijuana plants for wholesale distribution to licenced dispensaries in the State of Oregon.

As of September 30, 2015, Medical Management Systems, Inc. held a Management Contract for three marijuana dispensaries located in Newport, Bend, and Cottage Grove, Oregon, which are owned by a company controlled by a related party. This Management Contract was terminated by the consent of both parties, effective March 31, 2016. Med-Pharma only conducted introductory due diligence efforts in the State of Washington and, currently, has abandoned all activities in the State of Washington. Emerald Mountain Organics had, as of September 30,2015, established an early-phase growing operation and has generated nominal sales.

During the first 10 days of October 2015, the Company’s subsidiary, High Desert MMJ, Inc., learned that the 1.0% minority partner in the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture had absconded with all of the assets of the joint venture. Efforts to locate and recover either the individuals representing said 1.0% minority partner or the said absconded assets were unsuccessful. Accordingly, effective October 10, 2015, High Desert MMJ, Inc. abandoned the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture and wrote off its investment. The cumulative start-up losses in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture, through the date of abandonment were approximately $53,000 and the Company recognized a loss on the stolen assets of approximately $51,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Settlement, General and Mutual Release of Claims and Assignment of Interest Transfer Agreement (Settlement Agreement) with its majority shareholder and a related party. The Settlement Agreement relates to the Company’s management of three medical marijuana dispensaries (Stores) located in Oregon, which are owned by Bendor Investments, Ltd. (Bendor), whose sole shareholder is Charles Stidham. The Company owed Mr. Stidham approximately $1,100,000, including accrued interest, as of the date of the Settlement Agreement.

The Company asserted a claim for management fees of approximately $80,000 and reimbursement of approximately $343,000 for the services of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Medical Management Systems, Inc. (MMS), in managing the Stores. Bendor disputed this claim. To resolve the dispute, the parties agreed to forgive the accrued management fees and to offset the approximately $343,000 due from Bendor against the approximately $1,100,000 owed to Mr. Stidham with the Company releasing any and all interests it may have had in the Stores and MMS. Additionally, the Company agreed to assign a trademark to Mr. Stidham as well as executing a new Note in the principal sum of $752,694.19. The effect of the June 1, 2016 Settlement Agreement , due to the timing of this release of these amended financial statements and this transaction, is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the Company, in anticipation of consummating a proposed asset acquisition transaction, changed its name to Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

~~Pending~~On ~~Transaction~~November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of this Agreement, the Company issued issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock into escrow for the benefit of Armada Mining, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and/or its assigns (Armada) in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the historic Tombstone Mining District. The Agreement allows for the Company to acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. A copy of the Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on or about November 28, 2016.

OnThis November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement) with Armada Mining, Inc. of Tombstone, Arizona, an Arizona corporation (Armada). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock to Armada, its affiliates, related entities and other common parties in exchange ~~for~~resulted ~~rights and interests~~ in ~~mining~~Armada ~~properties~~owning ~~in the Tombstone Mining District of Arizona. The Company will acquire rights and interests to~~ approximately ~~3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100~~85% of ~~Tombstone~~the ~~Development~~ Company, ~~which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona~~post-transaction. Subject to ~~the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate~~ financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals,; by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques; and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development.

Upon completion of the terms of the Agreement, Armada will own approximately 85% of the Company’s post-transaction issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Armada has represented to the Company that it anticipates exchanging a portion of these shares with its existing shareholders; using a portion to satisfy existing obligations to related parties and others; and using a portion to finance other Armada operations. The Agreement anticipates that Company, post-transaction, will have new Board of Directors that will, in turn, appoint new management for the Company. Additionally, the Company and Armada have facilitated a change in the Company’s corporate name to better reflect the nature and focus of the Company’s proposed ongoing and future business interests.

As of the date of this filing, this transaction has not been completed and, in the opinion of current management, remains viable.

(3) Results of Operations

The Company has no recognized revenues for either Calendar 2016 or 2015.

In 2015 and 2014, the Company, pursuant to a Management Agreement, has recorded deferred revenues of approximately $65,000 and $5,000, respectively, for management fees receivable from a related party owner of three (3) marijuana dispensaries located in the State of Oregon. These accrued management fees were forgiven pursuant to the June 1, 2016 Settlement Agreement previously discussed.

InThe ~~conjunction~~completion ~~with~~of the ~~Company’s~~acquisition ~~business~~of ~~plan,~~these ascurrently ~~discussed~~non-performing inclaims/leases ~~Item~~was Iinitially subject ofto ~~this document,~~ the ~~Company~~completion ~~has~~of ~~expended~~due ~~considerable~~diligence, ~~effort~~acquisition ~~and~~of ~~financial~~adequate ~~resources~~financing toand ~~the~~various ~~implementation~~regulatory ~~of its business plan~~approvals. ~~The~~On ~~Company~~June ~~has~~27, ~~incurred~~2017, ~~operating~~the ~~expenses~~Registrant ~~requiring~~announced ~~cash~~that ~~payments~~the ofdue ~~approximately~~diligence ~~$86~~process,~~000~~ ~~and~~although ~~$298,000,~~not ~~which~~totally ~~were~~complete, ~~funded~~was ~~through~~sufficient ato ~~line-of-credit~~close ~~with~~the November an28, ~~entity~~2016 ~~affiliated~~transaction. The ~~with~~transaction ~~the~~closed ~~Company’s~~as ~~controlling stockholder.~~follows:

~~Earnings (Loss~~a) ~~per~~The ~~share~~Company ~~for~~received from Armada 100% of the ~~respective~~issued ~~years~~and ~~ended~~outstanding ~~December~~stock 31in Tombstone Development Company, ~~2016~~which ~~and~~was ~~2015~~formed ~~were~~in ~~$(0.01)~~1933, ~~and~~is ~~$(0.01)~~believed ~~based~~to onbe the ~~weighted-average~~oldest ~~shares~~continually ~~issued~~operating ~~and~~mining ~~outstanding~~company in Arizona. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at the ~~end~~nominal value of ~~each~~approximately ~~respective period~~$1,000.

The Company received an assignment from Armada of approximately 45% of a specific group of claims/leases covering approximately 700 contiguous acres, subject to a “wrap” note issued in favor of Armada approximately equal to a note payable to the original lessee of approximately $700,000. This piece of the transaction was recorded at approximately $1,400,000, which equals the approximate value of the note being assumed and the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

NOTE: in both b) and c) - Armada will retain the remaining respective 55% in each specific group of claims/leases, subject to the generation of approximately $500,000 in net earnings from the respective claims AFTER the retirement of all affiliated debt. After the debt is retired and the $500,000 is paid to Armada, the residual 55% will transfer to the Company for no additional consideration.

The Company received an assignment of 100% of approximately ten (10) specific claims/leases acquired from the Bureau of Land Management by Jack T. Bauska, personally. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at the nominal value of $2,000, which approximates the founder’s cost related to Mr. Bauska’s expenses for acquisition and recording.

The Company received an assignment of 100% of certain claims/leases covering approximately 278 contiguous acres originally acquired by Jack T. Bauska, personally; subject to a 100% assumption of a note payable to the original lessee of approximately $560,000 and accrued interest of approximately $60,526. This piece of the transaction was valued at approximately $898,526, which equals the approximate value of the note being received and the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

The Company received an assignment of 47.5% of certain claims/leases, covering approximately 2,300 contiguous acres, controlled by an affiliate of Armada. At the time the Armada affiliate receives approximately $800,000 in net proceeds from the development of the affiliated claims, the Armada affiliate will transfer the residual 52.5% to the Registrant for no additional consideration. This piece of the transaction was valued at the nominal value of approximately $2,300,000, which equals the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

The “wrap” note issued to Armada is for an aggregate $900,000 and bears interest at 7.0% interest. The “wrap” note is due on December 31, 2018 and may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Management evaluated the carrying value of these assets as of that date and determined that given the absence of development capital there is limited value to these assets. Accordingly, management has provided an impairment equal to the net recorded acquisition value of these assets as of December 31, 2017.

(3) Results of Operations

The Company has no recognized revenues for either Calendar 2017 or 2016.

In conjunction with the Company’s business plan, as discussed in Item I of this document, the Company has expended considerable effort and financial resources to the implementation of its business plan. The Company has incurred operating expenses requiring cash payments of approximately $82,000 and $86,000, which was principally funded through a line-of-credit as disclosed in the accompanying financial statement footnotes.

Earnings (Loss) per share for the respective years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $(0.02) and $(0.01) based on the weighted-average shares issued and outstanding at the end of each respective period.

It is anticipated that future expenditure levels will remain relatively consistent until such time that the Company fully implements its current business plan, at which time, the Company’s expenses and working capital requirements may increase significantly.

The Company does not expect to generate any meaningful revenue or incur operating expenses for purposes other than fulfilling the obligations of a reporting company under the Exchange Act unless and until such time that the Company begins meaningful operations.

(4) Plan of Business

On November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement) with Armada Mining, Inc. of Tombstone, Arizona, an Arizona corporation (Armada). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock to Armada, its affiliates, related entities and other common parties in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the Tombstone Mining District of Arizona. The Company will acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. Subject to ~~the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate~~ financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of ~~these~~various ~~properties~~mining leases by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals,; by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques; and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to successfully implement this business plan or that if implemented, said plan will be successful.

Upon completion of the terms of the Agreement, Armada will own approximately 85% of the Company’s post-transaction issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Armada has represented to the Company that it anticipates exchanging a portion of these shares with their existing shareholders; using a portion to satisfy existing obligations to related parties and others; and using a portion to finance other Armada operations. The Agreement anticipates that Company, post-transaction, will have new Board of Directors that will, in turn, appoint new management for the Company. Additionally, the Company and Armada have facilitated a change in the Company’s corporate name to better reflect the nature and focus of the Company’s proposed ongoing and future business interests.

As of the date of this filing, this transaction has not been completed and, in the opinion of current management, remains viable.

(5) Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, the Company had working capital of approximately $(~~953~~2,795,000) and $(~~770~~953,000); inclusive of all related party accounts receivable, accrued expenses and line-of-credit notes payable.

It is the belief of management and significant stockholders that they will provide sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. However, there is no legal obligation for either management or significant stockholders to provide additional future funding. Further, the Company is at the mercy of future economic trends and business operations for the Company’s majority stockholder to have the resources available to support the Company. Should this pledge to provide continuing financing not be fulfilled, the Company has not identified any alternative sources. Consequently, there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

~~The~~Concurrent with the November 2016 proposed transaction with Armada, the Company's ~~need~~engaged the services of an unrelated third-party to provide management services to the Company on a “for ~~working~~fee” ~~capital~~month-to-month ~~may~~informal ~~change~~agreement. Included ~~dramatically~~in asthe services to be provided is a ~~result~~line-of-credit note payable up to the amount of ~~any~~$150,000 ~~future~~with interest ~~business~~at ~~transaction~~6.0% per annum. ~~There~~The ~~can~~note beoriginally nomatured ~~assurance~~on ~~that~~December 31, 2017 or when the Company ~~will~~completes ~~identify~~a ~~and/or~~successful ~~enter~~capital ~~into~~infusion ~~any~~of ~~business~~at ~~transaction~~least in$500,000 directly related to the ~~future. Further,~~commencement ~~there~~of ~~can~~mining beoperations noin ~~assurance~~and around Tombstone, Arizona. Both parties agreed that ~~the~~additional ~~Company~~working capital would be ~~successful~~required inand, ~~consummating~~on ~~any~~December ~~acquisition~~30, on2017, ~~favorable~~executed ~~terms~~a ornew ~~that~~Line itof ~~will~~Credit beNote ~~able~~to provide up to ~~profitably~~$250,000 ~~manage~~to the ~~business~~Company at identical terms with a new maturity date of December 31, 2018. As ~~product~~of December 31, ~~technology~~2017 orand ~~company~~2016, itrespectively, ~~acquires~~approximately $89,838 and $-0- had been advanced against this line-of-credit.

14The Company's need for working capital may change dramatically as a result of any future business transaction.

There can be no assurance that the Company will identify and/or enter into any business transaction in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in consummating any acquisition on favorable terms or that it will be able to profitably manage the business, product, technology or company it acquires.

The Company has no current plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale or issuance of additional securities prior to the location of a potential business transaction. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available to the Company to allow it to cover the expenses related to such activities.

Regardless of whether the Company’s cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet the Company’s operational needs, the Company might seek to compensate providers of services by issuances of stock in lieu of cash.

(6) Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note D of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The required financial statements begin on page F-1 of this document.

Item 9 - Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On July 3, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company dismissed its independent registered public accounting firm, M&K CPAS, PLLC (“M&K”).

The reports of M&K on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles except as to a going concern qualification. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the subsequent interim period through July 2, 2015, there were no (i) “disagreements” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) with M&K on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to M&K’s satisfaction, would have caused M&K to make reference to the subject matter thereof in its reports for such fiscal years and interim period, or (ii) “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Company provided M&K with a copy of the disclosures made in a Current Report on Form 8-K and requested that M&K furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it agrees with the Company’s statements herein and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. A copy of the letter furnished by M&K was filed in said Form 8-K.

On July 3, 2015, the Company engaged Bongiovanni & Associates, PA (Bongiovanni) as its new independent certified public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the subsequent interim period through July 2, 2015, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with Bongiovanni regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Bongiovanni concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or a “reportable event” (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

During the 2^nd quarter of Calendar 2016, the Company was informed that its auditors, Bongiovanni & Associates, PA had changed its name to L&L CPA’s, PA, effective December 31, 2015.

On April 12, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company, as a result of a pending change in control and change in officers and directors, elected to dismiss its independent registered public accounting firm, L&L CPA’s PA (L&L) of Cornelius NC. The reports of L&L on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles except as to a going concern qualification. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the subsequent interim period through April 12, 2017, there were no (i) “disagreements” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S- K) with L&L on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to L&L’s satisfaction, would have caused L&L to make reference to the subject matter thereof in its reports for such fiscal years and interim period, or (ii) “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S- K.

The Company provided L&L with a copy of the disclosures made in a Current Report on Form 8-K and requested that L&L furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it agrees with the Company’s statements herein and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. A copy of the letter furnished by L&L was filed in said Form 8-K.

On April 12, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors elected to engage David S. Friedkin, CPA of River Vale, NJ (Friedkin) as its new independent certified public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the subsequent interim period through April 12, 2017, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with Friedkin regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Friedkin concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S- K) or a “reportable event” (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S- K).

On June 27, 2018, the Board of Directors of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. (MMEM or Company) was notified indirectly through a consultant that the independent registered accounting firm of David S. Friedkin, CPA of River Vale, NJ (Friedkin) would no longer serve as the Company’s auditor. The auditor’s report of Friedkin on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except as to a going concern qualification. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the subsequent interim period through June 27, 2018, there were no (i) “disagreements” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S K) with Friedkin on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to Friedkin’s satisfaction, would have caused Friedkin to make reference to the subject matter thereof in its reports for such fiscal years and interim period, or (ii) “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S K.

On August 14, 2018, the Board of Directors of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. (MMEM or Company) approved the engagement of BF Borgers CPA PC CPA PC (Borgers) of Lakewood, Colorado as the Company’s new independent registered accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016, and the subsequent interim period through August 14, 2018, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with Borgers regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Borgers concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S K) or a “reportable event” (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S K).

Item 9A - Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer (Certifying Officers), have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15 promulgated under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Certifying Officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officers concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC due to a weakness in our controls described below. However, our Certifying Officers believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the respective periods presented.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act.

Internal control over financial reporting is defined under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitation, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.

Management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting is as of the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 has determined that we have a business plans with significant risk, no operations, revenues or employees. Because we have only ~~two~~one executive operating ~~officers~~officer, the Company's internal controls are deficient for the following reasons, (1) there are limited entity level controls due to our limited personnel, (2) there are no segregation of duties as that same person approves, enters, and pays the Company's bills, and (3) there is no separate audit committee. As a result, the Company's internal controls have an inherent weakness which may increase the risks of errors in financial reporting under current operations and accordingly are deficient as evaluated against the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding our internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to the current appropriate Laws and Regulations.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting which internal controls will remain deficient until such time as the Company grows to a point to justify a larger staff and a more complex system of controls and procedures.

Item 9B - Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10 - Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

~~The~~Effective on or about November 28, 2016, the directors and executive officers serving the ~~Company~~Registrant are as follows:

Name	Age	Position Held and Tenure
John T. Bauska	6667	President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, since November 2016
		Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director,
Dan M. Leatzow	41	Director, since November 2016
		since November 2016
Thomas P. McGovern	67	Director, since February 2017
Dan M. Leatzow	40	Director, since November 2016
Robert J. Lloyd	69	Director, since February 2017
Dr. Ted Topolski	73	Director, since August 2017

Our directors serve for a term beginning with election and ending with resignation, removal by the stockholders, or election of a successor by the stockholders. Executive officers serve by appointment at the discretion of the board of directors.

17John T. Bauska - Mr. Bauska has over 40 years of experience in road building and earthmoving, and over 30 years of experience in precious metals mining in Montana and Arizona. He has been involved in mining projects in the Tombstone Mining District for nearly 20 years, including as Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions at Tombstone Exploration & Mining Corp. (TMBXF). Mr. Bauska is currently an officer and director of Trelis Corporation, a private Montana corporation with mineral leases and seasonal mining operations in the Bannack Mining District in Montana; a manager of Henry & Munro, LLC, a private company that provides venture capital to small companies, predominantly in extractive industries, in Montana; a director of Ionic Water Technologies, Inc., a private technology company that has developed waste water treatment equipment for the mining industry; a director of Bio-2, Inc., a private company that has developed a biological water enhancement device; and the owner and manager of Morning View Arabians, LLC, a private company that breeds and deals in registered Arabian horses. Mr. Bauska attended the University of Montana-Western from 1968 to 1970.

John T. Bauska - Mr. Bauska has over 40 years of experience in roadbuilding and earthmoving, and over 30 years of experience in precious metals mining in Montana and Arizona. He has been involved in mining projects in the Tombstone Mining District for nearly 20 years, including as Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions at Tombstone Exploration & Mining Corp. (TMBXF). Mr. Bauska is currently an officer and director of Trelis Corporation, a private Montana corporation with mineral leases and seasonal mining operations in the Bannack Mining District in Montana; a manager of Henry & Munro, LLC, a private company that provides venture capital to small companies, predominantly in extractive industries, in Montana; a director of Ionic Water Technologies, Inc., a private technology company that has developed waste water treatment equipment for the mining industry; a director of Bio-2, Inc., a private company that has developed a a biological water enhancement device; and the owner and manager of Morning View Arabians, LLC, a private company that breeds and deals in registered Arabian horses. Mr. Bauska attended the University of Montana-Western from 1968 to 1970.18

Dan M. Leatzow - Dr. Leatzow has over 25 years of experience in extractive industries – both oil and gas drilling and hard rock mining--, predominantly in waste water treatment and remediation. Dr. Leatzow is currently on staff at Flathead Valley Community College as a Specialist in Advanced Manufacturing, and is an Entrepreneur in Residence at Washington State University. Dr. Leatzow was a founder of Synergetix, Inc., a private company that provides engineering outsourcing for water quality monitoring and purification; he is currently a consultant to Synergetix. Dr. Leatzow is President and CEO of pHoretic Technologies, Inc., a start-up formed to develop diagnostic and testing equipment from technology innovated by Washington State University. Prior to 2013, Dr. Leatzow was the senior engineer for a series of companies providing permitting and engineering services relating to industrial waste water treatment and remediation plans for oil and gas development and mining projects. Dr. Leatzow holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Washington State University, conferred in 1998, and B.S. degrees in Chemical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering Sciences from the University of Colorado – Boulder, both conferred in 1994.

Thomas P. McGovern, PE, RLS, LEED, AP, ENV SP -- Mr. McGovern, 66, Tuscon, AZ, has more than 40 years of experience in the design and management of civil engineering and surveying projects for both public and private sector clients, with experience in the design and management of major roadways under local, state, and federal-aid criteria, as well as citizen participation programs under federal-aid/EIS requirements, as well as Tucson's and Pima County's roadway development processes. His background also includes flood control projects, hydraulic and fluvial studies, bank protection design, and FEMA Flood Insurance Studies. Mr. McGovern graduated from the University of Arizona in 1973, with a B.S. (with distinction) in Civil Engineering. He is currently a Vice-President and Regional Manager for Psomas, Inc., a survey/engineering firm in Tuscon, AZ, where he has worked for 28 years. Among other civic posts, Mr. McGovern has served as President of the American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona; a board member of the Southern Arizona Leadership Council; and a member of the Arizona Association for Economic Development.

Robert J. Lloyd, Esq., LLM -- Mr. Lloyd, 68, Tuscon, AZ, was CEO and corporate legal counsel of Brazilian Resources, Inc., and chief legal counsel and secretary of Jaguar Mining Inc., an operating subsidiary of Brazilian organized as a Canadian corporation, from 2006 to 2014. He currently serves as a director for Brazilian. Brazilian was a resources conglomerate, with interests in food production and processing as well as extractive industries. Jaguar owns and operates gold mining concessions in Brazil. During Mr. Lloyd’s tenure, Jaguar was listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and, in 2009, became dual listed on the NYSE, with a peak market capitalization of over $1.5b. Mr. Lloyd was primarily responsible for Brazilian’s and Jaguar’s capital offerings and regulatory compliance, including the coordination of cross-border reporting obligations necessary for dual listings on Canadian and U.S. exchanges. Mr. Lloyd most recently served as the Executive Vice President of Education Fund of America, LLC, which provided real estate funding for charter school facilities; he left EFA in 2016. Mr. Lloyd graduated from the University of New Hampshire Whittemore School of Business and Economics in 1970, with a B.A. degree; from the University of New Hampshire School of Law in 1973, with a J.D. degree (Order of the Coif); and from the Boston University School of Law in 1980, with an LLM in Taxation. Mr. Lloyd served in the U.S. Army from 1971 to 1974, and in the U.S. Army Reserves from 1974 to 1977. Among other civic posts, Mr. Lloyd is currently Vice Chairman of Northeast Catholic College in Warner, NH. (formerly Chairman) and member of the Board of Directors of the Sacred Heart Apostolate, Syracuse, NY.

Dr. Ted Topolski, PhD, 72 of Helena MT, was appointed as a director in August 2017. Dr. Topolski has over 35 years of experience in developing environmentally sound mining techniques and in providing reclamation and remediation services to the mining industry. His expertise is broadly based in metals mining and reclamation, but in the U.S. he has emphasized work in environmentally sensitive areas subject to EPA regulation. Dr. Topolski’s background also reflects work in the public sector, consulting for the governments of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. during the 1980s, including the development of a remediation protocol for metals in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone following the Chernobyl reactor explosion in 1986, and current advisory work for the Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce. Dr. Topolski is a principal of The Tanne Group, a Swiss conglomerate with interests in extractive industries world-wide, and an officer of GoldCorp Switzerland, GmbH, the owner and developer of precious metal mining properties throughout the American West.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors presently does not have any active committees.

Financial Expert

The Company does not currently have a designated “financial expert” on the Board of Directors. We believe that the cost of obtaining and retaining an independent director who can also serve as our financial expert is prohibitive at this time.

Information Concerning Non-Director Executive Officers

We currently have no executive officers serving who are non-directors.

Code of Ethics

We do not currently have a Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial, and accounting officers.

Potential Conflict of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our Board of Directors. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, including their own, and audit issues that may affect management decisions. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our officers or directors.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors assesses on an ongoing basis the risks faced by MCPI. These risks include financial, technological, competitive, and operational risks. The Board dedicates time at each of its meetings to review and consider the relevant risks faced at that time. In addition, since MCPI does not have an Audit Committee, the Board of Directors is also responsible for the assessment and oversight of MCPI’s financial risk exposures.

Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities ("10% holders"), to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common stock and other equity securities of the Company.

Directors, officers and 10% holders are required by SEC Regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all of the Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on a review of reports furnished to the Company and/or written representations from the Company's directors and executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, there was no compliance with the Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors, officers and 10% holders for such year.

Involvement on Certain Material Legal Proceedings During the Past Five (5) Years

(1)

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, exclusive of traffic violations or is subject to any pending criminal proceeding.

(2)

No bankruptcy petitions have been filed by or against any business or property of any director, officer, significant employee or consultant of the Company nor has any bankruptcy petition been filed against a partnership or business association where these persons were general partners or executive officers.

(3)

No director, officer, significant employee or consultant has been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.

(4)

No director, officer or significant employee has been convicted of violating a federal or state securities or commodities law.

Code of Ethics

The Company has not adopted a code of ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial, and accounting officers.

Item 11 - Executive Compensation

Executive Officers

Our Board of Directors appoints our executive officers to serve at the discretion of the board.

Executive Compensation

We do not have any employment or consulting agreements with any parties nor do we have a stock option plan or other equity compensation plans.

(Remainder of this page left blank intentionally)

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
John T. Bauska	2017	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	21,564	$	21,564
Principal Executive
and Financial Officer
Wayne Duke	2016	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-
Former Principal
Executive Officer
Carla Wienert,	2015	$	33,365	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	~~-0-~~33,365
Former Principal	~~2014~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~2,500~~	$	~~2,500~~
Executive Officer
Gracela Moreno,	2015	$	15,000		-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	15,000
Former Principal	~~2014~~	$	~~22,000~~		~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~-0-~~	$	~~22,000~~
Executive Officer

The Company has no other executive compensation issues which would require the inclusion of other mandated table disclosures.

Director Compensation

Ms. Wienert was paid $2,500 in Calendar 2014 after joining the Company as a director in November 2014. Mr. Bauska was paid an aggregate $21,564 for director’s fees and other unaccounted expenses during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Item 12 - Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of the date of this Annual Report, the number of shares of Common Stock owned of record and beneficially by executive officers, directors and persons who hold 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company. Also included are the shares held by all executive officers and directors as a group.

	Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
Name and address	Number of Shares		Percentage (3)
Armada Mining, Inc. (2)		284,580,000		84.6	%
1137 Highway 80 East
PO Box 1218
Tombstone AZ 86638
John T. Bauska (2)		284,580,000		84.6	%
1137 Highway 80 East
PO Box 1218
Tombstone AZ 86638
All Executive officers and
Directors as a Group (1 person)		284,580,000		84.6	%

(Remainder of this page left blank intentionally)

~~(1) On February 20, 2017, there were 336,300,000 shares of our common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. We have no outstanding stock options or warrants.~~22

	Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
Name and address	Number of Shares		Percentage (3)

Armada Mining, Inc. (2) 1137 Highway 80 East PO Box 1218 Tombstone AZ 86638	$	284,580,000		78.98	%

John T. Bauska (2) 1137 Highway 80 East PO Box 1218 Tombstone AZ 86638		284,580,000		78.98	%

Tom Collins 600 Park Meadow Drive Weatherford, TX 76087		24,000,000		6.66	%

All Executive officers and Directors as a Group (1 person)		284,580,000		78.98	%

(1)	On June 20, 2018, there were 360,300,000 shares of our common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. We have no outstanding stock options or warrants.

(2)

Under applicable SEC rules, a person is deemed the "beneficial owner" of a security with regard to which the person directly or indirectly, has or shares (a) the voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or (b) the investment power, which includes the power to dispose, or direct the disposition, of the security, in each case irrespective of the person's economic interest in the security. Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to beneficially own securities which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any option or warrant or through the conversion of another security.

(3) In determining the percent of voting stock owned by a person on December 31, 2017 (a) the numerator is the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the person, including shares the beneficial ownership of which may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities, and (b) the denominator is the total of (i) the 360,300,000 shares of common stock outstanding on February 20, 2016, and (ii) any shares of common stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days upon the exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities. Neither the numerator nor the denominator includes shares which may be issued upon the exercise of any other options or warrants or the conversion of any other convertible securities.

(3) In determining the percent of voting stock owned by a person on December 31, 2016 (a) the numerator is the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the person, including shares the beneficial ownership of which may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities, and (b) the denominator is the total of (i) the 336,300,000 shares of common stock outstanding on February 20, 2016, and (ii) any shares of common stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days upon the exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities. Neither the numerator nor the denominator includes shares which may be issued upon the exercise of any other options or warrants or the conversion of any other convertible securities.

Changes in Control

~~Upon~~Mining, ~~completion~~Inc. of ~~the~~Tombstone, ~~terms~~Arizona, ofan ~~the~~Arizona ~~Agreement,~~corporation (Armada). Under ~~will~~the ~~own~~terms ~~approximately 85%~~ of the Agreement, the Company~~’s post-transaction~~ issued ~~and outstanding common stock.~~ ~~Armada~~284,580,000 ~~has~~shares ~~represented to the Company that it anticipates exchanging a portion~~ of ~~these~~its ~~shares~~common ~~with~~stock ~~their existing shareholders; using a portion~~ to ~~satisfy~~Armada ~~existing~~in ~~obligations~~exchange tofor ~~related~~rights ~~parties~~ and ~~others;~~interests ~~and~~in ~~using~~mining aproperties ~~portion~~in tothe ~~finance~~historic ~~other~~Tombstone ~~Armada~~Mining ~~operations~~District of Arizona.

On June 27, 2017, the Registrant announced that the due diligence process, although not totally complete, was sufficient to close the November 28, 2016 transaction. Accordingly, Armada owned approximately 85% of the Company’s post-transaction issued and outstanding common stock. Although, Armada represented to the Company that it anticipated exchanging a portion of these shares with their existing shareholders; using a portion to satisfy existing obligations to related parties and others; and using a portion to finance other Armada operations, Armada retains possession of all 284,580,000 shares as of the filing of this report.

Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Relationships and Transactions

On ~~March~~September 2730, ~~2014~~2015, ~~certain~~the ~~shareholders~~Company ofexecuted a replacement Promissory Note with the ~~Company (formerly~~principal stockholder ~~MCPI,~~of ~~Inc.;~~South ~~Med-Cannabis~~Beach ~~Pharma~~Live, ~~Inc~~Ltd.; orin SWthe ~~China~~amount ~~Imports~~of $927,000, ~~Inc~~bearing interest at 12.)0% ~~sold~~and ~~210~~payable in monthly installments of approximately $13,~~000~~300,~~000~~ ~~shares~~including ofaccrued ~~then~~interest ~~issued~~with a final maturity and ~~outstanding~~balloon ~~shares~~payment ofdue ~~common~~on ~~stock~~October to31, 2016. As ~~Big~~of ~~Sky~~December ~~Oil~~31, ~~Inc.~~2015, ~~and~~the ~~another~~outstanding ~~investor~~balance on this note was approximately $950,008 ~~resulting~~as the lender continued to advance funds to support the Company’s working capital needs. The Company was delinquent in amaking ~~change~~the ofrequired ~~control~~monthly installment payments.

~~In the change of control agreements dated March 27, 2014, $1,806 of related party debt was forgiven by a former shareholder.~~23

On ~~July~~June 281, ~~2014~~2016, the Company entered into a ~~$500~~Settlement,~~000~~ ~~Line~~General ofand ~~Credit~~Mutual ~~note~~Release ~~payable~~of ~~with~~Claims and ~~South~~Assignment ~~Beach~~of ~~Live,~~Interest ~~Ltd.~~Transfer Agreement (~~South~~Settlement ~~Beach~~Agreement), awith ~~Company~~its ~~stockholder~~majority shareholder and ana ~~entity~~ related toparty. The aSettlement ~~significant~~Agreement ~~Company~~relates ~~stockholder,~~ to ~~provide funds necessary to support~~ the ~~corporate~~Company’s ~~entity~~management ~~and~~of ~~provide~~three ~~working~~medical ~~capital~~marijuana todispensaries ~~pursue~~(Stores) ~~business~~located ~~combination~~in Oregon, orwhich ~~acquisition~~are ~~opportunities. This~~owned ~~note~~by ~~bore~~Bendor ~~interest~~Investments, ~~at 10~~Ltd.0% ~~and~~(Bendor), ~~matured~~whose insole ~~July 2015. This note replaced a non-interest bearing~~ shareholder ~~note~~is ~~payable~~Charles ~~to a former controlling stockholder that was assumed during a 2014 change in control transaction~~Stidham. ~~During~~The ~~the~~Company ~~twelve~~owed ~~months~~Mr. ~~ended~~Stidham ~~December~~approximately 31$1, ~~2014~~100,000, ~~the~~including ~~Company~~accrued ~~recognized an aggregate $4~~interest,~~973~~ as ~~additional~~of ~~paid-in capital for~~ the ~~economic~~date ~~event~~of ~~related to~~ the ~~non-interest~~Settlement ~~bearing feature on the assumed note payable through its retirement~~Agreement.

On September 30, 2015, the Company executed a replacement Promissory Note with the principal stockholder of South Beach Live, Ltd. in the amount of $927,000, bearing interest at 12.0% and payable in monthly installments of approximately $13,300, including accrued interest with a final maturity and balloon payment due on October 31, 2016.

As of December 31, 2015, the outstanding balance on this note is approximately $950,008 as the lender continues to advance funds to support the Company’s working capital needs. The Company is delinquent in making the required monthly installment payments.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Settlement, General and Mutual Release of Claims and Assignment of Interest Transfer Agreement (Settlement Agreement) with its majority shareholder and a related party. The Settlement Agreement relates to the Company’s management of three medical marijuana dispensaries (Stores) located in Oregon, which are owned by Bendor Investments, Ltd. (Bendor), whose sole shareholder is Charles Stidham. The Company owes Mr. Stidham approximately $1,100,000, including accrued interest, as of the date of the Settlement Agreement.

Conflicts of Interest

Certain conflicts of interest could arise in the future, including, but not limited to, the following:

·	None of our officers and directors is required to commit their full time to our affairs and, accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time among various business activities.

In the course of their other business activities, our officers and directors may become aware of investment and business opportunities that may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as the other entities with which they are affiliated. They may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

·	Our officers and directors may in the future become affiliated with entities, including other blank check companies, engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us.

Since all of our directors own shares of our common stock that could be sold, in whole or in part, as a negotiated element of a business acquisition, our board may have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is appropriate to effect a business combination. The personal and financial interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business and completing a business combination.

In general, officers and directors of a Nevada corporation are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:

·	the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;

·	the opportunity is within the corporation's line of business; and

·	it would not be fair to the corporation and its stockholders for the opportunity not to be brought to the attention of the corporation.

Accordingly, as a result of multiple business affiliations, our officers and directors may have similar legal obligations relating to presenting business opportunities meeting the above-listed criteria to multiple entities. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise when our board evaluates a particular business opportunity with respect to the ~~above-listed~~abovelisted criteria. We cannot assure you that any of the above mentioned conflicts will be resolved in our favor.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that none of its directors is "independent" under the criteria set forth in Rule 5065(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Board does not have a separately designated audit, nominating, or compensation committee, so the functions normally attributed to these committees are performed by the entire board. Accordingly, none of our directors is "independent" under applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules that define independence for purposes of directors performing the functions of such committees.

(Remainder of this page left blank intentionally)

Item 14 - Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Company paid or accrued the following fees in each of the prior two fiscal years to it’s principal accountant(s), David ~~M&K~~S. ~~CPA’s~~Friedkin, ~~PLLC~~CPA of ~~Houston~~River Vale, ~~Texas~~NJ and L&L CPA’s PA (formerly Bongiovanni & Associates, PA) of Cornelius, NC:

	Year ended	~~Year ended~~		Year ended	~~Year ended~~
	December 31,	~~December 31,~~		December 31,	~~December 31,~~
		2015			2015
	2017			2016
1. Audit fees
1.Audit fees
M&K CPA’s, PLLC		$	—		$	13,285
David S. Friedkin, CPA		$	22,000		$	-
L & L CPA’s PA (formerly Bongiovanni & Associates, PA)			~~9,500~~-			89,~~000~~500
2. Audit-related fees			—-			—-
3. Tax fees			—-			—-
4. All other fees			—			—
4.All other fees			-			-
Totals		$	922,~~500~~000		$	219,~~285~~500

We have considered whether the provision of any non-audit services, currently or in the future, by our principal accounting firm is compatible with their maintaining their independence and have determined that these services do not compromise their independence.

Financial Information System Design and Implementation: Our principal accountants did not charge the Company any fees for financial information system design and implementation fees.

The Company has no formal audit committee. However, the entire Board of Directors (Board) is the Company's defacto audit committee. In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Board obtained from the independent auditors a formal written statement describing all relationships between the auditors and the Company that might bear on the auditors' independence as required by the appropriate Professional Standards issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission and/or the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The Board discussed with the auditors any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence, including fees for non-audit services, and satisfied itself as to the auditors' independence. The Board also discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of the Company's internal controls.

The Company’s principal accounting firm(s) did not engage any other persons or firms other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

Item 15 - Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

3.1*	Articles of Incorporation

3.2*

Bylaws

31.1	Section 302 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T. (+)

~~(+)~~* -Incorporated toby beour Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed ~~separately~~May by3, ~~amendment~~2011

*Item ~~Incorporated~~16 by- ~~our Registration Statement on~~ Form S10-1K ~~filed May 3, 2011.~~Summary

None

(Financial statements begin on the following page)

2325

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

CONTENTS

	Page
Report of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm
David S. Friedkin, CPA	F-2
BF Borgers CPA PC	F-2
L&L CPAS PA	F-3
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-4
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-5
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-4
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-6
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-7
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-87

F-1

~~LETTERHEAD~~Report OFof ~~DAVID~~Independent S.Registered ~~FRIEDKIN,~~Public ~~CPA~~Accounting Firm

~~REPORT~~To OFthe ~~INDEPENDENT~~shareholders ~~REGISTERED~~and ~~PUBLIC~~the ~~ACCOUNTING~~board ~~FIRM~~of directors of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

ToOpinion on the ~~Board~~Financial ~~of Directors and Shareholders~~Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (~~formerly~~deficit), ~~MCPI~~and cash flows for the years then ended, ~~Inc.~~and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

WeBasis have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. (formerly MCPI, Inc.) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, accumulated deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. as of December 31, 2015, were audited by other auditors whose report dated August 1, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. Those statements included an explanatory paragraph that described the Company’s uncertainty to continue as a going concern discussed in Note C of those financial statements.Opinion

WeThese ~~conducted~~financial ~~our~~statements ~~audit~~are ~~in accordance with~~ the ~~standards~~responsibility of the ~~Public~~ Company's ~~Accounting Oversight Board (United States)~~management. ~~Those~~ ~~standards~~Our ~~require~~responsibility ~~that~~is ~~we plan and perform the audit~~ to ~~obtain~~express ~~reasonable~~an opinion ~~assurance~~on ~~about whether~~ the Company's financial statements ~~are~~based ~~free~~on ofour ~~material misstatement~~audit. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~We isare ~~not~~a ~~required~~public toaccounting ~~have,~~firm ~~nor~~registered ~~were~~with wethe ~~engaged~~Public toCompany ~~perform,~~Accounting anOversight ~~audit~~Board of(United ~~its~~States) ~~internal~~("PCAOB") ~~control~~and ~~over~~are ~~financial~~required ~~reporting. Our~~to ~~audit~~be ~~included~~independent ~~consideration~~with ofrespect ~~internal~~to ~~control~~the Company ~~over~~in ~~financial~~accordance ~~reporting~~with asthe aU.S. ~~basis~~federal ~~for~~securities ~~designing~~laws ~~audit~~and ~~procedures that are appropriate in~~ the ~~circumstances,~~applicable ~~but~~rules ~~not~~and ~~for~~regulations ~~the purpose~~ of ~~expressing~~the anSecurities ~~opinion~~and onExchange ~~the~~Commission ~~effectiveness~~and of the ~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting~~PCAOB. ~~Accordingly,~~We weconducted ~~express~~our ~~no such opinion. An~~ audit ~~also~~in ~~includes~~accordance ~~examining,~~with ~~on a test basis, evidence supporting~~ the ~~amounts~~standards ~~and~~of ~~disclosures in~~ the ~~financial~~PCAOB. ~~statements,~~Those ~~assessing~~standards require ~~the~~that ~~accounting~~we ~~principles~~plan ~~used~~ and ~~significant~~perform ~~estimates~~the ~~made~~audit byto ~~management,~~obtain asreasonable ~~well~~assurance asabout ~~evaluating~~whether the ~~overall~~ financial ~~statement~~statements ~~presentation. We~~are ~~believe~~free ~~that~~of ~~our~~material ~~audit~~misstatement, ~~provides~~whether adue ~~reasonable~~to ~~basis~~error ~~for~~or ~~our opinion~~fraud.

InOur ~~our~~audit ~~opinion,~~included performing procedures to assess the ~~consolidated~~risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether ~~referred~~due to ~~above~~error ~~present~~or ~~fairly~~fraud, inand ~~all~~performing ~~material~~procedures ~~respects,~~that ~~the~~respond ~~financial~~to ~~position~~those ofrisks. ~~Mansfield-Martin~~Such ~~Exploration~~procedures ~~Mining~~included examining, ~~Inc.~~on ~~and~~a ~~Subsidiaries~~test asbasis, ofevidence ~~December~~regarding ~~31,~~the ~~2016~~amounts and disclosures in the ~~results~~financial ofstatements. ~~their~~Our ~~operations~~audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and ~~their~~significant ~~cash~~estimates ~~flows~~made ~~for~~by ~~the~~management, ~~year~~as ~~then~~well ~~ended~~as inevaluating ~~conformity~~the ~~with~~overall Upresentation of the financial statements.S. ~~generally~~We ~~accepted~~believe ~~accounting~~that ~~principles~~our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~The~~Substantial ~~accompanying~~Doubt ~~consolidated~~about ~~financial statements have been prepared assuming that~~ the Company ~~will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note C to the financial statements, the Company has insufficient working capital, a stockholders~~’s ~~deficit,~~Ability ~~recurring net losses, and a current business plan with significant risk, which raises substantial doubt about its ability~~ to ~~continue~~Continue as a ~~going~~Going ~~concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note C. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.~~Concern

/The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note C to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a significant accumulated deficit. In addition, the Company continues to experience negative cash flows from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's/ ~~David~~ability Sto continue as a going concern. ~~Friedkin~~Management's ~~CPA~~ plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note C. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~River~~/S/ ~~Vale,~~BF ~~New~~Borgers ~~Jersey~~CPA PC

~~April~~BF ~~12th,~~Borgers ~~2017~~CPA PC

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018

Lakewood, CO

August 22, 2019

F-2

LETTERHEAD OF L&L CPAS PA

REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

MCPI, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited for accompanying balance sheet of MCPI, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2015 and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders’s deficit and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note C to the financial statements, the Company has insufficient working capital, a stockholders’ deficit and recurring net losses, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note C. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ L&L CPAS, PA

L&L CPAS, PA

F.K.A. Bongiovanni & Associates, PA

Certified Public Accountants

Cornelius, North Carolina

The United States of America

August 1, 2016

F-3

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—-		$	—-
Total Current Assets		—-			—-
Total Assets	$	—		$	—
Other Assets
Prepaid capital commitment fee		-			-
Investment in Tombstone Development Corp., net of impairment of approximately $1,000		-			-
Investment in mining leases and claims, net of impairment of approximately $5,008,741		-			-
Total Assets	$	-		$	-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable - Trade	$	1236,~~236~~428		$	2012,~~947~~236
Accrued expenses to former management		59,846			59,846
Accrued interest payable to stockholder		60,888			81,816
Accrued interest payable Note payable to		262,277			60,888
Note payable to stockholder		820,371			607,314
Mining leases/claims		1,460,000			-
Total Liabilities		953,341			769,923
Financial services firm		90,000			-
Stockholder		797,371			820,371
Management services company		89,838			-
Total Liabilities		2,795,760			953,341
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value 25,000,000 shares authorized.
25,000,000 shares authorized.
None issued and outstanding.		-			-
None issued and outstanding.		—			—
Common stock - $0.001 par value. 500,000,000 shares authorized.
Common stock - $0.001 par value.
360,300,000 and 50,720,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively,
500,000,000 shares authorized.
84,500,000 shares issued in escrow at December 31, 2016		360,300			51,720
50,720,000 and 50,220,000 shares
Additional paid-in capital		63,564,890			59,552,470
issued and outstanding		51,720			50,220
Accumulated deficit		(66,720,950	)		(60,557,531	)
Additional paid-in capital		59,552,470			59,336,620
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(2,795,760	)		(953,341	)
Accumulated deficit		(60,557,531	)		(60,156,763	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	-		$	-
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(953,341	)		(769,923	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	—		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-43

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	Year ended			Year ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Revenues	$	—-		$	—-
Cost of Sales		—-			—-
Gross Profit		—			—
Gross Profit Operating expenses		-			-
Operating expenses
Professional fees		189,762			98,793
Professional fees		98,793			462,640
General and administrative costs		7,053			-
General and administrative costs		—			98,485
Depreciation and amortization		-			-
Depreciation and amortization		—			—
Total operating expenses		196,815			98,793
Total operating expenses		98,793			561,125
Loss from operations		(196,815	)		(98,793	)
Loss from operations		(98,793	)		(561,125	)
Other income (expense)
Loss on abandonment of grow operation		—			(52,644	)
Impairment of mining leases and claims and investment in Tombstone Development Corp.		(5,009,741	)		-
Loss on theft of grow operation assets		—			(51,380	)
Interest expense on notes payable, inclusive of fair market” adjustments for
Interest expense on notes payable to stockholders		(301,975	)		(73,340	)
debt conversion into common stock of approximately $816,000 and $217,200, respectively		(956,863	)		(301,975	)
Loss before provision for income taxes		(~~400~~6,~~768~~163,419	)		(~~738~~400,~~489~~768	)
Provision for income taxes		—-			—-
Net loss		(~~400~~6,~~768~~163,419	)		(~~738~~400,~~489~~768	)
Other comprehensive income		—-			—-
Comprehensive loss	$	(~~400~~6,~~768~~163,419	)	$	(~~738~~400,~~489~~768	)
Loss per weighted-average share of common stock outstanding,
computed on net loss - basic and fully diluted	$	(0.0102	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding -
basic and fully diluted		50340,~~347~~902,~~049~~740			50,~~217~~347,~~945~~049

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-54

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

					Additional
	Common Stock				paid-in		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		capital		Deficit			Total
Balances at December 31, 2014		50,170,000	$	50,170	$	59,021,670	$	(59,418,274	)	$	(346,434	)
Balances at December 31, 2015		50,220,000	$	50,220	$	59,336,620	$	(60,156,763	)	$	(769,923	)
Issuance of common stock for consulting fees		50,000		50		14,950		—			15,000
Partial conversion of note payable to common stock		1,500,000		1,500		125,850		-			217,150
Contributed capital		—		—		300,000		—			300,000
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		(400,768	)		(400,768	)
Net loss for the year		—		—		—		(738,489	)		(738,489	)
Balances at December 31, 2016		51,720,000		51,720		59,552,470		(60,557,531	)		(953,341	)
Balances at December 31, 2015		50,220,000		50,220		59,336,620		(60,156,763	)		(769,923	)
Issuance of common stock from escrow for acquisition of mining properties		284,580,000		284,580		3,196,420		-			3,481,000
Partial conversion of note payable to common stock		1,500,000		1,500		125,850		—			217,150
Issuance of common stock in partial payment of a note payable to stockholder		24,000,000		24,000		-		-			24,000
Net loss for the year		—		—		—		(400,768	)		(400,768	)
Excess fair value adjustment on stock issued for debt conversion		-		-		816,000		-			816,000
Balances at December 31, 2016		51,720,000	$	51,720	$	59,552,470	$	(60,557,531	)	$	(953,341	)
Net loss for the year		-		-		-		(6,163,419	)		(6,163,419	)
Balances at December 31, 2017		360,300,000	$	360,300	$	63,564,890	$	(66,720,950	)	$	(2,795,760	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-65

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

	Year ended			Year ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss) for the period	$	(~~400~~6,~~768~~163,419	)	$	(~~738~~400,~~489~~768	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		—-			—-
Common stock issued for professional fees		—			315,000
Impairment of mining leases and claims and Investment in Tombstone Development Corp.		5,009,741			-
Note payable to related party restructuring fees		21,140			—
Note payable issued for capital placement fees		90,000			-
Financing expense related to partial conversion of note payable to common stock		217,200			—
Note payable to related party restructuring fees		-			21,140
Financing expense related to partial conversion of note payable to common stock		816,000			217,200
Increase (Decrease) in
Accounts payable		(825,~~711~~192	)		53(8,~~561~~711	)
Accrued expenses		84140,~~775~~863			7684,~~430~~775
Deferred revenues		—			(5,000	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(81,623	)		(86,364	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(86,364	)		(298,498	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities		—			—
Cash paid for registration of mining claims		(8,215	)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,215	)		-
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash received from notes payable to stockholders		86,364			283,735
Cash received from notes payable to stockholders and management services company		89,838			86,364
Net cash provided by financing activities		—89,838			~~283~~86,~~735~~364
Increase (Decrease) in Cash		—-			~~(14,763~~-	)
Cash at beginning of period		—-			~~14,763~~-
Cash at end of period	$	—-		$	—-
Supplemental Disclosure of Interest and Income Taxes Paid
Interest paid during the period	$	—-		$	—-
Income taxes paid during the period	$	—-		$	—-
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Partial conversion of note payable to common stock	$	(150	)	$	—
Acquisition of Tombstone Development Company and various mining claims and leases with
the assumption of a certain note payable, issuance of a note payable and issuance of common stock	$	5,001,526		$	-
Payment of a capital commitment fee with a note payable	$	90,000		$	-
Partial conversion of note payable to common stock	$	(24,000	)	$	(150	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-76

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

~~(formerly~~Notes ~~MCPI,~~to ~~Inc.)~~Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

~~Notes~~December to31, ~~Consolidated~~2017 ~~Financial~~and ~~Statements~~2016

December 31, 2016 and 2015

Note A - Background and Description of Business

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. (“Company” or “~~Med-Cannabis Pharma~~MMEM”) was incorporated under the ~~laws~~ Laws of the State of Nevada on February 23, 2011~~. The~~ ~~Company was originally incorporated~~ as SW China Imports, Inc. ~~on February 23, 2011 in the State of Nevada.~~ The Company’s initial business plan was to import high-end handmade lace wigs, hairpieces, and other beauty supplies and accessories manufactured overseas into the United States. In June 2014, the Company changed its name to Med-Cannabis Pharma, Inc. and implemented a new business plan to enter into the retail sale of medical and personal use marijuana, where allowable. In October 2015, the Company changed its name to MCPI, Inc. In March 2017, the Company, in anticipation of consummating a proposed asset acquisition transaction, changed its name to Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Management, Inc. and High Desert MMJ, Inc. Prior thereto, the Company’s subsidiaries were Medical Management Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation engaged in providing back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries in the State of Oregon; Med-Pharma Management, Inc., a Washington State corporation which was formed to own, manage or provide back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries in Washington State; and High Desert MMJ, Inc. an Oregon corporation, which is a 99.0% partner in Emerald Mountain Organics, an Oregon joint venture, formed to facilitate the development and growing of medical marijuana plants for wholesale distribution to licenced dispensaries in the State of Oregon.

As of December 31, 2015, Medical Management Systems, Inc. held a Management Contract for three marijuana dispensaries located in Newport, Bend and Cottage Grove, Oregon; which are owned by a company controlled by a related party. This Management Contract was terminated by the consent of both parties, effective March 31, 2016. Med-Pharma only conducted introductory due diligence efforts in the State of Washington and, currently, had abandoned all activities in the State of Washington. Emerald Mountain Organics had, as of September 30,2015, established an early-phase growing operation and has generated nominal sales.

During the first 10 days of October 2015, the Company’s subsidiary, High Desert MMJ, Inc., learned that the 1.0% minority partner in the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture had absconded with all of the assets of the joint venture. Efforts to locate and recover either the individuals representing said 1.0% minority partner or the said absconded assets were unsuccessful. Accordingly, effective October 10, 2015, High Desert MMJ, Inc. abandoned the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture and wrote off said investment. The cumulative start-up losses in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture, through the date of abandonment were approximately $53,000 and the Company recognized a loss on the stolen assets of approximately $51,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Settlement, General and Mutual Release of Claims and Assignment of Interest Transfer Agreement (Settlement Agreement) with its majority shareholder and a related party. The Settlement Agreement relates to the Company’s management of three medical marijuana dispensaries (Stores) located in Oregon, which are owned by Bendor Investments, Ltd. (Bendor), whose sole shareholder is Charles Stidham. The Company owes Mr. Stidham approximately $1,100,000, including accrued interest, as of the date of the Settlement Agreement.

The Company asserted a claim for management fees of approximately $80,000 and reimbursement of monies advanced to support the operations of the Stores totaling approximately $343,000 for the services of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Medical Management Systems, Inc. (MMS), in managing the Stores. Bendor disputed this claim. To resolve the dispute, the parties agreed to forgive the accrued management fees and to offset the approximately $343,000 due from Bendor against the approximately $1,100,000 owed to Mr. Stidham with the Company releasing any and all interests it may have had in the Stores and MMS. Additionally, the Company agreed to assign a trademark to Mr. Stidham as well as executing a new Note in the principal sum of $752,694.19.

F-7

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note A - Background and Description of Business - continued

On November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement) with Armada Mining, Inc. of Tombstone, Arizona, an Arizona corporation (Armada). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock to Armada, its affiliates, related entities and other common parties in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the Tombstone Mining District of Arizona. The Company will acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. Subject to the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals, by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development.

Upon completion of the terms of the Agreement, Armada will own approximately 85% of the Company’s post-transaction issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Armada has represented to the Company that it anticipates exchanging a portion of these shares with their existing shareholders; using a portion to satisfy existing obligations to related parties and others; and using a portion to finance other Armada operations. The Agreement anticipates that Company, post-transaction, will have new Board of Directors that will, in turn, appoint new management for the Company. Additionally, the Company and Armada have facilitated a change in the Company’s corporate name to better reflect the nature and focus of the Company’s proposed ongoing and future business interests. This transaction closed on June 27, 2017.

Note B - Preparation of Financial Statements

The Company follows the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and has elected a year-end of December 31.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-8

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2016 and 2015

Note B - Preparation of Financial Statements - Continued

Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

For segment reporting purposes, the Company operated in only one industry segment during the periods represented in the accompanying financial statements and makes all operating decisions and allocates resources based on the best benefit to the Company as a whole.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements, as of and for the periods ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively and as appropriate, contain the accounts of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.; its former wholly-owned subsidiaries, Medical Management Systems, Inc., Med-Pharma Management, Inc., High Desert MMJ, Inc.; and it’s former majority-owned joint venture, Emerald Mountain Organics. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated entities are collectively referred to as “Company”.

Note C - Going Concern Uncertainty

The Company ~~was~~currently inowns ~~the~~a ~~initial~~minority ~~phases~~position ~~of providing back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries and participates~~ in avarious ~~marijuana~~mining ~~development~~claims and/or ~~growing~~leases ~~operation, all~~ located in the ~~State of Oregon. The dispensary operations under management by Medical Management Systems~~Tombstone, ~~Inc.~~Arizona ~~began~~Mining ~~generating positive cash flows from operations during the 4th quarter of 2015~~District. ~~However,~~It ~~management~~is ~~terminated~~ the ~~Medical~~Company’s ~~Management~~intent ~~Systems,~~to ~~Inc.~~raise ~~Management~~sufficient ~~Agreement~~capital onto ~~March~~successfully ~~31,~~exploit ~~2016 and wrote off all management fees (and deferred revenues) through that date. Further,~~ the ~~Company~~mineral ~~liquidated~~deposits ~~its~~contained ~~Med-Pharma~~in ~~Management,~~these ~~Inc~~claims/leases. ~~and High Desert MMJ, Inc. subsidiaries as of March 31, 2016.~~ All other efforts started by the Company and/or its subsidiaries in prior periods were either unsuccessful or abandoned. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successful in the implementation or operation of its current business plan.

F-8

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note C - Going Concern Uncertainty - continued

The Company has limited operating history, limited cash on hand, no operating assets and has a business plan with inherent risk. Because of these factors, the Company’s auditors have issued an audit opinion on the Company’s financial statements which includes a statement describing our going concern status. This means, in the auditor’s opinion, substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern exists at the date of their opinion.

Because of the Company's lack of operating assets, the Company’s continuance may become fully dependent upon either future sales of securities and/or advances or loans from significant stockholders or corporate officers to provide sufficient working capital to preserve the integrity of the corporate entity during the development phase.

The Company's continued existence is dependent upon its ability to implement its business plan, generate sufficient cash flows from operations to support its daily operations, and provide sufficient resources to retire existing liabilities and obligations on a timely basis. The Company faces considerable risk in it’s business plan and a potential shortfall of funding due to our uncertainty to raise adequate capital in the equity securities market.

F-9

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2016 and 2015

Note C - Going Concern Uncertainty - Continued

Note D - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1.	Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all cash on hand and in banks, certificates of deposit and other highly-liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash and cash equivalents.

2.	Organization costs

The Company has adopted the provisions of provisions required by the Start-Up Activities topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification whereby all costs incurred with the incorporation and reorganization of the Company were charged to operations as incurred.

F-9

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note D - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

3.	Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized by the Company at the point at which a transaction is delivered or services are provided to a consumer at a fixed price, collection is reasonably assured, the Company has no remaining performance obligations and no right of return by the purchaser exists.

4.	Income taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the United States of America and various states, as appropriate and applicable. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, as applicable, income tax examinations by regulatory taxing authorities for any period prior to January 1, ~~2011~~ 2013.

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, the deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability accounts, as recorded when material to the financial statements, are entirely the result of temporary differences. Temporary differences generally represent differences in the recognition of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes, primarily accumulated depreciation and amortization, allowance for doubtful accounts and vacation accruals.

The Company has adopted the provisions required by the Income Taxes topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Codification Topic requires the recognition of potential liabilities as a result of management’s acceptance of potentially uncertain positions for income tax treatment on a “more-likely-than-not” probability of an assessment upon examination by a respective taxing authority. As a result of the implementation of Codification’s Income Tax Topic, the Company did not incur any liability for unrecognized tax benefits.

Income (Loss) per share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the respective period presented in our accompanying financial statements.

Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic income (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of common stock equivalents (primarily outstanding options and warrants).

Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of the outstanding stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method, at either the beginning of the respective period presented or the date of issuance, whichever is later, and only if the common stock equivalents are considered dilutive based upon the Company’s net income (loss) position at the calculation date.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, the Company does not have any outstanding items which could be deemed to be dilutive.

F-10

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2016 and 2015

Note D - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

New and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

The Company is of the opinion that any and all other pending accounting pronouncements, either in the adoption phase or not yet required to be adopted, will not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Note E - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable, as applicable, approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these items and/or the current interest rates payable in relation to current market conditions.

Interest rate risk is the risk that the Company’s earnings are subject to fluctuations in interest rates on either investments or on debt and is fully dependent upon the volatility of these rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments to moderate its exposure to interest rate risk, if any.

F-10

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note E - Fair Value of Financial Instruments - continued

Financial risk is the risk that the Company’s earnings are subject to fluctuations in interest rates or foreign exchange rates and are fully dependent upon the volatility of these rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments to moderate its exposure to financial risk, if any.

Note F - ~~Notes~~Mining ~~Payable~~Leases toand ~~Stockholders~~Claims

On November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of this Agreement, the Company issued issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock into escrow for the benefit of Armada Mining, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and/or its assigns (Armada) in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the historic Tombstone Mining District. The Agreement allows for the Company to acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. A copy of the Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on or about November 28, 2016.

This exchange resulted in Armada owning approximately 85% of the Company, post-transaction. Subject to financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals; by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques; and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development.

The completion of the acquisition of these currently non-performing claims/leases was initially subject to the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate financing and various regulatory approvals. On June 27, 2017, the Company announced that the due diligence process, although not totally complete, was sufficient to close the November 28, 2016 transaction. The transaction closed as follows:

F-11

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note F - Mining Leases and Claims - continued

The Company received an assignment of 47.5% of certain claims/leases, covering approximately 2,300 contiguous acres, controlled by an affiliate of Armada. At the time the Armada affiliate receives approximately $800,000 in net proceeds from the development of the affiliated claims, the Armada affiliate will transfer the residual 52.5% to the Company for no additional consideration. This piece of the transaction was valued at the nominal value of approximately $2,300,000, which equals the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

The “wrap” note issued to Armada is for an aggregate $900,000 and bears interest at 7.0% interest. The “wrap” note is due on December 31, 2018 and may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

Management has evaluated the carrying value of these assets as of December 31, 2017, and subsequent thereto, and has determined that given the absence of development capital there is limited value to these assets. Accordingly, management has provided an impairment equal to the net recorded value of these assets as of December 31, 2017.

Note G - Notes Payable to Stockholders

On July 28, 2014, the Company entered into a $500,000 Line of Credit note payable with South Beach Live, Ltd. (South Beach), a Company stockholder and an entity related to a significant Company stockholder, to provide funds necessary to support the corporate entity and provide working capital to pursue business combination or acquisition opportunities. This note bore interest at 10.0% and matured in July 2015. This note replaced a non-interest bearing shareholder note payable to a former controlling stockholder that was assumed during a 2014 change in control transaction. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized an aggregate $4,973 as additional paid-in capital for the economic event related to the non-interest bearing feature on the assumed note payable through its retirement.

On May 11, 2016, as a component of the aforementioned Settlement Agreement, the Company and Charles Stidham, who was, directly and indirectly, a controlling stockholder of the Company, entered into a new Promissory Note agreement dated March 31, 2016. The note is for the principal amount of $752,694.19, bears interest at 10.0% per annum and requires monthly debt service payments of approximately $15,992.55 commencing June 30, 2016 through June 30, 2017, at which time all remaining principal and accrued interest is due and payable. The note also contains a repayment clause where the principal and accrued interest may be paid in common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.001 per share.

For all periods from the inception of the debt through the date of these financial statements, the lender formally suspended the common stock conversion clause contained in the note. On November 30, 2016, the lender notified the Company that the lender was exercising the common stock conversion clause for the repayment of $150 in debt and continuing the suspension of the conversion clause for the remaining balance of the debt. The continuation of the suspension of the conversion clause remains in effect as of the date of these financial statements. The Company is delinquent in making the scheduled monthly debt service payments and no action is expected to be taken by the lender.

~~Through~~On ~~December~~November 3130, 2016 ~~and 2015~~, ~~respectively,~~the anlender ~~aggregate~~notified ofthe ~~approximately~~Company ~~$820,371~~that ~~and~~the ~~$607,314,~~lender ~~inclusive~~was ofexercising the ~~effect~~common stock ofconversion ~~the~~clause ~~June~~for ~~1, 2016 Settlement Agreement, as~~ the ~~lender~~repayment ~~continues~~of to$150 ~~advance~~in ~~funds~~debt toand ~~support~~continuing the ~~Company’s~~suspension ~~working~~of ~~capital~~the ~~needs. The~~conversion ~~Company~~clause isfor ~~delinquent in making~~ the ~~required~~remaining ~~monthly~~balance ~~installment~~of ~~payments~~the debt.

On October 22, 2017, the lender notified the Company that the lender was exercising the common stock conversion clause for the repayment of $24,000 in debt and continuing the suspension of the0 conversion clause for the remaining balance of the debt.

F-12

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note G - Notes Payable to Stockholders - continued

The continuation of the suspension of the conversion clause remains in effect as of the date of these financial statements and the Company remains delinquent in making the scheduled monthly debt service payments and no action is expected to be taken by the lender.

Through December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, the outstanding principal balance on this indebtedness is approximately $797,371 and $820,371 , inclusive of the effect of the June 1, 2016 Settlement Agreement and all conversions and advances, These funds were used to support the Company’s working capital needs in prior periods.

Note H - Note Payable to Management Services Company

Concurrent with the November 2016 proposed transaction with Armada, the Company engaged the services of an unrelated third-party to provide management services to the Company on a “for fee” month-to-month informal agreement. Included in the services to be provided is a line-of-credit note payable up to the amount of $150,000 with interest at 6.0% per annum. The note matures on December 31, 2017 or when the Company completes a successful capital infusion of at least $500,000 directly related to the commencement of mining operations in and around Tombstone, Arizona. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, approximately $89,838 and $-0- had been advanced against this line-of-credit.

Note I - Note Payable to Financial Services Firm

On February 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (MDA) with L2 Capital, LLC, a

Kansas limited liability company (“L2 Capital”). Our MDA has several components: 1) Under the Equity Purchase Agreement (‘Equity Line”), the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell shares of its common stock to L2 Capital at 75% of the prevailing OTC market price, as determined by the public market over time periods set out in the Equity Line, for up to $3,000,000 and 2) Under the Registration Rights Agreement (“Registration Rights”), the Company is obliged to register the offering of shares to be put under the Equity Line with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-1, and certain Blue Sky regulators, so that L2 Capital may, presumably, resell such shares under our Rule 424 Prospectus.

The Company paid a 3% capital commitment fee to L2 Capital, by issuing to it a $90,000 8% Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) The Note requires us to repay $45,000, with interest, in six (6) months, and the balance upon the effective date of the referenced Form S-1, or an additional six (6) months, whichever is earlier. Our default would trigger conversion rights in favor of L2 Capital, permitting it to demand issuance of shares at a 30% discount to market sufficient to satisfy any amounts due.

(Remainder of this page left blank intentionally)

F-1113

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note GJ - Income Taxes

The components of income tax (benefit) expense for the each of the years ended December 31, 2017 ~~2016~~ and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, are as follows:

	Year ended		Year ended
	December 31,		December 31,
	2016		2015
	2017		2016
Federal:
Current	$	—-	$	—-
Deferred		—-		—-
		—		—
State:
Current		—-		—-
Deferred		—-		—-
		—		—
Total	$	-	$	-
Total	$	—	$	—

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, after consideration of the change in control resulting from the Armada transaction, the Company ~~had~~will have an aggregate net operating loss carryforward(s) to offset future taxable income of approximately $1260,~~275,~~000. The amount and availability of any net operating loss carryforward(s) will be subject to the limitations set forth in the Internal Revenue Code. Such factors as the number of shares ultimately issued within a three year look-back period; whether there is a deemed more than 50 percent change in control; the applicable long-term tax exempt bond rate; continuity of historical business; and subsequent income of the Company all enter into the annual computation of allowable annual utilization of any net operating loss carryforward(s).

The Company's income tax (benefit) expense for the each of the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, are as follows:

	Year ended			Year ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Statutory rate applied to income before income taxes	$	(136,000	)	$	(189,400	)
Statutory rate (34.0%) applied to income before income taxes	$	(2,095,600	)	$	(136,000	)
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
State income taxes		—			—
State income taxes non-deductible charges		-			-
Non-deductible charge for the effect of the partial conversion
Impairment of mining leases and claims and investment in Tombstone Development Corp.		1,703,300			-
of the note payable to common stock at less than “fair value”		73,600			—
Effect of the partial conversion of the note payable to common stock at less than “fair value”		277,400			73,600
Other, including reserve for deferred tax asset
Other, including reserve for deferred tax asset and application of net operating loss carryforward(s)		114,900			62,400
and application of net operating loss carryforward(s)		62,400			189,400
Income tax expense	$	-		$	-
Income tax expense	$	—		$	—

Temporary differences, consisting primarily of the prospective usage of net operating loss carryforwards give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	~~447~~88,400		$	~~385~~447,~~000~~400
Less valuation allowance		(~~447~~88,400	)		(~~385~~447,~~000~~400	)
Net Deferred Tax Asset	$	—-		$	—-

During the ~~each of the~~ years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, the valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset increased (decreased) by approximately $62(359,~~400~~000) and $~~251~~62,~~000~~400, respectively.

~~Note H~~ F- ~~Common Stock Transactions~~14

On March 23, 2016, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation stating “After giving effect to a ten for one reverse split, Article III is amended to read as follows: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is five hundred twenty five million (525,000,000) shares, of which five hundred million (500,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share, shall be designated as “Common Stock” and twenty five million (25,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share, shall be designated as “Preferred Stock.” The effect of this action is reflected in the accompanying financial statements as of the first day of the first period presented.

F-12

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note HK - Common Stock Transactions ~~- Continued~~

On February 29, 2016, the Company filed a Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission noting a pending 1 for 10 reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock; as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, and a concurrent amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation setting the authorized capital of the Company from the authorized, as adjusted, 25,000,000 ~~post-split~~postsplit shares of common stock to 500,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock and the authorized, as adjusted, 250,000 post-split shares of preferred stock to 25,000,000 shares of $0001 par value preferred stock. The time to implement the reverse split action has expired and no further action is anticipated by the Company’s Board of Directors.

On November 30, 2016, the stockholder controlling the outstanding promissory note for working capital notified the Company that he was withdrawing his suspension of the conversion clause in the promissory note for the conversion of only $150 in outstanding principal and continuing the suspension of the conversion clause for all remaining outstanding principal. This limited one-time conversion caused the issuance 0f 1,500,000 shares of common stock with a “fair value” of $217,350 resulting in a non-cash charge to operations of approximately $217,200, which is reflected as a component of interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.

~~Note~~On INovember 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of this Agreement, the Company issued into escrow 284,580,000 shares of its common stock to Armada Mining, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and/or its assigns (Armada) in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the historic Tombstone Mining District. The Agreement allows for the Company to acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. This exchange resulted in Armada owning approximately 85% of the Company, post-transaction. ~~Preferred~~Subject ~~Stock~~to financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals; by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques; and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development. The completion of the acquisition of these currently nonperforming claims/leases was initially subject to the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate financing and various regulatory approvals. On June 27, 2017, the Company completed the closing on the November 28, 2016 transaction.

~~The~~On October 22, 2017, the stockholder controlling the outstanding promissory note for working capital notified the Company isthat ~~authorized~~he towas ~~issue~~withdrawing uphis tosuspension 25of the conversion clause in the promissory note for the conversion of only $24,000 in outstanding principal and continuing the suspension of the conversion clause for all remaining outstanding principal. This limited one-time conversion caused the issuance 0f 24,000,000 shares of ~~preferred~~common stock, ~~$0.001~~with ~~par~~a “fair value~~. As~~” of ~~December 31~~$840,000 ~~2016~~resulting in a non-cash charge to operations of approximately $816,000, ~~there~~which ~~are~~is noreflected as ~~shares~~a component of ~~preferred~~operating ~~stock~~expenses ~~issued~~in ~~and~~the ~~outstanding~~accompanying financial statements.

~~Note J~~ F- ~~Subsequent Events~~15

On February 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (MDA) with L2 Capital, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company (“L2 Capital”). The MDA has several components: Under the Equity Purchase Agreement (‘Equity Line”), the Registrant has the right, but not the obligation, to sell shares of its common stock to L2 Capital at 75% of the prevailing OTC market price, as determined by the public market over time periods set out in the Equity Line, for up to $3,000,000. Under the Registration Rights Agreement (“Registration Rights”), the Registrant Is obliged to register the offering of shares to be put under the Equity Line with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-1, and certain Blue Sky regulators, so that L2 Capital may, presumably, resell such shares under our Rule 424 Prospectus. The Registrant paid a 3% capital commitment fee to L2 Capital, by issuing to it a $90,000 8% Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) The Note requires us to repay $45,000, with interest, in six (6) months, and the balance upon the effective date of the referenced Form S-1, or an additional six (6) months, whichever is earlier. Our default would trigger conversion rights in favor of L2 Capital, permitting it to demand issuance of shares at a 30% discount to market sufficient to satisfy any amounts due. Also included are share reserve requirements, under which our transfer agent, VStock Transfer, Inc., agrees to maintain a portion of our authorized but unissued shares sufficient to meet our obligations under the Equity Line and Note. The foregoing is a summary only of the terms of the MDA. Copies of the Equity Line, Registration Rights and Note are submitted herewith, and the descriptions herein are qualified entirely by reference to the express language of these documents.

Management has evaluated all other activity of the Company through the issue date of the financial statements and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the accompanying financial statements or disclosure in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-13

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(formerly MCPI, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note KL - ~~Pending~~Preferred ~~Transaction~~Stock

OnThe ~~November 28, 2016, the~~ Company ~~entered~~is ~~into~~authorized ato ~~Material~~issue ~~Definitive~~up ~~Agreement~~to ~~(Agreement) with Armada Mining~~25, ~~Inc. of Tombstone~~000, ~~Arizona, an Arizona corporation (Armada). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will issue 284,580,~~000 shares of ~~its~~preferred ~~common~~ stock ~~to Armada~~, ~~its~~$0.001 ~~affiliates, related entities and other common parties in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the Tombstone Mining District of Arizona~~par value. ~~The~~As ~~Company will acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres~~ of ~~contiguous~~December ~~mineral leases~~31, ~~including~~2017 ~~some property acquired in fee simple,~~ and ~~ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company~~2016, ~~which was formed in 1933~~respectively, ~~and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona.~~ ~~Subject~~there toare ~~the~~no ~~completion~~shares of ~~due~~preferred ~~diligence,~~stock ~~acquisition~~issued ~~of adequate financing~~ and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals, by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further developmentoutstanding.

~~Upon~~Note ~~completion~~M ~~of the terms of the Agreement, Armada will own approximately 85% of the Company’s post~~-~~transaction~~ ~~issued~~Subsequent and outstanding common stock of the Company. Armada has represented to the Company that it anticipates exchanging a portion of these shares with their existing shareholders; using a portion to satisfy existing obligations to related parties and others; and using a portion to finance other Armada operations. The Agreement anticipates that Company, post-transaction, will have new Board of Directors that will, in turn, appoint new management for the Company. Additionally, the Company and Armada have facilitated a change in the Company’s corporate name to better reflect the nature and focus of the Company’s proposed ongoing and future business interests.Events

AsManagement has evaluated all other activity of the Company through the issue date of ~~this~~the financial ~~filing~~statements and concluded that no subsequent events, ~~this~~other ~~transaction~~than ~~has~~noted ~~not~~above ~~been~~related ~~completed~~to the valuation of mining claims and, inproperties and the ~~opinion~~classification of ~~current~~capital ~~management~~acquisition commitment fees, ~~remains~~have ~~viable~~occurred that would require recognition in the accompanying financial statements or disclosure in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(Remainder of this page left blank intentionally)

(Signatures follow on next page)

F-1416

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.
Dated: April 17, 2017		/s/ John T. Bauska
Dated: August 22, 2019		/s/ John T. Bauska
		John T. Bauska
		Chief Executive Officer and Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates as indicated.

Dated: April 17, 2017		/s/ John T. Bauska
Dated: August 22, 2019		/s/ John T. Bauska
		John T. Bauska
		President, Secretary/Treasurer and Director
Dated: April 17, 2017		/s/ Dan M. Leatzow
Dated: August 22, 2019		/s/ Dan M. Leatzow
		Dan M. Leatzow
		Director
Dated: August 22, 2019		/s/ Thomas P. McGovern
		Thomas P. McGovern
		Director
Dated: August 22, 2019		/s/ Robert J. Lloyd
		Robert J. Lloyd
		Director
Dated: August 22, 2019		/s/ Dr. Ted Topolski
		Dr. Ted Topolski
		Director

2426

Filing Compare · Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.