10-K 1 anteon2005.txt ANTEON 2005 10K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ----------------------- FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO _____________ Commission File Number: 001-31258 ----------------------- ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 13-3880755 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 3211 Jermantown Road Fairfax, VA 22030-2801 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (703) 246-0200 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None ----------------------- Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes |X| No |_| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes |X| No |_| Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes |_| No |X| The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2005 was $1,547,655,535 (based on the closing price of $45.62 per share on June 30, 2005, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange- Corporate Transactions). For this computation, the registrant excluded the market value of all shares of its common stock reported as beneficially owned by named executive officers and directors of the registrant; such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an "affiliate" of the registrant. Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. There were 37,447,611 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 10, 2006. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Part III FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Form 10-K includes and incorporates by reference forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "predict," "project," "will" and similar terms and phrases, and may also include references to assumptions. These statements are contained in the sections entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Business" and other sections of this Form 10-K. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: o funded backlog; o estimated remaining contract value; o our expectations regarding the U.S. federal government's procurement budgets and reliance on outsourcing of services; o our financial condition and liquidity, as well as future cash flows and earnings, and o our ability to close the proposed merger (the "Merger") with a subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation or ("General Dynamics.") Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the following: o changes in U.S. federal government procurement and contracting laws, regulations, policies and budgets; o the number and type of contracts and task orders awarded to us; o the integration of acquisitions without disruption to our other business activities; o inability to obtain government approval of the Merger; o changes in general economic and business conditions; o technological changes; o the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; o competition; o our ability to retain our contracts during any rebidding process; and o the other factors outlined under "Risk Factors." If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected, estimated or projected. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect future events or circumstances. Item 1. Business General We are a leading provider of information technology solutions and systems engineering and integration services to government customers as measured by revenue. We design, integrate, maintain and upgrade state-of-the-art information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other high priority government missions. We also provide many of our government customers with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage their mission systems development and operations. We have broad service competencies that include strengths in intelligence systems, emergency response management, logistics modernization, secure identification and access management solutions, training, platform and weapons systems engineering support, ballistic missile defense, healthcare services and government enterprise solutions. We currently serve over 1,000 U.S. federal government customers in more than 50 government agencies, as well as state and foreign governments. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 88% of our revenues were derived from the Department of Defense, or "DOD," and intelligence agencies, and approximately 11% from civilian agencies that includes the Department of Homeland Security of the U.S. federal government. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 86% of our revenues were from contracts where we were the lead, or "prime," contractor on our projects. We provide our services under long-term contracts that have a weighted average term of 7 years, assuming the exercise of all potential contract options. Additionally, we had contracts with an estimated remaining contract value of $6.5 billion as of December 31, 2005, of which approximately $910.6 million was funded backlog. From 1996 through 2005, we increased annual revenues from $141.8 million to $1.493 billion, at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 30%. Our revenues grew organically by 15% during 2005 and 14% during 2004. We define organic growth as the increase in revenues excluding the revenues associated with acquisitions, divestitures and closures of businesses in comparable periods. On December 13, 2005, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger with General Dynamics and a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics, pursuant to which General Dynamics agreed to acquire Anteon International Corporation for approximately $2.2 billion, which includes the assumption of approximately $116 million in net debt as defined as debt less cash. Upon completion of the Merger, Anteon International Corporation will become a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics. On March 3, 2006, we held a special meeting of stockholders at which the stockholders adopted the Merger agreement and approved the Merger. Completion of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"). Other than approval pursuant to the HSR Act, no other material federal or state regulatory approvals are required to be obtained by us, General Dynamics or its wholly owned subsidiary in connection with the Merger. We anticipate that the transaction will close no later than the end of the second quarter of 2006. The merger agreement may be terminated prior to the effective time of the Merger, under certain circumstances discussed in the merger agreement. In this document, unless otherwise indicated, "we" or the "Company" refers to Anteon International Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries. The U.S. Federal Government Technology Services Market The U.S. federal government is the largest single customer for information technology solutions and systems engineering services in the United States. It is anticipated that technology services spending will grow in the areas emphasized by the U.S. government's evolving military strategy, including homeland security, missile defense, information security, logistics management, systems modernization, improvements of weapon systems design and military personnel training. Defense spending is projected to exceed $410.8 billion in government fiscal year 2006, a 3% increase over government fiscal year 2005. An additional $125.8 billion in supplemental funding, that includes the Global War on Terror, has been submitted to Congress for approval would bring the total defense spending for fiscal year 2006 to over $536.6 billion. The President's proposed budget for government fiscal year 2007 includes defense spending of $439.3 billion, a 7% increase over government fiscal year 2006, if adopted, would be the largest Department of Defense budget in history in actual dollars. The 2007 spending plan submitted to Congress would include an estimated 2% to 4% annual increase in the peacetime defense budget over the fiscal years 2008 through 2011. Government Contracts and Contracting The federal technology services procurement environment has evolved in recent years due to statutory and regulatory changes resulting from procurement reform initiatives. U.S. federal government agencies traditionally have procured technology solutions and services through agency-specific contracts awarded to a single contractor. However, the number of procurement contracting methods available to U.S. federal government customers for services procurements has increased substantially. Today, there are three predominant contracting methods through which government agencies procure technology services: traditional single award contracts, General Service Administration, or "GSA," Schedule contracts, and single and multiple awards Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, or "ID/IQ," contracts. Traditional single award contracts specify the scope of services that will be delivered and the contractor that will provide the specified services. These contracts have been the traditional method for procurement by the U.S. federal government. When an agency has a requirement, interested contractors are solicited, qualified, and then provided with a request for a proposal. The process of qualification, request for proposals and evaluation of bids requires the agency to maintain a large, professional procurement staff and can take a year or more to complete. GSA Schedule contracts are listings of services, products and prices of contractors maintained by the GSA for use throughout the U.S. federal government. In order for a company to provide services under a GSA Schedule contract, the company must be pre-qualified and awarded a contract by GSA. When an agency uses a GSA Schedule contract to meet its requirements, the agency, or the GSA on behalf of the agency, conducts the procurement. The user agency, or the GSA on its behalf, evaluates the user agency's services requirements and initiates a competition limited to GSA Schedule qualified contractors. Use of GSA Schedule contracts is expected to provide the user agency with reduced procurement time and lower procurement costs. Single and multiple award ID/IQ contracts are contract forms through which the U.S. federal government creates preferred provider relationships with contractors. These umbrella contracts outline the basic terms and conditions under which the government may order services. An umbrella contract typically is managed by one agency, the sponsoring agency, and is available for use by any agency of the U.S. federal government. The umbrella contracts are competed within the industry and one or more contractors are awarded contracts to be qualified to perform the work. The competitive process for procurement of work to be performed under the contract, called task orders, is limited to the pre-selected contractor(s). If the ID/IQ contract has a single prime contractor, the award of task orders is limited to that single party. If the contract has multiple prime contractors, the award of the task order is competitively determined. Multiple-contractor ID/IQ contracts that are open for any government agency to use for the procurement of services are commonly referred to as Government Wide Acquisition Contracts, or "GWAC." Due to the lower cost, reduced procurement time, and increased flexibility of GWACs, there has been greater use of GWACs among many agencies for large-scale procurements of technology services. Key Factors Driving Growth There are several key factors which we believe will continue to drive the growth of the U.S. federal technology services market and our business: o Continued Trend Towards Outsourcing. The downsizing of the U.S. federal government workforce, declining availability of information technology management skills among government personnel, and a corresponding growth in the backlog of software maintenance tasks at many government agencies are contributing to an increase in technology outsourcing. According to the Office of Management and Budget, spending on outsourced information technology solutions is projected to grow at a rate substantially faster than overall U.S. federal government information technology expenditures. In government fiscal year 2004, 83% of the U.S. federal government's total information technology solutions spending flowed to contractors. By government fiscal year 2010, this rate of outsourcing is projected to increase to 86% of total information technology spending. o Government Efficiency Initiatives. Political pressures and budgetary constraints are forcing government agencies to improve their processes and services and to operate in a manner more consistent with commercial enterprises. To meet these challenges, government agencies are investing heavily in information technology to improve effectiveness, enhance productivity and deliver new services. o Continued Dependence on Commercial Off-the-Shelf Hardware and Software. The U.S. federal government has increased its use of lower cost, open architecture systems using commercial off-the-shelf, or "COTS," hardware and software, which are rapidly displacing the single purpose, custom systems historically favored by the U.S. federal government. The need for COTS products and COTS integration services is expected to increase as the government seeks to ensure the future compatibility of its systems across agencies. In addition, the continued shortening of software upgrade cycles is expected to increase the demand for the integration of new COTS products. o Increased Spending on National Defense. National defense spending is projected to grow substantially over the next five years with the U.S. federal government increasing its commitment to strengthen the nation's security, defense and intelligence capabilities. The U.S. federal government is investing in improved homeland security, greater information systems security, more effective intelligence operations, and new approaches to warfare simulation training. Defense spending is projected to exceed $410.8 billion in government fiscal year 2006, an increase of almost 3% over government fiscal year 2005. An additional $125.8 billion in supplemental funding, that includes the Global War on Terror, has been submitted to Congress for approval would bring the total defense spending for fiscal year 2006 to over $536.6 billion. The President's proposed budget for 2007 defense spending is $439.3 billion, a 7% increase over the government fiscal year 2006 budget and, if adopted, would be the largest defense budget in history in actual dollars. o Emphasis on System Modernization. To balance the costs of new initiatives like homeland security with the costs of ongoing military operations, the Department of Defense is emphasizing upgrading existing platforms to next generation technologies rather than procuring completely new systems. For example, rather than replace an entire generation of aircraft and ships, the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Navy have decided to invest in upgrades, using the latest information technology and weapons systems. To accomplish this in an environment of military personnel reductions, the armed services are increasingly dependent on highly skilled contractors that can provide the full spectrum of services needed to support modernization activities. o Continuing Impact of Procurement Reform. Recent changes in U.S. federal procurement regulations have incorporated commercial buying practices, including preferred supplier relationships in the form of GWACs, into the government's procurement process. These changes have produced lower acquisition costs, faster acquisition cycles, more flexible contract terms, and more stable supplier/customer relationships. U.S. federal expenditures through GWACs have grown significantly over the past three years, and the estimated growth in Schedule contracts will average approximately 13% over the next three years. Our Capabilities and Services We are a leading provider of information technology solutions to government customers. We design, integrate, maintain and upgrade state-of-the art information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other high priority government missions. As a total solutions provider, we maintain the comprehensive information technology skills necessary to support the entire lifecycle of our customers' systems, from conceptual development through operational support. We provide requirements definition and analysis, process design or re-engineering, systems engineering and design, networking and communications design, COTS hardware and software evaluation and procurement, custom software and middleware development, system integration and testing, and software maintenance and training services. Depending upon customer needs, we may provide total system solutions employing our full set of skills on a single project, or we may provide more targeted, or "bundled," services designed to meet the customer's specific requirements. For example, we built, and continuously maintain and upgrade, the National Emergency Management Information System, or "NEMIS," an enterprise-wide management information system, for the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency, or "FEMA." This system has been procured in three phases: system definition and design, base system development and deployment, and upgrades to incorporate current web technology. We also are a leading provider of systems engineering and integration services to government customers, primarily within the defense community. We provide these defense customers with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage the continuing development of their mission systems, including ships, aircraft, weapons and communications systems. As a solutions provider in this market, we also maintain the comprehensive skills to manage the customer's system lifecycle. We provide mission area and threat analyses, research and development management, systems engineering and design acquisition management, systems integration and testing, operations concept planning, systems maintenance and training. For example, we provide threat analysis, operations concept planning and systems integration and testing for certain U.S. Navy systems, including the radar, missile and command and control systems, employed to protect its fleet from ballistic missile attack. Like information technology solutions, these skills may be procured as a comprehensive mission solution, or they may be procured as specially prescribed tasks. Our Service Competencies and Program Examples The key to our success in both our information technology solutions and systems engineering services businesses is a combination of in-depth customer and mission knowledge, or domain expertise, and comprehensive technical skills. We believe this combination provides long-term, sustainable competitive advantage, performance excellence and customer satisfaction. Accordingly, we have focused our growth strategy on several business areas where the mix of our domain expertise and our end-to-end technical skills provides us with a strong competitive advantage and the opportunity to cross-sell our solutions and services. The following paragraphs briefly describe our service competencies in our information technology and systems engineering and integration services businesses, and provide examples of selected programs in which we utilize these competencies. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS Intelligence Systems. We have more than ten years of experience in designing, developing and operating information systems used for intelligence missions. These missions focus on data and imagery collection, as well as information analysis and dissemination of information to the battlefield. An example of our work in this area includes: o Coalition Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System CENTRIXS and CENTRIXS N.A.T.O. Since 1993, we have provided services to the U.S., N.A.T.O., and other allied military forces with near-real-time correlated situation and order of battle information for threat analysis, target recommendations, indications and warnings. CENTRIXS is one of the most widely-used command, control, computers, communication and intelligence systems within the international intelligence community. We provide systems engineering and technical assistance, software development, configuration management, operational support and user training. This program recently has been expanded to include the deployment of new systems to Central Asia and additional system deployments to the coalition countries in the war on terrorism and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Emergency Response Management. We have unique experience in developing information technology systems to support emergency response management requirements. Our expertise includes large-scale system design, development, testing, implementation, training and operational support. Our work in this area includes: o National Emergency Management Information System. Since early 1996, we have supported the development of the NEMIS system for FEMA through a series of contracts and task orders. We believe our support to FEMA will continue to grow with FEMA's increased responsibility as a first responder to disasters and terrorist attacks and as FEMA supports its mission within DHS. NEMIS provides mission critical functionality for FEMA's core mission of disaster response and recovery. This enterprise-wide management information system connects several thousand desktop and mobile terminals/handsets, providing FEMA with a fully mobile, nationwide, rapid response disaster assessment and mitigation system. We continue to provide enhancements to the current system, and we are in the process of expanding our support to this mission area to include an internet-based capability that will integrate with the DHS technology infrastructure. Logistics Modernization. We provide a wide range of logistics management information technology solutions, including process design and re-engineering, technology demonstrations, proof-of-concept systems development, new systems development and existing systems upgrades. Our working logistics modernization includes: o Joint Logistics Warfighting Initiative or "JLWI." Since March 2000, we have been providing process re-engineering system design, and database integration as we conduct a variety of customer directed process and technology experiments and demonstrations on the Joint Logistics Warfighting Initiative contract. JLWI represents the DOD's efforts focused on facilitating the military's logistics transformation and improving military readiness through business process improvements and the implementation of new and emerging technologies. We have developed a proof-of-concept for web enabling the military's legacy logistics systems in order to provide real-time visibility of logistics information on the battlefield, or the "JLWI Shared Data Environment." Third party independent validation and verification of the JLWI Shared Data Environment reflects that it has already gained significant support through its use by units in the U.S. and in overseas locations like Afghanistan and Kuwait. Government Enterprise Solutions. Our supply chain management, software engineering and integration experience allows us to develop large-scale e-commerce applications tailored for the specific needs of the U.S. federal government environment. These applications provide end-users with significantly decreased transaction costs, increased accuracy, reduced cycle times, item price savings, real-time order status and visibility of spending patterns. o U.S. Postal Service E-Buy System. We have been providing lifecycle information technology services to the U.S. Postal Service since 1983. We have developed and implemented an electronic commerce application to serve an estimated 80,000 to 100,000 U.S. Postal Service employees who purchase a wide range of products on the U.S. Postal Service intranet web site. Pre-negotiated supplier catalogs are hosted on an intranet for security and performance. Web-based purchasing provides catalog management capability, multi-catalog searching, self-service ordering, workflow and approval processing and other status and receiving functions. Fulfilling the U.S. Postal Service's requirement to serve up to 100,000 employees required the development of a very robust transaction processing application. o Joint and Service Enterprise Information Technology Support. We have been providing Enterprise Information Technology support for numerous Joint and Service Commands, or the "Commands," for the past decade, both in the U.S. and in numerous locations abroad. Our support comprises all functions of the Enterprise, including telecommunications engineering, planning and operation, network development, administration and management, software life-cycle support, and business process engineering. Our employees deploy with the Commands during both peacetime operations and war and are making vital contributions to the Commands' capabilities to accomplish their missions. The supported Commands include U.S. Central Command and its Army, Third U.S. Army/ARCENT, and the U.S. Air Force, 9th U.S. Air Force/CENTAF, component commands, U.S. Army Forces Command, the U.S. Army Reserve Command, and the U.S. Army Network Engineering and Technology Command. o Coalition, Joint and Service Training Exercise Support Commands. We have been providing mission Exercise Program Support from the individual unit to multi-national coalition level. We plan events that prepare commanders and their staff to measure training proficiency, correct deficiencies, and prepare for wartime missions. We are adept at planning, implementing, and critiquing all aspects of these events to include augmentation with senior mentor and subject matter experts. We have planned every facet of the events to include logistical support, communications system planning and provisioning, and other support functions. These exercises have played a major part in preparation of United States and Coalition Forces to meet the global war on terrorism, and Operation Iraqi Freedom and DHS missions. Modeling, Simulation and Training. We provide a comprehensive set of information technology solutions and services to our customers, including computer-based training, web-based training, distant learning, interactive electronic technical manuals, performance support systems and organizational assessment methods. We provide service to the following programs: o Program Executive Office Simulation Training and Instrumentation, or "PEO STRI." Since January 2000, we have provided life cycle support for constructive training at fourteen U.S. Army Simulation and Training Command Simulation centers worldwide. We have more than 1,300 personnel supporting this program at more than 80 sites throughout the United States, Germany, Italy and South Korea. We provide exercise support for computer-driven and manual battle simulations, including planning, coordination, personnel support, instructional aid development, simulation training, database and scenario development and system integrity. We support a variety of mission specific simulations, providing highly qualified professionals who are certified in all aspects of simulation support, to each of the U.S. Army's Battle Simulation Centers. o Military Operations on Urban Terrain, or "MOUT." We have supported the U.S. Army's MOUT program since July 1997. Our support to MOUT primarily focuses on the design and instrumentation of the most advanced MOUT site in the world located at the Joint Readiness Training Center, Fort Polk, LA, as well as other sites worldwide. The site allows trainers to continuously observe, control, monitor and record the conduct of training. The system captures every second of a training exercise through the use of nearly 1,000 cameras tied together via a fiber optic backbone and high-speed local area network to the control room. The system is also designed to control targetry and multiple battlefield effects and has the flexibility to support both simulated fire and live fire exercises. We have also developed a mobile version of MOUT to facilitate training in the theater of operation. For example, two Mobile MOUT sites were ordered and delivered for use in Kuwait and Afghanistan in early 2003 to support operations in the global war on terrorism. During 2004, we delivered a Mobile MOUT site to the U.S. National Guard. In 2005, we delivered 12 Mobile MOUT sites. Secure Identification and Access Management Solutions. Our position in this market provides us with capabilities in optical memory card technology, which is used primarily for high-capacity portable secure data storage and authentication through multiple biometrics. This capability, combined with our expertise in integrated circuit card technology, which is used primarily for access control and related transaction processing, positions us to capitalize on the growing demand in this market. Both of the secure identification and access control technologies are gaining significant and increased support with U.S. federal agencies, including the DOD, DHS and foreign governments. o Integrated Card Production System. We are the prime contractor for secure identification and border control card solutions for the DHS's Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, or "BCIS." Through a contract with the BCIS, we provide the Permanent Resident Card solution, as well as the Department of State Border Crossing "LaserVisa" Card solution. To date, the U.S. federal government has ordered over 26 million secure identification cards through this contract. We are positioned to grow from the expanding budget of DHS, as secure identification and credential card technologies proliferate within DHS and other U.S. federal government agencies. Healthcare Services. We deliver information technology solutions in healthcare programs for the Department of Defense, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Marine Corps. Our support for medical research includes statistical analysis, data mining of complex medical databases and health surveillance. Our solutions for patient care include diagnostics, image processing, and medical records management. o U.S. Army Medical Department. We provide technical, scientific, and administrative support to the Office of the Surgeon General, the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command and the U.S. Army Medical Command and its subordinate activities, laboratories and medical facilities. We have been providing this support since 1989 under several contracts. We support the research, development, acquisition and/or fielding of medical equipment and supplies, drugs, vaccines, diagnostics and advanced information technology. We assist with policy development and implementation, strategic planning, decision-making, information systems design and development, information management, studies and analyses, logistics planning and medical research. These services entered into areas of homeland security, domestic medical preparedness and Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear Defense programs. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES Platform and Weapons Systems Engineering Support. We have more than 10 years experience in providing critical systems engineering and technology management services in support of defense platform and weapon systems programs. Our experience encompasses systems engineering and development, mission and threat analysis and acquisition management for the majority of U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force weapon systems. We provide core systems engineering disciplines in support of most major surface ship and submarine programs as well as virtually all U.S. Air Force weapon systems. o Secretary of the Air Force Technical and Analytical Support, or "SAFTAS." In December 2000, we entered into a 15-year contract with the U.S. Air Force to provide technical and analytical support to the Headquarters Air Force and Secretary of the Air Force organizations. The contract includes support to the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office, the Under Secretary for Space, and all of the Program Executive Offices which oversee all aircraft, munitions, space and Command, Control, Computer, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance systems. We provide program, budgetary, policy and legislative analysis, information technology services, systems engineering and technical management services for all major U.S. Air Force acquisition programs. We believe that this program, as well as similar programs for the U.S. Navy, will continue to experience growth as the Department of Defense plans for billions of dollars of system upgrades over the next decade. o Shipbuilding Engineering Support. For over twenty years, we have provided acquisition management and engineering support to the U.S. Navy's shipbuilding program offices. Today, this includes the AEGIS shipbuilding program, aircraft carrier program, all submarine programs and developmental programs such as the new DDX destroyer and the Littoral Combatant Ship. We also develop software serving the global ship design industry. In addition to support for customer acquisition offices and industry, we provide support for the ships during the in-service phase of their life cycle through multiple contracts. This includes installation support, refurbishment of equipment and provision of new software. o Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Support. We support various DOD laboratories and field activities in the provision of technology, testing, operation of facilities and general research and development, or "R&D," support. Our technologies range from the provision of advanced algorithms for the Virginia class submarines, software for decision support systems, video compression algorithms, advanced sonar concepts and unique software for technology assessment. We operate the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's Laser Facilities and conduct material testing on their behalf. Ballistic Missile Defense. We have more than a decade of experience in ballistic missile defense programs. We provide long-range planning, threat assessment, systems engineering and integration, acquisition support services and program management services. o Theater-Wide Ballistic Missile Defense or "TBMD." Since January 1999, we have supported the U.S. Navy by providing management, systems engineering and technical support to the TBMD program. We provide a broad range of support to develop, test, evaluate, and produce the U.S. Navy's future ballistic missile defense systems. Due to our U.S. Navy TBMD System experience, we were selected to provide similar support to the National Missile Defense program. We believe ballistic missile programs will experience near-and-long-term growth as the DOD moves forward to meet the U.S. federal government's mandate for a national missile defense system. Our Growth Strategy Our goal is to become the first pure-play technology services company to be included in the top tier of government technology service providers. Our strategy to achieve this objective includes the following: o Continue to Increase Market Penetration. The U.S. federal government's continued movement towards using significantly larger, more comprehensive contracts, such as GWACs, has favored companies with a broad range of technical capabilities and proven track records. As a prime contractor on three of the four largest GWACs for information technology services based on overall contract ceiling value, we have benefited from these changes. We will continue to expand our role with current customers on existing programs while also pursuing new opportunities only available through these larger contracts. o Capitalize on Increased Emphasis on Information Security, Homeland Security and Intelligence. Excluding supplemental funding, defense spending is projected to exceed $410.8 billion in government fiscal year 2006, an increase of almost 3% over government fiscal year 2005, and is expected to reach $439.3 billion in government fiscal year 2007, a 7% increase over projected government fiscal year 2006 spending. We believe that many of the key operational goals of the U.S. federal government correlate with our expertise, including developing a national missile defense system, increasing homeland security, protecting information systems from attack, conducting effective intelligence homeland security, protecting information systems from attack, conducting effective intelligence operations, and training for new approaches to warfare through simulation. o Capitalize on Growing Demand in the Secure Identification and Access Management Solutions Market. The use of credential card technologies for secure identification and access control solutions is rapidly gaining momentum with U.S. federal agencies, the DOD and foreign governments. These cards are used for cardholder authentication, physical access control and logical access control. Our position in this market provides us with a full range of capabilities to meet our customers' requirements. We have extensive experience with optical storage card technology, which is used primarily for authentication using biometrics and physical access control. This capability, combined with our expertise in integrated circuit card technology, used primarily for logical access control, uniquely positions us to capitalize on the growing demand in this market regardless of the application or credential card technology selected by customers. o Cross-Sell our Full Range of Services to Existing Customers. We plan to continue expanding the scope of existing customer relationships by marketing and delivering the full range of our capabilities to each customer. Having developed a high level of customer satisfaction and critical domain knowledge as the incumbent on many long-term contracts, we have a unique advantage and opportunity to cross-sell our services and capture additional contract opportunities. For example, we believe our strong performance record and detailed understanding of customer requirements developed on the U.S. Air Force Cargo Movement Operations System led directly to our being awarded a contract relating to the Joint Logistics Warfighting Initiative. o Continue our Disciplined Acquisition Strategy. We employ a disciplined methodology to evaluate and select acquisition candidates. We have completed nine strategic acquisitions since 1997. Our industry remains highly fragmented and we believe the changing government procurement environment will continue to provide additional opportunities for industry consolidation. We will continue to selectively review acquisition candidates with complementary skills or market focus. History and Organization In April 1996, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of our predecessor corporation, Anteon International Corporation (then known as Ogden Professional Services Corporation), a Virginia corporation, which we refer to in this filing as "Anteon Virginia." In connection with the acquisition we changed the name of Anteon Virginia to Anteon Corporation. Anteon Virginia then acquired several companies and businesses, including Techmatics, Inc. On January 1, 2001, Anteon Virginia was renamed Anteon International Corporation and transferred most of its operations into Techmatics, which became its principal operating subsidiary, and was in turn renamed Anteon Corporation. As a result, we then owned approximately 99% of Anteon Virginia and Anteon Virginia owned 100% of Anteon Corporation (formerly Techmatics). On March 15, 2002, we entered into certain reorganization transactions in connection with our initial public offering, including the merger of Anteon Virginia into us. Following the merger, the name "Anteon International Corporation" is borne solely by a single Delaware corporation, which is the direct 100% parent company of Anteon Corporation (formerly Techmatics). Acquisitions We employ a highly disciplined methodology to evaluate acquisitions. Since 1997 we have evaluated several hundred targets and have successfully completed and integrated nine strategic acquisitions. Each of these acquired businesses has been accretive to earnings, added to our technical capabilities and expanded our customer reach. The acquired businesses and their roles within our service offerings are summarized in the table below.

(1) Consolidated revenue of acquired business for its most recently completed fiscal year ended prior to the acquisition date. In August 1997, we purchased Vector Data Systems, Inc., a supplier of specialized information systems and services for the collection, analysis and distribution of military intelligence data. In May 1998, we acquired Techmatics, Inc., an established provider of systems engineering and program management services for large-scale military system development, including the U.S. Navy's surface ship fleet, on-ship combat systems and missile defense programs. With the acquisition of Analysis & Technology, Inc., or "A&T," in June 1999, we expanded our customer base for systems engineering and program management services to the U.S. Navy's undersea systems and added important technical expertise in computer-based training, modeling, simulation and advanced signal processing. In October 2000, we purchased Sherikon, Inc., or "Sherikon," extending the reach of our information technology solutions to military healthcare delivery systems. In July 2001, we acquired the training division of SIGCOM, Inc. and increased the range of our information technology-enabled training solutions to include the realistic simulation of urban environments for the planning and preparation of overseas military operations. In May 2003, we purchased Information Spectrum, Inc., or "ISI," a provider of secure identification and access management solutions and military logistics and training to primarily the Department of Defense. In July 2004, we purchased Simulation Technologies, Inc., or "STI," a provider of modeling and simulation software solutions and services. In August 2004, we purchased Integrated Management Services, Inc., or "IMSI," a provider of information security and assurance services, infrastructure security and enterprise IT architecture. In October 2005, we purchased Milestone Group, LLC, or "Milestone," a provider of enterprise architecture and systems, information assurance and program and financial management. Existing Contract Profiles We currently have a portfolio of more than 800 active contracts. Our contract mix for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 41% time and materials contracts, 37% cost-plus contracts and 22% fixed price contracts (a substantial majority of which were firm fixed price level of effort). Under a time and materials contract, the contractor is paid a fixed hourly rate for each direct labor hour expended and is reimbursed for direct costs. To the extent that actual labor hour costs vary significantly from the negotiated rates under a time and materials contract, we may generate more or less than the targeted amount of profit. Cost-plus contracts provide for reimbursement of allowable costs and the payment of a fee which is the contractor's profit. Cost-plus fixed fee contracts specify the contract fee in dollars or as a percentage of allowable costs. Cost-plus incentive fee and cost-plus award fee contracts provide for increases or decreases in the contract fee, within specified limits, based upon actual results as compared to contractual targets for factors such as cost, quality, schedule and performance. Under a fixed price contract, the contractor agrees to perform the specified work for a firm fixed price. To the extent that actual costs vary from the price negotiated we may generate more or less than the targeted amount of profit or even incur a loss. We generally do not pursue fixed price software development work that may create material financial risk. We do, however, execute fixed price labor hour and fixed price level of effort contracts which represent similar levels of risk as time and materials contracts. The substantial majority of our fixed price contracts involve a defined number of hours or a defined category of personnel. We refer to such contracts as "level of effort" contracts. Fixed price percentages in the table below include predominantly fixed price labor hour and fixed price level of effort contracts. Our historical contract mix is summarized in the table below.

Our contract mix changes from year to year depending on the contract mix of companies we acquire, as well as our efforts to obtain more time and materials and fixed price work. As a result of recent acquisitions, our contract mix has been more weighted towards cost-plus contracts. In addition to a wide range of single award contracts with defense, civil, state and local government customers, we also hold a number of multiple award omnibus contracts and GWACs that currently support more than 4,300 separate task orders. Our Stricom task order under the ANSWER contract accounted for approximately 11% of our revenues in 2005. No other individual task order accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. Government Wide Acquisition Contracts. We are one of the leading suppliers of information technology services under GWACs, and a prime contractor for three of the four largest GWACs for information technology services and a subcontractor for the one that we are not the prime. These contract vehicles are available to any government customer and provide a faster, more-effective means of procuring contract services. For example, in December 1998, we were awarded Applications and Support for Widely-diverse EndUser Requirements, or "ANSWER," a 10-year multiple award contract with the GSA to provide highly technical information technology and systems engineering program support and infrastructure management. We have been awarded over 500 task orders to date under ANSWER, with revenues of approximately $240.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Currently, our total estimated remaining contract value for this contract is approximately $1.4 billion through December 2010. Listed below are the four largest GWACs for information technology services as measured by overall contract ceiling value.

Listed below are our top ten programs by 2005 revenue, including single award and multiple award contracts. We are a prime contractor on each of these programs.

Subcontractors In fulfilling our contract obligations to customers, we may utilize the services of one or more subcontractors. The use of subcontractors to support bidding for and the subsequent performance of awarded contacts is a customary aspect of U.S. federal government contracting. Subcontractors may be tasked by us with performing work elements of the contract similar to or different from those performed by us or other subcontractors. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 32% of our total direct costs resulted from work performed by subcontractors. As discussed further in "Risk Factors," if our subcontractors fail to satisfy their contractual obligations, our prime contract performance could be materially and adversely affected. To the extent subcontractor costs increase or decrease in the future, our operating profit margin percentage on contracts could be affected. Estimated Remaining Contract Value and New Business Development On December 31, 2005, our estimated remaining contract value was $6.5 billion, of which $910.6 million was funded backlog. In determining estimated remaining contract value, we do not include any provision for an increased level of work likely to be awarded under our GWACs. The estimated remaining contract value is calculated based on our current revenue run rate over the remaining term of the contract. Our estimated remaining contract value consists of funded backlog which is based upon amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment of goods and services and unfunded contract value which is based upon management's estimate of the future potential of our existing contracts to generate revenues for us. These estimates are based on our experience under such contracts and similar contracts, and we believe such estimates to be reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that the unfunded contract value will be realized as contract revenue or earnings. In addition, almost all of the contracts included in estimated remaining contract value are subject to termination at the election of the customer.

From December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2005, our estimated remaining contract value increased at a 21% compound annual growth rate, including the effect of acquisitions. We believe this growth demonstrates the effectiveness of the two-tiered business development process that management has developed to respond to the strategic and tactical opportunities arising from the evolving government procurement environment. New task order contract vehicles and major high-profile programs are designated strategic opportunities, and their pursuit and execution are managed centrally. A core team comprised of senior management and our strategic business unit heads makes all opportunity selection and resource allocation decisions. Work that can be performed under our many existing task order contract vehicles is designated a tactical opportunity, which is then managed and performed at the business unit level with support as needed from other company resources. All managers and senior technical personnel are encouraged to source new work, and incentives are weighted to ensure corporate objectives are given primary consideration. Customers We provide information technology and systems engineering solutions to a highly diverse group of U.S. federal, state, local and international government organizations worldwide. Domestically, we service more than 50 agencies, bureaus and divisions of the U.S. federal government, including nearly all cabinet-level agencies and all branches of the military. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the U.S. federal government accounted for approximately 99% of our total revenues. International and state and local governments provided the remaining 1%. The DOD and intelligence agencies accounted for approximately 88% of our total revenues and services to U.S. federal civilian organizations that includes the Department of Homeland Security were approximately 11%. Our largest customer group is the U.S. Navy, which accounted for approximately 38% of revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005. An account receivable from a U.S. federal government agency enjoys the overall credit worthiness of the U.S. federal government, even though each such agency has its own budget. Pursuant to the Prompt Payment Act of 1982, payments from government agencies must be made within 30 days of final invoice acceptance or interest must be paid. Competition The federal information technology and systems engineering services industries are comprised of a large number of enterprises ranging from small, niche-oriented companies to multi-billion dollar corporations with a major presence throughout the U.S. federal government. Because of the diverse requirements of U.S. federal government customers and the highly competitive nature of large U.S. federal contracting initiatives, corporations frequently form teams to pursue contract opportunities. Prime contractors leading large proposal efforts select team members on the basis of their relevant capabilities and experience particular to each opportunity. As a result of these circumstances, companies that are competitors for one opportunity may be team members for another opportunity. We frequently compete against well-known firms in our industry as a prime contractor. Obtaining a position as either a prime contractor or subcontractor on government-wide contracting vehicles is only the first step to ensuring a secure competitive position. Competition then takes place at the task order level, where knowledge of the customer and its procurement requirements and environment are keys to winning the business. We have been successful in ensuring our presence on GWACs and GSA Schedule contracts, and in competing for work under those contracts. Through the variety of contractual vehicles at our disposal, as either a prime contractor or subcontractor, we have the ability to market our services to any federal agency. Because of our extensive experience in providing services to a diverse array of federal departments and agencies, we have first-hand knowledge of our customers and their goals, problems and challenges. We believe this knowledge gives us a competitive advantage in competing for tasks and positions us well for future growth. Employees As of December 31, 2005, we employed approximately 9,500 employees, 88% of whom were directly billable and 67% of whom held security clearances. Our workforce is well educated and experienced in the defense and intelligence sectors. Functional areas of expertise include systems engineering, computer science, business process reengineering, logistics, transportation, materials technologies, avionics and finance and acquisition management. None of our employees are represented by collective bargaining agreements. Available Information Our internet address is www.anteon.com. We make available free of charge through our internet site, via a hyperlink to the 10KWizard.com web site, our annual reports on Form 10-K; quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; current reports on Form 8-K; and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the "Exchange Act," as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Item 1A. Risk Factors Risks related to our business Business Uncertainties and Contractual Restrictions While the Merger with General Dynamics is Pending Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees, partners, regulators and customers may have an adverse effect on our business. These uncertainties may impair our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Merger is consummated, and could cause customers and others that deal with us to defer purchases or other decisions concerning us, or seek to change existing business relationships with us. In addition, the Merger agreement restricts us from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions without General Dynamics' approval. These restrictions could prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the Merger. Failure to Complete the Merger Could Negatively Impact Stock Price, Future Business and Financial Results-- Although our stockholders have voted to approve and adopt the Merger with General Dynamics, there is no other assurance that the other conditions to the completion of the Merger that remain will be satisfied. If the Merger is not completed, we will be subject to several risks, including the following: o we may be required to pay General Dynamics a termination fee of $42.5 million plus up to $500,000 in expenses if the Merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances; o the current market price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that the Merger will occur, and a failure to complete the Merger could result in a negative perception by the stock market of us generally, resulting in a decline in the market price of our common stock; o certain costs relating to the Merger (such as legal, accounting and financial advisory fees) are payable by us whether or not the Merger is completed; o there may be substantial disruption to our business and a distraction to our management and employees from day-to-day operations, because of matters related to the Merger (including integration planning) that may require substantial commitments of time and resources, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that could have been beneficial to us; o our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to retain key employees or attract qualified replacements; and o we would continue to face the risks that we currently face as an independent company. U.S. Federal Government Contracting Risks--Our business could be adversely affected by significant changes in the contracting or fiscal policies of the U.S. federal government. We derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the U.S. federal government and subcontracts under U.S. federal government prime contracts, and we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in U.S. federal government programs. Accordingly, changes in U.S. federal government contracting policies could directly affect our financial performance. Among the factors that could materially adversely affect our U.S. federal government contracting business are: o budgetary constraints affecting U.S. federal government spending generally, or specific departments or agencies in particular, and changes in fiscal policies or available funding; o changes in U.S. federal government programs or requirements; o curtailment of the U.S. federal government's use of technology services firms; o the adoption of new laws or regulations; o technological developments; o U.S. federal governmental shutdowns and other potential delays in the government appropriations process; o delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices due to problems with, or upgrades to, government information systems, or for other reasons; o competition and consolidation in the information technology industry; and o general economic conditions. These or other factors could cause U.S. federal governmental agencies, or prime contractors where we are acting as a subcontractor, to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts or not to exercise options to renew contracts, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. Many of our U.S. federal government customers are subject to stringent budgetary constraints. We have substantial contracts in place with many U.S. federal departments and agencies, and our continued performance under these contracts, or award of additional contracts from these agencies, could be materially adversely affected by spending reductions or budget cutbacks at these agencies. Early Termination of Contracts-- Our U.S. federal government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time prior to their completion, and if we do not replace them, our operating results may be harmed. We derive substantially all of our revenues from U.S. federal government contracts and subcontracts under U.S. federal government prime contracts that typically are awarded through competitive processes and span one or more base years and one or more option years. The option periods typically cover more than half of the contract's potential duration. U.S. federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods. In addition, our contracts typically also contain provisions permitting a government customer to terminate the contract on short notice, with or without cause. A decision not to exercise option periods or to terminate contracts would reduce the profitability of these contracts to us. Upon contract expiration, if the customer requires further services of the type provided by the contract, there is frequently a competitive rebidding process and there can be no assurance that we will win any particular bid, or that we will be able to replace business lost upon expiration or completion of a contract. The unexpected termination of one or more of our significant contracts could result in significant revenue shortfalls. The termination or nonrenewal of any of our significant contracts, short-term revenue shortfalls, the imposition of fines or damages or our suspension or debarment from bidding on additional contracts could harm operating results for those periods. Most U.S. federal government contract awards are subject to protest by competitors. If specified legal requirements are satisfied, these protests require the U.S. federal agency to suspend the contractor's performance of the newly awarded contract pending the outcome of the protest. These protests could also result in a requirement to resubmit bids for the contract or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract. Contracts Subject to Audit--Our business could be adversely affected by a negative audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. We could be required to reimburse the U.S. federal government for costs that we have expended on our contracts and our ability to compete successfully for future contracts could be materially impaired. The Defense Contract Audit Agency, or the "DCAA," and other government agencies routinely audit and investigate government contracts. These agencies review a contractor's performance on its contract, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and a contractor's compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor's purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, while such costs already reimbursed must be refunded. Therefore, a DCAA audit could materially affect our competitive position and result in a substantial adjustment to our revenues. If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with the U.S. federal government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us. If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the U.S. federal government generally, or any significant agency in the intelligence community or Department of Defense, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies were impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our operating results would be materially harmed. Contract Types and Risks--Our estimates of the time, resources and expenses required to complete our contractual commitments may not be accurate. We enter into three principal types of contracts with the U.S. federal government: time and materials, cost-plus, and fixed price. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 41% were time and materials, 37% of our U.S. federal contracts were cost-plus, and 22% were fixed price (a substantial majority of which were fixed price level of effort contracts, which have lower risk than other types of fixed price contracts). Under time and materials contracts, we are paid for labor at negotiated hourly billing rates and for certain expenses. There is financial risk to us should our costs to perform time and materials contracts exceed the negotiated hourly billing rates. Under cost-plus type contracts, which are subject to a contract ceiling amount, we are reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance based. However, if our costs exceed the contract ceiling, funding has not been received or costs are not allowable under the provisions of the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to obtain reimbursement for all such costs. Under fixed price contracts, we are required to perform the contract tasks at a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur, and consequently, any costs in excess of the fixed price are absorbed by us. Fixed price contracts, in comparison to cost-plus contracts, typically offer higher profit opportunities because we bear the risk of cost-overruns and receive the benefit of cost savings. For all contract types, there is risk associated with the assumptions we use to formulate our pricing of the proposed work. In addition, when we serve as a subcontractor under our contracts, we are exposed to the risks of delays in payment from the prime contractor for the services we provide. Risks under Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracts, GSA Schedule contracts and GWACs--Many of our U.S. federal government customers spend their procurement budgets through multiple award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracts, GSA Schedule contracts and GWACs under which we are required to compete for post-award orders. Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many U.S. federal government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through multiple award ID/IQ contracts, GSA Schedule contracts and other multiple award and/or GWAC vehicles. These contract vehicles have resulted in increased competition and pricing pressure requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenues under the relevant contract. There can be no assurance that we will continue to increase revenues or otherwise sell successfully under these contract vehicles. Our failure to compete effectively in this procurement environment could harm our operating results. Government Regulations--We may be liable for penalties under various procurement rules and regulations. Changes in government regulations could harm our operating results. Our defense and U.S. federal civil agency businesses must comply with and are affected by various government regulations. Among the most significant regulations are: o the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and agency regulations supplemental to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which comprehensively regulate the formation, administration and performance of government contracts; o the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations; o the Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based government contracts; and o laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data. These regulations affect how our customers and we can do business and, in some instances, impose added costs on our businesses. In addition, we are subject to industrial security regulations of the Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies that are designed to safeguard against unauthorized persons', including foreigners', access to classified information. If we were to come under foreign ownership, control or influence, our U.S. federal government customers could terminate or decide not to renew our contracts, which could impair our ability to obtain new contracts. Any changes in applicable laws and regulations could also harm our operating results. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee reductions or suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. federal government. Risks Relating to Reductions or Changes in Military and Department of Defense-related Intelligence Agency Expenditures--A decline in the U.S. defense budget may adversely affect our operations. Sales under contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense, including sales under subcontracts having the Department of Defense as the ultimate purchaser, represented approximately 88% and 89% of our sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004, respectively. The U.S. defense budget declined from time to time in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, resulting in a slowing of new program starts, program delays and program cancellations. These reductions caused most defense-related government contractors to experience declining revenues, increased pressure on operating margins and, in some cases, net losses. While spending authorizations for defense-related programs by the government have increased in recent years, and in particular after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, these spending levels may not be sustainable, and future levels of expenditures and authorizations for those programs may decrease, remain constant or shift to programs in areas where we currently provide limited or no services. A change in the U.S. Presidential Administration or in the composition of Congress could also materially affect levels of support for military expenditures. A general significant decline in military expenditures could harm our operating results. We are not able to guarantee that contract orders included in our estimated remaining contract value will result in actual revenues in any particular fiscal period or that the actual revenues from such contracts will equal our estimated remaining contract value. There can be no assurance that any contracts included in our estimated remaining contract value presented in this filing will result in actual revenues in any particular period or that the actual revenues from such contracts will equal our estimated remaining contract value. Further, there can be no assurance that any contract included in our estimated remaining contract value that generates revenue will be profitable. Our estimated remaining contract value consists of funded backlog, which is based upon amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment of goods and services, and unfunded contract value, which is based upon management's estimate of the future potential of our existing contracts (including contract options) to generate revenues. These estimates are based on our experience under such contracts and similar contracts, and we believe such estimates to be reasonable. However, there can be no assurances that all of such estimated remaining contract value will be recognized as revenue. In addition, the U.S. federal government's ability to select multiple winners under ID/IQ contracts and GWACs, as well as its right to compete subsequent task orders among such multiple winners, means that there is no assurance that certain of our existing contracts will result in actual orders. Further, the U.S. federal government enjoys broad rights to unilaterally modify or terminate such contracts and task orders, including the right not to exercise options to extend multi-year contracts through the end of their potential terms. Accordingly, most of our existing contracts and task orders are subject to modification and termination at the U.S. federal government's discretion. In addition, funding for orders from the U.S. federal government is subject to approval on an annual basis by Congress pursuant to the appropriations process. Government Intent to Replace Legacy Systems--Our business will be harmed if government agencies are unwilling to replace or supplement expensive legacy systems. Government agencies have spent substantial resources over an extended period of time to develop computer systems and to train their personnel to use them. These agencies may be reluctant to abandon or supplement these legacy systems with Internet and other advanced technology systems because of the cost of developing them or the additional cost of re-training their personnel. Such reluctance would make it more difficult to acquire new contracts, which would harm our business prospects. Reliance on Subcontractors--We regularly employ subcontractors to assist us in satisfying our contractual obligations. If these subcontractors fail to adequately perform their contractual obligations, our prime contract performance and our ability to obtain future business could be materially and adversely impacted. Our performance on government contracts may involve the issuance of subcontracts to other companies upon which we rely to perform all or a portion of the work we are obligated to deliver to our customers. There is a risk that we may have disputes with subcontractors concerning a number of issues including the quality and timeliness of work performed by the subcontractor, customer concerns about the subcontractor, our decision not to extend existing task orders or issue new task orders under a subcontract, or our hiring of former personnel of a subcontractor. A failure by one or more of our subcontractors to satisfactorily deliver on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies and/or perform the agreed-upon services may materially and adversely impact our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor. Further, there is a risk that a subcontractor's technology solution on which certain of our contracts and task orders are dependent could become obsolete or fall out of favor with customers. In extreme cases, such subcontractor performance deficiencies could result in the government terminating our contract for default. A default termination could expose us to liability for excess costs of reprocurement by the government and have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and task orders. Dependence on Key Personnel --If we lose our technical personnel or members of senior management, our business may be adversely affected. Our continued success depends in large part on our ability to recruit and retain the technical personnel necessary to serve our customers effectively. Competition for skilled personnel in the information technology and systems engineering services industry is intense and technology service companies often experience high attrition among their skilled employees. Excessive attrition among our technical personnel could increase our costs of performing our contractual obligations, reduce our ability to efficiently satisfy our customers' needs and constrain our future growth. In addition, we must often comply with provisions in U.S. federal government contracts that require employment of persons with specified levels of education, work experience and security clearances. The loss of any significant number of our existing key technical personnel or the inability to attract and retain key technical employees in the future could have a material adverse effect on our ability to win new business and could harm our operating results. There is also a risk that our efforts to hire personnel of our competitors or subcontractors or other persons could lead to claims being asserted against us that our recruitment efforts violate contractual arrangements or are otherwise wrongful. In addition, we believe that the success of our business strategy and our ability to operate profitably depends on the continued employment of our senior management team, led by Joseph M. Kampf. None of our senior management team has an employment contract with us. If Mr. Kampf or other members of our senior management team become unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected. Security Clearance--If we cannot obtain the necessary security clearances, we may not be able to perform classified work for the government and our revenues may suffer. Certain government contracts require our facilities and some of our employees to maintain security clearances. If we lose or are unable to obtain required security clearances, the customer can terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration. As a result, to the extent we cannot obtain the required security clearances for our employees working on a particular contract, we may not derive the revenue anticipated from the contract, which, if not replaced with revenue from other contracts, could seriously harm our operating results. Security Issues--Security breaches in sensitive government systems could result in the loss of customers and negative publicity. Many of the systems we develop involve managing and protecting information involved in national security and other sensitive government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could cause serious harm to our business, could result in negative publicity and could prevent us from having further access to such critically sensitive systems or other similarly sensitive areas for other governmental customers. Customer Expectations--We could lose revenues and customers and expose our company to liability if we fail to meet customer expectations. We create, implement and maintain technology solutions that are often critical to our customers' operations. If our technology solutions or other applications have significant defects or errors or fail to meet our customers' expectations, we may: o lose future contract opportunities due to receipt of poor past performance evaluations from our customers; o have contracts terminated for default and be liable to our customers for reprocurement costs and other damages; o receive negative publicity, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract or retain customers; and o suffer claims for substantial damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for the failure. While many of our contracts limit our liability for damages that may arise from negligent acts, errors, mistakes or omissions in rendering services to our customers, we cannot be sure that these contractual provisions will protect us from liability for damages if we are sued. Furthermore, our general liability insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may disclaim coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of any large claim against us could seriously harm our business. Even if not successful, such claims could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to management. Acquisition Strategy--We intend to pursue future acquisitions which may adversely affect our business if we cannot effectively integrate these new operations. We have completed and integrated nine strategic acquisitions since 1997. The U.S. federal government information technology solutions and systems engineering services industry remains fragmented, and we believe that acquisition and consolidation opportunities will continue to present themselves periodically. We intend to continue to selectively review acquisition candidates with a focus on companies with complementary skills or market focus. Our continued success may depend upon our ability to integrate any businesses we may acquire in the future. The integration of such businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties, may absorb significant management attention and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of our business. Such difficulties of integration may include the coordination of geographically dispersed organizations, the integration of personnel with disparate business backgrounds and the reconciliation of different corporate cultures. In addition, in certain acquisitions, U.S. federal acquisition regulations may require us to enter into contract novation agreements with the government, a routinely time-consuming process. Government agencies may delay in recognizing us as the successor contractor in these situations, thereby possibly preventing our realization of some of the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions. There can be no assurance that acquired entities will operate profitably, that we will realize anticipated synergies or that these acquisitions will cause our operating performance to improve. Although management regularly engages in discussions with and submits acquisition proposals to acquisition targets, there can be no assurance that suitable acquisition targets will be available in the future on reasonable terms. In addition, to the extent that we complete any additional acquisitions, no assurance can be given that acquisition financing will be available on reasonable terms or at all, that any new businesses will generate revenues or net income comparable to our existing businesses or that such businesses will be integrated successfully or operated profitably. Potential Undisclosed Liabilities Associated with Acquisitions--We may be subject to certain liabilities assumed in connection with our acquisitions that could harm our operating results. We conduct due diligence in connection with each of our acquisitions. In connection with any of our acquisitions, there may be liabilities that we fail to discover or that we inadequately assess in our due diligence efforts. In particular, to the extent that prior owners of any acquired businesses or properties failed to comply with or otherwise violated applicable laws or regulations, or failed to fulfill their contractual obligations to the U.S. federal government or other customers, we, as the successor owner, may be financially responsible for these violations and failures and may suffer reputational harm or otherwise be adversely affected. The discovery of any material liabilities associated with our acquisitions could harm our operating results. Our Employees may Engage in Improper Activities with Adverse Consequences to our Business. As with other government contractors, we are faced with the possibility that our employees may engage in misconduct, fraud or other improper activities that may have adverse consequences to our prospects and results of operations. Misconduct by employees could include failures to comply with U.S. federal government procurement regulations, violation of federal requirements concerning the protection of classified information, improper labor and cost charging to contracts and misappropriation of government or third party property and information. The occurrence of any such employee activities could result in our suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. federal government, as well as the imposition of fines and penalties, which would cause material harm to our business. Risks Associated with International Operations--Our international business exposes us to additional risks including legal regulations and social, political or economic instability that could harm our operating results. In connection with our international operations (including international operations under U.S. government contracts), we are subject to risks associated with operating in and selling to foreign countries, including: o compliance with the laws of the countries in which we operate; o hyperinflation or political instability in foreign countries; o potential personal injury to our personnel who may be exposed to military conflict or other hostile situations in foreign countries; o fluctuation in currency conversion to the U.S. dollar; o imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions or requirements by foreign governments; and o compliance with U.S. arms export control regulations and policies, which govern our ability to supply foreign affiliates and customers. Although our international operations are not currently substantial, to the extent we expand our international operations, these and other risks associated with international operations are likely to increase. Although such risks have not harmed our operating results in the past, no assurance can be given that such risks will not harm our operating results in the future. Risks related to our capital structure Ability to Service Debt--To service our debt, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. You should be aware that our ability to repay or refinance our debt depends on our successful financial and operating performance. We cannot assure you that our business strategy will succeed or that we will achieve our anticipated financial results. Our financial and operational performance depends upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include: o the current economic and competitive conditions in the information technology industry; o budgetary constraints affecting U.S. federal government spending, and changes in fiscal policies or available funding; o U.S. federal government shutdowns and other potential delays in the government appropriations process; o delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices due to problems with, or upgrades to, government information systems, or for other reasons; o any operating difficulties, operating costs or pricing pressures we may experience; o the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that affect us adversely; and o delays in implementing any strategic projects we may have. Additional Borrowings Available--Despite current debt levels, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further increase the risks described above. We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, or "Credit Facility," limit, but do not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. As of December 31, 2005, our Credit Facility would have permitted additional borrowings of up to $488.1 million. If new debt is added by us or our subsidiaries, the related risks that we and they now face could increase. If our financial performance declines and we are unable to pay our debts, we will be required to pursue one or more alternative strategies, such as selling assets, refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness or selling additional equity capital. Also, certain alternative strategies would require the consent of our senior secured lenders before we engage in any such strategy. Restrictive Debt Covenants--The terms of our Credit Facility impose significant restrictions on our ability and that of our subsidiaries to take certain actions which may have an impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our Credit Facility imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and requires us to meet certain financial tests. These restrictions may significantly limit or prohibit us from engaging in certain transactions, including the following: o incurring or guaranteeing additional debt; o paying dividends or other distributions to our stockholders or redeeming, repurchasing or retiring our capital stock or subordinated obligations; o making investments, loans and advances; o making capital expenditures; o creating liens on our assets; o issuing or selling capital stock of our subsidiaries; o transforming or selling assets currently held by us, including sale and lease-back transactions; o modifying certain agreements, including those related to indebtedness; o engaging in transactions with affiliates; and o engaging in mergers, consolidations or acquisitions. The failure to comply with any of these covenants would cause a default under our Credit Facility. A default, if not waived, could result in acceleration of our debt, in which case the debt would become immediately due and payable. If this occurs, we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if new financing is available, it may not be on terms that are acceptable to us. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None Item 2. Properties Our headquarters are located in leased facilities in Fairfax, Virginia. In total, we lease approximately 1.5 million square feet of office, shop and warehouse space in over 100 facilities across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia. We own an office building in North Stonington, Connecticut, which contains 63,578 square feet of office space and is currently on the market for sale. The Company believes its facilities are adequate for its present needs and expects them to remain adequate for the foreseeable future. We also have employees working at customer sites throughout the United States and in other countries. Item 3. Legal Proceedings On November 4, 2005, we received a Customs Export Enforcement Subpoena for documents from the United States Customs Service. The subpoena requested the production of records and information in connection with two of our programs, and a description of our export compliance program. We produced documents responsive to the subpoena in November and December 2005 and the matter is on-going. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, we do not believe that it will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We are involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, but do not believe that they will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise. Part II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters Our common stock has been publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or the "NYSE," since March 11, 2002. The following table sets forth the high and low sale price per share of our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 as reported by the NYSE. 2005 Quarter Ended High Low ----------------- --------------- ---------------- March 31 $ 42.00 $ 33.54 June 30 $ 46.00 $ 35.99 September 30 $ 48.22 $ 41.40 December 31 $ 54.84 $ 40.75 2004 Quarter Ended High Low ------------------ --------------- ---------------- March 31 $ 37.00 $ 27.01 June 30 $ 33.62 $ 28.75 September 30 $ 37.29 $ 28.25 December 31 $ 43.16 $ 35.70 We have not in the past paid, and do not expect for the foreseeable future to pay, dividends on our common stock. Instead, we anticipate that all of our future earnings, if any, will be used in the operation and expansion of our business, for working capital, and other general corporate purposes. Our board will determine whether to pay dividends in the future based on conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, as well as economic and other conditions as the board may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock is restricted by the provisions of Delaware law and covenants in our Credit Facility. The Company has filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC to register 1.2 million shares of the Company's common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP,") which was implemented on April 1, 2004. The Company has suspended the employee stock purchase plan, pending the closing of the Merger with General Dynamics. The table below details the shares purchased by the Company on the open market under the ESPP during certain periods:

Item 6. Selected Financial Data The selected consolidated financial data set forth below have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001. These results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period and are not comparable between prior periods as a result of business acquisitions consummated in 2001, 2003, 2004, and 2005. Results of operations of these acquired businesses are included in our consolidated financial statements for the periods subsequent to the respective dates of acquisition. You should read the selected consolidated financial data presented below in conjunction with Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," Item 1. "Business" and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this filing.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations You should read the following discussion in conjunction with Item 6. "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this filing. Some of the statements in the following discussion are forward-looking statements. See "Forward-Looking Statements." General We are a leading provider of information technology solutions and systems engineering and integration services to government customers as measured by revenue. We design, integrate, maintain and upgrade state-of-the-art information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other high priority government missions. We also provide many of our government customers with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage their mission systems development and operations. We have a broad customer and contract base and a diverse contract mix. We currently serve over 1,000 U.S. federal government customers in more than 50 government agencies, as well as state and foreign governments. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 88% of our revenue was derived from contracts with the DOD and intelligence agencies, and approximately 11% from civilian agencies that includes the Department of Homeland Security of the U.S. federal government. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 86% of our revenue was from contracts where we were the lead, or "prime," contractor. Our diverse contract base has approximately 800 active contracts and more than 4,300 active task orders. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our Stricom task order under the ANSWER contract accounted for approximately 11% of our revenues. No other task order accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. We have a diverse mix of contract types, with approximately 41%, 37%, and 22% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 derived from time and materials, cost-plus and fixed price contracts, respectively. We generally do not pursue fixed price software development contracts that may create financial risk. We have contracts with an estimated remaining contract value of $6.5 billion as of December 31, 2005, of which $910.6 million was funded backlog. Our contracts have a weighted-average term of approximately 7 years, assuming the exercise of all potential contract options. From December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2005, our estimated remaining contract value increased at a 21% compounded annual growth rate, including the effect of acquisitions. Description of Critical Accounting Policies Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates including those related to uncollected accounts receivable, contingent liabilities, revenue recognition, goodwill and other intangible assets. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that our critical accounting policies which require more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are revenue recognition, costs of revenues, goodwill impairment, long-lived assets and identifiable intangible asset impairment and business combinations. Revenue Recognition During the year ended December 31, 2005, we estimate that approximately 98% of our revenues were derived from services and approximately 2% from product sales. Services are performed under contracts that may be categorized into three primary types: time and materials, cost-plus reimbursement and firm fixed price. Revenues for time and materials contracts are recognized as time is spent at hourly rates, which are negotiated with the customer plus the cost of any allowable material costs and out-of-pocket expenses. Time and materials contracts are typically more profitable than cost-plus contracts because of our ability to negotiate rates and manage costs on those contracts. Revenues are recognized under cost-plus contracts on the basis of direct and indirect costs incurred plus a negotiated profit calculated as a percentage of costs, a fixed amount or as a performance-based award fee. Cost-plus type contracts provide relatively less risk than other contract types because we are reimbursed for all direct costs and certain indirect costs, such as overhead and general and administrative expenses, and are paid a fee for work performed. For certain cost-plus type contracts, which are referred to as cost-plus award fee or incentive fee type contracts, we recognize the expected fee to be awarded by the customer at the time such fee can be reasonably estimated, based on factors such as our prior award experience, communications with the customer regarding our performance, including any interim performance evaluations rendered by the customer or our average historical award fee rate on similar type contracts. Under substantially all fixed price contracts, which are predominantly level of effort contracts, revenues are recognized using the cost-to-cost method for all services provided. Fixed price contracts that involve a defined number of hours or a defined category of personnel are referred to as "level of effort" contracts. We believe the cost-to-cost method is the best estimate for determining performance on these contracts. For product-related fixed price contracts, revenues are recognized as units are delivered (the units-of-delivery method). In addition, we evaluate the contracts for multiple deliverables which may require the segmentation of each deliverable into a separate accounting unit for proper revenue recognition as defined by EITF 00-21. The appropriate revenue recognition method based on applicable accounting guidance is then applied for each separate unit. We recognize revenues under our U.S. federal government contracts when a contract is executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable, delivery of the services or products has occurred, the contract is funded and collectibility of the contract price is considered probable. Our contracts with agencies of the U.S. federal government are subject to periodic funding by the respective contracting agency. Funding for a contract may be provided in full at inception of the contract or periodically throughout the term of the contract as the services are provided. From time to time, we may proceed with work on unfunded portions of existing contracts based on customer direction pending finalization and signing of contractual funding documents. We have an internal process for approving any such work. All revenue recognition is deferred during periods in which funding is not received. Costs incurred during such periods are deferred if the receipt of funding is assessed as probable. In evaluating the probability of funding being received, we consider our previous experiences with the customer, communications with the customer regarding funding status, and our knowledge of available funding for the contract or program. If funding is not assessed as probable, costs are expensed as they are incurred. Historically, we have not recorded any significant write-offs because funding was not ultimately received. For cost based contracts, we recognize revenues under our U.S. federal government contracts based on allowable contract costs, as mandated by the U.S. federal government's cost accounting standards. The costs we incur under U.S. federal government contracts are subject to regulation and audit by certain agencies of the federal government. Historically, contract cost disallowances resulting from government audits have not been significant. We may be exposed to variations in profitability, including potential losses, if we encounter variances from estimated fees earned under award fee contracts and estimated costs under fixed price contracts. Our incurred costs have been audited through 2003. Contract revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. Examples of such estimates include the level of effort needed to accomplish the tasks under the contract, the cost of those efforts, and a continual assessment of our progress toward the completion of the contract. From time to time, circumstances may arise which require us to revise our estimated total revenue or costs. Typically, these revisions relate to contractual changes. To the extent that a revised estimate affects contract revenue or profit previously recognized, we record the cumulative effect of the revision in the period in which it becomes known. In addition, the full amount of an anticipated loss on any type of contract is recognized in the period in which it becomes known. We generally do not pursue fixed price software development work that may create material financial risk. We do, however, provide services under fixed price labor hour and fixed price level of effort contracts, which represent similar levels of risk as time and materials contracts. Our contract mix was approximately 41% time and materials, 37% cost-plus and 22% fixed price (a substantial majority of which are firm fixed price level of effort) during the year ended December 31, 2005. The contract mix can change over time depending on contract awards and acquisitions. Under cost-plus contracts with the U.S. federal government, operating profits typically range from 5% to 7% but are statutorily limited to 10% on cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts. Under fixed price and time and materials contracts, margins are not subject to statutory limits. However, the U.S. federal government's objective in negotiating such contracts is to seldom allow for operating profits in excess of 15% and our overall operating profits on such contracts is less than 15%. We maintain reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable which may arise in the normal course of business. Historically, we have not had significant write-offs of uncollectible accounts receivable. However, we do perform work on many contracts and task orders, where on occasion issues may arise, which would lead to accounts receivable not being fully collected. Costs of Revenues Our costs are categorized as either direct or indirect costs. Direct costs are those that can be identified with and assigned to specific contracts and tasks. They include labor, fringe (vacation time, medical/dental, 401K plan matching contribution, tuition assistance, employee welfare, worker's compensation and other benefits), subcontractor costs, consultant fees, travel expenses and materials. Indirect costs are either overhead, material handling or general and administrative expenses. Indirect costs cannot be identified with specific contracts or tasks, and to the extent that they are allowable, they are allocated to contracts and tasks using appropriate government-approved methodologies. Costs determined to be unallowable under the Federal Acquisition Regulation, or "FAR," cannot be assigned or allocated to projects. Our principal unallowable costs are interest expense, amortization expense for separately identified intangibles from acquisitions, bad debt expense and certain general and administrative expenses. The Company plans to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards or "SFAS," No. 123R in the first quarter of 2006. Under FAR, compensation expense as related to stock options is considered unallowable cost and not recoverable though our contracts. However, compensation expense as related to restricted shares is allowable and can be allocated to the contracts and tasks. A key element to our success has been our ability to control indirect and unallowable costs, enabling us to profitably execute our existing contracts and successfully bid for new contracts. In addition, with the acquisition of new companies, we have been able to control our indirect costs and improve operating margins by integrating the indirect cost structures and realizing opportunities for cost synergies. Costs of revenues are considered to be a critical accounting policy because of the direct relationship to revenue recognized. Goodwill Impairment Goodwill relating to our acquisitions represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired, and has a carrying amount of approximately $260.8 million and $242.1 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in goodwill in 2005 was primarily related to the acquisition of Milestone in October 2005. We completed our annual impairment analyses as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, noting no indications of impairment for any of our reporting units. As of December 31, 2005, there have been no events or circumstances that would indicate an impairment test should be performed sooner than our planned annual test as of September 30, 2006. Long-Lived Assets and Identifiable Intangible Asset Impairment The net carrying amount of long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets was approximately $33.9 million and $24.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Of the $33.9 million at December 31, 2005, approximately $10.4 million of the intangible assets, net of amortization, are related to our recent acquisition of Milestone. Long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets, excluding goodwill, are evaluated for impairment when events occur that suggest that such assets may be impaired. Such events could include, but are not limited to, the loss of a significant customer or contract, decreases in U.S. federal government appropriations or funding of certain programs, or other similar events. None of these events occurred for the year ended December 31, 2005. We determine if an impairment has occurred based on a comparison of the carrying amount of such assets to the future undiscounted net cash flows, excluding charges for interest. If considered impaired, the impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their estimated fair value, as determined by an analysis of discounted cash flows using a discounted interest rate based on our cost of capital and the related risks of recoverability. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recognized an impairment charge of approximately $135,000, included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, to write-down the carrying value of a building that is currently on the market for sale to its estimated fair market value. In evaluating impairment, we consider, among other things, our ability to sustain our current financial performance on contracts and tasks, our access to and penetration of new markets and customers and the duration of, and estimated amounts from, our contracts. Any uncertainty of future financial performance is dependent on our ability to maintain our customers and the continued funding of our contracts and tasks by the government. Over the past four years, we have been able to win the majority of our contracts that have been recompeted. In addition, we have been able to sustain financial performance through indirect cost savings from our acquisitions, which have generally resulted in either maintaining or improving margins on our contracts and tasks. If we are required to record an impairment charge in the future, it would have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Business Combinations We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized at their estimated fair market values at the acquisition date. The purchase price in excess of the estimated fair market value of the net tangible and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired represents goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price related to our business combinations involves significant estimates and management judgment that may be adjusted during the allocation period, but in no case beyond one year from the acquisition date. Costs incurred related to successful business combinations are capitalized as costs of business combinations, while costs incurred by us for unsuccessful or terminated acquisition opportunities are expensed when we determine that such opportunities will no longer be pursued. Costs incurred related to probable business combinations are deferred. Statements of Operations The following is a description of certain line items from our audited consolidated statements of operations, which include the acquisition of Milestone since the date of the acquisition. Costs of revenues include direct labor and fringe costs for program personnel and direct expenses incurred to complete contracts and task orders. Costs of revenues also include depreciation, overhead, and other direct contract costs, which include subcontract work, consultant fees, and materials. Overhead consists of indirect costs relating to operational managers, rent/facilities, administration, travel and other expenses. General and administrative expenses are primarily for corporate functions such as management, legal, finance and accounting, contracts and administration, human resources, company management information systems and depreciation, and also include other unallowable costs such as marketing, certain legal fees and reserves. Amortization expenses relate to the costs associated with intangible assets from our acquisitions. These intangible assets represent the fair value assigned to contract backlog and customer relationships as part of our acquisitions. Amortization expenses also include costs associated with certain non-compete agreements related to the ISI acquisition. Other income is from non-core business items such as a gain on the reversal of a reserve created from a prior acquisition, a settlement agreement in 2004 with the former shareholders of Sherikon, Inc., a write-off of deferred shelf registration costs and the fair market value adjustments related to marketable equity securities that are classified as trading securities. Merger related expenses relate to legal and financial advisory costs associated with the planned merger with General Dynamics and a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics. Secondary offering expenses relate to costs associated with the selling of our common stock in underwritten offerings during the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company sold no shares and received no proceeds in these offerings. Therefore, we were required to classify the related costs as expenses. Interest expense is primarily related to our Term Loan B and revolving facility, our Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009, or the "12% Notes" and amortization of deferred financing costs. None of our 12% Notes remained outstanding after June 2004. Interest expense is reported net of interest income. Interest income primarily relates to the interest earned on short term investments and cash-on-hand. Funded Backlog and Estimated Remaining Contract Value Each year a significant portion of our revenue is derived from existing contracts with our government customers, and a portion of the revenue represents work related to maintenance, upgrade or replacement of systems under contracts or projects for which we are the incumbent provider. Proper management of contracts is critical to our overall financial success and we believe that effective management of costs makes us competitive on price. Historically, we believe that our demonstrated performance record and service excellence have enabled us to maintain our position as an incumbent service provider on more than 87% of our contracts that have been recompeted. We have increased our estimated remaining contract value by approximately $236.1 million, from $6.3 billion as of December 31, 2004, to $6.5 billion at December 31, 2005, of which approximately $910.6 million was funded backlog as of December 31, 2005. Funded backlog increased approximately $79.7 million to $910.6 million at December 31, 2005, from $830.9 million as of December 31, 2004. Our estimated remaining contract value represents the aggregate contract revenue we estimate will be earned over the remaining life of our contracts. When more than one company is awarded a contract for a given work requirement, we include in estimated remaining contract value only our estimate of the contract revenue we expect to earn over the remaining term of the contract. Funded backlog is based upon amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment for goods and services. Because the U.S. federal government operates under annual appropriations, agencies of the U.S. federal government typically fund contracts on an incremental basis. Accordingly, the majority of the estimated remaining contract value is not funded backlog. Our estimated remaining contract value is based on our experience under contracts and we believe our estimates are reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that our existing contracts will result in actual revenues in any particular period or at all. These amounts could vary depending upon government budgets and appropriations. Acquisitions The following table summarizes our acquisitions since January 2004. Revenues for the most recently completed twelve month period ended prior Name Acquisition Date to acquisition ------------------- ------------------ ------------------------ (in thousands) STI.......................... July 2004 $ 20,686 IMSI......................... August 2004 $ 31,715 MILESTONE.................... October 2005 $ 18,689 Acquisitions We have completed and integrated nine strategic acquisitions since 1997. Since January 2004, we have acquired three businesses: Simulation Technologies Inc., Integrated Management Services, Inc., and Milestone Group, LLC. Simulation Technologies, Inc. - On July 27, 2004, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of Simulation Technologies Inc., or "STI," a provider of modeling and simulation software solutions and services, based in San Antonio, Texas, for a total purchase price of $15.1 million (net of cash acquired), including transaction costs. We financed the acquisition through borrowings under our existing Credit Facility. The transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $2.6 million of contracts and related customer relationships with an expected weighted average useful life of 5 years. The value of the contracts and customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by us. Goodwill recognized from this acquisition was approximately $9.5 million and is not deductible for tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill arising from the transaction is not being amortized. Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 141, the effect of the acquisition did not meet the criteria of a significant acquisition, and therefore, pro forma disclosures are not presented in the audited consolidated financial statements. Integrated Management Services, Inc. - On August 11, 2004, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of Integrated Management Services, Inc., or "IMSI," a provider of high end, mission critical information and securities solutions, based in Arlington, Virginia, for a total purchase price of $29.0, million including transaction costs. We financed the acquisition through borrowings under our existing Credit Facility. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, we may be obligated to pay up to $2.0 million of additional consideration if follow on work related to a certain government contract was awarded in the time frame set forth under the stock purchase agreement. We have communicated to the seller of IMSI our determination of the additional consideration we believe is due, have received the seller's response and intend to further discuss the matter with the seller. The transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $5.9 million of contracts and related customer relationships with an expected weighted average useful life of 5 years. The value of the contracts and customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by us. Goodwill recognized from this acquisition was approximately $20.6 million and is deductible for tax purposes due to a tax code election made at the time of the acquisition. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill arising from the transaction is not being amortized. Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 141, the effect of the acquisition did not meet the criteria of a significant acquisition, and therefore, pro forma disclosures are not presented in the audited consolidated financial statements. Milestone Group, LLC. - On October 14, 2005, we purchased all of the outstanding limited liability membership interests of Milestone Group, LLC, or "Milestone," a provider of IT professional services, based in Arlington, Virginia, for a total purchase price of $30.9 million, including transaction costs. We financed the acquisition through cash-on-hand and proceeds from the sales of short term investments. The transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $10.5 million of contracts and related customer relationships with an expected weighted average useful life of 8 years. The value of the contracts and customer relationships is based on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by us. Goodwill recognized from this acquisition was approximately $18.9 million and is deductible for tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill arising from the transaction is not being amortized. Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 141, the effect of the acquisition did not meet the criteria of a significant acquisition, and therefore, pro forma disclosures are not presented in the audited consolidated financial statements. Results of Operations Our historical consolidated financial statements do not reflect the full-year impact of the operating results of a number of our acquisitions, since their operating results are only included or excluded from our results from the date of acquisition, as applicable. The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations based on the amounts and percentage relationship of the items listed to revenues during the period shown:

2005 compared with 2004 Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2005, revenues increased by $225.1 million, or 17.7%, to $1.493 billion from $1.268 billion for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in revenues was attributable primarily to organic growth. We define organic growth as the increase in revenues excluding the revenues associated with acquisitions, divestitures and closures of businesses in comparable periods. We believe organic growth is a useful supplemental measure to revenues. Management uses organic growth as part of its evaluation of core operating results and underlying trends. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our organic growth was 14.9%, or $188.4 million. The increase in revenues attributable to organic growth was primarily driven by growth in the following business areas: task orders in support of a wide range of federal government agencies under our GSA ANSWER, Millenia Lite - Area 3, and Logistic Worldwide contracts; Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program; Stricom Omnibus Contract (STOC) including Military Operations on Urban Terrain (MOUT); and task orders under our Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Multiple Award Contract. Costs of Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2005, costs of revenues increased by $183.2 million, or 16.8%, to $1.277 billion from $1.093 billion for year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in costs of revenues was due in part to the corresponding growth in revenues resulting from organic growth and the increase in employee headcount. The majority of the increase in costs of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 was due to increases of $68.4 million and $82.9 million in direct labor and other direct contract costs, respectively. Gross Profit For the year ended December 31, 2005, gross profit increased by $41.9 million, or 24.0%, to $216.6 million from $174.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased to 14.5% from 13.8% as a result of improvements to profit rates on certain contracts. General and Administrative Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2005, general and administrative expenses increased $10.7 million, or 16.3%, to $76.7million from $66.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004, as a percentage of revenues decreased to 5.1% from 5.2%. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to the corresponding growth in revenues and additions to the allowance for uncollectible receivables. The decrease in general and administrative as a percentage of revenues was primarily related to controlling our indirect costs. Amortization For the year ended December 31, 2005, amortization expenses increased $339,000, or 12.7%, to $3.0 million from $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in amortization expense was a result of additional amortization related to intangible assets acquired in connection with the purchase of Milestone. Amortization as a percentage of revenues remained constant at 0.2%. Operating Income For the year ended December 31, 2005, operating income increased $30.9 million, or 29.1%, to $136.9 million from $106.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in operating income was primarily a result of the corresponding increase in revenues. Operating income as a percentage of revenues increased to 9.2% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 8.4% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in operating income as a percentage of revenues was primarily a result of controlling our indirect costs and an improvement to profit rates on certain contracts Other Income For the year ended December 31, 2005, other income was $1.0 million as compared to $973,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. The 2005 other income was primarily related to a $900,000 gain on a reversal of an acquisition reserve. The 2004 other income was primarily related to a $899,000 gain on a settlement agreement with the former shareholders of Sherikon. Merger Related Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2005, merger related expenses were $2.4 million compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in merger related expenses was a result of legal and financial advisory costs incurred with the planned merger with General Dynamics and a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics Interest Expense, Net For the year ended December 31, 2005, interest expense, net of interest income, increased $1.1 million, or 14.3%, to $8.9 million from $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The net increase in interest expense was primarily due to the higher interest rates on the Term Loan B during the year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the interest rate on the Term Loan B borrowings ranged from 4.31% to 6.14% compared to a range of 3.11% to 4.31% on the term loan outstanding for the same period in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, interest income earned on short term investments and cash-on-hand was $1.0 million and $31,000, respectively. Provision For Income Taxes Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 37.8%, compared with 37.5% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The 2005 effective tax rate reflects a benefit for tax exempt interest, a benefit for current and prior year state and local tax credits, and an expense for nondeductible transaction costs. The 2004 effective tax rate reflects a benefit for federal research and experimentation credits from amending prior years tax returns, state legislative changes and a non-recurring benefit from nontaxable other income resulting from the settlement with the former owners of Sherikon. 2004 compared with 2003 Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2004, revenues increased by $225.7 million, or 21.6%, to $1.268 billion from $1.042 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in revenues was attributable to organic growth and the acquisitions of STI and IMSI. We define organic growth as the increase in revenues excluding the revenues associated with acquisitions, divestitures and closures of businesses in comparable periods. We believe organic growth is a useful supplemental measure to revenue. Management uses organic growth as part of its evaluation of core operating results and underlying trends. For the year ended December 31, 2004, our organic growth was 14.2%, or $146.3 million. The acquisitions of STI and IMSI accounted for approximately $20.8 million of the revenue growth for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in revenues attributable to organic growth was primarily driven by growth in the following business areas: task orders in support of a wide range of federal government agencies under our GSA ANSWER and Management and Business Services (MOBIS) contracts; Engineering and Technical Services for Deploying Enabling Technologies with the U.S. Navy; engineering and technical support to the U.S. Army's "Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation"; Foreign Military Sales Logistics support; and task orders under our NAVSEA Multiple Award Contract. Costs of Revenues For the year ended December 31, 2004, costs of revenues increased by $196.2 million, or 21.9%, to $1.093 billion from $897.3 million for year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in costs of revenues was due in part to the corresponding growth in revenues resulting from organic growth and the acquisition of STI and IMSI and the increase in employee headcount. The majority of the increase in costs of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 was due to increases of $78.1 million and $76.5 million in direct labor and other direct contract costs, respectively. Gross Profit For the year ended December 31, 2004, gross profit increased by $29.5 million, or 20.3%, to $174.7 million from $145.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2004, as a percentage of revenues remained relatively consistent. General and Administrative Expenses For the year ended December 31, 2004, general and administrative expenses increased $7.3 million, or 12.5%, to $66.0 million from $58.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004, as a percentage of revenues, decreased to 5.2% from 5.6%. This decline in the percentage of revenues was driven primarily by operational cost efficiencies achieved in connection with acquisitions and their successful integration. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to the corresponding growth in revenues and additional expenses related to compliance with provisions of, and rules promulgated in connection with, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Amortization For the year ended December 31, 2004, amortization expenses increased $226,000, or 9.2%, to $2.7 million from $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in amortization expense was a result of additional amortization related to intangible assets acquired in connection with the purchase of STI and IMSI. Operating Income For the year ended December 31, 2004, operating income increased $21.9 million, or 26.1%, to $106.0 million from $84.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in operating income was primarily a result of the corresponding increase in revenues. Operating income as a percentage of revenues increased to 8.4% for the year ended December 31, 2004 from 8.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in the percentage of revenues was driven by the decline in the general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues. Other Income For the year ended December 31, 2004, other income was $973,000 as compared to zero for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in other income was primarily related to a settlement agreement we entered into in July 2004 with the former owners of Sherikon, a company we acquired in October 2000. Under the provisions of the settlement agreement, the principal amount of the subordinated note payable was reduced from $2.5 million to $1.35 million, and we paid the reduced note amount, without interest. This resulted in other income of approximately $899,000, net of legal expenses. Interest Expense, Net For the year ended December 31, 2004, interest expense, net of interest income, decreased $16.5 million, or 68.0%, to $7.7 million from $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the repurchase of our 12% Notes and the refinancing of our Credit Facility. In December 2003, we reduced the balance on our 12% Notes to approximately $1.9 million from $75.0 million by utilizing the proceeds from the $150.0 million in Term Loan B borrowings made under the Credit Facility. In June 2004, we repurchased the remaining $1.9 million principal amount outstanding of our 12% Notes. In conjunction with the repurchase in 2004, we paid a tender premium of $113,000 which was included in interest for 2004. In 2003, we incurred a $7.2 million bond premium and consent payment, $300,000 of fees and wrote off $2.6 million of deferred financing fees to interest expense. Secondary Offering Expenses On October 29, 2004, affiliates of and companies managed by Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc., including Azimuth Technologies, L.P., Azimuth Tech II LLC and Frederick J. Iseman, which we refer to collectively as the "Caxton-Iseman Stockholders," sold 3,600,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten offering pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC (Commission File No. 333-111249). Neither we nor any of our executive officers participated in the sale of shares in this offering. In connection with this offering, we incurred $240,000 of expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004, for which we were not reimbursed in accordance with the terms of our registration rights agreement with certain of our stockholders, as amended. On September 22, 2003, certain of our stockholders, including Caxton-Iseman stockholders, sold 6,600,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC (Commission File Nos. 333-108147 and 333-108858). In the fourth quarter of 2003, the underwriters of this offering partially exercised their over-allotment option with respect to additional shares held by the selling stockholders. As a result, on October 16, 2003, certain of the selling stockholders sold an additional 297,229 shares of our common stock in a second closing pursuant to the same underwritten offering. In connection with this offering, we incurred approximately $852,000 of expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003, which amounts were reimbursed by certain of the selling stockholders and recorded by us as an expense and a contribution to additional paid-in capital. Provision For Income Taxes Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2004 was 37.5%, compared with 38.6% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The 2004 effective tax rate reflects a benefit for federal research and experimentation credits from amending prior years tax returns, state legislative changes and a non-recurring benefit from nontaxable other income resulting from the settlement with the former owners of Sherikon, which resulted in a stock basis difference, for which a deferred tax liability was not required to be recorded. Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 We generated $90.0 million in cash from operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. By comparison, we generated $18.2 million in cash from operations for the year ended December 31, 2004. Accounts receivable Days Sales Outstanding, or "DSO," decreased to 76 days for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 82 days for the year ended December 31, 2004. The 6 day decrease in DSO is largely attributable to our improved billing and collection process. Contract receivables increased $14.5 million to $331.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to $317.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2005 represented 47.5% of total assets at that date. As a result of our acquisition of Milestone, accounts receivable increased by approximately $4.2 million. The remaining increase was attributable to the overall growth of our business. For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash used in investing activities was $74.7 million, which was attributable to our acquisition of Milestone and the purchases of short term investments. Net cash used by financing activities was $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Cash used by financing activities was primarily related to the $19.8 million paydown of the revolver balance under our existing Credit Facility, offset in part by $11.3 million in cash received from financing activities from the issuance of common stock during 2005. On September 30, 2004, we entered into a second amendment to our Credit Facility. This amendment provided an additional $16.1 million of borrowing by increasing our Term Loan B to $165.0 million, and lowered the interest rates on Term Loan B borrowings by 0.25%. The additional $16.1 million in borrowings did not reduce the $200.0 million in potential additional borrowings described below. As of December 31, 2005, total debt outstanding was $162.9 million, consisting of $162.9 million of Term Loan B, and zero outstanding under the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility. The total funds available to us under the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility as of December 31, 2005 were $194.8 million. Under certain conditions related to excess annual cash flow, as defined in our Credit Facility, and the receipt of proceeds from certain asset sales and debt or equity issuances, we are required to prepay, in amounts specified in our Credit Facility, borrowings under the Term Loan B. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we did not have to prepay amounts specified in our Credit Facility as related to annual excess cash flow. Prior to September 30, 2004, our Credit Facility provided, among other things, a Term Loan B in the amount of $150.0 million with a maturity date of December 31, 2010, and the extension of the maturity date of the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility to December 31, 2008. In addition, the Credit Facility permitted us to raise up to $200.0 million of additional debt in the form of additional term loans, subordinated debt or revolving loans with certain restrictions on the amount of revolving loans. All borrowings under our Credit Facility are subject to financial covenants customary for such financings, including, but not limited to: maximum ratio of net debt to EBITDA and maximum ratio of senior debt to EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we complied with all of the financial covenants. Additionally, as a result of changes made in the second amendment and restatement, revolving loans are now based upon an asset test or maximum ratio of net eligible accounts receivable to revolving loans. Historically, our primary liquidity requirements have been for debt service under our Credit Facility and 12% Notes and for acquisitions and working capital requirements. We have funded these requirements primarily through internally generated operating cash flow and funds borrowed under our existing Credit Facility. Our principal working capital need is for funding accounts receivable, which has increased with the growth of our business. For the year ended December 31, 2005, working capital increased by $48.6 million to $217.8 million from $169.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in working capital was primarily the result of growth of our business that generated cash that was held on hand and in short term investments. Our principal sources of cash to fund our working capital needs are cash generated from operations and borrowings under our Credit Facility. In addition, we are scheduled to pay quarterly installments of $412,500 under the Term Loan B until the Credit Facility matures on December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2005, we did not have any capital commitments greater than $1.0 million. We have relatively low capital investment requirements. Capital expenditures were $6.4 million and $4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily for leasehold improvements and office equipment. Our business acquisition expenditures relating to Milestone were $30.9 million in 2005. The acquisition was financed through cash-on-hand and proceeds from the sales of short term investments. In the past, we have engaged in acquisition activity, and we intend to do so in the future. Historically, we have financed our acquisitions through a combination of bank debt, subordinated debt, subordinated public and private debt and equity investments. We expect to be able to finance any future acquisitions either with cash provided from operations, borrowings under our Credit Facility, bank loans, equity offerings, or some combination of the foregoing. We intend to, and expect over the next twelve months to be able to, fund our operating cash, capital expenditure and debt service requirements through cash flow from operations and borrowings under our Credit Facility. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt obligations will depend on our future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside our control. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligation We use off-balance sheet financing, primarily to finance the lease of operating facilities and certain capital items. Operating leases are used primarily to finance computers, servers, phone systems, and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings. As of December 31, 2005, we financed equipment with an original cost of approximately $19.4 million through operating leases. Had we not used operating leases, we would have used our existing Credit Facility to purchase these assets. In addition, our offices, warehouse and shop facilities are obtained through operating leases. Other than the operating leases described above, we do not have any other off-balance sheet financing. The following table provides information (in thousands) as of December 31, 2005 regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations.

Inflation We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business in 2005, 2004, or 2003 as our contract billing rates typically have taken inflation into account. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes" and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in an accounting principle and changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting a change in an accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires the retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of the direct effect of a voluntary change in an accounting principle unless it is impracticable. APB No. 20 required that most voluntary changes in an accounting principle be recognized by including the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle in net income for the first quarter of the year for which the change occurred. FASB stated that SFAS No. 154 improves financial reporting because its requirements enhance the consistency of financial information between periods. Unless early adoption is elected, SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements, including those that are in a transition phase as of the effective date of this statement. The Company believes the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets. This statement amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 29 to improve financial reporting by eliminating certain narrow differences between the FASB's and the International Accounting Standards Board's (IASB) existing accounting standards for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets. The provisions of this statement shall be prospectively applied and are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company believes the adoption of this statement will have no impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share Based Payment. (SFAS No. 123R), which amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123R requires all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments at fair value, and will be effective for public companies with fiscal years beginning after July 1, 2005. This new standard may be adopted in one of three ways: a) the modified prospective transition method, b) the modified retrospective transition method - the beginning of the annual period of adoption or c) the modified retrospective transition method by restating all periods presented. The Company intends to adopt SFAS No. 123R using the modified retrospective transition method in the first quarter of 2006. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk We have interest rate exposure relating to certain of our long-term obligations. The interest rates on both the Term Loan B and the revolving loan portion of our Credit Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We manage these fluctuations by reducing the amount of outstanding debt through cash flow by focusing on billing and collecting our accounts receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the last of our interest rate swap agreements, with a notional value of $10.0 million, matured. We are not currently contemplating any future interest rate swap agreements. However, as market conditions change, we will reevaluate our position. A 1% change in interest rates on variable rate debt would have resulted in our interest expense fluctuating by $1.7 million and $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Our consolidated financial statements are provided in Part IV, Item 15 of this filing. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure We had no disagreements with our independent registered public accounting firm on accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure during the two years prior to the date of our most recent consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2005. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange. Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO Framework"). Management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, Milestone's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $3.9 million and total revenues of $4.6 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. Based on our assessment under the COSO Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005. It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions. Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, issued an attestation report on our management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which appears below. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Anteon International Corporation: We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting that Anteon International Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)". The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company acquired Milestone Group, LLC. ("Milestone") in October 2005, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, Milestone's internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $3.9 million and total revenues of $4.6 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Milestone. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 16, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. KPMG LLP McLean, Virginia March 16, 2006 PART III MANAGEMENT Item 9B. Other Information None Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A. Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A.

EXHIBIT INDEX 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 7, 1999, by and among Anteon Corporation, Buffalo Acquisition Corporation and Analysis & Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit Z to Analysis & Technologies, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 1999). 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger between Anteon International Corporation, a Virginia corporation, and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement, filed on February 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 13, 2005, by and among Anteon International Corporation, Avenger Acquisition Corporation and General Dynamics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2005 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Anteon International Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 3.2 Certificate of Designations of Series A Preferred Stock of Anteon International Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 3.3 Amended and Restated By-laws of Anteon International Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 4.1 Indenture, dated as of May 11, 1999, by and among Anteon Corporation, Vector Data Systems, Inc., Techmatics, Inc. and IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 9, 1999 (Commission File No. 333-84835)). 4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, effective as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Analysis & Technology, Inc., Interactive Media Corp. and IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, effective as of October 14, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Anteon-CITI LLC and IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.4 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 20, 2000, among Anteon Corporation, Sherikon, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.5 Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2001, among Anteon International Corporation (formerly Anteon Corporation), Anteon Corporation (formerly Techmatics, Inc.) and The Bank of New York, as successor trustee of IBJ Whitehall Bank & Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000). 4.6 Fifth Supplemental Indenture between the Registrant and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 4.7 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2002, among Anteon International Corporation (formerly Azimuth Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, Anteon International Corporation (formerly Anteon Corporation), a Virginia corporation, and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2002). 4.8 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 23, 2003, among Anteon International Corporation (formerly Azimuth Technologies, Inc.) and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed on March 8, 2004). 4.9 Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 5, 2003, among Anteon International Corporation, Anteon Corporation, Information Spectrum, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed on March 8, 2004). 4.10 Registration Rights Agreement dated March 11, 2002, among the Registrant, Azimuth Technologies, L.P., Azimuth Tech. II LLC, Frederick J. Iseman, Joseph M. Kampf and the other parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on February 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 4.11 Amendment No. 1, dated as of September 3, 2003, to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 11, 2002, among the Registrant, Azimuth Technologies, L.P., Azimuth Tech. II LLC, Frederick J. Iseman, Joseph M. Kampf and the other parties named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Anteon International Corporation's Form S-3 Registration Statement filed on December 17, 2003 (Commission File No. 333-111249)). 4.12 Rights Agreement, dated March 15, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 5, 2002). 10.1 Second Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2003 among Anteon International Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2004). 10.11Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2002, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon International Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston, Mellon Bank, N.A., Duetsche Bank AG and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 filed on March 11, 2003). 10.12Amendment Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2003 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2002, among Anteon International Corporation, Anteon Corporation, Credit Suisse First Boston and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Anteon International Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 filed on March 8, 2004). 10.15Security Agreement, dated as of June 23, 1999, among Anteon Corporation, Analysis & Technology, Inc., Interactive Media Corp., Techmatics, Inc., Vector Data Systems, Inc. and Mellon Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Anteon International Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 9, 1999 (Commission File No. 333-84835)). 10.16Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 14, 2002). 10.17Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Anteon International Corporation's Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed on February 19, 2002 (Commission File No. 333-75884)). 10.22Form of Amended and Restated Executive Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2006). 10.24Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement dated as of December 31, 2005 by and between Anteon International Corporation and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Anteon International Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2005). 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP. 31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). F-1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Anteon International Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Anteon International Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in Schedule II is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic consolidated financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 16, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP McLean, Virginia March 16, 2006

ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a Delaware Corporation) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2005 and 2004 (1) Organization and Business Anteon International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("Anteon" or the "Company") (formerly Azimuth Technologies, Inc.), was incorporated on March 15, 1996 for the purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding stock of Ogden Professional Services Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ogden Technology Services Corporation and an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Ogden Corporation (collectively "Ogden"). Upon completion of the acquisition effective April 22, 1996, Ogden Professional Services Corporation was renamed Anteon Corporation, a Virginia corporation, and later renamed Anteon International Corporation, a Virginia corporation. The Company provides professional information technology solutions and systems engineering and integration services primarily to government customers. The Company designs, integrates, maintains and upgrades information systems for national defense, intelligence, emergency response and other government missions. The Company also provides many of its government customers with the systems analysis, integration and program management skills necessary to manage their mission systems development and operations. The Company is subject to all of the risks associated with conducting business with the U.S. federal government, including the risk of contract termination for the convenience of the government. In addition, government funding continues to be dependent on congressional approval of program level funding and on contracting agency approval for the Company's work. The extent to which the Company's existing contracts will be funded in the future cannot be determined. On December 13, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger with General Dynamics Corporation, or "General Dynamics," and a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics, pursuant to which General Dynamics agreed to acquire Anteon for approximately $2.2 billion, which includes the assumption of approximately $116 million in net debt. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger agreement, General Dynamics will acquire all of the Company's outstanding common stock in a cash merger at a price of $55.50 per share and the Company's net debt. Upon completion of the Merger, Anteon will become a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics. On March 3, 2006, the Company held a special meeting of stockholders at which the stockholders adopted the Merger agreement and approved the Merger. Completion of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act"). Other than approval pursuant to the HSR Act, no other material federal or state regulatory approvals are required to be obtained by us, General Dynamics or its wholly owned subsidiary in connection with the Merger. The Company anticipates that the transaction will close no later than the end of the second quarter of 2006. The merger agreement may be terminated prior to the effective time, under certain circumstances discussed in the merger agreement. (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (a) Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its directly and indirectly, majority-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. (b) Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments that have original maturities of three months or less. (c) Short Term Investments The Company accounts for investments in debt and marketable equity securities depending upon the purpose of the investment. As of December 31, 2005, the Company held $37.5 million of investments in state and municipal variable rate deposit notes with maturities greater than 10 years. The Company carries the investments as current assets on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company does not intend to hold these investments for a period greater than 12 months and may liquidate these investments to fund working capital requirements or potential acquisitions. With variable rate notes, the Company does not record unrealized gains or losses on the investments as the fair value and the cost basis will always be the same. Interest income on the investments is recognized when earned (d) Property and Equipment Property and equipment is stated at cost, or fair value at the date of acquisition if acquired through a purchase business combination. Property and equipment under capital leases are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation and amortization is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

(e) Deferred Financing Costs Costs associated with obtaining the Company's financing arrangements are deferred and amortized over the term of the financing arrangements using a method that approximates the effective interest method, and are included in intangible and other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. (f) Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. During 2003, the Company recognized an impairment charge of approximately $135,000 included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations, to write down the carrying value of a building, that is currently on the market for sale, to its fair market value. (g) Goodwill The Company uses the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized and reported separately from goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment. In connection with the Company's goodwill impairment evaluation, the Company identifies its reporting units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to these reporting units. The Company determines the estimated fair value of each reporting unit and compares it to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. As a result of this comparison, no indication that the reporting units' fair values were less than their carrying values was noted. In the future, to the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit, an indication would exist that a reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired, and the Company would be required to perform the second step of the impairment test. In the second step, the Company must compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or "SFAS," No. 141. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, using the methodology described above and did not identify any indication of goodwill impairment for any reporting unit for either period. The Company will perform the annual impairment test as of September 30 each year unless circumstances or events indicate that an impairment test should be performed sooner. No such events were noted subsequent to the annual impairment tests in either year. (h) Other Intangible Assets The Company amortizes the allocated cost of noncompete agreements entered into in connection with business combinations on a straight-line basis over the terms of the agreements Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized only if such assets arise from a contractual or other legal right and are separable, that is, capable of being sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination that do not meet this criteria are considered a component of goodwill. As of December 31, 2005, the Company has approximately $18.8 million of intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, related to contracts and related customer relationships, which are being amortized straight-line over periods of up to 8 years Amortization expense on the other intangible assets was approximately $3.0 million, $2.7 million and $2.5 million for the ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company expects to record annual amortization expense over the next five years as follows (in thousands): Year Ending December 31, 2006 $ 3,955 2007 3,887 2008 3,634 2009 2,390 2010 1,310 Thereafter 3,664 ------------ Total $ 18,840 ============ (i) Revenue Recognition For each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, in excess of 98% of the Company's revenues were derived from services performed under contracts with the U.S. federal government that may be categorized into three primary types: time and materials, cost-plus reimbursement and firm fixed price. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 41% of the Company's contracts were time and material, 37% cost-plus and 22% fixed price (a substantial majority of which are fixed price level of effort contracts). Revenues for time and materials contracts are recognized as time is spent at hourly rates, which are negotiated with the customer plus the cost of any allowable material costs and out-of-pocket expenses. Time and materials contracts are typically more profitable than cost-plus contracts because of the Company's ability to negotiate rates and manage costs on those contracts. Revenues are recognized under cost-plus contracts on the basis of direct and indirect costs incurred plus a negotiated profit calculated as a percentage of costs, a fixed amount or as a performance-based award fee. Cost-plus type contracts provide relatively less risk than other contract types because the Company is reimbursed for all direct costs and certain indirect costs, such as overhead and general and administrative expenses, and are paid a fee for work performed. For certain cost-plus contracts, which are referred to as cost-plus award fee or incentive fee type contracts, the Company recognizes the expected fee to be awarded by the customer at the time such fee can be reasonably estimated, based on factors such as the Company's prior award experience and communications with the customer regarding the Company's performance, including any interim performance evaluations rendered by the customer or the Company's average historical award fee rate on similar type contracts. Under substantially all fixed price contracts, which are predominantly level of effort contracts, revenues are recognized using the cost-to-cost method for all services provided. Fixed price contracts that involve a defined number of hours or a defined category of personnel are referred to as "level of effort" contracts. The Company believes the cost-to-cost method is the best estimate for determining performance on these contracts. For product-related fixed price contracts, revenues are recognized as units are delivered (the units-of-delivery method). In addition, the Company evaluates its contracts for multiple deliverables which may require the segmentation of each deliverable into separate accounting units for proper revenue recognition as defined by EITF 00-21. The appropriate revenue recognition method based on applicable accounting guidance is then applied for each separate unit. The Company recognizes revenues under the U.S. federal government contracts when a contract is executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable, delivery of the services or products has occurred, the contract is funded and collectibility of the contract price is considered probable. The Company's contracts with agencies of the federal government are subject to periodic funding by the respective contracting agency. Funding for a contract may be provided in full at inception of the contract or periodically throughout the term of the contract as the services are provided. From time to time the Company may proceed with work on unfunded portions of existing contracts based on customer direction pending finalization and signing of contractual funding documents. The Company has an internal process for approving any such work. All revenue recognition is deferred during periods in which funding is not received. Allowable contract costs incurred during such periods are deferred if the receipt of funding is assessed as probable. In evaluating the probability of funding being received, the Company considers its previous experience with the customer, communications with the customer regarding funding status, and the Company's knowledge of available funding for the contract or program. If funding is not assessed as probable, costs are expensed as incurred. Historically, the Company has not recorded any significant write-offs because funding was not ultimately received. The Company recognizes revenues under its cost based U.S. federal government contracts based on allowable contract costs, as mandated by the U.S. federal government's cost accounting standards. The costs the Company incurs under federal government contracts are subject to regulation and audit by certain agencies of the federal government. Contract cost disallowances, resulting from government audits, have not historically been significant. Contract revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. Examples of such estimates include the level of effort needed to accomplish the tasks under the contract, the cost of those efforts, and a continual assessment of the Company's progress toward the completion of the contract. From time to time, circumstances may arise which require the Company to revise its estimated total revenue or costs. Typically, these revisions relate to contractual changes. To the extent that a revised estimate affects contract revenue or profit previously recognized, the Company records the cumulative effect of the revision in the period in which it becomes known. In addition, the full amount of an anticipated loss on any type of contract is recognized in the period in which it becomes known. The Company may be exposed to variations in profitability if the Company encounters variances from estimated fees earned under award fee contracts and estimated costs under fixed price contracts. Software revenue is generated from licensing software and providing services, including maintenance and technical support, and consulting. The Company recognizes the revenue when the license agreement is signed, the license fee is fixed and determinable, delivery of the software has occurred, and collectibility of the fee is considered probable. The Company's software license sales including maintenance and consulting services are recognized at their fair values when all other recognition criteria are met. Service revenues consist of maintenance and technical support and are recognized ratably over the service period. Other service revenues are recognized as the related services are provided. Revenues from sales of products are generally recognized upon acceptance by the customer, which is typically within thirty days of shipment. Software and related services revenues for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005 were not significant. Amounts collected in advance of being earned are recognized as deferred revenues. (j) Costs of Acquisitions Costs incurred on probable acquisitions are deferred. Costs incurred on successful acquisitions are capitalized as a cost of the acquisition, while costs incurred by the Company for unsuccessful or terminated acquisition opportunities are expensed when the Company determines that the opportunity will no longer be pursued. (k) Income Taxes The Company calculates its income tax provision using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates are recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability of approximately $470,000 for undistributed earnings of its foreign operations that arose in 2005 and prior years because the Company does not expect those unremitted earnings to reverse and become taxable to the Company in the foreseeable future. A deferred tax liability will be recognized when the Company is no longer able to demonstrate that it plans to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 the undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries was approximately $1.2 million and $1.1million, respectively. (l) Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions The balance sheets of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars for consolidated financial statement purposes using the current exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. The revenue and expense accounts of foreign subsidiaries are converted using the weighted average exchange rate during the period. Gains or losses resulting from such translations are included in accumulated comprehensive income in stockholders' equity. Gains and losses from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are included in current period income. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses were not significant for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. (m) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value based method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, ("APB No. 25"), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and Related Interpretations. The Company has an employee stock option plan. Compensation expense for stock options granted to employees is recognized based on the difference, if any, between the fair value of the Company's common stock and the exercise price of the option at the date of grant. The compensation expense is calculated on a straight line basis over the vesting period of the options. No stock-based compensation expense for options granted to employees has been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company discloses the pro forma effect on net income as if the fair value based method of accounting as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation had been applied. The Company accounts for stock options granted to non-employees using the fair value method of accounting as prescribed by SFAS No. 123. Compensation expense related to stock options granted to non-employees is not significant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, to stock-based employee compensation:

(n) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, short term investments, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and indebtedness approximate their fair values as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, due to the relatively short duration of these financial instruments. (o) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Derivative instruments, which are comprised of interest rate swaps, are recognized at fair value in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that qualify as effective hedges of cash flows are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments for all other hedging activities, including the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges, are recognized in current period earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the last of the Company's interest swap agreements matured. (p) Earnings Per Common Share Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares are comprised of the Company's employee stock options and restricted shares. (q) Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the carrying amounts of reported assets and liabilities, including the recoverability of property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, valuation allowances for income taxes and accounts receivable, the valuation of derivative instruments and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (r) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes" and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in an accounting principle and changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting a change in an accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires the retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of the direct effect of a voluntary change in an accounting principle unless it is impracticable. APB No. 20 required that most voluntary changes in an accounting principle be recognized by including the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle in net income for the first quarter of the year for which the change occurred. FASB stated that SFAS No. 154 improves financial reporting because its requirements enhance the consistency of financial information between periods. Unless early adoption is elected, SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements, including those that are in a transition phase as of the effective date of this statement. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this statement will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets. This statement amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 29 to improve financial reporting by eliminating certain narrow differences between the FASB's and the International Accounting Standards Board's (IASB) existing accounting standards for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets. The provisions of this statement shall be prospectively applied and are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company believes the adoption of this statement will have no impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share Based Payment. (SFAS No. 123R), which amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123R requires all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments at fair value, and will be effective for public companies with fiscal years beginning after July 1, 2005. This new standard may be adopted in one of three ways: a) the modified prospective transition method, b) the modified retrospective transition method - the beginning of the annual period of adoption or c) the modified retrospective transition method by restating all periods presented. The Company intends to adopt SFAS No. 123R using the modified retrospective transition method in the first quarter of 2006. (s) Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 and 2003 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to conform to the 2005 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. (t) Customer Concentration Revenues recognized under the one of the Company's task orders under a larger General Service Administration contract accounted for approximately 11% of the Company's revenues in 2005. No other individual task order accounted for more than 10% of the Company's revenues for the three years ended December 31, 2005. (u) Accounting for Leases The Company leases its office facilities under operating leases that expire through various dates through 2019, along with options that permit renewals for additional periods. Rent abatements and escalations are considered in the determination of the straight-line rent expense for operating leases. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the asset life or the lease term. The Company receives incentives to lease office facilities in certain areas. These incentives are recorded as a deferred credit and recognized as a reduction to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. (4) Acquisitions (a) Simulation Technologies, Inc On July 27, 2004, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Simulation Technology Inc., or "STI," a provider of modeling and simulation software solutions and services, based in San Antonio, Texas, for a total purchase price of $15.1 million (net of cash acquired), including transaction costs. The Company financed the acquisition through borrowings under its existing Credit Facility. The net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $2.6 million of contracts and related customer relationships with an expected weighted average useful life of 5 years. The value of the contracts and customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by the Company. Goodwill recognized from this acquisition was approximately $9.5 million and is not deductible for tax purposes. The acquisition did not meet the criteria of a material and significant acquisition, and therefore, pro forma disclosures have not been presented. (b) Integrated Management Services, Inc. On August 11, 2004, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Integrated Management Services, Inc., or "IMSI," a provider of high end, mission critical information and securities solutions, based in Arlington, Virginia, for a total purchase price of $29.0 million, including transaction costs. The Company financed the acquisition through borrowings under its existing Credit Facility. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, the Company may be obligated to pay up to $2.0 million of additional consideration if follow on work related to a certain government contract was awarded in the time frame set forth under the stock purchase agreement. The Company has communicated to the seller of IMSI the Company's determination of the additional consideration the Company believes is due, have received the seller's response and intend to further discuss the matter with the seller. The net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $5.9 million of contracts and related customer relationships with an expected weighted average useful life of 5 years. The value of the contracts and customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by the Company. Goodwill recognized from this acquisition was approximately $20.6 million and is deductible for tax purposes due to the tax code election made at the time of the acquisition. The acquisition did not meet the criteria of a material and significant acquisition, and therefore, pro forma disclosures have not been presented. (c) Milestone Group, LLC. On October 14, 2005, the Company purchased all of the outstanding limited liability membership interests of Milestone Group, LLC, or "Milestone," a provider of IT professional services, based in Arlington, Virginia, for a total purchase price of $30.9 million, including transaction costs. The Company financed the acquisition through cash-on-hand and proceeds from the sales of short term investments. The transaction was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, whereby the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The identifiable intangible assets consisted of $10.5 million of contracts and related customer relationships with an expected weighted average useful life of 8 years. The value of the contracts and customer relationships is based, in part, on an independent appraisal and other studies performed by the Company. Goodwill recognized from this acquisition was approximately $18.9 million and is deductible for tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill arising from the transaction is not being amortized. Pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the effect of the acquisition did not meet the criteria of a significant acquisition, and therefore, pro forma disclosures have not been presented. (5) Accounts Receivable The components of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, are as follows (in thousands): 2005 2004 ------------ ------------ Billed and billable $ 275,015 $ 265,359 Unbilled 54,539 48,103 Retainages due upon contract completion 7,040 8,369 ------------ ------------ Allowance for doubtful accounts (4,785) (4,535) ------------ ------------ Total $ 331,809 $ 317,296 ============= ============ In excess of 98% of the Company's revenues for each of 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been earned, and accounts receivable as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are due, from agencies of the U.S. federal government. Unbilled costs and fees and retainages billable upon completion of contracts are amounts due generally within one year and will be billed on the basis of contract terms and delivery schedules. The accuracy and appropriateness of the Company's direct and indirect costs and expenses under its government contracts and, therefore, its accounts receivable recorded pursuant to such contracts, are subject to extensive regulation and audit, including by the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA") or by other appropriate agencies of the U.S. government. Such agencies have the right to challenge the Company's cost estimates or allocations with respect to any government contract. Additionally, a substantial portion of the payments to the Company under government contracts are provisional payments that are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies. Incurred cost audits have been completed by DCAA through 2003. Historically, such audits have not resulted in any significant disallowed costs. Although the Company can give no assurances, in the opinion of management, any adjustments likely to result from inquiries or audits of its contracts will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. (6) Property and Equipment Property and equipment consists of the following as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands): 2005 2004 ------------- ----------- Land $ 393 $ 393 Buildings 1,581 1,581 Computer hardware and software 21,299 20,605 Furniture and equipment 9,932 8,487 Leasehold improvements 10,815 8,384 ------------- ----------- Subtotal 44,020 39,450 Less -accumulated depreciation and amortization (28,913) (26,530) ------------- ----------- Total $ 15,107 $ 12,920 ============= =========== (7) Accrued Expenses The components of accrued expenses as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands): 2005 2004 ------------- ----------- Accrued payroll and related benefits $ 56,040 $ 48,791 Accrued subcontractor costs 46,180 47,446 Accrued interest 58 22 Other accrued expenses 8,360 6,334 ------------- ----------- Total $ 110,638 $ 102,593 ============= =========== (8) Indebtedness (a) Credit Agreement On June 23, 1999, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement ("Credit Facility") with a syndicate of nine commercial banks. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company entered into promissory notes with aggregate available financing facilities of $180.0 million. The Credit Facility was comprised of a revolving credit facility for aggregate borrowings of up to $120.0 million ("Revolving Facility"), as determined based on a portion of eligible billed accounts receivable and a portion of eligible unbilled accounts receivable and the ratio of net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), as defined in the Credit Facility, and maturing on June 23, 2005; and a $60.0 million note ("Term Loan A") with principal payments due quarterly commencing June 30, 2001, and $15.0 million at maturity on June 23, 2005. Effective October 21, 2002, this Credit Facility was replaced by an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as discussed below. Under the Credit Facility, the interest rate on both the Revolving Facility and the Term Loan was at a floating rate based upon, at the Company's option, LIBOR, or the Alternate Base Rate ("ABR"), which was the higher of Credit Suisse First Boston's ("CSFB") prime rate (less one quarter of one percent) and the Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus one half of one percent, in each case plus a margin determined based on the Company's ratio of net debt to EBITDA. (b) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of October 21, 2002 On October 21, 2002, the Company entered into an amendment and restatement of its existing Credit Agreement (the "2002 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the Credit Facility was amended to allow for the following: (1) a $200.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"); and (2) a $22.3 million three-year senior secured term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility"). The aggregate amount available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility was determined based on a portion of eligible accounts receivable. In general, the Company's borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was subject to its borrowing base (defined as portions of eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable) and the Company's ratio of net debt to EBITDA and net senior debt to EBITDA, as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility would have matured on June 30, 2005. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility bore interest at a floating rate based upon, at the Company's option, LIBOR, or the ABR, which is the higher of CSFB prime rate (less one quarter of one percent) and the Federal Funds Effective Rate, plus one half of one percent, in each case plus a margin determined based upon the Company's ratio of net debt to EBITDA (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Effective December 19, 2003, this credit facility was replaced by a further Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as discussed below. (c) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of December 19, 2003 On December 19, 2003, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the "2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") related to its Credit Facility. This amendment and restatement, among other things, provided for the following: (1) a new Term Loan B under the Term Loan Facility in the amount of $150.0 million with a maturity date of December 31, 2010; (2) the extension of the Revolving Credit Facility's maturity date to December 31, 2008; (3) the repayment of the outstanding balance of approximately $18.4 million of the Term Loan A; and (4) the financing of the tender offer and consent solicitation made on November 23, 2003, related to the outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes (see below). In addition, the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement permitted the Company to raise up to $200.0 million of additional debt in the form of additional term loans, subordinated debt or revolving loans, with certain restrictions on the amount of revolving loans. All borrowings under the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were subject to financial covenants customary for such financings, including, but not limited to: maximum ratio of net debt to EBITDA (as defined in the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) and maximum ratio of senior debt to EBITDA. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the aggregate fees the Company paid to non-officer directors exceeded the ceiling limitation set forth in its 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by approximately $20,000, principally because of the timing of such payments. The Company's lenders determined that this limit on aggregate annual non-officer director fees, which originated several years before the Company completed its initial public offering of common stock in March 2002, was not typical for a publicly traded company. Consequently, the Company's lenders granted a waiver for its compliance with this covenant provision for the year ended December 31, 2003 and eliminated this limitation for the remaining term of the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all other covenants required by its 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Additionally, as a result of the changes made in this amendment and restatement, revolving loans were based upon an asset test or maximum ratio of net eligible accounts receivable to revolving loans. From the date of the amendment through December 31, 2003, the interest rates for the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility ranged from 3.16 percent to 5.00 percent. In connection with the repayment of the Term A Loan, the Company wrote off the related unamortized deferred financing fees. The write-off of $485,000 is reflected as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. All of the Company's existing and future domestic subsidiaries unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of amounts borrowed under the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was secured by substantially all of the Company's and its domestic subsidiaries' tangible and intangible assets, including substantially all of the capital stock of the Company's subsidiaries. The 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also permitted the Company to elect from time to time to (i) repurchase certain amounts of its subordinated debt and outstanding common stock from its share of excess cash flow (as defined in the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement); and (ii) repurchase certain amounts of its subordinated debt from its share of net cash proceeds of issuances of equity securities. The 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contained customary events of default, certain of which allow for grace periods. Effective September 30, 2004, this credit facility was amended, as discussed below. (d) Amended Credit Agreement of September 30, 2004 On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into a second amendment to the 2003 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. This amendment provided an additional $16.1 million of borrowings by increasing the Term Loan B to $165.0 million, and lowered the interest rates on Term B borrowings by 0.25%. Under certain conditions related to excess annual cash flow, as defined in its Credit Facility, and the receipt of proceeds from certain asset sales and debt or equity issuances, the Company is required to prepay, in amounts specified in the Credit Facility, borrowings under the Term Loan B. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company did not have to prepay amounts specified in the Credit Facility as related to excess annual cash flow. In addition, the Company is scheduled to pay quarterly installments of $412,500 under the Term Loan B until the Credit Facility matures on December 31, 2010. From January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the interest rates for the Term Loan B Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility ranged from 4.31 percent to 6.14 percent and 6.00 percent to 8.00 percent, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, interest expense on the unused portion of the commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility was not significant. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the outstanding amounts under the Credit Facility were as follows (in thousands): 2005 2004 ------------- ----------- Revolving Credit Facility $ -- $ 19,800 Term Loan B 162,938 164,588 ------------- ----------- Total debt 162,938 184,388 Less current installments (1,650) (1,650) ------------- ----------- Long-term debt, excluding current installments $ 161,288 $ 182,738 ============= =========== The remaining available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2005 were $194.8 million. As of December 31, 2005, the Credit Facility would have permitted additional borrowings of up to $488.1 million. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, total interest expense incurred on the Revolving Credit Facility was approximately $800,000, $1.1 million, and $1.9 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2003, total interest expense incurred on the Term Loan A was approximately $700,000. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, total interest expense incurred on the Term Loan B was approximately $8.4 million and $5.3 million, respectively. (e) Senior Subordinated Notes Payable On May 11, 1999, the Company sold $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 12% senior subordinated notes due 2009, or "12% Notes." The proceeds of the issuance of the 12% Notes were principally used to finance certain acquisitions. The 12% Notes were subordinate to the Company's Credit Facility but ranked senior to any other subordinated indebtedness. The 12% Notes were scheduled to mature May 15, 2009 and interest was payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The Company used net proceeds from its initial public offering ("IPO") in March 2002 to redeem $25.0 million principal amount of its 12% Notes on April 15, 2002. In addition, as a result of the redemption of the $25.0 million principal amount of the Company's 12% Notes, the Company incurred a $3.0 million prepayment premium and wrote-off a proportionate amount of approximately $928,000 of the unamortized deferred financing fees related to the portion of the 12% Notes that were repaid. The prepayment premium and write-off of deferred financing fees for both the term loan and the 12% Notes totaling $4.2 million, has been reflected as interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002. On December 23, 2003, the Company repurchased $73.1 million in aggregate principal amount, or approximately 97% of the then outstanding 12% Notes. As of the expiration date of the tender offer and December 31, 2003, approximately $1.9 million in aggregate principal amount remained outstanding, which was callable on May 15, 2004. The repurchase price for the 12% Notes was $1,110.95 per $1,000 principal amount of Notes tendered prior to December 5, 2003, the Consent Date. The repurchase price for those Notes tendered after December 5, 2003 was $1,090.95 per $1,000 principal amount of the 12% Notes, which excludes the consent payment of $20.0 per $1,000 principal amount. The aggregate repurchase price for all of the 12% Notes validly surrendered for repurchase and not withdrawn was approximately $81.2 million. In addition, as a result of the tender offer, the Company incurred a $7.2 million bond premium and consent payment and wrote-off approximately $2.1 million of the unamortized deferred financing fees related to the portion of the 12% Notes that were repurchased. The tender premium, consent payment and write-off of deferred financing fees has been reflected as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. In June 2004, the Company repurchased the remaining $1.9 million principal amount of the outstanding 12% Notes. In conjunction with the repurchase, the Company paid a tender premium of approximately $113,000 which was included in interest expense. Total interest expense for the 12% Notes incurred during 2004 and 2003 was approximately $113,000, and $8.8 million, respectively. (f) Subordinated Notes Payable In connection with the purchase of Sherikon, Inc. in 2000, the Company entered into subordinated promissory notes with the Sherikon, Inc. shareholders as of the date of acquisition in the aggregate principal amount of $7.5 million, discounted to approximately $6.5 million. During 2001, $5.0 million of the subordinated promissory notes were repaid. The remaining $2.5 million of subordinated promissory notes were due on October 20, 2002. On October 18, 2002, the Company asserted an indemnification claim against the former owners of Sherikon, Inc. in an aggregate amount exceeding the $2.5 million promissory note. The Company had not made this $2.5 million scheduled payment pending resolution of the indemnification claim; however, $124,000 of interest was accrued and outstanding as of December 31, 2003. On July 26, 2004, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the former owners of Sherikon, Inc. resolving, among other items, the Company's indemnification claim submitted in October 2002. Under the provisions of the settlement agreement, the principal amount of the note was reduced from $2.5 million to $1.35 million, and the Company paid the reduced note amount, without interest. The Company recognized $899,000 in other income consisting of the $1.15 million reduction in the promissory note amount plus previously accrued interest net of legal expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, total interest expense on the subordinated promissory notes with the Sherikon, Inc. shareholders was approximately zero and $124,000, respectively. (g) Future Maturities Scheduled future maturities under the Company's indebtedness are as follows (in thousands): Year Ending December 31, 2006 $ 1,650 2007 1,650 2008 1,650 2009 1,650 2010 156,338 ------------ $ 162,938 ============ (h) Interest Rate Swap Agreements Prior to 2005, the Company hedged a portion of its longer-term variable interest payments under its Credit Facility to manage cash flow fluctuations. To do so, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts to change the variable-rate cash flow exposure to fixed-rate cash flows. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the last of the Company's interest rate swap agreements, with a notional value of $10.0 million, matured. The Company recognized $230,000 of losses related to interest rate swaps which was reflected in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004. (9) Capital Stock The Company's authorized capital stock currently consists of 175,000,000 shares of common stock and 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all directors then being elected. The holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to receive dividends, when, and if declared by the Company's board out of legally available funds. Upon the Company's liquidation or dissolution, the holders of common stock will be entitled to share ratably in the Company's assets legally available for distribution to stockholders after payment of liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any holders of preferred stock then outstanding. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock, which may be issued in the future. On September 9, 2004, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC to register an additional 1.5 million shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under its Amended and Restated Anteon International Corporation Omnibus Stock Plan ("Omnibus Stock Plan"), as amended. This increase in the number of shares available for issuance under the Omnibus Stock Plan was approved by the Company's stockholders on May 27, 2004. On August 11, 2005, the Company awarded 1,000 restricted shares of its common stock to each of eight non-employee members of its Board of Directors pursuant to the Omnibus Stock Plan. On October 17, 2005, one of the directors resigned and forfeited his 1,000 shares of the Company's restricted stock that he held at the time. The shares vest over a twenty-one month period based on continued service as a Director. Preferred Stock The Company's preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Company's board is authorized to fix the dividend rights, dividend rates, any conversion rights or right of exchange, any voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, the redemption price or prices, the payments in the event of liquidation, and any other rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of any series of preferred stock and the number of shares constituting such series and their designation. The Company has no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. Rights Agreement In connection with the Company's IPO, the Company distributed one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock to the stockholders of record on that date (the "Rights Agreement"). Under the Company's Rights Agreement, each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $76.50 per one one-thousandth of a share, under certain circumstances provided for in the Rights Agreement. Until a "separation date" (as defined in the Rights Agreement) occurs, the rights will: o Not be exercisable; o Be evidenced by certificates that represent shares of the Company's common stock; and o Trade with the Company's common stock. The rights will expire at the close of business on the ten-year anniversary of the Rights Agreement, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company. (10) Income Taxes The provisions for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, consist of the following (in thousands), respectively: Years ended December 31, ------------------------------------------ 2005 2004 2003 ----------- ------------ ----------- Current provision: Federal $ 44,054 $ 29,320 $ 21,718 State 5,956 4,653 2,305 Foreign 124 66 121 ----------- ------------ ----------- Total current provision 50,134 34,039 24,144 ----------- ------------ ----------- Deferred provision: Federal (56) 2,823 (1,145) State (2,248) 254 (226) Foreign -- -- -- ----------- ------------ ----------- Total deferred provision (2,304) 3,077 (1,371) ----------- ------------ ----------- Total income tax provision $ 47,830 $ 37,116 $ 22,773 =========== ============ ===========

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies that can be implemented by the Company in making this assessment. Management presently believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the portion of the benefits of these deductible differences related to federal income taxes. The Company has established a valuation allowance as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 of $226,000 and $295,000, respectively, against certain state net operating loss carryforwards which was reduced by $69,000 during 2005. At December 31, 2005, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $21,000 and $5.5 million, respectively. Carryforwards have various expiration dates beginning in 2006. The Company also has various state tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.6 million and $300,000 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which are available to reduce future state income taxes through 2015. (11) Employee Benefit Plans Employees of the Company may participate in a 401(k) retirement savings plan, whereby employees may elect to make contributions pursuant to a salary reduction agreement upon meeting eligibility requirements. Participants may contribute up to 100% percent of salary in any calendar year to this plan, provided that amounts in total do not exceed certain statutory limits. The Company matches up to 50 percent of the first 6 percent of a participant's contributions, subject to certain limitations, and participants immediately vest in the Company's contributions. The Company made contributions to this plan of approximately $13.6 million, $11.7 million, and $8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively. (12) Stock Option and Other Compensation Plans (a) Stock Option Plan In January 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Anteon Virginia Corporation Omnibus Stock Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"). At the discretion of the Board of Directors, the stock option plan permits the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted or unrestricted stock awards, and/or phantom stock to employees or directors of the Company. As of December 31, 2005, an aggregate of 1,649,141 shares of the Company's common stock were reserved for issuance under the stock option plan. The exercise price of stock options granted is the market value of the common stock at the grant date. Prior to the Company's IPO, the exercise price of stock options granted was determined by the Company's Board of Directors but was not to be less than the fair value of the underlying shares of common stock at the grant date. For stock options granted to employees, 20% of the shares subject to the options vest on the first anniversary of the grant date and an additional 20% vest on each succeeding anniversary of the grant date. For options granted from the date of the adoption of the Company's stock option plan until September 21, 2000, employees have a period of three years from the vesting date to exercise the option to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. In 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved that 20 percent of the options issued on the August 1, 1997 grant date vested immediately. On September 21, 2000, the Company's Board of Directors approved that, with respect to stock options granted from that date forward, each grantee has a period of 8 years from the date of grant in which to exercise options which vest. On March 11, 2002, the Company's Board of Directors approved that, with respect to stock options granted from that date forward, each grantee has a period of 10 years from the date of grant in which to exercise options which vest. The following tables summarize information regarding options under the Company's stock option plan:

(b) Employee Stock Purchase Plan Effective April 1, 2004, the Company implemented an Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") to offer eligible employees the opportunity to purchase the Company's common stock at a discount from the market price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. Eligible employees may authorize the Company to deduct a specified portion of their compensation each payroll period for each quarterly offering period. The accumulated payroll deductions will be used by the Company to provide for the purchase by the ESPP administrator of Company common stock for delivery to ESPP participants. These shares may be newly issued shares, treasury shares or shares purchased on the open market or otherwise. The ESPP provides that the per share purchase price discount established by the Compensation Committee of the Board may be no greater than 15% of the fair market value of a share of Company common stock on the last day of each quarterly offering period. The Compensation Committee has set the purchase price discount at 5% of the Company stock's fair market value. Under the ESPP, employees are limited to the purchase of shares of the Company's common stock having a fair market value no greater than $25,000 during any calendar year, as determined on the date of purchase. The Company has filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC to register 1.2 million shares of the Company's common stock under the ESPP. The Company has suspended the ESPP, pending the closing of the Merger with General Dynamics.

(c) Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan Effective January 1, 2004, the Company implemented a Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (the "Plan") that permits eligible employees and directors to defer all or a portion of their annual cash compensation. The Company also filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to register the participation interests under the Plan. The assets of the Plan are held in a trust to which contributions are made by the Company based on amounts elected to be deferred by the Plan participants. The Plan is treated as unfunded for tax purposes and its assets are subject to the general claims of the Company's creditors. In order to provide for an accumulation of assets comparable to the contractual liabilities accruing under the Plan, the Company may direct the trustee of the Plan to invest the assets to correspond to the hypothetical investment choices made by the Plan participants. The Company records both the assets and obligations related to amounts deferred under the Plan. Each reporting period, the assets, which have been classified as trading securities and have been included in Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and obligations, are adjusted to fair market value, with gains (losses) on the assets included in other income (expense) and corresponding adjustments to the obligations recorded as compensation expense. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the deferred compensation obligation was approximately $2.0 million and $808,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the adjustments to fair market value were not significant. (d) Pro Forma Disclosure The Company applies APB No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the Company stock option plan. Adoption of the fair market value provisions prescribed in SFAS No. 123 is optional with respect to stock-based compensation to employees; however, pro forma disclosures are required as if the Company adopted the fair value recognition requirements under SFAS No. 123. Had compensation cost for the grants under the Company stock option plan been determined consistent with the fair market value provisions prescribed in SFAS No. 123, the Company's pro forma net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 would approximate $75.2 million, $58.0 million, and $32.9 million, respectively, using an expected option life of 5, 5, and 5 years, respectively, dividend yield rate of 0% and weighted average volatility rates of 32.8%, 33.8%, and 45.8%, respectively, and weighted average risk-free interest rates of 3.85%, 3.33%, and 3.03% for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively (see note 2(m)). The Company believes that the effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. (13) Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income includes the accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment and changes in the fair values of interest rate swaps. The Company presents comprehensive income as a component of the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income. The amount of accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment was approximately $13,000 and $254,000 as of December 31, 2005, 2004, respectively. (14) Earnings Per Common Share The computations of basic and diluted income per common share are as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 Weighted Average Income Shares Per Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (in thousands, except share and per share data) Basic earnings per share $ 78,708 36,810,863 $ 2.14 =========== ========== Stock options 999,281 Diluted earnings per share $ 78,708 37,810,144 $ 2.08 =========== ========== For the year ended December 31, 2004 Weighted Average Income Shares Per Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (in thousands, except share and per share data) Basic earnings per share $ 61,805 35,716,669 $ 1.73 =========== ========== Stock options 1,550,706 Diluted earnings per share $ 61,805 37,267,375 $ 1.66 =========== ========== For the year ended December 31, 2003 Weighted Average Income Shares Per Share (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (in thousands, except share and per share data) Basic earnings per share $ 36,190 34,851,281 $ 1.04 =========== ========== Stock options 2,074,207 Diluted earnings per share $ 36,190 36,925,488 $ 0.98 =========== ========== Commitments and Contingencies (a) Leases The Company is obligated under capital leases covering certain property and equipment that expire at various dates during the next five years. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the gross amount of property and equipment and related accumulated amortization recorded under capital leases were as follows (in thousands): 2005 2004 ----------- -------------- Property and equipment $ 643 $ 1,044 Less Accumulated amortization (333) (580) ----------- -------------- $ 310 $ 464 ============= ============== Amortization of assets held under capital leases is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company also leases facilities and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through 2019. These leases generally contain renewal options for periods ranging from 3 to 5 years, and require the Company to pay all executory costs such as maintenance, taxes, and insurance. As of December 31, 2005, the aggregate minimum annual rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

Rent expense under all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $35.3 million, $33.1 million, and $25.4 million, respectively. (b) Legal Proceedings On November 4, 2005, the Company received a Customs Export Enforcement Subpoena for documents from United States Customs Service. The subpoena requested the production of records and information in connection with two of the Company's programs, and a description of the Company's export compliance program. The Company produced documents responsive to the subpoena in November and December 2005 and the matter is on-going. Although the Company cannot predict the outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe that it will have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management of the Company and its legal counsel cannot currently predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, but do not believe that they will have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. (16) Secondary Offering Expenses On October 29, 2004, affiliates of and companies managed by Caxton-Iseman Capital, Inc. including Azimuth Technologies, L.P. Azimuth Tech. II LLC and Frederick J. Iseman, which we refer to collectively as the "Caxton-Iseman Stockholders", sold 3,600,000 shares of the Company's common stock in an underwritten offering pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC (Commission File No. 333-111249). Neither the Company nor any of its executive officers participated in the sale of shares in this offering. In connection with this offering, the Company incurred $240,000 of expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004, for which the Company was not reimbursed in accordance with the terms of the registrations rights agreement with certain of its stockholders, as amended. On December 17, 2003, the Company registered approximately 11.1 million shares of its common stock for sale in an underwritten offering pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC which was declared effective. These securities may be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. On September 22, 2003, certain of the Company's stockholders, including Caxton-Iseman stockholders, sold 6,600,000 shares of the Company's common stock in an underwritten offering pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC (Commission File No.s 333-108147 and 333-108858). In the fourth quarter of 2003, the underwriters of this offering partially exercised their over-allotment option with respect to additional shares held by the selling stockholders. As a result, on October 16, 2003, certain of the selling stockholders sold an additional 297,229 shares of the Company's common stock in a second closing pursuant to the same underwritten offering. In connection with this offering, the Company incurred approximately $852,000 of expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003. These expenses were reimbursed by certain of the selling stockholders and the reimbursement was recorded by the Company as an expense and as a contribution to additional paid-in-capital. (17) Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) The following summarizes the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share data):

(18) Segment Reporting Although the Company is organized by strategic business units, the Company considers each of its government contracting units to have similar economic characteristics, provide similar types of services, and have a similar customer base. Accordingly, the Company's government contracting segment aggregates the operations of all of the Company's government contracting units.

ANTEON INTERNATIONAL CORP 10-K