UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): ~~April~~August 191, ~~2010~~2012

OXFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



DELAWARE	000-49854	04-3615974
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)



80 Wall Street, Suite 818, New York, New York		10005
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(212) 809-1200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below):


¨	Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


¨	Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


¨	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


¨	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 4.0201 ~~Non-Reliance~~Changes onin ~~Previously~~Registrant's ~~Issued~~Certifying ~~Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review~~Accountant.

a) On ~~April~~or 15about August 1, ~~2010~~2012, inChild, ~~the~~Van ~~course~~Wagoner of& ~~preparing~~Bradshaw, ~~its~~PLLC ~~consolidated~~(“CVB”), ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~principal accountant for Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the ~~year~~"Company") ~~ended~~ceased ~~December~~its ~~31,~~accounting ~~2009,~~practice ~~Oxford~~for ~~Technologies,~~SEC ~~Inc~~reporting companies. (At or about the same time Anderson Bradshaw PLLC (“~~Company~~Anderson Bradshaw”) ~~discovered~~was established as a ~~material~~successor ~~error~~firm ~~while~~to itCVB ~~was~~to ~~transitioning~~continue ~~/integrating~~performing ~~into~~audits afor ~~new~~SEC ~~accounting~~reporting ~~system~~companies. As AAnderson ~~variance~~Bradshaw ~~was~~is ~~noted~~viewed inas ~~the~~a ~~amount~~separate oflegal ~~WIP~~entity, ~~being~~the ~~reported~~Company indismissed ~~the~~CVB ~~old~~as ~~accounting~~its ~~system.~~principal ~~After~~accountant ~~further~~and ~~investigation~~engaged Anderson Bradshaw, itas ~~was~~the ~~discovered~~Company's ~~that~~principal aaccountant ~~2008~~for the Company's fiscal year ending ~~WIP~~December ~~balance~~31, ~~was~~2012 ~~overstated~~and bythe ~~approximately~~interim ~~$424,000~~periods for 2012 and 2013. The ~~error~~decision ~~had~~to ~~the~~change ~~effect~~principal ofaccountants ~~overstating~~was ~~income~~approved ~~and~~by ~~stockholders’~~the ~~equity~~Company's byBoard ~~approximately~~of ~~$424,000~~Directors.

~~Upon~~None ~~the recommendation~~ of ~~management~~the ~~and~~reports ~~after discussion with our independent registered public accounting firm~~of CVB, ~~Child, Van Wagoner & Bradshaw, PLLC,~~ on ~~April 15, 2010,~~ the ~~Board of Directors of the~~ Company's ~~determined that the previously issued~~ financial statements ~~of the Company~~ for ~~the~~either ~~quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2009 should no longer be relied upon. In view~~ of the ~~error,~~past ~~the~~two ~~Company~~years ~~has~~or ~~restated~~subsequent ~~its~~interim ~~previously~~period ~~issued~~contained ~~financial~~an ~~statements~~adverse ~~for~~opinion ~~the~~or ~~year~~disclaimer ~~ended~~of ~~December 31~~opinion, ~~2008~~or inwas ~~its~~qualified ~~Annual~~or ~~Report~~modified onas ~~Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, in which a restatement footnote had been added~~ to ~~the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31~~uncertainty, ~~2009~~audit ~~which~~scope ~~described~~or ~~the~~accounting ~~restatement and demonstrated the impact of the restatement on each line item in the Company’s consolidated financial statements that was affected thereby~~principles.

~~The~~There were no disagreements between the Company ~~will~~and ~~file~~CVB, asfor ~~promptly~~the astwo ~~practicable,~~most ~~amendments~~recent tofiscal ~~its~~years ~~quarterly~~and ~~reports~~any subsequent interim period through August 1, 2012 (date of dismissal) on ~~Form~~any ~~10-Qs~~matter ~~for~~of ~~the~~accounting ~~quarters~~principles ~~ended~~or ~~March~~practices, 31financial statement disclosure, ~~June~~or 30auditing scope or procedure, ~~and~~which, ~~September~~if 30not resolved to the satisfaction of CVB, ~~2009~~would have caused them to ~~reflect~~make reference to the ~~restatement~~subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report. Further, CVB has not advised the Registrant that:

~~ITEM~~1) ~~9.01.~~internal ~~FINANCIAL~~controls ~~STATEMENTS~~necessary ~~AND~~to ~~EXHIBITS~~develop reliable financial statements did not exist; or

(d2) ~~Exhibits None~~ information has come to the attention of CVB which made it unwilling to rely upon management's representations, or made it unwilling to be associated with the financial statements prepared by management; or

~~SIGNATURES~~3) the scope of the audit should be expanded significantly, or information has come to the attention of CVB that they have concluded will, or if further investigated, might materially impact the fairness or reliability of a previously issued audit report or the underlying financial statements, or the financial statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

~~Pursuant~~ (b) On or about August 1, 2012 the Registrant engaged Anderson Bradshaw as its principal accountant to audit the ~~requirements~~Registrant's offinancial statements as successor to CVB. During the ~~Securities~~Registrant's ~~Exchange~~two ~~Act~~most ofrecent ~~1934~~fiscal years or subsequent interim period, the ~~registrant~~Registrant has ~~duly~~not ~~caused~~consulted ~~this~~with ~~report~~the entity of Anderson Bradshaw regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be ~~signed~~rendered on ~~its~~the ~~behalf~~Registrant's financial statements, nor did the entity of Anderson Bradshaw provide advice to the Registrant, either written or oral, that was an important factor considered by the ~~undersigned~~Registrant ~~hereunto~~in ~~duly~~reaching ~~authorized~~a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.

	OXFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Date: April 19, 2010	By:	/s/Vivian Lam Lee Yu
	Name:	Vivian Lam Lee Yu
	Title:	President

Further, during the Registrant's two most recent fiscal years or subsequent interim period, the Registrant has not consulted the entity of Anderson Bradshaw on any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event.

The Company has provided CVB with a copy of this Current Report on Form 8-K. A copy of CVB’s letter, dated August 1, 2012, is attached hereto as Exhibit 16.1.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

Exhibit

Number Descriptions

16.1 Letter from CVB dated August 1, 2012 regarding change in certifying accountant

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



	OXFORD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: August 2, 2012	By:	/s/ Vivian Lam
	Name:	Vivian Lam
	Title:	President

Filing Compare · OXFORD TECHNOLOGIES INC