UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.

Commission file number: 000-52854

FBC HOLDING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	71-1026782 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
60 Cedar Lake West Denville, NJ (Address of principal executive offices)	07834 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (201) 213-2504

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Applicable only to issuers involved in bankruptcy proceedings during the preceding five years:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes o No o

Applicable only to corporate issuers:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of ~~January~~March 1418, 2013, there were 338,~~956~~366,~~339,123~~ 153 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding.

Table of Contents

FBC HOLDING, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 1	Financial Statements	4
ITEM 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
ITEM 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	1615
ITEM 4	Controls and Procedures	16
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		18
ITEM 1	Legal Proceedings	18
ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	18
ITEM 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	1821
ITEM 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2023
ITEM 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	2023
ITEM 5	Other Information	2023
ITEM 6	Exhibits	2124

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “consider,” or similar expressions are used.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

Table of Contents

ITEM 1 Financial Statements

FBC Holding, Inc.

FBC Holding Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	January 31, 2013			July 31, 2012
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS

Current Assets
Cash	$	1,360		$	2,877
Total Current Assets		1,360			2,877
Other Assets		41,592			-
Total Assets	$	42,952		$	2,877

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable		300,532			282,352
Accrued Interest		527,135			460,657
Equity Obligations		1,466,039			1,641,307
Convertible Notes Payable		751,249			604,083
Derivative Liability		888,003			983,346
Total Current Liabilities		3,932,958			3,971,745

Total Liabilities		3,932,958			3,971,745

Stockholders’ Deficit *
Preferred Stock .001 Par Value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 2,500,000 issued and outstanding, Series A preferred		2,500			2,500
Common Stock .001 Par Value; 5,000,000,000 shares authorized; 7,912,678 and 4,432,451 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		7,913			4,432
Additional paid in capital		20,183,751			20,011,964
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(24,084,170	)		(23,987,764	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(3,890,006	)		(3,968,868	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	42,952		$	2,877

(A* ~~Development~~Retroactively ~~Stage~~restated ~~Company)~~common stock for 1 for 500 reverse stock split approved December 26, 2012. See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	October 31, 2012			July 31, 2012
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	10		$	2,877
Total Current Assets		10			2,877
Total Assets	$	10		$	2,877
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable		275,052			282,352
Accrued Interest		492,306			460,657
Equity Obligations		1,516,201			1,641,307
Convertible Notes Payable		655,629			604,083
Derivative Liability		938,165			983,346
Total Current Liabilities		3,877,353			3,971,745
Total Liabilities		3,877,353			3,971,745
Stockholders Deficit
Preferred Stock .001 Par Value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 2,500,000 issued and outstanding, Series A preferred		2,500			2,500
Common Stock .001 Par Value; 5,000,000,000 shares authorized; 2,651,536,727 and 2,216,225,459 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		2,651,536			2,216,225
Additional paid in capital		17,489,966			17,800,171
Defitcit accumlated during the development stage		(24,021,345	)		(23,987,764	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(3,877,343	)		(3,968,868	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	10		$	2,877

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

FBC HOLDING, Inc.

FBC HOLDING INC
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
	For the Three Months Ended January 31,						For the Six Months Ended January 31,						May 30, 2006
	For the Three Months Ended January 31,						For the Six Months Ended January 31,						(inception) through
		2013			2012			2013			2012		January 31, 2013
Revenue	$	-		$	19,000		$	-		$	33,500		$	33,500
Cost of sales		-						-						18,186
		-			19,000			-			33,500			15,314
Expenses
General Selling and Administrative		60,558			48,723			155,755			120,706			2,434,431
Depreciation		-			-			-			-			1,889
Warrant Expense		-			-			-			-			861,694
Conversion Fee		-			57,300			-			57,300			1,631,500
Land Claim Fees		-			-			-			-			597,957
Non Cash Compensation		-			17,221			-			17,221			12,614,337
Amortization of Deferred Finance Charges		-			-			-			-			533,668
Impairment of Goodwill														2,236,667
		60,558			123,244			155,755			195,227			20,912,143
Gain(Loss) on Operations		(60,558	)		(104,244	)		(155,755	)		(161,727	)		(20,896,829	)

Other Income (expense)
Change in Derivative Liability		50,162			-			95,343			-			(534,480	)
Legal Settlement														(40,000	)
Amortization of Debt Discount								(14,220	)					(2,001,721	)
Interest Expense		(13,082	)		(3,000	)		(21,774	)		(6,578	)		(626,733	)
		37,080			(3,000	)		59,349			(6,578	)		(3,202,934	)
Net Income (Loss) before provision for income tax		(23,478	)		(107,244	)		(96,406	)		(168,305	)		(24,099,763	)
Provision for income tax		-			-			-			-			-

Net Income(Loss) from Continuing Operations		(23,478	)		(107,244	)		(96,406	)		(168,305	)		(24,099,763	)

Discontinued Operations: Gain (Loss) from discontinued operations (including gain on disposal in 2007 of $28,553), net of tax		-			-			-			-			15,593

Net Income (Loss)	$	(23,478	)	$	(107,244	)	$	(96,406	)	$	(168,305	)	$	(24,084,170	)

Net Income(Loss) per share Basic and Fully Diluted, From:

Continuing operations	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.83	)
Discontinued operations		-
Combined	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.83	)


Weighted Average Number of Common Shares*		4,438,497			201,821			4,867,763			201,821

(A* ~~Development~~retroactively ~~Stage~~restated ~~Company)~~common stock for 1 for 500 reverse stock split approved December 26, 2012. See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						May 30, 2006
	October 31,						(inception) through
	2012			2011			October 31, 2012
Revenue	$	-		$	14,500		$	33,500
Cost of sales		-						18,186
		-			14,500			15,314
Expenses
General Selling and Adminstrative		39,990			68,405			2,318,666
Depreciation		-			-			1,889
Warrant Expense		-			-			861,694
Conversion Fee		-			-			1,631,500
Land Claim Fees		-			-			597,957
Non Cash Compensation		-			-			12,614,337
Amortization of Deferred Finance Charges		-			-			533,668
Impairment of Goodwill		-			-			2,236,667
		39,990			68,405			20,796,378
Gain(Loss) on Operations		(39,990	)		(53,905	)		(20,781,064	)
Other Income (expense)
Change in Derivative Liability		45,181			-			(584,642	)
Legal Settlement		-			-			(40,000	)
Amortization of Debt Discount		(14,220	)		-			(2,001,721	)
Interest Expense		(24,552	)		(7,156	)		(629,511	)
		6,409			(7,156	)		(3,255,874	)
Net Income (Loss) before provision for income tax		(33,581	)		(61,061	)		(24,036,938	)
Provision for income tax		-			-			-
Net Income(Loss) from Continuing Operations		(33,581	)		(61,061	)		(24,036,938	)
Discontinued Operations: Gain (Loss) from discontinued operations (including gain on disposal in 2007 of $28,553), net of tax		-			-			15,593
Net Income (Loss)	$	(33,581	)	$	(61,061	)	$	(24,021,345	)
Net Income(Loss) per share Basic and Fully Diluted, From:
Continuing operations	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Discontinuted operations		-			-
Combined	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares		2,433,881,093			389,184,198

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

FBC Holding, Inc.

FBC Holding Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended January 31,						May 30, 2006 inception through January 31, 2013
	For the Three Months Ended January 31,
	2013			2012
Cash flow from operating Activity:
Operating activity from continuing operations
Net Loss	$	(96,406	)	$	(168,305	)	$	(24,084,170	)
Less: Loss from discontinued operations		-			-			(15,593	)
Net loss from continuing operations		(96,406	)		(168,305	)		(24,099,763	)

Adjustments:
Stock issued for services		-			17,221			14,640,859
Impairment of goodwill		-			-			1,998,131
Conversion Fee		-			57,300			1,703,665
Amortization of debt discount		51,546			-			559,252
Depreciation		-			-			1,062
Change in derivative		(95,343	)					534,480
Deferred financing fees		-			-			391,807

Changes in assets & liabilities from continuing operations:
Prepaids and Other		(41,592	)		(17,000	)		66,908
Accounts Payable		18,180			-			291,399
Accrued Expenses		66,478			6,578			523,831
Cash flow from operating activities by continuing operations		(97,137	)		(104,206	)		(3,388,369	)

Cash Flow from investing activities
Purchase of fixed assets		-			-			(2,259	)
Net cash provided by (used for) from investing activities		-			-			(2,259	)

Cash Flow from Financing activities
Notes payable - borrowings		95,620			96,500			2,482,143
Notes payable - payments		-			-			(8,847	)
Issuance of stock		-			-			918,692
Net cash provided by (used for) from financing activities		95,620			96,500			3,391,988

Net cash used in continuing operations		(1,517	)		(7,706	)		1,360

Cash Flow from discontinued operations		-			-			-

Net change in cash		(1,517	)		(7,706	)		1,360

Beginning cash		2,877			9,438

Ending cash	$	1,360		$	1,732		$	1,360



Supplemental Disclosures
Cash Paid For:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	3,304
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-


Non-cash Transactions
During the year ended July 31, 2011, the Company issued 25,000,000 shares of common stock for acquired assets as follows:
Assets acquired								1,278,131
Impairment of goodwill								(1,250,000	)
Expenses of acquisition								(28,131	)
Assets reported July 31, 2011	$	-		$	-		$	-

Preferred stock issued in exchange for debt	$	-		$	-		$	1,612,062
Common stock issued in exchange for debt	$	175,268		$	-		$	382,888

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						May 30, 2006
	October 31,						inception through
	2012			2011			October 31, 2012
Cash flow from operating Activity:
Operating activity from continuing operations
Net Loss	$	(33,581	)	$	(61,061	)	$	(24,021,345	)
Less: Gain from discontinued operations		-			-			15,593
Net loss from continuing operations		(33,581	)		(61,061	)		(24,036,938	)
Adustments:
Stock issued for services		-			17,221			14,626,163
Impairment of goodwill		-			-			1,998,131
Conversion Fee		-			-			1,703,665
Amortization of debt discount		14,220			-			521,926
Depreciation		-			-			1,062
Change in derivative		(45,181	)					584,642
Deferred financing fees		-			-			391,807
Changes in assets & liabilities from continuing operations:
Prepaids		-			(17,000	)		108,500
Accounts Payable		(7,300	)		-			275,052
Accrued Expenses		31,649			3,578			492,306
Cash flow from operating activities by continuing operations		(40,193	)		(57,262	)		(3,333,684	)
Cash Flow from investing activities
Purchase of fixed assets		-			-			-
Net cash provided by (used for) from investing activities		-			-			-
Cash Flow from Financing activities
Notes payable - borrowings		37,326			52,500			2,423,849
Notes payable - payments		-			-			(8,847	)
Issuance of stock		-			-			918,692
Net cash provided by (used for) from financing activities		37,326			52,500			3,333,694
Net cash used in continuing operations		(2,867	)		(4,762	)		10
Cash Flow from discontinued operations		-			-			-
Net change in cash		(2,867	)		(4,762	)		10
Beginning cash		2,877			9,438
Ending cash	$	10		$	4,676		$	10
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash Paid For:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	3,304
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Non-cash Transactions
During the year ended July 31, 2011, the Company issued 25,000,000 shares of common stock for acquired assets as follows:
Assets acquired	$	-		$	-			1,278,131
Impairment of goodwill		-			-			(1,250,000	)
Expenses of acquisition		-			-			(28,131	)
Assets reported July 31, 2011	$	-		$	-		$	-
Preferred stock issued in exchange for debt	$	-		$	-		$	1,612,062
Common stock issued in exchange for debt	$	125,106		$	-		$	332,726

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

FBC Holding Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Three and Six ~~Nine~~ Months Ended January ~~October~~ 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Historically, FBC Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), was incorporated as Wave Uranium Holding and its business was to acquire mineral land positions. In October 2009 the Company was re-domiciled as a Nevada corporation under the name FBC Holding Corp. On July 21, 2009, the Company entered into an acquisition agreement to purchase FBC Holdings, Inc., a California corporation ("FBC Holdings, Inc. - California"), at which time the Company abandoned its former business plan in the industry of mining and land acquisition. FBC Holdings, Inc. - - California had no material activity up to the agreement date and no material assets or liabilities. The acquisition agreement called for the Company to purchase FBC Holdings, Inc. - California by acquiring all the outstanding shares of FBC Holdings, Inc. - California in exchange for 8 million shares of the Company. The stock was issued in November 2009. The new entity was to focus in three areas: (i) branding (product placement) in television production, movies, etc.; (ii) the sale of mini-choppers and the associated merchandise of the brand Beverly Hills Choppers, including clothing, accessories, parts, etc.; and (iii) internet platforms focused on social networking and the database built around the Johnny Fratto Social Club. The acquisition did not work out according to the Company’s plan and the Company returned all interest in FBC Holdings, Inc. – California, in exchange for the return for return of all the 8 million shares of the Company’s common stock. On August 11, 2010, the Company signed an Asset Purchase Agreement with Super Rad Corporation. Under the agreement the Company purchased certain assets related to the collectible toy and art industry. Super Rad Toys, Inc. was founded as a California corporation in December 2006. As a result of preparing to go public, it reincorporated in Nevada under the name of Super Rad Industries, Inc. doing business as Super Rad Toys. ~~Since the Super Rad’s inception it has emerged at the forefront of the collectible art world, by producing innovative and high-quality vinyl collectibles.~~ In early 2012 the Company entered into an agreement with Todd Whanish to purchase his web platform in order to get involved in the online toy business, catering to artists and the toy industry in general. ~~While~~Current ~~the~~management ~~Company~~has, ~~will~~after ~~still~~examining bethe ~~involved~~data inregarding the ~~production~~cost of ~~high-quality~~the ~~vinyl~~necessary ~~collectibles~~portal itand ~~plans~~related oncosts ~~making~~and finding that the ~~new~~anticipated ~~acquisition~~margins ofwere ~~Mr.~~less ~~Whanish’s~~than ~~web~~8%, ~~platform~~discontinued ~~its~~this ~~primary~~line ~~business~~of ~~focus~~business. ~~This~~ Previous ~~purchase~~management ~~also~~had ~~provides~~announced that the Company ~~with~~had ~~the~~entered ~~ability~~into tolicensing ~~earn~~agreements ~~additional~~with ~~revenues~~Sports inTechnology, ~~areas~~Inc. ~~ancillary~~(“Sports toTechnology”) for the ~~sale~~exclusive worldwide marketing and distribution of ~~actual~~all ~~toys,~~of ~~such~~Sports asTechnology’s ~~apparel~~existing ~~and~~intellectual ~~jewelry~~property (“IP”). ~~Additionally~~ ~~the~~Sports ~~Company~~Technology ~~has~~represented ~~decided~~that toamong ~~move~~this ~~toward~~IP awas ~~web~~an ~~based~~agreement ~~approach,~~with ~~using~~the owners of the ~~URL:~~Flowboard ~~www.urtoice.com~~design ~~. In~~and ~~furtherance~~distribution ofrights ~~this~~which ~~new~~granted ~~business~~Sports ~~focus,~~Technology ~~the~~assignable ~~Company~~and ~~has~~exclusive ~~been~~rights ~~coding~~to marketing and ~~signing~~distribution ~~artists~~of asthe itFlowboard ~~prepares~~and ~~for~~other ~~the~~products ~~launch~~and other ancillary rights of usage. ~~Additionally,~~ Notwithstanding the Company’s previous announcements, and Sports Technology’s representations, current management has ~~signed~~found ano ~~license~~evidence of an existing agreement ~~with~~between ~~Sport~~the Company and Sports Technology, ~~Inc.~~assigning such rights, anor ~~California~~has ~~corporation,~~Sports ~~under~~Technology ~~which~~been able to provide the Company ~~acquired~~with ~~the~~any ~~exclusive~~documentation ~~licensing~~that it actually possesses any rights to ~~develop,~~the ~~market~~IP ~~and~~that ~~sell~~it ~~certain~~sought ~~products~~to ~~owned~~convey byto the Company. FBC Holding has thus terminated all agreements and relationships with Sport Technology, ~~including,~~and ~~but~~advises ~~not~~its ~~limited~~shareholders ~~to,~~that ~~Flowboard,~~Management’s ~~Flow~~position ~~Saucer,~~is ~~and~~that ~~Snowskate~~the company holds no exclusive marketing agreements for the Flowboard. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Notwithstanding ~~also~~that, ~~entered~~we ~~into~~have ataken ~~consulting~~possession ~~agreement~~of ~~with~~certain ~~Sport~~inventory ~~Technology~~including ~~Inc.~~Flowboards, Snow Skates and ~~Michael~~skateboards ~~Kern,~~and ~~under~~will ~~which~~continue ~~Sport~~to ~~Technology~~market and ~~Michael~~sell ~~Kern~~these ~~will~~products ~~provide~~on ~~consulting~~a ~~services~~non-exclusive ~~related~~basis. toManagement ~~the~~is ~~development,~~currently ~~marketing~~investigating ~~and~~additional ~~sale~~lines of ~~the~~business ~~licensed~~to incorporate into FBC Holding’s current menu of products.

DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

The Company is in the development stage and has ~~not yet~~ realized ~~any~~minimal revenues from its planned operations, but we anticipate we will have revenues in our fiscal year ended July 31, 2013. Our business plan is market and distribute the ~~FBC~~remaining inventory of Flowboard, ~~to continue to develop our existing toys~~skateboards, ~~attempt to develop~~ and~~/or~~ ~~license~~Snow-Skates ~~new toy ideas,~~ and ~~sell~~investigate ~~toys~~additional ~~via~~lines ~~retailers,~~of ~~wholesale accounts and online~~business.

Based upon the Company's business plan, it is a development stage enterprise. Accordingly, the Company presents its financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that apply in establishing operating enterprises. As a development stage enterprise, the Company discloses the deficit accumulated during the development stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from inception to the current balance sheet date.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of (a) the result of operations for the three month periods ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012; (b) the financial position at ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013; and (c) cash flows for the three month periods ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012, have been made.

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Table of Contents

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its’ wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND DEPRECIATION

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets of three to seven years. Currently we do not have any capitalized property and equipment.

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company calculates net income (loss) per share as required by ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During periods when they would be anti-dilutive common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered in the computation.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The provisions of ASC 718 allow companies to either expense the estimated fair value of stock options or to continue to follow the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") but disclose the pro forma effects on net income (loss) had the fair value of the options been expensed.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

AFC Topic 820, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximates their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, restricted cash, trade accounts receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable and due to investors. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair value or they are receivable or payable on demand. The carrying value of the Company's long-term debt, notes payable and due to investors approximates fair values of similar debt instruments.

INCOME TAX

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 720, Under ASC 720 deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

At ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012 the Company had net operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry-forwards of approximately $20,000,000 and $14,000,000 which begin to expire in 2026. The Deferred tax asset of approximately $3,100,000 and $2,090,000 in ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012 has been offset by a 100% valuation allowance. ~~The change in the valuation allowance in 2012and 2011 was $1,010,000 and $1,090,000, respectively.~~

Table of Contents

NEW PRONOUNCEMENTS

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

(2) BASIS OF REPORTING

The Company's financial statements are presented on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company has experienced a significant loss from operations as a result of its investment necessary to achieve its operating plan, which is long-range in nature. ~~For~~The ~~the~~Company ~~period~~has ~~ended~~a ~~October~~history ~~31,~~of ~~2012~~losses, ~~the~~which ~~Company~~have ~~incurred~~resulted in a ~~net~~substantial ~~loss~~accumulated ofdeficit ~~$33~~during the business development stage. The Company may continue this trend,~~581~~ until such time that revenues generated are sufficient to cover the operating expenses incurred.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to attain profitable operations and secure financing. In addition, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered by entrance into established markets and the competitive environment in which the Company operates.

The Company is pursuing equity financing for its operations. Failure to secure such financing or to raise additional capital or borrow additional funds may result in the Company depleting its available funds and not being able pay its obligations.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

(3) NOTES PAYABLE

Wave Uranium Notes

On March 20, 2008, Wave Uranium Holding (the "Company") entered into a securities purchase agreement (the "Agreement") with accredited investors (the "Investors") pursuant to which the Investors purchased an aggregate principal amount of $1,562,500 of 8% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Debentures for an aggregate purchase price of $1,250,000 (the "Debentures"). The Debentures bore interest at 8% and mature twenty-four months from the date of issuance. The Debentures were convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of common stock, at an initial conversion price equal to $0.25 ("Initial Conversion Price"). These notes were converted to preferred shares with an exercise price of $0.625 prior to the reverse split.

In connection with the Agreement, each Investor received a warrant to purchase such number of shares of common stock equal to their subscription amount divided by the Initial Conversion Price ("Warrants"). Each Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $90 prior to the reverse split. The investors may exercise the Warrants on a cashless basis if the shares of common stock underlying the Warrants are not then registered pursuant to an effective registration statement. In the event the Investors exercise the Warrants on a cashless basis, then we will not receive any proceeds. The conversion price of the Debentures and the exercise price of the Warrants are subject to full ratchet and anti-dilution adjustment for subsequent lower price issuances by the Company, as well as customary adjustments provisions for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and the like.

The full principal amount of the Debentures is due upon default under the terms of Debentures. Beginning on the seven (7) month anniversary of the closing of the Debentures and continuing on the same day of each successive month thereafter, the Company must prepay 1/18th of the aggregate face amount of the Debentures, plus all accrued interest thereon, either in cash or in common stock, at the option of the Company. If the Debenture is prepaid in shares of common stock, the conversion price of such shares shall be equal to the lesser of (i) the conversion price then in effect and (ii) 80% of the average of the three (3) closing bid prices for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day that is immediately prior to the applicable redemption date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company's right to prepay the Debentures in shares of common stock on each prepayment date is subject to, among other things, the following conditions: (i) that a registration statement must be effective on such prepayment date and available for use by the Investors (ii) the shares to be issued are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and (iii) the aggregate number of shares to be issued under any monthly redemption amount is less than 20% of the total dollar trading volume of the Company's common stock for the 20 trading days prior to the applicable monthly redemption date. Beneficial conversion was calculated based on the converted value and amortized over the life of the loan.

Table of Contents

At any time after the effectiveness of the registration statement described below, the Company may, upon written notice, redeem the Debentures in cash at 115% of the then outstanding principal amount of the Debentures provided, among other things, that (i) the volume weighted average price ("VWAP") for any 20 consecutive trading days exceeds $0.50, (ii) a registration statement must be effective on such redemption date and available for use by the Investors and (iii) the Company has satisfied all conditions under the transaction documents.

Each of the Investors have contractually agreed to restrict their ability to exercise the Warrants and convert the Debentures such that the number of shares of the Company common stock held by each of them and their affiliates after such conversion or exercise does not exceed 4.99% of the Company's then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

The Company is obligated to file a registration statement registering the resale of shares of (i) the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Debentures, (ii) the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, and (iii) the shares of common stock issuable as payment of interest on the Debenture. If the registration statement is not filed within 45 days from the final closing, or declared effective within 105 days thereafter (120 days if the registration statement receives a review by the SEC), the Company is obligated to pay the investors certain fees in the amount of 2% of the total purchase price of the Debentures, per month, and the obligations may be deemed to be in default..

Additionally the Company has shown the current portion of the debt in current liabilities; also the Company has discounted the note under the interest method and is amortizing the debt discount over the life of the loan. On July 6, 2009 the debenture terms were amended with the interest rate being changed to nil (0.00%) and the conversion price changed to $.62 per share prior to the reverse split.

The Company has discounted the Debentures under the interest method, and the original issue discount on the Debentures of $312,500 plus the additional calculated debt discount of $1,250,000 derived from the calculated cost of the conversion feature and attached warrants as limited by the face amount of the Debentures ($1,562,500 total) is being amortized over the life of the loan, which has been fully amortized in prior years. The Company's potential equity cost from the conversion feature and attached warrants of $1,249,500 was recorded as an equity obligation liability in 2008. The equity obligation expires five years from amended date, July 6, 2009). As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2012 and 2011~~2013, there have been no conversions and the equity obligation is presented as a current liability in the amount of $1,249,500.

FBC Holding Notes

The Company entered into a financing agreement with a lender, which provides for incremental installments resulting in a series of convertible notes. The terms of these notes include interest payable at the rate of 8%, maturing in three (3) months from the origination date. The notes are convertible at 50% of the lowest trading price during the five (5) ~~day~~days ~~closing~~prior ~~trading~~to ~~price at~~ the date of the conversion request.

The Company evaluated the terms of the notes in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and determined that the underlying common stock is indexed to the Company’s common stock. The Company determined that the conversion features meet the definition of a liability and therefore bifurcated the conversion feature and accounted for it as a separate derivative liability. The Company evaluated the conversion feature for a beneficial conversion feature. The effective conversion price was compared to the market price on the date of the note and was deemed to be less than the market value of underlying common stock at the inception of the note. Therefore, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature, to the extent of the note, and applied as a debt discount to the Convertible Notes Payable and amortized to interest expense over the terms of the note.

The features of the notes resulted in the recognition of a derivative liability. The Company re-valued the features using the Black-Scholes Model, which resulted in a potential liability of $~~938~~888,~~165~~003 as of ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013.

Assumptions used in the original derivative valuation were as follows:

Weighted Average:
Dividend rate	0.0	%
Risk-free interest rate	.06	%
Expected lives (years)	.18
Expected price volatility	134.6	%
Forfeiture Rate	0.0	%

Table of Contents

During the year ended July 31, 2012 and through the current period, the series of agreements required the lender to perform certain additional services, including management and satisfaction of certain of the Company’s liabilities. Each series of notes included compensation for the management function, recorded as expense and added to the convertible notes face value. Additionally, the services called for compensation in shares to be issued. Under these individual agreements, the Company is obligated to issue the lender ~~117,045,353~~ shares of common stock for these financing services, which were valued at the fair market value of the stock at the date of origination (grant date), ~~resulting in $391,807 of financing costs (operating expense)~~ and a corresponding recognition of ~~the~~an equity obligation. During the six month period ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 the Company issued ~~435~~3,~~311~~480,~~268~~227 shares of common stock, valued at $~~125~~175,~~106~~268. The balance due, as of ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 is valued at $~~266~~216,~~701~~539.

The balance due under all notes payable at ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and July 31, 2012 ~~and 2011~~ was $~~655~~751,~~629~~249 and $$604,083 (net of $~~14,220~~0 of unamortized debt discounts), respectively with all notes currently due or subject to conversion..

Notes payable at ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and July 31, 2011 consist of the following:

	July 31, 2012		July 31, 2012
	January 31, 2013		July 31, 2012
Demand note payable, dated June 24, 2012, 18% interest rate, maturing June 24, 2013	$	7,500	$	7,500
Convertible notes payable, all under identical terms of 8% interest, maturing in 30 days from issuance date, convertible into common shares at 50% discount to average five day trading price at date of request		~~648~~743,~~129~~749		610,803
Debt discount assigned to convertible notes payable		-		(14,220	)
		655,629		604,083
		751,249		604,083
Current maturities of debt		~~655~~751,~~629~~249		604,083
Long-term portion of debt	$	-	$	-

The Company has discounted the Debentures under the interest method, and the original issue discount on the Debentures of $312,500 plus the additional calculated debt discount of $1,250,000 derived from the calculated cost of the conversion feature and attached warrants as limited by the face amount of the Debentures ($1,562,500 total) is being amortized over the life of the loan, which has been fully amortized in prior years. The Company's potential equity cost from the conversion feature and attached warrants of $1,249,500 was recorded as an equity obligation liability in 2008. The equity obligation expires five years from amended date, July 6, 2009). As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012, there have been no conversions and the equity obligation is presented as a current liability in the amount of $1,249,500.

(4) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

As of ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and July 31, 2012, the Company had 5,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value, with 2,500,000 shares issued and outstanding for each period presented.

~~As of June 13, 2012, the Company has authorized~~ (5~~,000,000,000~~) ~~shares~~NON-EMPLOYEE ofSTOCK ~~common~~OPTIONS ~~stock.~~AND WARRANTS

(5) STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

At October 31, 2012, and 2011 the Company had stock options and warrants outstanding as described below.

(6) NON-EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

The Company accounts for non-employee stock options and warrants under ASC718, whereby option and warrant costs are recorded based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Unless otherwise provided for, the Company covers option and warrant exercises by issuing new shares.

During fiscal year 2008 the Company granted 20,833 common stock warrants in connection with debenture borrowings as more fully described in Note 3. In addition the Company issued 1,828 warrants to various individuals and entities for compensation, allowing the holder to purchase one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable immediately at $150 per share with the warrant terms expiring in November and December of 2009. The fair value of these warrant grants were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 3.2%, dividend yield of 0%, expected life of 2 years, volatility of 26%. The Company recorded total compensation expense under these warrant issuances of $861,694 in fiscal year 2008. As of January 31, 2013, all of the 2008 warrant grants of 22,661 expired.

The Company issued 100,000 warrants in 2009 under a $150,000 convertible debenture, allowing the holder to purchase one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable immediately at $1 per share with the warrant terms expiring in July 2014. The warrants were out of the money with no material recording value. At January 31, 2012 these warrants were not exercised and remain outstanding.

Table of Contents

~~During~~(6) fiscal year 2008 the Company granted 20,833 common stock warrants in connection with debenture borrowings as more fully described in Note 3. In addition the Company issued 1,828 warrants to various individuals and entities for compensation, allowing the holder to purchase one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable immediately at $150 per share with the warrant terms expiring in November and December of 2009. The fair value of these warrant grants were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 3.2%, dividend yield of 0%, expected life of 2 years, volatility of 26%. The Company recorded total compensation expense under these warrant issuances of $861,694 in fiscal year 2008. As of October 31, 2012, all of the 2008 warrant grants of 22,661 expired.CONTINGENCIES

The Company issued 100,000 warrants in 2009 under a $150,000 convertible debenture, allowing the holder to purchase one share of common stock per warrant, exercisable immediately at $1 per share with the warrant terms expiring in July 2014. The warrants were out of the money with no material recording value. At October 31, 2012 these warrants were not exercised and remain outstanding.

(7) CONTINGENCIES

In November 2008 a note holder filed a legal action against the Company in the Superior Court of Orange County, California alleging breach of contract and other malfeasance and seeking damages of approximately $225,000. The Company disputed the allegations, however on August 8, 2012; the Company has reached a settlement agreement in the amount of $40,000. Under an arrangement, payments in the amount of $7,000 have been paid.

(87) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has consulting contracts with its two officers and directors. ~~The~~In November 2012 the Company ~~does~~and ~~not~~the ~~have~~officers/directors aexecuted ~~funding~~an ~~commitment~~agreement orfor ~~any~~the ~~written~~services ~~agreement~~of these directors for ~~our~~$5,000 ~~future~~per ~~required~~month, ~~cash~~which ~~needs~~amount ~~with~~would ~~these~~be ~~officers~~adjusted orby ~~any~~an ~~beneficial~~agreement ~~owners~~between the parties based upon the relative levels of effort during the ~~Company~~period.

The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in additional business opportunities that become available. A conflict may arise in selecting between the Company and other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

The Company does not own or lease property or lease office space. The Company has minimal needs for office space at this time. Office space, as needed has been provided by the officers and directors of the Company at no charge.

The amounts and terms of the above transactions may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent third parties.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FBC Holding, Inc. for the period ended ~~October~~ January 31, ~~2012~~2013 contains forward-looking statements, principally in this Section and “Business.” Generally, you can identify these statements because they use words like “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” and similar terms. These statements reflect only our current expectations. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy and actual results may differ materially from those we anticipated due to a number of uncertainties, many of which are unforeseen, including, among others, the risks we face as described in this filing. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which apply only as of the date of this annual report. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. To the extent that such statements are not recitations of historical fact, such statements constitute forward-looking statements that, by definition, involve risks and uncertainties. In any forward-looking statement where we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement of expectation of belief will be accomplished.

We believe it is important to communicate our expectations to our investors. There may be events in the future; however, that we are unable to predict accurately or over which we have no control. The risk factors listed in this filing, as well as any cautionary language in this annual report, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated, include, but are not limited to: our ability to successfully maintain a credit facility to purchase new and used machines, manufacture new products; the ability to obtain financing for product acquisition; changes in product strategies; general economic, financial and business conditions; changes in and compliance with governmental regulations; changes in various tax laws; and the availability of key management and other personnel.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts, giving due consideration to materiality. We believe that of our significant accounting policies (more fully described in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), the following are particularly important to the portrayal of our results of operations and financial position and may require the application of a higher level of judgment by our management, and as a result are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.

DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

We are in the development stage and have not yet realized any revenues from our planned operations, but we anticipate we will have revenues in our fiscal year ended July 31, 2013, beginning with our quarter ended ~~January~~April 3130, 2013. Our business plan is to continue to ~~develop~~sell our existing ~~toys,~~inventory asof ~~well~~Flowboards, asskateboards ~~attempt~~and toSnow ~~develop~~Skates, and~~/or~~ ~~license~~to ~~new~~investigate ~~toy~~additional ~~ideas,~~lines ~~and~~of ~~sell~~business ~~toys~~which ~~via~~to ~~retailers,~~incorporate ~~wholesale~~into ~~accounts~~the ~~and~~holding ~~online~~company.

Based upon our business plan, we are a development stage enterprise. Accordingly, we present our financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that apply in establishing operating enterprises. As a development stage enterprise, we disclose the deficit accumulated during the development stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from inception to the current balance sheet date.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

We account for stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The provisions of ASC 718 allow companies to either expense the estimated fair value of stock options or to continue to follow the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") but disclose the pro forma effects on net income (loss) had the fair value of the options been expensed.

Table of Contents

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

We calculate net income (loss) per share as required by ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During periods when they would be anti-dilutive common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered in the computation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended ~~October~~Janaury 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012

Introduction

For the three and six months ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013, we did not generate any revenue ~~in the current quarter~~. As a result our selling, general and administrative expenses do not contain any costs of sales. With our lack of revenues and our expenses for the three and six months ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013, we had a net loss of $3373,~~581~~640 and $146,568, respectively. For the three and six months ~~October~~January 31, ~~2011~~2012, we had nominimal revenue and nominimal cost of sales. We had a net loss of 61$$107,~~061~~244 and $168,305 for three and six months ~~October~~ended January 31, ~~2011~~2012, respectively. An explanation of these numbers and how they relate to our business is contained below.

Revenues

Revenues for the three and six months ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011were~~2012were $0 and $140,~~500,~~ respectively. ~~Prior year revenues were generated from trade show sales.~~ We did not have any revenue in the current year, as we were focusing on securing the marketing rights and distribution channels; engaging new directors and management; and addressing numerous unresolved issues identified subsequent to our change in management. We expect to have revenue in future quarters, but the amount will be dependent on a variety of factors and there is no guarantee we will be successful. For the three and six months ended January 31, 2012 we had revenues of $19,000 and $33,500, respectively, derived from trade shows.

On January 4, 2013 the Company closed a transaction with Sport Technology and Fulfillment Express, Inc. (“FEX”) in which we were assigned ownership of certain inventory consisting of skateboards, Flowboards and Snow Skates valued at $7,155. The Company paid $500 in cash at closing and agreed to assume the existing obligations of Sport Technology to FEX at a 50% discount, or $1,757.63 (the “FEX Obligation”). We agreed to pay the FEX Obligation from the proceeds of the sale of the Inventory which we expect to occur in Q3 of 2013. We also agreed to assume Sports Technology’s prospective obligations under their then-existing contract for fulfillment services with FEX anticipated to be approximately $250 per month until cancelled.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Our selling, general and administrative expenses ~~are~~for ~~those expenses we have related to~~ the ~~actual~~three ~~sales of our products~~ and ~~the~~six ~~costs we incur in transporting those products. For the three~~ months ~~October~~ended January 31, ~~2012~~2013 ~~our selling~~ and ~~distribution~~2012 ~~expenses~~ were $3960,~~990~~558, ~~compared to~~ $68123,~~405 for the three months October 31~~244, ~~2011. Our selling~~$155,755 ~~general~~ and ~~administrative expenses for the three months October 31~~$161,727, ~~2012 were less than the same period one year ago due to our decrease in operations~~respectively. Our selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of professional expenses (legal, accounting and auditing), management consulting and other costs incurred related to the public reporting and attainment of working capital to commence our business operations.

Non-Cash Compensation

Our non-cash compensation for the ~~three~~six months ~~October~~ending January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011was~~2012 was $0 and $17,221, respectively. This significant decrease in our non-cash compensation was primarily due to the fact that in the three-month period ended October 31, 2011, we paid several consultants and services providers for their services with shares of our common stock. This is a practice we are trying to cease and instead we are trying to borrow the funds we need to continue our business until we generate revenues from our operations sufficient to pay for such services, which may not ever occur.

Net Income (Loss)

Our net loss for the six months ended January 31, 2013 was $96,406 compared to $168,305. Our net loss was less this year due to non-cash stock compensation, in the amount of $17,221 during 2012.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

For the three months October 31, 2012 and 2011, our interest expense was $24,552 and $7,156, respectively. Our interest expense for both periods relates to our notes payable.

Net Income (Loss)

Our net loss for the three months ended October 31, 2012 was $33,581 compared to $61,061. Our net loss was less this year due to non-cash stock compensation, in the amount of $17,221 during 2011. As noted above, we do not plan to resume paying consultants through the issuance of our securities in the near future, but instead to raise money through the sale of our securities or debt in order to pay consultants and other necessary personnel.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity consist of cash and cash equivalents and borrowing from various sources. At ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013, our cash totaled $101,360 and we had negative working capital of $3,~~877~~949,~~343~~988.

Our existing sources of liquidity, along with cash expected to be generated from sales, will likely not be sufficient to fund our operations, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and other financing requirements for the foreseeable future. If that is the case we may need to seek to obtain additional debt or equity financing, especially if setbacks to our operating plans, fail to liquidate our current inventory of Flowboards, skateboards and Snow Skates, and experience delays, fail to identify or fail to consummate a definitive purchase/sales transaction with a viable existing business or promising early-stage company, or; if we do identify and close a transaction with a promising business and we experience downturns or cyclical fluctuations in ~~our~~that business that are more severe or longer than anticipated, or if we fail to achieve anticipated revenue targets, or if we experience significant increases in the cost of providing services or of raw material and manufacturing, or lose a significant customer, or experience increases in our expense levels resulting from being a publicly-traded company. If we attempt to obtain additional debt or equity financing, we cannot assure you that such financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all.

As a result our audited financial statements for the year ended ~~October~~July 31, 2012 contain an explanatory note (footnote 2) to the effect that our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to retain our current short term financing and ultimately to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis in order to attain profitability, as well successfully obtain financing on favorable terms to fund the company’s long term plans. We can give no assurance that our plans and efforts to achieve the above steps will be successful.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the three months ended ~~October~~January 31:

	2012			2011
Provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	(4097,~~193~~137	)	$	(57104,~~262~~206	)
Investing activities		-			-
Financing activities		3795,~~326~~620			5296,500
Net Cash Used in Continuing Operations	$	(21,~~867~~517	)	$	(47,~~762~~706	)

Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended ~~October~~January 31, 2012 and ~~2011~~2012

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was ($4097,~~193~~137) and (57104,~~262~~206) for the ~~three~~six months ending ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012, respectively. Cash was used primarily to meet the administrative requirements.

Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $-0- for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $3795,~~326~~620 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013, compared to $5296,500 for the comparable ~~three~~six months ended ~~October~~January 31, ~~2011~~2012. The cash provided by financing activities ~~for the nine months October 31, 2012,~~ consisted of convertible debt borrowings.

ITEM 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Table of Contents

ITEM 4 Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ~~and Chief Financial Officer~~, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as of October 31, 2012, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission's rules and forms, including to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer ~~and~~has ~~Chief Financial Officer have~~ concluded that as of ~~October~~January 31, ~~2012~~2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses identified and described in Item 9A(b).

(b) Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and ~~principal financial officer and~~ effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that:

•	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and any disposition of our assets;
•	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
•	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Table of Contents

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, Management has identified the following two material weaknesses that have caused management to conclude that, as of October 31, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures, and our internal control over financial reporting, were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We have not documented our internal controls. We have limited policies and procedures that cover the recording and reporting of financial transactions and accounting provisions. As a result we were delayed in our ability to calculate certain accounting provisions. While we believe these provisions are accounted for correctly in the attached audited financial statements our lack of internal controls led to a delay in the filing of this Annual Report. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

Table of Contents

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Accordingly, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

To remediate the material weakness in our documentation, evaluation and testing of internal controls we ~~may~~have ~~engage~~engaged a third-party firm to assist us in remedying this material weakness.

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In October, 2012 the board of directors engaged an independent accountant to perform all bookkeeping functions for the company. The books were previously maintained by the CEO who was terminated by the ~~board~~Board on September 24, 2012. The independent accountant will have the ability to make payments on behalf of the company at the direction of the board of directors.

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 Legal Proceedings

On July 10, 2007 the Company’s predecessor Wave Uranium Holding, Inc. sold a Secured Promissory Note to Panthera Advisers, LLC (“Lender”) in the amount of $51,000 (the “Note”) which was provided to the Company by the Lender on July 26, 2007.. The note carried 12% interest and matured on September 30, 2007. On October 10, 2007 the Company borrowed another $100,000 under the Note and in addition to the terms of the note agreed to provide the Lender 51,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On April 20, 2009 the Note was assigned to California Asset Recovery Solutions, LLC (“Assigned Lender”) .The Company failed to repay the Note or provide the stock and the Assigned Lender filed a complaint with the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “Court”) on or about November 13, 2008. The company failed to address the complaint and on May 27, 2009 the Court determined in favor of the Plaintiffs and issued a judgment in the amount of $238,152 (the “Judgment”). The Company failed to comply with the Judgment and on April 22, 2012 the Assigned Lender filed a Motion to Appoint a Receiver which was approved by the Court on August 1, 2012. The Court held the appointment until August 8, 2012 to allow the parties to resolve the matter. On August 8, 2012 the Company, the Assigned Lender and the Company’s Senior Secured Creditor entered into Release and Settlement Agreement (“Release”) in which the Senior Secured Creditor agreed to a de facto purchase the Judgment from the Assigned Lender According to the Release the Assigned Lender will file a Release of Judgment upon the occurrence of certain performance by the Secured Lender and the Company. In the event that the conditions are not fulfilled the Company may be put into immediate receivership. The Company has fulfilled its obligations under the Release and is unaware of the status of the other parties.

In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and it is possible that the resolution of such matters might have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition and/or results of operations. However, in the opinion of our management, other than as set forth herein, matters currently pending or threatened against us are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A Risk Factors

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide ~~the~~a statement of risk factors. However, we believe this information ~~required~~may bybe valuable to our shareholders for this ~~Item~~filing. We reserve the right to not provide risk factors in our future filings. Our primary risk factors and other considerations include:

~~ITEM~~Cost ~~2 Unregistered~~and ~~Sales~~availability of ~~Equity~~product ~~Securities~~liability ~~and Use of Proceeds~~insurance

InOur ~~April,~~products ~~2011,~~are wedesigned ~~issued~~for ~~150,000~~and ~~shares~~used toby ~~Seafin~~extreme ~~Capital,~~sports ~~LLC~~enthusiasts of varying degrees of competence. Extreme sports, inby ~~exchange~~their ~~for~~nature anrun ~~equity~~the ~~investment~~inherent risk of ~~$12,000~~serious physical injury to those who utilize our products even when operated properly. ~~The~~ ~~shares~~Our ~~were~~products ~~restricted~~may also be used in ~~accordance~~an ~~with~~unsafe ~~Rule~~manner, ~~144. The~~by ~~issuance~~inexperienced ~~was~~users ~~exempt~~or ~~from~~material ~~registration~~defects ~~pursuant~~resulting in personal injury which may be actionable. We intend to ~~Section~~secure ~~4(2)~~the protection of ~~the~~product ~~Securities~~liability ~~Act~~insurance ofbut ~~1933,~~cannot ~~and~~be ~~Seafin~~assured ~~Capital,~~that ~~LLC,~~such isinsurance will be available or available at a ~~sophisticated~~cost ~~investor~~which ~~and~~is ~~familiar~~not ~~with~~unreasonable. ~~our~~In ~~operations~~the absence of such insurance we may decide that certain lines of business may not be economically feasible.

OnSettlement ~~May 11, 2011, we issued 166,666 shares to Seafin Capital, LLC, in exchange for an equity investment~~ of ~~$25,000. The~~outstanding shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Seafin Capital, LLC, is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.litigation

OnThe ~~May~~Company ~~20,~~has ~~2011,~~an weoutstanding ~~issued~~judgment ~~2,000,000~~against ~~shares~~it toin ~~Panther~~the ~~Consulting~~amount ~~Corp.~~of $238,152. inAs ~~exchange~~of ~~for~~March ~~debt~~6, ~~conversion~~2012 the amount of ~~$2,000,~~this ~~valued~~judgment atwith ~~$0.001~~additional ~~per~~interest ~~share~~and legal fees grew to $309,070. 53. The ~~shares~~Creditor ~~were~~filed ~~restricted~~a inMotion ~~accordance~~to ~~with~~Appoint ~~Rule~~a ~~144~~Receiver and on August1, 2012, the Court granted the motion. The ~~issuance~~judgment was ~~exempt~~purchased from ~~registration~~the Creditor by our Principal Creditor pursuant to ~~Section~~a ~~4(2)~~Release ofand ~~the~~Settlement ~~Securities~~agreement ~~Act~~dated ofAugust ~~1933~~8, ~~and~~2012. ~~Island~~It is apossible ~~sophisticated~~that ~~investor~~the Principal Creditor will default on its obligations under Release and ~~familiar~~Settlement ~~with~~Agreement ~~our~~and ~~operations~~the Creditor may choose to enforce the Motion to Appoint a Receiver or the Principal Creditor may opt to enforce the Motion. (See Recent Events)

On May 21, 2011, we issued 4,000,000 shares to MGMT4 Personal Services, in exchange for consulting services and were valued at approximately $0.015 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Island is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On February 13, 2012, we issued 7,485,000 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $26,198. The value placed on these shares was $0.0035 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

Table of Contents

OnDeparture ~~February 14, 2012, we issued 7,352,941 shares~~ of ~~our~~previous ~~common~~management ~~stock~~has tocreated ~~Condor~~circumstances ~~Financial~~in ~~Management~~which SAwe indo ~~exchange~~not ~~for~~have ~~reduction~~possession of ~~debt~~documents ofsuch ~~$36,765. The~~as ~~value~~agreements ~~placed~~and oncontracts ~~these~~which ~~shares~~may ~~was~~result ~~$0.005 per share. The shares were restricted~~ in ~~accordance~~latent ~~with~~litigation ~~Rule~~or ~~144. The~~the ~~issuance~~existence ~~was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2)~~ of ~~the~~corporate ~~Securities~~obligations ~~Act~~ of ~~1933,~~which ~~and~~we ~~Condor~~are ~~Financial~~not ~~Management SA is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations~~aware.

OnPrevious ~~April~~management ~~17,~~consisted ~~2012,~~of wea ~~issued~~single ~~10,100,000~~officer ~~shares~~and ofdirector ~~our~~who ~~common~~maintained ~~stock~~all tobooks ~~Condor~~and ~~Financial~~records ~~Management~~of SAthe incompany ~~exchange~~and ~~for~~was ~~reduction~~authorized ofto ~~debt~~incur obligations on behalf of ~~$13,130~~the company. The ~~value~~current ~~placed~~board onof ~~these~~directors ~~shares~~and ~~was~~officers ~~$0.0013~~have ~~per~~requested ~~share. The~~that ~~shares~~all ~~were~~corporate ~~restricted~~books, inrecords, ~~accordance~~material ~~with~~contracts ~~Rule~~and ~~144. The~~agreements ~~issuance~~be ~~was~~supplied ~~exempt~~to ~~from~~the ~~registration~~directors. ~~pursuant~~However, tothis ~~Section~~has ~~4(2)~~not ofoccurred ~~the~~and ~~Securities~~previous ~~Act~~management ofhas ~~1933,~~been uncooperative and ~~Condor~~tacitly ~~Financial~~refused ~~Management~~to SAproduce issame. aIf ~~sophisticated~~we ~~investor~~are ~~and~~not ~~familiar~~able ~~with~~to ~~our~~secure ~~operations.~~the cooperation of previous management,

Ono ~~February~~We ~~13,~~may ~~2012,~~be weunaware ~~issued 10,600,000 shares~~ of our ~~common~~obligations ~~stock~~under ~~to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $37,100. The value placed on~~ these ~~shares~~contracts ~~was~~or ~~$0.0035 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933~~agreements, and ~~Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.~~;

Ono ~~April~~We ~~26,~~may ~~2012,~~be weunable ~~issued 8,333,333 shares~~ to ~~Crystal~~provide ~~Falls~~regulators ~~Investments, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt sold of $33,333. The value placed on these shares was $0.004 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance~~ with ~~Rule~~documentation ~~144. The~~which ~~issuance~~has ~~was~~not ~~exempt~~been ~~from~~returned ~~registration pursuant~~ to ~~Section 4(2) of~~ the ~~Securities Act of 1933~~company, and ~~Crystal Falls Investments, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.~~;

Ono ~~June~~We ~~29,~~may ~~2012~~be ~~the~~subject ~~Company issued 33,000,000 shares of common stock~~ to ~~two~~litigation ~~consultants~~ in ~~exchange~~regard ~~for~~to ~~services. The~~nonfulfillment ~~shares~~of ~~were~~our ~~valued~~obligations atunder ~~their~~these ~~fair market value~~agreements, ~~$17,600, at the date of the grant.~~and;

Ono ~~August~~We ~~14,~~may ~~2012,~~not wehave ~~issued~~complete ~~15,555,556~~documentation ~~shares~~with ofregard ~~our common stock~~ to ~~Magna~~corporate ~~Group,~~governance ~~LLC.~~issues insuch ~~exchange~~as ~~for~~board ~~reduction~~books, ~~of debt of $5~~minutes,~~444. The~~ value placed on these shares was $0.0007 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933resolutions, ~~and Condor Financial Management SA is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations~~etc.

OnAs ~~August~~a 20result, ~~2012,~~latent weliabilities ~~issued~~may ~~16,000,000~~exists ~~shares~~that ofmay ~~our~~negatively ~~common~~impact ~~stock~~us toeconomically ~~Capitoline~~or ~~Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $3,200~~operationally. The value placed on these shares was $0.0004 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

OnWe ~~September~~have ~~11,~~accumulated ~~2012,~~considerable ~~we issued 40,000,000 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of~~ debt ofwhich ~~$20,000. The~~has value placed on these shares was $0.001 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a ~~sophisticated~~conversion ~~investor and familiar with our operations.~~feature

OnThe ~~September~~company ~~17,~~currently ~~2012,~~has weapproximately ~~issued 77~~$710,~~860,870~~000 ~~shares~~in ofconvertible ~~our~~debt, ~~common~~plus ~~stock to Capitoline Ventures II~~interest, ~~LLC in exchange for reduction~~ of ~~debt~~which, ofwe ~~$19~~anticipate,~~465. The~~ ~~value~~all ~~placed~~or ona ~~these~~portion ~~shares~~will ~~was~~be ~~$0.0005~~converted ~~per~~into ~~share. The~~common shares ~~were~~at ~~restricted~~a indiscount ~~accordance~~to ~~with Rule 144~~market. ~~The~~ ~~issuance~~This ~~was~~may ~~exempt~~result ~~from~~in ~~registration~~material ~~pursuant~~dilution ~~to Section 4(2)~~ of the ~~Securities~~present ~~Act~~shareholders ~~of 1933,~~ and ~~Capitoline~~may ~~Ventures~~negatively ~~II,~~impact ~~LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with~~ our ~~operations~~stock price.

OnThe ~~October~~Company 2,has ~~2012,~~and weis ~~issued~~expected ~~55,228,659 shares of our common stock~~ to ~~Capitoline~~continue Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $19,330. The value placed on these shares was $0.0007 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to ~~Section~~use ~~4(2) of~~ the ~~Securities~~services ~~Act~~ of ~~1933,~~third ~~and~~party ~~Capitoline~~unaffiliated ~~Ventures~~market ~~II,~~awareness ~~LLC~~service ~~is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations~~providers.

OnThe ~~October~~Company 11is advising investors that non-affiliate shareholders of the company, ~~2012~~and the Company may, wefrom ~~issued~~time ~~230~~to time,~~666,183~~ ~~shares~~engage ofthe ~~our~~services ~~common~~of ~~stock~~unaffiliated firms to ~~Capitoline~~provide ~~Ventures~~investor IIrelations and advertising services. These third party shareholders may own the Company’s shares and plan to liquidate, ~~LLC~~which may negatively affect the stock price. All content in ~~exchange~~our releases is for ~~reduction~~informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of ~~debt~~an offer to buy or sell securities. Neither the information presented nor any statement or expression of ~~$57~~opinion,~~667. The~~ ~~value~~or ~~placed~~any onother ~~these~~matter ~~shares~~herein, ~~was~~directly ~~$0.0005~~or ~~per~~indirectly ~~share. The~~constitutes ~~shares~~a ~~were~~solicitation ~~restricted~~of inthe ~~accordance~~purchase ~~with~~or ~~Rule~~sale ~~144~~of any securities. The ~~issuance~~Company ~~was~~does ~~exempt~~not ~~from~~purport ~~registration~~to ~~pursuant~~provide an analysis of any company's financial position, operations or prospects and this is not to ~~Section~~be ~~4(2)~~construed ofas a recommendation by the ~~Securities~~Company ~~Act~~or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. Neither the Company nor any of ~~1933~~its members, ~~and~~officers, ~~Capitoline~~directors, ~~Ventures~~debt-holders, IIcontractors or employees are licensed broker-dealers, ~~LLC~~account isrepresentatives, amarket ~~sophisticated~~makers, ~~investor~~investment ~~and~~bankers, ~~familiar~~registered investment advisors, analyst or underwriters. Readers should always consult with a licensed securities professional before purchasing or selling any securities of any company including our ~~operations~~own. It is possible that a reader's entire investment may be lost or impaired due to the speculative nature of the investment.

We have a history of losses which could continue in the future.

We have reported losses for every year since our inception and have an accumulated deficit of $20.3 million as of April 31, 2012. There can be no assurance that we will report positive net income in any future period

The commercial acceptance and economic viability of our products are uncertain

Our primary product, the FBC Flowboard was well-received during its initial launch in 2008 achieving revenue which has been represented to us as $400,000 in its first year and $2,000,000 in its second year. It has also been represented to us that Sports Technology, Inc., the company which did the introduction had to discontinue operations due to its inability to secure adequate funding to meet the rising demand for the product. The reintroduction of the product may not be met with the same level of acceptance and the product may not be successful.

Table of Contents

If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain talent, our operating results could suffer.

We depend on the continued service of our senior management. The loss of the services of any key employee could hurt our business. Also, our future success depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train and motivate other highly skilled personnel. Failure to do so may adversely affect future results.

We have a definitive Judgment against Us and a Court approved Motion to Appoint a Receiver

The Company has a judgment against it in the amount of $238,152 the Holder of the judgment has requested and obtained a Motion to Appoint a Receiver. The Motion has not been enforced as a result of a tripartite Release and Settlement Agreement among the holder of the judgment, the Company and the Company’s Senior Secured Lender. In the event all or some parties fail to fulfill their obligations under the Release and Settlement Agreement the holder of the judgment may appoint a Receiver. This event would have a negative impact on the Company’s abilities to complete its business plans and management would expect that to have a negative effect on the price of the stock.

We have very little operating capital, and we likely must raise additional capital to remain in business.

We presently have very little operating capital and are dependent upon future fundraising efforts to provide the minimum capital necessary to continue our business. Such fundraising efforts may include the sale of additional shares of the Company or could involve commercial or institutional borrowing. Although we believe that our status as a publicly-traded company will enhance our ability to raise additional capital, our financial condition is dire and we are currently operating with no or very little working capital and several loan obligations. We cannot assure you that capital will be available to meet the costs of our operations, or that it will be available on acceptable terms. Even if we raise the maximum amount of fundraising, we will still need to raise additional capital to operate our Company. Presently, we have no commitments or arrangements from commercial lenders or other sources.

Our operating costs will most likely increase.

Our income could be seriously affected by rising operating expenses. If we cannot control operating costs or adequately cover them, our cash flow will deteriorate and we will have to raise capital or discontinue our business.

If we are unable to maintain relationships with our suppliers, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Substantially all of our products are manufactured by third parties. To the extent that a manufacturer is unwilling to do business with us, or to continue to do business with us once we enter into formal agreements with it, our business could be materially adversely affected. In addition, to the extent that the manufacturer modifies the terms of any contract it may enter into with us (including, without limitation, the terms regarding price, rights of return, or other terms that are favorable to us), or extend lead times, limit supplies due to capacity constraints, or other factors, there could be a material adverse effect on our business.

We operate in a competitive industry and continue to be under the pressure of eroding gross profit margins, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The market for the products we sell is very competitive and subject to rapid changes in terms of market popularity. The prices for our intended products tend to decrease over their life cycle, which can result in decreased gross profit margins for us. There is also substantial and continuing pressure from customers to reduce their total cost for products. We expend substantial amounts on the value creation services required to remain competitive, retain existing business, and gain new customers, and we must evaluate the expense of those efforts against the impact of price and margin reductions. Further, our margins will be lower in certain geographic markets and certain parts of our business than in others. If we are unable to effectively compete in our industry or are unable to maintain acceptable gross profit margins, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Products sold by us may be found to be defective and, as a result, product liability claims may be asserted against us, which may have a material adverse effect on the company.

We may face claims for damages as a result of defects or failures in the products we intend to sell to our customers. Because we Although many of our products are sold under a third-party warranty or are sold “as is” our ability to avoid liabilities, including consequential damages, may be limited as a result of differing factors, such as the inability to exclude such damages due to the laws of some of the locations where we do business. Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of a significant quality or performance issue in the products developed by us, if we are required to pay for the damages that result.

Table of Contents

If we add additional products, we may not be able to successfully integrate them or attain the anticipated benefits.

We may acquire licenses for additional products that are synergistic with ours. If we are unsuccessful in integrating these products, or if integration is more costly than anticipated, we may experience disruptions that could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from our licenses, which could result in an impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discover material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or timely or detect fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

An effective internal control environment is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and is an important part of our effort to prevent financial fraud. We will be required to periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls over financial reporting. Based on these evaluations, we may conclude that enhancements, modifications or changes to internal controls are necessary or desirable. While management will evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls on a regular basis, and although we have recently undergone substantial changes to address any weaknesses, these controls may not always be effective. There are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls, including collusion, management override, and failure of human judgment. In addition, control procedures are designed to reduce rather than eliminate business risks. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, or if management or our independent registered public accounting firm discovers material weaknesses in our internal controls, we may be unable to produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC. Any such actions could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline or limit our access to capital.

We rely on manufacturers to make our products, and we have limited control over these suppliers and manufacturers and may not be able to obtain quality products on a timely basis or in sufficient quantity.

All of our products are manufactured by third-party manufacturers. We do not have any long-term contracts with these suppliers or manufacturing sources. We expect we will have to compete with our competitors for production capacity and availability at these third-party manufacturers.

There can be no assurance that there will not be a significant disruption with our manufacturers or, in the event of a disruption, that we would be able to locate alternative manufacturers with comparable quality at an acceptable price, or at all. In addition, we cannot be certain that our unaffiliated manufacturers will be able to fill our product order in a timely manner. If we experience significant increased demand, or need to replace an existing manufacturer, there can be no assurance that additional manufacturing capacity will be available when required on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, or that any supplier or manufacturer would allocate sufficient capacity to us in order to meet our requirements. In addition, even if we are able to expand existing or find new manufacturing sources, we may encounter delays in production and added costs as a result of the time it takes to train our suppliers and manufacturers in our methods, products and quality control standards. Any delays, interruption or increased costs in the manufacture of our products could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet retail customer and consumer demand for our products and result in lower revenues and net income both in the short and long-term.

ITEM 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In April, 2011, we issued 300 shares to Seafin Capital, LLC, in exchange for an equity investment of $12,000. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Seafin Capital, LLC, is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On May 11, 2011, we issued 333 shares to Seafin Capital, LLC, in exchange for an equity investment of $25,000. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Seafin Capital, LLC, is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On May 20, 2011, we issued 4,000 shares to Panther Consulting Corp., in exchange for debt conversion of $2,000, valued at $0.001 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Island is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

Table of Contents

On May 21, 2011, we issued 8,000 shares to MGMT4 Personal Services, in exchange for consulting services and were valued at approximately $0.015 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Island is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On February 13, 2012, we issued 14,970 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $26,198. The value placed on these shares was $0.0035 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On February 14, 2012, we issued 14,705 shares of our common stock to Condor Financial Management SA in exchange for reduction of debt of $36,765. The value placed on these shares was $0.005 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Condor Financial Management SA is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On April 17, 2012, we issued 20,200 shares of our common stock to Condor Financial Management SA in exchange for reduction of debt of $13,130. The value placed on these shares was $0.0013 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Condor Financial Management SA is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On February 13, 2012, we issued 21,200 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $37,100. The value placed on these shares was $0.0035 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On April 26, 2012, we issued 166,667 shares to Crystal Falls Investments, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt sold of $33,333. The value placed on these shares was $0.004 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Crystal Falls Investments, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On June 29, 2012 the Company issued 66,000 shares of common stock to two consultants in exchange for services. The shares were valued at their fair market value, $17,600, at the date of the grant.

On August 14, 2012, we issued 31,111 shares of our common stock to Magna Group, LLC. in exchange for reduction of debt of $5,444. The value placed on these shares was $0.0007 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Condor Financial Management SA is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On August 20, 2012, we issued 32,000 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $3,200. The value placed on these shares was $0.0004 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On September 11, 2012, we issued 80,000 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $20,000. The value placed on these shares was $0.001 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On September 17, 2012, we issued 155,721 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $19,465. The value placed on these shares was $0.0005 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

On October 2, 2012, we issued 110,457 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $19,330. The value placed on these shares was $0.0007 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

Table of Contents

On October 11, 2012, we issued 461,332 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $57,667. The value placed on these shares was $0.0005 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

For the period December 2012 through January 2013 we issued 2,609,605 shares of our common stock to Capitoline Ventures II, LLC in exchange for reduction of debt of $50,162 of convertible debt. The value placed on these shares was $0.0005 per share. The shares were restricted in accordance with Rule 144. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Capitoline Ventures II, LLC is a sophisticated investor and familiar with our operations.

ITEM 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities

The Company has an outstanding judgment against it in the amount of $238,152. As of March 618, ~~2012~~2013 the amount of this judgment with additional interest and legal fees grew to $309,070.53. The Creditor filed a Motion to Appoint a Receiver and on August1, 2012, the Court granted the motion. The judgment was purchased from the Creditor by our Principal Creditor pursuant to a Release and Settlement agreement dated August 8, 2012. It is possible that the Principal Creditor will default on its obligations under Release and Settlement Agreement and the Creditor may choose to enforce the Motion to Appoint a Receiver or the Principal Creditor may opt to enforce the Motion.

The company is currently in default on several of its senior secured notes..

ITEM 4 Mine Safety Disclosure

There have been no events which are required to be reported under this Item.

ITEM 5 Other Information

On ~~April~~January 610, ~~2012~~2013, wePeter ~~entered into a license agreement with Sport Technology~~Messineo, ~~Inc.,~~CPA adeclined ~~California~~to ~~corporation,~~sit ~~under~~for ~~which~~re-appointment weas ~~acquired~~ the ~~exclusive~~Company’s ~~licensing~~independent ~~rights~~registered toaudit ~~develop,~~firm ~~market~~due ~~and~~to ~~sell~~changes ~~certain~~in ~~products~~his ~~owned~~firm. On byDecember ~~Sport Technology~~17, ~~including~~2012, ~~but~~Peter ~~not~~Messineo ~~limited~~joined ~~to,~~the ~~Flowboard,~~firm ~~Flow~~now ~~Saucer,~~known ~~and~~as ~~Snowskate. The~~DKM ~~agreement~~Certified ~~grants~~Public ~~us the exclusive, worldwide rights for five years~~Accountants.

WeThe ~~also~~reports ~~entered~~of ~~into~~Peter aMessineo, ~~consulting~~CPA ~~agreement~~as ~~with~~of ~~Sport~~and ~~Technology~~for ~~Inc.~~the ~~and~~fiscal ~~Michael~~years ~~Kern~~ended July 31, ~~under~~2012 ~~which~~and ~~Sport~~2011 ~~Technology~~contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and ~~Michael~~were ~~Kern~~not ~~will~~qualified or ~~provide~~modified ~~consulting~~as ~~services~~to uncertainty, audit ~~related~~scope or accounting principle except to indicate that there was substantial doubt about the ~~development,~~Company ~~marketing~~ability ~~and~~to ~~sale~~continue ofas ~~the~~a ~~licensed~~going ~~products~~concern.

20During the fiscal years ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, and through each subsequent period, there have been no disagreements with Peter Messineo, CPA on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of Peter Messineo, CPA would have caused them to make reference thereto in connection with their report on the financial statements for such years.

On January 10, 2013, The Company engaged DKM Certified Public Accountants as their independent registered accounting firm.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6 Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Wave Uranium and the Registrant.(2)
2.2		Agreement of Sale between the Registrant and Alexandre Routkovski (2)
3.1		Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2		Bylaws (1)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing name to Wave Uranium Holding (2)
3.4		Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation increasing authorized stock (4)
10.1		Software Development and Consulting Agreement (1)
10.2		Employment Agreement with Dr. Johnson (2)
10.3		Employment Agreement with Mr. LeClerc(2)
10.4		Wilson Creek Agreement (3)
10.5		Form of Debenture related to March 2008 financing (5)
10.6		Form of Warrant related to March 2008 financing (5)
10.7		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 20, 2008 by and between Wave Uranium Holding and the Purchasers signatory thereto (5)
10.8		Registration Right Agreement, dated March 20, 2008 by and between Wave Uranium Holding and the Purchasers signatory thereto (5)
10.9		Security Agreement, dated March 20, 2008 by and between Wave Uranium Holding and the Purchasers signatory thereto (5)
10.10		Pledge and Security Agreement, dated March 20, 2008 by and between Wave Uranium Holding and the Purchasers signatory thereto (5)
10.11		Subsidiary Guarantee, dated March 20, 2008 of Wave Uranium (5)
10.12		Form of Lock-Up Agreement (5)
10.13		Asset Purchase Agreement with Super Rad Corporation dated August 11, 2010 (6)
10.14		Securities Exchange Agreement dated March 31, 2011 (7)
10.15		Second Addendum to Amended Stock Transfer Agreement by and among FBC Holdings, Inc. and Super Rad Corporation dated July 6, 2011 (8)
10.16		Licensing Agreement with Sport Technology, Inc. dated April 6, 2012
10.17		Consulting Agreement with Sport Technology, Inc. and Michael Kern dated April 6, 2012
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
31.2		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
32.2		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

(1)	Filed with the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 on September 27, 2006, file number 333-137,613 and incorporated by reference to this Report.
(2)	Filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 18, 2007 and incorporated by reference to this Report.
(3)	Filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 9, 2007 and incorporated by reference to this Report.
(4)	Filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, filed November 13, 2007, and incorporated by reference to this Report.
(5)	Filed with Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2008 and incorporated by reference to this Report.
(6)	Filed with Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated August 11, 2010 and incorporated by reference to this Report.
(7)	Filed with Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 2011 and incorporated by reference to the Report.
(8)	Filed with Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 12, 2011 and incorporated by reference to this Report.

2124

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	FBC Holding, Inc.
Dated: January 14, 2013		/s/ Frank Russo
Dated: April 19, 2013		/s/ Frank Russo
	By:	Frank Russo
		President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director

2225

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · FBC Holding, Inc.