UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to ______________________

Commission File No. 001-52751

	FSB Community Bankshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

United States		74-3164710
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

45 South Main Street, Fairport, New York		14450
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		Zip Code

	(585) 223-9080
(Registrant’s telephone number)

	N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days.

YES x NO o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES x NO o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

As of August 14, 2012 there were 1,785,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share, outstanding, 946,050 of which were held by FSB Community Bankshares, MHC, the Registrant’s mutual holding company.

FSB Community Bankshares, Inc.
FORM 10-Q

Index


		Page

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	1

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	2

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	3

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	5

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	32

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	32

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	32

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	32

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	32

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	32

Item 5.	Other Information	32

Item 6.	Exhibits	32

	Signature Page	34

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011

Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	1,194		$	799
Interest-earning demand deposits		7,089			8,238
Cash and Cash Equivalents		8,283			9,037

Securities available for sale		50,811			68,410
Securities held to maturity (fair value 2012 $7,427; 2011 $7,499)		7,113			7,230
Investment in FHLB stock		1,400			1,401
Loans held for sale		2,307			1,535
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses (2012 $411; 2011 $411)		137,665			126,742
Bank owned life insurance		3,320			3,265
Accrued interest receivable		694			884
Premises and equipment, net		3,430			3,654
Prepaid FDIC premium		368			437
Other assets		866			656
Total Assets	$	216,257		$	223,251

Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities

Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	4,786		$	4,523
Interest-bearing		163,657			170,579
Total Deposits		168,443			175,102

Borrowings		23,623			24,178
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		2,514			2,059
Official bank checks		536			342
Other liabilities		524			727
Total Liabilities		195,640			202,408

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock- no par value- 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common Stock- $0.10 par value – 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,785,000 shares issued and outstanding		179			179
Additional paid-in-capital		7,257			7,262
Retained earnings		13,363			13,465
Accumulated other comprehensive income		325			462
Unearned ESOP shares – at cost		(507	)		(525	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		20,617			20,843

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	216,257		$	223,251

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	2012			2011

Interest and Dividend Income
Loans	$	1,602		$	1,520
Securities – taxable		156			243
Securities – tax exempt		14			12
Mortgage-backed securities		114			215
Other		1			2
Total Interest and Dividend Income		1,887			1,992

Interest Expense
Deposits		377			461
Borrowings		180			224
Total Interest Expense		557			685

Net Interest Income		1,330			1,307
Provision for Loan Losses		7			7
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses		1,323			1,300

Other Income
Service fees		50			44
Fee income		8			6
Realized gain on sale of securities		42			24
Bank owned life insurance income		27			31
Realized gain on sale of loans		228			79
Mortgage fee income		155			41
Other		39			38
Total Other Income		549			263

Other Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		996			828
Occupancy expense		217			183
Data processing costs		32			22
Advertising		56			54
Equipment expense		159			115
Electronic banking		15			24
Directors’ fees		29			35
Mortgage fees and taxes		118			37
FDIC premium expense		38			74
Audit and taxes		18			32
Other expense		192			154
Total Other Expense		1,870			1,558

Income Before Income Taxes		2			5

Benefit for Income Taxes		(9	)		(11	)

Net Income	$	11		$	16
Earnings per common share	$	0.01		$	0.01

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	2012			2011

Interest and Dividend Income
Loans	$	3,182		$	3,044
Securities – taxable		330			507
Securities – tax exempt		29			24
Mortgage-backed securities		306			455
Other		3			4
Total Interest and Dividend Income		3,850			4,034

Interest Expense
Deposits		824			966
Borrowings		390			453
Total Interest Expense		1,214			1,419

Net Interest Income		2,636			2,615
Provision for Loan Losses		15			15
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses		2,621			2,600

Other Income
Service fees		97			88
Fee income		33			9
Realized gain on sale of securities		308			24
Bank owned life insurance income		55			61
Realized gain on sale of loans		355			125
Mortgage fee income		241			96
Other		72			68
Total Other Income		1,161			471

Other Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		1,977			1,683
Occupancy expense		433			356
Data processing costs		53			49
Advertising		120			97
Equipment expense		310			240
Electronic banking		26			46
Directors’ fees		61			67
Mortgage fees and taxes		187			92
FDIC premium expense		76			144
Audit and taxes		46			66
FHLB prepayment penalty		268			-
Other expense		407			315
Total Other Expense		3,964			3,155

Loss Before Income Taxes		(182	)		(84	)

Benefit for Income Taxes		(80	)		(54	)

Net Loss	$	(102	)	$	(30	)
Loss per common share	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.02	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	2012			2011

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Net of Tax
Net unrealized gains (losses) for the period on available for sale securities	$	(5	)	$	648
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income		(42	)		(24	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax		(47	)		624

Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(16	)		212
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax		(31	)		412

Net Income		11			16
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	(20	)	$	428

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	2012			2011

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Net of Tax
Net unrealized gains for the period on available for sale securities	$	101		$	301
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income( loss)		(308	)		(24	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax		(207	)		277

Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(70	)		94
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax		(137	)		183

Net Loss		(102	)		(30	)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	(239	)	$	153

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

	Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total
Balance – January 1, 2011	$	179	$	7,269		$	13,537		$	67		$	(560	)	$	20,492

Comprehensive income:
Net loss		-		-			(30	)		-			-			(30	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		-		-			-			183			-			183
Total Comprehensive Income																153
ESOP shares committed to be released (1,749 shares)		-		(2	)		-			-			18			16
Balance – June 30, 2011	$	179	$	7,267		$	13,507		$	250		$	(542	)	$	20,661

Balance – January 1, 2012	$	179	$	7,262		$	13,465		$	462		$	(525	)	$	20,843

Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		-		-			(102	)		-			-			(102	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		-		-			-			(137	)		-			(137	)
Total Comprehensive Loss																(239	)
ESOP shares committed to be released (1,749 shares)		-		(5	)		-			-			18			13
Balance – June 30, 2012	$	179	$	7,257		$	13,363		$	325		$	(507	)	$	20,617

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)


	2012			2011
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(102	)	$	(30	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on investments		386			369
Gain on sale of securities		(308	)		(24	)
Gain on sale of loans		(355	)		(125	)
Proceeds from loans sold		10,076			941
Loans originated for sale		(10,493	)		(1,353	)
Amortization of net deferred loan origination costs		19			7
Amortization of premium on FHLB advances		100			100
FHLB prepayment penalty		268			-
Depreciation and amortization		266			198
Provision for loan losses		15			15
Expense related to ESOP		13			16
Deferred income tax benefit		(100	)		(70	)
Earnings on investment in bank owned life insurance		(55	)		(61	)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		190			(18	)
Decrease in prepaid FDIC premium		69			135
Increase in other assets		(210	)		(20	)
Decrease in other liabilities		(33	)		(70	)
Net Cash Provided (Used) By Operating Activities		(254	)		10

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of securities available for sale		(23,912	)		(18,621	)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale		25,819			18,630
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		10,879			1,413
Proceeds from principal paydowns on securities available for sale		4,535			4,034
Purchases of securities held to maturity		-			(434	)
Proceeds from principal paydowns on securities held to maturity		110			400
Net increase in loans		(10,957	)		(2,770	)
Redemption of FHLB stock		1			61
Purchase of premises and equipment		(42	)		(256	)
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities		6,433			2,457

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net decrease in deposits		(6,659	)		(182	)
Proceeds from borrowings		9,500			4,000
Repayments on borrowings and prepayment penalty		(10,423	)		(5,627	)
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		455			361
Net increase in official bank checks		194			94
Net Cash Used By Financing Activities		(6,933	)		(1,354	)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(754	)		1,113

Cash and Cash Equivalents- Beginning		9,037			7,834

Cash and Cash Equivalents- Ending	$	8,283		$	8,947

FSB COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (Continued)

	2012		2011
Supplementary Cash Flows Information

Interest paid	$	1,228	$	1,428

Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1-Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of FSB Community Bankshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Fairport Savings Bank (collectively, the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the applicable instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, and the valuation of deferred tax assets. For additional information and disclosures required under GAAP, reference is made to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 28, 2012.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012.

Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

The consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 include the accounts of the Company, Fairport Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary, Oakleaf Services Corporation (“Oakleaf”). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts from prior periods may have been reclassified, when necessary, to conform to current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income (loss) or stockholders’ equity.

The Bank completed its conversion from a federally-chartered stock savings bank to a New York State-chartered savings bank effective June 29, 2012. As a result of the conversion the bank will be regulated by New York State’s Department of Financial Services and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Note 2-Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective reporting dates and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each reporting date.

Note 2--Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (Continued)

A fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods is used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).

An asset or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used are as follows at June 30, 2012 and at December 31, 2011:

June 30, 2012 Securities Available for Sale: (In Thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	25,005	$	-	$	25,005	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		22,485		-		22,485		-
SBA pools		3,321		-		3,321		-
Total Available for Sale Securities	$	50,811	$	-	$	50,811	$	-

December 31, 2011 Securities Available for Sale: (In Thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	33,852	$	-	$	33,852	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		31,055		-		31,055		-
SBA pools		3,503		-		3,503		-
Total Available for Sale Securities	$	68,410	$	-	$	68,410	$	-

No assets or liabilities have been measured on a non-recurring basis at or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 or at or for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Accounting guidance requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the defined fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Certain assets and liabilities are excluded from the disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

Note 2--Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (Continued)

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Cash, Due from Banks, and Interest-Earning Demand Deposits

The carrying amounts of these assets approximate their fair values.

Investment Securities

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the banking industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are based on observable market based assumptions (Level 3). In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support on certain Level 3 investments. Internal cash flow models using a present value formula that includes assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) are used to support fair values of certain Level 3 investments. The Company had no Level 3 investment securities at June 30, 2012 or at December 31, 2011.

Investment in FHLB Stock

The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock approximates its fair value based on the restricted nature of the FHLB stock.

Loans

The fair values of loans held to maturity are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

Mortgage loans held for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Separate determinations of fair value for residential and commercial loans are made on an aggregate basis. Fair value is determined based solely on the effect of changes in secondary market interest rates and yield requirements from the commitment date to the date of the financial statements. Realized gains and losses on sales are computed using the specific identification method.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates fair value.

Deposits

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., NOW accounts, non-interest checking, regular savings and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Note 2--Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (Continued)

Borrowings

The fair values of FHLB borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the quoted rates for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments

The fair values for off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and lines of credit) are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account market interest rates, the remaining terms and present credit worthiness of the counterparties. Such fees were not material at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

June 30, 2012
(In Thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	1,194	$	1,194	$	1,194	$	-	$	-
Interest-earning demand deposits		7,089		7,089		7,089		-		-
Securities available for sale		50,811		50,811		-		50,811		-
Securities held to maturity		7,113		7,427		-		7,427		-
Investment in FHLB stock		1,400		1,400		-		1,400		-
Loans held for sale		2,307		2,307		-		2,307		-
Loans, net		137,665		146,677		-		-		146,677
Accrued interest receivable		694		694		694		-		-

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		168,443		167,627		79,106		88,521		-
Borrowings		23,623		23,244		-		23,244		-
Accrued interest payable		45		45		45		-		-

December 31, 2011
(In Thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	799	$	799
Interest-earning demand deposits		8,238		8,238
Securities available for sale		68,410		68,410
Securities held to maturity		7,230		7,499
Investment in FHLB stock		1,401		1,401
Loans held for sale		1,535		1,535
Loans, net		126,742		136,550
Accrued interest receivable		884		884

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		175,102		174,046
Borrowings		24,178		23,669
Accrued interest payable		59		59

Note 3 - Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities with gross unrealized gains and losses at June 30, 2012 and at December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
June 30, 2012:
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	24,941	$	71	$	(7	)	$	25,005
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		22,133		393		(41	)		22,485
SBA pools		3,244		77		-			3,321
	$	50,318	$	541	$	(48	)	$	50,811
Held to Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities-residential	$	4,149	$	224	$	-		$	4,373
State and Municipal securities		2,964		90		-			3,054

	$	7,113	$	314	$	-		$	7,427
December 31, 2011:
Available for Sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	33,688	$	179	$	(15	)	$	33,852
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		30,578		525		(48	)		31,055
SBA pools		3,444		59		-			3,503
	$	67,710	$	763	$	(63	)	$	68,410
Held to Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities – residential	$	4,260	$	160	$	-		$	4,420
State and Municipal securities		2,970		109		-			3,079

	$	7,230	$	269	$	-		$	7,499

Mortgage-backed securities consist of securities that are issued by Fannie Mae (“FNMA”), Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”), Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”), and Federal Farm Credit Bank (“FFCB”) and are collateralized by residential mortgages.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value by contractual maturity of debt securities at June 30, 2012 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

Note 3 – Securities (continued)

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(In Thousands)				(In Thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Due after one year through five years		2,001		2,031		1,618		1,644
Due after five years through ten years		6,525		6,533		1,346		1,410
Due after ten years		16,415		16,441		-		-
Mortgage-backed securities – residential		22,133		22,485		4,149		4,373
SBA pools		3,244		3,321		-		-
	$	50,318	$	50,811	$	7,113	$	7,427

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 there was a $234,000 gross realized gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale resulting from proceeds of $10.0 million and a $74,000 gross realized gain on sale of U.S. government agency securities available for sale resulting from proceeds of $886,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 there was a $24,000 gross realized gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale resulting from proceeds of $1.4 million.

No securities were pledged to secure public deposits or for any other purpose required or permitted by law at June 30, 2012 or at December 31, 2011.

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Thousands)
June 30, 2012:
Available for Sale
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	6,031	$	6	$	511	$	1	$	6,542	$	7
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		5,022		41		-		-		5,022		41
	$	11,053	$	47	$	511	$	1	$	11,564	$	48
December 31, 2011:
Available for Sale
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	6,059	$	14	$	1,300	$	1	$	7,359	$	15
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		9,474		44		792		4		10,266		48
	$	15,533	$	58	$	2,092	$	5	$	17,625	$	63

Note 3 – Securities (continued)

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer (and guarantor, if any) and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry or geographic area, (3) failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, (4) any changes to the rating of a security by a rating agency, (5) the presence of credit enhancements, if any, including the guarantee of the federal government or any of its agencies, and (6) whether the Company intends to sell or more likely than not be required to sell the debt securities. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not record an other-than-temporary impairment charge.

At June 30, 2012, seven U.S. Government and agency securities and three mortgage-backed securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. At June 30, 2012, one U.S. Government agency security was in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more. The U.S. Government and agency securities and mortgage-backed securities were issued by U.S. government sponsored agencies. All are paying in accordance with their terms with no deferrals of interest or defaults. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, not credit quality, and because management does not intend to sell and will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity, no declines are deemed to be other-than-temporary. There were no state and municipal securities or SBA pools in a continuous loss position for less than or more than twelve months at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

Note 4 – Loans and The Allowance for Loan Losses

Net loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consist of the following:

	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)
Real estate loans:
Secured by one-to-four-family residential	$	124,275		$	113,538
Home equity lines of credit		10,256			9,425
Secured by multi-family residential		485			1,333
Construction		417			938
Commercial		2,193			1,489
Other		73			64
Total Loans		137,699			126,787

Net deferred loan origination costs		377			366
Allowance for loan losses		(411	)		(411	)
Net Loans	$	137,665		$	126,742

The loan portfolio is segmented into commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans consist of a commercial real estate class. Consumer loans consist of the following classes: residential real estate secured by one-to-four-family residences, residential real estate secured by multi-family residences, construction, home equity lines of credit, and other loans.

The Company’s primary lending activity is the origination of one-to-four-family residential real estate mortgage loans. At June 30, 2012, $124.3 million, or 90.2%, of the total loan portfolio consisted of one-to-four-family residential real estate mortgage loans compared to $113.5 million, or 89.5%, of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. The Company offers fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential real estate mortgage loans with maturities of up to 30 years and maximum loan amounts generally of up to $750,000.

Note 4 – Loans and The Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The Company currently offers fixed-rate conventional mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years that are fully amortizing with monthly loan payments, and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that provide an initial fixed interest rate for one, three, five, seven or ten years and that amortize over a period of up to 30 years. The Company originates fixed-rate mortgage loans with terms of less than 15 years, but at rates applicable to 15-year loans. The Company originates fixed-rate bi-weekly mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years that are fully amortizing with bi-weekly loan payments, and “interest only” loans where the borrower pays interest for an initial period (ten years) after which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan.

Management actively monitors the interest rate risk position to determine the desired level of investment in fixed-rate mortgages. Depending on market interest rates and the Bank’s capital and liquidity position, all newly originated longer term fixed-rate residential mortgage loans may be retained, or, all or a portion of such loans may be sold in the secondary mortgage market to government sponsored entities such as Freddie Mac or other purchasers.

The Company originates residential, first mortgage loans with the assistance of computer-based underwriting engines licensed from Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac. Appraisals of real estate collateral are contracted directly with independent appraisers and not through appraisal management companies. The Company’s appraisal management policy and procedure is in accordance with all rules and best practice guidance from the Company’s primary regulator. Credit scoring, using FICO, is employed in the ultimate judgmental credit decision by the Company’s underwriting staff. The Company does not use third party contract underwriting services. Residential mortgage loans include fixed and variable interest rate loans secured by one-to-four-family homes generally located in Monroe, Ontario, and Wayne counties of New York State. The Company’s ability to be repaid on such loans is closely linked to the economic and real estate market conditions in this region. Underwriting policies generally adhere to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines for loan requests of conforming and non-conforming amounts. In deciding whether to originate each residential mortgage, the Company considers the qualifications of the borrower as well as the value of the underlying property.

Adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally present different credit risks than fixed-rate mortgage loans primarily because the underlying debt service payments of the borrowers increase as interest rates increase, thereby increasing the potential for default. Interest-only loans present different credit risks than fully amortizing loans, as the principal balance of the loan does not decrease during the interest-only period. As a result, the Company’s exposure to loss of principal in the event of default does not decrease during this period.

The Company offers home equity lines of credit, which are primarily secured by a second mortgage on one-to-four-family residences. At June 30, 2012, home equity lines of credit totaled $10.3 million, or 7.4%, of total loans receivable compared to $9.4 million, or 7.4%, of total loans receivable at December 31, 2011.

The underwriting standards for home equity lines of credit include a determination of the applicant’s credit history, an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations, the value of the collateral securing the loan, and payments on the proposed loan. The combined loan-to-value ratio (first and second mortgage liens) for home equity lines of credit is generally limited to 90%. The Company originates home equity lines of credit without application fees or borrower-paid closing costs. Home equity lines of credit are offered with adjustable-rates of interest indexed to the prime rate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal.

Multi-family residential loans generally are secured by rental properties. Multi-family real estate loans are offered with fixed and adjustable interest rates. Loans secured by multi-family real estate totaled $485,000, or 0.4%, of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2012, compared to $1.3 million, or 1.1%, of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. Multi-family real estate loans are originated for terms of up to 20 years. Adjustable-rate multi-family real estate loans are tied to the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, subject to periodic and lifetime limitations on interest rate changes.

Note 4 – Loans and The Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Loans secured by multi-family real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one-to four-family residential mortgage loans and carry larger loan balances. This increased credit risk is a result of several factors including: the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties, and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by multi-family real estate typically depends upon the successful operation of the real estate property securing the loans. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

The Company originates construction loans for the purchase of developed lots and for the construction of single-family residences. At June 30, 2012, construction loans totaled $417,000, or 0.3%, of total loans receivable compared to $938,000, or 0.7%, at December 31, 2011. At June 30, 2012, the additional unadvanced portion of these construction loans totaled $522,000 compared to $350,000 at December 31, 2011. Construction loans are offered to individuals for the construction of their personal residences by a qualified builder.

Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, the Company requires an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser. The Company generally also reviews and inspects each property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.

Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be required to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Moreover, if the estimated value of the completed project proves to be inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the loan.

Commercial real estate loans are secured by office buildings, mixed use properties, places of worship, and other commercial properties. At June 30, 2012, $2.2 million, or 1.6%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate loans compared to $1.5 million, or 1.2%, of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2011.

The Company generally originates adjustable-rate commercial real estate loans with maximum terms of up to 15 years. The maximum loan-to-value ratio of commercial real estate loans is 70%.

Loans secured by commercial real estate generally are larger than one-to-four-family residential loans and involve greater credit risk. Commercial real estate loans often involve large loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Repayment of these loans depends to a large degree on the results of operations and management of the properties securing the loans or the businesses conducted on such property, and may be affected to a greater extent by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy in general. Accordingly, the nature of these loans makes them more difficult for management to monitor and evaluate.

The Company offers a variety of other loans secured by property other than real estate. At June 30, 2012, these other loans totaled $73,000, or 0.1%, of the total loan portfolio compared to other loans totaling $64,000, or 0.1%, of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. These loans include automobile, passbook, overdraft protection and unsecured loans. Due to the relative immateriality of other loans, the Company’s risk associated with these loans is not considered significant.

Note 4 – Loans and The Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan class and the activity in our allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each class is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular class and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other classes.

	Secured by 1-4 family residential			Secured by multi-family residential			Construction			Commercial		Home Equity			Other/ Unallocated			Total
Three months ended June 30, 2012	(In thousands)

Beginning Balance	$	287		$	4		$	1		$	21	$	48		$	43		$	404
Charge Offs		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Recoveries		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Provisions		18			-			1			1		6			(19	)		7
Ending Balance (1)	$	305		$	4		$	2		$	22	$	54		$	24		$	411

Six months ended June 30, 2011

Beginning Balance	$	289		$	10		$	5		$	15	$	47		$	45		$	411
Charge Offs		(15	)		-			-			-		-			-			(15	)
Recoveries		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Provisions		31			(6	)		(3	)		7		7			(21	)		15
Ending Balance (1)	$	305		$	4		$	2		$	22	$	54		$	24		$	411

Three months ended June 30, 2011

Beginning Balance	$	305		$	9		$	1		$	20	$	44		$	13		$	392
Charge Offs		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Recoveries		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Provisions		(28	)		(1	)		-			-		1			35			7
Ending Balance (1)	$	277		$	8		$	1		$	20	$	45		$	48		$	399

Six months ended June 30, 2011

Beginning Balance	$	242		$	9		$	3		$	14	$	55		$	61		$	384
Charge Offs		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Recoveries		-			-			-			-		-			-			-
Provisions		35			(1	)		(2	)		6		(10	)		(13	)		15
Ending Balance (1)	$	277		$	8		$	1		$	20	$	45		$	48		$	399

(1) All Loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.

The Company’s policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for the classification of loans that are considered to be of lesser quality as substandard, doubtful, or loss assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that deserve our close attention, are required to be designated as special mention. All other assets are categorized as pass.

Note 4 – Loans and The Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

When the Company classifies assets as pass, a portion of the related general loss allowances is allocated to such assets as deemed prudent. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to absorb credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the balance sheet date. The Company’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its loss allowances are subject to review by its principal regulators, the New York State Department of Financial Services and the FDIC, which can require that the Company establish additional loss allowances. The Company regularly reviews its asset portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.

The following table presents the risk category of loans by class at June 30, 2012 and at December 31, 2011:

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
At June 30, 2012
One-to-four-family residential	$	123,988	$	70	$	217		-	$	124,275
Home equity lines of credit		10,232		-		24		-		10,256
Multi-family residential		485		-		-		-		485
Construction		417		-		-		-		417
Commercial		2,193		-		-		-		2,193
Other loans		73		-		-		-		73
Total	$	137,388	$	70	$	241		-	$	137,699

At December 31, 2011
One-to-four-family residential	$	113,213		-	$	325		-	$	113,538
Home equity lines of credit		9,425		-		-		-		9,425
Multi-family residential		1,333		-		-		-		1,333
Construction		938		-		-		-		938
Commercial		1,489		-		-		-		1,489
Other loans		64		-		-		-		64
Total	$	126,462	$	-	$	325		-	$	126,787

At and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, respectively, there were no loans considered to be impaired. All loans were collectively evaluated for impairment. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company had no troubled debt restructurings.

The Company had no nonaccrual loans or foreclosed assets at June 30, 2012, and one nonaccrual loan, classified as one-to-four-family residential for $325,000 and no foreclosed assets at December 31, 2011. There were no loans that were past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Interest on non-accrual loans that would have been earned if loans were accruing interest was immaterial for both 2012 and 2011.

Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth an analysis of the age of the loan delinquencies by type and by amount past due as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Note 4 – Loans and The Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable
	(Dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2012
Real estate loans:
One-to-four-family residential	$	193	$	152	$	-	$	345	$	123,930	$	124,275
Home equity lines of credit		48		24		-		72		10,184		10,256
Multi-family residential		-		-		-		-		485		485
Construction		-		-		-		-		417		417
Commercial		-		-		-		-		2,193		2,193
Other loans		-		-		-		-		73		73
Total	$	241	$	176	$	-	$	417	$	137,282	$	137,699

At December 31, 2011
Real estate loans:
One-to-four-family residential	$	-	$	-	$	325	$	325	$	113,213	$	113,538
Home equity lines of credit		-		-		-		-		9,425		9,425
Multi-family residential		-		-		-		-		1,333		1,333
Construction		-		-		-		-		938		938
Commercial		-		-		-		-		1,489		1,489
Other loans		-		-		-		-		64		64
Total	$	-	$	-	$	325	$	325	$	126,462	$	126,787

Note 5 - Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock

Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB System to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. This restricted stock is carried at cost.

Management evaluates the FHLB stock for impairment on a quarterly basis. Management’s determination of whether this investment is impaired is based on its assessment of the ultimate recoverability of its cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.

No impairment charges were recorded related to the FHLB stock for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Note 6 – Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company has not granted any restricted stock awards or stock options and had no potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. Unallocated common shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Program (“ESOP”) are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating earnings (loss) per common share until they are committed to be released. The weighted average common shares outstanding were 1,734,270 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, 1,733,833 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, 1,730,772 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 1,730,337 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Note 7 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

Throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”), the term “the Company” refers to the consolidated entity of FSB Community Bankshares, Inc., Fairport Savings Bank, and Oakleaf Services Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fairport Savings Bank. At June 30, 2012, FSB Community Bankshares, MHC the Company’s mutual holding company parent, held 946,050 shares, or 53.0%, of the Company’s common stock, engaged in no significant activities, and was not included in the consolidated financial statements or MD&A.

Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected; competition among depository and other financial institutions; inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments; adverse changes in the securities markets; changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities; our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the Company regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital available to pay dividends; and changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.

The Company does not undertake, and specifically declines any obligation, to publicly release the results of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies

The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2012. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other consolidated financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the consolidated financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of consolidated financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the evaluation of investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment and the valuation and recoverability of deferred tax assets to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be the most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to absorb credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the balance sheet date. The amount of the allowance is based on significant estimates, and the ultimate losses may vary from such estimates as more information becomes available or conditions change. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management due to the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.

As a substantial percentage of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could significantly affect the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance. Management carefully reviews the assumptions supporting such appraisals to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. We consider a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower, results of internal loan reviews, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates by management that may be susceptible to significant change based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Various banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, also review the allowance for loan losses. Such regulators may require, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, that certain loan balances be charged off or require that adjustments be made to the allowance for loan losses when their credit evaluations differ from those of management. Additionally, the allowance for loan losses is determined, in part, by the composition and size of the loan portfolio which represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet.

The evaluation has specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard, or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is generally established when the collateral value of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance we have established which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

Other-than-temporary impairment. When the fair value of a held to maturity or available for sale security is less than its amortized cost basis, an assessment is made at the balance sheet date as to whether other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) is present.

The Company considers numerous factors when determining whether a potential OTTI exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to recover. The principal factors considered are (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer (and guarantor, if any) and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry or geographic area, (3) failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, (4) any changes to the rating of a security by a rating agency, and (5) the presence of credit enhancements, if any, including the guarantee of the federal government or any of its agencies.

For debt securities, OTTI is considered to have occurred if (1) the Company intends to sell the security, (2) it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) if the present value of expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis.

In determining whether OTTI has occurred for equity securities, the Company considers the applicable factors described above and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

For debt securities, credit-related OTTI is recognized in income while noncredit-related OTTI on securities not expected to be sold is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Credit-related OTTI is measured as the difference between the present value of an impaired security’s expected cash flows and its amortized cost basis. Noncredit-related OTTI is measured as the difference between the fair value of the security and its amortized costs less any credit-related losses recognized. For securities classified as held to maturity, the amount of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) is accreted to the credit-adjusted expected cash flow amounts of the securities over future periods. For equity securities, the entire amount of OTTI is recognized in income.

Deferred Tax Assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of temporary differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

Total Assets. Total assets decreased by $7.0 million, or 3.1%, to $216.3 million at June 30, 2012 from $223.3 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease in total assets primarily reflects decreases in securities available for sale, cash and cash equivalents, premises and equipment, and accrued interest receivable, partially offset by increases in net loans receivable, and loans held for sale.

Total securities decreased by $17.7 million, or 23.4%, to $57.9 million at June 30, 2012 from $75.6 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease in securities was a result of a $17.6 million, or 25.7%, decrease in securities classified as available for sale to $50.8 million at June 30, 2012 from $68.4 million at December 31, 2011 and a $117,000, or 1.6%, decrease in securities classified as held to maturity to $7.1 million at June 30, 2012 from $7.2 million at December 31, 2011. The $17.6 million decrease in securities classified as available for sale was attributable to maturities and calls of $25.8 million of U.S. government agency securities, $9.5 million in sales of available for sale mortgage backed securities, a $750,000 sale of U.S. government and agency obligations, $5.2 million in amortization and principal repayments received, and a $207,000 decrease in the fair value of securities classified as available for sale, partially offset by purchases of $18.1 million of U.S. government agency securities and $5.8 million of mortgage-backed securities. Securities classified as held to maturity decreased $117,000 as a result of principal repayments and amortization. All securities purchased in 2012 have been classified as available for sale to provide a portfolio of marketable securities for liquidity as an alternative to borrowings. The Company has reviewed its investment securities portfolio for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, and has determined that no other-than-temporary impairment exists in the portfolio at June 30, 2012.

Cash and cash equivalents, primarily interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, decreased by $754,000, or 8.3%, to $8.3 million at June 30, 2012 from $9.0 million at December 31, 2011. The Company continues to maintain a strong liquidity position, retaining excess cash and cash equivalent balances that will allow the Company to capitalize on investment and lending opportunities that may arise in future periods.

Loans held for sale increased $772,000, or 50.3%, to $2.3 million at June 30, 2012 from $1.5 million at December 31, 2011. Loans held for sale at June 30, 2012 are comprised of fixed rate one-to-four-family conventional mortgage loans and FHA mortgage loans originated and closed by the Company in the second quarter of 2012 that have been committed for sale in the secondary market and will be delivered and sold in the third quarter of 2012.

Premises and equipment decreased by $224,000, or 6.1%, to $3.4 million at June 30, 2012 from $3.7 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease was mainly due to the monthly depreciation of furniture and fixtures, office equipment, computer hardware, and building and leasehold improvements. Premises and equipment are recorded at cost and are generally depreciated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Furniture and equipment are generally depreciated over a useful life of three to seven years, and leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful life or the term of the lease.

Accrued interest receivable decreased $190,000, or 21.5%, to $694,000 at June 30, 2012 from $884,000 at December 31, 2011. The decrease was due primarily to a lower balance and lower yield in total securities at June 30, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011.

Net loans receivable increased $10.9 million, or 8.6%, to $137.7 million at June 30, 2012 from $126.7 million at December 31, 2011. The Company originated $38.3 million of residential mortgage loans, sold $10.5 million in the secondary market and brokered $1.5 million of USDA/Rural Housing and VA mortgage loans as a balance sheet management strategy during 2012 to reduce interest rate risk in a potentially rising interest rate environment. The Company sold these loans at a gain of $355,000 which was recorded in other income in the first six months of 2012. At June 30, 2012 the Company serviced $20.1 million in mortgage loans sold.

The credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio remains strong. The Company ended the first six months of 2012 with no non-performing loans compared to $325,000 in non-performing loans comprised of one residential property at December 31, 2011. We recorded a $15,000 provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011. The allowance for loan losses was $411,000, or 0.29% of loans outstanding, at June 30, 2012 compared to $411,000, or 0.32% of loans outstanding, at December 31, 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, we charged off $15,000 to the allowance for loan losses on the sale of a recently foreclosed real estate owned residential property. Management has evaluated the Company’s allowance for loan losses and believes it is adequate at June 30, 2012 based on the quality of the current loan portfolio. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no loans that are considered to be troubled debt restructurings. Management continues to actively monitor the performance of the loan portfolio during these difficult economic times. Credit quality continues to be the highest priority when underwriting loans. Subjective judgments about a borrower’s ability to repay and the value of any underlying collateral are made prior to approving a loan. We believe our stringent underwriting standards have directly resulted in our significantly low level of non-accruing loans.

Liabilities. Total deposits decreased by $6.7 million, or 3.8%, to $168.4 million at June 30, 2012 from $175.1 million at December 31, 2011. Core deposits including non-interest-bearing checking, NOW, savings, and MMA accounts increased by $454,000, and certificates of deposits, including individual retirement accounts (IRA), decreased by $7.1 million for the first six months of 2012 as the result of management’s prudent pricing of lower rates for non-relationship customers in the continued low interest rate environment.

Borrowings, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances, decreased by $555,000, or 2.3%, to $23.6 million at June 30, 2012 from $24.2 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease of $555,000 in the first six months of 2012 included $7.2 million in maturities and $3.0 million in prepayments of FHLB fixed rate borrowings, partially offset by $9.5 million in new FHLB fixed rate borrowings, and $100,000 in amortization of deferred premium expense.

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity decreased by $226,000, or 1.1%, to $20.6 million at June 30, 2012 from $20.8 million at December 31, 2011. There was a decrease of $137,000 in accumulated other comprehensive income, and a net loss of $102,000, partially offset by a $13,000 increase in committed ESOP shares. At June 30, 2012 the Bank was considered well capitalized, which is the highest standard of capital rating as defined by the Bank’s regulators.

Non-Performing Assets. At June 30, 2012 the Company had no loans classified as non-performing compared to one loan classified as non-performing for $325,000 at December 31, 2011 that was foreclosed and sold during the first three months of 2012. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company had no foreclosed assets. At June 30, 2012, management has evaluated the Company’s loan loss reserve and believes it is adequate based on the quality of the current loan portfolio. At June 30, 2012, there were no other assets that are not disclosed as classified or special mention in note 4 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, where known information about possible credit problems of borrowers caused us to have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result in impairment or disclosure of such loans in the future.

Average balances and yields. The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information at and for the periods indicated. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, where applicable, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income. Yields have been annualized.

	For the Three months Ended June 30,
	2012									2011
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Cost			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	134,776		$	1,602			4.75	%	$	116,447		$	1,520			5.22	%
Securities - taxable		33,969			156			1.84			41,305			243			2.35
Mortgage-backed securities		28,752			114			1.59			36,398			215			2.36
Securities - tax exempt (1)		2,966			21			2.83			2,472			18			2.91
Other		5,103			1			0.08			6,276			2			0.13
Total interest-earning assets		205,566			1,894			3.69	%		202,898			1,998			3.94	%
Non-interest-earning assets		9,827									8,257
Total assets	$	215,393								$	211,155

Interest-bearing liabilities:

NOW accounts	$	15,113			9			0.24	%	$	11,711			10			0.34	%
Passbook savings		35,057			40			0.46			24,405			19			0.31
Money market savings Individual retirement accounts		23,139			20			0.35			27,018			33			0.49
Money market savings Individual retirement accounts		16,403			70			1.71			18,646			105			2.25
Certificates of deposit		74,542			238			1.28			75,826			294			1.55
Borrowings		22,332			180			3.22			26,238			224			3.41
Total interest-bearing liabilities		186,586			557			1.19	%		183,844			685			1.49	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		4,921									4,049
Other		3,252									2,788
Total liabilities		194,759									190,681
Stockholders’ equity		20,634									20,474
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	215,393								$	211,155

Net interest income				$	1,337								$	1,313
Interest rate spread (2)								2.50	%								2.45	%
Net interest-earning assets (3)	$	18,980								$	19,054
Net interest margin (4)					2.60	%								2.59	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		110	%								110	%

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012									2011
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Cost			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	132,041		$	3,182			4.82	%	$	116,238		$	3,044			5.24	%
Securities - taxable		35,195			330			1.88			44,260			507			2.29
Mortgage-backed securities		31,317			306			1.95			34,071			455			2.67
Securities - tax exempt (1)		2,967			44			2.97			2,368			37			3.13
Other		6,013			3			0.10			6,043			4			0.13
Total interest-earning assets		207,533			3,865			3.72	%		202,980			4,047			3.99	%
Non-interest-earning assets		9,978									8,522
Total assets	$	217,511								$	211,502

Interest-bearing liabilities:

NOW accounts	$	13,950			20			0.29	%	$	11,622			22			0.38	%
Passbook savings		35,313			99			0.56			24,674			47			0.38
Money market savings Individual retirement accounts		23,664			41			0.35			27,300			82			0.60
Money market savings Individual retirement accounts		16,750			150			1.79			18,477			214			2.32
Certificates of deposit		76,507			514			1.34			76,276			601			1.58
Borrowings		22,945			390			3.40			26,270			453			3.45
Total interest-bearing liabilities		189,129			1,214			1.28	%		184,619			1,419			1.54	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		4,656									3,921
Other		2,955									2,519
Total liabilities		196,740									191,059
Stockholders’ equity		20,771									20,443
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	217,511								$	211,502

Net interest income				$	2,651								$	2,628
Interest rate spread (2)								2.44	%								2.45	%
Net interest-earning assets (3)	$	18,404								$	18,361
Net interest margin (4)					2.55	%								2.59	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		110	%								110	%

(1)	Tax-exempt interest income is presented on a tax equivalent basis using a 34 percent federal tax rate.

(2)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.

(3)	Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(4)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by total interest-earning assets.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011

General. The Company had net income of $11,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to net income of $16,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Net income per share was $0.01 for both the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and quarter ended June 30, 2011. The Company’s net interest margin for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 increased 1 basis point to 2.60% from 2.59% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, due to the decrease in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 30 basis points from 1.49% to 1.19%, which was partially offset by a decrease in the yield earned on our interest-earning assets of 25 basis points from 3.94% to 3.69%.

The $5,000 decrease in net income for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 resulted from a $312,000 increase in other expense and a $2,000 decrease in income tax benefit, partially offset by a $286,000 increase in other income and a $23,000 increase in net interest income. The increase in other expense was primarily attributable to increases in expenses related to the Perinton branch that was opened in October 2011, and increased mortgage commissions and mortgage fees and taxes with additional mortgage production in 2012, partially offset by a decrease in FDIC premium expense in 2012 compared with 2011 that resulted from changes made by the FDIC, reflecting a lower rate in the Company’s deposit insurance assessment. The increase in other income in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 was mainly due to increases in realized gain on sale of securities, realized gain on sale of loans, and mortgage fee income. The increase in net interest income is reflective of the Company’s ability to reduce its deposit and borrowing costs in a low interest rate environment, partly offset by a decrease in interest income on interest-earning assets.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income decreased by $105,000 or 5.3%, to $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The $105,000 decrease in interest and dividend income resulted from a $101,000 or 47.0%, decrease in interest income from mortgage-backed securities, an $87,000 or 35.8%, decrease in taxable securities, and a $1,000, or 50.0%, decrease in interest income from other sources, mainly interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, partially offset by an $82,000, or 5.4%, increase in interest income from loans, and a $2,000 or 16.7%, increase in interest income from tax exempt securities. Average interest-earning assets increased by $2.7 million, or 1.3%, to $205.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $202.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased by 25 basis points to 3.69% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 3.94% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The overall decrease in interest and dividend income resulted from a decrease in yield on all interest-earning asset categories, despite a volume increase in higher yielding interest-earning assets, primarily loans, for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $128,000, or 18.7%, to $557,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $685,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from significantly lower average rates paid on deposits and borrowings and lower average balances on borrowings and higher cost deposit products, mainly certificates of deposit and IRAs, in the continuing low interest rate environment. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $2.7 million, or 1.5%, to $186.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $183.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 30 basis points to 1.19% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from 1.49% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The average cost of deposit accounts decreased by 25 basis points to 0.92% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 1.17% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The average cost of borrowings decreased by 19 basis points to 3.22% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 3.41% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The average balance of borrowings decreased $3.9 million, or 14.9%, to $22.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $26.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest expense reflects the Company’s management of lower deposit and borrowing costs in a historically low interest rate environment. The Company has continued to respond to the lower interest rate environment allowing for downward deposit re-pricing of all deposits accounts and borrowings decreasing our overall cost of funds.

At June 30, 2012, the Company had $13.1 million of certificates of deposit, including IRAs that will mature during the third quarter of 2012, with a weighted average cost of 1.38%. Based on current market rates, if these funds remain with the Company with similar maturities, the rates paid on these deposits will decrease.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $23,000, or 1.8%, to $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in net interest income was due primarily to a lower average cost of deposits and borrowings and a higher average balance in higher yielding assets, primarily loans, partially offset by a decrease in yield on all interest-earning assets. The Company’s net interest margin increased 1 basis point to 2.60% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from 2.59% for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Provision for Loan Losses. Based on management’s evaluation of the factors that determine the level of the allowance for loan losses we recorded $7,000 in provision for loan losses for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011. The allowance for loan losses was $411,000, or 0.29% of loans outstanding, at June 30, 2012 compared to $399,000, or 0.34% of loans outstanding, at June 30, 2011. We ended the quarter with no non-accrual loans at June 30, 2012 compared to $325,000 in non-accrual loans at June 30, 2011. We recorded no charge offs in the second quarter of 2012 and 2011. We had no foreclosed real estate at June 30, 2012 or at June 30, 2011.

Other Income. Total other income increased $286,000, or 108.8%, to $549,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $263,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. In the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, there was a $149,000 increase in realized gain on sale of loans, a $114,000 increase in mortgage fee income, an $18,000 increase in realized gain on sale of securities, a $6,000 increase in deposit service fees, a $1,000 increase in miscellaneous other income, and a $2,000 increase in commissions from Oakleaf Services insurance/annuity and security sales, partially offset by a $4,000 decrease in bank owned life insurance income.

Other Expense. Total other expense increased $312,000, or 20.0%, to $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in other expense was primarily attributable to increases in expenses related to the Perinton branch that was opened in October 2011, and increased mortgage commissions and mortgage fees and taxes with additional mortgage production in 2012, partially offset by a decrease in FDIC premium expense in 2012 compared with 2011 that resulted from changes made by the FDIC, reflecting a lower rate in the Company’s deposit insurance assessment. The $312,000 increase included a $168,000 increase in salaries and employee benefits, an $81,000 increase in mortgage fees and taxes, a $44,000 increase in equipment expense, a $38,000 increase in miscellaneous other expenses, a $34,000 increase in occupancy expense, a $10,000 increase in data processing costs, and a $2,000 increase in advertising expense, partially offset by a $36,000 decrease in FDIC insurance premium expense, a $14,000 decrease in audit and taxes, a $9,000 decrease in electronic banking, and a $6,000 decrease in directors fees.

Income Tax Expense. We had pre-tax income of $2,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to pre-tax income of $5,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and had a $9,000 tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to a $11,000 tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease in tax benefit of $2,000. The effective tax rate was (450.00)% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to (220.00)% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The high effective tax rate in the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 were mainly due to the fact that the increase in the cash surrender value of our bank owned life insurance and municipal bond interest income exceeded pre-tax income. The New York State franchise tax recorded on taxable assets for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 exceeded the mortgage tax generated in each of these periods.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011

General. We had a net loss of $102,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss of $30,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The $72,000 increase in net loss for the first six months of 2012 compared to the first six months of 2011 was attributable to an increase in other expense of $809,000, partially offset by an increase in other income of $690,000, an increase in net interest income of $21,000, and an increase in income tax benefit of $26,000. The $809,000 increase in other expense was primarily due to increases in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment, and miscellaneous other expenses related to the Perinton branch that was opened in October 2011, increased commissions and mortgage fees and taxes with additional mortgage production in 2012, an FHLB prepayment penalty paid to eliminate the interest cost on higher rate FHLB advances in future periods, and additional advertising expenses related to the current deposit checking promotion. The $690,000 increase in other income was mainly due to increases in realized gain on sale of loans, realized gain on sale of securities, mortgage fee income, and fee income related to Oakleaf revenue, partly offset by a decrease in bank owned life insurance income. The $21,000 increase in net interest income was primarily due to a volume increase in higher interest yielding assets and the Company’s ability to reduce the cost of interest-bearing liabilities in a low interest rate environment. The $26,000 increase in income tax benefit (reduction in expense) resulted from the increase in cash surrender value of our bank owned life insurance and municipal bond interest income which are tax exempt for Federal income tax purposes.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income decreased by $184,000, or 4.6%, to $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest and dividend income resulted primarily from a $177,000, or 34.9%, decrease in interest income from taxable securities, a $149,000, or 32.7%, decrease in interest income from mortgage-backed securities, and a $1,000, or 25.0%, decrease in interest income from other sources, mainly interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank, partially offset by a $138,000, or 4.5%, increase in interest income from loans and a $5,000, or 20.8%, increase in interest income from tax exempt securities. Average interest-earning assets increased by $4.6 million, or 2.2%, to $207.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $203.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased by 27 basis points to 3.72% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 3.99% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, reflecting decreases in interest yields all interest-earning asset categories.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $205,000, or 14.4%, to $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities resulted from lower average rates paid on deposits and borrowings, despite an increase in the aggregate average balance. Average balances in interest-bearing liabilities increased $4.5 million, or 2.4%, to $189.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $184.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 26 basis points

FSB Community Bankshares Inc 10-Q