UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~ 2004

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From to

Commission File Number 0-21484

TARANTELLA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in this charter)

CALIFORNIA		94-2549086
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
425 Encinal Street, Santa Cruz, California		95060
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

425 Encinal Street, Santa Cruz, California		95060
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (831) 427-7222

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨x No x¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as ~~February~~July 2731, 2004 was 2627,~~957~~535,~~851~~280.

TARANTELLA, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~2004

Table of Contents

			Page
Part I.	Financial Information
Part I. Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
		a) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (restated)	3
		a) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	3
		b) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003	4
		b) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003	4
		c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (restated)	5
		c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	5
		d) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	3133
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3133
Part II.	Other Information
Part II. Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3234
	Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	3234
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3234
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	3235
	Item 5.	Other Information	3236
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	3337
	Signatures and certifications		3438

Part I. Financial Information

Item I. Financial Statements

TARANTELLA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months EndedDecember 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months EndedJune 30,
	2003			2002 (As restated,see Note 2)
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Net revenues:
Licenses	$	21,~~366~~575		$	2,~~362~~992		$	6,100		$	8,787
Services		1,~~102~~055			~~583~~760			3,135			2,140
Total net revenues		32,~~468~~630			23,~~945~~752			9,235			10,927
Cost of revenues:
Licenses		~~168~~218			56(14	)		588			124
Services		~~330~~434			~~258~~305			1,158			854
Total cost of revenues		~~498~~652			~~314~~291			1,746			978
Gross margin		21,~~970~~978			23,~~631~~461			7,489			9,949
Operating expenses:
Research and development		~~961~~1,149			~~987~~1,062			3,315			2,955
Selling, general and administrative		45,~~585~~233			3,~~661~~308			14,685			10,709
Restructuring charge		19			1,147
Restructuring		(26	)		101			(15	)		1,248
Total operating expenses		56,~~565~~356			54,~~795~~471			17,985			14,912
Operating loss		(24,~~595~~378	)		(31,~~164~~010	)		(10,496	)		(4,963	)
Other income (expense):
Interest income (expense), net		(7	)		32
Interest income		34			5			47			52
Other expense, net		(50	)		(14	)
Interest expense		(9	)		(1	)		(27	)		(2	)
Total other income (expense)		(57	)		18
Gain on sale of investments		718			—			718			—
Loss before income taxes		(2,652	)		(3,146	)
Impairment of investments		—			(151	)		—			(151	)
Income tax expense		98			60
Other income (expense), net		(18	)		33			(129	)		82
Net loss		(2,750	)		(3,206	)
Total other income (expense)		725			(114	)		609			(19	)
Other comprehensive income:
Loss before income taxes		(3,653	)		(1,124	)		(9,887	)		(4,982	)
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities		75			283
Income tax expense		44			122			239			280
Foreign currency translation adjustment		69			(4	)
Net loss		(3,697	)		(1,246	)		(10,126	)		(5,262	)
Total other comprehensive income		144			279
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Comprehensive loss	$	(2,606	)	$	(2,927	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(18	)		28			103			6
Net Loss per share:
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities		(508	)		71			256			177
Basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.39	)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(718	)		—			(718	)		—
Shares used in net loss per share calculation:
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,244	)		99			(359	)		183
Basic and diluted		12,689			8,206
Comprehensive loss	$	(4,941	)	$	(1,147	)	$	(10,485	)	$	(5,079	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.63	)
Shares used in net loss per share calculation:
Basic and diluted		27,392			8,764			20,077			8,403

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TARANTELLA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)	~~December~~June 3130,~~2003~~ 2004			September 30,2003
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	313,~~850~~547		$	3,151
Available-for-sale equity securities		~~708~~—			632
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $0.4 million at December 31, 2003 and $0.5 million at September 30, 2003		2,894			2,980
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $0.2 million at June 30, 2004 and $0.5 million at September 30, 2003		1,657			2,980
Other receivables		~~179~~298			175
Prepaids and other current assets		~~630~~507			720
Total current assets		816,~~261~~009			7,658
Property and equipment, net		~~612~~817			734
Acquired intangible assets, net		1,~~144~~186			1,262
Goodwill		2,395			2,391
Other assets		~~427~~263			343
Total assets	$	1220,~~839~~670		$	12,388
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Trade payables	$	~~745~~972		$	1,~~043~~341
Line of credit		—			319
Royalties payable		—			22
Royalties payable - former New Moon shareholders		1,~~723~~713			1,725
Income taxes payable		~~546~~373			549
Accrued restructuring charges		~~631~~205			854
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		43,~~204~~134			3,~~615~~317
Deferred revenues		2,~~116~~323			1,757
Total current liabilities		98,~~965~~720			9,884
Long-term deferred revenues		~~472~~1,094			36
Total long-term liabilities		472			36
Total liabilities		9,814			9,920
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, authorized 20,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, no par value, authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,279 at December 31, 2003 and 11,959 shares at September 30, 2003		129,819			126,749
Common stock, no par value, authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding 27,513 at June 30, 2004 and 11,959 shares at September 30, 2003		145,985			126,749
Deferred stock compensation		(~~530~~363	)		—
Accumulated other comprehensive income		~~697~~194			553
Accumulated deficit		(~~127~~134,~~584~~960	)		(124,834	)
Total shareholders’ equity		210,~~402~~856			2,468
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1220,~~839~~670		$	12,388

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TARANTELLA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Three Months EndedDecember 31,
	Nine Months EndedJune 30,
(In thousands)	~~2003~~2004			~~2002 (As restated, seenote 2)~~2003
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(210,~~750~~126	)	$	(35,~~206~~262	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~270~~927			~~212~~595
Foreign currency exchange loss (gain)		4363			(618	)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		1			79
Gain on sale of marketable security		(718	)		—
Stock compensation expense		22			—
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		2			82
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		343			—
Stock compensation expense		158			—
Compensation expense to former Castream shareholders		124			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of New Moon acquisition:
Trade receivables		851,324			~~507~~(298	)
Other receivables		(4123	)		—(92	)
Prepaids and other current assets		90260			~~102~~60
Other assets		~~(84~~33	)		~~262~~680
Trade payables		(~~298~~390	)		(~~189~~227	)
Royalties payable		(22	)		(53181	)
Income taxes payable		(3176	)		~~222~~10
Accrued restructuring expenses		(~~223~~649	)		~~446~~(329	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		~~607~~(240	)		(~~606~~1,154	)
Deferred revenues		~~795~~1,624			3638
Net cash used in operating activities		(17,~~471~~586	)		(25,~~227~~496	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(6	)		(127	)
Net cash received from the New Moon acquisition		—			3,323
Purchases of property and equipment		(589	)		(152	)
Additional New Moon purchase acquisition costs		(4	)		—
Change in royalties payable - former New Moon shareholders		(212	)		—(43	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(12	)		(127	)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		889			—
Net cash provided by investing activities		284			3,128
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on capital lease obligations		(1831	)		(2220	)
Line of credit payments		(319	)		—
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants		218,~~518~~049			—139
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		217,~~181~~699			(281	)
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(1	)		2(12	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		~~699~~10,396			(2,~~354~~461	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,151			7,055
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	313,~~850~~547		$	4,~~701~~594

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TARANTELLA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ~~(continued)~~

	Three Months EndedDecember 31,
	Nine Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	~~2003~~2004			~~2002~~	2003
	(Unaudited)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	~~124~~444		$	31$	305
Interest		57			—	2
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale equity securities		(462	)			177
Issuance of restricted stock to employees and director in lieu of compensation		530			—
Issuance of restricted stock in lieu of compensation		706				—
Issuance of stock and warrants to acquire Caststream assets		377				—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

Tarantella, Inc. (the “Company”) is a leading provider of Internet infrastructure software that enables web-based access to enterprise applications from virtually any client device. Headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, Tarantella operates development centers in the United States, the United Kingdom and India with sales representatives in the U.S., U.K., Germany, the Netherlands, Canada, ~~France~~Mexico, ~~the Netherlands~~France, Spain, Brazil, and Italy. Tarantella products are sold through the internet and an integrated worldwide channel of Tarantella account executives, distributors, value-added resellers, systems integrators and computer and software manufacturers. Tarantella maintains exclusive distribution relationships in Japan as well as distribution and agent relationships in China, ~~Northern~~ and Southeast Asia. In total, Tarantella products are available through resellers in more than 30 countries.

The Company was incorporated in 1979 as a California ~~Corporation~~corporation under the name The Santa Cruz Operation Inc. (“SCO”)~~, Inc~~. On May 4, 2001, SCO completed the sale of its Server Software and Professional Services ~~Divisions~~divisions to Caldera Systems, Inc., retaining the Tarantella ~~Division~~division. A new company, Caldera International, was formed which combined the assets acquired from SCO with the assets of Caldera Systems. Upon the completion of the sale, SCO changed its corporate name to Tarantella, Inc.

The Company’s flagship product, Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise 3Edition™, a UNIX/Linux-based application access suite, is installed in corporations and governmental agencies around the world. Tarantella Secure Global Desktop Enterprise 3Edition was introduced to the marketplace in 2001 as Tarantella Enterprise 3 product. Earlier client integration products, which are part of the Vision2K Suite, were introduced in the late 1990s and are currently still available. In June 2003, Tarantella acquired New Moon Systems Inc., and added New Moon Canaveral™ iQ ~~from Tarantella ®~~ (“Canaveral iQ”) to its product offering. Canaveral iQ is a Windows-based application access suite, intended for small to mid-sized business customers and departmental deployments with Windows-only infrastructure. In aggregate, Tarantella boasts over 12,000 customer sites including several of the most respected brands in the Fortune Magazine Global 2000.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, balance sheets and statements of cash flows include all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of its financial condition and results of operations as of and for the interim periods presented. The financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after all material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A. The consolidated interim results presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year. The September 30, 2003 balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, and is included for comparative purposes.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on the previously reported net loss.

Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue is derived primarily from two sources, across many industries: (i) product license revenue, derived primarily from product sales to resellers and end users, including large scale enterprises and royalty revenue, derived primarily from initial license fees, ongoing royalties from product sales by source code OEMs, and ~~software updates; and~~ (ii) services and support revenue, derived primarily from support and education and consulting services to end users.

The Company accounts for revenue under the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Product revenue is recognized upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of resulting receivables is probable. Sales to distributors are recognized upon sale by the distributor to resellers or end users. In certain instances when distributors waive their right to return product, revenue is recognized upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of resulting receivables is probable. Estimated product returns are recorded upon recognition of revenue from customers having rights of return, including exchange rights for unsold products and product upgrades.

Software revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, revenue is recognized if vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all the undelivered elements in an arrangement. Vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value is based on the price when the element is sold separately or, if not sold separately, is established by management. The fair value of services and post-contract support is determined based upon separate sales and renewal rates set forth in the contract, respectively.

The Company recognizes revenue from maintenance fees for ongoing customer support and product updates ratably over the period of the maintenance contract. Payments for maintenance fees are generally made in advance and are non-refundable. For revenue allocated to education and consulting services or derived from the separate sale of such services, the Company recognizes revenue as the related services are performed.

The Company recognizes product revenue from royalty payments upon receipt of quarterly royalty reports from OEMs (original equipment manufacturer) related to their product sales.

~~Note~~Stock 2Based –Compensation ~~Restatement~~

~~Subsequent~~The toCompany accounts for stock-based compensation arrangements under the ~~issuance~~provisions of ~~the~~Accounting ~~Company’s~~Principles ~~condensed~~Board ~~consolidated~~(“APB”) ~~financial~~Opinion ~~statements~~No. 25, “Accounting for Stock ~~the~~Issued ~~three~~to ~~months~~Employees” ~~ended~~for ~~December~~its ~~31,~~fixed ~~2002~~stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan and accordingly, has not recognized compensation cost in the ~~Company’s~~accompanying ~~management~~condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for ~~determined~~options ~~that~~issued at fair value. SFAS No. 123 permits the ~~accounting~~use ~~treatment~~of ~~initially~~either ~~afforded~~a fair value based method or the intrinsic value method to ~~certain~~measure ~~transactions~~the ~~was~~expense ~~not~~associated ~~correct~~with stock-based compensation arrangements. AsThe aCompany ~~result,~~has ~~the~~recognized ~~accompanying~~stock ~~condensed~~compensation costs ~~consolidated~~for ~~financial~~stock ~~statements~~options ~~have~~granted ~~been~~at ~~restated~~less asthan ~~described~~fair ~~below~~value on the date of grant.

The Company announced that it had become aware of business practices in the Company’s Northern European territory that required immediate changes in sales personnel within the region and certain internal controls. After conducting an internal review of certain transactions in the Northern European territory as well as other domestic and international transactions, the Company’s management determined that it was necessary to restate revenues recorded in previous interim periods of fiscal 2003 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, there were two revenue transactions, totaling $0.2 million, in Europe that did not sell out of the Company’s distributor, as the Company had believed. Since sales to distributors are recognized upon sell out by the distributor to resellers or end users, revenue for these transactions was reversed. One of these transactions sold out of inventory in subsequent quarters and revenue was recognized, and product for the other transaction was returned to the Company.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company determined that there was a revenue transaction totaling $0.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 that should have been recorded when cash was received as the customer’s ability to pay was not certain. This transaction remains unpaid and revenue will be recognized upon receipt of cash.

There were also two additional transactions in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 in the United States totaling $0.2 million where the terms of the original transaction were amended. The amendment requires that the Company recognize such revenue no earlier than receipt of payment, which occurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 for both transactions.

As a result of the reversal of these revenues, there was also a reversal of the cost of goods sold, commission expense and cooperative (“COOP”) advertising expense associated with these revenues.

AIn ~~summary~~accordance ofwith the ~~significant~~interim ~~effects~~disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, the ~~restatements~~pro onforma ~~previously~~effect ~~reported~~on ~~condensed~~the ~~consolidated~~Company’s ~~financial~~net loss ~~statements~~had iscompensation expense been recorded for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, as ~~follows~~determined under the fair value method, is shown below:

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(In thousands, except per share data)

Net loss, as reported	$	(3,697	)	$	(1,246	)	$	(10,126	)	$	(5,262	)

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss		261			10			501			10

Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards		(693	)		(1,314	)		(2,458	)		(4,069	)

Pro forma net loss	$	(4,129	)	$	(2,550	)	$	(12,083	)	$	(9,321	)

Net loss per share as reported
Basic and diluted	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.63	)

Pro forma net loss per share
Basic and diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.60	)	$	(1.11	)

	Three Months EndedDecember 31, 2002(Unaudited)
	As PreviouslyReported *			Restated
License revenues	$	3,002		$	2,362
Cost of license revenues		69			56
Research and development		979			987
Selling, general and administrative		3,723			3,661
Net loss		(2,633	)		(3,206	)
Loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.32	)	$	(0.39	)
Shares used in loss per share calculation:
Basic and diluted		8,206			8,206

The fair value of the options granted under the Option Plans and the Director Plan were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

* Amounts as previously reported reflect reclassifications made to conform to current year presentation.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
Risk-free interest rate	3.71	%	2.27	%	3.23	%	3.73	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%
Common stock volatility factor	105.0	%	100.0	%	103.3	%	100.0	%
Expected employee option life	4 years		4 years		4 years		4 years
Expected executive option life	5 years		5 years		5 years		5 years

The ~~Company~~fair isvalue infor ~~contact~~the ~~with~~Employee ~~the~~Stock Purchase ~~Securities~~Plan &rights ~~Exchange~~were ~~Commission~~also inestimated ~~connection~~at ~~with~~the andate ~~informal~~of ~~inquiry~~grant ~~related~~using toa ~~the~~Black-Scholes ~~events~~option ~~leading up~~pricing tomodel with the ~~Company’s~~following ~~restatement.~~assumptions:

Note 3 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
Risk-free interest rate	1.10	%	1.21	%	1.18	%	1.53	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%
Common stock volatility factor	109.0	%	94.0	%	107.7	%	94.0	%
Expected option life	6 months		6 months		6 months		6 months

InRecent ~~January~~Accounting ~~2003 the FASB issued FIN No. 46,~~Pronouncements “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and a revised interpretation of FIN No. 46 (“FIN No. 46-R”) in December 2003. FIN No. 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Should the Company form a variable interest entity, FIN No. 46-R will be effective at that time, but not later than the quarter ending March 31, 2004.

~~Stock~~In ~~Based~~January ~~Compensation~~2003 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and a revised interpretation of FIN No. 46 (“FIN No. 46-R”) in December 2003. FIN No. 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The Company has no interest in variable interest entities, so the adoption of FIN No. 46-R had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation arrangements under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” for its fixed stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan and accordingly, has not recognized compensation cost in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for options issued at fair value. SFAS No. 123 permits the use of either a fair value based method or the intrinsic value method to measure the expense associated with stock-based compensation arrangements. The Company has recognized stock compensation costs for stock options granted at less than fair value on the date of grant.

InNote ~~accordance~~3 ~~with~~- ~~the~~Earnings ~~interim~~Per ~~disclosure~~Share ~~provisions~~Disclosures of SFAS No. 148, the pro forma effect on the Company’s net income (loss) had compensation expense been recorded for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, as determined under the fair value method, is shown below:

	Three Months EndedDecember 31,
	2003			2002
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(2,750	)	$	(3,206	)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net loss		22			—
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards		(1,125	)		(1,386	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(3,853	)	$	(4,592	)
Net loss per share as reported
Basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.39	)
Pro forma net loss per share
Basic and diluted	$	(0.30	)	$	(0.56	)

Basic and diluted loss per share (“EPS”) were calculated as follows for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per share data):

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The principal determinants of option pricing are fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected option lives and dividend yields. Weighted average assumptions employed by the Company were: expected volatility of 100% for the three months ended December 31, 2003, 94% for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a risk-free interest rate of 2.99% and 2.75% for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively and no dividend yield for both periods. In addition, the Company assumed an expected option life of four years for non-executive employees and five years for executive employees.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Basic:
Net loss	$	(3,697	)	$	(1,246	)	$	(10,126	)	$	(5,262	)

Weighted average shares		27,392			8,764			20,077			8,403

Loss per share	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.63	)

Diluted:
Net loss	$	(3,697	)	$	(1,246	)	$	(10,126	)	$	(5,262	)

Weighted average shares		27,392			8,764			20,077			8,403
Common equivalent shares from stock options and warrants		—			—			—			—

Shares used in per share calculation		27,392			8,764			20,077			8,403

Loss per share	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.63	)

Options and warrants outstanding, not included in computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price.		1,530			1,400			1,660			2,113

Options outstanding, not included in computation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect due to net loss during the period.		8,556			1,528			7,902			825

Note 4 – Accrued Restructuring Charges

Fiscal 2004

During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company reduced the number of European countries in which it had a presence resulting in the implementation of a restructuring which reduced the existing workforce by one employee. The Company continued to reduce its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s lower than expected revenues. This reduction eliminated the Company’s presence in one European country. The Company recorded a charge of $19,000 for this restructuring for severance payments.

Note 4 - Earnings Per Share Disclosures

Basic and diluted loss per share (“EPS”) were calculated as follows for the three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months EndedDecember 31,
	2003			2002
Basic:
Net loss	$	(2,750	)	$	(3,206	)
Weighted average shares		12,689			8,206
Loss per share	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.39	)
Diluted:
Net loss	$	(2,750	)	$	(3,206	)
Weighted average shares		12,689			8,206
Common equivalent shares from stock options and warrants		—			—
Shares used in per share calculation		12,689			8,206
Loss per share	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.39	)
Options and warrants outstanding, not included in computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price.		4,548			2,730
Options outstanding, not included in computation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect due to net loss during the period.		1,848			641

Note 5 – Accrued Restructuring Charges

Fiscal 2004

The Company determined that it wanted to reduce the number of European countries in which it had a legal presence. In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company implemented a restructuring which reduced the existing workforce by one employee. This reduction eliminated the Company’s presence in one European country. The Company recorded a charge of $19,000 for this restructuring for severance payments. The remaining balance was paid in the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

Fiscal 2004 First Quarter Restructuring Accrual

(In Thousands)	Reduction in Force			Total
Restructuring charge accrued	$	19		$	19
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(15	)		(15	)
Accrual at December 31, 2003		4			4
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(4	)		(4	)
Accrual at March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004	$	—		$	—

Fiscal 2003

On July 24, 2003, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $0.4 million. The Company reduced its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s lower than expected revenues. The restructuring included a reduction in staffing of 23 employees, and the disposal of fixed assets.

The expense included a severance charge of $0.4 million for the elimination of 12 positions in the United States and 11 positions in the United Kingdom. The reductions in force affected the product development, support, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. There was also a charge of $6,508 for the disposal of fixed assets. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2003~~2004, 22all 23 positions had been eliminated. ~~The remaining 1 employee will terminate during the 2nd quarter of fiscal 2004.~~

Fiscal 2003 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Accrual

(In Thousands)	Reduction ~~inForce~~in Force			Disposal ofFixed Assets			Total
Restructuring charge accrued	$	442		$	6		$	448
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(393	)		(6	)		(399	)
Accrual at September 30, 2003		49			—			49
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(24	)		—			(24	)
Provision Adjustment		—			—			—
Accrual at December 31, 2003		25			—			25
Accrual at December 31, 2003	$	25		$	—		$	25
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(17	)		—			(17	)
Provision Adjustment		(8	)		—			(8	)
Accrual at March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004	$	—		$	—		$	—

On June 5, 2003, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $0.2 million. Also, on June 5, 2003 the Company acquired New Moon Systems, Inc. (“New Moon”). In order to keep spending levels flat with pre-acquisition levels, the Company assessed the overall resource requirements for the combined business and reduced infrastructure accordingly.

The entire restructuring charge of $0.2 million was for severance, related to the elimination of 12 positions. The positions eliminated were 9 in the USU.S., 2 in the UKU.K. and 1 in Germany. The reductions in work force affected the product development, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of September 30, 2003, all 12 ~~employees~~positions ~~were~~had ~~terminated~~been eliminated.

1211

Fiscal 2003 Third Quarter Restructuring Accrual

(In Thousands)	Reduction inForce			Total
Restructuring charge accrued	$	153		$	153
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(57	)		(57	)
Accrual at June 30, 2003		96			96
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(95	)		(95	)
Provision Adjustment		(1	)		(1	)
Accrual at September 30 and December 31, 2003	$	—		$	—
Accrual at September 30, 2003 and June 30, 2004	$	—		$	—

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $1.1 million. The Company reduced its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s continued lower than expected revenues.

A severance charge of $0.8 million included the elimination of 10 positions in the United States, 13 positions in the United Kingdom, and 2 positions in Italy. The reductions in work force affected the product development, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2002~~2003, all 25 positions ~~had~~ had been eliminated.

A facilities charge of $0.3 million was related to space the Company vacated at two locations in the U.K. This included a non-cash charge of $89,000 related to the write-off of leasehold improvements at the two vacated facilities.

The Company completed all of the cost reduction actions initiated in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 during the fiscal year. ~~Liabilities~~ ~~remain~~The lease for ~~lease~~the ~~obligation~~final onU.K. ~~one~~ facility expired in the ~~U.K.~~second ~~The~~quarter ~~lease~~of ~~for~~fiscal ~~this~~2004, ~~facility~~and ~~expires~~as atof ~~the~~June ~~end~~30, of2004, ~~the~~all ~~second~~payments ~~quarter~~related ofto ~~fiscal~~this ~~2004~~lease had been completed.

~~Fiscal~~12 ~~2003 First Quarter Restructuring Accrual~~

(In Thousands)	Reduction inForce			Facilities			Disposal ofFixed Assets			Total
Restructuring charge accrued	$	820		$	238		$	89		$	1,147
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(408	)		(24	)		(89	)		(521	)
Accrual at December 31, 2002		412			214			—			626
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(240	)		(74	)		—			(314	)
Accrual at March 31, 2003		172			140			—			312
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(113	)		(33	)		—			(146	)
Provision Adjustment		(59	)		—			—			(59	)
Accrual at June 30, 2003		—			107			—			107
Payments/utilization of the accrual		—			(34	)		—			(34	)
Accrual at September 30, 2003		—			73			—			73
Payments/utilization of the accrual		—			(23	)		—			(23	)
Accrual at December 31, 2003	$	—		$	50		$	—		$	50

Fiscal 2003 First Quarter Restructuring Accrual


*(In Thousands)*	Reduction in Force			Facilities			Disposal of Fixed Assets			Total
Restructuring charge accrued	$	820		$	238		$	89		$	1,147
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(408	)		(24	)		(89	)		(521	)

Accrual at December 31, 2002		412			214			—			626

Payments/utilization of the accrual		(240	)		(74	)		—			(314	)

Accrual at March 31, 2003		172			140			—			312

Payments/utilization of the accrual		(113	)		(33	)		—			(146	)
Provision Adjustment		(59	)		—			—			(59	)

Accrual at June 30, 2003		—			107			—			107

Payments/utilization of the accrual		—			(34	)		—			(34	)

Accrual at September 30, 2003		—			73			—			73

Payments/utilization of the accrual		—			(23	)		—			(23	)

Accrual at December 31, 2003		—			50			—			50

Payments/utilization of the accrual		—			(25	)		—			(25	)

Accrual at March 31, 2004		—			25			—			25
Provision Adjustment		—			(25	)		—			(25	)

Accrual at June 30, 2004	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

Fiscal 2002

During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $1.6 million. The Company reduced its spending levels to align its operating expenses with the Company’s lower than expected revenues. The restructuring plan included a reduction in staffing of 52 employees, a reserve for unused facilities at the Company’s corporate headquarters, and costs associated with closing several foreign offices.

This included a severance charge of $0.9 million for the elimination of 19 positions in the United States, 23 positions in the United Kingdom, and 10 positions in Japan. The reductions in force affected the product development, support, sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of March 31, 2002, all 52 positions had been eliminated.

Also included was a facilities charge of $0.7 million related to space the Company vacated. The Company had anticipated that it would sub-lease the space by December 31, 2002. As of September 30, 2003, the Company had not secured a sub-lease tenant, so provision adjustments of $0.5 million and $0.6 million were made at the end of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively. The space is now reserved through ~~September~~October 2004. The Company believes it will be able to sub-lease the space byor ~~that~~negotiate ~~date~~new terms with the landlord. The lease for this building expires on June 30, 2005. In addition, a charge was taken for expenses associated with office closures in Japan and Brazil. There was a non-cash charge of $39,000 related to fixed asset disposals at the Japan subsidiary.

The Company completed the cost reduction actions initiated in fiscal 2002, with the exception of sub-leasing excess space at the Company’s corporate headquarters in Santa Cruz, California.

Fiscal 2002 First Quarter Restructuring Accrual

(In Thousands)	Facilities			Total
Accrual at September 30, 2002		750			750
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(157	)		(157	)
Accrual at December 31, 2002		593			593
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(140	)		(140	)
Accrual at March 31, 2003		453			453
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(158	)		(158	)
Accrual at June 30, 2003		295			295
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(135	)		(135	)
Provision Adjustment		485			485
Accrual at September 30, 2003		645			645
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(158	)		(158	)
Accrual at December 31, 2003	$	487		$	487
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(142	)		(142	)
Accrual at March 31, 2004		345			345
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(164	)		(164	)
Accrual at June 30, 2004	$	181		$	181

Fiscal 2001

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company announced a restructuring plan, which resulted in a charge of $0.5 million. The restructuring charge included a reduction in personnel of 10 employees and a planned elimination of offices in Singapore and Australia. Total cash expenditures were $0.4 million.

The severance charge of $0.4 million included the elimination of 4 positions in the United States and 6 positions in the United Kingdom. The reductions in work force affected the sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. At September 30, 2001, all 10 positions had been eliminated. ~~A provision adjustment of $64,000 was made to release excess restructuring reserve, which resulted from the fact that the Company had not anticipated that the Australian office would be sub-leased.~~ The provision adjustment of $8,453 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 was for the final costs associated with closing the Australian office.

Fiscal 2001 Fourth Quarter Restructuring Accrual

(In Thousands)	Facilities			Total
Accrual at September 30, 2002	$	15		$	15
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(1	)		(1	)
Accrual at December 31, 2002		14			14
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(9	)		(9	)
Accrual at March 31, 2003	$	5		$	5
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(3	)		(3	)
Accrual at June 30, 2003	$	2		$	2
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(10	)		(10	)
Provision Adjustment		8			8
Accrual at September 30 and December 31, 2003	$	—		$	—
Accrual at September 30, 2003 and June 30, 2004	$	—		$	—

During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company announced a restructuring plan which resulted in a charge of $1.6 million, which, when taken with a provision adjustment to a previously established restructuring reserve for severance related to the sale of divisions to Caldera, resulted in a net charge for the period of $1.1 million. The restructuring charge included a reduction in personnel of 28 employees and a reserve for unused facilities. Total cash expenditures were $1.6 million.

The $1.6 million restructuring charge included a severance charge of $1.5 million for the elimination of 16 positions in the United States, 4 positions in the United Kingdom, and 8 positions in various other geographies. The reduction in work force affected the sales, marketing and general and administrative functions of the Company. As of September 30, 2001, all 28 positions had been eliminated. The Company vacated additional space within its Santa Cruz, California office in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, and an additional charge of $81,000 was recorded for estimated payments on the lease for an additional 12 months. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, an additional charge of $85,000 was recorded and in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, an additional charge of $64,000 was recorded because the facility was not yet sub-leased. The facility was not sub-leased as of September 30, 2003 and the restructuring reserve at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 covers rents through ~~September~~October ~~30,~~ 2004. The Company believes it will be able to sub-lease the space or bynegotiate ~~that~~new ~~date~~terms with the landlord. The lease for this building expires on June 30, 2005.

Fiscal 2001 Second Quarter Restructuring Accrual

(In Thousands)	Facilities			Total
Accrual at September 30, 2002	$	106		$	106
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(22	)		(22	)
Accrual at December 31, 2002		84			84
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(20	)		(20	)
Accrual at March 31, 2003		64			64
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(22	)		(22	)
Accrual at June 30, 2003		42			42
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(19	)		(19	)
Provision Adjustment		64			64
Accrual at September 30, 2003		87			87
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(22	)		(22	)
Accrual at December 31, 2003	$	65		$	65
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(19	)		(19	)
Accrual at March 31, 2004		46			46
Payments/utilization of the accrual		(22	)		(22	)
Accrual at June 30, 2004	$	24		$	24

Note 65 - Industry and Geographic Segment Information

The company operates and is managed internally as one operating segment in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. Operating segments are defined as component of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The following table presents information on revenue and long-lived assets by geography. Revenue is allocated based on the location from which the sale is satisfied and long-lived asset information is based on the physical location of the asset.

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2003		2002
	(In thousands)
Net revenues:
United States	$	1,278	$	963
Canada and Latin America		320		177
EMEIA (1)		1,534		1,186
Asia Pacific		336		602
Corporate adjustments		—		17
Total net revenues	$	3,468	$	2,945
	December 31, 2003		September 30, 2003
	(In thousands)
Long-lived assets:
United States	$	4,242		4,381
EMEIA (1)		336		349
Total long-lived assets	$	4,578	$	4,730

(1) Europe, Middle East, India and Africa

Note 7 - Investments


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
*(In Thousands)*	2004		2003		2004		2003
Net revenues:
United States	$	1,305	$	1,606	$	3,940	$	5,017
Canada and Latin America		204		160		889		557
Europe, Middle East, India and Africa		949		1,488		3,555		3,904
Asia Pacific		172		489		851		1,424
Corporate adjustments		—		9		—		25

Total net revenues	$	2,630	$	3,752	$	9,235	$	10,927

Available-for-sale equity securities:


	June 30, 2004		September 30, 2003
Long-lived assets:
United States	$	4,479	$	4,381
Europe, Middle East, India and Africa		182		349

Total long-lived assets	$	4,661	$	4,730

AtNote ~~December~~6 ~~31, 2003, the Company held 505,767 shares of Rainmaker stock. The Company accounts for this investment as available~~-~~for-sale,~~ ~~and accordingly, records it at~~Investments fair market value based on quoted market prices. Any unrealized gains or losses are included as part of accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair market value of the investment at December 31, 2003 was $708,074 and the cost was $170,830 resulting in an unrealized gain of $537,244. Rainmaker’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq under the symbol “RMKR”.

~~Note~~Available-for-sale 8equity –securities ~~Reverse Stock Split~~

OnDuring ~~November 14, 2002,~~ the ~~Board~~third quarter of ~~Directors~~fiscal ~~unanimously~~2004, ~~adopted resolutions approving and recommending to~~ the ~~shareholders~~Company ~~for~~sold ~~their~~505,767 ~~approval~~shares ~~a series~~ of ~~amendments~~Rainmaker tostock. ~~the~~The Company’s ~~Amended~~accounted ~~and~~for ~~Restated~~this ~~Articles~~investment ofas ~~Incorporation~~available-for-sale, toand ~~effect~~accordingly, arecorded ~~reverse~~it ~~stock split of the Company’s Common Stock~~ at afair ~~ratio~~market tovalue bebased ~~determined~~on byquoted ~~the~~market ~~Company’s Board of Directors~~prices. OnThe ~~February 27, 2003, the stockholders approved amendments to the~~ Company’s ~~Amended~~received ~~and~~cash ~~Restated Articles~~ of ~~Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split~~$0.9 Onmillion ~~May~~and ~~19,~~recorded ~~2003, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the implementation of~~ a ~~reverse~~gain ~~split~~on ~~with~~investments ~~a ratio~~ of ~~one~~$0.7 ~~for five~~million. OnThe ~~June~~cost of ~~6, 2003,~~ the ~~Company~~investment ~~implemented~~was ~~a one-for-five reverse split and the Company’s outstanding common shares were reduced from 49~~$0.72 million ~~shares to approximately 9~~.9 ~~million shares.~~ The ~~reverse~~Company ~~stock~~no ~~split~~longer ~~has~~holds ~~been~~any ~~retroactively reflected~~shares inof ~~the~~Rainmaker ~~accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for all periods presented~~stock.

Note 97 – Business Combinations

Acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc.

On June 5, 2003, Tarantella completed the acquisition of New Moon Systems, Inc., a privately held California corporation (“New Moon “”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”), dated May 29, 2003. New Moon, headquartered in San Jose, CA, develops software to simply and cost-effectively manage and deploy Windows-based applications to end-user desktops in small and medium-sized businesses, as well as enterprise departmental customers. New Moon Canaveral ™ iQ from Tarantella ® (“Canaveral iQ”) extends the capabilities of Microsoft’s Windows Terminal Services and answers the demand for a simple and intelligent means of centrally managing remote applications.

Pursuant to the Agreement, Tarantella issued a total of 1,592,000 shares of Tarantella common stock valued at $3.6 million in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of New Moon and to satisfy its obligations to the former employees of New Moon. The fair value of the Company’s common stock was determined based on the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock over the five day period including the two days before and after the terms of the acquisition were agreed to and announced. The New Moon shareholders shall also receive a minimum cash ~~earnout~~earn out of approximately $1.7 million over a period from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006 based on a royalty of 30% of New Moon product revenues, net of direct costs. After the shareholders have been paid the minimum ~~earnout~~earn out, they would be entitled to an additional royalty of 15% of New Moon product revenues, net of direct costs, during this period. In the event the minimum ~~earnout~~earn out is not achieved by the conclusion of the quarter ending December 31, 2006, Tarantella shall pay along with the final ~~earnout~~earn out payment an amount equal to the minimum ~~earnout~~earn out less all aggregate earn ~~earnouts~~outs paid to date, less any off-sets and any escrow claim deficiencies. The Company also incurred approximately $0.3 million of direct merger costs, for a total purchase price of approximately $5.7 million.

The residual purchase price of $2.4 million was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill relating to the New Moon acquisition is not being amortized and will be carried at cost and tested for impairment annually and whenever events indicate that an impairment may have occurred. As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~2004, the Company has incurred acquisition costs of $331,000. This increased by $4,000 from September 30, 2003 since the Company incurred further legal costs related to the acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price to goodwill is subject to change as more information becomes available related to legal costs incurred for the acquisition.

The following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 as if the New Moon acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the periods presented and at the purchase price established at the time of the acquisition:

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended June 30,			Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2003			2003
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net revenues	$	3,844		$	11,208
Net loss	$	(3,626	)	$	(11,828	)
Loss per share	$	(0.35	)	$	(1.18	)

The pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if the acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of the earliest period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results.

~~Note~~Acquisition 10of ~~– Acquired Intangible Assets~~Caststream, ~~Net~~Inc.

	December 31, 2003
	Gross CarryingAmount		EstimatedUsefulLives	AccumulatedAmortization		IntangibleAssets, Net
	(In thousands)		(In years)
Amortized intangible assets
Technology	$	500	3	$	97	$	403
Patents		700	3		136		564
Trademarks		200	3		39		161
Other		20	3		4		16
Total	$	1,420		$	276	$	1,144
Aggregate amortization expense:
For three months ended December 31, 2002	$	0
For three months ended December 31, 2003	$	118
Estimated remaining amortization expense:
For year ending September 30, 2004	$	355
For year ending September 30, 2005		473
For year ending September 30, 2006		316
	$	1,144

On March 29, 2004, the Company entered into a Stock Exchange Agreement with Caststream, Inc. (“Caststream”). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of Caststream in exchange for 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants for 100,000 shares of common stock. The Company also assumed certain liabilities of Caststream of approximately $40,000. The transaction was considered a related party transaction because two of the Caststream shareholders were hired in December 2003 as the Company’s Vice President of Corporate Development and Chief Marketing Officer. In addition, the Company hired three other Caststream shareholders in December 2003 in various marketing and technical positions. The Company’s Audit Committee and the Board of Directors approved the transaction.

The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase of assets by the Company for financial reporting purposes. Beginning March 30, 2004, the results of Caststream are being included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The purchase price has been allocated based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Pursuant to the Emerging Issues Task Force’s Issue No. 98-3, “Determining Whether a Non-monetary Transaction Involves the Receipt of Productive Assets or of a Business”, Caststream does not meet the criteria necessary to qualify as a business. Therefore, the Company’s acquisition of Caststream does not qualify as a business combination under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and no goodwill resulted from recording the transaction. Identified intangible assets with finite lives will be amortized over their respective estimated useful life. The Company is required to review long-lived assets when circumstances indicate that an impairment exists. To the extent the value of the long-lived assets are impaired, the Company will be required to record the impairment charge. The fair market value of the Company’s stock and stock warrants, issued net of liabilities assumed exceeds the fair market value of the acquired assets based upon an independent, third party appraisal. This excess value has been charged to operations upon the close of the merger as compensation expense.

The total purchase price for Caststream is $432,000 as follows (in thousands):


Fair value of Tarantella common stock	$	227
Fair value of Tarantella common stock warrants		150
Liabilities assumed		40
Acquisition costs		15

Total consideration	$	432

The allocation of the purchase price is based upon an independent, third-party appraisal and management’s estimates as follows (in thousands):


Technology	$	304
Compensation expense		124
Computer equipment		4

Total purchase price	$	432

Note 118 – ~~Indemnification~~Acquired ~~and~~Intangible ~~Warranties~~Assets, Net

The components of acquired intangible assets as of June 30, 2004 is as follows:


	Gross Carrying Amount		Estimated Useful Lives	Accumulated Amortization		Intangible Assets, Net
	*(In thousands)*		*(In years)*	*(In thousands)*
Amortized intangible assets
Technology	$	804		$	206	$	598
Patents		700	3		253		447
Trademarks		200	3		72		128
Other		20	3		7		13

Total	$	1,724		$	538	$	1,186

The components of acquired intangible assets as of September 30, 2003 is as follows:


	Gross Carrying Amount		Estimated Useful Lives	Accumulated Amortization		Intangible Assets, Net
	(In thousands)		(In years)	(In thousands)
Amortized intangible assets
Technology	$	500	3	$	56	$	444
Patents		700	3		78		622
Trademarks		200	3		22		178
Other		20	3		2		18

Total	$	1,420		$	158	$	1,262

Aggregate amortization expense
For three months ended June 30, 2004	$	143

For three months ended June 30, 2003	$	39

For nine months ended June 30, 2004	$	380

For nine months ended June 30, 2003	$	39

Estimated remaining amortization expense:
For remaining three months ending September 30, 2004	$	143
For year ending September 30, 2005		575
For year ending September 30, 2006		417
For year ending September 30, 2007		51

	$	1,186

Note 9 – Private Placement Financing

On September 30, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to Special Situations Technology Funds and Vertical Ventures resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,254,200 for which the Company paid fees of $155,345. The Company issued 1,950,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.156 per share and warrants to purchase 1,950,000 shares of common stock at $1.395 per share. The warrants have a value of $895,592, based on the relative fair value using a Black-Scholes calculation, using a volatility of 100%, an annual dividend of zero and a discount rate of 2.63%. The Company can require the warrant holders to exercise one-third of the warrants provided the shares issuable there under are registered with the SEC and the share price equals or exceeds $1.674 for a period of twenty consecutive trading days. In addition, the Company can redeem up to two-thirds of the warrants or all of the warrants for $0.01 per share should the closing bid price of the shares reach the target prices of $2.232 and $2.790, respectively. The warrant holders may exercise the warrants prior to redemption. The warrants expire on September 30, 2008. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $2,700,000. The Company has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants. If the shares and warrants are not registered in a timely manner, the Company will be obligated to pay damages for the delay, in an amount equal to one-percent per month of the aggregate amount invested, until registered.

On December 26, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to Special Situations Technology Funds, Starlight Technology Partners LLC, an investment group in which the President of the Company acts as Managing Director and the Company’s Vice President of OEM sales is an investor, and an additional private investor, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,750,000. In connection with the financing, the Company paid placement fees in the amount of $91,250 and issued 140,000 shares of common stock. The Company issued 2,750,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share and warrants to purchase 550,000 shares of common stock at $1.39 per share. The warrants have a value of $310,624 based on the relative fair value using a Black-Scholes calculation, using a volatility of 100%, an annual dividend of zero and a discount rate of 3.20%. The warrants expire on December 11, 2008. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of $764,500. The Company has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants.

On February 23, 2004, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to various investors. In the private placement, the investors purchased 11,678,580 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.40 per share. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,335,714 shares at an exercise price of $1.70 per share for gross proceeds of $16,350,000. The warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $3,970,714. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale. In connection with the financing, the Company incurred fees in the amount of $1,198,000, which included placement agent fees, legal and accounting fees, and warrants to purchase 322,500 shares at $1.70 per share. The warrants have lives of five years.

On March 29, 2004, the Company completed an agreement pursuant to which it issued 140,000 shares in lieu of payment of a finders fee for the December 2003 private placement.

Note 10 – Indemnification and Warranties

Indemnification

The Company licenses its software and services pursuant to a software license agreement, in which the Company agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the customer against damages arising out of claims filed by third parties that the Company’s products infringe any copyright or other intellectual property right. The term of the indemnification is generally perpetual, limited by applicable statutes of limitations. The license agreement generally limits the scope of the remedies for such indemnification obligation, including but not limited to certain product usage limitations and the right to replace an infringing product or modify it to make it non-infringing. If the Company cannot address the infringement by replacing or repairing the product, the Company is allowed to cancel the license and return the fees paid by the customer. The Company has never incurred expense under such indemnification provisions. The Company believes that the ~~estimated~~expense ~~fair~~from ~~value of~~ these indemnification agreements is minimal.

As permitted under California law, the Company has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events while the officer or director is, or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a ~~Director~~Directors’s and ~~Officer~~ Officers’s insurance policy that limits the Company’s exposure and enables it to recover at least a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes that the expense ~~estimated~~from ~~fair value of these~~ indemnification agreements is minimal.

Warranties

The Company generally warrants for a period of 90 days that its software products will perform substantially in accordance with its published specifications, that the reproduction of the software on the media material provided by the Company is correct and that the documentation is correctly printed. In the event of any non-conformance, the Company agrees to repair, replace or accept return of the non-conforming product and refund any fees paid by the customer for said non-conforming product. The Company has never incurred significant expense under its product warranties. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these warranty agreements is immaterial.

Note 12 – Subsequent Events

Acquisition

On March 29, 2004 the Company announced the acquisition of privately held Caststream, Inc. (“Caststream”), developer of cast:stream Enterprise e-learning and presentation broadcasting software. Cast:stream incorporates real-time streaming audio and video, instant messaging synchronized with interactive, immersive, rich media. This creates advanced collaboration, learning and training presentations available via any Internet connection. As a result of the acquisition, Caststream will relocate its operations from its headquarters in Saratoga, California to Tarantella’s corporate headquarters in Santa Cruz, California. Steve Bannerman, Founder and CEO of Caststream, Inc. will continue as Tarantella’s Vice President of Corporate Marketing, a post he has held since December 2003. In addition to Mr. Bannerman, other Caststream employees have joined Tarantella in various technical, marketing and sales positions.

Under the terms of the transaction, Tarantella purchased all of the outstanding Caststream capital stock in exchange for a total of 200,000 shares of Tarantella common stock and warrants. In addition, Tarantella agreed to assume certain liabilities estimated to be approximately $40,000. The Tarantella stock and warrants are to be deposited into escrow for a one year period to fund Caststream’s indemnification obligations. Tarantella has agreed to register the common stock and warrants being issued to Caststream’s stockholders as soon as practicable once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The acquisition is considered a related party transaction under applicable securities laws because certain Tarantella executive officers held a direct interest in Caststream prior to the transaction.

Management Change

On January 6, 2004, the Company announced the appointment of John M. Greeley as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), reporting directly to Frank Wilde, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Greeley assumed the CFO responsibilities from Mr. Mohan, who had been serving as acting CFO since September 8, 2003.

Private Placement

On February 23, 2004, the Company announced the completion of a private placement of common stock and warrants to various investors. In the private placement, the investors purchased 11,678,580 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.40 per share for gross proceeds of $16,350,000. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,335,714 shares at an

exercise price of $1.70 per share. The warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $3,970,714. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In connection with the financing, the Company will pay fees in the amount of $1,074,000 and issue warrants to purchase 142,500 shares at $1.54 per share and 180,000 shares at $1.70 per share. The warrants have lives of three and five years, respectively.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. In addition to historical information contained herein, this Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “estimates,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “future,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “intends,” “believes,” and similar expressions. Examples of forward-looking statements include those relating to financial risk management activities, ~~and~~ the adequacy of financial resources for operations, the Company’s ability to sublease our Santa Cruz, California office space and the Company’s ability to become listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. These and other forward-looking statements are only estimates and predictions. While the Company (also referred to as “Tarantella”) believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company’s actual results could differ materially. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s expectations only as of the date hereof.

Overview

Tarantella is a leading provider of ~~Internet~~internet infrastructure software that enables web-based access to enterprise applications.

Tarantella’s products provide managed and secure web access to enterprise mainframe, Windows, AS/400, Linux, and UNIX applications. ItThe Company leverages existing IT assets to provide cost savings, improved productivity, and the flexibility to accommodate the rapid changes in today’s organizations.

~~Restatement~~Applications of Critical Accounting Policies

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended December 31, 2002 the Company’s management determined that the accounting treatment initially afforded to certain transactions was not correct. As a result, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 have been restated.

The effects of the restatement are presented in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements and have been reflected in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the three fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 2003. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported on the Company’s balance sheets and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each of our fiscal periods are affected by estimates and assumptions which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for revenue, bad debts, product returns, certain accrued expenses, restructuring and liabilities and a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s ~~revenue~~accounts isfor ~~derived~~the ~~primarily~~licensing ~~from~~of ~~two~~software ~~sources,~~in ~~across~~accordance ~~many~~with ~~industries:~~American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (i“AICPA”) ~~products~~Statement ~~license~~of ~~revenue~~Position (“SOP”) 97-2, ~~derived~~“Software ~~primarily~~Revenue ~~from~~Recognition”, ~~product~~as ~~sales~~amended. toThe ~~resellers~~application ~~and~~of ~~end~~SOP ~~users~~97-2 requires judgment, including ~~large~~whether ~~scale~~a ~~enterprises~~software arrangement includes multiple elements, and ~~royalty~~if ~~revenue~~so, ~~derived~~whether ~~primarily~~vendor-specific ~~from~~objective ~~initial~~evidence ~~license~~(“VSOE”) ~~fees,~~of ~~ongoing~~fair ~~royalties~~value ~~from~~exists ~~product~~for ~~sales~~those byelements. ~~source~~End ~~code~~users receive certain elements of our products over a period of time. These elements include free post-delivery ~~OEMs,~~telephone support and ~~software~~the ~~updates;~~right ~~and~~to ~~(ii)~~receive ~~services~~unspecified upgrades/enhancements of our products on a when-and-if-available ~~support~~basis. ~~revenue~~Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, ~~derived~~the ~~primarily~~ability ~~from~~to ~~support~~identify VSOE for those elements and ~~education~~the fair value of the respective elements could materially impact the amount of our earned and ~~consulting~~unearned ~~services~~revenue. Judgment is also required to ~~end~~assess ~~users~~whether future releases of certain software represent new products or upgrades and enhancements to existing products. Judgment is also required in the Company’s on-going evaluation of our customers’ credit worthiness at the time of sale.

~~The~~New ~~Company~~Moon accounts for revenue under the provisions of AICPA Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. Product revenue is recognized upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and ~~determinable~~Caststream ~~and~~Acquisitions collection of resulting receivables is probable. Sales to distributors, are recognized upon sale by the distributor to resellers or end users. In certain instances when distributors waive their right to return product, revenue is recognized upon shipment if evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection of resulting receivables is probable. Estimated product returns are recorded upon recognition of revenue from customers having rights of return, including exchange rights for unsold products and product upgrades.

In connection with the New Moon and Caststream acquisitions, the Company allocated the purchase price associated with each acquisition to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and in-process research and development based on their estimated fair values. The Company engaged a third-party appraisal firm to assist us in determining the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Such valuations required us to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. The critical estimates the Company used in allocating the purchase price and valuing certain intangible assets include but were not limited to: future expected cash flows from customer contracts, acquired developed technologies and patents, expected costs to develop the in-process research and development into commercially viable products, estimated cash flows from the projects when completed, the trade name and the market position of the acquired products, and assumptions about the period of time the trade name will continue to be used in the New Moon product portfolio, determining the appropriate discounts rates and other assumptions. The Company’s estimates of fair value at the time when they were made are based upon assumptions that we believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 142 (“SFAS 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, and determining the fair value of each reporting unit. The Company will perform the annual goodwill impairment test as of July 1st every

~~Software~~year ~~revenue~~to isdetermine ~~recognized~~if ~~using~~there ~~the residual method. Under the residual method revenue~~ is ~~recognized~~any ~~if vendor-specific~~goodwill ~~objective~~impairment. ~~evidence~~Significant ofjudgments ~~fair~~required ~~value~~to ~~exists~~estimate ~~for all~~ the ~~undelivered elements in an arrangement. Vendor-specific objective evidence of~~ fair value isof reporting ~~based~~units oninclude ~~the~~estimating ~~price~~future ~~when~~cash ~~the element is sold separately or~~flows, ifdetermining ~~not~~appropriate ~~sold~~discount ~~separately,~~rates ~~is established~~and byother ~~management~~assumptions. ~~The~~Changes ~~fair~~in ~~value~~these ofestimates ~~services~~ and ~~post~~assumptions ~~contract~~could ~~support~~materially isaffect ~~determined~~the ~~based~~determination ~~upon~~of ~~separate~~fair ~~sales~~value and/or ~~renewal~~goodwill ~~rates~~impairment ~~set~~for each ~~forth~~reporting ~~in the contract, respectively~~unit.

~~The~~Restructuring ~~Company recognizes revenue from maintenance fees for ongoing customer support and product updates ratably over the period of the~~charges maintenance contract. Payments for maintenance fees are generally made in advance and are non-refundable. For revenue allocated to education and consulting services or derived from the separate sale of such services, the Company recognizes revenue as the related services are performed.

~~The~~Over the last several years the Company ~~recognizes~~has ~~product~~undertaken ~~revenue~~significant ~~from~~restructuring ~~royalty~~initiatives, ~~payments~~which ~~upon~~have ~~receipt~~required the Company to develop formalized plans for exiting certain business activities. These plans have required the Company to record estimated expenses for severance, lease cancellations, long-term asset write downs, and other restructuring costs. Given the significance of, ~~quarterly~~and ~~royalty~~the ~~reports~~timing ~~from~~of ~~OEMs~~the (execution of, such activities, this process is complex and involves periodic reassessments of estimates made at the time the original ~~equipment~~decisions ~~manufacturer)~~were ~~related~~made. The Company’s policies, as supported by current authoritative guidance, require the Company to ~~their~~continually ~~product~~evaluate ~~sales~~the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under our restructuring activities. As management continues to evaluate the business, there may be additional charges for new restructuring activities as well as changes in estimates to amounts previously recorded.

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and does not require collateral. The Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses and such losses have been within management’s expectations.

Returns and Reserves

The Company’s recognition of revenue from sales to distributors is affected by agreements giving distributors the right to return up to ten percent of the amount of the last ninety days of the distributor’s software sales. Historically, the return rate has averaged less than ten percent. The Company records a provision for product returns for related sales in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, ~~analysis~~analyses of credit memo data and other known factors. If the historical data ~~the~~we ~~Company~~use ~~uses~~ to calculate these estimates dodoes not properly reflect future returns, revenue could be affected. Accordingly, estimating product returns requires significant management judgment. In addition, different return rates estimates that the Company reasonably could have used would have had a material impact on reported sales and thus have had a material impact on the presentation of the results of operations

Allowance for ~~doubtful~~Doubtful ~~accounts~~Accounts

Payments from customers are continuously monitored and allowances are maintained for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. When evaluating the adequacy of allowances for doubtful accounts, various factors are taken into ~~account~~consideration, including accounts receivable aging, customer credit-worthiness, historical bad debts, and geographic and political risk. While the Company’s credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the allowance established, we might not continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. ~~As of December 31, 2003, the Company’s net accounts receivable balance was $2.9 million.~~

Accounting for Income Taxes

~~Tarantella~~SFAS ~~has~~109, ~~operations~~“Accounting infor Income ~~many~~Taxes”, ~~countries~~establishes ~~other~~financial ~~than~~accounting and reporting standards for the ~~United~~effect ~~States~~of income taxes. ~~Transfer~~The ~~prices~~objectives of accounting for ~~services~~income ~~provided~~taxes ~~between~~are to recognize the ~~United~~amount ~~States~~of ~~and~~taxes ~~these~~payable ~~countries~~or ~~have~~refundable ~~been~~for the current year and deferred ~~documented~~tax asliabilities ~~reasonable,~~and ~~however,~~assets for the future tax ~~authorities~~consequences ~~could~~of ~~challenge~~events ~~these~~that ~~transfer~~have ~~prices~~been ~~and~~recognized ~~assess~~in ~~additional~~an ~~taxes~~entity’s onfinancial ~~prior~~statements ~~period~~or ~~transactions~~tax returns. ~~Any~~Judgment ~~such~~is ~~assessment~~required ~~could~~in ~~require~~assessing the ~~Company~~future totax ~~record~~consequences anof ~~additional~~events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax ~~provision~~returns. Fluctuations in ~~its~~the ~~statement~~ actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially affect our financial position or our results of operations.

~~Income tax assets and liabilities are determined by taxable jurisdiction.~~ The Company ~~evaluates~~has ~~net~~operations ~~deferred~~in ~~tax~~many ~~assets~~countries inother ~~each~~than ~~tax~~the ~~jurisdiction~~United byStates. ~~estimating~~Transfer ~~the~~prices for ~~likelihood~~services ofprovided between the ~~Company~~United ~~generating~~States ~~future~~and ~~profits~~these tocountries ~~realize~~have ~~these~~been ~~assets.~~documented ~~The~~as ~~Company~~reasonable, ~~has~~however, ~~assumed~~tax ~~that~~authorities itcould ~~will~~challenge ~~not~~these ~~generate~~transfer ~~sufficient~~prices ~~future taxable~~and ~~income~~assess toadditional ~~realize~~taxes ~~these~~on ~~assets~~prior ~~and~~period ~~has~~transactions. ~~created~~Any ~~valuation~~such ~~reserves~~assessment could torequire ~~reduce~~that the ~~net~~Company ~~deferred~~record an additional tax ~~asset~~provision ~~values~~in toour ~~zero~~statement of operations.

~~Restructuring~~Income tax assets and liabilities are determined by taxable jurisdiction. The Company evaluates net deferred tax assets in each tax jurisdiction by estimating the likelihood of generating future profits to realize these assets. The Company has assumed that we will not generate sufficient future taxable income to realize these assets and have created valuation reserves to reduce the net deferred tax asset values to zero.

~~During~~De-Listing ~~fiscal~~Status 2004 and fiscal 2003, the Company recorded several reserves in connection with restructuring programs. These reserves include estimates for employee severance, facility redundancies and disposal of fixed assets. Actual costs have not differed materially from these estimates.

~~Goodwill~~On ~~and~~October ~~Other~~20, ~~Intangible~~2003, ~~Assets~~the Company announced that it had received notification from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel (the “Nasdaq Panel”) that the Company’s stock would discontinue trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on Tuesday, October 21, 2003.

Intangible assets have been recorded in connection with the acquisition on New Moon Systems Inc. The cost of the acquisition was allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, with the remaining amount being classified as goodwill. Certain identifiable intangible assets such as purchased technology and customer lists are amortized to operating expense over time. Under current accounting guidelines adopted on July 1, 2002, goodwill will not be amortized to expense but rather periodically assessed for impairment. Accordingly, the allocation of the acquisition cost to identifiable intangible assets and goodwill has a significant impact on our future operating results. The allocation process requires extensive use of estimates and assumptions,

~~including~~This ~~estimates~~action offollowed ~~future~~Tarantella’s ~~cash~~appeal ~~flows~~to ~~expected~~Nasdaq tofor bea ~~generated~~listing byextension ~~the~~after ~~acquired~~not ~~assets.~~meeting ~~Further,~~the ~~when~~stated ~~impairment~~time ~~indicators~~requirements ~~are identified with respect~~ to ~~previously~~file ~~recorded~~SEC ~~intangible~~Form ~~assets,~~10-Q ~~the~~for ~~values of~~ the ~~assets are determined using valuation techniques that require significant management judgment. Should conditions be different than management~~Company’s ~~current~~ ~~assessment,~~third ~~material~~quarter ~~write-downs~~ of ~~intangible~~fiscal ~~assets may be required~~2003. The ~~Company~~Nasdaq ~~will~~Panel ~~perform~~determination ~~the~~to ~~annual~~delist ~~goodwill~~the ~~impairment~~Company’s ~~test~~stock aswas ofbased ~~July~~on 1,the ~~2004~~Company’s tofiling ~~determine~~delinquency, ifpublic ~~there~~interest ~~is any goodwill impairment. Under SFAS 142~~concerns, ~~goodwill~~ and ~~intangible assets of a reporting unit shall be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce~~ the ~~fair~~nature ~~value~~ of the aongoing ~~reporting~~internal ~~unit~~revenue ~~below its carrying amount~~investigation. ~~The~~On ~~Company believes that there has been no event as of~~ December 318, 2003, ~~that reduced~~ the ~~fair value of our reporting unit below the goodwill and intangible assets carrying amounts. The~~ Company ~~will~~filed ~~perform evaluations more frequently if business conditions indicate~~ an ~~assessment~~ inappeal anto ~~interim~~reverse ~~period~~that isportion ~~warranted.~~of ~~The Company will periodically review~~ the ~~estimated~~Nasdaq ~~remaining~~Panel’s ~~useful~~decision ~~lives~~relating ofto ~~other~~its ~~intangible~~public ~~assets~~interest concerns. AOn ~~reduction~~February in27, ~~estimate~~2004, ofthe ~~remaining~~Nasdaq ~~useful~~advised ~~lives~~the ~~could~~Company that ~~result~~its inappeal ~~increased~~had ~~amortization~~been ~~expense in future periods~~denied.

~~Reclassification~~Tarantella’s common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets. The Company’s trading symbol has changed to TTLA.PK. Now that the Company has regained compliance with the periodic reporting requirements of the 1934 Exchange Act, it will attempt to meet the listing requirements for the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, however some requirements such as minimum bid price and market capitalization are outside of the Company’s control.

~~Certain~~Management ~~prior~~Changes ~~period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications had no significant impact on the financial statements for the periods presented.~~

~~De-Listing~~On ~~Status~~December 11, 2003, the Company announced that the board of directors had appointed Francis E. Wilde as Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the board of directors. Mr. Wilde succeeds Douglas Michels, who continues with the Company as a strategic advisor. Mr. Michels will also continue as a director of Tarantella.

On ~~October~~January 206, ~~2003~~2004, the Company announced ~~that~~the itappointment ~~had~~of ~~received~~John ~~notification~~M. ~~from~~Greeley ~~the~~as ~~Nasdaq~~Chief ~~Listing~~Financial ~~Qualifications~~Officer, ~~Panel~~reporting ~~that~~directly ~~the~~to ~~Company’s~~Mr. ~~stock~~Wilde. ~~would~~Mr. ~~discontinue~~Greeley ~~trading~~assumed on the ~~Nasdaq~~CFO responsibilities ~~SmallCap~~from ~~Market~~Mr. ~~effective with~~Alok ~~the~~Mohan, ~~open~~who ofhad ~~business~~been onserving ~~Tuesday,~~as ~~October~~acting 21CFO since September 8, 2003.

~~This~~In ~~action~~December ~~followed Tarantella’s~~2003, ~~appeal~~Gregory toQuinn, ~~Nasdaq~~Stephen ~~for~~Bannerman aand ~~listing~~E. ~~extension~~Joseph ~~after~~Vitetta, ~~not~~Jr. ~~meeting~~joined the ~~stated~~Company ~~time~~as ~~requirements~~Vice toPresident ~~file~~North ~~SEC~~American ~~Form~~Operations ~~10-Q~~and ~~for~~Strategic ~~the~~Alliances, ~~Company’s~~Chief ~~third~~Marketing ~~fiscal~~Officer ~~quarter.~~and ~~The~~Vice ~~Nasdaq~~President Corporate ~~Panel~~Development, ~~determination~~respectively. toIn ~~delist~~January ~~the~~2004, ~~Company’s~~Mr. ~~stock~~Vitetta was ~~based on~~also ~~the~~appointed ~~Company’s~~Corporate ~~filing~~Secretary. ~~delinquency,~~Joseph ~~public~~Makoid ~~interest~~joined ~~concerns,~~the ~~and~~Company ~~the~~in ~~nature~~January of2004 ~~the~~as ~~ongoing~~Vice ~~internal~~President ~~revenue~~OEM ~~investigation~~Sales. OnMessrs. ~~December 8~~Quinn, ~~2003~~Bannerman, ~~the~~Vitetta ~~Company~~and ~~filed~~Makoid anall ~~appeal~~report directly to ~~reverse~~Mr. ~~that~~Wilde. ~~portion~~In ofJanuary ~~the~~2004, ~~Nasdaq~~Thomas ~~Panel’s~~P. ~~decision~~Rhodes ~~relating to~~joined ~~its~~the ~~public~~Company ~~interest~~as ~~concerns~~Vice President-General Counsel. OnMr. ~~February~~Rhodes ~~27,~~reported ~~2004,~~to ~~the~~Mr. ~~Nasdaq~~Greeley. ~~advised~~Mr. ~~the~~Rhodes ~~Company~~subsequently ~~that~~left ~~its~~the ~~appeal~~Company ~~had~~in ~~been~~July ~~denied~~2004.

Tarantella’s common stock is not currently eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board but is eligible for quotation on the OTC Pink Sheets. The Company’s trading symbol has changed to TTLA.PK. Regaining SEC compliance may allow the Company’s shares to be eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. If the Company resumes compliance with the periodic reporting requirements of the 1934 Exchange Act, it will attempt to meet the listing requirements for the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, however some requirements such as minimum bid price and market capitalization are outside of the Company’s control.

Results of Operations

~~Net~~The ~~Revenues~~Company’s net revenues are derived from software licenses and fees for software maintenance and services.

~~The~~Net ~~Company’s~~revenues ~~net~~for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by 30% to $2.6 million from $3.8 million in the same period in fiscal 2003. Net revenues ~~are~~for ~~derived~~the nine months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by 15% to $9.2 million from ~~software~~$10.9 ~~licenses~~million in the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in revenue performance year to date, broken out geographically, was a $1.1 million decrease in United States, a $0.3 million decrease in Europe and ~~fees~~a $0.6 million decrease in Asia. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in the Canada and Latin America region. The decrease in net revenues for ~~services~~the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 was mainly due to fewer licenses being sold caused primarily by several large customers’ deals being postponed in the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

~~Net~~License revenues for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~2004 ~~increased~~were ~~18% to~~ $31.56 million ~~from~~compared to $23.9 0 million in the same ~~period~~quarter inof fiscal 2003~~. The~~, ~~increase~~a indecrease ~~revenue~~of ~~performance,~~47% ~~broken~~from ~~out~~the ~~geographically,~~prior ~~was a $0~~year.3 ~~million~~License ~~increase~~revenues infor the ~~United~~nine ~~States,~~months ~~$0.3~~ended ~~million~~June ~~increase~~30, in2004 ~~Europe~~were ~~and~~ $06.21 million ~~increase~~compared into ~~Canada and Latin America~~$8.8 ~~The~~million ~~increase~~for inthe ~~these~~same ~~regions~~period ~~was~~of ~~partially offset~~fiscal by2003, a ~~$0.3~~decrease ~~million~~of ~~decrease~~31% infrom ~~Asia~~the prior ~~Pacific~~year. The ~~reason for the~~ decrease in ~~revenue~~revenues infor the ~~Asia~~three ~~Pacific~~and ~~region~~nine ~~was~~months ~~that~~ended ~~there~~June ~~was~~30, a2004 ~~prepaid~~is ~~royalty~~attributed ofto ~~$0.3~~the ~~for~~reduction ain ~~large~~the ~~customer~~number inof ~~Japan~~licenses insold ~~the~~caused ~~first~~primarily ~~quarter~~by ofseveral ~~fiscal~~large ~~2003~~customers’ ~~that~~deals ~~did~~being ~~not~~postponed ~~repeat~~ in the ~~first~~ quarter ofended ~~fiscal~~June 30, 2004. ~~The increase in net revenues was mainly due to increased service revenues.~~

~~License~~Service revenues increased to $1.1 million for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~2004, ~~were~~from $20.48 million in the same period in fiscal 2003, an increase of 39%. ~~This~~Service isrevenues ~~flat~~were ~~with~~40% of the total revenue for the third fiscal quarter of 2004, compared to 20% for the same period in the prior year. Service revenues increased to $3.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004, from $2.41 million in the same period in fiscal 2003, an increase of ~~license~~46%. Service revenues were 34% of the total revenue for the first nine months of 2004, compared to 20% for the same period in the prior year. The increase in service revenues for the three and nine months ended ~~December~~ 31June 30, ~~2002~~2004 is the result of an increased percentage of customers purchasing service contracts with new product purchases, as well as an increase in the number of contracts renewed.

~~Service~~International revenues ~~increased~~were to50% of ~~$1.1~~total ~~million~~revenues for the ~~three months~~third ~~ended~~quarter ~~December~~of ~~31,~~fiscal ~~2003,~~2004 ~~from~~and ~~$0.6~~57% ~~million~~for in the same period in ~~fiscal~~the ~~2003,~~prior ~~an increase of 89%~~year. ~~Service~~For ~~revenue was 32% of~~ the ~~total~~nine ~~revenue~~months ~~for~~ended ~~the~~June ~~first~~30, ~~fiscal~~2004, ~~quarter~~international ofrevenues ~~2004~~were 57%, compared to 2054% for the same period in the prior year. ~~The increase in service revenues was a result of increased maintenance revenue for the US government and a large professional services contract in Spain.~~

~~International~~Costs ~~revenues were 63% of total revenues for the first fiscal quarter of 2004~~ and ~~67%~~Expenses ~~for the same period in the prior year.~~

Cost of license revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased to $0.2 million from a credit of $14,000 in the same period of fiscal 2003. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, cost of license revenues increased by 374% to $0.6 million from $0.1 million in the same period of fiscal 2003. Cost of license revenues increased because of the cost of amortization for technology acquired from New Moon and Caststream. The amortization expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 was $.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared with $39,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003. There was also an adjustment to a previous estimated royalty accrual in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003, which reduced the cost of license expense by $0.1 million

~~For~~Cost of service revenues for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2004 increased by 42% to $0.4 million from $0.3 million in the same period of fiscal 2003,. ~~Clarity~~Cost ~~Technology,~~of service revenues for the ~~Company’s~~nine Umonths ended June 30, 2004 increased by 36% to $1.K2 million from $0.9 ~~distributor~~million in the same period of fiscal 2003. Cost of service revenues decreased as a percentage of service revenue, ~~accounted~~increasing ~~for~~service 16gross margin from 56% in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, to 59% in the ~~Company’s~~third ~~net~~quarter ~~revenues~~of fiscal 2004. ~~For~~Service gross margin increased to 63% for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2002~~2004, ~~Tomen~~from ~~Cyber~~56% ~~Business~~for ~~Corporation,~~the same period of fiscal 2003. The improvement in the ~~Company’s~~services ~~Japanese~~gross ~~distributor~~margin for the nine months ended June 30, ~~accounted~~2004 ~~for~~is ~~19%~~a result of ~~the~~higher ~~Company’s~~revenue ~~net~~partially ~~revenues~~offset by higher personnel costs.

~~Costs~~Total cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues increased to 25% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 from 8% for the same period in fiscal 2003. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues increased to 19% from 9% for the same period in fiscal 2003. Cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenue increased due primarily to the cost of amortization for technology acquired from New Moon and ~~Expenses~~Caststream, increased support costs, and decreased revenue. The first nine months of fiscal 2003 did not include any amortization for New Moon technology since the acquisition occurred during the third quarter of fiscal 2003.

~~Cost~~Research and development expenses increased 8% to $1.15 million in the third quarter of ~~license~~fiscal 2004 from $1.06 million in the comparable quarter of fiscal 2003, and as a percentage of net revenues were 44% and 28%, respectively. The increase in research and development expenses for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~2004 ~~were~~can be attributed higher consulting costs of $0.21 million, ~~compared~~increased tofacility costs of $0.1 million offset by a reduction of $0.1 million in salaries. For the ~~same~~nine ~~period~~months ofended June 30, 2004 research and development ~~fiscal~~expenses ~~2003~~increased 12% to $3.3 ~~The~~from ~~reason~~$3.0 ~~for~~million in the ~~increase~~comparable inperiod ~~cost~~of fiscal 2003, and as a percentage of ~~license~~net revenues were 36% and 27%, respectively. The increase in ~~fiscal~~research ~~2004~~and ~~was~~development ~~that~~expenses for the ~~first~~nine ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June 30, 2004 can ~~included~~be ~~amortization~~attributed ~~for~~primarily ~~technology~~to ~~acquired~~additional ~~from~~head ~~New~~count ~~Moon~~ in India, one-time start-up costs for the ~~amount~~Company’s ofnew ~~$118~~India development center,~~000.~~ ~~The~~increased ~~first~~contract ~~quarter~~labor costs related to development of ~~fiscal~~a ~~2003~~new ~~did not~~product ~~include~~and ~~any~~increased ~~amortization~~travel ~~for~~costs, ~~New~~partially offset ~~Moon~~by ~~technology~~lower ~~since~~labor ~~the~~costs ~~acquisition~~due ~~occurred~~to ~~during~~reductions ~~the~~in ~~third~~headcount ~~quarter~~in ofthe ~~fiscal~~UK ~~2003~~development center.

~~Cost~~Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 58% to $5.2 million in the third quarter of ~~service~~fiscal ~~revenues~~2004 from $3.3 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year. The increase in expenses for the three months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003~~2004 ~~were~~is due primarily to an increase in head count and consist of $1.0 million increase in personnel and contractor costs, $0.3 million increase in professional services of, ~~flat~~$0.3 ~~compared~~million increase in travel costs, $0.2 million increase in facility costs, and $0.1 million increase in marketing expenses. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 37% to $14.7 from $10.7 million in the ~~same~~comparable period inof fiscal 2003. ~~Although~~The increase ~~actual~~in ~~cost~~expenses offor ~~service revenues~~the ~~remained~~nine ~~flat~~months ended June 30, ~~they~~2004 ~~declined~~is asdue ato ~~percentage~~an increase of ~~service~~$1.7 million in professional fees of which $0.9 million was related to the internal revenue investigation, ~~increasing~~$0.6 ~~gross~~million ~~margin~~increase ~~from~~in ~~56%~~commission payments, payouts to terminated employees made under change in ~~the~~control ~~first~~agreements ~~quarter~~of $0.5 million, increased travel costs of ~~fiscal~~$0.4 ~~2003~~million, toincreased 70facility costs of $0.3 million, increased recruiting costs of $0.2 million, and increased stock compensation expense of $0.2 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 199% in the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2004. ~~The~~and ~~improvement~~88% in the ~~services~~same ~~gross~~period ~~margin~~in isfiscal a2003. ~~result~~For ofthe ~~a higher~~nine ~~percentage~~months ofended ~~the~~June ~~services~~30, ~~revenue~~2004, ~~from~~selling, ~~maintenance~~general ~~contracts.~~and administrative ~~Maintenance~~expenses ~~revenue~~were ~~has~~159% aof ~~higher~~net ~~margin~~revenues ~~than~~compared ~~professional~~to ~~services~~98% ~~revenue~~in ~~since~~the ~~there~~same isperiod ~~very~~of ~~little~~fiscal ~~labor involved~~2003.

~~Total~~There ~~cost~~was ~~of revenues as~~ a ~~percentage~~provision ofadjustment ~~net~~to ~~revenues~~the ~~increased~~restructuring toaccrual ~~14%~~of $26,000 in the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2004 ~~from~~because ~~11%~~the ~~for~~actual ~~the~~restructuring ~~same period~~charges inwere ~~fiscal~~lower ~~2003.~~than ~~Cost~~originally ofestimated. ~~revenues~~In asthe athird ~~percentage~~quarter of fiscal ~~net~~2003 ~~revenue~~there ~~were~~was ~~higher~~restructuring ~~because~~charge ~~cost~~ of ~~revenues~~$0.1 ~~for~~million. For the ~~first~~nine ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June 30, 2004 ~~included~~there ~~amortization~~was ~~for~~a ~~technology~~restructuring ~~acquired~~charge ~~from~~of ~~New~~$19,000, ~~Moon~~offset inby ~~the~~a ~~amount~~provision adjustment of $~~118~~34,000. ~~The~~For ~~first~~the ~~quarter of~~nine ~~fiscal~~months ~~2003~~ended ~~did~~June ~~not~~30, ~~include~~2003, ~~any~~restructuring charges ~~amortization~~were ~~for~~$1.3 ~~New~~million ~~Moon~~for ~~technology~~a ~~since~~restructuring ~~the~~plan ~~acquisition~~that ~~occurred~~was ~~during~~initiated in the first and third quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company cannot assure that its current estimates of costs associated with these restructuring actions will not change during the implementation period.

~~Research~~Interest ~~and~~income ~~development~~was ~~expenses~~$34,000 ~~were~~for ~~basically~~the ~~flat~~third atquarter of fiscal 2004 and $~~1.0~~5,000 ~~million~~for the same period in fiscal 2003. For the ~~first~~nine ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June 30, 2004, interest income was $47,000 compared towith $152,000 for the same period in fiscal 2003.0 ~~million~~The increase in interest income for the ~~comparable~~three ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June ~~2003~~30, ~~and~~2004, asreflects athe ~~percentage~~higher ofaverage ~~net~~cash ~~revenues~~balances ~~were~~held ~~28%~~for ~~and~~the ~~34%, respectively~~quarter. The decrease in ~~research~~interest ~~and~~income ~~development~~for asthe anine ~~percentage~~months ofended ~~net~~June ~~revenues~~30, is2004, reflects lower average cash balances held for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. Interest income was also lower due to ~~increased~~a ~~revenues~~lower average interest rate for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2003.

~~Selling,~~Interest ~~general~~expense ~~and~~was ~~administrative expenses increased 25% to~~ $~~4.6~~9,000 ~~million~~for in the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2004 ~~from~~and $~~3.7~~1,000 ~~million~~ for the ~~comparable~~ ~~quarter~~same ofperiod ~~the prior year. The significant increase~~ in ~~expenses is due to increased legal and audit fees, which resulted from the revenue investigation. The Company incurred expenses of $0.9 million in the first quarter of~~ fiscal ~~2004 for the revenue investigation and the subsequent audit~~2003. ~~Over~~For the ~~past~~nine ~~three~~months ~~quarters~~ended ~~the~~June ~~Company~~30, ~~has~~2004, ~~spent~~interest aexpense was ~~total of~~ $~~1.5~~27,000 ~~million~~as oncompared ~~the revenue investigation and the subsequent audit. There was also an increase due~~ to ~~severance costs of~~ $~~0.3 million~~2, 000 for ~~one employee, paid in accordance with~~ the ~~Company’s~~same ~~change~~period in ~~control agreement, which was triggered by the private placement that was completed during the first quarter of~~ fiscal ~~2004. For more information on the Company’s change in control agreements see Item 11 and Exhibit 10.35 in the Company’s~~ 2003 ~~Annual Report on Form 10-K~~. The increase in ~~audit~~interest ~~and~~expense ~~legal~~for ~~fees~~the three and ~~severance~~nine ~~costs~~months ~~was~~ended ~~partially~~June ~~offset~~30, by2004 ~~lower~~is ~~labor costs of $0.7 million. The lower labor costs were~~ due to ainterest ~~headcount~~being ~~reduction~~accrued ~~from~~for 77deferred ~~employees~~rent ~~down~~payments ~~to 64. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 132%~~ in the ~~first~~amount ~~quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~$9,000 ~~2004~~per ~~and 124% in the same period in fiscal 2003~~quarter.

Restructuring charges for the three months ended December 31, 2003 were $19,000, compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002. The Company has substantially completed these plans as of December 31, 2003. See Note 5 for more details on restructuring charges.

Interest expense, net was $7,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to interest income, net of $32,000 for the same period in fiscal 2003. The decrease in interest income is due to lower interest-earning balance and greater interest bearing obligations in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

Other expense, net was $50,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to $14,000 for the same period of fiscal 2003. The increase in other expense primarily relates to greater foreign exchange translation differences.

Income tax expense was $98,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $60,000 for the same period in fiscal year 2003. The tax provisions for the first quarters of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 reflect foreign taxes.

Net loss for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 was $2.8 million compared to net loss of $3.2 million for the same quarter of fiscal 2003. The decrease in net loss is primarily due to higher revenues and lower operating expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has financed its operations through cash flow from operations, private offerings of the Company’s common stock and bank borrowings. As of December 31, 2003, the Company’s principal source of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $3.9 million, representing 30% of total assets and an available bank line of credit under which the Company had no outstanding borrowings.

~~The~~Gain ~~credit~~on ~~agreement~~sale ~~provides~~of ~~that~~investments ~~the~~was ~~Company~~$0.7 ~~may~~million ~~borrow~~for upthe tothree ~~$1.5~~and ~~million~~nine atmonths ~~2.5%~~ended ~~per~~June ~~month~~30, ~~based~~2004 oncompared ~~75%~~to ofnone ~~eligible~~for the ~~accounts~~same ~~receivable.~~period ~~The line~~ of ~~credit~~fiscal ~~has~~2003. noDuring ~~financial~~the ~~covenants~~third ~~and~~quarter isof ~~secured~~fiscal by2004, the ~~assets~~Company sold 505,767 shares of ~~the~~Rainmaker ~~Company~~stock. The ~~increase~~Company inaccounted ~~cash~~for ~~and~~this ~~short-term~~investment ~~investments~~as ofavailable-for-sale, ~~$0.7~~and ~~million~~accordingly, inrecorded ~~the~~it ~~first~~at ~~quarter~~fair ofmarket ~~fiscal~~value ~~2004~~based ison quoted ~~due~~market toprices. ~~the~~The ~~completion~~Company ofreceived acash ~~private placement~~ of ~~common~~$0.9 ~~stock~~million and ~~warrants~~recorded ~~which~~a ~~resulted~~gain inon ~~net~~investments ~~proceeds to the Company~~ of ~~approximately~~ $20.57 million. The ~~increase~~cost inof ~~cash~~the ~~due~~investment towas ~~proceeds~~$0.2 ~~from~~million. ~~the~~The ~~private~~Company ~~placement~~no ~~was~~longer ~~partially~~holds ~~offset~~any byshares ~~cash~~of ~~used~~Rainmaker ~~for~~stock. ~~operating~~The ~~activities~~Company ofdid ~~$1.5~~not record ~~million~~any ~~and~~gains aor ~~reduction~~losses inon ~~borrowings~~investments onduring the ~~line~~nine ofmonths ~~credit~~ended ofJune ~~$0.3~~30, ~~million~~2003.

~~The~~Impairment ~~Company’s operating activities used cash~~ of ~~$1.5~~investments ~~million~~was ~~during the first quarter of fiscal 2004~~$151,000 ~~compared to $2.2 million used~~ for ~~operating~~the ~~activities~~three inand ~~the~~nine ~~first~~months ~~quarter~~ended ofJune ~~fiscal~~30, 2003. ~~The~~There ~~decrease~~was inno ~~the~~investment ~~cash~~impairments ~~used~~during ~~for operating activities is due to a $0.6 million decrease in operating loss from~~ the ~~first~~nine ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~fiscal~~June ~~2003~~30, ~~to the first quarter of fiscal~~ 2004. The ~~operating~~investment ~~loss~~impairment, which was ~~$2.6~~made ~~million~~ in the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~fiscal 2004 compared to $3.2 million in~~ ~~the first quarter of~~ fiscal 2003~~. Cash used in investing activities was $12~~,~~000~~ ~~in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $127,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Cash provided by financing activities~~ was ~~$2.2~~a ~~million~~write-down ~~in the first quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~an ~~2004~~investment ~~compared with cash used~~ in ~~financing~~a ~~activities~~private ofcompany ~~$2,000~~to ~~for~~reflect ~~the~~a ~~same~~decline ~~quarter of fiscal 2003. Cash provided by financing activities~~ in ~~the~~stock ~~first~~price ~~quarter of fiscal 2004 includes proceeds~~ from athe ~~private~~last ~~placement~~stock ofoffering ~~$2.5~~to ~~million, partially offset by a reduction of borrowing on~~ the ~~line~~then ofmost ~~credit~~recent ofstock $0offering.3 ~~million.~~

~~The~~Other ~~Company’s~~expense, ~~days~~net ~~sales~~was ~~outstanding~~$18,000 ~~(DSO)~~in atthe ~~December~~third 31quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to other income, net of $33,000 for the same period of fiscal 2003. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, other expense, net was 75$129,000 ancompared ~~increase~~to other income, net of 8$82,000 ~~days~~for ~~from~~the 67same ~~days~~period atin ~~December~~fiscal 312003. The other expense, ~~2002~~net for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 was mainly for foreign exchange losses of $9,000 and bank charges of $8,000. ~~DSO~~The ~~increased~~other ~~because~~income, net for the ~~accounts~~third ~~receivable~~quarter ~~over~~of 60fiscal ~~days~~2003 ~~increased~~was ~~from~~mainly gain on foreign exchange of $1244,000, topartially offset by bank charges of $~~220~~16,000.

OnIncome ~~December~~tax 26provision was $44,000 ~~2003~~for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to $122,000 for the ~~Company~~same ~~completed~~period ain ~~private~~fiscal ~~placement~~2003. ofFor ~~common~~the ~~stock~~nine months ended June 30, 2004 and ~~warrants~~ to2003 the ~~following~~income ~~investors:~~tax ~~Special~~provision ~~Situations~~was ~~Technology~~$0.2 ~~Funds,~~million ~~Starlight~~and ~~Digital~~$0.3 ~~Technologies~~million, ~~LLC,~~respectively. anThe ~~investment~~tax ~~group~~provision infor ~~which~~the ~~Mr.~~three ~~Wilde~~and ~~acts~~nine asmonths ~~Managing~~ended ~~Director~~June 30, 2004 and an2003, ~~additional~~reflects foreign ~~private~~taxes ~~investor,~~payable. ~~resulting~~The inlower ~~gross~~expense ~~proceeds~~for to the ~~Company~~ ofthree ~~approximately~~and $2nine months ended June 30,~~750,000.~~ In2004 ~~connection~~is ~~with~~due to the ~~financing,~~lower expected tax liabilities for the Company’s ~~paid~~European ~~placement~~branches ~~fees~~as incompared to the ~~amount~~previous offiscal ~~$232,303~~year.

~~Subsequent~~Net toloss ~~the~~for ~~end of~~ the ~~first~~third quarter of fiscal 2004, ~~the~~was ~~Company~~$3.7 ~~announced~~million ~~the~~compared ~~completion~~to ofnet aloss ~~private placement~~ of ~~common stock and warrants to various investors~~$1.2 Inmillion ~~the~~for ~~private placement, which closed on February 23, 2004,~~ the ~~investors~~same ~~purchased~~quarter ~~11,678,580 shares~~ of ~~Tarantella~~fiscal ~~common stock at a price of $1~~2003.40 ~~per~~For ~~share~~the ~~for~~nine ~~gross~~months ~~proceeds~~ended ofJune ~~$16~~30,~~350,000.~~ ~~The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2~~2004,~~335,714~~ ~~shares~~net atloss anwas ~~exercise price of~~ $110.701 ~~per~~million ~~share.~~compared ~~The~~to ~~warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately~~ $~~3,970,714~~5.3 ~~The~~million ~~Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants~~ for ~~resale once~~ the ~~Company~~same ~~has~~period ~~complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act~~ of ~~1934,~~ asfiscal ~~amended~~2003. InThe ~~connection~~increase ~~with the financing, the Company will pay fees~~ in ~~the~~net ~~amount~~loss ofis ~~$1,074,000~~primarily ~~and~~due ~~issue warrants~~ to ~~purchase~~lower ~~142,500~~revenues ~~shares at $1.54 per share~~ and ~~180,000~~higher costs ~~shares at $1.70 per share. The warrants have lives of three~~ and ~~five~~ ~~years, respectively~~expenses.

~~The~~25 Company has capital lease commitments of $32,000 in fiscal 2004. There are no capital lease commitments beyond fiscal 2004. The Company has operating lease commitments of $1.3 million in fiscal 2004. The Company’s various operating lease commitments extend to 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has financed its operations through private offerings of the Company’s common stock and bank borrowings. As of June 30, 2004, the Company’s principal source of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $13.5 million, representing 66% of total assets. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company closed its available bank line of credit under which the Company had no outstanding borrowings. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of $10.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 is due primarily to the completion of two private placements of common stock and warrants which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $17.8 million, net proceeds from issuance of common stock from stock option and purchase plans of $.2 million and, the sale of 505,767 shares of Rainmaker stock which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $0.9 million. The increase in cash from the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock and sale of Rainmaker stock was partially offset by cash used for operating activities of $7.6 million, the purchase of property and equipment of $0.6 million, and the pay down on the line of credit of $0.3 million.

The Company’s operating activities used cash of $7.6 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2004, compared to $5.5 million used for operating activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. The increase in the cash used for operating activities is due primarily to the net loss offset by an increase in deferred revenues. Cash used in investing activities was $284,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared to cash provided of $3.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. Cash provided by financing activities was $17.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared with cash used of $81,000 for the same nine months of fiscal 2003. Cash provided by financing activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 includes proceeds from two private placements of $17.8 million, net of expenses, partially offset by a pay down on the line of credit of $0.3 million.

The Company’s days sales outstanding (“DSO”) at June 30, 2004 was 57, a decrease of 18 days from 75 days at June 30, 2003. DSO decreased because the past due accounts receivable have decreased from $1.1 million to $0.4 million due to improved accounts receivable collections and lower revenue levels for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as compared to the quarter ending June 30, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, 79% of the accounts receivable were current compared with 73% at June 30, 2003.

On December 26, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants to the following investors: Special Situations Technology Funds, Starlight Technology Partners LLC, an investment group in which Mr. Wilde acts as Managing Director, and an additional private investor, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,750,000. In connection with the financing, the Company paid placement fees in the amount of $91,250.

On February 23, 2004, the Company announced the completion of a second private placement of common stock and warrants to various investors. In the private placement, the investors purchased 11,678,580 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.40 per share for gross proceeds of $16,350,000. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,335,714 shares at an exercise price of $1.70 per share. The warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $3,970,714. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In connection with the financing, the Company incurred fees in the amount of $1,198,000, which included placement agent fees, legal and accounting fees, and issued warrants to purchase 322,500 shares at $1.70 per share. The warrants have lives of five years.

The Company has paid in full its capital lease obligation in November 2003 and has no commitments as of June 30, 2004. At June 30, 2004, the Company has operating lease commitments of $0.4 million for the remainder of fiscal 2004 and $1.6 million, $0.4 million, and $0.3 million for fiscal 2005, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 respectively.

The Company’s management believes that, based on the Company’s current plans, its existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash received from private placements and funds generated from operations will be sufficient to meet its operating requirements for the next twelve months.

Factors that may affect future results

Set forth below and elsewhere in this filing and in other documents the Company files with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements in this filing.

The Company’s operating results may fluctuate in future periods.

The results of operations for any quarter or fiscal year are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future periods. The Company’s operating results have in the past been, and will continue to be, subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations as a result of a number of factors, including but not limited to:

• ~~Overall~~overall technology spending;

• ~~Changes~~changes in general economic conditions and specific market conditions in the ~~Internet~~internet infrastructure industry;

• ~~Rapid~~rapid technological changes that can adversely affect the demand for the Company’s products;

• ~~Fluctuations~~fluctuations in demand for the Company’s products and services;

• ~~The~~the public’s perception of the Company and its products;

25• the long sales and implementation cycle for the Company’s products;

•

general industry trends and the potential effects of price and product competition in the internet infrastructure industry;

•

the introduction and acceptance of new technologies and products;

•

reductions in sales to, or loss of, significant customers;

•

the timing of orders, timing of shipments, and the ability to satisfy all contractual obligations in customer contracts;

•

the impact of acquired technologies and businesses;

•

the Company’s ability to control spending and achieve targeted cost reductions;

•

the ability of the Company to generate cash adequate to continue operations;

•

the potential loss of key employees;

•

the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;

•

adverse changes in the value of equity investments in third parties held by the Company; and

•

the ability of the Company’s customers and suppliers to obtain financing or to fund capital expenditures.

As a consequence, operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict. The Company participates in a highly dynamic industry and future results could be subject to significant volatility, particularly on a quarterly basis. The Company’s revenues and operating results may be unpredictable due to the Company’s shipment patterns. The Company operates with little backlog of orders because its products are generally shipped as orders are received. In general, a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues have been booked and shipped in the third month of the quarter, with a concentration of these revenues in the latter half of that third month. In addition, the timing of closing of large license contracts and the release of new products and product upgrades increase the risk of quarter to quarter fluctuations and the uncertainty of quarterly operating results. The Company’s staffing and operating expense levels are based on an operating plan and are relatively fixed throughout the quarter. As a result, if revenues are not realized in the quarter as expected, the Company’s expected operating results and cash balances could be adversely affected, and such effect could be substantial and could result in an operating loss and depletion of the Company’s cash balances.

• The long sales and implementation cycle for the Company’s products

• General industry trends and the potential effects of price and product competition in the Internet infrastructure industry

• The introduction and acceptance of new technologies and products

• Reductions in sales to, or loss of, significant customers

• The timing of orders, timing of shipments, and the ability to satisfy all contractual obligations in customer contracts

• The impact of acquired technologies and businesses

• The Company’s ability to control spending and achieve targeted cost reductions

• The ability of the Company to generate cash adequate to continue operations

• The potential loss of key employees

• The Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel

• Adverse changes in the value of equity investments in third parties held by the Company

• The ability of the Company’s customers and suppliers to obtain financing or to fund capital expenditures

As a consequence, operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict.

The Company is exposed to general economic and market conditions.

Any significant downturn in the Company’s customers’ markets, or domestic and global conditions, which result in a decline in demand for their software and services, could harm the Company’s business. The state of the economy has had a negative impact on the software industry. This could result in customers continuing to delay or cancel orders for software. Any of these occurrences could have a significant impact on the Company’s operating results, revenues and costs and may cause the market price of the Company’s common stock to decline or become more volatile.

The Company’s future operating results may be affected by various uncertain trends and factors that are beyond the Company’s control. These include adverse changes in general economic conditions and rapid or unexpected changes in the technologies affecting the Company’s products. The process of developing new high technology products is complex and uncertain and requires accurate anticipation of customer needs and technological trends.

The Company depends on the development and acceptance of new products in a rapidly changing market.

The market for the Company’s products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolution of new industry standards, and frequent introductions of new products and product enhancements. The Company’s success will depend upon its continued ability to enhance its existing products, to introduce new products on a timely and cost-effective basis to meet evolving customer requirements, to achieve market acceptance for new product offerings, and to respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in developing new products or enhancing its existing products or that such new or enhanced products will receive market acceptance. The Company’s success also depends upon its ability to license from third parties and to incorporate into its products new technologies that become industry standards. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to obtain such licenses on favorable terms or that it will successfully incorporate such third-party technologies into its own products.

The Company anticipates new releases of products in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004. There can be no assurance that such new releases will not be affected by technical problems or “bugs”, as is common in the software industry. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that these or other future product introductions will not be delayed. Delays in the availability, or a lack of market acceptance, of new or enhanced products could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business. There can be no assurance that product introductions in the future will not disrupt product revenues and adversely affect operating results.

The Company competes in the highly competitive Internet infrastructure market.

The industry has become increasingly competitive and, accordingly, the Company’s results may also be adversely affected by the actions of existing or future competitors, including the development of new technologies, the introduction of new products, and the reduction of prices by such competitors to gain or retain market share. The Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected if it were required to lower its prices significantly.

Operating results for a particular quarter are difficult to predict.

The Company participates in a highly dynamic industry and future results could be subject to significant volatility, particularly on a quarterly basis. The Company’s revenues and operating results may be unpredictable due to the Company’s shipment patterns. The Company operates with little backlog of orders because its products are generally shipped as orders are received. In general, a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues have been booked and shipped in the third month of the quarter, with a concentration of

these revenues in the latter half of that third month. In addition, the timing of closing of large license contracts and the release of new products and product upgrades increase the risk of quarter to quarter fluctuations and the uncertainty of quarterly operating results. The Company’s staffing and operating expense levels are based on an operating plan and are relatively fixed throughout the quarter. As a result, if revenues are not realized in the quarter as expected, the Company’s expected operating results and cash balances could be adversely affected, and such effect could be substantial and could result in an operating loss and depletion of the Company’s cash balances.

It may be difficult to raise needed capital in the future.

Although the Company’s current business plan does not foresee the need for further financing activities to fund the Company’s operations for the foreseeable future, due to risks and uncertainties in the market place, the Company may need to raise additional capital. The Company may raise additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. The Company cannot be certain that the funding, if needed, will be available on attractive terms, or at all. Furthermore, any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Strategic arrangements, if necessary to raise additional funds, may require the Company to relinquish its rights to certain of its technologies or products. If the Company fails to raise capital when needed, the business will be negatively affected, which could cause the stock price to decline.

The Company’s revenues may be affected by the seasonality of revenues in the European and government markets.

The Company experiences seasonality of revenues for both the European and the U.S. federal government markets. European revenues during the quarter ending June 30 are historically lower or relatively flat compared to the prior quarter. This reflects a reduction of customer purchases in anticipation of reduced selling activity during the summer months. Sales to the U.S. federal government generally increase during the quarter ending September 30. This seasonal increase is primarily attributable to increased purchasing activity by the U.S. federal government prior to the close of its fiscal year. Additionally, net revenues for the first quarter of the fiscal year are typically lower or relatively flat compared to net revenues of the prior quarter.

Cost of revenues may be affected by changes in the mix of products and services.

The overall cost of revenues may be affected by changes in the mix of net revenue contribution between licenses and services, geographical regions and channels of distribution, as the costs associated with these revenues may have substantially different characteristics. The Company may also experience a change in margin as net revenues increase or decrease since technology costs and services costs are fixed within certain volume ranges.

The Company’s operational results could be affected by price variations.

The Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected if it were to lower its prices significantly. In the event the Company reduced its prices, the Company’s standard terms for selected distributors would be to provide credit for inventory ordered in the previous 180 days, such credits to be applied against future purchases. The Company, as a matter of policy, does not allow product returns for a refund, unless the product is covered under the 90 day warranty period, the product is non-conformant and the Company cannot repair or replace the product. Product returns are generally allowances for stock balancing and are accompanied by compensating and offsetting orders. Revenues are net of a provision for estimated future stock balancing and excess quantities above levels the Company believes are appropriate in its distribution channels. The Company monitors the quantity and mix of its product sales.

If the Company fails to manage the distribution of its products and services properly, or if the Company’s distributors’ financial condition or operations weaken, the Company’s revenue could suffer.

The Company markets products directly and through resellers and distributors. Since direct sales may compete with the sales made by resellers and distributors, these resellers and distributors may elect to use other suppliers that do not directly sell their own products. Any increase in our commitment to direct sales could cause conflict with some of our channel partners. Further, some of the Company’s resellers and distributors may have insufficient financial resources and may not be able to withstand changes in business conditions, including economic weakness and industry consolidation. Revenue from indirect sales could suffer if the Company’s distributors’ and resellers’ financial condition weakens.

The Company is dependent upon information received from third parties in order to determine reserves for product returns.

The Company depends on information received from ~~external~~its ~~sources~~distribution partners in evaluating the inventory levels at distribution partners in the determination of reserves for the return of materials not sold, stock rotation and price protection. Significant effort has gone into developing systems and procedures for determining the appropriate reserve level. In the event information is not received timely or accurately, the Company’s ability to monitor the inventory levels will be affected and may negatively impact the Company’s business.

The Company’s business depends upon its proprietary rights and there is a risk that such rights will be infringed.

The Company attempts to protect its software with a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret ~~laws~~protection, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements, license agreements, and other methods of protection. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of the Company’s products or reverse engineer or obtain and use information the Company regards as proprietary. While the Company’s competitive position may be affected by its ability to protect its intellectual property rights, the Company believes that trademark and copyright protections are less significant to the Company’s success than other factors, such as the knowledge, ability, and experience of the Company’s personnel, name recognition, and ongoing product development and support. Further, certain provisions of the Company’s licenses, including provisions protecting against unauthorized use, copying, transfer, and disclosure of the licensed product, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company’s intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S.

Risks of claims from third parties for intellectual property infringement could adversely affect the business.

As the number of software products in the industry increases and the functionality of these products further overlaps, the Company believes that software products will increasingly become subject to infringement claims. There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against the Company and/or against the Company’s suppliers of technology. In general, the Company’s suppliers have agreed to indemnify the Company in the event any such claim involves supplier-provided software or technology, but any such claim, whether or not involving a supplier, could require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation.

The Company’s business may be adversely affected by events outside the Company’s control.

While the Company has not been the target of software viruses specifically designed to impede the performance of the Company’s products, such viruses could be created and deployed against the Company’s products in the future. Similarly, experienced computer programmers or hackers could attempt to penetrate the Company’s network security or the security of the Company’s web sites. A hacker who penetrates the Company’s network or web sites could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions of services. The Company might be required to expend significant capital and resources to protect against, or to alleviate, problems caused by virus creators and/or hackers. In addition, war, power shortage, natural disasters, acts of terror, and regional and global health risks could impact the Company’s ability to conduct business in certain regions. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The Company’s results of operations may be affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Although the Company’s revenues are predominantly in U.S. dollars, substantial portions of the Company’s revenues are derived from sales to customers outside the United States. Trade sales to international customers represented 53%, 44% and 52% of total revenues for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. The Company’s revenues can be affected by general economic conditions in the United States, Europe and other international markets. Also, portions of the Company’s operating expenses are transacted in foreign currencies. The Company’s operating strategy and pricing take into account changes in exchange rates over time. However, the Company’s results of operations may be significantly affected in the short term by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

The Company’s results of operations may be affected by the assessment of additional taxes.

Tarantella has operations in many countries other than the United States. Transfer prices for services provided between the United States and these countries have been documented as reasonable, however, tax authorities could challenge these transfer prices and assess additional taxes on prior period transactions. Any such assessment could require the Company to record an additional tax provision in its statement of operations.

~~The~~Any ~~Company’s~~inability ~~success~~to ~~largely~~hire, ~~depends~~retain ~~upon~~or ~~its~~integrate ~~ability~~key topersonnel ~~retain~~will ~~and~~impact ~~recruit~~our ~~key~~business ~~personnel.~~

The Company’s ~~continued~~relies ~~success~~heavily ~~depends~~on tothe acontributions ~~significant~~of ~~extent~~its on senior management and other key management ~~employees.~~and ~~None~~technical ~~of these individuals is subject to a long-term employment contract or a non-competition agreement~~personnel. The ~~Company~~competition ~~has~~for ~~historically~~such ~~used~~employees ~~stock~~is ~~options~~extremely ~~and~~intense, ~~other~~particularly ~~forms~~in ofthe ~~equity~~technology-~~related~~centric ~~compensation~~regions aswhere awe ~~key~~operate. ~~component~~The toCompany ~~its employee~~may ~~compensation~~not ~~program~~be inable ~~order~~ to ~~align employees’ interests with the interests of shareholders~~hire, ~~encourage~~retain ~~employee retention,~~ and ~~provide~~integrate ~~competitive~~such ~~compensation~~key ~~packages~~personnel. InThe ~~recent~~loss ~~periods,~~of any aindividual ~~majority~~member of the Company’s ~~employee stock~~management ~~options~~team ~~have~~or ~~had~~other ~~exercise~~key ~~prices~~employees inmay ~~excess~~create ofdisruptions ~~the~~in ~~Company’s~~its ~~stock~~business. ~~price~~In fact, ~~which~~most ~~could~~of ~~affect~~ the Company’s ~~ability~~senior tomanagement ~~retain or attract present and prospective employees. In addition~~team, ~~the~~including ~~Financial~~

28• Francis E. Wilde, its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and a Director,

~~Table~~• ofJohn ~~Contents~~M. Greeley, its Chief Financial Officer,

~~Accounting~~• ~~Standards~~Gregory ~~Board and other agencies have proposed~~Quinn, ~~and~~its ~~are~~Vice ~~currently~~President ~~considering,~~North ~~changes~~American toOperations ~~United States generally accepted accounting principles that would require the Company~~ and ~~other~~Strategic companies to record a charge to earnings for employee stock option grants and other equity incentives. These and other developments in the provision of equity compensation to employees could make it more difficult to attractAlliances, retain and motivate employees and result in additional expense to the Company. The loss of one or more key employees or the Company’s inability to attract and retain other key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

•

Stephen Bannerman, its Chief Marketing Officer,

•

E. Joseph Vitetta, Jr., its Vice President Corporate Development, and

•

Joseph Makoid, its Vice President OEM Sales,

joined the Company recently between December 2003 and January 2004. The Company’s ability to integrate and retain these members of its management team and other employees it hires is crucial to its success. If the Company fails to do so or if it experiences further changes in its management team, its business may be adversely affected.

Furthermore, the Company has historically used stock options and other forms of equity-related compensation as a key component to its employee compensation program in order to align employees’ interests with the interests of shareholders, encourage employee retention, and provide competitive compensation packages. In recent periods, a majority of the Company’s employee stock options have had exercise prices in excess of its stock price, which may affect its ability to retain or attract present and prospective employees. In addition, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and other agencies have proposed, and are currently considering, changes to United States generally accepted accounting principles that would require the Company and other companies to record a charge to earnings for employee stock option grants and other equity incentives. These and other developments in the provision of equity compensation to employees could make it more difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees and result in additional expenses to the Company.

The Company may never achieve profitability in the future.

Following the ~~Company’s~~ divestiture of its server software and professional services divisions in May 2001, the Company has not achieved profitability, and may never generate sufficient revenues to achieve profitability. As of June 30, 2004 the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $134,960,000. Many of the Company’s operating expenses are relatively fixed in nature, particularly in the short term, and it expects to continue to incur significant operating expenses in connection with the expansion of its sales and marketing efforts. The Company also expects to incur noncash charges relating to amortization of intangibles related to past acquisitions. The Company must therefore generate revenues sufficient to offset these increased expenses in order for it to become profitable. The Company cannot guarantee that it will successfully generate sufficient revenues or that it will ever achieve profitability. If it does achieve profitability, it may not be able to sustain it.

The outcome of SEC inquiry is uncertain.

The Company ishas been in contact with the Securities and Exchange Commission inregarding ~~connection with~~ an informal inquiry related to the ~~events~~Company’s restatement ~~leading~~of upfinancial tostatements for fiscal year 2002 and the ~~Company’s~~first ~~restatement~~two quarters of fiscal year 2003. ~~The~~At this time, the Company ~~cannot~~has ~~predict~~no information that the ~~outcome~~Securities ofand ~~this~~Exchange Commission intends to take any action with respect to the issues related to the inquiry.

If the Company is unable to effectively integrate and develop the operations of ~~New~~its ~~Moon~~recent ~~Systems~~acquisitions, ~~Inc.~~its ~~(“New Moon”), the~~ business may suffer.

The Company acquired New Moon Systems, Inc. in June 2003, and Caststream Inc. in March 2004. The Company ~~intends~~is toin ~~integrate~~the process of integrating the operations, certain employees, products and technology of both New Moon and Caststream into its ~~own~~ business, and it faces various risks as a result of this acquisition including, but not limited to:

• The ability to retain and motivate certain of New Moon’s and Caststream employees;

• The ability to retain and develop New Moon’s and Caststream customers;

• The failure to integrate the technology, operations and certain members of the workforce of New Moon ~~with~~and ~~the~~Caststream ~~Tarantella~~with its business;

• The failure to realize the potential financial or strategic benefits of the ~~acquisition~~acquisitions;

•

The incurrence of substantial unanticipated integration costs;

• The diversion of significant management attention and financial resources in assimilating New Moon’s business;

•

The disruption of the Company’s ongoing business.

If the Company is not able to successfully integrate and develop the businesses of New Moon’s ~~business~~and Caststream, ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ business may be negatively affected in future periods, ~~which~~ which may cause ~~the~~its stock price to decline. In addition, if the value of intangible assets and goodwill acquired becomes impaired, the Company will be required to write down the value of the assets, which would negatively affect ~~financial~~its financial results. The Company may incur liabilities from New Moon or Caststream including liabilities for IP infringement or indemnification of New Moon’s or Caststream’s customers for similar claims, which could materially and adversely affect ~~the~~ its business.

The Company may make future acquisitions that may result in additional risks.

The Company may continue to make investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. If the Company buys a company or a division of a company, ~~they~~the Company may experience difficulty integrating that company or division’s personnel and operations, which could negatively affect operating results. In addition:

•

Key personnel of the acquired company may decide not to accept employment with the Company;

•

The ongoing business may be disrupted or receive insufficient management attention;

•

The Company may not be able to recognize the anticipated cost savings or other financial benefits;

In connection with future acquisitions, the Company may be required to assume the liabilities of the acquired companies. By assuming the liabilities, the Company may incur liabilities, including liabilities for IP infringement or indemnification of customers of acquired businesses for similar claims, which could materially and adversely affect the business. The Company may have to incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisition, the issuance of which may involve restrictive covenants or be dilutive to existing shareholders.

~~The~~31 Company’s stock is subject to substantial price and volume fluctuations due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control, and those fluctuations may prevent shareholders from reselling their common stock at a profit.

The stock market in general, and the market for shares of technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Strategic factors such as new product introductions, acquisitions or restructurings by the Company or its competitors may have a significant impact on the market price of the Company’s common stock. Furthermore, quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in operating results may have a significant impact on the market price of the stock. These conditions, as well as factors that generally affect the market for stocks of high technology companies, could cause the price of the Company’s stock to fluctuate substantially over short periods.

The Company’s stock is subject to substantial price and volume fluctuations due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control, and those fluctuations may prevent shareholders from reselling their common stock at a profit.

The stock market in general, and the market for shares of technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Strategic factors such as new product introductions, and acquisitions or restructurings by the Company or its competitors may have a significant impact on the market price of the Company’s common stock. Furthermore, quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in operating results may have a significant impact on the market price of the stock. These conditions, as well as factors that generally affect the market for stocks of high technology companies, could cause the price of the Company’s stock to fluctuate substantially over short periods.

The Company’s common stock may be difficult to trade.

The Company’s stock was de-listed byfrom the Nasdaq SmallCap on October 21, 2003, and is now quoted on the Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Pink Sheets. Trading the Company’s stock may be more difficult due to the limited trading activity on the OTC market. This could cause a further decline in the Company’s stock price. Declines in the market price of the Company’s stock could greatly impair the Company’s ability to raise capital through equity or debt financing.

~~Former~~The ~~New~~Company ~~Moon~~registered ~~shareholders~~24,085,891 ~~will~~shares ~~have~~of ~~the~~our ~~ability~~common tostock ~~sell~~on a ~~large~~registration ~~number~~statement ofon Form S-1, which was declared effective by the SEC on August 13, 2004. Those shares ofare ~~Tarantella~~eligible ~~common~~for ~~stock~~sale on the open market, which may cause the trading price of the Company’s common stock to fluctuate or decline.

InThe ~~connection~~Company ~~with~~has ~~the~~registered ~~acquisition~~for ofsale ~~New~~on ~~Moon, the~~Form ~~Company~~S-1 ~~issued~~up ~~approximately~~to 124,~~592~~085,~~000~~891 shares ~~(calculated after the 1-for-5 reverse stock split which was implemented on June 6, 2003)~~ of ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ common stock toand ~~former New Moon shareholders. During the one year period following the closing of the acquisition, the aggregate number of~~ shares of common stock ~~sold~~issuable inupon ~~any~~exercise ~~calendar quarter by each~~ of ~~the~~warrants ~~former~~held ~~New~~by ~~Moon~~investors, shareholders ~~shall not exceed 25%~~ of ~~the~~acquired ~~aggregate~~companies, ~~number~~its ofexecutive ~~shares~~officers ~~of common stock issued to such former New Moon~~and ~~shareholders~~directors ~~pursuant~~and tocertain ~~the~~other ~~acquisition;~~parties. ~~provided,~~While ~~however,~~certain ~~that~~of the ~~percentage~~shares ~~tradable~~and inwarrants ~~any~~are ~~calendar~~subject ~~quarter shall be increased by an amount proportionate~~ to ~~the~~trading ~~amount~~restrictions, ~~by which~~ the ~~trading~~majority ~~volume~~ of ~~common~~them ~~stock~~are ~~exceeds 15,000,000 shares in the prior quarter~~not. ~~Furthermore~~Therefore, if the Company ~~grants~~has ~~registration~~little ~~rights~~control orover ~~issues~~the ~~shares~~timing of ~~capital~~any ~~stock~~sales ~~as part~~ of ashares ~~subsequent~~by ~~acquisition~~any of the ~~stock~~selling shareholders. orAs ~~assets~~a ~~of another company~~result, ~~and~~ the ~~sale~~market price of ~~such~~the Company’s common stock ismay ~~not~~fall ~~subject~~if toa ~~volume restrictions,~~large ~~then~~portion ~~the~~of ~~25%~~those ~~limitation~~shares ~~described~~is sold in the ~~previous~~public ~~sentence will no longer be in effect~~market. ~~With~~If the ~~exception~~Company ofissues ~~the~~shares ~~limitations~~of ~~set~~its ~~forth~~common stock in ~~this~~subsequent ~~paragraph~~transactions, ~~the~~further ~~Company does not have any control over~~ diluting the ~~timing~~number of ~~any~~shares ~~sales by the former New Moon shareholders. As a result~~outstanding, the ~~market~~ price of ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ common stock ~~may~~could ~~fall~~continue ifto afluctuate ~~large~~or ~~portion of those shares is sold in the public market~~decline.

The corporate actions of the Company are substantially controlled by principal shareholders.

The Company’s principal shareholders beneficially own approximately 50% of its outstanding common stock. These shareholders, if they acted together, could exert substantial control over matters requiring approval by the Company’s shareholders, including electing directors and approving mergers or other business combination transactions. This concentration of ownership may also influence the outcome of a change in control of the Company, which could deprive its shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their stock as part of a sale of the Company and might reduce its stock price. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by the Company’s other shareholders.

The Company will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules implemented by the Securities Exchange Commission.

As a public company, the Company incurs significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. The Company expects these new rules and regulations to increase its legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of being a public company, the Company has created additional board committees and adopted policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. The Company is currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these new rules, and cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs it may incur or the timing of such costs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003 the FASB issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and a revised interpretation of FIN No. 46 (“FIN No. 46-R”) in December 2003. FIN No. 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. ~~Should~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~form~~has ano interest in variable interest ~~entity~~entities, so the adoption of FIN No. 46-R ~~will~~had beno ~~effective~~effect aton ~~that~~the ~~time,~~Company’s ~~but~~financial ~~not later~~position ~~than~~or ~~the~~results ~~quarter~~of ~~ending March 31, 2004~~operations.

3032

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

~~Reference~~Market-Rate isSensitive ~~made~~Instruments ~~to part II, Item 7A, Quantitative~~ and ~~Qualitative Disclosures about Market~~ Risk, inManagement ~~the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003.~~

The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. It does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

Interest-Rate Risk

As of September 30, 2003 the Company had cash of $3.2 million, consisting of cash and highly liquid money market instruments with maturities of less than 90 days. Because of the short maturities of these instruments, a sudden change in market interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of the portfolio. The Company would not expect operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest on its portfolio.

Foreign Exchange Risks

Currently, the Company denominates sales to some European customers in Euro dollars and also incurs expenses related to its European operations in UK pounds and Euro dollars. Through May 2001, the Company used forward foreign exchange contracts to manage foreign exchange exposures associated with underlying assets, liabilities and anticipated transactions. Since the completion of the transaction in which the Company sold the Server Software and Professional Services divisions to Caldera International, the Company does not believe the foreign exchange risk is great enough to warrant the purchase of forward foreign exchange contracts.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The events cited in this report are the subject of the restatement that resulted from material weaknesses in the Company’s system of internal controls and operations. The Company has taken and intends to continue to take measures to cure these weaknesses, which include changes in senior management and tightening internal policies and procedures.

The Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. Based upon their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the Company reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, except as noted below with respect to the restatement.

(b) Changes in internal controls.

~~Due~~There tohas ~~the~~been ~~matters~~no ~~that~~change ~~caused~~in the ~~restatement~~Company’s ofinternal ~~the~~control ~~audited~~over ~~consolidated~~ financial reporting ~~statements~~that ~~and~~occurred ~~related~~during ~~notes for~~ the ~~three~~most ~~and~~recent ~~twelve~~fiscal ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~that ~~September~~has ~~30,~~materially ~~2002~~affected ~~and~~or ~~the~~is ~~unaudited~~reasonably ~~condensed~~likely ~~consolidated~~to ~~financial~~materially ~~statements~~affect ~~and related notes for~~ the ~~three~~Company’s ~~months~~internal ~~ended~~control ~~December~~over ~~31,~~financial ~~2002~~reporting. ~~and~~The ~~three and six months ended March 31, 2003, the~~ Company ~~has~~will ~~taken~~continue ato ~~number~~assess ofdisclosure ~~steps~~controls toand procedures ~~improve~~and ~~the~~will ~~effectiveness~~take ofany ~~internal~~further ~~controls,~~actions ~~including~~that ~~the~~are ~~following:~~deemed necessary.

~~The~~33 ~~Company now requires extensive sales certifications from all sales representatives and systems engineers to be provided to the Company’s finance department.~~

The Company now requires proof of an end user purchase order when fulfilling transactions over $25,000.

The Company now requires all distributors to submit sales out reports and inventory reports prior to the closing of a financial period.

The Company drafted a revenue recognition handbook and distributed to all sales personnel. Each person in sales has certified they have read and understand the handbook.

We believe that these efforts have addressed the material weaknesses and significant deficiencies that affected our internal controls in 2002 and 2003. The Company continues to improve and refine its internal controls. This process is ongoing, and the Company seeks to foster an exemplary internal control environment.

Other than as summarized above, there has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company will continue to assess disclosure controls and procedures and will take any further actions that are deemed necessary.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On August 28, 2003, a former Tarantella sales representative filed an action against Tarantella, Inc. and Tarantella International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Tarantella Inc., (collectively, “Tarantella”) in the California Superior Court in Santa Clara County, California. The complaint purports to state claims for breach of contract, negligent and intentional misrepresentation, fraud, and deceit. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is owed commissions on certain sales of Tarantella products, and seeks an unspecified amount of damages, correction of the purported contract, prejudgment interest, punitive damages and costs. On September 25, 2003, Tarantella filed a response denying the claims and asserting affirmative defenses. Both parties currently have motions pending before the court to attempt to resolve some of the plaintiff’s claims. The case ~~is presently~~has inbeen ~~the~~set ~~discovery~~for ~~stage~~trial on October 25, 2004.

Tarantella believes the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intends to continue to defend the action vigorously. Should the plaintiff’s claims succeed, however, Tarantella could be required to pay monetary damages, which could have a material adverse effect on Tarantella’s business, financial position and results of operations.

No other material legal proceedings are pending to which the Company is a party.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

On December 26, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of common stock and warrants resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,750,000. In connection with the financing, the Company paid fees in the amount of $~~232~~91,~~303~~250. In the private placement, the investors purchased 2,750,000 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 550,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.39 per share. The warrants are exercisable for five years. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale ~~once the Company has complied with its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and is permitted to register its securities under the securities laws~~. In connection with the investment, the Company also amended its existing shareholder rights plan such that Special Situations shall be permitted to acquire up to 30% beneficial ownership of the outstanding stock of the Company without triggering the Company’s shareholder rights plan, provided that for purposes of determining Special Situations’ beneficial ownership, neither the warrants nor any future exercises of warrants will be considered.

On February 19, 2004, the Company announced the completion of a second private placement of common stock and warrants to various investors. In the private placement, the investors purchased 11,678,580 shares of Tarantella common stock at a price of $1.40 per share for gross proceeds of $16,350,000. The investors also acquired warrants to purchase up to an additional 2,335,714 shares at an exercise price of $1.70 per share. The warrants are exercisable for five years. If the warrants are fully exercised, the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $3,970,714. The Company also has agreed to register the shares of common stock issued to the investors as well as the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants for resale. In connection with the financing, the Company paid fees in the amount of $1,198,000, which included placement agent fees, legal and accounting fees and issued warrants to purchase 322,500 shares at $1.70 per share.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

~~Not~~The ~~applicable~~Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 27, 2004. At the meeting, shareholders voted upon the following actions:

(a)

Election of Directors:


	FOR	WITHHELD
Ninian Eadie	23,583,584	183,114

Ronald Lachman	23,596,875	169,823

Douglas L. Michels	23,520,449	246,249

Alok Mohan	23,546,759	219,939

Bruce Ryan	23,588,646	178,052

Francis E. Wilde	23,569,861	196,837

Gilbert P. Williamson	23,573,695	193,003

The seven nominees who received the highest number of votes (all of the above individuals) were elected to the Board of Directors, and will serve as directors until our next annual meeting and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

(b)

Amendment of 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 1,500,000 shares:


FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN	NON-VOTES
18,600,866	786,610	35,453	4,343,769

The amendment was approved.

(c)

Amendment of Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 250,000 shares:


FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN	NON-VOTES
19,106,630	283,434	32,865	4,343,769

The amendment was approved.

(d)

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent public accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004:


FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN	NON-VOTES
23,648,884	62,966	54,848	0

The appointment was ratified.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable

3236

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

31.1		~~Certification~~Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		~~Certification~~Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		~~Certification~~Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		~~Certification~~Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

The Company filed the following ~~Report~~Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2003.~~2004:

On ~~December~~April 112, ~~2003~~2004, Tarantella, Inc. filed a Report on on Form 8-K announcing that ~~the~~on ~~Board~~March of29, ~~Directors~~2004, of the Company ~~had~~completed ~~appointed~~the ~~Frank~~acquisition ~~Wilde~~of asCaststream, ~~the~~Inc., ~~President~~a privately-held California corporation (“Caststream”), ~~CEO~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~Director~~a ofStock Exchange Agreement (the ~~Company~~“Agreement”), ~~replacing~~dated ~~Doug~~March 29, ~~Michels~~2004. ~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~further~~the ~~announced~~Agreement, ~~that~~Tarantella itpurchased ~~had~~all ~~signed~~of ~~definitive~~the ~~agreements~~outstanding shares of Caststream in exchange for a ~~private~~ ~~placement~~total of 200,000 newly issued shares of Tarantella common stock and warrants. ~~with~~In aaddition, ~~group~~Tarantella ofassumed ~~investors~~certain liabilities estimated to be approximately $40,000.

On ~~October~~ 21April 2, ~~2003~~2004, Tarantella, Inc. filed a Report on Form 8-K/A ~~announcing~~amending a Form 8-K that ~~the~~was ~~Company~~filed ~~had~~on ~~received~~June ~~notification~~9, ~~from~~2003. ~~the~~The ~~Nasdaq~~original ~~Listing~~Form ~~Qualifications~~8-K ~~Panel~~filing ~~that~~announced the completion of the Company’s ~~stock~~acquisition ~~would~~of ~~discontinue~~New ~~trading~~Moon onSystems ~~the~~Inc., ~~Nasdaq~~a ~~SmallCap~~privately-held ~~market~~California. atThe amendment added ~~commencement~~pro-forma offinancial ~~business~~information onthat ~~October~~was ~~21,~~not ~~2003~~available at the time of the original filing.

On ~~October~~April 26, ~~2003~~2004, Tarantella, Inc. filed a Report on Form 8-K ~~announcing~~reporting ~~that~~ the ~~Company~~results ~~had~~of ~~entered~~operations ~~into~~for ~~a Purchase Agreement dated September 29, 2003, by and among~~ Tarantella, Inc. and certain investors named therein (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Special Situations Funds purchased 1,462,500 shares and Vertical Ventures purchased 487,500 shares of the Company’s ~~common~~first ~~stock~~fiscal atquarter ~~the average closing bid price per share~~ for the ~~last~~period ~~five~~ended ~~trading~~December ~~days~~31, ~~or $1.156 per share. The transactions contemplated in the Agreement closed on September 30,~~ 2003. ~~The Agreement also includes accompanying warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,950,000 shares (at equal numbers of shares purchased by each investor) at a price of $1.395 per share.~~

33On April 6, 2004, Tarantella, Inc. filed a Report on Form 8-K announcing that on March 29, 2004, the Company completed a Purchase Agreement with Olympus Securities, LLC (the “Olympus Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company issued 140,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share in lieu of payment of a finder’s fee owed to Olympus Securities, LLC for the December 2003 private placement of the Company’s securities. Further, the Company has an obligation to file a registration statement for the registration of the shares.

On April 30, 2004, Tarantella, Inc. filed a Report on Form 8-K reporting the results of operations for Tarantella’s second fiscal quarter for the period ended March 31, 2004.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TARANTELLA, INC.
		/s/ JOHN M. GREELEY
By:		/s/ JOHN M. GREELEY
		John M. Greeley Vice President, Chief Financial Officer April 2, 2004
		John M. Greeley Vice President, Chief Financial Officer August 16, 2004
		/s/ JENNY TWADDLE
By:		/s/ ROBERT MORLEY
		Jenny Twaddle Vice President, Corporate Controller April 2, 2004
		Robert Morley Vice President, Corporate Controller August 16, 2004

3438

Filing Compare · TARANTELLA INC