UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the ~~quarterly~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~July~~April 3130, ~~2004~~2005

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-2389

ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia		54-0585263
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
P.O. Box 13948, Roanoke, Virginia		24038-3948
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

102 Westside Blvd., N.W., Roanoke, Virginia		24017
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (540) 342-1831

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (~~540~~1) ~~342-1831~~has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

(Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant’s ~~telephone~~is ~~number,~~an ~~including~~accelerated ~~area~~filer ~~code~~(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨

~~N/A~~As of April 30, 2005, 11,145,813 shares of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation common stock were issued and outstanding.

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if

changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of July 31, 2004.

10,976,813 Shares outstanding

ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

CONTENTS

			Page
1. Part I	-	Financial Information	3 - 20
Part I		Financial Information
~~Item 1.~~	Item 1.	Financial Statements
a.		Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	1
b.		Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss)	4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited)	2
c.		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	3
d.		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6 - 12
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4
e.		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	13
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14 - 18
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	19
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	19
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	19
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures	20
Part II		Other Information
2. Part II	-	Other Information	21 - 22
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	20
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	21
Signatures			20
Item 6.		Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	21 - 22
3. Signatures			23
4. Exhibit Index pursuant to Regulation S-K			24 - 25
5. Exhibits			26 - 54

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	(Unaudited)
	April 30, 2005		October 31, 2004
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,644,935	$	869,000
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,769,521 in 2005 and $5,338,719 in 2004		75,933,968		75,558,674
Inventories		114,541,800		102,099,659
Prepaid and other expenses		2,167,102		1,898,841
Deferred income taxes		8,158,224		8,011,122

Total current assets		202,446,029		188,437,296

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Land		7,589,353		7,734,589
Buildings		44,537,389		44,811,189
Manufacturing machinery and equipment		137,554,659		136,230,189
Trucks and forklifts		7,507,906		7,673,533
Fabricating plant equipment		20,743,444		20,238,613
Land improvements		8,783,233		8,800,131
Office equipment		2,673,134		2,648,100
Assets under construction		2,162,763		2,205,425

Total		231,551,881		230,341,769
Less—accumulated depreciation		123,344,292		117,318,369

Property, plant and equipment, net		108,207,589		113,023,400

GOODWILL		13,868,647		13,868,647

OTHER ASSETS		3,499,332		3,641,690

TOTAL ASSETS	$	328,021,597	$	318,971,033

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligation	$	6,020,112	$	6,019,598
Bank overdraft		925,017		4,777,540
Accounts payable		31,611,727		31,286,346
Dividends payable		1,226,040		1,211,740
Employees’ taxes withheld		227,275		248,408
Accrued profit sharing contribution		5,267,198		7,281,552
Accrued wages and expenses		12,863,694		11,964,585
Accrued income taxes		3,228,465		10,146,773

Total current liabilities		61,369,528		72,936,542

LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION
Notes and capital lease obligation		71,242,420		64,960,960
Less—current portion		6,020,112		6,019,598

Total long-term debt and capital lease obligation		65,222,308		58,941,362

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		26,749,620		28,152,620

OTHER LIABILITIES		4,165,550		3,545,148

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock—no par value—authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued 12,418,927 shares in 2005 and 12,288,927 in 2004		6,930,935		5,333,829
Additional paid-in capital		1,353,839		885,427
Retained earnings		163,047,685		149,731,709
Accumulated other comprehensive income		—		262,264

Total		171,332,459		156,213,229
Less—treasury stock, 1,273,114 shares — at cost		817,868		817,868

Total stockholders’ equity		170,514,591		155,395,361

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	328,021,597	$	318,971,033

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings


	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended April 30,						(Unaudited) Six Months Ended April 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
SALES	$	137,868,454		$	116,012,871		$	269,178,437		$	201,186,556

COSTS
Cost of sales		115,416,009			97,045,170			218,130,475			173,546,548
Profit sharing		2,093,723			2,223,586			4,951,105			3,033,092

Total		117,509,732			99,268,756			223,081,580			176,579,640

GROSS EARNINGS		20,358,722			16,744,115			46,096,857			24,606,916

OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES (INCOME)
Administrative		8,182,154			6,743,876			16,026,590			13,709,669
Interest expense		942,067			809,670			1,793,270			1,932,608
Profit sharing		491,120			521,582			1,185,545			711,467
Interest income		(25,262	)		(57,454	)		(47,244	)		(132,710	)
Antitrust litigation settlement		—			—			—			(3,061,820	)

Total		9,590,079			8,017,674			18,958,161			13,159,214

EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		10,768,643			8,726,441			27,138,696			11,447,702
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		4,186,462			3,488,615			10,693,000			4,573,232

EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		6,582,181			5,237,826			16,445,696			6,874,470

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (NOTE 1) LOSS FROM OPERATIONS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (INCLUDING LOSS ON SALE)		—			(26,283	)		(1,118,263	)		(197,896	)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT		—			(10,513	)		(440,622	)		(79,158	)

LOSS ON DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		—			(15,770	)		(677,641	)		(118,738	)

NET EARNINGS	$	6,582,181		$	5,222,056		$	15,768,055		$	6,755,732

Earnings (loss) per share of common stock:
Earnings from continuing operations:
Basic	$	0.59		$	0.48		$	1.48		$	0.63
Diluted	$	0.58		$	0.47		$	1.46		$	0.62

Loss on discontinued operations:
Basic		—			(0.00	)		(0.06	)		(0.01	)
Diluted		—			(0.00	)		(0.06	)		(0.01	)

Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic	$	0.59		$	0.48		$	1.42		$	0.62
Diluted	$	0.58		$	0.47		$	1.40		$	0.61

Cash dividends per share of common stock	$	0.11		$	0.10		$	0.22		$	0.15

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding :
Basic		11,143,869			10,938,880			11,090,617			10,935,813

Diluted		11,289,086			11,040,420			11,233,389			11,007,791

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

~~PART~~Roanoke IElectric -Steel ~~FINANCIAL~~Corporation ~~INFORMATION~~

~~ITEM~~Condensed 1Consolidated -Statements ~~FINANCIAL~~of ~~STATEMENTS~~Cash Flows

ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION


	(Unaudited) Six Months Ended April 30,
	2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings	$	15,768,055		$	6,755,732
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash used in operating activities:
Directors’ retirement plan liability		870,803			—
Deferred compensation liability		(16,624	)		6,948
Postretirement liabilities		(251,810	)		(76,425	)
Landfill closure obligation		18,033			16,817
Depreciation and amortization		7,206,751			7,644,672
Stock-based compensation expense		468,412			—
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment		82,026			3,868
Gain on sale of investments		—			(194	)
Deferred income taxes		(1,403,000	)		(987,000	)
Loss on sale of subsidiary		790,685			—
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash, exclusive of changes shown separately		(25,319,094	)		(13,590,880	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(1,785,763	)		(226,462	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(3,357,007	)		(1,710,831	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		123,612			29,360
Sale of investments		—			645,549
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary		4,206,829			—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		973,434			(1,035,922	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividends		(2,452,079	)		(1,641,422	)
Increase in dividends payable		14,300			548,140
Payment of long-term debt		(22,708,868	)		(22,687	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		29,000,000			—
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options		1,597,106			161,370
Repayment of bank overdraft		(3,852,523	)		—
Interest rate swap termination fee		—			(376,069	)
Payment of capital lease principal		(9,672	)		(9,182	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,588,264			(1,339,850	)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		775,935			(2,602,234	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		869,000			13,422,044

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	1,644,935		$	10,819,810

CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES WHICH PROVIDED (USED) CASH, EXCLUSIVE OF CHANGES SHOWN SEPARATELY
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable	$	(2,720,872	)	$	(11,690,791	)
(Increase) decrease in refundable income taxes		—			608,244
(Increase) decrease in inventories		(14,256,495	)		(17,371,806	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid and other expenses		(656,090	)		(177,241	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		23,668			265,681
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		345,381			6,880,313
Increase (decrease) in employees’ taxes withheld		(21,133	)		197,276
Increase (decrease) in accrued profit sharing contribution		(2,014,354	)		2,708,210
Increase (decrease) in accrued wages and expenses		899,109			1,716,620
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes		(6,918,308	)		3,272,614

Total	$	(25,319,094	)	$	(13,590,880	)

The accompanying notes to condensed ~~Consolidated~~consolidated ~~Balance~~financial ~~Sheets~~statements are an integral part of these statements.

	(Unaudited)
	July 31, 2004			October 31,2003
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,527,477		$	13,422,044
Investments		23,913			3,778,392
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,270,579 in 2004 and $3,430,029 in 2003		66,560,274			46,469,280
Refundable income taxes		—			608,244
Inventories		85,644,442			59,565,245
Prepaid expenses		1,429,734			1,466,176
Deferred income taxes		5,487,203			5,525,279
Total current assets		167,673,043			130,834,660
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Land		7,734,589			7,734,589
Buildings		45,295,153			45,099,325
Manufacturing machinery and equipment		137,240,097			136,053,175
Trucks and forklifts		7,373,712			7,242,124
Fabricating plant equipment		20,193,544			19,693,180
Land improvements		9,109,266			8,993,364
Office equipment		2,766,393			2,537,117
Assets under construction		1,603,818			1,375,707
Total		231,316,572			228,728,581
Less—accumulated depreciation		116,191,244			105,323,406
Property, plant and equipment, net		115,125,328			123,405,175
GOODWILL		13,868,647			13,868,647
OTHER ASSETS		2,227,587			2,759,004
TOTAL ASSETS	$	298,894,605		$	270,867,486
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligation	$	15,023,328		$	7,560,884
Accounts payable		32,390,226			24,540,814
Dividends payable		1,097,681			546,641
Employees’ taxes withheld		322,378			275,112
Accrued profit sharing contribution		7,682,404			1,339,642
Accrued wages and expenses		13,499,284			11,289,678
Accrued income taxes		4,255,470			—
Total current liabilities		74,270,771			45,552,771
LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION
Notes and capital lease payable		67,717,673			71,519,832
Less—current portion		15,023,328			7,560,884
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligation		52,694,345			63,958,948
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		28,686,416			29,908,754
OTHER LIABILITIES		4,567,808			5,381,389
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock—no par value—authorized 20,000,000 shares, issued 12,249,927 shares in 2004 and 12,205,927 in 2003		4,849,749			4,394,889
Retained earnings		135,011,078			123,236,904
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(367,694.00	)		(748,301.00	)
Total		139,493,133			126,883,492
Less—treasury stock, 1,273,114 shares — at cost		817,868			817,868
Total stockholders’ equity		138,675,265			126,065,624
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	298,894,605		$	270,867,486

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION

~~Consolidated~~Notes ~~Statements~~to ofCondensed ~~Earnings~~Consolidated ~~(Loss)~~Financial Statements

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended July 31,					(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2004		2003			2004			2003
SALES	$	129,443,989	$	82,285,245		$	335,649,021		$	220,490,923
COST OF SALES		103,505,946		76,028,790			281,490,908			206,884,930
GROSS EARNINGS		25,938,043		6,256,455			54,158,113			13,605,993
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES (INCOME)
Administrative		8,122,013		5,471,207			22,659,114			16,318,519
Interest, net		771,094		1,246,546			2,570,992			3,752,732
Profit sharing		4,118,966		75,000			7,814,051			230,400
Antitrust litigation settlement		—		—			(3,061,820	)		(520,960	)
Total		13,012,073		6,792,753			29,982,337			19,780,691
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE		12,925,970		(536,298	)		24,175,776			(6,174,698	)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)		5,168,425		(216,729	)		9,662,499			(2,477,420	)
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE		7,757,545		(319,569	)		14,513,277			(3,697,278	)
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE		—		—			—			(228,410	)
NET EARNINGS (LOSS)	$	7,757,545	$	(319,569	)	$	14,513,277		$	(3,925,688	)
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock:
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle:
Basic	$	0.71	$	(0.03	)	$	1.33		$	(0.34	)
Diluted	$	0.70	$	(0.03	)	$	1.32		$	(0.34	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle:
Basic		—		—			—			(0.02	)
Diluted		—		—			—			(0.02	)
Net earnings (loss) per share of common stock:
Basic	$	0.71	$	(0.03	)	$	1.33		$	(0.36	)
Diluted	$	0.70	$	(0.03	)	$	1.32		$	(0.36	)
Cash dividends per share of common stock	$	0.10	$	0.05		$	0.25		$	0.15
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding :
Basic		10,958,009		10,937,683			10,943,266			10,941,084
Diluted		11,045,557		10,937,683			11,014,517			10,945,119

April 30, 2005

~~The accompanying~~Note ~~notes~~1. toRoanoke ~~consolidated~~Electric ~~financial~~Steel ~~statements~~Corporation ~~are~~is both an ~~integral~~operating ~~part~~company and a holding company with both direct and indirect subsidiaries. A complete list of ~~these~~Roanoke ~~statements~~Electric Steel’s subsidiaries is incorporated by reference to the previously filed Form 10-K (Exhibit No. 21) for October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For purposes of this Form 10-Q, the defined term “Company” will, depending on the context, refer to Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis or refer to Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation as an operating company.

In the opinion of the management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of April 30, 2005 and the results of operations for the three months and six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 and cash flows for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004. Refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for a description of major accounting policies.

Revenue is primarily recognized when title transfers upon shipment. Additionally, revenue is recognized on certain fabricated products sold pursuant to construction contracts utilizing the percentage-of-completion method. Percentage of completion is measured principally based on steel consumed on finished product as a percentage of the estimated steel required for each contract. The Company recognizes profit at the time revenue is recognized, based on estimates as to the project status and the costs remaining to complete a particular project. Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts were $8,318,637 as of April 30, 2005 and $3,367,434 as of October 31, 2004, and are included in accounts receivable. Such fabricated products accounted for approximately 18% and 14% of the Company’s consolidated sales for the six-month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and approximately 17% and 15% of the Company’s consolidated sales for the three-month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company records shipping and handling expenses in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) No. 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Cost”. Shipping and handling charges, billed to the customer, are included in sales revenues and costs associated with such shipments are included in cost of sales.

Certain amounts included in this Form 10-Q filing for prior years have been reclassified from their original presentation to conform with the current year presentation.

Stock-Based Compensation

The 2005 Stock Plan

On January 28, 2005, the shareholders of the Company approved the “Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan” (the “2005 Stock Plan”). The 2005 Stock Plan is integral to the Company’s compensation strategy and programs and is intended to help the Company recruit, motivate and retain the caliber of employees and outside directors essential to the Company’s success, and will further align the interests of those employees and outside directors with the interests of the Company’s shareholders.

A maximum of 1,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock is available for issuance under the 2005 Stock Plan, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of any stock dividend or other distribution, stock split, merger, consolidation, combination, share repurchase or exchange or other similar transaction or event. No more than 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued under incentive awards to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries, and no more than 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock may be issued to outside directors.

The 2005 Stock Plan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance grants, and deferred shares and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The 2005 Stock Plan does not amend the Employees’ Stock Option Plan or the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. There are 0 and 1,000 shares available for

~~ROANOKE~~future ~~ELECTRIC~~issuance ~~STEEL~~under ~~CORPORATION~~these existing plans. As of April 30, 2005, options covering 217,500 and 22,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding under the Employee’s Stock Option Plan and Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, respectively.

On January 28, 2005, the Compensation Committee approved, and the Board of Directors ratified, an aggregate of 192,080 ~~Consolidated~~performance ~~Statements~~grants to certain executives under the 2005 Stock Plan. A performance grant is an award of ~~Cash~~a ~~Flows~~base number of performance shares. Of these awards, 34,570 performance shares have a one-year performance period ending on October 31, 2005, 69,140 have a two-year performance period ending on October 31, 2006, and 88,370 have a three-year performance period ending on October 31, 2007. An employee is entitled to receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each performance share that vests at the end of a specified performance period. For any performance shares to vest, an employee must remain in continuous employment (subject to certain exceptions for death, disability, or retirement) until the end of the specified performance period. The number of performance shares that vest will be determined based on the Company’s average return on invested capital relative to the average return on invested capital of peer companies, with none of the base number of shares vesting if the Company’s relative average return on invested capital is less than the 45th percentile, and 25%, 100%, and 200% of the base number of shares vesting if the Company’s relative average return on invested capital equals the 45th, 75th and 95th percentile, respectively. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule, if the Company’s average return on invested capital is negative for a performance period, no more than 25% of the base number of performance shares will vest. In the event of a change of control, 100% of the base number of performance shares will vest.

	(Unaudited) Nine Months EndedJuly 31,
	2004			2003
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss)	$	14,513,277		$	(3,925,688	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax		—			228,410
Deferred compensation liability		24,647			28,897
Postretirement liabilities		(114,637	)		229,274
Landfill closure obligation		25,226			23,525
Depreciation and amortization		11,540,685			11,889,582
Loss on sale of investments and property, plant and equipment		52,393			96,939
Deferred income taxes		(1,438,000	)		(901,000	)
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash, exclusive of changes shown separately		(24,725,799	)		5,209,209
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(122,208	)		12,879,148
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(2,675,051	)		(1,874,315	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		29,360			7,440
Sale of investments		3,686,141			10,525,106
Proceeds from sale of land and other		271,370			(739,276	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,311,820			7,918,955
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividends		(2,739,103	)		(1,640,922	)
Increase (decrease) in dividends payable		551,040			(501	)
Payment of long-term debt		(3,788,295	)		(18,781,746	)
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options		454,860			—
Repurchase of common stock		—			(70,140	)
Loan costs		—			(285,000	)
Interest rate swap termination fee		(548,817	)		(660,261	)
Payment of capital lease principal		(13,864	)		—
Net cash used in financing activities		(6,084,179	)		(21,438,570	)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(4,894,567	)		(640,467	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		13,422,044			12,051,362
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	8,527,477		$	11,410,895
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES WHICH PROVIDED (USED) CASH, EXCLUSIVE OF CHANGES SHOWN SEPARATELY
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable	$	(20,090,994	)	$	(3,564,662	)
(Increase) decrease in refundable income taxes		608,244			1,979,887
(Increase) decrease in inventories		(26,079,197	)		5,149,549
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		36,442			(843,512	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		7,849,412			2,937,011
Increase (decrease) in employees’ taxes withheld		47,266			90,017
Increase (decrease) in accrued profit sharing contribution		6,342,762			(342,735	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued wages and expenses		2,304,796			(196,346	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes		4,255,470			—
Total	$	(24,725,799	)	$	5,209,209

Also on January 28, 2005, each of the Company’s six outside directors received an automatic award of 1,500 shares of restricted stock of the Company pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Stock Plan. The shares of restricted stock will become fully vested and transferable if the outside director remains in continuous service on the Board of Directors until January 28, 2006.

~~The accompanying~~Accounting ~~notes~~for toStock-Based ~~consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.~~ Compensation

Prior to November 1, 2004, the Company accounted for share-based payments under the intrinsic value method recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations. In accordance with APB No. 25, compensation cost was recognized over the applicable service period for the difference between the exercise price of the award and the fair value of the stock price on the grant date. During 2004, options were granted for 112,500 shares. There was full recognition of the related compensation cost of $68,625 during the three months ended April 30, 2004.

On November 1, 2004, the Company early adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123 R”). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and purchases under employee stock purchase plans, to be recognized as an operating expense in the income statement. The cost of such share-based payments is to be recognized over the requisite service period based on fair values measured on the grant date of the award. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method. Under this method, SFAS No. 123R applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after October 31, 2004. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of October 31, 2004 is recognized as the requisite service is rendered. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R had no effect on the Company’s financial statements at the date of adoption, since the requisite service had been rendered for all awards outstanding as of October 31, 2004.

Under SFAS No. 123R, the fair value of each performance grant and each share of restricted stock issued on January 28, 2005, is equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on that date. Unamortized compensation cost of $1,896,790 related to 96,040 performance shares will be recognized over the requisite service period of one to three years and may be adjusted based on management’s future estimates of the amount of performance shares that will vest based on the Company’s performance relative to its peers. Compensation expense of $290,662 is reflected in the consolidated statements of earnings for the three months and six months ended April 30, 2005. The total fair value of 9,000 restricted shares awarded to directors of $177,750 was recognized during the 2005 second quarter.

~~ROANOKE~~Discontinued ~~ELECTRIC~~Operations ~~STEEL CORPORATION~~

~~Notes~~On January 27, 2005, RESCO Steel Products Corporation (“RESCO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, sold its reinforcing bar fabrication assets, which represented substantially all of its assets, to ~~Consolidated~~Rockingham ~~Financial~~Steel, ~~Statements~~Inc. (“Rockingham Steel”), a reinforcing bar fabricator located in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The original agreed upon price for the assets sold by RESCO was $4.85 million. After adjustments for changes in inventory, accounts receivable and accounts payable, from November 30, 2004 through January 27, 2005, the final purchase price was $4.2 million. In connection with the close of operations of RESCO, the Company incurred one-time charges of $550,000 associated with the sale, representing (1) $330,000 for costs associated with termination of employees, including severance, accrued vacation, insurance and other miscellaneous benefits and (2) $220,000 for transaction costs, including legal, investment banking, accounting and other professional fees, and other miscellaneous costs of the transaction. Such costs are included in the loss from discontinued operations in the accompanying statement of earnings for the six months ended April 30, 2005. The results of RESCO are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings and include a pre-tax loss on the sale and discontinued operations of RESCO of $790,685.

~~July~~Revenues 31of $4,045,515 and pre-tax loss of $1,118,263 (which includes the $790,685 loss on sale) related to RESCO are included in discontinued operations for the six months ended April 30, 2005. Revenues of $5,018,476 and $2,936,651 and pre-tax losses of $197,896 and $26,283 related to RESCO are included in discontinued operations for the six months and three months ended April 30, 2004, respectively. The carrying amounts as of October 31, 2004 of the major classes of assets and liabilities disposed were as follows: accounts receivable of $2,589,211, inventories of $1,891,114, and net property, plant and equipment of $864,090.

Note 12. ~~Roanoke~~Inventories ~~Electric~~of ~~Steel~~the ~~Corporation~~Company isare ~~both~~valued anat ~~operating~~the ~~company~~lower ~~and~~of acost ~~holding~~or ~~company with both direct and indirect subsidiaries~~market. ACost ~~complete list of Roanoke Electric Steel’s subsidiaries~~ is ~~incorporated~~determined byprincipally ~~reference~~using toeither the ~~previously~~first-in, ~~filed Form 10~~first-Kout (~~Exhibit~~“FIFO”) ~~No.~~or ~~21)~~cost ~~for~~averaging ~~October~~method ~~31,~~of ~~2003,~~accounting asand ~~filed~~includes ~~with~~materials, ~~the~~costs ~~Securities~~of production and ~~Exchange~~manufacturing ~~Commission~~overhead. ~~For~~The ~~purposes~~determination of ~~this~~market ~~Form~~includes ~~10-Q,~~such ~~the~~factors ~~defined~~as ~~term~~utility ~~“Registrant”~~of ~~will~~goods, ~~depending on~~ the ~~context,~~ability ~~refer~~ to ~~Roanoke~~dispose ~~Electric~~of ~~Steel~~the ~~Corporation~~goods ~~and~~in ~~its~~the ~~subsidiaries~~ordinary oncourse aof ~~combined~~business, ~~basis~~physical orobsolescence ~~refer~~and tochanges ~~Roanoke~~in ~~Electric~~price ~~Steel Corporation as an operating company~~levels.

InInventories ~~the~~include ~~opinion of~~ the ~~Registrant,~~following ~~the~~major ~~accompanying~~classifications: unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of July 31, 2004 and the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2003 and cash flows for the nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2003.

Revenue for products other than joists is recognized upon the shipment of finished goods. Additionally, revenue is recognized on certain fabricated products utilizing the percentage of completion method. Percentage-of-completion is measured principally by the units-of-work completed method. Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts were $5,279,256 and $3,241,049 as of July 31, 2004 and October 31, 2003, respectively, and are included in accounts receivable. Such fabricated products accounted for approximately 20% of the Registrant’s consolidated sales for each period presented.


	(Unaudited)
	April 30, 2005		October 31, 2004
Scrap steel	$	12,347,520	$	13,839,442
Melt supplies		5,583,789		4,216,074
Billets		16,082,075		12,226,288
Mill supplies		5,671,218		4,840,071
Work-in-process		14,594,010		14,568,837
Finished steel		60,263,188		52,408,947

Total inventories	$	114,541,800	$	102,099,659

Note 3. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average shares of outstanding common stock. The ~~Registrant~~calculation ~~records~~of ~~shipping~~diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator includes dilutive common stock equivalents such as stock options and ~~handling~~performance ~~expenses~~grants. inBasic ~~accordance~~earnings ~~with~~per ~~Emerging~~share ~~Issues~~and ~~Task~~diluted ~~Force~~earnings ~~Issue~~per ~~(“EITF”)~~share calculated in accordance with SFAS No. ~~00-10~~ 128, “~~Accounting~~Earnings ~~for~~per ~~Shipping~~Share”, ~~and~~are ~~Handling~~presented ~~Fees~~in ~~and~~the ~~Cost”~~consolidated statements of earnings. ~~Shipping~~No ~~and~~options ~~handling~~were ~~charges~~antidilutive at April 30, ~~billed~~2005. Options to ~~the~~purchase ~~customer~~206,500 ~~are~~and ~~included~~121,500 inshares ~~sales~~of ~~revenues~~common stock were outstanding at April 30, 2004, for the six month and ~~costs~~three ~~associated~~month ~~with~~periods ~~such~~then ~~shipments~~ended, ~~are~~respectively, but were not included in ~~cost~~the computation of ~~sales.~~diluted earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive.

Certain amounts included in this Form 10-Q filing for prior years have been reclassified from their original presentation to conform with the current year presentation.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Registrant’s stock option plans are described more fully in Note 12 of its 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders. In December 2002, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, was issued. This statement was issued to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to SFAS 123 in paragraphs 2 (a)-2 (e) of this statement were effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002.

The Registrant accounts for stock options under the intrinsic value method of recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations. Under the intrinsic value method, no compensation expense is recorded if the exercise price of the Registrant’s stock options is equal to or

~~greater~~Note ~~than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant~~4. ~~Compensation~~The ~~cost~~components of ~~$68,625~~comprehensive ~~and $137~~earnings,~~250~~ for the three and nine months ended in July 31, 2004, respectively, and $45,716 and $121,909 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2003, respectively, was recognized where the exercise price was less than the market price of the stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net ~~earnings (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Registrant had applied the fair value recognition provisions~~ of ~~SFAS~~taxes, ~~123~~were toas ~~stock-based employee compensation~~follows:

	(Unaudited)Three Months EndedJuly 31,						(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedJuly 31,
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	Three Months Ended April 30,						Six Months Ended April 30,
Net earnings (loss), as reported	$	7,757,545		$	(319,569	)	$	14,513,277		$	(3,925,688	)
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards net of related tax effects		(102,530	)		(90,022	)		(200,950	)		(156,614	)
Net earnings	$	6,582,181		$	5,222,056		$	15,768,055		$	6,755,732
Pro forma net earnings (loss)	$	7,655,015		$	(409,591	)	$	14,312,327		$	(4,082,302	)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss):
Net earnings (loss) per share:
Unrealized gains (losses) on qualifying cash flow hedges:
As reported:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during period (net of tax)		28,376			(41,613	)		(280,943	)		18,928
Basic	$	0.71		$	(0.03	)	$	1.33		$	(0.36	)
Reclassification adjustments for gains realized in net earnings (net of tax)		(17,240	)		38,400			60,290			50,915
Diluted	$	0.70		$	(0.03	)	$	1.32		$	(0.36	)
Net unrealized gains (losses)		11,136			(3,213	)		(220,653	)		69,843
Pro forma:
Unrealized losses on securities:
Basic	$	0.70		$	(0.04	)	$	1.31		$	(0.37	)
Unrealized holding losses arising during period (net of tax)		—			—			(41,611	)		(116	)
Diluted	$	0.69		$	(0.04	)	$	1.30		$	(0.37	)
Reclassification adjustments for gains realized in net earnings (net of tax)		—			—			—			116
Net unrealized losses		—			—			(41,611	)		—
Accretion of past hedging relationships		—			106,250			—			220,637
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)		11,136			103,037			(262,264	)		290,480
Total comprehensive earnings	$	6,593,317		$	5,325,093		$	15,505,791		$	7,046,212

The ~~fair~~components ~~value~~ of ~~each~~accumulated ~~option~~other iscomprehensive ~~estimated~~income onare ~~the~~as ~~date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions~~follows:

	(Unaudited)Three Months EndedJuly 31,							(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedJuly 31,
	(Unaudited)April 30,2005			October 31,2004
	2004				2003			2004			2003
Unrealized gains on securities, net of taxes of $16,644	$	—		$	41,611
Weighted-average grant date fair value	$	4.37			$	5.53		$	4.37		$	5.53
Unrealized gains on qualifying cash flow hedges, net of taxes of $88,261		—			220,653
Weighted-average expected lives (years)		5.00				5.00			5.00			5.00
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	—		$	262,264
Weighted-average grant date fair value-exercise price less than market price	$	4.37			$	5.53		$	4.37		$	5.53
Risk-free interest rate		3.15	%			3.25	%		3.15	%		3.25	%
Expected volatility		40.00	%			67.00	%		40.00	%		67.00	%
Dividend yield		2.69	%			1.58	%		2.69	%		1.58	%

~~Due~~Note to5. ~~the~~The ~~factors (assumptions)~~Company’s ~~described~~business ~~above~~consists of one industry segment, which is the ~~above~~extracting ~~pro~~of ~~forma~~scrap ~~disclosures~~metal ~~are~~from ~~not~~discarded ~~necessarily~~automobiles ~~representative~~and the manufacturing, fabricating and marketing of ~~pro~~merchant ~~forma~~steel ~~effects~~bar onproducts ~~reported~~and ~~net~~specialty ~~income~~steel ~~for~~sections, ~~future~~open-web ~~years~~steel joists and billets. The industry segment consists of three classes of products - merchant steel products and specialty steel sections, fabricated bar joists and billets. Due to the January 27, 2005 sale of RESCO Steel Products Corporation, a wholly-owned reinforcing bar subsidiary, rebar sales have been excluded from the fabricated products class, as a result of discontinued operations.

Note 2. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally using either the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or cost averaging method of accounting and includes materials, costs of

~~production~~Financial ~~and~~Information ~~manufacturing~~Relating ~~overhead. The determination of market includes such factors as utility of goods, the ability~~ to ~~dispose~~Classes of ~~the~~Products ~~goods in the ordinary course of business, physical obsolescence and changes in price levels.~~

Inventories include the following major classifications:


	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended April 30,				(Unaudited) Six Months Ended April 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
Merchant steel and specialty steel sections	$	98,236,704	$	88,613,865	$	190,158,307	$	152,702,547
Fabricated bar joists		28,232,949		20,920,793		58,037,248		36,794,361
Billets		11,398,801		6,478,213		20,982,882		11,689,648

Total consolidated sales	$	137,868,454	$	116,012,871	$	269,178,437	$	201,186,556

	(Unaudited)July 31,2004		October 31,2003
Scrap steel	$	13,521,685	$	5,668,835
Melt supplies		4,511,105		2,554,662
Billets		6,911,471		4,066,909
Mill supplies		3,503,970		3,712,415
Work-in-process		12,916,739		6,832,299
Finished steel		44,279,472		36,730,125
Total inventories	$	85,644,442	$	59,565,245

Note 6.

Supplemental cash flow information:

Note 3. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average shares of outstanding common stock. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator includes dilutive common stock equivalents such as stock options. Basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”, are presented in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). Options to purchase 206,500 and 443,300 shares of common stock were outstanding at July 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, but were not included in the nine month computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect would be antidilutive. Options to purchase 121,500 and 459,500 shares of common stock were outstanding at July 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, but were not included in the three month computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect would be antidilutive.


	(Unaudited)
	Six Months Ended April 30,
	2005		2004
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,799,100	$	1,832,200

Income taxes (net of cash received)	$	18,573,686	$	1,600,216

Note 47. ~~The~~Historically, ~~components~~the ofCompany ~~comprehensive~~utilized ~~earnings~~interest ~~(loss)~~rate swaps to manage its exposure to movements in interest rates paid on corporate debt and that qualified as cash flow hedges. On June 25, ~~net~~1999, the Company entered into a reverse swap, converting $40,000,000 of ~~taxes~~existing term debt to a variable interest rate from a fixed rate. A fee of $1,300,000 ~~were~~was asreceived ~~follows:~~and being recorded in income ratable over the 6 1/2 years which remained to maturity of the term loan.

	(Unaudited)Three Months EndedJuly 31,						(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedJuly 31,
	2004			2003			2004		2003
Net earnings (loss)	$	7,757,545		$	(319,569	)	$	14,513,277	$	(3,925,688	)
Other comprehensive earnings:
Change in derivative financial instruments		(12,729	)		—			57,114		—
Accretion of past hedging relationships		102,856			125,794			323,493		390,359
Other comprehensive earnings		90,127			125,794			380,607		390,359
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	7,847,672		$	(193,775	)	$	14,893,884	$	(3,535,329	)

Effective November 1, 2000, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133 and, in accordance with the transition provisions, recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $1,663,516 in other comprehensive income to recognize the fair value of the swap as a cash flow hedging instrument. On April 1, 2002, the Company effected an early termination, or unwind, of its interest rate swap agreement and incurred a $3,000,179 termination fee payable to the counterparty over the term of the existing debt.

In connection with the Company’s debt refinancing on October 4, 2004, the remaining unamortized fee earned, $200,000, and unrecognized amounts included in other comprehensive loss related to these past hedges, $680,491 ($408,295 net of taxes), were recorded as adjustments to interest expense in the statement of earnings.

During fiscal year 2004, the Company entered into multiple, one-year or less, derivative commodity instruments, to minimize the exposure of price risk related to certain natural gas purchases used in the manufacturing process at its West Virginia facility. The contracts used to mitigate the price risk related to natural gas purchases were designated as effective cash flow hedges for a portion of the natural gas usage over the periods in the agreements. Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking the contracts to market were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and included in the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet as part of accumulated comprehensive income. These gains and losses were recognized in earnings in the month in which the related natural gas was used, or in the month a hedge was determined to be ineffective. There were no ineffective hedges as of April 30, 2004, but all of these cash flow hedges became ineffective during the quarter ended April 30, 2005 with the maturity, and termination, of both the gas and associated commodity derivative contracts.

Note 58. The ~~Registrant’s~~Company ~~business~~has ~~consists~~adopted the provisions of ~~one~~SFAS ~~industry~~No. ~~segment~~142, ~~which~~“Goodwill isand ~~the~~Other ~~extracting~~Intangible ofAssets”, ~~scrap~~which ~~metal~~requires ~~from~~allocating ~~discarded~~goodwill ~~automobiles~~to each reporting unit and testing for impairment using a two-step approach. Based on the ~~manufacturing~~Company’s current reporting structure, ~~fabricating~~it ~~and~~has ~~marketing~~determined ofthat ~~merchant~~it ~~steel~~operates ~~bar~~as ~~products~~three ~~and~~reporting ~~specialty~~units ~~steel~~and, ~~sections~~therefore, ~~reinforcing~~has ~~bars,~~assigned ~~open-web~~goodwill ~~steel~~at ~~joists~~the operating division level. Fair value is measured using a valuation based on market multiples, comparable transactions and ~~billets~~discounted cash flow methodologies. The ~~industry~~goodwill ~~segment~~impairment ~~consists~~test ofis ~~three~~performed ~~classes~~annually as of ~~products—merchant~~May ~~steel~~31 ~~products~~or ~~and~~whenever ~~specialty~~an ~~steel~~event ~~sections,~~has ~~fabricated~~occurred ~~bar~~that ~~joists~~would ~~and~~more ~~reinforcing~~likely ~~bars,~~than ~~and~~not ~~billets.~~reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount

	Financial Information Relating to Classes of Products
	(Unaudited)Three Months EndedJuly 31,				(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedJuly 31,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
Sales to unaffiliated customers:
Merchant steel and specialty steel sections	$	92,569,737	$	56,721,410	$	245,272,284	$	149,831,843
Fabricated bar joists and reinforcing bars		31,130,979		20,384,770		72,943,816		53,934,519
Billets		5,743,273		5,179,065		17,432,921		16,724,561
Total consolidated sales	$	129,443,989	$	82,285,245	$	335,649,021	$	220,490,923

At fiscal year-end October 31, 2001, the Company had goodwill of $13,868,647, net of accumulated amortization of $2,328,313. The Company early adopted SFAS No. 142 on November 1, 2001 and, subsequently, discontinued goodwill amortization. Based on the Company’s current reporting structure, it has determined that it operates as three reporting units and, therefore, has assigned goodwill at the operating division level. The Company completed the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test, which indicated that the Company’s goodwill was not impaired as of October 31, 2001. The Company performed annual goodwill impairment testing on May 31 of 2002, 2003 and 2004, which indicated that the Company’s goodwill was not impaired. At least quarterly, the Company will analyze whether an event has occurred that more likely than not will reduce the reporting unit’s fair value below its carrying amount and, if necessary, a goodwill impairment test will be performed between the annual dates. Impairment adjustments recognized after adoption, if any, will be recognized as operating expenses.

Note 69. ~~Supplemental~~SFAS ~~cash~~No. ~~flow~~143, ~~information:~~“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” requires that the discounted fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on November 1, 2002. Application of the statement encompasses an industrial landfill located on the site of the Company’s subsidiary, Shredded Products Corporation, which will operate for approximately thirty-four more years before closing.

	(Unaudited)Nine Months EndedJuly 31,
	2004		2003
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	2,752,900	$	4,005,271
Income taxes (net of cash received)	$	6,236,785	$	(3,556,307	)
Non cash items:
Accretion of past hedging relationships	$	323,493	$	390,359
Change in derivative financial instruments		57,114		—
Total non cash items	$	380,607	$	390,359

At April 30, 2005 and October 31, 2004, the asset retirement obligation totaled $516,936 and $498,903, respectively, and is included in other non-current liabilities. Accretion expense was $18,033 and $16,817 for the six months, and $9,017 and $8,408 for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Note 710. ~~In June 1998,~~ SFAS No. ~~133~~132 (Revised 2003), “~~Accounting~~Employers’ ~~for~~Disclosures ~~Derivative~~about ~~Instruments~~Pensions and ~~Hedging~~Other ~~Activities~~Postretirement Benefits”, ~~was~~requires ~~issued,~~disclosures ~~establishing~~about ~~standards~~the ~~for~~assets, ~~accounting~~obligations, ~~and~~cash ~~reporting~~flows ~~derivative~~and ~~instruments,~~net ~~including~~periodic ~~certain~~benefit ~~derivative~~cost ~~instruments~~of ~~embedded~~defined inbenefit ~~other~~postretirement ~~contracts,~~plans. ~~(collectively~~The ~~referred~~Company toadopted asthe ~~derivatives),~~disclosure ~~and~~requirements ~~for~~of ~~hedging~~this ~~activities.~~statement ~~Effective~~at ~~November~~October 131, ~~2000,~~2004. ~~the~~The ~~Registrant~~following ~~adopted~~table ~~the~~sets ~~policy~~forth components of ~~accounting~~net ~~and~~periodic ~~reporting~~postretirement ~~the~~benefit ~~fair~~cost ~~value~~for ofthe ~~derivatives~~three-month ~~used~~and assix-month ~~cash~~periods ~~flow~~ended ~~hedging~~April ~~activities~~30, as2005 ~~referred~~and ~~to in SFAS 133, through other comprehensive earnings.~~2004:

~~The~~Components ~~Registrant~~of ~~has~~net ~~traditionally~~periodic ~~entered~~postretirement ~~into~~benefit ~~interest~~cost ~~rate~~(other ~~swap~~benefits): and similar instruments to manage its exposure to movements in interest rates paid on corporate debt. Such instruments are matched with underlying borrowings. Pursuant to SFAS 133, to the extent the instruments are considered to be


	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	Three months ended April 30,						Six months ended April 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Service cost		—			—			—			—
Interest cost	$	22,104		$	26,053		$	44,208		$	52,106
Expected return on plan assets		—			—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		(32,074	)		(32,074	)		(64,148	)		(64,148	)
Amortization of net loss		(2,920	)		(5,873	)		(5,840	)		(11,746	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	(12,890	)	$	(11,894	)	$	(25,780	)	$	(23,788	)

Employer Contributions:

Total cash benefit payments (net of retiree contributions) for the six-month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 were $74,942 and $52,636, respectively, and for the three-month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 were $37,471 and $26,318, respectively.

~~effective,~~Note ~~changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings (loss)~~11. ToIn ~~the~~November ~~extent the instruments are considered ineffective~~2004, ~~any changes in fair value relating to~~ the ~~ineffective~~FASB ~~portion~~issued ~~are~~SFAS ~~immediately recognized in earnings (interest expense)~~No. ~~When~~151, it“Inventory isCosts ~~determined~~- ~~that a derivative ceases to be~~ an ~~effective~~amendment ~~hedge,~~of ~~the~~ARB ~~Registrant~~No. ~~discontinues hedge accounting~~43, ~~and~~Chapter ~~subsequent~~4”. ~~changes~~SFAS inNo. ~~fair~~151 ~~value~~amends of the ~~hedge~~guidance ~~instrument are recognized~~ in ~~earnings~~ARB No. ~~Historically~~43, ~~the~~Chapter ~~Registrant’s~~4, ~~interest~~“Inventory ~~rate swap agreements have been 100% effective and~~Pricing,” ~~therefore,~~to ~~changes~~clarify inthe ~~fair~~accounting ~~value~~for ~~have~~abnormal ~~been~~amounts ~~recorded as a component~~ of ~~other~~idle ~~comprehensive~~facility ~~earnings (loss). As of April 1~~expense, ~~2002~~freight, ~~the~~handling ~~Registrant effected an early termination~~costs, orand ~~unwind,~~wasted ofmaterial ~~its~~(spoilage) ~~interest~~and ~~rate~~requires ~~swap~~these ~~agreements,~~costs ~~resulting~~be intreated ~~the~~as ~~conversion~~current ofperiod ~~fixed-rate~~charges. ~~debt~~In ~~into~~addition, ~~variable-rate~~SFAS ~~borrowings~~No. ~~This~~ ~~swap~~151 ~~unwind~~requires ~~created~~that aallocation ~~termination fee~~ of ~~$3,000,179~~fixed ~~due~~production ~~the~~overheads ~~Lender,~~ to ~~be paid over~~ the ~~remaining~~costs ~~term~~ of ~~the~~conversion ~~debt.~~be ~~For~~based ~~the~~on ~~nine months ended July 31, 2004 and 2003,~~ the ~~reclassification,~~normal ~~and~~capacity ~~subsequent amortization/accretion,~~ of ~~these past hedging relationships resulted in~~ the ~~Registrant~~production ~~recording~~facilities. anThe ~~after-tax~~provisions ~~earnings adjustment~~ of ~~$323,493~~SFAS ~~and $390,359, respectively, through other comprehensive earnings (loss)~~No. ~~For~~151 ~~the~~are ~~quarters~~effective ~~ended~~for ~~July~~inventory ~~31,~~costs ~~2004~~incurred ~~and~~during ~~2003,~~fiscal ~~these~~years beginning after~~-tax~~ ~~earnings adjustments~~June ~~totaled $102~~15,~~856~~ ~~and $125,794, respectively~~2005. ~~Due~~The toCompany ~~fluctuations~~is incurrently ~~interest~~evaluating ~~rates and volatility in market expectations,~~ the ~~fair~~impact ~~market value~~ of ~~interest~~SFAS ~~rate swap instruments can be expected to appreciate or depreciate over time~~No. ~~The Registrant~~151 ~~plans~~on ~~to continue~~ its ~~practice~~financial ~~of economically hedging various components of its debt. However~~position, asresults ~~a result~~ of ~~SFAS~~operations ~~133,~~and ~~such swap instruments may now create volatility in future reported earnings or other comprehensive earnings (loss)~~liquidity.

~~The~~Note ~~Registrant~~12. ~~has~~In ~~entered~~December ~~into~~2004, ~~one-year~~the orFASB ~~less~~issued ~~derivative commodity~~SFAS ~~instruments~~No. to153, ~~minimize~~“Exchange ~~the exposure~~ of ~~price~~Nonmonetary ~~risk~~Assets, ~~related~~an toamendment ~~certain~~of ~~natural~~APB ~~gas~~Opinion ~~purchases~~No. ~~used~~29”. inSFAS ~~the manufacturing process at the West Virginia facility~~No. ~~The~~153 ~~contracts~~replaces ~~used to mitigate~~ the ~~price~~exception ~~risk~~from ~~related~~fair tovalue ~~natural~~measurement ~~gas~~included ~~purchases were~~in ~~designated~~APB asOpinion ~~effective~~No. ~~cash~~29 ~~flow hedges~~ for anonmonetary ~~portion~~exchanges of ~~the~~similar ~~natural~~productive ~~gas~~assets ~~usage~~with ~~over~~a ~~the~~general ~~periods~~exception infrom ~~the~~fair ~~agreements.~~value ~~Unrealized~~measurement ~~gains~~for ~~and~~exchanges ~~losses~~of ~~associated~~nonmonetary ~~with~~assets ~~marking~~that ~~the~~do ~~contracts~~not tohave ~~market~~commercial ~~are~~substance. ~~recorded~~A asnonmonetary aexchange ~~component~~has ofcommercial ~~other~~substance ~~comprehensive earnings~~if ~~(loss) and included in~~ the ~~stockholders’~~future ~~equity~~cash ~~section~~flows of the ~~balance~~entity ~~sheet as part of accumulated comprehensive earnings (loss). These gains and losses~~ are ~~recognized~~expected into ~~earnings~~change insignificantly ~~the~~as ~~month~~a inresult ~~which~~of the ~~related~~exchange. ~~natural~~This ~~gas~~statement iswill ~~used, or~~be inapplied ~~the~~prospectively ~~month~~and ~~a hedge~~ is ~~determined~~effective tofor benonmonetary ~~ineffective.~~asset ~~For~~exchanges ~~the~~occurring ~~quarter~~in ~~and~~fiscal ~~nine~~periods ~~months~~beginning ~~ended~~after ~~July~~June 3115, ~~2004,~~2005. ~~the~~The ~~Registrant~~Company ~~recorded~~does annot ~~after-tax~~believe ~~loss~~adoption ~~adjustment~~ of ~~$(12,729)~~this ~~and~~statement anwill ~~after-tax~~have ~~earnings~~a ~~adjustment~~material ofimpact ~~$57,114,~~on ~~respectively,~~the ~~through other~~Company’s ~~comprehensive~~results ~~earnings~~of ~~(loss),~~operations ~~related~~or tofinancial ~~future transactions, which are expected to be recognized in earnings within the respective contract term~~condition.

Note 813. AtIn ~~fiscal~~March ~~year-end~~2005, ~~October~~FIN 3147, ~~2001,~~“Accounting ~~the~~for ~~Registrant~~Conditional ~~had~~Asset ~~goodwill~~Retirement ofObligations ~~$13,868,647,~~- ~~net~~an Interpretation of ~~accumulated~~SFAS ~~amortization~~No. ~~of $2~~143”,~~328,313~~ was issued. ~~The~~This ~~Registrant~~interpretation ~~early~~clarifies ~~adopted~~that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation”, as used in SFAS No. ~~142~~143, “~~Goodwill~~Accounting ~~and~~for ~~Other~~Asset ~~Intangible~~Retirement ~~Assets~~Obligations”, onrefers ~~November~~to 1,a ~~2001~~legal ~~and,~~obligation ~~subsequently,~~to ~~discontinued~~perform ~~goodwill~~an ~~amortization.~~asset ~~Based~~retirement onactivity ~~the~~in ~~Registrant’s~~which ~~current~~the ~~reporting~~timing ~~structure,~~and it(or) ~~has~~method ~~determined~~of ~~that~~settlement itare ~~operates~~conditional ason ~~three~~a ~~reporting~~future ~~units~~event ~~and,~~that ~~therefore,~~may ~~has~~or ~~assigned~~may ~~goodwill~~not atbe within the ~~operating~~control ~~division~~of ~~level~~the entity. ~~The~~Accordingly, ~~Registrant~~an ~~completed~~entity ~~the~~is ~~first~~required ~~step~~to ofrecognize ~~the~~a ~~initial~~liability ~~transitional~~for ~~goodwill~~the ~~impairment~~fair ~~test,~~value ~~which~~of ~~indicated~~a ~~that~~conditional ~~the~~asset ~~Registrant’s~~retirement ~~goodwill~~obligation ~~was~~if ~~not~~the ~~impaired~~fair asvalue of ~~October~~the ~~31,~~liability ~~2001.~~can Inbe ~~addition,~~reasonably ~~the~~estimated. ~~Registrant~~This ~~performed~~Interpretation ~~annual~~is ~~goodwill~~effective ~~impairment~~no ~~testing~~later ~~during~~than the ~~third~~end ~~quarter~~ of ~~2002,~~fiscal ~~2003~~years ~~and~~ending ~~2004~~after December 15, ~~which~~2005. ~~indicated~~Retrospective ~~that~~application ~~the~~for ~~Registrant’s~~interim ~~goodwill~~financial ~~was~~information is permitted but is not ~~impaired~~required. The ~~carrying~~Company ~~value~~is still evaluating the impact that adoption of ~~goodwill~~this isInterpretation ~~periodically~~will ~~reviewed~~have ~~based~~on ~~upon~~the anCompany’s ~~assessment~~results of operations ofor ~~the~~financial ~~acquired entity~~condition.

Note 914. InAt ~~June~~April ~~2001~~30, ~~SFAS No. 143~~2005, ~~“Accounting~~the ~~for~~Company ~~Asset~~was ~~Retirement~~committed ~~Obligations”,~~for ~~was issued~~$4,106,011 ~~addressing financial accounting and reporting~~ for ~~obligations~~purchases ~~associated with the retirement~~ of ~~tangible~~equipment ~~long-lived assets~~ and ~~associated~~production ~~costs~~facilities. SFAS 143 requires that the discounted fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as a part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The provisions of SFAS 143 became effective with the Registrant’s

The Company is not involved in any legal proceedings or environmental matters outside the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, amounts accrued for potential awards or assessments in connection with these matters at this time are adequate, and the outcome of such environmental and legal concerns currently pending will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company reassesses these matters as new facts and cases are brought to management’s attention.

~~adoption~~ Item ~~of the statement on November 1, 2002~~2. ~~Application of the statement encompasses an industrial landfill located on the site of the Registrant~~Management’s ~~subsidiary,~~Discussion ~~Shredded~~and ~~Products~~Analysis ~~Corporation,~~of ~~which~~Financial ~~will~~Condition ~~operate~~and ~~for~~Results ~~another~~of ~~thirty~~Operations ~~to thirty-five years before closing.~~

~~The~~FORWARD-LOOKING ~~effect~~STATEMENTS of adopting a new accounting principle on net earnings and the related per share amounts is required to be shown on the face of the statement of earnings for all periods presented under APB No. 20, “Accounting Changes”.

OnFrom ~~November~~time 1,to ~~2002~~time, the ~~date~~Company ofmay ~~adoption~~publish forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, anbusiness ~~asset~~prospects, ~~retirement~~technological developments, ~~obligation~~new ~~for~~products, ~~landfill~~research ~~closure~~and development activities and ~~post~~similar ~~closure~~matters. ~~costs~~The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of ~~$433,902~~1995 ~~was~~provides ~~recorded,~~a ~~compared~~safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the ~~associated~~terms ~~long-lived~~of ~~asset~~the safe harbor, the ~~net~~Company notes that a variety of ~~accumulated~~factors could cause the Company’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks ~~depreciation~~and ofuncertainties ~~$205~~that may affect the operations,~~492.~~ ~~This~~performance, ~~resulted~~development inand aresults ~~cumulative~~of ~~effect~~the Company’s business include economic and industry conditions, availability and prices of ~~adopting~~utilities, ~~this~~supplies ~~statement~~and raw materials, prices of ~~$228~~steel products,~~410~~ foreign and domestic competition, foreign trade policies affecting imports and exports, governmental regulations, interest rates, inflation, labor relations, environmental concerns and compliance issues, and others.

AtOVERVIEW July 31, 2004, the asset retirement obligation totaled $490,495 and is included in other non-current liabilities. The periods’ changes in the obligation consisted of both liabilities incurred and accretion expense of $25,226 and $8,409 for the nine months and three months of 2004, and $23,525 for both the nine months and three months of 2003, respectively.

~~Note~~During ~~10.~~our In2004 ~~April~~fiscal ~~2002,~~year ~~SFAS~~and ~~No.~~for ~~145,~~the ~~“Rescission~~six ofmonths ~~SFAS~~ended ~~Nos.~~April 430, 442005, ~~and~~the ~~64,~~Company ~~Amendment~~reported ofnet ~~SFAS~~earnings ~~No.~~of 13$30,446,248 and ~~Technical Corrections”~~$15, ~~was issued~~768, ~~rescinding SFAS 4 which required that all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt be aggregated~~055, respectively. ~~and~~The ifsteel ~~material,~~industry ~~classified~~ as ana ~~extraordinary~~whole ~~item.~~has Asexperienced a ~~result,~~very ~~gains~~robust ~~and~~period ~~loses from debt extinguishment are to be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria set forth~~ in ~~APB~~terms ~~No.~~of 30earnings. ~~SFAS~~The ~~145~~Company ~~also~~was ~~requires~~able ~~that sale-leaseback accounting be used for capital lease modifications with economic effects similar~~ to ~~sale-leaseback~~increase ~~transactions.~~its ~~The~~profit ~~Registrant’s~~margins ~~November~~in 1,a ~~2002~~period ~~adoption and implementation~~ of ~~SFAS~~rapidly ~~145~~rising ~~had~~costs noand ~~significant~~pricing ~~effect~~environment, onas ~~its~~discussed ~~results~~more offully ~~operations or financial condition~~below.

~~Note~~The ~~11.~~Company Inis ~~July~~a ~~2002,~~domestic ~~SFAS~~steel Nomanufacturing company. ~~146~~The Company, ~~“Accounting~~directly and ~~for~~through ~~Costs~~its ~~Associated~~subsidiaries, ~~with~~is ~~Exit~~engaged orin ~~Disposal~~the ~~Activities”~~manufacturing, ~~was~~fabricating ~~issued,~~and ~~requiring~~marketing ~~companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date~~ of amerchant ~~commitment~~steel toproducts, anspecialty ~~exit~~steel ~~or disposal plan. SFAS 146 replaces EITF No. 94-3~~sections, ~~“Liability~~billets ~~Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits~~ and ~~Other~~open-web ~~Costs~~steel tojoists. ~~Exit~~Each ansubsidiary ~~Activity~~is ~~(including~~either ~~Certain Costs Incurred in~~ a ~~Restructuring)”.~~supplier ~~SFAS 146 is~~ to bethe ~~applied~~parent ~~prospectively~~company ~~to exit~~ or ~~disposal~~a purchaser ~~activities~~of ~~initiated~~its ~~after~~finished ~~December~~product ~~31,~~and ~~2002~~billets. The ~~adoption~~Company ofsells ~~SFAS~~its ~~146~~products ~~has~~through ~~not~~its ~~had~~sales aforce ~~material~~to ~~impact~~our oncustomers, ~~the~~which ~~Registrant’s~~include ~~results~~service ofcenters, ~~operations~~original orequipment ~~financial~~manufacturers, ~~condition~~and fabricators.

~~Note~~Roanoke ~~12.~~Electric InSteel ~~November 2002~~Corporation, the ~~FASB~~parent ~~issued~~company, ~~FASB~~is ~~Interpretation~~a ~~(“FIN”)~~state-of-the-art 45steel mini-mill located in Roanoke, ~~“Guarantor’s~~Virginia. ~~Accounting~~This facility melts scrap steel in electric furnaces and ~~Disclosure~~continuously ~~Requirements~~casts ~~for~~the ~~Guarantees,~~molten ~~including~~steel ~~Indirect~~into ~~Guarantees~~billets. These billets are rolled into merchant steel products consisting of ~~Indebtedness~~angles, plain rounds, flats and channels of various ~~Others”.~~lengths Itand ~~clarifies~~sizes. ~~that~~Excess asteel ~~guarantor~~billet production is ~~required~~sold to ~~recognize,~~mills atwithout ~~the~~sufficient ~~inception~~melting capacities or facilities. Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation markets its products to steel service centers and fabricators. Steel of aWest ~~guarantee~~Virginia, Inc., athrough ~~liability~~its ~~for~~subsidiary, ~~the~~SWVA, ~~fair~~Inc., ~~value~~is ofa ~~the~~steel ~~obligation~~mini-mill ~~undertaken~~and steel fabricating facility operating in ~~issuing~~Huntington, ~~the~~West ~~guarantee~~Virginia. A steel fabricating subsidiary, ~~including~~Marshall ~~its~~Steel, ~~ongoing~~Inc., ~~obligation~~is tolocated ~~stand~~in ~~ready~~Memphis, toTennessee. ~~perform~~These ~~over~~locations ~~the~~produce ~~term~~or fabricate ofspecialty ~~the~~steel ~~guarantee~~sections and custom-finished products and serve niche markets. Shredded Products Corp., a subsidiary with operations in ~~the~~Rocky ~~event~~Mount ~~that~~and ~~the~~Montvale, ~~specified~~Virginia, ~~triggering~~extracts ~~events~~scrap orsteel ~~conditions~~and ~~occur~~other metals from junked automobiles and other waste materials. ~~The~~These ~~objective~~facilities ofsupply the ~~initial~~parent ~~measurement~~company with a substantial amount of ~~the~~its ~~liability~~raw ismaterials. ~~the~~Nonferrous ~~fair~~metals ~~value~~generated ofin the ~~guarantee~~process atare ~~its~~sold ~~inception~~to unrelated customers. ~~The~~John ~~initial~~W. ~~recognition~~Hancock, Jr., Incorporated and ~~initial~~Socar, ~~measurement~~Inc. ~~provisions~~are steel offabrication ~~FIN~~subsidiaries 45located ~~are~~in ~~effective~~Salem, onVirginia, aFlorence, ~~prospective~~South ~~basis~~Carolina and Continental, Ohio. All three operations purchase rounds and angles from the parent company to ~~guarantees~~fabricate ~~issued~~steel orjoists ~~amended~~and ~~after~~joist ~~December~~girders. ~~31,~~These ~~2002~~joists and joist girders are used as horizontal supports for floors and roofs in commercial and industrial buildings. The ~~Registrant~~Hancock ~~will~~facility ~~record~~also ~~the~~manufactures ~~fair~~structural ~~value~~pallet ofrack ~~future~~and ~~material~~structural ~~guarantees~~cantilever rack. This rack is used for heavy storage in retail, warehouses ifand ~~any~~distribution centers. ~~The~~RESCO ~~adoption~~Steel ofProducts ~~FIN~~Corporation, 45a ~~had~~Salem, noVirginia ~~significant~~based ~~impact~~subsidiary, fabricated concrete reinforcing steel by cutting and bending it to contractor specifications, until its sale on ~~the~~January ~~Registrant’s~~27, ~~results~~2005 of(see ~~operations~~Note or1 ~~financial~~- Discontinued ~~condition~~Operations).

~~Note~~ECONOMIC ~~13.~~FACTORS InAND ~~January~~STEEL INDUSTRY ~~2003,~~TRENDS ~~FIN~~AFFECTING ~~46,~~OPERATING ~~“Consolidation~~RESULTS of Variable Interest Entities - an Interpretation of ARB No. 51”, was issued (revised December 2003). This interpretation provides guidance related to identifying variable interest entities (previously known as special purpose entities or SPEs) and determining whether such entities should be consolidated. This interpretation must be applied

The Company’s sales are predominantly affected by the volume of products shipped to customers, the corresponding mix of products shipped and the associated sales prices of each product. These factors can be significantly impacted by general economic conditions, industry trends and competitive pressures. The Company has limited pricing power and in general prices will rise or fall based on market forces. The cost of the Company’s main raw material, scrap steel, is also based on market forces.

~~immediately~~All todirect ~~variable~~and ~~interest~~indirect ~~entities~~manufacturing ~~created~~costs orare ~~obtained~~included ~~after~~in ~~January~~cost 31of sales. The principle elements of cost of sales are raw materials, ~~2003~~labor and benefits (including profit sharing), ~~however~~and ~~certain~~energy. ~~provisions~~The primary components of ~~the~~raw ~~interpretation~~materials ~~were~~include ~~deferred~~scrap ~~until~~and other additives, the ~~period~~costs ~~ending~~of ~~after~~which ~~March~~are 15demand driven, ~~2004~~and can be affected by available supply and inflationary pressures. The ~~Registrant~~steel ~~does~~industry ~~not~~initiated ~~have~~a ~~any~~number ~~variable~~of ~~interest~~scrap ~~entities,~~surcharges and base-price increases during the ~~adoption~~past year due to the increased cost of ~~this~~scrap ~~interpretation~~steel. ~~did~~Labor ~~not~~and ~~have~~benefit ancosts ~~affect~~are oninfluenced mainly by production and shipment levels. Profit sharing expenses are related to the ~~Registrant~~Company’s ~~results~~various plans’ contributions which represent a percentage of ~~operations~~earnings or ~~financial~~IRS ~~condition~~limitations. Energy costs are associated with the Company’s utilization of both electricity and natural gas as its power sources, with electric arc furnaces using electricity and with reheat furnaces using natural gas. The arc furnaces are used in the actual melting of scrap steel (to produce billets), while the reheat furnaces are used to reheat the billets which are then rolled into a finished product. The availability of this power supply and the peak demands by the Company determine energy pricing.

~~Note~~INCOME ~~14.~~STATEMENT InCLASSIFICATIONS April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The Statement amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS 133. The amendments set forth in SFAS 149 improve financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except for certain outlined exceptions. The adoption of SFAS 149 did not have a material impact on the Registrant’s results of operations or financial condition.

~~Note~~Sales 15. As of May 1, 2003, the Registrant adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity,” including the deferral of certain effective dates as a result of the provisions of FASB Staff Position 150-3, “Effective Date, Disclosures, and Transition for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Under FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” ” The Registrant does not believe it has any financial instruments included within the scope of SFAS 150 and, therefore, the adoption has not had a material impact on the Registrant’s results of operations or financial condition.

Note 16. In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.” When adopted, FSP 106-2 will supersede FSP 106-1, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” which was issued in January 2004 and permitted a sponsor of a postretirement health care plan that provides a prescription drug benefit to make a one-time election to defer accounting for the effects of the Act until more authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy was issued. The ~~Registrant~~Company’s ~~elected~~sales ~~the~~are ~~one-time deferral allowed under FSP 106-1 and as~~ a ~~result~~factor ~~any measures~~ of ~~the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and~~ net ~~periodic~~tons ~~postretirement benefit cost in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the period ended July 31~~shipped, ~~2004~~product ~~did~~mix ~~not reflect the effects of the Act. FSP 106-2 requires the Registrant to assess the impact of the federal subsidy on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation~~ and ~~net~~related ~~periodic postretirement benefit cost~~pricing. ~~FSP~~Sales ~~106-2~~are isdetermined ~~effective~~by ~~beginning~~subtracting inproduct ~~the~~returns, ~~Registrant’s~~sales ~~quarter ending July 31~~discounts, ~~2004.~~return ~~The~~allowances ~~Registrant is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of FSP 106-2~~ and ~~has~~claims ~~not~~from ~~yet~~total ~~determined the effect of adoption on its results of operations or financial condition~~sales.

~~Note~~Cost ~~17. At July 31, 2004, the Registrant was committed for $1,060,000 for purchases~~ of ~~equipment~~Sales ~~and production facilities.~~

The ~~Registrant~~Company’s iscost ~~not~~of ~~involved~~sales inrepresent ~~any~~all ~~legal~~direct ~~proceedings~~and orindirect ~~environmental matters~~costs ~~outside~~associated with the manufacture ~~ordinary course~~ of ~~business~~our products. InThe ~~the~~principal ~~opinion~~elements of ~~management, amounts accrued for potential awards or assessments in connection with~~ these ~~matters~~costs atare ~~this~~steel ~~time~~scrap, ~~are~~alloys, ~~adequate~~electrodes, ~~and~~labor ~~the outcome of such environmental~~ and ~~legal~~benefits ~~concerns currently~~(including ~~pending~~profit ~~will~~sharing), ~~not have a material effect on the Registrant’s consolidated financial position~~energy, ~~results of operations~~depreciation, ~~or cash flows. The Registrant reassesses these matters as new facts~~ and ~~cases are brought to management’s attention~~freight.

Other Operating Expenses (Income)

The Company’s other operating expenses are composed of four main areas. Administrative expenses consist of costs associated with our sales, finance and accounting, and administrative departments. These costs include labor and benefits, professional services, certain insurance expenses and various property taxes. Interest expense consists of interest and financing cost amortization associated with our credit facilities. Profit sharing expenses are related to the Company’s various plans’ contributions which represent a percentage of earnings or IRS limitations. Other income includes interest income and the 2004 antitrust litigation settlement, which is due to partial settlements received in conjunction with a class action suit for antitrust violations against the Company’s graphite electrode suppliers.

The following table sets forth amounts from the consolidated statements of earnings along with the dollar and percentage ~~REPORT~~change OFfor ~~INDEPENDENT~~the ~~REGISTERED~~six-month ~~PUBLIC~~period ~~ACCOUNTING~~ended ~~FIRM~~April 30, 2005 compared with April 30, 2004:

Board of Directors and Stockholders


	(Unaudited) Six Months Ended April 30,
	2005			2004			$ Inc (Dec)			% Inc (Dec)
Sales	$	269,178,437		$	201,186,556		$	67,991,881		33.8	%

Costs:
Cost of sales		218,130,475			173,546,548			44,583,927		25.7	%
Profit sharing		4,951,105			3,033,092			1,918,013		63.2	%

Total costs		223,081,580			176,579,640			46,501,940		26.3	%

Gross earnings		46,096,857			24,606,916			21,489,941		87.3	%

Other operating expenses (income):
Administrative expenses		16,026,590			13,709,669			2,316,921		16.9	%
Interest expense		1,793,270			1,932,608			(139,338	)	-7.2	%
Profit sharing		1,185,545			711,467			474,078		66.6	%
Interest income		(47,244	)		(132,710	)		85,466		64.4	%
Antitrust settlement income		—			(3,061,820	)		3,061,820		100.0	%

Total other operating expenses		18,958,161			13,159,214			5,798,947		44.1	%

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		27,138,696			11,447,702			15,690,994		137.1	%
Income tax expense		10,693,000			4,573,232			6,119,768		133.8	%

Earnings from continuing operations		16,445,696			6,874,470			9,571,226		139.2	%

Discontinuted operations:
Loss from operations before income taxes		(1,118,263	)		(197,896	)		(920,367	)	-465.1	%
Income tax benefit		(440,622	)		(79,158	)		(361,464	)	-456.6	%

Loss on discontinued operations		(677,641	)		(118,738	)		(558,903	)	-470.7	%

Net earnings	$	15,768,055		$	6,755,732		$	9,012,323		133.4	%

~~Roanoke~~The ~~Electric~~following ~~Steel~~table ~~Corporation~~sets forth amounts from the consolidated statements of earnings along with the dollar and percentage change for the three-month period ended April 30, 2005 compared with April 30, 2004:

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) as of July 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, and of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management.


	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended April 30,
	2005			2004			$ Inc (Dec)			% Inc (Dec)
Sales	$	137,868,454		$	116,012,871		$	21,855,583		18.8	%

Costs:
Cost of sales		115,416,009			97,045,170			18,370,839		18.9	%
Profit sharing		2,093,723			2,223,586			(129,863	)	-5.8	%

Total costs		117,509,732			99,268,756			18,240,976		18.4	%

Gross earnings		20,358,722			16,744,115			3,614,607		21.6	%

Other operating expenses (income):
Administrative expenses		8,182,154			6,743,876			1,438,278		21.3	%
Interest expense		942,067			809,670			132,397		16.4	%
Profit sharing		491,120			521,582			(30,462	)	-5.8	%
Interest income		(25,262	)		(57,454	)		32,192		56.0	%

Total other operating expenses		9,590,079			8,017,674			1,572,405		19.6	%

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes		10,768,643			8,726,441			2,042,202		23.4	%
Income tax expense		4,186,462			3,488,615			697,847		20.0	%

Earnings from continuing operations		6,582,181			5,237,826			1,344,355		25.7	%

Discontinuted operations:
Loss from operations before income taxes		—			(26,283	)		26,283		100.0	%
Income tax benefit		—			(10,513	)		10,513		100.0	%

Loss on discontinued operations		—			(15,770	)		15,770		100.0	%

Net earnings	$	6,582,181		$	5,222,056		$	1,360,125		26.0	%

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated December 8, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, on November 1, 2002. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

August 24, 2004

~~PART~~RESULTS IOF -OPERATIONS ~~ITEM 2~~

~~MANAGEMENT’S~~Sales ~~DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS~~

OFSales ~~FINANCIAL~~for ~~CONDITION~~the ~~AND~~six ~~RESULTS~~months OFincreased ~~OPERATIONS~~by 33.8%, mainly, as a result of improvements in product mix and higher average selling prices per ton for merchant bar products of 29.6%, specialty steel sections of 30.9%, fabricated products of 47.2% and billets of 33.9%. Sales for the three months increased by 18.8%, primarily, due to better product mix and higher average selling prices per ton for merchant bar products of 17.5%, specialty steel sections of 22.2%, fabricated products of 49.1% and billets of 20.7%. Increased tons shipped for billets also contributed to the sales improvement for both periods. For the six month periods, tons shipped of bar and specialty products dropped, while fabricated product shipment levels were flat. For the three month periods, bar, specialty and fabricated product shipment tons decreased, negatively impacting sales. Improved product mix and favorable competitive conditions within several market segments, brought higher average selling prices for specialty steel sections during both periods. A softening in demand within a single market segment offset improvements in other segments, causing reduced shipment levels of specialty steel products of 1.5% and 9.3% for the six month and three month periods, respectively. Fabricated product selling prices increased for both periods, influenced mainly by higher raw material costs. Fabricated product shipment levels dropped by 23.5% during the quarter, while remaining flat for the six months, primarily due to reduced activity and increased competitive conditions within the nonresidential construction segment. The six month improvement in merchant bar product selling prices was due mainly to a 22.4% rise in the cost of scrap steel, our main raw material, which prompted several industry-wide price increases. A 3.4% drop in the three month cost of scrap steel caused bar prices to trend lower, even though mill prices remained higher in the 2005 quarter. More cautious buying patterns and excess inventory levels at steel service centers caused temporary reductions of 5.1% and 4.4% in tons shipped of bar products during the six months and three months, respectively, although market conditions continued to be strong. Billet selling prices increased, as sharp rises in scrap prices triggered changes in billet prices. Improved demand and lower excess billet availability in the market resulted in the 34.1% and 45.8% increased billet shipments for the six month and three month periods, respectively.

~~The~~Cost ~~following~~of isSales ~~management’s discussion~~ and ~~analysis~~Gross ofMargins ~~certain significant factors which have affected the Registrant’s earnings during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings (loss).~~

ACost of ~~summary~~sales increased by 26.3% during the first six months, mainly, as a result of the ~~period~~increased tobillet ~~period~~tons ~~changes~~shipped, together with the higher costs of scrap steel and other raw materials and a 63.2% increase in profit sharing costs (see the ~~principal~~discussion on ~~items~~profit ~~included~~sharing plans below), even though bar and specialty product shipments declined. Cost of sales increased by 18.4% for the quarter, primarily, due to increased billet shipments, together with higher raw material costs, in spite of lower scrap steel cost, a 5.8% decline in profit sharing costs, and reduced shipment levels for each product class mentioned above. Repairs and maintenance expense increased from $11,751,667 to $15,334,924 for the ~~consolidated~~first ~~statements~~six months of 2004 and 2005, respectively, and from $6,298,766 to $7,739,179 for the second quarter of 2004 and 2005, respectively, due to required equipment repair needs. The Company has no significant deferred maintenance and believes its facilities are operating within reasonable productive capacities. Gross earnings ~~(loss)~~as isa ~~shown~~percentage ~~below:~~of sales increased from 12.2% to 17.1% for the six months compared, primarily, as a result of the higher selling prices for all product classes, coupled with the effects of increased raw steel production levels on fixed costs, which more than offset higher scrap costs, together with lower margins for billets. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased from 14.4% to 14.8% for the three months compared, mainly, due to the higher selling prices for all product classes and lower scrap steel cost barely offsetting lower margins for billets and the effects of reduced mill production levels on fixed costs.

	Comparison of Increases (Decreases)
	Three Months EndedJuly 31,2004 and 2003				Nine Months EndedJuly 31,2004 and 2003
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
Sales	47,158,744		57.3		115,158,098		52.2
Cost of sales	27,477,156		36.1		74,605,978		36.1
Administrative expenses	2,650,806		48.5		6,340,595		38.9
Interest expense	(475,452	)	(38.1	)	(1,181,740	)	(31.5	)
Profit sharing expense	4,043,966		5,392.0		7,583,651		3,291.5
Antitrust settlement income	—		—		2,540,860		487.7
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	13,462,268		2,510.2		30,350,474		491.5
Income tax expense (benefit)	5,385,154		2,484.7		12,139,919		490.0
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	8,077,114		2,527.5		18,210,555		492.5
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	—		—		228,410		100.0
Net earnings (loss)	8,077,114		2,527.5		18,438,965		469.7

Administrative Expenses

~~FORWARD~~Administrative expenses increased 16.9% for the six month period and 21.3% for the three month period, mainly, due to increased executive and other management compensation of $2,792,283 and $1,589,864, and higher expenses for directors’ retirement costs of $870,803 and $0, directors’ fees of $81,000 and $10,000 and charitable contributions of $141,637 and $49,361, which more than offset declines in professional fees of $479,842 and $161,285 (most in relation to the timing of work associated with the Sarbanes-~~LOOKING~~Oxley ~~STATEMENTS~~Act), insurance expense of $623,212 and $616,588 and bad debt expense of $662,378 and $311,104 for the six month and three month periods, respectively. The above mentioned retirement costs related to a directors’ retirement plan which was amended and restated near the beginning of the second quarter of 2005. Administrative expenses, as a percentage of sales, dropped from 6.8% to 6.0% for the six month period, as a result of the improvement in sales, but climbed from 5.8% to 5.9% for the three month period, as expenses outpaced the improved sales.

From time to time, the Registrant may publish forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Registrant notes that a variety of factors could cause the Registrant’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Registrant’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Registrant’s business include economic

~~and~~Interest ~~industry~~Expense conditions, timing of the recovery within our steel markets, availability and prices of utilities, supplies and raw materials, prices of steel products, foreign and domestic competition, foreign trade policies affecting imports and exports, governmental regulations, interest rates, inflation, labor relations, environmental concerns and compliance issues, and others.

~~OVERVIEW~~Interest expense decreased 7.2% for the six months, primarily, due to reduced average borrowings and lower average interest rates. Interest expense increased 16.4% for the three months, mainly, as a result of slightly higher average interest rates offsetting lower average borrowings. In October 2004, the Company entered into a new five-year loan agreement with its banking syndicate. The new facility provides for a long-term revolving loan of up to $55,000,000 and a term loan of $30,000,000.

The ~~Registrant,~~loans ~~directly~~bear ~~and~~interest ~~through~~at ~~its subsidiaries, is engaged in~~ the ~~manufacturing, fabricating~~Company’s ~~and~~option ~~marketing~~at of(i) ~~merchant steel products~~one, ~~specialty steel sections~~two, ~~billets~~three, ~~open-web~~six ~~steel~~or, ~~joists~~if ~~and~~available, ~~reinforcing~~nine ~~bars.~~or ~~Each~~twelve ~~subsidiary~~month isLIBOR ~~either~~as aselected ~~supplier~~by to the ~~parent~~Company, ~~company~~ or a(ii) ~~purchaser~~the ofgreater ~~its finished product and billets. The main plant~~ of ~~Roanoke~~(A) ~~Electric Steel Corporation is a state-of-~~the~~-art~~ ~~steel~~prime ~~mini-mill~~rate ~~located~~publicly inannounced ~~Roanoke,~~from ~~Virginia.~~time ~~This~~to ~~facility~~time ~~melts~~by ~~scrap steel in electric furnaces and continuously casts~~ the ~~molten steel into billets. These billets are rolled~~ ~~into~~loans ~~merchant~~administrative ~~steel products consisting of angles~~agent, ~~plain rounds, flats, channels and reinforcing bars of various lengths and sizes. Excess steel billet production is sold to mills without sufficient melting capacities~~ or ~~facilities.~~(B) ~~Roanoke~~the ~~Electric Steel~~effective ~~Corporation~~federal ~~markets~~funds ~~its~~rate ~~products~~quoted toby ~~steel~~the ~~service~~Federal ~~centers~~Reserve ~~and~~Bank ~~fabricators. Steel~~ of ~~West~~New ~~Virginia,~~York ~~Inc.,~~plus ~~through~~1/2 ~~its~~of ~~subsidiary, SWVA, Inc~~1%., isThe aterm ~~steel~~loan ~~mini-mill~~requires ~~and~~quarterly ~~steel~~payments ~~fabricating~~of ~~facility~~principal ~~operating~~ in ~~Huntington,~~the ~~West~~amount ~~Virginia.~~of ~~A steel fabricating subsidiary~~$1, ~~Marshall Steel~~500,000 ~~Inc.,~~plus ~~is located in Memphis~~interest, ~~Tennessee. These locations produce or fabricate specialty steel sections~~ and ~~custom-finished~~the ~~products and serve niche markets. Shredded Products Corporation, a subsidiary with~~revolving ~~operations~~loan inrequires ~~Rocky~~quarterly ~~Mount~~payments ~~and~~of ~~Montvale,~~interest ~~Virginia,~~until ~~extracts scrap steel and other metals from junked automobiles and other waste materials. These facilities supply~~ the ~~main~~fifth ~~plant~~anniversary ~~with a substantial amount~~ of ~~its~~the ~~raw~~credit ~~materials.~~facility ~~Nonferrous~~at ~~metals generated~~which intime the ~~process~~outstanding ~~are~~principal ~~sold~~balance toof unrelated customers. John W. Hancock, Jr., Inc. and Socar, Inc. are steel fabrication subsidiaries located in Salem, Virginia, Florence, South Carolina and Continental, Ohio. All three operations purchase rounds and angles from the ~~main~~revolving ~~plant~~loan tomust ~~fabricate~~be ~~steel~~paid ~~joists and joist girders. These joists and joist girders are used as horizontal supports for floors and roofs~~ in ~~commercial and industrial buildings~~full. ~~RESCO Steel Products Corporation, a Salem, Virginia based subsidiary, fabricates concrete reinforcing steel by cutting and bending it to contractor specifications.~~

~~ECONOMIC~~Profit ~~FACTORS~~Sharing ~~AND~~Expense ~~STEEL INDUSTRY TRENDS AFFECTING OPERATING RESULTS~~

~~The~~Contributions ~~Registrant’s~~to ~~sales~~various ~~are~~profit ~~predominantly~~sharing ~~affected~~plans byare ~~the~~determined ~~volume~~as a proportion of ~~products~~earnings ~~shipped~~before toincome taxes and should normally increase or decrease with earnings. ~~customers~~During the 2005 first half, each of the ~~corresponding~~sponsoring ~~mix~~companies accrued benefits under their respective plans as a result of ~~products~~current ~~shipped~~earnings, ~~and~~producing an increase of 66.6% from the ~~associated~~2004 ~~sales~~levels ~~prices~~as a result of ~~each~~improved ~~product~~profitability. ~~These~~Profit ~~factors~~sharing expense ~~can~~decreased be5.8% ~~significantly~~for ~~impacted~~the byquarter ~~general~~compared, ~~economic conditions~~mainly, ~~industry~~due ~~trends~~to ~~and~~one ~~competitive~~plan ~~pressures~~accruing benefits at lower rates in 2005.

~~All~~Interest ~~direct~~Income and indirect manufacturing costs are included in cost of sales. The principle elements of cost of sales are raw materials, labor and energy. The primary components of raw materials include scrap and other additives, the costs of which are demand driven, and can be affected by available supply and inflationary pressures. The steel industry initiated a number of scrap surcharges and base-price increases during the year due to the increased cost of scrap steel. Labor costs are influenced mainly by production and shipment levels. Energy costs are associated with the Registrant’s utilization of both electricity and natural gas as its power sources, with electric arc furnaces using electricity and with reheat furnaces using natural gas. The arc furnaces are used in the actual melting of scrap steel (to produce billets), while the reheat furnaces are used to reheat the billets which are then rolled into a finished product. The availability of this power supply and the peak demands by the Registrant determine energy pricing.

~~RESULTS~~Interest OFincome ~~OPERATIONS~~decreased during both periods as a result of both reduced interest rates and the level of investments.

~~Sales~~Antitrust ~~for~~Litigation ~~the~~Settlement nine months increased by 52.2%, mainly, as a result of improvements in selling prices and/or product mix for merchant bar products of 45.6%, specialty steel sections by an average of 17.9%, fabricated products of 20.8% and billets of 42.3%. Sales for the three months, the highest of any quarter in the Registrant’s

Other income in the 2004 first quarter includes $3,061,820 received as a result of partial settlements received in conjunction with a class action suit for antitrust litigation against the Company’s graphite electrode suppliers.

Discontinued Operations

The January 27, 2005 sale and liquidation of RESCO Steel Products Corporation, a wholly-owned rebar subsidiary, resulted in the discontinued operations for the comparable periods. The six month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 reflect a loss, before tax benefit, from discontinued operations of $327,578 and $197,896, respectively. The three month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 reflect a loss from discontinued operations of $0 and $26,283, respectively. The 2005 six month period also includes a loss of $790,685, representing the loss on the disposition of the subsidiary.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was relatively constant for both periods compared.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Working capital as of April 30, 2005 was $141,076,501, an increase of $25,575,747 from October 31, 2004, as working capital provided from operations exceeded capital expenditures, dividends and changes to long-term debt. At April 30, 2005, the current ratio was 3.3 to 1 and the quick ratio was 1.3 to 1.

Net cash used in operations was ($1,785,763) for the six month period ended April 30, 2005 as compared to ($226,462) for the six month period ended April 30, 2004. Net cash flows related to operating assets and liabilities decreased $11,728,214, which was primarily attributable to decreases in accounts payables, profit sharing contributions, and income taxes more than offsetting decreases in accounts receivable and inventories. Net earnings improved $9,012,323. Earnings for the six month period ended April 30, 2004 included a $3,061,820 payment received from graphite electrode plaintiffs in conjunction with a class action suit for antitrust violations. No amounts were received in 2005 related to this matter. The Company incurred a loss of $790,685 on the sale of a subsidiary, reflected in the 2005 year.

~~history,~~Net ~~increased~~cash provided by ~~57.3%,~~(used primarily, due to higher selling prices for billets and for bar, specialty and fabricated products of 56.3%, 55.2%, 31.3% and 29.9%, respectively. Both periods experienced increased tons shipped for merchant bar, specialty sections and fabricated products, each contributing to the sales improvements for the respective periods, while a drop in) ~~billet~~investing ~~shipments~~activities ~~negatively impacted the periods’ sales. The improvement in merchant bar product selling prices during both periods compared~~ was ~~due~~$973,434 mainly, to a 68.9% nine month and a 59.2% three month spike in scrap steel, our main raw material, which prompted several industry-wide price increases. Business conditions continued to improve within the steel industry which created higher demand for ~~bar products, bolstering order rates and backlogs, and resulting in increased merchant bar shipments of 21.0% and 13.7% during~~ the ~~nine~~six months and quarter, respectively. Improved product mix and favorable competitive conditions, within several market segments, brought higher average selling prices for specialty steel sections during both periods compared. Better economic conditions, within certain niche markets, created improved demand, sending shipment levels higher for specialty steel products by 27.7% for the nine month period ~~and~~ended ~~11.9%~~April ~~during~~30, ~~the~~2005 ~~three months. Fabricated product selling prices increased~~as ~~for both periods~~ compared, ~~influenced mainly by higher raw material costs. Fabricated product shipment levels improved 15.0% during the nine months compared and 17.0% for the third quarter, primarily due~~ to ~~better average delivery times during the current year~~($1, ~~together with increasing activity and an easing of competitive conditions within the nonresidential construction segment. Billet selling prices increased for both the quarter and nine months~~035,922) ~~as sharp rises in scrap prices triggered changes in billet prices. Strong demand~~ for ~~finished steel in~~ the ~~2004~~six ~~third~~month ~~quarter~~period ~~and~~ended ~~nine~~April ~~months required a higher utilization of billets internally~~30, ~~helped by the June restart of a second furnace and caster at the Roanoke facility~~2004. ~~This additional~~Expenditures ~~internal consumption resulted in a 29.1% decrease in billet shipments~~ for ~~the three months and a 26.7% decrease for the nine month period. Cost of sales increased by 36.1% during both the nine months and quarter~~property, ~~mainly,~~plant ~~as a result of the increased tons shipped of bar, specialty~~ and ~~fabricated~~equipment ~~products,~~amounted ~~together~~to ~~with higher costs of energy and scrap steel, in spite of reduced billet shipments. Repairs and maintenance of~~ $183,~~637~~357,~~099~~007 and $61,~~885~~710,~~432~~831 for the ~~2004~~six ~~nine~~ month ~~and three month~~ periods, ~~respectively,~~ended ~~increased~~April ~~from $15~~30,~~264,899~~ ~~and~~2005 ~~$6,595,902 for the 2003 nine month~~ and ~~three month periods~~2004, respectively~~, due to required equipment repair needs per period~~. ~~The~~For Registrant has no significant deferred maintenance and believes its facilities are operating within reasonable productive capacities. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased from 6.2% to 16.1% and from 7.6% to 20.0% for the ~~nine~~six month ~~and three month periods, respectively. The increased margins~~ ~~for both~~ periods ~~compared~~ended ~~resulted,~~April ~~primarily~~30, ~~from~~2005 ~~the higher selling prices for all products classes, coupled with the effects of increased raw steel~~ and ~~bar production levels on fixed costs~~2004, ~~and~~net ~~improved~~cash ~~average~~provided ~~margins~~by ~~for~~(used ~~fabricated products and specialty steel sections, which more than offset higher scrap and energy costs. Administrative expenses increased~~ in) ~~both~~investing ~~periods~~activities ~~compared,~~included ~~mainly,~~net asproceeds ~~a result~~ of ~~increased executive and other management compensation of~~ $24,~~474~~206,~~759~~829 and ~~$1,552,511,~~ ~~and higher expenses for insurance of~~ $1645,~~115~~549,~~866~~ ~~and $369,075, professional fees of $1,583,282 and $457,620 (most in relation to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and bad debt reserves of $773,238 and $247,494 for the nine months and three months,~~ respectively~~. Administrative expenses~~, ~~as a percentage of sales, dropped~~ from ~~7.4% to 6.8% for~~ the ~~nine~~sale ~~month period and from 6.6% to 6.3% for the three month period, as a result~~ of the improvements in sales. Interest expense decreased in both periods compared due to reduced average borrowings and lower average interest rates, which more than offset lower interest income. Profit sharing expense is based on earnings before income taxes in accordance with provisions of the Registrant’s various retirement plans. During both current periods, two plans accrued benefits as a ~~result~~subsidiary ~~of earnings, while a third plan provided no benefits due to losses. Other operating expenses were reduced by $3,061,820~~ and ~~$520,960,~~other ~~respectively~~investments, in the 2004 and 2003 first quarters, and reflected in each nine month period, as a result of partial settlements received in conjunction with a class action suit for antitrust violations against the Registrant’s graphite electrode suppliersrespectively. The effective income tax rate was relatively constant for both periods compared. The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle was a 2003 first quarter charge of $228,410, resulting from the adoption on November 1, 2002 of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”—see Note 9.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $1,588,264 for the six month period ended April 30, 2005 as compared to ($1,339,850) for the six month period ended April 30, 2004. Cash dividends of $2,452,079 were paid in 2005 as compared to $1,641,422 paid in 2004, as the Company increased its dividend rate. For the six month periods ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, net cash used in financing activities included payments of long-term debt of $22,708,868 and $22,687, respectively, with borrowings of $29,000,000 providing cash in 2005. Most of the 2005 debt activity related to the Company’s revolving credit facility. With this new credit facility, the loans are secured by a pledge of the outstanding stock in each of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries and by a lien on the tangible and intangible property of the Company and each of its subsidiaries. The Company may prepay the loans at any time at its option, and is required to make mandatory prepayments based on certain circumstances. The loans are subject to various representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants, including the obligation to maintain a leverage ratio of less than or equal to 3:1, to maintain fixed charge coverage ratio greater than or equal to 1.10:1, and to limit capital expenditures on a consolidated basis to no more than $75,000,000 over the term of the credit facility. The revolving loan requires quarterly payments of interest until the fifth anniversary date of the credit facility at which time the outstanding principle balance must be paid in full.

The Company’s ability to meet its debt service obligations and reduce its total debt will depend upon its future performance, which in turn, will depend upon general economic, financial and business conditions, along with competition, legislation and regulations that are largely beyond its control. The Company believes that cash flow from operations (improving with better market conditions and corporate earnings), together with availability on the new revolving credit facility, should provide the liquidity and capital resources necessary to remain competitive, fund operations, and meet required debt retirement for at least the next twelve months.

The Company was in compliance with the covenants of its loan agreement as of April 30, 2005.

At April 30, 2005, there were commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $4,106,011. These commitments, together with current debt maturities, will affect future working capital and liquidity, and will be financed from available cash reserves, internally generated funds and the revolving credit facility.

During the period, the ratio of debt to equity dropped to 0.9 to 1, while the percentage of long-term debt to total capitalization rose to 27.7%, as long-term debt and capital lease obligation increased to $65,222,308. Stockholders’ equity increased to $170,514,591, mainly as a result of net earnings of $15,768,055 exceeding dividends of $2,452,079.

Management is of the opinion that adoption of the Clean Air Act Amendments or any other environmental concerns will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s operations, capital resources or liquidity. Applicable additional future capital expenditures are presently estimated to be less than $10,000,000 and will be completed and funded, as the Company’s financial resources permit.

~~FINANCIAL~~The ~~CONDITION~~following table sets forth the Company’s contractual obligations, ~~LIQUIDITY~~excluding ~~AND~~interest ~~CAPITAL~~charges, ~~RESOURCES~~at April 30, 2005, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods:

Working capital as of July 31, 2004 was $93,402,272, an increase of $8,120,383 from October 31, 2003, as working capital provided from operations exceeded capital expenditures, dividends and changes to long-term debt. The current ratio of 2.3 to 1 and the quick ratio of 1.0 to 1 both indicate ample liquidity and a healthy financial condition.


	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 -3 years		3 -5 years		More than 5 years
Long-Term Debt	$	71,043,144	$	6,000,000	$	12,000,000	$	53,043,144		—
Capital Lease Obligations		199,276		20,112		43,496		48,252	$	87,416
Operating Leases		6,847,405		1,724,618		3,048,369		2,074,418		—
Purchase Obligations		4,106,011		4,106,011		—		—		—
Other Long-Term Liabilities		4,165,550		411,000		779,000		791,000		2,184,550

Total	$	86,361,386	$	12,261,741	$	15,870,865	$	55,956,814	$	2,271,966

Net cash provided by (used in) operations was ($122,208) for the nine month period ended July 31, 2004 as compared to $12,879,148 for the nine month period ended July 31, 2003. Net cash used related to operating assets and liabilities increased $29,935,008 (2004 - ($24,725,799); 2003 - $5,209,209), which was primarily attributable to the 52.2% growth in the Registrant’s sales. Earnings (loss) from operations improved $18,078,965 (2004 - $14,513,277; 2003 - ($3,925,688)). Earnings for the nine month period ended July 31, 2004 included a $3,061,820 payment received from graphite electrode plaintiffs in conjunction with a class action suit for antitrust violations. Amounts received related to this matter were $520,960 in the nine month period ended July 31, 2003.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $1,311,820 for the nine month period ended July 31, 2004 as compared to $7,918,955 for the nine month period ended July 31, 2003. Expenditures for property, plant and equipment amounted to $2,675,051 and $1,874,315 for the nine month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the nine month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, net cash provided by investing activities included net proceeds of $3,686,141 and $10,525,106, respectively, from the sale of investments. A portion of the 2003 proceeds were primarily used to fund a $15,000,000 loan prepayment pursuant to an amendment to the Registrant’s term loan in January 2003. The amendment also revised certain financial covenants to be less restrictive and lowered total funded debt to $67,503,983, as of July 31, 2004.

Net cash used in financing activities was ($6,084,179) for the nine month period ended July 31, 2004 as compared to ($21,438,570) for the nine month period ended July 31, 2003. Cash dividends of $2,739,103 were paid in 2004 as compared to $1,640,922 paid in 2003, as the Registrant increased its dividend rate. For the nine month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, net cash used in financing activities included payments of long-term debt of $3,788,295 and $18,781,746, respectively, of which the 2003 amount included the $15,000,000 prepayment referred to above. As to debt maturities, refer to contractual obligations below.

The Registrant’s ability to meet its debt service obligations and reduce its total debt will depend upon its future performance, which in turn, will depend upon general economic, financial and business conditions, along with competition, legislation and regulations that are largely beyond its control. The Registrant believes that cash flow from operations, together with other available sources of funds including cash, will be adequate for at least the next twelve months for making required payments of principal and interest on its indebtedness and for funding anticipated capital expenditures and working capital requirements.

The Registrant was in compliance with its loan agreement, as amended, as of July 31, 2004.

At July 31, 2004, there were commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of approximately $1,060,000. In addition, during the 2002 second quarter, the Registrant unwound the balance of its interest rate swap and was obligated to pay, over the remaining term of the debt, a termination fee of $3,000,179, of which there was a remaining balance to be paid of $845,580 at July 31, 2004. These commitments, together with current debt maturities, will affect future earnings, working capital and liquidity, and will be financed from internally generated funds and existing cash reserves.

The termination of the interest rate swap, that was accounted for as a hedge, effectively converted $75,000,000 of fixed-rate debt into variable-rate borrowings, placing the Registrant at risk for future increases in market interest rates. However, the conversion to currently lower variable rates has resulted in interest savings of $4,557,257 to date.

During the period, the ratio of debt to equity rose to 1.2 to 1, while the percentage of long-term debt to total capitalization declined to 27.5%, due to current changes of $11,264,603 reducing long-term debt and capital lease obligation to $52,694,345. Stockholders’ equity increased to $138,675,265 as net earnings of $14,513,277 and the recognition of unrealized net gains on current and past hedging relationships of $380,607 exceeded dividends of $2,739,103.

The following table sets forth the Registrant’s contractual obligations, excluding interest charges, at July 31, 2004, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods:

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		More than 5 years
Long-Term Debt	$	67,503,983	$	15,003,983	$	52,500,000		—		—
Capital Lease Obligations		213,690		19,345		41,835	$	46,410	$	106,100
Operating Leases		3,097,224		1,170,861		1,253,377		672,986		—
Purchase Obligations		1,060,000		1,060,000		—		—		—
Other Long-Term Liabilities		4,567,808		948,664		546,916		300,000		2,772,228
Total	$	76,442,705	$	18,202,853	$	54,342,128	$	1,019,396	$	2,878,328

OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

The ~~Registrant~~Company has no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on the ~~Registrant~~Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The ~~Registrant~~Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with ~~accounting~~U. ~~principles~~S. generally accepted inaccounting ~~the United States of America~~principles. Estimates and assumptions are made, during the preparation of these financial statements, that affect the amounts reported. Periodically, the ~~Registrant~~Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to contracts, warranties (if any), taxes, insurance and environment. Under different assumptions and conditions, actual costs may vary from these estimates.

The ~~Registrant~~Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.: Allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained to provide for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of these customers became worse, resulting in their inability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The Registrant periodically reviews for impairment of its long-lived assets, and whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable, records an impairment charge if necessary. Compliance issues, associated with environmental laws and regulations established by federal, state and local authorities, could subject the Registrant to various related costs. The Registrant makes provision for these costs, but if the environmental laws and regulations or the varying underlying assumptions change, adjustments to the reserves may be necessary. Provision is also made for estimated costs associated with coverages for workers’ compensation insurance and self-insured health plans. These estimates and related reserves could require revision if circumstances and conditions warrant.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained to provide for estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Company’s customers to make required payments. Such allowances are estimated based on historical loss experience (relative to aging of accounts receivable) and current market economic conditions affecting our customers (i.e., bankruptcy filing). If the amount of allowances exceeds our estimates, or if the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Impairments of Long-Lived Assets - In accordance SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Impairment losses are recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated during the life of those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount.

Self-Retained Insurance Risks - The Company has self-retained insurance risks associated with coverage for workers’ compensation and insurance plans. Accrued liabilities have been recorded based on estimates of the ultimate costs to settle incurred and incurred but not reported claims. The Company’s estimates are based on judgments and actuarial assumptions regarding the frequency and severity of claims, historical claims loss data, economic conditions and claim management and settlement practices. If actual claims loss experience exceed our estimates, additional accruals may be required.

Contingencies - Compliance with environmental laws and regulations established by federal, state and local authorities may subject the Company to additional costs. The Company believes it is in compliance with such laws and regulations based on currently available facts and present laws and regulations.

Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.” When adopted, FSP No. 106-2 will supersede FSP No. 106-1, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” which was issued in January 2004 and permitted a sponsor of a postretirement health care plan that provides a prescription drug benefit to make a one-time election to defer accounting for the effects of the Act until more authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy was issued, which the Company elected. FSP No. 106-2 requires the Company to assess the impact of the federal subsidy on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. The Company adopted FSP No. 106-2, and based on its evaluating the effects of this Position, has determined there to be no material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) and requires these costs be treated as current period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 151 on its financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. SFAS No. 153 replaces the exception from fair value measurement included in APB Opinion No. 29 for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets with a general exception from fair value measurement for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. This statement will be applied prospectively and is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe adoption of this statement will have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In March 2005, FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an Interpretation of SFAS No. 143”, was issued. This interpretation clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation”, as used in SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. This Interpretation is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Retrospective application for interim financial information is permitted but is not required. The Company does not believe adoption of this Interpretation will have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

On November 1, 2004, the Company early adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123 R”). SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and purchases under employee stock purchase plans, to be recognized as an operating expense in the income statement. The cost of such share-based payments is to be recognized over the requisite service period based on fair values measured on the grant date of the award. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method. Under this method, SFAS No. 123R applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after October 31, 2004. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of October 31, 2004 is recognized as the requisite service is rendered. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R had no effect on the Company’s financial statements for the first quarter of 2005 since the requisite service had been rendered for all awards outstanding as of October 31, 2004. During the 2005 second quarter, the Company began to recognize compensation cost, reflected in the 2005 statements of earnings, related to its stock plans in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.

~~PART~~ Item I3. -Quantitative ~~ITEM~~and 3Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company had no outstanding derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments at April 30, 2005, although the Company does engage in transactions involving derivative ~~QUANTITATIVE~~instruments ~~AND~~from ~~QUALITATIVE~~time ~~DISCLOSURES~~to time as appropriate. During the quarter ended April 30, 2005, the short-term derivative commodity instruments that the Company had in place to minimize the Company’s exposure to natural gas purchases used in the manufacturing process at the Huntington, West Virginia facility expired. A further discussion of the Company’s use of derivative instruments is described in Note 7 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this filing.

~~ABOUT~~ Item ~~MARKET~~4. ~~RISK~~Controls and Procedures

As of July 31, 2004, the Registrant had no material outstanding derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments, or derivative commodity instruments. As described in Note 7 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q, the Registrant does engage in transactions involving derivative instruments from time to time when appropriate and, as of July 31, 2004, did have in place one new and several pre-existing short-term derivative commodity instruments to minimize the Registrant’s exposure to certain natural gas purchases used in the manufacturing process at the West Virginia facilities. As of July 31, 2004, the Registrant’s financial instruments were not exposed to significant market risk due to foreign currency exchange risk, commodity price risk, equity price risk, or interest rate risk. However, interest rates and various commodity prices could pose future risks in certain market conditions. As to interest rate risk, the Registrant performed a materiality assessment as of July 31, 2004, and assumed a 10% adverse change in interest rates applied to its floating rate debt. The analysis indicated that such a change would not have a material effect on the Registrant’s consolidated results of operations or on the fair value of its risk-sensitive financial instruments. As to commodity price risk, a hypothetical 10% change in the market price of natural gas would not have a materially adverse effect on the Registrant’s consolidated results of operations or on the fair value of its natural gas derivative contracts at July 31, 2004.

PART I - ITEM 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

~~Management,~~An ~~including~~evaluation was performed under the ~~Registrant~~supervision and with the participation of the Company’s ~~Principal~~management, including its Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and ~~Principal~~Chief Financial Officer, ~~have~~or ~~evaluated~~CFO, of the effectiveness of the ~~Registrant~~Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, (as such term is defined inunder ~~Rules~~Rule 13a-15(e) ~~and~~promulgated ~~15d-15~~under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (ethe “Exchange Act”)), as of ~~July~~April 3130, ~~2004~~ 2005. Based on ~~this~~that evaluation, the ~~Registrant~~Company’s ~~Principal~~management, including ~~Executive~~the ~~Officer~~CEO and ~~Principal~~CFO, ~~Financial Officer have~~ concluded that the ~~Registrant~~Company’s disclosure controls and procedures ~~were~~are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management and is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported as specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.

~~During~~There ~~the~~were ~~2004~~no ~~first~~changes ~~quarter, Deloitte & Touche informed the Registrant that they had identified a reportable condition~~ in the ~~design of the Registrant~~Company’s internal ~~controls.~~control ~~The~~over ~~condition,~~financial ~~which~~reporting ~~was~~identified ~~not~~in aconnection ~~material~~with ~~weakness,~~the ~~related~~evaluation ~~to a lack~~ of ~~segregation of duties between certain transaction recording~~such ~~functions~~controls ~~and~~that ~~related~~occurred asset accountability functions. Since being informed of this condition, the Registrant has taken various steps, including designing and instituting additional procedures, hiring additional staff, and separating and reorganizing functional responsibilities. Most of these changes were implemented during the ~~Registrant~~Company’s ~~second~~most ~~quarter~~recent ~~ended~~fiscal ~~April 30, 2004, with the remainder of changes completed during the third~~ quarter ~~ending July 31, 2004, and the Registrant believes~~ that ~~these~~has ~~changes~~materially will correct the condition noted by Deloitte & Touche. The Registrant regularly monitors and evaluates the design and effectiveness of its internal controls to improve its controls and procedures over time and to correct any matters that the Registrant discoversaffected, or that ~~are~~is ~~brought~~reasonably likely to ~~the~~materially ~~Registrant’s~~affect ~~attention. Other than noted herein, there were no significant changes in~~ the ~~Registrant~~Company’s internal ~~controls~~control over financial reporting ~~(as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(e)) that occurred during the third quarter which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, such controls~~.

2019

PART II ~~- OTHER INFORMATION~~

~~ITEM~~OTHER 1.INFORMATION ~~LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.~~

~~The Registrant is a participant with other steel producers in class action litigation against manufacturers of graphite electrodes, which are used in the~~ ~~melting~~Item ~~phase of steel production~~6. ~~The~~Exhibits ~~suit~~and ~~alleges~~Reports ~~that~~on ~~the~~Form ~~defendant~~8-K manufacturers violated the antitrust laws by fixing prices during the period July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1998. The Registrant is not one of the lead plaintiffs or otherwise a representative of the class in this litigation. As a member of the class, the Registrant receives only that information forwarded to it by the class representatives or counsel.

Certain of the defendants have entered into court approved settlements, resulting in partial distributions received by the Registrant during the period 1999 through July 31, 2004 of $7,312,908. The Registrant recognized the revenue upon realization.

The litigation remains unsettled and class counsel holds an unspecified amount of undistributed settlement funds. The Registrant expects to receive additional distributions, but does not anticipate the amounts to be material and does not know the precise timing of such future distributions. Because the Registrant does not expect any future amounts to be material, it does not believe that disclosure of the “gain contingency” is warranted. As under its existing policy, the Registrant will recognize the revenue upon realization. If the Registrant determines that future distributions might be material, it will disclose the “gain contingency” while exercising the caution provided in paragraph 17 of SFAS 5.

The Registrant is not involved in any legal proceedings or environmental matters outside the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, amounts accrued for potential awards or assessments in connection with these matters at this time are adequate, and the outcome of such environmental and legal concerns currently pending will not have a material effect on the Registrant’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Registrant reassesses these matters as new facts and cases are brought to management’s attention.

To the best of the Registrant’s information and belief no new legal proceedings were instituted against the Registrant or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries during the period covered by this report and there was no material development in or termination of the legal proceedings reported earlier by the Registrant on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 and Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended January 31, 2004 and April 30, 2004, as previously filed with the Commission.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

a. Exhibits.

The exhibits, listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index, following the signature page are filed as part of, and incorporated by reference into, this report.

b. Reports on Form 8-K.

Form 8-K dated ~~June~~January 827, ~~2004~~2005 and filed ~~June~~February 92, ~~2004~~2005, furnishing under ~~Item~~Items 122.05, a8.01 ~~news~~and ~~release~~9.01 ~~announcing~~an ~~financial~~announcement ~~condition~~of ~~and~~the ~~results~~January of27, ~~operations~~2005 ~~for~~sale of substantially all of the ~~quarter~~assets ~~ended~~of ~~April~~a 30wholly-owned subsidiary, ~~2004~~the associated exit or disposal costs and the related asset purchase and sale agreement.

21Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005 and filed February 3, 2005, furnishing under Items 1.01 and 9.01 the introduction and description of an entry into a material definitive agreement, providing for a new corporate stock incentive plan, an annual management incentive plan, and also amending and restating the directors’ retirement plan.

~~Table~~Form 8-K dated and filed February 18, 2005, furnishing under Items 1.01, 1.02 and 9.01 the introduction and description of ~~Contents~~an entry into a material definitive agreement, providing for executive employment continuity agreements with the six executive officers of the Company, which supercede and replace prior agreements.

Form 8-K dated March 7, 2005 and filed ~~June~~March 288, 2004, furnishing under ~~Item~~Items 72.02 and 9.01 a news release announcing ~~the~~financial ~~election~~results ~~of T.~~for ~~Joe~~the ~~Crawford~~quarter asended ~~President~~January ~~and~~31, ~~Chief Operating Officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation~~2005.

~~Form~~Items ~~8-K dated and filed July 26~~1, ~~2004~~2, ~~furnishing under Item 7 a news release announcing the election of William M. Watson~~3, ~~Jr.~~4 ~~as General Counsel~~ and ~~Secretary~~ of5 ~~Roanoke~~are ~~Electric~~omitted ~~Steel~~because ~~Corporation.~~the Ininformation arequired ~~separate~~by ~~action,~~these T.items ~~Joe~~is ~~Crawford~~not ~~was elected to the Registrant’s Board of Directors~~applicable.

Items 2, 3, 4 and 5 are omitted because the information required by these items is not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION
Date: June 8, 2005	ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION
		Registrant
	By:	/s/ Donald G. Smith
Date August 24, 2004		/s/ Donald G. Smith
		Donald G. Smith, Chairman, Treasurer and
		Donald G. Smith, Chairman, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
	By:	/s/ Mark G. Meikle
		Mark G. Meikle, Vice President – Finance and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

~~Date~~20 ~~August 24, 2004 /s/ Mark G. Meikle Mark G. Meikle, Vice President-Finance, Assistant Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principle Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)~~

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	~~Exhibit (~~Description)	~~Page~~
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002 (file number 0-2389))
3.2	Bylaws, as amended, of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation (~~FILED~~incorporated ~~HEREWITH~~by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))	~~26 - 49~~
4.1	Form of certificate representing common stock of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement No. 333-25299, on Form S-8, filed with the Commission on April 16, 1997)
4.2	Credit Agreement dated asOctober of4, ~~December~~2004 15among Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation, ~~1998~~the lender parties thereto, and Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the ~~Quarterly~~Annual Report on Form 10-QK for the ~~quarter~~fiscal year ended ~~January~~October 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))
4.3	Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of February, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))
10.1	Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation Employees’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1998 (file number 0-2389))
4.4	Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of September, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))
10.2	Amendment No. 4 to the Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation Employees’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 (file number 0-2389))
4.5	Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of April 23, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))
10.3	Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
4.6	Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 31, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))
10.4	Form of Performance Grant Agreement for one, two, and three-year performance grants under the Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and dated January 28, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
4.7	Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2004 (file number 0-2389))
10.5	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for outside directors under the Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan dated January 28, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
15	Letter re Unaudited Interim Financial Information (FILED HEREWITH)	50
10.6	Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 (file number 0-2389))
31.1	Certification of the principal executive officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)	51
10.7	Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation Amended and Restated Directors’ Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
31.2	Certification of the principal financial officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)	52
10.8	Form of Executive Officer Incentive Arrangement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1999 (file number 0-2389))
10.9	Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 3, 2005 (file number 0-2389))

32.1	Certification of the principal executive officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)	53
10.10	Executive Employment Continuity Agreement dated February 18, 2005 with Donald G. Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
32.2	Certification of the principal financial officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)	54
10.11	Executive Employment Continuity Agreement dated February 18, 2005 with T. Joe Crawford (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
10.12	Executive Employment Continuity Agreement dated February 18, 2005 with Timothy R. Duke (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
10.13	Executive Employment Continuity Agreement dated February 18, 2005 with Donald R. Higgins (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
10.14	Executive Employment Continuity Agreement dated February 18, 2005 with Mark G. Meikle (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
10.15	Executive Employment Continuity Agreement dated February 18, 2005 with William M. Watson, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005 (file number 0-2389))
10.16	Collective Bargaining Agreement dated June 10, 2002 by and between SWVA, Inc. and the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2002 (file number 0-2389))
31.1	Certification of the principal executive officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)
31.2	Certification of the principal financial officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)
32.1	Certification of the principal executive officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)
32.2	Certification of the principal financial officer of Roanoke Electric Steel Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (FILED HEREWITH)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · ROANOKE ELECTRIC STEEL CORP