~~Table~~UNITED ofSTATES ~~Contents~~

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2006

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 333-88157

CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		75-2825338
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)

3101 Towercreek Parkway, Suite 300

Atlanta, Georgia 30339

(Address of principal executive offices)

Telephone number: (678) 742-4600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨

~~Yes x No ¨~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

~~Indicate~~Large ~~by check mark whether the registrant is a large~~ accelerated filer, an¨ ~~accelerated~~Accelerated filer, or¨ ~~a non~~Non-accelerated filer. ~~See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.~~ x

~~Large~~Indicate ~~accelerated~~by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the ~~filer ¨ Accelerated~~Exchange ~~filer~~Act). Yes ¨ ~~Non-accelerated filer~~ No x

~~Indicate~~As byof ~~check~~November 1, ~~mark~~2006, ~~whether~~there ~~the~~were ~~registrant~~1,000 ~~is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2~~ of the ~~Exchange~~registrant’s ~~Act)~~member units outstanding.

~~Yes ¨ No x~~ CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC

AsINDEX ~~of May 1, 2006, there were 1,000 of the registrant’s member units outstanding.~~


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		3

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005		3

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (RESTATED)		4

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (RESTATED)		5

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		6

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		23

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		30

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures		31

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings		33

ITEM 1A. RiskFactors		33

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		35

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		35

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		35

ITEM 5. Other Information		36

ITEM 6. Exhibits		36

Signature		37

~~CONSOLIDATED~~2 ~~CONTAINER COMPANY LLC~~

~~INDEX~~PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		Page
	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSAt March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005		3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005		4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFor the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005		5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		6
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	23
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	23
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	24
Signature		25

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2 CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Table~~CONDENSED ofCONSOLIDATED ~~Contents~~BALANCE SHEETS

~~PART~~(Unaudited) ~~I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~

~~ITEM~~(Amounts 1.in ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~thousands)

CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,200		$	1,098
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,662 in 2006 and $1,440 in 2005)		86,460			80,128
Related party receivable (Note 12)		26,558			35,560
Inventories (Note 6)		52,038			55,018
Other current assets (Note 7)		22,358			29,393

Total current assets		188,614			201,197
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, Net (Note 8)		254,149			259,334
GOODWILL (Note 4)		221,483			219,427
INTANGIBLES AND OTHER ASSETS (Note 5)		22,705			21,228

	$	686,951		$	701,186

LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	64,686		$	103,714
Related party payable (Note 12)		2,781			31,416
Accrued liabilities (Note 9)		45,721			47,517
Revolving credit facility (Note 10)		21,000			2,900
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 10)		10,048			218,568

Total current liabilities		144,236			404,115
LONG-TERM DEBT (Note 10)		594,340			365,654
OTHER LIABILITIES		39,201			41,401
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)

MEMBER’S DEFICIT:
Member’s deficit		(60,093	)		(79,118	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation		154			21
Minimum pension liability		(30,887	)		(30,887	)

Total member’s deficit		(90,826	)		(109,984	)

	$	686,951		$	701,186

~~CONDENSED~~See ~~CONSOLIDATED~~notes ~~BALANCE~~to ~~SHEETS~~condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~(Unaudited)~~3

~~(Amounts~~ CONSOLIDATED inCONTAINER ~~thousands)~~ COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

	March 31,2006			December 31,2005
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	525		$	1,098
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,617 in 2006 and $1,440 in 2005)		119,390			115,688
Inventories		49,458			54,939
Other current assets		18,600			29,393
Total current assets		187,973			201,118
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, Net		258,287			259,334
GOODWILL		219,075			219,427
INTANGIBLES AND OTHER ASSETS		20,102			21,228
	$	685,437		$	701,107
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	87,602		$	103,714
Accrued liabilities		46,487			55,650
Revolving credit facility		8,100			2,900
Current portion of long-term debt		3,401			4,068
Total current liabilities		145,590			166,332
LONG-TERM DEBT		584,185			580,154
OTHER LIABILITIES		40,217			41,401
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)		—			—
MEMBER’S DEFICIT:
Member’s deficit		(53,680	)		(55,914	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation		12			21
Minimum pension liability		(30,887	)		(30,887	)
Total member’s deficit		(84,555	)		(86,780	)
	$	685,437		$	701,107

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE

~~See~~INCOME ~~notes~~(LOSS) ~~to condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

3(Unaudited)

~~Table~~(Amounts ofin ~~Contents~~thousands)

CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2006			September 30, 2005 (Restated)			September 30, 2006		September 30, 2005 (Restated)
Net trade sales	$	179,018		$	176,305		$	553,781	$	534,648
Related party sales (Note 12)		36,476			30,835			103,029		90,882

Net sales		215,494			207,140			656,810		625,530
Cost of sales		186,835			185,682			569,613		565,896
Settlement gain (Note 12)		16,144			—			16,144		—

Gross profit		44,803			21,458			103,341		59,634
Selling, general and administrative expense		11,824			9,567			35,277		32,222
Amortization expense		535			376			1,142		615
Loss on disposal of assets and impairments		937			195			2,475		3,144

Operating income		31,507			11,320			64,447		23,653
Interest expense		15,685			14,049			45,723		40,945

Income (loss) before taxes		15,822			(2,729	)		18,724		(17,292	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		(21	)		25			94		(64	)

Net income (loss)		15,843			(2,754	)		18,630		(17,228	)
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		12			212			133		76

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	15,855		$	(2,542	)	$	18,763	$	(17,152	)

~~CONDENSED~~See ~~CONSOLIDATED~~notes ~~STATEMENTS~~to OFcondensed ~~OPERATIONS~~consolidated ~~AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME~~financial ~~(LOSS)~~statements.

~~(Unaudited)~~4

~~(Amounts~~ CONSOLIDATED inCONTAINER ~~thousands)~~COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,2006			March 31,2005
Net sales	$	223,523		$	205,020
Cost of sales		194,017			188,730
Gross profit		29,506			16,290
Selling, general and administrative expense		11,871			11,134
Amortization expense		307			83
Loss on disposal of assets		235			3,424
Operating income		17,093			1,649
Interest expense		14,859			12,998
Income (loss) before taxes		2,234			(11,349	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		54			(223	)
Net income (loss)		2,180			(11,126	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(9	)		(12	)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	2,171		$	(11,138	)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~See~~(Unaudited) ~~notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

4(Amounts in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2006			September 30, 2005 (Restated)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	18,630		$	(17,228	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Settlement gain (Note 12)		(16,144	)		—
Depreciation and amortization		32,938			32,885
Amortization of debt issuance costs		2,247			2,187
Stock based compensation		289			86
Loss on disposal of assets and impairments		2,475			3,144
Accretion of discounted notes		14,694			13,073
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effect of the acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(5,570	)		(17,510	)
Related party receivable (Note 12)		9,002			(1,769	)
Inventories		3,395			18,178
Other current assets		7,055			1,491
Other assets		(2,581	)		(2,136	)
Accounts payable		(38,577	)		(425	)
Related party payable (Note 12)		(3,398	)		6,222
Accrued liabilities		(2,375	)		(12,004	)
Other liabilities		(2,200	)		(2,995	)

Net cash flows from operating activities		19,880			23,199

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		(24,665	)		(31,885	)
Net change in investments		—			23
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		246			7,217
Cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired of $238 in 2006 and $583 in 2005)		(10,164	)		(10,823	)

Net cash flows from investing activities		(34,583	)		(35,468	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from revolving line of credit		18,100			7,100
Principal payments on notes payable to banks, capital leases and promissory notes		(3,471	)		(1,759	)
Proceeds from the exercise of options		184			—
Payment of debt issuance costs		(63	)		(7	)
Tax distribution to the benefit of the member		(78	)		(121	)

Net cash flows from financing activities		14,672			5,213

EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		133			76

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		102			(6,980	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		1,098			7,896

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	1,200		$	916

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	33,467		$	31,131

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable	$	1,096		$	—

Unpaid purchases of property and equipment included in accrued liabilities	$	822		$	—

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Conversion of accrued liability to a note payable related to Dean Foods Settlement Agreement	$	9,093		$	—

Assumption of promissory notes and capital leases in relation to acquisition of STC Plastics, Inc.	$	—		$	2,311

Issuance of stock options of Holdings related to acquisition of STC Plastics, Inc.	$	—		$	3,000

Assumption of promissory notes related to acquisition of One Hoss Shay Corp., dba Mayfair Plastics	$	—		$	2,684

~~CONSOLIDATED~~See ~~CONTAINER~~notes ~~COMPANY~~to ~~LLC~~condensed ~~AND~~consolidated ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~financial statements.

~~CONDENSED~~5 ~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~ CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~(Amounts~~NOTES inTO ~~thousands)~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,2006			March 31,2005
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	2,180		$	(11,126	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		11,214			11,676
Amortization of debt issuance costs		747			729
Stock based compensation		63			165
Loss on disposal of assets		235			3,424
Accretion of discounted notes		4,772			4,244
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effect of the acquisitions
Accounts receivable		(3,707	)		(17,262	)
Inventories		5,481			4,266
Other current assets		10,793			7,860
Other assets		(655	)		(916	)
Accounts payable		(16,112	)		9,082
Accrued liabilities		(8,873	)		(5,654	)
Other liabilities		(1,184	)		(1,723	)
Net cash flow from operating activities		4,954			4,765
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		(9,256	)		(6,579	)
Net change in investments		—			1
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		51			10
Cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired of $0 in 2006 and $350 in 2005)		(246	)		(5,343	)
Net cash flow from investing activities		(9,451	)		(11,911	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from revolving lines of credit		5,200			4,900
Payments on notes payable to banks, capital leases and promissory notes		(1,258	)		(573	)
Proceeds from the exercise of options		8			—
Payment of debt issuance costs		—			(3	)
Tax distribution to the benefit of the member		(17	)		(86	)
Net cash flow from financing activities		3,933			4,238
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash		(9	)		(12	)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(573	)		(2,920	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		1,098			7,896
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	525		$	4,976
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	13,983		$	13,210
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Assumption of promissory notes and capital leases in relation to acquisition of STC Plastics, Inc.	$	—		$	2,311
Issuance of stock options of Holdings related to acquisition of STC Plastics, Inc.	$	—		$	3,000

(Unaudited)

~~See~~1. ~~notes~~ORGANIZATION toAND BASIS ~~condensed~~OF ~~consolidated~~PRESENTATION ~~financial statements.~~

5The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Consolidated Container Company LLC (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments are reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 is derived from audited financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005. Results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and the corresponding balance sheet as of September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2006.

~~Table~~The Company is wholly owned by Consolidated Container Holdings LLC (“Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company. Holdings is a holding company with no assets, operations, or cash flow separate from its investment in the Company and its subsidiaries. The common units of ~~Contents~~Holdings are 24.5% owned by Reid Plastics Holdings Inc., 16.5% owned by Vestar Packaging LLC, 13.4% owned by Vestar CCH LLC, and 44.8% owned by Franklin Plastics, Inc., a subsidiary of Dean Foods Company (“Dean Foods”). Each of Reid Plastics Holdings Inc., Vestar CCH LLC, and Vestar Packaging LLC are controlled by Vestar Capital Partners, III L.P. and its affiliates. Additionally, in 2004, Holdings issued Series B Convertible Preferred Units, which are 73.4% owned by Vestar CCH Preferred LLC and 26.6% owned by Franklin Plastics Inc. Upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Units, the holders of such converted units would own in the aggregate in excess of approximately 95% (before management options) of the then outstanding units of Holdings.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~2. ~~CONTAINER~~RECENTLY ~~COMPANY~~ISSUED ~~LLC~~ACCOUNTING ~~AND~~PRONOUNCEMENTS ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES~~In TOSeptember ~~CONDENSED~~2006, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~the ~~FINANCIAL~~Financial ~~STATEMENTS~~Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires an employer that sponsors one or more single-employer defined benefit plans to (a) recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a benefit plan in its statement of financial position, (b) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”, or SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”, (c) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end, and (d) disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. SFAS 158 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, with early adoption encouraged. The Company is in the process of evaluating SFAS 158.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (~~Unaudited~~“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS 157 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating SFAS 157.

1.6 ~~ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION~~

~~The accompanying~~CONSOLIDATED ~~unaudited~~CONTAINER ~~condensed~~COMPANY ~~consolidated financial statements of Consolidated Container Company~~ LLC ~~(the~~AND ~~“Company”)~~SUBSIDIARIES have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments are reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 is derived from audited financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and the corresponding balance sheet as of March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2006.

~~The~~NOTES ~~Company~~TO isCONDENSED ~~wholly~~CONSOLIDATED ~~owned~~FINANCIAL bySTATEMENTS Consolidated Container Holdings LLC (“Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company. Holdings is a holding company with no assets, operations, or cash flow separate from its investment in the Company and its subsidiaries. The common units of Holdings are 24.5% owned by Reid Plastics Holdings Inc., 16.5% owned by Vestar Packaging LLC, 13.4% owned by Vestar CCH LLC, and 44.8% owned by Franklin Plastics, Inc., a subsidiary of Dean Foods Company. Each of Reid Plastics Holdings Inc., Vestar CCH LLC, and Vestar Packaging LLC are controlled by Vestar Capital Partners, III L.P. and its affiliates. Additionally, in 2004 Holdings issued Series B Convertible Preferred Units, which are 73.4% owned by Vestar CCH Preferred LLC and 26.6% owned by Franklin Plastics Inc. Upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Units, the holders of such converted units would own in the aggregate in excess of approximately 95% (before management options) of the then outstanding units of Holdings.

2.(Unaudited) ~~RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS~~

In September ~~2005~~2006, the ~~Emerging~~SEC ~~Issues~~issued ~~Task~~Staff ~~Force (“EITF”) of the Financial~~ Accounting ~~Standards~~Bulletin ~~Board~~No. 108, (“~~FASB”)~~Considering ~~issued~~the Effects ~~EITF~~of ~~Issue~~Prior ~~04-13,~~Year ~~“Accounting~~Misstatements ~~for~~when ~~Purchases~~Quantifying ~~and~~Misstatements ~~Sales~~in ofCurrent ~~Inventory~~Year ~~with~~Financial ~~the~~Statements” ~~Same~~(“SAB ~~Counterparty~~108”,). ~~which concluded~~SAB ~~that~~108 ~~entities~~provides ~~that~~interpretive ~~enter~~guidance ~~into~~on ~~inventory~~how ~~purchase~~the ~~and~~effects ~~sales~~of ~~transactions with~~ the ~~same~~carryover ~~counterparty,~~or inreversal ~~contemplation~~ of ~~one~~prior ~~another,~~year misstatements should ~~combine~~be ~~the~~considered ~~transactions~~in ~~and~~quantifying ~~treat~~a ~~them~~current asyear ~~nonmonetary exchanges involving inventory~~misstatement. ~~Nonmonetary exchanges~~The ofSEC ~~finished~~staff ~~goods~~believes ~~for~~that ~~raw~~registrants ~~material~~should ~~and~~quantify ~~finished~~errors ~~goods~~using ~~for~~both ~~work-in-process~~a inbalance ~~the~~sheet ~~same~~and ~~line~~an ofincome ~~business~~statement ~~should~~approach beand ~~recorded~~evaluate atwhether ~~fair~~either ~~value.~~approach ~~All~~results ~~other~~in ~~inventory-for-inventory~~quantifying ~~exchange~~a misstatement ~~transactions~~that, ~~within~~when ~~the~~all ~~same~~relevant ~~line~~quantitative ~~of business do not culminate the earnings process~~ and ~~therefore~~qualitative ~~should~~factors beare ~~recognized~~considered, atis ~~carrying value~~material. ~~The~~SAB ~~EITF~~108 iswill be effective for ~~new~~the ~~inventory~~Company’s ~~arrangements~~fiscal ~~entered~~year ~~into~~ending December 31, ~~or modifications or renewals of existing inventory arrangements occurring~~2006, inwith ~~interim~~early orapplication ~~annual reporting periods beginning after March 15, 2006~~encouraged. The Company ~~will~~is ~~adopt this EITF~~ in the ~~quarter~~process ~~ended~~of ~~June 30,~~evaluating ~~2006~~SAB ~~and it does not anticipate that the implementation will have a material impact on its financial statements~~108.

6On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and Related Implementation Issues” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a Company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 will be effective as of the beginning of fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of implementing this new standard.

~~Table~~3. ofBUSINESS ~~Contents~~ACQUISITIONS

~~CONSOLIDATED~~STC ~~CONTAINER~~Plastics, ~~COMPANY~~Inc. ~~LLC~~(“STC”) ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES~~On TOFebruary 15, ~~CONDENSED~~2005, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~the ~~FINANCIAL~~Company ~~STATEMENTS—~~acquired STC with the primary purpose of entering into additional polycarbonate (~~Continued~~“PC”) market segments. The results of operation have been consolidated with the Company’s operating results since the acquisition date. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company finalized the allocation of the total purchase price.

One Hoss Shay Corp., dba Mayfair Plastics (~~Unaudited~~“Mayfair”)

3On June 30, 2005, the Company acquired Mayfair by merging Mayfair into STC, with STC being the surviving company. ~~BUSINESS~~The ~~ACQUISITIONS~~primary purpose of this acquisition was to provide the Company with a west coast shuttle platform. The results of operations of Mayfair have been consolidated with the Company’s operating results since the acquisition date, June 30, 2005. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company finalized the allocation of the total purchase price.

~~STC~~Steel Valley Plastics, Inc. (“~~STC~~SVP”)

On ~~February~~December 1514, 2005, the Company acquired ~~STC~~substantially ~~with~~all of the ~~primary~~assets of SVP. The purpose of ~~entering~~this ~~into~~acquisition ~~additional~~was to expand the Company’s presence in the bulk PC water bottle market in the northeastern ~~polycarbonate~~and mid-western United States (“PCU.S.”) ~~market segments~~. The results of operations of ~~STC~~SVP have been consolidated with the Company’s operating results since the acquisition date, ~~February~~December 1514, 2005. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company finalized the allocation of the total purchase price.

~~The~~Quintex ~~following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at February 15~~Corporation, ~~2005.~~Salt ~~During~~Lake ~~2005~~City, ~~the Company~~UT ~~finalized~~(“Quintex ~~the valuation of certain intangible assets.~~ Utah”)

	(Amounts inthousands)
Current assets	$	4,009
Long-term assets		4,482
Goodwill		4,873
Total assets acquired		13,364
Current liabilities		1,297
Long-term liabilities		3,385
Total liabilities acquired		4,682
Net assets acquired	$	8,682

On July 5, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Quintex Utah. The purpose of this acquisition was to extend the Company’s manufacturing footprint into the Mountain states and expand the technology platforms that already enable the Company to service a wide range of customers and attractive

~~During~~7 the first quarter of 2006, the Company finalized the allocation of the total purchase price of $9.9 million, net of cash received of $0.4 million, over the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and other intangible assets without any material adjustment of the previously recorded purchase price allocation.

~~One~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Hoss~~CONTAINER ~~Shay~~COMPANY ~~Corp.,~~LLC ~~dba~~AND ~~Mayfair~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~Plastics (“Mayfair”)~~

OnNOTES ~~June 30,~~TO ~~2005,~~CONDENSED ~~the~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Company~~FINANCIAL ~~acquired~~STATEMENTS Mayfair by merging Mayfair into STC, with STC being the surviving company. The primary purpose of this acquisition was to provide the Company with a west coast shuttle platform. The results of operations of Mayfair have been consolidated with the Company’s operating results since the acquisition date, June 30, 2005.

~~The~~(Unaudited) Company allocated the total purchase price of $8.4 million, net of cash received of $0.2 million and including direct costs incurred for the acquisition that were paid during the third quarter of 2005 totaling $0.1 million, over the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and other intangible assets based on preliminary estimates. The Company expects to finalize the Mayfair purchase price allocation by June 30, 2006.

~~Steel~~ markets. ~~Valley~~At ~~Plastics~~the acquisition date, ~~Inc~~the Company paid cash of $9.8 ~~(“SVP”)~~million, net of cash received of $0.2 million. The results of operations of Quintex Utah have been consolidated with the Company’s operating results since the acquisition date, July 5, 2006.

OnThe ~~December 14,~~following ~~2005,~~table summarizes the ~~Company~~estimated ~~acquired~~fair ~~substantially~~values ~~all~~ of the assets ofacquired ~~SVP.~~and ~~The~~liabilities ~~purpose~~assumed ofat ~~this~~July 5, ~~acquisition~~2006. ~~was~~The ~~to expand the~~ Company~~’s presence~~ is in the ~~bulk~~process PCof ~~water~~finalizing ~~bottle market in~~ the ~~northeastern~~valuation ~~and~~of ~~midwestern~~certain ~~United~~intangible ~~States (“U~~assets.~~S.”).~~ ~~The~~Thus, ~~results~~the ofallocation ~~operations~~ of ~~SVP have been consolidated with~~ the ~~Company’s~~purchase ~~operating~~price ~~results~~is ~~since~~subject ~~the acquisition date,~~to ~~December 14, 2005~~refinement.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to intangible assets totaling $0.2 million based on preliminary estimates of SVP’s customer list and customer order backlog.


	(Amounts in thousands)
Cash	$	238
Accounts receivable		767
Inventories		415
Property and equipment		2,220
Other current assets		29
Goodwill and intangible assets		6,823

Total assets acquired		10,492
Accounts payable		291
Accrued liabilities		49

Total liabilities assumed		340

Net assets acquired	$	10,152

7In connection with the acquisition of Quintex Utah, the Company recorded intangible assets of $4.2 million based on the valuation of Quintex Utah’s customer list, customer order backlog, non-compete contract and customer contracts. The intangible customer list is subject to a six-year amortization period beginning in July 2006, and the customer order backlog is subject to a two-month amortization period beginning in July 2006. The non-compete contract is subject to a five-year amortization period beginning in July 2006. The customer contracts are subject to 2 – 8 month amortization periods beginning in July 2006. The amortization expense recognized for the aforementioned intangible assets totaled $0.2 million through September 30, 2006.

~~Table~~The Company allocated the total purchase price of ~~Contents~~$10.2 million over the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and other intangible assets based on preliminary estimates.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Assuming ~~CONTAINER~~the ~~COMPANY~~STC, ~~LLC~~Mayfair, ~~AND~~SVP ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~and Quintex Utah acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented, the Company’s unaudited pro forma results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 would have been:

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005			2006		2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Net sales	$	215,494	$	209,925		$	660,989	$	643,355
Net income (loss)	$	15,843	$	(2,155	)	$	20,617	$	(15,313	)

~~(Unaudited)~~8

~~The~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Company~~CONTAINER ~~allocated~~COMPANY ~~the~~LLC ~~total~~AND ~~purchase~~SUBSIDIARIES price of $3.3 million, net of cash received of less than $0.1 million and including direct costs incurred for the acquisition that were paid during December 2005 totaling $0.1 million, over the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and other intangible assets based on preliminary estimates. The Company expects to finalize the SVP purchase price allocation by September 30, 2006.

~~Assuming~~NOTES ~~the~~TO ~~STC,~~CONDENSED ~~Mayfair~~CONSOLIDATED ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~SVP acquisitions~~STATEMENTS ~~occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented, the Company’s unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 would have been:~~

	Three MonthsEnded
	March 31, 2005
	(Amounts inthousands)
Net Sales	$	211,758
Net Loss	$	(10,927	)

(Unaudited)

4. GOODWILL

The following table presents the activity in goodwill for the ~~first~~nine ~~quarter~~months ~~ending~~ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2006 (amounts in thousands):

Balance at January 1, 2006	$	219,427
Purchase price allocation adjustments		(352	)
Quintex acquisition		2,534
Balance at March 31, 2006	$	219,075
Purchase price allocation adjustments		(478	)
Balance at September 30, 2006	$	221,483

The Company allocated ~~the excess of the 2005~~ acquisition costs for STC, Mayfair, SVP and ~~SVP~~Quintex Utah over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to goodwill. During the first ~~quarter~~nine months of 2006, anadjustments ~~adjustment~~ totaling $0.23 million ~~was~~were made to the purchase price allocation of SVP to ~~record~~finalize intangible assets for the customer list and ~~customer~~ customer order backlog and adjustments totaling $0.2 million were made to the purchase price allocation of STC to record the discount related to the acquired promissory notes.

5. INTANGIBLES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

~~Intangible~~Intangibles and other assets consisted of the following at ~~March~~ September 3130, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

	March 31,2006			December 31,2005
	September 30,2006			December 31,2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Deferred financing costs	$	18,~~559~~620		$	18,559
Customer owned molds, deposits and other		810,~~475~~402			8,608
Intangible assets		711,~~100~~437			6,961
		34,134			34,128
		40,459			34,128
Less accumulated amortization		(1417,~~032~~754	)		(12,900	)
	$	2022,~~102~~705		$	21,228

~~The~~9 Company’s intangible assets consist primarily of customer lists, which are amortized over the estimated useful life of the respective assets, which is 5-7 years. The intangible customer lists resulted from the STC, Mayfair and SVP acquisitions and are carried at a cost of $6.2 and $6.0 million as of March 31, 2006 and

8CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Table~~NOTES ofTO ~~Contents~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~CONSOLIDATED~~(Unaudited) ~~CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES~~The TOCompany’s ~~CONDENSED~~intangible ~~CONSOLIDATED~~assets ~~FINANCIAL~~consist ~~STATEMENTS—~~primarily of customer lists, which are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets of 5-7 years. The customer lists resulted from the STC, Mayfair, SVP and Quintex Utah acquisitions and are carried at a cost of $9.8 and $6.0 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The remaining intangible assets consist of both customer contracts acquired through the normal course of business and non-compete agreements from past acquisitions, which are carried at a cost of $ 1.6 and $1.0 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives of these assets, which is 1-5 years. The accumulated amortization on the intangible assets was $2.3 and $1.2 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The aggregate amortization of intangible assets for each of the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.6 million and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 it was $1.3 and $2.0 million, respectively. Of this amortization, approximately $0.1 and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $0.2 and $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to customer contract amortization, which is an offset to net sales. The annual estimated amortization expense for the aforementioned intangible assets at September 30, 2006 is as follows (~~Continued~~amounts in thousands):

(Unaudited)


Three months ending December 31, 2006	$	555
Year ending December 31,
2007		1,894
2008		1,888
2009		1,854
2010		1,306
2011 and thereafter		1,601

	$	9,098

~~December 31, 2005, respectively~~6. ~~The~~INVENTORIES remaining intangible assets consist of both customer contracts acquired through the normal course of business and non-compete intangible assets from past acquisitions, which are carried at a cost of $0.9 and $1.0 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful life of these assets, which is 1-5 years. The accumulated amortization on the intangible assets was $1.5 and $1.2 million as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The aggregate amortization of intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 was $0.3 and $0.4 million, respectively. Of this amortization, approximately $40,000 and $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively, related to customer contract amortization, which is an offset to sales. The annual estimated amortization expense for the aforementioned intangible assets at March 31, 2006 is as follows (amounts in thousands):

Nine months ending December 31, 2006	$	981
Year ending December 31,
2007		1,142
2008		1,142
2009		1,108
2010		563
2011 and thereafter		656
	$	5,592

Inventories consisted of the following at September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005:

6. INVENTORIES


	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Raw materials	$	28,398	$	27,044
Finished goods		23,640		27,974

	$	52,038	$	55,018

~~Inventories~~7. ~~consisted~~OTHER ofCURRENT ~~the~~ASSETS ~~following at March 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005:~~

	March 31,2006		December 31,2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Finished goods	$	26,387	$	27,697
Raw materials		23,071		27,242
	$	49,458	$	54,939

Other current assets consisted of the following at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Rebate receivables	$	10,910	$	17,077
Other current assets		9,100		9,012
Prepaid expenses		2,348		3,304

	$	22,358	$	29,393

~~Property~~10 ~~and equipment consisted of the following at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005:~~

	March 31,2006			December 31,2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Machinery and equipment	$	383,257		$	383,167
Leasehold improvements		21,994			21,291
Buildings		21,193			21,001
Furniture and equipment		13,234			13,198
Land		8,884			8,884
Capital leases		803			803
		449,365			448,344
Less accumulated depreciation		(210,790	)		(201,977	)
		238,575			246,367
Construction in progress		19,712			12,967
	$	258,287		$	259,334

CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

9NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Table~~(Unaudited) ~~of Contents~~

~~CONSOLIDATED~~8. ~~CONTAINER~~PROPERTY ~~COMPANY LLC~~ AND ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~EQUIPMENT, NET

~~NOTES~~Property TOand ~~CONDENSED~~equipment ~~CONSOLIDATED~~consisted ~~FINANCIAL~~of ~~STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~the following at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Machinery and equipment	$	386,709		$	383,167
Leasehold improvements		22,336			21,291
Buildings		22,076			21,001
Furniture and equipment		14,791			13,198
Land		8,884			8,884
Capital leases		803			803

		455,599			448,344
Less accumulated depreciation		(219,953	)		(201,977	)

		235,646			246,367
Construction in progress		18,503			12,967

	$	254,149		$	259,334

89. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at ~~March 31~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

	March 31,2006		December 31,2005
	September 30,2006		December 31,2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Rebates accrual	$	18,105	$	20,860
Employee compensation and benefits	$	13,714	$	11,343
Employee compensation and benefits		9,660		11,343
Rebates accrual		12,304		12,727
Other accruals		68,~~419~~615		6,163
Accrued pension		65,~~189~~580		6,189
Accrued interest		4,~~148~~105		8,790
Accrued taxes		1,~~966~~403		2,305
	$	4645,~~487~~721	$	5547,~~650~~517

910. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following at ~~March~~September 3130, 2006, and December 31, 2005:

	March 31,2006			December 31,2005
	September 30, 2006					December 31, 2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
	(Amounts inthousands)			Interest Rate		(Amounts inthousands)			Interest Rate
Senior credit facility—term loans—8.4%	$	216,150		$	216,700
Senior credit facility—term loans	$	215,050		10.5%		$	216,700		7.5%
Senior secured discount notes—10 3/4%		182,398			177,685
Senior secured discount notes		192,202		10.75%			177,685		10.75%
Senior subordinated notes—10 1/8%		185,000			185,000
Senior subordinated notes		185,000		10.125%			185,000		10.125%
Promissory notes—6.0%—6.3%		3,497			4,246
Promissory notes		11,695		6.0%-9.3%			4,246		2.9%-6.0%
Capital lease obligations		~~541~~441			~~591~~		591
		587,586			584,222
		604,388					584,222
Less current portion		(310,~~401~~048	)		~~(4,068~~	)	(218,568	)
	$	~~584~~594,~~185~~340		$	~~580,154~~	$	365,654

~~Senior~~11 Credit Facility—The senior credit facility consists of a term loan with a total original principal amount of $220.0 million and a $45.0 million revolving credit facility (“the Revolver”). The term loan and Revolver are summarized below:

~~Term~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Loan~~CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~The~~NOTES ~~term~~TO ~~loan~~CONDENSED ~~was originally~~CONSOLIDATED ~~$220.0~~FINANCIAL ~~million~~STATEMENTS in principal, of which $216.2 million was outstanding at March 31, 2006. The Company is required to repay the term loan in quarterly installments of $550,000 that commenced on September 30, 2004 and continue through September 2008, with the remaining balance due December 15, 2008.

~~Revolver~~(Unaudited)

At ~~March~~September 3130, 2006, ~~the~~events ~~Company~~of ~~had~~default ~~approximately~~existed ~~$8.1~~under ~~million~~the terms of ~~funded~~the ~~borrowings~~Company’s ~~outstanding~~senior credit onfacility, due in part to (a) provisions requiring the ~~Revolver,~~Company to maintain its financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and ~~$9.1~~(b) noncompliance ~~million~~in ~~was~~two ~~reserved~~quarters ~~for~~of 2005 with ~~outstanding~~financial ~~standby~~covenants ~~letters~~based on the restatement of ~~credit,~~the ~~leaving~~Company’s ~~$27~~financial statements.8 ~~million~~The ~~available~~restatement ~~for~~is ~~future~~discussed ~~borrowings~~in Note 18. ~~The~~As ~~outstanding~~a ~~standby~~result ~~letters~~of the events of default, the Company classified its debt under the senior credit ~~were~~facility ~~reduced~~as toa $9current liability at December 31, 2005.1 ~~million~~Subsequently, aton October 13, 2006, the ~~end~~Company obtained a waiver of ~~March~~the ~~2006~~events ~~from~~of ~~$12~~default in the First Amendment and Waiver to Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”).3 ~~million~~Accordingly, atthe Company has recorded the ~~end~~current portion of ~~December~~debt ~~2005~~based ~~due~~on tothe ~~a reduction~~contractual maturity as of ~~collateral~~September 30, ~~required~~2006. bySee Note 20 for further discussion of the ~~Company’s~~First Amendment.

10Senior Credit Facility—The senior credit facility consists of a term loan with a total original principal amount of $220.0 million and a $45.0 million revolving credit facility (“the Revolver”). The term loan and Revolver are summarized below:

~~Table~~Term ofLoan ~~Contents~~

~~CONSOLIDATED~~The ~~CONTAINER~~term ~~COMPANY~~loan ~~LLC~~was ~~AND~~originally ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~$220.0 million in principal, of which $215.1 million was outstanding at September 30, 2006. The Company is required to repay the term loan in quarterly installments of $550,000 that commenced on September 30, 2004 and continue through September 2008, with the remaining balance due December 15, 2008. The estimated fair value of the term loans was $215.1 million and $216.7 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

~~NOTES~~Revolver ~~TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~At September 30, 2006, the Company had $21.0 million of funded borrowings outstanding on the Revolver, and $8.6 million was reserved for outstanding standby letters of credit, leaving $15.4 million available for future borrowings. The events of default on our senior credit facility, discussed above, resulted in the Company being unable to utilize borrowings under the Revolver from the date the Company gave notice of the events of default to the administrative agent until the First Amendment was obtained on October 13, 2006. The Revolver will terminate on December 15, 2008 and all outstanding revolving loans will be due and payable on that date. The Revolver bore interest at a rate of 11.0% and 10.0% as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

~~worker’s~~The ~~compensation~~senior ~~insurance~~credit ~~carrier~~facility asalso aprovides ~~result~~for ofmandatory ~~the~~repayments ~~Company’s~~from ~~improved~~the ~~safety~~net ~~record.~~proceeds ~~The~~of ~~Revolver~~certain ~~will~~asset ~~terminate~~sales, ondebt ~~December 15~~issuances, ~~2008 and~~a ~~all~~portion ~~outstanding~~of ~~revolving~~equity ~~loans~~issuances, ~~will~~a beportion ~~due~~of ~~and~~excess ~~payable~~cash onflow ~~that~~and ~~date.~~certain Asproperty insurance ofrecoveries ~~March 31,~~and ~~2006,~~condemnation ~~the~~events. ~~Revolver~~No ~~bore~~such ~~interest~~payments atwere arequired ~~weighted~~for ~~average~~the ~~rate~~period ofended ~~approximately~~September 30, 102006.~~5%.~~

~~The~~Senior Secured ~~senior~~Discount ~~credit~~Notes—In ~~facility~~May ~~also~~2004, ~~provides~~the ~~for~~Company ~~mandatory~~completed ~~repayments~~an ~~from~~offering ~~the~~of ~~net~~$207.0 ~~proceeds~~million aggregate principal amount at maturity of ~~certain~~10 3/4% ~~asset~~senior ~~sales~~secured discount notes, ~~debt~~which ~~issuances~~generated proceeds of approximately $150.1 million at issuance. As of September 30, a2006, ~~portion~~the accreted value of ~~equity~~the notes, upon which interest expense was ~~issuances~~calculated, awas ~~portion~~$192.2 million. The notes will mature on June 15, 2009. The fair value of ~~excess~~the ~~cash~~Company’s ~~flow~~long-term ~~and~~debt ~~insurance~~is ~~recoveries~~based ~~and~~on ~~condemnation~~quoted ~~events~~market prices. NoThe ~~such~~estimated ~~payments~~fair ~~were~~value ~~required~~of ~~for~~ the ~~period~~senior ~~ended~~secured ~~March~~discount notes was $198.7 million and $174.9 million as of September 3130, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

Senior ~~Secured Discount~~ Subordinated Notes—InThe ~~May 2004, the Company completed an offering of $207.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of 10 3/4%~~ senior ~~secured~~subordinated ~~discount~~ notes, ~~which~~that ~~generated~~were ~~proceeds~~issued ofon ~~approximately $150.1 million at issuance. As of March~~July 312, ~~2006~~1999, ~~the~~have ~~accreted~~an original face value of ~~the notes, upon which interest expense was calculated, was~~ $~~182~~185.40 million. ~~The~~and ~~notes~~are ~~will~~due ~~mature~~in full on ~~June~~July 15, 2009. The ~~fair~~notes ~~value~~bear ofinterest ~~the~~at ~~Company’s~~a ~~long-term~~fixed ~~debt is based on quoted market prices. At March 31, 2006, the estimated fair~~ ~~value of the senior secured discount notes was $190.4 million.~~

~~Senior~~12 Subordinated Notes—The senior subordinated notes that were issued on July 2, 1999, have an original face value of $185.0 million and are due in full on July 15, 2009. The notes bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 10 1/8%, payable semiannually in July and January of each year. At March 31, 2006, the estimated fair value of the senior subordinated notes was $162.3 million.

~~The~~CONSOLIDATED ~~senior~~CONTAINER ~~credit~~COMPANY ~~facility,~~LLC ~~the senior~~AND ~~secured~~SUBSIDIARIES discount notes, and/or the senior subordinated notes contain covenants that restrict, among other things, the Company’s ability to: (i) make certain restricted payments; (ii) incur additional debt or issue preferred equity; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions on the Company’s equity interests or repurchase the Company’s equity interests; (iv) repurchase subordinated indebtedness; (v) issue stock of subsidiaries; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) create liens on the Company’s assets; (viii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (ix) merge or consolidate with another company; (x) sell, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; (xi) enter sales and leaseback transactions; and (xii) make capital expenditures above specified levels. The senior credit facility has financial maintenance covenants regarding first-lien debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), total secured debt to consolidated EBITDA and interest coverage. Additionally, the senior credit facility contains a maximum capital spending covenant. At March 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the senior credit facility, the senior secured discount notes and the senior subordinated notes, including those related to the acquisitions that occurred during 2005.

~~Promissory~~NOTES ~~Notes—On~~TO ~~February 11,~~CONDENSED ~~2005,~~CONSOLIDATED ~~just~~FINANCIAL ~~prior~~STATEMENTS to the Company’s acquisition of STC as described in Note 3, STC issued four promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $1.6 million to its shareholders in consideration of the repurchase of an aggregate 2,200 shares of common stock of STC. The notes bear interest at a stated rate of 2.9% per annum. The Company’s effective interest rate at the time was approximately 6.3%, and thus, the Company recorded a discount on notes payable. The discount is being amortized over the life of the notes using the interest method. All outstanding and unpaid principal and interest are due and payable on January 1, 2008.

~~On June 29, 2005, just prior to the Company’s acquisition of Mayfair~~ (~~accomplished through a merger of Mayfair into STC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company~~Unaudited) as described in Note 3, Mayfair issued two promissory notes, one for $2.0 million and an additional note for $0.7 million, to its shareholder in consideration of the repurchase of an aggregate 560 shares of common stock of Mayfair. As a result of the acquisition, the promissory notes become the obligation of STC. The $2.0 million note bears interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum and STC is required to repay principal and interest in two equal installments on July 1, 2006 and July 1, 2007. All outstanding principal and interest on the $0.7 million note was repaid on March 15, 2006.

11 interest rate of 10 1/8%, payable semiannually in July and January of each year. The estimated fair value of the senior subordinated notes was $176.7 million and $116.6 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

~~Table~~The senior credit facility, the senior secured discount notes, and the senior subordinated notes contain covenants that restrict, among other things, the Company’s ability to: (i) make certain restricted payments; (ii) incur additional debt or issue preferred equity; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions on the Company’s equity interests or repurchase the Company’s equity interests; (iv) repurchase subordinated indebtedness; (v) issue stock of ~~Contents~~subsidiaries; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) create liens on the Company’s assets; (viii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (ix) merge or consolidate with another company; (x) sell, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; (xi) enter sales and leaseback transactions; and (xii) make capital expenditures above specified levels. The senior credit facility has financial maintenance covenants regarding first-lien debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), total secured debt to consolidated EBITDA and interest coverage. Additionally, the senior credit facility contains a maximum capital expenditures covenant. At September 30, 2006, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants under the senior credit facility, including provisions requiring it to maintain its books and records in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the restatement discussed in Note 18 caused the Company to not be in compliance with certain financial covenants for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005. The Company was, however, in compliance with the financial covenants for the period ended September 30, 2006. The Company has secured a waiver as of October 13, 2006 for the events of non-compliance as discussed in Note 20. In addition, at September 30, 2006, the Company was not in compliance with a covenant under its indentures requiring timely delivery of certain financial information to the holders of its senior secured discount notes and the senior subordinated notes. On September 13, 2006, the Company received a notice of default from the trustee under its indenture related to the senior subordinated notes. The Company’s failure to comply with the reporting requirements under its indentures does not consititute an “event of default” under the indentures unless it fails to cure such default within sixty days following notice to the Company of such failure. The Company cured such default as of October 2, 2006 when it delivered the required financial information.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Promissory Notes—On ~~CONTAINER~~February 11, ~~COMPANY~~2005, ~~LLC~~just ~~AND~~prior ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~to the Company’s February 15, 2005 acquisition of STC, STC issued four promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $1.6 million to its shareholders in consideration of the repurchase of an aggregate 2,200 shares of common stock of STC. The notes bear interest at a stated rate of 2.9% per annum. The Company’s effective interest rate at the time was approximately 6.3%, and thus, the Company recorded a discount on notes payable. The discount is being amortized over the life of the notes using the interest method. All outstanding and unpaid principal and interest are due and payable on January 1, 2008.

~~NOTES~~On TOJune 29, ~~CONDENSED~~2005, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~just ~~FINANCIAL~~prior ~~STATEMENTS—~~to the Company’s acquisition of Mayfair (~~Continued~~accomplished through a merger of Mayfair into STC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) as described in Note 3, Mayfair issued two promissory notes, one for $2.0 million and an additional note for $0.7 million, to its shareholder in consideration of the repurchase of an aggregate 560 shares of common stock of Mayfair. As a result of the acquisition, the promissory notes become the obligation of STC. The $2.0 million note, of which $1.0 million was outstanding at September 30, 2006, bears interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum and STC is required to repay the remaining principal and interest on July 1, 2007. All outstanding principal and interest on the $0.7 million note was repaid on March 15, 2006.

Holdings, the Company, and Consolidated Container Company LP (~~Unaudited~~“LP”), (collectively, “CCC”), and Dean Foods entered into a Settlement Agreement dated August 22, 2006, as amended on August 25, 2006 (the

~~Scheduled~~13 ~~Maturities—The scheduled annual maturities of long-term debt at March 31, 2006, were as follows (amounts in thousands):~~

Nine months ending December 31, 2006	$	2,810
Year ending December 31,
2007		3,370
2008		213,977
2009		392,112
2010		10
Total amounts due at maturity	$	612,279
Less: Unamortized discount on notes		(24,693	)
	$	587,586

CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~10.~~NOTES ~~COMMITMENTS~~TO ~~AND~~CONDENSED ~~CONTINGENCIES~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~The~~(Unaudited) Company and its subsidiaries are parties, in the ordinary course of business, to certain environmental and other claims and litigation. In management’s opinion, the settlement of such matters is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. For further discussion of these matters, please see Item 1 of Part II of this report.

In “Settlement ~~1997,~~Agreement”) ~~the~~regarding ~~Company entered~~possible ~~into~~breaches anunder ~~agreement~~bottle and resin supply agreements with aDean ~~former~~Foods ~~management~~and ~~shareholder~~its affiliates. ~~The~~Under ~~agreement~~the ~~calls~~terms ~~for~~of the ~~payments~~Settlement ofAgreement, upCCC has agreed to pay $310.40 million ifinclusive ~~specified~~of ~~investment~~interest ~~returns~~to ofDean ~~Reid~~Foods ~~Plastics~~in ~~are~~accordance ~~achieved,~~with ~~and~~the upfollowing toschedule: $4.80 million ~~upon~~at ana ~~initial~~date ~~public~~to ~~offering~~be ofdetermined ~~Reid Plastics~~prior ~~Holdings~~to December 31, if2006; ~~specified~~$3.0 ~~investment~~million ~~returns~~on ~~are~~or ~~achieved~~before August 22, 2007; and $3.0 million on or ~~specified~~before ~~qualified~~August 22, ~~sales~~2008. ofThe ~~Reid~~Settlement ~~Plastics~~Agreement ~~Holdings~~has byno ~~Vestar~~stated ~~Reid~~rate of interest, thus the ~~parent~~Company ofrecorded ~~Reid~~a ~~Plastics~~discount ~~Holdings~~on ~~and~~the anote ~~controlled~~payable ~~affiliate~~using ofthe ~~Vestar~~Company’s ~~Capital~~effective ~~Partners~~interest ~~III,~~rate Lat the time of approximately 9.P3%. The ~~Company made~~discount nois ~~payment~~being ~~for~~amortized over the ~~three~~life ~~months~~of ~~ended~~the ~~March~~note using the interest method. At September 3130, 2006, ~~and~~the ~~2005~~accreted ~~under~~value of the ~~terms~~note ofwas $9.2 million which was recorded as a promissory note in long term debt on the condensed ~~1997~~consolidated ~~agreement~~balance sheet.

InScheduled ~~July~~Maturities—The ~~2004,~~scheduled ~~the management~~annual ~~committee~~maturities of ~~Holdings adopted a~~ long-term ~~incentive~~debt ~~plan (“LTIP”) for some of the key employees of the Company. Under the LTIP, if a liquidity event were to occur, then the compensation committee of Holdings’ management~~at ~~committee would approve cash payments to participants based on formulas which would take into account~~September 30, ~~among other factors~~2006, ~~the~~were ~~appreciation~~as infollows ~~value~~(amounts ~~of the member units of Holdings, the allocation percentage granted to each participant, and the vesting of each award. As defined~~ in ~~the LTIP, a liquidity event includes~~thousands):

• the sale of units of Holdings held by Vestar Packaging LLC and its affiliates, for cash or marketable securities, resulting in Vestar Packaging LLC and its affiliates’ owning less than a majority of the total voting power of Holdings;


Three months ending December 31, 2006	$	4,597
Year ending December 31,
2007		6,370
2008		216,977
2009		392,113
2010		10

Total amounts due at maturity	$	620,067
Less: Unamortized discount on notes		(15,679	)

	$	604,388

•11. ~~the~~COMMITMENTS ~~sale~~AND ofCONTINGENCIES ~~substantially all of the assets of the Company or of Holdings; or~~

•The anCompany ~~initial~~and ~~public~~its ~~offering~~subsidiaries ofare parties, in the ~~member~~ordinary ~~units~~course of ~~Holdings~~business, to certain environmental and other claims and litigation. In management’s opinion, the settlement of such matters is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

~~Each~~In ~~participant’s~~1997, ~~award~~the isCompany ~~subject~~entered into an agreement with a former management shareholder. The agreement calls for payments of up to ~~reduction~~$3.4 ormillion ~~forfeiture~~if ~~due~~specified investment returns of Reid Plastics are achieved, and up to ~~certain~~$4.8 ~~events~~million ~~including~~upon ~~termination~~an initial public offering of ~~the~~Reid ~~participant’s~~Plastics ~~employment~~Holdings, ~~with~~if ~~the~~specified ~~Company~~investment ~~prior~~returns toare achieved, or specified qualified sales of Reid Plastics Holdings by Vestar Reid, the ~~occurrence~~parent of Reid Plastics Holdings and a ~~liquidity~~controlled ~~event~~affiliate of Vestar Capital Partners III, ~~depending~~L.P. onThe ~~the~~Company ~~reason~~made no payment for ~~such~~ ~~termination~~the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 under the terms of ~~employment~~the 1997 agreement.

12In July 2004, the management committee of Holdings adopted a long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) for some of the key employees of the Company. Under the LTIP, if a liquidity event were to occur, then the compensation committee of Holdings’ management committee would approve cash payments to participants based on formulas which would take into account, among other factors, the appreciation in value of the member units of Holdings, the allocation percentage granted to each participant, and the vesting of each award. As defined in the LTIP, a liquidity event includes:

~~Table~~• the sale of ~~Contents~~units of Holdings held by Vestar Packaging LLC and its affiliates, for cash or marketable securities, resulting in Vestar Packaging LLC and its affiliates’ owning less than a majority of the total voting power of Holdings;

~~CONSOLIDATED~~• ~~CONTAINER~~the ~~COMPANY~~sale ~~LLC~~of ~~AND~~substantially ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~all of the assets of the Company or of Holdings; or

~~NOTES~~• TOan ~~CONDENSED~~initial ~~CONSOLIDATED~~public ~~FINANCIAL~~offering ~~STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~of the member units of Holdings.

~~(Unaudited)~~14

~~The~~CONSOLIDATED ~~aggregate~~CONTAINER ofCOMPANY ~~all~~LLC ~~awards~~AND ~~granted~~SUBSIDIARIES under the LTIP (which includes two separate pools referred to as Bonus Pool-A and Bonus Pool-B) is limited to a maximum payout of approximately $11.8 million, which includes maximum potential payouts of approximately $8.8 million under Bonus Pool-A and approximately $3.0 million under Bonus Pool-B. The compensation committee of Holdings’ management committee administers the plan. In the first quarter of 2006, the compensation committee approved awards totaling 96% of the shares of Bonus Pool-B and a reallocation of Bonus Pool-A shares that were forfeited by three employees upon leaving the Company. Such reallocation has been made to those Bonus Pool-A participants who are currently employed by the Company. Also in the first quarter of 2006, the compensation committee approved an advance of a portion of Bonus Pool-A to participants who remain employed through the time of the advance, which will be paid no later than the end of the first quarter of 2007. The advance will equal 50% of an estimate of Bonus Pool-A. Such estimate will be calculated as if there were a liquidity event on December 31, 2006. Details of the advance have not been finalized as of the filing of this report.

~~11.~~NOTES ~~RELATED~~TO ~~PARTY~~CONDENSED ~~TRANSACTIONS~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~The~~(Unaudited) Company had bottle and resin sales to Dean Foods of approximately $63.0 and $59.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Accounts receivable from Dean Foods, net of amounts owed at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 amounted to approximately $15.4 and $24.4 million, respectively.

~~12.~~Each ~~GUARANTOR~~participant’s ~~FINANCIAL~~award ~~STATEMENTS~~is subject to reduction or forfeiture due to certain events including termination of the participant’s employment with the Company prior to the occurrence of a liquidity event, depending on the reason for such termination of employment.

~~Separate~~The ~~financial statements~~aggregate of all awards granted under the ~~subsidiary~~LTIP ~~guarantors~~(which ~~are~~includes ~~not~~two ~~included~~separate ~~herewith~~pools asreferred ~~management~~to ~~has~~as ~~determined~~Bonus ~~that~~Pool-A ~~such~~and ~~information~~Bonus Pool-B) is ~~not~~limited ~~material~~ to ~~investors~~a maximum ~~because~~payout ~~(i) the~~of ~~subsidiary~~approximately ~~guarantors~~$11.8 ~~constitute~~million, ~~substantially~~which ~~all~~includes maximum potential payouts of ~~the~~approximately ~~Company~~$8.8 million under Bonus Pool-A and approximately $3.0 million under Bonus Pool-B. The compensation committee of Holdings’s ~~direct~~management ~~and~~committee ~~indirect~~administers ~~subsidiaries~~the ~~and~~plan. ~~have~~In ~~fully~~the ~~and~~first ~~unconditionally~~quarter ~~guaranteed~~of 2006, the ~~notes~~compensation oncommittee aapproved ~~joint~~awards totaling 96% of the shares of Bonus Pool-B and ~~several~~a ~~basis~~reallocation of Bonus Pool-A shares that were forfeited by three employees upon leaving the Company. Such reallocation has been made to those Bonus Pool-A participants who are currently employed by the Company. Also in the first quarter of 2006, ~~and~~the ~~(ii) Holdings~~compensation iscommittee approved an advance of a ~~holding~~portion ~~company~~of ~~with~~Bonus noPool-A ~~assets~~to participants who remain employed through the time of the advance, ~~operations~~which orwill ~~cash~~be ~~flow~~paid ~~separate~~no ~~from~~later ~~its~~than ~~investment~~the inend of the ~~Company~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~its~~of 2007. The advance will equal 50% of an estimate of Bonus Pool-A. Such estimate will be calculated as if there were a liquidity event on ~~subsidiaries~~December 31, 2006. In October 2006, the management committee approved the terms of the advance.

13On September 15, 2006, the Company became aware of a recall of one of its customer’s products contained in a bottle produced by the Company. ~~SHARE-BASED~~Although ~~COMPENSATION~~no claim has been asserted against the Company, management is currently evaluating the facts surrounding the recall. At the current time, to the Company cannot estimate the impact of a potential claim, if any, to the consolidated financial statements.

~~At the formation of the Company, Holdings adopted a 1999 Unit Option Plan to provide some of the Company’s key employees with options to acquire member units of Holdings~~12. AtRELATED ~~March 31, 2006, there were 27,690,000 options available under this plan and two amended~~PARTY ~~and~~TRANSACTIONS restated versions of the plan (collectively referred to below as the “CCH Option Plan”). As of March 31, 2006, there were 23,866,807 options outstanding with an average exercise price of $0.05 per member unit. The exact pricing, performance criteria, vesting terms and redemption of options granted under the CCH Option Plan are governed by individual unit option agreements between the employee and Holdings and, if the options are exercised, the terms of the options will be governed by special unit acquisition, ownership and redemption agreements. However, generally the options vest ratably on a daily or an annual basis over a five-year period and the options have a contractual life of ten years, unless the employee terminates prior to that time.

InThe ~~addition~~Company tohad ~~options~~bottle tosales ~~purchase~~and ~~member~~gross ~~units~~brokered inresin ~~Holdings~~sales ~~that~~to ~~were~~Dean ~~granted~~Foods toof ~~some~~approximately of$63.3 ~~the~~and ~~Company’s key~~$51.7 ~~employees~~million ~~under~~for the three ~~CCH~~months ~~Option~~ended ~~Plan~~September 30, ~~certain~~2006 ofand ~~the~~2005, ~~Company’s~~respectively, ~~current~~and $183.0 and ~~former~~$160.0 ~~employees~~million ~~hold~~for ~~options~~the tonine ~~purchase~~months ~~member~~ended ~~units~~September 30, of2006 ~~Holdings~~and ~~that~~2005, ~~were~~respectively. ~~issued~~The inbrokered ~~exchange~~resin ~~for~~sales ~~previously~~are ~~owned~~included ~~Franklin~~on ~~Plastics~~a ~~options.~~net ~~Under~~basis ~~this~~in ~~plan, called~~related party sales in the ~~Consolidated~~condensed ~~Container~~consolidated ~~Holdings~~statement ~~LLC~~of ~~Replacement~~operations ~~Units~~and ~~Option~~comprehensive ~~Plan~~income ~~for~~(loss). ~~Options~~See ~~Issued~~additional ~~Pursuant~~discussion toof the ~~Franklin~~accounting ~~Plastics~~for ~~Inc.~~brokered ~~1998~~resin ~~Stock~~at ~~Option~~Note ~~Plan~~19. ~~(the~~Accounts ~~“Franklin~~receivable ~~Replacement~~from ~~Option~~Dean ~~Plan”),~~Foods ~~the~~at ~~rights~~September 30, to2006 ~~acquire~~and ~~129~~December 31,~~658~~ ~~member~~2005 ~~units~~amounted ~~were~~to ~~outstanding~~approximately at$24.9 ~~March 31~~million and $33.9 million, ~~2006~~respectively. ~~The~~Amounts ~~compensation~~payable ~~committee~~to ofDean ~~the~~Foods ~~management~~at ~~committee~~September 30, ~~administers~~2006 ~~each~~and ofDecember 31, ~~these~~2005 ~~option~~were ~~plans~~approximately $2.8 and $31.4 million, respectively.

13On August 15, 2006, LP entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Dean Dairy Holdings, LLC, and Suiza Dairy Group, LLC, both subsidiaries of Dean Foods and collectively “Dean Foods Affiliates”. The terms of the Purchase Agreement are effective from July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2011. The Purchase Agreement replaces two previous purchase agreements that expired on July 2, 2006. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, LP will remain Dean Foods Affiliates’ primary outside supplier of plastic containers while gaining the opportunity to enhance its current position with Dean Foods Affiliates.

~~Table~~In August 2006, CCC and Dean Foods entered into a Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement was reached after CCC management initiated an internal review of ~~Contents~~its records relating to bottle and resin supply agreements with Dean Foods and its affiliates and initiated discussions with Dean Foods regarding possible breaches under such agreements. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, CCC agreed to pay $10.0 million ($9.1 million discounted) to Dean Foods which was less than the cumulative adjustments accrued as a result of the restatement discussed at Note 18 of $25.2 million, because of negotiated releases from a portion of such errors. The recording of the settlement in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 resulted in a one-time gain on

~~CONSOLIDATED~~15 ~~CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES~~CONSOLIDATED TOCONTAINER ~~CONDENSED~~COMPANY ~~CONSOLIDATED~~LLC ~~FINANCIAL~~AND ~~STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~SUBSIDIARIES

~~(Unaudited)~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As(Unaudited) these options relate to the parent company’s securities, the expense has been reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and as a capital contribution in the parent company financial statements.

~~Historically,~~ settlement ~~the Company used the fair value provisions~~ of ~~Statement~~approximately ~~of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No~~$16. ~~123 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), to account for its share-based compensation plans. Effective January~~ 1, ~~2006, it adopted the SFAS No~~million. ~~123R,~~ ~~“Share-Based~~Pursuant ~~Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces SFAS 123. SFAS 123R applies~~ to ~~all~~the ~~share-based~~terms ~~payment~~of ~~transactions~~the inSettlement ~~which an entity acquires goods or services by issuing (or offering to issue) its shares~~Agreement, ~~share~~Dean ~~options,~~Foods orhas ~~other equity instruments. SFAS 123R requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements.~~

~~The~~agreed ~~Company~~to ~~applied~~waive ~~the~~any ~~modified~~and ~~prospective~~all ~~application~~claims ~~method~~it inmay ~~its adoption of SFAS 123R. Implementing SFAS 123R did not~~ have aagainst ~~material~~CCC ~~effect~~or onits ~~income.~~affiliates Arelated ~~cumulative~~to ~~effect~~all ofsupply ~~change~~agreements inbetween ~~accounting~~them ~~principle~~and ~~due~~relating to the ~~requirement~~period ~~to estimate the impact~~ of ~~expected~~time ~~forfeitures~~prior ~~at the grant date resulted in a benefit of approximately $12,000 in the first quarter 2006,~~to ~~which is included in selling~~July 1, ~~general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss)~~2006.

~~Because~~The ~~the~~ Company’s ~~member~~has ~~units~~other ~~are~~related ~~not~~party ~~publicly~~sales ~~traded,~~and ~~there~~purchases isin ~~no observable market price for its units or its options. Thus,~~ the ~~Company~~normal ~~selected~~course ~~the~~of ~~Black-Scholes~~business ~~option~~with ~~valuation~~companies ~~model~~affiliated ~~to estimate fair~~with ~~value,~~certain ~~which~~of ~~is consistent with~~ the ~~Company’s~~non-employee ~~valuation~~members ~~techniques~~of ~~previously~~our ~~utilized~~management ~~for the fair value application under SFAS 123~~committee. ~~This~~The ~~model requires an estimate of the volatility of the~~ Company’s ~~share~~consolidated ~~price,~~financial ~~however,~~statements ~~because~~include the ~~Company’s~~ ~~member~~following ~~units~~transactions: are not publicly traded, it determined that it is not practicable for it to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. Thus, the Company accounted for equity share options based on a value calculated using the historical volatility of an appropriate industry sector index instead of the expected volatility of the entity’s share price (the “calculated value”).

In• ~~determining~~Net ~~the~~sales ~~expense~~of to$2.2 ~~be recorded for options, the significant assumptions utilized in applying the Black-Scholes option valuation model are the risk-free interest rate, expected term, dividend yield,~~ and ~~expected~~ ~~volatility~~$2.0 ~~The~~million ~~risk-free~~for ~~interest~~three ~~rate~~months isended ~~the~~September implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximating the expected term used as the assumption in the model. The expected term of an option award is based on historical experience of similar awards. Because the Company has only been in existence since 199930, 2006 and ~~there have been very few option exercises in the history of the plan~~2005, ~~the Company elected to calculate the expected term of its options using the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options granted prior to December 21~~respectively, ~~2007 per~~and ~~SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14~~$5.~~D.2.~~6 ~~The~~million ~~historical volatility was calculated using the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Index~~ for ~~the~~each ~~Containers & Packaging subsector. The dividend yield~~ of the ~~index~~nine ~~was~~months ~~assumed~~ended toSeptember be30, ~~zero. The weighted average assumptions used by the Company in applying the Black-Scholes valuation model for option grants in the first quarter of~~ 2006 ~~are~~and ~~illustrated in the following table. No options were granted in the same period of~~ 2005:, respectively,

Risk-free interest rate	4.49	%
Expected life (years)	6.25
Expected volatility	26.1	%
Dividend yield	0.0	%

•

Purchases of raw materials of $0.5 and $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1.3 and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively,

~~The~~• ~~weighted~~Selling, ~~average~~general ~~grant-date~~and ~~calculated~~administrative ~~value~~expenses of ~~options~~less ~~granted~~than ~~during~~$.1 million in each of the ~~quarter~~three ~~was $0.07/share.~~and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and

14• Related party receivables of $1.7 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

~~Table~~13. ofGUARANTOR ~~Contents~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Separate ~~CONTAINER~~financial ~~COMPANY~~statements ~~LLC~~of ~~AND~~the ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~subsidiary guarantors are not included herewith as management has determined that such information is not material to investors because (i) the subsidiary guarantors constitute substantially all of the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the notes on a joint and several basis, and (ii) Holdings is a holding company with no assets, operations or cash flow separate from its investment in the Company and its subsidiaries.

~~NOTES~~14. TOSHARE-BASED ~~CONDENSED~~COMPENSATION ~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

At the formation of the Company, Holdings adopted a 1999 Unit Option Plan to provide some of the Company’s key employees with options to acquire member units of Holdings. At September 30, 2006, there were 24,008,628 options available under this plan and two amended and restated versions of the plan (~~Unaudited~~collectively referred to below as the “CCH Option Plan”). As of September 30, 2006, there were 19,954,776 options outstanding with an average exercise price of $0.05 per member unit. The exact pricing, performance criteria, vesting terms and redemption of options granted under the CCH Option Plan are governed by individual unit option agreements between the employee and Holdings and, if the options are exercised, the terms of the options will be governed by special unit acquisition, ownership and redemption agreements. However, generally the options vest ratably on a daily or an annual basis over a five-year period and the options have a contractual life of ten years, unless the employee terminates prior to that time.

~~The~~In ~~following~~addition ~~table~~to ~~summarizes~~options to purchase member units in Holdings that were granted to some of the Company’s ~~option~~key ~~transactions~~employees under the CCH Option Plan, certain of the Company’s current and former employees hold options to purchase member units of Holdings that were issued in exchange for previously owned Franklin Plastics options. Under this plan, called the ~~quarter~~Consolidated ~~ended~~Container ~~March 31~~Holdings LLC Replacement Units Option Plan for Options Issued Pursuant to the Franklin Plastics Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, ~~2006:~~the rights to acquire 126,715

	Options		WeightedAverageExercisePrice		WeightedAverageRemainingContractualTerm	AggregateIntrinsicValue
Outstanding January 1, 2006	16,177,657		$	0.09
Granted	5,310,500			0.05
Forfeited	(65,593	)		0.05
Expired	(457,957	)		0.05
Exercised	(158,142	)		0.05
Outstanding at March 31, 2006	20,806,465		$	0.08	8	$	6.3 million

~~The~~CONSOLIDATED ~~aggregate~~CONTAINER ~~intrinsic~~COMPANY ~~value~~LLC ofAND ~~options~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was approximately $48,000.~~

ANOTES ~~summary~~TO ofCONDENSED ~~the~~CONSOLIDATED ~~status~~FINANCIAL ofSTATEMENTS ~~the Company’s nonvested option shares as of March 31, 2006 and changes during the three months then ended is presented below:~~

	Options		WeightedAverageGrant-DateCalculated Value
Nonvested January 1, 2006	7,558,908		$	0.07
Granted	5,310,500			0.07
Vested	(744,040	)		0.10
Forfeited	(65,593	)		0.04
Nonvested at March 31, 2006	12,059,775		$	0.07

(Unaudited)

As member ofunits ~~March 31,~~were ~~2006,~~outstanding ~~there~~at ~~was~~September 30, $02006.6 ~~million~~The ~~of unrecognized~~ compensation ~~cost~~committee ~~related~~of ~~to nonvested~~the ~~option~~management ~~shares~~committee ~~that~~administers iseach ~~expected to be recognized over a weighted average period~~ of ~~4.6~~these ~~years.~~option plans.

~~The~~As ~~Company~~these ~~had~~options ~~8.7~~relate ~~million~~to ~~vested options~~the atparent ~~March~~company’s 31securities, ~~2006~~the ~~with~~expense ~~a weighted average exercise price of $0.12 per share~~ and a ~~weighted~~capital ~~average~~contribution ~~remaining~~from ~~contractual~~the ~~term~~parent ofcompany ~~six~~have ~~years.~~been reflected ~~The~~in ~~calculated value of options vested during~~ the ~~three~~Company’s ~~months~~condensed ~~ended~~consolidated ~~March~~financial ~~31,~~statements ~~2006~~from ~~was~~these ~~less than $0~~transactions.1 ~~million.~~

~~The~~Historically, the Company ~~recorded~~used ~~compensation~~the fair ~~cost~~value ~~for~~provisions ~~awards~~of ~~issued,~~SFAS ~~modified, repurchased, or cancelled after December~~No. ~~31,~~123 ~~2005 under~~“Accounting ~~the~~for ~~guidance~~Stock ~~found~~Based inCompensation” (“SFAS ~~123R.~~123”), ~~For~~to ~~awards~~account ~~issued~~for ~~prior~~its toshare-based ~~the~~compensation ~~effective~~plans. ~~date~~Effective January 1, ~~compensation~~2006, ~~costs~~it ~~were~~adopted ~~recorded~~SFAS ~~using~~No. 123R, “Share-Based ~~the~~Payments” (“SFAS ~~123 assumptions~~123R”), aswhich ~~adjusted~~replaces ~~for~~SFAS 123. ~~the~~SFAS 123R ~~effect~~applies ofto ~~estimating~~all ~~forfeitures.~~share-based ~~Under~~payment ~~both~~transactions ~~methods,~~in ~~expense~~which ~~has~~an ~~been recorded~~entity ~~over~~acquires agoods ~~requisite~~or ~~service~~services ~~period~~by ofissuing ~~five~~(or ~~years.~~offering ~~Compensation~~to ~~cost~~issue) ~~included~~its inshares, ~~net~~share options, ~~income~~or ~~for~~other ~~the~~equity ~~three~~instruments. ~~months~~SFAS ~~ended~~123R ~~March 31,~~requires ~~2006~~that ~~was~~the ~~approximately~~cost ~~$0.1~~resulting ~~million~~from ~~compared~~all toshare-based ~~$0.2~~payment ~~million~~transactions ~~included~~be recognized in ~~net loss for~~ the ~~three~~financial ~~months ended March 31, 2005~~statements.

15The Company applied the modified prospective application method in its adoption of SFAS 123R. Implementing SFAS 123R did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. A cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle due to the requirement to estimate the impact of expected forfeitures at the grant date resulted in a benefit of approximately $12,000 in the first quarter 2006, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the period ended September 30, 2006.

~~Table~~Because the Company’s member units are not publicly traded, there is no observable market price for its units or its options. Thus, the Company selected the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate fair value, which is consistent with the Company’s valuation techniques previously utilized for the fair value application under SFAS 123. This model requires an estimate of ~~Contents~~the volatility of the Company’s share price, however, because the Company’s member units are not publicly traded, it determined that it is not practicable for it to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. Thus, the Company accounted for equity share options based on a value calculated using the historical volatility of an appropriate industry sector index instead of the expected volatility of the entity’s share price (the “Calculated Value”).

~~CONSOLIDATED~~In ~~CONTAINER~~determining ~~COMPANY~~the ~~LLC~~expense ~~AND~~to ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~be recorded for options, the significant assumptions utilized in applying the Black-Scholes option valuation model are the risk-free interest rate, expected term, dividend yield, and expected volatility. The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximating the expected term used as the assumption in the model. The expected term of an option award is based on historical experience of similar awards. Because the Company has only been in existence since 1999, and there have been very few option exercises in the history of the plan, the Company elected to calculate the expected term of its options using the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options granted prior to December 21, 2007 per SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14.D.2. The historical volatility was calculated using the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Index for the Containers & Packaging subsector. The dividend yield of the index was assumed to be zero. The weighted average assumptions used by the Company in applying the Black-Scholes valuation model for option grants in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are illustrated in the following table. No options were granted in the three months ended September 30, 2006.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Risk-free interest rate	4.49	%
Expected life (years)	6.25
Expected volatility	26.1	%
Dividend yield	0.0	%

~~(Unaudited)~~17

~~14.~~CONSOLIDATED ~~PENSION~~CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND ~~POST-RETIREMENT~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~BENEFITS~~

~~The components~~NOTES ofTO ~~net~~CONDENSED ~~periodic~~CONSOLIDATED ~~benefit~~FINANCIAL ~~costs~~STATEMENTS ~~of the pension and other post-retirement benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:~~

	Pension Benefits						Other Post-RetirementBenefits
	Three MonthsEnded March 31,						Three MonthsEnded March 31,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Service cost	$	151		$	170		$	9		$	16
Interest cost		1,340			1,386			30			29
Expected return on plan assets		(1,518	)		(1,419	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			20			—			—
Recognized actuarial loss (gain)		826			742			(4	)		(9	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	799		$	899		$	35		$	36

(Unaudited)

The ~~Company~~weighted ~~previously~~average ~~disclosed~~grant-date inCalculated ~~its~~Value ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~options ~~for~~granted during the ~~year~~nine ~~ended~~months ~~December 31,~~ended ~~2005, that it expected to contribute $6.2 million to its defined benefit pension plans in 2006. As of March~~September 3130, 2006, was $10.~~4 million of contributions have been made~~07/share.

~~15.~~The ~~FIXED~~following ~~ASSET~~table ~~IMPAIRMENT~~summarizes the option transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:

In June 2005, the Company’s second largest customer, The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), ended one of their contracts with the Company, which would have otherwise expired on December 31, 2005, regarding polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) bottle production at the Company’s operation located at P&G’s Kansas City, Kansas facility. In 2004, this business accounted for $41.8 million or 5.5% of the Company’s sales. In exchange for the early exit from this contract, the Company received extensions on two other contracts with P&G including the continued supply of PET preforms to the Kansas City facility. Included in loss on disposal of assets in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2005, is a $3.2 million dollar charge related to the write-down of the assets at the Kansas City facility to their estimated sales price.


	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding January 1, 2006	16,177,657			$0.09
Granted	5,335,500			0.05
Forfeited	(195,841	)		0.05
Expired	(744,453	)		0.09
Exercised	(3,681,372	)		0.05

Outstanding at September 30, 2006	16,891,491		$	0.08	9	$	6.9 million

16The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $1.9 ~~INCOME~~million. ~~TAXES~~No options were exercised in the three months ended September 30, 2006.

AsA asummary ~~limited liability company, the Company does not pay U.S. federal income taxes under the provisions~~ of the ~~Internal Revenue code. Any taxable income or loss generated by the Company is distributed to its partners to be included in their tax returns. However, the amalgamation of~~status ~~two~~ of the Company’s ~~wholly~~nonvested ~~owned~~options ~~foreign~~as ~~subsidiaries in 2004 and the acquisitions~~ of ~~two U.S. domestic corporations during 2005~~September 30, ~~STC~~2006 and ~~Mayfair,~~changes ~~have~~during ~~made it necessary for~~ the ~~Company~~nine tomonths ~~calculate~~then ~~deferred~~ended ~~tax~~is ~~assets~~presented ~~and~~below: ~~liabilities pursuant to SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), for financial reporting purposes.~~

At March 31, 2006, Reid Canada, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, had net operating loss carryforwards of $3.2 million for income tax purposes that expire in years 2008 through 2016. These carryforwards were generated in Reid Canada, Inc.’s former sister company, Stewart/Walker Plastics Ltd., and pursuant to the amalgamation of Reid Canada, Inc. and Stewart/Walker Plastics Ltd., the net operating losses were owned by Reid Canada, Inc. A valuation allowance of $1.9 million was established against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss due to uncertainty regarding the entity’s ability to generate taxable income.


	Options		Weighted Average Grant-Date Calculated Value
Nonvested January 1, 2006	7,558,908		$0.07
Granted	5,335,500		0.07
Vested	(2,440,212	)	0.10
Forfeited	(195,841	)	0.03

Nonvested at September 30, 2006	10,258,355		$0.07

16As of September 30, 2006, there was $0.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested option shares that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.9 years.

~~Table~~The Company had 6.6 million vested options at September 30, 2006 with a weighted average exercise price of ~~Contents~~$0.14 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual term of eight years. The Calculated Value of options vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $0.1 and $0.3 million, respectively.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~The ~~CONTAINER~~Company ~~COMPANY~~recorded ~~LLC~~compensation ~~AND~~cost ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~for awards issued, modified, repurchased, or cancelled after December 31, 2005 under the guidance found in SFAS 123R. For awards issued prior to the effective date, compensation costs were recorded using the SFAS 123 assumptions, as adjusted for the effect of estimating forfeitures. Under both methods, expense has been recorded over a requisite service period of five years. Compensation cost included in net income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million, respectively compared to a benefit of $0.2 and expense of $0.1 million, respectively, included in net loss for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005.

~~NOTES~~18 ~~TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~The~~NOTES ~~provision~~TO ~~for~~CONDENSED ~~income~~CONSOLIDATED ~~taxes~~FINANCIAL ~~for~~STATEMENTS ~~the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:~~

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2006			2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Current (benefit) provision:
Federal	$	(104	)	$	37
State		—			14
Foreign		28			—
Total current (benefit) provision		(76	)		51
Deferred provision (benefit):
Federal		120			—
State		5			—
Foreign		5			(274	)
Total deferred provision (benefit)		130			(274	)
Total provision (benefit)	$	54		$	(223	)

(Unaudited)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes15. ~~Significant~~PENSION ~~components~~AND ofPOST-RETIREMENT ~~the~~BENEFITS ~~Company’s net deferred income taxes as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are as follows:~~

	March 31,2006			December 31,2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Current deferred tax assets:
Accruals and reserves	$	59		$	49
Inventories		(3	)		38
Net operating loss carryforwards		41			258
Total current deferred tax assets		97			345
Non-current deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards		1,098			1,107
Total non-current deferred tax assets		1,098			1,107
Valuation allowance		(664	)		(638	)
Net non-current deferred tax assets		434			469
Net deferred tax assets		531			814
Current deferred tax liabilities:
State taxes		13			20
Non-current deferred tax liabilities:
Fixed assets		910			924
Amortizable intangibles		1,972			2,075
Other		5			—
Total		2,887			2,999
Total deferred tax liabilities		2,900			3,019
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	(2,369	)	$	(2,205	)

The components of net periodic benefit costs of the pension and other post-retirement benefits for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

17. BUSINESS INTERRUPTION INSURANCE PROCEEDS


	Pension Benefits												Other Post-Retirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
	(Amounts in thousands)
Service cost	$	151		$	170		$	452		$	510		$	8		$	16		$	26		$	48
Interest cost		1,340			1,385			4,019			4,157			30			29			90			87
Expected return on plan assets		(1,518	)		(1,419	)		(4,554	)		(4,256	)		—			—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			20			—			60			—			—			—			—
Recognized actuarial loss (gain)		826			742			2,479			2,226			(3	)		(9	)		(11	)		(27	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	799		$	898		$	2,396		$	2,697		$	35		$	36		$	105		$	108

~~During~~The ~~the first quarter of 2006, the~~ Company ~~received~~previously ~~business~~disclosed ~~interruption~~in ~~insurance~~its ~~proceeds~~Annual ~~totaling~~Report ~~$2.0~~on ~~million~~Form ~~related~~10-K/A tofor the ~~hurricanes~~year inended December 31, 2005~~. The~~, ~~proceeds~~that ~~were~~it ~~recorded~~expected asto acontribute ~~reduction~~$6.2 million ofto ~~cost~~its ofdefined ~~sales~~benefit inpension ~~the~~plans ~~Company’s~~in ~~condensed~~2006. ~~consolidated~~As ~~statements~~ of ~~operations~~September 30, ~~and~~2006, ~~comprehensive~~$4.9 ~~income~~million ~~(loss)~~of ~~for~~contributions ~~the~~have ~~three~~been ~~months ended March 31, 2006~~made.

1716. FIXED ASSET IMPAIRMENT

~~Table~~The Company recognized impairment charges of ~~Contents~~less than $0.1 and $0.1 million for the three months ended and $1.1 and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to idle assets held at an equipment warehouse upon assessment that the carrying amount of the assets exceeded the net realizable value in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets.” The impairment charges are included in loss on disposal of assets and impairments in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

~~ITEM~~In June 22005, the Company’s second largest customer, The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), ended one of their contracts with the Company, which would have otherwise expired on December 31, 2005, regarding polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) bottle production at the Company’s operation located at P&G’s Kansas City, Kansas facility. ~~MANAGEMENT~~In 2004, this business accounted for $41.8 million or 5.5% of the Company’Ss ~~DISCUSSION~~sales. ~~AND~~In ~~ANALYSIS~~exchange OFfor ~~FINANCIAL~~the early ~~CONDITION~~exit ~~AND~~from ~~RESULTS~~this OFcontract, ~~OPERATIONS~~the Company received extensions on two other contracts with P&G including the continued supply of PET preforms to the Kansas City facility. Included in loss on disposal of assets and impairments in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, is a $2.6 million dollar charge related to the disposal of the assets at the Kansas City facility.

~~Overview~~ 17. BUSINESS INTERRUPTION INSURANCE PROCEEDS

WeThe Company ~~are~~received abusiness ~~leading~~interruption ~~North~~insurance ~~American~~proceeds ~~developer, manufacturer, and marketer~~ of ~~rigid~~$3.6 ~~plastic containers for many of the largest branded consumer products~~ and ~~beverage~~$7.6 ~~companies~~million induring the ~~world.~~three ~~We serve our customers with a wide range of manufacturing capabilities~~ and ~~services~~nine ~~through~~months aended ~~domestic~~September 30, ~~nationwide~~2006, ~~network~~respectively, ofrelated 54to ~~strategically~~hurricanes ~~located~~Rita ~~manufacturing facilities~~ and aKatrina ~~research, development and engineering center located~~ in ~~Atlanta, Georgia~~2005. InThe ~~addition~~proceeds, wewhich ~~have~~include ~~three international manufacturing facilities in Canada and Mexico. We sell containers to~~ the ~~dairy, water, juice & other beverage, household~~final ~~chemicals &~~settlement ~~personal~~for ~~care,~~these ~~agricultural & industrial~~claims, ~~food~~were ~~and~~recorded ~~automotive~~as ~~sectors.~~a ~~Our~~reduction ~~container~~of ~~product~~cost ~~line~~of ~~ranges~~sales in ~~size~~the ~~from~~Company’s ~~two-ounce~~condensed toconsolidated ~~six-gallon~~statements ~~containers and consists~~ of ~~single~~operations and ~~multi-layer~~comprehensive ~~containers~~income ~~made from a variety of plastic resins, including high density polyethylene~~ (~~“HDPE”~~loss), ~~PC,~~for ~~polypropylene,~~those ~~and PET~~periods.

~~Management~~19 ~~believes that the following factors are critical to our success:~~

•CONSOLIDATED ~~offsetting~~CONTAINER ~~competitive~~COMPANY ~~price~~LLC ~~and~~AND ~~volume~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~declines over time through continuing cost reductions and effective sales and marketing;~~

•NOTES ~~improving~~TO ~~relationships~~CONDENSED ~~with~~CONSOLIDATED ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~executing~~STATEMENTS ~~on the demands of our customers; and~~

•(Unaudited) ~~prudently investing our capital to meet our customer demands and achieve the above goals of realizing cost reductions and exceeding customer expectations.~~

~~Generally speaking, industry practices and many of our agreements with our customers permit us to pass-through substantially all changes in HDPE (and other resin) prices to our customers~~18. WeRESTATEMENT ~~would~~OF ~~note,~~PREVIOUSLY ~~however,~~ISSUED ~~that~~FINANCIAL weSTATEMENTS ~~cannot guarantee that we will always have the ability to pass through such increases, especially if our customers were unable to pass such increased costs on to their end-customers.~~

AsDuring ~~a limited liability company, we do not pay U.S. federal income taxes under~~ the ~~provisions~~course of ~~the~~completing ~~Internal Revenue Code, as respective shares of~~ the ~~applicable~~Company’s ~~income~~second orquarter ~~loss~~2006 ~~based~~review ~~on ownership are included in the tax returns of our owners. We may make tax distributions to our owners to reimburse them for such tax obligations~~process, ifmanagement ~~any,~~identified asaccounting ~~they~~errors ~~arise. Additionally, the amalgamation of two of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries~~ in ~~2004 and~~ the ~~acquisition of STC and Mayfair in 2005, both U.S. domestic corporations, have made it necessary for the~~ Company ~~to calculate deferred tax assets and liabilities pursuant to~~’s ~~SFAS~~historical ~~109~~consolidated ~~for~~ financial ~~reporting~~statements, ~~purposes.~~as described below:

~~Critical~~• ~~Accounting~~The ~~Estimates~~Company had not fulfilled certain obligations to Dean Foods, formerly known as Suiza Foods Corporation, and its affiliates under bottle and resin supply agreements, resulting in an overstatement of net sales of approximately $0.4 and $1.2 million and an understatement in cost of sales of $1.0 and $3.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.

~~The~~• ~~preparation~~After ofa ~~financial~~review ~~statements~~of ~~and~~contracts ~~related~~with ~~disclosures~~other incustomers ~~conformity~~ with ~~accounting~~similar ~~principles~~terms ~~generally~~to ~~accepted in~~ the ~~U.S.~~agreements ~~requires management~~with toDean ~~make~~Foods ~~judgments, assumptions~~ and ~~estimates~~its ~~that~~affiliates, ~~affect~~ the ~~amounts~~Company ~~reported~~identified inaccounting ~~the~~errors ~~consolidated~~related ~~financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 1~~ to ~~the~~certain ~~consolidated~~of ~~financial~~these ~~statements~~agreements inresulting ~~the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, describes the significant accounting policies and methods used~~ in ~~the~~an ~~preparation~~overstatement of ~~the~~net ~~consolidated~~sales ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~$0.1 ~~Estimates~~and ~~are~~$0.3 ~~used~~million for, ~~but not limited to,~~ the ~~accounting~~three ~~for the allowance for doubtful accounts, worker’s compensation~~ and ~~benefit~~nine ~~plan~~months ~~accruals,~~ended ~~goodwill~~September ~~impairment analysis~~30, ~~provisions for closed facilities and related severances~~2005, ~~and other contingencies~~respectively. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

~~Results~~• In assessing the impact of ~~Operations~~the restatement, management determined that there were offsetting errors in the inventory valuation and lower-of-cost market calculations associated with the accounting for rebates and the actual cost of resin. The result of these items was an overstatement of cost of sales of $0.1 and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.

~~Three~~• ~~months~~In ~~ended March 31~~addition, ~~2006,~~the ~~compared~~Company has determined that transactions and amounts due to/from ~~three~~related ~~months~~parties ~~ended~~should ~~March 31,~~have ~~2005~~been separately presented on the consolidated financial statements.

~~Net~~As ~~Sales.~~a ~~Net~~result, ~~sales for~~ the ~~first~~Company ~~quarter~~has ofrestated ~~2006~~the ~~were~~accompanying ~~$223.5~~condensed ~~million,~~consolidated anfinancial ~~increase~~statements offor ~~$18.5~~the ~~million~~three orand ~~9.0%, compared to $205.0 million for the~~nine ~~same~~month ~~period~~periods ofended September 30, 2005. ~~This increase results from the impact of higher average~~

18A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:

~~Table~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Contents~~Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Effects:

resin costs during 2006. Resin prices as evidenced by the published index prices for HDPE resin continued their declines from the end of 2005 and by the end of the first quarter of 2006 had reversed half, or $0.16 per pound, of the increases in the last half of 2005, but still remained higher than the prior year’s quarter. We estimate that sales would have been approximately $204.7 million, a decrease of $0.4 million from the same period during 2005 after adjustment for the change in resin costs. This decline was primarily attributable to the revenue impact of the sale of our Kansas City, Kansas operation; however, offsetting this and the three other 2005 plant sales or closures were the continued commercialization of new business and the three acquisitions in 2005 which resulted in higher total volumes on a year-over-year basis in the first quarter of 2006.


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
	As Previously Reported			Restatement			As Restated			As Previously Reported			Restatement			As Restated
	(Amounts in thousands)									(Amounts in thousands)
Net trade sales	$	207,696		$	(31,391	)	$	176,305		$	627,032		$	(92,384	)	$	534,648
Related party sales		—			30,835			30,835			—			90,882			90,882
Net sales		207,696			(556	)		207,140			627,032			(1,502	)		625,530
Cost of sales		184,737			945			185,682			563,826			2,070			565,896
Gross profit		22,959			(1,501	)		21,458			63,206			(3,572	)		59,634
Operating income		12,821			(1,501	)		11,320			27,225			(3,572	)		23,653
Income (loss) before taxes		(1,228	)		(1,501	)		(2,729	)		(13,720	)		(3,572	)		(17,292	)
Net income (loss)		(1,253	)		(1,501	)		(2,754	)		(13,656	)		(3,572	)		(17,228	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(1,041	)		(1,501	)		(2,542	)		(13,580	)		(3,572	)		(17,152	)

~~Gross~~20 Profit. Gross profit for the first quarter of 2006 was $29.5 million, an increase of $13.2 million or 81.1%, compared to $16.3 million for the same period of 2005. The increase is attributable to several factors, including the aforementioned higher volumes and the favorable resin environment, business interruption insurance proceeds totaling $2.0 million received during the first quarter of 2006 related to the hurricanes in 2005, lower lease expenses during 2006 compared to 2005 totaling $1.0 million, and improved operating trends as a result of capital programs and strategic initiatives.

~~Selling,~~CONSOLIDATED ~~General~~CONTAINER ~~and~~COMPANY ~~Administrative~~LLC ~~Expense.~~AND ~~Selling,~~SUBSIDIARIES general and administrative expense (“SG&A”) includes non-production related costs including salaries, benefits, travel, rent, and other costs for our corporate functions (such as executive management, sales, procurement, finance and accounting, and human resources). For the first quarter of 2006, SG&A was $11.9 million, an increase of $0.7 million or 6.6%, compared to $11.1 million for the same period of 2005. This increase is due to an increase of $1.0 million in the incentive compensation accrual caused by favorable company performance during 2006 compared to 2005. Also accounting for the increase was the 2006 accrual of $0.5 million for the advancement of a portion of the LTIP Bonus Pool-A to participants who remain employed through the time of the advance, which will be paid out no later than the end of the first quarter of 2007. Partially offsetting the increase was lower salary and related expenses during the first quarter of 2006 resulting from our reorganization in the second quarter of 2005.

~~Loss~~NOTES onTO ~~Disposal~~CONDENSED ofCONSOLIDATED ~~Assets.~~FINANCIAL ~~Loss~~STATEMENTS on disposal of assets for the first quarter of 2006 was $0.2 million, compared to $3.4 million for the same period of 2005. The loss in 2005 was primarily due to the sale of our PET bottle production operation which was located on-site at a customer’s Kansas City, Kansas facility. As a result, a $3.2 million charge was recognized for the write-down of the assets at the Kansas City facility to the contractually defined sales price to the new supplier.

~~Interest~~(Unaudited) Expense. Interest expense primarily includes interest as set forth in the terms of our senior credit facility, senior secured discount notes and senior subordinated notes, promissory notes and the amortization of deferred financing fees. Interest expense for the first quarter of 2006 was $14.9 million, an increase of $1.9 million or 14.3%, compared to $13.0 million for the same period of 2005. This increase is primarily due to an approximate two percentage point increase in weighted-average interest rates on floating-rate debt and higher average revolver borrowings.

~~Liquidity~~Condensed ~~and~~Consolidated ~~Capital~~Statements ~~Resources~~of Cash Flows Effects:

Our principal uses of cash are for capital expenditures, working capital, debt service, and acquisitions. Funds for these purposes are generated primarily from operations and borrowings under our senior credit facility.


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
	As Previously Reported			Restatement			As Restated
	(Amounts in thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	(13,656	)	$	(3,572	)	$	(17,228	)
Accounts receivable		(19,279	)		1,769			(17,510	)
Related party receivable		—			(1,769	)		(1,769	)
Inventories		19,220			(1,042	)		18,178
Related party payable		—			6,222			6,222
Accrued liabilities		(10,396	)		(1,608	)		(12,004	)

~~Cash provided by operations in the first three months of 2006 was $5~~19.~~0 million,~~ ~~compared~~BROKERED toRESIN $4.8 million in the same period in 2005. The change was primarily due to an improvement in our operating results, discussed more fully above, and an improvement in accounts receivable in the first quarter of 2006 versus the same period in 2005. Accounts receivable increased during the first quarter of 2005 due to higher sales in March 2005 versus December 2004 and an increase in days sales outstanding, caused by an increase in sales to a large customer with extended terms. Offsetting the improvement was a decrease in accounts payable in the first quarter of 2006 versus an increase in the same period in 2005 caused by the timing of payments and shortened payment terms with two significant vendors.

~~Cash~~The ~~used~~Company brokers resin to certain dairy and other customers for a brokerage commission. The Company accounts for these transactions on a net basis recording the brokering commission in ~~investing~~net ~~activities~~sales in the ~~first~~consolidated ~~three~~financial ~~months~~statements ofas ~~2006~~the ~~was~~Company ~~$9.5~~does ~~million~~not retain inventory risk, ~~compared~~nor is it the primary obligor to ~~$11~~these customers.9 ~~million~~Gross inresin ~~the~~brokered ~~same~~on ~~period~~behalf of ~~2005.~~customers ~~The~~not ~~change~~included in net sales was ~~primarily~~$30.2 ~~due~~and to$24.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $90.5 and $80.39 million ~~net payment~~ for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

1920. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

~~Table~~On October 13, 2006, the Company entered into an amendment and waiver with respect to its senior secured credit facility, the First Amendment. The First Amendment provides the Company with additional flexibility to continue to execute its current acquisition and expansion strategy and consists of ~~Contents~~two primary components in addition to other minor modifications. The amendment permits: (i) additional acquisitions on a going-forward basis in an aggregate amount of up to $65.0 million in consideration (exclusive of assumed debt and seller notes) and (ii) subject to certain conditions, the Company to borrow up to an additional $50.0 million of incremental terms loans under the senior credit facility primarily to finance future acquisitions.

~~acquisition~~In addition, the First Amendment provides a waiver by the lenders of ~~STC~~certain ~~during~~defaults and events of default under the ~~first~~credit ~~quarter~~facility arising from, among other things: (i) the restatement by the Company of its previously issued financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, ~~partially~~2004 ~~offset~~and 2003 (and the fiscal quarters comprising such fiscal years) and for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, (ii) the failure by ~~higher~~the ~~capital~~Company ~~expenditures~~to ~~during~~deliver the ~~first~~financial statements for the quarter ofended June 30, 2006 and for the month ended July 31, 2006 within the time period required by the credit facility, which have now been filed with the SEC and delivered to such lenders, (iii) the Company’s failure to maintain books and records in compliance with the terms of the credit facility and (iv) noncompliance with certain financial covenants for the periods ended September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005.

~~Cash~~On ~~provided~~October 31, by2006, ~~financing~~the ~~activities~~Company inacquired ~~the~~substantially ~~first~~all ~~three~~of ~~months~~the assets of ~~2006~~Quintex ~~was~~Corporation ~~$3.9~~located ~~million,~~in ~~a change of $0.3 million~~Spokane, ~~compared to $4~~Washington.2 ~~million~~On ~~during~~ the same ~~period~~date, inthe ~~2005.~~Company ~~This~~paid ~~was~~cash ~~primarily due to our March 2006 payoff~~ of a $04.76 million, ~~promissory~~net ~~note related to the acquisition~~ of ~~Mayfair,~~cash ~~offset~~received ~~by slightly higher borrowings on the revolver~~ of $0.35 million for such assets.

~~Senior~~21 ~~Credit Facility—Our senior credit facility consists of the following:~~

•CONSOLIDATED aCONTAINER ~~committed~~COMPANY ~~term~~LLC ~~loan~~AND ~~totaling~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~$220.0 million, and~~

•NOTES aTO ~~$45.0~~CONDENSED ~~million~~CONSOLIDATED ~~revolving~~FINANCIAL ~~credit~~STATEMENTS ~~facility.~~

~~At March 31,~~(Unaudited) 2006, we had $8.1 million of funded borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility, and $9.1 million was reserved for outstanding standby letters of credit, leaving $27.8 million available for future borrowings. The outstanding standby letters of credit were reduced to $9.1 million at the end of March 2006 from $12.3 million at the end of December 2005 due to a reduction of collateral required by our worker’s compensation insurance carrier as a result of our improved safety record. The revolving credit facility matures on December 15, 2008. The amortization schedule of the term loan includes quarterly installments of $550,000 that commenced September 30, 2004 and continues through September 2008, with the remaining balance due December 15, 2008.

The ~~senior~~Company ~~credit~~has ~~facility~~previously ~~also~~identified ~~provides~~a ~~for~~lawsuit ~~mandatory~~that ~~repayments~~had been initiated against its customer Warren ~~from~~Unilube ~~the~~(“Warren”) ~~net~~for ~~proceeds~~Warren’s alleged anticipated breach of ~~certain~~contract. ~~asset~~After ~~sales,~~the ~~debt~~Company ~~issuances,~~obtained aan ~~portion~~injunction ofin ~~equity~~March ~~issuances~~2006 requiring Warren to continue purchasing from the Company, athe ~~portion~~parties engaged in settlement negotiations. A mutually agreeable settlement was finalized in October 2006. As part of ~~excess~~that ~~cash~~settlement, ~~flow~~Warren ~~and~~has ~~insurance~~agreed ~~recoveries~~to ~~and~~pay ~~condemnation~~the ~~events~~Company $4.9 Nomillion ~~such~~in ~~payments~~installments ~~were~~through ~~required~~December 10, ~~for~~2007 and continue purchasing from the ~~period~~Company ~~ended~~at ~~March~~a lesser volume until December 31, ~~2006~~2008. Of the settlement amount, $0.7 million will be applied to outstanding receivables and the remaining $4.2 million will be recorded in operating income as the cash is received.

~~Senior~~22 Secured Discount Notes—In May 2004, the Company completed an offering of $207.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of 10 3/4% senior secured discount notes, which generated proceeds of approximately $150.1 million at issuance. As of March 31, 2006, the accreted value of the bonds, upon which interest expense was calculated, was $182.4 million. The senior secured discount notes will mature on June 15, 2009.

~~Senior~~ITEM ~~Subordinated Notes—The senior subordinated notes that were issued on July~~ 2~~, 1999, have an original face value of $185~~.~~0 million~~ ~~and~~MANAGEMENT’S ~~are~~DISCUSSION ~~due~~AND inANALYSIS ~~full~~OF onFINANCIAL ~~July 15,~~CONDITION ~~2009.~~AND ~~The~~RESULTS ~~notes~~OF ~~bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 10 1/8%, payable semiannually in July and January of each year.~~ OPERATIONS

~~The~~Overview senior credit facility, the senior secured discount notes, and/or the senior subordinated notes contain covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to: (i) make certain restricted payments; (ii) incur additional debt or issue preferred equity; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions on our equity interests or repurchase our equity interests; (iv) repurchase subordinated indebtedness; (v) issue stock of subsidiaries; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) create liens on our assets; (viii) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (ix) merge or consolidate with another company; (x) sell, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; (xi) enter sales and leaseback transactions; and (xii) make capital expenditures above specified levels. The senior credit facility has financial maintenance covenants regarding first-lien debt to EBITDA, total secured debt to consolidated EBITDA and interest coverage. Additionally, the senior credit facility contains a maximum capital spending covenant. At March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all covenants under the senior credit facility, the senior secured discount notes and the senior subordinated notes, including those related to the acquisitions that occurred during 2005.

~~Promissory~~We ~~Notes—On~~are ~~February 11~~a leading North American developer, ~~2005~~manufacturer, ~~just~~and ~~prior~~marketer toof ~~the~~rigid ~~Company’s~~plastic containers ~~acquisition~~for many of ~~STC~~the aslargest ~~described~~branded ~~above,~~consumer ~~STC~~products ~~issued~~and ~~four~~beverage ~~promissory~~companies ~~notes~~ in the ~~aggregate~~world. ~~amount~~We ofserve ~~$1.6~~our ~~million~~customers towith ~~its shareholders~~a inwide ~~consideration~~range of ~~the~~manufacturing ~~repurchase~~capabilities ofand anservices ~~aggregate~~through 2a domestic,~~200~~ ~~shares~~nationwide network of ~~common~~55 ~~stock~~strategically oflocated manufacturing ~~STC~~facilities and a research, development and engineering center located in Atlanta, Georgia. ~~The~~In ~~notes~~addition, ~~bear~~we ~~interest~~have atthree ainternational ~~stated~~manufacturing ~~rate~~facilities ofin 2Canada and Mexico.9% We sell containers to the dairy, water, juice ~~per~~& other ~~annum~~beverage, household chemicals & personal care, agricultural & industrial, food and automotive sectors. ~~The~~Our ~~Company’s~~container ~~effective~~product ~~interest~~line ~~rate~~ranges atin ~~the~~size ~~time~~from ~~was~~two-ounce ~~approximately~~to ~~6.3%,~~six-gallon containers and consists of single and multi-layer containers made from a variety of plastic resins, including high density polyethylene (“HDPE”), polycarbonate (“PC”), polypropylene, and polyethylene terephthalate.

20Management believes that the following factors are critical to our success:

~~Table~~• ofoffsetting ~~Contents~~competitive price and volume declines over time through continuing cost reductions and effective sales and marketing;

~~thus,~~• ~~the~~improving ~~Company~~relationships ~~recorded~~with aand ~~discount~~executing on ~~notes payable. The discount is being amortized over~~ the ~~life~~demands of ~~the~~our ~~notes~~customers; ~~using the interest method. All outstanding~~ and ~~unpaid principal and interest are due and payable on January 1, 2008.~~

On• ~~June 29,~~prudently ~~2005,~~investing ~~just~~our ~~prior~~capital to ~~the~~meet ~~Company’s acquisition~~our ofcustomer ~~Mayfair~~demands ~~(accomplished~~and ~~through~~achieve ~~a merger of Mayfair into STC, a wholly owned subsidiary of~~ the ~~Company) as described~~ above, ~~Mayfair~~goals ~~issued two promissory notes, one for $2.0 million and an additional note for $0.7 million, to its shareholder in consideration~~ of ~~the~~realizing ~~repurchase~~cost ofreductions ~~an aggregate 560 shares of common stock of Mayfair. As a result of the acquisition, the promissory notes become the obligation of STC. The $2.0 million note bears interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum~~ and ~~STC~~exceeding iscustomer ~~required to repay principal and interest in two equal installments on July 1, 2006 and July 1, 2007~~expectations. ~~All outstanding principal and interest on the $0.7 million note was repaid on March 15, 2006.~~

~~The~~Generally ~~Company~~speaking, ~~its~~industry ~~officers,~~practices ~~principal~~and ~~shareholders~~many orof ~~affiliates~~our ~~thereof~~agreements ~~have~~with ~~entered~~our ~~and~~customers ~~may,~~permit ~~from~~us ~~time~~ to ~~time,~~pass-through ~~enter~~substantially ~~the~~all ~~market~~changes toin ~~purchase~~HDPE or(and other ~~sell~~resin) prices to our ~~securities~~ customers. We would note, ~~including~~however, ~~our~~that ~~senior~~we ~~secured~~cannot ~~discount~~guarantee ~~notes~~that ~~and/or~~we ~~our~~will ~~senior~~always ~~subordinated~~have ~~notes,~~the inability ~~compliance~~to ~~with~~pass ~~any~~through ~~applicable~~such ~~securities~~increases, ~~laws~~especially ~~and~~if our ~~internal~~customers ~~restrictions~~were ~~and~~unable ~~procedures~~to pass such increased costs on to their end-customers.

~~Management~~As ~~believes~~a ~~cash~~limited liability company, we do not pay United States (“U.S.”) federal income taxes under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, as respective shares of the applicable income or loss based on ~~hand~~ownership atare ~~March 31~~included in the tax returns of our owners. We may make tax distributions to our owners to reimburse them for such tax obligations, ~~2006~~if any, ~~future~~as they ~~funds~~arise. ~~generated~~Additionally, bythe ~~operations~~amalgamation of two of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries in 2004 and the acquisition of STC Plastics, Inc. (“STC”) and ~~borrowings~~One ~~under~~Hoss ~~our~~Shay ~~senior~~Corp., ~~credit~~dba ~~facility~~Mayfair ~~will~~Plastics be(“Mayfair”) in 2005, both U.S. ~~sufficient~~domestic corporations, have made it necessary for the Company to ~~meet~~calculate ~~working~~deferred ~~capital~~tax assets and ~~capital~~liabilities ~~expenditure~~pursuant ~~requirements~~to SFAS 109 for ~~fiscal~~financial ~~year~~reporting ~~2006~~purposes.

WeCritical ~~also~~Accounting ~~have~~Policies contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial condition. The following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2006 (customer-specific commitments arising in the ordinary course of business are not included):

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Cash Obligations	Total		LessThan 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
	(Amounts in thousands)
Long Term Debt (a)	$	611,738	$	3,213	$	216,525	$	392,000	$	—
Interest on Long Term Debt (b)		162,439		38,829		103,239		20,371		—
Operating Leases (c)		92,752		16,498		29,232		22,428		24,594
Pension Obligation (d)		25,013		6,220		10,269		6,287		2,237
Revolving Credit Facility (e)		8,100		8,100		—		—		—
Capital Leases		541		188		258		95		—
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	900,583	$	73,048	$	359,523	$	441,181	$	26,831
	Commitment Expiration per Period
Other Commercial Commitments	Total		LessThan 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
	(Amounts in thousands)
Standby Letters of Credit	$	9,077	$	9,077	$	—	$	—	$	—
Revolving Credit Facility (f)		27,823		27,823		—		—		—
Total Commercial Commitments	$	36,900	$	36,900	$	—	$	—	$	—

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, worker’s compensation and benefit plan accruals, goodwill impairment analysis, provisions for closed facilities and related severances, and other contingencies. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

~~(a)~~23 The amount included in the above schedule for our senior secured discounts notes and the STC promissory note is the amount due at maturity. As of March 31, 2006, the unamortized discount on that debt was $24.7 million, leaving the total book value of long term debt at $587.6 million. A description of significant terms and conditions of our senior credit facility, senior secured discount notes, senior subordinated notes and promissory notes is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

21Results of Operations

~~Table~~The following management’s discussion and analysis of ~~Contents~~financial condition and results of operations gives effect to the restatement discussed in Note 18 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~(b)~~Three ~~Interest~~months onended long term debt includes interest on our fixed- and floating-rate debt as well as fees for unutilized commitments and letters of credit. The interest portion was estimated assuming the weighted average interest rate in effect for floating-rate debt as of March 31September 30, 2006, ~~remained~~compared into ~~effect~~three ~~through~~months ~~the~~ended ~~maturity~~September 30, of2005 ~~the debt.~~

~~(c)~~Net ~~Included~~Sales. inNet ~~operating~~sales ~~leases~~for ~~are~~the ~~non-cancelable~~third ~~lease~~quarter ~~arrangements~~of ~~for~~2006 ~~facilities~~were $215.5 million, ~~machinery~~an ~~and~~increase ~~equipment~~of ~~and~~$8.4 ~~vehicles~~million or 4.0%, ~~Minimum~~compared ~~payments~~to ~~have~~$207.1 ~~not~~million for the same period of 2005. This increase results from the impact of higher average resin costs during 2006. We estimate that sales would have been ~~reduced~~approximately by$191.7 ~~minimum~~million, ~~sublease~~a ~~rentals~~decrease of $015.65 million or 7.5% from the same period during 2005, after adjustment for the change in resin costs. This decline was primarily attributable to lower volumes from some of our larger sole-source customers due to weakened demand from their end customers, lower demand for water in 2006 as a result of the hurricanes ~~future~~in ~~under~~2005, ~~non-cancelable~~and ~~subleases~~declining sales to Warren Unilube (“Warren”) of $1.5 million resulting from the dispute discussed at Item 1 of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Gross Profit. Gross profit for the third quarter of 2006 was $44.8 million, an increase of $23.3 million or 108.8%, compared to $21.5 million for the same period of 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to a gain of $16.1 million dollars on settlement of a contract dispute with Dean Foods Company (d“Dean Foods”) Weas ~~have~~discussed ~~estimated~~at ~~cash~~Note ~~obligations~~12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements and business interruption insurance proceeds totaling $3.6 million received during the third quarter of 2006 related to ~~our~~hurricanes ~~pension~~Rita ~~plan~~and ~~for~~Katrina ~~seven~~in ~~years,~~2005 as itdiscussed isin ~~not~~Note ~~practicable~~17. Excluding these items, gross profit increased $3.6 million or 16.7% in spite of lower sales volumes due to ~~estimate~~a ~~thereafter~~more profitable mix of products sold and the continued improvement in operating trends as a result of capital programs and strategic initiatives.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense. Selling, general and administrative expense (e“SG&A”) ~~The~~includes ~~revolving~~non-production ~~credit~~related costs ~~facility~~including ~~represents~~salaries, ~~the~~benefits, ~~actual~~travel, ~~outstanding~~rent, ~~balance~~and other costs for our corporate functions (such as executive management, sales, procurement, finance and accounting, and human resources). For the third quarter of ~~March~~2006, 31SG&A was $11.8 million, an increase of $2.3 million or 23.6%, compared to $9.6 million for the same period of 2005. This increase is due to higher legal and consulting costs of $1.0 million primarily related to the restatement of our financial statements as discussed in Note 18 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, increased incentive compensation expenses of $0.6 million caused by favorable company performance during 2006 compared to 2005 and $0.5 million of expenses related to the advancement of a portion of the long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) Bonus Pool-A to participants who remain employed through the time of the advance, which will be paid out no later than the end of the first quarter of 2007.

~~(f)~~Loss ~~The~~on ~~revolving~~Disposal ~~credit~~of ~~facility~~Assets ~~represents~~and ~~the~~Impairments. ~~unused~~Loss ~~borrowing~~on ~~commitment~~disposal ~~available~~of toassets usand asimpairments offor ~~March~~the ~~31,~~third quarter of 2006 was $0.9 million, ~~excluding~~compared ~~our~~to $0.2 ~~minimum~~million ~~borrowing~~for ~~increment~~the same period of 2005. The loss in 2006 is primarily due to a $0.14 million loss on the disposal of a production line that was discontinued in 2006.

~~Off~~Interest Expense. Interest expense primarily includes interest as set forth in the terms of our senior credit facility, senior secured discount notes and senior subordinated notes, promissory notes and the amortization of deferred financing fees. Interest expense for the third quarter of 2006 was $15.7 million, an increase of $1.6 million or 11.6%, compared to $14.0 million for the same period of 2005. This increase is primarily due to an increase in weighted-~~Balance~~average ~~Sheet~~interest ~~Arrangements~~rates of approximately 180 basis points on floating-rate debt, higher average revolver borrowings and increased accretion on the senior secured discount notes.

AtNine ~~March~~months ended September 3130, 2006, wecompared ~~did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred~~ to asnine ~~structured~~months ~~finance~~ended ~~or special purpose entities~~September 30, ~~which~~2005 ~~would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.~~

~~Recently~~Net ~~Issued~~Sales. ~~Accounting~~Net ~~Standards~~sales for the first nine months of 2006 were $656.8 million, an increase of $31.3 million or 5.0%, compared to $625.5 million for the same period of 2005. This increase results from the impact of higher average resin costs during 2006 as noted above. We estimate that sales would have been approximately $605.0 million, a decrease of $20.5 million or 3.3% from the same period during 2005, after adjustment for the change

In24 September 2005, the EITF of the FASB issued EITF Issue 04-13, “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty,” which concluded that entities that enter into inventory purchase and sales transactions with the same counterparty, in contemplation of one another, should combine the transactions and treat them as nonmonetary exchanges involving inventory. Nonmonetary exchanges of finished goods for raw material and finished goods for work-in-process in the same line of business should be recorded at fair value. All other inventory-for-inventory exchange transactions within the same line of business do not culminate the earnings process and therefore should be recognized at carrying value. The EITF is effective for new inventory arrangements entered into, or modifications or renewals of existing inventory arrangements occurring, in interim or annual reporting periods beginning after March 15, 2006. The Company will adopt this EITF in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and it does not anticipate that the implementation will have a material impact on its financial statements.

~~Forward~~ in ~~Looking~~resin ~~Statements~~costs. This decline was primarily attributable to lower volumes from some of our larger sole-source customers due to weakened demand from their end customers, the revenue impact of the sale of our Kansas City, Kansas operation during June 2005 and declining sales to Warren of $4.0 million resulting from the dispute discussed at Item 1 of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

~~The~~Gross ~~statements~~Profit. ~~other~~Gross ~~than~~profit ~~statements~~for ofthe ~~historical~~first ~~facts~~nine ~~included~~months inof ~~this~~2006 ~~quarterly~~was ~~report,~~$103.3 ~~including~~million, ~~without~~an ~~limitation~~increase of $43.7 million or 73.3%, ~~statements~~compared ~~regarding~~to $59.6 ~~our~~million ~~future~~for ~~financial~~the ~~position,~~same ~~business~~period ~~strategy,~~of ~~budgets,~~2005. ~~projected costs~~The ~~and~~increase ~~plans~~is ~~and~~primarily ~~objectives~~attributable to a gain of ~~management~~$16.1 ~~for~~million ~~future~~dollars ~~operations,~~on ~~are~~settlement ~~forward-looking~~of ~~statements,~~a contract dispute with Dean Foods as ~~defined~~discussed inat ~~Section 27A~~Note of12 to the ~~Securities~~condensed ~~Act~~consolidated offinancial ~~1933,~~statements asand business ~~amended,~~interruption ~~and~~insurance ~~Section 21E~~proceeds oftotaling $7.6 million received during the ~~Securities~~first ~~Exchange~~nine ~~Act~~months of ~~1934,~~2006 related to hurricanes Rita and Katrina in 2005 as ~~amended~~discussed in Note 17. WeExcluding these items, gross profit increased $20.0 million or 33.5% ~~have~~in ~~based~~spite ~~these~~of ~~forward-looking~~lower ~~statements~~sales onvolumes ~~our~~due ~~current~~to ~~assumptions~~the favorable resin environment, ~~expectations~~lower lease expenses during 2006 compared to 2005 totaling $1.0 million, a more profitable mix of products sold and ~~projections~~the ~~about~~continued ~~future~~improvement ~~events~~of operating trends as a result of capital programs and strategic initiatives.

~~Forward-looking statements~~Selling, ~~may~~General beand ~~indicated~~Administrative byExpense. ~~phrases~~For ~~such~~the asfirst ~~“will,”~~nine ~~“estimates,”~~months ~~“plans,”~~of ~~“strategy~~2006,” SG&A ~~“believes,”~~was ~~“anticipates,”~~$35.3 ~~“expects~~million,” ~~“intends,”~~an ~~“foresees,” “projects,”~~increase ~~“forecasts”~~of $3.1 million or ~~words~~9.5%, compared to $32.2 million for the same period of ~~similar~~2005. ~~meaning~~This orincrease ~~import~~is due to higher incentive compensation expenses of $2.9 Wemillion ~~have~~caused ~~made~~by ~~such~~favorable ~~statements~~company inperformance ~~prior~~during 2006 ~~filings~~compared ~~with~~to 2005, the ~~SEC~~2006 ~~and~~accrual inof ~~this report~~$1.5 ~~Such~~million ~~statements~~related ~~are~~to ~~subject~~the toadvancement ~~certain~~of ~~risks,~~a ~~uncertainties,~~portion orof ~~assumptions~~the LTIP Bonus Pool-A, and ~~therefore,~~ ~~management~~higher ~~can~~legal ~~make~~and noconsulting ~~representations~~costs orof ~~warranties~~$1.0 asmillion primarily related to the ~~accuracy~~restatement orof ~~reasonableness~~our offinancial ~~such~~statements as discussed in Note 18 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. ~~Should~~Partially ~~one~~offsetting orthe ~~more~~increase ofwas ~~these~~lower ~~risks~~salary orand ~~uncertainties~~related ~~materialize,~~expenses orand ~~should~~severances ~~underlying~~during ~~assumptions~~the ~~prove~~first ~~incorrect,~~nine ~~actual~~months ~~results may~~of ~~vary~~2006 ~~materially~~resulting ~~from~~in ~~those~~part ~~set~~from ~~forth~~our reorganization in ~~applicable~~the second ~~forward~~quarter ~~looking~~of ~~statements~~2005.

~~These~~Loss ~~statements~~on ~~may~~Disposal ~~also~~of ~~involve~~Assets ~~risks~~and Impairments. Loss on disposal of assets and impairments for the first nine ~~uncertainties~~months ~~that~~of ~~could~~2006 ~~cause~~was ~~our~~$2.5 ~~actual~~million, ~~results~~compared to $3.1 million for the same period of ~~operations~~2005. orThe ~~financial~~loss ~~condition~~in 2006 is primarily due to ~~materially~~impairment ~~differ~~charges ~~from~~related to temporarily idle assets held at our ~~expectations~~used equipment warehouse. The loss in ~~this,~~2005 ~~including~~is primarily due to a $2.6 million loss on disposal of assets at a customer’s Kansas City, ~~but~~Kansas ~~not~~facility ~~limited~~discussed more fully in Note 16 to: the condensed consolidated financial statements.

•Interest Expense. Interest expense for the ~~costs~~first ~~and~~nine ~~availability~~months of ~~raw~~2006 ~~materials~~was $45.7 million, ~~particularly~~an ~~resins;~~increase of $4.8 million or 11.7%, compared to $40.9 million for the same period of 2005. This increase is primarily due to an increase in weighted average interest rates of approximately 190 basis points on floating-rate debt, higher average revolver borrowings and increased accretion on the senior secured discount notes.

22Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Table~~Our principal uses of ~~Contents~~cash are for capital expenditures, working capital, debt service, and acquisitions. Funds for these purposes are generated primarily from operations and borrowings under our senior credit facility.

•Cash ~~increases~~provided by operating activities in the ~~costs~~first nine months of ~~compliance~~2006 ~~with~~was ~~laws~~$19.9 million, compared to $23.2 million in the same period in 2005. The change was primarily due to extremely low accounts payable levels due to a change in terms and ~~regulations~~payment structures with two significant raw materials vendors, ~~including~~in ~~environmental~~addition ~~laws~~to a greater decline in resin prices in the first nine months of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005, and ~~regulations;~~very low resin purchases in September in anticipation of a further price decline. Partially offsetting this change was an improvement in our operating results, discussed more fully above.

•Cash used in investing activities in the ~~loss~~first nine months of ~~any~~2006 was $34.6 million, compared to $35.5 million in the same period of 2005. ~~our~~The ~~major~~change ~~customers~~was primarily caused by lower capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2006 of $7.2 million in part due to lease buyouts of $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2005, ~~including~~partially offset by lower proceeds from asset disposals during the ~~risk~~first ~~that~~nine ~~our~~months ~~customers~~of ~~will~~2006 ~~purchase~~compared ~~less~~to the same period in 2005 of ~~our~~$7.0 ~~products~~million, ~~than~~primarily weresulting ~~expect~~from ~~under~~the ~~requirements~~sale ~~contracts;~~of assets at four closed/sold facilities during the first nine months of 2005.

•25 ~~unseasonable weather changes, particularly during the spring and summer months;~~

•Cash provided by financing activities in the ~~ability~~first nine months of 2006 was $14.7 million, a change of $9.5 million, compared to ~~compete~~$5.2 ~~effectively~~million ~~regionally~~during ~~and~~the ~~nationally;~~same period in 2005. This was primarily due to increased revolver borrowings during the first nine months of 2006 versus the same period of 2005.

•Senior ~~the~~Credit ~~ability~~Facility—Our tosenior ~~develop~~credit orfacility ~~adapt~~consists toof ~~new~~the ~~technologies;~~following:

• ~~our~~a ~~dependence~~term onloan ~~key~~totaling ~~management;~~$220.0 million, and

• ~~our~~a ~~ability~~$45.0 tomillion ~~obtain~~revolving ~~additional~~credit ~~financing or make payments on our debt;~~facility.

•At September 30, 2006, events of default existed under the terms of our ~~high~~senior ~~degree~~credit facility, due in part to (a) provisions requiring us to maintain our financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and (b) noncompliance in two quarters of ~~leverage~~2005 with financial covenants based on the restatements of our financial statements as discussed in Note 18 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Subsequently on October 13, 2006, the Company obtained a waiver of the events of default in the First Amendment and ~~substantial~~Waiver ~~indebtedness;~~to Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”), which is discussed at Note 20 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

•At ~~regulatory~~September 30, ~~developments~~2006, ~~industry~~we ~~conditions~~had $21.0 million of funded borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility, and ~~market~~$8.6 million ~~conditions;~~was reserved for outstanding standby letters of credit, leaving $15.4 million available for future borrowings. However, due to the events of default discussed above, the Company was unable to utilize the available borrowings under the revolver from the date we gave notice of the events of default to the administrative agent until the First Amendment was obtained. The amortization schedule of the term loan includes quarterly installments of $550,000 that commenced September 30, 2004 and continues through September 2008, with the remaining balance due December 15, 2008.

•The ~~general~~senior ~~economic~~credit facility ~~conditions~~also provides for mandatory repayments from the net proceeds of certain asset sales, debt issuances, a portion of equity issuances, a portion of excess cash flow and certain property insurance recoveries and condemnation events. No such payments were required for the period ended September 30, 2006.

~~For~~Senior ~~further~~Secured ~~discussion~~Discount ~~of the~~Notes—In ~~factors~~May ~~noted~~2004, ~~above~~the Company ~~and~~completed ~~other~~an ~~relevant~~offering ~~factors,~~of ~~please~~$207.0 ~~see~~million ~~the~~aggregate ~~information~~principal ~~set~~amount ~~forth~~at ~~under~~maturity ~~the~~of ~~caption~~10 3/4% ~~“Risk~~senior ~~Factors”~~secured discount innotes, ~~Item 1A~~which generated proceeds of ~~our~~approximately ~~Annual~~$150.1 ~~Report~~million onat ~~Form~~issuance. ~~10-K~~As ~~for~~of September 30, 2006, the ~~fiscal~~accreted ~~year~~value ~~ended~~of ~~December 31,~~the ~~2005~~notes, upon which ~~are~~interest expense was calculated, was $192.2 million. The senior secured discount notes ~~incorporated~~will ~~herein~~mature byon ~~this~~June 15, ~~reference~~2009.

~~Any~~Senior ~~forward-looking~~Subordinated ~~statements~~Notes—The ~~made~~senior ~~herein~~subordinated ~~speak~~notes ~~only~~that aswere ofissued ~~the~~on July 2, ~~date~~1999, ~~hereof.~~have Wean ~~expressly~~original ~~disclaim any~~face ~~obligation~~value orof ~~undertaking~~$185.0 tomillion ~~release~~and ~~publicly~~are ~~any~~due ~~updates~~in orfull ~~revisions~~on ~~to any such statements~~July 15, to2009. ~~reflect~~The ~~any~~notes ~~change~~bear ininterest ~~our~~at ~~expectations~~a ~~with~~fixed ~~regard~~interest ~~thereto~~rate orof ~~any change in events~~10 1/8%, ~~conditions,~~payable orsemiannually ~~circumstances~~in onJuly ~~which~~and ~~any~~January ~~such~~of ~~statement~~each ~~is based~~year.

~~ITEM~~The 3senior credit facility, the senior secured discount notes, and the senior subordinated notes contain covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to: (i) make certain restricted payments; (ii) incur additional debt or issue preferred equity; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions on our equity interests or repurchase our equity interests; (iv) repurchase subordinated indebtedness; (v) issue stock of subsidiaries; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) create liens on our assets; (viii) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (ix) merge or consolidate with another company; (x) sell, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; (xi) enter sales and leaseback transactions; and (xii) make capital expenditures above specified levels. ~~QUANTITATIVE~~The ~~AND~~senior ~~QUALITATIVE~~credit ~~DISCLOSURES~~facility ~~ABOUT~~has ~~MARKET~~financial ~~RISK~~maintenance covenants regarding first-lien debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), total secured debt to consolidated EBITDA and interest coverage. Additionally, the senior credit facility contains a maximum capital expenditures covenant. At September 30, 2006, we were not in compliance with certain covenants under the senior credit facility, including provisions requiring us to maintain our books and records in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the restatement discussed in Note 18 to the condensed consolidated financial statements caused us to not be in compliance with certain financial covenants for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2005. We were,

~~Our~~26 primary exposure to market risk is changing interest rates due to some of our debt bearing a floating-rate of interest. Our policy is to manage interest rate risk by using a combination of fixed- and floating-rate debt. A hypothetical 10.0% increase in interest rates for the three months ended March 31, 2006, would have increased floating-rate interest expense by approximately $0.4 million. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is based on quoted market prices. At March 31, 2006, the estimated fair value of the senior subordinated notes was $162.3 million and the estimated fair value of the senior secured discount notes was $190.4 million.

~~ITEM~~ however, 4in compliance with the financial covenants for the period ended September 30, 2006. ~~CONTROLS~~We ~~AND~~have ~~PROCEDURES~~secured a waiver as of October 13, 2006 for the events of non-compliance as discussed in Note 20 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. At September 30, 2006, we were not in compliance with a covenant under our indentures requiring timely delivery of certain financial information to the holders of our senior secured discount notes and the senior subordinated notes. On September 13, 2006 we received a notice of default from the trustee under our indenture related to the senior subordinated notes. Our failure to comply with the reporting requirements under our indentures does not constitute an “event of default” under our indentures unless we fail to cure such default within sixty days following notice to us of such failure. We cured such events of default as of October 2, 2006 when we delivered the required financial information.

~~Evaluation~~Promissory ofNotes—On ~~disclosure~~February 11, ~~controls~~2005, ~~and~~just ~~procedures.~~prior ~~Our~~to ~~management~~our February 15, ~~including~~2005 aacquisition ~~disclosure~~of ~~committee~~STC, ~~that~~STC ~~includes~~issued ~~the~~four ~~Chief~~promissory ~~Executive~~notes ~~Officer,~~in the ~~Chief~~aggregate ~~Financial~~amount ~~Officer and other members~~ of ~~our~~$1.6 ~~senior~~million ~~management~~to ~~and~~its ~~finance~~shareholders ~~teams,~~in ~~has~~consideration ~~conducted an evaluation~~ of the ~~effectiveness~~repurchase of ~~our~~an ~~disclosure~~aggregate ~~controls~~2,200 ~~and~~shares ~~procedures~~of common asstock of ~~March 31, 2006~~STC. ~~Based~~The onnotes ~~that~~bear ~~evaluation,~~interest ~~the~~at ~~disclosure~~a ~~committee~~stated ~~concluded~~rate ~~that as~~ of ~~such~~2.9% per ~~time,~~annum. ~~the~~Our ~~disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and~~ effective ~~in ensuring~~interest ~~that~~rate ~~all~~at ~~information~~the ~~required~~time towas beapproximately ~~disclosed~~6.3%, inand ~~reports~~thus, ~~filed~~we ~~with~~recorded ~~the~~a ~~SEC~~discount ~~has~~on ~~been~~notes ~~properly~~payable. ~~recorded,~~The ~~processed,~~discount ~~summarized~~is ~~and~~being ~~reported~~amortized ~~within~~over the ~~time~~life ~~periods~~of the ~~specified~~notes inusing the ~~SEC’s~~interest ~~rules~~method. ~~and~~All ~~forms,~~outstanding and ~~that~~unpaid ~~such~~principal ~~information has been accumulated~~ and ~~communicated~~interest toare ~~our~~due ~~management, including the Chief Executive Officer~~ and ~~Chief~~payable ~~Financial~~on ~~Officer~~January 1, ~~to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure~~2008.

~~Changes~~On June 29, in2005, ~~internal~~just ~~control~~prior ~~over~~to ~~financial~~our ~~reporting.~~acquisition ~~There~~of ~~have~~Mayfair ~~been~~(accomplished nothrough ~~significant~~a ~~changes~~merger inof ~~our~~Mayfair ~~internal~~into ~~controls~~STC, ~~over~~a ~~financial~~wholly ~~reporting~~owned ~~during~~subsidiary of the ~~first~~Company) ~~quarter~~as ~~for~~described ~~the~~above, ~~period~~Mayfair ~~ended~~issued ~~March~~two 31promissory notes, ~~2006~~one ~~that have~~for ~~materially~~$2.0 ~~affected,~~million orand ~~are~~an additional ~~reasonably~~note ~~likely~~for to$0.7 ~~materially affect~~million, ~~such~~to ~~internal~~its ~~controls.~~shareholder ~~Our~~in ~~management~~consideration ~~continues~~of tothe ~~review~~repurchase ~~our~~of ~~internal~~an ~~controls~~aggregate ~~and~~560 ~~procedures~~shares ~~and~~of ~~the~~common ~~effectiveness~~stock of ~~those controls~~Mayfair. WeAs ~~are~~a ~~continuing~~result of the ~~efforts~~acquisition, wethe ~~began during~~promissory notes become the ~~fourth~~obligation ~~fiscal~~of ~~quarter~~STC. ~~for~~The ~~the~~$2.0 ~~period~~million ~~ended~~note, of ~~December~~which $1.0 million was outstanding at September 3130, ~~2004~~2006, ~~when~~bears weinterest ~~formally~~at ~~initiated~~a ~~the~~rate ~~process~~ of ~~documenting~~6.0% per ~~internal~~annum ~~controls~~and ~~over~~STC ~~financial~~is ~~reporting~~required into anrepay ~~effort~~the toremaining beprincipal inand ~~compliance~~interest ~~with~~on ~~the~~July 1, ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~2007. ~~Act~~All ofoutstanding ~~2002~~principal ~~Rule~~and interest on the ~~404~~$0.7 bymillion ~~December~~note was repaid on March 3115, ~~2007~~2006.

23Consolidated Container Holdings (“Holdings”), the Company, and Consolidated Container Company LP (“LP”) (collectively, “CCC”), and Dean Foods entered into a Settlement Agreement dated August 22, 2006, as amended on August 25, 2006 (the “Settlement Agreement”) regarding possible breaches under bottle and resin supply agreements with Dean Foods and its affiliates. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, which was recorded as a promissory note in long term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, CCC agreed to pay $10.0 million, inclusive of interest, to Dean Foods in accordance with the following schedule: $4.0 million on a date to be determined prior to December 31, 2006; $3.0 million on or before August 22, 2007; and $3.0 million on or before August 22, 2008. The Settlement Agreement has no stated rate of interest, thus we recorded a discount on the note payable using our effective interest rate at the time of approximately 9.3%. The discount is being amortized over the life of the note using the interest method. At September 30, 2006, the accreted value of the note was $9.2 million.

~~Table~~The ofCompany, ~~Contents~~its officers, principal shareholders or affiliates thereof has entered and may, from time to time, enter the market to purchase or sell our securities, including our senior secured discount notes and/or our senior subordinated notes, in compliance with any applicable securities laws and our internal restrictions and procedures.

~~PART~~Management IIbelieves cash on hand at September 30, 2006, future funds generated by operations, and borrowings under our senior credit facility will be sufficient to meet working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007.

~~OTHER~~27 ~~INFORMATION~~

~~ITEM~~We 1also have contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial condition. The ~~LEGAL~~following ~~PROCEEDINGS~~tables identify material obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2006 (customer-specific commitments arising in the ordinary course of business are not included):

Environmental Matters. We are a party to a number of environmental legal proceedings. The circumstances surrounding these proceedings are discussed under the heading “Environmental, Health and Safety Matters” in Item 1 of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Since the filing of our Annual Report, there have been developments in two of the environmental matters described in such report.


	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
	(Amounts in thousands)
Contractual Cash Obligations
Long Term Debt (a)	$	619,626	$	10,213	$	609,413	$	—	$	—
Interest on Long Term Debt (b)		154,248		43,136		111,112		—		—
Operating Leases (c)		85,359		16,191		27,967		20,617		20,584
Pension Obligation (d)		21,513		5,580		9,525		5,264		1,144
Revolving Credit Facility (e)		21,000		21,000		—		—		—
Capital Leases		441		166		237		38		—

Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	902,187	$	96,286	$	758,254	$	25,919	$	21,728


	Commitment Expiration per Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
	(Amounts in thousands)
Other Commercial Commitments
Standby Letters of Credit	$	8,622	$	8,622	$	—	$	—	$	—
Revolving Credit Facility (f)		15,378		15,378		—		—		—

Total Commercial Commitments	$	24,000	$	24,000	$	—	$	—	$	—

~~On or about July 22, 2005, we received~~ (a) deThe ~~minimis~~amount ~~settlement~~included ~~agreement~~in ~~proposal from~~ the ~~Environmental~~above ~~Protection~~schedule ~~Agency~~for ~~(“EPA”), offering to resolve~~ our ~~alleged~~senior ~~liability~~secured ~~for~~discounts ~~the Spectron Superfund Site~~notes, ~~Elkton,~~the ~~Maryland~~STC ~~(“Spectron~~promissory ~~Site”)~~note ~~for~~and ~~payment~~the ofSettlement ~~$5,955.~~Agreement ~~The~~liability ~~EPA’s~~is ~~settlement~~the ~~proposal~~amount ~~was~~due ~~addressed~~at ~~to “RXI Plastics, Inc~~maturity. ~~(Continental~~As ~~Plastics)” in care~~ of ~~“Consolidated~~September ~~Container Company.” On August 18~~30, ~~2005~~2006, ~~without admitting any liability for Continental Plastics, RXI Plastics or~~ the ~~Spectron~~unamortized ~~Site,~~discount ~~and~~on ~~despite our belief~~ that wedebt ~~are~~was ~~not~~$15.7 ~~responsible for this site~~million, ~~we notified~~leaving the ~~EPA~~total book value of ~~our~~long ~~agreement~~term todebt, ~~enter~~including ~~into~~capital ~~this~~lease deobligations, ~~minimis~~at ~~settlement~~$604.4 Wemillion. ~~received~~A ~~notification~~description ~~from~~of ~~the~~significant ~~EPA~~terms ~~confirming~~and ~~the~~conditions ~~entry~~ of aour ~~Consent~~senior ~~Decree~~credit ~~effecting~~facility, ~~the~~senior ~~settlement,~~secured ~~and~~discount ~~pursuant~~notes, tosenior ~~the~~subordinated ~~Consent~~notes ~~Decree,~~and inpromissory ~~fulfillment~~notes ofis ~~the settlement,~~included wein ~~will~~our ~~have~~Annual ~~paid~~Report toon ~~the~~Form ~~EPA~~10-K/A ~~and~~for the ~~PRP~~fiscal ~~group~~year aended ~~collective~~December ~~amount of $5~~31,~~955~~ by2005 ~~April 17,~~and ~~2006.~~in WeNote ~~believe~~10 ~~that~~to the ~~Consent~~condensed ~~Decree~~consolidated ~~and~~financial ~~its~~statements ~~settlement~~included ~~payment~~in ~~will~~this ~~eliminate~~Quarterly ~~any~~Report ~~further~~on ~~legal~~Form or10-Q ~~financial~~for ~~liability~~any wedebt ~~may~~acquired ~~have~~since ~~with respect~~December to31, ~~this site~~2005.

In(b) ~~Item 1~~Interest ofon ~~Part~~long-term Idebt ofincludes ~~our~~interest ~~Annual Report~~ on ~~Form~~our 10fixed-K, weand ~~identified several asbestos~~floating-~~related~~rate ~~cases~~debt inas ~~which~~well ~~we were~~as ~~attempting~~fees tofor ~~obtain~~unutilized ~~dismissals~~commitments ~~because~~and weletters ~~had~~of ~~been~~credit. ~~improperly~~The ~~made~~interest aportion ~~party~~was toestimated assuming the ~~lawsuits.~~weighted ~~Since~~average ~~the~~interest ~~filing~~rate ofin ~~the~~effect ~~Form~~for 10floating-K,rate wedebt ~~obtained~~as aof ~~dismissal~~September in30, ~~the~~2006 ~~Powell~~remained v.in ~~American~~effect ~~Standard,~~through ~~Inc.,~~the etmaturity alof ~~lawsuit.~~the debt.

~~Other~~(c) ~~Matters.~~Included ~~We are a party to various litigation matters arising~~ in ~~the~~operating ~~ordinary~~leases ~~course~~are ofnon-cancelable ~~our~~lease ~~business.~~arrangements Wefor ~~cannot~~facilities, ~~estimate~~machinery ~~with~~and ~~certainty~~equipment ~~the ultimate legal~~ and ~~financial~~vehicles. ~~liability~~Minimum ~~with~~payments ~~respect~~have tonot ~~those~~been ~~litigation~~reduced ~~matters~~by ~~but~~minimum ~~believe,~~sublease ~~based~~rentals ~~on our examination~~ of ~~these~~$0.3 ~~matters,~~million ~~experience~~due toin ~~date,~~the ~~and~~future ~~discussions~~under ~~with~~non-cancelable ~~counsel, that any ultimate liability will not be material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows~~subleases.

On(d) ~~May 18,~~We ~~2005,~~have weestimated ~~initiated~~cash ~~suit~~obligations inrelated ~~the~~to ~~United~~our ~~States~~pension ~~District~~plan ~~Court~~ for ~~the~~ ~~Western~~seven ~~District of Tennessee against customer Warren Unilube for Warren’s anticipated breach of contract. In the suit~~years, weas ~~contended~~it ~~that a contract they entered into with former customer Coastal Unilube was assigned to Warren Unilube by Coastal and that Warren~~ is ~~therefore~~not ~~bound~~practicable ~~by the contract until at least December 31, 2007. Warren, however, had indicated~~ to usestimate ~~that it intended to stop purchasing from us before the December 2007 date~~thereafter. In March 2006 we obtained an injunction against Warren, requiring them to continue purchasing from us according to the contract until a trial on the matter. Warren represents the significant share of the sales volume at our West Memphis facility, with the facility totaling $14.7 million in sales in 2005. Sales to Warren were also recognized out of our Memphis facility in 2005.

~~ITEM~~(e) 6.The ~~EXHIBITS~~revolving credit facility represents the actual outstanding balance as of September 30, 2006.

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits
3.1		Form of Joinder Agreement to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Consolidated Container Holdings LLC.
31.1		Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Statement of Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(f)	The revolving credit facility represents the unused borrowing commitment available to us as of September 30, 2006, excluding our minimum borrowing increment of $0.1 million.

24Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

~~Table~~At September 30, 2006, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of ~~Contents~~facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

~~SIGNATURE~~28

~~Pursuant~~Recently toIssued ~~the~~Accounting ~~requirements~~Standards ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~

May 3, 2006	CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC (Registrant)
	By:	/s/ JEFFREY M. GREENE
		Jeffrey M. Greene President, Chief Executive Officer, and Manager
	By:	/s/ RICHARD P. SEHRING
		Richard P. Sehring Chief Financial Officer

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires an employer that sponsors one or more single-employer defined benefit plans to (a) recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a benefit plan in its statement of financial position, (b) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”, or SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”, (c) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end, and (d) disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. SFAS 158 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, with early adoption encouraged. The Company is in the process of evaluating SFAS 158.

25In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS 157 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating SFAS 157.

~~Table~~In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of ~~Contents~~Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. SAB 108 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, with early application encouraged. The Company is in the process of evaluating SAB 108.

~~EXHIBIT~~On ~~INDEX~~July 13, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and Related Implementation Issues” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a Company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 will be effective as of the beginning of fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of implementing this new standard.

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Form of Joinder Agreement to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Consolidated Container Holdings LLC.
31.1		Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Statement of Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Forward Looking Statements

26The statements other than statements of historical facts included in this quarterly report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements, as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current assumptions, expectations and projections about future events.

Forward-looking statements may be indicated by phrases such as “will,” “estimates,” “plans,” “strategy,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “foresees,” “projects,” “forecasts” or words of similar meaning or import. We have made such statements in prior filings with the SEC and in this report. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, or assumptions, and therefore, management can make no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or reasonableness of such statements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those set forth in applicable forward looking statements.

These statements may also involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results of operations or financial condition to materially differ from our expectations in this, including, but not limited to:

•

the costs and availability of raw materials, particularly resins;

•

increases in the costs of compliance with laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations;

•

the loss of any of our major customers, including the risk that our customers will purchase less of our products than we expect under requirements contracts;

•

unseasonable weather changes, particularly during the spring and summer months;

•

the ability to compete effectively regionally and nationally;

•

the ability to develop or adapt to new technologies;

•

our dependence on key management;

•

our ability to obtain additional financing or make payments on our debt;

•

our high degree of leverage and substantial indebtedness;

•

regulatory developments, industry conditions and market conditions; and

•

general economic conditions.

For further discussion of the factors noted above and other relevant factors, please see the information set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

Any forward-looking statements made herein speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such statements, to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our primary exposure to market risk is changing interest rates due to some of our debt bearing a floating-rate of interest. Our policy is to manage interest rate risk by using a combination of fixed- and floating-rate debt. A hypothetical 10.0% increase in interest rates for the three months ended September 30, 2006, would have increased floating-rate interest expense by approximately $0.5 million. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is based on quoted market prices. At September 30, 2006, the estimated fair value of the term loans, the senior secured discount notes and the senior subordinated notes was $215.1, $198.7, and $176.7 million, respectively.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported

within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, our disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of such disclosure controls and procedures are met.

Our management, including a disclosure committee that includes our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other members of our senior management and finance teams, as of the end of the period covered by this report, concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms based on the identification of material weaknesses, as described below in our “changes in internal control over financial reporting”. To address the material weakness described below, management performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures designed to ensure that the consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During fiscal 2006, management identified accounting errors in its consolidated financial statements relating to the accounting for customer contracts as well as errors in inventory valuation as it relates to rebates and the accounting for the actual cost of resin. Because of these accounting errors we restated our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the three and six months ended June 30 , 2005 in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30 , 2006 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, The restatement is further discussed in Note 18 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2, An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements, provides that a restatement of previously issued financial statements is a strong indicator of the existence of a “material weakness” in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting. Based upon that standard, management concluded that the control deficiencies surrounding management’s oversight of the accounting for contracts and inventory valuation represented material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

As a part of its planned remedial measures related to the accounting for contracts, our management initiated a formal review to reassess the accounting for all existing customer contracts with annual revenues of at least $5.0 million. This process is being undertaken by key members of our management with the goal of verifying and of training its accounting personnel regarding the proper accounting treatment and disclosure with regard to such contracts. In addition, by December 31, 2006, we plan to fully remediate this material weakness by implementing additional review and validation procedures over contract review and revenue recognition. The remedial measures will include adoption of formal procedures whereby all contracts are independently reviewed by a Contract Review Committee comprised of key members of our management and finance teams for identification of any complex accounting issues and adoption of a process performed by the Contract Review Committee to formally validate and approve the preliminary conclusions reached by our accounting staff regarding the proper treatment of these issues.

To remediate the material weakness related to inventory valuation, management will implement a secondary detail review process performed by qualified internal or external resources that will assess the assumptions used, calculations performed and accounting guidance available related to this area and other areas determined by management to be critical and especially complex. A written report summarizing the steps performed and conclusions reached regarding each process will then be presented to the Company’s closing committee, which is made up of senior members of the accounting management team, for their approval of the conclusions reached.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect future misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

There have been no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our management continues to review our internal controls and procedures and the effectiveness of those controls. We are continuing the efforts we began during the fourth fiscal quarter for the period ended December 31, 2004 when the Company formally initiated the process of documenting internal controls over financial reporting in an effort to be in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Rule 404 by December 31, 2007.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Environmental Matters. We are a party to a number of environmental legal proceedings. The circumstances surrounding these proceedings are discussed under the heading “Environmental, Health and Safety Matters” in Item 1 of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005. Since the original filing of our Annual Report, there have been developments in four of the environmental matters described in such report.

On or about July 22, 2005, we received a de minimis settlement agreement proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), offering to resolve our alleged liability for the Spectron Superfund Site, Elkton, Maryland (“Spectron Site”) for payment of $5,955. The EPA’s settlement proposal was addressed to “RXI Plastics, Inc. (Continental Plastics)” in care of “Consolidated Container Company.” On August 18, 2005, without admitting any liability for Continental Plastics, RXI Plastics or the Spectron Site, and despite our belief that we are not responsible for this site, we notified the EPA of our agreement to enter into this de minimis settlement. We received notification from the EPA confirming the entry of a Consent Decree effecting the settlement, and pursuant to the Consent Decree, in fulfillment of the settlement, on April 14, 2006, we paid to the EPA and the PRP group a collective amount of $5,955. We believe that the Consent Decree and its settlement payment will eliminate any further legal or financial liability we may have with respect to this site.

In Item 1 of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, we identified several asbestos-related cases in which we were attempting to obtain dismissals because we had been improperly made a party to the lawsuits. Since the original filing of the Form 10-K, we obtained a dismissal in the Powell v. American Standard, Inc., et al. lawsuit, the Hutchinson v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, et al. lawsuit, and the Holmes v. Allied Manufacturing Company, et al. lawsuit.

Other Matters. We are a party to various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. We cannot estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to those litigation matters but believe, based on our examination of these matters, experience to date, and discussions with counsel, that any ultimate liability will not be material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On May 18, 2005, we initiated suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee against our customer Warren for Warren’s alleged anticipated breach of contract. In the suit, we contended that a contract we entered into with former customer Coastal Unilube was assigned to Warren by Coastal and that Warren was therefore bound by the contract until at least December 31, 2007. Warren, however, had indicated to us that it intended to stop purchasing from us before the December 2007 date. In March 2006 we obtained an injunction against Warren, requiring them to continue purchasing from us according to the contract until a trial on the matter. The parties then engaged in settlement discussions, and a mutually agreeable settlement was finalized in October 2006. As part of that settlement, Warren has agreed to pay us $4.9 million dollars in installments through December 10, 2007 and continue purchasing from us at a lesser volume until December 31, 2008.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors have been updated from their original presentation in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 for changes since the filing of that report.

We have substantial leverage, which may affect our ability to use funds for other purposes.

We have a substantial amount of outstanding indebtedness. A substantial portion of our cash flow will be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, which will reduce funds available to us for other purposes, including capital expenditures. We also carry a higher degree of leverage than some of our competitors, which could place us at a disadvantage to some of our competitors in certain circumstances. If we were to experience poor financial and operational results, the combination of the poor performance and our substantial leverage might create difficulties in complying with the covenants contained in our senior credit facility and indentures. The failure to comply with such covenants in our indentures could result in an event of default under those agreements, thereby permitting an acceleration of such indebtedness as well as indebtedness under other instruments that contain cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions. As of December 31, 2005, events of default existed under our senior credit facility due to our failure to comply with certain covenants contained therein, as described in Notes 18 and 19 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. On October 13, 2006, we secured a wavier for the events of default.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to fulfill our obligations.

Our substantial level of indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our senior subordinated notes and our senior secured discount notes, which we refer to together as the notes, and our other indebtedness. Due to the existence of certain events of default under our senior credit agreements as of December 31, 2005, we were not able to borrow additional funds under the revolver. On October 13, 2006, we secured a wavier for the events of default and therefore, we may borrow additional debt under our senior credit facility, increasing the risks discussed below. Our substantial leverage could have significant consequences including:

•

making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes;

•

increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

•

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;

•

requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, which will reduce the amount of our cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

•

requiring us to sell debt securities or to sell some of our core assets, possibly on unfavorable terms;

•

restricting us from making strategic acquisitions, introducing new products or exploiting business opportunities;

•

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry; and

•

placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt.

Restrictive covenants in our notes and our other indebtedness could adversely affect our business by limiting our operating and strategic flexibility.

The indentures governing our outstanding indebtedness and our senior credit facility contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to:

•

make certain restricted payments;

•

incur additional debt or issue preferred equity;

•

pay dividends or make distributions on our equity interests or repurchase our equity interests;

•

repurchase subordinated indebtedness;

•

issue stock of subsidiaries;

•

make certain investments;

•

create liens on our assets to secure debt;

•

enter into certain transactions with affiliates;

•

merge or consolidate with another company;

•

sell, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;

•

enter sale and leaseback transactions; and

•

make capital expenditures above specified levels.

These covenants could have an adverse effect on our business by limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition and other corporate opportunities. In addition, our other indebtedness and our senior credit facility contain other and more restrictive covenants that prohibit us from prepaying our other indebtedness, including the notes. Our senior credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios. Our ability to meet those financial ratios can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those ratios. A breach of any of these covenants, ratios or restrictions could result in an event of default under our senior credit facility and any of our other indebtedness that may be cross-defaulted to such indebtedness, including the notes. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our senior credit facility or such other indebtedness, the lenders or holders of such indebtedness could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under such indebtedness, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If these lenders accelerate the payment of that indebtedness, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness and any other debt, including the notes. As of December 31, 2005, events of default existed under our senior credit facility due to our failure to comply with certain covenants contained therein, as described in Notes 18 and 19 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. On October 13, 2006, we secured a wavier for the events of default.

Any forward-looking statements made or incorporated by reference herein speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such statements, to reflect any change in its expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

The restatement of our financial statements, discussed in Note 18 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, has caused events of default under our senior credit facility, due in part to (a) provisions requiring us to maintain our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and (b) noncompliance in two quarters of 2005 with financial covenants based on the restatement of our financial statements. We secured a waiver for these events of non-compliance as of October 13, 2006, as discussed in Note 20 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Effective November 6, 2006, Ronald H. Klein, an appointee of Franklin Plastics, Inc., resigned from the Management Committee of Holdings. On the same date, Franklin Plastics, Inc. appointed Edward F. Fugger, Jr. to the Management Committee.

Mr. Fugger has served as Vice President, Corporate Development of Dean Foods since February 2004. Prior to joining Dean Foods, Mr. Fugger served as a Managing Director at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. Mr. Fugger joined Bear Stearns’ Investment Banking Division in 1996 and held various positions of increasing responsibility while working across industries on mergers and acquisitions and debt and equity offerings. Mr. Fugger received a B.B.A. in Accounting from Texas A&M University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

In the fourth quarter of this year, the compensation committee of Holding’s management committee approved an allocation of the final 3% of Bonus Pool-A of the Long-Term Incentive Plan to those Bonus Pool-A participants who are currently employed with the Company. This 3% became available for allocation as a result of awards partially forfeited by former employees of the Company upon their termination of employment.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits

10.1		Settlement Agreement among Consolidated Container Holdings LLC, Consolidated Container Company LP and Dean Foods Company dated August 22, 2006.

10.2		Joinder to Settlement Agreement among Consolidated Container Holdings LLC, Consolidated Container Company LLC, Consolidated Container Company LP and Dean Foods Company dated August 25, 2006.

10.3	*	Purchase Agreement by and between Dean Dairy Holdings, LLC and Suiza Dairy Group, LLC, and Consolidated Container Company LP dated August 15, 2006.

10.4		Form of Advance Payment under 2006 Consolidated Container Holdings LLC Long-Term Incentive Plan.

31.1		Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Statement of Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Portions of this exhibit have been redacted subject to a confidential treatment request with the SEC, and have been filed separately with the SEC.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


November 13, 2006	CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY LLC (Registrant)

	By:	/S/ JEFFREY M. GREENE
		Jeffrey M. Greene President, Chief Executive Officer, and Manager

	By:	/S/ RICHARD P. SEHRING
		Richard P. Sehring Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		Settlement Agreement among Consolidated Container Holdings LLC, Consolidated Container Company LP and Dean Foods Company dated August 22, 2006.

10.2		Joinder to Settlement Agreement among Consolidated Container Holdings LLC, Consolidated Container Company LLC, Consolidated Container Company LP and Dean Foods Company dated August 25, 2006.

10.3	*	Purchase Agreement by and between Dean Dairy Holdings, LLC and Suiza Dairy Group, LLC, and Consolidated Container Company LP dated August 15, 2006.

10.4		Form of Advance Payment under 2006 Consolidated Container Holdings LLC Long-Term Incentive Plan.

31.1		Statement of Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Statement of Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Container Company LLC Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Portions of this exhibit have been redacted subject to a confidential treatment request with the SEC, and have been filed separately with the SEC.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER CO LLC