UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 333-118844

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey		22-2884844
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
20 Jackson Drive Cranford, New Jersey		07016
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)
20 Jackson Drive
Cranford, New Jersey		07016
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (908) 276-4000

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, ~~(as~~a ~~defined~~non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ~~Yes ¨ No x~~

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of common shares outstanding at ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2005~~2008 was 3,~~654~~560,~~242~~403.

INDEX

		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007	2
	Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007	3
	Consolidated Statement of Permanent Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended October 31, 2005	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Permanent Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended July 31, 2008	4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1317
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2427
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	27
Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2528
Item 2.	Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	29
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	29
Item 5.	Other Information	25
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	29
Item 6.	Exhibits	25
Item 5.	Other Information	29
	SIGNATURES	26
Item 6.	Exhibits	29
	SIGNATURES	30

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - —UNAUDITED

AS OF ~~October~~ JULY 31, ~~2005~~2008 AND APRIL 30, 2008 ~~2005~~

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per-Share Data)

	October 31,2005			April 30,2005
	July 31,2008			April 30,2008
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	315,~~490~~527		$	215,~~991~~327
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,990 and $6,356, respectively)		106,898			119,815
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,966 and $3,912, respectively)		127,489			132,573
Inventories		6582,~~375~~044			6183,~~760~~318
Other current assets		169,~~192~~011			38,~~840~~092
Total current assets		191,955			188,406
Assets held for sale		900			900
RESTRICTED CASH		256			131
Total current assets		234,971			240,210
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – Net		310,357			320,947
RESTRICTED CASH		204			141
GOODWILL		45,525			47,256
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – Net		288,486			294,218
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS		16,734			16,776
GOODWILL		53,074			53,130
OTHER ASSETS		26,223			26,568
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS		21,876			22,011
TOTAL ASSETS	$	591,050		$	600,084
OTHER ASSETS		12,462			12,518
TOTAL ASSETS	$	611,073		$	622,228
LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND PERMANENT STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	82113,~~023~~429		$	85123,~~068~~366
Current maturities of debt		410,~~541~~729			25,~~621~~977
Income taxes and other taxes payable		43,~~969~~030			23,~~979~~644
Accrued salaries and wages		1512,~~334~~990			14,~~183~~711
Other accrued expenses		1117,~~906~~422			1311,~~981~~016
Total current liabilities		~~118~~157,~~773~~600			~~118~~158,~~832~~714
SENIOR DEBT		76118,~~390~~046			79114,~~097~~035
SUBORDINATED DEBT		~~181~~179,~~561~~794			~~175~~179,~~599~~973
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		78,~~736~~604			58,~~073~~113
PENSION OBLIGATION		2810,~~013~~066			2710,~~980~~113
SWAP OBLIGATION		1416,~~686~~312			2216,~~399~~653
OTHER LIABILITIES		67,~~222~~209			6,~~435~~888
MINORITY INTEREST		87			92
Total liabilities		497,631			494,489
Total liabilities		433,468			435,507
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9)
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 7)
TEMPORARY EQUITY – COMMON STOCK, SUBJECT TO PUT RIGHTS, (574,602)		22,174			22,174
TEMPORARY EQUITY - COMMON STOCK, SUBJECT TO PUT RIGHTS, (668,442 and 866,442 shares, respectively)		30,708			38,418
PERMANENT STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock, $.01 per share stated value; authorized 10,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 6,005,000 shares		60			60
Additional paid-in capital		374			374
Retained earnings		~~195~~153,~~612~~263			~~190~~166,~~330~~588
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(9,046	)		(12,354	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,806			2,778
Treasury stock, 2,350,758 and 2,152,758 shares, respectively at cost		(60,126	)		(52,251	)
Treasury stock, 2,444,597, at cost		(64,235	)		(64,235	)
Total permanent stockholders’ equity		~~126~~91,~~874~~268			~~126~~105,~~159~~565
TOTAL LIABILITIES, TEMPORARY EQUITY AND PERMANENT STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	~~591~~611,~~050~~073		$	~~600~~622,~~084~~228

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 1 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - —UNAUDITED

FOR THE THREE ~~AND SIX~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~OCTOBER~~JULY 31, ~~2005~~2008 AND ~~2004~~2007

(Dollars in Thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	2008			2007
	October 31, 2005			October 31, 2004			October 31, 2005			October 31, 2004
NET SALES	$	255,663		$	255,675
				(As Restated)						(As Restated)
COST OF SALES		236,554			223,354
NET SALES	$	217,898		$	217,065		$	442,341		$	433,124
Gross profit		19,109			32,321
COST OF SALES		193,881			189,034			393,012			376,478
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Gross profit		24,017			28,031			49,329			56,646
Selling, general and administrative		20,893			20,978
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Restructuring and impairments		4,877			111
Selling, general and administrative		19,864			20,636			40,003			41,455
Total operating expenses		25,770			21,089
Restructuring and impairments		417			128			1,249			1,078
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME		(6,661	)		11,232
Total operating expenses		20,281			20,764			41,252			42,533
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:
OPERATING INCOME		3,736			7,267			8,077			14,113
Interest expense		(6,691	)		(6,937	)
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:
Interest income		85			867
Interest expense		(6,613	)		(6,243	)		(12,870	)		(12,403	)
Equity in income of affiliates		331			731
Interest income		52			20			53			41
Other income (expense) – net		436			16
Equity in income of affiliates		434			494			1,012			1,022
Total other expense		(5,839	)		(5,323	)
Other (expense) income – net		(124	)		15			(426	)		290
(LOSS) EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS, BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(12,500	)		5,909
Total other expense		(6,251	)		(5,714	)		(12,231	)		(11,050	)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		825			976
(LOSS) EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS, BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(2,515	)		1,553			(4,154	)		3,063
NET (LOSS) EARNINGS	$	(13,325	)	$	4,933
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE		(1,276	)		356			(1,561	)		1,096
NET (LOSS) EARNINGS	$	(1,239	)	$	1,197		$	(2,593	)	$	1,967

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 2 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - —UNAUDITED

FOR THE ~~SIX~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~OCTOBER~~JULY 31, ~~2005~~2008 AND ~~2004~~2007

(Dollars in Thousands)

	2005			2004
	2008			2007
				(As Restated)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) earnings	$	(213,~~593~~325	)	$	14,~~967~~933
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		178,~~278~~509			168,~~051~~629
Impairment of assets		393			82
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment		(975	)		113
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment		225			168
Loss due to impairment of assets		2,745			—
Equity in income of affiliates		(~~1,012~~331	)		(~~1,022~~731	)
Stock-based compensation expense		165			—
Gain on derivative instruments		(488	)		(87	)
(Gain) loss due to hedge ineffectiveness		(210	)		520
Proceeds from dividends paid by equity investments in affiliates		435			272
Proceeds from dividends paid by equity investments in affiliates		—			424
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		492			(2,131	)
Deferred income tax benefit		(3,261	)		(1,826	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accounts receivable		104,~~408~~998			16,~~085~~515
Increase in inventories		(4,661	)		(3,401	)
Decrease in inventories		1,046			368
(Increase) decrease in other current assets		(~~1,732~~923	)		21,~~410~~936
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(792	)		373
Decrease in other assets		301			1,809
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,162	)		(1,438	)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(7,267	)		6,512
Decrease in other liabilities		(1,984	)		(4,889	)
Increase in other liabilities		528			184
Net cash provided by operating activities		11,062			10,504
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(4,255	)		28,322
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		—			44
Capital expenditures		(5,028	)		(5,133	)
Capital expenditures		(8,870	)		(9,245	)
Acquisition costs		(829	)		(744	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		1,~~084~~141			672
Increase in restricted cash		(~~125~~63	)		(~~125~~188	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(74,~~911~~779	)		(96,~~259~~063	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long-term debt		(2,174	)		(6,380	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		12,500			7,889
Proceeds from long-term debt		—			19,025
Repayments of long-term debt		(3,876	)		(8,996	)
Changes in cash overdraft		519			(10,550	)
Deferred financing costs		(492	)		—
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(1,092	)
Changes in cash overdraft		1,128			(10,295	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,655	)		1,003
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		9,260			(11,402	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(~~997~~26	)		~~(478~~381	)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		~~499~~200			111,~~770~~238
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		215,~~991~~327			211,~~003~~806
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	315,~~490~~527		$	323,~~773~~044
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	121,~~865~~954		$	122,~~876~~071
Income Taxes	$	1,054		$	738
Income Taxes:
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITY:
Paid	$	670		$	47
Note issued in connection with stock repurchase	$	7,875		$	—
Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable	$	1,410		$	1,626

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 3 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PERMANENT STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - UNAUDITED

FOR THE ~~SIX~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~OCTOBER~~JULY 31, ~~2005~~2008

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Total			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)			TreasuryStock			RetainedEarnings			AdditionalPaid InCapital		CommonStock		TotalComprehensiveIncome
BALANCE APRIL 30, 2005	$	126,159		$	(12,354	)	$	(52,251	)	$	190,330		$	374	$	60
BALANCE APRIL 30, 2008	$	105,565		$	2,778		$	(64,235	)	$	166,588		$	374	$	60
Net loss		(213,~~593~~325	)		—			—			(213,~~593~~325	)		—		—	$	(213,~~593~~325	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of taxes of $727)		(1,091	)		(1,091	)		—			—			—		—		(1,091	)
Change in pension obligations		183			183			—			—			—		—		183
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges (net of taxes of $2,933)		4,399			4,399			—			—			—		—		4,399
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(218	)		(218	)		—			—			—		—		(218	)
Acquisition of treasury stock, at cost		—			—			(7,875	)		7,875			—		—		—
Change in fair value of derivative instruments		(937	)		(937	)		—			—			—		—		(937	)
BALANCE OCTOBER 31, 2005	$	126,874		$	(9,046	)	$	(60,126	)	$	195,612		$	374	$	60	$	715
BALANCE JULY 31, 2008	$	91,268		$	1,806		$	(64,235	)	$	153,263		$	374	$	60	$	(14,297	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 4 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

1.	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business and Principles of Consolidation – The Newark Group, Inc., ~~and~~including its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), is an integrated global producer of recycled paperboard and converted paperboard products, with significant manufacturing and converting operations in North America and Europe. The Company’s customers are global manufacturers and converters of paperboard.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, as well as accounting changes considered necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected in these condensed consolidated financial statements. Additionally, the preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect: a) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, b) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements; and, c) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results for the three ~~and six~~-month ~~periods~~period ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending April 30, ~~2006~~2009 due to seasonal and other factors. Accordingly, these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended April 30, ~~2005~~2008 included in ~~our~~the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.

The equity method is used to account for the Company’s investment in the common stock of other companies where the Company maintains ownership between 20 and 50 percent, ~~and~~or has the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee’s operating and financial policies. These investments are included in long-term investments. In the event that management identifies an other than temporary decline in the estimated fair value of an equity method investment to an amount below its carrying value, such investment is written down to its estimated fair value. All significant intercompany profits, transactions and balances have been eliminated.

~~Revenue~~Cash ~~Recognition – Revenue is recognized when the earning process is complete~~ and ~~the~~Cash ~~title~~Equivalents ~~and~~– ~~risks~~Cash and ~~rewards~~cash ofequivalents ~~ownership~~include ~~have transferred~~cash toon ~~the customer~~hand, ~~which~~cash isin ~~determined~~banks ~~based~~and onshort-term ~~shipping~~investments ~~terms.~~with ~~Net~~maturity ~~Sales~~of ~~includes~~three ~~provisions~~months ~~for~~or ~~discounts,~~less ~~returns,~~from ~~allowances,~~date ~~customer~~of ~~rebates~~purchase. ~~and~~Cash ~~other~~overdrafts ~~adjustments that~~ are ~~based~~included ~~upon~~in ~~management’s~~accounts ~~best estimates and historical~~payable ~~experience~~ and are ~~provided~~$13,406 ~~for in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. The Company accounts for shipping~~ and ~~handling~~$12,278 ~~costs~~ as ~~a component~~ of ~~cost~~July 31, of2008 ~~goods sold; amounts for shipping~~ and ~~handling~~April 30, ~~costs~~2008, ~~invoiced to customers are included in determining net sales~~respectively.

~~Stock-based Compensation – In accordance with SFAS No~~2. ~~123~~ ~~“Accounting~~RECENT ~~for~~ACCOUNTING Stock Based Compensation,” the Company accounts for employee stock options and stock appreciation rights based upon the fair value method of accounting for equity instruments which results in the recording of compensation expense in the Company’s financial statements. PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~Cash~~In ~~and~~May ~~Cash~~2008, ~~Equivalents~~the Financial –Accounting ~~Cash~~Standards ~~and~~Board ~~cash~~(the ~~equivalents~~“FASB”) ~~include~~issued ~~cash~~Financial onAccounting ~~hand~~Standard (“FAS”) No. 162, ~~cash~~“The inHierarchy ~~banks~~of ~~and~~Generally ~~short-term~~Accepted ~~investments~~Accounting ~~with~~Principles” ~~maturity~~(“FAS of162”). ~~three~~FAS No. 162 identifies ~~months~~the orsources ~~less~~of ~~from~~accounting ~~date~~principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of ~~purchase.~~financial ~~Cash~~statements ~~overdrafts~~of nongovernmental entities that are ~~included~~presented in ~~accounts~~conformity ~~payable~~with ~~and~~generally ~~are~~accepted ~~$5,108~~accounting ~~and~~principles (“GAAP”) $4in the United States. The current GAAP hierarchy,~~589~~ as set forth in the American Institute of ~~October~~Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 3169, ~~2005~~“The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” has been criticized because (1) it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, (2) it is complex, and ~~April~~(3) 30it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts. The FASB believes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, ~~2005~~the FASB concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB and is issuing this Statement to achieve that result. FAS 162 will become effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, ~~respectively~~“The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The adoption of FAS 162 will have no impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

~~Reclassification~~In –April ~~Certain~~2008, ~~amounts~~the inFASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the ~~prior~~Useful ~~year~~Life ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~Intangible ~~have~~Assets” ~~been~~(“FSP ~~reclassified~~FAS to142-3”). ~~conform~~FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a ~~current~~recognized ~~year~~intangible ~~presentation~~asset under Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS 142”). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142 and the period of expected cash

2.- ~~INVENTORIES~~5 -

Prior to November 1, 2004, the Company used the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method of costing inventory for most of its North American Operations, with the cost of the remaining inventories determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Effective, November 1, 2004, the Company changed its method of accounting for its LIFO inventory to the FIFO method. Management believes the FIFO method is preferable because it provides a better matching of costs to revenues, provides a more meaningful presentation of the Company’s financial position by reflecting recent costs in the balance sheet, and provides a uniform costing method across the Company’s business segments. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the prior

-5-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~period~~ flows ~~consolidated~~used ~~financial~~to ~~statements~~measure ~~presented~~the infair ~~this~~value ~~Form~~of ~~10-Q~~the ~~have~~asset ~~been~~under ~~restated~~FAS to141(R) ~~retroactively~~“Business ~~apply~~Combinations” ~~the~~(“FAS ~~FIFO~~141(R)”) and other applicable accounting ~~method~~literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ~~accounting~~FSP asFAS ~~depicted~~142-3 inwill have no impact on the ~~following~~Company’s ~~table:~~results of operations or financial condition.

	Three Months Ended October 31, 2004							Six Months Ended October 31, 2004
	As Reported		Adjustment			As Restated		As Reported		Adjustment			As Restated
Cost of Sales	$	189,219	$	(185	)	$	189,034	$	377,057	$	(579	)	$	376,478
Earnings from Continuing Operations	$	1,368	$	185		$	1,553	$	2,484	$	579		$	3,063
Net Income	$	1,086	$	111		$	1,197	$	1,619	$	348		$	1,967
Inventories	$	57,315	$	7,759		$	65,074	$	57,315	$	7,759		$	65,074

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, the implementation of FAS 161 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141(revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141(R)”). FAS 141(R) expands the definition of a business combination and requires the fair value of the purchase price of an acquisition, including the issuance of equity securities, to be determined on the acquisition date. FAS 141(R) also requires that all assets, liabilities, contingent considerations, and contingencies of an acquired business be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. FAS 141(R) further requires that acquisition costs generally be expensed as incurred, restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date, and changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period impact income tax expense. FAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 with early adoption prohibited. While application of this standard will not impact the Company’s financial statements for transactions prior to the effective date, its application will have a significant impact on the Company’s accounting for future acquisitions compared to current practice.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“FAS 160”). FAS 160 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests such that minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be required to be reported as a component of equity. FAS 160 also requires that purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control be accounted for as equity transactions and, upon a loss of control, requires the interest sold, as well as any interest retained, to be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 with early adoption prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that FAS 160 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“FAS 159”). FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This provides entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without being required to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 159 effective May 1, 2008 and did not make any fair value elections. Therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of FAS 157 are effective in two phases. On May 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 to its financial assets and financial liabilities. Beginning May 1, 2009, the provisions of FAS 157 will apply to the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities, and the Company is currently evaluating the effects that such adoption may have on its consolidated financial statements (See Note 12).

- 6 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

3.	INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:

	October 31,2005		April 30,2005
	July 31,		April 30,
Raw Materials	$	23,013	$	22,629
	2008		2008
Finished Goods		39,533		35,963
Raw Materials	$	33,103	$	33,078
Other Manufacturing Supplies		2,829		3,168
Finished Goods		45,409		46,478
	$	65,375	$	61,760
Other Manufacturing Supplies		3,532		3,762
	$	82,044	$	83,318

34. ~~LONG-TERM~~ASSETS ~~DEBT~~HELD FOR SALE

	October 31,2005			April 30,2005
Senior Subordinated Notes 9.75% (1)	$	175,000		$	175,000
Three-Year Bank Credit Facility (2)		7,841			9,009
Industrial Revenue Bonds (3)		69,310			70,780
Subordinated Notes (4)		7,748			1,077
All other		2,593			1,451
Total Debt		262,492			257,317
Less Current Portion		(4,541	)		(2,621	)
Long-Term Debt	$	257,951		$	254,696

The Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated August 2, 2006, for the sale of land in Natick, MA where the paperboard mill the Company closed in November 2005 is located. This facility was closed based on the need for rationalization of capacity and the near-term requirement of significant capital investment at the facility which offered little or no return. The closing of the property sale has been delayed by additional due diligence matters, but is expected to be completed within the next twelve months. The net book value of these assets is $900 and is reflected as Assets held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

~~(1) The Company has $175,000 of 9~~5.~~75%~~ ~~unsecured senior subordinated notes. Interest is payable semi~~LONG-~~annually~~TERM ~~(March 15 and September 15) and principal is due, in total, on March 15, 2014. This debt is classified in Subordinated Debt in the consolidated balance sheets.~~DEBT

(2) The Company has a $150,000 senior secured credit facility with ten banks. Borrowing availability is subject to borrowing base requirements established by leverage ratios. In addition, the Company has the ability to issue up to $95,000 for letters of credit, usage of which reduces borrowing availability under the facility. Letters of credit can be issued to enhance industrial revenue bonds, guarantee unpaid claim reserves under insurance policies and/or to provide performance bonds and trade letters of credit. As of October 31, 2005 the Company has $82,761 in letters of credit obligations outstanding ($70,469 of which has been used to enhance security for the industrial revenue bonds), $7,841 in loans outstanding and $59,398 of availability under the facility. The borrowings bear variable interest that is reset quarterly at a rate equal to, at the Company’s discretion, one of the following (1) Prime plus a spread of 1% to 2%, (2) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of 2% to 3% or (3) Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) plus a spread of 2% to 3%. The credit spread on both LIBOR and EURIBOR borrowings is subject to applicable credit spread requirements established by leverage ratios. The rate of interest as of October 31, 2005 is 4.88%. Outstanding letters of credit are subject to a fee equal to the applicable credit spread for LIBOR based loans. The undrawn portion of the facility is subject to a facility fee at an annual rate of 0.50%. This debt is classified in Senior Debt in the consolidated balance sheets.


	July 31, 2008			April 30, 2008
Senior Subordinated Notes 9.75% (1)	$	175,000		$	175,000
Asset-based Credit Facility (2)		39,804			27,329
Term loan (2)		15,000			15,000
Industrial Revenue Bonds (3)		63,495			65,295
Subordinated Notes (4)		5,158			5,335
All other (5)		10,112			12,026

Total Debt		308,569			299,985
Less Current Portion		(10,729	)		(5,977	)

Long-Term Debt	$	297,840		$	294,008

(31) The ~~industrial~~Company ~~revenue~~has ~~bonds~~$175,000 ~~are comprised~~ of: ~~Mercer~~9.75% ~~IRB~~unsecured ofsenior ~~$1,750,~~subordinated ~~Mobile~~notes ~~IRB~~outstanding. ofInterest ~~$4,975,~~is ~~Natick~~payable ~~IRB~~semi-annually of(March ~~$40,~~15 ~~Ohio~~and ~~IRB~~September ~~of $~~15~~,500,~~) and ~~Massachusetts~~principal ~~IRBs~~is ~~of $47~~due,~~045~~ asin ~~of October 31~~total, ~~2005.~~on ~~These~~March ~~bonds~~15, ~~are variable rate demand bonds with maturity dates ranging from July 2006 through July 2031 and where the interest rates range from 2~~2014.~~70%~~ ~~to 6.75% and are reset every seven days.~~ This debt is classified in ~~Senior~~Subordinated Debt in the condensed consolidated balance sheets ~~with a portion in Current Maturities of Debt~~.

(2) On March 9, 2007, the Company entered into a five-year asset-based credit agreement and a six-year credit-linked credit agreement. The credit-linked agreement was amended on August 12, 2008, and during the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company paid $492 in fees related to the amendment which have been deferred at July 31, 2008, and will be amortized over the remaining life of the facility beginning in August 2008. The asset-based facility provides the Company a revolving line of credit in the aggregate principal amount of up to $85,000 (depending on the Company’s borrowing base), up to $25,000 of which may be used for loans directly to the Company’s International subsidiary and up to $15,000 of which may be used for letters of credit, and other financial accommodations. The credit-linked facility provides the Company a $15,000 term loan and a $75,000 credit-linked letter of credit facility, and other financial accommodations. Borrowings under the asset-based facility bear interest at a rate of prime or the Eurodollar rate plus a credit spread determined based on availability under the facility. Prior to the amendment of the credit-linked facility, the term loan under that facility bore interest at a rate of prime plus 1.0% or the Eurodollar rate plus a credit spread of 2.25%. After the amendment, the term loan under the credit-linked facility bears interest at a rate of prime plus 5.5% or the Eurodollar rate plus a credit spread of 6.5%. Letters of Credit are issued under the credit-linked facility primarily to enhance the Company’s multiple Industrial Revenue Bond (“IRB”) issues with the credit spread being the same as the term loan. As of July 31, 2008, the Company had a total of $73,379 in letters of credit obligations outstanding ($64,466 of which had been used to enhance the industrial revenue bonds) and $525 in letters of credit outstanding under the asset-based facility. Separately under the asset-based facility, the Company had $39,804 in borrowings outstanding at rates between 3.97% and 5.97% (including letter of credit spread), and under the credit-linked facility had $15,000 outstanding on the term loan at a rate of 4.72%. The Company had $22,992 of

- 7 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~(4)~~borrowing ~~Pursuant~~availability tounder the ~~July~~asset-based 5,facility ~~2005~~at ~~“put”~~July of31, ~~Company~~2008. ~~common~~The ~~stock~~undrawn toportions ~~the~~of ~~Company by its former Chairman and current Director (see Note 9),~~ the ~~Company~~facilities ~~issued~~are asubject ~~Subordinated note on August 10, 2005 for $7,875~~ to ~~the~~a ~~former~~facility ~~Chairman~~fee inat ~~exchange~~an ~~for~~annual ~~the~~rate ~~198,000 shares~~ of ~~Company common stock owned by him~~0.25% ~~The note bears interest at the prime rate in effect from time~~ to ~~time,~~0.30%. ~~requires~~This ~~quarterly~~debt ~~principal and interest payments and~~ is ~~due~~classified in ~~July~~Senior ~~2015.~~Debt Asin ~~of October 31, 2005,~~ the ~~remaining~~condensed consolidated balance ~~on the note is $6,910~~sheets.

~~Our~~(3) ~~senior~~The ~~secured~~Industrial ~~revolving~~Revenue ~~credit~~Bonds ~~facility~~are ~~requires~~comprised ~~that~~of: weMercer ~~satisfy~~IRB ~~certain~~of ~~financial~~$1,000, ~~covenants~~Mobile IRB of $3,640, asOhio ~~defined~~IRB inof ~~the~~$15,500, ~~credit~~and ~~facility~~Massachusetts ~~agreement~~IRBs of $43,355 as of July 31, 2008. These ~~covenants~~ ~~consist~~bonds are variable rate demand bonds, secured by letters of ancredit, with maturity dates ranging from November 2011 through July 2031 and where the interest ~~coverage~~rates ~~test,~~range afrom ~~$30~~4.73% ~~million~~to ~~maximum~~5.33% ~~level~~(including letter of ~~annual~~credit ~~capital~~spread) ~~expenditures~~ and ~~certain~~are ~~leverage~~reset ~~ratios~~every seven days. AtAll ~~October 31,~~borrowings ~~2005,~~under ~~the~~these ~~Company~~facilities isare classified in ~~compliance~~Senior Debt in the condensed consolidated balance sheets with ~~all~~a ~~financial~~portion ~~covenants.~~in Current maturities of debt.

~~Assets~~(4) ~~pledged~~The asCompany ~~collateral~~issued ~~under~~a subordinated note to a prior stockholder in exchange for the ~~credit~~stockholder’s ~~facility~~shares ~~include~~of ~~substantially all~~common ~~domestic~~stock. ~~machinery~~The note bears interest at the prime rate in effect from time to time, ~~equipment~~requires quarterly principal and ~~receivables~~interest payments and is due in July 2015. As of July 31, as2008, ~~well~~the asremaining ~~certain~~balance ~~real~~on ~~estate~~the note is $4,961. In April 2008, the Company issued an additional subordinated note for $197 in connection with its purchase of 50% of the outstanding shares of Jackson Drive Corp. The debt associated with these notes is classified in Subordinated Debt in the condensed consolidated balance sheets with a portion in Current maturities of debt.

~~The~~(5) ~~Company~~All ~~has~~other ~~cross-currency~~includes ~~interest~~the ~~rate~~following ~~swap~~from ~~agreements~~our ~~with~~International ~~two~~operations: ~~banks.~~$186 ~~These~~of ~~agreements~~discounted ~~have~~bills ~~been~~pending ~~designated~~collection asand ~~cash~~$6,233 ~~flow~~of ~~hedges~~a ~~against~~five ~~the~~year ~~existing~~loan. ~~intercompany~~The borrowings under this five year loan tobear ~~the~~a ~~Company’s~~variable ~~European~~interest ~~subsidiary~~rate of EURIBOR plus . At75%, ~~October~~ or 5.625% as of July 31, ~~2005~~2008. Principal and ~~April 30,~~interest ~~2005~~are due every six months, at which point the ~~fair~~interest ~~value~~rate ofis ~~the~~reset. ~~swaps~~Additional ~~represented~~borrowings aby ~~liability~~our ofinternational ~~$14,686~~operations ~~and~~include an interest-free loan for $22543,~~399,~~ ~~respectively~~which requires equal repayment amounts every six months beginning August 3, ~~the~~2009. ~~decrease~~All ~~resulting~~other ~~from~~also includes a ~~scheduled~~loan ~~principal~~with ~~payment~~Toronto ~~and~~Dominion Bank for $866, which bears interest at the ~~affects~~rate of 5.5% (the ~~change~~prime inrate, ~~foreign~~4.75% ~~currency exchange~~at ~~rates~~July 31, 2008 plus 0.75%), ~~The~~payable ~~Company~~monthly ~~has~~through ~~recognized~~May ~~income~~2015. ofThe ~~$210~~loan ~~and~~is secured by a ~~charge~~mortgage ofon ~~$266~~the ~~within~~Company’s ~~Other~~Richmond, ~~(expense)~~B.C., ~~income~~Canada –facility. ~~net~~This onloan is classified in Senior Debt in the condensed consolidated ~~statements~~balance sheets with a portion in Current maturities of ~~operations,~~debt. ~~related~~All toother ~~hedge~~further ~~ineffectiveness~~includes borrowings by Jackson Drive Corp. for $2,284 ~~during~~which is secured by a mortgage on the ~~six~~Company’s ~~months~~corporate ~~ended~~headquarters. ~~October 31,~~This ~~2005~~ loan matures in July 2024 and ~~2004,~~carries ~~respectively.~~a fixed interest rate of 5.625%.

The asset-based and credit-linked facilities include financial covenants as follows: (a) if, during any quarter, Excess Availability, as defined under the credit facilities, falls below $10,000, the Company must achieve a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined, of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. and (b) the Senior Leverage Ratio, as defined and as amended in the credit-linked facility on August 12, 2008, for each twelve-month period ending as of each of the following fiscal quarter ends shall be less than or equal to 4.75 to 1.0 at July 31, 2008, 4.50 to 1.0 at October 31, 2008, 3.50 to 1.0 at January 31, 2009 and 3.0 to 1.0 at April 30, 2009 and thereafter. At July 31, 2008, the Company is not aware of any instances of non-compliance with financial covenants.

Under the asset-based agreement, the Company (a) granted the lenders a first priority lien on all of its accounts receivable and inventory (the “ABL Priority Collateral”) and a second priority lien on substantially all of its other assets, including certain real property, and (b) guaranteed the obligations, under this facility, of its International subsidiary. Under the credit-linked agreement, the Company granted the lenders a first priority lien on substantially all of its assets, including certain real property (excluding accounts receivable and inventory), and a second priority lien on all ABL Priority Collateral.

The Company is involved in the use of derivative financial instruments, in the form of cross-currency interest rate swaps and various hedging transactions, to manage interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, certain energy price risks and other raw material price risks. The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its derivative financial instruments. The Company anticipates, however, that the counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under the contracts.

4The Company has cross-currency interest rate swap agreements with a member of our bank group. ~~RETIREMENT~~At ~~PLANS~~July 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, the fair value of the swaps represented a liability of $13,163 and $13,070, respectively. During the quarter ended July 31, 2007, the Company entered into another swap agreement in relation to an intercompany loan with its European subsidiary that was not designated as a hedge and represented a liability of $3,149 and $3,583 as of July 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. The Company has recognized gains of $488 and $87 within Other (expense) income – net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations, related to derivative activities, during the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

~~The~~- ~~following~~8 ~~table~~- ~~presents the net periodic pension cost for the Company’s domestic Pension Plans:~~

	Pension Costs Three Months ended						Pension Costs Six Months ended
	October 31,2005			October 31,2004			October 31,2005			October 31,2004
Service Cost	$	998		$	1,156		$	2,160		$	2,099
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation		1,984			1,642			3,538			3,108
Expected Return on Assets (Gain) Loss		(2,481	)		(1,791	)		(4,000	)		(3,038	)
Net Amortization		575			297			917			684
Net Pension Expense	$	1,076		$	1,304		$	2,615		$	2,853

The Company estimates a minimum cash contribution to its domestic pension plans of approximately $7,000 during fiscal year ending April 30, 2006, and has made a contribution of $1,600 towards that total during the six months ended October 31, 2005. As of October 31, 2005, 77% of the plan’s assets were in equity investments, 14% in fixed-income securities and 9% in commercial paper, cash and other.

-7-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

6.	RETIREMENT PLANS

The following table presents the net periodic pension cost for the Company’s domestic Pension Plans:


	Pension Costs Three Months ended
	July 31, 2008			July 31, 2007
Service Cost	$	684		$	820
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation		1,998			1,887
Expected Return on Assets Gain		(2,282	)		(2,383	)
Net Amortization		183			241

Net Pension Expense	$	583		$	565

The Company estimates a cash contribution to its domestic pension plans of approximately $6,000 during fiscal year ending April 30, 2009 and has made a contribution of $550 towards that $6,000 total during the three months ended July 31, 2008. As of July 31, 2008, 52% of the plan’s assets were in equity investments, 40% in fixed-income securities and 8% in cash and other.

The following table presents the net periodic pension cost for the Company’s foreign Pension Plans:

	Pension Costs Three Months ended						Pension Costs Six Months ended
	Pension CostsThree Months ended
	October 31,2005			October 31,2004			October 31,2005			October 31,2004
	July 31,2008			July 31,2007
Service Cost	$	476		$	329		$	95		$	63
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation		5957			2256			~~117~~			71
Expected Return on Assets (Gain) Loss		(5449	)		(5142	)		~~(107~~	)		~~(85~~	)
Net Amortization		—(2	)		12—			—			12
Net Pension Expense	$	5212		$	1523		$	~~105~~		$	61

57. RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENTS

For the Three Months Ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~2004~~2007:

~~2006~~Fiscal 2009 Restructuring

~~Dismantling~~The ~~costs in the~~ Paperboard segment ~~relate~~incurred to$4,877 ~~continued~~of ~~costs~~restructuring toand ~~exit~~impairment ~~two~~charges ~~facilities~~in ~~closed~~the inthree ~~prior~~months ~~periods.~~ended ~~The~~July 31, ~~severance~~2008. ~~costs~~Of ~~and~~this ~~asset~~amount, $2,399 related to non-cash impairment charges ~~for~~associated with the ~~quarter~~shut ~~relate~~downs toof ~~our~~the ~~mill~~Haverhill inand ~~Natick,~~Bennington ~~MA,~~paperboard ~~the~~mills ~~closing~~and of$1,324 ~~which~~related ~~was~~to ~~announced~~severance incosts ~~September~~for ~~2005.~~hourly ~~Upon~~and ~~closure,~~salaried ~~there~~employees ~~will~~at bethese 58locations. ~~severed employees~~Additionally, ~~primarily~~approximately ~~representing~~$865 of the ~~hourly~~total ~~workforce.~~was ~~The~~related ~~decision~~ to ~~close~~ the ~~mill was~~shut-down ~~made~~of ~~based~~a onpaper machine at one of the ~~need~~Company’s ~~for~~California ~~rationalization~~locations ofwith ~~capacity~~$440 ~~and~~related ~~the~~to ~~near-term~~severance ~~requirement~~costs, of$346 ~~significant~~related ~~capital~~to ~~investment~~non-cash atimpairment charges, and the ~~facility~~remaining ~~which~~$79 ~~offered~~related ~~little~~to ordismantling, nomothballing and ~~return~~other costs. The ~~Converted~~remaining ~~Products~~$289 ~~segment~~of ~~incurred~~restructuring ~~additional~~charges ~~exit~~related to costs atto ~~two facilities~~exit ~~closed~~previously inshut ~~prior~~down ~~periods~~facilities.

~~2005~~Non-cash ~~Restructuring~~impairment charges on the assets of the Company’s shut down mills and paper machines are based on estimates made by Company management. Management’s initial estimates are based on expected proceeds realization from the used equipment and/or scrap metal markets at the time of determination, and these estimates may change significantly based on conditions in those markets. The $346 of additional non-cash impairment charges on the paper machine at one of the Company’s California mills is due to deteriorating pricing conditions in the used paper machine market.

~~The~~Fiscal ~~Paperboard~~2008 ~~segment~~Restructuring showed net restructuring credits of $60. Actual expenses incurred of $350 were offset by $410 which was received from the sale of certain water/sewage discharge rights from a facility that was closed in prior years. Severance costs of $62 relate to the facility in Sunrise, FL which closed on July 15, 2004. Asset impairment charges of $32 and the majority of the $256 of actual dismantling charges were incurred at the facility in Stockton, CA.

The ~~Converted~~Paperboard ~~Products~~ segment incurred $~~188~~111 of ~~restructuring~~ charges ~~on three locations – Vancouver, WA, Stockton, CA, and Kountze, TX. Three other restructured locations in this segment incurred no charges~~ for ~~the~~costs ~~period~~to ~~and~~exit ~~are~~previously ~~not~~shut ~~expected~~down ~~to incur future charges~~locations.

~~The~~- ~~components~~9 of- ~~the Company’s plant restructuring and impairments incurred for the three months ended:~~

	Paperboard			ConvertedProducts		Total
October 31, 2005
Severance	$	146		$	—	$	146
Dismantling, Mothballing & Other		101			37		138
Asset Impairment		115			18		133
Total Charges	$	362		$	55	$	417
October 31, 2004
Severance	$	62		$	13	$	75
Dismantling, Mothballing & Other		(154	)		166		12
Asset Impairment		32			9		41
Total Charges	$	(60	)	$	188	$	128

-8-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~For~~The ~~the~~components ~~Six~~of ~~Months~~the ~~Ended~~Company’s ~~October 31,~~plant ~~2005~~restructuring and ~~2004~~impairments incurred for the three months ended:

2006 Restructuring


	Paperboard		Total
July 31, 2008
Severance	$	1,764	$	1,764
Dismantling, Mothballing & Other		368		368
Asset Impairment		2,745		2,745

Total Charges	$	4,877	$	4,877

July 31, 2007
Dismantling, Mothballing & Other	$	111	$	111

Total Charges	$	111	$	111

The Paperboard segment incurred $236 of expenses related to the maintenance of three facilities closed in prior years. The remaining $261 in this segment are comprised of severance costs and asset impairment charges related to the announced closing of our Natick, MA facility. Within the Converted Products segment, the majority of both dismantling and impairment charges relate to a certain leased facility which ceased production operations in April 2004 but continued to be used for warehousing purposes. The $166 within corporate represents the loss on the sale of a previously restructured facility in Greenville, SC. Gross proceeds on the sale were $1,078.

2005 Restructuring

The Paperboard segment incurred severance costs of $76 from a facility in Sunrise, FL which closed on July 15, 2004 due to the fact that it had been operating at a loss for many months. This location also incurred $55 of costs to exit the property. The remaining restructuring charges of $452 were offset by $410 due to the sale of certain water/sewer discharge rights at a facility that was closed in prior years.

The Converted Products segment incurred restructuring charges on six locations – Vancouver, WA, Stockton, CA, Mira Loma, CA, Kountze, TX, Oshkosh, WI and Neenah, WI; restructuring charges are $905. With the exception of the Kountze, TX facility which was closed as a result of poor financial performance, the remaining locations in this segment were closed as a result of consolidation of operations.

The components of the Company’s plant restructuring and impairments incurred for the six months ended:

	Paperboard		ConvertedProducts		Corporate		Total
October 31, 2005
Severance	$	146	$	—	$	—	$	146
Dismantling, Mothballing & Other		236		308		166		710
Asset Impairment		115		278		—		393
Total Charges	$	497	$	586	$	166	$	1,249
October 31, 2004
Severance	$	76	$	137	$	—	$	213
Dismantling, Mothballing & Other		65		724		—		789
Asset Impairment		32		44		—		76
Total Charges	$	173	$	905	$	—	$	1,078

The following table summarizes the Company’s accruals for plant restructuring costs:

	Dismantling,Mothballing & OtherCosts			Severance andPayroll RelatedCosts			~~TotalProvision~~	TotalProvision
April 30, 2005 Accrual Balance	$	46		$	—		$	46
April 30, 2008 Accrual Balance	$	58		$	194			$	252
Restructuring Charges for the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005		710			146			856
Restructuring Charges for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2008		368			1,764				2,132
Amounts Paid Against 2005 Accruals		(46	)		—			(46	)
Amounts Paid Against 2008 Accruals		(58	)		(72	)			(130	)
Amounts Paid Against 2006 Accruals		(670	)		—			(670	)
Amounts Paid Against 2009 Accruals		(163	)		(265	)			(428	)
October 31, 2005 Accrual Balance	$	40		$	146		$	186
July 31, 2008 Accrual Balance	$	205		$	1,621			$	1,826

~~-9-~~The following table summarizes restructuring and impairment costs by segment for restructuring plans initiated since January 1, 2003 and accounted for under FAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”:


	Cumulative Costs as of April 30, 2008 (1)		Costs for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2008 (2)		Estimated Costs to Complete Initiatives as of July 31, 2008		Total Estimated Costs of Initiatives as of July 31, 2008
Paperboard	$	18,069	$	4,867	$	5,000	$	27,936

Converted Products		2,645		—		—		2,645

	$	20,714	$	4,867	$	5,000	$	30,581

(1)	Of the $20,714 in cumulative restructuring costs, $9,388 were non-cash charges related to asset impairment.

(2)	The total costs incurred in the three months ended July 31, 2008, $4,867, does not agree with the three month total charges of $4,877 from a prior table above since some of the costs are related to plans initiated prior to January 1, 2003.

8.	INCOME TAXES

The Company’s consolidated tax rate is computed using an annual effective rate for each taxable jurisdiction. The Company records income tax expense related to its state and foreign jurisdictions in which it has taxable income. During the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has not recorded US federal income tax expense due to the uncertainty of the realization of the net deferred tax assets which is dependent upon generating taxable income in future periods. Accordingly, the Company has a valuation allowance recorded against all of its US net federal deferred tax assets.

9.	COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company and its subsidiaries are party to various claims, legal actions, complaints and administrative proceedings, including workers’ compensation and environmental claims, arising in the ordinary course of business.

- 10 -

~~The~~THE ~~following~~NEWARK ~~table summarizes restructuring and impairment costs by segment for those plans initiated since January 1~~GROUP, ~~2003 and accounted for under Statements of Accounting Standards No~~INC. ~~146,~~ ~~“Accounting~~AND ~~for~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”:~~

	CumulativeCosts as of April 30,2005 (1)		Costs for the SixMonths EndedOctober 31, 2005 (2)		Estimated Costs toCompleteInitiatives as ofOctober 31, 2005		Total EstimatedCosts ofInitiatives as ofOctober 31,2005
Paperboard	$	13,891	$	483	$	1,313	$	15,687
Converted Products		1,531		586		525		2,642
	$	15,422	$	1,069	$	1,838	$	18,329

Although in management’s opinion the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, in the event of one or more adverse determinations related to these issues, the impact on the Company’s results of operations could be material to any specific period.

~~(1)~~Current OfEnvironmental ~~the~~Matters ~~$15,422 in cumulative restructuring costs, $7,089 were non-cash charges related to asset impairment.~~

~~(2)~~ The Company ~~total~~has ~~costs~~identified ~~incurred~~environmental incontamination ~~the~~at ~~six~~three ~~months~~of ~~ended~~its ~~October~~closed ~~31,~~facilities ~~2005~~that may require remediation upon retirement of these assets. However, $1no such liability has been recognized for these facilities,~~069,~~ as the Company currently does not have ~~agree~~sufficient ~~with~~information ~~the~~available ~~six~~to ~~month~~assess ~~total~~if ~~charges~~remediation ofwill $1be required or to reasonably estimate any potential obligation. For these three locations,~~249~~ ~~from~~any apotential ~~prior~~obligation ~~table~~cannot ~~above~~be ~~since~~reasonably ~~some~~estimated ofas the ~~costs~~settlement ~~are~~date ~~related~~or potential tosettlement ~~plans~~dates, ~~initiated~~the ~~prior~~settlement tomethod ~~January~~or 1potential settlement methods, ~~2003~~and other relevant facts to determine a reasonable estimate for the obligation are unknown at this time.

6By letters dated February 14, 2006 and June 2, 2006, the United States Environment Protection Agency (“EPA”) notified the Company of its potential liability relating to the Lower Passaic River Study Area (“LPRSA”), which is part of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site, under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. ~~INCOME~~The ~~TAXES~~Company is one of at least 70 potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) identified thus far. The EPA alleges that hazardous substances were released from the Company’s now-closed Newark, NJ paperboard mill into the Lower Passaic River. The EPA informed the Company that it may be potentially liable for response costs that the government may incur relating to the study of the LPRSA and for unspecified natural resource damages. The EPA demanded that the Company pay $2,830 in unreimbursed past response costs on a joint and several liability basis. Alternatively, the EPA gave the Company the opportunity to obtain a release from these past response costs by joining the Cooperating Parties Group (the “Group”) and agreeing to fund an environmental study by the EPA; the Company subsequently joined the Group. In 2006, the EPA notified the Group that the cost of the study would exceed its initial estimates and offered the Group the opportunity to conduct the study by itself rather than reimburse the government for the additional costs incurred. The Group engaged in discussions with the EPA and the Group agreed to assume responsibility for the study pursuant to an Administrative Order on Consent. Cumulatively, as of July 31, 2008 and based upon the most recent estimates for the study, the Company has expensed $759 (none of which was expensed in the quarter ended July 31, 2008), of which $332 remains accrued.

Additionally, by letter dated August 2, 2007, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) of the United States Department of Commerce sent a letter to the Company and other companies identified as PRPs notifying them that it intended to perform an assessment of injuries to natural resources in connection with the release of hazardous substances at or from the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site. In ~~determining~~this letter, the NOAA invited all of the identified PRPs, including the Company’s, ~~consolidated~~to ~~tax~~participate ~~rate~~in the development and performance of this assessment. The Group, ancollectively, ~~annual~~decided ~~effective~~not to ~~rate~~participate. Some of the members of the Group, including the Company, have been seeking additional information from the NOAA to determine whether cooperation is ~~computed~~possible ~~for~~and ~~each~~whether ~~taxable~~or ~~jurisdiction~~not the Group should reconsider its decision not to participate.

~~During~~Due ~~the~~to ~~six~~uncertainties ~~months~~inherent ~~ended~~in ~~October 31,~~these ~~2005~~matters, ~~the~~management ~~Company~~is ~~recorded~~unable ~~a net increase~~ to ~~its~~estimate ~~valuation~~the ~~allowance~~Company’s ofpotential ~~$292. An increase of $582~~exposure, including ~~related~~possible toremediation ~~the~~or ~~expected~~other ~~non-realization~~environmental ofresponsibilities ~~certain~~that ~~net~~may ~~operating~~result ~~losses~~from inthese ~~the~~matters ~~State~~at ofthis ~~Ohio,~~time; ~~was~~such ~~recorded~~information ~~along~~is ~~with~~not anexpected ~~additional~~to ~~increase~~be ofknown ~~$743~~ for ~~net~~a ~~operating~~number ~~losses~~of ~~which are~~years. These ~~expected~~uncertainties toprimarily ~~expire~~include ~~unused.~~the ~~These~~completion ~~increases~~and outcome ~~were~~of ~~offset~~the byenvironmental ~~non-expiring~~study ~~state~~and ~~tax~~the ~~credits~~percentage of ~~$1,033~~contamination/natural ~~which~~resource damage, ~~based~~if ~~on initial tax planning strategies~~any, ~~are~~ultimately ~~expected~~determined to be ~~realized.~~attributable ~~However,~~to the Company ~~continually~~and ~~evaluates~~other ~~and~~parties. It ~~modifies~~is ~~strategies and~~possible that the Company’s ultimate ~~form~~liability resulting offrom ~~utilization~~this ofissue ~~these~~could ~~tax~~be ~~credits may change~~material.

~~Also~~- ~~during~~11 ~~this~~- period, the Company repatriated approximately $612 in dividends from its European subsidiary. Taxes for this repatriation were provided for at April 30, 2005 and this transaction reduced the Company’s deferred tax asset for the net operating loss by approximately $216.

7.Table COMMITMENTof AND CONTINGENCIESContents

~~The~~THE ~~Company~~NEWARK ~~and its subsidiaries are party to various claims~~GROUP, ~~legal actions, complaints and administrative proceedings, including workers’ compensation and environmental claims, arising in the ordinary course of business~~INC. InAND ~~management’s~~SUBSIDIARIES ~~opinion, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.~~

810. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company ~~operates~~identifies its reportable segments in accordance with FAS 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” by reviewing the nature of products sold, nature of the production processes, type and class of customer, methods to distribute product and nature of regulatory environment. Profits from intercompany sales are not transferred between segments, they remain within the segment in which the sales originated. The Company principally ~~three~~operates ~~business~~in three reportable segments which include five product lines.

The Paperboard segment consists of facilities that manufacture recycled paperboard and facilities that collect, sort and process recovered paper for internal consumption and sales to other paper manufacturers. Inter-segment sales are recorded at prices which approximate market prices.

The Converted Products segment is principally made up of facilities that laminate, cut and form paperboard into fiber components for tubes and cores, protective packaging, books, games and office products. Inter-segment sales are recorded at prices which approximate market prices.

The International segment consists of facilities throughout Europe that are managed separately from North American operations. The vertical integration of this segment offers both paperboard manufacturing and converting. ToThere ~~date there~~ are minimal business transactions between the North American segments (Paperboard and Converted Products) and the International segment.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on operating profits and losses of each business segment. Operating results include all costs and expenses directly related to the segment involved. Corporate includes corporate, general, administrative and unallocated expenses.

~~-10-~~Identifiable assets are accumulated by facility within each business segment.

- 12 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Identifiable assets are accumulated by facility within each business segment.

The following table presents certain business segment information for the periods indicated.

	For the Three Months Ended						~~For the Six Months Ended~~
	October 31, 2005			October 31, 2004			October 31, 2005			October 31, 2004
	July 31, 2008			July 31, 2007
				(As Restated)						(As Restated)
Sales (aggregate):
Sales (aggregate):
Paperboard	$	163,035		$	168,491
Paperboard	$	148,442		$	150,306		$	302,564		$	300,521
Converted Products		75,472			80,159
Converted Products		70,893			69,167			142,033			139,221
International		56,151			49,580
International		36,915			36,090			76,097			72,671
Total:	$	294,658		$	298,230
Total:	$	256,250		$	255,563		$	520,694		$	512,413
Less sales (inter-segment):
Less sales (inter-segment):
Paperboard	$	(37,967	)	$	(40,411	)
Paperboard	$	(36,487	)	$	(36,743	)	$	(74,483	)	$	(75,734	)
Converted Products		(1,028	)		(2,144	)
Converted Products		(1,891	)		(1,779	)		(3,898	)		(3,624	)
International		—			—
International		26			24			28			69
Total:	$	(38,995	)	$	(42,555	)
Total:	$	(38,352	)	$	(38,498	)	$	(78,353	)	$	(79,289	)
Sales (external customers):
Sales (external customers):
Paperboard	$	125,068		$	128,080
Paperboard	$	111,955		$	113,563		$	228,081		$	224,787
Converted Products		74,444			78,015
Converted Products		69,002			67,388			138,135			135,597
International		56,151			49,580
International		36,941			36,114			76,125			72,740
Total:	$	255,663		$	255,675
Total:	$	217,898		$	217,065		$	442,341		$	433,124
Operating (Loss) Income:
Operating Income:
Paperboard	$	(7,071	)	$	10,735
Paperboard	$	4,668		$	8,745		$	10,820		$	16,588
Converted Products		772			1,360
Converted Products		(657	)		(2,276	)		(2,281	)		(3,906	)
International		2,496			3,527
International		3,773			4,782			7,624			8,724
Total Segment Operating (Loss) Income:		(3,803	)		15,622
Total Segment Operating Income:		7,784			11,251			16,163			21,406
Corporate Expense		2,858			4,390
Corporate Expense		4,048			3,984			8,086			7,293
Total Operating (Loss) Income:		(6,661	)		11,232
Total Operating Income:		3,736			7,267			8,077			14,113
Interest Expense		(6,691	)		(6,937	)
Interest Expense		(6,613	)		(6,243	)		(12,870	)		(12,403	)
Interest Income		85			867
Interest Income		52			20			53			41
Equity in Income of Affiliates		331			731
Equity in Income of Affiliates		434			494			1,012			1,022
Other Income, Net		436			16
Other (Expense) Income, Net		(124	)		15			(426	)		290
(Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes		(12,500	)		5,909
(Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes		(2,515	)		1,553			(4,154	)		3,063
Income Tax Expense		825			976
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense		(1,276	)		356			(1,561	)		1,096
Net (Loss) Earnings	$	(13,325	)	$	4,933
(Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations	$	(1,239	)	$	1,197		$	(2,593	)	$	1,967
Depreciation and Amortization:
Depreciation and Amortization:
Paperboard	$	5,897		$	6,050
Paperboard	$	5,720		$	5,375		$	11,437		$	10,660
Converted Products		1,129			1,213
Converted Products		1,319			1,135			2,624			2,206
International		1,037			926
International		1,062			1,121			2,125			2,072
Corporate		446			440
Corporate		545			573			1,092			1,113
Total:	$	8,509		$	8,629
Total:	$	8,646		$	8,204		$	17,278		$	16,051
Purchases of Property, Plant and Equipment:
Purchases of Property, Plant and Equipment:
Paperboard	$	3,925		$	3,205
Paperboard	$	3,940		$	2,593		$	7,071		$	6,003
Converted Products		533			421
Converted Products		710			1,254			1,030			3,009
International		483			1,507
International		185			76			629			186
Corporate		87			—
Corporate		129			32			140			47
Total:	$	5,028		$	5,133
Total:	$	4,964		$	3,955		$	8,870		$	9,245
	July 31, 2008			April 30, 2008
							October 31, 2005			April 30, 2005
Identifiable Assets:
Identifiable Assets:
Paperboard	$	316,645		$	327,589
Paperboard							$	331,776		$	332,259
Converted Products		91,703			90,520
Converted Products								97,206			97,479
International		190,725			191,762
International								127,364			137,606
Corporate		12,000			12,357
Corporate								34,704			32,740
Total:	$	611,073		$	622,228
Total:							$	591,050		$	600,084

~~-11-~~The amounts of investments in equity method investees in the Paperboard segment at July 31 and April 30, 2008 are $1,210 and $1,427, respectively. The amounts of investments in equity method investees in the International segment at July 31 and April 30, 2008 are $20,589 and $20,467, respectively.

- 13 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Geographic Regions

Sales to ~~unaffiliated~~external customers (based on country of origin) and long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows:

	October 31,2005		October 31,2004
	July 31,2008		July 31,2007
Sales to Unaffiliated Customers
Sales to External Customers
United States	$	~~361~~195,~~024~~537	$	~~355~~202,~~874~~597
Europe		7656,~~125~~151		7249,~~740~~580
Canada		53,~~192~~975		43,~~510~~498
Total	$	~~442~~255,~~341~~663	$	~~433~~255,~~124~~675
	October 31, 2005		April 30,2005
	July 31,2008		April 30,2008
Net Property, Plant and Equipment, Goodwill and Intangibles
United States	$	~~294~~258,~~468~~712	$	~~301~~264,~~979~~636
Europe		5475,~~229~~778		5975,~~452~~449
Canada		7,~~204~~098		67,~~793~~291
Total	$	~~355~~341,~~901~~588	$	~~368~~347,~~224~~376

911. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The ~~Company~~paperboard ~~leases~~mills ~~its~~in our ~~corporate~~International ~~headquarters~~segment ~~located~~purchased atapproximately 20$4,341 ~~Jackson~~and ~~Drive~~$4,006 ~~Cranford,~~of ~~New~~raw ~~Jersey~~material from ~~Jackson~~affiliated ~~Drive~~entities ~~Corp.,~~accounted afor ~~corporation~~as ~~owned~~equity bymethod ~~two Directors~~investments ofduring the ~~Company. For each of the six~~three-month periods ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~2004~~2007, ~~the amount paid to that company under the lease was $174~~respectively.

OnThe ~~August 10,~~International ~~2005,~~segment ~~the~~also ~~Company~~recorded ~~completed~~sales ~~the purchase from its former Chairman and current Director~~ of ~~the~~approximately ~~198~~$1,~~000~~373 ~~shares~~and ~~of the Company’s common stock owned by him. On July 5~~$1,008 ~~2005, this director had exercised his right~~ to ~~“put”~~two ~~the~~affiliated ~~subject~~entities ~~stock~~accounted tofor ~~the Company pursuant to a May 1, 1980 agreement,~~ as ~~amended.~~equity ~~The~~method ~~aggregate purchase price for the stock was $7,875,~~investments ~~which~~during ~~amount is to be paid pursuant to a Subordinated Installment Promissory Note (~~the ~~“Note”),~~three-month ~~with~~periods ~~$788~~ended ~~plus accrued interest paid on August~~July 1831, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~the balance being due in 40 equal and consecutive quarterly installments~~2007, ~~with interest, commencing on October 1, 2005, and continuing thereafter on the first day of the months of January, April, July and October~~respectively. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal balance of the Note at the prime rate of interest as in effect from time to time. The obligation under the Note is classified as Subordinated Debt on the consolidated balance sheets.

The ~~paperboard~~Company ~~mills~~paid ~~in our International segment purchased~~ approximately $41,~~379~~758 and $41,~~934~~337 ofto Integrated ~~raw~~Paper ~~material~~Recyclers, ~~from~~LLC, an affiliated ~~entities~~entity accounted for as an equity method ~~investments~~investment, primarily for hauling services of recyclable material during the ~~six~~three-month periods ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~2004~~2007, respectively.

~~The~~12. ~~International~~FAIR ~~segment~~VALUE ~~also recorded sales of approximately $1,064 and $830 to two affiliated entities accounted for as equity method investments during the six-month periods ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.~~ MEASUREMENTS

~~The~~On May 1, 2008, the Company ~~paid~~adopted ~~approximately~~the ~~$2,533~~provisions of FAS 157 to its financial assets and ~~$2,506~~financial liabilities. FAS 157 requires quantitative disclosures using a tabular format in all reporting periods and qualitative disclosures about the valuation techniques used to measure ~~Integrated~~fair ~~Paper~~value ~~Recyclers,~~in ~~LLC~~all annual periods. In February 2008, anthe ~~affiliated~~FASB ~~entity~~deferred ~~accounted~~the implementation of this standard for asall annon-financial ~~equity~~assets ~~method~~and ~~investment~~non-financial liabilities, ~~primarily~~except ~~for~~those ~~hauling~~recognized ~~services~~or ofdisclosed ~~recyclable~~at ~~material~~fair ~~during~~value in the financial ~~six~~statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company does not currently have any non-~~month~~financial ~~periods~~assets ~~ended~~or ~~October 31,~~non-financial ~~2005~~liabilities ~~and~~that ~~2004,~~are ~~respectively~~measure at fair value on a recurring basis.

~~-12-~~Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. FAS 157 requires that these financial assets and liabilities be classified into one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

- 14 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description	July 31, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Liabilities:
Over-the-counter natural gas purchase contracts	$	907	$	—	$	907	$	—
Cross-currency interest rate swaps	$	16,312	$	—	$	16,312	$	—

As a result of the Company’s global operating and financing activities, it is exposed to market risks from changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices, which may adversely affect the Company’s operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, the Company minimizes its risks from foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations through the use of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes and the Company does not use leveraged derivative financial instruments.

The fair value of cross-currency interest rate swaps are characterized as Level 2 since the measurements are based upon observable inputs such as interest rates, yield curves and spot and future exchange rates.

The fair value of over-the-counter natural gas purchase contracts are characterized as Level 2 since the measurements are based on exchange-traded natural gas contracts with terms similar to the contracts entered into by the Company.

13.

COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)/INCOME

Comprehensive (loss)/income is comprised of net (loss)/earnings, pension adjustments, foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale securities and changes in fair value of derivative instruments. Comprehensive (loss)/income for the periods ended July 31, 2008 and 2007 were a loss of $14,297 and income of $3,558, respectively.

14.

OTHER MATTERS

In early June 2008, the Company closed on the acquisition of a cogeneration facility located next to its mill in Viersen, Germany. The Company paid approximately $420 towards the total price in February 2008 and $829 as final payment in early June 2008. Included in the final payment was $235 in refundable VAT tax.

During the quarter ended July 31, 2008, the Company sold certain water rights at one of its paperboard mills in California for $1,100, recording a gain of $975 from the sale. This gain was recorded as a reduction to cost of sales as it represents a recovery of expenditures originally recorded as cost of sales.

During the quarter ended July 31, 2007, the Company received a $2,861 settlement resulting from state sales-tax related litigation. Of this total, $2,054 was recorded as a reduction to cost of sales as it represented a refund of sales taxes paid which were originally recorded to cost of sales. The remainder, $807, was for interest on the principal amount of the settlement and was recorded on the Interest income line on our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

- 15 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

15.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On August 12, 2008, the Company finalized amendments to the existing financial covenants, along with certain other items, of its existing credit-linked senior secured credit facility. The necessity for the amendments stemmed from losses in each of the last three fiscal years, which would have resulted in the Company not being in compliance with its existing financial covenants at July 31, 2008. The Company’s operating plans for fiscal 2009 contain assumptions regarding revenues, expenses and cash flows. Achieving the results of the 2009 operating plan will enable the Company to comply with the amended financial covenants, while the failure to meet operating plan results may limit the Company’s ability to comply with those amended covenants. Management believes in the Company’s ability to achieve the 2009 operating plan results, comply with the amended financial covenants and generate sufficient cash to satisfy its operating requirements in the normal course of business. In the event actual results do not approximate the operating plans, management believes they could execute contingency plans to address such circumstances. Such plans include other cost reductions and seeking additional or alternative sources of financing.

The most significant changes in the amendment include (i) an increase to the credit spread to 5.5% on prime rate borrowings or 6.5% on Eurodollar rate borrowings, (ii) required quarterly installment payments of $1,000, beginning on July 31, 2009 on any outstanding term loan balance, (iii) scheduled prepayments in September 2008 and 2009 of the US dollar equivalent of Euros 3,000 and Euros 8,917, respectively and (iv) a Senior Leverage Ratio (as defined) for the twelve month periods ended July 31, 2008, October 31, 2008, January 31, 2009 and April 30, 2009 (and thereafter) of 4.75:1.0, 4.50:1.0, 3.50:1.0 and 3.00:1.0, respectively. Additionally, the Company no longer has the one-time option to increase the amounts of either the asset-based or credit-linked facilities and letters of credit issued under the credit-linked facility will have a credit spread of 6.5%.

- 16 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

The following discussion of operations and financial condition of The Newark Group should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and onin the Annual Report on Form 10-K ~~dated~~for the year ended April 30, ~~2005~~2008.

This report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by use of terms such as “may,” “~~will,” “~~should,” “plan,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. Forward-looking statements represent our management’s judgment regarding future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report regarding our financial position, business strategy, products, plans, or objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the forward-looking statements, and you should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including the statements under “Risk Factors” and “Critical Accounting Policies” detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, ~~2005~~2008. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

The Newark Group is an integrated producer of 100% recycled paperboard and paperboard products with leading market positions in North America and Europe. We primarily manufacture folding carton ~~(predominately uncoated)~~, core board and industrial converting grades of paperboard, and are among the largest producers of these grades in North America. We are also a leading producer of laminated products and graphicboard in North America and Europe as well as a major producer of tubes, cores and allied products in North America. We supply our products to the paper, packaging, stationery, book printing, construction, plastic film, furniture and game industries. In addition, we are engaged in the collection, trading and processing of recovered paper in North America and believe that we are among the ~~five~~six largest participants in this industry. No single customer accounted for more than 23.86% of our sales in our fiscal year ended April 30, ~~2005~~ 2008.

We operate in three segments—Paperboard, Converted Products and International—and our products ~~can~~are be categorized into five product lines: (i) recovered paper; (ii) 100% recycled paperboard; (iii) laminated products and graphicboard; (iv) tube, core and allied products; and (v) solidboard packaging ~~products~~. In our Paperboard segment we handle recovered paper and manufacture grades of recycled paperboard used in the production of folding cartons, rigid boxes, tubes, cores and other products. In our Converted Products segment we manufacture tubes, cores and allied products, solidboard packaging and products used for book covers, game boards, jigsaw puzzles and loose-leaf binders. In our International segment, which consists of a vertically integrated network of facilities in Europe, we ~~manufacture~~produce 100% recycled paperboard, laminated products ~~and~~ , graphicboard and solidboard packaging, primarily for the European market.

For the fiscal year ended April 30, ~~2005~~2008, the Paperboard segment represented 5251% of our total sales, the Converted Products segment represented 3028% of our total sales and the International segment represented 1821% of our total sales.

Our fiscal year ends April 30. All references to years, quarters or other periods in this section refer to fiscal years, quarters or periods whether or not specifically indicated. ~~Most~~Percentages ~~percentages~~ and dollar ~~amounts~~ amounts have been rounded to aid presentation. ~~As a result, all such figures are approximations.~~

Our operating results are primarily influenced by sales price and volume, mill capacity utilization, recovered paper cost, energy ~~cost~~costs and freight costs. ~~Our~~Sales ~~sales~~ volumes are generally driven by overall economic conditions and more specifically by consumer non-durable goods consumption. Overcapacity and an overall sluggish US economy have affected operating rates within the industry, resulting in our mill utilization rates being 94% in the quarter ended July 31, 2008 compared to 97% in the same quarter of the prior year. In an effort to bring capacity in line with industry demand, between May 2008 and July 2008, we and others in the industry have recently announced mill and paper machine shut downs that will eliminate approximately 300,000 tons of excess capacity once fully implemented.

~~Sales~~Recovered ~~volumes~~paper ~~are~~is ~~also~~our ~~impacted~~most bysignificant ~~the~~raw ~~highly~~material, ~~competitive~~and ~~environment~~the incost ~~which~~of wesuch ~~operate.~~paper ~~This~~has ~~competition,~~historically ~~combined~~fluctuated ~~with~~significantly ~~the~~due ~~business~~to ~~slowdown~~market ~~that~~and ~~began~~industry ~~during~~conditions. ~~fiscal~~Our average ~~year~~North ~~2000,~~American ~~resulted~~recovered inpaper ~~decreased~~cost ~~industry~~per ~~capacity~~ton ~~utilization~~of ~~rates, which~~paperboard ~~for~~produced uswas ~~hit~~$108 aper ~~low~~ton ~~of 89%~~ in ~~fiscal~~2006, ~~2002.~~rose Asto a$123 ~~result,~~per weton ~~initiated~~in a2007 ~~mill~~and ~~capacity~~then ~~rationalization~~rose ~~program~~again ~~which~~to ~~led~~$156 toper ~~the~~ton ~~closures~~in of2008, ~~five~~resulting ~~paperboard~~in ~~mills~~a ~~between~~45% ~~October~~increase ~~2001~~in ~~and~~just ~~July~~two ~~2003~~years. ~~Combined,~~This ~~these~~escalation ~~five closures resulted~~ in a ~~capacity~~recovered ~~reduction~~paper ofcosts ~~approximately~~slowed ~~300,000~~a ~~tons~~bit ~~per~~but ~~year,~~continued ~~which~~into ~~led~~our tofirst ~~approximately~~quarter ~~$30~~ended ~~million~~July 31, ~~per~~2008, ~~year~~where ofour ~~overhead~~costs ~~savings~~rose ~~and~~2% ~~loss~~to ~~avoidance.~~$159 Asper aton ~~result~~compared ofto ~~these~~average ~~closures,~~2008 ~~and~~costs. aWhen ~~shift~~comparing ofaverage ~~business~~costs toon ~~other~~a ~~mills~~quarterly basis, our ~~paperboard~~North ~~mills’~~American per-ton ~~capacity~~recovered ~~utilization~~paper ~~rates~~cost ~~were~~increased 9511% ~~for~~in the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005,~~2008 ~~despite~~when ~~our~~compared ~~loss~~to of$144 ~~approximately~~per ~~four~~ton ~~machine days of production~~ in ~~our~~the ~~southeastern~~same USquarter ~~mill~~of ~~during a two-day shutdown in~~ the ~~quarter~~prior ~~ended~~year. ~~July 31,~~Recovered ~~2005 due~~paper tocosts ~~Hurricane~~in ~~Dennis~~our ~~and~~International ~~the~~segment ~~loss~~have ofdecreased ~~another~~slightly ~~sixteen~~in ~~machine days at~~ the ~~same mill during the~~ quarter ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2005~~2008 ~~due~~ to ~~Hurricane~~€115 per ~~Katrina. Additionally~~ton, indown ~~September~~from ~~2005,~~€121 per weton ~~announced~~during the ~~closure~~same ~~of our Natick,~~

-13 17 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

MA quarter ~~mill.~~of ~~This~~the ~~will~~prior ~~reduce~~fiscal ~~overall~~year. ~~production~~However, ~~capacity~~when byfactoring ~~48,000~~in ~~tons~~the ~~per~~effects ~~annum,~~of ~~though~~foreign wecurrency ~~expect~~exchange torates, ~~transfer~~our ~~nearly~~average ~~all~~per-ton ~~tons~~recovered ~~currently~~paper costs ~~produced~~increased at9% ~~Natick~~ to ~~our~~$179 ~~other~~per ~~mills.~~ton ~~This~~in ~~closure~~the isquarter ~~expected~~ended toJuly 31, ~~result~~2008 incompared ~~approximately~~to $~~3.0~~164 ~~million~~ per ~~year~~ton in ~~fixed-cost~~the ~~savings~~same quarter of last year.

~~Recovered~~Energy, which consists of electricity, natural gas and fuel oil used to generate steam for use in the paper making process, is ~~our~~also ~~most~~a significant ~~raw~~manufacturing ~~material~~cost for us. ~~Historically~~Average energy costs per ton of paperboard produced in our North American mill system increased 34% in the quarter ended July 31, 2008 to $112 per ton when compared to $84 per ton in the ~~cost~~same quarter of ~~recovered~~the ~~paper~~prior ~~has~~fiscal ~~fluctuated~~year. These costs are significantly ~~due~~higher tothan ~~market~~what ~~and~~we ~~industry~~experienced ~~conditions.~~at ~~For example,~~the ~~our~~early ~~average~~part ~~North~~of ~~American~~the ~~recovered~~decade, ~~paper~~where our average energy cost per ton of paperboard produced ~~declined~~was ~~from~~just $~~101~~43 ~~per~~in ~~ton~~2000. The rise in ~~fiscal~~costs ~~2001~~is due to ~~$75~~overall ~~per~~increases ~~ton~~in natural gas, fuel oil and electricity prices. We believe that prices will likely remain at these elevated levels in ~~fiscal~~response ~~2002~~to conditions in the Middle East, apotential ~~decrease~~natural gas shortages in the United States, the relationship of ~~26%~~the price of natural gas in relation to crude oil prices and other economic conditions and the related uncertainties regarding the outcome and implications of such events. Our operating margins are adversely affected when energy costs increase, ~~before~~notwithstanding ~~increasing~~that we attempt to manage fluctuations in our energy costs by 35utilizing financial hedges and purchasing forward contracts for a portion of our energy needs. As of July 31, 2008, we had approximately 20% of our natural gas needs through November 2008 hedged at prices favorable to ~~$102~~targeted ~~per~~levels. ~~ton~~Energy costs in ~~fiscal~~Western ~~2003.~~Europe ~~Fiscal~~are ~~2004 saw~~at elevated levels compared to just a ~~slight~~few ~~reduction~~years ofago, particularly 3%relating to ~~$99~~natural gas. In 2006, our average energy cost per ton ~~though~~of ~~recovered~~paperboard ~~paper~~produced ~~prices~~in ~~increased~~our byinternational ~~$17~~mills ~~per~~was ~~ton~~€40, orbut 17that rose 43%, to ~~$116~~an average of €58 per ton in ~~fiscal~~2007 ~~2005~~and remained at that level for fiscal 2008. For the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008, ~~recovered~~our ~~paper~~average ~~prices~~energy ~~decreased~~price $3 per ton ~~from~~of ~~the average~~paperboard ~~fiscal~~produced ~~2005~~was ~~prices~~€62, to7% ~~$113~~higher ~~per~~than ~~ton,~~average 2008 costs and $315% ~~per~~higher ~~ton~~than ~~when~~our ~~compared~~average tocost in the ~~second~~ quarter ofended ~~fiscal~~July 31, ~~2005~~2007.

~~Energy,~~We ~~which~~attempt ~~consists~~to ofraise ~~electricity~~our ~~and~~selling ~~fuel~~prices ~~used~~in response to ~~generate~~increases ~~steam~~in ~~for~~raw ~~use~~material inand ~~the~~energy ~~paper~~costs. ~~making process~~However, iswe ~~also~~are anot ~~significant~~always ~~manufacturing~~able ~~cost~~to ~~for~~pass ~~us.~~the ~~The~~full ~~average energy~~amount ~~cost~~of inthese ~~our~~costs through ~~North~~to ~~American~~our ~~mill~~customers ~~system~~on ~~has~~a ~~increased~~timely ~~substantially~~basis, inif ~~recent~~at ~~years~~all, ~~averaging~~and ~~approximately~~as ~~$73~~a result, ~~$68~~cannot ~~and~~always ~~$58~~maintain ~~per~~our ~~ton~~operating ofmargins ~~paperboard produced~~ in ~~fiscal~~the ~~years~~face ~~2005,~~of ~~2004~~cost ~~and~~increases. ~~2003,~~We ~~respectively,~~experience asa ~~compared~~reduction toin ~~$43~~margin ~~per~~during ~~ton~~periods inof ~~2000. This~~recovered ~~increase~~paper ~~primarily~~price isincreases due to customary ~~overall~~time ~~increases~~lags in ~~natural~~implementing ~~gas,~~our ~~fuel~~price ~~oil~~increases ~~and~~to ~~electricity~~our ~~prices~~customers. WeEven ~~expect~~if ~~that~~we ~~prices~~are ~~may~~able ~~continue~~ to ~~rise~~recover infuture ~~response~~cost ~~to conditions in the Middle East~~increases, ~~natural~~our ~~gas~~operating ~~shortages~~margins ~~in the United States~~ and ~~other economic~~results ~~conditions~~of ~~and~~operations ~~the~~may ~~related~~be ~~uncertainties~~materially ~~regarding the outcome~~ and ~~implications of such events. Our operating margins are~~ adversely affected ~~when~~by ~~energy~~time ~~costs~~delays ~~increase, notwithstanding that we attempt to manage fluctuations~~ in ~~our energy~~the ~~costs~~implementation byof ~~utilizing~~price ~~financial~~increases. ~~hedges~~Price ~~and~~increases ~~purchasing~~on ~~forward~~all ~~contracts~~grades ~~for a portion~~ of ~~our~~uncoated ~~energy~~recycled ~~needs.~~paperboard, ~~Despite~~graphicboard, ~~our hedging efforts~~tubes, ~~our~~cores ~~average~~and ~~energy~~other ~~cost~~allied ~~per~~products ~~ton~~were ~~for~~announced ~~the~~throughout ~~current~~December ~~fiscal~~2007 ~~quarter~~and ~~ended~~January ~~October 31,~~2008. ~~2005~~Further ~~was~~price ~~$83,~~increases anwere ~~increase of~~announced ~~31%~~in ~~when~~July ~~compared~~2008 toon ~~the~~all ~~same~~grades ~~fiscal quarter~~ of ~~2005.~~recycled ~~During~~paperboard, ~~the second quarter ended October 31~~graphicboard, ~~2005~~tubes, incores anand ~~effort~~allied toproducts. ~~offset~~Full ~~the~~realization ~~increased~~of ~~fuel costs, we~~ announced aprice ~~fuel~~increases ~~surcharge~~and onthe ~~our~~timing ~~finished~~of ~~products~~such ~~across~~realization ~~our~~is ~~North~~impacted ~~American~~by ~~segments that~~many ~~will~~factors beincluding incompetition, ~~place~~the ~~until~~general astate of ~~certain~~the ~~natural~~economy ~~gas~~and ~~indexed~~contractual ~~price~~obligations. ~~hits~~When acomparing ~~predetermined~~the ~~level.~~quarters ~~The~~ended ~~benefits~~July 31, of2008 ~~this~~and ~~surcharge~~2007, ~~only~~average ~~began~~North toAmerican besales ~~realized~~price ~~during~~for ~~the~~our ~~last~~converted ~~month~~products ofincreased ~~the quarter~~9%, ~~and~~or as$78 aper ~~result~~ton, ~~the~~and ~~full~~average ~~impact~~sales onprice for our ~~results~~recycled paperboard ofproducts ~~operations has~~increased ~~not~~3%, ~~yet~~or ~~been~~$15 ~~realized~~per ton.

We attempt to raise our selling prices in response to increases in raw material and energy costs. However, we are not always able to pass the full amount of these costs through to our customers on a timely basis, if at all, and as a result, cannot maintain our operating margins in the face of meaningful cost increases. We experience a reduction in margin during periods of recovered paper cost increases due to customary time lags in implementing our price increases to our customers. Even if we are able to recover future cost increases, our operating margins and results of operations still will be materially and adversely affected by time delays in the implementation of price increases. Price increases for sales from our Paperboard and Converted Products segments were announced commencing in April 2004, with a second price increase announced in September 2004.

Our Results of Operations

The following table sets out our segmented financial and operating information for the periods indicated. ~~All prior periods have been restated to reflect the Company’s change in inventory valuation (see Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).~~

	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	Three Months EndedJuly 31,
(in thousands)	~~2005~~2008		~~2004~~2007		~~2005~~		~~2004~~
			(As Restated)				(As Restated)
Net Sales
Net Sales
Paperboard	$	125,068	$	128,080
Paperboard	$	111,955	$	113,563	$	228,081	$	224,787
Converted Products		74,444		78,015
Converted Products		69,002		67,388		138,135		135,597
International		56,151		49,580
International		36,941		36,114		76,125		72,740
Total	$	255,663	$	255,675
Total	$	217,898	$	217,065	$	442,341	$	433,124
Cost of Sales
Cost of Sales
Paperboard	$	119,098	$	109,445
Paperboard	$	98,678	$	96,368	$	200,533	$	191,202
Converted Products		68,915		71,530
Converted Products		64,571		64,106		129,739		128,006
International		48,541		42,379
International		30,632		28,089		62,740		57,031
Total	$	236,554	$	223,354
Corporate		—		471		—		239
Restructuring
Total	$	193,881	$	189,034	$	393,012	$	376,478
Paperboard	$	4,877	$	111
Total	$	4,877	$	111

-14 18 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

	Three Months Ended October 31						Six Months Ended October 31
	Three Months EndedJuly 31,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
(in thousands)	2008			2007
				(As Restated)						(As Restated)
SG&A
SG&A
Paperboard	$	8,164		$	7,789
Paperboard	$	8,246		$	8,511		$	16,231		$	16,824
Converted Products		4,757			5,125
Converted Products		5,033			5,370			10,091			10,592
International		5,114			3,674
International		2,536			3,243			5,761			6,985
Corporate		2,858			4,390
Corporate		4,049			3,512			7,920			7,054
Total	$	20,893		$	20,978
Total	$	19,864		$	20,636		$	40,003		$	41,455
Operating Income (Loss)
Restructuring
Paperboard	$	(7,071	)	$	10,735
Paperboard	$	362		$	(60	)	$	497		$	173
Converted Products		772			1,360
Converted Products		55			188			586			905
International		2,496			3,527
Corporate		—(2,858	)		—(4,390	)		~~166~~			—
Total	$	~~417~~(6,661	)	$	~~128~~11,232		$	~~1,249~~		$	~~1,078~~
Operating Income (Loss)
Paperboard	$	4,668		$	8,745		$	10,820		$	16,588
Converted Products		(657	)		(2,276	)		(2,281	)		(3,906	)
International		3,773			4,782			7,624			8,724
Corporate		(4,048	)		(3,984	)		(8,086	)		(7,293	)
Total	$	3,736		$	7,267		$	8,077		$	14,113

The following table sets forth certain items related to our consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated. A detailed discussion of the material changes in our operating results is set forth below.

	Three Months ended October 31,				Six Months ended October 31,
	Three Months EndedJuly 31
	2005		2004		2005		2004
	2008		2007
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	~~100.0~~	%	~~100.0~~	%
Cost of sales	8992.05		87.14		~~88.8~~		~~86.9~~
Selling, general and administration expenses	98.12		98.52		~~9.0~~		~~9.6~~
Restructuring and impairments	01.29		~~0.1~~—		~~0.3~~		~~0.2~~
Operating income	1.7		3.3		1.8		3.3
Operating (loss) income	(2.6	)	4.4
Interest expense	32.06		2.97		~~2.9~~		~~2.9~~
Income tax expense	(0.63	)	0.24		~~(0.4~~	)	~~0.3~~
Net earnings	(0.6	)	0.6		(0.6	)	0.5
Net (loss) earnings	(5.2	)	1.9

Results of Operations

~~Six~~Period ~~Months~~ Ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 Compared to ~~Six~~Period ~~Months~~ Ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2004~~2007

Overview

~~Net~~As ~~Sales~~more fully described below, we experienced a very challenging first quarter in fiscal 2009, resulting in a net loss of $13.3 ~~Net~~million ~~sales~~compared ~~for~~to net earnings of $4.9 million in the ~~six~~same ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~October 31~~the prior year as the acceleration of input costs far outweighed advances from price increase realization. In addition to our operating loss, ~~2005~~we ~~were~~used $~~442~~4.3 million of cash in operating activities compared to generating $28.3 million in the prior year. From a cash perspective, 2%in ~~greater~~addition ~~than~~to the $~~433~~18.13 million decrease in net earnings, we had a net decrease in accounts payable in the ~~same~~current ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~of $7.3 million compared to an increase in last year’s quarter, a negative change of $13.8 million. We also had a $2.9 million decrease in changes in current assets when comparing the ~~prior~~current quarter to the same quarter of last year. ~~This~~Management ~~increase~~has istaken ~~predominantly~~several ~~the~~steps ~~result~~in an effort to reverse these negative results of operations and cash usage, including the ~~realization~~July 2008 shut-down of ~~previously~~one ~~announced~~of ~~price~~two ~~increases~~paper inmachines at one of our California mills, as well as the permanent closure in late August 2008 of two other mills, one in North ~~American~~Hoosick, ~~segments~~New York and the other in Haverhill, aMassachusetts. ~~17%~~The ~~increase~~full and partial cessation of operations at these facilities is expected to yield substantial benefits through both cost reduction and earnings improvement. Additionally, in ~~foreign~~July 2008, we announced price ~~converting~~increases ~~sales~~on ~~volume~~a number of our products and expect to realize the majority of these increases, which will have a 1%direct ~~increase~~positive inimpact ~~foreign~~to ~~converting~~our ~~sales~~bottom ~~price~~line.

~~Cost~~Net of Sales. ~~Cost~~Net of sales for ~~the~~each ~~six~~of ~~months~~the periods ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 ~~increased~~and 4%2007 towere $~~393~~255.07 ~~from $376~~million.5 ~~million~~Higher ~~during~~sales ~~the~~prices ~~six~~across ~~months~~all ~~ended October 31~~segments, ~~2004.~~increased ~~This~~volumes ~~increase~~in ~~was~~our ~~driven~~International bysegment ~~increases~~and ina ~~both~~weaker ~~energy~~US ~~and freight~~dollar ~~costs,~~versus ~~which~~the ~~increased~~Euro ~~21%~~were offset ~~and~~by ~~11%,~~lower ~~respectively,~~volumes orin ~~approximately~~our ~~$8.2~~North ~~million~~American ~~and $5~~operations.0 ~~million, respectively.~~

~~SG&A~~Cost of Sales. ~~SG&A~~Cost ~~decreased~~of 4%sales infor the ~~six~~quarter ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 toincreased 6%, or $4013.02 million, asto ~~compared~~$236.6 tomillion from $41223.54 million in the ~~six~~quarter ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2004~~2007. ~~This~~Significant ~~improvement~~increase ~~resulted~~in ~~from~~ the ~~recovery~~costs of ~~debts~~waste ~~that~~paper ~~had~~and ~~been~~energy ~~written~~per ~~off~~ton inof ~~prior~~paperboard ~~periods~~produced in both our ~~International~~North ~~segment~~American and ainternational ~~lower~~mills ~~provision~~drove ~~for bad debts in our North American segments~~costs upward, as ~~well~~did ashigher ~~our~~volumes ~~continued~~in ~~focus~~our on ~~cost reduction initiatives.~~

-15 19 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Restructuring~~ International ~~and Impairments~~segment. WeAdditionally, ~~recorded~~there ~~restructuring~~was ~~charges~~a decrease of $1.20 million ~~during~~in ~~the six~~non-~~month~~routine ~~period~~reductions ~~ended~~to ~~October 31, 2005~~cost asof ~~compared~~sales towhen ~~$1.1~~comparing ~~million during~~ the ~~six-month~~quarters ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2004.~~2008 ~~Current~~to ~~year~~2007. ~~expenses~~This ~~include~~decrease ~~on-going~~resulted ~~costs~~from ~~related~~the toCompany’s ~~previously~~sale ~~shut down operations~~ in ~~our~~2008 ~~Converted~~of ~~Products~~certain ~~and~~water ~~Paperboard~~rights ~~segments,~~at ~~costs~~one ~~for the pending shut-down~~ of ~~our~~its ~~Natick,~~California MAmills ~~mill,~~resulting ~~and~~in a ~~loss~~recorded ongain ~~the sale~~ of ~~a previously restructured facility sold in June 2005~~$1.0 ~~Included~~million incompared ~~the~~to ~~charges for~~ the ~~six~~Company’s ~~months~~recorded ~~ended~~gain ~~October 31, 2005 are non-cash impairment charges~~ of $02.10 million ~~related~~ toin ~~our~~2007 ~~Natick,~~from MAa ~~mill~~state ~~and~~sales-tax $0related settlement.3 ~~million~~Partially ~~for~~offsetting the ~~impairment~~above ofitems awere ~~facility~~lower costs in our ~~Converted~~North ~~Products~~American ~~segment~~converting operations due to lower volumes.

~~Operating~~Restructuring ~~Income~~and Impairments. ~~Operating~~Restructuring ~~income~~and ~~was~~impairment ~~43%~~charges ~~lower~~totaled $4.9 million during the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 ~~when~~as compared to ~~the~~$0.1 ~~six-month~~million ~~period~~during the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004,~~2007. orThe majority of current year expenses, $84.16 million, ~~compared~~relates to ~~$14~~the shut downs of two paperboard mills in the northeastern United States and one of the paper machines at one of our California mills which were announced in May and June 2008.1 The remainder of current year expenses represents costs to exit previously shut down locations in our Paperboard segment. Approximately $2.7 million, ~~respectively~~of the total current quarter costs were non-cash asset impairment charges. ~~This~~These ~~decrease~~non-cash isimpairment charges ~~mainly~~are based on estimates made by management. Management’s initial estimates are based on expected proceeds realization from the ~~result~~used ofequipment and/or scrap metal markets at the ~~increased~~time ~~energy~~of ~~costs~~determination, and ~~freight~~these ~~costs~~estimates may change significantly based on conditions in those markets. Additional non-cash impairment charges recorded in the current quarter on the paper machine at one of our California mills was due to deteriorating pricing conditions in the used paper machine market.

SG&A. SG&A costs remained relatively flat when comparing the quarters ended July 31, 2008 and 2007 at $20.9 million and $21.0 million, respectively. Costs in our International segment rose due to costs from the German mill that we acquired in the second quarter of 2008 and the weaker US dollar in relation to the Euro, and costs in our Paperboard segment rose due to increased headcount as well as higher bad debt and commissions expense. Costs in our Converted Products segment were down due to lower compensation costs, and costs at our corporate office declined due to lower professional fees and a decrease in the reserve for bad debts.

Operating Loss. We incurred an operating loss in the quarter ended July 31, 2008 of $6.7 million compared to operating income of $11.2 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2007 primarily due to increased energy and waste paper costs in our North American and international mills, as well as higher restructuring costs in our Paperboard segment. Lower North American volumes also negatively affected operating results. Somewhat offsetting these negative impacts to operating results was an increase to average sales price across all segments and higher volumes in our International segment.

Paperboard

Net sales in the Paperboard segment for ~~increased~~the bythree ~~$3.3~~months ~~million,~~ended ~~or 2%~~July 31, to2008 were $~~228~~125.1 million, ~~for~~a ~~the~~decrease ~~six~~of ~~months~~$3.0 ~~ended~~million, ~~October 31~~or 2%, ~~2005~~when compared to ~~$224.8 million in~~ the ~~six~~same ~~months~~period ~~ended~~of ~~October 31,~~the ~~2004~~prior year. ~~This~~The ~~increase~~volumes ~~resulted~~of ~~primarily~~sales ~~from~~of ~~the~~recovered ~~realization~~paper ~~of previously~~to ~~announced~~third ~~price~~parties ~~increases~~and onmill ~~our~~recycled paperboard ~~products~~dropped 14% and 5%, asrespectively. ~~well~~Mill asutilization arates 1were 94% ~~increase~~in the current quarter compared to 97% in the ~~volume~~same quarter of ~~recovered~~the ~~paper~~prior weyear ~~sell~~due to ~~third~~weakened ~~parties~~economic ~~offset~~conditions. byPartially aoffsetting 6%the ~~decrease~~factors contributing to reduced net sales were increases in the ~~per~~average ~~ton~~sales price of ~~such~~ recovered paper to third parties and our mill recycled paperboard of 11% and 9%, respectively.

~~Overall~~Cost ~~cost~~ of sales ~~increased~~ was $9119.31 million, orfor 5%the quarter ended July 31, ~~from~~2008 compared to $~~191~~109.24 million in the ~~six~~quarter ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~2007, toan increase of $~~200~~9.57 million, inor 9%. The majority of the ~~current~~increase ~~six-month~~is ~~period.~~due ~~Energy~~to ~~and~~rising ~~freight~~energy ~~cost~~and ~~increases~~waste ~~are~~paper ~~primarily~~costs, ~~responsible~~which ~~for~~rose $28 ~~the~~and ~~growth~~$16, inrespectively, ~~cost~~per ton of ~~sales~~paperboard produced, ~~increasing~~as well as a 22%, orincrease $7in per-ton freight costs.7 ~~million~~Additionally, ~~and~~there ~~12%,~~was ora decrease of $41.20 million, ~~respectively,~~in non-routine reductions to cost of sales when comparing the ~~six~~quarters ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2005~~2008 ~~and~~to ~~2004, respectively~~2007. ~~These~~The ~~increases~~decrease ~~were~~resulted ~~offset~~from bythe Company’s sale in 2008 of certain water rights at one of its California mills resulting in a recorded gain of $1%.0 ~~decline~~million incompared to the ~~overall~~Company’s ~~cost~~recorded gain of ~~recovered~~$2.0 ~~paper~~million in ~~purchased~~2007 from a state sales-tax related settlement.

Restructuring and impairment costs ~~increased~~were $04.39 million in the quarter ended July 31, 2008 compared to $0.51 million in the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2007, ~~from~~an increase of $04.28 million. ~~during~~Approximately ~~the same~~$4.6 ~~period~~million of ~~2004.~~the ~~The~~total ~~charges~~is ~~incurred~~attributable ~~during~~to costs associated with the ~~current~~shut ~~fiscal~~downs ~~year~~of ~~represent~~two ~~continued~~paperboard ~~costs~~mills toin ~~exit~~the ~~previously~~northeastern ~~shut~~United ~~down~~States ~~locations~~and asone of ~~well~~the aspaper ~~new~~machines ~~charges~~at ~~for~~one of the Company’s California mills, all of which were announced ~~upcoming~~in ~~closure~~May and June 2008. The remainder of the ~~Natick,~~costs MAwere ~~plant,~~comprised ~~and~~of ~~include~~charges incurred to exit previously shut down locations. Approximately $02.17 million of of the total current quarter costs were non-cash asset impairment ~~of fixed assets~~charges.

~~Our~~SG&A ~~mill~~expenses ~~utilization~~in ~~rates decreased to 95% during~~ the ~~six~~quarter ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 aswere ~~compared~~$8.2 tomillion, 965% or $0.4 million higher than $7.8 million in the ~~six~~quarter ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~2007, asthe result of ~~our~~increased ~~Mobile,~~bad ALdebts ~~mill~~and ~~losing~~commissions 20expenses, ~~machine~~along ~~days~~with ashigher aheadcount ~~result~~due ofto ~~Hurricanes~~the ~~Dennis~~filling ~~and~~of ~~Katrina~~vacant positions.

~~SG&A~~Operating ~~decreased~~Income 4%for the Paperboard segment decreased from $1610.87 million in the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~ 2007 to an operating loss of $167.21 million in the ~~same~~quarter ended ~~period~~July 31, of2008. ~~2005~~Higher energy, ~~primarily~~waste ~~the~~paper ~~result~~and ofrestructuring acosts, ~~lower~~along ~~provision~~with ~~for~~lower ~~bad~~volumes, ~~debts~~more ~~and~~than ~~overall~~offset ~~cost~~the ~~reduction~~realized ~~initiatives~~price increases.

~~Operating~~- ~~Income~~20 ~~for~~- the Paperboard segment decreased 35%, from $16.6 million in the period ended October 31, 2004 to $10.8 million in the period ended October 31, 2005, primarily due to the increased energy and freight costs.

Converted Products

Net sales in the Converted Products segment increased $2.5 million, or 2%, to $138.1 million for the six-month period ended October 31, 2005 compared to $135.6 million for the six-month period ended October 31, 2004. This increase is mainly due to a 5% increase in sales price resulting from previously announced price increases on our converted products offset by a 4% decrease in volume.

Cost of sales increased $1.7 million, or 1%, in the six-month period ended October 31, 2005 when compared to the six-month period ended October 31, 2004. This increase is the result of higher costs of chemicals and packaging supplies, as well as five additional months of operation at our NSP start-up facility which began production in October 2004.

Restructuring costs were $0.6 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005, a $0.3 million decrease from $0.9 million in the six months ended October 31, 2004. Current year charges reflect continued costs to exit restructured facilities. Prior year costs included charges for the closing of two plants which were closed in the six months ended October 31, 2004. Included in total restructuring costs in the six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 are non-cash impairment charges of $0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

SG&A decreased 5% from $10.6 million in the six months ended October 31, 2004 to $10.1 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005 due primarily to the continuation of cost reduction initiatives.

-16-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Operating loss improved $1.6 million from a loss of $3.9 million in the six months ended October 31, 2004 to a loss of $2.3 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005. This improvement is the result of the increased sales price realization and cost reduction initiatives.

International

Net sales in the International segment increased by $3.4 million, or 5%, to $76.1 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005 compared to $72.7 million in the six months ended October 31, 2004 due to a 17% increase in converting volumes and a 1% increase in converting sales price (excluding the effects of foreign currency exchange rates), which more than offset a 1% mill volume decrease.

Cost of sales in the International segment was $62.7 million the six months ended October 31, 2005 as compared to $57.0 million for the six months ended October 31, 2004, an increase of $5.7 million, or 10%. Excluding the effects of foreign currency exchange rates, this increase is the result of an 8% overall increase in freight costs and an 18% increase in energy costs. Approximately 50% of the energy cost increase is attributable to a malfunction of the turbine at San Andrés and is in the process of being repaired.

SG&A in the International segment decreased 18%, or $1.2 million, in the six months ended October 31, 2005 when compared to the six months ended October 31, 2004. This improvement is primarily the result of the recovery of bad debts that had been written off in prior periods.

Operating income for the International segment was $7.6 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005, 13% lower than the $8.7 million for the six months ended October 31, 2004. This decrease in operating income is primarily the result of the increased energy and freight costs offset by converting volume and overall sales price increases.

Corporate

Unallocated corporate expense increased by $0.8 million to $8.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006. This increase is primarily the result of increased professional fees.

Other (Expense)/Income

Interest expense increased from $12.4 million in the six months ended October 31, 2004 to $12.9 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005, primarily due to higher interest rates on our variable rate debt. Average outstanding borrowings decreased from $262.7 million during the period ended October 31, 2004 to $259.9 million during the period ended October 31, 2005.

Excluding Interest expense, Other income - net decreased from income of $1.4 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005 to income of $0.6 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005. This decrease in Other Income is primarily due to unfavorable swings in foreign currency exchange rates.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

In determining our consolidated tax rate, we compute an annual effective rate for each taxable jurisdiction.

During the six months ended October 31, 2005, we recorded a net increase to our valuation allowance of $292. An increase of $582, related to the expected non-realization of certain net operating losses in the State of Ohio, was recorded along with an additional increase of $743 for net operating losses which are expected to expire unused. These increases were offset by non-expiring state tax credits of $1,033 which, based on initial tax planning strategies, are expected to be realized. However, we continually evaluate and modify strategies and the ultimate form of utilization of these tax credits may change.

Also during this period, we repatriated approximately $612 in dividends from our European subsidiary. Taxes for this repatriation were provided for at April 30, 2005 and this transaction reduced our deferred tax asset for the net operating loss by approximately $216.

-17-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Net Income

In summary, our net income, which decreased from income of $2.0 million in the six months ended October 31, 2004 to a net loss of $2.6 million in the six months ended October 31, 2005, was adversely affected by the continued increase in worldwide energy and freight costs which more than offset the realization of previously announced price increases.

Three Months Ended October 31, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended October 31, 2004

Overview

Net Sales. Net sales for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 were $217.9 million, $0.8 million greater than $217.1 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2004. This increase is predominantly the result of the realization of prior announced price increases in our North American segments and an 18% increase in foreign converting sales volume.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 increased 3% to $193.9 million from $189.0 million during the quarter ended October 31, 2004. This increase was driven by increases in both energy and freight costs, which increased 32% and 10%, or $5.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively, which more than offset a 9% decline in overall recovered paper costs.

SG&A. SG&A decreased 4% in the quarter ended October 31, 2005 to $19.9 million as compared to $20.6 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2004. This improvement resulted from the collection of certain debts that had been deemed uncollectible in our International segment and a lower provision for bad debts in our North American segments, as well as our continued focus on cost containment.

Restructuring and Impairments. We recorded restructuring charges of $0.4 million during the quarter ended October 31, 2005 as compared to $0.1 million during the quarter ended October 31, 2004. Current quarter expenses include on-going costs related to previously shut down operations in our Converted Products and Paperboard segments as well as new charges for the announced upcoming closure of the Natick, MA plant. Current restructuring costs include non-cash impairment on the assets of the Natick, MA mill of $0.1 million.

Operating Income. Operating income was 49% lower during the quarter ended October 31, 2005 as compared to the quarter ended October 31, 2004. Current quarter Operating income was $3.7 million compared to $7.3 in the same quarter last year. This decrease is mainly the result of the increased energy and freight costs which more than offset the realization of previously announced price increases and the reduction in the cost of recovered paper.

Paperboard

Net sales in the Paperboard segment decreased 1%, or $1.6 million, in the quarter ended October 31, 2005 when compared to the quarter ended October 31, 2004, the result of a 1% decrease in volume.

Overall cost of sales increased $2.3 million, or 2%, from $96.4 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2004 to $98.7 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2005. Energy and freight cost escalation are primarily responsible for the growth in cost of sales, 30% or $5.2 million, and 11% or $1.9 million, respectively, when compared to the quarter ended October 31, 2004. These increases were offset by a 9% decline in the overall cost of recovered paper costs.

Restructuring costs were $0.4 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2005 compared to ($0.1) million during the quarter ended October 31, 2004. The charges incurred during the current quarter represent continued costs to exit previously shut down locations as well as new charges for the announced upcoming closure of the Natick, MA plant, and include $0.1 million of non-cash impairment on fixed assets.

Our mill utilization rates declined to 94% during the quarter ended October 31, 2005 as compared to 95% in the quarter ended October 31, 2004. This decrease is the result of the hurricanes that plagued the Gulf Coast this three-month period causing a loss of 16 machine days at our Mobile, AL mill.

SG&A decreased 3% from $8.5 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2004 to $8.2 million in the quarter ended October 31, 2005 primarily due to a decrease in the provision for bad debts.

Operating income for the Paperboard segment decreased 47%, from $8.7 million to $4.7 million, in the quarters ended October 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, primarily due to the increased energy and freight costs referred to above which was partially offset by the decrease in overall recovered paper costs.

-18-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Converted Products

Net sales in the Converted Products segment ~~were~~decreased ~~2%, or~~ $13.6 million, ~~higher~~or ~~when~~5%, ~~comparing~~in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 to $74.4 million from $78.0 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004.~~ ~~This~~2007 ~~improvement is mainly~~ due to ~~a 6~~13% ~~increase~~lower involumes ~~sales~~more ~~price~~than ~~for~~offsetting ~~our converted products, realized from previously announced price increases, offset by~~ a 5 9% ~~decrease~~increase in ~~volume~~average sales price.

Cost of sales ~~increased~~for 1%the quarter ended July 31, or2008 was $068.59 million, toa decrease of $642.6 million, ~~when~~or ~~comparing the quarters ended October 31~~4%, ~~2005~~compared to ~~and 2004~~$71.5 ~~This increase~~million isin ~~partly~~ the ~~result~~same quarter of ~~two~~the ~~additional~~prior ~~months~~year. ofLower ~~operation~~costs atdue ~~our~~to ~~NSP~~decreased ~~start-up~~volumes ~~facility~~more ~~which~~than ~~began~~offset ~~production~~per-ton inincreases ~~October~~of ~~2004,~~$15 asand ~~well~~$13 asin ~~increased~~freight ~~costs~~and ofraw ~~chemicals~~material ~~and~~paperboard ~~packaging~~costs, ~~supplies~~respectively.

~~Restructuring~~The ~~costs~~Converted ~~were~~Products ~~$0.1~~segment ~~million~~incurred inno ~~the~~restructuring ~~quarter~~charges ~~ended~~in ~~October 31,~~either ~~2005,~~of ~~a $0.1 million decrease from $0.2 million in~~ the ~~quarter~~quarters ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004.~~2008 ~~Expenses~~or ~~in each of these quarters represent on-going charges relating to prior closures~~2007.

SG&A expenses decreased ~~6% from~~ $50.43 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~2008 to $4.8 million from $5.01 million in the same quarter ~~ended~~of ~~October 31~~the prior year, ~~2005~~ due ~~primarily~~ to ~~cost~~lower compensation ~~reduction~~costs ~~initiatives~~on reduced headcount.

~~Operating~~The ~~loss for the~~ Converted Products segment ~~improved~~posted operating income of $10.68 million ~~when~~in ~~comparing~~ the ~~quarters~~current ~~ended October 31~~quarter, ~~2005~~a ~~and~~decrease ~~2004,~~of ~~respectively~~$0.6 million, ~~from~~or ~~$2.3~~43%, ~~million~~compared to $01.74 million. ~~This~~in ~~improvement~~the isquarter ~~the~~ended ~~result~~July 31, of2007 ~~the~~due ~~realization~~to oflower ~~previously~~volumes ~~announced~~and ~~price increases~~higher asper-ton ~~well~~freight asand ~~continued~~raw ~~cost~~material ~~reduction~~paperboard ~~initiatives~~costs more than offsetting increased prices and lower SG&A costs.

International

Net sales in the International segment ~~improved~~ were $56.2% million, oran increase of $06.86 million, or 13%, compared to $3649.96 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2007. ~~compared~~The higher sales total is attributable to ~~$36~~sales price increases of 13% and 9% on our international converted and mill products, respectively, along with a 5% increase in converting operations volume.1 ~~million~~Overall mill volumes were 30% higher in the ~~same~~current quarter ~~last~~compared to the prior year’s ~~primarily~~quarter, ~~due~~though toexcluding anthe ~~18%~~German ~~increase~~mill inthat ~~converting~~was acquired at the beginning of the second quarter of 2008, mill volumes were slightly down. The ~~converting~~weakening ~~volume~~of ~~increase~~the US dollar against the Euro also factored into increased sales, as the average US dollar/Euro exchange rate during the current quarter was ~~offset~~1.56 bycompared to 1.36 in the quarter ended July 31, 2007, a 315% ~~decrease~~change. inExcluding the effects of foreign currency exchange rates, our average mill and converting sales ~~price,~~prices ~~primarily~~decreased ~~due~~6% toand ~~product~~2%, ~~mix~~respectively.

Cost of sales in the International segment was $3048.65 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008, asan increase of $6.1 million, or 15%, compared to $2842.14 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004,~~2007 andue ~~increase~~to ofa ~~$2.5~~32% rise ~~million,~~in orenergy ~~9%.~~costs ~~This~~per ~~increase~~ton isof ~~the~~paperboard ~~result~~produced ofalong with a 229% increase in ~~energy~~the ~~costs,~~cost ~~60%~~ of ~~which~~ isrecovered ~~attributable~~paper toper ~~the~~ton ~~turbine~~of ~~malfunction~~paperboard atproduced. ~~San~~Higher ~~Andrés,~~volumes asalso ~~well~~contributed asto ~~21%~~the ~~and~~overall ~~14% increases in board and freight costs, respectively~~increase.

SG&A in the International segment ~~showed~~increased a $01.74 million, ~~or 22%, improvement~~ in the current quarter ~~ended~~to ~~October 31,~~$5.1 ~~2005~~million ~~when~~from ~~compared~~$3.7 tomillion in the quarter ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2004,~~2007. orThe increase ~~$2.5~~is ~~million~~equally ~~compared~~attributable to ~~$3.2~~additional ~~million,~~expenses ~~respectively.~~from ~~This~~the ~~improvement~~acquired isGerman ~~primarily~~mill, the ~~result~~weaker ofUS ~~the~~dollar ~~recovery~~versus ofthe ~~bad~~Euro ~~debts~~and ~~that~~additional ~~had~~costs ~~been~~allocated ~~written~~from ~~off~~the incorporate ~~prior periods~~office.

Operating income ~~for~~in the International segment was $32.85 million infor the quarter ended ~~October~~ July 31, ~~2005,~~2008 ~~21%~~compared ~~lower~~to ~~than the~~ $43.85 million ~~reported~~ in the ~~quarter~~same ~~ended~~period ~~October 31,~~of ~~2004~~the prior year. ~~This~~Although ~~decrease~~average insales ~~operating~~prices ~~income~~and isvolumes increased, ~~the~~higher ~~result~~per-ton ofenergy ~~the~~and ~~increased~~recovered ~~energy~~paper costs, ~~freight~~along ~~and~~with ~~board~~additional costs ~~discussed~~attributable ~~above~~to the German mill acquired in the second quarter of 2008, more than offset those improvements.

Corporate

Unallocated corporate expense ~~remained~~for ~~constant~~the atquarter ended July 31, 2008 decreased 35% to $42.09 million ~~for~~from ~~each~~$4.4 ofmillion in the ~~quarters~~quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2007. The decrease is due to a reduction in our reserve for bad debts, lower professional fees and ~~2004.~~reductions in various other corporate expenses.

Other (Expense)/ Income

Interest expense ~~increased from $6.2 million in~~ for the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~2008 to was $6.67 million, ina decrease of $0.2 million compared to the ~~quarter~~same ~~ended~~period ~~October 31,~~of ~~2005,~~the ~~primarily~~prior year mainly due to ~~higher~~lower ~~interest~~ rates on our variable -rate debt. Average outstanding borrowings ~~decreased~~during ~~$3.2~~the ~~million~~quarter ended July 31, ~~from~~2008 were $~~265~~304.93 million compared to $~~262~~289.76 million for the quarter ended July 31, 2007.

Excluding ~~Interest~~interest expense, Other income - —net decreased from ~~income of~~ $01.56 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~2007 to ~~income of~~ $0.49 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008. ~~This~~The ~~decrease~~difference inis ~~Other~~essentially ~~Income~~the isresult ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~$0.8 tomillion ~~unfavorable~~of ~~swings~~interest received in ~~foreign~~the ~~currency~~prior ~~exchange~~year’s quarter ~~rates~~as part of a state sales-tax related settlement.

-19 21 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Income Tax Expense (Benefit) ~~Expense~~

InOur ~~determining our~~ consolidated tax rate, weis ~~compute~~computed using an annual effective rate for each taxable jurisdiction. We record income tax expense related to foreign jurisdictions in which we have taxable income and for certain state jurisdictions. When comparing the three months ended July 31, 2008 and 2007, the European effective rate decreased from 36% to 30% primarily due to the drop in the Spanish statutory tax rate from 32.5% to 30%. Pre-tax income from foreign jurisdictions has decreased approximately $1.0 million to $1.3 million when comparing these two periods and income tax expense has decreased approximately $0.5 million. We do not provide for US federal income taxes due to our previous recording of a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets – net operating losses.

During the quarter ended October 31, 2005, we recorded a $0.3 million net reduction to our valuation allowance. An increase in the allowance of $0.7 million, for net operating losses expected to expire unused, was offset by non-expiring state tax credits of $1.0 million which, based on initial tax planning strategies, are expected to be realized. However, we continually evaluate and modify strategies and the ultimate form of utilization of these tax credits may change.

Additionally during this quarter, we repatriated approximately $0.6 million as dividends from our European subsidiary. Taxes for this repatriation were provided for at April 30, 2005 and this transaction reduced our deferred tax asset for the net operating loss by approximately $0.2 million.

Net Income

In summary, ~~our~~we ~~net~~recorded ~~income~~a ~~decreased~~net ~~from~~loss ~~income~~ of $113.23 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004~~2008 toas acompared to net ~~loss~~income of $14.29 million in the quarter ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~ 2007. ~~Net~~Higher ~~income~~energy ~~was~~and ~~adversely~~wastepaper ~~affected by~~costs ~~the~~in ~~continued~~both ~~increase~~our indomestic ~~energy~~and international mills, lower North American volumes and ~~freight~~increased restructuring and impairment costs. more than offset realized sales price increases across all segments

Liquidity Requirements

Operations. Our current cash requirements for operations consist primarily of expenditures to maintain our mills and plants, purchase inventory, meet operating lease obligations, meet obligations to our lenders, and finance working capital requirements ~~and~~as ~~other~~well as other operating activities. We fund our current cash requirements with cash provided by operations and borrowings under our ~~senior~~asset-based and credit-linked ~~facility~~facilities. We believe that these sources ~~are~~will be sufficient to meet the current and anticipated cash requirements of our operations for the next twelve months.

AsCapital ~~discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April~~Expenditures. ~~30,~~Our ~~2005,~~total ~~we have~~capital ~~provided~~expenditures ~~income~~were ~~taxes of~~ $25.30 million ~~for~~and ~~the repatriation of~~ $65.4 1 million ~~of foreign earnings~~ in the ~~form~~quarters ~~of dividends. During the six months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005,~~2008 weand ~~repatriated a total of $7.3 million~~2007, ~~only $0~~respectively.6 ~~million~~We ofexpect ~~which~~fiscal ~~was in~~2009 ~~the~~capital ~~form~~expenditures ofto abe ~~dividend and therefore taxable in the United States. This transaction reduced our deferred tax asset for the net operating loss by~~ approximately $015.20 million.

Capital Expenditures. Our total capital expenditures were $8.9 million and $9.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively of which $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, were spent on the Fitchburg mill. Through October 31, 2005, we have made capital expenditures of approximately $177.2 million on the Fitchburg mill. We expect our total fiscal 2006 capital expenditures to be under $25.0 million.

Borrowings

At ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008, total debt (consisting of current maturities of debt, our ~~senior~~asset-based ~~credit~~and ~~facility~~credit-linked facilities, and other long-term debt, as reported on our condensed consolidated balance sheets) was as follows (in millions):

	October 31, 2005
	July 31,2008
Senior revolving credit facility(1)	$	7.8
9.75 % Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014	$	175.0
9 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014		175.0
Asset-based credit facility		39.8
Industrial Revenue Bonds		69.3
Term loan		15.0
Other(2)		10.4
Industrial Revenue Bonds (“IRBs”)		63.5
Total debt	$	262.5
Other (1)		15.3
Total debt	$	308.6

(1) ~~Excludes~~See ~~letters~~Note of5 ~~credit~~to ~~issued~~the toaccompanying ~~enhance~~condensed ~~security~~consolidated financial statements for the ~~IRBs~~components ~~and~~of ~~workers’~~this ~~compensation claims~~total.

~~(2)~~In ~~Pursuant to the~~ July 52007, ~~2005~~our ~~“put”~~international ofsubsidiary ~~Company~~entered ~~common~~into ~~stock to the Company by its former Chairman and current Director (see Note 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements), the Company issued~~ a ~~subordinated~~new ~~note~~five-year onloan ~~August 10, 2005 for $7.9 million to the former Chairman~~ in ~~exchange for~~ the ~~198,000~~amount ~~shares~~ of ~~Company~~€5.0 ~~common~~million. ~~stock~~Borrowings ~~owned~~under bythis ~~him.~~loan ~~The~~bear ~~note~~a ~~bears~~variable interest ~~at the prime~~ rate of inEURIBOR ~~effect~~plus ~~from~~0.75%. ~~time~~Principal ~~to time, requires quarterly principal~~ and interest payments ~~and~~are isrequired ~~due~~every insix ~~July~~months ~~2015.~~at Aswhich ofpoint ~~October 31, 2005,~~ the ~~remaining~~variable ~~balance~~interest onrate ~~the note~~ is $6reset.9 ~~million.~~

On March 9, 2007, (i) we entered into a five-20year asset-based senior secured revolving credit facility whereby the lenders agreed to provide to us a revolving line of credit in the aggregate principal amount of up to $85.0 million (depending on our borrowing base), up to $25.0 million of which may be used for loans directly to our International subsidiary and up to $15.0 million of which may be used for letters of credit, and other financial accommodations, and (ii) we and our domestic subsidiaries entered into a six-year credit-linked facility whereby the credit-linked lenders provided to us a $15.0 million term loan and a $75.0 million credit-linked letter of credit facility, and other financial accommodations. The credit-linked facility was amended on August 12, 2008. Under the agreement referred to in (i) above, we (a) granted the lenders a first priority lien on all of our accounts receivable and inventory (the “ABL Priority Collateral”) and a second priority lien on substantially all of our other assets, including certain

- 22 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

In real ~~March~~property, ~~2004~~and (b) guaranteed the obligations, under this facility, of an international subsidiary. Under the agreement referred to in (ii) above, we ~~entered~~granted ~~into~~the lenders a ~~three-year,~~first ~~senior~~priority ~~secured~~lien ~~revolving~~on ~~credit~~substantially ~~facility~~all ~~with~~of ~~Wachovia~~our ~~Bank~~assets, ~~National~~including ~~Association~~certain real property (excluding accounts receivable and inventory), asand ~~Agent. The~~a ~~facility~~second ispriority inlien to the ~~aggregate~~lenders ~~principal~~on ~~amount~~all ofABL ~~$150~~Priority Collateral.0 ~~million,~~Borrowings ~~with~~under upthe toasset-based ~~$95.0~~facility ~~million~~bear ~~available~~interest ~~for~~at ~~the~~a ~~issuance~~rate of ~~letters~~prime ofor ~~credit.~~the ~~Letters~~Eurodollar ofrate plus a credit ~~are~~spread ~~issued,~~determined inbased ~~part,~~on asavailability ~~security~~under ~~for~~the ~~our~~facility. ~~industrial~~Pursuant ~~revenue~~to ~~bonds.~~the Asamendment ofto the credit-linked facility dated ~~October~~August 3112, ~~2005~~2008 (see Note 15 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements), wethe ~~had~~term ~~approximately~~loan ~~$82.8~~bears ~~million~~interest ofat ~~letters~~a rate of ~~credit~~prime ~~outstanding~~plus to5.5% ~~secure~~or ~~our~~the ~~industrial~~Eurodollar ~~revenue~~rate ~~bonds~~plus ~~and~~a ~~liability~~credit ~~insurance~~spread ~~claims~~of ~~and $7~~6.85%. ~~million~~Letters of ~~other~~Credit ~~borrowings~~are ~~outstanding~~issued under the credit-linked facility, ~~leaving~~primarily usto enhance the Company’s multiple IRB issues with ~~availability~~ ofthe ~~approximately~~credit ~~$59.4~~spread ~~million~~being ~~under~~the same as the ~~revolver~~term loan.

~~Our~~The ~~senior~~asset-based ~~secured~~and ~~revolving~~credit-linked facilities include financial covenants as follows: (a) if, during any quarter, Excess Availability, as defined under the credit ~~facility~~facilities, ~~requires~~falls ~~that~~below we$10.0 ~~satisfy~~million, ~~certain~~the ~~financial~~Company ~~covenants~~must achieve a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined, of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. and (b) the Senior Leverage Ratio, as defined and as amended in the credit-linked facility ~~agreement.~~on ~~These~~August 12, ~~covenants~~2008, ~~consist~~for each twelve-month period ending as of aneach ~~interest~~of ~~coverage~~the ~~test~~following fiscal quarter ends shall be less than or equal to 4.75 to 1.0 at July 31, a2008, ~~$30~~4.50 to 1.0 ~~million~~at ~~maximum~~October 31, ~~level~~2008, of3.50 ~~annual~~to ~~capital~~1.0 ~~expenditures~~ at January 31, 2009 and ~~certain~~3.0 ~~leverage~~to ~~ratios~~1.0 Asat ofApril 30, ~~October~~2009 and thereafter. At July 31, ~~2005~~2008, wethe ~~were~~Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.

~~Effective~~In ~~May 1,~~March ~~2006~~2004, ~~pursuant~~we tocompleted ~~the~~an ~~senior~~offering ~~secured~~of ~~revolving~~$175.0 ~~credit~~million ~~facility,~~of ~~our~~9.75% ~~current~~senior ~~interest~~subordinated ~~coverage~~notes ~~test~~(the ~~will~~“Notes”) ~~increase~~with ~~from~~a maturity ~~the~~date ~~ratio~~ of 2March 12, 2014.~~0:1~~ toWe apay ~~ratio~~interest semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of 2each year.~~25:1.~~ ~~This~~We ~~will~~cannot ~~require~~redeem the Notes before March 15, 2009; on ~~each measurement~~or after that date, ~~that~~we may redeem them at specified prices. The Notes rank junior in right of payment to all of our ~~Adjusted~~existing ~~EBITDA,~~and asfuture ~~defined~~senior debt and equal in ~~the~~right ~~credit~~of ~~facility~~payment ~~agreement,~~with beall ~~greater~~of ~~than~~our 2existing and future senior subordinated debt.25 ~~times~~The Notes are not guaranteed by any of our ~~cash~~subsidiaries, ~~interest~~and ~~expense~~therefore are effectively subordinated to all liabilities of our subsidiaries. AtIf ~~October 31,~~we ~~2005~~experience certain changes of control, ~~our~~we ~~actual~~must ~~interest~~offer ~~coverage~~to ~~ratio~~purchase ~~was~~the 2Notes at 101% of their face amount, plus accrued interest.~~1:1.~~

In March 2004, we completed an offering of $175.0 million of 9.75% senior subordinated notes with a maturity date of March 12, 2014. We pay interest semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year. We cannot redeem the Notes before March 15, 2009, except as described below. On or after that date, we may redeem them at specified prices. However, on or before March 15, 2007, we may redeem up to 35% of the original principal amount of the Notes at 109.75% of their face amount, plus accrued interest, with money we raise from certain public equity offerings. The Notes rank junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt and equal in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior subordinated debt. The Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries, and therefore, are effectively subordinated to all liabilities of our subsidiaries. If we experience certain changes of control, we must offer to purchase the Notes at 101% of their face amount, plus accrued interest.

We are also parties to a series of cross-currency rate swap transactions with members of our existing bank group (the “2001 Swaps”). The 2001 Swaps have been designated as hedges against the existing inter-company loan to our European subsidiary. At October 31, 2005 the fair value of the 2001 Swaps represented a liability of $14.7 million.

Additionally, in our effort to manage costs, we have entered into several energy price hedges. At October 31, 2005 the fair value of these hedges was an asset of $6.3 million.

Aggregate annual principal payments applicable to debt for the next five years and thereafter will be as follows (in millions):

Year Ending April 30,	Total
2006 (1)	$	1.0
2009 (1)	$	6.8
2007 (2)		12.4
2010 (2)		15.0
2008		2.9
2011		4.8
2009		2.9
2012 (3)		44.8
2010		3.0
2013		4.1
Thereafter		~~240~~233.31

(1) Represents remaining obligations for the fiscal year ended April 30, ~~2006~~2009 and includes $4.7 million due under the term loan.

(2) Includes $710.83 million due under ~~revolving~~the ~~credit~~term ~~facility~~loan.

(3)	Includes $39.8 million due under the asset-based credit facility.

We are party to a series of cross-currency interest rate swap agreements (the “2001 Swaps”) with a member of our bank group. At July 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, the fair value of the 2001 Swaps represented a liability of $13.2 million and $13.1 million, respectively. During the quarter ended July 31, 2007, we entered into another swap agreement in relation to an intercompany loan with our European subsidiary that was not designated as a hedge which represented a liability of $3.1 million and $3.6 million as of July 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively.

Additionally, in our effort to manage costs, we, at varying times, utilize energy and raw material price hedges. At July 31, 2008, the fair value of these hedges was a liability of approximately $0.9 million, which was entirely energy related. These hedges are accounted for as cash flow hedges pursuant to the appropriate accounting standards.

Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operating activities

In the ~~six~~quarter ~~months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005 and 2004~~2008, we ~~generated~~used $4.3 million of cash ~~from~~in operating activities compared ofto ~~$11.1~~generating ~~million~~cash ~~and~~from ~~$10.5~~operating ~~million,~~activities ~~respectively.~~of ~~This~~ $028.63 million ~~increase~~ in ~~cash generated from operations is mainly~~ the ~~result~~quarter ofended ~~lower accounts receivable~~July 31, ~~which was offset by higher prepaid expense and other receivable balances~~2007, asa ~~well~~change asof ~~decreased~~$32.6 ~~earnings~~million. ~~resulting~~The ~~from~~change ~~the~~was ~~higher energy and freight costs.~~

-21 23 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

primarily the result of (i) an $18.3 million decrease in net earnings, (ii) a $13.8 million change in accounts payable partly due to the change in cost of wastepaper as well as cash management strategies, (iii) the prior year receipt of $1.9 million from the surrender of a life insurance policy and (iv) $0.4 million in additional prepayments for certain insurance and maintenance costs.

Net cash used in investing activities

In the quarters ~~six months~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~2004~~2007, we used $74.98 million and $96.31 million of cash, respectively, in investing activities. The ~~overall~~change ~~reduction compared~~is toessentially ~~last~~attributable ~~year was due primarily~~ to $1.01 million ~~more~~of inadditional proceeds from the sale of ~~property,~~certain ~~plant~~water ~~and~~rights ~~equipment~~in the ascurrent ~~well as $0~~quarter.4 ~~million less of capital expenditures.~~

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

In the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008, wefinancing ~~used~~activities ~~cash~~provided in$9.3 ~~financing~~million ~~activities~~compared the use of $111.74 million ~~while~~ in the ~~six-month~~quarter ~~period~~ ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2004, financing~~2007. ~~activities~~In ~~provided~~the ~~cash~~current ofquarter, we paid $1.0.5 million. ~~This increased use~~ of ~~cash~~financing costs isrelating ~~primarily due~~ to the ~~fact~~amendment ~~that~~of inour ~~the current six~~credit-~~month~~linked ~~period,~~facility weand had net ~~repayments of~~ long-term ~~debt~~borrowings of $28.26 million as compared to the net ~~borrowings~~repayment of ~~long-term debt of~~ $121.61 million in long-term borrowings in the same ~~period~~quarter ~~last~~of ~~year.~~the ~~This~~prior ~~$14~~year.8 ~~million~~There ~~negative effect on financing cash flows~~ was ~~offset~~also by an $11.0 4 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~cash overdrafts. Additionally, there were no cash purchases of treasury stock in~~ the ~~six-month period~~change ~~ended October 31, 2005 as compared to $1.1 million of purchases~~ in ~~the~~cash ~~six-month period ended October 31, 2004~~overdrafts.

Seasonality

Certain of our products are used by customers in the packaging of food products, primarily fruits and vegetables. Due principally to the seasonal nature of certain of these products, sales of our products to these customers have varied from quarter to quarter. Natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, ice storms, wind storms, floods and other weather conditions may materially and adversely affect our business and our earnings. In addition, poor weather conditions that reduce crop yields of packaged food products and ~~adversely~~reduced ~~affect~~ customer demand for food containers can adversely affect our revenues and our operating results. The sales volumes of certain of our converted products can also vary from quarter to quarter, partly due to the increased production of textbooks and binders before the beginning of the school year, as well as the production of board games and other products before the start of the Christmas season. Our overall level of sales and operating profit have historically been lower in our third quarter, ended January 31, due in part to the cyclicality of the demand for our products as well as closures by us and our customers for the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s holidays.

Inflation

~~Changes~~Increases in raw material and energy prices have had, and continue to have, a material negative effect on our operations. We do not believe that general economic inflation is a significant determinant of our raw material price increases or that it has a material effect on our operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accompanying ~~unaudited~~ condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information, which require management to make estimates that affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported. The following are critical accounting matters which are both very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and which require some of management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. The accounting for these matters involves the making of estimates based on current facts, circumstances and assumptions which, in management’s judgment, could change in a manner that would materially affect management’s future estimates with respect to such matters and, accordingly, could cause future reported financial condition and results to differ materially from the financial condition and results reported based on management’s current estimates. Changes in these estimates are recorded when better information is known. There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies during the ~~six~~three-month period ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008.

Pension

Our defined benefit pension plans are accounted for in accordance with ~~SFAS~~FAS No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” and FAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” The determination of pension obligations and expense is dependent upon our selection of certain assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rates used to discount plan liabilities, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the ~~discount~~level ~~rates~~of ~~used~~compensation ~~to discount plan liabilities~~increases. Our assumptions are described in Note 1214 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, ~~2005~~2008. The assumption for the long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined based on historical results of the portfolio and management’s expectation of the current economic environment. Effective May 1, 2003, this rate of return was 8.75%. At April 30, ~~2004~~2008, the discount ~~rate was reduced from 6.50% to 6.25% and subsequently reduced to 5.70% on April 30, 2005. A 1.0% change in this discount rate would create an impact to the~~ ~~statement of operations of approximately $1.0 million. This discount~~ rate ~~is based upon the demographics of the plan participants as well as benchmarking certain indices, e.g. Citigroup High Grade Credit Index as well as Aa- and Aaa-Rated Corporate Bonds. Pension expense~~ was ~~$6.2 million in 2004, $5.3 million in 2005 and is expected to be $4.8 million in 2006.~~

-22 24 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

6.55%. A 1.0% change in this discount rate would create an impact to the statement of operations of approximately $1.5 million. The discount rate is based upon the demographics of the plan participants as well as benchmarking a certain index, e.g. Citigroup Pension Liability Index. To determine our expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, we evaluate criteria such as asset allocation, historical returns by asset class, historical returns of our current pension portfolio managers and management’s expectation of the economic environment. Based upon this methodology, the expected long-term rate of return on assets was 8.8% as of April 30, 2008. A 1% change in the long-term rate of return on plan assets would create an impact to the statement of operations of approximately $1.1 million. The level of compensation increase is established by management, and has the smallest direct impact of the three assumptions on the statement of operations. A 0.5% change in this compensation rate would create an impact to the statement of operations of approximately $0.2 million. Excluding curtailment charges, pension expense was $3.0 million in 2007 and $1.9 million in 2008, and is expected to be approximately $2.3 million in 2009. We incurred curtailment expenses of $107 and $701 in 2007 and 2008, respectively.

Goodwill

~~Effective~~We ~~May 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This pronouncement requires us to~~ perform a goodwill impairment test at least annually. See Note 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, ~~2005~~2008 for additional information regarding our goodwill accounting. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on a number of factors including market conditions and operational performance of our businesses. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill associated with our businesses is impaired. Evaluating the impairment of goodwill also requires us to estimate future operating results and cash flows, which also require judgment by management. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Accounts Receivable

Our policy with respect to trade and notes receivables is to maintain an adequate allowance or reserve for doubtful accounts for estimated losses from the inability of our customers to make required payments. For specific accounts ~~for~~on which we have information that the customer may be unable to meet its financial obligation, ~~whether~~(e.g. ~~or not a~~ bankruptcy ~~is involved~~), a provision is recorded at time of occurrence. For all other accounts in our International segment, customer invoices are typically reserved once the invoice remains unpaid at 180 days past due date. For all other accounts domestically, percentages are applied to all receivables based up the age of the specific invoices. The older invoices (e.g., all amounts greater than 90 days) receive a larger percentage of allowance, based upon management’s best estimate. Another percentage, based upon management’s best estimate, is applied to the remaining receivable balance. A total reserve is calculated in this manner and is compared to historical experience. If collections were to slow by seven days, there would be an increase in this reserve of $0.25 million. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate and result in an inability for them to make their payments, additional allowances may be required.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those that relate to air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste management and disposal and site remediation. Concerning environmental claims, we record any liabilities and disclose the required information in accordance with FAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, Statement of Position 96-1, “Environmental Remediation Liabilities” and FAS 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” Additionally, from time to time, we may be identified, along with other entities, as being among parties potentially responsible for contribution to costs associated with the investigation, correction and remediation of environmental conditions at disposal sites subject to federal and/or analogous state laws. Costs associated with environmental obligations are accrued when such costs are probable and reasonably estimable. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Estimates of costs for future environmental compliance and remediation are necessarily imprecise due to such factors as the continuing evolution of environmental laws and regulatory requirements, the availability and application of technology, the identification of currently unknown remediation sites and the allocation of costs among the potentially responsible parties under applicable statutes. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are discounted to their present value when the amount and timing of expected cash payments are reliably determinable.

Income Taxes

Pursuant to FAS 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”), ~~the~~we ~~Company provides~~ provide for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred taxes are not provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are considered permanently reinvested.

In- ~~establishing~~25 ~~reserves~~- against net deferred tax assets, the Company assesses recoverability based upon a computation of normalized earnings and the resultant expected utilization of those net deferred tax assets. Under FAS 109, a valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that some portion of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization is dependant upon, among other things, the generation of future taxable income and tax management strategies.

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

We assess the need to record a valuation allowance, which is determined through the process of projecting our net deferred tax assets while factoring in tax planning strategies, based upon a computation of normalized earnings and the resultant expected utilization of those net deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that some portion of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Realization is dependent upon, among other things, the generation of future taxable income and tax management strategies. If we were to determine that we would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the net deferred tax asset would increase income.

As of April 30, 2008, we had a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets for US federal and state income tax purposes. We also have full valuation allowances against net assets of certain foreign jurisdictions. We will maintain such allowances until positive earnings are recorded in several consecutive reporting periods. We will continue to evaluate our valuation allowances on a quarterly basis.

We believe that in situations in which future realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon taxable income from future operations, FAS 109 requires the relative significance of cumulative losses to be addressed within the guidance provided in paragraphs 24 and 103. Accordingly, in assessing the realization of US jurisdiction net operating loss carry-forwards for the years ended April 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and considering future taxable income, we have identified the key elements of both positive and negative evidence and evaluated such evidence by applying the guidance provided in paragraphs 24 and 103 of FAS 109.

The Company’s policy is to consider the following sources of taxable income, which may be available under the tax laws to realize a tax benefit for deductible temporary differences and carry-forwards.

•

Future reversals of temporary differences

•

Future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carry-forwards

•

Tax planning strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented to:

o Accelerate taxable amounts to utilize expiring carry-forwards

o Change the character of taxable or deductible amounts from ordinary income

Evidence available about each of those possible sources of taxable income will vary between tax jurisdictions and possibly from year to year. To the extent evidence about one or more sources of taxable income is sufficient to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not necessary, the Company’s policy is that other sources of taxable income need not be considered. For any specific jurisdiction where a history of three years of cumulative losses has occurred, the Company does not rely on projections of taxable income.

FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: an interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (“FIN 48”) provides that the tax effects from an uncertain tax position can be recognized in the financial statements only if it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company accounts for interest costs and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

~~Pursuant~~We ~~to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we~~ periodically evaluate long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and definite lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in conditions may indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that management considers important that could initiate an impairment review include the following:

•

Significant operating losses;

•

Significant declines in demand for a product where an asset is only able to produce that product;

•

Assets that are idled; and

•

Assets that are likely to be divested.

The impairment review requires management to estimate future undiscounted cash flows associated with an asset or asset group expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. Estimating future cash flows requires management to make judgments regarding future economic conditions, product demand and pricing. Although we ~~believe our estimates are appropriate, significant differences~~ in the actual performance of the asset or asset group may materially affect our asset values and results of operations. An impairment loss shall be recognized if the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group exceeds fair value as determined by the sum of the undiscounted cash flows. For additional information, see Note 8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005.

-23 26 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~Item 3~~ believe our estimates are appropriate, significant differences in the actual performance of the asset or asset group may materially affect our asset values and results of operations. ~~Qualitative~~An ~~And~~impairment ~~Quantitative~~loss ~~Disclosure~~shall ~~About~~be ~~Market~~recognized ~~Risk~~if the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group exceeds fair value as determined by the sum of the undiscounted cash flows. For additional information, see Note 10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008.

Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and the costs of raw materials used in our production processes. To reduce such risks, we selectively use financial instruments.

The following risk management discussion and the estimated amounts generated from the sensitivity analyses are forward-looking statements of market risks, assuming that certain adverse market conditions occur. Actual results in the future may differ materially from those projected results due to actual developments in the global financial markets. The analysis used to assess and mitigate risks discussed below should not be considered projections of future events or losses.

Commodity Prices: The markets for our recovered paper products, particularly Old Corrugated Containers (“OCC”), are highly cyclical and affected by such factors as global economic conditions, demand for paper, municipal recycling programs, changes in industry production capacity and inventory levels. These factors all have a significant impact on ~~costs~~selling prices and our profitability. We estimate that a 10% increase in the ~~purchase~~ price of recovered paper ~~consumed~~, with no corresponding increase in the prices of finished products, would have approximately a ($1119.5) million negative effect on our operating income inon ~~fiscal~~an ~~2006~~annual basis, although this would be slightly mitigated by our sale of recovered paper to third party customers.

Energy prices are also highly cyclical. We estimate that a 10% increase in our energy costs with no corresponding increase in the prices of finished products would have approximately aan ($911.5)2 million negative effect on our operating income inon ~~fiscal 2006~~an annual basis. We ~~utilize derivative financial instruments in an~~ attempt to partially hedge our energy price risk onby buying forward contracts for some of our future energy requirements.

Interest Rates/Cross-Currency Interest Rate Swaps: We ~~have~~are party to a series of cross-currency interest rate swap agreements (the “2001 Swaps”) with ~~two~~a ~~banks~~member asof ~~described~~our ~~above.~~bank ~~The~~group ~~2001~~that ~~Swaps~~had ~~have~~ been designated as ~~hedges~~a cash flow hedge against ~~the~~an existing intercompany loan to our European subsidiary. Effective May 1, 2007, we de-designated the 2001 Swaps as hedges. With this de-designation, the amount in other comprehensive income, $0.2 million, is to be reclassified into earnings over the life of the original agreements, which are scheduled to terminate in September 2009. Despite this de-designation of an accounting hedge, the swaps continue to provide an economic hedge of the exposure to changes in the Euro to US dollar exchange rates. At ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008, the fair value of the 2001 Swaps represented a liability of $1413.72 million. ~~and~~During the ~~results~~quarter ofended July 31, ~~hedge~~2007, ~~ineffectiveness~~we ~~related~~entered into another swap agreement in relation to a second intercompany loan with our European subsidiary that was not designated as a hedge which represented a liability of $3.1 million as of July 31, 2008. As a result ~~these~~of ~~swap~~derivative ~~agreements~~activities during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~October~~July 31, ~~2005~~2008 and ~~2004~~2007, ~~were~~we arecognized ~~gain~~gains of $0.25 million and $0.31 million, respectively. We do not expect a material amount to be reclassified from other comprehensive income to earnings to offset recognition of gains and losses on the intercompany loan in the next twelve months.

We could be exposed to future changes in interest rates. ~~Our~~on our ~~senior~~variable-rate ~~secured~~debt, ~~revolving~~which ~~credit~~accounts ~~facility~~for ~~bears~~approximately ~~interest~~$130.7 atmillion aof ~~variable~~all ~~rate,~~outstanding asdebt doat ~~our~~July 31, ~~industrial revenue bonds~~2008. Interest rate changes impact the amount of our interest payments on this variable-rate debt and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. We estimate that if interest rates were to increase by 10% on this variable-rate debt, or approximately 50 basis points, it would have approximately a ($0.7 million negative effect on operating income on an annual basis. Additionally, as discussed in Note 15 to the attached unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, our credit-linked senior secured credit facility was amended in August 2008, resulting in increases to our credit spreads of 450 basis points and 425 basis points on prime rate and Euro dollar rate borrowings, respectively. These increases to our credit spreads will have approximately a $3).5 million negative effect on ~~net~~operating ~~earnings~~income on an annual basis.

We do not otherwise have any involvement with derivative financial instruments and do not use them for trading purposes.

Item 4(T). Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures.

~~During~~As ~~the first six months~~ of ~~fiscal 2006~~July 31, 2008, our management, including ~~the~~our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing, summarization and reporting of information in our reports that we file with the SEC. These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is made known to our management, including these officers, by other of our employees, and that this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, ~~within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and~~ forms. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Our controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.

~~Based on their evaluation as of October 31, 2005, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a~~-~~15(e)~~ ~~and~~27 ~~15d~~-~~15(e)~~ under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to reasonably ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

-24-

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Our controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.

Based on their evaluation as of July 31, 2008, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to reasonably ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

(b)	Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company continually seeks ways to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its internal controls over financial reporting, resulting in frequent process refinement. However, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal period to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~None~~We are party to various claims, legal actions, complaints and administrative proceedings, including workers’ compensation and environmental claims, arising in the ordinary course of business. Although in management’s opinion the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, in the event of one or more adverse determinations related to these issues, the impact on our results of operations could be material to any specific period.

By letters dated February 14, 2006 and June 2, 2006, the United States Environment Protection Agency (“EPA”) notified us of our ~~ITEM~~potential liability relating to the Lower Passaic River Study Area (“LPRSA”), which is part of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site, under Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. We are one of at least 70 potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) identified thus far. The EPA alleges that hazardous substances were released from our now-closed Newark, NJ paperboard mill into the Lower Passaic River. The EPA informed us that we may be potentially liable for response costs that the government may incur relating to the study of the LPRSA and for unspecified natural resource damages. The EPA demanded that we pay $2.8 ~~UNREGISTERED~~million ~~SALE~~in OFunreimbursed ~~EQUITY~~past ~~SECURITIES~~response costs ~~AND~~on ~~USE~~a OFjoint ~~PROCEEDS~~and several liability basis. Alternatively, the EPA gave us the opportunity to obtain a release from these past response costs by joining the Cooperating Parties Group (the “Group”) and agreeing to fund an environmental study by the EPA; we subsequently joined the Group. In 2006, the EPA notified the Group that the cost of the study would exceed its initial estimates and offered the Group the opportunity to conduct the study by itself rather than reimburse the government for the additional costs incurred. The Group engaged in discussions with the EPA and the Group agreed to assume responsibility for the study pursuant to an Administrative Order on Consent. Cumulatively, as of July 31, 2008 and based upon the most recent estimates for the study, we had expensed $0.8 million (none of which was expensed in the quarter ended July 31, 2008), of which $0.3 million remains accrued.

Additionally, by letter dated August 2, 2007, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) of the United States Department of Commerce sent a letter to us and other companies identified as PRPs notifying them that it intended to perform an assessment of injuries to natural resources in connection with the release of hazardous substances at or from the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site. In this letter, the NOAA invited all of the identified PRPs, including us, to participate in the development and performance of this assessment. The Group, collectively, decided not to participate. Some of the members of the Group, including us, have been seeking additional information from the NOAA to determine whether cooperation is possible and whether or not the Group should reconsider its decision not to participate.

- 28 -

THE NEWARK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Due to uncertainties inherent in these matters, management is unable to estimate our potential exposure, including possible remediation or other environmental responsibilities that may result from these matters at this time; such information is not expected to be known for a number of years. These uncertainties primarily include the completion and outcome of the environmental study and the percentage of contamination/natural resource damage, if any, ultimately determined to be attributable to us and other parties. It is possible that our ultimate liability resulting from this issue could be material.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

No material changes

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

(a) None

(b) None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

~~None~~The Annual Meeting of The Newark Group’s shareholders was held on July 28, 2008, at which time the shareholders unanimously re-elected the full, current slate of directors in its entirety.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS

~~(a)~~31.1 ~~Exhibits:~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-~~25-~~Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

- 29 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	THE NEWARK GROUP, INC.
Date: December 14, 2005
Date: September 12, 2008
	By:	/s/ Robert H. Mullen
		Robert H. Mullen
		Chief Executive Officer, President and
		Chairman of the Board
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: December 14, 2005
Date: September 12, 2008
	By:	/s/ Joseph E. Byrne
		Joseph E. Byrne
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

- 2630 -

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

7.Table COMMITMENTof AND CONTINGENCIESContents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · NEWARK GROUP, INC