UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ~~[FEE REQUIRED]~~

For the fiscal year ended: October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ~~[NO FEE REQUIRED]~~

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 0-18741

LESLIE’S POOLMART, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

95-4620298

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

3925 E. Broadway Road, Suite 100

Phoenix, Arizona 85040

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (602) 366-3999

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or Section 15(d). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, ~~(as~~or ~~defined~~a smaller business reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer,” and “smaller business reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act~~) Yes ¨ No x~~.


Large Accelerated Filer ¨		Accelerated Filer ¨		Non-Accelerated Filer x		Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS:

The ~~Number~~number of ~~Shares~~shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock outstanding as of December 15 23, ~~2004~~2009 was ~~7,369,502~~100.

LESLIE’S POOLMART, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009

		Page
~~PART I~~	PART I
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 2.	Properties	7
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	8
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	9
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	8
Item 2.	Properties	10
PART II
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	11
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	8
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	11
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	9
	PART II
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	12
Item 7a.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	19
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	13
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplemental Data	20
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure	38
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	22
Item 9a.	Controls and Procedures	38
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	23
PART III
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure	43
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	39
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	43
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	41
Item 9B.	Other Information	44
Item 12.	Principal Shareholders and Stock Ownership of Management	45
	PART III
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	46
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	45
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	47
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	48
PART IV
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	60
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K	48
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	60
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	61
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	63

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. (“Leslie’s” or the “Company”) is the leading national specialty retailer of swimming pool supplies and related products. These products primarily consist of regularly purchased, non-discretionary pool maintenance items such as chemicals, equipment, cleaning accessories and parts, and also include fun, safety and fitness-oriented recreational items. The Company currently markets its products under the trade name Leslie’s Swimming Pool Supplies through ~~474~~622 company-owned retail stores in 3635 states, ~~and through~~ mail order catalogs sent to selected pool owners nationwide., ~~The~~and ~~Company~~an ~~was~~internet ~~incorporated~~web ~~as a Delaware corporation in 1997~~store.

The Company provides its customers a comprehensive selection of high quality products, competitive every day low prices and superior customer service through knowledgeable and responsive sales personnel who offer a high level of technical assistance at convenient store locations. The typical Leslie’s store ~~contains~~is located in an area with high concentrations of swimming pools and approximates 3,~~863~~800 square feet of space,. The typical store is located either in a strip center or on a freestanding site in an area of heavy retail activity, and draws its customers primarily from an approximately ~~three~~five-mile trade area. The Company maintains a proprietary mailing list of approximately 57.8 million addresses, including ~~approximately~~over 8090% of the residential in-ground pools in the U.S. This highly focused list of target customers is central to the Company’s direct mail marketing efforts, which ~~support~~supports ~~both~~ its retail ~~store~~stores, ~~and~~ mail order operations and web store.

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Leslie’s Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) and was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1997. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 3925 E. Broadway Road, Suite 100, Phoenix, Arizona 85040, and the telephone number at that address is (602) 366-3999. Leslie’s corporate website address is www.lesliespool.com.

See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for financial information.

Swimming Pool Supply Industry

~~Regardless~~We ofmarket ~~the~~our ~~type~~products ~~or size of a swimming pool, there are numerous ongoing maintenance~~ and ~~repair~~services ~~requirements~~in ~~associated~~the ~~with~~estimated ~~pool ownership~~$5.0 Inbillion ~~order~~U.S. toswimming ~~keep a~~ pool ~~safe~~ and ~~sanitized,~~spa ~~chemical~~supply ~~treatment~~industry, iswhich ~~required~~can tobe ~~maintain~~divided ~~proper~~into ~~chemical~~four major ~~balance,~~segments: ~~particularly~~residential in-ground ~~response~~swimming ~~to variables such as pool usage~~pools, ~~precipitation~~residential ~~and~~above-ground ~~temperature.~~pools A(usually ~~swimming~~12 ~~pool~~to is24 ~~chemically~~feet ~~balanced~~in ~~when the disinfectant~~diameter), ~~pH,~~commercial ~~alkalinity,~~swimming ~~hardness~~pools and ~~dissolved~~spas ~~solids~~or ~~are~~hot ~~at the desired levels~~tubs. ~~The~~According ~~majority~~to ofmarket ~~swimming~~research ~~pool~~firm ~~owners use chlorine to disinfect their pools~~P.K. ~~When~~Data, the ~~pool~~installed isbase ~~chemically~~of ~~balanced~~residential in-ground pools, ~~problems~~above-ground ~~such~~pools asand ~~algae,~~spas ~~mineral~~ and ~~salt~~hot ~~saturation,~~tubs ~~corrosive~~in ~~water,~~the ~~staining,~~United ~~eye~~States ~~irritation~~has ~~and~~grown ~~strong~~from ~~chlorine~~just ~~smell~~under ~~are less likely to occur~~9.8 million ~~A regular testing and maintenance routine will result~~ in a ~~stable~~1995 ~~and~~to ~~more~~over ~~easily maintained pool~~14.8 million ~~However,~~in ~~regardless of how well appropriate levels of chlorine are maintained~~2008, ~~“shocking”~~and is ~~periodically~~projected ~~required~~ to ~~break~~grow upto ~~the~~over ~~contaminants which invariably build up in the pool water~~16.5 million ~~To accomplish~~by ~~this, the pool owner can either superchlorinate the pool or use a nonchlorinated oxidizing compound~~2012. ~~The~~Both ~~maintenance~~historic ~~of proper chemical balance~~ and ~~the~~new pool ~~related~~unit ~~upkeep~~growth ~~and~~is ~~repair~~highly ofcorrelated ~~swimming~~to ~~pool~~macroeconomic ~~equipment~~housing trends, ~~such~~ as ~~pumps,~~approximately ~~heaters,~~60% ~~and filters,~~of ~~create~~all ~~a non~~in-~~discretionary~~ground ~~demand for pool chemicals and other~~ swimming ~~pool~~pools ~~supplies~~are ~~and~~built ~~services. Further, non-usage considerations such~~ as apart ~~pool’s appearance and the overall look~~ of anew ~~household~~home ~~and yard create an ongoing demand for these maintenance related supplies~~construction. ~~In addition, pool usage creates demand for discretionary items such as floats, games and accessories.~~

~~The~~Regardless of the type or size of a swimming pool, ~~supply~~there ~~industry~~are ~~can~~numerous beongoing ~~divided~~maintenance ~~into~~and ~~four~~repair ~~major~~requirements ~~segments~~associated bywith pool ~~type:~~ownership. ~~residential~~In ~~in-ground~~order ~~swimming~~to ~~pools,~~keep ~~residential~~a ~~above-ground swimming~~pool ~~pools~~safe ~~(usually~~and 12sanitized, chemical treatment is required to 24maintain ~~feet~~proper chemical balance, particularly in ~~diameter)~~response to variables such as pool usage, ~~commercial~~precipitation and temperature. A swimming ~~pools~~pool is chemically balanced when the disinfectant, pH, alkalinity, hardness and ~~spas~~dissolved solids orare ~~hot~~at ~~tubs~~the desired levels. The ~~Company’s~~majority ~~historical~~of ~~strategy~~swimming ~~was~~pool owners use chlorine to ~~focus~~disinfect ~~primarily~~their onpools. When the ~~residential~~pool ~~in-ground~~is ~~pool~~chemically ~~owner.~~balanced, Inproblems ~~recent~~such ~~years~~as algae, ~~the~~mineral ~~Company~~and ~~has~~salt ~~expanded~~saturation, ~~its~~corrosive water, staining, eye irritation and ~~activities~~strong chlorine smell are less likely to ~~more~~occur. ~~aggressively~~A ~~address~~regular ~~the~~testing ~~commercial~~and maintenance routine will result in a stable and ~~above-ground~~more ~~markets~~easily asmaintained ~~well~~pool. InHowever, ~~the~~regardless ~~residential~~of ~~categories~~how well appropriate levels of chlorine are maintained, “shocking” is periodically required to break up the ~~Company~~contaminants ~~markets~~which ~~its~~invariably ~~products~~build ~~primarily~~up toin the ~~“do-it-yourself”~~pool ~~market~~water. asTo ~~opposed~~accomplish tothis, ~~those~~the pool ~~owners~~owner ~~who~~can ~~hire~~either super-chlorinate the pool ~~servicers~~ or use a nonchlorinated oxidizing compound. ~~Through~~The ~~its~~maintenance ~~commercial~~of ~~business,~~proper ~~products~~chemical balance and ~~services~~the ~~are~~related ~~offered~~upkeep toand ~~all~~repair ~~non-residential~~of swimming pool ~~installers~~equipment, such as pumps, heaters, and filters, as well as tosafety ~~pool~~equipment, ~~service~~create ~~companies~~a ~~which~~non-discretionary ~~maintain~~demand ~~either~~for ~~residential~~pool orchemicals ~~commercial~~and ~~pools~~other swimming pool supplies and services. Further,

Seasonality

The Company’s business exhibits substantial seasonality, which the Company believes is typical of the swimming pool supply industry. In general, sales and net income are highest during the quarters ended June and September which represent the peak months of swimming pool use. Sales are substantially lower during the quarters ended December and March when the Company typically incurs net losses. The principal external factor affecting the Company’s business is weather. Hot weather and the higher frequency of pool usage in such weather create a need for more pool chemicals and supplies. Unseasonably early or late warming trends can increase or decrease the length of the pool season. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and/or extraordinary amounts of rainfall in the peak season will tend to decrease swimming pool use. The likelihood that unusual weather patterns will severely impact the Company’s results is lessened by the

~~geographical~~ non-usage ~~diversification~~considerations ofsuch ~~the~~as ~~Company~~a pool’s ~~store~~appearance ~~locations.~~and ~~The Company also expects that its quarterly results of operations will fluctuate depending on~~ the ~~timing~~overall ~~and~~look ~~amount~~ of ~~revenue~~a ~~contributed~~household ~~by new stores~~ and, toyard acreate ~~lesser~~an ~~degree,~~ongoing ~~the~~demand ~~timing~~for ofthese ~~costs~~maintenance ~~associated~~related ~~with the opening of new stores~~supplies. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~addition, ~~attempts~~pool ~~to open its new stores primarily in the~~usage ~~quarter~~creates ~~ending~~demand ~~March~~for indiscretionary ~~order~~items tosuch ~~position~~as ~~itself~~floats, ~~for~~games ~~the~~and ~~following peak season~~accessories.

The Company’s historical strategy has been to focus primarily on the residential in-ground pool owner. In recent years, the Company has expanded its activities to more aggressively address the commercial, above-ground and spa markets as well. In the residential categories, the Company markets its products primarily to the “do-it-yourself” market as opposed to those pool owners who hire pool servicers. Through its commercial business, products and services are offered to commercial property managers, non-residential pool installers, as well as to pool service companies which maintain either residential or commercial pools.

Seasonality

The Company’s business exhibits substantial seasonality, which the Company believes is typical of the swimming pool supply industry. In general, sales and net income are highest during the quarters ended June and September that represent the peak months of swimming pool use. Sales are substantially lower during the quarters ended December and March when the Company typically incurs net losses. The principal external factor affecting the Company’s business is weather. Hot weather and the higher frequency of pool usage in such weather create a need for more pool chemicals and supplies. Unseasonably early or late warming trends can increase or decrease the length of the pool season. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and/or extraordinary amounts of rainfall in the peak season will tend to decrease swimming pool use. The likelihood that unusual weather patterns will severely impact the Company’s results is lessened by the geographical diversification of the Company’s store locations.

The Company also expects that its quarterly results of operations will fluctuate depending on the timing and amount of revenue contributed by new stores and, to a lesser degree, the timing of costs associated with the opening of new stores. The Company attempts to open its new stores primarily in the quarter ending March in order to position itself for the following peak season.

Products

Leslie’s offers its customers a comprehensive selection of products necessary to satisfy their swimming pool supply needs. During ~~2004~~2009, the Company stocked approximately 1,700 items in each store, with more than 30,000 additional items available through its other channels of distribution and special order processes. In ~~2004~~2009, approximately ~~420~~ 800 items were displayed in the Company’s residential mail order catalogs, approximately 2,400 items were offered through the Company’s web store and 1,~~800~~200 items were in the commercial catalog, although special order procedures make nearly all Leslie’s products available to ~~mail~~these ~~order~~ customers as well. In fiscal year 2009, Leslie’s brand name products accounted for 53% of the Company’s total sales.

The Company’s major product categories are pool chemicals; major equipment; cleaning and testing equipment; safety equipment; pool covers, reels, and liners; above-ground pools in a limited number of stores; and recreational items (which include swimming pool floats, games, lounges, masks, fins, snorkels and other “impulse purchase” items).

Non-discretionary and regularly consumed products such as pool chemicals, major equipment and parts represented ~~approximately 82~~85% of total sales in fiscal ~~2004~~ year 2009. The Company’s non-discretionary products typically have long shelf lives and are generally not prone to either obsolescence or shrinkage which could occur from changing technology or consumer buying patterns.

The Company believes that product quality and availability are key attributes considered by consumers when shopping for pool supplies and that the Company’s ability to provide a high quality, in-stock product offering is fundamental to its concept of value leadership. In addition to third-party brand names, Leslie’s carries a broad selection of products under the Leslie’s brand name. The Company believes that the Leslie’s brand name is one of the three most recognized brands in pool supplies and represents an image of quality to consumers. In fiscal 2004, Leslie’s brand name products accounted for approximately 37% of the Company’s total sales.

Channels of Distribution

Retail Store Operations. At the end of fiscal ~~2004~~year 2009, Leslie’s marketed its products through ~~474~~622 retail stores in 3635 states under the trade name Leslie’s Swimming Pool Supplies. California represents its single largest concentration of stores with 109, while 83 stores are located in Texas, and 96 stores are in the northeast/mid-Atlantic area. Leslie’s retail stores are located in areas with high concentrations of swimming pools and typically are approximately 3,900 square feet in size. In addition to the store manager, the typical Leslie’s store employs one assistant manager, who is generally a full-time employee. Additionally, Leslie’s makes frequent use of part-time and temporary employees to support its full-time employees during peak seasons. During 2004, the Company had 31 district managers, each of whom was responsible for approximately 14 stores.

~~Mail~~4 Order Catalog. Leslie’s mail order catalogs provide an extension of its service philosophies and products to those areas not currently served by a retail store and allow the scope of the Company’s business to be truly nationwide. The Company believes that its mail order catalogs build awareness of the Leslie’s name, provide it with buying efficiencies and, when coupled with information from its retail stores, are instrumental in determining site selection for new stores.

concentration of stores with 137 stores, while 112 stores are located in Texas, and over 110 stores are in the northeast/mid-Atlantic states. Leslie’s retail stores are located in areas with high concentrations of swimming pools and typically are approximately 3,800 square feet in size. In addition to the store manager, the typical Leslie’s store employs one assistant manager, who is generally a full-time employee. Additionally, Leslie’s makes frequent use of part-time and temporary employees to support its full-time employees during peak seasons. During 2009, the Company had 6 regional vice presidents and 41 district managers. Each district manager was responsible for approximately 15 stores.

Mail Order Catalog and Internet Web Store. Leslie’s mail order catalogs provide an extension of its service philosophies and products to those areas not currently served by a retail store and allow the scope of the Company’s business to be truly nationwide. The Company also operates a web store (www.lesliespool.com) providing online customers with thousands of products available for ordering and important information on pool cleaning, equipment, sanitation, and safety advice. The virtual store allows customers an opportunity to shop online and the ability to retrieve relevant information, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Company believes that its mail order catalogs and web store build awareness of the Leslie’s name, provide it with buying and direct marketing efficiencies and, when coupled with information from its retail stores, are instrumental in determining site selection for new stores.

Customer Service

Due to the complicated nature of pool chemistry and equipment maintenance and consistent with its philosophy of being a full service swimming pool supply retailer, Leslie’s offers a high level of technical assistance to support its customers. The Company considers its training of store personnel to be an integral part of its service philosophy. Leslie’s extensive training program for all full-time and part-time store employees includes courses in water chemistry, water testing, trouble shooting on equipment, equipment sizing and parts replacement.

A significant number of Leslie’s stores are supported by the Leslie’s Service Department, which offers poolside equipment installation and repair, leak detection and repair, and seasonal opening and closing services. The Service Department utilizes both Company employees and subcontractors to perform these services.

Marketing

The majority of the Company’s marketing is done on a direct mail basis through its proprietary mailing list of approximately 5.7 .8 million addresses at which, primarily, residential pools are located. Leslie’s has found that its ability to mail directly to this highly ~~focused~~targeted group is an effective and efficient way to conduct its marketing activities to both retail store and mail order customers. The Company constantly updates its address list through proprietary research techniques and in-store customer sign-ups.

Addresses on the Company’s proprietary list that are located within a specified service area of a retail store receive circulars once or twice per month from late March or early April through September or, selectively, through October. As a regular part of Leslie’s promotional activities, each mailer highlights specific items which are intended to increase store traffic, and reinforces to the customer the advantages of shopping at Leslie’s, which include everyday low pricing, knowledgeable employees, a high level of customer service, and a broad selection of high quality products. Addresses outside the Company’s store service areas, and recently active mail order customers within those service areas, receive the Company’s mail order catalogs. The Company also markets through online channels using its proprietary database, search engines and other online media. The Company utilizes local print media when it enters a new market, and does so regularly in connection with its above-ground pool sales markets. New store openings typically involve additional advertising in the first two to three months of operation.

Purchasing

Leslie’s management believes that because it is one of the largest purchasers of swimming pool supplies for retail sales in the United States, the Company is able to obtain very favorable pricing on its purchases from outside suppliers. Nearly all raw materials and those products not repackaged by the Company are purchased directly from manufacturers. It is common in the swimming pool supply industry for certain manufacturers to offer extended dating terms on certain products to quantity purchasers such as Leslie’s. These dating terms are typically available to the Company for pre-season or early season purchases.

The Company’s principal chemical raw materials and granular chlorine compounds are purchased primarily from three suppliers. At the end of fiscal 1997, the Company entered into a multi-year product purchase agreement with a major producer of one of the principal chlorine compounds, the chlorinated isocyanurates. The Company believes there are several other reliable suppliers of chlorine products in the marketplace today. Although the Company has one sole source supplier for a nonchlorine shocking compound, the Company believes that termination of supply would not pose any significant problems because substitute chemicals and alternate shocking techniques are available. The Company believes that reliable alternative sources of supply are available for all of its raw materials and finished products.

Vertical Integration

Leslie’s operates a plant in the Los Angeles area where it converts dry granular chlorine into tablet form and repackages a variety of bulk chemicals into various sized containers suitable for retail sales. Leslie’s also formulates a variety of specialty liquids, including water clarifiers, tile cleaners, algaecides and stain preventives. The chemicals the Company processes have a relatively long shelf life. Leslie’s believes that supplying its stores with chemicals from its own repackaging plant provides it with cost savings, as well as greater control over product availability and quality, as compared to non-integrated pool supply retailers. It also offers the Company greater flexibility of product sourcing and acquiring vital information when negotiating with third-party repackagers and chemical providers. The Leslie’s brand name appears on all products processed at its repackaging plant, and on the majority of all its chemical products. The Company believes it is among the largest processors of chlorine products for the swimming pool supply industry.

In connection with the operation of its three distribution centers outside of California, the Company has expanded its use of third-party chemical repackagers and its purchase of products already in end-use configurations. These products are also generally packaged under the Leslie’s brand name. The Company continually evaluates the cost effectiveness of third-party sourcing versus internal manufacturing in order to minimize its cost of goods. During 2003, the Company expanded its packaging operation of specialty items to its Hebron, Kentucky distribution facility. In addition to chemicals, a variety of the Company’s other products are packaged under the Leslie’s brand name.

Purchasing

Leslie’s management believes that because it is one of the largest purchasers of swimming pool supplies for retail sales in the United States, the Company is able to obtain very favorable pricing on its purchases from outside suppliers. Most raw materials and those products not repackaged by the Company are purchased directly from manufacturers. It is common in the swimming pool supply industry for certain manufacturers to offer extended dating terms on certain products to quantity purchasers such as Leslie’s. These dating terms are typically available to the Company for pre-season or early season purchases.

The Company’s principal chemical raw materials and granular chlorine compounds are purchased primarily from three suppliers. At the beginning of the 2009 fiscal year, the Company extended a multi-year product purchase agreement with a major producer of one of the principal chlorine compounds, the chlorinated isocyanurates. The Company believes there are several other reliable suppliers of chlorine products in the marketplace today and termination of supply would not pose any significant problems because substitute chemicals and alternate shocking techniques are available. The Company believes that reliable alternative sources of supply are available for all of its raw materials and finished products.

Vertical Integration

Leslie’s operates a plant in Ontario, California where it converts dry granular chlorine into tablet form and repackages a variety of bulk chemicals into various sized containers suitable for retail sales. Leslie’s also formulates a variety of specialty liquids, including water clarifiers, tile cleaners, algaecides and stain preventives. The chemicals the Company processes have a relatively long shelf life. Leslie’s believes that supplying its stores with chemicals from its own repackaging plant provides it with cost savings, as well as greater control over product availability and quality, as compared to non-integrated pool supply retailers. It also offers the Company greater flexibility of product sourcing and vital information when negotiating with third-party repackagers and chemical providers. The Leslie’s branded product names appear on all products processed at its repackaging plant, and on the majority of its chemical products. The Company believes it is among the largest processors of chlorine products for the swimming pool supply industry.

In connection with the operation of its four distribution centers outside of California, the Company has expanded its use of third-party chemical repackagers and its purchase of products already in end-use configurations. These products are also generally packaged under the Leslie’s brand name. The Company continually evaluates the cost effectiveness of third-party sourcing versus internal manufacturing in order to minimize its cost of goods. The Company also operates a packaging operation of specialty items at its Hebron, Kentucky distribution facility. In addition to chemicals, a variety of the Company’s other products are packaged under the Leslie’s brand name.

Distribution

In ~~2004~~2009, the Company distributed ~~all of~~ its products to its retail stores and to its catalog customers through its leased distribution facilities in Ontario, California; Dallas, Texas; Swedesboro, New Jersey; ~~and~~ Hebron, Kentucky; and Orlando, Florida.

The Company purchases the majority of the chemicals to be distributed from the Dallas, Swedesboro and Hebron distribution centers from outside manufacturers rather than obtaining them through its repackaging facility in Southern California. During the height of its seasonal activities, each of the Company’s retail ~~stores~~store’s inventory is generally replenished every 5 to 7 days.

The Company utilizes a variety of leased and owned equipment, supplemented by additional equipment leased during the busy season, to transport its goods to stores.

Competition

~~Primary~~Competition ~~elements~~within ofthe ~~competition~~pool insupply ~~the~~industry ~~retail~~is ~~swimming~~highly ~~pool~~fragmented ~~supply~~and ~~industry are~~largely ~~price,~~populated ~~technical~~by ~~assistance,~~local ~~customer~~“mom ~~service,~~and ~~product~~pop” ~~selection~~stores and ~~product~~regional ~~availability~~chains. ~~Most~~Based on the number of stores, the Company’s ~~competition~~estimates that ~~comes~~the ~~from~~next ~~local~~largest ~~stores~~specialty orpool ~~regional~~supply ~~chains~~retailer ~~which~~is doless ~~not~~than ~~repackage~~one-third orof ~~manufacture~~its ~~products~~size. Mass merchant and ~~which~~home ~~generally~~improvement ~~buy products~~chains participate in ~~smaller~~the ~~quantities~~category on a seasonal basis. ~~The~~While ~~chain~~the ~~store~~ability ~~competitors~~of ~~include~~these amerchants ~~large~~to ~~franchise~~accept ~~operator~~low margins on the limited number of ~~approximately~~items ~~140~~they ~~retail~~offer ~~outlets~~makes inthem aggressive price competitors of the ~~Florida~~Company, ~~market~~they are not generally priced significantly below Leslie’s and ado ~~limited~~not ~~number~~offer the level of ~~other~~customer ~~retail~~service ~~chains~~or wide selection of ~~approximately~~swimming 15pool tosupplies available 30at ~~stores~~Leslie’s.

The Company competes on selected principal products such as chlorine with large volume, mass merchant and home center retailers. While the ability of these merchants to accept low margins on the limited number of items they offer makes them aggressive price competitors of the Company, they are not generally priced significantly below Leslie’s and do not offer the level of customer service or wide selection of swimming pool supplies available at Leslie’s.

Employees

As of October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, Leslie’s employed 1approximately 2,~~892~~280 persons. During the height of the Company’s seasonal activities in ~~2004~~2009, it employed 2approximately 3,~~696~~ 100 persons, including seasonal and part-time store employees who generally are not employed during the off season. The Company is not subject to any collective bargaining agreements and believes its ~~relationships~~overall relationship with its employees ~~are~~is good.

Trademarks

In the course of its business, Leslie’s employs various trademarks, trade names and service marks as well as its logo in packaging and advertising its products. The Company has registered trademarks and trade names for several of its major products on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Company distinguishes the products produced in its chemical repackaging operation or by third party repackagers at its direction through the use of the Leslie’s brand name and logo and the trademarks and trade names of the individual items, none of which is patented, licensed, or otherwise restricted to or by the Company. The Company believes the strength of its trademarks and trade names has been beneficial to its business and intends to continue to protect and promote its trademarks in appropriate circumstances.

6Environmental Compliance

In the course of its business, Leslie’s operates chemical repackaging facilities and stores chemicals in our retail stores and distribution facilities. Because some of the chemicals we repackage and store are flammable or combustible compounds, we must comply with various regulations under federal, state and local environmental, health, transportation and safety requirements. Leslie’s believes that its internal training curriculum and compliance programs ensure that its employees follow the applicable operating procedures and regulations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Certain factors that may affect our business and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements include the following:

A small group of stockholders in the holding company are able to exercise control over our business.

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings. The principal stockholders of Holdings are GCP California Fund, L.P. (“GCP”) and additional affiliates of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. (“LGP”). Through their ownership or control of over 75% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, these stockholders have the power to elect a majority of the Leslie’s Board of Directors. Accordingly, those stockholders have the power to approve all amendments to the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to effect fundamental corporate transactions such as mergers, asset sales and public offerings.

Our continued success depends on our successful expansion in new and existing markets.

The Company’s continued growth depends to a significant degree on its ability to open new stores in existing and new markets and to operate these stores on a profitable basis. To a lesser extent, the Company’s

continued growth depends on increasing comparable store sales. The Company opened 36 net new stores in 2007, 27 net new stores in 2008 and 18 net new stores in 2009. We cannot assure that we will be able to open new stores in a timely manner; hire, train and integrate employees; continue locating and obtaining favorable store sites; and adapt distribution, management information and other operating systems to the extent necessary to grow in a successful and profitable manner. Further, we cannot assure that the Company’s new stores will achieve historical levels of sales or profitability. Because the Company’s new stores generally have lower operating margins following their opening than mature stores, the opening of a large number of stores could have an adverse effect on total operating margins. Additionally, the Company’s expansion plans could be adversely affected by a significant downturn in the economy and resulting decrease in new home and swimming pool construction. We expect that the Company’s quarterly results of operations will fluctuate depending on the timing and the amount of revenue contributed by new stores and, to a lesser degree, the timing of costs associated with the opening of new stores.

Our business is highly seasonal and results of operations fluctuate as a result of weather conditions.

Our business exhibits substantial seasonality which we believe is typical of the swimming pool supply industry. In general, sales and earnings are highest during the quarters ending in June and September, which represent the peak months of swimming pool use. Typically, all of the Company’s operating income is generated in these two quarters which offsets the operating losses incurred in each of the other two quarters. Our business is significantly affected by weather patterns. For example, unseasonably late warming trends can decrease the length of the pool season, and unseasonably cool weather and/or extraordinary amounts of rainfall in the peak season may decrease swimming pool use, resulting in lower maintenance needs and decreased sales.

We may not be able to successfully compete with large volume mass merchants.

Most of the Company’s competition comes from local stores or regional chains which do not typically repackage products and which generally buy products in smaller quantities. The chain store competitors include a large franchise operator of approximately 200 retail outlets in the Florida market and a limited number of other retail chains of approximately 15 to 30 stores. We compete on selected principal products with large-volume mass merchants and home centers which offer a limited selection of pool supplies as compared to us. Should mass merchants increase the breadth of their pool related product offerings, it would likely have an adverse effect on our business. There are no proprietary technologies or other significant barriers to prevent other firms from entering the swimming pool supply retail market in the future. Competition could adversely impact the Company’s sales and operating margins.

Our business may be adversely affected by an economic downturn.

Consumer demand for swimming pool related products may decline if discretionary spending declines as a result of a downturn in the economy. While spending for maintenance, repairs and replacement by existing pool owners must occur to maintain existing swimming pools, a portion of the Company’s growth depends on the continued expansion of the installed swimming pool base, which may be considered a discretionary expenditure and could be negatively affected by a difficult economy.

Our business includes the packaging and storage of chemicals and an accident related to those chemicals could subject us to liability and increased costs.

We operate chemical repackaging facilities in Ontario, California and Hebron, Kentucky and we store chemicals in our retail stores and in distribution facilities in Ontario, California; Dallas, Texas; Swedesboro, New Jersey; Orlando, Florida; and Hebron, Kentucky. Because some of the chemicals we repackage and store are flammable or combustible compounds, we must comply with various fire and safety ordinances. However, a release at a retail store or a fire at one of the Company’s facilities could give rise to liability claims against us. In addition, if an incident involves a repackaging or distribution facility, we might be required temporarily to use

alternate sources of supply that could increase the Company’s cost of sales. We believe that we maintain adequate insurance coverage. However, due to changes in the insurance industry that have led to higher costs, we can not guarantee that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance at reasonable rates or that the Company’s insurance coverage will be adequate to cover future claims that may arise.

Our business is subject to compliance with environmental, health, transportation and safety regulations.

We are subject to various regulations under federal, state and local environmental, health, transportation and safety requirements. These regulations govern the storage and sale of pool chemicals, as well as packaging, labeling, handling, and transportation of those products. Failure to comply with these laws may result in the assessment of civil and criminal penalties. Compliance with such laws in the future may be costly, as the trend in such regulations has been increasingly restrictive on activities that impact the environment.

We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of their services could adversely affect us.

We believe that the Company’s success is largely dependent upon the abilities and experience of its senior management team. The loss of services of one or more of these senior executives could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, the Company operated ~~474~~622 stores in 3635 states. The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s stores:

State		Number ofStores
Alabama		56
Arizona		4069
Arkansas		12
California		~~109~~137
Colorado		1
Connecticut		9
Delaware		2
Florida		3266
Georgia		1826
Illinois		6
Indiana		68
Iowa		1
Kansas		13
Kentucky		4
Louisiana		67
Maryland		56
Massachusetts		97
Michigan		7
Mississippi		1
Missouri		89
Nebraska		1
Nevada		1417
New Hampshire		2
New Jersey		22
New Mexico		2
New York		2122
North Carolina		46
Ohio		1013
Oklahoma		79
Pennsylvania		1819
Rhode Island		1
South Carolina		35
Tennessee		7
Texas		83112
Utah		1
Virginia		7
Total Stores		~~474~~622

Except for 2625 owned stores, the Company has leases on the remaining retail stores with lease terms expiring between ~~2004~~2009 and ~~2013~~2020. The Company’s typical lease term is five years, and in ~~the~~many ~~majority of~~ instances, the Company has renewal options at increased rents. ~~Five~~ Three leases provide for rent contingent on sales exceeding specific amounts. No other leases require payment ofbased on a percentage rent.

The Company’s corporate office is located in Phoenix, Arizona. The 3854,000 square foot office ~~building~~space ~~was~~is leased ~~for five years and had one five-year renewal option. During 2002, the Company renegotiated its existing lease adding approximately 16,000 square feet of space. The new lease extends the maturity~~ until June ~~2009, and has one five-year renewal option~~2014.

~~The Company’s Southern California distribution center is located in a 183,000 square foot facility Ontario, California. The Ontario facility was leased for~~ 10 years, expiring in 2007 and the lease has two five-year renewal options. The Company’s distribution facility in Dallas, Texas contains 100,000 square feet of space. The lease of this facility expires in 2005. The 119,000 square foot distribution facility in Bridgeport, New Jersey is leased for a 10-year term, expiring in 2008. The lease includes options to renew for two five-year periods. The 146,000 square foot distribution center in Covington, Kentucky was leased for a 12 year term and provides for two five-year renewal options.

The Company’s Southern California distribution center is located in a 183,000 square foot facility in Ontario, California. The Ontario facility is leased, expiring in 2014 and the lease has one five-year renewal option.

The Company’s distribution facility in Dallas, Texas contains 126,000 square feet of space. The lease of this facility was renewed in 2005 and is scheduled to expire in 2015, with one five-year option thereafter. The 130,500 square foot distribution facility in Swedesboro, New Jersey is leased for a 5-year term, expiring in 2013. The lease includes options to renew for two five-year periods. The 146,000 square foot distribution center in Hebron, Kentucky is leased for a 12-year term, expiring in 2010 and provides for three five-year renewal options. The 20,500 square foot distribution center in Orlando, Florida is leased for a 5-year term and expires in 2009. The Company will not be exercising its renewal option at this location and has instead entered into an 8 year lease in a nearby 30,300 square foot facility. The lease expires in 2017 and includes options to renew for two five-year periods thereafter.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is routinely involved in legal proceedings involving claims related to the ordinary course of its business;. ~~however,~~While wethe ~~are~~outcome ~~currently~~of ~~not~~any ~~party~~litigation tois ~~any~~inherently ~~material~~unpredictable, ~~legal~~the ~~proceedings.~~Company ~~Management~~ does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any ~~current~~of ~~legal~~these ~~proceedings~~matters will have a material adverse ~~effect~~impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company is currently not party to any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, ~~AND~~ RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

~~There~~The isCompany nobecame ~~public~~a ~~trading~~subsidiary ~~market~~of ~~for~~Holdings ~~the~~during February 2007, pursuant to a tax-free reorganization in which the Company’s ~~common~~shareholders ~~stock.~~became ~~There~~shareholders ~~are~~of 11Holdings ~~holders~~in the same proportions (the “2007 Reorganization”). As a result of the ~~Company’s~~2007 Reorganization, each share of outstanding common stock. ~~The~~of the Company ~~has~~was ~~not~~converted ~~paid any~~into ~~dividends~~one onshare ~~its~~ of common stock of Holdings, and ~~does~~each ~~not~~share ~~anticipate~~of ~~doing~~outstanding so10% insenior redeemable exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of the ~~foreseeable~~Company ~~future~~was converted into one share of 10% senior redeemable exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of Holdings with the same rights, privileges, and preferences, including as to liquidation.

~~Recent~~There ~~Sales~~is no public trading market for the Company’s common stock. As of ~~Unregistered~~December 23, ~~Securities~~2009, all common stock was owned by Holdings.

WeOn ~~have~~July 16, ~~not~~2007, ~~made~~the Company’s ~~any~~board ~~sales~~of directors declared a cash dividend of ~~unregistered~~$15.0 ~~securities~~million ~~during~~on the ~~past~~Company’s ~~three~~common ~~years~~stock, par value $0.001 per share, to Holdings as its sole common stockholder of record on that date, in an aggregate amount. The cash dividend was paid on August 1, 2007. On January 28, 2008, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $7.5 million on the Company’s common stock which was paid on February 1, 2008. On July 30, 2008, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $8.8 million on the Company’s common stock which was paid on August 1, 2008. On January 29, 2009, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $3.9 million on the Company’s common stock which was paid on February 2, 2009. On July 29, 2009, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $5.5 million on the Company’s common stock which was paid on August 3, 2009. The payment of dividends is restricted, but not prohibited, by the agreements and instruments governing the Company’s indebtedness. The Company contemplates that dividends may be declared in future periods based upon the liquidity position of the Company.

8Equity Compensation Plan Information:

Holdings, the parent of the Company, has reserved 1.3 million shares of nonvoting common stock for issuance under its 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and reserved an additional 1.0 million shares of nonvoting common stock for issuance in November 2007. As of October 3, 2009, there were 834 thousand equity awards outstanding under the 2005 Plan, of which the majority were issued to employees of the Company.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected consolidated financial data of the Company as of and for the fiscal years ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, September 27, ~~2003~~2008, September 28 29, ~~2002~~ 2007, September 2930, ~~2001~~2006 and ~~September 30~~October 1, ~~2000~~2005. The fiscal year ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~ 2009 consists of 53 weeks, and all other fiscal years presented consist of 52 weeks. This financial data was derived from the audited historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” ~~included elsewhere in this Annual Report~~.

	Fiscal Years Ended
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands,)	October 2,2004			September 27,2003			September 28,2002			September 29,2001			September 30,2000
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)	October 3,2009			September 27,2008			September 29,2007			September 30,2006			October 1,2005
Operating Results:
Sales	$	~~356~~509,~~041~~642		$	~~327~~488,~~165~~818		$	~~313~~468,~~311~~882		$	~~301~~440,~~700~~565		$	~~303~~388,~~163~~506
Gross Profit		172,113			155,946			146,971			135,298			131,195
Gross profit		210,173			193,091			179,880			166,109			139,944
Gross Margin (1)		48.3	%		47.7	%		46.9	%		44.8	%		43.3	%
Gross margin		41.2	%		39.5	%		38.4	%		37.7	%		36.0	%
Loss on Disposition of Fixed Assets		440			497			1,332			919			1,477
Loss on disposition of fixed assets		626			385			186			600			703
Depreciation and Amortization		10,628			9,586			9,044			8,623			8,579
Depreciation and amortization		13,183			12,385			12,619			11,789			11,881
Income from Operations(1)		34,232			27,656			20,073			15,559			6,479
Operating income(1)		87,803			79,461			69,673			56,800			23,905
Interest Expense, net		7,172			9,566			10,690			12,320			12,536
Interest expense, net		13,804			13,058			14,712			19,397			18,834
Net Income/(Loss) (1)		16,246			10,343			4,693			1,218			(4,713	)
Net income (loss)(1)		46,234			40,476			32,226			20,505			(4,422	)
Balance Sheet Data:
Working Capital		33,354			15,410			34,634			28,548			31,257
Working capital		108,818			84,459			66,657			43,213			23,657
Total Assets		142,592			128,936			141,764			132,310			137,577
Total assets		258,262			232,993			199,639			178,727			142,405
Long-term Debt		59,495			59,495			90,000			90,867			90,988
Long-term debt(2)		163,243			167,000			169,080			168,946			175,954
Preferred Stock		46,316			45,915			45,517			42,314			37,526
Redeemable preferred stock(2)		—			—			—			41,000			41,000
Stockholders’ Deficit		(39,091	)		(48,177	)		(52,899	)		(52,284	)		(47,764	)
Stockholder’s equity (deficit)(2)		8,653			(28,358	)		(52,611	)		(122,224	)		(142,557	)
Selected Operating Data:
Capital Expenditures		9,286			8,107			8,040			7,371			9,129
Capital expenditures		20,411			17,070			13,122			11,180			12,305
Unusual and Restructuring Charges(1,2)		—			—			1,500			1,466			3,173
Recapitalization and restructuring charges(1,3)		—			—			—			—			26,869
Adjusted EBITDA(1,2)		44,860			37,242			30,617			25,648			18,655
Adjusted EBITDA(1,3)		101,789			92,308			82,788			69,189			54,477
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1,3)		12.6	%		11.4	%		9.8	%		8.5	%		6.1	%
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1,2,4)		20.0	%		18.9	%		17.7	%		15.7	%		14.0	%
Cash flow from Operating Activities		19,745			32,236			20,205			15,149			11,723
Cash flow from operating activities		65,413			41,128			46,321			55,058			26,747
Cash flow used in Investing Activities		(8,668	)		(8,098	)		(8,020	)		(7,233	)		(8,656	)
Cash flow used in investing activities		(503	)		(36,831	)		(12,626	)		(10,950	)		(12,168	)
Cash flow used in Financing Activities		(260	)		(32,112	)		(957	)		(6,400	)		(3,432	)
Cash flow used in financing activities(1)		(13,577	)		(18,480	)		(12,918	)		(7,276	)		(29,174	)
Number of Employees		1,892			2,006			1,843			1,805			1,813
Number of employees		2,268			2,289			2,235			2,201			2,026
Number of Stores		474			437			410			391			383
Number of stores		622			604			577			541			541
Comparable Store Sales Growth(4)		3.3	%		2.3	%		1.9	%		(0.8	)%		3.8	%
Comparable store sales growth(5)		1.3	%		1.7	%		3.1	%		9.2	%		6.4	%

(1) During ~~the~~2005 ~~second~~and ~~quarter~~as part of ~~2002,~~ the ~~Company~~2005 ~~recorded~~Recapitalization andescribed ~~unusual~~in ~~charge~~Note ~~of $~~1.5 million for expenses associated with defending a purported class action lawsuit that was settled. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2001 for expenses associated with the relocation of its corporate office to ~~Phoenix, Arizona. In~~ the ~~fourth~~consolidated ~~quarter~~financial ~~of 2000~~statements, the Company recognized ~~an unusual charge consisting of~~ $226.19 million ~~for~~in ~~expenses~~unusual ~~principally~~charges ~~associated~~for ~~with~~the ~~its~~following ~~decision to write-off nonproductive aged inventory, $0.8 million in restructuring~~ costs ~~for expenses~~ associated with the ~~relocation of its corporate office, and an additional $0.2 million in accrued expenses for other corporate office move related expenses.~~transaction:


*(in thousands)*	2005
Unusual operating charges (included in sales, general and administrative expense):
Stock and other compensation expense	$	17,988
Other unusual operating charges (included in other expense as “Recapitalization expense”):
Bond tender consideration and premium		3,246
Preferred stock premium		470
Miscellaneous, legal and advisory fees		2,904
Unamortized discount on preferred stock		571
Write-off debt issuance costs		1,690

Total		8,881
Total unusual charges	$	26,869

(2) ~~Adjusted~~In ~~EBITDA~~the isfirst ~~defined~~quarter ~~as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, loss/(gain) on disposition~~ of ~~fixed~~2005 ~~assets, stock compensation expense, write-off of debt issuance costs~~ and ~~unusual~~as ~~charges.~~part ~~Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure~~ of ~~financial~~the ~~performance~~2005 ~~under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)~~Recapitalization, ~~but is used by some investors to determine a company’s ability to service or incur indebtedness. Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in~~ the ~~same~~Company ~~manner~~issued byan ~~all~~aggregate ~~companies and accordingly is not necessarily comparable to similarly entitled measures~~ of ~~other companies and may not be an appropriate measure for performance relative to other companies~~$170.0 ~~Adjusted~~million ~~EBITDA~~principal ~~should~~amount ~~not be construed as an indicator~~ of aits ~~company’s~~7.75% ~~operating~~Senior ~~performance~~Notes ordue ~~liquidity,~~2013. ~~and should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income (loss)~~Further, ~~cash flows from operations or cash flow data which are all prepared in accordance with GAAP~~$41.0 Wemillion ~~have~~of ~~presented Adjusted EBITDA solely as supplemental disclosure because we believe it allows for~~ a ~~more~~new ~~complete~~series ~~analysis~~ of ~~results~~10% ofsenior ~~operations.~~redeemable ~~Adjusted~~exchangeable ~~EBITDA~~cumulative ispreferred ~~not~~stock ~~intended~~was toissued ~~represent and should not be considered more meaningful than, or~~ as anpart ~~alternative to, measures~~ of ~~operating~~the ~~performance~~2005 ~~as determined in accordance with GAAP~~Recapitalization.

(3)

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, loss/(gain) on disposition of fixed assets, stock compensation expense, write-off of debt issuance costs and unusual charges. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), but is used by some investors to determine a Company’s ability to service or incur indebtedness. Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in the same manner by all companies and accordingly is not necessarily comparable to similarly entitled measures of other companies and may not be an appropriate measure for performance relative to other companies. Loss/(gain) on disposition of fixed assets and stock compensation expense are eliminated because we believe it enhances investors understanding of the company’s results, net of these non-cash charges. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an indicator of a Company’s operating performance or liquidity, and should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income (loss), cash flows from operations or cash flow data which are all prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have presented Adjusted EBITDA solely as supplemental disclosure because we believe it allows for a more complete analysis of results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent and should not be considered more meaningful than, or as an alternative to, measures of operating performance as determined in accordance with GAAP.

The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is shown as follows:

	Fiscal Years Ended
(Amounts in Thousands)	October 23, ~~2004~~2009			~~September 27, 2003~~	September 27,2008		~~September 28, 2002~~		September 29,2007	~~September 29, 2001~~		September 30,2006	~~September 30, 2000~~		October 1,2005
Net income/(loss)		16,246		$	10,343		$	4,693		$	1,218		$	(4,713	)
Net income (loss)	$	46,234			$	40,476			$	32,226		$	20,505		$	(4,422	)
Depreciation and amortization		1013,~~628~~183			~~9,586~~	12,385		~~9,044~~		12,619	~~8,623~~		11,789	~~8,579~~		11,881
Stock compensation expense		—177			—	77		—		139	—		—	~~424~~		17,988
Unusual charges		—			—			1,500			1,466			3,173
Recapitalization expenses		—				—				171			—			7,191
Interest expense, net		7,172			9,566			10,690			12,320			12,536
Gain on debt extinguishment		(357	)			(102	)			—			—			—
Write-off of debt issuance costs		—			420			—			—			—
Interest expense, net		13,804				13,058				14,712			19,397			18,834
Loss on disposition of assets		440			497			1,332			919			1,477
Write-off of debt issuance costs		—				—				—			—			1,690
Income tax expense/(benefit)		10,374			6,830			3,358			1,102			(2,821	)
Loss on disposition of assets		626				385				186			600			703
Adjusted EBITDA	$	44,860		$	37,242		$	30,617		$	25,648		$	18,655
Income tax expense		28,122				26,029				22,735			16,898			612
Adjusted EBITDA	$	101,789			$	92,308			$	82,788		$	69,189		$	54,477

(34) Adjusted EBITDA Margin represents Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of sales.

(45) The Company considers a store to be comparable in the first full month after it has completed 52 weeks of sales. Closed stores become non-comparable during their last partial month of operation. Stores that are relocated are considered comparable stores at the time the relocation is completed. Comparable store sales is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Comparable store sales is not calculated in the same manner by all companies and accordingly is not necessarily comparable to similarly entitled measures of other companies and may not be an appropriate measure for performance relative to other companies.

1014

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Certain information included in this document (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by the Company) contains statements that are forward-looking, such as statements relating to plans for future activities. Such forward-looking information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to the Company’s capital structure, weather conditions, domestic economic conditions, activities of competitors, seasonality, changes in federal or state tax laws and of the administration of such laws ~~and the general condition of the economy~~.

~~EXECUTIVE~~OVERVIEW ~~SUMMARY~~

Leslie’s is the leading national specialty retailer of swimming pool supplies and related products. The Company offers a broad range of products that consist of regularly purchased, non-discretionary pool maintenance items such as chemicals, equipment, cleaning accessories and parts, and also include fun, safety and fitness-oriented recreational items. The Company markets its products through ~~471~~622 company-owned retail stores, ~~three company-owned commercial service centers~~ in 3635 states and through catalogs and other offerings made available to select residential and commercial pool owners nationwide via mail order and ~~internet~~Internet channels.

The Company provides its customers a comprehensive selection of high quality products, competitive every day low prices and superior customer service through knowledgeable and responsive sales personnel who offer a high level of technical assistance at convenient store locations. The typical Leslie’s store ~~contains~~approximates 3,~~863~~800 square feet of space, is located either in a strip center or on a freestanding site in an area of heavy retail activity, and draws its customers primarily from an approximately ~~three~~five-mile trade area. ~~The~~Of the 622 stores, the Company operates ~~three~~20 commercial service ~~centers~~center formats that average approximately 11,000 square feet of space and are located primarily in industrial type real estate space. These centers are designed to cater to the Company’s existing non-residential commercial and service customers and provide more customized service ~~then~~than is typically available at the other retail locations. The Company also maintains a proprietary mailing list of approximately 5.8 million addresses, including approximately 80% of the residential in-ground pools in the U.S. This list of customers is central to the Company’s direct mail marketing efforts, which support both its retail store and mail order operations.

Results of Operations

As is described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company presents store occupancy costs in cost of sales and such classification is presented below for all periods.

The following table sets forth certain statements of income data expressed as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated.

	Fiscal Years Ended
	October 2, 2004		September 27, 2003		September 28, 2002
	October 3,2009		September 27,2008		September 29,2007
Sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of sales	5158.78		5260.35		5361.16
Gross margin	4841.32		4739.75		4638.94
Selling, general and administrative expense	3823.79		3923.2		3923.95
Unusual expense	—		—		0.5
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	0.1		0.1		0.0
Amortization of goodwill	—		—		0.1
Operating income	17.2		16.2		14.9
Operating income	9.6		8.5		6.4
Other expense	2.6		2.6		3.2
Other interest/income	2.1		3.2		3.8
Income tax expense	5.5		5.3		4.8
Income tax expense	2.9		2.1		1.1
Net income	9.1	%	8.3	%	6.9	%
Net income	4.6	%	3.2	%	1.5	%

11Fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008:

For the 53 weeks ended October 3, 2009, sales increased 4.3% to $509.6 million from $488.8 million in the 52 weeks of 2008. Of the 4.3% increase in sales, approximately 26% is attributable to an increase in comparable store sales and approximately 37% was due to the addition of 18 new store locations. The remaining increase is attributed to sales in the 53^rd week in 2009.

~~Fiscal~~Comparable ~~year~~store ~~2004~~sales increased 1.3% on a 52 week basis, as compared to ~~Fiscal~~the prior year. ~~2003:~~The comparable store sales increase was primarily attributable to favorable weather conditions in many of the Company’s markets. For definition purposes, a store is considered a comparable store in the first full month after it has completed 52 weeks of sales. Closed stores become non-comparable during their last partial month of operation. Stores that are relocated are considered comparable stores at the time the relocation is completed.

~~For~~Gross profit for the 53fiscal ~~weeks~~year ended October 2 3, ~~2004,~~2009 ~~sales~~improved ~~increased~~to 8$210.82 million or 41.2% of sales, as compared to $~~356~~193.01 million ~~from~~or 39.5% ~~$327~~in 2008.2 ~~million~~Gross inprofit ~~the~~represents 52sales ~~weeks~~less the cost of ~~2003~~services and purchased goods, chemical repackaging costs, related distribution costs and retail occupancy costs. ~~The~~ ~~sales~~Gross ~~increase~~profit isdollars ~~attributable~~improved by $17.1 million due to anthe increase in sales. ~~comparable~~Other ~~store~~significant ~~sales~~factors ascontributing ~~well~~to as the ~~addition~~increase ofin 38gross ~~new~~profit ~~store~~include ~~locations~~additional ~~offset~~rebates byfrom ~~the~~suppliers, ~~closing~~as ofwell ~~one~~as ~~store~~increases ~~during~~due ~~the~~to 53sales ~~weeks~~from ofhigher ~~2004~~margin products.

~~Comparable~~In ~~store~~2009, ~~sales~~total ~~increased~~operating ~~3.3%~~expenses aswere ~~compared~~$122.4 tomillion, ~~the~~versus ~~prior year~~$113.6 ~~The comparable~~million ~~store~~during ~~sales~~the ~~increase~~52 ~~was~~weeks ~~attributable~~of to2008, ~~increased marketing and merchandising efforts and~~ an increase inof ~~customer counts~~7.7%. ~~For~~Operating expenses ~~definition~~as ~~purposes,~~ a ~~store~~percentage isof ~~considered~~sales awere ~~comparable~~24.0% ~~store~~for in the ~~first~~53 ~~full~~weeks ~~month~~of ~~after~~fiscal ityear ~~has~~2009 ~~completed~~compared to 23.2% for the 52 weeks of ~~sales~~fiscal year 2008. ~~Closed~~The ~~stores~~increase ~~become~~in ~~non-comparable~~operating expense dollars during ~~their~~fiscal ~~last~~year ~~partial~~2009 ~~month~~was ofdue ~~operation.~~primarily ~~Stores~~to ~~that~~increased ~~are~~expenses associated ~~relocated~~with ~~are~~the ~~considered~~increase ~~comparable~~in ~~stores~~store atcount, ~~the~~as ~~time~~compared to the ~~relocation~~prior ~~is completed~~year.

~~Gross~~For ~~profit for~~ the fiscal year ended October 3, 22009, the ~~2004~~Company ~~improved~~recognized tolosses ~~$172.1 million~~on orthe ~~48.3%~~disposition of ~~sales,~~fixed assets totaling approximately $0.6 million as compared to $~~155~~0.94 million orin ~~47.7%~~the inprior ~~2003~~year. ~~Gross~~These ~~profit~~losses ~~represents~~were ~~sales~~primarily ~~less~~associated with the ~~cost~~Company’s ofdecision ~~services~~to ~~and~~close ~~purchased~~or ~~goods,~~relocate ~~chemical~~stores that ~~repackaging~~were ~~costs,~~unproductive ~~and~~or ~~related~~not ~~distribution~~meeting ~~costs~~expectations. ~~The~~In ~~gross~~fiscal ~~margin~~year ~~percent~~2009 ~~increase in 2004 is~~ a ~~result~~$0.1 ofmillion ~~the~~charge ~~lower~~was ~~acquisition~~recognized ~~costs~~for ~~and~~impaired ~~improved~~assets ~~distribution~~compared ~~expenses~~to asa ~~compared~~$0.4 tomillion ~~the~~charge ~~prior~~in fiscal year 2008.

InAdjusted ~~2004,~~EBITDA ~~total~~in ~~operating~~2009 ~~expenses~~increased ~~were~~10.3% to $~~137~~101.98 million, ~~versus~~from $~~128~~92.3 million in ~~2003,~~fiscal anyear ~~increase~~2008. ofApproximately 7$3.~~5%.~~7 ~~The~~million ~~increase~~of inthe ~~operating expenses in 2004 was~~increase ~~due~~was ~~primarily to~~ the ~~costs~~result ~~associated~~of ~~with~~increased ~~the~~sales, ~~increase in store count and higher insurance expenses associated~~ with ~~workers compensation and property and casualty coverage. The Company expects to be impacted by continuing increases in insurance related expenses. However,~~ the ~~Company~~remaining ~~does~~increase ~~not~~due ~~expect~~ to ~~experience~~improved ~~cost~~expense ~~increases~~control ofand ~~greater~~continued ~~proportion~~leveraging ~~than the retail industry in general. Expenses as a percent~~ of ~~sales~~fixed ~~were~~expenses ~~38.7%~~during ~~as compared to 39.2% in~~ the ~~prior~~ year.

~~For~~Operating ~~the~~income ~~fiscal~~for ~~year~~2009 ~~ended~~increased ~~October~~10.5% ~~2, 2004, the Company recognized losses on the disposition of fixed assets totaling approximately $440,000 as compared~~ to $~~497,000~~87.8 inmillion ~~the~~from ~~prior year~~$79.5 ~~These~~million ~~losses~~in ~~were~~2008 ~~primarily~~as ~~associated~~a ~~with~~result ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~previously ~~decision~~noted tosales ~~close~~and orgross ~~relocate~~profit ~~stores that were unproductive or not meeting expectations~~improvements.

~~Adjusted~~Net ~~EBITDA~~interest expense was $13.8 million in ~~2004~~2009, ~~increased~~as ~~20.5%~~compared to $4413.~~9 million~~1 ~~from $37.2~~ million in ~~the 52 weeks of 2003~~2008. ~~This~~The increase ~~was~~in ~~primarily~~net ~~the~~interest ~~result~~expense ofwas ~~increased~~due ~~sales,~~to decreased ~~improved~~interest ~~gross~~income ~~margins~~offset ~~and~~by ~~effective~~a ~~expense~~decrease ~~controls~~in ~~achieved~~average ~~during~~debt ~~the year~~balances.

~~Income~~The ~~from~~Company ~~operations~~recorded ~~for~~income ~~the~~tax ~~period~~expense ~~increased~~of 23$28.1 million in 2009, or an effective tax rate of 37.8%, toversus $3426.20 million ~~from~~ in the prior year, or an effective tax rate of 39.1%. The decrease in the effective rate is attributed to the $271.72 million benefit for a reduction in ~~2003~~estimated astaxes apayable based ~~result~~upon ofinformation received during the ~~previously~~year ~~noted~~which ~~items~~indicated that the amount would not be payable.

~~Interest~~Fiscal ~~expense~~year ~~was~~2008 ~~$7.2 million in 2004, as~~ compared to ~~$9.6 million in 2003. The decrease was primarily the result of reduced average debt balances and the reduction in the related borrowing rates during the~~ fiscal year. 2007:

~~The~~For ~~Company~~the ~~recorded~~52 ~~$420~~weeks ended September 27,~~000~~ of2008, ~~expenses~~sales inincreased ~~2003~~4.3% ~~for~~to ~~the~~$488.8 ~~write-off~~million offrom ~~debt~~$468.9 million in ~~issuance~~the ~~costs~~52 ~~associated~~weeks ~~with~~of 2007. Of the ~~refinancing~~4.3% ofincrease ~~its~~in ~~Senior~~sales, ~~Notes~~approximately ~~due~~47% ~~2004~~is ~~that~~attributable ~~was~~to ~~completed~~an increase in ~~May~~comparable store sales and approximately 53% was due to the addition of ~~2003~~27 new store locations.

~~The~~Comparable ~~Company~~store ~~recorded~~sales ~~income~~increased ~~tax~~1.7% ~~expenses~~on ofa ~~$10~~52 week basis, as compared to the prior year.4 ~~million~~The incomparable ~~2004,~~store orsales anincrease ~~effective~~was ~~tax~~primarily attributable ~~rate~~to favorable weather conditions in many of ~~39.0%~~the ~~versus~~Company’s $6markets.8 ~~million~~For definition purposes, ora anstore ~~effective~~is ~~tax~~considered ~~rate~~a ~~of 39.8%~~comparable store in the ~~prior~~first ~~year.~~full ~~The~~month ~~decrease~~after init ~~effective~~has ~~tax~~completed ~~rate~~52 isweeks ~~partially~~of ~~related~~sales. toClosed ~~the~~stores ~~benefit~~become non-comparable ~~the~~during ~~Company~~their ~~received~~last ~~related~~partial tomonth ~~the~~of ~~change~~operation. inStores ~~federal~~that ~~tax~~are ~~rate~~relocated ~~applied~~are toconsidered ~~net~~comparable ~~deferred~~stores ~~tax~~at ~~assets~~the time the relocation is completed.

~~Fiscal~~16 ~~year 2003 compared to Fiscal year 2002~~

For the 52 weeks ended September 27, 2003, sales increased 4.4% to $327.2 million from $313.3 million in the same 52 weeks of 2002. The sales increase is attributable to an increase in comparable store sales as well as the addition of 28 new store locations offset by the closing of one store during the 52 weeks of 2003.

Comparable store sales increased 2.3% as compared to the prior year. The comparable store sales increase was attributable to increased marketing and merchandising efforts and an increase in customer counts. For definition purposes, a store is considered a comparable store in the first full month after it has completed 52 weeks of sales. Closed stores become non-comparable during their last partial month of operation. Stores that are relocated are considered comparable stores at the time the relocation is completed.

~~During~~Gross profit for the fiscal ~~2003~~year ended September 27, ~~the~~2008 ~~Company~~improved ~~expanded~~to ~~its~~$193.1 ~~business~~million byor 39.5% ~~opening~~of 28sales, ~~new~~as ~~stores~~compared to $179.9 ~~Additionally~~million or 38.4% in 2007. Gross profit represents sales less the cost of services and purchased goods, ~~one~~chemical ~~store was~~repackaging ~~closed~~costs and ~~two~~related ~~were~~distribution ~~relocated~~costs. inGross ~~2003~~profit dollars improved by $10.1 ~~This~~million due ~~resulted~~to the increase in asales. ~~net~~Other significant factors contributing to the increase ofin 27gross ~~stores~~profit asinclude ofadditional ~~September~~rebates 27from suppliers, ~~2003~~as well as ~~compared~~increases due to ~~September~~sales ~~27,~~from ~~2002~~higher margin products.

~~Gross~~In ~~profit~~2008, ~~for~~total ~~the~~operating ~~fiscal~~expenses ~~year~~were ~~ended~~$113.6 ~~September 27~~million, ~~2003~~versus ~~improved to~~ $~~155~~110.92 million orduring ~~47.7%~~the 52 weeks of ~~sales~~2007, asan ~~compared~~increase toof ~~$147~~3.01%. ~~million~~Operating expenses oras ~~46.9%~~a inpercentage ~~2002. Gross~~of ~~profit~~sales ~~represents~~were ~~sales~~23.2% ~~less~~for the ~~cost~~52 weeks of ~~services~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~purchased~~2008 ~~goods,~~compared ~~chemical~~to ~~repackaging~~23.5% ~~costs,~~for ~~and~~the ~~related~~52 ~~distribution~~weeks ~~costs.~~of ~~The~~fiscal ~~gross~~year ~~margin~~2007. ~~percent~~The increase in ~~2003~~operating isexpense adollars ~~result~~during offiscal ~~the~~year ~~lower~~2008 ~~acquisition~~was ~~costs~~due ~~and~~primarily ~~lower~~to ~~distribution~~ increased expenses associated with the increase in store count, as acompared ~~percent~~to ofthe ~~sales~~prior year.

InFor ~~2003,~~the ~~total~~fiscal ~~operating expenses~~year ~~were~~ended ~~$128.3 million~~September 27, 2008, ~~versus~~the ~~$126.9~~Company ~~million~~recognized inlosses ~~2002,~~on anthe ~~increase~~disposition of ~~1.1%.~~fixed ~~The~~assets ~~increase~~totaling inapproximately ~~operating~~$0.4 ~~expenses~~million inas ~~2003~~compared ~~was due primarily~~ to ~~the~~$0.2 ~~costs~~million ~~associated~~in ~~with~~ the ~~increase~~prior inyear. ~~store~~These ~~count~~losses ~~and~~were ~~higher~~primarily ~~insurance related expenses~~ associated with ~~workers~~the ~~compensation and property and casualty coverage. The~~ Company’s ~~expects~~decision to beclose ~~impacted~~or byrelocate stores ~~continuing~~that ~~increases~~were inunproductive ~~insurance~~or ~~related expenses. However, the Company does~~ not ~~expect~~meeting toexpectations. ~~experience~~In ~~cost~~fiscal ~~increases~~year of2008 ~~greater~~a ~~proportion than the retail industry in general~~$0.4 ~~Expenses~~million ascharge awas ~~percent~~recognized offor ~~sales~~impaired ~~were~~assets ~~39.2% as~~ compared to 40a $0.5%3 inmillion ~~the~~charge ~~prior~~in fiscal year 2007.

OnAdjusted ~~September~~EBITDA ~~29,~~in ~~2002,~~2008 ~~the~~increased ~~Company~~11.5% ~~applied~~to ~~the~~$92.3 ~~new~~million ~~rules~~from on$82.8 ~~accounting~~million ~~for~~in ~~goodwill~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~other~~2007. ~~intangible~~Approximately ~~assets~~$3.5 ~~deemed~~million toof ~~have~~the ~~indefinite lives and~~increase ~~therefore there~~ was nothe ~~goodwill~~result ~~amortization~~of ~~expense~~increased ~~recorded~~sales, ~~for~~with the ~~fiscal~~remaining ~~year~~increase ~~ended~~due ~~September~~to ~~27,~~improved ~~2003~~expense ascontrol ~~compared~~and tocontinued ~~$319,000~~leveraging inof ~~the~~fixed ~~same~~expenses ~~period~~during ofthe ~~2002~~year.

~~For~~Operating ~~the~~income ~~fiscal~~for ~~year~~2008 ~~ended~~increased ~~September~~14.0% ~~27,~~to ~~2003, the Company recognized losses on the disposition of fixed assets totaling approximately~~ $~~497,000~~79.5 ~~as compared~~million tofrom $169.37 million in ~~the~~2007 ~~prior~~as ~~year.~~a ~~These~~result ~~losses~~of ~~were~~previously ~~primarily~~noted ~~associated~~sales ~~with~~and ~~the~~gross ~~Company’s~~profit ~~decision to close or relocate stores that were unproductive or not meeting expectations~~improvements.

~~Adjusted~~Net ~~EBITDA~~interest expense was $13.1 million in ~~2002~~2008, ~~increased~~as ~~21.6%~~compared to $3714.27 million ~~from~~in ~~$30~~2007.6 ~~million in~~The ~~the~~decrease ~~same~~was 52primarily ~~weeks~~due ofto ~~2002.~~the ~~This~~decrease ~~increase~~in average ~~was~~debt ~~primarily~~balances throughout the ~~result~~year ofand ~~increased~~the ~~sales,~~elimination ~~improved~~of ~~gross~~interest ~~margins~~on ~~and~~the ~~effective~~Company’s ~~expense~~preferred ~~controls~~stock, ~~achieved~~which ~~during~~was ~~the~~assumed ~~year~~by Holdings.

~~Income~~The ~~from~~Company ~~operations~~recorded ~~for~~income ~~the~~tax ~~period~~expense ~~increased~~of 37$26.80 million in 2008, or an effective tax rate of 39.1%, toversus $2722.7 million ~~from~~in ~~$20~~the prior year, or an effective tax rate of 41.14%. ~~million~~The effective rate decrease in ~~2002~~2008 aswas aprimarily ~~result~~due to nondeductibility of certain elements of the ~~previously~~ ~~noted~~Company’s ~~items~~interest expense that were present during the first four months of fiscal 2007 but were eliminated in February 2007.

Interest expense was $9.6 million in 2003, as compared to $10.7 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily the result of reduced average debt balances and the reduction in the related borrowing rates during the year.

The Company recorded no unusual expense in 2003 as compared to a $1.5 million charge in 2002 for expenses associated with defending a purported class action lawsuit that was settled.

The Company recorded $420,000 of expenses in 2003 for the write-off of debt issuance costs associated with the refinancing of its Senior Notes due 2004 that was completed in May of 2003.

The Company recorded income tax expenses of $6.8 million in 2003, or an effective tax rate of 39.8% versus $3.4 million, or an effective tax rate of 41.7% in the prior year. The effective tax rate in 2003 was lower due primarily to the fact that the permanent tax differences in 2003 were lower which had the impact of reducing the overall effective tax rate.

Risks Relating to the Company

A small group of stockholders are able to exercise control over our business.

Green Equity Investors II, L.P., through its ownership of a majority of the outstanding shares of Leslie’s common stock, together with Michael J. Fourticq, by virtue of contractual arrangements, have the power to elect a majority of our board of directors. Accordingly, Green Equity Investors and Mr. Fourticq have the power to approve all amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to effect fundamental corporate transactions such as mergers, asset sales and public offerings.

Our continued success depends on our successful expansion in new and existing markets.

Our continued growth depends to a significant degree on our ability to open new stores in existing and new markets and to operate these stores on a profitable basis. To a lesser extent, our continued growth depends on increasing comparable store sales. We opened 19 net new stores in 2002, 28 net additional retail stores in 2003 and 37 net additional stores in 2004. We cannot assure you that we will be able to open new stores in a timely manner; to hire, train and integrate employees; to continue locating and obtaining favorable store sites; and to adapt our distribution, management information and other operating systems to the extent necessary to grow in a successful and profitable manner. Further, we cannot assure you that our new stores will achieve historical levels of sales or profitability. Additionally, our expansion plans could be adversely affected by a significant downturn in the economy and resulting decrease in new home and swimming pool construction. We expect that our quarterly results of operations will fluctuate depending on the timing and the amount of revenue contributed by new stores and, to a lesser degree, the timing of costs associated with the opening of new stores.

Our results of operations fluctuate as a result of weather conditions.

Our business exhibits substantial seasonality which we believe is typical of the swimming pool supply industry. In general, sales and earnings are highest during the second and third quarters, which represent the peak months of swimming pool use. Typically, all of our operating income is generated in these two quarters which offsets the operating losses incurred in each of the other two quarters. Our business is significantly affected by weather patterns. For example, unseasonably late warming trends can decrease the length of the pool season, and unseasonably cool weather and/or extraordinary amounts of rainfall in the peak season may decrease swimming pool use, resulting in lower maintenance needs and decreased sales.

We may not be able to successfully compete.

Most of our competition comes from local stores or regional chains which, unlike us, do not repackage products and which generally buy products in smaller quantities. The chain store competitors include a large franchise operator of approximately 140 retail outlets in the Florida market and a limited number of other retail chains of approximately 15 to 30 stores. We compete on selected principal products with large-volume mass merchants and home centers which offer a limited selection of pool supplies as compared to us. There are no proprietary technologies or other significant barriers to prevent other firms from entering the swimming pool supply retail market in the future. Competition could adversely impact our sales and operating margins.

Our business includes the packaging and storage of chemicals and an accident related to those chemicals could subject us to liability and increases costs.

We operate a chemical repackaging facility in Ontario, California and store chemicals in our retail stores and in distribution facilities in Ontario, California; Dallas, Texas; Swedesboro, New Jersey and Hebron, Kentucky. Since some of the chemicals we repackage and store are flammable or combustible compounds, we must comply with various fire and safety ordinances. However, a fire at one of our facilities could give rise to liability claims against us. In addition, if an incident involves the repackaging or a distribution facility, we might be required temporarily to use alternate sources of supply which could increase our cost of sales.

We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of their services could adversely affect us.

We believe that our success is largely dependent upon the abilities and experience of our senior management team. The loss of services of one or more of these senior executives could adversely affect our results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

The following table ~~sets~~ highlights selected cash flow components for fiscal year ~~2004~~2009 and fiscal year ~~2003~~ 2008, and selected balance sheet components as of ~~October~~ 2October 3, ~~2004~~2009 and September 27, ~~2003~~2008.

	Fiscal Years Ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	October 23, ~~2004~~2009			September 27, ~~2003~~2008			~~Dollar Change~~DollarChange			~~Percent Change~~PercentChange
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	1965,~~745~~413		$	3241,~~236~~128		$	~~(12~~24,~~491~~285	)	~~(38~~59.80	)%
Investing activities		(~~8,668~~503	)		(836,~~098~~831	)		~~(570~~36,328	)	798.06
Financing activities		(~~260~~13,577	)		(3218,~~112~~430	)		314,~~852~~853		9926.23
Cash & cash equivalents	$	20,839		$	10,022		$	10,817		107.9	%
Cash and cash equivalents	$	96,981		$	45,648		$	51,333		112.5	%
Working Capital		33,354			15,410			17,944		116.4
Working capital		108,818			84,459			24,359		28.8
Other long term liabilities		145,~~673~~581			7,~~914~~556			6(1,~~759~~975	)	85(26.41	)
Senior notes, due 2008		59,495			59,495			—		—
Senior notes		163,243			167,000			(3,757	)	(2.2	)

Working capital

Working capital as of October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009 and September 27, ~~2003~~2008 consisted of the following:

	Fiscal Years Ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	October 23, ~~2004~~2009		September 27, ~~2003~~2008		~~Dollar Change~~DollarChange			~~Percent Change~~PercentChange
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2096,~~839~~981	$	1045,~~022~~648	$	1051,~~817~~333		~~107~~112.95	%
Accounts and other receivables		10,505		7,801		2,704		34.7
Short term investments		—		19,899		(19,899	)	(100.0	)
Inventories		54,765		53,030		1,735		3.3
Accounts and other receivables, net		12,688		11,796		892		7.6
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,404		1,301		103		7.9
Inventories, net		68,934		86,584		(17,650	)	(20.4	)
Deferred tax assets		6,981		6,028		953		15.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6,763		2,773		3,990		143.9
Total current assets		94,494		78,182		16,312		20.9
Deferred tax assets		4,237		4,554		(317	)	(7.0	)
Accounts payable		22,247		26,217		(3,970	)	(15.1	)
Total current assets		189,603		171,254		18,349		10.7
Accrued expenses		30,643		28,739		1,904		6.6
Accounts payable		31,307		42,117		(10,810	)	(25.7	)
Income taxes payable		8,250		7,816		434		5.6
Accrued expenses		40,515		36,981		3,534		9.6
Total current liabilities		61,140		62,772		(1,632	)	(2.6	)
Income taxes payable		8,963		7,697		1,266		16.4
Working capital	$	33,354	$	15,410	$	17,944		116.4	%
Total current liabilities		80,785		86,795		(6,010	)	(6.9	)
Working capital	$	108,818	$	84,459	$	24,359		28.8	%

From September 27, ~~2003~~2008 to October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, total current assets increased $1618.3 million from $78171.23 million to $94189.56 million. ~~The~~Approximately $51.3 million of the increase in current assets ~~resulted~~was ~~primarily~~the ~~from~~result of the increase in cash and ~~partially~~cash ~~to an increase in inventories due to the increase in store count~~equivalents.

~~Total~~From September 27, 2008 to October 3, 2009, total current liabilities decreased by $1.6.0 million from ~~October~~$86.8 2,million ~~2004 as compared~~ to ~~September~~$80.8 27million, primarily ~~2003.~~due ~~Accounts~~to ~~payables~~the ~~decreased~~decrease ~~slightly~~in asaccounts ~~compared~~payable, tooffset ~~the~~by ~~prior~~increases ~~year~~in ~~due~~accrued toexpenses ~~the~~and ~~timing~~income oftaxes ~~disbursements~~payable.

For the fiscal year ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, ~~net~~ cash provided by operating activities was $1965.74 million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $3241.21 million in the prior year. The ~~change~~increase was due primarily to the ~~increase~~decrease in ~~profitability~~inventory as compared to the prior year, ~~changes~~offset by a decrease in accounts payable ~~and~~as ~~accrued~~compared ~~expenses due~~ to the ~~timing~~prior ~~of disbursements~~year.

15In 2009, cash used in investing activities was $.5 million compared with cash used in investing activities of $36.8 million in the prior year, primarily due to the sale of short term investments in 2009.

Cash used in financing activities was $13.6 million in fiscal year 2009 compared with cash used in financing activities of $18.4 million in 2008. The decrease in financing activities was due to a decrease in the cash dividend paid to Holdings in 2009.

The Company had no outstanding borrowings under its secured loan agreement at October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008. At October 3, 2009 the Company had $75.0 million of borrowing capacity. Funds borrowed under this agreement are used primarily to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes.

From September 27, 2008 to October 3, 2009, other long term liabilities decreased by $2.0 million from $7.6 million to $5.6 million primarily due to the reduction in estimated taxes payable based upon information received during the year which indicated that the amount would not be payable.

During February of 2007, the Company’s parent, Holdings consummated a privately placed financing transaction. The Company did not guarantee or pledge support for this financing, nor were any of the proceeds made available to the Company. Holdings issued $310 million in senior notes due in 2017 and $100 million of preferred equity. The interest rate on the senior notes is 10.5% cash or 11.5% PIK, at Holdings’ option. The notes

In are ~~2004,~~non-callable ~~cash~~for ~~used~~two inyears ~~investing~~and ~~activities~~have ~~was~~other ~~$8.7~~covenants ~~million~~and asterms ~~compared~~that ~~with~~are $8customary for high yield issues.1 ~~million~~The inpreferred ~~the~~shares ~~prior~~had a dividend rate of 11% and were exchangeable into debt under ~~year~~certain circumstances. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~fiscal ~~anticipates~~2009, ~~cash~~the ~~used~~preferred inshares ~~investing~~were ~~activities~~exchanged tointo ~~increase~~junior subordinated notes with an 11% interest rate, due in ~~2005~~2019. ~~primarily~~The ~~related~~Company todoes ~~the~~not ~~opening~~expect that Holdings’ servicing of ~~additional~~its ~~stores~~debt will affect the Company’s liquidity.

Cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million in fiscal year 2004 compared with cash used in financing activities of $32.1 million in 2003. The significant decrease in financing activities was due to the early redemption of $30.5 million aggregate principle amount of Senior Notes due 2004 completed in fiscal 2003. The Company had no borrowings at year-end 2004 or 2003 under its secured loan agreement and at October 2, 2004 the Company had $35.3 million of borrowing capacity. Funds borrowed under this agreement are used primarily to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Other long term liabilities increased by $6.8 million due to the increase in accrued dividends and interest payable on the Series A Preferred Stock. During fiscal 2003, this annual cumulative dividend converted to an accrued cash dividend and is payable at the annual rate of 15.875 percent, compounded semi-annually. As of October 2, 2004, the cumulative unpaid dividend is $14.7 million as compared to $7.9 million as of September 27, 2003.

The Company believes its internally generated funds, as well as its borrowing capacity, are adequate to meet its working capital needs, maturing obligations and capital expenditure requirements, including those relating to the opening of new stores.

Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations The Company’s business exhibits substantial seasonality which the Company believes is typical of the swimming pool supply industry. In general, sales and net income are highest during the quarters ended June and September, which represent the peak months of swimming pool use. Sales are substantially lower during the quarters ended December and March when the Company will typically incur net losses. The principal external factor affecting the Company’s business is weather. Hot weather and the higher frequency of pool usage in such weather create a greater demand for more pool chemicals and supplies. Unseasonably early or late warming trends can increase or decrease the length of the pool season. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and/or extraordinary amounts of rainfall in the peak season decrease swimming pool use.

The Company’s business exhibits substantial seasonality which the Company believes is typical of the swimming pool supply industry. In general, sales and net income are highest during the quarters ended June and September, which represent the peak months of swimming pool use. Sales are substantially lower during the quarters ended December and March when the Company will typically incur net losses. The principal external factor affecting the Company’s business is weather. Hot weather and the higher frequency of pool usage in such weather create a greater demand for more pool chemicals and supplies. Unseasonably early or late warming trends can increase or decrease the length of the pool season. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and/or extraordinary amounts of rainfall in the peak season decrease swimming pool use.

The Company expects its quarterly results of operations will fluctuate depending on the timing and amount of revenue contributed by new stores and, to a lesser degree, the timing of costs associated with the opening of new stores. The Company attempts to open its new stores primarily in the quarter ending in March in order to position itself for the following peak season.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations as of October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on ~~our~~the Company’s liquidity and cash flows in future periods. This table excludes amounts already recorded on ~~our~~the Company’s balance sheet as current liabilities at October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009 and certain other purchase obligations as discussed below.

(in thousands)	Payments Due By Period
Contractual obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 years		4 – 5 years		After 5 years
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1Year		1 – 3years		3 – 5years		After 5years
Senior notes	$	59,495	$	—	$	—	$	59,495	$	—
Senior notes*	$	208,279	$	12,697	$	25,395	$	182,884	$	—
Operating leases		~~107~~139,~~413~~957		3041,~~821~~720		4662,~~428~~609		2557,~~213~~894		45,~~951~~536
Total contractual obligations	$	~~166~~348,~~908~~236	$	3054,~~821~~417	$	4688,~~428~~004	$	84240,~~708~~778	$	45,~~951~~536

16* Amounts include estimated interest and dividend payments


*(in thousands)*	Amounts of Commitment Expiration Per Period
Commercial Commitments	Total Amounts Committed		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 years		3 – 5 years		After 5 years
Standby letters of credit	$	4,298	$	4,298	$	—	$	—	$	—

Financial responsibility bonds	$	106	$	106	$	—	$	—	$	—

(in thousands)	Amounts of Commitment Expiration Per Period
Commercial Commitments	Total AmountsCommitted		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 years		4 – 5 years		After 5 years
Standby letters of credit	$	3,062	$	3,062	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financial responsibility bonds	$	227	$	106	$	121	$	—	$	—

enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Company’s purchase orders are based on the Company’s current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by the Company’s vendors with relatively short timetables. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of raw materials or finished goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed the Company’s short-term expected requirements.

Purchase orders for raw materials, finished goods and other goods and services are not included in the above table. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. For the purpose of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders are based on our current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors with relatively short timetables. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of raw materials or finished goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our short-term expected requirements.

The expected timing of payment of the obligations discussed above is estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different depending on the time of receipt of goods or services or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some obligations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to inventory reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation allowance for the net deferred income tax asset, contingencies and litigation liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, independent valuations, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue on retail sales is recognized upon purchase by the customer. Revenue on services, is recognized as services are performed and the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. Terms are customarily FOB shipping point or point of sale, net of related discounts. The Company does not provide an estimated allowance for sales returns as they are deemed to be immaterial.

Inventories ~~are stated at the lower of cost or market. The Company values inventory using the weighted average method. Included in cost of sales are the~~ costs of services and purchased goods, chemical repackaging costs and related distribution costs. The Company recognizes consideration received from vendors at the time our obligations to purchase products or perform services have been completed. These items are recorded as a reduction in cost of goods sold in the statement of operations.

17Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The Company values inventory using the weighted average cost method. Included in cost of sales are the costs of services and purchased goods, chemical repackaging costs and related distribution costs. The Company establishes a reserve for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage, which is analyzed and reviewed periodically and may require adjustments based on physical inventory counts, the relationship and fluctuation of historical product sales versus inventory on hand and changes in customer preferences. The reserve is intended to reflect the value of inventory in excess of expected realizable value.

Income Taxes

The Company records deferred tax assets or liabilities based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates and laws that will be in effect when the Company expects the differences to reverse. Effective September 30, 2007, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. The guidance establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprise’s activities during the current and preceding years. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition

threshold at the effective date to be recognized. We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within operations as income tax expense.

Due to changing tax laws and state income tax rates, judgment is required to estimate the effective tax rate expected to apply to tax differences which are expected to reverse in future periods. The Company and its subsidiaries will be included in the consolidated federal income tax return and certain state income tax returns of Holdings. The Company’s financial statements recognize the current and deferred income tax consequences that result from the Company’s activities during the current and preceding, as if the Company were a separate taxpayer rather than a member of Holding’s consolidated income tax return group.

Self Insurance

The Company retains self insurance risks for workers compensation, general liability, property and health insurance programs. The Company has limited its exposure by maintaining excess liability coverage. The Company establishes self insurance reserves based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported. The estimates are based upon information provided to the Company by the claims administrators and are periodically revised to reflect changes in loss trends.

Quarterly Financial Data

Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

( Dollar Amounts In Thousands)

2004	13 WeeksDec. 27			13 WeeksMarch 27			13 WeeksJune 26			14 WeeksOct. 2
	13 Weeks									14 Weeks
Sales	$	40,820		$	38,848		$	151,953		$	124,420
Fiscal 2009	Dec. 29			March 29			June 28			Oct. 3
Gross profit		18,430			18,699			75,223			59,761
Sales	$	60,263		$	57,008		$	213,765		$	178,606
Operating income/(loss)		(9,301	)		(9,927	)		33,778			19,682
Gross profit		15,529			17,099			99,418			78,127
Net income/(loss)		(6,879	)		(6,979	)		19,257			10,847
Operating income (loss)		(7,810	)		(6,875	)		62,191			40,297
Adjusted EBITDA(1)		(6,742	)		(7,391	)		36,383			22,610
Net income (loss)		(5,271	)		(6,329	)		35,746			22,088
Comparable store sales growth/(decline) (2)		9.3	%		4.1	%		5.7	%		(1.8	%)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)		(4,456	)		(3,599	)		65,429			44,414
Comparable store sales growth(2)		1.1	%		(0.6	)%		(1.3	)%		5.6	%
	13 Weeks Ended
2003	Dec. 28			March 29			June 28			Sept. 27
Fiscal 2008	Dec. 29			March 29			June 28			Sept. 27
Sales	$	3558,~~897~~306		$	3556,~~554~~656		$	~~139~~212,~~026~~929		$	~~116~~160,~~688~~927
Gross profit		1513,~~798~~903			16,~~310~~015			6896,~~975~~408			5466,~~863~~765
Operating income/(loss)		(10,701	)		(10,908	)		31,545			17,720
Operating income (loss)		(7,965	)		(7,179	)		59,628			34,977
Net income/(loss)		(8,128	)		(8,323	)		17,337			9,457
Net income (loss)		(6,872	)		(6,373	)		33,589			20,132
Adjusted EBITDA(1)		(84,~~427~~684	)		(83,~~623~~662	)		3362,~~904~~688			2037,~~388~~966
Comparable store sales growth/(decline) (2)		13.7	%		2.5	%		(2.9	%)		5.9	%
Comparable store sales growth(2)		8.0	%		(5.9	)%		2.1	%		1.9	%

(1) Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, loss/(gain) on disposition of fixed assets, stock compensation expense, write-off of debt issuance costs and unusual charges. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), but is used by some investors to determine a company’s ability to service or incur indebtedness. Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in the same manner by all companies and accordingly is not necessarily comparable to similarly entitled measures of other companies and may not be an appropriate measure for performance relative to other companies. Loss/(gain) on disposition of fixed assets and stock compensation expense are eliminated because we believe it enhances investors understanding of the company’s results, net of these non-cash charges. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an indicator of a company’s operating performance or liquidity, and should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income (loss), cash flows from operations or cash flow data, all of which are prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have presented Adjusted EBITDA solely as supplemental disclosure because we believe it allows for a more complete analysis of results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent and should not be considered more meaningful than, or as an alternative to, measures of operating performance as determined in accordance with GAAP.

~~(2)~~21 The Company considers a store to be comparable in the first full month after it has completed 52 weeks of sales. Closed stores become non-comparable during their last partial month of operation. Stores that are relocated are considered comparable stores at the time the relocation is completed. Comparable store sales is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Comparable store sales is not calculated in the same manner by all companies and accordingly is not necessarily comparable to similarly entitled measures of other companies and may not be an appropriate measure for performance relative to other companies.

which are prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have presented Adjusted EBITDA solely as supplemental disclosure because we believe it allows for a more complete analysis of results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent and should not be considered more meaningful than, or as an alternative to, measures of operating performance as determined in accordance with GAAP.

(2)

The Company considers a store to be comparable in the first full month after it has completed 52 weeks of sales. Closed stores become non-comparable during their last partial month of operation. Stores that are relocated are considered comparable stores at the time the relocation is completed. Comparable store sales is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Comparable store sales is not calculated in the same manner by all companies and accordingly is not necessarily comparable to similarly entitled measures of other companies and may not be an appropriate measure for performance relative to other companies.

The Company expects that the quarterly results of operations will continue to fluctuate depending on the season, weather conditions, and the timing and amount of revenue contributed by new stores. Due to the seasonal nature of the swimming pool industry, the results of any one or more quarters are not necessarily a good indication of results for an entire year, or of continuing trends.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~FASB~~In ~~Interpretation~~December ~~No. 46~~2007, ~~Consolidation~~the ofFASB ~~Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46), was~~ issued inguidance ~~January~~relating ~~2003~~to ~~and addresses consolidation by~~ business ~~enterprises~~combinations ofand ~~variable~~requires ~~interest~~the ~~entities.~~acquirer ~~FIN~~to 46recognize ~~clarifies~~the ~~existing~~assets ~~accounting for whether variable interest entities~~acquired, asthe ~~defined~~liabilities ~~in FIN 46~~assumed, ~~should~~and beany ~~consolidated~~noncontrolling interest in ~~financial statements based upon~~ the ~~investee’s~~acquiree ~~ability~~at tothe ~~finance~~acquisition ~~activities~~date, ~~without~~measured ~~additional~~at ~~financial~~their ~~support~~fair ~~and~~values ~~whether~~as ~~investors possess characteristics~~ of athat ~~controlling financial interest~~date. ~~FIN~~This 46guidance applies ~~immediately~~prospectively to ~~variable~~business ~~interest~~combinations ~~entities~~for ~~created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in~~ which anthe ~~enterprise~~acquisition ~~obtains an interest after that~~ date. ~~For~~is ~~variable~~on ~~interest entities created~~ or ~~acquired~~ after ~~January 31, 2003,~~ the ~~provision~~beginning ~~was~~of ~~to be applied for~~ the first ~~interim or~~ annual reporting period beginning on or after ~~June~~ December 15, ~~2003~~2008. InAn ~~October~~entity ~~2003,~~may ~~the~~not ~~FASB~~apply ~~delayed~~it ~~the~~before ~~effective~~that date. ofThe ~~this~~Company ~~provision~~must ~~until~~adopt ~~the~~this ~~first~~standard ~~interim~~for orits ~~annual~~2010 ~~period~~fiscal ~~ending after December 15, 2003~~year. The Company ~~does~~is ~~not~~currently ~~have~~evaluating ~~any~~the ~~variable~~impact ~~interest~~that ~~entities~~adopting ~~and therefore~~ this ~~adoption~~standard ~~did~~will ~~not~~ have ~~any effect~~ on ~~our~~its ~~results of operations or~~ consolidated financial ~~position~~statements.

In May ~~2003~~2009, ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~FASB ~~150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, was~~ issued. ~~SFAS~~general ~~150 establishes~~ standards ~~for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics~~ of ~~both~~accounting ~~liabilities and equity, and is effective~~ for ~~financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003~~ and ~~otherwise~~disclosure isof ~~effective~~subsequent ~~July 1, 2003. The Company at September 27, 2003 has~~events ~~$45.9~~that ~~million~~occur ofafter ~~mandatorily redeemable preferred stock classified as mezzanine equity on~~ the balance sheet. ~~The effect of SFAS No~~date. ~~150~~Entities ~~will~~are bealso torequired ~~reclassify this balance from the mezzanine section of the balance sheet~~ to adisclose ~~liability classification on~~ the balance sheet. In addition, the accretion of the value of the preferred stock will be classified as interest expense instead of reducing retained deficit. In October 2003, the SFAS agreed to defer the effective date ofthrough ~~Statement~~which ~~150~~subsequent ~~to entities~~events ~~that~~ have issued shares that are mandatorily redeemable on a fixed date at a fixed principal amount to fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2003. Accordingly, the Company will adopt this standard beginning October 1, 2004. Had the standard been ~~adopted~~evaluated ~~during fiscal 2004~~ and ~~2003,~~the ~~interest~~basis ~~expense~~ for ~~the~~that year ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 would have been increased by $7,160,000 and $6,191,000, respectively and preferred stock dividends and accretion in the statements of stockholders’ equity would have been reduced by the same amountdate.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial ~~ITEM~~statements 7ain accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. ~~QUANTITATIVE~~This ~~AND~~topic ~~QUALITATIVE~~is ~~DISCLOSURES~~effective ~~ABOUT~~for ~~MARKET~~interim ~~RISK~~and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009.

~~The Company’s Loan and Security Agreement described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements as well as in the Management Discussion and Analysis carries interest rate risk~~ITEM 7A. ~~Amounts~~QUANTITATIVE ~~borrowed~~AND ~~under~~QUALITATIVE ~~this~~DISCLOSURES ~~Agreement~~ABOUT ~~bear~~MARKET ~~interest~~RISK at either Libor plus 1.5%, or at the Company’s choice, the lender’s reference rate. Should the lenders’ base rate change, the Company’s interest expense will increase or decrease accordingly. No amounts are currently outstanding under this facility.

19The Company’s Amended Loan and Security Agreement described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements as well as in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, carries interest rate risk. Amounts borrowed under this agreement bear interest at either LIBOR plus a margin that is currently 3.25%, or at the Company’s choice, the lender’s base rate plus a margin that is currently 2.25%. Should the lenders’ base rate change, the Company’s interest expense will increase or decrease accordingly. As of October 3, 2009, there was no borrowing under this facility.

At October 3, 2009, our cash equivalent investments are primarily in money market accounts and are reflected as cash equivalents because all maturities are within 90 days from date of purchase. Our interest rate risk with respect to existing investments is limited due to the short-term duration of these arrangements and the yields earned, which approximate current interest rates for similar investments.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		2124
Consolidated Balance Sheets — October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003		22
Consolidated Balance Sheets—October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008		25
Consolidated Statements of Income— Fiscal Years Ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003, and September 28, 2002		23
Consolidated Statements of Operations—Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007		26
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) — Fiscal Years Ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003, and September 28, 2002		24
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit)—Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007		27
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Fiscal Years Ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003, and September 28, 2002		25
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007		28
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		2629

2023

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and ~~Stockholders~~Stockholder of Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. ~~and subsidiaries~~ as of October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009 and September 27, ~~2003~~2008 and the related consolidated statements of ~~income~~operations, ~~stockholders~~ stockholder’s equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009. These ~~consolidated~~ financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these ~~consolidated~~ financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) . Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audits~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. AnWe were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements., ~~An audit also includes~~ assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, asand ~~well as~~ evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. ~~and subsidiaries~~ at October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009 and September 27, ~~2003~~2008, and the consolidated results of ~~their~~its operations and ~~their~~ its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/Ss/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

~~November~~December 1923, ~~2004~~2009

2124

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Leslie’s Holdings, Inc.)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands), Except Share Information)

	October 2, 2004			September 27,2003
	October 3,2009			September 27,2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2096,~~839~~981		$	1045,~~022~~648
Accounts and other receivables, net		10,505			7,801
Short term investments		—			19,899
Inventories, net		54,765			53,030
Accounts and other receivables, net		12,688			11,796
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,404			1,301
Inventories, net		68,934			86,584
Deferred tax assets		64,~~981~~237			64,~~028~~554
Total current assets		94,494			78,182
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6,763			2,773
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation		38,359			40,759
Total current assets		189,603			171,254
Goodwill, net		7,460			7,460
Property, plant and equipment, net		48,711			42,074
Deferred financing costs, net		1,811			2,069
Intangible assets		8,074			8,117
Other assets		468			466
Deferred financing costs, net		4,092			4,613
Total assets	$	142,592		$	128,936
Deferred tax assets		7,305			6,593
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Other assets		477			342
Total assets	$	258,262		$	232,993
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2231,~~247~~307		$	2642,~~217~~117
Accrued expenses		3040,~~643~~515			2836,~~739~~981
Income taxes payable		8,~~250~~963			7,~~816~~697
Total current liabilities		6180,~~140~~785			6286,~~772~~795
Other long term liabilities		14,673			7,914
Senior notes, net		163,243			167,000
Senior notes		59,495			59,495
Other long term liabilities		5,581			7,556
Deferred tax liabilities		59			1,017
Total liabilities		249,609			261,351
Total liabilities		135,367			131,198
Commitments and contingencies
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Stockholder’s equity (deficit):
Series A redeemable preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 2,000,000 shares, Issued and outstanding 46,316 shares at October 2, 2004 and 45,915 shares at September 27, 2003		46,316			45,915
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 100 shares, issued and outstanding 100 shares at October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008		—			—
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Capital deficit		(91,730	)		(91,907	)
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 12,000,000 shares, Issued and outstanding 7,369,502 shares at October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, respectively		7			7
Retained earnings		100,383			63,549
Stock subscription receivable		(450	)		(450	)
Total stockholder’s equity (deficit)		8,653			(28,358	)
Paid-in capital		(44,714	)		(44,714	)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity (deficit)	$	258,262		$	232,993
Retained earnings (deficit)		6,066			(3,020	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(39,091	)		(48,177	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	142,592		$	128,936

See accompanying notes to which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2225

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

~~Consolidated Statements~~(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of ~~Income~~Leslie’s Holdings, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

	Fiscal Years Ended
	October 2, 2004			September 27, 2003			September 28,2002
	October 3,2009			September 27,2008			September 29,2007
Sales	$	~~356~~509,~~041~~642		$	~~327~~488,~~165~~818		$	~~313~~468,~~311~~882
Cost of merchandise and services sold, including warehousing and transportation expenses, and related occupancy costs		183,928			171,219			166,340
Cost of merchandise and services sold, including warehousing and transportation expenses, and store occupancy costs		299,469			295,727			289,002
Gross profit		~~172~~210,~~113~~173			~~155~~193,~~946~~091			~~146~~179,~~971~~880
Selling, general and administrative expenses		~~137~~121,~~881~~744			~~128~~113,~~290~~245			~~125~~110,~~079~~021
Unusual expense		—			—			1,500
Loss on disposition of fixed assets		626			385			186
Amortization of goodwill		—			—			319
Operating income		87,803			79,461			69,673
Operating income		34,232			27,656			20,073
Other expense (income):
Other (income) expense:
Interest expense		14,083			14,553			16,102
Interest expense		7,204			9,598			10,708
Interest income		(279	)		(1,495	)		(1,390	)
Write-off of debt issuance costs		—			420			—
Gain on debt extinguishment		(357	)		(102	)		—
Interest income		(32	)		(32	)		(18	)
Total other expense		13,447			12,956			14,712
Loss on disposition of fixed assets		440			497			1,332
Income before taxes		74,356			66,505			54,961
Total other expense		7,612			10,483			12,022
Income tax expense		28,122			26,029			22,735
Income before taxes		26,620			17,173			8,051
Net income	$	46,234		$	40,476		$	32,226
Income tax expense		10,374			6,830			3,358
Net income		16,246			10,343			4,693
Series A preferred stock dividends and accretion		7,160			6,191			5,325
Income/(loss) applicable to common shareholders	$	9,086		$	4,152		$	(632	)

See accompanying notes to which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2326

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

~~Consolidated Statements~~(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of ~~Stockholders~~Leslie’s ~~Equity~~Holdings, ~~(Deficit~~ Inc.)

~~(Dollar~~Consolidated ~~Amounts~~Statements inof ~~Thousands,~~Stockholder’s ~~except~~Equity ~~share amounts~~(Deficit)

	Common Stock				StockSubscriptionReceivable			AdditionalPaid InCapital			RetainedEarnings/(Deficit)			TotalStockholders’Equity/(Deficit)
	Number ofShares		Amount
Balance, at September 29, 2001	7,057,105		$	7	$	(450	)	$	(45,301	)	$	(3,020	)	$	(2,284	)
Series A preferred stock dividends and accretion	—			—		—			—			(5,325	)		(5,325	)
Issuance common stock	8,333			—		—			17			—			17
Net income	—			—		—			—			4,693			4,693
Balance, at September 28, 2002	7,065,438			7		(450	)		(45,284	)		(7,172	)		(52,899	)
Series A preferred stock dividends and accretion	—			—		—			—			(6,191	)		(6,191	)
Issuance common stock (1)	390,270			—		—			1,070			—			1,070
Repurchase common stock	(86,206	)							(500	)		—			(500	)
Net income	—			—		—			—			10,343			10,343
Balance, at September 27, 2003	7,369,502			7		(450	)		(44,714	)		(3,020	)		(48,177	)
Series A preferred stock dividends and accretion	—			—		—			—			(7,160	)		(7,160	)
Net Income	—			—		—			—			16,246			16,246
Balance, at October 2, 2004	7,369,502		$	7	$	(450	)	$	(44,714	)	$	6,066		$	(39,091	)

(Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

(1) Net of related income tax benefit of $655,000.


	Common Stock					Capital Deficit			Treasury Stock			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholder’s Equity/(Deficit)
	Number of Shares		Amount			Capital Deficit			Treasury Stock			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholder’s Equity/(Deficit)
Balance, at September 30, 2006	40,045,000		$	40		$	(144,081	)	$	(332	)	$	22,149		$	(122,224	)
Issuance of common stock	100			0			—			—			—			0
Converted common stock in Reorganization	(40,045,000	)		(40	)		40			—			—			0
Contributed redeemable preferred stock in Reorganization	—			—			50,305			—			—			50,305
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	—			—			2,084			—			—			2,084
Payment of dividend	—			—			—			—			(15,002	)		(15,002	)
Repurchase and converted treasury stock in Reorganization	—			—			(332	)		332			—			0
Net income	—			—			—			—			32,226			32,226

Balance, at September 29, 2007	100			—			(91,984	)		0			39,373			(52,611	)

Stock option compensation	—			—			77			—			—			77
Payment of dividend	—			—			—			—			(16,300	)		(16,300	)
Net income	—			—			—			—			40,476			40,476

Balance, at September 27, 2008	100			—			(91,907	)		0			63,549			(28,358	)

Stock option compensation	—			—			177			—			—			177
Payment of dividend	—			—			—			—			(9,400	)		(9,400	)
Net income	—			—			—			—			46,234			46,234

Balance, at October 3, 2009	100		$	—		$	(91,730	)	$	0		$	100,383		$	8,653

See accompanying notes towhich are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2427

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Leslie’s Holdings, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

	Fiscal Years Ended
	October 2, 2004			September 27, 2003			September 28,2002
	October 3,2009			September 27,2008			September 29,2007
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	1646,~~246~~234		$	1040,~~343~~476		$	432,~~693~~226
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		10,628			9,661			9,044
Dividends and accretion on preferred stock		—			—			1,886
Amortization of loan fees and discounts		518			1,174			664
Depreciation and amortization		13,183			12,385			12,619
Allowance for doubtful accounts		316			660			437
Stock option compensation		177			77			—
Deferred income taxes		(1,911	)		855			(2,263	)
Amortization of loan fees		1,125			1,040			515
Loss on disposition of assets		440			497			1,332
Amortization of loan discounts		173			152			134
Provision for doubtful accounts		185			97			2
Deferred income taxes		(395	)		(374	)		1,873
Loss on disposition of fixed assets		626			385			186
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(357	)		(102	)		—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables		(31,~~020~~077	)		(13,~~063~~103	)		(~~385~~1,477	)
Inventories		(117,~~735~~650	)		2(20,~~510~~860	)		~~395~~(1,180	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(~~103~~3,990	)		(66211	)		(5940	)
Other assets		(2135	)		92(15	)		(747	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(29,~~066~~252	)		712,~~982~~767			41,~~195~~341
Income taxes payable		~~(434~~1,266	)		(~~409~~1,586	)		2(1,~~226~~757	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1965,~~745~~413			3241,~~236~~128			2046,~~205~~321
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(9,286	)		(8,107	)		(8,040	)
Purchase of short term investments		—			(19,899	)		—
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment		618			9			20
Sale of short term investments		19,899			—			—
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,668	)		(8,098	)		(8,020	)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(20,383	)		(16,985	)		(13,038	)
Purchases of intangible assets		(28	)		(85	)		(84	)
Proceeds from disposition of fixed assets		9			138			496
Net cash used in investing activities		(503	)		(36,831	)		(12,626	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payments of long-term debt		—			(30,519	)		(974	)
Revolving commitment borrowing		4,988			—			18,400
Purchase of common stock		—			(500	)		—
Revolving commitment repayment		(4,988	)		—			(18,400	)
Payments of deferred financing cost		(260	)		(2,163	)		—
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—			—			2,084
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		—			1,070			17
Payment of dividend		(9,400	)		(16,300	)		(15,002	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(260	)		(32,112	)		(957	)
Payments of deferred financing costs		(604	)		—			—
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		10,817			(7,974	)		11,228
Repurchase of long-term debt		(3,573	)		(2,130	)		—
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		10,022			17,996			6,768
Net cash used in financing activities		(13,577	)		(18,430	)		(12,918	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR	$	20,839		$	10,022		$	17,996
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		51,333			(14,133	)		20,777
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		45,648			59,781			39,004
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR	$	96,981		$	45,648		$	59,781

See accompanying notes to which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2528

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Leslie’s Holdings, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Business and Operations

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. (“Leslie’s” or the “Company”) is a specialty retailer of swimming pool supplies and related products. As of October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, the Company ~~marketed~~markets its products under the trade name Leslie’s Swimming Pool Supplies through ~~474~~622 retail stores in 3635 states and through mail order catalogs sent to ~~selected~~select swimming pool owners nationwide. The Company also repackages certain bulk chemical products for retail sale. The Company’s business is highly seasonal as the majority of its sales and all of its operating profits are generated in the quarters ending in June and September.

OnHolding June 11, 1997, Leslie’s Poolmart (a California corporation – “Leslie’s California”) reincorporated in Delaware by merging into a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary (the “Reincorporation”), changed its name to Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. and merged Poolmart USA Inc., a newly-formed corporation, with and into the Company ~~(the~~Formation “Recapitalization”). As a result of the Recapitalization, (i) each outstanding share of common stock of Leslie’s California was converted into $2.90 cash (other than 1,797,525 shares owned primarily by members of management); and (ii) outstanding options covering approximately 4,150,000 shares of common stock, including those not yet vested, were exercised and retired for payment of the difference between the exercise price and $2.90 per share. The total value of the shares and options cashed out approximated $94,300,000, plus $5,229,000 in expenses associated with this transaction. In connection with the Recapitalization, the Company changed the authorized capital of the Company to 12,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.001 par value and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $0.001 par value.

In ~~order~~February 2007 the Company became a subsidiary of Leslie’s Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) pursuant to ~~finance~~a tax-free reorganization in which the ~~merger~~Company’s shareholders became shareholders of Holdings in the same proportions (the “2007 Reorganization”). As a result of the 2007 Reorganization, each share of outstanding common stock of the Company ~~issued~~was ~~$90.0~~converted ~~million~~into one share of ~~its~~common stock of Holdings, and each share of outstanding 10~~.375~~% ~~Senior~~senior ~~Notes~~redeemable ~~due~~exchangeable ~~2003~~cumulative ~~(“Senior~~preferred ~~Notes~~stock ~~due~~of inthe ~~2004”)~~Company ~~and~~was ~~sold~~converted 5into one share of 10% senior redeemable exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of Holdings with the same rights,~~370~~ privileges,~~690~~ ~~shares~~and preferences, including as to liquidation. The conversion of ~~its~~the ~~common~~10% senior redeemable exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of the Company for ~~proceeds~~similar stock of ~~$15.6~~Holdings ~~million.~~was Asaccounted ~~indicated~~for ~~above~~as contributed capital to the Company, ~~certain~~given ~~directors~~that ~~and~~the ~~members~~assumption of ~~management~~the obligation ~~converted~~by ~~some~~Holdings ofwithout recourse to the ~~Leslie’s California~~Company ~~common~~had ~~shares~~the ~~which~~effect ~~they~~of ~~owned~~extinguishing ~~into~~the ~~shares~~rights of the ~~Company’s~~preferred ~~common~~stockholders ~~stock~~and the resulting obligation.

~~Also~~2005 ~~in connection with the~~ Recapitalization,: the Company issued 28,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share, at $1,000 per share for a total consideration of $28.0 million, consisting of cash and an exchange of the $10.0 million principal amount of Convertible Subordinated Debentures of Leslie’s California held by a major supplier. In connection with this transaction, the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock received Warrants to purchase up to 15.0% of the shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.01 per share (subject to adjustment) for a period of ten years.

During the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005 the Company consummated the following transactions, which the Company refers to collectively as the “2005 Recapitalization”:

The Merger

LPM Acquisition LLC (“LPM Acquisition”), a newly-formed entity controlled by GCP California Fund, L.P. (“GCP”), and affiliates of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. (“LGP”), merged with and into Leslie’s on January 25, 2005, with Leslie’s continuing as the surviving entity in the merger.

The Tender Offer and Consent Solicitation

On December 23, 2004, the Company commenced a tender offer and solicitation of consents, or the “Tender Offer”, to purchase all of the $59.5 million outstanding principal amount of the Company’s 10³/8% Senior Notes due 2008, and to amend the indenture governing the 10³/8% notes to eliminate most of the covenants and certain events of default. On January 11, 2005, the Company entered into a supplemental indenture with The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as the trustee, supplementing the indenture dated as of May 21, 2003 as contemplated by the terms of the tender offer.

Note Offering

On January 25, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of $170.0 million principal amount of the Senior Notes. The net proceeds from the offering of the 7³/4% notes, together with borrowings under an amended credit facility, proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and cash on hand, were used to complete the 2005 Recapitalization and repurchase the outstanding 10³/8% notes that were tendered in the Tender Offer. Subsequent to the initial private placement of the 7³/4% notes, the notes were exchanged for new registered 7³/4% Senior Notes, Series B, in June 2005, pursuant to an exchange offer.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The 2005 Recapitalization was accounted for as a series of equity transactions and there was no change in the accounting basis for the Company’s recorded assets and liabilities. Accordingly, no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded related to the 2005 Recapitalization.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries, LPM, Manufacturing Inc., Sandy’s Pool Supply, Inc. and Blackwood & Simmons, Inc. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

Operating Segments

FASB establishes standards for the way that public companies report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and establishes standards for related disclosures about product and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company has reviewed the standard and determined that we have a single reportable segment.

Fiscal Periods

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. The fiscal year ended on October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, included 53 weeks, and the fiscal years ended September 27, ~~2003,~~2008 and September 28 29, ~~2002~~2007 each included 52 weeks.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

26Short-term Investments

Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. Securities for which the Company does not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported in a separate component of stockholder’s equity, if material. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its debt securities to determine if a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary. When a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge would be recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established. The amortized cost of debt securities in this category is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization or accretion is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses and interest and dividends on securities are included in interest income. The cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method. Securities classified as available for sale include both securities due within one year and securities with maturity dates beyond one year.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses the established fair value hierarchy that ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The fair value of marketable securities is determined based on quoted market prices, which approximate fair value.

~~Leslie’s~~Notes ~~Poolmart,~~to ~~Inc.~~Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The fair value of the Senior Notes due 2013 (“the Notes”) using quoted market prices as of October 3, 2009 was $156.7 million and as of September 27, 2008 was $147.2 million. The carrying amounts of other long-term debt approximate fair value because either the interest rate fluctuates based on market rates or interest rates appear to ~~Consolidated~~approximate ~~Financial~~market ~~Statements~~rates for similar instruments. The fair value estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

Accounts and ~~Other~~other ~~Receivables~~receivables, ~~Net~~net

Accounts and other receivables include ~~allowances~~vendor ~~for~~rebate ~~doubtful~~receivables ~~accounts~~ of $~~928,000,~~6.8 ~~$1,125,000~~million and $~~717,000~~5.7 atmillion ~~October~~as 2,of ~~2004~~October 3, ~~September~~2009 and September 27, ~~2003~~2008, ~~and~~respectively. The Company recognizes consideration received from vendors at the time its obligations to purchase products or perform services have been completed. These items are recorded as a reduction of inventory until we ~~September~~sell ~~28,~~the ~~2002~~product, ~~respectively~~at which time such rebates reduce cost of goods sold in the statement of operations.

Allowance for ~~doubtful accounts~~Doubtful ~~consists of the following:~~ Accounts

	Balance atbeginning ofperiod		Additions Charged to costs and expenses		Deductions Write-off of Bad debts			Balance at end of period
Balance at September 28, 2002	$	422,000	$	437,000	$	(142,000	)	$	717,000
Balance at September 27, 2003		717,000		660,000		(252,000	)		1,125,000
Balance at October 2, 2004		1,125,000		316,000		(513,000	)		928,000

Payment terms for trade receivables generally range from 30 to 90 days depending on the circumstances of each transaction or billing contract. Any payments not received within the agreed upon due date are considered past due.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Such allowance is computed based upon a specific customer account review of larger customers and balances past due. The Company’s assessment of its customers’ ability to pay generally includes direct contact with the customer, investigation into customers’ financial status, as well as consideration of customers’ payment history with the Company. If the Company determines, based on its assessment, that the Company’s customers will be unable to pay, the Company will charge off the account receivables to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Accounts and other receivables include allowances for doubtful accounts, which consists of the following:


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Balance at beginning of period		Additions	Deductions		Balance at end of period
*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Balance at beginning of period		Charged to costs and expenses	Write-off of bad debts		Balance at end of period
Balance at September 29, 2007	$	776	2	(188	)	$	590
Balance at September 27, 2008	$	590	97	(119	)	$	568
Balance at October 3, 2009	$	568	185	(105	)	$	648

Inventories, Net

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The Company values inventory using the weighted average method. The Company tests for obsolete inventory and records appropriate reserves. When an inventory item is sold or disposed, the associated reserve is adjusted at that time.

Inventory reserves consist of the following:

	Balance atbeginning ofperiod		Additions Charged to costs and expenses			Deductions Write-off of Inventories				Balance at end of period
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	Balance atbeginning ofperiod		Additions		Deductions			Balance atend ofperiod
Balance at September 28, 2002	$	142,000	$	586,000		$	(234,000	)		$	494,000
			Charged to costsand expenses		Sale anddisposal ofinventories
Balance at September 27, 2003		494,000		1,130,000			(433,000	)			1,191,000
Balance at September 29, 2007	$	2,930	159		(243	)		$	3,332
Balance at October 2, 2004		1,191,000		420,000			(364,000	)			1,247,000
Balance at September 27, 2008	$	3,332	256		(456	)		$	3,132
Balance at October 3, 2009	$	3,132	14		(564	)		$	2,582

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Costs of normal maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.

Major replacements or improvements of property, plant and equipment are capitalized. When items are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statements of ~~income~~operations.

Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method (considering appropriate salvage values) and leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the initial lease term. These charges are based on the following estimated average useful lives:

Buildings and improvements		5-39 years
Vehicles, machinery and equipment		3-10 years
Aircraft		5-10 years
Office furniture and equipment		3-7 years
Leasehold improvements		5-10 years, not to exceed the lease life, including expected renewals

27The Company reviews its long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

~~Table~~Goodwill ofand ~~Contents~~Other Intangibles

~~Leslie~~Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the estimated fair market value of the acquired net assets. The goodwill balance is $7.5 million at October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008. The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. The Company completed its goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 and determined there was no impairment in either year. Other intangibles are comprised of costs associated with acquiring the mailing addresses for the Company’s ~~Poolmart~~customer database, ~~Inc~~which is used for purposes of market research, new store location decisions, customer research and in the Company’s ongoing advertising efforts. For the years ending October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008, the gross amount capitalized on the balance sheet for mailing addresses was $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively and the accumulated amortization was $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. These other intangibles are amortized over a 15 year period and the annual amortization for the next five years is expected to be approximately $60,000 each year.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Goodwill

The excess of the acquisition price over the fair value of the net assets at the date of acquisition is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as “Goodwill.” In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141 Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company applied the new rules on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives beginning on September 29, 2002. The Company also performed the required impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets and there was no impairment identified. The Company no longer amortizes its goodwill under SFAS No. 142, but does subject its goodwill to periodic assessments as defined therein. The balance recorded at October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 was net of accumulated amortization of $3.1 million. The Company recorded no amortization for the years ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 and $319,000 for the year-ended September 28, 2002.

Deferred Financing Costs

In connection with issuing the Senior Notes due ~~2004~~2013 (see Note 8) and entering into a credit agreement in ~~1997~~in 2005, as further amended in 2009, the Company paid an aggregate of $38.73 million in financing costs that are being deferred and amortized over the lives of the corresponding agreements. ~~During~~The ~~fiscal~~deferred ~~2003,~~finance ~~the~~cost Company recorded $2.2 million in costs associated with the exchange of $59.5 million of Senior Notes due 2004 and concurrently expensed $420,000 of unamortized costs associated with the original 1997 Senior Note issuance. The balance recorded at October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009 and September 27, 2008 ~~2003~~ was net of accumulated amortization of $14.32 million and $~~744~~3.2 million,~~000,~~ respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company provides for deferred income taxes relating to temporary timing differences in the recognition of income and expense items ~~(primarily depreciation and amortization)~~ for financial and tax reporting purposes. ~~Deferred~~The ~~taxes~~Company atand ~~October~~its 2,subsidiaries ~~2004~~are ~~and~~included ~~September~~in ~~27,~~the ~~2003~~consolidated ~~include~~federal aincome ~~provision~~tax ~~for~~return ~~the~~and ~~differences~~certain ~~between tax~~state ~~and~~income ~~financial~~tax ~~asset~~returns ~~values~~of ~~except~~Holdings. ~~that~~The ~~deferred~~Company’s ~~taxes~~financial ~~were~~statements ~~not~~recognize ~~provided~~the ~~with~~current ~~respect~~and deferred toincome ~~amounts~~tax ~~allocated~~consequences tothat ~~goodwill.~~result from the

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Company’s activities during the current and preceding periods, as if the Company were a separate taxpayer rather than a member of Holding’s consolidated income tax return group.

In 2007, the Company adopted the authoritative accounting guidance related to the financial statement recognition, measurement, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized.

Sales

Revenue on retail sales is recognized upon purchase by the customer. Revenue on services is recognized as services are performed and the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. Terms are customarily FOB shipping point or point of sale, net of related discounts. The Company does not provide an estimated allowance for sales returns as they are ~~deemed to be~~ immaterial.

Cost of Sales

Included in cost of sales are the costs of services and purchased goods, chemical repackaging costs, related distribution costs and occupancy costs related ~~distribution~~to ~~costs~~retail locations. The Company recognizes consideration received from vendors at the time the obligations to purchase products or perform services have been completed. These items are recorded as a reduction in cost of goods sold in the statement of ~~income~~operations.

Shipping and Handing Costs

The Company records shipping and handling costs paid by customers as ~~a reduction in cost of sales~~revenue. ~~Likewise,~~The ~~the actual~~ costs for shipping and handling are charged to cost of sales.

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising ~~during~~costs ~~the~~as ~~period of the event~~incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, September 27, ~~2003,~~2008 and September 29, 282007, ~~2002~~ was approximately $8.35 million, $8.4 million, and $8.7 million, respectively.6 For the years ending October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, the Company’s recorded advertising expense was shown net of cooperative advertising of $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $70.47 million, respectively.

Stock Based Compensation

~~The~~Holdings, and prior to the 2007 Reorganization, the Company, ~~grants~~may grant stock options for a fixed number of shares of Holdings to the Company’s employees and directors with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. ~~The~~In ~~Company~~2007, ~~accounts~~the ~~for~~Company ~~such~~adopted ~~stock option grants using~~ the ~~intrinsic-value~~authoritative ~~method of~~ accounting inguidance ~~accordance~~related ~~with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued~~ to ~~Employees,~~new ~~and related~~awards ~~interpretations,~~ and ~~the~~to ~~disclosure~~awards ~~requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123~~modified, repurchased ~~Accounting~~or ~~for~~cancelled ~~Stock-Based~~after ~~Compensation and SFAS No. 148~~September 29, ~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure~~2007. ~~Under~~Awards ~~APB~~granted ~~25,~~after ~~the Company generally recognizes no compensation expense with respect to such awards. Also~~September 29, ~~the~~2007 ~~Company~~are ~~does~~valued ~~not~~at ~~record~~fair ~~any~~value ~~compensation~~and ~~expense~~are inrecognized ~~connection with our stock Option Plan. If stock options had been accounted for consistent with SFAS No. 123, these amounts would be amortized~~ on a straight- line basis ~~as compensation expense~~ over the ~~average~~service ~~holding~~periods ~~period~~ of ~~the~~each ~~options~~award. ~~and~~Compensation ~~the~~cost ~~Company’s net income would have decreased by $142,000 and $99,000~~ for the ~~fiscal~~unvested portion ~~years~~of ~~ended~~awards ~~2004~~outstanding ~~and~~is ~~2003,~~recognized ~~respectively~~as ~~and~~ the ~~Company’s~~requisite ~~net~~service ~~loss~~is ~~would have increased by $96,000 in fiscal year ended 2002~~rendered.

~~Pro~~As ~~forma~~of ~~results~~the ~~disclosed~~2007 ~~are~~Reorganization, ~~based on~~ the ~~provisions~~2005 Plan ofand ~~SFAS~~related ~~123~~agreements ~~using~~were ~~the~~assumed ~~Black-Scholes~~by ~~option~~Holdings. ~~valuation~~All ~~model~~grants from and ~~are~~after ~~not~~the ~~likely~~2007 toReorganization ~~be representative~~ of options under the ~~effects~~2005 onPlan ~~pro~~are ~~forma~~for ~~net~~equity ~~income~~of ~~for~~Holdings ~~future~~and ~~years.~~not Inthe ~~addition~~Company, ~~the~~but ~~Black-Scholes~~will ~~option~~be ~~valuation~~recorded ~~model~~as ~~was~~an ~~developed~~expense ~~for~~by ~~use~~the inCompany. ~~estimating~~During the second ~~fair~~quarter ~~value~~ of ~~traded~~2007 ~~options, which have no vesting restrictions~~ and ~~are~~pursuant ~~fully~~to ~~transferable.~~the ~~In addition~~2005 Plan, ~~option~~Holdings’ ~~valuation~~board ~~models~~of ~~require~~directors approved the ~~input~~acceleration of ~~highly subjective assumptions including~~ the ~~expected~~vesting ~~stock~~of ~~price~~all ~~volatility.~~outstanding ~~Because the Company’s~~ stock options ~~have~~to ~~characteristics~~purchase ~~significantly~~shares ~~different~~of ~~from~~common ~~those~~stock of ~~traded~~Holdings. ~~options, and~~The ~~because~~fair ~~changes~~value inof the ~~subjective~~awards immediately ~~input~~before ~~assumptions~~the ~~can~~modification ~~materially~~of ~~affect~~ the ~~fair~~vesting ~~value~~was ~~estimate, in our opinion,~~ the ~~estimating~~same ~~models~~value doas ~~not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of~~ the fair value ofafter ~~our~~the ~~stock~~modification ~~options~~took effect. Accordingly,

Fair Value of Financial Statements

The fair value of the $59.5 million Senior Notes due 2008 using quoted market prices as of October 2, 2004 is $66.9 million. The carrying amounts of other long-term debt approximate fair value because either the interest rate fluctuates based on market rates or interest rates appear to approximate market rates for similar instruments. The fair value estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46), was issued in January 2003 and addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities. FIN 46 clarifies existing accounting for whether variable interest entities, as defined in FIN 46, should be consolidated in financial statements based upon the investee’s ability to finance activities without additional financial support and whether investors possess characteristics of a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. For variable interest entities created

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

or acquired after January 31, 2003, the provision was to be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. In October 2003, the FASB delayed the effective date of this provision until the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003. The Company does not have any variable interest entities and therefore this adoption will not have any effect on our results of operations or financial position.

In May 2003, SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, was issued. SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity, and is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective July 1, 2003. The Company at September 27, 2003 has $45.9 million of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock classified as mezzanine equity on the balance sheets. The effect of SFAS No. 150 will be to reclassify this balance from the mezzanine section of the balance sheet to a liability classification on the balance sheet. In addition, the accretion of the value of the preferred stock will be classified as interest expense instead of reducing retained deficit. In October 2003, the SFAS agreed to defer the effective date of Statement 150 to entities that have issued shares that are mandatorily redeemable on a fixed date at a fixed principal amount to fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2003. Accordingly, the Company will adopt this standard beginning October 1, 2004. Had the standard been adopted, interest expense for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 would have been increased by $7,160,000 and $6,191,000, respectively and preferred stock dividends and accretion in the statements of stockholders’ equity would have been reduced by the same amount.

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	October 2, 2004			September 27, 2003
Raw materials and supplies	$	355,000		$	371,000
Finished goods		55,657,000			53,850,000
Reserve		(1,247,000	)		(1,191,000	)
Total Inventories	$	54,765,000		$	53,030,000

4. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

	October 2, 2004		September 27, 2003
Land	$	5,865,000	$	6,215,000
Buildings and addresses		8,571,000		8,815,000
Vehicles, machinery and equipment		4,540,000		4,240,000
Leasehold improvements		41,201,000		36,886,000
Office furniture, equipment and other		33,631,000		30,911,000
Construction-in-process		672,000		1,536,000
		94,480,000		88,603,000
Less – accumulated deprecation and amortization		56,121,000		47,844,000
Total Property, Plant and Equipment	$	38,359,000	$	40,759,000

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5. Loan and Security Agreement

In June of 2000, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Retail Finance LLC. Under the Agreement, maximum borrowings were $65.0 million with the minimum amount available not to fall below $40.0 million, reduced by outstanding letters of credit, and with a maturity date set at January 31, 2004. Under the Agreement, maximum borrowings are limited as a function of inventory or calculated EBITDA rates as defined in the Agreement.

On October 31, 2003, the Company amended the Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Retail Finance LLC. The Amended Agreement extends the maturity date to January 15, 2008 and allows the Company to optionally increase its maximum borrowing to $75.0 million. The Amended Agreement contains certain financial covenants that include minimum calculated EBITDA levels, maximum capital expenditure amounts, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, and Senior Leverage Ratio. As of October 2, 2004, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. At October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Agreement. Borrowings under the Agreement accrue interest at the lender’s reference rate or at LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR rate margin. Based on the LIBOR rate margin at October 2, 2004, the interest rate was 3.3%. The margins are determined by calculated LTM EBITDA rates as defined in the Agreement.

6. Senior Notes

On June 11, 1997, the Company issued $90.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 10.375 percent Senior Notes due July 15, 2004 (the “2004 Notes”). The 2004 Notes were issued under an indenture by and between the Company and U.S. Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee.

Interest on the 2004 Notes accrued at the rate of 10.375 percent per annum and was payable semi-annually in arrears on each January 15 and July 15 commencing on January 15, 1998. The 2004 Notes were redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company on or after July 15, 2001, at the specified redemption prices.

On May 16, 2003, the Company entered into exchange agreements with holders of a majority in principal amount of our 2004 Notes pursuant to which the Company exchanged 10.375 percent Senior Notes due 2008, Series A, (the “Series A Notes”) for the 2004 Notes held by them. The exchanges of the 2004 Notes closed on May 21, 2003. In connection with those exchanges, the Company entered into several registration rights agreements which required the exchange of the Series A Notes for registered 10.375 percent Notes due 2008, Series B (the “Series B Notes”). On September 8, 2003, the Company completed its offer to exchange up to $56.5 million aggregate principal amount of Series A Notes for the Series B Notes and a total of $3.0 million of Series A Notes remained outstanding. The remaining $30.5 million of the 2004 Notes were redeemed with cash.

The Series A Notes and the Series B Notes are generally unsecured obligations of the Company and will be subordinated to any secured indebtedness of the Company. In the event of a change of control, the Company will be required to make an offer to purchase all outstanding Notes at a price equal to 101 percent of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase.

The Series A Notes and the Series B Notes were issued under an indenture by and between the Company and the Bank of New York, as trustee (the “Indenture”). The Indenture contains certain covenants which include, among other matters, limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the payment of dividends. As of October 2, 2004, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7. Leases

The Company leases certain store, office, distribution and manufacturing facilities under operating leases which expire at various dates through 2013. Lease agreements generally provide for increases related to cost of living indices and require the Company to pay for property taxes, repairs and insurance. Future annual minimum lease payments at October 2, 2004 are as follows:

2005	$	30,821,000
2006		25,521,000
2007		20,907,000
2008		15,294,000
2009		9,919,000
Thereafter		4,951,000
	$	107,413,000

Certain leases are renewable at the option of the Company for periods of one to ten years. Rent expense charged against income totaled $26.5 million, $24.3 million, and $23.8 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. Five leases provided for rent contingent on sales exceeding specific amounts.

Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

8. Income Taxes

The provision/(benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the following:

	53 Weeks EndedOctober 2, 2004			52 Weeks EndedSeptember 27, 2003		52 Weeks EndedSeptember 28, 2002
Federal:
Current	$	9,722,000		$	4,706,000	$	4,507,000
Deferred		(1,512,000	)		673,000		(1,860,000	)
	$	8,210,000		$	5,379,000	$	2,647,000
State:
Current	$	2,563,000		$	1,269,000	$	1,114,000
Deferred		(399,000	)		182,000		(403,000	)
		2,164,000			1,451,000		711,000
Total	$	10,374,000		$	6,830,000	$	3,358,000

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount computed at the federal statutory rate is as follows:

	53 Weeks EndedOctober 2, 2004			52 Weeks EndedSeptember 27, 2003		52 Weeks EndedSeptember 28, 2002
Federal income tax at statutory rate	$	9,317,000		$	5,839,000	$	2,737,000
Permanent differences		36,000			33,000		151,000
State taxes, net of federal benefit		1,407,000			958,000		470,000
Other		(386,000	)		—		—
	$	10,374,000		$	6,830,000	$	3,358,000

The tax effect of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax asset and liability are summarized below.

	Fiscal 2004						Fiscal 2003
	Deferred Tax Assets			Deferred TaxLiabilities			Deferred TaxAssets			Deferred TaxLiabilities
Depreciation and amortization	$	988,000		$	—		$	687,000		$	—
State income taxes		—			—			—			—
Inventory		—			(59,000	)		—			(317,000	)
Reserves and other accruals		4,095,000			—			3,012,000			—
Deferred rent		597,000			—			629,000			—
Compensation accruals		733,000			—			1,115,000			—
Net operating loss		2,346,000			—			2,308,000			—
Other		490,000			—			481,000			(700,000	)
Valuation allowance		(2,268,000	)		—			(2,204,000	)		—
	$	6,981,000		$	(59,000	)	$	6,028,000		$	(1,017,000	)

~~Leslie’s~~Notes ~~Poolmart,~~to ~~Inc.~~Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

~~Notes~~ no compensation expense was recorded related to ~~Consolidated~~the ~~Financial~~acceleration ~~Statements~~of the options. All of the options granted prior to 2008 were exercised in February of 2007 after the 2007 Reorganization.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~fiscal ~~has~~2009, ~~federal~~the ~~net~~board ~~operating~~of ~~losses~~directors ~~(NOL)~~ of ~~$6.7~~Holdings ~~million~~approved ~~available~~grants toof ~~offset~~options ~~future tax liabilities through 2007. The losses are subject~~ to ~~Internal~~ ~~Revenue~~a ~~Code~~number ~~Section~~of ~~382~~key ~~which~~individuals ~~limits~~of the ~~annual utilization of NOL’s after an ownership change~~Company. These ~~The~~options ~~Company’s~~to ~~annual~~purchase ~~Section 382 limitation is~~ approximately ~~$83~~405,000. Asshares ~~such, approximately $6.5 million~~ of ~~these~~Holdings ~~NOL’s~~common ~~will expire~~stock asvest ~~worthless.~~over ~~The~~a ~~Company~~five ~~has~~year ~~recorded~~period at a ~~valuation~~rate ~~allowance amount~~ of ~~$2,268,000~~20% ~~and~~annually ~~$2,204,000~~on aseach anniversary of ~~October~~the 2,date ~~2004~~of ~~and September 27, 2003, respectively~~grant.

9For the years ending October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008, the Company’s recognized share-based compensation expense of $177,000 and $77,000, respectively. ~~Contingencies~~No share-based compensation expense was recorded during fiscal year 2007.

~~The~~Use ~~Company is a defendant in lawsuits or potential claims encountered in the normal course~~ of ~~business; such matters are being vigorously defended. In~~ ~~the~~Estimates ~~opinion~~in ~~of management,~~ the ~~resolutions~~Preparation of ~~these~~Consolidated ~~matters~~Financial ~~will~~Statements ~~not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.~~

OnThe ~~January~~preparation ~~31,~~of ~~2002,~~financial astatements ~~former~~in ~~employee~~conformity with ~~brought~~accounting aprinciples ~~purported~~generally ~~class~~accepted ~~action lawsuit against the Company~~ in ~~California Superior Court for~~ the ~~County~~United ofStates ~~Los Angeles.~~requires ~~The~~management ~~complaint alleged failure~~ to ~~pay~~make ~~overtime~~estimates ~~wages, waiting time penalties~~ and ~~unfair~~assumptions ~~business~~that ~~practices~~affect ~~and sought monetary and injunctive relief. A settlement totaling $1.2 million was reached by~~ the ~~parties~~reported ~~during~~amounts aof ~~mediation~~assets onand ~~April 2~~liabilities, ~~2002.~~disclosure ~~The~~of ~~Court~~contingent ~~approved~~assets ~~the~~and ~~settlement~~liabilities inat ~~a final fairness hearing on August 20, 2002. During~~ the ~~second~~date ~~quarter~~ of ~~2002,~~ the financial ~~Company~~statements ~~reserved a total of $1.5 million for this settlement~~ and ~~its~~the ~~related~~reported ~~legal~~amounts ~~and~~of ~~other~~ expenses, ~~and~~during ~~for~~the ~~which this~~reporting ~~amount was subsequently paid~~period. AsActual ofresults ~~October~~could 2,differ ~~2004~~from ~~there~~those ~~were no other costs associated with this matter~~estimates.

~~The~~Reclassification ~~Company’s general liability insurance program and employee group medical plan have self-insurance retention features~~ of ~~$250,000~~Accounts ~~and $100,000 per incident, respectively.~~

10Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. ~~401(k)~~The ~~Plan~~reclassification had no effect on net income as previously reported.

~~The~~Classification ~~Company provides for the benefit~~ of ~~its~~Cost ~~employees a voluntary retirement plan under Section 401(k)~~ of ~~the~~merchandise ~~Internal Revenue Code. During 2002, the plan covered all eligible employees~~ and ~~provided~~services ~~for~~sold a matching contribution by the Company of 50% of each participant’s contribution up to 4% of the individual’s compensation as defined. The expenses related to this program were $375,000, $381,000 and $384,000 for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

11During fiscal 2009, management reviewed its classification of certain expenses on its Consolidated Statement of Operations. ~~Equity~~Previously, ~~Transactions~~the Company reported occupancy costs attributed to its retail locations in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company now reports occupancy costs attributed to its retail locations in cost of merchandise and services sold and has made conforming reclassification adjustments to previous periods presented.

~~Preferred~~For ~~Stock~~fiscal 2008 and 2007, the change in classification results in an increase of cost of merchandise and services sold of approximately $60.0 million and $56.3 million, respectively, with a corresponding decrease in gross profit and selling, general and administrative expenses.

InClassification ~~connection with the Recapitalization transaction, the Company sold 28,000 shares~~ of ~~Series~~occupancy Acosts ~~Preferred~~attributed ~~Stock for total consideration of $28.0 million.~~to ~~The~~retail ~~holders~~locations ofvaries ~~the~~within ~~Series A Preferred Stockholder (~~the ~~“Preferred~~Company’s ~~Stockholder”)~~industry isand ~~entitled~~management tobelieves anthe ~~annual~~new ~~cumulative~~classification ~~dividend~~more ~~(which~~closely isreflects ~~payable at~~ the ~~option~~nature of ~~the~~these ~~Company~~expenses ~~either~~and inwill ~~cash~~result or in ~~additional~~an ~~shares~~improved offinancial ~~Preferred~~statement ~~Stock for the first five years) and during which time the annual dividend is payable quarterly at the annual rate of 10~~presentation.~~875~~ ~~percent, compounded semi-annually.~~ The ~~Preferred~~reclassifications ~~Stockholder is entitled to elect 20 percent of the members of the Board of Directors of~~had ~~the~~no ~~Company.~~effect ~~During~~on ~~fiscal~~net ~~2003~~income ~~which completed the first five years under the agreement, this annual cumulative dividend converted to an accrued cash dividend~~ and isare ~~payable~~presented atbelow ~~the~~for ~~annual rate of 15.875 percent, compounded semi-annually. As of October 2, 2004,~~ the ~~cumulative~~periods ~~unpaid~~affected ~~dividend~~(in isthousands): ~~$14.7 million.~~

The Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company at any time at 101 percent of the per share price plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. The Company is required to redeem the Preferred Stock in three equal installments terminating on the tenth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Preferred Shares. As such, the Company is accreting the Preferred Stock balance over the ten-year period to adjust the related liability in the amount of $401,000 and $398,000 recorded in 2004 and 2003, respectively.


	Fiscal 2008
*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Before reclassification		Reclassification			After reclassification
Cost of merchandise and services sold	$	235,678	$	60,049		$	295,727
Gross profit		253,140		(60,049	)		193,091
Selling, general and administrative expense		173,294		(60,049	)		113,245

In connection with the issuance of the Preferred Stock, the original Preferred Stockholder received 1,264,980 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share expiring in June of 2007. Of the $28.0 million


	Fiscal 2007
*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Before reclassification		Reclassification			After reclassification
Cost of merchandise and services sold	$	232,749	$	56,253		$	289,002
Gross profit		236,133		(56,253	)		179,880
Selling, general and administrative expense		166,274		(56,253	)		110,021

~~Leslie’s~~Notes ~~Poolmart,~~to ~~Inc.~~Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

~~Notes~~Recent toAccounting ~~Consolidated~~Pronouncements ~~Financial Statements~~

~~face~~In ~~value~~December of2007, the ~~Preferred~~FASB ~~Stock,~~issued ~~$3.1~~guidance ~~million~~relating ~~was assigned~~ to ~~the~~business ~~value~~combinations ofand ~~these~~requires ~~Warrants~~the ~~and~~acquirer ~~reflected~~to asrecognize athe ~~discount~~assets onacquired, the liabilities ~~Preferred~~assumed, ~~Stock.~~and ~~This~~any ~~discount~~noncontrolling isinterest ~~being accreted~~in ~~over~~ the ~~life~~acquiree ofat the ~~Preferred~~acquisition ~~Stock.~~date, ~~The~~measured ~~terms~~at oftheir ~~the~~fair ~~Warrant~~values ~~Agreement~~as ~~provide~~of ~~for~~that adate. ~~proportionate~~The ~~adjustment~~new ofaccounting ~~the~~guidance ~~warrants~~applies ~~for~~prospectively ~~stock~~to ~~splits~~business ~~and~~combinations ~~stock dividends and~~ for ~~additional~~which ~~warrant~~the ~~shares~~acquisition todate beis on ~~issuable~~or inafter the ~~event~~beginning ~~any~~ of the ~~1997~~ NQfirst ~~Options~~annual ~~(as~~reporting ~~such~~period ~~term~~beginning ison ~~defined~~or ~~below)~~after orDecember 15, ~~ISO~~2008. ~~Options~~An orentity ~~options~~may ~~under~~not ~~the~~apply ~~1998~~it ~~Plan~~before ~~(as~~that ~~such~~date. ~~term~~The isCompany ~~define~~must ~~below)~~adopt ~~are~~this ~~exercised.~~standard ~~Based~~for onits ~~the~~2010 ~~number~~fiscal ofyear. ~~options~~The ~~outstanding~~effects atof ~~October~~the 2,adoption ~~2004,~~of this anstandard ~~additional~~will ~~287,429~~have ~~warrants~~an ~~could~~impact ~~be granted~~on ifall ~~the~~future ~~options~~acquisitions ~~are~~beginning ~~exercised~~in 2010.

~~Common~~In ~~Stock~~May 2009, the FASB issued general standards of accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events that occur after the balance sheet date. Entities are also required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance, December 23, 2009 and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.

OnIn ~~March~~June 232009, ~~2001,~~ the ~~Company~~FASB ~~individually,~~issued ~~and~~guidance ~~Lawrence~~related Hayward, President and CEO, Donald Anderson, Executive Vice President and CFO, and Green Equity Investors II, L.P., the (“Purchasers”) entered into two separate Stock Purchase Agreements, the (“Agreements”) with Brian P. McDermott, (“McDermott”) the Company’s former President and CEO (the “McDermott Transactions”). Pursuant to the ~~Agreements,~~source ~~the Company repurchased 277,775 shares~~ of ~~the~~authoritative ~~Company’s~~accounting ~~voting~~principles ~~common~~recognized ~~stock held~~ by ~~McDermott~~the ~~for~~FASB anto ~~aggregate~~be ~~purchase~~applied ~~price~~by ofnon-governmental ~~$499,995~~entities ~~and~~in the ~~other~~preparation ~~Purchasers~~of ~~acquired~~financial ~~the~~statements ~~remaining~~in ~~554,985~~accordance ~~shares~~with ofgenerally ~~the~~accepted ~~Company’s~~accounting ~~voting~~principles. ~~common~~This ~~stock~~topic ~~held~~is byeffective ~~McDermott~~ for aninterim ~~aggregate~~and ~~purchase~~annual ~~price~~reporting ofperiods ~~$998,973.~~ending ~~Also~~after ~~pursuant to the Agreements~~September 15, ~~(i)~~2009. ~~McDermott’s~~The ~~existing~~implementation ~~options were cancelled and~~ of nothis ~~further~~standard ~~effect;~~did ~~(ii)~~not ~~McDermott~~have ~~resigned from his position as~~ a ~~director~~material impact on the ~~Board of Directors of the~~ Company;’s ~~and~~consolidated ~~(iii)~~financial ~~the existing Consulting Agreement~~position, ~~dated~~results as of ~~December~~operations ~~31,~~or ~~1999, between~~cash ~~McDermott and the Company was terminated~~flows.

~~As part of the McDermott Transactions, the Company entered into separate loan agreements with each of Mr~~3. ~~Hayward~~Short-term ~~and~~Investments Mr. Anderson, pursuant to which the Company loaned $225,000 to each of Hayward and Anderson, respectively, thereby providing a portion of the funds required for each of Anderson and Hayward to purchase the shares of the Company’s common stock held by McDermott. Each loan, together with all accrued interest, will be due and payable to the Company in full, on the earlier of: 1) the date which is 7 years from the date hereof; or 2) the termination of borrower’s employment with the Company for any reason, other than a termination by the Company without Just Cause. The loan agreements are secured by a portion of the shares purchased by each of Hayward and Anderson, pursuant to Pledge Agreements executed concurrently by each of Hayward and Anderson and are recorded as reductions in stockholders equity in the accompanying balance sheets.

OnThe ~~August 29, 2003, the~~ Company,’s ~~and~~short-term ~~GCP~~investments ~~California Fund L.P., the~~are ~~(“Purchasers”)~~classified ~~entered~~as ~~into~~available-for-sale aand ~~Stock~~recorded ~~Purchase~~at ~~Agreements,~~fair ~~(“Agreement”) with Robert D~~value. ~~Olsen,~~Financial ~~(“Olsen”)~~assets ~~the Company’s former Executive Vice President~~ and ~~CFO~~liabilities ~~(the~~carried ~~“Olsen~~at ~~Transaction”).~~fair ~~Pursuant~~value toare ~~the Agreement,~~classified ~~the Company repurchased 86,206 shares of the Company’s voting common stock held by Olsen for an aggregate purchase price of $499,995~~ and ~~the~~disclosed ~~other~~in ~~Purchasers~~one ~~acquired the remaining 429,094 shares~~ of the ~~Company’s~~following ~~voting~~three ~~common stock~~categories: ~~held by Olsen for an aggregate purchase price of $2,488,745.~~

~~12. Related~~Level ~~Party~~1: ~~Transactions~~Fair values determined by quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

~~Leonard~~Level ~~Green~~2: &Fair ~~Partners (“LGP”),~~values autilize ~~firm~~inputs ~~that~~other ~~manages~~than ~~Green~~quoted ~~Equity~~prices ~~Investors~~that ~~II (“GEI”), Hancock Park Associates (“HPA”) and Leslie’s~~ are ~~parties~~observable tofor athe ~~Management~~asset ~~Agreement~~or ~~dated June 11~~liability, ~~1997.~~and ~~The Management Agreement provides that~~may ~~Leslie’s~~include ~~will~~quoted ~~pay~~prices ~~LGP an annual fee of $244,800~~ for ~~ongoing~~similar ~~management,~~assets ~~consulting~~ and ~~financial~~liabilities ~~services. In addition, subject to certain approval requirements, the Management Agreement provides that either LGP or HPA may provide financial advisory or investment banking services for Leslie’s~~ in ~~connection~~active ~~with major financial transactions~~markets, and ~~LGP~~inputs orother ~~HPA~~than ~~will~~quoted beprices ~~paid~~that aare ~~reasonable~~observable ~~fee~~ for ~~such services. The Management Agreement terminates on~~ the ~~earlier~~asset ~~of the tenth anniversary of its execution~~ or ~~the date that LGP affiliates hold 25% or less of the shares of Leslie’s that they held on the date of the Management Agreement~~liability.

~~During~~Level ~~the~~3: ~~fiscal~~Unobservable ~~years~~inputs ~~ended~~that ~~October~~are 2,not ~~2004,~~corroborated ~~September~~by ~~27,~~market ~~2003,~~data and ~~September~~may ~~28,~~reflect ~~2002,~~ the ~~Company~~reporting ~~paid~~entity’s ~~management~~own ~~fees~~assumptions tomarket ~~LGP~~participants inwould ~~the~~use ~~amount~~in ~~of $245,000~~pricing ~~for each of~~ the ~~three~~asset ~~years~~or ~~represented~~liability.

The fair value of short-term investments was determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1). As of October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008, amortized cost of the Company’s short-term investments equaled fair value. Accordingly, there were no unrealized gains and losses as of October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008.

There were no sale of available-for-sale securities for the years ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007.

The Company’s short-term investments consisted of the following October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008:


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	October 3, 2009		September 27, 2008
U.S. government and agency debt securities	$	—	$	19,899

Total short-term investments	$	—	$	19,899

At October 3, 2009, all of the Company’s U.S. government and agency debt securities mature within fiscal year 2010.

~~Leslie’s~~Notes ~~Poolmart,~~to ~~Inc.~~Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

~~Notes~~4. toInventories ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~13.~~Inventories ~~Stock~~consist ~~Based~~of ~~Compensation~~the ~~Plans~~following:

During 1997, the Company adopted a non-qualified common stock option plan (the “NQ Option Plan”) and an incentive common stock option plan (the “ISO Option Plan”) and reserved 417,995 shares and 1,369,730 shares, respectively, of Leslie’s common stock for issuance upon the exercise of options to be granted to certain employees of Leslie’s thereunder. Options to purchase Leslie’s common stock have been granted at an exercise price of $1.00 per share for options granted under the NQ Option Plan (“NQ Options”) and $2.00 per share in the case of options granted under the ISO Option Plan.


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	October 3, 2009		September 27, 2008
Raw materials and supplies	$	1,411	$	4,579
Finished goods		67,523		82,005

Total inventories	$	68,934	$	86,584

~~NQ Options are all vested~~5. NQProperty, ~~Options~~Plant ~~have a term of ten years~~ and ~~remain exercisable~~Equipment ~~without regard to any termination of employment of the holder.~~

~~Under the ISO Plan~~Property, asplant ~~amended, ISO Options vest in one-third increments on the first, second~~ and ~~third~~equipment ~~anniversaries~~consists of the ~~original~~following: grant date. Options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” and options not intended to so qualify may be granted under the ISO Option Plan. Pursuant to law, options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” are subject to limitations on aggregate amounts granted and must be issued to any holder of 10% or more of the issuer’s outstanding common stock at 110% of fair market value. Vested ISO Options may be exercised for 90 days post termination of employment, except in the case of the death of the option holder, in which case the vested portion may be exercised within twelve months from the date of termination. ISO Options have a term of ten years.

In November 1998, Leslie’s Board adopted its 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”), and reserved 300,000 shares of nonvoting common stock for issuance thereunder. In January 2000, the Board approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of shares of nonvoting common stock issuable thereunder to 500,000 shares in the aggregate.


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	October 3, 2009			September 27, 2008
Land	$	5,865		$	5,865
Buildings		8,313			8,058
Vehicles, machinery and equipment		8,405			7,510
Aircraft		13,200			4,876
Leasehold improvements		74,006			69,634
Office furniture, equipment and other		49,905			48,209
Construction-in-process		645			531

		160,339			144,683
Less—accumulated deprecation and amortization		(111,628	)		(102,609	)

Total property, plant and equipment	$	48,711		$	42,074

On February 15, 2001, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to effectuate the “repricing” of options outstanding under the Company’s ISO Option Plan and the 1998 Plan. Under the program, 198,500 existing options were cancelled and holders thereof were entitled to receive new Options on a date which would be at least 6 ~~months and a day from the date of cancellation, at a price equal to the then market value of the Company’s stock~~. ~~The~~Accrued ~~options~~expenses ~~cancelled had exercise prices that were higher than the Board’s view of the then current market price of the Company’s stock and had impaired the ability of such options to fulfill their purpose.~~

OnAccrued ~~February~~expenses ~~15,~~consist ~~2001, the Board~~ of ~~Directors approved a resolution to amend~~ the ~~Company’s~~following: Certificate of Incorporation to effectuate a 5 for 1 stock split whereby each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, was converted into five shares of common stock. Following approval by the Company’s stockholders, an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation was filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 22, 2001.

We account for stock-based compensation plans under APB Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation expense has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for stock-based employee awards with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. For purposes of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the fair value of each option granted has been estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants for each of the fiscal years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002: risk free interest rate 4.0%, expected volatility of 0%; expected lives of 7 years and no expected dividend yield. Based on these assumptions, the weighted average fair value of the options granted is $1.42 in 2004, $0.49 in 2003 and in 2002, respectively.


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	October 3, 2009		September 27, 2008
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	$	10,426	$	8,494
Self insurance reserves		8,569		8,350
All other current liabilities		21,520		20,137

Total accrued expenses	$	40,515	$	36,981

7. Loan and Security Agreement/Assets Subject to Lien

On September 30, 2009 the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with the lenders noted therein and Wells Fargo Retail Finance LLC as agent for the lenders. The Loan Agreement provides for the extension by the lenders of revolving loans and other financial accommodations in an aggregate principal amount of $50.0 million, which may be increased to a maximum of $75.0 million upon request of the borrowers and subject to agreement by existing or new lenders to undertake the incremental lending commitment. The Loan Agreement was and will be used to refinance the existing credit facility and for general corporate purposes. A portion of the Loan Agreement is available for letters of credit. The obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets.

~~Leslie’s~~Notes ~~Poolmart,~~to ~~Inc.~~Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

~~Notes~~Borrowings under the Loan Agreement bear interest at the lender’s Base Rate (as defined in the Loan Agreement) or at the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Loan Agreement), in each case plus the applicable margin rate. The applicable margin rate will be adjusted quarterly based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement). The applicable margin for the Loan Agreement is initially 2.25% with respect to ~~Consolidated~~Base ~~Financial~~Rate ~~Statements~~loans and 3.25% with respect to Eurodollar Rate loans.

AIn ~~summary~~addition, the Company is obligated to pay the lender a commitment fee equal to 0.50% per annum of ~~option~~the ~~activities~~average availability for ~~all~~any ~~plans~~quarter in which the average availability was less than 50%, and equal to 0.75% per annum for any quarter where the average availability was 50% or more, payable quarterly in arrears; the fee currently applicable is 0.75% per annum. The Company is also obligated to pay a commission on all outstanding letters of credit as ~~follows:~~well as customary administrative, issuance, fronting, amendment, payment and negotiation fees.

	Fiscal 2004				Fiscal 2003				Fiscal 2002
	Shares		Wt. Avg. Ex Price		Shares		Wt. Avg. Ex Price		Shares		Wt. Avg. Ex Price
Outstanding at beginning of year	1,456,060		$	1.97	1,841,330		$	1.77	1,683,830		$	1.75
Granted	190,200			5.80	15,000			2.00	220,000			2.00
Exercised	—			—	(390,270	)		1.04	(8,333	)		2.00
Cancelled	(17,500	)		2.00	(10,000	)		2.00	(54,167	)		2.00
Outstanding at end of year	1,628,760		$	2.42	1,456,060		$	1.97	1,841,330		$	1.77
Exercisable at end of year	1,385,054		$	1.97	1,226,605		$	1.97	1,278,270		$	1.67

The Loan Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, covenants and conditions to borrowing. There can be no assurance that the conditions to borrowing under the Loan Agreement will be satisfied.

The ~~following~~Loan ~~table~~Agreement requires the maintenance of certain quarterly financial and operating ratios and covenants, including minimum calculated ~~summarizes~~EBITDA ~~information~~levels, ~~about~~fixed ~~all~~charge ~~stock~~coverage ~~options~~ratio, ~~outstanding~~and asleverage ratio. Also, the Loan Agreement contains customary events of ~~October~~default, 2including default upon the nonpayment of principal, ~~2004:~~interest, fees or other amounts or the occurrence of a change of control.

	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Number Outstanding	Weighted Avg.RemainingContractual Life	WeighedAvg. Exercise Price		NumberExercisable	Weighted Avg. Exercise Price
$1.00	42,725	2.7	$	1.00	42,725	$	1.00
$2.00	1,395,835	7.0	$	2.00	1,342,329	$	2.00
$5.80	190,200	9.2	$	5.80	—	$	5.80
	1,628,760	7.1	$	2.42	1,385,054	$	1.97

No amounts are outstanding on the Loan Agreement as of October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008.

~~14.~~To ~~Supplemental~~the ~~Cash~~Company’s ~~Flow Disclosures~~knowledge, no event of default has occurred under the Loan Agreement.

~~The Company paid interest charges of $7~~8.~~0 million,~~ ~~$9.9~~Senior ~~million,~~Notes and $10.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company paid income taxes of $11.9 million, $5.6 million and $3.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Preferred Stock dividends and the accretion of the Warrants are excluded from the statement of cash flows as non-cash transactions.

On January 25, 2005, the Company sold, through a private placement exempt from the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, $170 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.75% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “Notes”). Interest-only payments on the Notes are payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning with August 1, 2005. The Notes were sold in the United States only to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to non-U.S. persons in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes were not registered under the Securities Act and can not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. The Company used the net proceeds of this offering to finance the 2005 Recapitalization and to redeem $59.5 million of its 10.375% Senior Notes due 2008. In connection with the closing of the private placement, the Company entered into (i) an indenture, dated January 25, 2005 with The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as the trustee, governing the terms and conditions of the Notes (the “Indenture”) and (ii) a registration rights agreement, dated January 25, 2005 with the initial purchasers of the Notes in the private placement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). The Notes were issued at a discount which is being amortized to interest expense and consist of the following:


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	October 3, 2009			September 27, 2008
Senior notes	$	170,000		$	170,000
Unamortized discount		(595	)		(768	)
Notes redeemed		(6,162	)		(2,232	)

Total Senior notes, net	$	163,243		$	167,000

Under the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company agreed to use its best efforts to register notes having substantially identical terms as the Notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an

~~ITEM~~Notes 9.to ~~CHANGES~~Consolidated INFinancial ~~AND~~Statements ~~DISAGREEMENTS~~(continued) ~~WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.~~

~~None~~ offer to exchange freely tradeable exchange notes for the Notes initially issued under the Indenture. The Company filed a registration statement for the exchange notes with the Commission on April 22, 2005 and caused such registration statement for the 7.75% Senior Notes, Series B, due 2013, to be declared effective June 16, 2005. The Indenture contains customary covenants, including those that will limit the Company’s ability to grant liens on assets to secure debt, enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions, and merge or consolidate with another company or sell substantially all assets. To the Company’s knowledge, no event of default has occurred under the Indenture.

~~ITEM 9a~~9. ~~CONTROLS~~Leases ~~AND PROCEDURES~~

~~Under~~The ~~the~~Company ~~supervision~~leases ~~and~~certain ~~with the participation of our management~~store, ~~including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer~~office, wedistribution ~~conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design~~ and ~~operation~~manufacturing offacilities ~~our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)~~ under ~~the~~operating ~~Securities~~leases ~~Exchange~~which ~~Act~~expire ofat ~~1934,~~various asdates ~~amended,~~through ~~as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”)~~2018. ~~Based~~Lease onagreements ~~this~~generally ~~evaluation,~~provide ~~our~~for increases ~~principal~~related ~~executive~~to ~~officer~~cost ~~and principal financial officer concluded as~~ of ~~the~~living ~~Evaluation~~indices ~~date that our disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures~~require ~~were effective such that~~ the ~~material~~Company ~~information relating~~ to ~~Leslie’s~~pay ~~including~~for ~~our~~property ~~consolidated subsidiaries~~taxes, ~~required~~repairs ~~to be disclosed in our Securities~~ and ~~Exchange~~insurance. ~~Commission~~Future ~~(“SEC”)~~annual ~~reports~~minimum islease ~~recorded,~~payments ~~processed,~~at ~~summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms~~October 3, ~~and~~2009 ~~was~~are ~~made~~as ~~known~~follows: ~~to our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer during the period when this report was being prepared to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.~~

In addition, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date. We have not identified any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore there were no corrective actions taken.


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*
2010	$	41,720
2011		34,807
2012		27,802
2013		19,328
2014		10,764
Thereafter		5,536

	$	139,957

Certain leases are renewable at the option of the Company for periods of one to ten years. Rent expense charged against income totaled $40.2 million, $38.4 million, and $35.9 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively. Only three leases provided for rent contingent on sales exceeding specific amounts.

10. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Fiscal 2009			Fiscal 2008			Fiscal 2007
Federal:
Current	$	23,803		$	22,233		$	16,899
Deferred (benefit)		(330	)		(314	)		1,517

	$	23,473		$	21,919		$	18,416

State:
Current	$	4,714		$	4,170		$	3,963
Deferred (benefit)		(65	)		(60	)		356

		4,649			4,110			4,319

Total	$	28,122		$	26,029		$	22,735

~~PART~~Notes ~~III~~to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

~~ITEM~~A ~~10.~~reconciliation ~~DIRECTORS~~of ~~AND~~the ~~EXECUTIVE~~provision ~~OFFICERS~~for OFincome ~~THE~~taxes ~~REGISTRANT~~to the amount computed at the federal statutory rate is as follows:

The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:


*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Fiscal 2009			Fiscal 2008		Fiscal 2007
Federal income tax at statutory rate	$	26,025		$	23,277	$	19,236
Permanent differences		103			67		617
State taxes, net of federal benefit		3,142			2,662		2,898
Reversal of tax position		(1,255	)		—		—
Other		107			23		(16	)

	$	28,122		$	26,029	$	22,735

Name	Age	Positions
Lawrence H. Hayward	50	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Donald J. Anderson	44	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Edward C. Agnew	65	Director
John M. Baumer	37	Director
John G. Danhakl.	48	Director
Michael J. Fourticq	60	Director
Ted C. Nark	46	Director
Michael L. Hatch	51	Senior Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing
Janet I. McDonald	46	Vice President, Chief Information Officer
Marvin D. Schutz	55	Senior Vice President, Store Operations

The tax effect of temporary differences, which give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax asset, are summarized below.

Lawrence H. Hayward is Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer. He joined the Company in January 2000 as President and Chief Executive Officer and assumed the additional role of Chairman of the Board in September 2000. Most recently, Mr. Hayward was the President of ABCO Desert Markets located in Phoenix, Arizona. From 1995 until 1999, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carr Gottstein Foods Co., Alaska’s largest food and drug retailer and wholesale provider. From 1990 to 1995, Mr. Hayward held other senior level positions at Buttrey Food and Drug Co. From 1981 until 1990 he served in various corporate positions at American Stores Company headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah.


	Fiscal 2009				Fiscal 2008
*(Dollar amounts in thousands)*	Deferred Tax Assets		Deferred Tax Liabilities		Deferred Tax Assets		Deferred Tax Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment	$	6,073	$	—	$	5,234	$	—
Inventory		1,473		—		1,908		—
Reserves and other accruals		2,296		—		2,221		—
Deferred rent		1,232		—		1,359		—
Compensation accruals		468		—		425		—

	$	11,542	$	—	$	11,147	$	—

~~Donald~~The J.Company, ~~Anderson~~either isthrough ~~Executive~~Holdings, ~~Vice~~or ~~President,~~prior ~~Chief~~to ~~Financial~~the ~~Officer~~2007 ~~and~~Reorganization, on its own ~~Director~~files ofincome tax returns in the ~~Company.~~United HeStates ~~joined~~federal ~~the~~jurisdiction ~~Company~~and invarious ~~May~~state ~~2000~~jurisdictions. ~~Mr.~~Our ~~Anderson~~income ~~has~~tax 28returns ~~years~~are ofaudited ~~experience~~by infederal ~~various~~and ~~retail~~state ~~industries~~tax authorities. ~~Most~~We ~~recently,~~are ~~Mr.~~currently ~~Anderson~~under ~~was~~examination ~~Senior~~by ~~Vice~~the ~~President~~Internal ~~and~~Revenue ~~Chief~~Service ~~Financial~~for ~~Officer~~the 2007 oftax ~~the~~year. ~~Follett~~There ~~Higher~~are ~~Education Group,~~differing ~~located~~interpretations inof ~~Oakbrook,~~tax ~~Illinois~~laws and regulations, ~~the~~and ~~nation’s~~as ~~largest~~a ~~operator~~result, ofsignificant ~~University~~disputes ~~bookstores.~~may ~~From~~arise ~~1995~~with ~~until~~these ~~1999,~~tax heauthorities ~~served~~involving asissues ~~Senior~~of ~~Vice~~the ~~President~~timing and ~~Chief~~amount ~~Financial~~of ~~Officer~~deductions and allocations of ~~Carr~~income ~~Gottstein~~among various ~~Foods~~tax Cojurisdictions., ~~Alaska’s~~While ~~largest~~we ~~food~~believe ~~and~~our ~~drug retailer~~positions ~~and~~comply ~~wholesale~~with ~~provider.~~applicable ~~From~~laws, ~~1990~~we toperiodically ~~1995,~~evaluate ~~Mr.~~exposures ~~Anderson~~associated ~~held~~with ~~various~~our ~~senior~~tax ~~level~~filing positions. atWith ~~Buttrey~~few ~~Food~~exceptions, ~~and~~the ~~Drug~~Company ~~Co.~~is ~~From~~no ~~1977~~longer subject to ~~1990,~~U.S. hefederal ~~served~~and instate examinations ~~various~~by ~~managerial~~taxing ~~positions~~authorities ~~with~~for ~~American~~years ~~Stores~~before ~~Company~~2006.

~~Edward~~In C.June ~~Agnew~~2006, ~~became~~authoritative aguidance ~~director~~was inissued ~~December~~prescribing ~~2002. He is~~ a ~~former retail~~ ~~executive~~comprehensive ~~with~~model ~~over~~for ~~36 years of retail experience. Mr. Agnew held various officer level assignments with Jewel Companies~~recognizing, ~~Inc.~~measuring, ~~Buttrey Food and Drug~~presenting, ~~Inc.,~~ and ~~American~~disclosing ~~Stores/Albertsons,~~in ~~Inc.~~the ~~Mr.~~financial ~~Agnew~~statements ~~began~~uncertain ~~his~~tax ~~career~~positions inthat ~~1963~~the ~~with~~company ~~Jewel~~has ~~Food &~~taken ~~Drug~~or ~~Stores~~expects ~~where~~to hetake ~~served~~ in ~~various capacities including General Manager of~~ its ~~Midwest~~tax ~~Division~~returns. InThe ~~1987~~Company ~~Mr.~~adopted ~~Agnew~~this ~~was~~guidance ~~appointed~~effective September 30, ~~President~~2007. ~~and~~The ~~Chief~~gross ~~Executive~~amount ~~Officer~~ of ~~Buttrey~~unrecognized ~~Food~~tax ~~and~~benefit ~~Drug~~at October 3, ~~Inc.~~2009 Inis ~~1990~~$213,000 ~~Mr. Agnew successfully led a leveraged buyout~~ of ~~Buttrey~~which ~~Food~~approximately ~~and~~$8,000 ~~Drug~~would ~~Company~~impact ~~and successfully completed an initial public offering of~~ the Company’s ineffective ~~early~~tax ~~1993.~~rate Inwere ~~1994~~it ~~Mr. Agnew returned~~ to ~~American~~be ~~Stores, Inc~~recognized., ~~where~~The hefollowing ~~served~~table assummarizes athe activity ~~Senior~~related ~~Vice~~to ~~President and member of~~ the Company’s ~~Executive~~unrecognized ~~Committee~~tax ~~until~~benefits ~~his~~(dollars ~~retirement~~ in ~~1999.~~thousands):

Ted C. Nark became a director of the Company in November of 2004. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of White Cap Industries, Inc. since April 2002. From 1998 until 2002, Mr. Nark was the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Corporate Express Australia, a publicly traded, business-to-business office products distribution company in Australia. From 1992 until 1998, Mr. Nark worked for Corporate Express, Inc., as Northwest Division President (from 1992 until 1995) and then as Group President (from 1995 until 1998).


Balance at September 27, 2008	$	1,370
Reductions for positions of prior years		(1,147	)
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations		(10	)

Balance at October 3, 2009	$	213

~~John M.~~The ~~Baumer~~Company ~~became~~recognizes ainterest ~~director~~and ofpenalties ~~the~~related ~~Company~~to uncertain tax benefits in the ~~November~~income ~~2001~~tax provision. HeThe ~~has~~Company ~~been~~had anapproximately ~~executive~~$35,000 ~~officer~~and $210,000 of accrued interest and ~~equity~~penalties at October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.

~~owner~~Notes ofto ~~Leonard~~Consolidated ~~Green~~Financial &Statements ~~Partners, L.P.~~ (~~“LGP”~~continued), the firm that manages Green Equity Investors II (“GEI”), since 1999. Mr. Baumer had previously been a Vice President at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation (“DLJ”), and had been with DLJ since 1995. Prior to joining DLJ, Mr. Baumer was at Fidelity Investments and Arthur Andersen. Mr. Baumer is also a director of FTD, Inc., Intercontinental Art, Inc., Phoenix Scientific, Inc., Rand McNally & Co. and VCA Antech, Inc.

~~John~~It G.is ~~Danhakl~~reasonably ~~became~~possible athat ~~director of~~ the ~~Company~~amount ~~in June 1997. He has been an executive officer and an equity owner~~ of ~~LGP,~~ the ~~firm~~unrecognized ~~that~~tax ~~manages~~benefit ~~GEI, since 1995. Mr. Danhakl had previously been a Managing Director at DLJ and had been~~ with ~~DLJ since 1990. Prior~~ respect to ~~joining~~certain ~~DLJ, Mr. Danhakl was a Vice President at Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated. Mr. Danhakl is also a director~~ of ~~Rite~~our ~~Aid~~unrecognized ~~Corporation,~~tax ~~Arden~~positions ~~Group,~~will ~~Inc.,~~increase ~~Big~~or 5decrease ~~Sporting~~during ~~Goods~~the ~~Corp.,~~next ~~Communications~~12 ~~& Power Industries~~months, ~~Inc.~~however, ~~Liberty~~we ~~Group~~do ~~Operating,~~not ~~Inc.,~~expect ~~Petco~~any ~~Animal~~potential ~~Supplies,~~change ~~Inc.,~~to ~~Phoenix~~have ~~Scientific,~~a ~~Inc.,~~material ~~MEMC~~effect ~~Electronic~~on ~~Materials,~~our ~~Inc., Diamond~~results ~~Triumph~~of ~~Auto~~operations ~~Glass,~~or ~~Inc.,~~our ~~and~~financial ~~VCA Antech, Inc~~position.

~~Michael J~~11. ~~Fourticq~~Contingencies is a director of the Company. He also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors from May 1988 until January 2000. Between May 1988 and August 1992, he served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Fourticq had been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brown Jordan International, a leading manufacturer of outdoor and casual furniture products. Since 1985 he has been the sole general partner of Hancock Park Associates, which is the general partner and affiliate of several investment partnerships. Mr. Fourticq is also on the Boards of Mikol Missile-Air, Brown Jordan International, Gordon Biersch, FHI dba Body Home Fitness, The Right Start, Classic Party Rentals, Stanton International and Saleen, Inc.

~~Michael~~The Company L.is ~~Hatch~~a ~~has~~defendant ~~been Senior~~in ~~Vice~~lawsuits ~~President,~~or ~~Merchandising~~potential ~~and~~claims ~~Marketing~~encountered ofin the ~~Company~~normal ~~since~~course ~~November 2000. Mr. Hatch has more than 29 years~~ of ~~experience~~business; insuch ~~the~~matters ~~retail~~are ~~industry.~~being ~~Most~~vigorously ~~recently, Mr~~defended. ~~Hatch~~In ~~was~~ the ~~President~~opinion of ~~ABCO Desert Markets~~management, ~~located~~the inresolutions ~~Phoenix, Arizona. From 1996 to 1999 he was employed by Smiths Food and Drug where he held various positions including Senior Vice President and Southwest Manager and Vice President~~ of ~~Sales,~~these ~~Merchandising~~matters ~~and~~will ~~Marketing.~~not ~~From~~have ~~1970~~a tomaterial ~~1996,~~effect ~~Mr.~~on ~~Hatch held~~the ~~various senior management positions at Smitty~~Company’s ~~Super~~financial ~~Valu,~~position ~~Inc.~~or ~~located~~results inof ~~Phoenix, Arizona, which later merged with Smith’s Food and Drug~~operations.

~~Janet~~The I.Company’s ~~McDonald~~workers’ iscompensation ~~Senior~~insurance ~~Vice President~~program, general ~~Chief~~liability ~~Information~~insurance ~~Officer~~program ofand ~~the~~employee ~~Company.~~group ~~She~~medical ~~joined~~plan ~~the~~has ~~Company~~self-insurance inretention ~~August~~features of ~~2000~~$0.3 Msmillion, $0.3 ~~McDonald~~million ~~has~~and ~~over~~$0.2 million ~~28 years~~per ofincident, ~~retail experience~~respectively. ~~Most~~As ~~recently~~of ~~Ms.~~October 3, ~~McDonald~~2009 ~~owned~~ and ~~operated her own consulting business where she provided project management~~September 27, ~~management training~~2008, ~~marketing,~~the Company ~~economic~~had ~~and~~standby ~~other~~letters ~~business~~of ~~services.~~credit ~~From~~outstanding ~~1990~~in tothe ~~1992~~amounts ~~she~~of ~~served~~$4.3 ~~as Director~~million ~~Information Technology for Buttrey Food~~ and ~~Drug Company~~$5.7 ~~From~~million, ~~1981~~respectively, ~~to1990~~for ~~she~~the ~~held~~purpose ~~progressive levels~~ of ~~management~~securing ~~responsibility~~such inobligations ~~corporate~~under ~~technology~~its ~~for~~workers’ ~~American~~compensation ~~Stores~~self ~~Company~~insurance programs.

~~Marvin D~~12. ~~Schutz~~401(k) ~~has~~Plan been Senior Vice President, Store Operations, since July 1999. From May 1997 through June 1999, he was Vice President of Store Operations. From October 1994 through May 1997, he was Director of Store Operations, Eastern Division. From 1982 through 1993 he held several management positions in specialty retail at Montgomery Ward as National Director of Operations and Training and Silo Inc. as Regional Sales Manager and Director of Operations.

~~All~~The Company ~~executive~~provides ~~officers~~for the benefit of its employees a voluntary retirement plan under Section 401(k) of the ~~Company~~Internal ~~are~~Revenue ~~chosen~~Code. byDuring 2009, the ~~Board~~plan ofcovered ~~Directors~~all eligible employees and ~~serve~~provided atfor a matching contribution by the ~~Board~~Company of 50% of each participant’s ~~discretion~~contribution ~~except~~up asto ~~provided~~4% inof the ~~employment agreements~~individual’s ~~described~~compensation ~~below~~as ~~under~~defined. ~~“Executive~~The ~~Compensation~~expenses –related ~~Employment~~to ~~Agreements”~~this program were $0.6 Nomillion, ~~family~~$0.6 ~~relationships~~million ~~exist~~and ~~between~~$0.6 ~~any~~million offor ~~the~~fiscal ~~officers~~years or2009, ~~directors~~2008 ofand ~~the~~2007 ~~Company~~respectively.

~~Leslie’s, GEI, the members of HPA Group, Occidental Petroleum Corporation and the holders of certain management options are parties to a Stockholders Agreement~~13. InEquity ~~the~~Transactions ~~Stockholders Agreement, Michael Fourticq was given certain rights to be elected as a director of the Company.~~

~~The~~Preferred ~~Board of Directors of Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. does not have a “financial expert” within the meaning of the regulations of the Securities~~ and ~~Exchange~~Common ~~Commission,~~Stock ~~and we are not required to do so. We do not believe that we could recruit a financial expert without unwarranted expense and difficulty.~~

The Company ~~has~~became ~~adopted~~a subsidiary of Holdings pursuant to the 2007 Reorganization. As a ~~Code~~result of ~~Ethics~~the 2007 Reorganization, each share of outstanding common stock of the Company was converted into one share of common stock of Holdings, and aeach ~~copy~~share ~~may~~of beoutstanding ~~obtained~~10% onsenior ~~written~~redeemable ~~request~~exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of the Company was converted into one share of 10% senior redeemable exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of Holdings with the same rights, privileges, and preferences, including as to liquidation. The conversion of the 10% senior redeemable exchangeable cumulative preferred stock of the Company ~~attention:~~for ~~Corporate~~similar stock of Holdings was accounted for as contributed capital to the Company, given that the assumption of the obligation by Holdings without recourse to the Company had the ~~Secretary~~effect of extinguishing the rights of the preferred stockholders and the resulting obligation. In fiscal 2009, the preferred shares were exchanged into junior subordinated notes with an 11% interest rate, due in 2019.

14. Related Party Transactions

The Company currently has a Management Services Agreement with Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. (“LGP”). The Management Services Agreement provides that the Company will pay LGP an annual fee of $1.0 million for ongoing management, consulting and financial services. In addition, the Management Services Agreement provides that LGP may provide the Company with financial advisory or investment banking services in connection with major financial transactions, and LGP will be paid a customary fee for such services. The Management Services Agreement will terminate on the earlier of (a) the tenth anniversary of its execution dated January 25, 2005; provided that the agreement will automatically extend for one year periods thereafter unless either the Company or LGP gives the other three months prior notice of termination, (b) the consummation of a change of control, including the date that LGP affiliates hold 40% or less of the Company’s shares and (c) the consummation of a public offering of the Company’s common stock in an aggregate offering amount of at least $50 million or as a result of which at least 15% of the Company’s shares of common stock is publicly traded. In the event of the Company’s bankruptcy, liquidation, insolvency or winding-up, the payment of all accrued and

~~ITEM~~Notes ~~11.~~to ~~EXECUTIVE~~Consolidated ~~COMPENSATION~~Financial Statements (continued)

~~Summary~~ ~~Compensation~~unpaid ~~Table~~fees pursuant to the Management Services Agreement is subordinated to the prior payment in full of all amounts due and owing under the indenture governing the notes.

~~The~~During ~~following summary compensation table sets forth for~~ the fiscal years ended October 2 3, ~~2004~~2009, September 27, ~~2003,~~2008 and September 28 29, ~~2002~~2007, ~~respectively,~~ the ~~compensation for services to the~~ Company ofpaid ~~the~~management ~~Chief~~fees ~~Executive~~to LGP ~~Officer~~in ~~and~~ the ~~four~~amount ~~most highly compensated executive officers~~ of ~~the~~$1.0 ~~Company~~million, as$1.0 ofmillion ~~October~~and 2,$1.0 ~~2004~~million respectively.

		Fiscal Year Compensation		Long-Term Compensation	All Other Compensation
	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)(1)	Stock Options (#)(2)	401(k) ($)(3)	Insurance/Other ($)(4)
Lawrence H. Hayward Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director	200420032002	459,327425,000417,308	463,118386,750365,925	60,000— 30,000	4,0004,0003,400	46,18642,628180
Donald J. Anderson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director	200420032002	324,231300,000292,308	223,505195,000183,250	30,000— 20,000	4,0004,0003,400	28,23724,148120
Michael L. Hatch Senior Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing	200420032002	201,794189,000186,292	98,74185,99581,817	5,000— 10,000	4,0003,7742,250	1,517250180
Janet I. McDonald Vice President, Chief Information Officer	200420032002	166,731147,473—	78,85460,085—	2,500— —	3,0002,786—	1,417180—
Marvin D. Schutz Senior Vice President, Store Operations	200420032002	190,995182,000179,779	93,38582,81078,792	1,250— 10,000	4,0004,0003,400	1,766516451

During February of 2007, the Company’s parent, Holdings consummated a privately placed financing transaction. The Company does not guarantee or pledge support for this financing, nor were any of the proceeds made available to the Company, and therefore, the Company’s financial statements do not reflect the debt and its related costs. Holdings issued $310 million in senior notes due in 2017 and $100 million of preferred equity. The interest rate on the senior notes is 10.5% cash or 11.5% PIK, at Holdings’ option. The notes are non-callable for two years and have other covenants and terms that are customary for high yield issues. The preferred shares had a dividend rate of 11% and were exchangeable into debt under certain circumstances. In fiscal 2009, the preferred shares were exchanged into junior subordinated notes with an 11% interest rate, due in 2019. The Company is not required to service any obligation of Holdings and the sole source of funds that might be provided by the Company would be in the form of dividends to Holdings.

~~(1) Bonuses are attributed to the year earned, and are paid out after the conclusion of the fiscal year~~15. ~~Bonuses~~Stock ~~were~~Based ~~paid~~Compensation onPlans ~~a twelve-month basis for all of the fiscal years showing.~~

In August 2005, Leslie’s board of directors adopted its 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan (2the “2005 Plan”), ~~All~~and ~~options~~reserved 1,300,000 shares of nonvoting common stock for issuance thereunder. As of the 2007 Reorganization, the 2005 Plan and related agreements were ~~granted~~assumed atby ~~their~~Holdings. Any future grants of options subsequent to the 2007 Reorganization will be for equity of Holdings and not the Company. During the second quarter of 2007 and pursuant to the 2005 Plan, Holdings’ board of directors approved the acceleration of the vesting of all of the then outstanding stock options to purchase shares of common stock of Holdings. The fair ~~market~~value of the awards immediately before the modification of the vesting was the same value onas the ~~date~~fair value after the modification took effect. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recorded under accounting guidance related to the acceleration of ~~grant~~the options.

~~(3)~~All ~~Represents~~outstanding ~~expected~~options were exercised in February of 2007 after the 2007 Reorganization, which gave rise to a tax benefit of approximately $2.1 million attributed to the Company. ~~matching~~Given ~~contributions~~that the tax benefit meets the realization criteria of the applicable accounting guidance, the benefit has been recorded as a credit to equity ~~individuals’~~since ~~401(k)~~the ~~accounts~~entire benefit exceeded the recorded expense of zero. The Company did not otherwise grant or modify any share-based compensation during the 52 weeks ended September 29, 2007.

~~(4)~~In ~~Insurance~~fiscal ~~portion~~2008, ~~represents~~the ~~premiums~~board ~~paid~~of bydirectors of Holdings approved grants of options to a number of key individuals of the Company. ~~for~~These ~~life~~options to ~~insurance~~purchase ~~not~~approximately ~~generally~~438,000 ~~available~~shares toof ~~all~~Holdings ~~Company~~common ~~employees~~stock vest over a five year period at a rate of 20% annually on each anniversary of the date of grant.

In fiscal 2009, the board of directors of Holdings approved grants of options to a number of key individuals of the Company. These options to purchase approximately 405,000 shares of Holdings common stock vest over a five year period at a rate of 20% annually on each anniversary of the date of grant.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which requires the use of a number of assumptions including expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, and expected term. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock. The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms and vesting schedules. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. We have not paid dividends in the past and do not plan to pay any dividends in the near future to ultimate shareholder who hold the type of security subject to the option arrangement. The accounting guidance also

~~Option~~Notes ~~Plans~~to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

~~During~~ requires ~~1997,~~us ~~the~~to ~~Company~~estimate ~~adopted~~forfeitures aat ~~non-qualified common stock option plan (~~the ~~“NQ~~time ~~Option~~of ~~Plan”)~~grant and anrevise ~~incentive~~these ~~common stock option plan (the “ISO Option Plan”) and reserved 417~~estimates,~~995~~ ~~shares~~if ~~and 1~~necessary,~~369,730~~ ~~shares,~~in ~~respectively,~~subsequent ofperiods ~~Leslie’s~~if ~~common~~actual ~~stock~~forfeitures ~~for~~differ ~~issuance~~from ~~upon~~those ~~the exercise of options to be granted to employees of Leslie’s thereunder~~estimates. ~~Options~~We toestimate ~~purchase common~~forfeitures ~~stock~~based ~~have~~on ~~been~~our ~~granted~~historical atexperience. anThe ~~exercise~~fair ~~price~~value of ~~$1.00~~stock ~~per share for~~ options granted ~~under~~was ~~the~~estimated NQat ~~Option~~the ~~Plan~~date ~~(“NQ~~of ~~Options”)~~grant ~~and~~using ~~$2.00 and $5.80 per share in~~ the ~~case~~Black-Scholes ofoption ~~options~~pricing ~~granted~~model ~~under~~with the ~~ISO~~following ~~Option~~weighted ~~Plan.~~average assumptions:

NQ Options are all vested. NQ Options have a term of ten years and remain exercisable without regard to any termination of employment of the holder.


	Fiscal 2009			Fiscal 2008			Fiscal 2007
Expected volatility		45.5	%		47.8	%	N/A
Risk-free interest rate		2.6	%		3.4	%	N/A
Dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%	N/A
Expected life (in years)		5.0			5.0		N/A
Weighted average fair value per option granted	$	1.25		$	1.05		N/A

~~Under~~As ~~the~~there ~~ISO~~were ~~Plan,~~no asgrants ~~amended, ISO Options vest~~ in ~~one-third~~fiscal ~~increments on the first~~2007, ~~second and third anniversaries of~~ the ~~original~~valuation ~~grant~~assumptions ~~date.~~are ~~Options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” and options~~ not ~~intended to so qualify may be granted under the ISO Option Plan~~applicable. ~~Pursuant to law, options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” are subject to limitations on aggregate amounts granted and must be issued to any holder~~ of 10% or more of the issuer’s outstanding common stock at 110% of fair market value. Vested ISO Options may be exercised for 90 days post termination of employment, except in the case of the death of the option holder, in which case the vested portion may be exercised within twelve months from the date of termination. ISO Options have a term of ten years.

InA ~~November~~summary ~~1998, Leslie’s Board adopted its 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”), and reserved 300,000 shares~~ of ~~nonvoting common~~option ~~stock~~activities for ~~issuance~~all ~~thereunder.~~plans Inis ~~January~~as ~~2000,~~follows: the Board approved an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of shares of nonvoting common stock issuable thereunder to 500,000 shares in the aggregate. Options to purchase Leslie’s nonvoting common stock have been granted at an exercise price of the fair market value at the time of such grant.

On February 15, 2001, the Board of Directors approved a resolution to effectuate the “repricing” of options outstanding under the Company’s ISO Option Plan and the 1998 Plan. Under the program, 198,500 existing options were cancelled and holders thereof were entitled to receive new Options on a date which would be at least 6 months and a day from the date of cancellation, at a price equal to the then market value of the Company’s stock. The options cancelled had exercise prices that were higher than the Board’s view of the then current market price of the Company’s stock and had impaired the ability of such options to fulfill their purpose.


	Fiscal 2009				Fiscal 2008			Fiscal 2007
	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year	438,000		$	2.30	—	$	—	1,233,500		$	1.91
Granted	405,000			2.90	438,000		2.30	—			—
Exercised	—			—	—		—	—			—
Cancelled	(9,000	)		2.30	—		—	—			—
Assigned to Leslie’s Holdings, Inc.	—			—	—		—	(1,233,500	)		1.91

Outstanding at end of year	834,000		$	2.59	438,000	$	2.30	—		$	—

Exercisable at end of year	86,300		$	2.30	—	$	—	—		$	—

OnIn ~~February~~fiscal ~~15,~~year ~~2001,~~2009 ~~the Board~~and of2008, ~~Directors approved a resolution to amend~~ the ~~Company’s~~fair ~~Certificate~~value of ~~Incorporation~~the tocommon ~~effectuate a 5 for 1~~ stock ~~split~~underlying ~~whereby~~the ~~each~~2005 Incentive ~~outstanding~~Stock ~~share~~Option ofPlan ~~the~~options ~~Company’s~~granted ~~common~~was ~~stock,~~determined ~~par~~to ~~value~~be $2.~~001~~90 ~~per~~and ~~share~~$2.30, ~~was~~respectively, ~~converted~~based ~~into five~~on ~~shares of common stock. Following approval by the Company~~management’s ~~stockholders,~~estimate of an ~~amendment~~enterprise tovalue ~~the Company’s Articles~~ of ~~Incorporation~~Holdings ~~was~~at ~~filed~~the ~~with~~time ~~the~~of ~~Delaware~~grant. ~~Secretary~~No ofoptions ~~State~~were ongranted ~~February~~in ~~22,~~fiscal ~~2001~~2007.

The total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 was approximately $91,000, $0 and $0, respectively.

The weighted average remaining contractual term of options outstanding and exercisable as of October 3, 2009 was 3.6 years and 3.1 years, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of October 3, 2009 was $0.3 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively. As of October 3, 2009, there was approximately $697,000 of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.6 years.

16. Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The Company paid interest charges of $13.0 million, $13.4 million and $13.6 million in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively. The Company paid income taxes of $28.6 million, $26.4 million and $20.5 million in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively. Income tax payments made subsequent to the 2007 Reorganization are made to Holdings given that the Company is included in the consolidated tax return for Holdings.

~~Option~~ITEM 9. ~~Grants~~CHANGES inIN ~~2004~~AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The following table sets forth the stock options granted to the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers of the Company, during the twelve months ended October 2, 2004, pursuant to the Company’s ISO Option Plan, or 1998 PlanNone.

	Individual Grants
	OptionsGranted(1)	% of TotalOptionsGranted toEmployees in Fiscal Year	Exercise or Base Price	Expiration Date	Potential Realizable Value at AssumedAnnual Rates of Stock PriceAppreciation for Option Term(2)
					0%($)	5%($)	10% ($)
Lawrence H. Hayward	60,000	31.6%	$5.80	11/21/13	—	219,000	554,400
Donald J. Anderson	30,000	15.8%	$5.80	11/21/13	—	109,500	277,200
Michael L. Hatch	5,000	2.6%	$5.80	10/1/13	—	18,250	46,200
Janet I. McDonald	2,500	1.3%	$5.80	10/1/13	—	9,125	23,100
Marvin D. Schutz	1,250	0.7%	$5.80	10/1/13	—	4,563	11,550

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~(1)~~Evaluation ~~Granted~~of Disclosure ~~pursuant~~Controls ~~to ISO Option Plan~~ and ~~1998~~Procedures ~~Plan. Options granted vest over a three-year period.~~

~~(2)~~Under ~~Potential~~the ~~realizable~~supervision ~~value~~and iswith ~~based~~the onparticipation anof ~~assumption~~the ~~that~~Company’s management, including the ~~stock~~Company’s ~~price~~principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the ~~common~~effectiveness ~~stock~~of ~~appreciates~~the atdesign and operation of the ~~annual~~Company’s ~~rate~~disclosure ~~shown~~controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(~~compounded~~e) and ~~annually~~15d-15(e) under ~~from~~ the ~~date~~Securities Exchange Act of ~~grant~~1934, ~~until~~as amended, as of the end of the ~~ten-year~~period ~~option~~covered ~~term.~~by ~~These~~this ~~numbers~~report ~~are~~(the ~~calculated~~“Evaluation ~~based~~Date”). Based on ~~requirements~~this ~~promulgated~~evaluation, bythe Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and doreported ~~not~~within ~~reflect~~the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and was made known to the Company’s ~~estimate~~principal ofexecutive ~~future~~officer ~~stock~~and ~~price~~principal ~~growth~~accounting officer during the period when this report was being prepared to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Aggregated~~Management’s ~~Option~~Report ~~Exercises~~on inInternal ~~2004~~Control ~~and~~over ~~Fiscal~~Financial ~~Year-End~~Reporting ~~Option Value~~

~~The~~We ~~following~~are ~~table~~responsible ~~sets~~for ~~forth~~establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in the ~~stock~~securities ~~option~~laws, internal ~~exercises~~control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the ~~named~~supervision of, our principal executive ~~officers~~and ~~during~~principal ~~2004.~~financial Inofficer ~~addition~~and effected by our Board of Directors, ~~the~~management, ~~table~~and ~~indicates~~other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the ~~total~~reliability ~~number~~of financial reporting and ~~value~~the preparation of ~~exercisable~~financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and ~~non-exercisable~~includes ~~options~~those ~~held~~policies byand procedures that (i) pertain ~~each~~to ~~such~~the ~~officer~~maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial ~~October~~statements 2in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, ~~2004~~and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

	SharesAcquired OnExercise (#)	Value Realized($)	Number of Unexercised Options at October 2, 2004		Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at October 2, 2004(1)
			Exercisable	Unexercisable	Exercisable		Unexercisable
Lawrence H. Hayward	—	—	332,500	70,000	$	1,263,500	$	38,000
Donald J. Anderson	—	—	250,834	36,666		953,169		25,331
Michael L. Hatch	—	—	95,833	6,667		364,165		6,335
Janet I. McDonald	—	—	58,333	6,667		221,665		15,835
Marvin D. Schutz	—	—	124,978	4,167		482,811		12,035

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 3, 2009 based on the criteria in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon this evaluation, we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 3, 2009.

~~(1)~~The ~~Potential~~annual ~~unrealized~~report ~~value~~on isinternal ~~(i)~~control ~~the~~over ~~fair~~financial ~~market~~reporting ~~value~~does atnot ~~October~~include 2,an attestation ~~2004~~report ~~($5.80~~of ~~per~~our ~~share)less~~independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the ~~option~~SEC ~~exercise~~that ~~price~~permit ~~times~~us ~~(ii)~~to provide only management’s report in our annual report on Form 10-K for the ~~number~~year ofended ~~shares~~October 3, 2009.

~~Directors’~~Changes ~~Compensation~~in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~Directors~~In doaddition, ~~not~~there ~~receive~~were ~~any~~no ~~compensation~~changes ~~directly~~in ~~for their service on~~ the Company’s ~~Board~~internal ofcontrols ~~Directors,~~or with the exception of Mr. Agnew and Mr. Nark, our outside directors, who receives $4,000 per each quarterly meeting. The Company issued 15,000 options to Mr. Agnew and Mr. Nark, respectively. Pursuant to a Management Agreement dated June 11, 1997, Leslie’s pays LGP an annual fee for various management, consulting and financial planning services, including assistance in ~~strategic~~other ~~planning,~~factors ~~providing~~that ~~market~~could ~~and~~significantly ~~financial~~affect ~~analysis,~~these ~~negotiating and structuring financing and exploring~~controls ~~expansion~~subsequent ~~opportunities. The Management Agreement also provides that subject~~ to ~~specified~~the ~~approval~~Evaluation ~~requirements,~~Date. ~~either~~We ~~LGP~~have ornot ~~HPA~~identified ~~may~~any ~~provide~~significant ~~financial~~deficiencies ~~advisory~~ or ~~investment~~material ~~banking~~weaknesses ~~services for Leslie’s~~ in ~~connection with major financial transactions, and LGP or HPA will be paid a reasonable fee for such services. During 2004, Leslie’s paid LGP~~ the ~~annual fee in the amount of $244,800 plus out-of-pocket expenses of approximately $43,670. John M. Baumer and John D. Danhakl are members of the~~ Company’s ~~Board~~internal ofcontrols, ~~Directors~~ and ~~are~~therefore ~~executive~~there ~~officers~~were ~~and~~no ~~equity~~corrective ~~owners~~actions ~~of LGP~~taken.

~~Employment~~ITEM 9B. ~~Agreements~~OTHER INFORMATION

~~Lawrence~~Not ~~Hayward and Donald Anderson each entered into employment agreements with Leslie’s, dated as of November 2003~~applicable. Each of the employment agreements contains non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants and provides that the executive is eligible to participate in Leslie’s benefit plans consistent with the benefits extended to the most senior of Leslie’s executives (including vacation, personal and sick leave, disability, medical and life insurance). Each of the employment agreements also provides that the executive will serve at the will of the Company’s Board of Directors. Each of the employment agreements expires in November 2008.

Mr. Hayward’s employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $425,000 annually, plus a minimum target bonus of no less than $297,500. If Leslie’s terminates Mr. Hayward’s employment for any reason other than Just Cause (as defined in the Agreement), Mr. Hayward will receive a lump sum payment equal to 200% of the sum of his base salary, bonus and certain costs for health and medical insurance coverage. The benefits are also payable upon a sale of substantially all of the business or assets of the Company or a consolidation, merger or change of control of the Company (a “Change of Control”), if Mr. Hayward chooses to terminate his employment with the Company as a result of the Change in Control.

Mr. Anderson’s employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $300,000 annually, plus a minimum target bonus of no less than $150,000. If Leslie’s terminates Mr. Anderson’s employment for any reason other than Just Cause (as defined in the Agreement), Mr. Anderson will receive a lump sum payment equal to 200% of the sum of his base salary, bonus and certain costs for health and medical insurance coverage. The benefits are also payable upon a Change of Control (as defined above) if Mr. Anderson chooses to terminate his employment with the Company as the result of the Change in Control.

~~ITEM~~PART ~~12.~~III ~~PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT~~

The following table sets forth information as of October 2, 2004 with respect to (i) all persons known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock; (ii) all executive officers of the Company; (iii) all directors; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a groupITEM 10. ~~The~~DIRECTORS ~~address~~AND ~~for~~EXECUTIVE ~~the~~OFFICERS ~~directors~~OF ~~and~~THE ~~executive~~REGISTRANT ~~officers is in care of the Company.~~

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock(2)	Percentage ofSharesOutstanding(2)
Green Equity Investors II, L.P. (3)	6,104,525	60.7	%
John M. Baumer(3,4,5)	7,633,169	75.9
John G. Danhakl(3,4,5)	7,633,169	75.9
GCP California Fund(5)	1,528,644	15.2
Michael J. Fourticq	400,000	4.0
Lawrence H. Hayward(6)	602,500	6.0
Donald J. Anderson(7)	510,834	5.1
Michael L. Hatch(8)	95,833	1.0
Janet I. McDonald (8)	58,333	0.6
Marvin D. Schutz(8)	124,978	1.2
All executive officers and directors as a group (8 persons)	9,425,647	93.7	%

The directors, executive officers and significant employees of the Company are as follows:

(1) The address of Messrs. Fourticq, Hayward, Anderson, Hatch, McDonald, and Schutz is 3925 E. Broadway Road, Suite 100, Phoenix, Arizona 85040. The address of Green Equity Investors II, L.P. (“GEI”), Green Capital Partners, L.P. (“GCP”) and Messrs. Baumer and Danhakl is 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 90025.


Name	Age	Positions
Lawrence H. Hayward	55	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Steven L. Ortega	48	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Michael L. Hatch	56	President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
Edward C. Agnew	70	Director
John M. Baumer	42	Director
John G. Danhakl	53	Director
Michael J. Fourticq	65	Director
Rick D. Carlson	45	Senior Vice President, Commercial, Service and Logistics
Brian P. Agnew	44	Senior Vice President, Store Operations
Craig A. Wright	46	Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer

~~(2)~~Lawrence ~~Computed~~H. ~~based~~Hayward ~~upon~~is ~~the~~Chairman ~~total number~~ of ~~shares~~the Board of ~~Leslie’s~~Directors ~~common~~and ~~stock~~Chief ~~outstanding~~Executive Officer. ~~and~~He joined the ~~number~~Company ofin ~~shares~~January of2000 ~~Leslie’s~~as ~~common~~President ~~stock~~and ~~underlying~~Chief ~~warrants~~Executive Officer and ~~options~~assumed the additional role of ~~such~~Chairman ~~person~~of ~~exercisable~~the ~~within~~Board 60in ~~days~~September 2000. InMost ~~accordance~~recently, ~~with~~Mr. Hayward ~~Rule~~was ~~13(d)-3~~the President of ~~the~~ABCO ~~Exchange~~Desert ~~Act~~Markets located in Phoenix, ~~any~~Arizona. ~~Leslie’s~~From ~~common~~1995 ~~stock~~until ~~which~~1999, ishe ~~subject~~served toas ~~warrants~~President orand ~~options~~Chief ~~exercisable~~Executive ~~within~~Officer 60of ~~days~~Carr isGottstein ~~deemed~~Foods toCo., beAlaska’s ~~outstanding~~largest ~~for~~food ~~the~~and ~~purpose~~drug ofretailer ~~computing~~and ~~the~~wholesale ~~percentage~~provider. ofFrom ~~outstanding~~1990 ~~shares~~to of1995, ~~Leslie’s~~Mr. Hayward ~~common~~held ~~stock~~other ~~owned~~senior bylevel positions ~~the~~at ~~person~~Buttrey ~~holding~~Food ~~such~~and ~~warrants~~Drug orStore ~~options,~~Company. ~~but~~From is1981 ~~not~~until ~~deemed~~1990 tohe beserved ~~outstanding~~in ~~for~~various ~~the~~corporate ~~purpose~~positions ofat ~~computing~~American ~~the~~Stores ~~percentage~~Company ofheadquartered ~~outstanding~~in ~~shares~~Salt ofLake ~~Leslie’s~~City, ~~common~~Utah. ~~stock~~Mr. Hayward ~~owned~~is byalso ~~any~~a ~~other~~director ~~person~~of Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.

~~(3)~~Steven ~~GEI~~L. Ortega is aExecutive ~~Delaware~~Vice ~~limited partnership managed by LGP~~President, ~~which~~Chief isFinancial anOfficer ~~affiliate~~and Director of the ~~general~~Company ~~partner~~and ofjoined ~~GEI.~~the ~~Each~~Company ofin August, ~~Messrs~~2005. ~~Jonathan D~~Mr. Ortega ~~Sokoloff,~~served ~~Peter~~as J.Executive ~~Nolan,~~Vice ~~John~~President D.and ~~Danhakl,~~Chief ~~Jonathan~~Financial A.Officer ~~Seiffer,~~for ~~John~~BI-LO M.LLC ~~Baumer~~from ~~and~~1999 ~~James~~to D2005. ~~Halper,~~Prior ~~either~~to ~~directly~~joining ~~(whether~~BI-LO, ~~through~~Mr. Ortega ~~ownership~~was ~~interest~~with orAmerican ~~position)~~Stores ~~or through one of more intermediaries~~Company, ~~may~~where behe ~~deemed~~held tovarious ~~control~~positions ~~LGP~~within ~~and~~their supermarket ~~such general partner. LGP~~ and ~~such~~drug ~~general~~store ~~partner~~subsidiaries, ~~may~~including beVice ~~deemed~~President—Finance toand ~~control~~Administration, ~~the voting~~ and ~~disposition~~Vice ofPresident—Logistics. ~~the~~Prior ~~shares~~to ofthis ~~Leslie’s~~period ~~common~~at ~~stock~~American ~~owned~~Stores, ~~by GEI~~Mr. Ortega ~~Accordingly,~~held ~~for~~various ~~certain~~management ~~purposes,~~positions ~~Messrs.~~in ~~Sokoloff~~finance, ~~Nolan~~accounting, audit ~~Danhakl, Seiffer, Baumer~~ and ~~Halper~~store ~~may~~operations beat ~~deemed~~Lucky toStores, beInc., ~~beneficial~~where ~~owners~~he oflast held the ~~shares~~position of ~~Leslie’s~~Director ~~common~~of ~~stock~~Finance ~~held~~and ~~by GEI~~Accounting.

~~(4)~~Michael ~~Includes~~L. Hatch has been President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of the ~~shares~~Company ~~beneficially~~since ~~owned~~September by2006. ~~GEI~~Prior to that, Mr. Hatch served as Senior Vice President, Merchandising and ~~GCP~~Marketing of the Company since November 2000. Mr. Hatch has more than 30 years of experience in the retail industry. Most recently, Mr. Hatch was the President of ~~which~~ABCO ~~Messrs~~Desert Markets, located in Phoenix, Arizona. ~~Baumer~~From 1996 to 1999 he was employed by Smiths Food and ~~Danhakl~~Drug ~~are~~where ~~associates~~he held various positions including Senior Vice President and Southwest Manager and Vice President of Sales, Merchandising and Marketing. From 1970 to 1996, Mr. Hatch held various senior management positions at Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc. located in Phoenix, Arizona, which later merged with Smith’s Food and Drug.

~~(5)~~Edward ~~GCP~~C. isAgnew became a ~~Delaware~~director ~~limited~~in ~~partnership~~December ~~managed~~2002. byHe is ana ~~affiliate~~former ofretail ~~LGP,~~executive ~~which~~with isover an36 ~~affiliate~~years of ~~the~~retail ~~general~~experience. ~~partner~~Mr. Agnew ofheld ~~GCP.~~various ~~Each~~officer oflevel ~~Messrs.~~assignments ~~Sokoloff~~with Jewel Companies, ~~Nolan~~Inc., ~~Danhakl~~Buttrey Food and Drug, ~~Seiffer~~Inc., ~~Baumer~~ and ~~Halper~~American ~~either~~Stores/Albertsons, ~~directly~~Inc. ~~(whether~~Mr. Agnew ~~through~~began ~~ownership~~his ~~interest~~career in or1963 ~~position)~~with orJewel ~~through~~Food & ~~one~~Drug ofStores ~~more~~where ~~intermediaries,~~he ~~may~~served bein ~~deemed~~various tocapacities ~~control~~including ~~the~~General ~~affiliate~~Manager of ~~LGP~~its ~~and~~Midwest ~~such~~Division. ~~general~~In ~~partner~~1987, Mr. Agnew ~~The~~was ~~affiliate~~appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of ~~LGP~~Buttrey Food and ~~such~~Drug, ~~general~~Inc. ~~partner~~In 1990, ~~may~~Mr. Agnew besuccessfully ~~deemed~~led toa ~~control~~leveraged ~~the~~buyout ~~voting~~of Buttrey Food and ~~disposition~~Drug ofStore ~~the~~Company ~~shares~~and ofsuccessfully ~~Leslie’s~~completed ~~common~~an ~~stock~~initial ~~owned~~public byoffering ~~GCP.~~of ~~Accordingly,~~the ~~for~~Company ~~certain~~in ~~purposes,~~early ~~Messrs~~1993. ~~Sokoloff,~~In ~~Nolan~~1994, ~~Danhakl,~~Mr. Agnew ~~Seiffer,~~returned ~~Baumer~~to ~~and~~American ~~Halper~~Stores, ~~may~~Inc., bewhere ~~deemed~~he served toas bea ~~beneficial~~Senior ~~owners~~Vice ofPresident ~~the~~and ~~shares~~member of ~~Leslie~~the Company’s ~~common~~Executive ~~stock~~Committee ~~held~~until byhis ~~GCP~~retirement in 1999.

(6) Includes 352,500 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days and 250,000 shares of Leslie’s common stock.

(7) Includes 260,834 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days and 250,000 shares of Leslie’s common stock.

(8) All such shares are subject to options exercisable within 60 days.

John M. Baumer became a director of the Company in November 2001. He has been an executive officer and equity owner of LGP, the firm that manages Green Equity ~~Compensation~~Investors ~~Plan~~II, ~~Information~~L.P. (“GEI”), since 1999. Mr. Baumer had previously been a Vice President at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation (“DLJ”), and had been with DLJ since 1995. Prior to joining DLJ, Mr. Baumer was at Fidelity Investments and Arthur Andersen. Mr. Baumer is also a director of Intercontinental Art, Inc., VCA Antech, Inc., The Brickman Group, Ltd. and Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.

	Number of securities to beissued upon exercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exerciseprice of outstandingoptions, warrants andrights (b)		Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensation plans(excluding securitiesreflected in column (a) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders	1,628,760	$	2.42	3,001,738
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders	—		—	—

John G. Danhakl became a director of the Company in June 1997. He has been an executive officer and an equity owner of LGP, the firm that manages GEI, since 1995. Mr. Danhakl had previously been a Managing Director at DLJ and had been with DLJ since 1990. Prior to joining DLJ, Mr. Danhakl was a Vice President at Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated. Mr. Danhakl is also a director of Arden Group, Inc., Petco Animal Supplies, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Sagittarius Brands, The Tire Rack, Inc. and Horseshows In The Sun.

Michael J. Fourticq became a director of the Company in June 1997. He also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors from May 1988 until ~~ITEM~~January 132000. ~~CERTAIN~~Between ~~RELATIONSHIPS~~May ~~AND~~1988 ~~RELATED~~and ~~TRANSACTIONS~~August 1992, he served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. From 1995 to 2001, Mr. Fourticq had been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Brown Jordan International, a leading manufacturer of outdoor and casual furniture products. Since 1985 he has been the general partner of Hancock Park Associates, which is the general partner and affiliate of several investment partnerships. Mr. Fourticq is also on the board of directors of Gordon Biersch.

~~Management~~Rick ~~Agreement~~D. Carlson is Senior Vice President of Commercial, Service and Logistics of the Company. Mr. Carlson has over 18 years of retail experience and has been with the Company since February of 2000 when he joined the team as Vice President of Logistics. Most recently Mr. Carlson was the General Manager of the Alaska Division of Totem Ocean Trailer Express. From 1995 until 1999, he was the Director of Transportation and Freight Operations of Carr Gottstein Foods Co., Alaska’s largest food and drug retailer and wholesale provider. Prior to that time he held several management positions at Buttrey Food and Drug Co.

~~LGP,~~Brian ~~HPA~~P. ~~and Leslie’s~~Agnew ~~are~~became ~~parties~~Senior toVice aPresident, ~~Management~~Store ~~Agreement~~Operations ~~dated June 11~~on September 29, ~~1997~~2005. ~~The~~Brian ~~Management~~Agnew ~~Agreement~~is ~~provides~~a ~~that~~20 ~~Leslie’s~~year ~~will~~retail ~~pay~~veteran ~~LGP~~and anwas ~~annual~~previously ~~fee~~the ofregional ~~$244,800~~Vice ~~for~~President ~~ongoing~~of ~~management,~~Operations ~~consulting~~in ~~and~~the ~~financial~~Company’s ~~services.~~Southeast InRegion ~~addition,~~from ~~subject~~September ~~to certain~~2003 ~~approval~~through ~~requirements,~~October ~~the~~2005. ~~Management~~From ~~Agreement~~May ~~provides~~2003 ~~that~~through ~~either,~~September or2003 ~~both~~he held ~~LGP~~the ~~and~~position ~~HPA~~of ~~may~~District ~~provide~~Manager ~~financial~~with ~~advisory~~the orCompany. ~~investment~~Prior ~~banking~~to ~~services~~joining ~~for~~ Leslie’s, inBrian ~~connection~~Agnew ~~with~~held ~~major~~several ~~financial~~management ~~transactions,~~positions ~~and/or~~in ~~LGP~~the ~~and~~retail ~~HPA will~~grocery beindustry ~~paid~~with aJewel ~~reasonable~~Foods, ~~fee~~American ~~for~~Stores ~~such~~Company ~~services.~~and ~~The~~Albertson’s, ~~Management~~Inc. ~~Agreement~~Brian ~~terminates~~Agnew on is the ~~earlier~~son of ~~the~~Edward ~~tenth~~C. ~~anniversary~~Agnew, ofwho ~~its~~has ~~execution~~served oras ~~the~~a ~~date~~director ~~that LGP affiliates hold 25% or less~~ of the ~~shares~~Company ofsince ~~Leslie’s~~December ~~that they held on the date of the Management Agreement~~2002.

~~Stockholders~~Craig ~~Agreement~~A. Wright is Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer of the Company. Mr. Wright joined the Company in April of 2008 as Vice President Direct Marketing and assumed the role of SVP and CIO in March of 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wright was the Senior Vice President of National Sales and Logistics for Millard Refrigerated Services, one of the largest third-party providers of refrigerated warehouse and distribution in the United States. From 1981 to 1998, Mr. Wright held progressive management roles with Buttrey Food and Drug Co., including Vice President of Merchandising & Distribution.

~~Leslie’s,~~All executive ~~GEI,~~officers ~~the members~~ of the ~~HPA~~Company ~~Group, and the other holders of Leslie’s securities (including options)~~ are ~~parties~~chosen toby ~~a Stockholders Agreement (~~the ~~“Stockholders~~Board ~~Agreement”). The Stockholders Agreement provides the Company and certain Stockholders certain rights to repurchase a portion~~ of ~~the~~Directors ~~NQ Options, NQ Shares~~ and ~~the~~serve ~~Subscription~~at ~~Stock of certain other Stockholders upon their ceasing to provide services to~~ the ~~Company.~~Board’s ~~The~~discretion ~~Stockholders~~except ~~Agreement~~as ~~generally~~provided ~~restricts the transferability of securities of the Company (“Securities”) held by certain of the Stockholders and establishes a right of first refusal,~~ in the ~~event~~employment ~~certain~~agreements ~~Stockholders~~described ~~seek~~below tounder ~~transfer any of their Securities to a third party, in favor of some other Stockholders. In addition, GEI has certain~~ “~~drag-along”~~Executive ~~rights~~Compensation—Employment ~~and if GEI desires to sell any Securities, other Stockholders have certain “tag-along~~Agreements” ~~rights to participate in such sale~~. ~~The Stockholders Agreement also grants demand registration rights to~~ ~~certain Stockholders and piggyback registration rights for all Stockholders. In the Stockholders Agreement, Mr. Fourticq has certain rights to be elected as a director of the Company.~~

~~Stock~~No ~~Repurchase~~Audit ~~and~~Committee ~~Promissory Note Agreements~~

OnThe ~~March 23, 2001, the~~ Company ~~individually,~~does ~~and~~not ~~Lawrence~~have ~~Hayward,~~an ~~President~~audit ~~and CEO~~committee, ~~Donald~~nor ~~Anderson,~~is ~~Executive~~any ~~Vice President~~member ~~and~~of ~~CFO, and Green Equity Investors II, L.P., (~~the ~~“Purchasers”)~~Board ~~entered~~a ~~into two separate Stock Purchase Agreements, (the~~ “~~Agreements”)~~financial ~~with Brian P. McDermott, (“McDermott~~expert”) ~~the~~within ~~Company’s former President and CEO (~~the ~~“McDermott~~meaning ~~Transactions”).~~of ~~Pursuant to~~ the ~~Agreements,~~regulations ~~the Company repurchased 277,775 shares~~ of the ~~Company’s~~Securities ~~voting~~and ~~common~~Exchange ~~stock~~Commission. ~~held~~As bya ~~McDermott~~voluntary ~~for~~filer anwithout ~~aggregate~~a ~~purchase~~public ~~price~~market ~~of $499,995 and the Purchasers~~for ~~acquired~~our ~~the~~equity ~~remaining 554~~securities,~~985~~ ~~shares~~we ofare ~~the~~not ~~Company’s~~required ~~voting~~to ~~common~~have ~~stock held by McDermott for~~ an ~~aggregate~~audit ~~purchase~~committee ~~price~~or ofa ~~$998,973~~financial expert. ~~Also~~We ~~pursuant~~do tonot ~~the~~believe ~~Agreements,~~that ~~(i)~~we ~~McDermott’s~~could ~~existing~~recruit ~~options were cancelled and of no further effect; (ii) McDermott resigned from his position as~~ a ~~director~~financial onexpert ~~the~~without ~~Board~~unwarranted ofexpense ~~Directors of the Company;~~ and ~~(iii) the Consulting Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1999, between McDermott and the Company was terminated~~difficulty.

AsCode ~~part~~ of ~~the~~Ethics McDermott Transactions, the Company entered into separate loan agreements with each of Mr. Hayward and Mr. Anderson, pursuant to which the Company loaned $225,000 to each of Hayward and Anderson, respectively, thereby providing a portion of the funds required for each of Anderson and Hayward to purchase the shares of the Company’s common stock sold by McDermott. Each Loan, together with all accrued interest, will be due and payable to the Company in full, on the earlier of: 1) the date which is 7th anniversary of the Note and 2) the termination of Borrower’s employment with the Company for any reason, other than a termination by the Company without Just Cause, and is secured by a portion of the shares being purchased by each of Hayward and Anderson, pursuant to Pledge Agreements executed concurrently by each of Hayward and Anderson.

~~ITEM~~The ~~14.~~Company ~~PRINCIPAL~~has ~~ACCOUNTANT~~adopted ~~FEES~~a ~~AND~~Code ~~SERVICES~~of Ethics and a copy may be obtained, without charge, by written request to the Company Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Audit Fees (1)		$	193,000
Audit-Related Fees (2)			21,000

Section 16(a) is Not Applicable

~~(1)~~The ~~Includes~~Company ~~fees~~is ~~and~~a ~~expenses~~voluntary ~~related~~filer towithout ~~the~~a ~~fiscal~~public ~~year~~market ~~audit~~for ~~and~~its ~~interim~~equity ~~reviews~~securities. Consequently, ~~notwithstanding when~~ the ~~fees~~executive officers and ~~expenses~~directors ~~were~~are ~~billed~~not orrequired ~~when~~to ~~the~~comply ~~services~~with ~~rendered~~Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

(2) Includes fees and expenses for services rendered from October through September of the fiscal year, notwithstanding when the fees and expenses were billed.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION, DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Board of Directors of the Company does not maintain a compensation committee. Our Board of Directors reviews and approves our compensation practices for attracting, retaining and motivating our Named Executive Officers (or NEOs).

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis details the Company’s strategy and practices for compensating our NEOs, who in fiscal 2009 were:


Name		Title
Lawrence H. Hayward		Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Steven L. Ortega		Chief Financial Officer, EVP and Director
Michael L. Hatch		President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
Craig A. Wright		Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer
Rick D. Carlson		Senior Vice President, Commercial, Service and Logistics

Objectives of the Executive Compensation Program

Our compensation programs are designed to provide a competitive level of total compensation (base salary, variable pay, and benefits) to attract and retain talented executives and to motivate our Named Executive Officers to achieve the Company’s business objectives, as approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors uses published surveys to determine whether the compensation provided to NEOs and other executives is competitive. However, the Board does not benchmark against any specific companies. Total compensation is reviewed when the Board of Directors deems it necessary but such review does not typically occur on an annual basis.

Elements of Executive Compensation

The elements of the Company’s compensation are comprised of:

•

Base salary;

•

At risk variable bonuses tied to the Company’s performance;

•

Benefits and other perquisites; and

•

Severance and other post-termination payments as defined in certain of the NEOs’ employment agreements.

What the Compensation Element is Designed to Reward and How It Relates to the Objectives

Each pay element is designed to reward different results as shown below:


Compensation Element	Designed to Reward	Relationship to the Objectives
Base Salary	Experience, knowledge of the Company and industry, dedication to assigned job, and performance by the executive on behalf of the Company	Provides competitive pay to attract and retain talented NEOs

Bonus	Success in achieving the Company’s financial and operational goals	Motivate and reward executives to achieve the Company’s annual business objectives Provide competitive pay to attract and retain talented NEOs

Benefits and Other Perquisites	Initial and continued employment by the NEOs	Provide competitive compensation to attract and retain talented executives

Severance and Other Post-Termination Payments	Initial and continued employment by the executive	Provide competitive compensation to attract and retain talented executives

Base Salary

Base salary is paid for on-going employment throughout the year. It is intended to compensate the NEOs for their basic services performed for the Company thorough the year. In setting base salary, the Board of Directors considers each NEO’s experience, role and job responsibilities. The Board or Directors reviews base salary when it deems necessary and such review does not always occur on an annual basis.

Bonus

In the first quarter of each fiscal year, the Board of Directors meets to review the Company’s budget and targeted EBITDA goals for the fiscal year. At that meeting, the Board approves a threshold EBITDA target for the Company before bonuses will be paid to NEOs. If the EBITDA target is not achieved, bonuses will not be paid. Consequently, all bonuses are at risk.

In fiscal 2009, the Board of Directors set $101.5 million as the annual EBITDA threshold before bonuses would be paid. Bonuses for NEOs were subject to a cap of 150% of the target bonus and bonuses were targeted in the following amounts:


Name		Target Bonus
Lawrence H. Hayward		70% of base salary
Steven L. Ortega		60% of base salary
Michael L. Hatch		60% of base salary
Craig A. Wright		35% of base salary
Rick D. Carlson		35% of base salary

The Company exceeded the EBITDA threshold and, consequently, each of the NEOs received more than their target bonus, as set forth in detail in the Summary Compensation Table below.

Benefits and Other Perquisites

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) plan that is available for all eligible employees, including the NEOs. Participants may elect to defer up to 25% of their compensation as pre-tax contributions through regular payroll deductions, subject to the limitations set forth in the Internal Revenue Code. Participants who have attained age 50 before the end of the year are also eligible to make catch-up contributions. The Company currently provides a discretionary matching contribution to each eligible participant’s account, equal to 50% of an eligible employee’s elective contributions, up to 4% of their total compensation.

Welfare Benefits

The NEOs are eligible to participate in any medical, dental, life insurance, disability, 401k or stock option plan made generally available by the Company to executives.

Cash Allowance

Messrs. Hayward and Ortega’s employment agreements provide for the payment by the Company of an annual cash allowance for expenses, including those which may be considered partially or wholly personal in nature. The annual cash allowance is automatically increased annually by 5% from that paid in the prior year. In addition, Messrs. Hayward and Ortega are each entitled to a tax gross-up for any taxes related to his receipt of the cash allowance. In fiscal 2009, Mr. Hayward’s annual cash allowance was $60,775 and his gross-up amount was $34,268. In fiscal 2009, Mr. Ortega’s annual cash allowance was $18,191 and his gross-up amount was $11,396.

Personal Use of Corporate Aircraft

Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Hayward is permitted to use the corporate aircraft for personal use at the Company’s expense. Further, he is entitled to a gross-up for any tax liability incurred in connection with this benefit up to a maximum reimbursement of $100,000 per year, subject to an annual increase of 5% per year. Mr. Hayward is authorized to permit use of the corporate aircraft, at his discretion, for Messrs. Ortega and Hatch. Messrs. Ortega and Hatch are entitled to a gross-up for any tax liabilities incurred in connection with this benefit.

Separation Arrangements

As described in detail below, employment agreements for three of the NEOs specify certain severance benefits to be paid in the event of an involuntary termination of such executive’s employment. The Company provides such separation benefits in order to remain competitive in attracting and retaining executives.

Mr. Hayward’s employment agreement also provides for severance payment if he elects to terminate his employment following a change in control of the Company, as the Board of Directors believes that it is critical to maintain management’s business focus in the event of a potential transaction.

For further details, please refer to the section “Severance, Termination and Change in Control Payments” below.

Stock Option Awards

During fiscal 2009, the Board of Directors of Holdings approved grants of time-based options to a number of employees of the Company, including the NEO’s as follows:


Name		Number of Options Granted for Fiscal 2009
Lawrence H. Hayward		60,000
Steven L. Ortega		30,000
Michael L. Hatch		30,000
Craig A. Wright		22,500
Rick D. Carlson		10,000

The options vest over a five year period at a rate of 20% annually on each anniversary of the date of grant and have an exercise price of $2.90 per share. The fair value of the options granted was determined to be $2.90 based on management’s estimate of an enterprise value of Holdings at the time of grant. These option grants are included in the compensation tables below.

Additionally, in fiscal 2010, the Board of Directors of Holdings approved grants of time based options to a number of employees of the Company, including the NEOs as follows:


Name		Number of Options Granted for Fiscal 2010
Lawrence H. Hayward		80,000
Steven L. Ortega		30,000
Michael L. Hatch		100,000
Craig A. Wright		17,500
Rick D. Carlson		10,000

The Board of Directors determined to issue options to purchase shares of Holdings’ common stock in order to provide an incentive to the NEOs to remain in the employ of the Company and to align the NEOs interests with the shareholders of Holdings in order to maximize long-term value.

Compensation of the Named Executive Officers

The following tables show, for fiscal year 2009, compensation awarded or paid to, or earned by, our CEO, CFO, and three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO. We refer to these executives collectively herein as the Named Executive Officers or NEOs.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Grants ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)(1)	(g)(2)	(h)	(i)		(j)
Lawrence H. Hayward	2009	517,000	—	—	74,910	363,710	—	122,452	(3)	1,078,072
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board	2008 2007	517,000 517,000	— —	— —	42,034 —	373,480 496,521	— —	106,993 94,558		1,039,507 1,108,079

Steven L. Ortega	2009	330,750	—	—	37,455	199,442	—	52,631	(4)	620,278
Chief Financial Officer, EVP and Director	2008 2007	330,750 330,750	— —	— —	21,017 —	204,800 272,270	— —	33,405 31,754		589,972 634,774

Michael L. Hatch	2009	320,000	—	—	37,455	192,960	—	5,116	(5)	555,532
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director	2008 2007	320,000 320,000	— —	— —	21,017 —	198,144 263,421	— —	4,955 4,400		544,116 587,821

Craig A. Wright	2009	166,693	—	—	27,937	58,760	—	80,580	(5)	333,678
SVP, Chief Information Officer	2008	70,769	—	—	52,659	23,521	—	28		146,977

Rick D. Carlson	2009	170,000	—	—	12,485	61,092	—	4,182	(5)	237,857
SVP, Commercial, Service and Logistics	2008 2007	170,000 170,000	— —	— —	10,509 —	61,406 81,273	— —	4,620 4,400		246,535 255,673

(1)

The amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial reporting purposes for the respective period of awards issued pursuant to the 2005 Stock Option Plan and includes amounts from awards granted in fiscal 2009 and in prior years. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts for the fiscal years ended October 3, 2009 are included in footnote 15 to our consolidated financial statements.

(2)

Bonuses are attributed to the year earned and are paid out after the conclusion of the fiscal year. For fiscal 2008, certain of the NEOs received their bonuses in November 2008 and others received their bonuses in January 2008. For Fiscal 2009, all of the NEOs received their bonuses in December 2009.

(3)

Represents (i) a cash allowance of $60,775 for 2009 for all expenses, including those that may be personal in nature, (ii) a gross up payment of $34,268 for 2009 related to the cash allowance, (iii) the Company’s matching contributions to Mr. Hayward’s 401(k) account, and (iv) the incremental cost of the Company’s aircraft used for non-business flights, which was valued for Mr. Hayward at $22,348. The incremental cost of the Company’s aircraft used for a non-business flight is calculated by multiplying the aircraft’s hourly variable operating cost by a trip’s flight time. The aircraft’s variable operating costs include: (1) Aircraft fuel and oil; (2) maintenance, parts and external labor; (3) landing, parking, passenger ground transportation, crew travel and flight planning expenses; and (4) supplies and catering expenses. Fixed costs that do not vary based upon usage are not included in the calculation of variable operating cost. On certain occasions, an NEO’s spouse, family member or guest may accompany the NEO on a flight. There are normally no incremental costs associated with such situations; however if there were incremental costs such costs would be reflected in the table above.

(4)

Represents (i) a cash allowance of $18,191 for 2009 for all expenses, including those that may be personal in nature, (ii) a gross up payment of $11,396 for 2009 related to the cash allowance, (iii) the Company’s matching contributions to Mr. Ortega’s 401(k) account, and (iv) the incremental cost of the Company’s aircraft used for non-business flights, which was valued for Mr. Ortega at $18,264. The incremental cost of the Company’s aircraft used for a non-business flight is calculated by multiplying the aircraft’s hourly variable operating cost by a trip’s flight time. The aircraft’s variable operating costs include: (1) Aircraft fuel and oil; (2) maintenance, parts and external labor; (3) landing, parking, passenger ground transportation, crew travel and flight planning expenses; and (4) supplies and catering expenses. Fixed costs that do not vary based upon usage are not included in the calculation of variable operating cost. On certain occasions, an NEO’s spouse, family member or guest may accompany the NEO on a flight. There are normally no incremental costs associated with such situations; however if there were incremental costs such costs would be reflected in the table above.

(5)	Represents the Company’s matching contributions to each NEO’s 401(k) account.

GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

Name

Grant Date

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

All Other Option
Awards: Number

of Securities
Underlying

Options

($)

Exercise or Base

Price of Option
Awards

($)

Grant Date Fair
Value of Option
Awards

($)

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)(1)

(h)

Lawrence H. Hayward

N/A

180,950

361,900

542,850

N/A

11/17/2008

N/A

60,000

2.90

74,910

Steven L. Ortega

N/A

99,225

198,450

297,675

N/A

11/17/2008

N/A

30,000

2.90

37,455

Michael L. Hatch

N/A

96,000

192,000

288,000

N/A

11/17/2008

N/A

30,000

2.90

37,455

Craig A. Wright

N/A

29,171

58,342

87,514

N/A

11/17/2008

N/A

7,500

2.90

9,364

3/2/2009

N/A

15,000

2.90

18,573

Rick D. Carlson

N/A

29,750

59,500

89,250

N/A

11/17/2008

N/A

10,000

2.90

12,485

(1)	In fiscal year 2009, the fair value of the common stock underlying the 2005 Incentive Stock Option Plan options granted was determined to be $2.90 based on management’s estimate of an enterprise value of the Company at the time of grant.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements

Lawrence H. Hayward

The Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Lawrence Hayward on June 15, 2007, for his employment as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company. On February 8, 2008, the Company restated and supplemented the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Mr. Hayward. Certain modifications were made to the agreement, including changes related to compensation in the event of termination of employment. Mr. Hayward’s Amended and Restated Agreement was amended on January 28, 2009 to provide for use of the corporate aircraft. The employment agreement expires on February 7, 2013 but shall automatically extend for successive one-year periods unless notice is provided in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement.

Under the employment agreement, the Company shall pay Mr. Hayward a salary at an annual rate of $517,000. Mr. Hayward shall also be eligible to participate in the Company’s bonus plan, with a target bonus for each year of not less than 70% of his base salary in effect at the end of such year. Under the employment agreement, the Company shall pay Mr. Hayward an annual cash allowance for expenses, which was $60,775 for 2009 (increased annually by 5%), that relates to his employment which might be considered partially or wholly personal in nature, and he is entitled to a tax gross-up for any taxes related to his receipt of the cash allowance. Mr. Hayward is permitted to use the corporate aircraft for personal use at the Company’s expense. Further, he is entitled to a gross-up for any tax liability incurred in connection with this benefit up to a maximum reimbursement of $100,000 per year, subject to an annual increase of 5% per year. Mr. Hayward is entitled to receive other benefits such as four (4) weeks of vacation each year, personal and sick leave, insurance and other benefits consistent with the then-current policies of the Company and equal to those benefits extended to the most senior executives of the Company. Mr. Hayward’s employment agreement also contains non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants and provides that Mr. Hayward serves as a Director at the will of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Steven L. Ortega

The Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Steven Ortega on June 15, 2007, for his employment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of no less than $330,750 annually. Mr. Ortega is also eligible to participate in the Company’s bonus plan with a target bonus of at least 60% of his base salary in effect for the fiscal year. The bonus plan shall provide for a minimum bonus of 50% of target upon achievement of threshold performance. Mr. Ortega is also entitled to receive prompt reimbursement for all expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred by him in performing his duties. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Ortega is paid an annual cash allowance for expenses, which was $18,191 for 2009 (increased annually by 5%), that relates to his employment which might be considered partially or wholly personal in nature, and he is entitled to a tax gross-up for any taxes related to his receipt of the cash allowance. Mr. Ortega is eligible to participate in any medical, dental, life insurance, disability, retirement, profit-sharing, savings, stock option plan or stock-based compensation plan made generally available by the Company to executives. Additionally, he is eligible to receive vacation (not less than 4 weeks paid vacation per year) and sick leave. The employment agreement contains non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants and provides that Mr. Ortega will serve as a Director at the will of the Company’s Board of Directors. The employment agreement expires on April 22, 2010 but shall automatically extend for successive one-year periods unless notice is given in accordance with the employment agreement.

Michael L. Hatch

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Michael L. Hatch on June 15, 2007, for his employment as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The employment agreement provides for an annual minimum base salary of $320,000, and provides that Mr. Hatch is eligible during each fiscal year for an annual bonus of 60% of his annual base salary. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Hatch is eligible to participate in the Company’s benefit plans consistent with the benefits generally available to executives. Such benefits include four (4) weeks of vacation each year, personal and sick leave, disability, and medical and life insurance. Under the employment agreement Mr. Hatch is also subject to non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants, and he serves at the will of the Company’s Board of Directors.

2005 Stock Option Plan

As of the 2007 Reorganization, all contractual rights and obligations relating to the Company’s 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and related agreements were assumed by Holdings. During the second quarter of 2007 and pursuant to the 2005 Plan, Holdings’ board of directors approved the acceleration of the vesting of all outstanding stock options to purchase shares of common stock of Holdings. The fair value of the awards immediately before the modification of the vesting was the same value as the fair value after the modification took effect. All of the outstanding options were exercised in February of 2007 after the 2007 Reorganization and all exercises by the NEOs are reflected in the table below. During fiscal 2008, our Named Executive Officers did not receive any grants of stock options or other stock awards. In November 2008, the Board of Directors of Holdings approved grants of time based options to a number of employees of the Company, including the NEOs. The options vest over a five year period at a rate of 20% annually on each anniversary of the date of grant.

Option Holdings

The following table includes certain information with respect to all options previously awarded to the executive officers named above that were outstanding as of October 3, 2009.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT OCTOBER 3, 2009


	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)(1)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Name	Exercisable	Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Lawrence H. Hayward	8,000	32,000	$	2.30	11/7/17
	—	60,000	$	2.90	11/17/18
Steven L. Ortega	4,000	16,000	$	2.30	11/7/17
	—	30,000	$	2.90	11/17/18
Michael L. Hatch	4,000	16,000	$	2.30	11/7/17
	4,000	30,000	$	2.90	11/17/18
Craig A. Wright	10,000	40,000	$	2.30	05/20/18
	—	7,500	$	2.90	11/17/18
	—	15,000	$	2.90	3/2/19
Rick D. Carlson	2,000	8,000	$	2.30	11/7/17
	—	10,000	$	2.90	11/17/18

(1)	All of the options in the table were granted ten years prior to the expiration date and vest over a five year period at a rate of 20% annually on each anniversary of the date of grant.

Severance, Termination and Change in Control Payments

Lawrence H. Hayward

Pursuant to Mr. Hayward’s employment agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Hayward’s employment for any reason other than his death, disability, Just Cause, or pursuant to the Company’s retirement policy or if Mr. Hayward terminates his employment for Good Reason, the Company shall pay him a lump sum cash amount equal to 200% of the sum of (i) his base salary in effect at the time of the termination, and (ii) the greater of his target bonus for such year and the average of his bonuses for the prior two years. Also, the Company shall continue to provide, and pay the corporate and individual premiums for, health and medical-care insurance coverage of Mr. Hayward and his spouse for the remainder of their respective lives and for Mr. Hayward’s dependents until they each reach the age of 21 years old. In addition, Mr. Hayward is entitled to a tax gross-up if excise taxes are imposed as a result of any payments made under the agreement. The amount of the gross-up will be sufficient to cover all such taxes, interests and penalties.

If Mr. Hayward’s employment is terminated by the Company or himself as a result of Mr. Hayward’s disability or in the case of his death, LPM shall pay Mr. Hayward or his estate a lump-sum cash amount equal to 200% of the sum of: (i) his base salary in effect at the time of termination plus (ii) the greater of (x) his target bonus for such year or (y) the average of his bonuses paid with respect to the prior five years. Additionally, upon such termination for disability, the Company shall continue to provide, and pay the corporate and individual premiums for, health and medical-care insurance coverage of Mr. Hayward and his spouse for the remainder of their respective lives and for Mr. Hayward’s dependents until they each reach the age of 21 years old. In addition, Mr. Hayward or his estate shall be entitled to (a) a pro rata portion of his cash allowance for the year in which his employment terminated, (b) any outstanding reimbursements to which he is entitled; (c) compensation for unused vacation and (d) any other amounts or benefits due after the termination of employment under the terms of any other applicable agreements, awards, plans, policies or programs of the Company.

In addition to the foregoing, in the event Mr. Hayward holds any options to purchase Holdings securities at time of termination of his employment for death or disability, such options shall accelerate and become fully vested. Moreover, the Companies and the Green Parties (as defined in the employment agreement) agree not to

exercise the Call Option (as defined in the employment agreement), to the extent such option is exercisable at the time of termination of Mr. Hayward’s employment for death or disability within the meaning of the Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated as of February 20, 2007 among the Company, Holdings and certain stockholders of Holdings. The Company and Holdings further agree that in such event, at any time between the fourth and fifth anniversary of the date of such termination of employment, Mr. Hayward or his estate shall be entitled to notify the Company to repurchase, for cash, within 60 days of receipt of such notice, all of his shares of Holdings stock then held (whether by Mr. Hayward or any Individual Related Party, within the meaning of the Stockholders Agreement) at the Fair Market Value thereof (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement), provided that such repurchase, (i) would not result in a violation of any material agreement to which the Company is then party, (ii) complies with the applicable provisions of state law and (iii) would not result in a violation of the fiduciary duties of the Boards of Directors of the Company and Holdings.

“Just Cause” is defined in the employment agreement as termination of employment for any of the following reasons: (i) Mr. Hayward’s conviction of a felony, without the right of further appeal, which has an adverse impact on the Company or which involves the material misappropriation of the Company’s assets, (ii) an intentional or grossly negligent violation by Mr. Hayward of any reasonable policy of the Board of Directors of the Company that results in material damage to the Company and which, if such violation is curable, after notice to do so, Mr. Hayward fails to correct within a reasonable time, or (iii) the performance of services by Mr. Hayward for any other company, entity, or person which directly competes with the Company during the time Mr. Hayward is employed by the Company, without the written approval of the Company’s Board of Directors.

“Good Reason” is described in the employment agreement as (i) relocation of Mr. Hayward’s home due to the relocation of the corporate office beyond a 25-mile radius of the current office located in Phoenix, Arizona, or (ii) the consummation of a Change in Control.

“Change in Control” is defined as any of the following: (i) GCP California Fund, L.P. and its affiliates cease to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, a majority of the voting securities of the Company, (ii) a merger or consolidation of Holdings or the Company, or (iii) the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company, in each case in a transaction or series of transactions as a result of which a majority of the voting securities of the Company cease to be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by GCP California Fund, L.P. or any of its affiliates.

Steven L. Ortega

Pursuant to Mr. Ortega’s employment agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Ortega’s employment for any reason other than Cause or Mr. Ortega terminates his employment for Good Reason, Mr. Ortega will receive the following: (i) any unpaid base salary that has been earned at the time of such termination, (ii) a pro-rata portion of the cash allowance of the year less any amount previously disbursed in that year, (iii) any reimbursements to which he was entitled, (iv) compensation for accrued but unused vacation, (v) any other amounts or benefits due after the termination of employment under the terms of other agreements, (vi) 200% percent of (A) his base salary in effect at the time of the termination, plus (B) his target bonus for the year of termination to be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll procedures, (vii) reimbursement for the premium payable by Mr. Ortega for health and medical-care insurance coverage under COBRA for a period of 18 months after termination, and (viii) independent, offsite, executive career transition and outplacement services. If Mr. Ortega’s employment is terminated due to death, his estate will receive an amount equal to his target bonus for the fiscal year.

“Cause” is defined in the employment agreement as any of the following: (i) Mr. Ortega’s breach of the employment agreement or a material Company policy, (ii) the engaging by Mr. Ortega in willful, reckless or grossly negligent misconduct, or (iii) Mr. Ortega failing or refusing to perform any material obligation or to carry out the reasonable directives of his supervisor consistent with his duties, and Mr. Ortega fails to cure the same within a period of 10 days after written notice of such failure is provided to him by the Company.

“Good Reason” is deemed to exists if (i) there is a material diminution in the title and/or duties, responsibilities or authority of Mr. Ortega, (ii) the Company requires Mr. Ortega to move to another location of the Company or any affiliate and the distance between the new job site is at least 50 miles away from metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, (iii) there is a willful failure or refusal by the Company to perform any material obligation under the employment agreement, or (iv) there is a reduction in Mr. Ortega’s base salary or annual bonus target amount.

Michael L. Hatch

Pursuant to Mr. Hatch’s employment agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Hatch’s employment for any reason other than under its retirement policy, upon Mr. Hatch’s death or disability, or for Just Cause, then the Company shall pay him a lump sum amount equal to his current annual salary and target bonus, less normal withholdings and will reimburse Mr. Hatch for a period of twelve (12) months after termination for his health and medical-care insurance coverage.

“Just Cause” is defined in the employment agreement as termination of employment for any of the following reasons: (i) Mr. Hatch’s breach of the employment agreement or of a material policy of the Board of Directors of the Company, (ii) the engaging by Mr. Hatch in willful, reckless or grossly negligent misconduct, (iii) Mr. Hatch’s indictment, charge, conviction or guilty pleas (or plea of nolo contendere) with respect of an offense involving moral turpitude or a felony, (iv) Mr. Hatch’s failing or refusing to perform any material obligation or to carry out the reasonable directives of Mr. Hatch’s supervisor consistent with his duties, and Mr. Hatch fails to cure the same within a period of 10 days after written notice of such failure is provided to Mr. Hatch, or (v) the performance of services by Mr. Hatch for any other company, entity, or person which directly competes with the Company during the time Mr. Hatch is employed by the Company, without the written approval of the Board of the Company.

We did not execute employment agreements with any other Named Executive Officers.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table sets forth potential payments for each Named Executive Officer in the event of various termination circumstances. This presentation assumes termination has occurred on the last business day of fiscal 2009. Due to uncertainties inherent in this estimation process, it is possible actual payments may vary from these estimates.


Name	Termination by the Company other than for Death, Disability or Cause			Resignation by the NEO for Good Reason			Voluntary Resignation by the NEO	Retirement	Death			Disability			Termination by NEO after a Change in Control
Lawrence H. Hayward	$	2,218,000	(1)	$	2,218,000	(1)	—	—	$	2,293,000	(2)	$	2,516,000	(2)	$	2,218,000	(3)
Steven L. Ortega	$	1,093,900	(4)	$	1,093,900	(4)	—	—		198,450	(5)		—			—
Michael L. Hatch	$	524,000	(6)		—		—	—		—			—			—
Craig A. Wright		—			—		—	—		—			—			—
Rick D. Carlson		—			—		—	—		—			—			—

(1)

Comprised of (i) 200% of (x) Mr. Hayward’s base salary in effect at the time of termination and (y) the greater of his target bonus for such year and the average of his bonuses for the prior five years, (ii) an amount equal to the corporate and individual premiums for, health and medical-care insurance coverage of Mr. Hayward and his spouse for the remainder of their respective lives and for Mr. Hayward’s dependents until they each reach the age of 21 years old.

(2)

Comprised of (i) 200% of the sum of: (x) Mr. Hayward’s base salary in effect at the time of termination plus (y) the greater of his target bonus for such year or the average of his bonuses paid with respect to the prior five years and (ii) the aggregate value (based upon the spread) of Mr. Hayward’s outstanding options that would vest as a result of his termination. In the case of disability, this amount also includes the corporate and individual premiums for, health and

medical-care insurance coverage of Mr. Hayward and his spouse for the remainder of their respective lives and for Mr. Hayward’s dependents until they each reach the age of 21 years old.

(3)

Comprised of all amounts set forth in footnote (1) above. In addition, Mr. Hayward is entitled to a tax gross-up if excise taxes are imposed as a result of any payment made under the agreement. If Mr. Hayward had been terminated following a Change in Control on the last day of fiscal year 2009, there would have been no gross-up payments.

(4)

Comprised of (i) 200% of Mr. Ortega’s base salary in effect at the time of termination, (ii) 200% of his target bonus for such year, (iii) an amount equal to the monthly premium payable by Mr. Ortega for health and medical insurance coverage for him and his dependents for eighteen months, and (iv) an estimate of the costs of providing Mr. Ortega with the career transition and outplacement services set forth in his employment agreement.

(5)	If Mr. Ortega’s employment terminates on account of death, he will receive his target bonus for the fiscal year in which he died.

(6)	Comprised of (i) Mr. Hatch’s annual salary at the time of termination, (ii) his target bonus for such year, and (iii) an amount equal to the monthly premium payable by Mr. Hatch for health and medical insurance coverage for him and his dependents for twelve months.

Directors’ Compensation

The following table lists each of our directors, who is not also an NEO. Generally, Directors do not receive any compensation for their service on the Company’s Board of Directors other than reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings. However, during fiscal 2009, Mr. Edward Agnew received $4,000 for each quarterly meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Non-employee directors also are eligible to receive grants of stock options pursuant to the discretion of the Board of Directors. During 2009, Mr. Edward Agnew was granted an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Leslie’s Holding’s Inc. common stock at a price equal to the fair market value at the time of the award of $2.90 per share. This option award vests 20% each year over a period of five years.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

For Fiscal Year Ended 2009


Name (a)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (b)	Stock Awards ($) (c)	Option Awards ($) (d)(1)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (e)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (f)	All Other Compensation ($) (g)	Total ($) (h)
Edward C. Agnew	16,000	—	18,283	—	—	—	34,283
John M. Baumer	—	—	—	—	—	—	0
John G. Danhakl	—	—	—	—	—	—	0
Michael J. Fourticq	—	—	—	—	—	—	0

(1)

On May 2, 2009, Mr. Agnew was granted an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Leslie’s Holding’s Inc. common stock. All 15,000 shares were outstanding and no shares were exercisable as of October 3, 2009. The amount reflects the dollar amount recognized for financial reporting purposes for the respective period pursuant to the 2005 Stock Option Plan and includes amounts from awards granted in fiscal 2009. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts for the fiscal years ended October 3, 2009 are included in footnote 15 to our consolidated financial statements. At the end of the 2009 fiscal year, Mr. Agnew had 30,000 shares of option awards outstanding.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Board of Directors of the Company does not have a compensation committee. The independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors sets compensation in executive session. None of our Named Executive Officers participated in discussions of the Board of Directors related to executive compensation in fiscal 2009.

Compensation Committee Report

The Company’s Board of Directors does not have a compensation committee. The Board of Directors of the Company reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above for the 2009 fiscal year. As a result of this review and discussion, the Board of Directors approved the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in this annual report.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS:		Lawrence H. Hayward (Chairman)
		Steven L. Ortega
		Michael L. Hatch
		Edward C. Agnew
		John M. Baumer
		John G. Danhakl
		Michael J. Fourticq

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Holdings beneficially owned 100% of the Company’s common stock as of October 3, 2009. Accordingly, Holdings owned 100% of the economic and voting power in the Company. The following table sets forth information as of October 3, 2009 with respect to (i) all persons known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of Holdings’ common stock; (ii) all executive officers; (iii) all directors; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock	Percentage of Shares Outstanding
Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC(2)	9,152,403	21.0
John M. Baumer(2)(3)	33,867,730	77.6
John G. Danhakl(2)(3)	33,867,730	77.6
GCP California Fund, L.P.(3)	24,715,327	56.6
Michael J. Fourticq	732,270	1.7
Edward C. Agnew	—	—
Lawrence H. Hayward	3,050,000	7.0
Steven L. Ortega	920,000	2.1
Michael L. Hatch	420,000	1.0
Craig A. Wright	—	—
Rick D. Carlson	270,000	0.6
All executive officers and directors as a group (9 persons)	39,260,000	90.4

(1)

The address of Messrs. Fourticq, Hayward, Ortega, Hatch, Wright and Carlson is 3925 E. Broadway Road, Suite 100, Phoenix, Arizona 85040. The address of Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC, GCP and Messrs. Baumer and Danhakl is 11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 90025. The address of Mr. Agnew is 22294 N. 79th Place Scottsdale, AZ 85255.

(2)

Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company managed by LGP. Each of Messrs. Jonathan D. Sokoloff, Peter J. Nolan, John D. Danhakl, Jonathan A. Seiffer, John M. Baumer and Timothy J. Flynn, either directly (whether through ownership interest or position) or through one or more intermediaries, may be deemed to control LGP. Accordingly, for certain purposes, Messrs. Sokoloff, Nolan, Danhakl, Seiffer, Baumer and Flynn may be deemed to be beneficial owners of the shares of the Company’s common stock held or controlled by LGP. However, such individuals disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities held by LGP, except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein.

(3)

GCP is a Delaware limited partnership managed by an affiliate of LGP, which is an affiliate of the general partner of GCP. Each of Messrs. Sokoloff, Nolan, Danhakl, Seiffer, Baumer and Flynn either directly (whether through ownership interest or position) or through one or more intermediaries, may be deemed to control the affiliate of LGP and such general partner. The affiliate of LGP and such general partner may be deemed to control the voting and disposition of the shares of the Company’s common stock owned by GCP. Accordingly, for certain purposes, Messrs. Sokoloff, Nolan, Danhakl, Seiffer, Baumer and Flynn may be deemed to be beneficial owners of the shares of the Company’s common stock held by GCP. However, such individuals disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities held by GCP, except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Management Services Agreement

We entered into a Management Services Agreement with LGP concurrent with the consummation of the 2005 Recapitalization. The Management Services Agreement provides that we will pay LGP an annual fee of $1.0 million for ongoing management, consulting and financial services. In addition, the Management Services

Agreement provides that LGP may provide us with financial advisory or investment banking services in connection with major financial transactions, and LGP will be paid a customary fee for such services. The Management Services Agreement will terminate on the earlier of (a) the tenth anniversary of its execution dated January 25, 2005; provided that the agreement will automatically extend for one year periods thereafter unless either we or LGP gives the other three months prior notice of termination, (b) the consummation of a change of control, including the date that LGP affiliates hold 40% or less of the Company’s shares and (c) the consummation of a public offering of the Company’s common stock in an aggregate offering amount of at least $50 million or as a result of which at least 15% of the Company’s shares of common stock is publicly traded. In the event of the Company’s bankruptcy, liquidation, insolvency or winding-up, the payment of all accrued and unpaid fees pursuant to the Management Services Agreement is subordinated to the prior payment in full of all amounts due and owing under the indenture governing the notes.

Stockholders Agreement

We entered into a Stockholders Agreement with GCP and each of the Company’s other stockholders concurrent with the consummation of the 2005 Recapitalization. The Stockholders Agreement generally restricts the transferability of the Company’s stock and gives GCP and its affiliates a right of first refusal in the event any other stockholder seeks to transfer any of the Company’s stock to a third party. In addition, GCP and its affiliates have certain “drag-along” rights and if GCP and its affiliates desire to sell any of the Company’s stock, other stockholders will have certain “tag-along” rights to participate in such sale. We and certain of the non-management stockholders have certain rights to repurchase a portion of the stock held by management upon their ceasing to provide services to us. The Stockholders Agreement also grants demand registration rights to the non-management stockholders and piggyback registration rights for all stockholders. Finally, Mr. Fourticq has certain rights to be elected as a director of Leslie’s.

On October 25, 2005, certain provisions of the Stockholders Agreement were amended dealing with termination of employment and in February 2007, the Stockholders Agreement was amended further reflecting the certain modifications related to the 2007 Reorganization.

Indemnification

We have agreed that we will indemnify all of the Company’s current and former directors and officers after the consummation of the 2005 Recapitalization for all costs and expenses incurred in proceedings arising out of or pertaining to the 2005 Recapitalization.

Director Independence

We are a corporation with public debt (not listed on any exchange) whose equity is privately held by Holdings, a private holding company. Although our Board has not made a formal determination on the matter, under current New York Stock Exchange listing standards (which we are not currently subject to) and taking into account any applicable committee standards, we believe that Messrs. Hayward, Ortega and Hatch would not be considered independent under any general listing standards or those applicable to any particular committee due to their employment relationship with the Company, Mr. Edward Agnew would not be considered independent under any general listing standards or those applicable to any particular committee due to his son’s employment with the Company as Senior Vice President of Operations, and Messrs. Danhakl and Baumer may not be considered independent under any general listing standards or those applicable to any particular committee, due to their direct relationship with LGP and GCP, our largest shareholders.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The firm of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the financial statements of our company for the fiscal years 2008 and 2009. The Board of Directors of the Company approve all engagements and fees prior to any services being rendered by our principle accountants.

Aggregate fees billed to our company for the fiscal years ended October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008 by Ernst & Young LLP, are as follows:


	Fiscal 2009		Fiscal 2008
Audit Fees(1)	$	397,145	$	398,300
Audit-Related Fees(2)		23,000		37,200
Tax Fees(2)		64,750		—

Total	$	484,895	$	435,500

(1)	Includes fees and expenses related to the fiscal year audit and interim reviews, notwithstanding when the fees and expenses were billed or when the services were rendered.

(2)	Includes fees and expenses for various services rendered from October through September of the fiscal year, notwithstanding when the fees and expenses were billed.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES ~~AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K~~

(a)(1), (2) The following financial statements and financial statement schedules are included herewith and are filed as part of this annual report.

Consolidated Balance Sheets—October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		24

Consolidated Balance Sheets—October 3, 2009 and September 27, 2008		25

Consolidated Statements of Operations—Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007		26

Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit)—Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007		27

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 2009, September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007		28

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		29

Consolidated Statements of Income—Years Ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)—Years Ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows— Years Ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003, and September 28, 2002

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(a)(3) The following exhibits set forth below are filed as part of this annual report or are incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit Number		Description
ExhibitNumber		Description
3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 6, 1997*
2.1*		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 7, 2005 between the Company and LPM Acquisition LLC (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2005)
3.2		Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Exchangeable Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series A filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 11, 1997*
2.2*		Agreement and Plan of Merger to Form Holding Company (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 9, 2007)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 16, 1998*
3.1*		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on January 25, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
3.4		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 26, 2000*
3.2*		Bylaws of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 27, 1997)
3.5		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on February 22, 2001*
3.3*		Form of Certificate of Incorporation of Surviving Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 9, 2007)
3.6		Bylaws of the Company*
4.1*		Indenture dated as of May 21, 2003 between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on July 18, 2003)
4.1		Indenture dated as of June 11, 1997 between the Company and U.S. Trust Company of California, N.A.*
4.2*		Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 11, 2005 between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2005)
4.2		Indenture dated as of May 21, 2003 between the Company and the Bank of New York.*
4.3*		Indenture dated as of January 25, 2005 between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2005)
10.1		Stockholders Agreement and Subscription Agreement dated as of June 11, 1997 among the Company and Green Equity Investors II, LP, Richard H. Hillman, Michael J. Fourticq, Greg Fourticq, Brian P. McDermott, the Trustees of the McDermott Family Trust, Occidental Petroleum Corporation and the Stockholders identified on the signature pages thereto*
10.1*		Stockholders Agreement dated as of January 25, 2005 among the Company, GCP California Fund, L.P., Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC and the stockholders identified on the signature pages thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.2		NQ Option Plan and form of Agreement*
10.3		ISO Option Plan and form of Agreements*
10.4		Lease for Dallas Distribution Center*
10.5		Lease for Ontario Distribution Center*
10.6		Lease for Bridgeport Distribution Center*
10.7		Form of Director’s and Officer’s Indemnification Agreement dated as of June 11, 1997 between the Company and certain members of management*
10.8		Management Agreement dated as of June 11, 1997 between the Company and Leonard Green & Partners, LP*
10.9		1998 Nonvoting Stock Option Plan*
10.10		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 21, 2003 between the Company and Lawrence H. Hayward*
10.11		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 21, 2003 between the Company and Donald J. Anderson*
10.12		Loan and Security Agreement June 22, 2000 among the Company and Foothill Capital Corporation*

4863

Exhibit Number		Description
ExhibitNumber		Description
10.13		Amendment Number One to Loan and Security Agreement*
10.2*		Amendment dated as of October 25, 2005 to the Stockholders Agreement dated as of January 25, 2005 among the Company, GCP California Fund, L.P., Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC and the stockholders identified on the signature pages thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 20, 2005)
10.14		Secured, Non-recourse Promissory Note and Pledge Agreement - Lawrence H. Hayward*
10.3*		Management Services Agreement dated as of January 25, 2005 between the Company and Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.15		Secured, Non-recourse Promissory Note and Pledge Agreement - Donald J. Anderson*
10.4*		Lease Agreement dated as of August 30, 1990 by and between Adams Property Associates and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on July 21, 1997)
21.1		Subsidiaries*
10.5*		First Amendment dated as of June 21, 1996 to the Lease Agreement dated August 30, 1990 by and between Adams Property Associates and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
24.1		Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
10.6*		Second Amendment dated as of September 30, 1999 to the Lease Agreement dated August 30, 1990 by and between Adams Property Associates and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
31.1		Certification of Lawrence H. Hayward
10.7*		Third Amendment dated as of April 14, 2000 to the Lease Agreement dated August 30, 1990 by and between Adams Property Associates and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
31.2		Certification of Donald J. Anderson
10.8*		Fourth Amendment dated as of November 1, 2004 to the Lease Agreement dated August 30, 1990 by and between Adams Property Associates and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 20, 2005)
32.1		Certification of Lawrence H. Hayward and Donald J. Anderson
10.9*		Lease dated as of November 26, 1996 by and between Bedford Property Investors, Inc. and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on July 21, 1997)
10.10*		Addendum dated as of November 1996 to the Lease dated November 26, 1996 by and between Bedford Property Investors, Inc. and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.11*		Lease Agreement dated as of December 30, 1997 by and between Liberty Property Limited Partnership and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on July 21, 1997)
10.12*		First Amendment dated as of June 3, 1999 to the Lease Agreement dated December 30, 1997 by and between Liberty Property Limited Partnership and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.13*		Lease dated as of April 30, 1998 by and between Paul Hemmer Development Co., III and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.14*		First Addendum dated as of July 21, 1999 to the Lease dated April 30, 1998 by and between Paul Hemmer Development Co., III and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.15*		Lease Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004 between ProLogis and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)
10.16*		Lease dated as of October 31, 2000 between Broadway Business Center LLC and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)


Exhibit Number		Description
10.17*		First Amendment dated as of November 30, 2000 to the Lease dated as of October 31, 2000 between Broadway Business Center LLC and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)

10.18*		Second Amendment dated as of June 26, 2001 to the Lease dated as of October 31, 2000 between Broadway Business Center LLC and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)

10.19*		Third Amendment dated as of May 31, 2002 to the Lease dated as of October 31, 2000 between Broadway Business Center LLC and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)

10.20*		Fourth Amendment dated as of April 9, 2004 to the Lease dated as of October 31, 2000 between Broadway Business Center LLC and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)

10.21*		Form of Director’s and Officer’s Indemnification Agreement dated as of January 1, 2000 between the Company and certain members of management (previously filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on April 22, 2005)

10.22*		2005 Stock Option Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 20, 2005)

10.23*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 8, 2008 between the Company and Lawrence H. Hayward (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 12, 2008)

10.24*		Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of June 15, 2007 between the Company and Steven L. Ortega (previously filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 17, 2007)

10.25*		Employment Agreement dated as of June 15, 2007 between the Company and Michael L. Hatch (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 19, 2007)

10.26*		Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of January 25, 2005 between the Company, LPM Manufacturing, Inc., Wells Fargo Retail Finance LLC and the other lenders parties thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2005)

10.27*		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2005, between the Company and certain holders of the Company’s 7.75% Senior Notes due 2013 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2005)

10.28*		First Amendment dated as of July 26, 2007 to the Lease dated November 26, 2006 by and between Bedford Property Investors, Inc. and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 17, 2007)

10.29*		Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 15, 2006 to the Stockholders Agreement dated as of January 25, 2005 among the Company, GCP California Fund, L.P., Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC and the stockholders identified on the signature pages thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 9, 2007)

10.30*		Amendment No. 3 dated as of February 7, 2007 to the Stockholders Agreement dated as of January 25, 2005 among the Company, GCP California Fund, L.P., Leslie’s Coinvestment, LLC and the stockholders identified on the signature pages thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 9, 2007)


Exhibit Number		Description
10.31*		Third Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to the Lease Agreement dated December 30, 1997 by and between Liberty Property Limited Partnership and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 22, 2008)

10.32		Lease Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009 by and between EastGroup Properties, LP and the Company.

10.33		Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 30, 2009 between the Company, LPM Manufacturing, Inc., Wells Fargo Retail Finance LLC and the other lenders parties thereto.

21.1*		Subsidiaries (previously filed as Exhibit 21.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K405 filed on December 22, 1999)

24.1		Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

31.1		Certification of Lawrence H. Hayward

31.2		Certification of Steven L. Ortega

32.1		Certification of Lawrence H. Hayward and Steven L. Ortega

*	Previously filed

~~(b)~~† ~~Reports~~Management oncontract ~~Form~~or ~~8-K~~compensatory plan

~~None.~~66

COPIES OF THIS FORM 10-K MAY BE OBTAINED WITHOUT CHARGE UPON WRITTEN

REQUEST TO THE COMPANY AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:

LESLIE’S POOLMART, INC.

3925 E. BROADWAY RD., SUITE #100

PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85040

ATTN: CORPORATE SECRETARY

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Phoenix, State of Arizona, on December 13 23, ~~2004~~2009.

LESLIE’S POOLMART, INC. (Registrant) By: /s/ ~~DONALD~~STEVEN JL. ~~ANDERSON~~ORTEGA ~~Donald~~Steven JL. ~~Anderson~~Ortega Chief Financial Officer

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Lawrence H. Hayward, ~~Donald~~Steven JL. ~~Anderson~~Ortega, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney- or attorneys-in-fact and agent or agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including pre-or post-effective amendments) to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agent, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature	Capacity	Date
/s/ LAWRENCE H. HAYWARD	Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President	December 15, 2004
/S/ LAWRENCE H. HAYWARD Lawrence H. Hayward	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer	December 23, 2009
Lawrence H. Hayward
/S/ EDWARD C. AGNEW Edward C. Agnew	Director	December 23, 2009
/s/ EDWARD C. AGNEW	Director	December 15, 2004
/S/ JOHN M. BAUMER John M. Baumer	Director	December 23, 2009
Edward C. Agnew
/S/ JOHN G. DANHAKL John G. Danhakl	Director	December 23, 2009
/s/ JOHN M. BAUMER	Director	December 15, 2004
John M. Baumer
/s/ JOHN G. DANHAKL	Director	December 15, 2004
John G. Danhakl
/s/ MICHAEL J. FOURTICQ	Director	December 15, 2004
Michael J. Fourticq
/s/ DONALD J. ANDERSON	Chief Financial Officer, Director and Principal Accounting Officer	December 15, 2004
Donald J. Anderson

5067


Signature	Capacity	Date

/S/ MICHAEL J. FOURTICQ Michael J. Fourticq	Director	December 23, 2009

/S/ MICHAEL L. HATCH Michael L. Hatch	President, Chief Operating Officer and Director	December 23, 2009

/S/ STEVEN L. ORTEGA Steven L. Ortega	Chief Financial Officer, Director and Principal Accounting Officer	December 23, 2009

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · LESLIES POOLMART INC