OurTable effective tax rate was 33.9% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to effective tax rate benefit of 38.9% in the same period one year ago. The change in our effective tax rate is attributable to a sales tax credit and a hiring credit under the Enterprise Zone (“EZ”) designation. We became eligible for the EZ credits effective October 2006. Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 333-79587

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		33-0051150
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
14000 San Bernardino Avenue Fontana, California		92335
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

14000 San Bernardino Avenue Fontana, California		92335
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(909) 350-6300

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). ¨ Yes x No

As of ~~April~~July 23, 2010, 4,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value, were outstanding.

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		1
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009		1
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009		1
Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		2
Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		2
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		3
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)		3
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)		4
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		67
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		1112
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		1113
PART II OTHER INFORMATION		1314
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS		1314
SIGNATURE		1415
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		1516
EXHIBITS

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Balance Sheets

($ in thousands except share and per share amounts)

	March 31,2010		December 31,2009
	June 30,2010		December 31,2009
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5517,~~155~~778	$	61,671
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $950 and $700 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		79,889		24,108
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $900 and $700 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		88,649		24,108
Inventories		~~136~~270,~~937~~814		185,068
Prepaid income taxes		11,~~704~~721		16,160
Other receivables and prepaid expenses		13,~~773~~889		2,201
Total current assets		~~285~~392,~~458~~851		289,208
Other assets		19,~~571~~455		19,646
Property, plant and equipment, net		~~277~~278,~~624~~257		276,593
Total assets	$	~~582~~690,~~653~~563	$	585,447
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	27118,~~124~~475	$	39,793
Accrued interest expense		~~667~~2,971		3,010
Accrued utilities		32,~~324~~824		1,433
Deferred income taxes		6,682		6,682
Other accrued expenses		87,~~713~~522		6,290
Current portion of long-term debt		10,000		10,000
Total current liabilities		56148,~~510~~474		67,208
Other liabilities		2,~~488~~470		2,506
Long-term debt		~~172~~170,~~500~~000		175,000
Deferred income taxes		40,062		40,062
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity
Class A preferred stock, $10,000 par value per share. Authorized 1,000 shares; none issued		—		—
Class B preferred stock, $10,000 par value per share. Authorized 2,000 shares; none issued		—		—
Class C preferred stock, $10,000 par value per share. Authorized 3,000 shares; none issued		—		—
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 5,000 shares; 4,000 shares issued and outstanding		40,000		40,000
Retained earnings		~~271~~289,~~093~~557		260,671
Total stockholders’ equity		~~311~~329,~~093~~557		300,671
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~582~~690,~~653~~563	$	585,447

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Statements of Operations

($In in thousands)

	Three months endedMarch 31,
	Three months endedJune 30,						Six months endedJune 30,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net sales	$	~~232~~301,~~744~~665		$	~~147~~104,~~067~~195		$	534,409		$	251,262
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales, excluding lower of cost or market adjustment		~~211~~266,~~532~~197			~~133~~101,~~320~~867			477,729			235,187
Lower of cost or market adjustment		—800			354,~~000~~800			800			39,800
Gross profit (loss)		2134,~~212~~668			(212,~~253~~472	)		55,880			(23,725	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4,~~748~~918			4,~~406~~128			9,666			8,534
Loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment		~~240~~96			—			336			—
Income (loss) from operations		1629,~~224~~654			(256,~~659~~600	)		45,878			(32,259	)
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense, net		(1,~~858~~799	)		(21,~~321~~920	)		(3,657	)		(4,241	)
Other, net		1,392			2,872
Other income, net		142			2,113			1,534			4,985
Income (loss) before income tax expense		15,758			(25,108	)
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		27,997			(6,407	)		43,755			(31,515	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		59,~~336~~533			(93,~~775~~580	)		14,869			(13,355	)
Net income (loss)	$	1018,~~422~~464		$	(152,~~333~~827	)		28,886			(18,160	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

	Three months endedMarch 31,
	Six months endedJune 30,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	1028,~~422~~886		$	(1518,~~333~~160	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		714,~~300~~929			816,~~308~~565
Loss (gain) on disposition of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets		240			(438	)
Loss (gain) on disposition of property, plant and equipment and equipment and intangible assets		336			(438	)
Inventory write-down		—800			3539,~~000~~800
Change in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net		(5564,~~781~~541	)		38,~~780~~353
Inventories		48(86,~~131~~546	)		5062,~~147~~231
Other receivables and prepaid expenses		~~428~~(1,688	)		~~969~~1,344
Accounts payable		~~(12~~78,~~669~~682	)		(5143,703	)
Prepaid income taxes		4,~~456~~439			4138,~~652~~175
Accrued interest expense		(~~2,343~~39	)		(~~2,345~~43	)
Other accrued expenses and liabilities		42,~~296~~587			2(1,~~511~~070	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,480			72,548
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(22,155	)		103,054
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(816,~~422~~695	)		(1123,~~836~~634	)
(Removal cost) proceeds for the disposal and sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets		(74	)		1,519
(Removal cost) proceeds for the disposal and sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, net		(43	)		1,519
Net cash used in investing activities		(816,~~496~~738	)		(1022,~~317~~115	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of long-term debt		(25,~~500~~000	)		—
Net cash used in financing activities		(25,~~500~~000	)		—
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(643,~~516~~893	)		6280,~~231~~939
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		61,671			10,880
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5517,~~155~~778		$	7391,~~111~~819
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)	$	43,~~171~~631		$	4,~~617~~323
Income taxes (net of amount refunded)	$	~~879~~10,420		$	(51,427	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Notes To Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms “California Steel,” “we,” “us,” and “our” in these Notes to the Financial Statements refers to California Steel Industries, Inc.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation as prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. All adjustments were comprised of normal recurring adjustments, except as noted in these Notes to Financial Statements. Our interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year. The interim financial statements and the related notes in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2009. Results of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-6”). This update amended guidance and issued a clarification with regard to disclosure requirements about fair market value measurement. A reporting entity is required to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, for measurements utilizing significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. We adopted ASU 2010-6 on January 1, 2010. There was no impact upon adoption of ASU 2010-6 to our financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-9, “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2010-9”). This amendment removed the requirement for a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. This amendment is effective upon issuance date of February 24, 2010. There was no impact upon adoption of ASU 2010-9 to our financial position or results of operations.

23. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined under the first-in, first-out method of accounting) or market value and consist of the following ($ in thousands):

	March 31,2010		December 31,2009
	June 30,2010		December 31,2009
	(Unaudited)
Finished goods	$	2325,~~001~~390	$	11,294
Work in process		3245,~~822~~874		17,164
Raw materials		62181,~~925~~188		137,234
Supplies		18,~~189~~363		19,376
	$	~~136~~270,~~937~~815	$	185,068

34. Credit Facility

In September 2005, we entered into a five year $110.0 million credit facility with a bank group led by Mizuho Corporate Bank, as administrative agent and a lender, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., Citibank (West), FSB and Wells Fargo Bank. Subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions and a borrowing base, advances under this facility may be made at any time prior to the credit facility termination date. There were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The credit facility is collateralized by accounts receivable and inventory. Advances under this facility may be used for letters of credit, working capital, capital expenditures, payment of dividends and other lawful corporate purposes, including the refinancing of existing debt. The facility requires us to maintain certain financial ratios and other financial covenants. We were in compliance with all the covenants at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Notes To Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

45. Commitments and Contingencies

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we are committed in the form of open purchase orders, to purchase approximately $~~322~~161.42 million in steel slabs, of which $5222.31 million are from a related party, ~~and~~ material commitments for capital expenditures of $914.21 million and other assorted contractual commitments of $3.7 million.

When market conditions warrant, we enter into contracts to purchase certain commodities used in the manufacturing of our products, such as electricity and natural gas. Some of these forward contracts do not require derivative accounting as we take possession of the commodities in the normal course of business whereas other forward contracts are accounted for as derivatives in accordance with the accounting literature related to derivatives and hedges by us.

We have been contacted by various governmental agencies regarding specified environmental matters at our operating facility in Fontana, California. During September 1990, we reached preliminary agreement with the California Regional Department of Health Services, which allows us to draft our own remediation agreement and move forward with our own plan of action at our operating facility. In November 1992, we entered into a Voluntary and Enforceable Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC”) which sets forth certain terms and conditions related to the remediation of hazardous substances at our operating facility. The Agreement also preserves our right as to future assignment and apportionment of costs to other parties.

We are addressing environmental concerns caused by the former occupant at our Fontana site. We have engaged an environmental consultant to conduct a remedial investigation and develop a remediation plan and remediation cost projections based upon the plan. Utilizing the remediation plan developed by the environmental consultant, we developed an estimate of future costs of the remediation plan. The total aggregate cost of remediation is estimated to be approximately $1.8 million, which is included in other liabilities at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The DTSC has not yet completed its review and approval of our remediation plan; however, preliminary discussions between the DTSC and us have not indicated the need for any significant changes to the remediation plan or our estimate of related costs. The estimate of costs could change as a result of changes to the remediation plan required by the DTSC or unforeseen circumstances, including without limitations, unknown site conditions, changes to applicable regulations or increased enforcement requirements by the regulators existing at the site.

We are involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. It is in our opinion, based on advice of legal counsel, that this litigation will be resolved without material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

We are self-insured for workers’ compensation. The accrued liability associated with these programs is based on our estimate of the ultimate costs to settle known claims as well as claims incurred but not yet reported (IBNR claims) as of the balance sheet date. The estimated liability is not discounted and is based on information provided by our insurance brokers and insurers, combined with our judgments regarding a number of assumptions and factors, including the frequency and severity of claims, our claims development history, case jurisdiction, related legislation, and our claim settlement practice. Significant judgment is required to estimate IBNR claims as parties have yet to assert such claims. If actual trends, including the severity or frequency of claims, differ from our estimates, our financial results could be impacted.

56. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prescribed by the accounting literature contains three levels as follows:

• Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible as of the measurement date.


• Level 1 –		Inputs to the valuation based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible as of the measurement date.

• Level 2 –		Inputs to the valuation include quoted prices in either markets that are not active, or in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3 –		Inputs to the valuation that are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

• Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation include quoted prices in either markets that are not active, or in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation that are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.

Notes To Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Our ~~financial~~senior ~~assets~~notes ~~and~~are ~~liabilities~~reported ~~measured~~at carrying value. The fair value of our senior notes is the asking price of our senior notes at the end of the fiscal quarter. The carrying value and fair value onof aour ~~recurring~~senior ~~basis~~notes are $150.0 million and $141.0 million at ~~March~~ June 3130, 2010, ~~were~~and as$150.0 ~~follows~~million ~~(dollars~~and in$144.0 ~~thousands):~~million at December 31, 2009, respectively.

	Fair Value Measurement Using
Description	Quoted Prices inActive Marketsfor IdenticalAssets(Level 1)		SignificantOtherObservableInputs(Level 2)		SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	55,155	$	—	$	—	$	55,155

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our ~~senior~~financial ~~notes~~instruments are ~~reported~~ atprimarily ~~carrying~~comprised ~~value.~~of ~~The~~cash ~~fair~~and ~~value~~cash ofequivalents, ~~our~~receivables, ~~senior~~accounts ~~notes~~payable, isaccrued ~~the~~liabilities ~~asking~~and long-term ~~price~~debt. ofFor ~~our~~cash ~~senior~~and ~~notes~~cash atequivalents, ~~the~~receivables, ~~end~~accounts ofpayable ~~the~~and ~~fiscal~~accrued ~~quarter.~~liabilities, ~~The~~the carrying ~~value~~amount ~~and~~approximates fair value because of ~~our~~the ~~senior~~short ~~notes~~maturity ~~are~~of ~~$150~~these instruments.0 ~~million~~The ~~and~~estimated ~~$142.7~~fair ~~million~~value of the senior notes due 2014 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, ~~and~~based ~~$150.0~~on ~~million~~quoted ~~and~~market prices, was $~~144~~141.0 million. Management estimates that the carrying values of our other financial instruments approximate their value since their realization or satisfaction is expected to occur in the short term or have been renegotiated at ~~December 31,~~a ~~2009,~~date ~~respectively~~close to quarter end.

68. ~~Fair~~Income ~~Value~~Taxes ~~of Financial Instruments~~

Our ~~financial~~effective ~~instruments~~tax ~~are~~rate ~~primarily~~was ~~comprised~~34.1% offor ~~cash~~the ~~and~~second ~~cash~~quarter ~~equivalents,~~and ~~receivables,~~an ~~accounts~~effective ~~payable,~~tax ~~accrued~~rate ~~liabilities~~of ~~and long-term debt~~34.0% ~~For~~for ~~cash~~the ~~and~~six ~~cash~~months ~~equivalents,~~ended ~~receivables~~June 30, ~~accounts~~2010 compared ~~payable~~to ~~and~~effective ~~accrued~~tax ~~liabilities,~~rate ~~the~~benefit ~~carrying~~of ~~amount~~55.9% ~~approximates~~and ~~fair~~42.4% ~~value~~in ~~because of~~ the ~~short~~same ~~maturity~~periods ofone ~~these~~year ~~instruments~~ago. The ~~estimated~~change ~~fair~~in ~~value~~our ofeffective ~~the~~tax ~~senior~~rate ~~notes~~is ~~due 2014~~attributable atto ~~March 31,~~tax ~~2010,~~benefits ~~based~~related onto ~~quoted~~California ~~market~~sales ~~prices,~~tax ~~was~~and ~~$142.7~~hiring ~~million.~~credits ~~Management~~under ~~estimates that~~ the ~~carrying~~Enterprise ~~values~~Zone (“EZ”) ofdesignation ~~our~~and ~~other~~an ~~financial~~overall ~~instruments~~reduction ~~approximate~~to ~~their~~our ~~value~~state ~~since~~tax ~~their~~liability ~~realization~~due ~~or satisfaction is expected~~ to ~~occur~~filing in ~~the~~ ~~short~~lower ~~term~~tax orrate ~~have been renegotiated at a date close to quarter end~~jurisdictions.

7.6 ~~Income Taxes~~

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A is presented in six sections:

•

Overview

•

Results of Operations

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources

•

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

•

Critical Accounting Policies

•

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Overview

California Steel is the leading producer of flat rolled steel in the western United States based on tonnage billed. We produce the widest range of flat rolled steel products in the region, including hot rolled, cold rolled and galvanized coil and sheet. We also produce electric resistance welded (referred to herein as ERW) pipe. Unlike integrated steel mills and mini-mills, we do not manufacture steel. Rather, we process steel slab manufactured by third parties. Our principal market consists of the 11 states located west of the Rocky Mountains. We have two main competitors located in the western United States. Steel products are also supplied to the western United States via imports from foreign companies and from domestic suppliers located outside the western United States. We believe our slab-based business model, breadth of products, non-union work environment, southern California location and long-standing customer relationships provide us with significant advantages over our competition.

Results of Operations

Financial Results

The following table represents unaudited selected financial data (amounts in thousands, excepted for billed tons):

	Three months endedMarch 31,
	Three months endedJune 30,						Six months endedJune 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Billed tons		~~326~~363,~~880~~127			~~156~~176,~~884~~832			690,007			333,717
Net sales	$	~~232~~301,~~744~~665		$	~~147~~104,~~067~~195		$	534,409		$	251,262
Net sales gain (loss) %		58190	%		-6076	%		113	%		-69	%
Gross profit (loss) as % of net sales		911.15	%		-142.54	%		10.5	%		-9.4	%
SG&A	$	4,~~748~~918		$	4,~~406~~128		$	9,666		$	8,534
SG&A as % of net sales		21.06	%		34.0	%		1.8	%		3.4	%
Operating income (loss)	$	1629,~~224~~654		$	(256,~~659~~600	)	$	45,878		$	(32,259	)
Operating income (loss) as % of net sales		79.08	%		-176.43	%		8.6	%		-12.8	%
Net income (loss)	$	1018,~~422~~464		$	(152,~~333~~827	)	$	28,886		$	(18,160	)

Net sales. Net sales in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased 58190% to $~~232~~301.7 million, compared with $~~147~~104.12 million in the same period one year ago. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in sales volume ofand ~~108~~a higher average selling price. Sales volume increased 105% and the average selling price increased 39% compared to the same period one year ago. The higher sales volume increased net sales approximately $~~154~~108.70 million. ~~This~~and ~~increase was partially offset by a decrease in~~ the higher average selling price increased ~~of 25% compared to the same period one year ago which decreased~~ net sales approximately $3056.85 million. The remaining ~~offsetting~~increase ~~decrease~~ in net sales was primarily from ~~lower~~higher value product mix ~~during~~and ~~the~~higher ~~first~~freight revenue in second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period one year ago.

~~Gross~~Net ~~profit~~sales ~~(loss).~~for ~~Our gross profit rate in~~ the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2010 increased 113% to 9$534.1%4 ~~of net sales~~million, compared with ~~a gross loss of 14~~$251.5%3 ofmillion ~~net sales~~ in the same period one year ago. The increase ~~was~~resulted ~~due~~primarily tofrom ~~higher~~an ~~sale~~increase in sales volume ~~which~~and ~~was~~a ~~partially~~slighter ~~offset~~higher byaverage ~~the~~selling ~~increase~~price. inSales ~~raw~~volume ~~material~~increased ~~consumption~~107% ~~costs.~~and ~~The~~the ~~write-down~~average ofselling ~~inventory~~price increased 1% compared to the ~~lower~~same ofperiod one year ago. The higher sales ~~cost~~volume orincreased ~~market~~net ofsales approximately $35261.08 million ~~reduced~~and ~~gross~~the ~~profit~~higher byaverage ~~23.8%~~selling ~~during~~price ~~the~~increased ~~first~~net ~~quarter~~sales ofapproximately ~~fiscal~~$16.7 ~~2009~~million. ~~There~~The remaining increase in net sales was noprimarily ~~such~~from ~~adjustment~~higher freight revenue during the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period one year ago.

~~Selling,~~Gross ~~general and administrative~~ (~~SG&A~~loss) ~~expenses~~profit. Our ~~SG&A~~gross ~~expense~~profit rate in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2010 ~~decreased~~increased ~~by 1.0%~~ to 211.05% of net sales, compared with 3a gross loss of 2.04% of net sales in the same period one year ago. ~~The~~Our ~~decrease~~gross inprofit ~~our~~rate ~~SG&A~~for ~~expense~~the ~~rate~~first issix ~~largely~~months ~~attributable~~of tofiscal an2010 ~~increase~~increased ofto ~~our~~10.5% of net sales, compared with a gross loss of 589.4% ~~since~~of net sales in the ~~majority~~same ofperiod ~~our~~one ~~SG&A expenses~~year ~~are~~ago. ~~fixed~~The increase was due to higher sales volume and average selling price and a lower inventory write-down which was partially offset by the increase in raw material consumption costs. ~~Our~~The ~~SG&A~~write-down ~~expenses~~of ~~consist~~inventory ~~primarily~~to the lower of ~~labor~~cost or market of $800 thousand for the three and ~~various~~six ~~administrative~~months ~~expenses.~~ended ~~Labor~~June 30, ~~costs~~2010 ~~comprised~~reduced ofgross ~~approximately~~profit 57by 0.3% and 580.1%, ofrespectively. ~~our~~The ~~SG&A~~write-down ~~expenses~~of ~~for~~inventory to the ~~first~~lower ~~quarter~~of cost or market of ~~fiscal~~$4.8 ~~2010~~million and $39.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, reduced gross profit by 4. 6% and 15.8%.

~~Net~~Selling, ~~interest~~general ~~expense~~and administrative (SG&A) expenses. ~~Net~~Our ~~interest~~SG&A expense rate in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased ~~$463,000,~~by ~~or 19~~2.94%, to $1.96% ~~million~~of net sales, compared with $24.0% of net sales in the same period one year ago. Our SG&A expense rate for the first six months of fiscal 2010 decreased by 1.6% to 1.8% of net sales, compared with 3.4% ~~million~~of net sales in the same period one year ago. The decrease in ~~net~~our ~~interest~~SG&A expense ~~was~~rate for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2010 is largely attributable to aan ~~decrease~~increase inof our net sales since the ~~average~~majority ~~outstanding~~of ~~debt~~our SG&A expenses are fixed costs. Our SG&A expenses consist primarily of labor and anvarious ~~increase~~administrative inexpenses. ~~capitalized~~Labor ~~interest~~costs comprised of ~~$359~~approximately 62% and 60% of our SG&A expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009,~~000~~ ~~when~~respectively, ~~compared~~and approximately to60% and 59% of our SG&A expenses for the ~~same~~first ~~period~~six ~~one~~months ~~year~~of ~~ago~~fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.

~~Other~~Net ~~income~~interest expense. ~~Other~~Net ~~income~~interest ~~was~~expense ~~$1.4~~in ~~million for~~ the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased $121,000, or 6.3%, to $1.8 million compared with $21.9 million in the same period one year ago. ~~Other~~Net ~~income~~interest isexpense ~~comprised~~for ofthe ~~miscellaneous~~first ~~income~~six ~~items~~months ~~such~~of asfiscal ~~rental~~2010 decreased ~~income~~$584,000, ~~proceeds~~or ~~from~~13.8%, ~~legal~~to ~~settlements,~~$3.7 ~~refund~~million ~~from~~compared ~~anti~~with ~~dumping~~$4.2 ~~subsidy,~~million ~~refund~~in ofthe ~~property~~same ~~taxes,~~period ~~etc~~one year ago. As ~~many~~The ofdecrease ~~these~~in ~~items~~net ~~occur~~interest ~~infrequently~~expense orwas ~~result~~attributable into a ~~one-time~~decrease ~~recognition~~in ofthe ~~income~~average outstanding debt and an increase in capitalized interest of $204,000 ~~this~~and ~~category~~$564,000 iswhen ~~subject~~compared to ~~significant~~the ~~fluctuation~~three ~~from~~and ~~period~~six tomonths ~~period~~ended June 30, 2009.

~~Income tax expense (benefit). Our income tax expense was $5.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with an income tax benefit of $9.~~8 million in the same period one year ago. Our effective income tax rate was 33.9% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with an effective income tax rate benefit of 38.9% in the same period one year ago.

Net income (loss). Our net income was $10.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with net loss of $15.3 million in the same period one year ago.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We ended the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 with $55.2 million of cash and cash equivalents compared with $61.7 million at the end of fiscal 2009. Working capital, the excess of current assets over current liabilities, was $228.9 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2010, up from $222.0 million at the end of fiscal 2009. We ended the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the end of fiscal 2009 with over $108.8 million in financing available under our revolving credit facility.

Other income, net. Other income, net was $142 thousand for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, compared with $2.1 million in the same period one year ago. Other income, net for the first six months of fiscal 2010 was $1.5 million compared to $5.0 million in the same period one year ago. Other income is comprised of miscellaneous income items such as rental income, proceeds from legal settlements, gain on sale of environmental credits, refund from anti dumping subsidy, refund of prior periods property taxes, etc. As many of these items occur infrequently or result in a one-time recognition of income, this category is subject to significant fluctuation from period to period.

Income tax expense (benefit). Our income tax expense was $9.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with an income tax benefit of $3.6 million in the same period one year ago. Income tax expense was $14.9 million for the first six months of fiscal 2010 compared with an income tax benefit of $13.4 million in the same period one year ago. Our effective income tax rate was 34.1% and 34.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to an income tax rate benefit of 55.9% and 42.4% in the same period one year ago. The change in our effective tax rate is attributable to tax benefits related to California sales tax and hiring credits under the Enterprise Zone (“EZ”) designation and an overall reduction to our state tax liability due to filing in lower tax rate jurisdictions.

Net (loss) income. Our net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $18.5 million and $28.9 million, respectively, compared to net loss of $2.8 million and $18.2 million in the same period one year ago.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We ended the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 with $17.8 million of cash and cash equivalents compared with $61.7 million at the end of fiscal 2009. Working capital, the excess of current assets over current liabilities, was $244.4 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2010, up from $222.0 million at the end of fiscal 2009. We ended the second quarter of fiscal 2010 with over $108.8 million in financing available under our revolving credit facility.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows in the first ~~three~~six months of the current and prior fiscal years ($ in thousands):

	Three months endedMarch 31,
	Six months endedJune 30,
	2010			2009
Total cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	4(22,~~480~~155	)	$	72103,~~548~~054
Investing activities		(816,~~496~~738	)		(1022,~~317~~115	)
Financing activities		(25,~~500~~000	)		—
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(643,~~516~~893	)	$	6280,~~231~~939

Operating Activities

Cash ~~provided~~used byin operating activities was $422.52 million for the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2010 compared with cash provided by operating activities of $72103.51 million in first ~~quarter~~ six months of fiscal 2009. The changes were due primarily to a change in net income, operating assets and liabilities and the inventory write-down. The changes in operating assets and liabilities were due primarily to changes in trade accounts receivable, inventories, accounts payable and prepaid income taxes. The decrease in cash provided for prepaid income taxes resulted mainly from an income tax refund that was received induring the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2009 which was partially offset by estimated tax payments due to higher estimated taxable income during the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2010. The decrease in cash ~~used~~provided for trade accounts receivable was primarily due to an ~~increased~~increase ~~sales~~in demand ~~volume~~for our products compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009. The increase in cash ~~used~~provided for accounts payable was due primarily to an increase in raw material purchases at a higher average slab price to keep up with the increased demand and the timing of vendor payments compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash ~~provided~~used ~~for~~in inventories was due to higher inventory levels maintained due to increased sales, increase in the average cost and the write-down of inventory to the lower or cost or market ~~during the first quarter of fiscal 2009~~.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was $816.57 million for the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2010 compared with $1022.31 million in the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2009. The decrease in cash used by investing activities was primarily due to the reduction in capital expenditures, specifically the construction of the second reheat furnace. The primary purposes of our capital expenditures were to ~~support~~ support our expansion plans and improve our operational efficiency.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities was $2.5.0 million for the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2010 compared to no financing activities ~~for~~during the ~~first~~ ~~quarter~~first six months of fiscal 2009. The changes in financing activities were due to repayments onof our term loan.

Sources of Liquidity

Our most significant sources of liquidity continue to be funds generated by operating activities and cash and cash equivalents. We believe funds generated from the expected results of operations and available cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to finance anticipated ~~capital~~expansion ~~expenditure~~ plans for fiscal ~~year~~ 2010. In addition, our revolving credit facility is available for additional working capital needs. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility.

On March 28, 2008, we entered into a Term Loan Agreement with The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. for a $40.0 million unsecured five-year term loan maturing April 2013 to finance construction of our second reheat furnace and other working capital needs. The Term Loan Agreement provided for a single loan disbursement of the entire principal amount on April 1, 2008. Interest on the principal balance of the loan shall accrue at a rate of 3.38% for the first two years of the loan and a rate of 3.58% for the remaining three years of the loan and is payable quarterly commencing July 2008. Quarterly principal payments commenced in July 2009.

In September 2005, we entered into a five year $110.0 million credit facility with a bank group led by Mizuho Corporate Bank, as administrative agent and a lender, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., Citibank (West), FSB and Wells Fargo Bank. Subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions and a borrowing base, advances under this credit facility may be made at any time prior to the credit facility termination date. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility. The credit facility is collateralized by accounts receivable and inventory. Advances under this facility may be used for letters of credit, working capital, capital expenditures, payment of dividends and other lawful corporate purposes, including the refinancing of existing debt.

On March 22, 2004, we issued an aggregate of $150.0 million of ten-year, 6.125% senior unsecured notes due in March 2014. With the proceeds of this issuance and cash on hand, we retired our 8.50% senior notes due in 2009. Interest on our 6.125% senior notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The notes are senior in right of payment to all of our subordinated indebtedness and equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future indebtedness that is not by its terms subordinated to the notes. We may redeem the notes in whole or in part at any time after March 15, 2009. The redemption price is based on a percentage premium in excess of the face value of the notes which decreases over time. We periodically evaluate the cost of alternative forms of financing in the market versus the cost of redeeming and retiring the notes. Depending on the current market value of the notes, we further periodically evaluate whether to acquire notes in the market as a means to lower our financing costs. The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock and make investments, create liens, sell assets, sell capital stock of certain subsidiaries, engage in transactions with affiliates and consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets and the assets of certain subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions at June 30, 2010.

8We currently have $14.1 million in material commitments for capital expenditures expected to be completed during fiscal 2010. These represent signed purchase orders for various production facility upgrades including the construction of our second reheat furnace. Our total budget for capital improvements in 2010 is $36.7 million of which $6.7 million relates to the second reheat furnace project. We are committed, in the form of open purchase orders, to purchase $161.2 million in steel slabs, of which $22.1 million is from a related party.

6.125% senior notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year. The notes are senior in right of payment to all of our subordinated indebtedness and equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future indebtedness that is not by its terms subordinated to the notes. We may redeem the notes in whole or in part at any time after March 15, 2009. The redemption price is based on a percentage premium in excess of the face value of the notes which decreases over time. We periodically evaluate the cost of alternative forms of financing in the market versus the cost of redeeming and retiring the notes. Depending on the current market value of the notes, we further periodically evaluate whether to acquire notes in the market as a means to lower our financing costs. The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock and make investments, create liens, sell assets, sell capital stock of certain subsidiaries, engage in transactions with affiliates and consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of our assets and the assets of certain subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions at March 31, 2010.

We currently have $9.2 million in material commitments for capital expenditures expected to be completed during fiscal 2010. These represent signed purchase orders for various production facility upgrades including the construction of our second reheat furnace. Our total budget for capital improvements in 2010 is $36.7 million of which $6.7 million relates to the second reheat furnace project. We are committed, in the form of open purchase orders, to purchase $322.4 million in steel slabs, of which $52.3 million are from a related party.

We anticipate that our primary liquidity requirements will be for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and the payment of dividends. We believe that cash generated from operations and available borrowings under our bank facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements for fiscal 2010.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table represents a comprehensive list of our contractual obligations and commitments as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 ($ in thousands):

	Total		LessThan 1Year		1-3Years		3-5Years		MoreThan 5Years
Long Term Debt	$	~~182~~180,~~500~~000	$	10,000	$	20,000	$	~~152~~150,~~500~~000	$	—
Operating Leases		~~874~~737		~~506~~394		~~320~~294		4849		—
Purchase Obligations (1)		~~332~~178,~~478~~957		~~332~~178,~~478~~957		—		—		—
Estimated Interest Payments on Debt (2)		3835,~~142~~573		10,~~141~~051		19,~~196~~014		86,~~805~~508		—
Planned Expenditures on Environmental Matters (3)		2,750		950		1,000		800		—
Planned Expenditures on Environmental
Other Long Term Liabilities		760		72		145		145		398
Matters (3)		2,750		950		1,000		800		—
Total	$	557,504	$	354,147	$	40,661	$	162,298	$	398
Other Long Term Liabilities		742		72		145		56		469
Total	$	398,759	$	200,424	$	40,453	$	157,413	$	469

(1) Amounts relate to contractual commitments to purchase $~~322~~161.42 million of steel slabs, of which $5222.31 million ~~are~~is from a related party, material commitments for capital expenditures of $914.21 million, and the remaining $~~900~~3.7 ~~thousand~~million in assorted other contractual commitments.

(2)	Amounts represent the annual accrued interest on our $150.0 million ten-year, 6.125% senior unsecured notes, which are due and payable in March 2014 and the interest on our $40.0 million five-year unsecured term loan maturing in April 2013.

(3) Amounts reflect $950 thousand of self assessed environmental clean-up of our facility and $1.8 million of anticipated expenditures on environmental matters pursuant to a proposed remediation plan submitted to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. See discussion in Note 45 to the Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

We describe our significant accounting policies in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There has been no change in our significant accounting policies since the end of 2009.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (ASU 2010-6”). This update amended guidance and issued a clarification with regard to disclosure requirements about fair market value measurement. A reporting entity is required to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, for measurements utilizing significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. We adopted ASU 2010-6 on January 1, 2010. There was no impact upon adoption of ASU 2010-6 to our financial position or results of operations.

required to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, for measurements utilizing significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. We adopted ASU 2010-6 on January 1, 2010. There was no impact upon adoption of ASU 2010-6 to our financial position or results of operations.

Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), provide a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their companies. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements and may be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” and other words and terms of similar meaning. Such statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. A variety of factors could cause our future results to differ materially from the anticipated results expressed in such forward-looking statements. Readers should review Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for a description of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The following risk factors may affect our operating results and the environment within which we conduct our business:

• Fluctuations in raw materials and freight prices as a result of changes in industry dynamics, increased oil prices and global steel consumption;

•

Our substantial indebtedness, interest expense and principal repayment obligations under our credit facility, when drawn upon, and 6.125% senior notes, which could limit its ability to use operating cash flow in our business other than for debt-servicing obligations, obtain additional financing and react to changing market and general conditions, and which increase our vulnerability to interest rate increases;

•

The possibility of deadlocks among our board of directors that could result in delays in making important business decisions which could result in a competitive disadvantage due to the size of the board currently consisting of four members as elected by our two stockholders, each of whom holds 50% of our stock;

•

Fluctuations in commodity prices for our electricity and natural gas requirements, as well as the viability of the electrical power distribution system within the State of California;

•

Possible adverse effects resulting from new U.S. trade measures or increases in tariffs on imported steel slab;

•

Competitive factors and pricing pressures;

•

The ability to control costs and maintain quality;

•

Future expenditures for capital projects;

•

Fluctuations in the cost of management and hourly labor or other resources necessary to successfully operate our manufacturing plant;

•

Our ability to raise prices sufficiently to offset cost increases, including increased costs for minimum wages, employee benefits and insurance arrangements;

•

Legal claims and litigation against us;

•

Changes in, or any failure to comply with, governmental regulations;

• Industry-wide market factors and general economic and business conditions; changes in general economic, demographic, geopolitical or public safety conditions which affect consumer behavior and spending for the products which use our goods, including the ongoing armed conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan and security concerns related to the continuing response of governments to the threat of terrorism and instability in certain regions of the world; and

demographic, geopolitical or public safety conditions which affect consumer behavior and spending for the products which use our goods, including the ongoing armed conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan and security concerns related to the continuing response of governments to the threat of terrorism and instability in certain regions of the world; and

•

Changes in accounting standards or interpretations of existing standards adopted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that could impact our reported financial results.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are exposed to market risks, including interest rates and utility consumption rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Floating rate credit facility

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, there were no borrowings on our $110.0 million floating rate credit facility. The carrying value of the floating rate credit facility approximates fair value as the interest rate is variable and resets frequently. Changes in interest rates generally do not affect the fair value of our credit facility, but do affect earnings and cash flow. The credit facility bears interest at the Eurodollar rate or the prime rate, which was approximately 1.15275% (one month rate) (including margin) and 3.25%, respectively, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. We expect to borrow approximately $6367.0 million from our credit facility during the remainder of fiscal 2010. We estimate that the average amount of debt outstanding under the facility for the ~~remaining~~remainder of fiscal 2010 will be approximately $2527.06 million. Therefore, a one-percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an increase in interest expense of $~~250,000~~276 thousand for the year. We do not manage the interest rate risk on our credit facility through the use of derivative instruments.

Fixed rate debt

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, our short-term and long-term fixed rate debt comprised of our $150.0 million senior notes and $40.0 million term loan of which $30.0 million is outstanding at June 30, 2010. Changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt instruments. We do not have an obligation to repay our senior notes prior to maturity and, as a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair value should not have a significant impact on us. We believe that the interest rate on our term loan approximates the current rate available for similar types of financing and as a result the carrying amount approximates the fair value. We do not manage the interest rate risk on our fixed rate debt through the use of derivative instruments.

We do not believe that the future market rate risk related to our floating rate credit facility and fixed rate debt will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Other Market Risks

Utility consumption rates

Our daily average electrical demand is approximately 35 megawatts to operate production equipment in manufacturing our products. We are currently a full-service bundled utility customer of Southern California Edison. Due to higher projected production in fiscal 2010, our electricity costs are expected to be higher than fiscal 2009 levels. Our electricity costs accounted for 21.7% and 1.9% of our cost of goods sold for the ~~first~~three ~~quarter~~and ofsix ~~fiscal~~months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 3.7% and 2.07% in the same period one year ago.

At full capacity, we generally utilize a daily average of approximately 12,000 million British thermal units, or MMBTUs, of natural gas to produce our products. To stabilize price volatility, we ~~periodically~~regularly use a risk management approach to fix the price on portions of our natural gas requirements up to two years ahead through financial and/or physical hedging arrangements.

We currently have in place fixed price physical purchase agreements for approximately 54% of our natural gas commodity requirements for fiscal 2010. We continue to monitor the near and long term price trends of natural gas and may enter into ~~such instruments~~additional purchase agreements when we deem it appropriate or when opportunities present themselves. Our natural gas costs accounted for 21.45% and 1.9% of our cost of goods sold for the ~~first~~three ~~quarter~~and ofsix ~~fiscal~~months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 12.89% and 2.2% in the same period one year ago.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

For the period ending ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 (the “Evaluation Date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration (the principal finance and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

11Additionally, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration determined, as of June 30, 2010, that there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

President, Finance and Administration (the principal finance and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Additionally, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration determined, as of March 31, 2010, that there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

The Exhibits required to be filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Exhibit Index included herein immediately following the Signature Page.

1314

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

1415

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended by Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation filed June 6, 1984 with the Delaware Secretary of State, as amended by the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation filed on August 2, 1984 with the Delaware Secretary of State, as amended by the Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation file on January 12, 1988 with the Delaware Secretary of State, and, as amended by the Certificate of Ownership merging CSI Tubular Products, Inc. into the Registrant filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 20, 1993. (1)
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation filed July 27, 1999, with the Delaware Secretary ~~ofState~~of State. (2)
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation filed July 24, 2006, with the Delaware Secretary ~~ofState~~of State. (3)
3.4		Restated Bylaws of the Registrant dated as of April 1, 2008. (7)
4.1		Indenture, dated as of March 22, 2004, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee. (4)
4.2		Specimen Series A note – 6.125% Senior Notes due 2014 (included in Exhibit 4.4). (4)
4.3		Shareholders’ Agreement, dated April 1, 2008, by and among Rio Doce Limited, Vale (Companhia Vale do Rio Doce), JFE Steel Corporation. (8)
10.1		Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of September 29, 2005 by and among California Steel Industries, Inc., Mizuho Corporate Bank, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., Citibank (West), FSB and Wells Fargo Bank. (5)
10.2		Term Loan Agreement dated March 28, 2008 by and among California Steel Industries, Inc., and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. (6)
31.1		Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Executive Vice President, Finance and ~~Chief~~Administration ~~Financial Officer~~ pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Executive Vice President, Finance and ~~Chief~~Administration ~~Financial Officer~~ pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-79587, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 28, 1999, as amended.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 27, 2006.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2004.

(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2005.

(6)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as file with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 25, 2008.

(7)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2008.

(8)	Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2009.

Filing Compare · CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES INC