Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~July~~September 430, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-21794

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Massachusetts

04-3186494

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


175 Crossing Boulevard, Framingham, Massachusetts		01702
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(508) 620-9700

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at ~~July~~October 22, 2010
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		30,~~444~~459,~~645~~835

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding future revenues, research and development programs, clinical trials, possible strategic transactions and collaborations and our future cash requirements. The words or phrases “will”, “will likely result”, “are expected to”, “will continue”, “is anticipated”, “estimate”, “project”, “potential”, “believe”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “intend”, or similar expressions and variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts are based on our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates, forecasts and projections for our business and the industry and markets related to our business. The statements contained in this report are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in such forward-looking statements. Important factors which may affect future revenues, research and development programs, clinical trials and collaborations and our future cash requirements include, without limitation, continued operating losses, our ability to raise additional capital, technology risks to our transgenically produced products, the performance of our collaboration partners and continuation of our collaborations, our ability to enter into collaborations in the future and the terms of such collaborations, regulatory approval of our transgenically produced products, preclinical and clinical testing of our transgenically produced products, and those factors set forth in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as supplemented and amended by the “Risk Factors” contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this Quarterly Report to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based, except as may be required by law.

NOTE REGARDING REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

On May 26, 2009 we effected a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock. In order to provide accurate comparisons of our financial position as of the end of the quarterly period ended July 4, 2010 to prior periods, we have adjusted certain stock amounts and conversion prices of prior periods to accurately reflect the impact of the reverse stock split on our outstanding common stock.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	~~PAGE #~~	PAGE #
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
~~ITEM 1—Financial Statements~~	4ITEM 1—Financial Statements		4
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 4, 2010, and January 3, 2010	4
	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010, and January 3, 2010		4
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Three Months and Fiscal Six Months Ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009	5
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Three Months and Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and September 27, 2009		5
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Six Months Ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009	6
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and September 27, 2009		6
~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements~~	7Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		7
~~ITEM 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~	15ITEM 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15
~~ITEM 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~	20ITEM 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		20
~~ITEM 4—Controls and Procedures~~	20ITEM 4—Controls and Procedures		20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
~~ITEM 1—Legal Proceedings~~	21ITEM 1—Legal Proceedings		22
~~ITEM 6—Exhibits~~	22ITEM 6—Exhibits		23
SIGNATURES	23		24

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands except share amounts)

	July 4,2010			January 3,2010
	September 30, 2010			January 3, 2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	62,~~220~~738		$	3,816
Accounts receivable and unbilled contract revenue		~~222~~395			243
Related party receivable		~~891~~2,417			1,500
Inventory		—379			56
Restricted cash		~~599~~449			599
Other receivable- arbitration award		4,032			—
Other current assets		938			1,217
Other current assets		1,021			1,217
Total current assets		7,316			7,431
Total current assets		12,985			7,431
Net property, plant and equipment		11,873			12,456
Net property, plant and equipment		11,837			12,456
Intangible assets, net		4,671			5,348
Intangible assets, net		4,897			5,348
Other assets		600			765
Other assets		669			765
Total assets	$	24,460		$	26,000
Total assets	$	30,388		$	26,000
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	74,~~342~~689		$	6,~~945~~295
Accrued liabilities		87,~~557~~596			6,~~685~~029
Short-term deferred contract revenue		10,353			6,875
Related party payable		1,300			650
Short-term deferred contract revenue		1,477			6,875
Derivative liability		—			2,660
Current portion of long-term debt		2526			51
Current portion of debt to related party		~~302~~—			300
Total current liabilities		2615,~~579~~088			2322,~~516~~860
Accrued interest related party		1,457			656
Long-term deferred contract revenue		—			8,173
Long-term debt, net of current portion		4135			54
Long-term debt to related party, net of debt discount		31,~~106~~638			16,704
Other long-term liabilities		20			37
Total liabilities		5748,~~746~~238			48,484
Redeemable convertible preferred stock:
Series E-1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred stock, net of offering costs; $.01 par value; 18,000 shares authorized and 6,000 shares were issued and outstanding at January 3, 2010		—			4,223
Series E-2 Redeemable Convertible Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 20,250 shares authorized and 6,750 shares were issued and outstanding at January 3, 2010		—			4,370
Related party subscription receivable		—			(6,375	)
Total redeemable convertible preferred stock		—			2,218
Shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized: 15,000 shares were designated as Series D convertible preferred stock; 115 were issued and outstanding at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010		—			—
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized: 15,000 shares were designated as Series D convertible preferred stock; 115 were issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and January 3, 2010		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 210,000,000 shares authorized; 30,443,535 and 24,727,010 shares were issued and outstanding at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively		304			247
Common stock, $.01 par value; 210,000,000 shares authorized; 30,459,485 and 24,727,010 shares were issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively		304			247
Capital in excess of par value		309,~~215~~273			303,869
Accumulated deficit		(~~336~~333,~~877~~355	)		(328,818	)
Total shareholders’ deficit		(2723,~~358~~778	)		(24,702	)
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ deficit	$	3024,~~388~~460		$	26,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

	Fiscal three months ended						Fiscal ~~six~~nine months ended
	July 4,2010			June 28,2009			July 4,2010			June 28,2009
	September 30,2010			September 27,2009			September 30,2010			September 27,2009
Revenues:
Service revenue	$	~~275~~319		$	~~461~~134		$	~~441~~760		$	~~638~~772
Product revenue		~~4,650~~184			~~194~~615			~~4,830~~581			~~215~~830
Total revenue		4,925			655			5,271			853
Other milestone revenue		8,724			—			13,157			—
Total revenue		9,227			749			14,498			1,602
Costs of revenue and operating expenses:
Cost of service revenue		~~518~~313			~~354~~255			~~526~~839			~~620~~875
Cost of product revenue		3321			16299			5374			16315
Research and development		53,~~150~~344			67,~~805~~141			913,~~918~~262			1320,~~773~~914
Selling, general and administrative		21,~~750~~442			32,~~136~~600			56,~~533~~975			58,~~645~~245
Total cost of revenue and operating expenses		85,~~451~~120			10,~~311~~295			1621,~~030~~150			2030,~~054~~349
Operating loss		(3,526	)		(9,656	)		(10,759	)		(19,201	)
Operating profit (loss)		4,107			(9,546	)		(6,652	)		(28,747	)
Other income (expense):
Interest income		—			20—			—			21
Interest expense		(~~581~~625	)		(~~1,201~~695	)		(1,~~095~~721	)		(2,~~011~~706	)
Other income (expense)		~~3,795~~40			805,331			3,~~795~~836			805,411
Net loss	$	(312	)	$	(10,757	)	$	(8,059	)	$	(21,111	)
Net income (loss)	$	3,522		$	(4,910	)	$	(4,537	)	$	(26,021	)
Net loss per common share (basic and diluted)	$	(0.01	)	$	(1.03	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(2.03	)
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock		—			(144	)		—			(144	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)		30,434			10,440			30,365			10,424
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	3,522		$	(5,054	)	$	(4,537	)	$	(26,165	)
Net income (loss) per common share
Basic	$	0.12		$	(0.48	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(2.51	)
Diluted	$	0.05		$	(0.48	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(2.51	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic		30,449			10,487			30,392			10,445
Diluted		77,670			10,487			30,392			10,445

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

	Fiscal six months ended
	Fiscal nine months ended
	July 4,2010			June 28,2009
	September 30, 2010			September 27, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss from operations	$	(84,~~059~~537	)	$	(2126,~~111~~021	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,~~069~~579			1,~~095~~642
Stock based compensation		194			490
Non-cash other income		—			(5,299	)
Purchase of in-process research and development		—			1,250
Stock based compensation		250			610
Common stock issuance to GTC savings and retirement plan		329			793
Non-cash interest expense		~~453~~683			~~584~~797
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and unbilled contract revenue		~~630~~(1,069	)		~~137~~(9	)
Inventory		56(323	)		~~540~~740
Other assets and liabilities		~~(3,757~~427	)		(~~1,130~~18	)
Accounts payable		~~397~~(956	)		~~1,444~~(587	)
Accrued liabilities		12,~~872~~368			~~1,390~~676
Deferred contract revenue		(413,~~695~~571	)		5,~~550~~226
Net cash used in operating activities		(1114,~~511~~820	)		(1020,~~218~~200	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		—(320	)		(34171	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		—			(34	)
Restricted cash		150			—
Net cash used in investing activities		(170	)		(171	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long term debt from related party		7,000			—
Proceeds from convertible debt financing from related party		7,000			43,~~026~~922
Net proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		3			18
Proceeds from preferred stock financing from related party		—			7,474
Repayment of long-term debt and capital leases		(88	)		(696	)
Net proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		5			24
Net cash provided by financing activities		13,915			3,348
Repayment of long-term debt and capital leases		(93	)		(939	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,404			(6,904	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		13,912			10,481
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,078	)		(9,890	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,816			11,643
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	62,~~220~~738		$	41,~~739~~753
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Release of restricted cash for repayment of long-term debt	$	—		$	4,000
Conversion of LFB debt, net of debt discount	$	—		$	4,512
Release of restricted cash for repayment of long-term debt		—			4,000
Settlement of liability due to LFB conversion to convertible note		—			513
Settlement of liability due to vendor converted to promissory note		—			644
Reclassification of warrants to liability		—			96
Assets purchased under capital lease		—			159
Change in fair value of the option associated with the LFB July 2009 redeemable convertible preferred stock financing		—			(5,299	)
Merrimack preferred stock in consideration for AFP license		—			1,250

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation:

These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc., or GTC, for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010 (referred to as the 2009 Form 10-K) and the financial statements and footnotes included therein. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

Our significant accounting policies are the same as described in Note 2 to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2009 Form 10-K. The financial statements for the fiscal ~~six~~nine months ended ~~July~~September 430, 2010 and ~~June~~September 2827, 2009, are unaudited but include, in our opinion, ~~all~~ all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. We have reclassified amounts on the balance sheet between current and long-term liabilities for the prior period presented. These adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. Comprehensive loss is substantially the same as our net loss.

In July 2010, ~~our~~the Board of Directors amended ~~approved a change in~~ our ~~fiscal~~2010 year end date from January 2, 2011 to December 31, 2010 and a change in the end of the third fiscal quarter from October 3, 2010 to September 30, 2010, reflecting a change to the calendar year end reporting cycle.

We are subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry, including, but not limited to, the uncertainties of clinical trials and the regulatory requirements for approval of therapeutic compounds, dependence on existing and new collaborations, the need for additional capital, competitive new technologies, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, and compliance with the regulations of the United States Food and Drug Administration and other governmental agencies.

Under our Joint Development and Commercialization Agreement with LFB Biotechnologies, S.A.S., or LFB, a related party, we have established LFB/GTC LLC as a separate legal entity for the joint venture. Our investment in the joint venture is being accounted for at cost based on our ownership percentage and is not being consolidated as we are not the primary beneficiary of the joint venture. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider a number of factors, including our ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the entity’s economic success, our contractual rights and responsibilities under the arrangement and the significance of the arrangement to each party. These considerations impact the way we account for our existing collaborative and joint venture relationships and may result in the future consolidation of companies or entities with which we have collaborative or other arrangements.

Our consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that we are a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of business, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. We have incurred losses from operations and negative operating cash flow since inception and have an accumulated deficit of approximately $~~337~~333 million at ~~July~~ September 430, 2010. We also have negative working capital of $137.68 million as of ~~July~~September 430, 2010. Based on our cash balance as of ~~July~~September 430, 2010, as well as potential cash receipts ~~from~~primarily ~~existing programs and~~ from the ~~$3.7~~funding ~~million~~ of ~~cash~~programs ~~received, net~~under ~~of expenses, from~~ the ~~award~~LFB ~~in the LEO arbitration in July 2010~~collaboration, we believe our capital resources will be sufficient to fund operations to the middle of ~~the~~December ~~fourth quarter~~ of 2010. Our recurring losses from operations and limited funds raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our plans with regard to this matter include seeking additional financing arrangement and seeking collaboration arrangements. If no funds are available to us through these channels, we would have to sell or liquidate the business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the amount of reclassification of liabilities, or any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Our primary sources of additional capital raised have been equity financings and debt financings. Management expects that future sources of funding may include new or expanded partnering arrangements and additional sales of equity or debt securities. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed has had a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies. If adequate funds do not become available we may be required to take further steps to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our research and development programs, reduce our planned commercialization efforts, or obtain funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain product candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently. Additionally, any future equity funding would dilute ownership of our existing equity investors. We are currently engaged in discussions for potential new partnering transactions, ~~and~~ service contracts and plan to bring further financial resources into GTC in the future through some combination of partnering transactions, ~~service contracts~~ and other debt or equity financing arrangements. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into anticipated partnering arrangements, or raise additional capital, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On October 15, 2010, LFB sent a letter to the independent members of our board of directors indicating that LFB’s Board of Directors had approved LFB making an offer to take us private for $0.28 per share. The going private transaction, as proposed by LFB, would be structured as follows: LFB would purchase approximately 61 million shares of our common stock in a private placement for $0.28 per share, or an aggregate purchase price of approximately $17 million. After completion of the proposed private placement and conversion of convertible preferred stock of GTC owned by LFB, LFB would own at least 90% of our outstanding common stock. Following the private placement, LFB would effect a short-form merger in accordance with Massachusetts law cashing out all minority shareholders for $0.28 per share. Once this transaction is completed we would no longer be required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Net Loss per Common Share:

Per share information is based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consisting of warrants, stock options and stock to be issued under our defined contribution retirement plan totaled 5.86 million shares and 5.4 million shares at ~~July~~September 430, 2010 and ~~June~~September 2827, 2009, respectively. ~~Since~~Although we had net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010, we were in a net loss position at ~~July~~September 430, 2010. Since we had net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010, these potential common shares were used to compute diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Since we were in a net loss position for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and ~~June~~September 2827, 2009, these potential common shares were not used to compute diluted loss per share, as the effect was antidilutive. We also have ~~three~~four convertible notes payable to LFB. The first convertible note has a current principal balance of approximately $~~735~~753,000, net of unamortized debt discount of approximately $~~108~~89,000, which automatically converts into shares of our common stock in conjunction with any future common stock offerings at the per ~~share~~ share offering price of the respective offering. The second convertible note has a current principal balance of approximately $13.35 million, net of unamortized debt discount of approximately $~~284~~248,000 which may be converted into our common stock at $3.10 per share at LFB’s discretion. The third convertible note has a current principal balance of approximately $7 million,~~000,000,~~ which may be converted into our common stock of $0.42 per share at LFB’s discretion. The fourth convertible note has a current principal balance of approximately $7 million which LFB may convert into shares of our common stock in conjunction with any future common stock offering at a per share price of the respective offering. See Note 34 below for further discussion on our relationship with LFB.

3. ~~Business~~Loss ~~Agreements~~Per Share:


	For the fiscal three months ended September 30, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Net income available to common shareholders			$	3,522
Plus: Income impact of assumed conversions
Interest on convertible debt	$	522


Effect of assumed conversions				522

Net income available to common shareholders + assumed conversions			$	4,044


Weighted-average shares				30,449
Plus: Incremental shares from assumed conversions
Convertible debt		47,221


Dilutive potential common shares				47,221

Adjusted weighted-average shares				77,670

Diluted EPS			$	0.05

Options to purchase 797,324 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.42 to $177.50 per share were outstanding during the third quarter of 2010. We also had 4,356,826 warrants at exercise prices ranging from $3.10 to $20.50 per share outstanding during the third quarter of 2010. Neither the options or the warrants were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.

4. Business Agreements:

Lundbeck Inc. (formerly OVATION Pharmaceuticals)

In June 2008, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Lundbeck Inc., or Lundbeck, to develop and market ATryn® in the United States. The collaboration agreement included the commercialization of ATryn® in the hereditary antithrombin deficiency, or HD, indication and the further development of ATryn® in acquired antithrombin deficiency indications, or AD. Under the terms of the agreement, Lundbeck was obligated to make milestone payments to us for a total of $9 million through the approval of ATryn® for HD in the U.S., all of which were paid. We recorded the $9 million in total milestones received as deferred revenue, which is being recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the 20 year life of the agreement beginning with the first shipment of product to Lundbeck, which began in the first quarter of 2009. Since Lundbeck has a right of return on our first shipment of product , we are deferring the recognition of this product revenue until this product has been sold to end users. At July 4, 2010, we have approximately $520,000 in deferred revenue related to product shipped to Lundbeck with a right of return. The collaboration anticipates further development of ATryn® in larger market acquired deficiencies of antithrombin, such as the treatment of heparin resistance, or HR, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery that requires the use of a cardio pulmonary bypass (CPB) machine, as well as the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation, or DIC, associated with severe sepsis. We have recorded $1.5 million of product revenue and approximately $70,000 of royalty revenue associated with product shipped to Lundbeck that has been sold to end users.

In July 2010, we signed a definitive agreement with Lundbeck whereby we regained commercialization rights to ATryn® in the U.S. and terminated our collaboration with Lundbeck. The agreement includes a defined transition period of up to six months wherein Lundbeck will perform certain services on our behalf in order to ensure that ATryn® will continue to be available to physicians and their patients in an uninterrupted fashion as commercialization responsibilities are smoothly transitioned to us. We will pay Lundbeck a fixed monthly fee for sales and pharma-covigilance activities during the transition period and pay them for the direct distribution costs they incur plus a small mark up. Thereafter, Lundbeck will earn a royalty on net sales beginning in two years, with a predefined cumulative maximum. As a result of the termination of our previous collaboration agreement with Lundbeck, we ~~anticipate~~recognized the ~~recognition~~remaining of deferred revenue of approximately $8.97 million in the third quarter of 2010 related to our obligation under the ~~Lundbeck~~previous collaboration agreement into ~~the~~supply ~~third~~ATryn® ~~quarter~~to ~~of 2010~~Lundbeck. As part of the agreement we ~~will~~purchased ~~purchase~~ Lundbeck’s remaining inventory of ATryn® for total consideration of $400,000, $200,000 of which iswas ~~to be~~ paid upon the effective date of the agreement and the remaining $200,000 to be paid on the last day of the transition period. The fair value of the inventory purchased was well in excess of the consideration to be paid, and as a result the full $400,000 we paid for the inventory was allocated to the cost of the inventory.

LFB Biotechnologies

Collaboration Agreement

In September 2006, we entered into a collaboration agreement with LFB, a related party, to develop selected recombinant plasma proteins and MAbs using our transgenic production platform. LFB is a subsidiary of LFB S.A., a vertically integrated plasma fractionation company based in France that currently markets 19 plasma-derived products in the areas of hemostasis, anesthesia-intensive care and immunology. LFB S.A. is a for-profit company currently 100% owned by the French government. The first program in this collaboration is for the development of a transgenically derived recombinant human factor FVIIa (for the treatment of hemophilia). We have subsequently added to the LFB collaboration programs to develop a transgenically derived recombinant form of human factor IX, an antibody to the CD20 immune system receptor (for use in the treatment of certain cancers and autoimmune diseases), and transgenically derived recombinant human alpha-1 antitrypsin (for use in the treatment of a form of emphysema).

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

transgenically derived recombinant human factor FVIIa (for the treatment of hemophilia). We have subsequently added to the LFB collaboration programs to develop a transgenically derived recombinant form of human factor IX, an antibody to the CD20 immune system receptor (for use in the treatment of certain cancers and autoimmune diseases), and transgenically derived recombinant human alpha-1 antitrypsin (for use in the treatment of a form of emphysema).

2010 Debt Financings

On February 24, 2010, we issued and sold a $7,000,000 secured note to LFB and received $7,000,000 in gross proceeds. The secured note has a 36-month term and accrues interest at a rate of 4%, with a single payment of principal and interest at maturity. After January 1, 2011 LFB may annually adjust the rate of interest upwards or downwards, based on LFB’s then-current cost of capital, as determined by LFB in the exercise of its commercially reasonable discretion. Over the term of the secured note LFB may elect to participate in any of our future equity financing transactions by cancelling all or any portion of the principal and interest outstanding under the secured note for any shares of our common stock or securities convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into shares of our common stock that we issue and sell in the financing. On February 24, 2010, we also entered into amendments to modify our existing security agreements with LFB to add the 2010 secured note to our debt that is secured by a first priority security interest on all of our assets, including our intellectual property, but excluding livestock.

On June 15, 2010, we issued and sold a $7,000,000 secured convertible note to LFB and received $7,000,000 in gross proceeds. The ~~secured~~ secured convertible note has a 36-month term and accrues interest at a rate of 4%, with a single payment of principal and interest at maturity. After January 1, 2011, LFB may annually adjust the rate of interest upwards or downwards, based on LFB’s then-current cost of capital, as determined by LFB in the exercise of its commercially reasonable discretion. LFB may convert the debt into our common stock at a conversion price of $0.42 per share at any time. Over the term of the secured note LFB may also elect to participate in any of our future equity financing transactions by cancelling all or any portion of the principal and interest outstanding under the secured note for any shares of our common stock or securities convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into shares of our common stock that we issue and sell in the financing. On June 15, 2010, we also entered into amendments to modify our existing security agreements with LFB to add the 2010 secured convertible note to our debt that is secured by a first priority security interest on all of our assets, including our intellectual property, but excluding livestock.

Potential Going Private Transaction

JCOM Co. Ltd (“JCOM”)

In February 2009, we entered into a license and development agreement with JCOM, an affiliate of Dong-A Pharmaceuticals (a leading pharmaceutical company in South Korea), whereby we granted to JCOM an option for an exclusive license for Asia and a separate option for a co-exclusive license for the rest of the world, under our patent and know-how rights to make, use, sell, offer for sale and import recombinant human insulin products in these territories. We are developing cell lines to demonstrate production of recombinant human insulin for JCOM. The agreement contemplates the subsequent establishment of a transgenic production system in South Korea. During the first quarter of 2009, we received $750,000 from JCOM, which was recorded as deferred revenue ~~which~~and will be recognized as revenue when JCOM either exercises its options for Asia and the rest of the world or when the options expire, whichever comes first.

~~PharmAthene, Inc~~5. ~~(“PharmAthene”)~~Inventory:

InInventory ~~March~~consists ~~2007,~~of wefinished ~~entered~~goods ~~into~~at aSeptember 30, ~~process~~2010 and ~~development and clinical supply manufacturing services agreement with PharmAthene for Protexia®~~January 3, as2010. ~~well~~Inventories ason anhand ~~agreement~~were ~~providing~~related ~~PharmAthene an expanded license~~ to ~~our patent rights~~ATryn®, which ~~will support~~has ~~the~~been ~~further~~approved ~~development, manufacturing, regulatory approval and commercialization process~~ for ~~PharmAthene’s Protexia®~~commercial ~~program.~~sale ~~The~~in ~~development of Protexia® is funded by~~ the ~~United~~U.S. ~~States~~and ~~Department of Defense~~Europe.

~~LEO~~We ~~Pharma~~carry ~~A/S~~inventory ~~(“LEO”)~~at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method. We expect that all inventory capitalized will be sold for clinical trials or commercial use. Up through July 4, 2010, because we had only one customer, we only capitalized inventory if orders had been received. If at any time we believed that the sale of inventory is no longer probable, we charge the inventory to expense. Because our cost of production to date has exceeded our agreed upon maximum price, we have expensed these excess costs as they were incurred.

InAs ~~March~~noted ~~2009~~above, we ~~notified~~regained ~~LEO~~the ~~that~~U.S. wecommercialization ~~were~~rights ~~terminating our 2005 collaboration agreement with LEO pursuant~~ to ATryn® ~~the~~in ~~terms~~July of2010 ~~the agreement~~ and ~~the termination~~purchased ~~became~~Lundbeck’s ~~final~~remaining ~~upon~~inventory ~~issuance~~ of ~~the arbitration award in our favor in July 2010~~ATryn®. ~~(see Note 12).~~

4We analyze our inventory levels quarterly and will write-down inventory that is expected to expire prior to sale, inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value and inventory in excess of expected requirements. ~~Inventory:~~Expired inventory will be disposed of, and the related costs will be written off. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-offs may be required. Also, if we should need to use a portion of the capitalized inventory for clinical trials, we would expense the inventory when it was designated for use in such clinical trial.

Inventory consists of finished goods at January 3, 2010. Inventories on hand were related to ATryn®, which has been approved for commercial sale in the U.S. and Europe.

We carry inventory at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method. We expect that all inventory capitalized will be sold for clinical trials or commercial use. Up through July 4, 2010, because we had only one customer, we only capitalized inventory if orders had been received. If at any time we believed that the sale of inventory was no longer probable, we charged the inventory to expense. Because our cost of production exceeded our agreed upon maximum price, we expensed these excess costs as they were incurred.

As noted above, we regained the U.S. commercialization rights to ATryn® in July 2010 and agreed to purchase Lundbeck’s remaining inventory of ATryn®.

We analyze our inventory levels quarterly and will write-down inventory that is expected to expire prior to sale, inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value and inventory in excess of expected

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~requirements~~6. ~~Expired~~Accrued ~~inventory will be disposed of, and the related costs will be written off. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional~~Liabilities: inventory write-offs may be required. Also, if we should need to use a portion of the capitalized inventory for clinical trials, we would expense the inventory when it was designated for use in such clinical trial.

5. Accrued Liabilities:

Accrued liabilities included the following:

	(dollars in thousands)
	At July 4,2010		At January 3,2010
	At September 30,2010			At January 3,2010
Accrued payroll and benefits	$	1,~~036~~093	$	~~1,810~~$	1,810
Accrued severance		21,~~036~~541		~~159~~	159
Accrued bonuses		1,~~081~~334		~~1,172~~	1,172
Other		4,404		3,544
Accrued interest related party (1)		1,457			656
Total accrued expenses	$	8,557	$	6,685
Other		3,628			2,888
Total accrued expenses	$	9,053		$	6,685

In(1) ~~November~~The ~~2009,~~accrued weinterest ~~announced~~related aparty ~~restructuring~~represents ofinterest ~~our~~accrued ~~organization~~on ~~to meet the requirements of~~ our ~~key~~convertible ~~programs~~notes and ~~extend~~promissory ~~the~~notes ~~duration~~with ofLFB ~~our~~(see ~~cash~~Note ~~resources~~9). Under the restructuring plan, headcount was reduced by approximately 30% from 154 to 109 full time equivalent employees. This restructuring included employees from most departments located at both our Framingham and central Massachusetts locations. During the fourth quarter of 2009 we recorded severance expense in the amount of $460,000 of which approximately $374,000 and $86,000 was recorded to research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively. At January 3, 2010 approximately $159,000 remained in accrued liabilities all of which was paid out during the first six months of 2010. There are no further accrued liabilities in relation to unpaid severance costs for the November restructuring.

In ~~June~~November ~~2010~~2009, we ~~implemented~~announced a ~~further~~ restructuring of our ~~operations~~organization asto ~~part~~meet ofthe anrequirements ~~initiative~~of ~~to narrow~~ our ~~strategic and operational focus to three~~ key ~~areas; FVIIa,~~ ~~ATryn®,~~programs and ~~our~~extend ~~bio-superiors product portfolio. This restructuring maintained~~ the ~~key~~duration ~~employee~~of ~~base to achieve these objectives while significantly decreasing~~ our ~~on-going~~cash ~~financial resource requirements~~resources. Under ~~this~~the restructuring plan, headcount was reduced by approximately 4430% from ~~109~~154 to 61109 full time equivalent employees. This restructuring included employees from most departments located at both our Framingham and central Massachusetts locations~~, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer~~. ~~Board member William Heiden was named Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President.~~ During the ~~second~~ fourth quarter of ~~2010,~~2009 we recorded severance expense in the amount of ~~approximately~~ $~~2.2 million~~460,000 of which approximately $~~800~~374,000 and $~~1.4~~86,000 ~~million~~was ~~were~~ recorded to research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively. ~~During~~At ~~the~~January 3, ~~second quarter of~~ 2010, approximately $~~137~~159,000 ~~was~~remained ~~paid~~in ~~out~~accrued liabilities all of ~~the~~which ~~severance~~was ~~reserve~~paid ~~related~~out toduring ~~this~~the ~~restructuring~~first ~~and~~six ~~approximately~~months $2of ~~million~~2010. ~~remained~~There inare no further accrued liabilities in relation to unpaid severance costs for the ~~June~~ ~~2010~~November ~~restructuring,~~2009 ~~which will be paid out through the third quarter of 2011~~restructuring.

6In June 2010, we implemented a further restructuring of our operations as part of an initiative to narrow our strategic and operational focus to three key areas; FVIIa, ATryn®, and our bio-superiors product portfolio. ~~Intangible~~This ~~Assets:~~restructuring maintained the key employee base to achieve these objectives while significantly decreasing our on-going financial resource requirements. Under this restructuring plan, headcount was reduced by approximately 44% from 109 to 61 employees. This restructuring included employees from most departments located at both our Framingham and central Massachusetts locations, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Board member William K. Heiden was named Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. During the second quarter of 2010, we recorded severance expense in the amount of approximately $2.2 million, of which approximately $800,000 and $1.4 million were recorded to research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively. During the third quarter of 2010, we recorded additional severance expense in the amount of approximately $163,000 for one additional employee headcount reduction. During the second and third quarters of 2010, approximately $796,000 was paid out of the severance reserve related to this restructuring and approximately $1.5 million remained in accrued liabilities at September 30, 2010 in relation to unpaid severance costs for the June 2010 restructuring, which will be paid out through the third quarter of 2011.

~~Our intangible assets consist of marketing rights and technology licenses with amortization lives between 9 years and 15 years~~7. ~~Amortization~~Intangible ~~expense~~Assets: ~~was approximately $225,000 for each of the fiscal three-month periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009 and $451,000 for each of the six-month periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009.~~

Our intangible assets consist of marketing rights and technology licenses with amortization lives between 9 years and 15 years. Amortization expense was approximately $225,000 for each of the fiscal three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and September 27, 2009 and $676,000 for each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and September 27, 2009.

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for all our intangible assets over the next five years is as follows:

	(dollars in thousands)
Six months remaining in 2010	$	451
Three months remaining in 2010	$	225
2011	$	902
2012	$	902
2013	$	902
2014	$	902

78. Redeemable Convertible ~~Preferred~~ Preferred Stock:

On January 8, 2010, LFB converted 12,750 shares of Series E Preferred Stock, representing all of the remaining shares of our Series E Preferred Stock that were then outstanding, into a total of 5,299,071 shares of our common stock. As a result of the conversion, the derivative liability of approximately $2.7 million was credited against additional paid in capital.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of ~~July~~ September 430, 2010, on an as converted basis, LFB beneficially owned approximately 82% of our common stock through its holdings of common stock, convertible debt and Series D preferred stock, exclusive of its warrants and options.

89. Long-Term Debt:

Our long-term debt consisted of the following:

	(dollars in thousands)
	July 4,2010			January 3,2010
	September 30,2010			January 3,2010
Capital leases, with monthly payments of approximately $3 through May 2014	$	6660		$	76
Convertible note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 2%, net of debt discount(1)		~~734~~753			698
Convertible note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%(3), net of debt discount(2)		13,~~323~~535			12,907
Promissory note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%(3)(4)		3,351			3,400
Promissory note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%		7,000			—
Convertible note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%		7,000			—
Other debt		—			28
		31,474			17,109
		31,699			17,109
Less current portion		(~~327~~26	)		(351	)
	$	31,~~147~~673		$	16,758

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

2010	$	~~327~~26
2011		17,~~131~~661
2012		14,~~010~~007
2013		65
	$	31,~~474~~699

(1) Based on our effective borrowing rate of 10.8%, we recorded a debt discount of approximately $1.1 million for the difference between the stated interest rate and the effective borrowing rate. The debt discount is being amortized over the five-year term of the note. The debt discount balance as of ~~July~~September 30, 2010 is approximately $~~108~~89,000.

(2) We recorded a debt discount of approximately $500,000 for the expenses incurred by us on LFB’s behalf. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of the note. The debt discount balance as of ~~July~~September 430, 2010 is approximately $~~284~~248,000.

⁽³⁾	In December 2009, we amended the convertible note and promissory note reducing the interest rate to 4% from 8% and 10.8%, respectively, effective January 1, 2010.

(4) As of July 4, 2010, we were in default of our promissory note to LFB as a result of not making principal and interest payments during the second quarter of 2010. In July 2010, we entered into a waiver and amendment to the promissory note whereby LFB waived all defaults under the promissory note, including payment of principal and interest that was due on July 1, 2010 and any penalties and/or interest related thereto. Pursuant to the terms of the waiver and amendment, LFB also waived all cross-defaults under our other debt instruments that were triggered by defaults under the promissory note. The note was amended such that all principal and interest thereunder shall no longer be payable on a monthly basis, but shall instead be due and payable at maturity.

At ~~July~~September 430, 2010 and January 3, 2010, the fair values of all of our material debt instruments were as follows:

	(dollars in thousands)
	At July 4,2010		At January 3,2010
	At September 30,2010			At January 3,2010
Convertible note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 2%	$	~~741~~769	$	~~688~~$	688
Convertible note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%		1719,~~022~~061		~~17,022~~	17,022
Promissory note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%		2,~~798~~924		~~2,802~~	2,802
Promissory note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%		5,~~000~~189		—	—
Convertible note to LFB, fixed annual interest of 4%		45,~~817~~062		—	—

The fair values of our LFB convertible notes and promissory note were calculated using a net present value approach using unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. We used an effective interest rate of 15% in our fair value calculation.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9The fair values of our LFB convertible notes and promissory notes were calculated using a net present value approach using unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. ~~Fair~~We ~~Value:~~used an effective interest rate of 15% in our fair value calculation.

10. Fair Value:

The accounting standards define fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This accounting standard also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

	Fair Value Measure as of July 4, 2010
	Fair Value Measure as of September 30, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Description	Total		~~Level 1~~	Level 1		~~Level 2~~		Level 2	~~Level 3~~		Level 3
Money Market Fund	$	447	$	~~447~~$	447	$	—	$	$—	—	$	—
Total	$	447	$	~~447~~$	447	$	—	$	—	—		—
	Fair Value Measure as of January 3, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Description	Total			Level 1				Level 2			Level 3
Money Market Fund	$	448		$	448			$	—		$	—
Derivative Liability		2,660			—				—			2,660
Total	$	3,108		$	448			$	—		$	2,660

	Fair Value Measure as of January 3, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money Market Fund	$	448	$	448	$	—	$	—
Derivative Liability		2,660		—		—		2,660
Total	$	3,108	$	448	$	—	$	2,660

Given the complex structure of the warrant and derivative liabilities, we engaged a third party consulting firm to assist us with our valuation. We considered and relied in part on the valuation model from the third party consulting firm to establish the fair value for these instruments. The model utilized assumptions for volatility based on our historical volatility and credit spread based on Standard & Poor’s Corporate Ratings criteria. We record all changes in fair value of the derivative to other income (expense).

The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value for which we used Level 3 or significant unobservable inputs at ~~July~~ September 430, 2010 and January 3, 2010 (in thousands):

	January 3,2010 Balance		~~Purchase ofSeries EPreferredStock~~	Purchase ofSeries EPreferredStock		~~FairValue Adjustments~~		FairValueAdjustments	~~Conversion ofSeries EPreferredStock~~			Conversion ofSeries EPreferredStock	~~July 4,2010 Balance~~		September 30,2010 Balance
Derivative Liability	$	2,660	$	—$	—	$	—	$	$—	~~(2,660~~	)	$	$(2,660	—)	$	—
Total	$	2,660	$	—$	—	$	—	$	$—	~~(2,660~~	)	$	$(2,660	—)	$	—

10. Retention Incentive Plan:

In June 2008, we established a Retention Incentive Plan, or Retention Plan, the purpose of which is to encourage the continued employment of our executive officers and other senior personnel through the grant of equity awards and other payments conditioned on continued employment with the Company. Our Compensation Committee is administering the Retention Plan and has the authority to determine the individual participants and the amount of any awards under the Retention Plan. Eligible participants besides our executive officers include Vice Presidents, Senior Directors, Directors and Associate Directors.

Participants in the Retention Plan were eligible to receive awards of restricted stock units issued pursuant to our 2002 Equity Incentive Plan. We granted 61,583 restricted stock units during 2008 and 10,260 in January 2009. The restricted stock units awarded under the Retention Plan vested on June 30, 2009, for all participants who remained our employee until that date.

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~During~~11. ~~the~~Retention ~~second~~Incentive ~~quarter of 2009 and the first six months of 2009, we recorded approximately $84,000~~Plan: ~~and $170,000, respectively, of compensation expense related to the restricted stock units.~~

~~Participants~~In inJune ~~the~~2008, ~~Retention~~we ~~Plan~~established ~~who~~a ~~remained employed~~Retention byIncentive usPlan, ~~through~~or ~~March 31~~Retention Plan, ~~2010~~the ~~also~~purpose ~~received~~of awhich ~~specified~~is ~~cash~~to ~~retention~~encourage ~~payment~~the continued ~~which~~employment ~~was~~of ~~paid~~our ~~out~~executive inofficers ~~April~~and ~~2010.~~other Wesenior ~~accrued~~personnel through the ~~amount~~grant onof aequity ~~straight~~awards ~~line~~and ~~basis~~other ~~over~~payments aconditioned ~~22-month~~on ~~period,~~continued ~~resulting~~employment inwith anthe ~~expense~~Company. ofOur ~~approximately~~Compensation ~~$224,000~~Committee is administering the Retention Plan and ~~during~~has the ~~first~~authority ~~quarter~~to ofdetermine ~~2010~~the individual participants and ~~$210,000~~the ~~during~~amount of any awards under the ~~second~~Retention ~~quarter~~Plan. ofEligible ~~2009~~participants ~~and~~besides ~~approximately~~our ~~$327,000~~executive ~~during~~officers ~~the~~include ~~first~~Vice ~~six~~Presidents, ~~months~~Senior ofDirectors, ~~2009.~~Directors and Associate Directors.

During the first nine months of 2009, we recorded approximately $170,000 of compensation expense related to the restricted stock units.

Participants in the Retention Plan who remained employed by us through March 31, 2010 also received a specified cash retention payment which was paid out in April 2010. We accrued the amount of such cash retention payments on a straight line basis over a 22-month period, resulting in an expense of approximately $135,000 during the third quarter of 2009 and $224,000 and $461,000 during the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

In December 2008, we granted 222,500 stock options to our executive officers and other senior personnel pursuant to a retention plan under our Equity Plan. The options to purchase our common stock are exercisable at a price of $3.10 per share. Fifty percent of the options vested on September 30, 2009 and the remaining options vested on June 30, 2010.

11In July 2010, we implemented a cash incentive program in which certain members of senior management will participate. ~~New~~The ~~Accounting~~potential ~~Pronouncements:~~cash awards under this program will be made in June 2011, if ever, based upon evaluations of performance against a specific list of individual goals for each of the participants. The total potential cash award is approximately $300,000.

12. New Accounting Pronouncements:

In June 2009, the FASB also issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs). The elimination of the concept of a qualified special purpose entity, as discussed above, removes the exception from applying the consolidation guidance within this amendment. This amendment requires an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate a VIE. The amendment also requires an enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement with VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that involvement, as well as how its involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprise’s financial statements. Finally, an enterprise will be required to disclose significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to consolidate a VIE. This amendment is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Our joint venture with LFB involves the development and commercialization of recombinant plasma proteins and MAbs. Our investment in the joint venture is being accounted for at cost based on our ownership percentage and is not being consolidated as we are not the primary beneficiary of the joint venture. Adoption did not have an impact in our consolidated financial statements. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider a number of factors, including our ability to direct the activities that most significantly affect the entity’s economic success, our contractual rights and responsibilities under the arrangement and the significance of the arrangement to each party. These considerations impact the way we account for our existing collaborative and joint venture relationships and may result in the future consolidation of companies or entities with which we have collaborative or other arrangements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update will allow companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling price for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We ~~have~~will ~~not~~adopt ~~yet~~this ~~determined~~update ~~when~~on weJanuary 1, ~~will~~2011. ~~adopt~~We ~~this~~have ~~update~~not oryet determined what the impact will be on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued a standard to further update the fair value measurement guidance to improve fair value measurement disclosures. This update to the standard requires new disclosures related to transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2, as well as activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and provides clarification to existing disclosures. This standard is effective for interim periods and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements as these disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2010. Adoption did not have an impact in our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued a standard to amend the subsequent events guidance. The amendment states that SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. We adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2010. Adoption did not have an impact in our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued updated guidance on the use of the milestone method of revenue recognition that applies to research or development transactions in which one or more payments are contingent upon achieving uncertain future events or circumstances. This update provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance, and we have not yet determined the impact of the standard on our financial position or results of operation, if any

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

12 except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements as these disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~Legal~~We ~~Proceedings:~~adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2010. Adoption did not have an impact in our consolidated financial statements.

In ~~connection~~February ~~with our collaboration with LEO Pharma~~2010, ~~we initiated International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceedings in~~ the ~~fourth~~FASB ~~quarter of~~issued ~~2008~~a ~~and~~standard ~~asked the tribunal~~ to ~~determine~~amend ~~that~~the ~~LEO~~subsequent ~~was~~events ~~not~~guidance. ~~legally~~The ~~entitled~~amendment tostates ~~exercise its contractual remedies on termination for alleged cause and~~ that weSEC ~~were~~filers ~~entitled~~are tono ~~damages~~longer required ~~with respect~~ to ~~LEO’s~~disclose ~~actions. In July 2010,~~ the ~~tribunal in~~date ~~the~~through ~~ICC~~which ~~proceedings~~subsequent ~~issued~~events ~~its~~have ~~final,~~been ~~non-appealable~~evaluated ~~award, finding that we had validly terminated our collaboration agreement with LEO Pharma~~ in ~~March~~originally ~~2009~~issued and ~~awarding~~revised usfinancial ~~a total of approximately $4~~statements.1 ~~million~~We inadopted ~~damages~~this ~~and~~standard ~~costs,~~during ~~which~~the ~~were paid~~first byquarter ~~LEO~~of ~~in July~~ 2010. InAdoption ~~addition,~~did ~~LEO~~not ~~has~~have ~~been~~an ~~ordered~~impact ~~to turn over to us all data related to the Phase II trial that LEO was conducting~~ in ~~patients~~our ~~with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and that was terminated before the planned~~consolidated ~~completion~~financial ~~of the trial~~statements. ~~All of LEO Pharma’s counterclaims in the arbitration were rejected.~~

AsIn aApril 2010, ~~result~~the ofFASB ~~the~~issued ~~determination~~updated byguidance on the ~~ICC that~~use weof ~~validly~~the ~~terminated~~milestone ~~the~~method ~~agreement,~~of werevenue recognition ~~recognized~~that ~~approximately~~applies $4to ~~million~~research ofor ~~revenue,~~development transactions in which ~~had~~one ~~been~~or ~~previously~~more ~~deferred,~~payments ~~associated~~are ~~with~~contingent ~~milestone~~upon ~~payments~~achieving ~~previously~~uncertain ~~paid~~future byevents ~~LEO~~or circumstances. InThis ~~addition,~~update asprovides aguidance ~~result~~on of the ~~award~~criteria ~~issued~~that ~~for~~should ~~damages~~be ~~and~~met for determining ~~costs,~~whether wethe ~~recorded~~milestone amethod ~~$4.1~~of ~~million~~revenue ~~receivable~~recognition inis ~~the~~appropriate. ~~second~~This ~~quarter~~guidance ofis ~~2010,~~effective ofon ~~which~~a ~~$3.8~~prospective ~~million~~basis ~~was~~for ~~recorded~~milestones toachieved ~~other~~in ~~income~~fiscal years, ~~approximately~~and ~~$200~~interim periods within those years,~~000~~ ofbeginning ~~expenses~~on ~~related~~or toafter ~~court~~June 15, ~~costs~~2010. ~~were~~We ~~recorded~~are currently asevaluating anthe ~~offset~~impact toof ~~selling~~this guidance, ~~general~~ and ~~administrative~~ ~~expenses~~we ~~and~~have ~~approximately~~not ~~$100,000~~yet ofdetermined ~~expenses~~the ~~related~~impact toof ~~regulatory~~the ~~fees~~standard ~~were~~on ~~recorded~~our asfinancial anposition ~~offset~~or toresults ~~research~~of ~~and~~operation, ~~development~~if ~~expenses~~any.

~~BioProtein Technologies Company, a French corporation, brought a legal action against LFB and GTC in France on a breach of contract claim regarding a contract between BioProtein and LFB~~13. ~~LFB~~Legal isProceedings: the principal defendant, but we were joined in the lawsuit based on the allegations by BioProtein that we tortiously interfered with an existing contract between LFB and BioProtein. The total claim against both parties is for 31 million euros. We have retained counsel in France, and we will vigorously defend ourselves. However, pursuant to our Joint Commercialization and Development Agreement with LFB, LFB has agreed to fully indemnify us with respect to any legal fees and damages arising from this lawsuit.

In connection with our collaboration with LEO Pharma, we initiated International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceedings in the fourth quarter of 2008 and asked the tribunal to determine that LEO was not legally entitled to exercise its contractual remedies on termination for alleged cause and that we were entitled to damages with respect to LEO’s actions. In July 2010, the tribunal in the ICC proceedings issued its final, non-appealable award, finding that we had validly terminated our collaboration agreement with LEO Pharma in March 2009 and awarding us a total of approximately $4.1 million in damages and costs, which were paid by LEO in July 2010. In addition, LEO has turned over to us all data related to the Phase II trial that LEO was conducting in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and that was terminated before the planned completion of the trial. All of LEO Pharma’s counterclaims in the arbitration were rejected.

As a result of the determination by the ICC that we validly terminated the agreement, we recognized approximately $4 million of revenue, which had been previously deferred, associated with milestone payments previously paid by LEO. In addition, as a result of the award issued for damages and costs, we recorded a $4.1 million receivable in the second quarter of 2010, of which $3.8 million was recorded to other income, approximately $200,000 of expenses related to court costs were recorded as an offset to selling, general and administrative expenses and approximately $100,000 of expenses related to regulatory fees were recorded as an offset to research and development expenses. The $4.1 million was received during the third quarter of 2010.

BioProtein Technologies Company, a French corporation, brought a legal action against LFB and GTC in France on a breach of contract claim regarding a contract between BioProtein and LFB. LFB is the principal defendant, but we were joined in the lawsuit based on the allegations by BioProtein that we tortiously interfered with an existing contract between LFB and BioProtein. The total claim against both parties is for 31 million euros. We have retained counsel in France, and we will vigorously defend ourselves. However, pursuant to our Joint Commercialization and Development Agreement with LFB, LFB has agreed to fully indemnify us with respect to any legal fees and damages arising from this lawsuit. On October 14, 2010, we were informed that the Paris civil court has rejected BioProtein’s initial disclosure request with respect to a contract appending between us and LFB. In that case, BioProtein has been ordered to pay € 2,000 to us and € 5,000 to LFB in order to reimburse a portion of the expenses associated with this procedure. The next hearings on this case are expected to take place late in 2010.

We are not party to any other material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Business Overview

We are the leader in the development and production of human therapeutic proteins through transgenic technology that enables animals to produce what is known as a “recombinant” form of a specific human protein in their milk. Using the unique characteristics of this production technology, we are developing two portfolios of therapeutic proteins:

•

Recombinant plasma proteins. Our portfolio of recombinant plasma proteins is being developed to treat a range of genetic and acquired blood deficiencies, including hemophilia and other blood coagulation disorders. Historically these blood proteins, also known as plasma proteins, have only been available by extraction from human blood. Recombinant versions of plasma proteins are difficult to produce in an economically viable manner using other manufacturing systems.

•

Monoclonal antibodies as follow-on biologics. Our portfolio of monoclonal antibodies, or MAbs, is being developed for use as potential follow-on biologic therapeutics targeted at several large markets in oncology and autoimmune diseases. We believe that our technology may be particularly suited for the creation of bio-betters, or improved versions of many marketed biologic therapeutics.

We also continue to provide production services for external partners, which can provide us a continuing source of cash and revenue.

Our production technology has been validated by the regulatory approval of our first product ATryn^®, which is a recombinant form of the human plasma protein antithrombin, by the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, in 2006 and by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in February 2009. ATryn^® was the first transgenically produced therapeutic protein to be approved anywhere in the world. In connection with the approval of ATryn^®, the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine also approved our New Animal Drug Application, the first of its kind to regulate genetically engineered animals. We believe that these regulatory approvals of our transgenic technology are important benchmarks for obtaining future approvals for our portfolio of products in development.

The key characteristics of our transgenic production technology include:

•

the manufacture of proteins that are difficult to express in other manufacturing systems;

•

the production of proteins in large quantities;

•

the production of proteins with significantly lower capital cost and lower cost of goods;

•

predictable and flexible scale-up;

•

naturally enhanced efficacy for oncology MAbs (increased Antibody Dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity, or ADCC);

•

strong intellectual property position and freedom to operate; and

•

an established commercial scale infrastructure capable of supporting the production of our recombinant plasma protein and MAb products.

We plan to develop our portfolio of recombinant protein products through strategic collaborations. In September 2006, we entered into a collaboration agreement with LFB Biotechnologies, S.A.S, or LFB, to develop selected recombinant plasma proteins and MAbs. The first program in this collaboration is for the development of a recombinant form of human blood coagulation factor VIIa for the treatment of patients with hemophilia. This collaboration is established in a separate joint venture entity, and we have added other programs to this joint venture, including a recombinant form of a human protein involved in blood coagulation, which we in-licensed from ProGenetics LLC, and a recombinant human alpha-1 antitrypsin, as well as an antibody to the CD20 immune system receptor, the same target as for the MAb marketed as Rituxan^® or MabThera^®.

We are also seeking collaborations for the further development and commercialization of ATryn^® and all of our proteins in development including those in the portfolio with LFB, as well as recombinant alpha-fetoprotein, or AFP, for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis and our portfolio of MAbs. We acquired exclusive worldwide rights to AFP in 2009.

We are subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry, including, but not limited to, the uncertainties of clinical trials and regulatory requirements for approval of therapeutic compounds, the risks of development of new biological products, the need for additional capital and collaboration partners, competitive new technologies, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, and compliance with the FDA and other United States and foreign government regulations.

Our consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that we are a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of business, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. We have operated at a net loss since our inception in 1993, excluding the three months ended September 30, 2010, and we used $14.8 million of net cash in our operating cash flows during the first nine months of 2010. We also have negative working capital of $7.8 million as of September 30, 2010. We are entirely dependent upon funding from equity financings, partnering

~~Our consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that we are a going concern, which~~ contemplates the continuity of business, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. We have operated at a net loss since our inception in 1993, and we used $11.5 million of net cash in our operating cash flows during the first six months of 2010. We also have negative working capital of $13.6 million as of July 4, 2010. We are entirely dependent upon funding from equity financings, partnering programs and proceeds from short and long-term debt to finance our operations until we achieve commercial success in selling and licensing our products and positive cash flow from operations. Based on our cash balance as of ~~July~~September 430, 2010, as well as potential cash receipts primarily from ~~existing programs and~~ the ~~$3.7~~funding ~~million~~ of ~~cash~~programs ~~received,~~under ~~net of expenses, from~~ the ~~award~~LFB ~~in the LEO arbitration in July 2010~~collaboration, we believe our capital resources will be sufficient to fund operations to the middle of December ~~the fourth quarter~~ of 2010. Our recurring losses from operations and our limited available funds raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our plans with regard to this matter include seeking additional financing arrangements and seeking collaboration arrangements. If no funds are available, we would have to sell or liquidate the business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the amount of reclassification of liabilities, or any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Management expects that future sources of funding may include new or expanded partnering arrangements, contract service agreements, and additional sales of equity or debt securities. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies. We may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our research and development programs, or obtain funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain product candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently. Additionally, any future equity funding would dilute ownership of our existing equity investors. On November 5, 2009, we implemented a restructuring plan to enable us to meet the requirements of key programs and maximize the impact of our cash resources. In June 2010, we implemented a further restructuring of our operations as part of an initiative to narrow our strategic and operational focus and significantly decrease our on-going financial resource requirements. These restructuring plans, which are expected to provide savings of approximately $13 million to $15 million on an annualized basis, included a cumulative reduction in our work force from 154 to 61 employees.

On November 5, 2009, we implemented a restructuring plan to enable us to meet the requirements of key programs and maximize the impact of our cash resources. In June 2010, we implemented a further restructuring of our operations as part of an initiative to narrow our strategic and operational focus and significantly decrease our on-going financial resource requirements. These restructuring plans, which are expected to provide savings of approximately $13 million to $15 million on an annualized basis, included a cumulative reduction in our work force from 154 to 61 employees.

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition should be read in connection with our consolidated financial statements herein and the accompanying notes thereto, and, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010 (our 2009 Form 10-K), in particular, the information set forth therein under Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

Results of Operations

The key drivers of our losses are costs of revenue and research and development expenses in relation to revenue. As discussed above we implemented ~~two~~ restructuring programs ~~recently~~in November 2009 and June 2010. Under these restructuring plans, headcount was reduced by approximately 60% in aggregate, from 154 to 61 full time equivalent employees. The restructurings included employees from most departments located at both our Framingham and central Massachusetts locations. During the second quarter of 2010 we recorded severance expense in the amount of approximately $2.2 million, of which approximately $800,000 and $1.4 million were recorded to research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively. During the third quarter of 2010, we recorded additional severance expense in the amount of approximately $163,000 for one additional employee headcount reduction. During the first ~~six~~nine months and the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010, approximately $~~277~~955,000 and $~~168~~659,000, respectively, was paid out of the severance reserve related to the 2009 and 2010 restructurings. There are no further amounts owed for the 2009 restructuring. Approximately $21.5 million remains in accrued liabilities in relation to unpaid severance costs for the June 2010 restructuring, which will be paid out through the third quarter of 2011. The changes from both the 2009 and 2010 restructurings, along with other operating expense reductions are expected to provide savings of $13 million to $15 million on an annualized basis. Based on the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 and our projections for the remainder of 2010, we believe we are on track to achieve these savings. ~~Through the end of the second quarter of 2010, we have reduced the run rate of expenses by approximately 50% of these expected reductions on an annual basis, which is in line with our plans.~~

Fiscal three months ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009

	(dollars in thousands)
	July 4,2010		June 28,2009		$ Change			% Change
Revenue	$	4,925	$	655	$	4,270		651	%
Cost of revenue	$	551	$	370	$	181		48	%
Research and development expense	$	5,150	$	6,805	$	(1,655	)	(24	)%
Selling, general & administrative expense	$	2,750	$	3,136	$	(386	)	(12	)%

~~Revenue.~~Fiscal ~~During~~three ~~the second quarter of 2010, as a result of the final award in the~~months ~~LEO~~ended ~~arbitration confirming termination of our agreement with LEO~~September 30, we2010 recognized approximately $4.4 million of revenue relating to upfront milestone payments which had previously been deferred. We also derived approximately $217,000 from Lundbeck, of which approximately $78,000 related to the sale of ATryn® product and ~~approximately $117~~September 27,~~000~~ ~~related to the amortization of milestone payments previously received. During the second quarter of~~ 2009 our revenue was primarily derived from our external development program with PharmAthene. We expect revenue from external programs to continue to vary from quarter to quarter due to the nature, timing and specific requirements for these development activities. In July 2010 we regained the U.S. commercialization rights to ATryn® and, therefore, we will begin to sell directly to end users, which we expect will generate increased revenue in the future resulting from our ability to sell ATryn® at market price which is significantly higher than the transfer price at which we had been selling to Lundbeck. We expect revenue from sales of ATryn® will vary from quarter to quarter.

Cost of revenue. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily a result of an increase of approximately $107,000 on the PharmAthene program related to contract service activities. The level of expenses for our external programs will fluctuate from period to period depending upon the stage of development of individual programs as they progress.


	(dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2010			September 27, 2009			$ Change			% Change
Revenue	$	9,227		$	749		$	8,478			1,132	%
Cost of revenue	$	334		$	554		$	(220	)		(40	)%
Research and development expense	$	3,344		$	7,141		$	(3,797	)		(53	)%
Selling, general & administrative expense	$	1,442		$	2,600		$	(1,158	)		(45	)%
Other income (expense)	$	(585	)	$	4,636		$	(5,221	)		(113	)%
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock	$	—		$	(144	)	$	144			100	%

~~Research and development expense~~Revenue. ~~The~~During ~~decrease~~the inthird ~~research~~quarter ~~and~~of ~~development~~2010, ~~expense~~as ~~was~~a ~~primarily~~result ~~due~~of tothe atermination ~~decrease~~ of ~~ATryn®~~our ~~related~~agreement ~~expenses~~with ofLundbeck, we recognized approximately $1.8.4 million asof ~~well~~revenue asrelating ~~funding~~to ~~from~~upfront ~~LFB~~milestone ofpayments which had previously been deferred. We also derived approximately $~~890~~503,000 inrelated to the ~~second quarter~~sale of ~~2010~~ATryn® product and approximately $212,000 ~~which~~for ~~were~~our ~~partially~~program ~~offset~~with byPharmAthene. anWe ~~increase~~expect ofrevenue $1from external programs to continue to vary from quarter to quarter due to the nature, timing and specific requirements for these development activities.7 ~~million~~In inJuly 2010 we regained the ~~costs~~U.S. ~~incurred~~commercialization onrights to ATryn® and, therefore, we are selling ATryn® directly to end users at market price rather than to Lundbeck at the ~~programs~~lower negotiated price in our previous ~~joint~~agreement ~~collaboration~~ with ~~LFB~~Lundbeck.

~~Our~~Cost ~~second~~of ~~quarter~~revenue. ~~2010~~The ~~research~~decrease ~~and~~in ~~development~~cost ~~expense~~of ~~included~~revenue ~~$1.4~~for ~~million~~the ~~related~~third quarter of 2010 compared to the ~~ATryn®~~ ~~program~~third asquarter ~~compared~~of to2009 ~~$3.2~~was ~~million~~primarily ina ~~the~~result ~~second~~of ~~quarter~~a decrease of ~~2009.~~approximately ~~Details~~$278,000 in costs related to the sale of ATryn®. ~~related~~The level of expenses for our external programs will fluctuate from period to period depending upon the ~~respective~~stage ~~quarters~~of ~~are~~development of individual programs as ~~follows:~~they progress.

	(dollars in millions)Fiscal three months ended
	July 4,2010		June 28,2009
ATryn® manufacturing expenses	$	1.1	$	2.1
EMA regulatory process expenses		—		0.3
U.S. clinical trial and regulatory expenses		0.3		0.8
Total	$	1.4	$	3.2

Research and development expense. The decrease in research and development expense for the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to funding from LFB of $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2010 for costs incurred on the programs in our joint collaboration with LFB, a decrease of follow-on biologics-related expenses of approximately $1.4 million as well as a decrease of ATryn^® related expenses of approximately $900,000.

~~Manufacturing~~Our ~~costs include~~third ~~costs~~quarter of2010 ~~producing~~research ~~commercial~~and ~~material~~development inexpense ~~excess~~included of$1.1 million related to the ~~maximum~~ATryn® ~~transfer~~program ~~price~~as compared to ~~Lundbeck,~~$2 ~~process~~million ~~development~~in ~~and~~the ~~validation~~third ~~costs~~quarter ~~for~~of ~~the~~2009. ~~scale~~Details up of ~~the~~ ATryn® ~~manufacturing~~related ~~process,~~expenses ~~and~~for ~~costs associated with~~ the ~~establishment~~respective ofquarters aare ~~second fill site,~~ as ~~well~~follows: ~~as the accrual of manufacturing costs.~~

During the second quarter of 2010 we incurred approximately $3.2 million of expenses for our joint collaboration programs with LFB (FVIIa, FIX, CD20 and AAT) and we also recorded a $890,000 receivable from LFB related to an agreed upon reimbursable portion of our costs incurred in these programs during the second quarter of 2010, which was reflected as a reduction in the program costs in research and development. During the second quarter of 2009, we incurred approximately $1.5 million of expense in support of the programs in our LFB collaboration (FVIIa, FIX, CD20 and AAT).


	(dollars in millions) Fiscal three months ended
	September 30, 2010		September 27, 2009
ATryn^® manufacturing expenses	$	0.5	$	1.4
EMA regulatory process expenses		0.2		0.3
U.S. clinical trial and regulatory expenses		0.4		0.3

Total	$	1.1	$	2.0

WeManufacturing ~~also~~costs ~~incurred~~include ~~approximately~~the ~~$1.4~~costs ~~million~~ of ~~expenses~~producing oncommercial ~~other~~material ~~research~~in ~~and~~excess ~~development~~of ~~programs,~~the ~~including~~maximum ~~approximately~~transfer ~~$653,000~~price ~~for~~to ~~follow-on biologics~~Lundbeck, ~~most~~process ofdevelopment ~~which~~and ~~were~~validation ~~internal~~ costs, ~~during~~for the ~~second~~scale ~~quarter~~up of ~~2010~~the asATryn® ~~compared~~manufacturing toprocess, ~~$2.1~~and costs ~~million~~associated inwith the ~~second~~establishment ~~quarter~~ of ~~2009.~~a ~~This~~second ~~decrease~~fill issite, ~~primarily~~as ~~due~~well toas ~~lower expenses incurred on~~ the ~~follow-on~~accrual ~~biologics~~of ~~programs.~~manufacturing ~~We cannot estimate the~~ costs ~~to complete our ongoing research and development programs due to significant variability in clinical trial costs and the regulatory approval process~~.

~~Selling~~During the third quarter of 2010, ~~general~~we ~~and~~incurred ~~administrative~~approximately ~~expense~~$2.7 ~~The~~million ~~decrease~~of inexpenses ~~SG&A~~for isour ~~primarily~~joint acollaboration ~~result~~programs ofwith ~~lower~~LFB ~~expenses~~(FVIIa, ofFIX, ~~approximately~~CD20 and AAT) and we also recorded a $~~665,000~~1.4 million receivable from LFB related to ~~the~~ ~~LEO~~an ~~arbitration,~~agreed aupon ~~decrease~~reimbursable portion of our ~~approximately~~costs ~~$77,000~~incurred in ~~other~~these ~~legal~~programs ~~costs~~during asthe ~~well~~third quarter of 2010, which was reflected as a ~~decrease~~reduction ofin ~~approximately~~the ~~$132,000~~program costs in ~~costs~~research ~~associated~~and ~~with~~development. ~~being~~During anthe ~~SEC~~third ~~reporting~~quarter ~~company~~of ~~partially~~2009, ~~offset~~we byincurred ~~severance~~approximately ~~related~~$2.3 ~~costs~~million of ~~approximately~~expense in ~~$553~~support of the programs in our LFB collaboration (FVIIa,~~000~~ FIX, CD20 and AAT).

~~Fiscal~~We ~~six~~also ~~months~~incurred ~~ended~~approximately ~~July 4,~~$1 ~~2020~~million of expenses on other research and ~~June 28,~~development programs during the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2009. This decrease is primarily due to lower expenses incurred on the AFP and follow-on biologics programs. We cannot estimate the costs to complete our ongoing research and development programs due to significant variability in clinical trial costs and the regulatory approval process.

	(dollars in thousands)
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009		$ Change			% Change
Revenue	$	5,271	$	853	$	4,418		517	%
Cost of revenue	$	579	$	636	$	(57	)	(8	)%
Research and development expense	$	9,918	$	13,773	$	(3,855	)	(28	)%
Selling, general & administrative expense	$	5,533	$	5,645	$	(112	)	(1	)%

Selling, general and administrative expense. The decrease in SG&A is primarily a result of lower expenses of approximately $621,000 related to the LEO arbitration, a decrease of approximately $116,000 in other legal costs as well as a decrease of approximately $271,000 in costs associated with the 2010 restructurings.

~~Revenue.~~Other ~~During 2010, as a result of the final award in the LEO arbitration, we~~income ~~recognized approximately $4~~(expense).4 ~~million~~Other ofincome ~~revenue~~in ~~relating to~~ the ~~upfront~~third ~~milestone~~quarter ~~payments which had previously been deferred. Also during the first six months~~ of 2010 we derived approximately $397,000 from Lundbeck, of which approximately $131,000 related to the sale of ATryn® product and approximately $234,000 related to the amortization of milestone payments previously received, as well as approximately $212,000 for our PharmAthene program. During the first six months of 2009, ~~our revenue~~ was primarily ~~derived from our external development program with PharmAthene. We expect revenue from external programs to continue to vary from quarter to quarter~~ due to ~~the~~non-cash ~~nature,~~other ~~timing~~income ~~and~~as ~~specific~~a ~~requirements~~result ~~for~~of ~~these development activities. In July 2010 we regained~~ the ~~U.S.~~change ~~commercialization rights to ATryn® and, therefore, we will begin to sell directly to end users, which we expect will generate increased revenue~~ in the ~~future~~fair ~~resulting~~value ~~from~~of ~~our~~the ~~ability~~derivative toand ~~sell~~warrants ~~ATryn®~~associated atwith ~~market price which is significantly higher than~~ the ~~transfer~~July ~~price~~2009 atLFB ~~which~~redeemable weconvertible ~~had~~preferred ~~been selling to Lundbeck. We expect revenue from sales of ATryn® will~~stock ~~vary from quarter to quarter~~financing.

~~Cost~~Accretion ofon ~~revenue.~~redeemable ~~The~~convertible ~~decrease~~preferred instock. ~~cost~~During ofthe ~~revenue~~third ~~was~~quarter ~~primarily a result~~ of a2009 ~~reversal~~we ofrecorded ~~accrued royalties in 2010 of approximately~~ $~~118~~144,000 of accretion associated with ~~a technology agreement no longer in use partially offset by an increase of approximately $39,000 on~~ the ~~PharmAthene~~July ~~program~~2009 ~~related~~LFB toredeemable ~~contract~~convertible ~~service~~preferred ~~activities.~~stock ~~The level of expenses for our external programs will fluctuate from period to period depending upon the stage of development of individual programs as they progress~~financing.

~~Research~~Fiscal ~~and~~nine development expense. The decrease in research and development expense was primarily due to a decrease of ATryn® related expenses of approximately $3.4 million as well as funding from LFB of approximately $2.8 million in the first six months ~~of 2010~~ended September 30, ~~partially~~2020 ~~offset by an increase of $3.9 million in the costs incurred on the programs in our joint collaboration with LFB. Also included in research~~ and ~~development expense in the first the six months of 2010 is a reversal of approximately $270~~September 27,~~000~~ of2009 ~~accrued royalties and license fees related to the technology agreement mentioned above.~~

The research and development expense for the first six months of 2010 included $3.4 million related to the ATryn® program, a decrease of $3.4 million as compared to $6.8 million in the first six months of 2009. Details of ATryn® related expenses for the respective quarters are as follows:


	(dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2010		September 27, 2009			$ Change			% Change
Revenue	$	14,498	$	1,602		$	12,896			805	%
Cost of revenue	$	913	$	1,190		$	(277	)		(23	)%
Research and development expense	$	13,262	$	20,914		$	(7,652	)		(37	)%
Selling, general and administrative expense	$	6,975	$	8,245		$	(1,270	)		(15	)%
Other income (expense)	$	2,115	$	2,726		$	(611	)		(22	)%
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock	$	—	$	(144	)	$	144			100	%

	(dollars in millions)
	Fiscal six months ended
	July 4,2010		June 28,2009
ATryn® manufacturing expenses	$	2.8	$	4.3
EMA regulatory process expenses		0.2		0.5
U.S. clinical trial and regulatory expenses		0.4		2.0
Total	$	3.4	$	6.8

Revenue. During the first nine months of 2010, as a result of the final award in the LEO Pharma arbitration, we recognized approximately $4.4 million of revenue relating to the upfront milestone payments which had previously been deferred. Also during the first nine months of 2010, as a result of the termination of our agreement with Lundbeck, we recognized approximately $8.6 million of revenue relating to upfront milestone payments which had previously been deferred, approximately $633,000 related to the sale of ATryn^® product as well as approximately $424,000 for our PharmAthene program. During the first nine months of 2009, our revenue was primarily derived from Lundbeck, of which approximately $477,000 related to the sale of ATryn^® product and approximately $243,000 related to the amortization of milestone payments previously received. We also derived approximately $377,000 of revenue from our external development program with PharmAthene during the first nine months of 2009. We expect revenue from external programs to continue to vary from quarter to quarter due to the nature, timing and specific requirements for these development activities. In July 2010 we regained the U.S. commercialization rights to ATryn^® and, therefore, we are selling ATryn^® directly to end users at market price rather than to Lundbeck at the lower negotiated price in our previous agreement with Lundbeck.

~~Manufacturing~~Cost ~~costs include costs~~ of ~~producing~~revenue. ~~commercial~~The ~~material~~decrease in ~~excess~~cost of ~~the~~revenue ~~maximum transfer price to Lundbeck, process development and validation costs~~ for the ~~scale up of the~~first ~~ATryn®~~nine ~~manufacturing~~months ~~process, costs associated with the establishment~~ of a2010 ~~second~~compared ~~fill~~to ~~site, as well as~~ the ~~accrual~~ ~~of manufacturing costs. During the~~ first ~~six~~nine months of ~~2010,~~2009 wewas ~~incurred~~primarily ~~approximately~~a ~~$6.7~~result ~~million~~ of ~~expense~~a ondecrease ~~our~~in ~~joint~~costs ~~collaboration~~of ~~programs~~approximately ~~with LFB (FVIIa~~$241,000 ~~FIX, CD20 and AAT), and we also recorded $2.8 million of funding from LFB~~ related to anthe ~~agreed~~sale ~~upon reimbursable portion~~ of ~~our~~ATryn®. ~~costs~~The ~~incurred~~level ~~in these programs during the first quarter~~ of ~~2010,~~expenses ~~which~~for ~~was~~our ~~reflected~~external asprograms awill ~~reduction~~fluctuate infrom ~~the~~period ~~program~~to ~~costs~~period independing ~~research~~upon ~~and development of which $1.9 million was subsequently received in~~ the ~~second~~stage ~~quarter. During the first six months~~ of ~~2009,~~development ~~we incurred approximately $2.7 million~~ of ~~expense~~individual ~~in support of the~~ programs inas ~~our~~they ~~LFB collaboration (FVIIa, FIX, CD20 and AAT) for which we did not receive reimbursement from LFB~~progress.

WeResearch ~~also~~and ~~incurred~~development ~~approximately $2~~expense.7 ~~million~~The ofdecrease ~~expense~~in ~~on other~~ research and development ~~programs,~~expense ~~including~~for ~~follow-on~~the ~~biologics of~~first ~~approximately~~nine ~~$1.4~~months ~~million, most~~ of ~~which~~2010 ~~were~~compared ~~internal~~to ~~costs, during~~ the first ~~six~~nine months of ~~2010~~2009 aswas ~~compared~~primarily due to a decrease of ATryn® related expenses of approximately $4.25 million inas ~~the~~well ~~first~~as ~~six~~funding ~~months~~from LFB of ~~2009~~approximately $4.4 Wemillion ~~cannot~~in ~~estimate~~ the ~~costs~~first tonine ~~complete~~months ~~our~~of ~~ongoing~~2010, ~~research~~partially ~~and~~offset ~~development~~by ~~programs due~~an toincrease ~~significant~~of ~~variability~~approximately $342,000 in ~~clinical~~the ~~trial~~ costs ~~and~~incurred on the ~~regulatory~~programs ~~approval~~in ~~process~~our joint collaboration with LFB.

~~Selling,~~The ~~general~~research and ~~administrative~~development expense~~. The~~ ~~decrease~~for inthe ~~SG&A~~first isnine ~~primarily~~months ~~a result~~ of ~~lower~~2010 ~~expenses of approximately~~ included $~~861,000~~4.5 million related to the ~~LEO~~ATryn® ~~arbitration~~program, ~~as well as~~ a decrease of ~~approximately~~ $~~227,000~~4.5 inmillion ~~costs~~as ~~associated~~compared ~~with~~to ~~being~~$9 anmillion ~~SEC~~in ~~reporting~~the ~~company partially offset by~~first annine ~~increase~~months of ~~approximately~~2009. ~~$733,000~~Details inof ~~consulting~~ATryn® ~~costs~~ related toexpenses ~~our~~for ~~financing~~the ~~and~~respective ~~partnering~~quarters ~~efforts~~are as ~~well~~follows: ~~as severance related costs of approximately $352,000.~~


	(dollars in millions) Fiscal nine months ended
	September 30, 2010		September 27, 2009
ATryn^® manufacturing expenses	$	3.3	$	5.8
EMA regulatory process expenses		0.4		0.8
U.S. clinical trial and regulatory expenses		0.8		2.4

Total	$	4.5	$	9.0

Manufacturing costs include the costs of producing commercial material in excess of the maximum transfer price to Lundbeck, process development and validation costs for the scale up of the ATryn^® manufacturing process, costs associated with the establishment of a second fill site, as well as the accrual of manufacturing costs.

During the first nine months of 2010, we incurred approximately $9.4 million of expense on our joint collaboration programs with LFB (FVIIa, FIX, CD20 and AAT), and we also recorded $4.4 million of funding from LFB related to an agreed upon reimbursable portion of our costs incurred in these programs during the first nine months of 2010, which was reflected as a reduction in the program costs in research and development. During the first nine months of 2009, we incurred approximately $4.7 million of expense in support of the programs in our LFB collaboration (FVIIa, FIX, CD20 and AAT) for which we did not receive reimbursement from LFB.

We also incurred approximately $3.7 million of expenses on other research and development programs during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $7.2 million in the first nine months of 2009. This decrease is primarily due to lower expenses incurred on the AFP and follow-on biologics programs. We cannot estimate the costs to complete our ongoing research and development programs due to significant variability in clinical trial costs and the regulatory approval process.

Selling, general and administrative expense. The decrease in SG&A from the first nine months of2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009 is primarily a result of lower expenses of approximately $1.5 million related to the LEO Pharma arbitration as well as a decrease of approximately $543,000 in costs associated with being an SEC reporting company, which were partially offset by an increase of approximately $653,000 in consulting costs related to our financing and partnering efforts.

Other income. Other income in the first nine months of 2010 is primarily due to the $3.8 million gain as a result of the determination by the ICC that we validly terminated our collaboration agreement with LEO Pharma. Other income in the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to non-cash other income as a result of the change in the fair value of the derivative and warrants associated with the July 2009 LFB redeemable convertible preferred stock financing.

Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred stock. During the first nine months of 2009 we recorded $144,000 of accretion associated with the July 2009 LFB redeemable convertible preferred stock financing.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our objective is to finance our business appropriately through a mix of debt or equity financings, partnering payments, receipts from contracts for external programs, grant proceeds and interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents, until such time as we have sufficient product sales and royalties to achieve positive cash flow from operations. We expect that our ability to raise future funds will be affected by our ability to enter into some combination of new or expanded partnering arrangements and service contracts for external programs, the terms of such arrangements and contracts, the results of research and development and preclinical and clinical testing of FVIIa and our other proprietary product candidates, and advances in competing products and technologies, as well as general market conditions.

We use our cash primarily to pay salaries, wages and benefits, facility and facility-related costs of office, farm and laboratory space and other outside direct costs such as manufacturing and clinical trial expenses. During the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 we had a net ~~increase~~decrease in cash and marketable securities of $21.41 million, which reflects $1114.58 million used in operations, $320,000 for purchases of property, plant and equipment and $8893,000 used to pay down debt, net of $14 million of funding from LFB related to our issuance to LFB of two secured notes.

Our consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that we are a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of business, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. We have incurred losses from operations and negative operating cash flow in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010 and since inception, and we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $~~337~~333 million at ~~July~~September 430, 2010. The primary sources of additional capital raised in 2009 and the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 have been equity financings and debt financings. Based on our cash balance as of ~~July~~September 430, 2010, as well as the potential cash receipts primarily from ~~existing programs and~~ the ~~$3.7~~funding ~~million~~ of ~~cash~~programs ~~received,~~under ~~net of expenses, from~~ the ~~award~~LFB ~~in the LEO arbitration in July 2010~~collaboration, we anticipate that we have the ability to continue our operations to the middle of ~~the~~December ~~fourth quarter~~ of 2010. We are currently engaged in discussions for potential new partnering arrangements and plan to bring in further financial resources through some combination of partnering transactions, including milestones, contract services, and other debt or equity financings. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into anticipated partnering arrangements, or raise additional capital, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If no funds are available we would have to sell or liquidate the business. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our research and development programs, reduce our planned commercialization efforts, or obtain funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain product candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently. Additionally, any future equity funding would dilute the ownership percentage of our existing equity investors. On November 5, 2009, we implemented a restructuring plan to enable us to meet the requirements of key programs and maximize the impact of our cash resources. In June 2010, we implemented a further restructuring of our operations as part of an initiative to narrow our strategic and operational focus and significantly decrease our on-going financial resource requirements. These two restructuring plans, which are expected to provide savings of approximately $13 million to $15 million on an annualized basis, included a cumulative reduction in our work force from 154 to 61 employees.

minority shareholders for $0.28 per share. Once this transaction is completed we would no longer be required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Please refer to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2010, for further information regarding this offer.

On November 5, 2009, we implemented a restructuring plan to enable us to meet the requirements of key programs and maximize the impact of our cash resources. In June 2010, we implemented a further restructuring of our operations as part of an initiative to narrow our strategic and operational focus and significantly decrease our on-going financial resource requirements. These two restructuring plans, which are expected to provide savings of approximately $13 million to $15 million on an annualized basis, included a cumulative reduction in our work force from 154 to 61 employees.

Cash Flows used in Operating Activities

Cash used in operating activities ~~increased~~decreased by approximately $15.34 million from $1020.2 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 to $1114.58 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily a result of ~~an increase in accounts payable partially offset by~~ $24.84 million of cost reimbursement from LFB in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 ~~included in our net loss~~.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

There were no significant cash flows provided by or used in investing activities during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 and 2009.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

In February 2010 we issued a secured note to LFB in the principal amount of $7,000,000, the principal and accrued interest of which may be cancelled at LFB’s option and credited to the purchase of shares of our common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock through participation, at LFB’s option, in future offerings of our securities at the price per share of the respective offering.

In June 2010, we issued a secured convertible note to LFB in the principal amount of $7,000,000. LFB may convert the debt into our common stock at any time at a conversion price of $0.42 per share. Prior to a conversion, the principal and accrued interest may be cancelled at LFB’s option and credited to the purchase of shares of our common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock through participation, at LFB’s option, in future offerings or our securities at the price per share of the respective offering.

19Our $31.7 million of outstanding long-term debt at September, 2010 includes approximately $13.5 million owed to LFB (net of unamortized discount of approximately $248,000) on the convertible note that we issued to LFB in December 2008, approximately $753,000 owed to LFB (net of an unamortized discount of approximately $89,000) on the convertible note that we issued to LFB in December 2006, approximately $3.4 million owed to LFB on the term debt promissory note that we issued in June 2009, approximately $7 million on the term debt promissory note that was issued in February 2010 and approximately $7 million on the convertible note that was issued in June 2010. Of the $31.7 million, approximately $26,000 was classified as current, which reflects the amount due through September 2011 on the capital leases.

Our $31.5 million of outstanding long-term debt at July 4, 2010 includes approximately $13.3 million owed to LFB (net of unamortized discount of approximately $284,000) on the convertible note that we issued to LFB in December 2008, approximately $735,000 owed to LFB (net of an unamortized discount of approximately $108,000) on the convertible note that we issued to LFB in December 2006, approximately $3.4 million owed to LFB on the term debt promissory note that we issued in June 2009, approximately $7 million on the term debt promissory note that was issued in February 2010 and approximately $7 million on the convertible note that was issued in June 2010. Of the $31.5 million, approximately $327,000 was classified as current, which reflects the amount due through June 2011 on the convertible notes and the term debt promissory notes with LFB as well as the amounts due for capital leases.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Our commitments and contingencies are disclosed in Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of our ~~2009~~Annual Report on Form 10-K. for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010. We have reviewed the commitments and contingencies at ~~July~~September 430, 2010 and noted that there were no material changes or additions.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes in our market risk since January 3, 2010. Our market risk disclosures are discussed in our ~~2009~~Annual Report on Form 10-K ~~under~~for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010 under the heading Item 7A — “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation of our internal control that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

2021

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

In connection with our collaboration with LEO Pharma, we initiated International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration proceedings in the fourth quarter of 2008 and asked the tribunal to determine that LEO was not legally entitled to exercise its contractual remedies on termination for alleged cause and that we were entitled to damages with respect to LEO’s actions. In July 2010, the tribunal in the ICC proceedings issued its final, non-appealable award, finding that we had validly terminated our collaboration agreement with LEO Pharma in March 2009 and awarding us a total of approximately $4.1 million in damages and costs, which were paid by LEO in July 2010. In addition, LEO has ~~been~~turned ~~ordered to turn~~ over to us all data related to the Phase II trial that LEO was conducting in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and that was terminated before the planned completion of the trial. All of LEO Pharma’s counterclaims in the arbitration were rejected.

We are not party to any other material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.

2122

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

Exhibit		Description
3.1.1		Restated Articles of Organization of the Company filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 8, 2009. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2009 (File No. 0-21794) and incorporated herein by reference.
3.1.2		Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of the Company filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 26, 2009. Filed at Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on May 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.1.3		Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc., filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on July 30, 2009. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on July 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2		By-Laws of the Company, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 1999 (File No. 0-21794) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1		$7,000,000 convertible secured note issued by the Company to LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. on June 15, 2010. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on June 18, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.1**		GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. amended and restated 2002 Equity Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on June 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2		Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Security Agreement between the Company and LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. Filed herewith.
10.3		Fourth Amendment to Mortgage Agreement and Fixture Filing between the Company and LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. Filed herewith.
10.4**		Separation Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2010, by and between the Company and Geoffrey F. Cox. Filed herewith.
10.5**		Separation Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2010, by and between the Company and John B. Green. Filed herewith.
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2		Certification of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
32		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

EXHIBIT INDEX

** Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.


Exhibit		Description

3.1.1		Restated Articles of Organization of the Company filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 8, 2009. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2009 (File No. 0-21794) and incorporated herein by reference.

3.1.2		Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of the Company filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 26, 2009. Filed at Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on May 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.1.3		Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc., filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on July 30, 2009. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on July 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2		By-Laws of the Company, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 1999 (File No. 0-21794) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.1		Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2010, by and between the Company and NDNE 9/90 Corporate Center, LLC. Filed herewith.

10.2		Services and Access Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2010, by and between the Company and PP Manufacturing Corporation. Filed herewith.

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

32		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

2223

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: July 28, 2010	GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
Date: October 27, 2010	GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
	By:	/S/ WILLIAM K. HEIDEN
		William K. Heiden
		Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President
		Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive Officer

2324

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Description
3.1.1		Restated Articles of Organization of the Company filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 8, 2009. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2009 (File No. 0-21794) and incorporated herein by reference.
3.1.2		Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of the Company filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 26, 2009. Filed at Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on May 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.1.3		Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Organization of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc., filed with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on July 30, 2009. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on July 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2		By-Laws of the Company, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 1999 (File No. 0-21794) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1		$7,000,000 convertible secured note issued by the Company to LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. on June 15, 2010. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on June 18, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.1		Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2010, by and between the Company and NDNE 9/90 Corporate Center, LLC. Filed herewith.
10.1**		GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. amended and restated 2002 Equity Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-21794) on June 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2		Services and Access Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2010, by and between the Company and PP Manufacturing Corporation. Filed herewith.
10.2		Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Security Agreement between the Company and LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. Filed herewith.
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
10.3		Fourth Amendment to Mortgage Agreement and Fixture Filing between the Company and LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. Filed herewith.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
10.4**		Separation Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2010, by and between the Company and Geoffrey F. Cox. Filed herewith.
10.5**		Separation Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2010, by and between the Company and John B. Green. Filed herewith.
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2		Certification of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
32		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

**25 ~~Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.~~

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · rEVO Biologics, Inc.