UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 333-113658


Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd.		Sensus USA Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)		(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda

98-0413362

Delaware

51-0338883

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

8601 Six Forks Road, Suite 700, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(919) 845-4000

(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~July~~December 2613, 2010, Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. had 12,000 common shares outstanding, all of which were owned by Sensus (Bermuda 1) Ltd., and Sensus USA Inc. had 283.603994 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which were owned by Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd.

Part I—Financial Information

		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009	4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the fiscal quarters and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		4
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Equity (unaudited) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010	5
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Equity (unaudited) for the six months ended September 30, 2010		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		6
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	7	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31	32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37	39
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38	40
	Part II—Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	39	42
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	39	42
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39	42
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	39	42
Item 4.	Reserved	39	42
Item 5.	Other Information	39	42
Item 6.	Exhibits	39	42

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except per share and share data)

	June 30,2010			March 31,2010
	September 30,2010			March 31,2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3140.29		$	59.2
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.3 at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010		115.3			122.4
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.7 and $1.3, respectively		100.6			121.1
Other		1.0.6			1.9
Inventories, net		6670.36			67.02
Prepayments and other current assets		1314.82			12.92
Deferred income taxes		619.61			619.96
Deferred costs		65.15			54.13
Total current assets		~~240~~251.35			~~275~~285.45
Property, plant and equipment, net		~~132~~134.60			~~136~~134.39
Intangible assets, net		184.71			188.0
Goodwill		~~464~~459.42			~~453~~443.83
Deferred income taxes		1615.48			1615.48
Deferred costs		1.7			1.3
Other long-term assets		24.5			25.1
Total assets	$	1,~~062~~070.98		$	1,~~095~~093.09
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	8186.31		$	~~115~~117.53
Accruals and other current liabilities		~~100~~98.59			~~115~~114.78
Current portion of long-term debt		158.7			22.7
Short-term borrowings		2751.30			4.9
Income taxes payable		1.4			0.3
Restructuring accruals		9.7			12.9
Restructuring accruals		8.6			12.9
Deferred revenue		32.4			34.3
Deferred revenue		11.6			11.6
Total current liabilities		286.8			306.9
Total current liabilities		246.4			283.6
Long-term debt, less current portion		437.5			438.3
Long-term debt, less current portion		437.9			438.3
Pensions		54.0			53.1
Pensions		48.6			53.1
Deferred income taxes		81.6			81.7
Deferred income taxes		84.4			84.5
Deferred revenue		9.9			4.8
Deferred revenue		2.3			2.4
Other long-term liabilities		21.1			28.6
Other long-term liabilities		40.8			32.2
Total liabilities		890.9			913.4
Total liabilities		860.4			894.1
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)
STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY:
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share, 12,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding		—			—
Paid-in capital		250.75			251.75
Accumulated deficit		(5276.79	)		(5474.46	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1.0	)		(1.5	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		0.4			(1.5	)
Total stockholder’s equity		~~197~~174.0			~~195~~175.84
Noncontrolling interest		5.59			5.1
Total equity		~~202~~179.59			~~200~~180.95
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,~~062~~070.98		$	1,~~095~~093.09

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2009			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2009
NET SALES	$	~~225~~203.82		$	~~200~~204.30		$	428.0		$	399.4
COST OF SALES		~~162~~145.19			~~145~~150.86			307.5			296.2
GROSS PROFIT		6357.73			5453.54			120.5			103.2
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4244.74			3536.36			86.2			72.0
Restructuring costs		1.09			63.80			2.9			9.8
Amortization of intangible assets		3.34			23.80			6.7			5.8
Other operating expense, net		1.0			0.8
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			5.9			—			5.9
OPERATING INCOME		15.7			8.8
Other operating expense, net		0.7			1.7			1.7			2.5
NON-OPERATING (EXPENSE) INCOME:
OPERATING INCOME		6.9			3.2			23.0			7.2
Interest expense, net		(11.3	)		(9.0	)
NON-OPERATING (EXPENSE) INCOME:
Other income, net		0.3			1.5
Interest expense, net		(11.1	)		(11.7	)		(22.4	)		(20.7	)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		4.7			1.3
Other (expense) income, net		(0.8	)		(0.2	)		(0.5	)		1.3
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		2.5			1.0
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(5.0	)		(8.7	)		0.1			(12.2	)
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME		2.2			0.3
(BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(1.0	)		(2.5	)		1.6			(3.3	)
LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST		(0.5	)		(0.8	)
CONSOLIDATED NET LOSS		(4.0	)		(6.2	)		(1.5	)		(8.9	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST	$	1.7		$	(0.5	)
LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST		(0.3	)		(0.6	)		(0.8	)		(1.4	)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST	$	(4.3	)	$	(6.8	)	$	(2.3	)	$	(10.3	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	CommonStock		~~Paid-inCapital~~	Paid-inCapital			~~AccumulatedDeficit~~	AccumulatedDeficit			~~AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveLoss~~	AccumulatedOtherComprehensive(Loss) Income			~~TotalStockholder’sEquity~~	TotalStockholder’sEquity			~~NoncontrollingInterest~~	NoncontrollingInterest		~~TotalEquity~~	TotalEquity
Balance at March 31, 2010	$	—	$	~~251.7~~$	251.5		$	~~(54.4~~$	)(74.6	)	$	~~(1.5~~$	)(1.5	)	$	~~195.8~~$	175.4		$	~~5.1~~$	5.1	$	~~200.9~~$	180.5
Equity adjustment from parent related to Rongtai acquisition		—		~~(1.0~~	)(1.0	)		—	—			—	—			~~(1.0~~	)(1.0	)		—	—		~~(1.0~~	)(1.0	)
Other comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Net income		—		—				1.7				—				1.7				0.5			2.2
Net (loss) income		—			—				(2.3	)			—				(2.3	)			0.8			(1.5	)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $0.3 million		—		—				—				0.5				0.5				—			0.5
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—				—				1.2				1.2				—			1.2
Total comprehensive income																2.2				0.5			2.7
Defined benefit pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $0.0 million		—			—				—				0.1				0.1				—			0.1
Foreign currency translation adjustment related to noncontrolling interest		—		—				—				—				—				(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax of $0.4 million		—			—				—				0.6				0.6				—			0.6
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	—	$	250.7			$	(52.7	)		$	(1.0	)		$	197.0			$	5.5		$	202.5
Total comprehensive (loss) income																	(0.4	)			0.8			0.4
Balance at September 30, 2010	$	—		$	250.5			$	(76.9	)		$	0.4			$	174.0			$	5.9		$	179.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
	Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Consolidated net income	$	2.2		$	0.3
Consolidated net loss	$	(1.5	)	$	(8.9	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		714.10			612.37
Amortization of intangible assets		36.37			25.8
Amortization of software development costs		12.37			13.73
Amortization of deferred financing costs		01.86			01.75
Net loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions		0.3			(1.0	)
Net loss on sale of fixed assets		0.2			—
Changes in assets and liabilities used in operations:
Non-cash restructuring charges		0.1			—
Trade accounts receivable		4.1			3.0
Net loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions		0.2			(0.5	)
Inventories		(1.1	)		(0.5	)
Deferred income taxes		—			(8.4	)
Other current assets		(1.4	)		1.1
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			5.9
Accounts payable, accruals and other current liabilities		(49.2	)		(11.3	)
Changes in assets and liabilities used in operations, net of effects of acquisitions:
Income taxes payable		1.1			(1.2	)
Trade accounts receivable		22.3			13.0
Deferred revenue less deferred costs primarily from long-term AMI electric and gas contracts		(1.0	)		(2.2	)
Inventories		(2.9	)		3.2
Other		(1.6	)		(1.5	)
Other current assets		(1.8	)		2.6
Net cash used in operating activities		(34.1	)		(1.8	)
Accounts payable, accruals and other current liabilities		(43.8	)		(16.9	)
Income taxes payable		(0.2	)		3.0
Deferred revenue less deferred costs		1.6			2.7
Other		(0.5	)		(0.8	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(1.3	)		18.2
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(612.98	)		(614.54	)
Software development costs		(1.3	)		(2.3	)
Purchases of intangible assets		(2.7	)		(3.9	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(8.2	)		(8.8	)
Software development costs		(2.9	)		(4.4	)
Business acquisitions		(29.6	)		(20.2	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(48.0	)		(42.9	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in short-term borrowings		2246.40			—
Principal payments on debt		(7.4	)		—
Proceeds from debt issuance		—			35.0
Net cash provided by financing activities		15.0			—
Debt issuance costs		—			(8.8	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(0.7	)		0.6
Purchase of noncontrolling equity interest		—			(6.0	)
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(28.0	)		(10.0	)
Principal payments on debt		(14.8	)		(0.4	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		31.2			19.8
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(0.2	)		1.0
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(18.3	)		(3.9	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR	$	59.2		$	37.9
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	3140.29		$	2734.90
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1722.13		$	1218.65
Income taxes, net of refunds	$	12.37		$	24.02

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES (NOTE 2):

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, paid-in capital decreased $1.0 million inand $6.8 million, respectively, in connection with the purchase of the PDC Rongtai noncontrolling interest, representing the excess purchase price over the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest.

During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the 15,000 unvested preference shares issued in connection with the AMDS acquisition became vested with a redemption value of $15 million.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. General

Description of Business

Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. (“Sensus 2”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Sensus (Bermuda 1) Ltd. (“Sensus 1”), together with its subsidiaries, referred to herein as the Company, is a leading provider of advanced metering and related communications solutions to the worldwide utility industry. The Company is a global manufacturer of water, gas, heat and electric meters, as well as a provider of comprehensive metering communications system solutions that include both automatic meter reading (“AMR”) and installation and maintenance of advanced metering infrastructure (“AMI”) systems. In addition, the Company produces pipe joining and repair products for water and natural gas utilities and is a supplier of precision-manufactured aluminum die castings.

The Company was formed on December 18, 2003 through the acquisition of the metering systems and certain other businesses of Invensys plc (“Invensys”). Prior to the acquisition, the Company had no active business operations. The metering systems businesses operated by Invensys prior to the acquisition are referred to herein as “Invensys Metering Systems.”

Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company’s management in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information related to the Company’s organization, significant accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for the fair presentation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been included, and the unaudited consolidated financial statements present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010 and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K /A as filed with the SEC on December 17, 2010.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements present results of the Company for the fiscal quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and ~~June 27,~~ 2009. Effective April 1, 2010, the Company elected to change its quarterly reporting period to be based on the calendar quarter end. Prior to April 1, 2010, the Company operated on a 4 week, 4 week, 5 week financial and business closing schedule for all periods, except year end, which ~~was~~ is March 31, and the fiscal half year, which ~~was~~is September 30. The three-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 includes three ~~more~~fewer days than the 13-week period of the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year as a result of transitioning to the new reporting period. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services are rendered, the sales price or fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Additionally, the Company has certain sales rebate programs with some customers that periodically require rebate payments. The Company estimates amounts due under these sales rebate programs at the point of sale. Net sales reflects estimated future rebate payments and sales returns and allowances. These estimates are based upon the Company’s historical experience. The Company records an allowance for sales returns based on

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

require rebate payments. The Company estimates amounts due under these sales rebate programs at the point of sale. Net sales reflects estimated future rebate payments and sales returns and allowances. These estimates are based upon the Company’s historical experience. The Company records an allowance for sales returns based on the historical relationship between shipments and returns. Revisions to these estimates are recorded in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.

In October 2009, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements, which changes the requirements for establishing separate units of accounting in a multiple element arrangement and requires that the arrangement consideration be allocated to each deliverable based on the relative selling price. Concurrently, the FASB issued guidance modifying the scope of software revenue guidance for arrangements that include software elements to exclude software that is sold with a tangible product from the scope of software revenue guidance if the software is essential to the tangible product’s functionality. The Company elected to early adopt this accounting guidance retrospectively during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Therefore, previously reported results for fiscal 2010 and prior fiscal periods were revised to reflect the impact of adoption. Upon adoption of the new guidance, the Company concluded that substantially all of its products and services are excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance.

The Company elected to early adopt this accounting guidance retrospectively during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Therefore, previously reported results for fiscal 2010 and prior fiscal periods were revised to reflect the impact of adoption. Upon adoption of the new guidance, the Company concluded that substantially all of its products and services are excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. See Note 2 for tables that present the effects of the retrospective application of these changes.

The Company has long-term contracts primarily from AMI electric and gas utility customers for the deployment of AMI technology systems that contain multiple elements including hardware, software, project management and installation services as well as ongoing customer support.

Pursuant to the new revenue recognition guidance, revenue arrangements with multiple elements are divided into separate units of accounting if the delivered item(s) have value to the customer on a standalone basis and delivery/performance of the undelivered item(s) is probable. The Company allocates revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available, third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. In multiple element arrangements revenue is allocated to each separate unit of accounting using the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy and the applicable revenue recognition criteria. For our standard contract arrangements that combine deliverables, such as hardware, software, project management and installation services, each deliverable is generally considered a single unit of accounting. The amount allocable to a delivered item is limited to the amount that we are entitled to collect and that is not contingent upon the delivery/performance of additional items.

~~Deferred~~Hardware ~~Revenue~~revenues are generally recognized at the time of shipment, receipt by customer, or, if applicable, upon completion of customer acceptance provisions. For software arrangements with multiple elements, revenue recognition is also dependent upon the availability of VSOE of fair value for each of the elements. The lack of VSOE, or the existence of extended payment terms or other inherent risks, may affect the timing of revenue recognition for software arrangements. If project management and ~~Deferred~~installation ~~Costs~~services are essential to a software arrangement, revenue is recognized upon meeting the software acceptance provisions in the contract. Hardware and software post-sale maintenance support fees are recognized ratably over the life of the related service contract.

~~Deferred~~The ~~revenue~~Company ~~and~~records ~~associated~~reductions ~~incremental~~to ~~direct~~revenue for ~~costs~~estimated ~~result~~commitments ~~primarily~~related ~~from~~to ~~long-term~~liquidated ~~AMI~~damages ~~electric~~ and ~~gas~~contractual ~~contracts~~guarantees. ~~whereby~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~has~~also ~~deployed~~records ~~metering~~reductions ~~infrastructure,~~to ~~shipped product or performed services, including billing customers for the products and services, but for which all~~ revenue ~~recognition criteria~~ for ~~accounting~~expected ~~purposes~~future ~~have~~product ~~not~~returns ~~yet~~based ~~been~~on ~~met~~the ~~(see~~Company’s ~~Revenue Recognition~~historical ~~above)~~experience. ~~Deferred~~The ~~revenue~~Company ~~and~~records ~~deferred~~sales ~~costs~~of licensed ~~are~~technology ~~shown separately within total liabilities and total assets, respectively,~~ in ~~the~~net ~~accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are classified as current or long term based on the period such amounts will be realized~~sales.

Stock-Based Compensation

Sensus 1 maintains a Restricted Share Plan (the “Plan”) that provides for the award of restricted common shares to officers, directors and consultants of the Company. The restricted shares issued pursuant to the Plan are service time vested over five years from the date of grant, provided that no vesting occurs prior to the second anniversary of the date of grant. In addition, the vesting of the restricted shares may accelerate upon the occurrence of certain stated liquidity events. Common shares awarded under the Plan are subject to restrictions on transfer, repurchase rights and other limitations as set forth in the related management subscription and shareholders’ agreement. As of June 30, 2010, there were 2,000,000 restricted shares of Sensus 1 authorized and 999,000 shares issued and outstanding. The outstanding restricted shares were purchased for $0.01 of cash consideration, which at the time of issuance was determined to be the fair market value. No awards were granted under the Plan in the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~The~~Deferred ~~Company~~Revenue ~~accounts for its compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions based on estimated fair values. The Company performed a fair value analysis of its restricted shares as of the grant date~~ and ~~determined~~Deferred ~~that~~Costs no compensation expense was required to be recorded. For each reporting period, the Company performs an evaluation of its contingent repurchase rights on an individual employee-by-employee basis. If the Company’s contingent repurchase features become probable, the Company will assess whether liability classification is appropriate. No compensation expense related to the Plan was recognized for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009.

OnDeferred ~~July 19,~~revenue ~~2007,~~and ~~the~~associated ~~Company’s~~incremental ~~board~~direct ofcosts ~~directors~~result ~~approved~~primarily ~~the~~from ~~Sensus~~long-term ~~Metering~~AMI ~~Systems~~electric ~~2007~~and ~~Stock~~gas ~~Option~~contracts ~~Plan~~whereby (the ~~“Option~~Company ~~Plan”),~~has asdeployed ~~well~~metering asinfrastructure, ashipped ~~form~~product ofor ~~Notice~~performed ofservices, ~~Stock~~including ~~Option~~billing ~~Grant~~customers ~~and Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. The Option Plan provides~~ for the ~~issuance~~products ~~of stock options to employees, directors~~ and ~~consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. A total of 2~~services,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~but offor ~~Sensus~~which 1all ~~Class~~revenue Brecognition ~~common~~criteria ~~stock are authorized~~ for ~~issuance~~accounting ~~upon~~purposes ~~exercise~~have ofnot ~~options~~yet ~~granted~~been ~~pursuant~~met to(see ~~the~~Revenue Recognition ~~Option Plan~~above). ~~The~~Deferred ~~options~~revenue ~~awarded~~and ~~under~~deferred ~~the~~costs ~~Option~~are ~~Plan~~shown ~~have~~separately awithin ~~contractual~~total ~~term~~liabilities ~~of 10 years,~~ and ~~are~~total ~~service time vested over five years from the date of grant~~assets, ~~provided that no vesting occurs prior to the second anniversary of the date of grant~~respectively, ~~and~~in ~~vesting may accelerate upon~~ the ~~occurrence~~accompanying ofconsolidated ~~certain~~balance ~~stated~~sheets ~~liquidity events. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, 56,000 stock options were granted~~ and ~~41,500~~are ~~were~~classified ~~forfeited~~as ~~under~~current ~~the~~or ~~Option~~long ~~Plan.~~term Asbased ofon ~~June 30, 2010, 125,600 of~~ the ~~1,051,000~~period ~~options~~such amounts ~~outstanding~~will ~~under~~be ~~the Option Plan were vested~~realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

Sensus 1 maintains a Restricted Share Plan (the “Plan”) that provides for the award of restricted common shares to officers, directors and consultants of the Company. The restricted shares issued pursuant to the Plan are service time vested over five years from the date of grant, provided that no vesting occurs prior to the second anniversary of the date of grant. In addition, the vesting of the restricted shares may accelerate upon the occurrence of certain stated liquidity events. Common shares awarded under the Plan are subject to restrictions on transfer, repurchase rights and other limitations as set forth in the related management subscription and shareholders’ agreement. As of September 30, 2010, there were 2,000,000 restricted shares of Sensus 1 authorized and 999,000 shares issued and outstanding. The outstanding restricted shares were purchased for $0.01 of cash consideration, which at the time of issuance was determined to be the fair market value. No awards were granted under the Plan in the fiscal quarters and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

The Company accounts for its compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions based on estimated fair values. The Company performed a fair value analysis of its restricted shares as of the grant date and determined that no compensation expense was required to be recorded. For each reporting period, the Company performs an evaluation of its contingent repurchase rights on an individual employee-by-employee basis. If the Company’s contingent repurchase features become probable, the Company will assess whether liability classification is appropriate. No compensation expense related to the Plan was recognized for the fiscal quarters and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

On July 19, 2007, the Company’s board of directors approved the Sensus Metering Systems 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”), as well as a form of Notice of Stock Option Grant and Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. The Option Plan provides for the issuance of stock options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. A total of 2,000,000 shares of Sensus 1 Class B common stock are authorized for issuance upon exercise of options granted pursuant to the Option Plan. The options awarded under the Option Plan have a contractual term of 10 years, and are service time vested over five years from the date of grant, provided that no vesting occurs prior to the second anniversary of the date of grant, and vesting may accelerate upon the occurrence of certain stated liquidity events. During the fiscal quarter and six months ended September 30, 2010, 83,000 and 139,000 stock options were granted and 18,500 and 60,000 were forfeited under the Option Plan, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, 196,400 of the 1,115,500 options outstanding under the Option Plan were vested.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, including consideration of non-performance risk, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., an exit price).

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the inputs used to estimate fair value into three levels based upon their observability. Level 1 has the highest priority and Level 3 the lowest. If an input is based on bid and ask prices, the guidance permits the use of a mid-market pricing convention. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

•

Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2 inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices (in non-active markets or in active markets for similar assets or liabilities), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs that are not directly observable, but that are corroborated by observable market data.

•

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to the extent that observable inputs are not available, allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for an asset or liability.

For the current fiscal quarter, fair value measurements affect the Company’s contingent consideration and derivative instruments as disclosed in Note 2 Acquisitions and Note 5 Financial Instruments, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash, trade receivables and trade payables approximated fair values as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and ~~June~~March 2731, ~~2009~~ 2010. The estimated fair value of the Company’s term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was $~~202~~215.08 million and $186.8 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Company’s 8.625% senior subordinated notes was approximately $272.3 million both at September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, compared to its face value of $275.0 million. The fair value of these notes was determined based upon recent market transactions and dealer indicative pricing.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

estimated fair value of the Company’s 8.625% senior subordinated notes was approximately $266.8 million and $272.3 million at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively, compared to its face value of $275.0 million. The fair value of these notes was determined based upon recent market transactions and dealer indicative pricing.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the financial statements. Due to various factors affecting future costs and operations, actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Acquisitions

Rongtai. On July 27, 2005, the Company formed a joint venture in China for its Sensus Precision Die Casting business with Yangzhou Runlin Investment Co., Ltd. The joint venture was called Sensus-Rongtai (Yangzhou) Precision Die Casting Co., Ltd. (“PDC Rongtai”). On September 29, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of the 40% noncontrolling interest held by Yangzhou Runlin Investment Co., Ltd. As a result of the acquisition and in accordance with the terms of the equity transfer agreement, PDC Rongtai became wholly owned by a subsidiary of the Company and was subsequently renamed Sensus Precision Die Casting (Yangzhou) Co., Ltd. The terms of the agreement include total consideration with an estimated fair value of $18.8 million consisting of:

• $6.0 million in cash at closing; and

• $412.8 million ~~that is expected~~ to be paid in ~~September~~the ~~2010;~~fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011.

•The carrying value of the non-controlling interest at September 29, 2009 was $08.48 million. ~~installment~~The ~~that~~$10.0 ismillion ~~expected~~of excess consideration paid and to be paid inover ~~September~~the ~~2010;~~carrying ~~and~~value of the noncontrolling interest decreased paid-in capital.

• $7.6 million of estimated contingent consideration based on certain earnings performance measures that is expected to be paid in October 2010.

The carrying value of the non-controlling interest at September 29, 2009 was $9.0 million. The $9.8 million of excess consideration paid and to be paid over the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest decreased paid-in capital.

In conjunction with the equity transfer agreement, the Company had entered into a real estate transfer contract with Yangzhou Rongtai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (“Yangzhou”) to sell certain buildings, ancillary equipment and land-use rights to Yangzhou for approximately $2.0 million. These assets are included in the Company’s all other segment. Title to the transferred property will pass to Yangzhou upon receipt of the required regulatory approvals. In the interim, the Company continues to use the existing facilities in the normal course of operations and production; accordingly, the facilities will remain classified as held and used and continue to be depreciated.

Telemetric. On June 30, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Telemetric Corporation (“Telemetric”) for approximately $6.8 million in cash at closing and $1.0 million payable within approximately one year of the closing date of the related asset purchase agreement. Additional cash consideration may become payable based on the performance of the acquired business through June 2013. Acquisition-date fair value for this contingent consideration was estimated at $3.9 million. The Company financed the transaction primarily with cash on hand and borrowings under its senior credit facilities. Telemetric provides utilities with distribution automation systems that use commercial cellular networks and PowerVistaTM, a web-based software application. This acquisition provides the Company with a significant and

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In conjunction with the equity transfer agreement, the Company had entered into a real ~~established~~estate ~~presence~~transfer contract with Yangzhou Rongtai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (“Yangzhou”) to sell certain buildings, ancillary equipment and land-use rights to Yangzhou for approximately $2.0 million. These assets are included in the Company’s ~~distribution~~all ~~automation~~other ~~portion~~segment. Title to the transferred property will pass to Yangzhou upon receipt of the ~~utility~~required ~~landscape~~regulatory ~~and~~approvals. ~~augments~~In the interim, the Company’s ~~AMI~~continues to use the existing facilities in the normal course of operations and production; ~~smart~~accordingly, ~~grid~~the ~~solutions~~facilities remain classified as held and used and continue to be depreciated.

Telemetric. On June 30, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Telemetric Corporation (“Telemetric”) for approximately $11.7 million, including $6.8 million in cash at closing and $1.0 million payable within approximately one year of the closing date of the related asset purchase agreement, of which $0.7 million was paid in fiscal 2010 and $0.3 million in fiscal 2011. Additional cash consideration may become payable based on the performance of the acquired business through June 2013. Acquisition-date fair value for this contingent consideration was estimated at $3.9 million. The Company financed the transaction primarily with cash on hand and borrowings under its senior credit facilities. Telemetric provides utilities with distribution automation systems that use commercial cellular networks and PowerVista^TM, a web-based software application. This acquisition provides the Company with a significant and established presence in the distribution automation portion of the utility landscape and augments the Company’s AMI and smart grid solutions.

The Company recorded $4.6 million of goodwill related to the acquisition. This value is attributable primarily to the expected synergies arising from the complementary technologies of Telemetric and the Company as well as the assembled workforce. Goodwill related to the acquisition was assigned to the Company’s utility infrastructure and related communication systems segment, and is deductible for income tax purposes over 15 years.

~~Consideration~~Acquisition-related ~~and~~costs of $0.2 million for the ~~net~~fiscal ~~assets~~quarters ended ~~recognized~~September 30, as2010 ofand 2009 and $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the ~~acquisition date~~six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are ~~summarized~~classified as other operating expense, net in the ~~table~~accompanying ~~below~~consolidated ~~(in~~statements ~~millions):~~of operations.

	June 30,2009
Consideration:
Cash	$	6.8
Payable within one year		1.0
Contingent (performance based)		3.9
Fair value of total consideration	$	11.7
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
Assets
Current assets:
Accounts receivable, trade	$	0.3
Inventories, net		0.7
Total current assets		1.0
Property, plant and equipment, net		0.1
Intangible assets, net		7.1
Goodwill		4.6
Total assets	$	12.8
Liabilities	$	1.1
Net assets acquired	$	11.7

The contingent consideration component of the purchase consideration will become payable if the acquired business achieves certain financial performance measures through June 2013, and is subject to a $12 million cap. Payments on an undiscounted basis are projected to be $5.8 million. The estimated fair value of the contingent purchase consideration is based upon management-developed forecasts, a level 3 input in the fair value hierarchy. These cash flows are discounted based upon a weighted-average cost-of-capital (“WACC”) in arriving at the acquisition-date fair value of $3.9 million. The discount rate was developed using market participant company data, a level 2 input in the fair value hierarchy. From the date of acquisition to September 30, 2010, there have been no significant changes in the $5.8 million estimate of undiscounted cash flows. During that same time period, $0.8 million was accreted to the fair value of the contingent consideration for the passage of time, with the corresponding expense classified as other operating expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In accordance with the purchase agreement a payment of $1.0 million of contingent consideration was made in fiscal 2011.

Acquisition-related costs of $0.1 million for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 are classified as other operating expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The contingent consideration component of the purchase consideration will become payable if the acquired business achieves certain financial performance measures through June 2013, and is subject to a $12 million cap. Payments on an undiscounted basis are projected to be $5.8 million. The estimated fair value of the contingent purchase consideration is based upon management-developed forecasts, a level 3 input in the fair value hierarchy. These cash flows are discounted based upon a weighted-average cost-of-capital (“WACC”) in arriving at the acquisition-date fair value of $3.9 million. The discount rate was developed using market participant company data, a level 2 input in the fair value hierarchy. From the date of acquisition to June 30, 2010, there have been no significant changes in the $5.8 million estimate of undiscounted cash flows. During that same time period, $0.6 million was accreted to the fair value of the contingent consideration for the passage of time, with the corresponding expense classified as other operating expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table presents the fair value measurements of contingent consideration and the associated fair value hierarchy level as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 (in millions):

	Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value		~~Quoted Prices in ActiveMarkets for IdenticalLiabilities(Level 1)~~	Quoted Prices in ActiveMarkets for IdenticalLiabilities(Level 1)		~~Significant OtherObservableInputs(Level 2)~~		Significant OtherObservableInputs(Level 2)	~~SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)~~			SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration	$	43.67	$	—$	—	$	—	$	$—	~~4.6~~	~~(1)~~	$	3.7	(1)

(1)	Note that because there are both level 2 and level 3 inputs included in the determination of fair value of the contingent consideration, the Company has characterized this measure as level 3.

AMDS. On July 6, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Advanced Metering Data Systems, L.L.C. (“AMDS”) for $62.6 million consisting of $49.8 million in cash and 15,000 vested preference shares issued by Sensus 1. The Company financed the transaction with equity contributions totaling $30.4 million in cash from Sensus 1, cash on hand and utilization of the Company’s revolving credit facility. As discussed below, the vested preference shares were subject to mandatory redemption by Sensus 1 for $15 million at the option of the holder once certain future financial performance targets were achieved.

During fiscal 2008 and 2009, the performance thresholds were achieved related to the vested preference shares. Accordingly, 15,000 vested preference shares were released from restrictions, and in fiscal 2009, AMDS opted to have the 15,000 unrestricted shares redeemed for $15 million in cash. As required by the AMDS purchase agreement, the $15 million was funded by Sensus 1 during fiscal 2009, and thus the Company’s cash position was not impacted.

The Company is required to make additional future cash payments to AMDS based on certain financial performance measures of the acquired business through March 2011. Related to the performance of the acquired business, the Company accrued $1015.58 million for the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and $5625.16 million cumulatively, net of $1847.92 million paid in accordance with the purchase agreement ($0.9 million in fiscal 2008, $4.6 million in fiscal 2009, ~~and~~ $13.4 million in fiscal 2010 and $28.3 million in fiscal 2011). In the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, $2817.36 million is classified as accruals and other current liabilities and $~~27.~~8.0 million is classified as other long-term liabilities. The offset to these accrued amounts reflects additional purchase price and is classified as goodwill.

In addition, on the date of acquisition, Sensus 1 issued 15,000 unvested preference shares to AMDS, which were subject to vesting based on the performance of the acquired business over a five-year period following closing. The redemption value of the unvested preference shares was $15 million if the specified performance thresholds were achieved over the relevant period. During fiscal 2010, the performance thresholds were achieved related to the unvested preference shares, and all of these preference shares became vested. Accordingly, 15,000 vested preference shares were released from restrictions, and in fiscal 2010, AMDS opted to have the 15,000 unrestricted shares redeemed for cash. As required by the AMDS purchase agreement, the $15 million was funded by Sensus 1, and thus the Company’s cash position was not impacted.

Cumulative accrued amounts to be paid in cash and any additional future cash consideration represent additional purchase price and increase the amount of recorded goodwill when the contingencies are resolved. The operating results from the AMDS acquisition have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

3. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of tradenames, patents, non-competition agreements, developed technology and customer and distributor relationships. Goodwill of $~~464~~459.42 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 represents the excess of the purchase price paid by the Company for Invensys Metering Systems, NexusData, Inc., AMDS and Telemetric over the fair value of the net assets acquired. The goodwill is attributed to the value placed on the Company being an industry leader with market-leading positions in the North American and European water metering markets, the North American clamps and couplings market and the expected synergies ~~resulting~~ resulting primarily from the AMDS and Telemetric acquisitions. The Company is also a market leader in the North American gas metering market, the European heat metering market and the North American water AMI market. The Company has achieved these ~~leadership~~ leadership positions by developing and manufacturing innovative products. In addition, future expansion of AMI technology provides a significant opportunity for the Company. Patents, trademarks, developed technology, customer and distributor relationships and non-competition agreements are stated at fair value on the date of acquisition as determined by an independent valuation firm.

Intangible assets are summarized as follows (in millions):

	June 30, 2010						March 31, 2010
	September 30, 2010							March 31, 2010
	Cost		~~AccumulatedAmortization~~	AccumulatedAmortization			~~Cost~~	Cost		~~AccumulatedAmortization~~		AccumulatedAmortization
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Goodwill	$	~~464~~459.42	$	—$	—		$	~~453.8~~$	443.3	$	—	$	—
Tradenames (indefinite lived)		25.0		—	—			~~25.0~~	25.0		—		—
		489.4		—				478.8			—
		484.2			—				468.3				—
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Distributor and marketing relationships		~~204~~207.52		~~(69.4~~	)(71.3	)		~~204.5~~	204.5		~~(67.2~~	)	(67.2	)
Developed technology		28.3		~~(8.9~~	)(9.6	)		~~28.3~~	28.3		~~(8.3~~	)	(8.3	)
Non-competition agreements		30.5		~~(30.4~~	)(30.5	)		~~30.5~~	30.5		~~(30.4~~	)	(30.4	)
Patents		16.24		~~(12.8~~	)(13.3	)		~~16.4~~	16.4		~~(12.8~~	)	(12.8	)
Tradenames (definite lived)		3.2		~~(1.5~~	)(1.8	)		~~3.2~~	3.2		~~(1.2~~	)	(1.2	)
		282.7		(123.0	)			282.9			(119.9	)
		285.6			(126.5	)			282.9				(119.9	)
Total intangible assets	$	~~772~~769.18	$	~~(123.0~~$	)(126.5	)	$	~~761.7~~$	751.2	$	~~(119.9~~	)$	(119.9	)

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in millions):

	June 30,2010			March 31,2010
	September 30,2010			March 31,2010
Raw materials, parts and supplies	$	3938.43		$	37.46
Work in process		1012.51			10.4
Finished goods		1922.18			21.1
Allowance for shrink and obsolescence		(2.76	)		(1.9	)
Inventories, net	$	6670.36		$	67.02

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5. Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes derivative instruments, specifically forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements, to manage its exposure to market risks such as foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks. The Company records derivative instruments as assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet, measured at fair value. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company had no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding.

The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on variable-rate debt. ~~The~~As of ~~Company~~September 30, ~~has~~2010, ~~entered~~the ~~into~~Company ~~various~~has no interest rate swap agreements ~~in which it receives periodic variable interest payments at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and makes periodic payments at specified fixed rates~~outstanding.

~~The~~6. ~~following~~Restructuring ~~table~~Costs ~~describes the terms of the Company’s interest rate swap agreement:~~

Trade Date		Effective Date		Maturity Date		NotionalAmount(in millions)			PayFixedRate			ReceiveThree-MonthLIBOR as ofJune 30, 2010
December 9, 2005		January 20, 2006		September 30, 2010		$	50.0		4.927	%		0.30531	%

The following reflects activity associated with costs related to the Company’s restructuring initiatives (in millions):

As of June 30, 2010, the Company has discontinued the hedging relationship on all of its outstanding interest rate swaps, and accordingly we no longer receive hedge accounting treatment for changes in market value. Prior to termination of the hedging relationship, changes in market value were recorded in other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet. Upon termination of the hedging relationship, the amount recorded in other comprehensive income was fixed and will be amortized to income through interest expense over the remaining life of the swap. Prospectively, all changes in the fair market value of the swaps will be recorded through earnings in interest expense. All of the Company’s interest rate swaps are due to expire by September 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the unamortized accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with these swaps was $0.3 million before tax. This amount is being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis through September 30, 2010. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company amortized $0.5 million (net of tax of $0.3 million) of other comprehensive loss.


	Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010			Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009		Six Months Ended September 30, 2010			Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
Employee severance and exit costs:
Accrued	$	0.6		$	2.3	$	1.2		$	8.7
Expensed as incurred		0.4			0.7		0.8			1.1

		1.0			3.0		2.0			9.8
Impairment of long-lived assets:
Accrued		(0.1	)		—		(0.1	)		—
Expensed as incurred		0.1			—		0.1			—

		—			—		—			—
Other costs expensed as incurred		0.9			—		0.9			—

Total	$	1.9		$	3.0	$	2.9		$	9.8

~~Our~~For ~~derivative~~the ~~instruments~~fiscal ~~are~~quarter ~~valued~~and ~~using~~six ~~modeling~~months ~~techniques~~ended ~~that~~September 30, ~~incorporate~~2010, ~~level~~the 2Company ~~observable~~incurred ~~inputs~~$1.9 asmillion ~~defined~~and $2.9 bymillion, ~~GAAP.~~respectively, ~~Key~~of ~~inputs include~~restructuring ~~interest~~costs ~~rate~~primarily ~~yield~~related ~~curves,~~to ~~foreign~~the ~~exchange~~rationalization ~~rates,~~of ~~spot~~its ~~prices~~water and ~~volatility.~~heat ~~The~~meter ~~following~~product ~~table~~lines ~~presents~~across Europe, the ~~fair~~Middle ~~value~~East, ~~measurements~~Africa ofand ~~our~~South ~~derivatives~~America, ~~and~~an ~~their~~early ~~associated~~retirement ~~fair~~program ~~value~~in ~~hierarchy~~Germany ~~level~~and asalignment activities ofassociated ~~June 30,~~with ~~2010~~global ~~(in millions):~~manufacturing operations.

	Fair Value		Fair Value Measurements
			Quoted Prices in ActiveMarkets for IdenticalLiabilities(Level 1)		Significant OtherObservableInputs(Level 2)		SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	0.6	$	—	$	0.6	$	—

On September 18, 2008, Sensus GmbH Ludwigshafen, a subsidiary of the Company, reached an understanding with its German works council on the general terms of a restructuring of the Ludwigshafen operations. The restructuring is part of a plan adopted by the Company to improve the competitiveness of its German operations. The restructuring is expected to include the closure of certain production lines at the facility and a reduction of approximately 180 employees. As a result of this reduction of employees, the Company expects to record total charges of approximately $29.2 million of severance and related payroll costs. The Company currently expects that these restructuring measures will be substantially concluded by December 31, 2011. During the current fiscal quarter and six-month period, the Company accrued $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the reduction of employees. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has cumulatively accrued $27.2 million under this plan. The Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs for this and other programs of approximately $3.4 million in fiscal 2011.

As of June 30, 2010, interest rate swaps are classified within accruals and other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

6. Restructuring Costs

The following reflects activity associated with costs related to the Company’s restructuring initiatives (in millions):

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010		Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
Employee severance and exit costs:
Accrued	$	0.6	$	6.4
Expensed as incurred		0.4		0.4
Total	$	1.0	$	6.8

For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred $1.0 million of restructuring costs primarily related to the rationalization of its water and heat meter product lines across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and South America and an early retirement program in Germany.

On September 18, 2008, Sensus GmbH Ludwigshafen, a subsidiary of the Company, reached an understanding with its German works council on the general terms of a restructuring of the Ludwigshafen operations. The restructuring is part of a plan adopted by the Company to improve the competitiveness of its German operations. The restructuring is expected to include the closure of certain production lines at the facility and a reduction of approximately 180 employees. As a result of this reduction of employees, the Company expects to record total charges of approximately $26.1 million of severance and related payroll costs. The Company currently expects that these restructuring measures will be substantially concluded by December 31, 2011. During the current fiscal quarter, the Company accrued $0.3 million for the reduction of employees. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has cumulatively accrued $24.3 million under this plan. The Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs for this and other programs of approximately $0.8 million in fiscal 2011.

Changes in restructuring accruals are summarized as follows (in millions):

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2009			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2009
Balance at beginning of year	$	15.9		$	9.1
Balance at beginning of period	$	11.3		$	10.7		$	15.9		$	9.1
Accrual of new committed/announced programs		0.6			62.43			1.2			8.7
Cash payments		(30.95	)		(5.1.5	)		(4.4	)		(6.6	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1.3	)		0.35			—			0.8
Balance at end of period	$	1112.37		$	1012.70		$	12.7		$	12.0
Current portion	$	89.67		$	810.81		$	9.7		$	10.1
Non-current portion		23.70			1.9			3.0			1.9
Total	$	1112.37		$	1012.70		$	12.7		$	12.0

Restructuring accruals are reflected within current liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, restricted cash of $3.4.2 million, consisting of $2.0 million classified as other long-term assets and $12.42 million classified as prepayments and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, was earmarked to fund the Company’s early retirement contracts for certain of its German employees.

7. Warranty Obligations

Product warranty reserves are established in the same period that revenue from the sale of the related products is recognized. The amounts of those reserves are based on established terms and the Company’s estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Warranty reserves are reflected within accruals and other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Changes in product warranty reserves are summarized as follows (in millions):


	Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010			Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009			Six Months Ended September 30, 2010			Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	12.1		$	13.8		$	11.9		$	13.7
Warranty provision		2.2			1.1			5.5			3.0
Settlements made		(3.0	)		(2.0	)		(5.9	)		(4.0	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		0.2			0.1			—			0.3

Balance at end of period	$	11.5		$	13.0		$	11.5		$	13.0

Current portion	$	10.9		$	11.1			10.9		$	11.1
Non-current portion		0.6			1.9			0.6			1.9

Total	$	11.5		$	13.0		$	11.5		$	13.0

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

7. Warranty Obligations

Changes in product warranty reserves are summarized as follows (in millions):

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
Balance at beginning of year	$	10.3		$	11.7
Warranty provision		3.3			1.9
Settlements made		(2.9	)		(2.0	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(0.2	)		0.2
Balance at end of period	$	10.5		$	11.8
Current portion	$	9.5		$	8.8
Non-current portion		1.0			3.0
Total	$	10.5		$	11.8

8. Retirement Benefits

The Company has defined benefit plans in Germany and the United States. Pension benefits in Germany for salaried employees generally are based on years of credited service and average earnings. Pension benefits for hourly employees generally are based on specified benefit amounts and years of service. The U.S. defined benefit plan consists of only unionized hourly employees. The Company’s policy is to fund its pension obligations in conformity with the funding requirements of laws and governmental regulations applicable in the respective country.

Net periodic benefit cost for the German pension plan consists of the following (in millions):

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010		Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2009		Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010		Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2009
Service cost	$	0.3	$	~~0.3~~$	0.3	$	0.6	$	0.6
Interest cost		0.67		~~0.7~~	0.7		1.3		1.4
Net periodic benefit cost	$	01.90	$	~~1.0~~$	1.0	$	1.9	$	2.0

Net periodic pension cost for the U.S. pension plan consists of the following (in millions):

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30,2009			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2009
Service cost	$	0.32		$	0.23		$	0.5		$	0.5
Interest cost		0.1			0.1			0.2			0.2
Expected return on plan assets		(0.1	)		—(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.1	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	0.32		$	0.3		$	0.5		$	0.6

16The Company expects to continue to make contributions sufficient to fund benefits paid under its U.S. pension plan. The Company contributed approximately $0.6 million in the first half of fiscal 2011 to its U.S. plan. Total contributions for the current fiscal year will approximate $1.1 million, and further contributions may be made at the Company’s discretion.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company expects to continue to make contributions sufficient to fund benefits paid under its U.S. pension plan. The Company contributed approximately $0.2 million in the current fiscal quarter to its U.S. plan. Such contributions for the current fiscal year will be approximately $1.1 million, and additional contributions may be made at the Company’s discretion.

9. Business Segment Information

Reporting Segments. The Company has two principal product groups: utility infrastructure systems products and support products. Utility infrastructure systems products include AMI and AMR communications systems, distribution automation and demand response systems and four principal metering product categories: water, gas, heat and electricity. Support products include pipe joining and repair products and die casting products. The two product groups, plus corporate operations, are organized into two reporting segments: Utility Infrastructure and Related Communication Systems and All Other.

Utility Infrastructure and Related Communication Systems revenues consist solely of third-party sales. All Other revenues consist of third-party and inter-segment sales.

Inter-segment sales generally approximate cost. Cost of sales is based on standard cost, which includes materials, direct labor, warranty expense, overhead allocation, as well as variances from standard costs. Operating expenses directly associated with the reporting group include sales, marketing, product development and administrative expenses and amortization of intangible assets.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Corporate operating expenses, interest expense, amortization of intangible assets and deferred financing costs, and management fees are not allocated to the product lines and are incorporated in the All Other operating segment.

Reporting Segment Products


Reporting Segment		Major Products
Utility Infrastructure and Related Communication Systems		Fixed network AMI, AMR systems; commercial and residential water, gas, electric and heat meters used by utilities. Fixed network AMI systems include communications technology, hardware and software. AMR systems include handheld and mobile radio-frequency reading systems. All AMI and meter reading system solutions include installation services and ongoing systems support.

All Other		Pipe joining, tapping and repair products that consist principally of pipe couplings, tapping sleeves and saddles, and repair clamps that are used by utilities in pipe joining and pipe repair applications. Die casting products that consist of high quality thin-wall, low porosity aluminum die castings, generally targeting the automotive industry and gas utility markets.

The following table provides revenue, operating income and pre-tax (loss) income for each segment (in millions):


	Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010			Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009			Six Months Ended September 30, 2010			Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
Segment revenue
Utility infrastructure and related communication systems	$	170.6		$	170.3		$	363.3		$	339.2
All other		32.7			33.9			65.2			61.3
Eliminations		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.5	)		(1.1	)

Total	$	203.2		$	204.0		$	428.0		$	399.4

Operating income (loss)
Utility infrastructure and related communication systems	$	9.3		$	8.8		$	26.6		$	13.2
All other		(2.4	)		(5.6	)		(3.6	)		(6.0	)

Total	$	6.9		$	3.2		$	23.0		$	7.2

(Loss) income before income taxes
Utility infrastructure and related communication systems	$	8.5		$	7.8		$	25.1		$	13.4
All other		(13.5	)		(16.5	)		(25.0	)		(25.6	)

Total	$	(5.0	)	$	(8.7	)	$	0.1		$	(12.2	)

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table provides revenue, operating income and pre-tax income for each segment (in millions):

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
Segment revenue
Utility infrastructure and related communication systems	$	193.7		$	173.8
All other		32.5			27.4
Eliminations		(0.4	)		(0.9	)
Total	$	225.8		$	200.3
Operating income (loss)
Utility infrastructure and related communication systems	$	17.8		$	9.1
All other		(2.1	)		(0.3	)
Total	$	15.7		$	8.8
Income (loss) before income taxes
Utility infrastructure and related communication systems	$	17.1		$	10.3
All other		(12.4	)		(9.0	)
Total	$	4.7		$	1.3

Geographic Regions. Net sales to third parties and long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows (in millions):

	Net Sales to Third Parties					~~Long-Lived Assets~~		Long-Lived Assets
	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010		Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009			June 30,2010			March 31,2010
	Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2009				September 30,2010			March 31,2010
North America	$	~~163~~296.3		~~141.8~~$	279.3		~~74.7~~	$	$72.9	~~74.8~~	$	73.4
Europe, Middle East, Africa		47101.13		~~46.7~~	94.0		~~33.8~~		36.9	~~38.2~~		38.2
South America		48.12		~~3.6~~	7.8		~~1.8~~		1.9	~~1.7~~		1.7
Asia		1122.32		~~8.2~~	18.3		~~22.3~~		22.3	~~21.6~~		21.6
Total	$	~~225~~428.80	$	~~200.3~~$	399.4	$	~~132.6~~	$	$134.0	~~136.3~~	$	134.9

Net sales to third parties are attributed to the geographic regions based on the country in which the shipment originates. Amounts attributed to the geographic regions for long-lived assets are based on the location of the entity that holds such assets. Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, net.

10. Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Comprehensive (loss) income consists of the following (in millions):


	Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010			Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009			Six Months Ended September 30, 2010			Six Months Ended September 30, 2009
Consolidated net loss	$	(4.0	)	$	(6.2	)	$	(1.5	)	$	(8.9	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		1.2			1.0			1.2			1.9
Defined benefit pension adjustment		0.1			—			0.1			—
Net gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax		0.1			0.7			0.6			1.0

Consolidated comprehensive (loss) income	$	(2.6	)	$	(4.5	)	$	0.4		$	(6.0	)

Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	(0.3	)	$	(0.6	)	$	(0.8	)	$	(1.4	)

Comprehensive loss attributable to controlling interest	$	(2.9	)	$	(5.1	)	$	(0.4	)	$	(7.4	)

11. Income Taxes

Income tax (benefit) expense for the fiscal quarter and six months ended September 30, 2010 reflects the Company’s pre-tax (loss) income based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate.

The Company had $4.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2010, including interest and penalties, $3.3 million of which is reflected in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized in a future period, would affect the effective rate was $4.1 million as of September 30, 2010.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

10The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. ~~Comprehensive~~As ~~Income~~of September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the Company accrued $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in other long-term liabilities for interest and penalties.

~~Comprehensive~~Due ~~income~~to ~~consists~~the expiration of foreign and state statutes of limitations, settlements with tax authorities and tax law changes, it is reasonably possible that the ~~following~~Company’s ~~(in~~net ~~millions):~~unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next 12 months but would be immaterial.

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
Consolidated net income	$	2.2		$	0.3
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		—			0.9
Net gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax (see Note 5)		0.5			0.3
Consolidated comprehensive income	$	2.7		$	1.5
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest	$	(0.5	)	$	(0.8	)
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest	$	2.2		$	0.7

As of April 1, 2010, the Company is subject to foreign and U.S. federal income tax examination for fiscal years ending March 31, 2007 through 2010, and it is subject to U.S. state and local income tax examination for fiscal years ending March 31, 2006 through 2010. Presently, the Company is under audit in two U.S. jurisdictions and one foreign jurisdiction.

11. Income Taxes

The income tax expense for the current fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 reflects the Company’s pre-tax income based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate.

The Company had $4.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2010, including interest and penalties, $3.3 million of which is reflected in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized in a future period, would affect the effective rate was $4.0 million as of June 30, 2010.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the Company accrued $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in other long-term liabilities for interest and penalties.

Due to the expiration of foreign, federal and state statutes of limitations, settlements with tax authorities and tax law changes, it is reasonably possible that the Company’s net unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next 12 months but would be immaterial.

As of April 1, 2010, the Company is subject to foreign and U.S. federal income tax examination for fiscal years ending March 31, 2007 through 2010, and it is subject to U.S. state and local income tax examination for fiscal years ending March 31, 2006 through 2010. Presently, the Company is under audit in one U.S. jurisdiction and one foreign jurisdiction.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is, from time to time, involved in various unresolved legal actions, administrative proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of its business involving product liability, product warranty, property damage, insurance coverage, intellectual property and environmental matters. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these unresolved legal actions or the range of possible loss or recovery, based upon current information, management believes these unresolved legal actions will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company, as well as many other third parties, has been named as a defendant in several lawsuits filed related to illnesses from exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products. The plaintiffs claim unspecified damages. The complaints filed in connection with these proceedings do not specify which plaintiffs allegedly were involved with the Company’s products, and it is uncertain whether any plaintiffs have asbestos-related illnesses or dealt with the Company’s products, much less whether any plaintiffs were exposed to an asbestos-containing component part of the Company’s product or whether such part could have been a substantial contributing factor to the alleged illness. Although we are entitled to indemnification for legal and indemnity costs for asbestos claims related to these products from certain subsidiaries of Invensys, under the stock purchase agreement pursuant to which we acquired Invensys Metering Systems, such indemnities, when aggregated with all other indemnity claims, are limited to the purchase price paid by us in connection with the acquisition of Invensys Metering Systems.

On December 23, 2008, the Company was sued in a breach of contract action filed by Cannon Technologies, Inc. (“Cannon”). The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, breach of warranty and fraud with respect to electricity meters sold to Cannon and seeks unspecified damages, interest costs and attorneys’ fees.

On January 29, 2009, the Company, along with a number of other automated metering infrastructure vendors, was sued in a patent infringement lawsuit filed by IP Co., LLC (“IP Co.”). The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and alleges that the Company’s FlexNet System infringes two patents allegedly owned by IP Co. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for patent infringement, treble damages for intentional infringement, an injunction against further infringement, interest costs and attorneys’ fees.

On March 13, 2009, the Company was sued in a patent infringement lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“EON”). This lawsuit alleges the infringement of two patents allegedly owned by EON (the “EON Patents”). The lawsuit alleges that the Company infringes the EON Patents by “making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling two-way communication networks and/or data systems that fall within the scope of at least one claim of each of the EON Patents.” The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, an injunction against further infringement, interest costs and attorneys’ fees.

On September 9, 2009, the Company was notified of an arbitration commenced against the Company in Pittsburgh under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The claim is by Power Sales and Service (“Power Sales”), a terminated distributor. Power Sales claims commissions allegedly due under its contract with the Company before it was terminated.

~~On November 24,~~19 2009, the Company was sued in a patent infringement lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by SIPCO, LLC (“SIPCO”). The lawsuit generally alleges that the Company’s FlexNet system and/or components thereof infringe(s) three patents allegedly owned by SIPCO. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, an injunction, litigation costs and attorneys’ fees.

On February 22, 2010, the Company and one of its distributors, Aqua-Metric Sales Co. (“Aqua-Metric”) were sued by Valley Center Municipal Water District (the “District”). The lawsuit was filed in the California Superior Court, San Diego County and alleges breach of contract and breach of express and implied warranties related to water meters supplied to the District. The suit claims unspecified damages. The Company has agreed to indemnify Aqua-Metric under its contract with Aqua-Metric, subject to a reservation of rights.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On April 6, 2010, the Company, along with approximately a dozen other companies, was sued by a group of individual plaintiffs in North Carolina State Court, Wake County over injuries and deaths suffered in an explosion at a factory in rural North Carolina. The plaintiffs claim unspecified damages. As discovery has only just commenced, it is impossible to know the Company’s exposure, if any, in the lawsuit.

The Company is unable to estimate the amount of its exposure, if any, related to ~~these~~the foregoing claims that are pending at this time. The Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these issues will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

~~The~~On September 30, 2010, the Company ~~has~~settled ~~entered~~two ~~into~~patent ~~various~~infringement ~~agreements~~lawsuits previously filed against the Company by IP Co., LLC (“IP Co.”) and SIPCO, LLC (“SIPCO”) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuits generally alleged that ~~require~~the ~~letters~~Company’s FlexNet System infringed upon patents owned by IP Co. and SIPCO. As part of ~~credit~~the settlement, the Company agreed to pay IP Co. and SIPCO approximately $4 million, payable in two installments, for ~~financial~~a ~~assurance~~non-exclusive ~~purposes~~license to use certain patents owned by IP Co. ~~These~~and SIPCO. The first ~~letters~~installment payment of ~~credit~~approximately ~~are~~$2 ~~available~~million towas ~~fund~~paid by the Company in October 2010 and the second installment payment of ~~such~~approximately ~~obligations.~~$2 Atmillion ~~June~~is payable by the Company on or before December 3029, 2010,. Under the ~~Company~~transaction ~~had~~the Company expensed $~~15.~~0.8 million of ~~letters~~patent ofsettlement ~~credit~~costs ~~outstanding~~in ~~that~~the ~~had~~fiscal ~~not~~quarter ~~been~~ended ~~drawn~~September 30, ~~upon~~2010 ~~with~~that ~~expiration~~was ~~dates~~related ~~ranging~~to ~~from~~benefits ~~one~~received ~~month~~by the Company in and prior to 12that ~~months~~period.

On October 8, 2010, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with one of its customers relating to the Company’s alleged failure to meet certain product, service and software specifications and performance schedules set forth in the underlying master purchase and related support agreements (collectively, the “Infrastructure Agreements”). In connection with this settlement, the Company has agreed to pay the customer $3.3 million on or before December 22, 2010, representing retroactive product credits. In addition, the Company has committed to provide the customer with approximately $5.9 million of future per unit product discounts. In the event that one or more of the Infrastructure Agreements is terminated due to a material breach by the Company prior to certain contract dates, the Company will be obligated to pay the customer liquidated damages equal to the sum of the present values of certain software fees, annual fees, installment payments or aggregate discounts, as applicable, coming due to the Company, or, in the case of aggregate discounts, owed to the customer, after the relevant termination date. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has deferred revenues of approximately $15 million related to this commitment.

The Company has entered into various agreements that require letters of credit for financial assurance purposes. These letters of credit are available to fund the payment of such obligations. At September 30, 2010, the Company had $14.1 million of letters of credit outstanding that had not been drawn upon with expiration dates ranging from one month to 12 months.

Environmental Matters

The Company is aware of known contamination at the following United States facilities: Russellville, Kentucky; DuBois and Uniontown, Pennsylvania; and Texarkana, Arkansas as a result of historic releases of hazardous materials. The former owner of these sites is investigating, remediating and monitoring these properties. The Company is obligated to reimburse the former owner for a portion of cash paid on the remediation plus interest on cash paid at all sites other than Russellville (the “Reimbursement Sites”), where the former owner pays all remediation costs. The Company is unable to estimate the amount of such costs at this time. In connection with the acquisition of Invensys Metering Systems, certain subsidiaries of Invensys agreed to retain liability for the reimbursement obligations related to the Reimbursement Sites.

In20 addition, there is contamination in the soil and groundwater at our facility in Ludwigshafen, Germany. We were indemnified by the former owner against costs that may result from the contamination, but have accepted a lump-sum payment from the former owner in return for a release of its indemnity obligations. We also have an indemnity, subject to certain limitations, from certain subsidiaries of Invensys regarding this facility pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement governing the acquisition of Invensys Metering Systems.

Based on information currently available, the Company believes that future environmental compliance expenditures will not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations, and has established allowances the Company believes are adequate to cover potential exposure to environmental liabilities. However, as to any of the above described indemnities, we are subject to the credit risk of the indemnifying parties. If the indemnifying parties are unable to reimburse us of our share of the cost of remediation, additional environmental compliance costs and liabilities could reduce the Company’s future net income and cash available for operations.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In addition, there is contamination in the soil and groundwater at our facility in Ludwigshafen, Germany. We were indemnified by the former owner against costs that may result from the contamination, but have accepted a lump-sum payment from the former owner in return for a release of its indemnity obligations. We also have an indemnity, subject to certain limitations, from certain subsidiaries of Invensys regarding this facility pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement governing the acquisition of Invensys Metering Systems.

13. Debt

The Company’s total indebtedness outstanding consists of the following (in millions):

	June 30,2010		March 31,2010
	September 30,2010			March 31,2010
Current portion of U.S. term loan facility	$	158.7	$	~~22.7~~$	22.7
Short-term borrowings		2751.30		~~4.9~~	4.9
Total current portion of long-term debt		4359.07		~~27.6~~	27.6
U.S. term loan facility		162.95		~~163.3~~	163.3
Senior subordinated notes		275.0		~~275.0~~	275.0
Total long-term debt		437.95		~~438.3~~	438.3
Total debt	$	~~480~~497.92	$	~~465.9~~$	465.9

14. Stock-Based Compensation

Sensus 1 maintains a Restricted Share Plan (the “Plan”) that provides for the award of restricted common shares to officers, directors and consultants of the Company. The restricted shares issued pursuant to the Plan are service time vested over five years from the date of grant, provided that no vesting occurs prior to the second anniversary of the date of grant. In addition, the vesting of the restricted shares may accelerate upon the occurrence of certain stated liquidity events. Common shares awarded under the Plan are subject to restrictions on transfer, repurchase rights and other limitations as set forth in the related management subscription and shareholders’ agreement. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were 2,000,000 restricted shares of Sensus 1 authorized and 999,000 shares issued and outstanding. The outstanding restricted shares were purchased for $0.01 of cash consideration, the amount determined to be the fair market value at the date of issuance. No awards were granted under the Plan in the fiscal ~~2010~~quarters orand ~~fiscal~~six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

On21 July 19, 2007, the Company’s board of directors approved the Sensus Metering Systems 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”), as well as a form of Notice of Stock Option Grant and Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. The Option Plan provides for the issuance of stock options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. A total of 2,000,000 shares of Sensus 1 Class B common stock are authorized for issuance upon exercise of options granted pursuant to the Option Plan. The options awarded under the Option Plan have a contractual term of 10 years, and are service time vested over five years from the date of grant, provided that no vesting occurs prior to the second anniversary of the date of grant, and vesting may accelerate upon the occurrence of certain stated liquidity events. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, 56,000 stock options were granted and 41,500 were forfeited under the Option Plan. As of June 30, 2010, 125,600 of the 1,051,000 options outstanding under the Option Plan were vested.

TheTable fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Because the Company’s shares are not publicly traded and the Company does not have a history of issuing stock Contents

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Because the Company’s shares are not publicly traded and the Company does not have a history of issuing stock options, the expected volatility and expected term variables used in the Black-Scholes model were based upon analysis of similar public companies. Expected volatility was based upon historical volatility of similar public companies’ stock prices. Since expected volatility is a measure of both historical and implied volatility, as a point of reference, we then compared this calculated amount to similar public companies’ disclosed expected volatilities for reasonableness. Expected term was developed giving consideration to vesting terms, contractual life and review of disclosure of similar public companies. Given that our shares are not publicly traded and we do not have a history of granting stock options, we believe that this approach provides a reasonable estimate of expected volatility and expected term. The risk-free interest rate was based upon the U.S. Treasury note stripped principal rate corresponding to our estimate of expected term. Expected dividends were $0, as the Company does not anticipate offering dividends on the shares underlying the options.

The following table summarizes each of these variables for grants of stock options during the fiscal quarters and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:


	Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2010	Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2009	Six Months Ended September 30, 2010	Six months Ended September 30, 2009
Expected volatility	47.9%	48.4%	47.9%	48.4%
Expected term (in years)	5	5	5	5
Risk-free rate	1.7%	2.6%	1.7 – 2.0%	2.6%
Expected dividends	—	—	—	—

A summary of option activity during the six months ended September 30, 2010 is presented in the table below:


	Option shares (in thousands)			Weighted-average exercise price		Weighted-average remaining contractual term in years
Outstanding at March 31, 2010		1,036		$	5.82		8.41
Granted		139			7.50		—
Exercised		—			—		—
Forfeited		(60	)		—		—

Outstanding at September 30, 2010		1,115		$	6.02		8.12

Exercisable at September 30, 2010		196		$	5.50		7.01

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~options,~~The ~~the~~compensation ~~expected~~committee ~~volatility~~of ~~and expected term variables used in~~ the ~~Black-Scholes~~Company’s ~~model~~board ~~were based upon analysis~~ of ~~similar~~directors ~~public~~(the “Compensation ~~companies.~~Committee”) ~~Expected~~determines ~~volatility~~the ~~was~~exercise ~~based~~price ~~upon~~at ~~historical volatility~~the time of ~~similar public companies’ stock prices~~grant. ~~Since~~For ~~expected~~grants ~~volatility~~during isthe afiscal ~~measure~~quarter ofand ~~both~~six ~~historical~~months ~~and~~ended ~~implied volatility~~September 30, ~~as a point of reference~~2010, wethe ~~then~~exercise ~~compared~~price ~~this calculated amount to similar public companies’ disclosed expected volatilities for reasonableness. Expected term~~ was ~~developed giving consideration to vesting terms, contractual life and review of disclosure of similar public companies~~$7.50. ~~Given~~Stock ~~that~~compensation ~~our~~expense ~~shares~~recognized ~~are~~in ~~not~~the fiscal ~~publicly~~quarters ~~traded~~ and wesix domonths ~~not~~ended ~~have a history of granting stock options~~September 30, we2010 ~~believe that this approach provides a reasonable estimate of expected volatility~~ and ~~expected~~2009 ~~term. The risk-free interest rate~~ was ~~based upon the U~~immaterial.S. ~~Treasury~~Unrecognized ~~note~~stock ~~stripped~~compensation ~~principal~~expense ~~rate~~as ~~corresponding to our estimate~~ of ~~expected~~September 30, ~~term.~~2010 ~~Expected~~is ~~dividends were~~ $0.7 million, aswhich ~~the~~is ~~Company~~expected ~~does~~to ~~not~~be ~~anticipate~~recognized ~~offering~~over ~~dividends~~a onweighted-average ~~the~~period ~~shares~~of approximately ~~underlying~~three ~~the options~~years.

The following table summarizes each of these variables for grants of stock options during the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009:

	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010		Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009
Expected volatility	47.9	%	na	*
Expected term (in years)	5		na	*
Risk-free rate	2.0	%	na	*
Expected dividends	—		na	*

* There were no stock options granted during the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2009.

A summary of option activity during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 is presented in the table below:

	Optionshares(in thousands)		Weighted-averageexercise price		Weighted-averageremainingcontractual term in years
Outstanding at March 31, 2010	1,036		$	5.82	8.41
Granted	56			7.50	—
Exercised	—			—	—
Forfeited	(41	)		—	—
Outstanding at June 30, 2010	1,051		$	5.91	8.25
Exercisable at June 30, 2010	126		$	5.50	7.22

The compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) selects the exercise price. For grants during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, the exercise price was $7.50. Stock compensation expense recognized in the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009 was immaterial. Unrecognized stock compensation expense as of June 30, 2010 is $0.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately four years.

Sensus 1 common shares awarded under the Restricted Share Plan and the Option Plan are generally subject to restrictions on transfer, repurchase rights and other limitations as set forth in the related management subscription and shareholders’ agreement. The options to acquire common shares awarded under the Option Plan have exercise prices that are determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant.

15. Guarantor Subsidiaries

The following tables present the condensed consolidating balance sheets at September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010 and unaudited statements of operations and cash flows for the fiscal quarters and six months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, as applicable, for a) Sensus 2 (referred to as Parent), b) Sensus USA Inc. (“Sensus USA”), the issuer of the Notes (referred to as Issuer), c) on a combined basis, the subsidiaries of Sensus 2 that are guaranteeing the Notes (referred to as Guarantor Subsidiaries) and d) on a combined basis, the subsidiaries of Sensus 2 that are not guaranteeing the Notes (referred to as Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). Separate financial statements for the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because Sensus USA and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by Sensus 2, the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several, and the Company believes separate financial statements and other disclosures are not material to investors.

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

~~15.~~Condensed ~~Guarantor~~Consolidating ~~Subsidiaries~~Balance Sheets (unaudited)

~~The following tables present the condensed consolidating balance sheets at June~~September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March 31, 2010 and unaudited statements of operations and cash flows for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009 for a) Sensus 2 (referred to as Parent), b) Sensus USA Inc. (“Sensus USA”), the issuer of the Notes (referred to as Issuer), c) on a combined basis, the subsidiaries of Sensus 2 that are guaranteeing the Notes (referred to as Guarantor Subsidiaries) and d) on a combined basis, the subsidiaries of Sensus 2 that are not guaranteeing the Notes (referred to as Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). Separate financial statements for the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because Sensus USA and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by Sensus 2, the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several, and the Company believes separate financial statements and other disclosures are not material to investors.

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer		Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	11.9	$	0.4		$	28.6		$	—		$	40.9
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		—			43.1		13.3			44.2			—			100.6
(To) from affiliates		(1.2	)		32.8		(2.5	)		(29.1	)		—			—
Other		—			—		0.6			—			—			0.6
Inventories, net		—			28.6		12.6			29.4			—			70.6
Prepayments and other current assets		—			2.7		2.4			9.1			—			14.2
Deferred income taxes		—			4.6		14.5			—			—			19.1
Deferred costs		—			5.5		—			—			—			5.5

Total current assets		(1.2	)		129.2		41.3			82.2			—			251.5

Notes receivable from affiliates		—			433.2		—			29.1			(462.3	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			50.6		21.3			62.1			—			134.0
Intangible assets, net		—			144.2		7.7			32.2			—			184.1
Goodwill		—			391.1		40.6			27.5			—			459.2
Investment in subsidiaries		637.0			188.2		—			—			(825.2	)		—
Deferred income taxes		—			0.5		15.3			—			—			15.8
Deferred costs		—			1.7		—			—			—			1.7
Other long-term assets		0.5			20.9		0.5			2.6			—			24.5

Total assets	$	636.3		$	1,359.6	$	126.7		$	235.7		$	(1,287.5	)	$	1,070.8

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—		$	51.7	$	6.5		$	27.9			—		$	86.1
Accruals and other current liabilities		—			53.1		3.2			42.6			—			98.9
Current portion of long-term debt		—			8.7		—			—			—			8.7
Short-term borrowings		—			38.5		—			12.5			—			51.0
Income taxes payable		—			6.3		(6.7	)		0.4			—			—
Restructuring accruals		—			—		—			9.7			—			9.7
Deferred revenue		—			32.2		—			0.2			—			32.4

Total current liabilities		—			190.5		3.0			93.3			—			286.8

Notes payable to affiliates		462.3			61.3		(66.8	)		5.5			(462.3	)		—
Long-term debt, less current portion		—			437.5		—			—			—			437.5
Pensions		—			1.3		1.6			51.1			—			54.0
Deferred income taxes		—			61.8		(3.1	)		22.9			—			81.6
Deferred revenue		—			9.9		—			—			—			9.9
Other long-term liabilities		—			11.8		5.4			3.9			—			21.1

Total liabilities		462.3			774.1		(59.9	)	$	176.7			(462.3	)	$	890.9

Stockholders’ equity		174.0			585.5		186.6			59.0			(825.2	)		179.9

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	636.3		$	1,359.6	$	126.7		$	235.7		$	(1,287.5	)	$	1,070.8

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets ~~(unaudited)~~

~~June~~March 3031, 2010

	Parent			Issuer		GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	3.7	$	—		$	27.5		$	—		$	31.2
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		—			59.3		13.5			42.5			—			115.3
(To) from affiliates		(1.1	)		50.5		(2.4	)		(47.0	)		—			—
Other		—			0.3		0.7			—			—			1.0
Inventories, net		—			30.2		11.5			24.6			—			66.3
Prepayments and other current assets		—			4.2		0.4			9.2			—			13.8
Deferred income taxes		—			4.7		1.9			—			—			6.6
Deferred costs		—			6.1		—			—			—			6.1
Total current assets		(1.1	)		159.0		25.6			56.8			—			240.3
Notes receivable from affiliates		—			433.2		—			29.1			(462.3	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			51.5		22.2			58.9			—			132.6
Intangible assets, net		—			144.4		7.7			32.6			—			184.7
Goodwill		—			396.3		40.6			27.5			—			464.4
Investment in subsidiaries		658.9			168.7		—			—			(827.6	)		—
Deferred income taxes		—			0.5		15.9			—			—			16.4
Deferred costs		—			—		—			—			—			—
Other long-term assets		1.5			22.2		0.6			2.1			(1.9	)		24.5
Total assets	$	659.3		$	1,375.8	$	112.6		$	207.0		$	(1,291.8	)	$	1,062.9
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—		$	48.8	$	5.6		$	26.9		$	—		$	81.3
Accruals and other current liabilities		—			57.1		3.4			40.0			—			100.5
Current portion of long-term debt		—			15.7		—			—			—			15.7
Short-term borrowings		—			22.8		—			4.5			—			27.3
Income taxes payable		—			6.9		(5.8	)		0.3			—			1.4
Restructuring accruals		—			—		—			8.6			—			8.6
Deferred revenue		—			11.5		—			0.1			—			11.6
Total current liabilities		—			162.8		3.2			80.4			—			246.4
Notes payable to affiliates		462.3			57.5		(62.5	)		5.0			(462.3	)		—
Long-term debt, less current portion		—			437.9		—			—			—			437.9
Pensions		—			1.3		1.7			45.6			—			48.6
Deferred income taxes		—			64.6		(3.1	)		22.9			—			84.4
Deferred revenue		—			2.3		—			—			—			2.3
Other long-term liabilities		—			32.0		5.3			3.5			—			40.8
Total liabilities		462.3			758.4		(55.4	)		157.4			(462.3	)		860.4
Stockholders’ equity		197.0			617.4		168.0			49.6			(829.5	)		202.5
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	659.3		$	1,375.8	$	112.6		$	207.0		$	(1,291.8	)	$	1,062.9

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer		Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	22.8	$	—		$	36.4		$	—		$	59.2
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		—			62.8		11.4			46.9			—			121.1
(To) from affiliates		(1.1	)		52.8		(2.9	)		(48.8	)		—			—
Other		—			0.2		1.5			0.2			—			1.9
Inventories, net		—			30.5		11.1			25.6			—			67.2
Prepayments and other current assets		—			2.2		1.6			8.4			—			12.2
Deferred income taxes		—			5.0		14.6			—			—			19.6
Deferred costs		—			4.3		—			—			—			4.3

Total current assets		(1.1	)		180.6		37.3			68.7			—			285.5

Notes receivable from affiliates		—			433.2		—			29.1			(462.3	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			48.5		23.5			62.9			—			134.9
Intangible assets, net		—			147.3		7.8			32.9			—			188.0
Goodwill		—			375.2		40.6			27.5			—			443.3
Investment in subsidiaries		638.4			182.1		—			—			(820.5	)		—
Deferred income taxes		—			0.5		15.3			—			—			15.8
Deferred costs		—			1.3		—			—			—			1.3
Other long-term assets		0.4			21.3		0.8			2.6			—			25.1

Total assets	$	637.7		$	1,390.1	$	125.3		$	223.7		$	(1,282.8	)	$	1,093.9

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—		$	81.7	$	6.2		$	29.4		$	—		$	117.3
Accruals and other current liabilities		—			67.7		3.5			43.6			—			114.8
Current portion of long-term debt		—			22.7		—			—			—			22.7
Short-term borrowings		—			—		—			4.9			—			4.9
Income taxes payable		—			7.3		(7.6	)		0.3			—			—
Restructuring accruals		—			0.1		—			12.8			—			12.9
Deferred revenue		—			34.1		—			0.2			—			34.3

Total current liabilities		—			213.6		2.1			91.2			—			306.9

Notes payable to affiliates		462.3			54.9		(60.9	)		6.0			(462.3	)		—
Long-term debt, less current portion		—			438.3		—			—			—			438.3
Pensions		—			1.3		1.6			50.2			—			53.1
Deferred income taxes		—			61.8		(3.0	)		22.9			—			81.7
Deferred revenue		—			4.8		—			—			—			4.8
Other long-term liabilities		—			19.0		5.3			4.3			—			28.6

Total liabilities		462.3			793.7		(54.9	)		174.6			(462.3	)		913.4
Stockholders’ equity		175.4			596.3		180.2			49.1			(820.5	)		180.5

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	637.7		$	1,390.0	$	125.3		$	223.7		$	(1,282.8	)	$	1,093.9

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating ~~Balance~~Statements ~~Sheets~~of Operations (unaudited)

~~March~~Fiscal Quarter Ended September 3130, 2010

	Parent			Issuer		GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	22.8	$	—		$	36.4		$	—		$	59.2
Accounts receivable:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts		—			64.1		11.4			46.9			—			122.4
(To) from affiliates		(1.1	)		52.8		(2.9	)		(48.8	)		—			—
Other		—			0.2		1.5			0.2			—			1.9
Inventories, net		—			30.3		11.1			25.6			—			67.0
Prepayments and other current assets		—			3.9		0.6			8.4			—			12.9
Deferred income taxes		—			5.0		1.9			—			—			6.9
Deferred costs		—			5.1		—			—			—			5.1
Total current assets		(1.1	)		184.2		23.6			68.7			—			275.4
Notes receivable from affiliates		—			433.2		—			29.1			(462.3	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			49.9		23.5			62.9			—			136.3
Intangible assets, net		—			147.3		7.8			32.9			—			188.0
Goodwill		—			385.7		40.6			27.5			—			453.8
Investment in subsidiaries		658.8			168.8		—			—			(827.6	)		—
Deferred income taxes		—			0.5		15.9			—			—			16.4
Other long-term assets		0.4			21.3		0.8			2.6			—			25.1
Total assets	$	658.1		$	1,390.9	$	112.2		$	223.7		$	(1,289.9	)	$	1,095.0
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	—		$	79.9	$	6.2		$	29.4		$	—		$	115.5
Accruals and other current liabilities		—			68.6		3.5			43.6			—			115.7
Current portion of long-term debt		—			22.7		—			—			—			22.7
Short-term borrowings		—			—		—			4.9			—			4.9
Income taxes payable		—			7.3		(7.3	)		0.3			—			0.3
Restructuring accruals		—			0.1		—			12.8			—			12.9
Deferred revenue		—			11.4		—			0.2			—			11.6
Total current liabilities		—			190.0		2.4			91.2			—			283.6
Notes payable to affiliates		462.3			54.9		(60.9	)		6.0			(462.3	)		—
Long-term debt, less current portion		—			438.3		—			—			—			438.3
Pensions		—			1.3		1.6			50.2			—			53.1
Deferred income taxes		—			64.7		(3.1	)		22.9			—			84.5
Deferred revenue		—			2.4		—			—			—			2.4
Other long-term liabilities		—			22.6		5.3			4.3			—			32.2
Total liabilities		462.3			774.2		(54.7	)		174.6			(462.3	)		894.1
Stockholders’ equity		195.8			616.7		166.9			49.1			(827.6	)		200.9
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	658.1		$	1,390.9	$	112.2		$	223.7		$	(1,289.9	)	$	1,095.0

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	107.4		$	26.1		$	73.5		$	(3.8	)	$	203.2
Cost of sales		—			83.2			20.4			46.1			(3.8	)		145.9

Gross profit		—			24.2			5.7			27.4			—			57.3

Selling, general and administrative expenses		—			27.6			2.1			14.7			—			44.4
Restructuring costs		—			—			—			1.9			—			1.9
Amortization of intangible assets		—			3.0			—			0.4			—			3.4
Other operating expense (income), net		—			1.0			—			(0.3	)		—			0.7

Operating (loss) income		—			(7.4	)		3.6			10.7			—			6.9

Non-operating (expense) income:
Interest (expense) income, net		—			(10.3	)		0.1			(0.9	)		—			(11.1	)
Equity in (loss) earnings of subsidiaries		(4.3	)		5.1			—			—			(0.8	)		—
Other expense, net		—			—			—			(0.8	)		—			(0.8	)

(Loss) income before income taxes		(4.3	)		(12.6	)		3.7			9.0			(0.8	)		(5.0	)

(Benefit) provision for income taxes		—			—			(1.9	)		0.9			—			(1.0	)

Consolidated net (loss) income		(4.3	)		(12.6	)		5.6			8.1			(0.8	)		(4.0	)

Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			(0.3	)		—			(0.3	)

Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest.	$	(4.3	)	$	(12.6	)	$	5.6		$	7.8		$	(0.8	)		(4.3	)

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations (unaudited)

~~Fiscal~~Six ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

	Parent		Issuer			GuarantorSubsidiaries		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Net sales	$	—	$	137.4		$	25.6	$	66.8		$	(4.0	)	$	225.8
Cost of sales		—		97.4			20.5		48.2			(4.0	)		162.1
Gross profit		—		40.0			5.1		18.6			—			63.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses		—		26.2			2.2		14.3			—			42.7
Restructuring costs		—		—			—		1.0			—			1.0
Amortization of intangible assets		—		2.8			0.1		0.4			—			3.3
Other operating expense, net		—		1.0			—		—			—			1.0
Operating income		—		10.0			2.8		2.9			—			15.7
Non-operating (expense) income:
Interest (expense) income, net		—		(10.5	)		0.1		(0.9	)		—			(11.3	)
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries		1.7		0.9			—		—			(2.6	)		—
Other income, net		—		—			—		0.3			—			0.3
Income (loss) before income taxes		1.7		0.4			2.9		2.3			(2.6	)		4.7
Provision for income taxes		—		—			1.8		0.7			—			2.5
Consolidated net income (loss)		1.7		0.4			1.1		1.6			(2.6	)		2.2
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—		—			—		(0.5	)		—			(0.5	)
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest.	$	1.7	$	0.4		$	1.1	$	1.1		$	(2.6	)	$	1.7

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	243.8		$	51.7	$	140.3		$	(7.8	)	$	428.0
Cost of sales		—			180.1			40.9		94.3			(7.8	)		307.5

Gross profit		—			63.7			10.8		46.0			—			120.5

Selling, general and administrative expenses		—			52.9			4.3		29.0			—			86.2
Restructuring costs		—			—			—		2.9			—			2.9
Amortization of intangible assets		—			5.8			0.1		0.8			—			6.7
Other operating expense (income), net		—			2.0			—		(0.3	)		—			1.7

Operating income		—			3.0			6.4		13.6			—			23.0

Non-operating (expense) income:
Interest (expense) income, net		—			(20.8	)		0.2		(1.8	)		—			(22.4	)
Equity in (loss) earnings of subsidiaries		(2.3	)		5.9			—		—			(3.6	)		—
Other expense, net		—			—			—		(0.5	)		—			(0.5	)

(Loss) income before income taxes		(2.3	)		(11.9	)		6.6		11.3			(3.6	)		0.1

Provision for income taxes		—			—			—		1.6			—			1.6

Consolidated net (loss) income		(2.3	)		(11.9	)		6.6		9.7			(3.6	)		(1.5	)

Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—		(0.8	)		—			(0.8	)

Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest.	$	(2.3	)	$	(11.9	)	$	6.6	$	8.9		$	(3.6	)	$	(2.3	)

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations (unaudited)

Fiscal Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2009

	Parent			Issuer			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Net sales	$	—		$	120.5		$	22.1		$	61.9		$	(4.2	)	$	200.3
Cost of sales		—			87.8			17.1			45.1			(4.2	)		145.8
Gross profit		—			32.7			5.0			16.8			—			54.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses		—			19.3			2.1			13.9			—			35.3
Restructuring costs		—			0.2			—			6.6			—			6.8
Amortization of intangible assets		—			2.4			—			0.4			—			2.8
Other operating expense, net		—			0.8			—			—			—			0.8
Operating income (loss)		—			10.0			2.9			(4.1	)		—			8.8
Non-operating (expense) income:
Interest (expense) income, net		—			(8.3	)		0.1			(0.8	)		—			(9.0	)
Equity in (loss) earnings of subsidiaries		(0.6	)		3.3			—			—			(2.7	)		—
Other (loss) income, net		—			(0.1	)		—			1.6			—			1.5
(Loss) income before income taxes		(0.6	)		4.9			3.0			(3.3	)		(2.7	)		1.3
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		—			0.8			(0.5	)		0.7			—			1.0
Consolidated net (loss) income		(0.6	)		4.1			3.5			(4.0	)		(2.7	)		0.3
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			(0.8	)		—			(0.8	)
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest.	$	(0.6	)	$	4.1		$	3.5		$	(4.8	)	$	(2.7	)	$	(0.5	)

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales		—		$	115.7		$	27.0		$	65.4		$	(4.1	)	$	204.0
Cost of sales		—			85.1			22.0			47.6			(4.1	)		150.6

Gross profit		—			30.6			5.0			17.8			—			53.4

Selling, general and administrative expenses		—			20.0			2.2			14.4			—			36.6
Restructuring costs		—			0.2			—			2.8			—			3.0
Amortization of intangible assets		—			2.5			0.1			0.4			—			3.0
Loss or debt extinguishment		—			5.9			—			—			—			5.9
Other operating expense, net		—			1.7			—			—			—			1.7

Operating income		—			0.3			2.7			0.2			—			3.2

Non-operating (expense) income:
Interest (expense) income, net		—			(11.0	)		0.1			(0.8	)		—			(11.7	)
Equity in (loss) earnings of subsidiaries		(6.6	)		5.9			—			—			0.7			—
Other income (expense), net		—			0.1			—			(0.3	)		—			(0.2	)

(Loss) income before income taxes		(6.6	)		(4.7	)		2.8			(0.9	)		0.7			(8.7	)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes		—			0.4			(3.4	)		0.5			—			(2.5	)

Consolidated net (loss) income		(6.6	)		(5.1	)		6.2			(1.4	)		0.7			(6.2	)

Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			(0.6	)		—			(0.6	)

Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest.	$	(6.6	)	$	(5.1	)	$	6.2		$	(2.0	)	$	0.7		$	(6.8	)

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of ~~Cash~~Operations ~~Flows~~ (unaudited)

~~Fiscal~~Six ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~2009

	Parent			Issuer			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Operating activities
Consolidated net income (loss)	$	1.7		$	0.4		$	1.1		$	1.6		$	(2.6	)	$	2.2
Non-cash adjustments		—			7.8			1.8			2.9			—			12.5
Undistributed equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries		(1.7	)		(0.9	)		—			—			2.6			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		—			(36.1	)		(2.5	)		(10.2	)		—			(48.8	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		—			(28.8	)		0.4			(5.7	)		—			(34.1	)
Investing activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment and software development costs		—			(5.7	)		(0.4	)		(2.1	)		—			(8.2	)
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(5.7	)		(0.4	)		(2.1	)		—			(8.2	)
Financing activities
Increase in short-term borrowings		—			22.8			—			(0.4	)		—			22.4
Principal payments on debt		—			(7.4	)		—			—			—			(7.4	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		—			15.4			—			(0.4	)		—			15.0
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			—			(0.7	)		—			(0.7	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		—			(19.1	)		—			(8.9	)		—			(28.0	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	$	—		$	22.8		$	—		$	36.4		$	—		$	59.2
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	3.7		$	—		$	27.5		$	—		$	31.2

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	231.3		$	49.1		$	127.3		$	(8.3	)	$	399.4
Cost of sales		—			172.7			39.1			92.7			(8.3	)		296.2

Gross profit		—			58.6			10.0			34.6			—			103.2

Selling, general and administrative expenses		—			39.4			4.3			28.3			—			72.0
Restructuring costs		—			0.4			—			9.4			—			9.8
Amortization of intangible assets		—			4.9			0.1			0.8			—			5.8
Loss or debt extinguishment		—			5.9			—			—			—			5.9
Other operating expense, net		—			2.5			—			—			—			2.5

Operating income (loss)		—			5.5			5.6			(3.9	)		—			7.2

Non-operating (expense) income:
Interest (expense) income, net		—			(19.3	)		0.2			(1.6	)		—			(20.7	)
Equity in (loss) earnings of subsidiaries		(10.2	)		11.0			—			—			(0.8	)		—
Other income, net		—			—			—			1.3			—			1.3

(Loss) income before income taxes		(10.2	)		(2.8	)		5.8			(4.2	)		(0.8	)		(12.2	)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes		—			1.2			(5.7	)		1.2			—			(3.3	)

Consolidated net (loss) income		(10.2	)		(4.0	)		11.5			(5.4	)		(0.8	)		(8.9	)

Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			(1.4	)		—			(1.4	)

Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest.	$	(10.2	)	$	(4.0	)	$	11.5		$	(6.8	)	$	(0.8	)	$	(10.3	)

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

~~Fiscal~~Six ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~June~~September 2730, ~~2009~~2010

	Parent			Issuer			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in millions)
Operating activities
Consolidated net (loss) income	$	(0.6	)	$	4.1		$	3.5		$	(4.0	)	$	(2.7	)	$	0.3
Non-cash adjustments		—			7.1			1.3			3.1			—			11.5
Undistributed equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries		0.6			(3.3	)		—			—			2.7			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		—			(8.4	)		(4.0	)		(1.2	)		—			(13.6	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		—			(0.5	)		0.8			(2.1	)		—			(1.8	)
Investing activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment and software development costs		—			(6.6	)		(0.4	)		(1.8	)		—			(8.8	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			—			0.6			—			0.6
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			(7.1	)		0.4			(3.3	)		—			(10.0	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	$	—		$	14.1		$	—		$	23.8		$	—		$	37.9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	7.0		$	0.4		$	20.5		$	—		$	27.9

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating activities
Consolidated net (loss) income	$	(2.3	)	$	(11.9	)	$	6.6		$	9.7		$	(3.6	)	$	(1.5	)
Non-cash adjustments		—			16.0			3.2			6.3			—			25.5
Undistributed equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries		2.3			(5.9	)		—			—			3.6			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		—			10.7			(8.5	)		(27.5	)		—			(25.3	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		—			8.9			1.3			(11.5	)		—			(1.3	)

Investing activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment and software development costs		—		$	(13.9	)		(0.9	)		(3.6	)		—			(18.4	)
Acquisitions		—			(29.6	)		—			—			—			(29.6	)

Net cash used in investing activities		—			(43.5	)		(0.9	)		(3.6	)		—			(48.0	)

Financing activities
Increase in short-term borrowings		—			38.5			—			7.5			—			46.0
Principal payments on debt		—			(14.8	)		—			—			—			(14.8	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		—			23.7			—			7.5			—			31.2

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			—			(0.2	)		—			(0.2	)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			(10.9	)		0.4			(7.8	)		—			(18.3	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	$	—		$	22.8		$	—		$	36.4		$	—		$	59.2

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	11.9		$	0.4		$	28.6		$	—		$	40.9

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

Six Months Ended September 30, 2009

(in millions)


	Parent			Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating activities
Consolidated net (loss) income	$	(10.2	)	$	(4.0	)	$	11.5		$	(5.4	)	$	(0.8	)	$	(8.9	)
Non-cash adjustments		—			20.5			(5.8	)		5.6			—			20.3
Undistributed equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries		10.2			(11.0	)		—			—			0.8			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		—			(2.4	)		(4.2	)		13.4			—			6.8

Net cash provided by operating activities		—			3.1			1.5			13.6			—			18.2

Investing activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment and software development costs		—			(17.2	)		(1.4	)		(4.1	)		—			(22.7	)
Acquisitions		—			(20.2	)		—			—			—			(20.2	)

Net cash used in investing activities		—			(37.4	)		(1.4	)		(4.1	)		—			(42.9	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from debt issuance		—			35.0			—			—			—			35.0
Debt issuance costs		—			(8.8	)		—			—			—			(8.8	)
Purchase of noncontrolling equity interest		—			—			—			(6.0	)		—			(6.0	)
Principal payments on debt		—			(0.4	)		—			—			—			(0.4	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		—			25.8			—			(6.0	)		—			19.8
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			—			1.0			—			1.0

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		—			(8.5	)		0.1			4.5			—			(3.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	$	—		$	14.1		$	—		$	23.8		$	—		$	37.9

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	5.6		$	0.1		$	28.3		$	—		$	34.0

16. Subsequent Event

On December 17, 2010, Sensus (Bermuda 1), Ltd. made a capital contribution of $35 million to the Company to (I) finance the final payment of $12.8 million for the acquisition of the remaining 40% non controlling interest held by Yangzhou Runlin Investment Co., Ltd. in our Chinese joint venture, and (II) pay down approximately $22 million of our revolving credit facilities to provide additional capacity for letters of credit to support growth requirements and to increase our availability thereunder.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions as they relate to us are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. All statements by us regarding our expected financial position, sales, cash flow and other operating results, business strategy, financing plans, forecasted trends related to the markets in which we operate, legal proceedings and similar matters, other than those of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Our expectations expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements may turn out to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations because of various risks. These risks include any future restatements of our consolidated financial statements, our inability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, our susceptibility to macroeconomic downturns in the United States and abroad, conditions in the residential, commercial and industrial construction markets and in the automotive industry, our dependence on new product development and intellectual property, and our dependence on independent distributors and third-party contract manufacturers, automotive vehicle production levels and schedules, our substantial financial leverage, debt service and other cash requirements, liquidity constraints and risks related to future growth and expansion. Other important risk factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those contained or implied in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, our ability to integrate acquired companies, general economic and business conditions, competition, adverse changes in the regulatory or legislative environment in which we operate, customer cancellations and other factors beyond our control.

Effective April 1, 2010, we elected to change our quarterly reporting period to be based on the calendar quarter end. Prior to April 1, 2010, we operated on a 13-week financial and business closing schedule for all periods, except year end, which ~~was~~is March 31, and the fiscal half year, which ~~was~~is September 30. The three-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 includes three ~~more~~fewer days than the 13-week period of the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year as a result of transitioning to the new reporting period. The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and the related notes thereto included in this report and the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010 and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on December 17, 2010.

Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, the use in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the terms “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refers to Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless we indicate otherwise, we have rounded dollar amounts to the nearest hundred thousand dollars.

Restatement

On December 17, 2010, we restated our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, in each case in connection with our previously announced internal review of our revenue recognition practices and other accounting matters. We filed these restated consolidated financial statements with the SEC on December 17, 2010 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation incorporates restated financial data contained in such financial statements.

General

We are a leading provider of advanced utility infrastructure systems, metering product technologies and related communication systems to the worldwide utility industry. We have over a century of experience in providing support to utilities. Our technologies, products and systems enable our utility customers to measure, manage and control electricity, water and natural gas more efficiently thereby enhancing conservation of those ~~limited resources. Our products and technologies provide key functionality that will be required for the development of the “Smart Grid” in the United States. We are a leading provider of~~ AMI fixed network radio frequency systems and solutions with a wide range of product offerings to meet the evolving demands of the electric, water, and gas utility sectors. We believe that we are the fastest growing participant in the North American electric metering systems market and the largest global manufacturer of water meters, a leading supplier of AMR devices to the North American water utilities market and a leading global developer and manufacturer of gas and heat metering systems. We are recognized throughout the utility industry for developing and manufacturing metering products with long-term accuracy and robust product features, innovative metering communications systems, as well as for providing comprehensive customer service for all of our products and services. In addition to our advanced utility infrastructure and metering business, we believe that we are the leading North American producer of pipe joining and repair products for water and natural gas utilities and we are a premier supplier of precision-manufactured, thin-wall, low-porosity aluminum die castings.

3132

limited resources. Our products and technologies provide key functionality that will be required for the development of the “Smart Grid” in the United States. We are a leading provider of AMI fixed network radio frequency systems and solutions with a wide range of product offerings to meet the evolving demands of the electric, water, and gas utility sectors. We believe that we are the fastest growing participant in the North American electric metering systems market and the largest global manufacturer of water meters, a leading supplier of AMR devices to the North American water utilities market and a leading global developer and manufacturer of gas and heat metering systems. We are recognized throughout the utility industry for developing and manufacturing metering products with long-term accuracy and robust product features, innovative metering communications systems, as well as for providing comprehensive customer service for all of our products and services. In addition to our advanced utility infrastructure and metering business, we believe that we are the leading North American producer of pipe joining and repair products for water and natural gas utilities and we are a premier supplier of precision-manufactured, thin-wall, low-porosity aluminum die castings.

Acquisitions

Rongtai. On July 27, 2005, the Company formed a joint venture, PDC Rongtai, in China for its Sensus Precision Die Casting business with Yangzhou Runlin Investment Co., Ltd. On September 29, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of the 40% noncontrolling interest held by Yangzhou Runlin Investment Co., Ltd. As a result of the acquisition and in accordance with the terms of the equity transfer agreement, PDC Rongtai became wholly owned by a subsidiary of the Company and was subsequently renamed Sensus Precision Die Casting (Yangzhou) Co., Ltd. The terms of the agreement provide for the payment of total consideration with an estimated fair value of $18.8 million. In conjunction with the equity transfer agreement, the Company entered into a real estate transfer contract with Yangzhou Rongtai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (“Yangzhou”) to sell certain buildings, ancillary equipment and land-use rights to Yangzhou for approximately $2.0 million. See Note 2 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

Telemetric. On June 30, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Telemetric for approximately $11.7 million, including $6.8 million in cash at closing and $1.0 million payable within approximately one year of the closing date of the related asset purchase agreement, of which $0.37 million was paid to Telemetric in fiscal 2010 and $0.3 million in fiscal 2011. Additional cash consideration may become payable based on the performance of the acquired business through June 2013. Acquisition-date fair value for this contingent consideration is estimated at $3.9 million. Payments on an undiscounted basis are projected to be $5.8 million and are subject to a $12 million cap. ~~The~~A payment of $1 million for the contingent consideration was made in fiscal 2011. The Company financed the transaction primarily with cash on hand and borrowings under its senior credit facilities. Telemetric provides utilities with distribution automation systems that use commercial cellular networks and PowerVistaTM , a web-based software application. This acquisition provides the Company with a significant and established presence in the distribution automation portion of the utility landscape and augments the Company’s AMI and Smart Grid solutions. See Note 2 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

AMDS. On July 6, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of AMDS for $62.6 million consisting of $49.8 million in cash and 15,000 vested preference shares issued by our parent, Sensus 1. The Company financed the transaction with equity contributions totaling $30.4 million in cash from Sensus 1, cash on hand and utilization of the Company’s revolving credit facility. As discussed below, the vested preference shares were subject to mandatory redemption by Sensus 1 for $15 million at the option of the holder once certain future financial performance targets were achieved.

~~The~~33 Company is also required to make additional future cash payments to AMDS based on certain financial performance measures of the acquired business through March 2011. Related to the performance of the acquired business, the Company accrued $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and $56.1 million cumulatively, net of $18.9 million previously paid in accordance with the purchase agreement ($0.9 million in fiscal 2008, $4.6 million in fiscal 2009 and $13.4 million in fiscal 2010). In the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, $28.3 million is classified as accruals and other current liabilities and $27.8 million is classified as other long-term liabilities. These gross accrued amounts reflect additional purchase price and are recorded as goodwill.

~~vested~~The ~~preference~~Company ~~shares~~is ~~were~~required ~~released~~to ~~from~~make ~~restrictions,~~additional ~~and~~future incash ~~fiscal~~payments ~~2010,~~to AMDS ~~opted~~based on certain financial performance measures of the acquired business through March 2011. Related to ~~have~~the performance of the 15acquired business,~~000~~ ~~unrestricted~~the ~~shares~~Company ~~redeemed~~accrued $15.8 million for ~~cash~~the six months ended September 30, 2010 and $25.6 Asmillion ~~required~~cumulatively, bynet of ~~the~~$47.2 ~~AMDS~~million paid in accordance with the purchase agreement ($0.9 million in fiscal 2008, ~~the~~ $154.6 million ~~was~~in ~~funded~~fiscal by2009, ~~Sensus~~$13.4 1million in fiscal 2010, and ~~thus~~$28.3 million in fiscal 2011). In the ~~Company’s~~accompanying ~~cash~~consolidated ~~position~~balance ~~was~~sheet ~~not~~as ~~impacted~~of September 30, 2010, $17.6 million is classified as accruals and other current liabilities and $8.0 million is classified as other long-term liabilities. The offset to these accrued amounts reflects additional purchase price and is classified as goodwill.

In addition, on the date of acquisition, Sensus 1 issued 15,000 unvested preference shares to AMDS, which were subject to vesting based on the performance of the acquired business over a five-year period following closing. The redemption value of the unvested preference shares was $15 million if the specified performance thresholds were achieved over the relevant period. During fiscal 2010, the performance thresholds were achieved related to the unvested preference shares, and all of these preference shares became vested. Accordingly, 15,000 vested preference shares were released from restrictions, and in fiscal 2010, AMDS opted to have the 15,000 unrestricted shares redeemed for cash. As required by the AMDS purchase agreement, the $15 million was funded by Sensus 1 in fiscal 2010, and thus the Company’s cash position was not impacted.

Other Information about Our Business

The following table presents, as of the dates indicated, additional information about our operations and business:

Fiscal Quarter Ended

June 30,2010

March 31,2010

December 29,2009

September 30,2009

June 27,2009

March 31,2009

September 30,2010

June 30,2010

March 31,2010

December 29,2009

September 30,2009

June 27,2009

Total net sales (in millions)

~~225~~203.82

~~260.4~~$

224.8

~~195.6~~

$256.3

~~209.3~~

~~200~~188.37

~~207.0~~$

204.0

195.4

Employees

3,~~776~~787

~~3,838~~

3,776

~~3,642~~

3,838

~~3,707~~

3,~~671~~642

~~3,838~~

3,707

3,671

For Backlog, Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources, all dollar amounts and variances in the narrative discussions are rounded to millions; however, percentages are calculated based on dollar amounts depicted in the tables.

Backlog

The Company’s total backlog consists of unshipped orders relating to undelivered contractual commitments and purchase orders. Total backlog at ~~June~~each of September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $~~107~~106 million. Total backlog at September 30, ~~compared~~2010 ~~with~~and 2009 included $~~106~~2 million and $1 million of unfavorable currency effects, respectively. Eliminating the currency impacts, total backlog at ~~June~~September 2730, ~~2009~~2010 would have been $108 million representing a $1 million increase compared with the end of the prior corresponding fiscal quarter. In addition, at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company cumulatively had approximately 11 million AMI electric and gas endpoints under long-term contracts, of which approximately ~~6.3~~7 million endpoints had been shipped. The potential aggregate future revenue of unshipped endpoints and services under these contracts was approximately $~~517~~502 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, of which approximately $27 million is included in backlog. No assurance can be made that firm purchase orders will be placed under these contracts.

~~For~~34 Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources, all dollar amounts and variances in the narrative discussions are rounded to millions; however, percentages are calculated based on dollar amounts depicted in the tables.

Results of Operations

The following table provides summary results of operations of the Company for the periods presented:

(dollars in millions)	Fiscal ~~QuarterEndedJune~~QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2010			%			~~Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009~~	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2009			%	%			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2010			%			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2009			%
Net sales	$	~~225~~203.82		~~100~~	%100	%	$	~~200.3~~$	204.0		~~100~~	%	100	%	$	428.0			100	%	$	399.4			100	%
Gross profit		6357.73		28	%28	%		~~54.5~~	53.4		27	%	26	%		120.5			28	%		103.2			26	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4244.74		19	%22	%		~~35.3~~	36.6		18	%	18	%		86.2			20	%		72.0			18	%
Restructuring costs		1.09		—	1	%		~~6.8~~	3.0		3	%	1	%		2.9			1	%		9.8			3	%
Amortization of intangible assets		3.34		2	%2	%		~~2.8~~	3.0		1	%	1	%		6.7			2	%		5.8			1	%
Other operating expense, net		1.0		—				0.8			—
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			—				5.9				3	%		—			—			5.9			1	%
Operating income		15.7		7	%			8.8			5	%
Other operating expense, net		0.7			—				1.7				1	%		1.7			—			2.5			1	%
Interest expense, net		(11.3	)	(5	)%			(9.0	)		(5	)%
Operating income		6.9			3	%			3.2				2	%		23.0			5	%		7.2			2	%
Other income, net		0.3		—				1.5			1	%
Interest expense, net		(11.1	)		(5	)%			(11.7	)			(6	)%		(22.4	)		(5	)%		(20.7	)		(5	)%
Income before income taxes		4.7		2	%			1.3			1	%
Other (expense) income, net		(0.8	)		—				(0.2	)			—			(0.5	)		—			1.3			—
Provision for income taxes		2.5		1	%			1.0			1	%
(Loss) income before income taxes		(5.0	)		(2	)%			(8.7	)			(4	)%		0.1			—			(12.2	)		(3	)%
Consolidated net income		2.2		1	%			0.3			—
(Benefit) provision for income taxes		(1.0	)		—				(2.5	)			(1	)%		1.6			—			(3.3	)		(1	)%
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(0.5	)	—				(0.8	)		(1	)%
Consolidated net loss		(4.0	)		(2	)%			(6.2	)			(3	)%		(1.5	)		—			(8.9	)		(2	)%
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	1.7		1	%		$	(0.5	)		(1	)%
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(0.3	)		—				(0.6	)			—			(0.8	)		—			(1.4	)		—
Net loss attributable to controlling interest	$	(4.3	)		(2	)%		$	(6.8	)			(3	)%	$	(2.3	)		—		$	(10.3	)		(2	)%

33Fiscal Quarter and Six Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared with Fiscal Quarter and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009

Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 Compared with Fiscal Quarter Ended June 27, 2009

Net Sales.

(dollars in millions)	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010		Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009			DollarChange			PercentChange
(dollarsin millions)	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2009				DollarChange			PercentChange		Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2010		Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2009		DollarChange		PercentChange
Net sales	$	~~225~~203.82	$	~~200.3~~$	204.0	$	~~25.5~~	$	13(0.8	%)		—	$	428.0	$	399.4	$	28.6		7	%

Net sales for the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~increased~~decreased ~~$26~~slightly ~~million or 13%~~ compared to the prior corresponding fiscal quarter due to ~~increased~~the ~~demand~~timing ~~for~~of ~~FlexNet~~major ~~systems~~smart ~~and~~grid ~~SmartPoint~~implementation ~~products~~milestones toon ~~support~~large ~~electric,~~contracts. ~~gas~~This ~~and~~was ~~water~~partially ~~customers~~offset asby ~~they~~a combination of increased ~~continued~~sales toon ~~roll~~our ~~out~~core ~~their~~metrology ~~smart~~products ~~grid~~and ~~implementations~~revenue from the license of water metering technology for $8 million. Net sales outside North America were favorably impacted primarily by improving market conditions compared to the prior corresponding fiscal quarter and six-month period.

~~Our~~For ~~top~~the ~~ten~~six ~~customers~~months ~~accounted~~ended ~~for~~September 30, ~~approximately~~2010, ~~39% of~~ net sales ~~for~~were higher than the ~~fiscal~~prior corresponding ~~quarter~~period ~~ended~~due ~~June 30,~~to ~~2010,~~improving market conditions for our core metrology businesses and norevenue ~~individual customer~~from ~~accounted~~the license for ~~more~~water ~~than~~metering ~~10%~~technology ofreferenced ~~net sales~~above.

Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 33% of net sales for the six months ended September 30, 2010, and no individual customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales.

Gross Profit.

(dollars in millions)	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009			DollarChange		PercentChange
(dollarsin millions)	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2009			DollarChange			PercentChange			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2009			DollarChange		PercentChange
Gross profit	$	6357.73		$	5453.54		$	93.29	17	%	7	%	$	120.5		$	103.2		$	17.3		17	%
Gross profit as a percent of net sales		28	%		2726	%		—	4	%	8	%		28	%		26	%		—		8	%

Gross profit in dollars and as a ~~percentage~~percent of net sales ~~improved~~for the current fiscal quarter increased from the prior corresponding fiscal quarter principally due to the ~~increased~~license ~~demand~~revenue described above, partially offset by the timing of major smart grid implementation milestones on large contracts. ~~Product~~Gross ~~volumes,~~profit ~~mix~~in dollars and as a percent of net sales improved ~~operating~~for ~~scale~~the ~~and~~six-month ~~efficiency~~period ~~contributed~~ended September 30, 2010 compared to the prior corresponding fiscal period due to improved product volume, product mix, operating scale, ~~improvements~~efficiency gains and the aforementioned license revenue.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses.

(dollars in millions)	Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedJune 27, 2009			DollarChange		PercentChange
(dollarsin millions)	Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2010			Fiscal QuarterEndedSeptember 30, 2009			DollarChange			PercentChange			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2010			Six MonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2009			DollarChange		PercentChange
SG&A expenses	$	4244.74		$	3536.36		$	7.48	21	%	21	%	$	86.2		$	72.0		$	14.2		20	%
SG&A expenses as a percent of net sales		1922	%		18	%		—	6	%	22	%		20	%		18	%		—		11	%

SG&A expenses for the fiscal quarter and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 were higher than the prior corresponding fiscal ~~quarter~~periods as the Company’s cost structure reflects increased investment for research and development and infrastructure to support ~~marketing~~ marketing strategies and customer obligations. In addition, the Company’s legal fees increased from the corresponding periods due to legal defense associated with intellectual property matters.

Restructuring Costs. Restructuring costs for the fiscal ~~quarters~~quarter and six months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 were $2 million and $3 ~~June 27~~million, ~~2009~~respectively, ~~were~~and $13 million and $710 million for the prior corresponding periods, respectively,. ~~and~~Restructuring costs primarily were due to the restructuring alignment activities associated with our manufacturing operations ~~in Germany~~.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization expense relates primarily to the intangible assets consisting of non-competition agreements, customer relationships and other intangible assets recorded at the time of the acquisition of Invensys Metering Systems and the intangible assets consisting of developed technology recorded as a result of the AMDS acquisition. Amortization of intangible assets for the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was comparable to the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2009 at $3 million and increased to $7 million for the current six-month period from $6 million for the prior corresponding six-month period due to the change in one of the tradenames from indefinite-lived to definite-lived.

Other Operating Expense, Net. Other operating expense, net of $1 million for the ~~current~~ fiscal quarter and ~~prior~~six ~~corresponding~~months ended ~~fiscal~~September 30, ~~quarter~~2010 primarily consisted of recurring management fees for The Jordan Company, L.P. In the fiscal quarter and six months ended September 30, 2009, the Company also recorded approximately $1 million of acquisition costs related to the Telemetric acquisition, the purchase of the PDC Rongtai noncontrolling interest and an unconsummated acquisition.

34Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net decreased approximately $1 million for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the prior corresponding period. The decrease resulted from a change in the

~~Interest~~ type ~~Expense~~of debt held, ~~Net.~~as the Company’s term debt has been paid down, interest rate swaps have expired and short-term borrowings have increased compared to the prior corresponding quarter. Interest expense, net increased approximately $2 million for the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to the prior corresponding ~~fiscal~~period ~~quarter~~ and reflects the increase in interest rates related to the amendment to our senior credit facilities in July 2009 and an increase in the average outstanding balance of the Company’s term debt, partially offset by the expiration of interest rate swaps.

Other (Expense) Income, Net. Other ~~income~~expense, net was less than $1 million for the ~~current~~ fiscal quarter and six months ended September 30, 2010. Other (expense) income, net was ~~approximately~~less than $2(1) million and $1 million for the prior corresponding ~~fiscal quarter~~periods. Other (expense) income, net principally relates to net transactional foreign currency gains and losses.

(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax ~~provision~~benefit was ~~approximately~~ $31 million and $12 million for the fiscal quarters ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and ~~June 27,~~ 2009, respectively. Income tax provision was approximately $2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2010 and income tax benefit was $3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and reflects the Company’s pre-tax (loss) income based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate.

Consolidated Net ( Loss) Income. Consolidated net ~~income~~loss of $24 million decreased $2 million for the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~increased~~compared to the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009. Consolidated net loss of $2 million for the fiscal six months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $7 million compared to the fiscal ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2009, as a result of the factors described above.

Net Income ~~Attributable~~ Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest. Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest relates to the Company’s partner’s share of income or loss from our joint venture entities. The Company holds joint venture interests in entities in the Ukraine (51%), Algeria (55%) and China (55%). On September 29, 2009, the Company purchased the noncontrolling interest of PDC Rongtai. See Note 2 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest decreased slightly for the current fiscal quarter and six-month period as compared to the prior corresponding ~~fiscal~~periods ~~quarter~~ primarily due to the impact of the purchase of PDC Rongtai described above, partially offset by the net improved results of operations of our remaining joint ventures.

Net ~~Income (~~ Loss) Attributable to Controlling Interest. Net ~~income~~loss attributable to controlling interest of $4 million and $2 million for the fiscal quarter and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~increased~~respectively, decreased $23 million ~~compared~~and $8 million compared to the fiscal quarter and six months ended ~~June~~September 2730, 2009, respectively, as a result of the factors described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we funded our operating, investing and financing requirements through cash on hand and ~~short~~ short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facilities.

Net cash flow (used in) provided by operating activities in the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarters~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and ~~June 27,~~ 2009 was $34(1) million and $218 million, respectively. The $3219 million decrease in the current ~~fiscal~~six-month ~~quarter~~period compared to the prior corresponding ~~fiscal~~six-month period ~~quarter~~ was primarily driven by payments of accrued expenses and accounts payable, partially offset by decreased accounts receivable as a result of improved collections.

Cash expenditures for restructuring for the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarters~~months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and ~~June 27,~~ 2009 were $46 million and $68 million, respectively, and were reflected within cash used in operations. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, we had $1113 million of restructuring accruals reflected on our consolidated balance sheet within current liabilities and other long-term liabilities. Additional cash restructuring expenses of approximately $113 million are expected to be incurred in fiscal 2011.

~~Cash~~37 used in investing activities were $8 million and $9 million for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009, respectively. For the current and prior corresponding fiscal quarters expenditures for property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) were $7 million, of which 31% and 51%, respectively, reflected investment in the AMI business. PP&E expenditures were comprised of equipment, molds and tooling for replacement and cost efficiency, and maintenance, safety and expansion that extend useful lives. We incurred software development costs related to the AMI business of $1 million and $2 million, for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009, respectively. For the remainder of fiscal 2011, we expect to make expenditures for PP&E, software development costs and intangible assets of approximately $40 million, reflecting our continuing emphasis on a growth-oriented investment program.

~~Net~~Cash ~~cash~~used ~~provided~~in byinvesting ~~financing~~ activities ~~was~~were $1548 million and $43 million for the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and ~~consisted~~2009, ofrespectively. ~~$22~~For ~~million~~the ofcurrent ~~proceeds~~and ~~from~~prior ~~borrowings~~corresponding onsix-month ~~our~~periods, ~~revolver~~expenditures for property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) were $713 million and $14 million, respectively, of ~~principal~~which ~~payments~~30% onand ~~the~~42%, respectively, ~~Company’s~~reflected ~~term~~investment ~~loan~~in ~~facilities~~the AMI business. ~~There~~PP&E expenditures were nocomprised ~~cash~~of ~~financing~~equipment, ~~activities~~molds and tooling for replacement and cost efficiency, and maintenance, safety and expansion that extend useful lives. We incurred software development costs related to the ~~fiscal~~AMI ~~quarter~~business of $3 million and $4 million in the six-month periods ended ~~June~~ September 2730, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the remainder of fiscal 2011, we expect to make expenditures for PP&E, software development costs and intangible assets of approximately $19 million, reflecting our continuing emphasis on a growth-oriented investment program.

WeNet ~~maintain~~cash ~~senior~~provided ~~credit~~by ~~facilities that provide for senior secured~~ financing ~~totaling~~activities ~~$249~~was ~~million, consisting of one U.S. term loan facility in the amount of~~ $~~179~~31 million and ~~two revolving credit facilities in an aggregate amount of~~ $7020 million, ~~under~~for ~~which $54 million is available in~~ the ~~form~~six ofmonths ~~U.S.~~ended ~~dollar-denominated~~September 30, ~~loans~~2010 and ~~$16~~2009, ~~million is available in the form of U~~respectively.S. ~~dollar-,~~Net ~~euro-~~cash orprovided ~~U.K.~~by ~~sterling-denominated~~financing ~~loans.~~activities ~~Borrowing costs~~ for the ~~revolving~~current six-month ~~loans~~period ~~and~~consisted ~~approximately~~of $~~164.6~~46 million of ~~term~~proceeds ~~loans~~from ~~with~~borrowings aon ~~maturity~~our ~~date~~revolving ofcredit ~~June 3~~facilities, ~~2013~~partially ~~are~~offset ~~based~~by on$15 ~~variable~~million ~~rates~~of ~~tied~~principal ~~to adjusted~~payments ~~LIBOR,~~on ~~as defined in~~ the ~~credit~~Company’s ~~agreement,~~term ~~plus~~loan ~~a 4~~facilities.5% ~~margin,~~Net orcash ~~the~~provided ~~Alternate~~by ~~Base~~financing ~~Rate,~~activities ~~as defined~~ in the ~~credit~~prior ~~agreement,~~corresponding ~~plus~~six-month ~~3.5%,~~period ~~which~~consisted ~~includes,~~primarily inof ~~the~~$35 ~~case~~million of ~~the~~proceeds ~~revolving~~from ~~loans~~debt issuance, apartially ~~facility~~offset ~~fee~~by ~~of 1%. Borrowing costs for approximately~~ $~~14.0~~9 million of ~~term~~debt ~~loans~~issuance ~~with~~costs arelated ~~final~~to ~~maturity~~the ~~date~~amendment of ~~December 17,~~the ~~2010~~senior ~~are~~credit ~~based~~facilities onand ~~variable~~$6 ~~rates~~million ~~tied to adjusted LIBOR plus a 2% margin. See below~~ for ~~discussion regarding~~ the ~~Company’s total indebtedness at~~ ~~June 30,~~purchase ~~2010.~~of ~~The revolving credit facilities mature on December 17, 2012, and~~ the ~~term~~PDC ~~loan~~Rongtai ~~facility~~noncontrolling ~~matures~~interest on ~~June~~September 329, ~~2013~~2009.

We maintain senior credit facilities that provide for senior secured financing totaling $241 million, consisting of one U.S. term loan facility in the amount of $171 million and two revolving credit facilities in an aggregate amount of $70 million, under which $54 million is available in the form of U.S. dollar-denominated loans and $16 million is available in the form of U.S. dollar-, euro- or U.K. sterling-denominated loans. Borrowing costs for the revolving loans and approximately $164.1 million of term loans with a maturity date of June 3, 2013 are based on variable rates tied to adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the credit agreement, plus a 4.5% margin, or the Alternate Base Rate, as defined in the credit agreement, plus 3.5%, which includes, in the case of the revolving loans, a facility fee of 1%. Borrowing costs for approximately $7 million of term loans with a final maturity date of December 17, 2010 are based on variable rates tied to adjusted LIBOR plus a 2% margin. See below for discussion regarding the Company’s total indebtedness at September 30, 2010. The revolving credit facilities mature on December 17, 2012, and the term loan facility matures on June 3, 2013.

We also have $275 million of senior subordinated notes outstanding, which mature on December 15, 2013 and bear interest at the rate of 8 5/8% per annum. Interest on the senior subordinated notes is payable semi-annually in June and December of each year. The senior subordinated notes are our unsecured senior subordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment to all of our senior subordinated debt, subordinated in right of payment to all of our senior debt, including our indebtedness under our senior credit facilities, and senior in right of payment to all of our subordinated debt. The senior subordinated notes are guaranteed on a senior subordinated, unsecured basis by certain of our subsidiaries.

We may redeem the senior subordinated notes at the redemption prices indicated below (expressed as a percentage of the principal amount) plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemptions, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on December 15 of each of the years indicated below:


Period	Redemption Price
2009		102.875	%
2010		101.438	%
2011 and thereafter		100.000	%

The senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the option of the holders of such notes at a repurchase price of 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, in the event of certain change of control events related to us.

The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains certain covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to a) incur additional indebtedness (including by way of guarantee), subject to certain exceptions, unless we meet a consolidated coverage ratio of 2.0 to 1.0 or certain other conditions apply; b) pay dividends or distributions, or make certain types of investments or other restricted payments, unless we meet certain specified conditions; c) create any encumbrance or restriction on our subsidiary guarantors’ ability to pay dividends or distributions, repay loans, make loans or advances or transfer any property or assets to us; d) dispose of certain assets and capital stock of our subsidiary guarantors; e) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; f) engage in new lines of business; and g) consummate certain mergers and consolidations.

As38 of June 30, 2010, we had $481 million of total indebtedness outstanding, consisting of $275 million of senior subordinated notes, $179 million under the U.S. term loan facility and $27 million in short-term borrowings. Interest expense, net, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs, was $11 million for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010. The next scheduled principal payment on the term loan facility of approximately $7 million is due on September 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, $15 million of the facility was utilized in connection with outstanding letters of credit that have not been drawn upon. We were in compliance with all credit facility covenants at June 30, 2010.

We exceptions, ~~believe~~unless ~~that~~we ~~cash~~meet ona ~~hand~~consolidated ~~and~~coverage ~~expected~~ratio ~~cash~~of ~~flows~~2.0 ~~from~~to ~~operations,~~1.0 ~~together~~or ~~with available~~certain ~~borrowings~~other ~~under~~conditions ~~the~~apply; ~~revolving~~b) ~~credit~~pay ~~facilities~~dividends ~~constituting~~or ~~part of our senior secured credit facilities~~distributions, ~~will~~or ~~provide~~make ~~sufficient~~certain ~~funds~~types toof ~~enable~~investments usor toother restricted ~~fund our planned capital expenditures~~payments, ~~make~~unless ~~scheduled~~we ~~principal~~meet ~~and~~certain ~~interest~~specified ~~payments and~~conditions; ~~meet~~c) ~~our~~create ~~other~~any ~~cash~~encumbrance ~~requirements~~or ~~for~~restriction ~~the~~on ~~foreseeable~~our ~~future.~~subsidiary ~~Our~~guarantors’ ability to ~~make~~pay ~~scheduled~~dividends ~~payments~~or ofdistributions, ~~principal~~repay ofloans, ormake toloans ~~pay~~or ~~interest~~advances ~~on,~~ or totransfer ~~refinance,~~any ~~our~~property ~~indebtedness~~ or assets to ~~fund~~us; ~~planned~~d) ~~capital~~dispose ~~expenditures~~of ~~will~~certain ~~depend~~assets onand ~~our~~capital ~~ability~~stock ~~to generate~~of ~~cash~~our insubsidiary ~~the~~guarantors; ~~future.~~e) ~~Our~~enter ~~ability~~into tocertain ~~generate~~transactions ~~cash~~with isaffiliates; ~~subject~~f) toengage ~~general~~in ~~economic,~~new ~~financial,~~lines ~~competitive,~~of ~~legislative,~~business; ~~regulatory~~ and ~~other~~g) ~~factors~~consummate ~~that~~certain ~~are~~mergers ~~beyond~~and ~~our control~~consolidations.

InAs ~~conjunction~~of ~~with~~September 30, ~~the~~2010, ~~AMDS~~we ~~acquisition~~had $497 million of total indebtedness outstanding, consisting of $275 million of senior subordinated notes, $171 million under the ~~Company~~U.S. isterm ~~legally~~loan ~~obligated~~facility toand ~~satisfy~~$51 ~~any~~million ~~additional~~in ~~future~~short-term ~~cash~~borrowings. ~~payments~~The toincrease ~~AMDS~~in ~~based on~~short-term ~~certain~~borrowings ~~financial~~during ~~performance~~the ~~measures~~current offiscal quarter was due, in part, to the ~~acquired~~$28 ~~business~~million ~~through~~paid ~~March~~to ~~2011.~~AMDS ~~Related~~related to the performance of the acquired business, ~~the~~and ~~Company~~approximately ~~accrued~~ $~~10.5~~15 million related to ongoing operating requirements for ~~the~~working ~~fiscal~~capital. ~~quarter~~See ~~ended~~Note ~~June~~2 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item ~~30,~~1 ~~2010~~of ~~and~~this ~~$56~~Quarterly Report.1 ~~million~~Interest ~~cumulatively~~expense, net, ofexcluding ~~$18.9~~amortization ~~million~~of ~~paid~~deferred infinancing ~~accordance~~costs, ~~with~~was ~~the~~$23 ~~purchase~~million ~~agreement~~for ~~($0.9~~the ~~million~~six inmonths ~~fiscal~~ended ~~2008~~September 30, $42010.6 ~~million~~The innext ~~fiscal~~scheduled ~~2009~~principal ~~and~~payment ~~$13.4~~on ~~million~~the interm ~~fiscal~~loan ~~2010).~~facility Inof ~~our~~approximately ~~accompanying~~$7 ~~consolidated~~million ~~balance~~is ~~sheet~~due ason December 17, 2010. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, $~~28.3~~14 million isof ~~classified~~the asfacility ~~accruals~~was ~~and~~utilized ~~other~~in ~~current~~connection ~~liabilities~~with ~~and~~outstanding ~~$27.8~~letters ~~million~~of iscredit ~~classified~~that ashave ~~other~~not ~~long-term~~been ~~liabilities~~drawn upon. We ~~believe~~were ~~that~~in ~~expected~~compliance ~~cash~~with ~~flows~~all ~~from~~credit ~~operations~~facility ~~will~~covenants ~~provide~~at September 30, ~~sufficient funds to fulfill this obligation~~2010.

We believe that cash on hand and expected cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, will provide sufficient funds to enable us to fund our planned capital expenditures, make scheduled principal and interest payments and meet our other cash requirements for the foreseeable future. Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal of, or to pay interest on, or to refinance, our indebtedness or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our ability to generate cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

In conjunction with the AMDS, Telemetric and PDC Rongtai acquisitions, the Company is legally obligated to satisfy any additional future cash payments, including those that may become payable as a result of the acquired businesses achieving certain financial performance measures. See “Acquisitions” in this Item 2 and Note 2 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. We believe that expected cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings, will provide sufficient funds to fulfill these obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that would have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. We are exposed to various market risk factors such as changes in foreign currency rates and fluctuating interest rates.

Currency translation. The results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates for each period concerned. This translation has no impact on cash flow. The balance sheets of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the closing exchange rates. Any adjustments resulting from the translation are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss). As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, assets of foreign subsidiaries constituted approximately 3020% of total assets. Foreign currency exchange rate exposure is most significant with respect to the euro. ~~For the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2010 and June 27, 2009, net~~ Net sales were negatively impacted by the devaluation of foreign currencies, primarily the euro, versus the U.S. dollar by $14.56 million and $86.82 million for the fiscal quarter and six months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and by $4.5 million and $13.3 million for the prior corresponding periods, respectively.

~~Currency~~39 transaction exposure. Currency transaction exposure arises when a business has transactions denominated in foreign currencies. We have entered into forward contracts that are denominated in foreign currencies, principally euros, to offset the remeasurement impact of currency rate changes on intercompany receivables and payables. These contracts are used to offset exchange losses and gains on underlying exposures. Changes in the fair value of these forward contracts are recorded immediately in earnings. We do not enter into derivative instrument transactions for trading or speculative purposes. The purpose of our foreign currency management policy is to minimize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign denominated anticipated cash flows. As of June 30, 2010, we had no foreign currency contracts in place. We expect to continue to utilize forward contracts to manage foreign currency exchange risk in the future as appropriate.

Interest rate risk. Under the terms of the Company’s senior credit facilities, we pay a variable rate of interest based on the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) and are subject to interest rate risk as a result of changes in these rates. The Company’s total indebtedness as of June 30, 2010 was $480.9 million, of which $205.8 million bears interest at variable rates. As of June 30, 2010, substantially all of our variable-rate borrowings were under the term loan facilities consisting

ofCurrency atransaction ~~B-1 tranche and a B-3 tranche~~exposure. ~~Term~~ ~~loans~~Currency oftransaction ~~$14.0~~exposure ~~million~~arises ~~under~~when ~~the~~a ~~B-1~~business has ~~tranche~~transactions ~~bear~~denominated ~~interest~~in atforeign ~~LIBOR~~currencies. ~~plus~~We ahave 2%entered ~~margin. Term~~into ~~loans~~forward ~~under~~contracts ~~the~~that ~~B-3~~are ~~tranche~~denominated ~~bear~~in ~~interest,~~foreign ~~at our option~~currencies, atprincipally ~~Adjusted LIBOR~~euros, asto ~~defined~~offset in the ~~credit~~remeasurement ~~agreement,~~impact ~~plus~~of acurrency ~~4.5%~~rate ~~margin,~~changes oron ~~the~~intercompany ~~Alternate~~receivables ~~Base Rate plus 3~~and payables.~~5%. For~~ ~~the~~These ~~B-3~~contracts ~~tranche,~~are ~~the~~used ~~credit~~to ~~facility~~offset ~~provides~~exchange ~~for~~losses ~~a LIBOR floor of 2.5%~~ and angains ~~Alternate~~on ~~Base~~underlying ~~Rate floor of 3~~exposures.~~5%.~~ AsChanges ~~of June 30,~~in ~~2010,~~the ~~$160.0~~fair ~~million~~value of ~~the~~these ~~B-3~~forward ~~tranche~~contracts ~~was~~are ~~under~~recorded ~~the~~immediately ~~LIBOR~~in ~~option and $5~~earnings.0 ~~million~~We ofdo ~~that~~not ~~tranche~~enter ~~was~~into ~~under~~derivative ~~the~~instrument ~~Alternate~~transactions ~~Base~~for trading ~~Rate~~or ~~option~~speculative purposes. At ~~June 30,~~The ~~2010,~~purpose ~~the~~of ~~weighted-average interest rate on~~ our ~~term~~foreign ~~loan~~currency ~~facility borrowings~~management ~~was~~policy ~~approximately~~is ~~6.6%. In~~to ~~addition,~~minimize the ~~Company~~effect ~~has $50 million~~ of ~~interest~~exchange rate ~~swaps~~fluctuations inon ~~place~~certain ~~that~~foreign ~~pay~~denominated aanticipated ~~fixed~~cash ~~rate of interest and receive LIBOR~~flows. ~~Holding~~As ~~all~~of ~~other~~September 30, ~~variables constant~~2010, awe ~~change~~had inno ~~the~~foreign currency ~~LIBOR~~contracts ~~interest~~in ~~rate~~place. ofWe ~~1%, after~~expect ~~giving~~to ~~effect~~continue to ~~the~~utilize ~~interest~~forward ~~rate~~contracts ~~swaps,~~to ~~would~~manage ~~have~~foreign nocurrency ~~impact~~exchange onrisk ~~annual~~in ~~interest~~the ~~costs~~future as appropriate.

ToInterest ~~hedge~~rate ~~exposure~~risk. toUnder the terms of the Company’s senior credit facilities, we pay a variable rate of interest ~~rates~~based on the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) or the Alternate Base Rate, as defined in the ~~Company~~credit ~~has~~agreement, ~~entered~~and ~~into~~are ~~various~~subject to interest rate ~~swap~~risk ~~agreements~~as a result of changes in these rates. The Company’s total indebtedness as of September 30, 2010 was $497.2 million, of which it$222.2 million ~~receives~~bears ~~periodic~~interest at variable rates. Term loans of $7.0 million under the B-1 tranche bear interest ~~payments~~at LIBOR plus a 2% margin. Term loans under the B-3 tranche bear interest, at our option, at Adjusted LIBOR, as defined in the ~~three~~credit agreement, plus a 4.5% margin, or the Alternate Base Rate plus 3.5%. For the B-~~month~~3 tranche, the credit facility provides for a LIBOR floor of 2.5% and ~~makes~~an ~~periodic~~Alternate ~~payments~~Base atRate ~~specified~~floor ~~fixed~~of ~~rates~~3.5%. ~~See~~As ~~Note~~of 5September 30, ~~under~~2010, ~~“Notes~~$160.0 million of the B-3 totranche ~~Unaudited~~was ~~Consolidated~~under ~~Financial~~the ~~Statements”~~LIBOR inoption ~~Part~~and I$4.1 million of that tranche was under the Alternate Base Rate option. At September 30, ~~Item~~2010, the weighted-average interest rate on our credit facility borrowings was approximately 6.6%. 1Holding all other variables constant, a change in the LIBOR interest rate of ~~this~~1% ~~Quarterly~~would ~~Report~~have no material impact on annual interest costs.

To hedge exposure to variable interest rates, the Company has previously entered into various interest rate swap agreements in which it received periodic variable interest payments at the three-month LIBOR and made periodic payments at specified fixed rates. See Note 5 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. As of September 30, 2010, all interest rate swaps have expired.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

~~Pursuant~~Material toWeaknesses ~~Section 302~~Previously ofDisclosed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) promulgated thereunder, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at a reasonable assurance level, as of the Evaluation Date, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We did not effect any change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38As discussed in Item 4 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 and Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), identified material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting for each of the affected periods. Specifically, management determined that (1) there was not an effective control environment in place over the evaluation and effective technical accounting involving the execution of the Company’s revenue recognition practices with respect to multi-element customer contracts associated with our Conservations Solutions business and (2) there were additional accounting errors relating to certain aspects of our financial closing process.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act promulgated thereunder, our management, including our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In light of the material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting discussed above, which have not been fully remediated as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2010. As a result of this conclusion, management performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that the Company’s financial

statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, changes in shareholder’s equity and cash flows for the periods presented.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses

Since the Company has not yet completed all of its planned remediation activities, no assurance can be given that the material weaknesses that exist in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting have been sufficiently remediated as of the date of this filing, nor can any definite assurance be given as to when and in which period the material weaknesses might be effectively remediated. Management is working closely with the Audit Committee to monitor the ongoing remediation of the material weaknesses described above.

To address the material weakness in internal controls related to revenue recognition, new processes and controls are being planned or have now been implemented. Among other control enhancements, a complete review of all contracts to verify compliance with applicable revenue recognition accounting rules has been undertaken. We have also added new personnel to assist in contract negotiations and help identify all material issues at the time contracts are executed.

To address the material weakness in internal controls related to financial reporting, new processes and controls are being planned or have now been implemented that include enhancements to the financial statement closing process. The Company is implementing sufficient controls to verify all material journal entries have been initiated, authorized, and processed on a timely basis. In addition, an updated set of formal policies and procedures will be completed that cover all material aspects of the financial closing process, including timely, effective period-end cut-off and reconciliation procedures.

We anticipate these actions will improve our internal control over financial reporting and will address the related material weaknesses and other deficiencies identified. However, because the institutionalization of the internal control process requires repeatable process execution, and because these controls rely extensively on manual review and approval, for the successful execution of these controls, several reporting periods may be required before management is able to conclude definitively that the material weaknesses have been fully remediated.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We did not effect any change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect materially, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

WeAs ~~are,~~disclosed ~~from~~in ~~time~~our toAnnual ~~time,~~Report ~~party~~on toForm ~~legal~~10-K/A ~~proceedings~~for ~~arising~~the ~~out~~fiscal ofyear ended March 31, 2010, which was filed with the ~~operations~~SEC ofon ~~our~~December 17, ~~business.~~2010, Wethe ~~believe~~Company ~~that~~was anpreviously ~~adverse~~sued ~~outcome~~in ofpatent ~~our~~infringement ~~existing~~lawsuits ~~legal~~filed ~~proceedings,~~by ~~including~~IP ~~the~~Co. ~~proceedings~~and ~~described~~SIPCO in ~~our~~the ~~Annual~~U.S. ~~Report~~District onCourt ~~Form 10-K~~ for the ~~fiscal~~Eastern ~~year~~District ~~ended~~of ~~March 31,~~Texas. ~~2010~~The ~~and~~lawsuits ~~Note~~generally 12alleged ~~under~~that ~~“Notes~~the toCompany’s ~~Unaudited~~FlexNet ~~Consolidated~~System ~~Financial~~infringed ~~Statements”~~upon inpatents ~~Part~~owned ~~I, Item 1,~~by ofIP ~~this~~Co. ~~Quarterly~~and ~~Report~~SIPCO. On September 30, ~~would~~2010, ~~not~~the ~~have~~Company asettled ~~material~~these ~~adverse~~lawsuits. ~~impact~~As onpart ~~our~~of ~~business~~the settlement, ~~financial~~the ~~condition~~Company oragreed ~~results~~to ofpay ~~operations~~IP Co. ~~Nevertheless~~and SIPCO approximately $4 million, ~~unexpected~~payable ~~adverse~~in ~~future~~two ~~events~~installments, ~~such~~for asa annon-exclusive ~~unforeseen~~license ~~development~~to inuse ~~our~~certain ~~existing~~patents owned by IP ~~proceedings,~~Co. aand ~~significant~~SIPCO. ~~increase~~The infirst ~~the~~installment ~~number~~payment of ~~new~~approximately ~~cases~~$2 ormillion ~~changes~~was inpaid ~~our~~by ~~current~~the ~~insurance~~Company ~~arrangements,~~in ~~could~~October ~~result~~2010 inand ~~liabilities~~the ~~that~~second ~~have~~installment apayment ~~material~~of ~~adverse~~approximately ~~impact~~$2 onmillion ~~our~~is ~~business,~~payable ~~financial~~by ~~condition~~the Company on or ~~results~~before ofDecember 29, ~~operations~~2010.

We are, from time to time, party to legal proceedings arising out of the operations of our business. We believe that an adverse outcome of our existing legal proceedings, including the proceedings described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and Note 12 under “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report, which are incorporated herein by reference, would not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Nevertheless, unexpected adverse future events, such as an unforeseen development in our existing proceedings, a significant increase in the number of new cases or changes in our current insurance arrangements, could result in liabilities that have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, which was filed with the SEC on ~~May~~December 1017, 2010.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) None.

(b) None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

(a) None.

(b) None.

Item 4. Reserved

Item 5. Other Information

(a) None.

(b) None.

Item 6. Exhibits

A list of exhibits filed herewith is contained on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.

3942

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD.
Date: August 2, 2010	By:	/s/ PETER MAINZ
Date: December 17, 2010	By:	/s/ PETER MAINZ
		Peter MainzChief Executive Officer & President (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 2, 2010	By:	/s/ JEFFREY J. KYLE
Date: December 17, 2010	By:	/s/ JEFFREY J. KYLE
		Jeffrey J. Kyle Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: August 2, 2010	By:	/s/ THOMAS D. D’ORAZIO
Date: December 17, 2010	By:	/s/ THOMAS D. D’ORAZIO
		Thomas D. D’Orazio Senior Vice President, Finance(Principal Accounting Officer)
	SENSUS USA INC.
Date: August 2, 2010	By:	/s/ PETER MAINZ
Date: December 17, 2010	By:	/s/ PETER MAINZ
		Peter MainzChief Executive Officer & President (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 2, 2010	By:	/s/ JEFFREY J. KYLE
Date: December 17, 2010	By:	/s/ JEFFREY J. KYLE
		Jeffrey J. Kyle Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: August 2, 2010	By:	/s/ THOMAS D. D’ORAZIO
Date: December 17, 2010	By:	/s/ THOMAS D. D’ORAZIO
		Thomas D. D’Orazio Senior Vice President, Finance(Principal Accounting Officer)

4043

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
10.1*		Sensus Management Incentive Plan.
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

*44 ~~Management contracts and compensation plans.~~

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

TheTable fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Because the Company’s shares are not publicly traded and the Company does not have a history of issuing stock Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · SENSUS USA INC