UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011

LOGO

8540 Gander Creek Drive

Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

877.855.7243


Commission File Number	Registrant	IRS Employer Identification Number	State of Incorporation
001-32956	NEWPAGE HOLDING CORPORATION	05-0616158	Delaware
333-125952	NEWPAGE CORPORATION	05-0616156	Delaware

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


NewPage Holding Corporation	Yes x	No ¨
NewPage Corporation	Yes x	No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

NewPage Holding Corporation Yes ¨x No ¨ NewPage Corporation Yes ¨x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


NewPage Holding Corporation	Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
	Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company ¨

NewPage Corporation	Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
	Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


NewPage Holding Corporation	Yes ¨	No x
NewPage Corporation	Yes ¨	No x

There were 10 Common Shares, $0.01 per share par value, of NewPage Holding Corporation and 100 Common Shares, $0.01 per share par value, of NewPage Corporation outstanding as of ~~May~~August 1, 2011.

This Form 10-Q is a combined quarterly report being filed separately by two registrants: NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation. NewPage Corporation meets the conditions set forth in general instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.

References to “NewPage Holding” refer to NewPage Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation; references to “NewPage” refer to NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of NewPage Holding. References to “NewPage Group” refer to NewPage Group Inc., a Delaware corporation and the direct parent of NewPage Holding. Unless the context provides otherwise, references to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to NewPage Holding and its subsidiaries. All assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows presented for all periods represent those of NewPage Holding’s wholly-owned subsidiary, NewPage, except for activity related to NewPage Holding’s debt and equity and income tax effects. Unless otherwise noted, the information provided pertains to both NewPage Holding and NewPage.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other related laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws. Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, they are subject to numerous factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected or assumed in our forward-looking statements. These factors, risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following:

•

our substantial level of indebtedness

•

our ability to obtain additional financing or refinance our indebtedness may be limited

•

changes in the supply of, demand for, or prices of our products

•

general economic and business conditions in the United States and Canada and elsewhere

•

the ability of our customers to continue as a going concern, including our ability to collect accounts receivable according to customary business terms

•

the activities of competitors, including those that may be engaged in unfair trade practices

•

changes in significant operating expenses, including raw material and energy costs

•

changes in currency exchange rates

•

changes in the availability of capital

•

changes in the regulatory environment, including requirements for enhanced environmental compliance

•

the other factors described under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010

Given these risks and uncertainties, we caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, either to reflect new developments or for any other reason, except as required by law.

INDEX

		~~Page~~			Page
PART I	~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~			FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	~~Financial Statements:~~	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010					3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the second quarter and first half ended June 30, 2011 and 2010					4
	Consolidated Statements of Equity (Deficit) for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		5
	Consolidated Statements of Equity (Deficit) for the first half ended June 30, 2011 and 2010					6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		7
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the first half ended June 30, 2011 and 2010					8
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8			9
Item 2.	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22			25
Item 3.	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	28			33
Item 4.	~~Controls and Procedures~~	Controls and Procedures	29			34
PART II	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~			OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	~~Legal Proceedings~~	Legal Proceedings	29			34
Item 5.	~~Other Information~~	Other Information	30			34
Item 6.	~~Exhibits~~	Exhibits	31			35
Signatures			32			36

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010

Dollars in millions, except per share amounts

	NewPage Holding						NewPage
	Mar. 31,2011			Dec. 31,2010			Mar. 31,2011			Dec. 31,2010
	June 30,			Dec. 31,			June 30,			Dec. 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9		$	8		$	9		$	8
Accounts receivable, net		~~294~~247			292			~~294~~247			292
Inventories (Note 3)		~~551~~494			523			~~551~~494			523
Other current assets		1925			20			1925			20
Total current assets		~~873~~775			843			~~873~~775			843
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,210 as of March 31, 2011 and $1,159 as of December 31, 2010		2,509			2,558			2,509			2,558
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,264 as of June 30, 2011 and $1,159 as of December 31, 2010		2,455			2,558			2,455			2,558
Port Hawkesbury biomass project (Note 7)		1934			5			1934			5
Other assets		~~102~~99			106			~~101~~98			105
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,~~503~~363		$	3,512		$	3,~~502~~362		$	3,511
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Accounts payable	$	~~204~~226		$	195		$	~~204~~226		$	195
Other current liabilities		~~264~~197			210			~~264~~197			210
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 6)		12,~~783~~854			—			12,~~783~~854			—
Total current liabilities		23,~~251~~277			405			23,~~251~~277			405
Long-term debt (Note 6)		~~1,604~~581			3,376			~~1,380~~353			3,157
Proceeds from NSPI for Port Hawkesbury biomass project (Note 7)		8995			80			8995			80
Other long-term obligations		~~528~~516			526			~~528~~516			526
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common stock, NewPage Holding—10 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, $0.01 per share par value; NewPage—100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, $0.01 per share par value		—			—			—			—
Additional paid-in capital		~~707~~706			707			~~813~~812			813
Accumulated deficit		(1,~~373~~509	)		(1,280	)		(1,~~266~~398	)		(1,178	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(303	)		(302	)		(293	)		(292	)
Total equity (deficit)		(~~969~~1,106	)		(875	)		(~~746~~879	)		(657	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	3,~~503~~363		$	3,512		$	3,~~502~~362		$	3,511

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWPAGE HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

~~FIRST~~SECOND QUARTER AND FIRST HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

Dollars in millions

	NewPage Holding						~~NewPage~~
	First QuarterEnded Mar. 31,						First QuarterEnded Mar. 31,
	Second Quarter						First Half
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	~~904~~888		$	~~817~~890		$	~~904~~1,792		$	~~817~~1,707
Cost of sales		~~858~~887			~~849~~913			~~858~~1,745			~~849~~1,762
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4036			4958			4076			49107
Interest expense (including non-cash interest expense of $17, $16, $12 and $12)		100			101			95			97
Interest expense (including non-cash interest expense of $18, $16, $35 and $32)		100			97			200			198
Other (income) expense, net (Note 10)		(21	)		(3—	)		(21	)		(3	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(92136	)		(~~179~~178	)		(87228	)		(~~175~~357	)
Income tax (benefit)		1—			—1			1			—1
Net income (loss)	$	(93136	)	$	(179	)	$	(88229	)	$	(~~175~~358	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWPAGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

SECOND QUARTER AND FIRST HALF ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

Dollars in millions


	NewPage
	Second Quarter						First Half
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	888		$	890		$	1,792		$	1,707

Cost of sales		887			913			1,745			1,762
Selling, general and administrative expenses		36			58			76			107
Interest expense (including non-cash interest expense of $14, $11, $26 and $23)		96			92			191			189
Other (income) expense, net (Note 10)		1			—			(1	)		(3	)


Income (loss) before income taxes		(132	)		(173	)		(219	)		(348	)
Income tax (benefit)		—			1			1			1


Net income (loss)	$	(132	)	$	(174	)	$	(220	)	$	(349	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWPAGE HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (DEFICIT) (unaudited)

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011

Dollars in millions

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in ~~Capital~~			Accumulated ~~Deficit~~			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~			~~Total~~
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			(Loss)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010		10	$	—	$	707		$	(1,280	)	$	(302	)	$	(875	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)									(93229	)					(93229	)
Defined-benefit postretirement plans:
Amortization of net actuarial loss on defined benefit plans												(1	)		(1	)
Cash-flow hedges:
Reclassification adjustment to net income (loss)												1			1
Foreign currency translation adjustment												(1	)		(1	)
Comprehensive income (loss)														$	(94230	)
Balance at March 31, 2011		10	$	—	$	707		$	(1,373	)	$	(303	)	$	(969	)
Equity awards (Note 8)						(1	)								(1	)
Balance at June 30, 2011		10	$	—	$	706		$	(1,509	)	$	(303	)	$	(1,106	)

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2010

Dollars in millions

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in ~~Capital~~		Accumulated ~~Deficit~~			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~			~~Total~~
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			(Loss)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009		10	$	—	$	685	$	(606	)	$	(265	)	$	(186	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)								(~~179~~358	)					(~~179~~358	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss on defined benefit plans											(1	)		(1	)
Cash-flow hedges:
Change in unrealized gains (losses)											(2	)		(2	)
Change in unrealized gains (losses), net of tax benefits of $1											(1	)		(1	)
Reclassification adjustment to net income (loss)											1			1
Reclassification adjustment to net income (loss), net of tax of $1											1			1
Foreign currency translation adjustment											1			1
Foreign currency translation adjustments											1			1
Comprehensive income (loss)													$	(~~180~~356	)
Equity awards (Note 8)						820								820
Balance at March 31, 2010		10	$	—	$	693	$	(785	)	$	(266	)	$	(358	)
Balance at June 30, 2010		10	$	—	$	705	$	(964	)	$	(263	)	$	(522	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWPAGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (DEFICIT) (unaudited)

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011

Dollars in millions

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in ~~Capital~~			Accumulated ~~Deficit~~			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~			~~Total~~
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			(Loss)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010		100	$	—	$	813		$	(1,178	)	$	(292	)	$	(657	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)									(88220	)					(88220	)
Defined-benefit postretirement plans:
Amortization of net actuarial loss on defined benefit plans												(1	)		(1	)
Cash-flow hedges:
Reclassification adjustment to net income (loss)												1			1
Foreign currency translation adjustment												(1	)		(1	)
Comprehensive income (loss)														$	(89221	)
Balance at March 31, 2011		100	$	—	$	813		$	(1,266	)	$	(293	)	$	(746	)
Equity awards (Note 8)						(1	)								(1	)
Balance at June 30, 2011		100	$	—	$	812		$	(1,398	)	$	(293	)	$	(879	)

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2010

Dollars in millions

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in ~~Capital~~		Accumulated ~~Deficit~~			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~			~~Total~~
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			(Loss)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009		100	$	—	$	791	$	(522	)	$	(255	)	$	14
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)								(~~175~~349	)					(~~175~~349	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss on defined benefit plans											(1	)		(1	)
Cash-flow hedges:
Change in unrealized gains (losses)											(2	)		(2	)
Change in unrealized gains (losses), net of tax benefit of $1											(1	)		(1	)
Reclassification adjustment to net income (loss)											1			1
Reclassification adjustment to net income (loss), net of tax of $1											1			1
Foreign currency translation adjustment											1			1
Comprehensive income (loss)													$	(~~176~~347	)
Equity awards (Note 8)						820								820
Balance at March 31, 2010		100	$	—	$	799	$	(697	)	$	(256	)	$	(154	)
Balance at June 30, 2010		100	$	—	$	811	$	(871	)	$	(253	)	$	(313	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011 AND 2010

Dollars in millions

	NewPage Holding						NewPage
	First QuarterEnded Mar. 31,						First QuarterEnded Mar. 31,
	First Half						First Half
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	(93229	)	$	(~~179~~358	)	$	(88220	)	$	(~~175~~349	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		62121			68135			62121			68135
Non-cash interest expense		1735			1632			1226			1223
(Gain) loss on disposal and impairment of assets		15			68			15			68
Non-cash U.S. pension expense		611			917			611			917
Equity award expense (Note 8)		—(1	)		819			—(1	)		819
Change in operating assets and liabilities		2756			6820			2756			6820
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities		20(2	)		(4127	)		20(2	)		(4127	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(1433	)		(1131	)		(1433	)		(1131	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		111			1112			111			1112
Expenditures for Port Hawkesbury biomass project (Note 7)		(1019	)		—(1	)		(1019	)		—(1	)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities		(2341	)		—(20	)		(2341	)		—(20	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			67			—			67
Payment of financing costs		(1	)		(4	)		(1	)		(4	)
Borrowings on revolving credit facility		~~244~~582			~~124~~442			~~244~~582			~~124~~442
Payments on revolving credit facility		(~~242~~543	)		(~~176~~358	)		(~~242~~543	)		(~~176~~358	)
Proceeds from NSPI for Port Hawkesbury biomass project (Note 7)		25			—			25			—
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		343			11147			343			11147
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1			12			1			12
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1			82			1			82
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		8			5			8			5
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	9		$	137		$	9		$	137
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest	$	10170		$	13179		$	10170		$	13179

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NEWPAGE HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NEWPAGE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Dollars in millions, except per share amounts

1.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

NewPage Holding Corporation (“NewPage Holding”) is a holding company that owns all of the outstanding capital stock of NewPage Corporation. NewPage Corporation and its subsidiaries are engaged in manufacturing, marketing and distributing printing papers used primarily for commercial printing, magazines, catalogs, textbooks and labels. Our products include coated, uncoated, supercalendered, newsprint and specialty papers and market pulp. Our products are manufactured at multiple mills in the United States and one mill in Canada and are supported by multiple distribution and converting locations. We operate within one operating segment. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NewPage Holding and all entities it controls. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Unless the context provides otherwise, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to NewPage Holding and its consolidated subsidiaries, including NewPage Corporation, a separate public-reporting company. Unless otherwise noted, “NewPage” refers to NewPage Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Other than NewPage Holding’s debt obligation and related financing costs, interest expense and income tax effects, all other assets, liabilities, income, expenses, and cash flows presented for all periods represent those of its wholly-owned subsidiary, NewPage. Unless otherwise noted, the information provided pertains to both NewPage Holding and NewPage.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited. However, in the opinion of management, these financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

2.	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative Financial Instruments

We periodically use derivative financial instruments as part of our overall strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with foreign currency exchange rate and natural gas price fluctuations. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. We regularly monitor the credit-worthiness of the counterparties to our derivative instruments in order to manage our credit risk exposures under these agreements. Our risk of loss in the event of nonperformance by any counterparty under derivative financial instrument agreements is not considered material by management. These derivative instruments are measured at fair value and are classified as other assets or other long-term obligations on our balance sheets depending on the fair value of the instrument.

If the derivative is designated as a fair-value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. If the derivative is designated as a cash-flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in

accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations when the hedged item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash-flow hedges and financial instruments not designated as hedges are recognized in earnings.

Interest Rates

We measure the fair values of our interest rate swaps using observable interest-rate yield curves for comparable assets and liabilities at commonly quoted intervals. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no interest rate swaps outstanding. ~~During~~We ~~the first quarter of 2010, we~~ recognized in interest expense a (gain) loss of $4(1) and $3 for ~~interest~~the second quarter and first half ended June 30, 2010, for interest rate swaps that did not qualify for hedge accounting. We paid cash of $7 6 and $13 on our interest rate agreements for the ~~first~~second quarter and first half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Also, during the first quarter of 2010, we locked in the floating rate components of the remaining interest rate swaps and subsequently settled the remaining liability in the third quarter of 2010.

Natural Gas

In order to hedge the future cost of natural gas consumed at our mills, we engage in financial hedging of future gas purchase prices, designated as cash flow hedges. We hedge with financial instruments that are priced based on New York Mercantile Exchange natural gas futures contracts. We do not hedge basis (the effect of varying delivery points or locations) or transportation costs (the cost to transport the gas from the delivery point to a company location) under these transactions. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we were party to natural gas futures contracts for notional amounts aggregating ~~560~~ 320,000 and 800,000 MMBTUs, which expire through October 2011. We measure the fair values of our natural gas contracts based on natural gas futures contracts priced on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair values and carrying amounts of our financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are as follows:

	Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)	June 30,2011			Dec. 31,2010
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)	2011			2010
Qualifying as hedges—
Other long-term liabilities—natural gas contracts	$	(1	)	$	(2	)

The amount of gain (loss) on cash flow hedges recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and the amount reclassified to income (loss) during the ~~first~~second quarter and first half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

	Amount ofgain (loss)recognized			Location of gain(loss) reclassifiedfrom AOCI to		Amount ofgain (loss)reclassifiedfrom AOCIto income
Derivative Type	in OCI			income (loss)		(loss)
First Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
Natural gas contracts	$	—			Cost of sales	$	(1	)
First Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
Natural gas contracts		(2	)		Cost of sales		(1	)


Derivative Type	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI			Location of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI to income (loss)		Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI to income (loss)

*Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2011*
Natural gas contracts	$	—			Cost of sales	$	—

*First Half Ended June 30, 2011*
Natural gas contracts		—			Cost of sales		(1	)

*Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2010*
Natural gas contracts		—			Cost of sales		(1	)

*First Half Ended June 30, 2010*
Natural gas contracts		(2	)		Cost of sales		(2	)

Assets and Liabilities Not Carried at Fair Value

The fair value of long-term debt is based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current interest rates available to us for debt of similar terms and maturities. At ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amounts of all other assets and liabilities that qualify as financial instruments approximated their fair value. Details of our long-term debt are as follows:

	March 31, 2011						December 31, 2010
	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Fair			Carrying			Fair			Carrying
	FairValue			CarryingAmount			FairValue			CarryingAmount
	Value			Amount			Value			Amount
Long-term debt:
NewPage Holding	$	(2,~~668~~125	)	$	(3,~~236~~282	)	$	(2,456	)	$	(3,224	)
NewPage		(2,~~636~~118	)		(3,~~012~~054	)		(2,425	)		(3,005	)

Other Fair Value Disclosures

See Note 4 for fair value information of assets held for sale recorded at fair value.

3.	INVENTORIES

Inventories as of ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of:

	Mar. 31,		Dec. 31,
	June 30,2011		Dec. 31,2010
	2011		2010
Finished and in-process goods	$	288	$	298
Finished and in-process goods	$	306	$	298
Raw materials		72		91
Raw materials		110		91
Stores and supplies		134		134
Stores and supplies		135		134
	$	494	$	523
	$	551	$	523

If inventories had been valued at current costs, they would have been valued at $~~540~~496 and $496 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

4.	PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment includes approximately $4333 in net book value of assets held for sale as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. The assets held for sale are classified as Level 3 for the use of inputs in determining fair value.

5.	ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

Accounts payable as of ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 includes $1136 and $31 of outstanding checks in excess of cash.

6.	LONG-TERM DEBT

The balances of long-term debt as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

	Mar. 31,		Dec. 31,
	June 30,		Dec. 31,
	2011		2010
NewPage:
Revolving credit facility	$	95131	$	92
11.375% first-lien senior secured notes (face amount $1,770)		1,~~688~~692		1,684
Floating rate second-lien senior secured notes (LIBOR plus 6.25%)		225		225
10% second-lien senior secured notes (face amount $806)		~~805~~806		805
12% senior subordinated notes (face amount $200)		~~199~~200		199
Capital lease		~~151~~153		152
Total long-term debt, including current portion		3,~~163~~207		3,157
Current portion of long-term debt		12,~~783~~854		—
Subtotal		~~1,380~~353		3,157
NewPage Holding—
Senior unsecured NewPage Holding PIK Notes (face amount $228 and $224; LIBOR plus 7.00%)		224		219
Senior unsecured NewPage Holding PIK Notes (face amount $232 and $224; LIBOR plus 7.00%)		228		219
Long-term debt	$	~~1,604~~581	$	3,376

In January 2011, we amended our revolving credit facility to extend its termination date. For those lenders who accepted this amendment (aggregating to $470), the revolving credit facility matures on December 21, 2012, unless we do not repay or refinance our floating rate and 10% second-lien senior secured notes (“Second-Lien Notes”) by December 2, 2011, in which case the revolving credit facility matures on March 1, 2012. For the remaining $30 of commitment, the revolving credit facility matures on October 3, 2011, rather than December 21, 2012, ~~unless~~as wea doresult of not ~~repay or refinance~~ refinancing our Second-Lien Notes by July 4, 2011~~, in which case the $30 portion of the revolving credit facility matures on October 3, 2011~~.

The 11.375% senior secured first-lien notes (the “First-Lien Notes”) mature on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2014 or (ii) the date that is 31 days prior to the maturity date of the Second-Lien Notes, the senior subordinated notes, the NewPage Holding PIK notes or any refinancing thereof. The Second-Lien Notes mature on May 1, 2012. However, if we do not repay or refinance our Second-Lien Notes by January 31, 2012, the First-Lien Notes would mature on March 31, 2012. The senior subordinated notes mature on May 1, 2013. The NewPage Holding PIK Notes mature on November 1, 2013.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $12,~~378~~502. This deficit isresults ~~driven~~from by the classification of our First-Lien Notes, ~~and~~ our ~~revolving credit facility as current liabilities. Absent a refinancing of our~~ Second-Lien Notes, an additional $1,030 will become current during the second quarter of 2011. We are exploring various alternatives to address our ongoing capital needs. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, or that we will be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Nor can we assure you that these measures will be sufficient to satisfy our scheduled debt service obligations, or that we will be able to fund our business and ~~operations without additional capital. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or refinance~~ our ~~debt, including our~~ revolving credit facility ~~which~~as iscurrent aliabilities. Also, ~~principal~~as ~~source~~ of ~~our liquidity~~June 30, ~~prior to the scheduled maturities~~2011, itwe ~~would~~ have a$48 ~~material~~in ~~adverse~~deferred ~~effect~~financing ~~on our financial condition~~costs, ~~the~~including ~~value~~$47 ~~of the outstanding debt and our ability to make required cash payments under our indebtedness.~~ for

1112

NewPage, recorded in other assets. We have retained advisors to assist us in exploring various restructuring alternatives and are engaged in discussions with various stakeholders to address our ongoing capital needs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, or that we will be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to refinance our debt or generate sufficient cash flow to service our obligations, we will be required to seek to restructure our existing debt or to voluntarily seek, or be forced to seek, protection under the Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and applicable Canadian laws. Any such actions would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, the value of the outstanding debt and our ability to make required cash payments under our indebtedness.

7.	PORT HAWKESBURY BIOMASS PROJECT

In November 2010, NewPage Port Hawkesbury Corp. (“NPPH”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of NewPage, completed the sale of certain assets, including a boiler and land at the Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia mill, to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (“NSPI”) for a cash sales price of $79. The assets and proceeds of this sale will remain on our books until the completion of the construction phase (proceeds will be shown as a long-term liability).

In addition, NSPI and NPPH entered into a construction agreement for NPPH to construct for NSPI a biomass cogeneration utility plant for the generation of electricity by December 31, 2012 for approximately C$93. All costs of construction up to C$93 will be paid or reimbursed by NSPI. All costs paid directly by NSPI will be excluded from our consolidated statement of cash flows. For the first half ended June 30, 2011, direct payments made by NSPI totaled $10. As part of the construction agreement, NPPH is subject to damages for failure to complete certain milestones on time, subject to limitations as provided in the agreement. In addition, NewPage issued a performance guarantee to NSPI, subject to a limitation of C$29, if NPPH defaults on the agreement. NewPage also issued a letter of credit of $10 to NSPI in November 2010 and an additional letter of credit of $5 in January 2011 in accordance with the terms of the construction agreement. All construction costs incurred, both directly and indirectly, will become other assets and all reimbursements and direct payments by NSPI will become long-term liabilities, pending completion of the construction. Upon completion of the construction phase, all the previously described assets and liabilities will be de-recognized from the balance sheet and recognized as (gain) loss on sale of assets in the statement of operations.

NSPI and NPPH also entered into a management, operations and maintenance agreement related to NPPH operating the utility assets for and under the control of NSPI for an initial period of 25 years plus the period prior to completion of the turbine, with three automatic five-year renewal terms, unless notice of termination is given. In exchange for these services, NPPH will receive payment from NSPI based upon the amount of energy produced and NPPH will receive a portion of the steam generated from the utility plant for its needs. NPPH is subject to liquidated damages in the event that a minimum level of output is not achieved. In addition, NewPage issued a performance guarantee to NSPI, subject to a limitation of C$15, if NPPH defaults on the agreement.

8.	EQUITY

Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the ~~first~~second quarter and first half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 is equity award expense of $1 and an adjustment to equity award expense of $(2) associated with the forfeiture of unvested stock options during the second quarter of 2011. Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter and first half ended June 30, 2010 is equity award expense of ~~zero~~$11 and $819. In February 2010, the compensation committee amended the outstanding stock option awards of employees and directors to change the exercise price to $2.00 per share and to vest the unearned performance-based options for 2008 and 2009. Included in the amount of equity award expense ~~for 2010 is $6 to reflect the effects of the modification on the vested time-based options and the vesting of the prior-year unearned performance-based options.~~

1213

for the second quarter and first half ended June 30, 2010 is $1 and $7 to reflect the effects of the modification on the vested time-based options and the vesting of the prior-year unearned performance-based options. Also included in the amount of equity award expense for the second quarter and first half ended June 30, 2010 is $4 of remaining unamortized grant-date fair value relating to the accelerated vesting of stock options previously awarded to certain former executive officers. In accordance with their stock option agreements, upon their separation all of their outstanding stock options became vested. None of these options were exercised by the executive officers.

The following table summarizes activity in the plan:

Shares of NewPage Group issuable under stock options, in thousands	Options			Weighted-averageexerciseprice
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		3,250		$	1.95
Granted		379			2.00
Outstanding at March 31, 2011		3,629			1.95
Forfeited or expired		(888	)		2.00
Exercisable at March 31, 2011		2,097			2.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2011		2,741			1.94
Exercisable at June 30, 2011		1,632			2.00

The outstanding options and the exercisable options at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 have a weighted-average remaining ~~contractual~~ contractual life of 76.17 years.

We utilize a Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of other variables. These variables include expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors (term of option). We estimate the expected term of options granted by incorporating the contractual term of the options and employees’ expected exercise behaviors. We estimate the volatility of NewPage Group’s common stock by considering volatility of appropriate peer companies and adjusting for factors unique to our stock, including the effect of debt leverage.

Assumptions used to determine the fair value of option grants are as follows:

	First Quarter
	First Half
	Ended March 31,
	Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
Weighted-average fair value of options granted	$	0.38		$	2.4168
Weighted-average assumptions used for grants:
Expected volatility		90	%		90	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.4	%		2.50	%
Expected life of option (in years)		5			4

9.	RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

A summary of the components of net periodic costs for the ~~first~~second quarter and first half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

Pension Plans

	U.S. Plans						Canadian Plans
	First Quarter						First Quarter
	Second QuarterEnded June 30,						Second Quarter Ended June 30,
	Ended Mar. 31,						Ended Mar. 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	4		$	6		$	1		$	1
Interest cost		16			16			5			5
Expected return on plan assets		(1718	)		(1617	)		(56	)		(5	)
Amortization of net loss		3			3			1			1—
Net periodic cost	$	65		$	98		$	21		$	21
	U.S. Plans						Canadian Plans
	First Half Ended June 30,						First Half Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	8		$	12		$	2		$	2
Interest cost		32			32			10			10
Expected return on plan assets		(35	)		(33	)		(11	)		(10	)
Amortization of net loss		6			6			2			1
Net periodic cost	$	11		$	17		$	3		$	3

Other Postretirement Plans

	U.S. Plans						Canadian Plans
	First Quarter						First Quarter
	Second Quarter Ended June 30,						Second Quarter Ended June 30,
	Ended Mar. 31,						Ended Mar. 31,
	2011			2010			2011		2010
Service cost	$	1—		$	—1		$	—	$	—1
Interest cost		12			21			—		—
Amortization of net prior service cost (credit)		(3	)		(3	)		—		—
Net periodic cost (income)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	—	$	—1
	U.S. Plans						Canadian Plans
	First Half Ended June 30,						First Half Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011		2010
Service cost	$	1		$	1		$	—	$	1
Interest cost		3			3			—		—
Amortization of net prior service cost (credit)		(6	)		(6	)		—		—
Net periodic cost (income)	$	(2	)	$	(2	)	$	—	$	1

Workers at our Central Wisconsin, Escanaba, and Rumford mills ratified collective bargaining agreements with various unions during and subsequent to the first half of 2011. These collective bargaining agreements in the aggregate will result in a re-measurement of our U.S. Plans in the third

quarter of 2011. The change in pension and other postretirement expense for 2011 is not expected to be material.

During the second quarter 2011, a supplemental retirement plan for certain Port Hawkesbury employees was fully funded with a cash contribution of $12, which resulted in a net pension asset of $4.

10.

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE

Other (income) expense during the first ~~quarter~~half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 was $(21) and $(3). ~~During~~The ~~the~~amount ~~first~~recognized ~~quarter~~in ~~ended~~the ~~March 31,~~first half of 2010, weincludes ~~recognized~~ $11 of net loss on disposal and impairment of assets ~~in other (income) expense. In addition~~, ~~we recognized~~offset by $(13) of (income) recognized for alternative fuel mixture tax credits ~~during the first quarter ended March 31, 2010, as income recognition criteria was met during the quarter~~.

11.

INCOME TAXES

For the ~~first~~second quarter and first half ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011 and 2010, we recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax benefit for federal income taxes and for certain states as it was more likely than not that we would not realize those benefits.

12.

RESTRUCTURING

Whiting Mill Closure

~~During~~In ~~the~~February ~~fourth quarter of 2010~~2011, we ~~announced~~permanently ~~the~~closed ~~permanent~~our ~~closure of the~~ Whiting, Wisconsin mill ~~by the end of February 2011~~. Approximately 360 employees at the facility were affected. ~~The~~We made the decision to close the facility ~~was made~~ in order to better align capacity with market demand. As a result of this action, including the evaluation of capacity needs, during the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded asset impairment charges for the Whiting mill and the previously-closed Kimberly mill of $196 in other (income) expense and classified these assets as held for sale. During the ~~fourth quarter of 2010 and~~ first ~~quarter~~half of 2011, we recognized $~~2 and $~~5 of employee-related costs recorded in cost of sales. In addition, during the ~~first~~second quarter and first half of 2011, we recognized $21 and $3 in cost of sales for contract termination and other closure related costs and we expect to recognize additional charges in cost of sales of approximately $1514 ~~to $20~~ for contract termination and other closure related costs during 2011 and subsequent years as contract terms expire. The facility closure and related activities ~~are~~have ~~expected~~been ~~to be~~ substantially completed during the first half of 2011. The severance and other closure cost require the outlay of cash while the asset impairment charge represents a non-cash charge. ~~We expect no material effect on future earnings or cash flows as a result of the Whiting mill closure.~~

14The activity in the accrued restructuring liability relating to these actions for the first half ended June 30, 2011 was as follows:


	Closure			Employee
	Costs			Costs

Balance accrued at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	2
Current charges		3			5
Payments		(3	)		(5	)

Balance accrued at June 30, 2011	$	—		$	2

The activity in the accrued restructuring liability relating to these actions for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011 was as follows:

	ClosureCosts			EmployeeCosts
Balance accrued at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	2
Current charges		2			5
Payments		(2	)		(2	)
Balance accrued at March 31, 2011	$	—		$	5

13.

DISPOSITION OF ASSETS

In March 2011, Rumford Paper Company (“Rumford”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NewPage ~~Corporation~~, and Rumford Cogeneration Company Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of Rumford, both indirect subsidiaries of NewPage Holding ~~Corporation~~, entered into an Asset Sale Agreement for the sale of Rumford’s cogeneration energy assets to ReEnergy Rumford LLC (“ReEnergy”) for a sale price of $61, payable one-half in cash at closing and one-half in the form of a 10-year note receivable. The transaction also contemplates an ongoing contractual relationship between the parties, pursuant to which Rumford will supply biomass fuel to ReEnergy and ReEnergy will supply electricity and thermal energy to Rumford. The transaction is not expected to have a material effect on the operating costs of the Rumford mill. We plan to invest the net cash proceeds in our business or use the proceeds to repay indebtedness, or both, in accordance with the terms of our debt instruments. The transaction, which is expected to close during the second or third quarter of 2011, is subject to customary conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and the finalization of agreements outlined in term sheets.

In16 February 2010, Consolidated Water Power Company (“CWPCo”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of NewPage, announced that it signed an agreement with Wisconsin Rapids Water Works Lighting Commission to sell the CWPCo utility transmission and distribution assets (“CWPCo Utility”), as amended. The purchase price will be equal to the net book value of the assets at the time of closing, subject to adjustment in the agreement. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals. In November 2010, CWPCo entered into an asset sale agreement to sell five hydroelectric projects to Great Lakes Utilities for a net cash sales price of approximately $70. The closing of the transaction is subject to completion of the CWPCo Utility sale and regulatory approval. These transactions are expected to close in 2011. We continue to hold and operate the assets in the normal course of our operations.

energy assets to ReEnergy Rumford LLC (“ReEnergy”) for a sale price of $61, payable one-half in cash at closing and one-half in the form of a 10-year note receivable. The transaction also contemplates an ongoing contractual relationship between the parties, pursuant to which Rumford will supply biomass fuel to ReEnergy and ReEnergy will supply electricity and thermal energy to Rumford. The transaction is not expected to have a material effect on the operating costs of the Rumford mill. We plan to invest the net cash proceeds in our business or use the proceeds to repay indebtedness, or both, in accordance with the terms of our debt instruments. The transaction is subject to various conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and the finalization of agreements outlined in term sheets. It is uncertain whether or when this transaction will close, as certain conditions to closing the transaction may not be satisfied. We are exploring options to address these conditions.

In February 2010, CWPCo announced that it signed an agreement with Wisconsin Rapids Water Works Lighting Commission to sell the CWPCo Utility, as amended. The purchase price will be equal to the net book value of the assets at the time of closing, subject to adjustment in the agreement. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals. It is uncertain whether or when this transaction will close, as certain conditions to closing the transaction may not be satisfied. We are exploring options to address these conditions. On November 1, 2010, CWPCo entered into an asset sale agreement to sell five hydroelectric projects to Great Lakes Utilities for a net cash sales price of approximately $70. The closing of the transaction is subject to completion of the CWPCo Utility sale and regulatory approval. We continue to hold and use the assets in the normal course of our operations.

14.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In a notice dated January 25, 2011, staff at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, reported that they had preliminarily determined that our subsidiary, Rumford Paper Company, or Rumford, violated FERC regulations in connection with Rumford’s participation in ISO-New England’s Day Ahead Load Response Program from July 2007 through February 2008. Under the program, participants were paid to reduce their electrical load on the New England power grid from their “baseline” load levels. FERC asserts that Rumford improperly established and maintained an artificially high baseline, allowing it to receive increased payments under the program. Rumford cooperated with FERC throughout its investigation and has denied any wrongdoing.

Claims have been made against us for the costs of environmental remediation measures taken or to be taken. We are also involved in various other litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Reserves for these liabilities have been established and no insurance recoveries have been anticipated in the determination of the reserves. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the currently expected outcome of any matter, lawsuit or claim that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

15. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) — Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). The amendments in this ASU require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for us as of January 1, 2012 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard will only impact the presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

~~these~~In ~~matters~~May ~~cannot~~2011, bethe ~~predicted~~FASB ~~with~~issued ~~certainty~~Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, weFair doValue ~~not~~Measurement ~~believe~~(Topic 820) ~~that~~— ~~the~~Amendments ~~currently~~to ~~expected~~Achieve ~~outcome~~Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (ASU 2011-04) . The amendments in this ASU clarifies the application of ~~any~~existing ~~matter~~guidance and disclosure requirements, ~~lawsuit~~changes orcertain ~~claim~~fair ~~that~~value ismeasurement ~~pending~~principles orand ~~threatened~~enhances disclosures about fair value measurements, orparticularly ~~all~~for oflevel ~~them~~3 ~~combined~~fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for us as of January 1, 2012 and ~~will~~is to be applied on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 is not expected to have a material ~~adverse~~ effect on our consolidated financial ~~condition~~position, results of operations orand ~~liquidity~~cash flows.

1516. SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION

NewPage has issued $1,770 face amount of First Lien Notes, $1,031 face amount of Second Lien Notes and $200 face amount of 12% senior subordinated notes. These notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a full and unconditional basis by NewPage’s 100%-owned subsidiaries, except CWPCo and Rumford Cogeneration Company Limited Partnership, our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The following condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared from financial information on the same basis of accounting as the consolidated financial statements. Investments in our subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method.

1618

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011

	NewPageCorporation			GuarantorSubsidiaries		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Consolidation/Eliminations			Consolidated
						Non-
	NewPage			Guarantor		Guarantor		Consolidation/
	Corporation			Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1—		$	—1	$	8	$	—		$	9
Accounts receivable		~~236~~191			5755		1		—			~~294~~247
Inventories		~~229~~215			~~322~~279		—		—			~~551~~494
Other current assets		1216			68		1		—			1925
Total current assets		~~478~~422			~~385~~343		10		—			~~873~~775
Intercompany receivables		1,~~272~~276			~~552~~631		~~179~~192		(2,~~003~~099	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		25			2,~~437~~383		47		—			2,~~509~~455
Investment in subsidiaries		1,~~562~~554			5960		—		(1,~~621~~614	)		—
Port Hawkesbury biomass project		—			1934		—		—			1934
Other assets		9486			611		1		—			~~101~~98
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,~~431~~363		$	3,~~458~~462	$	~~237~~250	$	(3,~~624~~713	)	$	3,~~502~~362
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Accounts payable	$	4159		$	~~162~~167	$	1—	$	—		$	~~204~~226
Other current liabilities		~~164~~90			96103		4		—			~~264~~197
Current maturities of long-term debt		12,~~783~~854			—		—		—			12,~~783~~854
Total current liabilities		13,~~988~~003			~~258~~270		54		—			23,~~251~~277
Intercompany payables		~~544~~623			1,~~296~~300		~~163~~176		(2,~~003~~099	)		—
Long-term debt		~~1,229~~200			~~151~~153		—		—			~~1,380~~353
Proceeds from NSPI for Port Hawkesbury biomass project		—			8995		—		—			8995
Other long-term liabilities		416			~~102~~90		10		—			~~528~~516
Equity (deficit)		(~~746~~879	)		1,~~562~~554		5960		(1,~~621~~614	)		(~~746~~879	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	3,~~431~~363		$	3,~~458~~462	$	~~237~~250	$	(3,~~624~~713	)	$	3,~~502~~362

1719

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

DECEMBER 31, 2010

	NewPageCorporation			GuarantorSubsidiaries		Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Consolidation/Eliminations			Consolidated
						Non-
	NewPage			Guarantor		Guarantor		Consolidation/
	Corporation			Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1		$	—	$	7	$	—		$	8
Accounts receivable		226			65		1		—			292
Inventories		218			305		—		—			523
Other current assets		12			7		1		—			20
Total current assets		457			377		9		—			843
Intercompany receivables		1,250			504		162		(1,916	)		—
Property, plant and equipment, net		26			2,485		47		—			2,558
Port Hawkesbury biomass project		—			5		—		—			5
Investment in subsidiaries		1,554			57		—		(1,611	)		—
Other assets		98			6		1		—			105
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,385		$	3,434	$	219	$	(3,527	)	$	3,511
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Accounts payable	$	50		$	144	$	1	$	—		$	195
Other current liabilities		71			133		6		—			210
Total current liabilities		121			277		7		—			405
Intercompany payables		504			1,267		145		(1,916	)		—
Long-term debt		3,005			152		—		—			3,157
Proceeds from NSPI for Port Hawkesbury biomass project		—			80		—		—			80
Other long-term liabilities		412			104		10		—			526
Equity (Deficit)		(657	)		1,554		57		(1,611	)		(657	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	3,385		$	3,434	$	219	$	(3,527	)	$	3,511

1820

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

~~FIRST~~SECOND QUARTER ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011

	NewPageCorporation			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Consolidation/Eliminations			Consolidated
							Non-
Net sales	$	798		$	814		$	19	$	(727	)	$	904
	NewPage			Guarantor			Guarantor		Consolidation/
Cost of sales		765			802			18		(727	)		858
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Selling, general and administrative expenses		39			1			—		—			40
Net sales	$	778		$	818		$	16	$	(724	)	$	888
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		(10	)		(1	)		—		11			—
Cost of sales		772			823			16		(724	)		887
Interest expense		92			3			—		—			95
Selling, general and administrative expenses		36			—			—		—			36
Other (income) expense, net		—			(2	)		—		—			(2	)
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		10			—			—		(10	)		—
Income (loss) before income taxes		(88	)		11			1		(11	)		(87	)
Interest expense		92			4			—		—			96
Income tax (benefit)		—			1			—		—			1
Other (income) expense, net		—			1			—		—			1
Net income (loss)	$	(88	)	$	10		$	1	$	(11	)	$	(88	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(132	)		(10	)		—		10			(132	)
Income tax (benefit)		—			—			—		—			—
Net income (loss)	$	(132	)	$	(10	)	$	—	$	10		$	(132	)

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~ 31JUNE 30, ~~2010~~2011

	NewPageCorporation			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiary		Consolidation/Eliminations			Consolidated
							Non-
Net sales	$	732		$	758		$	21	$	(694	)	$	817
	NewPage			Guarantor			Guarantor		Consolidation/
Cost of sales		752			770			21		(694	)		849
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Selling, general and administrative expenses		49			—			—		—			49
Net sales	$	1,576		$	1,632		$	35	$	(1,451	)	$	1,792
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		27			—			—		(27	)		—
Cost of sales		1,537			1,625			34		(1,451	)		1,745
Interest expense		93			4			—		—			97
Selling, general and administrative expenses		75			1			—		—			76
Other (income) expense, net		(14	)		11			—		—			(3	)
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		—			(1	)		—		1			—
Income (loss) before income taxes		(175	)		(27	)		—		27			(175	)
Interest expense		184			7			—		—			191
Income tax (benefit)		—			—			—		—			—
Other (income) expense, net		—			(1	)		—		—			(1	)
Net income (loss)	$	(175	)	$	(27	)	$	—	$	27		$	(175	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(220	)		1			1		(1	)		(219	)
Income tax (benefit)		—			1			—		—			1
Net income (loss)	$	(220	)	$	—		$	1	$	(1	)	$	(220	)

1921

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

SECOND QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010


							Non-
	NewPage			Guarantor			Guarantor		Consolidation/
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	801		$	818		$	22	$	(751	)	$	890
Cost of sales		816			827			21		(751	)		913
Selling, general and administrative expenses		57			1			—		—			58
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		12			(1	)		—		(11	)		—
Interest expense		89			3			—		—			92
Other (income) expense, net		1			(1	)		—		—			—


Income (loss) before income taxes		(174	)		(11	)		1		11			(173	)
Income tax (benefit)		—			1			—		—			1


Net income (loss)	$	(174	)	$	(12	)	$	1	$	11		$	(174	)

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FIRST HALF ENDED JUNE 30, 2010


							Non-
	NewPage			Guarantor			Guarantor		Consolidation/
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	1,533		$	1,576		$	43	$	(1,445	)	$	1,707
Cost of sales		1,568			1,597			42		(1,445	)		1,762
Selling, general and administrative expenses		106			1			—		—			107
Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries		39			(1	)		—		(38	)		—
Interest expense		182			7			—		—			189
Other (income) expense, net		(13	)		10			—		—			(3	)


Income (loss) before income taxes		(349	)		(38	)		1		38			(348	)
Income tax (benefit)		—			1			—		—			1


Net income (loss)	$	(349	)	$	(39	)	$	1	$	38		$	(349	)

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011

	NewPageCorporation			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiaries		Consolidation/Eliminations		Consolidated
							Non-
	NewPage			Guarantor			Guarantor		Consolidation/
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations		Consolidated
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	$	—(38	)	$	1935		$	1	$	—	$	20(2	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(1	)		(1332	)		—		—		(1433	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		—			111			—		—		111
Expenditures for Port Hawkesbury biomass project		—			(1019	)		—		—		(1019	)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities		(1	)		(2240	)		—		—		(2341	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payment of financing costs		(1	)		—			—		—		(1	)
Borrowings on revolving credit facility		~~244~~582			—			—		—		~~244~~582
Payments on revolving credit facility		(~~242~~543	)		—			—		—		(~~242~~543	)
Proceeds from NSPI for Port Hawkesbury biomass project		—			25			—		—		25
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		138			25			—		—		343
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent		—			1			—		—		1
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		—(1	)		—1			1		—		1
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1			—			7		—		8
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1—		$	—1		$	8	$	—	$	9

2023

NEWPAGE CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FIRST ~~QUARTER~~HALF ENDED ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2010

	NewPageCorporation			GuarantorSubsidiaries			Non-GuarantorSubsidiary		Consolidation/Eliminations		Consolidated
							Non-
	NewPage			Guarantor			Guarantor		Consolidation/
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations		Consolidated
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	$	3(143	)	$	(914	)	$	2	$	—	$	(4127	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(23	)		(928	)		—		—		(1131	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		—			1112			—		—		1112
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities		(2	)		2			—		—		—
Other investing activities		—			(1	)		—		—		(1	)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities		(3	)		(17	)		—		—		(20	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		67			—			—		—		67
Payment of financing costs		(4	)		—			—		—		(4	)
Borrowings on revolving credit facility		~~124~~442			—			—		—		~~124~~442
Payments on revolving credit facility		(~~176~~358	)		—			—		—		(~~176~~358	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		11147			—			—		—		11147
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent		—			12			—		—		12
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		121			(61	)		2		—		82
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1			—			4		—		5
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	132		$	(61	)	$	6	$	—	$	137

2124

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Company Background

We believe that we are the largest coated paper manufacturer in North America based on production capacity. Coated paper is used primarily in media and marketing applications, such as high-end advertising brochures, direct mail advertising, coated labels, magazines, magazine covers and inserts, catalogues and textbooks. We operate paper mills located in Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Nova Scotia, Canada.

Trends in Our Business

North American coated paper demand is primarily driven by advertising and print media usage. In particular, the demand for certain grades of coated paper is affected by spending on catalogue and promotional materials by retailers and spending on magazine advertising, which affects the number of printed pages in magazines. During the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011, North American coated paper demand was ~~flat~~ lower compared to the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010. In February 2011, we realigned our capacity needs with the closure of our Whiting, Wisconsin mill and we did not take any market-related downtime in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011. We took 39,000 tons of market-related downtime in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010. We will consider the need for additional market-related downtime from time to time based on market conditions.

Coated paper production capacity in North America was lower during the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011 compared to the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010, primarily as a result of North American capacity closures, including the closure of our Whiting, Wisconsin mill in February 2011. We believe imports continue to affect the North American market, placing downward pressure on North American coated paper prices as a result of foreign overcapacity.

North American prices for coated paper products historically have been determined more by North American supply and demand than directly by raw material costs or other costs of sales. However, we believe that the announced capacity closures in coated papers and inflationary trends in producer input costs may put upward pressure on prices for our products. As a result, we expect average prices for coated paper in the ~~last~~second ~~three~~half ~~quarters~~ of 2011 to be higher than the ~~last~~second ~~three~~half ~~quarters~~ of 2010.

We experienced significant increases in our input costs during the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011 compared to the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010, due to higher prices for wood, chemicals and purchased pulp. In particular, costs of certain petroleum-based chemicals and transportation costs have increased during the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011 compared to the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010, principally as a result of increases in the price of crude oil. Because of the lag time between the change in oil prices and the change in costs of certain petroleum-based chemicals, we anticipate this trend will continue throughout 2011. Overall, we expect crude oil and energy costs to remain volatile for the foreseeable future.

Port Hawkesbury Biomass Project

On November 3, 2010, NewPage Port Hawkesbury Corp. (“NPPH”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of NewPage, completed the sale of certain assets, including a boiler and land at the Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia mill, to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (“NSPI”) for a cash sales price of $79 million. In addition, NSPI and NPPH have entered into an engineering, procurement and construction contract for NPPH to construct for NSPI a 60 MW biomass cogeneration utility plant for the generation of electricity by

2225

December 31, 2012 for approximately C$93 million. All costs of construction up to C$93 million will be paid or reimbursed by NSPI. NSPI and NPPH also entered into a management, operations and maintenance agreement related to NPPH operating the utility assets for and under the control of NSPI for an initial period of 25 years plus the period prior to completion of the turbine, with three automatic five-year renewal terms, unless notice of termination is given. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

Whiting Mill Closure

During the first quarter of 2011, we permanently closed our Whiting, Wisconsin mill. Approximately 360 employees at the facility were affected. We made the decision to close the facility in order to better align capacity with market demand. As a result of this action, including the evaluation of capacity needs, during the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded asset impairment charges for the Whiting mill and the previously-closed Kimberly mill of $196 million in other (income) expense and classified these assets as held for sale. During the ~~fourth quarter of 2010 and~~ first ~~quarter~~half of 2011, we recognized $~~2 million and $~~5 million of employee-related costs recorded in cost of sales. In addition, during the ~~first~~second quarter and first half of 2011, we recognized $21 million and $3 million in cost of sales for contract termination and other closure related costs and we expect to recognize additional charges in cost of sales of approximately $1514 million ~~to $20 million~~ for contract termination and other closure related costs during 2011 and subsequent years as contract terms expire. The facility closure and related activities ~~are~~have ~~expected~~been ~~to be~~ substantially completed during the first half of 2011. The severance and other closure cost require the outlay of cash while the asset impairment charge represents a non-cash charge. ~~We expect no material effect on future earnings or cash flows as a result of the Whiting mill closure.~~

Results of Operations

The following ~~table~~tables ~~sets~~set forth our historical results of operations for the ~~first~~second quarter and first half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010. The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report. All assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows presented for all periods represent those of NewPage Holding’s wholly-owned subsidiary, NewPage, except for NewPage Holding’s debt and equity activity and income tax effects. Unless otherwise noted, the information provided pertains to both NewPage Holding and NewPage.

23Second Quarter 2011 Compared to Second Quarter 2010


	NewPage Holding
	Second Quarter Ended June 30,
	2011						2010
(in millions)	$			%			$			%
Net sales		888			100.0			890			100.0
Cost of sales		887			99.9			913			102.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses		36			4.1			58			6.5
Interest expense		100			11.3			97			10.8
Other (income) expense, net		1			0.2			—			—

Income (loss) before income taxes		(136	)		(15.5	)		(178	)		(20.0	)
Income tax (benefit)		—			—			1			0.1

Net income (loss)		(136	)		(15.5	)		(179	)		(20.1	)


Supplemental Information
Adjusted EBITDA	$	32					$	10

~~First~~Net ~~Quarter~~sales for the second quarter of 2011 ~~Compared~~were $888 million compared to ~~First~~$890 ~~Quarter~~million for the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of $2 million or less than 1%. The decrease was primarily the result of lower sales volume of core paper ($74 million), partially offset by higher average core paper prices ($50 million) and higher sales volume and average prices of other non-core paper in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010. Core volume is principally coated freesheet, coated groundwood and supercalendered paper products sold in North America. Average core paper prices increased to $925 per ton in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $852 per ton in the second quarter of 2010. Core paper sales volume decreased to 774,000 tons in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 868,000 tons in the second quarter of 2010. We did not take any market-related downtime during the second quarter of 2011 or 2010. We will consider the need for additional downtime from time to time based on market conditions.

	NewPage Holding
	First Quarter Ended Mar. 31,
	2011						2010
(in millions)	$			%			$			%
Net sales		904			100.0			817			100.0
Cost of sales		858			94.9			849			103.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses		40			4.5			49			6.1
Interest expense		100			11.0			101			12.4
Other (income) expense, net		(2	)		(0.3	)		(3	)		(0.5	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(92	)		(10.1	)		(179	)		(21.9	)
Income tax (benefit)		1			0.1			—			—
Net income (loss)		(93	)		(10.2	)		(179	)		(21.9	)
Supplemental Information
Adjusted EBITDA	$	85					$	15

Cost of sales for the second quarter of 2011 was $887 million compared to $913 million for the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of $26 million, or 3%. The decrease was primarily a result of lower core paper sales volume ($65 million), partially offset by inflation on input costs and increased maintenance expense, as a result of required planned major maintenance. In addition, during the second quarter of 2011, in connection with the closure of the Whiting mill, we recognized charges of $1 million for contractual termination and other closure related costs in cost of sales. During the second quarter of 2010, we took actions to reduce personnel as part of our cost reduction initiatives and recognized a charge of $4 million for employee-related costs in cost of sales. Gross margin (loss) for the second quarter of 2011 was 0.1% compared to (2.7)% for the second quarter of 2010. This improvement was primarily driven by higher average core paper sale prices ($50 million), partially offset by inflation on input costs during second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Also, during the second quarter of 2011, we were unable to operate our Wickliffe mill for 21 days as a result of the Mississippi river flooding, which had a negative impact of approximately $7 million.

~~Net~~Maintenance ~~sales~~expense ~~for~~at ~~the~~our ~~first quarter of 2011 were $904 million compared to $817 million for the first quarter of 2010,~~mills antotaled ~~increase of~~ $8791 million ~~or 11%. The increase was primarily the result of higher sales volume of core paper ($35 million)~~ and ~~higher average core paper prices (~~$4286 million) in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 ~~compared~~and ~~to the first quarter of~~ 2010. ~~Core volume~~We isexpect ~~principally coated freesheet, coated groundwood and supercalendered paper products sold in North America. Average core paper prices increased~~ to ~~$912~~incur ~~per~~higher ~~ton~~maintenance inexpense during the ~~first~~third quarter of 2011 compared to ~~$858 per ton in~~ the ~~first~~same ~~quarter~~period ~~of 2010. Core paper sales volume increased to 829,000 tons~~ in ~~the first quarter of 2011 compared to 792,000 tons in the first quarter of~~ 2010~~. In February 2011~~, weas ~~realigned~~a ~~our~~result ~~capacity needs with the closure~~ of ~~our~~required ~~Whiting,~~planned ~~Wisconsin~~major ~~mill and we did not take any market-related downtime in the first quarter of 2011~~maintenance. ~~We took 39,000 tons of market-related downtime in the first quarter of 2010. We will consider the need for additional downtime from time to time based on market conditions.~~

~~Cost~~Selling, ofgeneral ~~sales~~and administrative expenses decreased to $36 million for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 ~~was~~from $~~858~~58 million ~~compared to $849 million~~ for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010, anprimarily ~~increase~~as a result of $9 12 million orlower ~~1%.~~non-cash ~~The~~stock ~~increase~~compensation ~~was~~expense, ~~primarily~~benefits ~~the~~from ~~result~~cost ofreduction ~~higher~~initiatives ~~core~~and ~~paper~~lower ~~sales~~pension ~~volume~~expense ~~($27 million)~~ partially offset by ~~lower~~higher ~~sales~~costs ~~volumes~~associated with the services of ~~non-core~~several ~~paper.~~advisors Inassisting us ~~addition,~~in ~~during~~exploring various ~~the~~restructuring ~~first~~alternatives. ~~quarter~~In ofaddition, ~~2011~~selling, ingeneral ~~connection~~and ~~with~~administrative ~~the~~expenses ~~closure~~for of the ~~Whiting~~ ~~mill,~~second wequarter ~~recognized~~of ~~charges~~2010, ofincluded $56 million ~~for~~in employee-related costs, ~~and~~primarily $2associated ~~million~~with ~~for~~certain ~~contractual~~former ~~termination~~executive officers. ~~and~~As ~~other~~a ~~closure~~percentage ~~related~~of ~~costs.~~net ~~Gross~~sales, ~~margin~~selling, ~~(loss)~~general ~~for~~and administrative expenses improved in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 ~~was~~to 54.1% ~~compared~~from ~~to (3~~6.9)5% ~~for the first quarter of 2010 primarily as a result of higher average core paper sales prices ($42 million)~~ in the ~~first~~second quarter of ~~2011~~2010.

~~Maintenance~~ Interest expense atfor ~~our~~the ~~mills~~second ~~totaled~~quarter of 2011 was $72100 million ~~and~~compared to $7197 million infor the ~~first~~second quarter of ~~2011 and~~ 2010. WeInterest ~~expect~~expense tofor ~~incur~~NewPage ~~significantly~~for ~~higher maintenance expense during~~ the second ~~and~~quarter ~~third quarters~~ of 2011 was $96 million compared to ~~the~~$92 million ~~same~~for ~~periods~~the insecond ~~2010,~~quarter ~~as a result~~ of ~~required planned major maintenance~~2010.

~~Selling,~~Other ~~general~~(income) ~~and~~expense ~~administrative~~was ~~expenses decreased to~~ $401 million for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 from $49 million for the first quarter of 2010, primarily as a result of $8 million lower stock compensation expense. Included in the amount of equity award expense for the first quarter of 2010 is $6 million to reflect the effects of a modification on the vested time-based options and ~~the vesting of the prior-year unearned performance-based options. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in the first quarter of 2011 to 4.5% from 6.1%~~zero infor the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010.

24Income tax expense (benefit) for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was zero and $1 million. For the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, we recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax benefit for federal income taxes and for certain states as it was more likely than not that we would not realize those benefits.

~~Interest~~Net ~~expense~~income ~~for~~(loss) was $(136) million in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 ~~was $100 million~~ compared to $~~101~~ (179) million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~ second quarter of 2010. ~~Interest~~Net ~~expense~~income (loss) for NewPage ~~for~~was $(132) million in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 ~~was $95 million~~ compared to $97 (174) million ~~for~~in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010. The improvements were primarily the result of higher average paper prices and cost reductions partially offset by inflation on input costs.

~~Other~~Adjusted ~~(income)~~EBITDA ~~expense~~ was $~~(2)~~32 million for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2011 ~~and~~compared ~~$(3)~~to $10 million for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2010. ~~The~~See ~~amount~~“Reconciliation ~~recognized~~of inNet ~~the~~Income ~~first~~(Loss) ~~quarter~~to ofEBITDA ~~2010~~and ~~includes~~Adjusted ~~$11~~EBITDA” ~~million~~for offurther ~~net~~information ~~loss~~ on ~~disposal~~ ~~and~~the ~~impairment~~use of ~~assets,~~EBITDA ~~offset~~and byAdjusted ~~$(13)~~EBITDA ~~million~~as ofmeasurement ~~(income) recognized for alternative fuel mixture tax credits~~tools.

~~Income~~First ~~tax expense~~Half ~~(benefit) for the first quarter of~~ 2011 ~~and~~Compared ~~2010~~to ~~was~~First $1Half ~~million and zero. For the first quarter of 2011 and~~ 2010, ~~we recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax benefit for federal income taxes and for certain states as it was more likely than not that we would not realize those benefits.~~

Net income (loss) was $(93) million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $(179) million in the first quarter of 2010. Net income (loss) for NewPage was $(88) million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $(175) million in the first quarter of 2010. The improvements were primarily the result of higher average paper prices and higher sales volume of core paper.


	NewPage Holding
	First Half Ended June 30,
	2011						2010
(in millions)	$			%			$			%
Net sales		1,792			100.0			1,707			100.0
Cost of sales		1,745			97.4			1,762			103.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses		76			4.3			107			6.3
Interest expense		200			11.2			198			11.6
Other (income) expense, net		(1	)		(0.1	)		(3	)		(0.2	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(228	)		(12.8	)		(357	)		(20.9	)
Income tax (benefit)		1			0.1			1			0.1

Net income (loss)		(229	)		(12.9	)		(358	)		(21.0	)


Supplemental Information
Adjusted EBITDA	$	117					$	25

~~Adjusted~~Net ~~EBITDA~~sales ~~was $85 million~~ for the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011 were $1,792 million compared to $15 1,707 million for the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010, an increase of $85 million or 5%. ~~See~~The ~~“Reconciliation~~increase was primarily the result of ~~Net~~higher ~~Income~~average core paper prices (~~Loss~~$92 million) and higher average other non-core paper prices, partially offset by lower sales volume of core paper ($39 million) in the first half of 2011 compared to ~~EBITDA~~the ~~and~~first ~~Adjusted~~half ~~EBITDA”~~of ~~for~~2010. ~~further~~Average ~~information~~core onpaper prices increased to $918 per ton in the ~~use~~first half of ~~EBITDA~~2011 compared to $855 per ton in the first half of 2010. Core paper sales volume decreased to 1,603,000 tons in the first half of 2011 compared to 1,660,000 tons in the first half of 2010. In February 2011, we realigned our capacity needs with the closure of our Whiting, Wisconsin mill and ~~Adjusted~~we ~~EBITDA~~did asnot ~~measurement~~take ~~tools~~any market-related downtime in the first half of 2011. We took 39,000 tons of market-related downtime in the first half of 2010.

Cost of sales for the first half of 2011 was $1,745 million compared to $1,762 million for the first half of 2010, a decrease of $17 million or 1%. The decrease was primarily the result of lower core paper sales volume ($38 million), partially offset by inflation on input costs and increased maintenance expense as a result of required planned major maintenance. In addition, during the first half of 2011, in connection with the closure of the Whiting mill, we recognized charges of $5 million for employee-related costs and $3 million for contractual termination and other closure related costs in cost of sales. During the second quarter of 2010, we took actions to reduce personnel as part of our cost reduction initiatives and recognized a charge of $4 million for employee-related costs in cost of sales. Gross margin (loss) for the first half of 2011 was 2.6% compared to (3.2)% for the first half of 2010. This improvement was primarily driven by higher average core paper sales prices ($92 million) partially offset by inflation on input costs during the first half of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Also, during the second quarter of 2011, we were unable to operate our Wickliffe mill for 21 days as a result of the Mississippi river flooding, which had a negative impact of approximately $7 million.

Maintenance expense at our mills totaled $163 million and $157 million in the first half of 2011 and 2010. We expect to incur higher maintenance expense during the second half of 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010, as a result of required planned major maintenance.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $76 million for the first half of 2011 from $107 million for the first half of 2010, primarily as a result of $20 million lower non-cash stock compensation expense, benefits from cost reduction initiatives and lower pension expense partially offset by higher costs associated with the services of several advisors assisting us in exploring various restructuring alternatives. In addition, selling, general and administrative expenses for the first half of 2010 included $6 million in employee-related costs primarily associated with certain former executive officers. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses improved in the first half of 2011 to 4.3% from 6.3% in the first half of 2010.

Interest expense for the first half of 2011 was $200 million compared to $198 million for the first half of 2010. Interest expense for NewPage for the first half of 2011 was $191 million compared to $189 million for the first half of 2010.

Other (income) expense was $(1) million for the first half of 2011 and $(3) million for the first half of 2010. The amount recognized in the first half of 2010 includes $11 million of net loss on disposal and impairment of assets, offset by $(13) million of (income) recognized for alternative fuel mixture tax credits.

Income tax expense (benefit) for the first half of 2011 and 2010 was $1 million and $1 million. For the first half of 2011 and 2010, we recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax benefit for federal income taxes and for certain states as it was more likely than not that we would not realize those benefits.

Net income (loss) was $(229) million in the first half of 2011 compared to $(358) million in the first half of 2010. Net income (loss) for NewPage was $(220) million in the first half of 2011 compared to $(349) million in the first half of 2010. The improvements were primarily the result of higher average paper prices and cost reductions partially offset by inflation on input costs.

Adjusted EBITDA was $117 million for the first half of 2011 compared to $25 million for the first half of 2010. See “Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA” for further information on the use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as measurement tools.

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our performance under U.S. GAAP, are not intended to represent net income (loss), and should not be used as alternatives to net income (loss) as indicators of performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are shown because they are bases upon which our management assesses performance and are primary components of certain covenants under our revolving credit facility. In addition, our management believes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful to investors because they and similar measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies with substantial financial leverage. The use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA instead of net income (loss) has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our current cash expenditure requirements, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments

•

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs

•

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt

•

although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements

•

our measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation

Because of these limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as discretionary cash available to us to reinvest in the growth of our business.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

	NewPageHolding
	NewPage Holding
	First QuarterEnded Mar. 31,
	Second Quarter						First Half
(in millions)	2011			2010
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
Net income (loss)	$	(93	)	$	(179	)
(in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest expense		100			101
Net income (loss)	$	(136	)	$	(179	)	$	(229	)	$	(358	)
Income tax (benefit)		1			—
Interest expense		100			97			200			198
Depreciation and amortization		62			68
Income tax (benefit)		—			1			1			1
EBITDA		70			(10	)
Depreciation and amortization		59			67			121			135
Equity awards		—			8
EBITDA		23			(14	)		93			(24	)
(Gain) loss on disposal and impairment of assets		1			6
Equity awards		(1	)		11			(1	)		19
Non-cash U.S. pension expense		6			9
(Gain) loss on disposal and impairment of assets		4			2			5			8
Integration and related severance costs		8			2
Non-cash U.S. pension expense		3			8			9			17
Adjusted EBITDA	$	85		$	15
Integration and related severance costs		3			2			11			4
Other		—			1			—			1
Adjusted EBITDA	$	32		$	10		$	117		$	25

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (ASU 2011-04) . The amendments in this ASU clarifies the application of existing guidance and disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements, particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for us as of January 1, 2012 and is to be applied on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Available Liquidity

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from operating activities and availability under our revolving credit facility. The amount of borrowings and letters of credit available to NewPage pursuant to the revolving credit facility is limited to the lesser of $500 million or an amount determined by reference to a borrowing base ($~~416~~409 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011). Under the revolving credit facility, $30 million of the $500 million commitment matures on October 3, 2011, rather than December 21, 2012, as a result of not refinancing our Second-Lien Notes by July 4, 2011. However, our borrowing base would have to exceed $470 million before this would affect availability under the revolving credit facility.

In January 2011, we amended our revolving credit facility to extend its termination date. For those lenders who accepted this amendment (aggregating to $470 million), the revolving credit facility matures on December 21, 2012, unless we do not repay or refinance our floating rate and 10% second-lien senior secured notes (“Second-Lien Notes”) by December 2, 2011, in which case the revolving credit facility matures on March 1, 2012. ~~For~~As ~~the remaining $30 million~~ of ~~commitment, the revolving credit facility matures on December~~June ~~21, 2012 unless we do not repay or refinance our Second-Lien Notes by July 4, 2011, in which case the $~~30 ~~million portion of the revolving credit facility matures on October 3~~, 2011~~. As of March 31~~, ~~2011,~~ we had $~~161~~127 million available for borrowing in excess of the $50 million required minimum, after reduction for $~~110~~101 million in letters of credit and $95131 million in outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. During the first ~~quarter~~ half of 2011, our average daily balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility was $8185 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 4.64%.

26As of June 30, 2011, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $2,502 million. This deficit results from the classification of our First-Lien Notes, our Second-Lien Notes, and our revolving credit facility as current liabilities. We have retained advisors to assist us in exploring various restructuring alternatives and are engaged in discussions with various stakeholders to address our ongoing capital needs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, or that we will be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to refinance our debt or generate sufficient cash flow to service our obligations, we will be required to seek to restructure our existing debt or to voluntarily seek, or be forced to seek, protection under the Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and applicable Canadian laws. Any such actions would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, the value of the outstanding debt and our ability to make required cash payments under our indebtedness.

2012, the First-Lien Notes would mature on March 31, 2012. The senior subordinated notes mature on May 1, 2013. The NewPage Holding PIK Notes mature on November 1, 2013. Aggregate indebtedness as of March 31, 2011 totaled $3,475 million, which includes $3,247 million at NewPage.

As of March 31, 2011, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $1,378 million. This deficit is driven by the classification of our First-Lien Notes and our revolving credit facility as current liabilities. Absent a refinancing of our Second-Lien Notes, an additional $1,030 million will become current during the second quarter of 2011. We are exploring various alternatives to address our ongoing capital needs. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, or that we will be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Nor can we assure you that these measures will be sufficient to satisfy our scheduled debt service obligations, or that we will be able to fund our business and operations without additional capital. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or refinance our debt, including our revolving credit facility which is a principal source of our liquidity, prior to the scheduled maturities, it would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, the value of the outstanding debt and our ability to make required cash payments under our indebtedness.

Cash Flows

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities was $20(2) million during the first ~~quarter~~half of 2011 compared to $(4127) million during the first ~~quarter~~half of 2010, primarily ~~the~~as a result of improvements in operations, ~~including higher sales volume of core paper~~ and ~~higher average~~working ~~paper prices~~capital. Investing activities in first ~~quarter~~half of 2011 include $1433 million for capital expenditures, ~~and~~ $1019 million of expenditures for the Port Hawkesbury biomass project. and $11 million in proceeds from the sale of assets. Financing activities primarily consisted of borrowings and payments on the revolving credit facility and proceeds received for the Port Hawkesbury biomass project.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures were $1433 million and $1131 million for the first ~~quarter~~half ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010.

Financial Discussion

During the ~~fourth~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011, we ~~announced~~permanently ~~the~~closed ~~permanent closure~~our ~~of the~~ Whiting, Wisconsin mill ~~by the end of February 2011~~. As a result of this action, during the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded asset impairment charges for the Whiting mill and the previously-closed Kimberly mill of $196 million in other (income) expense and classified these assets as held for sale. During the ~~fourth quarter of 2010 and~~ first ~~quarter~~half of 2011, we recognized $~~2 million and $~~5 million of employee-related costs recorded in cost of sales. In addition, during the ~~first~~ second quarter and first half of 2011, we recognized $21 million and $3 million in cost of sales for contract termination and other closure related costs and we expect to recognize additional charges in cost of sales of approximately $1514 million ~~to $20 million~~ for contract termination and other closure related costs during 2011 and subsequent years as contract terms expire.

In March 2011, Rumford Paper Company (“Rumford”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NewPage ~~Corporation~~, and Rumford Cogeneration Company Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of Rumford, both indirect subsidiaries of NewPage Holding ~~Corporation~~, entered into an Asset Sale Agreement for the sale of Rumford’s cogeneration energy assets to ReEnergy Rumford LLC (“ReEnergy”) for a sale price of $61 million, payable one-half in cash at closing and one-half in the form of a 10-year note receivable. The transaction also contemplates an ongoing contractual relationship between the parties, pursuant to which Rumford will supply biomass fuel to ReEnergy and ReEnergy will supply electricity and thermal energy to Rumford. The transaction is not expected to have a material effect on the operating costs of the Rumford mill. We plan to invest the net cash proceeds in our business or use the proceeds to repay indebtedness, or both, in accordance with the terms of our debt instruments. The transaction is subject to various conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and the finalization of agreements outlined in term sheets. It is uncertain whether or when this transaction will close, as certain conditions to closing the transaction may not be satisfied. We are exploring options to address these conditions.

indebtedness, or both, in accordance with the terms of our debt instruments. The transaction, which is expected to close during the second or third quarter of 2011, is subject to customary conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and the finalization of agreements outlined in term sheets.

On November 3, 2010, NPPH completed the sale of certain assets, including a boiler and land at the Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia mill, to NSPI for a cash sales price of $79 million. In addition, NSPI and NPPH have entered into an engineering, procurement and construction contract for NPPH to construct for NSPI a 60 MW biomass cogeneration utility plant for the generation of electricity by December 31, 2012 for approximately C$93 million. NSPI and NPPH also entered into a management, operations and maintenance agreement related to NPPH operating the utility assets for NSPI. NPPH was required to post $10 million of letters of credit under these arrangements in 2010 and an additional $5 million in 2011. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

In32 February 2010, CWPCo announced that it signed an agreement with Wisconsin Rapids Water Works Lighting Commission to sell the CWPCo Utility, as amended. The purchase price will be equal to the net book value of the assets at the time of closing, subject to adjustment in the agreement. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals. On November 1, 2010, CWPCo entered into an asset sale agreement to sell five hydroelectric projects to Great Lakes Utilities for a net cash sales price of approximately $70 million. The closing of the transaction is subject to completion of the CWPCo Utility sale and regulatory approval. We continue to hold and operate the assets in the normal course of our operations.

In February 2010, CWPCo announced that it signed an agreement with Wisconsin Rapids Water Works Lighting Commission to sell the CWPCo Utility, as amended. The purchase price will be equal to the net book value of the assets at the time of closing, subject to adjustment in the agreement. The transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals. It is uncertain whether or when this transaction will close, as certain conditions to closing the transaction may not be satisfied. We are exploring options to address these conditions. On November 1, 2010, CWPCo entered into an asset sale agreement to sell five hydroelectric projects to Great Lakes Utilities for a net cash sales price of approximately $70 million. The closing of the transaction is subject to completion of the CWPCo Utility sale and regulatory approval. We continue to hold and use the assets in the normal course of our operations.

On March 21, 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) finalized its Boiler MACT rule, which provides for Industrial Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants for industrial, commercial and institutional boilers and process heaters. Compliance with the final Boiler MACT rule is currently required no later than March 21, 2014. Our preliminary evaluation of the final Boiler MACT rule indicates significant capital expenditures for additional emission control equipment may be needed at our mills with solid fuel boilers to comply with the rule. In addition, our mills will incur increased operating expenses associated with compliance and operation of the new control equipment. USEPA has also announced they will be reconsidering portions of the Boiler MACT rule because the final rule differs from what was proposed. At this time it is not known what changes to the rule might occur as a result of the reconsideration process. We continue to follow the reconsideration process and will adjust our Boiler MACT compliance evaluation as needed for any changes to the compliance requirements.

We have various investments held by our defined-benefit pension plan trusts. The returns on these assets have generally matched the broader market. We are monitoring the effects of our underfunded pension plans on our minimum pension funding requirements and pension expense for future periods. We currently do not anticipate material increases in our minimum funding requirements during 2011.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $~~548~~588 million and $541 million of our debt consisted of borrowings with variable interest rates. If market interest rates increase, variable-rate debt will create higher debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our cash flow or compliance with our debt covenants. The potential annual increase in interest expense resulting from a 100 basis point increase in quoted interest rates on our debt balances outstanding at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, would be $6 million and $5 million.

Foreign Currency Risk

Our Canadian subsidiary makes a portion of its purchases and sales in U.S. dollars. As a result, it is subject to transaction exposures that arise from foreign exchange movements between the date that the foreign currency transaction is recorded and the date it is consummated. Foreign currency exchange contracts may be used periodically to manage the variability in cash flows and revenues from the forecasted payment or receipt of currencies other than our functional currency, the U.S. dollar. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain a system of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly recorded and summarized so that reliable financial records and reports can be prepared and assets safeguarded. In addition, a system of disclosure controls is maintained to ensure that information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner to management responsible for the preparation and reporting of our financial information.

Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief accounting officer, assessed the disclosure control systems as being effective as they encompass material matters for the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. To the best of our knowledge, there were no changes in the internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, or USEPA, conducted a Clean Air Act investigation at the Escanaba Paper Company mill from September 2009 through early October 2009. USEPA delivered draft findings of violations to Escanaba Paper Company in September 2010 (Finding of Violation EPA-5-10-MI-0). USEPA requested discussions concerning the allegations, which have resulted in the elimination of several of the allegations. In July 2011, USEPA and Escanaba Paper Company commenced discussions regarding fines and penalties concerning the remaining allegations.

In September 2009, NewPage, along with two other U.S. paper producers and the United Steelworkers Union, filed antidumping and countervailing duty petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission alleging that manufacturers of certain coated paper in China and Indonesia are dumping their products in the United States and that these manufacturers have been subsidized by their governments in violation of U.S. trade laws. Following affirmative final determinations by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Commerce imposed duties to offset the threat of dumping and government subsidies. Producers in China and Indonesia have appealed these determinations to the U.S. Court of International Trade. Pending a decision on the appeal, these duties will remain in effect for five years, subject to annual administrative reviews.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

~~Resignation~~On ~~and~~August 12, 2011, ~~Election~~NewPage and David J. Prystash agreed upon the terms of ~~Director~~a settlement agreement regarding his employment agreement dated September 8, 2008, as amended, with NewPage. NewPage shall pay $600,000 in return for a full release from Mr. Prystash.

On34 May 10, 2011, the boards of directors of NewPage Group Inc., NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (collectively, the “NewPage Companies”) accepted the resignation of Robert L. Nardelli from the boards of directors of the NewPage Companies, effective as of May 10, 2011. There were no disagreements between Mr. Nardelli and the NewPage Companies that resulted in Mr. Nardelli’s resignation.

On May 10, 2011, the boards of directors of the NewPage Companies elected Thomas L. Zambelli to serve as a director of the NewPage Companies, effective May 10, 2011. Since August 2007, Mr. Zambelli, age 60, has been a vice president of Cerberus Operating and Advisory Company LLC, an affiliate of the indirect controlling stockholder of the NewPage Companies. From March 2009 to May 2010, he was the chief investment officer of Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC. From April 2000 to August 2007 he was a senior director at Zolfo Cooper LLC, a financial advisory firm.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

ExhibitNumber		Description
10.1		~~Asset~~Employment ~~Sale~~ Agreement dated ~~March~~as ~~16,~~of ~~2011,~~June ~~among Rumford Paper Company~~3, ~~Rumford~~2011 ~~Cogeneration~~between ~~Company~~NewPage ~~Limited~~Corporation ~~Partnership~~ and ~~ReEnergy~~Jay ~~Rumford~~A. ~~LLC~~Epstein
10.2		Settlement Agreement dated as of August 12, 2011 between NewPage Corporation and David J. Prystash
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

3135

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation have duly caused this Report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NEWPAGE HOLDING CORPORATION		NEWPAGE CORPORATION
By:	/s/ George F. Martin	By:	/s/ George F. Martin
George F. Martin		George F. Martin
President and Chief Executive Officer		President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 12, 2011		Date: May 12, 2011
Date: August 15, 2011		Date: August 15, 2011
By:	/s/ Ronald J. Arling	By:	/s/ Ronald J. Arling
Ronald J. Arling		Ronald J. Arling
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer		Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)		(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 12, 2011		Date: May 12, 2011
Date: August 15, 2011		Date: August 15, 2011

3236

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · NewPage Holding CORP