UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-16103

LOGO

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio		31-1263732
Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		31-1263732 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6600 Port Road, Groveport, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices)		43125 (Zip Code)
6600 Port Road, Groveport, Ohio		43125
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (614) 748-1150

No change

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last reports)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

On ~~July~~October 2625, 2011, the registrant had outstanding 7,~~871~~888,349 common shares without par value, which is the registrant’s only class of common equity.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1

ITEM 1 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			1

ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			11

ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			17

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION			18

ITEM 6 EXHIBITS			18

SIGNATURES			19

CERTIFICATIONS			20

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

	June 30,2011			December 31,2010
	September 30,2011			December 31,2010
ASSETS	(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	1,~~292~~529		$	465
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $109 and $106, respectively		4,~~784~~076			4,469
Inventory, net		23,~~698~~046			3,226
Deferred income taxes		~~806~~771			762
Other current assets		~~374~~425			492
Total current assets		9,~~954~~847			9,414
Property and equipment, net		~~934~~1,015			685
Goodwill		~~830~~767			767
Deferred income taxes		1,~~200~~224			929
Other assets		~~179~~105			193
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1312,~~097~~958		$	11,988
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Line of credit	$	—		$	273
Accounts payable		1,~~786~~707			1,404
Accrued wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits		~~552~~501			581
Unearned revenue		~~168~~101			30
Other current liabilities		~~576~~529			743
Total current liabilities		32,~~082~~838			3,031
Other liabilities		~~491~~449			296
TOTAL LIABILITIES		3,~~573~~287			3,327
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock; no par value; 4,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock; no par value; 25,000 shares authorized; 7,871 and 7,864 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		5,793			5,790
Common stock; no par value; 25,000 shares authorized; 7,888 and 7,864 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		5,802			5,790
Additional paid-in capital		2,~~000~~022			1,962
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(3101	)		(90	)
Retained earnings		1,~~734~~948			999
Total stockholders’ equity		9,~~524~~671			8,661
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	1312,~~097~~958		$	11,988

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share)

For the Three Months EndedJune 30,

For the Six Months EndedJune 30,

For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30,

For the Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,

2011

2010

2011

2010

Sales

6,~~821~~695

76,~~968~~314

1319,~~226~~921

1623,~~780~~094

Cost of sales

4,~~577~~479

54,~~733~~088

813,~~899~~378

1216,~~396~~484

Gross profit

2,~~244~~216

2,~~235~~226

46,~~327~~543

46,~~384~~610

Operating expenses

1,~~895~~981

1,~~835~~732

35,~~719~~700

35,~~563~~295

Income from operations

~~349~~235

~~400~~494

~~608~~843

~~821~~1,315

Other expense

Interest expense

—

184

4145

Income before income taxes

~~349~~235

~~382~~490

~~607~~842

~~780~~1,270

Income tax expense (benefit)

~~169~~21

82(1,183

)

(~~128~~107

)

~~171~~(1,012

)

Net income

~~180~~214

~~300~~1,673

~~735~~949

~~609~~2,282

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

Basic

7,~~867~~880

7,~~826~~842

7,~~866~~870

7,~~825~~831

Diluted

8,~~156~~125

78,~~966~~011

8,~~173~~116

7,~~891~~960

Earnings per common share:

Basic

0.0203

0.0421

0.0912

0.0829

Diluted

0.0203

0.0421

0.0912

0.0829

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Common Stock				AdditionalPaid-~~In Capital~~InCapital		AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)			RetainedEarnings(Deficit)			TotalStockholders’Equity
	OutstandingShares		Amount
Balance – December 31, 2009		7,825	$	5,769	$	1,912	$	(29	)	$	(2,064	)	$	5,588
Stock issued		1419		810		—		—			—			810
Share-based payment expense		—		—		2435		—			—			2435
Comprehensive income, net of taxes:
Net income		—		—		—		—			~~609~~2,282			~~609~~2,282
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		(~~140~~42	)		—			(~~140~~42	)
Total comprehensive income														~~469~~2,240
Balance – June 30, 2010		7,839	$	5,777	$	1,936	$	(169	)	$	(1,455	)	$	6,089
Balance – September 30, 2010		7,844	$	5,779	$	1,947	$	(71	)	$	218		$	7,873
Balance – December 31, 2010		7,864	$	5,790	$	1,962	$	(90	)	$	999		$	8,661
Stock issued		724		312		—		—			—			312
Share-based payment expense		—		—		3860		—			—			3860
Comprehensive income, net of taxes:
Net income		—		—		—		—			~~735~~949			~~735~~949
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		87(11	)		—			87(11	)
Total comprehensive income														~~822~~938
Balance – June 30, 2011		7,871	$	5,793	$	2,000	$	(3	)	$	1,734		$	9,524
Balance – September 30, 2011		7,888	$	5,802	$	2,022	$	(101	)	$	1,948		$	9,671

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	For the Six Months EndedJune 30,
	For the Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	~~735~~949		$	~~609~~2,282
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		2829			(3219	)
Inventory reserves		~~132~~124			~~135~~246
Depreciation and amortization		~~174~~273			~~201~~298
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes		(~~315~~304	)		—(1,037	)
Share-based payment expense		3860			2434
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable		~~(299~~353	)		~~953~~1,111
Inventory		~~410~~52			~~550~~113
Other assets		9893			~~202~~16
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		~~392~~196			(~~907~~956	)
Unearned revenue		~~138~~71			~~195~~62
Other liabilities		(~~249~~338	)		(~~233~~357	)
Total adjustments		~~547~~609			~~1,088~~(489	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,~~282~~558			1,~~697~~793
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment		(~~176~~366	)		(22110	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~176~~366	)		(22110	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in line of credit		(273	)		(2,~~184~~076	)
Net change in outstanding checks		~~(45~~132	)		~~303~~136
Other		129			3659
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~306~~132	)		(1,~~845~~881	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE ON CASH		274			(181	)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		~~827~~1,064			(~~188~~199	)
Cash at beginning of period		465			323
Cash at end of period	$	1,~~292~~529		$	~~135~~124
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITY:
Acquisitions of equipment through capital lease	$	196		$	40

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2011 and 2010

1. Nature of Operations

Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (“PDSi” or the “Company”) is a global provider of electronics repair and reverse logistics services; system integration and original design manufacturer (“ODM”) computing design and manufacturing services; and embedded computing products and design services for the diversified computing, telecommunications, imaging, defense/aerospace, medical, semiconductor and industrial automation markets. PDSi provides a variety of engineering and manufacturing services for global original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) requiring custom product design, system integration, repair programs, warranty management, and/or specialized production capabilities. PDSi’s product capabilities range from board-level designs to globally certified, fully integrated systems, specializing in long-life computer products and unique, customer-centric solutions. The Company has facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia. The common shares of PDSi are traded on NYSE Amex under the stock symbol “PNS.”

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of PDSi have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The financial information included herein reflects all normal and recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations. Operating results for all periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes a complete summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies in Note 2. There have been no material changes to these policies since December 31, 2010.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. The Company’s most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventory, goodwill and income taxes. Although some variability is inherent in these estimates, recorded amounts reflect management’s best estimates based on available facts and circumstances at that time. Management believes the amounts provided are appropriate.

Consolidation Policy

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PDSi; ~~and~~ PDSi B.V., a wholly-owned private limited liability company located in Tiel, the Netherlands; and PDSi Singapore Pte. Ltd., a wholly-owned private limited liability company located in Singapore. All significant intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Inventory

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company provided reserves of $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of inventory. The following table summarizes the Company’s inventory as of the dates indicated (net of inventory reserves):

(in thousands)	~~June~~September 30,2011		December 31,2010
Component parts (raw materials)	$	2,~~368~~705	$	2,963
Work-in-process		~~210~~207		110
Finished goods		~~120~~134		153
Total inventory	$	23,~~698~~046	$	3,226

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued

~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010

3. Line of Credit

On March 24, 2011, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement and a Security Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), providing for a revolving credit facility (the “Line”) with a maximum line of credit of $3.0 million, subject to borrowing base restrictions. The borrowing base is determined as follows: 1) the sum of (a) 85% of the aggregate amount of eligible accounts receivable located within the United States, plus (b) 75% of the aggregate amount of eligible accounts receivable located outside of the United States, plus (c) the lesser of 10% of the aggregate amount of eligible inventory or $0.5 million.

The Line is evidenced by a Revolving Line of Credit Note made by the Company in favor of Wells Fargo, and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, as provided for in the Security Agreement. The Line is subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on the Company with respect to liens, indebtedness, guaranties, investments, mergers and dispositions of assets.

The Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants, including a maximum ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth, minimum net income on a rolling four-quarter basis, and a minimum debt service coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 30, 2011.

The outstanding balance on the Line bears interest monthly at a fluctuating annual rate of 3% above the Daily One Month London Interbank Offered Rate. The Line matures on March 22, 2013.

The Company may use borrowings under the Credit Agreement for general corporate purposes. Any unused portions of the Line will be subject to unused Line fees. Wells Fargo may terminate the Credit Agreement immediately upon default.

On March 24, 2011, in connection with entering into the Credit Agreement and Security Agreement described above, the Company terminated its prior line of credit agreement with Wells Fargo. The Company did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the prior line of credit agreement.

4. Income Taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign countries. There are no federal or state income tax examinations currently underway for these jurisdictions. Open tax years exist for 2007 and beyond for the Company’s federal income tax returns and for 2006 and beyond for state income tax returns.

The Company ~~maintains~~reviewed aits ~~$0.1~~net ~~million~~deferred ~~valuation~~tax ~~allowance~~assets ~~against~~as ~~deferred~~of ~~tax~~September 30, ~~assets~~2009 ~~related~~to assess the need to ~~certain~~establish ~~state~~a ~~net~~valuation ~~operating~~allowance ~~loss~~due ~~(“NOL”)~~to ~~carryforwards.~~the ~~The~~continuing uncertain economic environment and the Company’s ~~can~~pre-tax ~~provide~~loss nofor ~~assurance~~the nine months ended September 30, 2009. At that ~~changes~~time, inthe ~~its~~Company’s net deferred tax ~~asset~~assets ~~valuation~~primarily ~~allowance~~consisted ~~will~~of ~~not~~temporary bedifferences ~~required~~related into inventory ~~the~~reserves ~~future.~~and ~~The~~federal ~~Company~~net ~~will~~operating ~~continue~~loss to(“NOL”) ~~monitor~~carryforwards. ~~events~~Based on the Company’s analysis and ~~circumstances~~application toof ~~determine~~the ~~whether any~~GAAP ~~change~~framework, inthe ~~its~~Company established a valuation allowance isof ~~warranted~~$1.6 inmillion ~~the~~against ~~future~~its net deferred tax assets.

~~Although~~During the ~~Company~~third ~~periodically~~quarter ~~had~~of ~~considered the potential tax savings associated with pursuing research and development (“R&D”) tax credits~~2010, the Company’s ~~then~~concluded ~~recent~~that ~~operating~~its ~~losses,~~operations ~~combined~~had ~~with~~demonstrated ~~existing federal U.S. NOL carryforwards, precluded an economical pursuit of~~sustainable ~~such credits. However~~profitability, ~~based on positive changes in the Company’s operating results~~ and ~~financial~~that ~~position~~future intaxable ~~2010,~~income aswould ~~well~~more aslikely ~~the~~than ~~use~~not ofallow ~~existing~~for ~~NOL~~realization ~~carryforwards, management determined during the fourth quarter~~ of ~~2010 that the~~ benefits ~~would~~ ~~outweigh~~from ~~both~~existing ~~the~~deferred ~~cost~~income ~~of an R&D~~ tax ~~credit study and the establishment of the necessary infrastructure to be able to claim such credits in the future~~assets. Accordingly, the Company ~~recorded~~reversed asubstantially ~~net~~all ~~tax benefit~~ of ~~$0.5~~its ~~million~~deferred ~~during the fourth quarter of 2010 for estimated R&D~~ tax ~~credits~~asset ~~for~~valuation ~~tax~~allowance. As ~~years~~a ~~2001~~result, ~~through 2010 that~~ the ~~Company believed were more likely than not~~ year-to-date ~~be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service~~U.S. ~~The~~effective ~~Company~~tax ~~substantially~~rate ~~completed~~for the ~~calculation~~ ~~and~~third ~~documentation~~quarter of ~~these~~2010 ~~R&D~~was ~~tax~~approximately ~~credits~~34%, ~~during~~versus ~~the~~an ~~first~~effective ~~quarter~~rate of ~~2011,~~approximately ~~resulting~~22% applied in anthe ~~additional~~first ~~net~~six ~~tax~~months ~~benefit~~ of $02010.3 ~~million.~~The ~~During~~combined ~~the~~impact ~~second quarter~~ of ~~2011,~~ the ~~Company~~valuation ~~recorded~~allowance ~~net tax expense of $0.1 million~~reversal ~~associated~~and ~~with~~ the ~~finalization~~adjustment of the ~~amended~~year-to-date ~~federal~~U.S. ~~and~~effective ~~state~~ tax ~~returns~~rate ~~for~~resulted ~~prior~~in ~~years~~a ~~impacted~~$1.3 bymillion ~~the~~net ~~R&D~~non-cash ~~tax credit study~~benefit.

The Company maintains a ~~liability~~$0.1 ~~for~~million ~~unrecognized~~valuation ~~tax~~allowance ~~benefits~~against ~~related~~deferred ~~to R&D~~ tax ~~credit~~assets ~~positions~~related to becertain ~~taken~~state onNOL ~~its~~carryforwards. ~~various~~The ~~income~~Company ~~tax~~can ~~returns.~~provide Ifno ~~recognized,~~assurance ~~the~~that ~~entire~~changes ~~amount~~in ofits ~~these unrecognized~~deferred tax ~~benefits~~asset ~~would~~valuation ~~favorably~~allowance ~~impact~~will ~~the~~not ~~Company’s~~be ~~effective~~required ~~tax rate~~ in ~~future~~the ~~periods~~future. The Company ~~had~~will ~~$0.2~~continue ~~million~~to ~~and~~monitor ~~$0.1~~events ~~million~~and ofcircumstances ~~unrecognized~~to ~~tax~~determine ~~benefits~~whether asany ofchange ~~June 30,~~in ~~2011,~~its ~~and~~valuation ~~December 31,~~allowance ~~2010,~~is ~~respectively, which~~warranted ~~were recorded~~ in ~~other liabilities on~~ the ~~consolidated balance sheets~~future.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued

~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010

Although the Company periodically had considered the potential tax savings associated with pursuing research and development (“R&D”) tax credits, the Company’s then recent operating losses, combined with existing federal U.S. NOL carryforwards, precluded an economical pursuit of such credits. However, based on positive changes in the Company’s operating results and financial position in 2010, as well as the use of existing NOL carryforwards, management determined during the fourth quarter of 2010 that the benefits would outweigh both the cost of an R&D tax credit study and the establishment of the necessary infrastructure to be able to claim such credits in the future. Accordingly, the Company recorded a net tax benefit of $0.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2010 for estimated R&D tax credits for tax years 2001 through 2010 that the Company believed were more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company substantially completed the calculation and documentation of these R&D tax credits during the first quarter of 2011, resulting in an additional net tax benefit of $0.3 million. During the second and third quarters of 2011, the Company recorded net tax expense of $0.1 million and a net benefit of $0.1 million, respectively, associated with the finalization of the amended federal and state tax returns for prior years impacted by the R&D tax credit study.

The Company maintains a liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to R&D tax credit positions to be taken on its various income tax returns. If recognized, the entire amount of these unrecognized tax benefits would favorably impact the Company’s effective tax rate in future periods. The Company had $0.2 million and $0.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which were recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

The following table summarizes the Company’s income tax expense (benefit) for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended Sept. 30,						Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Current:
Federal	$	68(51	)	$	69(368	)	$	~~138~~87		$	~~136~~(1	)
Foreign		3051			1517			2879			1835
State and local		1310			(2	)		2131			17(9	)
Total current expense		~~111~~10			82(353	)		~~187~~197			~~171~~25
Deferred:
Federal		4737			—468			(~~345~~308	)		—286
Foreign		8(31	)		—			27(4	)		—
State and local		35			—133			38			—133
Total deferred expense (benefit)		58			—			(315	)		—
Valuation allowance		—			(1,431	)		—			(1,456	)
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	169		$	82		$	(128	)	$	171
Total deferred expense (benefit)		11			(830	)		(304	)		(1,037	)
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	21		$	(1,183	)	$	(107	)	$	(1,012	)

The following table reconciles tax expense (benefit) computed at the federal statutory rate to amounts reported for financial statement purposes for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended June 30,												Six months ended June 30,
	2011						2010						2011						2010
(dollars in thousands)	Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%
Income tax provision at statutory rate	$	118			34.0		$	130			34.0		$	206			34.0		$	265			34.0
R&D tax credits		—			—			—			—			(321	)		NM			—			—
R&D related tax impacts		69			19.7			—			—			69			11.4			—			—
Valuation allowance		—			—			(51	)		(13.3	)		—			—			(96	)		(12.3	)
Foreign rate differential		(27	)		(7.8	)		(11	)		(2.9	)		(39	)		(6.4	)		(13	)		(1.7	)
Other, net		9			2.5			14			3.7			(43	)		(7.1	)		15			1.9
Total	$	169			48.4		$	82			21.5		$	(128	)		NM		$	171			21.9

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company received federal tax refunds totaling $0.2 million, and state income tax payments were immaterial. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company received federal tax refunds totaling $0.2 million and made no state income tax payments. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had state NOL carryforwards of $4.2 million that will expire, if unused, between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2031. The Company had no federal NOL carryforwards as of June 30, 2011.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued

~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010

The following table reconciles tax expense (benefit) computed at the federal statutory rate to amounts reported for financial statement purposes for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended Sept. 30,												Nine months ended Sept. 30,
	2011						2010						2011						2010
(dollars in thousands)	Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%
Income tax provision at statutory rate	$	80			34.0		$	167			34.0		$	286			34.0		$	432			34.0
R&D tax credits		(8	)		(3.4	)		—			—			(329	)		NM			—			—
R&D related tax impacts		(56	)		(23.8	)		—			—			13			1.5			—			—
Valuation allowance		—			—			(1,431	)		NM			—			—			(1,456	)		NM
Foreign rate differential		(14	)		(6.0	)		(26	)		(5.3	)		(53	)		(6.3	)		(43	)		(3.4	)
Other, net		19			8.1			107			21.8			(24	)		(2.9	)		55			1.9

Total	$	21			8.9		$	(1,183	)		NM		$	(107	)		NM		$	(1,012	)		NM

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company received federal tax refunds totaling $0.3 million, and state income tax payments were immaterial. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company made federal tax payments of $0.2 million and received federal tax refunds totaling $0.3 million, and state income tax payments were immaterial. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had state NOL carryforwards of $3.9 million that will expire, if unused, between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2031. The Company had no federal NOL carryforwards as of September 30, 2011.

The following table summarizes the tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the Company’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	June 30,2011			December 31,2010
	September 30,			December 31,
(in thousands)	2011			2010
Deferred tax assets
R&D credits	$	1,~~021~~029		$	719
Inventory reserves		~~759~~745			714
Net operating loss		~~103~~99			107
Depreciation and amortization		77111			113
Other		~~185~~150			177
Gross deferred tax assets		2,~~145~~134			1,830
Less valuation allowance		(79	)		(79	)
Deferred tax asset		2,~~066~~055			1,751
Deferred tax liabilities
Prepaids		60			60
Gross deferred tax liability		60			60
Net deferred tax asset	$	21,~~006~~995		$	1,691

The following table summarizes the classification of the above amounts in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	June 30,2011		December 31,2010
Current assets
Deferred income taxes	$	806	$	762
Other assets
Deferred income taxes		1,200		929
Net deferred tax asset	$	2,006	$	1,691

The tables above do not include the unrecognized tax benefit liability described previously.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued

~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010

The following table summarizes the classification of the above amounts in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of the dates indicated:


(in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Current assets
Deferred income taxes	$	771	$	762
Other assets
Deferred income taxes		1,224		929

Net deferred tax asset	$	1,995	$	1,691

The tables above do not include the unrecognized tax benefit liability described previously.

5. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) represents the amount of earnings available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted EPS represents the amount of earnings available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period adjusted for the potential issuance of common shares for stock options, if dilutive.

The following table presents the Company’s calculation of basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended Sept. 30,

Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,

(in thousands)

2011

2010

2011

2010

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic

7,~~867~~880

7,~~826~~842

7,~~866~~870

7,~~825~~831

Dilutive effect of stock options

~~289~~245

~~140~~169

~~307~~246

66129

Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted

8,~~156~~125

78,~~966~~011

8,~~173~~116

7,~~891~~960

The computation of diluted EPS for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 excluded options to purchase approximately ~~427~~827,000 shares and ~~412~~545,000 shares, respectively, that were anti-dilutive because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the respective periods (approximately ~~413~~ 484,000 shares and ~~579~~489,000 shares, respectively, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010).

6. Segment Information

The Company’s reportable segments are Product and Service. PDSi is a global provider of electronics repair and reverse logistics services; ODM and OEM integrated computing services; and embedded computing products and design services for the diversified computing, telecommunications, imaging, defense/aerospace, medical, semiconductor and industrial automation markets. PDSi provides a variety of engineering and manufacturing services for global OEMs requiring custom product design, system integration, repair programs, warranty management, and/or specialized production capabilities. PDSi’s engineering, technical and operational capabilities span the entire product lifecycle allowing the Company to better understand and develop custom solutions for each of its customer’s unique requirements.

PDSi’s product capabilities range from board-level designs to globally certified, fully integrated systems, specializing in long-life computer products and unique, customer-centric solutions. PDSi’s capability to perform higher-level repair services in-region allows the Company to customize solutions for its customers so that they can deliver world-class service levels to their customers with reduced logistics, component replacement and inventory costs.

The “Other” line item in the following tables reflects the costs and assets of the functional and administrative groups of the Company that are not allocated to the reportable segments, including finance, information technology, human resources and executive management. The Company evaluates performance based on the operating results of the Product and Service segments and based on their effectiveness in covering the other administrative expenses of the Company. The Company sells its products and services in the United States and internationally and attributes sales based on shipping point.

PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued

~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s segment operating results for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended Sept. 30,

Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,

(in thousands)

2011

2010

2011

2010

Sales

Product

2,~~164~~151

42,~~842~~343

47,~~890~~041

1013,~~769~~112

Service

4,~~657~~544

3,~~126~~971

812,~~336~~880

69,~~011~~982

Total

6,~~821~~695

76,~~968~~314

1319,~~226~~921

1623,~~780~~094

Gross profit

Product

~~286~~325

~~986~~375

~~850~~1,175

2,~~055~~430

Service

1,~~958~~891

1,~~249~~851

35,~~477~~368

24,~~329~~180

Total

2,~~244~~216

2,~~235~~226

46,~~327~~543

46,~~384~~610

Income (loss) from operations

Product

4571

~~660~~137

~~323~~394

1,~~364~~501

Service

1,~~382~~267

~~862~~1,367

23,~~395~~662

12,~~514~~881

Other

(1,~~078~~103

)

(1,~~122~~010

)

(23,~~110~~213

)

(23,~~057~~067

)

Total

~~349~~235

~~400~~494

~~608~~843

~~821~~1,315

The following table summarizes segment assets as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	~~June~~September 30,2011		December 31,2010
Product	$	2,~~690~~806	$	3,280
Service		5,~~571~~410		5,443
Other		4,~~836~~742		3,265
Total	$	1312,~~097~~958	$	11,988

The following table summarizes sales by geographic region for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended Sept. 30,

Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,

(in thousands)

2011

2010

2011

2010

United States

5,~~764~~714

75,~~135~~537

1117,~~367~~081

1520,~~176~~713

International

~~1,057~~981

~~833~~777

12,~~859~~840

12,~~604~~381

Total

6,~~821~~695

76,~~968~~314

1319,~~226~~921

1623,~~780~~094

The following table summarizes long-lived assets by geographic region as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	~~June~~September 30,2011		December 31,2010
United States	$	1,~~762~~781	$	1,277
International		1,~~381~~330		1,297
Total	$	3,~~143~~111	$	2,574

International long-lived assets include goodwill of $0.8 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. All international sales and long-lived assets are in the Service segment.

ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

Portions of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including information incorporated by reference) include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, but not limited to, statements regarding Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (“PDSi”, the “Company” or “we”) achieving its financial growth and profitability goals, or its sales, earnings and profitability expectations for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “seek,” “may” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Investors are cautioned that such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results due to many factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

changes in general economic conditions, including prolonged or substantial economic downturn, and any related financial difficulties experienced by original equipment manufacturers, end users, customers, suppliers or others with whom the Company does business;

•

changes in customer order patterns;

•

changes in our business or our relationship with major technology partners or significant customers;

•

failure to maintain adequate levels of inventory;

•

production components and service parts cease to be readily available in the marketplace;

•

lack of adequate financing to meet working capital needs or to take advantage of business and future growth opportunities that may arise;

•

inability of cost reduction initiatives to lead to a realization of savings in labor, facilities or other operational costs;

•

deviation of actual results from estimates and/or assumptions used by the Company in the application of its significant accounting policies;

•

lack of success in technological advancements;

•

inability to retain certifications, authorizations or licenses to provide certain products and/or services;

•

risks associated with new business practices, processes and information systems;

•

impact of judicial rulings or government regulations, including related compliance costs;

•

disruption in the business of suppliers, customers or service providers due to adverse weather, casualty events, technological difficulty, acts of war or terror, or other causes;

•

risks associated with doing business internationally, including economic, political and social instability and foreign currency exposure; and

•

other factors from time to time described in the Company’s filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any such statements, except as required by applicable law.

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in its 2010 ~~Annual~~ Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Overview

PDSi is a global provider of electronics repair and reverse logistics services; system integration and original design manufacturer (“ODM”) computing design and manufacturing services; and embedded computing products and design services for the diversified computing, telecommunications, imaging, defense/aerospace, medical, semiconductor and industrial automation markets. PDSi provides a variety of engineering and manufacturing services for global original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) requiring custom product design, system integration, repair programs, warranty management, and/or specialized production capabilities. We have facilities in the United States (“U.S.”), Europe and Asia. More than just an ODM, integrator or reverse logistics provider, PDSi’s engineering, technical and operational capabilities span the entire product lifecycle allowing us to better understand and develop custom solutions for each of our customer’s unique requirements. Our product capabilities range from board-level designs to globally certified, fully integrated systems, specializing in long-life computer products and unique, customer-centric solutions. Our capability to perform higher-level repair services in-region allows us to customize solutions for our customers so that they can deliver world-class service levels to their customers with reduced logistics, component replacement and inventory costs. The common shares of PDSi are traded on NYSE Amex under the stock symbol “PNS.”

During the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we recorded net income of $~~180~~214,000, or $0.02 03 per diluted share, versus net income of $~~300~~1,673,000, or $0.0421 per diluted share, for the prior year quarter (including a $1.3 ~~During~~million net tax benefit related to the ~~six~~reversal of most of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance). During the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we recorded net income of $~~735~~949,000, or $0.0912 per diluted share (including $0.3 million related to research and development tax credit adjustments), versus net income of $~~609~~2,282,000, or $0.0829 per diluted share, for the prior year period (including the $1.3 million valuation allowance reversal benefit noted above). See below for further discussion of consolidated and reportable segment results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2011 and 2010.

~~Although~~We wereviewed ~~periodically had considered the potential tax savings associated with pursuing research and development (“R&D”) tax credits,~~ our ~~then recent operating losses, combined with existing federal U.S.~~ net ~~operating~~deferred ~~loss~~tax ~~(“NOL”)~~assets ~~carryforwards,~~as ~~precluded an economical pursuit~~ of ~~such credits. However~~September 30, ~~based~~2009 onto ~~positive~~assess ~~changes~~the inneed ~~our operating results and~~to ~~financial~~establish ~~position~~a invaluation ~~2010,~~allowance asdue ~~well~~to as the ~~use~~continuing ofuncertain ~~existing~~economic ~~NOL~~environment ~~carryforwards,~~and weour ~~determined during the fourth quarter of 2010 that the benefits would outweigh both the cost of an R&D~~ pre-tax ~~credit~~loss ~~study~~for ~~and~~ the ~~establishment~~nine ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~necessary infrastructure~~September 30, to2009. beAt ~~able~~that ~~to claim such credits in the future. Accordingly~~time, weour ~~recorded a~~ net deferred tax ~~benefit~~assets ofprimarily ~~$0.5~~consisted ~~million during the fourth quarter~~ of ~~2010~~temporary ~~for estimated R&D tax credits for tax years 2001 through 2010 that we believed were more~~differences ~~likely~~related ~~than not~~ to beinventory ~~sustained~~reserves ~~upon~~and ~~examination~~federal bynet ~~the~~operating ~~Internal~~loss ~~Revenue~~(“NOL”) ~~Service~~carryforwards. WeBased ~~substantially~~on ~~completed~~our ~~the~~analysis ~~calculation~~ and ~~documentation~~application of ~~these R&D tax credits during~~ the ~~first~~GAAP ~~quarter of 2011~~framework, ~~resulting~~we inestablished ana ~~additional~~valuation ~~net~~allowance ~~tax benefit~~ of $01.36 million. ~~During~~against ~~the~~our ~~second quarter of 2011, we recorded~~ net ~~tax~~deferred ~~expense of $0.1 million associated with the finalization of the amended federal and state~~ tax ~~returns for prior years impacted by the R&D tax credit study~~assets.

During the third quarter of 2010, we concluded that our operations had demonstrated sustainable profitability, and that future taxable income would more likely than not allow for realization of benefits from existing deferred income tax assets. Accordingly, we reversed substantially all of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. As a result, the year-to-date U.S. effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2010 was approximately 34%, versus an effective rate of approximately 22% applied in the first six months of 2010. The combined impact of the valuation allowance reversal and the adjustment of the year-to-date U.S. effective tax rate resulted in a $1.3 million net non-cash benefit.

Although we periodically had considered the potential tax savings associated with pursuing research and development (“R&D”) tax credits, our then recent operating losses, combined with existing federal U.S. NOL carryforwards, precluded an economical pursuit of such credits. However, based on positive changes in our operating results and financial position in 2010, as well as the use of existing NOL carryforwards, we determined during the fourth quarter of 2010 that the benefits would outweigh both the cost of an R&D tax credit study and the establishment of the necessary infrastructure to be able to claim such credits in the future. Accordingly, we recorded a net tax benefit of $0.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2010 for estimated R&D tax credits for tax years 2001 through 2010 that we believed were more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service. We substantially completed the calculation and documentation of these R&D tax credits during the first quarter of 2011, resulting in an additional net tax benefit of $0.3 million. During the second and third quarters of 2011, we recorded net tax expense of $0.1 million and a net benefit of $0.1 million, respectively, associated with the finalization of the amended federal and state tax returns for prior years impacted by the R&D tax credit study.

Results of Operations

Consolidated Operations

~~Second~~Third Quarter – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2011		% ofSales			2010			% ofSales			%Change
Sales	$	6,~~821~~695		100.0	%	$	76,~~968~~314			100.0	%		~~-14~~6	%
Cost of sales		4,~~577~~479		6766.19	%		54,~~733~~088			7264.07	%		~~-20~~10	%
Gross profit		2,~~244~~216		3233.91	%		2,~~235~~226			2835.03	%		0	%
Operating expenses		1,~~895~~981		2729.86	%		1,~~835~~732			2327.04	%		314	%
Income from operations		~~349~~235		53.15	%		~~400~~494			57.08	%		-1352	%
Other expense
Interest expense		—		0.0	%		184			0.21	%		-100	%
Income before income taxes		~~349~~235		53.15	%		~~382~~490			47.8	%		-952	%
Income tax expense		~~169~~21		20.43	%		82(1,183	)		1-18.07	%		~~106~~NM	%
Net income	$	~~180~~214		23.62	%	$	~~300~~1,673			326.85	%		-4087	%

The decrease in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the prior year quarter primarily was due to the aforementioned net tax expense of $0.1 million associated with the finalization of the amended federal and state tax returns for prior years impacted by the R&D tax credit study as well as increased operating expenses, reflecting investments in personnel necessary to support and grow the business. Strong growth in sales and gross profit in the Service segment offset the impact on gross profit of lower sales in the Product segment. Service segment gross profit increased 57% primarily due to a 49% increase in Service sales driven by the growth of business in the U.S. and Europe for both new customers and new programs within existing customers. Interest expense was zero as the Company did not utilize its line of credit during the second quarter of 2011.

For the second quarter of 2011, the Company had three customers that generated $1.7 million, $1.6 million and $1.2 million, or 25%, 24% and 18%, respectively, of total sales. Of the revenues from these customers, 31% and 69% were included in Product and Service segment sales, respectively. For the second quarter of 2010, the Company had three customers that generated $2.5 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million, or 32%, 11% and 11%, respectively, of total sales. Of the revenues from these customers, 53% and 47% were included in Product and Service segment sales, respectively. Major customer relationships consist of multiple product or service programs in various stages of their lifecycle. The Company continues to work toward developing a more diversified customer revenue base across both its Product and Service segments.

The decrease in net income for the third quarter of 2011 compared to the prior year quarter primarily was due to a $1.3 million net tax benefit recorded during the third quarter of 2010 associated with the aforementioned reversal of most of our valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. This partially was offset by the previously described $0.1 million tax benefit in the third quarter of 2011 related to the finalization of amended tax returns for prior years impacted by the R&D tax credit study. Furthermore, higher operating expenses in the current year quarter reflect investments in personnel necessary to grow and support the business. Overall gross profit was flat with strong Service segment sales growth offsetting lower Product segment results. Service segment sales increased 14% due to the growth of business in the U.S. and Europe for both new customers and new programs within existing customers. Interest expense was zero as the Company did not utilize its line of credit during the third quarter of 2011.

For the third quarter of 2011, we had three customers that generated $1.9 million, $1.5 million and $1.0 million, or 28%, 22% and 15%, respectively, of total sales. Of the revenues from these customers, 27% and 73% were included in Product and Service segment sales, respectively. For the third quarter of 2010, we had two customers that generated $2.2 million and $1.1 million, or 35% and 18%, respectively, of total sales. Of the revenues from these customers, 27% and 73% were included in Product and Service segment sales, respectively. Major customer relationships consist of multiple product or service programs in various stages of their lifecycle. We continue to work toward developing a more diversified customer revenue base across both our Product and Service segments.

Year-to-Date – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2011			% ofSales			2010			% ofSales			%Change
Sales	$	1319,~~226~~921			100.0	%	$	1623,~~780~~094			100.0	%		-2114	%
Cost of sales		813,~~899~~378			67.32	%		1216,~~396~~484			7371.94	%		-2819	%
Gross profit		46,~~327~~543			32.78	%		46,~~384~~610			2628.16	%		-1	%
Operating expenses		35,~~719~~700			28.16	%		35,~~563~~295			2122.29	%		48	%
Income from operations		~~608~~843			4.62	%		~~821~~1,315			45.97	%		-2636	%
Other expense
Interest expense		1			0.0	%		4145			0.2	%		-98	%
Income before income taxes		~~607~~842			4.62	%		~~780~~1,270			45.65	%		-2234	%
Income tax expense (benefit)		(~~128~~107	)		-10.15	%		~~171~~(1,012	)		1-4.04	%		NM
Net income	$	~~735~~949			54.68	%	$	~~609~~2,282			39.69	%		21-58	%

~~Higher~~Lower net income for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 compared to the prior year period primarily was due to the ~~aforementioned~~reversal ~~net~~of ~~income~~most of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance as discussed above, resulting in a $1.3 million net tax benefit during the third quarter of 2010. Net tax benefits of $0.23 million related to R&D tax credit adjustments recorded during the first ~~and~~three ~~second~~ quarters of 2011. Inalso ~~addition,~~impacted ~~strong~~the ~~growth~~comparison inbetween ~~the~~periods. ~~Service~~Increased ~~segment~~operating ~~offset~~expenses ~~the~~in ~~impact~~2011 ofprimarily ~~lower~~reflect ~~sales~~investments in ~~the~~personnel ~~Product segment,~~necessary ~~with~~to angrow ~~increase~~and insupport ~~overall~~the business. Overall gross profit as a percentage of sales rose to 33% in 2011 from 2629% in 2010 driven by the shift in mix toward higher margin Service segment business, which helped mitigate the impact on gross margin of lower sales in the Product segment. Service segment gross profit increased 4928% primarily due to a 3929% increase in Service sales driven by the growth of business in the U.S. and Europe for both new customers and new programs within existing customers. ~~The increased operating expenses primarily reflect investments in personnel needed to support and grow the business.~~ Interest expense was reduced to virtually zero due to minimal usage of the Company’s line of credit over the first ~~half~~nine months of 2011.

For the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ had three customers that generated $34.09 million, $24.83 million and $23.2 million, or 2325%, 2122% and 1716%, respectively, of total sales. Of the revenues from these customers, 3129% and 6971% were included in Product and Service segment sales, respectively. For the first ~~six~~ nine months of 2010, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ had three customers that generated $57.36 million, $2.18 million and $2.04 million, or 3233%, 1312% and 1210%, respectively, of total sales. Of the revenues from these customers, 7547% and 2553% were included in Product and Service segment sales, respectively.

Segment Operations

Product

Second Quarter – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross profit for the Product segment for the three months ended June 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2011		% ofSales			2010		% ofSales			%Change
Sales	$	2,164		100.0	%	$	4,842		100.0	%		-55	%
Cost of sales		1,878		86.8	%		3,856		79.6	%		-51	%
Gross profit	$	286		13.2	%	$	986		20.4	%		-71	%

The decline in Product segment gross profit was driven by a 55% decrease in sales. This decline primarily was attributable to significantly lower sales to telecommunications and defense OEMs that had very strong activity in the prior year quarter, along with declines at larger imaging and other OEM customers that had occurred over the course of 2010. Reduced operating leverage on lower sales levels resulted in a 13% gross margin in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 20% in the comparable quarter of 2010.

Segment Operations

Product

Third Quarter – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross profit for the Product segment for the three months ended September 30:


(dollars in thousands)	2011		% of Sales			2010		% of Sales			% Change
Sales	$	2,151		100.0	%	$	2,343		100.0	%		-8	%
Cost of sales		1,826		84.9	%		1,968		84.0	%		-7	%

Gross profit	$	325		15.1	%	$	375		16.0	%		-13	%

Lower Product segment gross profit reflects an 8% decline in sales primarily attributable to the ramp down of certain legacy programs, partially offset by growth in sales to defense and imaging OEMs. Reduced operating leverage on lower sales levels resulted in a slight decline to a 15% gross margin in the third quarter of 2011 compared to 16% in the comparable quarter of 2010.

Year-to-Date – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross profit for the Product segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2011		% ofSales			2010		% ofSales			%Change
Sales	$	47,~~890~~041		100.0	%	$	1013,~~769~~112		100.0	%		-5546	%
Cost of sales		45,~~040~~866		8283.63	%		810,~~714~~682		8081.95	%		-5445	%
Gross profit	$	~~850~~1,175		1716.47	%	$	2,~~055~~430		1918.15	%		-5952	%

A 5546% decrease in Product sales, including $3.7 million lower sales to OEMs in the telecommunications industry that had especially strong activity in 2010, drove the decline in Product segment gross profit. ~~Lower~~The continued shift in sales mix to higher margin products and management of manufacturing overhead costs to levels consistent with lower Product revenues helped to reduce the negative impact on gross margins, which fell to 17% for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 compared to 19% in the comparable period of 2010, ~~were~~due ~~mitigated by a continued shift in sales mix~~ to ~~higher~~reduced ~~margin~~operating ~~products~~leverage ~~and~~on ~~management~~46% ~~of manufacturing overhead costs to levels consistent with~~ lower ~~Product revenues~~revenue.

Service

~~Second~~Third Quarter – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross profit for the Service segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2011		% ofSales			2010		% ofSales			%Change
Sales	$	4,~~657~~544		100.0	%	$	3,~~126~~971		100.0	%		4914	%
Cost of sales		2,~~699~~653		58.04	%		12,~~877~~120		6053.04	%		4425	%
Gross profit	$	1,~~958~~891		4241.06	%	$	1,~~249~~851		4046.06	%		572	%

Gross profit in the Service segment increased ~~primarily~~ due to ~~the~~a ~~growth~~14% ofincrease in sales fueled by business ingrowth in the U.S. and Europe for both new customers and new programs within existing customers. ~~The~~A ~~continuing~~ shift in mix toward ~~higher~~lower margin programs, ~~and~~as ~~gains~~well as investments in ~~operating~~overhead ~~leverage~~to onadd ~~49%~~capability ~~sales~~and support future growth, drove ana ~~increase~~decline in gross profit as a percentage of sales to 42% in the ~~second~~ third quarter of 2011 from 4047% in the comparable quarter of 2010, despite the overall trend toward higher margin programs.

Year-to-Date – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross profit for the Service segment for the six months ended June 30:

(dollars in thousands)	2011		% ofSales			2010		% ofSales			%Change
Sales	$	8,336		100.0	%	$	6,011		100.0	%		39	%
Cost of sales		4,859		58.3	%		3,682		61.3	%		32	%
Gross profit	$	3,477		41.7	%	$	2,329		38.7	%		49	%

The improvement in Service segment gross profit was driven by a 39% increase in Service sales, reflecting business growth in the U.S. and Europe for both new customers and new programs within existing customers. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 42% in the first six months of 2011 from 39% in the comparable period of 2010 due to a continuing shift toward higher margin programs and gains in operating leverage.

Year-to-Date – 2011 Compared to 2010

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross profit for the Service segment for the nine months ended September 30:


(dollars in thousands)	2011		% of Sales			2010		% of Sales			% Change
Sales	$	12,880		100.0	%	$	9,982		100.0	%		29	%
Cost of sales		7,512		58.3	%		5,802		58.1	%		29	%

Gross profit	$	5,368		41.7	%	$	4,180		41.9	%		28	%

The improvement in Service segment gross profit was driven by a 29% increase in sales, reflecting business growth in the U.S. and Europe for both new customers and new programs within existing customers. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was flat at 42% in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, with gains in operating leverage offsetting a third quarter 2011 shift in mix toward lower margin programs and investments in overhead to add capability and support future growth. However, the overall trend within the Service segment continued toward higher margin programs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity and capital resources demonstrate the overall financial strength of the Company and its ability to generate cash flows from operations and borrow funds at competitive rates to meet operating and growth needs.

Our current capital structure consists of stockholders’ equity with a line of credit ~~and~~available ~~stockholders’~~to ~~equity~~provide supplemental liquidity. The following table summarizes the Company’s capital structure as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)	~~June~~September 30,2011			December 31,2010
Line of credit	$	—		$	273
Stockholders’ equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		9,~~527~~772			8,751
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(3101	)		(90	)
Total stockholders’ equity		9,~~524~~671			8,661
Total capital	$	9,~~524~~671		$	8,934

Based on the Company’s historical cash flow, current financial results and unused available capacity on the line of credit, we believe we have access to adequate resources to provide sufficient liquidity for the operations of the Company over the next year. See further discussion in “Financing Activities” below.

The following table summarizes the Company’s condensed consolidated cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30:

(in thousands)	2011			2010
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,~~282~~558		$	1,~~697~~793
Net cash used in investing activities		(~~176~~366	)		(22110	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~306~~132	)		(1,~~845~~881	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash		274			(181	)
Increase (decrease) in cash		~~827~~1,064			(~~188~~199	)
Cash at beginning of period		465			323
Cash at end of period	$	1,~~292~~529		$	~~135~~124

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.36 million and $1.78 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net income adjusted for the effects of non-cash items, which primarily include deferred income taxes, ~~inventory~~depreciation ~~reserves~~expense and ~~depreciation~~inventory ~~expense~~reserves, resulted in cash inflows of $01.82 million and $01.98 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Changes in working capital resulted in $0.5 4 million in cash provided for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 compared to ~~$0.8~~a ~~million~~net neutral impact for the comparable period of 2010.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities represents additions to property and equipment. Increased activity in 2011 primarily relates to acquisitions of equipment needed to support growth and added capability in the Service segment.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.31 million and $1.89 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Financing activity in both periods primarily reflects net repayments on the Company’s line of credit. All cash generated by U.S. operations after funding investing activities is applied to any existing balance on the line of credit.

On March 24, 2011, we entered into a Credit Agreement and a Security Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), providing for a revolving credit facility (the “Line”) with a maximum line of credit of $3.0 million, subject to borrowing base restrictions. The borrowing base is determined as follows: 1) the sum of (a) 85% of the aggregate amount of eligible accounts receivable located within the United States, plus (b) 75% of the aggregate amount of eligible accounts receivable located outside of the United States, plus (c) the lesser of 10% of the aggregate amount of eligible inventory or $0.5 million.

The outstanding balance on the Line bears interest monthly at a fluctuating annual rate of 3% above the Daily One Month London Interbank Offered Rate. The Line matures on March 22, 2013.

On March 24, 2011, in connection with entering into the Credit Agreement and Security Agreement described above, we terminated our prior line of credit agreement with Wells Fargo. The Company did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the prior line of credit agreement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements with (1) any obligation under a guarantee contract; (2) a retained or contingent interest in assets or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets; or (3) any other obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument or arising out of a variable interest.

During the normal course of business, we may have numerous outstanding purchase orders with vendors to purchase inventory for use in products that are sold to our customers or are used in performing repair services for our customers. We do not record such orders as liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets until the material is placed on a common carrier or delivered to the Company’s facilities, depending on terms of the arrangement, or when pulled from on-site vendor managed inventory. We have no minimum purchase quantity requirements with any of our vendors.

Critical Accounting Policies and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Our most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventory, goodwill and income taxes. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP, with no need for judgment in application. In addition, there are areas in which management’s judgment in selecting an available alternative would not produce a materially different result. Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K describes the significant accounting policies and methods used by the Company. We do not expect the adoption of any recently issued accounting standards to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our critical accounting policies have not changed materially from those disclosed in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ITEM 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”). The disclosure controls and procedures are to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No change was made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s ~~second~~third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit	If incorporated by reference, document with which Exhibit was previously filed with the SEC
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011	Contained herein
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011	Contained herein
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011	Contained herein
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011	Contained herein
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document	Contained herein
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Contained herein
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Contained herein
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document	Contained herein
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	Contained herein
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Contained herein

XBRL (“Extensible Business Reporting Language”) information is furnished and not filed; is not a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933; is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

				PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
Date: July 29, 2011				/s/ John D. Bair
Date: October 28, 2011				/s/ John D. Bair
				John D. Bair
				Chief Executive Officer
Date: July 29, 2011				/s/ Nicholas J. Tomashot
Date: October 28, 2011				/s/ Nicholas J. Tomashot
				Nicholas J. Tomashot
				Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS INC