Nube,Table throughof its association with major computing industry leaders such as Dell, VMware, Arrow ECS, Hewlett Packard and EMC gives us direct access to users, new purchasers, the newest technologies and additional access to colleges and universities doing value added training. These associations have increased our revenue sources from training only to: Contents

RobynTable Bailey. Ms. Bailey became Secretary and Director in March 2010. Ms. Bailey was also appointed as President of Nube in March 2010. She has spent the past fifteen years in Information Technology primarily as a project manager/consultant/instructor. Microsoft technologies and EMC Storage technologies had been her major focus; but three years ago her work with storage technologies led her into virtualization, specializing in VMware systems. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: October 31, ~~2010~~2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-50089

NX GLOBAL, INC.

f/k/a NATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant in its charter)

Nevada		52-2082372
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
16238 F-108 Ranch Rd, Austin, TX		78717
(address of principal place of business)		(Zip Code)

16238 F-108 Ranch Rd, Austin, TX		78717
(address of principal place of business)		(Zip Code)

Issuer’s telephone number: (512) 354-7840

Issuer's telephone number: (877) 249-9089

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x¨ No ¨x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer , an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)

(Check One)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of ~~April~~February 3010, ~~2010~~2012 was $~~756~~112,~~078~~ 025.

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, as of ~~March~~February 10, ~~2011~~2012 was ~~264~~240,~~916~~031,~~386~~013.

Contents
PART I
ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	1
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	4
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	4
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	4
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	4
ITEM 4.	(REMOVED AND RESERVED)	4
PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	4
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	6
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	7
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	10
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	10
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	10
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	10
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	11
PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	11
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	12
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	14
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	16
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	16
PART IV
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	16

Contents


PART I
ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	1
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	3
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	3
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	3
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	3
ITEM 4.	(REMOVED AND RESERVED)	3
PART II
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	3
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	5
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	5
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	9
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	9
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	9
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	9
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	10
PART III
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	10
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	11
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	13
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	15
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	15
PART IV
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	15

PART I

THIS FILING DOES NOT MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF FORM 10-K

We have not provided in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2011, the filing of a report of Friedman LLP on the financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, as required pursuant to Regulation S-X. Friedman LLP was unwilling to reissue this report as a result of a fee dispute between Friedman LLP and us; as a result, we have engaged our current independent registered public accounting firm, Kingery & Crouse, P.A. (“K & C”), to also (in addition to our Fiscal Year 2011 audit) perform an audit of the financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010 (the “Audit”). Upon completion of the Audit, we will file an amended Form 10-K, which includes the Audit. As indicated herein, we appointed K & C as our Independent registered public accounting firm on June 6, 2011 and it has since continued to act in such capacity to present.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report contains certain forward-looking statements regarding NX Global, Inc. ~~f/k/a National Energy Services Company~~, ~~Inc.,~~ (“NX Global”) and together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”), its business and its financial prospects. These statements represent Management’s present intentions and its present belief regarding the Company’s future. Nevertheless, there are numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results suggested in this Report. Among the more significant factors are:

•

The Company has not been profitable in recent years.

•

The Company lacks the capital necessary to significantly expand its business. Unless the expansion of business is sufficient enough that the gross profit will exceed administrative costs, the Company will not achieve profitability.

•

Expansion of business will require that an expansion of accounting and other internal management systems. Such an expansion may lead to inefficiencies that could prevent profitability.

•

The Company has sought to expand its business model and discontinue certain unprofitable business elements while expecting to expand other product offerings.

Because these and other risks may cause NX Global’s actual results to differ from those anticipated by Management, the reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements that appear in this Report. Readers should also take note that NX Global will not necessarily make any public announcement of changes affecting these forward-looking statements, which should be considered accurate on this date only.

ITEM 1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Business of the Company

NX Global was incorporated on February 17, 1998 in Nevada to engage in an internet related business. and National Energy Services Company, Inc., an unaffiliated New Jersey corporation formed in 1995 (“NESNJ”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange, dated January 19, 2001 pursuant to which the shareholders of NESNJ on January 19, 2001 were issued 10100,000~~,000~~ shares of common stock of NX Global, par value $.001, in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of the NESNJ, which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. For accounting purposes, the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition. In September ~~2010~~2011 the Company changed its name to NX Global, Inc. from National Energy Services Company, Inc.

NX Global, Inc. sold the stock it owned in NESNJ, the New Jersey subsidiary in March 2010. This entity had ceased most of its operations in January, 2010. The operations of NESNJ, which comprised of all the Company’s operations until January 2010, are considered as discontinued operations.

The Company isintends ~~engaged~~to ~~in operating~~ operate three divisions and various subsidiaries within each division either created by the Company or to be purchased for more rapid growth. The divisions include Renewable Energy Project Management, Renewable Energy Product Sales and Green Internet Technologies.

Renewable Energy Project Management ~~initially~~ consists of project management and marketing of those services to solar/thermal, bio-fuels and waste to energy project owners. Current various joint ventures investments are being negotiated to enable the Company to get into the markets with signed projects. These projects include bio-fuel from algae and from pyrolisis of tires, pyrolisis of municipal solid waste to energy, and ~~combination~~pyrolisis ~~operations~~ of ~~solar/thermal~~medical ~~and animal~~ waste ~~pyrolisis~~.

The Renewable Energy Product Sales division markets to the end user products that reduce the energy cost to home and commercial building users to pennies on the dollars they previously spent and provide revenue for the company through sale of excess energy to the grid. Additional products include lighting and water systems for commercial structures, some that had been marketed by the Company’s former New Jersey subsidiary.

The Green Internet Technologies Service and Training Division is designed to first assist all affiliated divisions in the marketing of their products and services and will expand into green social networking products and services and training for new technology development and certification initially in the virtualization and cloud computing markets.

~~Except~~The ~~for~~Renewable Energy Product Sales division markets to the ~~Internet~~end ~~Technologies~~user ~~Service~~products that reduce the energy cost to home and ~~Training~~commercial ~~Division,~~building ~~none~~users ofto ~~the~~and ~~divisions were~~provide ~~active~~revenue ~~during~~for the ~~year~~company ~~ended~~through ~~October 31,~~sale ~~2010~~of excess energy to the grid.

InThe ~~January~~Green ~~2010,~~Technologies ~~the~~Division ~~Company~~is ~~purchased~~designed ~~a contract~~ to ~~manage~~first ~~the construction~~assist ofall aaffiliated ~~renewable/alternative~~divisions ~~energy site~~ in ~~Southern~~the ~~California~~marketing ~~signaling~~of ~~its~~their ~~change~~products inand ~~direction~~services ~~from~~and ~~its~~will ~~prior~~expand ~~business~~into ~~model~~sales ~~to alternative energy construction management~~ and ~~operations~~installation ~~and other types~~ of ~~businesses~~diesel ~~associated~~emission ~~with~~retrofit ~~environmentally~~products ~~friendly~~in ~~operations. The Company placed~~ the ~~contract~~Northeastern ~~in its newly formed subsidiary, Applied Concepts for Energy, Inc~~U. ~~(“ACEC”)~~S. ~~This~~pursuant ~~operation~~to ~~houses~~our ~~the~~joint ~~construction~~venture ~~management~~agreement ~~and~~with ~~facilities~~Eastern ~~operations~~Energy ~~divisions. This business is dedicated to building~~ and ~~operating~~Emissions ~~renewable/alternative energy~~Solutions, ~~waste to energy, algae production for bio fuels and food for human consumption and other food production using compost created from waste streams~~Inc. ~~The~~on ~~Southern California project has not been funded by its owner and other technical issue’s have arisen that may cause the project not to be completed or be completed~~October 26, ~~but without our involvement~~2011.

~~The~~None Company purchased Global Green Resources, Inc. (“GGR”) in March 2010 in keeping with its business model to operate eco friendly businesses. In November 2010, GGR changed its name to Nube, Inc. (“Nube”). This subsidiary provides training for certification of ~~operators and engineers installing or using cloud computing and its associated virtualization components. Nube is in~~ the ~~midst~~divisions ofhad ~~developing~~revenue ~~its~~during ~~own cloud services platform for customers to use in training and to facilitate~~ the ~~storage~~year ofended ~~their~~October 31, ~~data as they become virtualized in their businesses~~2011. ~~The training boot camps that have been developed are two intensive training sessions for all aspects and several products required to form each trainee’s virtualization/cloud solution.~~

The Company purchased Global Green Resources, Inc. (“GGR”) in March 2010 in keeping with its business model to operate eco friendly businesses. In November 2010, GGR changed its name to Nube, Inc. (“Nube”). This subsidiary provided training for certification of operators and engineers installing or using cloud computing and its associated virtualization components. We ceased operating this company in September 2011.

Recent Developments

In November 2010, the Company’s subsidiary ACEC signed two joint venture agreements to further its business operations in algae production and the conversion of waste to energy. The agreements include terms for funding, the licensing of patented and non-patented production and manufacturing and growing technologies, site management and project development, site procurement plus other related items. The joint ventures will not begin until funding is in place for their furtherance.

In January 2011, the Company has received a letter ~~committing~~of intent for the first $100,000,000 of financing for the proposed site near Portage Du Fort, Quebec, Canada. Negotiations are ongoing with the governmental agencies necessary to acquire permits and guarantees required to begin construction and operations. The site has recently been designated by the Pontiac MRC Quebec (“MRC”) as the region’s Environmental Industrial Park and the municipal waste collected throughout the region under the MRC must be delivered to the site for eco friendly disposal. This project is under review as a consortium of the MRC and the City of Gatineau, Quebec issued a qualifications request from the general business population within days of ACEC having signed a letter of intent to lease the property for this project in January 2011. The request for qualification requires several businesses from Quebec to be involved and significantly impairs the ability of ACEC or its joint venture partners from controlling its own destiny or operating the facility as it would like to maximize its potential economic impact. We are investigating the opportunity at several other sites in three other Canadian provinces for the utilization of the same technology. The venture has been abandoned due to modification of the requirements for participation by the local government entities in Quebec.

The Board of Directors has determined that ACEC should expand in the United States of America and has begun the planning and development of marketing for this expansion. These communities will need a minimum of 65,000 - 75,000 residents producing 300,000 tons of municipal solid waste, have a taxing authority that collects all the revenue and pays the disposal fees and allows the production and sale of energy from green components to the grid.

Principal Products and Services

The principal services offered by NX Global are project development, locating funding resources and technologies to enhance its core businesses in green environmental projects. The marketing of algae oil for fuel and its biomass for nutraceutical and animal feed is being developed to expand our business model.

2ACEC intends to provide project development, site management and operation of the project after construction is complete. These projects are specifically for waste to energy, algae growth and development, carbon capture and growing food for human consumption.

Nube supplies cutting edge virtualization and cloud computing training and is completing development of a cross platform training service. During the coming year, we are seeking opportunities to expand into a shared cloud lab that will allow software testing, training and demonstration facilities that leverage public and private clouds. Further expansion into Virtualization Solution Architecture enhances our scalability and fulfills our customer demand.

ACEC provides project development, site management and operation of the project after construction is complete. These projects are specifically for waste to energy, algae growth and development, carbon capture and growing food for human consumption.

Marketing, Sales and Distribution

The Company has developed a marketing plan to site owners, municipalities and counties, eco-friendly companies and existing waste to energy and algae growers and manufacturers of related equipment.

~~The~~2 Company believes that relationships are the cornerstone of its marketing philosophy. The process of building and maintaining working relationships requires a commitment at all levels of the organization. Our marketing program includes: market research, feasibility studies, public and industry relations, promotion, sales support, customer service, employee relations and training and education. As a result of the complexity of the products offered and the market, management works very hard to ensure that the Company’s employees and representatives have a working knowledge of all products and processes.

•The ~~pay~~Company asbelieves ~~you~~that ~~perform~~relationships ~~information~~are ~~technology~~the ~~(“IT”)~~cornerstone ~~testing~~of its marketing philosophy. The process of building and ~~development~~maintaining ~~for~~working ~~companies~~relationships requires a commitment at all levels of the organization. Our marketing program includes: market research, feasibility studies, public and ~~individuals~~industry ~~who~~relations, ~~are~~promotion, ~~considering~~sales ~~hosted~~support, customer orservice, ~~cloud~~employee ~~services~~relations and training and education. As a result of the complexity of the products offered and the market, management works very hard to ensure that ~~are~~the ~~seeking~~Company’s ~~proof~~representatives have a working knowledge of ~~concept~~all products ~~for~~and ~~their~~processes. ~~application~~

•ACEC ~~practice~~intends ~~labs~~to market directly to contractors, site owners and technology companies for ITall services provided. The introductions from these marketing contacts will be instrumental in all projects being developed, which may came from these interactions and lead to potential joint ventures being researched and the exposure for others to make contact with us.

• professional training for virtualization certification

• testing and development services for virtualization and cloud computing to Server Message Block (“SMB”) space

Target customers include small businesses with less than 100 employees and medium businesses with between 100 to 999 employees. Additional customers are health care providers, hospitals, law offices and small or non-profit schools.

ACEC markets directly to contractors, site owners and technology companies for all services provided. The introductions from these marketing contacts have been instrumental in all of the existing projects being developed, which came from these interactions and led to potential joint ventures currently being researched and the exposure for others to make contact with us.

Reliance on Major Customers and Suppliers

During the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 the Company was negotiating with potential customers and joint venture partners, in ~~construction,~~other ~~machinery~~emissions ~~and~~control ~~building~~systems ~~manufacturing, algal science research~~ and ~~growing~~waste ~~and~~solution ~~sales~~systems ofspecifically ~~products~~in the ~~from~~Mid-Atlantic ~~these ventures~~region. ~~The number of customers is small as there are a limited number customers for most of our products and services.~~

Nube currently relies on two customers for 100% its training revenue. Two customers, Technology Business Group and VM Trainers represented 81% and 19%, respectively, of the training revenue during the year ended October 31, 2010. In the next fiscal year it will begin utilizing its own software to train using mini boot camps with 15 to 20 trainees per intense two week session.

The Company has a limited group of suppliers but has not had the opportunity to utilize them until permits and sites are available.

Competition

The principal markets in which the Company competes are small with most companies existing in the developmental stage. Little business is done with the sale of our desired end products in North America. While there are many large site development companies, only a handful participate in our niche markets.

Nube competes only with the product resellers and developers who have designed their own training regimens. In several instances they are looking to us to administrate and possibly partner their training regimen so that they may focus on marketing and product development.

Employees

The Company, as of ~~March~~February 512, ~~2011~~2012, employs ~~two~~one ~~full time, no~~ part time ~~employees~~employee and three consultants to provide essential services. ~~None of the~~ The Company’s ~~employees~~employee is not represented by a labor union.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

None.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

None.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~On December 17, 2009, Nutek International, Inc~~None. ~~filed for an injunction to enjoin an employee of NESNJ from continuing to provide services. The Company believes that the suit has no merit as the employee resigned from the Company on~~ ~~December 22, 2009.~~

The above litigation was the responsibility of NESNJ, a New Jersey corporation, which was assumed by the buyer as part of the sale of the subsidiary in March 2010.

The Company is a party from time to time to various other legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these other matters will not have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4.

(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

The Company’s common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “NEGS” since September 26, 2006. As of February 19, ~~2011~~2010, the Company’s symbol was changed to ~~NEGSE~~NEGS. Set forth below are the high and low bid prices for each quarterly period from November 1, ~~2008~~2009 through October 31, ~~2010~~2011. The reported bid quotations ~~reflect~~ reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	Bid
	High		Low
Nov. 1, 2008 – Jan. 31, 2009	$	.08	$	.01
Nov. 1, 2009 – Jan. 31, 2010	$	.07	$	.02
Feb. 1, 2009 – Apr. 30, 2009	$	.08	$	.03
May 1, 2009 – July 31, 2009	$	.05	$	.02
Aug. 1, 2009 – Oct. 31, 2009	$	.04	$	.01
Nov. 1, 2009 – Jan. 31, 2010	$	.06	$	.01
Feb. 1, 2010 – Apr. 30, 2010	$	.07	$	.02
May 1, 2010 – July 31, 2010	$	.04	$	.01
Aug. 1, 2010 – Oct. 31, 2010	$	.05	$	.01
Nov. 1, 2010 – Jan. 31, 2011	$	0109	$	.0023
Feb. 1, 2011 – Apr. 30, 2011	$	.0028	$	0004
May 1, 2011 – July 31, 2011	$	.0017	$	.0003
Aug. 1, 2011 – Oct. 31, 2011	$	.0003	$	.0001

~~Holders.~~All ~~There~~prices are ~~141~~pre-reverse. ~~holders of~~The ~~record~~reverse split of ~~common~~1:100 ~~stock~~was aseffective ~~of March~~October 728, 2011.

Holders. There are 483 holders of record of common stock as of February 12, 2012.

Dividend Policy. The Company has not declared or paid cash dividends or made distributions in the past, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends or making distributions in the foreseeable future. The Company currently intends to retain and reinvest future earnings, if any, to finance operations.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

OnNone ~~March 12,~~not ~~2010,~~previously ~~the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock, with a fair market value of $175,000 to an investor relations company for consulting services~~reported.

OnWarrants: ~~March 18, 2010, the Company issued 7,900,000 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $118,500 for consulting services.~~

OnAs ~~April~~of October 631, 2011 and 2010, the Company ~~issued 2~~has 1,~~500~~000,000 million ~~shares~~warrants ofoutstanding ~~common~~at ~~stock with~~ a ~~fair~~weighted ~~market~~average ~~value~~exercise price of $~~50,000~~0.96. ~~for~~The ~~consulting services~~remaining contractual life of the warrants was 0.6 years at October 31, 2011.

OnStock ~~April 15,~~Compensation ~~2010,~~Plans: ~~the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of common stock for the purchase of Nube, formerly known as GGR with a fair market value of $180,000.~~

On ~~April~~January 2611, ~~2010~~2011, Company’s Board of Directors approved the ~~Company~~2011 ~~issued~~Consultant 3Stock Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”). Under the terms of the 2011 Plan,~~500~~ the Company reserved 20,000,000 shares of common stock ~~with a~~to ~~fair~~be ~~market~~issued ~~value~~during ofthe ~~$42,500~~2011 ofPlan’s ~~which~~one-year ~~$22,500~~term. Professionals ~~was~~and ~~for~~consultants ~~debt~~who ~~conversion~~provide ~~and~~services to the ~~remaining~~Company ~~$20~~are eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan. At October 31, 2011, 112,000 ~~for~~shares of ~~consulting~~common ~~services~~stock had been issued under the 2011 Plan.

On ~~August~~ March 30, 2010, Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2010 Professional/Consultant Stock Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”). Under the terms of the 2010 Plan, the Company ~~issued~~reserved 3100,~~500,~~000 shares of common stock ~~with~~to abe ~~fair~~issued ~~market~~during ~~value~~the of2010 ~~$35~~Plan’s one-year term. Professionals and consultants who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan. At October 31, 2011, all 100,000 ~~for~~shares ~~consulting~~were ~~services~~issued under the 2010 Plan.

OnThe ~~September 8,~~Board ~~2010,~~of Directors adopted the ~~Company~~2007 ~~issued~~Equity 10Incentive Plan in 2007 (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the Board to issue up to 1,~~800~~500,000 common shares during the ten year period of the ~~common~~2007 ~~stock~~Plan. ~~for~~The ~~consulting~~shares ~~services~~may ~~with~~be aawarded ~~fair~~to ~~market~~employees ~~value~~or directors of ~~$150~~the Company,~~120~~ as well as to consultants. The shares may be awarded as outright grants or in the form of options, restricted stock or performance shares. At October 31, 2011, 1,496,587 shares remain available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.

On4 ~~September 8, 2010, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock for cash proceeds of $3,333.~~

On September 8, 2010, the Company issued 250,000,000 shares of common stock for an acquisition of a subsidiary. On October 30, 2010, the acquisition was rescinded and 150,000,000 of these shares were returned and the remainder used for the purchase of a 4.95% investment in intellectual property and 500,000 of Protek Capital, Inc. series A, preferred shares at $1.00 per share for an aggregate fair value of $1,000,000.

In October 2010, the Company issued 4,305,555 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $15,500 for debt conversion.

On October 27, 2010, the Company issued 1,136,000 shares for the payment of interest with a fair market value of 7,952.

On October 27, 2010, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $56,000, of which $14,000 was for consulting services and $42,000 was for director compensation.

On November 23, 2010, the Company issued 2,150,000 common shares with a fair market value of $23,005 to pay for prepaid fees per an agreement with an investor. These fees are directly related to the utilization of a $10,000,000 line of credit (the “Line of Credit”). The Company will be able to draw down on the Line of Credit after a form S-1 Registration Statement is filed and becomes effective. The investor may hold up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of the Company.

On November 23, 2010, the Company issued 1,500,000 common shares with a fair market value of $10,500 for consulting services.

On November 23, 2010, the Company issued 7,142,857 common shares for the conversion of $10,000 of principal of a note payable.

On November 29, 2010, the Company issued 9,500,000 common shares with a fair market value of $101,650 for prepaid services per an agreement with an investor for the Line of Credit, these shares were returned on February 2, 2011.

On November 30, 2010, the Company issued 6,666,667 common shares to convert $10,000 of principal of a note payable.

On December 3, 2010, the Company issued 5,555,556 common shares to convert $10,000 of principal of a note payable.

On December 10, 2010, the Company issued 5,000,000 common shares to convert $4,500 of principal of a note payable and $2,000 of related accrued interest.

On December 14, 2010, the Company issued 8,333,333 common shares to convert $10,000 of principal of a note payable.

On January 3, 2011, the Company issued 9,090,909 common shares to convert $10,000 of a note payable.

On January 6, 2011, the Company issued 11,363,636 common shares to convert $12,500 of a note payable.

On January 12, 2011, the Company issued 7,000,000 common shares to convert $7,500 of a note payable and $1,600 of related accrued interest.

On January 24, 2011, the Company issued 12,500,000 common shares to convert $12,500 of the principal of a note payable.

On January 26, 2011, the Company issued 11,200,000 common shares with a fair market value of $22,400 for consulting services.

On February 2, 2011, the Company issued 3,561,027 common shares with a fair market value of $38,103 for prepaid consulting services, which are directly related to the utilization of the Line of Credit. The investor may hold up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of the Company.

On February 9, 2011, the Company issued 13,000,000 common shares to convert $12,064 of the principal of a note payable and 12,000,000 common shares as collateral for future note conversions on a note payable.

On February 18, 2011, the Company issued 12,500,000 common shares to convert $12,500 of the principal of a $25,000 note payable.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

None.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Results of Operations

The Company’s revenue for the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 was $~~92,808~~0 ~~with~~after ~~no comparative income for~~ the ~~year~~discontinuance ~~ended October 31, 2009 due to the sale~~ of ~~NESNJ~~Nube, ~~that~~Inc. ~~had~~in September ~~all~~2011 ~~the~~with ~~prior~~no ~~year’s~~comparative ~~operations~~income infor ~~March 2010. During~~ the year ended October 31, 2010, after the ~~Company~~sale ~~realized~~of ~~revenue~~the ~~only~~New ~~from~~Jersey ~~Nube’s~~subsidiary ~~training~~and ~~sales~~discontinuance ~~that~~of ~~commenced~~Nube, ~~in April 2010~~Inc. .

Our operating expenses for the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 totaled $1862,~~022~~808,~~360,~~ ana ~~increase~~decrease of $~~479~~73,~~883~~916 compared to the year ended October 31, ~~2009~~2010. The ~~increases~~decreases are directly related to ~~the~~a ~~utilization~~reduction in ofinvestor ~~consultants~~relations ~~for~~expenses, ~~the~~accounting ~~growth~~and ofprofessional ~~our business~~ and ~~the~~public ~~search~~company ~~for acquisitions~~expenses.

Interest expense has primarily increased as a result of the amortization of debt discount on the notes payable ofto ~~approximately~~ $~~391~~454,~~000~~494 during the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011. Management also expects that interest expense will continue to increase as borrowings for expansion ~~is received~~increase.

During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Company recognized a gain of $683,804 on the sale of its New Jersey subsidiary, as a result of the Company’s new business direction, and the operations of the subsidiary was disclosed as discontinued operations.

The Company recognized a gain on its derivative instruments of $319,935 and $184,207 during the ~~year~~years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The derivative instruments are related to the convertible promissory notes issued during the year ended October 31, 2011 and 2010. A decrease in our stock price generally results in us recording again.

The Company recognized an impairment ~~loss~~losses of $500,000 and $807,500 for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010. This was due to the impairment of the ~~construction~~Protek assets in 2011, and, the construction management contract in the amount of $627,500 since the owner of the project was not able to obtain financing and the impairment of training software and contract in the aggregate amount of $180,000 due to the uncertainty of when, if at all, the Company will be able to recognize revenues from these intangibles in 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Going Concern

The Company incurred net losses from continuing operations for the years ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 and has working capital deficiencies and accumulated deficits. The Company also had negative cash flows from operations for the years ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010. There is no guarantee the Company will be able to continue to generate enough revenue and/or raise capital to support its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to execute management’s plans to be profitable, generate positive cash flows from operations and to raise additional capital through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities. Although management continues to pursue these plans and believes it will be successful, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating such profitable operations or obtaining financing on terms acceptable to the Company.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

~~The~~Cash ~~cash~~used ~~flows from discontinued operations are included~~ in ~~cash flows from~~ operating activities ~~during~~was ~~the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009. The cash flows provided by (used in) from discontinued operations were approximately~~ $72371,~~000~~460 ~~and $(343,000)~~ during ~~the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively~~2011. ~~The absence of cash flows from the discontinued operations are not expected to affect future liquidity and capital resources.~~

~~During~~Cash ~~this~~provided ~~fiscal~~by financing ~~year,~~activities ~~the~~in ~~Company~~2011 ~~raised~~was ~~capital~~$374,641 ~~from~~which ~~affiliates~~consisted ~~and~~of ~~through~~proceeds ~~the~~from ~~issuance~~convertible of notes ~~payable and debentures~~.

~~The~~During ~~Company’s~~this ~~working capital deficit decreased by $792,995 during~~ fiscal ~~2010~~year, ~~so that at October 31, 2010~~ the ~~deficit was $1,361,937. The~~ Company ~~has~~raised ~~no liquidity and working~~ capital isfrom ~~severely~~the ~~strained,~~issuance ~~as credit lines have been fully utilized. Our working capital deficit is primarily a result~~ of ~~the~~notes ~~change~~payable in and ~~development of a new core business strategy~~debentures. ~~It is expected that there will continue to be a working capital deficit until revenues increase significantly.~~

The ~~addition~~Company’s ofcash ~~the~~position ~~construction~~was ~~management~~$3,423 ~~operations~~on ~~provides~~October 31, ~~the~~2011 ~~expansion~~and tothe ~~markets~~working capital ~~such~~deficit aswas ~~alternative~~$1,810.318. ~~energy~~The ~~processing,~~Company ~~medical~~has ~~treatment~~no liquidity and ~~agricultural~~working ~~facilities.~~capital ~~The~~is ~~contracts~~severely westrained, as credit lines have ~~and~~been /fully orutilized. ~~are~~Our ~~negotiating~~working ~~are~~capital ~~all~~deficit ~~cost~~is ~~plus~~primarily ~~based,~~a ~~with~~result of the ~~add-ons~~change ~~ranging~~in ~~from~~and ~~8-11%.~~development ~~These~~of a new ~~revenues~~core ~~are~~business strategy. It is expected that there will continue to ~~bring~~be usa ~~acceptable~~working capital deficit until revenues increase significantly. Subsequent to October 31, 2011 the Company borrowed $25,000 pursuant to a convertible debenture. Cash on hand at February 14, ~~financing~~2012 ~~opportunities~~was $381.

The table below sets forth our debt service obligations as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011.

Contractual Obligations

	Payments due by period (Dollars in thousands)
	Total		Less than1 year		1 – 3years		3 – 5years		Morethan 5years
Convertible Notes:
Loan Payable – BARS, at principalEstimated interest (a)	$ $	80,000 4,000	$ $	80,000 4,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Related Party Note – Charter Management, at principalEstimated interest (b)	$ $	400,000 31,000	$ $	400,000 31,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note – John T O’Neil, at principalEstimated interest (b)	$ $	325,000 0	$ $	325,000 0	$	—	$	—	$	—
Notes Payable – Asher, at principalEstimated interest (c)	$ $	75,000 4,000	$ $	75,000 4,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Notes Payable – Asher,at principalEstimated interest (c)	$ $	11,500 920	$ $	11,500 920	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Sweet Challenge, Inc., At PrincipalEstimated interest (d)	$ $	28,000 1,000	$ $	28,000 1,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Sweet Challenge, Inc.,At PrincipalEstimated interest (d)	$ $	60,400 4,832	$ $	60,400 4,832	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Tangiers Investors LP At PrincipalEstimated interest (e)	$ $	15,000 1,000	$ $	15,000 1,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Tangiers Investors LLPAt PrincipalEstimated interest (e)	$ $	21,050 2,105	$ $	21,050 2,105	$	—	$	—	$	—
Consulting agreements (f)	$	544,000	$	408,000	$	136,000	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Banx and Gold LLCAt PrincipalEstimated interest (g)	$ $	25,000 2,000	$ $	25,000 2,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total	$	1,183,000	$	1,047,000	$	136,000	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Norman BirminghamAt PrincipalEstimated interest (g)	$ $	18,000 1,440	$ $	18,000 1,440	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Gel PropertiesAt PrincipalEstimated interest (h)	$ $	66,250 2,105	$ $	66,250 2,105	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Redwood ManagementAt PrincipalEstimated interest (i)	$ $	25,000 3,000	$ $	25,000 3,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – GreenR U CorpAt PrincipalEstimated interest (h)	$ $	38,000 3,040	$ $	38,000 3,040	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – E LionheartAt PrincipalEstimated interest (h)	$ $	57,725 4,618	$ $	57,725 4,618	$	—	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Tripod GroupAt PrincipalEstimated interest (h)	$ $	25,000 3,000	$ $	— —	$ $	25,000 3,000	$	—	$	—
Note Payable – Magna GroupAt PrincipalEstimated interest (i)	$ $	16,666 2,000	$ $	16,666 2,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Consulting agreements (f)	$	136,000	$	136,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total	$	938,651	$	910,651	$	28,000	$	—	$	—

(a)	Interest accrues at 5% per annum.

(b)	Interest accrues at 10% per annum after the maturity date.

(c) Interest accrues at 5% per annum and at 22% after the maturity date. ~~The notes were satisfied during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.~~

(d) Interest accrues at 5% per annum after the maturity date. In January ~~2011~~2012, $12,500 of the principal was satisfied.

(e)	Interest accrues at 9% per annum.

(f)	The Company has entered into consulting contracts for various services ranging from professional services to merger and acquisition services. All of the contracts expire in February 2012.

(g)	Interest accrues at 8% per annum

(h)	Interest accrues at 6% per annum

(i)	Interest accrues at 12% per annum

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

~~Application~~• of Critical Accounting ~~Policies~~ Estimates

In preparing the financial statements the Company is required to ~~formulate~~adopt ~~working~~various ~~policies~~accounting ~~regarding valuation of assets and liabilities and to develop estimates of those values~~policies. The Company made no material changes to critical accounting policies in connection with the preparation of financial statements for the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011. Our most significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements.

~~Investments~~Long-Lived Assets

~~The~~In ~~Company reviews~~accordance ~~investments~~with ~~for~~Financial ~~impairment~~Accounting ~~annually,~~Standard orBoard (“FASB”) ~~more~~Accounting ~~frequently~~Standard ifCodification ~~impairment~~(“ASC”) ~~indicators~~Topic ~~arise~~360-10, ~~and~~the Company reviews the ~~investments~~recoverability ~~are~~of ~~written~~its ~~off~~long-lived ~~when~~assets ~~impaired.~~on ~~Impairment,~~a ifperiodic ~~any,~~basis ~~would~~in beorder ~~determined~~to ~~based~~identify onbusiness anconditions, ~~implied~~which ~~fair~~may ~~value~~indicate ~~model~~a possible impairment. The assessment for ~~determining~~potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of ~~the~~its ~~investments.~~long-lived ~~The~~assets ~~impairment~~from ~~test~~expected isfuture adiscounted ~~two-step~~cash ~~process~~flows. ~~The~~If ~~first~~the ~~step~~total ~~requires~~of ~~comparing~~the expected future discounted cash flows is less than the ~~fair~~total carrying value of ~~each~~the ~~reporting~~assets, ~~unit~~a toloss ~~its~~is ~~net~~recognized ~~book~~for ~~value.~~the ~~The~~difference ~~Company~~between ~~uses~~the ~~management~~fair ~~estimates~~value of(computed based upon the expected future discounted cash flows) toand ~~perform~~ the ~~first~~ ~~step~~carrying value of the ~~investments’ impairment test~~assets.

Estimates made by management include assumptions about future conditions such as future revenues, gross margins and operating expenses. The second step is only performed if impairment is indicated after the first step has been performed, as it involves measuring the actual impairment to the investments.

Intangible Assets

The Company reviews intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, and the intangible assets are written off when impaired. Impairment, if any, would be determined based on an implied fair value model for determining the carrying value of the intangible assets. The impairment test is a two-step process. The first step requires comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its net book value. The Company uses management estimates of future cash flows to perform the first step of the intangible assets’ impairment test. Estimates made by management include assumptions about future conditions such as future revenues, gross margins and operating expenses. The second step is only performed if impairment is indicated after the first step has been performed, as it involves measuring the actual impairment to the intangible assets. The intangible assets have been fully impaired (see discussion in the results of operations above).

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (guidance formerly reflected in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”) (“Topic 805”). Topic 805 establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. Topic 805 also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.

Derivative Instruments

The Company ~~has~~does ~~outstanding~~not ~~convertible~~use ~~debt~~derivative instruments ~~that~~to ~~contain~~hedge ~~embedded~~exposures derivative features. The Company accounts for these derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” including “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, ~~and~~cash ~~Potentially Settled in~~flow, ~~a Company’s Own Stock.” In accordance with the provisions of ASC 815~~market, ~~the~~or ~~embedded~~foreign ~~derivatives are required to be bifurcated from the debt instrument and recorded as a liability at fair value on the balance sheet~~currency. ~~Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded at each reporting period and recorded in gain on derivative instruments, a separate component of other income (expenses).~~

The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt, equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Also, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments, the Company may issue freestanding options or warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. The Company may also issue options or warrants to non-employees in connection with consulting or other services.

Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. The Company uses a binomial method option pricing model to value the derivative instruments. To the extent that the initial fair values of the freestanding and/or bifurcated derivative instrument liabilities exceed the total proceeds received, an immediate charge to income is recognized, in order to initially record the derivative instrument liabilities at their fair value.

The discount from the face value of the convertible debt or equity instruments resulting from allocating some or all of the proceeds to the derivative instruments, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to income, usually using the effective interest method.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company determined that it should record a valuation allowance for the full value of the deferred tax asset created by the net operating loss carry-forward. The primary reason for the determination was the lack of certainty as to whether the Company will carry on profitable operations in the future.

Impact of Accounting Pronouncements

~~There~~In ~~were~~June no2011, ~~recent~~the ~~accounting~~FASB ~~pronouncements~~issued ~~that~~Accounting ~~have~~Standards ~~had~~Update a2011-05, ~~material~~Presentation ~~effect~~of onComprehensive Income. This Update amended the provisions ~~Company~~of FASB ASC 220-10 by eliminating the option of reporting other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in stockholders’s ~~financial~~equity. Companies ~~position~~will have the option of presenting net income and other comprehensive income in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or presenting two separate but consecutive statements of net income and comprehensive income. The new presentation requirements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after ~~results~~December 15, 2011. The adoption of ~~operations~~this standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In ~~July~~September ~~2010~~2011, the FASB issued aAccounting ~~second~~Standards ~~exposure~~Update ~~draft~~2011-08, ~~proposing~~Testing ~~expanded~~Goodwill ~~disclosures~~for ~~regarding loss contingencies~~Impairment. This ~~proposal~~Update ~~increases~~amended the ~~number~~provisions of ~~loss~~FASB ~~contingencies~~ASC ~~subject~~350-20-35 by allowing an entity the option to make ~~disclosure~~a ~~and~~qualitative ~~requires~~evaluation ~~substantial~~about ~~quantitative~~the ~~information~~likelihood of goodwill impairment to bedetermine ~~provided~~whether ~~about~~it ~~those~~should ~~loss~~calculate ~~contingencies~~the fair value of a reporting unit. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The ~~proposal~~adoption ~~will~~of this standard is not anticipated to have noa material impact on our ~~accounting~~financial ~~for loss contingencies~~statements.

~~In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (the “Update”).~~ The ~~Update~~Company ~~provides~~does ~~amendments~~not tobelieve ~~FASB ASC 820-10~~ that ~~require~~other ~~entities~~recently toissued ~~disclose~~accounting ~~separately~~pronouncements ~~the~~will ~~amounts of significant transfers in and~~have ~~out~~a ofmaterial Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition the Update requires entities to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The disclosures related to Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements are effective for us in 2010 and the disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for us in 2011. The Update requires new disclosures only, and has no impact on ~~our~~its ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~position, results of operations, or cash flow~~statements.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

None.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Company’s financial statements, together with notes and the Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are set forth immediately following Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)	Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” (defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(e)) refers to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”). In the course of that review, the Company’s management was advised by our independent registered public accounting firm, that during its performance of review and audit procedures with respect to the financial statements for the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011, it identified a material weakness (as defined in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standard No. 5) in our internal control over financial reporting.

The material weakness consisted of inadequate staffing and supervision within the bookkeeping and accounting operations of our company. The ~~relatively~~limited ~~small~~ number of employees, all of whom are paid as consultants who have bookkeeping and accounting functions prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties and personnel is a ~~weakness~~ weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews. In light of the advice from our independent registered public ~~accounting~~ accounting firm, management has considered adding personnel to the Company’s bookkeeping and accounting operations and determined that the addition of personnel to our bookkeeping and accounting operations is not an efficient use of our limited ~~resources~~ resources at this time.

Accordingly, based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (or persons performing similar functions) have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, such controls and procedures were not effective.

(b)	Changes in internal controls.

The term “internal control over financial reporting” (defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(f)) refers to the process of a company that is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (or persons performing similar functions), has evaluated any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the year covered by this annual report, and they have concluded that there was no change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

(c)	Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We have assessed the effectiveness of those internal controls as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011, using the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) Internal Control – Integrated Framework as a basis for our assessment.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In the course of making our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, we identified one material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness consisted of:

Inadequate staffing and supervision within the accounting operations of our company. The relatively small number of employees who are responsible for accounting functions prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews.

Because of the above condition, management’s assessment is that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to ~~temporary~~ rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The officers and directors of the Company are as follows :

Name	Age		~~Position with the Company~~	~~DirectorSince~~Position with the Company		DirectorSince
David F. LaFave	55		Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Director		2010
Patrick A McGough		38		Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer			2011
Robyn Bailey	48		President – Nube, Secretary and Director		2010
David F. LaFave		56		Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Director			2010
Robyn Bailey		49		President – Nube, Secretary and Director			2010

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualify. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

~~David~~10 F. LaFave. Mr. LaFave became CEO and CFO, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors in March 2010. He resigned as CEO and President and remained a member of the Board of Directors in September and October 2010. In November 2010 he regained all of his previous titles. He has spent his career in the construction industry, operating LaFave Contractors, Inc. for most of the last 25 years.

Patrick A, McGough. Mr. McGough CEO and CFO, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors in November 2011. He has spent the majority of his career in public sector auditing and the last 12 years as a chief information officer for governmental agencies.

David F. LaFave. Mr. LaFave became CEO and CFO, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors in March 2011. He resigned as CEO and President and remained a member of the Board of Directors in September and October 2011. In November 2011 he regained all of his previous titles. He has spent his career in the construction industry, operating LaFave Contractors, Inc. for most of the last 25 years.

Robyn Bailey. Ms. Bailey became Secretary and Director in March 2011. Ms. Bailey was also appointed as President of Nube in March 2011. She has spent the past fifteen years in Information Technology primarily as a project manager/consultant/instructor. Microsoft technologies and EMC Storage technologies had been her major focus; but three years ago her work with storage technologies led her into virtualization, specializing in VMware systems. Resigned November 2011.

Nominating and Audit Committee

The Board of Directors has not appointed an Audit Committee or a Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors does not have an audit committee financial expert. The Board of Directors has not been able to recruit an audit committee financial expert to join the Board of Directors because of the Company’s poor financial condition.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a written code of ethics applicable to its executive officers. A copy of the Code of Ethics was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2003.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

None of the officers, directors or beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock failed to file on a timely basis the reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all information concerning the compensation received, for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, for services rendered to us by persons who served as our CEO during ~~2010~~2011, each of our two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of ~~2010~~2011, whom we refer to herein collectively as our “Named Executive Officers.”

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		StockAwards($) (1)		Total ($)
David F. LaFave (2)Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer		2010		37,500		—		—		37,500
Patrick A McGough		2011		0		—		—		0
Robyn Bailey (3)President-Nube and Secretary		2010		59,247		—		42,000		101,247
Chief Executive Officer/
John O'Neill (4)Chief Executive Officer		2010		—		—		—		—
Chief Financial Officer
John Grillo (5)President		2010		22,000		—		—		22,000
David F. LaFave (2)		2011		82,500		—		—		82,500
John G. Kalogeris (6)Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer		2010		5,000		—		—		5,000
Chief Executive Officer/		2010		37,500						37,500
Owen Dukes (7)Chief Executive Officer		2010		—		—		—		—
Chief Financial Officer
Robyn Bailey (3)		2011		116,184		—		—		116,184
President-Nube and Secretary		2010		59,247		—		42,000		101,247
John O’Neill (4)		2010		—		—		—		—
Chief Executive Officer
John Grillo (5)		2010		22,000		—		—		22,000
President
John G. Kalogeris (6)		2010		5,000		—		—		5,000
Chief Executive Officer/
Chief Financial Officer
Owen Dukes (7)		2010		—		—		—		—
Chief Executive Officer

~~(1)~~11 The amounts in this column reflect the total grant date fair value computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R)) for restricted stock to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock.

(21) OnThe ~~March~~amounts ~~28, 2010 Mr. LaFave entered~~ in tothis ~~employment~~column ~~agreement~~reflect ~~with~~ the ~~Company~~total togrant ~~serve~~date asfair ~~Chief~~value ~~Executive~~computed ~~Officer~~in ~~and~~accordance ~~Chief~~with ~~Financial~~Accounting ~~Officer~~Standards ~~and~~Codification ~~render~~(“ASC”) ~~services~~Topic to718 ~~the~~(formerly ~~business~~Statement ~~and affairs~~ of ~~the~~Financial ~~Corporation~~Accounting ~~and~~Standards ~~perform~~(“SFAS”) ~~activities as reasonably requested by the Corporation’s Board of Directors~~No. ~~Mr.~~123(R)) ~~LaFave~~for ~~resigned~~restricted asstock ~~CEO and CFO on September 3, 2010 pursuant~~ to ~~Stock~~purchase ~~Purchase~~shares ~~Agreement and was appointed as a Chairman~~ of the Company’s ~~Board~~common ~~of Directors and CEO on October 29, 2010 after the Stock Purchase Agreement was rescinded~~stock.

(32) On ~~July~~March 128, 2010 MsMr. ~~Bailey~~LaFave entered ~~into~~in anto employment agreement with the Company to serve as aChief ~~President~~Executive ofOfficer ~~our~~and ~~subsidiary,~~Chief ~~Nube~~Financial ~~formerly~~Officer ~~GGR.~~and Msrender ~~Bailey~~services ~~entered~~to ~~into~~the anbusiness ~~employment~~and ~~agreement~~affairs toof ~~serve~~the Corporation and perform activities as ~~President~~reasonably ~~and~~requested ~~render~~by ~~all~~the ~~services~~Corporation’s Board of ~~said~~Directors. ~~office~~Mr. toLaFave ~~the~~resigned ~~business~~as CEO and ~~affairs~~CFO ofon ~~the~~September ~~Corporation~~3, 2011 pursuant to Stock Purchase Agreement and ~~perform~~was ~~activities~~appointed as ~~reasonably~~a ~~requested~~Chairman byof ~~our~~Company’s Board of Directors and CEO on October 29, 2011 after the Stock Purchase Agreement was rescinded.

(43) MrOn July 1, 2011 Ms. ~~O'Neill~~Bailey ~~had~~entered ~~been~~into an employment agreement with the ~~Chief~~Company ~~Executive~~to ~~Officer.~~serve ~~His~~as ~~resignation~~a ~~was~~President ~~effective~~of ~~February~~our 6subsidiary, ~~2010~~Nube formerly GGR. Ms Bailey entered into an employment agreement to serve as President and render all services of said office to the business and affairs of the Corporation and perform activities as reasonably requested by our Board of Directors.

(54) Mr. ~~Grillo~~O’Neill had been the ~~President~~Chief ofExecutive ~~the Company~~Officer. His resignation was effective ~~January~~February 216, ~~2010~~2011.

(65) DrMr. ~~Kalogeris~~Grillo had been ~~Chief~~the ~~Executive~~President ~~Officer and Chief Financial Officer~~ of the Company. OnHis ~~March~~resignation ~~31,~~was ~~2010,~~effective ~~Dr.~~January ~~Kalogeris~~21, ~~passed away.~~2011

(76) MrDr. ~~Dukes~~Kalogeris ~~was~~had been Chief ~~executive~~Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. ~~from~~On ~~September~~March 431, ~~2010 through October 29~~2011, ~~2010~~Dr. ~~His~~Kalogeris ~~appointment~~passed ~~and resignation were directly related to purchase of Propalms International Ltd~~away. ~~and its subsequent rescission.~~

(7)	Mr. Dukes was Chief executive Officer of the Company from September 4, 2011 through October 29, 2011. His appointment and resignation were directly related to purchase of Propalms International Ltd. and its subsequent rescission.

Employment Agreements

All employment arrangements with executives are on an at will basis.

On ~~March~~November 2811, ~~2010~~2011, Mr. ~~LaFave~~McGough entered ininto toan employment agreement with the Company to serve as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and render services to the business and affairs of the Corporation and perform activities as reasonably requested by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Mr. LaFave resigned as CEO and CFO on September 3, 2010 pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement and was re-appointed as a Chairman of Company’s Board of Directors and CEO on October 29, 2010 after the purchase agreement was rescinded.

On ~~July~~March 128, ~~2010,~~2011 MsMr. ~~Bailey~~LaFave entered into an employment agreement with the Company to serve as ~~President~~Chief ~~of its subsidiary,~~Executive ~~Nube,~~Officer ~~formerly~~and ~~GGR.~~Chief MsFinancial ~~Bailey~~Officer ~~entered into an employment agreement to serve as President~~ and render ~~all~~ services ~~of said office~~ to the business and affairs of the Corporation and perform activities as reasonably requested by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Mr. LaFave resigned as CEO and CFO on September 3, 2011 pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement and was re-appointed as a Chairman of Company’s Board of Directors and CEO on October 29, 2011 after the purchase agreement was rescinded. Resigned November 2011.

1312

On July 1, 2011, Ms. Bailey entered into an employment agreement with the Company to serve as President of its subsidiary, Nube, formerly GGR. Ms Bailey entered into an employment agreement to serve as President and render all services of said office to the business and affairs of the Corporation and perform activities as reasonably requested by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Resigned November 2011.

Equity Grants

The following table sets forth information concerning grants of plan-based awards made by us during 2011 and 2010, to each of the Named Executive Officers:

Name

~~Grant Date~~GrantDate

All Other ~~OptionAwards~~Awards:Number ~~ofSecuritiesUnderlyingOptions~~ofSecurities

Exercise or BasePrice of OptionAwards ($)

Grant Date FairValue of Stock andOption Awards ($)(1)

Robyn Bailey

10/27/10

660,000~~,000~~

—

42,000

(1)	This amount reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock granted in the year ended October 31, 2010 in accordance with ASC Topic 718 (formerly SFAS No. 123(R)).

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding equity awards of each of the Named Executive Officers as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011:

Option Awards Name Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions:Exercisable Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions:Unexercisable OptionExercisePrice ($) OptionExpirationDate Robyn Bailey — — — —

Director Compensation

Robyn Bailey received ~~six~~sixty ~~million~~thousand shares of Company’s common stocks valued at $42,000 as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. No other director has received remuneration for services on the Board during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information concerning beneficial ownership of our capital stock outstanding at ~~March~~February 1012, ~~2011~~2012 by: (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities then outstanding; (ii) each of our directors; (iii) each of our “named executive officers” as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (iv) our current directors and executive officers, as a group.

The information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock has been presented in accordance with the rules of the Commission. Under these rules, a person may be deemed to beneficially own any shares of capital stock as to which such person, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power, and to beneficially own any shares of our capital stock as to which such person has the right to acquire voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The percentage of beneficial ownership as to any person as of a particular date is calculated by dividing (a) (i) the number of shares beneficially owned by such person plus (ii) the number of shares as to which such person has the right to acquire voting or investment power within 60 days by (b) the total number of shares outstanding as of such date, plus any shares that such person has the right to acquire from us within 60 days. Including those shares in the tables does not, however, constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of those shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting power and investment power (or shares that power with that person’s spouse) with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by that person or entity.

1413

shares that such person has the right to acquire from us within 60 days. Including those shares in the tables does not, however, constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of those shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting power and investment power (or shares that power with that person’s spouse) with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by that person or entity.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)	Common Stock Beneficially Owned					Series B Preferred Stock Beneficially Owned
	Shares		Percentage			Shares		Percentage
Directors
Robyn Bailey (3)		80,000		.3	%		—		—

Other
Blue Flame Enterprises, Inc. (2)		—		—	%		10,000		100	%

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)	Common Stock Beneficially Owned					Series B Preferred StockBeneficially Owned
	Shares		Percentage			Shares		Percentage
Directors
Robyn Bailey		8,000,000		3.0	%		—		—
Other
Blue Flame Enterprises, Inc.		—		—	%		10,000		100	%

(1)	The address of each stockholder, unless otherwise noted, is c/o NX Global Company, Inc., 16238 F-108 Ranch Rd, Austin, TX 78717

(2) The address of the preferred stockholder is ~~1950~~318 ~~Oakbrooke~~Francis Ave, ~~Howell~~Lansing, MI ~~48845.~~

(3)	Resigned in November 2011.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information set forth in the table below regarding equity compensation plans (which include individual compensation arrangements) was determined as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011.

Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights

Weighted averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights

Number of securitiesremaining availablefor future issuanceunder equitycompensation plans

Number ofsecuritiesto beissueduponexercise ofoutstandingoptions,warrantsand rights

Weightedaverageexerciseprice ofoutstandingoptions,warrantsand rights

Number ofsecuritiesremainingavailable forfutureissuanceunder equitycompensationplans

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

—

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

—

121,~~158~~376,~~703~~413

Total

—

121,~~158~~376,~~703~~413

(1)

The Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan in 2007. The Plan authorizes the Board to issue up to 1,500,000 common shares during the ten year period of the Plan. The shares may be awarded to employees or directors of NX Global or its subsidiaries as well as to consultants to those entities. The shares may be awarded as outright grants or in the form of options, restricted stock or performance shares.

(2) The Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Professional Consultant Stock Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan authorizes the Board to issue up to 10100,000~~,000~~ common shares during the one year period of the ~~2010~~2011 Plan. The shares may be awarded to professionals and consultants of NX Global or its subsidiaries. All shares under the 2010 Plan have been issued.

(3) On January 11, 2011, Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2011 Consultant Stock Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”). Under the terms of the 2011 Plan, the Company reserved 20,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued during the 2011 Plan’s one-year term. Professionals and consultants who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan. 112,000 shares have been issued under the plan. 1,596,587 shares remain issuable under the plan.

1514

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Party Transactions

Charter Management, LLC (“Charter”) had funded the operations of the Company with a credit facility. The balance payable to Charter before the reduction described below was $1,347,318. With the execution of the agreement to sell the Company’s New Jersey Subsidiary entered into on January 21, 2010 (the “Agreement”), the debt was extinguished after two principal payments totaling $57,000 and the issuance of a new convertible promissory note to John O’Neill, the former CEO of the Company and owner of Charter, for $400,000. As a result of the extinguishment, the debt was reduced by $890,318, which was reflected as a reduction on the consolidated balance sheet to additional paid-in capital since it was a debt reduction from a related party. Charter was related to the Company through common ownership, but as of May 5, 2010, these parties are no longer affiliates of the Company due to the Agreement. This debt has been reduced to $325,000.

Director Independence

None of the members of our Board of Directors are independent, as “independent” is defined in the rules of the NASDAQ National Market System.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Our principal accountant for the audit and review of our annual and quarterly financial statements, respectively, during ~~each~~portions of the past two fiscal years was Friedman LLP. Moreover, the following ~~table~~ table shows the fees paid or accrued by us to Friedman LLP during ~~this~~2010 ~~period~~and the first quarter of 2011. The remaining balance of 2011 was paid to Kingery and Crouse LLP

Type of Service	~~2010~~2011		~~2009~~2010
Audit Fees (1)	$	~~125~~82,~~676~~500	$	30125,~~802~~676
Audit-Related Fees (2)		~~3,500~~—		—3,500
Tax Fees (3)		~~6,375~~—		6,~~075~~375
All Other Fees (4)		—		—
Total	$	~~135~~82,~~551~~500	$	36135,~~877~~551

(1)	Comprised of the audit of our annual financial statements and reviews of our quarterly financial statements.

(2)	Comprised of services rendered in connection with registration statements.

(3)	Comprised of services for tax compliance and tax return preparation.

(4)	Fees related to other filings with the SEC.

In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee, or other governing body established policies and procedures under which all audit and non-audit services performed by our principal accountants must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee, or other governing body. As provided in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and non-audit services to be provided after May 6, 2003 must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, or other governing body in accordance with these policies and procedures.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

3-a		Articles of Incorporation filed February 17, 1998. (1)
3-a(1)		Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed October 29, 2001. (1)
3-a(2)		Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation, effective as of November 20, 2006 – filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
3-b		Bylaws. (1)
10-a		Master Agreement with Charter Management LLC. (2)
14		Code of Ethics and Business Conduct - Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10KSB for the year ended October 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – CEO
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – CFO
32		Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications

1615

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – CEO
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification – CFO
32		Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications

(1)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-SB on November 14, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.

(2)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Amended Registration Statement on Form 10-SB on November 6, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

1716

NX GLOBAL, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 2011			F2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2010 and 2009			F3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2011 and 2010			F3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009			F4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010			F4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009			F5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010			F5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009			F6 - F7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010			F6 - F7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			F8 - ~~F20~~F21

~~REPORT~~To OFThe ~~INDEPENDENT~~Board ~~REGISTERED~~of ~~PUBLIC~~Directors ~~ACCOUNTING~~and ~~FIRM~~Stockholders

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

NX Global, Inc.

WeREPORT ~~have~~OF ~~audited~~INDEPENDENT ~~the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NX Global Company, Inc. and subsidiaries, formerly known as~~REGISTERED ~~National~~PUBLIC ~~Energy~~ACCOUNTING ~~Services~~FIRM Company, Inc. (the “Company”), as of October 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We ~~conducted~~have ~~our~~audited ~~audits~~the inaccompanying ~~accordance~~consolidated ~~with~~balance ~~standards~~sheet of ~~the~~NX ~~Public~~Global, ~~Company~~Inc. ~~Accounting Oversight Board~~ (~~United~~“the ~~States~~Company”). ~~Those~~as ~~standards~~of October 31, ~~require~~2011, ~~that we plan~~ and ~~perform~~ the ~~audit~~related ~~to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the~~ consolidated ~~financial~~ statements ~~are free~~ of ~~material misstatement. The Company is not required to have~~operations, ~~nor~~changes ~~were~~in weshareholders’ ~~engaged to perform~~deficit, anand ~~audit~~cash offlows ~~its~~for ~~internal~~the ~~control~~year ~~over~~then ~~financial reporting~~ended. These ~~Our~~consolidated ~~audits included consideration of internal control over~~ financial ~~reporting~~statements ~~as a basis for designing audit procedures that~~ are ~~appropriate in~~ the ~~circumstances,~~responsibility ~~but not for the purpose~~ of ~~expressing an opinion on~~ the ~~effectiveness of the~~ Company’s ~~internal~~ ~~control~~management. ~~over~~Our ~~financial~~responsibility ~~reporting.~~is ~~Accordingly,~~to we express noan ~~such~~ opinion. ~~An audit also includes examining,~~ on athese ~~test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the~~ consolidated financial statements, ~~assessing~~based ~~the~~on ~~accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that~~ our ~~audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion~~audit.

InWe conducted our ~~opinion,~~audit in accordance with the ~~consolidated~~standards ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~the ~~referred~~Public toCompany ~~above~~Accounting ~~present~~Oversight ~~fairly,~~Board in(United ~~all~~States). ~~material~~Those ~~respects,~~standards require that we plan and perform the ~~consolidated~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial ~~position~~statements are free of material ~~the~~misstatement. The Company asis ofnot ~~October 31~~required to have, ~~2010~~nor ~~and~~were ~~2009,~~we ~~and~~engaged ~~the~~to ~~consolidated~~perform ~~results~~an audit of its ~~operations~~internal ~~and~~control ~~cash~~over ~~flows~~financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the ~~years~~circumstances, ~~then~~but ~~ended~~not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in ~~conformity~~the ~~with~~financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles ~~generally~~used ~~accepted~~and insignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the ~~United~~overall ~~States~~financial ofstatement ~~America~~presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~The~~In ~~accompanying~~our opinion, the consolidated financial statements ~~have~~referred ~~been~~to ~~prepared~~above ~~assuming~~present ~~that~~fairly, ~~the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed~~ in ~~Note~~all ~~1 to~~material ~~the consolidated financial statements~~respects, the ~~Company~~financial ~~incurred~~position ~~net~~of ~~losses~~NX ~~from continuing operations for the years ended October 31~~Global, ~~2010~~Inc. ~~and 2009 and working capital deficiencies and accumulated deficits~~ as of October 31, ~~2010 and 2009. The Company also had negative cash flows from operations for the years ended October 31~~2011, ~~2010~~ and ~~2009. There is no guarantee~~ the ~~Company~~results ~~will~~of beits ~~able~~operations ~~to generate enough revenue~~ and~~/or~~ ~~raise capital to support~~ its ~~operations.~~cash ~~These~~flows ~~conditions raise~~for ~~substantial doubt about~~ the ~~Company’s~~year ~~ability~~then ended toin ~~continue~~conformity ~~as a going concern. Management’s plans~~ with ~~regard~~accounting toprinciples ~~these~~generally ~~matters~~accepted ~~are also described~~ in ~~Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from~~ the ~~outcome~~United States of ~~these uncertainties~~America.

/The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has experienced losses of $1,501,541 and $1,208,633 for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010. In addition, the Company has working capital and stockholder deficits of $1,810,318 at October 31, 2011. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s/ ~~Friedman~~plans ~~LLP~~regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~New~~/s/ ~~York~~Kingery & Crouse, NYP.A. Certified Public Accountants Tampa, Florida February 14, 2012

March 11, 2011

NX GLOBAL ~~COMPANY~~, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	OCTOBER 31,2010			OCTOBER 31,2009
	OCTOBER 31,2011			OCTOBER 31,2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	~~242~~3,423		$	~~4,724~~242
Accounts receivable		~~15,575~~—			7115,~~954~~575
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		~~72,856~~255			2872,~~985~~856
Total current assets		883,~~673~~678			~~105~~88,~~663~~673
Investments		~~1,000,000~~—			—1,000,000
Property and equipment, net		—			18,155
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,678		$	1,088,673
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,088,673		$	123,818
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable - other	$	179,283		$	102,500
Convertible debentures, net	$	680,696		$	179,283
Notes payable-related parties		276,692			1,339,558
Convertible debentures - related parties, net		—			276,692
Derivative liability		717,043			—
Derivative liability, net		632,749			717,043
Settlement liability		—			437,020
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		500,551			277,592
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		277,592			381,517
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,813,996			1,450,610
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,450,610			2,260,595
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Preferred stock, Series A, $.001 par value, 500,000 sharesauthorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2010 andOctober 31, 2009		—			—
Preferred stock, Series A, $.001 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010		—			—
Preferred stock, Series B, $.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 10,000shares and 0 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2010 and 2009		10			—
Preferred stock, Series B, $.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 10,000 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2011 and 2010		10			10
Common Stock, $.001 par value; 950,000,000 shares authorized;186,352,401 and 32,210,846 issued and outstanding October31, 2010 and 2009		186,352			32,211
Common Stock, $.001 par value; 1,900,000,000 shares authorized; 15,519,296 and 1,863,524 issued and outstanding October 31, 2011 and 2010		15,519			1,863
Additional Paid-in-Capital		6,~~076~~303,~~660~~653			36,~~247~~261,~~338~~149
Accumulated deficit		(68,~~624~~129,~~959~~500	)		(56,~~416~~624,~~326~~959	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(~~361~~1,~~937~~810,318	)		(2361,~~136,777~~937	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	13,~~088,673~~678		$	~~123~~1,~~818~~088,673

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NX GLOBAL ~~COMPANY~~, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

	OCTOBER 31,2010			OCTOBER 31,2009
	OCTOBER 31,2011			OCTOBER 31,2010
Revenues
Training revenue	$	92,808		$	—
Revenue	$	—		$	—
Operating expenses
General and administrative expenses		1862,~~022,360~~808			~~542~~936,~~477~~724
Other Income (Expenses)
Other (Income) Expenses
Gain on sale of subsidiary		~~683,804~~—			—(683,804	)
Gain on derivative instruments		~~184~~(319,~~207~~935	)		—(184,207	)
Impairment loss		~~(807,~~500,000	)		—807,500
Interest expense		(411,789	)		(24,599	)
Interest and fee expense		454,494			411,789
		(351,278	)		(24,599	)
		634,559			351,278
Loss From Continuing Operations		(1,~~280~~497,~~830~~367	)		(~~567~~1,~~076~~288,002	)
Income (loss) From Discontinued Operations		72(7,~~197~~174	)		~~(24~~79,~~033~~369	)
Net loss	$	(1,~~208~~504,~~633~~541	)	$	(~~591~~1,~~109~~208,633	)
Earnings (Loss) Per Share, Basic and Diluted
From Continuing Operations	$	(0.0120	)	$	(01.0249	)
From Discontinued Operations		*(.00	)		*.09
Net loss	$	(0.0120	)	$	(01.0240	)
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding, Basic and Diluted		867,~~194~~603,~~931~~037			30861,~~866,348~~949

* less than $(0.005)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NX GLOBAL ~~COMPANY~~, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

											Additional
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						AdditionalPaid-inCapital			AccumulatedDeficit			Total
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						Paid-in			Accumulated
Description	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount
Description	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Total
Balance October 31, 2009		—		—		322,106		$	322		$	3,279,227		$	(5,416,326	)	$	(2,136,777	)
Balance October 31, 2008		—	$	—		29,835,601		$	29,835		$	3,186,703		$	(4,825,217	)	$	(1,608,679	)
Shares issued for services		—		—		319,290			319			496,281			—			496,600
Issuance of common stock for services		—		—		525,245			526			34,985			—			35,511
Shares issued to satisfy accrued interest		—		—		11,360			11			7,941			—			7,952
Stock issued for subscription agreement		—		—		1,850,000			1,850			25,650			—			27,500
Shares issued for cash		—		—		15,000			15			3,318			—			3,333
Net loss for year ended October 31, 2009		—		—		—			—			—			(591,109	)		(591,109	)
Shares issued for prepaid consulting fees		—		—		77,710			78			107,942			—			108,020
Balance October 31, 2009		—		—		32,210,846			32,211			3,247,338			(5,416,326	)		(2,136,777	)
Shares issued for acquisition		—		—		60,000			60			179,940			—			180,000
Issuance of common stock for services		—		—		31,929,000			31,929			464,671			—			496,600
Shares issued for acquisition of intangibles		10,000		10		—			—			627,490			—			627,500
Issuance of common stock to satisfy accrued interest		—		—		1,136,000			1,136			6,816			—			7,952
Shares issued for conversion of debt		—		—		58,056			58			37,942			—			38,000
Issuance of common in capital raise		—		—		1,500,000			1,500			1,833			—			3,333
Settlement of related party notes		—		—		—			—			890,318			—			890,318
Issuance of common stock for consulting fees paid in advance		—		—		7,771,000			7,771			100,249			—			108,020
Derivative liability valuation loss on related party notes		—		—		—			—			(368,250	)		—			(368,250	)
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of subsidiary		—		—		6,000,000			6,000			174,000			—			180,000
Shares issued for investment		—		—		1,000,000			1,000			999,000			—			1,000,000
Acquisition of intangible assets		10,000		10		—			—			627,490			—			627,500
Stock issued for conversion of debt		—		—		5,805,555			5,805			32,195			—			38,000
Settlement of notes payable to related parties		—		—		—			—			890,318			—			890,318
Derivative liability valuation loss on note payable to related party		—		—		—			—			(368,250	)		—			(368,250	)
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of investment		—		—		100,000,000			100,000			900,000			—			1,000,000
Net loss for year ended October 31, 2010		—		—		—			—			—			(1,208,633	)		(1,208,633	)
Balance October 31, 2010		10,000	$	10		186,352,401		$	186,352		$	6,076,660		$	(6,624,959	)	$	(361,937	)
Balance October 31, 2011		10,000		10		1,863,522			1,863			6,261,149			(6,624,959	)		(361,937	)
Shares issued for services		—		—		252,000			252			48,248			—			48,500
Shares issued for conversion of debt and interest		—		—		13,194,188			13,194			346,966			—			360,160
Shares returned for investment		—		—		(500,000	)		(500	)		(499,500	)		—			(500,000	)
Shares issued for commitment fee		—		—		137,851			138			147,362			—			147,500
Shares issued for future conversions		—		—		571,735			572			(572	)		—			—
Loss for the year ended October 31, 2011		—		—		—			—			—			(1,504,541	)		(1,504,541	)
Balance October 31, 2011		10,000	$	10		15,519,296		$	15,519		$	6,303,653		$	(8,129,500	)	$	(1,810,318	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NX GLOBAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

	October 31, 2010			October 31, 2009
	October 31,2011			October 31,2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(1,~~208~~504,~~633~~541	)	$	(~~591~~1,~~109~~208,633	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to netcash used in operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Impairment loss		807,500			—
Depreciation		—			5,477
Depreciation		5,477			10,592
Impairment		500,000			807,500
Common stock issued for services		~~496~~48,~~600~~500			35496,~~511~~600
Gain on sale of subsidiary		(683,804	)		—
Common stock issued for interest and fees		153,410			—
Gain on derivative instruments		(184,207	)		—
Gain on sale of subsidiary		—			(683,804	)
Amortization of debt discount		391,475			—
Gain on derivative instrument		(319,935	)		(184,207	)
Debt issued for expenses		151,470			—
Amortization of debt discount		288,271			391,475
Changes in assets and liabilities
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable		5615,~~379~~575			~~(24~~56,~~238~~379	)
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets		6472,~~149~~601			~~(16~~64,~~002~~149	)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		~~188~~223,~~907~~189			~~242~~188,~~731~~907
Increase (Decrease) Settlement liability		~~2,572~~—			—2,572
Net cash used in operating activities		(63,585	)		(342,515	)
Total adjustments		1,133,081			1,145,048
Net cash used in operating activities		(371,460	)		(63,585	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary		10—			—10
Acquisition of property and equipment		—			(11,060	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		—			10
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		10			(11,060	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayments on note payable - bank		—			(2,378	)
Common shares issued for cash		—			3,333
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties		~~7,760~~—			~~283~~7,~~099~~760
Repayments of notes payable - related parties		~~(57,000~~—	)		(5957,~~158~~000	)
Proceeds from notes payable - other		105,000			102,500
Proceeds from convertible debentures		374,641			105,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		3,333			27,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		374,641			59,093
Net cash provided by financing activities		59,093			351,563
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS		3,181			(4,482	)
NET DECREASE IN CASH		(4,482	)		(2,012	)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning		242			4,724
CASH-BEGINNING OF YEAR		4,724			6,736
Cash and cash equivalents - ending	$	3,423		$	242
CASH-END OF YEAR	$	242		$	4,724

NX GLOBAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ~~(CONTINUED)~~

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

	October 31, 2010		October 31, 2009
	October 31,2011		October 31,2010
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWINFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR:
Interest expense	$	~~2,267~~—	$	18,367
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING ANDFINANCING ACTIVITIES:
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of subsidiary settled in common stock	$	~~180,000~~—	$	—180,000
Settlement of notes payable to related parties	$	~~890,318~~—	$	—890,318
Derivative liability and debt discount on notes payable to related parties	$	~~768,250~~—	$	—768,250
Repayment of notes payable with common stock	$	38354,~~000~~250	$	—38,000
Repayment of accrued interest with common stock	$	~~7,952~~—	$	—7,952
Debt discount on issuance of notes payable - other	$	133,000	$	—
Debt discount on issuance of derivatives	$	235,641	$	133,000
Acquisition of intangible assets	$	~~627,500~~—	$	—627,500
Acquisition of investments settled in common stock	$	~~1,000,000~~—	$	—1,000,000
Note payable issued to satisfy accrued consulting fees	$	28,000	$	—
Common stock returned and cancelled related to investment	$	500,000	$	—
Consulting fees paid in advance with common stock	$	108,020	$	—
Common stock issued as collateral	$	572	$	—
Note payable issued to satisfy accrued consulting fees	$	—	$	28,000
Consulting fees paid in advance with common stock	$	—	$	108,020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NX GLOBAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, ~~2010~~2011 AND ~~2009~~2010

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS

NX Global, Inc., formerly known as National Energy Services Company, Inc. (“NX Global”) was incorporated on February 17, 1998 in Nevada as Coastal Enterprises, Inc. to engage in an internet-related business. NX Global and National Energy Services Company, Inc., an unaffiliated New Jersey corporation formed in 1995 (“NESNJ”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange, dated January 19, 2001, pursuant to which the shareholders of NESNJ on January 19, 2001 were issued 10100,000~~,000~~ shares of common stock of NX Global, par value $0.001 in exchange for 100% of the issued ~~and~~ and outstanding shares of NESNJ, which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. For accounting purposes, the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition. In September ~~2010~~2011, the Company changed its name to NX Global, Inc.

NX Global together with its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”), ~~are~~intends ~~engaged~~to inoperate ~~operating~~ three divisions and ~~various~~ various subsidiaries within each division which will either be created by the Company or to be purchased ~~for more rapid growth~~. The divisions include Renewable Energy Project Management, Renewable Energy Product Sales and Green Internet Technologies.

Renewable Energy Project Management will initially consist of project management and marketing of those services to solar/thermal, bio-fuels and waste to energy project owners. ~~Current~~Various ~~various~~ joint ventures investments are being ~~negotiated~~considered to enable the Company to get into the markets ~~with signed projects~~. These projects will include bio-fuel from algae and from pyrolisis of tires, pyrolisis of municipal solid waste to energy, and combination operations of solar/thermal and animal waste pyrolisis.

The Renewable Energy Product Sales division ~~will~~intends to market to the end user products that reduce the energy cost to home and commercial building users ~~to pennies on the dollars they previously spent~~ and provide revenue for the company through the sale of excess energy to the grid. Additional products will include lighting and water systems for commercial structures~~, some that had been marketed by the Company’s former New Jersey subsidiary~~.

Except for the Internet Technologies Service and Training Division that became active in April, 2010, none of the divisions were active during the year ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011. The divisions were formed in February 2010, except for the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Applied Concepts for Energy Corp. (“ACEC”), which was previously formed and had no operations through October 31, ~~2010~~2011.

On January 21, 2010, the Company acquired an agreement to manage the construction of a solar/thermal site in California (the “Agreement”). The Agreement required former management to transfer to the seller 13130,000~~,000~~ shares of the common shares they held, the Company to issue 10,000 shares of Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock with a stated value of $400,000 and a voting preference as if the holder held 50.1% of the outstanding votes of the Company and the settlement of the related party notes payable of approximately $1.3 million with a cash payment of $57,000 and the issuance of a $400,000 convertible promissory note. The settlement of the related party notes payable resulted in an effective reduction of $890,318 in related party debt. (see Note 6).

The Agreement also required the resignation of all officers and directors at that time and the placement of a new director and officer to operate the Company. Further requirements caused the 13,000,000 common shares and 10,000 shares of Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to be issued in accordance with the acquisition to be placed in escrow until all sales tax debts had been paid or negotiated for payment and the payment of certain debts to prior management and a counsel to the Company. The shares in escrow were released on April 30, 2010. The Company did not declare any preferred stock dividends for the year ended October 31, 2010.

NXThe ~~GLOBAL~~Agreement also required the resignation of all officers and directors at that time and the placement of a new director and officer to operate the Company. Further requirements caused the 130,000 ~~INC~~common shares and 10,000 shares of Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to be issued in accordance with the acquisition to be placed in escrow until all sales tax debts had been paid or negotiated for payment and the payment of certain debts to prior management and a counsel to the Company. The shares in escrow were released on April 30, 2010. The Company did not declare any preferred stock dividends for the year ended October 31, 2011 or 2010.

~~NOTES~~In TOMarch ~~CONSOLIDATED~~2010, ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~Company purchased 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Nube, Inc. (~~CONTINUED~~“Nube”), formerly known as Global Green Resources, Inc. (“GGR”) for 60,000 restricted common shares with a value of $180,000. Nube’s assets consisted of its training software and contract and it had no liabilities. Nube provides training programs for green technologies such as cloud computing and data virtualization. Nube had no revenues until April 2010, at which time it started to recognize revenues from providing training activities. In November 2010, Global Green Resources, Inc. changed its name to Nube, Inc. On September 30, 2011 Nube ceased operations (see Note 11).

~~FOR~~These ~~THE~~consolidated ~~YEARS~~financial ~~ENDED~~statements ~~OCTOBER~~reflect ~~31,~~the ~~2010~~sale ~~AND~~of ~~2009~~the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary and discontinuance of the operations of Nube (see Note 11 – Discontinued Operations and Sale of Subsidiary).

In March 2010, the Company purchased 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Nube, Inc. (“Nube”), formerly known as Global Green Resources, Inc. (“GGR”) for 6,000,000 restricted common shares with a stock value of $180,000. Nube’s assets consisted of its training software and contract and it had no liabilities. Nube provides training programs for green technologies such as cloud computing and data virtualization. Nube had no revenues until April 2010, at which time it started to recognize revenues from providing training activities. In November 2010, Global Green Resources, Inc. changed its name to Nube, Inc.

These consolidated financial statements reflect the sale of the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary (see Note 11 – Discontinued Operations and Sale of Subsidiary).

Going Concern

The Company incurred net losses from continuing operations of $1,501,541 and $1,208,633 for the years ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 and has working capital deficiencies of $1,810,318 and ~~accumulated~~$1,361,937 and stockholder deficits of $1,810,318 and $361,937 as of October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~ 2010. The Company also had negative cash flows from operations for the years ended October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010. There is no guarantee the Company will be able to continue to generate enough revenue and/or raise capital to support its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s plans include seeking additional debt or equity financing and pursuing the joint venture discussed in Note 12, and seeking operating businesses with which to merge.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned ~~subsidiaries,~~subsidiary ~~Nube and~~ ACEC. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company receives revenues according to agreements with its customers. Revenue is recognized when services are rendered, evidence of a contract exists, the price is fixed or reasonably determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

NXRevenue ~~GLOBAL,~~Recognition ~~INC.~~

~~NOTES~~In TOgeneral, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~the ~~FINANCIAL~~Company ~~STATEMENTS~~records ~~(CONTINUED)~~revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

~~OCTOBER~~Revenue ~~31,~~is recognized ~~2010~~at ~~AND~~the ~~2009~~time the product is delivered or the service is performed. Provision for sales returns will be estimated based on the Company’s historical return experience.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect. When needed, an allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on information on the collectability of specific accounts. Accounts are considered past due or delinquent based on contractual terms, how recently payments have been received and management’s judgment of collectability. The Company presently has written off all accounts receivable that are more than twelve months old and others that were not expected to be collected. At October 31, 2010, no allowance had been established.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash balances in banks are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation subject to certain limitations. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Investments

The Company reviews investments for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, and the investments are written off when impaired. Impairment, if any, would be determined based on an implied fair value model for determining the carrying value of the investments. The impairment test is a two-step process. The first step requires comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its net book value. The Company uses management estimates of future cash flows to perform the first step of the investments’ impairment test.

Property and Equipment

All property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, generally three, five or seven years, using the straight-line method. Upon sale or retirement, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from their respective accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations. Repairs and maintenance charges, which do not increase the useful lives of the assets, are charged to operations as incurred.

~~Intangible~~Long-Lived Assets

~~The~~In ~~Company~~accordance ~~reviews~~with ~~intangible~~Financial ~~assets~~Accounting ~~for~~Standard ~~impairment~~Board ~~annually,~~(“FASB”) orAccounting ~~more~~Standard ~~frequently~~Codification if(“ASC”) ~~impairment~~Topic ~~indicators arise~~360-10, the ~~and~~Company reviews the ~~intangible~~recoverability of its long-lived assets ~~are~~on ~~written~~a ~~off~~periodic ~~when~~basis ~~impaired.~~in ~~Impairment,~~order ifto ~~any,~~identify ~~would~~business ~~be determined~~conditions, ~~based~~which onmay anindicate ~~implied~~a ~~fair~~possible ~~value~~impairment. ~~model~~The assessment for ~~determining~~potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of ~~the~~its ~~intangible~~long-lived assets from expected future discounted cash flows. ~~The~~If ~~impairment~~the ~~test~~total isof athe ~~two-step~~expected ~~process.~~future ~~The~~discounted ~~first~~cash ~~step~~flows ~~requires~~is ~~comparing~~less than the ~~fair~~total carrying value of ~~each~~the ~~reporting~~assets, ~~unit~~a toloss ~~its~~is ~~net~~recognized ~~book~~for ~~value.~~the ~~The~~difference ~~Company~~between ~~uses~~the ~~management~~fair ~~estimates~~value of(computed based upon the expected future discounted cash flows) toand ~~perform~~ the ~~first~~carrying ~~step~~value of the ~~intangible~~ assets~~’ impairment test~~.

~~Estimates~~On ~~made~~October by31, ~~management~~2010, ~~include~~the ~~assumptions~~Company ~~about~~recognized ~~future~~an ~~conditions~~impairment ~~such~~loss asof ~~future revenues~~$806,500 ~~gross~~due ~~margins~~to ~~and~~(1) ~~operating~~the ~~expenses.~~impairment ~~The~~of ~~second~~the ~~step~~construction ismanagement ~~only~~contract ~~performed~~in ifthe ~~impairment~~moment isof ~~indicated~~$627,500 ~~after~~since the owner of the project was not able to obtain financing and (2) the ~~first~~impairment ~~step~~of ~~has~~training ~~been~~software ~~performed~~and contract in the aggregate amount of $180,000 asdue itto ~~involves~~uncertainty ~~measuring~~of when, if at all, the ~~actual~~Company ~~impairment~~will be able to ~~the~~recognize ~~intangible~~revenues ~~assets~~from the intangibles.

On October 31, ~~2010~~2011, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $~~807,~~500 ~~due to (1) the impairment of the construction management contract in the amount of $627~~,~~500 since the owner of the project was not able to obtain financing and (2) the impairment of training software and contract in the aggregate amount of $180,~~000 ~~due~~related to ~~uncertainty of when, if at all,~~ the ~~Company~~intellectual ~~will~~property be(see ~~able~~Note ~~to recognize revenues from the intangibles~~4).

F10

NXEstimates ~~GLOBAL~~made by management include assumptions about future conditions such as future revenues, ~~INC~~gross margins and operating expenses. The second step is only performed if impairment is indicated after the first step has been performed, as it involves measuring the actual impairment to the intangible assets.

~~NOTES~~On TOOctober 31, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~2010, ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~Company recognized an impairment loss of $807,500 due to (~~CONTINUED~~1) the impairment of the construction management contract in the amount of $627,500 since the owner of the project was not able to obtain financing and (2) the impairment of training software and contract in the aggregate amount of $180,000 due to uncertainty of when, if at all, the Company will be able to recognize revenues from the intangibles.

OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“Topic 805”). Topic 805 establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. Topic 805 also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Earnings (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of convertible debt and preferred stock. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented.

The following table shows the approximate number of common stock equivalents outstanding at October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 that could potentially dilute basic income per share, but were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

	Outstanding atOctober 31,
	2010		2009
	2011		2010
Warrants		1,000,000		1,000,000
Preferred stock – Series B		4440,~~444~~000,~~444~~000		044,444,444
Convertible notes – other		29134,~~653~~753,~~336~~619		029,653,336
Convertible note – related party		~~100,042,105~~—		0100,042,105
Total		175,~~139~~753,~~885~~619		1175,~~000~~139,~~000~~885

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The established fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities that are not active; and model-driven valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Valuations may be obtained from, or corroborated by, third-party pricing services.

F11

Level 3: Unobservable inputs to measure fair value of assets and liabilities for which there is little, if any market activity at the measurement date, using reasonable inputs and assumptions based upon the best information at the time, to the extent that inputs are available without undue cost and effort.

The Company uses appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. When available the Company measures fair value using Level 1 inputs because they generally provide the most reliable evidence of fair value. Level 3 inputs are used only when Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments are comprised of current assets, current liabilities and investments. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to their short term nature. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accruals, convertible debentures and convertible debenture derivative liabilities reported in the consolidated balance sheets ~~for~~approximate ~~investments~~fair ~~approximate~~value because of their short term maturities The fair value of the Company’s investments at October 31, 2010, approximates the carrying value since the investments were acquired on October 29, 2010.

Derivative Instruments

The Company ~~has~~does ~~outstanding~~not ~~convertible~~use ~~debt~~derivative instruments ~~that~~to ~~contain~~hedge ~~derivative~~exposures features. The Company accounts for these derivatives in accordance with FASB ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” including “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, ~~and~~cash ~~Potentially Settled in~~flow, ~~a Company’s Own Stock.” In accordance with the provisions of ASC 815~~market, ~~the~~or ~~embedded~~foreign ~~derivatives are required to be bifurcated from the debt instrument and recorded as a liability at fair value on the balance sheet~~currency. ~~Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded at each reporting period and recorded in gain on derivative instruments, a separate component of other income (expenses).~~

F12

Income Taxes

~~F11~~Stock-Based Compensation

~~Table~~The ofCompany ~~Contents~~accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 Stock Compensation. This Statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements. The Statement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. The Statement also establishes fair value as the measurement objective for transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services from non-employees in share-based payment transactions.

NX GLOBAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~July~~June ~~2010~~2011, the FASB issued aAccounting ~~second~~Standards ~~exposure~~Update ~~draft~~2011-05, ~~proposing~~Presentation ~~expanded~~of ~~disclosures~~Comprehensive ~~regarding~~Income. This ~~loss~~Update ~~contingencies.~~amended ~~This~~the ~~proposal~~provisions ~~increases~~of FASB ASC 220-10 by eliminating the ~~number~~option of ~~loss~~reporting other ~~contingencies~~comprehensive ~~subject~~income toin ~~disclosure~~the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. Companies will have the option of presenting net income and other comprehensive income in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or presenting ~~requires~~two ~~substantial~~separate ~~quantitative~~but ~~information~~consecutive tostatements beof ~~provided~~net ~~about~~income ~~those~~and ~~loss~~comprehensive ~~contingencies~~income. The new presentation requirements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The ~~proposal~~adoption ~~will~~of this standard is not anticipated to have noa material impact on our ~~accounting~~financial ~~for loss contingencies~~statements.

In ~~January~~September ~~2010~~2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ~~(“ASU”) No. 2010~~2011-0608, ~~“Improving~~Testing ~~Disclosures~~Goodwill ~~about~~for ~~Fair~~Impairment. This ~~Value~~Update ~~Measurements”~~amended (the ~~“Update”).~~provisions ~~The~~of ~~Update provides amendments to~~ FASB ASC ~~820~~350-1020-35 ~~that~~by ~~require~~allowing ~~entities~~an toentity ~~disclose~~the ~~separately~~option ~~the~~to ~~amounts~~make ofa ~~significant~~qualitative ~~transfers~~evaluation inabout ~~and~~the ~~out~~likelihood of ~~Level~~goodwill 1impairment ~~and~~to ~~Level~~determine 2whether it should calculate the fair value ~~measurements~~of ~~and~~a ~~describe~~reporting ~~the~~unit. The ~~reasons~~amendments ~~for~~are ~~the~~effective ~~transfers.~~for Inannual ~~addition~~and ~~the~~interim ~~Update requires~~goodwill ~~entities~~impairment totests ~~present~~performed ~~separately~~for ~~information~~fiscal ~~about~~years ~~purchases,~~beginning ~~sales,~~after ~~issuances~~December 15, ~~and~~2011. Early ~~settlements~~adoption inis ~~the~~permitted, ~~reconciliation~~ including for ~~fair~~annual ~~value~~and ~~measurements~~interim ~~using~~goodwill ~~significant~~impairment ~~unobservable~~tests ~~inputs~~performed ~~(Level~~as ~~3).~~of ~~The~~a ~~disclosures~~date ~~related~~before toSeptember 15, ~~Level~~2011, 1if ~~and~~an ~~Level~~entity’s ~~2 fair~~financial ~~value~~statements ~~measurements are effective~~ for ~~us in 2010 and~~ the ~~disclosures~~most ~~related~~recent toannual ~~Level~~or 3interim ~~fair~~period ~~value~~have ~~measurements~~not ~~are~~yet ~~effective~~been ~~for us in 2011~~issued. The ~~Update~~adoption ~~requires~~of ~~new~~this standard ~~disclosures~~is ~~only,~~not ~~and~~anticipated ~~has~~to nohave a material impact on our ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~position, results of operations, or cash flow~~statements.

The Company does not believe that other recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a material impact on its financial statements.

NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and Equipment consist of the following at October 31, 2010 ~~and 2009~~:

	2010			2009
Furniture and fixtures	$	2,107
Office equipment	$	—		$	67,982
Accumulated Depreciation		(2,107	)
Furniture and fixtures		2,107			2,107
	$	—
Leasehold improvements		—			2,900
		2,107			72,989
Accumulated Depreciation		(2,107	)		(54,834	)
Total	$	—		$	18,155

Depreciation expense was $52,~~477~~107 ~~and $10,592~~ for the ~~years~~year ended October 31, 2010 ~~and 2009~~, which relates to the discontinued operations.

F13

NOTE 4 - INVESTMENTS

As of October 31, 2010, investments consist of $500,000 of Preferred Series A Stock of ProTek Capital, Inc. (“ProTek”) and 4.95% of the intellectual property held by Propalms Ltd. also valued at $500,000, which were recorded at cost.

On September 2, 2010, the Company purchased Propalms International Ltd., a Nevada corporation, which was formed on August 24, 2010, (“Propalms International”) pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, dated August 31, 2010 (“Stock Purchase Agreement”), for ~~250~~2,~~000~~500,000 restricted common shares. Propalms International had no revenues and no liabilities and its asset consisted solely of an intangible asset, a worldwide marketing and sales agreement between Propalms Ltd, a UK corporation and Propalms International as of September 2, 2010. The Company and Propalms International agreed to a purchase price of $2.5 million, which is allocated entirely to Propalms International’s intangible asset.

~~F12~~In completion of the closing of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company increased its authorized common stock to 950,000,000 shares from 150,000,000 shares after approval by a stockholder with a majority voting interest (50.1%) and issued 2,500,000 common shares as required.

On October 29, 2010, the Company terminated the Stock Purchase Agreement by mutual consent of all parties and returned the parties to their original condition, except for the distribution of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that was delivered to ProTek and will not be returned. In exchange for those shares, the Company received 500,000 shares of Preferred Series A Stock of ProTek at $1.00 per share for 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and 4.95% of the intellectual property of Propalms Ltd. for 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock also valued at $500,000. The investments were valued at the fair value of the common shares issued based on the trading price of the shares.

In February 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company agreed to rescind the investment agreement with ProTek. Pursuant to the rescission, ProTek returned the 500,000 common shares to the Company and the Company returned the 500,000 shares of Preferred Series A Stock to ProTek.

At October 31, 2011, the Company determined that the investment in the Propalms Ltd. Intellectual property was impaired and the $500,000 invested was written off.

NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE - OTHER

The Company received the proceeds of two notes totaling $102,500 during the year ended October 31, 2009. In April 2010, one of the notes with a value of $22,500 was satisfied through the issuance of 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The remaining $80,000 note has no stated terms and is due on demand. The note is convertible into the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price pursuant to the terms of the note.

Proceeds from three additional notes totaling $105,000 were received during the year ended October 31, 2010. The notes are convertible into shares of common stock at a variable conversion price as defined in the agreements. A $50,000 note bore interest at 8% per annum and matured on October 25, 2010. During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Company converted $15,500 of the $50,000 Note into 43,056 shares of the Company’s common stock. A $40,000 note bore interest at 8% per annum and matured on December 22, 2010, and a $15,000 note bore interest at 9% per annum and matured on March 1, 2011.

The Company received a note from the write down of debt and the issuance of a new note on January 21, 2011 in the amount of $400,000 in settlement of the complete prior debt that was then due to a related party Charter Management LLC (see Note 6).

F14

NXDuring ~~GLOBAL~~the year ended October 31, ~~INC~~2011, the Company received proceeds of $374,641 from various convertible debentures and issued $151,700 in convertible debentures for direct payment of the Company’s expenses and other non cash items. The notes bear interest ranging from 5% to 12% per annum with payment terms ranging from on demand to two years. Substantially all of the notes are convertible into the Company’s common stock at variable conversion prices pursuant to the terms of the notes.

~~NOTES~~During TOthe ~~CONSOLIDATED~~year ~~FINANCIAL~~ended ~~STATEMENTS~~October 31, ~~(CONTINUED)~~2011, the holders converted a total of $354,250 of various existing notes and $5,910 of interest into 13,194,186 common shares. As of October 31, 2011, the $769,591 outstanding principal was convertible into 134,753,619 common shares.

~~OCTOBER~~Interest expense (including the amortization of the debt discount) was $454,494 and $411,789 for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010. ~~AND~~Notes ~~2009~~payable – other consist of the following at:

In completion of the closing of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company increased its authorized common stock to 950,000,000 shares from 150,000,000 shares after approval by a stockholder with a majority voting interest (50.1%) and issued 250,000,000 common shares as required.


	October 31, 2011			October 31, 2010

Cost	$	1,123,841		$	213,000
Less: Repayment		(354,250	)		(15,500	)

		769,591			197,500
Less: Debt discount		(377,166	)		(133,000	)
Add: Amortization of debt discount		288,271			114,783


Total	$	680,696		$	179,283

On October 29, 2010, the Company terminated the Stock Purchase Agreement by mutual consent of all parties and returned the parties to their original condition, except for the distribution of 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that was delivered to ProTek and will not be returned. In exchange for those shares, the Company received 500,000 shares of Preferred Series A Stock of ProTek at $1.00 per share for 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and 4.95% of the intellectual property of Propalms Ltd. for 50,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock also valued at $500,000.


	October 31, 2011			October 31, 2010

Demand note, interest at 10%, conversion at 50% of closing price with $.001 floor	$	325,000		$	—
Demand note, interest at 10%, conversion at 50% of closing price		80,000			80,000
Note payable due October 2010, interest at 8%, conversion at 58% of closing price		—			34,500
Note payable due December 2010, interest at 8%, conversion at 58% of closing price		—			40,000
Demand note, interest at 8%, conversion at 55% of closing price		11,500			—
Demand note, interest at 5%, conversion at 50% of closing price		—			28,000
Demand note, interest at 9%, conversion at lower of $.01 or 50% of closing price		21,050			15,000
Demand note, interest at 8%, conversion at 85% of closing price		28,975			—
Demand note, interest at 8%, conversion at closing price with $.001 floor		38,000			—
Demand note, interest at 8%, conversion at closing price with $.001 floor		25,000			—
Note payable, due February 2012, interest at 6%, conversion at 50% of close		25,000			—
Note payable, interest at 8%, due February 2012, conversion at 85% of closing price		28,750			—
Demand note, interest at 8%, conversion at closing price with $.001 floor		60,400			—
Note payable, interest at 12%, due December 2012, conversion at 50% of closing price		16,666			—
Note payable, interest at 13%, due March 2012, conversion at 50% of closing price		25,000			—
Demand note, interest at 8%, conversion at closing price with $.001 floor		18,000			—
Notes payable, interest at 6%, due June 2012, conversion at 50% of closing price		66,250			—

		769,591			197,500
Less: Debt discount		(377,166	)		(133,000	)
Add: Amortization of debt discount		288,271			114,783


Total	$	680,696		$	179,283

~~In February 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company agreed to rescind the investment agreement with ProTek. Pursuant to~~F15 ~~the rescission, ProTek returned the 50,000,000 common shares to the Company and the Company returned the 500,000 shares of Preferred Series A Stock to ProTek.~~

NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE-OTHER

The Company received the proceeds of two notes totaling $102,500 during the year ended October 31, 2009. In April 2010, one of the notes with a value of $22,500 was satisfied through the issuance of 1.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The remaining note has no stated terms and is due on demand.

Proceeds from three additional notes totaling $105,000 have been received during the year ended October 31, 2010. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and are convertible into shares of common stock at a variable conversion price as defined in the agreements. The $50,000 note bore interest at 8% per annum and matured on October 25, 2010 (the “$50,000 Note”), the $40,000 note bore interest at 8% per annum and matured on December 22, 2010 (the “$40,000 Note”) and the $15,000 note bore interest at 9% per annum and matured on March 1, 2011 (the “$15,000 Note”). Pursuant to the agreements, both the $50,000 Note and $40,000 Note bear interest at 22% per annum if not satisfied at maturity.

During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Company converted $15,500 of the $50,000 Note into 4,305,555 shares of the Company’s common stock and during November 2010 and December 2010, the Company converted the remaining $34,500 principal of the $50,000 Note and related accrued interest of $2,000 into 24,365,080 shares of the Company’s common stock. During December 2010 and January 2011, the Company converted the principal of the $40,000 Note and related accrued interest of $1,600 into 35,787,878 shares of the Company’s common stock.

During the year ended October 31, 2010, the Company issued a $28,000, non-interest bearing note to settle accrued consulting fees (the “$28,000 Note”). The $28,000 Note matured on November 5, 2010 and is currently in default. As of maturity, the $28,000 Note bears interest at 5% per annum. On January 24, 2011, the Company converted $12,500 of the $28,000 Note into 12,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

F13

NX GLOBAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

Interest expense was $13,711 and $ 0 for the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009. Notes payable – other consist of the following at:

	October 31,2010			October 31,2009
Cost	$	213,000		$	102,500
Less: Repayment		(15,500	)		—
Less: Debt discount		(133,000	)		—
Add: Amortization of debt discount		114,783			—
Total	$	179,283		$	102,500

Debt discount is amortized over the terms of the notes payable.

NOTE 6 - NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES

Charter Management, LLC (“Charter”) previously funded the operations of the Company with a credit facility. The balance payable to Charter before the reduction described below was $1,347,318. With the execution of ~~the~~an Agreement entered into on January 21, 2010, the debt was extinguished after two principal payments totaling $57,000 and the issuance of a new convertible promissory note to the former CEO of the Company and owner of Charter, for $400,000. As a result of the extinguishment, the debt was reduced by $890,318, which was reflected as a reduction on the consolidated balance sheet to additional paid-in capital since it was a debt reduction from a related party. Charter was related to the Company through common ownership, but as of May 5, ~~2010~~2011, these parties are no longer affiliates of the Company due to the Agreement and the unpaid balance of the note is included in the table in Note 5.

The convertible promissory note is non-interest bearing until maturity and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price as defined in the agreement. The note matured on January 21, 2011 and is currently in default. Pursuant to ~~agreement~~the Agreement, the note bears interest at 10% per annum if not satisfied at maturity. Notes payable – related parties consist of the following at: October 31, 2010.

	October 312010			October 31,2009
Cost	$	400,000
Cost	$	400,000		$	1,339,558
Less: Debt discount		(400,000	)
Less: Debt discount		(400,000	)		—
Add: Amortization of debt discount		276,692
Add: Amortization of debt discount		276,692			—
Total	$	276,692
Total	$	276,692		$	1,339,558

Debt discount is amortized over the term of the note payable.

NOTE 7 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

The Company completed private placements of convertible notes as described in notes 5 and 6. In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and FASB ASC 815-40 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled In a Company’s Own Stock,” ~~the~~it ~~conversion~~was ~~features~~determined that ~~associated with~~ the ~~convertible~~embedded ~~promissory~~conversion ~~notes~~options –should ~~other~~be ~~(see~~separated ~~Note 5)~~ and ~~convertible~~accounted ~~promissory~~for ~~note~~as –derivative ~~related~~instrument ~~party (see Note 6) represent derivatives~~liabilities. ~~As such~~Accordingly, ~~the~~they ~~Company~~are ~~has~~marked ~~recognized~~to ~~the~~market ~~amount~~each ofreporting $1period,~~101,171~~ aswith ~~derivative~~the ~~liabilities~~corresponding atnon-cash ~~the~~gain ~~time~~or ofloss ~~issuance~~reflected ofin the Company’s ~~debt~~current ~~instruments,~~period ~~which~~statement ~~are measured at their aggregate estimated fair value~~ of ~~$717,043, based on Level 2 inputs, at October 31, 2010~~operations.

~~F14~~The fair market value of the derivative instrument liabilities at October 31, 2011, was estimated to be $632,749, based on the following assumptions: which are Level 3 inputs (1) risk free interest rates of 0.01% to 0.15%, (2) remaining contractual lives of 0.70 to 1.27 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 271% to 521%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. The fair value of our common stock at October 31, 2011 was $.01 and the conversion prices at that date ranged from $.005 to $.0085.

F16

NXBased ~~GLOBAL~~upon the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities from the prior period end, or ~~INC~~their inception date if later, the Company recorded a net non-cash gain on derivative instruments for the years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, of $319,935 and $184,207, respectively.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


	Derivative Liability as of October 31, 2011		Derivative Liability as of October 31, 2011
Convertible Debentures:
Embedded Conversion Option	$	632,749	$	717,043

Total	$	632,749	$	717,043

~~OCTOBER~~The ~~31,~~entire ~~2010~~amount ~~AND~~of ~~2009~~derivative instrument liabilities are classified as current due to the fact that settlement of the derivative instruments could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

The estimated fair value of the derivative liabilities have been calculated based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions at October 31, 2010:

Fair market value of stock		$0.0076
Exercise price		$0.0033 to $0.0045
Dividend yield		0.00%
Risk free interest rate		0.12% to 0.14%
Expected volatility		52% to 427%
Expected life		0.01 to 0.33 years

NOTE 8 - SETTLEMENT PAYABLE

On August 4, 2009, PPL Spectrum Inc. (“PPL”) filed a complaint which alleged the Company failed to make payments due to PPL, and demanded damages in the amount of $435,745. NESNJ received a judgment in favor of PPL on October 14, 2009.

This judgment is against NESNJ, a New Jersey corporation that was a wholly-owned subsidiary until its sale in March 2010. The settlement liability was assumed by the buyer as part of the sale of the subsidiary and is included in the gain on sale of subsidiary during the year ended October 31, 2010.

NOTE 9 –- INCOME TAXES

The components of the net deferred tax asset are as follows:

For the Years Ended October 31,	2010			2009
	2011			2010
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	12,~~907~~267,000		$	1,~~673~~907,000
Impairment of intangibles		323,000			—323,000
Total Deferred Tax Assets		2,~~230~~590,000			12,~~673~~230,000
Valuation allowance		(2,~~230~~590,000	)		(12,~~673~~230,000	)
Net Deferred Tax Assets	$	—		$	—

The valuation allowance increased approximately $~~557~~360,000, and $81557,000 during the years ended ~~December~~October 31, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010, respectively.

The Company has net operating loss carry forwards totaling approximately $45,~~768~~068,000 at October 31, ~~2010~~2011 that will expire, if unused, in various years beginning 2022 through ~~2030~~2031. The principal differences between the net operating loss for income tax purposes and the net loss for book purposes of $8,129,500 results principally from non-cash expenses and derivatives. There are limits on the Company’s ability to use its current net operating loss carry forwards, potentially increasing its future tax liability. The execution of the Agreement (see Note 1) will limit the amount usable in any year of the Company’s net operating losses due to the change in control of the Company within the meaning of the tax laws.

~~There was no provision for or benefit from income taxes from continuing operations during any period presented. The following is a~~F17 ~~reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate:~~

For the Years Ended October 31,	2010			2009
Federal statutory tax rate		34.0	%		34.0	%
State income taxes, net		6.0			6.0
Permanent items		6.1			(26.3	)
Change in valuation allowance		(46.1	)		(13.7	)
Effective tax rate		0.0	%		0.0	%

F15

NXThere ~~GLOBAL,~~was ~~INC~~no provision for or benefit from income taxes from continuing operations during any period presented. The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate:

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)


*For the Years Ended October 31,*	2011			2010
Federal statutory tax rate		34.0	%		34.0	%
State income taxes, net		6.0			6.0
Permanent and temporary items		(27.0	)		6.1
Change in valuation allowance		(13.0	)		(46.1	)

Effective tax rate		0.0	%		0.0	%

~~OCTOBER~~The Company files tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various states. All federal and state tax filings for the Company as of October 31, 2010 ~~AND~~have ~~2009~~been filed. The Company is subject to U.S. federal and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years after 2006. As of October 31, 2011, the Company does not believe it has any uncertain tax positions. As a result, there are no unrecognized tax benefits as of October 31, 2011. If the Company was to incur any interest and penalties in connection with income tax deficiencies, the Company would classify interest in the “interest expense” category and classify penalties in the “noninterest expense” category within the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company files tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various states. All federal and state tax filings for the Company as of October 31, 2009 have been filed. The Company is subject to U.S. federal and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years after 2006. As of October 31, 2010, the Company does not have any uncertain tax positions. As a result, there are no unrecognized tax benefits as of October 31, 2010. If the Company was to incur any interest and penalties in connection with income tax deficiencies, the Company would classify interest in the “interest expense” category and classify penalties in the “noninterest expense” category within the consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 10 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

~~During~~Preferred ~~the~~Stock ~~year ended October 31, 2010, the following transactions occurred:~~

OnThe ~~March 12, 2010, the~~ Company ~~issued~~has 5authorized 500,000~~,000~~ shares of ~~common~~Preferred ~~stock~~Series A Stock, ~~with~~par avalue ~~fair~~$.001. ~~market~~No ~~value~~shares are outstanding. This preference provides that each outstanding share is convertible into 58 shares of ~~$175,000~~the Company’s tocommon anstock ~~investor~~and ~~relations~~votes ~~company~~on ~~for~~an ~~consulting~~as ~~services~~if converted basis.

OnThe ~~March 18, 2010, the~~ Company ~~issued~~has 7authorized 10,~~900,~~000 shares of ~~common~~Series ~~stock~~B Preferred Stock, par value $.001 with a ~~fair~~stated ~~market~~ value of $~~118,500~~40 per share. This preferred stock votes as though it holds 50.1% of the voting stock of the Company as long as one share is outstanding. The preferred shares may be converted by dividing $40 by the average closing bid price for ~~consulting~~the ~~services~~prior 10 trading days to the conversion request times the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock being converted. The Series B Preferred Stock shall rank senior to all other classes of Preferred Stock as to dividends, distributions or as to distributions of assets upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company.

On ~~April~~October 628, ~~2010~~2011, the Company ~~issued~~increased 2its authorized common shares from 950,~~500~~000,000 ~~shares~~to of1,900,000,000. ~~common~~In ~~stock~~addition, ~~with~~on October 28, a2011 ~~fair~~the ~~market~~Company ~~value~~affected ofa ~~$50,000~~1 for ~~consulting services~~100 reverse stock split. All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect this reverse stock split.

OnDuring ~~April 15, 2010,~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~issued~~ended 6October 31,~~000~~ 2011,~~000~~ ~~shares of common stock for~~ the ~~purchase~~following oftransactions ~~Nube,~~occurred: ~~formerly known as GGR with a fair market value of $180,000.~~

OnDuring ~~April~~the year ended October 2631, ~~2010~~2011, the Company issued 3252,~~500,~~000 shares of common stock ~~with a~~for ~~fair~~services. ~~market~~The ~~value~~shares ofwere ~~$42,500~~valued ofon ~~which~~the ~~$22,500~~date ~~(1,500,000~~the ~~shares)~~issuance was ~~for~~agreed ~~debt~~upon ~~conversion~~at ~~and~~ the ~~remaining~~fair value of $2048,~~000~~500 based ~~(2,000,000~~on ~~shares)~~the ~~for~~trading ~~consulting~~price ~~services~~of the Company’s common stock.

OnDuring ~~August~~the year ended October 3031, ~~2010~~2011, the Company issued 13,194,186 3shares of common stock for the conversion of $360,~~500~~160 of convertible debt and interest ($354,~~000~~250 of convertible debt and $5,910 of interest). In addition, the Company issued 137,851 shares of common stock ~~with~~for acommitment ~~fair~~fees ~~market~~on debt valued on the date the issuance was agreed upon at the fair value of $35147,~~000~~500 based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock and 571,735 shares of common stock held by debt holders for ~~consulting~~future ~~services.~~conversions of convertible debt.

OnDuring ~~September~~the year ending October 831, 2010, the ~~Company~~following ~~issued~~transactions ~~10,800,000~~occurred: ~~shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair market value of $150,120.~~

On ~~September~~January 89, 2010, the Company issued 142,~~500,000~~525 shares, ofwith ~~common~~a ~~stock~~fair ~~for~~market ~~cash~~value ~~proceeds~~ of $330,~~333.~~511, to an investor relation agent for services performed.

~~On September 3, 2010, the Company increased its authorized common stock to 950,000,000 shares from 150,000,000 shares~~F18 after approval by a stockholder with a majority voting interest (50.1%) and on September 8, 2010, the Company issued 250,000,000 shares of common stock for an acquisition of a subsidiary. On October 30, 2010, the acquisition was rescinded and 150,000,000 of these shares were returned and the remainder used for the purchase of a 4.95% investment in intellectual property and 500,000 of ProTek Series A, preferred shares at $1.00 per share for an aggregate fair value of $1,000,000 (see Note 4).

In October 2010, the Company issued 4,305,555 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $15,500 for debt conversion (see Note 5).

On October 27, 2010, the Company issued 1,136,000 shares for the payment of interest with a fair market value of 7,952 (see Note 5).

On October 27, 2010, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $56,000, of which $14,000 was for consulting services and $42,000 was for director compensation.

F16

NXOn ~~GLOBAL~~February 18, ~~INC~~2010, the Company issued 1,000 shares, with a fair market value of $5,000, for services.

~~NOTES~~On TOMarch 11, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~2010, ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~Company ~~(CONTINUED)~~issued 3,500 shares for $17,500 in cash in four separate subscription agreements.

~~OCTOBER~~On 31July 29, 2010, ~~AND~~the ~~2009~~Company issued 15,000 shares for $10,000 in cash in a subscription agreement.

During the year ending October 31, 2009, the following transactions occurred:

On January 9, 2009 the Company issued 425,245 shares, with a fair market value of $30,511, to an investor relation agent for services performed.

On February 18, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares, with a fair market value of $5,000, for services.

On March 11, 2009, the Company issued 350,000 shares for $17,500 in cash in four separate subscription agreements.

On July 29, 2009, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares for $10,000 in cash in a subscription agreement.

Warrants:

As of October 31, ~~2010,~~2011 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2010, the Company has 1,000,000 million warrants outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $0.96. The remaining contractual life of the warrants was ~~1.7~~ 0.6 years at October 31, ~~2010~~2011.

Stock Compensation Plans:

On January 11, 2011, Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2011 Consultant Stock Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”). Under the terms of the 2011 Plan, the Company reserved 20,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued during the 2011 Plan’s one-year term. Professionals and consultants who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan.

On March 30, ~~2010~~2011, Company’s Board of Directors approved the ~~2010~~2011 Professional/Consultant Stock Compensation Plan (the “~~2010~~2011 Plan”). Under the terms of the ~~2010~~2011 Plan, the Company reserved 10100,000~~,000~~ shares of common stock to be issued during the ~~2010~~2011 Plan’s one-year term. Professionals and consultants who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate in the ~~2010~~2011 Plan. At October 31, ~~2010~~2011 all shares were issued under the ~~2010~~2011 Plan.

The Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan in 2007 (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the Board to issue up to 1,500,000 common shares during the ten year period of the 2007 Plan. The shares may be awarded to employees or directors of the Company as well as to consultants to those entities. ~~The shares may be awarded as outright grants or in the form of options, restricted stock or performance shares.~~ At October 31, ~~2010~~2011, 1,158,703 shares remain available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.

NOTE 11 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In January 2010, the Company discontinued sales of its ozone laundry equipment business and all warranty, supply and repair services associated with it (“Ozone division”) and in March 2010 the Company sold its New Jersey subsidiary and realized a gain of $683,804. The New Jersey subsidiary was sold for cash proceeds of $10 and the assumption of all the Company’s liabilities net of property and equipment. The Company has classified these operations as discontinued operations for ~~the current and prior periods reported~~2010.

~~F17~~On September 30, 2011, the Company closed its operations of Nube, Inc. which provided training related to installing and using cloud computing. The discontinuance of Nube’s operations has been reclassified in the October 31, 2010 financial statements.

NX GLOBAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

The discontinuance had the following effects:

	October 31,2010			October 31,2009
	October 31,2011			October 31,2010
Assets
Current assets from discontinued operations:
Accounts receivable	$	—		$	71,954
Noncurrent assets from discontinued operations:
Property and equipment, net		—			18,155
Total assets of discontinued operations	$	—		$	90,109
Liabilities
Current liabilities of discontinued operations:
Settlement payable	$	—		$	437,020
Accounts payable and other current liabilities	$	—		$	28,681
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		28,681			319,292
	$	—		$	28,681
	$	28,681		$	756,312
Net liabilities of discontinued operations	$	—		$	(28,681	)
Net liabilities of discontinued operations	$	(28,681	)	$	(666,203	)

	Years EndedOctober 31,
	2010		2009
Revenues	$	236,719	$	744,867
Cost and expenses		164,522		768,900
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	72,197	$	(24,033	)

F19

NOTE 12 - CONCENTRATION

One debtor, Technology Business Group, represented 100% of the total outstanding accounts receivable as of October 31, 2010. Two customers, Technology Business Group and VM Trainers represented 81% and 19%, respectively, of the training revenue during the year ended October 31, 2010. The Company had three customers that provided 100% of its revenue.

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Consulting Contracts

The Company has entered into consulting contracts for various services ranging from professional services to merger and acquisition services. All of the contracts expire in February 2012. As a result of the Company entering into a certain Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 31, 2010 (see Note 4), all three consulting contracts were terminated. The three contracts were reinstated immediately following the rescission of the Stock Purchase Agreement in October 2010. At October 31, 2010, the future minimum payments required under these consulting contracts are $408,000 and $136,000 for the years ending October 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Litigation

On December 17, 2009, Nutek International, Inc. filed for an injunction to enjoin an employee of NESNJ, a New Jersey corporation from continuing to provide services. The Company believes that the suit has no merit as the employee resigned from the Company on December 22, 2009.

The above litigation was the responsibility of NESNJ, which was assumed by the buyer as part of the sale of the subsidiary in March 2010 (see Notes 1 and 11).

F18

NX GLOBAL, INC.


	Years Ended October 31,
	2011			2010
Revenues	$	150,577		$	329,527

Cost and expenses		157,751			250,158


Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(7,174	)	$	79,369

~~NOTES~~NOTE TO12 ~~CONSOLIDATED~~- ~~FINANCIAL~~COMMITMENTS ~~STATEMENTS~~AND ~~(CONTINUED)~~CONTINGENCIES

~~OCTOBER~~Consulting ~~31,~~Contracts ~~2010 AND 2009~~

The Company ishas aentered ~~party~~into consulting contracts for various services ranging from ~~time~~professional services to ~~time~~merger toand ~~various~~acquisition ~~other~~services. ~~legal~~All ~~actions~~of ~~that~~the ~~arise~~contracts expire in February 2012. As a result of the ~~normal~~Company ~~course~~entering ofinto ~~business.~~a Incertain ~~the~~Stock ~~opinion~~Purchase ofAgreement, ~~management~~dated August 31, 2011 (see Note 4), all three consulting contracts were terminated. The three contracts were reinstated immediately following the ~~resolution~~rescission of ~~these~~the ~~other~~Stock ~~matters~~Purchase Agreement ~~will~~in ~~not~~October ~~have~~2010. aAt ~~material~~October 31, ~~and~~2011, ~~adverse~~the ~~effect~~future onminimum ~~the~~payments ~~Company’s~~required ~~consolidated~~under ~~financial~~these ~~position~~consulting contracts are $136,000 ~~results~~for ofthe ~~operations~~year orending ~~cash~~October 31, ~~flows~~2012.

Line of Credit

In April 2010, the Company secured a $10,000,000 line of credit (the “Line of Credit”) to facilitate its business model. The Company ~~will~~would behave been able to draw down on the line of credit after a form S-1 Registration Statement is filed and ~~becomes~~became effective. The S-1 was subsequently abandoned and the line commitment terminated.

~~NOTE~~Joint 14Venture -Agreement ~~SUBSEQUENT EVENTS~~

~~Joint~~In ~~Ventures~~October 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Eastern Energy Emissions Solutions, Inc. to exploit a sub license for marketing sale and installation of Truck Emissions Control Technologies, Inc. technologies. The first product to be marketed in the Northeastern United States is the diesel emissions control system for diesel trucks that provides reduction of polluting gases and particulate matter. The agreement is contingent on funding which the company is to provide and has not yet been secured. The Company owns 50.1% of the venture and will receive a distribution of 30% of the net profit.

InNOTE ~~November,~~13 the Company’s subsidiary ACEC signed two joint venture agreements to further its business operations in algae production and the conversion of waste to energy. The agreements include terms for funding, the licensing of patented and non-~~patented~~ ~~production~~SUBSEQUENT and manufacturing and growing technologies, site management and project development, site procurement plus other related items. The joint ventures will not begin operations until funding is in place for their furtherance. EVENTS

In January 2011, the Company has received a letter committing the first $100,000,000 of financing for the proposed site near Portage Du Fort, Quebec, Canada. Negotiations are ongoing with the governmental agencies necessary to acquire permits and guarantees required to begin construction and operations. The site has recently been designated by the Pontiac MRC Quebec (“MRC”) as the region’s Environmental Industrial Park and the municipal waste collected throughout the region under the MRC must be delivered to the site for eco friendly disposal. This project is under review as a consortium of the MRC and the City of Gatineau, Quebec issued a qualifications request from the general business population within days of ACEC having signed a letter of intent to lease the property for this project in January 2011. The request for qualification requires several businesses from Quebec to be involved and significantly impairs the ability of ACEC or its joint venture partners from controlling its own destiny or operating the facility as it would like to maximize its potential economic impact.

Note Issuances

In ~~November~~December ~~2010~~2011, the Company issued ana $825,000, ~~non-~~convertible promissory note that bears interest ~~bearing~~at 8% per annum and matures on ~~demand~~December 2, ~~promissory~~2012 ~~note~~(the “$25,000 Note”). The $25,000 Note may be converted into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of 50% of the market value of the common stock.

In December 2010, the Company issued a $32,500 convertible promissory note that bears interest at 8% per annum and matures on September 6, 2011 (the “$32,500 Note”). The $32,500 Note may be converted into the Company’s common stock after 180 days at a conversion price of 55% of the market value of the common stock.

In January 2011, the Company issued a $28,975 convertible promissory note that bears interest at 8% per annum and matures on January 13, 2012 (the “$28,975 Note”). The $28,975 Note may be converted into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of 85% of the market value of the common stock.

In February 2011, the Company issued a $25,000 convertible redeemable note that bears interest at 6% interest per annum and matures on February 1, 2013 (the “$25,000 Note”). The $25,000 Note may be converted into the Company’s common stock at 50% of the lowest bid price for four days, including the day of conversion and prior three days.

Stock Issuances

OnIn November ~~23,~~ ~~2010~~2011, the Company ~~issued~~authorized 27,~~150~~232,~~000~~137 common shares with a fair market value of $2320,~~005~~550 ~~to pay~~ for ~~prepaid~~debt ~~fees per an agreement with an investor~~conversion. ~~These fees are directly related to the utilization of the Line of Credit (see Note 13). The investor may hold up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of the Company.~~

On In November ~~23,~~ ~~2010~~2011, the Company ~~issued~~authorized 1,~~500~~700,000 common shares with a fair market value of $1017,~~500~~000 for consulting services.

OnIn November ~~29,~~ ~~2010~~2011, the Company ~~issued~~authorized 91,~~500~~524,000 ~~common shares with a fair market value of $101,650~~ for ~~prepaid~~collateral ~~services per an agreement with an investor. These shares were returned~~ on ~~February 2,~~convertible ~~2011~~debt.

~~F19~~ In December 2011, the Company authorized 4,100,000 for collateral on convertible debt.

NX GLOBAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

On January 26, 2011, the Company issued 11,200,000 common shares with a fair market value of $22,400 for consulting services.

On February 2, 2011, the Company issued 3,561,027 common shares with a fair market value of $38,103 for prepaid consulting services, which are directly related to the utilization of the Line of Credit (see Note 13). The investor may hold up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of the Company.

On February 9, 2011, the Company issued 13,000,000 common shares to convert $12,064 of the principal of a $25,000 note payable and 12,000,000 common shares as collateral for future note conversions on a $30,000 note payable.

On February 18, 2011, the Company issued 12,500,000 common shares to convert $12,500, of the principal of a $25,000 note payable.

F20

In December 2011, the Company authorized 16,250,635 common shares with a fair market value of $12,085 for debt conversion.

In January 2012, the Company authorized 7,100,000 common shares for consulting services with a fair market value of $4,970.

In January 2012, the Company authorized 100,000,000 common shares with a fair market value of $72,000 for the conversion of 1,800 Series B Preferred shares.

In January 2012, the Company authorized 2,700,000 common shares for collateral on convertible debt.

In January, 2012, the Company authorized 58,904,864 common shares with a fair market value of $13,732.50.

In January 2012, the Company authorized 25,000,000 common shares with a fair market value of $10,000.

In February 2012, the Company authorized 23,520,613 common shares with a fair market value $5,600 for debt conversion. These shares have been authorized but are unissued.

F21

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NX Global Company, Inc. By: /s/ ~~David~~Patrick FA. ~~LaFave~~McGough ~~David~~Patrick FA. ~~LaFave~~McGough, Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below on ~~March~~February 1120, ~~2011~~2012 by the following persons, on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ ~~David~~Patrick FA. ~~LaFave~~McGough ~~David~~Patrick F.A, ~~LaFave~~McGough, Director, Chief Executive Officer, /s/ ~~David~~Patrick F.A ~~LaFave~~McGough ~~David~~Patrick F.A ~~LaFave~~McGough, Director, Chief Financial Officer,

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · NX Global, Inc