UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-10795

BOEING CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware				95-2564584
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)				(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


500 Naches Ave. SW, 3rd Floor • Renton, Washington		98057
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(425) 965-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	¨			Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer	x	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company	)	Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Common stock shares outstanding at ~~April~~July 25, 2012: 50,000 shares, all of which were owned by The Boeing Company.

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.

Table of Contents

			Page
Part I. Financial Information (Unaudited)
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	1	1
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1	1
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	2	2
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity	3	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4	4
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5	5
		Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	15	16
	Forward-Looking Statements		16	17
	Item 2.	Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations	17	18
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20	21
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	20	22
Part II. Other Information
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	22	23
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	22	23
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	22	23
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	22	23
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	22	23
	Item 5.	Other Information	22	23
	Item 6.	Exhibits	24	25
	Signatures		25	26

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions, except par value)	~~March~~June 3130,2012			December 31,2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~399~~386		$	941
Short-term investments		100			300
Receivables:
Finance leases		1,~~677~~636			1,727
Notes and other		~~577~~588			621
		2,254			2,348
		2,224			2,348
Allowance for losses on receivables		(5049	)		(53	)
		2,204			2,295
		2,175			2,295
Equipment under operating leases, net		1,~~400~~475			1,439
Investments		108			7
Assets held for sale or re-lease, net		~~510~~418			521
Other assets		5749			63
	$	4,~~680~~611		$	5,566
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	4145		$	65
Other liabilities		~~220~~202			256
Accounts with Boeing		62103			76
Deferred income taxes		1,~~219~~165			1,232
Debt		2,~~622~~577			3,400
		4,164			5,029
		4,092			5,029
Shareholder’s equity:
Common shares – $100 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding 50,000 shares		5			5
Additional paid-in capital		~~510~~511			523
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		1			1
Retained earnings		–2			8
		516			537
		519			537
	$	4,~~680~~611		$	5,566

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2012			2011			2012			2011
REVENUE
Finance lease income	$	2120		$	3534		$	41		$	69
Interest income on notes receivable		11			8			22			16
Operating lease income		6966			9091			135			181
Net gain on disposal of assets		–2			510			2			15
Other income		24–			54			24			9
		125			143
		99			147			224			290
EXPENSES
Interest expense		2820			3329			48			62
Depreciation expense		3437			4241			71			83
Recovery of losses		(31	)		(63	)		(4	)		(9	)
Operating expenses		1314			1112			27			23
Asset impairment expense		14–			95			14			14
Other expense		1–			21			1			3
		87			91
		70			85			157			176
Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax		3829			5262			67			114
Provision for income tax		1410			1922			24			41
Income from continuing operations		2419			3340			43			73
Net loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax		–			(21	)		–			(3	)
Net income		2419			3139			43			70
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX
Other comprehensive income		–			–			–			–
Comprehensive income	$	2419		$	3139		$	43		$	70

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)	Total			CommonShares		AdditionalPaid-InCapital			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)		RetainedEarnings
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	687		$	5	$	682		$	–	$	–
Cash dividends to Boeing (including return of capital)		(~~191~~228	)		–		(160	)		–		(3168	)
Net income		3170			–		–			–		3170
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	527		$	5	$	522		$	–	$	–
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	529		$	5	$	522		$	–	$	2
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	537		$	5	$	523		$	1	$	8
Cash dividends to Boeing (including return of capital)		(45	)		–		(13	)		–		(32	)
Non-cash capital contributions from Boeing		1					1
Net income		24			–		–			–		24
Cash dividends to Boeing (including return of capital)		(62	)				(13	)		–		(49	)
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	516		$	5	$	510		$	1	$	–
Net income		43			–		–			–		43
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	519		$	5	$	511		$	1	$	2

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2012			2011
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	2443		$	3170
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Non-cash items:
Depreciation and amortization expense		3370			3979
Net gain on disposal of assets		–(2	)		(515	)
Recovery of losses		(34	)		(69	)
Asset impairment expense and other charges		1516			914
Net loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax		–			2
Share-based plans expense		1			–
Decrease in deferred income taxes		(13	)		(17	)
Net loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax		–			3
Decrease in deferred income taxes		(67	)		(25	)
Other charges and credits, net		(2	)		–
Change in assets and liabilities:
Other assets		–2			316
Accrued interest and rents		–(1	)		12
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2420	)		(3823	)
Other liabilities		(3554	)		(1130	)
Accounts with Boeing		~~(15~~26	)		174
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(18	)		25
Net cash provided by operating activities		8			86
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of investments		(3	)		–
Purchase of short-term investments		(~~100~~200	)		(~~300~~500	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		~~300~~400			~~900~~1,000
Proceeds from available-for-sale investments		–1			12
Payment for capitalizable costs in process		(313	)		–
Proceeds from disposition of equipment		911			2453
Payments of leases, notes and other receivables		92161			82155
Net cash provided by investing activities		295			707
Origination of leases, notes and other receivables		(39	)		–
Net cash provided by investing activities		318			710
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayment of debt		(~~774~~819	)		(~~786~~790	)
Payment of dividends (including return of capital)		(4562	)		(~~191~~228	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~819~~881	)		(~~977~~1,018	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(~~542~~555	)		(~~245~~222	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		941			425
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~399~~386		$	~~180~~203
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net transfer to (from) assets held for sale or re-lease	$	10		$	(13	)
Net transfer from assets held for sale or re-lease	$	(77	)	$	(9	)
Net transfer to (from) equipment under operating leases	$	(4	)	$	13
Net transfer to notes receivable	$	–		$	193
Transfer from other assets	$	(6	)	$	–
Net transfer to (from) equipment under operating leases	$	102		$	(165	)
Decrease in debt due to fair value hedge derivatives	$	3		$	8
Net transfer from finance leases	$	–		$	(44	)
Transfer from other assets	$	(25	)	$	–
Transfer to allowance for losses on receivables	$	–		$	11
Transfer to accounts with Boeing	$	–		$	2
Transfer to other liabilities	$	–		$	12
Increase in debt due to fair value hedge derivatives	$	–		$	(4	)

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Boeing Capital Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, referred to as “us,” “we,” “our,” “BCC” or the “Company”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Boeing Company (Boeing). We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In our opinion all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation are reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the period ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Immaterial Restatement

Subsequent to the issuance of our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 we determined that it should have reflected Finance lease receivables of $1,727, as compared to the $1,739 reported, and the difference of $12 should have been reflected as a reduction in Finance lease income for the year ended December 31, 2011. In connection with the November 2011 bankruptcy filing by American Airlines, Inc. (American Airlines), certain lease payments by American Airlines beginning in May 2012, the first scheduled payments under the relevant leases since the bankruptcy filing, are required to be allocated exclusively to various non-recourse debt holders, at higher interest rates, until all such holders are paid in full, and only thereafter to us. The reallocation of payments required us to recalculate our investment in leveraged leases for the year ended December 31, 2011. This reallocation of payments does not affect amounts payable under these leases by American Airlines. The reallocation of payments also does not alter our expectation that we will not incur any losses related to American Airlines receivables as a result of the bankruptcy.

Management believes that the effect of this recalculation is not material to our previously issued consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. The impact on specific line items in the December 31, 2011 consolidated balance sheet is presented below:

	As of December 31, 2011
Balance Sheet Items:		As Previously Reported		Restated
Finance leases	$	$1,739	$	$1,727
Total receivables, gross of allowance		2,360		2,348
Total receivables, net of allowance		2,307		2,295
Total assets		5,578		5,566
Accounts with Boeing		77		76
Deferred income taxes		1,236		1,232
Total liabilities		5,034		5,029
Retained earnings		15		8
Shareholder’s equity		544		537
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	$5,578	$	$5,566

Note 2 – Transactions with Boeing

As a wholly owned subsidiary of Boeing, our mission is to arrange for the financing of products manufactured by Boeing. When third party financing is not available, we may provide such financing directly.

We have a number of general contractual arrangements with Boeing to facilitate our operations including, among others, a support agreement, a tax sharing agreement and an agreement allowing us to borrow under Boeing’s committed revolving lines of credit. We also have an intercompany borrowing and lending arrangement with Boeing.

In addition, we may require other forms of support from Boeing with respect to certain financing transactions we undertake. This support may take the form of intercompany guarantees, subsidies, remarketing agreements or other support arrangements.

There can be no assurances that these intercompany agreements and arrangements will not be terminated or modified by us or Boeing. However, our and Boeing’s ability to terminate or modify the support agreement is subject to certain conditions. See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2 of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we were the beneficiary of up to a maximum of $1,~~556~~538 under our guarantees from Boeing which mitigates our risk with respect to portfolio assets totaling $1,~~901~~877.

Intercompany guarantee amounts by aircraft type are summarized as follows:

	March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Guarantee Amount		Carrying Value		Guarantee Amount		Carrying Value
717 (out of production)	$	1,~~464~~445	$	1,~~766~~742	$	1,481	$	1,790
Out of production single-aisle aircraft		5249		5249		55		55
Other, including other Boeing aircraft		4044		8386		41		83
	$	1,~~556~~538	$	1,~~901~~877	$	1,577	$	1,928

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Accounts with Boeing included $3634 and $38 for deferred revenue associated with guarantee and subsidy settlements and terminations.

We recorded the following activity under the intercompany guarantee and subsidy agreements for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130:

	2012			2011
Operating lease income	$	12		$	16
Finance lease income(1)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)
Interest income on notes receivable		1			1
Operating lease income		26			33
Net gain on disposal of assets		–			2
	$	26		$	35

(1) For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2012 and 2011, weFinance ~~recorded~~lease noincome ~~new~~included ~~business~~$(1) ~~volume~~and ~~related~~$(1) tofor ~~Boeing aircraft,~~fees ~~equipment~~paid orto ~~services~~Boeing werelated ~~purchased~~to orguarantee ~~financed~~agreements.

~~Note~~For 3the –six ~~Portfolio~~months ~~Quality~~ ended June 30, 2012, we recorded new business volume of $19 related to Boeing aircraft, equipment or services we purchased or financed. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded no new business volume related to Boeing aircraft, equipment or services we purchased or financed.

Allowance for Losses on Receivables

The following table reconciles the activity in the allowance for losses on receivables for the three months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
Allowance for losses on receivables at beginning of period	$	53		$	87
Recovery of losses		(3	)		(6	)
Allowance for losses on receivables at end of period	$	50		$	81
Allowance as a percentage of total receivables		2.2	%		3.7	%
Allowance for losses on receivables collectively evaluated for impairment	$	50		$	81

Of the $322 of financing receivables individually evaluated for impairment at March 31, 2012, $182 was classified as impaired. We recorded no allowance for losses on these impaired receivables.

Note 3 – Portfolio Quality

Allowance for Losses on Receivables

The following table reconciles the activity in the allowance for losses on receivables for the six months ended June 30:


	2012			2011
Allowance for losses on receivables at beginning of period	$	53		$	87
Recovery of losses		(4	)		(9	)
Write-offs		–			(11	)
Allowance for losses on receivables at end of period	$	49		$	67

Allowance as a percentage of total receivables		2.2	%		3.0	%
Allowance for losses on receivables collectively evaluated for impairment	$	49		$	67

Of the $305 of financing receivables individually evaluated for impairment at June 30, 2012, $182 was classified as impaired. We recorded no allowance for losses on these impaired receivables.

Credit Quality

We assign internal credit ratings for all customers and determine the creditworthiness of each customer based upon ~~public~~publicly ~~information~~available information and information obtained directly from our customers. We utilize these credit ratings as one of the factors in assessing the adequacy of our allowance for losses on receivables. Our rating categories are comparable to those used by the major credit rating agencies.

The following table details our receivable balances by the internal rating category which was used as a factor in determining our allowance for losses on receivables:

	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
Rating categories	Out-of-ProductionAircraft		In- ProductionAircraft/Other		Total		Out-of-ProductionAircraft		In-ProductionAircraft/Other		Total
BBB	$	1,277	$	–	$	1,277	$	1,316	$	–	$	1,316
A	$	–	$	34	$	34	$	–	$	–	$	–
BB		–		60		60		–		67		67
BBB		1,239		–		1,239		1,316		–		1,316
B		61		–		61		103		–		103
BB		–		61		61		–		67		67
CCC		227		307		534		194		318		512
B		58		–		58		103		–		103
D		171		151		322		171		179		350
CCC		221		302		523		194		318		512
Total carrying value	$	1,736	$	518	$	2,254	$	1,784	$	564	$	2,348
D		171		138		309		171		179		350
Total carrying value	$	1,689	$	535	$	2,224	$	1,784	$	564	$	2,348

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, our recorded allowance primarily related to receivables with rating of CCC in the preceding table, and we applied default rates that averaged 47% to exposure associated with those receivables.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, receivables of $~~977~~951 and $1,032 were related to customers we believe have less than investment-grade credit.

Impaired Receivables

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 we had impaired receivables with a carrying value and unpaid principal balance of $182, all of which related to out-of-production aircraft on lease to American Airlines. At December 31, 2011 we had impaired receivables with a carrying value and unpaid principal balance of $182, all of which related to out-of-production aircraft on lease to American Airlines. We recorded no allowance for losses on these impaired receivables.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, American Airlines filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. We believe that our receivables from American Airlines of $~~322~~305 and $350 are sufficiently collateralized such that we have not recorded an allowance for losses as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011 as a result of the bankruptcy. Our receivables from American Airlines include leveraged leases with a carrying value of $127 net of $~~269~~241 non-recourse debt at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

The following table details our average recorded investment and the related income recognized in the period of impairment on the impaired receivables for the three months ended March 31:

2012		AverageCarrying Value				IncomeRecognized
Out-of-production aircraft		$	182			$	–

At March 31, 2011, we had no impaired receivables.

The following table details our average recorded investment and the related income recognized in the period of impairment on the impaired receivables for the six months ended June 30:


2012	Average Carrying Value		Income Recognized
Out-of-production aircraft	$	182	$	–

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had no impaired receivables.

Past Due Receivables

The aging analysis of receivables past due consisted of the following at:

March 31, 2012	31-60 DaysPast Due		61-90 DaysPast Due		Greater than90 Days		Total Past Due> 30 Days		RelatedCarryingValue		CarryingAmount > 90Days andAccruing
June 30, 2012	31-60 DaysPast Due		61-90 DaysPast Due		Greater than90 Days		Total Past Due> 30 Days		RelatedCarryingValue		CarryingAmount > 90Days andAccruing
Out-of-production	$	2	$	–	$	2	$	4	$	54	$	–
Out-of-production aircraft	$	1	$	1	$	5	$	7	$	54	$	–
Total	$	21	$	–1	$	25	$	47	$	54	$	–
December 31, 2011
In-production/other aircraft	$	1	$	–	$	–	$	1	$	46	$	–
Total	$	1	$	–	$	–	$	1	$	46	$	–

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets (assets not earning income on an accrual basis) consisted of the following:

	March 31,2012			December 31,2011
	June 30,2012			December 31,2011
Assets placed on non-accrual status:
Receivables:
Out-of-production aircraft	$	171		$	171
Equipment under operating leases, net(1)		917			14
Assets held for sale or re-lease, net(1)		~~120~~140	(2)		50
	$	~~300~~328		$	235
Percent of total non-performing assets to total portfolio		7.29	%		5.4	%

(1) At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, equipment under operating leases of $57131 and $23 are not included in non-performing assets due to intercompany guarantees provided by Boeing. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, assets held for sale or re-lease of $~~390~~278 and $471 are not included in non-performing assets due to intercompany guarantees provided by Boeing.

(2) At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, non-performing assets held for sale or re-lease of $1215 had either a purchase or lease commitment.

Note 4 – Debt

The carrying value of debt, including the net effect of interest rate swap revaluation adjustments and unamortized deferred debt costs, consisted of the following:

(Interest rates are the contractual rates at March 31, 2012)	March 31,2012		December 31,2011
2.13% - 7.58% fixed rate notes due through 2019	$	2,509	$	3,283
1.70% floating rate note due in 2023		25		25
1.34% - 5.79% non-recourse notes due through 2013		48		49
1.09% capital lease obligation due through 2015		40		43
	$	2,622	$	3,400

At March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, we had interest rate swaps which effectively convert debt of $388 and $388 from fixed rates to floating rates.

~~The~~Note ~~most~~4 ~~restrictive~~– covenants in our debt agreements require us to (a) limit the payment of cash dividends to the extent that our consolidated assets would be less than 115% of our consolidated liabilities (excluding deferred taxes) after dividend payments and (b) restrict the amount of liens on our property to secure indebtedness to 15% or less of consolidated assets, other than liens specifically excluded. At March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with these covenants. Debt

The carrying value of debt, including the net effect of interest rate swap revaluation adjustments and unamortized deferred debt costs, consisted of the following:


(Interest rates are the contractual rates at June 30, 2012)	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
2.13% - 7.58% fixed rate notes due through 2019	$	2,470	$	3,283
1.70% floating rate note due in 2023		25		25
1.34% - 5.40% non-recourse notes due through 2013		44		49
1.09% capital lease obligation due through 2015		38		43
	$	2,577	$	3,400

At June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, we had interest rate swaps which effectively convert debt of $388 and $388 from fixed rates to floating rates.

The most restrictive covenants in our debt agreements require us to (a) limit the payment of cash dividends to the extent that our consolidated assets would be less than 115% of our consolidated liabilities (excluding deferred taxes) after dividend payments and (b) restrict the amount of liens on our property to secure indebtedness to 15% or less of consolidated assets, other than liens specifically excluded. At June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with these covenants.

Note 5 – Derivative Financial Instruments

We primarily use derivative instruments to manage exposures to interest rate risk. We enter into interest rate swap contracts to hedge interest rate risk associated with our debt obligations. These interest rate swap contracts are designated as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges. Our contracts entered into as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 do not require collateral or other security from either party.

The fair values of derivative instruments included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:

March 31, 2012	Other Assets		Other Liabilities
June 30, 2012	Other Assets		Other Liabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments - Interest rate swaps	$	2730	$	–
December 31, 2011
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments - Interest rate swaps	$	29	$	–

The notional amount of our interest rate swaps is disclosed in Note 4 – Debt.

For our fair value hedges that qualify for hedge accounting treatment we use the shortcut method and thus there are no gains or losses recognized due to hedge ineffectiveness. Under shortcut hedge accounting treatment, the change in fair value of the interest rate swap is assumed to perfectly offset the change in fair value of the hedged debt. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2012 and~~ 2011 ~~losses~~a gain from changes in the fair value of $~~(3)~~4 ~~and~~was ~~$(8) were~~ recognized in interest expense with a corresponding offset due to changes in the fair value of the hedged underlying debt, resulting in no impact to interest expense.

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

Various legal proceedings and claims are pending or have been asserted against us. We believe that the final outcome of these proceedings and claims will not have a material effect on our earnings, cash flows and/or financial position.

Bankruptcies

On November 29, 2011, American Airlines filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. American Airlines retains certain rights by operating under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, including the right to reject executory contracts, such as aircraft leases. American Airlines has not rejected any of the leases related to our aircraft. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, American Airlines accounted for $~~322~~305 and $350 of our total assets. We believe that our receivables from American Airlines are sufficiently collateralized such that we do not expect to incur losses related to those receivables as a result of the bankruptcy. Some possible outcomes that may occur as a result of the bankruptcy could cause a significant amount of deferred taxes to be accelerated which may impact our near-term cash requirements. We continue to monitor the American Airlines bankruptcy for potential impacts to our business.

Restructurings and Restructuring Requests

From time to time, certain customers have requested a restructuring of their transactions with us. Since December 31, 2011, we have not reached agreement on any restructuring requests that would have a material effect on our earnings, cash flows and/or financial position.

Commitments

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we and Boeing had unfunded financing commitments of $1920,~~607~~267, primarily related to aircraft on order including options and those proposed in sales campaigns. These commitments are provided to give Boeing customers reasonable assurance of financing in connection with orders of Boeing products in advance of delivery. However, customers typically seek lower cost financing from other sources prior to actual delivery. In addition, we continue to work with third party financiers to provide alternative financing to customers and eliminate the need for our financing. We anticipate that we will not be required to fund a significant portion of our financing commitments as we continue to work with third party financiers to provide alternative financing to customers. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to fund greater amounts than historically required. To the extent we are obligated to provide financing, such financing generally includes participation by engine manufacturers which further reduces our obligation. Therefore, the reported amount of commitments does not necessarily represent a future net cash requirement. However, we expect to ultimately provide funding for those commitments which are exercised, whether they are Boeing’s or our commitments. If there were requirements to fund all Boeing’s and our commitments, the timing in which these commitments may be funded (based on estimated earliest potential funding dates as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012) is as follows:

	Total
April through December 2012	$	1,688
July through December 2012	$	911
2013		1,~~280~~299
2014		2,~~525~~490
2015		3,813
2016		3,~~294~~408
Thereafter		78,~~007~~346
	$	1920,~~607~~267

Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the three levels of fair value hierarchy:

March 31, 2012

Total

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets (Level 1)

Significant OtherObservableInputs (Level 2)

SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)

June 30, 2012

Total

Quoted Prices inActive Markets forIdentical Assets (Level 1)

Significant OtherObservableInputs (Level 2)

SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)

Assets

Money market funds

~~284~~280

–

Available-for-sale investments:

EETC

–

Interest rate swaps

2730

–

2730

–

Total

~~316~~314

~~284~~280

2730


December 31, 2011	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Money market funds	$	218	$	218	$	–	$	–
Available-for-sale investments:
EETC		5		–		–		5
Interest rate swaps		29		–		29		–
Total	$	252	$	218	$	29	$	5

Money market funds. Money market funds are valued using a market approach based on the quoted market prices of identical instruments in an active market.

Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate (EETC). The fair value of our EETC is derived using cash flows discounted at market yield derived from trading prices for comparable debt securities. Unrealized gains (losses) are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI).

Interest rate swaps. The fair values of our interest rate swaps are determined using cash flows discounted at market interest rates in effect at the period close.

The following tables present a reconciliation of Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30:

2012	Fair ~~ValueBeginningof~~Value Beginning of Year		RealizedGainsIncludedin Income		AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome/(Loss)		Settlements			TransfersIn/(Out)		Fair Valueat End ofPeriod
Assets
EETC	$	5	$	–	$	–	$	–(1	)	$	–	$	54
Total	$	5	$	–	$	–	$	–(1	)	$	–	$	54
2011
Assets
EETC	$	5	$	–	$	–	$	–(1	)	$	–	$	54
Total	$	5	$	–	$	–	$	–(1	)	$	–	$	54

We value the EETC on a recurring basis using a valuation technique of contractual cash flows discounted using the bond yield of a debt security with similar coupon and maturity, which is considered an unobservable input. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 the yield of 2.9997% was used, having an inverse relationship to the fair value of the EETC.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The table below presents the non-recurring losses recognized for the three months ended March 31, and the fair value and asset classification of the related assets as of the impairment date:

	2012			2011
		FairValue	TotalLosses		FairValue	TotalLosses
Assets
Equipment under operating leases		$12	$(2)		$43	$(5)
Assets held for sale or re-lease		13	(12)		8	(4)
Total		$25	$(14)		$51	$(9)

When an asset is determined to be impaired, the amount of the asset impairment expense recorded is the excess of the carrying value less the fair value of the asset reduced by the consideration of asset value guarantees we hold, if applicable. The fair value of the impaired asset is derived by calculating a median collateral value from a consistent group of third party aircraft value publications. The values provided by the third party aircraft value publications are derived from their knowledge of market trades or other market factors taking into account estimated revenues and costs to operate the aircraft. Management reviews the publications quarterly to assess their continued appropriateness and consistency with market trends. The responsibility of these reviews resides principally within our risk management group. Under certain circumstances, we adjust values based on the attributes and condition of the specific aircraft or equipment, usually when the features or use of the aircraft vary significantly from the more generic aircraft attributes covered by outside publications, or based on the expected net sales price for the aircraft.

~~For~~Certain ~~level 3~~ assets ~~that~~are ~~were~~ measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis ~~during~~using ~~the~~significant ~~three months~~unobservable ~~ended~~inputs ~~March~~(Level ~~31,~~3). ~~2012,~~The ~~the following~~ table below presents the ~~fair~~non-recurring ~~value~~losses ofrecognized ~~those~~for ~~assets~~the assix ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~measurement date~~June 30, ~~valuation~~and ~~techniques~~the fair value and asset classification of the related ~~unobservable~~assets ~~inputs~~as of ~~those~~the ~~assets.~~impairment date:

	Fair Value		ValuationTechniques				UnobservableInput				QuantitativeInputs Used
	2012								2011
Equipment under operating leases & Assets held for sale or re-lease	$25			Market approach				Aircraft valuepublications				$24 - $53(1) Median $35
		FairValue				TotalLosses				FairValue				TotalLosses
								Aircraft conditionadjustments				$(10) - $0(2)Net $(10)
Assets
Equipment under operating leases	$	12			$	(2	)		$	49	(1)		$	(10	)
Assets held for sale or re-lease		13				(12	)			15	(1)			(4	)
Total	$	25			$	(14	)		$	64			$	(14	)

⁽¹⁾

For an asset that incurred impairments in both Equipment under operating leases and Assets held for sale or re-lease, the losses are reflected in the asset’s classification as of the time of the respective impairments while the fair value of the asset as of the date of the latest impairment is reflected only in the asset’s current classification. As of June 30, 2012, such asset with a fair value of $7 changed classification from Equipment under operating leases to Assets held for sale or re-lease.

For level 3 assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2012, the following table presents the fair value of those assets as of the measurement date, valuation techniques and related unobservable inputs of those assets.

Fair Value

Valuation
Techniques

Unobservable Input

Quantitative

Inputs Used

Equipment under operating leases & Assets held for sale or re-lease

Market approach

Aircraft value
publications

$24 - $53⁽¹⁾

Median $35

Aircraft condition
adjustments

$(10) - $0⁽²⁾

Net $(10)

⁽¹⁾

The range represents the sum of the highest and lowest values for all aircraft subject to fair value measurement, according to the third party aircraft valuation publications that we use in our valuation process.

⁽²⁾

The negative amount represents the sum for all aircraft subject to fair value measurement, of all downward adjustments based on consideration of individual aircraft attributes and condition. The positive amount represents the sum of all such upward adjustments.

The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments for which we did not elect the fair value option:

	March 31, 2012									December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
		Carrying			Fair Value						Carrying			Fair
	CarryingValue			Fair Value Level 2			CarryingValue			FairValue
		Value			Level1			Level 2			Value			Value
Assets
Assets
Notes and other	$	563	(1)	$	617		$	594	(1)	$	639
Notes and other		$ 552	(1)	$	–			$ 611			$ 594(1)		$	639
Liabilities
Liabilities
Debt, excluding capital lease obligations	$	(2,539	)	$	(2,722	)	$	(3,357	)	$	(3,497	)
Debt, excluding capital lease obligations		$(2,582)		$	–			$(2,717	)		$(3,357)		$	(3,497	)

(1) At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, net of allowance for losses of $25 and $27.

Items not included in the above disclosure are cash (Level 1), time deposits (Level 2), and accounts payable (Level 2). The carrying value of those items approximate their fair value at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011 as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

Notes and other. The fair value of our variable rate notes that reprice frequently approximate their carrying values. The fair value of fixed rate notes is estimated using discounted cash flows analysis using interest rates currently offered on loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Debt. ~~The~~A ~~fair~~significant portion ~~value~~ of our debt ~~that~~ is ~~actively~~ traded in the secondary market isand ~~classified~~the asfair avalue ~~level~~of 2such ~~valuation~~debt ~~and~~ is based on current market ~~yields~~yield. For our remaining debt that is not ~~actively~~ traded in the secondary market, the fair value is ~~classified as a level 2 valuation and is~~ estimated using discounted cash flows analysis using our indicative borrowing cost derived from dealer quotes.

Financing commitments. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of future financing commitments because the amount and timing of funding those commitments are uncertain.

Note 8 – Concentrations

A significant portion of our portfolio is concentrated among a few customers and in distinct geographic regions, particularly in the United States. Our portfolio is also concentrated by varying degrees across aircraft product types and vintages. Our concentration risk is mitigated in part by intercompany guarantees from Boeing with respect to certain portfolio assets, which primarily relate to 717 aircraft.

Portfolio carrying values for our five largest customers were as follows:

	March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012					December 31, 2011
	CarryingValue		% of TotalPortfolio			CarryingValue		% of TotalPortfolio
AirTran/Southwest	$	$1,~~245~~226		29.87	%	$	1,261		29.2%
Continental		~~408~~400		9.87			415		9.6
Hawaiian		~~406~~399		9.7			374		8.7
American		~~322~~305		7.74			350		8.1
Korean		~~155~~153		3.87			159		3.7
		$2,536		60.8	%	$	2,559		59.3%
	$	2,483		60.2	%	$	2,559		59.3%

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, AirTran Holdings, ~~Inc.~~LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest), accounted for 1718% and 21% of our revenue. On July 8, 2012, BCC, Boeing, Southwest and Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) reached agreement whereby the 717 aircraft on lease to AirTran Airways, Inc. (AirTran) will be subleased from AirTran to Delta on a phased-in basis beginning in 2013, with the sublease scheduled for the duration of the lease term between BCC and AirTran. Delta has committed to lease these 717 aircraft from us for an additional seven-year period following the expiration of the sublease.

Portfolio carrying values were represented in the following regions:

	March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
	June 30, 2012					December 31, 2011
	CarryingValue	~~CarryingValue~~	% of TotalPortfolio	~~% of TotalPortfolio~~		CarryingValue	~~CarryingValue~~	% of TotalPortfolio	~~% of TotalPortfolio~~
United States(1)	$	$32,~~083~~938		7371.92	%	$	$3,186		73.8%
Europe		~~672~~742		1618.10			693		16.1
Asia/Australia		~~228~~258		56.53			241		5.6
Latin America		7775		1.8			79		1.8
Other		~~114~~112		2.7			116		2.7
		$4,174		100.0	%		$4,315		100.0%
	$	4,125		100.0	%	$	4,315		100.0%

⁽¹⁾

United States includes assets held for sale or re-lease that may be physically located in another region.

Portfolio carrying values were represented by the following product types:

	March 31,2012		December 31,2011
	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
717	$	1,~~974~~945	$	2,001
757		~~598~~561		631
737		~~383~~374		408
MD-11		~~303~~318		311
767		~~292~~274		316
747		~~219~~212		225
MD-80		171		171
777		~~125~~122		134
Other(1)		~~109~~148		118
	$	4,~~174~~125	$	4,315

⁽¹⁾

Other includes aircraft, equipment, notes and stock. Some of these aircraft are out of production, but are supported by the manufacturer or other third party parts and service providers.

Our aircraft portfolio by vintage, based on carrying value (excluding investments and pooled assets), are categorized as follows:

	March 31,2012			December 31,2011
	June 30,2012			December 31,2011
2007 and newer		3.5	%		3.5%
2002 – 2006		45.53			45.3
1997 – 2001		39.36			38.8
1996 and older		11.76			12.4
		100.0	%		100.0%

Note 9 – Discontinued Operations

On May 24, 2004, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation (GECC) to sell substantially all of the assets related to our Commercial Financial Services business. The final asset sale closed December 27, 2004.

Part of the purchase and sale agreement with GECC includes a loss sharing arrangement for losses that may exist at the end of the initial and subsequent financing periods of the transferred portfolio assets, or in some instances, prior to the end of the financing period. Such losses may result from asset sales, provisions for loss or asset impairment charges offset by gains from asset sales. The loss sharing arrangement provides that cumulative net losses (if any) are to be shared between us and GECC. ~~The provisions effectively limit our exposure to any losses to $245.~~ At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, our maximum future cash exposure to loss associated with the loss sharing arrangement, which considers the impact of the portfolio reduction, was $~~205~~147, for which we have accrued a liability of $4643.

The following table reconciles the reserve under the loss sharing arrangement, which is included in Other liabilities for the three months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
Reserve at beginning of period	$	53		$	82
Increase in reserve		–			3
Payments to GECC		(7	)		–
Reserve at end of period	$	46		$	85

The following table reconciles the reserve under the loss sharing arrangement, which is included in Other liabilities for the six months ended June 30:


	2012			2011
Reserve at beginning of period	$	53		$	82
Increase in reserve		–			4
Payments to GECC		(10	)		(8	)
Reserve at end of period	$	43		$	78

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

Boeing Capital Corporation

Renton, Washington

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Boeing Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, and the related condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and of shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for the ~~three~~six-month periods ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Boeing Capital Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder’s equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 9, 2012, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington

~~April~~July 25, 2012

1516

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “projects,”, “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “targets,” “anticipates” and similar expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements relating to our future financial condition and operating results, future portfolio size, amounts of new aircraft financing, future levels of indebtedness and debt-to-equity ratios, the outcome of contingencies as well as any other statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions, which may not prove to be accurate. These statements are not guarantees and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from these forward-looking statements. Among these factors are risks related to:

–

the financial condition of the airline industry, which could be adversely affected by changes in general economic conditions, credit ratings, increases in fuel-related costs, the liquidity of the global financial markets, responses to increasing environmental concerns, as well as events such as war, terrorist attacks or a serious health epidemic;

–

the impact of bankruptcies, restructurings or mergers and acquisitions on commercial airline customers;

–

the impact of changes in aircraft valuations;

–

the sufficiency of our liquidity, including access to capital markets;

–

the impact on us of strategic decisions by The Boeing Company (Boeing), including the amount of financing necessary to support the sale of Boeing products, the level and types of transactional or other support made available to us by Boeing and the ending of production of certain aircraft programs;

–

the market acceptance of Boeing products;

–

a decline in Boeing’s or our financial performance, outlook or credit ratings;

–

the availability of commercial and governmental financing, which can be affected by a number of factors, including global economic conditions, economic and monetary crises, legislative and regulatory changes, and availability of and policies regarding governmental export finance support;

–

the extent to which we are called upon to fund Boeing’s and our outstanding financing commitments or satisfy other financing requests, and our ability to satisfy those requirements;

–

reduced lease rates as a result of competition in the used aircraft market, or the inability to maintain aircraft on lease at satisfactory lease rates;

–

financial, legal, tax, regulatory, legislative and accounting changes or actions that may affect the overall performance of our business;

–

the adequacy of coverage of our allowance for losses on receivables; and

–

volatility in our earnings due to the timing of asset sales, other risk mitigation activities, fluctuations in our portfolio size and changes in interest rates.

Additional information concerning these and other factors can be found in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the “Risk Factors” on pages 3 through 5 of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations” and Note 6 to our condensed Financial Statements included in this report and our Current Reports on Form 8-K. Any forward-looking statement herein speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

1617

Item 2. Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations

Overview

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we continued to focus on supporting Boeing’s major businesses and managing our overall financial exposures.

Sources of financing continued to be sufficient for aircraft deliveries and as a result we provided no financing for Boeing aircraft deliveries during the first ~~quarter~~half of 2012.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, our portfolio consisted of equipment under operating leases, finance leases, notes and other receivables, assets held for sale or re-lease and investments. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we owned ~~225~~222 commercial aircraft and had partial ownership or security interest in an additional 50 aircraft. Our portfolio at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 decreased to $4.21 billion from $4.3 billion at at December 31, 2011. The following table summarizes the net change in our total portfolio:

(Dollars in millions)	~~Three~~Six Months ~~EndedMarch~~EndedJune 3130, 2012			Year EndedDecember 31,2011
New business volume	$	361		$	239
Write-offs		–			(11	)
Transfer of assets		6			–
Asset impairment and other charges		(1516	)		(117	)
Asset run off and prepayments		(92161	)		(257	)
Asset dispositions		(9	)		(82	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(3471	)		(151	)
Net change in portfolio balance	$	(~~141~~190	)	$	(379	)

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had $~~510~~418 million and $521 million of assets that were held ~~for~~ for sale or re-lease, of which $~~402~~293 million and $476 million had either executed term sheets with deposits or firm contracts to be sold or placed on lease. Additionally, aircraft subject to leases with a carrying value of approximately $8985 million ~~are~~ are scheduled to be returned off lease in the next 12 months. These aircraft are being remarketed or we are seeking to have the leases extended.

~~Our~~On ~~net~~July 8, ~~income~~2012, ~~was~~BCC, ~~$24~~Boeing, ~~million~~Southwest ~~for~~Airlines Co. (Southwest) and Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) reached agreement whereby the ~~three~~717 ~~months~~aircraft ~~ended~~on ~~March 31~~lease to AirTran Airways, ~~2012~~Inc. ~~compared~~(AirTran), a wholly owned subsidiary of Southwest, will be subleased from AirTran to Delta on a phased-in basis beginning in 2013, with ~~$31~~the ~~million~~sublease scheduled for the ~~same~~duration ~~period~~of inthe ~~2011,~~lease aterm ~~decrease~~between BCC and AirTran. Delta has committed to lease these 717 aircraft from us for an additional seven-year period following the expiration of $7the ~~million~~sublease.

Our net income was $43 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with $70 million for the same period in 2011, a decrease of $27 million.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Revenue

Revenue was $~~125~~ 224 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared with $~~143~~290 million for the same period in 2011, a decrease of $1866 million.

Finance lease income was $2141 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, a decrease of $1428 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to ~~lower~~the ~~negotiated~~revised ~~rents~~contractual onterms ~~certain~~of ~~finance~~our leases with AirTran negotiated in conjunction with receiving a full guarantee from Southwest of those lease payment obligations in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Interest income on notes receivables was $1122 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, an increase of $36 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to higher weighted average notes receivable balance partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average effective interest rate during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

~~Operating~~18 lease income was $69 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, a decrease of $21 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in the equipment under operating leases as a result of the return of aircraft. Without the support from Boeing in the form of intercompany guarantees our Operating lease income, which includes income applied to assets classified as held for re-lease, would have been $12 million and $16 million less than reported, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. For a discussion of our relationship with Boeing, see Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 2 – Transactions with Boeing.

~~Other~~Operating lease income was $24135 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ana ~~increase~~decrease of ~~$19~~ $46 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to ~~higher~~a decrease in the equipment under operating leases as a result of the return of aircraft. ~~maintenance~~Without ~~reserves~~the ~~taken~~support tofrom Boeing in the form of intercompany guarantees our Operating lease income, ~~from~~which ~~expired~~includes ~~leases~~income applied to assets classified as held for re-lease, would have been $26 million and $33 million less than reported, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. For a discussion of our relationship with Boeing, see Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 2 – Transactions with Boeing.

Net gain on disposal of assets was $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $13 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to a gain recognized in 2011 upon signing a sales type lease agreement for aircraft previously held as Equipment under operating leases.

Other income was $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $15 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to higher aircraft maintenance reserves taken to income from expired leases.

Expenses

Expenses were $87157 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared with $91176 million for the same period in 2011, a decrease of $4 19 million.

Interest expense was $2848 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, a decrease of $514 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in the weighted average effective interest rate and in the weighted average balance of debt outstanding as a result of scheduled debt repayments.

Depreciation expense was $3471 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, a decrease of $812 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to a lower depreciable balance of equipment as a result of asset dispositions.

The recovery of losses was $3 4 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, compared with a recovery of $69 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease in our allowance through a recovery of losses for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was due to the effect of run-off of our finance leases partially offset by declines in aircraft collateral value.

Asset impairment expense was $14 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, ~~an increase of $5 million compared with the same period in 2011. The asset impairment expense during the first three months of 2012 was~~ primarily due to a reduction in expected sales price of certain aircraft.

Provision for income tax

Provision for income tax was $1424 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, a decrease of $517 million compared with the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax income.

Loss on disposal of discontinued operations

Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax, was $23 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 due to an increase in our expected losses from claims associated with specific assets subject to the loss sharing agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation related to the sale of certain assets of our Commercial Financial Services business in 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash and cash equivalents balance was $~~399~~386 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, a decrease from $941 million at December 31, 2011. The following is a summary of the change in our cash and cash equivalents for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130:

(Dollars in millions)	2012			2011
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(18	)	$	25
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	8		$	86
Net cash provided by investing activities		~~295~~318			~~707~~710
Net cash used in financing activities		(~~819~~881	)		(~~977~~1,018	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(~~542~~555	)	$	(~~245~~222	)

~~Operating~~19 ~~activities~~

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, net cash used in operating activities included net income from operations of $24 million. We had net adjustments for non-cash items of $32 million, which primarily related to depreciation expense and asset impairment expense, partially offset by a reduction in deferred income taxes. We also had a net decrease in cash due to changes in assets and liabilities of $74 million.

~~During~~Operating ~~the three months ended March 31, 2011, net cash provided by operating~~ activities included net income from operations of $31 million. We had net adjustments for non-cash items of $22 million, which primarily related to depreciation expense. We also had a net decrease in cash due to changes in assets and liabilities of $28 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, net cash used in operating activities included net income from operations of $43 million. We had net adjustments for non-cash items of $12 million, which primarily related to depreciation expense and asset impairment expense, partially offset by a reduction in deferred income taxes. We also had a net decrease in cash due to changes in assets and liabilities of $47 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities included net income from operations of $70 million. We had net adjustments for non-cash items of $47 million, which primarily related to depreciation expense. We also had a net decrease in cash due to changes in assets and liabilities of $31 million.

Investing activities

During the ~~three~~ ~~months~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, net cash provided by investing activities primarily included net proceeds of $200 million from short-term investment maturities and payments of leases, notes and other receivables of $92161 million.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, net cash provided by investing activities primarily included net proceeds of $~~600~~500 million from short-term investment maturities and payments of leases, notes and other receivables of $82155 million.

Financing activities

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, we made debt repayments of $~~774~~819 million and $~~786~~790 million and paid dividends (including return of capital) of $4562 million and $~~191~~228 million.

Outstanding debt at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $2.6 billion and $3.4 billion, of which $~~708~~692 million will be due in the next 12 months. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding. Our leverage (ratio of Debt to Shareholder’s equity) at ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was 5.10-to-1 and 6.3-to-1.

We require liquidity, primarily to fund financing commitments, meet debt obligations and fund our operating expenses. Financing commitments made by us and Boeing totaled $1920.63 billion as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. We anticipate that we will not be required to fund a significant portion of our financing commitments as we continue to work with third party financiers to provide alternative financing to customers. However, there can be no assurances that we will not be required to fund greater amounts than historically required. In addition, many of Boeing’s non-U.S. customers finance aircraft purchases through the Export-Import Bank of the United States. The bank’s charter is set to expire on May 31, 2012 and its authorized funding limit may be reached prior to that date. If the bank’s charter is not renewed or if the bank’s existing or future funding authority is insufficient to meet our customers’ needs, we may fund additional commitments and/or enter into new financing arrangements with customers.

On November 29, 2011, American Airlines filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Some possible outcomes that may occur as a result of the bankruptcy could cause a significant amount of deferred taxes to be accelerated which may impact our near-term cash requirements.

We expect that any future liquidity needs would be met by issuing commercial paper or term debt, or obtaining funding from Boeing. There can be no assurance that the cost or availability of funding sources to us will not be adversely impacted in the future.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we have a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shelf registration statement for issuance of debt securities. During the first quarter of 2012, we established under the registration statement a $1 billion medium-term notes program. We have not issued any securities under that program. The availability of funding pursuant to the medium-term note program otherwise under our SEC registration statement will depend on investor demand and market conditions.

We believe we have adequate borrowing capacity. We have a commercial paper program that continues to serve as a potential source of short-term liquidity. We have $1.5 billion available exclusively for us under Boeing’s committed revolving credit line agreements for general corporate purposes., Weincluding ~~anticipate~~serving ~~that these credit lines will primarily serve~~ as backup liquidity to support possible commercial paper borrowings. In addition, we have a support agreement with Boeing under which Boeing has committed to make contributions to us if our fixed-charge coverage ratio, as defined in the support agreement, falls below 1.05-to-1 on a four-quarter rolling basis.

1920

Risks that could affect our sources of liquidity include, among others;

–

a downturn in the economy,

–

significant restructurings, defaults or bankruptcies by airlines,

–

disruptions in the global capital markets, and

–

a decrease in our and/or Boeing’s credit ratings and/or financial performance.

We continually assess our leverage, as measured by our Debt to Shareholder’s equity ratio, in light of the risks in our business, including those set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Additional Disclosures Regarding Allowance for Losses on Receivables and Asset Impairment Expense

The following tables reconcile the changes in the allowance for losses on receivables and asset impairment expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011. Column 3 presents this information, calculated in accordance with our accounting policy, if the impact of intercompany guarantees from Boeing were excluded. The exclusion of the net impact of intercompany guarantees shown in Column 2 would increase the applicable exposure for various receivables and would increase asset impairment expense. Management believes that the presentation of this information provides more complete information on the effect of intercompany guarantees provided by Boeing.

(Dollars in millions)	(1)			(2)			(3)
2012	Allowancefor losses			Impact ofintercompanyguaranteesfrom Boeing			Allowanceexcludingintercompanyguarantees
Allowance for losses on receivables at beginning of period	$	53		$	19		$	72
Recovery of losses		(34	)		–1			(3	)
Allowance for losses on receivables at end of period	$	5049		$	1920		$	69
Allowance as a percentage of total receivables		2.2	%					3.1	%
2011
Allowance for losses on receivables at beginning of period	$	87		$	266		$	353
Recovery of losses		(69	)		(961	)		(1570	)
Allowance for losses on receivables at end of period	$	81		$	257		$	338
Write-offs		(11	)		(2	)		(13	)
Allowance as a percentage of total receivables		3.7	%					15.4	%
Allowance for losses on receivables at end of period	$	67		$	203		$	270
Allowance as a percentage of total receivables		3.0	%					11.9	%

(Dollars in millions)	(1)		(2)		(3)
2012	Assetimpairmentexpense		Impact ofintercompanyguaranteesfrom Boeing		Impairmentexcludingintercompanyguarantees
Asset impairment expense	$	14	$	–	$	14
2011
Asset impairment expense	$	914	$	–	$	914

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

20Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012 and have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012 and have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2012 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal ~~control~~ control over financial reporting.

2122

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Immaterial Restatement

Subsequent to the issuance of our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 we determined that it should have reflected Finance lease receivables of $1,727 million, as compared to the $1,739 million reported, and the difference of $12 million should have been reflected as a reduction in Finance lease income for the year ended December 31, 2011. In connection with the November 2011 bankruptcy filing by American Airlines, Inc. (American Airlines), certain lease payments by American Airlines beginning in May 2012, the first scheduled payments under the relevant leases since the bankruptcy filing, are required to be allocated exclusively to various non-recourse debt holders, at higher interest rates, until all such holders are paid in full, and only thereafter to us. The reallocation of payments required us to recalculate our investment in leveraged leases for the year ended December 31, 2011. This reallocation of payments does not affect amounts payable under these leases by American Airlines. The reallocation of payments also does not alter our expectation that we will not incur any losses related to American Airlines receivables as a result of the bankruptcy.

Management believes that the effect of this recalculation is not material to our previously issued consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. We will prospectively correct in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K the previously presented consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 and the consolidated statement of operations, shareholder’s equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2011.

2223

The impact on specific line items in the December 31, 2011 balance sheet, and the consolidated statement of operations and statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2011 and certain disclosures in Note 3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K are presented below (in millions):


	As of December 31, 2011
Balance Sheet Items:	As Previously Reported		Restated
Finance leases	$	1,739	$	1,727
Total receivables, gross of allowance		2,360		2,348
Total receivables, net of allowance		2,307		2,295
Total assets		5,578		5,566
Accounts with Boeing		77		76
Deferred income taxes		1,236		1,232
Total liabilities		5,034		5,029
Retained earnings		15		8
Shareholder’s equity		544		537
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	5,578	$	5,566


	Year ended December 31, 2011
Statement of Operations Items:	As Previously Reported		Restated
Finance lease income	$	125	$	113
Total revenue		532		520
Income from continuing operations before provision for income tax		123		111
Provision for income tax		45		40
Income from continuing operations		78		71
Net income	$	83	$	76


	Year ended December 31, 2011
Statement of Cash Flows Items:	As Previously Reported			Restated
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	83		$	76
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Non-cash items:
Asset impairment expense and other charges		105			117
Decrease in deferred income taxes		(135	)		(139	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts with Boeing	$	9		$	8

Scheduled minimum lease payments on Finance leases as previously reported in Note 3 of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K and as restated are as follows for the years ended December 31:

As Previously Reported	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		Thereafter
Finance leases (1)	$	292	$	244	$	178	$	172	$	174	$	837
Finance leases(1)	$	292	$	244	$	178	$	172	$	174	$	837
Restated	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		Thereafter
Finance leases (1)	$	266	$	229	$	170	$	170	$	170	$	910
Finance leases(1)	$	266	$	229	$	170	$	170	$	170	$	910

⁽¹⁾

Includes both direct finance leases and leveraged leases (less principal and interest payable on non-recourse debt).

2324

Item 6. Exhibits

A. Exhibits



	Exhibit 12			Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

	Exhibit 15			Letter From Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information.

	Exhibit 31.1			Certification of President pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Exhibit 31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Exhibit 32.1			Certification of President pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This document is being furnished in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

	Exhibit 32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This document is being furnished in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8212 and 34-47551.

	Exhibit 101.INS			XBRL Instance Document

	Exhibit 101.SCH			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

	Exhibit 101.CAL			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

	Exhibit 101.DEF			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

	Exhibit 101.LAB			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

	Exhibit 101.PRE			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, we are not filing certain instruments with respect to our debt, as the total amount of securities currently provided for under each of the instruments does not exceed 10 percent of our total assets on a consolidated basis. We hereby agree to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

2425

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		Boeing Capital Corporation
April 25, 2012		/s/ KELVIN E. COUNCIL
July 25, 2012		/s/ KELVIN E. COUNCIL
		Kelvin E. Council Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and Registrant’s Authorized Officer
April 25, 2012		/s/ KEVIN J. MURPHY
July 25, 2012		/s/ KEVIN J. MURPHY
		Kevin J. Murphy Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

2526

Filing Compare · BOEING CAPITAL CORP