UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

xþ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ~~December 31, 2011~~ to ~~March 31, 2012~~

(Commission File no.) 1-12845

(Commission File no.)

Brightpoint, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Indiana		35-1778566
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7635 Interactive Way, Suite 200, Indianapolis, Indiana		46278
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(317) 707-2355

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~Yes~~þ xYes No ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ~~Yes~~ þ xYes No ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer xþ Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No xþ

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of ~~April~~August 233, 2012: 69,~~096~~161,~~474~~728

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Brightpoint, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of ~~Income~~Operations

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenue
Distribution	$	1,~~234~~140,~~344~~595		$	~~984~~1,~~653~~091,985		$	2,374,939		$	2,076,638
Logistic services		~~135~~125,~~744~~724			~~130~~142,~~227~~929			261,467			273,156
Total revenue		1,~~370~~266,~~088~~319			1,~~114~~234,~~880~~914			2,636,406			2,349,794
Cost of revenue
Distribution		1,~~194~~106,~~583~~505			~~950~~1,~~629~~050,405			2,301,088			2,001,034
Logistic services		8981,~~831~~025			7791,~~722~~382			170,856			169,104
Total cost of revenue		1,~~284~~187,~~414~~530			1,~~028~~141,~~351~~787			2,471,944			2,170,138
Gross profit
Distribution		3934,~~761~~090			3441,~~024~~580			73,851			75,604
Logistic services		4544,~~913~~699			5251,~~505~~547			90,611			104,052
Total gross profit		85,674			86,529
Gross profit		78,789			93,127			164,462			179,656
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6662,~~946~~578			6568,~~646~~976			129,524			134,623
Amortization expense		6,971			5,792
Merger and acquisition expenses		6,750			486			6,750			486
Restructuring charges		2,419			385
Amortization expense		6,463			6,040			13,434			11,832
Operating income from continuing operations		9,338			14,706
Restructuring charge		2,196			3,784			4,615			4,169
Interest, net		3,891			2,965
Operating income from continuing operations		802			13,841			10,139			28,546
Other expense (income)		(224	)		1,175
Interest, net		3,894			4,360			7,785			7,325
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		5,671			10,566
Gain on investment in Intcomex, Inc.		—			(3,038	)		—			(3,038	)
Income tax expense		2,608			2,559
Other (income) expense		(1,129	)		220			(1,354	)		1,394
Income from continuing operations		3,063			8,007
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,963	)		12,299			3,708			22,865
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes:
Income tax expense		2,721			533			5,329			3,092
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(268	)		1,830
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(4,684	)		11,766			(1,621	)		19,773
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations		(280	)		(541	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes:
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(548	)		1,289
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(94	)		(860	)		(362	)		970
Net income		2,515			9,296
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations		272			(232	)		(8	)		(773	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		125			—
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes		178			(1,092	)		(370	)		197
Net income attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	2,640		$	9,296
Net income (loss)		(4,506	)		10,674			(1,991	)		19,970
Earnings per share attributable to common shareholders—basic:
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		442			—			567			—
Income from continuing operations	$	0.05		$	0.12
Net income (loss) attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(4,064	)	$	10,674		$	(1,424	)	$	19,970
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.01	)		0.02
Earnings per share attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders—basic:
Net income	$	0.04		$	0.14
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.06	)	$	0.18		$	(0.02	)	$	0.30
Earnings per share attributable to common shareholders—diluted:
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			(0.02	)		—			—
Income from continuing operations	$	0.05		$	0.11
Net income (loss)	$	(0.06	)	$	0.16		$	(0.02	)	$	0.30
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.01	)		0.02
Earnings per share attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders—diluted:
Net income	$	0.04		$	0.13
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.06	)	$	0.18		$	(0.02	)	$	0.29
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			(0.02	)		—			—
Basic		68,335			67,453
Net income (loss)	$	(0.06	)	$	0.16		$	(0.02	)	$	0.29
Diluted		69,715			68,917
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		68,769			67,833			68,552			67,644
Diluted		68,769			68,682			68,552			68,952

See accompanying notes

Brightpoint, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net income	$	2,515		$	9,296
Net income (loss)	$	(4,506	)	$	10,674		$	(1,991	)	$	19,970
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax:
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net gain arising during period		336			852
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments:
Foreign currency translation, net of tax:
Net gain (loss) arising during period		657			(55	)		994			797
Net gain arising during period		8,377			9,440
Pension benefit obligation:
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of tax		620			63
Net gain arising during period		—			53			—			53
Comprehensive income	$	11,848		$	19,651
Reclassification adjustment for prior service cost included in net periodic pension cost		—			204			—			204
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		125			—
Foreign currency translation:
Comprehensive income attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	11,973		$	19,651
Net gain (loss) arising during period		(11,492	)		5,776			(3,115	)		15,216
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income		273			(2,931	)		893			(2,868	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(10,562	)		3,047			(1,228	)		13,402
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(15,068	)	$	13,721		$	(3,219	)	$	33,372
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		442			—			567			—
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(14,626	)	$	13,721		$	(2,652	)	$	33,372

See accompanying notes

Brightpoint, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

	March 31,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2330,~~538~~047		$	40,842
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,416 in 2012 and $8,236 in 2011)		517,239			568,947
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,204 in 2012 and $8,236 in 2011)		480,349			568,947
Inventories		~~469~~395,~~209~~163			468,937
Other current assets		7566,~~724~~146			66,039
Total current assets		1971,~~085,710~~705			1,144,765
Property and equipment, net		~~145~~141,~~093~~664			145,948
Goodwill		86,838			79,578
Other intangibles, net		105,010			98,693
Other intangibles, net		114,825			98,693
Other assets		40,537			37,927
Other assets		39,606			37,927
Goodwill		86,470			79,578
Total assets	$	1,~~472~~345,~~072~~386		$	1,506,911
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	~~693~~679,~~434~~183		$	766,825
Accrued expenses		~~137~~142,~~259~~890			171,108
Lines of credit and other short-term borrowings		~~645~~9,100			6,465
Total current liabilities		831,~~338~~173			944,398
Long-term liabilities:
Lines of credit, long-term		~~296~~185,~~048~~874			246,542
Other long-term liabilities		3231,~~433~~348			24,806
Total long-term liabilities		~~328~~217,~~481~~222			271,348
Total liabilities		1,~~159~~048,~~819~~395			1,215,746
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000 shares authorized; 92,736 issued in 2012 and 91,470 issued in 2011		927			915
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000 shares authorized; 92,787 issued in 2012 and 91,470 issued in 2011		928			915
Additional paid-in-capital		660,~~614~~793			656,533
Treasury stock, at cost, 23,594 shares in 2012 and 23,226 shares in 2011		(171,807	)		(168,064	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 23,610 shares in 2012 and 23,226 shares in 2011		(171,884	)		(168,064	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		187,~~257~~695			8,923
Accumulated deficit		(~~204~~208,~~503~~566	)		(207,142	)
Total Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders’ equity		~~303~~288,~~488~~966			291,165
Non-controlling interest		8,~~765~~025			—
Total shareholders’ equity		~~312~~296,~~253~~991			291,165
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,~~472~~345,~~072~~386		$	1,506,911

See accompanying notes

Brightpoint, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011
Operating activities
Net income	$	2,515		$	9,296
Net income (loss)	$	(1,991	)	$	19,970
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1325,~~086~~953			1122,~~280~~789
Non-cash compensation		35,~~202~~576			36,~~702~~416
Restructuring charge		24,~~419~~615			~~385~~4,169
Change in deferred taxes		~~(508~~4,537	)		43,~~361~~410
Other non-cash		(213	)		752
Gain on investment in Intcomex, Inc.		—			(3,038	)
Other non-cash		(451	)		616
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures:
Accounts receivable		6283,~~340~~342			7747,~~537~~874
Inventories		1272,~~047~~960			(5325,~~655~~414	)
Other operating assets		(118,~~076~~648	)		1115,~~016~~411
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(~~129~~117,~~249~~096	)		(~~162~~111,~~059~~249	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(45,437	)		(97,385	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		68,797			(19,046	)
Investing activities
Capital expenditures		(59,~~497~~132	)		(2237,~~830~~725	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(9,426	)		(~~111~~16,420	)
Decrease in other assets		2,273			590
Decrease (increase) in other assets		1,773			(518	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1216,~~650~~785	)		(2254,~~351~~663	)
Financing activities
Net proceeds from lines of credit		42,063			105,369
Net proceeds from (repayments on) lines of credit		(55,971	)		55,019
Borrowings (repayments) on short-term financing		139			(407	)
Repayments on short-term financing		(69	)		(407	)
Deferred financing costs paid		—			(~~281~~297	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(3,~~743~~821	)		(3,778	)
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation		870			1,983
Excess (deficient) tax benefit from equity based compensation		(1,389	)		1,992
Proceeds from common stock issuances under employee stock option plans		—			394
Net cash provided by financing activities		39,329			103,280
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(61,250	)		52,923
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(1,~~454~~557	)		12,~~794~~944
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1710,~~304~~795	)		(1417,~~662~~842	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		40,842			41,658
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2330,~~538~~047		$	2623,~~996~~816

See accompanying notes

Brightpoint, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

General

The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes necessary for fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Operating results from interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year as a whole. The Company is subject to seasonal patterns that generally affect the wireless device industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates, but management does not believe such differences will materially affect Brightpoint, Inc.’s financial position or results of operations. The Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments considered, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the results for the periods. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

For further information, including the Company’s significant accounting policies, refer to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011. As used herein, the terms “BrightPoint”, “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” mean Brightpoint, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Pending Merger

On June 29, 2012, Brightpoint, Inc., Ingram Micro Inc., (Ingram Micro) and Beacon Sub, Inc., (Merger Sub), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the Merger), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ingram Micro. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Brightpoint, Inc. issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, will be converted into the right to receive $9.00 in cash, excluding treasury shares and shares held by any direct or indirect subsidiary of Ingram Micro (other than Merger Sub). The Merger Agreement also provides that at the effective time, each outstanding restricted stock unit, restricted stock award and restricted share of common stock granted under any Company stock plan will be converted into the right to receive $9.00 in cash. The total amount expected to be paid in the Merger with respect to the Company’s outstanding common stock and outstanding equity awards, including outstanding debt (net of cash) as of June 30, 2012 of approximately $165 million, is approximately $820 million.

The Company, Ingram Micro and Merger Sub have made customary representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement, and each has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to consummate the Merger. The Company has also agreed to various covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, (i) to conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course consistent with past practice during the period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the effective time of the Merger and (ii) to cause a special meeting of the Company’s shareholders to be held to consider the approval of the Merger Agreement.

Consummation of the Merger is subject to various conditions, including, (i) the affirmative vote by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Brightpoint, Inc., (ii) the absence of any law, injunction, judgment, ruling, court order, decree or other governmental or court action restraining, enjoining or prohibiting the Merger, (iii) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by the parties, (iv) the performance by the parties in all material respects of their covenants, obligations and agreements under the Merger Agreement and (v) the expiration or early termination of the waiting period applicable to the Merger under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the receipt of other required federal, state and foreign government approvals. The transaction is expected to close before the end of 2012.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for the Company and Ingram Micro including receipt by the Company of a superior proposal. In connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including the Company’s entry into an agreement under an alternative acquisition proposal,

BrightPoint is required to pay the Ingram Micro a termination fee equal to $26.0 million. In addition, subject to certain limitations, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not consummated by March 31, 2013. The Company’s merger related costs associated with the pending merger were $1.8 million during the second quarter of 2012 and consisted of professional and legal fees.

Concurrent with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company amended the Purchase Agreement with Intcomex, Inc. (Intcomex) dated March 16, 2011, and the Shareholders Agreement of Intcomex dated April 19, 2011, to eliminate the non-competition covenants applicable to the Company. In conjunction with these amendments, the Company paid Intcomex $5.0 million and caused its director nominee to resign from Intcomex’s board of directors. This expense is included in “merger and acquisition expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company also entered into an option agreement that grants Intcomex a five-year option, effective upon closing of the Merger, to purchase Intcomex common stock held by the Company for a purchase price of $3.0 million less any dividends paid on such shares to the Company prior to the exercise of the option. As of June 30, 2012, the Company’s investment in Intcomex was $23.0 million, which was included in “other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. If the Merger closes, the Company will write down the carrying value of the investment in Intcomex to reflect the price of the option offered to Intcomex.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, and diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during each period. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Income from continuing operations	$	3,063		$	8,007
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(4,684	)	$	11,766		$	(1,621	)	$	19,773
Loss attributable to non-controlling interest		~~125~~442			—			567			—
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders		3,188			8,007
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders		(4,242	)		11,766			(1,054	)		19,773
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		~~(548~~178	)		(1,~~289~~092	)		(370	)		197
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	2,640		$	9,296
Net income (loss) attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(4,064	)	$	10,674		$	(1,424	)	$	19,970
Earnings per share - basic:
Earnings per share—basic:
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders	$	0.05		$	0.12
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(0.06	)	$	0.18		$	(0.02	)	$	0.30
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		~~(0.01~~—	)		(0.02	)		—			—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	0.04		$	0.14
Net income (loss) attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(0.06	)	$	0.16		$	(0.02	)	$	0.30
Earnings per share - diluted:
Earnings per share—diluted:
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders	$	0.05		$	0.11
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(0.06	)	$	0.18		$	(0.02	)	$	0.29
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		~~(0.01~~—	)		(0.02	)		—			—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	0.04		$	0.13
Net income (loss) attributable to Brightpoint, Inc. shareholders	$	(0.06	)	$	0.16		$	(0.02	)	$	0.29
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share		68,~~335~~769			67,~~453~~833			68,552			67,644
Net effect of dilutive share options, restricted share units, and restricted shares based on the treasury share method using average market price		~~1,380~~—			~~1,464~~849			—			1,308
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share		6968,~~715~~769			68,~~917~~682			68,552			68,952

6Weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 excludes the effect of 0.7 million and 1.2 million common shares outstanding that are excluded from the earnings per share calculation as they are anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

~~Recently~~7 ~~Issued Accounting Pronouncements~~

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASC update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, (“ASC Update No. 2011-05”). ASC Update No. 2011-05 amends existing guidance by allowing only two options for presenting the components of net income and other comprehensive income: (1) in a single continuous financial statement, statement of comprehensive income or (2) in two separate but consecutive financial statements, consisting of an income statement followed by a separate statement of other comprehensive income. Also, items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be presented on the face of the financial statements. ASC Update No. 2011-05 requires retrospective application, and it is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this pronouncement on January 1, 2012.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASC update No. 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, (“ASC Update No. 2011-08”). ASC Update No. 2011-08 amends existing guidance by giving an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If this is the case, companies will need to perform a more detailed two-step goodwill impairment test which is used to identify potential goodwill impairments and to measure the amount of goodwill impairment losses to be recognized, if any. ASU No. 2011-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this pronouncement on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

~~The~~Derivatives ~~Company~~are isheld ~~exposed~~only tofor ~~certain risks related to its ongoing business activities. The primary risk managed by~~ the ~~use~~purpose of ~~derivative~~hedging ~~instruments~~such isrisks, ~~variability~~not infor ~~foreign currency exchange rates~~speculation. ~~Forward contracts~~Generally, ~~are~~the ~~entered~~Company enters into tohedging ~~manage~~relationships such that the ~~foreign~~cash ~~currency~~flows ~~risk~~of ~~associated~~items ~~with~~and ~~various~~transactions ~~commitments~~being ~~arising~~hedged ~~from~~are ~~trade~~expected ~~accounts~~to ~~receivable,~~be ~~trade~~offset ~~accounts~~by ~~payable~~corresponding ~~and~~changes ~~fixed~~in ~~purchase obligations. The Company held~~ the ~~following~~values ~~types~~ of the derivatives. ~~at March 31, 2012 that have been designated as hedging instruments:~~

The Company is exposed to certain risks related to its ongoing business activities. The primary risk managed by the use of derivative instruments is variability in foreign currency exchange rates. Forward contracts are entered into to manage the foreign currency risk associated with various commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and fixed purchase obligations. The Company held the following types of derivatives at June 30, 2012 that have been designated as hedging instruments:

Derivative

Risk Being Hedged

Foreign currency forward contracts

Cash flows of forecasted inventory purchases denominated

in a foreign currency other than the functional currency

The Company ~~had~~enters aninto ~~interest~~foreign ~~rate~~currency ~~swap~~forward ~~related~~contracts with the objective of reducing exposure to ~~$25~~cash flow volatility from foreign currency fluctuations associated with anticipated purchases of inventory.0 Certain ~~million~~components of ~~the~~these ~~Company’s~~contracts ~~variable~~are ~~rate~~accounted ~~debt~~for as cash flow hedges. The ~~swap~~unrealized ~~expired~~gain associated with the effective portion of these contracts included in ~~January~~other ~~2012~~comprehensive income was approximately $0.7 ~~Derivatives~~million ~~are~~and ~~held~~$1.0 ~~only~~million for the ~~purpose~~three ofand ~~hedging~~six ~~such~~months ~~risks~~ended June 30, ~~not~~2012 ~~for~~and ~~speculation.~~the ~~Generally,~~gain ~~the~~is ~~Company~~expected ~~enters~~to be reclassified into ~~hedging~~earnings ~~relationships~~within ~~such~~the ~~that~~next 12 months. The amount of gain (loss) associated with the ~~cash~~ineffective ~~flows~~portion of ~~items~~these contracts was immaterial for the three and ~~transactions~~six ~~being~~months ~~hedged~~ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Certain components of the foreign currency forward contracts are ~~expected~~not todesignated beas ~~offset~~hedges under byU.S. ~~corresponding~~GAAP. ~~changes~~The inobjective of these contracts is to offset the ~~values~~transaction gain or loss from the remeasurement of certain assets denominated in foreign currencies with the ~~derivatives.~~gain or loss from the fair value market valuation of these forward contracts.

The ~~Company~~fair ~~enters~~value ~~into~~of foreign currency forward contracts ~~with~~for ~~the~~forecasted ~~objective~~inventory ~~of reducing~~purchases ~~exposure~~denominated toin ~~cash~~a ~~flow volatility from~~ foreign currency ~~fluctuations associated with anticipated purchases of inventory. Certain components of these contracts are accounted for~~ as ~~cash flow hedges. The unrealized gain associated with the effective portion~~ of ~~these contracts included in other comprehensive income was approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~and the gain (loss)~~ is ~~expected~~an toasset beof ~~reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months~~$2. ~~The~~9 ~~amount~~million ofincluded ~~gain~~in ~~(loss)~~“other ~~associated~~current ~~with~~assets” ~~the~~in ~~ineffective portion of these contracts was immaterial for~~ the ~~three~~Consolidated ~~months~~Balance ~~ended~~Sheet ~~March 31,~~as ~~2012~~well ~~and~~as ~~2011.~~a ~~Certain~~liability ~~components~~ of ~~the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as hedges under U~~$2.S.9 ~~GAAP.~~million ~~The~~included ~~objective~~in of“accrued ~~these~~expenses” ~~contracts~~in ~~is to offset~~ the ~~gain~~Consolidated orBalance ~~loss from the remeasurement of foreign currency forward contracts with the gain or loss from the fair value market valuation of these forward contracts~~Sheet.

The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts for forecasted inventory purchases denominated in a foreign currency as of March 31, 2012 is an asset of $0.2 million included in “other current assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as well as a liability of $2.6 million included in “accrued expenses” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011 of the Company’s borrowings approximate their fair value because these borrowings bear interest at a variable (market) rate.

The Company uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value of certain financial assets and financial liabilities into three broad levels. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company classified its financial assets and financial liabilities as Level 2. The financial assets and liabilities were measured using quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheet (in thousands):

	Balance atMarch 31,2012		Quoted prices inactive markets(Level 1)		Significant otherobservable inputs(Level 2)
Financial instruments classified as assets
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	225		—	$	225
Financial instruments classified as liabilities
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	2,563		—	$	2,563
	Balance atDecember 31,2011		Quoted prices inactive markets(Level 1)		Significant otherobservable inputs(Level 2)
Financial instruments classified as assets
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	110		—	$	110
Financial instruments classified as liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	277		—	$	277
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	2,140		—	$	2,140

The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheet (in thousands):


	Balance at June 30, 2012		Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)
Financial instruments classified as assets
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	2,942		—	$	2,942

Financial instruments classified as liabilities
Foreign currency forward contracts		2,894		—		2,894

	Balance at December 31, 2011		Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)
Financial instruments classified as assets
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	110		—	$	110

Financial instruments classified as liabilities
Interest rate swaps		277		—		277
Foreign currency forward contracts		2,140		—		2,140

2. Restructuring

Restructuring charges were $2.4.6 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. ~~Reserve~~Restructuring reserve activity for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 for continuing operations by division is as ~~follows~~ ~~(in thousands)~~follows:

EMEA Activity

The Company continues to optimize the operating and financial structure of its EMEA division. A main strategic component of this plan focuses on consolidating current warehouse facilities and creating strategically located hubs or “Centers of Excellence” (supply chain delivery centers) to streamline operations. The EMEA region has four Centers of Excellence located in Sweden, Slovakia, Germany and South Africa. Additionally, the Company continues to centralize and migrate many business support (or back office) functions in the EMEA division into a shared services center. AsAll ~~of the end of 2011, all~~ Europe entities have migrated into the shared services center, and the Company is developing a plan to migrate the Middle East and South Africa operations. ~~Reserve~~Restructuring reserve activity for the plan described above for the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

	EmployeeTerminations			LeaseTermination Costs			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011*	$	329		$	113		$	442
2012 Activity:
Restructuring charge		35			19			54
Cash usage		(346	)		(133	)		(479	)
Foreign currency translation		6			1			7
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	24		$	—		$	24

* The restructuring reserve for EMEA as of December 31, 2011 excludes a $0.4 million reserve for severance charges incurred in 2009 for the departure of the Company’s President of the EMEA division that is not part of the consolidation and rationalization plan described above. Total restructuring costs for the Company’s centralization and consolidation of services in its EMEA division that began in 2009 were $6.5 million as of March 31, 2012.

Restructuring charges for the EMEA division were $0.1 million for three months ended March 31, 2012, which includes severance charges in our EMEA division as part of a separate restructuring plan.

Americas Activity

On May 17, 2011 the Company announced its plan to relocate its Touchstone Wireless operations from Bristol, Tennessee and consolidate the operations into its existing facilities in Fort Worth, Texas and Plainfield, Indiana. The relocation of operations and final activities to shut down the facility occurred during the third and fourth quarters of 2011. Final retention bonuses will be paid during the second quarter of 2012. The Company also closed an office of the former Touchstone Wireless operations in Hatfield, Pennsylvania during the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company has accrued severance and retention bonuses related to the closing. Total restructuring costs for this plan were $5.4 million as of March 31, 2012.

In March 2012, the Americas division announced a plan to reduce its workforce in response to the current economic conditions in the wireless industry. Additionally, in February 2012, the Company signed a letter of intent to sell its facility in Reno, Nevada. The sale is subject to due diligence, however, the transaction is expected to close in the second or third quarter of 2012. Reserve activity for the Americas division for the three months ended March 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

	EmployeeTerminations			LeaseTerminationCosts			AssetImpairmentCharges			Other			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011*	$	942		$	899		$	—		$	29		$	1,870
2012 Activity:
Restructuring charge		768			—			842			599			2,209
Cash usage		(884	)		(130	)		—			(29	)		(1,043	)
Non-cash usage		—			—			(842	)		(599	)		(1,441	)
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	826		$	769		$	—		$	—		$	1,595

* The restructuring reserve for the Americas division as of December 31, 2011 does not include a $0.2 million restructuring reserve acquired in the purchase of Touchstone Wireless.


	Employee Terminations			Lease Termination Costs			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	329		$	113		$	442

Activity for first quarter 2012:
Restructuring charge		35			19			54
Cash usage		(346	)		(133	)		(479	)
Foreign currency translation		6			1			7

Balance at March 31, 2012	$	24		$	—		$	24

Activity for second quarter 2012:
Restructuring charge		680			—			680
Cash usage		(258	)		—			(258	)
Foreign currency translation		6			—			6

Balance at June 30, 2012*	$	452		$	—		$	452

~~Restructuring~~* ~~charges~~The restructuring reserve for ~~the~~EMEA ~~Americas~~as ~~division~~of ~~were~~June 30, 2012 excludes a $20.21 million reserve for severance charges incurred in 2009 for the ~~three~~departure ~~months~~of ~~ended~~the ~~March 31, 2012.~~Company’s ~~The~~President ~~restructuring~~of ~~charges~~the ~~consist~~EMEA division that is not part of the ~~following:~~consolidation and rationalization plan described above.

-Restructuring charges for the EMEA division were $10.47 million offor ~~restructuring~~six ~~charges~~months toended ~~write~~June 30, ~~down~~2012, ~~the~~which ~~carrying~~includes ~~value~~severance charges in our EMEA division as part of a separate restructuring plan. Total restructuring costs for the Company’s ~~facility~~centralization inand ~~Reno,~~consolidation ~~Nevada~~of toservices ~~the~~in ~~fair~~its ~~value~~EMEA asdivision ~~estimated~~that bybegan ~~the~~in ~~anticipated~~2009 ~~sales~~were ~~price,~~$7.0 ~~less~~million ~~the~~as ~~costs~~of toJune 30, ~~sell~~2012.

~~- $0.8 million of restructuring charges relate to severance from the workforce reduction in the~~ Americas ~~division~~Activity

On May 17, 2011 the Company announced its plan to relocate its Touchstone Wireless operations from Bristol, Tennessee and consolidate the operations into its existing facilities in Fort Worth, Texas and Plainfield, Indiana. The relocation of operations and final activities to shut down the facility occurred during the third and fourth quarters of 2011. The Company also closed an office of the former Touchstone Wireless operations in Hatfield, Pennsylvania during the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company has accrued severance and retention bonuses related to the closing. Total restructuring costs for this plan were $5.2 million as of June 30, 2012.

In February 2012, the Company signed a letter of intent to sell its facility in Reno, Nevada. The sale is subject to due diligence, however, the transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2012. Additionally, in March 2012, the Americas division announced a plan to reduce its workforce in response to the current economic conditions in the wireless industry. Restructuring reserve activity for the Americas division for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):


	Employee Terminations			Lease Termination Costs			Asset Impairment Charges			Other			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	942		$	899		$	—		$	29		$	1,870

Activity for first quarter 2012:
Restructuring charge		768			—			842			599			2,209
Cash usage		(884	)		(130	)		—			(29	)		(1,043	)
Non-cash usage		—			—			(842	)		(599	)		(1,441	)

Balance at March 31, 2012	$	826		$	769		$	—		$	—		$	1,595

Activity for second quarter 2012:
Restructuring charge		80			—			—			164			244
Cash usage		(286	)		(769	)		—			(164	)		(1,219	)
Non-cash usage		—			—			—			—			—

Balance at June 30, 2012*	$	620		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	620

*	The restructuring reserve for the Americas division as of June 30, 2012 does not include a $0.1 million restructuring reserve acquired in the purchase of Touchstone Wireless.

Restructuring charges for the Americas division were $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The restructuring charges consist of the following:

•

$1.4 million of restructuring charges to write down the carrying value of the Company’s facility in Reno, Nevada to the fair value as estimated by the anticipated sales price, less the costs to sell

•

$0.2 million of restructuring charges related to the operating costs of the Company’s facility in Reno

•

$0.8 million of restructuring charges relate to severance from the workforce reduction in the Americas division

Corporate Activity

The Corporate division incurred $01.24 million of restructuring charges ~~during~~for the ~~three~~six ~~month~~months ~~period~~ ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. In the second quarter of 2012, the Company incurred $1.3 million of restructuring expense related to severance and accelerated non-cash stock based compensation related to the elimination of ~~certain~~the ~~positions~~Company’s global Chief Information Officer position. The elimination of this position is a result of the Company reorganizing its information technology structure from a global approach to a regional approach.

Continued global initiatives to centralize and consolidate operations could result in future reductions in workforce and early lease terminations that would result in additional restructuring charges.

3. Acquisitions and Investments

On January 10, 2012 the Company completed, through its subsidiary Brightpoint Malaysia, the formation of a joint venture with STC Group in Malaysia. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company contributed approximately $6.1 million in cash to Brightpoint Malaysia for 100% of the ownership interests. Concurrently, STC contributed finite lived intangible assets valued at $19.9 million in exchange for a 40% ownership in Brightpoint Malaysia and contingent earnout consideration. In addition, Brightpoint Malaysia purchased inventory and fixed assets for approximately $3.3 million.

The contingent cash earnout payments are based on certain operating performance measures which may be payable for up to five ~~fiscal~~ years after the acquisition. The total earnout payments will in no event exceed approximately $11.50 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 (35.1 million Malaysian Ringgits). The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration ~~as of the acquisition date~~ was approximately $76.29 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 (approximately 21.9 million Malaysian Ringgits).

~~The~~11 contributed finite lived intangible assets consist of customer relationships, vendor relationships and trade names. The preparation of the valuation of finite lived intangible assets required the use of significant assumptions and estimates. Critical estimates included, but were not limited to, future expected cash flows and the applicable discount rates as of the date of the acquisition, customer and vendor attrition rates and royalty rates for trade names. These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable as of the date of transaction date, however, actual results may differ from these estimates. The finite-lived intangible assets have useful lives ranging from 5 to 10 years and are being amortized over an accelerated method based on the projected cash flows used for valuation purposes. As a result of applying this accelerated method of amortization, approximately 76% of the original value assigned to these assets will be amortized within the first five years after the transaction date. The Company believes these cash flows are most reflective of the pattern in which the economic benefit of the finite-lived intangible assets will be consumed.

The ~~allocation~~contributed finite lived intangible assets consist of ~~the~~customer ~~value~~relationships, vendor relationships and trade names. The preparation of the valuation of finite lived intangible assets isrequired ~~based~~the onuse aof ~~preliminary~~significant ~~valuation~~assumptions and ~~subject~~estimates. Critical estimates included, but were not limited to, ~~finalization~~future expected cash flows and the applicable discount rates as of the date of the acquisition, customer and vendor attrition rates and royalty rates for trade names. ~~Results~~These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable as of ~~operations~~the ~~related~~date of transaction date, however, actual results may differ from these estimates. The finite-lived intangible assets have useful lives ranging from 5 to ~~this~~10 ~~acquisition~~years and are ~~consolidated~~being inamortized ~~our~~using ~~Consolidated~~an accelerated method based on the projected cash flows used for valuation purposes. As a result ~~Statement~~of applying this accelerated method of ~~Operations~~amortization, ~~beginning~~approximately in76% of the original value assigned to these assets will be amortized within the first ~~quarter~~five years after the transaction date. The Company believes these cash flows are most reflective of ~~2012~~the ~~with~~pattern in which the ~~40%~~economic ~~non-controlling~~benefit ~~interest~~of ~~eliminated~~the ~~from~~finite-lived ~~reported~~intangible ~~income~~assets ~~from~~will ~~continuing~~be ~~operations~~consumed.

InResults ~~April~~of ~~2011,~~operations ~~the~~related ~~Company~~to ~~completed an investment in the U.S. based company Intcomex. Intcomex is a leading IT distributor focused solely on the Latin America and the Caribbean markets. Under~~ this ~~agreement,~~acquisition ~~the~~are ~~Company~~consolidated ~~invested~~in ~~cash~~our ofConsolidated ~~$13.0~~Statement ~~million and contributed its Colombia and Guatemala operations and certain components~~ of ~~its~~Operations ~~other~~beginning ~~Latin America operations, excluding certain legacy business~~ in ~~Puerto Rico, in exchange for an approximate 23% share of~~ the ~~outstanding~~first ~~common~~quarter ~~stock~~ of ~~Intcomex.~~2012 ~~The~~with ~~Company~~the ~~also~~40% ~~holds~~non-controlling ainterest ~~seat~~eliminated onfrom ~~the~~reported ~~Intcomex~~income ~~Board~~from ofcontinuing ~~Directors~~operations. ~~The investment is an equity method investment, and the Company’s share of earnings (losses) in~~

10In April 2011, the Company completed an investment in the U.S. based company Intcomex. Intcomex is a leading IT distributor focused solely on the Latin America and the Caribbean markets. Under this agreement, the Company invested cash of $13.0 million and contributed its Colombia and Guatemala operations and certain components of its other Latin America operations, excluding certain legacy business in Puerto Rico, in exchange for an approximate 23% share of the outstanding common stock of Intcomex. The investment is an equity method investment, and the Company’s share of earnings (losses) in Intcomex is included in “other expense (income)” in the consolidated statement of operations three months in arrears in order to meet the Company’s reporting deadlines. Earnings, net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 included $1.0 million and $1.7 million of income from this investment. The investment is included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in Intcomex is greater than 23% of the book value of Intcomex’s equity. This difference is allocated to an unrecorded intangible asset to reflect the unique customers and geographic footprint of the Intcomex operations. The difference is being amortized over seven years, which reduces the Company’s share of the income reported by Intcomex. See Note 1 for more information on the investment in Intcomex.

Intcomex is included in “other expense (income)” in the consolidated statement of operations three months in arrears in order to meet the Company’s reporting deadlines. Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 included $0.7 million of income from this investment. The investment is included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in Intcomex is greater than 23% of the book value of Intcomex’s equity. This difference is allocated to an unrecorded intangible asset to reflect the unique customers and geographic footprint of the Intcomex operations. The difference is being amortized over seven years, which reduces the Company’s share of the income reported by Intcomex.

On March 23, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of C2O Mobile Pte. Ltd. and C2O Corporation Pte. Ltd. (C2O) for $0.5 million plus the value of inventory and certain fixed assets as of the closing date. In addition, the Company agreed to contingent cash earnout payments based upon certain operating performance measures, which may be payable on the first, second, and third anniversary of closing. The total earnout payments, including the $0.5 million initial payment, cannot exceed $1.7 million and an appropriate amount has been included in the purchase price allocation.

4. Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $2.67 million ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2012~~ and ~~2011~~$5.3 ~~Income~~million ~~tax expense~~ for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~included~~compared ato $0.65 million ~~charge~~and ~~for~~$3.1 amillion ~~discrete~~for ~~tax~~the ~~adjustment~~three inand asix ~~foreign~~months ~~jurisdiction~~ended June 30, 2011. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012 included a $01.4 9 million ~~of income tax benefit related to the reversal of~~ valuation ~~allowances~~allowance on ~~certain tax assets and~~ foreign tax credits that are no longer expected to be utilized in the U.S. ~~Excluding~~and a ~~the~~$0.5 ~~charge~~million invaluation ~~2012~~allowance ~~and~~in ~~the~~Denmark ~~benefit~~as ina ~~2011,~~result ~~the~~of ~~effective~~a ~~income~~change in tax ~~rates~~law ~~for~~that limits the ~~three~~amount ~~months~~of ~~ended~~net ~~March 31,~~operating ~~2012~~loss ~~and~~carryforward ~~2011~~that ~~were~~can ~~34.7%~~be ~~and~~utilized ~~28.2%.~~to ~~The~~offset ~~higher~~taxable ~~adjusted effective~~ income. Income tax ~~rate~~expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 also ~~was~~included ~~primarily due to~~ a ~~shift~~$0.6 inmillion ~~geographic~~charge ~~mix~~for ~~of income,~~ a ~~higher~~discrete ~~2012 expected income~~ tax ~~rate~~adjustment ~~on certain income generated~~ in a foreign jurisdiction ~~as well as taxable losses in certain entities for which the Company is not recording an income tax benefit~~.

Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 included $2.0 million of income tax benefit related to the reversal of valuation allowances on foreign tax credits that were expected to be utilized as a result of restructuring the legal ownership of certain European subsidiaries and $0.8 million of income tax benefit related to the reversal of valuation allowances on certain foreign net operating loss tax assets that were expected to be utilized.

Excluding the items mentioned above, the effective income tax rates were (14.5%) and 60.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 26.8% and 27.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.The negative adjusted effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and the higher adjusted effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were primarily due to losses in certain entities for which the Company is not recording an income tax benefit.

The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, certain of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examinations by taxing authorities throughout the world. In addition, certain state, federal and foreign tax returns are under examination by various regulatory authorities.

5. Discontinued Operations

Details of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes (1)	$	(~~268~~94	)	$	~~1,830~~(860	)	$	(362	)	$	970
Income tax expense (benefit)		—			—
Income tax benefit		—			—			—			—
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(~~268~~94	)	$	~~1,830~~(860	)	$	(362	)	$	970
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations (2)		(280	)		(541	)
Gain (loss) on disposal from discontinued operations (2)		272			(232	)		(8	)		(773	)
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$	~~(548~~178	)	$	(1,~~289~~092	)	$	(370	)	$	197

(1) Gain (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 primarily relates to the liquidation of our discontinued France operation. We abandoned our France operation in the third quarter of 2009.

(2) ~~Loss~~Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 primarily relates to cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments.

6. Borrowings

InAt ~~September~~June 30, ~~2011~~2012, the Company ~~entered~~and ~~into the fifth amendment to~~ its ~~Credit~~subsidiaries ~~Agreement~~were ~~dated~~in ~~February 16,~~compliance ~~2007.~~with ~~The fifth amendment: (i) increased~~ the ~~total~~covenants ~~borrowing~~of ~~capacity~~their tocredit ~~$500~~agreements. ~~million;~~Interest ~~(ii) extended~~expense ~~the~~includes ~~maturity date until September 2016; (iii) allowed investments in majority-owned joint ventures up to $30 million in the aggregate; (iv) reduced the~~ interest ~~rate~~on tooutstanding ~~2.25% over LIBOR~~debt, orcharges ~~approximately 2.50%; and (v) increased the allowance~~ for ~~factored~~accounts receivable ~~receivables~~factoring ~~in operations outside of the U.S. to $250 million. Consistent with the prior Credit Agreement~~programs, ~~the~~fees ~~amended agreement~~paid ~~contained~~for ~~covenants~~unused ~~requiring~~capacity aon ~~maximum~~credit ~~leverage~~lines ~~ratio below 3.0~~ and aamortization ~~fixed~~of ~~charge~~deferred ~~coverage~~financing ~~ratio above 2~~fees.0.

AtThe ~~March 31,~~table below ~~2012,~~summarizes the ~~Company~~borrowing ~~and~~capacity ~~its~~that ~~subsidiaries~~was ~~were~~available into ~~compliance with~~ the ~~covenants~~Company as of ~~their credit agreements. Interest expense includes interest on outstanding debt~~June 30, ~~charges~~2012 ~~for~~(in ~~accounts~~thousands): ~~receivable factoring programs, fees paid for unused capacity on credit lines and amortization of deferred financing fees.~~

The table below summarizes the borrowing capacity that was available to the Company as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):


	Gross Availability		Outstanding		Letters of Credit & Guarantees		Net Availability
Global Credit Facility	$	500,000	$	178,253	$	1,167	$	320,580
Other		56,334		16,283		—		40,051

Total	$	556,334	$	194,536	$	1,167	$	360,631

	GrossAvailability		Outstanding		Letters of Credit &Guarantees		NetAvailability
Global Credit Facility	$	500,000	$	284,896	$	1,261	$	213,843
Other		56,672		11,152		—		45,520
Total	$	556,672	$	296,048	$	1,261	$	259,363

The Company has $5.5 million of guarantees and $0.4 million of short-term borrowings that do not impact net availability under the Credit Agreement. The Company’s ability to borrow amounts available is based primarily on a leverage ratio test, measured quarterly as total funded indebtedness over EBITDA adjusted, as defined in the credit agreement. Decreases in adjusted EBITDA could limit the Company’s availability to borrow additional funds to adequately finance operations and expansion strategies.

~~The~~On July 12, 2012, the Company ~~has~~entered $3into the sixth amendment to its Credit Agreement dated February 16, 2007.7 ~~million~~The ofamendment ~~guarantees~~was entered into in conjunction with the pending merger with Ingram Micro and it waives a clause in the ‘Change in Control’ definition set forth in the agreement so that dothe Company will not ~~impact~~default ~~our~~on ~~net~~the ~~availability~~Credit ~~under~~Agreement ~~our~~30 ~~Credit~~days after the signing of the Merger Agreement.

7. Guarantees

Guarantees are recorded at fair value and disclosed, even when the likelihood of making any payments under such guarantees is remote.

The Company has issued certain guarantees on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates with regard to lines of credit. The nature of these guarantees and the amounts outstanding are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

8. Operating Segments

The Company has ~~operation~~operations centers and/or sales offices in various countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, India, ~~Vietnam,~~ Malaysia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, ~~and~~ the United States, and Vietnam. All of the Company’s operating entities generate revenue from the provision of logistic services and/or the distribution of wireless devices and accessories. The Company identifies its reportable segments based on management responsibility of its three geographic divisions: the Americas, Asia-Pacific, and EMEA. The Company’s operating components have been aggregated into these three geographic reporting segments.

12The Company evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to these segments based on income from continuing operations before income taxes (excluding corporate selling, general and administrative expenses and other unallocated expenses). A summary of the Company’s continuing operations by segment is presented below (in thousands) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

~~The~~14 Company evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to these segments based on income from continuing operations before income taxes (excluding corporate selling, general and administrative expenses and other unallocated expenses). A summary of the Company’s continuing operations by segment is presented below (in thousands) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Americas		Asia-Pacific		EMEA			Corporate andreconciling Items			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012:	Americas		Asia-Pacific		EMEA			Corporate andReconcilingItems			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012:
Distribution revenue	$	93,427	$	417,972	$	629,196		$	—		$	1,140,595
Distribution revenue	$	131,459	$	474,184	$	628,701		$	—		$	1,234,344
Logistic services revenue		93,402		10,122		22,200			—			125,724
Logistic services revenue		101,456		11,095		23,193			—			135,744
Total revenue from external customers	$	186,829	$	428,094	$	651,396		$	—		$	1,266,319
Total revenue from external customers	$	232,915	$	485,279	$	651,894		$	—		$	1,370,088
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	9,028	$	5,241	$	(4,157)		$	(12,075)		$	(1,963)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	10,662	$	5,420	$	(1,190	)	$	(9,221	)	$	5,671
Depreciation and amortization		5,666		1,809		5,003			388			12,866
Depreciation and amortization		5,726		1,846		5,094			420			13,086
Capital expenditures		1,262		815		1,759			(201	)		3,635
Capital expenditures		3,850		563		806			278			5,497
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011:
Distribution revenue	$	159,824	$	427,089	$	505,072		$	—		$	1,091,985
Distribution revenue	$	128,467	$	370,906	$	485,280		$	—		$	984,653
Logistic services revenue		101,117		10,672		31,140			—			142,929
Logistic services revenue		95,615		11,363		23,249			—			130,227
Total revenue from external customers	$	260,941	$	437,761	$	536,212		$	—		$	1,234,914
Total revenue from external customers	$	224,082	$	382,269	$	508,529		$	—		$	1,114,880
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	17,141	$	8,938	$	3,115		$	(16,895	)	$	12,299
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	16,571	$	4,655	$	(879	)	$	(9,781	)	$	10,566
Depreciation and amortization		5,119		670		5,274			447			11,510
Depreciation and amortization		5,378		607		4,838			457			11,280
Capital expenditures		8,412		668		5,129			686			14,895
Capital expenditures		15,778		284		4,328			2,440			22,830
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012:
Distribution revenue	$	224,885	$	892,156	$	1,257,898		$	—		$	2,374,939
Logistic services revenue		194,858		21,217		45,392			—			261,467
Total revenue from external customers	$	419,743	$	913,373	$	1,303,290		$	—		$	2,636,406
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	19,690	$	10,661	$	(5,347	)	$	(21,296	)	$	3,708
Depreciation and amortization		11,392		3,656		10,097			808			25,953
Capital expenditures		5,160		1,378		2,566			28			9,132
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011:
Distribution revenue	$	288,290	$	797,994	$	990,354		$	—		$	2,076,638
Logistic services revenue		196,732		22,034		54,390			—			273,156
Total revenue from external customers	$	485,022	$	820,028	$	1,044,744		$	—		$	2,349,794
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	33,712	$	13,593	$	2,236		$	(26,676	)	$	22,865
Depreciation and amortization		10,497		1,277		10,112			903			22,789
Capital expenditures		24,190		952		9,457			3,126			37,725

Additional segment information is as follows (in thousands):

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Total segment assets:	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
Total segment assets:
Americas	$	390,565	$	447,349
Americas	$	439,253	$	447,349
Asia-Pacific		322,274		362,679
Asia-Pacific		366,873		362,679
EMEA		620,770		678,746
EMEA		649,586		678,746
Corporate		11,777		18,137
Corporate		16,360		18,137
	$	1,345,386	$	1,506,911
	$	1,472,072	$	1,506,911

9. Accounts Receivable Factoring

The Company has agreements with unrelated third-parties for the factoring of specific accounts receivable in Germany and Spain to reduce the amount of ~~working~~ capital required to fund such receivables. ~~The~~ The Company’s Credit Agreement permits the factoring of up to $250 million of receivables in operations outside of the U.S. The factoring of accounts receivable under these agreements are accounted for as a sale in accordance with ASC 860. ~~Proceeds~~ Proceeds on the transfer reflect the face value of the account less a discount. The discount is recorded as a charge in “Interest, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period of the sale.

~~Net~~15 funds received reduced accounts receivable outstanding while increasing cash. The Company is the collection agent on behalf of the third party for the arrangements in Spain and Germany. However, the Company has no significant retained interests or servicing liabilities related to the accounts receivable that have been sold in either Germany or Spain. The Company has obtained credit insurance from a third party on the majority of the factored accounts receivable to mitigate credit risk and the credit insurance has been assigned to the factor. The risk of loss is limited to factored accounts receivable not covered by credit insurance, which is immaterial.

AtNet ~~March 31,~~funds ~~2012~~received reduced accounts receivable outstanding, ~~the~~while increasing cash. The Company ~~had~~is ~~sold~~the collection ~~$33.7~~agent ~~million~~on behalf of ~~accounts~~the ~~receivable~~third ~~pursuant~~party tofor ~~these~~the ~~agreements,~~arrangements ~~which represents~~in ~~the~~Spain ~~face~~and ~~amount~~Germany. ofHowever, ~~total~~the ~~outstanding~~Company ~~receivables~~has atno ~~those~~significant ~~dates.~~retained Atinterests ~~March 31,~~or ~~2011~~servicing liabilities related to the ~~Company~~accounts ~~had~~receivable that have been sold ~~$40~~in either Germany or Spain.5 ~~million~~The Company has obtained credit insurance from a third party on the majority of the factored accounts receivable ~~under~~to ~~these~~mitigate ~~agreements.~~credit ~~Fees~~risk ~~paid~~and ~~pursuant~~the tocredit ~~these~~insurance ~~agreements~~has ~~were~~been ~~$0.5~~assigned ~~million~~to ~~and~~the $0factor.2 The risk of loss is limited to factored ~~million~~accounts ~~for~~receivable ~~the~~not ~~three~~covered ~~months~~by ~~ended~~credit ~~March 31~~insurance, ~~2012~~which ~~and~~is ~~2011~~immaterial.

13At June 30, 2012, the Company had sold $49.0 million of accounts receivable pursuant to these agreements, which represents the face amount of total outstanding receivables at those dates. At June 30, 2011 the Company had sold $45.6 million of accounts receivable under these agreements. Fees paid pursuant to these agreements were $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and were $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

10. Legal Proceedings and Contingencies

LN Eurocom

On September 11, 2008, LN Eurocom (“LNE”) filed a lawsuit in the City Court of Frederiksberg, Denmark against Brightpoint Smartphone A/S and Brightpoint International A/S, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (collectively, “Smartphone”). The lawsuit alleges that Smartphone breached a contract relating to call center services performed or to be performed by LNE. Smartphone disputes this claim and intends to vigorously defend this matter. Final pleadings in the matter were entered and legal proceedings concluded in September 2011. On November 25, 2011, the court entered a judgment against Smartphone for approximately 1.6 million EUR (approximately $2.10 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012) plus interest accruing from the contract termination date, legal fees and other costs aggregating 1.2 million EUR (approximately $1.65 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012), which are accrued as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012. The Company has appealed the court’s ruling and will continue to vigorously defend the case; however, interest will continue to accrue until the matter is resolved. The parties are required to submit their claims to the Danish High Court in September 2012.

Norwegian tax authorities

Dangaard Telecom’s subsidiary, Dangaard Telecom Norway AS Group, received notice from the Norwegian tax authorities regarding tax claims in connection with certain capital gains. The Norwegian tax authorities claimed $2.7 million, which was paid by Dangaard Telecom Norway AS Group. Dangaard Telecom Norway AS Group disputed this claim; however, the Norwegian Tax Authorities ruled against Dangaard Telecom Norway AS in April 2008. On February 3, 2009, the Norwegian Tax Authorities determined that the capital gains were within Brightpoint Norway’s core business and, therefore, Brightpoint Norway was responsible for tax on the gain in the amount of 8.1 million NOK (approximately $1.4 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012). On February 19, 2010, the magistrate hearing the appeal ruled in favor of the Norwegian Tax Authorities. Brightpoint Norway appealed the decision and on March 4, 2011, the appeal court ruled in favor of the Norwegian Tax Authorities. On April 4, 2011, Brightpoint Norway filed a request with the appeal court for the case to be heard by the Norway Supreme Court. On May 11, 2011, the request was denied and therefore, the decision by the appeal court on March 4, 2011 is final. The former shareholders of Dangaard Telecom agreed to indemnify Dangaard Holding with respect to 80% of this claim when Dangaard Holding acquired Dangaard Telecom, and Dangaard Holding agreed in the purchase agreement with the Company to transfer and assign these indemnification rights to the Company (or enforce them on the Company’s behalf if such transfer or assignment is not permitted). The Company is currently seeking recovery for any amounts it may be entitled under indemnity rights with respect to this claim.

German tax authorities

Dangaard Telecom’s subsidiary, Dangaard Telecom Germany Holding GmbH, received notice from the German tax authorities regarding tax claims in connection with the deductibility of certain stock adjustments and various fees during the period 1998 to 2002. Dangaard Telecom Germany Holding GmbH agreed to pay part of the claim, resulting in a disputed amount of $1.8 million. Although the former shareholders of Dangaard Telecom are obliged to indemnify Dangaard Holding with respect to any such tax claims, due to the claim’s limited size it will be below an agreed upon threshold and the indemnification would not be activated by this claim if no other claims for indemnification have been or are asserted. ~~Dangaard~~In ~~Telecom~~the ~~Germany~~second ~~Holding~~fiscal ~~GmbH~~quarter ~~and~~of ~~the~~2012, ~~German~~we ~~tax~~received ~~authorities~~the ~~are~~final inassessment ~~the process~~ of ~~finalizing~~approximately a85,000 ~~settlement~~EUR comprised of ~~the~~taxes ~~matter~~ and ainterest. ~~final~~The ~~tax~~majority ~~assessment~~of isthis ~~anticipated~~assessment towas bepaid ~~received~~in ~~during~~ the second fiscal quarter of 2012~~. The~~ ~~final~~with ~~assessment~~the remainder isto ~~not~~be ~~anticipated~~paid toin ~~result~~the inthird afiscal ~~material~~quarter ~~tax~~of ~~adjustment~~2012.

1416

Pending Merger Litigation

BrightPoint has received notice of the filing of two putative class action complaints commenced in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. In the first action, the plaintiff sued BrightPoint, its directors, Ingram Micro and Merger Sub for alleged violations of Sections 14 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, based on the alleged omission of certain information contained in the preliminary proxy statement. In the second action, two plaintiffs sued BrightPoint and its directors alleging the same federal securities claims and asserting that BrightPoint’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to conduct a fair process for the sale of BrightPoint and accepting a purchase price that was too low. These plaintiffs also allege that BrightPoint aided and abetted the directors’ purported breaches of their fiduciary duties. The plaintiffs in both putative class actions seek, among other things, monetary damages, injunctive relief (including enjoining the merger), and attorneys’ and other fees and expenses. The Company has also received a letter on behalf of a BrightPoint shareholder that requests BrightPoint incorporate certain disclosures relating to the Merger into the definitive proxy statement.

11. Subsequent Events

Effective July 1, 2012, BrightPoint entered into a three-year contract renewal with a logistic services customer. Based on the terms of the agreement, BrightPoint will pay the customer a one-time fee of $3.0 million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

OVERVIEW AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis we review our estimates and assumptions. Our estimates were based on our historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates but we do not believe such differences will materially affect our financial position or results of operations. Our critical accounting estimates, the estimates we believe are most important to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments are outlined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and have not changed significantly. Certain statements made in this report may contain forward-looking statements. For a description of risks and uncertainties relating to such forward-looking statements, see the cautionary statements contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

BrightPoint is a global leader in providing device lifecycle services to the wireless ~~industry~~and high-tech industries. We provide customized logistic services including demand planning, procurement, inventory management, software loading, kitting and customized packaging, fulfillment, credit services, receivables management, call center services, activation services, website hosting, e-fulfillment solutions, repair, refurbish and recycle services, reverse logistics, transportation management and other services within the global wireless ~~industry~~and high-tech industries. Our customers include mobile network operators, mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs), resellers, retailers and wireless equipment manufacturers. We provide value-added distribution channel management and other supply chain solutions for wireless products manufactured by companies such as Apple, HTC, Huawei, Kyocera, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Research in Motion, Samsung, Sony, and ZTE. We have operations centers and/or sales offices in 2627 countries and a presence in 13 Latin American countries through our investment in Intcomex, Inc. (Intcomex).

Consolidated revenue was $1.43 billion and ~~wireless devices handled were 29.~~$2 ~~million~~.6 billion for the three and six months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012, anincreases ~~increase~~ of 23 3% and 712% compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior year. The increase ~~was~~in ~~primarily~~revenue was driven by ~~growth~~an increase in wireless devices sold through our distribution business ~~due~~in to the Asia-Pacific and EMEA regions due to increased demand for smartphones. This increase is partially offset with unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations and ~~increased~~a decrease in wireless devices sold inthrough our ~~Southeast~~North ~~Asia~~America ~~operations~~distribution ~~and our~~business ~~EMEA~~as ~~division~~a result of increased competition. Foreign currency fluctuations had an unfavorable impact on revenue of $2377.8 million and $105.4 million for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~compared to a favorable impact of $13~~.2 ~~million in the same period in the prior year.~~

On ~~January~~June 1029, 2012, weBrightpoint, ~~successfully~~Inc., ~~completed~~Ingram ~~the~~Micro ~~formation~~Inc., of(Ingram aMicro) ~~joint~~and ~~venture~~Beacon inSub, ~~Malaysia~~Inc., ~~with~~(Merger ~~STC~~Sub), ~~Partners~~entered ~~Sdn.~~into ~~Bhd.~~an Agreement and Plan of Merger (~~“STC”~~the Merger Agreement). Byproviding for the merger ~~finalizing~~of Merger Sub with and into the ~~transaction~~Company (the Merger), ~~BrightPoint~~with ~~extended~~the ~~its~~Company ~~presence~~surviving inthe ~~Asia~~Merger as a wholly-~~Pacific~~owned tosubsidiary ~~the~~of ~~Malaysian~~Ingram ~~market~~Micro. Under the terms of the ~~agreement~~Merger Agreement, weat ~~contributed~~the ~~approximately~~ effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock, par value $60.101 ~~million~~per inshare, ~~cash~~of Brightpoint, Inc. issued and outstanding immediately prior to ~~Brightpoint~~the ~~Malaysia~~effective ~~for~~time, ~~100%~~will ofbe converted into the ~~ownership interests~~right to receive $9.00 ~~Concurrently~~in cash, ~~STC~~excluding ~~contributed~~treasury ~~finite~~shares ~~lived~~and ~~intangible~~shares ~~assets~~held ~~valued~~by any direct or indirect subsidiary of Ingram Micro (other than Merger Sub). The Merger Agreement also provides that at the effective time, each outstanding restricted stock unit, restricted stock award and restricted share of common stock granted under any company stock plan will be converted into the right to receive $~~19.~~9.00 ~~million~~ in ~~exchange~~cash. ~~for~~The atotal ~~40%~~amount ~~ownership~~expected to be paid in ~~Brightpoint~~the ~~Malaysia~~Merger ~~and~~with ~~contingent~~respect ~~earnout~~to ~~consideration.~~our Inoutstanding ~~addition~~common stock and outstanding equity awards, ~~Brightpoint~~including ~~Malaysia~~outstanding ~~purchased~~debt ~~inventory~~(net ~~and fixed~~of ~~assets~~cash) ~~for~~as of June 30, 2012 of approximately $~~3.3~~165 million, is approximately $820 million.

~~In February 2012~~BrightPoint, weIngram ~~announced~~Micro ~~that~~and ~~our~~Merger ~~North~~Sub ~~America~~have ~~operation~~made ~~was~~customary ~~notified~~representations and ~~that~~warranties ~~one~~in ofthe ~~its logistic~~Merger ~~services~~Agreement, ~~customers~~and ~~will~~each ~~begin~~has ~~transitioning~~agreed to ause ~~different~~its ~~service~~reasonable ~~provider~~best inefforts ~~April,~~to ~~2012~~consummate the Merger. We ~~handled~~have ~~6.8 million~~also ~~wireless~~agreed ~~devices~~to invarious ~~2011~~covenants onin ~~behalf~~the ofMerger ~~this~~Agreement, ~~customer~~including, ~~which~~among ~~represented~~others, 8%(i) to ofconduct ~~total~~business ~~logistic~~in ~~services wireless devices~~all ~~handled~~material respects in ~~2011.~~the ~~The~~ordinary ~~transition~~course ofconsistent ~~this~~with ~~customer~~past ispractice ~~not~~during ~~expected~~the toperiod ~~have~~between athe ~~material~~execution ~~impact~~of onthe ~~revenue~~Merger ~~but~~Agreement ~~will~~and ~~have~~the aneffective ~~adverse~~time ~~impact~~of onthe ~~gross~~Merger ~~profit,~~and ~~operating~~(ii) to ~~income,~~cause ~~and~~a ~~net~~special ~~income.~~meeting Weof ~~handled~~our ~~approximately~~shareholders ~~1.9 million~~to ~~devices~~be inheld ~~the first~~to ~~quarter~~consider ofthe ~~2012~~approval ~~on behalf~~ of ~~this~~the ~~customer~~Merger Agreement.

1518

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for Ingram Micro and us including receipt by BrightPoint of a superior proposal. In connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including our entry into an agreement under an alternative acquisition proposal, we are required to pay the Ingram Micro a termination fee equal to $26.0 million. In addition, subject to certain limitations, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not consummated by March 31, 2013. Our merger related costs associated with the pending acquisition by Ingram Micro were $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2012 and consisted of professional and legal fees.

Concurrent with the execution of the Merger Agreement, we amended the Purchase Agreement with Intcomex dated March 16, 2011, and the Shareholders Agreement of Intcomex dated April 19, 2011, to eliminate the non-competition covenants applicable to us. In conjunction with the amendments, we paid Intcomex $5.0 million and our director resigned from Intcomex’s board of directors. This expense is included in “merger and acquisition expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We also entered into an option agreement that grants Intcomex a five-year option, effective upon closing of the Merger, to purchase Intcomex common stock held by us for a purchase price of $3.0 million less any dividends paid on such shares to us prior to the exercise of the option. As of June 30, 2012, our investment in Intcomex was $23.0 million, which was included in “other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. If the Merger closes, we will write down the carrying value of the investment in Intcomex to reflect the price of the option offered to Intcomex.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue ~~and wireless devices handled~~ by division and service line

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		% ofTotal			2011		% ofTotal			Change
	(Amounts in 000s)
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)
Distribution revenue
Americas	$	~~131~~93,~~459~~427		118	%	$	~~128~~159,~~467~~824		1315	%		2(42	%)
Asia-Pacific		~~474~~417,~~184~~972		3837	%		~~370~~427,~~906~~089		3839	%		28(2	%)
EMEA		~~628~~629,~~701~~196		5155	%		~~485~~505,~~280~~072		4946	%		3025	%
Total	$	1,~~234~~140,~~344~~595		100	%	$	~~984~~1,~~653~~091,985		100	%		254	%
Logistic services revenue
Americas	$	~~101~~93,~~456~~402		7574	%	$	95101,~~615~~117		7371	%		6(8	%)
Asia-Pacific		1110,~~095~~122		8	%		1110,~~363~~672		97	%		(25	%)
EMEA		2322,~~193~~200		1718	%		2331,~~249~~140		1822	%		0(29	%)
Total	$	~~135~~125,~~744~~724		100	%	$	~~130~~142,~~227~~929		100	%		4(12	%)
Total revenue
Americas	$	~~232~~186,~~915~~829		1715	%	$	~~224~~260,~~082~~941		2021	%		4(28	%)
Asia-Pacific		~~485~~428,~~279~~094		3534	%		~~382~~437,~~269~~761		3435	%		27(2	%)
EMEA		651,~~894~~396		4851	%		~~508~~536,~~529~~212		4644	%		2821	%
Total	$	1,~~370~~266,~~088~~319		100	%	$	1,~~114~~234,~~880~~914		100	%		233	%
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		% ofTotal			2011		% ofTotal			Change
	(Amounts in 000s)
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)
Wireless devices sold through distribution
Distribution revenue
Americas	$	~~590~~224,885		109	%	$	~~709~~288,290		1514	%		(1722	%)
Asia-Pacific		2892,~~011~~156		3338	%		1797,~~360~~994		2838	%		4812	%
EMEA		31,~~434~~257,898		5753	%		2990,~~742~~354		5748	%		2527	%
Total	$	62,~~035~~374,939		100	%	$	42,~~811~~076,638		100	%		2514	%
Wireless devices handled through logistic services
Logistic services revenue
Americas	$	17194,~~636~~858		7675	%	$	18196,~~778~~732		8472	%		(61	%)
Asia-Pacific		~~996~~21,217		48	%		122,~~164~~034		58	%		(144	%)
EMEA		445,~~527~~392		2017	%		254,~~490~~390		1120	%		82(17	%)
Total	$	23261,~~159~~467		100	%	$	22273,~~432~~156		100	%		3(4	%)
Total wireless devices handled
Total revenue
Americas	$	18419,~~226~~743		6216	%	$	19485,~~487~~022		7221	%		(613	%)
Asia-Pacific		3913,~~007~~373		1035	%		2820,~~524~~028		935	%		1911	%
EMEA		71,~~961~~303,290		2849	%		51,~~232~~044,744		1944	%		5225	%
Total	$	292,~~194~~636,406		100	%	$	272,~~243~~349,794		100	%		712	%

1620

The following table presents the percentage changes in revenue for the three and six months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012 by service line compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior year, including the impact to revenue from changes in wireless devices handled, average selling price, non-handset based revenue, foreign currency, and acquisitions.

	2012 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2011
	Wirelessdeviceshandled(1)			AverageSellingPrice (2)			Non-handsetbasedrevenue(3)			ForeignCurrency			Acquisitions(4)			TotalPercentageChange inRevenue
Three months ended March 31, 2012:
Three months ended June 30, 2012:
Distribution		278	%		(23	%)		0(2	%)		(37	%)		32	%		254	%
Logistic services		(14	%)		(23	%)		6(5	%)		0(1	%)		1	%		4(12	%)
Total		247	%		(2	%)		1(2	%)		(26	%)		2	%		233	%
Six months ended June 30, 2012:
Distribution		16	%		1	%		(1	%)		(5	%)		3	%		14	%
Logistic services		(3	%)		(3	%)		2	%		(1	%)		1	%		(4	%)
Total		14	%		1	%		0	%		(5	%)		2	%		12	%

(1)	Wireless devices handled represents the percentage change in revenue due to the change in quantity of wireless devices sold through our distribution business and the change in quantity of wireless devices handled through our logistic services business.

(2)	Average selling price represents the percentage change in revenue due to the change in the average selling price of wireless devices sold through our distribution business and the change in the average fee per wireless device handled through our logistic services business.

(3)

Non-handset distribution revenue represents the percentage change in revenue from accessories sold, freight and non-voice navigation devices sold through our distribution business. Non-handset based logistic services revenue represents the percentage change in revenue from the sale of prepaid airtime, freight billed, fees earned from repair and remanufacture services and fee based services other than fees earned from wireless devices handled. Changes in non-handset based revenue do not include changes in reported wireless devices.

(4)	Acquisitions represent the percentage change in revenue from the incremental revenue generated from the formation of our joint venture in Malaysia on January 10, 2012.

The increase in wireless devices sold through distribution for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was primarily ~~driven~~due byto an increase in wireless devices sold in our ~~Europe,~~Germany ~~Middle East,~~ and ~~Africa~~Southeast ~~(EMEA)~~Asia ~~division~~operations due to anincreased ~~increase~~demand infor ~~wireless~~smartphones. Wireless devices sold ~~customer~~ in Germany and ~~an increase in wireless devices sold in our~~ Southeast Asia ~~operations. Wireless devices sold in Southeast Asia~~ for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 increased 5863% and 55% compared to the same period in prior year. There can be no assurances we will maintain this level of growth in Germany or Southeast Asia in future periods. ~~Revenue~~ Distribution revenue from sales of tablets was $4730.23 million and $76.7 million for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

The decrease in logistic services wireless devices handled for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to ~~0.7 million~~lower of devices handled inthrough ~~2011~~forward bylogistics services in our ~~Latin~~North America ~~operations~~operation. ~~that~~The ~~were~~decrease ~~contributed~~for tothe ~~Intcomex~~six inmonths ~~April~~ended ~~2011,~~was ~~lower~~also ~~devices~~impacted ~~handled~~by ~~for~~0.7 million ~~our~~devices ~~prepaid~~handled ~~and~~in ~~fixed~~2011 ~~fee~~by ~~customers in~~ our ~~North~~Latin America ~~operation~~operations asthat ~~well~~were ascontributed ato ~~decline~~Intcomex in ~~devices~~April ~~handled for a large customer in the Asia-Pacific region~~2011. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in wireless devices handled by our operation in South Africa on behalf of a network operator.

The ~~increase~~decrease in non-handset based logistic services revenue for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to anthe ~~increase~~decrease in sales of accessories and repair parts and an increase in repair services provided by our repair business in North America. The increase in repair services was due to our primary customer’s focus on increasing the volume offor ~~devices~~a wenon-handset ~~repaired~~fulfillment ~~compared~~program tofor ~~the~~a ~~first~~wireless ~~quarter~~device ofmanufacturer ~~2011~~ in ~~order to replenish the volume of devices in its refurbished device channel~~EMEA.

1721

Gross Profit and Gross Margin

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,														Six Months EndedJune 30,
(Amounts in 000’s)	2012			% ofTotal			2011			% ofTotal			Change
	2012			% ofTotal			2011			% ofTotal			Change		2012			% ofTotal			2011			% ofTotal			Change
Distribution	$	39,761			46	%	$	34,024			39	%	17%
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)														(Dollar amounts in 000s)
Logistic services		45,913			54	%		52,505			61	%	(13%)
Distribution	$	34,090			43	%	$	41,580			45	%		(18%)	$	73,851			45	%	$	75,604			42	%		(2%)
Gross Profit	$	85,674			100	%	$	86,529			100	%	(1%)
Logistic services		44,699			57	%		51,547			55	%		(13%)		90,611			55	%		104,052			58	%		(13%)
Distribution		3.2	%					3.5	%				(0.3) points
Gross Profit	$	78,789			100	%	$	93,127			100	%		(15%)	$	164,462			100	%	$	179,656			100	%		(8%)
Logistic services		33.8	%					40.3	%				(6.5) points
Distribution		3.0	%					3.8	%					(0.8) points		3.1	%					3.6	%					(0.5) points
Gross Margin		6.3	%					7.8	%				(1.5) points
Logistic services		35.6	%					36.1	%					(0.5) points		34.7	%					38.1	%					(3.4) points
Gross Margin		6.2	%					7.5	%					(1.3) points		6.2	%					7.6	%					(1.4) points

The ~~1.5 percentage point~~ decrease in ~~overall~~distribution gross ~~margin~~profit for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was ~~largely~~primarily due to selling ainventory ~~higher~~at ~~mix~~lower ofmargins ~~distribution~~in ~~revenue~~an ~~and~~effort ~~gross profit compared~~ to ~~the~~reduce ~~same~~inventory ~~period~~levels, ~~in the prior year as well as~~ a ~~decrease~~reduction in ~~logistic~~wireless ~~services~~devices ~~gross~~sold ~~profit.~~by ~~The~~our ~~decrease~~North inAmerica ~~distribution~~operation ~~gross~~due ~~margin~~to ~~for~~increased ~~the three months ended March 31~~competition, ~~2012 compared~~and ~~to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to~~ a decrease in ~~gross margins in our Americas and EMEA divisions. The reduction in distribution gross margin from~~ the ~~first~~average ~~quarter~~selling price of ~~2011~~smartphones ~~was~~sold ~~primarily due to current competitive and~~in ~~economic~~Southeast ~~pressures in the EMEA region~~Asia.

The decrease in gross ~~margin~~profit from logistic services for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~is primarily~~was due to a ~~shift~~decrease in volume ~~mix~~for ~~from~~a ~~higher~~non-handset ~~gross~~fulfillment ~~margin~~program tofor ~~lower~~a wireless device manufacturer in EMEA and a decrease in wireless devices handled through forward logistics services in our North America operation. The decrease in gross ~~margin~~profit from logistic services for the six months ended June 30, 2012 also resulted from a decrease in units handled for network operators in Norway, a shift in the mix of services provided by our reverse/repair/refurbish operation in ~~our~~North ~~Americas~~America, ~~division.~~and ~~Logistic~~the ~~services~~elimination of gross ~~margin~~profit ~~was~~generated ~~also~~in ~~negatively impacted by~~ the ~~sale~~first ~~of a~~half ~~high volume~~ of ~~spare~~2011 ~~parts~~by ~~related~~the tooperations ~~the~~in ~~repair~~Latin ~~business~~America inthat awere ~~particular~~contributed ~~region~~to atIntcomex ~~low~~in ~~margin~~April 2011.

The ~~increase~~1.3 and 1.4 percentage point decrease in ~~distribution~~overall gross ~~profit~~ margin for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was ~~primarily~~ due to andecreases ~~increase~~in both distribution and logistic services gross margin as well as a higher mix of distribution revenue compared to the same periods in ~~wireless~~the ~~devices~~prior ~~sold~~year. The decrease in distribution gross margin for the ~~Asia-Pacific~~three and ~~EMEA~~six ~~regions~~months ended June 30, ~~partially~~2012 ~~offset~~compared byto athe ~~reduction~~same period in ~~distribution~~the ~~gross~~prior ~~profit~~year was primarily due to ~~increased~~current ~~competition~~competitive inand ~~the~~economic ~~Americas~~pressures in EMEA ~~region~~and selling inventory at lower margins in an effort to reduce inventory levels.

The decrease in gross ~~profit~~margin from logistic services for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 was primarily due to a ~~decrease~~higher ~~in non-repair~~mix of lower gross margin logistic services provided by our reverse/repair/refurbish operation. inLogistic ~~North~~services ~~America,~~gross amargin ~~decrease~~was inalso ~~units~~negatively ~~handled~~impacted ~~for~~by ~~network operators in Norway and~~ the ~~elimination~~sale of ~~gross~~a high ~~profit~~volume ~~generated~~of inlow ~~the~~margin ~~first~~spare ~~quarter~~parts ofin ~~2011 by~~ the ~~operations~~ inrepair ~~Latin America that were contributed to Intcomex, Inc~~business. ~~in April 2011.~~

Selling General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012		2011		Change			2012		2011		Change
	(Amounts in 000s)
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)							(Dollar amounts in 000s)
SG&A expenses	$	6662,~~946~~578	$	6568,~~646~~976		2(9	%)	$	129,524	$	134,623		(4	%)

The ~~increase~~decrease in SG&A expenses for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior year was ~~primarily~~partially due to ~~incremental~~$3.1 ~~SG&A~~million of separation expense ~~from~~for our ~~previously~~former ~~announced~~CFO ~~joint~~that ~~venture~~was incurred in ~~Malaysia~~the ~~was~~second quarter of 2011. Fluctuations in foreign currency reduced SG&A expenses by $12.19 million and $3.7 million for the ~~first~~three ~~quarter~~and six ofmonths ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same periods in prior year. We also incurred $0.93 million and $1.3 million of costs in conjunction with the launch of our new global brand induring the ~~first~~three ~~quarter~~and ofsix ~~2012.~~months ~~Additionally~~ended June 30, ~~we had $0~~2012.7 We ~~million~~do ofnot ~~bad~~expect ~~debt~~the ~~expense~~costs ~~primarily~~ associated with ~~two~~the ~~specific~~global ~~customers~~brand into ~~our~~be ~~Americas~~material ~~division~~in future periods.

We22 do not expect the costs associated with the global brand to recur at this level in future periods. Fluctuations in foreign currency reduced SG&A expenses for the first quarter of 2012 by $0.8 million compared to the first quarter of 2011. SG&A expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 also included the recovery of $0.9 million of costs related to the settlement of a previously impaired asset from a vendor.

18SG&A expenses included $2.4 million and $5.6 million of non-cash stock based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $2.7 million and $6.4 million for the same periods in the prior year. The reduction in non-cash stock based compensation compared to the same periods in the prior year was due a decrease in expense for a portion of performance-based awards.

SG&A expenses included $3.2 million of non-cash stock based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $3.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The reduction in non-cash stock based compensation compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to the incremental $0.8 million of stock based compensation expense related to the resignation of an executive in the prior period.

Amortization Expense

Amortization expense was $76.05 million and $13.4 million for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to $56.0 million and $11.8 million for the same ~~period~~periods in the prior year. The increase in amortization expense ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year~~ was primarily due to the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets in our joint venture in Malaysia.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges were $2.2 million and $4.6 million for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. In February 2012, we signed a letter of intent to sell our facility in Reno, Nevada. WeAs ~~recorded~~of aJune 30, 2012 we have recorded $1.4 million of impairment ~~charge~~charges related to the anticipated sale of our facility in Reno, Nevada, which we expect to complete in the ~~second or~~ third quarter of 2012 as well as $0.2 million of operating costs for the facility. In the second quarter we also incurred $1.3 million of severance charges and accelerated non-cash stock based compensation expense related to the elimination of our global Chief Information Officer position. The elimination of this position is a result of reorganizing our information technology structure from a global approach to a regional approach. Restructuring charges for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 also include $0.8 million of severance charges for headcount reduction in our Americas division and $0.29 million of severance charges in our EMEA and Corporate divisions as part of separate restructuring plans.

Restructuring charge was $3.8 million and $4.2 ~~charges~~million for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. ~~primarily~~During ~~consist~~the second quarter of ~~severance~~2011, we announced a plan to relocate our Touchstone Wireless operations from Bristol, Tennessee and ~~lease~~consolidate ~~termination~~the ~~charges~~operations into our existing facilities in ~~connection~~Fort ~~with~~Worth, ~~our~~Texas ~~implementation~~and ofPlainfield, ~~Centers~~Indiana. We recorded $2.0 million of ~~Excellence~~severance, ~~and~~lease atermination ~~Shared~~and ~~Services~~asset ~~Center~~impairment charges in relation to this plan during the ~~EMEA~~second ~~region~~quarter of 2011.

Severance, lease termination and asset impairment charges of $1.4 million and $2.0 million were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 in connection with continued global entity consolidation and rationalization related to the implementation of Centers of Excellence and a Shared Services Center in the EMEA division. During the second quarter of 2011, we also recorded $0.3 million of severance charges for headcount reduction in our Asia-Pacific and Americas divisions and $0.1 million for asset impairment as a result of the Intcomex transaction. The charge for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is partially offset by a $0.2 million reversal of severance charges related to the settlement of a dispute with a former employee.

Operating Income from Continuing Operations:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,															Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			% ofTotal			2011			% ofTotal			Change			2012			% ofTotal			2011			% ofTotal			Change
	(Amounts in 000s)
	(Dollar amounts in 000’s)															(Dollar amounts in 000’s)
Americas	$	119,~~102~~299			~~119~~NM	%	$	1714,~~748~~853			~~121~~107	%		(37	%)	$	20,401			201	%	$	32,600			114	%		(37	%)
Asia-Pacific		75,~~149~~324			77NM	%		58,~~809~~240			4060	%		23(35	%)		12,473			123	%		14,049			49	%		(11	%)
EMEA		3(1,~~240~~430	)		35NM	%		36,~~726~~473			2547	%		(13122	%)		1,810			18	%		10,200			36	%		(82	%)
Corporate		(12,~~153~~391	)		~~(131~~NM	%)		(1215,~~577~~725	)		(86114	%)		(321	%)		(24,545	)		(242	%)		(28,303	)		(99	%)		(13	%)
Total	$	~~9,338~~802			100	%	$	1413,~~706~~841			100	%		(3794	%)	$	10,139			100	%	$	28,546			100	%		(64	%)

19NM = Not meaningful

Operating Income as a Percent of Revenue by Division:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,										Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011			Change				2012			2011			Change
Americas		45.80	%		75.97	%		(30.~~1) points~~7	)	points		4.9	%		6.7	%		(1.8	)	points
Asia-Pacific		1.52	%		1.59	%		(0.~~0 points~~7	)	points		1.4	%		1.7	%		(0.3	)	points
EMEA		(0.52	%)		01.72	%		(01.~~2) points~~4	)	points		0.1	%		1.0	%		(0.9	)	points
Total		0.71	%		1.31	%		(01.60	) ~~points~~	points		0.4	%		1.2	%		(0.8	)	points

~~Operating~~The ~~income~~decrease in ~~our~~operating ~~Americas~~income ~~division~~and ~~decreased~~operating ~~$6.6~~income ~~million~~as a percentage of revenue for the three and six months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012 was primarily due to ~~lower~~ ~~distribution~~the ~~gross~~following ~~profit~~factors: asa) ~~discussed~~$5.0 ~~above,~~million aof ~~decrease~~contract inamendment ~~non-repair~~expense ~~logistic~~in ~~services~~conjunction ~~provided~~with bythe ~~our~~Merger ~~reverse/repair/refurbish~~to ~~operation~~eliminate inthe ~~North~~non-competition ~~America~~covenants ~~compared~~applicable to ~~the~~us ~~same period~~ in the ~~prior~~Shareholders ~~year,~~Agreement with Intcomex; b) $01.78 million of ~~bad~~merger ~~debt~~expenses ~~expense,~~incurred related to the Merger and $2 c) a decrease in both distribution and logistic services gross profit as discussed above.2 ~~million~~These offactors ~~restructuring~~were partially offset by decreases in SG&A expense and restructuring charges.

Operating income in our Asia-Pacific division increased $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due to an increase in distribution gross profit discussed above, partially offset by $1.1 million of incremental SG&A expense from the joint venture in Malaysia that was formed in January 2012 and $1.1 million of amortization for finite-lived intangible assets acquired in the formation of the Malaysian joint venture.

Operating income in our EMEA division decreased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in logistics services profit resulting from a decrease in logistic services provided to network operators in Norway. The decrease in gross profit from logistic services is partially offset by an increase in distribution gross profit due to an increase in wireless devices sold compared to the same period in the prior year.

Operating loss in our Corporate division decreased $0.4 million compared to the same period in the prior year due to a reduction in operating expenses in our Corporate headquarters. Operating loss in our Corporate division for the three months ended March 31, 2012 includes $0.9 million of costs from the launch of our new global brand as discussed above. Operating loss in our Corporate division for the three months ended March 31, 2011 included the recovery of $0.9 million of costs related to the settlement of a previously impaired asset from a vendor.

Interest, net

The components of interest, net are as follows:

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,									Six Months EndedJune 30,
(Amounts in 000’s)	2012			2011			Change
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Interest expense	$	4,116		$	3,310			24	%
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)									(Dollar amounts in 000s)
Interest income		(225	)		(345	)		(35	%)
Interest expense	$	4,068		$	4,545			(10	%)	$	8,184		$	7,854			4	%
Interest, net	$	3,891		$	2,965			31	%
Interest income		(174	)		(185	)		(6	%)		(399	)		(529	)		(25	%)
Interest, net	$	3,894		$	4,360			(11	%)	$	7,785		$	7,325			6	%

Interest expense includes interest on outstanding debt, charges for accounts receivable factoring programs, fees paid for unused capacity on credit lines and amortization of deferred financing fees.

The ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to a lower interest rate on our Global Credit Facility compared to the same period in prior year. In September 2011 we entered into an ~~increase~~amendment of our Credit Agreement that decreased the interest rate 50 basis points. The increase in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was due to increased borrowings on our Global Credit Facility. offset with the decrease in the interest rate.

20Gain on investment in Intcomex, Inc.

~~Other~~On ~~Expense~~April 19, 2011, we completed our investment in the U.S. based company Intcomex, Inc. Under this agreement, we invested $13.0 million, subject to working capital adjustments, and contributed our Colombia and Guatemala operations and certain of our other Latin America operations, excluding certain legacy business in Puerto Rico, for an approximate 23% share of the outstanding common stock of Intcomex. The investment is an equity method investment and our share of earnings (~~Income~~losses) in Intcomex will be recorded below operating income in the consolidated statement of operations three months in arrears in order to meet our reporting deadlines. We recorded a $3.0 million non-cash, non-taxable gain on investment for the difference between the fair value of the investment received in Intcomex and the carrying value of the assets contributed.

~~Other~~24 income was $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to other expense of $1.2 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in other income was primarily due to a decrease in foreign currency transaction losses as well as income recorded in the first quarter of 2012 from the equity method accounting treatment of our investment in Intcomex, Inc. which we acquired in April 2011.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income was $1.1 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to other expense of $0.2 million and $1.4 million for the same periods in the prior year. The increase in other income was primarily due to income recorded of $1.0 million and $1.7 million from the equity method investment of Intcomex. Other income also increased for the six months ended due to a decrease in foreign currency transaction losses.

Income Tax Expense

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Three Months EndedJune 30,									Six Months EndedJune 30,
(Amounts in 000’s)	2012			2011			Change
	2012			2011			Change			2012		2011			Change
Income tax expense (benefit)	$	2,608		$	2,559		2%
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)									(Dollar amounts in 000s)
Effective tax rate		45.9	%		24.2	%	21.7 points
Income tax expense	$	2,721		$	533			411	%	$	5,329	$	3,092			72	%
Effective tax rate		NM			4.3	%					NM		13.5	%

~~Income~~NM ~~tax~~= ~~expense~~Not was approximately $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 includes a $0.6 million charge for a discrete tax adjustment in a foreign jurisdiction. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 included $0.4 million of income tax benefit related to the reversal of valuation allowances on certain tax assets and foreign tax credits that are expected to be utilized in the U.S. Excluding the charge in 2012 and the benefit in 2011, the effective income tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were 34.7% and 28.2%. The higher adjusted effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily due to a shift in geographic mix of income, a higher 2012 expected income tax rate on certain income generated in a foreign jurisdiction as well as taxable losses in certain entities for which the Company is not recording an income tax benefit. meaningful

Income tax expense was $2.7 million and $5.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $0.5 million and $3.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 included a $1.9 million valuation allowance on foreign tax credits that are no longer expected to be utilized in the U.S. and a $0.5 million valuation allowance in Denmark as a result of a change in tax law that limits the amount of net operating loss carryforward that can be utilized to offset taxable income. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 also included a $0.6 million charge for a discrete tax adjustment in a foreign jurisdiction.

Discontinued Operations

The consolidated statements of operations reflect the reclassification of the results of from our continuing operations to discontinued operations for all periods presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. ~~Details~~Discontinued operations, net of ~~discontinued~~income ~~operations~~taxes, resulted in income of $0.2 million and a loss of $0.4 million for the three and six months ended ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012, compared to a loss of $1.1 million and ~~2011~~income ~~are~~of as$0.2 ~~follows~~million ~~(in~~for ~~thousands):~~the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2012			2011
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes (1)	$	(268	)		1,830
Income tax expense (benefit)		—			—
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		(268	)		1,830
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations (2)		(280	)		(541	)
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$	(548	)	$	1,289

(1) Gain from discontinued operations before income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily relates to the liquidation of our discontinued France operation. We abandoned our France operation in the third quarter of 2009.

(2) Loss on disposal of discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 primarily relates to cumulative currency translation adjustments.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity Analysis

We measure liquidity as the sum of total unrestricted cash and unused borrowing availability, and we use this measurement as an indicator of how much access to cash we have to either grow the business through investment in new markets, acquisitions, or through expansion of existing service or product lines or to contend with adversity such as unforeseen operating losses potentially caused by reduced demand for our products and services, material uncollectible accounts receivable, or material inventory write-downs. The table below shows our liquidity calculation.

~~The~~25 ~~table below shows our liquidity calculation.~~

(Amounts in 000s)	March 31,2012		December 31,2011		% Change
(Dollar amounts in 000s)	June 30,2012		December 31,2011		% Change
Unrestricted cash	$	2229,~~721~~667	$	40,041		(4326	%)
Unused borrowing availability		~~259~~360,~~363~~631		292,774		~~(11~~23	%)
Liquidity	$	~~282~~390,~~084~~298	$	332,815		~~(15~~17	%)

Total liquidity ~~decreased~~increased by $5057.75 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011 ~~primarily~~partially due to ~~the~~ ~~timing~~$30.1 million of ~~payments~~cash toprovided ~~vendors~~by asworking ~~well~~capital asand ~~the~~a ~~timing~~decrease ofin cash ~~collections~~used ~~from~~in ~~large~~investing ~~customers~~activities induring ~~our~~the ~~EMEA~~first ~~division~~half of 2012.

Funds generated by operating activities, available unrestricted cash, and our unused borrowing availability continue to be our most significant sources of liquidity. Unused borrowing availability may be limited because of covenant restrictions in our ~~credit~~ credit agreements. Additionally, our Global Credit Facility permits the factoring of up to $250 million of receivables in operations outside of the U.S. We currently have agreements with unrelated third-parties for the factoring of specific accounts receivable in Germany and Spain up to an aggregate of approximately $96 million. Proceeds received under these agreements reduce accounts receivable outstanding while increasing cash. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we had sold $3349.70 million of accounts receivable pursuant to these agreements.

We believe funds generated from the expected results of operations, available unrestricted cash and unused borrowing availability will be sufficient to finance strategic initiatives, working capital needs, ~~the $36.6 million remaining for potential share repurchases under our previously announced $130 million share repurchase program~~ and investment opportunities for the next 12 months. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our credit facilities. As of ~~March~~ June 3130, 2012, we had $2229.74 million of cash and cash equivalents ~~mostly~~ held by foreign subsidiaries. We consider any cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested to meet non-U.S. liquidity needs.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

We use the indirect method of preparing and presenting our statements of cash flows. In our opinion, it is more practical than the direct method and provides the reader with a good perspective and analysis of our cash flows.

	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	Six Months EndedJune 30,
	2012			2011			Change
	(Amounts in 000s)
	(Dollar amounts in 000s)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	~~(45~~68,~~437~~797	)	$	(9719,~~385~~046	)	$	5187,~~948~~843
Investing activities		(1216,~~650~~785	)		(2254,~~351~~663	)		937,~~701~~878
Financing activities		39(61,~~329~~250	)		~~103~~52,~~280~~923			(63114,~~951~~173	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(1,~~454~~557	)		12,~~794~~944			(~~340~~4,501	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(17,304	)	$	(14,662	)	$	(2,642	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(10,795	)	$	(17,842	)	$	7,047

Net cash ~~used~~provided inby operating activities was $4568.48 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to net cash used of $9719.4 0 million for the same period in the prior year. During the fourth quarter of 2010, one of our key global vendors experienced invoicing issues that caused an unusually high accounts payable balance at the end of 2010. These invoices were paid in the first quarter of 2011. Net cash used for operating activities would have been approximately $53.0 million lower for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 had these invoicing issues not occurred. Excluding the impact of these invoicing issues, net cash ~~used~~provided inby operating activities ~~was~~increased ~~consistent~~$34.8 ~~with~~million compared to the same period in prior year due to a concerted effort to reduce inventory levels.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1216.78 million for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to $2254.47 million for the same period in the prior year. Net cash used in investing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 includes a $6.1 million an investment in our Malaysian joint venture and $3.3 million of inventory and fixed assets purchased from STC Group at closing. Net cash used for investing activities for the ~~three~~ six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 included an investment in Intcomex of $13.0 million and the purchase of a facility in Reno, Nevada for $11.7 million.

~~Net~~26 cash provided by financing activities was $39.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $103.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The change is primarily due to a decrease in net debt borrowings of $63.3 million compared to the same period in the prior year.

Net cash used in financing activities was $61.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $52.9 million for the same period in the prior year. The change is primarily due to a decrease in net debt borrowings during the first half of 2012. In 2011, net debt borrowings increased to fund the investments discussed above.

Cash Conversion Cycle

A key source of our liquidity is our ability to invest in inventory, sell the inventory to our customers, collect cash from our customers and pay our suppliers. We refer to this as the cash conversion cycle. For additional information regarding this measurement and the detailed calculation of the components of the cash conversion cycle, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,2012			March 31,2011			December 31,2011
	June 30,2012			June 30,2011			March 31,2012
Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable		2928			2527			2629
Days inventory on-hand		3330			3226			2933
Days payable outstanding		(4548	)		(48	)		(4345	)
Cash Conversion Cycle Days		1710			95			1217

The cash conversion cycle increased 85 days for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year. ~~Days~~The ~~sales outstanding increased due to an~~ increase in ~~distribution~~days ~~revenue~~inventory ~~and~~on-hand ~~accounts~~was ~~receivable~~due ~~from~~to ~~large~~increased ~~customers~~inventory levels in ~~Germany~~the ~~and~~Southeast ~~Sweden.~~Asia ~~These customers have longer payment terms than our average payment terms,~~ and ~~distribution~~ ~~revenue~~North ~~and~~America ~~accounts~~operations ~~receivable~~compared ~~from~~to ~~these customers increased significantly over~~ the ~~prior~~same ~~year~~period ~~due to aggressive efforts by these customers to maintain market share with consumers~~ in the ~~smartphone~~prior ~~segment of the wireless industry~~year. ~~The~~ ~~decrease in days payable outstanding compared~~

to the first quarter of 2011 was primarily due to temporary extended payment terms on inventory purchased in our Southeast Asia operation during the first quarter of 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, we began a purchase card program to make low value, non-stock purchases, or as an alternate form of payment for inventory purchases of up to $30 million. The outstanding balance on this program was $16.0 million as of March 31, 2012, which had an immaterial effect on days payable outstanding.

Borrowings

The table below summarizes the borrowing capacity that was available to us as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 (in thousands):

Gross Availability

Outstanding

Letters of Credit &Guarantees

NetAvailability

Global Credit Facility

500,000

~~284~~178,~~896~~253

1,~~261~~167

~~213~~320,~~843~~580

Other

56,~~672~~334

1116,~~152~~283

—

4540,~~520~~051

Total

556,~~672~~334

~~296~~194,~~048~~536

1,~~261~~167

~~259~~360,~~363~~631

We have $35.75 million of guarantees and $0.4 million of short-term borrowings that do not impact our net availability under ~~our~~the Credit Agreement. Our ability to borrow amounts available is based primarily on a leverage ratio test, measured quarterly as total funded indebtedness over EBITDA adjusted, as defined in the credit agreement. Decreases in adjusted EBITDA could limit our availability to borrow additional funds to adequately finance operations and expansion strategies.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 we were in compliance with the covenants in our credit agreements. Our Global Credit Facility contains two financial covenants that are sensitive to significant fluctuations in earnings: a maximum leverage ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The leverage ratio is calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter, and is calculated as total debt (including guarantees and letters of credit) divided by trailing twelve month bank adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (bank adjusted EBITDA). The fixed charge coverage ratio is also calculated as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and is calculated as trailing twelve months ~~consolidated~~bank ~~cash~~adjusted ~~flow~~EBITDA less capital expenditures divided by trailing twelve months of consolidated fixed charges. Consolidated fixed charges are calculated as net cash outflow for interest, income taxes, and recurring dividends.

Ratio	Global Credit Facility covenant	Company ratio at March 31, 2012
Maximum leverage ratio	Not to exceed 3.0:1.0	2.1:1.0
Fixed charge coverage ratio	Not below 2.0:1.0	3.9:1.0


Ratio	Global Credit Facility covenant	Company ratio at June 30, 2012
Maximum leverage ratio	Not to exceed 3.0:1.0		1.5:1.0
Fixed charge coverage ratio	Not below 2.0:1.0		3.6:1.0

We believe that we will continue to be in compliance with our debt covenants for the next 12 months.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in our exposure to market risk since the disclosure in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. Based on their evaluation, as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

2428

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is from time to time involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of conducting its business. While the ultimate liability pursuant to these actions cannot currently be determined, the Company believes these legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. For more information on legal proceedings, see Note 10 Legal Proceedings and Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Other than as provided below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in the report listed above.

Failure to close the merger could negatively impact the market price of BrightPoint common stock.

If the merger is not consummated for any reason, BrightPoint will be subject to a number of material risks, including the following:

•

the market price of BrightPoint’s common stock may decline;

•

costs relating to the merger, such as legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, and, in specified circumstances, termination fees, must be paid by BrightPoint, even if the merger is not consummated; and

•

the diversion of management’s attention from the day-to-day business of BrightPoint, the potential disruption to its employees and its relationships with customers, suppliers and distributors and potential diversion from certain aspects of its previously announced capital expenditure program may make it difficult for BrightPoint to regain its financial and market position.

If the merger is not approved by our shareholders at the special meeting, BrightPoint, Ingram Micro and Merger Sub will not be permitted under Indiana law to close the merger, and each of BrightPoint, Ingram Micro and Merger Sub will have the right to terminate the merger agreement. Upon such termination, BrightPoint may be required to pay Ingram Micro a termination fee.

Further, if the merger is terminated and our Board of Directors seeks another merger or business combination, shareholders cannot be certain that we will be able to find a party willing to pay an equivalent or better price than the price to be paid in the proposed merger.

Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause BrightPoint to lose key personnel.

Our current and prospective employees may be uncertain about their future roles and relationships with BrightPoint following the closing of the merger. This uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key management and personnel.

BrightPoint’s executive officers and directors have certain interests in the merger different from, and in addition to, other shareholders that may have influenced them to adopt the merger agreement and merger and recommend the approval of the merger agreement by shareholders.

BrightPoint’s directors and executive officers have interests in the transaction that are different from, and in addition to, the interests of BrightPoint shareholders generally, including with respect to employment and compensation arrangements pursuant to offer letters with Ingram Micro, payments under BrightPoint’s executive compensation plans and Agreements for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits, indemnification, restricted stock units and other arrangements, which may present an actual or potential conflict of interest. Our Board of Directors, and the executive officers in making recommendations to our Board of Directors relating to the merger, was aware of these interests and considered that these interests may be different from, and in addition to, the interests of our shareholders generally, among other matters, in adopting the merger agreement and the merger, and in determining to recommend that our shareholders vote for approval of the merger agreement.

BrightPoint will no longer exist as an independent public company following the merger and BrightPoint’s shareholders will forego any increase in our value thereafter.

If the merger is closed, BrightPoint will be a subsidiary of Ingram Micro and will no longer be a publicly held corporation, and our shareholders will forego any increase in our value that might have otherwise resulted from our possible growth.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

	Total Number ofShares Purchased			Average Price Paidper Share		Total Number ofShares purchasedas Part of PubliclyAnnounced Plansor Programs		Maximum DollarValue of Sharesthat May Yet BePurchased Underthe Plans orPrograms
January 1, 2012 – January 31, 2012		—			—		—	$	36,608,398
February 1, 2012 – February 28, 2012		1,634	(1)	$	10.23		—	$	36,608,398
March 1, 2012 – March 31, 2012		—			—		—	$	36,608,398
Total		1,634		$	10.23		—	$	36,608,398

As of June 30, 2012, there is approximately $36.6 million of availability remaining under the previously announced share repurchase program that allows for share repurchases of up to $130 million. The share repurchase program expires on December 31, 2012. Due to the pending merger, we do not expect to repurchase any shares of common stock in the future.

~~(1)~~We ~~Represents~~did not repurchase any shares ~~surrendered~~of tocommon stock under the ~~Company~~share torepurchase ~~pay~~program ~~withholding~~during ~~taxes~~the ~~due~~second ~~upon~~quarter ~~vesting~~of 2012. As of ~~restricted~~June 30, ~~stock~~2012, ~~awards~~we have repurchased 15,382,164 shares at a weighted average price of $6.07 per share under the share repurchase program. This includes the repurchase of 3.0 million BrightPoint shares from NC Telecom Holding A/S for $15.5 million in October 2009 as well as 9.2 million BrightPoint shares from Partner Escrow Holding A/S, an affiliate of NC Telecom Holding A/S for $6.20 per share, for an aggregate of $57.3 million in January 2010.

As30 of March 31, 2012, there is approximately $36.6 million of availability remaining under the previously announced share repurchase program that allows for share repurchases of up to $130 million. The share repurchase program expires on December 31, 2012.

We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the share repurchase program during the first quarter of 2012. As of March 31, 2012, we have repurchased 15,382,164 shares at a weighted average price of $6.07 per share under the share repurchase program. This includes the repurchase of 3.0 million Brightpoint shares from NC Telecom Holding A/S for $15.5 million in October 2009 as well as 9.2 million Brightpoint shares from Partner Escrow Holding A/S, an affiliate of NC Telecom Holding A/S for $6.20 per share, for an aggregate of $57.3 million in January 2010.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Brightpoint, Inc. Ingram Micro Inc. and Beacon Sub, Inc.* (1)
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
10.1		Employment Agreement between the Company and Anurag Gupta dated May 4, 2012. (2)
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
10.2		Relocation Agreement between the Company and Anurag Gupta dated as of May 4, 2012. (2)
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (1)
10.3		Release Agreement dated as of June 29, 2012 by and among the Brightpoint Parties, Intcomex and the other Intcomex shareholders. (1)
99.1		Cautionary Statements (1)
10.4		Option Agreement dated as of June 29, 2012 by and among the Brightpoint Parties, Intcomex and the other Intcomex shareholders. (1)
101		The following material from Brightpoint, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (1)
10.5		Sixth Amendment dated July 12, 2012 to Credit Agreement dated February 16, 2007 by and among Brightpoint, Inc. (and certain of its subsidiaries identified therein), Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent with participation in the facility by Banc of America Securities Limited, Bank of America, N.A., Sydney Branch, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., Bank of America, N.A., DNB Nor Bank ASA, Fifth Third Bank, Nordea Bank Finland PLC, PNC Bank, National Association, BNP Paribas, Regions Bank, Compass Bank, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, US Bank National Association, and The Huntington National Bank. (3)
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (4)
99.1		Cautionary Statements (4)
99.2		Joint Press Release Issued by Brightpoint, Inc. and Ingram Micro Inc. (1)
99.3		Press Release of Brightpoint, Inc. regarding the three months ended June 30, 2012; Financial Results dated July 2, 2012. (1)
101		The following material from Brightpoint, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (4)

(1) ~~Filed~~Incorporated ~~herewith~~by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2012.

26(2) Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2012.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2012.

(4)	Filed herewith.

*	The Company has omitted certain schedules and exhibits pursuant to the 601(b)(2) of regulation S-K and shall furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the SEC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	~~Brightpoint, Inc.~~	Brightpoint, Inc.
	~~(Registrant)~~	(Registrant)
Date: April 30, 2012	/s/ Robert J. Laikin
Date: August 8, 2012		/s/ Robert J. Laikin
	~~Robert J. Laikin~~	Robert J. Laikin
	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
		Chairman of the Board and
	(Principal Executive Officer)
		Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 30, 2012	/s/ Vincent Donargo
		(Principal Executive Officer)
	Vincent Donargo
Date: August 8, 2012		/s/ Vincent Donargo
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
		Vincent Donargo
	(Principal Financial Officer)
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 30, 2012	/s/ Robert L. Colin
		and Treasurer
	Robert L. Colin
		(Principal Financial Officer)
	Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer
Date: August 8, 2012		/s/ Robert L. Colin
	(Principal Accounting Officer)
		Robert L. Colin
		Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller, Chief
		Accounting Officer
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

2732

Filing Compare · BRIGHTPOINT INC