OnTable June 28, 2012, Legacy completed its previously announced sale of its assets in Wyoming’s Big Horn Basin (the “Wyoming Assets”) to BreitBurn Operating L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BBEP), for total cash consideration of approximately US$93 million, being the original purchase price of approximately US$98 million less approximately US$5 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustments. Contents

TheTable objective of the use of derivative financial instruments is to achieve more predictable cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage its exposure to commodity price risk. While the use of these derivative instruments limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, these instruments may also limit our ability to benefit from Favorable price movements. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

Commission File No. 000-54162

LOGO

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Canada		61-1606563
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1160 Eugenia Pl, Suite 100,
1160 Eugenia Pl, Suite 100, Carpinteria, California USA 93013		Tel: (805) 566 2900
Carpinteria, California USA 93013		Tel: (805) 566 2900
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Registrant’s telephone number,including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

69,834,396 shares, no par value, of the Registrant’s common stock were issued and outstanding as of ~~August~~October 922, 2012.

INDEX

PART 1—FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)	3
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	1618
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	26
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	2627
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION		2628
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	28
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	2628
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	2628
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	2628
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	2628
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	2628
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	2729
SIGNATURES		2830

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of

NIMIN ENERGY CORP.

As at and for the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011

Expressed in US dollars

NiMin Energy Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Net Assets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 (Liquidation Basis)

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011 (Going Concern Basis)

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	81,950,992	$	3,811,028
Trade accounts receivable		2,082,405		3,131,004
Receivable from asset acquirers		3,065,359
Restricted investments		3,928,002
Prepaid expenses and well costs				311,922
Crude oil inventory				149,553
Total current assets		91,026,758		7,403,507
Debt issuance costs, net				3,497,867
Restricted investments				784,261
Equipment, net				287,918
Crude oil and natural gas properties - full cost method
Proved properties, net				78,077,780
Unproved properties				468,042
Total assets	$	91,026,758	$	90,519,375
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,610,706	$	3,751,660
Accrued liabilities		723,503		1,253,855
Accrued professional fees related to liquidation		3,964,723
Accrued payroll related to liquidation		3,009,757
Other costs related to liquidation		562,943
Income tax liability		2,478,263
Asset retirement obligations		762,328
Commodity derivative liability				976,929
Current portion of long-term debt				4,050,000
Total current liabilities		13,112,223		10,032,444
Long-term debt				31,950,000
Asset retirement obligations				1,180,661
Options				136,773
Warrants				235,134
Total liabilities	$	13,112,223	$	43,535,012
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, unlimited shares authorized, 69,834,396 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and 69,834,396 as of December 31, 2011				108,758,460
Additional paid in capital				12,177,534
Accumulated deficit				(73,951,631	)
Total stockholders’ equity				46,984,363
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$		$	90,519,375
Net assets in liquidation (Note 2)	$	77,914,535
Net assets in liquidation per outstanding share	$	1.12

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	79,204,306	$	3,811,028
Other accounts receivable		50,905		—
Trade accounts receivable		—		3,131,004
Restricted investments		3,853,002		—
Prepaid expenses and well costs		—		311,922
Crude oil inventory		—		149,553

Total current assets		83,108,213		7,403,507
Debt issuance costs		—		3,497,867
Restricted investments		—		784,261
Equipment, net		—		287,918
Crude oil and natural gas properties—full cost method
Proved properties, net		—		78,077,780
Unproved properties		—		468,042

Total assets	$	83,108,213	$	90,519,375

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	52,382	$	3,751,660
Accrued liabilities		25,919		1,253,855
Accrued professional fees related to liquidation		1,976,996		—
Other costs related to liquidation		228,237		—
Income tax liability		1,458,816		—
Asset retirement obligations		622,294		—
Commodity derivative liability		—		976,929
Current portion of long-term debt		—		4,050,000

Total current liabilities		4,364,644		10,032,444
Long-term debt		—		31,950,000
Asset retirement obligations		—		1,180,661
Options		—		136,773
Warrants		—		235,134

Total liabilities	$	4,364,644	$	43,535,012

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, unlimited shares authorized, 69,834,396 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and 69,834,396 as of December 31, 2011				108,758,460
Additional paid in capital				12,177,534
Accumulated deficit				(73,951,631	)

Total stockholders’ equity				46,984,363

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$		$	90,519,375


Net assets in liquidation (Note 2)	$	78,743,569

Net assets in liquidation per outstanding share	$	1.13

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive ~~Income~~Loss (Going Concern Basis)

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Three monthsended June 30,2012			Three monthsended June 30,2011			Six monthsended June 30,2012			Six monthsended June 30,2011
	Six monthsended June 30			Three monthsended Sept. 30			Nine monthsended Sept. 30
Crude oil and natural gas revenues	$	4,836,963		$	5,704,103		$	10,985,590		$	10,936,376
	2012			2011			2011
Expenses:
Crude oil and natural gas revenues	$	10,985,590		$	6,465,744		$	17,402,120
Operating costs		2,140,088			2,907,296			4,257,619			4,904,535
Expenses:
General and administrative		3,923,296			1,576,382			6,043,260			4,110,066
Operating costs		4,257,619			3,826,968			8,731,503
Liquidation related expenses		7,537,423						7,537,423
General and administrative		6,043,260			1,833,516			5,943,582
Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and accretion		799,536			778,955			1,697,361			1,569,988
Liquidation related expenses		7,537,423			0			0
Loss / (Gain) on crude oil derivative contracts		(875,373	)		(1,501,662	)		(189,507	)		1,133,309
Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and accretion		1,697,361			951,079			2,521,067
		13,524,970			3,760,971			19,346,156			11,717,898
(Gain)/Loss on crude oil derivative contract		(189,507	)		(2,589,821	)		(1,456,512	)
Income (loss) from operations		(8,688,007	)		1,943,132			(8,360,566	)		(781,522	)
		19,346,156			4,021,742			15,739,640
Interest income		5,741			14,542			10,673			27,170
Income (loss) before other items		(8,360,566	)		2,444,002			1,662,480
Interest expense		(5,058,031	)		(1,352,032	)		(6,443,178	)		(2,630,690	)
Interest income		10,673			10,331			37,501
Foreign exchange (loss) gain					(299	)		(438	)		164,589
Interest expense		(6,443,178	)		(1,382,432	)		(4,013,122	)
Change in fair value of options		562,542			63,176			296,519			63,176
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		(438	)		74,969			239,558
Change in fair value of warrants		458,960			3,175,483			235,134			(1,394,054	)
Change in fair value of options		296,519			386,090			449,266
Other		(25,427	)		(13,178	)		(22,818	)		(95,058	)
Change in fair value of warrants		235,134			2,083,820			689,766
Other Reclamation Costs		(659,115	)					(659,115	)
Other		(22,818	)		25,232			(69,826	)
Gain on sale of oil & gas properties and equipment		46,280,232						46,280,232
Other Reclamation Costs		(659,115	)		0			0
		41,564,902			1,887,692			39,697,009			(3,864,867	)
Gain on sale of oil & gas properties and equipment		46,280,232			0			0
Income (loss) before taxes		32,876,895			3,830,824			31,336,443			(4,646,389	)
		39,697,009			1,198,010			(2,666,857	)
Income tax expense		2,478,263						2,478,263
Income (loss) before taxes		31,336,443			3,642,012			(1,004,377	)
Net Income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)		30,398,632			3,830,824			28,858,180			(4,646,389	)
Income tax expense		2,478,263			—			—
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	0.44		$	0.06		$	0.41		$	(0.07	)
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)		28,858,180			3,642,012			(1,004,377	)
Basic and diluted income/(loss) per share	$	0.41		$	0.05		$	(0.02	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Going Concern Basis)

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and nine months ended September 30, 2011

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Six MonthsEnded June 30,2012			~~Six~~Nine MonthsEnded ~~June~~September 30,2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Income (loss)	$	28,858,180		$	(4,646,389	)
Net lncome (loss)	$	28,858,180		$	(1,004,377	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net lncome (loss)by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion, amortization, and accretion		1,697,361			12,~~569~~521,~~988~~067
Change in fair value of options		(296,519	)		(63449,~~176~~266	)
Change in fair value of warrants		(235,134	)		1(689,~~394,054~~766	)
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss		—			~~(164~~88,~~589~~436	)
Gain on sale of oil & gas properties		(46,377,296	)		—
Stock-based compensation		2,289,567			1,~~334~~861,~~068~~058
Unrealized (gain) loss on crude oil derivative contracts		82,731			~~356~~(2,~~446~~317,383	)
Write down of fixed assets		8297,~~731~~064			—
Loss on sale of non-oil & gas properties		97,064
Non-cash interest expense		3,497,867			648,125
Non-cash interest expense		3,497,867			398,424
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Trade accounts receivable		1,061,589			(1,~~345~~917,~~021~~254	)
Prepaid expenses		311,922			~~173~~(98,~~706~~582	)
Crude oil inventory		149,553			53127,~~069~~014
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		7,850,251			1507,~~060,203~~578
Asset retirement obligation		659,114			—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(353,~~751~~750	)		~~120~~(723,~~783~~350	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of and expenditures on crude oil and natural gas properties		(1,579,255	)		(1117,~~213~~769,~~640~~293	)
Sale of oil & gas properties		119,245,819			—
Purchase of equipment		—			(6368,~~699~~564	)
Increase in restricted investments		(3,143,741	)		19,689
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		114,522,823			(1117,~~277~~818,~~339~~168	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt		(36,000,000	)		—
Repurchase of options		(29,108	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common shares (net of costs)					7,736,015
Exercise of warrants and options		—			8,181,848
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(36,029,108	)		7,736,015
Proceeds from issuance of common shares (net of costs)		—			3,609,819
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period		78,139,964			(3,420,541	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(36,029,108	)		11,791,667
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period		78,139,964			(6,749,851	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		3,811,028			9,490,005
Foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents		—			~~164~~(112,~~589~~004	)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	81,950,992		$	62,~~234~~628,~~053~~150
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	2,945,444		$	23,~~231~~365,~~507~~753
Cash paid for income tax expense	$	—		$	—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Going Concern Basis)

Six months ended June 30, 2012

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

	Common Stock					AdditionalPaid inCapital			AccumulatedDeficit			Total Stockholders’Equity
	Shares		Amount
Balance at December 31, 2010		61,690,977	$	93,107,905		$	9,861,010		$	(70,891,787	)	$	32,077,128
Exercise of options		29,999		59,411			(21,022	)					38,389
Exercise of warrants		5,354,800		8,483,372									8,483,372
Reclassified from warrant liability				4,258,164									4,258,164
Reclassified to options liability							(1,025,463	)		169,804			(855,659	)
Issuance of common stock		2,758,620		3,166,057			844,488						4,010,545
Stock issuance cost				(316,449	)		(87,371	)					(403,820	)
Stock-based compensation expense							2,605,892						2,605,892
Net loss										(3,229,648	)		(3,229,648	)
Balance at December 31, 2011		69,834,396		108,758,460			12,177,534			(73,951,631	)		46,984,363
Options repurchased				(29,108	)								(29,108	)
Exercise of warrants
Reclassified from warrant liability
Reclassified to options liability							(188,466	)					(188,466	)
Issuance of common stock
Stock issuance cost
Stock-based compensation expense							2,289,567						2,289,567
Net Income										28,858,180			28,858,180
Balance at June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)		69,834,396	$	108,729,352		$	14,278,635		$	(45,093,451	)	$	77,914,535

(Unaudited)


	Common Stock
	Shares		Amount			Additional Paid in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010		61,690,977		93,107,905			9,861,010			(70,891,787	)		32,077,128

Exercise of options		29,999		59,411			(21,022	)					38,389
Exercise of warrants		5,354,800		8,483,372			—						8,483,372
Reclassified from warrant liability				4,258,164			—						4,258,164
Reclassified to options liability							(1,025,463	)		169,804			(855,659	)
Issuance of common stock		2,758,620		3,166,057			844,488						4,010,545
Stock issuance cost				(316,449	)		(87,371	)					(403,820	)
Stock-based compensation expense							2,605,892						2,605,892
Net loss							—			(3,229,648	)		(3,229,648	)

Balance at December 31, 2011		69,834,396	$	108,758,460		$	12,177,534		$	(73,951,631	)	$	46,984,363

Options repurchased				(29,108	)								(29,108	)
Exercise of warrants													—
Reclassified from warrant liability													—
Reclassified to options liability							(188,467	)					(188,467	)
Issuance of common stock													—
Stock issuance cost													—
Stock-based compensation expense							2,289,568						2,289,568
Net Income										28,858,180			28,858,180

Balance at June 30, 2012 (Unaudited)		69,834,396	$	108,729,352		$	14,278,635		$	(45,093,451	)	$	77,914,536

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Nets Assets in Liquidation as of September 30, 2012 (Liquidation Basis)

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)


Net Assets in Liquidation as of June 30, 2012	$	77,914,535
Increase(decrease) to net assets

Investment income from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012		51,292
Tax Adjustment from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012		1,019,447
Adjustments to assets from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012		(21,729	)
Adjustments to Liquidation accruals from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012		(134,721	)
Costs incurred from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012		(85,255	)

Net increase to net assets		829,034

Net Assets in Liquidation as of September 30, 2012	$	78,743,569

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~(Expressed ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~U.S. ~~and~~dollars) ~~2011~~

1	Description of the Business

NiMin Energy Corp. (the “Company” or “NiMin”) was incorporated under the name NiMin Capital Corp. under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) on May 31, 2007. The Company changed its name to NiMin Energy Corp. on September 3, 2009, and consolidated its shares on the basis of one new post-consolidation share (“Common ~~Share~~ Shares”) for each three existing common shares.

The principal business of the Company iswas conducted through its wholly owned subsidiary, Legacy Energy, Inc. (“Legacy”), a Delaware corporation that was engaged in the exploration, development, and production of crude oil and natural gas properties in the states of California and Wyoming, until the sale, of its assets in June 2012.

The annual and special meeting (the “Special Meeting”) of holders (“Shareholders”) of common shares of the Company (“Common Shares”) was held on June 26, 2012. At the Special Meeting, in addition to annual items of business, shareholders were asked to consider and vote on, among other things, special resolutions approving: ~~(i)~~ the proposed sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (the “Sale of Assets”) including those assets held by NiMin’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy pursuant to purchase and sale agreements with respect to its Wyoming based assets and California based assets.

At the Special Meeting, the ~~shareholders~~Shareholders were also asked to consider and vote on the voluntary winding up and dissolution of the Company pursuant to the laws of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) (the “Winding Up “”) and the distribution to ~~shareholders~~Shareholders of the net proceeds of the Sale of Assets (less the settlement of obligations of Legacy,) and cash on hand, as part of such liquidation and dissolution after satisfaction of all liabilities of the Company, by way of a reduction of the stated capital of the ~~common~~Common ~~shares~~Shares of the Company.

Both the Sale of Assets and the Winding Up were approved by the ~~shareholders~~Shareholders at the Special Meeting. Legacy is a wholly owned subsidiary of NiMin and therefore, in order for the Company to complete the Winding Up, the appropriate corporate steps must also occur for the dissolution and liquidation of Legacy. Pursuant to the approval of the Sale of Assets, Legacy proceeded with the sale of the Wyoming oil and gas assets and the California oil and gas assets all as more particularly described below.

On June 28, 2012, Legacy completed its previously announced sale of its assets in Wyoming’s Big Horn Basin (the “Wyoming Assets”) to BreitBurn Operating L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BBEP “BreitBurn”), for total cash consideration of approximately $93 million, being the original purchase price of approximately $98 million less approximately $5 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustments. On August 30, 2012, Legacy completed its final settlement with BreitBurn and received approximately $2.3 million based on the final purchase price adjustments.

On June 29, 2012, Legacy completed its previously announced sale of its assets in California’s San Joaquin Basin (the “California Assets”) to Southern San Joaquin Production, LLC for total cash consideration of approximately $26 million, being the original purchase price of approximately $27 million, less approximately $1 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustments. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, $3 million of the $26 million purchase price paid on closing has been deposited with an escrow agent through December 31, 2012 in connection with various indemnities contained therein. On August 30, 2012, Legacy completed its final settlement with Southern San Joaquin Production LLC and received $347,938 based on the final purchase price adjustments.

The Winding Up and the dissolution and liquidation of Legacy contemplates the orderly disposition of the assets, the orderly discharge of all outstanding liabilities, including all outstanding debt, and after the establishment of appropriate reserves, the distribution of cash to shareholders in installments.

~~Upon~~9 completion of the Sale of the Wyoming Assets and California Assets as described further below, the disposition of all remaining assets of Legacy and the settlement of all liabilities of the Company and Legacy, the Company intends to distribute the net proceeds of the liquidation and dissolution of both Legacy and the Company to shareholders in one or more distribution installments.

OnNiMin ~~June 29,~~Energy 2012, Legacy completed its previously announced sale of its assets in California’s San Joaquin Basin (the “California Assets”) to Southern San Joaquin Production, LLC for total cash consideration of approximately US$26 million, being the original purchase price of approximately US$27 million, less approximately US$1 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustmentsCorp. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, US$3 million of the US$26 million purchase price paid on closing has been deposited with an escrow agent through December 31, 2012 in connection with various indemnities contained therein.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

Upon completion of the disposition of all remaining assets of Legacy and the settlement of all liabilities of the Company and Legacy, the Company intends to distribute the net proceeds of the liquidation and dissolution of both Legacy and the Company to shareholders in multiple distribution installments.

On September 24, 2012, the Company’s board of directors declared an initial distribution to Shareholders of $1.01 per Common Share. The distribution will be made as a return of capital to Shareholders of record at the close of business on October 9, 2012, and the stated capital of the Company will be reduced accordingly. The distribution will be payable on October 22, 2012. On September 28, 2012, the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) determined that its “Due Bill” trading procedures will apply to the initial distribution to Shareholders.

Pursuant to the TSX’s “Due Bill” trading procedures, trades of Common Shares entered into from and including October 4, 2012 until and including October 22, 2012 will have a Due Bill attached which will allow the purchaser to receive the initial distribution instead of the seller, even if such trades are settled after the October 9, 2012 record date. Thus, any trades that are executed during the Due Bill process will be automatically flagged to ensure that purchasers receive the entitlement and sellers do not.

Investors who enter into trades to purchase Common Shares on or after the ex-distribution date of October 23, 2012 will not be entitled to the distribution. The Due Bills will be redeemed on October 25, 2012 once all trades with attached Due Bills entered into up to October 22, 2012 have settled.

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, dissolved in accordance with the laws of Delaware on September 17, 2012.

2	Basis of Presentation

The unaudited interim financial information of the Company has been prepared in accordance with Article 10 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s, or the SEC, Regulation S-X. Accordingly, it does not include all of the information required by generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or U.S. GAAP, for complete financial statements. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011, was derived from the audited financial statements at that date and does not include all the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial information contains all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements of interim periods. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, or the 2011 10-K. Operating results for any interim period, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

8As a result of the Shareholders’ approval of the Winding Up of the Company, the liquidation basis of accounting was adopted effective June 30, 2012. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of a company is imminent and the net realizable values of assets are reasonably determinable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts. Further, all costs of liquidation are accrued as of September 30, 2012. Financial information presented as of and subsequent to June 30, 2012, includes a Consolidated Statement of Net Assets and a Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation, as required under the liquidation basis of accounting. Financial information included for periods ending prior to June 30, 2012, is presented under the going concern basis of accounting. Therefore, financial information presented as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2012, is not comparable to financial information presented for prior periods.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~(Expressed ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~U.S. ~~and~~dollars) ~~2011~~

~~financial~~Given ~~statements~~that ofthe ~~interim~~respective ~~periods.~~property ~~These~~sales ~~unaudited~~transactions ~~consolidated~~closed ~~financial~~on ~~statements~~June 28, ~~should~~2012 beand June 29, ~~read~~2012, inthe ~~conjunction~~associated ~~with~~revenues ~~the~~are ~~Company’s~~included ~~Annual~~in ~~Report~~revenues onand ~~Form~~expenses ~~10-K~~ for the ~~year~~period ended ~~December~~ June 3130, ~~2011~~2012. However, orthe purchase and sale agreements provide adjustments to the ~~2011~~purchase ~~10-K.~~price ~~Operating~~be ~~results~~made ~~for~~related ~~any~~to ~~interim~~revenues and operating expenses for the period of April 1, ~~are~~2012 ~~not~~through ~~necessarily~~the ~~indicative~~closing date of the ~~results~~sale ~~that~~of ~~may~~the beproperties. ~~expected~~As such, the purchase price of the sale of the properties in June 2012 was adjusted for revenues and operating expenses for the ~~full~~period ~~year~~of April 1 through closing date of the sale of the properties.

AsThese aunaudited ~~result~~interim ofconsolidated ~~the~~financial ~~shareholders’~~statements ~~approval~~ of the ~~Winding Up of the~~ Company, the liquidation basis of accounting was adopted effective June 30, 2012. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of a company is imminent and the net realizable values of assets are ~~reasonably~~presented ~~determinable.~~in ~~Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts~~U.S ~~Further, all costs of liquidation are accrued as of June 30, 2012~~dollars.

~~Given~~The ~~that~~conversion ~~the respective~~to ~~property~~liquidation ~~sales~~basis ~~transactions~~of ~~closed~~accounting onrequires ~~June~~management ~~28,~~to ~~2012~~make significant ~~and~~estimates ~~June 29, 2012, the associated revenues during the quarter are included in revenues~~ and ~~expenses for the period ending June 30, 2012~~judgments. ~~However,~~In ~~the~~order ~~purchase and sale agreements provide adjustments~~ to ~~the~~record ~~purchase~~assets ~~price~~at beestimated ~~made~~net ~~related~~realizable tovalue ~~revenues~~ and ~~operating~~liabilities ~~expenses~~at ~~for~~estimated ~~the~~settlement ~~period~~amounts ofunder ~~April 1, 2012 through~~ the ~~closing~~liquidation ~~date~~basis of ~~the sale of the properties. As such~~accounting, the ~~purchase~~Company ~~price~~recorded of the ~~sale~~following ofadjustments ~~the~~to ~~properties~~record ~~in June 2012, have~~its ~~been~~assets ~~adjusted~~at ~~for~~net ~~revenues~~realizable ~~and~~value ~~operating~~as ~~expenses for the period~~ of ~~April~~September 30, ~~1 through closing date of the sale of the properties~~2012.

The conversion to liquidation basis of accounting required management to make significant estimates and judgments. In order to record assets at estimated net realizable value and liabilities at estimated settlement amounts under the liquidation basis of accounting, the Company recorded the following adjustments to record its assets at net realizable value as of June 30, 2012, the date of adoption of the liquidation basis of accounting:


Adjust assets to net realizable value:
Write down of fixed assets (i)	$	(82,731	)
Write off of other assets		(152,070	)

Total as of June 30, 2012	$	(234,801	)

Adjust assets to net realizable value:
Write off of other assets		(21,729	)

Total as of September 30, 2012	$	(256,530	)

	As of June 30,2012
Adjust assets and liabilities to net realizable value:
Write down of fixed assets (i)	$	82,731
Write off of other assets	$	152,070
Total	$	234,801

(i)

Assets relating to the CMD technology were written down to the realizable value within general and administrative expenses.

(i) Assets relating to the CMD technology were written down to the net realizable value of zero within general and administrative expenses.

Accrued Cost of Liquidation

Under the liquidation basis of accounting, the Company has accrued for the estimated costs to be incurred in liquidation, as follows:

	As of June 30,2012
Accrued Liquidation Costs	Balances asof June 30,2012		Adjustmentsto accrual			Payments			Balances as ofSeptember 30,2012
Lease obligation	$	62,943	$	—		$	(62,943	)	$	—
Professional fees		3,964,723		812,144			(2,799,871	)		1,976,996
Payroll related costs		3,009,757		34,222			(3,043,979	)		—
Other		500,000		(113,436	)		(158,327	)		228,237
Total	$	7,537,423	$	732,930		$	(6,065,120	)	$	2,205,233

The Company will continue to incur operating costs and receive income on its cash investments from June 30, 2012 through the liquidation of the Company (the “Liquidation Period”). On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a significant impact on our reported net assets in liquidation based on the most recent information available to us, and when necessary make changes accordingly. Actual costs and income may differ from our estimates, which might reduce net assets available in liquidation to be distributed to ~~shareholders~~Shareholders.

~~The~~11 Winding Up and the dissolution and liquidation of Legacy continue to be assessed and the exact amount and timing of any initial and subsequent distributions to shareholders can only be determined upon completion of the orderly disposition of assets and orderly discharge of all liabilities. Once management of the Company have completed those required steps, current estimates will be revised to reflect actual numbers. The numbers reflected in the balance sheet and the estimated $1.12 net assets in liquidation per outstanding share include management estimates made as of June 30, 2012 and do not necessarily reflect the final dollars that may be available to the Company for distribution to shareholders. Any distribution amounts can only be calculated upon completion of all the dispositions, discharges and determinations of reserves. The amounts to be reserved will be based on a determination by the board of directors, derived from consultation with management and outside experts, if the board of directors determines that it is advisable to retain such experts, and a review of, among other things, estimated contingent costs of the Winding Up and the dissolution and liquidation of Legacy.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~(Expressed ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~U.S. ~~and~~dollars) ~~2011~~

~~These~~The ~~unaudited~~Winding ~~interim~~Up ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~dissolution and liquidation of Legacy continue to be assessed and the exact amount and timing of distributions to shareholders can only be determined upon completion of the orderly disposition of assets and orderly discharge of all liabilities. Once management of the Company ~~are~~have ~~presented~~completed those required steps, current estimates will be revised to reflect actual numbers. The numbers reflected in Uthe balance sheet and the estimated $1.S13 net assets in liquidation per outstanding share include management estimates made as of September 30, 2012 and do not necessarily reflect the final dollars that may be available to the Company for distribution to shareholders. Any distribution amounts can only be calculated upon completion of all the dispositions, discharges and determinations of reserves. The amounts to be reserved will be based on a determination by the board of directors, derived from consultation with management and outside experts, if the board of directors determines that it is advisable to retain such experts, and a review of, among other things, estimated contingent costs of the Winding Up and the dissolution and liquidation of Legacy. The estimated $1.13 net assets in liquidation per outstanding share has not been reduced for the initial distribution of $1.01 per Common Share declared by the board of directors on September 24, 2012, payable on October 22, 2012 to Shareholders of record on October 9, 2012.

3	Restricted Investments

Restricted Investments at ~~June~~ September 30, 2012 relate ~~primarily~~ to approximately $~~928~~853,002 held in bonds for the right to operate in the states of California and Wyoming. Management is currently working with the respective state agencies to reléase the bonds. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement for the California Assets, US$3 million of the ~~US$26 million~~ purchase price paid on closing has been deposited in escrow and is required to be held by the escrow agent through December 31, 2012 until various indemnities contained in the purchase and sale agreement have been fulfilled. The funds held by the escrow agent are invested in a money market account.

4	Senior Loan

On June 30, 2010, the Company entered into a senior secured loan (the “Senior Loan”) in the amount of $36 million from a U.S. based institutional private lender (the “Lender”). The Company borrowed $36 million subject to an original issuer discount of 7.5%, a commitment fee of 1%, a placement fee of 1% and a transaction fee of 3%. Debt issuance costs of $4.9 million were incurred and were being amortized to net income under the effective interest method. The Senior Loan had a 12.5% fixed interest rate and a term of five years. Interest was payable quarterly beginning September 30, 2010.

As part of the Winding Up of the Company, on June 28, 2012, the Company prepaid the entire amount of the Senior Loan and as a result, a prepayment penalty of 2% representing $707,705 was applied in addition to the accrued interest of $1,118,853 and principal of $36,000,000. The remaining unamortized debt issuance cost of $3.23 million as of June 28, 2012, related to the Senior Loan, was written off and is included in ~~current~~the period ended June 30, 2012 interest expense.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

5	Share Capital

Authorized and Outstanding

Common Shares

NiMin is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, 69,834,396 Common Shares were issued and outstanding.

Preferred Shares

NiMin is also authorized to issue an unlimited number of Preferred Shares issuable in series. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, no Preferred Shares have been issued.

Stock Option Plan

The Company established a stock option plan as approved by the shareholders whereby options to purchase Common Shares may be granted to the Company’s directors, officers, employees and consultants. The exercise prices of stock options are denominated in Canadian dollars. The number of Common Shares issuable under the Company’s stock option plan cannot exceed 15% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and the option has a maximum life of ten years. The vesting period is determined by the Board of Directors at the time of grant. Options issued by the Company generally vest one-third on the first, second, and third anniversary of the date of grant. Following the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, all outstanding unvested options became automatically vested and the Company recognized the remaining grant date fair value of approximately $1.7 million in the ~~current~~ period. ended June 30, 2012

10Pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Company’s stock option plan, the Company completed the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and, as such, terminated all unexercised options under the plan in July of 2012.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the stock option activity for the period ended September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:


	Number of shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price (CDN$)
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010		7,355,000			1.25

Options exercised ⁽ⁱ⁾		(29,999	)		1.25
Options forfeited		(105,000	)		1.64
Options issued		2,000,000			1.44

Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2011 ⁽ⁱⁱ⁾		9,220,001			1.24

Options exercised
Options forfeited		(60,000	)		1.61
Options repurchased		(600,000	)		1.00
Options cancelled		(8,560,001	)		1.29

Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2012 ⁽ⁱⁱ⁾		—			—

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~(Expressed ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~U.S. ~~and~~dollars) ~~2011~~

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the stock option activity for the period ended June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:

	Number of shares			WeightedAverage ExercisePrice (CDN$)
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010		7,355,000			1.25
Options exercised (i)		(29,999	)		1.25
Options forfeited		(105,000	)		1.64
Options issued		2,000,000			1.44
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2011 (ii)		9,220,001			1.24
Options exercised
Options forfeited		(60,000	)		1.61
Options repurchased		(600,000	)		1.00
Options issued
Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2012 (ii)		8,560,001		$	1.29

(i)

The intrinsic value of the exercised options during 2011 was CDN $33,299.

(ii) The 2.70 million stock options relating to former employees were modified upon transition to a consulting role in 2011 and first quarter of 2012 to allow for continued vesting. The resulting $310,309 and $104,483 was recognized as incremental stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2011 and the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, respectively. As the related options are denominated in Canadian dollars, which is not the functional currency of the Company (which is the U.S. dollar), the vested options are classified as a liability on the balance sheet and recorded at their fair value at the end of each period and the change in fair value is recognized in earnings.

Following the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, the respective option liabilities described above were fair valued to zero with $296,519 recorded as a credit to the change in the fair value of options.

At June 30, 2012, stock options to purchase Common Shares were exercisable as follows:

		Number of Options Outstanding				Exerciseable				WeightedAverageExercise Price(CDN$)				AverageContractualLife(Years)
			8,560,001				8,560,001			$	1.29				6.58

(i) The average contractual life represents the original remaining contractual life as of June 30, 2012. Subsequent to quarter end, all outstanding options were cancelled as discussed in Note 8.

During the current quarter, due to the Winding Up of the Company, the Company valued the outstanding stock options

based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate on the valuation of the underlying equity instruments as of June 30, 2012. As the stock options have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the stock options was determined to approximate zero.

As of June 30, 2012, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s option plan.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012 and 2011

	Number of UnvestedOptions			Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Valueper Option(CDN$)
Balance December 31, 2010		4,933,333			1.25
Vested		(2,744,990	)		1.22
Granted		2,000,000			0.66
Forfeited		(105,000	)		0.95
Balance December 31, 2011		4,083,343			0.99
Vested		(4,023,343	)		0.99
Granted		—			—
Forfeited		(60,000	)		0.94
Balance June 30, 2012		—

When stock options are exercised, the Company issues common shares from the pool of authorized shares.

Warrants

Each warrant is exercisable by the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share at any time before the expiration date, after which time the warrants expire and become null and void.

Each whole ~~U.S.~~warrant ~~Warrant~~ issued in connection with the ~~Private~~private ~~Placement~~placement is exercisable for a period of 36 months from September 1, 2011, at an exercise price of ~~USD~~ $1.60. The ~~U.S.~~warrants ~~Warrants~~ were subject to a hold period of four months plus one day from the date of issue.

~~The~~As ~~following~~a ~~table~~result ~~sets~~of ~~forth~~the aapproval ~~reconciliation~~ of the ~~warrant~~Winding ~~activity~~Up ~~for~~of the ~~periods~~Company ~~ended~~in July ~~June 30,~~ 2012, ~~and~~an ~~December 31~~aggregate of 2,188,970 ~~2011:~~unexercised warrants were terminated.

	Number of Warrants			EquityComponentAmount		WeightedAverage ExercisePrice(CDN$)
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010		12,349,341			—		1.58
Warrants exercised		(5,354,800	)		—		1.55
Warrants expired		(6,087,951	)		—		1.55
Warrants issued (i)		1,379,310			844,488		1.65
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011		2,285,900			844,488		1.79
Warrants exercised		—			—		—
Warrants expired		—			—		—
Warrants issued		—			—		—
Warrants outstanding at June 30, 2012		2,285,900			844,488	$	1.79

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the warrant activity for the periods ended September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:

(i) The weighted average exercise price of the U.S. Warrants is USD$1.60 and is herein expressed in Canadian dollar equivalent using the closing foreign exchange rate at December 31, 2011.


	Number of Warrants			Equity Component Amount			Weighted Average Exercise Price (CDN$)
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010		12,349,341			—			1.58

Warrants exercised		(5,354,800	)		—			1.55
Warrants expired		(6,087,951	)		—			1.55
Warrants issued⁽ⁱ⁾		1,379,310			844,488			1.65

Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011		2,285,900			844,488			1.79

Warrants exercised		—			—			—
Warrants expired		—			—			—
Warrants cancelled		(2,188,970	)		(844,488	)		1.79

Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2012		96,930			—			1.72

~~During~~14 second quarter of 2012, pursuant to the Winding Up of the Company, the Company valued the warrants based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate on the valuation of the underlying equity instruments as of June 30, 2012. As the warrants have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the warrants were determined to approximate zero.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~(Expressed ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~U.S. ~~and~~dollars) ~~2011~~

(i) The ~~following~~weighted ~~table~~average ~~summarizes~~exercise ~~NiMin’s~~price of the warrants ~~exercisable~~is $1.60 and is herein expressed in Canadian dollar equivalent using the closing foreign exchange rate at ~~June 30~~December 31, ~~2012:~~ 2011.

Expiration Date	Number of Warrants		ExercisePrice per share(CDN$)
March 10, 2016		581,590		1.72
October 15, 2017		325,000		2.48
September 1, 2014 (i)		1,379,310		1.60
		2,285,900	$	1.79

During second and third quarters of 2012, pursuant to the Winding Up of the Company, the Company valued the warrants based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate on the valuation of the underlying equity instruments as of June 30, 2012. As the warrants have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the warrants were determined to approximate zero.

~~(i)~~ The ~~weighted~~following ~~average~~table ~~exercise~~summarizes ~~price~~NiMin’s ofwarrants ~~the~~exercisable ~~U.S. Warrants is USD $1.60 and is herein expressed in Canadian dollar equivalent using the closing foreign exchange rate~~ at September 30, ~~2011.~~2012:


Expiration Date	Number of Warrants		Exercise Price per share (CDN$)
March 10, 2016		96,930		1.72

		96,930		1.72

Per Share Amounts

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share are calculated using the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect of the stock options. The treasury stock method assumes that the proceeds received from the exercise of “in the money” stock options and warrants are used to repurchase commons shares at the average market price during the period. The weighted average number of shares assumed to be outstanding was as follows:

	Three months endedJune 30,				Six months endedJune 30,
	Six months endedJune 30,		Three months endedSeptember 30,		Nine months endedSeptember 30,
	2012		2011		~~2012~~2011			~~2011~~
Net income (loss)	$	3028,~~398~~858,~~632~~180	$	3,~~830~~642,~~824~~012	$	28(1,~~858~~004,~~180~~377	)	$	~~(4,646,389~~	)
Basic and diluted shares outstanding (i)		69,834,396		6667,~~737~~851,~~876~~314		6966,~~834~~407,~~396~~689			~~65,685,876~~
Income (loss) per basic and diluted share	$	0.4441	$	0.0605	$	(0.4102	)	$	~~(0.07~~	)

(i) For the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, 2012, 10.8 million stock options and warrants were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, 8,120,001 stock options and warrants were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation. Potential common shares from the exercise of stock options and warrants were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation because their effect was anti-dilutive as a result of the options and warrants being out of the money for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, and the Company’s net loss for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

615 ~~Income Taxes~~

At June 30, 2012, the Company had estimated an income tax liability of $2,478,263 relating to taxable gains resulting from the sale of its oil and gas properties in the current period. The difference between the federal tax statutory rate of 35% and the effective tax rate of 7.9% is due to the current tax liability being offset by deferred tax assets of $23,634,056 related to the net operating loss carryforwards that were previously subject to full valuation allowance.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~(Expressed ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~U.S. ~~and~~dollars) ~~2011~~

6	Income Taxes

At September 30, 2012, the Company had estimated an alternative minimum income tax liability of $1,458,816, for Federal and California purposes, relating to taxable gains resulting from the sale of its oil and gas properties in the current period. The Federal taxable income for regular income tax purposes was fully reduced by net operating loss carryforwards of $64,276,981. The Company’s deferred tax assets were previously subject to full valuation allowance.

7	Financial Instruments

Fair Value

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, restricted investments, warrants, short-term debt, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. For all periods presented, the fair value of the commodity derivative was obtained from the counterparty and therefore was considered level 2. Due to the pending liquidation, the Company valued the warrants based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate on the valuation of the underlying equity instruments as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. As the warrants have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the warrants are determined to approximate zero.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company’s receivables from joint venture partners and from crude oil and natural gas marketers.

The majority of the Company’s receivables are within the oil and gas industry, primarily from its ~~industry~~ industry partners. The receivables are not collateralized. To date, the Company has experienced minimal bad debts, and has no allowance for doubtful accounts. The majority of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held by two financial institutions, one in the U.S. and the other in Canada. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the accounts receivable balances are primarily all from the sale of oil and gas and post-close adjustments from the sale of its oil and ~~gas~~ gas properties. All receivables are current and therefore, no provision was determined to be required.

Our hedging transactions expose us to risk of financial loss if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract. We use master agreements which allow us, in the event of default, to elect early termination of all contracts with the defaulting counterparty. If we choose to elect early termination, all asset and liability positions with the defaulting counterparty would be net settled at the time of election. We also monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparty on an ongoing basis. We are unable to predict sudden changes in a counterparty’s creditworthiness or ability to perform. Even if we do accurately predict sudden changes, our ability to negate the risk may be limited depending upon market conditions. If the creditworthiness of our counterparty, deteriorates and results in its nonperformance, we could incur a significant loss.

The adoption of derivatives legislation or regulations related to derivative contracts could have an adverse impact on our ability to hedge risks associated with our business. Recent legislation on certain transactions involving derivatives may affect the use of derivatives in hedging transactions.

Some of our customers may be experiencing, or may experience in the future, severe financial problems that have had or may have a significant impact on their creditworthiness. We cannot provide assurance that one or more of our customers will not default on their obligations to us or that such a default or defaults will not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position. Furthermore, the bankruptcy of one or more of our customers, or some other similar proceeding or liquidity constraint, might make it unlikely that we would be able to collect all or a significant portion of amounts owed by the distressed entity or entities.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, 100% of the Company’s production was sold to two customers, Plains Marketing LP and Marathon Oil Company. However, the Company does not believe that the loss of a purchaser would materially affect the Company’s business because there are numerous purchasers in the area in which the Company sells its production. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, purchases by the following companies exceeded 10% of the total oil and gas revenues of the Company.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2012 and 2011

	For the three months endedJune 30,				For the six months endedJune 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Plains Marketing LP	$	1,503,418	$	728,983	$	3,334,125	$	1,726,249
Marathon Oil Company	$	3,333,545	$	2,614,860	$	7,651,465	$	6,133,684

Derivatives

Commodity price risk is the risk that the future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in commodity prices. Commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas are impacted by world economic events that dictate the levels of supply and demand.

In January of 2010, the Company entered into a derivative financial contract for 7,500 Bbls of NYMEX West Texas Intermediate (“NYMEX WTI”) crude oil production per month at a fixed rate of $85.10 per barrel until December 2012.

NiMin Energy Corp.

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

In December 2010, the Company entered into a derivative financial contract for 125 Bbls of oil per day for 2011 and 250 Bbls of oil per day for 2012 at a fixed rate of $90.40 per barrel.

In November 2011, the Company entered into a derivative financial contract for 100 Bbls of oil per day for 2012 at a fixed price of $96.75 per barrel.

At ~~March 31, 2012, the Company recognized $1.34 million as a derivative liability on crude oil derivative contracts. At~~ December 31, 2011, the Company recognized $976,929 as a derivative liability on crude oil derivative contracts.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, the Company’s change in derivative contracts included a realized gain of $~~875~~98,~~373.~~145 ~~For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company’s change in derivative contracts included a realized loss of $531,070~~ and an unrealized gain of $2.0369 million.

~~For~~During the ~~six months~~second ~~ended~~quarter ~~June 30,~~of 2012, the Company’s ~~change~~terminated inand settled all derivative contracts ~~included~~as ~~a realized gain~~ of ~~$189~~May 17,~~507.~~ ~~For~~2012, ~~the~~and ~~six months ended June~~at September 30, ~~2011~~2012, ~~the~~carried ~~Company’s~~no ~~change in derivative contracts included a realized loss of $776,863 and an unrealized loss of $356,446~~liability.

~~During~~For the ~~current~~six ~~quarter~~months ended June 30, 2012, the Company’s ~~terminated~~change ~~and~~in derivative ~~settled~~contracts ~~all~~included ~~derivative contracts~~a asrealized gain of ~~May 17~~$189,507. ~~2012,~~For ~~and~~the atnine ~~June~~months ended September 30, ~~2012~~2011, ~~carried~~the noCompany’s ~~liability~~change in derivative contracts included a realized loss of $875,009 and an unrealized gain of $2.33 million.

8	Subsequent Events

~~Pursuant~~On toOctober 10, ~~Section~~2012, ~~3.5 of~~ the Company’s ~~stock~~announced ~~option~~that ~~plan,~~its ~~the~~common ~~Company~~shares ~~completed~~will be voluntarily delisted from the ~~sale~~Toronto Stock ofExchange ~~all~~(“TSX”) orafter ~~substantially~~the ~~all~~close of trading on October 22, 2012 (the ~~Company~~ date on which NiMin’s ~~assets~~initial ~~and,~~distribution will be payable as ~~such~~announced on September 24, ~~terminated~~2012 ~~all~~and ~~unexercised~~further ~~options~~detailed ~~under~~on September 28, 2012) and its listing will be transferred to the ~~plan~~NEX, ina ~~July~~separate board of ~~2012.~~the ~~This~~TSX ~~event~~Venture ~~had~~Exchange, noeffective ~~impact~~as toof ~~the~~market ~~Company~~open on October 23, 2012. From and after October 23, 2012, NiMin’s ~~consolidated~~common ~~statement~~shares ofwill ~~net~~trade ~~assets~~on the NEX under the symbol “NNN.H”.

As17 a result of the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, management terminated 2,188,970 unexercised warrants outstanding at June 30, 2012. This event had no impact to the Company’s consolidated statement of net assets.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended from time to time, (“Annual Report”) and filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 14, 2012, our interim consolidated financial statements for the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011, and our historical consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

In this MD&A, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in US Dollars (“$”).

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT

This MD&A may include certain statements and information that may be deemed to be “forward -looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, which may include, but which are not limited to, statements with respect to the objectives, financial conditions, results of operations and business of the Company. The use of any of the words “expect” , “anticipate”, “ continue”, “should”, “will” “believe” “plan” “intend” “ongoing” “estimate” “may” “project” or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements may also be in respect of operating costs, general and administrative expenses, applicable and future tax liabilities, contractual obligations, the proposed distributions to shareholders, the dissolution and liquidation of both Legacy or the Company, future plans, objectives and results. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Estimates and forward-looking statements are based on assumptions of future events and actual results may vary from these estimates. The actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the following risk factors and as set forth elsewhere in this MD&A: (i) timing and risks associated with the disposition of the remaining final assets and finalization and payment of remaining liabilities; (ii) timing ~~and risks~~ ~~associated with the finalization of outstanding statement of adjustments for the sale of the assets completed in June 2012; (iii) timing~~ and risks associated with the final steps in dissolution and wind up of Legacy and NiMin; (iviii) timing and risks associated with the initial and other distributions of cash to the shareholders of NiMin; (viv) other factors discussed under the heading “risks and uncertainties” and (viv) the factors discussed under “risk factors” in our Annual Report. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive. The forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein or in any other documents filed with Canadian or U.S. securities authorities whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Readers are cautioned that expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions used in the preparation of such forward-looking statements, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. The forward -looking statements are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

BOE Presentation

Barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas (“mcf”): one barrel of oil (“bbl”) is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

Overview

NiMin Energy Corp. (“NiMin”, “we” or the “Company”) iswas an oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, development and production of oil and gas properties in the United States. We have operated as an exploration and production company since late 2006, ~~and~~but ~~have~~as ~~principal~~of ~~operations~~June 30, ~~in the Bighorn Basin~~2012, ~~Wyoming~~we ~~and~~no ~~the~~longer ~~San~~have ~~Joaquin~~oil ~~Basin,~~and ~~California~~gas operations.

16The annual and special meeting (the “Special Meeting”) of holders (“Shareholders”) of common shares of the Company (“Common Shares”) was held on June 26, 2012. At the Special Meeting, in addition to annual items of business, shareholders were asked to consider and vote on, among other things, special resolutions approving the proposed sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (the “Sale of Assets”) including those assets held by NiMin’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy pursuant to purchase and sale agreements with respect to its Wyoming based oil and gas (“Wyoming Assets”) assets and California based oil and gas (“California Assets”) assets.

~~The~~At ~~annual~~the ~~and~~Special ~~special~~Meeting, ~~meeting (~~the ~~“Special~~shareholders ~~Meeting”)~~were ofalso ~~holders~~asked ~~(“Shareholders”)~~to ofconsider and vote on the voluntary liquidation ~~common~~and ~~shares~~dissolution of the Company ~~(“Common~~pursuant ~~Shares”)~~to ~~was~~the ~~held~~laws onof ~~June~~the ~~26,~~Business ~~2012.~~Corporations AtAct (Alberta) (the ~~Special~~“Winding ~~Meeting,~~Up in”) ~~addition~~and tothe ~~annual~~distribution ~~items~~to shareholders of ~~business,~~the ~~shareholders~~net ~~were~~proceeds ~~asked~~of tothe ~~consider~~Sale ~~and~~of ~~vote~~Assets ~~on,~~(less ~~among~~the ~~other~~settlement ~~things,~~of ~~special~~obligations ~~resolutions approving~~of ~~the~~Legacy,) ~~proposed~~and ~~sale~~cash ofon ~~all~~hand, oras ~~substantially~~part ~~all~~ of ~~the~~such ~~Company’s~~liquidation ~~assets~~and ~~(the~~dissolution ~~“Sale~~after satisfaction of ~~Assets”)~~all ~~including~~liabilities ~~those~~of ~~assets~~the ~~held~~Company, by ~~NiMin’s~~way ~~wholly-owned~~of ~~subsidiary,~~a ~~Legacy~~reduction ~~pursuant~~of tothe ~~purchase~~stated ~~and~~capital ~~sale~~of ~~agreements~~the ~~with~~common ~~respect~~shares toof ~~its Wyoming~~the ~~based assets and California based assets~~Company.

AtBoth the ~~Special~~Sale ~~Meeting,~~of ~~the~~Assets ~~shareholders were also asked to consider~~ and ~~vote on~~ the ~~voluntary~~ ~~winding~~Winding upUp ~~and~~were ~~dissolution~~approved ofby the ~~Company~~shareholders ~~pursuant~~at to the ~~laws~~Special ofMeeting. ~~the~~Legacy ~~Business~~is ~~Corporations~~a ~~Act~~wholly ~~(Alberta)~~owned ~~(the~~subsidiary ~~“Winding~~of UpNiMin “) and, therefore, ~~the~~in ~~distribution~~order tofor ~~shareholders of~~ the ~~net~~Company ~~proceeds~~to ofcomplete the ~~Sale~~Winding ofUp, ~~Assets (less~~ the ~~settlement~~appropriate ~~of obligations~~corporate ofsteps ~~Legacy,)~~must ~~and~~also ~~cash~~occur onfor ~~hand,~~the asdissolution ~~part~~and liquidation of ~~such~~Legacy. ~~liquidation~~Pursuant ~~and~~to ~~dissolution~~the ~~after~~approval ~~satisfaction~~ of ~~all~~the ~~liabilities~~Sale of ~~the Company~~Assets, byLegacy ~~way~~proceeded ofwith athe ~~reduction~~sale of the Wyoming ~~stated~~assets ~~capital~~and of the ~~common~~California ~~shares~~assets ofall ~~the~~as ~~Company~~more particularly described below.

~~Both~~On ~~the~~June 28, ~~Sale~~2012, ofLegacy ~~Assets~~completed ~~and~~its ~~the~~previously announced ~~Winding~~sale Upof ~~were~~its ~~approved~~Wyoming byassets ~~the~~to ~~shareholders~~BreitBurn atOperating ~~the Special Meeting~~L.P., ~~Legacy is~~ a wholly -owned subsidiary of ~~NiMin~~BreitBurn ~~and therefore,~~Energy inPartners ~~order~~L.P. (NASDAQ: BBEP “BreitBurn”), for ~~the~~total ~~Company~~cash toconsideration ~~complete~~of ~~the~~approximately ~~Winding~~$93 Upmillion, being the ~~appropriate~~original purchase ~~corporate~~price ~~steps~~of ~~must~~approximately ~~also~~$98 ~~occur~~million ~~for~~less ~~the~~approximately ~~dissolution~~$5 ~~and~~million ~~liquidation~~adjusted ofto ~~Legacy.~~account ~~Pursuant~~for topreliminary ~~the~~purchase ~~approval~~price ofadjustments. ~~the~~On ~~Sale~~August 30, ~~of Assets~~2012, Legacy ~~proceeded~~completed ~~with~~its ~~the~~final ~~sale~~settlement ofwith ~~the Wyoming~~BreitBurn ~~oil~~ and ~~gas~~received ~~assets~~approximately ~~and~~$2.3 million ~~the~~based ~~California~~on ~~oil~~the ~~and~~final ~~gas~~purchase ~~assets~~price ~~all as more particularly described below~~adjustments.

On June 29, 2012, Legacy completed its previously announced sale of its California assets to Southern San Joaquin Production, LLC for total cash consideration of approximately $26 million, being the original purchase price of approximately $27 million, less approximately $1 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustments. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, $3 million of the $26 million purchase price paid on closing has been deposited with an escrow agent through December 31, 2012 in connection with various indemnities contained therein. On August 30, 2012, Legacy completed its final settlement with Southern San Joaquin Production LLC and received $347,938 based on the final purchase price adjustments.

OnAs ~~June~~a 28result of the shareholders’ approval of the Winding Up of the Company, the liquidation basis of accounting was adopted effective June 30, 2012. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, ~~Legacy~~among ~~completed~~other ~~its~~things, ~~previously~~liquidation ~~announced~~of ~~sale~~a company is imminent and the net realizable values of ~~its~~assets are reasonably determinable. Under this basis of accounting, assets inare ~~Wyoming’s~~valued ~~Big Horn~~at ~~Basin~~their ~~(the~~net ~~“Wyoming~~realizable ~~Assets”)~~values toand ~~BreitBurn~~liabilities ~~Operating~~are Lstated at their estimated settlement amounts.P Further, all costs of liquidation are accrued as of September 30, 2012. Financial information presented as of and subsequent to June 30, 2012, includes a ~~wholly-owned~~Consolidated ~~subsidiary~~Statement of ~~BreitBurn~~Net ~~Energy~~Assets ~~Partners~~and ~~L.P.~~a ~~(NASDAQ:~~Consolidated ~~BBEP)~~Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation, as ~~for~~required ~~total~~under ~~cash~~the ~~consideration~~liquidation basis of ~~approximately~~accounting. ~~US$93~~Financial ~~million~~information included for periods ending prior to June 30, ~~being~~2012, is presented under the ~~original~~going ~~purchase~~concern ~~price~~basis of accounting. Therefore, financial information presented as of and for ~~approximately~~the ~~US$98~~3 ~~million~~months ~~less~~ended ~~approximately~~September 30, ~~US$5~~2012, ~~million~~is ~~adjusted~~not comparable to ~~account~~financial ~~for~~information ~~preliminary~~presented ~~purchase~~for ~~price~~prior ~~adjustments~~periods.

On ~~June 29~~September 24, 2012, ~~Legacy~~ ~~completed~~the ~~its~~Company’s ~~previously~~board ~~announced sale~~ of ~~its~~directors ~~assets~~declared inan ~~California’s~~initial ~~San~~distribution ~~Joaquin~~to ~~Basin~~shareholders ~~(the~~of ~~“California~~$1.01 ~~Assets”)~~per toCommon ~~Southern~~Share ~~San~~in ~~Joaquin~~connection ~~Production,~~with ~~LLC~~the ~~for~~winding ~~total~~up ~~cash~~of ~~consideration~~NiMin. ofThe ~~approximately~~distribution ~~US$26~~will ~~million,~~be ~~being~~made ~~the original~~as ~~purchase~~a ~~price~~return of ~~approximately~~capital ~~US$27~~to ~~million,~~shareholders ~~less~~of ~~approximately~~record ~~US$1~~at ~~million~~the close ~~adjusted~~of tobusiness ~~account~~on ~~for~~October 9, ~~preliminary~~2012, ~~purchase~~and ~~price~~the ~~adjustments.~~stated ~~Pursuant~~capital toof the ~~terms~~Company ofwill ~~the~~be ~~purchase~~reduced ~~and~~accordingly. ~~sale~~The ~~agreement,~~distribution ~~US$3~~will ~~million~~be ofpayable ~~the~~on ~~US$26~~October 22, ~~million purchase~~2012. ~~price~~On ~~paid~~September 28, on2012, ~~closing~~the ~~has~~Toronto ~~been~~Stock ~~deposited~~Exchange ~~with~~(“TSX”) determined anthat ~~escrow~~its ~~agent~~“Due ~~through~~Bill” ~~December~~trading ~~31,~~procedures ~~2012~~will inapply ~~connection~~to ~~with~~the ~~various~~initial ~~indemnities~~distribution ~~contained~~to ~~therein~~shareholders.

NiMin’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, dissolved in accordance with the laws of Delaware on September 17, 2012.

On October 10, 2012, NiMin announced that its common shares will be voluntarily delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) after the close of trading on October 22, 2012 (the date on which NiMin’s initial distribution will be payable and its listing will be transferred to the NEX, a separate board of the TSX Venture Exchange, effective as of market open on October 23, 2012. From and after October 23, 2012, NiMin’s common shares will trade on the NEX under the symbol “NNN.H”.

Oil and Gas Sales Report

Average daily production sold by region ⁽¹⁾

Three MonthsEnded June 30,2012

Three MonthsEnded June 30,2011

Six MonthsEnded June 30,2012

Six MonthsEnded June 30,2011

SixMonthsEndedJune30, 2012

Three MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2011

Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,2011

Louisiana (2)

Oil - Bbl/d

—

5768

—69

Gas - Mcf/d

—

~~457~~516

—514

~~517~~

Total Louisiana (boe/d)

—

~~133~~154

—155

~~152~~

California (3)

—

Oil - Bbl/d

~~228~~242

~~150~~249

~~242~~188

~~157~~

Gas - Mcf/d

—

Total California (boe/d)

~~228~~242

~~150~~249

~~242~~188

~~157~~

Wyoming (3)

—

Oil - Bbl/d

~~615~~652

~~647~~751

~~652~~686

~~652~~

Gas - Mcf/d

—

Total Wyoming (boe/d)

~~615~~652

~~647~~751

~~652~~686

~~652~~

Total Oil (Bbl/d)

~~843~~894

~~854~~1068

~~894~~943

~~875~~

Total Gas (Mcf)

—0

~~457~~516

—514

~~517~~

Total (boe/d)

~~843~~894

~~930~~1154

~~894~~1029

~~961~~

Notes:

(1)	These numbers are net to NiMin’s working interest for the relevant properties.

(2) The Louisiana producing properties were sold on December 1, 2011 (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”).

(3)	The Wyoming and California properties were sold on June 28, 2012 and June 29, 2012, respectively.

1720

Crude oil and natural gas sales

Given that the respective property sales transactions closed on June 28, 2012 and June 29, 2012, the associated revenues ~~during the quarter~~ are included in revenues and expenses for the period ending June 30, 2012. However, the purchase and sale agreements provide adjustments to the purchase price be made related to revenues and operating expenses for the period of April 1, 2012 through the closing date of the sale of the properties. As such, the purchase price of the sale of the properties in June 2012, ~~have~~was ~~been~~ adjusted for revenues and operating expenses for the period of April 1 through closing date of the sale of the properties.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, we recorded gross revenues of $68.0927 million~~, as compared to $7~~.39 ~~million~~For ~~for~~ the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2011.~~2012, ~~Oil~~we ~~sales~~recorded asgross arevenues ~~percentage~~ of ~~total revenue~~$13.78 ~~during the three months ended June 30~~million, ~~2012,~~ as compared to ~~the same period in 2011 increased from 98% to 100%. Oil volumes decreased by 2% to 843 barrels of oil per day (“Bopd”) and the price received decreased by 13% to~~ $8022.2332 ~~during~~million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012,~~2011. asGiven ~~compared to~~ the ~~same~~abovementioned ~~period~~sale ~~in 2011. All~~ of the Company’s ~~natural~~oil and gas ~~sales~~assets ~~are~~during ~~derived~~the ~~from~~second ~~its~~quarter ~~Louisiana~~of ~~properties. Effective December 1~~2012, ~~2011,~~ the Company ~~sold~~did ~~all~~not ofhave ~~its producing~~any ~~interest in Louisiana (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and no natural gas~~ sales ~~were~~during ~~recorded for~~ the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2012. The decrease in gross revenues for the three month ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period during 2011, is mainly due to lower average prices and a reduction in drilling efforts and work-overs in California and Wyoming.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded gross revenues of $13.78 million, as compared to $14.06 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Oil sales as a percentage of total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011 increased from 97% to 100%. Oil volumes increased by 2% to 894 Bopd and the price received decreased by 1% to $85.56 during the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011. All of the Company’s natural gas sales are derived from its Louisiana properties. Effective December 1, 2011, the Company sold all of its producing interest in Louisiana (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and no natural gas sales were recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in gross revenues for the six month ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period during 2011, is mainly due to lower average prices and a reduction in drilling efforts and work-overs in California and Wyoming.

Crude Oil Derivative Contracts

In January of 2010, the Company entered into a derivative financial contract for 7,500 Bbls of NYMEX West Texas Intermediate (“NYMEX WTI”) crude oil production per month at a fixed rate of $85.10 per barrel until December 2012.

On December 20, 2010, we agreed to economically hedge the future sales of 125 barrels of NYMEX WTI crude oil per day at a fixed price of $90.40 starting January 1, 2011, for a period of 12 months and 250 barrels of NYMEX WTI crude oil per day at a fixed price of $90.40 starting January 1, 2012, for a period of 12 months.

On November 11, 2011, we entered into a swap contract to minimize the variability in cash flows due to price movements in crude oil. We agreed to economically hedge the future sales of 100 barrels of NYMEX WTI crude oil per day at a fixed price of $96.75 starting January 1, 2012, for a period of 12 months.

AtWe ~~March 31,~~do ~~2012,~~not ~~the~~designate our ~~Company~~derivative ~~recognized~~financial ~~$1.34~~instruments ~~million~~as hedging instruments for accounting purposes and, as a ~~derivative~~result, ~~liability~~we onrecognize ~~crude~~the ~~oil~~current change in a derivative’s ~~contracts~~fair value in earnings. At December 31, 2011, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ recognized $976,929 as a derivative liability on crude oil derivative contracts.

WeFor dothe ~~not~~three ~~designate~~months ~~our~~ended ~~derivative financial instruments as hedging instruments for accounting purposes and~~September 30, ~~as a result~~2011, ~~we recognize~~ the ~~current~~ change in ~~a derivative’s fair value~~ in ~~earnings. At June 30, 2012, we recognized $0 as a~~ derivative ~~liability on crude oil derivative~~ contracts. Atincluded a ~~December 31,~~realized ~~2011,~~loss weof ~~recognized~~ $~~976~~98,~~929~~145 asand aan ~~derivative~~unrealized ~~liability~~gain onof ~~crude~~$2.69 ~~oil derivative contracts~~million.

~~For~~During the ~~three~~second ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~June 30,~~ 2012, the ~~change~~Company interminated and settled all derivative contracts ~~included~~as ~~a realized gain~~ of ~~$875~~May 17,~~373.~~ ~~For~~2012, ~~the three~~and ~~months~~at ~~ended June~~September 30, ~~2011~~2012, ~~the~~carried ~~change~~no ~~in derivative contracts included a realized loss of $531,070 and an unrealized gain of $2~~liability.03 ~~million.~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company’s change in derivative contracts included a realized gain of $189,507. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Company’s change in derivative contracts included a realized loss of $~~776~~875,~~863~~009 and an unrealized gain ~~loss~~ of $~~356,446~~2.33 million.

During the current quarter, the Company terminated and settled all derivative contracts as of May 17, 2012, and at June 30, 2012, carried no liability.

Royalties

California

WeIn ~~pay~~previous periods, the Company paid a crude oil production fee (“Production Fee”) consisting of 100% of the first 635.10 barrels of crude oil produced per month which commenced in 2008 and declines at a rate of 5.5% each year. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Production Fee rate was 506.40 barrels of oil per month. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Production Fee was 535.90 barrels of oil per month. During the same periods, we also paid an overriding royalty applicable after the Production Fee which for the three months ended June 30, 2012, averaged 28.48% and 30.27% for the same period in 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the overriding royalties averaged 28.23% and 28.91% for the same period in 2011.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, we recorded royalties in California in the amount of $~~598~~663,~~659~~587. asFor ~~compared~~the tosix ~~$454,039~~months ~~for~~ended ~~the~~June 30, ~~same~~2012, ~~period in~~we ~~2011.~~recorded ~~The~~royalties ~~increase~~ in ~~royalties~~California ~~during~~in the amount ~~three~~of ~~month~~$1.31 ~~ended June 30~~million, ~~2012,~~as iscompared ~~mainly due~~ to ~~higher~~$1.50 ~~oil~~million ~~production~~for ~~volumes~~the ~~and~~nine ~~realized~~months ~~commodity~~ended ~~prices~~September 30, 2011.

~~For~~21 the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded royalties in California in the amount of $1.31 million as compared to $840,888 for the same period in 2011. The increase in royalties during the three month ended June 30, 2012, is mainly due to higher oil production volumes and realized commodity prices.

Louisiana

Royalties related to Louisiana production varied by property. Effective December 1, 2011, the Company sold all of its producing interest in Louisiana (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and no royalties were recorded for the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, 2012. For the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we recorded $~~230~~732,~~663~~305 in royalties representing an ~~average rate of 31.34%. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $489,675 in royalties representing~~ an average rate of 30.8523%.

Wyoming

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, we recorded $~~651~~909,~~319~~732 in royalties in Wyoming representing an average rate of 1617.3457%,. asFor ~~compared~~the tosix ~~$996~~months ended June 30,~~932~~ or2012, ~~19.36%~~we ~~for~~recorded ~~the~~$1.47 ~~same~~million ~~period~~in royalties in ~~2011.~~Wyoming ~~The~~representing ~~decrease~~an inaverage ~~royalties~~rate isof 16.12%., ~~mainly~~as ~~due~~compared to ~~lower~~$2.68 ~~realized~~million ~~commodity~~or ~~prices~~18.22% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded $1.47 million in royalties in Wyoming representing an average rate of 16.12%, as compared to $1.79 million or 18.75% for the same period in 2011. The decrease in royalties is mainly due to lower realized commodity prices.

Operating Costs

Three monthsended June 30,2012

Three monthsended June 30,2011

Six monthsended June 30,2012

Six monthsended June 30,2011

Six monthsended June 30,2012

Three monthsendedSeptember 30,2011

Nine monthsendedSeptember 30,2011

($)

~~($)~~

Operating costs

24,~~140~~257,~~088~~619

23,~~907~~826,~~296~~968

48,~~257~~731,~~619~~503

~~4,904,535~~

Average operating costs per boe

2826.2045

3436.3504

2631.4510

~~28.19~~

Given that the respective property sales transactions closed on June 28, 2012 and June 29, 2012, the associated ~~revenues~~ revenues during the quarter are included in revenues and expenses for the period ending June 30, 2012. However, the purchase and sale agreements provide adjustments to the purchase price be made related to revenues and operating expenses for the period of ~~April~~ April 1, 2012, through the closing date of the sale of the properties. As such, the purchase price of the sale of the properties in June 2012, have been adjusted for revenues and operating expenses for the period of April 1 through closing date of the sale of the properties. For the three ~~month~~months ended ~~June~~ September 30, ~~2012~~2011, we incurred operating costs in the amount of $23.1483 million~~, as compared to $2~~.91 million for the same period in 2011. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred decreased operating costs as compared to the same period in 2011 mainly due to lower activity in the current period due to the pending sale transactions and higher production equipment rentals and contract labor expense in the previous year.

19For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred operating costs in the amount of $4.26 million, as compared to $8.73 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

~~Table~~Operating costs included severance taxes paid in Louisiana and Wyoming. There is no severance tax in the state of ~~Contents~~California. Severance taxes in Louisiana consist of 12.5% on gross oil sales and $0.164 per Mcf of gas sales. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded $654,996 in severance taxes. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded $996,327 in severance taxes, as compared to $1.73 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

For the six month ended June 30, 2012, we incurred operating costs in the amount of $4.26 million, as compared to $4.90 million for the same period in 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the decrease in operating costs as compared to the same period in 2011 is primarily related to the decrease in activity in the current period.

Operating costs included severance taxes paid in Louisiana and Wyoming. There is no severance tax in the state of California. Severance taxes in Louisiana consist of 12.5% on gross oil sales and $0.164 per Mcf of gas sales. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded $433,181 in severance taxes, as compared to $613,155 for the same period in 2011. The decrease in severance taxes during the three months ended June 30, 2012 is mainly due to lower production volumes and commodity prices. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded $996,327 in severance taxes, as compared to $1.12 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease in severance taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2012, is mainly due to lower production volumes and commodity prices.

General and Administrative Expenses (“G&A”)

Three monthsended June 30,2012

Three monthsended June 30,2011

Six monthsended June 30,2012

Six monthsended June 30,2011

Six monthsendedJune 30,2012

Three monthsendedSeptember 30,2011

Nine monthsendedSeptember 30,2011

($)

~~($)~~

G&A expense before stock-based compensation

23,~~177~~753,~~665~~693

~~938~~1,~~760~~306,526

34,~~753~~082,~~693~~524

~~2,775,998~~

Average per boe

2823.7032

1112.0931

2314.3254

~~15.96~~

Stock-based compensation (“SBC”)

12,~~745~~289,~~631~~567

~~637~~526,~~622~~990

21,~~289~~861,~~567~~058

~~1,334,068~~

Average per boe

2314.0122

74.5396

146.2263

~~7.67~~

G&A

36,~~923~~043,~~296~~260

1,~~576~~833,~~382~~516

65,~~043~~943,~~260~~582

~~4,110,066~~

Average per boe

5137.7055

1817.6327

3721.5517

~~23.63~~

For the ~~three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded G&A expense, excluding SBC, of $2.18 million, as compared to $938,760 for the same period in 2011. For the~~ six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded G&A expense, excluding SBC, of $3.75 million, as compared to $24.7808 million for the ~~same~~nine ~~period in 2011. This increase during the three and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012, is primarily due to higher legal and accounting costs related to the Winding Up of the Company~~2011.

~~Following the~~22 approval of the Winding Up of the Company, all outstanding unvested options became automatically vested and the Company recognized the remaining grant date fair value of approximately $1.7 million in the current period.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded SBC in the amount of $1.75 million, as compared to $637,622 for the same period in 2011. The increase in SBC for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, is due to all of the outstanding unvested options automatically vesting in the current period as a result of the approval of the Winding Up of the Company.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded SBC in the amount of $2.29 million, as compared to $1.33 million for the same period in 2011. The increase in SBC for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, is due to all of the outstanding unvested options automatically vesting in the current period as a result of the approval of the Winding Up of the Company.

	Three monthsended June 30,2012		Three monthsended June 30,2011		Six monthsended June 30,2012		Six monthsended June 30,2011
	($)		($)		($)		($)
Liquidation related expenses		7,537,423		—		7,537,423		—

~~For~~Following the ~~three~~approval ~~and~~of ~~six~~the ~~months~~Winding ~~ended~~Up ~~June 30,~~of ~~2012~~the Company, weall ~~recorded~~outstanding ~~liquidation~~unvested ~~related~~options ~~expenses~~became automatically ofvested ~~$7.54 million~~and ~~primarily~~the ~~comprising~~Company ofrecognized ~~accrued~~the ~~professional~~remaining ~~fees,~~grant ~~and~~date ~~severance~~fair ~~and~~value ~~payroll~~of ~~related~~approximately ~~payments~~$1.7 million in the current period.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded SBC in the amount of $2.29 million, as compared to $1.86 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Six months ended
June 30, 2012

Three months ended
September 30, 2011

Nine months ended
September 30, 2011

($)

Liquidation related expenses

7,537,423

—

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded liquidation related expenses of $7.54 million primarily comprising of accrued professional fees, and severance and payroll related payments.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Accretion Expense (“DD&A”)

Three monthsended June 30,2012

Three monthsended June 30,2011

Six monthsended June 30,2012

Six monthsended June 30,2011

Six months endedJune 30, 2012

Three months endedSeptember 30, 2011

Nine months endedSeptember 30, 2011

($)

~~($)~~

DD&A expense

~~799~~1,~~536~~697,361

~~778~~951,~~955~~079

12,~~697~~521,~~361~~067

~~1,569,988~~

Average per boe

10.5455

98.2096

108.5598

~~9.03~~

We follow the full-cost method of accounting and all costs included in proved properties and all future development costs along with our total proved reserves determine the period’s depletion cost.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, we ~~recorded~~ recorded DD&A in the amount of $~~799~~951,~~536 which was relatively consistent when compared to $778,955 for the same period in 2011~~079.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded DD&A in the amount of $1.68 million, as ~~which was relatively consistent when~~ compared to $12.5752 million for the ~~same~~nine ~~period~~months inended September 30, 2011.

Change in Fair Value of Warrants and Options

The exercise price of certain warrants is denominated in Canadian dollars which is not the functional currency of the Company. As a result, these warrants are classified as a liability on the balance sheet and recorded at their fair value at the end of each period and the change in fair value recognized in earnings.

During the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, none of the issued warrants were exercised, and due to the pending liquidation, the Company valued the warrants based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate of the value of the underlying equity instruments as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. As the warrants have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the warrants were determined to approximate zero. Further, a gain of $~~458,960 and $~~235,134 was recognized in earnings during the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, 2012~~, respectively~~.

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, ~~174~~333,~~800~~900 warrants were exercised and a total of 5,~~020~~354,~~900~~800 warrants were exercised during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. At ~~June~~ September 30, 2011, the fair value of the outstanding warrants was $~~2.82 million~~601,273, with a gain of $32.1808 million recognized in earnings during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and a ~~charge~~gain of $~~1.39~~689,799 ~~million~~ recognized in earnings during the nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. As a result of the approval of the Winding Up of the Company in July 2012, 2,188,970 unexercised warrants were terminated.

~~The~~23 exercise price of 2.70 million stock options relating to former employees that transitioned to a consulting role is denominated in Canadian dollars, which is not the functional currency of the Company (which is the U.S. dollar). As a result, the applicable 2.20 million vested options were classified as a liability on the balance sheet and recorded at their fair value at the end of each period with the change in fair value recognized in earnings. Following the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, all outstanding unvested options became automatically vested and the Company recognized the remaining grant date fair value of approximately $1.7 million in the current period.

As a result of the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, the Company valued the stock options based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate of the valuation of the underlying equity instruments as of June 30, 2012. As the stock options at June 30, 2012 have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the stock options were determined to approximate zero. Further, a gain of $562,542 and $296,519 was recognized in earnings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

The exercise price of 2.70 million stock options relating to former employees that transitioned to a consulting role is denominated in Canadian dollars, which is not the functional currency of the Company (which is the U.S. dollar). As a result, the applicable 2.20 million vested options were classified as a liability on the balance sheet and recorded at their fair value at the end of each period with the change in fair value recognized in earnings. Following the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, all outstanding unvested options became automatically vested and the Company recognized the remaining grant date fair value of approximately $1.7 million in the current period.

As a result of the approval of the Winding Up of the Company, the Company valued the stock options based on the expected cash distribution to shareholders as this represents management’s best estimate of the valuation of the underlying equity instruments as of June 30, 2012. As the stock options at June 30, 2012, have an exercise price greater than the expected cash distribution to shareholders, the value of the stock options were determined to approximate zero. Further, a gain of $296,519 was recognized in earnings during the six months ended June 30, 2012. In addition, all stock options were terminated at September 30, 2012.

Interest Income and Expense

For the ~~three~~ six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded interest expense of $56.0644 million ($3.2349 million non-cash) related to the Senior Loan (as define herein, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”), as compared to $14.3501 million ($~~230~~648,~~253~~ 125 non-cash) for the ~~same~~nine ~~period in 2011 related to the Senior Loan. For the six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we recorded interest expense of $6.44 million ($3.49 million non-cash) related to the Senior Loan (as define herein, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”), as compared to $2.63 million ($398,424 non-cash) for the same period in 2011 related to the Senior Loan.

As part of the Winding Up of the Company, on June 28, 2012, the Company prepaid the entire amount of the Senior Loan and as a result, a prepayment penalty of 2% representing $707,705 was applied on in addition to the accrued interest of $1,118,853 and principal of $36,000,000. The remaining unamortized debt issuance cost of $3.23 million related to the Senior Loan is included in current period interest expense.

For the ~~three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded interest income in the amount of $5,741 as compared to $14,542~~ ~~for the same period in 2011. For the~~ six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded interest income in the amount of $10,673, as compared to $2737,~~170~~501 for the ~~same~~nine ~~period in 2011. Lower interest income for the three and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~ ~~and~~ 2011 ~~is due to a reduction in average interest bearing cash balances and lower interest rates~~.

Income Tax

At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the Company had estimated an alternative minimum income tax liability of $~~2.48~~1,458,816, ~~million~~for Federal and California purposes, relating to taxable gains resulting from the sale of its oil and gas properties in the current period. The ~~estimated~~Federal taxable income for regular income tax ~~liability~~purposes was ~~curtailed~~fully reduced ~~from~~by ~~the~~net ~~$6.5~~operating ~~million~~loss tocarryforwards of $864,276,981.1 ~~million~~The ~~liability range provided at the~~ Company’s Special Meeting due to updated information including but not limited to, 2012 estimated tax losses and alternative minimum tax adjustments. Further, the difference between the federal tax statutory rate of 35% and the effective tax rate of 7.9% is due to the current tax liability being offset by deferred tax assets ~~related to the net operating loss carryforwards that~~ were previously subject to full valuation allowance.

Foreign Currency Exchange

Our foreign exchange expense is derived from our cash balances denominated in Canadian dollars. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011, we recorded a foreign exchange ~~loss~~gain of $~~0 as compared to $299 for the same period in 2011~~74,969. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded a foreign exchange loss of $438, as compared to a foreign exchange gain of $~~164~~239,~~589~~558 for the ~~same~~nine ~~period~~months inended September 30, 2011.

Operation’s Review

The following tables provide information regarding our capital expenditures incurred during the periods presented:

Capital Expenditures

	2012AmendedCapitalExpendituresBudget($000s)		Incurredthrough June 30,2012($000s)
Property Costs
- California				19
- Wyoming				24
Total Property Costs				43
Drilling/Workovers
- Louisiana
- California				172
- Wyoming		216		898
Total Drilling/Workovers		216		1,070
Facilities
- Louisiana
- California				63
- Wyoming		255		403
Total Facilities		255		466
Total Capital Budget		471		1,579

On April 24, 2012 and April 26, 2012, the Company signed definitive Purchase and Sale Agreements for the sale of its oil and gas assets in Wyoming and California. As a result, the 2012 Capital Expenditures Budget was amended. On June 28, 2012 and June 29, 2012, the Company completed its sale of its oil and gas properties in Wyoming and California respectively.

Through June 30, 2012, the Company incurred approximately $1.58 million of capital expenditures, of which $378,698 related to net capital related charges included in post close adjustments with the respective buyers of the Company’s oil and gas properties.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sale of Assets and Winding Up

The annual and special meeting (the “Special Meeting”) of holders (“Shareholders”) of common shares of the Company (“Common Shares”) was held on June 26, 2012. At the Special Meeting, in addition to annual items of business, shareholders were asked to consider and vote on, among other things, special resolutions approving the proposed sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (the “Sale of Assets”) including those assets held by NiMin’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy pursuant to purchase and sale agreements with respect to its Wyoming based assets and California based assets.

At the Special Meeting, the shareholders were also asked to consider and vote on the voluntary winding up and dissolution of the Company pursuant to the laws of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) (the “Winding Up “) and the distribution to shareholders of the net proceeds of the Sale of Assets (less the settlement of obligations of Legacy,) and cash on hand, as part of such liquidation and dissolution after satisfaction of all liabilities of the Company, by way of a reduction of the stated capital of the common shares of the Company.

Both the Sale of Assets and the Winding Up were approved by the shareholders at the Special Meeting. Legacy is a wholly owned subsidiary of NiMin and therefore, in order for the Company to complete the Winding Up, the appropriate corporate steps must also occur for the dissolution and liquidation of Legacy. Pursuant to the approval of the Sale of Assets, Legacy proceeded with the sale of the Wyoming oil and gas assets and the California oil and gas assets all as more particularly described below.

Upon completion of the ~~Sale of the Wyoming Assets and California Assets as described further below, the~~ disposition of all remaining assets of Legacy and the settlement of all liabilities of the Company and Legacy, the Company intends to distribute the net proceeds of the liquidation and dissolution of both Legacy and the Company to shareholders in ~~one~~multiple ~~or more~~ distribution installments. NiMin’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, dissolved in accordance with the laws of Delaware on September 17, 2012.

On June 28, 2012, the Company completed its previously announced sale of its assets in Wyoming’s Big Horn Basin (the “Wyoming Assets”) to BreitBurn Operating L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: BBEP), for total cash consideration of approximately US$93 million, being the original purchase price of approximately US$98 million less approximately US$5 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustments.

On June 29, 2012, the Company completed its previously announced sale of its assets in California’s San Joaquin Basin (the “California Assets”) to Southern San Joaquin Production, LLC for total cash consideration of approximately US$26 million, being the original purchase price of approximately US$27 million less approximately US$1 million adjusted to account for preliminary purchase price adjustments. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, US$3 million of the US$26 million purchase price paid on closing has been deposited with an escrow agent for a period of 6 months in connection with various indemnities contained therein.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented.

	Three monthended June 30,2012($)			Three monthended June 30,2011($)			Six monthended June 30,2012($)			Six monthended June 30,2011($)
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities		(1,086,183	)		2,476,631			(353,751	)		120,783
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities		115,987,775			(7,244,555	)		114,522,823			(11,277,339	)
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities		(36,029,108	)		130,245			(36,029,108	)		7,736,015
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		78,872,484			(4,637,679	)		78,139,964			(3,420,541	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		3,078,508			10,935,207			3,811,028			9,490,005
Foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents		—			(299	)		—			164,589
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year		81,950,992			6,297,229			81,950,992			6,234,053

As mentioned above, the Company’s board of directors declared an initial distribution to shareholders of $1.01 per Common Share in connection with the winding up of NiMin. The distribution will be made as a return of capital to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 9, 2012, and the stated capital of the Company will be reduced accordingly. The distribution will be payable on October 22, 2012. On September 28, 2012, the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) determined that its “Due Bill” trading procedures will apply to the initial distribution to shareholders. The estimated $1.13 net assets in liquidation per outstanding share has not been reduced for the initial distribution of $1.01 per Common Share declared by the board of directors on September 24, 2012, payable on October 22, 2012 to Shareholders of record on October 9, 2012.

The amount and timing of any subsequent distributions to shareholders will depend on a number of factors, several of which cannot be determined at this time, including the ultimate amount of our known, unknown, and contingent liabilities. As a result, the amount of cash remaining following completion of our liquidation and dissolution could vary from our current estimates.

Financial information presented as of and subsequent to June 30, 2012, includes a Consolidated Statement of Net Assets and a Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation, as required under the liquidation basis of accounting. Overall net assets in liquidation increased $829,034 from $77,914,535 at June 30, 2012 to $78,743,569 at September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily related to tax liability adjustments of $1,019,447. The remaining change in net assets related to investment income, adjustments to assets, costs incurred, and adjustments to liquidation accruals during the three month period.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented.


	Six months ended June 30, 2012 ($)			Three months ended September 30, 2011 ($)			Nine months ended September 30, 2011 ($)
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities		(353,751	)		(844,133	)		(723,350	)

Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities		114,522,823			(6,540,829	)		(17,818,168	)

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities		(36,029,108	)		4,055,652			11,791,667

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		78,139,964			(3,329,310	)		(6,749,851	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		3,811,028			9,490,005			9,490,005

Foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents		—			(276,892	)		(112,004	)

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period		81,950,992			5,883,804			2,628,150

In September 2011, we completed the Private Placement of 2,758,620 Units of the Company at a purchase price of CDN$1.45 per Unit for gross proceeds of CDN$3,999,999 or USD $4,010,545, net of CDN $267,224 or USD $267,928 of agents fees.

Effective December 1, 2011, we completed the divestiture of the Company’s non-operated and non-core interests in producing oil and gas properties located in the southern onshore region of Louisiana for a total of $1 million.

On June 28, 2012, and June 29, 2012, the Company completed its sale of its oil and gas properties in Wyoming and California for USD $93 million and USD $26 million, respectively. ~~Total cash considerations are subject to post close adjustments.~~

On June 30, 2010, the Company entered into a senior secured loan (the “Senior Loan”) in the amount of $36 million from a U.S. based institutional private lender (the “Lender”). The Company borrowed $36 million subject to an original issuer discount of 7.5%, a commitment fee of 1%, a placement fee of 1% and a transaction fee of 3%. Debt issuance costs of $4.9 million were incurred and were being amortized to net income under the effective interest method. The Senior Loan had a 12.5% fixed interest rate and a term of five years. Interest was paid quarterly beginning September 30, 2010.

Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

In December, 2010, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a patent to NiMin for its CMD process for enhanced oil recovery. Our patent covers the process of the injection of oxygen and water as foam to create carbon dioxide (“CO2”) and steam in the reservoir through wet combustion. Assets relating to the CMD technology were written down to the net realizable value of $0 within general and administrative expenses on June 30, 2012. The Company plans on transferring the patents to the Legacy Liquidating Trust as a part of the Winding Up.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off-balance sheet arrangements during the ~~three~~ six months ended June 30, 2012, and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, except for the office lease obligations ~~noted~~which ~~below~~were outstanding during those respective periods.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies, please refer to our Annual Report. The Company adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective June 30, 2012. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of a company is imminent and the net realizable values of assets are reasonably determinable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts. The Company will continue to incur operating costs and receive income on its cash investments from ~~June~~September 30, 2012, through the liquidation of the Company throughout the “Liquidation Period”. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a significant impact on our reported net assets in liquidation based on the most recent information available to us, and when necessary make changes accordingly. Actual costs and income may differ from our estimates, which might reduce net assets available in liquidation to be distributed to shareholders.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Commodity Price Risk

Our primary market risk is market changes in oil and natural gas prices. Commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas are impacted by world economic events that dictate the levels of supply and demand. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we entered into swap contracts to minimize the variability in cash flows due to price movements in crude oil (See Item 2 – “MD&A – Crude Oil and Derivative Contracts”). During the second quarter of 2012, the Company terminated and settled all derivative contracts as of May 17, 2012, and at September 30, 2012, carried no liability.

At26 ~~June 30, 2012, we recognized $0 as a derivative liability on crude oil derivative contracts as all contracts were fully settled.~~

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure control and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Based on the evaluation, management concluded that as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures continue to not be effective because of the material weaknesses as described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as amended from time to time, and filed with the SEC on March 14, 2012.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A 1.A. RISK FACTORS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None .

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

2628

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

EXHIBITS

10.1		First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 18, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 24, 2012).
10.2		Purchase and Sale Agreement among Legacy, Inc., NiMin Energy Corp. and Breitburn Operating L.P. dated April 24, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 30, 2012).
10.3		Purchase and Sale Agreement among Legacy, Inc., NiMin Energy Corp. and Southern San Joaquin Production, LLC. dated April 26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2012).
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

2731.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities ~~Exchange~~Axchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

NIMIN ENERGY CORP.

(Registrant)

Dated: August 9, 2012			By:	/s/ CLARENCE COTTMAN III
Dated: October 22, 2012	By:	/s/ Clarence Cottman III
	Clarence Cottman III			~~Clarence Cottman III~~
	Chief Executive Officer			~~Chief Executive Officer~~
	By:	/s/ Jonathan S. Wimbish	~~By:~~	~~/s/ JONATHAN S. WIMBISH~~
	Jonathan S. Wimbish			~~Jonathan S. Wimbish~~
	Chief Financial Officer			~~Chief Financial Officer~~

2830

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · NiMin Energy Corp.