UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-18431

Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		36-3544798
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

630-218-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No X

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Balance Sheets

June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

(unaudited)


Assets		2013			2012

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 1)	$		2,096,528			2,070,810
Other assets			1,118			2,442


Total current assets			2,097,646			2,073,252


Investment properties, at cost (including acquisition fees paid to affiliates of $216,239 and $216,239 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively) (Note 4):
Land and improvements			8,410,087			8,403,480


Total assets	$		10,507,733			10,476,732

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$		10,435			18,580
Accrued real estate taxes			8,577			7,283
Due to affiliates (Note 3)			16,924			17,079
Unearned income			73,312			0


Total current liabilities			109,248			42,942


Partners’ capital:
General Partner:
Capital contribution			500			500
Cumulative net income			5,351,319			5,351,661
Cumulative cash distributions			(5,335,451	)		(5,335,451)

			16,368			16,710

Limited Partners:
Units of $1,000. Authorized 30,001 Units, 29,593 Units outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (net of offering costs of $3,768,113, of which $1,069,764 was paid to affiliates)			25,873,403			25,873,403
Cumulative net income			27,988,937			28,022,788
Cumulative cash distributions			(43,480,223	)		(43,479,111)


			10,382,117			10,417,080


Total Partners’ capital			10,398,485			10,433,790


Total liabilities and Partners’ capital	$		10,507,733			10,476,732

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-2-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Statements of Operations

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

(unaudited)


		Three months ended June 30, 2013		Three months ended June 30, 2012		Six months ended June 30, 2013		Six months ended June 30, 2012

Revenues:
Rental income (Note 5)	$		36,633		49,898		72,867		100,297


Total revenues			36,633		49,898		72,867		100,297


Expenses:
Professional services to affiliates			11,288		14,062		25,634		24,639
Professional services to non-affiliates			12,328		7,751		49,659		40,065
General and administrative expenses to affiliates			4,197		2,013		8,463		4,912
General and administrative expenses to non-affiliates			3,557		6,816		20,911		23,725
Marketing expenses to affiliates			30		0		160		0
Land operating expenses to non-affiliates			4,336		6,121		7,219		10,698


Total expenses			35,736		36,763		112,046		104,039


Operating income (loss)			897		13,135		(39,179)		(3,742)

Interest income			1,250		3,236		2,486		5,678
Other income			1,000		2,000		2,500		4,850


Income (loss) from continuing operations			3,147		18,371		(34,193)		6,786

Discontinued operations (Note 2):
Income from discontinued operations			0		6,126		0		20,116
Gain on sale of investment properties			0		1,088,536		0		1,088,536

			0		1,094,662		0		1,108,652

Net income (loss)	$		3,147		1,113,033		(34,193)		1,115,438


Net income (loss) allocated to:
General Partner	$		31		390,245		(342)		390,269
Limited Partners			3,116		722,788		(33,851)		725,169


Net income (loss)	$		3,147		1,113,033		(34,193)		1,115,438


Net income (loss) allocated to the one General Partner Unit	$		31		390,245		(342)		390,269


Net income (loss) per Unit, allocated to Limited Partners per weighted average Limited Partnership Units (29,593 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012):
Continuing operations	$		.11		.62		(1.14)		.23
Discontinued operations			0		23.80		0		24.27


	$		.11		24.42		(1.14)		24.50

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-3-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Statements of Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

(unaudited)


		2013		2012

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$		(34,193)		1,115,438
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities (including discontinued operations):
Gain on discontinued operations			0		(1,088,536)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Other assets			1,324		0
Accounts payable			(8,145)		(5,491)
Accrued real estate taxes			1,294		(3,440)
Due to affiliates			(155)		5,931
Unearned income			73,312		100,218


Net cash provided by operating activities			33,437		124,120


Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to investment properties			(6,607)		(2,611)
Proceeds from disposition of investment property held for sale			0		2,212,584


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities			(6,607)		2,209,973


Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions			(1,112)		(2,194,618)


Net cash used in financing activities			(1,112)		(2,194,618)


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents			25,718		139,475
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			2,070,810		1,983,495


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$		2,096,528		2,122,970

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

-4-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013

(unaudited)

Readers of this quarterly report should refer to the Partnership’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 which are included in the Partnership’s 2012 annual report, as certain footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate those contained in such audited financial statements have been omitted from this report.

(1) Organization and Basis of Accounting

The Registrant, Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), was formed in October 1987, pursuant to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, to invest in undeveloped land on an all-cash basis and realize appreciation of such land upon resale. Between October 12, 1988 and October 6, 1989, the Partnership sold 30,000 Limited Partnership Units (“Units”) at $1,000 per Unit, which does not include the General Partner or the Initial Limited Partner, resulting in gross offering proceeds of $30,000,000. Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation is the General Partner. The Limited Partners of the Partnership share in their portion of benefits of ownership of the Partnership’s real property investments according to the number of Units held. Through June 30, 2013, the Partnership had repurchased a total of 407.75 Units for $359,484 from various Limited Partners through a unit repurchase program.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications, primarily as a result of discontinued operations, have been made to the 2012 financial statements to conform to the 2013 presentation. Unless otherwise noted, all disclosures in the financial statements relate to the continuing operations of the Partnership.

In the opinion of management, the financial statements contain all the adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented herein. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year.

The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents and are carried at cost, which approximates market value. The Partnership maintains its cash and cash equivalents at a financial institution. The account balances at the financial institution exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage of $250,000 and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Partnership believes that the risk is not significant, and the Partnership does not anticipate the financial institution’s non-performance.

The Partnership recognizes income from the sale of land parcels in accordance with the full accrual method of accounting.

The Partnership’s escrow agent holds earnest money deposits from a prospective purchaser when an agreement for sale is executed. Generally, these funds are not the Partnership’s until the closing has occurred or the buyer under the sale agreement has committed a default which would entitle the Partnership to the earnest money.

Except as described in footnote (b) to the Investment Properties table on page 15, the Partnership uses the area method of allocation, whereby a per acre price is used as the standard allocation method for land purchases and sales. The total cost of the parcel is divided by the total number of acres to arrive at a per acre price. Repairs and maintenance expenses are charged to operations as incurred.

-5-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013

(unaudited)

(2) Discontinued Operations and Investment Property Held for Sale

On May 4, 2012, the Partnership sold approximately 212 acres of Parcel 24 located in Kendall County, Illinois for approximately $2,220,000, which resulted in a gain on sale of $1,088,536. This property qualified for held for sale accounting treatment under GAAP during the first quarter of 2012. The gain on sale and operations for the sold parcel for the six months ended June 30, 2012 are included in discontinued operations on the accompanying statements of operations. There is no investment property classified as held for sale as of June 30, 2013.

(3) Transactions with Affiliates

The General Partner and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of employees of the General Partner and its affiliates relating to the administration of the Partnership. Such costs of $34,097 and $29,551 have been incurred and are included in professional services to affiliates and general and administrative expenses to affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which $16,924 and $17,079 was unpaid as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

An affiliate of the General Partner performed marketing and advertising services for the Partnership and was reimbursed (as set forth under terms of the Partnership Agreement) for direct costs. Such costs of $160 and $0 have been incurred and are included in marketing expenses to affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, all of which was paid as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

As of June 30, 2013, the Partnership held all cash and cash equivalents with Inland Bank and Trust, an affiliate of the General Partner.

(4) Investment Properties

As of June 30, 2013, the Partnership owned four parcels of land consisting of approximately 491 acres. There were no land sales during the six months ended June 30, 2013. During the second quarter of 2012, the Partnership sold the remaining balance of Parcel 24, consisting of approximately 212 acres, and during the third quarter of 2012, the Partnership sold Parcel 25, consisting of 225 acres, and Parcel 14, consisting of approximately 76 acres.

(a)	Reconciliation of investment properties owned:


		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012


Balance at January 1,	$		8,403,480		13,238,394
Additions during period			6,607		8,275
Sales during period			0		(4,843,189	)


Balance at end of period,	$		8,410,087		8,403,480

-6-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2013

(unaudited)

(b)

The Partnership has taken the steps necessary to reduce costs and maintain sufficient reserves of cash and cash equivalents to cover all our costs for an extended period of time. We have farm leases in place which generate sufficient income to cover the costs of insurance expense and real estate taxes. Our remaining land is not encumbered by debt and is located in areas that we believe are in the paths of future development. As such, the Partnership has the ability and management has the intent to hold the remaining parcels until such time as reasonable and acceptable offers are received. On a quarterly basis, the Partnership reviews impairment indicators and if necessary, conducts an impairment analysis to ensure that the carrying value of each investment property does not exceed its estimated fair value. If this were to occur, the Partnership would be required to record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value.

In determining the value of an investment property and whether the property is impaired, management considers several indicators which require difficult, complex and/or subjective judgments, such as projected sales prices, capital expenditures, assessment of current economic conditions and management’s intent to hold the remaining parcels until such time as reasonable and acceptable offers are received. These indicators are considered by management in determining the value of any particular property. The value of any particular property is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain indicators, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the actual results differ from management’s judgment, the valuation could be negatively or positively affected.

The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management’s continuous process of analyzing each property. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, there were no impairment provisions recorded by the Partnership.

(5) Rental Income

The Partnership has determined that all leases relating to the farm parcels are operating leases. Accordingly, rental income is reported when earned. Farm rent is fully collected during the first quarter. As such, a portion of the farm rent is classified as unearned income. As of June 30, 2013, unearned income was $73,312.

As of June 30, 2013, the Partnership had farm leases of generally one year in duration, for approximately 431 acres of the approximately 491 acres owned.

(6) Subsequent Events

The Partnership evaluates subsequent events occurring between the most recent balance sheet date and the date that the financial statements are available to be issued in order to determine whether the subsequent events are to be recorded in and/or disclosed in the Partnership’s financial statements and footnotes. The financial statements are considered to be available to be issued at the time that they are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There are no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

-7-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, adverse changes in real estate, financing and general economic or local conditions; the ability to obtain annexation and zoning approvals required to develop our properties; the approval of local governing bodies to develop our properties; successful lobbying of local “no growth” or limited development homeowner groups; eminent domain proceedings; changes in the environmental conditions or changes in the environmental positions of governmental bodies; and potential conflicts of interest between us and our affiliates, including our general partner.

We electronically file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (800)-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site at (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Critical Accounting Policies

The SEC previously issued Financial Reporting Release (FRR) or FRR No. 60 “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies.” A critical accounting policy is one that would materially affect our operations or financial condition, and requires management to make estimates or judgments in certain circumstances. We believe that our most critical accounting policies relate to how we value, classify, and allocate costs of investment properties and revenue recognition. These judgments often result from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The purpose of the FRR is to provide investors with an understanding of how management forms these policies. Critical accounting policies discussed in this section are not to be confused with accounting principles and methods disclosed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or GAAP. GAAP requires information in financial statements about accounting principles, methods used and disclosures pertaining to significant estimates. The following disclosure discusses judgments known to management pertaining to trends, events or uncertainties known which were taken into consideration upon the application of those policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported upon taking into consideration different conditions and assumptions.

Valuation of Investment Properties - On a quarterly basis, we review impairment indicators and if necessary, conduct an impairment analysis to ensure that the carrying value of each investment property does not exceed its estimated fair value. If an investment property is considered impaired, we would be required to record an impairment loss equal to the excess of carrying value over the estimated fair value.

In determining the value of an investment property and whether the property is impaired, management considers several indicators which require difficult, complex and/or subjective judgments, such as projected sales prices, capital expenditures, assessment of current economic conditions, and management’s intent to hold the remaining parcels until such time as reasonable and acceptable offers are received. These indicators are considered by management in determining the value of any particular property. The value of any particular property is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain indicators, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the actual results differ from management’s judgment, the valuation could be negatively or positively affected.

Cost Allocation – We use the area method of cost allocation, whereby a per acre price is used as the standard allocation method for land purchases and sales. The total cost of the parcel is divided by the total number of acres to arrive at a per acre price.

-8-

Revenue Recognition - We recognize income from the sale of land parcels in accordance with the full accrual method of accounting.

Assets Held for Sale - In determining whether to classify an asset as held for sale, we consider whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the asset; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (iii) we have initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) we believe that the sale of the asset is probable; (v) the due diligence period as defined in the sales agreement has expired and a closing date has been set; (vi) we are actively marketing the asset for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current value; and (vii) actions required for us to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made to the plan.

If all of the above criteria are met, we classify the asset as held for sale. The assets and liabilities associated with those assets that are held for sale are classified separately on the balance sheets for the most recent reporting period. Additionally, the operations for the periods presented are included in the statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of June 30, 2013, we have not classified any investment properties as investment property held for sale.

From time to time, we may determine that a “held for sale property” no longer meets the criteria to continue to be classified as held for sale. If this occurs, we record the property at the lower of the carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale or the fair value at the decision date not to sell.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Between October 12, 1988 and October 6, 1989, we sold 30,000 limited partnership units to the public at $1,000 per unit resulting in $30,000,000 in gross offering proceeds.

We used $25,187,069 of gross offering proceeds to purchase on an all-cash basis twenty-five parcels of undeveloped land and an option to purchase undeveloped land. These investments include the payment of the purchase price, acquisition fees and acquisition costs of such properties. Fourteen of the parcels were purchased during 1989 and eleven during 1990. Through June 30, 2013, we have had multiple sales transactions disposing of approximately 2,611 acres of the approximately 3,102 acres originally owned. As of June 30, 2013, cumulative distributions to the limited partners have totaled $43,480,223, which is equivalent to 145% of the original capital raised which was $30,000,000, and $5,335,451 to the general partner. Through June 30, 2013, we have used $20,317,283 of working capital for rezoning and other activities. Such amounts have been capitalized and are included in investment properties.

Our capital needs and resources will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the extent to which we conduct rezoning and other activities relating to utility access, the installation of roads, subdivision and/or annexation of land to a municipality, changes in real estate taxes affecting our land, and the amount of revenue received from leasing. As of June 30, 2013, we own, in whole or in part, four of our twenty-five original parcels, the majority of which are leased to local farmers and are generating sufficient cash flow from farm leases to cover real estate taxes and insurance expense.

At June 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,096,528 which is available to be used for our costs and liabilities, cash distributions to partners and other activities with respect to some or all of our land parcels.

There were no land sales for the six months ended June 30, 2013. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we received net sales proceeds of $2,212,584 from the sale of the remaining 212 acres of Parcel 24. We believe we have taken the steps necessary to reduce costs and maintain sufficient reserves of cash and cash equivalents to cover all our costs for an extended period of time. We have farm leases in place which generate sufficient income to cover the costs of insurance expense and real estate taxes. Our remaining land is not encumbered by debt and is located in areas that we believe are in the paths of future development. As land sales occur, net sales proceeds will be used to cover our current and future operations, including land improvements and land use activities. We will evaluate our cash needs throughout the year to determine future distributions.

We have been successful in pre-development activities such as rezoning, annexation and/or land planning of approximately 410 acres of Parcels 17/18/22 and 19 in McHenry, Illinois. Further pre-development activities are on hold pending significant improvements in the real estate market as well as demand for improved land zoned for residential and commercial use.

-9-

We continue to closely monitor the real estate market trends, especially within the areas where our remaining parcels are located. We have seen improvements in the residential real estate market, however, new home starts in these middle class communities remain weak. That, coupled with strict lender requirements, adversely impact sales activity, especially sales of residential lots and sales of vacant land for retail purposes. We are aware of farm parcel sales in surrounding communities from both speculators looking to hold land until the market rebounds, as well as farmers looking to increase their farming businesses. Inquiries on the Partnership’s land holdings have also increased.

Transactions with Related Parties

Our general partner and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement for salaries and expenses of their employees relating to our administration. Such costs of $34,097 and $29,551 have been incurred and are included in professional services to affiliates and general and administrative expenses to affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which $16,924 and $17,079 was unpaid as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

An affiliate of our general partner performed marketing and advertising services for us and was reimbursed for direct costs. Such costs of $160 and $0 have been incurred and are included in marketing expenses to affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, all of which was paid as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

As of June 30, 2013, the Partnership held all cash and cash equivalents with Inland Bank and Trust, an affiliate of the General Partner.

Results of Operations

As of June 30, 2013, we owned four parcels of land consisting of approximately 491 acres. Of the 491 acres owned, approximately 431 acres are leased to local farmers and generate sufficient cash flow to cover real estate taxes and insurance expense. Rental income was $72,867 and $100,297 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Rental income decreased due to fewer farm leases, as one farm was sold during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Farm rent payments are fully collected during the first quarter. A portion of the farm rent collected is classified as unearned income of $73,312 as of June 30, 2013.

We have been successful in pre-development activities such as rezoning, annexation and/or land planning of approximately 410 acres of Parcels 17/18/22 and 19 in McHenry, Illinois. A portion of Parcel 17/18/22 is within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Woodstock. A portion of Parcel 17/18/22 was forcibly annexed into the corporate limits of the Village of Bull Valley and subject to that village’s restrictions. For land planning purposes, it was our intent to have most of Parcel 17/18/22 annexed to the City of Woodstock. In a prior year, we entered into a Settlement and Annexation Agreement with the Village of Bull Valley which moved the boundary line favorably for us allowing us to proceed with the land planning for this collective parcel with the City of Woodstock. The settlement with Bull Valley provided the prospect of allowing us to develop the property with sewer and water facilities from the City of Woodstock and with a land use that could not have been developed in Bull Valley. In consideration for the release of land, we simultaneously conveyed approximately 51 acres to the Village of Bull Valley. Also as part of the settlement, we received favorable zoning for the remaining land that lies within the limits of the Village of Bull Valley. Due to the downturn in the real estate and financial markets the decision was made to discontinue the land planning process for this collective parcel until such time as the market rebounds and homebuilders and developers enter back into these markets.

Parcel 19 previously received approval required from certain Village of McHenry municipal departments for a preliminary plan approving a 41 unit well and septic residential subdivision to be called Hunters Woods. Following the downturn in the real estate market, we sought an extension in the time limit for recording the final plat for the Hunters Woods Subdivision. The extension expired on May 5, 2011. During the first quarter of 2011, we submitted a formal request for an additional extension as allowed by the Village of McHenry. We received a response which required addressing minor storm water comments raised by the McHenry County Department of Planning and Development. These matters have been addressed in a formal response. During May we received notice of a recent policy change by the Planning and Development Committee of the County Board regarding subdivisions extensions. The Committee will no longer grant extensions to subdivisions, as had become common practice over the last five years. Instead subdivision applicants that are currently in the final plat stage will now have the option of suspending the subdivision application for a

-10-

period of up to four years. We have accepted this option and as a result of this policy change we have until April 18, 2017 to reinitiate our request to proceed with the previously approved plan.

Professional services to affiliates and non-affiliates were $75,293 and $64,704 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Professional services primarily include accounting and legal fees. Professional services to affiliates and non-affiliates increased due to additional accounting fees for state tax filings, XBRL filing requirements, and audit fees.

General and administrative expenses to affiliates and non-affiliates were $29,374 and $28,637 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. General and administrative expenses primarily include data processing costs, postage, printing expenses and farm management fees. General and administrative expenses to affiliates and non-affiliates increased primarily due to an increase in printing and postage costs as a result of the mini-tender offer.

Marketing expenses to affiliates were $160 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Marketing expenses to affiliates were for signage costs.

Land operating expenses to non-affiliates were $7,219 and $10,698 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These costs primarily include real estate taxes and insurance. The decrease is due to a decrease in both real estate taxes and insurance since one parcel was sold during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Interest income was $2,486 and $5,678 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Interest income is primarily a result of the cash available to invest on a short term basis. The decrease in interest income is due to a decrease in interest rates.

Other income was $2,500 and $4,850 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Other income is due primarily to transfer fee income as a result of the number of completed unit transfers. The decrease is due to less transfer fee income as a result of a decrease in the number of completed unit transfers.

Income from discontinued operations was $0 and $1,108,652 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Included in income from discontinued operations are rental income, insurance and real estate taxes pertaining to the investment property held for sale as of June 30, 2012. There is no investment property held for sale as of June 30, 2013.

-11-

Investment Properties

We acquired fee ownership of the following real property investments. The table below summarizes the detail activity of all the land parcels owned by the Partnership from the purchase date through the quarter ending June 30, 2013.

Investment properties activity:


																		Total
		Gross												Costs				Remaining		Current Year
		Acres			Purchase/		Initial Costs							Capitalized		Costs of		Costs of		Gain(Loss)
Parcel	Illinois County	Purchased (Sold)			Sales Date			Original Costs		Acquisition Costs		Total Costs		Subsequent to Acquisition		Property Sold		Parcels at 6/30/13		on Sale Recognized
1	Kendall		84.7360			01/19/89	$		423,680		61,625		485,305		5,462,589		5,947,894		0		0
			(3.5200	)		12/24/96
			(.3520	)		11/25/97
			(80.8640	)		12/29/97

2	McHenry		223.4121			01/19/89			650,000		95,014		745,014		26,816		771,830		0		0
			(183.3759	)		12/27/90
			(40.0362	)		05/11/00

3	Kendall		20.0000			02/09/89			189,000		13,305		202,305		0		202,305		0		0
			(20.0000	)		05/08/90

4	Kendall		69.2760			04/18/89			508,196		38,126		546,322		1,223,376		1,769,698		0		0
			(.4860	)		02/28/91
			(27.5850	)		08/25/95
			(4.4017	)		Var 2001
			(2.1400	)		Var 2002
			(23.0933	)		Var 2003
			(6.7800	)		Var 2004
			(4.7900	)		Var 2005

5	Kendall (a)		372.2230			05/03/89			2,532,227		135,943		2,668,170		456,398		3,124,568		0		0
			(Option	)		04/06/90
			(372.2230	)		06/20/03

6	Kendall (b)		78.3900			06/21/89			416,783		31,691		448,474		1,461,256		1,909,730		0		0
			(3.9500	)		11/01/00
			(30.0000	)		07/12/05
			(33.4270	)		07/27/06
			(11.0130	)		08/22/07

7	Kendall (b)		77.0490			06/21/89			84,754		8,163		92,917		1,438,727		1,531,644		0		0
			(71.2070	)		08/22/07
			(5.8420	)		03/20/08

-12-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Investment properties activity (continued):


																		Total
		Gross												Costs				Remaining		Current Year
		Acres			Purchase/		Initial Costs							Capitalized		Costs of		Costs of		Gain(Loss)
Parcel	Illinois County	Purchased (Sold)			Sales Date			Original Costs		Acquisition Costs		Total Costs		Subsequent to Acquisition		Property Sold		Parcels at 6/30/13		on Sale Recognized
8	Kendall (b)		5.0000			06/21/89	$		60,000		5,113		65,113		0		65,113		0		0
			(5.0000	)		10/06/89

9	McHenry (b)		51.0300			08/07/89			586,845		22,482		609,327		94,659		0		703,986		0

10	McHenry (b)		123.9400			08/07/89			91,939		7,224		99,163		600		99,763		0		0
			(123.9400	)		12/06/89

11	McHenry (b)		30.5920			08/07/89			321,216		22,641		343,857		94,534		0		438,391		0

12	Kendall		90.2710			10/31/89			907,389		41,908		949,297		246,964		1,196,261		0		0
			(.7090	)		04/26/91
			(89.5620	)		03/10/04

13	McHenry		92.7800			11/07/89			251,306		19,188		270,494		18,745		289,239		0		0
			(2.0810	)		09/18/97
			(90.6990	)		02/15/01

14	McHenry		76.2020			11/07/89			419,111		23,402		442,513		206,810		649,323		0		0
			(76.2020	)		09/13/12

15	Lake		84.5564			01/03/90			1,056,955		85,283		1,142,238		1,661,344		2,803,582		0		0
			(10.5300	)		Var 1996
			(5.4680	)		Var 1997
			(68.5584	)		Var 1998

16	Kane/		72.4187			01/29/90			1,273,537		55,333		1,328,870		706,718		2,035,588		0		0
	Kendall		(30.9000	)		07/10/98
			(10.3910	)		12/15/99
			(3.1000	)		12/12/00
			(28.0277	)		05/19/03

17/18/22	McHenry		425.9360			Var 1990			3,844,632		223,856		4,068,488		2,348,907		332,070		6,085,325		0
			(1.0000	)		Var 1990
			(0.5200	)		03/11/93
			(27.5100	)		01/29/99
			(51.0000	)		10/02/08

-13-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

(a limited partnership)

Investment properties activity (continued):


																		Total
		Gross												Costs				Remaining		Current Year
		Acres			Purchase/		Initial Costs							Capitalized		Costs of		Costs of		Gain(Loss)
Parcel	Illinois County	Purchased (Sold)			Sales Date			Original Costs		Acquisition Costs		Total Costs		Subsequent to Acquisition		Property Sold		Parcels at 6/30/13		on Sale Recognized
19	McHenry		63.6915			02/23/90	$		490,158		29,158		519,316		663,069		0		1,182,385		0

20	Kane		224.1480			02/28/90			2,749,800		183,092		2,932,892		1,938,930		4,871,822		0		0
			(.2790	)		10/17/91
			(223.8690	)		02/20/04

21	Kendall		172.4950			03/08/90			1,327,459		75,822		1,403,281		954,415		2,357,696		0		0
			(172.4950	)		Var 1998

23	Kendall		140.0210			05/08/90			1,480,000		116,240		1,596,240		909,395		2,505,635		0		0
			(4.4100	)		Var 1993
			(35.8800	)		Var 1994
			(3.4400	)		Var 1995
			(96.2910	)		08/26/99

24	Kendall		298.4830			05/23/90			1,359,774		98,921		1,458,695		101,991		1,560,686		0		0
			(12.4570	)		05/25/90
			(4.6290	)		04/01/96
			(69.8200	)		11/26/02
			(211.577	)		05/04/12

25	Kane		225.0000			06/01/90			2,600,000		168,778		2,768,778		301,040		3,069,818		0		0
			(225.0000	)		09/07/12

	Totals						$		23,624,761		1,562,308		25,187,069		20,317,283		37,094,265		8,410,087		0

-14-

(a)

Included in the purchase agreement of Parcel 5 was a condition that required the Partnership to buy an option to purchase an additional 243 acres immediately to the west of this parcel. The 1990 sale transaction relates to the sale of this option.

(b)

The Partnership purchased from two third parties, two sets of three contiguous parcels of land (Parcels 6, 7 and 8; and Parcels 9, 10 and 11). The General Partner believes that the total value of this land will be maximized if it is treated and marketed to buyers as six separate parcels and closed the transactions as six separate purchases to facilitate this. Parcels 6, 7 and 8 were treated as one parcel and Parcels 9, 10 and 11 will continue to be treated as one parcel for purposes of computing Parcel Capital (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and distributions to the partners.

Subsequent Events

The Partnership evaluates subsequent events occurring between the most recent balance sheet date and the date that the financial statements are available to be issued in order to determine whether the subsequent events are to be recorded in and/or disclosed in the Partnership’s financial statements and footnotes. The financial statements are considered to be available to be issued at the time that they are filed with the SEC. There are no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

Other Items

In accordance with Article XVI Section 16.1 of the Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. Partnership Agreement and Treasury Regulation Section 1.7704-1(j), we have not yet reached the maximum threshold of limited partnership units that may be transferred/assigned directly between parties during 2013. Therefore, we may authorize additional sales of partnership units directly between parties during 2013. For the benefit of interested limited partners, we have a relationship with a “qualified matching service” as defined under Treasury Regulation Section 1.7704-1(g). In accordance with this Treasury Regulation and the IRS private letter ruling obtained by the “qualified matching service”, we understand that limited partnership units may be transferred/assigned up to a separate maximum threshold each taxable year (in addition to the maximum threshold that may be transferred/assigned directly between parties discussed above). However, there can be no assurance that the IRS private letter ruling will apply to transfers of our units, or that any particular transfer will not violate the transfer restrictions contained in our partnership agreement or the provisions of Treasury Regulation Section 1.7704-1(g). If you have any interest in participating in a transfer/assignment of partnership units through this “qualified matching service,” please contact American Partnership Board directly at 800-736-9797. You are strongly encouraged to consult your personal legal, financial and tax advisors in connection with any such transfer/assignment.

The Illinois Department of Revenue regulates Illinois income tax withholding requirements for nonresident partners. Payment of the required withholding amount of $1,106 was made to the Illinois Department of Revenue during March 2013 and was recorded as a distribution to the limited partners. We are also required to pay a withholding tax to the Internal Revenue Service with respect to a partner’s allocable share of our taxable net income, if the partner is a foreign person. We will first pay the withholding tax from the distributions to any nonresident and/or foreign partners, and to the extent that the tax exceeds the amount of distributions withheld, or if there have been no distributions to withhold, the excess will be accounted for as a distribution to such nonresident and/or foreign partners. During April 2013, we paid $6 to the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of foreign partners and recorded it as a distribution to the limited partners.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, Liabilities and Contracts and Commitments

None

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

-15-

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to us is made known to the members of senior management and the Audit Committee.

Based on management’s evaluation as of June 30, 2013, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2013. This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.

There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - Other Information

Items 1 through 5 are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits:


31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Principal Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Principal Financial Officer

32.1		Section 1350 Certification by Principal Executive Officer

32.2		Section 1350 Certification by Principal Financial Officer

101		The following financial information from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2013 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Balance Sheets, (ii) the Statements of Operations, (iii) the Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) related notes. This information is furnished but should not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

-16-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


				INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P.

		By:		Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation
		Its:		General Partner

		By:		/S/ BRENDA G. GUJRAL

		By:		Brenda G. Gujral
		Its:		Principal Executive Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.
		Date:		August 5, 2013

		By:		/S/ GUADALUPE GRIFFIN

		By:		Guadalupe Griffin
		Its:		Senior Vice President
		Date:		August 5, 2013

		By:		/S/ DONNA URBAIN

		By:		Donna Urbain
		Its:		Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.
		Date:		August 5, 2013

-17-

INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND LP 10-Q