Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 333-175188

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		20-2767829
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
501 Corporate Centre Drive, Suite 200 Franklin, Tennessee		37067
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

501 Corporate Centre Drive, Suite 200

Franklin, Tennessee

37067

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(615) 764-3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~August~~October 731, 2014, 100 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

CAPELLA HEALTHCARE, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
~~Item 1.~~	~~Financial~~Item ~~Statements~~1.	Financial Statements	3	3
~~Item 2.~~	~~Management’s~~Item ~~Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24	26
~~Item 3.~~	~~Quantitative~~Item ~~and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	38	43
~~Item 4.~~	~~Controls~~Item ~~and Procedures~~4.	Controls and Procedures	38	43
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
~~Item 1.~~	~~Legal~~Item ~~Proceedings~~1.	Legal Proceedings	39	43
~~Item 1A.~~	~~Risk~~Item ~~Factors~~1A.	Risk Factors	39	43
~~Item 6.~~	~~Exhibits~~Item 6.	Exhibits	40	44

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In millions, except share and per share data)

	December 31,2013 (a)			June 30,2014
	December 31,2013(a)			September 30,2014
				(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26.4		$	250.75
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $105.5 and $94.5 at December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, respectively		126.3			122.6
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $105.5 and $89.9 at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively		126.3			129.5
Inventories		24.3			24.89
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		11.6			1211.72
Deferred tax assets		2.5			0.52
Assets held for sale		13.1			—
Total current assets		204.2			~~186~~166.3
Property and equipment, net		456.1			~~444~~440.08
Goodwill		133.6			133.67
Intangible assets, net		13.2			12.16
Other assets, net		23.7			2324.94
Total assets	$	830.8		$	~~799~~777.98
Liabilities and stockholder’s deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	28.5		$	2832.26
Salaries and benefits payable		23.8			2325.75
Accrued interest		23.3			2311.37
Other accrued liabilities		32.7			2219.08
Current portion of long-term debt		49.6			44.1
Capital leases and long-term debt, current portion		49.6			3.6
Revolving line of credit		—			21.0
Liabilities held for sale		1.9			—
Total current liabilities		159.8			~~141~~114.32
Long-term debt		507.8			507.2
Capital leases and long-term debt, net of current portion		507.8			506.4
Deferred income taxes		17.3			17.04
Other liabilities		28.4			2930.08
Redeemable non-controlling interests		21.4			2019.89
Due to Parent		210.9			213.86
Stockholder’s deficit:
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, respectively		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively		—			—
Retained deficit		(114.8	)		(~~129~~124.25	)
Total stockholder’s deficit		(114.8	)		(~~129~~124.25	)
Total liabilities and stockholder’s deficit	$	830.8		$	~~799~~777.98

(a)	Derived from audited consolidated financial statements

See accompanying notes

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In millions)

	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Six Months EndedJune 30,
	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Revenues before provision for bad debts	$	~~204~~210.41		$	~~208~~216.37		$	~~408~~618.56		$	~~414~~630.18
Provision for bad debts		(2425.73	)		(1621.26	)		(4873.36	)		(3961.40	)
Revenues		~~179~~184.78			~~192~~195.1			~~360~~545.20			~~374~~569.78
Salaries and benefits		8384.57			9288.49			~~168~~252.29			~~180~~269.32
Supplies		2931.5			3133.64			5991.61			6295.04
Other operating expenses		4647.64			5048.04			91138.26			96145.60
Other income		(05.32	)		(35.06	)		(05.35	)		(49.39	)
Management fees		~~0.1~~—			~~0.1~~—			0.1			0.1
Interest, net		13.47			13.82			2741.30			2740.68
Depreciation and amortization		11.19			1110.37			2133.32			2233.52
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(4.2	)		(4.1	)		(7.2	)		(10.1	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		0.8			6.1			(6.4	)		(4.0	)
Income taxes		10.38			01.81			23.42			12.78
Loss from continuing operations		(5.5	)		(4.9	)		(9.6	)		(11.8	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		—			5.0			(9.6	)		(6.8	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(15.20	)		(0.34	)		(27.8	)		(23.71	)
Net loss		(6.7	)		(5.2	)		(12.4	)		(14.5	)
Net income (loss)		(5.0	)		4.6			(17.4	)		(9.9	)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests		(0.21	)		(0.21	)		(0.32	)		(0.12	)
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(6.5	)	$	(5.4	)	$	(12.1	)	$	(14.4	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(5.1	)	$	4.7		$	(17.2	)	$	(9.7	)

See accompanying notes

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Deficit

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014

(In millions, except share amounts)

								Total
					TotalRetainedDeficit			Stockholder’sDeficit
	Common Stock				~~Retained~~			~~Stockholder’s~~
	Shares		Amount		~~Deficit~~			~~Deficit~~
Balance at December 31, 2013(a)		100	$	—	$	(114.8	)	$	(114.8	)
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc. (unaudited)		—		—		(149.47	)		(149.47	)
Balance at June 30, 2014 (unaudited)		100	$	—	$	(129.2	)	$	(129.2	)
Balance at September 30, 2014 (unaudited)		100	$	—	$	(124.5	)	$	(124.5	)

(a)	Derived from audited consolidated financial statements

See accompanying notes

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In millions)

	SixMonths EndedJune 30,
	NineMonths EndedSeptember 30,
	2013			2014
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1217.4	)	$	(149.59	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Loss from discontinued operations		27.8			23.71
Depreciation and amortization		2133.32			2233.52
Amortization of loan costs and debt discount		23.0			2.09
Provision for bad debts		4873.36			3961.40
Deferred income taxes		12.64			12.64
Stock-based compensation		0.56			3.37
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of divestitures		(5593.3	)		(4579.47	)
Net cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations		89.89			1116.67
Net cash used in operating activities – discontinued operations		(2.89	)		(23.82	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		67.0			813.85
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment, net		(1521.45	)		(1017.26	)
Proceeds from disposition of healthcare business		—1.6			11.2
Other investing activities		—			(0.26	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(15.4	)		0.8
Net cash used in investing activities		(19.9	)		(7.0	)
Financing activities:
Payments on capital leases and other obligations		(26.52	)		(749.50	)
Payments of financing costs and fees		—			(2.0	)
Borrowings from revolving credit facility		—			35.0
Advances from (to) Parent		0.1			(0.4	)
Repayments of revolving credit facility		—			(14.0	)
Distributions to non-controlling interests		(0.7	)		(0.5	)
Payments of financing costs and fees		—			(2.1	)
Advances to Parent		—			(1.0	)
Distributions to non-controlling interests		(0.8	)		(1.4	)
Sale (repurchase) of non-controlling interests		(0.2	)		0.1
Net cash used in financing activities		(37.32	)		(1032.34	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1220.71	)		(025.79	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		33.3			26.4
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2013.62		$	250.75
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	2550.50		$	2549.54
Cash paid for taxes	$	1.35		$	0.79
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:
Capital lease obligations recorded	$	1214.25		$	—

See accompanying notes

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2014

~~Note~~ 1. ORGANIZATION ~~Organization~~AND ~~and~~BASIS ~~Basis~~OF ofPRESENTATION ~~Presentation~~

Organization

Capella Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is a wholly owned subsidiary of Capella Holdings, Inc. (the “Parent”). The Company operates general acute care hospitals and ancillary healthcare facilities in non-urban communities in the United States. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as part of continuing operations, the Company operated 11 general acute care hospitals ~~and related ancillary healthcare facilities~~, with a total of 1,496 licensed beds, and related ancillary healthcare facilities. Unless noted otherwise, discussions in these notes pertain to the Company’s continuing operations, which exclude the results of those facilities that have been previously disposed.

Recent Developments

During April 2014, the Parent completed an equity restructuring that included the conversion of $206.7 million preferred stock outstanding to a net 686.3 million shares of the Parent’s common stock and the forgiveness of $140.1 million of previously accrued dividends accreted as of March 31, 2014. See Note 11. Stock-Based Compensation, for additional information surrounding the issuance of stock-based awards by the Parent to the Company’s employees during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

In June 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries amended (the “ABL Amendment”) the terms of ~~the~~ the Company’s senior secured asset-based loan agreement, consisting of a $100 million revolving credit facility previously maturing in December 2014 (the “2010 Revolving Facility”). The ABL Amendment extended the maturity date of the ~~2010~~ 2010 Revolving Facility to the earlier of June 3, 2019 or April 1, 2017, if, as of such date, the Company’s 9 1⁄4% senior unsecured notes due ~~2017~~ 2017 (the “9 1⁄4% Notes”) have not been repaid or refinanced on terms satisfactory to Bank of America, N.A. ~~Management~~The ~~of the~~ Company believes that the ABL Amendment generally allows for greater operational flexibility on more favorable terms. See Note 9. Debt Obligations, 2010 Revolving Credit Facility and Amendment, for additional information.

During July 2014, the Company exercised a purchase option for approximately $39.4 million, excluding other costs and fees, to acquire certain tangible assets of Muskogee Community Hospital (“MCH”) that were subject to a capital lease. Additionally, in July 2014, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance for the promissory note previously issued in connection with the Company’s July 2012 acquisition of accounts receivable, supplies, inventory, goodwill and other intangible assets related to MCH. The Company used $5.3 million in available cash and cash equivalents and $35.0 million in availability from its 2010 Revolving Facility to fund the purchase and repayment. Since July 2014, the Company has repaid $14.0 million on the 2010 Revolving Facility to reduce the outstanding balance due under the 2010 Revolving Facility to $21.0 million at September 30, 2014.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, and disclosures considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries and entities controlled by the Company through the Company’s direct or indirect ownership of a majority interest and exclusive rights granted to the Company as the sole general partner or managing member of such entities. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2014

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement

Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-9

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-9, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-9”). ASU 2014-9 provides for a single comprehensive principles-based standard for the recognition of revenue across all industries through the application of the following five-step process:

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price.

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Among other provisions and in addition to expanded disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue, as well as certain ~~additional~~ additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures, ASU 2014-9 changes the healthcare industry specific presentation guidance under ASU 2011-7, “Presentation and Disclosure of Patient Service Revenue, Provision for Bad Debts, and the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for Certain Health Care Entities” (“ASU 2011-7”). The provisions of ASU 2014-9 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is not permitted.

7Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-8

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-8, “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment – Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-8”). Among other provisions and in addition to expanded disclosures, ASU 2014-8 changes the definition of what components of an entity qualify for discontinued operations treatment and reporting from a reportable segment, operating segment, reporting unit, subsidiary or asset group to only those components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Additionally, ASU 2014-8 requires disclosure about a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements, including the pretax profit or loss, attributable to the component of an entity for the period in which it is disposed of or is classified as held for sale. The disclosure of this information is required for all of the same periods that are presented in the entity’s results of operations for the period. The provisions of ASU 2014-8 are effective prospectively for all disposals or classifications as held for sale of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted.

The Company may, from time-to-time, identify one or more individual facilities that do not meet the Company’s on-going or future business strategy. In accordance with ASU 2014-8, in the event that an individually significant facility is identified for disposal but does not represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results, the results of the identified facility would continue to be reported as a component of the Company’s consolidated results. However, in this event and in accordance with ASU 2014-8, additional disclosures would be required.

2. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~guidance~~based ~~under~~compensation ~~ASU~~expense ~~2011-7,~~of ~~“Presentation~~$0.6 million and ~~Disclosure~~$3.7 ofmillion, ~~Patient~~respectively. ~~Service~~Business ~~Revenue,~~development ~~Provision~~and ~~for~~refinancing ~~Bad~~related ~~Debts~~costs, ~~and~~also ~~the~~included ~~Allowance~~within ~~for~~the ~~Doubtful~~aforementioned ~~Accounts~~general ~~for~~and ~~Certain~~administrative costs, ~~Health~~included ~~Care~~in ~~Entities” (“ASU~~other ~~2011-7”).~~operating ~~The~~expenses ~~provisions~~on ofthe ~~ASU~~condensed ~~2014-9~~consolidated ~~are~~statements ~~effective~~of ~~for~~operations, ~~annual~~were ~~periods~~$2.7 ~~beginning~~million ~~after~~and ~~December 15,~~$1.4 ~~2016,~~million ~~including~~for ~~interim~~the ~~periods~~nine ~~within~~months ~~those~~ended ~~years.~~September 30, ~~Early~~2013 ~~adoption~~and is2014, ~~not permitted~~respectively.

~~In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No~~3. ~~2014-8,~~ FAIR ~~“Presentation~~VALUE ofOF ~~Financial~~FINANCIAL ~~Statements~~INSTRUMENTS and Property, Plant, and Equipment—Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” Among other provisions and in addition to expanded disclosures, ASU 2014-8 changes the definition of what components of an entity qualify for discontinued operations treatment and reporting from a reportable segment, operating segment, reporting unit, subsidiary or asset group to only those components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Additionally, ASU 2014-8 requires disclosure about a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements, including the pretax profit or loss, attributable to the component of an entity for the period in which it is disposed of or is classified as held for sale. The disclosure of this information is required for all of the same periods that are presented in the entity’s results of operations for the period. The provisions of ASU 2014-8 are effective prospectively for all disposals or classifications as held for sale of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted.

Note 2. General and Administrative Costs

The majority of the Company’s expenses are “cost of revenue” items. Costs that could be classified as “general and administrative” by the Company would include its corporate overhead costs, which were $11.2 million and $16.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is included in salaries and benefits in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and within the aforementioned general and administrative costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, the Company incurred non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Business development and refinancing related costs, also included within the aforementioned general and administrative costs, included in other operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations, were $2.1 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Note 3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company applies the provisions of FASB authoritative guidance regarding fair value measurements, which provide a single definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures concerning fair value measurements. The Company applies these provisions to the valuation and disclosure of certain financial instruments. This authoritative guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: (i) Level 1, which is defined as quoted prices in active markets that can be accessed at the measurement date; (ii) Level 2, which is defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable, either directly or indirectly; and (iii) Level 3, which is defined as unobservable inputs resulting from the existence of little or no market data, therefore potentially requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s short-term financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at amounts that approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of the Company’s capital leases, the 2010 Revolving Facility and other long-term financing obligations also approximate carrying value as they bear interest at current market rates. The carrying amount of the 9 1⁄4% Notes was $500.0 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as disclosed in Note 9, Debt Obligations. The estimated fair value of the 9 1⁄4% Notes at ~~June~~ September 30, 2014 was approximately $~~525~~515.60 million, based onupon ~~the~~quoted average bid and ask ~~price~~prices asthat ~~quoted~~are ~~by the Company’s administrative agent under the indenture for the 9 1⁄4% Notes and is~~ categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

~~Note~~ 4. REVENUE ~~Revenue~~RECOGNITION ~~Recognition~~AND ~~and~~ACCOUNTS ~~Accounts~~RECEIVABLE ~~Receivable~~

The Company recognizes revenues before the provision for bad debts, including revenues from in-house patients and patients who have been discharged but not yet billed, in the period in which services are performed. Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from third-party payors and patients. The Company’s ability to collect outstanding receivables is critical to its results of operations and cash flows. The Company has entered into agreements with third-party payors, including government programs and managed care health plans, under which the Company is paid based upon established charges, the cost of providing services, predetermined rates per diagnosis, fixed per diem rates or discounts from established charges. Amounts the Company receives for treatment of patients covered by governmental programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and other third-party payors, such as health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations and other private insurers, are generally less than the Company’s established billing rates. Accordingly, the revenues and accounts receivable reported in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are recorded at the amount expected to be received.

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~amounts due from third-party payors and patients.~~ The ~~Company’s~~following ~~ability~~table tosets ~~collect~~forth outstanding receivables is critical to its results of operations and cash flows. The Company has entered into agreements with third-party payors, including government programs and managed care health plans, under which the ~~Company~~percentages ~~is paid based upon established charges, the cost~~ of ~~providing~~revenues ~~services,~~before ~~predetermined rates per diagnosis, fixed per diem rates or discounts from established charges. Amounts~~ the ~~Company~~provision ~~receives~~ for ~~treatment~~bad ~~of patients covered~~ debts by ~~governmental~~payor ~~programs,~~for ~~such~~the asthree ~~Medicare~~ and ~~Medicaid,~~nine ~~and~~months ~~other~~ended ~~third-party payors~~September 30, ~~such~~2013 ~~as health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations~~ and ~~other~~2014: private insurers, are generally less than the Company’s established billing rates. Accordingly, the revenues and accounts receivable reported in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are recorded at the amount expected to be received.

The following table sets forth the percentages of revenues before the provision for bad debts by payor for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Medicare(1)		38.0	%		37.4	%		38.5	%		39.6	%
Medicaid(1)		14.2			18.4			14.4			18.0
Managed Care and other(2)		35.7			33.2			35.7			33.5
Self-Pay		12.1			11.0			11.4			8.9

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Medicare(1)		37.9	%		40.5	%		38.7	%		40.8	%
Medicaid(1)		14.5			19.1			14.5			17.8
Managed Care and other(2)		35.9			33.2			35.7			33.6
Self-Pay		11.7			7.2			11.1			7.8
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

(1)	Includes revenues received under managed Medicare or managed Medicaid programs.

(2)	Includes the health insurance exchanges, beginning with the first quarter of 2014.

The Company derives a significant portion of its revenues before the provision for bad debts from Medicare, Medicaid and other payors that receive discounts from its standard charges. The Company must estimate the total amount of these discounts to prepare its consolidated financial statements. The Medicare and Medicaid regulations and various managed care contracts under which these discounts must be calculated are complex and are subject to interpretation and adjustment. The Company estimates the allowance for contractual discounts on a payor-specific basis given its interpretation of the applicable regulations or contract terms. These interpretations sometimes result in payments that differ from the Company’s estimates. Additionally, updated regulations and contract renegotiations occur frequently, necessitating regular review and assessment of the estimation process by management. Changes in estimates related to the allowance for contractual discounts affect revenues reported in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Settlements under reimbursement agreements with third-party payors are estimated and recorded in the period the related services are rendered and are adjusted in future periods as final settlements are determined. Final determination of amounts earned under the Medicare and Medicaid programs often occurs subsequent to the year in which services are rendered because of audits by the programs, rights of appeal and the application of numerous technical provisions. There is at least a reasonable possibility that such estimates will change by a material amount in the near term. The net estimated third-party payor settlements payable by the Company as of December 31, 2013 totaled $5.7 million compared to $20.25 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, and are ~~included~~ included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the net adjustments to estimated cost report settlements resulted in aan ~~decrease~~increase to revenues of $0.6 ~~million~~ ~~and $0.5~~ million~~, respectively~~. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30 , 2014, the net adjustments to estimated cost report settlements resulted in an increase to revenues of $10.38 million and $2.07 million, respectively. The Company’s ~~management~~ believes that adequate provisions have been made for adjustments that may result from final determination of amounts earned under these programs.

~~Provision~~Medicare Settlement ~~for~~of ~~Bad~~Pending ~~Debts~~Appeals ~~and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts~~

ToIn ~~provide~~August 2014, in response to concerns that the “two midnight rule” has caused a growth in claim appeals, the Centers for ~~accounts~~Medicare ~~receivable~~and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) announced that ~~could~~it ~~become~~is ~~uncollectible~~now offering to settle pending appeals in exchange for timely partial payment in an amount equal to 68% of the ~~future,~~net allowable amount of all eligible claims. CMS has encouraged hospitals with inpatient status claims currently in the ~~Company~~appeals ~~establishes~~process (or within the timeframe to request an ~~allowance~~appeal) ~~for~~to ~~doubtful~~make ~~accounts~~use of this administrative agreement mechanism to reduce the ~~carrying~~administrative ~~value~~burden of ~~such~~current appeals ~~receivables~~on both the hospital and Medicare systems. CMS has further advised that the agreement only applies to eligible claims from eligible providers, and specifies that “eligible claims” are those denied by a Medicare contractor on the basis that services may have been reasonable and necessary but treatment on an inpatient basis was not, that are either under appeal or within their ~~estimated~~administrative ~~net~~timeframe ~~realizable~~to ~~value~~request an appeal review, with dates of admissions prior to October 1, 2013, and where the claim was not paid under Medicare Part B. ~~The~~Hospitals ~~primary~~have ~~uncertainty~~until October 31, 2014 to participate in the settlement, but may request an extension, if needed. CMS has advised that it will pay hospitals within 60 days of ~~such~~validating ~~allowances~~the ~~lies~~eligible ~~with~~claims. ~~uninsured~~As ~~patient~~of ~~receivables~~September 30, 2014, the Company has elected to participate in the settlement and ~~deductibles,~~has ~~co-payments~~recognized or$1.2 ~~other~~million ~~amounts~~in ~~due~~revenues ~~from~~in ~~individual~~the ~~patients~~accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations related to the eligible claims. For more information about the “two midnight rule” and the settlement process described above, please see Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report on Form 10Q.

~~Additions~~10 to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made by means of the provision for bad debts. Accounts written off as uncollectible are deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts and subsequent recoveries are added. The amount of the provision for bad debts is based upon management’s assessment of historical and expected net collections, business and economic

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~conditions,~~Provision ~~trends in federal, state, and private employer healthcare coverage and other collection indicators. The provision~~ for ~~bad~~Bad ~~debts~~Debts and ~~the~~Allowance ~~allowance~~ for ~~doubtful~~Doubtful ~~accounts relate primarily to “uninsured” amounts (including copayment and deductible amounts from patients who have healthcare coverage) due directly from patients.~~ Accounts are written off when all reasonable internal and external collection efforts have been performed. The Company considers the return of an account from the primary external collection agency to be the culmination of its reasonable collection efforts and the timing basis for writing off the account balance. Accounts written off are based upon specific identification and the write-off process requires a write-off adjustment entry to the patient accounting system. Management relies on the results of detailed reviews of historical write-offs and recoveries (the hindsight analysis) as one source of information to utilize in estimating the collectability of the Company’s accounts receivable. The Company performs the hindsight analysis on a quarterly basis for all hospitals, generally utilizing rolling twelve-month accounts receivable collection, write-off, and recovery data. The Company supplements its hindsight analysis with other analytical tools, including, but not limited to, revenue days in accounts receivable, historical cash collections experience and revenue trends by payor classification. Adverse changes in general economic conditions, billing and collections operations, payor mix, or trends in federal or state governmental healthcare coverage could affect the Company’s collection of accounts receivable, cash flows and results of operations.

To provide for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. The primary uncertainty of such allowances lies with uninsured patient receivables and deductibles, co-payments or other amounts due from individual patients.

Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made by means of the provision for bad debts. Accounts written off as uncollectible are deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts and subsequent recoveries are added. The amount of the provision for bad debts is based upon management’s assessment of historical and expected net collections, business and economic conditions and other collection indicators. The provision for bad debts and the allowance for doubtful accounts relate primarily to “uninsured” amounts (including copayment and deductible amounts from patients who have healthcare coverage) due directly from patients. Accounts are written off when all reasonable internal and external collection efforts have been performed. The Company considers the return of an account from the primary external collection agency to be the culmination of its reasonable collection efforts and the timing basis for writing off the account balance. Accounts written off are based upon specific identification and the write-off process requires a write-off adjustment entry to the patient accounting system. Management relies on the results of detailed reviews of historical write-offs and recoveries (the hindsight analysis) as one source of information to utilize in estimating the collectability of the Company’s accounts receivable. The Company performs the hindsight analysis on a quarterly basis for all hospitals, generally utilizing rolling twelve-month accounts receivable collection, write-off, and recovery data. The Company supplements its hindsight analysis with other analytical tools, including, but not limited to, revenue days in accounts receivable, historical cash collections experience and revenue trends by payor classification. Adverse changes in general economic conditions, billing and collections operations, payor mix, or trends in federal or state governmental healthcare coverage could affect the Company’s collection of accounts receivable, cash flows and results of operations.

A summary of activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows (in millions):

	BeginningBalance atJanuary 1, 2014		AdditionsCharged toprovisionfor baddebts		AccountsWritten Off,Net ofRecoveries			Balance atEnd of Period
Six months ended June 30, 2014	$	105.5	$	39.4	$	(50.4	)	$	94.5
Nine months ended September 30, 2014	$	105.5	$	61.0	$	(76.6	)	$	89.9

The allowance for doubtful accounts was $105.5 million and $9489.59 million as of December 31, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively. These balances as a percentage of accounts receivable net of contractual adjustments were 45.5% and 4341.50% as of December 31, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively. The decrease in allowance for doubtful accounts is related to the decrease in uninsured patient ~~volumes~~revenues during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.

~~Note~~ 5. DISCONTINUED ~~Discontinued~~OPERATIONS ~~Operations~~

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company completed the sale of Grandview Medical Center (“Grandview”). The Company has presented Grandview’s operating results and cash flows as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Revenues~~11 before the provision for bad debts and the loss reported in discontinued operations for the Company’s discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, are as follows (in millions):

	Three months endedJune 30,						Six months endedJune 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Revenues before the provision for bad debts from discontinued operations	$	7.8		$	0.1		$	16.1		$	4.6
Loss from discontinued operations
Net loss from sale of healthcare business		—			—			—			(1.6	)
Loss from operations		(1.2	)		(0.3	)		(2.8	)		(1.1	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(1.2	)	$	(0.3	)	$	(2.8	)	$	(2.7	)

The Company had previously recognized a $1.8 million loss on impairment for Grandview’s goodwill during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Note 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~circumstances~~Revenues ~~indicate~~before athe ~~possible~~provision ~~impairment~~for ~~may~~bad ~~exist.~~debts ~~The Company performed its most recent goodwill impairment testing as of October 1, 2013~~ and ~~did~~the ~~not~~loss ~~incur~~reported anin ~~impairment~~discontinued ~~charge. The~~operations for the Company’s ~~goodwill~~discontinued ~~balance~~operations ~~was~~for ~~$133.6~~the ~~million~~three atand ~~December~~nine months ended September 3130, 2013 and ~~June 30~~2014, ~~2014.~~are as follows (in millions):


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Revenues before the provision for bad debts from discontinued operations	$	8.1		$	—		$	24.2		$	4.6

Loss from discontinued operations
Net loss from sale of healthcare business		(2.3	)		—			(2.3	)		(1.6	)
Estimated loss from impairment of goodwill related to healthcare businesses		(1.8	)		—			(1.8	)		—
Loss from operations		(0.9	)		(0.4	)		(3.7	)		(1.5	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(5.0	)	$	(0.4	)	$	(7.8	)	$	(3.1	)

The Company had previously recognized a $1.8 million loss on impairment for Grandview’s goodwill during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The Company’s business comprises a single reporting unit for impairment test purposes. For the purposes of these analyses, the Company’s estimates of fair value are based on the income approach, which estimates the fair value of the Company based on its future discounted cash flows. In addition to the annual impairment reviews, impairment reviews are performed whenever there are indications that a possible impairment may exist. The Company performed its most recent goodwill impairment testing as of October 1, 2013 and did not incur an impairment charge. The Company’s goodwill balance was $133.6 million and $133.7 million at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively.

Deferred Loan Costs

The Company records deferred loan costs for expenditures related to acquiring or issuing new debt instruments. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, the Company recorded additional deferred loan costs of $1.24 million related to the ABL Amendment. See Note 9. Debt Obligations, 2010 Revolving Credit Facility and Amendment, for additional information. Net deferred loan costs of $0.1 million were written off to interest expense as part of the transaction costs associated with the ABL Amendment. These expenditures include bank fees and premiums, as well as attorneys’ and filing fees, and were evaluated in accordance with accounting guidance related to modifications or exchanges of revolving debt arrangements. Net deferred loan costs are $8.3 million and $7.83 million, net of accumulated amortization of $13.3 million and $1011.85 million at December 31, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and are included in other assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company amortizes the deferred loan costs to interest expense over the life of the respective debt instrument.

Contract-Based Physician Minimum Revenue Guarantees

The Company committed to provide certain financial assistance pursuant to recruiting agreements, or “physician minimum revenue guarantees,” with various physicians practicing in the communities it services. In consideration for a physician relocating to one of its communities and agreeing to engage in private practice for the benefit of the respective community, the Company may advance certain amounts of money to a physician to assist in establishing his or her practice.

The Company records a contract-based intangible asset and related guarantee liability for new physician minimum revenue guarantees. The contract-based intangible asset is amortized to other operating expenses over the period of the ~~physician contract, which is typically~~ four years. The Company’s physician income guarantee intangible assets were $13.8 million ($8.5 million, net) and $13.1 million ($7.6 million, net) at December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The Company committed to advance a maximum amount of approximately $4.5 million at June 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, the Company’s liability balance for contract-based physician minimum revenue guarantees was approximately $2.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, which is included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

~~Note~~12 ~~7. Income Taxes~~

The Company’s income tax expense was $1.7 million on losses from continuing operations of $10.1 million, for an effective income tax rate of 16.8% during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company’s income tax expense was $2.4 million on losses from continuing operations of $7.2 million, for an effective income tax rate of 33.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Due to the Company’s valuation allowance, the effective tax rate bears no relationship to pre-tax income.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is, from time to time, subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims for damages for personal injuries, medical malpractice, breach of management contracts, wrongful restriction of or interference with physicians’ staff privileges and employment related claims. In certain of these actions, plaintiffs request punitive or other damages against the Company which may not be covered by insurance. The Company is currently not a party to any proceeding which, in management’s opinion, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~Note~~ physician 9contract, which is typically four years. ~~Debt~~The ~~Obligations~~Company’s physician income guarantee intangible assets were $13.8 million ($8.5 million, net) and $13.7 million ($8.3 million, net) at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively. The Company committed to advance a maximum amount of approximately $4.5 million at September 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, the Company’s liability balance for contract-based physician minimum revenue guarantees was approximately $2.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which is included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

~~The~~7. INCOME ~~following~~TAXES ~~table presents a summary of the Company’s debt obligations at December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 (in millions):~~

	December 31,2013			June 30,2014
9 1⁄4% Notes	$	500.0		$	500.0
Unamortized discount on 9 1⁄4% Notes		(3.2	)		(2.7	)
Total 9 1⁄4% Notes		496.8			497.3
Capital lease obligations		55.5			52.3
Other		5.1			1.7
Total debt obligations		557.4			551.3
Less current maturities		49.6			44.1
Total	$	507.8		$	507.2

The Company’s income tax expense was $2.8 million on losses from continuing operations of $4.0 million, for an effective income tax rate of 70.0% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company’s income tax expense was $3.2 million on losses from continuing operations of $6.4 million, for an effective income tax rate of 50.0% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Due to the Company’s valuation allowance, the effective tax rate bears no relationship to pre-tax income.

~~9 1⁄4%~~8. COMMITMENTS ~~Senior~~AND ~~Unsecured~~CONTINGENCIES ~~Notes~~

9. DEBT OBLIGATIONS

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s debt obligations at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (in millions):


	December 31, 2013			September 30, 2014
9¹⁄₄% Notes	$	500.0		$	500.0
Unamortized discount on 9¹⁄₄% Notes		(3.2	)		(2.5	)

Total 9¹⁄₄% Notes		496.8			497.5
2010 Revolving Facility		—			21.0
Capital lease obligations		55.5			12.5
Other		5.1			—

Total debt obligations		557.4			531.0
Less current maturities		49.6			24.6

Capital leases and long-term debt, net of current portion	$	507.8		$	506.4

9¹/₄% Senior Unsecured Notes

The 9¹⁄₄% Notes are unsecured general obligations of the Company and rank equal in right of payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the Company. The 9¹⁄₄% Notes mature July 1, 2017. Interest on the 9¹⁄₄% Notes is payable semi-annually in July and January of each year. All payments on the 9¹⁄₄% Notes are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior unsecured basis by the Parent and substantially all of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2014

The Company may redeem all or a part of the 9¹⁄₄% Notes at any time on or after July 1, 2013, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption plus a redemption price equal to a percentage of the principal amount of the 9¹⁄₄% Notes redeemed based on the following redemption schedule:


July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015	104.625	%
July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016	102.313	%
July 1, 2016 and thereafter	100.000	%

If the Company experiences a change of control under certain circumstances, the Company must offer to repurchase all of the 9¹⁄₄% Notes at a price equal to 101.000% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date.

2010 Revolving Credit Facility and Amendment

In June 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries amended certain terms of the Company’s senior secured asset-based loan agreement. The ABL Amendment extended the maturity date of the 2010 Revolving Facility to the earlier of June 3, 2019 or April 1, 2017, if, as of such date, the 9¹⁄₄% Notes have not been repaid or refinanced on terms satisfactory to Bank of America, N.A.

Subsequent to the ABL Amendment, the applicable margin in effect for borrowings under the 2010 Revolving Facility ~~were~~was reduced from 2.00% to 0.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and from 3.00% to 1.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings, or reduced from a maximum of 2.50% to 1.00% with respect to base rate borrowings and reduced from a maximum of 3.50% to 2.00% for LIBOR borrowings, subject to the ~~company~~Company’s fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the 2010 Revolving Facility in respect of the unutilized commitments thereunder. Subsequent to the ABL Amendment, based on the average facility usage for the most recently ended calendar month, the commitment fee was reduced from a range of 0.50% to 0.75% to a range of 0.25% to 0.375% per annum. See Note 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Deferred Loan Costs, for additional disclosures about the expenditures incurred related to the ABL Amendment.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company had noa $21.0 million outstanding ~~loans~~balance due under the 2010 Revolving Facility. At ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, the Company had availability under the 2010 Revolving Facility of $6551.65 million, net of ~~outstanding~~a ~~letters~~$21.0 ofmillion ~~credit~~outstanding ofbalance due and $5.7 million, outstanding letters of credit. The outstanding letters of credit are primarily used as ~~the~~ collateral under the Company’s workers’ compensation programs.

12MCH Capital Lease and Promissory Note

During July 2014, the Company exercised a purchase option for approximately $39.4 million, excluding other costs and fees, to acquire certain tangible assets of MCH that were subject to a capital lease. Additionally, in July 2014, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance for the promissory note previously issued in connection with the Company’s July 2012 acquisition of accounts receivable, supplies, inventory, goodwill and other intangible assets related to MCH. The Company used $5.3 million in available cash and cash equivalents and $35.0 million in availability from its 2010 Revolving Facility to fund the purchase and repayment. Since July 2014, the Company has repaid $14.0 million on the 2010 Revolving Facility to reduce the outstanding balance due under the 2010 Revolving Facility to $21.0 million at September 30, 2014.

Debt Covenants

Both the indenture governing the 9¹⁄₄% Notes and the 2010 Revolving Facility contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the Company’s ability and the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries, to sell assets, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock, create liens on assets, make investments, engage in mergers or consolidations, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~Debt~~At ~~Covenants~~September 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with the debt covenants for both the 9 1⁄4% Notes and the 2010 Revolving Facility that were subject to testing at that date.

~~Both~~10. GUARANTOR ~~the~~AND ~~indenture~~NON-GUARANTOR ~~governing~~SUPPLEMENTARY ~~the~~INFORMATION 9 1⁄4% Notes and the 2010 Revolving Facility contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the Company’s ability and the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries, to sell assets, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock, create liens on assets, make investments, engage in mergers or consolidations, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

At June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with the debt covenants for both the 9 1⁄4% Notes and the 2010 Revolving Facility that were subject to testing at that date.

Subsequent Event

In July 2014, the Company exercised a purchase option to acquire assets previously subject to a capital lease and a note payable. To fund the purchase, the Company utilized credit available under the 2010 Revolving Facility. See Note 12. Subsequent Event, for additional information.

Note 10. Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Supplementary Information

The 9¹⁄₄% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by substantially all of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. The subsidiary guarantee release provisions under the indentures governing these notes are considered customary and include the sale, merger or transfer of the subsidiary’s assets under a qualifying transaction as set forth in the indentures; the full release or discharge of the indebtedness including a legal defeasance or a qualifying covenant defeasance; and the designation of the subsidiary as an unrestricted subsidiary as set forth in the indentures.

The following presents the condensed consolidating financial information for the Company (as parent issuer), guarantor subsidiaries, non-guarantor subsidiaries, certain eliminations and the Company as of December 31, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and for the three and ~~six months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2014:

1315

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

December 31, 2013

(In Millions)


	Parent Issuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31.9		$	(3.6	)	$	(1.9	)	$	—	$	26.4
Accounts receivable, net		—			74.9			51.4			—		126.3
Inventories		—			14.1			10.2			—		24.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4.6			4.7			2.3			—		11.6
Deferred tax assets		2.5			—			—			—		2.5
Assets held for sale		—			13.1			—			—		13.1

Total current assets		39.0			103.2			62.0			—		204.2
Property and equipment, net		1.7			298.3			156.1			—		456.1
Goodwill		133.6			—			—			—		133.6
Intangible assets, net		—			10.0			3.2			—		13.2
Investments in subsidiaries		(6.1	)		—			—			6.1		—
Other assets, net		22.8			0.9			—			—		23.7

	$	191.0		$	412.4		$	221.3		$	6.1	$	830.8

Liabilities and stockholder’s deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	0.8		$	15.0		$	12.7		$	—	$	28.5
Salaries and benefits payable		2.9			11.4			9.5			—		23.8
Accrued interest		23.3			—			—			—		23.3
Other accrued liabilities		8.2			14.0			10.5			—		32.7
Current portion of long-term debt		—			48.2			1.4			—		49.6
Liabilities held for sale		—			1.9			—			—		1.9

Total current liabilities		35.2			90.5			34.1			—		159.8
Long-term debt		—			366.0			141.8			—		507.8
Deferred income taxes		17.3			—			—			—		17.3
Other liabilities		27.6			0.5			0.3			—		28.4
Redeemable non-controlling interests		—			—			21.4			—		21.4
Due to Parent		225.7			5.1			(19.9	)		—		210.9
Total stockholder’s deficit		(114.8	)		(49.7	)		43.6			6.1		(114.8	)

	$	191.0		$	412.4		$	221.3		$	6.1	$	830.8

1416

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

~~June~~September 30, 2014

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~29.3~~—		$	(20.14	)	$	(10.51	)	$	—	$	250.75
Accounts receivable, net		—			7579.46			4749.29			—		~~122~~129.65
Inventories		—			14.68			10.21			—		24.89
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		42.40			56.50			23.82			—		1211.72
Deferred tax assets		0.52			—			—			—		0.52
Total current assets		342.2			93100.48			5863.73			—		~~186~~166.3
Property and equipment, net		1.6			~~291~~290.24			~~151~~148.28			—		~~444~~440.08
Goodwill		133.67			—			—			—		133.67
Intangible assets, net		—			8.75			3.4.1			—		12.16
Investments in subsidiaries		(80.47	)		—			—			80.47		—
Other assets, net		23.15			0.78			0.1			—		2324.94
	$	~~184~~160.13		$	~~394~~400.05		$	~~213~~216.43		$	80.47	$	~~799~~777.98
Liabilities and stockholder’s deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	20.93		$	1419.19		$	1112.24		$	—	$	2832.26
Salaries and benefits payable		3.12			1213.17			8.56			—		2325.75
Accrued interest		2311.37			—			—			—		2311.37
Other accrued liabilities		79.50			64.72			76.86			—		2219.08
Current portion of long-term debt		—			422.83			1.3			—		443.16
Total current liabilities		36.8			75.7			28.8			—		141.3
Line of credit payable		21.0			—			—			—		21.0
Long-term debt		—			365.8			141.4			—		507.2
Total current liabilities		45.2			40.1			28.9			—		114.2
Deferred income taxes		17.0			—			—			—		17.0
Long-term debt		—			365.2			141.2			—		506.4
Other liabilities		29.6			0.4			(1.0	)		—		29.0
Deferred income taxes		17.4			—			—			—		17.4
Redeemable non-controlling interests		—			—			20.8			—		20.8
Other liabilities		31.1			0.4			(0.7	)		—		30.8
Due to parent		229.9			6.8			(22.9	)		—		213.8
Redeemable non-controlling interests		—			—			19.9			—		19.9
Total stockholder’s deficit		(129.2	)		(54.7	)		46.3			8.4		(129.2	)
Due to parent		191.1			44.1			(21.6	)		—		213.6
	$	184.1		$	394.0		$	213.4		$	8.4	$	799.9
Total stockholder’s deficit		(124.5	)		(49.3	)		48.6			0.7		(124.5	)
	$	160.3		$	400.5		$	216.3		$	0.7	$	777.8

1517

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues before provision for bad debts	$	—		$	~~120~~122.16		$	8487.35		$	—		$	~~204~~210.41
Provision for bad debts		—			(1314.34	)		(1110.49	)		—			(2425.73	)
Revenues		—			~~106~~108.82			7276.96			—			~~179~~184.78
Salaries and benefits		3.42			4850.50			31.65			—			8384.57
Supplies		—			1516.75			1315.80			—			2931.5
Other operating expenses		31.03			2527.67			18.04			—			4647.64
Other Income		—			(04.35	)		—(0.7	)		—			(05.32	)
Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates		1.79			—			—			(1.79	)		—
Management fees		(5.23	)		3.4			1.9			—			~~0.1~~—
Interest, net		1.34			8.9.0			3.23			—			13.47
Depreciation and amortization		12.50			6.14			3.5			—			11.19
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(5.7	)		(1.1	)		0.9			1.7			(4.2	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(4.5	)		(0.3	)		3.7			1.9			0.8
Income taxes		0.86			(0.21	)		0.71			—			10.38
Loss from continuing operations		(6.5.1	)		(0.94	)		03.26			1.79			~~(5.5~~—	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(15.47	)		0.27			—			(15.20	)
Net loss		(6.5.1	)		(26.31	)		0.4.3			1.79			(65.70	)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			(0.2	)		—			(0.2	)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			0.1			—			0.1
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(6.5.1	)	$	(26.31	)	$	04.62		$	1.79		$	(6.5.1	)

1618

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues before provision for bad debts	$	—		$	~~124~~132.90		$	8384.47		$	—		$	~~208~~216.37
Provision for bad debts		—			(912.14	)		(79.12	)		—			(1621.26	)
Revenues		—			~~115~~119.86			7675.35			—			~~192~~195.1
Salaries and benefits		93.08			52.04			3132.47			—			9288.49
Supplies		—			1718.14			1415.50			—			3133.64
Other operating expenses		1.83			28.16			2018.15			—			5048.04
Other income		—			(03.24	)		(2.82	)		—			(35.06	)
Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates		(3.8.7	)		—			—			3.8.7			—
Management fees		(4.45	)		2.98			1.67			—			~~0.1~~—
Interest, net		21.07			8.73			3.12			—			13.82
Depreciation and amortization		0.18			76.32			3.97			—			1110.37
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(4.7	)		(0.1	)		4.5			(3.8	)		(4.1	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		5.6			6.3			2.9			(8.7	)		6.1
Income taxes		0.79			0.1			—0.1			—			01.81
Loss from continuing operations		(5.4	)		(0.2	)		4.5			(3.8	)		(4.9	)
Income from continuing operations		4.7			6.2			2.8			(8.7	)		5.0
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(0.34	)		—			—			(0.34	)
Net loss		(5.4	)		(0.5	)		4.5			(3.8	)		(5.2	)
Net income		4.7			5.8			2.8			(8.7	)		4.6
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			(0.21	)		—			(0.21	)
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(5.4	)	$	(0.5	)	$	4.3		$	(3.8	)	$	(5.4	)
Net income attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	4.7		$	5.8		$	2.9		$	(8.7	)	$	4.7

1719

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues before provision for bad debts	$	—		$	~~240~~363.48		$	~~168~~254.18		$	—		$	~~408~~618.56
Provision for bad debts		—			(2539.37	)		(2333.09	)		—			(4873.36	)
Revenues		—			~~215~~324.1			~~145~~220.19			—			~~360~~545.20
Salaries and benefits		69.68			97148.84			6394.87			—			~~168~~252.29
Supplies		—			3147.49			2843.2			—			5991.61
Other operating expenses		45.69			5179.65			3553.02			—			91138.26
Other income		—			(04.39	)		—(0.6	)		—			(05.35	)
Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates		57.54			—			—			(57.54	)		—
Management fees		(1015.47	)		610.82			35.76			—			0.1
Interest, net		23.48			1827.32			610.60			—			2741.30
Depreciation and amortization		24.0			1218.48			610.94			—			2133.32
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(1015.72	)		(23.90	)		04.94			57.54			(76.24	)
Income taxes		12.40			0.34			0.78			—			23.42
Loss from continuing operations		(1217.12	)		(3.24	)		03.26			57.54			(9.6	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(28.76	)		(0.18	)		—			(27.8	)
Net loss		(1217.12	)		(512.90	)		04.14			57.54			(1217.4	)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			(0.32	)		—			(0.32	)
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(1217.12	)	$	(512.90	)	$	0.4.6		$	57.54		$	(1217.12	)

1820

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations

For ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues before provision for bad debts	$	—		$	~~249~~381.2		$	~~164~~249.96		$	—		$	~~414~~630.18
Provision for bad debts		—			(2134.93	)		(1726.57	)		—			(3961.40	)
Revenues		—			~~227~~346.39			~~147~~222.49			—			~~374~~569.78
Salaries and benefits		1216.75			~~104~~156.15			6396.52			—			~~180~~269.32
Supplies		—			3351.59			2843.5			—			6295.04
Other operating expenses		3.4.7			5584.51			3756.72			—			96145.60
Other income		—			(1.4.8	)		(25.91	)		—			(49.39	)
Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates		2(6.34	)		—			—			(26.34	)		—
Management fees		(913.05	)		5.8.6			35.30			—			0.1
Interest, net		35.63			1725.69			69.46			—			2740.68
Depreciation and amortization		0.19			1420.57			711.96			—			2233.52
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(137.15	)		(24.30	)		35.09			2(6.34	)		(104.10	)
Income taxes		12.32			0.12			0.34			—			12.78
Loss from continuing operations		(149.47	)		(23.48	)		25.75			2(6.34	)		(116.8	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(23.60	)		(0.1	)		—			(23.71	)
Net loss		(149.47	)		~~(5.~~0.8	)		25.64			2(6.34	)		(149.59	)
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			(0.12	)		—			(0.12	)
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(149.47	)	$	~~(5.~~0.8	)	$	25.76		$	2(6.34	)	$	(149.47	)

1921

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For The ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1217.12	)	$	(512.90	)	$	04.14		$	57.54		$	(1217.4	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in earnings of affiliates		57.54			—			—			(57.54	)		—
Loss from discontinued operations		—			28.76			(0.18	)		—			27.8
Depreciation and amortization		24.0			1218.48			610.94			—			2133.32
Amortization of loan costs and debt discount		12.63			0.35			0.12			—			23.0
Provision for bad debts		—			2539.37			2333.09			—			4873.36
Deferred income taxes		12.64			—			—			—			12.64
Stock-based compensation		0.56			—			—			—			0.56
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of divestitures		(012.83	)		(2839.19	)		(2641.41	)		—			(5593.3	)
Net cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations		(112.78	)		615.7			37.80			—			89.89
Net cash used in operating activities – discontinued operations		—			(23.87	)		—0.8			—			(2.89	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		(112.78	)		312.90			37.8			—			67.0
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment, net		(64.62	)		(37.97	)		(4.9.6	)		—			(1521.45	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(6.6	)		(3.9	)		(4.9	)		—			(15.4	)
Proceeds from disposition of healthcare businesses		—			1.6									1.6
Net cash used in investing activities		(4.2	)		(6.1	)		(9.6	)		—			(19.9	)
Financing activities:
Payments on capital leases and other obligations		—			(25.19	)		(0.43	)		—			(26.52	)
Advances from Parent		(32.45	)		21.94			01.61			—			~~0.1~~—
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—			—			(0.78	)		—			(0.78	)
Repurchases of non-controlling interests		—			—			(0.2	)		—			(0.2	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(32.45	)		0(4.85	)		(0.72	)		—			(37.32	)
Change in cash and cash equivalents		(1119.75	)		01.84			(12.80	)		—			(1220.71	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		39.5			(4.4	)		(1.8	)		—			33.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2720.80		$	(3.60	)	$	(3.68	)	$	—		$	2013.62

2022

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For The ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014

(In Millions)

	ParentIssuer			Guarantors			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(149.47	)	$	~~(5.~~0.8	)	$	25.64		$	2(6.34	)	$	(149.59	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in earnings of affiliates		2(6.34	)		—			—			(26.34	)		—
Loss from discontinued operations		—			23.60			0.1			—			23.71
Depreciation and amortization		0.19			1420.57			711.96			—			2233.52
Amortization of loan costs and debt discount		12.62			0.25			0.2			—			2.09
Provision for bad debts		—			2134.93			1726.57			—			3961.40
Deferred income taxes		12.74			~~(0.1~~—	)		—			—			12.64
Stock-based compensation		3.37			—			—			—			3.37
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of divestitures		6(4.54	)		(3142.42	)		(2033.51	)		—			(4579.47	)
Net cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations		1(11.13	)		217.71			710.89			—			1116.67
Net cash used in operating activities – discontinued operations		—			(23.71	)		(0.1	)		—			(23.82	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1(11.13	)		—14.0			710.78			—			813.85
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment, net		—(0.8	)		(712.25	)		(34.03	)		—			(1017.26	)
Proceeds from disposition of healthcare businesses		—			11.2			—			—			11.2
Other investing activities		—(0.6	)		~~(0.2~~—	)		—			—			(0.26	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		—(1.4	)		3(1.83	)		(34.03	)		—			0(7.80	)
Financing activities:
Payments on capital leases and other obligations		—			(648.81	)		(0.79	)		—			(749.50	)
Advances to Parent		(1.7	)		4.5			(3.2	)		—			(0.4	)
Borrowings from revolving credit facility		35.0			—			—			—			35.0
Payment of financing costs and fees		(2.0	)		—			—			—			(2.0	)
Repayments of revolving credit facility		(14.0	)		—			—			—			(14.0	)
Advances to Parent		(38.1	)		39.4			(2.3	)		—			(1.0	)
Payment of financing costs and fees		(2.1	)		—			—			—			(2.1	)
Proceeds from sale of non-controlling interest		—			—			0.1			—			0.1
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—			—			(01.54	)		—			(01.54	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(319.72	)		(28.37	)		(4.35	)		—			(1032.34	)
Change in cash and cash equivalents		(231.69	)		14.50			02.40			—			(025.79	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31.9			(3.6	)		(1.9	)		—			26.4
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~29.3~~—		$	(20.14	)	$	(10.51	)	$	—		$	250.75

2123

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~Note~~ 11. ~~Stock~~ STOCK-~~Based~~BASED ~~Compensation~~COMPENSATION

The Parent issues stock-based awards to the Company’s employees from time to time, including stock options and other stock-based awards in accordance with the Parent’s various board-approved compensation plans. In April 2014, the Parent adopted the 2014 Stock Option Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which effectively replaced the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”). During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the Company incurred non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.21 million and $0.56 million, respectively. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, the Company incurred non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $30.24 million and $3.37 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is included in salaries and benefits in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Restricted Shares

The Parent’s restricted share awards, granted to certain of the Company’s employees, typically vest over a five year term. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, approximately ~~240~~716,000 restricted share awards issued by the Parent remained unvested. The Company expects approximately 527,000 of the unvested restricted shares to vest. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was approximately $1.0.8 million of estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to these outstanding restricted share awards. These costs are expected to be recognized by the Company over approximately 3.52 years.

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Parent issued to the Company’s employees approximately 18,~~259~~203,000 restricted shares, in connection with the Parent’s equity restructuring, as previously described in Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation, Recent Developments. The 18,~~259~~203,000 restricted shares vested immediately and included a cash payment of $1.8 million to partially reimburse employees for tax-related liabilities associated with the award. The Company ~~considers~~considered the cash-based incentive payment to be stock-based compensation that is included in salaries and benefits in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Stock Options

The Company records stock-based employee compensation for options granted using a Black-Scholes-Merton model. The following table sets forth the range of assumptions the Company has utilized in the Black-Scholes-Merton model.

Risk-free interest rate	2.14% to 2.31%	~~2.31%~~
Dividend yield	0%	0%
Volatility (annual)	30.0% to 35.0%	~~30.00%~~
Expected option life	6.5 years	~~6.5 years~~

For stock-based awards included in the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, the Company uses historical stock price information of certain peer group companies for a period of time equal to the expected award life period to determine estimated volatility. The Company determined the expected life of the stock awards by averaging the contractual life of the awards and the vesting period of the awards. The estimated fair value of awards are amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the awards’ vesting period. Compensation cost related to stock-based awards will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures and actual results of performance measures.

The 2014 Plan permits the Parent’s board of directors to issue approximately 90.5 million stock options ~~and other stock-based awards~~ to the Company’s employees. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Parent issued to the Company’s employees 8889,~~775~~838,~~773~~000 stock options under the 2014 Plan. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, ~~after~~approximately ~~the~~525,000 ~~issuance~~options ofhave ~~88,775,773~~been ~~options,~~forfeited and the Parent ~~had~~has the ability to issue approximately ~~1.8 million~~689,000 additional stock based awards under the 2014 Plan. The stock options vest over five years. The Parent’s options outstanding have an exercise price of $0.16 per option. The Black-Sholes-Merton valuation model indicated that the fair value of options granted during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, at $0.06 per option. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, no options were vested, and the Company expects approximately ~~58,625,811~~74.5 million options ~~will~~to vest over the life of the awards. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was approximately $34.21 million of estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over approximately 4.86 years.

2224

Capella Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~ September 30, 2014

~~Note~~ 12. SUBSEQUENT ~~Subsequent~~EVENT ~~Event~~

In ~~July~~October 2014, the Company ~~exercised~~signed ~~its~~an ~~purchase~~agreement ~~option~~with ~~for~~subsidiaries ~~approximately~~of ~~$39.4~~Community ~~million,~~Health ~~excluding other costs and fees~~Systems, ~~to acquire~~Inc. ~~certain tangible assets of Muskogee Community Hospital~~ (~~“MCH”~~NYSE: CYH) ~~that were subject~~ to acquire a ~~capital~~controlling ~~lease.~~ownership ~~Additionally,~~interest in ~~July~~Carolina ~~2014,~~Pines ~~the~~Regional ~~Company~~Medical ~~repaid~~Center ~~the~~(“Carolina ~~outstanding~~Pines”), ~~principal~~a ~~balance~~116-bed ~~for~~acute ~~the~~care ~~promissory~~facility ~~note~~located ~~previously issued~~ in ~~connection~~ ~~with the Company’s July 2012 acquisition of accounts receivable~~Hartsville, ~~supplies,~~South ~~inventory~~Carolina, ~~goodwill~~ and ~~other~~its ~~intangible assets~~ related tooutpatient ~~MCH~~services. The ~~Company~~transaction ~~used~~is ~~$5.3~~subject ~~million~~to customary inregulatory ~~available~~approvals, ~~cash~~ and ~~cash~~is ~~equivalents,~~expected ~~including~~to ~~utilizing $35.0~~be ~~million~~completed in ~~availability from its 2010 Revolving Facility, to fund~~ the ~~purchase~~fourth ~~and~~quarter ~~repayment. As~~ of ~~June 30,~~ 2014, ~~the~~or ~~Company included~~ the ~~$38.9~~first ~~million~~quarter ~~capital~~of ~~lease liability and the $1~~2015.7 ~~million~~Carolina ~~note~~Pines ~~payable,~~will inbe ~~the~~divested ~~current~~by ~~portion~~a subsidiary of ~~long-term~~ ~~debt~~Community onHealth ~~the~~Systems, ~~accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets~~Inc. ~~After giving effect~~ to ~~the~~fulfill ~~Company’s~~requirements ~~July~~set ~~2014~~by ~~utilization of $35.0 million in availability under~~ the ~~2010 Revolving Facility, the Company’s outstanding debt would~~Federal ~~have~~Trade ~~been~~Commission ~~approximately~~during ~~$545.6 million and~~ the ~~Company~~acquisition ~~would have had $29.9 million~~ of ~~borrowing~~Health ~~capacity~~Management ~~under the 2010 Revolving Facility~~Associates, ~~net of outstanding letters of credit~~Inc.

2325

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with (i) our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report and (ii) our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). We intend for this discussion to provide you with information that will assist you in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from period to period, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes. The discussion consists of the following sections:

•

Forward Looking Statements;

•

Executive Overview;

•

Critical Accounting Policies;

•

Results of Operations Summary; and

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Unless the context requires otherwise, Capella Healthcare, Inc. and its subsidiaries are referred to in this section as “Capella,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our.”

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report and other materials the Company has filed or may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made, or to be made, by executive management of the Company, contain, or will contain, disclosures that are “forward-looking statements,” which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are those statements that are based upon management’s current plans and expectations as opposed to historical and current facts and are often identified in this discussion by use of words, including but not limited to, “may,” “believe,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” and “plan.” These statements are based upon estimates and assumptions made by Capella’s management that, although believed to be reasonable, are subject to numerous factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

In this report, for example, we make forward-looking statements, including statements discussing our expectations about: our business strategy and operating philosophy, including efforts to provide high quality patient care and service excellence, investments in technology, recruitment and retention of physicians and nurses, expansion of service lines, and growth strategies for existing markets and for potential acquisitions; future financial performance and condition; industry and general economic trends, changes to reimbursement, patient volumes and related revenues; provisions for potential adjustments to reimbursement amounts; our compliance with new and existing laws and regulations, as well as costs and benefits associated with compliance; effects of competition and consolidation on our hospitals’ markets; costs of providing care to our patients; the provision for bad debts and the impact of bad debt expenses; compliance with and anticipated revenues from Medicare and Medicaid electronic health records (“EHR”) incentive payments; future liquidity and capital resources; and existing and future debt.

There are several factors, some beyond our control that could cause results to differ significantly from our expectations. Any factor described in this report and the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K could by itself, or together with one or more factors, adversely affect our business, results of operations and/or financial condition. There may be factors not described in this report or the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K that could also cause results to differ from our expectations. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. We cannot predict such new risk factors nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements.

~~EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW~~26

toEXECUTIVE ~~maximize~~OVERVIEW their potential to deliver high quality care in a patient-friendly environment. We invest our financial and operational resources to establish and support services that meet the needs of our communities. We seek to achieve our objectives by providing exceptional quality care to our patients, establishing strong local management teams, physician leadership groups and hospital boards, developing deep physician and employee relationships and working closely with our communities.

We are a provider of general and specialized acute care, outpatient and other medically necessary services in primarily non-urban communities. We provide these services through a portfolio of acute care hospitals and complementary outpatient facilities and clinics in six states. As of September 30, 2014, as part of continuing operations, we operated 11 acute care hospitals (ten of which we own and one of which we lease pursuant to a long-term lease) comprised of 1,496 licensed beds. We are focused on enabling our facilities to maximize their potential to deliver high quality care in a patient-friendly environment. We invest our financial and operational resources to establish and support services that meet the needs of our communities. We seek to achieve our objectives by providing exceptional quality care to our patients, establishing strong local management teams, physician leadership groups and hospital boards, developing deep physician and employee relationships and working closely with our communities.

Equity Restructuring

During April 2014, Capella Holdings, Inc. (our “Parent”) completed an equity restructuring that included the conversion of $206.7 million preferred stock outstanding to a net 686.3 million shares of our Parent’s common stock and the forgiveness of $140.1 million of previously accrued dividends accreted as of March 31, 2014. The forgiveness of the previously accrued dividends effectively decreased the leverage of our Parent’s consolidated financial position and increased the value of stock-based awards issued by our Parent to our employees. See Note 11. Stock-Based Compensation, for additional information surrounding the issuance of stock-based awards by our Parent to our employees during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

2010 Revolving Facility Amendment

In June 2014, we amended (the “ABL Amendment”) the terms of our senior secured asset-based loan agreement, consisting of a $100 million revolving credit facility previously maturing in December 2014 (the “2010 Revolving Facility”). The ABL Amendment extended the maturity date of the 2010 Revolving Facility to the earlier of June 3, 2019 or April 1, 2017, if, as of such date, the Company’s 9 1⁄4% senior unsecured notes due 2017 (the “9 1⁄4 % Notes”) have not been repaid or refinanced on terms satisfactory to Bank of America, N.A. ~~Our~~We ~~management~~believe ~~believes~~that the ABL Amendment generally allows for greater operational flexibility on terms more favorable to us. See Note 9. Debt Obligations, 2010 Revolving Credit Facility and Amendment, for additional information.

MCH Capital Lease and Promissory Note

During July 2014, we exercised a purchase option for approximately $39.4 million, excluding other costs and fees, to acquire certain tangible assets of MCH that were subject to a capital lease. Additionally, in July 2014, we repaid the outstanding principal balance for the promissory note previously issued in connection with our July 2012 acquisition of accounts receivable, supplies, inventory, goodwill and other intangible assets related to MCH. We used $5.3 million in available cash and cash equivalents and $35.0 million in availability from its 2010 Revolving Facility to fund the purchase and repayment. Since July 2014, we have repaid $14.0 million on the 2010 Revolving Facility to reduce the outstanding balance due under the 2010 Revolving Facility to $21.0 million at September 30, 2014.

Pending Hospital Acquisition

In October 2014, we signed an agreement with subsidiaries of Community Health Systems, Inc. (NYSE: CYH) to acquire a controlling ownership interest in Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center (“Carolina Pines”), a 116-bed acute care facility located in Hartsville, South Carolina, and its related outpatient services. The transaction is subject to customary regulatory approvals, and is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2014 or the first quarter of 2015. Carolina Pines will be divested by a subsidiary of Community Health Systems, Inc. to fulfill requirements set by the Federal Trade Commission during the acquisition of Health Management Associates, Inc.

Trends and Developments

The following sections discuss trends and developments that we believe impact our current and/or future operating results and cash flows. Certain of these trends and developments apply to the entire hospital industry, while others may apply to us more specifically. These trends and developments could be short-term in nature or could require long-term attention and resources. While these trends and developments may involve certain factors that are outside of our control, the extent to which they affect our hospitals and our ability to manage the impact of these trends and developments play vital roles in our current and future success. In many cases, we are unable to predict what impact, if any, these trends and developments will have on us.

~~Impact~~27 ~~of Healthcare Reform~~

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Affordable Care Act”) were signed into law on March 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010, respectively. The Affordable Care Act dramatically altered the United States healthcare system and is intended to decrease the number of uninsured Americans and reduce the overall cost of healthcare. The Affordable Care Act attempts to achieve these goals by, among other things, requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance, expanding Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, reducing Medicare disproportionate share (“DSH”) payments and Medicaid payments to providers, expanding the Medicare program’s use of value-based purchasing programs, tying hospital payments to the satisfaction of certain quality criteria, bundling payments to hospitals and other providers, and instituting certain private health insurance reforms. Although a majority of the measures contained in the Affordable Care Act do not take effect until 2014 or later, certain of the reductions in Medicare spending, such as negative adjustments to the Medicare hospital inpatient and outpatient prospective payment system market basket updates and the incorporation of productivity adjustments to the Medicare program’s annual inflation updates, became effective at various times between 2010 and 2013. Additionally, a number of provisions of the Affordable Care Act that were supposed to become effective in 2014, such as the employer mandate (which requires employers with 50 or more full-time employees or full-time equivalents to provide affordable health insurance to those employees), the Small Business Health Option Program, and the state run exchange verification of income and Medicaid agency electronic notification of eligibility for tax credit and subsidy requirements, have been delayed until 2015 or 2016. More delays in the implementation of these or other provisions of the Affordable Care Act could be imposed in the future.

The Affordable Care Act has been the subject of numerous legal and legislative challenges, and several bills have been and will likely continue to be introduced in Congress to delay, defund, repeal or amend all or significant provisions of the Affordable Care Act. For example, on June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court upheld the “individual mandate” provision of the Affordable Care Act that generally requires all individuals to obtain healthcare insurance or pay a penalty. The Supreme Court also held, however, that the provision of the Affordable Care Act that authorized the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to penalize states that choose not to participate in the expansion of the Medicaid program by removing all existing Medicaid funding was unconstitutional. In response to the ruling, a number of states have already indicated that they will not expand their Medicaid

~~programs.~~Impact Doing so results in the Affordable Care Act not providing coverage to some low-income persons in those states. Additionally, on June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that private closely-held corporations may opt out of ~~the~~Healthcare ~~Affordable~~Reform Care Act’s provisions for certain no-cost prescription contraception if such corporations have religious objections to the contraception. More private corporations may file suit to challenge other aspects of the Affordable Care Act.

~~Most~~The ~~recently~~Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Affordable Care Act”) were signed into law on ~~July~~March 2223, ~~2014~~2010 and March 30, ~~two~~2010, ~~federal~~respectively. ~~appeals~~The ~~courts~~Affordable ~~issued~~Care ~~conflicting rulings~~Act ~~regarding~~dramatically ~~whether~~altered ~~financial~~the ~~subsidies~~United ~~can~~States behealthcare ~~offered~~system toand ~~health~~is ~~plan~~intended ~~purchasers~~to ~~through~~decrease the ~~federally-run~~number ~~health~~of ~~insurance~~uninsured ~~exchanges~~Americans ~~under~~and reduce the overall cost of healthcare. The Affordable Care Act. ~~Reversing~~attempts ~~the~~to ~~U.S.~~achieve ~~District~~these ~~Court~~goals ~~for~~by, ~~the~~among ~~District~~other ofthings, ~~Columbia~~requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance, expanding Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, reducing Medicare disproportionate share (“DSH”) payments and Medicaid payments to providers, expanding the Medicare program’s ~~grant~~use of value-based purchasing programs, tying hospital payments to the satisfaction of certain quality criteria, bundling ~~summary~~payments ~~judgment~~to ~~earlier~~hospitals ~~this~~and ~~year~~other providers, ~~the~~and ~~U.S.~~instituting ~~Court~~certain ofprivate ~~Appeals~~health ~~for~~insurance ~~District~~reforms. Although a majority of ~~Columbia~~the ~~ruled~~measures ~~that~~contained in the ~~government~~Affordable ~~may~~Care Act either did not ~~offer~~take ~~subsidies~~effect ~~for~~until ~~health~~2014 ~~insurance~~or ~~purchased~~do onnot take effect until later, certain of the ~~federally-run~~reductions ~~exchanges.~~in ~~Conversely~~Medicare spending, such as negative adjustments to the ~~U.S.~~Medicare ~~Court~~hospital inpatient and outpatient prospective payment system market basket updates and the incorporation of ~~Appeals~~productivity ~~for~~adjustments to the Medicare ~~Fourth~~program’s ~~Circuit~~annual ~~upheld~~inflation ~~the~~updates, ~~subsidies~~became effective at various times between 2010 and 2013. ~~Out~~Additionally, a number of provisions of the ~~nearly~~Affordable ~~seven~~Care ~~million~~Act ~~individuals~~that ~~who~~were ~~have~~supposed ~~received~~to ~~subsidies,~~become ~~approximately~~effective ~~five~~in ~~million~~2014, ofsuch ~~them~~as ~~were~~the ~~from~~employer ~~states~~mandate (which requires employers with ~~federally~~50 or more full-~~run~~time employees or full-time equivalents to provide affordable health insurance ~~exchanges.~~to Ifthose ~~subsidies~~employees), ~~were~~the ~~unavailable~~Small ~~for~~Business ~~those individuals~~Health ~~purchasing~~Option ~~insurance~~Program, ~~through~~and the ~~federally-~~state run ~~health~~exchange ~~insurance~~verification ~~exchanges,~~of itincome isand ~~likely~~Medicaid agency ~~that~~electronic ~~many~~notification of ~~those~~eligibility ~~individuals~~for ~~would~~tax ~~forgo~~credit ~~coverage~~and subsidy requirements, ~~thereby~~have ~~increasing~~been delayed until 2015 or 2016. More delays in the ~~number~~implementation of ~~uninsured.~~these or other provisions of the Affordable Care Act could be imposed in the future.

ItThe isAffordable ~~difficult~~Care toAct ~~predict~~has been the ~~full~~subject ~~impact~~ of ~~the~~numerous ~~Affordable~~legal ~~Care~~and ~~Act~~legislative ~~because~~challenges, ofand ~~its~~several ~~complexity,~~bills ~~lack~~have ofbeen ~~implementing~~and ~~regulations~~will ~~and~~likely ~~interpretive~~continue ~~guidance,~~to ~~state~~be ~~decisions~~introduced toin ~~decline~~Congress ~~Medicaid~~to ~~expansion~~delay, ~~gradual~~defund, ~~and~~repeal ~~delayed~~or ~~implementation,~~amend ~~potential~~all ~~legal~~or ~~challenges,~~significant ~~and~~provisions ~~possible~~of ~~defunding,~~the ~~repeal~~Affordable ~~and/or~~Care ~~amendment~~Act. For example, ason ~~well~~June 28, as2012, the ~~inability~~United toStates ~~foresee~~Supreme ~~how~~Court ~~individuals~~upheld ~~and~~the ~~businesses~~“individual mandate” provision ~~will~~of ~~respond~~the Affordable Care Act that generally requires all individuals to ~~the~~obtain ~~choices~~healthcare ~~afforded~~insurance ~~them~~or bypay a penalty. The Supreme Court also held, however, that the provision of the Affordable Care Act. ~~During~~that authorized the ~~first~~Secretary ~~half~~of the Department of ~~2014,~~Health and ~~primarily~~Human asServices a(“HHS”) ~~result~~to ofpenalize states that choose not to participate in the expansion of ~~health~~the ~~insurance~~Medicaid ~~coverage,~~program weby ~~experienced~~removing anall ~~increase~~existing inMedicaid ~~revenues~~funding ~~from~~was ~~providing~~unconstitutional. ~~care~~In response to ~~certain~~the ruling, a number of states ~~previously~~have ~~uninsured~~already ~~individuals~~indicated that they will not expand their Medicaid programs. ~~While~~Doing weso ~~expect~~results ~~this~~in ~~trend~~the Affordable Care Act not providing coverage to ~~continue~~some low-income persons in those states. Additionally, on June 30, 2014, the ~~future~~Supreme ~~impact~~Court ~~and~~ruled that ~~timing~~private closely-held corporations may opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s provisions for certain no-cost prescription contraception if such ~~expansion~~corporations ~~remains~~have ~~difficult~~religious objections to ~~predict,~~the ~~will~~contraception. beMore ~~gradual~~private ~~and~~corporations may ~~not~~file suit ~~offset~~to ~~scheduled~~challenge ~~decreases~~other inaspects ~~reimbursement~~of the Affordable Care Act.

Most recently, on July 22, 2014, two federal appeals courts issued conflicting rulings regarding whether financial subsidies can be offered to health plan purchasers through the federally-run health insurance exchanges under the Affordable Care Act. Reversing the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia’s grant of summary judgment earlier this year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia ruled that the government may not offer subsidies for health insurance purchased on the federally-run exchanges. Conversely, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the subsidies. The unavailability of subsidies for those individuals purchasing insurance through the federally-run health insurance exchanges likely would result in many of those individuals dropping their coverage, thereby increasing the number of uninsured.

It is difficult to predict the full impact of the Affordable Care Act because of its complexity, lack of implementing regulations and interpretive guidance, state decisions to decline Medicaid expansion, gradual and delayed implementation, potential legal challenges, and possible defunding, repeal and/or amendment, as well as the inability to foresee how individuals and businesses will respond to the choices afforded them by the Affordable Care Act. During the first nine months of 2014, and primarily as a result of the expansion of health insurance coverage, we experienced an increase in revenues from providing care to certain previously uninsured individuals. While we expect this trend to continue, the future impact and timing of such expansion remains difficult to predict, will be gradual and may not offset scheduled decreases in reimbursement.

Adoption of Electronic Health Records

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (the “HITECH Act”), which was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, includes provisions designed to increase the use of computerized physician order entry at hospitals and the use of EHR by both physicians and hospitals. We intend to comply with the EHR meaningful use requirements of the HITECH Act in time to qualify for the maximum available Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. We will recognize income related to the Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments as we are able to satisfy all appropriate contingencies, which includes completing attestations as to our eligible hospitals adopting, implementing or demonstrating meaningful use of certified EHR technology, and additionally for Medicare incentive payments, deferring income until the related Medicare fiscal year has passed and cost report information used to determine the final amount of reimbursement is known. Our compliance has resulted in significant costs including professional services focused on successfully designing and implementing our EHR solutions along with costs associated with the hardware and software components of the project. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $0.3 million of other income from continuing operations related to estimated EHR incentive payments. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized $3.0 million and $4.3 million, respectively, of other income from continuing operations related to estimated EHR incentive payments. We currently estimate that, at a minimum, the total costs incurred to comply will be recovered through this initiative.

to increase the use of computerized physician order entry at hospitals and the use of EHR by both physicians and hospitals. We intend to comply with the EHR meaningful use requirements of the HITECH Act in time to qualify for the maximum available Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. We will recognize income related to the Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments as we are able to satisfy all appropriate contingencies, which includes completing attestations as to our eligible hospitals adopting, implementing or demonstrating meaningful use of certified EHR technology, and additionally for Medicare incentive payments, deferring income until the related Medicare fiscal year has passed and cost report information used to determine the final amount of reimbursement is known. Our compliance has resulted in significant costs including professional services focused on successfully designing and implementing our EHR solutions along with costs associated with the hardware and software components of the project. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recognized $5.2 million and $5.5 million, respectively, of other income from continuing operations related to estimated EHR incentive payments. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized $5.6 million and $9.9 million, respectively, of other income from continuing operations related to estimated EHR incentive payments. We currently estimate that, at a minimum, the total costs incurred to comply will be recovered through this initiative.

Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement

Medicare payment methodologies have been, and are expected to be, significantly revised based on cost containment and policy considerations. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has already begun to implement some of the Medicare reimbursement reductions required by the Affordable Care Act. These revisions will likely be more frequent and significant as more of the Affordable Care Act’s changes and cost-saving measures become effective.

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 and the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (“ATRA”) require further reductions in Medicare payments. ATRA also requires CMS to recoup $11 billion from Inpatient Prospective Payment System (“IPPS”) payments in federal fiscal year (“FFY”) 2014 through FFY 2017 to offset an additional increase in aggregate payments to hospitals that Congress believes represent overpayments resulting from documentation and coding adjustments from the implementation of the MS-DRG system. ~~CMS has not yet indicated how or when the additional adjustments required by ATRA will be implemented.~~ The Budget Control Act of 2011 (“BCA”) also imposed a 2% reduction in Medicare spending effective as of April 1, 2013. The automatic spending cuts are known as “Sequestration.”

On March 4, 2014, the Office of Management and Budget released President Obama’s proposed budget for FFY 2015 (the “Proposed Budget”). Among other things, the Proposed Budget would reduce Medicare spending by $400 billion from FFY 2015 to FFY 2024. The Proposed Budget would achieve these reductions by, among other things, reducing payments to Medicare providers, reducing payments for prescription drugs covered under Medicare Part B and Part D, and increasing financial liabilities for certain Medicare beneficiaries. We cannot predict whether the Proposed Budget will be implemented in whole or in part or whether Congress will take other legislative action to reduce spending on the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Additionally, future efforts to reduce the federal deficit may result in additional revisions to and payment reductions for the amounts we receive for our services.

26On August 22, 2014, CMS published the hospital IPPS final rule for FFY 2015, which began on October 1, 2014. Under the final rule, the operating payment rates for inpatient stays in general acute care hospitals paid under the IPPS that successfully participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (“IQR”) Program and are meaningful EHR users are increased by 1.4%. This increase reflects the hospital market basket update of 2.9%, adjusted by -0.5 percentage points for multi-factor productivity and an additional -0.2 percentage points in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. Additionally, the rate is further decreased by 0.8% for a proposed documentation and coding recoupment adjustment required by the ATRA. Those hospitals that do not successfully participate in the Hospital IQR Program and do not submit the required quality data will be subject to a one-fourth reduction of the market basket update (previously these hospitals received a 2 percentage point reduction). In addition, any hospital that is not a meaningful EHR user will be reduced by one-fourth of the market basket update in FFY 2015, one-half of the market basket update in FFY 2016, and three-fourths of the market basket update in FFY 2017 and later years. With respect to the documentation and coding recoupment adjustment required by the ATRA, CMS made a -0.8 percent recoupment adjustment to the standardized amount in FFY 2014, and has indicated that it expects to make similar adjustments in FFY 2016 and FFY 2017 in order to recoup the entire $11 billion that is required to be recovered by the ATRA to offset the additional increase in aggregate payments to hospitals that Congress believes occurred from FFY 2008 through FFY 2013 as a result of the transition to the MS-DRG system that do not reflect real changes in case-mix, and that was not recaptured by the adjustments that were mandated by the Transitional Medical Assistance, Abstinence Education, and Qualifying Individuals Programs Extension Act of 2007.

In addition to establishing the payment rate update, the IPPS final rule for FFY 2015 also makes a number of other changes to the Medicare program’s IPPS. Among other things, the final rule implements a 1.0% payment decrease required by the Affordable Care Act for those hospitals that rank in the top quartile for the rate of hospital acquired conditions, and updates the measures and financial incentives in Medicare’s hospital value-based purchasing and readmissions reduction

On programs. ~~May 15,~~The ~~2014, CMS published its hospital~~ IPPS ~~proposed~~final rule for FFY 2015, ~~which~~updates ~~begins on October 1, 2014, that would update FFY 2015 Medicare IPPS payment policies and rates and~~ the ~~Long-Term~~factors ~~Care~~used ~~Hospital~~to ~~Prospective~~determine ~~Payment System. Under~~ the ~~proposed~~amount ~~rule,~~and ~~the~~distribution ~~operating~~of ~~payment~~Medicare ~~rates~~DSH ~~for~~payments ~~inpatient~~to ~~stays in general acute care~~ hospitals ~~paid under the IPPS that successfully participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (“IQR”) Program~~ and ~~are~~establishes ~~meaningful EHR users would be increased by 1.3%. This increase reflects~~ the ~~projected~~uncompensated ~~hospital~~care ~~market basket~~amount ~~update~~which ofwill ~~2.7%,~~be ~~adjusted~~distributed byto ~~-0.4~~qualifying ~~percentage~~hospitals ~~points for multi-factor productivity and an additional -0.2 percentage points~~ in ~~accordance~~FFY ~~with~~2015 ~~the~~at ~~Affordable Care Act~~$7.65 ~~Additionally~~billion, ~~the~~which ~~rate~~ is ~~further decreased by 0.8% for~~ a ~~proposed~~decrease ~~documentation and~~from ~~coding~~the ~~recoupment~~$8.56 ~~adjustment~~billion ~~required~~estimate byin the ~~ATRA.~~IPPS ~~Beginning~~proposed ~~with~~rule for FFY 2015, ~~those~~which ~~hospitals~~was ~~that~~published doon ~~not~~May 15, ~~successfully~~2014. ~~participate~~This indecrease ~~the~~is ~~Hospital~~due ~~IQR Program and do not submit the required quality data will be subject~~ to achanges ~~one-fourth~~in estimates ~~reduction~~ of ~~the~~ ~~market~~payments ~~basket~~that ~~update (previously these hospitals received a 2 percentage point reduction). The proposed rule~~ would ~~also~~otherwise ~~require~~be ~~that~~made ~~the update~~ for ~~any~~Medicare ~~hospital~~DSH ~~that is not a meaningful EHR user will be reduced by one-fourth of the market basket update~~ in FFY 2015, ~~one-half~~(due ofto ~~the~~lower ~~market~~projected ~~basket~~hospital ~~update~~inpatient inspending) ~~FFY 2016,~~ and ~~three-fourths~~also of the ~~market~~change ~~basket update~~ in ~~FFY~~the ~~2017~~percentage ~~and~~of ~~later~~individuals ~~years.~~that ~~Overall IPPS payments (capital and operating payments)~~ are ~~projected~~uninsured toas ~~decrease~~estimated by ~~$241 million under~~ the ~~proposed~~Congressional rule. In the IPPS proposed rule, CMS also solicited comments regarding the development of an alternative payment methodology under the Medicare program for short inpatient hospital stays. Specifically, CMS is seeking input on howBudget ~~to both define and pay for short inpatient hospital stays~~Office.

The IPPS final rule for FFY 2015 also revises the labor market areas used for the IPPS wage index system based on the most recent core-based statistical area delineations issued by the Office of Management and Budget based on 2010 census data. Under the final rule, in order to mitigate the potentially negative impacts of the new labor market areas, CMS will generally phase in the new wage index over a one year transition period, with the wage index for FFY 2015 being a 50/50 blend of the former wage index and the new wage index. The new wage index will take effect in full in FFY 2016. Overall, CMS estimates that the rate increase, when combined with reductions under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, changes to Medicare DSH payments, the expiration of certain statutory provisions that provided special temporary increases in payments to low-volume and Medicare dependent hospitals, and other changes to IPPS payment policies, will decrease IPPS payments to hospitals by 0.6%, or $756 million, in FFY 2015.

On July 14, 2014, CMS published its hospital outpatient prospective payment system (“OPPS”) proposed rule for calendar year (“CY”) 2015, which begins on January 1, 2015. Among other things, the proposed rule provides for a payment rate increase of 2.1% percent for hospitals that meet the reporting requirements of the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program and a payment rate increase of 0.1% for hospitals that do not. The proposed rate increase is based on a projected hospital market basket increase of 2.7%, adjusted by -0.4 percentage points for multi-factor productivity and an additional -0.2 percentage points in accordance with the Affordable Care Act.

The OPPS proposed rule also makes several other changes, including implementing (with modifications) the policy for comprehensive Ambulatory Payment Classifications (“APCs”) that was finalized in the OPPS final rule for CY 2014. CMS created the comprehensive APCs to prospectively pay under the OPPS for high cost device dependent services using a single payment for the hospital stay. The OPPS proposed rule would create 28 comprehensive APCs that combine certain items and services that are related to the performance of a primary service into a single payment for the comprehensive service under the OPPS. Additional changes to the Medicare program’s OPPS include revising the physician certification requirement for hospital inpatient services and requiring hospitals and physicians to provide additional information about services provided in off-campus provider-based departments on their claim forms.

In addition to the Medicare reimbursement reductions and policy considerations described above, many states in which we operate are facing budgetary challenges and have adopted, or may be considering, legislation that is intended to control or reduce Medicaid expenditures, enroll Medicaid recipients in managed care programs, and/or impose additional taxes on hospitals to help finance or expand their Medicaid programs. Budget cuts, federal or state legislation, or other changes in the administration or interpretation of government health programs by government agencies or contracted managed care organizations could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

“Two Midnight Rule”

In the Medicare program’s hospital IPPS final rule for FFY 2014, CMS issued the “two midnight rule,” which modified CMS’s policy on how Medicare contractors will review inpatient hospital services for payment purposes. Under the two midnight rule, in addition to services designated by CMS as inpatient-only services, surgical procedures, diagnostic tests, and other treatments will generally be considered to be appropriate for inpatient admission and inpatient hospital payment under Medicare Part A when the treating physician expects the beneficiary to require a stay that crosses at least two midnights and admits the beneficiary to the hospital based on that expectation. As for medical review, the IPPS final rule for FFY 2014 establishes a presumption that inpatient hospital claims with lengths of stay greater than two midnights will be presumed generally appropriate for reimbursement under Medicare Part A. However, inpatient hospital claims with lengths of stay less than two midnights after the formal admission following the order will not be subject to that presumption and may be reviewed by Medicare contractors and recovery auditors for appropriateness for Medicare Part A payment. The IPPS final rule for FFY 2014 requires Medicare review contractors and recovery auditors reviewing such claims to evaluate the physician order for admission as well as certain medical documentation.

While the IPPS final rule for FFY 2014 became effective on October 1, 2013, CMS initially indicated on November 5, 2013 that it would not permit recovery auditors to review inpatient admissions of one midnight or less that began between October 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. CMS subsequently extended that delay to inpatient admissions that occur on or

2730

~~and December 31, 2013. CMS subsequently extended that delay to inpatient admissions that occur on or~~ prior to September 30, 2014. CMS did, however, instruct Medicare Administrative Contractors to review, on a pre-payment basis, a small sample of inpatient hospital claims relating to admissions that occur between March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 and that span less than two midnights after admission to determine a hospital’s compliance with the new criteria. Hospitals can rebill denied inpatient hospital admissions in accordance with the rule.

On April 1, 2014, President Obama signed the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (“PAMA”) into law. Among other things, PAMA extends the delay of the enforcement of the two midnight rule by recovery auditors and other Medicare review contractors through March 31, 2015. PAMA also authorizes CMS to continue to allow Medicare Administrative Contractors to review, on a pre-payment basis only, a small sample of inpatient hospital claims relating to admissions that span less than two midnights and that occur between March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015 in order to determine hospital compliance with the new inpatient admission and medical review criteria. Post-payment reviews are not allowed unless there is evidence of systematic gaming, fraud, abuse, or delays.

In April 2014, the American Hospital Association and a coalition of its members filed two federal lawsuits related to the two midnight rule. One lawsuit challenged the rule itself, while the second sought to overturn the related rate cuts. In May 2014, the House Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health held a hearing regarding certain issues related to the Medicare program, including the two midnight rule. During the inquiry, the CMS Deputy Administrator noted that CMS is considering alternate ways of defining and paying for short hospital stays and is interested in soliciting comments regarding alternatives.

On May 15, 2014, in the IPPS proposed rule for FFY 2015, CMS solicited comments regarding the development of an alternative payment methodology under the Medicare program for short inpatient hospital stays. Specifically, CMS is seeking input on how to both define and pay for short inpatient hospital stays. In the IPPS final rule for FFY 2015, CMS indicated it would consider the comments received for purposes of future rulemaking.

In August 2014, in response to concerns that the two midnight rule has caused a growth in claim appeals, CMS announced that is now offering an administrative agreement to any hospital willing to withdraw its pending appeals in exchange for timely partial payment in an amount equal to 68% of the net allowable amount of all eligible claims. CMS has encouraged hospitals with inpatient status claims currently in the appeals process (or within the timeframe to request an appeal) to make use of this administrative agreement mechanism to alleviate the administrative burden of current appeals on both the hospital and Medicare systems. CMS has further advised that the agreement only applies to eligible claims from eligible providers, and specifies that “eligible claims” are those denied by a Medicare contractor on the basis that services may have been reasonable and necessary but treatment on an inpatient basis was not, that are either under appeal or within their administrative timeframe to request an appeal review, with dates of admissions prior to October 1, 2013, and where the claim was not paid under Medicare Part B. Acute care hospitals and critical access hospitals are eligible to submit a settlement request; psychiatric hospitals paid under the Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, cancer hospitals and children’s hospitals are not eligible. Hospitals have until October 31, 2014 to participate in the settlement, but may request an extension, if needed. CMS has advised that it will pay hospitals within 60 days of validating the eligible claims. As of September 30, 2014, we have elected to participate in the settlement and have recognized $1.2 million in revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations related to the eligible claims.

We cannot predict whether Congress or CMS will further delay the review of inpatient admissions of one midnight or less by recovery auditors or other Medicare review contractors or the impact that any such reviews will have on our business and results of operations, if and when they are allowed by CMS. Legislation has been introduced in Congress that, among other things, would generally prohibit Medicare review contractors from denying claims due to the length of a patient’s stay or a determination that services could have been provided in an outpatient setting and would require CMS to develop a new payment methodology for services that are provided during short inpatient hospital stays. In addition to the Congressional legislation, federal lawsuits have also been filed challenging the two midnight rule primarily on the grounds that the implementation of the rule itself, and the payment reduction associated with the rule violate the Administrative Procedure Act. We cannot predict whether the legislation that has been introduced in Congress will be adopted or, if adopted, the amount of reimbursement that would be paid under any alternative payment methodology that is developed by CMS. We also cannot predict whether the federal court challenges to the two midnight rule will be successful.

Value-Based Reimbursement

The trend in the healthcare industry continues towards value-based purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting and financial incentives tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. The Affordable Care Act expands the use of value based purchasing initiatives in federal healthcare programs. We expect programs of this type to become more common in the healthcare industry.

~~Medicare~~31 requires providers to report certain quality measures in order to receive full reimbursement increases for inpatient and outpatient procedures that previously were awarded automatically. Historically, CMS has expanded, through a series of rulemakings, the number of patient care indicators that hospitals must report. Additionally, we anticipate that CMS will continue to expand the number of inpatient and outpatient quality measures. We have invested significant capital and resources in the implementation of our advanced clinical system that assists us in monitoring and reporting these quality measures. CMS makes the data submitted by hospitals, including our hospitals, public on its website.

~~the~~Medicare ~~Affordable~~requires ~~Care~~providers ~~Act~~to ~~contains~~report acertain ~~number~~quality ofmeasures ~~other~~in ~~provisions~~order ~~that~~to ~~further~~receive ~~tie~~ full reimbursement toincreases ~~quality~~for inpatient and ~~efficiency.~~outpatient ~~Hospitals~~procedures that ~~have~~previously ~~“excess~~were ~~readmissions”~~awarded ~~for specified conditions receive reduced reimbursement~~automatically. ~~Each hospital’s performance is publicly reported~~Historically, ~~and~~CMS ~~HHS~~ has ~~the~~expanded, ~~discretion~~through toa ~~determine~~series ~~terms~~of ~~and~~rulemakings, ~~conditions~~the number of ~~the~~patient ~~program,~~care ~~such~~indicators asthat ~~what~~hospitals ~~“excessive~~must ~~readmissions” means~~report. Additionally, ~~under the~~we ~~IPPS~~anticipate ~~proposed~~that ~~rule,~~ CMS ~~proposed~~will ~~expanding~~continue ~~the~~to ~~readmissions~~expand ~~measures~~the ~~for~~number ~~FFY~~of ~~2017~~inpatient and ~~subsequent~~outpatient ~~years,~~quality ~~as well as refining the readmission~~ measures. ~~and~~We ~~methodology~~have ~~for~~invested ~~FFY~~significant ~~2015~~capital and ~~subsequent~~resources ~~years.~~in ~~Medicare also no longer pays hospitals additional amounts for~~ the ~~treatment~~implementation of ~~certain~~our ~~hospital-acquired~~advanced ~~conditions~~clinical ~~(“HACs”)~~system ~~unless the conditions were present at admission. Further, beginning in FFY 2015, hospitals~~ that ~~rank~~assists inus ~~the worst 25% of all hospitals nationally for~~in ~~HACs~~monitoring inand ~~the~~reporting ~~previous~~these ~~year~~quality ~~will~~measures. ~~receive~~CMS ~~99%~~makes ~~of what they would otherwise be paid under~~ the ~~IPPS.~~data ~~CMS~~submitted ~~estimated~~by ~~that 753~~ hospitals, ~~would~~including beour ~~subject~~hospitals, topublic ~~this~~on ~~1.0%~~its ~~reduction and that overall payments will decrease approximately 0~~website.~~3%,~~ ~~or $330 million.~~

The Affordable Care Act requires HHS to implement a value-based purchasing program for inpatient hospital services. The Affordable Care Act also prohibits the use of federal funds under the Medicaid program to reimburse providers for treating certain provider-preventable conditions. In 2013, HHS began to reduce inpatient hospital payments for all discharges by a percentage specified by statute and pool the total amount collected from these reductions to fund payments to reward hospitals that meet or exceed certain quality performance standards established by HHS. For FFY 2014, CMS increased the applicable reductions to 1.25%. CMS will evaluate hospitals’ performance during a performance period, and hospitals will receive points on each of a number of pre-determined measures based on the higher of (i) their level of achievement relative to an established standard or (ii) their improvement in performance from their performance during a prior baseline period. Each hospital’s combined scores on all the measures are translated into value-based incentive payments. Under the IPPS proposed rule for FFY 2015 discussed above, CMS proposed increasing the applicable percent reduction to 1.5% for FFY 2015. CMS estimated that the total amount available for value-based incentive payments for FFY 2015 will be $1.4 billion. CMS also proposed making certain modifications to program measures. For the FFY 2016 hospital value-based purchasing program, CMS finalized removing three measures and adding four measures. In addition, the Affordable Care Act contains a number of other provisions that further tie reimbursement to quality and efficiency. Hospitals that have “excess readmissions” for specified conditions receive reduced reimbursement. Each hospital’s performance is publicly reported, and HHS has the discretion to determine terms and conditions of the program, such as what “excessive readmissions” means. Additionally, under the IPPS proposed rule, CMS proposed expanding the readmissions measures for FFY 2017 and subsequent years, as well as refining the readmission measures and methodology for FFY 2015 and subsequent years. Medicare also no longer pays hospitals additional amounts for the treatment of certain hospital-acquired conditions (“HACs”) unless the conditions were present at admission. Further, beginning in FFY 2015, hospitals that rank in the worst 25% of all hospitals nationally for HACs in the previous year will receive 99% of what they would otherwise be paid under the IPPS. CMS estimated that 753 hospitals would be subject to this 1.0% reduction and that overall payments will decrease approximately 0.3%, or $330 million.

Physician Services

Physician services are reimbursed under the Medicare physician fee schedule (“PFS”) system, under which CMS has assigned a national relative value unit (“RVU”) to most medical procedures and services that reflects the various resources required by a physician to provide the services relative to all other services. Each RVU is calculated based on a combination of work required in terms of time and intensity of effort for the service, practice expense (overhead) attributable to the service, and malpractice insurance expense attributable to the service. These three elements are each modified by a geographic adjustment factor to account for local practice costs. The modified elements are then aggregated, and the aggregated amount is multiplied by a conversion factor that accounts for inflation and targeted growth in Medicare expenditures (as calculated by the sustainable growth rate (“SGR”)) to arrive at the payment amount for each service.

The PFS rates are adjusted each year, and reductions in both current and future payments are anticipated. The SGR formula has resulted in payment decreases to physicians every year since 2002. However, all but one of those payment decreases has been averted by Congressional action. For CY 2014, CMS issued a final rule that would have applied the SGR and would have resulted in an aggregate reduction of 20.1% to all physician payments under the PFS for CY 2014. The Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013, which was enacted on December 26, 2013 (the “Pathway Act”), delayed the application of the SGR and provided for a 0.5% increase in PFS payment rates through March 31, 2014. PAMA, among other things, extended the 0.5% increase in PFS payment rates established by the Pathway Act through December 31, 2014. PAMA provides that there will be no increase to the CY 2015 PFS from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2015.

On February 2, 2014, the Senate Finance Committee, the House Ways and Means Committee, and the House Energy and Commerce Committee announced that they had agreed upon legislation, the SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment Modernization Act (the “SGR Repeal Act”), that would permanently repeal the SGR and establish a more streamlined and improved incentive payment program that will focus on providing value and quality. Under the SGR Repeal Act, physicians would receive an annual update of 0.5% for CY 2014 through CY 2018, CY 2018 payment rates would be maintained through CY 2023, and, beginning in 2018 through 2023, physicians would be given the opportunity to receive additional payment adjustments through a new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (“MIPS”). MIPS would consolidate three existing incentive programs and improve focus on quality, resource use, and meaningful EHR use. The SGR Repeal Act was passed by the House on March 14, 2014. We cannot predict whether the SGR Repeal Act will be passed by the Senate or, if passed, the impact the SGR Repeal Act would have on our revenues and results of operations.

maintained through CY 2023, and, beginning in 2018 through 2023, physicians would be given the opportunity to receive additional payment adjustments through a new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (“MIPS”). MIPS would consolidate three existing incentive programs and improve focus on quality, resource use, and meaningful EHR use. The SGR Repeal Act was passed by the House on March 14, 2014. We cannot predict whether the SGR Repeal Act will be passed by the Senate or, if passed, the impact the SGR Repeal Act would have on our revenues and results of operations.

On July 11, 2014, CMS published the PFS proposed rule for CY 2015. Since updates to the PFS are pre-determined based on a statutory formula that cannot be changed by CMS, the proposed rule did not include any proposal or announcement regarding updates or changes to the PFS. However, in March 2014 prior to the enactment of PAMA, CMS estimated that payments to physicians in CY 2015 would be reduced by 20.9%. The proposed rule also includes proposals for implementing the value-based payment modifier required by the Affordable Care Act, which would adjust payments to physicians, groups of physicians, and other eligible professionals based on the quality and cost of care they furnish to Medicare beneficiaries; and also proposes changes to several of the quality reporting initiatives that are associated with PFS payments.

We cannot predict whether Congress will pass legislation, such as the SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment Modernization Act, to avert the rate cute for the remainder of CY 2015 and/or otherwise adopt a permanent fix for the issues that are created by the application of the SGR. If the payment reduction to the PFS is not averted prior to March 31, 2015, the reimbursement received by our employed physicians, the physicians to whom our hospitals have provided recruitment assistance, and the physician members of our medical staffs would be adversely affected.

Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014

As previously noted, on April 1, 2014, President Obama signed in to law PAMA. In addition to delaying the enforcement of the two midnight rule and extending the PFS payment rate increase provided by the Pathway Act, PAMA made changes to a number of payment and other provisions of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Among other things, PAMA:

•

Extends the Medicare dependent hospital program, which provides enhanced payment support for rural hospitals that have no more than 100 beds and at least 60% of their inpatient days or discharges covered by the Medicare program, through March 31, 2015;

•

Extends the Medicare low volume hospital program, which provides additional Medicare reimbursement for general acute care hospitals that are located 15 road miles from another general acute care hospital and have less than 1,600 Medicare discharges each fiscal year, through March 31, 2015;

•

Extends the Transitional Medicare Assistance Program, which provides Medicaid insurance coverage for families transitioning from welfare to work, through March 31, 2015;

•

Establishes a value based purchasing program for skilled nursing facilities that, beginning October 1, 2018, will withhold 2% of the Medicare program’s payments to skilled nursing facilities and re-distribute between 50% to 70% of the withheld amount to high performing facilities with reduced hospital readmissions;

•

Delays until October 1, 2017, the Medicaid state DSH allotment reductions required by the Affordable Care Act that were scheduled to become effective on October 1, 2016, and extends those reductions through FFY 2024;

•

Realigns the Medicare sequester for FFY 2024 so that there will be a 4.0% sequester for the first six months of FFY 2024 and a 0.0% sequester for the second six months of FFY 2024, instead of a 2.0% sequester for the full 12-month period;

•

Extends the therapy cap exceptions process through March 31, 2015; and

•

Extends special payments to Medicare dependent hospitals (MDHs) through March 31, 2015.

Physician Alignment

Our ability to attract skilled physicians to our hospitals is critical to our success. Coordination of care and alignment of care strategies between hospitals and physicians will become more critical as reimbursement becomes more episode-based. We have physician recruitment goals with primary emphasis on recruiting physicians specializing in family practice, ~~internal~~ internal medicine, general surgery, oncology, obstetrics and gynecology, cardiology, neurology, orthopedics, urology, otolaryngology, and inpatient hospital care (hospitalists). To provide our patients access to the appropriate physician ~~resources,~~ we actively recruit physicians to the communities served by our hospitals through employment agreements, relocation agreements, or physician practice acquisitions. We seek to invest in the infrastructure necessary to coordinate our physician alignment strategies and manage our physician operations. The costs associated with recruiting, integrating, and managing a large number of new physicians will have a negative impact on our operating results and cash flows in the near term. However, we expect to realize improved clinical quality and service expansion capabilities from this initiative that will impact our operating results positively over the long term.

resources, we actively recruit physicians to the communities served by our hospitals through employment agreements, relocation agreements, or physician practice acquisitions. We seek to invest in the infrastructure necessary to coordinate our physician alignment strategies and manage our physician operations. The costs associated with recruiting, integrating, and managing a large number of new physicians will have a negative impact on our operating results and cash flows in the near term. However, we expect to realize improved clinical quality and service expansion capabilities from this initiative that will impact our operating results positively over the long term.

HIPAA

We are subject to the privacy and security requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and the HITECH Act, which are designed to protect the confidentiality, availability and integrity of health information. The HIPAA privacy and security regulations apply to health plans, health care clearinghouses, and healthcare providers that transmit health information in an electronic form in connection with HIPAA standard transactions. The HIPAA security standards require us to establish and maintain reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of electronic health and related financial information.

In January 2014, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) ruled that Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act gives the FTC the authority to regulate as unfair business practices companies’ inadequate data security programs that may expose consumers to fraud, identify theft, and privacy intrusions. On February 24, 2014, HHS announced its plan to survey 1200 organizations (both covered entities and business associates) as a first step in selecting organizations for the next round of HIPAA audits. HHS has advised that the survey will gather information to enable the Office of Civil Rights “to assess the size, complexity, and fitness of a respondent for an audit.” HHS has advised that the information to be collected will include, among other things, “recent data about the number of patient visits or insured lives, use of electronic information, revenues, and business locations.” We cannot predict whether our hospitals will be selected in the future for an audit or the results of such an audit. In addition, our facilities will continue to remain subject to any state laws that are more restrictive than the privacy regulations issued under HIPAA.

30On January 17, 2013, HHS issued a final rule that, among other things, made final modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Enforcement Rules mandated by the HITECH Act; adopted changes to the HIPAA Enforcement Rule to incorporate the increased and tiered civil money penalty structure provided by the HITECH Act; adopted a final rule on Breach Notification for Unsecured Protected Health Information that replaces the breach notification rule’s prior “harm” threshold with a more objective standard; and modified the HIPAA Privacy Rule as required by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. The new rules are effective as of March 26, 2013. Our facilities were required to comply with the applicable requirements of the Final HIPAA Rule by September 23, 2013, except that certain existing business associate agreements qualified for an extended compliance date of September 23, 2014. We cannot yet quantify the financial impact of compliance with these new regulations. We could, however, incur expenses associated with such compliance.

On January 17, 2013, HHS issued a final rule that, among other things, made final modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Enforcement Rules mandated by the HITECH Act; adopted changes to the HIPAA Enforcement Rule to incorporate the increased and tiered civil money penalty structure provided by the HITECH Act; adopted a final rule on Breach Notification for Unsecured Protected Health Information that replaces the breach notification rule’s prior “harm” threshold with a more objective standard; and modified the HIPAA Privacy Rule as required by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. The new rules are effective as of March 26, 2013. Our facilities were required to comply with the applicable requirements of the Final HIPAA Rule by September 23, 2013, except that existing business associate agreements may qualify for an extended compliance date of September 23, 2014. We cannot yet quantify the financial impact of compliance with these new regulations. We could, however, incur expenses associated with such compliance.

In addition to HIPAA’s privacy and security requirements, we are also subject to the administrative simplification provisions of HIPAA, which require the use of uniform electronic data transmission standards for healthcare claims and payment transactions submitted or received electronically. In January 2009, CMS published its 10th revision of International Statistical Classification of Diseases (“ICD-10”), which establishes an updated code set to be used for classifying health care diagnoses and procedures. Entities covered under HIPAA will be required to use the ICD-10, which contains significantly more diagnostic and procedural codes than the existing ICD-9 coding system. Because of the greater number of codes, the coding for the services provided in our facilities will require much greater specificity. Implementation of ICD-10 will require a significant investment in technology and training. We may experience delays in reimbursement while our facilities and the payors from which we seek reimbursement make the transition to ICD-10. While providers were previously required to begin using the ICD-10 coding system on October 1, 2014, PAMA delayed the effective date of the ICD-10 transition to October 1, 2015. If any of our facilities fail to implement the new coding system by the deadline, the affected facility will not be paid for services. We are not able to predict the timeframe or the overall financial impact of the transition to ICD-10.

Cost Pressures

In order to demonstrate a highly reliable environment of care, we must hire and retain nurses who share our ideals and beliefs with respect to delivering high quality patient care and who have access to the training necessary to implement our clinical quality initiatives. While the national nursing shortage has abated somewhat during the last year, the nursing workforce remains volatile. As a result, we expect continuing pressures on nursing salaries and benefits. These pressures include base wage increases, demands for flexible working hours and other increased benefits as well as higher nurse-to-patient ratios. In addition, inflationary pressures and technological advancements and increased acuity continue to drive supply costs higher. We utilize multiple supply chain initiatives, including consolidation of low-priced vendors, value analysis teams and coordinated quality of care efforts to encourage group purchasing contract compliance.

~~Uncompensated~~34 ~~Care~~

Like others in the hospital industry, we continue to experience high levels of uncompensated care, including charity care and bad debts. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, our uncompensated care as a percentage of revenues, which includes the impact of uninsured discounts and charity care, was 14.3%, compared to 23.4% during the same prior year period. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our uncompensated care as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in self-pay volumes due to healthcare reform and the expansion of Medicaid coverage in certain of the states in which we operate. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, our uncompensated care as a percentage of revenues was 17.2%, compared to 22.7% during the same prior year. These reductions partially offset trends our hospitals have experienced in recent years, including increases in self-pay revenues due to a combination of broad economic factors, including high levels of unemployment in many of our markets and increasing numbers of individuals and employers who choose not to purchase insurance or who purchase insurance plans with high deductibles.

~~Similar~~Uncompensated toCare others in the hospital industry, we have a significant amount of self-pay receivables (including co-payments and deductibles from insured patients), and collecting these receivables may become more difficult if economic conditions worsen. The following table provides a summary of our accounts receivable from continuing operations by payor class mix as of December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014:

December 31, 2013	0-90 Days			91-180 Days			Over 180 Days			Total
Medicare(1)		26.7	%		1.0	%		1.6	%		29.3	%
Medicaid(1)		6.7			0.7			0.6			8.0
Managed Care and Other		19.6			1.6			1.2			22.4
Self-Pay(2)		9.5			9.1			21.7			40.3
Total		62.5	%		12.4	%		25.1	%		100.0	%
June 30, 2014	0-90 Days			91-180 Days			Over 180 Days			Total
Medicare(1)		28.8	%		1.1	%		1.5	%		31.4	%
Medicaid(1)		7.4			1.1			1.1			9.6
Managed Care and Other		16.0			2.2			1.9			20.1
Self-Pay(2)		8.5			7.8			22.6			38.9
Total		60.7	%		12.2	%		27.1	%		100.0	%

Like others in the hospital industry, we continue to experience high levels of uncompensated care, including charity care and bad debts. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, our uncompensated care as a percentage of revenues, which includes the impact of uninsured discounts and charity care, was 17.8%, compared to 23.7% during the same prior year period. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our uncompensated care as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in self-pay volumes due to healthcare reform and the expansion of Medicaid coverage in certain of the states in which we operate. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, our uncompensated care as a percentage of revenues was 17.4%, compared to 23.0% during the same prior year. These reductions partially offset trends our hospitals have experienced in recent years, including increases in self-pay revenues due to a combination of broad economic factors, including high levels of unemployment in many of our markets and increasing numbers of individuals and employers who choose not to purchase insurance or who purchase insurance plans with high deductibles.

Similar to others in the hospital industry, we have a significant amount of self-pay receivables (including co-payments and deductibles from insured patients), and collecting these receivables may become more difficult if economic conditions worsen. The following table provides a summary of our accounts receivable from continuing operations by payor class mix as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014:


December 31, 2013	0-90 Days			91-180 Days			Over 180 Days			Total
Medicare(1)		26.7	%		1.0	%		1.6	%		29.3	%
Medicaid(1)		6.7			0.7			0.6			8.0
Managed Care and Other		19.6			1.6			1.2			22.4
Self-Pay(2)		9.5			9.1			21.7			40.3

Total		62.5	%		12.4	%		25.1	%		100.0	%


September 30, 2014	0-90 Days			91-180 Days			Over 180 Days			Total
Medicare(1)		29.4	%		1.2	%		1.5	%		32.1	%
Medicaid(1)		7.0			1.1			1.3			9.4
Managed Care and Other		18.0			2.4			1.9			22.3
Self-Pay(2)		8.8			7.4			20.0			36.2

Total		63.2	%		12.1	%		24.7	%		100.0	%

(1)	Includes receivables under managed Medicare or managed Medicaid programs.

(2)	Includes both uninsured as well as estimated co-payment and deductible amounts from insured patients.

The volume of self-pay accounts receivable remains sensitive to a combination of factors, including price increases, acuity of services, higher levels of insured patient co-payments and deductibles, economic factors and the increased difficulties of uninsured patients who do not qualify for charity care programs to pay for escalating healthcare costs. We have implemented a number of practices to mitigate bad debt expense and increase collections, including our uninsured discount program, increased focus on upfront cash collections, incentive plans for our hospitals’ financial counselors and registration personnel, increased focus on payment plans with non-emergent patients, among other efforts. Despite these practices, we believe bad debts will remain a significant risk for us and the rest of the hospital industry in the near term.

Revenues and Volume Trends

Our revenues depend upon inpatient occupancy levels, outpatient procedures, ancillary services and therapy programs as well as our ability to negotiate appropriate payment rates for services with third-party payors and our ability to achieve quality metrics to maximize payment from our payors.

The primary sources of our revenues before the provision for bad debts include various managed care payors, including managed Medicare and managed Medicaid programs, the traditional Medicare program, various state Medicaid programs, commercial health plans and patients themselves. We are typically paid less than our gross charges, regardless of the payor source, and report revenues before the provision for bad debts to reflect contractual adjustments and other allowances required by managed care providers and federal and state agencies.

~~Revenues~~35 from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014, increased $12.4 million to $192.1 million, compared to $179.7 million in the same prior year period. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014, increased $14.5 million to $374.7 million, compared to $360.2 million in the same prior year period.

The BCA resulted in automatic spending cuts across government programs, including a 2% reduction in Medicare spending. The automatic spending cuts, known as “sequestration”, began April 2013. Our revenues were negatively impacted by sequestration by approximately $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, however, the impact of sequestration was in effect for both three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2014. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014, were also negatively impacted (approximately $2.1 million) by the “two midnight rule” that went into effect on October 1, 2013.

Admissions, inpatient surgeries and outpatient surgeries decreased 0.5%, 3.3% and 0.2%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same prior year period. Adjusted admissions, revenue per adjusted admission and emergency room visits increased 0.5%, 6.3% and 4.2%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same prior year period. In general, we believe our hospital volumes are still being impacted by general economic conditions where we operate along with patient decisions to defer or cancel elective procedures, general primary care and other non-emergent healthcare procedures.

~~The~~Revenues ~~following~~from ~~table~~continuing ~~sets~~operations ~~forth~~for the ~~percentages~~three ofmonths ~~revenues~~ended ~~from~~September 30, ~~continuing~~2014 ~~operations~~increased $10.3 million to $195.1 million, ~~before~~compared to $184.8 million in the ~~provision~~ ~~for~~same ~~bad~~prior ~~debts~~year byperiod. ~~payor~~Revenues for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2013~~2014 ~~and~~increased ~~2014:~~$24.8 million to $569.8 million, compared to $545.0 million in the same prior year period.

	Three monthsended June 30,						Six monthsended June 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Medicare(1)		37.9	%		40.5	%		38.7	%		40.8	%
Medicaid(1)		14.5			19.1			14.5			17.8
Managed Care and other(2)		35.9			33.2			35.7			33.6
Self-Pay		11.7			7.2			11.1			7.8
Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Beginning in April 2013, the BCA resulted in automatic spending cuts (or “sequestration”) across government programs, including a 2% reduction in Medicare spending. Our revenues were negatively impacted by sequestration by approximately $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, however, the impact of sequestration was in effect for both the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, were also negatively impacted (approximately $2.9 million) by the “two midnight rule” that went into effect on October 1, 2013.

Admissions and inpatient surgeries decreased 2.7% and 6.9%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same prior year period. Adjusted admissions, revenue per adjusted admission, outpatient surgery, and emergency room visits increased 2.1%, 3.4% 2.0%, and 5.6%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same prior year period. In general, we believe our hospital volumes are still being impacted by general economic conditions where we operate along with patient decisions to defer or cancel elective procedures, general primary care and other non-emergent healthcare procedures.

The following table sets forth the percentages of revenues from continuing operations, before the provision for bad debts by payor for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2014			2013			2014
Medicare(1)		38.0	%		37.4	%		38.5	%		39.6	%
Medicaid(1)		14.2			18.4			14.4			18.0
Managed Care and other(2)		35.7			33.2			35.7			33.5
Self-Pay		12.1			11.0			11.4			8.9

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

(1)	Includes revenues received under managed Medicare or managed Medicaid programs.

(2)	Includes the health insurance exchanges, beginning with the first quarter of 2014.

Revenue per adjusted admission increased 6.3.4% and 5.80% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, compared to the same prior year periods. The increase in revenue per adjusted admission for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, is ~~primarily~~partially due to increases in acuity as evidenced by a 62.70% and 86.20% increase, respectively, in our Medicare case mix index. In addition, increases in our managed care pricing also contributed to our increase in revenue.

See “Item 1. — Business —– Sources of Revenue” and “Item 1. — Business —– Government Regulation and Other Factors”, included in the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a description of the types of payments we receive for services provided to patients enrolled in the traditional Medicare plan, managed Medicare plans, Medicaid plans, managed Medicaid plans and managed care plans. In those sections, we also discuss the unique reimbursement features of the traditional Medicare plan, including the annual Medicare regulatory updates published by CMS that impact reimbursement rates for services provided under the plan. The future potential impact to reimbursement for certain of these payors under the Affordable Care Act is also addressed in the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:

•

it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and

•

changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been made could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Our critical accounting estimates are more fully described in the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes in the nature of our critical accounting policies or the application of those policies since December 31, 2013.

3337

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents summaries of results from continuing operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Dollar amounts below are in millions.

	Three Months EndedJune 30, 2013						Three Months EndedJune 30, 2014						Six Months EndedJune 30, 2013						Six Months EndedJune 30, 2014
	Three Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013						Three Months EndedSeptember 30, 2014						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2014
	Amount			~~Percentage~~Percent			Amount			~~Percentage~~Percent			Amount			~~Percentage~~Percent			Amount			~~Percentage~~Percent
Revenues before provision for bad debts	$	~~204~~210.41			113.7	%	$	~~208~~216.37			~~108~~111.41	%	$	~~408~~618.56			113.45	%	$	~~414~~630.18			110.57	%
Provision for bad debts		(2425.73	)		(13.7	)		(1621.26	)		(811.41	)		(4873.36	)		(13.45	)		(3961.40	)		(10.57	)
Revenues		~~179~~184.78			100.0			~~192~~195.1			100.0			~~360~~545.20			100.0			~~374~~569.78			100.0
Salaries and benefits		8384.57			4645.58			9288.49			4845.16			~~168~~252.29			46.74			~~180~~269.32			4847.12
Supplies		2931.5			1617.40			3133.64			1617.41			5991.61			16.57			6295.04			16.57
Other operating expenses		4647.64			25.96			5048.04			2624.08			91138.26			25.34			96145.60			25.84
Other income		(05.32	)		(0.2.8	)		(35.06	)		(12.69	)		(05.35	)		—(1.0	)		(49.39	)		(1.17	)
Management fees		~~0.1~~—			—			~~0.1~~—			—			0.1			—			0.1			—
Interest, net		13.47			7.54			13.82			76.28			2741.30			7.65			2740.68			7.42
Depreciation and amortization		11.19			6.24			1110.37			5.95			2133.32			56.91			2233.52			65.08
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(4.2	)		(2.3	)		(4.1	)		(2.1	)		(7.2	)		(2.0	)		(10.1	)		(2.7	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		0.8			0.4			6.1			3.1			(6.4	)		(1.2	)		(4.0	)		(0.7	)
Income taxes		10.38			0.74			01.81			0.46			23.42			0.76			12.78			0.5
Loss from continuing operations		(5.5	)		(3.1	)		(4.9	)		(2.6	)		(9.6	)		(2.7	)		(11.8	)		(3.1	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		—			—			5.0			2.6			(9.6	)		(1.8	)		(6.8	)		(1.2	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(15.20	)		(02.7	)		(0.34	)		(0.12	)		(27.8	)		(01.84	)		(23.71	)		(0.75	)
Net loss	$	(6.7	)		(3.7	)	$	(5.2	)		(2.7	)	$	(12.4	)		(3.4	)	$	(14.5	)		(3.9	)
Net income (loss)	$	(5.0	)		(2.7	)	$	4.6			2.4		$	(17.4	)		(3.2	)	$	(9.9	)		(1.7	)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests		(0.21	)		(0.1	)		(0.21	)		(0.1	)		(0.32	)		~~(0.1~~—	)		(0.12	)		—
Net loss attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(6.5	)		(3.6	)%	$	(5.4	)		(2.8	)%	$	(12.1	)		(3.4	)%	$	(14.4	)		(3.8	)%
Net income (loss) attributable to Capella Healthcare, Inc.	$	(5.1	)		(2.8	)%	$	4.7			2.4	%	$	(17.2	)		(3.2	)%	$	(9.7	)		(1.7	)%

Selected Operating Data

The following table sets forth certain unaudited operating data and excludes all discontinued operations for each of the periods presented.

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2013

2014

2013

2014

Continuing operations:

Admissions(1)

10,~~452~~643

10,~~398~~356

2132,~~453~~096

2031,~~727~~083

Adjusted admissions(2)

22,~~849~~961

2223,~~970~~434

4568,~~508~~476

4468,~~766~~184

Revenue per adjusted admission

78,~~865~~053

8,~~363~~325

7,~~914~~961

8,~~371~~357

Inpatient surgeries

2,~~340~~490

2,~~263~~319

47,~~753~~243

46,~~462~~781

Outpatient surgeries(3)

5,~~814~~683

5,~~801~~794

1117,~~446~~129

1116,~~104~~898

Emergency room visits(4)

5455,~~612~~669

5658,~~886~~814

~~110~~166,~~550~~219

~~110~~169,~~226~~040

(1)	Represents the total number of patients admitted to our hospitals and used by management and investors as a general measure of inpatient volume.

(2)	Adjusted admissions are used as a general measure of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. We compute adjusted admissions by multiplying admissions by the outpatient factor (the sum of gross inpatient revenue and gross outpatient revenue and then dividing the result by gross inpatient revenue).

(3)	Outpatient surgeries are surgeries that do not require admission to our hospitals.

(4)	Represents the total number of hospital-based emergency room visits.

34Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to September 30, 2013

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to June 30, 2013

The following discussion is for continuing operations only and excludes all operations included in discontinued operations.

Revenues. Revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was $~~192~~195.1 million, an increase of $1210.43 million, or 65.95%, over the prior year period. The increase in revenues was due to anincreases ~~increase~~ in adjusted admissions of 02.51%, emergency room visits of 45.26% and anoverall ~~increase in~~ acuity combined with an improved payor mix. As previously discussed, revenues were negatively impacted by the two midnight rule. We estimated that the two midnight rule had a negative impact on revenues of approximately $0.78 million, compared to the prior year period.

Our provision for bad debts was down $83.57 million, or 3414.46%, compared to the prior year period. We continue to experience ~~high~~relatively high levels of uncompensated care and ~~high~~ emergency room self-pay volumes although they have abated somewhat in the ~~second~~current ~~quarter~~year. Self-pay admissions were 34.65% of total admissions, compared to 6.46% in the prior year period. Our provision for doubtful ~~accounts~~ accounts decreased as a result of lower self-pay revenues during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Self-pay revenues before the provision for bad debts decreased from 1112.71% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, to 711.20% in the current period as a result of a shift from self-pay to Medicaid and HMOs, PPOs and other private insurers for a portion of our patient population, which primarily was a result of healthcare reform and the expansion of Medicaid coverage in certain of the states in which we operate. The provision for doubtful accounts relates principally to self-pay amounts due from patients.

Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was $9288.49 million, or 4845.16% of revenues, compared to $8384.57 million, or 4645.58% of revenues, in the prior year period. ~~The increase in salaries and benefits as a percentage of revenues is due primarily to increased stock based compensation expense.~~ Non-cash stock-based compensation expense was $30.24 million and $0.21 million, for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In connection with the increased non-cash stock-based compensation, due to the previously mentioned equity restructuring by our Parent, the Company made a cash payment of $1.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014, that is also included in salaries and benefits expense. After adjusting for the $4.7 million current period expense related to the equity awards issued by our Parent in connection with the equity restructuring, salaries and benefits were approximately 45.7% of revenues, compared to 46.5% of revenues in the prior year period.

Supplies. Supplies expense ~~increased~~was by $233.14 million ~~but,~~or ~~remained~~17.1% ~~flat~~compared ~~as a~~to ~~percentage~~$31.5 ofmillion ~~revenues~~or ~~remained~~17.0% ~~flat~~of atrevenues, ~~16.4%~~in ~~for~~the ~~both~~prior ~~periods~~period.

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include, among other things, contract services, professional fees, repairs and maintenance, rents and leases, utilities, insurance, non-income taxes and physician income guarantee amortization. Our other operating expenses increased $31.40 million during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to the prior year period. This increase was primarily due to higher utilization of contract and professional services related to the implementation of new service lines at certain of our facilities.

Other income. Other income includes EHR incentive payments, which represent those incentives under the HITECH Act for which the recognition criteria have been met. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, EHR incentive income increased by $20.74 million.

Income taxes. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was approximately 1918.50% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to 31100.0% for the same prior year period. The change in the effective tax rate is driven by changes in the level of pretax income combined with our net deferred tax liability position and related limitations with respect to indefinite ~~life~~ life deferred tax liabilities.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 Compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2013

The following discussion is for continuing operations only and excludes all operations included in discontinued operations.

Revenues. Revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was $~~374~~569.78 million, an increase of $1424.58 million, or 4.05%, over ~~the~~ the prior year period. The increase in revenues was due to an increase in revenue per adjusted admission of 5.80%, offset by a decline in adjusted admissions of approximately 10.64%. Overall, our revenues were positively impacted by the 84.20% increase in in case mix and reductions in self-pay volumes over the prior year. As previously discussed, revenues were negatively impacted by the two midnight rule. We estimated that the two midnight rule had a negative impact on revenues of approximately $2.19 million, compared to the prior year period.

~~Our~~39 provision for bad debts was down $8.9 million, or 18.4%, compared to the prior year period. Self-pay admissions were 4.0% of total admissions, compared to 5.8% in the prior year period. Our provision for doubtful accounts decreased as a result of lower self-pay revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Self-pay revenues before the provision for bad debts decreased over the same period last year as a result of a shift from self-pay to Medicaid and HMOs, PPOs and other private insurers for a portion of our patient population, which primarily was a result of healthcare reform and the expansion of Medicaid coverage in certain of the states in which we operate. The provision for doubtful accounts relates principally to self-pay amounts due from patients.

~~Salaries~~Our ~~and~~provision ~~benefits. Salaries and benefits~~ for ~~the~~bad ~~six~~debts ~~months ended June 30, 2014~~ was down $~~180~~12.36 million, or 4817.1% ~~of revenues~~, compared to ~~$168~~the prior year period.2 Self-pay ~~million,~~admissions orwere 464.72% of ~~revenues~~total admissions, compared to 6.1% in the prior year period. ~~The~~Our ~~increase~~provision infor ~~salaries~~doubtful ~~and~~accounts ~~benefits~~decreased as a ~~percentage~~result of ~~revenues~~lower ~~is due primarily to the reinstatement of the 401K match, higher benefit costs and increased stock based compensation expense. Non~~self-~~cash~~pay ~~stock-based~~revenues ~~compensation~~during ~~expense was $3.3 million and $0.5 million, for~~ the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 ~~and 2013, respectively~~. ~~In connection with the increased non~~Self-~~cash~~pay ~~stock-based~~revenues ~~compensation,~~before ~~due~~the toprovision ~~the~~for ~~previously~~bad ~~mentioned~~debts ~~equity~~decreased ~~restructuring~~over bythe ~~our~~same ~~Parent,~~period ~~the~~last ~~Company~~year ~~made~~as a ~~cash~~result ~~payment~~ of ~~$1.8~~a ~~million~~shift ~~during~~from ~~the~~self-pay ~~three~~to ~~months~~Medicaid ~~ended~~and ~~June 30~~HMOs, ~~2014,~~PPOs ~~that~~and isother ~~also~~private ~~included~~insurers infor ~~salaries~~a ~~and~~portion ~~benefits~~of ~~expense. After~~our ~~adjusting~~patient ~~for~~population, ~~the~~which ~~current~~primarily ~~period~~was ~~expense~~a ~~related~~result toof healthcare ~~the~~reform ~~equity~~and ~~awards~~the ~~issued~~expansion byof ~~our~~Medicaid ~~Parent~~coverage in ~~connection~~certain ~~with~~of ~~its~~the ~~equity~~states ~~restructuring,~~in ~~salaries~~which ~~and~~we ~~benefits~~operate. ~~were~~The ~~approximately~~provision ~~46.9%~~for ofdoubtful ~~revenues,~~accounts ~~compared~~relates principally to ~~46.7%~~self-pay ofamounts ~~revenues~~due infrom ~~the prior year period~~patients.

~~Supplies~~Salaries and benefits. AsSalaries and benefits for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $269.2 million, or 47.2% of revenues, compared to $252.9 million, or 46.4% of revenues, in the prior year period. The increase in salaries and benefits as a percentage of revenues is due primarily to the reinstatement of the 401K match, ~~supplies~~higher benefit costs and increased stock based compensation expense. ~~remained~~Non-cash ~~flat~~stock-based compensation expense was $3.7 million and $0.6 million, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 ~~compared~~and 2013, respectively. In connection with the increased non-cash stock-based compensation, due to the previously mentioned equity restructuring by our Parent, the Company made a cash payment of $1.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, that is also included in salaries and benefits expense. After adjusting for the current period expense related to the equity awards issued by our Parent in connection with its equity restructuring, salaries and benefits were approximately 46.4% of revenues, compared to 46.4% of revenues in the prior year period.

~~Other operating expenses~~Supplies. ~~Other~~As ~~operating~~a ~~expenses~~percentage ~~include,~~of ~~among other things~~revenues, ~~contract~~supplies ~~services, professional~~expense ~~fees,~~remained ~~repairs~~flat ~~and~~for ~~maintenance, rents and leases, utilities, insurance, non-income taxes and physician income guarantee amortization. Our other operating expenses increased $5.4 million during~~ the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to the prior year period. ~~The increase was primarily due to higher utilization of contract and professional services related to the implementation of new service lines and hospitalist programs at certain of our facilities.~~

Other ~~income~~operating expenses. Other ~~income~~operating ~~includes~~expenses ~~EHR~~include, ~~incentive~~among ~~payments~~other things, ~~which~~contract ~~represent~~services, ~~those~~professional fees, ~~incentives~~repairs ~~under~~and ~~the~~maintenance, ~~HITECH~~rents ~~Act~~and ~~for~~leases, ~~which~~utilities, ~~the recognition~~insurance, ~~criteria~~non-income ~~have~~taxes ~~been~~and ~~met~~physician income guarantee amortization. ~~For~~Our other operating expenses increased $6.4 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, wecompared to ~~recognized~~the $4prior year period.3 ~~million~~The ofincrease ~~incentive~~was ~~reimbursements~~primarily ~~income,~~due orto anhigher ~~increase~~utilization of ~~$4.0~~contract ~~million~~and ~~over~~professional services related to the ~~comparable~~implementation ~~six~~of ~~months~~new ~~ended~~service ~~June 30,~~lines ~~2013~~and hospitalist programs at certain of our facilities.

~~Income~~Other ~~taxes~~income. ~~Our~~Other ~~effective~~income ~~tax~~includes ~~rate~~EHR ~~from~~incentive ~~continuing~~payments, ~~operations~~which ~~was~~represent ~~approximately~~those ~~16.8%~~incentives ~~for~~under the ~~six~~HITECH ~~months~~Act ~~ended~~for ~~June 30,~~which ~~2014~~the ~~compared~~recognition tocriteria ~~33.3%~~have ~~for~~been ~~the same prior year period~~met. ~~The~~For ~~change in~~ the ~~effective~~nine ~~tax~~months ~~rate~~ended isSeptember 30, ~~driven~~2014, bywe ~~changes~~recognized in$9.9 ~~the~~million ~~level~~ of ~~pretax~~incentive reimbursements income, ~~combined~~or ~~with~~an ~~our~~increase ~~net~~of ~~deferred~~$4.4 ~~tax~~million ~~liability~~over ~~position~~the ~~and~~comparable ~~related~~nine ~~limitations~~months ~~with~~ended ~~respect~~September 30, ~~to indefinite life deferred tax liabilities~~2013.

Income taxes. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was approximately 70.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to 50.0% for the same prior year period. The change in the effective tax rate is driven by changes in the level of pretax income combined with our net deferred tax liability position and related limitations with respect to indefinite life deferred tax liabilities.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2014, are as follows (in millions).

	Six Months EndedJune 30,
	Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2013			2014
Cash provided by operating activities	$	67.0		$	813.85
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(15.4	)		0.8
Cash used in investing activities		(19.9	)		(7.0	)
Cash used in financing activities		(37.32	)		(1032.34	)

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities increased by $26.85 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to the ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ ~~June~~ended September 30, 2013. Net changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of divestitures, negatively impacted operating cash flows by $5593.3 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 compared to a negative impact of $4579.47 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Cash flows from operating activities were impacted by the interest payments of $2550.50 million and $49.4 million for ~~both~~the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had working capital of $4552.01 million, including cash and cash equivalents of $250.75 million. At December 31, 2013, our working capital excluding assets and liabilities held for sale was $33.2 million, including cash and cash equivalents of $26.4 million.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was $1519.49 million ~~for~~and ~~the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to cash provided by investing activities of~~ $07.80 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we received $11.2 million in proceeds from the sale of one of our hospitals.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities was $37.32 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, compared to $1032.34 million for the ~~six months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. ~~Cash~~During ~~used~~July in2014, ~~financing~~we ~~activities~~exercised ~~includes~~a purchase option for approximately $739.54 million, excluding other costs and fees, to acquire certain tangible assets of ~~payments~~Muskogee ~~made~~Community onHospital ~~our~~(“MCH”) that were previously subject to a capital lease. ~~obligations~~Additionally, ~~along~~in ~~with~~July ~~approximately~~2014, we repaid the outstanding principal balance of $21.07 million offor ~~payments~~the ofpromissory ~~refinancing~~note ~~costs~~previously ~~and~~issued ~~fees,~~in aconnection ~~portion~~with our July 2012 acquisition of ~~which~~accounts receivable, supplies, inventory, goodwill and other intangible assets related to ~~the~~MCH. ~~ABL~~We ~~Amendment~~used ~~during~~$5.3 million in available cash and cash equivalents, and used $35.0 million in availability from our 2010 Revolving Facility, to fund the ~~six~~purchase ~~months~~and ~~ended~~repayment. ~~June 30~~Since July, ~~2014~~we have made repayments of $14.0 million on the outstanding 2010 Revolving Facility.

AsCash used in financing activities includes approximately $49.0 million of ~~June 30,~~payments ~~2014,~~made on our ~~outstanding~~capital ~~debt~~lease ~~was~~and ~~$551.3 million~~other obligations, ~~and~~including wethe ~~had~~MCH buy-out transaction mentioned above, along with approximately $642.91 million of ~~borrowing~~payments ~~capacity~~of ~~under~~refinancing ~~the~~costs ~~2010~~and ~~Revolving Facility~~fees, ~~net~~a portion of ~~outstanding~~which related ~~letters~~to ofthe ~~credit~~ABL Amendment during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

As of September 30, 2014, our outstanding debt was $531.0 million, and we had availability of $51.5 million under the 2010 Revolving Facility, net of a $21.0 million outstanding balance due and $5.7 million outstanding letters of credit.

Capital Resources

We rely on available cash, cash flows generated by operations and available borrowing capacity under the 2010 Revolving Facility to fund our operations and capital expenditures. We invest our cash in accounts in high-quality financial institutions. We continually explore various options to increase the return on our invested cash while preserving our principal cash balances. However, the significant majority of our cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts that are not federally-insured and could be at risk in the event of a collapse of the financial institutions at which those accounts are held.

In addition to available cash, our liquidity and ability to fund our capital requirements are dependent on our future financial performance, which is subject to general economic, financial and other factors that are beyond our control. If those factors significantly change or other unexpected factors adversely affect us, our business may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations or we may not be able to obtain future financings to meet our liquidity needs.

We anticipate that, to the extent additional liquidity is necessary to fund our operations or capital expenditures, it would be funded through borrowings under our 2010 Revolving Facility, the incurrence of other indebtedness, additional note issuances or a combination of these potential sources of liquidity. We finalized the ABL Amendment and extension of the 2010 Revolving Facility during the three months ended June 30, 2014. We may not be able to complete future refinancings or obtain other additional liquidity when needed on terms acceptable to us.

We also intend to continue to pursue acquisitions or partnering arrangements, either in existing markets or new markets, which fit our growth strategies. To finance such transactions, we may draw upon cash on hand, amounts available under our revolving credit facility, divest certain assets within our portfolio or seek additional funding sources. We continually assess our capital needs and may seek additional financing, including debt or equity, as considered necessary, to fund potential acquisitions, fund capital projects or for other corporate purposes. We may be unable to raise additional equity proceeds from the investment funds affiliated with GTCR Golder Rauner II, L.L.C. (collectively, with GTCR Golder Rauner, L.L.C. and certain other affiliated entities, “GTCR”), which are our principal investors, or other investors should we need to obtain cash for any of these purposes. Our future operating performance, ability to service our debt and ability to draw upon other sources of capital will be subject to future economic conditions and other business factors, many of which are beyond our control.

Debt Covenants

The indenture governing the 9 1⁄4% Notes contains a number of covenants that among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries, to sell assets, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock, create liens on assets, make investments, engage in mergers or consolidations, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. At December 31, 2013 and ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we were in compliance with debt covenants that were subject to testing at such dates.

Obligations and Commitments

Except with respect to the asset purchase and note repayment described inabove ~~the~~under ~~following~~Financing ~~paragraph~~Activities, during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2014, there were no material changes in our contractual obligations as presented in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In July 2014, we exercised a purchase option for approximately $39.4 million, excluding other costs and fees, to acquire certain tangible assets of Muskogee Community Hospital (“MCH”) that were subject to a capital lease. Additionally, in July 2014, we repaid the outstanding principal balance for the promissory note previously issued in connection with our July 2012 acquisition of accounts receivable, supplies, inventory, goodwill and other intangible assets related to MCH. We used $5.3 million in available cash and cash equivalents, including utilizing $35.0 million in availability from its 2010 Revolving Facility, to fund the purchase and repayment. As of June 30, 2014, we included the $38.9 million capital lease liability and the $1.7 million note payable, in the current portion of long-term debt on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. After giving effect to our July 2014 utilization of $35.0 million in availability under the 2010 Revolving Facility, our outstanding debt would have been approximately $545.6 million and we would have had $29.9 million of borrowing capacity under the 2010 Revolving Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit.

Guarantees and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to certain master lease agreements and other similar arrangements with non-affiliated entities.

We enter into physician income guarantees and other guarantee arrangements, including parent-subsidiary guarantees, in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe we have engaged in any transaction or arrangement with an unconsolidated entity that is reasonably likely to affect liquidity materially.

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices

Various federal, state and local laws have been enacted that, in certain cases, limit our ability to increase prices. Revenue for acute hospital services rendered to Medicare patients is established under the federal government’s prospective payment system. We believe that hospital industry operating margins have been, and may continue to be, under significant pressure because of changes in payor mix and growth in operating expenses in excess of the increase in prospective payments under the Medicare program. In addition, as a result of increasing regulatory and competitive pressures, our ability to maintain operating margins through price increases to non-Medicare patients is limited.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our financing, investing and cash management activities. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had no indebtedness outstanding bearing interest at variable rates. Although changes in the alternate base rate or the LIBOR rate would affect the cost of funds borrowed under the 2010 Revolving Facility in the future, we believe the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates would not be material to our results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us (including our consolidated subsidiaries) in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 that have affected materially, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, our internal control over financial reporting.

38PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We operate in a highly regulated and litigious industry. As a result, we are, from time to time, subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims for damages for personal injuries, medical malpractice, breach of contracts, wrongful restriction of or interference with physicians’ staff privileges and employment related claims. In certain of these actions, plaintiffs request payment for damages, including punitive damages that may not be covered by insurance. We are currently not a party to any pending or threatened proceeding, which, in management’s opinion, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have not been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3943

Item 6. Exhibits

ExhibitNumber		Description
Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Capella Healthcare, Inc. (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
3.2		By-Laws of Capella Healthcare, Inc. (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
4.1		Indenture, dated as of June 28, 2010, among Capella Healthcare, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
4.2		Form of 9 1⁄4% Senior Notes due 2017 (included in Exhibit 4.1) (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
4.3		Form of Supplemental Indenture to add a Guaranty Subsidiary (incorporated by reference from exhibits to Capella Healthcare Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)
10.1		Amendment No. 32 to ~~Loan~~Senior ~~and~~Management ~~Security~~ Agreement, dated as of ~~June~~September 315, 2014, by and among Capella ~~Healthcare~~Holdings, Inc., ~~the~~Capella ~~borrowing subsidiaries signatory thereto~~Healthcare, ~~the guarantying subsidiaries signatory thereto~~Inc., ~~the~~Daniel ~~lenders~~S. ~~party~~Slipkovich ~~thereto~~ and ~~Bank~~GTCR ofFund ~~America~~VIII, NL.AP. as agent for the lenders (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 9, 2014, File No. 333-175188)**
10.2		The Capella Holdings, Inc. 2014 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on April 23, 2014, File No. 333-175188)
10.3		Form of Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on April 23, 2014, File No. 333-175188)
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*

*	Furnished electronically herewith.

**44 ~~An application for confidential treatment for selected portions of this document has been submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Capella Healthcare, Inc.

By:		/s/ Denise W. Warren
		Denise W. Warren
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~August~~October 731, 2014

4145

EXHIBIT INDEX

ExhibitNumber		Description
Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Capella Healthcare, Inc. (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
3.2		By-Laws of Capella Healthcare, Inc. (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
4.1		Indenture, dated as of June 28, 2010, among Capella Healthcare, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
4.2		Form of 9 1⁄4% Senior Notes due 2017 (included in Exhibit 4.1) (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 28, 2011, File No. 333-175188)
4.3		Form of Supplemental Indenture to add a Guaranty Subsidiary (incorporated by reference from exhibits to Capella Healthcare Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)
10.1		Amendment No. 32 to ~~Loan~~Senior ~~and~~Management ~~Security~~ Agreement, dated as of ~~June~~September 315, 2014, by and among Capella ~~Healthcare~~Holdings, Inc., ~~the~~Capella ~~borrowing subsidiaries signatory thereto~~Healthcare, ~~the guarantying subsidiaries signatory thereto~~Inc., ~~the~~Daniel ~~lenders~~S. ~~party~~Slipkovich ~~thereto~~ and ~~Bank~~GTCR ofFund ~~America~~VIII, NL.AP. as agent for the lenders (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on June 9, 2014, File No. 333-175188)**
10.2		The Capella Holdings, Inc. 2014 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on April 23, 2014, File No. 333-175188)
10.3		Form of Option Agreement (incorporated by reference from exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Capella Healthcare, Inc. on April 23, 2014, File No. 333-175188)
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Capella Healthcare, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*

*	Furnished electronically herewith.

**46 ~~An application for confidential treatment for selected portions of this document has been submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.~~

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Filing Compare · Capella Healthcare, Inc.